alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Daniel R. Fishback, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DemandTec, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986]c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: January 11, 2008
    
    /s/ Daniel R. Fishback

Daniel R. FishbackPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Tablegate Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2012 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 11, 2013
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 200 (Wednesday, October 16, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83519-83520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23818]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: 24-071]


Earth Science Advisory Committee

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the

[[Page 83520]]

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a 
meeting of the Earth Science Advisory Committee (ESAC).

DATES: Monday, October 28, 2024, 12-1:30 p.m. All times are eastern 
time.

ADDRESSES: Public attendance will be virtual only. See dial-in and 
Webinar information below under Supplementary Information.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lucia Tsaoussi, Designated Federal 
Officer, Earth Scince Advisory Committee, NASA Headquarters, 
Washington, DC 20546, via email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#266a53454f47085508725547495355554f664847554708414950"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e0ac95838981ce93ceb493818f95939389a08e819381ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-
358-4471.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As noted above, this meeting will be open to 
the public via Webinar and telephonically. Webinar connectivity 
information is provided below. For audio, when you join the Webinar 
event, you may use your computer or provide your phone number to 
receive a call back, otherwise, call the U.S. toll conference number 
listed. On Monday, October 28, 2024, the event address for attendees 
is: webinar web link https://nasaenterprise.webex.com/nasaenterprise/j.php?MTID=m920ce633f73c0ef6da75b961fbc484a8.
    The webinar number is 2830 385 0130 and the webinar password is 
u4sWmR8XZ@4. If needed, the U.S. toll conference number is 1-929-251-
9612 or 1-213-269-5091 and access code is 2830 385 0130 and password is 
84796789.
    The agenda for the meeting includes the following topic:

--Earth Science Program Annual Performance Review According to the 
Government Performance and Results Act Modernization Act

    It is imperative that these meeting be held on these days to 
accommodate the scheduling priorities of the key participants.
    For more information, please visit https://science.nasa.gov/researchers/nac/science-advisory-committees/esac/.

Jamie M. Krauk,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-23818 Filed 10-15-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

December 5, 2016

No. 04

- 16

- 00698

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF R.R.A.

,

From the 166th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015PA02475

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant’s motion for extension of time to file a brief is granted. We order appellant’s

brief due December 27, 2016.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

cour t on this 5th day of December, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# L_2011332DE.01002602.xml

| 15.12.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 332/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.12.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 332/26

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 917/2011 des Rates vom 12. September 2011 zur Einführung eines endgültigen Antidumpingzolls und zur endgültigen Vereinnahmung des vorläufigen Zolls auf die Einfuhren von Keramikfliesen mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 238 vom 15. September 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 238 vom 15. September 2011

Seite 18, Artikel 1:

anstatt:

„Es wird ein vorläufiger Antidumpingzoll eingeführt ...“

muss es heißen:

„Es wird ein endgültiger Antidumpingzoll eingeführt ...“

---
#### Charles Handorf, Appellant, v. Elizabeth Hoes and Frederick Hoes.

Boundaries: agkeement: adverse possession. Where adjoining land owners agree npon a division line and they and their grantees recognize the same for a period of more than thirty years, the rule of adverse possession applies.

*Appeal -from Marshall District Court.*— Hon. Obed Cas-well, Judge. •

Monday, June 1, 1903.

Action to determine the boundary line between the .parties, who are owners of adjoining tracts of land. Decree for defendants. Plaintiff *appeals,*

AMrmed.

*Anthony C. Daly*for appellant.

*C. II. Van Law*for appellees.

McClain, J.

