alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3075

To repeal the provisions of law that provide automatic pay adjustments

for Members of Congress, the Vice President, certain senior executive

officers, and Federal judges, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 20, 2000

Mr. FEINGOLD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To repeal the provisions of law that provide automatic pay

adjustments for Members of Congress, the Vice President, certain senior executive officers, and Federal

judges, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIMINATION OF AUTOMATIC PAY ADJUST4 MENTS FOR FEDERAL OFFICIALS.

5 (a) MEMBERS OF CONGRESS.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section

7 601(a) of the Legislative Reorganization Act of

8 1946 (2 U.S.C. 31) is repealed.
2

•S 3075 IS

1 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND2 MENTS.—Section 601(a)(1) of such Act is

3 amended—

4 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)(1)’’ and inserting

5 ‘‘(a)’’;

6 (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (A),

7 (B), and (C) as paragraphs (1), (2), and (3),

8 respectively; and

9 (C) by striking ‘‘as adjusted by paragraph

10 (2) of this subsection’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted

11 as provided by law’’.

12 (b) VICE PRESIDENT.—Section 104 of title 3, United

13 States Code, is amended—

14 (1) in subsection (a)—

15 (A) by striking ‘‘(a)’’;

16 (B) in the first sentence by striking ‘‘as

17 adjusted under this section’’ and inserting ‘‘ad18 justed as provided by law’’; and

19 (C) by striking the second and third sen20 tences; and

21 (2) by striking subsection (b).

22 (c) EXECUTIVE SCHEDULE POSITIONS.—

23 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 5318 of title 5,

24 United States Code, is repealed.
3

•S 3075 IS

1 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND2 MENTS.—

3 (A) The table of sections for chapter 53 of

4 title 5, United States Code, is amended by

5 striking the item relating to section 5318.

6 (B) Sections 5312, 5313, 5314, 5315, and

7 5316 of title 5, United States Code, are each

8 amended by striking ‘‘as adjusted by section

9 5318 of this title’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted as

10 provided by law’’.

11 (d) JUSTICES AND JUDGES.—

12 (1) IN GENERAL.—Section 461 of title 28,

13 United States Code, is repealed.

14 (2) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMEND15 MENTS.—

16 (A) The table of sections for chapter 21 of

17 title 28, United States Code, is amended by

18 striking the item relating to section 461.

19 (B) Sections 5, 44(d), 135, and 252 of

20 title 28, United States Code, are each amended

21 by striking ‘‘as adjusted by section 461 of this

22 title’’ and inserting ‘‘adjusted as provided by

23 law’’.

24 (C) Section 371(b)(2) of title 28, United

25 States Code, is amended in the second sentence
4

•S 3075 IS

1 by striking ‘‘under section 461 of this title’’ and

2 inserting ‘‘as provided by law’’.

3 (e) EFFECTIVE DATES.—This section shall take ef4 fect on February 1, 2001.

Æ
EXHIBIT 12.1



Alliance Laundry Holdings Inc



Earnings to Fixed Charges



|                                      |  |              |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |        |  
|------------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------ |  | - | ------ | -
|                                      |  | December 31, |       
|                                      |  | 2004         |        | 2003 |   | 2002   |  | 2001 |        | 2000 |  
|Earnings:                             |  |              |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |        |  
|Income before taxes                   |  |              | 11,836 |      |   | 15,974 |  |      | 1,391  |      |   | 2,764  |  |   | (4,581 | )
|Fixed charges:                        |  |              |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |        |  
|Interest expense                      |  |              | 25,439 |      |   | 28,258 |  |      | 28,341 |      |   | 33,538 |  |   | 35,947 |  
|Rentals                               |  |              | 441    |      |   | 360    |  |      | 337    |      |   | 363    |  |   | 663    |  
|                                      |  |              |        |      |   |        |  |      |        |      |   |        |  |   |        |  
|                                      |  |              | 37,716 |      |   | 44,592 |  |      | 30,069 |      |   | 36,665 |  |   | 32,029 |  
|Income before taxes and fixed charges |  | $            | 25,880 |      | $ | 28,618 |  | $    | 28,678 |      | $ | 33,901 |  | $ | 36,610 |  
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges    |  |              | 1.46   |      |   | 1.56   |  |      | 1.05   |      |   | 1.08   |  |   |       |  



(a) For purposes of determining the
ratio of earnings to fixed charges, earnings are defined as income (loss) before income taxes and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle plus fixed charges. Fixed charges include interest expense on all indebtedness, amortization of
deferred financing costs and one-third of rental expense on operating leases, representing that portion of rental expense deemed to be attributable to interest. In 2000, earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges. The amount of earnings
required to attain a ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 is $4.6 million.
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  in  connection  with the  filing of the  Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter  Ended  November 30, 2008 (the  "Report") by
Progressive  Training,  Inc.  ("Registrant"),  the undersigned  hereby certifies
that:

1.       to the  best of my  knowledge,  the  Report  fully  complies  with  the
         requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

2.       to the best of my knowledge,  the  information  contained in the Report
         fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and
         results of operations of Registrant.

