alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                         DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                     2,466
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                              5,021
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           8,106
<PP&E>                                   449,028
<DEPRECIATION>                            22,166
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           443,689
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                     19,814
<BONDS>                                  193,623
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                               37,500
<COMMON>                                     175
<OTHER-SE>                               192,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             443,689
<SALES>                                   79,668
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                          80,898
<CGS>                                          0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                             51,702
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        12,339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           16,796
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       16,796
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                              16,796
<EPS-PRIMARY>                               0.99
<EPS-DILUTED>                               0.98
        

</TABLE>
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

COREY BROWN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-3657 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) ) Opinion filed November 6, 2019. Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Manatee County; Charles Sniffen, Judge. Corey Brown, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
CASANUEVA, LaROSE, and BADALAMENTI, JJ., Concur.
1 Date: 06/18/2015

Joshua Kalin 13079 Arbor Rdg M a dison , AL 3576

Dear Sir or Madam:
I seek an exemption from the following requirements of 14 C.F.R:

● 61.113(a) & (b)

● 91.7 (a)

● 91.103

● 91.119(c)

● 91.121

● 91.151(a) & (b)

● 91.203(a) & (b)

● 91.405(a)

● 91.407(a)(1)

● 91.409 (a)(1) & (2)

● 91.417(a)&(b)
to operate an Unmanned Aircraft System pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA).
I am requesting an exemption in order to commercially fly an Unmanned Aircraft S ystem (UAS) for the purposes of aerial photography, aerial surveying, and other similar activities. Using the UASs and safety measures described below will eliminate virtually all risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible fuel compared to a tradi tional aircraft performing the same function. The UAS will carry no passengers or crew and, therefore, will not expose them to the risks associated with manned aircraft flights. The operation of small UAS conducted in the strict conditions outlined below, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested herein, including exempting the applicant from the requirements of Part 21 and allowing commercial operations. These UASs operate at very slow speeds, close to the ground, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and people.
I plan to operate two UASs:

● DJI P hantom 3

● DJI Inspire 12 Both UASs are comprised of an unmanned aircraf t (UA) and a transportable ground station. The UA Ss are commercially produced quadcopters and will not exceed a maximum gross weight of 55 pounds

. They are equipped with four rotors driven by electric motors powered by batteries. The UA will have a small l ightweight camera attached

. The Pilot, Joshua Kalin , will provide the following levels of safety:

● I will only operate in reasonably safe environments that are strictly controlled, are away from power lines, elevated lights, airports and actively populated areas.

● I will conduct extensive preflight inspections and protocols, during which safety carries p rimary importance.

● I will operate the UA below 4 00 feet above ground level at all times.

● I will operate the UA below the maximum operating speed of 87 knots.

● I will operate the UAS for 80% of battery capacity and reserve 20% for return home and/or emergencies.

● I will land his UAS prior to the manufacturer's recommended minimum level of battery power

.

● I will operate his UAS only within visual line of sight (VLOS )

.

● I will use the UAS global positioning system (GPS) flight safety feature whereby it hovers and then slowly lands if communication with the remote control pilot is lost.

● I will contact respective airports if operations will be within 5 miles to advise th em of my estimated flight time, flight duration, elevation of flight and other pertinent information.

● I will always obtain all necessary permissions prior to UAS operation.

● I will have procedures in place to abort flights in the event of safety breaches or potential danger.
Sincerely
,

Joshua Kalin
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC. 

First Amendment to the 

Amended 2000 Incentive Stock Option Plan 

This First Amendment (this “First Amendment”) to the Amended 2000 Incentive Stock Option Plan (as amended from time to time,
the “Plan”) is made and entered into effective as of August 12, 2014 by Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”). 

WHEREAS, Section 6(j) of the Plan provides for the grant of reload options in the event that an optionee exercises an option and
pays some or all of the exercise price with shares of common stock of the Company; and 
 WHEREAS, Section 10 of the Plan
provides that the Board of Directors may, with respect to any shares of common stock of the Company not subject to options at such time, suspend, discontinue, revise or amend the Plan in any respect for any purpose which it may deem advisable,
subject to certain limited exceptions; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the date hereof, the Plan is hereby amended as
follows: 
 1. Section 6(h) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
“(h) Conditions. The Option Agreement shall provide that exercise of the Option (in whole or in part) and the issuance of Shares pursuant thereto shall be contingent upon such conditions as the Board shall in its discretion specify,
subject to the limitations contained in §3(e).”. 
 2. Section 6(j) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety. 

