alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
July 26, 

### 1948

Mr. Joe Skiles, Business Manager North Texas State Teachers College Denton, Texas Opinion No. 

### v-640

Re: Thelegality of selecting abank as trustee for bondholders of a college revenue bond issue when an officer of the bank is also a memberof the college’s board of resents. Dear Sir: Twoletters, one William L. Kerr, President State Teachers Colleges of opinion of this Department matter. Wehave before us from you and one from Mr. of the Board of Regents, Texas, both request an upon the abmovesubject

^

. acopy 0s tne proposea contract evidencing anagreement by andbetween the Board of Regents of the State Teachers Colleges of Texas for and onbehalf of the North Texas State Teachers College at Denton and Dallas National Bank, Dallas, Texas. The instrument evidences a contract which, in legal effect, makesthe bank anagent or trustee for the benefit of bondholders of certain revenue bond issue and likewise for the benefit of the Board in divers respects, wherein the Board agrees to makeandmaintain certain deposits with the bank andagrees to pay for the bank’s services astipulated monthly sum. The integrity andhonesty of the regent-officer is questioned bynoone. Youare interested solely in the legal principle invalved. This brief general statement of the nature of the contract is sufficient for the purposes of our opinion. It is contrary to the public policy of the State for public officers or boards of the State to makecontracts of the type above mentioned. This is so because such public officers and boards oweto theor. Joe Skiles - Page 2 

### (v-640)

State their unbiased official discretion in the matter of making contracts with others, andespecially free from personal interest adverse to the State. The contract of the Board of Regents, of which Mr. Thomas is amember, with the bank, of which Mr. Thomas is VicePresident, Is in violation of the public policy above mentioned. City of Edinburg v. Ellis (Corn.App.)

### 59S.W. (2d) 

### 99. It is not aquestion of whether qr not the public interest will actually suffer in permitting the particular contract, but it is rather one of asound policy as to official conduct where the lawwill not speculate upon the actualities following its violation. Manyyears ago the Supreme Court reversed the judgment of adistrict judge in acase where hewas distantly related to one of the parties, and sent the cause back for another trial, saying, in its judgment of reversal, that in truth the judge below had decided the case properly.

Acontract between the Board of Regents of the State Teachers Colleges with aNational bankwhereby the bank is to act as agent and trustee for certain bond proceeds andthe Board pays to the bank certain monthly payments andkeeps and maintains certain deposits, is contrary to public policy and should not be made. Yours very truly, ATTORNEY

GENERAL

OFTEXAS

OS:wb Assistant

APPROVED

:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

I, Christopher Y. Chai, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other
certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including any consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008           
|                             
|/s/ Christopher Y. Chai      
|Christopher Y. Chai          
|Chief Financial Officer      
|(Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverdale Mining Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Vladimir Vaskevich, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of November, 2009.



| | VLADIMIR VASKEVICH                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Vladimir Vaskevich                                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

















A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Riverdale Mining Inc. and will be retained by Riverdale Mining Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Samuel E. Williams v. J

- P REI Solutions

, LLC

Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00201

- CV

Trial court case number: 1148091

Trial court: Co unty Civil C our t at Law No

. 1 o f Harris County

A ppellant, Samuel E. Wil liams

, ha s filed a n otice of a ppeal of the trial court’s final o rder signed on February 26, 2020

. H e also has filed a motion to appeal as indigent. The clerk’s

record filed in this Court includes his “ statement o f inability to afford payment of court costs or an appeal bond ” and his “ statement of inability to afford payment of costs to appeal an eviction judgment

. ” See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a), (b) ; see also T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 502.3

. T he record filed in

this Court doe s not r eflect that any motion to require appellant to pay costs or a ny contest to appellant ’ s declaratio n was filed. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P . 145(f)

. Accordingly, t he Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s re cord s that appellant i s allowed to proceed on appeal without payment of costs. See T EX

. R. C IV

. P. 145(a); T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

_________ __ /s/ Russell Lloyd

_____________ Acting individually

Date: April 28, 2020
# Az Európai Unió C 146A/2016

| | ISSN 1977-0979 |
| --- | --- |
| Az Európai Unió
  Hivatalos Lapja | C 146A |
| | |
| Magyar nyelvű kiadás | Tájékoztatások és közlemények | 59. évfolyam2016. április 26. |

ISSN 1977-0979

Az Európai Unió

Hivatalos Lapja

C 146A

Magyar nyelvű kiadás

Tájékoztatások és közlemények

59. évfolyam2016. április 26.

