alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 368 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-775, K2024-68.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-23993 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 11, 2009
    /s/  John M. CurtisJohn M. CurtisPresident and Chief Executive Officer A signed original of this written statement has been provided to Vangent and will be retained
by Vangent and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.
##### 



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (a)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended: and(b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Harrington West Financial Group, Inc./s/ Craig J. Cerny

Craig J. CernyChief Executive Officer/s/ William W. Phillips, jr.

William W. Phillips, Jr.President, Chief Operating Officerand Chief Financial Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
 137
[Cite as State ex rel. Mayes v. Ambrose , 2012-Ohio-3824.] 

# Court of Appeals of Ohio

EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA

JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 98758



## STATE OF OHIO, EX REL. PETER WILLIAM MAYES

RELATOR

vs. 

## JUDGE DICK AMBROSE, ET AL.

RESPONDENTS



### JUDGMENT: COMPLAINT DISMISSED

Writ of Mandamus and/or Procedendo Order No. 457551

RELEASE DATE: August 20, 2012FOR RELATOR Peter William Mayes, pro se Inmate No. 442-575 Hocking Correctional Facility P.O. Box 59 Nelsonville, Ohio 45764

ATTORNEY FOR RESPONDENT

William D. Mason Cuyahoga County Prosecutor The Justice Center 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., J.: {¶1} Relator, Peter William Mayes, is the defendant in Cuyahoga C.P. No. CR-442426, which has been assigned to respondent judge who is a member of respondent court. Mayes complains that respondent imposed sentence without properly addressing the issue of allied offenses of similar import under R.C. 2941.25. Mayes argues that his sentence is void and requests this court to issue a writ of mandamus and/or procedendo to compel respondents “to issue a valid judgment in Case No. 02-CR-442426-ZA, and to vacate the sentence without unnecessary delay.” Complaint, Ad Damnum Clause. {¶2} For the reasons stated below, we dismiss this action sua sponte. {¶3} In State ex rel. Gonzalez v. Astrab , 8th Dist. No. 97922, 2012-Ohio-3582, the relator “Gonzalez argue[d] that his sentence [was] void and request[ed] this court to issue a writ of mandamus and/or procedendo to compel respondents to have him returned to Cuyahoga County ‘to be sentenced to a lawful sentence * * *.’ Complaint, ¶ 11.” Id. at ¶ 1. This court granted the motion to dismiss of the respondent judge and the court of common pleas. {¶4} In Gonzalez, we reaffirmed that “allied-offense claims are nonjurisdictional and are not cognizable in an extraordinary-writ action.” (Citation omitted.) State ex rel. Agosto v. Gallagher, 8th Dist. No. 97760, 2011-Ohio-4514, ¶ 3, aff’d , 131 Ohio St.3d 176, 2012-Ohio-563, 962 N.E.2d 796. In light of Agosto , we concluded: “The SupremeCourt has stated clearly that original actions do not provide a remedy for allied-offense claims. As a consequence, we must hold that Gonzalez’s complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.” Gonzalez , supra , ¶ 4. {¶5} Likewise, in this action, Mayes requests relief in mandamus and/or procedendo with respect to his claim that respondent judge erroneously sentenced him on allied offenses of similar import. In light of this court’s holdings in Agosto and Gonzalez as well as the Supreme Court’s affirming Agosto , we must also hold in this action that Mayes’s complaint does not state a claim upon which relief can be granted. {¶6} Accordingly, we dismiss Mayes’s complaint sua sponte. Relator to pay costs. This court directs the clerk of court to serve all parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal as required by Civ.R. 58(B). {¶7} Complaint dismissed.

FRANK D. CELEBREZZE, JR., JUDGE MARY J. BOYLE, P.J., and KENNETH A. ROCCO, J., CONCUR
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83781-83782]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24100]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 16

[Docket No. FDA-2024-N-3654]
RIN 0910-AI97


Regulatory Hearing Before the Food and Drug Administration; 
General Provisions; Amendments; Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Direct final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, Agency, or we) is 
correcting a final rule entitled ``Regulatory Hearing Before the Food 
and Drug Administration; General Provisions; Amendments'' that appeared

[[Page 83782]]

in the Federal Register of September 20, 2024. The final rule 
inadvertently omitted the effective date for a provision in the 
regulatory text. This document corrects the error in the DATES portion.

DATES: Effective February 3, 2025.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joyce Strong, Office of Policy, 
Legislation, and International Affairs, Food and Drug Administration, 
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, 301-796-9148.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2024-21231, published in the 
Federal Register of Friday, September 20, 2024 (89 FR 77019), on page 
77019, in the third column, the DATES section is corrected to read as 
follows:

DATES: Effective date: This rule is effective February 3, 2025, except 
for amendatory instruction number 3, amending 21 CFR 16.1(b)(2), which 
is effective December 18, 2025. Either electronic or written comments 
on the direct final rule or its companion proposed rule must be 
submitted by December 4, 2024. If FDA receives no significant adverse 
comments within the specified comment period, the Agency intends to 
publish a document confirming the effective date of the final rule in 
the Federal Register within 30 days after the comment period on this 
direct final rule ends. If timely significant adverse comments are 
received, the Agency will publish a document in the Federal Register 
withdrawing this direct final rule within 30 days after the comment 
period on this direct final rule ends.

    Dated: October 10, 2024.
Eric Flamm,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-24100 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
STATE OF TENNESSEE 

DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSERVATION 

WATER SUPPLY

9th Floor, 401 Church Street 

Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1549 

 WELL REWORK REPORT 

Name and Address of Facility Name and Address of Owner/Operator 

State County Permit Number

WELL ACTIVITY TYPE OF PERMIT LOCATION 

___ Brine Disposal ___ Individual Latitude

___ Enhanced Recovery ___ Area 

___ Hydrocarbon Storage ___ Number of Wells 

 Longitude 

Lease Name Well umber 

Total Depth Before Rework Date Rework Commenced 

Total Depth After Rework Date Rework Completed 

Certification 

I certify under the penalty of law that I have examined and am familiar with the information submitted in this document and all

attachments and that, based on my inquiry of those individuals immediately responsible for obtaining the information, I believe that

the information is true, accurate, and complete. I am aware that there are significant penalties for submitting false information,

including the possibility of fine or imprisonment. 

Name and Official Title (please type or print) Signature Date Signed 

CN RDA 2474
EXHIBIT 11.0

                        Computation of Earnings Per Share



<PAGE>
                            WEST ESSEX BANCORP, INC.
                       STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF
                     EARNINGS PER SHARE FOR THE YEARS ENDED
                     December 31, 1999 and December 31, 1998
                (Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)


                                                        For the Calendar Year
                                                      --------------------------
                                                         1999          1998 (1)
                                                      ----------      ----------
Basic:
     Net income ................................      $3,043,349      $1,397,300
     Net income applicable to common stock .....      $3,043,349      $1,397,300
     Average common shares
         outstanding - basic  ..................       4,004,069       4,062,395
     Basic earnings per share ..................      $     0.76      $     0.34
Diluted:
     Net income ................................      $3,043,349      $1,397,300
                                                      ----------      ----------
     Average common shares outstanding - basic .       4,004,069       4,062,395
     Effect of dilutive securities .............           3,682              --
                                                      ----------      ----------
     Average common shares outstanding - diluted       4,007,731       4,062,395
                                                      ==========      ==========
Diluted earnings per share .....................      $     0.76      $     0.34
                                                      ==========      ==========


---------------------
(1)       The  registrant's  initial public stock offering took place on October
          2, 1998. Earnings per share is calculated based on net income for 1998
          and the weighted average shares  outstanding  since October 2, 1998 as
          if such shares had been outstanding the entire fiscal year.
# ROCKY PASS SEAFOODS, LLC A DIVISON OF

May29,2014
Michael Gorman Alaska Department of Transportation Mr. Gorman, I am writing this letter of support for Alaska Seaplanes and their flight service into Kake. Alaska. I operate the Salmon Processing Plant in Kake, which is one of the largest employers in Town during the summer months. It is vital that I have reliable Flight service for the movement of parts and people to keep our operation running smoothly. On many occasions, Alaska Seaplanes has done the extra work as a partner and Neighbor to ensure that I have the service I need. I hope that during your consideration you can take into account that Alaska Seaplanes is already an established player and is well respected in the community of Kake. I personally hope that you can keep the Essential Air Contract with this reputable and deserving Flight Service Company
. Respectfully, () _I 

# », J A 

# d ;i;J o-1VT 10 h. 

# ~r;n Dennis H
. Gray, Jr
. General Manager Rocky PassSeafoods
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 10, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-50603

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALBERTO TOMAS YOUNGBLOOD,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:02-CR-86-ALL 

--------------------

Before GARWOOD, GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Alberto Youngblood appeals from the district court’s order

denying his motion to dismiss the Government’s request for

discovery and directing Youngblood to answer the Government’s

discovery.

This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its

own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby, 813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th

Cir. 1997). Orders directing or denying discovery are not final

decisions within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and are not
No. 04-50603

-2-

appealable except under limited circumstances not presented in

this case. See Branch v. Phillips Petroleum Co., 638 F.2d 873,

877-78 (5th Cir. 1981).

APPEAL DISMISSED.
ex-10.32

 LOAN AGREEMENT
 June 30, 2014
 

 Poly Shield Technologies Inc.  (the “Lender”) of 888 S Andrews Ave, Suite 201, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316, advanced US$50,000 (the “Principal Sum”) to New World Technologies Group Inc. (the “Borrower”) of 888 S Andrews Ave, Suite 201, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33316,.  The Lender advanced the funds on June 30, 2014.
 The Borrower agrees to repay the Principal Sum on demand, together with interest calculated and compounded monthly at the rate of 6% per year (the “Interest”) from June 30, 2014.  The Borrower is liable for repayment for the Principal Sum and accrued Interest and any costs that the Lender incurs in trying to collect the Principal Sum and the Interest.
 The Borrower will evidence the debt and its repayment of the Principal Sum and the Interest with a promissory note in the attached form.
 LENDER
 BORROWER
 Poly Shield Technologies Inc.  
 New World Technologies Group Inc.
 Per:
 Per:
 

 

 /s/ Rasmus Norling
 /s/ Kevin Sieveres_________________
 Authorized Signatory
 Authorized Signatory 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 
 PROMISSORY NOTE
 

 	 	
	 Principal Amount:  US$50,000 
	 June 30, 2014


 

 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED New World Technologies Group Inc., (the “Borrower”) promises to pay on demand to the order of Poly Shield Technologies Inc. (the “Lender”) the sum of $50,000 lawful money of United States of America (the “Principal Sum”) together with interest on the Principal Sum from June 30, 2014 (“Effective Date”) both before and after maturity, default and judgment at the Interest Rate as defined below.
 

 For the purposes of this promissory note, Interest Rate means 6 per cent per year.  Interest at the Interest Rate must be calculated and compounded monthly not in advance from and including the Effective Date (for an effective rate of 6.168% per annum calculated monthly), and is payable together with the Principal Sum when the Principal Sum is repaid.
 

 The Borrower may repay the Principal Sum and the Interest in whole or in part at any time.
 

 The Borrower waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of dishonour of this promissory note.
 

 

 

 

 BORROWER
 New World Technologies Group Inc.
 

 Per:
 

 /s/ Kevin Sieveres_________________
 

 Authorized signatory
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24030]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
373 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-20, K2025-19.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24030 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

129163 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

THOMAS L. ZUDER, Deceased, by KRISTAL Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, LITTLE, Justices Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 129163 

 COA: 259733 
 WCAC: 03-000233 

TAILORED BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC., 

PIONEER, INC., and ACCIDENT FUND

INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, 

Defendants-Appellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of 

granting leave to appeal, we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for 

consideration as on leave granted. 

t0125 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 31, 2006 

Clerk
Exhibit 10.8

Mr. Keith
Reidy                                         
       19 May 2002
Metron Technology
770 Lucerne Drive
Sunnyvale, CA 94086

Dear
Keith,

As
we have been discussing, please find listed below our agreement for the termination of our distribution agreement with Metron Technology for SouthEast Asia and PRC. If you agree to the below listed
terms, please counter sign your acceptance.

Specifically:



Keith,
if you agree to the above items, please indicate your acceptance by signing and returning this letter to me via fax at 952-820-0060.

We
look forward to resolving this issue so that we can focus on the Korean market with your team to the mutual benefit of both parties.

Best
respects,

Mayson
Brooks
VP, Worldwide Sales & Field Operations
August Technology

Agreed
to:

|                         
|-------------------------
|Keith Reidy
VP, Marketing

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Mike Lizarraga, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Madero, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of August, 2007.


/s/ Mike Lizarraga
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
CONSENT OF REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
                              PUBLIC ACCOUTING FIRM

As  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm,  we hereby consent to the
incorporation  by  reference in  Registration  Statement  File No.  333-80441 of
Farnsworth  Bancorp,  Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  on Form S-8 of our  report  dated
December  1, 2004  incorporated  by  reference  in the 10-KSB for the year ended
September 30, 2004.




Kronick Kalada Berdy & Co.
Kingston, Pennsylvania
December 27, 2004                                 /s/ Kronich Kalada Berdy & Co.