alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pinpoint Recovery Solutions Corp., a
Delaware corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
Kevin Cappock, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
his knowledge:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




May 15,
2008





/S/ KEVIN
CAPPOCK


Kevin
Cappock, Chief Executive Officer





[A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
Pinpoint Recovery Solutions Corp. and will be retained by Pinpoint Recovery
Solutions Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
### RE: Regional HazeSIPdocumentcorrection Bachman,TomA. to. 

### Gail Fallon 07/23/201009:48AM Thismessagehasbeen repliedto. 

### 1attachment 

# -m Minnkotaresponseto EPA092208.pdf

Gail: Attached is the document with all pages included. Apparently, a two-sided version was inserted into the final original document and copied and scanned as one-sided. Sorry for the inconvenience!

Tom Bachman Sr. Env. Engr. NO Dept. of Health (701) 328-5188 -----Original Message----­ From: Fallon.Gail@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Fallon.Gail@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:20 AM To: Bachman, Tom A. Subject: Regional Haze SIP document correction

Good morning Tom, While getting your SIP submittal loaded into the docket, I came across a minor issue regarding the attached document. Every other page is mis Can you check and see if there is another version there that includes all the pages? I believe if you email me a new version of this file we can just add it as supporting documentation with a copy of your email y. (See attached file: Minnkota response to EPA 092208.pdf) Thanks, Gail Gail Fallon Regional Haze Program Manager Air Qual Planning Unit (8P-AR) US EPA Region 8 1595 Wynkoop Street Denver, CO 80202-1129 Phone: 303-312-6281 Fax: 303-312-6064 Email: Fallon.Gail@epa.gov
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Gerald Diakow, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ameriwest Minerals
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of January, 2008.


/s/ Gerald Diakow
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of New North Penn Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frederick L. Hickman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







|      |                    |                                       |                         
|----- | ------------------ | ------------------------------------- | ------------------------
|      |                    |                                      
|Date: | September 18, 2007 |                                       | /s/ Frederick L. Hickman
|      |                    | Frederick L. Hickman                 
|      |                    | President and Chief Executive Officer
|
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3218

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude beverage alcohol compounds emitted

from aging warehouses from the definition of volatile organic compounds.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 18 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. MCCONNELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

A BILL

To amend the Clean Air Act to exclude beverage alcohol

compounds emitted from aging warehouses from the definition of volatile organic compounds.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF VOLATILE ORGANIC COM4 POUNDS.

5 Section 302(s) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C.

6 7602(s)) is amended by adding the following at the end

7 thereof: ‘‘Such term shall not include beverage alcohol

8 compounds (ethanol) emitted from aging warehouses.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83908-83909]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24161]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Bureau of Labor Statistics


Data Users Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting and Agenda

    The Bureau of Labor Statistics Data Users Advisory Committee will 
meet on Wednesday, November 6, 2024. This meeting will be held 
virtually from 12:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. EST.
    The Committee provides advice to the Bureau of Labor Statistics 
from the points of view of data users from various sectors of the U.S. 
economy, including the labor, business, research, academic, and 
government communities. The Committee advises on technical matters 
related to the collection, analysis, dissemination, and use of the 
Bureau's statistics, on its published reports, and on the broader 
aspects of its overall mission and function.
    The agenda for the meeting is as follows:

12:00 p.m. Commissioner's Welcome and Remarks
12:30 p.m. Response rates and beyond: How best to describe the quality 
of BLS data
1:15 p.m. Next Generation news releases
2:00 p.m. Break
2:15 p.m. Reimagining, Redesigning, and Rebranding the BLS Classroom
3:00 p.m. Building a trust center on the BLS website
3:45 p.m. Discussion of future topics and concluding remarks
4:00 p.m. Conclusion

    All times are eastern time. The meeting is open to the public. 
Anyone

[[Page 83909]]

planning to attend the meeting should contact Ebony Davis, Data Users 
Advisory Committee, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91d5f0e7f8e2bfd4f3feffe8d1f3fde2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cc88adbaa5bfe289aea3a2b58caea0bfe2aba3ba">[email protected]</span></a>. Any questions about the 
meeting should be addressed to Mrs. Davis. Individuals who require 
special accommodations should contact Mrs. Davis at least two days 
prior to the meeting date.

    Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of October 2024.
Leslie Bennett,
Chief, Division of Management Systems.
[FR Doc. 2024-24161 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-24-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Marlon Taylor, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 852]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Perone, J.), rendered September 6, 2001, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), and criminal facilitation in the fourth degree, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, his conviction was not improperly based solely upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice *(see*CPL 60.22 [1]). Rather, there was corroborative evidence that the defendant provided the shooter with a disguise and a gun shortly before the shooting, that the defendant was at the scene of the shooting, and that he had a motive to have the victim shot *(see People v Breland,*83 NY2d 286 [1994]; *People v Hudson,*51 NY2d 233 [1980]; *People v Robinson,*297 AD2d 296 [2002]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive *(see People v Suitte,*90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

*615The defendant’s remaining contentions either are unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Ritter, J.P., Santucci, Adams and Crane, JJ., concur.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements:

(1) Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129714, 333-126771, 333-51496 and
333-104389) pertaining to the stock option plans of Scottish Re Group Limited,
and

(2) Registration Statement (Form S-3 No. 333-113030) pertaining to the shelf
registration of securities of Scottish Re Group Limited;

of our reports dated February 28, 2007, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedules of Scottish Re Group Limited, Scottish Re
Group Limited's management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control
over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting of Scottish Re Group Limited, included in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 28, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Gouverneur Bancorp Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Richard F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes
-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by
                  the Report.


December 19, 2006                      By: /s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Richard F. Bennett
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeshare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
      Kenneth Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




December
                  4, 2007
            :
            /s/ *Paul
              Kenneth
              Thompson*Paul
              Kenneth ThompsonChief
                Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure America Acquisition Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Harvey L. Weiss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
                10, 2008
            
            /s/
                Harvey L. WeissHarvey
                L. WeissPrincipal
                Executive Officer
### DEPARTMEN T O F TRANSPORTATIO N •..••-'I\ C
Augus t 13,201 0 

## Cit y of^^OOfes t Columbi a Bridgin g Past , Presen t an dFutur e OFFIC E O F TH E MAYO R Bobb y E
. Horton , Mayo r ?Oi Q OC T 

### OPERATION S A 10: 2 3

Ms
. Susa n Kurlan d Assistan t Secretar y fo r Aviatio n & Internationa l Affairs , X- 1 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E W88-32 4 Washington , D C 2059 0 Subject : Smal l Communit y Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Gran t Applicatio n Docke t OST-2010-012 4 Columbi aMetropolita n Airpor t - Columbia , S C Dea r Ms
. Kurland : A s th e Mayo r

o f Wes t Columbia , S C an dafre'qiien t ai r traveler , 1 strongl y support th e ai r servic e proposa l detaile di n th e Smal l Community Ai r Servic e Developmen t

Progra m gran t application
. Commercia l ai r servic e a t Columbi aMetropolita n Airpor t play s avital rol e in providin g suppor

t t o education , government , business , an dleisur e trave l to/fro m th e area . Future community growt h o f th e Columbi acornmunity depends, i n part , on th e airport' s ability to mee t

th e need s o f

existin g local businesse s a s wel l a s companie s considerin g Columbi aa s alocatio n fo r thei r operations
. Th e proposa l t o support improve dai r

servic e wil l greatl y improv e ou r

ability t o remai n competitiv e in th e global marketplace , whic h i s th e basi s fo

r supportin g th e local econorn y an dattractin g ne w businesse s an d resident s to th e area . Th e Columbi aMetropolita n Airport ha s forge dstron g tie s wit h th e busines s community to retai n an dimprov e local ai r service. W e appreciat e th e opportunity to expan dtha t partnershi p t o includ e th e U.S
. Departmen t o f Transportatio n throug h th e Smal l Community Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Program
.

Cit y o f Wes t Columbia , S C
P.O
. Bo x 404 4 • Wes

t Columbia , S C 29171-404 4 (803 ) 939-861 2 (phone )
1Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(a).

NO. 07-02-0489-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JUNE 17, 2003

______________________________

IN THE INTEREST OF S.C.H. AND S.L.H., MINOR CHILDREN

_________________________________

FROM THE 251ST DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

NO. 50123-C; HONORABLE PATRICK A. PIRTLE, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

Appellant Danny Morris Henry perfected this appeal from the trial court’s order in

a suit to modify the parent-child relationship. Pending before this Court is Henry’s motion

to dismiss the appeal by which he represents that he wishes to withdraw his notice of
2

appeal. The motion is signed by Henry and his counsel and by the attached certificate of

conference, counsel indicates that appellee Dawn Lynn Wauer is in agreement.

Without passing on the merits of the appeal, pursuant to Rule 42.1(a)(1) of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure we grant the motion and dismiss the appeal. Having

dismissed the appeal at Henry’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained and

our mandate will issue forthwith.

Don H. Reavis

 Justice
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure America Acquisition Corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
      I, Harvey L. Weiss, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




December
                7, 2007
            
            /s/
                Harvey L. WeissHarvey
                L. WeissPrincipal
                Executive Officer
# L_2012212EN.01002002.xml

| 9.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 212/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 212/20

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Decision 2012/424/CFSP of 23 July 2012 implementing Decision 2011/782/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 196 of 24 July 2012
  )

On page 84, Annex, ‘Entities’, entry 2, fourth column, ‘Date of listing’:

the date ‘
  24.7.2012
  ’ shall be added.

---
#### Delware, Appellant, vs. Delware, Respondent.

*September 12*

October *9, 1951.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Joseph N. Futowsky,*attorney, and *Arlo McKinnon*of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. McKinnon.*

*H. William Ihrig*of Milwaukee, for the respondent.

*500Gehl, J.

We consider it unnecessary to recite in any great detail the history of the relationship between the parties and their conduct. They were married on August 24, 1935. After about seven years of married life the husband, with some basis in fact, became suspicious that the wife was associating with another man. She spent a number of evenings away from their home until late hours. Finally, on November 7, 1942, at 3 a. m., to “teach her a lesson” he locked the door of the house and she was unable to enter. She returned the next day, gathered her clothes and, except for an occasional meeting, sometimes for discussion of the subject of reconciliation, they have lived apart.

There is some dispute as to what took place at these meetings, but we find it unnecessary to consider the testimony in that respect, except as it bears upon the question whether defendant’s refusal to resume the marital relation was wilful and unreasonable. If it was not, the trial court properly denied the divorce. To constitute desertion there must be an unreasonable refusal to terminate the separation and an intention' of continuing the separation. *Schopps v.*Schopps, 188 Wis. 151, 205 N. W. 829. There must be a fixed and deliberate intention to terminate the relation. 27 C. J. S., Divorce, p. 562, sec. 35.

In his memorandum opinion the trial judge said that since November 7, 1942, the parties lived apart, “each party blaming the other for not arriving at some> agreement to re-establish their marital status.” The same expression is contained in the formal findings. Apparently, this conclusion is based upon the wife’s testimony that at the meetings at which the resumption of the relation was discussed the plaintiff demanded that as a condition she consent that she work and “bring all checks home to him,” and that he was to take charge of all the money she made, that she was to “stay home under his jurisdiction at' all times,” that he made no effort to provide a home and that he did not want *501to keep up a house; and her testimony that he wanted to be alone and to be free to come and. go as he wished.

From the quoted portion of the opinion and the finding referred to, it appears that the court determined that the wife’s refusal to resume the marital relation was not unreasonable. We cannot say that the evidence preponderates against the finding that the severance was the result of disagreements, nor avoid the necessary implication that it was these disagreements rather than an unreasonable refusal on the part of the wife to resume the relation which caused the continued severance.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.