alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 382 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-46, K2025-45.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24038 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BENITO PEREZ LOPEZ; MARIA

REMEDIOS RODRIGUEZ,

 Petitioners,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-71170

Agency Nos. A079-535-327

 A079-535-673

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 17, 2012** 

Before: LEAVY, PAEZ, and BEA, Circuit Judges.

Benito Perez Lopez and Maria Remedios Rodriguez, natives and citizens of

Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

order denying their motion to reopen based on ineffective assistance of counsel. 

FILED

APR 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the

denial of a motion to reopen, and review de novo claims of due process violations. 

Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791-92 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny the

petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioners’ motion to

reopen as untimely because the motion was filed more than two years after the

final order of removal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and petitioners failed to

establish the due diligence required for equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 897 (9th Cir. 2003).

In light of our disposition, we need not reach petitioners’ remaining

contentions.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report Of Foreign Private Issuer pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Satélites Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V. (the Company) on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Cynthia Pelini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
that to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/ CYNTHIA PELINI
Cynthia PeliniChief Financial Officer
 June 30, 2005
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Timeshare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul
      Kenneth Thompson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




January
                31, 2008
            
            /s/ *Paul
              Kenneth Thompson*Paul
                Kenneth ThompsonChief
                Executive Officer
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ISAAC A. POTTER, JR.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant-Appellee.

______________________ 

2014-5130

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal 

Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00459-JFM, Senior Judge James F. 

Merow.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

In this court’s August 19, 2014 order, we directed 

Isaac A. Potter, Jr. to show cause as to why his appeal 

should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Mr. 

Potter has now filed a “Motion for an Order to Show 

Cause,” a “Motion to Challenge Jurisdiction in the United 

States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit,” and a 

“Motion for Relief from Judgment.” Mr. Potter’s motions 

Case: 14-5130 Document: 15 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2014
2 POTTER v. US

include a “Motion to Disqualify . . . Daniel E. O. Toole 

(Clerk).”

This court has jurisdiction over appeals from final decisions of the United States Court of Federal Claims. 28 

U.S.C. § 1295(a)(2). The Court of Federal Claims, however, has not yet entered a final decision in Mr. Potter’s

case. Mr. Potter may, of course, file a notice of appeal 

after the Court of Federal Claims disposes of all claims 

and enters a final decision.

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

 (3) The motion to disqualify is denied. All other 

pending motions are denied as moot.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Mona Harrington 

 Mona Harrington 

 Chief Deputy Clerk 

s30

Case: 14-5130 Document: 15 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2014
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83926-83927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24064]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage [supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service <SUP>TM</SUP>.

[[Page 83927]]


ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service [supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage [supreg] Contract 457 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-57, K2025-56.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24064 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### City of Madison, Respondent, vs. Fitzgerald, Appellant.

*May 15*

June *15, 1945.*

*196For the appellant there was a brief by *Woodward & May*of Madison, and oral argument by *Arthur L. May.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Harold E. Hanson,*city attorney, and *Alton S. Heassler,*assistant city attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Heassler.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The .defendant was arrested on June 10, 1944, charged with having driven his automobile while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. The only question raised upon this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the finding of the circuit court. No useful purpose would be served by setting out the evidence in this opinion, it being ample to sustain the finding of the trial court.

Some question is sought to be raised in regard to the so-called balloon test, which was submitted to by the defendant without objection on his part. Inasmuch as there is other evidence sufficient to sustain the finding and the record is very scanty, neither the accuracy nor sufficiency of the balloon test should be discussed in this case.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### State of Iowa, Appellee, v. Lee Nolta, Appellant.

March 6, 1928.

*596*Bert B. Welty*and *Welty <& gfoper,*for appellant.

*John Fletcher,*Attorney-general, and *Carl J. Stephens,*Assistant Attorney-general, for appellee.

EvaNS, J.

Two grounds of reversal are specified: (1) That the verdict was not sustained by the evidence; (2) That the punishment was excessive.

The evidence was in conflict. The testimony of the witnesses Costello and Young, introduced by the State, was self-eontradietory to a marked degree, and in our judgment was entitled to little, if any, credit. But, apart from this testimony, the other evidence, if believed, was clearly sufficient to sustain the verdict.

The punishment inflicted *was*severe, but it.was within the provisions of the statute. The statute indicates the clear legislative intent that the crime charged, if proven, shall draw severe penalty. The defendant is the head of a family, and was the renter of a farm, which' he had occupied for sixteen years. These circumstances were in his favor. It is manifest that the punishment inflicted will operate upon him with great severity. But it is not our function to palliate such a sentence, unless the record shows some substantial reason for our interfering. The defendant made no showing in the court below for a mitigation of sentence. The record before us, therefore, brings nothing to our attention upon which we could predicate interference. The evidence in support of the conviction is very substantial.

The judgment below is, *accordingly,*— Affirmed.

SteveNS, C. J., and Faville, Kindig, and Wagner, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 21.1
 Subsidiaries of Mediacom LLC
  State of Incorporation
    
    Names under whichSubsidiary
    
    or Organization
    
    subsidiary does businessMediacom Arizona LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Arizona Cable NetMediacom Cable LLCMediacom California LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom California LLCMediacom Capital Corporation
    
    New York
    
    Mediacom Capital CorporationMediacom Delaware LLC
    
    New York
    
    Mediacom Delaware LLCMaryland Mediacom DelawareMediacom Illinois LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Illinois LLCMediacom Indiana LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Indiana LLCMediacom Indiana Partnerco LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Indiana PartnercoMediacom Indiana Holdings, L.P.
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Indiana Holdings, L.P.Mediacom Iowa LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Iowa LLCMediacom Minnesota LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Minnesota LLCMediacom Southeast LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Southeast LLCMediacom New York LLCMediacom Wisconsin LLC
    
    Delaware
    
    Mediacom Wisconsin LLCZylstra Communications Corporation
    
    Minnesota
    
    Zylstra Communications CorporationIllini Cable Holding, Inc.
    
