alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1  Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   I, Mark Cohen, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AI Document Services, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and  c) presented in this quarterly report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls  6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.  Date: January 5, 2009   /s/ Mark Cohen Mark Cohen Title: President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**Certification of Principal Financial Officer Requiredby Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934**

 

I, David W. Montgomery, certify that:

 

(1)           Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Advanstar, Inc. (the“registrant”);

 

(2)           Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

(3)           Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

(4)           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, orcaused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

 

(b)  **[Reserved]**

 

(c)  Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(d)Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;

 

(5)           Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknessesin the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: March 30, 2006 | By:    | /s/ David W. Montgomery |
|----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                 |   | David W. Montgomery     |
|                 |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 99.1

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Distribution Management Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leo
Greenfield, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
issuer.



August 26, 2002                             /s/ Leo Greenfield
                                            ---------------------
                                            Leo Greenfield
                                            Chief Executive Officer
#### Hale, Respondent, vs. Hale and another, Appellants.

*March 5*

April *9, 1957.*

*370For the appellants there was a brief by *Gif fin & Simar ski*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Edward J. Simarski.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Lowry & Hunter,*attorneys, and *Willis J. Zick*of counsel, all of Waukesha, and oral argument by *Mr. Zick.*

Currie, J.

The issue on this appeal is how the two-year period is to be computed which is prescribed by sec. 330.19 (5), Stats., for either giving written notice of injury or serving the complaint, where the cause of action is one to recover for personal injuries. If the day on which the accident occurred is to be excluded, but the day on which the complaint was served is to be counted, then the service of the complaint in the instant case was timely.

The provisions of sec. 990.001 (4) (a) and (d), Stats. 1955, control and are decisive of this appeal. These two paragraphs provide as follows:

> “(a) The time within which an act is to be done or proceeding had or taken shall be computed by excluding the first day and including the last; and when any such time is expressed in hours the whole of Sunday and of any legal holiday, from midnight to midnight, shall be excluded.

> “(d) Regardless of whether the time limited in any statute for the taking of any proceeding or the doing of an act is measured from an event or from the date or day on which such event occurs, the day on which such event took place shall be excluded in the computation of such time.”

*371The defendants contend that our decision in *Siebert v. Jacob Dudenhoefer Co.*(1922), 178 Wis. 191, 188 N. W. 610, requires that we reverse the trial court. However, that case was decided prior to the adoption by the legislature of any statute for computing time expressed in years. Therefore, in that case the common-law rule was applied under which the day of the event is counted and not excluded. On this point, see *Pick Industries v. Gebhard-Berghammer*(1953), 264 Wis. 353, 356, 59 N. W. (2d) 798, 60 N. W. (2d) 254. Because of the enactment of the statutes quoted above, *Siebert v. Jacob Dudenhoefer Co., supra,*is no longer of any value as a precedent on the issue of how to compute the two-year period prescribed by sec. 330.19 (5), Stats.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 356 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.356

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
  To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain works, 
facilities, and titles of the Gila Project, and designated lands within 
 or adjacent to the Gila Project, to the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and 
               Drainage District, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be referred to as the ``Wellton-Mohawk Transfer Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSFER.

    The Secretary of the Interior (``Secretary'') is authorized to 
carry out the terms of the Memorandum of Agreement No. 8-AA-34-WAO14 
(``Agreement'') dated July 10, 1998 between the Secretary and the 
Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District (``District'') 
providing for the transfer of works, facilities, and lands to the 
District, including conveyance of Acquired Lands, Public Lands, and 
Withdrawn Lands, as defined in the Agreement.

SEC. 3. WATER AND POWER CONTRACTS.

    Notwithstanding the transfer, the Secretary and the Secretary of 
Energy shall provide for and deliver Colorado River water and Parker-
Davis Project Priority Use Power to the District in accordance with the 
terms of existing contracts with the District, including any amendments 
or supplements thereto or extensions thereof and as provided under 
section 2 of the Agreement.

SEC. 4. SAVINGS.

    Nothing in this Act shall affect any obligations under the Colorado 
River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public Law 93-320, 43 U.S.C. 1571).

SEC. 5. REPORT.

    If transfer of works, facilities, and lands pursuant to the 
Agreement has not occurred by July 1, 2000, the Secretary shall report 
on the status of the transfer as provided in section 5 of the 
Agreement.

SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be 
necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Democratic Republic of the Congo

                    On October 27, 2006, by Executive Order 13413, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo, which has been marked by widespread violence and atrocities that continue to threaten regional stability. The President took additional steps to address this national emergency in Executive Order 13671 of July 8, 2014.                

The situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13413 of October 27, 2006, as amended by Executive Order 13671 of July 8, 2014, must continue in effect beyond October 27, 2024. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to the situation in or in relation to the Democratic Republic of the Congo declared in Executive Order 13413, as amended by Executive Order 13671.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2024-23966

Billing code 3395-F4-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 322 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 322

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add the Martin Luther King Jr. 
  holiday to the list of days on which the flag should especially be 
                               displayed.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1999

 Mr. Campbell (for himself and Mr. Brownback) introduced the following 
    bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the 
                               Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to add the Martin Luther King Jr. 
  holiday to the list of days on which the flag should especially be 
                               displayed.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY TO LIST OF DAYS.

    Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday, third Monday in 
January;'' after ``January 20;''.
                                 <all>
```
#### Wagner, Appellant, vs. Home Mutual Casualty Company, Respondent.

*December 2, 1952*—

January *6, 1953.*

*675
      *Frank L. Morrow*of Eau Claire, for the appellant.

*Donald L. Farr*of Eau Claire, for the respondent.

MaRtin, J.

The only question on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting defendant’s motion for a directed verdict.

There is no evidence of excessive speed on the part of either driver.

Considering the evidence most favorable to the plaintiff, Kuhn testified that he did not see the Wagner car until the moment the vehicles collided. Wagner stated that he saw the Kuhn car when he was about seventy-five feet west of the intersection and the Kuhn car was approximately eighty feet south of it. He thought the other driver would slow down or stop and that he would have time enough to get across; so he paid no more attention to it until the collision was imminent. There is nothing in the evidence, however, to show that the Kuhn car gave any indication of slowing or stopping; plaintiff testified he judged Kuhn’s speed as greater than his own at the time he made his only observation.

Furthermore, defendant’s insured had the right of way, sec. 85.18 (1), Stats., and if anyone would have had reason to believe that the other would yield, it was Kuhn. In the exercise of ordinary care, plaintiff, having observed the Kuhn car approaching the intersection, should have had his car under such control as to be able to yield the right of way; he was negligent in relying on any assumption that the other driver would stop and allow him to pass.

In our opinion the trial court could reach no other conclusion than that both drivers were guilty of negligent lookout as a matter of law. The negligence of each was of the same *676kind and character, and a verdict finding anything other than that plaintiff’s negligence was at least as great as Kuhn’s in respect to lookout would have been based on speculation. The trial court properly granted the motion for direction of the verdict in defendant’s favor.

*By the Court*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Chong Kim as President and CEO, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Marvins Place, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 20, 2008 By: /s/ Chong Kim Chong Kim, President & CEO
October 2, 2015

Mr. Bryton J. Tomcek

412 Harvest Hill Drive

Denmark, WI 54208

Dear Mr. Tomcek:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2818 on July 9, 2015, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

 

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2009 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Harrington West Financial Group, Inc./s/ Craig J. CernyCraig J. CernyChief Executive Officer/s/ William W. Phillips, jr.William W. Phillips, Jr.President, Chief Operating Officer/s/ Kerril SteeleKerril SteeleChief Financial Officer A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 139