# APPENDIX D. ANNUAL ENERGY SIMU LATION INPUTS AND RESULTS FOR COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

D.1 INTRODUCTION

.......................................................................................................... D-1

D.2 MODELED DESIGN OPTIONS AND EFFICIENCY LEVELS

.................................. D-2

D.3 TABLES OF ANNUAL ENERGY SIMULATION RESULTS AND

ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

....................................................................................... D-10

D.4 COMPARISON OF CASE REFRIGERATION LOAD BETWEEN

SIMULATION AND ENGINE ERING ANALYSIS

................................................... D-18

D.5 DAILY ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR BASELINE EFFICIENCY FOR FIVE

CLIMATE LOCATIONS

............................................................................................. D-21

D.6 COMPARISON OF DAILY ENERGY CONSUMPTION BETWEEN

SIMULATION RESULTS AND E NGINEERING ANALYSIS

................................. D-24

D.7 COMPARISON OF DAILY ENERGY SAVINGS BETWEEN SIMULATION

RESULTS AND ENGINEER ING ANALYSIS

........................................................... D-36

D.8 COMPARISON OF ENERGY SAVINGS BETWEEN REFRIGERATION

SYSTEM AND WHOLE BUILDING

......................................................................... D-39

LIST OF TABLES

Table D.2.1 Summary of Modeled Design Options for VOP.RC.M

......................................... D-2 Table D.2.2 Summary of Modeled Design Options for SVO.RC.M

......................................... D-3 Table D.2.3 Summary of Modeled Design Options for VCT.RC.M

......................................... D-4 Table D.2.4 Summary of Modeled Design Options for HZO.RC.M

......................................... D-5 Table D.2.5 Summary of Modeled Design Options for SOC.RC.M

......................................... D-6 Table D.2.6 Summary of Modeled Design Options for VOP.RC.L

.......................................... D-7 Table D.2.7 Summary of Modeled Design Options for VCT.RC.L

.......................................... D-8

Table D.2.8 DOE-2.2R Input Parameters for Modeled Display Cases

..................................... D-9 Table D.3.1 Comparison of Annual Energy Si mulation and Engineering Analysis for

VOP.RC.M

...................................................................................................... D-10 Table D.3.2 Comparison of Annual Energy Si mulation and Engineering Analysis for

SVO.RC.M

...................................................................................................... D-11 Table D.3.3 Comparison of Annual Energy Si mulation and Engineering Analysis for

VCT.RC.M

...................................................................................................... D-12 Table D.3.4 Comparison of Annual Energy Si mulation and Engineering Analysis for

HZO.RC.M

...................................................................................................... D-13 Table D.3.5 Comparison of Annual Energy Si mulation and Engineering Analysis for

SOC.RC.M

...................................................................................................... D-14 Table D.3.6 Comparison of Annual Energy Si mulation and Engineering Analysis for

VOP.RC.L

....................................................................................................... D-15 Table D.3.7 Comparison of Annual Energy Si mulation and Engineering Analysis for

VCT.RC.L

....................................................................................................... D-16

D-i

# Table D.3.8 Comparison of Daily Energy Sa vings from Annual Simulation and from Engineering Analysis

...................................................................................... D-17

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure D.4.1 Case Refrigeration Load for VOP.RC.M

........................................................... D-18 Figure D.4.2 Case Refrigerat ion Load for SVO.RC.M

........................................................... D-18 Figure D.4.3 Case Refrigeration Load for VCT.RC.M

........................................................... D-18 Figure D.4.4 Case Refrigerat ion Load for HZO.RC.M

........................................................... D-19 Figure D.4.5 Case Refrigerat ion Load for SOC.RC.M

............................................................ D-19 Figure D.4.6 Case Refrigeration Load for VOP.RC.L

............................................................ D-19 Figure D.4.7 Case Refrigeration Load for VCT.RC.L

............................................................ D-20 Figure D.5.1 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VOP.RC.M

................. D-21 Figure D.5.2 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for SVO.RC.M

................. D-21 Figure D.5.3 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VCT.RC.M

................. D-21 Figure D.5.4 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for HZO.RC.M

................ D-22 Figure D.5.5 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for SOC.RC.M

................. D-22 Figure D.5.6 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VOP.RC.L

.................. D-22 Figure D.5.7 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VCT.RC.L

.................. D-23 Figure D.6.1 Daily Energy Consumpti on for VOP.RC.M for Baltimore

................................ D-24 Figure D.6.2 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Chicago

................................... D-24 Figure D.6.3 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Houston

.................................. D-24 Figure D.6.4 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Los Angeles

............................ D-25 Figure D.6.5 Daily Energy Consumpti on for VOP.RC.M for Memphis

................................. D-25 Figure D.6.6 Daily Energy Consumpti on for SVO.RC.M for Baltimore

................................ D-25 Figure D.6.7 Daily Energy Consumpti on for SVO.RC.M for Chicago

................................... D-26 Figure D.6.8 Daily Energy Consumption for SVO.RC.M for Houston

.................................. D-26 Figure D.6.9 Daily Energy Consumption for SVO.RC.M for Los Angeles

............................ D-26 Figure D.6.10 Daily Energy Consumpti on for SVO.RC.M for Memphis

............................... D-27 Figure D.6.11 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Baltimore

.............................. D-27 Figure D.6.12 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Chicago

................................. D-27 Figure D.6.13 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Houston

................................ D-28 Figure D.6.14 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Los Angeles

.......................... D-28 Figure D.6.15 Daily Energy Consumpti on for VCT.RC.M for Memphis

............................... D-28 Figure D.6.16 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Baltimore

.............................. D-29 Figure D.6.17 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Chicago

................................ D-29 Figure D.6.18 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Houston

................................ D-29 Figure D.6.19 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Los Angeles

.......................... D-30 Figure D.6.20 Daily Energy Consumpti on for HZO.RC.M for Memphis

............................... D-30 Figure D.6.21 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Baltimore

.............................. D-30 Figure D.6.22 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Chicago

................................. D-31 Figure D.6.23 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Houston

................................. D-31 Figure D.6.24 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Los Angeles

.......................... D-31 Figure D.6.25 Daily Energy Consumpti on for SOC.RC.M for Memphis

............................... D-32 Figure D.6.26 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Baltimore

............................... D-32

D-ii

# Figure D.6.27 Daily Energy Consumpti on for VOP.RC.L for Chicago

.................................. D-32 Figure D.6.28 Daily Energy Consump tion for VOP.RC.L for Houston

.................................. D-33 Figure D.6.29 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Los Angeles

........................... D-33 Figure D.6.30 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Memphis

................................ D-33 Figure D.6.31 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for Baltimore

............................... D-34 Figure D.6.32 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for Chicago

.................................. D-34 Figure D.6.33 Daily Energy Consumpti on for VCT.RC.L for Houston

.................................. D-34 Figure D.6.34 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for Los Angeles

........................... D-35 Figure D.6.35 Daily Energy Consumpti on for VCT.RC.L for Memphis

................................ D-35 Figure D.7.1 Daily Energy Savings for VOP.RC.M

................................................................ D-36 Figure D.7.2 Daily Energy Savings for SVO.RC.M

................................................................ D-36 Figure D.7.3 Daily Energy Savings for VCT.RC.M

................................................................ D-36 Figure D.7.4 Daily Energy Savings for HZO.RC.M

............................................................... D-37 Figure D.7.5 Daily Energy Savings for SOC.RC.M

................................................................ D-37 Figure D.7.6 Daily Energy Savings for VOP.RC.L

................................................................. D-37 Figure D.7.7 Daily Energy Savings for VCT.RC.L

................................................................. D-38 Figure D.8.1 Daily Energy Savings for Baltim ore (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

.......................................................................................................... D-39 Figure D.8.2 Daily Energy Savings for Ch icago (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

.............................................................................................. D-39 Figure D.8.3 Daily Energy Savings for H ouston (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

.............................................................................................. D-39 Figure D.8.4 Daily Energy Savings for Los Angeles (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

.............................................................................................. D-40 Figure D.8.5 Daily Energy Savings for Me mphis (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

.............................................................................................. D-40

D-iii

## D-iv

# APPENDIX D. ANNUAL ENERGY SIMULATION INPUTS AND RESULTS

FOR COMMERCIAL REFRIG ERATION EQUIPMENT

D.1 INTRODUCTION

This appendix presents further details on annual energy simulation inputs and results discussed in chapter 7, Energy Use and End-Us e Load Characterization. Section D.2 shows tables of assumptions and inputs used in a nnual energy simulation. Sections D.3 through D.7 present tables and figures of th e simulations results for the commercial refrigeration equipment analyzed; this includes comparisons of CRE re frigeration load and daily energy consumption between the simulation results and the engineerin g analysis. Section D.8 summarizes the impact of different refrigeration system design options on whole building energy use. As discussed in chapter 7, the results shown in this appendix represent analysis conducted for the NOPR and do not represent analysis and results used in the final rule.

D-1

# D.2 MODELED DESIGN OPTIONS AND EFFICIENCY LEVELS

Table D.2.1 Summary of Modele d Design Options for VOP.RC.M

Equipment Class VOP.RC.M

Efficiency Level AD1 AD3 AD5 AD7

Equipment Temperature (°F) 38

Discharge Air Temperature (DAT) (°F) 32

Saturated Evaporator Temperatur e (SET) (°F) 15.0 15.5 21.0 21.3

Total Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 20727.2 20084.5 19958.3 19173.9

