alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, Ivy M. Jernigan, certify that:

 

# **1.**                                       Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form l0-Q of Movie Gallery, Inc.;

# ** **

# **2.**                                       Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

# ** **

# **3.**                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

# ** **

# **4.**                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

# ** **

(a)       designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 (b)      evaluated the effectivenessof the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

(c)       disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

# **5.**                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

# ** **

(a)       all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

## **(b)**      anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Date: May 14, 2004      |
|-------------------------|
|                    |
|                    |
| /s/ Ivy M. Jernigan     |   |
| Ivy M. Jernigan         |
| Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
*

 This opinion is being released initially in typescript form.

IN THE

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 06-2801

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

SHAABAN HAFIZ AHMAD ALI SHAABAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Indiana,

Indianapolis Division.

No. 05 CR 34--John Daniel Tinder, Judge.

 

APPELLANT COUNSEL’S MOTION TO

WITHDRAW AND TO ALLOW MR. SHAABAN

TO PROCEED PRO SE

APRIL 24, 2008*

 
No. 06-2801 Page 2

RIPPLE,CircuitJudge(in chambers). Counsel for Shaaban Hafiz

AhmadAliShaaban seeksleave towithdrawasappointedcounselforMr.

Shaaban and asks that I permit Mr. Shaaban to proceed pro se. On

January 28, 2008, I appointed new counsel for Mr. Shaaban after

concluding that the record raised substantial doubt that his previously

appointed counsel had fulfilled adequately his obligations under the

Seventh Circuit Criminal Justice Act Plan, § V.3. United States v.

Shaaban, 514 F.3d 697, 698-99 (7th Cir. 2008) (Ripple, J., in chambers). I

directed that new counsel file either a petition for rehearing or a motion

towithdraw on the ground that any such petition wouldbe frivolous. Id.

at 699. On February 7, 2008, the court appointed Chief Federal Defender

Richard H. Parsons in Peoria, Illinois, and Staff Attorney Andrew J.

McGowan of that office was assigned to the case. 

Attorney McGowan now represents that he has identified a nonfrivolous issue that could be raised in the petition for rehearing, but he

furthernotes that there are possible negative consequences toraising that

issue. Mr. Shaaban has informed Mr. McGowan that he does not want

this issue to be raised. Instead, Mr. Shaaban has prepared a pro se

petition forrehearing that raises the issues that Mr. Shaaban wantstobe

raised. He attempted to file his pro se petition with the court, but the

Clerk properly rejected the pro se petition because Mr. Shaaban was

represented by counsel. As a result of the disagreement regarding how

to proceed, counsel believes that there has been a breakdown in the

attorney-client relationship and moves to withdraw. 

Counsel was directed to file either a petition for rehearing or a

motion towithdrawbecause such a petition wouldbe frivolous. Shaaban,

514 F.3d at 699. Attorney McGowan explains that he cannot represent
No. 06-2801 Page 3

that a petition for rehearing would be frivolous because the issue he has

identifiedcouldhave possible beneficialconsequences, aswell aspossible

negative consequences. Mr. Shaaban, however, does not wantthis issue

tobe raised. I must conclude that counsel has attempted to comply with

the court’s directive, but that Mr. Shaaban would prefer to file a pro se

petition for rehearing raising the issues that he believes shouldbe raised.

Accordingly, I grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and permit Mr.

Shaaban to file a pro se petition for rehearing within 30 days. 

IT IS SO ORDERED
# SkyNet	Aerial	Media’s **UAV	COMPONENTS	LIST 1	of	2**  **Air	Frame** DJI	Phantom	3	Professional http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Flight	Control	System DJI, Phantom 3 - intergraded control http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## RC	Controllers **Flight Deck** **-** Provided	2.4 – 2.483GHZ	controller http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Transmitters DJI	integrated		“Light	Bridge”	2.4	GHZ http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Motors DJI	proprietary	propulsion	intergraded	motors http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Electronic	Speed	Controllers DJI	proprietary intergraded	ESC’s http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Power	Distribution Proprietary	15.2vdc	battery	pack http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Props DJI	9 Inch	Plastic	Propellers http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Batteries Proprietary	15.2vdc	battery	pack http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec 

## Gimbal DJI	Phantom	3	Intergraded	12MP	Camera/gimbal http://www.dji.com/product/phantom - 3/spec

# Additional	UAV **SkyNet	Aerial	Media’s UAV	COMPONENTS	LIST**  **2	of	2 Air	Frame**  Vulcan	Multiframe	“	Black	Widow”	950mm http://www.vulcanuav.com/airframes/black - widow/ 