---

| Közleményszám | Tartalom | Oldal |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Hirdetmények |
| | KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK |
| | Számvevőszék |
| 2016/C 146A/01 | Tartaléklista (elért eredmény szerint) — ECA/2015/JUR – két jogászi állás (AD8 — AD 9 besorolási fokozat) — Jogi Szolgálat – Elnökség | 1 |

Közleményszám

Tartalom

Oldal

V   Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Számvevőszék

2016/C 146A/01

Tartaléklista (elért eredmény szerint) — ECA/2015/JUR – két jogászi állás (AD8 — AD 9 besorolási fokozat) — Jogi Szolgálat – Elnökség

1

---

| HU | |
| --- | --- |

HU

---

V Hirdetmények

KÖZIGAZGATÁSI ELJÁRÁSOK

Számvevőszék

| 26.4.2016 | HU | Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja | CA 146/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.4.2016

HU

Az Európai Unió Hivatalos Lapja

CA 146/1

---

TARTALÉKLISTA

(elért eredmény szerint)

ECA/2015/JUR – két jogászi állás (AD8 — AD 9 besorolási fokozat)

Jogi Szolgálat – Elnökség

(2016/C 146 A/01)

Georgios PRANTZOS

Johanne VERMER

Eléonore VON BARDELEBEN

Nunzio BAMBARA

Jan KLEIN

Vassilis KARANTOUNIAS

---
----

|   | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act  of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |      |                                  |   |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   | By:  | /s/ Ross J. Prossner                  |   |
|   |      | Ross J. Prossner                      |   |
|   |      | President and Chief Executive Officer |

|   | By:  | /s/ Lisa M. Jones                                 |   |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |      | Lisa M. Jones                                     |   |
|   |      | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



         In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report") of Farnsworth Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof,  we, Gary
N. Pelehaty,  President and Chief Executive  Officer,  and Charles Alessi,  Vice
President, Chief Financial Officer,  Treasurer and Secretary,  certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date:  12/17/03
       --------


/s/ Gary N. Pelehaty                           /s/ Charles Alessi
--------------------------------------         ---------------------------------
Gary N. Pelehaty                               Charles Alessi
President and Chief Executive Officer          Vice President, Chief Financial
                                               Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
                                               (Principal Financial and
                                               Accounting Officer)
# L_2012077DE.01002402.xml

| 16.3.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 77/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 77/24

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 102/2012 des Rates vom 27. Januar 2012 zur Einführung eines endgültigen Antidumpingzolls auf die Einfuhren von Kabeln und Seilen aus Stahl mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China und der Ukraine, ausgeweitet auf die Einfuhren von aus Marokko, der Republik Moldau und der Republik Korea versandten Kabeln und Seilen aus Stahl, ob als Ursprungserzeugnisse aus diesen Ländern angemeldet oder nicht, im Anschluss an eine Auslaufüberprüfung nach Artikel 11 Absatz 2 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1225/2009 und zur Einstellung des Verfahrens der Auslaufüberprüfung betreffend die Einfuhren von Kabeln und Seilen aus Stahl mit Ursprung in Südafrika nach Artikel 11 Absatz 2 der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1225/2009

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 36 vom 9. Februar 2012
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 36 vom 9. Februar 2012

Auf Seite 15, Artikel 1 Absätze 2 und 3:

anstatt:

„(2)   Der endgültige Antidumpingzollsatz auf den Cites-Nettopreis frei Grenze der Union, unverzollt, der in Absatz 1 beschriebenen Ware mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China beträgt 60,4 %.

(3)   Der endgültige Antidumpingzollsatz auf den Cites-Nettopreis frei Grenze der Union, unverzollt, der in Absatz 1 beschriebenen Ware mit Ursprung in der Ukraine beträgt 51,8 %.“

muss es heißen:

„(2)   Der endgültige Antidumpingzollsatz auf den CIF-Nettopreis frei Grenze der Union, unverzollt, der in Absatz 1 beschriebenen Ware mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China beträgt 60,4 %.

(3)   Der endgültige Antidumpingzollsatz auf den CIF-Nettopreis frei Grenze der Union, unverzollt, der in Absatz 1 beschriebenen Ware mit Ursprung in der Ukraine beträgt 51,8 %.“

---
In The

Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06-13-00170-CR

CLAYTON MARQUIS RICKS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 102nd District Court

Red River County, Texas

Trial Court No. CR01943

Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ.

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Carter
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Clayton Marquis Ricks appeals from his conviction by a jury of the offense of burglary of 

a habitation. Ricks argues that the trial court erred in denying his oral motion for continuance. 

The request for a continuance was prompted by the State’s presentation to defense counsel after 

jury selection, of a written statement made by Ricks. Ricks promptly requested a continuance,

which was denied by the trial court. We find that error was not preserved and affirm the 

judgment of the trial court. 

Ricks’ motion for continuance was read into the record by Ricks’ counsel, but there is 

nothing in the record to suggest that it was written or sworn to by Ricks. The Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals recently reaffirmed that a written, sworn motion for continuance is required by 

statute and that, without such a motion, no error is preserved for appellate review. Blackshear v. 

State, 385 S.W.3d 589, 590–91 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012).

Thus, by failing to file a written, sworn motion requesting a continuance, Ricks forfeited 

his right to challenge the trial court’s denial of a continuance. Id. at 591; Anderson v. State, 301 

S.W.3d 276, 279 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 29.03, 29.08 

(West 2006) (trial court may grant continuance only upon written motion, sworn to by State or 

defendant, setting forth sufficient cause).

Where an issue has not been properly preserved for appeal, the court of appeals may not 

address the merits of that issue. Blackshear, 385 S.W.3d at 591. The contention of error is 

overruled.
3

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Jack Carter

Justice

Date Submitted: May 22, 2014

Date Decided: June 13, 2014

Do Not Publish
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**1341 CA 15-00298**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

MARY DELUCA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TONAWANDA COKE CORPORATION, ESTATE OF J.D. CRANE, DECEASED, MARK KAMHOLZ, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS. (APPEAL NO. 2.)

HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (HUGH M. RUSS, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A., NEW YORK CITY (ALFRED M. ANTHONY OF COUNSEL), COLLINS & COLLINS ATTORNEYS, LLC, BUFFALO, GORDON & GORDON, SPRINGFIELD, NEW JERSEY, AND HOBBIE, CORRIGAN & BERTUCIO, P.C., EATONTOWN, NEW JERSEY, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered January 7, 2015. The order, inter alia, granted in part the motion of plaintiffs for class certification.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in DeLuca v Tonawanda Coke Corp. ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 31, 2015]).

Entered: December 31, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
#### Ellis, Appellant, vs. Hansen, Defendant: Rickard, Respondent.

*January 9*

February *4, 1958.*

*164For the appellant there was a brief by *Eisenberg & Kletske,*attorneys, and *John W. Bernard*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Bernard.*

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by *Giles F. Clark*of Milwaukee.

Beown, J.

The question is whether military service on the part of the alleged tort-feasor tolls the time when the notice of injury prescribed by sec. 330.19 (5), Stats., must be served upon him.

*165As the statute itself declares, its purpose is to protect the alleged tort-feasor against stale claims. Positive authority and persuasive reasons would be necessary to convince us that a person in military service is denied the protection which the statute provides for others not so serving.

The reason which Ellis gives is that Rickard was exempt from civil process while in the army. We have held:

> “The notice required by sec. 330.19 (5), Stats., does not bring anyone within the jurisdiction of a court no matter how served. No action or special proceeding is thereby begun or conducted against anyone. No court acquires jurisdiction over any of the parties thereby. Such a notice may not fall within the definition of legal process.” *Oldenburg v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.*(1954), 266 Wis. 68, 72, 62 N. W. (2d) 574.

So if Ellis is right about a soldier’s immunity to civil process, still a plaintiffs obligation to give notice, which is not process, is unaffected.

But appellant cites no statute or decision which declares that a soldier has such an immunity and we have found none effective at any time applicable to this injury or this action. The Federal Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act, 50 App. USCA, sec. 590, provides only that when process has been served on one in military service that person, in the discretion of the court, may have a stay of proceedings. It appears, then, that Rickard was not immune to civil process, if the notice had been process. Indeed, this action rests on summons and complaint served on Rickard while he was in the army, but later than two years from the event causing the alleged damage.

In *Ausen v. Moriarty*(1954), 268 Wis. 167, 177, 67 N. W. (2d) 358, we held that:

> “The giving of the notice is a material thing. It is made a condition precedent to the maintenance of an action to recover damages.”

*166The present appellant did not comply with the condition precedent. His reasons for not doing so seem to us to be insufficient to toll the statute directing when notice must be given or the complaint actually served. Plis action, then, against Rickard cannot be maintained. The trial court had to dismiss it.

*By the Court.*— -Judgment affirmed.
# L_2011285EN.01000601.xml

| 1.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1098/2011

of 27 October 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (
  Image 1
  (Jinxiang Da Suan) (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the application of the People’s Republic of China to register the name ‘



  (Jinxiang Da Suan)’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Image 2

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 27 October 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 37, 5.2.2011, p. 20.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Image 3
  (Jinxiang Da Suan) (PGI)

---