alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3454 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3454

To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and 
     the Secretary of Energy to conduct a fuel system requirements 
              harmonization study, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2015

Mrs. Walorski introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency and 
     the Secretary of Energy to conduct a fuel system requirements 
              harmonization study, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gas Accessibility and Stabilization 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY.

    Section 211(c)(4)(C) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 7545(c)(4)(C)) 
is amended--
            (1) in clause (ii)(II), by inserting ``a problem with 
        distribution or delivery equipment that is necessary for the 
        transportation or delivery of fuel or fuel additives,'' after 
        ``equipment failure,'';
            (2) in clause (iii)(II), by inserting ``(except that the 
        Administrator may extend the effectiveness of a waiver for more 
        than 20 days if the Administrator determines that the 
        conditions under clause (ii) supporting a waiver determination 
        will exist for more than 20 days)'' before the semicolon at the 
        end;
            (3) by redesignating the second clause (v) (relating to the 
        authority of the Administrator to approve certain State 
        implementation plans) as clause (vi); and
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(vii) Presumptive Approval.--Notwithstanding any other provision 
of this subparagraph, if the Administrator does not approve or deny a 
request for a waiver under this subparagraph within 3 days after 
receipt of the request, the request shall be considered to be approved 
as received by the Administrator and the applicable fuel standards 
shall be waived for the period of time requested.''.

SEC. 3. FUEL SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS HARMONIZATION STUDY.

    Section 1509 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (Public Law 109-58; 
119 Stat. 1083) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(A), by inserting ``biofuels,'' 
                after ``oxygenated fuel,''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(G), by striking ``Tier II'' 
                and inserting ``Tier III''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1), by striking ``2008'' and 
        inserting ``2016''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
32.1







CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002










I, Scott
Rewick, certify that:




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Adex Media, Inc. (the
“Company”) for the
period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Rewick,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
November 13, 2009




/s/
      Scott RewickScott
      RewickChief
      Executive Officer
                    (Principal
      Executive
Officer)
#### The Iowa Mortgage Co. v. Shanquest et al.

1. Mechanic’s Lien: mortgage: priority. Where all the lumber for a building was furnished under one contract, and a statement for a mechanic’s lien was filed within ninety days from the furnishing of the last item, *held*that a lien accrued which bound the property from the date of the last item, and that a mortgage upon the property made after that date was inferior to the mechanic’s lien, though filed before the statement for the lien.

*Appeal from Audubon Distriet Court.*

Friday, October 29.

ActioN to foreclose a mortgage. The Green Bay Lumber Company was made defendant, as claiming a lien upon the land. The company appeared and filed a cross-petition, setting up that the mortgagor, Shanquest, purchased of it, by contract made in June, 1883, lumber for the erection of a frame barn, etc., on the premises in question, and that the lumber was furnished under the contract at different dates from June 29, 1883, to August 16, 1884, and that a statement for a mechanic’s lien was filed October 28,1884, which was within ninety days from the furnishing of the last item of lumber. The company prayed that its lien be established, and be decreed to be paramount to the plaintiff’s mortgage filed for record November 27,1883. The plaintiff demurred to the cross-petition of the lumber company in these words: “ (1) The facts stated in the cross-petition do not entitle *125said defendant to tbe relief demanded. (2) The said cross-petition shows upon its face that the same is founded upon, and seelcs priority over, the plaintiff ’s mortgage, by reason of a claim for a mechanic’s lien, and that no statement thereof and affidavit, as provided by law, has been filed within the prescribed time. (3) The said cross-petition shows that priority, as claimed, over plaintiff’s mortgage, by reason of a mechanic’s lien set out therein, and that the statement thereof was filed too late to entitle the defendant to the relief demanded.” The court sustained the demurrer, and, the lumber company electing to stand upon its cross petition, the court decreed the plaintiff’s mortgage to be paramount to the lien of the lumber company. From the decree the lumber company appeals.

*Berryhill (& Henry*and *A. T.*Bennett, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

Adams, Oh. J.

The statement being filed within ninety days from the furnishing of the last item, and the whole being furnished under one contract, a lien accrued which bound the property, as against the plaintiff, for all the lumber furnished under the contract, and from the furnishing of the first item, which was before the plaintiff’s mortgage attached.

The demurrer assails the sufficiency of the affidavit made to the statement for a lien, but no specific objection is pointed out, and we conclude that there is none. ¥e see no ground upon which the priority of the mechanic’s lien over the mortgage can properly be denied. Ve think that the court erred.

REVERSED.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Adex Media, Inc.. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Scott Rewick, Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that to my knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.






Date:
August 14, 2008




/s/
      Scott RewickScott
      RewickChief
      Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)








[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Adex Media, Inc. and will be retained by Adex Media, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
Exhibit 32.2











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Sterling Oil and Gas Company (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard G. Stifel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 10th day of  January, 2011.





/s/ Richard G. StifelRichard G. StifelChief Financial Officer
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A2 2 A0 56 0 . DENNI S A. BROW N v . AMY McCRORY BROW N.

Den n i s A. Bro w n an d A m y M cCro ry Bro w n were d iv o rced i n 2 0 13

. Th e fi n al

o rd er an d d ecree o f d i v o rce i nco rp o r a t e d a s et t l em en t ag reem en t an d a s ep arat e

“ Term s o f Sal e Ag reem en t ” ad d res s i n g t h e d i s p o s i t i o n of t h e m ari t al res i d en ce. Am y

s u b s eq u en t l y fi l ed a m o t io n fo r co n tem p t, al l eg i n g t h at Den n i s h ad v io l at ed th e Term s

o f Sal e Ag reem en t wh en h e refu s ed t o al lo w her to ex erci se her ri g h t t o p u rch as e t h e

p ro p ert y

. In Sep t em

b er, 2 0 21

, t h e t ri al co u rt en tered an o rd er h o l d i n g D e n n i s in

co n tem p t an d req u i ri n g h i m t o s el l Am y h i s i n t eres t i n t h e m ari tal res i d en ce u n d er t h e

t erm s o f th e p art i es ’ ag reem en t. Den n i s fi led t h i s di rect ap p eal fro m t h at ord er. W e,

h o wev er, l ack ju ri s di ct i o n.

In h i s n o t i ce o f ap peal

, Den n i s as sert s h e h as t h e ri g h t t o a d i rect ap p eal u n d er

OCGA § 5 -6 -3 4 (a) (2 ). Ap p eal s fro m o rd ers i n d o m es t i c rel at i o n s cas es

, h o wev er,

i n cl u d i n g o rd ers h o l d i ng o r d ecl i n i n g t o h o ld p ers o n s i n co n t em p t, m u s t b e p u rs u ed

b y d i s cret i o n ary ap pl icat i o n

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 5 (a) (2 ); R u s s o v. Ma n n i ng

, 2 5 2 Ga.

1 5 5

, 1 5 5 (3 1 2 SE2 d 3 1 9 ) (1 9 8 4 )

. A nd “ [f] ai l u re to fo l l o w th e d i s cret i o n ary

p ro ced ures wh en req ui red d ep ri v es t h i s co u rt of ju ri s d i ct i o n

. ” In t h e In t er es t o f C. M.

L.

, 2 6 0 Ga. Ap p

. 5 02

, 5 0 3 (1 ) (5 8 0 SE2 d 2 7 6) (2 0 0 3 ). D en n i s Bro wn ’ s fai l u re to

fo l l o w t h e d i s cret i o nary ap p eal p ro ced u re, t h erefo re, d ep ri v es u s o f ju ri s d i ct i o n o v er

t h i s d i rect ap peal , wh i ch i s h ereb y DISM ISSED. November 18, 2021C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

I c e r t i f y t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a tr u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

.

W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d t h e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 11/18/2021
Table of Contents


EXHIBIT 32(b)




CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT




I, Gregory A. Smith, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:




(1.)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and




(2.)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  August 10, 2009




/s/ Gregory A. Smith_____________________________


Gregory A. Smith


Chief Financial Officer


Marshall & Ilsley Corporation




This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.







90
# L_2012300EN.01003401.xml

| 30.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 300/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 300/34

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 9 October 2012

on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius

(2012/670/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2), in conjunction with Article 218(5) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Union negotiated with the Republic of Mauritius a Fisheries Partnership Agreement, providing EU vessels with fishing opportunities in the waters over which Republic of Mauritius exercises its sovereignty or jurisdiction. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Union negotiated with the Republic of Mauritius a Fisheries Partnership Agreement, providing EU vessels with fishing opportunities in the waters over which Republic of Mauritius exercises its sovereignty or jurisdiction.

| (2) | As a result of these negotiations, a Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (‘the Fisheries Partnership Agreement’) was initialled on 23 February 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As a result of these negotiations, a Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius (‘the Fisheries Partnership Agreement’) was initialled on 23 February 2012.

| (3) | The Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of Mauritius on fishing in Mauritian waters (1) is to be replaced by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Government of Mauritius on fishing in Mauritian waters (1) is to be replaced by the Fisheries Partnership Agreement.

| (4) | The Fisheries Partnership Agreement should be signed, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The Fisheries Partnership Agreement should be signed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The signing of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Mauritius is hereby authorised on behalf of the Union, subject to its conclusion (2).

Article 2

The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person(s) empowered to sign the Fisheries Partnership Agreement on behalf of the Union.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 9 October 2012.

For the Council

The President

V. SHIARLY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 159, 10.6.1989, p. 2.

1

(2)  The text of the Agreement will be published together with the decision on its conclusion.

2

---
June 25, 2015 

Mr. Timothy Wood 

5085 Copper Bar Road 

Las Cruces, NM 88011 

Dear Mr. Wood: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your June 15, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2257), 

but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not 

comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any 

further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China SHESAYS
Medical Cosmetology Inc. (the "Company"), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC")
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

i.) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

ii.) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and will be furnished to the
SEC or its staff upon request.

|Date: November 15, 2010 | By: /s/ Yixiang
      Zhang   
|----------------------- | ------------------------------
|                        | Name: Yixiang Zhang           
|                        | Title: Chief Executive Officer

---
Exhibit 32.1

MF Global Holdings Ltd.

Certification of the Chief
Executive Officer

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MF Global Holdings Ltd. (together with its subsidiaries, the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bernard W. Dan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: February 5, 2010



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/S/    BERNARD W.
DAN  
|Bernard W. Dan         
|Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a)


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, J.
Michael Pearson, certify that:




1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Orion Marine Group,
Inc.;




2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) 
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) 
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




(c) 
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5.  The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) 
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) 
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.






By:
            /s/
      J. Michael PearsonAugust
      8, 2008
            J.
      Michael PearsonPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer