alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
August 13, 2014 

Larry McDonald 

Air Transportation Division/National 

Simulator Program Branch, AFS-205 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

Robert H. Frenzel 

Manager, Operations Law Branch, 

Airlines for America· 

Office of the Chief Counsel, Regulations Division (AGC-200) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

BOO Independence Avenue SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

RE: Flight Simulation Training Device Qualification Standards for Extended Envelope and Adverse 

Weather Event Training Tasks Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

Dear Larry and Robert, 

Airlines for America ("A4A"), respectfully requests that the Federal Aviation Administration ("FAA") grant 

an extension to the comment period for the Flight Simulation Training Device Qualification Standards for 

Extended Envelope and Adverse Weather Event Training Tasks Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

("NPRM") published on July 10, 2014. 

We request that FAA extend the comment an additional 90 days because the proposal is lengthy (293 

pages), includes highly technical content that requires thorough analysis, which will take considerable 

time to review and provide meaningful comments. 

In addition, experts will need to examine existing 14 C.F.R. Part 60 requirements , International Civil 

Aviation Organization ("ICAO") requirements and recommended practices in this area, and the NPRM to 

determine areas of commonality and disparity, so as to be able to comment on the harmonization of these 

documents. 

Finally, ICAO documents referenced in the NPRM are not currently in the docket and the public will need 

to have access to them to answer FAA questions and provide comprehensive comments so the agency 

can provide a better informed decision. 

We look forward to working with the FAA in this rulemaking and providing information to assist FAA 

review and decision-making. 

Sincerely, 

Doug Mullen 

7c ~ 

Assistant General Counsel 

Airlines for America 

1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW, Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20004-1707 T: 202.626.4000 E: a4a@airlines.org W: airlines.org
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of AI Document Services, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Cohen, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1. The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Mark Cohen Mark Cohen Title: President and Chief Financial Officer  April 17, 2013
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-1676

MARIE THERESE ASSA’AD-FALTAS, MD MPH for herself and qui 

tam and Ex Rel the government of the Arab Republic of Egypt 

and qui tam the United States of America,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; NIMRATA HALEY, as SC’s Governor; 

ALAN WILSON, as SC’s Attorney General; KEN ARD, as SC’s 

Lieutenant Governor and President of its Senate; GLENN 

MCCONNELL, as President pro tempore of SC’s Senate and chair 

of its judicial merit selection commission; JEAN TOAL, as 

administrative head of all SC’s state courts; SOUTH CAROLINA 

GENERAL ASSEMBLY; MARK KEEL, as chief of SC’s State Law 

Enforcement Division; KEN LANCASTER, as acting head of SC’s 

Department of Public Safety; LEON LOTT, as sheriff of 

Richland County SC and warden of the Alvin S. Glenn 

Detention Center; JEANETTE MCBRIDE, as Richland County’s 

Clerk of Court; WILLIAM NORMAN NETTLES, as US Attorney for 

the District of South Carolina; CITY OF COLUMBIA, all solely 

officially and for injunctive and qui tam relief; LESLEY 

MCALLISTER COGGIOLA, officially as SC’s disciplinary counsel 

solely for injunctive relief; JAKE KNOTTS, falsely bearing 

the title of SC state senator; DANA TURNER, falsely bearing 

the title of Chief Administrative Judge of the City’s 

Municipal Court; RANDY SCOTT, falsely bearing the title of 

the City’s Chief of Police; MARION HANNA, falsely bearing 

the title of CMC judge; KEN GAINES; ROBERT G. COOPER; DAVID 

A. FERNANDEZ, supposed attorneys for the city and all their 

subordinates who did and or intend to injure plaintiff all 

for injunctive relief qui tam damages and other legal 

relief,

Defendants - Appellees.
2

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. 

(3:11-cv-03077-TLW)

Submitted: November 20, 2012 Decided: November 26, 2012

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit 

Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
3

PER CURIAM:

Marie Therese Assa’ad-Faltas, M.D., M.P.H., appeals 

the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s 

recommendation to dismiss her complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1915 (2006), as well as its orders denying her Fed. R. Civ. P. 

