alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           5,692
<SECURITIES>                                   182,636
<RECEIVABLES>                                  121,588
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,208
<INVENTORY>                                      1,761
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               317,119
<PP&E>                                         249,969
<DEPRECIATION>                                (21,368)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 548,835
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          100,974
<BONDS>                                        347,502
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           333
<OTHER-SE>                                      95,697
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   548,835
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               192,623
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  115,676
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 6,010
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              27,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,621)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,080)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,541)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,541)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
DOT - c sr- a C) o I -10L-±^^. 

1 

SIO- I l()6()i-{l2 2 

James L. Oberstar i ^ i. r i 

Member of Congress 

8th District. Minnesota *'H40t^ ff\ ^€^^f 

(1975-2011) ^ ^ ^ '
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6185

DARRYL GREEN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus PATRICK CONROY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA02-92-DKC) Submitted: April 18, 2002 Decided: April 30, 2002 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darryl Green, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Darryl Green appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 2001) complaint and dismissing without prejudice the complaint insofar as if could be construed as having been filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s memorandum and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Green v. Conroy , No. CA-02-92-DKC (D. Md. Jan. 17, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                 Exhibit 10.28


                                 AMENDMENT NO. 1

                                       TO

                            PRODUCT SUPPLY AGREEMENT

     This Amendment No. 1 is effective 1 March 2000 by and between AIR PRODUCTS
AND CHEMICALS, INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Delaware (hereinafter called "Seller"), and CLARK REFINING & MARKETING,
INC., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of
Delaware (hereinafter called "Buyer").

                                WITNESSETH THAT:

     WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer are parties to a Product Supply Agreement dated
as of 1 August 1999 (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement"); and

     WHEREAS, the parties now wish to further amend the Agreement as set forth
herein.

     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the terms and
conditions set forth herein, Seller and Buyer agree to amend the Agreement as
follows:

1.   In Section 4.1.9 Density Determination, delete the first sentence in this
     section in its entirety and replace with the following sentence: "The
     flowing gas-density of the refinery fuel gas stream shall be determined
     using an on-line gas chromatograph."

2.   Delete Section 4.1.15 Calibration of Gas Densitometer in its entirety.

3.   In Appendix I, delete in its entirety the paragraph beginning "LHVrf and
     HHVrf shall be as calculated..." and replace it with the following:

"LHVrf and HHVrf shall be calculated monthly by Seller based on averaging
Seller's gas chromatograph-based determination of the refinery fuel heating
values. LHVng and HHVng shall be the monthly average values of each as
provided by the supplier(s) of natural gas. The quantity of BTU's purchased by
Seller from Buyer shall be determined by Seller's metering and chromatograph
on a BTU/month, HHV basis."

4.   All defined terms set forth herein without definition shall have the
     meaning given such term in the Agreement.

5.   Except as set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the
     Agreement shall remain unchanged and continue in full force and effect.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, parties hereto have caused this Amendment No. 1 to be
executed by their duly authorized officers as of the date first written above.

                                  AIR PRODUCTS AND CHEMICALS, INC.


                                  By:      /s/ John E. McGlade
                                         -------------------------------------
                                  Title:   Vice President
                                         -------------------------------------


                                  CLARK REFINING & MARKETING, INC.


                                  By:    /s/ Ken Isom
                                         -------------------------------------
                                  Title:   Technical Manager
                                         -------------------------------------
#### T. J. Underwood, Appellee, v. Lombard Invest*me*nt Company, Appellant.

Appeal: equity cause: record: agreed statement of facts: evidence. An equity cause is not triable *de novo*in the supreme court upon an agreed statement of facts which has not been made a part of the record in the district court.

*Appeal from Page District Court.*— Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge.

Tuesday, October 27, 1891.

*26ActioN in chancery to set aside a sheriff’s sale of a town lot occupied by plaintiff as a homestead, and to-declare the plaintiff’s homestead right superior to the-defendant’s title under the sheriff’s sale. Upon a trial on the merits there was a decree granting the relief' prayed for in the plaintiff’s petition. The defendant, *appeals.*

Affirmed.

*T. F. Willis,*for appellant.

*T. It. Stockton,*for appellee.

Beck, C. J.

The abstract does not set out the evidence upon which the case was tried, and does not purport to do so; but it contains a statement of facts which was made by the defendant’s counsel, in connection with his written argument upon the trial in the court below, the cause having been submitted on trial in vacation on written arguments. It also presents an agreement between the parties entered into prior to the trial in the court below, which is in these words: “There being no material disagreement between counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the defendant as to the facts established in this case, and that we may, relieve the court from an examination of the evidence,, it is hereby agreed, for the purposes of this submission, that said facts are as stated by the defendant’s counsel and submitted in connection with his argument and brief submitted herewith, subject only to the. following modification which is added thereto, towit: ‘From the purchase of lot twenty (20), block ten (10), by plaintiff ’s wife until her death they occupied the-building on said lot as their home, and since her death plaintiff has not abandoned any right of homestead which he then had, if any, in said lot. March 20, 1890.’ ” The plaintiff filed an amended abstract, alleging and showing that the agreed statement of facts was not a part of the record in the case, and supports it by *27reference to a certificate of tlie clerk verifying Ms amended abstract in tMs regard. TMs amendment is denied by the other side, but is supported by the transcript in the case. The agreed statement of facts is not certified by the judge trying the cause, or otherwise identified and made a part of the record. Not being a part of the record in this court, it cannot be considered in the decision of the case.

