alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 84863]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23988]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-43-2024]


Foreign-Trade Zone 3; Application for Production Authority; 
Phillips 66 Company; (Renewable Fuels and By-Products); Rodeo, 
California; Correction

SUMMARY: The Federal Register notice published on August 14, 2024 
regarding the application submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the San Francisco Port Commission, grantee of FTZ 3, on behalf 
of Phillips 66 Company (Phillips) is being corrected.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanita Chen at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb819e8a85829f8ac588838e85ab9f998a8f8ec58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e58f90848b8c9184cb868d808ba59197848180cb828a93">[email protected]</span></a> 
or 202-482-1378.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of August 14, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-18105, 
on page 66033, in the second column, the sentence ``Rebuttal comments 
in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be 
submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to October 28, 2024.'' is 
corrected to read as ``Rebuttal comments in response to material 
submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the 
subsequent 15-day period to October 30, 2024.''.

    Dated: August 8, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-23988 Filed 10-23-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

HORIZON LINES, INC. 

2012 INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN 

AMENDMENT TO RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT 

PARTICIPANT: [                    ] 

DATE: [                    ] 

HORIZON LINES, INC., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), hereby amends the terms of the Participant’s outstanding
Restricted Stock Unit Agreements relating to Restricted Stock Units that have been granted to the Participant pursuant to the Horizon Lines, Inc. 2012 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “Plan”) as follows: 

I.     For each Restricted Stock Unit Agreement relating to Restricted Stock Units granted to the Participant under
the Plan, Section 3 relating to settlement of Restricted Stock Units is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 
 “3.
Settlement of Vested RSUs. 
  

	 	(a)	Subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan, including, without limitation, the vesting conditions, the Company shall pay to the Participant within thirty (30) days following
termination of the Participant’s service as a member of the Board (or, if a Change of Control occurs before the Participant’s termination of service as a member of the Board, upon the occurrence of such Change of Control), a single lump
sum cash payment equal to the product of (a) the Fair Market Value of a share of Company Stock determined as of the date of the termination of such Board service (or as of the occurrence of a Change of Control, if earlier) multiplied by
(b) the number of vested RSUs. 

  

	 	(b)	The lump sum payment described in subsection (a) above shall include an additional amount of cash equal to the amount of dividend equivalents (if any) credited to the vested RSUs.” 


  
 1 








 II.     Except as amended hereby, each Restricted Stock Unit Agreement
relating to the Restricted Stock Units granted to the Participant under the Plan shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the Corporation has caused this Amendment to be executed by its duly authorized officer and its corporate seal duly attested as of the day and year first above written. 

 

			
	 HORIZON LINES, INC

		
	 By:
	 	  

		 	 [Name]

		 	 [Title]



 I hereby acknowledge receipt of the above stated Amendment, and I agree to conform to all the terms and conditions of
the Amendment. 
  

			
	Date____________________	  	Signature__________________________________


  
 2
#### Nancy DiGiulio, Respondent, v Richard S. Kirch, Appellant, and Lewis G. Harvey et al., Respondents.

[774 NYS2d 776]

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Richard S. Kirch appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Maltese, J), dated May 16, 2003, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, where discovery aimed *626at uncovering essential facts was still outstanding, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant’s motion for summary judgment *(see Rosa v Colonial Tr.,*276 AD2d 781 [2000]; *see also Destin v New York City Tr. Auth.,*303 AD2d 713 [2003]; *Barletta v Lewis,*237 AD2d 238 [1997]). Altman, J.E, H. Miller, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
# L_2013031EN.01008301.xml

| 31.1.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 31/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.1.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 31/83

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2012/12/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 April 2012 amending Council Directive 2001/112/EC relating to fruit juices and certain similar products intended for human consumption

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 115 of 27 April 2012
  )

Page 3, Article 3(2)

for:

‘2.   The statement “from 28 October 2015 no fruit juices contain added sugars” may appear ...’

read:

‘2.   The statement “from 28 April 2015 no fruit juices contain added sugars” may appear ...’.

---
EXHIBIT
31.1


CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Linquan Hu, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Yi Xin International Copper,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




Date:
      January 8, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Linquan HuLinquan
      HuChief
      Executive Officer
                (Principal
      Executive Officer)
# CERTIFICATION

 

Re:          **Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C6, CommercialMortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6**(the “Transaction”),issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1,2012 (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”), executed in connectionwith the Transaction (capitalized terms used but not defined herein have themeanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement).

                                               __________________________________________

 

I, Jane Lam, certify that:

 

               1.             Ihave reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required tobe filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of MorganStanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C6 (the “Exchange Actperiodic reports”);

 

               2.            Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, donot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 

 

               3.            Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this reportis included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

 

               4.            Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in thisreport under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicer(s) have fulfilled their obligationsunder the servicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and

 

5.            All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to beincluded in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB andExchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.  

 

In giving the certificationsabove, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the followingunaffiliated parties:

 

·        U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

·        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asMaster Servicer

·        LNR Partners, LLC, as Special Servicer

·        Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor

·        CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services,Inc., as Servicing Function Participant

·        National Tax Search, LLC, as ServicingFunction Participant

 

Date:  March 26, 2020

 

 

By /s/ Jane Lam

Name: Jane Lam

Title: Director and President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20533 and #20534; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20009]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 5.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4806-DR), dated August 10, 2024.

# DATES:

Issued on October 9, 2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         November 12, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         May 12, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated August 10, 2024, is hereby amended to extend the deadline for filing applications for physical damages as a result of this disaster to November 12, 2024.

*Incident:*                     Hurricane Debby.                

*Incident Period:*                     August 1, 2024 through August 27, 2024.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-23886 Filed 10-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit 4.1


INVESTOR SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT FOR



CTI INDUSTRIES CORPORATION


Please print or type. Use ink only.
(All Parties Must Sign)


 


The undersigned Investor hereby subscribes
for the purchase of Common Shares of CTI Industries Corporation as set forth herein and certifies that he (i) has received and
relied solely upon the the Prospectus, the documents incorporated by reference in the Prospectus and their respective exhibits
and schedules, and (ii) agrees to all the terms and conditions of this Subscription Agreement.


 


	Dollar Amount of Common Shares
    Subscribed for:  $______________________	Date: ________________


 


	Name of Investor	 	If other than individual check one and indicate
    
		 	capacity of signatory
	 	 	 
	 	 	 ̈  Trust   ̈  Estate   ̈  Uniforms
    Gifts to Minors Act
	(Print)	 	 ̈  Corporation   ̈
    Attorney-in-fact 
	 	 	 ̈  Other:
    ______________  
	 	 	 
	Signature of Investor	 	 
	 	 	If Joint Ownership, check one:
	 	 	 ̈  Tenants
    in Common  ̈ Tenants by the Entirety
	Name of Joint Investor (if any) (Print)	 	 ̈  Joint
    Tenants with Rights of Survivorship
	 	 	 ̈  Community
    Property
	 	 	 
	Signature of Joint Investor	 	 


 


	 
	Social Security or Taxpayer Identification Number


 


	 	Backup Withholding Statement: 
	Investor Address:	 ̈  Please check
    this box only if the investor is
	 	  subject to backup withholding
	 	 ̈  Please check
    this box only if investor is a
	Street Address	  nonresident alien, Foreign
partnership, foreign
	 	  trust, Corporation or foreign
estate
	City/State	Zip Code	 
	 	 	 





	Telephone (_____________________)	Country ____________________Email: _______________________
	 	 
	Passport # _________________________	ID # _______________________________
	 	ID Type


 


Address for Delivery of Common Shares
(if different from above):


 


	 	 	 
	Street Address	City/State	Zip Code        


 


THIS SUBSCRIPTION FOR COMMON SHARES OF
CTI INDUSTRIES CORPORATION BY THE ABOVE NAMED INVESTOR(S) IS ACCEPTED THIS _____ DAY OF _______________, 2014.


