alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I, Richard Hiron, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bow Valley Ventures,  Inc. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  January 19, 2009/s/Richard HironBy:Richard HironPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Alice H. Dougherty, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

October 4, 1937.

*Lowe & Dougherty,*for the executors.

*Edgar Hirschberg,*for the State Tax Commission.

Delehanty, S.

This is an appeal by the executors from the order of June 11, 1937, fixing the estate tax on the appraiser’s report. The ground of appeal is that the appraiser failed to allow as a deduction the sum of $1,000 bequeathed in the second paragraph of the will to “ The Evergreens ” for the perpetual care of the decedent’s grave.

The decedent died on February 11, 1936, and it is the contention of the State Tax Commission that under the authority of *Matter of Cohen*(270 N. Y. 383) the gift is taxable. While that case involved the provisions of the former Transfer Tax Law, the State Tax Commission argues that the reasoning therein is equally applicable to the Estate Tax Law governing this estate. In the *Cohen*case a bequest to a cemetery association for the perpetual care of decedent’s grave was held to be a taxable transfer under section 220 of the former Transfer Tax Law. The court specifically limited its decision to the provisions of section 220 which it held “ makes taxable every transfer by will ” unless coming within the broad exemptions for charitable corporations as provided for in section 221 of the Tax Law. The new Estate Tax Law applicable to this estate does not provide for the imposition of a tax upon every transfer by will. Section 249-n of the Estate Tax Law imposes a tax only “ upon the transfer of the net estate.” The net estate in accordance with section 249-s is determined by deducting from the value of the gross estate various items including funeral expenses. Funeral expenses include “ a reasonable charge or expenditure for the perpetual care of the decedent’s burial lot ” (Surr. Ct. *761Act, § 314). The reasonableness of the 11,000 bequest for perpetual care in the instant case is not questioned and this amount should be deducted from the gross estate in ascertaining the net estate subject to tax.

Subsequent to the decision in *Matter of Cohen,*section 249-s of the Tax Law was amended by chapter 644 of the Laws of 1937, in effect May 26, 1937. The amendment, inserted in the section authorizing the deduction of funeral expenses in ascertaining the net estate, reads *“*for the purposes of this section, a bequest for the perpetual care of the decedent’s burial lot, and suitable monumental work to be erected thereon, shall be deemed a funeral expense, to the extent that it constitutes a reasonable amount for such purposes.” While this amendment is not retroactive to February 11, 1936, the date of this decedent’s death, neither is it indicative of a change in the law as it existed at that date. The amendment undoubtedly was enacted to remove any possibility of applying the decision in *Matter of Cohen*to the provisions of the new Estate Tax Law. It was merely a clarification of the existing law rather than a change therein. The appeal is sustained.

Submit, on notice, order modifying the order fixing tax accordingly.
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2015 - 0824 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM191AD

A300 - 57 - 6045, R09 --- 5/21/13 A300 - 57 - 6045, R08 --- 6/6/11 A300 - 57 - 6045, R07 --- 8/14/08 A300 - 57 - 6045, R06 --- 1/13/05 A300 - 57 - 6045, R05 --- 6/13/03 A300 - 57 - 6045, R04 --- 1/11/02 A300 - 57 - 6045, R03 --- 10/25/99

Name /Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### AY **BE VIEWED A T:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 0 3/05/2008
# L_2012031EN.01000701.xml

| 3.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/7

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 54/2012 of 23 January 2012 implementing Regulation (EU) No 961/2010 on restrictive measures against Iran

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 19 of 24 January 2012
  )

On page 5, Annex III, ‘Entries referred to in Article 1(3)’, fifth column of the table, ‘Date of listing’, entries 1 and 2:

for:

‘
  23.1.2012
  ’,

read:

‘
  26.7.2010
  ’.

---
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 334

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Commerce

AN ACT

To amend the Federal Power Act to remove the jurisdiction

of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to license

projects on fresh waters in the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROJECTS ON FRESH WATERS IN THE STATE

4 OF HAWAII.

5 Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

6 797(e)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘sev7 eral States, or upon’’ and inserting ‘‘several States (except

8 fresh waters in the State of Hawaii, unless a license would

9 be required under section 23), or upon’’.

Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3018 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3018

 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect to municipal 
                               deposits.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 7, 2000

 Mr. Torricelli (for himself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Federal Deposit Insurance Act with respect to municipal 
                               deposits.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Municipal Deposit Insurance 
Protection Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. FDIC INSURANCE OF MUNICIPAL DEPOSITS.

