alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 430 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-15, K2025-15.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24018 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### Hoffmann, Appellant, vs. Krause and others, Respondents.

*October 15*

November *20, 1945.*

*567For the appellant there was a brief by *Winter & Koehler*of Shawano, and oral argument by *P. J. Winter.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Eberlein & Eber-lein*of Shawano, and oral argument by *M. G. Eberlein.*

Fairchild, J.

A directed verdict in favor of defendants was a correct ruling in this case. As a matter of law, no proximate causal connection is shown between the negligence, if any, of the defendants in parking their cars as they .did, and the damage to the plaintiff’s automobile. The evidence most favorable to plaintiff reveals that the intervening acts of (plaintiff in failing to control his car were the sole cáuse of the accident. His testimony is that he saw the two parked vehicles when approximately three hundred feet away. He then applied his brakes and skidded off the highway. But *568he, at no time, came closer than two hundred fifty feet to the parked truck or automobile. There was no collision or contact between his car and the truck. While at the top of the hill he was given a warning signal of danger by a man standing near the disabled truck. This afforded plenty of space to stop a car driven at a reasonable rate of speed. It is true that the road was icy but that condition was known to plaintiff and placed upon him a duty to give consideration to that fact and proceed accordingly. It is a well-known physical fact that cars may skid on slippery roads if not properly handled. The skidding results in partial or complete loss of control. The circumstances present may or may not imply negligence, but the result may not be charged to another who gave timely warning and who, as to the question of cause, cannot be required in reasonable anticipation to foresee that another, coming over the hill on an Icy surface would drive so as to be unable to stop in three hundred feet. Had plaintiff been able to manage and control his car as he should under the circumstances, he would have been as likely to pass the parked truck in safety as the car preceding him.

The facts in this case are analogous to the situation in *Albrecht v. Waterloo Const. Co.*(1934) 218 Iowa, 1205, 257 N. W. 183, where a truck stopped on a highway was visible to approaching motorists from both directions for distances of over two hundred fifty feet and was perceived by plaintiff at over two hundred feet. Although the court indicated that there might not be negligence in the manner of parking, it held that in any event, since the truck was seen in plenty of time to stop, the parking was not a proximate cause of the accident. See also *Mounts v. Tzugares*(1935), 9 Cal. App. (2d) 327, 49 Pac. (2d) *883;Suter's Adm’r v. Kentucky Power & Light Co.*(1934) 256 Ky. 356, 76 S. W. (2d) 29; *Powers v. S. Sternberg & Co.*(1938) 213 N. C. 41, 195 S. E. 88; *Simon v. Dixie Greyhound Lines*(1937), 179 Miss. 568. 176 So. 160.

*569Under the circumstances, the parking of the defendants’ vehicles was too remote to be a cause of the plaintiff’s skidding upon which to predicate any liability on the part of the defendants.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EXHIBIT 6







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002







In connection with the annual report of Freegold Ventures Limited (the Company) on Form 20F for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steve Manz, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13a-14(a) and  15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of the operations of the Company.







Steve Manz



Steve Manz

Chief Executive Officer



1

---
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion *

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited

circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-31046

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MARIO K JOHNSON

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 3:07-CR-17-1

Before DAVIS, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mario K. Johnson appeals the 210-month sentence of imprisonment

imposed following his plea of guilty to one count of distribution of five grams or

more of cocaine base. Johnson argues that the district court erred by imposing

a career offender enhancement pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1. According to

Johnson, the sentences for the two prior Louisiana drug offenses which formed

the basis for the enhancement should not have been treated as separate

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

June 8, 2009

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk
No. 08-31046

2

sentences because they were functionally consolidated. As Johnson concedes,

because he did not object to the enhancement in the district court, review is for

plain error. United States v. Campos-Maldonado, 531 F.3d 337, 339-40 (5th

Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 328 (2008). 

Even if Johnson had objected to the enhancement, there was no error.

Under the plain language of the current version of § 4A1.2(a)(2), prior sentences

“are always counted separately if the sentences were imposed for offenses that

were separated by an intervening arrest (i.e., the defendant is arrested for the

first offense prior to committing the second offense.” If there was no intervening

arrest, the sentences are still treated separately unless (1) they resulted from

offenses charged in the same instrument, or (2) the sentences were imposed on

the same day. § 4A1.2(a)(2). It is undisputed that Johnson was arrested for the

first offense on January 26, 2006, and that the second offense occurred on

February 21, 2006. Thus, the offenses were separated by an intervening arrest,

and are treated separately. It is unnecessary to conduct any further analysis.

Although Johnson contends that a court must inquire into whether the

prior sentences were functionally consolidated, consolidation is no longer the

relevant inquiry under the version of § 4A1.2 that applies to him. Even under

the prior version, however, offenses separated by an intervening arrest were

treated separately, and courts looked to whether they were consolidated only if

there was no intervening arrest.

In light of the foregoing, the district court committed no error, plain or

otherwise. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2794

To provide for a temporary Federal district judgeship for the southern district

of Indiana.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 27, 2000

Mr. BAYH (for himself and Mr. LUGAR) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To provide for a temporary Federal district judgeship for

the southern district of Indiana.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY JUDGESHIP FOR THE SOUTHERN

4 DISTRICT OF INDIANA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President shall appoint, by

6 and with the advice and consent of the Senate, 1 addi7 tional district judge for the southern district of Indiana.

8 (b) FIRST VACANCY NOT FILLED.—The first va9 cancy in the office of district judge in the southern district

10 of Indiana, occurring 7 years or more after the confirma-
2

•S 2794 IS

1 tion date of the judge named to fill the temporary judge2 ship created under subsection (a), shall not be filled.

3 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There

4 are authorized to be appropriated such sums as may be

5 necessary to carry out the provisions of this Act, including

6 such sums as may be necessary to provide appropriate

7 space and facilities for the judicial position created by this

8 Act.

Æ
II

Calendar No. 48

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 356

[Report No. 106–21]

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain works, facilities,

and titles of the Gila Project, and designated lands within or adjacent

to the Gila Project, to the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage

District, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. KYL (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain

works, facilities, and titles of the Gila Project, and designated lands within or adjacent to the Gila Project,

to the Wellton-Mohawk Irrigation and Drainage District,

and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 356 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be referred to as the ‘‘Wellton-Mohawk

3 Transfer Act’’.

4 SEC. 2. TRANSFER.

5 The Secretary of the Interior (‘‘Secretary’’) is author6 ized to carry out the terms of the Memorandum of Agree7 ment No. 8–AA–34–WAO14 (‘‘Agreement’’) dated July

8 10, 1998 between the Secretary and the Wellton-Mohawk

9 Irrigation and Drainage District (‘‘District’’) providing

10 for the transfer of works, facilities, and lands to the Dis11 trict, including conveyance of Acquired Lands, Public

12 Lands, and Withdrawn Lands, as defined in the Agree13 ment.

14 SEC. 3. WATER AND POWER CONTRACTS.

15 Notwithstanding the transfer, the Secretary and the

16 Secretary of Energy shall provide for and deliver Colorado

17 River water and Parker-Davis Project Priority Use Power

18 to the District in accordance with the terms of existing

19 contracts with the District, including any amendments or

20 supplements thereto or extensions thereof and as provided

21 under section 2 of the Agreement.

22 SEC. 4. SAVINGS.

23 Nothing in this Act shall affect any obligations under

24 the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act (Public

25 Law 93–320, 43 U.S.C. 1571).
3

S 356 RS

1 SEC. 5. REPORT.

2 If transfer of works, facilities, and lands pursuant to

3 the Agreement has not occurred by July 1, 2000, the Sec4 retary shall report on the status of the transfer as pro5 vided in section 5 of the Agreement.

6 SEC. 6. AUTHORIZATION.

7 There are authorized to be appropriated such sums

8 as may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this

9 Act.
Calendar No. 48

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 356

[Report No. 106–21]

A BILL

To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to convey

poses.gation and Drainage District, and for other purto the Gila Project, to the Wellton-Mohawk IrriProject, and designated lands within or adjacentcertain works, facilities, and titles of the Gila

MARCH 17, 1999

Reported without amendment
Exhibit 35.12












Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 WALL ST
NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836







RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM
2012-CCRE2 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates



Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August
1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator
("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):



(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting
Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and



(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such
review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.







