alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO




18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,




AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO




SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Retalix Ltd. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of such officer’s knowledge:




(1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: June 15, 2010

By: /s/ Shuky Sheffer

——————————————

Shuky Sheffer

Chief Executive Officer





Date: June 15, 2010

By: /s/ Hugo Goldman

——————————————

Hugo Goldman

Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3060 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3060

 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the 
 applicability of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong 
                               veterans.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 15, 2000

 Mr. Wellstone introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization Act of 2000 to extend the 
 applicability of that Act to certain former spouses of deceased Hmong 
                               veterans.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF HMONG VETERANS' NATURALIZATION ACT TO CERTAIN 
              FORMER SPOUSES OF DECEASED HMONG VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Section 2 of the Hmong Veterans' Naturalization 
Act of 2000 (Public Law 106-207; 114 Stat. 316; 8 U.S.C. 1423 note) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (2), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) who--
                    ``(A) satisfies the requirement of paragraph 
                (1)(A); and
                    ``(B) is the surviving spouse of a person described 
                in paragraph (1)(B) which described person was killed 
                or died in Laos, Thailand, or Vietnam.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3 of that Act is amended by 
striking ``or (2)'' and inserting ``, (2), or (3)''.
    (c) Deadline for Application.--Section 6 of that Act is amended by 
adding at the end the following new sentence: ``In the case of a person 
described in section 2(3), the application referred to in the preceding 
sentence, and appropriate fees, shall be filed not later than 18 months 
after the date of the enactment of this sentence.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0015

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

ELIZABETH MARGARET HOSCHOUER,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including August 23, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 17 2023

07/17/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0015
**CERTIFICATION**

**PURSUANT        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.   | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30,                2008,                fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of                the                Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2.   | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the                quarter ending September 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: October                27, 2008 | By:   | /s/   | Vanleo                Y.W. Fung            |
|--------------------------------------------|-----------------|-----------------|--------------------------------------------|
|                                       |            |            | Vanleo                Y.W. Fung            |
|                                       |            |            | Chief                Executive Officer and |
|                                       |            |            | Principal                Financial Officer |

----
/ J. 

Hardesty 

PC0.4.0$1 

Parraguirre 

timeframe for the offenses, the district court impermissibly modified the 

murder charge, and the judgment of conviction did not contain statutory 

subsections for the offenses. To the extent that appellant claimed that his 

sentence should be modified, he failed to demonstrate that the district 

court relied on mistaken assumptions regarding his criminal record that 

worked to his extreme detriment. See Edwards v. State, 112 Nev. 704, 

708, 918 P.2d 321, 324 (1996). Appellant also failed to demonstrate that 

his sentence was facially illegal or that the district court lacked 

jurisdiction. See id. Appellant's claims regarding the validity of his 

judgment of conviction fell outside the narrow scope of claims permissible 

in a motion to modify or correct a sentence. See id. We therefore conclude 

that the district court did not err in denying appellant's motions. 

Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 

2We have reviewed all documents that appellant has submitted in 

proper person to the clerk of this court in this matter, and we conclude 

that no relief based upon those submissions is warranted. To the extent 

that appellant has attempted to present claims or facts in those 

submissions which were not previously presented in the proceedings 

below, we have declined to consider them in the first instance. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 

mrf-wir,t 5e,...vA - 
cc: Hon. Jerome Polaha, District Judge 

Steven Floyd Voss 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 23

- 00048

- CV

Millennium Interests, Ltd. and Sunbelt Estates, L.L.C. , Appellant s

v.

Maurilio Serrato Hernandez , Appellee

FROM THE 423RD DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 423

- 8902 , THE HON O R ABLE CHRISTOPHER DARROW DUGGAN , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant s ’ brief was originally due on February 27, 2023

. On April 10, 2023

,

this C ourt sent a notice to appellant s informing them that th ei r brief was overdue and that

a failure to file a satisfactory response by April 20, 2023

, would result in the dismissal of

this appeal for want of p rosecution. To date, appellant s ha ve not filed a brief or a motion for

extension of time. Accordingly, w e di sm iss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R.

