alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 307

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate the budget

neutrality adjustment factor used in calculating the blended capitation

rate for Medicare+Choice organizations.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 26, 1999

Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. SMITH of Oregon) introduced the following

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to eliminate

the budget neutrality adjustment factor used in calculating the blended capitation rate for Medicare+Choice organizations.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Medicare+Choice Pay5 ment Equity Act of 1999’’.
2

•S 307 IS

1 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF BUDGET NEUTRALITY ADJUST2 MENT FACTOR IN CALCULATING THE BLEND3 ED CAPITATION RATE FOR

4 MEDICARE+CHOICE ORGANIZATIONS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1853(c) of the Social Se6 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–23(c)) is amended—

7 (1) in paragraph (1)(A), by striking the comma

8 at the end of clause (ii) and all that follows before

9 the period at the end; and

10 (2) by striking paragraph (5) and redesignating

11 paragraphs (6) and (7) as paragraphs (5) and (6)

12 respectively.

13 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Part C of title

14 XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–21

15 et seq.) is amended—

16 (1) in section 1853(c)—

17 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph

18 (A) of paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘(6)(C) and

19 (7)’’ and inserting ‘‘(5)(C) and (6)’’; and

20 (B) in paragraphs (1)(B)(ii) and (3)(A)(i),

21 by striking ‘‘(6)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘(5)(A)’’;

22 and

23 (2) in subsections (b)(3)(B)(ii) and (c)(3) of

24 section 1859, by striking ‘‘1853(c)(6)’’ and inserting

25 ‘‘1853(c)(5)’’.
3

•S 307 IS

1 (c) SUBMISSION TO CONGRESS.—Not later than 20

2 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

3 of Health and Human Services shall submit to Congress

4 a legislative proposal that provides for aggregate decreases

5 in Federal expenditures under the medicare program

6 under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

7 1395 et seq.) as are equal to the aggregate increases in

8 such expenditures under such program resulting from the

9 amendments to the Social Security Act made by sub10 sections (a) and (b).

11 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

12 this section shall apply to payments made for periods be13 ginning on or after January 1, 2000.

Æ
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 18 (Thursday, January 27, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 4864]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-1799]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the Utah Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and the regulations 
of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a meeting of the 
Utah Advisory Committee will convene at 6 p.m. and adjourn at 7:30 p.m. 
(MST) on Thursday, February 24, 2011 at the City and County Building, 
451 South State Street, Cannon Room 335, Salt Lake City, UT 84111. The 
purpose of the meeting is for the committee to discuss recent 
Commission and regional activities, discuss current civil rights issues 
in the State and plan future activities that include a civil rights 
resource directory, immigration, and issues affecting minority students 
as it prepares to select a project topic.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the 
comments must be received in the regional office by March 24, 2011. The 
address is Rocky Mountain Regional Office, 999-18th Street, Suite 
1380S, Denver, CO 80202. Persons wishing to e-mail their comments, or 
who desire additional information should contact Malee Craft, Regional 
Director, at 303-866-1040 or by e-mail to: mcraft@usccr.gov.
    Hearing-impaired persons who will attend the meeting and require 
the services of a sign language interpreter should contact the Regional 
Office at least ten (10) working days before the scheduled date of the 
meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Rocky Mountain Regional Office, as they become available, both 
before and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this 
advisory committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
http://www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Rocky Mountain Regional Office 
at the above e-mail or street address.
    The meeting will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

    Dated in Washington, DC on January 24, 2011.
Peter Minarik,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2011-1799 Filed 1-26-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
HALEY BARB01; R 

CCrVERNOR 

STATE OF MISSISSIPPI :iSSig, 

OFRCE OF THE GOVERNOR : CKET QPERATlONf; 

2DI0 OCT - I A 10: 2 2 

August 24,2010 

Honorable Raymond LaHood 

Secretaiy of Transportation 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

RE: Docket DOT-OST-2010-0124 

Dear Mr. Secretary, 

1 am writing in support of the Small Community Air Service Grant application being submitted 

by the Jackson Municipal Airport Authority. 

The Jackson Municipal Airport is located in Jackson, Mississippi, and provides essential air 

service for state government and regional businesses. The Authority will use this funding for 

marketing efforts to better inform the local community of the services offered by the airport and 

to educate the airlines that currently provide service to the region about our needs. 

The Jackson Municipal Airport Authority is working diligently to match the needs of central 

Mississippi with current and potential services available by airlines, I am hopefiil you will give 

their proposal your strongest consideration. 

POST OFFICE BOX 139 • JACKSON. MISSISSIPPI 39205 • TEL (601) 359-3150 • FAX (601) 359-3741 • www.govCTnoTbarhour.com
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

March 28, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131822 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. SOUTHFIELD JEEP, INC., d/b/a SOUTHFIELD Stephen J. Markman, CHRYSLER-PLYMOUTH-JEEP, Justices Plaintiff/Counter DefendantAppellee, 

v SC: 131822 

 COA: 256014 

Macomb CC: 03-002718-CK 

39th DC: 01-000684-GC 

PREFERRED AUTO SALES, INC., and MARK 

ARMENI, 

Defendants/Counter PlaintiffsAppellants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 29, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE in part the judgment of the Court of 

Appeals. The Court of Appeals erred in finding that the defendant’s failure to appeal the 

district court’s denial of its motion to transfer the case to the circuit court leads to the 

conclusion that defendant either acquiesced in the district court’s decision that the 

damages did not exceed the jurisdictional limit, or chose to forfeit any amount in excess 

of the jurisdictional limit of the district court. Slip op, p 7. Because the district court’s 

denial of the defendant’s motion was interlocutory, the defendant may appeal that 

decision as of right, on entry of a final order by the district court disposing of the case. 

