alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SHARE

# Power Electronics Accelerator Consortium for Electrification 

                  -  Clean Energy 
                  -  Electricity and Smart Grid 

The Power electronics Accelerator Coalition for Electrification (PACE) is a coalition of research institutions, utilities, and industry manufacturers working to take power electronics innovations to grid-level pilot demonstration and use in the field. Stakeholders combine forces to speed up broad adoption of these technologies, which are vital to support wider integration of clean energy systems in the U.S. electric grid. 

Meeting U.S. goals of shifting to a carbon-neutral, domestic energy power sector by 2050 will require modernizing grid architecture and system management. This means an expanded role for power electronics, which provide improved reliability, automation, and intelligence compared to mechanical systems.

PACE will drive these advances at all levels, from primary components to transmission-level grid integration. Power electronics systems are a cross-cutting technology supporting solar, wind and hydrogen energy generation as well as battery storage, electric vehicles, and buildings. Developing modular, interoperable power electronics components for each stage of power delivery will enhance electric reliability and make grid integration more affordable for utilities and their customers.

The PACE framework consists of four primary research areas that correspond with various stages of technology development: 
                - Advanced components and power stages
                - Advanced converter systems
                - Resource integration and management
                - Grid integration and demonstration

The coalition provides a framework to incubate ideas and provide hardware and software services to take the idea to fruition, then provide a platform to transition the technology to field demonstration. A variety of pathways are available for partnership opportunities, including basic research and development programs, tech collaborations, and industry-led projects. 

## Get involved

Learn more
---

Exhibit 99.18

CONSENT OF GEOLOGIST

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the
undersigned companys name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report
entitled Mineral Resource Estimate On The J Zone Uranium Deposit, Waterbury
Lake Property dated September 6, 2013 and (2) all other references to the
undersigned company included or incorporated by reference in the registration
statement in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp.



Dated: March 12, 2015



/s/ Allan ArmitageAllan Armitage, Ph.D.,
P.Geol.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7209

WILLIS R. STOLLINGS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM DUNCIL, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Charles H. Haden II, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-446-2)

Submitted: October 31, 1997 Decided: November 12, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, ERVIN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willis R. Stollings, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr.,

Victor Shawn Woods, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Charleston,

West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997). We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Stollings v. Duncil, No. CA-97-446-2 (S.D.W. Va. Aug.

13, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
I,  Lindsay Gorrill, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Star Gold Corp. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  December 12, 2008/s/  Lindsay GorrillBy:Lindsay GorrillPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of Pacific Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce Thomsen, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.   May 12, 2011  /s/ Bruce Thomsen Bruce Thomsen Principal Executive Officer Principal Accounting Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Timothy S. Nelson, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2008



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Timothy S. Nelson                          
|Timothy S. Nelson                              
|President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
|(Principal Executive Officer)
# L_2018190EN.01002001.xml

| 27.7.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 190/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 190/20

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 36/2012 of 18 January 2012 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria and repealing Regulation (EU) No 442/2011

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 16 of 19 January 2012
  )

On page 22, Annex IIa (List of entities or bodies referred to in Articles 14 and 15(1)(b)), ‘Entities’, entry No 1 (concerning Commercial Bank of Syria), in column ‘Identifying Information’:

for:

‘... SWIFT/BIC CMSY SY DA; ...’,

read:

‘... SWIFT/BIC CMSYSYDA; ....’.

---
```
[Federal Register: April 26, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 79)]
[Notices]               
[Page 21577]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr26ap10-19]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

[Docket No. APHIS-2010-0009]

 
Notice of Request for Extension of Approval of an Information 
Collection; Communicable Diseases in Horses

Correction

    In notice document 2010-9054 on page 20559 in the issue of April 
20, 2010, make the following correction:
    On page 20559, in the third column, ``Estimated annual number of 
responses per respondent: 197,124.'' should read ``Estimated annual 
number of responses per respondent: 197.124.''

[FR Doc. C1-2010-9054 Filed 4-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0425 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 2 -NM - 224 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Ave, S.W. 

Renton, Washington 98057-3356 

January 18, 2011 

Mr. Anthony Beck 

Gulfstream 

P.O. Box 2206 

Savannah, GA 31402-2206 

Dear Mr. Beck: 

We have received your petition, dated November 1, 2010. In that letter, you requested 

partial exemption from the requirements of § 25.981(a)(3) of Title 14 of Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) for the Gulfstream Model GVI airplane that is currently being 

evaluated for FAA type certification. The exemption, if granted, would permit relief from 

the requirements of fuel-tank structural lightning protection. 

Your request, which you sent to the Department of Transportation’s Federal Document 

Management System, Docket No. FAA-2010-1119, will be processed by this office. We 

have determined that any grant of exemption in this case would not set a precedent. 

Therefore, we are waiving the requirement for Federal Register publication and the public 

comment period. Although we have waived the publication and comment period, you 

should not construe this action to be tacit approval of your request. 

If you have any questions or concerns regarding your petition or the petition process, please 

contact Mike Dostert, (425) 227-2132, mike.dostert@faa.gov. 

/s/ 

Maria G. Delgado 

Transport Standards Staff 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

Aircraft Certification Service
|     1.       | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|     2.       | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  /s/ Stephen F. Groth      |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Stephen F. Groth                                         |   |
| Vice President and Chief Financial Officer               |   |
| May 14, 2010                                             |   |
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

Eachof the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of AugustTechnology Corporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofhis knowledge:

 

(1)                                  The Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K for the period endedDecember 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 11,  2005 |                     |
|-----------------------|--------------------------|
|                  |                     |
|                  | /s/ Jeff L.  O’Dell |   |
|                  | Jeff L. O’Dell      |
|                  | Chief Executive Officer  |
|                  |                     |
|                  |                     |
|                  | /s/ Stanley D.  Piekos   |   |
|                  | Stanley D. Piekos        |
|                  | Chief Financial Officer  |
|                       |                          |  |  |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to August Technology Corporation and will be retained by August Technology Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

 WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of S1 Corporation (the "Company"),
hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)   the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the annual period ended December
      31, 2005 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

                                                   /s/ JAMES S. MAHAN, III
                                                   ----------------------------
                                                   James S. Mahan, III
                                                   Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange commission or its
staff upon request.

March 15, 2006
November , 2014 

Mr. Kevin Schlemmer, Chief, EAS Division 

Office of Aviation Analysis 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

Jim Leslie, President 

Alaska Waters, Inc. 

PO Box 1978 

Wrangell, AK 99929 

Re: Continuation of Alaska Airlines' Essential Air Service at Cordova, Gustavus, 

Petersburg, Wrangell, and Yakutat, Alaska, Docket OST-1998-4899 

Dear Mr. Schlemmer : 

This letter is to express strong support for the selection of Alaska Airlines to continue to 

provide essential air service to our community. 

Alaska's service connects Southeast Alaska passengers to one or more major 

communities of interest, with single-plane service to Anchorage, Juneau, Ketchikan or 

Seattle. From these hubs, our community can access the airline's extensive route 

system and benefit from its marketing relationships with other carriers. The passenger 

and cargo aircraft, which Alaska Airlines proposes to continue using on this route, 

provides freight, mail and cargo capacity that other carriers simply cannot provide. 

Further, Alaska Airlines aircraft are equipped with Required Navigation Performance 

Technology, which enables the airline to reliably access the airport during inclement 

weather, thus reducing diversions and cancellations and, in turn, enabling people and 

products to dependably reach the community. 

Simply put, Alaska Airlines' service is critical to the economic well being of our 

community and (1/we) support their application to provide Essential Air Service to 

Southeast Alaska. 

Sincerely, 

Jim Leslie, President 

Alaska Waters, Inc.
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-14-00124-CR

JEFFREY TODD BLACKBURN,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law

Walker County, Texas

Trial Court No. 13-0194

ORDER

The appellant’s brief is overdue in this appeal. 

We abate this appeal to the trial court to conduct any necessary hearings within 

30 days of the date of this Order pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

38.8(b)(2) and (3). TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b)(2), (3).

The supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records required by the rule, if any, are 

ordered to be filed within 45 days of the date of this Order. See id.

PER CURIAM
Blackburn v. State Page 2

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and

Justice Scoggins

Appeal abated

Order issued and filed September 4, 2014