alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
AND 15d-14(b)




(Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of China BCT Pharmacy Group, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief:




(1)           the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of the operation of the
Company.





Dated:
      May 20, 2010By:
            /s/
      Hui Tian TangHui
      Tian TangChief
      Executive Officer and Chairman





Dated:
      May 20,2010By:
            /s/
      Xiaoyan ZhangXiaoyan
      ZhangChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 31.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF


THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
Richard P. Smith, certify that:




1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Vitacost.com, Inc.;




2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;




4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:




a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its condensed
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;




b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):




a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and




b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.




/s/
      Richard P. SmithRichard
      P. SmithChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
            May 17, 2010
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

James Harold Moon, Appellant

No. 06-18-00128-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 336th District Court of 

Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR-17-

26337). Opinion delivered by Justice 

Burgess, Chief Justice Morriss and Justice 

Stevens participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find no error in the judgment of the court 

below. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, James Harold Moon, has adequately indicated his inability to 

pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED MAY 15, 2019

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
Exhibit 31.2

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Horst Balthes, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this 10-QSB for the period ending July 31, 2007 of Acropolis Precious Metals, Inc.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a. 	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. 	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. 	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. 	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date:   September 11, 2007 | HORST BALTHES                             
|-------------------------- | ------------------------------------------
|                           | Horst Balthes, Principal Financial Officer



---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3022 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3022

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain irrigation 
       facilities to the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Nampa and Meridian Conveyance Act''.

SEC. 2. CONVEYANCE OF FACILITIES.

    The Secretary of the Interior (in this Act referred to as the 
``Secretary'') shall, as soon as practicable after the date of 
enactment of this Act, convey facilities to the Nampa and Meridian 
Irrigation District (in this Act referred to as the ``District'') in 
accordance with all applicable laws and pursuant to the terms of the 
Memorandum of Agreement (contract No. 1425-99MA102500, dated 7 July 
1999) between the Secretary and the District. The conveyance of 
facilities shall include all right, title, and interest of the United 
States in and to any portion of the canals, laterals, drains, and any 
other portion of the water distribution and drainage system that is 
operated or maintained by the District for delivery of water to and 
drainage of water from lands within the boundaries of the District.

SEC. 3. LIABILITY.

    Except as otherwise provided by law, effective on the date of 
conveyance of facilities under this Act, the United States shall not be 
liable for damages of any kind arising out of any act, omission, or 
occurrence based on its prior ownership or operation of the conveyed 
property.

SEC. 4. EXISTING RIGHTS NOT AFFECTED.

    Nothing in this Act affects the rights of any person except as 
provided in this Act. No water rights shall be transferred, modified, 
or otherwise affected by the conveyance of facilities and interests to 
the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District under this Act. Such 
conveyance shall not affect or abrogate any provision of any contract 
executed by the United States or State law regarding any irrigation 
district's right to use water developed in the facilities conveyed.

            Passed the Senate October 13 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3022

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain irrigation 
       facilities to the Nampa and Meridian Irrigation District.
```
### ! Q u e e n C r e e k M a r i c o p a A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s

P i m a A s s o c i a t i o n o f G o v e r n m e n t s P i n a l G i l a

M

a r i c o p a

P i m a Y a v a p a i N a v a j o

G r a h a m

C

o c h i s eQueenCreek,Arizona



# 3

F e d e r a l H i g h w a y s A d m i n i s t r a t i o n O f f i c e o f P l a n n i n g

, E n v i r o n m e n t

, a n d R e a l t y O c t o b e r 2 0 1 1 ! 

# C i t y

M P O

C o u n t y
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of 4TH Grade Films,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Quarterly
Report"),  we, James Doolin and Shane  Thueson,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Date: 05/13/08                  /S/ JAMES DOOLIN
                                --------------------------------------------
                                James Doolin, President and Director

Date: 05/13/08                  /S/ SHANE THUESON
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Shane Thueson, Vice President and Director
**Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in this Pre-effective Amendment No. 2 to RegistrationStatement No. 333-144938 on Form S-1 of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. which pursuant to Rule 429is a post-effective amendment to Registration Statement No. 333-140370, of our report dated April28, 2006 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraphregarding the acquisition of ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. on December 1, 2005), relating to thefinancial statements of ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P appearing in the Form 10-K/A of Eagle RockEnergy Partners, L.P. for the year ended December 31, 2006, and to the reference to us under theheading “Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement.
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 22

- 00156

- CV

JENNIFER STEWART, STEVEN

STEWART, DONALD STEWART,

AND KATHY STEWART, D/B/A

ROYAL HORSE FARMS

, Appellant s

v.

SHARON LEE

, Appellee

From the 13th District Court

Navarro County, Texas

Trial Court N o. D 20

- 29111

- CV

MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Order dated August 25, 2022, we directed appellants to pay o r make

arrangements to pay the clerk ’ s fee for prep arat ion of the record within twenty

- one

days . Appellants were notified that failure to do so wou ld result in dismissal of this

appeal for want of prosecution.

Texas Rule of Appellate Pr o c edure 37.3(b) provides that if an appellant fails to

pay or make arra ngements to pay the c lerk ’ s fee for preparation of the record, the CourtStewart v. Lee Page 2 may “ dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to

proceed without payment of costs. The court must give the appellant a reasonable

opportunity to c ure before dismissal. ” T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 37.3(b). To date, the record does

not reflect that appellants have paid or made arrangements to pay for the clerk ’ s r ecord

or that appellants are entitled to pr oceed without payment of costs. Therefore,

pursuan t to Rule 37.3(b), we hereby dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. Id

.

Appellants ’ pro se Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Leave to Refile is

dismissed.

MATT JOHNSON

Justice

Before Chief Ju stice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Just ice Smith

Appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed November 2, 2022

[CV06]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1485

K. THOMAS GLASSON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AMERICAN AUTO CONSULTANTS, INCORPORATED; JAY

PATTERSON; COLETTE BOUFFARD PATTERSON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-1377-A)

Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998

Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ginger McGuffie, MCGUFFIE, HANDAL & WEISE, Vienna, Virginia, for

Appellant. Jay Patterson, Colette Bouffard Patterson, Appellees

Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

K. Thomas Glasson, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint on the grounds that the Defendants are not

subject to personal jurisdiction in Virginia. Our review of the

record and the district court’s opinion adopting the magistrate

judge’s recommendation discloses no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Glasson v. American Auto Consultants, Inc., No. CA-96-1377-A (E.D. Va. Feb. 21,

1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, DC

Served: March 3, 2010

------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- --------------- -------------- APPLICATION OF CSI AVIATION SERVICES, INC.

FOR AN EMERGENCY EXEMPTION

DOCKET DOT-OST-2009-0311

------------------ ------------------ ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- --------------- --------------

NOTICE

On February 12, 2010, the Department requested additional information from the General Services Administration (GSA) regarding the app lication of CSI Aviation Services, Inc. for an exemption to conduct certain broker services for GSA. On March 1, 2010, GSA responded to the Department’s letter.

To ensure a complete record, we are providing an opportunity for interested parties to submit comments to GSA’s submission. Such comments shall be submitted no later than Friday, March 5, 2010. Given the extensive record alrea dy present and the public interest in resolution, we would not be favorably disposed to rece iving additional pleadings beyond that date.

We will serve this notice by electronic mail on al l parties to this proceeding, and hereby authorize service of documents by facsimile and by electronic mail.

This action was effective when taken and the fili ng of a petition for review will not alter such

effectiveness.

By:

PAUL L. GRETCH Director, Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

Dated: March 3, 2010

An electronic version of this notice is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.regulations.gov
August 13, 2015



### JUDGMENT


## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 15

- 00623

- CV V.

CBS OUTDOOR INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION , Appellee

________________________________ Today the Court heard the parties ’ joint motion to set aside the judgment signed by the court below on March 10, 2014 , with respect to Outfront Media
LLC

, formerly CBS Outdoor, Inc . Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the judgment VACATED AND REMAND the cause to the trial court for proceeding s in accordance with this Court’ s opinion. We further order that each party shall pay its costs by reason of this appeal.

We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESUS MATIAS-JESUS, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General, 

Respondent.

No. 15-71633 

Agency No. A200-567-155 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted December 2, 2020**

Before: WALLACE, CLIFTON, and BRESS, Circuit Judges.

Jesus Matias-Jesus, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of 

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of 

removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have 

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review factual findings for substantial 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 7 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

evidence. Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006). We deny 

the petition for review.

Substantial evidence supports the determination that Matias-Jesus failed to 

establish a well-founded fear of persecution. See Gu v. Gonzales, 454 F.3d 1014, 

1022 (9th Cir. 2006) (petitioner failed “to present compelling, objective evidence 

demonstrating a well-founded fear of persecution”); see also Nagoulko v. INS, 333 

F.3d 1012, 1018 (9th Cir. 2003) (possibility of future persecution “too 

speculative”). Thus, Matias-Jesus’s asylum claim fails.

In this case, because Matias-Jesus failed to establish eligibility for asylum, 

he failed to establish eligibility for withholding of removal. See Zehatye, 453 F.3d 

at 1190.

Substantial evidence also supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because 

Matias-Jesus failed to show it is more likely than not he will be tortured by or with 

the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Guatemala. See Aden 

v. Holder, 589 F.3d 1040, 1047 (9th Cir. 2009).

As stated in the court’s August 21, 2015 order, the temporary stay of 

removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate. 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001063450
<NAME>                        GALAXY ENTERPRISES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1
<CURRENCY>                                     U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                       3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                       1.00
<CASH>                                             639,237
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      250,401
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                         26,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 1,602,292
<PP&E>                                             283,671
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (79,904)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   2,669,351
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,023,745
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                            39,947
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,543,483
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     2,669,351
<SALES>                                          3,612,125
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,612,125
<CGS>                                            1,950,094
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,747,925
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     1,976
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (137,776)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (52,355)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (85,421)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                           41,619
<NET-INCOME>                                      (127,040)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (0.023)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                       (0.020)




</TABLE>