alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-6 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-6 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 23, 2015
# Centrifuge Science Section

### **Centrifuge Science**

*We perform basic and applied research and development of gas centrifuge technology to meet the critical needs of the U.S. Government.*
                        - ***Dynamic Testing*** — We ensure centrifuge components and subcomponents function as designed. *Responsible for evaluating centrifuge concepts through dynamic testing of prototype systems. Members of this group develop dynamic testing hardware and software, develop and apply advanced rotor balancing techniques, and perform field testing of deployed systems.*
                        - ***Flow, Thermal, and Data Science*** — We perform modeling to ensure optimum enrichment performance of gas centrifuges and are also involved in EMIS and plasma analysis. *Applies first principles and empirical approaches to develop gas centrifuge concepts and perform engineering analysis. Members of this group work to advance the physics and engineering understanding of gas centrifuge systems and apply advanced theoretical and engineering analysis principles to machine design and development.*
                        - ***Gas Testing Science*******— We plan and direct gas testing of individual centrifuges and test cascades to discover nuances of centrifuge performance and ensure centrifuges meet their performance targets. *Responsible for the development and interpretation of testing experiments. This group leads the application of machine and cascade theory to develop, execute, and interpret testing evolutions for discovery, performance evaluation, and optimization of enrichment systems.*
                        - ***Mechanical Systems Modeling*** — We plan and direct gas testing of individual centrifuges and test cascades to discover nuances of centrifuge performance and ensure centrifuges meet their performance targets. *Responsible for the development and interpretation of testing experiments. This group leads the application of machine and cascade theory to develop, execute, and interpret testing evolutions for discovery, performance evaluation, and optimization of enrichment systems.*

### Contact

MattT Bement

bementmt@ornl.gov
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The
undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Touchmark Bancshares, Inc. (the Company), each certify that, to his knowledge on the date of this certification:

1. The quarterly report of the Company for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on this date (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |                                             
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William R. Short                        
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | William R. Short                            
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer                     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Executive Officer)               
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Robert D. Koncerak                      
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Robert D. Koncerak                          
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Financial Officer                     
|                   |  |  |  |     |  | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
---

---

Exhibit 15.2

# Consent of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 333-09840, 333-12146, 333-14238,
333-109874 and 333-118930) of Retalix Ltd. of our report dated July 21, 2006, with respect
to the consolidated financial statements of Retalix Ltd., included in this Annual Report
(Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Kost Forer Gabbay & Kasierer
     A Member of Ernst & Young Global
     Tel Aviv, Israel
     July 2, 2008



---

---
<f he rl:' f) \\1 N f) ~ N f) ll \V c• f) I) 

Commonwealth oj Massachusetts ------------------------------·--------- ···-·-·- -

OFFICE ADDRESS 

125 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

Norwood Memorial Airport 

Russ Maguire, A.A. E., ACE, Airport Manager 

MAILING ADDRESS 

125 Access Road 

Norwood, MA 02062 

BY E-MAIL, HAND DELIVERY AND REGULAR MAIL 

March 21,2014 

Chris Donovan, President 

Boston Executive Helicopters (BEH) 

125 Access Road 

NonNood,MA 02062 

RE: Unauthorized Helicopter Operations 

Dear Chris: 

Please see enclosed the following: 

Tab A: 

TabB: 

TabC: 

Five video stills showing BEH helicopter, N6089J, having taxied up the gate 3 

taxi-lane, landing just off the gate 3 taxi-lane, in the gate 3 taxi-lane TOF A. This 

operation took place in close proximity to an electrical transfonner, picnic tables, 

the Boston Air Charter office and t-hangars. The helicopter is then groundhandled into BEH' s t-hangar. The video stills are date/time-stamped March 1, 

2014, from 6:04p.m. unti16:15 p .. m. 

A July 20, 2011 letter from NonNood Town Counsel, to BEH attorney, Joshua 

Fox, referencing helicopter take-offs/landings from the N onNood Airport's three 

gate lanes and the north/south taxi-lane. 

A June 13, 2011letter from BEH attorney, Joshua Fox, to my office. 

As noted in the video stills (Tab A), the operation of your company aircraft on March 1, 2014 

was in close proximity to an electrical transfonner, picnic tables, the Boston Air Charter office 

Phone: (781) 255-5616 I Fax: (781) 255-5617 I rmaguire@norwoodma.gov 
and t-hangars. Please be advised, again, that helicopter operations-to include takeoffs/landings-from any of the Norwood Airport's three gate lanes, or the north/south taxi-lane, 

are not authorized. 

