alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Richard Hiron, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bow Valley Ventures, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the period  ended November 30, 2008, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Richard HironName:Richard HironTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:January 14, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-03-200-CV

MIKE LEDBETTER 	APPELLANT

	V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS 	APPELLEE

	----------

	FROM THE PROBATE COURT OF DENTON COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	------------

	On December 19, 2003, we notified appellant, in accordance with rule of appellate procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this appeal unless the $125 filing fee was paid.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).  Appellant has not paid the $125 filing fee.  See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).

	Because appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the rules of appellate procedure and the Texas Supreme Court's order of July 21, 1998,2 we dismiss the appeal.  See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).

	Appellant shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:	DAUPHINOT, HOLMAN, and GARDNER, JJ.

DELIVERED: February 12, 2004
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________ No. 98-1077SI

_____________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Southern v. * District of Iowa. * Julian R. Aguilera, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellant. *

_____________ Submitted: October 19, 1998

Filed: October 28, 1998

_____________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and BEAM, Circuit Judges.

_____________ PER CURIAM.
Julian R. Aguilera appeals his jury convictions for conspiracy to distribute and posses s with intent to distribute marijuana, see 21 U.S.C. § 846 (1994), and fo r managing and controlling a place where drugs are manufactured and stored, see id. § 856(a)(2). Aguilera first contends the evidence is insuf ficient to support his conspiracy con viction. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict and drawing all reasonable inferences in the verdict’s favor, see United States v. Jenkins , 78 F.3d 1283, 1287 (8th Cir. 1996), we conclude the evidence clearly established the existence of a conspiracy and Ag uilera’s participation in the conspiracy. Aguilera also contends the district court improperly admitted hearsay evidence of other bad acts in-2-

violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). The evidence of conversations between Aguile ra and two coconspirators about their willingness to drive loads of drugs fo r money was e vidence of the charged offense rather than evidence of other bad acts , however. See United States v. Rodreguez , 859 F.2d 1321, 1327 (8th Cir. 1988); see also United States v. Moore , 149 F.3d 773, 780 (8th Ci r. 1998). Aguilera last contends th e district court applied the wrong standard in denying his motion to suppress

. Aguilera based his motion on the allegation that the affidavit supporting the searc h warran t contained faulty information. The district court properly applied Franks v

. Delaware , 438 U.S. 154, 171-72 (1978), and rejected Aguilera’s motion because h e failed to show that the police made a deliberately or recklessly false statement o r omission or that the allegedly false s tatement or omission was necessary to a finding of probable cause. See United States v. Gibson , 123 F.3d 1121, 1124 (8th Ci r. 1997). We thus affirm Aguilera’s convictions. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
TS- CDBA22



### Attachment #1

Material Safety Data Sheet

This attachment provides the material safet y data sheet ( M SDS) on the new chemical

substance.

# MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET

Page 7

Subs tance key: Revision Date: 06/16/2014

Version : 1 - 1 / USA Date of printing :06/16/2014

the use of the product described herein. Data provided here are typical and not intended

for use as product specifications.
SACRAMENTO METROPOLITAN



### AIR QUALITY Larry Greene MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER

November 18, 2008

James Goldstene Executive Officer California Air Resources Board PO Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812
SUBJECT: Submittal of State Implementation Plan Revision for Reasonably Available Control

Technology (RACT SIP) Dear Mr. Goldstene: Enclosed are four (4) copies of a revision to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) that was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District on October 23, 2008. This SIP revision was adopted pursuant to 40 CFR 51.192 and meets the requirements for Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) in accordance with Sections 182(b)(2) and 182(f) of the federal Clean Air Act. No comments were received from the public or U.S. EPA during the notice period or at the public hearing for this SIP revision. The SIP revision includes commitments to adopt requirements in Rule 450, Graphic Arts Operations, for mandatory control equipment for flexible packaging printing, offset lithographic printing, and letterpress printing presses with potential to emit, prior to controls, of at least 25 tons per year of VOC, and more stringent fountain solution requirements for offset lithographic printing operations with actual emissions of at least 450 pounds per month of VOC. The SIP revision also includes commitments to adopt more stringent requirements in Rule 451, SurPace Coating of Miscellaneous Metal Parts and Products, for metal furniture coating operations with actual VOC emissions of at least 3 tons per 12-month rolling period and to increase the required overall control efficiency to 90 %. The aforementioned commitments were satisfied by amendments to Rule 450 and 451 adopted on October 23, 2008 and September 25, 2008, respectively. The RACT SIP submittal contains the following enclosures: 1. Board letter; 2. Signed Board resolution; 3. Adopted SIP revision; 4. Staff Report that documents our analysis of the RACT requirements; 5. Evidence of Public Notice; If you have any questions regarding the enclosed SIP submittal, you may contact me at (916) 874-4802. Sincerely,

Larry Greene Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD

c: Brigette Tollstrup Laura Lawrence, CARB
Enclosures 777 12th Street, 3rd Floor ® Sacramento, CA 95814-1908 916/874-4800 0 916/874-4899fax www.airquality.org
|   |  (1) |   |  The      Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008      (the “Form 10-Q”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   |  (2) |   |  The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                       |                                                                      |                         |
|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                       |  CAPITAL EQUITY FINANCE,      INC.(Registrant)                       |
|                       |                                                                      |                         |
| Date:      August 11, 2008 |  By:                                                                 |  /s/      Luz M. Weigel |
|                       | Luz      M. Weigel                                                        |
|                       | President,      Secretary and Treasurer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement No.
333-68163 of Clark, Inc. on Form S-8, in the Registration Statement No.
333-68982 of Clark, Inc. on Form S-8, in the Registration Statement No.
333-46104 of Clark, Inc. on Form S-3, in the Registration Statement No.
333-106538 on Form S-8 and in the Registration Statement No. 333-72232 of Clark,
Inc. on Form S-3 of our reports dated March 2, 2005, relating to the financial
statements and management's report on the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Clark, Inc.
and subsidiaries for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Deloitte and Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois
March 2, 2005
#### Fond du Lac Citizens Loan & Investment Company, Appellant, vs. Webb and others, Defendants: Carey, Respondent.

