alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 28.2



                              [LETTERHEAD]
                         DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
                         ______________________________________________________
                         Deloitte & Touche LLP         Telephone: (501) 370-3600
                         Suite 1800                    Facsimile: (501) 374-4809
                         111 Center Street             Facsimile: (501) 375-7817
                         Little Rock, Arkansas 72201


INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT



To the Board of Directors of
Nuvell Financial Services Corp.
Little Rock, Arkansas:

We have examined management's assertion about Nuvell Financial Services Corp.'s
(the "Company's") compliance with its established minimum Servicing Standards
(herein "Servicing Standards") identified and included in the accompanying 
management assertion as of and for the year ended December 31, 1998, dated 
March 26, 1999. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with 
the Servicing Standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on 
management's assertion about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
Servicing Standards and performing such other prodcedures as we considered
necessary in circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal
determination of the Company's compliance with the Servicing Standards.

In our opinion management's assertion that the Company complied with the
aforementioned Servicing Standards as of and for the year ended December 31,
1998, is fairly stated, in all material respects.



March 26, 1999




                                       14
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/  John M. CurtisMay 10, 2010
    John M. CurtisPresident and Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Vangent and will be retained
by Vangent and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

Name of Subsidiary                                    Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization
-----------------                                     ---------------------------------------------
<S>                                                   <C>
Advanstar Communications Inc.                         New York

   Applied Business teleCommunications, Inc.          California

   Men's Apparel Guild in California, Inc.            California

   Art Expositions International, Inc.                Delaware

   Home Entertainment Events Partnership              Delaware

   Advanstar Wideband Partnership                     New York

   Advanstar Editora e Communicacoes Ltda.            Brazil

      Advanstar Communications (BVI) Ltd.             British Virgin Islands

   Advanstar Expositions Canada Limited               Canada, a Federal Canadian corporation

   SeCA                                               France, a French societe anonyme

   Advanstar Communications Asia Pacific              Hong Kong
      Partnership

   Advanstar Asia Limited                             Hong Kong

   Advanstar Communications (UK) Limited              United Kingdoms, under the laws of England
                                                      and Wales

      Telebusiness Exhibitions Limited (aka           United Kingdoms, under the laws of England
         Starform)                                    and Wales

   Advanstar Holdings GmbH                            Germany

      Advanstar Partner GmbH                          Germany

      Gruppe 21 Informationsdienste GmbH              Germany

Advanstar IH, Inc.                                    Delaware

   Advanstar.com, Inc.                                Delaware
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 13.2
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of R.V.B. Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, Ofer Naveh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
This Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.
The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: April 30, 2012
 
 /s/ Ofer NavehOfer Naveh

Chief Financial Officer
EXTENSION OF PROMISSORY NOTE
                         DATED ON OR ABOUT APRIL 1, 2000

     This  Extension of Promissory Note Dated On or About April 1, 2000, is made
as  of  the 23 day of August, 2001, by and between Kelvin John Claney, Robin Jan
Marney  and  William  Ainslie Reece, in their capacity as trustees of The Better
Blocks  Trust created by Deed dated 1 January 1994 ("Lender"), and International
Commercial  Television  Inc.  (formerly  known  as  Moran Dome Exploration Inc.)
("Borrower").

     WHEREAS,  Borrower executed a Promissory Note on or about April 1, 2000, in
the principal amount of $590,723.27 ("Promissory Note").  The Promissory Note is
due  two  years  from  the  date  of  execution;  and

     WHEREAS,  Borrower has requested an extension of the term of the Promissory
Note,  and  Lender  has agreed to that extension on the terms and conditions set
forth  in  this  Extension  of  Promissory Note Dated On or About April 1, 2000.

     NOW,  THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual agreements
contained  herein, the parties hereby agree that the term of the Promissory Note
shall  be  extended  to  November  1,  2002.

     EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY SET FORTH HEREIN, ALL OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE
PROMISSORY  NOTE DATED ON OR ABOUT APRIL 1, 2000, SHALL REMAIN IN FULL FORCE AND
EFFECT.

