alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
13.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I,
Omer Bar-Yohai certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to my knowledge, that:



| | 1. | This Annual Report on Form 20-F of Eviation Aircraft
Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date:  May
    16, 2017 | /s/
    Omer Bar-Yohai     
|----------------------- | ---------------------------
|                        | Omer
    Bar-Yohai         
|                        | Chief
    Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 23

                               CONSENT OF KPMG LLP

<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 23

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors
Sound Federal Bancorp, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration  Statements on Form
S-8 (Nos.  333-93215  and  333-112816)  of our report  dated May 21, 2004 on the
consolidated balance sheets of Sound Federal Bancorp,  Inc. and subsidiary as of
March 31, 2004 and 2003,  and the  related  consolidated  statements  of income,
changes  in  stockholders'  equity,  and cash flows for each of the years in the
three-year  period ended March 31, 2004,  which report  appears in the March 31,
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Sound Federal Bancorp, Inc.

\s\ KPMG LLP

Stamford, Connecticut
June 10, 2004
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY 

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING FOR 

CERTIFICATION, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT 

U.S. Department of Energy 

1000 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Washington, DC 20585 

Room GE-086, Large Auditorium 

Thursday, September 30, 2010 

Purpose 

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this informal public meeting to present 

and discuss its proposals regarding certification, compliance, and enforcement regulations for 

certain consumer products and commercial and industrial equipment. These regulations 

provide for sampling plans used in determining compliance with existing standards, 

manufacturer submission of compliance statements and certification reports to DOE, 

maintenance of compliance records by manufacturers, and the availability of enforcement 

actions for improper certification or noncompliance with an applicable standard. In addition, 

the meeting will highlight issues for which DOE has requested feedback from interested 

parties in the notice of proposed rulemaking. 

Agenda 

 9:00 - 9:15 am Welcome 

 Energy-Efficiency and Renewable Energy and Office of the 

General Counsel 

 9:15 - 9:30 am Attendee Introductions and Agenda Review 

 Doug Brookman 

 9:30 - 9:35 am Introduction 

 Ashley Armstrong and Laura Barhydt 

9:35 – 11:00 am Brief Opening Remarks from Interested Parties 

 Doug Brookman 

11:00 - 11:15 am Break 

11:15 – 12:00 pm Scope, Reorganization of DOE’s Existing CCE Regulations, 

Applying DOE’s Existing CCE Regulations to Other Covered 

Products, and Basic Model Provisions 

 Ashley Armstrong and Laura Barhydt
 12:00 - 1:15 pm Lunch (on your own) 

 1:15 – 2:15 pm Certification, Enforcement Testing, Adjudication, Verification 

Testing, Additional Product-Specific Discussion, and Issues for 

which DOE Seeks Comment 

Ashley Armstrong and Laura Barhydt 

 2:15 - 2:30 pm Break 

 2:30 – 3:55 pm Closing Remarks and Questions from Interested Parties 

Doug Brookman

 3:55 – 4:00 pm Next Steps and Closing 

Ashley Armstrong 

 4:00 pm Adjourn
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer   I, Marvin Woods, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AI Document Services, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: November 20, 2015   /s/Marvin Woods Marvin Woods Title: Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2




CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)







In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pro-Tech Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Walsh, Principle Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




Registrant

Pro-Tech Industries, Inc.Date: May 16, 2011

By: /s/ Michael WalshMichael WalshChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Communications Commission [FR ID 255163]
 The following item has been deleted from the list of items scheduled for consideration at the Thursday, October 17, 2024, Open Meeting. Item No. 3 was deleted by the Commission on Tuesday, October 15, 2024. The item was previously listed in the Commission's Sunshine Notice on Thursday, October 10, 2024. Item No.
Bureau
Subject3
Media
Title: Restricted Adjudicatory Matter
                             Summary: The Commission will consider a restricted adjudicatory matter from the Media Bureau.
 Federal Communications Commission. Marlene Dortch, Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2024-24537 Filed 10-22-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712-01-P
EXHIBIT 31.2 CERTIFICATION  I,  Melissa Schessler as Secretary and Treasurer (CFO),  certify  that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Meltdown Massage and Body Works, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date: May 20, 2008 By:/s/ Melissa Schessler Melissa Schessler, Secretary and Treasurer (CFO)
#### 6-8-10 Barrow Street, Inc., Judgment Creditor, *v.*Edwin Pennefather, Judgment Debtor.

City Court of New York, New York County,

September 14, 1936.

*Sol J. Shapiro,*for the judgment creditor.

*Edwin Pennefather, pro se.*

*19Madigan, J.

This motion is denied. The court is satisfied, after hearing the debtor and considering the papers on this motion, that the fund sought to be reached is necessary for the support of himself and his son, a child of eight.

It is evidently the intent of section 792 of the Civil Practice Act that earnings necessary for the support of a debtor’s family be exempt for a period of sixty days following the accrual of same. Such exemption is not lost unless the debtor fails to collect or receive his earnings within sixty days after becoming entitled thereto. The entire article, article 45 of the Civil Practice Act (§ 773 *et seq.),*was revised in 1935 (Laws of 1935, chap. 630). Prior to such revision, supplementary proceedings did not affect after-acquired property. This, however, was changed in 1935. Provisions were then inserted for the purpose of rendering supplementary proceedings applicable to after-acquired property. In the light of that change, present section 792 is to be interpreted.