## Flight	Control	System

### DJI,	Wookong	M	w/	GPS

http://www.dji.com/product/wookong - m 

## RC	Controllers **Flight	Deck -**  Jeti	DS	16	2.4	GHZ http://www.jetimodel.com/en/katalog/Transmitters/@produkt/DS - 16/ 

## Transmitters DJI		“Light	Bridge”	2.4	GHZ http://www.dji.com/product/dji - lightbridge/spec 

## Motors KDE DIRECT	4014 - 400KV	Brushless	DC	motor http://www.kdedirect.com/collections/xf - multi - rotor - brushless - motors/products/kde4014xf - 380 

## Electronic	Speed	Controllers KDE	DIRECT	UAS	35AMP http://www.kdedirect.com/collections/xf - multi - rotor - electronics/products/kdexf - uas35 

## Power	Distribution Vulcan	250	amp	Power	board http://www.vulcanuav.com/accessories/ 

## Props RC	Tiger	Motor	15.5	Carbon	Fiber http://www.rctigermotor.com/html/2013/prop_0805/16.html 

## Batteries 2	Six	cell	1600MAh	Tattu http://www.gensace.de/tattu - 16000mah - 22 - 2v- 15 - 30c - 6s1p - lipo - battery- pack.html 

## Gimbal DJI Zenmuse	Z

- 15 http://www.dji.com/product/zenmuse - z15
Fife Symington, Governor Edward Z. Fox, Director 

June 14, 1993 

Mr. John Wise 

Acting Regional Administrator 

U.S. Environmental protection Agency 

Region IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, California 94105 

RE: SUBMITTAL OF STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISIONS 

Dear Mr. Wise: 

Consistent with the provisions of A.R.S. 8 49-404 and 849-406 

(Exhibit 1) , 40 CFR 51.40 and 40 CFR 51.103, the Arizona Department 

of Environmental Quality (ADEQ) hereby adopts and submits to the 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as a revision to the State 

Implementation Plan (SIP), five copies each of the Final Nogales 

PM Nonattainment Area Plan (one unbound copy is being sent now 

wiph four additional bound copies to be sent June 18. 

The Nogales PMIO SIP revision meets the requirements of Section 

179 (B) of the Clean Air Act and demonstrates that it would attain 

the PMIO National Ambient Air ~uality Standards for PMIO by December 

31, 1994, if not for emissions generated in Mexico and affecting 

measured ambient PMl, levels in Nogales, Arizona. The completeness 

checklist for this SIP revision is contained in Exhibit 2. 

3033 North Central Avenue, Phoenix, Arizona 85012, (602)207-2300 

- --.-.. - -------.*---a- - - .-- -- 
Mr. Daniel McGovern 

June 14, 1993 

Page 2 

If you require additional information, please contact Ms. 

Nancy Wrona, Assistant Director for Air Quality, at (602) 207-2308, 

or Mr. Ira Domsky, Manager of our Air Quality Planning Section at 

(602) 207-2365. 

Thank you for your consideration in this important matter. 

Edward Z. Fox! 

Director 

Enclosures 

c: Nancy Wrona 

Chairman Camilio Ahumada, Santa Cruz Board of Supervisors 

Hugh A. Holub, Atty. City of Nogales 

Barbara Bates, EPA
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 83761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24313]



                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 202 / Friday, October 18, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 83761]]

                Memorandum of September 25, 2024

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) 
                and Section 614(a)(1) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 
                1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State:

                    (1) the authority under section 506(a)(1) of the 
                FAA to direct the drawdown of up to $375 million in 
                defense articles and services of the Department of 
                Defense, and military education and training, to 
                provide assistance to Ukraine and to make the 
                determinations required under such section to direct 
                such a drawdown; and
                    (2) the authority under section 614(a)(1) of the 
                FAA to determine whether it is important to the 
                security interests of the United States to furnish up 
                to $103 million in assistance to Ukraine without regard 
                to any provision of law within the purview of section 
                614(a)(1) of the FAA.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 25, 2024

