# Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District

Final Staff Report

Rescission and Federal Negative Declaration of 

# Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides

Adopted on February 21, 2012

43301 D IVISION 

### S T 

### ., S UITE 

### 206, L ANCASTER 

### , C ALIFORNIA 

### 93535-4649 P HONE 

### (661) 723-8070 FAX (661) 723-3450This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides TC-1

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 

### STAFF REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Rescission and Federal Negative Declaration of Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT ..................

................................................... ...................... 1

II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................

................................................... ......................... 1

III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION .....................

................................................... .................... 1
IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST .............

................................................... ........... 2
V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS .........

................................................... ....... 3 A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FINDINGS .................

................................................... ....... 3 1. State Findings Required for Adoption of Rule s & Regulations ...................... 3 a. Necessity ..................................

................................................... ......... 3 b. Authority ..................................

................................................... ......... 3 c. Clarity ....................................

................................................... ............ 3 d. Consistency ................................

................................................... ....... 3 e. Non-duplication ............................

................................................... .... 3 f. Reference ..................................

................................................... ......... 4 g. Public Notice & Comment, Public Hearing .... ..................................... 4 2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Fede ral Submittals) ........................ 4 a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requireme nts ............................... 4 b. Public Notice and Comment .................. .............................................. 4 c. Availability of Document ...................

.................................................. 4 d. Notice to Specified Entities ...............

.................................................. 4 e. Public Hearing...............................

................................................... ..... 4 f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement ..... ....................................... 5 g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were F ollowed ..................... 5 B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS .. ....................................... 5
C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ..........................

................................................... ................. 5 1. General ....................................

................................................... ...................... 5 2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness.............

................................................... ....... 5 D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CEQA) ..............

................................................... . 6
E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ........ ......................................... 6 1. Potential Environmental Impacts ............

................................................... ...... 6 2. Mitigation of Impacts ......................

................................................... .............. 6 3. Alternative Methods of Compliance ..........

................................................... ... 6TC

- 2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 F. PUBLIC REVIEW ..............................

................................................... ......................... 6

VI. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION .....................

................................................... ....................... 6
A. SOURCE DESCRIPTION .........................

................................................... ................. 6
B. EMISSIONS ..................................

................................................... .............................. 7 C. CONTROL REQUIREMENTS .......................

................................................... ............ 7
D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMARY.......................

................................................... ......... 7
E. SIP HISTORY.................................

................................................... ............................. 7 1. SIP History ................................

................................................... .................... 7 2. SIP Analysis ...............................

................................................... ................... 8 Appendix A – Federal Negative Declaration and Rule 1101 Iterated Version ............................A -1 Appendix B - Public Notice Documents ..............

................................................... .................... B-1 Appendix C - Public Comments and Responses ........

................................................... .............. C-1 Appendix D - California Environmental Quality Act D ocumentation ...................................... ..D-1 Appendix E - Bibliography .........................

................................................... .............................. E-1AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides 1

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 

### STAFF REPORT Rescission and Federal Negative Declaration of Rule 1101 - Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides

I. PURPOSE OF STAFF REPORT A staff report serves several discrete purposes. I ts primary purpose is to provide a summary and background material to the members of the Governing Board. This allows the members of the Governing Board to be fully informed before making any required decision. It also provides the documentation necessary for the Governing Board to make any findings, which are required by law to be made prior to the approval or adoption of a docu ment. In addition, a staff report ensures that the correct procedures and proper documentation for app roval or adoption of a document have been performed. Finally, the staff report provides evid ence for defense against legal challenges regarding the propriety of the approval or adoption of the do cument.
II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On July 1, 1997 the Antelope Valley Air Pollution C ontrol District (AVAPCD) was created pursuant to statute (former Health & Safety (H&S) Code §40106, A.B. 266-Knight Ch. 542, statutes of 1996) and assumed all air pollution control responsibilities from the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) for the area of Los Angeles Count y outside the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The SCAQMD rules in effect within the jurisdiction of the AVAPCD remained in effect until the AVAPCD Governing Board superceded, amended or resci nded them. On January 1, 2002 the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AV AQMD) was created pursuant to statute (H&S Code §41300 et seq.) to replace the AVAPCD. Once a gain the rules in effect at the time of the change remained in effect until the AVAQMD Governing Board superceded, amended or rescinded them. The SCAQMD adopted Rule 1101 on October 7, 1977 and is the current version in the rule book. The provisions of Rule 1101 apply to the operation of secondary lead smelting equipment. The AVAQMD has determined that there are no secondary l ead smelting operations located within the District and none are anticipated in the future. T he AVAQMD is therefore proposing to rescind Rule 1101 and adopt a Federal Negative Declaration (FND) . Since Rule 1101 was submitted as part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and a FND is also r equired to be a part of the SIP, the rescission and adoption need to be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) as a SIP revision.
III. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Governing Board of the AV AQMD adopt, after conducting a public hearing, a resolution approving the rescission of Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides and adoption of a Federal Negative Declaration. The Governing Board of the AVAQMD rescinded Rule 11 01 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides and adopted a Federal Negative Declaration on Febr uary 21, 2012.2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 IV. LEGAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST The findings and analysis as indicated below are re quired for the procedurally correct rescission of Rule 1101 - Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides and the adoption of a FND. Each item is discussed, if applicable, in Section V below. Copi es of documents are included in the appropriate Appendix.

FINDINGS REQUIRED FOR

RULES & REGULATIONS X Necessity X Authority X Clarity X Consistency X Non-duplication
X Reference
X Public Notice & Comment X Public Hearing REQUIREMENTS FOR STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN SUBMISSION (SIP):
X Public Notice & Comment X Availability of Document X Notice to Specified Entities (State, Air Districts, USEPA, Other States) X Public Hearing X Legal Authority to adopt and implement the document. X Applicable State laws and regulations were followed. ELEMENTS OF A FEDERAL SUBMISSION X Elements as set forth in applicable Federal law or regulations.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REQUIREMENTS (CEQA):
N/A Ministerial Action X Exemption N/A Negative Declaration N/A Environmental Impact Report N/A Appropriate findings, if necessary.
X Public Notice & Comment
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (RULES & REGULATIONS ONLY): X Environmental impacts of compliance. N/A Mitigation of impacts. N/A Alternative methods of compliance.
OTHER: X Written analysis of existing air pollution control requirements N/A Economic Analysis
X Public ReviewAVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides 3

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 V. DISCUSSION OF LEGAL REQUIREMENTS A. REQUIRED ELEMENTS/FINDINGS
This section discusses the State of California stat utory requirements that apply to the proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND. These are actions, that need to be performed, and/or information, that must be provide d in order to rescind the rule in a procedurally correct manner. 1. State Findings Required for Adoption of Rules & Regulations: Before adopting, amending, or repealing a rule or r egulation, the AVAQMD Governing Board is required to make findings of necessity, au thority, clarity, consistency, nonduplication, and reference based upon relevant info rmation presented at the hearing. The information below is provided to assist the Gov erning Board in making these findings. a. Necessity: The proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adopti on of a FND are necessary because there are currently no sources within the j urisdiction of the AVAQMD subject to the provisions of the rule and none are anticipated in the future. b. Authority: AVAQMD has the authority pursuant to H&S Code §4070 2 to adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations. c. Clarity: The proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adopti on of a FND are clear in that no current sources that are covered by the rul e exist. d. Consistency: The proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adopti on of a FND is in harmony with, and not in conflict with or contradictory to, any state law or regulation, federal law or regulation, or court decisions becau se there are currently no sources within the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD subje ct to the provisions of Rule 1101 and none are anticipated in the future. e. Non-duplication: The proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adopti on of a FND do not impose the same requirements as an existing state or feder al law or regulation because there are currently no sources within the jurisdict ion of the AVAQMD subject to the provisions of Rule 1101 and none are anticipate d in the future.4 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 f. Reference: AVAQMD has the authority pursuant to H&S Code §4070 2 to adopt, amend or repeal rules and regulations. g. Public Notice & Comment, Public Hearing: Notice for the public hearing for the proposed resc ission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND was published January 20, 2012. See Appendix “B” for a copy of the public notice. See Appendix C for copi es of comments, if any, and AVAQMD responses. 2. Federal Elements (SIP Submittals, Other Federal Submittals). Submittals to USEPA are required to include various elements depending upon the type of document submitted and the underlying federal la w which requires the submittal. The information below indicates which elements are required for the proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND a nd how they were satisfied. a. Satisfaction of Underlying Federal Requirements: Since Rule 1101 was submitted as part of the State Implementation Plan (SIP) and a FND is also required to be a part of the SIP, the rescission and FND must be submitted to the USEPA as a SIP revision.
b. Public Notice and Comment: Notice for the public hearing for the proposed resc ission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND was published January 20, 2012. See Appendix “B” for a copy of the public notice. c. Availability of Document: Copies of the proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND and the accompanying draft staff report were made avail able to the public on January 11, 2012. d. Notice to Specified Entities Copies of the proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND and the accompanying draft staff report were mailed to all affected agencies, including but not limited to the California Air Res ources Board (CARB) and USEPA on January 11, 2012. e. Public Hearing:AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides 5

