alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the quarterly report of Commercial E-Waste Management, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Anna Chalmers, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Anna Chalmers


Anna Chalmers


Chief Executive Officer


Chief Financial Officer


November 12, 2010
#### Gaber (Frank), Respondent, vs. Balsiger and another, Appellants.

*May 18*

June *16, 1943.*

*316*J. G. McWilliams*of Janesville and *W. A. Loveland*of Monticello, for the appellants.

*Lamboley & Lamboleyoi*Monroe and *Stroud, Stebbins & Wingert*of Madison, for the respondent.

Barlow, J.

Appellants contend that even though the notice of appeal in separate actions was served as one notice of appeal, respondent was fully informed of the judgments and orders appealed from, and that the treatment of those actions as though they had been consolidated for the purpose of appeal has in no way harmed respondents.

The notice of appeal is part of the record in the Frank Gaber action. There is no notice of appeal included in the record of the Barbara Gaber action. The receipts which were issued by the clerk of court offer no help in clearing the record, and the certificate of the clerk of court attached to these receipts sets forth that they are the original receipts filed in the action “Frank Gaber and Barbara Gaber, plaintiffs, v. Sam Balsiger and Mary Balsiger, defendants.”

No return on appeal was filed with this court in either action as required by the rules. This court necessarily has discretionary powers in requiring compliance with the rules governing appeals, and will give reasonable opportunity to correct errors which have been occasioned through mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect, on such terms as may be just. Supreme Court Rule 61. However, it is difficult to see just how and where one would begin to correct the errors in these appeals. If only one action was involved, it could be approached with much less difficulty. Some ordérly procedure must be followed in order to perfect appeals to this court. As appellants failed to cause the proper return to be made to this court within the twenty-day period as required by Rule 4 of the Rules, plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the appeal because of that failure is granted. t

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary information extracted from the consolidated
statements of operations and consolidated balance sheets of Mediacom LLC and it
subsidiaries and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial
statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000
       
<S>                                                   <C>             
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         12-MOS          
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                       DEC-31-1998   
<PERIOD-START>                                          JAN-01-1998   
<PERIOD-END>                                            DEC-31-1998   
<CASH>                                                        2,212   
<SECURITIES>                                                      0   
<RECEIVABLES>                                                 2,810   
<ALLOWANCES>                                                    298   
<INVENTORY>                                                   8,240   
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                  0   
<PP&E>                                                      314,627   
<DEPRECIATION>                                              (45,423)  
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                              451,152   
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                             0   
<BONDS>                                                           0   
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                             0   
<PREFERRED>                                                       0   
<COMMON>                                                          0   
<OTHER-SE>                                                   78,651   
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                451,152   
<SALES>                                                     129,297   
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                            129,297   
<CGS>                                                        43,849   
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                               141,035   
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                              4,058   
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                  0   
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                           23,994   
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                             (39,790)  
<INCOME-TAX>                                                      0   
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                         (39,790)  
<DISCONTINUED>                                                    0   
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                   0   
<CHANGES>                                                         0   
<NET-INCOME>                                                (39,790)  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                     0   
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                     0   
        

</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
  Mediacom
    LLC
  Schedule
    of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
  For the Years Ended December 31,2006


2005


2004


2003


2002(In thousands, except ratio amounts)Earnings:(Loss) income before income taxes

$
(19,419
)

$
(4,294
)

$
8,976


$
(42,490
)

$
(105,107
)Interest expense, net


112,895



102,000



97,790



98,596



102,458Amortization of capitalized
    interest


1,702



1,525



1,356



1,580



497Amortization of debt issuance costs


2,427



3,009



5,642



3,320



3,754Interest component of rent
    expense(1)


2,716



2,776



2,623



2,342



2,136Earnings available for fixed
    charges

$
100,321


$
105,016


$
116,387


$
63,348


$
3,738Fixed Charges:Interest expense, net


112,895


$
102,000


$
97,790


$
98,596


$
102,458Capitalized interest


1,893



2,106



1,545



3,532



2,723Amortization of debt issuance costs


2,427



3,009



5,642



3,320



3,754Interest component of rent
    expense(1)


2,716



2,776



2,623



2,342



2,136Total fixed charges

$
119,931


$
109,891


$
107,600


$
107,790


$
111,071Ratio of earnings to fixed charges










1.08







Deficiency of earnings over fixed
    charges

$
(19,610
)

$
(4,875
)

$



$
(44,442
)

$
(107,333
)     (1)
    
    A reasonable approximation (one-third) is deemed to be the
    interest factor included in rental expense.
Exhibit 99.18


CONSENT








Ladies
and Gentlemen:








The
undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the
undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in
the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection
with the report entitled “Technical Report with an Updated
Mineral Resource Estimate for the Midwest Property, Northern
Saskatchewan, Canada” dated March 26, 2018, and (2) all other
references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines
Corp.








Dated:
March 28, 2018





(Signed)
“Chad
Sorba”


__________________________


Chad
Sorba, P.Geo.


Denison
Mines Corp.
|   | (1) | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                |                                                                                                                 |
|--------|---------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  | March      31, 2009 |                                                                                                                 | /s/      Frederick L. Hickman |
|   |                | Frederick      L. Hickman                                                                                            |
|   |                | President      and Chief Executive Officer(Principal      Executive Officer and Acting Principal Financial  Officer) |
|   |

----
### Cyclanilide (026201) Cal. DPR Usage Data
Publicly available data from the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (CADPR) was used to produce the following table outlining the pounds of Cyclanilide used in California over the three most recent years available (2006 - 2008).

Commodity 2006 Pounds App lied 2007 Pounds A pp lied 2008 Pounds App lied COTTON, GENERAL 2107.31 2249.42 1999.24 Grand Total 2107.31 2249.42 1999.24 Date Prepared: May 26, 2010 Cal DPR Data: http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/pur/purmain.htm
Exhibit 99.16

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned company hereby consents
to (1) the references to the undersigned companys name included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled Technical
Report on the Midwest A Uranium Deposit of Saskatchewan, Canada dated January 31, 2008 and (2) all other references to the undersigned company included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement in the Annual Report
on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp.

Dated: March 19, 2014



|                                                              |  |                                         
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|SGS Canada Inc. (formerly Geostat
Systems International Inc.)
|                                                              | 
|By:                                                           |  | /s/ Guy Desharnais                      
|Name:                                                         |  | Guy Desharnais, Ph.D., P.Geo            
|Title:                                                        |  | Technical Manager of Geological Services
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3062 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3062

   To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District of Columbia 
 submits a performance accountability plan to Congress, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 18, 2000

  Mr. Voinovich (for himself and Mr. Durbin) introduced the following 
      bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                          Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District of Columbia 
 submits a performance accountability plan to Congress, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN.

    Section 456 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (section 47-
231 et seq. of the District of Columbia Code) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ``Not later than 
                March 1 of each year (beginning with 1998)'' and 
                inserting ``Concurrent with the submission of the 
                District of Columbia budget to Congress each year 
                (beginning with 2001)''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ``that describe 
                an acceptable level of performance by the government 
                and a superior level of performance by the 
                government''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ``1999'' and 
                inserting ``2001''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ``for an 
                acceptable level of performance by the government and a 
                superior level of performance by the government''.
                                 <all>
```
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 109,512

In the Matter of S USAN L. B OWMAN

,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISCHARGE FROM PROBATION

On October 18, 2013, this court suspended the respondent ' s license to practice law

for a period of 12 months. The court ordered that the respondent undergo a reinstatement

hearing prior to consideration of reinstatement. See In re Bowman

, 298 Kan. 231, 310

P.3d 1054 (2013).

Following a reinstatement hearing, on November 24, 2015 , this court granted the

respondent ' s petition for reinstatement and reinstated the respondent ' s license to practice

law, subject to a term of probation.

On November 21, 2018, t he respondent filed a motion for discharge from

probation, along with affidavits demonstrating compliance with the terms of probation.

On November 28, 2018, the Disciplinary A dministrator filed a response, confirm ing that

the respondent fully complied with the conditions imposed upon h er by the court and

offer ing no objection to the re spondent ' s discharge from probation.

This court, having reviewed the motion, the affidavits, and the re sponse of the

D isciplinary A dministrator, finds that the respondent should be discharged from

probation.2

I T I S T HEREFORE O RDERED that the respondent is discharged from probation and

from any further obligation in this matter and this proceeding is closed.

I T I S F URTHER O RDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports

and that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent

.

Dated this 9 th day of J anuary, 2019

.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ads In Motion, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended August 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Edward F. Myers III,
as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: 10/1/08                               By: /s/ Edward F. Myers III
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Edward F. Myers III
                                               Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 14 OF BEXAR COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before our Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas on September 23, 2015, the cause upon appeal to

revise or reverse your judgment between

Roberto Flores-Morales, Appellant(s)

V.

The State of Texas, Appellee(s)

No. 04-14-00867-CR and Tr. Ct. No. 447516

was determined, and therein our Court of Appeals made its order in these words:

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Fourth

District of Texas, in this behalf and in all things have the order duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

Witness the Hon. Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals for the Fourth District of Texas,

with the seal of the Court affixed and the City of San Antonio on November 23, 2015.

KEITH E. HOTTLE, CLERK

Cynthia A. Martinez

Deputy Clerk, Ext. 53853
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3276 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3276

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To make technical corrections to the College Scholarship Fraud 
    Prevention Act of 2000 and certain amendments made by that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE COLLEGE SCHOLARSHIP FRAUD 
              PREVENTION ACT OF 2000.

    (a) Sentencing Enhancement Guidelines.--Section 3 of the College 
Scholarship Fraud Prevention Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-240) is 
amended--
            (1) by striking ``obtaining or providing of'' and inserting 
        ``the obtaining of, the offering of assistance in obtaining''; 
        and
            (2) by striking ``base offense level for 
        misrepresentation'' and inserting ``enhanced penalties provided 
        for in the Federal sentencing guidelines for an offense 
        involving fraud or misrepresentation''.
    (b) Limitation on Exempt Property.--Section 522(c)(4) of title 11, 
United States Code, as added by section 4 of the College Scholarship 
Fraud Prevention Act of 2000, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``in the obtaining or providing of'' and 
        inserting ``or misrepresentation in the providing of, the 
        offering of assistance in obtaining, or the furnishing of 
        information to a consumer on,''; and
            (2) by striking ``(20 U.S.C. 1001)''.
    (c) Effective Date; Application of Amendments.--
            (1) Effective date.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
        this section and the amendments made by this section shall take 
        effect on November 1, 2000.
            (2) Application of section 552(c)(4) of title 11, united 
        states code.--Section 522(c)(4) of title 11, United States 
        Code, as added by section 4 of the College Scholarship Fraud 
        Prevention Act of 2000 and as amended by subsection (b) of this 
        section, shall apply only with respect to cases commenced under 
        title 11, United States Code, on or after November 1, 2000.

            Passed the Senate December 15 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3276

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To make technical corrections to the College Scholarship Fraud 
    Prevention Act of 2000 and certain amendments made by that Act.
```
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

COMAIR, INC.

for renewal of an exemption 49 U.S.C. § 40109 (United States-Bahamas) Docket OST-2006-26123

APPLICATION OF COMAIR, INC. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Communications with respect to this document should be addressed to:

Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs
& Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC. 1212 New York Avenue NW, Suite 200 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 842-4184 sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com

Special Counsel for Comair, Inc.

July 5, 2011BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

Application of

COMAIR, INC.

for renewal of an exemption 49 U.S.C. § 40109 (United States-Bahamas) Docket OST-2006-26123

APPLICATION OF COMAIR, INC. FOR RENEWAL OF AN EXEMPTION

Comair, Inc. (“Comair”), pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 40109 and 14 C.F.R. Part 377,

hereby requests renewal of its U.S.-Bahamas open skies exemption. These authorities

enable Comair to offer scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail

on the subject routes. Comair requests renewal of its exemption for a period of at least

two years.

The relief requested by Comair is in the public interest for the same reasons that

supported the original issuance of the original exemptions. In filing this application,

Comair invokes the automatic extension provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5

U.S.C. 558 (c), as implemented by 14 C.F.R. Part 377. Comair’s renewal application is

timely filed under 14 C.F.R. 377.10 (c).Application of Comair, Inc. Page 2

Respectfully submitted,

Alexander Van der Bellen Managing Director, Government Affairs
& Associate General Counsel

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

Special Counsel for Comair, Inc.CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 5th day of July, 2011, a copy of the foregoing

Application of Comair, Inc. was served upon the following persons via email:

anbird@fedex.com
anita.mosner@hklaw.com benjamin.slocum@usairways.com
bill@mietuslaw.com Robert.cohn@hoganlovells.com bob.kneisley@wnco.com brian.hedberg@dot.gov BTHunt@pncl.com
carl.nelson@aa.com
dan.weiss@united.com dhainbach@ggh-airlaw.com Dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil efaberman@wileyrein.com esta.rosenberg@dot.gov gmurphy@crowell.com howard_kass@usairways.com jeffrey.manley@united.com jhill@dowlohnes.com john.allen@faa.gov jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com jyoung@yklaw.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com
matwood@sherblackwell.com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com mroller@rollerbauer.comm mlbenge@zsrlaw.com
msinick@ssd.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com rpommer@atlasair.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com
slachter@lachter-clements.com ben.graves@evergreenairlines.com
brian.Gillman@mesa-air.com cdonley@ssd.com dkirstein@yklaw.com jegillick@zsrlaw.com john.Fredericksen@suncountry.com john.palo@evergreenairlines.com lhalloway@crowell.com
mcmillin@woa.com mwiegele@nac.aero patrick.rizzi@hoganlovells.com ranjit.seth@evergreenairlines.com robert.land@jetblue.com temerson@skywest.com
info@airlineinfo.com pdoell@naca.cc