alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the RegistrationStatements (Form S-8 No. 333-69024 and No. 333-101614) pertaining to theInformation Holdings Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan of our report dated February21, 2004 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of InformationHoldings Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) forthe year ended December 31, 2003.

 

 
|               | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |   |
|--------------------|---------------------------|--------|
|               |
| New York, New York |
| March 10, 2004     |

 

----
Moreover, a review of the clerk’s record supports the trial court’s certification. 1

COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DESIREE RASHELL PITTENGER,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 § 

No. 08-11-00118-CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 9

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC# 1224205) 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal states that this “is a

plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.” On June 9, 2011, the Clerk of this

Court notified Appellant’s counsel that it appeared that the appeal should be dismissed based on

the trial court’s certification. The Clerk requested that counsel file a response by June 19, 2011,

addressing whether Appellant has the right to appeal. No response has been received. Given the

trial court’s certification that Appellant has no right to appeal and the absence of any response to

the Clerk’s notice, we dismiss the appeal. See TEX.R.APP.P. 25.2(a)(2), (d).

1

July 13, 2011

DAVID WELLINGTON CHEW, Chief Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
**Exhibit32.1**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATESCODE**

Pursuant tosection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officers ofCorgenix Medical Corporation, a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), does herebycertify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for theyear ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities an Exchange Commission(the “10-QSB Report”) that:

i.                     the10-KSB Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.                  theinformation contained in the 10-KSB Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Dated:                 September29, 2006

**ThisCertification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject tothe knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.**

**A signedoriginal of this written statement required by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to the Company and will be retained by theCompany and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request. This written statement shall not be deemed to be “filed” as partof the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB that it accompanies.**
| /S/Douglass T. Simpson                |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

1

----
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belvedere Resources Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shawn Englmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated this 30th day of July, 2009.   Shawn Englmann  Shawn Englmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial   -1-
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

931 

TP 16-00104 

PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ. 

 

JEFFREY JOSEPH, PETITIONER, 

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, 

NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 

AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, 

RESPONDENT. 

 

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF

COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER. 

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial

Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M.

Mohun, A.J.], entered January 14, 2016) to review a determination of

respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that

petitioner had violated various inmate rules. 

It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously

dismissed without costs as moot (see Matter of Free v Coombe, 234 AD2d

996). 

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
Exhibit 99.1

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Accompanying Periodic Report
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)

I, Patricia Costante, the Chief Executive Officer of The MIIX Group,
Incorporated, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that the Annual Form 10-K of The MIIX Group, Incorporated for the
quarterly period ended December 31, 2003 (the "MIIX Group Annual Form 10-K"),
which this certification accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)) and information contained in the MIIX Group Annual Form 10-K fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of The MIIX Group, Incorporated.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to The MIIX Group, Incorporated and will be retained by The MIIX Group,
Incorporated and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

                                        /s/ Patricia A. Costante
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Patricia A. Costante
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Dated: March 31, 2002
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 454 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-54, K2025-53.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24061 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3438 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to postpone the 

effective date of high-impact rules pending judicial review. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3438 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Require Evaluation 

3 before Implementing Executive Wishlists Act of 2016’’ or 

4 as the ‘‘REVIEW Act of 2016’’. 

5 SEC. 2. RELIEF PENDING REVIEW. 

6 Section 705 of title 5, United States Code, is amend7 ed— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘When’’ and inserting the fol9 lowing: 

10 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—When’’; and 

11 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

12 ‘‘(b) HIGH-IMPACT RULES.— 

13 ‘‘(1) DEFINITIONS.—In this subsection— 

14 ‘‘(A) the term ‘Administrator’ means the 

15 Administrator of the Office of Information and 

16 Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management 

17 and Budget; and 

18 ‘‘(B) the term ‘high-impact rule’ means 

19 any rule that the Administrator determines may 

20 impose an annual cost on the economy of not 

21 less than $1,000,000,000. 

22 ‘‘(2) IDENTIFICATION.—A final rule may not be 

23 published or take effect until the agency making the 

24 rule submits the rule to the Administrator and the 

25 Administrator makes a determination as to whether 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3438 RFS

1 the rule is a high-impact rule, which shall be pub2 lished by the agency with the final rule. 

3 ‘‘(3) RELIEF.— 

4 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

5 subparagraph (B), an agency shall postpone the 

6 effective date of a high-impact rule of the agen7 cy until the final disposition of all actions seek8 ing judicial review of the rule. 

9 ‘‘(B) FAILURE TO TIMELY SEEK JUDICIAL

10 REVIEW.—Notwithstanding section 553(d), if 

11 no person seeks judicial review of a high-impact 

12 rule— 

13 ‘‘(i) during any period explicitly pro14 vided for judicial review under the statute 

15 authorizing the making of the rule; or 

16 ‘‘(ii) if no such period is explicitly pro17 vided for, during the 60-day period begin18 ning on the date on which the high-impact 

19 rule is published in the Federal Register, 

20 the high-impact rule may take effect as early as 

21 the date on which the applicable period ends. 

22 ‘‘(4) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in 

23 this subsection may be construed to impose any limi24 tation under law on any court against the issuance 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

HR 3438 RFS

1 of any order enjoining the implementation of any 

2 rule.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Monday, August 17, 2015 10:23 AM

To: 'tpierrelee@suddenlink.net'

Cc: May, Rick (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - FAA-2015-2269

Dear Mr. Pierrelee:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

2269).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

•             Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s) (i.e., fixed wing, rotorcraft, lighter than air) for the proposed

UAS operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload).  This information can be

located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any

proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via email to 333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us

to process your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 9/1/15.  If we do not receive

the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Jinzhao Wu, certify that:  1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Northern Medical Device, Inc. for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008;  2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and  5.  The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  August 14, 2008  /s/Jinzhao Wu Jinzhao Wu President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Wallgate Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2012 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 11, 2013
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350,as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Information Holdings Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2004 (the “Report”),I, Vincent A. Chippari, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in allmaterial respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| March 15, 2004 | /s/ Vincent A. Chippari                              |   |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|           | Vincent A. Chippari                                  |
|           | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|           | (Principal Financial Officer)                        |

 

 

A signed original statement of this written statement required bySection 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwiseadopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic versionof this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided toInformation Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Information Holdings Inc. andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
Exhibit 99.15

CONSENT OF ENGINEER

Ladies and
Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigneds name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with (a) the report entitled Technical Report on the Hairhan Uranium Exploration Property in Mongolia dated March 23, 2011 and (b) the report entitled the
Technical Report on a Mineral Resource Update for the Phoenix Uranium Deposits dated December 31, 2012, and (2) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of
Denison Mines Corp.

Dated: March 19, 2014



|                                                           
|-----------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ William Roscoe                                         
|William Roscoe, Ph.D., P.Eng. Roscoe Postle
Associates Inc.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00278

- CV

Susan Rebecca CAMMACK

, Appellant

v.

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a The Bank of New York as Trustee for the

Certificateholders of CWABS 2004

- 05,

Appellee

From the 198th Judicial District Court, Kerr County, Texas

Trial Court No. 17902C

Honorable Susan Harris, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE RIOS , AND JUSTICE WATKINS

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is

AFFIRMED. It is ordered that no costs of appeal shall be assessed against appellant in relation to

this appeal because she qualifies as indigent under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 20.

SIGNED May 8, 2019.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 May  6, 2009
    
    /s/  John M. CurtisJohn M. CurtisPresident and Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Vangent and will be retained
by Vangent and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.