alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Shaske and another, Plaintiffs and Respondents, vs. Hron (Elroy), Defendant: Hron (Kevin), by Guardian *ad litem,*Defendant and Appellant.

*March 3*

April *6, 1954.*

*385For the appellant there was a brief by *Byrne, Bubols & Spanagel*of Appleton, and oral argument by *Edward J. Byrne.*

For the respondents the cause was submitted on the brief of *Bartelt & Bartelt*of Kewaskum, attorneys, and *Henry A. Detling*of Sheboygan of counsel.

Fairchild, C. J.

The question presented on this appeal is whether a boy four years, eight months old, of normal intelligence for his age, is, as a matter of law, incapable of negligence. There is a dividing line in child development of intelligence and aptitude below which a child is not expected to conform to the standard of behavior reasonably expected of an older person, and because of this lack of development the acts of the child are to be judged by a standard of behavior based on what may be reasonably expected from such a child. The caution required of a child depends on the maturity and capacity of the child. If he is “so young as to be manifestly incapable of exercising any of those qualities of attention, intelligence, and judgment which are necessary to enable him to perceive a risk and to realize its unreasonable character,” he is generally held incapable of negligence. Restatement, 2 Torts, p. 743, sec. 283, comment *e.*

There is an age of a child at which general experience declares him to be *non sui juris,*and it has been generally *386considered that a child under five and one-half years of age is incapable of either contributory or primary negligence. Under the circumstances disclosed by the evidence which the record contains, the child, Kevin Hron, must be held to be free from negligence arising out of an act resulting in damage to a child with whom he was playing. It is considered that the motion for summary judgment in favor of the child dismissing the complaint against him should be granted.

In *Ruka v. Zierer,*195 Wis. 285, 293, 218 N. W. 358, the court made the following statement: “The boy was five years and three months of age. While it is held in a few jurisdictions that a child of that age is capable of contributory negligence, the overwhelming weight of authority is to the effect that a child of that age is conclusively presumed to be incapable of contributory negligence. See Note in L. R. A. 1917F, on page 57. This rule meets with our entire approval, especially under the facts and circumstances of this case.”

While *Ruka v. Zierer, supra,*deals with contributory negligence as distinguishable from primary negligence, the authorities generally do not distinguish between the two.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed. Cause remanded with directions to enter judgment in favor of Kevin Hron, dismissing the complaint as to him.
Exhibit 10.3

                     FIRST AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT


        THIS FIRST  AMENDMENT  TO  EMPLOYMENT  CONTRACT is made and entered into
this 3rd day of April, 2000, by and between M.G.A., INC., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), and H. HARRISON PARRISH (the "Employee").

                              W I T N E S S E T H:

        WHEREAS,  the Company and Employee entered into that certain  Employment
Contract, dated June 9, 1994 (the "Agreement"),  providing for the employment of
Employee as President of the Company; and

        WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Company has approved an amendment
to the  Agreement to increase the base annual salary  payable to Employee  under
the Agreement;

        NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration,  the parties hereby
agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

        1.  Paragraph 4.1 of ARTICLE IV of the  Agreement is hereby  removed and
deleted in its  entirety,  and a new Paragraph 4.1 of ARTICLE IV is hereby added
in its place and stead as follows:

               "4.1 For the  services to be rendered by Employee in his capacity
        hereunder,  or any other duty  assigned to him by the Board of Directors
        of the Company,  the Company agrees to pay Employee a base annual salary
        of Four Hundred  Thousand  and No/100  Dollars  ($400,000.00)  per year,
        subject to such increases as the Board of Directors (or the Compensation
        Committee  of the  Board  of  Directors)  in its sole  discretion  deems
        appropriate  in  accordance  with  the  Company's  customary  procedures
        regarding  the  salaries  of its  executive  officers.  Said base annual
        salary  shall be  payable in  successive  biweekly  payments  due on the
        normal payroll payment days of each month in equal amounts."

        2. This amendment shall be effective as of April 3, 2000.

        3. In all other respects, the Agreement is hereby ratified and affirmed.

        IN  WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the  parties  hereto  have  executed  this  First
Amendment to Employment Contract on the day and year first above written.


ATTEST:                                     M.G.A., INC.

/s/ Leah C. Brook                           By: /s/ S. Page Todd
-------------------------                       ----------------------
Assistant Secretary                             Senior Vice President



/s/ Martha M. Compton                       /s/  H. Harrison Parrish
------------------------                    ------------------------
Witness                                     H. Harrison Parrish
# Službeni list C 178/2016

| | ISSN 1977-1088 |
| --- | --- |
| Službeni list
  Europske unije | C 178 |
| | |
| Hrvatsko izdanje | Informacije i objave | Svezak 59.18. svibnja 2016. |

ISSN 1977-1088

Službeni list

Europske unije

C 178

Hrvatsko izdanje

Informacije i objave

Svezak 59.18. svibnja 2016.

---

| Obavijest br. | Sadržaj | Stranica |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | Ispravci |
| 2016/C 178/01 | Ispravak Stajališta Vijeća (EU) br. 1/2016 u prvom čitanju s ciljem donošenja Uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o Agenciji Europske unije za željeznice i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EZ) br. 881/2004 — Usvojeno od strane Vijeća 10. prosinca 2015.( SL C 56, 12.2.2016. ) | 1 |

Obavijest br.

Sadržaj

Stranica

Ispravci

2016/C 178/01

Ispravak Stajališta Vijeća (EU) br. 1/2016 u prvom čitanju s ciljem donošenja Uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o Agenciji Europske unije za željeznice i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EZ) br. 881/2004 — Usvojeno od strane Vijeća 10. prosinca 2015.( SL C 56, 12.2.2016. )

( SL C 56, 12.2.2016. )

1

---

| HR | |
| --- | --- |

HR

---

Ispravci

| 18.5.2016 | HR | Službeni list Europske unije | C 178/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.5.2016

HR

Službeni list Europske unije

C 178/1

---

Ispravak Stajališta Vijeća (EU) br. 1/2016 u prvom čitanju s ciljem donošenja Uredbe Europskog parlamenta i Vijeća o Agenciji Europske unije za željeznice i stavljanju izvan snage Uredbe (EZ) br. 881/2004 — Usvojeno od strane Vijeća 10. prosinca 2015.

(
  Službeni list Europske unije C 56 od 12. veljače 2016.
  )

(2016/C 178/01)

Na stranici 39., u članku 65. stavku 10.:

umjesto:

„10.   Europski parlament na preporuku Vijeća koje odlučuje kvalificiranom većinom prije 30. travnja godine N + 2 daje razrješnicu izvršnom direktoru za izvršenje proračuna za godinu N.”;

treba stajati:

„10.   Europski parlament na preporuku Vijeća koje odlučuje kvalificiranom većinom prije 15. svibnja godine N + 2 daje razrješnicu izvršnom direktoru za izvršenje proračuna za godinu N.”.

---
STATE OF DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL

OFFICE OF T H E

SECRETARY

Mr. Donald S. Welsh (3RAOO) Regional Adm in istrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, PA 19103-2029
Dear Mr. Welsh: 89 KINGS HIGHWAY DOVER , D ELAWARE 19901 September 25, 2008 PHONE: (302) 739-9000 FAX: (302) 739-6242

I am pleased to submit the enclo sed State of Delaware Visibility State Implementation Plan (SIP). The effective date ofthe SIP is September 25,2008

. This plan encompasses 1) monitoring strategie s for evaluating vi s ibility impacts, 2) baseline s and trends, 3) long-tenn strategies (LTS), 4) how Delaware meet s its fair share of the "rea so nable progre ss go al s" (RPG) towards reducing visibility impairment in Class I areas, and 5) Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART). This plan demonstrates that Delaware has met its BAR T, RPG and LTS obligation s for 2018 vi s ibility impairment. The requirements of the CAA Section 110(a)(2)(A) have been met through the normal public hearing proces s established by th e State of D e laware with proper notification (30 day s ) prior to th e convening of the public hearing , as well as the requi site "60-day Review " by federal land manage rs . A public hearing was held on September 23, 2008. Attachments A and B are copies of affidavits as proof of proper notification. It is the position of the State of Delaware that all minimum requirements set forth in the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments have been met. We look forward to continuing the cooperative effort between D e laware and EPA in this important work. A s always, fe el free to contact me or Ali Mirzakhalili, Administrator, (302) 739-9402, if you have any que stions concerning the enclosed document s .

Enclosures ec: Judy Katz , EPA wle nel. James Werner, Director, DA WM Ali Mirzakhalili 

# d:cA /V

/ John A. Hughes 

### U Secretary
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ckruch, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Jan E. Chanson, Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|    |                                                                                                                      
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 15, 2008


By:


/s/ Jan E. ChasonJan E. Chason
Executive Vice President
& Chief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-KSB pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form with the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 10.1.1

Award Agreement  under the  Advanstar Holdings Corp.  2000 Management Incentive Plan

Date of Grant:

January , 2001Name of Optionee:Number of Shares
    Super Performance Vesting:

SharesExercise Price:

$./ShareExpiration Date:

January , 2011


Advanstar
Holdings Corp. (formerly known as Jetman Acquisition Corp), a Delaware corporation (the "Company"), hereby grants to the
above-named optionee (the "Optionee") a super performance vesting option (the "Super Performance Vesting
Option", the "Options") to purchase from the Company, for the price per share set forth above, the number of shares of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share
(the "Shares"), of the Company set forth above pursuant to the Advanstar Holdings Corp. 2000 Management Incentive Plan (the
"Plan"). The Options are not intended to be treated as incentive stock options under the Code.

Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as in the Plan. The terms and conditions of the Option granted hereby, to the extent not controlled by the
terms and conditions contained in the Plan, are as follows:



---





2

---





3

---





4

---





5

---





6

---





7

---





8

---



IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

|                         |  |           |  | 
|------------------------ |  | --------- |  | 
|ADVANSTAR HOLDINGS CORP. |  |           |  | 
|                         |  | By:       |  | 
|                         |  |           |  | 
|                         |  | Name:    
|                         |  | Title:   
|                         |  | OPTIONEE:
|                         |  |          
|                         |  | Name:    
|                         |  | Address: 

9

---



QuickLinks
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

129163 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. THOMAS L. ZUDER, Deceased, by KRISTAL Stephen J. Markman, LITTLE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 129163 COA: 259733 WCAC: 03-000233 TAILORED BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., PIONEER, INC., and ACCIDENT FUND INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appe al the June 15, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REMAND th is case to the Court of Appeals for consideration as on leave granted.

t0125 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 31, 2006

Clerk
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 4.4

                             COMPENSATION AGREEMENT

      This Compensation Agreement is entered into by and between Internet Law
Library, Inc. and James W. Christian as of the date set forth below.

      In consideration for legal services already rendered and satisfactorily
completed and advisory and consulting services, James W. Christian, a natural
person residing in the State of Texas ("Consultant"), agrees to accept 1,000,000
shares of Internet Law Library common stock under the following conditions:

1.    Internet Law Library will register the shares by filing an S-8 registering
      them as compensation for the legal, advisory and consulting services of
      James W. Christian.

2.    James W. Christian agrees to sell no more than 10% of the daily volume on
      any given day and further agrees never to sell shares on a down tick.

3.    James W. Christian releases Internet Law Library from the $244,000 in fees
      due for these services.

Both parties agree and acknowledge that Consultant performed bona fide services,
and that such services were not in connection with the offer or sale of
securities in a capital-raising transaction, and do not directly or indirectly
promote or maintain a market for Internet Law Library's securities.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been entered into to be effective
      as of the 4th day of October 2001.




James W. Christian                              Internet Law Library, Inc.

/s/ JAMES W. CHRISTIAN                              /s/ HUNTER M.A. CARR
____________________________                    By______________________________
                                                Hunter M.A. Carr
                                                Chairman and CEO
Exhibit 32





Section 1350 Certifications




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Shearson American REIT, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:




To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K (Amendment No. 2) of the Company for  the period ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  April 1, 2011




/s/ John Williams


John Williams


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated:  April 1, 2011





/s/ John D. Glassgow


John D. Glassgow


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameriwest Minerals Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William J. Muran, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ William J. Muran
-------------------------------------------------
William J. Muran
Chief Executive Officer & Chief Financial Officer
April 12, 2010


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

JS/Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PHINEAS CARLETTA BOLDEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF; et

al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-55808

D.C. No. 2:06-cv-07729-AG-AJW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Andrew J. Guilford, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted January 11, 2010** 

Before: BEEZER, TROTT, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Phineas Carletta Bolden appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment

dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

FILED

JAN 22 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
JS/Research 2 08-55808

37(b) for failure to comply with a discovery order compelling her deposition. We

have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion, 

Malone v. U.S. Postal Serv., 833 F.2d 128, 130 (9th Cir. 1987), and we affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by dismissing the action after

finding that Bolden willfully failed to appear at her deposition despite being

ordered to do so and warned that noncompliance could result in dismissal. See

Hyde & Drath v. Baker, 24 F.3d 1162, 1166-67 (9th Cir. 1994) (setting forth

factors that a district court must consider before dismissing an action for failure to

comply with a discovery order, and explaining that the district court has wide

discretion in determining the location of depositions).

Bolden’s remaining contentions are unavailing.

AFFIRMED.
-82 -80 -78 -76 -74

 38

 40

 42

▲★

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲

▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/07

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 07 Jul 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.81 N 76.74 W Meters AGL

■ ★

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

● ●

●

●
Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2006 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                         |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



16
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cardo Medical, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarterly period
ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Derrick Romine, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant
to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and

2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



| | /s/ Derrick Romine
                      Derrick RomineChief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:  August 12, 2010

---
# L_2015191DE.01000901.xml

| 17.7.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 191/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 191/9

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 70/2012 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die statistische Erfassung des Güterkraftverkehrs

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 32 vom 3. Februar 2012
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 32 vom 3. Februar 2012

Seite 15 Anhang VII, Tabelle für die Ländercodes, Punkt a), Eintrag für Griechenland, Spalte 2 „Code“:

anstatt:

„GR“

muss es heißen:

„EL“.

---