alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Raymond, Appellant, vs. Century Indemnity Company, Respondent.

*June 3*

July *3, 1953.*

*431For the appellant there was a brief by *Stafford & Stafford,*attorneys, and *Robert F. Pfiffner*of counsel, all of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by *Mr. Pfiffner.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Hale, Skemp, Nietsch, Hanson & Schnurrer*of La Crosse, and oral argument by *R. E. Nietsch.*

Fairchild, J.

The plaintiff complains of damage caused by the negligence of one John E. Russell and alleges that at the time Robert Hall, “the plaintiff’s agent and servant was operating plaintiff’s vehicle.” The Century Indemnity Company was the insurer of Ruth Hasseler, owner of the automobile driven by John Russell, and it is set forth in the complaint that “the Century Indemnity Company issued its bond and policy of insurance covering the operator, the said John E. Russell.” The Century Indemnity Company, in its answer, denies covering the operator John E. Russell, while operating said motor vehicle. The issue of liability thus arises, and the question is whether Russell was driving the car with the permission of the individual who was the named insured or “with the permission of an adult member of such assured’s household.”

The son of the named insured, Mrs. Ruth Hasseler, as. set forth in the statement of facts, was in the armed forces of the United States and stationed at Camp McCoy, Wisconsin. It appears clearly enough that the son, twenty-two years of age, had lived with his mother at Green Bay until he entered the army; that he had his mother’s automobile with him. We are of the opinion that nothing has occurred to legally destroy his status as an adult member of his mother’s household. Therefore, his giving permission to Russell to use the car created a question of relationship which is the matter to be investigated under the pleadings. The trial court was in *432error in overruling plaintiff’s offer to bring to the court’s attention material and important facts bearing upon the son’s right under the policy of the named insured to permit Russell to use the car and having that right relate back to his mother.

It appearing from the record that the real controversy has not been fully tried, it is considered that there must be a new trial. We do not find it necessary to labor the matter further as to whether proper motions were made. Sec. 251.09, Stats.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, cause remanded with directions to set aside the judgment entered below and to grant a new trial.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK

Name: Freddie M. KotekTitle:   Chairman of the
Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President of the
Managing General PartnerChief Executive Officer and President
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2004

CHRISTOPHER TYLER LONG; CHRISTOPHER EMMETT LONG; EDY LONG,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

M&M TRANSPORTATION, LLC; MILLER & SONS AUTO AND TRUCK 

REPAIR, INC.; KEVIN E. MILLER; KENNETH ANDREW MILLER, JR.; 

PEGGY MILLER,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief 

District Judge. (3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: April 30, 2015 Decided: May 22, 2015

Before SHEDD, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Christopher James Regan, J. Zachary Zatezalo, Laura P. Pollard, 

BORDAS & BORDAS, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellants. 

Tracey A. Rohrbaugh, Julie R. Shank, BOWLES RICE, LLP, 

Martinsburg, West Virginia; Stephen M. Houghton, DICKIE, MCCAMEY 

& CHILCOTE, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Tyler Long, Christopher Emmett Long, and Edy 

Long appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for 

partial summary judgment and granting Appellees’ revised motion 

for summary judgment. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and 

the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Long v. 

M&M Transp., LLC, No. 3:13-cv-00065-GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 5, 

2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 23
- 0327 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. STEVEN ERIC WALKS,

Defendant and Appellant
.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including March 4 , 202 4, within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 25 2024

01/25/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0327
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Power Medical Interventions, Inc. (the “Company”)for the quarter ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, John P.Gandolfo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|   | /s/ John P.  Gandolfo                         |   |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | John P. Gandolfo                              |   |
|   | Chief Financial  Officer                      |   |
|   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |

 

December 4, 2007

 

1

----
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 Board
of Directors
 TriMont
Real Estate Advisors, Inc
 We
have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's 
Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria
("Management's Report"), 
that TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc (the "Company") complied with
the servicing criteria set forth 
in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's
Regulation AB as of and for the 
year ended December 31, 2012, except for those criteria noted as not
applicable (N/A) within 
Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the 
Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or operating advisor for
the asset backed securities 
transactions (the "Platform"). Reference Exhibit B for the transactions
covered by this examination. 
Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing 
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the 
Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our 
examination. 
Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company 
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, 
evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria for the Platform 
and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. Our 
examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and
securities constituting the 
Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing
activities related to those 
transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria for the period 
covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included
servicing activities related to 
each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform.
Further, our examination was 
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred
prior to the period covered 
by this report and that may have affected the Company's servicing
activities during the period 
covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our 
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the
Company's compliance 
with the applicable servicing criteria.


In our
opinion, management's assertion that TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc
complied with the 
applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and Exhibit B as
of and for the year ended 
December 31, 2012 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material
respects.
 Charlotte,
North Carolina
 /s/
Grant Thornton LLP
 March
1, 2013
# L_2012329EN.01001801.xml

| 29.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 329/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 329/18

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 26 November 2012

appointing a Belgian member and a Belgian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2012/736/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Belgian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Charles PICQUÉ. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Charles PICQUÉ.

| (3) | An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Alain HUTCHINSON as member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Alain HUTCHINSON as member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Alain HUTCHINSON, Membre du Parlement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Alain HUTCHINSON, Membre du Parlement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale,

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Charles PICQUÉ, Ministre-Président du Gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Charles PICQUÉ, Ministre-Président du Gouvernement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 26 November 2012.

For the Council

The President

G. DEMOSTHENOUS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AP RIL 28, 2017

NO. 03

- 14

- 00677

- CR

Thaung Tin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICE S PEMBERTON AND FIEL D

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed

the rec ord and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

district court’s judgment of conviction . Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s

judgment of conviction

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of

costs is made.
Exhibit 99.22

CONSENT OF ENGINEER

Ladies and
Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigned companys name included or incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report entitled The NI 43-101 Technical Report Mineral Resource Estimate for the Mutanga Project, Zambia, Africa dated September 12, 2013 and (2) all
other references to the undersigned company included or incorporated by reference in the registration statement in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp.

Dated: March 19, 2014



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Malcom Titley                                       
|Malcom Titley, B.Sc., MAusIMM, MAIG CSA Global
(UK) Ltd.
Converted by EDGARwiz


EXHIBIT 10.6




ASSIGNMENT




FOR __________________, in hand paid, Securities Counselors, Inc., an Illinois Professional Corporation, attention Randall S. Goulding, 1333 Sprucewood Deerfield, IL 60015 (“Assignor”) hereby assigns and otherwise transfers to __________________________ (“Assignee”) all rights, title and interest held by Assignor in and to the Assigned Property, described as follows:




___________ percent of the claim for legal services of Securities Counselors, Inc. (the “Assigned Property”).




This Assignment shall become effective as of the date below and shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their successors and assigns, subject to the approval of the Court the case of Securities Counselors, Inc. vs. XFormity Technologies, Inc., Case No. 14 AR 588, in The Circuit Court For The 19th Judicial Circuit Lake County, Waukegan, Illinois (the “Litigation”), in which event the Assignee shall be vested in ownership of such Assigned Property and title thereto. The Assignor agrees to take the necessary steps to cause such Assigned Property to be Retitled to the Assignee.




Assignor:

Securities Counselors, Inc.:




By:_______________________

Randall S. Goulding, President




Accepted by Assignee:







By:______________________




_________________________, manager







Dated: As of June 27, 2014
#### A. L. Sharp v. W. B. Arnold, Appellant.

Liquor Nuisance: cessation before action. An action to enjoin a liquor nuisance will not lie where the evidence is uncontradicted that, for some time prior to the beginning of the action, defendant had ceased to sell liquor. In this case no stock of liquors was retained and no government tax paid.

*Appeal from Diclcinson District Gourt.*— HoN. W. B. Quar-toN, Judge.

Saturday, April 8, 1899.

ActioN to enjoin a nuisance caused by the sale of intoxicating liquors. Prom a decree granting the relief prayed, the defendant appeals.

— Reversed.

*Gory & Arnold*for appellant.

*St. Glair & Beigard*for appellee.

*204WatbrmaN, J.

— The defense in this case is that no nuisance existed at the time tbis action was begun. The original'notice was served September 8, 1897, and the petition was hid on the twenty-fifth day of the same month. The evidence shows the sale of beer by defendant on the premises at different times, the last of which was July 4, 1897. Defendant was a witness, and testified, in substance, that he had ceased selling intoxicating liquors prior to the -commencement of this action; that the last sale was the one spoken of, in July. This testimony is in no way controverted. If no nuisance existed when the action was brought, plaintiff was not entitled to a decree. As tending to support this proposition, see *Shear v. Brinkman,*72 Iowa, 699; *State v. Severson,*88 Iowa, 714. *In Judge v.*Kribs, 71 Iowa, 183, relied upon by plaintiff, the defendant claimed to have ceased selling after the action was begun. We do not wish to be understood as holding that, in order to warrant an injunction, actual sales must be shown up to the date of the action to enjoin. But we do say that there must be some evidence of the existence of the nuisance at that time. If, in addition to the sales shown in this case, there had been evidence that defendant kept a stock of liquor, and had it on hand, when the action was brought, or that he paid the special tax to the United States government for the sale of intoxicating liquor after July 4, 1897, or if he had continued to maintain a place fitted for the sale of liquor, there would in either such case have been some evidence to show that his claim of voluntary abatement of the nuisance was a mere pretext to avoid a decree. But there was no such evidence. It is not enough to justify a decree, to show that the defendant at some time in the past has violated the law which is here invoked. The decree must be reversed.
UNCLASSIFIED

UNCLASSIFIED

C:\Users\Robert.Finamore\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\JL0K7VWC\140609reciprocity letter.doc

9 June 2014

Mr Paul Gretch

Director

Office of International Aviation

US Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Avenue SE

Washington DC 20590

Dear Paul, 

CHARTER OPERATIONS BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE UNITED 

STATES OF AMERICA

This letter is to confirm that the UK Government, on the basis of reciprocity, 

will approve requests from US-designated airlines to perform fifth, sixth and 

seventh freedom charter operations on the understanding that the US Government 

will approve similar requests from UK-designated airlines. 

The UK Government also confirms that approval for similar charter operations by US 

airlines to the UK's Overseas Territories will also be granted, where reciprocity 

applies.

Yours sincerely,

Judith

Judith Ritchie

First Secretary (Transport Policy)

cc: Robert Finemore, DoT

 Pavlos Kakoulli, DfT London 

Tel: (202) 588-6696

Fax: (202) 588-7901

E-mail: Judith.Ritchie@fco.gov.uk
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Shaun D. Langford, President (Principal Executive Officer) and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer) of Elray Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.



/s/ Shaun D. Langford

Shaun D. Langford 
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

February 12, 2008



A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0864

SAT Date: 9/10/2013

Print Date: 6/4/2014

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 2-3 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

1 1 2 PMN

1 1 2 Hyd Pdt

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: Yes

Routes of exposure: Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ; Hyd Pdt moderate

Keywords:

 Keywords: SEVER IRR/POSS CORR E,S,L

SENS-S,L

NEURO

UNCERT INH ONCO

AQUATOX-A,C

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0864

FATE: Estimations for hydrolysis product MW 290 

log Kow = 4.59 (E)

log Koc = 3.10 (E)

log Fish BCF = 2.70 (E)

log Fish BAF = 2.79 (E)

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 3
PMN Substance: Liquid with MP < 25 C (E)

S = Reacts

Hydrolysis Half-life ≤ min

VP = 2.8E-5 torr at 25 C (E)

BP = 378 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = PMN 99 via hydrolysis; then Hyd Pdt 60-90 via sorption and biodeg

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = Hyd Pdt wk-mo

Sorption to soils/sediments = Hyd Pdt moderate

PBT Potential: PMN P1B1; Hyd Pdt P1B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = Hyd Pdt moderate

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption of the neat material is nil through the skin, 

while absorption is poor with reaction through the skin for the material in solution, and poor with 

reaction through the lung and GI tract, based on physical/chemical properties. There is concern 

for severe irritation/possible corrosion to the eye, skin, and lung, based on reactivity. There are 

also concerns for neurotoxicity, dermal and respiratory sensitization, and inhalation 

oncogenicity, based on analogs and potentials.

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 1.2

daphnid 48-h LC50 1.9

green algal 96-h EC50 0.53

fish _ chronic value 0.052

daphnid _ chronic 

value

0.61

algal _ chronic 

value

0.32

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for esters; SAR chemical class = 

ester MW 309; log Kow = 4.59 (EPI, hydrolysis product); liquid with mp 

unknown (P); S = reacts rapidly with water at 25 C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 

100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; 

and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 5

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 3
(ppb)

SARs esters

SAR Class esterEcotox Category Esters

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: J. Kwiat

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 3
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/Christopher Johns                                           |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Christopher Johns                                                    |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  October 13, 2009                                                     |
#### O’Hare, Appellant, vs. Fink, Respondent.*

*November 16*

December *15, 1948.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Doar & Knowles*of New Richmond, and oral argument by *W. T. Doar.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Coe & Cameron*of Rice Lake, and oral argument by *William A. Cameron.*

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 costs, on February 15, 1949.

Hughes, J.

The only questions sought to be raised concern the correctness of the trial court’s rulings during the trial. The bill of exceptions having been stricken *(O’Hare v. Fink, ante,*p. 65, 35 N. W. (2d) 320) and the pleadings and findings being sufficient to sustain the judgment, the judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.