alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier:** 201 2

- NM

- 15 5

- AD

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Jennifer Rapacki, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
Report of Insight Management Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition
and results of operations of Insight Management Corporation.




Title:
Chief Executive Officer




By:
            /s/
      Jennifer
      RapackiName:
            Jennifer
      RapackiTitle:
            Chief
      Executive OfficerMay
      13, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

Section 1350 Certifications



I am the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
of EZJR, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”). I am delivering this certificate in connection with the Form 10-Q
of the Company for the quarter period ended June 30, 2013 and filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“Form
10-Q”).



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of EZJR, Inc. (the “Company”) certifies to his knowledge
that:

|(1)                                                             | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2013 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2)                                                             | The information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.                                               
|                                                               
|/s/ Adam Alred                                                 
|Adam Alred                                                     
|Principal Executive Officer
        Principal Financial Officer
|                                                               
|Date: August 14, 2013                                          
|
#### CULVER v. STATE et al.

No. 3237.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

July 3, 1935.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 19, 1935.

Mayfield & Grisham, of Tyler, for appellant.

William McCraw, Atty. Gen., and Merton Harris, L. H. Engelking and Tom D. *998Rowell, Jr., Asst. Attys: Gen., for appel-lees.

PELPHREY, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by the state of Texas and its Railroad Commission for the recovery of penalties for violations of an order of the commission with respect to placing .crude oil stock tanks on the lease on which a well is situated, or on an adjacent lease and for producing oil in excess of the amount allowable for appellant’s well.

Upon a trial by the court penalties of $750 per day for a period of eight days were assessed and Culver has appealed.

Opinion.

Appellant’s five assignments of error and three propositions raise only two questions, viz.: (1) The constitutionality of article 6036, Revised Statutes, as amended by the Acts of 1931, Forty-Second Legislature, First Called Session, c. 26, § 3; and (2) the admissibility of the transcript of the testimony of a witness at a former trial.

Appellant’s contention is that the statute is unconstitutional because it imposes excessive fines and authorizes unusual punishment (Const. Tex. art. 1, § 13); and because it violates the due process clauses of the Constitutions of Texas and of the United States (Const. Tex. art. 1, § 19; Const. U. S. Amend. 14).

The Austin Court of Civil Appeals ruled adversely to appellant on this identical contention in Culver et al. v. Smith, et al., 74 S.W.(2d) 754, and the Supreme Court refused a writ of • error. The assignment must, therefore, 'be overruled.

The objections urged to the introduction of the transcript of the testimony of the witness are: That a proper predicate had not been laid for' its introduction and that it was not properly verified.

The question as to whether a proper predicate had been laid rests largely in the discretion of the trial court and we cannot disturb his action in the matter unless a clear abuse of discretion is shown. 17 Tex. Jur. § 277, p. 660, and cases cited. We find no such abuse here.

The question of verification was not raised in the trial court and, of course, cannot be raised here for the first time.

The judgment is accordingly affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24027]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 439 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-27, K2025-26.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24027 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 99.6
                                                                    ------------

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                       OF

                          FRANKLIN CAPITAL CORPORATION


     This  certificate is being  delivered  pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale
and Servicing Agreement,  dated as of December 1, 2001 (the "Agreement"),  among
Franklin  Auto  Trust  2001-2,   Franklin   Receivables  LLC,  Franklin  Capital
Corporation (the "Servicer") and Franklin Resources, Inc.

     The  undersigned,  the duly elected  qualified and acting  President of the
Servicer,  DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, in my capacity as President and on behalf of the
Servicer,  as follows: (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the
preceding  12-month period and of its  performance  under the Agreement has been
made under my  supervision  and (ii) to the best of my  procedures  report  (the
"Report") be delivered by a firm of  independent  certified  public  accountants
pursuant to Section 4.11 of the Agreement, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations  under the Agreement  throughout the year. The Servicer expects that
the Report will be delivered by the firm of  independent  public  accountants to
the  Servicer,  the Seller,  the Owner  Trustee,  the  Trustee and the  Security
Insurer on or before February 28, 2003.

     Capitalized  terms used herein but not  otherwise  defined  herein have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto  set my hand this 3 day of  February
2003.


                                   By: /s/ Harold Miller
                                       ---------------------------
                                       Name:  Harold E. Miller
                                       Title: President
Regulatory Evaluation 

Docket No. FAA- 2015-4023 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NE-2-AD 

Add the 1vork hours. parts cost, and number of U.S. registered products to the table belmv. ~Vhen J'Oll are 

finished. click on the .. Update Fields " button to automaticallyfill in the totals. 

Update Fields j 

Estimated Costs: 

Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

(e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) 

Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor+ u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include oncondition costs here access, testing, (@$85/h parts) Registered 

and close-up) our) Products 

Strip, Inspect & Recoat 7.15 7835 10 CDP Seal Teeth 

The known number of products in compliance: Number 

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $84,428 

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $ \Varranty 

On-Condition Costs: ~ 

Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product 

(e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/hour) 

testing, and close- replacement) up) 

Inspection 

7 
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): 

Executive Order 12866: 

Could the AD be considered a "significant regulatory action"? • 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

Is the AD significant? • 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer. • 

YES D NO~ 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? • 

YES* 0 NO IZI 

*Explanation: 

8
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20652

DAVID A. MARTIN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant/ 

Cross-Appellee, 

versus

LEE COLLEGE; TOM SANDERS; 

PAMELA PAYNE; JACKSON SASSER; 

and DENNIS R. TOPPER, 

Defendants-Appellees/ 

Cross-Appellants 

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-3986 )

June 9, 1998

Before GARWOOD, JONES and WIENER, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-Appellant David A. Martin appeals from the district

court’s summary judgment dismissing his claims and from that

court’s denial of his motion to remand the case to the state court
2

from which it had been removed. Defendants-Appellees cross appeal

the district court’s dismissal of their counter claim for

attorneys’ fees and costs. 

