alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ATTACHMENT 2 PROPOSED LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS

PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE

SECTION 40727 AND CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GUIDELINES (14 CCR § 15000 ET SEQ.) FOR PROPOSED AMENDED RULE 2, DEFINITIONS

1. NECESSITY: Amendments to Rule 2 are necessary to reduce ambient ozone levels by allowing the substitution of reactive organic compounds with less photochemically reactive

solvents. This rule action will move Ventura C ounty closer to the goal of attaining state and federal ambient air quality standards for ozone , and make VCAPCD definitions consistent with recent US EPA and CARB advancements in air quality control regulation.

2. AUTHORITY: The Ventura County Air Polluti on Control District is authorized and required by the California Health and Safety Code Division 26, Part 3, Sections 40000 and 40001, to adopt and enforce rules and regulations to attain and maintain state and federal ambient air quality standards.

3. CLARITY: The amendments to Rule 2 are wr itten so that they can be easily understood by the persons directly affected by them.

4. CONSISTENCY: The amendments to Rule 2 ar e in harmony with, and not in conflict with or contradictory to, existing statutes, court decisions, or state or federal regulations.

5. NONDUPLICATION: Amended Rule 2 does not impose the same requirements as an existing state or federal regulation.

6. REFERENCE: California Health and Safety Code Division 26, Part 3, Sections 40000 and

40001 are the sections of state law that will be implemented by the adoption of amendments

to Rule 2.

7. CEQA Guidelines: The adoption of amendments to Rule 2 is categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) under Section 15061, paragraph (b)(3).
----

|   | 1. | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934;  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                            |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                            |   |
|   | By:    | /s/      Ross J. Prossner                       |   |
|   |   | Ross      J. Prossner                           |   |
|   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer      |   |
|   |   |                                            |   |
|   | By:    | /s/      Lisa M. Jones                          |   |
|   |   | Lisa      M. Jones                              |   |
|   |   | Vice-President      and Principal Financial and |   |
|   |   | Accounting      Officer                         |   |
Exhibit 32.2


Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Security Agency Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Kuykendall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By: /s/ John D. Kuykendall
 John D. Kuykendall
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 November 14, 2010
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. for the three months ended October 31, 2007. The undersigned certify that such 10-QSB Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-QSB Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. as of October 31, 2007. This Certification is executed as of November 30, 2007 By:     /s/ Toni A. Eldred.                                              
----------------------------------------- 
Toni A. Eldred 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) By:     /s/ Toni A. Eldred.                                              
----------------------------------------- 
Toni A. Eldred
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 250 (Monday, December 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 79559-79560]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31087]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8578]

Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Mir[oacute]: The Experience of Seeing''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Mir[oacute]: The Experience of Seeing,'' 
imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, 
are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Seattle Art 
Museum, Seattle, WA, from on or about February 13, 2014, until on or 
about May 18, 2014, the Nasher Museum of Art at Duke University, from 
on or about August 28, 2014, until on or about February 22, 2015, the 
Denver Art Museum, from on or about March 22, 2015, until on or about 
June 28, 2015, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to 
be determined, is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public 
Notice of these Determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of

[[Page 79560]]

State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: December 18, 2013.
Evan M. Ryan,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-31087 Filed 12-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
EX-10.13



 Exhibit 10.13 
  





 
 Kim Seth 
 Dear Kim; 

Your new salary for 2014 is $300,000 effective as of April 16, 2014. 

Your new 2014 bonus eligibility is 35%. 
 We look forward to your
contributions in 2014 and value you as a member of the EPIRUS team. 
 Sincerely, 
  


	
	 /s/ Amit Munshi

	Amit Munshi
	Chief Executive Officer
Featured           ‘Frankenstein design’ enables 3D printed neutron collimator          

Featured           Metal steam turbine blade shows cutting-edge potential for critical, large 3D-printed parts         

Featured           Four scientists receive Battelle Distinguished Inventor recognition         

# Manufacturing Demonstration Facility

### Contact

RyanR Dehoff

dehoffrr@ornl.gov

##  

## Revitalizing US Manufacturing 

 

The Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF), established in 2012, is one of the Department of Energy’s designated user facilities focused on performing early-stage research and development to improve the energy and material efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness of American manufacturers. Research focuses on manufacturing analysis and simulation, composites and polymer systems, metal powder systems, metrology and characterization, machine tooling, large-scale metal systems, and robotics and automation.

The MDF is a 110,000 sq. ft. facility housing integrated capabilities that drive the development of new materials, software, and systems for advanced manufacturing. From binder jetting to 3D tomography to in situ monitoring, the MDF leverages a range of equipment and expertise focused on reducing the carbon footprint of the manufacturing sector, efficiently utilizing abundant and available domestic energy resources, and supporting the production of clean energy products that boost the nation’s economy.

Across its energy science and technology user facilities, ORNL delivers breakthroughs from generation to distribution and storage to end use, accelerating America’s transformation to a clean, efficient, flexible, and secure energy future.

Virtual Tour
Work With Us

ORNL Advanced Manufacturing Program 

DOE Advanced Materials & Manufacturing Technologies Office

## Focus Areas

View a hi-res version of this image

### Materials

Developing metallic alloys and polymers designed for additive manufacturing, creating hybrid materials, and understanding the role of feedstocks.

View a hi-res version of this image

### Software & Metrology

Implementing physics-based simulations, 3D tomography, machine learning, data analysis and deploying rapid qualification tools.

View a hi-res version of this image

### Systems

Developing pick and place hybrid systems and optimizing advanced materials.

## Manufacturing History and Vision

#### 

#### 

####
[No. 24533.

Department One.

November 23, 1933.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. A. H. Lyon, *Respondent.**1*

*Chas. W. Greenough*and *Carl P. Lang,*for appellant.

*Orville W. Duell*and *Gleeson & Gleeson,*for respondent.

1

Reported in 27 P. (2d) 131.

Steinert, J.

Defendant was charged in each of three counts of an information with the crime of “failure to report sales of liquid fuel,” and in a fourth count with the crime of “failure to pay excise tax on sales of liquid fuel.” A demurrer to each count of the information was sustained. The state having elected to stand on the information, judgment of dismissal was entered, from which the state has appealed.

The information alleged that respondent was the manager and principal officer of Consumers Mutual Oil Company, a domestic corporation and a distributor of liquid fuel, and that, as such officer, he had wilfully and unlawfully failed to prepare and render to the *200director of licenses of the state a sworn statement of the number of gallons of liquid fuel sold by the company during certain months; further, that, as such officer, he had wilfully and unlawfully failed to pay to the state treasurer the excise tax due the state on liquid fuel sold by the company on and prior to a certain date.

Rem. Rev. Stat., § 8330, provides that every distributor of liquid fuel shall render to the director of licenses, on or before the fifteenth day of each month, on forms prescribed, prepared and furnished by the director, a statement of the number of gallons of liquid fuel sold by it, him or them, during the preceding' calendar month, “which statement shall be sworn to by one of the principal officers in case of a domestic corporation.” Rem. Rev. Stat., § 8338, provides that any distributor, association of persons, firm or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of the act containing the above sections shall be guilty of a gross misdemeanor.

It is not alleged in the information that the respondent was himself a distributor, but merely that he was an officer of a distributor.

Obviously, the statute imposes certain duties upon distributors of liquid fuel, not upon their officers or employees. With reference to the required monthly statement, the gist of the offense is not the failure of an officer of a corporation to swear to such statement, but the failure of the distributor to render a statement properly sworn to. With reference to the payment of the tax, the offense is not the failure of the officer to pay it, but the failure of the distributor to pay it. The duties and obligations created by the statute are upon the distributor, and the offense arising from the failure to comply with the statute is, likewise, the offense of the distributor.

*201The procedure for criminal actions against corpora^ tions is outlined in Rem. Rev. Stat., §§ 2011-1 to 2011-1, inclusive. If, in this instance, any offense was committed, it was committed by tbe corporation distributor, not by tbe respondent, its officer.

Tbe judgment of dismissal is affirmed.

