alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-   

# Physics Division

The Physics Division builds on ORNL strengths to perform outstanding leadership research for the Nation in nuclear science, isotopes, and related areas. Our focus is in the areas of Fundamental Symmetries, Nuclear Structure Physics, Nuclear Astrophysics, Heavy Ion Collisions, and Isotope R&D and Production. 

**Our mission: To understand the structure, evolution and interactions of the fundamental constituents of the universe through experimental and theoretical research along with solving practical problems to advance the interests of the nation and the world.**

Through a combination of frontier measurements and world-leading theory, we address questions of critical importance in the basic and applied research communities. Some examples: our measurement of the electric dipole moment of the neutron (nEDM) at the SNS will help solve the riddle of the balance of matter and antimatter in the Universe; our measurement of neutrino-less double beta decay in deep underground labs will help define the New Standard Model; our simulations on the FRONTIER supercomputer of subatomic nuclei are leading to new insights on the quantum many-body problem; our measurements of heavy ion collisions at the most powerful accelerator labs probes the state of the quark-gluon plasma thought to exist in the early Universe; our production of rare and radioactive samples are used to diagnose and treat cancers as well as to create Tennessine, one of the heaviest elements in the periodic table; our measurements with beams of neutron-rich unstable nuclei probe the properties of exotic nuclei as well as the production of these nuclei in neutron-star mergers and core-collapse supernovae; and our state-of-the-art 3D simulations of these supernovae are redefining our knowledge of these catastrophic stellar events that create and disperse the elements of life. 

For these studies, our researchers are developing detectors with breakthrough technologies that have spinoffs in national security, nuclear medicine, and related fields, as well as software techniques that are relevant for quantum computing and hydrodynamic flows.

### Contact

MarcelW Demarteau

demarteau@ornl.gov

## Current Research

## News

Caroline Nesaraja: Providing nothing but the best nuclear data

## News

Compelling evidence of neutrino process opens physics possibilities

## News

Welcome to Neutrino Alley: Q&A with ORNL’s Marcel Demarteau

## News

Righting a wrong, nuclear physicists improve precision of neutrino studies

## Current Research

## News

Quantum on the Quad facilitates lab-wide strategy sessions 

## News

Hix, Lajoie elected Fellows of the American Physical Society

## News

ORNL is poised to have a major role in the future of nuclear physics

## News

From atomic nuclei to astrophysics, collaborative program builds basis for scientific discoveries
**Exhibit10.24**

 

**2005Annual Incentive Plan Summary**

 

On December 30, 2004, the Board ofDirectors approved the Company’s 2005 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP).  The AIP is established each year to provide abonus to participants based on the Company’s achievement of annual corporateperformance goals.  Participants in theplan are recommended by management and approved by the Board of Directors andgenerally include the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President and ChiefOperating Officer, Chief Financial Officer and other executive officers withmanagement authority over the corporate functions responsible for theachievement of the goals.  The bonusearned by each participant will be equal to a fixed percentage of the participant’ssalary multiplied by the percentage of achievement of the annual corporateperformance goals, as determined by the Board of Directors.  The goals are based upon the following fourmetrics:  (i) revenue growth as comparedto industry growth, weighted 30%; (ii) profitability improvement over 2004;weighted 20%; (iii) orders derived from the front end of the microelectronicmanufacturing process, weighted 35%; and (iv) free cash flow, weighted15%.  The bonus earned is paid uponpublic release of the Company’s annual results.

 

----
Exhibit 32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002) In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bow Valley Ventures, Inc.. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard Hiron, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Richard HironRichard HironChief Executive Officer & Principal Accounting OfficerApril 19, 2010 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
p. 1 

33y g al 

;7 

I E APR 20 "N 6: 02 

Date: April 13, 2011 

OFpl-2D77-p.~3/ 

A'G`6FA 

I see more I do more I 

.d 

To : Document Control Office (DCO) (7407M), 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), 

Environmental Protection Agency, 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave ., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001 

ATTN : TSCA Section 4 . 