March 1, 2016





BRIAN SMITH

Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-11035

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JUSTIN RAY MONROE,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:18-CR-6-8

Before HAYNES, DUNCAN, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Justin Ray Monroe has moved for 

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 

386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Monroe has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow

us to make a fair evaluation of Monroe’s claims of ineffective assistance or 

coercion by counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 8, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 19-11035 Document: 00515409353 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/08/2020
No. 19-11035

2

prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 

(5th Cir. 2014); United States v. Corbett, 742 F.2d 173, 176-78 (5th Cir. 1984).

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Monroe’s response. We concur with counsel’s 

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See

5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 19-11035 Document: 00515409353 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/08/2020
Order entered November 5, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00702-CV

H. ROBERT ROSE, ET AL., Appellants

V.

NICHOLAS BONVINO, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-2450-06

ORDER

We GRANT appellees’ November 3, 2014 agreed second motion for an extension of 

time to file a brief. Appellees shall file their brief by November 7, 2014.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S WR-87,432-01

EX P ARTE JASON LUMLEY, App licant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. D35606-CR IN THE 13T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM NAVARRO COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Tex as C o d e o f Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of four offe nses in
a multi-count indictment: Count 1 for evading arr est; Count 2 for acc ident involving injury ; Count 3 for acc ident involving injury ; and Count 4 for unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. Applicant was assessed punishment at 40 y ear s’ conf inement in Count 1; at 50 y ear s confineme nt’ in Count 2; at 50 y ear s’ conf

i n em ent in Count 3; and at 455 day s in a State J ail fac ility in Count 4. The Tenth Court of Appea ls aff

irmed his conviction. Lumley v. State , No. 1 0 -15-00267- CR (Tex. App.—Waco2

Dec . 17, 2015)(not designated f or publication). This Court rec eived A

p p li c a nt’ s application on September 18, 2017 and denied relief without
a writ t en o rd er , based on the trial court’s finding s, on October 6, 2017. Subsequently , this Court
rec eived a let ter from Applicant, that the Finding s of Fa ct and Conclusions of L aw signe d by the habea s judge had been vacated. In the letter, the habea s judge stated that he had voluntarily rec used himself on April 22, 2015 and signed the F indings of F acts and Conclusions of L aw in er ror. The district cler

k has s upplemented the rec ord with the judge ’s cer tificate of rec usal and the notice
vacating the F indings of F act a nd Conclusions of L aw. There fore , we withdraw, sua sponte , our previous order of denial base d on the trial court’s Finding s of Fa cts and Conclusions of L aw. After a revie w of the rec ord, the Applicant’s claims are denied.

Filed: Nove mber 22, 2017 Do not publish
----

| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009  fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Affordable Green Homes International, Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   | AFFORDABLE GREEN HOMES INTERNATIONAL |                    |
|------------------------|--------------------------------------|-------------------------|
|                   |                                 |                    |   |
| Dated: August 14, 2009 | By:                                  | /s/ Michael P Vahl |   |
|                   |                                 | Michael P Vahl          |   |
|                   |                                 | Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                   |                                 |                    |   |

----
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Minerals Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Damian O'Hara, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
11th day of February, 2009.


/s/ Damian O'Hara
----------------------------------
Principal Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as an officer of Proteo, Inc. (the
"Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her
knowledge:





(1) the
Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009
(hereinafter referred to as the "Annual Report") fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the
information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Date:
March 26, 2010





/s/ Birge
Bargmann


Birge
Bargmann


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer










A SIGNED
ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO
PROTEO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY PROTEO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO THE
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.





THIS
CERTIFICATION IS BEING FURNISHED PURSUANT TO RULE 15(D) AND SHALL NOT BE DEEMED
"FILED" FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT (15 U.S.C. 78R), OR
OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF THAT SECTION. THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL NOT
BE DEEMED TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING UNDER THE SECURITIES
ACT OR THE EXCHANGE ACT, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE COMPANY SPECIFICALLY
INCORPORATES IT BY REFERENCE.
EXHIBIT 32.2



WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with Quarterly Report of Lihua International,
Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Daphne Yan Huang, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b)
or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: November 9, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Daphne Yan Huang   
|----------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                        | Name:  | Daphne Yan Huang       
|                        | Title: | Chief Financial Officer