59(e) and 60(b) motions. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s orders. See Assa’ad-Faltas v. South Carolina, No. 3:11-

cv-03077-TLW (D.S.C. March 22, 2012; April 25, 2012; Aug. 13, 

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
#### Konecny, Appellant, vs. Olrich and others, Defendants: Mittelstadt and another, Respondents.

*January 15*

February *17, 1948.*

*Clarence E. Teitgen*of Manitowoc, for the appellant.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Bendinger, Hayes*&' *Kluwin*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Gerald P. Hayés.*

Hughes, J.

The respondent Mittelstadt, being free from negligence, there can be no recovery by the appellant. This case is controlled by *Hoehne v. Mittelstadt,*ante, p. 170, 31 N. W. (2d) 150.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20699 and #20700; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20012]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 2.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated September 28, 2024.

# DATES:

Issued on October 3, 2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         November 27, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 30, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Florida, dated September 28, 2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Incident:*                     Hurricane Helene.                

*Incident Period:*                     September 23, 2024 and continuing.                

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Gulf.                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Florida: Bay, Calhoun.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-23575 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit
99.4











March 13,
2019








Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2018 of Denison Mines
Corp. of our report dated March 7, 2019, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which is filed as an Exhibit to,
and incorporated by reference in, this Annual Report.





We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-48174, No. 333-148915, No.
333-190121 and 33-224641) of Denison Mines Corp. of our report
dated March 7, 2019 referred to above. We also consent to the
reference to us under the heading “Interests of
Experts,” which appears in the Annual Information Form
included in the Exhibit incorporated by reference in this Annual
Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by reference in such
Registration Statements.











(Signed) "PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP"





Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public
Accountants


Toronto, Ontario,
Canada














PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 PwC
Tower, 18 York Street, Suite 2600, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J
0B2
 T: +1 416
863 1133, F: +1 416 365 8215, www.pwc.com/ca
 
 “PwC” refers to
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability
partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited, each a member firm of which is a separate
legal entity.
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report Of Foreign Private Issuer pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Satélites
Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Cynthia Pelini, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, that to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§1350,
as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/  CYNTHIA PELINICynthia PeliniChief Financial OfficerJuly 15, 2004
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 20-F of Kofax Limited (the Company) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James Arnold Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Principal Executive Officer, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

(i) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(ii) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date:
September 2, 2014



By:

/s/ James Arnold Jr.James Arnold Jr.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 03

- 00583

- CV

Robert Needham and Deborah Needham, Appellants

v.

Leonard Schwa rtz, Individually and as Trustee for 2828 Lost Oak Cove Land Trust, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY, 26TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 01

- 150

- C26, HONORABLE DONALD HUMBLE, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The judgment in this case was signed on June 17, 2003, and a motion for new

trial was filed on July 15 and a notice of appeal was filed September 16. Since that time,

appellants Robert Needham and Deborah Needham have failed to pay any of the requisite

fi ling fees, request the preparation of or make arrangements to pay for a clerk = s record or a

reporter = s record. No docketing statement was filed. On December 3, 2003, this Court

n otified appellants in writing that the clerk = s and reporter =

s records were overdue and that if

they were not each filed by December 15 the Court would take action to dispose of the appeal.

See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(1). Neither the clerk = s nor reporter =

s record have been filed since

that time, and appellants have not otherwise responded to the Court. No brief was filed onappellants = behalf.

Accordingly, this appeal i s hereby dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 37.3(a)(1),(b), 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b) and (c).

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before C hief Justice Law, Justices B. A. Smith, and Patterson

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: January 23, 2004
Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Acoba, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ. 1

SCWC-29792

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

STATE OF HAWAI#I ,

Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JASON KIESE,

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

 

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(FC-CR NO. 09-1-1136)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: McKenna, J., for the court1)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Jason Kiese’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed on June 15, 2011, is

accepted and will be scheduled for oral argument. The parties

will be notified by the appellate clerk regarding scheduling.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 29, 2011.

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-29792

29-JUL-2011

02:07 PM
FOR THE COURT:

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

Associate Justice

Taryn R. Tomasa, Deputy Public Defender

for Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
Exhibit 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yellow Hill Energy Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay
Jhaveri, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
4th day of September, 2009.


/s/ Jay Jhaveri
----------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
#### Village of Whitefish Bay, Appellant, vs. Public Service Commission and another, Respondents.

*December 8, 1942*

January *12, 1943.*

*George H. Gabel*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent Public Service Commission there was a brief by *the Attorney General*and *H. T. Ferguson,*assistant attorney general, and .oral argument by *Mr. Ferguson.*

For the respondent city of Milwaukee there was a brief by *Walter J. Mattison,*city attorney, and *Ronold A. Drechsler,*assistant city attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Drechsler.*

A brief *amicus curice*was filed by *John C. Doerfer,*city attorney of West Allis.

Fairchild, J.

The facts involved in this case are similar to those in the case of *Fox Point v. Public Service Comm., ante,*p. 97, 7 N. W. (2d) 571, and are governed by the same principles. The order appealed from is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.

Barlow, J., took no part.
#### In the Matter of the Application of Charles Belous, Petitioner, for a Peremptory Order of Mandamus against S. Howard Cohen and Others, as Commissioners of Elections, Constituting the Board of Elections in the City of New York, Respondents.*

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

October 19, 1937.

*882
      *Irving Lemov,*for the petitioner.

*Paul Windels, Corporation Counsel,*for the respondents.

Affd., 252 App. Div. 787; affd., 275 N. Y. 640.

Hallinan, J.

The petitioner is a candidate for the office of councilman for the borough of Queens. He was designated by the City Fusion party in a petition containing no less than 2,000 signatures of qualified electors. He now claims himself to be entitled • to the designations also of the American Labor party, the Citizens Non-Partisan Committee and the Progressive party. As to the first two of these independent groups, petitions designating him were filed, each of said petitions containing *less*than 2,000 signatures. As to the Progressive party, no separate petition or designation w;as filed.

The county committees of the above-named independent bodies filed with the respondents separate certificates authorizing the petitioner to carry on the official ballot the designation of their respective groups. The respondents, however, ruled that separate nominating petitions for *each group, containing no less than 2,000 signatures, was necessary*in order to entitle a candidate to these party designations; that since the designation of the City Fusion party alone contained more than 2,000 signatures, petitioner was entitled to that designation and to no others.

It is my opinion that the ruling of the respondents is the correct one. Under the system adopted by the city of New York (N. Y. City Charter, chap. 43, § 1005, subd. 2) it is provided that “ after each candidate’s name shall be printed the party, group or individual designations specified on his nominating petitions.” Thus, party or group designations are specifically recognized, though emblems are barred.

Since, under subdivision b of section 1004, a *nominating petition*must be signed by not fewer than 2,000 electors, and since under subdivision 2 of section 1005 a candidate is entitled to have printed after his name the party, group or individual designations specified in his *nominating petitions,*it follows that a candidate is entitled to have printed after his name only the party, group or individual designations specified in each of such petitions as complies with subdivision b of section 1004 of the new charter.

In the present instance the designation of the City Fusion party alone complies with that provision, and the petitioner is entitled to have the name of that party, alone, printed after his name.

Motion denied. Submit order.
MEMORANDUM

FROM: Steven Silverman, Attorney OGC TO: Portland Cement NESHAP Clarification notice Docket RE: Conversation with Jim Pew, Esq. On the afternoon of October 21, Keith Barnett and I called Jim pew, counsel to EarthJustice and main author of t heir comments during the rulemaking, to give him advance notice of four clarify ing changes we are contemplating for the portland cement NESHAP rule language. These are: restoring the pre

- 2009 standards during the period before compliance with the newly a dopted standards, adding open clinker piles and opacity to the list of standards with a November 2013 compliance date, fixing a cross reference, and adding words dropped from a table in the rule.
I, Richard Hiron, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Bow Valley Ventures,  Inc. (the Registrant), certify that; (1)I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Registrant;(2)Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;(3)Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;(4)I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the Registrant and have:a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and(5)I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.  October 15, 2009/s/Richard HironBy:Richard HironPresident, Chief Executive Officerand Chief Financial Officer