alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 13 , 2020.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 19

- 00146

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF ESTANISLADA RODRIGUEZ, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 3

Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court C ause No. 12

- CPR

- 025070

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an atte mpted appeal from a n order signed February 1, 2019, for the dependent administrator Terry Garcia to pay attorney ’ s fee s and expenses

. On Ju ly 15, 2020, this court informed the parties that it wou ld c o nsider dismissal of the appeal on its own motion for want of jurisdiction
, see Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a),
because the record reflects that the order is inter locutory and not appealable under
Dumitrov v. Hitt , 601 S.W.2d 472, 473 (Tex. App.

— Houston [14th Dis t .] 1980,
writ ref ’ d n.r.e.) ( applying the predecessor of Tex. Estates Code § 352.051 ; reasoning that the “ approval of such an expense by the probate court is not a final2

judgment; that order may be reviewed and corrected in a settlement of the final

a ccou n t ” ).
This court notified the parties that the appeal would be dismissed unless any party filed a response on or before July 27, 2020 , showing meritorious groun ds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). No party filed a response.

Acco rdi ng ly, w e dismiss t he appeal

.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Christopher, Wise, and Zimmerer.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Charles E. Phillips, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this amended annual report on
Form 10-K/A of Infor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 29, 2013 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ CHARLES E. PHILLIPS, JR.        
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Charles E. Phillips, Jr.            
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ridgestone Resources, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Pardeep Sarai, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 4thday of October, 2007.                                                                                                                  
|   

PARDEEP SARAIPardeep SaraiChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













---
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of SN Strategies Corp. a Nevada corporation
        (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as
        filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
        “Report”), Michael A. Hawks, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies
        to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
        pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              The
                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                  15(d) of
                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                  and
 
 (2)
              The
                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                  Company.
 
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        SN Strategies Corp., and will be retained by SN Strategies Corp. and furnished
        to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.
 
 
 /s/
                    Michael A. Hawks
 Michael
              A. Hawks
 Chief
        Financial Officer
 November
        2, 2007
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for

the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category

DATABASE REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01177.A03

Attachment file will be sent on CD

.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rosca, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Christian Mancillas,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
26th day of September, 2007.


/s/ Christian Mancillas
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.17

CONSENT OF ENGINEER

Ladies and
Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigneds name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled Technical Report on the Midwest A Uranium Deposit of Saskatchewan, Canada dated January 31, 2008, and (2) all other references to the undersigned
included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp.

Dated: March 19, 2014



|                                                                                              
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Michel Dagbert                                                                            
|Michel Dagbert, P.Eng. (Retired) SGS Canada
Inc. (formerly Geostat Systems International Inc.)
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 83 (Monday, April 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25525]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10363]

[[Page 25525]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Thirteenth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
thirteenth meeting of RTCA Special Committee 224, Airport Security 
Access Control Systems

DATES: The meeting will be held May 30, 2012, from 10:00 a.m.-4:00 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, Inc., 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 833-
9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 203. The agenda will 
include the following:

May 30, 2012

     Welcome/Introductions/Administrative Remarks
     Review/Approve Summary--Twelfth Meeting
     Updates from the TSA (as required)
     Workgroup Reports
     Industry Solicitation Progress Report
     Time and Place of Next Meeting
     Any Other Business
     Adjourn
     Other Business
     Date, Place, and Time for Plenary Twenty-Two
     Plenary Adjourns
    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 24, 2012.
John Raper,
Manager, Business Operations Branch, Federal Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-10363 Filed 4-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

April 28, 2014

s0421 

# Order

Clerk April 28, 2014

148398

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148398

COA: 317409

Kent CC: 11

- 004765

- FH

MARTIN JAY DEFOUW,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the November 6, 2013

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.1  Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Clear Skies Solar, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, Ezra J. Green, the Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Clear Skies Solar, Inc. and Arthur L. Goldberg, the Chief Financial Officer of Clear Skies Solar, Inc., each certifies that:  1.the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/ Ezra J. GreenName:Ezra J. GreenTitle:Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Dated:November 16, 2009By:/s/ Arthur L. GoldbergName:Arthur L. GoldbergTitle:Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Dated:November 16, 2009
#### Estate of Laus: State Department of Public Welfare, Appellant, vs. Laus, Administrator, and another, Respondents.

*January 9*

February *4, 1941.*

*13For the appellant there were briefs by *Blaine M. Linke,*collection and deportation counsel, and *Paul B. Knuese,*assistant collection and deportation counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Knuese.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Ray J. Fink,*attorney, and *Allan B. Adams,*guardian *ad litem,*both of Menasha, and oral argument by *Mr. Fink.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

This case is ruled by *Estate of Hahto,*236 Wis. 65, 294 N. W. 500, decided November 8, 1940.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Post-merger
    
    
    Pre-merger
    
    
    Pre-merger
    
    
    Pre-merger
    
    
    Pre-mergerPeriod from
    
    
    Period from
    
    
    Period from July
    
    
    Nine months
    
    
    Three monthsJuly 31 through
    
    
    January 1
    
    
    1 through July
    
    
    ended
    
    
    endedSeptember 30,
    
    
    through July 30,
    
    
    30,
    
    
    September 30,
    
    
    September 30,(In thousands, except per share data)
    
    2008
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2007Basic and diluted Numerator:Income (loss) before
discontinued operations
    
    $
    (43,719
    )
    
    $
    396,289
    
    
    $
    (42,397
    )
    
    $
    564,424
    
    
    $
    253,398Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net
    
    
    (1,013
    )
    
    
    640,236
    
    
    
    (3,058
    )
    
    
    53,524
    
    
    
    26,338Net income (loss)  basic and
diluted
    
    $
    (44,732
    )
    
    $
    1,036,525
    
    
    $
    (45,455
    )
    
    $
    617,948
    
    
    $
    279,736Denominator:Weighted average common
shares  basic
    
    
    81,242
    
    
    
    495,044
    
    
    
    495,465
    
    
    
    494,261
    
    
    
    494,568Effect of dilutive securities:Stock options and
restricted stock
    
    
    252
    
    
    
    1,475
    
    
    
    340
    
    
    
    1,319
    
    
    
    1,600Less: anti-dilutive items
    
    
    (252
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (340
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Denominator for net income per
common share  diluted
    
    
    81,242
    
    
    
    496,519
    
    
    
    495,465
    
    
    
    495,580
    
    
    
    496,168Net income (loss) per basic
common share:Income (loss) before
discontinued operations
    
    $
    (.54
    )
    
    $
    .80
    
    
    $
    (.09
    )
    
    $
    1.14
    
    
    $
    .52Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net
    
    
    (.01
    )
    
    
    1.29
    
    
    
    (.00
    )
    
    
    .11
    
    
    
    .05Basic
    
    $
    (.55
    )
    
    $
    2.09
    
    
    $
    (.09
    )
    
    $
    1.25
    
    
    $
    .57Net income (loss) per diluted
common share:Income (loss) before
discontinued operations
    
    $
    (.54
    )
    
    $
    .80
    
    
    $
    (.09
    )
    
    $
    1.14
    
    
    $
    .51Income (loss) from
discontinued operations, net
    
    
    (.01
    )
    
    
    1.29
    
    
    
    (.00
    )
    
    
    .11
    
    
    
    .05Diluted
    
    $
    (.55
    )
    
    $
    2.09
    
    
    $
    (.09
    )
    
    $
    1.25
    
    
    $
    .56
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 446 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-39, K2025-38.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24047 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
PHIL BRYANT GOVERNOR September 18, 2015 Ms. Heather McTeer Toney Regional Administrator U
.S. Environmental Protection Agency- Region
4 61 Forsyth Street, S.W. Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8909 Dear Ms. Toney: Re: Mississippi Updated Designation Recommendation
for the 2010 Sulfur Dioxide Standard Consent Decree In accordance with the Federal Clean Air Act and the consent decree issued by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California onMarch 2, 2015,

I am providing an updated recommendation
for the State of Mississippi's designation for the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) 2010 national ambient air quality standards for sulfur dioxide (S02). EPA identified the South Mississippi Electric Power Association (SMEPA)

R
.D. Morrow, Sr. Generating Plant located in Lamar County asthe only sourcein the state that metthe criteria established

in the consent decree.
In order to meet the consent decree requirements, SMEPA coordinated with the Mississippi Department
of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) to perform anair emissions dispersion modeling analysis to determine the attainment status for the affected area

.The attached modeling report results state that the facility attained the 75 parts perbillion (ppb) 1-hour S0 2standard for the 2012-2014 period by reporting

aconcentration
of 56 ppb. Therefore,

I request that EPA designate SMEPA and Lamar County asunclassifiable/attainment based on the modeling results

.If youhave any questions, please contact Jerry Beasley at jbeasley@deq.state.ms.us

orat (601) 961-5134

. Sincerely, **Clit ~~**  Attachment Cc: Mr
.Gary Rikard, Executive Director, MDEQ STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

•OFFICE OFTHE GOVERNOR POST OFFICE BOX 139•JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI 39205

•TELEPHONE: (601) 359-3150

•FAX: (601) 359-3 741• www.governorbryant.com
EXHIBIT 32.1


      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Annual Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.


December 18, 2003                  By: /s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                           Richard F. Bennett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
EX-35.6


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, New York 10005


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage
    Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE4

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 7, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
#### State, Respondent, vs. Graff, Appellant.

*March 15*—

April *12, 1946.*

*577
      *Charles L. Mullen*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by the *Attorney General, William A.*Plats, assistant attorney general, and *G. E. Otten,*district attorney of Washington county, and oral argument by *Mr. Plats.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

It appears without dispute that defendant had the benefit of counsel before he entered his plea of guilty. Upon the hearing on the motion for a new trial, counsel for defendant testified that he had no doubt of the defendant’s guilt, and denied the allegations made by the defendant in the affidavit supporting his motion for a new trial as to not having advised the defendant of the seriousness of the offense, denied making any promise to him that he would be placed on probation.

*578The principal contention made on behalf of the defendant is that there was a medical examination of the child and that that examination did not disclose facts sufficient to establish an offense. We do not think it is necessary to set out the details of this matter. The granting or denial of the motion for a new trial was largely within the discretion of the trial court, and it is clear from the record that there was no abuse of discretion on its part in denying the motion for a new trial. There is not even a pretense that there was any error so far as the judgment was concerned. The claim that there was a denial of due process is also completely refuted and has no basis of fact upon which to rest. The facts stated by the defendant in his confession freely made negative the contention made here by counsel on his behalf. The condition found by the examining physician strongly supports the facts stated by the defendant in his confession.

*By the Court.*— The judgment and order appealed from are affirmed.

Rector, J., took no part.