alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011296EN.01001401.xml

| 15.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 296/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 296/14

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1154/2011

of 10 November 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Zgornjesavinjski želodec (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Zgornjesavinjski želodec’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Zgornjesavinjski želodec’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 45, 12.2.2011, p. 28.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

SLOVENIA

Zgornjesavinjski želodec (PGI)

---
EXHIBIT 32

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Aviation General,
Incorporated  and  Subsidiaries.  (the  "Company")  for  the  fiscal  year ended
December  31,  2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date  hereof  (the "Report"), the undersigned President and Principal Accounting
and  Financial Officer of the Company each hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     1.  The  Report  fully  complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the
Company.

Dated:  March  25,  2004


                                       /s/Wirt  D.  Walker  III
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Wirt  D.  Walker  III
                                       Director,  Chairman  of  the  Board,
                                         and  Chief  Executive  Officer,
                                         President  and  Treasurer

                                       /s/Glenn  A.  Jackson
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Glenn  A.  Jackson
                                         Chief  Financial  Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)
 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BCT Pharmacy Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.
 
 Dated: March 9, 2011By:
/s/ Hui Tian TangHui Tian TangChief Executive Officer and Chairman
 
 Dated: March 9, 2011By:
/s/ Xiaoyan ZhangXiaoyan ZhangChief Financial Officer
Page 1 of 3

Disposition Comments

Docket No: FAA-2013-0146 These comments are in

Directorate ID: 2012-SW-060-AD response to an SNPRM

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

Next Step: FRAN SNPRM

 No Comments/Only Supportive Comments Received – If this box is checked, no signatures are 

required.

No Has the referenced service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? If yes, 

list latest revision and attach a copy. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously 

published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance.

Instructions: Summarize all comments by issue (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of 

each issue. All comments relating to the same issue should be discussed together. Do not list all of the issues 

from one commenter together. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and 

describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA-IR-M-8040.1C Chapter 9.

ISSUE 1: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD: 

If NO, we don’t agree because 

ISSUE 2: Select one of the following: 

If other, explain: 

Commenter(s): 

What change to the AD action is requested? 

Why is the change requested or how is it justified? 

Do we agree? 

If YES, we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: 

If PARTIALLY AGREE, we agree with because We disagree with because 

Make the following changes to the AD:
Page 2 of 3

If NO, we don’t agree because 

For additional issues, double-click here
Page 3 of 3

Signature Section

Signature indicates concurrence with this action.

Originating Office Tracking No.: 

ASE Printed Name: Date

Branch Manager Date
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing VII, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maurice C. Werdegar, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Maurice C. Werdegar


Maurice C. Werdegar


President and Chief Executive Officer


March 15, 2016
United States Department of State

 Bureau of Oceans and International 

 Environmental and Scientific Affairs

 Washington, D.C. 20520

January 31, 2012

Mr. Marco Gonzalez

Executive Secretary

Ozone Secretariat

United Nations Environment Programme

United Nations Avenue

P.O. Box 30552

Nairobi, Kenya

Dear Mr. Gonzalez:

Consistent with provisions of the Montreal Protocol and of Decision IX/6 of the Parties, the United States 

submits the enclosed nomination for a methyl bromide critical use exemption (CUE) in 2014. This nomination is 

intended for consideration by the Parties to the Protocol at their Twenty Fourth meeting in 2012. The enclosed 

document includes separate chapters that describe each of the four sectors for which the United States is making a 

nomination: California strawberries, commodities, food processing plants, and dry cured pork products. We hope that 

this organization provides the information in the most accessible manner to facilitate the efforts of the Methyl Bromide 

Technical Options Committee (MBTOC) during their review.

The U.S. Government is continuing to collect additional information on issues relevant to our CUE nominations, 

particularly on the emergence of pests in some areas. We will continue to evaluate our CUE need based on the most 

current data we have available. We also wish to ensure MBTOC is aware that tolerances related to sulfuryl fluoride are 

under consideration in the United States, and we are keeping that under close review as that process moves forward. 

Consistent with past practice, the U.S. critical use nomination is based on available alternatives that are viable at the 

time of the nomination. 

We appreciate your consideration of this application, and look forward to working with you and others to 

answer any questions that may arise during the review process. Best regards.

