alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.4

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Raymond Silcock, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Neptune Wellness Solutions Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

Date: April 21, 2023

|                                                                                                                         |        |        |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                    |   |   |
| /s/ Raymond Silcock                                                                                                     |
| Raymond Silcock

Chief Financial Officer

Neptune Wellness Solutions Inc.

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
I, Richard Hiron, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bow Valley Ventures,  Inc. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  January 14, 2009/s/Richard HironBy:Richard HironPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA

No. 14-0789

Filed December 24, 2014

STATE OF IOWA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

MICHAEL PAUL EATON,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Bremer County, James M. Drew 

(plea) and Rustin T. Davenport (sentencing), Judges. 

Michael Eaton appeals his convictions for possession of a controlled 

substance with intent to deliver, methamphetamine; possession of a controlled 

substance third offense, marijuana; eluding; and carrying weapons. AFFIRMED.

Mark C. Smith, State Appellate Defender, and Robert P. Ranschau, 

Assistant Appellate Defender, for appellant.

Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Tyler J. Buller, Assistant Attorney 

General, and Kasey Wadding, County Attorney, for appellee.

Considered by Mullins, P.J., and Bower and McDonald, JJ.
2

MCDONALD, J.

Michael Eaton pleaded guilty to and was convicted of possession of a 

controlled substance with intent to deliver, methamphetamine; possession of a 

controlled substance third offense, marijuana; eluding; and carrying weapons; all 

in violation of Iowa Code sections 124.401(1)(c)(6), 124.401(5), 321.279(3)(a) 

and (b), and 724.3(1) (2011). On appeal, he contends his counsel rendered 

constitutionally deficient performance by failing to file a motion in arrest of 

judgment when the district court failed to advise Eaton of the immigration 

consequences of his pleas. To establish his claim for ineffective assistance of 

counsel, Eaton is required to establish counsel breached a duty owed Eaton and 

prejudice arose from the breach. “[T]o satisfy the prejudice requirement, the

defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s 

errors, he or she would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going 

to trial.” State v. Straw, 709 N.W.2d 128, 138 (Iowa 2006). There is no record 

evidence in support of the claim.1 Accordingly, the claim is denied on the merits. 

The convictions are affirmed without further opinion. See Iowa Ct. R. 21.26.

AFFIRMED.

 

1

 We note that filing a claim for ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal is 

unnecessary to protect the defendant’s right to seek relief. See Iowa Code § 814.7 

(2013) (“The claim need not be raised on direct appeal from the criminal proceedings in 

order to preserve the claim for postconviction relief purposes.”). A party “may, but is not 

required to, raise an ineffective assistance claim on direct appeal . . . if the party has 

reasonable grounds to believe that the record is adequate to address the claim on direct 

appeal.” Iowa Code § 814.7(2). Presenting an underdeveloped claim on direct appeal 

not only wastes the party’s resources and judicial resources, it poses a litigation risk to 

the defendant, who may receive an adverse judgment on a potentially meritorious claim 

due to the presentation of a claim on an underdeveloped record. The record is 

sufficiently developed in this case for a decision on the merits.
3
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3111 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3111

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an extension of 
 time for the payment of estate tax to more estates with closely held 
                              businesses.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 27 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

 Mr. Inouye (for himself and Mr. Akaka) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide an extension of 
 time for the payment of estate tax to more estates with closely held 
                              businesses.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCREASE IN NUMBER OF ALLOWABLE PARTNERS AND SHAREHOLDERS IN 
              CLOSELY HELD BUSINESSES.

    (a) In General.--Paragraphs (1)(B)(ii), (1)(C)(ii), and 
(9)(B)(iii)(I) of section 6166(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
(relating to definitions and special rules) are each amended by 
striking ``15'' and inserting ``75''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to estates of decedents dying after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### Jasper BIRDSONG, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 19875.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1938.

Joseph L. Dunigan, of El Paso, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for assault with a prohibited weapon; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Upon the written request of the appellant, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverdale Mining Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Vladimir Vaskevich, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 3rd day of August, 2009.



| | VLADIMIR VASKEVICH                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Vladimir Vaskevich,                                
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Riverdale Mining Inc. and will be retained by Riverdale Mining Inc.  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1425

CORUS STAAL BV,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

ARCELORMITTAL USA INC.,

Defendant.

Richard O. Cunningham , Steptoe & Johnson LLP, of Washington, DC, argued

for plaintiff-appellant. Wi th him on the brief were Joel D. Kaufman

, Alice A. Kipel , and

Jamie B. Beaber

.

Claudia Burke , Senior Trial Attorney, Comme rcial Litigation Branch, Civil

Division, United States D epartment of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for

defendants-appellees United St ates, et al. With her on the brief were Tony West

, Assistant Attorney General, Jeanne E. Davidson , Director, and Patricia M. McCarthy

, Assistant Director. Of counsel on the brief was Sapna Sharma , Attorney, Office of the

Chief Counsel for Import Administration, United States Department of Commerce, of

Washington, DC.

