alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20732 and #20733; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20014]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated 10/05/2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Helene.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/23/2024 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/07/2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         12/04/2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         07/07/2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of Florida, dated 10/05/2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Alachua, Bradford, Duval, Union.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-24184 Filed 10-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
### The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Southern District of Iowa. ___________ No. 96-1534

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Southern District of Iowa. Francisco Javier Chavira * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: November 12, 1996 Filed: November 22, 1996

___________ Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Fran cisco Javier Chavira and a codefendant were charged wit h conspi ring to possess cocaine and marijuana with intent to distribut e (Counts I and II), inviolation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and possessing cocaine and marijuana with intent to distribute (Counts III and IV), i n violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 (1994) . Chavira pleaded guilty to Count III. The District Court sentenced him to 1 46 months imprisonment and four years supervised release. Onappeal, Chavira's appointed counsel moved to withdraw and file d a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), discussing wh ether Chavira was entitled to a two-level reduction as a mino r participant under United States Sentencing

### -2-

Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2(b) (1995). We granted counsel leave to withdraw . Although Chavira was granted leave to file a pro se supplemental brief, he did not do so.
Becaus e Chavira did not object to the presentence report or a t sentencing, we review the District Court's failure to grant Chavira a mino r partic ipant reduction for plain error resulting in a miscarriage o f justice. See United States v. Fritsch , 891 F.2d667, 668 (8th Cir. 1989). We find no such error and conclude this issue lacks even arguable merit, as Chav ira has pointed to no facts entitling him to the reduction. Se e U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 3B1.2, comme nt. (n.3) (1995) (defining minor participant as "any participant who is les s culpable than most other participants, but whose role could not be described as minimal"); United States v. Thompson , 60 F.3d 514, 517 (8th Cir. 1995) (defendant bear s burden of proving entitlement to minor participant reduction). In fact, we believe the record indicates Chavira was deeply involved in the dru g distribut ion scheme. See United States v. West , 942 F.2d 528, 531 (8t h Cir. 1991).
We have reviewed the record in accordance with Penson v. Ohio , 48 8 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), and find no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Northern Minerals Inc.
(the "Company") for the period ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Damian
O'Hara, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: January 29, 2010               By: /s/ Damian O'Hara
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Damian O'Hara
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-2283
BRUCE M. MCLAUGHLIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, Secretary of Department of Veterans Affairs; JAMES D. SHELTON, Supervisor; TED IRBY, Team Coach; JERRY IRELAND, HRM; TANYA B. BURTON, Staff Attorney; DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. William L. Osteen, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-00203-WLO-WWD) Submitted: February 22, 2007 Decided: February 28, 2007 Before WILLIAMS, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bruce M. McLaughlin, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne P. Klauer, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Bruce M. McLaughlin appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment and dismissal of McLaughlin’s action alleging employment discrimination, retaliation, harassment, and ancillary claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McLaughlin v. Principi , No. 1:05-cv-00203-WLOWWD (M.D.N.C. Oct. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
August 3, 2015

Mr. Darian Williams

Southeast Enterprises, LLC

PO Box 227

Hazard, KY 41702

Dear Mr. Williams:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 5, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-1603), but 

we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply

with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, 

you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
MARVIN B. SEIDMAN, C.P.A.
                          Certified Public Accountants
                              8501 S.W. 29th Street
                              Miami, Florida 33155
                                 (305) 221-8271



September 11, 2003


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

                  I hereby consent to the use of the financial statements
prepared by Marvin B. Seidman, C.P.A. on behalf of Distribution Management
Services, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2002 in the
Company's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2003 to be filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                         Very truly yours,



                                         /s/ Marvin B. Seidman, C.P.A.
                                         -------------------------------
                                         MARVIN B. SEIDMAN, C.P.A.






<PAGE>
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-18-0000676 04-JAN-2019 08:41 AM
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1105

_____________________________

MIRELA HALILOVIC-SEVICK,

Appellant,

v.

PATRICK J. EVERS and 3M

COMPANY, a Florida profit 

corporation,

Appellees.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Brad Stetson, Judge.

January 30, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS, WETHERELL, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Michelline Haynes Ruth and Nelson E. Sierra of Law Offices of 

Ronald E. Sholes, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Michael S. O’Neal and Austin Brown of Fernandez Trial Lawyers, 

P.A., Jacksonville; and James F. Dunn, Eagan, Minnesota, for 

Appellees.
June 18, 2013

LT Simon Greene

611 Airport Road

Sitka, AK 99835

Dear LT Greene:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 61.157 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your April 5, 2013, exemption request into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2013-0325), but we are unable to process your request any further. The 

information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

Specifically, we require the following:

• The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. In addition, the FAA seeks to know if this request is being 

made on behalf of the United States Coast Guard or the Department of Defense.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send 

your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption.
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda D. Courtney

Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Toni A. Eldred, President and Chief Executive Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: March 15, 2010 /s/ Toni A. EldredToni A. Eldred
Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Mountain West Business Solutions, Inc.
(the Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended herein as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I. Matthew Milonas, Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,


that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fully presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations or the Company.





Date:June 4,
      2008
              By:
              /s/Matthew
      MilonasMatthew
      Milonas
                Chief
      Executive Officer
                Chief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 21.7Subsidiaries of Veridien Corporation A) Rost Inc. — incorporated in Florida (dormant)  B) Rost Medical Development, Inc. — incorporated in Delaware (dormant)  C) Marquit Manufacturing Specialties, Inc. — incorporated in Delaware (dormant)  D) Veridien.com Inc. — incorporated in Delaware (dormant)  E) Norpak (U.S.), Inc. — incorporated in Delaware  F) The SunSwipe Corporation, L.L.C. — incorporated in Delaware  G) Communications Gear, Inc. — incorporated in Delaware (dormant)The above-named subsidiaries which are operational conduct business solely under the listed names.
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. for the three months ended January 31, 2009. The undersigned certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. as of January 31, 2009. This Certification is executed as of  March 13, 2009. By:     /s/ Toni A. Eldred.                                              
----------------------------------------- 
Toni A. Eldred 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) By:     /s/ Toni A. Eldred.                                              
----------------------------------------- 
Toni A. Eldred
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# L_2011133EN.01000201.xml

| 20.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 133/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 133/2

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 483/2011

of 18 May 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Fagiolo Cuneo (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Fagiolo Cuneo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Fagiolo Cuneo’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 18 May 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 252, 18.9.2010, p. 12.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Fagiolo Cuneo (PGI)

---
#### Mayerhoff, Appellant, vs. Roxy Theatre Corporation, Respondent.

*January 7*—

February *15, 1946.*

*323For the appellant there were briefs by *Treis & Corrigan,*attorneys, and *Walter D. Corrigan, Sr.,*and *Thomas M. Cor-rigan*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Walter D. Corrigan, Sr.*

*George A. Bowman*of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Ros'enberry, C. J.

By ch. 399, Laws of 1935, sub. 3, sec. 28, ch. 549, Laws of 1909, as amended by ch. 255, Laws of 1933, was repealed and recreated to read as follows:

> “Upon an appeal from a judgment of the civil court to the circuit court, the circuit court may reverse, affirm or modify the judgment, and in case of a reversal or modification the circuit court may enter such judgment as may be proper. *Where, however, by reason of manifest prejudicial error in the trial of the action in the civil court any party thereto has not had a fair trial and where substantial justice cannot otherwise be done and the rights of the parties otherwise observed and protected, the judgment of the civil court shall be reversed,*
>       *324
>       *and the •'circuit court shall remit the case to the civil court for a new trial or further proceedings.”*

It was under this section that the circuit court entered the order reversing and remanding the judgment appealed from. That there is manifest error in the trial in the civil court and an entire failure to comply with the statute in regard to making findings can hardly be questionéd. There is a clear dispute in the evidence, and the contention of the appellant that only one inference can be drawn from the facts cannot be sustained. Under these facts it was the duty of the circuit court under the provisions of sub. 3 to remand the case for further hearing. This is not in a technical sense a new trial. The case was remanded to complete the trial.' The matter having been remanded to the civil court to enable it to complete the trial, the order is not a final order and for that reason "not appealable.

*By the Court.*— The appeal is dismissed.