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012

A public hearing to consider the proposed rescissio n of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND was held on February 21, 2012. f. Legal Authority to Adopt and Implement: The AVAQMD has the authority pursuant to H&S Code § 40702 to adopt, amend, or repeal rules and regulations and to do su ch acts as may be necessary or proper to execute the duties imposed upon the AV AQMD. g. Applicable State Laws and Regulations Were Follo wed: Public notice and hearing procedures pursuant to H& S Code §§40725-40728 have been followed. See Section (V)(A)(1) above fo r compliance with state findings required pursuant to H&S Code §40727. See Section (V)(B) below for compliance with the required analysis of existing r equirements pursuant to H&S Code §40727.2. See Section (V)(C) for compliance w ith economic analysis requirements pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6. See Se ction (V)(D) below for compliance with provisions of the California Enviro nmental Quality Act (CEQA). B. WRITTEN ANALYSIS OF EXISTING REQUIREMENTS H&S Code §40727.2 requires air districts to prepare a written analysis of all existing federal air pollution control requirements that apply to the sa me equipment or source type as the rule proposed for modification by the district. The pro posed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND will eliminate a rule for which t here are no sources within the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD and none are anticipated in the future. Therefore the preparation of a written analysis of existing pollution control requirements that apply to the same equipment or source type is not required. Any potential future sources would be accounted for by the current Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources (NSPS; AVAQMD Rule 900) and those standards and practices determined by the Maximum A vailable Control Technology (MACT; 40 CFR 63 Subpart X).
C. ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
1. General No economic impact is anticipated by the rescission of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND. There are currently no sources within the jur isdiction of the AVAQMD subject to Rule 1101 and none are anticipated in the future.
2. Incremental Cost Effectiveness Pursuant to H&S Code §40920.6, incremental cost eff ectiveness calculations are required for rules and regulations which are adopte d or amended to meet the California Clean Air Act requirements for Best Available Retro fit Control Technology (BARCT)6 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 or “all feasible measures” to control volatile comp ounds, oxides of nitrogen or oxides of sulfur. The proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the adopti on of a FND are not subject to incremental cost effectiveness calculations because this rule does not impose BARCT or “all feasible measures.” D. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS (CEQA) Through the process described below, it was determi ned that a Notice of Exemption would be the appropriate CEQA process for the proposed resci ssion of Rule 1101 and the adoption of a FND. 1. The proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the ado ption of a FND meet the

CEQA definition of “project.” They are not “minist erial” actions. 2. The proposed rescission of Rule 1101 and the ado ption of a FND are exempt from CEQA review because there are currently no sou rces within the jurisdiction of the AVAQMD subject to the provisions of Rule 110 1 and none are anticipated in the future, and there is not potenti al that the rescission might cause the release of additional air contaminants or creat e any adverse environmental impacts, a Class 8 categorical exemption (14 Cal. C ode Reg. §15308) applies.
E. SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 1. Potential Environmental Impacts There are currently no sources within the jurisdict ion of the AVAQMD subject to Rule 1101 and there is not potential that the rescission and adoption of a FND might cause the release of additional air contaminants or creat e any adverse environmental impacts. 2. Mitigation of Impacts
N/A 3. Alternative Methods of Compliance
N/A
F. PUBLIC REVIEW See Staff Report Section (V)(A)(1)(g) and (2)(b), a s well as Appendix B.
VI. TECHNICAL DISCUSSION
A. SOURCE DESCRIPTIONAVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides 7

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 Rule 1101 was adopted by the SCAQMD on October 7, 1 977 to achieve the ambient air standards for sulfur dioxide emissions from seconda ry lead smelters. The AVAQMD assumes the rule was adopted because there was a major sour ce in this source category operating within the SCAQMD. This rule was submitted by SCAQMD for inclusion into the SIP, which at that time included the area now known as the AVAQMD. Be cause this rule is in the AVAQMD SIP, and the AVAQMD has identified that it does not have any sources of the type covered by the provisions of Rule 1101 and is anticipating non e in the future, the AVAQMD is proposing to rescind Rule 1101 and to adopt a FND. There are no USEPA Control Techniques Guidelines (C TG) or Alternative Control Technology (ACT) guidance documents for this source category. However, regulations for this source category do exist as outlined in Standards of Perfo rmance for New Stationary Sources (NSPS; AVAQMD Rule 900; 40 CFR 60 Subpart L) and by those standards and practices determined by the Maximum Available Control Technology (MACT; 40 CFR 63 Subpart X). Although no sources are anticipated in the future, the NSPS and MACT standards will be applicable to any new sources that do arise.
B. EMISSIONS There are currently no sources subject to Rule 1101 ; therefore no environmental impacts are anticipated from the rescission of the rule and the adoption of a FND. C. CONTROL REQUIREMENTS There are currently no sources subject to Rule 1101 ; therefore, no additional emission control methods are required.
D. PROPOSED RULE SUMMARY The AVAQMD has identified that it does not have any sources of the type covered by the provisions of Rule 1101 and is anticipating none in the future. Therefore, the AVAQMD is proposing to rescind Rule 1101 and to adopt a FND.
E. SIP HISTORY 1. SIP History. Prior to 1975 the original air district for the Ant elope Valley region was the Los Angeles County APCD that had jurisdiction covering the enti re county of Los Angeles. In 1975, the Southern California Air Pollution Control Distr ict (So. Cal. APCD) was created. The So. Cal. APCD was created by a Joint Powers Agr eement (JPA) between Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Count ies to replace the previous countywide air pollution control districts for thos e counties. On February 1, 1977, pursuant to statute (Cal. Stats. 1976, Ch 324 p. 81 5) the SCAQMD was created with an initial jurisdiction that only included areas of Lo s Angeles, Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties contained within the South Coas t Air Basin (SCAB). Outlying8 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 areas remained under the So. Cal. APCD (The legisla tion was thereafter amended to allow non SCAB areas to “opt in”. Los Angeles Coun ty exercised this option and thus the Antelope Valley became a part of SCAQMD. Also on February 1, 1977 the CARB issued Executive Order G-73 (1977) which adopted a “rule book” for those non-SCAB areas of Los Angeles, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. CARB submitted the G73 rulebook on behalf of the “county” districts. By its terms Executive Order G-73 (1977) was only e ffective until the non-SCAB areas took other action. On February 22, 1977 the JPA fo rming the So. Cal. APCD was formally dissolved. By the terms of the JPA upon d issolution each county would regain its county air pollution control district with a ju risdiction of the non-SCAB areas of the county and the applicable rules being the So. Cal. APCD’s rules in effect upon the date of dissolution. On July 1, 1997 the Antelope Valle y Air Pollution Control District (AVAPCD) replaced the SCAQMD as the agency with jur isdiction over the Los Angeles County portion of the Mojave Desert Air Bas in (MDAB). On January 1, 2002 the AVAPCD was replaced by the AVAQMD. Pursuant to both statutory changes, the rule and regulations of the predecessor district we re retained until the Governing Board adopted, amended or rescinded them. At the first m eeting of the both the AVAPCD and the AVAQMD, the respective Governing Boards reaffir med all the rules and regulations in effect at the time the agency changed. The jurisdiction of the AVAPCD and the AVAQMD were specified in the statutes as the portion of the Los Angeles County contained wit hin the MDAB. The MDAB was formerly known as the Southeast Desert Air Basin (S EDAB). In 1997 the SEDAB was split into the MDAB and the Salton Sea Air Basin. Descriptions of these air basins can be found in 17 Cal. Code Regs. §§60109 and 60144. Since USEPA adopts SIP revisions in California as effective within jurisdi ctional boundaries of local air districts, when the local air district boundaries change the S IP as approved by USEPA for that area up to the date of the change remains as the SI P in that particular area. Thus, upon creation of the AVAPCD on July 1, 1997 the AVAPCD a cquired the SIP applicable to the Antelope Valley portion of the SCAQMD that was effective as of June 30, 1997. Likewise the AVAQMD acquired the SIP that was effec tive in the jurisdiction of the AVAPCD as of December 31, 2001. Therefore, the SIP history for this region is based upon the rules adopted, effective, and approved for the Antelope Valley by SCAQMD. Rule 1101 was originally adopted on October 7, 1977 by the SCAQMD. This version is the version in the SIP for the AVAQMD at 46 FR 4396 9, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(70)(i)(B), September 2, 1981 2. SIP Analysis. The District will request that CARB request Rule 11 01 to be removed from the SIP and replaced with a Federal Negative Declaration.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides A-1

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 

### APPENDIX "A" Federal Negative Declaration

and 

### Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides

Iterated Version

The iterated version is provided so that the change s to an existing rule may be easily found. The man ner of differentiating text is as follows: 1. Shaded text identifies new or revised language. 2. Lined out text identifies language which is bei ng deleted. 3. Normal text identifies the current language of t he current rule which will remain unchanged by the adoption of the proposed amendments.
4. Italicized text

identifies explanatory material that is not part o f the proposed language.A-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides A-3

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012A-4 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This Page Intentionally Left Blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 1101-1

Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides D1 12/08/11 

## RULE 1101

Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides

(a) A person shall not discharge into the atmospher e from any lead melting furnace such as described in Section (b) below, effluent process ga s containing sulfur oxides in excess of the concentration and mass flow rate indicated by both subsections (a)(1) and (a)(2): (1) 200 ppm of sulfur oxides expressed as sulfur di oxide, measured at the point of emission to the atmosphere, and calculated on a dry basis av eraged over a minimum of 15 consecutive minutes, and (2) 2.1 kilograms of sulfur oxides per metric ton o f process weight (4.2 pounds of sulfur oxides per short ton of proce ss weight) expressed as sulfur dioxide.

(b) This rule shall apply only to furnaces used to recover lead from the following: (1) Automotive batteries, and/or (2) Slag and dross resulting from the melting of au tomotive batteries.

[SIP: Approved 9/2/81, 46 FR 43969, 40 CFR 52.220( c)(70)(i)(B)]1101-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 Secondary Lead Smelters/Sulfur Oxides D1 12/08/11 This Page Intentionally Left Blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides B

- 1

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 

### APPENDIX "B" PUBLIC NOTICE DOCUMENTS
1. Proof of Publication for Notice of Public Hearing – Antelope Valley Press, January 20, 2012B-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides B

- 3

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 2.B-4 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides C

- 1

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 

### APPENDIX "C"

PUBLIC COMMENTS AND RESPONSES
No comments received at this time.C-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides D

- 1

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 

### APPENDIX "D"

CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT

DOCUMENTATION

1. Notice of Exemption – Los Angeles County, Posted 2/29/2012D-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides D

- 3

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012D-4 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This page intentionally left blank.AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides E-1

Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 

### APPENDIX "E" BIBLIOGRAPHY

The following documents were consulted in the prepa ration of this staff report and the proposed rescission of Rule 1101:

1. 46 FR 43969, 40 CFR 52.220(c)(70)(i)(B) 09/02/81 (S CAQMD SIP approval) 2. NSPS 40 CFR 60 Subpart L 3. MACT 40 CFR 63 Subpart XE-2 AVAQMD Rule 1101 – Secondary Lead Smelting/Sulfur Oxides Final Staff Report, 10/2/2012 This page intentionally left blank.