As noted in Tabs B and C, this operational restriction-which is very much grounded in safety 

concerns-was addressed once before. My position has not changed or wavered. 

In recent years especially, the Norwood Airport Commission (NAC) has gone to great length to 

accommodate the helicopter operators at this facility . This is especially true for helicopter 

operators, like BEH, which are based on the airport's north quadrant. The board's efforts have 

included FAA filings to convert for helicopter operations a non-movement operating area which 

had been used largely by fixed-wing aircraft. This modification to standard allowed the NAC to 

then build-at federal, state and local expense-four helicopter parking circles, which are 

authorized for helicopter take-offs and landings. In turn, these parking circles are a short distance 

from BEH's hangar, thus requiring minimal effort on your company's part to ground-handle its 

aircraft back and forth. 

I expect your company's full compliance on this matter. Thank you. 

Sincerely, 

~/}vj . 

Russ Maguire, Man~ Norwood Memorial Airport 

CC. Norwood Airport Commission, Norwood Town Counsel, Rollins, Rollins & Fox
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Friday, October 02, 2015 10:03 AM

To: 'everettcollie@live.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Request for Additional Informat ion: E&J Photography (FAA-2015-3018)



### October 2, 2015

Dear Mr. Collie:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-3018). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), m odel(s), and type(s)(i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description(s) sh ould include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by October 16, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division
Ry an Letzeiser

Creisoft, inc. 809 W. Hill Street Suite D Charlotte, NC 28208 Specific Sections in which Creisoft, inc. is seeking an exemption: IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION OF: Creisoft, inc. FOR AN EXEMPTION SEEKING RELIEF FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI PHANTOM 3 + DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANNED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95) Extent of relief and our reason for seeking relief: In order to use our Unmanned Aircraft Systems for commercial use . We are seeking this exemption in order to legally conduct business and comply with all Federal regulations and standards put forth by the FAA while operating our Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
How our request would benefit the public as a whole: Granting the petition for Creisoft, Inc. wo uld allow for us to be able to efficiently, legally, economically, and safely perform aerial video, photography , and rem ote sensing for the purpose of land surveillance, land surveying, real estate, commercial inspections, insurance inspection and commercial maintenance over certain areas of these United States. Using Unmanned Aircraft Systems such as drone technology would greatly reduce negative impacts on the environment and also provide a safer alternative for business es to conduct land and real estate inspections for investment properties mitigating risk . Reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety, or how the exemption w ould provide a level of safety at least equal to the existing rule: By adhering to guidelines set forth by the FAA I wo uld not be going above the recommended altitude nor flying at night therefore avoiding any hazardous accidents such as colliding with a manned aircraft. Having spent 20 hours in a manned aircraft as a student pilot, with an effort to complete my private license in the next 6

- 12 mo nths, I understand the risk associated with operating an UAS for manned aircraft. We will be giving notification to the FAA 72 hours prior to any commercial use. Also we will be regularly test f lying and doing daily maintenance logs to ensure the UAS are in proper working order for each job or event as to prevent damage or bodily harm to the operators or innocent bystanders

. Summary to publish in the Federal Register stating ; 1. SEEKING RELIE F FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF TITLE 14 OF THE CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS SECTIONS 61.113(a) & (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.409(a)(1) & (a)(2), and 91.417(a) & (b) CONCERNING COMMERCIAL OPERATION OF DJI FLAMEWHEEL F450 + DJI INSPIRE 1 UNMANN ED AIRCRAFT SYSTEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 333 OF THE FAA MONDERNIZATION AND REFORM ACT OF 2012 (PUBLIC LAW 112

- 95) 2. We are seeking exemption in order to use our UAS for commercial use. Submitted on July 6th 2015 by: Ry an Letzeiser (248)

- 231

- 6117 rletze iser@obiecre.com Creisoft, inc. 809 W. Hill Street Suite D Charlotte, NC 28208
Three Months Ended June 30,
    
    
    Six Months Ended June 30,2009
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2009
    
    
    2008(In thousands, except per share data)
    
    Post-merger
    
    
    Pre-merger
    
    
    Post-merger
    
    
    Pre-mergerBasic and diluted Numerator:Income (loss) before discontinued operations attributable to the
Company  Common Shares
    
    $
    (3,673,404
    )
    
    $
    275,739
    *
    
    $
    (4,091,621
    )
    
    $
    436,068
    *Income (loss) before discontinued operations attributable to the
Company  Unvested Shares
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,556
    *
    
