alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ISIDRO JONES, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-2108

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed September 12, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas 

County; Philip J. Federico, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender and 

Jean-Jacques A. Darius, Special Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Helene S. Parnes, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and SILBERMAN and LUCAS, JJ., Concur.
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C SECTION 1350)



In connection with the Annual Report of
Dominion Minerals Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2017 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Pinchas Althaus, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: May 17, 2018 | By: | /s/ Pinchas Althaus    
|------------------ | --- | -----------------------
|                   |     | Pinchas Althaus        
|                   |     | Chief Executive Officer
#### The State of Iowa v. Cyrus Vermillion and David Gregory, Appellants.

Criminal Law: defective abstract: review on appeal. Exceptions to the admission of evidence which might he admissible under some circumstances, to the giving of instructions abstractly correct hut claimed to he erroneous as applied to the facts at bar, and to the court’s permitting the shorthand notes of the evidence tobe read to .the jury after retirement, will not be considered on appeal when the abstract does not contain the evidence, and fails to state when said notes were read to the jury. (2)

*Appeal from Mahaska District Court.*— Hon. A. E. Dewey, Judge.

Monday, January 29, 1894.

Indictment for larceny. Verdict of guilty, and •& judgment from which the defendants appeals.—

*Affirmed.*

*J. C. Williams*and *W. 8. Kenworthy*for appellants. '

*B. W. Preston*and *Thos. A. Cheshire,*with *John T. Stone,*Attorney G-eneral, for the state.

GIeangeb, C. J.

I. The larceny charged is of a harness, from one Roberts. It seems that at about the same time there was a larceny of a harness from one Nelson, and from the argument of appellants it appears that there was testimony on the trial of this indictment as to the larceny of the Nelson harness, and appellants complain of the action of the court in that respect. The testimony is not in the abstract. It is not to be doubted but that the facts as to two separate larcenies might be so connected that, on the trial of an indictment for one, facts as to the other might be admissible. *58Of course, the fact that one larceny has been committed can not he shown as tending to prove the commission of another. As the testimony might be proper and the evidence is not in the record, we can not determine the question.

II. Complaint is made of several of the instructions given. They are, as abstract propositions of law, correct. We can only determine their correctness, as applied to the facts of this case, from the evidence, which, as we have said, is not before us. A party assigning error should put in the abstract the part of the record necessary for the consideration of the assignments. *State v. Grossheim,*79 Iowa, 75, 44 N. W. Rep. 541.

III. From the arguments, it appears that, after the-jury retired for deliberation, it came into court, and asked that the shorthand reporter read to it, from his notes, the testimony of two witnesses, and that the court permitted it, against objection. Without saying-that such a proceeding would be erroneous, we need only say that the abstract does not show such a state of facts. It does not show that the ‘‘shorthand reporter read only the evidence giyen in chief by the said witnesses W. J. Smith and Jacob Auer, and did not read the evidence given in cross-examination.” The-abstract does not show when this happened, and, judging from the record, it may have been before the-retirement of the jury, as is often done. The difficulty is that this case is before us with a skeleton bill of exceptions embodied in the abstract, instead of an abstract made from a completed bill of exceptions. In view of the record, we can not consider the points argued. Aefirmed,
Exhibit 4.7


                                SECOND AMENDMENT
                                       OF
                   KTLA INC. HOURLY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT PLAN

                        (Effective as of January 1, 1992)



                  WHEREAS, KTLA Inc. (the "Company") established KTLA Inc.

Hourly Employees' Retirement Plan (the "Plan") effective as of January 1, 1992;

and

                  WHEREAS, the Plan has been amended from time to time and

further amendment of the Plan is now considered desirable;


                  NOW, THEREFORE, by virtue and in exercise of the power

reserved to the Company by Section 12.1 of the Plan, the Plan be and it hereby

is further amended, effective January 1, 1998, as follows:


             1.   By adding the following at the end of Section 7.4 of the

Plan: "Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a Participant's vested account balance

at the time of distribution (or any prior distribution) exceeds $5,000,

distribution shall not be made to the Participant before he attains age 65

unless he consents thereto."

             2.   By substituting "$5,000" for "$3,500" wherever the latter

appears in Sections 7.4 and 7.5 of the Plan.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3194

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service

located at 431 North George Street in Millersville, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Robert S. Walker Post Office’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 3194 ES

1 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF ROBERT S. WALKER POST OF2 FICE.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The facility of the United States

4 Postal Service located at 431 North George Street in

5 Millersville, Pennsylvania, shall be known and designated

6 as the ‘‘Robert S. Walker Post Office’’.

7 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg8 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United

9 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall

10 be deemed to be a reference to the Robert S. Walker Post

11 Office.

Passed the Senate October 24 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3194

AN ACT

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 431 North George Street in

Millersville, Pennsylvania, as the ‘‘Robert S.Walker Post Office’’.
(1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 10, 2010
    By:
    /s/ William C. StoneWilliam C. StoneChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)Date: November 10, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Patrick J. PedontiPatrick J. PedontiSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extraced from the Form
10-KSB for the year ended April 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          APR-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-1999
<CASH>                                             422
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   422
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,434
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,000
<OTHER-SE>                                     (4,012)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       422
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,534
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (20)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,514)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,514)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.00)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.00)






</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10.24



[VERIDIEN LOGO]


This Agreement, made this 1st day of August, 1999 between Robert P. Belling,
hereinafter known as Belling, and Veridien Corporation, hereinafter known as
Veridien.