LENDER:                                 BORROWER:
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
Each undersigned in their capacity as   INTERNATIONAL  COMMERCIAL
a trustee of THE BETTER BLOCKS  TRUST   TELEVISION  INC.
created  by  Deed  1  January  1994

    /s/  Kelvin  Claney                      /s/  Thomas  Woolsey
-------------------------------------   -------------------------------------
Kelvin  Claney,  Trustee                Thomas  Woolsey,  President

    /s/  Roving  Jan  Marney
-------------------------------------
Robin  Jan  Marney,  Trustee

    /s/  William  Ainslie  Reece
-------------------------------------
William  Ainslie  Reece


<PAGE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from SEC Form
10-Q for quarter ending June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          12,431
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,607
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,371
<INVENTORY>                                      6,641
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,209
<PP&E>                                         517,633
<DEPRECIATION>                                  86,123
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 587,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           58,936
<BONDS>                                        320,173
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           124
<OTHER-SE>                                     148,898
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   587,748
<SALES>                                        125,706
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               125,706
<CGS>                                           88,584
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  109,802
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,575
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               6,968
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,361
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,165
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,196
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (299)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,897
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .32
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-10218 Summary Calendar

EDDIE MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CHARLES MARTIN; DON MAJURE; ROBERT G. ESTRADA; LEE ANN HALDANE; H. BEAVERS; MELINDA BOZARTH, Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:96-CV-292-X

--------------------- January 15, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Eddie Martin, Texas inmate #651314, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Martin also moves this court for appointment of counsel on appeal and for leave to supplement the record on appeal. Martin’s motions for appointment of counsel and for leave toNo. 97-10218 - 2 - supplement the record on appeal are DENIED. The district court did not err in dismissing Martin’s § 1983 claims pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey , 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994), and McGrew v. Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles , 47 F.3d 158, 161 (5th Cir. 1995), because Martin has not demonstrated that the revocation of his parole has been reversed, invalidated, or otherwise set aside. See Johnson v. McElveen , 101 F.3d 423, 424 (5th Cir. 1996). The district court properly dismissed Martin’s complaint pursuant to § 1915A(b)(1). Martin has not challenged the district court’s reasons for dismissing his claims against Attorney Estrada and thus, Martin has abandoned the issue. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (when appellant fails to identify error in the district court's analysis, it is as if the appellant had not appealed that judgment; this court will not raise and discuss legal issues that the appellant has failed to assert). Martin’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous.
See Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Martin is cautioned that any additional frivolous appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Martin should review any pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are frivolous.No. 97-10218 - 3 - APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTIONS DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3157 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3157

 To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish restrictions 
 regarding the qualifications of physicians to prescribe the abortion 
                     drug commonly known as RU-486.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 4 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

Mr. Hutchinson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish restrictions 
 regarding the qualifications of physicians to prescribe the abortion 
                     drug commonly known as RU-486.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``RU-486 Patient Health and Safety 
Protection Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS FOR PRESCRIBING ABORTION DRUG.

