alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24075]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 468 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-71, K2025-69.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24075 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
| 1.  | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|----------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.  | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements      included in the Report. |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/Victor Karpiak                               |
|-------------------------------------------------|
| President      and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                                            |
| Dated:      May 8, 2009                         |
|                                            |
|                                            |
|                                            |
| /s/Kari Stenslie                                |
| Chief      Financial Officer                    |
| Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer |
|                                            |
| Dated:      May 8, 2009                         |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DIFANKH ASAR, a/k/a James Walter Gist,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior 

District Judge. (7:10-cr-00429-GRA-1; 7:12-cv-01650-GRA)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Difankh Asar, Appellant Pro Se. Maxwell B. Cauthen, III, 

Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Difankh Asar seeks to appeal the district court’s 

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) 

motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or 

judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(B) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Asar has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83922]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24003]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 418 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-781, K2024-74.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24003 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
N OTE : This o rder is non precedential.


# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________
ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.
, Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES, Defendant

- Appellee.

______________________

2014

- 5130

______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14

- cv

- 00459

- JFM, Senior Judge James F. Merow.

______________________

ON MOTION

______________________ P ER C URIAM

.

O R D E R
In this court’s August 19, 2014 order , we directed Isaac A. Potter, Jr. to show cause as to why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. Potter has now filed a “Motion for an Order to Show Cause,” a “Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction in the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,” and a “Motion for Relief from Judgment.” Mr. Potter’s motions Case: 14-5130 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2014POTTER v. US 2

include a “Motion to Disqualify . . . Daniel E. O. Toole (Clerk).”
This court has jurisdiction over appeals from fin al d ecision s of the United States Court of Federal Claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2). T he Court of Federal Claims , howe ver, has not yet entered a final decision in Mr. Potter’s case. Mr. Potter may, of course, file a notice of appeal after the Court of Fed eral Claims disposes of all claims and enters a final decision.

Accordingly,

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The appeal is dismissed.
(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.
(3 ) The motion to disqualify is denied. All other pending motions are denied as moot.

F OR THE C OURT

/s/ Mona Harrington Mona Harrington Chief Deputy Clerk

s30 Case: 14-5130 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2014
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2911

To strengthen the system for notifying parents of violent sexual offenders

in their communities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2000

Mr. SCHUMER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To strengthen the system for notifying parents of violent

sexual offenders in their communities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Violent Sexual Of5 fender Parental Notification Act’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE WETTERLING ACT.

7 Section 170101(e)(2) of the Violent Crime Control

8 and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C.

9 14071(e)(2)) is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 2911 IS

1 ‘‘(2) The State or any agency authorized by the

2 State shall—

3 ‘‘(A) notify members or organizations of

4 the community vulnerable to persons required

5 to register under this section of relevant infor6 mation concerning such persons that is nec7 essary to protect the public, provided that the

8 state or any agency authorized by the State

9 shall retain discretion to determine the commu10 nity members or organizations to be notified,

11 and the manner of notification;

12 ‘‘(B) make relevant information necessary

13 to protect the public concerning specific persons

14 required to register under this section available

15 to the public, free of charge, on an Internet web

16 site designed to ensure the privacy, confiden17 tiality and anonymity of users; and

18 ‘‘(C) not release the identity of a victim of

19 an offense that requires registration under this

20 section.’’.

21 SEC. 3. COSTS OF COMPLIANCE.

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Bureau of

23 Justice Assistance shall implement a program under which

24 the Director shall award a grant to each State to offset

25 costs directly associated with complying with section
3

•S 2911 IS

1 170101(e)(2) of the Violent Crime Control and Law En2 forcement Act of 1994 (as amended by this Act).

3 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—There are authorized to

4 be appropriated to carry out this subsection

5 $25,000,000 for each of the fiscal years 2001 and

6 2002.