App. P. 42.3(b).2 __________________________________________ J. Woodfin J ones , Justice

Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Jones *

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: May 10 , 2023

* B e fore J. Woo dfin Jones, Chief Justice (Re tir e d), T hird Court of Appeals, si tting b y assignment

. See Tex. Gov ’ t C ode § 74.003( b).
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83930]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24041]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
385 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-51, K2025-50.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24041 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2877

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct feasibility studies on water optimization in the Burnt River

basin, Malheur River basin, Owyhee River basin, and

Powder River basin, Oregon.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Burnt, Malheur,

5 Owyhee, and Powder River Basin Water Optimization

6 Feasibility Study Act of 2000’’.
2

S 2877 ES

1 SEC. 2. STUDY.

2 The Secretary of the Interior may conduct feasibility

3 studies on water optimization in the Burnt River basin,

4 Malheur River basin, Owyhee River basin, and Powder

5 River basin, Oregon.

6 SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

7 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

8 as are necessary to carry out this Act.

Passed the Senate October 13 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2877

AN ACT

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct feasibility studies on water optimization in

the Burnt River basin, Malheur River basin,Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin,Oregon.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certificationof Principal Executive OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of the Exchange Act**

        Inconnection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanstar, Inc. (the “Company”)for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph Loggia, Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adoptedpursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
| By:         |   | /s/ Joseph  Loggia      |   |
|-------------|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|        |   | Joseph Loggia           |
|        |   | Chief Executive Officer |
|        |   |                    |
|  Date: |   | April 2, 2007           |

 

 

----
Exhibit 99.2

                    CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Distribution Management Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended May 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leo
Greenfield, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that to the best of my knowledge

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
issuer.



August 26, 2002                             /s/ Leo Greenfield
                                            -------------------
                                            Leo Greenfield
                                            Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 11.1

<TABLE>
SPECTRIAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY
COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
(In thousands except per share data)

<CAPTION>

                                                    Three months ended                   Six months ended
                                               September 30,    September 28,     September 30,  September 28,
                                               -------------   --------------    --------------  -------------
                                                 1995             1996                1995          1996
                                               -------------   ------------      ------------    ------------

<S>                                                <C>             <C>             <C>           <C>      
Net income (loss)                                  $  2,453        $  (336)        $  4,717      $ (5,650)
                                               =============   ============      ============    ============

Weighted average number of shares 
outstanding used in computation:
   Common Stock                                       7,687           8,147           7,528          8,093
   Common Stock equivalents
     as a result of stock options
     outstanding                                        706           n/a *             807          n/a *

                                               -------------   ------------      ------------    ------------
       Shares used in computing per
         share amounts **                             8,393           8,147           8,335         8,093
                                               =============   ============      ============    ============


Net income (loss) per share                          $ 0.29        $ (0.04)          $ 0.57       $ (0.70)
                                               =============   ============      ============    ============


<FN>
*    Due to the  loss  in  this  period,  stock  options  outstanding  would  be
     antidilutive and are therefore not included in the calculation.

**    The  dilutive  impact  of  options  determined  using  the  fully  diluted
      calculation  is  not  materially   different  from  the  dilutive   impact
      represented in this statement determined using the primary method.
</FN>
</TABLE>

                                       17
#### The State v. Stegner et al.

1. Criminal Practice: continuance: sickness of counsel: discretion of trial court. A motion for the continuance of a criminal cause based on the alleged sickness of defendant’s counsel is addressed largely to the discretion of the trial court, and its order overruling the motion will not be interfered with where it appears that the defendant had ample time to procure other counsel and prepare for trial.

*Appeal from Galhoun JDistriet Court.*

Wednesday, June 15.

Defendants were indicted and -convicted of maintaining *14a nuisance by keeping a place for tbe unlawful sale of intoxicating liquors. Both unite in- the appeal to this court.

*N. B.*Hyatt, for appellants.

*A. J. Baker,*Attorney-general, for the State.

Beck, J.

The only ruling complained of by defendants’ counsel is the overruling of a motion to continue the cause, which was based upon the absence of defendants’ attorney occasioned by sickness. A like motion at a prior term, based upon the same ground, had been sustained. The indictment had been found about fifteen months before the trial. It appears that defendants had ample time to prepare for trial, and to secure another attorney to take the place of their counsel when he became incapable through sickness to attend to the case. At all events, the motion was addressed in a large measure to the discretion of the court. There is nothing to indicate that such discretion was abused. The judge, being acquainted with all the facts transpiring in connection with the case, was better able than we are to determine whether defendants had with due diligence and in good faith made efforts to prepare for trial, or whether the motion was but an expedient to obtain delay. We are required to exercise all presumption iu support of the court’s rulings, and they cannot be disturbed, unless error be affirmatively shown, which has not been done.

