alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012073EN.01002301.xml

| 13.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 73/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 73/23

---

Corrigendum to Practice directions to parties before the General Court

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 68 of 7 March 2012
  )

On page 25, third recital:

for:

‘Whereas the Instructions to the Registrar dated 5 July 2007 (OJ 2007 L 232, p. 1), as amended on 17 May 2010 (OJ 2010 L 170, p. 53) and on 24 January 2012 (OJ 2012 L 68, p. 23) (“the Instructions to the Registrar”), require the Registrar to ensure that procedural documents placed on a case-file comply with the provisions of the Statute, the Rules of Procedure and these Practice Directions (“the Practice Directions”) together with the Instructions to the Registrar; in particular, he is to require that any irregularities of form in documents lodged be made good and, in default of such regularisation, to refuse, where appropriate, to accept them if they do not comply with the provisions of the Statute or of the Rules of Procedure;’,

read:

‘Whereas the Instructions to the Registrar dated 5 July 2007 (OJ 2007 L 232, p. 1), as amended on 17 May 2010 (OJ 2010 L 170, p. 53) and on 24 January 2012 (OJ 2012 L 68, p. 20) (“the Instructions to the Registrar”), require the Registrar to ensure that procedural documents placed on a case-file comply with the provisions of the Statute, the Rules of Procedure and these Practice Directions (“the Practice Directions”) together with the Instructions to the Registrar; in particular, he is to require that any irregularities of form in documents lodged be made good and, in default of such regularisation, to refuse, where appropriate, to accept them if they do not comply with the provisions of the Statute or of the Rules of Procedure;’.

---
#### Spohn and others, a Partnership, Respondents, v. Norden, Appellant.*

*May 4*

June 2, *1959.*

*385For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by *Martin M. Morrissey*of Madison.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Spohn, Ross, Stevens, Lamb & Pick*of Madison, and oral argument by *James F. Spohn.*

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 costs, on October 6, 1959.

*386Currie, J.

Counsel for the defendant on this appeal states that the motion to strike the cognovit judgment was prepared by a Maryland attorney who was not familiar with Wisconsin practice, and concedes that the proper motion would be one to either open or vacate the judgment. The plaintiff consents that such motion may be so treated by this court on this appeal. Therefore, we will so treat it.

The plaintiff contends that, because of the recital in the order appealed from that the plaintiff had advised the court that the cognovit judgment was taken for security purposes only, such order did open up the judgment and permit the defendant to defend on the merits. However, the order does not make this clear. It should be modified by adding a clause thereto: (1) Specifically directing that the judgment is opened and that the defendant’s amended answer and counterclaim in the action for fees, which was instituted by the plaintiff against the defendant, stand as defendant’s pleading to the plaintiff’s complaint in the cognovit-judgment roll; and (2) that the cognovit judgment be continued in effect for security purposes only until the trial and determination of such action for fees.

Counsel for the defendant also advances the argument that the cognovit judgment should be vacated and not merely opened up. We do not agree. In *State ex rel. Bornemann v. Schultz*(1952), 260 Wis. 395, 402, 50 N. W. (2d) 922, we stated:

> “In most cases, where relief is sought by a party against whom a default judgment had been rendered, the interests of justice would seem to be best served by opening up the judgment and granting a trial upon the merits, thus retaining the lien of the judgment pending the outcome of such trial, rather than vacating the judgment outright; but nevertheless this is a matter in which the trial courts are free to exercise their own sound discretion.”

*387This same rule was reiterated and approved in *State ex rel. Chinchilla Ranch v. O’Connell*(1952), 261 Wis. 86, 97, 51 N. W. (2d) 714.

*By the Court.*— Order modified as provided in this opinion and, as so modified, is affirmed. No costs shall be taxed by either party on this appeal.

Martin, C. J., took no part.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2812

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide a waiver of the

oath of renunciation and allegiance for naturalization of aliens having

certain disabilities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mr. HATCH (for himself, Mr. DODD, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. DEWINE, Mr.

