alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6911

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CONNELLY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior

District Judge. (5:10-cr-00238-F-1)

Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 20, 2015

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher Michael Connelly, Appellant Pro Se. Shailika S. 

Kotiya, Jennifer E. Wells, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, 

Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Michael Connelly seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. 

The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that 

Connelly has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Leusink, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. O’Donnell and another, Defendants and Appellants: Spielmacher and another, Defendants and Respondents.

*October 3*

November 8, *1950.*

*573For the appellants there were briefs by *Toebaas, Hart, Kraege & Jackman*of Madison, and oral argument by *W. L. Jackman.*

For the respondent Gerrit J. Leusink there was a brief by *Jeffris, Mouat, Oestreich, Wood & Cunningham,*and oral argument by *Harry F. Knipp,*all of Janesville.

For the respondents Allen Spielmacher and Allstate Insurance Company there was a brief by *Garrigan, Keithley, O’Neal, Mills & Dobson*of Beloit, and oral argument by *Roger D. O’Neal.*

Hughes, J.

We are of the opinion that the trial court correctly held that the evidence sustained the verdict of the jury that defendant O’Donnell’s employee was guilty of causal negligence. As Crisman approached the intersection he was traveling forty miles per hour. When four hundred feet away he observed Spielmacher; he did not again look in that direction until it was too late to act. If he had made proper observation of the Spielmacher car as it approached the stop sign, he could have ascertained that it was not slowing down; and while he might not have been able to avoid the first collision, ordinary care would have required him to reduce his own speed so as to avoid becoming a menace to traffic approaching from the opposite direction.

The testimony that Spielmacher had knowledge of the defective condition of his brakes, although he said he never had experienced total failure before, presented a jury question of gross negligence. His plea of guilty, while it may not be conclusive proof of recklessness, is a matter for the jury to consider in connection with the explanation which he offered of his reasons for entering the plea. The trial court erred in failing to submit the question of gross negligence.

All parties concede that the plaintiff was not negligent. They raise no question that the damages awarded by the jury were excessive, so there appears to be no need for a new trial on the question of damages.

*574*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed and cause remanded with instructions to grant a new trial on all issues except the question of damages.
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION




The undersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K to which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Exchange Act. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), this certification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and (B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.




Date: March 16, 2011/s/ Thomas E. D’AmbraName:
Thomas E. D’Ambra, Ph.D.Title:
President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85008-85009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24718]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) 
will hold a public meeting via telephone conference line on Wednesday, 
November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Alec Johnston, Office of National 
Public Liaison, at (202) 317-4299, or send an email to 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#19696c7b75707a757078706a767759706b6a377e766f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8bfbfee9e7e2e8e7e2eae2f8e4e5cbe2f9f8a5ece4fd">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that a public meeting 
via conference call of the ETAAC will be held on Wednesday, November 
14, 2024, at 12:30 p.m. EDT. The purpose of the ETAAC is to provide 
continuing advice regarding the development and implementation of the 
IRS organizational strategy for electronic tax administration. ETAAC is 
an organized public forum for discussion of electronic tax 
administration issues such as prevention of identity theft and refund 
fraud. It supports the overriding goal that paperless filing should be 
the preferred and most convenient method of filing tax and information 
returns. ETAAC members convey the public's perceptions of IRS 
electronic tax administration activities, offer constructive 
observations about current or proposed policies, programs, and 
procedures, and suggest improvements. Please call or email Alec 
Johnston to confirm your attendance. Mr. Johnston can be reached at 
202-317-4299 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aefedbccc2c7cde2c7cfc7ddc1c0eec7dcdd80c9c1d8">[email protected]</a>. Should you wish the ETAAC to 
consider a written statement, please call 202-317-4299 or email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="beeecbdcd2d7ddf2d7dfd7cdd1d0fed7cccd90d9d1c8">[email protected]</a>.


[[Page 85009]]


    Dated: October 17, 2024.
John A. Lipold,
Designated Federal Official, Office of National Public Liaison, 
Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-24718 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

 Payroll Office Letter

 

Number: P-99-19 July 27, 1999

Subject: Child Support Enforcement Briefing

The purpose of this letter is to inform you of a briefing introducing new tools used for child

support enforcement in Federal agencies. We are hosting the briefing here at the Office of

Personnel Management (OPM) in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human

Services’ (HHS) Office of Child Support Enforcement. It is scheduled for Thursday,

August 5, 1999, from 9:30 – 12:00 noon, in OPM’s conference room 1350, at 1900 E Street,

NW, Washington, DC. 

As a member of the payroll community, you might consider attending the briefing to witness

the unveiling of the new Employers’ Desk Guide to Child Support. The Guide is a recently

created reference material that will be showcased and is available to order for use in your

office.

If you are interested in attending the briefing, please complete the attached Reservation Form

and fax to (202) 606-2091 before August 2, 1999, Attn: Iris Beale. For more information, you

may directly contact our Family-Friendly Workplace Advocacy Office staff here at OPM on

(202) 606-5520. 

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service

Attachments
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84910]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24684]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4830-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

Georgia; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated September 30, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued October 1, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Georgia is hereby amended to include the following 
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by 
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration 
of September 30, 2024.

    Atkinson, Bacon, Ben Hill, Berrien, Bulloch, Burke, Candler, 
Chatham, Clinch, Colquitt, Cook, Echols, Emanuel, Evans, Glascock, 
Irwin, Jeff Davis, Jenkins, Johnson, Lanier, Laurens, Lincoln, 
McDuffie, Montgomery, Screven, Telfair, Treutlen, Ware, Washington, 
and Wheeler Counties for Individual Assistance.
    Atkinson, Bacon, Ben Hill, Berrien, Bulloch, Burke, Candler, 
Chatham, Clinch, Colquitt, Cook, Echols, Emanuel, Evans, Glascock, 
Irwin, Jeff Davis, Jenkins, Johnson, Lanier, Laurens, Lincoln, 
McDuffie, Montgomery, Screven, Telfair, Treutlen, Ware, Washington, 
and Wheeler Counties for debris removal and emergency protective 
measures (Categories A and B), including direct federal assistance 
under the Public Assistance program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-24684 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
```
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ads In Motion, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended November 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Edward F. Myers III,
as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: 12/22/10                          By: /s/ Edward F. Myers III
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Edward F. Myers III
                                            Chief Executive Officer & Chief
                                            Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 21, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-40580

Summary Calendar

LONNIE GUNN, JR., 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus 

TOM MANNESS, Prosecuting Attorney; RUTH BOLES, S.O. 

Registration Clerk; AMY WOODS, Parole Officer; 

DR. UNKNOWN PARTY, District Attorney; LEONARD GIBLIN, Judge;

PAT KNAUTH; BRYAN LAINE,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:04-CV-215

--------------------

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Lonnie Gunn, Jr., Texas prisoner # 644474, filed a 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 complaint against several defendants whom he alleged

participated in his wrongful conviction for failure to register

as a sex offender. That conviction was overturned in a judgment

dated February 7, 2002. Gunn v. State, No. 13-01-242-CR, 2002 WL

189067, at *1 (Tex. App. Feb. 7, 2002). The defendants argued,

and the district court agreed, that Gunn’s complaint, filed in
No. 05-40580

-2-

April 2004, was untimely because his cause of action accrued on

the date his conviction was overturned. Gunn appeals the

dismissal of his complaint, and he moves for the appointment of

counsel and the entry of a money judgment in his favor.

Gunn argues that the two-year limitation period should have

been tolled from February 7, 2002, until June 10, 2002, when he

received a letter from appointed counsel informing him that his

conviction had been overturned. We will not consider this

argument, which is raised for the first time on appeal. 

See Leverette v. Louisville Ladder Co., 183 F.3d 339, 342 (5th

Cir. 1999).

Gunn has not shown that the district court erred in

dismissing his complaint as frivolous and for failure to state a

claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The appointment of counsel in

this civil case is not warranted. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691

F.2d 209, 212 (5th Cir. 1982). Gunn’s motions for the

appointment of counsel and his motion for the entry of a money

judgment in his favor are denied.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The

district court’s dismissal counts as a strike for purposes of 28

U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 388

(5th Cir. 1996). Gunn is cautioned that if he accumulates three

strikes, he may not proceed IFP in any civil action or appeal

filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless
No. 05-40580

-3-

he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See

1915(g).

AFFIRMED; ALL OUTSTANDING MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTION WARNING

ISSUED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 In connection with the Annual Report of Mediacom LLC (the Company) on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Rocco B. Commisso, Chief Executive Officer and Mark E. Stephan, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 March 30, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/Rocco B. CommissoRocco B. CommissoChief Executive OfficerMarch 30, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/Mark E. StephanMark E. StephanChief Financial Officer
 88
In-Person Attendees: The Energy Conservation Standards and Test Procedures for Commercial Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Water-Heating Equipment Meeting

Meeting Date: Friday, February 6, 2015

Name Title Organization Street City State Zip Phone Fax

Ames, Mark Manager of Federal 

Government Affairs

ASHRAE 1828 L Street N.W., Suite 

#810

Washington DC 20036 202-833-1830 202-833-0118

Armstrong, Ashley General Engineer U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585-0121 202-586-6590 202-586-4617

Brookman, Douglas Facilitator Public Solutions, Inc. 108 Newburg Avenue Baltimore MD 21228 410-719-0580 410-719-0581

Cymbalsky, John Supervisory Operations 

Research Analyst

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, SW

Washington DC 20585 202-287-1692 202-586-4617

Doppel, Paul L. Senior Director, Industry 

& Government Affairs

Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, 

Inc.

1340 Satellite Blvd. Suwanee GA 30034 678-275-8801 678-473-1217

Faltermeier, Sean N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 South Bedofrd St, Suite 

400

Burlington MA 01803 781-270-8419 N/A

Feinstein, Rachel Manager of Government 

Affairs

Hearth, Patio & Barbecue Association 

(HPBA)

1901 North Moore Street, 

Suite 600

Arlington VA 22209-1728 703-522-0086 x 

109

703-522-0177

Harrison, Glenn N/A DOJ Antitrust 430 5th Street Washington DC N/A 202-598-2494 N/A

Medepalli, Sarah A. Senior Associate ICF International 1725 Eye Street, NW,

Suite 1000

Washington DC 20006 202-862-1268 202-862-1144

Petrillo-Groh, Laura G. Senior Certification 

Engineer

Air-Conditioning, Heating, and 

Refrigeration Institute (AHRI)

2111 Wilson Boulevard, 

Suite 500

Arlington VA 22201-3001 703-600-0335 703-552-1942

Roy, Aniruddh N/A Goodman Manufacturing Company, 

L.P.

10787 Clay Road Houston TX 77041 703-657-0398 N/A

Stas, Eric A. Attorney-Advisor

(General)

U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) 1000 Independence 

Avenue, S.W.

Washington DC 20585 202-586-5827 202-586-4116

Whitwell, Robert Manager, Commercial 

Unitary Engineering

Carrier Corporation Carrier Parkway, PO Box 

4804

Syracuse NY 13221-4808 315-432-6825 860-998-2475

Xu, Xing N/A Navigant Consulting, Inc. 1200 19th Street NW, Suite 

700

Washington DC 20036 202-973-4512 202-973-2401
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

THOMAS BYRD , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 19

- 1232

[ February 18, 2021 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Jeffrey Colbath , Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2012

- CF

- 009385

- BXXX

- MB

.
Thomas J. Butler of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami Beach, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez

Orosa, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Be ach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

C IKLIN , C ONNER and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Mordechai Shalev, Adv.,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:




1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of R.V.B. Holdings Ltd. (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: May 14, 2015




By: /s/Mordechai Shalev, Adv.

Name:  Mordechai Shalev, Adv.

Title:    Temporary Liquidator

(Executive Principal Officer and Executive Financial Officer)
---

---

EXHIBIT 15.4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by
reference into the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Registration Nos. 333-110681, 333-125439 and 333-125440) and the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos.
333-14238, 333-12146, 333-09840, 333-109874 and 333-118930) of Retalix Ltd. (the
Company) of our report dated January 23, 2005 on the financial statements of
Cell-Time, Ltd., as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and for the year ended December 31, 2004
and the period from March 25, 2003 to December 31, 2003, which appears in this Amendment
No. 1 to Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F/A as of and for the year ending
December 31, 2004.

Tel- Aviv, Israel
July 21, 2006
/s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
A Member of Ernst & Young Global



---

---