alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Enrichment Systems Engineering

### **Enrichment Systems Engineering**

*We design, fabricate, and program engineering solutions to support the advancement of enrichment technologies by intersecting creative, sustainable processes to meet long-term mission goals of reestablishing U.S. uranium enrichment and stable isotope production.*
                        - **Application Engineering**  — We execute the buildout and startup of enrichment testbeds and cascades.
                        - ***Electrical, Instrumentation, and Controls Engineering*** — We perform the design programming, and buildout of all the instrumentation and controls systems associated with our enrichment devices, testbeds, and cascades. *Responsible for human-machine interface research and system logic development. This group develops and implements advanced control system architectures for centrifuge test beds.*
                        - ***Machine Design Engineering*** — We provide enrichment device designs, primarily centrifuge. *This group employs state-of-the-art engineering design and robust systems engineering principles to realize design concepts and detailed prototype manufacturing requirements.*
                        - ***Testbed Design Engineering*** — We provide enrichment testing systems along with mechanical, electrical, and process designs to facilitate machine and cascade integration. *Responsible for gas testing testbed development. This group conceptualizes and designs robust and flexible testbeds for gas testing enrichment devices using state-of-the-art systems engineering principles.*

### Contact

BrettA Blanchard

blanchardba@ornl.gov
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6135 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6135

**Commission Decision of 02/03/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6135 - CARLYLE / ADMINISTRATIEKANTOOR ALPINVEST / ALPINVEST ) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 2.3.2011

SG-Greffe(2011) D/ 3352/ 3353

C(2011) 1556

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6135 - CARLYLE/ ADMINISTRATIEKANTOOR ALPINVEST/ ALPINVEST Notification of 02/02/2011 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 43, 11.02.2011, p.19

1. On 02/02/2011, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the Carlyle Group ("Carlyle", USA) and Stichting Administratiekantoor AlpInvest (“AlpInvest Partners SPV”, the Netherlands), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of AlpInvest Partners N.V. ("AlpInvest Partners", the Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Carlyle : Global alternative asset manager, which sponsors funds that invest globally across three asset classes: private equity, real estate and credit alternatives (e.g., leveraged loans, bonds, distressed debt and mezzanine debt) in a range of industries;

- for AlpInvest Partners SPV : Special purpose acquisition vehicle created for purposes of the investment in AlpInvest;

- for AlpInvest Partners : Fund management, primarily for its current shareholders, including fund investments, co-investments (direct minority shareholdings), secondary fund investments and investments in mezzanine debt.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALWINDER SINGH,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71603

Agency No. A077-384-679

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 21, 2012** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, McKEOWN, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Balwinder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for an abuse of discretion,

Toufighi v. Mukasey, 538 F.3d 988, 992 (9th Cir. 2008), and we deny the petition

FILED

MAR 02 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71603

for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Singh’s motion to reopen as

untimely where the motion was filed over five years after the BIA’s final order, see

8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and Singh failed to present sufficient evidence of changed

circumstances in India to qualify for the regulatory exception to the time limit for

filing motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Malty v. Ashcroft, 381

F.3d 942, 945 (9th Cir. 2004) (“The critical question is . . . whether circumstances

have changed sufficiently that a petitioner who previously did not have a legitimate

claim for asylum now has a well-founded fear of future persecution.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2792

To provide that land which is owned by the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana

but which is not held in trust by the United States for the Tribe

may be leased or transferred by the Tribe without further approval

by the United States.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 27, 2000

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To provide that land which is owned by the Coushatta Tribe

of Louisiana but which is not held in trust by the United

States for the Tribe may be leased or transferred by

the Tribe without further approval by the United States.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND

4 TRANSACTIONS.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi6 sion of law, without further approval, ratification, or au7 thorization by the United States, the Coushatta Tribe of

8 Louisiana, may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise
2

•S 2792 IS

1 transfer all or any part of the Tribe’s interest in any real

2 property that is not held in trust by the United States

3 for the benefit of the Tribe.

