alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Mark
R. Stauffer, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orion Marine Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) 
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) 
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






By:
            /s/
      Mark R. StaufferAugust
      8, 2008
            Mark
      R. StaufferExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
SERVED SEPTEMBER 27, 2012 :~::P.:~,RTMENT OF 

·"· ·'rJC'f1 ')RTATI011 1 ; '!i\t\ r..) _,.,\ . f\ l ""' 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION .).~::J<ET OPEFlATIOi\b 

In The Matter Of: 

EMPIRE FLIGHT ACADEMY 

Respondent 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) 

) 

) 

) . 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2011-0290 

Case No. CP10EA0004 

NOTICE OF HEARING LOCATION 

28 p 1:1.~9 

On March 23, 2012, an Order Setting New Litigation Dates and Procedures was filed, 

which noted that the location of the Hearing would be provided by separate Notice to the parties. 

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the hearing in this case, set to begin on October 16,2012 

at 9:00am EST, will be held at the following location: · 

United States District Court 

Eastern District ofNew York 

Long Island Courthouse 

Courtroom 710 

100 Federal Plaza 

Central Islip, NY 11722-4438 

The courthouse opens to the public at 8:00am. The Hearing begins at 9:00am. Please 

allow time to pass through security. Cameras, including cellular telephones incorporating 

cameras, are not allowed in federal courthouses. 

Attachment - Service List 
Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

A~tention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W10001 

ONE COPY 

John Zaremba, Respondent's Representative 

Rte. 109, Hanger 3, Republic Airport 

Farmingdale, NY 11735 

TEL: 631-777-2514 

Zachary M. Berman, Complainant's Counsel 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AEA-7 

Eastern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza, Room 561 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3258 

FAX: 718-533-5699 

The Honorable J .E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey A venue, S;E. (E11-31 0) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2011-0290 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
#### Pelon, Respondent, vs. Becco and wife, Appellants.

*September 13*

October *12, 1948.*

*280For the appellants there was a brief *by. Benton, Bosser, Becker, Parnell & Fulton*of Appleton, and oral argument by *David Fulton.*

*Norman B. Langill*of Marinette, for the respondent.

Hughes, J.

Appellants contend that it was error on the part of the trial court to deny the motion for summary judgment on this state of the record. Appellants rely strongly upón what was said by this court in *Brown v. Appleton Masonic Temple Asso.*(1943) 243 Wis. 147, 9 N. W. (2d) 637, to the effect that a mere waxing of a 'ballroom floor does not create a liability toward a user thereof who may fall on such slippery surface. Appellants also cite other cases to like effect upon the - substantive law that the washing of a floor or usuál and customary measures of preserving a floor open to the public do not make the owner liable under the safe-place statute.

We consider that a lengthy discussion of this phase of the law at this time would serve no purpose. The sole question presented is whether the indication by respondent that she herself is unable to testify as to anything which might spell out liability on the part of the appellants, is cause for the entry of a summary judgment dismissing her cause of actipn. We are mindful of the decision of this court that where by positive *281statements a plaintiff forecloses herself from any ability to recover on a stated cause of action, the defendant is entitled to summary judgment. *Marco v. Whiting*(1944), 244 Wis. 621, 12 N. W. (2d) 926. However, the purpose of the statute enabling parties to examine the adverse party under oath before trial is primarily to acquaint the examiner with the testimony that the party sworn will give at the trial so that he may be able to meet such testimony with coun'terproof. Here it is true that the respondent indicated she has no particular knowledge of anything which on its face shows a violation of the safe-place statute. However, the examination was not so conclusive as to preclude her from offering evidence of other witnesses on that point at the time of trial. Likewise, it must be borne in mind that when parties appear before a court commissioner to be examined adversely they are in a position where they answer only the questions submitted to them by opposing counsel. They are not expected to and in fact are not permitted, under the statute, to offer any positive proof. It certainly is not anticipated that a plaintiff must affirmatively establish a cause of action in adverse proceedings before a court commissioner or be, in effect, subject to a motion for nonsuit by means of the application of the summary-judgment statute. It appears that the trial court was correct in denying the appellants’ motion for a summary judgment.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.5
 CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY
RULE 13a-14(a) UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Form 10-K/A No. 2 of S1 Corporation;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Not applicable;4.
    
    Not applicable; and5.
    
    Not applicable.
  /s/ James S. Mahan, III
ICRAS 1403 1845-0022 v10 – Affected Public – Private Institutions 4/29/2014

The Department of Education (the Department) proposes to amend the Student 

Assistance General Provisions regulations issued under the Higher Education Act of 1965, as 

amended (HEA), to implement the changes made by the Violence Against Women 

Reauthorization Act of 2013 (VAWA) (Pub. L. 113-4), which, among other provisions, amended 

section 485(f) of the HEA, otherwise known as the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Security 

Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act (Clery Act). These proposed regulations are a result of 

negotiated rulemaking and would update and clarify the current regulations. 

This is a revision to the current collection due to changed regulatory action that requires 

additional collection and reporting by the institutions. Burden that is impacted is in proposed 

§668.46 (b), §668.46(c) §668.46(j), and §668.46(k). The Department is requesting continued 

approval of the current collection along with consideration of the following revisions

34 CFR §668.46 Institutional security policies and crimes statistics. 

Under proposed §668.46(b) Annual security report, we have revised and expanded 

existing language and added new requirements for items to be reported annually. 

Under proposed §668.46(c), Crime statistics, we have revised and expanded existing 

language and added new reporting requirements for items to be reported in the annual survey.

Under proposed §668.46(j), Programs to prevent dating violence, domestic violence, 

sexual assault, and stalking, we are proposing particular elements of the required description of 

the institution’s programs and ongoing campaigns about prevention and awareness that must be 

included in the institution’s annual security report. 

Under proposed §668.46(k), Procedures for institutional disciplinary action in cases of 

alleged dating violence, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking, we would implement the 

statutory changes requiring an institution that participates in any title IV, HEA program, other 

than a foreign institution, to include a statement of policy in its annual security report addressing 

the procedures for institutional disciplinary action in cases of alleged dating violence, domestic 

violence, sexual assault, or stalking. 

§668.46 New Burden:

Respondents Responses Hours/Response Hours of Burden

Not-For-Profit Institutions 1,854

§668.46 (b) Annual Security

Report

x 2.5 = 4,635

§668.46 (c) Crime Statistics x 1.5 = 2,781

§668.46 (j) Programs/Training x 4 = 7,416

§668.46 (k) 

Procedures/Discipline

x 2.75 = 5,099

Total 19,931
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, David Kalenuik, Chief Executive Officer of
Lake Victoria Mining Company, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                        

|Dated: November 22, 2010 | By: | /s/
      David Kalenuik     
|------------------------ | --- | -----------------------------
|                         |     | David Kalenuik               
|                         |     | Chief Executive Officer      
|                         |     | (Principal Executive Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lake Victoria
Mining Company, Inc. and will be retained by Lake Victoria Mining Company, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
OPM.gov / Telework / Telework Employees

# Telework Employees

Get the information and guidance you need to telework effectively as a federal employee and stay connected to your team

            -  Telework Basics**
Maximize the benefit of telework as a federal employee
Visit Section 
            -  Employee Eligibility**
Find out if you are eligible to participate in your agency's telework program
Visit Section 
            -  Emergency Planning**
Learn more about how telework enhances agencies' continuity of operations
Visit Section 
            -  Work Schedules**
Explore the flexibilities that telework schedules provide employees and agencies
Visit Section 
            -  Telework Quick Tips**
Use these strategies for better meeting etiquette, staying connected virtually, and more
Visit Section 

Find Telework Coordinators
Use this tool to find your agency's work-life coordinator
Telework Employee Training
Learn basic telework concepts and how to be an effective employee in a telework environment
### Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: November 20,2013 Justine Sanchez <jwsanche@hawaii.edu> Thursday, November 21, 2013 12:38 AM EAS (OST) Department of Transportation(DOT)**···~**
I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-yearbidto link Kalaupapato Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experiences friendly agents, frequent flights, multiple islands and east ofbooking via Global Distribution System (expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, Priceline etc.) Itis importantwe have safe, stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa.

1
---

---

EXHIBIT 10.4

INDEPENDENT
  AUDITORS CONSENT

To the Board of
  Directors and Stockholders
  of Retalix Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation
  by reference into the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-14238,
  333-12146, 333-09840 and 333-109874) of Retalix Ltd. (the Company)
  of our report dated January 16, 2002 on the financial statements of Retail Control
  Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for the year ended December
  31, 2001 and for the three months ended December 31, 2000 which appears in this
  Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F/A as of and for the year ending December
  31, 2002.

By: Grossman Yanak
  & Ford LLP

March 23, 2004

---

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. DA 20-0345, DA 20-0346

IN THE MATTER OF: 

LJ. P. AND R.P., 

 Youths In Need Of Care. 

ORDER 

 Upon consideration of the Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record, 

and with good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Mother and Appellant in this matter, N.B., 

shall file a response to this motion within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. 

The response must be served upon all counsel of record, including the Attorney 

General, the County Attorney, and the Appellate Defender’s Office. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court shall give notice of 

this Order by mail to all counsel of record and to Mother and appellant, N.B. at that 

person’s last known address. 

 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

November 16 2020

11/16/2020
#### Roberts, Appellant, vs. Saukville Canning Company, Respondent.

*May 17*

June *15, 1945.*

*278For the appellant there were briefs by *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen,*attorneys, and *Van B. Wake*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Wake.*

*Walter D. Corrigan, Sr.,*and *Morris Karon,*both of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Fowler, J.

The case is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing a garnishee action. The plaintiff seeks to sustain the garnishment as ancillary to an action brought to foreclose a real-estate mortgage, complaint in which demanded a deficiency judgment. There has been no sale of the mortgaged property in the foreclosure suit.

The plaintiff subsequent to' commencement of the foreclosure action commenced an action on the note secured by the mortgage, and the garnishment action was brought in aid of that action. The only summons for garnishment is*279sued was issued in that action. That action was dismissed pursuant to the rule of *Farmers & Merchants Bank v. Matsen,*219 Wis. 401, 263 N. W. 192. In that case an action for foreclosure of a mortgage was commenced that contained a prayer for a deficiency judgment. Subsequently, as here, an action was brought on the note. This court sustained the defense of another action. pending pleaded by answer based on secs. 263.06 and 263.11, Stats., making a complaint demur-rable when it appears on its face-that there is another action “pending between the same parties for the same cause,” and that when a ground of demurrer does not appear from the complaint the objection may be taken by answer. The appellant concedes that under that rule the complaint in the action on the note was properly dismissed.

The appellant seeks to- make the garnishee summons issued in the suit on the note sustain a garnishment action in the instant foreclosure suit. It does not do so. The practice in garnishment actions is specifically declared in ch. 267, Stats. The provisions of that chapter govern the instant case. Sec. 267.15 (1), Stats., provides that if the defendant have judgment in the principal action the garnishee action shall be dismissed with costs. The action to which the garnishee action was ancillary was the suit on the note. That action was -the principal action and that was dismissed. The garnishment action fell with the principal action. And when the garnishment action fell the garnishee summons fell with it.

Also sec. 267.01 (3), Stats., provides that a garnishee action may be commenced in an action for damages founded on contract. An action to foreclose a mortgage is not such an action. *Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius.*If it were conceded that-a foreclosure action wherein a deficiency judgment is asked were such an action, sub. (3) of sec. 267.01 providing that an action may be commenced in garnishment when an execution has issued or is issuable, would still bar garnish*280ment, for an execution is not issuable until the deficiency judgment has been entered.

Other matters discussed in the briefs need not be mentioned because the above controls the disposition of the case.

*By the Court.*— The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Retalix Holdings, Inc.
Plano, Texas

We consent to the incorporation
by reference into the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-110681,
333-125439 and 333-125440) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
333-09840, 333-12146, 333-14238, 333-109874 and 333-118930) of Retalix Ltd. of our reports
dated July 21, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Retalix
Holdings Inc. as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, included in this
Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F/A of Retalix Ltd for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2004.

/s/ Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C.
San Diego, California
July 21, 2006



---

---
DOMINADOR S. BLANCO,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-3222

_____________________________/

Opinion filed May 1, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Mark J. Borello, Judge.

Dominador S. Blanco, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Michael Schaub, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, RAY, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
Adams, Kevin (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Lang, LeAnna <leanna_lang@nps.gov> 

Wednesday, June 05, 2013 4:43 PM 

Devany, Dennis (OST); Adams, Kevin (OST) 

Makani Kai Service 

Aloha Mr. DeVany and Mr. Adams, 

: ;! j; > .. .:: ........ : - .. ,' ·. 

During our community meeting in Kalaupapa, we were notified that we could comment on Makani Kai's service 

to Kalaupapa. 

It has been a real blessing to have Makani Kai servicing Kalaupapa! They have been extremely 

accommodating. Their prices are much more realistic and affordable than that of the previous airline who 

serviced the peninsula under the EAS. And they have, as far as I can tell, much fewer cancellations of f1ights -

at least it seems so to me. 

Perhaps the only criticism I have would be that the time in Honolulu between f1ights on most weekdays (except 

for maybe Monday) is too short to be able to do much of anything. I know that I try to schedule multiple 

appointments (medical, etc.) when I go to O'ahu, and I usually end up having to spend at least one day- if not 

two or more- because of this quick turnaround time (3 hours). By the time you get a taxi and/or your rental car 

and fight O'ahu traffic (and return), you're really lucky to make it to one appointment in those three hours. So 

that just increases the cost for each trip (car rental, motel, meals, etc.) In a perfect world, I would have more 

time scheduled between f1ights on O'ahu. 

As I've already stated, if it were a perfect world that's what I would like to see. That being said, I would like to 

reiterate that I am EXTREMELY happy with the service that the wonderful folks at Makani Kai are offering to 

us! 

LeAnna B. Lang 

Maintenance Support Assistant 

Kalaupapa NHP 

PO Box 2222, Kalaupapa, HI 96742 

P: 808.567.6802, x1312 

F: 808.567.6135 

Email: leanna lang@nps.gov 

1