    Section 11(a)(2) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 
1821(a)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(C)(i) Notwithstanding subparagraph (A), the deposits of an in-
State municipal depositor at an insured depository institution shall be 
insured in an amount equal to the total amount of those deposits.
    ``(ii) In this subparagraph--
            ``(I) the term `in-State municipal depositor' means a 
        municipal depositor that is located in the same State as the 
        office or branch of the insured depository institution at which 
        the deposits of that depositor are held; and
            ``(II) the term `municipal depositor' means a depositor 
        described in any of clauses (i) through (v) of subparagraph 
        (A).''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2011030EN.01002101.xml

| 4.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 30/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 30/21

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 94/2011

of 3 February 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Carciofo Spinoso di Sardegna (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Carciofo Spinoso di Sardegna’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Carciofo Spinoso di Sardegna’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 3 February 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 149, 8.6.2010, p. 9.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Carciofo Spinoso di Sardegna (PDO)

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-6757

FRANCIS CURTIS DAVIS, a/k/a Abdul-Malik Francis As-Salafi,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

WARDEN BROWN,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at 

Wheeling. John Preston Bailey, District Judge. (5:23-cv-00173-JPB-JPM)

Submitted: October 3, 2023 Decided: October 19, 2023

Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Abdul-Malik Francis As-Salafi, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6757 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/19/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Francis Curtis Davis, a/k/a Abdul-Malik Francis As-Salafi, a federal prisoner, 

appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition, in which he 

challenged the execution of his sentence, for failure to exhaust alternative remedies. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See Timms v. Johns, 627 F.3d 525, 

530-31 (4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order, see Davis v. 

Brown, No. 5:23-cv-00173-JPB-JPM (N.D.W. Va. July 26, 2023), but we modify the 

dismissal to be without prejudice, see 28 U.S.C. § 2106; Timms, 627 F.3d at 533. We deny 

the motion for bond or release pending appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-6757 Doc: 9 Filed: 10/19/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dana S. Philbrook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-B (Item 601(b)(32))
promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act). In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not
be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Dana S. Philbrook  
|Dana S. Philbrook      
|Chief Financial Officer

September 15, 2006
Cite as 2015 Ark. 338



## SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

IN THE MATTER OF THE APPOINTMENT OF A SPECIAL JUSTICE Opinion Delivered September 24 , 2015

PER CURIAM Honorable David Newbern shall be appointed as a special justice, and shall be given authority for the express purpose of swearing in newly appointed Arkansas Supreme Court Chief Justice Howard W. Brill on October 23, 2015.
# C_2012382EN.01000701.xml

| 12.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/7

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 27 November 2012

renewing the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2012/C 382/06

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the three nominees submitted to the Council by the Commission as regards the employers' representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. However, this Decision did not include all of the members to be appointed, |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 16 July 2012 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2012 to 17 September 2015. However, this Decision did not include all of the members to be appointed,

2

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following persons are hereby appointed members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of its term of office, which runs until 17 September 2015:

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS

REPRESENTATIVES OF THE EMPLOYERS’ ORGANISATIONS

| Portugal | Ms Ana Maria SANTOS GOUVEIA LOPES |
| --- | --- |
| Slovakia | Mr Martin HOSTAK |
| United Kingdom | Ms Kate LING |

Portugal

Ms Ana Maria SANTOS GOUVEIA LOPES

Slovakia

Mr Martin HOSTAK

United Kingdom

Ms Kate LING

Article 2

This Decision shall be published, for information, in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 27 November 2012.

For the Council

The President

G. DEMOSTHENOUS

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 228, 31.7.2012, p. 3.

2

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

   WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of S1 Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)   the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004
      filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                               /s/ JAIME W. ELLERTSON
                                               --------------------------
                                               Jaime W. Ellertson
                                               Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange commission or its
staff upon request.

March 15, 2005
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3032

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design Program

Act of 1994, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 12, 2000

Mr. SMITH of New Hampshire (for himself, Mr. WARNER, and Mr. L.

CHAFEE) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To reauthorize the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and

Design Program Act of 1994, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Junior Duck Stamp

5 Reauthorization Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF JUNIOR DUCK STAMP CON7 SERVATION AND DESIGN PROGRAM ACT OF

8 1994.

9 Section 5 of the Junior Duck Stamp Conservation

10 and Design Program Act of 1994 (16 U.S.C. 719c) is
2

•S 3032 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘for each of the fiscal years 1995

2 through 2000’’ and inserting ‘‘for each of fiscal years

3 2001 through 2005’’.

4 SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF PROGRAM TO INSULAR AREAS.

5 The Junior Duck Stamp Conservation and Design

6 Program Act of 1994 is amended—

7 (1) by redesignating sections 2 through 6 (16

8 U.S.C. 719 through 719c; 16 U.S.C. 668dd note) as

9 sections 3 through 7, respectively;

10 (2) by inserting after section 1 (16 U.S.C. 719

11 note) the following:

12 ‘‘SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF STATE.

13 ‘‘In this Act, the term ‘State’ means a State, the Dis14 trict of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the

15 Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, Amer16 ican Samoa, Guam, the Virgin Islands, and any other ter17 ritory or possession of the United States.’’;

18 (3) in section 3(c) (16 U.S.C. 719(c)) (as redes19 ignated by paragraph (1)), by striking ‘‘50 States’’

20 each place it appears and inserting ‘‘States’’; and

21 (4) in section 5 (16 U.S.C. 719b) (as redesig22 nated by paragraph (1)), by striking ‘‘section 3(c)(1)

23 (A) and (B)’’ and inserting ‘‘subparagraphs (A) and

24 (B) of section 4(c)(1)’’.

Æ