alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1)   | the                quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vortec Electronics, Inc. for the                quarter ended October 31, 2007 fully complies with the requirements                of                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for                the                quarter ended October 31, 2007, fairly presents in all material respects,                the financial condition and results of operations of Vortec Electronics,                Inc.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/                Melissa Lopez                                                                   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                               |
| Name:  | Melissa                Lopez                                                                       |
|   |                                                                                               |
| Title: | Principal                Executive Officer,Principal                Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                                               |
| Date:  | December                11, 2007                                                                   |
IN THE BAR OF MONTANA 

Christopher J. Davis has petitioned for reinstaternent to active status in the State Bar 

of Montana. Davis voluntarily chose inactive status on April 1, 2003. Davis was active in 

California during the intervening time period, but that ended in 2015. It is the Court's 

practice in such cases, given the amount of time since Davis has been on active status, to 

require a character and fitness review and the cornpletion of continuing education. 

Therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner shall submit to an investigation 

conducted by the Comrnission on Character and Fitness, which, in its discretion, may be a 

lirnited investigation. Petitioner shall comply with the character and fitness process and 

timely produce information and documentation as requested by the Commission. The 

Commission will investigate Petitioner's character and fitness in accordance with the Rules 

of Procedure of the Cornmission on Character and Fitness. The Commission will advise 

the Court whether the Petitioner has been certified, conditionally certified, or denied 

certification. If the Commission denies certification, the Commission will issue written 

findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a decision pursuant to Section 5(c)(6) of the Rules 

of Procedure of the Commission on Character and Fitness. If the Petitioner is certified or 

conditionally certified by the Commission on Character and Fitness, the Petitioner shall be 

admitted to the active practice of law in Montana upon payment of appropriate dues and 

fees and penalties to the State Bar of Montana. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, if admitted, within six months of admission to 

the active practice of law, Petitioner shall submit to the Board of Continuing Legal 

Education, P.O. Box 577, Helena, MT 59624, proof of attendance at thirty hours of 
DATED this Z3 —day of August, 2022. 

Chief Justice 

LA wde 

& 4 'J L 

Justices 

2
September 21, 2009

Subject: Teleconference with Portland Cement Association to Discuss THC Emissions 

Data Gathering

Location: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC

Date: September 21, 2009

Participants:

Portland Cement Association (PCA)

Andy O’Hare, PCA

Hector Ybanez, Holcim

Curtis Leslie, Ash Grove

Mike Pelan, Lafarge

Tom Rader, Buzzi

Tim Matz, Lehigh

Jay Grady, Cal Portland Cement

Nancy Garnett, TXI

John Holmes (consultant to PCA)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Keith Barnett

Peter Tsirigotis

The purpose of this call was to continue discussion between the EPA and the PCA on the THC 

data gathering effort test plan dated September 15, 2009. The THC test plan design dated 

September 15, 2009, has been docketed separately.
Additional Interagency Comments on RIN 2060-AP52 

 Higgins, Cortney 

 to: RobertJ Wayland 

 03/09/2011 01:44 PM 

 Cc: Thomas Gillis, Karen Thundiyil, Bill Maxwell, Tom Walton 

1 Attachment 

Summary of Interagency Working Comments on draft EGU MACT under EO 12866 

Interagency Review_ 03 09 2011.doc 

Hi Bob,

Attached you will find additional interagency comments on RIN 2060‐AP52.  Additionally, the

comments on Chapter 9 of the RIA, as well as some of the TSDs, are forthcoming.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Cortney

________________________________________________

Cortney Higgins 

Policy Analyst 

OMB/OIRA/NRE 

202.395.7856 

chiggins@omb.eop.gov
Order entered March 2 6 , 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00330
- CV EDGAR TUNCHEZ, Appellant

V. BRADLY HOUK, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 19
- 02501
- A

ORDER Before this Court is the March 25, 2020 letter from counsel for appellant that we construe as a motion for extension of time to file the clerk’s record. We GRANT the motion. The cler k’s record shall be filed by April 8, 2020

. We DIRECT the Clerk of this Court to send a copy of this order to Dallas County Clerk John Warren and all parties.
/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL JUSTICE
Motion to Dismiss Granted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismissed; and 

Memorandum Opinion filed December 6, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-22-00737-CV

IN RE PREFERRED CONTRACTORS AND DAULTON SPENCE, Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

WRIT OF MANDAMUS

56th District Court

Galveston County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 22-CV-0269

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On October 17, 2022, relators Preferred Contractors and Daulton Spence filed 

a petition for writ of mandamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221; 

see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relators ask this Court to compel the 

Honorable Lonnie Cox, presiding judge of the 56th District Court of Galveston

County, to vacate an order denying relators’ motions to sever claims and transfer 

venue and to issue an order severing claims against them and transferring those 

claims to Chambers County.
2

On November 16, 2022, relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the

petition. We hereby grant the motion and dismiss relators’ petition.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Christopher and Justices Wise and Hassan.
OFFICE At>OJu:ss 

12 5 Access Road 

\or\\'ood. ivlt\ 02062 

February 22.2013 

Norwood Memorial Airport 

Russ Maguire. A.AL. ACE. Airport Manager 

Boston Executive Helicopters 

Attn: Chris Donovan. President 

125 Access Road 

Norwood. MA 02062 

RE: Approval of Assignment, Assumption and Amendment of Lease 

Dear Chris: 

i\IAJLJ:\(; AnOJu:s!-1 

125 Acccss Road 

~urwood. MA 0206~ 

On behalf of the Norwood Airport Commission ( AC): Following a review by FAA and the 

Massachusetts Department of Transportation. of Bnston Executive Helicopters· assignment, 

assumption and amendment of lease, this document was approved by the NAC at its public 

meeting on February 13.2013. 

Sincerely, 

-- ~ /)v)e--< . 

Russ Maguire. Manage~ Norwood Memorial Airport 

CC: Norwood Airport Commission. 1Vorwood Toll'n Counsel 

Phone: { 7X I ) 255-561 6 1 Fax: (781 ) 255-5617 1 nnngui re(lt norwoodma.gov
Harkins Builders Inc. owns a DJI Phantom 2 Vision +. We would like to use this UAS to take aerial 

pictures and video of our job sites. We have approximately 20 sites in the 

Maryland/Virginia/DC/Pennsylvania area. We would comply with airport and DC restrictions. We would 

also make sure to get permission from the Owners of our projects before flying. 

Specifications of the UAS:

1. Weight (including battery and propellers) 2.74 lbs.

2. Max Ascent: 6 meters/second

3. Max Descent: 3 meters/second

4. Max flight speed: 15 meters/second

5. Built-in camera

6. Operating Frequency: 5.728 GHz – 5.85 GHz

7. Additional data can be found at this site:

http://www.dji.com/product/phantom-2-vision-plus/spec

Operating procedure:

1. Before powering on any of the equipment, we check the batteries to make sure they are fully 

charged. 

2. Turn on the Remote Controller

3. Place the Phantom on a flat surface on the ground and power on.

4. Connect to the Phantom Wifi on my iPhone 6.

5. Go to the DJI app on my iPhone 6 and tap the camera so I can see (on the phone) what the 

Phantom camera sees.

6. Connect my iPhone 6 to the clasp of the Remote Controller.

7. The app shows important data such as: battery life, distance, altitude, and number of connected 

GPS satellites. I can also control camera tilt, pictures, and video from the app.

8. The app also shows the “ready” status of the Phantom. The Phantom has four arms for the 

propellers. Under the arms are two red lights and two green lights. The red lights always stay 

red. The green lights indicate readiness. If they are not green, calibration needs to occur.

9. I only take off when the lights are green and the app shows that there are a minimum of 6 

connected GPS satellites and that it is ready.

10. To start the propellers, I pull both control sticks down and towards each other. Then I let go of 

the sticks and make sure that the lights are green.

11. I make sure that there are no trees, poles, or other obstructions nearby before takeoff.

12. The Phantom has the ability to hover in the same position if you do not touch either control 

stick. This is used for landing. I guide the Phantom slowly towards me and let it hover so I can 

grab the legs and power down the propellers.

I have over 50 hours’ experience flying the Phantom. I am comfortable with the controls and confident 

in my ability to safely fly the Phantom on our job sites. We specialize in building multi-family structures 

that are typically 4 or 5 stories high. I always maintain a line of site with the Phantom while I am flying it. 

Our owners have expressed the desire for aerial photography to help chart the progress of the projects.
Please grant us the exemption to fly this UAS on our job sites. Feel free to contact me via email if you 

have any further questions.

Brian Lombardo

blombardo@harkinsbuilders.com
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Plastron Acquisition Corp. II (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Rapp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael RappMichael
      Rapp
              Principal
      Executive Officer
              November 15,
      2010
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 60632 Summary Calendar

XIU HUA REN , Petitioner

v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL , Respondent

Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A095 455 446

Before KING, SOUTHWICK, and ENGELHARDT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *
Xiu Hua Ren, a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China, was removed from the United States in 2003, returned in 2008 , and o btained withholding of removal. After she married and obtained derivative asylee

status through her husband , s he filed a m otion to reopen her removal proceedings on that basis. An Immigration Judge (IJ) denied her motion as untimely , and the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed her appeal.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED October 25, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 17-60632 Document: 00514697684 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2018N o. 17

- 60632

2 Ren now petitions for review of the BIA’s decision. “In reviewing the denial of a motion to reopen, this court applies a highly deferential abuse

- of

- discretion standard, regardless of the basis of the alien’s request for relief.” Gonzalez

Cantu v. Sessions , 866 F.3d 302, 304 (5th Cir. 2017) (internal quotation marks
and citation omitted), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 677 (2018)

. First, Ren’s arguments regarding purported errors in the IJ’s decision are misplaced because, under these circumstances, we review only the BIA’s
decision. See Marques v. Lynch , 834 F.3d 549, 552

- 53 (5th Cir . 2016). Second, by failing to cite any authority in support or to explain her argument that the purpose of her motion to reopen made time limitations inapplicable , Ren has forfeited that argument

. See Penalva v. Sessions , 884 F.3d 521, 526 n.3 (5 th Cir. 2018). Third, this court lacks jurisdiction to review Ren’s argument that
the BIA erred when it declined to exercise its discretion to sua sponte reopen her removal proceedings

. See Gonzalez

- Cantu , 866 F.3d at 306. Accordingly, the petition for review is DENIED IN PART and DISMISSED IN PART for lack of jurisdiction. Case: 17-60632 Document: 00514697684 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2018
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Toni A. Eldred, President and Chief Executive Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 4, 2008 /s/ Toni A. EldredToni A. Eldred
Principal Executive Officer
|   | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. for the period ended August 31, 2014 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: October 23, 2014 |   |                                            |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   |                                            |
|                        |   |                                            |
|                        |   | /s/ Mark Pellicane                              |   |   |
|                        |   | Mark Pellicane                                  |
|                        |   | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|                        |   | (Principal Executive Officer)                   |
|                        |   | Falconridge Oil Technologies Corp.              |

----
Exhibit 32.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of LaPorte Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|            |  |                                      
|----------- |  | -------------------------------------
|May 6, 2010 |  | /s/ Lee A. Brady                     
|Date        |  | Lee A. Brady                         
|            |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|            |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                
|            | 
|May 6, 2010 |  | /s/ Michele M. Thompson              
|Date        |  | Michele M. Thompson                  
|            |  | Executive Vice President and         
|            |  | Chief Financial Officer              
|            |  | LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                

This certification accompanies each
report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.



39
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Sandgate Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2012 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 11, 2013
EX-10.41



 Exhibit 10.41 

UNIVAR USA INC. 

SUPPLEMENTAL VALUED INVESTMENT PLAN 

(As Amended and Restated as of July 1, 2010) 

Fourth Amendment 

WHEREAS, Univar USA Inc. (“Company”) sponsors and maintains the Univar USA Inc. Supplemental Valued Investment Plan as amended and
restated as of July 1, 2010 and as thereafter amended (the “Plan”); and 
 WHEREAS, the President has the authority to amend
the Plan for changes that do not significantly increase the cost of the Plan pursuant to Section 12.1 of the Plan; and 
 WHEREAS, the
Company desires to amend the Plan to permit enrollment for the 2012 Plan Year by certain former employees of Basic Chemical Solutions, L.L.C. (“BCS”) who became employees of the Company on July 1, 2011. 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective September 22, 2011, Section 4.1 of the Plan, Employee Eligibility, is hereby amended by
adding a new paragraph to the end thereof to read as follows: 
 “Notwithstanding anything in this Plan to the contrary, an individual
who (i) on June 30, 2011 was an employee of Basic Chemical Solutions, L.L.C., and (ii) on September 23, 2011 is an Employee who meets all of the above requirements to become a Participant in the Plan (except that such individual
was not an Employee who met such requirements in April 2011 when eligibility was determined for the 2012 Plan Year) (“Eligible Former BCS Employee”) shall be eligible to enroll in the Plan during November 2011 to make Participant Deferrals
and receive Matching Employer Contributions for the 2012 Plan Year. For purposes of calculating the amount of any Participant Deferrals and Matching Employer Contributions for an Eligible Former BCS Employee for the 2012 Plan Year,
“Compensation” shall not include any bonus or incentive compensation payments received in 2012. An Eligible Former BCS Employee shall also be eligible to receive Retirement Contributions for the 2012 Plan Year under Section 6.2 to the
extent applicable. 
 This Fourth Amendment to the Plan is adopted and executed this
7th day of September, 2011. 
  

			
	UNIVAR USA INC.
		
	By:	 	




		 	  

		
	Its:	 	President