Subject: Letter of Exemption of Chemical sodium glucoheptonate, CAS#31138-

65-5, Docket ID # EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

After reviewing the 2006 IUR submission for Agfa Coorporation, 100 Challenger 

Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660, it was noted that there was a calculation error 

for the. submission of chemical sodium glucoheptonate, CAS#31138-65-5. The 

amount reported was 270,684 pounds . This is actually the total quantity of all the 

products that sodium glucoheptonate is contained in . The correct 2005 imported 

quantity of sodium glucoheptonate, CAS# 31138-65-5 by Agfa Corporation is 

only 2066 pounds . 

Agfa Corporation has not used the chemical sodium glucoheptonate, CAS# 

31138-65-5 since June of 2009 and Agfa does not intend to use sodium 

glucoheptonate in the near future. It is for this reason Agfa Corporation requests 

an exemption for any required testing of sodium glucoheptonate, CAS# 31138-

65-5. 

I understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period 

described in section 4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, I must pay fair and equitable 

reimbursement to the person or persons who incurred or shared in the costs of 

complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting 

of my application was based . 

If you have any further question, feel free to contact me which I may be of 

assistance with. 

Sincefel 

chael Patrick 

Product Safety Coordinator Agfa Corporation 

50 Meister Avenue 

Somerville, NJ 08876 

(908)231-5261 

mike . patrick(aD-agfa .com 

IIIIII,IIIIIVIYINIIII61~111111161u11,11~7 lllll 

CONTAINS NO CBI 
0 

a 

UJ 

O 

Q 

CO 

N 

Or 

Ln 

rQ 

N 

r- - 

c 

a) 0~0 

C O 

Z 

CO 

Q 

p, 6 N 

0 U5 

d 

.5 E 

U-) CO 

1-4 

a
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**310 CA 14-01598**  PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ.

MICHAEL STEBICK, RONALD R. ANASTASIA AND JEFFREY R. ANASTASIA, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

V ORDER

RITA MCGEE, KATHLEEN HOWARD, PATRICIA L. HUSTED, SANDRA L. KIBODEAUX AND SHARON E. PAULY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

COLLIGAN LAW LLP, BUFFALO (A. NICHOLAS FALKIDES OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
WAGNER & HART, LLP, OLEAN (JANINE FODOR OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County (Michael L. Nenno, A.J.), entered June 30, 2014. The order granted the motion of defendants for leave to file an interlocutory appeal.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Entered: March 20, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Source Categories

Emissions 

(tons/yr) %

Cumulative 

%

Agricultural Chemicals and Pesticides 1.30E-01 13.16 13.16

Chemical Preparations 1.30E-02 1.32 14.47

Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production [1] 3.00E-02 3.04 17.51

Guided Missiles and Space Vehicles Manufacturing 5.00E-03 0.51 18.01

Industrial Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing 2.50E-01 25.30 43.31

Industrial Organic Chemicals Manufacturing 5.05E-01 51.11 94.42

Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (MON) 4.37E-02 4.42 98.84

Pharmaceuticals Production 1.95E-03 0.20 99.04

Plastic Materials and Resins Manufacturing [2] 9.50E-03 0.96 100.00

Total Emissions 0.99 100.00

Foot Notes

[1] Cyclic Crude and Intermediate Production was titled Cyclic 

Crude and Intermediate Production (not subject to petroleum 

refining MACT) in the May 1999 Report

[2] Plastics Materials and Resins Manufacturing (Nov. 2002 

Inventory) was titled Polymers and Resins (I,II,IV) in the May 

1999 Report

Hydrazine
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3226 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3226

     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend for an 
   additional 3 years the special immigrant religious worker program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 19 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

   Mr. Hatch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to extend for an 
   additional 3 years the special immigrant religious worker program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Religious Workers Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. 3-YEAR EXTENSION OF SPECIAL IMMIGRANT RELIGIOUS WORKER PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking 
``2000,'' each place it appears and inserting ``2003,''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
take effect on October 1, 2000.
                                 <all>
```
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Kenroy Romain, Also Known as Calvin Romain, Appellant.

[772 NYS2d 875]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Khipel, J.), rendered November 29, 2001, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, attempted assault in the first degree (three counts), assault in the second degree (four counts), assault in the third degree (four counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacat*612ing the convictions of assault in the third degree under counts 10 through 13 of the indictment, vacating the sentences imposed thereon, and dismissing those counts of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant failed to preserve his contention that the court gave an insufficient jury charge with respect to a witness’s admission on the stand that he previously testified falsely (see *People v Leisner,*73 NY2d 140 [1989]; *People v Whalen,*59 NY2d 273 [1983]; *People v Bishop,*144 AD2d 476 [1988]). In any event, this contention is without merit because the charge, in its entirety, adequately conveyed to the jury that in assessing the witness’s credibility, it must consider his admission that he lied under oath (see *People v Coleman,*70 NY2d 817 [1987]; *People v Knight,*261 AD2d 487 [1999]; *People v Wilson,*210 AD2d 363 [1994]; *People v Owens,*202 AD2d 341 [1994]; *People v Calderon,*182 AD2d 770 [1992]). In addition, the defendant failed to preserve his contention regarding the propriety of the trial court’s resubmission of the attempted assault in the first degree counts to the jury (see CPL 470.05 [2]; *People v Flowers,*274 AD2d 523 [2000]; *People v Alicea,*201 AD2d 575 [1994]; *People v Quilles,*48 AD2d 933 [1975]). In any event, the court’s resubmission of those counts was justified by the jury’s confusion and inconsistency with respect to the other assault counts (see CPL 310.50 [2]; *People v Salemmo,*38 NY2d 357 [1976]; *People v Greenfield,*70 AD2d 662 [1979]; *People v Quilles, supra).*

As correctly conceded by the People, the counts of assault in the third degree constituted lesser-included offenses of the counts of assault in the second degree (see *People v Rosales,*303 AD2d 769 [2003]; *People v Jones,*277 AD2d 329 [2000]). Thus, we vacate the convictions on those lesser-included offenses and the sentences imposed thereon and we dismiss those counts of the indictment (see *People v Lee,*39 NY2d 388, 390 [1976]; *People v Garofalo,*192 AD2d 619 [1993]; *People v Butler,*192 AD2d 543 [1993]). Krausman, J.P., Schmidt, Cozier and Mastro, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  Certification

I, Richard F. Bennett, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Gouverneur Bancorp,
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in the report, fairly present in all material respects
     the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
     business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
     responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the small business issuer and we have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
     is being prepared;

     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
     internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small
     business issuer's second fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
     reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting; and

5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
     disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
     financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
     committee of small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
     performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
     likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
     process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting.

DATE:  December 19, 2005

/s/ RICHARD F. BENNETT
-------------------------
RICHARD F. BENNETT
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




In
connection with the accompanying Annual Report of Ultimate Escapes, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (the
