alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2865

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

SEPTEMBER 22, 2000

Referred to the Committee on Resources, and in addition to the Committee

on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

AN ACT

To designate certain land of the National Forest System

located in the State of Virginia as wilderness.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Virginia Wilderness

5 Act of 2000’’.
2

S 2865 RFH

1 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS.

2 Section 1 of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to designate

3 certain National Forest System lands in the States of Vir4 ginia and West Virginia as wilderness areas’’ (Public Law

5 100–326; 102 Stat. 584) is amended—

6 (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ‘‘and’’ at the

7 end;

8 (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and

9 inserting a semicolon; and

10 (3) by adding at the end the following:

11 ‘‘(7) certain land in the George Washington

12 National Forest, comprising approximately 6,500

13 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘The

14 Priest Wilderness Study Area’, dated June 6, 2000,

15 to be known as the ‘Priest Wilderness Area’; and

16 ‘‘(8) certain land in the George Washington

17 National Forest, comprising approximately 4,800

18 acres, as generally depicted on a map entitled ‘The

19 Three Ridges Wilderness Study Area’, dated June 6,

20 2000, to be known as the ‘Three Ridges Wilderness

21 Area.’’.

Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
# L_2012226EN.01000801.xml

| 22.8.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 226/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 226/8

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1006/2011 of 27 September 2011 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 282 of 28 October 2011
  )

On page 374, CN code 5601 2, column 2:

for:

‘Wadding; other articles of wadding’,

read:

‘Wadding of textile materials and articles thereof’;

on page 843, column 1:

for:

‘
  2932 29 90
  ’,

read:

‘
  2932 20 90
  ’;

on page 844, column 1:

for:

‘
  2932 29 90
  ’,

read:

‘
  2932 20 90
  ’.

---
***Exhibit 32.2***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q/A of Abakan Inc. for the quarterly period ended November 30, 2010,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, MarkW. Sullivan, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adoptedpursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of myknowledge and belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: September 23, 2011

 

 

/s/ Mark W. Sullivan

Mark W. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOHN L. COOPER, JR.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 203 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

JOHN L. COOPER, JR.,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 204 MAL 2015

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 19th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periodspresented. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Christopher Johns                          |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                               |
| Name:  | Christopher      Johns                             |
|   |                                               |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer and      Director |
|   |                                               |
| Date:  | April      13, 2009                                |
|   |                                               |
|   |                                               |
| By:    | /s/      Michael Palasick                          |
|   |                                               |
| Name:  | Michael      Palasick                              |
|   |                                               |
| Title: | Principal      Financial Officer                   |
|   |                                               |
| Date:  | April      13, 2009                                |
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Karen Aalders, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Management Corporation



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



|                  |     |                        
|----------------- | --- | -----------------------
|November 17, 2008 | By: | /s/ KAREN AALDERS      
|                  |     | Karen Aalders          
|                  |     | Chief Financial Officer
Albany 

Atlanta 

Brussels 

Denver 

McKenna Long &Aldridgew· 

1676 International Drive • Penthouse 

Mclean, VA22102 

Northern Virginia 

Orange County 

Rancho Santa Fe 

San Diego 

Los Angeles 

Tel: 703.336.8800 

mckennalong.com 

San Francisco 

Miami Seoul 

New York Washington, DC 

MARK E. MCKINNON 

703.336.8708 

EMAIL ADDRESS 

mmckinnonf@mckennalong.com 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

January 7, 2015 

Re: FAA-2014-0845- Response to Request for Additional Information in 

Support of Perfect View Aerial Media's Petition for Exemption Pursuant to 

Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

In response to a request for additional information in support of the above Petition for 

Exemption, Perfect View Aerial Media states as follows: 

1. The aircraft's cruising speed is 40 miles per hour. 

2. Perfect View Aerial Media will not perform any flight operations within 5 

nautical miles of the airport reference point as denoted on a current FAApublished aeronautical chart without prior written permission from the airport 

operator and applicable air traffic control. 

3. Please update the Petitioner's current mailing address, which is: 

5379 Lyons Rd 

Suite 108 

Coconut Creek FL 33073 
U.S. Department of Transportation 

January 7, 2015 

Page2 

If you have additional questions or need furtl1er information, please do not hesitate to 

call. 

MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE 

~~Mark E. McKinnon, 

--Esq.
SHARE

# Experts List

The following ORNL scientists and engineers are available as information resources for media. For assistance in scheduling interviews, please contact the Communications team at 865.576.1946.
# L_2012004EN.01001401.xml

| 7.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 4/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 4/14

---

DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

of 13 December 2011

on mobilisation of the European Union Solidarity Fund, in accordance with point 26 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management

(2012/6/EU)

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (1), and in particular point 26 thereof,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 of 11 November 2002 establishing the European Union Solidarity Fund (2),

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Whereas:

| (1) | The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the ‘Fund’) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The European Union has created a European Union Solidarity Fund (the ‘Fund’) to show solidarity with the population of regions struck by disasters.

| (2) | The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the Fund within the annual ceiling of EUR 1 billion.

| (3) | Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Regulation (EC) No 2012/2002 contains the provisions whereby the Fund may be mobilised.

| (4) | Spain submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by an earthquake, and Italy submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by flooding. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Spain submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by an earthquake, and Italy submitted an application to mobilise the Fund, concerning a disaster caused by flooding.

HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

For the general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2011, the European Union Solidarity Fund shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 37 979 875 in commitment and payment appropriations.

Article 2

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Strasbourg, 13 December 2011.

For the European Parliament

The President

J. BUZEK

For the Council

The President

M. SZPUNAR

---

(1)  
  OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 311, 14.11.2002, p. 3.

2

---
Exhibit 10.39_Amendment No. 12_Bonnett Employment Agreement






Exhibit 10.39






AMENDMENT NO. 12, dated as of January 2, 2014, 
to that Employment Agreement dated April 1, 2002 (the "Agreement") 
by and between David Bonnett (the "Executive") and 
AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. (the "Company").


Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


1.    Paragraph 1a of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:


Employment Term.  The Company shall employ Executive until March 31, 2015 (the "Employment Term") on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in this Agreement.  The Agreement shall be considered effective as of April 1, 2002 (the "Effective Time").


All other terms and conditions of Your Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect (unless modified above).


IN WITNESS WEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 12 as of the date first written above.


                                	
				
	AMERICAN MEDIA, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ David Pecker
	 
	 

	 
	David Pecker
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ David Bonett
	 
	January 3, 2014

	 
	David Bonnett
	 
	Date
exhibit104.htm - Generated by SEC Publisher for SEC Filing



  





 


GREEN FOREST MANAGEMENT CONSULTING INC.


 


FORM OF PROMISSORY NOTE



 


 


 


TWD $1,214,398,015


 


Dated: August 11, 2014


 


 


For value received, and pursuant to the Land Sale and Purchase Agreement dated August 11, 2014, Green Forest Management Consulting Inc. promises to pay the Sellers of certain lots of land in Zaoqiao Township and Touwu Township, Miaoli County, Taiwan (R.O.C.), Chen, Kuan-Yu(the "Land Seller") the sum of One Billion Two Hundred Fourteen Million Three Hundred Ninety Eight Thousand Fifteen New Taiwan Dollars (TWD $1,214,398,015). The Land Seller's ownership interest in this Promissory Note is detailed on Annex A to this Promissory Note.


 


The sum shall be repaid to the Land Seller on or before August 11, 2014 according to the instructions of the Land Seller.


 


Green Forest Management Consulting Inc.


 


 


By:  /s/ Chiang, Yu-Chang                   


Chiang, Yu-Chang


Director


Green Forest Management Consulting Inc. 


Rm. B302C, 3F.-2, No. 185, Kewang Rd.


Longtan Township, Taoyuan County 325


Taiwan (R.O.C.)


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 




1


 









 


  





 


Annex A



 


PROMOSSORY NOTE HOLDERS


 


 




	

   Note Holder
	

   Land Lot
	

   Land Number
	

   (m2)
	

   Total Area of Registered Land
	

   Value of Interest (TWD)

	

   Chen, Kuan-Yu
	

   Dataoping Section, Zaoqiao Township, Miaoli County, Taiwan (R.O.C.)


    
	

   65, 67, 68, 69, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81-1, 81-2, 81-5, 83, 83-1, 86, 87, 87-1, 88, 529, 530, 531, 532, 533, 534, 536, 537, 538, 540, 541, 542, 580, 580-1, 582, 583, 628-1, 628-2, 628-4, 646, 646-3, 647-3, 647-4, 647-5, 647-6, 647-8, 647-11, 647-13, 647-14, 647-19, 647-21, 648, 655, 655-1, 655-2, 655-3, 655-4, 655-5, 655-8, 655-10, 655-12, 656, 657, 658, 659, 660, 661, 661-3, 662, 663, 666-1, 668-3, 670, 671, 672, 673, 674, 675, 676, 677, 678, 679, 680, 680-1, 680-2, 680-3, 680-4, 680-5, 681, 682, 683, 684, 684-1, 685, 686, 687, 687-1, 687-2, 688, 689, 691, 693, 694, 695, 695-1, 696, 697, 699, 699-1, 699-2, 699-3, 699-4, 699-12, 699-13, 699-15, 699-15, 699-19, 699-21, 699-23, 699-24, 700, 701, 703, 703-1, 711
	

   453,294.86
	

   463,414.86
	

   $1,214,398,015

	

   Laotianliao Section, Touwu Township, Miaoli County, Taiwan (R.O.C.)
	

   19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 411, 422, 423, 425, 429, 432-2, 432-5
	

   10,120
April 20, 2016

Mr. Keith Stephens

President

Superior Concept AP

5111 Keiners Lane

Pittsburgh, PA 15205

Dear Mr. Stephens:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption. It 

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your September 23, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Superior Concept AP 

filed in Docket No. FAA–2015–4110, but we are unable to process your request any further as 

a result of a discrepancy in your petition. The name of the petitioner is inconsistent in your

petition. For us to consider the request any further, you must clarify the name of the 

petitioner and resubmit a revised petition to your docket. 

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, you may call the 333 Information Line at (202) 267–2999.

Sincerely,

\s\

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SN Strategies Corp. a Nevada corporation
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007, as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Michael A. Hawks, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies
      to the best of her knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      SN Strategies Corp., and will be retained by SN Strategies Corp. and furnished
      to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.








/s/
                Michael A. Hawks
 Michael
          A. Hawks


Chief
      Executive Officer


November
      2, 2007
# ORIGINAL

IN SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA LEONARD HIGGINS, ) ) Cause No.DA 18-0233 ) Appellant, ) ) ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW vs. ) AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD ) STATE OF MONTANA, )

Respondent. ) ) Upon review ofthe Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Record,filed by Herman A. Watson, IV, as counsel for the respondent, Leonard Higgins, in this case, tlic Court now enters the following order: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED,that Herman A. Watson,IV,be withdrawn as attorney ofrecord.

2r - c4 Dated this ,j) day Of

cc: [ ]

Herman A. Watson,IV [ ] Steven Gannon,Prosecutor [ ]Leonard Higgins (via attorney) , 2020. HONORABLE MIKE M R MONTANA SUPRF.ME COURT JUDGE 

# FILED APR 03 2020 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana 04/03/2020 Case Number: DA 18-0233
OPM.gov / 

Skip to main content

### In this section

# Telework Program Development

OPM consultants can help an agency develop and implement a telework program or pilot by writing program policies, developing procedures, communicating the policies to employees, developing telework agreement plans, providing trainings, and responding to the annual data call.

OPM consultants can assist agencies to ensure that the policy meets OPM's policy guidance. Effective communication and comprehensive telework agreements are essential to the success of a telework program. With a strategic plan, consultants and agencies can develop a marketing plan to communicate the benefits and parameters of the telework program. The communications can include marketing materials and tactics to facilitate buy-in from management and encourage employee participation.

Successful programs require building the organizational systems and people competencies necessary for affecting change. OPM consultants can help agencies:
              - Set telework program goals
              - Establish telework program metrics and targets to track goal progress and achievement
              - Perform action planning to identify key activities to achieve program goals
              - Implement processes to track performance data and efficiently respond to the annual data call

OPM can also provide key indicators to determine the effectiveness of communication and change of management. An agency can opt to use the Telework Satisfaction Survey to evaluate the effectiveness of the telework program or pilot program.

## Goal Setting

OPM challenges agencies to consider what they are trying to achieve, to think big and develop a vision for change with telework that will inspire senior executives and employees alike. OPM consultants can assist agency Telework Program Officers, leadership and managers, and key stakeholders in defining that vision for change, setting goals to achieve the vision, and establishing telework program metrics to evaluate success and track progress.

For more information about telework program development, contact us at HRStrategy@opm.gov.