II. The abstract contains no part of the evidence, but presents the case wholly upon the agreed statement of facts, which, as we have just shown, is not found in the record. The ease, in view of these conclusions, stands in the court as a chancery cause, triable' *ele novo*without any evidence which can be considered here. There are, therefore, no questions of fact or law presented for our decision. A- motion to dismiss the appeal need not be considered. The judgment of the district court must be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the report of Prospect Medical Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period
ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Mike Heather, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



December 26, 2008

/s/ MIKE HEATHER Mike Heather Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





We the undersigned, Barry J. Lucas, President (Principal Executive Officer) and Michael J. Malbourne, Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of Elray Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/Barry J. Lucas

Barry J. Lucas

President (Principal Executive Officer)



/s/Michael J. Malbourne

Michael J. Malbourne 
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)



November 18, 2008



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83908]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24138]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Technical Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics Technical Advisory Committee will 
meet on Thursday, November 7, 2024. This meeting will be held virtually 
from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EST.
    The Committee presents advice and makes recommendations to the 
Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on technical aspects of data 
collection and the formulation of economic measures and makes 
recommendations on areas of research. The BLS presents issues and then 
draws on the expertise of Committee members representing specialized 
fields within the academic disciplines of economics, statistics, data 
science, and survey design.
    The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows:

10:00 a.m. Commissioner's Welcome and Review of Agency Developments
10:30 a.m. Updating the Contingent Worker Supplement to the Current 
Population Survey
1:00 p.m. Response Rates and Data Quality Measures with Integrated Data
2:00 p.m. Household Cost Indexes: Prototype Methods and Initial Results
3:00 p.m. Measuring Productivity of Metropolitan Statistical Areas
4:00 p.m. Approximate Conclusion

    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the 
meeting should be directed to Sarah Dale, Bureau of Labor Statistics 
Technical Advisory Committee, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e2a0aeb1b6a3a1a2808e91cc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="5b1917080f1a181b393728753c342d">[email protected]</span></a>. Individuals planning 
to attend the meeting should register at https://blstac.beventbrite.com. Individuals who require special accommodations 
should contact Ms. Dale at least two days prior to the meeting date.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of October 2024.
Leslie Bennett
Chief, Division of Management Systems.
[FR Doc. 2024-24138 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 31.1




CERTIFICATIONS




I,
Pinchas Althaus, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Empire Minerals
Corp.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




(a) Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;




(b) Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and




(c) Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
November 20, 2007





/s/
      Pinchas AlthaustPinchas
      AlthaustChief
      Executive Officer and President
|                            |                                                                                                                       |
|----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1)     | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |

|                            |                                                                                                                                                                         |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2)     | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Insurance Holdings Corp. |

|                                                                                    |                        |        |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------|--------|
| By:                                                                                | /s/ Donald J Cronin    |   |
|                                                                               |                   |   |
| Donald J. CroninPresident and Chief Executive Officer(principal executive officer) | November 10, 2010 |
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J.
Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Pamela J. Montpelier                    
|--------------------------------------------
|Pamela J. Montpelier Chief Executive Officer



September 17, 2003



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IB 

Union Calendar No. 508 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3590 

[Report No. 114–657] 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 

the income threshold used in determining the deduction for medical care. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 

Ms. MCSALLY (for herself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. GIBSON, Mr. BISHOP of 

Michigan, Mr. OLSON, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Mr. MACARTHUR, Mr. WEBSTER of Florida, Ms. SINEMA, Ms. JENKINS of Kansas, Mr. DOLD, and 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JULY 5, 2016 

Additional sponsors: Ms. HERRERA BEUTLER, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. HUDSON, 

Mr. TIBERI, Mr. SAM JOHNSON of Texas, and Mr. BOUSTANY

JULY 5, 2016 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on September 22, 2015] 


sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3590 RH

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the increase in the income threshold used in determining 

the deduction for medical care. 


sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3590 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Halt Tax Increases on 

5 the Middle Class and Seniors Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN INCOME THRESHOLD FOR 

7 DETERMINING MEDICAL CARE DEDUCTION. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 213(a) of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘10 percent’’ and 

10 inserting ‘‘7.5 percent’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

12 (1) Section 213 of such Code is amended by 

13 striking subsection (f). 

14 (2) Section 56(b)(1)(B) of such Code is amended 

15 by striking ‘‘without regard to subsection (f) of such 

16 section’’ and inserting ‘‘by substituting ‘10 percent’ 

17 for ‘7.5 percent’ ’’. 

18 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by this 

19 section shall apply to taxable years beginning after Decem20 ber 31, 2015. 


sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 508 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3590 

[Report No. 114–657] 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

in determining the deduction for medical care. repeal the increase in the income threshold used 

JULY 5, 2016 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


sradovich on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2





Certification Pursuant to


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the annual report of Pretium Packaging, L.L.C. and Pretium Finance, Inc. (the “Companies”) on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2012 , as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert A. Robison, the Chief Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                      
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                       
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Companies.




Date: November 30, 2012





/s/  Robert A. RobisonRobert A. RobisonChief Financial Officer