---

---

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549

---

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

|ý | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2002.
|- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

OR

|o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
 to
|- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Commission file number:0-24360

---

SPECTRIAN CORPORATION(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE

77-0023003(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)


350 West Java Drive
Sunnyvale, California 94089(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Telephone Number (408) 745-5400(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

---

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý    No o

As
of August 8, 2002 there were 11,475,468 shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding.

---

---

---



SPECTRIAN CORPORATION        FORM 10-Q        INDEX        FOR QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

|                             |  |                                                                                                   |  | Page
|---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
|ITEM 1.                      |  | Financial Statements                                                                              |  |     
|                             |  | Condensed Consolidated Balance SheetsJune 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002                            |  | 3   
|                             |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements Of OperationsThree Months Ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001 |  | 4   
|                             |  | Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsThree Months Ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001 |  | 5   
|                             |  | Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements                                              |  | 6   
|ITEM 2.                      |  | Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations             |  | 15  
|ITEM 3.                      |  | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk                                        |  | 37  
|PART IIOTHER INFORMATION   
|ITEM 1.                      |  | Legal Proceedings                                                                                 |  | 39  
|ITEM 5.                      |  | Other Information                                                                                 |  | 39  
|ITEM 6.                      |  | Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                                                                  |  | 39  
|Signatures                   |  | 41                                                                                               

2

---



PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SPECTRIAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(In thousands, except share data)  (Unaudited)

|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 | June 30,
2002                              |       | March 31,
2002(1) |        
|------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | ----- | ----------------- | -------
|ASSETS                               |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|CURRENT ASSETS:                      |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     | Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                                                       |                                            | $     | 35,233            |        
|                                     | Short-term investments                                                                                                                                                          |                                            |       | 46,591            |        
|                                     | Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $400 and $400, respectively                                                                                        |                                            |       | 13,829            |        
|                                     | Inventories                                                                                                                                                                     |                                            |       | 26,538            |        
|                                     | Income tax receivable                                                                                                                                                           |                                            |       | 1,305             |        
|                                     | Prepaid expenses and other current assets                                                                                                                                       |                                            |       | 4,171             |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 | Total current assets                       |       |                   | 127,667
|Property and equipment, net          |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            | 9,785 |                   |        
|Other assets                         |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            | 2,973 |                   |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 | Total assets                               |       | $                 | 140,425
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|CURRENT LIABILITIES:                 |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     | Accounts payable                                                                                                                                                                |                                            | $     | 13,691            |        
|                                     | Accrued liabilities                                                                                                                                                             |                                            |       | 12,630            |        
|                                     | Income taxes payable                                                                                                                                                            |                                            |       | 343               |        
|                                     | Deferred gain, current portion                                                                                                                                                  |                                            |       | 16,250            |        
|                                     | Current portion of debt and capital lease obligations                                                                                                                           |                                            |       | 34                |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 | Total current liabilities                  |       |                   | 42,948 
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|Commitments (Note 12)                |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     | STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:                                                                                                                                                           |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     | Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding, respectively                                                                       |                                            |       |                  |        
|                                     | Common stock, $0.001 par value, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 12,769,168 and 12,691,423 shares issued, respectively; 11,475,468 and 11,397,723 shares outstanding, respectively |                                            |       | 13                |        
|                                     | Additional paid-in capital                                                                                                                                                      |                                            |       | 170,157           |        
|                                     | Treasury stock, 1,293,700 shares of common stock held                                                                                                                           |                                            |       | (17,669           | )      
|                                     | Deferred compensation expense                                                                                                                                                   |                                            |       | (33               | )      
|                                     | Accumulated other comprehensive gain                                                                                                                                            |                                            |       | 263               |        
|                                     | Accumulated deficit                                                                                                                                                             |                                            |       | (55,254           | )      
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 | Total stockholders' equity                 |       |                   | 97,477 
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 | Total liabilities and stockholders' equity |       | $                 | 140,425
|                                     |                                                                                                                                                                                 |                                            |       |                   |        

---

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

---



SPECTRIAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(In thousands, except per share data)  (Unaudited)

|                                                                         |                                                                                             | Three Months Ended       |       
|------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------ | ------
|
|REVENUES                                                                 |                                                                                             | $                        | 18,816
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|COSTS AND EXPENSES:                                                      |                                                                                             |                          |       
|                                                                         | Cost of revenues                                                                            |                          |       
|                                                                         | Research and development                                                                    |                          |       
|                                                                         | Selling, general and administrative                                                         |                          |       
|                                                                         | Restructuring costs                                                                         |                          |       
|                                                                         | Costs related to proposed acquisition by REMEC, Inc.                                        |                          |       
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|                                                                         |                                                                                             | Total costs and expenses |       
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|OPERATING LOSS                                                           |                                                                                             |                          | (8,999
|INTEREST INCOME                                                          |                                                                                             |                          | 668   
|INTEREST EXPENSE                                                         |                                                                                             |                          | (1    
|OTHER INCOME, NET                                                        |                                                                                             |                          | 4,801 
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES                                                 |                                                                                             |                          | (3,531
|INCOME TAXES                                                             |                                                                                             |                          | 29    
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|LOSS BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE          |                                                                                             |                          | (3,560
|CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLEADOPTION OF SFAS 133 |                                                                                             |                          |      
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|NET LOSS                                                                 |                                                                                             | $                        | (3,560
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|NET LOSS PER SHARE:                                                      |                                                                                             |                          |       
|                                                                         | Basic and diluted loss per share before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |                          | $     
|                                                                         | Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle                                         |                          |       
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|                                                                         | Basic and diluted net loss per share                                                        |                          | $     
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       
|SHARES USED IN COMPUTING PER SHARE AMOUNTS:                              |                                                                                             |                          |       
|                                                                         | Basic and diluted                                                                           |                          |       
|                                                                         |                                                                                             |                          |       

See
accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

---



SPECTRIAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(In thousands)  (Unaudited)

|                                                     |                                                                             | Three Months Ended                                                     |                                  
|---------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------
|
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Net loss                                                                    |                                                                        | $                                
|                                                     | Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle                    |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Depreciation and amortization                                          |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Provision for excess and obsolete inventories and write-down to market |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Gain on the sale of UltraRF                                            |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Net loss on short-term investments                                     |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Loss on sale and write-off of property and equipment, net              |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Stock option compensation expense                                      |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Increase (decrease) in income tax payable                              |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             | Changes in operating assets and liabilities:                           |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        | Accounts receivable              
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        | Inventories                      
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        | Prepaid expenses and other assets
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        | Accounts payable                 
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        | Accrued liabilities              
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Purchase of short-term investments                                          |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments                          |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Proceeds from sale of short-term investments                                |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Release of restricted cash                                                  |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Purchase of property and equipment                                          |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Repayment of debt and capital lease obligations                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Proceeds from sales of common stock, net                                    |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |                                                                             |                                                                        | (6,907                           
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD       |                                                                             |                                                                        | 42,140                           
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD             |                                                                             | $                                                                      | 35,233                           
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:    |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Cash paid for interest                                                      |                                                                        | $                                
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Cash paid for income taxes                                                  |                                                                        | $                                
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  
|                                                     | Acquisition of equipment under capital lease obligations                    |                                                                        | $                                
|                                                     |                                                                             |                                                                        |                                  

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

---



SPECTRIAN CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES  NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  (Unaudited)

1.    BASIS OF PRESENTATION



The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Spectrian Corporation and subsidiaries ("Spectrian" or the "Company") have been prepared
in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. However, certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the statements include all
adjustments (which are of a normal and recurring nature) necessary for the fair presentation of the financial information set forth therein. These financial statements should be read in conjunction
with the Company's audited consolidated financial statements as set forth on pages F-1 through F-33 of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002 ("fiscal
2002"). The interim results presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2003 ("fiscal 2003"), or any
other future period.

2.    PROPOSED MERGER WITH REMEC, INC.

On May 19, 2002, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the "Merger Agreement") by and among REMEC, Inc., a California
corporation ("REMEC"), Reef Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of REMEC ("Merger Sub")
and the Company pursuant to which REMEC will acquire the Company by a merger of Merger Sub with the Company ("the merger"). Upon consummation of the merger, the Company's stockholders will receive
approximately $14.00 of REMEC common stock, subject to a collar, or if REMEC chooses, a combination of REMEC common stock and cash. If REMEC elects to pay in cash, it may pay up to $4.00 per share in
cash. The remaining payment will be in REMEC common stock, which will be determined based on the average trading price of REMEC common stock for the ten day period ending on the second trading day
before the Company's special meeting of stockholders to approve the merger and the Merger Agreement. Spectrian stockholders will also receive cash for any fractional shares of REMEC common stock that
they are entitled to receive in the merger.

The
parties intend for the merger to be considered a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the REMEC common stock issued to the Company's stockholders.
The Merger Agreement has been approved unanimously by the board of directors of both companies. The merger is expected to close in the quarter ending September 30, 2002 but is subject to a number of
conditions including, among other things, approval by the Company's stockholders, approval by REMEC's shareholders and various regulatory approvals and clearances, including those under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended. In the event the Company fails to close the proposed merger due to the occurrence of certain events, the Company shall be required to pay REMEC a termination fee of
$6.0 million.

3.    SALE OF ULTRARF

On December 29, 2000, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets and liabilities comprising the Company's semiconductor division, UltraRF,
pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of November 20, 2000 (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") among Cree, Inc. ("Cree"), Zoltar Acquisition, Inc. ("Zoltar") and the Company for 1,815,402
shares of Cree common stock then valued at $64.5 million, based upon the closing price on the date of closing, plus Cree

6

---

common stock with a guaranteed realizable value of $30 million, less $1.1 million owed by the Company to Cree due to a change in the value of net assets of UltraRF between October 1, 2000 and
December 29, 2000.

As
part of the definitive agreement, the Company and Cree entered into a two-year supply agreement under which the Company is obligated to purchase from Cree an aggregate of $58.0
million of semiconductors (the "Purchase and Supply Agreement"). The Purchase and Supply Agreement was amended in October 2001 and April 2002. Total purchase commitment under the amended Purchase and
Supply Agreement was reduced by $3.2 million to $54.8 million and the agreement term was extended to June 30, 2003. In the event Spectrian fails to make these purchases, it is obligated to pay Cree
the amount of the shortfall. Accordingly, the Company deferred $58 million of the gain on sale of UltraRF, which was the amount of purchase commitment in the original Purchase and Supply Agreement,
and is recognizing the gain in periods as the related purchase commitments to Cree are being fulfilled. The Company also subleased one of the facilities in Sunnyvale, California to Cree for a term of
11 years (with three options to extend the lease an additional five years) with similar terms as the lease agreement between the Company and its landlord.

The
Company realized an aggregate gain of $69.7 million from the sale of UltraRF, of which $58.0 million was deferred as noted above, with the balance of $11.7 million being recognized
as other income during the three months ended December 31, 2000. The Company recognized a gain of $5.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and $7.5 million during the three months
ended July 1, 2001 as other income as the related commitment was fulfilled by the Company. As of June 30, 2002, the remaining purchase commitment is $16.3 million. The quarterly purchase commitment is
$5.0 million for the quarters ended September 29, 2002, December 29, 2002 and March 31, 2003 and $1.3 million for the quarter ended June 29, 2003.

4.    OTHER INCOME, NET

Other income, net included (in thousands):

Three Months EndedJune 30,
2002

July 1,
2001Gain on sale of UltraRF

$
5,000

$
7,500Net loss on Cree, Inc. common stock and common stock options





(2,346
)Other


(199
)

Other income, net

$
4,801

$
5,154


7

---

5.    BALANCE SHEET COMPONENTS

Balance sheet components are as follows (in thousands):

June 30,
2002

March 31,
2002Inventories:Raw materials

$
14,842

$
15,932Work in progress


3,669


3,539Finished goods


8,027


7,450Consigned inventory





672$
26,538

$
27,593


Property and equipment:Machinery and equipment

$
42,606

$
41,979Software


3,801


3,725Leasehold improvements


2,024


2,02448,431


47,728Less accumulated depreciation and amortization


38,646


38,077$
9,785

$
9,651Accrued liabilities:Employee compensation and benefits

$
2,844

$
2,900Warranty


6,100


6,400Restructuring





161Adverse purchase commitments


1,349


2,754Other accrued liabilities


2,337


1,994$
12,630

$
14,209


6.    RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 ("SFAS 142"), "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets", which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. In addition, the standard
includes provisions upon adoption for the reclassification of certain existing recognized intangibles as goodwill, reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles, reclassification
of certain intangibles out of previously reported goodwill and the testing for impairment of existing goodwill and other intangibles. The Company adopted SFAS 142 on April 1, 2002. The adoption of
SFAS 142 did not have a significant impact on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

In
October 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 ("SFAS 144"), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," which is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal periods. This Statement supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of" and Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"), "Reporting Results of OperationsReporting the Effects of Disposal of a
Division of a Business", however, this Statement retains the requirement of APB 30 to report discontinued operations separately from continuing operations and extends that reporting to a component of
an

8

---

entity that either has been disposed of (by sale, by abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for
the impairment of certain long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. The Company adopted SFAS 144 on April 1, 2002 and the adoption did not have a significant impact on its
financial position and results of operations.

In
June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities"' ("SFAS 146"). SFAS 146 addresses significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and
reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for under EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain
Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The scope of SFAS 146 also includes costs related to terminating a contract
that is not a capital lease and termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing benefit
arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. SFAS 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002 and early application is encouraged.
The Company will adopt SFAS 146 during the fourth quarter ending March 31, 2003. The provisions of EITF No. 94-3 shall continue to apply for an exit activity initiated under an exit plan that met the
criteria of EITF No. 94-3 prior to the adoption of SFAS 146. The effect on adoption of SFAS 146 will change on a prospective basis the timing of when restructuring charges are recorded from a
commitment date approach to when the liability is incurred.

7.    SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS

The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. As of June 30, 2002, the cash equivalents
consisted of commercial paper and U.S. government securities.

The
Company classifies its investments in certain debt securities as "available-for-sale," and records such investments at fair market value, with unrealized gains and losses reported as
a separate component of stockholders' equity. Realized gains and losses are determined using the specific identification method. Interest income is recorded using an effective interest rate with the
associated premium or discount amortized to interest income.

9

---

As
of June 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002, short-term investments classified as available-for-sale securities were as follows (in thousands):

|As of June 30, 2002                                                     |                  | Amortized
Cost |        | Unrealized
Gain |   | Fair
Value
|----------------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | ------ | --------------- | - | ----------
|Government bonds and notes                                              |                  | $              | 24,836 |                 | $ | 134       
|Corporate bonds and notes                                               |                  |                | 41,910 |                 |   | 129       
|                                                                        |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                                                        |                  |                | 66,746 |                 |   | 263       
|Less amounts classified as cash equivalents                             |                  |                | 20,418 |                 |   |          
|                                                                        |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|Short-term investments                                                  |                  | $              | 46,328 |                 | $ | 263       
|                                                                        |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|Contractual maturity dates of short-term investment in bonds and notes: |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                                                        | Less than 1 year |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                                                        | 1 to 5 years     |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                                                        |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                                                        |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                                                        |                  |                |        |                 |   |           

|As of March 31, 2002                           |                  | Amortized
Cost |        | Unrealized
Gain |   | Fair
Value
|---------------------------------------------- | ---------------- | -------------- | ------ | --------------- | - | ----------
|Government bonds and notes                     |                  | $              | 15,539 |                 | $ | 158       
|Corporate bonds and notes                      |                  |                | 50,749 |                 |   | 53        
|                                               |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                               |                  |                | 66,288 |                 |   | 211       
|Less amounts classified as cash equivalents    |                  |                | 17,914 |                 |   |          
|                                               |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|Short-term investments                         |                  | $              | 48,374 |                 | $ | 211       
|                                               |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|Contractual maturity dates of bonds and notes: |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                               | Less than 1 year |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                               | 1 to 5 years     |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                               |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                               |                  |                |        |                 |   |           
|                                               |                  |                |        |                 |   |           

8.    PER SHARE COMPUTATION

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted net income per share
is computed using the weighted average number of common and potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Potentially dilutive common shares include
the effect of stock options. For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, 2,838,149 and 2,849,491 shares of common stock subject to outstanding options, respectively, were not included
in the calculation of diluted net loss per share as they were considered antidilutive due to the net loss the Company experienced in these fiscal periods.

10

---

9.    SEGMENT INFORMATION

Geographic Segment Data:

Net revenue from unaffiliated customers by geographic region were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months EndedJune 30,
2002

July 1,
2001Canada

$
2,346

$
11,308United States


6,108


10,727South Korea


5,924


3,205France


2,415


486Brazil


1,134


148China


770


4,009Other countries


119


557Total

$
18,816

$
30,440


The
Company's long-lived assets are located in the following countries (in thousands):

June 30,
2002

March 31,
2002United States

$
5,500

$
4,871Thailand


2,622


3,307South Korea


1,254


1,033China


291


309Malaysia


118


131Total

$
9,785

$
9,651


10.  CLOSURE OF MANUFACTURING OPERATIONS AND RELATED RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

In June 2001, the Company decided to transfer its power amplifier repair and product integration operations in Sunnyvale, California to contract manufacturers. In
connection with the transfer, the Company recognized in the three months ended July 1, 2001, a charge of $686,000 for estimated severance costs related to organizational changes and a planned
reduction in work force and the write off of property and equipment that had no future value to the Company. As of June 30, 2002, the Company has completed the transfer of the repair and product
integration operations and terminated approximately 60 employees. The following table represents the restructuring activity that took place through June 30, 2002 (in thousands):

|                                          |  | Asset
Write-offs
(Non Cash) |      | Reduction in
Workforce
(Cash) |   | Other (Cash) |   | Total |    
|----------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | ---- | ----------------------------- | - | ------------ | - | ----- | ---
|Accrual for restructuring charges         |  | $                           | 161  |                               | $ | 485          |   | $     | 40 
|Cash payment of severance costs           |  |                             |     |                               |   | (485         | ) |       |   
|Cash payment of other restructuring costs |  |                             |     |                               |   |             |   |       | (40
|Write-off of property and equipment       |  |                             | (161 | )                             |   |             |   |       |   
|                                          |  |                             |      |                               |   |              |   |       |    
|Balance at June 30, 2002                  |  | $                           |     |                               | $ |             |   | $     |   
|                                          |  |                             |      |                               |   |              |   |       |    

11

---

11.  Comprehensive Income

Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 130 ("SFAS 130")"Reporting Comprehensive Income"establishes rules
for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components. The following are the components of comprehensive loss (in thousands):

Three Months EndedJune 30,
2002

July 1,
2001Net loss

$
(3,560
)
$
(4,226
)Net change in unrealized gain on marketable securities


52


14,862Comprehensive income (loss)

$
(3,508
)
$
10,636


The
components of accumulated other comprehensive gain are as follows (in thousands):

June 30,
2002

March 31,
2002Unrealized gain on marketable securities

$
263

$
211


12.  Commitments

Purchase Commitments.In December 2000, the Company and Cree entered into the Purchase and Supply Agreement, under which the
Company was obligated to purchase from Cree an aggregate of $58 million of semiconductors, with quarterly purchase commitments through December 2002. In October 2001 and April 2002, the Purchase and
Supply Agreement was amended to reduce the
aggregate purchase commitment to $54.8 million and to extend the quarterly purchase commitments through June 2003. As of June 30, 2002, the remaining purchase commitment is $16.3 million.

Purchase Commitments with Subcontract Manufacturers.The Company provides a six month rolling forecast of finished goods
requirements to its subcontract manufacturers monthly for planning and long-lead time parts procurement purposes only. The Company issues purchase orders to the subcontract manufacturers with delivery
dates from four to twelve weeks from the purchase order date. Once a purchase order is accepted by the subcontract manufacturer, the Company is committed to accept delivery of the amplifiers or
reimburse the subcontract manufacturer for costs incurred to date. The subcontract manufacturers procure raw materials and schedule labor needed to manufacture the Company amplifiers based on the
aforementioned forecasts and standard purchase orders. In the past, the Company has reimbursed the subcontract manufacturers for the cost of long-lead time parts and other raw material costs that had
been incurred by the subcontract manufacturers because of the reduction of purchase order and forecasted quantities. The subcontract manufacturers also maintain inventory levels to repair the Company
amplifiers. At June 30, 2002, total accepted and unfulfilled purchase orders to procure completed amplifiers and amplifier repair services totaled $3.6 million. At June 30, 2002, the subcontract
manufacturers had $11.2 million of materials on hand and an additional $4.5 million of purchase commitments to buy raw materials to fulfill the accepted purchase orders, forecasted requirements and
repair requirements from the Company. At June 30, 2002, the Company estimated that $1.3 million of the purchase commitments made by the subcontract manufacturers are non-cancelable.

Other Purchase Commitments.During its normal course of business, the Company also issues purchase orders to procure
components, materials and services from other vendors. As of June 30, 2002, the Company's outstanding purchase commitments with vendors other than Cree and its subcontract manufacturers totaled
approximately $5.3 million.

12

---

Royalty Commitments.On November 15, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement (the "License Agreement") with Paragon
Communications Ltd. ("Paragon") to license certain technology that can be used in the design of RF power amplifiers. Under the terms of the License Agreement, the Company may be required to pay a
royalty to Paragon based upon revenues of products that incorporate the licensed technology ("Royalty Fee"). If the Company elects to license the technology provided by Paragon, the Company must make
quarterly advance royalty payments beginning August 2002 through August 2004 in amounts ranging from $50,000 to $125,000 per quarter. To the extent the cumulative advance royalty
payments exceed the cumulative Royalty Fee, the Company is entitled to apply such excess to reduce the Royalty Fee otherwise payable under the agreement in future periods.

13.  Line of Credit

The Company has a revolving line of credit of $10.0 million with a bank collateralized by the majority of the Company's assets. The line of credit expires on June
4, 2003. Under the terms of the master agreement governing this credit instrument, as amended, the Company is required to maintain certain minimum cash and investment balances and other specific
financial ratios. The master agreement also has certain restrictions on other indebtedness and the payment of dividends. At June 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the
master agreement. The amount available to borrow at June 30, 2002, was $10.0 million. The Company can borrow at either (i) a variable rate equal to the prime rate or (ii) a fixed rate equal to 200
basis points above the LIBOR rate, which at June 30, 2002 were 4.8% and 3.9%, respectively. The Company had no borrowings under the line of credit at June 30, 2002.

14.  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Sales to Cingular Wireless LLC.For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and the three months ended July 1, 2001, Cingular
purchased approximately $2.6 million and $29,000 of multi-channel power amplifiers ("MCPA") products from the Company, respectively. Robert W. Shaner, President of Wireless Operations for Cingular,
has served as a member of the Company's board of directors since April 1999.

Outsourced Stock Option Administration Services.In May of 2000, Spectrian entered into a non-binding arrangement with
Montgomery Financial Services Corp. ("MFS"). MFS provides on-site stock option administration services to the Company. Henry C. Montgomery, Chairman of the Board of MFS, has served as a member of the
Company's board of directors since November 2000. For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, the Company purchased services in the amount of $11,000 and $13,000, respectively, from
MFS.

Investment in ArrayComm, Inc.In July of 1998, Spectrian purchased 222,222 shares of Series D preferred stock at $4.50 per
share of ArrayComm, Inc. ("ArrayComm"). The total investment in Arraycomm was $1.0 million. ArrayComm is a privately held company that develops antenna-based wireless communications and broadband
internet access technologies. Martin Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of ArrayComm, has also served as a member of the Company's board of directors since January 1994.

15.  LITIGATION

A putative class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara on May 28, 2002, captioned Vogel v. Shaner, et
al., Case No. CV808140. The complaint names six of the Company's directors and its chief executive officer as defendants. In the complaint,
the plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated their fiduciary duties owed to the Company's stockholders, including their duties of loyalty, good faith and independence, by engaging in
self-dealing

13

---

in the merger transaction with REMEC. This violation allegedly stemmed from the defendants' failure to properly value the Company in the merger and due to conflicts of interest. The plaintiff
purportedly brought his action on behalf of Company stockholders who are or would be harmed by the alleged conduct. The case seeks declaratory, injunctive and other forms of relief. The Company and
the defendant directors and officer believe that the lawsuit is without merit and intend to defend the case vigorously. However, given that the lawsuit has only recently been filed, it is not possible
to predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of this litigation.

14

---



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not purely historical are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), including statements regarding Spectrian
Corporation's ("the Company") expectations, hopes, intentions or strategies regarding the future. When used herein, the words "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "continue," "estimate," "project,"
"intend" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Forward looking statements include, but are not
limited to: the statements in the fourth paragraph of "Overview" regarding the recognition in the future of gains on the sale of UltraRF and the effect of the sale of UltraRF on the Company's
semiconductor cost, in the sixth paragraph regarding the impact on the Company of a loss of a major original equipment manufacturer customer and the future fluctuations of Nortel product orders, in
the seventh paragraph regarding international sales as a percentage of future revenues and the impact of currency fluctuations on future revenues, in the eight paragraph regarding the timing of the
transfer of power amplifier repair operations, and in the last paragraph regarding average selling prices and gross margins; the statements in the second paragraph under "Results of
OperationsCost of Revenues" regarding the gross margin as a percentage of net revenues; the statements under "Results of OperationsResearch and Development" regarding the
increase in research and development expenses; the statement under "Results of OperationsIncome Taxes" regarding the recoverability and the recording of the net deferred tax asset; the
statements in the last paragraph under "Liquidity and Capital Resources" concerning the anticipated spending for capital additions for the next twelve months, the sufficiency of the Company's
available resources to meet cash requirements and the factors which will determine the Company's future cash requirements; and the statements in "Factors Affecting Future Operating Results." Results
could differ materially based on various factors including, but not limited to, those described below, under the heading "Factors Affecting Future Operating Results" and elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q.

All forward-looking statements included in this document are based on information available to the Company on the date hereof, and the Company assumes no
obligation to update any such forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that any forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks and
uncertainties and that actual results may differ materially from those included within the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. These forward-looking statements are made in
reliance upon the safe harbor provision of The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Overview

Spectrian Corporation ("Spectrian" or the "Company") designs, manufacturers and markets high-power radio frequency ("RF") amplifiers, for the global wireless
communications industry. The Company's power amplifiers support a broad range of transmission standards, including Advanced Mobile Phone Services ("AMPS"), Time Division Multiple Access ("TDMA"), Code
Division Multiple Access ("CDMA" and "CDMA2000"), Personal Communications System ("PCS"), Global System for Mobil Communications ("GSM"), Wireless Local Loop ("WLL"), Universal Mobile Telephone
Service ("UMTS") and IMT-2000. Spectrian's power amplifiers are utilized as part of the infrastructure for both wireless voice and data networks. The Company's power amplifiers boost the power of a
signal so that it can reach a wireless phone or other device within a designated geography.

On
May 19, 2002, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization (the "Merger Agreement") by and among REMEC, Inc., a California corporation ("REMEC"), Reef
Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of REMEC ("Merger Sub") and the Company pursuant to which REMEC will acquire the Company by a merger of Merger Sub with the
Company ("the merger"). Upon consummation of the merger, the

15

---

Company's stockholders will receive approximately $14.00 of REMEC common stock, subject to a collar, or if REMEC chooses, a combination of REMEC common stock and cash. If REMEC elects to pay in cash,
it may pay up to $4.00 per share in cash. The remaining payment will be in REMEC common stock, which will be determined based on the average trading price of REMEC common stock for the ten day period
ending on the second trading day before the Company's special meeting of stockholders to approve the merger and the Merger Agreement. Spectrian stockholders will also receive cash for any fractional
shares of REMEC common stock that they are entitled to receive in the merger.

The
parties intend for the merger to be considered a tax-free reorganization under the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the REMEC common stock issued to the Company's stockholders.
The Merger Agreement has been approved unanimously by the board of directors of both companies. The merger is expected to close in the quarter ending September 30, 2002 but is subject to a number of
conditions including, among other things, approval of the Company's stockholders, approval of REMEC's shareholders and various regulatory approvals and clearances, including those under the Securities
Act of 1933, as amended.

On
December 29, 2000, the Company completed the sale of substantially all of the assets and external liabilities comprising its semiconductor division, UltraRF, to Cree, Inc. ("Cree")
pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of November 20, 2000 (the "Asset Purchase Agreement") among Cree, Zoltar Acquisition, Inc. ("Zoltar") and the Company for 1,815,402 shares of Cree
common stock plus Cree common stock with a guaranteed realizable value of $30.0 million, less $1,141,000 owed by the Company to Cree due to a change in the value of net assets of UltraRF between
October 1, 2000 and December 29, 2000. As part of the definitive agreement, the Company and Cree entered into a supply agreement ("the Purchase and Supply Agreement"), under which the Company is
obligated to purchase from Cree an aggregate of $58.0 million of semiconductors, with quarterly purchase commitments through December 2002. In October 2001 and April 2002, the Purchase and Supply
Agreement was
amended to reduce the aggregate purchase commitment to $54.8 million and to extend the quarterly purchase commitments through June 2003. As of June 30, 2002, the remaining purchase commitment was
$16.3 million. In the event Spectrian fails to make these purchases, it is obligated either to purchase excess inventory that it may never utilize or to pay Cree the amount of the shortfall in cash.
Accordingly, Spectrian deferred $58.0 million of the gain on sale of UltraRF, which represented the amount of purchase commitment in the original Purchase and Supply Agreement, and is recognizing the
gain in periods as the related purchase commitments to Cree are being discharged. In the three months ended June 30, 2002, Spectrian fulfilled its obligation under the contract and recognized $5.0
million of the deferred gain. As a result of the sale, the Company's cost of semiconductors used in the manufacturing of amplifier products increased because purchases from UltraRF are at fair market
value rather than at manufacturing cost as was the case historically.

For
the three months ended June 30, 2002, Nortel Networks Corporation ("Nortel"), Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. ("Samsung"), Cingular Wireless LLC ("Cingular") and Verizon Communications
Inc. ("Verizon") accounted for approximately 35%, 28%, 14% and 11% of net revenues, respectively. For the three months ended July 1, 2001, Nortel and Verizon accounted for approximately 76% and 10% of
net revenues, respectively.

The
Company and Nortel have a supply agreement, renegotiated annually, pursuant to which Nortel commits to purchase a certain volume of its annual power amplifier requirements for
specified prices from the Company. This agreement allows Nortel to change the product mix requirements, which can significantly affect the Company's gross margins, and to change requested delivery
dates without significant financial consequences to Nortel. In addition, the Company's sales to Verizon, Samsung and Cingular are generally made on the basis of purchase orders rather than long-term
purchase commitments and any of these customers may cancel or defer its purchase orders without advanced notice to the Company. The Company's contractual relationships with its major customers
adversely affects the Company's ability to efficiently manage production schedules and inventory levels and to

16

---

accurately forecast product sales. The Company's business, financial condition and results of operations have been materially adversely affected in the past by anticipated orders failing to
materialize and by deferrals or cancellations of orders as a result of changes in customer requirements. In the past, product orders from Nortel have fluctuated sharply and the Company does not
currently sell any multicarrier power amplifiers ("MCPA") products to Nortel, which has adversely affected the Company's revenues and earnings. There can be no assurance that the Company will not
experience such fluctuations in the future or that the Company will receive any orders for MCPA products from Nortel or other parties in the future. If the Company is unable to find other customers to
generate demand for its new and existing products, the Company's revenues may be materially adversely impacted. If the Company were to lose Nortel, Verizon, Samsung, Cingular or any other major
customer, or if orders by Nortel, Verizon, Samsung, Cingular or any other major customer were to otherwise materially decrease either in unit quantity or in price, the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

During
the three months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, sales outside of the United States were 68% and 65%, respectively, of net revenues. The Company expects that international
sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of the Company's net revenues for the next 12 months. Financial market turmoil, economic downturn, consolidation or merger of customers, and
other changes in
business conditions in any of the Company's current or future markets, such as Canada, South Korea, China, France and Brazil, may have a material adverse effect on the Company's sales of its products.
Furthermore, because the Company's products are predominantly priced in U.S. dollars, currency fluctuations and instability in the financial markets that are served by the Company may make the
Company's products more expensive than those of other manufacturers whose products are priced in the local currency of the customer and may result in reduced revenues for the Company. In addition, a
portion of the Company's international product revenues (primarily in China) and repair revenues (primarily in South Korea) are denominated in foreign currencies. Due to the long sales cycle, the
Company may be unable to competitively adjust its prices to reflect fluctuations in the exchange rate, which may result in reduced revenues. In situations where the Company bills and receives local
currencies, the Company may be restricted or impaired from exchanging the local currency into U.S. dollars due to expatriation laws or regulations in foreign countries which may adversely affect the
Company's operations and financial condition.

In
September 2000, the Company completed the transfer of its power amplifier production to a contract manufacturer located in Thailand on a turnkey basis. In the quarter ended June 30,
2002, the Company completed the transfer of its power amplifier repair and product integration operations to the same contract manufacturer. Also during fiscal 2002, the Company transferred the
production of a lower volume single carrier GSM product to a second contract manufacturer in Taiwan and Wuxi, China. In the future, the Company intends to subcontract MCPA products to this second
contract manufacturer. The Company utilizes contract manufacturing to decrease the Company's manufacturing overhead and costs of its products, to increase flexibility to respond to fluctuations in
product demand and to leverage the strengths of the contract manufacturer's focus on high volume and high quality manufacturing. In addition, the Company has introduced multiple products based on a
common set of parts, in order to reduce the risk of future excess and obsolete inventory. The Company maintains responsibility for qualification of components, assembly processes and test procedures.
In calendar 2001, the Company believed that the financial strength of this contract manufacturer may have become impaired due to the declaration of bankruptcy by its U.S. parent corporation. However,
in July 2002, Benchmark Electronics, Inc, a provider of electronics manufacturing and design services, acquired the contract manufacturer.

Demands
from its customers drive the Company to frequently introduce and rapidly expand manufacturing volumes of its new products. This has caused the Company to experience high
materials and manufacturing costs, including high scrap and material waste, significant materials obsolescence,

17

---

labor inefficiencies and overtime expenses, inefficient material procurement and an inability to realize economies of scale. These high manufacturing costs and production interruptions have had an
adverse effect on the Company's results of operations. In addition, the Company has made and expects to continue to make pricing commitments to original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") customers in
anticipation of achieving manufacturing cost reductions from both product redesign and manufacturing improvements obtained from its contract manufacturers. There can be no guarantee that the Company's
common platform or other manufacturing strategies will eliminate excess and obsolete inventory or improve production costs.

Although
the Company has transitioned substantially all of its manufacturing activities to an outside contract manufacturer, the Company still has significant fixed costs and is
therefore dependent upon substantial revenues to achieve and maintain profitability.

The
merchant market for the Company's products is becoming increasingly competitive. The Company sells its power amplifier products in several countries where its competitors are already
well established as suppliers. The Company competes with several merchant amplifier manufacturers for business from Nortel, Verizon, Samsung and Cingular. Major manufacturers of wireless
communications equipment have elected to enter the merchant amplifier business and compete directly with the Company. In 2001, Lucent Technologies, Inc. ("Lucent"), formed and spun out Celiant
Corporation ("Celiant"), which entered the merchant amplifier market. In June 2002, Andrew Corporation ("Andrew") acquired Celiant. This competition has resulted in, and will continue to result in
reduced average selling prices for the Company's products, which accordingly will negatively impact gross margins.



The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could affect the results of operations reported in future periods. For a description of
the Company's critical accounting policies and estimates, please refer to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
There have been no material changes in any of the Company's accounting policies since March 31, 2002.

18

---

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated certain statement of operations data of the Company expressed as a percentage of total revenues and gross
margin on sales.

Three Months EndedJune 30,
2002

July 1,
2001NET REVENUES

100.0
%
100.0
%COSTS AND EXPENSES:Cost of revenues

91.8

98.1Research and development

29.4

19.5Selling, general and administrative

20.2

15.4Restructuring costs



2.3Costs related to proposed acquisition by REMEC, Inc.

6.4

Total costs and expenses

147.8

135.3OPERATING LOSS

(47.8
)
(35.3
)INTEREST INCOME

3.6

2.9INTEREST EXPENSE



OTHER INCOME

25.5

16.9LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES

(18.7
)
(15.5
)INCOME TAXES

0.2

LOSS BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE

(18.9
)
(15.5
)CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLEADOPTION OF SFAS 133



1.6NET LOSS

(18.9
)%
(13.9
)%GROSS MARGIN ON SALES

8.2
%
1.9
%


Net Revenues.The Company's net revenues decreased 38% to $18.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $30.4
million for the three months ended July 1, 2001. The decrease in net revenues was primarily due to lower demand and reduced average selling prices for the Company's single carrier power amplifier
("SCPA") legacy products, lower demand for the Company's Broadband products, and to a lesser degree, reduced average selling prices for some of the Company's MCPA products. MCPA product revenues
increased 79% to $11.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $6.5 million for the three months ended July 1, 2001, primarily due to the introduction of a new MCPA product in the three
months ended December 31, 2001 and higher demand for the Company's MCPA products in Asia. SCPA revenues, primarily derived from sales to Nortel, one of the Company's major customers, decreased 72% to
$6.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $22.2 million for the three months ended July 1, 2001, primarily due to the replacement of SPCA products with MCPA products in certain of the
customers' new product designs. Broadband revenues decreased 100% to zero for the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $576,000 for the three months ended July 1, 2001 due to the bankruptcy of the
network operator that deployed the Company's broadband amplifiers.

Cost of Revenues.Cost of revenues consists primarily of turnkey amplifier costs for the Company's products, internal
amplifier assembly and test costs, raw materials, manufacturing overhead and warranty costs. The Company's cost of sales decreased by 42% to $17.3 million for the three months

19

---

ended June 30, 2002 from $29.9 million for the three months ended July 1, 2001. The decrease in cost of revenues was primarily due to lower sales and, to a lesser degree, decreased inventory
obsolescence and lower of cost or market expense, from $2.6 million in the three months ended July 1, 2001 to $859,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2002.

Gross
margin on sales was 8% for the three months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to 2% for the three months ended July 1, 2001. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of net
revenues was primarily due to the higher mix of MCPA product sales, which generate a higher gross margin than SCPA products, lower per unit manufacturing costs for SCPA and MCPA products and decreased
inventory obsolescence and lower of cost or market expense from $2.6 million in the three months ended July 1, 2001 to $859,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2002, partially offset by the decline
of average selling prices of products.

Research and Development.Research and development ("R&D") expenses include the cost of designing, developing or reducing the
manufacturing cost of amplifiers. The Company's R&D expenses decreased by 7% to $5.5 million in the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $5.9 million in the three months ended July 1, 2001. As a
percentage of net revenues, R&D expenses represented 29% of net revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to 20% of revenues for the three months ended July 1, 2001. R&D expenses
for the quarter ended July 1, 2001 included $600,000 paid to Cree for product development efforts. No such costs were incurred in the quarter ended June 30, 2002. The increase in R&D
expenses as a percentage of net revenues was due to lower revenues.

Selling, General and Administrative.Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses include compensation and benefits
for sales, marketing, senior management and administrative personnel, commissions paid to independent sales representatives, professional fees and other expenses. The Company's SG&A expenses decreased
by 19% to $3.8 million in the three months ended June 30, 2002 from $4.7 million in the three months ended July 1, 2001. As a percentage of net revenues, SG&A expenses represented 20% of net revenues
for the three months ended June 30, 2002 as compared to 15% of net revenues for the three months ended July 1, 2001. The absolute dollar decrease in SG&A expenses was primarily due to lower
commissions associated with lower revenues and reduced general and administrative expenses as a result of cost reduction actions. The increase in SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenues was due
to lower revenues.

Restructuring Costs.In June 2001, the Company decided to transfer its power amplifier repair and product integration
operations in Sunnyvale, California to contract manufacturers. In connection with the transfer, the Company recognized in the three months ended July 1, 2001 a restructuring charge of $686,000 for
estimated severance costs related to organizational changes and a planned reduction in work force and the write off of property and equipment that had no future value to the Company. As of June 30,
2002, the Company had completed the transfer of the repair and product integration operations and terminated approximately 60 employees.

Costs related to proposed acquisition by REMEC.The Company and REMEC entered into a definitive merger agreement on May 19,
2002, pursuant to which REMEC will acquire the Company by issuing REMEC common stock, or if REMEC chooses, a combination of REMEC common stock and cash. During the three months ended June 30, 2002,
the Company incurred approximately $1.2 million of legal, accounting and investment banking costs, which were directly attributable to the pending acquisition of Spectrian by REMEC.

Interest Income.Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2002 decreased by 25% to $668,000 from $887,000 for the
three months ended July 1, 2001. The decrease in interest income resulted from lower interest-bearing investment balances associated with lower average cash and cash equivalent balances and lower
average interest rates.

20

---

Interest Expense.Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2002 decreased by 88% to $1,000 from $8,000 for the
three months ended July 1, 2001. The decrease in interest expense was a result of reduced average borrowing levels due to repayments of capital lease obligations.

Other Income.Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2002 decreased by 7% to $4.8 million from $5.2 million for the
three months ended July 1, 2001. Other income for the three months ended June 30, 2002 included a $5.0 million gain on the sale of UltraRF recognized as a result of fulfillment
of the minimum purchase commitments for these periods to Cree under the Purchase and Supply Agreement, as amended, partially offset by a $199,000 loss on foreign exchange translation. Other income for
the three months ended July 1, 2001 included a $7.5 million gain recognized on the sale of UltraRF, partially offset by a net $2.3 million loss associated with sales of Cree common stock and
common stock options held by the Company.

Income Taxes.The Company did not record income tax expense except for minimum state taxes and foreign taxes in the three
months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001. Due to the uncertainties surrounding the realization of the deferred tax assets resulting from the Company's accumulated deficit and net losses, the
Company provided a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets where the realization was uncertain. The Company will continue to evaluate positive and negative evidence on the recoverability of
its net deferred tax asset each quarter and will record the net deferred tax asset when it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will be recovered.

Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting PrincipleAdoption of SFAS 133.The Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended by Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 137, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesDeferral of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 133, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No.
138, Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (referred to hereafter as "SFAS 133") on April 1, 2001. In the three months
ended December 31, 2000 and the three months ended July 1, 2001, the Company entered into various option arrangements known as a cashless collar, to hedge its investment in Cree common stock, which
was acquired through the sale of UltraRF. The Company has designated these option arrangements as fair value hedges under SFAS 133. In accordance with the transition provisions of SFAS 133, the
Company recorded an approximate $494,000 gain cumulative effect adjustment in earnings as of April 1, 2001.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 ("SFAS 142"), "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets", which is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. SFAS 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. In addition, the standard includes provisions upon adoption for the
reclassification of certain existing recognized intangibles as goodwill, reassessment of the useful lives of existing recognized intangibles, reclassification of certain intangibles out of previously
reported goodwill and the testing for impairment of existing goodwill and other intangibles. The Company adopted SFAS 142 on April 1, 2002. The adoption of SFAS 142 did not have a significant impact
on the Company's financial position and results of operations.

In
October 2001, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 ("SFAS 144"), "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," which is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001 and interim periods within those fiscal periods. This Statement supersedes FASB Statement No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets and for
Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed of" and Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 30 ("APB 30"), "Reporting Results of OperationsReporting the Effects of Disposal of a Division of a

21

---

Business", however, this Statement retains the requirement of APB 30 to report discontinued operations separately from continuing operations and extends that reporting to a component of an entity
that either has been disposed of (by sale, by abandonment, or in a distribution to owners) or is classified as held for sale. This Statement addresses financial accounting and reporting for the
impairment of certain long-lived assets and for long-lived assets to be disposed of. The Company adopted SFAS 144 on April 1, 2002 and the adoption did not have a significant impact on its financial
position and results of operations.

In
June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Exit or Disposal Activities"' ("SFAS 146"). SFAS 146 addresses significant issues regarding the recognition, measurement, and
reporting of costs that are associated with exit and disposal activities, including restructuring activities that are currently accounted for under EITF No. 94-3, "Liability Recognition for Certain
Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." The scope of SFAS 146 also includes costs related to terminating a contract
that is not a capital lease and termination benefits that employees who are involuntarily terminated receive under the terms of a one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing benefit
arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract. SFAS 146 will be effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002 and early application is encouraged.
The Company will adopt SFAS 146 during the fourth quarter ending March 31, 2003. The provisions of EITF No. 94-3 shall continue to apply for an exit activity initiated under an exit plan that met the
criteria of EITF No. 94-3 prior to the adoption of SFAS 146. The effect on adoption of SFAS 146 will change on a prospective basis the timing of when restructuring charges are recorded from a
commitment date approach to when the liability is incurred.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company has financed its growth through sales of Company assets or subsidiaries, sales of common stock, private sales of equity securities, capital equipment
leases, bank lines of credit and cash flows from operations. Principal sources of liquidity at June 30, 2002 consisted of cash and cash equivalents and short-term debt investments, which totaled $81.8
million, and bank borrowing arrangements.

The
Company has a revolving line of credit of $10.0 million with a bank collateralized by the majority of the Company's assets. The line of credit expires in June 2003. Under the terms
of the master agreement governing this credit instrument, as amended, the Company is required to maintain certain minimum cash and investment balances and other specific financial ratios. The master
agreement also has certain restrictions on other indebtedness and the payment of dividends. At June 30, 2002, the Company was in compliance with the covenants of the master agreement. The amount
available to borrow at June 30, 2002 was $10.0 million. The Company can borrow at either (i) a variable rate equal to the prime rate or (ii) a fixed rate equal to 200 basis points above the LIBOR
rate, which at June 30, 2002 was 4.8% and 3.9%, respectively.

The
Company's working capital decreased by $2.9 million to $84.7 million as of June 30, 2002 from $87.6 million as of March 31, 2002. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $6.9
million decrease in cash and cash equivalents, a $2.0 million decrease in short-term investments, a $4.3 million decrease in accounts receivable as a result of lower sales, a $1.1 million decrease in
net inventories primarily due to lower production levels associated with lower sales volumes and a $136,000 increase in income taxes payable, partially offset by a $5.0 million decrease in accounts
payable which decreased proportionally with the lower production levels, a $1.6 million decrease in accrued liabilities and a $5.0 million decrease in deferred gain on the sale of UltraRF. The
Company's short-term debt investments were principally invested in investment grade, interest-bearing securities.

Cash
used by operations was $8.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2002 compared to $9.9 million for the three months ended July 1, 2001. Cash used by operations for the three
months

22

---

ended June 30, 2002 consisted of a $3.6 million net loss, a $5.0 million recognized non-cash gain from the sale of UltraRF, as the Company fulfilled the minimum purchase commitment per the Purchase
and Supply Agreement, as amended, a $5.0 million decrease in accounts payable associated with lower production levels due to lower sales and a $1.6 million decrease in accrued liabilities, partially
offset by a $1.1 million of depreciation and amortization expense, a $136,000 increase in income taxes payable, a $4.3 million decrease in accounts receivable as a result of lower sales, a $196,000
decrease in gross inventories primarily due to lower production levels associated with lower sales volumes, an $859,000 charge for inventory obsolescence and lower of cost or market expense and a
$192,000 decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets.

Cash
used by operations for the three months ended July 1, 2001 consisted of a $4.2 million net loss, a $494,000 million non-cash cumulative-effect gain related to the adoption of SFAS
133, a $7.5 million recognized non-cash gain from the sale of UltraRF, a $9.2 million decrease in accounts payable due to lower production volumes associated with lower sales, a $7.2 million increase
in inventories due to increased finished goods caused by a lower than expected revenue compared with the Company's revenue outlook, a $1.1 million increase in prepaid expenses and other assets, which
were partially offset by a $12.6 million decrease in accounts receivable as a result of lower sales and improved days-outstanding ratio, a $2.3 million net loss on short-term investments,
including Cree common stock and Cree common stock options, a $2.6 million charge for inventory obsolescence and lower of cost or market expense, a $1.3 million depreciation and amortization expense, a
$483,000 loss on the sale and write-off of property and equipment and a $519,000 increase in accrued liabilities primarily due to the reserve for restructuring charges.

The
Company's investing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2002 provided cash of approximately $733,000 as compared to $24.3 million during the three months ended July 1,
2001. Cash provided by investing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2002 resulted primarily from $3.0 million from sale of short-term investments and $6.8 million from the maturities of
short term investments, partially offset by $7.7 million in purchases of short-term investments and $1.3 million in purchases of property and equipment. Capital additions for the three months ended
June 30, 2002 included manufacturing test and production equipment required to support new products and test equipment to support various research and development projects.

Cash
provided by investing activities during the three months ended July 1, 2001 resulted primarily from $11.8 million from maturities of short term investments and $23.1 million from
sale of short-term investments, which included approximately $22.2 million generated from the sale of 739,000 shares of Cree common stock and $3.2 million from the release of restricted cash, which
represented one-half of the amount held in escrow to secure the Company's representations, warranties and covenants related to the sale of UltraRF to Cree, partially offset by $13.0 million in
purchases of short-term investments and $837,000 in purchases of property and equipment.

23

---

The Company's financing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2002 provided cash of approximately $607,000 as compared to $922,000 during the three months ended July 1, 2001.
Cash provided by financing activities during the three months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, was the result of proceeds of $639,000 and $922,000, respectively, from the issuance of common
stock, through the exercise of employee stock options and employee stock purchase plan activity.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

Capital Lease Obligations.The Company entered into capital leases for test equipment for a 24-month lease term expiring from
July to October 2002.

Operating Leases.During fiscal 1997, the Company sold its two principal facilities in Sunnyvale, California for
approximately $16.4 million and leased the two facilities back under an operating lease. The lease expires in November 2011 and the quarterly rent payments are subject to Consumer Price Index
adjustments on a tri-annual basis. The lease agreement provides that the Company would have the right of first refusal to purchase the properties upon certain conditions. In connection with the sale
of UltraRF to Cree in December 2000, the Company subleased one of the two facilities under the operating lease to Cree for the remaining term of the lease under substantially the same terms and
conditions as the Company's lease.

In
1998, the Company entered into an operating lease for an ancillary 40,000 square foot manufacturing facility in Rocklin, California for a sixty month lease term expiring in June 2003.
During the second quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company subleased its Rocklin facility to The Gap, Inc. for the remainder of the Company's lease term.

The
Company also leases facilities in Folsom, California; Quincy, Illinois; Bellevue, Washington; Korea, China and Brazil to support its administrative, development, manufacturing,
repair, and sales and marketing activities.

Purchase Commitments with Cree.In December 2000, the Company and Cree entered into the Purchase and Supply Agreement under
which the Company was obligated to purchase from Cree an aggregate of $58.0 million of semiconductors, with quarterly purchase commitments through December 2002. In October 2001 and April 2002, the
Purchase and Supply Agreement was amended to reduce the aggregate purchase commitment to $54.8 million and to extend the quarterly purchase commitments through June 2003. As of June 30, 2002, the
remaining purchase commitment was $16.3 million.

Purchase Commitments with Subcontract Manufacturers.The Company provides a six month rolling forecast of finished goods
requirements to its subcontract manufacturers monthly for planning and long-lead time parts procurement purposes only. The Company issues purchase orders to the subcontract manufacturers with delivery
dates from four to twelve weeks from the purchase order date. Once a purchase order is accepted by the subcontract manufacturer, the Company is committed to accept delivery of the amplifiers or
reimburse the subcontract manufacturer for costs incurred to date. The subcontract manufacturers procures raw materials and schedules labor needed to manufacture the Company amplifiers based on the
forecasts and standard purchase orders. In the past, the Company has reimbursed the subcontract manufacturers for the cost of long-lead time parts and other raw material costs that had been incurred
by the subcontract manufacturers because of the reduction in purchase orders and forecasted quantities. The subcontract manufacturers also maintain inventory levels to repair the Company amplifiers.
At June 30, 2002, total accepted and unfulfilled purchase orders to procure completed amplifiers and amplifier repair services totaled $3.6 million. At June 30, 2002, the subcontract manufacturers had
$11.2 million of materials on hand and an additional $4.5 million of purchase commitments to buy raw materials to fulfill the accepted purchase orders, forecasted requirements and repair requirements
from the Company. At June 30, 2002, the Company estimated

24

---

that $1.3 million of the purchase commitments made by the subcontract manufacturers were non-cancelable.

Other Purchase Commitments.During its normal course of business, the Company also issues purchase orders to procure
components, materials and services from other vendors. As of June 30, 2002, the Company's outstanding purchase commitments with vendors other than Cree and its subcontract manufacturers totaled
approximately $5.3 million.

Royalty Commitments.On November 15, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement (the "License Agreement") with Paragon to
license certain technology that can be used in the design of RF power amplifiers. Under the terms of the License Agreement, the Company may be required to pay a royalty to Paragon based upon revenues
of products that incorporate the licensed technology ("Royalty Fee"). If the Company elects to license the technology provided by Paragon, the Company must make quarterly advance royalty payments
beginning August 2002 through August 2004 in amounts ranging from $50,000 to $125,000 per quarter. To the extent the cumulative advance royalty payments exceed the cumulative Royalty
Fee, the Company is entitled to apply such excess to reduce the Royalty Fee otherwise payable under the agreement in future periods.

Future
payments under all royalty commitments, purchase commitments, capital leases, non-cancelable operating leases and sublease income under these operating leases as of June 30, 2002
are as follows (in thousands):

|                                                    |  | Amounts Due by Period
|--------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|
|Capital lease obligations                           |  | $                    
|Operating leases                                    |  |                      
|Minimum Royalty commitments with Paragon            |  |                      
|Minimum Purchase commitments with Cree              |  |                      
|Purchase commitments with subcontract manufacturers |  |                      
|Other purchase commitments                          |  |                      
|                                                    |  |                      
|Total commitments                                   |  | $                    
|                                                    |  |                      
|Sublease income                                     |  | $                    
|                                                    |  |                      

In
September 2001, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10.0 million of the Company's common stock. Repurchases may be made in the open market at
times and prices considered appropriate by the Company's management. As of June 30, 2002, the Company had bought back 293,700 shares of its common stock at an average per share price of $9.80 for
approximately $2.9 million. The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock in the three months ended June 30, 2002.

The
Company anticipates spending approximately $5.0 million over the next 12 months for capital additions primarily to support manufacturing production, test requirements and development
projects.

Based
on the Company's current working capital position and the available line of credit, the Company believes that sufficient resources will be available to meet the Company's cash
requirements for at least the next 12 months. However, there can be no assurance that future events will not require the Company to seek additional borrowings or capital and, if so required, that such
borrowing or capital will be available on acceptable terms. Factors that could affect cash flow from operations and as

25

---

a result, the Company's need to seek additional short-term and long-term borrowings or capital, include:



The
risks associated with the Company's business and operations also have a significant impact on the Company's liquidity. See "Risks Related to the Proposed Merger" and "Risks Related
to Ongoing Operations" in this section for further discussion on the risks of the Company's business and operations.

Related Party Transactions

Sales to Cingular Wireless LLC.For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and the three months ended July 1, 2001, Cingular
purchased approximately $2.6 million and $29,000 of MCPA products from the Company, respectively. Robert W. Shaner, President of Wireless Operations for Cingular, has served as a member of the
Company's board of directors since April 1999.

Outsourced Stock Option Administration Services.In May of 2000, Spectrian entered into a non-binding arrangement with
Montgomery Financial Services Corp. ("MFS"). MFS provides on-site stock option administration services to the Company. Henry C. Montgomery, Chairman of the Board of MFS, has served as a member of the
Company's board of directors since November 2000. For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and July 1, 2001, the Company purchased services in the amount of $11,000 and $13,000, respectively, from
MFS.

Investment in ArrayComm, Inc.In July of 1998, Spectrian purchased 222,222 shares of Series D preferred stock at $4.50 per
share of ArrayComm, Inc. ("ArrayComm"). The total investment in Arraycomm was $1.0 million. ArrayComm is a privately held company that develops antenna-based wireless communications and broadband
internet access technologies. Martin Cooper, Chief Executive Officer of ArrayComm, has also served as a member of the Company's board of directors since January 1994.

Factors Affecting Future Operating Results

Risks Related to the Proposed Merger

Fluctuations in Merger Consideration.Upon completion of the merger, each share of the Company's common stock will be
converted into the right to receive $14.00 of REMEC common stock, provided that at REMEC's election, REMEC may offer a certain portion of the merger consideration in cash. REMEC may make this election
at any time prior to the fifth business day prior to the special meeting of the Company's stockholders. If REMEC elects not to pay any cash in the merger, the number of shares of REMEC common stock
that will be issued for each share of the Company's common stock shall be equal to $14.00 divided by the average closing price of REMEC common stock during the ten trading days ending on and including
the second trading day prior to the special meeting

26

---

of the Company's stockholders. However, if the average closing price is greater than $10.50 then REMEC shall issue 1.33333 shares of its common stock for each share of the Company's common stock, and
if the average closing price is less than $7.00 then REMEC shall issue 2.0 shares of its common stock for each share of the Company's common stock. Since the market price of REMEC's stock will
fluctuate and since REMEC may elect to pay cash as merger consideration, the Company's stockholders will not know the final exchange ratio until after the market closes on the second trading day prior
to the Company's special stockholder meeting. Accordingly, the specific number of shares of REMEC common stock that the Company's stockholders will receive in the merger will depend upon the market
price of REMEC's common stock at the time the closing of the merger. This price may fluctuate substantially. In addition, the Company is not permitted to withdraw from the merger or resolicit the vote
of its stockholders solely because of changes in the market price of REMEC's common stock or the Company's common stock. The share prices of REMEC and the Company's common stock are subject to the
general price fluctuations in the market for publicly traded equity securities, and the prices of both companies' common stock have experienced significant volatility in the past. The Company urges
its stockholders to obtain recent market quotations for its common stock and for REMEC's common stock. The Company cannot predict or give any assurances as to the respective market prices of the
Company's or REMEC's common stock at any time before or after the closing of the merger, or that the Company's stockholders will receive exactly $14.00 for each share of the Company's common stock.

Customer Delays, Deferrals or Cancellations of Product Orders.The public announcement of the merger could have a material
adverse effect on the Company's revenues and profitability in the short term. In particular, prospective customers could be reluctant to purchase the Company's products if they are uncertain about the
strategic direction of the combined company, the continuation of the Company's product offerings and the willingness of the combined company to support, service and repair existing products. Since the
merger, the Company has received questions from current and prospective customers about the status of the merger and the anticipated product development and integration plans. The merger was announced
on May 19, 2002, in the second half of the Company's first quarter of fiscal 2003. The Company tends to realize a substantial portion of its revenues during the last month of a quarter. Accordingly,
the announcement of the merger could create uncertainty among the Company's current and prospective customers. If one large customer, or a large number of smaller customers, were to delay their
purchase decisions until the completion of the merger, the Company's
quarterly financial results could be significantly below the expectations of market analysts, which could cause a reduction in the market price of the Company's common stock.

Impairment of Existing Relationships.The public announcement of the merger could substantially impair the Company's
important business relationships. Customers and suppliers could decide to terminate or cancel their existing arrangements, or fail to renew those arrangements, as a result of the pending merger. In
addition, key employees may decide to terminate their employment due to the pending merger or other employees may experience uncertainty about their future role with the combined company, which could
adversely affect the Company's ability to retain key management, marketing, sales and technical personnel.

Merger Related Costs.The Company estimates that it will incur direct transaction costs of approximately $3.7 million in
connection with the proposed merger, which will be expensed in the quarter in which they are incurred, reducing the Company's earnings or increasing its loss for that period. A substantial amount of
these costs will be incurred whether or not the merger is completed. For the three months ended June 30, 2002, the Company incurred approximately $1.2 million of legal, accounting and
investment-banking fees associated with the merger.

The
Company believes that the combined entity may incur charges to operations, such as costs associated with combining the businesses of the two companies, restructuring and integration
costs,

27

---

which currently cannot be estimated reasonably, in the quarter in which the merger is completed or the following quarters to reflect costs associated with integrating the Company into REMEC. There
can be no assurance that the combined company will not incur additional material charges in subsequent quarters to reflect additional costs associated with the merger. In addition, a portion of the
merger related costs will be included in the purchase price and capitalized as an element of goodwill. Goodwill is required to be tested for impairment at least annually and the combined company will
be required to record a charge to earnings in any period that impairment of goodwill is determined.

Risks Associated with REMEC's Common Stock.When the merger is completed, holders of the Company's common stock will become
holders of REMEC's common stock. REMEC's business differs greatly from the Company's and REMEC's results of operations, as well as the price of REMEC's common stock, may be affected by factors
different from those affecting the Company's results of operations and the price of the Company's common stock.

Regulatory Approvals of Merger.As a condition to the obligations of the Company and REMEC to complete the merger, the
waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 must have expired or been terminated and the Securities and Exchange Commission must have declared effective a
registration statement pursuant to which the Company's stockholders would be solicited to vote on the proposed merger. The Company and REMEC have made the required filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino
Act with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission and the parties were notified on June 14, 2002, that the waiting period had been terminated. REMEC
filed its registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 21, 2002. There can be no assurance that the Securities and Exchange Commission will declare REMEC's registration
statement effective in a timely manner. Even if regulatory approvals are obtained, any federal, state or foreign governmental entity or any private person may challenge the merger at any time before
or after its completion.

Failure to Complete the Proposed Merger.If the proposed merger is not completed, the Company may be subject to the following
material risks, among others:



Further,
if the merger agreement is terminated and the Company's board of directors determines to seek another merger or business combination, the Company may not be able to find a
partner willing to pay an equivalent or more attractive price than that which would be paid in the merger.

In
addition, while the merger agreement is in effect and subject to certain limited exceptions, the Company is generally prohibited from soliciting, initiating, knowingly encouraging, or
knowingly

28

---

inducing or participating in any discussions regarding a proposal to enter into any business combination with any party other than REMEC.

Risks Related to Ongoing Operations

Customer Concentration; Dependence on Nortel, Verizon, Samsung and Cingular.The wireless infrastructure equipment market is
dominated by a small number of large OEMs and wireless network operators, including Ericsson Wireless Communications, Inc., Nokia OY, Lucent, Motorola Corporation, Samsung, Nortel, Verizon, Cingular
and Siemens AG. The Company's revenues are derived primarily from sales to a limited number of customers, in particular, Nortel, Verizon, Samsung and Cingular. Furthermore, a substantial portion of
the Company's revenues from Nortel in the past has resulted from sales of a limited number of the Company's products. The Company's business, financial condition and results of operations have been
materially adversely affected in the past by anticipated orders failing to materialize, by deferrals or cancellations of orders as a result of changes in customer requirements, and from the timing of
the build out of new wireless networks. The Company and Nortel have a supply agreement, renegotiated annually, pursuant to which Nortel commits to purchase a certain volume of its annual power
amplifier requirements for specified prices from the Company. This agreement allows Nortel to change the product mix requirements, which can significantly affect the Company's gross margins, and to
change requested delivery dates without significant financial consequences to Nortel. In addition, the Company's sales to Verizon, Samsung and Cingular are generally made on the basis of purchase
orders rather than long-term purchase commitments and any of these customers may cancel or defer its purchase orders without advanced notice to the Company. The Company's contractual relationships
with its major customers may adversely affect the Company's ability to efficiently manage production schedules and inventory levels and to accurately forecast product sales. Any reduction in the level
of purchases of the Company's amplifiers by Nortel, Verizon, Samsung or Cingular or any material reduction in pricing without significant offsets would have a material adverse effect on the Company's
business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, in fiscal 2002, product orders from Nortel fell substantially and the Company does not currently sell any MCPA products to Nortel,
which has adversely affected the Company's business. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive any product orders for MCPA products or any other products from Nortel in the future. If
the Company's current or new customers do not generate sufficient demand for the Company's new products to replace prior demand from Nortel, the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially adversely affected. Further, if the Company were to lose Nortel, Verizon, Samsung, Cingular or any other major customer, the Company's business, financial condition and
results of operations would be materially adversely affected. In addition, the network operator market has been and is expected to continue experiencing an industry consolidation, which has and will
continue to have a negative impact on the Company's ability to diversify its customer base. Wireless infrastructure equipment OEMs have come under increasing price pressure from wireless network
operators, which in turn has resulted in downward pricing pressure on the Company's products. The Company expects to incur increasing pricing pressures from Nortel, Verizon, Samsung, Cingular and
other major customers in future periods, which could result in declining average sales prices and gross margins for the Company's products.

Fluctuations in Operating Results.The Company's quarterly and annual results have in the past been, and will continue to be,
subject to significant fluctuations due to a number of factors, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In
particular, the Company's results of operations are likely to vary due to: the timing, cancellation,
delay or rescheduling of OEM and network operator customer orders and shipments; the timing of announcements or introductions of new products by the Company, its competitors or their respective OEM
and network operator customers; the acceptance of such products by wireless equipment OEMs and network operators; relative variations in manufacturing efficiencies and costs; competitive factors such
as the pricing, availability, and demand for competing amplification products;

29

---

changes in average sales prices and related gross margins which vary significantly based upon product mix; subcontractor performance; variations in operating expenses; shortages of key supplies; the
long sales cycles associated with the Company's products; the timing and level of product and process development costs; changes in inventory levels; the relative strength or weakness of international
financial markets and the financial strength of domestic financial markets. Anticipated orders from the Company's customers have in the past failed to materialize and delivery schedules have been
deferred or canceled as a result of changes in customer requirements and the Company expects this pattern to continue as customer requirements continue to change and industry standards continue to
evolve. Reduced demand for wireless infrastructure equipment in the past has caused significant fluctuations in the Company's product sales. For the three months ended June 30, 2002 and fiscal 2002
when compared to the three months ended July 1, 2001 and fiscal 2001, respectively, the Company experienced a significant sales decline as a result of delays and reductions in capital spending by the
Company's customers. There can be no assurance that the Company will not experience such fluctuations in the future or that the Company will experience in the future the same annual revenue growth
that it did in fiscal 2001 and 2000. The Company establishes its expenditure levels for product development and other operating expenses based on its expected revenues, and expenses are relatively
fixed in the short term. As a result, variations in timing of revenues can cause significant variations in quarterly results of operations. At June 30, 2002, the Company had a relatively high level of
inventory on hand. Consequently, if customer demand falls below the Company's forecast, it may experience charges related to excess and obsolete inventory or be required to reduce the carrying value
of inventory to the lower of cost or market. The Company is not currently profitable and there can be no assurance that the Company will be profitable on a quarter-to-quarter or annual basis in the
future. For example, in the three months ended June 30, 2002 and fiscal 2002, the Company incurred inventory obsolescence expenses and loss on adverse purchase commitments of $859,000 and $11.7
million, respectively, due to lower than expected customer demand. The Company believes that period-to-period comparisons of its financial results are not necessarily meaningful and should not be
relied upon as an indication of future performance. Due to all the foregoing factors, it is likely that in some future quarter or quarters the Company's revenues or operating results will not meet the
expectations of public stock market analysts or investors. In such event, the market price of the Company's common stock would be materially adversely affected.

Economic Recession or other Economic Conditions.The Company's revenues are derived primarily from sales to wireless network
operators and OEMs in the wireless infrastructure equipment market. Any significant downturn in the wireless infrastructure equipment market, or domestic or international conditions, which result in
the reduction of capital expenditure budgets or the delay in product orders of the Company's customers would likely produce a decline in demand for the Company's power amplifier products. Since early
2001, the wireless infrastructure equipment market has experienced a significant decline in revenue and product orders. If the Company's customers decide to delay their product orders or reduce their
capital expenditures, the Company's revenues, results of operations and financial condition would be adversely affected.

Declining Average Sales Prices.The Company has experienced, and expects to continue to experience, declining average sales
prices for all of its products, especially its SCPAs, and in all geographical markets. Wireless infrastructure equipment manufacturers have come under increasing price pressure from wireless network
operators, which in turn has resulted in downward pricing pressure on the Company's products. In addition, competition among merchant amplifier suppliers has increased the downward pricing pressure on
the Company's products and certain customer contracts have pricing terms that allow these customers to purchase the Company's products at the lowest available market price. Since wireless
infrastructure equipment manufacturers frequently negotiate supply arrangements far in advance of delivery dates, the Company often must commit to price reductions for its products before it is aware
of how, or if, cost reductions can be obtained. To offset declining average sales prices, the Company believes that it must achieve manufacturing cost

30

---

reductions. If the Company is unable to achieve such cost reductions, the Company's gross margins will decline, and such decline will have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.

Product Quality, Performance and Reliability.The Company expects that its customers will continue to establish demanding
specifications for quality, performance and reliability that must be met by the Company's products. Power amplifiers as complex as those offered by the Company may encounter development delays and may
contain undetected defects or failures. The Company has from time to time in the past experienced product quality, performance and reliability problems. In addition, the Company's MCPA products have a
higher statistical probability of malfunction than its SCPA products due to their greater complexity. There can be no assurance that defects or failures relating to the Company's product quality,
performance and reliability will not occur in the future that may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Internal Amplifier Design and Production Capabilities of OEMs.The Company believes that a majority of the present worldwide
production of power amplifiers is captive within the manufacturing operations of wireless equipment OEMs, many of which have chosen not to purchase a significant volume of amplifiers from outside
suppliers. In addition, these manufacturers could decide to sell amplifiers to other wireless equipment OEMs, either through direct sales or by spinning out their amplifier division as a separate
entity. If this should occur, the competition for power amplifiers would significantly increase and could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of
operations.

The
Company also believes that those OEMs that purchase from third party amplifier vendors are reluctant to switch once committed to a particular merchant vendor. Consequently, the
Company has only limited opportunities to increase revenues by replacing internal OEM amplifier production or displacing other merchant amplifier suppliers. Moreover, given the limited opportunities
for merchant power amplifier suppliers, any decision by an OEM to employ a second source merchant supplier for a product currently purchased from a merchant supplier may reduce the existing merchant
supplier's ability to maintain a given level of product sales to such OEM or, possibly, to retain the OEM as a customer due to price competition from the second source merchant supplier. There can be
no assurance that the Company's major OEM customers will continue to rely, or increase their reliance, on the Company as an external source of supply for their power amplifiers, or that other wireless
equipment OEMs will become customers of the Company. If the major wireless infrastructure
equipment suppliers do not purchase or do not continue to purchase their power amplifiers from merchant suppliers, the Company's business, results of operations and financial condition will be
materially adversely affected.

Rapid Technological Change; Evolving Industry Standards; Dependence on New Products.The markets in which the Company and its OEM
customers compete are characterized by rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and continuous improvements in products and services. In particular, because the Company's strategy of
rapidly bringing to market products customized for numerous and evolving modulation standards requires developing and achieving volume production of a large number of distinct products, the Company's
ability to rapidly design and produce individual products for which there is significant OEM customer demand will be a critical determinant of the Company's future success. A softening of demand in
the markets served by the Company or a failure of modulation standard in which the Company has invested substantial development resources may have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. No assurance can be given that the Company's product development efforts will be successful, that its new products will meet customer requirements and be
accepted or that its OEM customers' product offerings will achieve customer acceptance. If a significant number of development projects, including the Company's new MCPA products, do not result in
substantial volume production or if technologies

31

---

or standards supported by the Company's or its customers' products become obsolete or fail to gain widespread commercial acceptance, the Company's business may be materially adversely affected.

Purchase and Supply Agreement with Cree.In connection with the Company's completion of the sale of UltraRF to Cree, the
Company entered into a Purchase and Supply Agreement with UltraRF, a subsidiary of Cree. Pursuant to the Purchase and Supply Agreement, as amended, the Company is committed to purchase and accept
delivery from UltraRF of $54.8 million of semiconductors over a 30-month period starting January 2001. As of June 30, 2002, the Company's remaining purchase commitment was
$16.3 million. The quarterly purchase commitment is $5.0 million for the quarters ended September 29, 2002, December 29, 2002 and March 31, 2003 and $1.3 million for
the quarter ended June 29, 2003. The Company's need for UltraRF components during a quarter may be insufficient to satisfy its minimum commitments for such quarter. In such event, the Company
would be obligated to purchase excess inventory that it may never utilize or to pay a shortfall surcharge in cash, either of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and cash flow.

The
Company relies on UltraRF for the supply of a substantial amount of components used in the manufacture of its products. When the Company operated UltraRF as a separate division, it
may have obtained more favorable terms for semiconductor products than through negotiations with unaffiliated third parties. With the sale of UltraRF, the Company must now deal with UltraRF on an
arm's-length basis. Accordingly, the prices and other terms for UltraRF semiconductor products are less favorable to the Company than prior to the sale of UltraRF to Cree, which adversely affects the
Company's gross margin.

Sole or Limited Sources of Products, Materials and Services.The Company currently procures from single sources certain of
its power amplifier assemblies, specialized semiconductors, components and services for its products. The Company purchases these products, components and services on a purchase order basis, generally
does not carry significant inventories of these components and does not have any long-term supply contracts with its sole source vendors. In fiscal 2001, the Company completed the transfer of the
production of power amplifiers to a contract manufacturer in Thailand. As a result of this transfer, the Company no longer has significant manufacturing capacity. The Company issues non-cancelable
purchase orders to the contract manufacturer 60 days in advance of requested delivery, which is longer than the committed delivery schedule of some of its customers, such as Nortel. In addition, the
Company completed the transfer of its power amplifier repair and product integration operations in June 2002. As a result of this transfer, the Company no longer has significant amplifier repair
capacity. Additionally, as a result of the sale of UltraRF to Cree, the Company no longer manufactures bipolar and LDMOS RF power semiconductors, which are critical components in the Company's power
amplifier products. Consequently, Cree is the Company's sole source vendor of certain bipolar and LDMOS RF power semiconductors. The Company's reliance on sole sources for certain components and its
migration to an outsourced, turnkey manufacturing and repair services strategy entail certain risks including reduced control over the price, timely delivery, reliability and quality of the components
and reliance on the financial strength and continued relationship with the contract manufacturer. In calendar 2001, the Company believed that the financial strength of the Company's primary sole
source contract manufacturer may have become impaired due to the declaration of bankruptcy by its U.S. parent corporation. However, in July 2002, Benchmark Electronics, Inc, a provider of electronics
manufacturing and design services, acquired the contract manufacturer. If the Company were to change any of its sole source vendors or contract manufacturer, the Company would be required to requalify
its components with each new vendor or contract manufacturer, respectively, as well as with each of its customers. Any inability of the Company to obtain timely deliveries of components, repair
services, assembled amplifiers or RF power semiconductors of acceptable quality in required quantities or a significant increase in the prices of components for which the Company does not have
alternative sources could materially and adversely

32

---

affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company has occasionally experienced difficulties in obtaining some components, and no assurance can be given that
shortages will not occur in the future.

Risks of International Sales.The Company operates in an international market and expects that sales outside of the United
States will continue to account for a significant percentage of the Company's total revenues for the next 12 months. These sales involve a number of inherent risks, including terrorist attacks on U.S.
companies, imposition of government controls, currency exchange fluctuations, potential insolvency of international distributors, representatives, vendors and customers, reduced protection of
intellectual property rights in some countries, the impact of recessionary environments in economies outside the United States, political instability and generally longer receivables collection
periods, as well as tariffs and other trade barriers. In addition, where the Company sells its products in U.S. dollars, increases in the value of the dollar relative to the local currency would
increase the price of the Company's products in foreign markets and make the Company's products relatively more expensive than competitors' products that are priced in local currencies. Where the
Company sells its products in foreign currencies, the Company may be unable to increase or decrease the prices for its products in a timely fashion to reflect fluctuations in the exchange rate which
would reduce the competitiveness of the Company's prices and result in lower revenues. Furthermore, foreign governments or regulatory bodies may in the future impose currency restrictions or controls
which would impair or prohibit the Company's ability to exchange its funds from foreign currencies into U.S. dollars, thereby adversely affecting the Company's business, financial condition and
results of
operations. There can be no assurance that these factors will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's future international sales and, consequently, on the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations, and the Company has determined not to engage in hedging activities to mitigate any of these risks.

The
Company anticipates that turmoil in financial markets and the deterioration of the underlying economic conditions in certain countries where the Company has significant sales may
have an impact on its sales to customers located in or whose projects are based in those countries due to the impact of currency fluctuations on the relative price of the Company's products and
restrictions on government spending imposed by the International Monetary Fund (the "IMF") on those countries receiving the IMF's assistance. In addition, customers in those countries may face reduced
access to working capital to fund component purchases, such as the Company's products, due to higher interest rates, reduced funding of wireless infrastructure by domestic governments, reduced bank
lending due to contractions in the money supply or the deterioration in the customer's or its bank's financial condition or the inability to access equity financing. A substantial majority of the
Company's products are sold to OEMs who incorporate the Company's products into systems sold and installed to end-user customers. These OEMs are not required by contract and do not typically provide
the Company with information regarding the location and identity of their end-user customers, and therefore the Company is not able to determine what portion of its product sales have been or future
orders will be incorporated into OEM sales to end-users in countries experiencing financial market turmoil or deterioration of economic conditions. Furthermore, a large portion of the Company's
existing customers and potential new customers are servicing new markets in developing countries that the Company's customers expect will deploy wireless communication networks as an alternative to
the construction of a wireline infrastructure. If such countries decline to construct wireless communication systems, or construction of such systems is delayed for any reason, including business and
economic conditions and changes in economic stability due to factors such as increased inflation and political turmoil, such delays could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations.

Reliance upon Growth of Wireless Services.Sales of power amplifiers to wireless infrastructure equipment suppliers and
network operators have in the past accounted, and are expected in the future to account, for substantially all of the Company's product sales. Demand for wireless infrastructure equipment is driven by
demand for wireless service. If demand for wireless services fails to increase or increases more slowly than the Company or its customers currently anticipate, the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations would be materially and adversely affected.

33

---



Market for the Company's Products is Highly Competitive.The wireless communications equipment industry is extremely
competitive and is characterized by rapid technological change, new product development and product obsolescence, evolving industry standards and significant price erosion over the life of a product.
The ability of the Company to compete successfully and achieve profitability depends in part upon the rates at which wireless equipment OEMs incorporate the Company's products into their systems and
the Company captures market share from other merchant suppliers. The Company's major OEM customers continuously evaluate whether to manufacture their own amplification products or purchase them from
outside sources. There can be no assurance that these OEM customers will incorporate the Company's products into their systems or that in general they will continue to rely, or expand their reliance,
on external sources of supply for their power amplifiers. These customers and other large manufacturers of wireless communications equipment could also elect to enter the merchant market and compete
directly with the Company, and at least two OEMs, NEC Corporation and Lucent, have already done so. Such increased competition could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial
condition and results of operations.

The
Company's principal competitors in the market for wireless amplification products provided by merchant suppliers currently include, Andrew, Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi Kokusai Electric
Inc., Japan Radio Co. Ltd., Mitsubishi Corporation, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. (doing business as "Panasonic"), Paradigm Communications, Inc., Powerwave and REMEC. No assurance can be
given that the Company's competitors will not develop new technologies or enhancements to existing products or introduce new products that will offer superior price or performance features compared to
the Company's products.

Risk of Licensed or Acquired Technologies.The wireless communications equipment industry is very competitive, and as such,
the Company's growth is substantially dependent upon its ability to enhance its existing products and introduce new products on a timely basis. The Company has addressed in part its need to improve
existing products and develop new products through the licensing of externally developed technologies and through the acquisition of such technologies by investing in other companies. The licensing or
acquisition of externally developed technologies involves certain risks including difficulties in integrating the third party's technology into the Company's products, lack of control over the
reliability, timely delivery and quality of such technology and the failure of the Company to realize additional revenue associated with such technology which can offset the license payments, the
initial investment and related costs of such technology. If any of these risks materialize, the Company's license agreements or investments in externally developed technologies may not be financially
successful and may adversely affect the Company's business, operating results and financial condition.

Uncertain Protection of Intellectual Property.The Company's ability to compete successfully and achieve future revenue
growth will depend, in part, on its ability to protect its proprietary technology and operate without infringing the rights of others. The Company has a policy of seeking patents on inventions
resulting from its ongoing research and development activities. There can be no assurance that the Company's pending patent applications will be granted or that the issued or pending patents will not
be challenged or circumvented by competitors. In addition, the Company assigned 20 of its United States patents and 4 of its foreign patents to Cree in connection with the sale of UltraRF. Cree
granted the Company a non-exclusive, royalty-free license to each of these patents; however, there can be no assurance that Cree will adequately protect this proprietary information. The Company
generally enters into confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements with its employees, suppliers, customers and potential customers and limits access to and distribution of its proprietary technology.
However, there can be no assurance that such measures will provide adequate protection for the Company's trade secrets or other proprietary information, or that the Company's trade secrets or
proprietary technology will not otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors. The failure of the

34

---

Company to protect its proprietary technology could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition and results of operations.

Risk of Third Party Claims of Infringement.The communications equipment industry is characterized by vigorous protection and
pursuit of intellectual property rights or positions, which have resulted in significant and often protracted and expensive litigation. Although there is currently no pending intellectual property
litigation against the Company, the Company or its suppliers may from time to time be notified of claims that the Company may be infringing patents or other intellectual property rights owned by third
parties. If it is necessary or desirable, the Company may seek licenses under such patents or other intellectual property rights. However, there can be no assurance that licenses will be offered or
that the terms of any offered licenses will be acceptable to the Company. The failure to obtain a license from a third party for technology used by the Company or otherwise secure rights to use such
technology could cause the Company to incur substantial liabilities, suspend the manufacture of products or expend significant resources to develop noninfringing technology. There can be no assurance
that the Company would be successful in such development or that such licenses would be available on reasonable terms, if at all. In the event that any third party makes a successful claim against the
Company or its customers and either a license is not made available to the Company on commercially reasonable terms or a "design around" is not practicable, the Company's business, financial condition
and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. In addition, the Company remains liable for any potential claims, losses or expenses incurred by Cree as a direct or indirect result
of any inaccuracy or breach of the intellectual property, taxes or environmental representations and warranties made by the Company in connection with the sale of UltraRF. The Company's liability for
any such claim, loss or expense is unlimited, and therefore the filing of such a claim against Cree or the Company could materially adversely affect the Company's financial condition.

Furthermore,
the Company may initiate claims or litigation against third parties for infringement of the Company's proprietary rights or to establish the validity of the Company's
proprietary rights. Litigation by or against the Company could result in significant expense to the Company and divert the efforts of the Company's technical and management personnel, whether or not
such litigation results in a favorable determination for the Company. In the event of an adverse result in any such litigation, the Company could be required to pay substantial damages, indemnify its
customers, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, expend significant resources to develop noninfringing technology, discontinue the use of certain processes or obtain licenses to
the infringing technology.

Government Regulation of Communications Industry.RF transmissions and emissions, and certain equipment used in connection
with RF transmission or emissions are regulated in the United States, Canada and throughout the rest of the world. Regulatory approvals generally must be obtained by the Company in connection with the
manufacture and sale of its products, and by wireless network operators to operate the Company's products. The United States Federal Communications Commission (the "FCC") and regulatory authorities
abroad constantly review RF emission issues and promulgate standards based on such reviews. If more stringent RF emission regulations are adopted, the Company and its OEM customers may be required to
alter the manner in which radio signals are transmitted or otherwise alter the equipment transmitting such signals, which could materially adversely affect the Company's products and markets. The
enactment by federal, state, local or international governments of new laws or regulations or a change in the interpretation of existing regulations could also materially adversely affect the market
for the Company's products. For example, recently enacted laws and regulations which prohibit or restrict the use of hand held cellular telephones while operating a motor vehicle may have a material
adverse affect on the market for the Company's products. Although deregulation of international communications industries along with radio frequency spectrum allocations made by the FCC have increased
the potential demand for the Company's products by providing users of those products with opportunities to establish new wireless personal communications services, there can be no assurance that the
trend toward deregulation and current regulatory

35

---

developments favorable to the promotion of new and expanded personal communications services will continue or that other future regulatory changes will have a positive impact on the Company.
Recently, the auction of new frequency spectrums has been delayed by the FCC. The increasing demand for wireless communications has exerted pressure on regulatory bodies worldwide to adopt new
standards for such products, generally following extensive investigation of and deliberation over competing technologies. However, the delays inherent in this governmental approval process and the
current uncertainty surrounding the ownership and allocation of wireless spectrum licenses have in the past caused, and may in the future cause, the cancellation, postponement or rescheduling of the
FCC auction of spectrum licenses and the installation of communications systems by the Company's OEM customers. These delays have had in the past, and in the future may have, a material adverse effect
on the sale of products by the Company to such OEM customers.

Environmental Regulations.The Company is subject to a variety of local, state and federal governmental regulations relating
to the storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture and disposal of toxic or other hazardous substances used to manufacture the Company's products. The Company believes that it is
currently in compliance in all material respects with such regulations and that it has obtained all necessary environmental permits to conduct its business. Nevertheless, the failure to comply with
current or future regulations could result in the imposition of substantial fines on the Company, suspension of production, alteration of its manufacturing processes or cessation of operations.
Compliance with such regulations could require the Company to acquire expensive remediation equipment or to incur substantial expenses. Any failure by the Company to control the use, disposal, removal
or storage of, or to adequately restrict the discharge of, or assist in the cleanup of, hazardous or toxic substances could subject the Company to significant liabilities, including joint and several
liabilities under certain statutes. The imposition of such liabilities could materially adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, the Company
is liable for any potential claim, loss or expense incurred by Cree as a result of any inaccuracy or breach of the environmental representations and warranties made by the Company in connection with
the sale of UltraRF.

Dependence on Key Personnel.The nature of the Company's business and the industry in which it operates, including
significant fluctuation in revenue levels, has placed, and is expected to continue to place, a significant strain on the Company's personnel, management and other resources. The Company's ability to
manage the volatile nature its business effectively will require it to attract, motivate, manage and retain new employees successfully, to integrate new employees into its overall operations and to
retain the continued service of its key technical, marketing and management personnel, and to continue to improve its operational, financial and management information systems. Although the Company
has employment contracts with several of its executive officers, these agreements do not obligate such individuals to remain in the employment of the Company. The Company does not maintain key person
life insurance on any of its key technical personnel. The competition for such personnel is intense. The Company has experienced loss of key employees in the past and could in the future. Such losses
could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

The
Company's ability to manage the volatile nature of its business will require it to continue to invest in its operational, financial and management information systems, procedures and
controls. Failure to do this effectively would have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company may, from time to time, pursue the
acquisition of other companies, technology, assets or product lines that complement or expand its existing business. The Company may also, from time to time, pursue divestitures of existing
operations, technology or assets. Acquisitions and divestitures involve a number of risks that could adversely affect the Company's operating results. These risks include the diversion of management's
attention from day-to-day business, the fluctuation of operating results due to the timing of charges for costs associated with acquisitions or divestitures, the difficulty of combining and
assimilating the operations and personnel of the acquired

36

---

companies, the difficulty of separating a divested operation from the remaining operations, charges to the Company's earnings as a result of the purchase of intangible assets, and the potential loss
of key employees as a result of an acquisition or divestiture. Should any acquisition or divestiture take place, the Company can give no assurance that this transaction will not materially and
adversely affect the Company or that any such transaction will enhance the Company's business.

Risk of Business Interruption.The Company's operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss,
telecommunications failure and other events beyond the Company's control. The Company does not have a detailed disaster recovery plan and its facilities in the State of California have been in the
past subject to electrical blackouts as a consequence of a shortage of available electrical power. In the event these blackouts occur in the future, they could disrupt the operations of the Company's
facilities in California and increase the Company's operating costs. In addition, the Company does not carry sufficient business interruption insurance to compensate it for losses that may occur and
any losses or damages incurred could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business.

Volatility of Stock Price.The market price of the Company's stock has been and is likely to continue to be highly volatile,
and is affected significantly by factors such as fluctuations in the Company's quarterly and annual operating results, customer concentration, reliance on single source vendors, reliance on outsource
manufacturing, the timing difference between its customers' requested delivery dates and its
vendor purchase commitments to support the customer's delivery requirements, reliance on international markets, the absence of the economies of scale achieved by some of its competitors, announcements
of technological innovations, new customer contracts or new products by the Company or its competitors, announcements by the Company's customers regarding their business or prospects, changes in
analysts' expectations, estimates and recommendations, news reports regarding the Company, its competitors and its markets, governmental regulatory action, developments with respect to patents or
proprietary rights, announcements of significant acquisitions or strategic partnerships by the Company or its competitors, announcements of significant divestitures of existing businesses or product
lines, concentration of stock ownership by a few entities resulting in a low float of the Company's common stock in the public market, a significant short interest ownership position in the Company's
common stock, general market conditions and other factors. The market price of the Company's common stock has ranged from a low of $6.07 to a high of $16.05 during the period from April 1, 2002 to
July 31, 2002. In addition, the stock market in general, and the market prices for power amplifier manufacturers in particular, have experienced extreme volatility that is often unrelated to the
operating performance of these companies. These broad market and industry fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Company's common stock, regardless of actual operating performance. The
market price of the Company's common stock has fluctuated significantly in the past.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The Company develops products in the United States and markets its products in North America, South America, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region. Thus, the
financial results could be affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange rates or weak economic conditions in foreign markets. As the Company's sales are primarily denominated in
U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the dollar could make the Company's products less competitive in foreign markets. In addition, a portion of the Company's international product revenues (primarily in
China) and repair revenues (primarily in South Korea) are denominated in foreign currencies. In situations where that the Company bills and receives local currencies, the Company may be restricted or
impaired from exchanging the local currency into U.S. dollars due to expatriation laws or regulations in foreign countries which would adversely affect the Company's operations and financial
condition. As of June 30, 2002, the recorded values of cash and accounts receivable in Chinese Yuan and Korean Won were $1.9 million and $557,000, respectively, in the aggregate.

37

---

The
Company's exposure to market rate risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to its investment portfolio. The Company does not hold derivative financial instruments in its
investment portfolio. The Company places its investments with high quality institutions and limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. The Company is averse to principal loss and ensures
the safety and preservation of its invested funds by limiting default, market and reinvestment risk. The Company classifies its short-term investments as "fixed-rate" if the rate of return on such
instruments remains fixed over their term. These "fixed-rate" investments include fixed-rate U.S. government securities and corporate obligations with contractual maturity dates ranging from less than
one year up to five years. The table below presents the amounts and related weighted interest rates of the Company's short-term investments at June 30, 2002 and March 31, 2002 (dollars in thousands).

June 30,
2002

March 31,
2002Average fixed interest rate


2.8
%

3.6
%Amortized cost

$
46,328

$
48,374Fair value

$
46,591

$
48,585Contractual maturity dates:Less than 1 year

$
9,296

$
13,4661 to 5 years


37,295


35,119$
46,591

$
48,585


38

---



PART IIOTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Litigation

A
putative class action lawsuit was filed in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara on May 28, 2002, captioned Vogel v. Shaner, et al., Case No. CV808140.
The complaint names six of the Company's directors and its chief executive officer as defendants. In the complaint, the plaintiff alleges that the defendants violated their fiduciary duties owed to
the Company's stockholders, including their duties of loyalty, good faith and independence, by engaging in self-dealing in the merger transaction with REMEC. This violation allegedly stemmed from the
defendants' failure to properly value the Company in the merger and due to conflicts of interest. The plaintiff purportedly brought his action on behalf of Company stockholders who are or would be
harmed by the alleged conduct. The case seeks declaratory, injunctive and other forms of relief. The Company and the defendant directors and officer believe that the lawsuit is without merit and
intends to defend the case vigorously.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

In accord with Section 10A(i)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as added by Section 202 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company is responsible for
listing the non-audit services in the three months ended June 30, 2002 that were performed by PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP, the Company's external auditor. Non-audit services are defined in the law as
services other than those provided in connection with an audit or a review of the financial statements of the company. The non-audit services in the three months ended June 30, 2002 were each
considered by the Company to be audit-related services which are closely related to the financial audit process.

During
the quarterly period covered by this filing, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP was engaged for the following non-audit services: (1) tax preparation and advice services and (2) services
related to due diligence reviews in connection with the Company's proposed merger with REMEC, Inc. and preparation of Securities and Exchange Commission filings in connection with such merger.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

|Exhibit
Number |  | Description                                                                                               
|-------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|10.56         |  | Master Supply Agreement dated as of August 14, 2001 by and between Registrant and Cingular Wireless L.L.C.
|99.1           |  | Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.                                    

---



39

---



40

---



SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
thereunto duly authorized.

| |  | SPECTRIAN CORPORATION(Registrant)
| |  | ---------------------------------
| |  | By:                              
| |  | By:                              

Dated:
August 14, 2002

41

---

QuickLinks