alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON

STATE OF WASHINGTON, ) ) Respondent, )

) v. ) ) ANTAVIUS MAKELL SIMS, ) ) Appellant. ) FILED: APR 1 6 2018

) No.77237-6-1

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

PER CURIAM — Antavius Simsappeals his conviction for third degree assault His counsel argues,and the State concedes,that he is entitled to withdraw his guilty plea because he was misadvised regarding the standard sentence range for his offense. Sims raises a similar argument in his Statement ofAdditional Grounds For Review. We acceptthe State's concession and remand for the courtto allow Sims to withdraw his plea. Remanded. FOR THE COURT:



# lad,/
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Craig Lindsay, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Yellow Hill Energy
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
3rd day of March, 2008.


/s/ Craig Lindsay
----------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# L_2012229EN.01002501.xml

| 24.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 229/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 229/25

---

POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE DECISION EUAVSEC-SOUTH SUDAN/1/2012

of 10 August 2012

on the appointment of the Head of Mission of the European Union Aviation Security CSDP Mission in South Sudan (EUAVSEC-South Sudan)

(2012/487/CFSP)

THE POLITICAL AND SECURITY COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular the third paragraph of Article 38 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2012/312/CFSP of 18 June 2012 on the European Union Aviation Security CSDP Mission in South Sudan (1), and in particular Article 9(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | By Article 9(1) of Decision 2012/312/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the EUAVSEC-South Sudan, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By Article 9(1) of Decision 2012/312/CFSP, the Council authorised the Political and Security Committee, in accordance with Article 38 of the Treaty, to take the relevant decisions for the purpose of political control and strategic direction of the EUAVSEC-South Sudan, including the decision to appoint a Head of Mission.

| (2) | The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of Mr Lasse ROSENKRANDS CHRISTENSEN as Head of Mission of EUAVSEC-South Sudan until 18 January 2014, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy has proposed the appointment of Mr Lasse ROSENKRANDS CHRISTENSEN as Head of Mission of EUAVSEC-South Sudan until 18 January 2014,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Lasse ROSENKRANDS CHRISTENSEN is hereby appointed Head of European Union Aviation Security CSDP Mission in South Sudan (EUAVSEC-South Sudan) until 18 January 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 10 August 2012.

For the Political and Security Committee

The Chairperson

O. SKOOG

---

(1)  
  OJ L 158, 19.6.2012, p. 17.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83921]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24050]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 8, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 449 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-42, K2025-41.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24050 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 31
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Hicks Acquisition Company I, Inc.2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report.3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this Quarterly Report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report.4.
    
    I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating
to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andc.
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 5.
    
    I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 /s/ JOSEPH B. ARMESJoseph B. ArmesPresident, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer(principal executive officer and principal financial officer)November 14, 2008
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with  the Annual  Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI,  Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending  April 30,  2005
(the  "Report"),  I,   Michael R. Quinn, Principal Executive Officer  and
Principal Financial  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.




/s/ Michael R. Quinn

-----------------------
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 3, 2007
EXHIBIT #22

                            WKI HOLDING COMPANY, INC.
                      (FORMALLY CCPC HOLDING COMPANY, INC.)


SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2001 ARE LISTED BELOW:

1.     WKI Holding Company, Inc. (Delaware)

2.     World Kitchen, Inc. (Delaware)

3.     World Kitchen Canada, Inc. (Canada)

4.     World Kitchen (Asia Pacific) Pte. Ltd. (Singapore)

5.     World Kitchen Australia Pte. Ltd. (Australia)

6.     World Kitchen (Asia Pacific) Sdn Bdh (Malaysia)

7.     Mundial Brasil Produtos de Consuma Ltda. (Brazil)

8.     World Kitchen (Korea) Co., Ltd. (Republic of Korea)

9.     CCPC FSC, Inc.

10.    World Kitchen ATG (M) SDN BHD (Malaysia)

11.    EKCO Group, Inc. (Delaware)

12.    EKCO Housewares, Inc. (Delaware)

13.    World Kitchen Mexico, S. de R. L. de CV fka VIA American (Mexico)

14.    EKCO Cleaning, Inc. (Massachusetts)

15.    WKI Latin America Holding, LLC (Delaware)

16.    EKCO Distribution of Illinois, Inc. (Delaware)

17.    EKCO Manufacturing of Ohio, Inc. (Delaware)

18.    World Kitchen Canada (EHI), Inc.

19.    World Kitchen (UK) Limited

20.    WKM, S. dw. L. de. C. V. (Mexico)

21.    World Kitchen (GHC), Inc. (Delaware)

22.    CSC of Tennessee, Inc.

23.    WB of Ohio, Inc. (Ohio)


<PAGE>
24.    Chicago Cutlery, Inc. (Florida)

25.    World Kitchen Canada (GHC), Inc.


<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 21.8Subsidiaries of Veridien CorporationA) Rost Inc. – incorporated in Florida (dormant)B) Rost Medical Development, Inc. – incorporated in Delaware (dormant)C) Marquit Manufacturing Specialties, Inc. – incorporated in Delaware (dormant)D) Veridien.com Inc. – incorporated in Delaware (dormant)E) Norpak (U.S.), Inc. – incorporated in DelawareF) The SunSwipe Corporation, L.L.C. – incorporated in DelawareG) Communications Gear, Inc. – incorporated in Delaware (dormant)H) Viraguard (Canada), Inc. – incorporated in Canada [Federal corporation]The above-named subsidiaries which are operational conduct business solely under the listed names.
EXHIBIT 32





Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Northwest, Inc.


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the undersigned hereby certifies in his/her capacity as an officer of First Financial Northwest, Inc. (the “Company”) and in connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements included in the Report.


.








/s/ Victor Karpiak


Victor Karpiak


Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)





Dated: May 9, 2011








/s/ Kari Stenslie


Kari Stenslie


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)





Dated: May 9, 2011


















53
### Regulatory Evaluation


### Docket No. FAA- 2015-4023 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-2-AD

Add the 1vork hours. parts cost, andnumber ofU.S. registeredproducts to the table belmv
.**~Vhen** J'Oll are finished. click on the
.. Update Fields " button to automaticallyfill in the totals. 

### Update Fields 

# j
Estimated Costs: Action Costs perProduct (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ 

## u.s. for U
.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered and close-up) our) Products Strip, Inspect & Recoat 

### 7.15 7835 10 CDP Seal Teeth



### The known number ofproducts in compliance: 

### Number Total Costs ofcompliance for U.S. fleet: $84,428 

### Costs covered under warranty 

### (if known) $\Varranty On-Condition Costs:

# ~ Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) testing, and close- replacement) up) Inspection



### 7

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table thatwas assumedor mightnot be obvious
. Thisfield can also be usedto explain warranty costs): 

### Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • YES* 

### 0 NO IZI *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### Is the AD significant? • YES* 0 NO IZI *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. • YES 

### D**NO~** 

### Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? •YES* 0 NO IZI *Explanation:



### 8
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6883

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

RODNEY MORRIS JONES,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior

District Judge. (1:05-cr-00506-JCC-1)

Submitted: November 20, 2014 Decided: November 24, 2014

Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Morris Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Michael 

Fitzpatrick, Jeffrey L. Shih, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES 

ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Morris Jones seeks to appeal the district 

court’s orders treating his motion seeking relief under the All 

Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012), as a successive and 

unauthorized 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion, and dismissing it 

on that basis, and denying Jones’ Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion 

to alter or amend the judgment. The district court’s orders are 

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a 

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2012); 

Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 369 (4th Cir. 2004). A 

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 
3

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Jones has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# L_2012218EN.01001901.xml

| 15.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 218/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 218/19

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 2 August 2012

repealing Decision ECB/2011/25 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral

(ECB/2012/17)

(2012/475/EU)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first indent of Article 127(2) thereof,

Having regard to the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank, and in particular the first indent of Article 3.1, Article 12.1, Article 18 and the second indent of Article 34.1,

Whereas:

| (1) | Decision ECB/2011/25 of 14 December 2011 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral (1) should be replaced by Guideline ECB/2012/18 of 2 August 2012 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral and amending Guideline ECB/2007/9 (2) to allow the national central banks to implement the additional enhanced credit support measures in the contractual and regulatory framework applicable to their counterparties. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Decision ECB/2011/25 of 14 December 2011 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral (1) should be replaced by Guideline ECB/2012/18 of 2 August 2012 on additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral and amending Guideline ECB/2007/9 (2) to allow the national central banks to implement the additional enhanced credit support measures in the contractual and regulatory framework applicable to their counterparties.

| (2) | Decision ECB/2011/25 should be repealed, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Decision ECB/2011/25 should be repealed,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Repeal of Decision ECB/2011/25

1.   Decision ECB/2011/25 is repealed with effect from 14 September 2012.

2.   References to the repealed Decision shall be construed as references to Guideline ECB/2012/18.

Article 2

Entry into force

This Decision shall enter into force two days following its adoption.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 2 August 2012.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---

(1)  
  OJ L 341, 22.12.2011, p. 65.

1

(2)  See page 20 of this Official Journal.

2

---
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, February 03, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, February 03, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0212. IN THE INTEREST OF: R. P., B. P. AND N. P., CHILDREN (FATHER) .
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 1502233 1502234 1502235
Exhibit 32.2

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEYACT OF 2002**

In connection with the annual report of EZJR, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Barry Hall, Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, to the bestof my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

i.	The Report fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

ii.	The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2014

 

 

/s/ Barry Hall	

Name: Barry Hall

Title: Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
<Page>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
Form S-3 No. 333-49499, Form S-8 No. 333-56617 and Form S-8 No. 333-56619 of
Great Lakes REIT of our report dated January 30, 2002, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Great Lakes REIT included
in the Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001 (Form 10-K). We
also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Selected
Financial Data" in the Form 10-K.

Ernst & Young LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 18, 2002