alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 31

To amend title 1, United States Code, to clarify the effect and application

of legislation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 19, 1999

Mr. THURMOND introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend title 1, United States Code, to clarify the effect

and application of legislation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION RELATING TO RET4 ROACTIVE APPLICATION OF STATUTES AND

5 THE CREATION OF PRIVATE CLAIMS AND

6 CAUSES OF ACTION.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 1 of title 1, United

8 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the follow9 ing:
2

•S 31 IS

1 ‘‘§ 8. Rules for determining the retroactive effect of

2 legislation and the creation of private

3 claims and causes of action

4 ‘‘(a) Unless a provision included in the Act expressly

5 specifies otherwise, any Act of Congress enacted after the

6 effective date of this section shall—

7 ‘‘(1) be prospective in application only; and

8 ‘‘(2) not create a private claim or cause of ac9 tion.

10 ‘‘(b) In applying subsection (a)(1), a court shall de11 termine the relevant retroactivity event in an Act of Con12 gress (if such event is not specified in such Act) for pur13 poses of determining if the Act—

14 ‘‘(1) is prospective in application only; or

15 ‘‘(2) affects conduct that occurred before the ef16 fective date of the Act.’’.

17 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—

18 The table of sections for chapter 1 of title 1, United States

19 Code, is amended by adding after the item relating to sec20 tion 7 the following:

‘‘8. Rules for determining the retroactive effect of legislation and the creation

of private claims and causes of action.’’.

Æ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. TIMOTHY WILLIAMS, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 143 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 10th day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 31.2


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Mark
R. Stauffer, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orion Marine Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) 
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) 
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






By:
            /s/
      Mark R. StaufferMay
      8, 2008
            Mark
      R. StaufferExecutive
      Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 7, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
379 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-38, K2025-37.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24055 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT
        32.1**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO**
 **18
        U.S.C. SECTION 1350**
 **AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 
 The
        undersigned, Benny Gaber, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
        of
        Cardio Vascular Medical Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards
        set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
        to
        Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, this
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30,
        2008
        fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
        presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
        operations of the Company.
  Date:
        July 25, 2008
 By:
                /s/ Benny GaberName:
                Benny GaberTitle:
                President, Chief Executive Officer and Director(Principal
                    Executive Officer)
 A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
        and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
  13
**Exhibit 10.10**

**STRATA BANK**

STRATA BANK EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN 

AMENDMENT EFFECTIVE MAY 15, 2007 

WHEREAS,Strata Bank, a corporation organized under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts (the “Bank”) established the Strata Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan (the “ESOP”), effective as of November 1, 1997;and 

WHEREAS, under Section 13.3 of the ESOP, the Bank has reserved the right to amend the ESOP at any time and for any reason; and

WHEREAS, the Bank also maintains a profit-sharing plan intended to satisfy the qualification requirements of Section 401(a) of theInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), which includes a cash-or-deferred arrangement within the meaning of Section 401(k) of the Code (the “401(k) Plan”); and 

WHEREAS, the Bank most recently amended the ESOP by adoption, effective March 28, 2005, of the First Amendment; and 

WHEREAS, the Bank desires to amend the ESOP to merge the ESOP with and into the 401(k) Plan, effective June 29, 2007. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows, effective May 15, 2007 except as otherwise indicated below: 

1. Section 1 is amended by inserting immediately after subsection 1.6 the following new subsection: 

“1.7 Merger of Plan. Effective June 29, 2007, the Plan was merged with and into the SBERA 401(k) Plan as adopted byStrata Bank. In connection with such merger, (i) no Participant’s or Beneficiary’s proportionate interest in the Trust Fund was reduced, (ii) no benefit provided any Participant prior to June 29, 2007 was reduced orrestricted, either directly or indirectly, and (iii) no portion of the Trust Fund shall be diverted to purposes other than the exclusive benefit of the Participants and their Beneficiaries prior to the satisfaction of all liabilities under thePlan. In the event of the termination of the SBERA 401(k) Plan as adopted by Strata Bank (or its successor plan or the surviving plan immediately following a transfer, merger, or consolidation of such 401(k) plan), each Participant and Beneficiaryshall be entitled to a benefit not less than the benefit he or she would have been entitled to if the plan in which he or she was previously a participant or 

beneficiary had terminated immediately prior to such transfer, merger, or consolidation.” 

2. Section 9 is amended by inserting immediately after subsection 9.4 the following new subsection: 

“9.4A Full Vesting for Active Participants Upon Plan Merger. Notwithstanding Section 9.1, a Participant’s interestin his Account shall fully vest on May 15, 2007 (if not fully vested prior thereto) in connection with the merger of the Plan with and into the SBERA 401(k) Plan as adopted by Strata Bank in accordance with Section 1.7, provided that onMay 15, 2007, the Participant is actively employed by the Company; or absent on an approved leave, including without limitation, approved vacation, medical, military or personal leave.” 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Strata Bank has caused this instrument to be executed as of May 15, 2007 by its duly authorized officer. 

STRATA BANK 

By:  /s/ Dana S. Philbrook

        Its Chief FinancialOfficer 

 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2212

CHARLES M. PERSSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CREDIT BUREAU OF SOUTHERN VIRGINIA,

INCORPORATED,

Defendant - Appellee,

and

AMERICREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES, INCORPORATED;

REGIONAL ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION; VICTORY

NISSAN OF RICHMOND, INCORPORATED,

Parties in Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior

District Judge. (MC-02-8-3)

Submitted: November 21, 2002 Decided: November 27, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles M. Persson, Appellant Pro Se.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Charles Persson appeals from orders of the District Court for

the Eastern District of Virginia denying Persson’s requests for the

issuance of a subpoena relating to a complaint he filed in the

District Court for the Western District of Virginia. He also asks

this court to direct the Western District to hold his case in

abeyance pending resolution of this appeal. Our review of the

record and the pertinent district court dockets reveals that

Persson’s underlying complaint was dismissed with prejudice in the

Western District following a settlement reached by the parties.

This action renders Persson’s claim before this court no longer

justiciable. Accordingly, we deny Persson’s motion to direct that

his case be held in abeyance, and we dismiss the appeal as moot.

See Leonard v. Hammond, 804 F.2d 838, 842 (4th Cir. 1986). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2011 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


   /s/ T J Jesky
----------------------------------
       T J Jesky
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer



Date  June 14, 2011
      -------------

<PAGE>
-  View a hi-res version of this image                        HFIR/REDC Site                    Read more 
                          -  View a hi-res version of this image                        High Flux Isotope Reactor                    Read more 
                          -  View a hi-res version of this image                        REDC Control Room                    Read more 
                          -  View a hi-res version of this image                        REDC Control Room                    Read more 
                          -  View a hi-res version of this image                        TAL hot cell in REDC                    Read more 
                          -  View a hi-res version of this image                        TAL Shielded Glovebox Laboratories                    Read more 
                          -  View a hi-res version of this image                        TAL Shielded Glovebox Laboratories                    Read more 
                          -  View a hi-res version of this image                        U-233 Recovery Glovebox Chain                    Read more 

# Transuranium Analytical Laboratory -- Facilities

## Transuranium Analytical Laboratory Facilities

The Radiochemical Engineering Development Center (REDC) at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) is the production, storage, and distribution center for the heavy-element research program of the U.S. Department of Energy. The REDC and the neighboring High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) were built to produce transuranium elements for use in national and international research programs and since 1966 has been the main center of production for transcurium elements in the United States.  

The TAL’s unique combination of infrastructure and expertise allows its members to accommodate the demands of supporting multidisciplinary projects like ORNL’s Pu-238 Production Program.  The TAL consists of a series of glovebox laboratories and hot cells for handling and analysis of high-level radioactive materials.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-40454 Summary Calendar

JOSEPH G. STRAWBRIDGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus SHANNON L. McDOW, Correctional Officer, Coffield Unit Individually and in official capacity; SCOTT L. HOLLEY, Correctional Officer, Coffield Unit Individually and in official capacity; DAVID S. KASSAW, Correctional Officer, Coffield Unit Individually and in official capacity, Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 6:97-CV-364

- - - - - - - - - - April 28, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Joseph G. Strawbridge, Texas prisoner no. 529740, appeals the magistrate judge’s entry of summary judgment in favor of Defendants Scott L. Holley and David S. Kassaw and the magistrate judge’s dismissal, as frivolous, of his claims against Defendant Shannon L. McDow.No. 98-40454 -2- In deciding Strawbridge’s excessive force claim, the magistrate judge relied upon our decision in Siglar v. Hightower , 112 F.3d 191 (5th Cir. 1997), to find that Strawbridge’s injuries were de minimis and thus could not form the basis of a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights claim. The magistrate judge did not have the benefit of our recent decision in Gomez v. Chandler , 163 F.3d 921 (5th Cir. 1999), in which we elaborated upon the definition of “de minimis” in a factual context more similar to the instant case than Siglar . The magistrate judge’s opinion regarding Strawbridge’s excessive force claim is thus VACATED; the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Gomez
. The magistrate judge’s resolution of Strawbridge’s claims that (1) he was subjected to an unfair disciplinary proceeding, resulting in a lengthier prison term and undesirable prison housing, and (2) that he was the victim of retaliation is AFFIRMED for essentially the same reasons cited by the magistrate judge. See Strawbridge v. McDow , 6:97-CV-364 (E.D. Tex., March 11, 1998). Strawbridge’s request for appointment of counsel is
DENIED AS MOOT. AFFIRMED IN PART; VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Hersha Hospitality Trust (the “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jay H. Shah, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 March 3, 2011
/s/ Jay H. ShahJay H. ShahChief Executive Officer
#### State ex rel. Martin, Attorney General, Appellant, vs. Seroogy, Respondent.

*March 14*—

April *29, 1946.*

For the appellant there were briefs by *tht Attorney General, James Ward Rector,*deputy attorney general, *W. E. Torkel-son,*assistant attorney general, and *J. Norman Basten,*district attorney of Brown county, and oral argument by *Mr. Rector.*

*Raymond E. Evrard*of Green Bay, for. the respondent.

A brief was filed by *Paul E. Jorgensen*of Racine, attorney for the Tavern League of Wisconsin, Inc., as *amicus enrice.*

A brief was also filed by *Clarence Simon,*district attorney of Taylor county, as *amicus curies.*

Barlow, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State ex rel. Martin v. Barrett, ante,*p. 621, 22 N. W. (2d) 663, decided herewith, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the. Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with instructions to enter judgment enjoining defendant from selling, dealing, or trafficking in intoxicating liquor, as demanded in the complaint.

Rector, J., took no part.
SERVED: APRIL 9, 2012 

OEFARTMEMTOF 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. ,!'J'TMrpnlATiON 

OFFICE OF ITEARINGS '''-^' O^'ITRAnOMS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

J ii^i?/\PR-q P2:3 i 

IN TFTE MATTER OF 

WESTOVER CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2012-0200 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2010WP700145) has been assigned 

to Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other 

communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing 

Docket, and the other persons on the attached Service List. 

Ronnie A. Yo 

Chief Administrative/Ldw Judge 

Attachment - Service List 
FDMS No. FAA-2012-0200 

(Civil Penally Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk. AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2WI000' 

ONE COPY 

Howard Bittman, Respondent's Counsel 

P.O. Box 4370 

113 Spaice Street 

Boulder, CO 80306 

TEL: 303-444-8349 

FAX: 303-444-1089 

Courtney Adolph, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of Regional Counsel 

Western-Pacific Region, AWP-7.4 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 92007 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7128 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Adminisfraiive Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.' (E11 -310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

202-366-5121 Staff Assistant/Paralegal 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For ser\'ice in person or by expedited courier, use llie foilowing address: Federal 

Aviation Adniinislration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wrighl Building—Suite 2Win00, Washington. 

DC 20591, Auention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC^30. 

- 2 -
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

       The undersigned, James A. Todd, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of AF Bankshares, Inc. (the "Company").

       This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2002 (the "Report").

       By execution of this statement, I certify that:

              A)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                     U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

              B)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                     all material respects, the financial condition and results
                     of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
                     periods covered by the Report.

       This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that
this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended.


September 30, 2002                                /s/ James A. Todd
----------------------------                      ------------------------------
Dated                                             James A. Todd