CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

– Page 1

(Electronic Format)

I. GENERAL INFORMATION

District: Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District

Rule No(s): 1113 Date adopted/Amended/Rescinded: Amended 4/23/2012

Rule Title(s): Architectural Coatings

Date Submitted to ARB: 9/21/2012

If an Amended Rule, Date Last Amended (or Adopted): 2/24/2003

Is the Rule Intended to be Sent to the U.S. EPA as a SIP Revision? Yes No ( If No, do not complete remainder of form)

District Contact: Sarah M. Strout Phone Number: (760) 245

- 1661 x 1803 E

- mail Address: sstrout @md aqmd.ca.gov

Narrative Summary of New Rule or Rule Changes: New Rule Amended Rule

The amendments to Rule 1113 are necessary to conform the rule to the CARB SCM for Architectural Coatings, to

comply w ith the CCAA requirements for nonattainment areas to attain the state air quality standards as

expeditiously as possible and to comply with the FCAA requirements for nonattainment areas to impose RACT for

all existing major sources of air pollution.

Poll utant(s) Regulated by the Rule (Check): ROG (NOx) SO2

(CO) PM TAC (name):

II. EFFECT ON EMISSIONS

Complete this section ONLY for rules that, when implemented, will result in quantifiable changes in emissions. Attach refere nce(s) for emission

factor(s) and other information. Attach calculation sheet showing how the emi ssion information provided below was determined

.

Net Effect on Emissions: Increase Decrease N/A

Emission Reduction Commitment in SIP for this Source Category: N/A

Inven tory Year Used to Calculate Changes in Emissions: N/A Area Affected: N/A

Future Year Control Profile Estimate (Provide information on as many years as possible) :

N/ACALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/ AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 2

(Electronic Format)

Baseline Inventory in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Emissions Reduction Commitment in the SIP for the Control Measure: N/A

Revised Baseline Inventory (if any): N/A

Revised Emission Reduction Estimate (if developed): N/A

Note that the district’s input to the Rule Evaluation Form will not be used as input to the ARB’s emission forecasting and

planning.

III. SOURCES/ATTAINMENT STATUS

District is: Attainment Nonattainment Split

Approximate Total Number of Small (<100 TPY) Sources Affected by this Amendment: 100

Percent in Nonattainment Area: 95 %

Numb er of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled: 0 Percent in Nonattainment Area: 0 %

Name(s) and Location(s) (city and county) of Large ( > 100 TPY) Sources Controlled by Rule (Attach additional sheets as

necessary) : N/A

IV. EMISSION REDUCTION TECHNOLOGY

Does the Rule Include Emission Limits that are Continuous? Yes No

If Yes, Those Limits are in Section(s) Table 1 and Table 2 of the Rule.

Other Methods in th e Rule for Achieving Emission Reductions are: Painting Practices Section (C)(6)

V. OTHER REQUIREMENTS

The Rule Contains:

Emission Limits in Section(s): (C)(1) Work Practice Standards in Section(s): (C)(6)

Recordkeeping Requirements in Section(s): (E) Reporting Requirements in Section(s): (E)5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD



### APCD/AQMD RULE EVALUATION FORM

- Page 3

(Electronic Format)

VI. IMPACT ON AIR QUALITY PLAN

No Impact Impacts RFP Impacts attainment

Discussion: The potential environmental impacts of the SCM for Architectural Coatings on a statewide level were

addressed by CARB in its Final Program Env ironmental Impact Report for Suggested Control Measure for Architectural

Coatings (June 2000). The analysis concluded that implementing the 2000 SCM would have no significant impacts, but

would have a net air quality benefit. CARB believes that the Distr ict can use the Technical Support Document and the EIR

from the 2000 SCM to support their environmental impact analyses in adopting 1113

– Architectural Coatings based on the

2007 SCM.