On this application the creditor contends that under section 792 wages or other compensation for services first becoming payable after the institution of supplementary proceedings cannot be held exempt, even though proved to be necessary for the support of the debtor’s family. The construction thus contended for by the creditor is unreasonable and not in conformity with the legislative intent. The revision of 1935 evidently was not intended to bring about a result such as that for which counsel for the creditor argues in the present instance. If the construction urged by the creditor were adopted, all earnings of any debtor after the institution of a supplementary proceeding relating to him or his property would be applicable in their entirety to the payment of the judgment, without regard to the needs of the debtor’s family. Plainly this is contrary to the public policy of this State as indicated by said section 792 when read in connection with the other pertinent provisions of article 45 of the Civil Practice Act.
### extrapolated cost briefing paper for 11:00 today Ron Evans to: Heidi

_ R.

_ King 11/05/2009 09:37 AM
Cc: Al McGartland, Amy Lamson, Charles Fulcher, Charlotte Bertrand, David Misenheimer, Kathy Kaufman, Larry Sorrels, Nathalie Simon, Neal Fann, Ron Evans, Rosalina Rodriguez, Tom Walton, Lydia Wegman, Tricia Crabtree History: This message has been replied to. Heidi, enclosed is the briefing paper we will use @ 11:00 today to review the background on how we develop extrapolated costs for the various NAAQS over the past few years. Ron Evans Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA Mail Drop C-439-02 919-541-5488 919-541-0839 fax
EXHIBIT 10.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file no. 333-14238, 333-12146, 333-09840,
and 333-109874) and Form F-3 (file no. 333-110681) of Retalix Ltd., of our
report dated January 18, 2002, relating to the consolidated financial
statements of BASS, Inc., for the year ended December 31, 2001, appearing in
the Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F, for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Flagel, Huber, Flagel & Co.

Certified Public Accountants
Dayton, Ohio
June 28, 2004

---

---
#### Lazich, Respondent, vs. Arsenovich, Appellant.

*January 9*

February *7, 1950.*

*298
      *James W. Dorsey*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Drought & Grootemaat*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *O. A. Grootemaat.*

Fairchild, J.

The appellant’s dissatisfaction with the work done by respondent grows out of her feeling of disappointment with the result. However, the work done by the respondent is all in accordance with the contract. This is established by the evidence. There has been painstaking effort by three judges to adjust the matter. Two trials have been had. It is very apparent that the judge presiding at each trial labored under the consciousness that the qualities of certainty and ascertainability were important in the determination of this controversy. The repeated efforts on the part of the court, joined in by attorneys for respondent as well as the several lawyers who appeared at different times for appellant, leave no occasion either for anxiety about *299appellant having had a full opportunity to present her claim or for doubt that the correct decision has been made. The main contention of appellant on this appeal is that the trial court erred in not granting a new trial. It is urged that she should be given a new trial in the interest of justice because she was not represented by counsel and, therefore, her evidence was not properly and completely presented to the court and certain witnesses were not called to testify. While the record conclusively shows that the appellant’s lack of counsel was no one’s fault but her own, it also shows she has not suffered by reason thereof. Several attorneys would have represented her and counseled with her. One attorney adequately represented her in the first trial until she dismissed him for no apparent cause. The case was delayed from time to time at the appellant’s request. The trial judge finally determined the delays were resulting in an injustice to respondent and ordered the trial to proceed.

Appellant cites several cases in which this court granted a new trial when it was shown that the controversy was not fully tried below, but that situation does not exist here. On the contrary, all the relevant issues were considered and decided by the trial court.

Appellant also cites cases holding that lack of counsel by the defendant was ground for granting a new trial. Those cases are beside the point. They are criminal cases in which the defendant had no opportunity to obtain counsel.

Respondent suggests there was never served on him' a proposed bill of exceptions as required by secs. 270.44 and 270.47, Stats. He does not state specifically wherein these sections were not complied with. The record discloses that he received a copy of the proposed bill on December 6, 1948, and that on December 31, 1948, on proof of service and no amendments being offered, the judge signed the certificate settling the bill in accordance with sec. 270.44. There has *300been no motion .to strike the bill. In view of the conclusion reached it is unnecessary to consider this point further.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
Exhibit 13.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Joseph R. Concini, Chief Financial Officer of Millar Western Forest Products
Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as enacted
pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge:

          (i)  the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year
               ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the
               requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
               Act of 1934; and

          (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.

Dated:  June 24, 2005

                                   /s/ Joseph R. Concini
                                   -----------------------
                                   Joseph R. Concini
                                   Chief Financial Officer
<Page>


                              CERTIFICATE OF TRUST

                                       OF

                           HOUSEHOLD CAPITAL TRUST VII


     THIS Certificate of Trust of Household Capital Trust VII (the "Trust")
is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to form a
business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 DEL. C. Section
3801 ET SEQ.) (the "Act").

     1.   NAME. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Household
Capital Trust VII.

     2.   DELAWARE TRUSTEE. The name and business address of the trustee of the
Trust in the State of Delaware is The Bank of New York (Delaware), White Clay
Center, Newark, Delaware 19711.

     3.   EFFECTIVE DATE. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
filing.

     4.   COUNTERPARTS. This Certificate of Trust may be executed in one or more
counterparts.



<Page>


          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate of
Trust in accordance with Section 3811 of the Act.

          BNY MIDWEST TRUST COMPANY,
          as Trustee


          By:       /s/ C. POTTER
               -----------------------------------
               Name:  C. Potter
               Title: Assistant Vice President


          THE BANK OF NEW YORK (DELAWARE),
          as Trustee


          By:      /s/ WILLIAM T. LEWIS
               ------------------------------
               Name:  William T. Lewis
               Title: SVP



               /s/ B. B. MOSS, JR.
          -----------------------------------
          B. B. Moss, Jr.
          as Trustee


               /s/ DENNIS J. MICKEY
          -----------------------------------
          Dennis J. Mickey
          as Trustee


               /s/ STEVEN L. MCDONALD
          -----------------------------------
          Steven L. McDonald
          as Trustee