See People v Torres, 452 Mich 43, 59 (1996) (“[A] party in a civil action may raise 

previous interlocutory decisions when it brings an appeal of right from a final order.”); 

MCR Subchapter 7.100 of the Michigan Court Rules. In all other respects, leave to 

appeal is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should now 

be reviewed by this Court. 

s0321 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

March 28, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Prosperous Clean Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Ben Wang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906        of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                    |   |                              |
|-------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                    |   |                              |
| Date: November 11, 2009 |   | /s/ Ben Wang                      |
|                    |   | Ben Wang

Chief Financial Officer |
|                    |   |                              |
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated October 3, 2012, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated October 8, 2012, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2012-4US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Karleen Munns, am a Director of Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited (the Servicer).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the period from April 1, 2013 through March 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been
made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 25 June 2014



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Karleen Munns            
|Karleen Munns Director       
|                             
|Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186894) pertaining to Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186894) and Amendment No. 423 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP









Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
* P ursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________
No. 97-51060 Summary Calendar

_____________________

JOHNNY RAY SEATON

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ, Chairman,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. A-97-CV-467

October 23, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Johnny Ray Seaton appeals the dismissal without prejudice of

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. (Seaton’s motion for

appointment of appellate counsel is DENIED .) The district court

determined that Seaton had failed to comply with a court order, see

F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 41(b), that he pay the $5 initial partial filing

fee. Seaton has presented evidence indicating that he authorized

the payment of that fee from his inmate trust fund account on 3- 2 -

July 1997, in compliance with Texas Department of Criminal Justice

procedures. S ee Morrow v. Collins

, 111 F.3d 374, 376 (5th cir.

1 997). Under these circumstances, the district court abused its

discretion in dismissing the action. S ee Smith v. Martinez

, 706

F.2d 572, 573-74 (5th Cir. 1983).

VACATED AND REMANDED; MOTION DENIED
#### Charles E. Keck, Plaintiff, *v.*Charles B. Saxon, Inc., and Others, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 1, 1937.

*James E. Whalen,*for the plaintiff.

*Sidney M. Wittner,*for defendants Charles B. Saxon, Inc., and United States Guarantee Co.

*John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney-General,*for the State.

Callahan, J.

Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. The plaintiff, a sculptor, designed and made a plaster model for a group furnished to the defendant to be used in guiding stonecutters employed in constructing a pediment over the entrance of a building being erected by defendant Charles B. Saxon, Inc., as general contractor.

Defendant contends that the plaintiff has no lien for the reason that the work furnished was not an improvement within section *183 of the Lien Law. That section provides that a *“*contractor, sub-contractor, laborer or materialman, who performs labor or furnishes materials for the improvement of real property * * * shall have a lien.” Section *2*of the same statute defines improvement to include the *“*erection, alteration or repair of any * * * real property and any work done upon such property or materials furnished for its permanent improvement.”

Defendant contends that the model group made by the sculptor does not come within the improvements thus defined.

While it is true that the plaster model did not of itself become a part of the structure, a replica thereof was cut into the stone and it seems to me that when this was done the group and the labor or artistry which it represents became a part of the improvement and came within the meaning of the statute. The Lien Law should receive a liberal construction. *(Shultz*v. *Quereau Co.,*210 N. Y. 257.)

This case is to be distinguished from those where tools and appliances are used on construction work. Such articles do not go into the improvement of the real property. They are merely part of the contractor’s plant used in doing the work.

Judgment for plaintiff fixing his lien at the sum of $450, with interest and costs. Submit findings.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-34-2024]

On June 11, 2024, Catalent Pharma Solutions, LLC, submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility within FTZ 29, in Winchester, Kentucky.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (89 FR 52022, June 21, 2024). On October 9, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: October 9, 2024.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-23754 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 31.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Walter J. Thomsen, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Proteo, Inc. And
Subsidiary (the "registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to me by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
report was being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report; and

c) presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;

d) disclosed in this report any changes in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter, in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonable
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls over
financial reporting.

DATE:  MARCH 31, 2005                              BY: /S/ WALTER J. THOMSEN
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       WALTER J. THOMSEN
                                                       CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 32
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     The undersigned hereby certifies, in her capacity as an officer of Proteo,
Inc. (the "Company"), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her
knowledge:

(1) the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


Date: March 31, 2006


/s/ Birge Bargmann
-------------------------------
Birge Bargmann
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer


A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO PROTEO, INC. AND WILL BE RETAINED BY PROTEO, INC. AND FURNISHED TO
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.

THIS CERTIFICATION IS BEING FURNISHED PURSUANT TO RULE 15(D) AND SHALL NOT BE
DEEMED "FILED" FOR PURPOSES OF SECTION 18 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT (15 U.S.C. 78R),
OR OTHERWISE SUBJECT TO THE LIABILITY OF THAT SECTION. THIS CERTIFICATION SHALL
NOT BE DEEMED TO BE INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO ANY FILING UNDER THE
SECURITIES ACT OR THE EXCHANGE ACT, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE COMPANY
SPECIFICALLY INCORPORATES IT BY REFERENCE.