alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this quarterly report of Sunshine Biopharma, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated:  December 22, 2009 | s/Steve N. Slilaty____________________

Steve N. Slilaty, Chief Executive Officer |
|---------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                                              |
| Dated:  December 22, 2009 | s/Camille Sebaaly____________________

Camille Sebaaly, Chief Financial Officer   |
*February 15, 1946.*

#### Dorsha, Respondent, vs. Dorsha, Appellant.

For the appellant: *Cashin & Dunn*of Stevens Point.

For the respondent: *Fisher, Reinholdt & Peickert*of Stevens Point.

*By the Court.*

— That part of judgment appealed from is affirmed.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

COREY BROWN, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3657

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed November 6, 2019.

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for 

Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, Judge.

Corey Brown, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Veridien Corporation (the "Company") hereby certifies
to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.


Date:  May 1, 2003                  Name:  /s/ Sheldon C. Fenton
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Sheldon C. Fenton
                                    Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                           Acting Chief Financial Officer
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



We consent to the  incorporation  by  reference in the  Registration  Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-129714,  333-126771,  333-51496 and 333-104389)  pertaining to
the  stock  option  plans  of  Scottish  Re  Group  Limited  and  (Form  S-3 No.
333-113030)  pertaining to the shelf  registration  of securities of Scottish Re
Group  Limited  of our  reports  dated  March  13,  2006,  with  respect  to the
consolidated  financial  statements  of Scottish Re Group  Limited,  Scottish Re
Group Limited's management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over  financial  reporting,  and the  effectiveness  of  internal  control  over
financial reporting of Scottish Re Group Limited, included in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2005.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 13, 2006
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7555

JOHN A. CASILLAS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MICKEY RAY, Warden of Federal Correctional

Institution, Estill,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. David C. Norton, District Judge.

(CR-90-314, CA-96-1638-9-18JC)

Submitted: January 23, 1997 Decided: February 5, 1997

Before RUSSELL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John A. Casillas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's orders denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning

of the district court. Casillas v. Ray, Nos. CR-90-314; CA-96-1638-

9-18JC (D.S.C. Sept. 12, 1996). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 37 (Friday, February 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 11188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4298]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

[Docket No. DOT-OST-2004-16951]

Request for Comments of a Reinstatement of a Previously Approved 
Information Collection

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information 
Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below is being forwarded to the 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comments. A 
Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting 
comments on the following information collection was published on 
November 8, 2011 (76 FR 69320). No comments were received.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before March 26, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lauralyn Remo, Air Carrier Fitness 
Division (X-56), Office of Aviation Analysis, Office of the Secretary, 
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, 
DC 20590, (202) 366-9721.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Aircraft Accident Liability Insurance, 14 CFR Part 205.
    OMB Control Number: 2106-0030.
    Type of Request: Reinstatement of a Previously Approved Information 
Collection.
    Abstract: 14 CFR Part 205 contains the minimum requirements for air 
carrier accident liability insurance to protect the public from losses, 
and directs that certificates evidencing appropriate coverage must be 
filed with the Department.
    Respondents: U.S. and foreign air carriers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,308.
    Annual Estimated Total Burden on Respondents: 1,854 hours.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.

ADDRESSES: Send comments regarding the burden estimate, including 
suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Management and 
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of the Secretary of 
Transportation, 725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of 
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of 
the Department, including whether the information will have practical 
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility 
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize 
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including 
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of 
information technology.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 17, 2012.
Patricia Lawton,
Departmental PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4298 Filed 2-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P
```
**Exhibit 31.1****Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act**I, Frank C. Ingriselli, certify that:1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-QSB of Pacific Asia Petroleum, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financialreporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  November 9, 2007 By:  /s/ Frank C. Ingriselli    Name:  Frank C. Ingriselli    Title:  President and Chief Executive Officer
#### Warder-Bushnell & Glessner Company, Appellant, v. J. D. Harris *et*al., Appellees.

Conversion : agency. One charged with the unlawful seizure and conversion of personal property cannot escape liability therefor upon the ground that the seizure and conversion were made by him simply as the agent of another.

*Appeal from Osceola District Court.*— Hon. C. H. Lewis, Judge.

Thursday, October 16, 1890.

ActioN at law for certain wheat, other grain and flax, owned by plaintiff, which was taken by defendants, and converted to their use. The cause, as to defendant Harris, was tried to the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

*D. D.*McCallum, for appellant.

*O. J.*Clarke, for appellee.

*154Beck, J.

I. The abstract shows that defendant Hams answered the petition, and the trial was as to him alone. His answer admits the taking of the property, and alleges that he was acting in the matter as the agent, and under the direction of his codefendant Close, who was the owner thereof under a mortgage. All other ■allegations of the petition are denied. It is admitted ¡by the parties that plaintiff held the property under a ■mortgage which was prior and paramount to the mortgage under which the defendants claim it. It is admitted that Harris had constructive, though not actual, notice ■of plaintiff’s mortgage.

II. We are authorized to conclude that the district court found for defendant on the ground that he took the property while acting as agent of Close. The admitted facts are that defendant took the property ; and the conclusion of law is that, as between plaintiff and defendant, the plaintiff had the right to the possession of the property under the mortgage, the ownership thereof 'being vested in plaintiff, the mortgagee. Code, sec. 1927; *Gordon v.*Hardin, 83 Iowa, 550; *Doane v. Garretson,*24 Iowa, 351. The defendant Harris took and converted this property. He is liable for damages. The fact that he was agent of his codefendant does not discharge him from this liability. The act was not done under a contract. It was done in violation of plaintiff’s rights, and without the sanction of law. It was, therefore, a tort, for which he is presumably liable. Story on Agency, sec. 308. The capacity in which a tort-feasor acts, whether as agent, trustee, servant or public -officer, does no,t protect him from liability for his torts. The court below erred in rendering judgment for defendant. Reversed.
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Ezra J. GreenName:
    
    Ezra J. GreenTitle:
    
    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Dated:
    
    August 12, 2008By:
    
    /s/ Arthur L. GoldbergName:
    
    Arthur L. GoldbergTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Dated:
    
    August 12, 2008
## In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 13

- 00170

- CR

CLAYTON MARQUIS RICKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Red River County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR01943

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION

Clayton Marquis Ricks appeals from hi s conviction by a jury of the offense of burglary of

a habitation. Ricks argues that the trial court erred in denying his oral motion for continuance.

The request for a continuance was prompted by the State ’s presentation to defense counsel after

jury selection, of a written statement made by Ricks. Ricks promptly requested a continuance

,

which was denied by the trial court. We find that error was not preserved and affirm the

judgment of the trial court.

Ricks’ motion for continuance was read into the record by Ricks’ counsel, but there is

no thing in the record to suggest that it was written or sworn to by Ricks. The Texas Court of

Criminal Appeals recently reaffirmed that a written, sworn motion for continuance is required by

statute an d that, without such a motion, no error is preserved for appellate review. Blackshear v.

State , 385 S.W.3d 589, 5 90

– 91 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).

Thus, by failing to file a written, sworn motion requesting a continuance, Ricks forfeited

his right to challen ge the trial court’s denial of a continuance. Id. at 591; Anderson v. State , 301

S.W.3d 276, 279 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN

. art . 29.03, 29.08

(West 20 06 ) (trial court may grant continuance only upon written motion

, sworn to by State or

defendant, setting forth sufficient cause).

Where an issue has not been properly preserved for appeal, the court of appeals may not

address the merits of that issue. Blackshear , 385 S.W.3d at 591. The contention of error is

overruled

.3 The judg ment of the trial court is affirmed.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: May 22, 2014

Date Decided: June 13 , 2014

Do Not Publish
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2958 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2958

   To establish a national clearinghouse for youth entrepreneurship 
                   education, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2000

 Mr. Santorum introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To establish a national clearinghouse for youth entrepreneurship 
                   education, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NATIONAL CLEARINGHOUSE FOR YOUTH ENTREPRENEURSHIP EDUCATION.

    (a) National Clearinghouse.--The Secretary of Education may award a 
grant or contract to an organization or institution, with substantial 
experience in curriculum-based entrepreneurship education, to establish 
a national clearinghouse for youth entrepreneurship education. The 
purpose of the clearinghouse shall be to facilitate professional 
development opportunities for teachers, stimulate community 
partnerships with businesses, youth agencies, and nonprofit entities 
(including faith-based, non-profit, and other local organizations), 
collect and disseminate curricular materials, and undertake other 
activities to encourage teacher interest and involvement in 
entrepreneurship education, especially for students in grades 7 through 
12.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $500,000 for each of the fiscal 
years 2001, 2002, and 2003.

SEC. 2. USE OF FUNDS FROM OTHER PROGRAMS FOR YOUTH ENTREPRENEURSHIP.

    For the purposes of each program under the following provisions of 
law, supporting a curriculum-based youth entrepreneurship education 
program with a demonstrated record of empowering disadvantaged youth 
with applied mathematics, entrepreneurial, and other analytical skills 
shall be considered to be an eligible use of funds provided under such 
program:
            (1) subparts 1 and 2 of part D, and part E, of title I of 
        the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965;
            (2) subparts 1, 2, and 4 of part A, and part B, of title 
        III of such Act;
            (3) subparts 1 and 2 of part A of title IV of such Act;
            (4) parts B and C of title VI of such Act; and
            (5) part A, and subparts 1 and 2 of part J, of title X of 
        such Act.
                                 <all>
```
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84350]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24436]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Notice of Meeting Held With Less Than Seven Days Advance Notice

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m. on October 17, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting was held in the FDIC Board Room, 550 17th Street NW, 
Washington, DC, and was webcast to the public.

STATUS: Open to public observation via webcast.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Pursuant to the provisions of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is given 
that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation's Board of Directors met 
in open session to consider the following matters:

Summary Agenda

    Designated Reserve Ratio for 2025.
    Delay of Compliance Date for Subpart A Amendments to FDIC Official 
Sign and Advertising Rule.
    Minutes of a Board of Directors' Meeting Previously Distributed.

Discussion Agenda

    Briefing: Semi-annual Update on the Deposit Insurance Fund (DIF) 
Restoration Plan.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In calling the meeting, the Board 
determined, on motion of Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer 
Financial Protection Bureau), seconded by Director Michael J. Hsu 
(Acting Comptroller of the Currency), by the unanimous vote of Chairman 
Martin J. Gruenberg, Vice Chairman Travis J. Hill, Director Jonathan P. 
McKernan, Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), 
and Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection 
Bureau), that Corporation business required its consideration of the 
matters on less than seven days' notice to the public; and that no 
earlier notice of the meeting than that previously provided on October 
11, 2024, was practicable.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Direct requests for further 
information concerning the meeting to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on October 17, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-24436 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and                                |
|   |                                                                                                                                                           |
| (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of      operations of the Company. |

|                |                                        |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Dated: May 15, 2009 |                                        |
|                |                                        |
|                | /s/ Richard Cole                            |
|                |                                             |
|                | Name: Richard Cole,                         |
|                | Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|                | (Principal Executive Officer)               |
|                |                                        |
|                | /s/ Keith Wesp                              |
|                |                                             |
|                | Name: Keith Wesp,                           |
|                | Title: Vice President of Finance            |
|                | (Principal Financial Officer)               |

----