December 19, 2008                    By:  /S/ BUDDY YOUNG
                                         ---------------------------------
                                         Buddy Young
                                         Chief Executive Officer and Chief
                                         Financial Officer
S. 3022

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain irrigation facilities to

the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Nampa and Meridian Conveyance

Act’’.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FACILITIES.

The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred to as the

‘‘Secretary’’) shall, as soon as practicable after the date of enactment

of this Act, convey facilities to the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation

District (in this Act referred to as the ‘‘District’’) in accordance

with all applicable laws and pursuant to the terms of the Memorandum of Agreement (contract No. 1425–99MA102500, dated 7

July 1999) between the Secretary and the District. The conveyance

of facilities shall include all right, title, and interest of the United

States in and to any portion of the canals, laterals, drains, and

any other portion of the water distribution and drainage system

that is operated or maintained by the District for delivery of water

to and drainage of water from lands within the boundaries of

the District.

SEC. 3. LIABILITY.

Except as otherwise provided by law, effective on the date

of conveyance of facilities under this Act, the United States shall

not be liable for damages of any kind arising out of any act,

omission, or occurrence based on its prior ownership or operation

of the conveyed property.
S. 3022—2

SEC. 4. EXISTING RIGHTS NOT AFFECTED.

Nothing in this Act affects the rights of any person except

as provided in this Act. No water rights shall be transferred, modified, or otherwise affected by the conveyance of facilities and

interests to the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District under

this Act. Such conveyance shall not affect or abrogate any provision

of any contract executed by the United States or State law regarding

any irrigation district’s right to use water developed in the facilities

conveyed.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commodity Futures Trading Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

9 a.m. EDT, Friday, September 25, 2024.

# PLACE: 

Virtual meeting.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

                        Enforcement matters. In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.cftc.gov/​.*

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-5964.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: October 16, 2024.

Robert Sidman,

Deputy Secretary of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2024-24314 Filed 10-16-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 No. 333-69024 and No. 333-101614) pertaining to the
Information Holdings Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan of our report dated February 14, 2003 (except for Note 18, as to which the date is February 28, 2003) with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Information Holdings Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.



New
York, New York
March 24, 2003

---

QuickLinks
ACTIO N 

## S I 0-100304-05 4 GUA M CHAMBE R O F COMMERC E PARTNER S I N PROGRES S CONTRO L NO .

Februar y 18 , 201 0

o TH E HONORABL E RAY LAHOO D Secretary Unite dState s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 New Jerse y Avenue , S E Washington , D.C . 2059 0 Subject : Haned aCombinatio n Service s Allocatio n Proceedin g DOT-OST-2010-001 8 Dear Secretary LaHood ; O n behal f o f th e Boar do f

Director s an dMembershi p o f th e GuamChambe r

of Commerce , 1 writ e t o support th e applicatio n of

U.S . carrier s t o provid e dail y nonsto p servic e betwee n Gua man dToky o Haned aairport . Th e Chambe r applaud s th e effort s o f

you r offic e in securin g th e ope n skie s agreemen t wit h Japan . Guam' s econom y depend s heavil y upo n touris t traffi c fro mpoint s acros s th e Asian region , with Japa n bein g acritica l touris t

marke t fo r ou r island . Touris mrepresent s 35 % of Guam' s Gros s Islan dProduc t an d th e additio n o

f th e Toky o Haned arout e woul db e instrumenta l in stimulatin g mor e job s fo r ou r island . Haned aairport

i s ideall y situate dfor

th e Japanes e touris t

an dbusinessma n wh o liv e i n central , southern an dwestern Tokyo , an dobtainin g U.S . carrie r schedule dservic e t o an dfro mHaned awil l b e apositiv e impac t o n Guam' s economy . W e understan dthat

fiv e U.S . carrier s ar e intereste di n th e opportunit y t o servic e Haneda . W e urg e yo u t o conside r th e carrie r

wh o wil l provid e ai r

servic e connectin g Gua mwit h Tokyo' s downtow n Haned a airport Continenta l Airiine s an dit s subsidiary . Continenta l Micronesia , i s seekin g approva l t o gamacces s fo r thi s service . Continenta l i s th e onl y carrie r operatin g ahu b o n Guam . Commumtie s in Micronesia , includin g th e CNMI , Pala u an dth e FS M wil l als o benefi t fro mth e one-sto p connectio n at Guams internationa l airport

t o Haneda . W e believ e tha t

thi s ne w servic e i s critica l t o th e futur e growt h o f ou r islan dan dth e region . Than k yo u fo r you r consideratio n of

ou r comments . Sincfitelyr

- sincf i DAVI D J . J O Chairma n o f

17< l A^ninal l Avenu e • Suit e 101 , Ad aPlaz aCenter , Hagitn a• P.O . Bo x 283 , HagJtna , G U 9693 2 Tel . (671 ) 472-63U/8 X FtT(671 ) 472"1o 2 • ' http://www.guamchlber.com.g u • tmail : gchamber@guamchamber.com.g u
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-15-0150 SAT Date: 1/16/2015 Print Date: 2/3/2015

Related cases : CBI : Yes

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 2

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 12

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: AQUATOX; IRRIT-S,E
Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-15-0150 FATE: Liquid with MP < -60 °C (M) log Kow = 4.07 (E) S = 24.3 mg/L at 25 °C (E) VP = 2.41-3 torr at 25 °C (E) BP = 296 °C (E) H = 2.56E-7 (E) log Koc = 2.54 (E) log Fish BCF = 2.36 (E) log Fish BAF = 1.18 (E)POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption and biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = slow - moderate

Health : Health Summary: Moderate absorption all routes since PMN substance is , expect hydrolysis of both groups. There is concern for skin and eye irritation based on Test Data: Submitted with (-) Salmonella with and without activation, (-) E. coli with and without activation, (-) chromosome aberrations in CHL cells with and without activation.
Submitted with : Rat oral LD0 > 2000 mg/kg; Rabbit dermal LD0 > 2000 mg/kg; mild eye irritant in rabbits; skin irritant in rabbits; N ot a skin sensitizer in guinea pigs ( Oral developmental toxicity study in rats: no repression of genes that would indicate testicular dysgenesis as seen with

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 2.1 daphnid 48-h LC50 3.5 green algal 96-h EC50 1.1 fish

_ chronic value 0.103 daphnid

_ chronic value 1.3
algal

_ chronic value 0.54
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on ; liquid with mp <10 C (M); log Kow = 4.2 (P), 3.5 (M); S = 84 mg/L at 20 C (M); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 10

SARsSAR Class Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: D. Pagan-Rodriguez
EXHIBIT 99.4
                      [McGladrey & Pullen, LLP letterhead]




                          INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT


To the Board of Directors
AF Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries
West Jefferson, North Carolina

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statement of financial condition
of AF Bankshares, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and the related
consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the
year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted
in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the financial position of AF Bankshares, Inc. and
Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for the year then ended, in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.


/s/ McGLADREY & PULLEN, LLP


Charlotte, North Carolina

August 3, 2001
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

CARLOS E. ROBINSON

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 0911

[ July 19, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying 3.850 motion f rom the Circuit Court for the

Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; John S. Kastrenakes

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502008CF011591A XXXMB

.

Michael Hursey of Michael Hursey, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

W ARNER

, D AMOORGIAN and K UNT Z , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### The State v. Wright.

1. Criminal Evidence: death of witness: hearsay. Where on the trial of a criminal case the state sought to prove what a certain witness stated in his testimony on the preliminary examination, on the ground that the witness had died in the meantime, *held*that such alleged death could not be established by the testimony of one witness who only heard that he was dead, and of another who had only so heard, and who further testified that such was the general report. (Compare *Ross v. Loomis,*64 Iowa, 432.)

*Appeal from Sao District Court.*

Wednesday, December 1.

Indictment for obtaining money under false pretenses. Trial by jury, who, under the direction of the court, found the defendant not guilty, and the state appeals.

*J. W. Cory, District-attorney,*for the State.

No appearance for defendant.

*153Seevees, J.

The record warrants the assumption that the evidence of one Webster was material, and without it there could no* be a conviction. Webster had testified as a witness on the preliminary examination of the defendant before a magistrate. The state claims that Webster died on the eighteenth day of February, 1885. This trial was commenced on the twentieth day of said month, and the state sought to prove, by a competent witness, what Webster testified to on such examination. To enable this to be done, the st,ate sought to establish the fact that Webster was dead; and one witness on the part of the state testified that he was, but that all he knew about it was that he had so heard. Another witness testified that he had so heard, and that such was the general report. The foregoing evidence was rejected by the court, and, in so ruling, it is insisted that the court erred. It is claimed by the state that the death of a person may be established by hearsay evidence. Possibly this is so in some cases; but the evidence offered for the purpose of establishing the death of Webster is not nearly so satisfactory as the evidence in *Ross v. Loomis,*64 Iowa, 432; and, following that case, we must hold that the district court did not err.

It is true, it is insisted by the state that the sufficiency of the evidence was for the jury. This is so; but the admissibility and competency of evidence to establish any proposition must be determined by the court.

Aefibhed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83919-83920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24020]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

[[Page 83920]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 432 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-17, K2025-17.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24020 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1 -  Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the
quarter ended December 31, 2009 and filed with the U. S. Securities and
Exchange Commission ("Form 10-Q/A").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my knowledge,
the amended Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the amended Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


   /s/ T J Jesky
----------------------------------
       T J Jesky
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer



Date  May 25, 2010
      ------------