alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NUMBER 13-14-00665-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE ASHLEY LEEANN GARCIA A/K/A ASHLEY LEEANN HARDIN

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Longoria

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam1

Relator, Ashley Leeann Garcia a/k/a Ashley Leeann Hardin, filed a petition for writ 

of mandamus in the above cause on November 19, 2014 through which she sought to 

compel the trial court to vacate all orders providing for legal custody, physical custody, or 

visitation with respect to A.L.G., a minor child. The Court requested and received a 

response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real party in interest, Patrick Robert 

Garcia, and further received a reply thereto from relator. 

 

1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not 

required to do so.”); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).
2

To be entitled to the extraordinary relief of a writ of mandamus, the relator must 

show that the trial court abused its discretion and that there is no adequate remedy by 

appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. 

proceeding). The relator has the burden of establishing both prerequisites to mandamus 

relief, and this burden is a heavy one. In re CSX Corp., 124 S.W.3d 149, 151 (Tex. 2003) 

(orig. proceeding). “A trial court has no discretion in applying the law to the facts or 

determining what the law is.” In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 135. We 

assess the adequacy of an appellate remedy by balancing the benefits of mandamus 

review against the detriments. In re State, 355 S.W.3d 611, 614–15 (Tex. 2011) (orig. 

proceeding); In re Team Rocket, L.P., 256 S.W.3d 257, 262 (Tex. 2008) (orig. 

proceeding). In performing this balancing, we look at a number of factors, including 

whether mandamus review “will spare litigants and the public ‘the time and money utterly 

wasted enduring eventual reversal of improperly conducted proceedings.’” In re State, 

355 S.W.3d at 615 (quoting In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 148 S.W.3d at 136). 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, 

the response, the reply, and the applicable law, is of the opinion that relator has not met 

her burden to obtain mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is 

DENIED. See id. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

18th day of December, 2014.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3163 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3163

 To designate the calendar decade beginning on January 1, 2001, as the 
                ``Decade of Pain Control and Research''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the calendar decade beginning on January 1, 2001, as the 
                ``Decade of Pain Control and Research''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DECADE OF PAIN CONTROL AND RESEARCH.

