alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Charles Johnson, Appellee, v. J. C. Hollis et al., Appellees; Clarence Swisher, Appellant.

April 3, 1928.

*Genung & Genung*and *Orr & Anderson,*for appellant.

*B. J. Swanson,*for plaintiff, appellee.

Evans, J.

— Swisher pleaded no other defense to the note than that he was legally released therefrom by the failure of the plaintiff to sue Hollis after oral notice to him by Swisher.

*966*965Section 9457, Code of 1924, provides a method whereby a *966surety may require a suit to be brought against the principal maker, and whereby he may be released if the holder of the note refuses to follow the procedure pointed out therein. Under this section, it was requisite that Swisher, in order to work his release, should give notice ~n writiiig. Swisher gave notice orally, and not otherwise. An oral notice does not meet the requisites of the statute. The defense, thei'efore, was not valid.

It is urged, however, by Swisher that the extension of the note worked a release of the surety. It is not cofltended. that any formal written extension was executed by the plaintiff, but that he orally consented to let the note run, upon payment of interest. Whether this constituted a valid and enforcible extension of the note, we need not determine. The note by its express terms contained the consent of all parties thereto to all extensions which might be made. This defense, therefore, wa~ not available.

In 1the course of the trial, Swisher filed an amended answer, purporting to set up a waiver of the requisite of the statute that the notice be in writing. The motion of plaintiff to strike such answer on various grounds, including the lateness of the filing, was sustained by the court. No error is assigned upon this ruling, although some complaint thereof is made in arguthent. Nothing is disclosed in the record as showing an abuse of discretion by the court. Nor, indeed, were ~the facts set up in such amended answer sufficient to constitute a waiver. Nor were they sufficient to constitute an estoppel, as claimed by appellant in his argument, though he did not, in fact, purport to plead an estoppel, nor to predicate ai~y error on the ruling.

We find no valid ground for reversal of the judgment below. The judgment is, accordingly,-Affirmcd.

All the justices concur.
Exhibit 32





Section 1350 Certifications





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of Shearson American REIT, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the Company), hereby certify that:





To my knowledge, the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: August 22, 2013
/s/ John WilliamsJOHN WILLIAMS

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

(Principal Executive Officer)




Date: August 22, 2013
/s/ John WilliamsJOHN WILLIAMS

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAREEM MOSLEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 50 EM 2021

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 19 th day of November , 2021, the Petition for Leave to File Petition

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is ORDERED to file the

already

- prepared Petition for Allowance of Appeal within five days.
#### Gateway City Transfer Company, Inc., Appellant, vs. Public Service Commission, Respondent.

*June 8*

July *1, 1948.*

*231*Philip H. Porter*of Madison, and *Daniel PL. Grady*of Portage, for the appellant.

*Earl J. Cooper*and *R. W. Peterson,*both of Madison, and *Cornelius T. Young*of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

Per Curiam.

While Rule 1 (11) of the Rules of Practice requires that bond or undertaking on appeal be returned to this court as part of the record there is no such requirement as to the deposit of cash or bonds in lieu of undertaking or bond. It was, therefore, not necessary for the clerk of the circuit court to make return to this court of the cash deposited in lieu of the undertaking.

Leave is granted on the authority of *Wenzel & Henoch Construction Co. v. Wauwatosa*(1937), 226 Wis. 10, 16, 275 N. W. 552, and the cases therein cited. As was said in that case, referring to some prior decisions:

> “If these decisions imply that this court may not under sec. 274.32, Stats., permit an appeal to be ‘perfected’ after the time for appeal has expired when the only act wanting in that respect is the service of a copy of the appeal bond on the respondent, they are erroneous in that respect, and so far as they seem to so imply they are overruled.”

Counsel for defendant endeavored to distinguish the *Wenzel & Henoch Construction Co. v. Wauwatosa Case, supra,*on the ground that in that case there were irregularities in papers and in the service thereof, therefore relief could be granted, but the court cannot give relief in case of omissions or fill a vacuum created by appellant. This coiitention cannot be sustained. „ The court can certainly do it if it has jurisdiction. When a proper notice of appeal is served and filed within the statutory time the court acquires jurisdiction. Other nec*232essary steps are supplementary thereto. The question then is, -Are there sufficient grounds for excusing the irregularity complained of ? The court will not extend the time or allow perfection of the record in every case. *Pick v. Pick*(1944), 245 Wis. 496, 15 N. W. (2d) 807. It is considered that the excuse in this case is sufficient, no inconvenience or damage having resulted to the opposite party and there being every evidence of good faith to take an appeal. Therefore,

It is ordered that the request of the appellant for leave to file the deposit and notice thereof as of May 21, 1948, be and the same is hereby granted.

It is further ordered that the papers certified to this court by supplementary return be, and they are hereby made, a part of the records in this court, and the appeal is deemed perfected as of May 21,1948, the plaintiff to pay ten dollars costs of motion forthwith.
**LIST      OF SUBSIDIARIES**

| Subsidiary                                              |   | Jurisdiction                of Incorporation or Organization |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                    |   |                                                         |
| Clark                Consulting, Inc.                   |   | Delaware                                                     |
| Clark                Reinsurance Company Limited        |   | Cayman                Islands                                |
| Clark/Bardes                of Hawaii, LLC              |   | Hawaii                                                       |
| Clark                Securities, Inc.                   |   | California                                                   |
| Clark/Bardes                of Bermuda, Ltd.            |   | Bermuda                                                      |
| CRG                Insurance Agency, Inc.               |   | California                                                   |
| CBC                Insurance Revenue Securitization LLC |   | Delaware                                                     |
| COLI                Insurance Agency, Inc.              |   | California                                                   |
| CRG                Fiduciary Services, Inc.             |   | California                                                   |
| ECB                Insurance Agency, Inc.               |   | California                                                   |
| Executive                Benefit Services, Inc.         |   | California                                                   |
| Clark                Strategic Advisors, Inc.           |   | Delaware                                                     |
| Medex,                Inc.                              |   | Texas                                                        |
| Argos                Advantage, Inc.                    |   | Texas                                                        |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1385

MAI CHAPPEL,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

CHRISTINA COOPOCK, Executive Mortgage Specialist of Wells 

Fargo Bank,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District 

Judge. (3:13-cv-00084-JRS)

Submitted: August 6, 2013 Decided: August 14, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mai Chappel, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Mai Chappel appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) for 

failure to comply with a court order. We have reviewed the 

record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for 

the reasons stated by the district court. Chappel v. Coopock, 

No. 3:13-cv-00084-JRS (E.D. Va. Mar. 5, 2013). We dispense with 

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

EASTERN DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

I. DEAN FULTON, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 220 EAL 2016 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 25th day of October, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
<PAGE>

EX-3.3  CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION

                           CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT TO
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                          FOR NEVADA PROFIT CORPORATION
          (Pursuant to NRS 78.385 and 78.390 - After Issuance of Stock)

1. Name of corporation: Everlert, Inc.

2. The articles have been amended as follows (provide article numbers, if
available):

Article 4: The aggregate number of shares which the corporation shall have the
authority to issue shall consist of 800,000,000 shares of Common Stock having a
$.001 par value. The Common Stock of the Company may be issued from time to time
without prior approval by the stockholders. The Common Stock may be issued for
such consideration as may be fixed from time to time by the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors may issue such shares of Common Stock and/or Preferred
Stock in one or more series, with such voting powers, designations, preferences
and rights or qualifications, limitations, or restrictions thereof as shall be
stated in the resolution or resolutions.

3. The vote by which the stockholders holding shares in the corporation
entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power, or such
greater proportion of the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote
by classes or series, or as may be required by the provisions of the articles of
incorporation have voted in favor of the amendment is: 16,416,691*

4. Officer Signature (Required)


/s/ James H. Alexander
----------------------
James H. Alexander, President

* If any proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
or other right given to any class or series of outstanding shares, then the
amendment must be approved by the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise required, of the holders of shares representing a majority of the
voting power of each class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations or restrictions on the voting power thereof.

IMPORTANT: Failure to include any of the above information and remit the proper
fees may cause this filing to be rejected.
Exhibit 32.1 - Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934;



(2) The information contained in the report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 11, 2005 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                       |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                       |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer



14
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83840]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24155]



[[Page 83840]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE377]


North Pacific Fishery Management Council; Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of web conference.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The North Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) Bering 
Sea Aleutian Islands Crab Plan Team (BSAI CPT) will meet November 5, 
2024.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Tuesday, November 5, 2024, from 9 
a.m. to 12 p.m., AK time.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be a web conference. Join online through 
the link at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/3062.
    Council address: North Pacific Fishery Management Council, 1007 
West 3rd Ave., Suite 400, Anchorage, AK 99501-2252; telephone: (907) 
271-2809. Instructions for attending the meeting via video conference 
are given under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anita Kroska, Council staff; phone: 
(907) 271-2809; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#04656a6d70652a6f766b776f65446a6b65652a636b72"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e88986819c89c6839a879b8389a886878989c68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>. For technical support, 
please contact our admin Council staff, email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3d534d5b505e135c595054537d53525c5c135a524b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="650b150308064b0401080c0b250b0a04044b020a13">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Agenda

Tuesday, November 5, 2024

    The agenda will include Norton Sound Red King crab (NSRKC) 
assessment updates and final specifications, and any other business. 
The agenda is subject to change, and the latest version will be posted 
at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/3062 prior to the 
meeting, along with meeting materials.

Connection Information

    You can attend the meeting online using a computer, tablet, or 
smart phone, or by phone only. Connection information will be posted 
online at https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/3062.

Public Comment

    Public comment letters will be accepted and should be submitted 
electronically to https://meetings.npfmc.org/Meeting/Details/3062.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 15, 2024.
Alyssa Weigers,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-24155 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Minerals Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Damian O'Hara, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Damian O'Hara
------------------------------
Principal Financial Officer
y

MANDATE

Court of Appeals 

First District of Texas 

NO. 01-14-00616-CV

ANGELINA GAILEY, DAN PATRICK GAILEY, TRUSTEE, AND PATRICK LEE

GAILEY, TRUSTEE, Appellants

V.

ROSE THOMPSON, Appellee

Appeal from the Probate Court No. 4 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 318,024).

TO THE PROBATE COURT NO. 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court, on the 11th day of December, 2014, the cause upon appeal to 

revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these 

words:

Appellants, Angelina Gailey, Dan Patrick Gailey, Trustee, and 

Patrick Lee Gailey, Trustee, neither established indigence nor paid, or made 

arrangements to pay, all the required fees. Further, appellants have not paid 

or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. After 

being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellants did not 

adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED, and

ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed. 
It is further ORDERED that appellants pay all costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal. It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified 

below for observance.

Judgment rendered December 11, 2014.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justices

Bland and Huddle.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this 

behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

February 20, 2015 

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

 CLERK OF THE COURT
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Everlert, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, James H. Alexander, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.


/s/ James H. Alexander
James H. Alexander
Chief Executive Officer

DATE::
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2862

To suspend temporarily the duty on Exisulind.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 13, 2000

Mr. SANTORUM introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Exisulind.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.29.01 5-fluro-2-methyl1-[[4-

methylsulfonylphenyl] methylene]-

indene-3-ylacetic

acid (CAS No.

59973–80–7)

(provided for in

subheading

2930.90.29) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003 ’’.
2

•S 2862 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China SHESAYS
Medical Cosmetology Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

i. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.

|Date: August 14, 2010 | /s/
      Yixiang Zhang
|--------------------- | -----------------------
|                      | Yixiang Zhang          
|                      | Chief Executive Officer

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure America Acquisition Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C.
      Thomas McMillen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August
                12, 2008
            /s/
                C. Thomas McMillenC.
                Thomas McMillenPrincipal
                Executive Officer