alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Acropolis Precious Metals, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB/A-1 for the period ended July 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Horst Balthes, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 22ndday of October, 2007.                                                                                                                 
|   

HORST BALTHESHorst Balthes, Chief Financial Officer





















---
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

310 

CA 14-01598 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

MICHAEL STEBICK, RONALD R. ANASTASIA AND 

JEFFREY R. ANASTASIA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

V ORDER

RITA MCGEE, KATHLEEN HOWARD, PATRICIA L. HUSTED, 

SANDRA L. KIBODEAUX AND SHARON E. PAULY, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

 

COLLIGAN LAW LLP, BUFFALO (A. NICHOLAS FALKIDES OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

WAGNER & HART, LLP, OLEAN (JANINE FODOR OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County

(Michael L. Nenno, A.J.), entered June 30, 2014. The order granted

the motion of defendants for leave to file an interlocutory appeal. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JEFFREY W. MCWILLIAMS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 267 MAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 6th day of October, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal, the

Motion to Appoint Counsel, and the Application for Leave to Amend are DENIED

.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7925** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. DIFANKH ASAR, a/k/a James Walter Gist , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg
. G. Ross Anderson, Jr. , Senior District Judge. ( 7:10

- cr - 00429

- GRA

- 1; 7:12

- cv - 01650

- GRA )

Submitted : March 2 8 , 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Difankh Asar, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Difankh Asar seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certific ate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the me rits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 5 37 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently review ed the record and conclude that Asar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.2




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT


I, Arthur
L. Goldberg, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Clear Skies Solar,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial
reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:





a. Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;








c. Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and





d. Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
      May 15, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Arthur L. GoldbergName:
              Arthur
      L. GoldbergTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer
                (Principal
      Financial Officer)
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**931 TP 16-00104**  PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, CURRAN, AND TROUTMAN, JJ.

JEFFREY JOSEPH, PETITIONER,

V ORDER

ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ACTING COMMISSIONER, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, RESPONDENT.

WYOMING COUNTY-ATTICA LEGAL AID BUREAU, WARSAW (LEAH R. NOWOTARSKI OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (FRANK BRADY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M. Mohun, A.J.], entered January 14, 2016) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated various inmate rules.

It is hereby ORDERED that said proceeding is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot ( see Matter of Free v Coombe , 234 AD2d 996).

Entered: November 10, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 447 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-40, K2025-39.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24048 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 408 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                 S. 408

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a former Bureau of 
Land Management administrative site to the city of Carson City, Nevada, 
                      for use as a senior center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT LANDS IN 
              CARSON CITY, NEVADA.

    (a) Conveyance.--Not later than 120 days after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through 
the Director of the Bureau of Land Management, shall convey to the city 
of Carson City, Nevada, without consideration, all right, title, and 
interest of the United States in the property described as Government 
lot 1 in sec. 8, T. 15 N., R. 20 E., Mount Diablo Meridian, as shown on 
the Bureau of Land Management official plat approved October 28, 1996, 
containing 4.48 acres, more or less, and assorted uninhabitable 
buildings and improvements.
    (b) Use.--The conveyance of the property under subsection (a) shall 
be subject to reversion to the United States if the property is used 
for a purpose other than the purpose of a senior assisted living center 
or a related public purpose.

            Passed the Senate April 13, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                 S. 408

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey a former Bureau of 
Land Management administrative site to the city of Carson City, Nevada, 
                      for use as a senior center.
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2

- 10

- 136

- CV

JAMES E. PORTER APPELLANT

V.

STATE BAR OF TEXAS APPELLEE

----------

FROM THE 67TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

----------

On August 2, 2010, we notified appellant that the trial court clerk responsible

for preparing the record in this appeal had informed this court that arrangements

had not been made to pay for the clerk = s record as required by Texas Rule of

Appel late Procedure 35.3(a)(2). See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a)(2). We stated that

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4

.2

we would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant , within

fifteen days, made arrangements to pay for the clerk = s record and provided this

court with proof of pay ment.

Because appellant has not made payment arrangements for the clerk = s

record, it is the opinion of the court that the appeal should be dismissed for want of

prosecution. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b),

42.3(b).

Appellant shall pay all costs of the appeal, for which let execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: August 27 , 2010
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Vortec Electronics, Inc. for the quarter      ended October 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended October 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Vortec Electronics,      Inc.. |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  By:    |  /s/ Melissa      Lopez                                                          |
|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Melissa      Lopez                                                              |
|  Title: |  Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  December      12, 2008                                                          |
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION**

Theundersigned officer of Albany Molecular Research, Inc. (the “Company”)hereby certifies that to his knowledge the Company’s annual report on Form 10-Kto which this certification is attached (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Thiscertification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 andItem 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K (“Item 601(b)(32)”) promulgated underthe Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the ExchangeAct. In accordance with clause (ii) of Item 601(b)(32), thiscertification (A) shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and(B) shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filingunder the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that theCompany specifically incorporates it by reference.
| Date: March 16, 2006 |   |                                     |
|---------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|
|                      |   | /s/  MARK T. FROST                       |
|                      | Name:  | Mark T. Frost                            |
|                      | Title: | *Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer* |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                                    DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                                                       JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                                         MAR-31-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                                                1
<CASH>                                                                     4,652
<SECURITIES>                                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                              3,079
<ALLOWANCES>                                                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                                               0
<PP&E>                                                                   807,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                                            44,432
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                           775,325
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                                          0
<BONDS>                                                                  435,917
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                                     203
<OTHER-SE>                                                               259,852
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                             775,325
<SALES>                                                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                                          29,021
<CGS>                                                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                              9,674
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                                           7,596
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                                         7,389
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                            4,362
<INCOME-TAX>                                                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                                        4,362
<DISCONTINUED>                                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                           (1,200)
<CHANGES>                                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                               3,162
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                                                .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                                .12
        

</TABLE>
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43091

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

GABINO VILLA,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2015 Unpublished Opinion No. 722

Filed: November 19, 2015

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Canyon County. Hon. Juneal C. Kerrick, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty years with five years 

determinate for felony DUI, with enhancement, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Jenny C. Swinford, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Gabino Villa pled guilty to felony driving under the influence of alcohol with a persistent 

violator enhancement. Idaho Code §§ 18-8004, 18-8005, 19-2514. The district court sentenced 

Villa to a unified term of twenty years with five years determinate. Villa appeals asserting that 

the district court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Villa’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

                Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,
      as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of clickNsettle.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the three months ended September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-QSB"), I, Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

      (1) The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
      and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


Dated: November 11, 2003


/s/ Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Patricia Giuliani-Rheaume - Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer


                                       23