KOHL, Mr. FEINGOLD, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide

a waiver of the oath of renunciation and allegiance for

naturalization of aliens having certain disabilities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. WAIVER OF OATH OF RENUNCIATION AND AL4 LEGIANCE FOR NATURALIZATION OF ALIENS

5 HAVING CERTAIN DISABILITIES.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The last sentence of section

7 337(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C.

8 1448(a)) is amended to read as follows: ‘‘The Attorney

9 General may waive the taking of the oath if in the opinion
2

S 2812 IS

1 of the Attorney General the applicant for naturalization

2 is an individual with a disability, or a child, who is unable

3 to understand or communicate an understanding of the

4 meaning of the oath. If the Attorney General waives the

5 oath for such an individual, the individual shall be consid6 ered to have met the requirements of section 316(a)(3)

7 as to attachment to the Constitution and well disposition

8 to the United States.’’.

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 subsection (a) shall apply to individuals who applied for

11 naturalization before, on, or after the date of enactment

12 of this Act.

Æ
|WELLS FARGO(logo) | Commercial Mortgage ServicingD1050-084, 8th Floor401 South Tryon St.Charlotte, NC 282021-800-326-1334
|----------------- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2012, by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization
Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank, National Association as Trustee, Certificiate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-C4 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section
10.11 of this Agreement, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services and Timothy S. Ryan, Managing Director
of Customer Relationship Management, do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer
during the period from January 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per
the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review,
the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting
Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed
this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.



|/s/ Leslie
    Hayton |  | /s/ Timothy
    S. Ryan
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Leslie Hayton         |  | Timothy S. Ryan        
|Managing Director     |  | Managing Director      
|Wells Fargo Bank      |  | Wells Fargo Bank       





|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | Together we’ll go far
|---------------------- | ---------------------
-----"Davis, Brian C. - Manager, Electric Production-CTs" <DaviBC@jea.com> wrote: ----- 

To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

From: "Davis, Brian C. - Manager, Electric Production-CTs" <DaviBC@jea.com> 

Date: 07/15/2010 12:44PM 

cc: "Pineda, Joseph R. - Manager, Electric Production CT Maintenance" <PineJR@jea.com> 

Subject: FW: JEA Brandy Branch Generating Station ICR Extension Request 

 Jezebele, please find in the attached word document JEA 

Brandy Branch Generating Station’s request for an extension to the 

90 day deadline for the questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power 

Generating Effluent Guidelines. Your consideration regarding this 

extension request would be greatly appreciated.

 

Thank you,

 

Brian C. Davis

JEA Electric Production CT's 

Operations Manager

665-7434 office

509-2925 cell

----------------------------------------------------------------- 

Florida has a very broad Public Records Law. Virtually all 

written communications to or from State and Local Officials and 

employees are public records available to the public and media 

upon request. JEA does not differentiate between personal and 

business e-mails. E-mail sent on the JEA system will be 

Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3F3736DO... 8/24/2011
considered public and will only be withheld from disclosure if 

deemed confidential pursuant to State Law. Under Florida law, email addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public-records request, 

do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact JEA 

by phone or in writing. 

Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\TMedley\Local Settings\Temp\XPgrpwise\4C3F3736DO... 8/24/2011
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 302 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 302

              For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 25, 1999

Mr. Torricelli introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
              For the relief of Kerantha Poole-Christian.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 
              NATIONALITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, Kerantha Poole-Christian shall be classified as a 
child within the meaning of section 101(b)(1)(E) of such Act, upon 
approval of a petition filed on her behalf by Clifton or Linette 
Christian, citizens of the United States, pursuant to section 204 of 
such Act.
    (b) Limitation.--No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of 
Kerantha Poole-Christian shall, by virtue of such relationship, be 
accorded any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and 
Nationality Act.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 26, 2009 

d1019 

Order 

 

October 26, 2009 

139241 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139241 

 COA: 291756 

Alcona CC: 08-001115-FH 

KEVIN THOMAS BAUGHAN, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 3, 2009 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24024]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 436 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-23, K2025-22.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24024 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emilia Ochoa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Castillo, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Castillo, Inc.


Date: August 7, 2008                  By: /s/ Emilia Ochoa
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Emilia Ochoa
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Lincoln Parke, the President,  Treasurer , Secretary and Director of GreenChek Technology Inc. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarter ended November 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.








