alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**

I, **Timothy Barritt**, certify that:

1.      I have reviewed this **10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008**, of Sterling Oil & Gas Company;

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a.     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b.     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c.     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.     The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a.     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b.     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K/A of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-5 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   June 27, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83929]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24077]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 470 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-73, K2025-71.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24077 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
In The Matter Of: 

JETBLUE AIRWAYS 

CORPORATION 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

HEARING DOCKET 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0813 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Case No. 2012EA150022 

Respondent 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Respondent, JetBlue Airways Corporation, hereby notifies the United State Department of 

Transportation, Office of Hearings, and the Complainant, pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 13.204(b), that 

it shall be represented in the above-stated action by the attorney listed below. All 

communications, notices, pleadings, or documents are respectfully requested to be forwarded as 

follows: 

Steven Raffaele 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

31 West 52nd Street 

New York, New York 10019 

Tel.: (212) 513-3200 

Fax: (212)385-9010 

Email: Steven.Raffaele@hklaw.com 

Respectfully submitted, 

By: SL~~~Li .. Steven Raffaere .J 

Dated: January 30, 2015 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that on this day copies of the foregoing Notice of Appearance were placed in the 

United States mail, postage prepaid, Certified Mail - Return Receipt Requested addressed as 

follows: 

Christian Lewerenz, Esq. 

Federal Aviation Administration 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

Tel: 718 553-3273 

Fax: 718 995-5699 

Email: christian.lewerenz@faa.gov 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

IF FILING BY FEDERAL EXPRESS: 

Federal Aviation Administration (Original and one copy) 

600 Independence Avenue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building- Suite 2Wl 000 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

Attn: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Ma ·e B. Catillaz 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LL 

31 West 52nct Street 

New York, New York 10019 

2
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belvedere Resources Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shawn Englmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated this 12th day of May, 2009.   Shawn Englmann  Shawn Englmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Blush Brands, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barrett Carrere, Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 23, 2010





By:
                  /s/ Barrett CarrereBarrett
      CarrereChief
      Financial Officer and
                    Secretary(Principal
      Executive and
                    Financial
      Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
First Blush Brands, Inc. and will be retained by First Blush Brands, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# L_2012227EN.01001502.xml

| 23.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 227/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 227/15

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2012/478/CFSP of 16 August 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 219 of 17 August 2012
  )

On page 22, the table in the Annex, row ‘1.’, column ‘Date of listing’:

for:

‘
  16.8.2012
  ’,

read:

‘
  17.8.2012
  ’.

---
#### Schwellenbach, Plaintiff, vs. Wagner and others, Respondents: O’Brien and another, Appellants.

*January 5*

February *3, 1953.*

*98For the appellants there were briefs by *Doar & Knowles*of New Richmond, and oral argument by *John Doar.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Toebaas, Hart, Kraege & Jackman*of Madison, and *Gwin & Petersen*of Hudson, and oral argument by *W. L. Jackman.*

Broadfoot, J.

The question of Wagner’s negligence in failing to display the red flag was properly submitted, and that matter has been determined by a jury. Whether or not the negligence of Wagner in parking as he did was a proximate cause of the collision has not been answered. There must be a new trial on this question.

At the new trial the court will answer in the affirmative a question directed to Wagner’s negligence in parking. He will then have a jury answer a question as to whether or not that negligence was a proximate cause of the collision.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
# C_2012093EN.01001901.xml

| 30.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/19

---

Commission Declaration

2012/C 93/07

Declaration by the Commission concerning the position of the Council on the adoption of a proposal for a decision of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Decision No 573/2007/EC establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as part of the general programme ‘Solidarity and management of migration flows’ and repealing Council Decision 2004/904/EC (‘establishment of a joint EU resettlement programme’)

The Commission, in a spirit of compromise and in order to ensure the immediate adoption of the proposal, supports the final text; however it notes that this is without prejudice to its right of initiative with regard to the choice of legal bases, in particular in reference to the future use of Article 80 of the TFEU.

---
Exhibit
        32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
        TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 In
        connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFH Holding
        II, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, I, Amir F.
        Heshmatpour, President of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1.
        Such
        Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, fully
        complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
        Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
        ended March 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
        condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Dated:
                  May 15, 2008
              /s/
                  Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir
                  F. Heshmatpour, President (Principal Executive Officer and Principal
                  Financial and Accounting Officer)
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3163

To designate the calendar decade beginning on January 1, 2001, as the

‘‘Decade of Pain Control and Research’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 5 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. HATCH introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To designate the calendar decade beginning on January 1,

2001, as the ‘‘Decade of Pain Control and Research’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DECADE OF PAIN CONTROL AND RESEARCH.

4 The calendar decade beginning January 1, 2001, is

5 designated as the ‘‘Decade of Pain Control and Research’’.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3106 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3106

    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
    definition of homebound under the medicare home health benefit.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 25 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

  Mr. Jeffords (for himself, Mr. Reed, and Mr. Leahy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to clarify the 
    definition of homebound under the medicare home health benefit.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``The Home Health Care Protection Act 
of 2000''.

SEC. 2. CLARIFICATION OF THE HOMEBOUND DEFINITION UNDER THE MEDICARE 
              HOME HEALTH BENEFIT.

    (a) In General.--Sections 1814(a) and 1835(a) of the Social 
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395f(a) and 1395n(a)) are each amended--
            (1) in the last sentence, by striking ``, and that absences 
        of the individual from home are infrequent or of relatively 
        short duration, or are attributable to the need to receive 
        medical treatment''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new sentences: ``Any 
        absence of an individual from the home attributable to the need 
        to receive health care treatment, including regular absences 
        for the purpose of participating in therapeutic, psychosocial, 
        or medical treatment in an adult day-care program that is 
        licensed or certified by a State, or accredited, to furnish 
        adult day-care services in the State shall not disqualify an 
        individual from being considered to be `confined to his home'. 
        Any other absence of an individual from the home shall not so 
        disqualify an individual if the absence is of infrequent or 
        short duration. For purposes of the preceding sentence, any 
        absence for the purpose of visiting a family member who is 
        unable to visit the individual or for the purpose of attending 
        a religious service shall be deemed to be an absence of 
        infrequent and short duration.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to items and services provided on or after the date of enactment 
of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bow Valley Ventures, Inc.. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Hiron, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Richard HironRichard HironChief Executive Officer & Principal Accounting OfficerJanuary 19, 2011 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### State of Iowa v. Richard Haupt, Appellant.

Seduction: evidence: reputation of prosecutrix. On a prosecution for seduction, evidence of the general moral character of the prose-cutrix, when she is a witness for the State, is admissible for the purpose of testing her credibility, but should ordinarily be confined to the time of trial.

*Appeal from Greene District*Court.— HoN. F. M. Powers, Judge.

Friday, December 16, 1904.

A jury found the defendant guilty of seduction, and he appeals from a judgment on the *verdict.-*—

Reversed.

*Gallagher & Graham,*for appellant.

*Chas. W. Mullan,*Attorney-General, and *Lawrence De Graff,*Assistant Attorney-General, for the State.

*153SherwiN, J.—

A careful consideration of the evidence sustaining the charge against the defendant leaves no doubt in our minds as to its sufficiency to sustain the verdict. The instructions given fully and fairly covered the issues tried, and are free from -error. The one referring to the flight of the defendant was justified by the evidence that he then knew of the complainant’s condition and of her claim that he was the author thereof.

The defendant introduced evidence tending to prove that the prosecutrix was of unchaste character prior to his alleged seduction of her. He also offered testimony as to her general moral character at the time of trial and before that time, which was rejected. The prosecutrix was a witness for the State, and the offer of this testimony was made under section 4614 of the Code, for the purpose of testing her credibility as a witness. We think it should have been received. The statute says, •“ The general moral character of a witness may be proved for the purpose of testing his credibility.” No exception is made to -the admissibility of such testimony by the statute, and we cannot ingraft one thereon for application in this class of cases. The statute has frequently been applied to a defendant in criminal prosecutions who testifies in his own behalf, and we can find no substantial reason for holding it not applicable here. *State v. Kirkpatrick,*63 Iowa, 554; *State v. Hardin,*46 Iowa, 623. The charge of seduction puts in issue only the previous character of the prosecutrix, and this may not be assailed by testimony as to reputation or as to. general moral character. When she becomes a witness, however, her credibility is to be tested and determined by'the rules applicable to other witnesses. For this purpose, only, the general moral character or reputation may be shown as discrediting the witness, and not proof of a specific vice. *Kilburn v. Mullen,*22 Iowa, 498; *Kitteringham v. Dance,*58 Iowa, 632. Such testimony will ordinarily be confined to the time of the trial, and in cases of this character the rule should be as closely *154adhered to as possible. If this be done, the accused will secure no advantage by a slanderous and unjust assault upon the character of the woman he has wronged; on the other hand, if she be not worthy of belief because of her general bad character, his rights are protected. For the error indicated, the judgment is reversed, and the case remanded.— *Reversed*