Except as set forth in this First Amendment, all of the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this First Amendment effective as of the date hereof. 

 

			
	ADVANCED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Mark B. Sturgeon

		 	Mark B. Sturgeon,
		 	EVP, CFO, Secretary & Treasurer
# C_2012288EN.01000201.xml

| 25.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 288/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 288/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 September 2012

adopting the Council position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2012

2012/C 288/02

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 314 thereof, in conjunction with the Treaty establishing the European Atomic and Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 of 25 June 2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the European Communities (1), as last amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1081/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 (2), and in particular Article 37 thereof,

1

2

Whereas:

| — | the Union's budget for the financial year 2012 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2011 (3), |
| --- | --- |

—

the Union's budget for the financial year 2012 was definitively adopted on 1 December 2011 (3),

3

| — | on 20 June 2012, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2012, |
| --- | --- |

—

on 20 June 2012, the Commission submitted a proposal containing draft amending budget No 4 to the general budget for the financial year 2012,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 of the European Union for the financial year 2012 was adopted on 24 September 2012.

The full text can be accessed for consultation or downloading on the Council's website: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2012.

For the Council

The President

A. D. MAVROYIANNIS

---

(1)  OJ L 248, 16.9.2002, p. 1, with corrigenda in OJ L 25, 30.1.2003, p. 43 and in OJ L 99, 14.4.2007, p. 18.

1

(2)  OJ L 311, 26.11.2010, p. 9.

2

(3)  OJ L 56, 29.2.2012, with corrigenda in OJ L 79, 19.3.2012, p. 1 and in OJ L 184, 13.7.2012, p. 19.

3

---

ANNEX

DRAFT LETTER

| from | : | President of the Council |
| --- | --- | --- |
| to | : | President of the European Parliament |

from

:

President of the Council

to

:

President of the European Parliament

Sir,

I am forwarding under separate cover the Council's position on draft amending budget No 4 for the financial year 2012, adopted by the Council on 19 September 2012.

(Complimentary close).

---
EXHIBIT
32





Certification of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Northwest,
Inc.


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the
undersigned hereby certifies in his/her capacity as an officer of First
Financial Northwest, Inc. (the “Company”) and in connection with this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, that:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in the Report.














/s/Victor
Karpiak


President
and Chief Executive Officer





Dated:
November 6, 2009








/s/Kari
Stenslie


Chief
Financial Officer


Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer





Dated:
November 6, 2009
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SupportSave Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Christopher Johns, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 12th day of October, 2007.                                                                                                                
|   

CHRISTOPHER JOHNS
Christopher Johns, President and Chief Executive Officer

















---
## Dor

- 6fcr-ZD© 4 - WB A

AIRLINE S September

13,201 0

Denni s J
. DeVany Offic e o f Aviatio n Analysi s U S Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 40 0 Sevent

h Street , S.W
. Washington , D.C
. 2059 0
SkyWes t Airline s Essential Ai r

Servic e Proposal fo

r Pendleton , Oregon
. Dea r Mr
. DeVany : Attache di s th e SkyWes t

Airline s proposal fo

r servic e t o Pendleton , Oregon
. Ou r proposal i s to provid e 1 2 roun dtrip s per week t o Portland , Orego n wit

h n o intermediate stop s or aircraf t flo w fro mother cities
. Th e servic e pattern wil l includ e tw o direc t roun d trip s pe r da y on weekday s an don e pe r da y o n weekends
. Servic e wil l b e provide d wit h th e Embraer

Brasili a(EMB-120 ) 30-sea t turbopro p aircraft
. Th e proposal perio d i s fo r Januar y 1 , 201 1 t o December

31 , 2012
. Thes e flight s wil l b e operate da s Unite d Express , pursuan t t o acode-sharin g agreement wit h Unite dAirlines , an dwil l provid e connection s in Portlan d t o th e national transportatio n system . SkyWes t welcome s th e opportunit

y to provid e reliabl e servic e if selected
. Than k you fo r your consideration
. Sincerely , 

### f c Michae l Thompso n Vic e Presiden t

- Marke t Development SkyWes t Airline sSkyWes t Airline s

Pendleto n 10-Sep-l O 2011-201 2 Pendleto n Portlan d Numbe ro f round-trip s pe rwee k Aircraf t Typ e - Embrae rBrasili a Passenge rRevenu e Passenger s Averag e Far e Revenu e Bloc k Tim e Tri p bloc k

tim e - Minute s Tota l schedule d bloc k tim e Tota l complete d bloc k tim e RPM S Passenger s Stag e Lengt h
ASM S Schedule d Departure s Compete d Departure s Stag e lengt h Availabl e Seat s 1 2

98 % $ $ 9,50 0

90.0 0 855,00 0

7 0 1,45 6 1,42 7
9,50 0 18 2

98 % 1,729,00 0

1,24 8 1,22 3 18 2 3 0 6,814,08 0
Revenu e 855,00 0 Direc t Operatin g Expense s Fligh t attendan t RP M relate d Departur e relate d AS M relate d
Operatin g incom e (loss ) 5 % profi t margi n Subsid y requiremen t SkyWes t effectiv e rate s pe runi t Pe rtri p Pe rpassenge r SkyWes t cos t pe rbloc k hou r Effectiv e Subsid y rat e pe runi t Pe rtri p Pe rpassenge r SkyWes t cos t pe rbloc k hou r Loa d facto r Averag e fue l cos t pe rgallo n BIkH r BIkH r RPM S Departure s ASM S $

S S 

### s $ 1,153.1 9 34.4 9 0.0 1 408.4 6 0.0 4 $

S $ S $ $ 

### s $ 1,645,46 0

49,21 2 21,84 3 499,56 8 263,09 7 2,479,18 1 (1,624,181 ) 123,95 9 1,748,14 0
2,02 7 26 1 1,73 7
1,42 9 18 4 1,73 7 25 % 2.7 5
Featured           From rural roots to the global stage: Local robotics team heads to global FIRST Tech Challenge robotics championship         

Featured           ORNL helping Roll-to-Roll Consortium scale up hydrogen technology         

Featured           ORNL projects receive $8M from DOE Technology Commercialization Fund in FY23         

# Advanced Reactor Engineering and Development

We leverage world-class capabilities for design and performance analysis of advanced reactor concepts and the development of advanced technologies for cost-competitive nuclear energy. 

## Advanced Reactor Engineering and Development Section Leadership

View a hi-res version of this image

**Wesley C. Williams**Group LeaderAdvanced Reactor Systems Group

Read More

View a hi-res version of this image

**Kevin R. Robb**Group LeaderEnergy Systems Development Group

Read More

View a hi-res version of this image

**Pradeep Ramuhalli**Group LeaderModern Nuclear Instrumentation and Control Group

Read More

View a hi-res version of this image

**DeLeah V. Lockridge**Group LeaderNuclear Operations and Licensing Group

Read More

View a hi-res version of this image

**Yann M. Le Pape**Group LeaderNuclear Structures and Construction Group

Read More

View a hi-res version of this image

**Alex Huning**Group LeaderRisk Methods and Analysis Group

Read More

View a hi-res version of this image

**Jorge Navarro**Group LeaderSystems Analysis and Optimization Group

Read More

### Contact

PrashantK Jain

jainpk@ornl.gov

## Current Research

## News

From rural roots to the global stage: Local robotics team heads to global FIRST Tech Challenge robotics championship

## News

ORNL helping Roll-to-Roll Consortium scale up hydrogen technology

## News

ORNL projects receive $8M from DOE Technology Commercialization Fund in FY23

## News

Molten salt reactor technology heats up at ORNL workshop
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of American Eagle Energy Inc. on Form 10-Q
for the period ending July 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Richard
Findley, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (Chief Executive Officer,
Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





September
3, 2010





/s/ Richard
  Findley


Richard
Findley,


President,
Secretary, Treasurer and Director


(Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer


and Chief
Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Nick Ciccio, Petitioner, v. Hubert Utterback, Judge, Respondent.

March 6, 1928.

*E. 8.-Thayer,*for petitioner.

*Carl 8. Missildine,*for respondent.