    
    
    
    
    
    2,618
    *Income (loss) before discontinued operations attributable to the
Company
    
    
    (3,673,404
    )
    
    
    277,295
    
    
    
    (4,091,621
    )
    
    
    438,686Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    5,032
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    643,294Net income (loss) attributable to the Company  basic and diluted
    
    $
    (3,673,404
    )
    
    $
    282,327
    
    
    $
    (4,091,621
    )
    
    $
    1,081,980Denominator:Weighted average common shares  basic
    
    
    81,224
    
    
    
    495,201
    *
    
    
    81,163
    
    
    
    494,975
    *Effect of dilutive securities:Stock options and restricted stock
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,686
    *
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,662Weighted average common shares  diluted
    
    
    81,224
    
    
    
    496,887
    *
    
    
    81,163
    
    
    
    496,637Net income (loss) per basic common share:Income (loss) before discontinued operations
    
    $
    (45.23
    )
    
    $
    .56
    *
    
    $
    (50.41
    )
    
    $
    .88
    *Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    .01
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.30Basic
    
    $
    (45.23
    )
    
    $
    .57
    
    
    $
    (50.41
    )
    
    $
    2.18Net income (loss) per diluted common share:Income (loss) before discontinued operations
    
    $
    (45.23
    )
    
    $
    .56
    *
    
    $
    (50.41
    )
    
    $
    .88
    *Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
    
    
    
    
    
    
    .01
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1.30Diluted
    
    $
    (45.23
    )
    
    $
    .57
    
    
    $
    (50.41
    )
    
    $
    2.18
 
 *
    
    Reflects implementation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Staff Position Emerging
Issues Task Force 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment
Transactions Are Participating Securities(ASC 260-10-45). See Note 1 in Item 1 of Part 1 of
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information.
---

|CERTIFICATION                                            
|---------------------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lake Victoria Mining
Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June
30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Ming Zhu., Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and           
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 14, 2014 | By: | /s/ Ming Zhu                              
|---------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                       |     | Ming Zhu                                  
|                       |     | Chief Financial Officer                   
|                       |     | (Principal Financial Officer and Principal
|                       |     | Accounting Officer)                       

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christian Mancillas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Rosca, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Rosca, Inc.


Date: 11/3/09                               By: /s/ Christian Mancillas
                                               ---------------------------------
                                            Name:  Christian Mancillas
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 6, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

128717 Michael F. Cavanagh & (51) Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 128717 COA: 252175 Bay CC: 02-010721, 02-010903 RANDALL OWEN COUTURIER, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals and th e application for leave to appeal as cross

appellant are considered and, pursuant to M CR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the Court of Appeals judgment and RE MAND this cas e to that court for (1) consideration of whether, under the standard set forth in People v Carines

, 460 Mich 750 (1999), for unpreserved cons titutional error, the circuit court erred in limiting cross-examination of a witness regarding a note that she allegedly wrote, and (2) for consideration of issues previously raised by defenda nt but not addressed by the Court of Appeals. In all other respects, the application for leav e to appeal and the application for leave to appeal as cross-appellant are DENIED.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

l0929 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 6, 2005

Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 201 (Thursday, October 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23989]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Indian Affairs

[245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]


Indian Gaming; Approval of Tribal-State Class III Gaming Compact 
Between the Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa and the State of 
Minnesota for Blackjack

AGENCY: Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice publishes the approval of the Addendum to Tribal-
State Compact for Control of Class III Blackjack on the Fond du Lac 
Band of Lake Superior Reservation in Minnesota for Class III Card 
Games.

DATES: The compact takes effect on October 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of 
Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs, 
Washington, DC 20240, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eba2858f828a85ac8a8682858cab89828ac58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="430a2d272a222d04222e2a2d2403212a226d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>; (202) 219-4066.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under section 11 of the Indian Gaming 
Regulatory Act (IGRA), Public Law 100-497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the 
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in the Federal Register notice 
of approved Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of engaging in Class 
III gaming activities on Indian lands. As required by 25 CFR 293.4, all 
compacts and amendments are subject to review and approval by the 
Secretary. The Amendment authorizes Class III card games in addition to 
blackjack, adds definitions, regulatory standards for Class III card 
games, background investigations, and provisions for enforcement and 
dispute resolution. The Amendment is approved.

Bryan Newland,
Assistant Secretary--Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2024-23989 Filed 10-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337-15-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with  the Annual  Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI,  Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending  April 30,  2006
(the  "Report"),  I,   Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and
Principal Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.



/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 3, 2007