alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF SILVER CINEMAS INTERNATIONAL, INC. AS OF
DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND THE RELATED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE TWELVE-MONTH PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,880,955
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,210,328
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    560,886
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             4,652,169
<PP&E>                                      71,463,723
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,550,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             132,392,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        8,084,731
<BONDS>                                    100,110,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                 35,987,442
<COMMON>                                         1,405
<OTHER-SE>                                (18,542,892)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               132,392,418
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            77,215,881
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               85,137,146
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,940,021
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,864,453)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,864,453)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,864,453)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SuccessFactors, Inc. (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

Lars Dalgaard, the Chief Executive Officer of
SuccessFactors, Inc., each certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. the Report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and

2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of SuccessFactors, Inc.



|                       |  |  |  |                   |  |        |  |                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------- |  | ------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 9, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Lars Dalgaard
|                       |  |  |  |                   |  | Name:  |  | Lars Dalgaard                        
|                       |  |  |  |                   |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer and President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-1265

ALLAN L. GANT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-95-948-2)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 21, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Allan L. Gant, Appellant Pro Se. Rebecca A. Betts, United States

Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. Gant v. FBI, No. CA-95-948-2

(S.D.W. Va. Feb. 12, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: 

FRANK ENRIQUEZ, Individually and as the 

Personal Representative of the Estate of 

CHRISTINE RAMIREZ, and for all wrongful 

death beneficiaries,

 Relator.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00008-CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus against 

the Honorable Sergio Enriquez, Judge of the 448th District Court of El Paso County, Texas, and 

concludes that Relator’s petition for writ of mandamus should be denied as moot. We therefore 

deny the petition for writ of mandamus as moot in accordance with the opinion of this Court. 

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge _ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR chemical class = MW with unknown mp (P); log Kow = 5.4 (P); S = 1 mg/L at 20 C (M); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) Acute Concentration of Concern ( p pb) Chronic 1

SARs SAR Class TSCA New Chemcial Category ;

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Fate assessor: Ecotox assessor: Health assessor:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A22A0560. DENNIS A. BROWN v. AMY McCRORY BROWN.

Dennis A. Brown and Amy McCrory Brown were divorced in 2013. The final

order and decree of divorce incorporated a settlement agreement and a separate

“Terms of Sale Agreement” addressing the disposition of the marital residence. Amy

subsequently filed a motion for contempt, alleging that Dennis had violated the Terms

of Sale Agreement when he refused to allow her to exercise her right to purchase the

property. In September, 2021, the trial court entered an order holding Dennis in

contempt and requiring him to sell Amy hisinterest in the marital residence under the

terms of the parties’ agreement. Dennis filed this direct appeal from that order. We,

however, lack jurisdiction.

In his notice of appeal, Dennis asserts he has the right to a direct appeal under

OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (2). Appeals from orders in domestic relations cases, however,

including orders holding or declining to hold persons in contempt, must be pursued

by discretionary application. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (2); Russo v. Manning, 252 Ga.

155, 155 (312 SE2d 319) (1984). And “[f]ailure to follow the discretionary

procedures when required deprives this court of jurisdiction.” In the Interest of C. M.

L., 260 Ga. App. 502, 503 (1) (580 SE2d 276) (2003). Dennis Brown’s failure to

follow the discretionary appeal procedure, therefore, deprives us of jurisdiction over

this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED. 

November 18, 2021
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

11/18/2021
CERTIFICATE  OF  AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                            ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION
                                       OF
                             TRIVANTAGE GROUP, INC.
                            (After Issuance of Stock)


     I,  the  undersigned  officers  of  Trivantage  Group,  Inc.,  a  Nevada
corporation,  do  hereby  certify:

     1.     That  the  Directors  of  said  corporation,  on  January  4,  2002,
unanimously  adopted  a  resolution  to  amend  the  articles  as  follows:

     Article  I of the Restated Articles of Incorporation of this corporation is
hereby  amended  to  read  as  follows:
                                     ____

     FIRST.     The  name  of  the  corporation  shall  be:

     PROTEO,  INC.

     Article  IV  of the Articles of Incorporation of this corporation is hereby
supplemented  by  adding  the  following:

     The shares of common stock of the corporation shall be subject to a one for
one  hundred  fifty  reverse  stock  split.

                                      ____

     2.     The  number of shares of the corporation outstanding and entitled to
vote  on  an  amendment to the Articles of Incorporation is 196,289,200 that the
said  changes  and  amendments have been consented to and approved by a majority
all  of the stockholders of each class of stock outstanding and entitled to vote
thereon.


/s/ Joerg Alte
Joerg  Alte,  President
#### State ex rel. Syarto, Appellant, vs. Barber, Respondent.

*October 7*

November *9, 1954.*

*75The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of the *Attorney General*and *William A. Plats,*assistant attorney general, *William J. McCauley,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, *Oliver L. O’Boyle,*corporation counsel, and *George E. Rice,*assistant corporation counsel, and for the respondent on the brief of *John L. Newman*of Milwaukee.

Gehl, J.

The state demands a new trial. That it may, upon a satisfactory showing and under some circumstances, have one is held in *State ex rel. Mahnke v. Kablitz,*217 Wis. 231, 258 N. W. 840. Because a new trial must be had we deem it unnecessary to say more about the evidence than to point out that we are convinced that at the close of the state’s case there was testimony establishing every circumstance essential to conviction and that in the absence of contradictory testimony the court should not have dismissed the action. The trial court misconstrued *State v. Van Patten,*236 Wis. 186, 294 N. W. 560. It is true that in that case the court *76pointed to the unusual circumstance that the complaining witness never accused defendant of being responsible for her pregnancy until she swore to the complaint, a circumstance also present in this case, and the sole basis for the court’s action. But the court did not there grant a new trial for that reason. There were errors in the instructions and the court made it plain that it considered that those errors, coupled with circumstances of the improbability of the story of the witness, required a new trial in the interests of justice. It is impossible to read out of the opinion in the *Van Patten Case*any suggestion that a new trial would have been ordered solely upon the ground of the improbability of the complaining witness’ story.

It is clear, therefore, that the trial court proceeded on a mistaken view of the law. Because of the error it is considered that we should exercise the power conferred upon this court by sec. 251.09, Stats., and remit the case for a new trial.

By *the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded with instructions to enter an order for a new trial.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 18

- 00887

- CV

John SALAS

,

Appellant

v.

THE CARLSON LAW FIRM

, Appellee

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 20847 Honorable Karen H. Pozza, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE MARTINEZ , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to dismiss appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. Costs of the appeal are taxed agains t appellant.

SIGNED March 13, 2019.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice
1)
    
    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Northfield Bancorp, Inc.;2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2008/s/ John W. AlexanderJohn W. AlexanderChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer 32
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-69,810-07

EX P ARTE JAMES BE LL MCCOY, SR., Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. W02-02115V(C ) IN THE 292 DISTRICT COURT N D F ROM DALLAS COUNTY
Per curiam . O R D E R Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of ag g ravated sexual assault of a

child and sente nced to thirty -five year s’ imprisonment. After a revie w of the rec ord, we find that Applicant’s complaint reg arding the denial of work time cre dit is without mer it. See E x parte Palomo , 759 S.W .2d 671, 674 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988). There fore , we de ny

relief
. Applicant’s claims reg arding ineffe ctive assistance of counsel and the validity of the indictment are dismiss ed as subse quent. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O . Art. 11.07 §4(a)-( c).2

Filed: J anuar

y 13, 2016 Do not publish
Rialto CAPITAL(logo)  2018 Annual
Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)  Pooling
and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of September 1, 2012 by and among UBS Commercial
Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer,
Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian relating to the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage
Trust 2012-C3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C3 (UBS-Barclays 2012-C3)  The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:  1.
    All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.2.
    A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.3.
    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.  Certified by:
    /s/ Adam Singer
    
    Date: March 1, 2019Adam Singer, Managing Director
```

                                 CORRESPONDENCE
                      Certification Pursuant to 906 by CEO

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Surgical Safety Products, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Timothy Novak, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, to the best of
my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully compiles with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                    /s/ Timothy Novak
                                        Timothy Novak
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Power 3 Medical Products, Inc.  Inc.
April 14, 2004
```
Order entered April 2 6 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 12
- 01386
- CV
HARRY DAVIS D/B/A FI RST HOME CONSULTING, Appellant
V. CITIBANK, NA, AS TRU STEE FOR, WAMU SERIE S 2007
- HE2 TRUST, Ap pellee On Appeal from the 1 91st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC
- 11
- 12737 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellant’s April 2 4 , 2013 amended second motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellant shall file his brief on or before May 22, 2013. We c aution appellant that no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0354

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LEROY MICHAEL CHARLES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including April 12, 2024 within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 6 2024

03/06/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0354
Exhibit 32.1

MF Global Ltd.

Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of MF Global Ltd. (together with its subsidiaries, the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kevin R. Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: August 13, 2008/s/ Kevin R. DavisKevin R. DavisChief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 99.1 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report of Information
Holdings Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Mason P. Slaine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that: (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.  /s/
Mason P. Slaine Mason
P. Slaine President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director March 28,
2003