*December 4, 1941*

March *10, 1942.*

*43For the appellant there were briefs by *Kelly & Boerner*of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by *J. L. Kelly.*

*J. E. O’Brien*of Fond du Lac, for the respondent.

The following opinion was filed January 13, 1942:

Fairchild, J.

Respondent demurred to the complaint on the ground that action on the note was barred by the six-year statute of limitations, sec. 330.19, Stats. It is conceded that after W. F. Carey affixed his signature to the paper more than six years passed before the summons was issued. It is asserted by appellant that the note is a sealed instrument and that the limitation on its right of action is that fixed by sec. 330.16 (2), to wit, twenty years. Carey with his comakers signed the note in such a manner that each of the signatures was immediately followed by the printed letters “L. S.” inclosed in brackets. The note was dated December 30, 1930, and the action was begun more than six years but less than twenty years later. Appellant’s action is timely and the demurrer cannot be sustained if the note is under seal.

Respondent argues that a reference to a seal is necessary in the body of a note to make it a sealed instrument, but the statute relating to sealed instruments (sec. 235.17, Stats.) does not require that there be any reference to a seal in the body of the instrument in order to make it a sealed instrument.

Sec. 235.17, Stats., provides that a scroll or device as a seal upon an instrument “shall have the same force and effect as a seal attached thereto” and then it is to be “of the same obligation as if actually sealed.” That statute and the interpretation to be found in *Williams v. Starr,*5 Wis. 534, 549, and *Banking Comm. v. Magnin,*239 Wis. 36, 300 N. W. 740, require the holding that this note so signed by Carey *44was under seal and necessitates the reversal of the ruling below.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to overrule the demurrer and grant judgment in favor of plaintiff.

The following memorandum was filed March 10, 1942 :

Fairchild, J.

*(on motion for rehearing).*

Motion for rehearing denied without costs.

The mandate is modified to read as follows:

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to overrule defendants’ demurrer, and for further proceedings according to law.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northern Minerals Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Damian O'Hara, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
12th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Damian O'Hara
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No.  333-51496)  pertaining to the Employee Stock Option Plan of Scottish Re
Group Limited (the Company) (formerly Scottish Annuity & Life Holdings, Ltd) and
the  incorporation  by reference  in the  Registration  Statement  (Form S-3 No.
333-113030) of the Company of our report dated  February 10, 2004,  with respect
to the consolidated  financial  statements and schedules of the Company included
in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2003.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
March 2, 2004
## F IFTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D23- 1872 LT Case No. 2021
- DR
- 1709

_____________________________ R YAN A LA N C OX , Appella nt,
v. L ORR AINE M ARIE C OX , Appellee
.

_____________________________ On a ppeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County. Thomas R. Eineman, Judge. Scott Ti mothy Smith, of Scott Timothy Smith, PA, Brooksville, for Appellant. Lorra ine Marie Cox, Ladoga, IN, pro se. M arch 19, 2024 P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . W ALLIS , H ARRIS and M AC I VER , J J., concur.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit 10(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186895) pertaining to Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-186895) and Amendment No. 294 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-09763), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln New York Account N for Variable Annuities for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.







/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
















Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this amended quarterly report of Amiworld, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the three month period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated        below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: December 23, 2009 | s/Mamoru Saito______________________ |
|--------------------------|--------------------------------------|

Mamoru Saito, Chief Executive Officer

 

| Dated: December 23, 2009 | s/Ingrely Veitia______________________ |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------------|

Ingrely Veitia, Chief Financial Officer
EX-35.7
(logo)WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA

CMBS Department
MAC N9401-011
1055 10th Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55414

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2012:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Custodian under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has
been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period.

March 19, 2013


/s/Kathleen Marshall
Kathleen Marshall
Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


To: Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian.
EXHIBIT 99.1
                                                                    ------------

[LOGO OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                          PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
                                          Beneficial Life Tower, Suite 1700
                                          36 S. State St.
                                          Salt Lake City UT 84111
                                          Telephone (801) 531 9666
                                          Facsimile (801) 933-8106


To the Board of Directors
of Franklin Capital Corporation as Servicer,
The Chase Manhattan Bank as indenture  trustee
under the Indenture dated March 1, 2000 and
Bankers Trust  (Delaware) as owner trustee under
the Trust Agreement dated March 1, 2000 related to
the 7.0% and 7.25% Asset Backed Notes:


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying management
assertion that Franklin  Capital  Corporation  ("FCC") complied with the minimum
servicing standards  identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
UNIFORM  SINGLE  ATTESTATION  PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE  BANKERS,  to the extent such
procedures are applicable,  in connection with the Sale and Servicing  Agreement
dated as of March 1, 2000, during the year ended September 30, 2003.  Management
is responsible for FCC's compliance with those minimum servicing standards.  Our
responsibility  is to express an opinion on  management's  assertion about FCC's
compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  conducted  in  accordance  with   attestation   standards
established  by the  American  Institute of Certified  Public  Accountants  and,
accordingly,   included  examining,  on  a  test  basis,  evidence  about  FCC's
compliance  with the  minimum  servicing  standards  and  performing  such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances.  We believe that our
examination  provides a reasonable  basis for our opinion.  Our examination does
not provide legal  determination of FCC's compliance with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that FCC complied with the aforementioned
minimum  servicing  standards during the year ended September 30, 2003 is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP


November 7, 2003