Date: June 11, 2010





By:
/s/ Lincoln ParkeName: Lincoln ParkeTitle: President and Treasurer(Principal Executive, Financial &

Accounting Officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
mtvx_ex1082.htm


Exhibit 10.82


 







  





1











  






 


 





 




  





2











  






 


 







  





3











  






 





 


 




  





4











  






 


 







  





5











  






 


 







  





6











  






 


 







  





7











  






 







  





8











  






 


 







  





9











  






 







  





10











  






 







  





11











  






 







  





12











  






 







  





13











  






 







  





14











  






 


 







  





15











  






 


 







  





16











  






 







  





17
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Homeowners Choice, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2009 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ FRANCIS X. MCCAHILL IIIFrancis X. McCahill IIIPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2009


A signed original of this document has been provided to Homeowners Choice, Inc. and will be retained by
Homeowners Choice, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



34
#### Firemen’s Insurance Company of Newark and others, Appellants, vs. Badger Paint & Hardware Stores, Inc., Respondent.

*October 9*

November *3, 1953.*

For the appellants there were briefs by *H. 0. Wolfe*and *Wolfe, O’Leary & Kenney,*all of Milwaukee, attorneys, and *Vilas H. Whaley*of Racine of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. H. O. Wolfe*and *Mr. Whaley.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Whyte, Hirsch-boeck & Minahan,*attorneys, and *Victor M. Harding*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Harding.*

Fairchild, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *Commerce Ins. Co. v. Badger P. & H. Stores,*ante, p. 174, 60 N. W. (2d) 742, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2865

To designate certain land of the National Forest System located in the

State of Virginia as wilderness.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 13, 2000

Mr. ROBB (for himself and Mr. WARNER) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural

Resources

A BILL

To designate certain land of the National Forest System

located in the State of Virginia as wilderness.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Virginia Wilderness

5 Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS.

7 Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to designate

8 certain National Forest System lands in the States of Vir9 ginia and West Virginia as wilderness areas’’ (Public Law

10 100–326; 102 Stat. 584) is amended—
2

•S 2865 IS

1 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

2 end;

3 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and

4 inserting a semicolon; and

5 (3) by adding at the end the following:

6 ‘‘(7) certain land in the George Washington

7 National Forest, comprising approximately 6,500

8 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘The

9 Priest Wilderness Study Area’, dated June 6, 2000,

10 to be known as the ‘Priest Wilderness Area’; and

11 ‘‘(8) certain land in the George Washington

12 National Forest, comprising approximately 4,800

13 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘The

14 Three Ridges Wilderness Study Area’, dated June 6,

15 2000, to be known as the ‘Three Ridges Wilderness

16 Area.’’.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


   /s/ T J Jesky
----------------------------------
       T J Jesky
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer



Date  May 21, 2010
      --------------

<PAGE>
#### Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America, Division 998, and others, Appellants, vs. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company and another, Respondents.

*May 6*

July *12, 1949.*

*164For the appellants there were briefs by *Padway, Goldberg & Previant,*and oral argument by *David E. Previant, Saul Cooper,*and *William F. Quick,*all of Milwaukee.

For the respondent Wisconsin Employment Relations Board there were briefs by the *Attorney General, Stewart G. Honeck,*deputy attorney general, and *Beatrice Lampert,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mrs. Lampert.*

For the respondent Milwaukee Electric Railway & Transport Company there was a brief by *Shaw, Muskat & Paulsen*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Martin R. Paulsen.*

*165Broadfoot, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *United G., C. & C. Workers v. Wisconsin E. R. Board,*ante, p. 154, 38 N. W. (2d) 692, before the trial court and before this court.

Following the argument and submission of this case below, the trial court filed a decision overruling the demurrers to the separate answers of the defendants, but directed that judgments might be entered declaring the rights and status of the parties. When the demurrers were overruled, the burden' of proceeding with the case was upon the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs elected to produce no evidence and upon that election the trial court should have entered an order dismissing the complaint. For that reason the judgment entered must be reversed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to enter an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ complaint.