alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





We the undersigned, Brian Anthony Goodman, President and Principal Financial Officer of Elray Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:





(1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of § 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in the Report.





/s/Brian Anthony Goodman


Brian Anthony Goodman


President and Principal Financial Officer





August 23, 2011





A signed original of this written statement required by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
M

We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion at sentencing, and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED. X0

- 4 ,1 

## n, J. Hardesty

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) I947A 2
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 20486 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. GABRIEL ARAUJO URIBE, also known as Gabriel Humberto Araujo Uribe , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:19

- CR

- 114

- 1

Before JONES, HIGGINSON, and WILLETT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Gabriel Araujo
Uribe has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Uribe h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 7, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-20486 Document: 00515302482 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/07/2020No. 19

- 20486

2 appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion fo r leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 19-20486 Document: 00515302482 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/07/2020
EXHIBIT 21.1

Subsidiaries of Registrant

Prospect
Medical Systems, Inc., a Delaware corporation
Prospect Hospital Advisory Services, Inc., a Delaware corporation
ProMed Health Services Company, a California corporation
ProMed Health Care Administrators, a California corporation
Alta Hospitals System, LLC, a California limited liability company
Alta Los Angeles Hospitals, Inc., a California corporation
Alta Hollywood Hospitals, Inc., a California corporation
Brotman Medical Center, Inc., a California corporation
Prospect Medical Group, Inc., a California corporation
Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
Prospect Professional Care Medical Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
Prospect NWOC Medical Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
Genesis Healthcare of Southern California, Inc., a Medical Group, a California professional medical corporation
StarCare Medical Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
Pomona Valley Medical Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
Upland Medical Group, a Professional Medical Corporation, a California professional medical corporation
Nuestra Familia Medical Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
APAC Medical Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
Santa Ana/Tustin Physicians Group, Inc., a California professional medical corporation
AMVI/Prospect Health Network, a joint venture partnership
Prospect Physician Associates, Inc., a California corporation
Pinnacle Health Resources, a California corporation
Prospect Advantage Network, Inc., a California corporation

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 32.2





Certification by the Chief Financial Officer


of


Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC


pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350


(as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)








Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, the undersigned chief financial officer of Gulf South Pipeline Company,  LLC, hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, (the Report) of Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP (the Partnership) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





March 28, 2013





/s/ Jamie L. Buskill


Jamie L. Buskill


Senior Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer and Treasurer


(principal financial officer)
# L_2012080EN.01001701.xml

| 20.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 80/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 80/17

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2012/158/CFSP

of 19 March 2012

amending Decision 2011/173/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union and, in particular Article 29 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 21 March 2011, the Council adopted Decision 2011/173/CFSP (1).

| (2) | On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 22 March 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On the basis of a review of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the restrictive measures should be renewed until 22 March 2013.

| (3) | Decision 2011/173/CFSP should be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Decision 2011/173/CFSP should be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

In Article 6 of Decision 2011/173/CFSP, the second paragraph is replaced by the following:

"This Decision shall apply until 22 March 2013.".

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 19 March 2012.

For the Council

The President

M. GJERSKOV

---

(1)  
  OJ L 76, 22.3.2011, p. 68.

1

---
^•'ANfiPORWlON 

SERVED FEBRUARY 11 , 2011 >[ QpFpATIOMS 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ' 'H rE3 1 ! P 2:l|0 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF 

TROMBETTA CORPORATION 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP10WP0014 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMSNO. FAA-2010-1219 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2009WP700222) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

lie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative L 

Attachment - Service List 
iwwp^wsHWi VfS^ ^ • wim^ WW-

\ -\A}d$. 

FAA Dod^Mo, CPIOWPOOH 

(Civil Peni^li^on) 

t!OPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk,|A< 

Wilbur Wright Buildi: 

/ ''i.',uim',M ) 

Paul Lindsay, General Manager 

Trombetta, Respondent i 

N88 WI3901 Main Street 

Menomonee Falls, WI 53051 

TEL: 262-251-5454 

FAX: 262-251-5767 

Lisa J. Toscano, Complainant's Counsel 

Attorney, Office of the Regional Couiiseji, 

Westerft-Pacific Region, AWP-7 I 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P d. febx 92007 ' 

Los Angeles, CA 90009-2007 

TEL: 310-725-7110 ? " 

FAX: 310-725-6816 

.i... 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodv^dn, Mdminis0&tiw Lew Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation ; 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E|2^^, | 

Washington, DC 20590 j 

TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisfr 

202-366-5121 Legal Assistant! 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

.'A'-

S<'</-

^'mi-H' 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in pets^jH-jflpr 

Aviation Administration, 800 Independence M'eie^i ,, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, |\dC4M 

t^-«^Hi(i$r, use the folUn 

-Wti^t Building—S«h« si 

Federal 

9, Washingtjpn,
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SOFONIAS ALFARO

- REYES,

Petitioner,

v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 19

- 70742

Agency No. A087

- 764

- 166

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2 , 2020 * *

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Sofonias Alfaro

- Reyes , a native and citizen of Honduras
, petitions for
review of the Board of Immigra tion Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal
from an immigration judge’s decision denying his application for relief under the
Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) and den ying his request to remand and
terminate proceedings

. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

DEC 9 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 70742

factual findings for substantial evidence

. Zehatye v. Gonzales , 453 F.3d 1182,

1184

- 85 (9th Cir. 2006). We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion

to remand. Movsisian v. Ashcroft , 395 F.3d 1095, 1098 (9th Cir. 2005). We deny
the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the BIA ’s denial of CAT relief because

Alfaro

- Reyes failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with
the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Honduras

. See Aden

v. Holder , 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009) ; see also Zheng v. Holde r, 644 F.3d

829, 835

- 36 (9th Cir. 2011) (possibility of torture too speculat ive)

. The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Alfaro

- Reyes’ request to
remand and terminate proceedings where his contention that the immigration court
lacked jurisdiction over his proceedings is foreclosed by Aguilar Fermin v. Barr
, 958 F.3d 887, 895 (9th Cir. 2020) (omission of certain information from NTA can
be cured for jurisdictional purposes by later hearing notice).

As stated in the court’s June 26, 2019 order, the temporary stay of removal

remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED

.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of First Blush Brands, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barrett
Carrere, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
November 22, 2010





By:
                  /s/
      Barrett CarrereBarrett
      CarrereChief
      Financial Officer andSecretary(Principal
      Executive andFinancial
      Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
First Blush Brands, Inc. and will be retained by First Blush Brands, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
#### Saunders, Respondent, vs. Saunders, Appellant.

*April 12*

May *18, 1943.*

*95The cause was submitted for the appellant on the brief of *John Garvin,*attorney, and *G. Arthur Johnson*of counsel, both of Ashland, and for the respondent on the brief of *Lamoreux & Cate*of Ashland.

Fairchild, J.

The trial court ordered the city clerk to pay the pension money owing to the appellant directly to the clerk of the court to be paid to the respondent to satisfy her claims for alimony and for the support of the minor child. Regardless of the merits of respondent’s claims, no fact giving the court jurisdiction to make this order to the city clerk has been shown, and it is considered that the order to said clerk was outside of the jurisdiction of the court. This is not an attempt on the part of respondent to proceed under sec. 304.21, Stats.

Appellant relies on sec. 62.13 (9) (d), Stats., which is the exemption clause in the pension law. It is considered that this provision is not applicable in the instant case. See 11 A. L. R. 123; 106 A. L. R. 669. A pension of this sort is as much for the benefit of the family and dependents of the pensioner as it is for him, and their claims cannot be defeated by relying on the exemption clause. See *Hodson v. New York City Employees’ R. System,*243 App. Div. 480, 278 N. Y. Supp. 16. The amount of the alimony has been re-examined by the. trial .judge who has indicated as clearly as he properly can the fund out of which it is to be paid.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed so far as the city clerk is concerned, and affirmed in other respects.
Exhibit
99.18


CONSENT








Ladies and
Gentlemen:








The undersigned hereby
consents to (1) the references to the undersigned’s name
included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form
40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the reports entitled
(a) “Technical Report with an Updated Mineral Resource
Estimate for the Midwest Property, Northern Saskatchewan,
Canada” dated March 26, 2018, and (b) "Technical Report with
an Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Waterbury Lake
Property, Northern Saskatchewan" dated December 21, 2018, and (2)
all other references to the undersigned included or incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines
Corp.








Dated: March 13,
2020





(Signed) “Dale
Verran”


__________________________


Dale
Verran, MSc, P.Geo, Pr.Sci.Nat.


Denison Mines
Corp.
Douglas W. Domenech Secretary ofNatural Resources 

# COMMONWEALTHofVIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OFENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY Street address: 629 East Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219

Mailing address: P.O. Box 1105, Richmond, Virginia 23218 TDD (804) 698-4021 www.deq.virginia.gov



## JUN 07 

## 2010

Ms. Diana Esher, Director Air Protection Division (3APOO) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029 David K. Paylor Director (804) 698-4000 1-800-592-5482

Reference: Major New Source Review

Dear Ms. Esher: Pursuantto the requirements of 

### § 110 ofthe Clean Air Act, we are officially requesting approval ofa revision to the Commonwealth ofVirginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) approved and submitted under the authority of

### § 10.1-1185 ofthe Code ofVirginia and in accordance with the requirements of40 CFR Part 51 (Requirements for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal ofImplementation Plans). This revision consists ofamendments to Article 8 of9VAC5 Chapter 80, Permits for Major Stationary Sources and Major Modifications Locating in Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration Areas. The amendments are intended to make the state regulation consistent with EPA's final rule for the Phase II implementation ofthe 8-hour ozone standard (November 29, 2005, 70 FR 71612) which revises the definitions of"major modification," "major stationary source," "regulatedNSRpollutant" and "significant," and the list ofexempted facilities to specify that nitrogen oxides are a precursor ofozone in addition to volatile organic compounds. This revision also enables the Commonwealthto meet its outstanding § 11O(a)(2) program requirements as described in "Completeness Findings for § 11O(a) State Implementation Plans for the 8-hour Ozone NAAQS" (March 27,2008, 73 FR 16205). The regulation amendments were adopted by the State Air Pollution Control Board on October 23,2008 under the authority of § 10.1-1308 ofthe Code ofVirginia.

### A number ofminor administrative revisions have also been made. These provisions are to also be considered to be part ofthe SIP revision. Enclosed are the following: 1. A true copy ofthe official regulation (Revision A08) which was published in the Virginia Register ofRegulations on November 24,2008 after being duly adopted bythe State Air Pollution Control Board on October 23,2008, certified by the Office ofthe Attorney General as within the Board's statutory authority on October 23, 2008 and thus fully enforceable under Virginia law, and submitted to the Virginia Registrar on behalfofthe board by the Department of Environmental Quality as a true and accurate copy ofthe duly adopted regulation onNovember 3,2008, providing the evidence required by Section 2.1 (b) and (e) ofAppendix V of40 CFR Part 51. 

### 2. Certification ofpublic participation activities and compliance with state administrative procedures. 3. Public participation record. Ifyou have any questions or need additional information, please let us know.

DKP\kgs TEMPLATES\SIP-REG\REGOO SIP\NONATTN PLANS\2009\A08-SIP.DOC Enclosures
Exhibit 32.1 - President Certification (Section 906)

                        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                         AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of
EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company").  I am delivering this
certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2010 and filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange
Commission ("Form 10-Q").

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I hereby certify that, to the best of my
knowledge, the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


   /s/ T J Jesky
----------------------------------
       T J Jesky
Its:   Principal Executive Officer
       Principal Financial Officer



Date  November 15, 2010
      -----------------

<PAGE>
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, Brian T. Stevens, certify that: 

1.

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Mercedes-Benz Auto Receivables Trust 2012-1 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 

2.

Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.

I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and 

5.

All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following 

unaffiliated parties:  U.S. Bank, National Association, as Indenture Trustee. 

Date:  March 18, 2014 

  /s/ Brian T. Stevens 

Name: Brian T. Stevens Title: Vice President and Controller                             (senior officer of Servicer in charge of servicing function)
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule

47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40744

Conference Calendar

__________________

LARRY D. BONEY,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

P. HESTER; DAVID BLACKWELL, Lt.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

---------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-94-CV-556

---------------------

March 1, 1996

Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Larry D. Boney moves this court for in forma pauperis status

to appeal the district court's order dismissing his civil rights

action under 41 U.S.C. § 1983. Boney fails to raise a

nonfrivolous issue on appeal. Boney's motion for leave to

proceed IFP is DENIED. Because the appeal is frivolous, the

appeal is DISMISSED.
No. 95-40744

-2-

This court previously cautioned Boney to review any pending

appeals in order to avoid the imposition of sanctions. See Boney

v. Collins, No. 95-40742 (Dec. 18, 1995). The district court

also warned Boney that he risked the imposition of sanctions if

he continued to file meritless complaints. Boney v. Collins, No.

CA-C-95-28 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 1995). Accordingly, Boney is

BARRED from filing any pro se, in forma pauperis, civil appeal in

this court, or any pros se, in forma pauperis, initial civil

pleading in any court which is subject to this court's

jurisdiction, without the advance written permission of a judge

of the forum court; the clerk of this court and the clerks of all

federal district courts in this Circuit are directed to return to

Boney, unfiled, any attempted submission inconsistent with this

bar.

APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTIONS IMPOSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.