[FR Doc. 2024-24313
Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
```
Exhibit 31.1  Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  I, Janet L. Crance, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 15, 2008 /s/ Janet L Crance Janet L Crance Chief Administrative Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 4.7

                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                ----------------

                                       OF
                                       --

                   WPIX INC. HOURLY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN
                   -------------------------------------------
                         (Effective as of July 1, 1991)



                  WHEREAS, WPIX Inc. (the "Company") maintains WPIX Inc. Hourly
Employees' Retirement Plan (the "Plan"); and

                  WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended from time to time and
further amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable;

                  NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the power
reserved to the Company by Section 10.1 of the Plan, the Plan be and it hereby
is amended, effective January 1, 1998, as follows:

                  1.       By substituting the following for Section 5.5 of the
Plan:

         "5.5     Payment of Benefits

                  When a Participant or his Beneficiary becomes entitled to a
         distribution pursuant to Section 5.2, 5.3 or 5.4, the amount available
         for distribution shall be paid to the Participant or his Beneficiary,
         as the case may be, in a lump sum; provided, however, if a
         Participant's vested account balance at the time of distribution (or
         any prior distribution) exceeds $5,000, distribution shall not be made
         to the Participant before he attains age 65 unless he consents
         thereto."

                  2.       By substituting "$5,000" for "$3,500" wherever the
latter appears in Section 5.6 of the Plan.
#### Schwandt (Dorothy), by Guardian *ad litem,*Respondent, vs. The Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company, Appellant. Schwandt (William), Respondent, vs. Same, Appellant.

*November 9*

December *7, 1943.*

*253For the appellant there were briefs by *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Carl Muskat.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *T. E. Wedemeyer,*attorney, and *Harry S. Sicula*of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Simla.*

BaRLOW, J.

. It is contended that appellant’s operator was free from causal negligence, as a matter of law, and that if not, the causal negligence of the plaintiff Dorothy Schwandt was as great or greater than appellant’s operator, as a matter of law. Upon a careful examination of the evidence we find that there is sufficient evidence to sustain the findings of the jury, and if no other question were involved the judgment would be affirmed without opinion under the rules and practice of this court.

The court ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiff Dorothy Schwandt, an infant, by William Schwandt, her guardian *ad litem,*against the Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company in the sum of $1,200 and also ordered judgment in favor of the plaintiff William Schwandt against the Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company in the sum of $255. The judgment, entered May 15, 1943, provides as follows:

“It is adjudged and decreed that the plaintiffs Dorothy Schwandt, an infant, by William Schwandt, her guardian *ad litem,*and William Schwandt do have and recover of and from the defendant, the Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company, a judgment in total sum of fourteen hundred fifty-five and 00/100 dollars ($1,455) together with its costs and disbursements taxed by the clerk of this court in the sum of one hundred eighty-six and 50/100 dollars ($186.50), making in all a total of sixteen hundred forty-one and 50/100 dollars ($1,641.50).”

This is error. Judgment should be entered as directed by the trial court. The consolidation of actions for trial does not *254permit the entry of a consolidated judgment. The order for judgment sets forth the amount of damages each plaintiff is to recover, and judgment should be entered accordingly.

In the application for review of the award to the plaintiff William Schwandt, it is contended that this should not be diminished by the forty per cent negligence assessed as attributable to the plaintiff Dorothy Schwandt, under the comparative-negligence statute, sec. 331.045. This question was fully considered and decided by this court in the case of *Callies v. Reliance Laundry Co.*(1925) 188 Wis. 376, 206 N. W. 198, and later affirmed in *Stuart v. Winnie*(1935), 217 Wis. 298, 258 N. W. 611, and it would serve no useful purpose to review the reásoning of the court in those cases. The damages awarded to the plaintiff William- Schwandt in the order for judgment is proper.

*By the Court.*— Modified and affirmed, with costs to- respondent. Causes remanded for further proceedings to correct the judgment in accordance with this opinion.
Docket No. FAA-2015-3985 Dir ID 2014-NM-182-AD

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 1/7/16

Regional Airline Association 1/7/16

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association David Oord 1/7/16

Airlines for America Robert Ireland 1/7/16
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 334

To amend the Federal Power Act to remove the jurisdiction of the Federal

Energy Regulatory Commission to license projects on fresh waters in

the State of Hawaii.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

FEBRUARY 3, 1999

Mr. AKAKA INTRODUCED THE FOLLOWING BILL; WHICH WAS READ TWICE

AND REFERRED TO THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES

A BILL

To amend the Federal Power Act to remove the jurisdiction

of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to license

projects on fresh waters in the State of Hawaii.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PROJECTS ON FRESH WATERS IN THE STATE

4 OF HAWAII.

5 Section 4(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

6 797(e)) is amended in the first sentence by striking ‘‘sev7 eral States, or upon’’ and inserting ‘‘several States (except
2

•S 334 IS

1 fresh waters in the State of Hawaii, unless a license would

2 be required under section 23), or upon’’.

Æ