Æ
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/23 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.86 N 77.06 WMeters AGL
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Tan, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended November 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: January 11, 2008


/s/ Kim McElroy
---------------------------------
Kim McElroy, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
CBLBHRATING

, Celebrating 25years ofprotecting New Hampshire's environment. June 29, 2012 David Conroy, Chief Air Programs Branch USEPA New

England, Region I 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-3912 Re: PM2,5 Infrastructure Submittals Dear Mr. Conroy: Your staffare reviewing the Section 110(a) infrastructure submittals made by the New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services (DES) for the 1997 and 2006 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for particulate matter smaller than 2.5 microns in diameter (PMZ,5) . In support of these submittals, DES is currently in the process of adopting by reference the federal Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) rules for PMZ.5, including the significance levels, increments, significant impact levels, and significant monitoring concentration . The chapter containing these proposed additions, Env-A 600, Statewide Permit System, currently is in a second public comment period that expires July 20, 2012. Adoption of the chapter is expected by September l, 2012. In addition to Env-A 600, DES is currently readopting with amendments Env-A 300, AmbientAir Quality Standards. The amendments will include National Ambient Air Quality Standards adopted by EPA since 2004. Adoption ofthis chapter is also expected by September l, 2012. The relevant sections of Env-A 600 and all of Env-A 300will be submitted as revisions to the New

Hampshire State Implementation Plan (SIP) shortly after their adoption, but in no event later than one year fromthe date of EPA's final action on the Section 110(a) SIP submittals. Also in support ofthese infrastructure submittals, and as Governor Lynch's designee, I am enclosing New

Hampshire statute RSA 21-0:11, I, for EPA's approval as a SIP revision. This law

establishes the Air Resources Council and requires Council members to adequately disclose all potential conflicts of interest. This statute meets the requirements ofSection 128 of the federal Clean Air Act, concerning boards with the authority to approve permits or enforcement orders. Please let me know

ifyou need additional information or ifyou have any questions. Sincerely, Craig A . Wright Acting Director Air Resources Division Enclosure 

### The State of New Hampshire 

## Department of Environmental Services

Thomas S. Burack, Commissioner

www .des.nh.gov 29 Hazen Drive " PO Box 95 " Concord, NH03302-0095 (603) 271-3503 " TDDAccess: Relay NH 1-800-735-2964
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

GERELCO TRAFFIC CONTROLS, INC., a )

Florida corporation, and AMERISURE )

INSURANCE COMPANY, )

)

Appellants, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-3701

)

STEPHANIE MING, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 11, 2019.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for 

Hillsborough County; Elizabeth G. Rice, 

Judge.

Hala Sandridge and Chance Lyman of 

Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC, Tampa,

for Appellants.

Christopher D. Codling and Robert D.

Sparks of Givens Givens Sparks, PLLC,

Tampa; and Raymond T. Elligett, Jr., and

Amy S. Farrior of Buell & Elligett, Tampa,

for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

VILLANTI, MORRIS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING FOR CERTIFICATION, COMPLIANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT

U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW. Washington, DC 20585 Room GE-086, Large Auditorium

Thursday, September 30, 2010



## Purpose

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this informal public meeting to present and discuss its proposals regarding certification, compliance, and enforcement regulations for certain consumer products and commercial and industrial equipment. These regulations provide for sampling plans used in determining compliance with existing standards, manufacturer submission of compliance statements and certification reports to DOE, maintenance of compliance records by manufacturers, and the availability of enforcement actions for improper certification or noncompliance with an applicable standard. In addition, the meeting will highlight issues for which DOE has requested fee dback from interested parties in the notice of proposed rulemaking.



## Agenda

9:00 - 9:15 am Welcome Energy-Efficiency and Renewabl e Energy and Office of the

General Counsel

9:15 - 9:30 am Attendee Introductions and Agenda Review Doug Brookman

9:30 - 9:35 am Introduction Ashley Armstrong and Laura Barhydt

9:35 – 11:00 am Brief Opening Remarks from Interested Parties Doug Brookman

11:00 - 11:15 am Break

11:15 – 12:00 pm Scope, Reorganization of DOE’s Existing CCE Regulations, Applying DOE’s Existing CCE Regulations to Other Covered Products, and Basic Model Provisions Ashley Armstrong and Laura Barhydt12:00 - 1:15 pm Lunch (on your own)

