alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.

Date:  March 30, 2004                Name: /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton
                                           ----------------------------
                                            Sheldon C. Fenton
                                     Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                            Acting Chief Financial Officer
II

Calendar No. 3

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 42

To amend title X of the Public Health Service Act to permit family planning

projects to offer adoption services.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. HELMS introduced the following bill; which was read the first time

JANUARY 20, 1999

Read the second time and placed on the calendar

A BILL

To amend title X of the Public Health Service Act to permit

family planning projects to offer adoption services.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Adoption Serv5 ices Act of 1999’’.

6 SEC. 2. ADOPTION SERVICES.

7 Section 1001(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42

8 U.S.C. 300(a)) is amended by inserting after the first sen-
2

•S 42 PCS

1 tence the following: ‘‘Such projects may also offer adop2 tion services. Any adoption services provided under such

3 projects shall be nondiscriminatory as to race, color, reli4 gion, or national origin.’’.

Calendar No. 3

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 42

A BILL

To amend title X of the Public Health Service Act

tion services.to permit family planning projects to offer adopJANUARY 20, 1999

Read the second time and placed on the calendar
Years Ended December 31,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004Earnings:Income before income taxes
    
    $
    7,088
    
    
    $
    186,565
    
    
    $
    173,082
    
    
    $
    86,711
    
    
    $
    141,238Add: fixed charges
    
    
    21,095
    
    
    
    20,616
    
    
    
    5,020
    
    
    
    4,675
    
    
    
    4,026Total earnings
    
    $
    28,183
    
    
    $
    207,181
    
    
    $
    178,102
    
    
    $
    91,386
    
    
    $
    145,264Fixed charges:Interest expensed
    
    $
    11,170
    
    
    $
    12,291
    
    
    $
    608
    
    
    $
    608
    
    
    $
    731Amortization of debt issuance cost
    
    
    4,313
    
    
    
    3,410
    
    
    
    508
    
    
    
    553
    
    
    
    630Interest component of rental payments (1)
    
    
    5,612
    
    
    
    4,915
    
    
    
    3,904
    
    
    
    3,514
    
    
    
    2,665Total fixed charges
    
    $
    21,095
    
    
    $
    20,616
    
    
    $
    5,020
    
    
    $
    4,675
    
    
    $
    4,026(1)     Estimated at 33% of rental expense as a reasonable approximation of the interest factor.Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    1.3
    
    
    
    10.0
    
    
    
    35.5
    
    
    
    19.5
    
    
    
    36.1
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter  Ended  February 28, 2008 (the  "Report") by
Progressive  Training,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned  hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.




April 14, 2008                          By:  /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                             ---------------------------------
                                             Buddy Young
                                             Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                             Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the quarterly report of Movie Gallery, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended April 6, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Lucinda M. Baier, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: January 8, 2009



|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Lucinda M. Baier                               
|Name: Lucinda M. Baier Its: Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 451 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 451

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENCE.

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law, for purposes of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq.), Saeed Rezai 
shall be held and considered to have been lawfully admitted to the 
United States for permanent residence as of the date of the enactment 
of this Act upon payment of the required visa fee.

SEC. 2. REDUCTION OF NUMBER OF AVAILABLE VISAS.

    Upon the granting of permanent residence to Saeed Rezai as provided 
in this Act, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper officer 
to reduce by one number during the current fiscal year the total number 
of immigrant visas available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1153(a)).

            Passed the Senate September 28 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 451

