alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Craig J. Cerny, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Harrington West FinancialGroup, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and
133

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal controls over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2006          /s/ Craig J. Cerny Craig J. Cerny, Chief Executive Officer
134
extrapolated cost briefing paper for 11:00 today

Ron Evans to: Heidi_R._King 11/05/2009 09:37 AM

Cc:

Al McGartland, Amy Lamson, Charles Fulcher, Charlotte Bertrand, 

David Misenheimer, Kathy Kaufman, Larry Sorrels, Nathalie Simon, 

Neal Fann, Ron Evans, Rosalina Rodriguez, Tom Walton, Lydia 

Wegman, Tricia Crabtree

History: This message has been replied to.

Heidi, enclosed is the briefing paper we will use @ 11:00 today to review the background on how we 

develop extrapolated costs for the various NAAQS over the past few years.

Ron Evans

Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group

HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA

Mail Drop C-439-02

919-541-5488

919-541-0839 fax
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6429

JOSHUA BERNARD JOHNS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CA-01-58-AM) Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001 Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joshua Bernard Johns, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Joshua Bernard Johns seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Johns’ motion for a writ of habeas corpus, and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Johns v. Baskerville , No. CA-01-58-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 22, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83918]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24032]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
375 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-30, K2025-29.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24032 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Melissa Schessler as President and CEO, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB (Amendment #1)  of Meltdown Massage and Body Works, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 12, 2008 By: /s/ Melissa Schessler Melissa Schessler, President & CEO
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with this Quarterly Report of Affordable Green Homes International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael P Vahl, principal accounting officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his
knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Affordable Green Homes International, Inc.








AFFORDABLE GREEN HOMES INTERNATIONALDated: November 13, 2009
By:
/s/ Michael P VahlMichael P VahlPrincipal Accounting officer
#### Fossman, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondents.

*September 8*

October *3, 1950.*

*B. W. Van Dyke*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, and for the respondent Connor *541Lumber & Land Company by *Graves, Casey & Potter*of Wisconsin Rapids, and oral argument by *Stewart G. Honeck,*deputy attorney general, and *R. B. Graves.*

Gehl, J.

On April 2, 1937, plaintiff sustained an injury to his left eye while in the employment of defendant, Connor Lumber & Land Company. He testified that he was repairing a clutch on a tractor at the time, chiseling off some substance with a solder pick; that a piece of metal hit him in the eye. He was immediately sent to a hospital where a physician examined him. The last payment for temporary total disability was made on May 12, 1937. About two or three weeks later he was examined by another physician. In February, 1947, plaintiff noticed a loss of vision in his left eye and consulted a doctor. The examination disclosed a diagonal tear of the iris of the eye of traumatic origin. A recheck of the vision made on July 15, 1947, disclosed that there was an increased impairment of vision.

Defendants contend that plaintiff’s claim for compensation is barred by the provisions of secs. 102.01 (2) and 102.17 (4), Stats. 1935. Sec. 102.01 (2) provides as follows:

> “. . . ‘Time of injury,’ ‘occurrence of injury,’ ‘date of injury’ is the date of the accident which caused the injury or in the case of disease, the last day of work for the last employer whose employment caused disability.”

Sec. 102.17 (4), Stats. 1935, provides:

> “The right of an employee, his legal representative, or dependent to proceed under this section shall not extend beyond six years from the.date of the injury or death or from the date that compensation (other than medical treatment or burial expenses) was last paid, whichever date is latest.”

Plaintiff contends, however, that a fraud was committed upon him by the physicians who examined and treated him immediately and shortly after his injury, that he did not discover the facts constituting such fraud until 1947, and that *542therefore there is applicable sec. 330.19 (7), Stats., which permits commencement within six years of,- — •

> “An action for relief on the grounds of fraud. The cause of action in such case is not deemed to have accrued until the discovery, by the aggrieved party, of the facts constituting the fraud.”

This section is one of the general provisions relating to limitation of actions and does not apply to proceedings under the compensation act. *Acme Body Works v. Industrial Comm.*204 Wis. 493, 234 N. W. 756, 236 N. W. 378.

