alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 35.1

SERVICERS CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE

Re: Assessment of compliance for services provided pursuant to the Master Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated February 27, 2007, the Series Supplement,
dated October 3, 2012, the US$ Note Trust Deed, dated October 8, 2012, and other transaction documents relating to SMART ABS Series 2012-4US Trust (collectively, the Agreements).

The undersigned hereby certifies that:



| | 1. | I, Karleen Munns, am a Director of Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited (the Servicer).
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the Servicers activities during the period from April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance under each of the Agreements has been
made under my supervision.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under each of the Agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|Date: 24 June 2015           
|                             
|/s/ Karleen Munns            
|Karleen Munns                
|Director                     
|                             
|Macquarie Leasing Pty Limited
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

s1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139822 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139822 

 COA: 293895 

Roscommon CC: 09-005789-FH 

DENNIS ALLEN VOSHELL, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 7, 2009 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of LaPorte Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                |  |                                                     
|--------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|August 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Lee A. Brady                                    
|Date            |  | Lee A. Brady                                        
|                |  | President and Chief Executive Officer               
|                |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                               
|                | 
|August 12, 2008 |  | /s/ Michele M. Thompson                             
|Date            |  | Michele M. Thompson                                 
|                |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|                |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                               

This certification accompanies each report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



37
### Fw: w126 Ron Evans to: Heidi

_ R.

_ King 11/05/2009 09:44 PM Cc: Kathy Kaufman, Amy Lamson, Pat Dolwick, Tricia Crabtree

Heidi, we looked into your question regarding the discrepancy between the number of counties exceeding a w126 standard of 7ppm-hrs in the previous analysis and in the current analysis. The difference is because EPA is proposing to change the rounding convention for ozone in this reconsideration. Previously, we had estimated the number of counties assuming that w126 estimates would be truncated. This time, we are consistent with the proposed convention by rounding. This results in a slightly higher number of nonattaining counties. Let me know if you have futher questions about this.

Ron Evans Leader, Air Benefit & Cost Group HEID/OAQPS/OAR/EPA Mail Drop C-439-02 919-541-5488 919-541-0839 fax
Exhibit 35.1



ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



This Compliance Certificate
is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of October 17,
2012, by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2012-C, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),
Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned
hereby certifies that:



1)	I am a duly authorized officer of the
Servicer.



2)	A review of the activities of the Servicer
from October 17, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance under
the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.



3)	Based on such review, the Servicer has,
to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant
Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed
this Compliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2013.





| | HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, as Servicer
| | ------------------------------------
| |                                     
| |                                     
| | By:                                 
| |                                     
| |
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report
of North Penn Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph F. McDonald, Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Date:
                          August
      13, 2010
                          
                          /s/
      Joseph F. McDonaldJoseph
      F. McDonaldChief
      Financial
Officer
Exhibit 34.2



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors, PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank,
National Association (Midland or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the commercial mortgage-backed securities
transactions (the Platform), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D), 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and
1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility
is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with
attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and
determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities
performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts
calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with
the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that Midland Loan Services complied with the aforementioned applicable
servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 1, 2013

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1100 Walnut, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106

T:
(816) 472 7921, F: (816) 218 1890, www.pwc.com/us
Page | 1 

LOUDON COUNTY, VIRGINIA 

City Code City

510035107 ALDIE

510095107 ARCOLA

510108107 ASHBURN

510205107 BLUEMONT

510808107 DULLES AIRPORT

511170107 HAMILTON

511240107 HILLSBORO

511440107 LEESBURG

511451107 LINCOLN

511470107 LOVETTSVILLE

511600107 MIDDLEBURG

511846107 PAEONIAN SPRINGS

511929107 PHILOMONT

511982107 POTOMAC FALLS

512000107 PURCELLVILLE

512130107 ROUND HILL

512293107 SOUTH RIDING

512345107 STERLING

512598107 WATERFORD
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 20180.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

Jack Acrey, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being twelve years in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor - bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
***Exhibit 32(ii)***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of Abakan Inc. for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, CostasTakkas, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge andbelief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: January 10­7, 2011

 

 

/s/ Costas Takkas                                 

Costas Takkas, Chief Financial Officer 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
OMB Control No. 2060-0586

EPA Form 5900-188

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 0.16 hours and welcomes suggestions for reducing this effort. Send comments (referencing OMB Control 

Number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S. EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, D.C. 20460.
David W. Webster 

THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS 

EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS 

OFFICE OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT 

2 51 Causeway Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02114-2136 

(617) 626-1200 FAX: (617) 626-1240 

July 9, 2012 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region I 

5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 

Boston, MA 02109-3912 

RE: CZM Federal Consistency Review of Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel 

General Permit (SVGP); Statewide. 

Dear Mr. Webster: 

The Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) is currendy reviewing your 

proposal for a NPDES Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (SVGP) to 

ensure consistency with CZM enforceable program policies. Our formal review began on 

December 22, 2011 and a consistency determination would ordinarily be issued no later than 

February 22, 2012. However, as per the Coastal Zone Management Act Federal Consistency 

Regulations at 15 CFR 930.41(b) and 310 CMR 21.06(3)(e), CZM cannot complete its review and 

issue a decision until all applicable licenses, permits, certifications and other authorizations have 

been issued. Our records indicate that the MassDEP Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the 

proposed permit has not yet been issued. 

The Coastal Zone Management Act Federal Consistency Regulations at 15 CFR 930.41(b) 

allow for a stay in the sixty day review period, if mutually agreed upon by both the applicant and the 

state agency. The permit review was previously extended to March 8, 2012 and July 16, 2012. In 

order to facilitate the required 401 Water Quality Certification, we propose a second extension of 

the review period until October 15, 2012. CZM will need copies and documentation of all the 

required final MassDEP authorizations prior to the expiration of the stay period. Please indicate 

your agreement to this schedule by signing below and returning this letter to my attention. 

If you have questions about the federal consistency review process, please contact me at the 

above address or (617) 626-1050. If you have questions about the technical review of this project, 

please contact Todd Callaghan at (617) 626-1233. 

DEVAL L. PATRICK GOVERNOR TIMOTHY P. MURRAY LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR RICHARD K. SUWVAN JR. SECRETARY BRUCE K. CARUSLE DIRECTOR 

www.mass.gowczm 
Sincerely, 

Robert L. Boeri 

Project Review Coordinator 

CZM# 8999, 9000 

Q-«N4v1 tr:Jk 

Agreed to by applicant 

David Webster 

U.S. EPA 

Cc: John Nagle, USEPA 

Bryant Fi.rrnin, DEP Worcester 

Todd Callaghan, CZM
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2942 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2942

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain 
         hydroelectric projects in the State of West Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission projects 
numbered 6901, 6902, and 7307, the Commission may, at the request of 
the licensee for each project, respectively, and after reasonable 
notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures 
under that section, extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive 
2-year periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) takes effect on the date of the 
expiration of the extension issued by the Commission before the date of 
the enactment of this Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 806).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of any of the projects described in 
subsection (a) expired before the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) the Commission shall reinstate the license effective as 
        of the date of its expiration; and
            (2) the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
        shall take effect on the expiration date.

            Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2942

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain 
         hydroelectric projects in the State of West Virginia.
```
Order entered December 17, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00555-CR

KENDRICK EUGENE MORROW, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court At Law No. 1

Kaufman County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 14-30443-CC-M

ORDER

This case was submitted on December 8, 2015. In appellant’s second issue, he 

complained the trial court erred when it ordered appellant arrested for an extraneous offense in 

the presence of the jury panel. In response to the issue, the State contacted the court reporter and 

arranged for a “corrected” record to be filed, and then argued the record showed the “arrest” was 

not in the jury’s presence. The Court now has before it appellant’s December 14, 2015 objection

to “corrected” reporter’s record. Appellant asserts that the proper procedure was not used in 

getting the “corrected” record, and asks that we remand the case to the trial court for findings 

pursuant to TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e)(3). We will treat the objection as a motion.
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.6(e), governs the procedure when there is a 

dispute about the accuracy of a reporter’s record.

The rule provides, The parties may agree to correct an inaccuracy in the reporter’s 

record...If the parties cannot agree on whether or how to correct the reporter’s record so 

that the text accurately discloses what occurred in the trial court...the trial court after 

notice and hearing-settle the dispute... If the dispute arises after the reporter’s record has 

been filed in the appellate court, that court may submit the dispute to the trial court for 

resolution.

Accordingly, we GRANT appellant’s motion as follows. 

We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing and to make findings regarding the 

following.

 Whether the court reporter can produce his notes of from the April 20, 2015 trial.

 If so, the trial court shall next determine whether the reporter’s record filed on 

July 6, 2015, accurately reflects the trial court proceedings.

 If the trial court determines the record filed on July 6, 2015 does not accurately 

reflect the April 20, 2015 proceedings the court shall next determine whether the 

“corrected” reporter’s record filed on December 1, 2015 accurately reflects the 

trial proceedings.

 If the court determines neither record accurately reflects the April 20, 2015 

proceedings it next shall determine whether an accurate record can be filed.

 If the court determines an accurate record cannot be prepared, the court shall 

determine whether appellant is at fault for the inability to file an accurate record 

and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record. 

We ORDER the trial court to file its findings, any supporting documentation, and any 

orders to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with this order. It shall be 

reinstated THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order or when the findings are received.

/s/DOUGLAS S. LANG

PRESIDING JUSTICE
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3610 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate the exemption 

of companies located in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and any other 

possession of the United States. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Ms. VELA ́ZQUEZ (for herself, Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California, and Mr. 

SERRANO) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate 

the exemption of companies located in Puerto Rico, the 

Virgin Islands, and any other possession of the United 

States. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Puerto Rico Investor 

5 Protection Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3610 IH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION. 

2 Section 6(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 

3 (15 U.S.C. 80a–6(a)) is amended by striking paragraph 

4 (1). 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS