alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ENACTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Carol E. Cotton, Senior Vice-President of Millar Western
Forest Products Ltd. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as enacted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:

(i) the Company's annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

Dated: March 5, 2014

/s/ Carol E.
CottonCarol E. Cotton Senior Vice-President

---
#### A. A. McKEITHAN *v.*H. *G.*TERRY.

Specific Hens previously obtained (as, *here,*by levy) are not divested by the provision for a Homestead in the Constitution :

*Therefore,*where a levy upon land was made in December 1867, and,, lipona *Ven. Ex.,*issued in 1869, the Sheriff returned “no goods, chattels, lands or tenements, to be found in my County, over the Homestead,”

*Held,*that he was Hable to be amerced for an insufficient return.

*(Hill v. Kessler,*63 N. C. Rep., 437, cited and approved.)

Motion to amerce a Sheriff, made before Buxton, *J.,*at' Spring Term 1869, of Cumberland Court.

The facts were, that the plaintiff at Spring Term 1867,. had obtained judgment against one McLeod, and that a *fi. fa,*issuing thereupon, had, on the 27th day of December 1867, been duly levied by the Sheriff of Eichmond upon certain lands. In February 1869, a *ven. ex.*issued, to sell the land, and upon it the Sheriff returned, “ no goods, chattels, lands or tenements to he found in my County, over the Homestead.”

His Honor declined to grant the order, and the plaintiff' appealed.

*Umsdale,*for the appellant.

1. The Homestead provision cannot affect a specific lien, which constitutes a vested right. *Hawthorne*v. *Oalef*2, *26Wall, 10; *Bronson*v. *Kinsie,*1 How., 311; 8 Sm. and Mars. 9.

2. The *return*here, therefore, is within the provisions of Bev. Code, c. 105, § 17. *Li/ndsay*v. *Rowland,*5 Ire., 385; *BueMey*v. *Hamilton,*1 Ire., 322.

*W. MgL. McKay, contra.*

Beade, J.

The State Constitution provides for the exemption of a Homestead worth $1000, and of personal property worth $500, from execution sale for debt. We have decided that this exemption applies to debts existing before the adoption of the Constitution. *Hill*v. *Kessler,*63 N. C. Rep. 437.

But in the case under consideration the execution was levied before the adoption of the Constitution: there was, therefore, a specific lien, a vested right, which it was not the purpose of the Constitution to destroy, if indeed it had the power. Mere indebtedness is not a lien upon any property, nor does the homestead destroy the creditor’s -property in the claim, and therefore does not *necessarily*impair the ob-' ligation of the contract. But it is otherwise where the creditor has acquired a specific lien, as in the case under consideration. It was the duty of the Sheriff, under the *ven. ex.*in his hands, to sell the land which had been levied on, and return the money into Court; and his return of “no goods and chattels, &c., over the homestead” was not a “due return,” and he was therefore hable to amercement.

It was error in His Honor to refuse the rule moved for by the plaintiff.

This will be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment reversed.
Exhibit 32.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dean E. Miller, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

          1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.

/s/ Dean E. Miller
-------------------

Dean E. Miller
Chief Financial Officer
March 15, 2006

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906
has been provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish
Re Group Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeshare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Frederick Henry Conte, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






January
                31, 2008
            
            /s/ *Frederick
              Henry Conte*Frederick
                Henry ConteChief
                Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 329

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility for hospital

care and medical services under chapter 17 of that title to veterans

who have been awarded the Purple Heart, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 28, 1999

Mr. ROBB introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 38, United States Code, to extend eligibility

for hospital care and medical services under chapter 17

of that title to veterans who have been awarded the

Purple Heart, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. ELIGIBILITY FOR HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDI4 CAL SERVICES BASED ON AWARD OF PURPLE

5 HEART.

6 (a) ELIGIBILITY.—Section 1710(a)(2) of title 38,

7 United States Code, is amended—
2

•S 329 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of subparagraph

2 (F);

3 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (G) as sub4 paragraph (H); and

5 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (F) the fol6 lowing new subparagraph (G):

7 ‘‘(G) who has been awarded the Purple Heart;

8 or’’.

