alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011122EN.01006901.xml

| 11.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/69 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 122/69

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 450/2011

of 10 May 2011

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 of 21 December 2007 laying down implementing rules for Council Regulations (EC) No 2200/96, (EC) No 2201/96 and (EC) No 1182/2007 in the fruit and vegetable sector (2), and in particular Article 138(1) thereof,

Whereas:

Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XV, Part A thereto,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 138 of Regulation (EC) No 1580/2007 are fixed in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 May 2011.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 350, 31.12.2007, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | JO | 78,3 |
| MA | 46,2 |
| TN | 107,9 |
| TR | 82,0 |
| ZZ | 78,6 |
| 0707 00 05 | TR | 76,8 |
| ZZ | 76,8 |
| 0709 90 70 | MA | 86,8 |
| TR | 123,0 |
| ZZ | 104,9 |
| 0709 90 80 | EC | 27,0 |
| ZZ | 27,0 |
| 0805 10 20 | EG | 51,1 |
| IL | 59,9 |
| MA | 47,9 |
| TN | 54,9 |
| TR | 72,0 |
| ZZ | 57,2 |
| 0805 50 10 | TR | 49,8 |
| ZZ | 49,8 |
| 0808 10 80 | AR | 68,7 |
| BR | 72,9 |
| CA | 107,1 |
| CL | 82,9 |
| CN | 102,2 |
| NZ | 116,8 |
| US | 143,8 |
| UY | 71,0 |
| ZA | 76,2 |
| ZZ | 93,5 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

JO

78,3

MA

46,2

TN

107,9

TR

82,0

ZZ

78,6

0707 00 05

TR

76,8

ZZ

76,8

0709 90 70

MA

86,8

TR

123,0

ZZ

104,9

0709 90 80

EC

27,0

ZZ

27,0

0805 10 20

EG

51,1

IL

59,9

MA

47,9

TN

54,9

TR

72,0

ZZ

57,2

0805 50 10

TR

49,8

ZZ

49,8

0808 10 80

AR

68,7

BR

72,9

CA

107,1

CL

82,9

CN

102,2

NZ

116,8

US

143,8

UY

71,0

ZA

76,2

ZZ

93,5

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report ofSterling Oil and Gas Company(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period end ofNovember 30, 2008as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,Richard G. Stifel,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 9th day of January, 2009.                                                                                                                 
|   

RICHARD G. STIFELRichard G. StifelChief Financial Officer





















---
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Service Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Dana S. Philbrook, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to his best knowledge:





|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




By:

/s/ DANA S. PHILBROOKDana S. Philbrook Chief
Financial Officer





Date: September 13, 2002
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. § 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of CAMAC Energy Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Abiola L. Lawal, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











August 9, 2010
By:
/s/ Abiola L. LawalName: Abiola L. LawalTitle: Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Asia Petroleum, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
F. Groth, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/
Stephen F.
Groth


Stephen
F. Groth


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer


May 11,
2009
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3145

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the treatment under

the tax-exempt bond rules of prepayments for certain commodities.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 2 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify

the treatment under the tax-exempt bond rules of prepayments for certain commodities.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Municipal Utility Fair5 ness Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. ARBITRAGE RULES NOT TO APPLY TO PREPAY7 MENTS FOR NATURAL GAS AND OTHER COM8 MODITIES.

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (b) of section 148 of

10 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining higher yield-
2

•S 3145 IS

1 ing investments) is amended by adding at the end the fol2 lowing new paragraph:

3 ‘‘(4) EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN PREPAYMENTS

4 TO ENSURE COMMODITY SUPPLY.—The term ‘invest5 ment property’ shall not include a prepayment by an

6 issuer of bonds in order to ensure the supply of a

7 commodity necessary to, and used in a business of,

8 a governmental unit.’’

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

10 this section shall take effect as if included in the amend11 ments made by section 1301 of the Tax Reform Act of

12 1986.

Æ
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of TechniScan, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David C. Robinson, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of myknowledge and belief, that:

 

(1)          the Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          the information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ DAVID C. ROBINSON   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
| David C. Robinson       |   |
| Chief Executive Officer |   |
|                    |   |
| Date: May 4, 2010  |   |

 

----
# Kiski Valley Water Pollution Control Authority 1361 SCHOOL ROAD • LEECHBURG PA 15656 PHONE: (724) 568-3655 FAX: (724) 568-3554

April 21, 2011
Mr. Timothy R. Dobrosky McCutcheon Enterprises, Inc. 250 Park Road Apollo, PA 15613 Dear Mr. Dobrosky:
In response tothe Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection's requestto gasdrillers to cease by May 19, 2011, delivering wastewaterfrom shale gas extraction towastewatertreatmentfacilities, you are hereby ordered to cease all discharges ofthis nature to the Kiski ValleyWater Pollution Control Authority's treatment plant by May 19, 2011. Ifyou have any questions regarding this directive, please contact me at 724-568- 3655.

cc: Mr. Samuel Harper, PADEP Mr. Ronald Furlan, PADEP Mr. John Lovell, USEPA
Exhibit
32.1











CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Lake Victoria Mining
Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period end of
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date here of (the "report"), I, Roger A. Newell, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated this 20th day
of November, 2009.








ROGER A.
      NEWELLRoger
      A. NewellChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer
| $10,000.00 | August 31, 2009 |
|------------|-----------------|

 

**PROMISSORY NOTE**

 

As hereinafter agreed, Wasatch Food Services, Inc., jointly and severally, promises to pay to the order of Hobble Creek Investments, Inc., *Ten Thousand Dollars and no cents* ($10,000.00).  And it is hereby agreed that said amount $10,000 shall be payable upon demand.  Interest shall accrue at the rate of *Eight Percent* (8%) per annum will be charged on the unpaid balance until the whole amount of the principal and interest is paid.  There shall be no penalty for early payment of this note.  

 

Should default be made in the payment of the demand note then the whole unpaid amount shall become immediately due and payable; and in the event default is made and said note is placed in the hands of an attorney for collection or suit is brought on the same, the undersigned agrees to pay all costs and attorney’s fees that might be incurred.  If there is a lawsuit, borrower agrees upon lenders request to submit to the jurisdiction of the county of Utah County, the State of Utah.  This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Utah.

 

 

**UNDERSIGNED:**

***Ben Peay***

 

|   | /s/ Ben Peay |
|--------|--------------|

Ben Peay, President

Wasatch Food Services, Inc.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001063530
<NAME>                        Surgical Safety Products, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. Currency

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Jan-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   Dec-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         516,799
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  17,086
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               652,454
<PP&E>                                         203,533
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,276,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          590,557
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       14,516
<OTHER-SE>                                     35,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,276,106
<SALES>                                        0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               174,983
<CGS>                                          1,025,625
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,214,424
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               309,028
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             257,747
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,039,441)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,039,441)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (0.091)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
Independent Auditor's Consent

The Board of Directors
CNY Financial Corporation:

We consent to  incorporation  by reference  in the  registration  statement  No.
333-69585 on Form S-8 of CNY Financial  Corporation  of our report dated January
14,  2000,  relating  to  the  consolidated  balance  sheets  of  CNY  Financial
Corporation  and  subsidiary  as of December 31, 1999 and 1998,  and the related
consolidated  statements  of  income,  stockholders'  equity  and  comprehensive
income,  and cash  flows for each of the years in the  three-year  period  ended
December  31,  1999,  which  report has been  included in the  December 31, 1999
Annual Report on Form 10-K of CNY Financial Corporation.


/s/ KPMG LLP
-------------


Syracuse, New York
March 24, 2000
#### Mary Deltufo *vs.*Michaelangelo Morganelli.

February 9, 1939.

*R. J. Hartford,*for the plaintiff, submitted a brief.

*G. B. Rowell,*for the defendant.

Exceptions overruled. Direction of a verdict for the defendant on the plaintiff's opening was not error. There is nothing in the record to indicate that the plaintiff in making the opening "did not make a complete statement of all facts and inference of facts within his knowledge.” *First National Bank of Bridgeport*v. *Groves,*269 Mass. 161, 165. *Sandler*v. *Green,*287 Mass. 404, 406. The plaintiff, according to the opening statement, was a social guest — a licensee — and consequently could not recover on the first count alleging ordinary negligence. *Comeau*v. *Comeau,*285 Mass. 578. Gross negligence as alleged in the second count is not shown by the statement. Nor is any ground shown for recovery under the third count alleging statutory violation and public nuisance. See *Comeau*v. *Comeau,*285 Mass. 578; *Garland*v. *Stetson,*292 Mass. 95, 101-102; *Wynn*v. *Sullivan,*294 Mass. 562, 565; *Aldworth*v. *F. W. Woolworth Co.*295 Mass. 344, 347.
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Secure America Acquisition Corporation
(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, C.
Thomas McMillen, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1) The
report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  August
      14, 2009
                    
                    /s/
      C. Thomas McMillenC.
      Thomas McMillenPrincipal
      Executive Officer
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 21

- 00147

- CV

In re Jennifer Jo Bird, individually, and as Former Trustee of the Carl C. Anderson, Sr.

and Marie Jo Anderson Family Trust FBO Jennifer Jo Bird

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS C OUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________

Thomas J. Baker , Justice

Before Chie f Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Filed: September 10 , 2021
Exhibit
99.9

SRK Consulting
(Canada) Inc.
1500, 155
University Avenue
Toronto, Ontario,
Canada
M5H
3B7

T:
+1.416.601.1445
F:
+1.416.601.9046

toronto@srk.com
www.srk.com














CONSENT








Ladies
and Gentlemen:








The
undersigned company hereby consents to (1) the references to the
undersigned company’s name included or incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp.
in connection with (a) the report entitled “Technical Report
with an Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Wheeler River
Property, Northern Saskatchewan, Canada” dated March 15,
2018, (b) the report entitled “Technical Report with an
Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Midwest Property,
Northern Saskatchewan, Canada” dated March 26, 2018, and (2)
all other references to the undersigned company included or
incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of
Denison Mines Corp.








Dated:
March 28, 2018

















SRK
CONSULTING (CANADA) INC.














(Signed)
“Glen
Cole”


___________________________


Glen
Cole, PGeo.


SRK
Consulting (Canada) Inc.


Local
Offices:
Saskatoon
Sudbury
Toronto
Vancouver
Yellowknife
Group
Offices:
Africa
Asia
Australia
Europe
North
America
South
America
#### Howard, Respondent, vs. Howard, Appellant.

*March 7*

April *5, 1955.*

*337For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by *Vaughn S. Conway*of Baraboo.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by *John U. Dithmar,*divorce counsel of Sauk county.

Gehl, J.

We have set forth above a complete and somewhat detailed statement of everything which the record discloses has happened in the trial court since the entry of the divorce decree and prior to the date of the last-referred-to order, May 12, 1954. The defendant appeals from this order. Attached to the notice of appeal is an affidavit of the defendant which recites certain facts which do not appear of record.

On May 20, 1954, there was filed with the clerk of court an affidavit of the divorce counsel which also sets forth certain facts which do not appear of record. On May 28, 1954, the county judge made an order which purports to make the latter affidavit a part of the record.

The affidavits of defendant’s counsel and the divorce counsel, made and filed after the entry of the order appealed from and not made a part of the bill of exceptions, did not become a part of the record in the case. Consequently, we may not consider them. *Finney v. Guy,*111 Wis. 296, 87 N. W. 255; *Shortle v. Sheill,*172 Wis. 53, 178 N. W. 304; 3 Am. Jur., Appeal and Error, p. 224, sec. 592.

It is necessary for us to consider only one of defendant’s contentions: That he was denied the opportunity to show that his failure to pay was not attributable to his fault. We have quoted in full the record and the proceedings had on May 11, 1954, to demonstrate that defendant was given no such opportunity. A refusal to pay in accordance with the provisions of a divorce decree is contumacious only when it is brought about wilfully and with intent to avoid payment. Imprisonment should not be ordered when it is made to appear that the default is the result of inability to pay. *338
      *Staples v. Staples,*87 Wis. 592, 58 N. W. 1036; *Razall v. Razall,*242 Wis. 121, 7 N. W. (2d) 417. The record is in such state *that*this essential finding could not have been made. It was not made.

If there were any doubt that it was not intended that defendant be given an opportunity to show that his default resulted from his inability to pay it is removed by the fact that in the bench warrant prepared even before he was taken into custody it is recited that defendant “is in contempt of court.” The order was erroneously made.

It may very well be that defendant has been guilty of wil-fully refusing to comply with the court’s order. In fact, there is enough in the record to suggest that he may have been. The suggestion does not suffice, however, to permit the court to find him guilty and order his imprisonment without first granting to him the right to explain, if he can, that his failure to pay has been caused by his inability to do so.

*By the Court.*— Order reversed.