    Illinois
    
    Illini Cable Holding, Inc.Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.
    
    Illinois
    
    Illini Cablevision of Illinois, Inc.
Exhibit 24.1

POWER OF ATTORNEY

The undersigned, as a trustee of Great Lakes REIT (the "Company"), does hereby constitute and appoint Richard A. May, Richard L. Rasley and James Hicks, and each
of them, as his true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 and any and all amendments hereto, and to file the same, with
exhibits and schedules thereto, and other documents therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact, full power and authority to do
and perform each and every act and thing necessary or desirable to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, thereby ratifying and
confirming all that said attorney-in-fact, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 11th the day of March, 2003.

|/s/MATTHEW S. DOMINSKIMatthew S. Dominski |  | 
|----------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/PATRICK R. HUNTPatrick R. Hunt         |  | 
|/s/DANIEL P. KEARNEYDaniel P. Kearney     |  | 
|/s/LEANDRA R. KNESLeandra R. Knes         |  | 
|/s/DONALD E. PHILLIPSDonald E. Phillips   |  | 
|/s/JAMES E. SCHRAGERJames E. Schrager     |  | 
|/s/RICHARD E. TERRYRichard E. Terry       |  | 

---

QuickLinks
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 28, 2013

d0520 

# Order

Clerk May 28, 2013

146345

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 146345

COA: 310344

Wayne CC: 08

- 006491

- FH

CRAIG ANDERSON,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 24, 2012

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defe ndant has

failed to meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Pamela J.
Montpelier, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Pamela J. Montpelier                    
|Pamela J. Montpelier Chief Executive Officer
|                                            
|September 10, 2004                          



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 23.1


Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
 The Board of Trustees and Shareholders of
 Hersha Hospitality Trust:
  We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-82666, No. 333-113058, No. 333-142073, No. 333-142075, No. 333-147113, No. 333-156661, No. 333-163121, No. 333-163122, No. 333-163123) on Form S-3 and (No. 333-122657, No. 333-151314) on Form S-8 of Hersha Hospitality Trust and subsidiaries of our reports dated March 4, 2010,  with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Hersha Hospitality Trust as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of operations, equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009, and the related financial statement schedule, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, which reports appear in the accompanying Form 10-K of Hersha Hospitality Trust.
 
 /s/ KPMG LLP
   Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
 March 4, 2010
«m-/r

ELECTRONIC RECORD

COA# 04-14-00025-CR OFFENSE: Murder

Frances Rosalez Ford v. The

STYLE: state of Texas COUNTY: Bexar

AFFIRMED AS

COA DISPOSITION: MODIFIED TRIAL COURT: 227TM District Court

DATE: 04/01/2015 Publish: NO TCCASE#: 2011CR2986

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

ELECTRONIC RECORD

STYLE: «Style1» v. «Style2» CCA#: HH-tsr

pje/9 se Petition CCA Disposition:

^J CCA IS: DATE:

JUDGE:

• • • wir

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW II

DATE: Oclh/'?V/J~

JUDGE: fa flsA**-.

SIGNED:

PUBLISH:

PC:

DNP:

MOTION FOR

REHEARING IN CCA IS:

JUDGE:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3257

To establish a Chief Labor Negotiator in the Office of the United States

Trade Representative.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 27 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. HARKIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To establish a Chief Labor Negotiator in the Office of the

United States Trade Representative.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. CHIEF LABOR NEGOTIATOR.

4 (a) ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION.—There shall be

5 in the Office of the United States Trade Representative

6 a Chief Labor Negotiator. The Chief Labor Negotiator

7 shall be appointed by the President, with the rank of Am8 bassador, by and with the advice and consent of the Sen9 ate.
2

•S 3257 IS

1 (b) FUNCTIONS.—The Chief Labor Negotiator shall

2 have as his or her primary function the conduct of trade

3 negotiations relating to labor-related issues and shall have

4 such other functions as the United States Trade Rep5 resentative may direct.

6 (c) COMPENSATION.—The Chief Labor Negotiator

7 shall be paid at the highest rate of basic pay payable to

8 a member of the Senior Executive Service.

Æ
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2951 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2951

  To authorize the Commissioner of Reclamation to conduct a study to 
 investigate opportunities to better manage the water resources in the 
          Salmon Creek watershed of the upper Columbia River.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2000

Mr. Gorton (for himself and Mrs. Murray) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To authorize the Commissioner of Reclamation to conduct a study to 
 investigate opportunities to better manage the water resources in the 
          Salmon Creek watershed of the upper Columbia River.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SALMON CREEK WATERSHED, WASHINGTON, WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Commissioner of Reclamation may conduct a 
study to investigate the opportunities to better manage the water 
resources in the Salmon Creek Watershed, a tributary to the Upper 
Columbia River system, Okanagoan County, Washington, so as to restore 
and enhance fishery resources (especially the endangered Upper Columbia 
Spring Chinook and Steelhead), while maintaining or improving the 
availability of water supplies for irrigation practices vital to the 
economic well-being of the county.
    (b) Purpose.--The purpose of the study under subsection (a) shall 
be to derive the benefits of and further the objectives of the 
comprehensive, independent study commissioned by the Confederated 
Tribes of the Colville Reservation and the Okanagoan Irrigation 
District, which provides a credible basis for pursuing a course of 
action to simultaneously achieve fish restoration and improved 
irrigation conservation and efficiency.
                                 <all>
```