NonElectric

Load Infiltration Load (Btu/hr) 1338.9 1338.9 1338.9 1338.9

Conduction and Radiation Load (Btu/hr) 170.3 170.3 170.3 158.7

Electric

Load Evaporator

Fan No. of Fans 6

Power Consumption per Fan (W) 45.0 13.6 13.6 13.6

Fan Operating Hrs 24

Lighting No. of Bulbs Inside Case 12

No. of Bulbs Outside

Case 9

Power Consumption per Bulb (W) 30.1 30.1 27.8 16.4

No. of Ballasts Inside

Case 0

No. of Ballasts Outside

Case 7

Power Consumption per Ballast (W) 1.4 1.4 1.7 0.0

Defrost

Heater Defrost Mechanism Off-time

Total Defrost Time per Day (hrs) 4.5

Defrost Heater Power (W) 0

Anti-Sweat

Heater Other Power (W) 0

Door Power (W) 0

Other Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

Door Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

D-2

# Table D.2.2 Summary of Modele d Design Options for SVO.RC.M

Equipment Class SVO.RC.M

Efficiency Level AD1 AD3 AD5 AD6

Equipment Temperature (°F) 38

Discharge Air Temperature (DAT) (°F) 32

Saturated Evaporator Temperatur e (SET) (°F) 15.0 15.4 21.0 21.3

Total Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 14449.9 14021.5 13929.7 13370.7

NonElectric

Load Infiltration Load (Btu/hr) 918.5 918.5 918.5 918.5

Conduction and Radiation Load (Btu/hr) 121.7 121.7 121.7 114.2

Electric

Load Evaporator

Fan No. of Fans 4

Power Consumption per Fan (W) 45.0 13.6 13.6 13.6

Fan Operating Hrs 24

Lighting No. of Bulbs Inside Case 9

No. of Bulbs Outside

Case 6

Power Consumption per Bulb (W) 30.1 30.1 27.8 16.4

No. of Ballasts Inside

Case 0

No. of Ballasts Outside

Case 5

Power Consumption per Ballast (W) 1.4 1.4 1.7 0.0

Defrost

Heater Defrost Mechanism Off-time

Total Defrost Time per Day (hrs) 3

Defrost Heater Power (W) 0

Anti-Sweat

Heater Other Power (W) 4.2

Door Power (W) 0

Other Run Time per Day (hrs) 24

Door Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

D-3

# Table D.2.3 Summary of Modeled Design Options for VCT.RC.M

Equipment Class VCT.RC.M

Efficiency Level AD1 AD3 AD4 AD6

Equipment Temperature (°F) 38

Discharge Air Temperature (DAT) (°F) 32

Saturated Evaporator Temperatur e (SET) (°F) 27.0 27.5 28.5 29.1

Total Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 5506.5 5149.5 4338.6 3841.3

NonElectric

Load Infiltration Load (Btu/hr) 104.7 104.7 104.7 104.7

Conduction and Radiation Load (Btu/hr) 417.4 417.4 374.7 344.9

Electric

Load Evaporator

Fan No. of Fans 5

Power Consumption per Fan (W) 30.0 9.1 9.1 9.1

Fan Operating Hrs 24

Lighting No. of Bulbs Inside Case 6

No. of Bulbs Outside

Case 0

Power Consumption per Bulb (W) 58.0 58.0 58.0 41.0

No. of Ballasts Inside

Case 6

No. of Ballasts Outside

Case 0

Power Consumption per Ballast (W) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Defrost

Heater Defrost Mechanism Off-time

Total Defrost Time per Day (hrs) 1

Defrost Heater Power (W) 0

Anti-Sweat

Heater Other Power (W) 0.0

Door Power (W) 100

Other Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

Door Run Time per Day (hrs) 24

D-4

# Table D.2.4 Summary of Modele d Design Options for HZO.RC.M

Equipment Class HZO.RC.M

Efficiency Level AD1 AD2 AD3 AD4

Equipment Temperature (°F) 38

Discharge Air Temperature (DAT) (°F) 32

Saturated Evaporator Temperatur e (SET) (°F) 15.0 15.4 15.9 21.2

Total Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 6484.0 6301.1 6073.4 6073.4

NonElectric

Load Infiltration Load (Btu/hr) 389.2 389.2 389.2 389.2

Conduction and Radiation Load (Btu/hr) 99.7 99.7 99.7 99.7

Electric

Load Evaporator

Fan No. of Fans 4

Power Consumption per Fan (W) 45.0 31.0 13.6 13.6

Fan Operating Hrs 23

Lighting No. of Bulbs Inside Case 0

No. of Bulbs Outside Case 0

Power Consumption per Bulb (W) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

No. of Ballasts Inside Case 0

No. of Ballasts Outside

Case 0

Power Consumption per Ballast (W) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Defrost

Heater Defrost Mechanism Electric

Total Defrost Time per Day (hrs) 1

Defrost Heater Power (W) 1000

Anti-Sweat

Heater Other Power (W) 4.2

Door Power (W) 0

Other Run Time per Day (hrs) 24

Door Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

D-5

# Table D.2.5 Summary of Modeled Design Options for SOC.RC.M

Equipment Class SOC.RC.M

Efficiency Level AD1 AD3 AD4 AD8

Equipment Temperature (°F) 38

Discharge Air Temperature (DAT) (°F) 32

Saturated Evaporator Temperatur e (SET) (°F) 20.0 21.0 21.3 27.2

Total Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 5279.2 4872.2 4757.4 3805.0

