alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of EZJR, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), I, Barry Hall, Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, to the best of my knowledge and belief, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

i.	The Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

ii.	The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 20, 2015





/s/ Barry Hall

Barry Hall, Executive Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer

|(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# L_2012305EN.01002601.xml

| 1.11.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 305/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.11.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 305/26

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 October 2012

appointing a Greek member and a Greek alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2012/676/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the Greek Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Panagiotis PSOMIADIS. An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Spyridon SPYRIDON as a member of the Committee of the Regions, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Panagiotis PSOMIADIS. An alternate member’s seat will become vacant following the appointment of Mr Spyridon SPYRIDON as a member of the Committee of the Regions,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Spyridon SPYRIDON, Περιφερειακός Σύμβουλος Αττικής; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Spyridon SPYRIDON, Περιφερειακός Σύμβουλος Αττικής;

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Dimitrios PETROVITS, Περιφερειακός Σύμβουλος Ανατολικής Μακεδονίας-Θράκης. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Dimitrios PETROVITS, Περιφερειακός Σύμβουλος Ανατολικής Μακεδονίας-Θράκης.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 October 2012.

For the Council

The President

E. FLOURENTZOU

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
#### O’Leary, Respondent, vs. Hannaford, Appellant.

*November 8*—

December *5, 1950.*

*147For the appellant there was a brief by *Kivett & Kasdorj*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Austin W. Kivett.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Hess, Chernov & Gordon*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Ben L. Chernov.*

Hughes, J.

A practical mind might question whether the amount involved and the moral issue justify the expense of this protracted litigation. The majority of the court is of the opinion that litigants should be unhampered and not discouraged. On this point there appears to be some authority. *Kopplin v. Quade*(1911), 145 Wis. 454, 130 N. W. 511.

The evidence in this case was in dispute, and sustains the civil court’s finding that there was an oral agreement that defendant would pay plaintiff for his services as a court reporter. In view of this finding the amounts due the plaintiff *148were certain and stated. His act of cashing a check marked “in full” did not constitute an accord and satisfaction.

The first item in plaintiff’s account upon which this suit was brought was $11.60 earned in 1940. The suit not having been brought until 1948, the statute of limitations, sec. 330.19 (3), had run and the court should have disallowed that amount. The judgment is modified by deducting such amount therefrom. The respondent is entitled to costs.

*By the Court.*— Judgment modified by deducting $11.60 therefrom and, as so modified, is affirmed.
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE



The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among,  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,  U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Situs Holdings, LLC,  as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from October 18, 2012 (the “Closing Date”) to December 31, 2012 and of such Certifying Servicer’s
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects from the Closing Date to the end of such calendar year.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 11, 2013
---

Exhibit 99.19

CONSENT OF ENGINEER

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the
undersigned companys name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual
Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report
entitled Mineral Resource Estimate On The J Zone Uranium Deposit, Waterbury
Lake Property dated September 6, 2013 and (2) all other references to the
undersigned company included or incorporated by reference in the registration
statement in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp.



Dated: March 12, 2015



/s/ Alan SextonAlan Sexton, M.Sc.,
P.Geol.

---
# L_2012334EN.01005001.xml

| 6.12.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 334/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.12.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 334/50

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK

of 29 November 2012

on the approval of the volume of coin issuance in 2013

(ECB/2012/26)

(2012/754/EU)

THE GOVERNING COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 128(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States whose currency is the euro. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Central Bank (ECB) has the exclusive right from 1 January 1999 to approve the volume of coins issued by the Member States whose currency is the euro.

| (2) | The Member States whose currency is the euro have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2013, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Member States whose currency is the euro have submitted to the ECB for approval their estimates of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2013, supplemented by explanatory notes on the forecasting methodology,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Approval of the volume of euro coins to be issued in 2013

The ECB hereby approves the volume of euro coins to be issued by the Member States whose currency is the euro in 2013 as described in the following table:

| (EUR million) |
| --- |
| | Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins (not intended for circulation) in 2013 |
| Belgium | 149,9 |
| Germany | 758,0 |
| Estonia | 10,1 |
| Ireland | 48,4 |
| Greece | 8,9 |
| Spain | 230,0 |
| France | 300,0 |
| Italy | 101,5 |
| Cyprus | 7,1 |
| Luxembourg | 40,0 |
| Malta | 8,1 |
| Netherlands | 63,8 |
| Austria | 253,0 |
| Portugal | 17,2 |
| Slovenia | 15,0 |
| Slovakia | 21,4 |
| Finland | 60,0 |

(EUR million)

Issuance of coins intended for circulation and issuance of collector coins (not intended for circulation) in 2013

Belgium

149,9

Germany

758,0

Estonia

10,1

Ireland

48,4

Greece

8,9

Spain

230,0

France

300,0

Italy

101,5

Cyprus

7,1

Luxembourg

40,0

Malta

8,1

Netherlands

63,8

Austria

253,0

Portugal

17,2

Slovenia

15,0

Slovakia

21,4

Finland

60,0

Article 2

Final provision

This Decision is addressed to the Member States whose currency is the euro.

Done at Frankfurt am Main, 29 November 2012.

The President of the ECB

Mario DRAGHI

---
#### Christnovich, Appellant, vs. Industrial Commission and others, Respondents.

*May 4*

June *6, 1950.*

*236
      *Stephen J. Hajduch*of Milwaukee, for the appellant.

For the respondent Industrial Commission there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Mortimer Levitan,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. Levitan.*

Gehl, J.

Appellant contends that upon his petition for a review by the whole commission it should have made an express finding with respect to his claimed back injury, that it should have retained jurisdiction to determine whether there was a back injury, and that it should have taken additional testimony.

*237It will be observed that the applicant made a claim for an injury both to his right hip and his back; that he thereby presented to the commission a claim based upon an alleged injury to his back. His entire claim was presented to the commission as it is required to be.

“When the employee suffers an accident he has but one cause of action for compensation for all injury and disability sustained as the result thereof, and his claim therefor is not severable. *R. I. Wilson Co. v. Industrial Comm.*219 Wis. 463, 263 N. W. 204; *A. D. Thomson Co. v. Industrial Comm.*222 Wis. 445, 450, 268 N. W. 113, 269 N. W. 253. When the commission makes findings and a final award, it is not passing upon merely the employee’s right to compensation for certain claimed or then known injuries. It is passing upon all compensation payable for all injuries caused by that accident.” *State ex rel. Watter v. Industrial Comm.*233 Wis. 48, 52, 287 N. W. 692.

The mere fact that the applicant in his original petition stated that his claim was based in part upon his back injury presented that feature of his claim to the commission and it was considered by the commission in making its award. The commission having determined that there was an injury only to the right hip it was not necessary that it make a specific finding as to the back injury.

From the finding that the permanent partial disability sustained by the applicant was at the hip, the inference necessarily follows that it was determined that he sustained no disability to any other portion of his body.

There was ample testimony to support the implied finding of the commission that applicant had suffered no compensable disability to his back.

Applicant contends that the commission should not have entered a final award but should have ordered the taking of additional testimony. The taking of additional testimony on petition for a review of an examiner’s findings and order *238is a matter for the sole discretion of the commission. *Spenle v. Industrial Comm.*232 Wis. 506, 287 N. W. 690; *Woodside School Dist. v. Industrial Comm.*241 Wis. 469, 475, 476, 6 N. W. (2d) 182.

Applicant’s petition has been fully considered, and under the rule of *State ex rel. Watter v. Industrial Comm., supra,*the judgment must be affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos.333-72250, 333-37062, 333-43370, 333-43372, 333-43376, 333-45766, 333-82369, 333-82383, 333-82381,333-82711, and 333-115457) of S1 Corporation of our report dated February 29, 2008 relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness ofinternal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
#### Kaestner, Executor, Appellant, vs. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance Company, Limited, Mutual, and another, Respondents.

*November 15*

December *15, 1948.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Cyril C. Foster,*attorney, and *Ralph J. Drought*of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Drought.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Anderson & Murphy,*attorneys, and *J. Stewart Murphy*of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *J. Stewart Murphy.*

*18Fairchild, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *Kaestner v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co., ante,*p. 12, 35 N. W. (2d) 190, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed with directions to grant a new trial.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23629]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1262]


Notice of Approval of Product Under Voucher: Rare Pediatric 
Disease Priority Review Voucher; TREMFYA (guselkumab)

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of approval of a product redeeming a priority review voucher. 
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to 
award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric 
disease product applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is 
required to publish notice of the issuance of priority review vouchers 
as well as the approval of products redeeming a priority review 
voucher. FDA has determined that the supplemental application for 
TREMFYA (guselkumab), approved September 11, 2024, meets the criteria 
for redeeming a priority review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathryn Lee, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1394, email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#185b796c706a617636547d7d587e7c793670706b367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="85c6e4f1edf7fcebabc9e0e0c5e3e1e4abededf6abe2eaf3">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the approval of a product 
redeeming a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher. Under 
section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360ff), FDA will report the 
issuance of rare pediatric disease priority review vouchers and the 
approval of products for which a voucher was redeemed. FDA has 
determined that the supplemental application for TREMFYA (guselkumab) 
meets the redemption criteria.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further 
information about TREMFYA (guselkumab), go to the ``Drugs@FDA'' website 
at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.

    Dated: October 8, 2024.
Eric Flamm,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23629 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23311]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer 
Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jose Cintron-Santiago at 1-888-912-
1227 or 787-522-8607.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications 
Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024, at 1:00 
p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Jose Cintron-Santiago. For more information, please contact 
Jose Cintron-Santiago at 1-888-912-1227 or 787-522-8607, or write TAP 
Office, 48 Carr 165 Suite 2000, Guaynabo, PR 00968-8000 or contact us 
at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include TAP 
2024 committee project focus areas.

    Dated: October 1, 2024.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2024-23311 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Exhibit 32

    CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ameriwest Minerals Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William J. Muran, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ William J. Muran
----------------------------------
William J. Muran
Chief Executive Officer &
Chief Financial Officer
March 23, 2009


This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by
reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it
by reference.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6161 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6161

**Commission Decision of 08/04/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6161 - CLARIANT / SÜD-CHEMIE) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels ,08/04/2011

C(2011) 2595 final

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6161 – CLARIANT/ SÜD-CHEMIE Notification of 10/03/2011 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 88, 19/03/2011, p.35.

1. On 10/03/2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Clariant AG (Swizterland), and Clariant Verwaltungsgesellschaft mbH (Germany) the latter belonging to the Clariant AG group, acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Süd-Chemie AG (Germany) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Clariant AG : manufacture and marketing of specialty chemicals.

- for Süd-Chemie AG : manufacture and marketing of specialty chemicals in the areas of

adsorbents and catalysts.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.