alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 29, 2012 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: October 29, 2012 |  |  |  | /s/ Richard L. Feinstein
Richard L. Feinstein
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act
and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned,
Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 13, 2009 |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                         |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                         |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 20-20266 

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee, 

versus

Pedro Mondragon-Gonzalez, 

Defendant—Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 4:14-CR-581-1 

Before Davis, Jones, and Elrod, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Pedro 

Mondragon-Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief 

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United 

States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Mondragon-Gonzalez has not 

filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions 

*

 Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this 

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited 

circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

July 9, 2021 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 20-20266 Document: 00515932653 Page: 1 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
No. 20-20266 

2 

of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that 

the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, 

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused 

from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 

See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 

Case: 20-20266 Document: 00515932653 Page: 2 Date Filed: 07/09/2021
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1383 Lower Tribunal Nos. F18-17398, F18-13708 and F18-13710

________________ 

### Aristides Alfonso , Appellant, vs. 

### The State of Florida , Appellee. An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Zachary James, Judge. Aristides Alfonso, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and LOGUE, and BOKOR, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MICHAEL BROWN, a/k/a Michael  No. 01-4611

Haseem Brown, a/k/a Rasheem

Jamal Russell, a/k/a Hakeem

Brown, a/k/a Rasheem Russell,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Claude M. Hilton, Chief District Judge;

Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge.

(CR-01-23-A)

Submitted: January 18, 2002

Decided: February 8, 2002

Before TRAXLER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and

HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Peter L. Goldman, O’REILLY & MARK, L.L.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Paul J. McNulty, United States Attorney, Kathleen M. Kahoe, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,

Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Michael Brown appeals his conviction following his conditional

guilty plea to one count of possession of a firearm by a felon. See 18

U.S.C.A. § 922(g)(1) (West 2000). On appeal, Brown asserts the district court improperly denied his motion to suppress a firearm found

in his shoe following his arrest. We affirm. 

Brown was arrested for public intoxication, and the firearm in

question was discovered during a subsequent custodial search of

Brown’s person. Accordingly, unless the arrest was illegal, that search

does not implicate the Fourth Amendment. See Chimel v. California,

395 U.S. 752, 762-63 (1969) (holding police officers may conduct

warrantless search of suspect’s person after arrest to remove weapons

that could be used to resist arrest or escape). Reviewing evidence

presented at the suppression hearing in the light most favorable to the

government, see United States v. Seidman, 156 F.3d 542, 547 (4th

Cir. 1998) (providing standard of review), we find there was an adequate basis for Brown’s arrest for public intoxication, and that that

basis existed prior to the frisk conducted by the arresting officer. See

Ker v. California, 374 U.S. 23, 37 (1963) (noting the legality of arrest

for state offense that does not otherwise implicate the Constitution is

to be judged by state law); Fierst v. Virginia, 173 S.E.2d 807, 810 n.2

(Va. 1970) (providing statutory definition of intoxicated). Accordingly, we find no error in the district court’s denial of Brown’s motion

to suppress. 

In light of the foregoing, we affirm Brown’s conviction and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. BROWN
Exhibit 99.14























CONSENT








Ladies
and Gentlemen:





The
undersigned company hereby consents to (1) the references to the
undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in
the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection
with (a) the report entitled “Technical Report on the Denison
Mines Inc. Uranium Properties, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated
November 21, 2005, as amended on February 16, 2006, (b) the report
entitled “Technical Report on the McClean North Uranium
Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate, Saskatchewan, Canada”
dated January 31, 2007, (c) the report entitled “Technical
Report on the Sue D Uranium Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate,
Saskatchewan, Canada” dated March 31, 2006, and (2) all other
references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines
Corp.





Dated:
March 28, 2018








Per:





(Signed) “Richard E
Routledge”


_____________________________________


Richard
E. Routledge, M.Sc., P.Geo.


Title:
President and CEO


Associate
Principal Geologist











RPA 55 University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J
2H7 | T +1 (416) 947
0907 www.rpacan.com
ANNUAL
STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE
 
 
 Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
 as of
July 1, 2012, by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization
Corp., as Depositor, 
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CW Capital
Asset Management, LLC, 
as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as Operating Advisor
and U.S. Bank, National 
Association as Trustee, Certificiate Administrator, Paying Agent and
Custodian, with respect to 
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-C2 (the
"Agreement"). Capitalized 
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.
 Pursuant
to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of
 Commercial
Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:
 1.
 
 A
review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from July 1,
2012 through 
December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period 
has been made under my supervision, and
 2.
 
 To the
best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled
all of its 
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout
the period July 
1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
 
 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of
the 13th day
 
 
 of
March 2013.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 /s/ Daniel Bober 
Daniel Bober 
Executive Vice President
 
 
 Wells
Fargo Bank
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ATLAS IP, LLC,

Appellant

v.

ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC., ST. JUDE MEDICAL 

S.C., INC., PACESETTER, INC., BIOTRONIK, INC.,

Appellees

______________________ 

2017-1395

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark 

Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Nos. IPR2014-

00916, IPR2015-00534.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

MATTHEW TOPIC, Loevy & Loevy, Chicago, IL, argued 

for appellant.

 MATTHEW A. SMITH, Smith Baluch LLP, Washington, 

DC, argued for all appellees. 

 JEFFREY M. OLSON, SOA Legal, Los Angeles, CA, for 

appellee Biotronik, Inc. Also represented by SAMUEL N.

TIU, Sidley Austin LLP, Los Angeles, CA.
 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, Chief Judge, CLEVENGER and 

LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 March 13, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
---

---

# Exhibit 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of B.V.R. Systems (1998) Ltd (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Ilan Gillies, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|1. | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as
               applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|2. | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: June 4, 2009

| |  | /s/ Ilan Gillies
Chief Executive Officer
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.



---

---
(logo)LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as specialservicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for thetransactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject toany limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2018 and ending on December 31, 2018 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 19, 2019

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

MSBAM 2012-C6

Morgan Stanley Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch Trust 2012-C6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2012-C6

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1221 Avenue of the Americas

New York NY 10020

James Y. Lee

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York NY 10036

Stephen Holmes

 

Situs Holdings, LLC

4665 Southwest Freeway

Houston TX 77027

Pete Larsen

 

Situs Holdings, LLC

2 Embarcadero, Suite 1300

San Francisco CA 94111

Stacey Ciarlanti

 

U.S. Bank, NationalAssociation

190 South LaSalle Street, 7th Floor

Att: MSBAM 2016-C6

Chicago IL 60603

General

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices
*December 7, 1943.*

#### Will of Gardner: Hahn, Administrator, Respondent, vs. Kent and another, Appellants.

For the appellants : *Hill, Miller & Hill*of Baraboo.

For the respondent: *PI: M. Longer*of Baraboo'.

*By the Court.*

Order affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,248  
<SECURITIES>                                     1,488  
<RECEIVABLES>                                      457 
<ALLOWANCES>                                        90 
<INVENTORY>                                          0  
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,165 
<PP&E>                                             504 
<DEPRECIATION>                                     250 
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,459 
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              854 
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0 
<COMMON>                                             3 
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,780 
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,459 
<SALES>                                            998 
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   998 
<CGS>                                              270 
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,503 
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0 
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0 
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0 
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (793)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (793)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0 
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0 
<CHANGES>                                            0 
<NET-INCOME>                                      (793)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24 
                                                

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christian Mancillas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Rosca, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Rosca, Inc.


Date: May 12, 2008                      By: /s/ Christian Mancillas
                                           -------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Christian Mancillas
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-6147
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MICHAEL CHAMBERS, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, Chief District Judge. (1:99-cr-00451-BEL; 1:04-cv-01531-BEL) Submitted: June 2, 2008 Decided: July 8, 2008 Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Chambers, Appellant Pro Se. James G. Warwick, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Michael Chambers seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Chambers has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service                               ( print page 84943)                            Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 24, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 15, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 482 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-86, K2025-84.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24606 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 30447

**____________ Imperial Crane Services, Incorporated,** 
Plaintiff

— Appellant **,**

versus
**H & E Equipment Services, Incorporated,**
Defendant

— Appellee

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC N o. 2:21

- CV

- 1183

**______________________________** Before **Richman ,**  Chief Judge **,** and **Jones** and **Ho ,**  Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** ***** We have carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs and the record

. Having done so, we find no error that would affect the judgment of the district court. We therefore affirm.

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. United States Court of Appe als Fifth Circuit 

### FILED August 8, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-30447 Document: 00516849903 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/08/2023