alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that:



(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;



(2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and we have:



a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and



b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;



c) Disclosed in this annual report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors (or persons fulfilling the equivalent functions):



a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|/s/ Dana S. Philbrook                                       
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Dana S. Philbrook Chief Financial Officer September 17, 2003
# Pacifi c L.L.C
.

P.O
. Bo x2028 0 Mesa , Arizon a85277-028 0 (888 ) 575-454 6 Tol l Fre e www.pacificwings.co m
Decembe r 16 , 201 0

VI AELECTRONI C MAI L Mr . Denni s DeVany , Essentia l Ai r Servic e Chie f U S Departmen t o f Transportatio n EA S andDomesti c Analysi s Divisio n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAvenue , S E W86-47 1 Washington , D C 2059 0 

## 13

Dea r Mr . DeVany , Pacifi c Wing s continue s t o conduc t du e diligenc e wit hregar dt o developmen t o f proposal s fo r provisio no f Essentia l Ai r Servic e a t Clovi s andSilve r City , Ne wMexico . Th e approachin g holidays , however , ar e affectin g ou r abilit yt o schedul e tim e wit hintereste d stakeholders . I norde r t o giv e thi s importan t matte r th e ful l consideratio ni t deserves , w e respectfull yreques t a nextensio no f tim e t o submi t proposal s fo r thes e communities , unti l 0 6 JA N2011 . I sincerel yappreciat e you r consideratio no f thi s request . R espetrETiiPa
. 1 y , -z'- ^ jreg 'Kahlstor f Chie f Executiv e Office r Pacifi c Wings , L.L.C .
#### Carney and another, Respondents, vs. McFarlin, Appellant.

*September 10*

October *22, 1946.*

*262For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Lorens & Neubauer*of Milwaukee.

*Ray C. Twining*of Milwaukee, for the respondents.

Fairchild, J.

The appellant urges on this appeal that the evidence viewed in its most favorable light “did not warrant the trial court in finding that a valid contract was established.” The testimony upon the trial with relation to the making of a transcript of the proceedings is all to the effect that there existed a general desire for the recording of the testimony and pertinent statements. Mr. Carney, one of the plaintiffs, was asked to be present for the purpose of making arrangements for providing those who desired them with *263copies. The evidence shows conclusively that at the opening of the afternoon session the chairman announced that arrangement had been made so that anyone desiring a copy or copies could order them from the reporter at twenty-five cents per page. The appellant promptly ordered one copy for himself. Later he ordered eight additional copies, telling the reporter as he did so that there were unions or officials of unions he thought would be interested in having copies. At first he told the reporter he would give her their names and addresses, but then he said, “Well, never mind, I guess you might just as well give me all of the copies and I will see that they get them.” “I guess I will have to'take my chances on getting the money for them.’'’

While it is true that the record shows no specific inquiry or mention of the price of the copies by either the reporter or the appellant at the times he placed his orders, yet his conduct in ordering the copies after the announcement was made, in which it was stated that the price of copies would be twenty-five cents per page, was properly considered and held by the -trial court to be an assent to the terms of the agreement. The order was placed; the respondents performed their part of the agreement; delivery was made, and part payment was made. It thus appears that all essential elements of a contract are present. The efforts of appellant to return the records after they were delivered to him and his attempted repudiation of the contract were not effective.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### The State of Iowa, Appellee, v. B. D. Rea, Appellant.

Criminal law: trial by jury: waiver of right. The right of a trial. by jury is a constitutional guaranty which cannot be waived by a defendant in a criminal case, and a judgment entered on a trial to the court will be reversed on appeal.

*Appeal from Emmett District*Court.— How. W. B. Quar-TON, Judge.

Wednesday, November 23, 1904.

The opinion states the case.

Per Curiam.'—

This case has been submitted upon a transcript of the record in the court below and without arguments of counsel. It appears that tbe defendant was indicted by tbe grand jury of Emmett county upon the charge of doing business as an itinerant physician without having procured a license for that purpose, contrary to tbe provisions *66of Code, section 2581. Defendant demurred to this indictment on the ground that the statute referred to is unconstitutional so far, at least, as it applies to one who has been duly admitted to the practice of medicine under the laws of the State. The demurrer was overruled, and defendant entered a plea of not guilty. Thereupon, as the record recites, the parties agreed and consented to waive a jury, and to sub■mit the cause to the court for its judgment upon an agreed statement of the facts. Trial was accordingly had to the court without a jury, and the defendant found guilty, and adjudged to pay a fine of $300 and costs. The defendant has appealed from the judgment against him, and, although neither party has thought it worth while to favor this court with an argument, we are not at liberty, as we would be under like conditions in a civil action, to dismiss the appeal, but must inspect the record, and ascertain whether it shows any manifest error in the proceedings. As far back as the case of *State v.*Carman, 63 Iowa, 132, it was decided that the defendant in a criminal case cannot waive a 'jury or consent to trial by the court, and that judgment thus procured .will be reversed on appeal. The substance of the holding there is that the court is wholly without jurisdiction to hear or try an issue of fact in a criminal case without the aid of a jury, and that the consent or waiver of the defendant, does not estop him from taking advantage of the error. That case has since been followed and approved in *State v. Larrigan,*66 Iowa, 426; *State v. Tucker,*96 Iowa, 216; *State v.*Douglas, 96 Iowa, 308; *State v. Lightfoot,*107 Iowa, 351. The provisions of our State Constitution (article 1, section 10) and of the statute (Code, section 5338) which were then deemed controlling of the question remain unchanged, and, while the decisions which we have cited were, rendered by a divided court, the doctrine has been so long adhered to, and its propriety is so apparent, that we are not ready to approve the innovation.

The judgment of the district court is *reversed.*
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3062

AN ACT

To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District

of Columbia submits a performance accountability plan

to Congress, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 3062 ES

1 SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERFORMANCE AC2 COUNTABILITY PLAN.

3 Section 456 of the District of Columbia Home Rule

4 Act (section 47–231 et seq. of the District of Columbia

5 Code) is amended—

6 (1) in subsection (a)—

7 (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘Not

8 later than March 1 of each year (beginning with

9 1998)’’ and inserting ‘‘Concurrent with the sub10 mission of the District of Columbia budget to

11 Congress each year (beginning with 2001)’’;

12 and

13 (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ‘‘that

14 describe an acceptable level of performance by

15 the government and a superior level of perform16 ance by the government’’; and

17 (2) in subsection (b)—

18 (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ‘‘1999’’

19 and inserting ‘‘2001’’; and

20 (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ‘‘for

21 an acceptable level of performance by the gov-
3

S 3062 ES

1 ernment and a superior level of performance by

2 the government’’.

Passed the Senate October 6 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3062

AN ACT

To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District of Columbia submits a performance accountability plan to Congress, and for other purposes.
---

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ming Zhu, Chief Financial Officer of Lake
Victoria Mining Company, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      period ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                       



|Dated: February 14, 2011 | By: | /s/ Ming Zhu                                    
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------------------------------------
|                         |     | Ming Zhu                                        
|                         |     | Chief Financial Officer                         
|                         |     | (Principal Financial Officer and
      Principal
|                         |     | Accounting Officer)                             



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Lake Victoria
Mining Company, Inc. and will be retained by Lake Victoria Mining Company, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE AUDITED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001063698
<NAME> ALLIANCE LAUNDRY HOLDINGS LLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                           3,984
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   34,041
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (463)
<INVENTORY>                                     31,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                75,004
<PP&E>                                         175,403
<DEPRECIATION>                               (117,788)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 219,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           38,218
<BONDS>                                        321,548
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            6,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        50,645
<OTHER-SE>                                   (198,411)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   219,866
<SALES>                                        312,359
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               312,359
<CGS>                                          228,692
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  228,692
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   412
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              31,509
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,081
<INCOME-TAX>                                        29
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,052
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,052
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Security Agency Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Kuykendall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:




/s/ John D. Kuykendall


John D. Kuykendall


Chief Financial Officer




May 26, 2010
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal Service TM.                    

      ( print page 83927)    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service ® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage ® Contract 457 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-57, K2025-56.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24064 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Featured           ‘Frankenstein design’ enables 3D printed neutron collimator          

Featured           Dealing with stress in large-scale additive manufacturing         

Featured           Molecules in action: Canan Karakaya peers into reactor design using computational modeling         

# About | Manufacturing Science

### Contact

YaromPolsky

polskyy@ornl.gov

##  

## Delivering innovation and scientific breakthroughs in next-generation advanced manufacturing

 

The Manufacturing Science Division focuses on the development and implementation of next-generation advanced manufacturing technologies through research and scale-up of new processes and technical capabilities enabling new materials, systems and products. The division has four primary focus areas: composite science and technology, energy and industrial decarbonization, precision manufacturing and machining and secure and digital manufacturing.

Researchers develop technologies to scale up the manufacturing of fiber and composite processes for the fabrication of functional components in energy applications*.* Machining research focuses on precision manufacturing and includes the design, implementation and scale-up of next generation manufacturing systems and processes through the integration of robotics, automation, controls, and machine tools. Secure and digital manufacturing research develops a digital manufacturing platform and a cyber-secure manufacturing ecosystem by integrating a wide variety of manufacturing systems enabled by advanced data analytics, process control and secure communications.

## Facilities 

View a hi-res version of this image

Learn More

View a hi-res version of this image

Learn More

#### 

#### 

#### 

Image Gallery
Advanced Manufacturing Fact Sheet

## Current Research

## News

‘Frankenstein design’ enables 3D printed neutron collimator 

## News

Dealing with stress in large-scale additive manufacturing

## News

Molecules in action: Canan Karakaya peers into reactor design using computational modeling

## News

Metal steam turbine blade shows cutting-edge potential for critical, large 3D-printed parts
**Exhibit 12.2**
**Section 302 Officer Certification**
I, Cynthia Pelini, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Satélites Mexicanos,S.A. de C.V.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company andhave:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the periodin which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the company’smost recent fiscal year that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The company’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of company’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’sability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the company’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date:  July 15, 2004          /S/  CYNTHIA PELINI   Cynthia Pelini   *Chief Financial Officer*