NonElectric

Load Infiltration Load (Btu/hr) 22.3 22.3 22.3 22.3

Conduction and Radiation Load (Btu/hr) 179.1 179.1 179.1 148.6

Electric

Load Evaporator

Fan No. of Fans 4

Power Consumption per Fan (W) 45.0 13.6 13.6 13.6

Fan Operating Hrs 22.8

Lighting No. of Bulbs Inside Case 15

No. of Bulbs Outside

Case 0

Power Consumption per Bulb (W) 30.1 30.1 27.8 16.4

No. of Ballasts Inside

Case 0

No. of Ballasts Outside

Case 5

Power Consumption per Ballast (W) 1.4 1.4 1.7 0.0

Defrost

Heater Defrost Mechanism Electric

Total Defrost Time per Day (hrs) 1.2

Defrost Heater Power (W) 1600

Anti-Sweat

Heater Other Power (W) 16.7

Door Power (W) 0

Other Run Time per Day (hrs) 24

Door Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

D-6

# Table D.2.6 Summary of Modeled Design Options for VOP.RC.L

Equipment Class VOP.RC.L

Efficiency Level AD1 AD3 AD4 AD6

Equipment Temperature (°F) 38

Discharge Air Temperature (DAT) (°F) 32

Saturated Evaporator Temperature ( SET) (°F) -20.0 -19.2 -14.2 -14.0

Total Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 24402.5 23027.9 22993.5 22624.5

NonElectric

Load Infiltration Load (Btu/hr) 1303.5 1303.5 1303.5 1303.5

Conduction and Radiation Load (Btu/hr) 252.8 252.8 252.8 236.7

Electric

Load Evaporator

Fan No. of Fans 14

Power Consumption per Fan (W) 45.0 13.6 13.6 13.6

Fan Operating Hrs 22

Lighting No. of Bulbs Inside Case 0

No. of Bulbs Outside

Case 9

Power Consumption per Bulb (W) 30.1 30.1 27.8 16.4

No. of Ballasts Inside

Case 0

No. of Ballasts Outside

Case 3

Power Consumption per Ballast (W) 1.4 1.4 1.7 0.0

Defrost

Heater Defrost Mechanism Electric

Total Defrost Time per Day (hrs) 2

Defrost Heater Power (W) 8700

Anti-Sweat

Heater Other Power (W) 50.0

Door Power (W) 0

Other Run Time per Day (hrs) 24

Door Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

D-7

# Table D.2.7 Summary of Modele d Design Options for VCT.RC.L

Equipment Class VCT.RC.L

Efficiency Level AD1 AD3 AD5 AD7

Equipment Temperature (°F) 38

Discharge Air Temperature (DAT) (°F) 32

Saturated Evaporator Temperature ( SET) (°F) -11.0 -10.7 -8.6 -8.2

Total Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 9282.9 8940.8 6499.8 5976.6

NonElectric

Load Infiltration Load (Btu/hr) 173.1 173.1 173.1 173.1

Conduction and Radiation Load (Btu/hr) 734.2 734.2 461.1 426.1

Electric

Load Evaporator

Fan No. of Fans 5

Power Consumption per Fan (W) 30.0 9.1 9.1 9.1

Fan Operating Hrs 23

Lighting No. of Bulbs Inside Case 6

No. of Bulbs Outside

Case 0

Power Consumption per Bulb (W) 58.0 58.0 58.0 41.0

No. of Ballasts Inside

Case 6

No. of Ballasts Outside

Case 0

Power Consumption per Ballast (W) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Defrost

Heater Defrost Mechanism Electric

Total Defrost Time per Day (hrs) 1

Defrost Heater Power (W) 5000

Anti-Sweat

Heater Other Power (W) 0.0

Door Power (W) 200

Other Run Time per Day (hrs) 0

Door Run Time per Day (hrs) 24

D-8Table D.2.8DOE-2.2RInput Parameters for Modeled Display Cases



## D-9EquipmentClassEfficiencyLevelsSET(°F)TemperatureDifference betweenSET and DAT(°F)Infiltration(Btu/hr-ft)*Conduction& Radiation(Btu/hr-ft)*EvaporatorFan(kW/ft)*Lighting(kW/ft)*Ratio ofLighting Loadto HVACZoneAntiSweat(kW/ft)*VOP.RC.MAD115.010.01,338.9170.30.02250.05350.230AD315.59.51,338.9170.30.00680.05350.230AD521.04.01,338.9170.30.00680.04970.230AD721.33.71,338.9158.70.00680.02870.210SVO.RC.MAD115.010.0918.5121.70.01500.03820.210.0042AD315.49.6918.5121.70.00450.03820.210.0042AD521.04.0918.5121.70.00450.03550.220.0042AD621.33.7918.5114.20.00450.02050.200.0042VCT.RC.MAD127.05.0104.7417.40.03000.06960.000.1000AD327.54.5104.7417.40.00910.06960.000.1000AD428.53.5104.7374.70.00910.06960.000.0500AD629.12.9104.7344.90.00910.04920.000.0500HZO.RC.MAD115.010.0389.299.70.015000.000.0042AD215.49.6389.299.70.010300.000.0042AD315.99.1389.299.70.004500.000.0042AD421.23.8389.299.70.004500.000.0042SOC.RC.MAD120.010.022.3179.10.01500.03820.020.0167AD321.09.022.3179.10.00450.03820.020.0167AD421.38.722.3179.10.00450.03550.020.0167AD827.22.822.3148.60.00450.02050.000.0167VOP.RC.LAD1-20.010.01,303.5252.80.05250.02290.510.0500AD3-19.29.21,303.5252.80.01590.02290.510.0500AD5-14.24.21,303.5252.80.01590.02130.510.0500AD7-14.04.01,303.5236.70.01590.01230.500.0500VCT.RC.LAD1-11.06.0173.1734.20.03000.06960.000.2000AD3-10.75.7173.1734.20.00910.06960.000.2000AD4-8.63.6173.1461.10.00910.06960.000.1100AD6-8.23.2173.1426.10.00910.04920.000.1100*For display cases with doors, unit is Btu/hr-door or kW/door.D.3TABLES OF ANNUAL ENERGY SIMULATIONRESULTS AND ENGINEERING ANALYSISTable D.3.1 Comparison of Annual Energy Simulation and Engineering Analysis for VOP.RC.M



## D-10EfficiencyLevelLocationAnnual Simulation ResultsEngineering Analysis ResultsCaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirectElectric Use(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)CaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirect ElectricUse(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)AD1Baltimore14,36821.933.820,72721.936.0Chicago13,97032.0Houston16,09542.0Los Angeles14,74931.8Memphis15,08038.0AD3Baltimore13,74017.432.120,08517.434.6Chicago13,34130.2Houston15,46540.0Los Angeles14,11730.2Memphis14,45336.3AD5Baltimore13,64216.328.519,95816.331.4Chicago13,24526.9Houston15,37435.9Los Angeles14,02126.9Memphis14,35632.3AD7Baltimore12,89810.226.919,17410.230.0Chicago12,50025.1Houston14,62834.0Los Angeles13,27125.3Memphis13,61030.5Table D.3.2 Comparison of Annual Energy Simulation and Engineering Analysis for SVO.RC.M



## D-11EfficiencyLevelLocationAnnual Simulation ResultsEngineering Analysis ResultsCaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirectElectric Use(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse (kWh/day)CaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirect ElectricUse(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)AD1Baltimore10,16016.524.814,45016.527.0Chicago9,87623.1Houston11,39130.8Los Angeles10,43723.8Memphis10,66927.8AD3Baltimore9,74213.523.614,02113.526.1Chicago9,45922.0Houston10,97029.5Los Angeles10,01822.6Memphis10,24826.6AD5Baltimore9,67212.721.013,93012.723.6Chicago9,38819.6Houston10,91026.5Los Angeles9,94620.0Memphis10,18123.7AD6Baltimore9,1428.419.813,3718.422.6Chicago8,85818.4Houston10,37525.1Los Angeles9,41318.9Memphis9,64822.4Table D.3.3 Comparison of Annual Energy Simulation and Engineering Analysis for VCT.RC.M



## D-12EfficiencyLevelLocationAnnual Simulation ResultsEngineering Analysis ResultsCaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirectElectric Use(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse (kWh/day)CaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirect ElectricUse(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)AD1Baltimore5,06324.09.65,50724.09.2Chicago5,0409.0Houston5,14810.7Los Angeles5,0748.8Memphis5,10310.1AD3Baltimore4,70321.48.85,14921.48.6Chicago4,6868.6Houston4,7899.9Los Angeles4,7157.9Memphis4,7439.3AD4Baltimore3,92715.47.34,33915.47.1Chicago3,8986.9Houston4,0078.2Los Angeles3,9386.7Memphis3,9677.7AD6Baltimore3,44713.06.33,84112.56.2Chicago3,4256.1Houston3,5277.1Los Angeles3,4595.7Memphis3,4876.7Table D.3.4 Comparison of Annual Energy Simulation and Engineering Analysis for HZO.RC.M



## D-13EfficiencyLevelLocationAnnual Simulation ResultsEngineering Analysis ResultsCaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirectElectric Use(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse (kWh/day)CaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirect ElectricUse(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)AD1Baltimore4,9666.412.16,4846.313.3Chicago4,82911.3Houston5,54215.4Los Angeles5,09711.6Memphis5,20513.7AD2Baltimore4,7775.111.66,3015.112.8Chicago4,64610.8Houston5,35414.7Los Angeles4,90911.1Memphis5,01713.1AD3Baltimore4,5663.611.06,0733.512.3Chicago4,43510.2Houston5,13714.0Los Angeles4,70310.5Memphis4,80012.5AD4Baltimore4,5553.59.96,0733.511.2Chicago4,4249.2Houston5,13712.6Los Angeles4,6869.3Memphis4,79511.2Table D.3.5 Comparison of Annual Energy Simulation and Engineering Analysis for SOC.RC.M



## D-14EfficiencyLevelLocationAnnual Simulation ResultsEngineering Analysis ResultsCaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirectElectric Use(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse (kWh/day)CaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirect ElectricUse(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)AD1Baltimore4,93221.810.95,27921.89.9Chicago4,91410.0Houston4,99412.0Los Angeles4,9379.4Memphis4,96011.4AD3Baltimore4,50319.09.74,87219.09.0Chicago4,4929.1Houston4,56610.7Los Angeles4,5218.6Memphis4,53810.1AD4Baltimore4,39518.29.44,75718.28.7Chicago4,3788.9Houston4,45210.3Los Angeles4,4068.5Memphis4,4249.9AD8Baltimore3,48713.96.63,80513.96.3Chicago3,4766.3Houston3,5397.3Los Angeles3,4996.0Memphis3,5167.0Table D.3.6 Comparison of Annual Energy Simulation and Engineering Analysis for VOP.RC.L



## D-15EfficiencyLevelLocationAnnual Simulation ResultsEngineering Analysis ResultsCaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirectElectric Use(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse (kWh/day)CaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirect ElectricUse(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)AD1Baltimore20,95352.389.824,40352.381.3Chicago20,69685.9Houston22,129101.4Los Angeles21,29085.4Memphis21,46196.0AD3Baltimore19,49242.682.323,02842.675.8Chicago19,22978.7Houston20,66293.3Los Angeles19,82378.4Memphis19,99488.2AD5Baltimore19,47542.174.422,99342.170.6Chicago19,21871.2Houston20,65185.0Los Angeles19,83470.8Memphis19,98979.8AD7Baltimore19,12139.672.922,62539.569.2Chicago18,85869.8Houston20,29783.3Los Angeles19,47569.5Memphis19,62978.1Table D.3.7 Comparison of Annual Energy Simulation and Engineering Analysis for VCT.RC.L



## D-16EfficiencyLevelLocationAnnual Simulation ResultsEngineering Analysis ResultsCaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirectElectric Use(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse (kWh/day)CaseRefrigerationLoad(Btu/hr)Case DailyDirect ElectricUse(kWh/day)CompressorDaily EnergyUse(kWh/day)AD1Baltimore8,78140.831.19,28340.828.5Chicago8,75429.6Houston8,85133.8Los Angeles8,77128.8Memphis8,81632.6AD3Baltimore8,42938.429.78,94138.427.3Chicago8,40228.3Houston8,50732.4Los Angeles8,42427.4Memphis8,46231.4AD4Baltimore6,03027.620.56,50027.619.3Chicago6,00319.5Houston6,09422.3Los Angeles6,03018.7Memphis6,06121.6AD6Baltimore5,50125.218.65,97724.717.7Chicago5,47917.7Houston5,56820.2Los Angeles5,50916.8Memphis5,53219.6Table D.3.8 Comparison of Daily Energy Savings fromAnnual Simulation and from Engineering Analysis



## D-17EquipmentClass SymbolEfficiencyLevelAnnual Simulation Results(kWh/day)Engineering AnalysisResults(kWh/day)BaltimoreChicagoHoustonLos AngelesMemphisVOP.RC.MAD36.36.36.56.16.25.9AD510.910.711.710.511.210.2AD718.618.519.718.119.117.6SVO.RC.MAD34.24.24.44.24.24.0AD57.57.48.27.67.87.2AD613.112.913.913.013.512.6VCT.RC.MAD33.33.53.33.43.33.2AD410.810.911.010.610.910.6AD614.314.114.514.114.414.5HZO.RC.MAD21.81.81.91.81.91.7AD34.14.04.24.04.13.9AD45.25.15.75.25.44.9SOC.RC.MAD34.13.74.23.74.23.8AD45.14.75.34.65.14.8AD812.311.612.711.412.411.5VOP.RC.LAD317.116.917.716.717.515.2AD525.524.826.524.626.420.9AD729.628.930.828.630.624.8VCT.RC.LAD33.83.83.83.83.63.6AD423.823.424.723.324.222.4AD628.227.629.327.728.727.0

# D.4 COMPARISON OF CASE REFRIGERAT ION LOAD BETWEEN SIMULATION

AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

VOP.RC.MCase Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 25000

20000

15000

10000

5000 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering

0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6



# Figure D.4.1 Case Refrigeration Load for VOP.RC.M

SVO.RC.MCase Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 

### 16000

12000

8000

4000

0 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Memphis Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Los Angeles Engineering



### Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6



# Figure D.4.2 Case Refrigeration Load for SVO.RC.M

VCT.RC.MCase Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

0 1000 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Memphis

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Los Angeles Engineering

Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.4.3 Case Refrigeration Load for VCT.RC.M

D-18

### 7000

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering


### 0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Case Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 

## HZO.RC.M



# Figure D.4.4 Case Refrigerati on Load for HZO.RC.M

SOC.RC.MCase Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr)



# Figure D.4.5 Case Refrigeration Load for SOC.RC.M

VOP.RC.LCase Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 30000

25000

20000

15000

10000

Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago 5000 Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering

0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6



# Figure D.4.6 Case Refrigeration Load for VOP.RC.L 6000

4000

2000

0 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



### Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD7



## D-19

## VCT.RC.LCase Refrigeration Load (Btu/hr) 

### 12000

9000

6000

3000

0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



# Figure D.4.7 Case Refrigeration Load for VCT.RC.L

D-20

# D.5 DAILY ENERGY CONSUMPTION FOR BASELINE EFFICIENCY FOR FIVE

CLIMATE LOCATIONS

VOP.RC.M-Eff Level AD1

80Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

60

40

20

0 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Baltimore Chicago Houston Los Angeles Memphis



# Figure D.5.1 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VOP.RC.M

SVO.RC.M-Eff Level AD1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Baltimore Chicago Houston Los Angeles Memphis



# Figure D.5.2 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for SVO.RC.M

VCT.RC.M-Eff Level AD1

0 10 20 30 40 50Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Baltimore Chicago Houston Los Angeles Memphis



# Figure D.5.3 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VCT.RC.M

D-21

### HZO.RC.M-Eff Level AD1

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Baltimore Chicago Houston Los Angeles Memphis



# Figure D.5.4 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for HZO.RC.M

SOC.RC.M-Eff Level AD1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Baltimore Chicago Houston Los Angeles Memphis



# Figure D.5.5 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for SOC.RC.M

VOP.RC.L-Eff Level AD1

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Baltimore Chicago Houston Los Angeles Memphis



# Figure D.5.6 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VOP.RC.L

D-22

### VCT.RC.L-Eff Level AD1

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Baltimore Chicago Houston Los Angeles Memphis



# Figure D.5.7 Daily Energy Consumption for Baseline Efficiency for VCT.RC.L

D-23

# D.6 COMPARISON OF DAILY ENERGY CONSUMPTION BETWEEN

SIMULATION RESULTS AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

HZO.RC.M-Baltimore

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.1 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Baltimore

HZO.RC.M-Chicago

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.2 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Chicago

HZO.RC.M-Houston

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.3 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Houston

D-24

### HZO.RC.M-Los Angeles

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)
CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.4 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Los Angeles

HZO.RC.M-Memphis

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec

`



# Figure D.6.5 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.M for Memphis

SVO.RC.M-Baltimore

0 10 20 30 40 50 60AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)
CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.6 Daily Energy Consumption for SVO.RC.M for Baltimore

D-25

### SVO.RC.M-ChicagoEnergy Consumption (kWh/Day) 60

50

40

30

20

10

0AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6 CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.7 Daily Energy Consumption for SVO.RC.M for Chicago

SVO.RC.M-Houston

0 10 20 30 40 50AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.8 Daily Energy Consumption for SVO.RC.M for Houston

SVO.RC.M-Los Angeles

0 10 20 30 40 50 60AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.9 Daily Energy Consumption for SVO.RC.M for Los Angeles

D-26

### SVO.RC.M-Memphis

0 10 20 30 40 50AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.10 Daily Energy Consumption for SVO.RC.M for Memphis

VCT.RC.M-Baltimore

0 10 20 30 40AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.11 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Baltimore

VCT.RC.M-Chicago

0 10 20 30 40AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.12 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Chicago

D-27

### VCT.RC.M-Houston

0 10 20 30 40AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.13 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Houston

VCT.RC.M-Los Angeles

0 10 20 30 40AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.14 Daily Energy Consumpt ion for VCT.RC.M for Los Angeles

VCT.RC.M-Memphis

0 10 20 30 40AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec

`



# Figure D.6.15 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.M for Memphis

D-28

### HZO.RC.M-Baltimore

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)



### CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.16 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Baltimore

HZO.RC.M-Chicago

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)



### CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.17 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Chicago

HZO.RC.M-Houston

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.18 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Houston

D-29

### HZO.RC.M-Los Angeles

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.19 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Los Angeles

HZO.RC.M-Memphis

0 5 10 15 20 25AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec

`



# Figure D.6.20 Daily Energy Consumption for HZO.RC.M for Memphis

SOC.RC.M-BaltimoreEnergy Consumption (kWh/Day) 

### 35

30 CompElec CaseDirElec

25

20

15

10

5

0AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.21 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Baltimore

D-30Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.22 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Chicago

SOC.RC.M-Houston

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.23 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Houston

SOC.RC.M-Los AngelesEnergy Consumption (kWh/Day)Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0 40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering CompElec CaseDirElec

`AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering CompElec CaseDirElecAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim. 

### SOC.RC.M-Chicago

35

30 CompElec CaseDirElec

25

20

15

10

5

0Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.24 Daily Energy Consumpt ion for SOC.RC.M for Los Angeles

D-31

### SOC.RC.M-Memphis

35Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

30

25

20

15

10

5

0 CompElec CaseDirElecAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.25 Daily Energy Consumption for SOC.RC.M for Memphis

VOP.RC.L-Baltimore

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.26 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Baltimore

VOP.RC.L-Chicago

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)
CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.27 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Chicago

D-32

### VOP.RC.L-HoustonEnergy Consumption (kWh/Day) 160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6 CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.28 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Houston

VOP.RC.L-Los Angeles

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.29 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Los Angeles

VOP.RC.L-Memphis

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6Energy Consumption (kWh/Day) CompElec CaseDirElec



# Figure D.6.30 Daily Energy Consumption for VOP.RC.L for Memphis

D-33

### VCT.RC.L-Baltimore

80

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.32 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for Chicago

VCT.RC.L-Houston

CompElec CaseDirElec 

### CompElec CaseDirElec

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.31 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for Baltimore

VCT.RC.L-Chicago

CompElec CaseDirElecEnergy Consumption (kWh/Day)Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)Energy Consumption (kWh/Day)

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0 80 

### 70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualAnnualSim.Sim.EngineeringEngineeringAnnualAnnualSim.Sim.EngineeringEngineeringAnnualAnnualSim.Sim.EngineeringEngineeringAnnualAnnualSim.Sim.EngineeringEngineering

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.33 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for Houston

D-34

## D-35 Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.35 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for MemphisEnergy Consumption (kWh/Day) 80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.6.34 Daily Energy Consumption for VCT.RC.L for Los Angeles

VCT.RC.L-Memphis

CompElec CaseDirElecEnergy Consumption (kWh/Day)

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0AnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.EngineeringAnnualSim.Engineering CompElec CaseDirElec

` 

### VCT.RC.L-Los Angeles

80

# D.7 COMPARISON OF DAILY ENERGY SAVINGS BETWEEN SIMULATION

RESULTS AND ENGINEERING ANALYSIS

VOP.RC.M

25Energy Savings (kWh/Day)



### 20

15

10

5

0 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



### Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6



# Figure D.7.1 Daily Energy Savings for VOP.RC.M

SVO.RC.M

16

4 6 8 10 12 14Energy Savings (kWh/Day) Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



### 2

0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6



# Figure D.7.2 Daily Energy Savings for SVO.RC.M

VCT.RC.M

16Energy Savings (kWh/Day) 14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



# Figure D.7.3 Daily Energy Savings for VCT.RC.M

D-36

### 6 

## HZO.RC.MEnergy Savings (kWh/Day)Energy Savings (kWh/Day)



### 5

4

3

2

1

0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD2 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



# Figure D.7.4 Daily Energy Savings for HZO.RC.M

SOC.RC.M

0 4 8 12 16 20Energy Savings (kWh/Day) Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



### Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.7.5 Daily Energy Savings for SOC.RC.M

VOP.RC.L

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD3 Eff Level AD5 Eff Level AD6 Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



# Figure D.7.6 Daily Energy Savings for VOP.RC.L

D-37

## VCT.RC.L

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35Energy Savings (kWh/Day) Annual Sim._Baltimore Annual Sim._Chicago Annual Sim._Houston Annual Sim._Los Angeles Annual Sim._Memphis Engineering



### Eff Level AD1 Eff Level AD4 Eff Level AD6 Eff Level AD7



# Figure D.7.7 Daily Energy Savings for VCT.RC.L

D-38

# D.8 COMPARISON OF ENERGY SAVI NGS BETWEEN REFRIGERATION

SYSTEM AND WHOLE BUILDING

Energy Savings for Baltimore (Ref. System versus Whole Building)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Energy Savings (MBtu) Ref. System
Whole Building

Level B Level C Level D



# Figure D.8.1 Daily Energy Savings for Baltim ore (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

Energy Savings for Chicago (Ref. System versus Whole Building)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Energy Savings (MBtu) Ref. System
Whole Building

Level B Level C Level D



# Figure D.8.2 Daily Energy Savings for Chicago (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

Energy Savings for Houston (Ref. System versus Whole Building)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Energy Savings (MBtu) Ref. System Whole Building

Level B Level C Level D



# Figure D.8.3 Daily Energy Savings for Houston (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

D-39

## Energy Savings for Los Angeles (Ref. System versus Whole Building)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Energy Savings (MBtu) 

### Ref. System Whole Building

Level B Level C Level D



# Figure D.8.4 Daily Energy Savings for Los Angeles (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

Energy Savings for Memphis (Ref. System versus Whole Building)

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500Energy Savings (MBtu) Ref. System Whole Building

Level B Level C Level D



# Figure D.8.5 Daily Energy Savings for Memphis (Refrigeration System versus Whole Building)

D-40