alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARPINDER S. CHAHAL; GURMEET

K. CHAHAL,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 13-70347

Agency Nos. A078-361-295

A078-361-296

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted September 23, 2014** 

Before: W. FLETCHER, RAWLINSON, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.

 Harpinder S. Chahal and Gurmeet K. Chahal, natives and citizens of India,

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying

their motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen. 

FILED

OCT 2 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010). We deny the petition for

review. 

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying petitioners’ third motion to

reopen as untimely and number-barred where the motion was filed more than eight

years after the BIA’s final order, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners failed

to demonstrate changed conditions that qualify for the regulatory exception to the

time limit for filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi,

597 F.3d at 987 (evidence must be “qualitatively different” from the evidence

presented at the previous hearing). The record does not support petitioners’

contention that the BIA did not fully consider the evidence of police raids at

Harpinder’s father’s house. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED. 

2 13-70347
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 10:03 AM

To: 'everettcollie@live.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Request for Additional Information: E&J Photography (FAA-2015-3018)

October 2, 2015 

Dear Mr. Collie: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-3018). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by October 16, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of AI Document Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Leonard Armenta, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Leonard Armenta Leonard Armenta Title: President and Chief Financial Officer   August 13, 2014
### 14 CFR Part 39 [4910-13-PJ

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

### Federal Aviation Administration



# 003Q (Docket No. FAA-2010-*****; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-239-AD] R1N 2120-AA64 Airwortbiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-1Al1 (eL-600), CL-600-2AI2 (CL-60l), CL-600-2Bl6 (CL-60l-3A, CL-601-3R, and CL-604 Variant (Including CL-605 Marketing Variant)) Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice ofproposed rulemaking (NPRM). fftJlI1-IO \
• ,!AlSo'S",

NlTlAl,.SISI\; 

### SUMMARY: We propose to adopt anew airworthiness directive (AD) for theproduct .~rr 

### listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing ainvorthiness information (MeAl) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify NITlALSislG 

### and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MeAl describes the unsafe TE 

### condition as: Seven cases ofon-ground hydraulic accwnulator screw cap or end cap failure have been experienced on CL·600-2B19 (CRJ) aircraft, resulting in loss ofthe associated hydraulic system andhigh-energy impact damage to adjacent systems and structure. 

## ** * ITIAJ"S.':slli



## * * 

## * * * 

## * * NIl'IAL>IliIG

NITI"'-SlSIGl.il)J(I-IJ-Pj DEl'ARTM ENT OF TRANSPORTATlON ,',""-"""".,., '''v,',,,;;,·,'.',,.', \"1~·171 !'cdcl'a! A\'iatiOll Ailministnlti(lll 1,1CFR Parl 39 /2 

## I,F }v(!'{ IDnckd No. FAA-2009-;'''''''*'''; Oil'ccloratc Itlcntificr 20f)~-Nr\.J-2J9-i\n] H.1l\' 2120-AA64

''''''T~,T".·",,'', ,\:-;f:·17Il 

## .,.' / '\'/..-('"~r ""l',~,,'-,1",""." .-\"E·171 

# ;B:ttJe ".'" l.f 12.:l 0

## '1

"·1';1:.1 <'"'c, Airworthinc~.~ Directives; l3ombnrc!ier, Inc.lvhH.kl CIAiDO~lAII (Ct.-GOO),
AGENCY: Fedc.:ml /\via(ion Adminislra1ion (FAA), DOT. 

## cr AiOO-·1l\ 12 (CL-60 I), CL-WO-2B j 6 (CL-60 1-3i\. CL-60 I-3R, ,md CL-(-}()4 V;UiillliS

SU!\'I:\J!AH,Y: \Ve propose Iu lldopll1 new airworlhiness dircclivol.'\D) fll]' ill" products ACTION: Nolicc or proposed ru!cmaking (1\lpRM). (Including Cr.-60S Murk~ling Varianl)) Airplanes

condition ;L~: lisled ;Ibovt~, This proposed /\1) results /i-o.m mandatory continuing (linv()!1hir:Il:'.;s

__ .i

__ ~~. _ 

# ';iV' /1" 

# e llli'ol'matioll (MeAl) origin<1tcd by [Inaviation :.lulhorily of another coHlllry It) iClcniJii>- 

# f>t"'?lr;()'; "t;12- ' ~I", l and correct an unsaFc conc!ilji)ll 011an aViation pruduCI The IvlC/\1 descrihe:; Ille \ins;de 

### I. z..";;@

# y ",,,','",-""""1 

## ----[---- Sc.;vcneases oeon-ground hydraulic accumulator .~crC\Vcap or end Ci1r I;lilure have heen experienced on CL·600-2BJ ()(CR.J) airCl'i)J1, resulting in !()SSoflhe associated hydraulic system and high-energy impact danwge 10 ;ldjacen{ Sp;IClllS <lndstruclUrc. >j< -.;.. 

## * , .&fr-

'" 'i I ' 

## i,'v) 

## J~ I
;-;;;-_._- 

# t .

.

### _---
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form
10-Q of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: August 13, 2009 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                       |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23787]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


[Indian Gaming; Approval by Operation of Law Tribal-State Class 
III Gaming Compact Amendment Between the Stockbridge-Munsee Community 
and the State of Wisconsin

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval by operation of law the 
2024 Amendments to the Stockbridge-Munsee Community and the State of 
Wisconsin Gaming Compact of 1992, as Amended in 1998, 2003, and 2009 
governing the operation and regulation of class III gaming activities.

DATES: The Amendment takes effect on October 16, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#763f18121f171831171b1f181136141f1758111900"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85ccebe1ece4ebc2e4e8ecebe2c5e7ece4abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>; (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act of 1988, 25 
U.S.C. 2701 et seq., (IGRA) provides the Secretary of the Interior 
(Secretary) with 45 days to review and approve or disapprove the 
Tribal-State compact governing the conduct of Class III gaming activity 
on the Tribe's Indian lands. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8). If the Secretary 
does not approve or disapprove a Tribal-State compact within the 45 
days, IGRA provides the Tribal-State compact is considered to have been 
approved by the Secretary, but only to the extent the compact is 
consistent with IGRA. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(D). The IGRA also 
requires the Secretary to publish in the Federal Register notice of the 
approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class III 
gaming activities on Indian lands. See 25 U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(D). The 
Department's regulations at 25 CFR 293.4 require all compacts and 
amendments to be reviewed and approved by the Secretary prior to taking 
effect. The Secretary took no action on the 2024 Amendments to the 
Stockbridge-Munsee Community and the State of Wisconsin Gaming Compact 
of 1992, as Amended in 1998, 2003, and 2009 within the 45-day statutory 
review period. Therefore, the Compact is considered to have been 
approved, but only to the extent it is consistent with IGRA. See 25 
U.S.C. 2710(d)(8)(C).

Wizipan Garriott,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, Exercising by 
delegation the authority of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-23787 Filed 10-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### Gaber (Barbara), Respondent, vs. Balsiger and another, Appellants.

*May 18*

June *16, 1943.*

*J. G. McWilliams*of Janesville and *W. A. Loveland*of Monticello, for the appellants.

*Lamboley & Lamboley*of Monroe and *Stroud, Stebbins & Wingert*of Madison, for the respondent.

*By the Court.*— Motion to dismiss the appeal is granted.
#### Boehmke, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and another, Respondent.*

*October 15*

November *16, 1948.*

*612
      *A. W. Richter*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 costs, on January 18, 1949.

*613Hughes, J.

Appellant here contends that because the original award of the commission was based upon a “stipulation” and not a compromise, sec. 102.16 (1), Stats., applies and she is entitled to make application for additional compensation at any time before the six-year statute of limitations bars such action.

It appears that the trial court correctly held that her application to the commission after the original order of June 27, 1945, to make a further award based upon her method of calculation was such an application for additional compensation as is contemplated by sec. 102.16 (1), Stats., and that the order of February 11, 1946, was in effect an order denying such further application, which she had the duty of having reviewed within twenty days.

The trial court’s conclusion that this action was barred by failure to proceed in due time was correct.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

Broadfoot, J., took no part.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary C. Granoff, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    /s/ Gary C. Granoff ---------------------------------------------- GARY C. GRANOFF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  September 29, 2008
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Exchange Act and 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB
of Advant-e Corporation (the Company) for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the report), the undersigned, Jason K. Wadzinski, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1) The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 20, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Jason K. Wadzinski 
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Jason K. Wadzinski     
|                         |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 13.1    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Yantai Dahua Holdings, Company Limited (the Company) on Form 20-F/A for the period ending December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: June 6, 2007/s/ TANG YuxiangName:TANG YuxiangTitle:President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: June 6, 2007/s/ QU ShizhiName:QU ShizhiTitle:Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
# L_2012113EN.01001101.xml

| 25.4.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 113/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 113/11

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2012/212/CFSP

of 23 April 2012

amending Decision 2010/639/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Belarus

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/639/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 October 2010, the Council adopted Decision 2010/639/CFSP (1).

| (2) | It is necessary to include a derogation to the asset freeze in Decision 2010/639/CFSP in order to ensure that funds or economic resources can be released or be made available for the official purposes of diplomatic missions or consular posts or international organisations enjoying immunities in accordance with international law. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

It is necessary to include a derogation to the asset freeze in Decision 2010/639/CFSP in order to ensure that funds or economic resources can be released or be made available for the official purposes of diplomatic missions or consular posts or international organisations enjoying immunities in accordance with international law.

| (3) | Decision 2010/639/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2010/639/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 3(1) of Decision 2010/639/CFSP, the following point is added:

| "(e) | to be paid into or from an account of a diplomatic mission or consular post or an international organisation enjoying immunities in accordance with international law, in so far as such payments are intended to be used for official purposes of the diplomatic mission or consular post or international organisation.". |
| --- | --- |

"(e)

to be paid into or from an account of a diplomatic mission or consular post or an international organisation enjoying immunities in accordance with international law, in so far as such payments are intended to be used for official purposes of the diplomatic mission or consular post or international organisation.".

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 23 April 2012.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 280, 26.10.2010, p. 18.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3


         CERTIFICATE OF TRUST OF PRUDENTIAL FINANCIAL CAPITAL TRUST I
         ------------------------------------------------------------

     THIS Certificate of Trust of Prudential Financial Capital Trust I (the
"Trust") is being duly executed and filed by the undersigned, as trustees, to
form a business trust under the Delaware Business Trust Act (12 Del. C. ss. 3801
et seq.) (the "Act").                                           -------
-- ---

     1. Name. The name of the business trust formed hereby is Prudential
        ----
Financial Capital Trust I.

     2. Delaware Trustee. The name and business address of the trustee of the
        -------- -------
Trust in the State of Delaware is Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National
Association, 500 Stanton Christiana Road, Building 4 - 3rd Floor, Newark, DE
19713.

     3. Effective Date. This Certificate of Trust shall be effective upon
        --------------
filing.
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 4.3


         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Certificate in
accordance with Section 3811(a) of the Act.

                            THE CHASE MANHATTAN BANK

                            By: /s/ James P. Freeman
                               ------------------------
                             Name: James P. Freeman
                             Title: Vice President




                            CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION


                            By:  /s/ J. J. Cashin
                               ------------------------
                              Name: John J. Cashin
                              Title: Vice President



                            /s/ Tim Fetten
                            --------------------
                            Name: Timothy Fetten
                                as Administrative Trustee



                            /s/ Scott Kaplan
                            --------------------
                            Name: Scott Kaplan
                                as Administrative Trustee



                            /s/ Rich Vaccaro
                            -----------------------------
                            Name: Richard Vaccaro
                                as Administrative Trustee


                                      -2-
Exhibit 99.9

CONSENT OF ENGINEER

Ladies and
Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigneds name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled Technical Report on the Midwest Uranium Deposit Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Estimates, Saskatchewan, Canada dated June 1, 2005, as amended on
February 14, 2006, and (2) all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp.

Dated: March 30, 2017



|                              |  |               
|----------------------------- |  | --------------
|By:                           |  | /s/ Luke Evans
|Luke Evans, M.Sc., P.Eng.    
|Roscoe Postle Associates Inc.
#### ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS. ABRAHAM RESNICK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. REFORM TEMPLE OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTAPPELLANT, EAST BRUNSWICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, EAST BRUNSWICK BAPTIST CHURCH, NATIVITY EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH OF EAST BRUNSWICK, DEFENDANTS,

Superior Court of New Jersey Appellate Division

Argued November 1, 1976

Decided November 16, 1976.

Before Judges Bischoee, Moegan and Collesteb.

*Mr. Frank J. Rubin*argued the cause for Bast Brunswick Board of Education *(Messrs. Rubin <& Lerner,*attorneys).

*Mr. Samuel H. Davis*argued the cause for Reform Temple of East Brunswick *(Messrs. D'ubowsky & Davis,*attorneys).

*Mr. Seymour Gelzer*filed a brief and was permitted to argue the cause for East Brunswick Baptist Church, even though no notice of appeal was filed *(Messrs. Iaria,*and *Gel-zer,*attorneys).

*Mr. Sanford Rader*argued the cause for respondent *(Messrs. Eovacs, Anderson, Horowitz & Rader,*attorneys).

*475Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the trial court, reported at 135 *N. J. Super.*257.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-24-00054-CV

In re Michael Glenn Roller

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM WILLIAMSON COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N 

We dismiss as moot relator Michael Glenn Roller’s petition for writ of

mandamus, which raises the same arguments that Roller made in his previous petition for writ of 

mandamus that we denied today.

__________________________________________

Gisela D. Triana, Justice

Before Justices Baker, Triana, and Kelly

Filed: March 28, 2024