9 (b) ENROLLMENT PRIORITY.—Section 1705(a)(3) of

10 such title is amended—

11 (1) by striking ‘‘and veterans’’ and inserting

12 ‘‘veterans’’; and

13 (2) by inserting ‘‘, and veterans whose eligibility

14 for care and services under this chapter is based

15 solely on the award of the Purple Heart’’ before the

16 period at the end.

17 (c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—(1) Section

18 1722(a) of such title is amended by striking ‘‘section

19 1710(a)(2)(G)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 1710(a)(2)(H)’’.

20 (2) Section 5317(c)(3) of such title is amended by

21 striking ‘‘subsections (a)(2)(G),’’ and inserting ‘‘sub22 sections (a)(2)(H),’’.

Æ
Exhibit 10.1
 DemandTec, Inc.  One Circle Star Way  San Carlos, CA 94070
  
   Termination Date
 Effective Date and Revocation
 Salary and Vacation Pay
 Severance Pay




---



##### 



COBRA Premiums
 Options
 Exercise Price
    
    Total Number
    
    Vested Number of SharesDate of Grant
    
    per Share
    
    of Shares
    
    as of Termination DateDecember 13, 2003
    
    $
    1.00
    
    
    
    216,800
    
    
    
    216,800March 20, 2004
    
    $
    1.00
    
    
    
    25,000
    
    
    
    25,000February 12, 2005
    
    $
    1.30
    
    
    
    12,500
    
    
    
    9,635
  Performance Stock Units




---



##### 



Regular Stock Units
 Release of All Claims
 Notwithstanding the extent of the foregoing release, the Companys existing obligations, if
any, to indemnify you for claims against you arising out of the course and scope of your employment
at the Company will be preserved.
 Waiver
 No Admission
 Other Agreements




---



##### 



Duty to Cooperate
 Company Property
 Confidentiality of Agreement
 No Disparagement
 Severability
 Choice of Law




---



##### 



Execution
  Very truly yours,DemandTec, Inc.By:
    /s/ Mark A. CulhaneTitle:
    EVP and CFO  /s/ John C. CrouchSignature of John C. CrouchDated:
    6/9/2008 Attachment
`[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 439 Reported in Senate (RS)]






                                                       Calendar No. 361
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 439

                          [Report No. 106-205]

To amend the National Forest and Public Lands of Nevada Enhancement Act 
 of 1988 to adjust the boundary of the Toiyabe National Forest, Nevada.


_______________________________________________________________________


                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 22, 1999

  Mr. Bryan (for himself and Mr. Reid) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

                            November 2, 1999

              Reported by Mr. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL


 
To amend the National Forest and Public Lands of Nevada Enhancement Act 
 of 1988 to adjust the boundary of the Toiyabe National Forest, Nevada.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADJUSTMENT OF BOUNDARY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST, 
              NEVADA.

    Section 4(a) of the National Forest and Public Lands of Nevada 
Enhancement Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 2750) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Effective'' and inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--Effective''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Boundary adjustment.--Effective on the date of 
        enactment of this paragraph, the portion of the land 
        transferred to the Secretary of Agriculture under paragraph (1) 
        situated between the lines marked `Old Forest Boundary' and 
        `Revised National Forest Boundary' on the map entitled `Nevada 
        Interchange ``A'', Change 1', and dated September 16, 1998, is 
        transferred to the Secretary of the Interior.''.
                                     





                                                       Calendar No. 361

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 439

                          [Report No. 106-205]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the National Forest and Public Lands of Nevada Enhancement Act 
 of 1988 to adjust the boundary of the Toiyabe National Forest, Nevada.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            November 2, 1999

                       Reported without amendment`
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk January 27, 2009

d0120 

# Order

January 27, 2009

137450

JEFFREY J. SETTECERRI, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 137450 COA: 284162 Macomb CC: 03-000121-DM CYNTHIA A. SETTECERRI, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the August 27, 2008 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 435 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-22, K2025-21.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24023 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LaPorte Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |                                                     
|------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|May 10, 2011 |  | /s/ Lee A. Brady                                    
|Date         |  | Lee A. Brady                                        
|             |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|             |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                               
|             | 
|May 10, 2011 |  | /s/ Michele M. Thompson                             
|Date         |  | Michele M. Thompson                                 
|             |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|             |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                               

This certification
accompanies each report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



47
AASHTO Subcommittee on Materials

Seek to protect the ability to use Fly Ash in highway construction

August 2009

WHEREAS, AASHTO has observed the spring 2009 EPA regulatory agenda plans to 

issue a propose ruling regarding certain uses of coal waste, with intent to apply to

landfill and surface impoundment facilities.

WHEREAS, Fly Ash is a coal combustion byproduct commonly used in highway 

construction applications such as bridges, pavements, and subgrades, and could 

potentially be designated as “hazardous waste” for disposal purposes with exception for 

certain beneficial uses under the proposed ruling; and

WHEREAS, Even if EPA’s proposed ruling allows for the beneficial use of Fly Ash, the 

stigma associated with using a “hazardous waste” material could effectively eliminate 

the use of Fly Ash in highway construction; and

WHEREAS, The May 2000 Federal register notice states “We support increases in 

these beneficial uses, such as for additions to cement and concrete products”; and

WHEREAS, The benefits of using Fly Ash in concrete to improve durability, ultimate 

compressive and flexural strengths, reduce permeability, and mitigation of Alkali silica 

reactivity, will no longer be an option for state DOT’s; and

WHEREAS, The use of Fly Ash in highway construction measurably reduces 

greenhouse gas emissions through the reduced consumption of Portland cement; and

WHEREAS, The use of Fly Ash in highway construction promotes recycling of a 

byproduct that would otherwise require disposal; and

WHEREAS, Fly Ash has been used in highway construction for many years without 

documented adverse environmental impacts, no research exists which conclusively 

provides a scientific argument to designate Fly Ash as “hazardous waste”.

THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the AASHTO Subcommittee on Materials take 

action to notify the EPA of the adverse impact this proposed ruling would have on the 

nation’s infrastructure; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the AASHTO Subcommittee on Materials seeks to 

protect the use Fly Ash in highway construction and is against any proposed ruling that 

would impede its use for those purposes.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3270

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide for a modification

of medicare billing requirements for certain Indian providers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

NOVEMBER 14 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. HATCH (for himself, and Mr. CAMPBELL) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to provide

for a modification of medicare billing requirements for

certain Indian providers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MODIFICATION OF MEDICARE BILLING RE4 QUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN INDIAN PRO5 VIDERS.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1880(a) of the Social Se7 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395qq(a)) is amended by adding

8 at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘A hospital or a

9 freestanding ambulatory care clinic (as defined by the Sec10 retary), whether operated by the Indian Health Service or
2

•S 3270 IS

1 by an Indian tribe or tribal organization (as those terms

2 are defined in section 4 of the Indian Health Care Im3 provement Act), shall be eligible for payments for services

4 for which payment is made pursuant to section 1848, not5 withstanding sections 1814(c) and 1835(d), if and for so

6 long as it meets all of the requirements that are applicable

7 generally to such payments, services, hospitals, and clin8 ics.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to services furnished on or after

11 January 1, 2001.

Æ
Exhibit 24.1
 POWER OF ATTORNEY
    /s/ Jonathan Bloomer
    
    
    
    /s/ Jeffrey HughesJonathan Bloomer
    
    
    
    Jeffery Hughes/s/ Raymond Wechsler
    
    
    
    /s/ Robert JoyalRaymond Wechsler
    
    
    
    Robert Joyal/s/ James Butler
    
    
    
    /s/ Larry PortJames Butler
    
    
    
    Larry Port/s/ James Chapman
    
    
    
    /s/ Michael RollingsJames Chapman
    
    
    
    Michael Rollings/s/ Thomas Finke
    
    
    
    /s/ George ZippelThomas Finke
    
    
    
    George Zippel/s/ Seth GardnerSeth Gardner
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: September 28, 2010/s/ Michael R. Feinsod
Michael Feinsod
Acting Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary C. Granoff, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



----------------------------------------------
GARY C. GRANOFF
PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

September 28, 2005