alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Joseph C. Smith, Appellant.

Murder: punishment: discretion of court. A sentence of death on a plea of guilty to an indictment for murder will not be interfered with on appeal, unless an abuse of the court’s discretion in pronouncing judgment is shown.

*Appeal from, Monroe District*Court.— HoN. M. A. Nobeets, J udge.

Tuesday, June 6, 1905.

DeeeNDANT was indicted for murder. To this indictment he entered a plea of guilty, and, after hearing the evidence, the court ordered that he be hanged. From the judgment so entered the defendant appeals.

*Affirmed.*

*J@hn F. Clarhson*and *David W.*Bates, for appellant.

*529
      *Charles W. Mullan,*Attorney-General, and *Lawrence De*Graff, Assistant Attorney-General, for tbe State.

Deembe, J.

There is no doubt whatever of the defendant’s guilt. Indeed, his counsel distinctly assert that there was no legal justification or excuse for his act. But they do contend that the punishment should have been life imprisonment instead of death. No error was committed by the trial court, unless it be found that it abused its discretion in fixing the penalty. Code, section 4728, provides, in substance, that whoever is guilty of murder in the first degree shall be punished with death or imprisonment for life, as determined by the court, if the defendant pleads guilty. Manifestly, a large discretion is vested in the trial court in such cases, and we should not interfere in the absence of a showing of abuse of that discretion. The case comes to us for correction of errors, and not that we may exercise the pardoning power. Commutation of sentence does not belong to this department of government. We have carefully gone over the entire record and find no abuse of the discretion vested in the trial court.

The judgment is therefore *affirmed.*
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2952

To provide technical assistance, capacity building grants, and organizational

support to private, nonprofit community development organizations, including religiously-affiliated organizations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. TORRICELLI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

A BILL

To provide technical assistance, capacity building grants, and

organizational support to private, nonprofit community

development organizations, including religiously-affiliated

organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Faith-Based and Com5 munity-Based Organizations in Housing and Community

6 Development Act of 2000’’.
2

•S 2952 IS

1 SEC. 2. FAITH-BASED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANTS.

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Director of the Center for

3 Community and Interfaith Partnerships of the Depart4 ment of Housing and Urban Development (referred to in

5 this section as the ‘‘Director’’) may award grants to pri6 vate, nonprofit community-based organizations (including

7 social service organizations and community development

8 corporations) in accordance with this section.

9 (b) RELIGIOUS ORGANIZATIONS.—In awarding

10 grants under this section, the Director shall consider reli11 gious organizations on the same basis as other nongovern12 mental entities.

13 (c) USE OF FUNDS.—Amounts provided under a

14 grant awarded under this section may only be used for

15 activities that—

16 (1) develop the capacity and ability of organiza17 tions described in subsection (a) to undertake com18 munity development and affordable housing projects

19 and programs;

20 (2) promote the goal of fair housing;

21 (3) assist the Secretary of Housing and Urban

22 Development in the disposition of foreclosed prop23 erties; or

24 (4) increase the effectiveness of the programs

25 carried out by the Secretary of Housing and Urban

26 Development in distressed high poverty areas.
3

•S 2952 IS

1 (d) PROHIBITION ON SECTARIAN USE OF FUNDS.—

2 No amount provided under a grant awarded under this

3 section may be used for sectarian worship, instruction, or

4 proselytization.

5 (e) FUNDING.—Section 107(a)(1) of the Housing and

6 Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C.

7 5307(a)(1)) is amended—

8 (1) in the matter preceding subparagraph (A),

9 by striking ‘‘$60,000,000’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘$80,000,000’’;

11 (2) in subparagraph (H), by striking ‘‘and’’ at

12 the end;

13 (3) in subparagraph (I), by striking the period

14 at the end and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and

15 (4) by adding at the end the following:

16 ‘‘(J) $20,000,000 shall be available to

17 carry out section 2 of the Faith-Based and

18 Community-Based Organizations in Housing

19 and Community Development Act of 2000.’’.

Æ
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2854

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fructooligosaccharides (FOS).

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 12, 2000

Mr. ALLARD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on Fructooligosaccharides

(FOS).

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF DUTY.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new heading:

‘‘ 9902.21.01 Fructooligosaccharides (FOS) (provided for in subheading

2106.90.99) ......... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2003

’’.
2

S 2854 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

2 this section applies with respect to goods entered, or with3 drawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after the

4 15th day after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF


CORPORATE EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§ 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Equity Finance, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Chad B. Beemer, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/S/Chad B. Beemer


Chad B. Beemer Chandler


Chief Executive Officer


August 18, 2009





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83072]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23735]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN COMMISSION


Minor Modification Notice

AGENCY: Susquehanna River Basin Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists the minor modifications approved for 
previously approved projects by the Susquehanna River Basin Commission 
during the period set forth in DATES.

DATES: September 1-30, 2024

ADDRESSES: Susquehanna River Basin Commission, 4423 North Front Street, 
Harrisburg, PA 17110-1788.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jason E. Oyler, General Counsel and 
Secretary to the Commission, telephone: (717) 238-0423, ext. 1312; fax 
(717) 238-2436; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e68c899f8a8394a695948485c8818990"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b515442575e497b48495958155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>. Regular mail inquiries may be 
sent to the above address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice lists previously approved 
projects, receiving approval of minor modification, described below, 
pursuant to 18 CFR 806.18 or to Commission Resolution Nos. 2013-11 and 
2015-06, for the time period specified above.
    1. Tower City Borough Authority--Well 7, Docket No. 20240624, 
Porter Township, Schuylkill County, Pa.; modification approval to 
change the monitoring condition; Approval Date: September 4, 2024.
    Authority: Public Law 91-575, 84 Stat. 1509 et seq., 18 CFR parts 
806 and 808.

    Dated: October 9, 2024.
Jason E. Oyler,
General Counsel and Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-23735 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7040-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dana S.
Philbrook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|
|

|/s/ Dana S. Philbrook                     
|------------------------------------------
|Dana  S. Philbrook Chief Financial Officer



September 17, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2009 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 /s/ PAUL M. PARRISHPaul  M. ParrishChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
#### State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Estate of Philip Goettelman, Appellant.

TAXATION: Collateral Inheritance Tax — Devise Passing to Adopted Son of Predeceased Devisee. A devise of personalty which passes directly to the adopted son of a devisee because the devisee predeceased the testator, is subject to a collateral inheritance tax. (See. 1481 -al, Code Supp., 1913.)

*Appeal from Winneshiek District Court.*— W. J. Springer, Judge.

December 13, 1921.

Aotion to determine whether certain personal property is subject to a collateral inheritance tax. Finding and judgment in favor of the *State.*

Affirmed.

*E. B. Acres,*for appellant.

*J. A. Nelson,*for appellee.

Stevens, J.

This ease was tried in the court below upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that Philip Goettelman died testate in Winneshiek County, May 8, 1919, and that by the terms of his will he bequeathed $2,122.37 to his son Philip, who predeceased his father, leaving surviving him his widow and Herbert Goettelman, an adopted son.

The sole question presented for our decision is whether the portion of the estate bequeathed to the deceased legatee that went to his adopted son is subject to the payment of the collateral inheritance tax. This question is fully answered by our former decisions. Under Code Section 3281, which provides that, Pif a devisee die before the testator, his heirs shall inherit the property devised to him, unless from the terms of the will *k*contrary intent is manifest,” the bequest to the predeceased legatee did not lapse, but passed directly from the testator to the heirs of the deceased legatee.

*809Section 1481-al of tbe 1913 Supplement provides that:

"The tax imposed by this act shall not be collected * * *

(3) When the property passes to the father, mother, lineal descendant, adopted child, or the lineal descendant of an adopted child of decedent.”

Herbert Goettelman, the adopted son of the deceased legatee, was not a lineal descendant or adopted child of the testator, and therefore, as he took directly from the testator, whatever he received as the heir of his adopted father is subject to the payment of the collateral inheritance tax. The facts stipulated bring the case squarely within our holding in the following cases: *In*re *Estate of Hulett,*121 Iowa 423; *Lawley v. Keyes,*172 Iowa 575; *Tennant v. Smith,*173 Iowa 264; *Whitney v. Whitney,*178 Iowa 117; *McAllister v. McAllister,*183 Iowa 245.

It follows that the judgment of the court below *is*— Affirmed.

Evans, C. J., Arthur and Faville, JJ., concur.
ENDORSEMENT NO.1 WORKING LAYER CATASTROPHE EXCESS OF LOSS REINSURANCE CONTRACT



 EXHIBIT 10.41 
  





 
 ENDORSEMENT NO. 1 

to the 
 WORKING LAYER
CATASTROPHE EXCESS OF LOSS REINSURANCE CONTRACT 
 (hereinafter called the “Contract”) 

EFFECTIVE: JUNE 1, 2013 

issued to 
 HOMEOWNERS CHOICE
PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 
 TAMPA, FLORIDA 

(hereinafter called the “Reinsured”) 

by 
 NATIONAL
LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 
 (hereinafter called, with other participants, the “Reinsurers”) 

Effective June 1, 2014, the Contract has been amended as follows: 

Subparagraph (b) of Paragraph (1) of ARTICLE 6 – RETENTION AND LIMIT, shall now read as follows: 

Reinsured’s Retention, as respects all loss or losses arising out of Loss Occurrences commencing during the Contract Year effective
June 1, 2014, shall equal $38,000,000. 
 Sub-subparagraph (ii) of Subparagraph (a) of Paragraph (3) of ARTICLE 6 –
RETENTION AND LIMIT, shall now read as follows: 
 $44,000,000 for Contract Year effective June 1, 2014. 

All other Terms and Conditions remain unchanged. 

Signed in                     , on this
     day of             , 2014 
 NATIONAL
LIABILITY & FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY 
  

			
	BY:	 	  

		
	TITLE:	 	  



  
 



 
  

			
	 ARP-HCI-02-CAT-WRK-13
  

DOC: May 16, 2014
	  	Endorsement No. 1 – BRK










 



 
  

 Signed in
                , on this      day of             , 2014 

HOMEOWNERS CHOICE PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY 

TAMPA, FLORIDA 
  

			
	BY:	 	  

		
	TITLE:	 	  



  
 



 
  

			
	 ARP-HCI-02-CAT-WRK-13
  

DOC: May 16, 2014
	  	Endorsement No. 1 – BRK
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Scottish Re Group Limited (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the annual period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Paul Goldean, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

/s/ Paul Goldean
-------------------

Paul Goldean
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 1, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Scottish Re Group Limited and will be retained by Scottish Re Group
Limited and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 97-10218

Summary Calendar

 

EDDIE MARTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CHARLES MARTIN; DON MAJURE; ROBERT G. ESTRADA;

LEE ANN HALDANE; H. BEAVERS; MELINDA BOZARTH,

Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:96-CV-292-X

---------------------

January 15, 1998

Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Eddie Martin, Texas inmate #651314, appeals the district

court’s dismissal of his civil rights lawsuit, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), for failure to state a claim

upon which relief could be granted. Martin also moves this court

for appointment of counsel on appeal and for leave to supplement

the record on appeal.

Martin’s motions for appointment of counsel and for leave to
No. 97-10218 

- 2 -

supplement the record on appeal are DENIED. 

The district court did not err in dismissing Martin’s § 1983

claims pursuant to Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994),

and McGrew v. Texas Bd. of Pardons and Paroles, 47 F.3d 158, 161

(5th Cir. 1995), because Martin has not demonstrated that the

revocation of his parole has been reversed, invalidated, or

otherwise set aside. See Johnson v. McElveen, 101 F.3d 423, 424

(5th Cir. 1996). The district court properly dismissed Martin’s

complaint pursuant to § 1915A(b)(1).

Martin has not challenged the district court’s reasons for

dismissing his claims against Attorney Estrada and thus, Martin

has abandoned the issue. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy

Sheriff Abner, 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987) (when appellant

fails to identify error in the district court's analysis, it is

as if the appellant had not appealed that judgment; this court

will not raise and discuss legal issues that the appellant has

failed to assert). 

Martin’s appeal is without arguable merit and is frivolous. 

See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983). 

Because the appeal is frivolous, it is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir.

R. 42.2. Martin is cautioned that any additional frivolous

appeals filed by him or on his behalf will invite the imposition

of sanctions. To avoid sanctions, Martin should review any

pending appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that

are frivolous.
No. 97-10218 

- 3 -

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED; MOTIONS DENIED.
EXHIBIT 32
 
 HCi VioCare
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted), Sotirios Leontaritis, Chief Executive Officer and President of HCi VioCare (the "Company"), and Grigorios Tsourtos, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1.        The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2014 to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 2.        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of the period covered by the Report.
  
 DATE: May 20, 2014
By:
/s/ Sotirios LeontaritisName:
Sotirios LeontaritisTitle:
Chief Executive Officer & President(Principal Executive Officer)DATE: May 20, 2014
By:
/s/ Grigorios TsourtosName:
Grigorios TsourtosTitle:
Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Report pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code and, accordingly, is not being filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of the Report and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.)
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Ameritrans Capital Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 28, 2010 (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.  Date: September 28, 2010/s/ Michael R. Feinsod
Michael R. Feinsod
Chief Executive Officer
MEMORANDUM Subject: Summary of Stakeholder Meeting including a Discussion on Ozone NAAQS Proposal From: Martha Keating To: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0699 Date: February 18, 2015 On January 29, 2015, staff members from the U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, particpated in a teleconference with representatives from the National Association of Wheat Growers (NAWG). The EPA staff presented and overview and fielded general questions pertaining to the Agency’s November 25, 2015, proposed revisions to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone. The materials presented may be found at EPA’s website for ground level ozone: http://www.epa.gov/groundlevelozone/pdfs/2014decwebinar.pdf

The attendees were as follows: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Robin Dunkins Karen Wesson

NAWG Attendees Bob Wisness ,Chair - North Dakota Nicole Berg, Vice Chair - Washington Eric Spates - Maryland Shawn Ehlerding - Ohio Raymond Parrish - Oklahoma Tyler Hansel for Jerry Marguth - Oregon Carl Schwab - South Dakota Freddie Streit - Texas David Schemm, NAWG Secretary-Treasurer

Other attendees Keira Franz Dan Wogsland Chuck Studer Ned Moon Larry Cochran Jack Irvin Steelee Fishbacher Steven Lacy