The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
# L_2012219EN.01002101.xml

| 17.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 219/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 219/21

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION 2012/478/CFSP

of 16 August 2012

implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union,

Having regard to Decision 2011/782/CFSP (1), and in particular Article 21(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 1 December 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/782/CFSP. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 1 December 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/782/CFSP.

| (2) | An additional entity should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/782/CFSP, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An additional entity should be included in the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/782/CFSP,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The entity listed in the Annex to this Decision shall be added to the list set out in Annex I to Decision 2011/782/CFSP.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 16 August 2012.

For the Council

The President

A. D. MAVROYIANNIS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 319, 2.12.2011, p. 56.

1

---

ANNEX

ENTITY REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 1

Entity

| | Name | Identifying information | Reasons | Date of listing |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1. | Drex Technologies Holding S.A. | Registered in Luxembourg under number B77616, formerly established at the following address: 17, rue Beaumont L-1219 Luxembourg. | The beneficial owner of Drex Technologies Holding S.A. is Rami Makhlouf, who is listed under EU sanctions for providing financial support to the Syrian regime. | 16.8.2012 |

Name

Identifying information

Reasons

Date of listing

1.

Drex Technologies Holding S.A.

Registered in Luxembourg under number B77616, formerly established at the following address: 17, rue Beaumont L-1219 Luxembourg.

The beneficial owner of Drex Technologies Holding S.A. is Rami Makhlouf, who is listed under EU sanctions for providing financial support to the Syrian regime.

16.8.2012

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2977 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.2977

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
 To assist in the establishment of an interpretive center and museum in 
the vicinity of the Diamond Valley Lake in southern California to ensure 
 the protection and interpretation of the paleontology discoveries made 
   at the lake and to develop a trail system for the lake for use by 
                 pedestrians and nonmotorized vehicles.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. INTERPRETIVE CENTER AND MUSEUM, DIAMOND VALLEY LAKE, HEMET, 
CALIFORNIA.
    (a) Assistance for Establishment of Center and Museum.--The 
Secretary of the Interior shall enter into an agreement with an 
appropriate entity for the purpose of sharing costs incurred to design, 
construct, furnish, and operate an interpretive center and museum, to 
be located on lands under the jurisdiction of the Metropolitan Water 
District of Southern California, intended to preserve, display, and 
interpret the paleontology discoveries made at and in the vicinity of 
the Diamond Valley Lake, near Hemet, California, and to promote other 
historical and cultural resources of the area.
    (b) Assistance for Nonmotorized Trails.--The Secretary shall enter 
into an agreement with the State of California, a political subdivision 
of the State, or a combination of State and local public agencies for 
the purpose of sharing costs incurred to design, construct, and 
maintain a system of trails around the perimeter of the Diamond Valley 
Lake for use by pedestrians and nonmotorized vehicles.
    (c) Matching Requirement.--The Secretary shall require the other 
parties to an agreement under this section to secure an amount of funds 
from non-Federal sources that is at least equal to the amount provided 
by the Secretary.
    (d) Time for Agreement.--The Secretary shall enter into the 
agreements required by this section not later than 180 days after the 
date on which funds are first made available to carry out this section.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated not more than $14,000,000 to carry out this section.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No . FAA - 2012 - 0774 Directorate ID : 2010 - SW - 057 - AD Helicopter Model: Eurocopter France Model AS350BA Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 85 Helicopters in the US Registry . Re ason : The actions of this AD are intended to prevent failure of the emergency container assembly due to age and subsequent damage to the helicopter and injury to the occupants after an emergency

water landing. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $21,775 for the left container assembly $26,690 for the right container assembly Labor per Helicopter ( 0.5 x $ 8 5 /work - hour for the replacement) $ 42.50 Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $ Total US Fleet Cost $ 485,075, assuming 10 helicopters require replacement of the right and left container assemblies Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory

Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Re gulatory

Flexibility

Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Gary

Roach