Beals, C. J., Main, Mitchell, and Millard, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Denison Mines Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2012, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and SEC Rule 13a-14(b), that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 15, 2013



|                               |  |                    |  |                          |  |     |  |                     
|------------------------------ |  | ------------------ |  | ------------------------ |  | --- |  | --------------------
|By:                            |  | /s/ David D. Cates |  |                          |  | By: |  | /s/ Ron F. Hochstein
|Name: David D. Cates           |  |                    |  | Name: Ron F. Hochstein  
|Title: VP Finance, Tax and CFO |  |                    |  | Title: President and CEO
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

Filed: November 19, 2019

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

RAFAEL D. LEAL, * No. 17-1513V

 *

Petitioner, * Special Master Sanders

 *

v. *

 *

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; Dismissal; Influenza (“Flu”) 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Vaccine; Tetanus, Diphtheria, and 

 * Pertussis (“Tdap”) Vaccine; SIRVA

 Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

ORDER CONCLUDING PROCEEDINGS1

On October 13, 2017, Rafael D. Leal (“Petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation 

pursuant to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program.2 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 

(2012). Petitioner received a flu vaccination in his left arm and a Tdap vaccination in his right 

arm on February 29, 2016. Pet’r’s Ex. 4 at 4, ECF No. 22. Petitioner alleged that he developed a 

shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) in his left arm caused by the flu 

vaccine and in his right arm caused by the Tdap vaccine. See Pet. at 1, ECF No. 1. Petitioner 

further alleged that he experienced the residual effects of his injury for more than six months. Id.

On November 1, 2019, the parties filed a joint stipulation in which they state that this action 

should be dismissed. Stip. at 2. Prior to filing the stipulation, Petitioner notified his counsel that 

he wished to withdraw from the Program and that he does not wish to pursue a separate legal 

action. Id. The parties then agreed to dismiss this action pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a). Id. 

Accordingly, pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a) the above-captioned case is hereby dismissed 

 1 This decision shall be posted on the website of the United States Court of Federal Claims, in 

accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, § 205, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 

(codified as amended at 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012)). This means the Decision will be 

available to anyone with access to the Internet. As provided by Vaccine Rule 18(b), each party 

has 14 days within which to request redaction “of any information furnished by that party: (1) that 

is a trade secret or commercial or financial in substance and is privileged or confidential; or (2) 

that includes medical files or similar files, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 

unwarranted invasion of privacy.” Vaccine Rule 18(b).

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755.
2

without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed that a judgment shall not enter in the 

instant case pursuant to Vaccine Rule 21(a).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Herbrina D. Sanders

Herbrina D. Sanders

Special Master
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 96-40498 Summary Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v. ISAUL SALINAS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-95-CR-163-02

_________________________________________________________________ April 11, 1997 Before KING, JOLLY, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Isaul Salinas Jr., appeals his convictions for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute approximately seven kilograms of cocaine and attempted possession with intent to distribute approximately seven kilograms of cocaine. Salinas argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. He also contends, for the first time on appeal, that the district judge’s questioning of him deprived him of a fair trial. Our2

review of the record and the arguments and authorities convinces us that no reversible error was committed. The evidence was sufficient for a reasonable jury to find Salinas guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See United States v. Alix , 86 F.3d 429, 435-36 (5th Cir. 1996). Nor did the district judge plainly err by questioning Salinas during trial. See United States v. Mizell , 88 F.3d 288, 296-97 (5th Cir. 1996). AFFIRMED.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24018]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 430 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-15, K2025-15.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24018 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A24A0453. CARA WILLIAMS v. THE STATE. 

In 2019, a jury found Cara Williams guilty of multiple counts of forgery in the

second degree, financial transaction card theft, aggravated identity fraud, and making

false statements. Following the trial court’s denial of her motions for out-of-time

appeals, Williams appealed to this Court. We vacated the trial court’s order and

directed the court to enter a new order dismissing the motions. Williams v. State, Case

No. A22A0404 (decided May 6, 2022). Williams later filed an extraordinary motion

for new trial and demand for evidentiary hearing, which the trial court dismissed. She

then filed this direct appeal, but we lack jurisdiction.

Pretermitting whetherthe court’s orderwasinterlocutory because motions were

still pending in the court below when Williams filed her notice of appeal, OCGA §

5-6-35 (a) (7) requires a discretionary application to appeal from the denial of an

extraordinary motion for new trial. See Balkcom v. State, 227 Ga. App. 327, 331-332

(489 SE2d 129) (1997). “The requirements of OCGA § 5-6-35 are jurisdictional and

this court cannot accept an appeal not made in compliance therewith.” Boyle v. State,

190 Ga. App. 734, 734 (380 SE2d 57) (1989). Williams’sfailure to file an application

December 11, 2023
for a discretionary appeal deprives us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is

hereby DISMISSED. 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

12/11/2023