alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1.     | Such                Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending November                30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or                15(d)                of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |

| 2.     | The                information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the period ending November 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all                material respects, the financial condition and results of operations                of                Support Span, Inc. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               |

| Date:                December 31, 2007                                                                     |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                       |
| /s/                D. Chad                Allison                                                          |
| D.                Chad AllisonChief                Executive OfficerChief                Financial Officer |
S. 3201

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To rename the National Museum of American Art.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RENAMING OF NATIONAL MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART.

(a) IN GENERAL.—The National Museum of American Art, as

designated under section 1 of Public Law 96–441 (20 U.S.C. 71

note), shall be known as the ‘‘Smithsonian American Art Museum’’.

(b) REFERENCES IN LAW.—Any reference in any law, regulation,

document, or paper to the National Museum of American Art shall

be considered to be a reference to the Smithsonian American Art

Museum.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

Section 1 shall take effect on the day after the date of enactment

of this Act.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this amended quarterly report of Amiworld, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A3 for the six month period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated        below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: March 29, 2010 | s/Mamoru Saito______________________

Mamoru Saito, Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                        |
| Dated: March 29, 2010 | s/David Garin________________________

David Garin, Chief Financial Officer |
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3244

To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to the airport noise and

access review program.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 26 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

A BILL

To amend title 49, United States Code, relating to the

airport noise and access review program.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Section 47524(d) of title 49, United States Code, is

4 amended—

5 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph

6 (5)(B);

7 (2) by striking the period at the end of para8 graph (6) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

9 (3) by inserting at the end the following:
2

•S 3244 IS

1 ‘‘(7) a local restriction limiting the hours of op2 eration of an airport adopted by the airport operator

3 but disallowed by a court before 1985 if—

4 ‘‘(A) the airport operator adopted before

5 1985 a policy of encouraging voluntary limita6 tion of the hours of operation; and

7 ‘‘(B) the airport operator entered into an

8 agreement before 1985 with scheduled air car9 riers regulating the capacity of the airport ter10 minal.’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 318 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 318

    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to facilitate the 
    immigration to the United States of certain aliens born in the 
   Philippines or Japan who were fathered by United States citizens.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 28, 1999

  Mr. Inouye introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to facilitate the 
    immigration to the United States of certain aliens born in the 
   Philippines or Japan who were fathered by United States citizens.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
That section 204(f)(2)(A) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1154(f)(2)(A)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(I)'' after ``born''; and
            (2) by inserting after ``subsection,'' the following: 
        ``(II) in the Philippines after 1950 and before November 24, 
        1992, or (III) in Japan after 1950 and before the date of 
        enactment of this subclause,''.
                                 <all>
```
Airworthiness Directive

Pacific Aerospace 750XL Aircraft

Issued by the Civil Aviation Authority of New Zealand in accordance with section 72I(3A) of the Civil Aviation Act. An Airworthiness Directive 

(AD) contains regulatory information which is mandatory. An operator of an aircraft must not operate the aircraft unless the operator complies 

with every applicable AD issued by the Director in accordance with section 72I(3A) of the Civil Aviation Act. An AD is issued where the 

Director believes on reasonable grounds that an unsafe condition exists in an aircraft or aeronautical product.

* DCA/750XL/17 Reversionary Attitude Indicator - Installation

Applicability: Pacific Aerospace 750XL aircraft, all S/N operating under Instrument Flight Rules (IFR).

Note: Pacific Aerospace 750XL aircraft eligible for operation under IFR require a reversionary 

attitude indicator.

Requirement: To ensure continued safe flight under IFR in the event of loss of the primary attitude indication, 

accomplish the requirements in Pacific Aerospace Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) 

PACSB/XL/074 issue 1, dated 24 October 2014.

(Compliance with FAR 23.1309)

Compliance: Before the next IFR flight.

Effective Date: 6 November 2014

Background: This AD with effective date 6 November 2014 is prompted by a recent determination that 

certain PAL750XL aircraft were inadvertently manufactured with instrument panels with only 

one Attitude Indicator (AI). A second AI is required for PAL750XL operating under Instrument 

Flight Rules (IFR).

The AD mandates the installation of either a second AI, or the enablement of Reversionary 

Attitude mode in the Sandel Electronic Horizontal Situation Indicator (EHSI), if fitted, when 

operating under IFR.

Owen Olls

Airworthiness Specialist

Delegate of the Civil Aviation Authortiy of New Zealand

30 October 2014
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3265

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify treatment of employee

stock purchase plans.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 31 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. CRAIG introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

treatment of employee stock purchase plans.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXCLUSION OF EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE

4 PLAN STOCK OPTIONS FROM WAGES.

5 (a) EXCLUSION FROM WAGES.—

6 (1) EMPLOYMENT TAXES.—Section 3121(a) of

7 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to defi8 nition of wages) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at the

9 end of paragraph (20), by striking the period at the

10 end of paragraph (21) and inserting ‘‘; or’’, and by
2

•S 3265 IS

1 inserting after paragraph (21) the following new

2 paragraph:

3 ‘‘(22) a transfer of a share of stock to any indi4 vidual pursuant to an exercise of an incentive stock

5 option (as defined in section 422(b)) or under an

6 employee stock purchase plan (as defined in section

7 423(b)) or any disposition by the individual of such

8 stock.’’.

9 (2) UNEMPLOYMENT TAXES.—Section 3306(b)

10 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to

11 definition of wages) is amended by striking ‘‘or’’ at

12 the end of paragraph (16), by striking the period at

13 the end of paragraph (17) and inserting ‘‘; or’’, and

14 by inserting after paragraph (17) the following new

15 paragraph:

16 ‘‘(18) a transfer of a share of stock to any indi17 vidual pursuant to an exercise of an incentive stock

18 option (as defined in section 422(b)) or under an

19 employee stock purchase plan (as defined in section

20 423(b)) or any disposition by the individual of such

21 stock.’’.

22 (b) WITHHOLDING NOT REQUIRED ON DISQUALI23 FYING DISPOSITIONS.—Section 421(b) of the Internal

24 Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to effect of disqualifying

25 dispositions) is amended by adding at the end the fol-
3

•S 3265 IS

1 lowing new sentence: ‘‘For purposes of chapter 24 of sub2 title C (but not section 41(b)(2)(D)(i)), a disposition de3 scribed in the preceding sentence shall not be considered

4 to be wages.’’.

5 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

6 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning before,

7 on, or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 By:
    
    /s/ Ezra J. GreenName: Ezra J. GreenTitle: Chairman & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)Dated: July 21, 2008By:
    
    /s/ Arthur L. GoldbergName: Arthur L. GoldbergTitle: Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)Dated: July 21, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-40162

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ISIDORO LOPEZ-GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:00-CR-7-ALL

--------------------

December 12, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Isidoro Lopez-Gomez appeals his sentence of 71 months’

imprisonment following his plea of guilty to a charge of being

found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8

U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that

resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2)

was an element of the offense that should have been charged in

the indictment.

Lopez-Gomez acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by

the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United
No. 01-40162

-2-

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). 

Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See Apprendi,

530 U.S. at 489-90; United States v. Dabeit, 231 F.3d 979, 984

(5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). LopezGomez’s argument is foreclosed. The judgment of the district

court is AFFIRMED.
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. No. 01-4448



# 
L UKE S TEWART , J R .,

Defendant-Appellant. 

# 
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Dennis W. Shedd, District Judge.

(CR-01-128) Submitted: January 25, 2002 Decided: April 11, 2002 Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSEL John H. Hare, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellant. Jane Barrett Taylor, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM: Luke Stewart, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence of seventy months imprisonment after a guilty plea to a superseding information for distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1) (West 1999), using and carrying a firearm during and in relation to, and possessing a firearm in furtherance of, a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 924(c)(1) (West 2000), and criminal forfeiture under 21 U.S.C.A. § 853 (West 1999 & Supp. 2001). Stewart’s counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), addressing whether the magistrate judge fully complied with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 in accepting Stewart’s guilty plea, and whether the district court committed error in sentencing Stewart, but stating that in his opinion there were no meritorious issues for appeal. Although advised of his right to do so, Stewart has not filed a pro se supplemental brief. We have reviewed the record and find that the magistrate judge adequately complied with the mandates of Fed. R. Crim. P. 11 inaccepting Stewart’s guilty plea. We further find that Stewart’s sentence was proper; the ten month sentence on the drug distribution count was within the properly calculated guidelines range, and the sixty month sentence on the firearm count was mandated by statute. As required by Anders , we have examined the entire record and find no other meritorious issues for appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Stewart’s conviction and sentence. This court requires that counsel inform his client, in writing, of his right to petition the Supreme Court of the United States for further review. If the client requests that a petition be filed, but counsel believes that such a petition would be frivolous, then counsel may move in this court for leave to withdraw from representation. Counsel’s motion must state that a copy thereof was served on the client. 2 U NITED S TATES v. S TEWARTWe dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. S TEWART
Exhibit 15.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration Nos. 333-09840, 333-12146, 333-14238, 333-109874, 333-118930 and 333-157094) of Retalix Ltd. of our report dated June 15, 2010, relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2009.
 
 /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman
 A member of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
 Tel-Aviv, Israel
 June 15, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED MAY 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>               <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  YEAR              YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAY-31-2000       MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-01-1999       JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAY-31-2000       MAY-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1                 1
<CASH>                                         197,124           103,513
<SECURITIES>                                   0                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  0                 0
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0                 0
<INVENTORY>                                    0                 0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               245,872           103,513
<PP&E>                                         0                 0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 245,872           103,513
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          121,944           119,910
<BONDS>                                        0                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0                 0
<PREFERRED>                                    0                 0
<COMMON>                                       862,140           682,140
<OTHER-SE>                                     (738,210)         (698,537)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   245,872           103,513
<SALES>                                        0                 0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               0                 0
<CGS>                                          0                 0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  0                 0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               203,175           518,574
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             0                 16,667
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (203,175)         (535,241)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0                 0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (203,175)         (535,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (26,998)          0
<CHANGES>                                      0                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (230,173)         (535,241)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.02)            (0.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  (0.02)            (0.07)


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350  In connection with this Quarter Report of CHINA NORTHERN MEDICAL DEVICE, INC. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jinzhao Wu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1.Such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in such Quarter Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of CHINA NORTHERN MEDICAL DEVICE, INC.  Date: August 4, 2009/s/ Jinzhao WuJinzhao Wu
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Financial Officer