4 (b) TRUST LAND NOT AFFECTED.—Nothing in this

5 section is intended or shall be construed to—

6 (1) authorize the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana

7 to lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer

8 all or any part of an interest in any real property

9 that is held in trust by the United States for the

10 benefit of the Tribe; or

11 (2) affect the operation of any law governing

12 leasing, selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise

13 transferring any interest in such trust land.

Æ
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 10-402 Date: July 29, 2010 

Subject: 2010 Federal Benefits Open Season: Rider Information

This is the second in our series of 2010 Open Season Benefits Administration Letters (BAL). 

This BAL provides information on how to order the Guide to Federal Benefits. 

The Guide to Federal Benefits is the only Federal Benefits Open Season publication agencies 

must pay for and the only one agencies must order through the Government Printing Office 

(GPO) Rider. The other materials for the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS), the Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP), and the 

Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program are free of charge to agencies. 

Attached is the August 2010 Federal Benefits Open Season Rider. Your agency also should 

receive the rider through regular printing officer channels. Please note agencies may order the 

publications on the attached list by riding the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's requisition. 

Field and regional offices must submit their requirements to their department or agency’s 

Washington, DC, area headquarters printing office before the September 10, 2010, cutoff date. 

The headquarters office must submit the consolidated requisitions to the GPO by COB 

September 10, 2010. In order to provide products to our customers on a timely basis, we will not 

extend this cutoff date. Guides will be shipped to agency distribution points beginning October 

19, 2010. 

If you are the headquarters agency Benefits Officer and you do not know which customer service 

team at GPO is assigned to your agency, please call GPO on (202) 512-1239 or use the following 

link for information: http://www.gpo.gov/customers/nams.htm. 

Note: Field and regional offices with questions regarding submitting requisitions to their agency 

printing officer should contact their agency headquarters Benefits Officer. Please follow the link 

for a directory of headquarters level agency benefits officers: http://apps.opm.gov/abo/.

When ordering the Guide to Federal Benefits please consider this useful resource for new 

employees. The Guide includes important information about an employee’s overall benefit 

package. Therefore, order an amount sufficient for your new employees, benefit fairs, and 

ongoing employee needs. 
2

Remember, the 2010 Federal Benefits Open Season for the 2011 plan year runs from Monday, 

November 8 through Monday, December 13, 2010. 

Sincerely, 

 William B. Zielinski 

Associate Director 

Retirement & Benefits
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-7601

RODERICK DEMEATRICE OAKS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD CLARK, Director,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District 

Judge. (2:13-cv-00674-RAJ-TEM)

Submitted: January 15, 2015 Decided: January 21, 2015

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick Demeatrice Oaks, Appellant Pro Se. Leah A. Darron, 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, 

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Roderick Demeatrice Oaks seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and 

dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition as time-barred. 

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the 

notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of 

the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends 

the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), or reopens the 

appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely 

filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional 

requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007).

The district court’s order was entered on the docket 

on September 4, 2014. The notice of appeal was filed on October 

28, 2014.∗

 Because Oaks failed to file a timely notice of appeal 

or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we 

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

 ∗ Because Oaks incorrectly mailed the notice of appeal to a 

state court, which is under no obligation to forward the notice 

to the proper district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1631 (2012), Oaks 

does not benefit from the prison mailbox rule.
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1
 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encore Energy Partners LP;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986](c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: August 8, 2008
    /s/ Jon S. BrumleyJon S. BrumleyChief Executive Officer and President of Encore Energy
Partners GP LLC, the General Partner of Encore Energy
Partners LP
Exhibit 10.2


 





AMENDMENT
No. 1


 


 


This Amendment No.1
is made and entered into this 30th day of June, 2014 (“Effective Date”) by and between Net Element, Inc.
(the “Company”), Oleg Firer, Steven Wolberg, Georgia Notes 18, LLC and Vladimir Sadovskiy.


 


Reference is made to
the Letter Agreement dated August 28, 2013 entered into between the Company, Oleg Firer, Steven Wolberg, Georgia Notes 18, LLC
and Vladimir Sadovskiy (the “Exchange Agreement”).


 


This Amendment No.1
amends the Exchange Agreement. Capitalized terms not defined in this Amendment No. 1 shall have the same meaning ascribed to them
in the Exchange Agreement.


 


Whereas:


 


Prior to the date of this Amendment No. 1, the parties intended
that the number of shares of common stock of the Company (the “Shares”) to be issued would be calculated to reflect
Shares that constituted a 10% ownership interest in the Company on a pre-share issuance basis;


 


The parties have agreed to revise the basis of the Share issuance
calculation and wish to record their agreement in writing;


 


Now therefore, the Parties agree as follows:


 


1. As and with effect from the Effective Date, the parties agree
that the number of Shares to be issued pursuant to the Exchange Agreement shall be calculated to reflect Shares that constitute
a 10% ownership interest in the Company on the post-share issuance basis.


 


2. Except as amended hereby, all other terms and provisions
of the Exchange Agreement remain in full and effect.


 


3. This Amendment No. 1 may be executed simultaneously in any
number of counterparts. Each counterpart shall be deemed to be an original, and all such counterparts shall constitute one and
the same instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart of a signature page of this letter agreement in Portable Document Format
(PDF) or by facsimile transmission shall be as effective as delivery of a manually executed original counterpart of this Amendment
No. 1.


 


 


[Signatures are on next page.]


 




    	 



    	 



    

 


Agreed to by the parties this June 30, 2014.


 


	 	NET ELEMENT, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	By:	   	 
	 	Name:	Jonathan New
	 	Title:	Chief Financial Officer


 


 


 


 


________________________________________


Oleg
Firer


 


 


 


________________________________________


Steven
Wolberg


 


 


 


________________________________________


Vladimir
SadovskIy


 


 


 


Georgia Notes
18, LLC


 


 


	By:	 	 
	Name:	Anzheliqua Zalkin
	Title:	Managing Member
# Application Engineering Group

*Delivering advanced scientific applications with best-in-class methods, design, and implementation.*

The mission of this group is to empower the pursuit of world class science using the principles of software excellence. By leading the engineering of high-quality scientific software, the group enables scientists to fully exploit the capabilities of future generations of high-performance computing systems to solve some of the most intractable scientific problems. The group focuses on the research, development, and implementation of software based on principles and practices that ensure the performance, quality, reliability, and usability of software is paramount and that the software that underpins science is trustworthy and reproducible.

 

### Contact

GregoryR Watson

watsongr@ornl.gov

## Current Research

## Publication

  Illustrated formalisms for total scattering data: a guide for new practitioners...

## Publication

  Measurement of jet-medium interactions via direct photon-hadron correlations in Au+Au and d+Au collisions at √sNN=200 GeV...

## Publication

  Requirements, Status, and Plans for Track Reconstruction at the sPHENIX Experiment...

## Publication

  Lightweight Software Process Improvement Using Productivity and Sustainability Improvement Planning (PSIP)...
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2012-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2013 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2013.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 27th day of March, 2014.

 

----

 

March 27, 2014

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman |
|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|   | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman     |
|   | Title: | President               |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Designation of performance review board chair.

# SUMMARY:

This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair designee for the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all previously published lists of Performance Review Board Chair.

# DATES:

This appointment is effective as of October 3, 2024.

Dennis M. Miotla (Primary)

Terri E. Lee (Alternate)

## Signing Authority

                    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on October 3, 2024, by Farhana Hossain, Director of the Office of Corporate Executive Management within the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication as an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

Signed in Washington, DC, on October 3, 2024.

Jennifer Hartzell,

Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.

[FR Doc. 2024-23268 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P