alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State ex rel. Leuch, Appellant, vs. Hilgen, City Clerk, and another, Respondents.

*January 10*—

February *6, 1951.*

*431*E. W. Van Dyke*of Milwaukee, and *P. F. Leuch, in pro. per.,*for the appellant.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Kittsley & Hurth*of Cedarburg, and *Gerald & Huirás,*of Port Washington, and oral argument by *Harold J. Kittsley.*

Hughes, J.

The trial court filed no opinion, so we are unable to ascertain upon what basis the motion to quash was granted. An examination of the record shows that the petition states a cause of action.

> “The motion [to quash] is in the nature of a demurrer, and ordinarily is dependent for its effectiveness on grounds stated in the motion. It cannot be aided by allegations of fact, and, like a demurrer, admits all facts which are well pleaded for the purpose of the motion, and it raises the issue whether any ground for relief is stated.” 55 C. J. S., Mandamus, p. 525, sec. 290.

*432The affidavits and counteraffidavits accompanying the motion indicate that there are issues to be tried. It was therefore error to quash the writ. Since the question of whether a tax should be levied rests upon controverted facts, the court should allow an amendment of the petition to seek placement of the tax upon the next tax roll, and proceed with the litigation.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed and cause remanded with directions to deny the motion to quash and for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.

Gehl, J., took no part.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yellow Hill Energy Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending January 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Craig Lindsay, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
3rd day of March, 2008.


/s/ Craig Lindsay
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit32.2**

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Vangent, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-Q for the fiscalquarter ended September 29, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Christine M.Bailey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that: 

 
|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition  and results of operations of the Company. |

 
| /s/ Christine M. Bailey       |   |
|-------------------------------|--------|
| Christine M. Bailey           |
| Chief Financial Officer       |
| (Principal Financial Officer) |
| November 9, 2007              |

 

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 12

- 00499

- CR

Fausto Abraham QUINONEZ

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 89th District Court, Wichita County, Texas

Trial Court No. 52,103

- C

The Honorable Mark T. Price, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ANGELINI

, JUSTICE MARION , AND JUSTICE BARNARD

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, appellant’s motion to

dismiss this appeal is GRANTED, and this appeal is DISMISSED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.2(a)

.

SIGNED August 14, 2013.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice
#### Keller, Appellant, vs. Friedrichs and wife, Respondents.

*May 5*

June *1, 1942.*

*9For the appellant there was a brief by *John S. Barry*and *Jerome F. Treis,*both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Barry.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Sanville & Cohn*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Milton M. Cohn.*

RoseNberry, C. J.

The sole question raised upon this appeal is whether a tenant may, by the purchase of tax certificates *10outstanding against leased premises and the taking of a tax deed thereon, acquire title as against his landlord. The plaintiff contends that the tenant cannot acquire a tax title as against his landlord because he is under a duty to pay the taxes and rests his contention upon *Dunn v. Snell*(1882), 74 Me. 22. In that case it was held that the mortgagor would not be allowed to purchase the mortgaged premises if sold for taxes for the purpose of defeating the mortgage. In that case it appeared that the mortgagor had covenanted and agreed to pay the taxes; that a tax title thus acquired must be deemed as fraudulently obtained, citing *McMahon v. McGraw*(1870), 26 Wis. 614. In *McMahon v. McGraw,*decided in 1870, it was held that an agent who fraudulently allows land of his principal to be sold for taxes and takes the deed to himself and puts it on record, may be compelled to convey the title to the true owner or the true owner may maintain ejectment relying upon fraud as estopping the defendant from setting up a tax title. It is considered that these cases in no way support the contentions of the plaintiff. By the foreclosure sale the plaintiff in this case acquired the title of the mortgagor who was likewise the landlord of the defendant. The defendant did not permit the taxes to become delinquent. He was under no duty or obligation to pay the taxes. The default in payment of taxes was with the mortgagor, the predecessor in title of the plaintiff. There are no facts in this case which tend to establish a fraud, actual or constructive, nor any breach of duty on the part of the tenant, and the trial court correctly so held.

The contention of .plaintiff, that where an occupant of land pays the taxes on the land he is presumed to do so to protect the paramount title, is without merit. *Perszyk v. Milwaukee E. R. & L. Co.*(1934) 215 Wis. 233, 254 N. W. 753, cited by him, has no application to the facts of this case.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Sterling Oiland Gas Company (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Richard G. Stifel, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 2nd day of
July, 2009.





RICHARD G.
      STIFELRichard
      G. StifelChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarter period ended March 31, 2013 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form
10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of EZJR, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies to his knowledge
that:

|                                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1)                                                             | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|                                                                |                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|(2)                                                             | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                                
|                                                               
|/s/ Adam Alred                                                 
|Adam Alred                                                     
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
|                                                               
|Date: May 20, 2013                                             
|
II

Calendar No. 42

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 293

[Report No. 106–17]

To direct the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to convey certain lands

in San Juan County, New Mexico, to San Juan College.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1999

Mr. DOMENICI (for himself and Mr. BINGAMAN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

MARCH 16, 1999

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To direct the Secretaries of Agriculture and Interior to convey certain lands in San Juan County, New Mexico,

to San Juan College.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OLD JICARILLA ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.

4 (a) CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.—Not later than one

5 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretar-
2

S 293 RS

1 ies of Agriculture and Interior (herein ‘‘the Secretaries’’)

2 shall convey to San Juan College, in Farmington, New

3 Mexico, subject to the terms and conditions under sub4 section (c), all right, title, and interest of the United

5 States in and to a parcel of real property (including any

6 improvements on the land) consisting of approximately ten

7 acres known as the ‘‘Old Jicarilla Site’’ located in San

8 Juan County, New Mexico (T29N; R5W; portions of Sec9 tions 29 and 30).

10 (b) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage

11 and legal description of the real property conveyed under

12 subsection (a) shall be determined by a survey satisfactory

13 to the Secretaries and the President of San Juan College.

14 The cost of the survey shall be borne by San Juan College.

15 (c) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—

16 (1) Notwithstanding exceptions of application

17 under the Recreation and Public Purposes Act (43

18 U.S.C. 869(c)), consideration for the conveyance de19 scribed in subsection (a) shall be—

20 (A) an amount that is consistent with the

21 Bureau of Land Management special pricing

22 program for Governmental entities under the

23 Recreation and Public Purposes Act; and

24 (B) an agreement between the Secretaries

25 and San Juan College indemnifying the Govern-
3

S 293 RS

1 ment of the United States from all liability of

2 the Government that arises from the property.

3 (2) The lands conveyed by this Act shall be

4 used for educational and recreational purposes. If

5 such lands cease to be used for such purposes, at the

6 option of the United States, such lands will revert

7 to the United States.

8 (d) LAND WITHDRAWALS.—Public Land Order 3443,

9 only insofar as it pertains to lands described in subsections

10 (a) and (b) above, shall be revoked simultaneous with the

11 conveyance of the property under subsection (a).
Calendar No. 42

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 293

[Report No. 106–17]

A BILL

To direct the Secretaries of Agriculture and InteNew Mexico, to San Juan College. rior to convey certain lands in San Juan County,

MARCH 16, 1999

Reported without amendment
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Camden Learning Corporation
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended August 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            To
      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company for the period covered by this
  report.




DATE:
      October 9, 2009
            /s/
      Donald W. HughesDonald
      W. HughesPrincipal
      Financial Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Camden Learning Corporation and will be retained by Camden Learning
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 of Atlas Therapeutics Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Georgette Mathers, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of our knowledge:
 
 1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 By:           /s/Georgette Mathers
 Georgette Mathers
 Chief Executive Officer
 Chief Financial Officer
 
 Dated: September 20, 2010
 
 This certification accompanies this report on Form 10-Q/A Amendment No. 1 pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purpose of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Atlas Therapeutics Corporation and will be retained and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alliance Laundry Systems LLC, Alliance Laundry Corporation and Alliance Laundry
Holdings LLC (the Companies) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce P. Rounds, Vice President, and Chief
Financial Officer of the Companies, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Companies.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce P. Rounds    
|Vice President and     
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 9, 2006          

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not,
except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Companies for purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Additional Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52

Higgins, Cortney

to: RobertJ Wayland

03/09/2011 01:44 PM

Cc: Thomas Gillis, Karen Thundiyil, Bill Maxwell, Tom Walton

1 Attachment

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866

Interagency Review_ 03 09 2011.doc

Hi Bob,

Attached you will find additional interagency comments on RIN 2060

‐ AP52

. Additionally, the

comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA, as well as some of the TSDs, are forthcoming.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Cortney

________________________________________________ Cortney Higgins

Policy Analyst

OMB/OIRA/NRE

202.395.7856

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 66 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36316) pertaining to Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 67 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-36316) and Amendment No. 415 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
#### Marshall Investment Company, Appellee, v. D. F. McCoy et al., Appellees; Madison County, Appellant.

APPEAL AND ERROR: Abstracts of Record — Required Time for Filing. If an appeal is taken more than 15 days before the first term of the. Supreme Court thereafter, an abstract need not be filed for said term, but *must*be filed at least 30 days before the next succeeding term, or the appeal will be dismissed.

Headnote 1: 4 C. J. pp. 463, 470.

*Appeal from Maddson District Court.*— W. S. CoopeR, Judge.

March 19, 1926.

Judgment was entered in this case on June 19, 1925. Notice of appeal was served September 5, 1925. The next term of this court began on the 22d day of September, 1925, more than 15 days after the service of notice of appeal. Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal because the abstract was not filed 30 days before the January term, *1926.*—

Motion *sustained; appeal dismissed.*

*C. E. Hamilton,*for appellant.

*John A. & W. T. Guiher,*for appellee.

Morling, J.

In *Mullinex v. Fairfield Nat. Bank,*201 Iowa 137, we said:

“Where the appeal is taken 15 days before the first day of the term, there is nothing in the statutes expressly or by implication prohibiting a hearing at that term; on the contrary, a hearing at such term is expressly provided for where the abstract is filed 15 days before the term. Section 12847,, Code of 1924.”

In that ease, notice of appeal was served less than 15 days before the next following term, and we held that the second term at which it could be heard would be the second term commencing 15 days ornmore after the notice of appeal was served. Following the reasoning of that case and of *Hanson v. Hammell,*107 Iowa 171, we hold that, as the notice of appeal in *758this ease was served more than 15 days before the first day of the September' term, 1925, that term was the first term, and the January term, 1926, was the second term, for the purpose of filing abstraet. The abstract not having been filed 30 days before the January term, 1926, the appeal must be, and it is,— *Dismissed.*

De Grape, C. J.; and Evans and Albert, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q?A of the Company for the quarter
ended March 31, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


   /s/ T J Jesky
----------------------------------
       T J Jesky
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer



Date  September 17, 2010
      ------------------

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





In connection with the Quarterly Report of China BCT Pharmacy Group, Inc. on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief:





(1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operation of the Company.





Dated: November 15, 2011By:
/s/ Huitian TangHuitian TangChief Executive Officer and Chairman





Dated: November 15, 2011By:
/s/ Xiaoyan ZhangXiaoyan ZhangChief Financial Officer