    With respect to the application that was submitted under section 
505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for the drug 
mifepristone (commonly referred to as RU-486, to be marketed as 
MIFEPREX), and that was approved on September 28, 2000, the Secretary 
of Health and Human Services, acting through the Commissioner of Food 
and Drugs, shall promptly modify the conditions of the approval of such 
drug to establish the additional restriction that the drug may not be 
prescribed by any person other than a licensed physician who meets the 
following requirements:
            (1) The physician is qualified to handle complications 
        resulting from an incomplete abortion or ectopic pregnancy.
            (2) The physician has been trained to perform surgical 
        abortions and has met all applicable legal requirements to 
        perform such abortions.
            (3) The physician is certified for ultrasound dating of 
        pregnancy and detecting ectopic pregnancy.
            (4) The physician has completed a program regarding the 
        prescribing of such drug that uses a curriculum approved by the 
        Secretary.
            (5) The physician has admitting privileges at a hospital to 
        which the physician can travel in one hour or less, determined 
        on the basis of starting at the principal medical office of the 
        physician and traveling to the hospital, using the 
        transportation means normally used by the physician to travel 
        to the hospital, and under the average conditions of travel for 
        the physician.
                                 <all>
```
#### Reburg, Respondent, vs. Lang, Appellant.

*December 4, 1941*

January *13, 1942.*

*382For the appellant there was a brief by *John H. Sweberg*and *Rex M. Smith,*both of Rhinelander, and oral argument by *Mr. Sweberg.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *Lehner & Lehner, Adolph P. Lehner,*and *Howard W. Eslíen,*all of Oconto> Falls.

Fairchild, J.

Appellant came to this country and worked on the farm of respondent. There was an indefinite assurance or promise that respondent would deed his farm to appellant. After appellant had worked for respondent for upwards of three years, differences having arisen between them, appellant began an action for the specific performance of what he alleged was a contract. Specific performance was denied by the judgment in that action granted in October, 1937. But it was decreed that appellant was to have the value of the serv*383ices performed together with interest and costs, and that the judgment was to be a specific lien on the premises. It is the lien of that judgment from which respondent seeks to relieve his homestead.

There is no bill of exceptions and the findings support the judgment entered below. *Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Madson,*202 Wis. 271, 276, 232 N. W. 525; *Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc., v. Sexauer,*204 Wis. 415, 235 N. W. 785; *Bobczyk v. Integrity Mutual Ins. Co., ante,*p. 196, 300 N. W. 909.

Appellant in the action which he brought against his employer recovered a judgment, but the record nowhere shows facts which give appellant the right to' a valid lien against the homestead. The granting of any such lien in the suit for specific performance was in excess of the court’s jurisdiction. The term “jurisdiction” includes not only jurisdiction over persons and subject matter but power to render a particular form of judgment as well. *Two Rivers Mfg. Co. v. Beyer,*74 Wis. 210, 42 N. W. 232; *Application of Clark,*135 Wis. 437, 115 N. W. 387. In attempting to make a judgment a specific lien on the premises so as to affect homestead rights, the court exceeded its jurisdiction and to that extent its judgment is void. 15 R. C. L. p. 841; 114 A. L. R. 263.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Annual Report of Mega
Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period
ending January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gennady
Pomeranets, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-K for the period ending January 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period
ending January 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group,
Inc.
  By:
                /s/Gennady
      PomeranetsGENNADY
      POMERANETSChief Financial
      Officer,Date:
                May
      18, 2009
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

      ( print page 83925)    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 459 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-61, K2025-59.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24066 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 381

To allow certain individuals who provided service to the Armed Forces of

the United States in the Philippines during World War II to receive

a reduced SSI benefit after moving back to the Philippines.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 4, 1999

Mr. INOUYE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To allow certain individuals who provided service to the

Armed Forces of the United States in the Philippines

during World War II to receive a reduced SSI benefit

after moving back to the Philippines.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•S 381 IS

1 SECTION 1. PROVISION OF REDUCED SSI BENEFIT TO CER2 TAIN INDIVIDUALS WHO PROVIDED SERVICE

3 TO THE ARMED FORCES OF THE UNITED

4 STATES IN THE PHILIPPINES DURING WORLD

5 WAR II AFTER THEY MOVE BACK TO THE

6 PHILIPPINES.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding sections

8 1611(b), 1611(f)(1), and 1614(a)(1)(B)(i) of the Social

9 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1382(b), (f)(1),

10 1382c(a)(1)(B)(i))—

11 (1) the eligibility of a qualified individual for

12 benefits under the supplemental security income pro13 gram under title XVI of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1381

14 et seq.) shall not terminate by reason of a change

15 in the place of residence of the individual to the

16 Philippines; and

17 (2) the benefits payable to the individual under

18 such program shall be reduced by 25 percent for so

19 long as the place of residence of the individual is in

20 the Philippines.

21 (b) QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL DEFINED.—In sub22 section (a), the term ‘‘qualified individual’’ means an indi23 vidual who—

24 (1) as of the date of enactment of this Act, is

25 receiving benefits under the supplemental security
3

•S 381 IS

1 income program under title XVI of the Social Secu2 rity Act (42 U.S.C. 1381 et seq.); and

3 (2) before December 31, 1946, served in the or4 ganized military forces of the Government of the

5 Commonwealth of the Philippines while such forces

6 were in the service of the Armed Forces of the

7 United States pursuant to the military order of the

8 President dated July 26, 1941, including among

9 such military forces organized guerrilla forces under

10 commanders appointed, designated, or subsequently

11 recognized by the Commander in Chief, Southwest

12 Pacific Area, or other competent military authority

13 in the Army of the United States.

Æ