 


	 	CTI INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
	 	 	 
	 	By: 	 
	 	 	Stephen M. Merrick, President
#### Kaestner, Respondent, vs. Preferred Accident Insurance Company, Appellant.*

*March 8*

April *5, 1950.*

*7*John V. Evans*of Kenosha, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Becker, Kinnel, Doucette & Mattison*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Carl R. Becker.*

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on June 6, 1950.

*8Brown, J.

Plaintiff’s version of the accident differed materially from that of Clemons, particularly in respect to the courses steered by Clemons in the last one hundred twenty-five feet before the collision. As an overtaking driver plaintiff was in position to see and to know whereof he spoke and his credibility was for the trial court. The findings of fact embraced plaintiff’s version and are in accord with his evidence and that of the passengers in his car. While contrary to appellant’s version, they are not contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the testimony.

Appellant has prepared a schedule of time, space, and relative positions of the two automobiles designed to demonstrate that the Kaestner testimony is incredible. The schedule is based on the hypothetical speed of each automobile at intervals of seconds before the collision. Evidence of speed, time, and distance was necessarily by estimate only and we do not consider that this schedule prepared from such estimates does or can demonstrate that the collision must have occurred otherwise than as plaintiff said or the court found.

Appellant submits that, as this collision took place when Clemons was making a left turn at an intersection and the trial court has found plaintiff negligent in attempting to pass at an intersection, plaintiff’s negligence was at least equal to that of Clemons, citing J. *W. Cartage Co. v. Laufenberg,*(1947), 251 Wis. 301, 28 N. W. (2d) 925. There is at least one significant and controlling difference in the facts of that case and the present one, namely, the collision in the former took place at an intersection where passing was unlawful and “. . . defendant had a right to assume no one would attempt to pass in the intersection.” *(251 Wis.*301, 305.) Clemons, however, was approaching an intersection in the open country, as the exhibits show, upon a highway properly marked by traffic lanes. Passing at such a place is not unlawful (see sec. 85.16 (6), Stats.), and defendant did not have the right to assume no one would do so. Indeed plain*9tiff had blown his horn to warn that he expected to pass. The circumstances in the two cases are so different that we consider the learned trial court was not required to treat the J. *W. Cartage Co. v. Laufenberg Case, supra,*as authority compelling an equal division of causal negligence in the cause on trial.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JESUS OROZCO,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 763 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of June, 2020

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### Carl J. Hanlon *vs.*Ernest Q. Westberg.

February 1, 1939.

*I. R. Shaw & J. A. Anderson, Jr.,*for the defendant.

*A. Bettigole,*for the plaintiff.

Exceptions overruled. The motion for a directed verdict was denied rightly. There was evidence that the defendant, at night, when under the influence of liquor, operated, at a speed of thirty-five to forty miles an hour, an automobile in which the plaintiff was riding as a guest, at a ninety degree curve of the highway to the right, without abating speed or changing direction, drove his automobile across the center of the highway so that it struck and broke the left rear wheels of a well-lighted tractor trailer unit, proceeding on its own side of the highway at the right of the center line thereof, and the plaintiff was injured. There was evidence that the defendant, immediately before the accident, while reprimanding the plaintiff for his previous conduct at a restaurant, turned toward the plaintiff and took his eyes off the road for a period of about thirty seconds, and that the plaintiff warned him “look where you are going.” Clearly there was evidence of deliberate inattention of the defendant to the operation of the automobile. Further statement of the evidence is unnecessary. The evidence as a whole warranted a finding of gross negligence of the defendant supporting the count of the declaration on that ground. *Crowley*v. *Fisher,*284 Mass. 205, 206. *Koufman*v. *Feinberg,*298 Mass. 270, 271, and cases cited. *Picarello*v. *Rodakis,*299 Mass. 33, 36. See, as to operation, under the influence of liquor, of an automobile, *Caldbeck*v. *Flint,*281 Mass. 360, 362. And it could not have been ruled as matter of law that the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The count of the declaration alleging violation of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 89, § 1, need not be considered.