Sincerely,

John Thompson

Deputy Director

Office of Environmental Policy
From: "King, Heidi R." <Heidi_R._King@omb.eop.gov>

To: Lydia Wegman/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Cc: Deirdre Murphy/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Karen Martin/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/18/2011 10:38 AM

Subject: RE: Checking in on the CO NAAQS

Good morning Lydia, Deirdre and Karen,

I hope the recent weather challenges have not caused you or your families too much inconvenience, and 

that you are all well.

Thanks for your note this morning; I had requested that interagency comments be submitted by Friday, 

and at least one agency did not submit until this morning. I expect to send them to you later today. As 

you likely anticipated, the comments are not lengthy.

Would you like to set aside time Wednesday (anytime after 2pm) to discuss the comments that I will 

send later today?

Thanks,

Heidi
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 2-10-151-CR

SADIQ OLASUNKA ADELEKE APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

------------

FROM THE 297TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

------------

MEMORANDUM OPINION

1

------------

On December 11, 2008, the trial court denied Appellant Sadiq Olasunka

Adeleke’s request for forensic DNA testing. Adeleke’s notice of appeal was due by

January 12, 2009, but was not filed until April 7, 2010.

2 See Tex. R. App. P.

26.2(a)(1). Also on April 7, 2010, Adeleke filed a motion for leave to file an

out-of-time notice of appeal.

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

2 Adeleke filed the notice of appeal pro se.
On April 28, 2010, we notified Adeleke of our concern that we lacked

jurisdiction over this appeal due to its untimeliness and informed him that we would

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction unless he or any party desiring to continue

the appeal filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex.

R. App. P. 44.3. Adeleke responded to our jurisdictional letter, but the response

does not show grounds for continuing the appeal.

A notice of appeal that complies with the requirements of rule 26 is essential

to vest this court with jurisdiction. Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex. Crim.

App. 1998). The court of criminal appeals has expressly held that, without a timely

filed notice of appeal or motion for extension of time, we cannot exercise jurisdiction

over an appeal. See Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996);

see also Slaton, 981 S.W.2d at 210.

Because Adeleke’s notice of appeal was untimely, we have no basis for

jurisdiction over the appeal. Accordingly, we deny all pending motions and dismiss

the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: June 10, 2010

2
Exhibit 12.1

Great Lakes REIT Ratio of Earnings to  Fixed Charges and Preferred Share Dividends  (Dollars In thousands)

|                                                                           |  |   |        | Years ended December 31, |   |       
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------ | ------------------------ | - | ------
|
|Income before discontinued operations and allocation to minority interests |  | $ | 11,496 |                          | $ | 17,368
|Interest expense                                                           |  |   | 17,645 |                          |   | 15,502
|Amortization of deferred financing costs                                   |  |   | 614    |                          |   | 1,100 
|                                                                           |  |   |        |                          |   |       
|Adjusted income                                                            |  | $ | 29,755 |                          | $ | 33,970
|                                                                           |  |   |        |                          |   |       
|Fixed charges                                                              |  | $ | 18,259 |                          | $ | 16,602
|Preferred share dividends                                                  |  |   | 3,656  |                          |   | 3,656 
|                                                                           |  |   |        |                          |   |       
|Adjusted charges                                                           |  | $ | 21,915 |                          | $ | 20,258
|                                                                           |  |   |        |                          |   |       
|Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred share dividends           |  |   | 1.36   |                          |   | 1.68  
|                                                                           |  |   |        |                          |   |       

---

QuickLinks
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, April 07, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, April 07, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16A1229. IN THE INTEREST OF: A. D. G., A CHILD.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion is hereby GRANTED.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Transit Administration

# AGENCY:

Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Department of Transportation (DOT).

# ACTION:

Notice of safety advisory.

# SUMMARY:

The Federal Transit Administration (FTA) is issuing Safety Advisory 24-1 to alert transit agencies that Phoenix Motorcars (Phoenix) is voluntarily recalling certain 2020-2021 800V Catalyst and 2020-2022 ZX5 transit buses. FTA is recommending corrective actions to avoid and mitigate the risk to public transportation posed by the safety defect. The FTA's Safety Advisory 24-1, “Proterra Bus/Phoenix Motorcars Safety Recall,” is available in its entirety on the agency's public website. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) recall number is 24V-655.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Philip Herbert, Senior Accident Investigator for Transit Safety and Oversight, telephone (202) 366-5451 or                         *Philip.Herbert@dot.gov.*

*Authority:*49 U.S.C. 5329; 49 CFR 1.91 and 670.29.                    

Veronica Vanterpool,

Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2024-23865 Filed 10-15-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-57-P
#### In the Matter of Jose Rosario, Petitioner, v Donald Selsky, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, et al., Respondents.

[772 NYS2d 885]

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner was found guilty of two counts each of drug possession and smuggling as charged in two separate misbehavior reports.* The first misbehavior report relates that while a correction officer was conducting a strip search of petitioner, petitioner was ordered to spit out what appeared to be a green object in his mouth. When petitioner failed to comply, a correction sergeant was called and ordered the strip search to continue. As the strip search continued, a green balloon containing small envelopes fell to the floor. The sergeant confiscated the balloon and placed it in a plastic feed-up glove. The substance then was turned over for testing, resulting in a positive result for heroin, at which point it was labeled and placed in an evidence locker. According to the second misbehavior report, petitioner was then escorted to the facility drug watch room where the strip search resumed. Another correction officer, who conducted this portion of the strip search, discovered a balloon secreted in petitioner’s anus. The contents of the balloon later tested positive for marihuana, after which it was labeled and placed in an evidence locker.

*897We are unpersuaded by petitioner’s assertion that proper procedures were not followed with respect to the confiscated contraband. Contrary to petitioner’s assertion, the record establishes that in both instances the contraband was secured by the respective correction officer for a brief period in order to facilitate immediate testing pursuant to 7 NYCRR 1010.4 and an unbroken chain of custody was documented (see *Matter of Matos v*Goord, 300 AD2d 970 [2002], *lv denied*99 NY2d 509 [2003]; *Matter of Davis v Coughlin,*210 AD2d 842, 842 [1994]). We also reject petitioner’s assertion that the lack of endorsement by the sergeant, who was present for a portion of each incident, renders the misbehavior report defective. Petitioner has established no prejudice resulting from any alleged deficiency inasmuch as the sergeant signed both misbehavior reports as the area supervisor and testified at the hearing (see *Matter of Torres v Rasy,*275 AD2d 851, 852 [2000]; *Matter of Huntley v Goord,*261 AD2d 401, 401-402 [1999]) and, therefore, any error due to a lack of endorsement is harmless. In view of the foregoing, the misbehavior report, positive drug test results and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence of petitioner’s guilt *(see Matter of Matos v Goord, supra*at 970).

Mercure, J.P., Spain, Rose, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

*

 Petitioner was also charged with, but found not guilty of, refusing a direct order and refusing a frisk.
TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKSPSP 605Page1 of 2Jul 08/2013TR5−158TEMPORARY REVISION NO.5−158INSERT IN SECTION 5−10−30FACING PAGE 54REASON FOR ISSUE:To introduce a new Chapter 5 task 57-40-00-186* (Inboard Flap − Hinge Box Forward Lugs).ACTION:Add the following task 57-40-00-186* to the list of Chapter 57 checks:NOTE:Recordthe incorporation of this Temporary Revision on the yellow RECORD OF TEMPORARY REVISIONSand the LIST OF EFFECTIVE TEMPORARY REVISIONS sheets at the front of this publication.TIME LIMITS/MAINTENANCE CHECKSPSP 605Page2 of 2Jul 08/2013TR5−158MAINTENANCEMANUAL − CH. 5REFERENCEZONEACCESSCHECKINTERVALCHAPTER 57 CHECKSDESCRIPTION57−40−00−186*Inboard Flap − Hinge Box Forward Lugs.NDT Check. 7900 T(Ref. PSP 612, Part 6, ET−57−40−10, Part A) LANDINGS7100 RLANDINGSSee NOTEPHASE-IN:For aircraft with more than 7400 Landings but notmore than 14850 Landings at the date of thisTemporary Revision, do this check within 500Landings but not later than 15100 Landings.For aircraft with more than 14850 Landings at thedate of this Temporary Revision, do this checkwithin the next 250 Landings.572672571−CB−FB572−DB−GB671−CB−FB672−DB−FB
Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of August Technology Corporation (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



|Date: February 26, 2003 |  | /s/JEFF L. O'DELLJeff L. O'Dell
Chief Executive Officer                                       
|----------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | /s/SCOTT A. GABBARDScott A. Gabbard
Acting Chief Financial Officer and
Vice President, Finance

---

QuickLinks