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

                     For the relief of Saeed Rezai.
```
From: "Van Der Meyden, Henk" <Henk.VanDerMeyden@alcoa.com>

To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: "Palazzolo, Michael A." <Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com>, "Kirkland, Cheryl" <Cheryl.Kirkland@alcoa.com>, "Van Der Meyden, 

Henk" <Henk.VanDerMeyden@alcoa.com>

Date: 01/13/2011 04:56 PM

Subject: Revised Files for Alumax of South Carolina

Rochelle,

Attached, please find the revised kmz, ReleasePoint, and CategoryHAPs

files for the Alumax of South Carolina facility (NEI41217).

<<CategoryHAPs_NEI41217_RevisedJan2011.xls>> 

<<AlumaxOfSouthCarolina_RevisedJan2011.kmz>> 

<<ReleasePoint_NEI41217_revisedJan2011_RoofVentsAsAreaSource.xls>> 

The kmz file includes both the emission points and the property

boundary. The Primary Aluminum MACT Sources are yellow dots; all other

sources are green dots. The coordinates for the sources were corrected

in both the ReleasePoint, and CategoryHAPs sheets.

We used the fugitive (area) source approach to represent the four

Potline Roof Vents and the Anode Bake Oven Roof Vent. Stack Parameters

were adjusted accordingly. Emission rates were reviewed and comments

added as appropriate. In all cases where we made a change or comment,

the cell is shaded red.

Please contact me if any questions arise during the review of this

information.

Best regards,

Henk

Henk van der Meyden, PG

Environmental Manager

Alcoa - Mt. Holly

Office: (843) 572-5361

Cell: (843) 296-3359

Fax: (843) 572-5378
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. No.
333-120944, No. 333-58980, No. 333-55508, No. 333-32560 and No. 333-125421 on
Form S-8 of our reports dated March 14, 2006, relating to the financial
statements, management's assessment on the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Loudeye
Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2005.

/s/ Moss Adams LLP



Seattle, Washington
March 14, 2006
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-31157 Summary Calendar

CATRINA M. REED, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus R.C. JOHNSON, ET AL., Defendants, WESLEY C. JOHNSON, d/b/a African Harvest, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 93-CV-1652 K

- - - - - - - - - - January 14, 1997 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Following a bench trial, the district court found Wesley Johnson and African Harvest, Inc., liable for violating the minimum wage and overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 206 and 207. Johnson argues that theNo. 95-31157 -2- district court erred in striking African Harvest’s brief. African Harvest has not filed a notice of appeal and thus the question whether the district court erred in striking African Harvest’s answer is not properly before us. See Fed. R. App. P. 3(b). Reed’s motion to strike the portions of the brief relating to this issue is GRANTED. Johnson also argues that the district court erred in excluding evidence concerning whether African Harvest was an enterprise exempt from the FLSA provisions under 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(2)(iv) (West 1965), thereby denying Johnson the opportunity to present a defense. This exemption was repealed in 1989. 29 U.S.C. § 213(a)(2) (West Supp. 1996). Johnson’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). The appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous. 5th Cir. R. 42.2. We AWARD Reed appellate attorney’s fees and REMAND to the district court for a determination of the amount of the award.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 418 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 418

                   For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 11, 1999

Ms. Snowe (for herself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                   For the relief of Nancy B. Wilson.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ENTITLEMENT TO WIDOW'S INSURANCE BENEFITS.

    (a) In General.--For purposes of determining the eligibility of 
Nancy B. Wilson, the wife of Alphonse M. Wilson (social security number 
000-00-9548), to widow's insurance benefits under section 202(e) of the 
Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 402(e)), Nancy B. Wilson shall be deemed 
to have been married to Alphonse M. Wilson for a period of not less 
than 9 months immediately prior to the day on which Alphonse M. Wilson 
died.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) shall take effect on March 21, 
1991.
    (c) Payment.--Any benefits to which Nancy B. Wilson is entitled for 
the period prior to the date of the enactment of this Act shall be paid 
to her in a lump sum.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 4.1   Advisory and Consulting Agreement


                              Number of Shares and Options
                              ----------------------------

         4.1(a)                        1,250,000

         4.1(b)                        1,250,000
#### Carley, by Guardian *ad litem,*and another, Appellants, vs. Jewett, Respondent.

*October 12*

November *16, 1948.*

*631For the appellants there was a. brief by *Brindley & Brewer,*attorneys, and *James G. Robb*of Counsel, all of Richland Center, and oral argument by *Mr. Robb.*

*Vernon W. Thomson*of Richland-Center, for the respondent.

Rosenberry, C. J.

In this case the court is equally divided. Mr. Chief Justice Rosenberry, Mr. Justice Fairchild, and Mr. Justice Martin are of the view that the judgment should be affirmed. Mr. Justice Fritz, Mr. Justice Wickhem; and Mr. Justice Hughes are of the view that the judgment should be reversed. This' results in affirmance of the-judgment by a divided court.

By *the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

Broadfoot, J., took no part.
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN

NO. 03-0 7 -00 119 -CR

The St at e of Te xa s , A ppe lla nt

v . Richard How ard, Appellee

F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-06 -20 5190 , HO NORAB LE CHARLES F . BAI RD , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N
The State appea ls the district c ourt’s order g ranting appellee Rich ar d Ho war d’s motion to quash count one of the indictment in this cause a ccusing him o f fe l o n y m urder
. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc
. Ann. art. 44.01(a) (1) (West 2006) (g iving Stat e r i gh t o f appeal); Te x. Pe na l Co de Ann. § 1 9. 02 (b )( 3) (d e fi nin g fe lony mur de r)
. Count on e a lle g e s that H ow a rd , w hil e in the c ours e of c omm itt ing the fe lony of fe ns e of dr ivi ng wh ile int oxic a te d, c omm itt e d a n a c t c le a rl y d a n g e r o u s t o h u m a n l i f

e b y d r i v i n g a m o t o r v e h i c l e o v e r a c u r b a n d s t r i k i n g D o n a l d H a t l e y, causingHatley ’s death. The district court ruled as a matter of law that beca use the off

ense of driving while intox icated doe s not have a cu l p ab l e mental state , it cannot serve as the ba sis for a felony murder pr osecution. Whil e thi s a

pp e a l w a s pen din g , the Te xas C ourt of Cr imi na l A pp e a ls a

nn ounc e d it s decision in Lom ax

v . S tat e , No. PD-0944-06, 2007 Tex. Crim. App. L EXI S 870 (Tex. Crim. App.2

J une 27, 2007). In Lomax , the c ourt he ld t hat se c tio n 1 9. 02 (b )( 3) pla inl y dis pe ns e s w itha

c ulp a ble mental state a

nd that felony

driving while intox i ca t ed ca n b e the under ly ing of fense in a fe lony murder pr osecution. Id . at *1, *7. The court over ruled in par

t the opinion in Ro dr igu e z v . S tat e , 548 S.W .2d 26, 28-29 (Te x . Crim. App. 1977), on which the dist rict cour t relied in this cause
. Id
. at *13-14. In his brief t o this Court, Howard’s c ounsel conc edes tha t the Lomax op ini on is d i s p o s i t i v e a n d

t h a tt h e t r i a l c o u rt ’ s r

u l i n g i s e r r o n e o u s i n l i g h to f

t h i s n e w a

u t h o r i t y. On the author ity

of Lomax , we r ever se the district cour t’s order dismiss ing c ount one of the ind ic tme nt a

nd re mand the c a us e fo r f ur the r p ro c e e din g s.

__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore J ustices Patterson, Pury ear and Pember

ton Reverse d and Remande d Filed: September

26, 2007 Do No t Pu

bli sh
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-7115

ALTONY BROOKS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SERGEANT SHEILA JOHNSTON; CAPTAIN KRIS JACUMIN; SERGEANT 

FELISA FLUDD; BERKELEY COUNTY SHERIFF’S OFFICE,

 Defendants - Appellees,

and

HILL FINKLEA DETENTION CENTER; OFFICER JOHN DOE; NURSE JOHN 

DOE; OFFICER GREENE; OFFICER JOHNSON,

 Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. 

Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (9:15-cv-02677-JFA)

Submitted: August 29, 2022 Decided: September 22, 2022

Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7115 Doc: 18 Filed: 09/22/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
2

Altony Brooks, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher Thomas Dorsel, SENN LEGAL, LLC, 

Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7115 Doc: 18 Filed: 09/22/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
3

PER CURIAM:

Altony Brooks appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his state law claims and 

entering judgment in accordance with the jury’s verdict in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

alleging excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. We have reviewed the 

record and Brooks’ arguments on appeal and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we 

affirm the district court’s judgment. Brooks v. Johnston, No. 9:15-cv-02677-JFA (D.S.C. 

June 25 & July 6, 2021). We deny Brooks’ motions to appoint counsel, for a transcript at 

government expense, for attorney’s fees, for stay of judgment pending appeal, to 

disqualify/recuse Senior United States District Judge Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., and for a 

psychological evaluation. Finally, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 21-7115 Doc: 18 Filed: 09/22/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 4.1




CERTIFICATE No __      For _____ Shares    Received Certificate No.2

Issued to ______________                  For _____________ Shares

____________________________________      on ___________,  __________

Date:     __________________________      By: _______________________


From whom transferred
-------------------------
Date:
     -------------------
  No. Original
   Certificate


  No. of Original
     Shares


  No. of Shares
   Transferred



Number                          CERTIFICATE
  2





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           THE JACKSON RIVERS COMPANY
                              FLORIDA CORPORATION

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 100,000,000 Shares of Common Stock Authorized

                           Par Value $.001 per share



This Certifies that ___________________________________

Is hereby issued ___________________________________________ fully paid

And non-assessable Shares of the Capital Stock of the above named Corporation
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder in person or by
duly authorized Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.


In Witness Whereof, this Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed
by its duly authorized officer(s) this ____ day of
                                                   ----------------, ------.



---------------------                        ---------------------
Secretary                                    President
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Please attach the following grant letter to Alan Core (Docket No. FAA-2015-5275)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  Infinicall   Corporation  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robin
Glanzl, President of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robin Glanzl

President

August 29, 2005
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MovieGallery, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 5,2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report’), I,J. Steven Roy, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to my knowledge:

###### ** **

###### **(1)**                               The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

###### **(2)**                               The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof the Company.

 

 
| /s/  J. Steven Roy |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| J. Steven Roy           |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| November 19, 2003       |

 

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company andwill be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.

 

----