alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 4.7

                                Fourth Amendment
                                     to the
                           Soligen Technologies, Inc.
                             1993 Stock Option Plan


        The following amendment to the Soligen Technologies, Inc. 1993 Stock
Option Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), was approved by the Shareholders of
Soligen Technologies, Inc. on August 24, 2001:

        1. The first sentence of Section 4.1 of the Plan shall be amended to
read as follows:

               "The Committee, from time to time, may provide for the option and
               sale in the aggregate of up to eight million shares of Common
               Stock, to be made available from authorized, but unissued, or
               reacquired shares of Common Stock."



                                        6
I, Lindsay Gorrill, the President, CEO and Chief Financial Officer of Star Gold Corp. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterlyl Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  September 14, 2009/s/Lindsay GorrillBy:Lindsay GorrillPresident, CEOand Chief Financial Officer
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 52 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-63505) pertaining to Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 53 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-63505) and Amendment No. 371 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-05721), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln National Variable Annuity Account H for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6358

GEORGE CARTER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. J. PATRICIA WILSON SMOOT; BRICK TRIPP; MELISSA WEST; PATRICIA HALLEY; G. SECTON; S.A. ASKEW , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:17

- ct

- 03024

- BO )

Submitted : September 28, 2018 Decided: October 9, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
George E. Carter, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: George E. Carter app eals the district court’s order dismissing under 28 U .S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012) his civil rights complaint, which the court construed as filed pursuant

to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Carter v. Smoot , No. 5:17

- ct

03024

- BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 22, 2018) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Accesstel, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ralph Sayad, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


                                           /s/ Ralph Sayad
                                           ---------------------------
                                           Ralph Sayad
                                           Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Principal Financial Officer

June 20, 2006
Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LaPorte Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                     
|----------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|November 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Lee A. Brady                                    
|Date              |  |  |  | Lee A. Brady                                        
|                  |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                  |  |  |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                               
|                  |  | 
|November 12, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/ Michele M. Thompson                             
|Date              |  |  |  | Michele M. Thompson                                 
|                  |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                  |  |  |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                               

This certification accompanies each report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



46
**CERTIFICATION      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND      PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1. | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending July 31,                2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending July 31, 2007, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Bip Oil, Inc. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

*/s/ Bobby      Stanley           *
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3127

To protect infants who are born alive.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. SANTORUM (for himself, Mr. HUTCHINSON, and Mr. FITZGERALD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To protect infants who are born alive.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Born-Alive Infants

5 Protection Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF BORN-ALIVE INFANT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol9 lowing:
2

•S 3127 IS

1 ‘‘§ 8. ‘Person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘individual’

2 as including born-alive infant

3 ‘‘(a) In determining the meaning of any Act of Con4 gress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the

5 various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United

6 States, the words ‘person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘in7 dividual’, shall include every infant member of the species

8 homo sapiens who is born alive at any stage of develop9 ment.

10 ‘‘(b) As used in this section, the term ‘born alive’,

11 with respect to a member of the species homo sapiens,

12 means the complete expulsion or extraction from its moth13 er of that member, at any stage of development, who after

14 such expulsion or extraction breathes or has a beating

15 heart, pulsation of the umbilical cord, or definite move16 ment of voluntary muscles, regardless of whether the um17 bilical cord has been cut, and regardless of whether the

18 expulsion or extraction occurs as a result of natural or

19 induced labor,caesarean section, or induced abortion.’’.

20 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections

21 at the beginning of chapter 1 of title 1, United States

22 Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new

23 item:

‘‘8. ‘Person’, ‘human being’, ‘child’, and ‘individual’ as including born-alive infant.’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeshare Holdings, Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






August
      8, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Paul
      ThompsonPaul
      ThompsonChief
      Executive Officer
|   |  Exhibit32.2 |
|--------|-------------------|

|   | CERTIFICATION PURSUANTTO |
|--------|--------------------------|

|   | 18      U.S.C. § 1350 |
|--------|----------------------------|

|   | AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 10.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Retalix Holdings, Inc.
Plano, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file no. 333-14238, 333-12146, 333-09840,
and 333-109874) and Form F-3 (file no. 333-110681) of Retalix Ltd. (the
Company) of our report dated March 31, 2004, relating to the financial
statements of Retalix Holdings, Inc., appearing in the Companys Annual Report
on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Nation Smith Hermes Diamond, APC

San Diego, California
June 28, 2004

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Retalix Holdings, Inc.
Plano, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file no. 333-14238, 333-12146, 333-09840,
and 333-109874) and Form F-3 (file no. 333-110681) of Retalix Ltd. (the
Company) of our report dated February 5, 2002, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Retalix USA, Inc., appearing in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 20-F as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Nation Smith Hermes Diamond, APC

San Diego, California
June 28, 2004

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS

Retalix Holdings, Inc.
Plano, Texas

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file no. 333-14238, 333-12146, 333-09840,
and 333-109874) and Form F-3 (file no. 333-110681) of Retalix Ltd. (the
Company) of our report dated February 1, 2003, relating to the consolidated
financial statements of Retalix Holdings, Inc., appearing in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 20-F as of and for the year ended December 31, 2003.

/s/ Nation Smith Hermes Diamond, APC

San Diego, California
June 28, 2004

---

---
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 15

- 00454

- CR

Thomas George Craaybeek

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 90th District Court

o f Young County (10573 )

August 26, 2016

Opinion by Ju stice Walker

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

__ /s/ Sue Walker

___________________ Justice Sue Walker
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,665
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,354
<INVENTORY>                                     12,084
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,245
<PP&E>                                          36,398
<DEPRECIATION>                                  20,210
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  90,014
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           18,095
<BONDS>                                        228,736
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           41,684
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            15
<OTHER-SE>                                   (200,013)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    90,014
<SALES>                                        104,694
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               104,694
<CGS>                                           64,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   64,952
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                12,946
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   686
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              25,278
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    832
<INCOME-TAX>                                       621
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                211
<DISCONTINUED>                                (16,144)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (15,933)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
#### Will of Razall: Mathiowetz, Trustee, Appellant, vs. Razall and another, Respondents.

*April 15*

May *18, 1943.*

*153
      *Bernard F. Mathiowe'tz, in pro. per.,*for the appellant.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Arthur K. Heller- ■ mann, in pro. per.,*attorney, and *Bernard Soref*of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Joseph P. Brazy*and *Mr. Heller-rhann,*all of Milwaukee.

Fairchild, J.

The question involved in this appeal is whether the county court erred in overruling the trustee’s contention that the respondent’s claim for fees for services rendered to the beneficiary of the trust did not come within the terms of the trust. The services consisted of defending the beneficiary in proceedings in which he was found guilty *154of contempt for failure to pay alimony, and was sentenced to four months in the house of correction, which sentence was suspended pending an appeal in which respondent is also participating. That the beneficiary is entitled to be defended in an action of this sort under the terms of the trust which provides for his “proper care” seems clear. Perusal of the will setting up the trust shows that the primary intent of the testatrix was to provide for her son, the beneficiary. She provided that the whole of the corpus could be used if necessary for his care. It is evident that she chose the trust device for the sole purpose of keeping her property out of the hands of the divorced wife of her son. Except for that desire, she intended her son to be taken care of generously, and the very narrow construction of “proper care” so as to exclude his defense in a court proceeding s'o as to keep him out of jail is certainly not warranted.

It is also clear, however, that the beneficiary cannot go out and hire his own attorney with no notice to the trustee and thus impose the obligation to pay on the trustee. He must first request help from the trustee. Until he does, there is no basis for a -claim against the trust estate and neither is there any basis for interference by the court. Sec. 187, Restatement, 1 Trusts, provides:

> “Where discretion is conferred upon the trustee with respect'to the exercise of a power, its exercise is not subject to control by the court, except to prevent an abuse by the trustee of his discretion.”

Until the trustee has refused assistance to the beneficiary there can be no question of an abuse of discretion. The record is not clear as to whether a demand was made on the trustee, and if so, when it was made. The case must therefore be remanded to the county court for further proceedings.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3145 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3145

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment 
under the tax-exempt bond rules of prepayments for certain commodities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 2 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

  Mr. Breaux introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment 
under the tax-exempt bond rules of prepayments for certain commodities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Municipal Utility Fairness Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. ARBITRAGE RULES NOT TO APPLY TO PREPAYMENTS FOR NATURAL GAS AND 
              OTHER COMMODITIES.

    (a) In General.--Subsection (b) of section 148 of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 (defining higher yielding investments) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Exception for certain prepayments to ensure commodity 
        supply.--The term `investment property' shall not include a 
        prepayment by an issuer of bonds in order to ensure the supply 
        of a commodity necessary to, and used in a business of, a 
        governmental unit.''
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall take 
effect as if included in the amendments made by section 1301 of the Tax 
Reform Act of 1986.
                                 <all>
```