Plaintiff’s claim is barred by the provisions of the Compensation Act, secs. 102.01 (2) and 102.17 (4), Stats.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James DiLorenzo, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  annual  report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Cedric  Kushner
Promotions, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining  disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

a) designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the small  business  issuer ,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  small  business  issuer's  disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business  issuer's  internal
control  over  financial  reporting  that  occurred  during  the small  business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business  issuer's  fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual  report) that has  materially  affected,  or is
likely to materially  affect,  the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based  on  our  most  recent  evaluation  of  internal  control  over  financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors:

a) all  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely to  adversely  affect  the small  business  issuer's  ability  to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant  role in the small  business  issuers  internal
control over financial reporting.


May 13, 2005

/s/ James DiLorenzo
----------------
Name: James DiLorenzo
Title: Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer
NUMBER 13-21-00047-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG 

 

CARLOS GONZALEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

 

On appeal from the 214th District Court 

of Nueces County, Texas.

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Carlos Gonzalez, attempts to appeal the trial court’s overruling of 

defendant’s objection to a polygraph examination. The trial court entered an order on 

January 19, 2021, overruling appellant’s objection to the polygraph examination-as a 

condition of probation.
2

On February 8, 2021, the clerk of this court notified appellant it appeared that the 

order from which the appeal was taken was not a final, appealable order, and requested 

the defect be cured within thirty days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant failed 

to respond to the Court’s notice.

Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a 

criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. 

State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 

160, 161 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include: (1) 

certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State, 942 

S.W.2d 624, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce 

bond, Tex. R. App. P. 31.1; McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals from 

the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.--

Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown, 915 S.W.2d at 161.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal, is of the 

opinion that there is not an appealable order and this Court lacks jurisdiction over the 

matters herein. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b).

Delivered and filed on the

27th day of May, 2021.
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Thomas H. Waechter, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amended
Quarterly Report of Spectrian Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in such Amended Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Spectrian Corporation.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/THOMAS H. WAECHTER                          
| |  | ------ |  | -----------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Thomas H. Waechter                             
| |  | Title: |  | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

I,
Michael D. Angel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amended Quarterly Report of Spectrian
Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Amended Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Spectrian Corporation.

| |  | By:    |  | /s/MICHAEL D. ANGEL                                                                        
| |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Name:  |  | Michael D. Angel                                                                           
| |  | Title: |  | Executive Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary

---

QuickLinks
#### Saunders, Appellant, vs. Johnson, City Clerk, Respondent.

*April 12*

May *18, 1943.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *John Garvin*of Ashland, and for the respondent on the brief of *W. H. Cate,*city attorney.

Fairchild, J.

No authority has been cited and we are unable to discover any allowing the city clerk to withhold the pension mon'ey on his own initiative, even though he is thus *97attempting to pay a debt of the pensioner. Until he is presented with a judgment constituting a valid claim under sec. 304.21, Stats., he has no alternative but to pay the money due to the appellant. It was, therefore, error to quash the alternative writ of *mandamus.*

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanstar, Inc. (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Joseph Loggia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



|By: | /s/JOSEPH LOGGIAJoseph Loggia Chief Executive Officer | 
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------- | 

---

QuickLinks
1 

### Hunt, Jeff

From: Hall, Chris

Sent: Friday, June 14, 2013 9:39 AM

To: Hunt, Jeff

Cc: Rose, Keith

Subject: Tacoma 'L' St 2010-12 PM2.5 DV

Attachments: PM2.5_DesignValues_20102012_DRAFT_05_20_13.xlsx

Hi Jeff,

I have confirmed that the 2010

‐ 12 24

‐ hr Design Value for the Tacoma ‘L’ Street site is in fact 28ug/m3. This, as it turns

out, is the same value that the AQDA group at OAQPS (Neil Frank’s group) has determined. If you look at Table 5 in

Neil‘s spreadsheet (attached), row 978, column W, you will see the correct value. This can also be determined by

averaging the 3 p98 values provided in columns DQ thru DS (also row 978). My take is that the 27 value provided in

Table 1b, row 33 is simply a transcription error.

Hope this help,

Chris
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24011]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 426 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-10, K2025-10.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24011 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P