“Report”), I, Philip Callaghan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
hereby certify that to my knowledge:




(1)
            The Report fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The information contained in the
      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of the
  Companies.




Dated:
      May 13, 2010
              
              /s/    Philip
      CallaghanPhilip
      Callaghan
                Chief
      Financial Officer




The above
certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and is not being filed as part
of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
r 

U.S.o.port,_,t of Transportation 

Q~f,c:e or rr.e Secr'!!'Jr;:or T!o~soo··::"OI'I 

Chief. Documentary Services Div. 

Depanment of Transportation 

Washington. D.C. 20590 

TAM-Linhas Aereas S.A. 

DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR 

SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS 

DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS 

ATTENTION: DOCKET SECTION. C-55 

(Name of Company. please print) 

. having irs principal 

office at lo500 !\)W 1 Hturni ......, I I L- 33t 2 2. . (Address) 

hereby de!»ignates. pursuilnl to !'>ection 46103 of Title .f9 of the U.S. Code 1fom1erly ~ection 1005!bl of the Fedeml A\ iation Act 

of 1958. a:. amendedJ the per!\on named bt:-lou as it' Agent upon whom ~en·ice of all notice~ and pro~.:e:-.~: unc.J all Ndi:r-~. deci~ion-.. 

::md requirements or the Depa11ment of· Transportation may be made for and on beh:Jir of ~aid c .. uTier. hereby canceling ull pn:viou:-. 

de~ignations of agent~ made by it to the DOT. 

Charles F. Donley II, charles.donley@squirepb.com, 1-202-626-6~40 Name of Agent--------------~~------------~~~--~----~----------~------

.. (Please Print) 

1200 19th Street, N.W., Suite 300, Washington, D.C. 20036 

Address ~~~~--------~----~--------~------~--~-----------------------

The Agenc so designated has written his name and also his initials in the following space: 

Name~j~l[ (Initials) __ ..~,t"-..!.#/..c.::. ______ ___ 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF. TAM-Linhas Aereas S.A. ---------------------------------------------- has caused these 

(Name of Company) 

presents to be signed in its name by ___ l-t:t...!.l~b~lo,;____:C.::::.n~i0::.Z~2:..::0::__ ________ . Pre•ident 

A-!1Dr~ In Faa-t' (Please Print) 

of said company. and to be attested under its corporate seal by 

(Secretary. or other Title) 

on chis l \.Q.j-h day of ::RtnuCI.rlj 19 2015 

TAM-Linhas Aereas SA 

ATTEST: 

(Secretary. or other officer) 

OST F 1010.5 (1-95)
BG

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. OP 22-0470

COY YARBER, 

Petitioner,

v.

JAMES SALMONSEN, Warden, 

Respondent.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Respondent’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Respondent is granted an extension of time 

to and including February 13, 2023, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 9 2023

01/09/2023

Case Number: OP 22-0470
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.3

SUBSIDIARIES OF VERIDIEN CORPORATION

         A)       Rost Inc. - incorporated in Florida (dormant)
         B)       Rost Medical Development, Inc. - incorporated in Delaware
                    (dormant)
         C)       Marquit Manufacturing Specialties, Inc. - incorporated in
                    Delaware (dormant)
         D)       Veridien.com Inc. - incorporated in Delaware (dormant)
         E)       Norpak (U.S.), Inc. - incorporated in Delaware
         F)       The SunSwipe Corporation, L.L.C. - incorporated in Delaware
         G)       Communications Gear, Inc. - incorporated in Delaware (dormant)


The above-named subsidiaries conduct business solely under the above-mentioned
names.
OFFICE At>OJu: ss 12 5 Access Road \or\\' oo d. ivlt\ 02062 February 22.2013 

## Norwood MemorialAirport Russ Maguire. A. AL. AC E. Airport Manager

Boston Executive Helicopters Attn: Chris Donovan. President 125 Access Road Norwood. MA 02062 RE: Approval of Assignment, Assumption and Amendment of Lease Dear Chris: i\IAJLJ:\(; AnOJu: s!-1 125 Acccss Road

**~urwood.** MA

**0206~**

On behalf of the Norwood Airport Commission ( AC) : Following a review by FAA and the Massachusetts Department of Transportation. of Bnston Executive Helicopters· assignment, assumption and amendment of lease , this document was approved by the NAC at its public meeting on February 13.2013 . Sincerely,



### -- **~** 

# /)v)e--< .

Russ Maguire.



# Manage~ Norwood Memorial Airport


### CC: Norwood Airport Commission. 1 Vorwood Toll'n Counsel

Phone : { 7X I) 255-561 6 1 F ax: (781 )255-5617 1 nnngui re (lt norwoodma.gov