alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SHARE

# Grid SecuRe

                  -  Clean Energy 

## Developing solutions for secure, resilient energy infrastructure

Energy sector infrastructure is essential to modern life and economic prosperity, yet it is increasingly vulnerable to both natural and manmade threats such as damaging storms and cyber disruption. Power grid security and resilience is a cross-cutting technical challenge that continues to emerge and gain complexity. Through collaboration with industry partners, Oak Ridge National Laboratory is developing science and technology solutions to enable a secure and resilient national grid.

Our strategy spans both information and operational technologies, focusing our research and development efforts on challenges from the device level to the interactions of systems-of-systems.

View a hi-res version of this image

## Networked Microgrids 

Creating the controls and modern protection devices needed to securely network regional microgrids for grid stability and resilience.

View a hi-res version of this image

## Situational Awareness

Addressing the need for greater situational awareness by developing low-cost, high-fidelity, easily deployed sensors to constantly monitor the grid state. Modeling of the national grid to better understand its complex interdependencies.

View a hi-res version of this image

## Transactive Controls

Harnessing grid-edge devices to develop and deploy precise, automatic control of building loads to stabilize and secure the grid while providing comfort and savings.

##  

## DarkNet 

DarkNet is designed to effectively shield the nation’s critical infrastructure assets from disruptive cyber and cyber-physical intrusion via public and commercial communication networks. To accomplish this, DarkNet will develop and implement a highly secure, resilient, communication architecture that includes critical information technologies, sensing, and advanced cybersecurity solutions to support all elements of the electricity enterprise and its supply chain. When fully implemented, it will ensure national continuity of operations, enable rapid restoration, and facilitate cost-effective, protective measures to mitigate the impact of cyberattacks, operational and physical threats, and natural disaster.

Grid Operations Analytics Laboratory 

The new GRID-C Facility at ORNL brings together the lab’s SecuRe activities, including the Grid Operations and Analytics Lab (GOAL), testbeds for new smart grid controls and protection hardware and software, cyber-resilience testing, advanced power electronics, sensor platform R&D, transactive control of grid-edge devices, and grid-scale energy storage, and extreme fast-charging of electric vehicles.
#### Ex parte Henry MASSINGILL.

No. 20308.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Criminal District Court of Dallas - County, Texas, denying relator the relief as prayed for in his writ of habeas corpus.

Since his appeal to this court was perfected, the relator has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking for the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
### Conference Call with Tribal Envi ronmental Professionals July 18, 2007 Meeting Note to the Docket

Discussion Topics On July 18, 2007, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) participated in a meeting with interested tr ibal environmental professionals to start a workgroup focused on implementation of the ru le titled: “Review of New Sources and Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the following:

 Purpose of the workgroup  Ideas for the rule’s implementation plan  How to set implementation priorities  Types of outreach needed  Tribal consultation on permit issuances  How to help tribes that want de legation of the federal NSR program  What kinds of training is needed  Frequency of workgroup calls and meetings
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 23-0063

_________________

JOE LEE,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

DEAN SKINNER,

 Defendant and Appellee.

CHRIS SKINNER,

 Defendant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Joe Lee, to all counsel of record, and 

to the Honorable David J. Grubich, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 30 2023

08/30/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0063
# L_2012199EN.01000301.xml

| 26.7.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 199/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 199/3

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 July 2012

on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in parts and components of motor vehicles between the European Union and the Russian Federation

(2012/429/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 207(4) in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a) thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Having regard to the consent of the European Parliament,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with Council Decision 2012/106/EU (1), the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in parts and components of motor vehicles between the European Union and the Russian Federation (‘the Agreement’), was signed on 16 December 2011, subject to its conclusion. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with Council Decision 2012/106/EU (1), the Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in parts and components of motor vehicles between the European Union and the Russian Federation (‘the Agreement’), was signed on 16 December 2011, subject to its conclusion.

| (2) | The Agreement should be approved, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Agreement should be approved,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Russian Federation on trade in parts and components of motor vehicles between the European Union and the Russian Federation, is hereby approved on behalf of the Union (2).

Article 2

The President of the Council shall designate the person(s) empowered to proceed, on behalf of the Union, to make the notification provided for in Article 13(2) of the Agreement in order to express the consent of the Union to be bound by the Agreement (3).