1:15 – 2:15 pm Certification, Enforcemen t Testing, Adjudication, Verification Testing, Additional Product-Specific Discussion, and Issues for

which DOE Seeks Comment Ashley Armstrong and Laura Barhydt

2:15 - 2:30 pm Break

2:30 – 3:55 pm Closing Remarks and Questions from Interested Parties Doug Brookman

3:55 – 4:00 pm Next Steps and Closing Ashley Armstrong

4:00 pm Adjourn
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   Exhibit 23.2

The Board of Directors
S1 Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements
(Nos. 333-82369, 333-82381, and 333-82383) on Form S-8, and the Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-4 (No. 333-82711) on Form S-8 of S1 Corporation of our
reports dated February 4, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheet of S1
Corporation and subsidiary as of December 31, 1998, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss),
and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31,
1998, and the related financial statement schedule, which reports appear in the
December 31, 1999, annual report on Form 10-K of S1 Corporation.


                                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
March 29, 2000
S. 322

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE FIRST SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,

the sixth day of January, one thousand nine hundred and ninety-nine

An Act

To amend title 4, United States Code, to add the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday

to the list of days on which the flag should especially be displayed.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. ADDITION OF MARTIN LUTHER KING JR. HOLIDAY TO

LIST OF DAYS.

Section 6(d) of title 4, United States Code, is amended by

inserting ‘‘Martin Luther King Jr.’s birthday, third Monday in

January;’’ after ‘‘January 20;’’.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

   WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of S1 Corporation (the
"Company"), hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)   the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004
      filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                                 /s/ MATTHEW HALE
                                                 --------------------------
                                                 Matthew Hale
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange commission or its
staff upon request.

March 15, 2005
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

s1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139822

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139822 COA: 293895 Roscommon CC: 09-005789-FH DENNIS ALLEN VOSHELL, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 7, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**NOTE
      (“the Note”)**





Power3
      Medical Products, Inc., a New York corporation (the “Company”) for value
      received hereby promises to pay **Ira
      L. Goldknopf** (“Payee”) on or before June 30, 2007, (“Maturity Date”); the principal amount
      of **one hundred six thousand one hundred seventeen dollars ($106,117.00)** (“Principal”).





Should
      the Principal not be repaid as of June 30, 2007 interest of 6 % per year on
      any
      unpaid Principal amount will be earned by the Payee until such time as all
      of
      the Principal amount is repaid. This Note may be repaid at any time prior to
      June 30, 2007 without interest or penalty.





I n
      no
      event shall interest contracted for, charged or received hereunder, plus any
      other charges in connection herewith which constitute interest, exceed the
      maximum interest permitted by applicable law. The amounts of such interest
      or
      other charges previously paid to the holder of the Note, if any, in excess
      of
      the amounts permitted by applicable law shall be applied by the holder of the
      Note to reduce the principal of the indebtedness evidenced by the Note, or,
      at
      the option of the holder of the Note, be refunded. To the extent permitted
      by
      applicable law, determination of the legal maximum amount of interest shall
      at
      all times be made by amortizing, prorating, allocating and spreading in equal
      parts during the period of the full stated term of the loan and indebtedness,
      all interest at any time contracted for, charged or received from the Maker
      hereof in connection with the loan and indebtedness evidenced hereby, so that
      the actual rate of interest on account of such indebtedness is uniform
      throughout the term hereof.





Notices,
      payments, requests, and other communications to the respective parties hereunder
      shall be in writing, and shall be deemed received when delivered personally,
      by
      facsimile, or first class certified mail, return receipt requested and postage
      prepaid, as follows:





If
      to the
      lender:





Ira
      L
      Goldknopf


3400
      Research Forest Parkway


Woodlands,
      Texas 77381





If
      to the
      Company:





Power3
      Medical Products, Inc.


3400
      Research Forest Parkway


Woodlands,
      Texas 77381





This
      Note
      is governed by and is to be construed in accordance with the law of the State
      of
      Texas.




Payee
            
            Power3 Medical Products, Inc.
            
            Date/s/ Ira L. Goldknopf
              
              Ira L. Goldknopf
            
            /s/ John P. Burton
              
              By: John P. Burton
            
            December
              31, 2006Its:
              CFO