alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         51,367
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  204,178
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               151,167
<PP&E>                                         46,227
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (6,447)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 948,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          309,949
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    17,248
<COMMON>                                       21,533
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,706,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   948,683
<SALES>                                        427,439
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0
<CGS>                                          254,253
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  178,337
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,151)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   0
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 400 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-106, K2025-104.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24623 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0584

_________________ STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. NICK LENIER WILSON,

Defendant and Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ Appellant Nick Lenier Wilson was granted an extension of time to file and serve Appellant’s opening brief on or before March 3 , 202 1 . The opening brief is now overdue. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Appellant shall prepare, file and serve the opening brief on appeal no later than March 31, 2021 . Failure to file the brief within that time will result in dismissal of this appeal with prejudice and without further notice. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 11 2021

03/11/2021
Case Number: DA 19-0584
#### Graham Sanford, Respondent, v Computing Group, Also Known as TCG, Now Known as Identex Limited, et al., Appellants.

[772 NYS2d 599]

*467In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract and fraud, the defendants appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Dunn, J.), dated May 6, 2003, as denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the complaint is dismissed.

The plaintiff conceded that he signed an employment contract with the defendant Computing Group, also known as TCG, now known as Identex Limited. The contract provided for a six-month probationary period. When the plaintiffs employment was terminated within the first six months of his employment, he commenced this action, inter alia, for breach of contract and fraud, contending that the defendants agreed to employ him for a term beyond the probationary period. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The Supreme Court erred in denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. Notwithstanding the defendants’ failure to proffer a signed copy of the employment contract, the contract was enforceable against the plaintiff as he admitted signing it, and performed under its terms *(see Newburger v American Sur. Co.,*242 NY 134 [1926]; *Allen v National Video,*610 F Supp 612, 631 [1985]).

Moreover, as the contract was clear, complete, and unambiguous, it should have been enforced according to its terms. The plaintiffs contention that the probationary period did not apply to him was based on inadmissible extrinsic evidence *(W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri,*77 NY2d 157, 162 [1990]; *Del Vecchio v Cohen,*288 AD2d 426 [2001]; *Blumenreich v North Shore Health Sys.,*287 AD2d 529 [2001]).

In addition, the cause of action for fraud should have been dismissed as the only fraud alleged related to the claim for breach of contract *(see Jim Longo, Inc. v Rutigliano,*251 AD2d 547 [1998]).

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23743]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2300-052]

Great Lakes Hydro America, LLC; Notice of Availability of Final 
Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) 
regulations, 18 CFR part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has 
reviewed the application for license for the Shelburne Hydroelectric 
Project, located on the Androscoggin River in Coos County, New 
Hampshire and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for 
the project. No Federal land is occupied by project works or located 
within the project boundary.
    The FEA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental 
impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with 
appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a 
major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the 
human environment.
    The Commission provides all interested persons with an opportunity 
to view and/or print the FEA via the internet through the Commission's 
Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov/), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter 
the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number 
field, to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online 
Support at [email protected], or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, 
or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.
    You may also register online at https://ferconline.ferc.gov/eSubscription.aspx to be notified via email of new filings and 
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, 
contact FERC Online Support.
    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Ryan Hansen 
at (202) 502-8074 or [email protected].

    Dated: October 8, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-23743 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
```
Prepared by MERRILL CORPORATION




QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

EXHIBIT 10.7  


 
 

FORM OF PROMISSORY NOTE    
  



	$[AMOUNT]	 	Palo Alto, California

[DATE]





    For
value received, the undersigned promises to pay to PayPal, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), at its principal office the principal sum of  $[AMOUNT] with interest from the date hereof at
a rate of 5.02% per annum, compounded annually, on the unpaid balance of such
principal sum. Such principal and interest shall be due and payable on [DATE]. 


    If
the undersigned's employment or consulting relationship with the Company is terminated prior to payment in full of this Note, this Note shall be immediately due and payable. 



    Principal
and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of America. AMOUNTS DUE UNDER THIS NOTE MAY BE PREPAID AT ANY TIME WITHOUT PREMIUM OR PENALTY. 


    Should
suit be commenced to collect any sums due under this Note, such sum as the Court may deem reasonable shall be added hereto as attorneys' fees. The undersigned and any endorsers
have severally waived presentment for payment, protest, notice of protest and notice of nonpayment of this Note. 



    This
note, which is non-recourse, is secured by a pledge of certain shares of Common Stock and is subject to the terms of a Loan, Pledge and Option Agreement between the undersigned
and the Company of even date herewith. 



	 	 	
[NAME]











QuickLinks


FORM OF PROMISSORY NOTE
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                        5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Form 10K and
is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-2000
<CASH>                                            5,595,595
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       601,296
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  9,990,993
<PP&E>                                              120,146
<DEPRECIATION>                                      627,605
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   23,162,291
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             3,324,277
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                341
<OTHER-SE>                                        9,733,473
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     23,162,291
<SALES>                                                   0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,109,704
<CGS>                                               291,285
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                     2,946,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  393,969
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (3,884,937)
<INCOME-TAX>                                          1,049
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (3,885,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (4,911,528)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.15)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.15)


</TABLE>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-1815
WILSONIA E. GORHAM, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus CATALYTICA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-01-104-H-4) Submitted: November 19, 2003 De cided: February 23, 2004 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Wilsonia E. Gorham, Appellant Pro Se. Zebulon Dyer Anderson, SMITH, ANDERSON, BLOUNT, DORSETT, MITCHELL & JERNIGAN, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Wilsonia E. Gorham appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of her former employer in her civil action in which she alleged her employment was terminated in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeGorham v. Catalytica Pharmaceuticals, Inc. , No. CA-01-104-H-4 (E.D.N.C. May 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument b ecause the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                                3193
<SECURITIES>                                          2367
<RECEIVABLES>                                        24752
<ALLOWANCES>                                         (1264)
<INVENTORY>                                          47408
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     83688
<PP&E>                                               31347
<DEPRECIATION>                                      (14552)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                      119770
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                66275
<BONDS>                                              10000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               111
<OTHER-SE>                                           25837
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                        119770
<SALES>                                               2271
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                      2271
<CGS>                                                 2088
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                         7576
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                      (384)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    1114
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      (8123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         (2844)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  (5055)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         (5055)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        (0.45)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 05-3068

___________ Ty S. Mitchell; Kimberly S. Mitchell, * * Appellants, * * Christopher Mauer; Mary Jo Mauer; * James L. Engstrom; Kathleen P. * Engstrom, * * Appeal from the United States Plaintiffs, * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. v. * * [PUBLISHED] * Beneficial Loan & Thrift Company, * a Minnesota corporation, * * Appellee, * * Household Industrial Finance * Company, * * Defendant. *

___________ Submitted: May 18, 2006 Filed: June 21, 2006

___________ Before MURPHY, BEAM, and BENTON, Circuit Judges

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable James M. Rosenbaum, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Minnesota. -2- The district court 1 granted summary judgment to Beneficial Loan & Thrift Company. Ty S. Mitchell and Kimberly S. Mitchell appeal.
The Mitchells assert that Beneficial vi olated the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA). HOEPA, as rele vant here, requires creditors to make additional disclosures to borrowers if the total points and fees payable at closing exceed 8 percent of the total loan amount, or $400, whichever is greater. 15 U.S.C. §§ 1602(aa)(1)(B), 1639(a). The Mitchells argue that the $355 appraisal fee, $821 title insurance fee, $67 phone-bill charge, or$1,178 principal disbursement should be included in the total points and fees of thei r loan. If any one of these were included, the total points and fees would exceed 8 pe rcent of the total loan amount, making the loan subject to HOEPA. Appraisal and title insurance fees, if bona fide and reasonable, are excluded from HOEPA's definition of total points a nd fees. 15 U.S.C. § 1605(e) ; 12 C.F.R. § 226.4(c)(7). On appeal, the Mitche lls claim that these fees are not bona fide and not reasonable because they viol ate the Real Estate Settleme nt Procedures Act (RESPA), 12 U.S.C. § 2607(b). The district court correctly found that these fees did not violate RESPA because they were paid to an una ffiliated third party for services actually performed, and, in any event, Beneficia l derived no benefit from the payments. See Haug v. Bank of America , 317 F.3d 832, 836 (8 thCir. 2003). As for the telephone charge and principal disbursement, the statute does not include them in total points and fees. 15 U.S.C. § 1602(aa)(4). Th e Mitchells' loan did not need HOEPA disclosures. After de novo review, see Kerns v. Capital Graphics, Inc. , 178 F.3d 1011, 1016 (8 thCir. 1999), this court affirms the district court's judgment.

______________________________
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM BALANCE
SHEET STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO
SUCH 10-K.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          38,936
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,490
<ALLOWANCES>                                      (92)
<INVENTORY>                                      1,132
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                44,231
<PP&E>                                           2,043
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (863)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  45,411
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            4,134
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           105
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    45,411
<SALES>                                         17,881
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                17,881
<CGS>                                           10,026
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                13,372
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               (922)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,595)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,595)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,595)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.04)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.04)


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dean E. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Dean E. Miller
-------------------

Dean E. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
March 1, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re Group
Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 21.5

SUBSIDIARIES OF VERIDIEN CORPORATION

         A)       Rost Inc. - incorporated in Florida (dormant)

         B)       Rost Medical Development, Inc. - incorporated in Delaware
                  (dormant)

         C)       Marquit Manufacturing Specialties, Inc. - incorporated in
                  Delaware (dormant)

         D)       Veridien.com Inc. - incorporated in Delaware (dormant)

         E)       Norpak (U.S.), Inc. - incorporated in Delaware

         F)       The SunSwipe Corporation, L.L.C. - incorporated in Delaware

         G)       Communications Gear, Inc. - incorporated in Delaware (dormant)

The above-named subsidiaries which are operational conduct business solely under
the listed names.