alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 DISCLOSURE IN THE REGISTRANT'S ANNUAL REPORT  I, Gary C. Granoff, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of Ameritrans Capital Corporation, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-k of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "report");  2. Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by the report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in the report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of the report (evaluation date); and  (c) Presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on my evaluation as of the evaluation date.  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weakness in internal controls; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and  6. I have indicated in the report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of my most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weakness.  Dated: September 28, 2007   /s/ Gary C. Granoff GARY C. GRANOFF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
---

---

# Exhibit 10.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements Nos. 333-125879 and No. 333-140937 on Form S-8 of
B.V.R Systems (1998) Ltd. (the Company) of our report dated June 29, 2008,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiary as of
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes
in shareholders equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period
ended December 31, 2007, which report appears in the Companys Annual Report on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Our report on the consolidated
financial statements refers to a restatement in the US GAAP net loss for the year ended
December 31, 2006.

Somekh Chaikin
Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
Member firm of KPMG International
June 29, 2008



---

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 09-1329

ROY SUDDUTH, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant, 

 v. 

BRENDA VASQUEZ; CARMEN BONILLA; ROBERT C. KETTLER; MITCHELL 

MITCHELL; ZARRICK VENEY; HERNANDO RODRIQUEZ; GLEN WHITE; 

CRESTVIEW COMMONS, d/b/a Fields of Landmark; WILLIAM 

DEARMAN; ELIJAH JOHNSON; TERRENCE D. LANGFORD; CYNTHIA 

THOMPSON; KIMBERLY WADE; TALORI JOHNSON; ROY TRIESE; WILLIAM 

D. EUILLE; KSI MANAGEMENT INCORPORATED; SCOTT MANAGEMENT 

INCORPORATED; AMEURFINA BRAGA; MARCELO JORDAN; EVELYN 

GLEASON; HAROLD MANGOLD; JOHN P. ELLIS; RICHARD V. MINIONIS; 

NICOLE M. BACON; LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHERN VIRGINIA; HOPE 

MAYFIELD; BARBARA DELANDER; MARGARET N. FRENCH; BECKY J. 

MOORE; DONALD M. HADDOCK, JR.; JEAN KELLEHER NIEBAUER; PAULA 

A. AVILA-GUILLEN; DAVID MILLER; STEVEN PRESTON; ROSS CONLAN; 

LEE A. PALMAN; ALEXANDRIA REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING 

AUTHORITY; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA; JOHN CATLETT; 

JANNINE PENNELL; ROBERT RODRIGUEZ; RUSSELL FURR; TIMOTHY 

LAWMASTER; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA OFFICE OF BUILDING AND FIRE 

CODE ADMINISTRATION; CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, OFFICE OF HUMAN 

RIGHTS; ALEXANDRIA, VIRGINIA GENERAL DISTRICT COURT; 

ALEXANDRIA SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF 

HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, 

 Defendants - Appellees. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, 

District Judge. (1:08-cv-01106-LMB-TCB) 

Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009 
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. 

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Roy Sudduth, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

2 
3 

PER CURIAM: 

Roy Sudduth appeals the district court’s order denying 

his motion to file an amended complaint and dismissing his civil 

action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Sudduth v. Vasquez, No. 1:08-cv-01106-LMB-TCB 

(E.D. Va. Mar. 18, 2009). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
IN THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS

HANDDOWN LIST OF JANUARY 20 , 2015

WESTERN DISTRICT

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 84.16(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ------------------------------------------------------------------

WD76318 James R. Schn elle vs. State of Missouri

WD77015 Damien Davis vs. State of Missouri

WD77348 Johnny Gidden vs. Division of Employment Security

WD77542 William E. Walls vs. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, et al

THE FOLLOWING CASES WERE AFFIRMED PURSUANT TO RULE 30.25(b)

AND ISSUED PER CURIAM



### ---------------------------------------------------------------- --

WD75612 State of Missouri vs. Joseph S. Rogers

WD77025 State of Missouri vs. Michael Lee Maddox

WD77058 State of Missouri vs. Christopher Artis, Jr.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 388 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-63, K2025-61.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24080 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 469 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-72, K2025-70.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24076 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit10-1-ThirdExtensionAgreementPraesumo


EXHIBIT 10.1


THIRD EXTENSION AGREEMENT 
This Third Extension Agreement is entered into on August 20, 2014 by and between Diamond Resorts Centralized Services Company (the "Company") and Praesumo Partners, LLC ("Independent Contractor"). 
The parties had executed and delivered a Terms of Engagement Agreement for Individual Independent Contractor dated as of June 1, 2009, an Extension Agreement thereto, effective as of June 1, 2010, an Amendment to Extension Agreement dated January 1, 2011, and a Second Extension Agreement dated September 12, 2012, which was automatically renewed for a term through August 31, 2014 (collectively, the “Prior Agreement”). The parties now wish to formalize their agreement that the Prior Agreement be extended for an additional one-year period (the “Term”). Any additional extensions of the Term shall require agreement of the parties. Capitalized terms not defined in this Third Extension Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Prior Agreement. 
Therefore, the undersigned hereby agree that: 
		
	a)
	The Prior Agreement is hereby extended for an additional one-year term, which shall commence as of September 1, 2014, and shall expire on August 31, 2015. 


		
	b)
	Independent Contractor shall be reimbursed per diem for expenses incurred in connection with providing services within this Agreement but not to exceed a maximum daily reimbursement of $2,000 for all expenses, excluding airfare, provided that the maximum daily limit for hotel/lodging expenses shall not exceed $1,000 per day, and the maximum daily limit for car service/ground transportation shall not exceed $500 per day.




		
	c)
	The parties hereby agree that, except as expressly modified pursuant to this Extension Agreement, Prior Agreement remains in full force and effect.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Extension Agreement has been executed as of the date first written above.


Praesumo Partners, LLC


By: /s/ Lowell D. Kraff___________
Name: Lowell D. Kraff
Title: Managing Member




Diamond Resorts Centralized Services Company 


By: /s/ Jared T. Finkelstein_________
Name: Jared T. Finkelstein
Title: SVP, General Counsel & Secretary
<Page>

                                                                   Exhibit 10.34


                                 FIRST AMENDMENT


         This First Amendment pertains to the License Agreement (hereinafter
the "License Agreement") effective December 16, 1996 by and between the
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (hereinafter referred to M.I.T.) and
ORASOMAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a subsidiary of Endorex Corporation, (hereinafter
referred to as LICENSEE).

         WHEREAS, LICENSEE has improved liposomal vehicles for oral and
mucosal vaccine development, has demonstrated the feasibility of oral vaccines
in animal studies, and has established vigorous development programs for the
commercialization of this technology at both its Lake Forest laboratories and
at the labs of its joint venture partner, Elan, plc, but is not yet ready to
enter, per the terms of section 3.4, into clinical trials.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree:

         To modify the License Agreement by deleting Paragraph 3.4 in its
         entirety and substituting therefore the following:

              3.4     On or before January 1, 2002, Orasomal Technologies will
              enter Phase I clinical trials or equivalent on the U.S. or other
              Major Country for at least one application of the technology
              described in the Patent Right.

         In consideration of this modification of the License Agreement, the
         License Maintenance Fees due on January 1, 2000 and January 1, 2001,
         per the terms of sections 4.1b and 4.1d, will each be Fifteen Thousand
         Dollars ($15,000).

         Should LICENSEE enter in to Phase I clinical trials on or before
         January 1, 2001, the license maintenance fee due on January 1, 2001
         shall again be $10,000.

         All other terms and conditions of the above referenced License
Agreement remain unchanged and in full force and effect.


Agreed to for M.I.T. by:                      Agreed to for LICENSEE by:

MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF                    ORASOMAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
TECHNOLOGY


By    /s/ John H. Turner, Jr.                 By    /s/ Robert [illegible]
   ---------------------------------             -------------------------------
Name      John H. Turner, Jr.                 Name      Robert [illegible]
     -------------------------------               -----------------------------
Title   Technology Licensing Office           Title  V.P. Research & Development
      ------------------------------                ----------------------------
Date        29 Dec 1999                       Date         30 Dec 1999
     -------------------------------               -----------------------------
EXHIBIT
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 The
undersigned, Asher Zwebner, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and
Director of Cardio Vascular Medical Device Corp. (the “Company”), certifies,
under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his
knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31 2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
  Date
      May 17, 2010.
                  By:
                  /s/
      Asher ZwebnerName:
                  Asher
      ZwebnerTitle:
                  Treasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer andSecretary
      and Director(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7212

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ANTOINE DEWAYNE MYLES, a/k/a Twan,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (5:15-cr-00172-BO-2)

Submitted: November 19, 2020 Decided: November 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Antoine Dewayne Myles, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Antoine Dewayne Myles seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his 

motion for judgment of acquittal or, alternatively, for a new trial. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, United States v. Sueiro, 946 F.3d 637, 639-40 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 140 

S. Ct. 2553 (2020). The order Myles seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an 

appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Myles’ motion to 

appoint counsel and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit
32


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the
Quarterly Report of SN Strategies Corp. a Nevada corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Michael Hawks, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The Report fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and






(2)
            The information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to SN Strategies
Corp., and will be retained by SN Strategies Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
















/s/
Michael Hawks


Michael
Hawks


Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer


November 13,
2008
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the period ending February      29, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for      the period ending February 29, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      SupportSpan, Inc. |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      April 14, 2008                                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |
| /s/ D. Chad Allison                                                          |
| D.      Chad AllisonChief      Executive OfficerChief      Financial Officer |
y



### MANDATE



## Court of Appeals

**First District of Texas**

NO. 01

- 1 4

- 0 0 6 16

- CV

ANGELINA GAILEY, DAN PATRICK GAILEY, TRUS TEE, AND PATRICK LEE GAILEY, TRUSTEE , Appellant s

V.

ROSE THOMPSON , Appellee

Appeal from the Probate Court No. 4 of Harris County. (Tr. Ct. No. 318,024 ).

TO THE PROBATE COURT NO. 4 OF HARRIS COUNTY, GREETINGS:

Before this Court , on the 11 th day of December

, 201 4 , the cause upon appeal to

revise or to reverse your judgment was determined. This Court made its order in these

words:

Appellant s
, Angelina Gailey, Dan Patrick Gailey, Trustee, and Patrick Lee Gailey, Trustee , neither established indigence nor paid, or made arrangements to pay, all the require d fees. Further, appellant s ha ve not paid or made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. After being notified that this appeal was subject to dismissal, appellant s did not adequately respond. It is therefore CONSIDERED

, ADJUDGED

, and

ORDERED that the appeal be dismissed.It is further ORDERED that appellant s pay all costs in curred by reason of this appeal

. It is further ORDERED that this decision be certified

below for observance.

Judgment rendered December 11 , 2014

.

Judgment rendered by panel consisting of Chief Justice Radack and Justice s Bland and Huddle

.

WHEREFORE, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court in this behalf and in all things to have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

February 20, 2015

Date CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

CLERK OF THE COURT
null

Other

1896.768