Ellen J. Schneider , Skadden Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, of Washington,

DC, argued for defendant-appellee Un ited States Steel Corporati on. On the brief were

Robert E. Lighthizer

, Jeffrey D. Gerrish and Luke A. Meisner . Of counsel was James C.

Hecht

.

Appealed from: United States Court of International Trade

Judge Judith M. BarzilayNOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.



## United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

2009-1425

CORUS STAAL BV,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES and DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES STEEL CORPORATION,

Defendant-Appellee,

and

ARCELORMITTAL USA INC.,

Defendant.



## Judgment

ON APPEAL from the United States Court of International Trade

in CASE NO(S). 07-00221

This CAUSE having been hear d and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (PROST and MOORE, Circuit Judges , and GUILFORD, District

Judge * ).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

* Honorable Andrew J. Guilford, Distr ict Judge, United Sates District Court for

the Central District of Califo rnia, sitting by designation.ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED April 8, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

Jan Horbaly, Clerk
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20265 No. 97-20269 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus LARRY HOUSMAN, SR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-96-CR-82-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 15, 1998 Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Larry Housman, Sr., appeals his guilty-plea conviction for five counts of trafficking in counterfeit services, conspiracy to violate the laws of the United States, possession of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, and possession of device-making equipment. He argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. He contends that his guilty plea was unknowing and involuntary2

because the Government breached its promise that his sentence would be based on a $40,000 total loss. The record of the rearraignment indicates that there was no plea agreement and that the Government did not promise that Housman’s sentence would be based on a $40,000 loss. At the rearraignment, Housman stated that no promises of leniency were made and that he understood his sentence would be based U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and on the facts presented in the Presentence Report. Housman’s statements in open court carry a strong presumption of truth. See Blackledge v. Allison , 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977). The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Housman’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. See United States v. Thomas , 13 F.3d 151, 152-53 (5th Cir. 1994).
AFFIRMED.
# L_2012004EN.01001601.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 4/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 4/16

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 14 December 2011

establishing the position to be taken by the European Union within the Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organisation as regards a request for granting a waiver in order to give preferential treatment to services and service suppliers of least-developed countries

(2012/8/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular of Articles 91, 100 and the first subparagraph of Article 207(4), in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | Article IX of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (WTO) sets out the procedures for the granting of waivers concerning the Multilateral Trade Agreements in Annex 1A or 1B or 1C to that Agreement and their annexes. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article IX of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation (WTO) sets out the procedures for the granting of waivers concerning the Multilateral Trade Agreements in Annex 1A or 1B or 1C to that Agreement and their annexes.

| (2) | A waiver has been requested whereby WTO Members would be enabled to grant preferential treatment to services and service suppliers of least-developed countries without according the same treatment to like services and service suppliers of all other WTO Members by exceptionally derogating from the obligation under paragraph 1 of Article II of the General Agreement on Trade in Services. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A waiver has been requested whereby WTO Members would be enabled to grant preferential treatment to services and service suppliers of least-developed countries without according the same treatment to like services and service suppliers of all other WTO Members by exceptionally derogating from the obligation under paragraph 1 of Article II of the General Agreement on Trade in Services.

| (3) | It is in the interest of the European Union to give its support to that request for a waiver and thus to conclude a part of the Doha Development Agenda negotiations on services which is of special interest to least-developed country Members, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It is in the interest of the European Union to give its support to that request for a waiver and thus to conclude a part of the Doha Development Agenda negotiations on services which is of special interest to least-developed country Members,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The position of the Union within the Ministerial Conference of the WTO shall be to support the request under paragraph 3 of Article IX of the Marrakesh Agreement establishing the World Trade Organisation for a waiver enabling WTO Members to grant preferential treatment to services and service suppliers of least-developed countries.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Geneva, 14 December 2011.

For the Council

The President

M. NOGAJ

---
# L_2012206EN.01002401.xml

| 2.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 206/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 206/24

---

Corrigendum to Political and Security Committee Decision EU BAM Rafah/1/2012 of 3 July 2012 on the appointment of the Head of European Union Border Assistance Mission for the Rafah Crossing Point (EU BAM Rafah)

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 186 of 14 July 2012
  )

In the contents on the cover and on page 30, number of the Decision:

for:

‘(2012/382/EU)’,

read:

‘(2012/382/CFSP)’.

---
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Melissa Schessler as President and CEO, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Meltdown Massage and Body Works, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by       others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control financial reporting;  5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting. Date: December 18, 2007 By: /s/ Melissa Schessler Melissa Schessler, President & CEO  1
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Pacific Asia Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge:     (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  November 9, 2007 By:  /s/ Frank C. Ingriselli    Frank C. Ingriselli    President and Chief Executive Officer