Now, therefore, in consideration of the promises herein, it is agreed as
follows:

That Belling will provide consulting services to Veridien for an unspecified
period of time to analyze their product line, review their prior and current
marketing activities, and develop a comprehensive marketing plan with specific
short and long range goals and objectives, and assist in the implementation
thereof. To facilitate this process, Veridien agrees to provide Belling access
to any and all files and personnel necessary to obtain the necessary
information required to complete the plan.

Veridien agrees to pay Belling a consulting fee of $8,000 per month plus all
expenses commencing August 1, 1999. Such fee shall be paid twice monthly in
equal payments of $4,000 each, in addition to reimbursement for any and all
expenses incurred.

In addition, Belling will also engage in marketing activities to sell Veridien
products to selected large accounts, mutually agreed to by Veridien.
Commissions on gross sales volume will be based on the following schedule:

<TABLE>

         <S>                        <C>
         Up to $1,000,000           5%
         $1,000,001 - $2,000,000    4%
         $2,000,001 - $3,000,000    3%
         $3,000,001 - $4,000,000    2%
         $4,000,001 - +             1%
</TABLE>


Belling is an independent consultant and shall be individually responsible for
his income taxes, both state and federal, FICA and any other taxes.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.

<TABLE>
<S>                                         <C>
CONSULTANT                                  VERIDIEN CORPORATION

By: /s/ Robert P. Belling                   By: /s/ Andrew T. Libby
    -----------------------                    -------------------------
        Robert P. Belling                           Andrew T. Libby
                                                    Executive VP and COO

Witness: /s/ Cheryl Ballou                  Witness: /s/ Cheryl Ballou
        -------------------                        ---------------------

Name:        Cheryl Ballou                  Name:        Cheryl Ballou
      ---------------------                      -----------------------
</TABLE>
Sewage 

Sludge

3-h EC50 _

Sewage 

Sludge

_ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for SAR 

chemical class = MW with unknown mp (P); log Kow = 5.4 (P); S 

= 1 mg/L at 20 C (M); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and 

mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) 

Acute 

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb) Chronic

1

SARs

SAR Class

TSCA New Chemcial 

Category 

; 

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: 

 Fate assessor: Ecotox assessor: Health assessor:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Dana S. Philbrook, hereby certify that:

(1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Service Bancorp, Inc.;

(2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

(3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

(4) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; and

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and

(5) The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability
to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal controls over financial reporting.



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Dana S. Philbrook  
|Dana S. Philbrook      
|Chief Financial Officer

September 15, 2006
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 32.1



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        I, Patricia A. Costante, Chief Executive Officer of The MIIX Group,
Incorporated (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
(1) the Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended December 31, 2003
(the "Form 10-K"), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2)
the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: November 15, 2004


/s/ Patricia A. Costante
--------------------------------------
Name:   Patricia A. Costante
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
#### Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Company, Appellant, vs. Parker, Respondent.*

*February 2*

March *2, 1954.*

*180For the appellant there were briefs by *McLeod & Donohue,*and oral argument by *Raymond R. Colwin,*all of Fond du Lac.

*181For the respondent there was a brief by *Benton, Bosser, Becker & Fulton,*and oral argument by *Franklin L. Nehs,*all of Appleton.

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 costs, on May 4, 1954.

Broadfoot, J.

It is conceded that the parties were joint adventurers. A joint adventure is similar to a partnership but is usually confined in its scope to a single transaction. *Barry v. Kern,*184 Wis. 266, 199 N. W. 77. A joint adventure is a voluntary relationship which is based wholly on contract. This contract need not be a formal one but may be implied from the acts, statements, and conduct of the parties. “Joint adventurers may of course by contract fix their rights as they choose, and when a contract is made their rights are as fixed by it.” *Estate of Week,*204 Wis. 178, 179, 235 N. W. 448.

No bill of exceptions containing the evidence presented at the trial is before us. In the absence of a bill of exceptions, if the findings sustain the judgment it must be affirmed. Finding number 8 by the trial court was as follows :

> “That prior to the making of said payment by the plaintiff to the said Charles Hintz as aforesaid a full and final division of profits had been made and concluded by and between the said Chas. A. Green & Son and the defendant Lee H. Parker for and on account of their said agreement and venture.”

In the absence of an express agreement the laws relating to partnerships apply to joint adventurers. *Reinig v. Nelson,*199 Wis. 482, 227 N. W. 14.

> “The general rule that an account stated is binding in the absence of fraud or mistake is applicable to accounts stated between partners, so that after partners have mutually stated and adjusted an account it will not be reopened except for fraud, mistake, or duress, but the account must have been agreed to or. acquiesced in by the partners.” 40 Am. Jur., Partnership, p. 376, sec. 352.

*182Green knew of the accident at the time of the settlement made with Parker. There is no claim made of fraud, mistake, or duress, and it must be assumed from the finding that this item was considered and embodied in the full and final division of profits and in the accounting that led thereto. We must assume also that their settlement was made pursuant to their contract, with which both parties were familiar, and was made in accordance therewith. Thus, Green could have no further claim against the defendant. The plaintiff’s rights, if any, are by way of subrogation to the claim of Green. Green’s claim had been liquidated by the full and complete settlement, and accordingly the plaintiff has no claim against the defendant.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
EX-35.1
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES


OFFICER CERTIFICATE

Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2012-C6


March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.


PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland