alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OFA MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 01-4248



# 
J OSE H ERNANDEZ -C ARBAJAL ,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-00-297) Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 20, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL Louis C. Allen, III, Federal Public Defender, William S. Trivette, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellant. Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Steven H. Levin, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Jose Hernandez-Carbajal appeals the sentence imposed followinghis guilty plea to re-entry after deportation by an alien previously convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1326(a),(b)(2) (West 1999) and distributing 28.3 grams of cocaine hydrochloride, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C) (West 1999 & Supp. 2001). Hernandez-Carbajal’s attorney has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states there are no meritorious issues for appeal, but contends on Hernandez-Carbajal’s behalf that the district court erred in sentencing him to seventy-eight months’ imprisonment, which was within theguidelines range of seventy to eighty-seven months. HernandezCarbajal was informed of his right to file a pro se supplemental brief but has not done so. As Hernandez-Carbajal presents no challenge to the calculation of the guidelines range but merely contends his sentence was too high within the correct range, we find he is not entitled to appellate review on his claim. See United States v. Jones , 18 F.3d 1145, 1150-51 (4th Cir. 1994); United States v. Porter , 909 F.2d 789, 794 (4th Cir. 1990).In addition, we have examined the entire record in this case in accordance with the requirements of Anders and find no meritorious issues for appeal. We therefore affirm Hernandez-Carbajal’s conviction and sentence. We deny counsel’s motion to withdraw at this time. This courtrequires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. Ifrequested by the client to do so, counsel should prepare a timely petition for writ of certiorari, unless counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous. In that case, counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state 2 U NITED S TATES v. H ERNANDEZ -C ARBAJALthat a copy thereof was served on the client. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. H ERNANDEZ -C ARBAJAL
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Dale B. Schenk, President and Chief Executive Officer of Prothena Corporation plc (the “Company”) and Tran B. Nguyen, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certify that, to the best of his knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year endedDecember 31, 2013, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:June 6, 2014/s/ Dale B. SchenkDale B. SchenkPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)/s/ Tran B. NguyenTran B. NguyenChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this quarterly report of Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  April 30, 2010 | s/Steve N. Slilaty____________________

Steve N. Slilaty, Chief Executive Officer |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |                                                                              |
| Dated:  April 30, 2010 | s/Camille Sebaaly____________________

Camille Sebaaly, Chief Financial Officer   |
| (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                             |                       |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|----------------------------|
|   |                                             | /s/      Richard      Cole |
|   | Name:      Richard Cole,                         |
|   | Title:      Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal      Executive Officer)               |

|   |                                  |                |
|--------|---------------------------------------|---------------------|
|   |                                  | /s/      Keith Wesp |
|   | Name:      Keith Wesp,                |
|   | Title:      Vice President of Finance |
|   | (Principal      Financial Officer)    |
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3239

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

OCTOBER 26, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide

special immigrant status for certain United States international broadcasting employees.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 3239 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT STATUS FOR CERTAIN

2 UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL BROAD3 CASTING EMPLOYEES.

4 (a) SPECIAL IMMIGRANT CATEGORY.—Section

5 101(a)(27) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8

6 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

8 (K);

9 (2) by striking the period at the end of sub10 paragraph (L); and

11 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub12 paragraph:

13 ‘‘(M) subject to the numerical limitations of

14 section 203(b)(4), an immigrant who seeks to enter

15 the United States to work as a broadcaster in the

16 United States for the International Broadcasting

17 Bureau of the Broadcasting Board of Governors, or

18 for a grantee of the Broadcasting Board of Gov19 ernors, and the immigrant’s accompanying spouse

20 and children.’’.

21 (b) NUMERICAL LIMITATIONS.—

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 203(b)(4) of the Im23 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(4))

24 is amended by inserting before the period at the end

25 the following: ‘‘, and not more than 100 may be

26 made available in any fiscal year to special immi-
3

S 3239 RFH

1 grants, excluding spouses and children, who are de2 scribed in section 101(a)(27)(M)’’.

3 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made

4 by paragraph (1) shall apply to visas made available

5 in any fiscal year beginning on or after October 1,

6 2000.

Passed the Senate October 25 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-23-00178-CR

RUDOLPH GUY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District 

Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1578056)

September 7, 2023

Memorandum Opinion by Chief 

Justice Sudderth

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that the 

appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Bonnie Sudderth

 Chief Justice Bonnie Sudderth
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 3.1.3


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT

                                       OF

                          CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

                                       OF

                       ORBITAL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

                         PURSUANT TO SECTION 242 OF THE
                GENERAL CORPORATION LAW OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

      I, Alan L. Parker, President of Orbital Communications Corporation (the
"Corporation"), a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State
of Delaware, do hereby certify as follows:

            The Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby
      amended so that paragraph 5 thereof reads in its entirety as follows:

            5.    The total number of shares of stock that this corporation
                  shall have authority to issue is 8,000,000 shares of Common
                  Stock, $.0l par value per share. Each share of Common Stock
                  shall be entitled to one vote.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and the seal of the Corporation
this 15th day of June, 1994.






                                              /s/ ALAN L. PARKER
                                              -------------------------
    (CORPORATE SEAL)                          Alan L. Parker, President



ATTEST:


/s/ MARY ELLEN SERAVALLI
-----------------------------------------
Mary Ellen Seravalli, Assistant Secretary
Exhibit 10.70

                                  R. Paul Gray
                             43389 Deepspring Court
                             Ashburn, Virginia 20147

May 22, 2002





C5 Health, Inc.
One Sarasota Tower
2 North Tamiami Trail, Suite 608
Sarasota, Florida  34236

I, R. Paul Gray,  hereby  extend all  outstanding  promissory  notes due from C5
Health,  Inc.  until  December 31, 2002.  These notes will not be  considered in
default until December 31, 2002.

Sincerely,


/s/ R. Paul Gray
R. Paul Gray

RPG/amp
## NUMBER 13

- 21

- 00047

- CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

CARLOS GONZALEZ

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee.

On appeal from the 214 th District Court

of Nueces C ounty, Texas.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Tijerina

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina

Appellant, Carlos Gonzalez, attempts to appeal the trial court’s overruling of

defendant’s objection to a polygraph examination

. The trial court entered an order on

January 19, 2021, overruling appellant’s objection to the polygraph examination

- as a

condition of probation

.2

On February 8, 2021 , the c lerk of this c ourt notified appellant it appeared that the

order from which the appeal was taken was not a final, appealable order, and requested

the defect be cured within thirty days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant failed

to respond to the Court’s no tice

.

Generally, a state appellate court only has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a

criminal defendant where there has been a final judgment of conviction. Workman v.

State, 170 Tex. Crim . 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); McKown v. State

, 915 S.W.2d

160, 161 (Tex. App.

– Fort Worth 1996, no pet.). Exceptions to the general rule include: (1)

certain appeals while on deferred adjudication community supervision, Kirk v. State , 942

S.W.2d 624, 6 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); (2) appeals from the denial of a motion to reduce

bond, Tex. R. App. P. 31.1; McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161; and (3) certain appeals from

the denial of habeas corpus relief, Wright v. State , 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.

--

Dallas 199 8, no pet.); McKown , 915 S.W.2d at 161.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the notice of appeal , is of the

opinion t hat there is not an appealable order and this Court lacks jurisdiction over the

matters herein. Accordingly, we d ismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

JAIME TIJERINA

Justice

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2 ( b ).

Delivered and filed on the

27t h day of May , 202 1

.
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q
of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, James E. Lesch, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ James E. Lesch     
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | James E. Lesch         
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of EZJR, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Edward Zimbardi, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of my knowledge andbelief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.	The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

ii.	The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2014

 

 

/s/ Edward Zimbardi	

Name: Edward Zimbardi

Title: Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 377 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 377

    To eliminate the special reserve funds created for the Savings 
  Association Insurance Fund and the Deposit Insurance Fund, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            February 4, 1999

 Mr. Enzi (for himself and Mr. Johnson) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, 
                           and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To eliminate the special reserve funds created for the Savings 
  Association Insurance Fund and the Deposit Insurance Fund, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF SAIF AND DIF SPECIAL RESERVES.

    (a) SAIF Special Reserve.--Section 11(a)(6) of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1821(a)(6)) is amended by striking 
subparagraph (L).
    (b) DIF Special Reserve.--Section 2704 of the Deposit Insurance 
Funds Act of 1996 (12 U.S.C. 1821 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (b); and
            (2) in subsection (d)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (4);
                    (B) in paragraph (6)(C)(i), by striking ``(6) and 
                (7)'' and inserting ``(5), (6), and (7)''; and
                    (C) in paragraph (6)(C), by striking clause (ii) 
                and inserting the following:
                            ``(ii) by redesignating paragraph (8) as 
                        paragraph (5).''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals
San Antonio, Texas

April 6, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00129

- CV

Stanton P. BELL , et al.

, Appellants

v.

CHESAPEAKE ENERGY CORPORATION , et al.,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CI22093 Honorable Cathleen M. Stryker, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Pursuant to section 51.014(d) of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code and Rule 28.3 of the Texas R ules of Appellate Procedure, we GRANT the cross

- petition s for permission to appeal from an interlocutory order. Cross

- notices of appeal are deemed to have been filed on the date of this order and the cross

- appeal s will proceed as accelerated appeal s

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 28.3(k).

We ORDER the district clerk t o file the clerk’s record in this court on or before April 16, 2018

. We ORDER the court reporter to file the reporter’s record in this court on or before April 16, 2018

.

We order the clerk of this court to fil e a copy of this order with the District Clerk of Bexar C ounty, Texas. See id. We further order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this order on the district clerk, the court reporter, and all counsel.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the s aid court on this 6th day of April, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court