alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Principal Executive OfficerRequired by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b)of the Exchange Act**

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Advanstar, Inc.(the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, JosephLoggia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result ofoperations of the Company.

 
| By:    | /s/ Joseph Loggia                      |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Joseph Loggia  Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                   |
| Date:  | March 30, 2006                         |

 

1

----
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

November 20,2013 

Justine Sanchez <jwsanche@hawaii.edu> 

Thursday, November 21, 2013 12:38 AM 

EAS (OST) 

Department of Transportation(DOT) 

···~ 

I am writing to support Mokulele Airline's 4-year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, Kapalua, and 

Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experiences friendly agents, frequent 

flights, multiple islands and east of booking via Global Distribution System (expedia, Travelocity, Orbitz, 

Priceline etc.) It is important we have safe, stable & affordable service to Kalaupapa. 

1
#### Cronin, Respondent, vs. Cronin and another, Appellants.

*December 6,*1943

January *18, 1944.*

*373For the appellants there was a brief by *Nolan, Dougherty, Grubb & Ryan*of Janesville, and oral argument by *William R. Dougherty.*

*Raymond C. Fett*of Janesville, for the respondent.

Fowler, J.

Esther Cronin sued her husband George and his insurer to recover under the death-by-wrongful-act statute, sec. 331.03, Stats., for the loss of the society and companionship of the infant daughter of the spouses resulting from the father’s striking and killing the child in negligently backing his automobile. The defendants demurred to' the complaint on the ground that it does'not state a cause of action. The court overruled the demurrer. The defendants appeal.

Sec. 331.03, Stats., expressly limits the bringing of the action to cases in which if death had not ensued the injured person would have been entitled “to maintain an action and recover damages in respect thereof.” In *Wick v. Wick,*192 Wis. 260, 212 N. W. 787, we held that a minor child cannot maintain an action against his father for injuries resulting to him through the father’s negligence. As the instant infant could not have sued the father had she lived the instant action does not lie.

The trial court held to the contrary because he considered that the recovery sought, being limited to “loss of society and companionship” is a different cause of action from that authorized by sec. 331.03, Stats. Not so: It is only an item of damage recoverable in that action. Sec. 331.04 declares who is entitled to recover under sec. 331.03. Prior to adoption of ch. 263, Laws of 1931, damages for loss of society and companionship were not recoverable in the action. Ch. 263 amended the existing sec. 331.04 by numbering it sec. 331.04 *374(1) and changing it by increasing the recovery theretofore allowed under sec. 331.04 from $10,000 to $12,500 and by providing for recovery to others in case the person entitled to recover should die after suit was brought, and added to the former section sub. (2) which reads:

“(2) In addition to the benefits provided for in subsection (1), a sum not exceeding twenty-five hundred dollars for loss of society and companionship shall accrue to the parent or parents or husband or wife of the deceased.”

*By the Court.*— The order of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded with instructions to sustain the demurrer and enter judgment dismissing the complaint.
OVERTURE SERVICES





Exhibit 4.1




	 	 	 
	NUMBER
	 	
SHARES

	   OS
	 	
 




 


overture LOGO TM


OVERTURE SERVICES, INC.



	 	 	 
	INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS

OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
	 	
SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS

CUSIP 69039R 10 0



This Certifies that



       


is the registered owner of


FULLY PAID AND NONASSESSABLE SHARES OF COMMON STOCK, $.0001 PAR VALUE OF




	 	 	 	 	 
	
	 	 	 	

	
	 	OVERTURE SERVICES, INC.	 	

	
	 	 	 	





transfer of which is registrable on the share register of the Corporation, upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed.
This Certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar.


     WITNESS the seal of the Corporation and the signatures of its duly authorized officers.


     Dated:



    



	 	 	 
	[ILLEGIBLE]
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER AND SECRETARY	 	
[ILLEGIBLE]
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





OVERTURE SERVICES, INC

SEAL

DELAWARE


    


COUNTERSIGNED AND REGISTERED:


     MELLON INVESTOR SERVICE LLC

	     	
	 	     TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR,



By

	               	
	 	     AUTHORIZED OFFICER
#### ROUNTOP v. STATE.

No. 18619.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 2, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 27, 1937.

R. H. Sigler, of Athens, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft of property over the value of $50; the punishment, confinement in the pententiary for two years.

The motion for new trial was overruled April 18, 1936, and notice of appeal given on the same date. The statement of facts was filed in the' trial court July 18, 1936, which was more than ninety days .from the date notice of appeal was given. This was too late and said statement of .facts is not entitled to consideration.

The only bill of exception that can be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts relates to appellant’s objection to the argument of the district attorney on the ground that it constituted a reference to the failure of appellant to testify. The bill recites that the district attorney referred to the fact that appellant had not offered any proof in support of his application for a suspended sentence. While it is certified in the bill that the appellant did not testify, there is nothing in said bill to show that no person other than appellant was in a position to give testimony in support of the application for a suspended sentence. *707Under the circumstances, the hill of exception is insufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Judge.

On motion for rehearing appellant questions the file mark on the statement of facts in the court below as reflecting the true date of such filing, it being his contention that it was lodged with the clerk within the exténsion period which had been allowed by the trial judge, and that the clerk inadvertently placed the wrong date of filing on it. Affidavits pro and con on the subject are before us. In view of the showing here made, the claim of a 'mistake in the filing date cannot be sustained.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
EXHIBIT 8.1

PRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF RETALIX LTD.

| | Subsidiary                                      |  |  | Country of
  Residence |  |  | Business
  Name          
| | ----------------------------------------------- |  |  | ---------------------- |  |  | -------------------------
| |                                                 |  |  |                        |  |  |                          
| | Retalix
  Holdings Inc.                         |  |  | United States          |  |  | Retalix
  USA Holdings   
| | Retalix
  USA Inc.                              |  |  | United States          |  |  | Retalix
  USA            
| | Retail
  Control Systems Inc.                   |  |  | United States          |  |  | Retalix
  USA, Pittsburgh
| | BASS
  Inc.                                     |  |  | United States          |  |  | Retalix
  USA, Dayton    
| | StoreNext
  Retail Technology LLC               |  |  | United States          |  |  | StoreNext
  USA          
| | OMI
  International Inc.                        |  |  | United States          |  |  | OMI                      
| | Palm
  Point Ltd.                               |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | Palm
  Point             
| | Tamar
  Industries M. R. Electronic (1985) Ltd. |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | Tamar                    
| | StoreAlliance.com,
  Ltd.                       |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | StoreAlliance            
| | StoreNext
  Ltd.                                |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | StoreNext
  Israel       
| | TradaNet
  Electronic Commerce Services Ltd.    |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | Tradanet                 
| | IREX 
  Israel Retail Exchange Ltd.            |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | IREX                     
| | DemanDX Ltd.                                    |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | DemanDX                  
| | Cell-Time
  Ltd.                                |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | Cell-Time                
| | P.O.S.
  (Restaurant Solutions) Ltd.            |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | PRS                      
| | Kohav
  Orion Advertising and Information Ltd.  |  |  | Israel                 |  |  | Orion                    
| | Retalix
  (UK) Limited                          |  |  | United Kingdom         |  |  | Retalix
  (UK)           
| | Retalix
  SA PTY Ltd.                           |  |  | South Africa           |  |  | Retalix
  SA             
| | Retalix
  Australia PTY Ltd.                    |  |  | Australia              |  |  | Retalix
  Australia      

---

---
Exhibit 99.12











CONSENT








Ladies
and Gentlemen:








The
undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the
undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in
the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection
with the report entitled “Mineral Resource Estimate On The J
Zone Uranium Deposit, Waterbury Lake Property” dated
September 6, 2013 and (2) all other references to the undersigned
included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form
40-F of Denison Mines Corp.











Dated:
March 28, 2018





(Signed)
“Alan
Sexton”


______________________


Alan
Sexton, M.Sc., P.Geol.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83027]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23685]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; BRAIN Initiative Connectivity 
across Scales (BRAIN CONNECTS): Specialized Projects for Scalable 
Technologies (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: November 7, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Address: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 
6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.
    Meeting Format: Virtual Meeting.
    Contact Person: Bo-Shiun Chen, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer, 
Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/
NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-
496-9223, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#50323f7d233839253e7e3338353e103e39387e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="23414c0e504b4a564d0d404b464d634d4a4b0d444c55">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS).

    Dated: October 8, 2024.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23685 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 10.1

 

ARRAY BIOPHARMA INC.

 

DESCRIPTION OF PERFORMANCE BONUS PROGRAM

 

Array BioPharma Inc. (the “Company”) has established an annual performance bonus program for employees, including the Company’s executive officers. Through this program, employees can receive an annual bonus payable in cash, stock or stock option equivalents based on achievement of key Company and individual goals.  There is no guarantee that bonuses will be awarded in any given year. The bonus program is intended to strengthen the connection between individual compensation and Company success; reinforce the Company’s pay-for-performance philosophy by awarding higher bonuses to higher performing employees; and help ensure that the Company’s cash compensation is competitive.

 

The Compensation Committee recommends for approval by the independent directors of the Board the minimum, target and stretch corporate performance goals, and the relative weighting of these goals, for the upcoming fiscal year. The goals generally are based on the following objective performance criteria: revenues, earnings per share, license revenue, year-end cash, discovery research goals and clinical development goals. Each participant in the bonus program may be eligible to receive a target bonus amount calculated by multiplying the participant’s base salary by a percentage value later assigned to the participant or his or her position with the Company by the Compensation Committee.

 

Following the end of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee determines in its discretion the extent to which the company-wide and individual performance goals were attained. Based on this assessment, the Compensation Committee will award bonuses equal to a varying percentage of an employee’s target bonus amount. The Compensation Committee may award a bonus in an amount less than or greater than the amount earned by a participant under the bonus program.

 

Individual bonuses can vary significantly based on performance. Any bonuses for a particular year are paid as a lump sum in cash, stock or stock option equivalents (or any combination thereof), less applicable payroll and other withholdings, in the quarter following that year. The plan can be amended in whole or in part by the Compensation Committee at any time until paid.

 

*****
EXHIBIT 10.4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

We consent to the incorporation by reference into the
Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-14238, 333-12146, 333-09840
and 333-109874) and Form F-3 (file no. 333-110681) of Retalix Ltd. (the
Company) of our report dated March 31, 2004 on the financial statements of
Cell-Time, Ltd., as of December 31, 2003 and for the year ended December 31,
2003 which appears in this Annual Report of the Company on Form 20-F as of and
for the year ending December 31, 2003.

Tel-Aviv, Israel 
June 28, 2004

| |  | /s/ KOST FORER GABBAY & KASIERER
Certified Public Accountants (Isr)A Member of Ernst & Young Global
| |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---

---
Exhibit 13.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Yantai Dahua Holdings, Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: July 30, 2007/s/ TANG YuxiangName:TANG YuxiangTitle:President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: July 30, 2007/s/ QU ShizhiName:QU ShizhiTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOFONIAS ALFARO-REYES, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 19-70742 

Agency No. A087-764-166 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2020**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Sofonias Alfaro-Reyes, a native and citizen of Honduras, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal 

from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for relief under the 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and denying his request to remand and 

terminate proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-70742 

factual findings for substantial evidence. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 

1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion 

to remand. Movsisian v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny 

the petition for review. 

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because 

Alfaro-Reyes failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with 

the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Honduras. See Aden 

v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009); see also Zheng v. Holder, 644 F.3d 

829, 835-36 (9th Cir. 2011) (possibility of torture too speculative).

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Alfaro-Reyes’ request to 

remand and terminate proceedings where his contention that the immigration court

lacked jurisdiction over his proceedings is foreclosed by Aguilar Fermin v. Barr, 

958 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2020) (omission of certain information from NTA can 

be cured for jurisdictional purposes by later hearing notice).

As stated in the court’s June 26, 2019 order, the temporary stay of removal 

remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
|   | (1) | the      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:  April      15, 2010 | /s/  Helen R.  Park            |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Helen      R. Park                       |
|                                  | Interim      Chief Executive Officer and |
|                                  | Interim      Chief Financial Officer     |

----
Slip Op. 23-

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

WUXI TIANRAN PHOTOVOLTAIC CO., 

LTD.,

Plaintiff, 

and 

JA SOLAR TECH. YANGZHOU CO., LTD., 

SHANGHAI JA SOLAR TECH. CO., LTD., 

and JINGAO SOLAR CO., LTD., 

Consolidated Plaintiffs, 

v. 

UNITED STATES, 

Defendant. 

Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge 

Consol. Ct. No. 21-00538

JUDGMENT 

Following remand, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) submitted 

the Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, ECF No. 38 (Oct. 6, 2022) 

(“Remand Results”). Plaintiff Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd., submitted comments on the 

Remand Results arguing that Commerce’s general practice of requiring “complete participation in 

verification” for all of a respondent’s customers is unreasonable. Comments on Remand 

Redetermination of Plaintiff, ECF No. 41 at 2–3 (Nov. 7, 2022) (“Tianran Comments”). 

Nevertheless, in this unique circumstance, Plaintiff concedes that the Remand Results comply with 

the court’s remand order and does not further challenge Commerce’s determination. Tianran 

Comments at 2–3 (“Tianran concedes that Commerce’s Remand Results generally complies with 

the [c]ourt’s Remand Order . . . . Tianran does not further challenge Commerce’s determination 

in the Remand Results”). Consolidated Plaintiffs do not raise any independent comments. See 
Objections to Remand Results of Consolidated Plaintiffs and Plaintiff-Intervenors, ECF. No. 42 

(Nov. 7, 2022). Accordingly, it is 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the Remand Results by Commerce are 

SUSTAINED. 

 /s/ Jane A. Restani 

 Jane A. Restani, Judge 

Dated: January 10, 2023 

New York, New York
r U.S.o.port,_,tofTransportation

**Q~f,c:e** or rr.e Secr'!!'Jr;:or **T!o~soo··::"OI'I** Chief. Documentary Services Div. 

### Depanment ofTransportation 

### Washington. D.C. 20590 

## TAM-Linhas Aereas S.A. DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C-55 (Name of Company. please print) . having irs principal office at 

# lo500 !\)W 1 

# Hturni ......, I I L- 

# 33t2 

# 2. . (Address) hereby de!»ignates. pursuilnl to !'>ection 46103 ofTitle .f9 ofthe U.S. Code 1fom1erly

**~ection** 1005!bl ofthe Fedeml A\iation Act of 1958. a:. amendedJ the per!\on named bt:-lou as it'Agent upon whom

**~en·ice** ofall

**notice~** and
**pro~.:e:-.~:**unc.J all

**Ndi:r-~. deci~ion-..**  ::md requirements orthe Depa11ment of·Transportation may be made for and on beh:Jirof

**~aid** c.. uTier. hereby canceling ull pn:viou:-.

**de~ignations** 

### of

**agent~** made by 

### it to the DOT. 

### Charles F. Donley II, charles.donley@squirepb.com, **1-202-626-6~40** 

### Name of **Agent--------------~~------------~~~--~----~----------~------** .. (Please Print) 

## 1200 19th Street, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20036 Address 

### ~~~~--------~----~--------~------~--~----------------------- The Agenc so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

# Name~j~l[ (Initials) __ 

# ..~,t"-..!.#/..c.::. ______ ___ IN WITNESS WHEREOF. 

## TAM-Linhas Aereas S.A. ---------------------------------------------- has caused these (Name of Company) presents to be signed in its name by 

## ___ 

# l-t:t...!.l~b~lo,;____:C.::::.n~i0::.Z~2:..::0::__________. Pre•ident



### A-!1Dr~ 

### In Faa-t' (Please Print) of said company. and to be attested under its corporate seal 

### by (Secretary. or other Title) on chis 

# l\.Q.j-h day of 

# ::RtnuCI.rlj 19 2015 

## TAM-Linhas Aereas 

# SA ATTEST: (Secretary. or other officer) OSTF 1010.5 (1-95)