___________

No. 96-2690

___________

In the Matter of: Missouri *

Towing & FR&R Leasing, a *

general partnership; Jefferson *

Barracks Marine Service, Inc., *

a corporation for exoneration *

from, or limitation of, *

liability, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Appellees, * Eastern District of Missouri.

*

v. * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Tammy Lynn Strange, As *

independent administrator of *

the Estate of Mark E. Strange, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

 Submitted: January 29, 1997

 Filed: February 12, 1997

___________

Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

This case arises from the accidental drowning of Mark Strange,

a barge cleaner employed by appellee Jefferson Barracks Marine

Service, Inc. In 1992, Strange and fellow employees John Moore and

Mike Burris were cleaning a coal barge located in the Mississippi

River when Strange collapsed and fell overboard; three days later,

the Coast Guard discovered his body without a life jacket several

miles downstream. Appellees, owners of the tugboat that

transported the barge cleaners to the coal barge, filed a complaint

under the Limitation of Vessel Owner's Liability Act, 46 U.S.C.

§§ 181-195, seeking exoneration from liability for Strange's death.
 The Honorable Catherine D. Perry, United States District 1

Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

Strange's wife, child, and estate (claimants) filed claims against

the tugboat owners in the limitation proceeding, pursuant to

section 5(b) of the Federal Longshore and Harbor Workers'

Compensation Act, 33 U.S.C. § 905(b). The district court granted 1

the tugboat owners' subsequent motion for summary judgment, and

claimants now appeal.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, applying the

same standard as the district court. See Earnest v. Courtney, 64

F.3d 365, 366-67 (8th Cir. 1995) (per curiam). Under section

905(b), longshoremen may bring a cause of action against vessel

owners whose negligence caused death or injury. See 33 U.S.C.

§ 905(b); Scindia Steam Nav. Co. v. De Los Santos, 451 U.S. 156,

167-68 (1981); see also Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Pfeifer,

462 U.S. 523, 531 (1983). The duties of care vessel owners owe

longshoremen include a "turnover duty," which requires upon

commencement of stevedoring operations that the ship's condition be

such that an expert and experienced stevedore exercising reasonable

care can perform its operations with reasonable safety, and that a

shipowner warn the stevedore of hidden hazards. Howlett v.

Birkdale Shipping Co., 512 U.S. 92, 98 (1994); Scindia Steam, 451

U.S. at 167-78.

Claimants argued the tugboat owners breached their turnover

duty by failing to equip the tugboat with life jackets. Assuming,

without deciding, that the tugboat owners had such an obligation,

we conclude the undisputed evidence fails to demonstrate that the

tugboat owners breached it. The uncontradicted testimony of Moore

and Burris--the only eyewitnesses--was that company policy required

employees to wear life jackets while on barges, the tugboat was
-3-

typically equipped with life jackets, and Strange was wearing a

life jacket prior to falling overboard to his death. The absence
-4-

of a life jacket when Strange's body was recovered does not refute,

nor is even necessarily inconsistent with, the eyewitness accounts

so as to preclude summary judgment. See Moody v. St. Charles

County, 23 F.3d 1410, 1412 (8th Cir. 1994). 

Accordingly, we affirm. 

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.