More than thirty years before this action was brought the then owners of the two adjoining tracts of land referred to in this action agreed upon a line of cottonwood trees then planted as Marking the boundary line between their two tracts, and they and their grantees have ever since occupied up to the line thus indicated as their mutual boundary line. Counsel for appellant contends that by a subsequent survey it was discovered that the trees were not upon the true line according to the government survey but some distance therefrom, and seeks to have the title quieted to the strip between the so-called true boundary line and the line which had been recognized by mutual agreement. The strip of land in controversy embraces about two square acres in area. The case is so clearly one for the application of the rule of advefse pos*80session announced in *Miller v. Mills*County, 111 Iowa, 654, that further discussion would seem to be unnecessary. For a recent application of the rule announced in that case, which is quite pertinent to the case before us, see *O'Callaghan v.*Whisenand, 119 Iowa, 565.

The decree of the district court, which limited plaintiff to the boundary line fixed by agreement and long occupancy, is affirmed.
Exhibit 10.4(a)

 

	

    	
 
    	
Sydling Futures Management LLC
    1285 Avenue of the Americas, 13th Floor
   New York, NY 10019
    


 

June 26, 2014

 

Rajeev Patel

Winton Capital Management LLC

 

Re:                             Cavendish Futures Fund LLC

Sydling WNT Master Fund LLC

 

Dear Mr. Patel:

 

The Trading Advisory Agreement (the “Agreement”) among the above named funds, Sydling Futures Management LLC and Winton Capital Management Limited expires June 30, 2014.  Please accept this letter as a renewal of the Agreement and all terms for an additional twelve months to expire on June 30, 2015.

 

	
Best regards,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Jennifer Magro
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Jennifer Magro
Who We Are 

The Irradiated Material Examination and Testing (IMET) Facility, 

Building 3025E, was designed and built in 1950 as a hot cell facility. It 

is a block-and-brick structure with a two-story high bay and houses 

six heavily shielded cells and 60 shielded storage wells. It includes 

the Specimen Prep Lab (SPL) with its associated laboratory hood 

and glove boxes; an operating area, where control and monitoring 

instruments supporting the in-cell test equipment are staged; a 

utility corridor; a hot equipment storage area; a tank vault room; 

office space; a trucking area with access to the high bay; and 

an outside steel building for storage. Tests and examinations are 

conducted in six dedicated hot cells and in a laboratory hood or 

modified glove boxes in the SPL.

What We Do

• Physical and mechanical properties testing

• Examination of irradiated materials

• Irradiated specimen storage

• Sample preparation

In-Cell Capabilities

• Sample sorting and identification 

• Sample machining using a CNC milling machine 

 and diamond saws

• Furnace annealing 

• Automated welding 

• Ultrasonic cleaning 

• High-temperature, high-vacuum testing 

• Tensile testing with high-vacuum chamber option 

• Impact testing, fatigue and fracture toughness testing of 

 standard and subsize impact specimens

• Automated micro-hardness testing 

• Profilometry 

• Scanning Electron Microscopy (PhilipsXL30) 

 

Hot Cell Facility

Irradiated Material Examination and Testing Facility

ORNL is managed by UT-Battelle for the US Departments of Energy

Specifications

6 hot cells

Lead glass and mineral oil

High-density concrete 

used for front, rear, 

and top shielding

Process and service 

compressed gases, air, 

demineralized water, 

process water, recirculating 

heating and cooling water, 

steam, vacuum, and 

electrical services

Transfer drawers 

between cells 1-4

Master-slave manipulators

Wesley Keeton

Facility Manager 

865.574.0609
# L_2012154EN.01001101.xml

| 15.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 154/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 154/11

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 May 2012

designating the European Capital of Culture for the year 2016 in Spain and Poland

(2012/309/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Decision No 1622/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 2006 establishing a Community action for the European Capital of Culture event for the years 2007 to 2019 (1), and in particular Article 9(3) thereof,

Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission,

Having regard to the Selection Panel report of June 2011 regarding the selection process of the European Capitals of Culture in Spain and Poland respectively,

Whereas:

Considering that the criteria referred to in Article 4 of Decision No 1622/2006/EC are entirely fulfilled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Donostia-San Sebastián and Wroclaw are designated as ‘European Capitals of Culture 2016’ in Spain and Poland.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 May 2012.

For the Council

The President

U. ELBÆK

---

(1)  
  OJ L 304, 3.11.2006, p. 1.

1

---
CERTIFICATION
OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF


CORPORATE
EQUITY INVESTMENTS, INC.


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


§
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Capital Equity Finance, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Chad B. Beemer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, do hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, based on my knowledge, that:





1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/S/ Chad
B. Beemer





Chad
B. Beemer


Chief
Financial Officer


November
23, 2009





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lindsay Gorrill, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Star Gold Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the quarter  ended July 31, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Lindsay GorrillName:Lindsay GorrillTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:September 14, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Beltz *v.*Garrison, Appellant, (No. 2).

Argued May 8, 1916.

Appeal, No. 33, Oct. T., 1916, by defendants, from decree of C. P. Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1915, No. 1116, in equity, for plaintiff on bill in equity for accounting in case of John Beltz v. Samuel Garrison, H. L. Williams, J. E. McGinness, P. E. McGillich, George H. Fritch, William I. N. Lofland and Great Western Lead Manufacturing Co.

Before Brown, C. J., Potteb, Mosohziskeb, Feazee and Walling, JJ.

Affirmed.

*Joseph Stadfeld,*for appellant.

*Thomas Watson,*with him *S. S. Robertson,*for appellee.

May 23, 1916:

Pee Cueiam,

In an opinion filed herewith we have dismissed the appeal of the Great Western Lead Manufacturing Company from the decree of the court below, and have not been convinced that the present appeal calls for any disturbance of it.

Appeal.dismissed at appellant’s costs.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BRYNN WAYNE GRIFFIN,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF 

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ET AL.,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 42 WM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 23rd day of August, 2017, the Application for Leave to File 

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or 

Extraordinary Relief and the Application for Leave to File a Reply are DENIED.
FILED: October 3 , 2024

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

___________________
No. 2 4

- 1443

___________________ GERRY W. FOWLER, SR.

,

P laintiff

– Appell ant
,

v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVIC E ; ZALES CORP.

,

Defendant

– Appell ees

.

___________________

O R D E R

___________________ The court amends its opinion filed September 2 3 , 2024, as follows:

In the first line of the second page, the appellant ’ s name is corrected to rea d

“ Gerr y W. Fowler, Sr. ”

For the Court

/s/ Nwamaka Anowi, Clerk USCA4 Appeal: 24-1443 Doc: 14 Filed: 10/03/2024 Pg: 1 of 1
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 

Policy on Treatment of Stock Options in the Event of Retirement* 

 

	1)	For purposes of this policy, a non-employee member of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Idera”) will be deemed to have retired if: 


 

	 	a)	the non-employee director resigns from the Board or determines not to stand for reelection or is not nominated for reelection at a meeting of the stockholders and has served as a director for more than 10 years, or


  

	 	b)	the non-employee director does not stand for reelection or is not nominated for reelection due to the fact that he or she is or will be older than 75 at the end of such director’s term. 


 

	2)	For purposes of this policy, an employee of Idera will be deemed to have retired if the employee terminates his or her employment with Idera, has been an employee of Idera for more than 10 years and is older than
65 upon termination of employment. 

  

	3)	If a non-employee director or employee retires, then (i) all outstanding options will automatically vest in full and (ii) the period during which the director or employee may exercise the options will be
extended to the expiration of the option under the plan. 

  

	*	Approved by the Board of Directors on April 28, 2014.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 7569** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. RANDELL BRICE HARRIS, a/k/a Randall Brice Harris , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte
. Max O. Cogburn, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:94

- cr - 00012

- MOC

- 2; 3:15

- cv - 00304

- MOC )

Submitted : January 17, 2017 Decided: January 20, 2017

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and KING , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Randell Brice Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth Margaret Greenough, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublis hed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Randell Brice Harris seeks to appeal the district court’s order and judgment denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice o r judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district cour t denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the d enial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Harris has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED