alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Nicholas Galeone, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered bythis report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for theperiod covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and exceptas disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this reportin accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee on and after October 17, 2022,U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association,as Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, Trimont Real EstateAdvisors, LLC (f/k/a TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), and as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant.

 

Dated:March 20, 2023

 

/s/Nicholas Galeone

 

President 

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 25, 2019

p0918

Order 

Clerk

September 25, 2019

159574

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 159574

COA: 340614

Kalamazoo CC: 

COLLIN JAMES STRICKLIN, 2016-000496-AR

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 18, 2019 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Exhibit CFM-303 of Corporate Flight Management, Inc. to its application. Exhibit CFM-303 of Corporate Flight Management, Inc. to its application.
★

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2998

AN ACT

To designate a fellowship program of the Peace Corps promoting the work of returning Peace Corps volunteers

in underserved American communities as the ‘‘Paul D.

Coverdell Fellows Program’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Paul D. Coverdell Fel5 lows Program Act of 2000’’.
2

S 2998 ES1S

1 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

2 Congress makes the following findings:

3 (1) Paul D. Coverdell was elected to the George

4 State Senate in 1970 and later became Minority

5 Leader of the Georgia State Senate, a post he held

6 for 15 years.

7 (2) Paul D. Coverdell served with distinction as

8 the 11th Director of the Peace Corps from 1989 to

9 1991, where he promoted a fellowship program that

10 was composed of returning Peace Corps volunteers

11 who agreed to work in underserved American com12 munities while they pursued educational degrees.

13 (3) Paul D. Coverdell served in the United

14 States Senate from the State of Georgia from 1993

15 until his sudden death on July 18, 2000.

16 (4) Senator Paul D. Coverdell was beloved by

17 his colleagues for his civility, bipartisan efforts, and

18 his dedication to public service.

19 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF PAUL D. COVERDELL FELLOWS

20 PROGRAM.

21 (a) IN GENERAL.—Effective on the date of enact22 ment of this Act, the program under section 18 of the

23 Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 2517) referred to before such

24 date as the ‘‘Peace Corps Fellows/USA Program’’ is redes25 ignated as the ‘‘Paul D. Coverdell Fellows Program’’.
3

S 2998 ES1S

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference before the date of

2 enactment of this Act in any law, regulation, order, docu3 ment, record, or other paper of the United States to the

4 Peace Corps Fellows/USA Program shall, on and after

5 such date, be considered to refer to the Paul D. Coverdell

6 Fellows Program.

Passed the Senate July 27, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2998

AN ACT

To designate a fellowship program of the Peace

Corps promoting the work of returning PeaceCorps volunteers in underserved American communities as the ‘‘Paul D. Coverdell Fellows Program’’.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 46337

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

ANAND JAMES STANLEY WARNER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: May 3, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, State of Idaho, Ada

County. Hon. Nancy Baskin, District Judge. 

Order relinquishing jurisdiction and sentence, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally Cooley, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before HUSKEY, Judge; LORELLO, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Anand James Stanley Warner pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance,

Idaho Code § 37-2732(c). The district court imposed a unified five-year sentence, with two 

years determinate, suspended the sentence, and placed Warner on a term of probation. After a 

probation violation, the district court retained jurisdiction, and Warner was sent to participate in 

the rider program. After Warner completed his rider, the district court relinquished jurisdiction

and reduced Warner’s sentence to a unified four and one-half year sentence, with one and onehalf years determinate. Warner appeals, claiming that the district court erred by relinquishing 

jurisdiction and by failing to further reduce Warner’s sentence.
2

We note that the decision to place a defendant on probation or whether, instead, to 

relinquish jurisdiction over the defendant is a matter within the sound discretion of the district 

court and will not be overturned on appeal absent an abuse of that discretion. State v. Hood, 102 

Idaho 711, 712, 639 P.2d 9, 10 (1981); State v. Lee, 117 Idaho 203, 205-06, 786 P.2d 594, 596-

97 (Ct. App. 1990). The record in this case shows that the district court properly considered the 

information before it and determined that probation was not appropriate. We hold that Warner

has failed to show that the district court abused its discretion in relinquishing jurisdiction.

Applying the foregoing standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot 

say that the district court abused its discretion either in relinquishing jurisdiction or in failing to 

further reduce Warner’s sentence without modification. Therefore, the order of the district court 

relinquishing jurisdiction and Warner’s sentence are affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of United Insurance Holdings Corp. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joseph R. Peiso, the Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer) of United Insurance Holdings Corp. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1)
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of United Insurance Holdings Corp.








By:/s/ Joseph R. PeisoJoseph R. PeisoChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)August 9, 2010
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JOSEPH FORD AND SHEVELLE

FORD

VERSUS

KENDALL PLAIN

NO. 2021 CW 1380

JANUARY 27, 2022

In Re: Kendall Plain, applying for supervisory writs, 19th

Judicial District Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, 

No. 656152. 

BEFORE: GUIDRY, HOLDRIDGE, AND CHUTZ, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

JMG

WRC

Holdridge, J., concurs. Under La. Code Civ. P. art. 561, an

ex parte motion to dismiss based on abandonment must be

accompanied by an affidavit which provides that no step has

timely been taken in the prosecution or defense of the action. 

The writ application does not contain an affidavit in support of

relator' s motion for dismissal. Therefore, the motion seeking

dismissal on the basis of abandonment was properly denied. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY C ERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
# L_2021074DE.01004701.xml

| 4.3.2021 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 74/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2021

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 74/47

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1178/2011 der Kommission vom 3. November 2011 zur Festlegung technischer Vorschriften und von Verwaltungsverfahren in Bezug auf das fliegende Personal in der Zivilluftfahrt gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 311 vom 25. November 2011
  )

Seite 12, Anhang I Teil-FCL Abschnitt A Punkt FCL.035 Buchstabe b Nummer 3:

Anstatt:

| „(3) | Inhabern einer IR oder Bewerbern, die die Prüfung der theoretischen Kenntnisse für eine Luftfahrzeugkategorie bestanden haben, wird dies vollständig auf die Anforderungen für die theoretische Ausbildung und Prüfung für eine IR in einer anderen Luftfahrzeugkategorie angerechnet.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(3)

Inhabern einer IR oder Bewerbern, die die Prüfung der theoretischen Kenntnisse für eine Luftfahrzeugkategorie bestanden haben, wird dies vollständig auf die Anforderungen für die theoretische Ausbildung und Prüfung für eine IR in einer anderen Luftfahrzeugkategorie angerechnet.“

muss es heißen:

| „(3) | Inhabern einer IR oder Bewerbern, die die Prüfung der theoretischen Kenntnisse für den Instrumentenflug für eine Luftfahrzeugkategorie bestanden haben, wird dies vollständig auf die Anforderungen für die theoretische Ausbildung und Prüfung für eine IR in einer anderen Luftfahrzeugkategorie angerechnet.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(3)

Inhabern einer IR oder Bewerbern, die die Prüfung der theoretischen Kenntnisse für den Instrumentenflug für eine Luftfahrzeugkategorie bestanden haben, wird dies vollständig auf die Anforderungen für die theoretische Ausbildung und Prüfung für eine IR in einer anderen Luftfahrzeugkategorie angerechnet.“

Seite 83, Anhang I Teil-FCL Anlage 3 Abschnitt H Nummer 1 Buchstabe b:

Anstatt:

| „b) | falls der Bewerber Inhaber einer CPL(A) ist: 300 Stunden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

falls der Bewerber Inhaber einer CPL(A) ist: 300 Stunden.“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | falls der Bewerber Inhaber einer CPL(H) ist: 300 Stunden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

falls der Bewerber Inhaber einer CPL(H) ist: 300 Stunden.“

---
Filed 4/22/15 P. v. Hawkins CA2/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.
ROSE MENA HAWKINS,
Defendant and Appellant. B256144
(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA185661)

THE COURT: *
Defendant and appellant Rose Mena Hawkins (defendant) appeals from a postjudgment order denying her petition to seal and destroy her arrest record pursuant to Penal Code section 851.8. Her appoint ed counsel filed a brief pursuant to People v.
Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ), raising no issues. On January 29, 2015, we
notified defendant of her counsel ’s brief and gave her leave to file, within 30 days, her own brief or letter stating any grounds or argu ment she might wish to have considered. That time has elapsed, and defendant has subm itted no brief or letter. We have reviewed the entire record, and finding no ar guable issues, affirm the order.

* BOREN, P.J., CHAVEZ , J., HOFFSTADT, J.2 In 1999, defendant was charged with posse ssion of cocaine in violation of Health & Safety Code section 11350, subdivisio n (a), and possession of an opium pipe in violation of Health & Safety Code section 11364. Defendant was convicted of count 1 under a plea agreement and count 2 was dismissed. On May 10, 1999, the trial court placed defendant on formal pr obation for a period of four ye ars under specified terms and conditions. In 2007, the tria l court granted defe ndant’s petition to set aside her guilty plea and dismissed the complaint, pursu ant to Penal Code section 1203.4. Subsequently, defendant filed a petition to se al and destroy her arrest record. On April 21, 2014, the trial court denied the pe tition after finding that defendant’s guilty plea precluded a finding of factual innocence, a pr erequisite to relief under Penal Code section 851.8. Defendant filed a timely notice of appeal from the order.
We have conducted a de novo review to determine whether defendant carried her burden to demonstrate factual innocence (see People v. Adair (2003) 29 Cal.4th 895, 897), and we conclude that the trial cour t’s findings were corr ect. Further, we are
satisfied from our examination of the entire r ecord that defendant’s appellate counsel has fully complied with her respons ibilities and that no arguable issue exists. We conclude that defendant has, by virtue of counsel’s compliance with the Wende procedure and our review of the record, received adequate and e ffective appellate review of the trial court’s order denying her petition. (See Smith v. Robbins (2000) 528 U. S. 259, 278; People v. Kelly (2006) 40 Cal.4th 106, 123-124.) The trial court’s order, entered April 21, 2014, is affirmed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS.
United States 

 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 19-201 Date: May 9, 2019 

Subject: Implementing Daily Submission of FEHB Electronic Enrollment Transactions

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is enhancing the FEHB Data-Hub’s capabilities to 

provide more frequent Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program enrollment transaction 

feeds to FEHB Carriers. 

As of August 1, 2019, FEHB Carriers will begin accepting FEHB electronic SF 2809 and SF 2810 

enrollment transaction files each business day, in contrast to the current schedule of weekly 

transmissions. 

Accelerating FEHB transactions to daily will reduce the need for agency personnel to send duplicate 

SF 2809s and SF 2810s to Carriers. Thus, the efficiency and timeliness of data exchange between 

agencies and Carriers will be significantly enhanced while reducing the burden on agencies to 

perform manual transactions. This change will also improve the customer experience for enrollees by 

providing more timely confirmation of FEHB enrollment or changes to enrollment. 

However, in order to fully realize these improvements, we need all agencies that use the FEHB DataHub to begin sending FEHB electronic transactions on a daily basis. We expect all agencies to begin 

daily submission of electronic enrollment transactions beginning as soon as possible after August 1, 

2019, and under no circumstances later than August 1, 2020. If your agency does not currently use 

the FEHB Data-Hub, we strongly urge you to utilize this system for all FEHB transactions. 

Thank you for your cooperation in making the FEHB Program more efficient. If you have questions, 

please contact Mr. Merle Townley at merle.townley@opm.gov. 

 Sincerely,

 Laurie E. Bodenheimer 

Acting Director

Healthcare and Insurance
RegulatoryEvaluationDocketNo.FAA-;(ot-5-5'537'DirectorateIdentifier:Ifyoumakechangestothevaluesinthetablebelow,youmustensurethetotalsupdateaccordingly.Iftheydonot,click(orTab)intoandthenoutofthechangedcell.EstimatedCosts:ActionCostsperProduct(e.g.,aircraft,engine,(e.g.,Inspection,•Propeller,appliance)Work-hoursLaborPartsCostTotalCostsNumberofTotalCostreplacement)(includecost(labor+u.s.forU.S.FleetDonotincludeonconditioncostshereaccess,testing,(@$85/hparts)Registeredandclose-no)our)ProductsRemovalandreplacementofHP/LPpwnpand2.0$13,40012meteringvalveassemblyTheknownnumberofproductsincompliance:TotalCostsofcomplianceforU.S.fleet:$162,840Costscoveredunderwan·antv([[known)$On-ConditionCosts:ActionWork-hoursLaborcostPartsCostCostperProduct(e.g.,Inspection,(includeaccess,(@$85/hour)replacement)testing,andclose-un)Special considerations

for Economic Analysis

(Use this field

to explain anything

in the Estimated

Costs table that was assumed

or might

not

be obvious.

This field
can also

be used

to explain warranty costs): Executive
Order 12866: Could

the AD

be considered

a "significant regulatmy action"?

•

YES'

D NO

IZI *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies

and Procedures: Is the AD significant?

**~**

YES'

D NO
IZI *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility

Act: Will
the AD have

a significant economic impact

on

a substantial number

of small entities? Explain

for either

a Yes

or No answer. **~**

YES

D NO

IZI Explanation: Intrastate Aviation

in Alaska: This AD could affect intrastate aviation

in Alaska.

Is

it appropriate

to include specific requirements

for aircraft operated

in Alaska where aviation might

be the only mode oftranspo11ation?

-· YES'

D NO

IZI *Explanation:
Six Months EndedJune 30,
    
    
    Year Ended(In thousands, except ratio)
    
    2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003Income from continuing
operations before income
taxes, equity in earnings of
non-consolidated affiliates
and cumulative effect of a
change in accounting
principle
    
    $
    538,369
    
    
    $
    524,579
    
    
    $
    1,198,646
    
    
    $
    1,071,437
    
    
    $
    961,860
    
    
    $
    1,200,551
    
    
    $
    1,725,685Dividends and other received
from nonconsolidated
affiliates
    
    
    16,381
    
    
    
    7,706
    
    
    
    6,793
    
    
    
    15,179
    
    
    
    14,696
    
    
    
    13,491
    
    
    
    2,096Total
    
    
    554,750
    
    
    
    532,285
    
    
    
    1,205,439
    
    
    
    1,086,616
    
    
    
    976,556
    
    
    
    1,214,042
    
    
    
    1,727,781Fixed ChargesInterest expense*
    
    
    182,178
    
    
    
    234,499
    
    
    
    451,870
    
    
    
    484,063
    
    
    
    443,442
    
    
    
    367,511
    
    
    
    392,215Interest portion of rentals
    
    
    227,006
    
    
    
    194,030
    
    
    
    418,587
    
    
    
    374,875
    
    
    
    342,462
    
    
    
    321,342
    
    
    
    282,575Total fixed charges
    
    
    409,184
    
    
    
    428,529
    
    
    
    870,457
    
    
    
    858,938
    
    
    
    785,904
    
    
    
    688,853
    
    
    
    674,790Preferred stock dividendsTax effect of preferred
dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    After tax preferred
dividends
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Total fixed charges and
preferred dividends
    
    
    409,184
    
    
    
    428,529
    
    
    
    870,457
    
    
    
    858,938
    
    
    
    785,904
    
    
    
    688,853
    
    
    
    674,790Total earnings available for
payment of fixed charges
    
    $
    963,934
    
    
    $
    960,814
    
    
    $
    2,075,896
    
    
    $
    1,945,554
    
    
    $
    1,762,460
    
    
    $
    1,902,895
    
    
    $
    2,402,571Ratio of earnings to fixed
charges
    
    
    2.36
    
    
    
    2.24
    
    
    
    2.38
    
    
    
    2.27
    
    
    
    2.24
    
    
    
    2.76
    
    
    
    3.56Rental fees and charges
    
    
    648,589
    
    
    
    554,370
    
    
    
    1,195,962
    
    
    
    1,071,072
    
    
    
    978,463
    
    
    
    918,120
    
    
    
    807,356Interest portion
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    35
    %
    
    
    35
    %
 
 *
    
    The interest amount does not include interest expense associated with unrecognized tax benefits.