Evans, J.

The petitioner was cited for contempt for an alleged violation of a liquor-injunction decree. He was found guilty, and judgment was imposed. The validity of the judgment is challenged on two principal grounds: (1) That no decree of injunction had ever been issued against the petitioner prior to such citation for contempt; (2) that the court entered a decree purporting to be based upon evidence heard by the court, whereas none of such evidence or transcript thereof was filed or preserved in any manner. W.e have no argument for the State. The record before us sustains the grounds of challenge, without any doubt. It does appear from the record that the district court later amended its record, so as to show that the decree challenged by the petitioner was entered upon a plea of guilty. The writ of certiorari in this case was served on *483December 3, 1925. The purported amendment oi the record was made m April, 1926, without . notice, consent, or knowledge oi the defendant or of his counsel. It is for that reason challenged by the petitioner as of no force and effect. This challenge also must be sustained. Section 12547, Code of 1924; *State v. District Court,*124 Iowa 187; *State ex rel. Aldrich v. District Court,*133 Iowa 450; *Sergio v. Utterbach,*202 Iowa 713.

' The writ issued herein is, accordingly, sustained, and the judgment below *annulled.*— Reversed.

Stevens, C.' J., and Faville, Kindig, and Wagner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Transitional Report of Lake Victoria Mining Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q (T)/A-1 for the period end of March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Roger A. Newell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 31st day of August, 2010.








ROGER A. NEWELLRoger A. NewellChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
SCAD-22-0000099
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

D ISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE HAWAI # I SUPREME COURT, Petitioner,

vs. MICHAEL JOHN COLLINS, II, aka MICHAEL CHARLES COLLINS, aka MICHAEL JOHN COLLINS, aka MICHAEL JOHN COLLINS, XXVII

( HI bar #9087), Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ( ODC NO. 22-0051)
ORDER DISSOLVING ORDER OF SUSPENSION (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of the December 29, 2022 declarations and exhibits submitted by Respondent Collins filed with regard to his pending October 3, 2022 motion to dissolve this court’s April 5, 2022 interim suspension of his law license, imposed pursuant to Rule 2.23 of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i (RSCH), the January 5, 2023 response from the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC), the January 19, 2023 supplemental submission arranged by Respondent Collins, and the record in this matter, we conclude that Respondent Collins has made a good faith effort to comply with the terms of this court’s Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCAD-22-0000099 30-JAN-2023 10:05 AM Dkt. 136 ORDMay 31, 2022 and November 28, 2022 orders, and, importantly, is

currently cooperative with ODC in regards to his conduct which led to the instant interim suspension. Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent Collins’s October 3, 2022 motion to dissolve the April 5, 2022 interim suspension is granted. The April 5, 2022 order of suspension is dissolved, without prejudice to ODC returning to this court for further relief if it deems appropriate to do so.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent Collins shall not return to the practice of law until he fulfills any and all administrative requirements imposed by Rule 17(d) of the Rules of the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai # i , administered by the Hawai# i State Bar Association.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, January 30, 2023. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Todd W. Eddins

2
#### Albert H. Koehler, Plaintiff, *v.*Department of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York; Peter G. Ten Eyck, as Commissioner of the Department of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York; and John R. Reidy, as an Inspector and/or Deputy of the Department of Agriculture and Markets of the State of New York, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Broome County,

July 8, 1937.

See headnote in *Pavlick*v. *Department of Agriculture & Markets*(164 Misc. 42).

*Mangan & Mangan*and *Harry S. Travis,*for the plaintiff.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General; Henry Epstein, Solicitor-General; Milo R. Kniffen, Counsel to Department of Agriculture and Markets [Robert G. Blabey, Assistant Counsel,*of counsel], for the defendants.

McNaught, J.

For the reasons outlined in *Pavlick*v. *Department of Agriculture & Markets*(164 Misc. 42), decided concurrently herewith, the motion of the plaintiff for an injunction *pendente lite*is denied, without costs.

The motion of the defendants to dismiss the complaint is granted without costs, upon the ground that the complaint now fails to state cause of action, as it seeks to enjoin the enforcement and to secure a declaratory judgment of unconstitutionality as to a statute that by legislation has ceased to exist.

Submit orders accordingly.