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on the date of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 July 2012.

For the Council

The President

A. D. MAVROYIANNIS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 57, 29.2.2012, p. 14.

1

(2)  The Agreement has been published in OJ L 57, 29.2.2012, p. 15, together with the decision on signing.

2

(3)  The date of entry into force of the Agreement will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General Secretariat of the Council.

3

Official Journal of the European Union

---
## 2001 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit

5-15-2001 

# I n Re: C e nd a n t C or p
P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : D ocke t 00-2185

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al w ork s a t : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2001

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o y ou for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t a t e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit a t V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2001 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr a t or of V i l l a no va U niv e r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m a t ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min
. C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du

. 

## Re c omme nde d C it a t ion

" I n Re: C e nd a n t C or p " (2001). 2001 D e cisio n s . P ape r 102. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no v a . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2001/102

### UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

________________ No. 00-2185

________________ IN RE: CENDANT CORPORATION LITIGATION JANICE G. DAVIDSON; ROBERT M. DAVIDS ON, in his capacity as trustee of Robert M. Davidson Charitable Remainder Unitru st, and as co-trustee of Elizabeth A. Davi dson Irrevocable Trust, Emilie A. Davids on Irrevocable Trust, John R. Davidson Irre vocable Trust, Emilie A. Davidson Charitable Rem ainder Unitrust and John R. Davidson Charita ble Remainder Unitrust, Appellants

________________ On Appeal from the United States District C ourt for the District of New Jersey (D.C. Civil Action No. 98-cv-01664) District Judge: Honorable William H. Wal ls

________________ Argued: November 16, 2000 Before: SLOVITER, AMBRO, and GARTH, Circuit Judges (Filed: May 9, 2001)

_________________________ ORDER AMENDING OPINION

_________________________ The slip opinion in the above case is hereby a mended as follows: 1. On page 40, in the last line of the paragraph captioned "III. Conclusion", the word "Opinion" should not be capitali zed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Thomas L. Ambro Circuit Judge DATED: May 15, 2001
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3062 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District of Columbia 
 submits a performance accountability plan to Congress, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PERFORMANCE ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN.

    Section 456 of the District of Columbia Home Rule Act (section 47-
231 et seq. of the District of Columbia Code) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ``Not later than 
                March 1 of each year (beginning with 1998)'' and 
                inserting ``Concurrent with the submission of the 
                District of Columbia budget to Congress each year 
                (beginning with 2001)''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ``that describe 
                an acceptable level of performance by the government 
                and a superior level of performance by the 
                government''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1) by striking ``1999'' and 
                inserting ``2001''; and
                    (B) in paragraph (2)(A) by striking ``for an 
                acceptable level of performance by the government and a 
                superior level of performance by the government''.

            Passed the Senate October 6 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 3062

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

   To modify the date on which the Mayor of the District of Columbia 
 submits a performance accountability plan to Congress, and for other 
                               purposes.
```
Exhibit 32.1




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Security Agency Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Larry E. Lunger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:




/s/ Larry E. Lunger


Larry E. Lunger


Chief Executive Officer




May 26, 2010
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Belvedere Resources Corporation(the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Shawn Englmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated this 9th day of November, 2009.   Shawn Englmann  Shawn Englmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial   -1-
# L_2011338EN.01001901.xml

| 21.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 338/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 338/19

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1345/2011

of 19 December 2011

implementing Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 of 25 February 2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar (1), and in particular Article 18(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 25 February 2008, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 25 February 2008, the Council adopted Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 renewing and strengthening the restrictive measures in respect of Burma/Myanmar.

| (2) | In accordance with Council Decision 2011/859/CFSP of 19 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/232/CFSP renewing restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar (2), the information relating to one entity on the list in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 should be updated. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with Council Decision 2011/859/CFSP of 19 December 2011 amending Decision 2010/232/CFSP renewing restrictive measures against Burma/Myanmar (2), the information relating to one entity on the list in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 should be updated.

| (3) | Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 should be updated accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008 should be updated accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 194/2008, the entry for Mayar (H.K) Ltd shall be replaced by the following:

| ‘Mayar India Ltd (Yangon Branch) |
| --- |
| 37, Rm (703/4), Level (7), Alanpya Pagoda Rd, La Pyayt Wun Plaza, Dagon, Yangon.’ |

‘Mayar India Ltd (Yangon Branch)

37, Rm (703/4), Level (7), Alanpya Pagoda Rd, La Pyayt Wun Plaza, Dagon, Yangon.’

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 19 December 2011.

For the Council

The President

M. KOROLEC

---

(1)  
  OJ L 66, 10.3.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  See page 55 of this Official Journal.

2

---
07 June 2006

Air Transport Association of America

1301 Pennsylvania Ave. NW

Suite 1100

Washington, DC 20004-1707

Attention: Mr. Joseph White

Director, Engineering

Subject: B737 Static Inverters NPRM

References: (A)NPRM2002-NM-12-AD

(B)Boeing SIB 737-24-1165, rev 1, OCT 20,2005

(C)Boeing SIB 737-24AI166, rev 1, OCT 20,2005

Dear Mr. White,

Alaska Airlines has reviewed the Notice of Proposed Rule Making (NPRM)and

associated reference documents. We have been accomplishing the modifications at

the vendor (AI2)per Boeing Service Bulletin recommendation of 42 months from

June 1, 2005.

We agree with the safety assessment and will comply with the requirements as stated

in the NPRMand service bulletin accomplishment instructions. We support the

proposed compliance interval as long as the vendor (AI2)can support the industry in

this time frame.

Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. If you have any questions or

concerns, please call me at (206) 392-9700.

Regards,

Joseph E. Gockowski III

Manager of Regulatory Compliance

Alaska Airlines

P.O. Box 68900-SEAMJ

Seattle WA98168-0900
# U ni te d S ta te s Co ur t of A pp ea ls For the Eig hth Circu it

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ No. 1 6- 14 89

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ _ M a r tin L u t h e r L i n d s t e d

t , Th e C h u rc h o f J e s u s C h

r i s t C h r i s t i a n / A r y a n N a t i o n s o f M i s s o u

r i ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Pla in ti

ff - App el la nt

v. Newto n C ou nt y , Mis so ur i; Newto n C ou nt y Sh eri ff's Depa rtment; Ken C op el an d, Newto n C ou nt y

Sh eri ff; Oren Barn es ; M ic ha el Lin ds te dt ; Terr y Neff, Att or ne y ; The Hon or ab le Kevi n L. Sel by; The Ho no rab le Tim ot hy Perig o; Cry st al Co ur tn ey

ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll ll l Defe nd

an ts - App el le es

__ __ __ __ __ __ App eal fro m

Uni te d S ta te s Di st ric t Co ur t fo r th e Weste rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i - J op li n

__ __ __ __ __ __ Subm it te d: Octo be r 7, 2 01 6 Fi le d: Octo be r 11 , 20 16 [Un publ is he d]

__ __ __ __ __ __ Befo re WOL LMAN, ARNOLD, andGRUENDER, Circu it Ju dg es .

__ __ __ __ __ __ PER CURI AM.Mar ti n Lut he r Lin ds te dt , The Ch ur ch of Je su s Ch ris t Ch ris ti an /Aryan Nati on s

of Mi ss ou ri ap pe al s th e di st ric t co ur t’s or de rs gr an ti ng mo t i o ns to di sm is s an 1 am en de d co m

pl ai nt fo r fai lu re to st at e a cl ai m . W e fin d no ba si s fo r ov ert ur ni ng th e or de rs at is su e, an d ap pe ll an t ha s id en ti fie d no ne . The jud gm en t of th e di st ric t co ur t is affi rm ed . See 8 th Cir . R. 47 B.

__ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __

The Hon or ab le St ep he n R. Bo ug h, Uni te d St at es Dis tri ct Ju d g e f o r th e 1 W es te rn Dis tri ctof M is so ur i. -2

-
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Homeowners Choice, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2009 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RICHARD R. ALLENRichard R. AllenChief Financial OfficerMay 14, 2009


A signed original of this document has been provided to Homeowners Choice, Inc. and will be retained by
Homeowners Choice, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



35
Exhibit 31.2  Certification Pursuant to pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  I, Janet L. Crance, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:  a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its  subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting.  5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):  a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.   Date: May 15, 2008 /s/ Janet L. Crance Janet L. Crance Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer)