alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2011047EN.01000301.xml

| 22.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/3

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 158/2011

of 21 February 2011

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Špekáčky’/‘Špekačky’ (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, the Czech Republic and Slovakia’s joint application to register the name ‘Špekáčky’/‘Špekačky’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, the Czech Republic and Slovakia’s joint application to register the name ‘Špekáčky’/‘Špekačky’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register.

| (3) | Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 February 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 94, 14.4.2010, p. 18.

2

---

ANNEX

Products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

CZECH REPUBLIC

Špekáčky (TSG)

SLOVAKIA

Špekačky (TSG)

---
#### Ex parte RAMSEY.

No. 15264.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1932.

David L. Broadus, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CALHOUN, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district judge of Jefferson county remanding the relator to the custody of the sheriff of Jefferson county.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

•The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of. the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 109,512

In the Matter of SUSAN L. BOWMAN,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISCHARGE FROM PROBATION

On October 18, 2013, this court suspended the respondent's license to practice law 

for a period of 12 months. The court ordered that the respondent undergo a reinstatement 

hearing prior to consideration of reinstatement. See In re Bowman, 298 Kan. 231, 310 

P.3d 1054 (2013).

Following a reinstatement hearing, on November 24, 2015, this court granted the 

respondent's petition for reinstatement and reinstated the respondent's license to practice 

law, subject to a term of probation. 

On November 21, 2018, the respondent filed a motion for discharge from 

probation, along with affidavits demonstrating compliance with the terms of probation. 

On November 28, 2018, the Disciplinary Administrator filed a response, confirming that

the respondent fully complied with the conditions imposed upon her by the court and 

offering no objection to the respondent's discharge from probation. 

This court, having reviewed the motion, the affidavits, and the response of the 

Disciplinary Administrator, finds that the respondent should be discharged from 

probation. 
2

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the respondent is discharged from probation and 

from any further obligation in this matter and this proceeding is closed. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports

and that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent.

Dated this 9th day of January, 2019.
Draft Protocol EWIMS Data Team Meeting Log

The Team Meeting Log will be completed by each EWIMS Data team after each meeting and 

will be collected by the evaluation team on a monthly basis. The evaluation team will use this 

information to document the quality and frequency of EWIMS data team meetings as an 

indicator of fidelity of implementation. 

Meeting Date:

Meeting Time: <##:##> to <##:##>

Participants: <Prepopulate with EWIMS team members, and have space for others>

Activities: (check all that apply)

- Discussed individual students (How many? ___ )

- Discussed groups of students

o Students with disabilities

o Students who are disadvantaged 

o Students by race/ethnicity

o English Language Learners

o Custom Cohort

o Other (specify: 

_______________________________________________________)

- Assigned students to interventions (How many students? How many interventions?)

- Other activities:

o __________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

____________

o __________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

____________

o __________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

____________

Reports Used During the Meeting:

- Student-Level Reports

o Flagged Student Report

o Flagged Student Report: Disabilities

o Flagged Student Report: Disadvantaged

o Flagged Student Report: ELL

o Incoming Indicator of Risk Report

o Incoming Indicator of Risk Transition Report

o Off- to On-Track Report

o On- to Off-Track Report
o Flagged Student Intervention Report

o Intervention Report

o Under-Credited Student Report

o Student Dropout Report

o Custom Reports: 

- School-Level Reports

o Risk Indicator Summary Report

o Risk Indicator Summary Report: Disability Categories

o Indicator Summary Report: Disadvantaged

o Indicator Summary Report: ELL

o Enrollment Status Summary Report

o Intervention Summary Report: Program

o Intervention Summary Report: Tiers

o Intervention Summary Report: Type

o Incoming Indicator Transition Report

- Detailed Student Reports (##)

- Student-Level Intervention Summary

Action Items:

Item Person Responsible Date Due
Rialto
CAPTIAL
 February
28, 2014
 To:
 UBS
Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corporation, as Depositor 
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate
Administrator and Paying Agent 
and
Custodian 
Midland
Loan Services, a Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer
 2013
Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)
  Name
of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series:
  - UBS
2012-C3
  (Referred
to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements") 
The
undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,
as special servicer (the 
"Special Servicer") herein cetiifies to the following:
  1. 
2.
3.
 All
servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
each of the Security 
Agreements
are performed on behalf ofthe Special Servicer. 
A
review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special
Servicer for the period of 
Januaty
1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance
with the servicing 
agreements applicable to each Security Agreement has been conducted
under my supervision. 
To
the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the 
terms
of the Security Agreements, in all material respects for the Repotiing
Period and if there 
has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material
respect, each failure and the 
nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herewith.
   Certified
By: /s/Thekla Salzman
 Date:
Februaty 28, 2014
 Thekla Salzman 
Chief
Administrative Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3157

