alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### MUMFORD v. STATE.

No. 15108.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1932.

Simpson, Brewster & Rogers, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

The offense isl seduction; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The prosecutrix gave testimony embodying the elements of the offense as defined by statute, article 505, P. O., 1925. For corroboration the state relied upon the father and mother of the prosecutrix, each of whom detailed circumstances which, if believed to be true by the jury, would have been sufficient to comply with the statute demanding corroboration. In the Code of Criminal Procedure (1925) is found article 709', which reads as follows:

> “In prosecutions for seduction, the female alleged to have been seduced shall be permitted to testify; but no conviction shall be had upon her testimony unless the same is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged.”

It has been many times declared by this court that, under the statute quoted, it is essential that the corroboration of the prose-cutrix extend to the promise of marriage and the act of intercourse. See Woolley v. State, 50 Tex. Cr. R. 214, 96 S. W. 27; Slaughter v. State, 86 Tex. Cr. R. 527, 218 S. W. 767; Brewer v. State, 93 Tex. Cr. R. 213, 246 S. W. 663; Gainer v. State, 89 Tex. Cr. R. 538, 232 S. W. 830; McCoy v. State, 91 Tex. Cr. R. 655, 241 S. W. 166; Ford v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 45 S.W.(2d) 213.

In the present instance, the only charge given upon the subject mentioned is in the following language: “You are instructed that ‘seduction,’ as used in the statute, means to lead an unmarried female under 25 years of age away ’from the path of virtue; to entice or persuade her by means of a promise of marriage to surrender her chastity, and have carnal intercourse with the man making the promise. The promise of marriage by the *833man, and the yielding of her virtue in consideration of that promise, constitute the gist of the offense. The offense is not complete until the female has been seduced — that is, corrupted, deceived, drawn aside from the path, of virtue which she was pursuing, and it must be shown that the camal intercourse with the female was accomplished by means of a promise to marry her, made at the time of the illicit intercourse.”

The insufficiency of this charge was asserted by exception thereto, and its correction was sought by a proper special charge, which was refused. The instruction given by the court is not regarded as complying with the law to which reference has been made, and is not more specific in following the statutory command than in numerous other cases in which the incompleteness of the charge has been declared on appeal.

Because of the failure of the court to instruct the jury touching the meaning of article TOO, supra, the judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
# L_2011102EN.01001301.xml

| 16.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 102/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 102/13

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 374/2011

of 11 April 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Farina di castagne della Lunigiana (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Farina di castagne della Lunigiana’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Farina di castagne della Lunigiana’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 April 2011.

For the Commission On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 220, 14.8.2010, p. 14.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Farina di castagne della Lunigiana (PDO)

---
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 19184.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 10, 1937.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 26, 1938.

*469W. E. Myres, of Fort Worth, and H. J. Cureton, Jr., and W. E. Cureton, both of Meridian, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

Upon an indictment charging murder with malice aforethought, the appellant was convicted of murder without malice.

This is the second appeal. The evidence adduced in the present case is not materially different from that which is adequately stated in the opinion on the former appeal. See Johnson v. State, 130 Tex.Cr.R. 596, 95 S.W.2d 968. A repetition of the evidence is not thought necessary; suffice it to say that the facts are deemed sufficient to support the conviction.

The rights of the appellant were fully protected in the charge of the court against which no objection was addressed.

In his motion for new trial appellant complains of certain misconduct of the jury in their deliberation. In overruling the motion the trial judge states that evidence was heard thereon. In the absence of such evidence this court must presume that the trial judge did not abuse the discretion vested in him by law.

Perceiving no error justifying a reversal, the judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant urges that the evidence is insufficient to support the judgment, but demonstrates that he was acting in self-defense. The question thus raised has made it necessary to again review the facts. We find ourselves unable to agree with appellant.- It is not necessary to set the evidence out at length, but it is such as would support a finding by the jury that appellant was not acting in self-defense when he shot deceased, but that appellant had struck deceased twice on the head with a pistol and then shot him in the back while deceased was running away from appellant.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2998 Referred in House (RFH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2998

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 6, 2000

          Referred to the Committee on International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate a fellowship program of the Peace Corps promoting the work 
of returning Peace Corps volunteers in underserved American communities 
             as the ``Paul D. Coverdell Fellows Program''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Paul D. Coverdell Fellows Program 
Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress makes the following findings:
            (1) Paul D. Coverdell was elected to the George State 
        Senate in 1970 and later became Minority Leader of the Georgia 
        State Senate, a post he held for 15 years.
            (2) Paul D. Coverdell served with distinction as the 11th 
        Director of the Peace Corps from 1989 to 1991, where he 
        promoted a fellowship program that was composed of returning 
        Peace Corps volunteers who agreed to work in underserved 
        American communities while they pursued educational degrees.
            (3) Paul D. Coverdell served in the United States Senate 
        from the State of Georgia from 1993 until his sudden death on 
        July 18, 2000.
            (4) Senator Paul D. Coverdell was beloved by his colleagues 
        for his civility, bipartisan efforts, and his dedication to 
        public service.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION OF PAUL D. COVERDELL FELLOWS PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Effective on the date of enactment of this Act, 
the program under section 18 of the Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 2517) 
referred to before such date as the ``Peace Corps Fellows/USA Program'' 
is redesignated as the ``Paul D. Coverdell Fellows Program''.
    (b) References.--Any reference before the date of enactment of this 
Act in any law, regulation, order, document, record, or other paper of 
the United States to the Peace Corps Fellows/USA Program shall, on and 
after such date, be considered to refer to the Paul D. Coverdell 
Fellows Program.

            Passed the Senate July 27, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
# C_2012334EN.01000201.xml

| 31.10.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 334/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.10.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 334/2

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 29 October 2012

appointing an alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for Denmark

2012/C 334/02

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 1365/75 of 26 May 1975 on the creation of a European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (1), and in particular Article 6 thereof,

1

Having regard to the lists of candidates submitted to the Council by the Governments of the Member States and by the employees' and employers' organisations,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decisions of 22 November 2010 (2), 7 March 2011 (3), 12 July 2011 (4) and 20 September 2011 (5), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending on 30 November 2013, with the exception of certain members. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decisions of 22 November 2010 (2), 7 March 2011 (3), 12 July 2011 (4) and 20 September 2011 (5), the Council appointed the members and alternate members of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending on 30 November 2013, with the exception of certain members.

2

3

4

5

| (2) | The employees' organisation ETUC has submitted a nomination for one post to be filled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The employees' organisation ETUC has submitted a nomination for one post to be filled,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is appointed alternate member of the Governing Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions for the period ending on 30 November 2013:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES' ORGANISATIONS

| Country | Member | Alternate |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Denmark | | Ms Heidi RØNNE MØLLER |

Country

Member

Alternate

Denmark

Ms Heidi RØNNE MØLLER

Article 2

The Council will appoint the members and alternate members not yet nominated at a later date.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Luxembourg, 29 October 2012.

For the Council

The President

E. FLOURENTZOU

---

(1)  OJ L 139, 30.5.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 322, 27.11.2010, p. 8.

2

(3)  OJ C 83, 17.3.2011, p. 4.

3

(4)  OJ C 208, 14.7.2011, p. 3.

4

(5)  OJ C 278, 22.9.2011, p. 2.

5

---
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350)
     /s/ Charles E. RameyCharles E. RameyChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**STATEMENT
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**








Pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, John
      L.
      Petersen, Chief Financial Officer of Stirling Acquisition Corporation (the
      "Company"), hereby certifies that:





The
      Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended September 30, 2008
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                John L. PetersenJohn
                L. Petersen, Chief Financial OfficerDated:
                November 17, 2008
# Cover

# Guide to SysForms Columns

# v5.3 Final Sys Forms Mapping
EXHIBIT 32




<PAGE>

In connection with the Quarterly  Report of Strainwise,  Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2015 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"),  Erin Phillips,  the Principal Executive and
Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that to
the best of her knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


September 21, 2015                  By: /s/ Erin Phillips
                                        ---------------------------------
                                        Erin Phillips, Principal Executive
                                            and Financial Officer
#### FOLTZ v. STATE.

No. 20183.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

Harvey W. Lindsay, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is robbery with firearms; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for life.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

*1010PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

DANNY R. BROWN, 

Claimant-Appellant, 

v.

ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS 

AFFAIRS, 

Respondent-Appellee. 

__________________________ 

2013-7062

__________________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for 

Veterans Claims in No. 11-1403. 

__________________________ 

ON MOTION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Danny R. Brown moves for leave to proceed in forma 

pauperis.

Upon consideration thereof, 

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

The motion is granted. 

Case: 13-7062 Document: 13 Page: 1 Filed: 04/17/2013
DANNY BROWN v. SHINSEKI 2

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Jan Horbaly 

 Jan Horbaly

 Clerk

s24 

Case: 13-7062 Document: 13 Page: 2 Filed: 04/17/2013
Exhibit 33.3



|                                                 |  |                                                                                                            
|------------------------------------------------ |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO  3000 Leadenhall Road
 Mt. Laurel, NJ 08054 |  | Glen A. Messina
President and CEO  Tel: (856) 917-6847 Fax: (856) 917-6145 glen.messina@phh.com www.phh.com





REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014
(the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and
(d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set
forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party; however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing
of these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well as all re-securitization transactions after January 1,
2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the Platform).

The Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the
Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment of
compliance with the Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage Corporation

Date: February 26, 2015



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Glen A. Messina                   
|Glen A. Messina                       
|President                             
|                                      
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
Ja n 2 0 1 2 09:42 a Microsof t 

### 1907241220 8 p. 2



### Januar y 19th , 201 Z KARLU KiR A TR(5A L COUNCI L P.O . 30 K2 2 KARLUK , AlASKA9960 B karlukiracouncii^aoKco m 907-24^X-2218<PhQne )

Essentia l Ai rServic e Offic e o 1 Aviatio n Analysi s U. S Departmen t o f Transportatio n Attn : Mr . Kevi n Adam s 1:H} 0 Ne wJerse yAve . S £ Washingto n D.C . Z059 0 

### 1.Z0Z-36&-1047 (phone ] i-202-366.76S 8 (fax) Re : Essentia ! Ai rServic e Contrac t fo rKarluk . :x- ^ -i. - ' - J a y U J :'-lV; : -

."-1 - • .- ^ .

_ , ' ,-'.. . --•' • 

### 1- -^: ; :; a i^Orr - rn-X3n- 5 ~^("-> 0 '-.--'^-n- 1 c n Dea rMr . Adams ; Th e Kariu k

IR ATriba l Counci l woul d lik e to endors e Andre wAirway s fo rtli e essentia ! Ai rServic e Contrac t tha t i s u p fo rbi d thi s yea r<201Z) . Artdre w Airway s lia s Differe d a tremendou s servic e t o ou rcommunit yfo ryear s an d especiall y thi s las t year . W e fee l tha t thei rairlin e i s ver yconsciou s o f th e need s tha t th e communit yo f Kariul cha s whe n i t come s t o transportation . The yhav e bee n servin g Kariu k wh h n o subsid ywhic h i s reall ygreat ; however , w e fee l tha t w e nee d t o suppor t a n airirn e tha t support s us . Ou rCommunit yha s bee n i/npacte d i n man ydifferen t way s ove rth e year s economicall yan d w e fee l Andre wAirway s woul d servic e th e communit yth e bes t ou t o f th e fe wcarrier s availabl e o n Kodlal cIsland . Than k yo u fo ryou rtim e Kariu k IR A Triba l Counci l Memi>er s / 

## -^ e .toyc e Jon ^

• > . 1 <' . Kathry n Ref t Glady s Charliaga a < Sara h Waseli e 

# h . 1^ 1 

# '-y. 

# 1 Mar yM . Reft ' ' f ^^ - yi Cc : File s 

## r d
### SERVE D NOVEMBE R3 , 201 0 ..p.^ENTO F i-,AMSPORTAT10 N U.S
. DEPARTMEN T O FTRANSPORTATIO NrYff OPERATION

S OFFIC EO FHEARING S WASHINGTON , D C /iiJ O MO V -L | A R

: 2 S
INTH EMATTE RO F 

### INTERTEC H OVERLOAD , INC
. FA A DOCKE T NO
. CPI0WP000 3 (Civi l Penalty Action ) DMSNo
. FAA-2010-019 4 

### HEARIN G NOTIC E Paragrap h# 2 o f

th e Procedura l Orde r

i s amende da s follows : WHEREFORE , th e partie s b e an dar e hereb y ORDERE D t o adher e t o th e followin g procedura l schedule :

.. . O n o r before Februar y 1 , 2011 , th e partie s shal l conclud e al l discovery including , bu t

no t limite dto , depositions , documen t production , response s t o productio nrequest s and/o r interrogatories
. I f

th epartie s canno t

resolv e a discovery disput e the y shal l submi t th e disput e t o th e undersigne dfo r resolutio n inatimel y manner.. . NOTIC EI S HEREB Y GIVE Ntha t testimon y an devidenc e wil l b e hear dan dconsidere d o nMarc h7 an d8 , 2011 , inclusive , i nth e Nationa l Transportatio nSafety Boar d Courtroom , 151 5 W
. 190t hStreet
. St e 555 , Gardena , C A 90248
. Hearing s wil l commenc e at

9:0 0 a.m . an dconclud e at 4:3 0 p.m . eac hday
. Settle dcase s wil l no t b e remove dfro mth e docke t unti l th e Judg e receive s th e prope r pleading(s)
. Pleading s ma y b e forwarde db y fax , expres s mail , courigjuu ^ posta l service
.

U.S
. Administrativ e La w Judg e Attachmen t

- Servic e Lis t

ti

.

# I

FA ADocke t

No
. CP10WP000 3 p (Civi l Penalt y Action ) ^ p SERVIC ELIS T l ( ORIGINA L& ON ECOP Y r ! f- • Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio n! ? 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W
. | ; Washington , D C 2059 1 | | Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 | ; Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Suit e 2W1000 ' Ij

O N ECOP Y p t : Willia mH
. Schultz , Respondent' s Counse l I ? Schult z La w Fir m| ' 3212 3 Linder o Canyo nRoad , Suit e 20 3 f { Westlak e Village , C A91361-541 2 1 ' TEL : 818-901-191 9 I ; FAX : 818-901-199 6 |

- Dea nCambe , Sr. , Presiden t 1 1 Intertec hOverload , Inc. , Responden t f I 770 1 Woodle y Avenu e 1 1 VanNuys,C A9140 6 U CornXno y AdoX^Yi , Complainant' s Counse l | ' Offic e o f th e Regiona l Counse l U Western-Pacifi c Region , AWP- 7 | { Federa l Aviatio nAdministratio nI ? P.O
. Bo x 9200 7 1 1 Lo s Angeles , C A90009-200 7 • I i TEL : 310-725-712 8 % FAX : 310-725-681 6 i H E Th e Honorabl e Richar dC
. Goodwin , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S
. Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E
. Eas t Buildin g Groun dFloor , Roo mEl2-32 0 Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : Attorney-Adviso r

202-366-213 9 Lega l Assistan t

202-366-512 1 FAX : 202-366-753 6

' Servic e wa s b y U.S
. Mail
. Fo r servic e inperso no r

b y expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Hearin g Docket , Federa l Aviatio nAdministration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbu r Wrigh t Buildin g - Roo m 2014 , Washington , D C 20591 , Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-430
.