### 75919 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 240 / Friday, December 13, 2013 / Notices

Mitigation Measures

In the Final Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement (Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS (DOE/EIS–0222, September 1, 1999) DOE identified specific mitigation measures, policies, and management controls that direct land use at Hanford. DOE committed to these mitigation measures, as documented in the Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS ROD (64 FR 61615 November 12, 1999), which were reaffirmed in the Supplement Analysis, Hanford Comprehensive Land-Use Plan EIS (EIS–0222–SA–02, June 2, 2008) and in the amended ROD (73 FR 55824, September 26, 2008). These mitigation measures will continue to be implemented, as applicable, for the tank waste retrieval and treatment activities discussed in the TC&WM EIS. The TC&WM EIS did not identify any mitigation measures for the short-term resource areas that are needed in addition to those in the Supplement Analysis, Hanford Comprehensive Land Use Plan EIS and its amended ROD.

DOE has continued to evaluate potential mitigation measures for the contaminated soil at Hanford for several years. Most recently, DOE published the Long-Range Deep Vadose Zone Program Plan in October 2010. This program plan summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding deep vadose zone remediation challenges beneath the Central Plateau at Hanford and DOE’s approach to solving these challenges. The challenges to implementing deep vadose zone remediation are the result of contaminant depth and spread; the presence of multiple contaminants and comingled waste chemistries; physical, chemical, and biological fate and transport mechanisms; uncertain contaminant behavior; limited availability and effectiveness of cleanup remedies; and the unknown efficacy of remediation performance over the periods and spatial scales needed for making decisions.

Nevertheless, all practicable means to avoid or minimize environmental harm for the decisions identified have been adopted. DOE will prepare and implement a Mitigation Action Plan toaddress long-term impact areas. Longterm mitigation measures related to SST closure will be refined and presented in the TC&WM EIS Mitigation Action Plan, which will be posted on the Hanford and DOE NEPA Web sites identified in

**ADDRESSES**

**.** DOE will periodically revisit and update the Mitigation Action Plan as appropriate prior to initiating actions pursuant to this ROD. Issued in Washington, DC, on December 6,
2013. David Huizenga, Senior Advisor for Environmental Management.
[FR Doc. 2013–29734 Filed 12–12–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6450–01–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[ER–FRL–9012–5]**

**Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability** 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202)
564–7146 or http://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements filed 12/02/2013 through 12/06/2013 pursuant to 40 CFR
1506.9.

Notice

Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters on EISs are available at: http:// www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ eisdata.html

. EIS No. 20130356, Final EIS, FRA, MS,

Tupelo Railroad Relocation Planning and Environmental Study, Review Period Ends: 01/13/2014, Contact: John Winkle 202–493–6067 EIS No. 20130357, Final EIS, FHWA, VA, Interstate 66 Corridor Tier 1 Final Environmental Impact Statement and Tier 1 Record of Decision, Contact: John Simkins 804–775–3347. Under MAP–21 section 1319, FHWA has issued a single FEIS and ROD. Therefore, the 30-day wait/review period under NEPA does not apply to this action EIS No. 20130358, Final EIS, FHWA, VA, Interstate 64 Peninsula, from Interstate 95 in the City of Richmond to Interstate 664, Review Period Ends: 01/27/2014, Contact: John Simkins
804–775–3320 EIS No. 20130359, Final EIS, AFS, CA,

Kelsey Peak Timber Sale and Fuelbreak Project, Review Period Ends: 01/27/2014, Contact: Jeff Jones
707–441–3553 EIS No. 20130360, Final EIS, USFS, AZ,

Rosemont Copper Project, Proposed Mining Operation, Review Period Ends: 01/29/2014, Contact: Mindy Vogel 520–388–8300 EIS No. 20130361, Draft Supplement,

USACE, MN, NorthMet Mining Project and Land Exchange, Comment Period Ends: 03/13/2014, Contact: Douglas Bruner 651–290–5378. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service are joint lead agencies for the above project. EIS No. 20130362, Final EIS, USFS, MT,

Montana Snowbowl Expansion, Review Period Ends: 01/21/2014, Contact: Tami Paulsen 406–329–3731 EIS No. 20130363, Draft EIS, DOI, 00,

PROGRAMMATIC—Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Natural Resources Damage Assessment, Phase III Early Restoration Plan, Comment Period Ends: 02/04/2014, Contact: Nanciann Regalado 678–296–6805 EIS No. 20130364, Final EIS, USFS, OR,

Tollgate Fuels Reduction, Review Period Ends: 01/13/2014, Contact: Kimpton Cooper 509–522–6009 EIS No. 20130365, Draft EIS, NMFS, CA,

Bay Delta Conservation Plan, Comment Period Ends: 04/14/2014, Contact: Ryan Wulff 916–930–3733 The U.S. Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation and Fish and Wildlife Service, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Marine Fisheries Service are joint lead agencies for the above project. EIS No. 20130366, Draft EIS, USACE,

LA, PROGRAMMATIC—Southwest Coastal Louisiana Project, Comment Period Ends: 01/27/2014, Contact: Nathan Dayan 504–862–2530

Dated: December 10, 2013. Cliff Rader, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013–29770 Filed 12–12–13; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION** 

**Sunshine Act Meetings**

Pursuant to the provisions of the ‘‘Government in the Sunshine Act’’ (5 U.S.C. 552b), notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s Board of Directors met in open session at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, December 10, 2013, to consider the following matters:

Discussion Agenda: Memorandum and resolution re: The Resolution of Systemically Important Financial Institutions: The Single Point of Entry Strategy.

In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Vice Chairman Thomas M. Hoenig, seconded by Director Jeremiah O. Norton (Appointive), concurred in by Director Thomas J. Curry (Comptroller of the Currency), Director Richard Cordray