To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish restrictions regarding the qualifications of physicians to prescribe the abortion drug commonly known as RU–486.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 4 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Mr. HUTCHINSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To require the Food and Drug Administration to establish

restrictions regarding the qualifications of physicians to

prescribe the abortion drug commonly known as RU–

486.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘RU–486 Patient

5 Health and Safety Protection Act’’.
2

•S 3157 IS

1 SEC. 2. RESTRICTIONS FOR PRESCRIBING ABORTION

2 DRUG.

3 With respect to the application that was submitted

4 under section 505(b) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos5 metic Act for the drug mifepristone (commonly referred

6 to as RU–486, to be marketed as MIFEPREX), and that

7 was approved on September 28, 2000, the Secretary of

8 Health and Human Services, acting through the Commis9 sioner of Food and Drugs, shall promptly modify the con10 ditions of the approval of such drug to establish the addi11 tional restriction that the drug may not be prescribed by

12 any person other than a licensed physician who meets the

13 following requirements:

14 (1) The physician is qualified to handle com15 plications resulting from an incomplete abortion or

16 ectopic pregnancy.

17 (2) The physician has been trained to perform

18 surgical abortions and has met all applicable legal

19 requirements to perform such abortions.

20 (3) The physician is certified for ultrasound

21 dating of pregnancy and detecting ectopic preg22 nancy.

23 (4) The physician has completed a program re24 garding the prescribing of such drug that uses a

25 curriculum approved by the Secretary.
3

•S 3157 IS

1 (5) The physician has admitting privileges at a

2 hospital to which the physician can travel in one

3 hour or less, determined on the basis of starting at

4 the principal medical office of the physician and

5 traveling to the hospital, using the transportation

6 means normally used by the physician to travel to

7 the hospital, and under the average conditions of

8 travel for the physician.

Æ
Exhibit 35.2

Feb 28, 2014

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-5 (see Schedule A)



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 and of its performance under the Agreement (each of the agreement and the reconstitution
Agreement as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout
such reporting period (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the status thereof.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName: Lionel AntunesTitle: Vice President of Residential LendingDate: Feb. 28, 2014




---

<for SEMT 2012-5>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by Reconstitution Agreement dated October 30, 2012.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### State of Iowa v. Harvey Owens, Appellant.

Conviction: transoript of shorthand notes: *Review.*Where the clerk’s transcript fails to show that the notes of the shorthand reporter have been extended into long-hand or that a transcript thereof has been filed in the district court, and the attorney general denies that the evidence was properly preserved and made of record, appellant is required to furnish a transcript from the clerk establishing the fact; and in the absence of such transcript questions depending on the evidence cannot be considered.

*Appeal -from Davis District Court.*— HoN. F. W. Eichel- , BERGER, Judge,

*144Friday, October 6, 1899.

Due'ENdaNT was indicted, tried, and convicted of the crime of larceny, and from the judgment pronounced appeals.—

*Affirmed.*

*II. 0. Traverse*and *II. 0. Tailor*for appellant.

*Milton Remley,*Attorney General, and *D. II. Payne*for the State.

Deemer, J.

The attorney general calls our attention to the fact that no bill of exceptions was ever prepared and signed, that there has never been any transcript of the shorthand reporter’s notes filed in the district court, and that the evidence has not been preserved and filed as required by law. An examination of the clerk’s transcript, which has been certified to this court, discloses the fact that the trial judge signed a skeleton bill of exceptions, in which he certified that the notes of the shorthand reporter filed in the district court on September 16, 1898, together with the exhibits and documentary evidence therein referred to, contain all the evidence adduced upon the trial. It does not appear, however, that these notes have been extended into' longhand, or that a transcript thereof has at any time been filed in the district court. If any such transcript was filed, it has not been certified to this court. As the attorney general has specifically denied that the evidence was properly preserved and made of record, appellant is required, under the rules, to furnish a transcript from the clerk establishing the fact. We cannot consider any question depending on the evidence adduced. All questions argued by appellant, save one relating to the instructions, involve rulings on evidence, and the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. The instruction complained of is correct as an abstract proposition of law. Whether or not it was applicable to the proven facts, we cannot deter*145mine. We have examined the whole record with care, and discover no prejudicial error. The judgment of the district court is AEEIRMED.
#### Razall, Plaintiff, vs. Razall, Defendant and Appellant: Kelley, Administrator, Respondent.

*June 7*

July *12, 1949.*

*Bernard F. Mathiowets*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Charles E. Ham-mersley,*attorney, and *Jeremiah J. Kelly,*divorce counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Hammersley.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The first contention of the respondent in this case is that the *order is not*an appealable order.

After recitals the order is as follows:

> *220“It is ordered and adjudged, that the alimony which is accrued and which is now unpaid comprises amounts of thirty-five ($35) dollars each, which became due and payable on the first and fifteenth days of each month beginning with February 1, 1942, and ending with February 1, 1948, such payments aggregating five thousand seventy-five ($5,075) dollars, that said sum was due to the deceased plaintiff at the time of her death; no part of which has been paid; that in addition thereto the defendant is in arrears in the amount of thirty-two and 70/100 ($32.70) dollars for disbursements incurred by the plaintiff, payable June 4, 1942, with interest if any is allowable thereon according to law.

> “It is further ordered and adjudged, that the petitioner may take such other remedies for the collection of said arrears as he may have under the law.”

This is neither an order nor a judgment. While couched in the language of a judgment it is nothing but a finding of fact and is not appealable either as an order or a judgment. It does not affect a substantial right, determine the action, or prevent a judgment from which an appeal might be taken. Neither is it a final order upon a summary application in an action after judgment. It adjudicates nothing.

No appeals lie from findings of fact. *Estate of Lewis*(1932), 207 Wis. 155, 240 N. W. 818; *Witt v. Wonser*(1928), 195 Wis. 593, 219 N. W. 344; *Dawley v. Dawley*(1944), 246 Wis. 306, 16 N. W. (2d) 827; *Gertz v. Gertz*(1948), 252 Wis. 286, 31 N. W. (2d) 620.

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
# L_2012334EN.01005201.xml

| 6.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 334/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 334/52

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Decision 2012/729/EU of 23 November 2012 amending Decision 2008/866/EC, on emergency measures suspending imports from Peru of certain bivalve molluscs intended for human consumption, as regards its period of application

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 327 of 27 November 2012
  )

On page 56, the title should read as follows:

for:

‘Commission Implementing Decision of 23 November 2012 amending Decision 2008/866/EC, on emergency measures suspending imports from Peru of certain bivalve molluscs intended for human consumption, as regards its period of application

(notified under document C(2012) 8459)

(Text with EEA relevance)’,

read:

‘Commission Implementing Decision of 23 November 2012 amending Decision 2008/866/EC, on emergency measures suspending imports from Peru of certain bivalve molluscs intended for human consumption, as regards its period of application

(notified under document C(2012) 8459)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2012/729/EU)’.

---
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 9, 2024 / Presidential Documents 81821 

Proclamation 10832 of October 4, 2024 

German-American Day, 2024 

By the President of the United States of America 

A Proclamation 

In 1683, 13 families left the only home they had ever known to flee religious 

persecution and start new lives in America, establishing the first German 

settlement just outside Philadelphia. On German-American Day, we celebrate 

the history, culture, and countless contributions of our Nation’s 40 million 

German Americans. 

The hard work, achievements, and sacrifices of German Americans have 

shaped the very idea of America. German-American immigrants established 

some of our Nation’s earliest and most extensive newspapers, advancing 

the role of the free press in America. German-American scholars and writers, 

scientists and musicians, and leaders in every sector are the source of 

some of America’s best ideas and most exciting possibilities. And today, 

German Americans are not only a proud part of our country’s character, 

but they also tie us closer to Germany and its people. 

My Administration is committed to growing the friendship, allyship, and 

partnership between Germany and the United States. This month, I will 

be traveling to Germany to meet with their leaders and coordinate on shared 

priorities like securing democracy around the world, countering antisemitism 

and other forms of hatred, and advancing cooperation on economics, trade, 

and technology. We will also continue to stand together to support the 

brave people of Ukraine in their defense against Russian aggression. 

Today, may we celebrate the culture and bonds German Americans have 

built over the hundreds of years they have called this country home. Together, 

may we recommit to fighting for a better future, full of new possibilities 

for our Nation. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States 

of America, do hereby proclaim October 6, 2024, as German-American Day. 

I urge all Americans to celebrate the rich and varied history of German 

Americans and remember the many contributions they have made to our 

Nation. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOC3
81822 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 9, 2024 / Presidential Documents 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this fourth day 

of October, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-four, and of the 

Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and fortyninth. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23457 

Filed 10–8–24; 8:45 am] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOC3BIDEN.EPS</GPH>