We have reviewed the summary judgment record and considered

the facts and the arguments of counsel as set forth in their

respective briefs, and conclude not only that summary judgment was

providently granted but that Martin’s appeal is so lacking in merit

as to approach frivolousness. We therefore affirm the district

court’s dismissal of Martin’s claims and assess costs of this

appeal to him. Regarding the district court’s refusal to grant

attorneys’ fees and costs to the Defendants, our standard of review

is abuse of discretion and is thus so deferential as to mandate our

affirmance of the district court’s ruling on this issue. 

AFFIRMED at Appellant’s cost.
ex10a.htm
















Exhibit (10)(a)

















Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm












We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in Post-Effective Amendment No. 58 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) pertaining to Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N, which is incorporated by reference into Post-Effective Amendment No. 59 to the 1933 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 333-40937) and Amendment No. 413 to the 1940 Act Registration Statement (Form N-4 No. 811-08517), and to the use therein of our reports dated (a) April 1, 2014, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company and (b) April 1, 2014, with respect to the financial statements of Lincoln Life Variable Annuity Account N for the registration of interests in a separate account under individual flexible payment deferred variable annuity contracts.












/s/ Ernst & Young LLP











Philadelphia, Pennsylvania


August 22, 2014
-   

# Nuclear Modeling and Simulation Development and Deployment

Leads application-driven development of innovative and validated computational tools and analysis methods to efficiently model fission energy systems, nuclide transmutation, and nuclear fuel cycles.

### Contact

BobE Grove

grovere@ornl.gov

## Nuclear Modeling and Simulation Development and Deployment Section

## Group Leaders

Thomas Evans

Robert Lefebvre

F. Arzu Alpan

Matthew Jesse

Eva Davidson

## Current Research

## News

ExaSMR nominated for 2023 ACM Gordon Bell Prize

## News

Exascale-level simulation toolkit advances state-of-the-art nuclear reactor design 

## News

Celeritas code will accelerate high energy physics simulations with supercomputers

## News

Rike Bostelmann: Shaping the future of nuclear energy through modeling and simulation
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-20085

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

VIRGILIU BUIUC, also known as Massimiliano

Bartolozzi,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-01-CR-553-3

--------------------

Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Virgiliu Buiuc has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Buiuc has not filed

a response. Our independent review of the brief and the

record discloses no nonfrivolous issue in this direct appeal. 

Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel

is excused from further responsibilities herein, and Buiuc’s

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3178

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the mandatory separation age for Federal firefighters be made the same as the age that

applies with respect to Federal law enforcement officers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 6 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. REID for (Mrs. FEINSTEIN (for herself, Mrs. BOXER, and Mr. AKAKA))

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the

Committee on Governmental Affairs

A BILL

To amend title 5, United States Code, to provide that the

mandatory separation age for Federal firefighters be

made the same as the age that applies with respect

to Federal law enforcement officers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MANDATORY SEPARATION AGE FOR FIRE4 FIGHTERS.

5 (a) CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—

6 (1) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of sec7 tion 8335(b) of title 5, United States Code, is

8 amended—
2

•S 3178 IS

1 (A) by inserting ‘‘, firefighter,’’ after ‘‘law

2 enforcement officer’’; and

3 (B) by inserting ‘‘, firefighter,’’ after ‘‘that

4 officer’’.

5 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

6 8335(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended

7 by striking the first sentence.

8 (b) FEDERAL EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT SYSTEM.—

9 (1) IN GENERAL.—The second sentence of sec10 tion 8425(b) of title 5, United States Code, is

11 amended—

12 (A) by inserting ‘‘, firefighter,’’ after ‘‘law

13 enforcement officer’’; and

14 (B) by inserting ‘‘, firefighter,’’ after ‘‘that

15 officer’’.

16 (2) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

17 8425(b) of title 5, United States Code, is amended

18 by striking the first sentence.

Æ
Exhibit 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with  the Annual  Report  of Sunburst Acquisitions VI,  Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form  10-KSB  for  the  period   ending  April 30,  2004
(the  "Report"),  I,   Michael R. Quinn,  Principal  Executive  Officer  and
Principal Financial Officer of the  Company, certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as  adopted pursuant  to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The information contained in the  Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.




/s/ Michael R. Quinn
-----------------------
Michael R. Quinn
Principal Executive Officer
Principal Financial Officer
Date: December 27, 2004
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20711 and #20712; GEORGIA Disaster Number GA-20013]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 6.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Georgia (FEMA-4830-DR), dated 09/30/2024.

*Incident:*                         Hurricane Helene.                    

*Incident Period:*                         09/24/2024 and continuing.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/14/2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         11/29/2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/30/2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Georgia, dated 09/30/2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     McIntosh.                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*                     All counties contiguous to the above-named county have been previously declared.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-24180 Filed 10-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P