    The calendar decade beginning January 1, 2001, is designated as the 
``Decade of Pain Control and Research''.
                                 <all>
```
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00256-CV 

IN RE KENNETH WEBB, RELATOR 

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

 

July 31, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Relator Kenneth G. Webb, appearing pro se, seeks a writ of mandamus 

compelling the Honorable William D. Smith, presiding judge of the 84th District Court of 

Hansford County, to rule on “all motions that have been filed in case #CV 04982 since” 

March 19, 2009. According to relator’s petition, the underlying case is a probate 

proceeding. 

Mandamus relief is an extraordinary remedy. In re Southwestern Bell Telephone 

Co., L.P., 235 S.W.3d 619, 623 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding). To be entitled to relief 

by mandamus, the relator must show the trial court clearly abused its discretion, and 

that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 

714, 718 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840-44 
2

(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The burden to demonstrate entitlement to mandamus 

relief is on the relator. See Walker, 827 S.W.2d at 837. This includes providing an 

adequate record to substantiate the allegations contained in the petition for writ of 

mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.7; Dallas Morning News v. Fifth Court of Appeals,

842 S.W.2d 655, 658 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding).

We will deny relator’s petition. The petition does not comply with the form and 

contents requirements for a petition in an original proceeding, as specified by the rules 

governing such proceedings. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3 (setting out required contents of 

petition). Most significantly, the petition is not accompanied by an appendix or record. 

Nothing relator has submitted substantiates the allegations contained in his petition. 

See also TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(j) (requiring person filing petition to certify that factual 

statements in petition are supported by “competent evidence included in the appendix 

or record”). Without an adequate record, relator is wholly unable to prove that Judge 

Smith has abused his discretion if indeed he has not ruled on all pending motions. 

Because relator has thus failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial 

court, his petition for writ of mandamus must be, and is, denied.

James T. Campbell

 Justice
Exhibit 10.1





HARRIS & GILLESPIE CPA’S, PLLC

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANT’S

3901 STONE WAY N., SUITE 202

SEATTLE, WA  98103

206.547.6050




August 19, 2014




United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Mail Stop 11-3

450 Fifth Street, N.W.

Washington D.C. 20549




Re:  Overtech Corp.




Dear Sirs/Madams:




The undersigned Harris & Gillespie CPA’s, PLLC  previously acted as independent accountants to audit the financial statements of Overtech Corp. We are no longer acting as independent accountants to the Company.




This letter will confirm that we have read Overtech Corp’s statements included under Item 4 of its Form 8-K, and we agree with such statements as they relate to us.




We hereby consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the foregoing report on Form 8-K.




Very truly,







/S/ HARIS & GILLESPIE CPA’S, PLLC
EXHIBIT 31.2 Certification of 
Principal Financial Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Toni a. Eldred, Chief Financial Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.     The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 12, 2007 /s/ Toni A. EldredToni A. Eldred 
Principal Financial Officer
Iltcorportlt;olJ by Re/erellce 

Docket No. FAA~2009~/212; Directorate Idelllifier 2008~NM~/6 ~AD: AmendllleIl139~/6 32: AD 011-JJ~09 

Airbus A330 Airbus A330 ALS. Part 3 - Certification Maintenance 

Requirements 

Revision 3 07/2912010 

Dockel No. FAA 1010-05.j6: DireclOrafe Identifier 1009-NM~215~AD; Amcndmell! 39-16659; AD 2011-08-09 

EMBRAER Subject 28·41-00. Fuel Quantity Indicating System. of Revision 27 0912812010 

Chapter 28. Fuel. of the EMBRAER EMB120 Brasitia 

AMM. MM-12011459 

EMBRAER Subject 28-42-00. Fuel Quantity Measuring Sticks Revision 27 0912812010 

Assembly - Description and Operation. of Chapter 28. 

Fuel. of the EMBRAER EMB120 Brasilia AMM. MM· 

12011459 

EMBRAER Task 28·25. Operational Check Fuel Quantity Indicating Revision 26 0110512010 

System (Measuring Slicks), specified in Section 3. 

Systems and Powerplant Inspection Requirements. in 

EMBRAER EMB 120 Models Maintenance Review Board 

Report (MRBRl. MRB-HI-2oo 

Docket No. FAA-2010~0802; Direcforate Identifier 2009-NM~256-AD: Amelldmellt 39-16733: AD 10/ ~J3-JO 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 40-7H12 0211312007 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 40-71-04 1210712009 

Bombardier Service Bulletin 45-71-5 0211312007 

.. '. -" , ..•. 't.. , ... .. • 07I2C" !l 

Docket No. FAA~201 1-0036: Directorate Idel/tifier 2UIO-NM-230-AD: Amelldmellt 39~/6729: AD 201 1-13~06 

Bombardier, Inc. 

Bombardier, Inc. 

Bombardier. Inc. 

Bombardier, Inc. 

Bombardier, Inc. 

Bombardier, Inc. 

Service Bulletin 84-28·03 

Service Bulletin 64-28·04 

Service Bulletin 84-28·05 

Service Bulletin 84-28-07 

Service Bulletin 84·57-09 

Task 284000-417 in Section 4-1 . Fuel System 

Limitations, of Part - Airworthiness Limitation Items, 

Bombardier 0400 Dash 8 Maintenance Requirements 

Manual, PSM 1-84-7 

Revision C 0511512009 

Revision B 1012112009 

0612812006 

0810 112008 

Revision B 0910312008 

Revision 5 0412 112010 

Docket No. FAA~2 011~OI26: Directorate Idelllifier 2011-NE-03-AD: Amendmenl 39-16726: AD 2011-13-0J 

Hartzell Engine Technologies, LLC Service Bulletin No. 040 Revision A 1212212010 

l'rilffe(1 612}1](1/ f PtlKe I (If]
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Prosperous Clean Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Wei Wang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 12, 2010

/s/ Wei WangWei Wang

Chief Executive Officer
Order entered October 31, 2018

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01071

- CR

ALFREDO SERRATO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 292nd Ju dicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17

- 31349

- V



### O RDER

Before the Court is appellant’s October 29, 2018 motion to extend the time to file his

brief. We GRANT the motion to the extent appellant’s brief shall be due THIRTY DAYS from

the date of this order.

/s/ CRAIG STODDART

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO §906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the filing of the Annual Report on Form 10-K of CVR Refining, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the "Partnership"), for the year ended
December 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned officers of CVR Refining GP, LLC, the general
partner of the Partnership, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officer's
knowledge:



Date: March 14, 2013

By:

/s/ JOHN J. LIPINSKI John J. Lipinski
Chief Executive Officer
of CVR Refining GP, LLC,
the general partner of CVR Refining, LPBy:

/s/ SUSAN M. BALL Susan M. Ball
Chief Financial Officer
of CVR Refining GP, LLC,
the general partner of CVR Refining, LP


---



QuickLinks
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

 

Consentof Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

TheBoard of Directors

AugustTechnology Corporation:

We consent to the incorporation by reference inthe registration statement (No. 333-45848, 333-45850, 333-67248, 333-113498,333-118366) on Form S-8 of August Technology Corporation of our reports datedMarch 7, 2005, except as to Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements,which is as of November 8, 2005, with respect to the consolidated balancesheets of August Technology Corporation as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, andthe related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity andcash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,2004, and the related financial statement schedule, and our report dated March7, 2005, except as to the second through final paragraphs of  Management’s Report on Internal Control overFinancial Reporting (as Restated), which are as of November 8**,** 2005, on management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2004 and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004, which reports appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of AugustTechnology Corporation filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Our report on Internal Control over FinancialReporting expresses our opinion that August Technology Corporation did notmaintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,2004 because of the effect of a material weakness on the achievement of theobjectives of the control criteria and contains an explanatory paragraph thatstate that management has identified and included in its revised assessment thefollowing material weakness as of December 31, 2004: August TechnologyCorporation did not have effective policies and procedures, or personnel withsufficient technical knowledge of revenue recognition principles, to ensure that multi-element arrangements andrelated software revenue components were accounted for in accordance withgenerally accepted accounting principles. Specifically, August Technology Corporation’s policies andprocedures did not provide for sufficient identification of contract terms, orconcurrent transactions, that impact the timing of revenue recognition.

 

/s/KPMG LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

November9, 2005

 

** **

 

 

----
Federal Employee Insurance Beneÿts Overview INSURANCE 

Federal Employees Health Beneÿts (FEHB) Program 

Unexpected accidents and illnesses can be expensive. Even routine doctor visits and prescriptions can add 

up. With FEHB, you have 15 or more health plan choices. Each plan provides comprehensive coverage for 

you, your spouse, and your children under age 26. It’s competitive; your agency contributes to 

the premium.  ̃ere are no waiting periods and no restrictions on pre-existing conditions. 

Cheers to health! 

Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP) 

If you want more dental coverage than what your health plan o°ers, FEDVIP’s comprehensive dental 

insurance can cover you, your spouse, and your unmarried dependent children 

under age 22 for cleanings, x-rays, cavities, orthodontics, and more. With 10 dental plans to choose 

from, it’s easy to keep your family smiling. 

Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP) 

If you want more vision coverage than what your health plan o°ers, FEDVIP’s comprehensive vision 

insurance can cover you, your spouse, and your unmarried dependent children under age 22 for eye 

exams, glasses, contact lenses, and discounts on laser eye surgery. With 4 vision 

plans to choose from and premiums starting around $3 biweekly, you're looking well. 

Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance Program (FEGLI) 

With FEGLI, your family is protected from burdensome funeral costs and catastrophic income loss if you 

die unexpectedly. You can get coverage from as little as one year’s salary to more than 

six years’ salary and many options in between. You can also get coverage for your spouse and eligible 

children. Now that’s peace of mind you can live with. 

Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP) 

If you cannot perform everyday tasks such as eating, dressing, and bathing because of a chronic illness, injury, 

disability, or aging, long term care insurance can help you pay for the assistance you need. With FLTCIP, you 

and your eligible family members can be protected from this ÿnancial burden that can cost an 

average of $32,000 to $91,000 a year. 

Federal Flexible Spending Account Program (FSAFEDS) 

More than 420,000 Feds use pre-tax dollars to save on their health and dependent care expenses. It’s like a 

30% discount for what your family spends on prescriptions, doctor visits, glasses, 

orthodontics, and other health expenses. It’s also like a 30% discount on daycare 

expenses for your children under age 13 and on daycare for your adult dependents. When you’re in 

FSAFEDS, you’re in the money. 

MORE INFO: www.opm.gov/insure 

For complete information, including terms and conditions, please visit www.opm.gov/insure. 

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Richard A. Karp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Catapult Communications Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Catapult Communications
Corporation.

                                        By: /S/ RICHARD A. KARP

                                        Name: Richard A. Karp
                                        Title:Chief Executive Officer


I, Christopher A. Stephenson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Catapult Communications Corporation on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended September 30, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information
contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material
respects the financial condition and results of operations of Catapult
Communications Corporation.

                                        By: /S/ CHRISTOPHER A. STEPHENSON

                                        Name: Christopher A. Stephenson
                                        Title:Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Sterling Oiland Gas Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Timothy Barritt, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 2nd day of
July, 2009.





TIMOTHY
      BARRITTTimothy
      BarrittPresident
      and Chief Executive Officer