UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549  FORM 10-Q (Mark One) þQuarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the quarterly period endedFebruary 28, 2011.  oTransition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period fromto.  Commission file number:000-52784  ABAKAN INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  Nevada
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
     98-0507522
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
  2665 S. Bayshore Drive, Suite 450, Miami, Florida  33133 (Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip Code)  (786) 206-5368 (Registrants telephone number, including area code)  N/A (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)  Indicate by check markwhether theregistrant: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: YesþNoo.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).YesoNoo.  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act: Large accelerated fileroAccelerated fileroNon-accelerated fileroSmaller reporting companyþ  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): YesþNoo  Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of shares outstanding of the issuers common stock, $0.0001 par value (the only class of voting stock), at April 18, 2011, was 58,541,960.
 1


---



TABLE OF CONTENTS
  PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
  Item 1.
     Financial Statements
     3
  Condensed Balance Sheets for the period ended February 28, 2011 (Unaudited) andMay 31, 2010................................................................................................................ 4Unaudited Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and nine months endedFebruary 28, 2011 and 2010, and cumulative amounts from development stage activities(June 27, 2006 (Inception) through February 28, 2011)................................................ 5Unaudited Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended February 28,2011 and 2010, and cumulative amounts from development stage activities (June 27,2006 (inception) through February 28, 2011)................................................................ 6Condensed Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited).................................................. 7Item 2.
     Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results ofOperations
     18
  Item 3.
     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
     24
  Item 4.
     Controls and Procedures
     24
  PART II  OTHER INFORMATIONItem 1.
     Legal Proceedings
     25
  Item 1A.
     Risk Factors
     25
  Item 2.
     Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     29
  Item 3.
     Defaults upon Senior Securities
     31
  Item 4.
     (Removed and Reserved)
     31
  Item 5.
     Other Information
     32
  Item 6.
     Exhibits
     32
  Signatures
     33
  Index to Exhibits
     34
 2


---



PART I  FINANCIAL INFORMATION  ITEM 1.          FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  As used herein, the terms Company, we, our, and us refer to Abakan Inc. (formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.), a Nevada corporation, unless otherwise indicated.In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements included in this Form 10-Q reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the periods presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
 
 3


---



ABAKAN, INC.
(Formerly known as Waste to Energy Group, Inc.)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETSFebruary 28,
     
     May 31,2011
     
     2010(unaudited)ASSETSCurrent AssetsCash and cash equivalents
     
     
     
     $         3,662
     
     $      40,564Note receivable - related party (Note 9)
     
     
     4,500
     
     8,500Prepaid expenses (Note 5)
     
     
     
     1,246
     
     25,151Prepaid expenses - related party
     
     
     -
     
     14,153Total Current Assets
     
     
     
     9,408
     
     88,368Non-Current AssetsComputer equipment, net (Note 4)
     
     
     2,020
     
     2,526Website, net (Note 4)
     
     
     
     875
     
     3,500Investment deposit on Powdermet investment (Note 6)
     500,000
     
     -Investment deposit on Mesocoat investment (Note 6)
     
     1,260,000
     
     -Investment in Minority Interest - Mesocoat (Note 6)
     
     876,951
     
     1,208,3652,639,846
     
     1,214,391Total Assets
     
     
     
     
     $   2,649,255
     
     $ 1,302,759LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYCURRENT LIABILITIESAccounts payable and accruals
     
     
     $      204,710
     
     $      72,899Accounts payable - related parties
     
     
     174,540
     
     72,071Loans Payable (Note 7)
     
     
     
     153,697
     
     70,156Accrued interest - loans payable (Note 7)
     
     22,639
     
     11,380Loan payable- related party (Note 9)
     
     
     75,760
     
     -Accrued interest - related party (Note 9)
     
     811
     
     -Accrued Liabilities
     
     
     
     391,304
     
     67,261Total Current Liabilities
     
     
     
     1,023,461
     
     293,767COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Note 8)Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 sharesauthorized, none issued and outstanding
     
     
     -
     
     -Common stock, par value $0.0001, 2,500,000,000 sharesauthorized, 58,335,000 issued and outstanding - February 28, 2011,55,115,000 issued and outstanding - May 31, 2010
     
     5,833
     
     5,511Paid in capital
     
     
     
     
     6,336,001
     
     3,018,313Subscription receivable
     
     
     
     (1,750)
     
     (1,750)Subscription payable
     
     
     
     
     -
     
     -Contributed Capital
     
     
     
     
     5,050
     
     5,050Accumulated deficit during the development stage
     
     (4,719,341)
     
     (2,018,132)Total Stockholders' Equity
     
     
     
     1,625,793
     
     1,008,992Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
     
     
     $   2,649,255
     
     $ 1,302,759
      See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 4


---



ABAKAN, INC.
(Formerly known as Waste to Energy Group, Inc.)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONSCumulative amountsfrom developmentstage activitiesFor the three months ended
     
     For the nine months ended
     
     June 27, 2006February 28,
     
     February 28,
     
     (Inception) to2011
     
     2010
     
     2011
     
     2010
     
     February 28, 2011REVENUES
     
     
     
     $                       -
     
     $                  -
     
     $                    -
     
     $                       -
     
     $                  1,596EXPENSESGeneral and administrativeGeneral and Administrative
     
     
     
     47,261
     
     18,372
     
     146,015
     
     25,885
     
     252,419Professional Fees
     
     
     
     51,435
     
     24,773
     
     143,839
     
     62,185
     
     294,393Professional Fees - Related party
     
     
     15,000
     
     7,500
     
     45,000
     
     22,500
     
     90,000Consulting
     
     
     
     259,571
     
     22,800
     
     559,974
     
     29,800
     
     801,944Consulting - Related party
     
     
     
     47,100
     
     48,000
     
     265,700
     
     108,000
     
     805,200Payroll and benefits expense
     
     
     89,423
     
     -
     
     133,444
     
     -
     
     199,705Depreciation
     
     
     
     1,386
     
     2,456
     
     4,150
     
     7,366
     
     27,586Impairment of Asset
     
     
     
     -
     
     -
     
     -
     
     -
     
     180,000Stock Expense on note Conversion
     
     
     23,400
     
     -
     
     60,733
     
     -
     
     203,103Stock options Expense
     
     
     
     347,449
     
     135,067
     
     746,177
     
     135,067
     
     1,059,490Total expenses
     
     
     
     882,023
     
     258,968
     
     2,105,030
     
     390,803
     
     3,913,838Loss from operations
     
     
     
     (882,023)
     
     (258,968)
     
     (2,105,030)
     
     (390,803)
     
     (3,912,242)Interest ExpenseInterest - Loans
     
     
     
     2,480
     
     1,400
     
     14,497
     
     7,462
     
     31,125Interest - Related Party
     
     
     
     811
     
     -
     
     811
     
     2,038
     
     5,442Liquidated damages
     
     
     
     150,000
     
     -
     
     250,000
     
     -
     
     250,000Total interest expense
     
     
     
     153,290
     
     1,400
     
     265,307
     
     9,500
     
     286,566Interest Income
     
     
     
     -
     
     -
     
     2,125
     
     -
     
     4,129Loss on debt settlement
     
     
     
     (1,583)
     
     -
     
     (1,583)
     
     -
     
     (1,583)Equity in MesoCoat loss
     
     
     
     (29,383)
     
     -
     
     (331,414)
     
     -
     
     (523,079)Loss before provision for income taxes
     
     
     (1,066,280)
     
     (260,368)
     
     (2,701,210)
     
     (400,303)
     
     (4,719,341)Provision for income taxes
     
     
     
     -
     
     -
     
     -
     
     -
     
     -NET LOSS
     
     
     
     $       (1,066,280)
     
     $     (260,368)
     
     $     (2,701,210)
     
     $           (400,303)
     
     $         (4,719,341)NET LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED
     
     $                (0.02)
     
     *
     
     $              (0.05)
     
     *WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMONSHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED
     58,209,667
     
     54,098,333
     
     56,546,209
     
     51,528,736* =  less than $(.01) per share
          See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
  5
 5


---



ABAKAN, INC.
(Formerly known as Waste to Energy Group, Inc.)
(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSCumulative amountsfrom developmentstage activitiesFor the nine months ended
     
     June 27, 2006February 28,
     
     (Inception) to2011
     
     2010
     
     February 28, 2011CASH FLOWS FROM DEVELOPMENT STAGE ACTIVITIESNet (loss) from development stage activities
     
     $   (2,701,210)
     
     $        (400,303)
     
     $           (4,719,341)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) bydevelopment stage activities:Depreciation
     
     
     4,150
     
     7,366
     
     27,586Stock options expense
     
     746,177
     
     135,067
     
     1,059,490Stock expense from note conversion
     
     60,733
     
     -
     
     203,103Stock issued for services
     
     213,600
     
     -
     
     403,600Equity in investee loss
     
     331,414
     
     -
     
     523,079Changes in operating assets and liabilities:Accounts receivable
     
     -
     
     (42,686)
     
     -Accounts receivable - related party
     
     4,000
     
     -
     
     (4,500)Prepaid expenses
     
     
     38,058
     
     (26,151)
     
     (1,246)Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
     
     455,854
     
     6,051
     
     667,223Accounts payable - related parties
     
     102,469
     
     (66,865)
     
     167,340Accrued interest - related party
     
     -
     
     -
     
     2,664Accrued interest - loans payable
     
     14,343
     
     (380)
     
     32,939Waste to Energy Group LLC
     
     -
     
     -
     
     180,000Total adjustments
     
     
     1,970,797
     
     12,402
     
     3,261,277NET CASH USED BY DEVELOPMENT STAGE ACTIVITIES
     (730,413)
     
     (387,901)
     
     (1,458,064)CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIESPurchase of computer equipment and website
     
     (1,018)
     
     -
     
     (30,480)Mesocoat Inc- minority interest
     
     (1,260,000)
     
     (1,400,030)
     
     (2,660,030)Powdermet Inc- minority interest
     
     (500,000)
     
     -
     
     (500,000)Waste to Energy Group LLC
     
     -
     
     -
     
     (180,000)NET CASH PROVIDED USED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES
     (1,761,018)
     
     (1,400,030)
     
     (3,370,510)CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIESProceeds from sale of Common Stock
     
     1,833,000
     
     2,300,000
     
     4,011,142Loans payable
     
     
     545,769
     
     (106,069)
     
     691,802Proceeds from loans payable - related party
     
     75,760
     
     -
     
     75,760Loans payable - related party
     
     -
     
     (48,483)
     
     48,483Contributed capital
     
     
     -
     
     -
     
     5,050NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
     
     2,454,529
     
     2,145,448
     
     4,832,237NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
     
     (36,902)
     
     357,517
     
     3,662CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
     40,564
     
     15
     
     -CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
     
     $            3,662
     
     $          357,532
     
     $                    3,662Supplemental Disclosures:Cash paid for income taxes
     
     $                   -
     
     $                     -
     
     $                            -Cash paid for interest
     
     $               964
     
     $                     -
     
     $                            -Supplemental Non-cash Disclosures:Notes and accounts payable converted to stockAccounts payable - related party
     
     $                    -
     
     
     
     $                (64,010)Loans payable
     
     
     (462,228)
     
     
     
     (487,228)Accrued interest
     
     
     (2,272)
     
     
     
     (2,272)Notes payable - related party
     
     -
     
     
     
     (99,515)Accrued interest - related party
     
     -
     
     
     
     (9,724)Common stock
     
     
     467,500
     
     
     
     667,500Subscription payable
     
     (3,000)
     
     
     
     (3,000)Subscription receivable
     
     -
     
     
     
     (1,750)$                    -
     
     
     
     $                             -
  See accompanying notes to financial statements.
  6


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 1  BUSINESS  Abakan Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in the state of Nevada on June 27, 2006, and isin the development stage as definedunder FASB ASC 915-10, "Development Stage Entities."  Abakan Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Waste to Energy Group Inc., was incorporated in the state of Nevada on November 6, 2009. Abakan Inc. and Waste to Energy Group Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger on November 6, 2009. The board of directors of Abakan Inc. and Waste to Energy Group Inc. deemed it advisable and in the best interest of their respective companies and shareholders that Abakan Inc. be merged with and into Waste to Energy Group Inc. with Waste to Energy Group Inc. remaining as the surviving corporation under the name Abakan Inc.  Waste to Energy Group Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Your Digital Memories Inc., was incorporated in the state of Nevada on August 13, 2008. Waste to Energy Group Inc. and Your Digital Memories Inc. entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger on August 14, 2008. The board of directors of Waste to Energy Group Inc. and Your Digital Memories Inc. deemed it advisable and in the best interest of their respective companies and shareholders that Waste to Energy be merged with and into Your Digital Memories Inc. with Your Digital Memories Inc. remaining as the surviving corporation under the name Waste to Energy Group Inc.  The Companys current business plan is to invest in early stage companies. Since such firms are typically pre-commercialization, it is anticipated that for each firm in which the Company decides to invest it will need successive rounds of funding to fund research & development and sales and marketing efforts.  The Companys acquisition strategy is to make sure it negotiates future ownership upfront based on a series of value creating steps whereby it will have the right to continue or discontinue investing based on an investee meeting those milestone steps. This approach allows management to forecast potential financing needs of a firm in stages to plan for the Companys present and future fundraising efforts.  It also gives the Company the right to hedge its investment if it believes an investee is not performing up to the goals that were anticipated during the negotiating process. By doing this, each investee is expected to reach certain operating milestones prior to receiving the next round of fundraising or the Company exercising its next round of acquisition.  NOTE 2  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Basis of Presentation  In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q.  Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Companys financial position as of February 28, 2011, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three and nine months ended February 28, 2011, have been made.  Operating results for the nine months ended February 28, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended May 31, 2011. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year ended May 31, 2010, thereto contained in the Companys Form 10-K.
 7


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010



NOTE 2  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  continued Development Stage Enterprise At February 28, 2011, the Companys business operations had not fully developed and it is highly dependent upon funding and therefore is considered a development stage enterprise.  Reclassifications  Certain amounts in the period ended February 28, 2010 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period ended February 28, 2011 presentation.  Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.  Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions.  NOTE 3  GOING CONCERN The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  The Company has net losses for the period of inception to the period ended February 28, 2011, of $4,719,341, and a working capital deficit of $1,014,053.  These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.  The Companys continuation as a going concern is dependent on its ability to meet its obligations, to obtain additional financing as may be required an ultimately to attain profitability.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  NOTE 4 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT  Property and equipment consisted of the following:  February 28, 2011
     February 28, 2010Cost
     Accumulated Amortization
     Net Book
Value
     Net Book ValueComputer Equipment
     $ 9,480
     $  7,460
     $  2,020
     $  3,231Website
     $21,000
     $20,125
     $     875
     $  5,250Total
     $30,480
     $27,586
     $  2,894
     $  8,481
  Depreciation and amortization expense was $4,150 and $7,366 for the nine months ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. On May 8, 2010, the Company purchased a computer for $916, and November 15, 2010 the Company purchased a printer for $102; these will be depreciated according to the Companys depreciation policy.
 8


---



ABAKAN INC. (Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.) (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE) CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010
 NOTE 5  PREPAID EXPENSES  Prepaid expenses consist of the following at February 28, 2011:  Name
     Description
     
     AmountDr. Rudenskya
     Prepayment on consulting services
     $
     1,050W. L. Macdonald Law Corp.
     Prepayment retainer for legal fees
     
     196Total
     $
     1,246
   NOTE 6 - INVESTMENT IN NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST  Mesocoat, Inc.  MesoCoat, Inc. (MesoCoat) is an Ohio based nanotechnology materials science business in which the Company holds a thirty four percent (34%) equity interest with the option to acquire up to a seventy five percent (75%) interest. On October 25, 2010, November 3, 2010, and January 27, 2011, the Company advanced to Mesocoat $600,000, $500,000, and $160,000, respectively, to represent deposits on the next stage of investment in MesoCoat.  On December 8, 2010, the Company amended the Investment Agreement with MesoCoat to extend the time frame in which it holds the exclusive option to acquire a fully diluted 51% interest in MesoCoat until the later of January 31, 2011 or five business days subsequent to the completion of MesoCoats May 31, 2010 audit. As of February 28, 2011, the Company has made the above discussed deposits on the next stage of its investment, and it plans on completing its next stage of investment before the end of its fiscal year, May 31, 2011.  The Company has analyzed its investment in accordance ofInvestments  Equity Method and Joint Ventures(ASC 323), and concluded that its 34% minority interest investment does give the Company significant influence over Mesocoats business actions, board of directors, or management, and therefore the Company accounts for its investment using the Equity Method. An audit of Mesocoat, by a PCAOB registered auditor for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009 has been substantially completed. The Company has analyzed its investment in accordance with ASC323 and has determined that no impairment of its investment is necessary at this time; since the Companys intention to exercise its future options to increase investment represents level 2 indicators of fair value of its existing investment. In addition, the Company has reduced the amount of its investment by $331,414, which represents its equity in Mesocoats loss, for the period ended February 28, 2011.  Please see below for a discussion on how the planned purchase of ownership in Powdermet affects the Companys investment in Mesocoat.
  
 9


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 6 - INVESTMENT IN NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST - continued  Powdermet, Inc.  Under the terms of the Companys September 7, 2010 amendment to its stock purchase agreement dated June 28, 2010, it entered into a stock purchase agreement with Kennametal Inc. (Kennametal) to purchase from Kennametal596,813 shares, representinga 41% interest in Powdermet, Inc. (Powdermet), in exchange for $1,500,000.  The terms and conditions of the stock purchase agreement required the Company to pay an initial payment of $500,000 to Kennametal on September 7, 2010, and the remainder on or before September 30, 2010. The stock purchase agreement contains additional terms related to monthly liquidated damages in the amount of $50,000 per month starting October 1, 2010. The transaction was to have closed no later than December 31, 2010.  The Company made the initial payment of $500,000 on September 7, 2010 and did not make the payment on the balance as agreed; accordingly the Company recorded liquidating damages of $50,000 per month beginning October 1, 2010, for a total of $250,000 as of the period ended February 28, 2011.  On January 19, 2011, the Company amended the stock purchase agreement with Kennametal to complete the purchase of Powdermet shares from Kennametal no later than February 15, 2011 for $1,150,000. The Company did not make its payment on the balance as agreed. On March 21, 2011, the entered into an accord and satisfaction agreement to fulfill the terms of its agreement and settled the debt in full to Kennametal in the amount of $1,200,000, thereby completing the purchase of 41% interest in Powdermet.  Powdermet is the parent company of MesoCoat. Andy Sherman serves as the chief executive officer of each of Powdermet and MesoCoat in addition to his duties as a member of the Companys board of directors.  The Company has analyzed its investment in accordance ofInvestments  Equity Method and Joint Ventures(ASC 323), and concluded that its 41% minority interest investment does give it significant influence over Powdermets business actions, board of directors, or management, and therefore in future periods the Company will account for its investment using the Equity Method. Although the Company owns 41% of Powdermet, and indirectly an additional 34% of Mesocoat, it still does not have control of Mesocoat, and therefore will continue to account for its investment according to the equity method of accounting.
 10


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 7  NOTES PAYABLE  As of February 28, 2011 and 2010, the Companys loans payable balances consist of:  February 28,Description
     2011
     
     2010Uncollateralized demand note to an unrelated
entity bearing no interest
     $           -
     
     $    10,000Uncollateralized demand note to an unrelated
entity bearing no interest
     -
     
     10,000Uncollateralized demand note to an unrelated
entity bearing 1% interest per annum
     156
     
     156Uncollateralized demand note to an unrelated
entity bearing 8% interest per annum
     70,000
     
     70,000Uncollateralized demand note to an unrelated
entity bearing 8% interest per annum
     83,541
     
     -$       153,697
     
     $     90,156
   The Company also owed $22,639 and $9,949 in accrued interest for the above notes as of February 28, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In the period ended February 28, 2011, the Company paid $964 interest on a previously paid loan payable, and converted $462,228 of loans payable into common stock as part of the private placements discussed in Note 8. As a result of this note conversion the Company incurred a stock expense on note conversions of $60,733.  NOTE 8  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Common Shares  Authorized  The Company has 2,500,000,000 common shares authorized at a par value of $0.0001 per share and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share.  All common stock shares have equal voting rights, are non-assessable and have one vote per share.  Voting rights are not cumulative and, therefore, the holders of more than 50% of the common stock could, if they choose to do so, elect all the directors of the Company.  Common Stock Issuances  For the nine months ended February 28, 2011, the Company issued the following shares:  Private placements  On October 21, 2010, the Company completed a private placement of 1,100,000 shares of common stock for $825,000. This placement was paid for by $425,000 in cash and a conversion of debt owed of $400,000. On the debt conversion the Company also incurred a stock expense on the note conversion of $37,333, and this charge is reflected in its operations statement.
 11


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 8  STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY - continued  Private placements - continued  On October 22, 2010, the Company completed a private placement of 1,660,000 shares of common stock for cash of $1,245,000.  On December 10, 2010, the Company extinguished debt in exchange for 240,000 of its common shares valued at $0.75 per share owed to an individual and an entity in the amounts of $112,500 and $64,500 respectively.  This placement included a subscription payable totaling $3,000. On the debt conversion the Company also incurred a stock expense on note conversion of $23,400, and this charge is reflected in its operations statement.  On January 27, 2011, the Company closed a private placement for $160,000, or 160,000 units consisting of one share of its restricted common stock and one-half share common stock warrant to purchase shares of its common stock, with a purchase price of $1.50 per share and an expiration date of two years from the closing. In connection with this placement the Company had no offering costs for a net of $160,000.   Share based compensation  On November 16, 2010, the Company issued 60,000 shares of its common stock for services performed valued at $60,600.    Warrants Granted  A summary of the common stock warrants outstanding as of the period ended February 28, 2011 is presented below:   Number of WarrantsBalance at June 1, 2010
     2,300,000Granted
     80,000Exercised
     -Forfeited or Expired
     -Balance at February 28, 2011
     2,380,000Exercisable at February 28, 2011
     2,380,000
 12


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 9  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS  As of February 28, 2011 and 2010, the Company had balances totaling $174,540 and $4,345 outstanding in accounts payable - related party, respectively. In addition to related party transactions mentioned elsewhere, the Company is party to below agreements and transactions detailed below:  Consulting Agreements  a)On June 1, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with a company controlled by the spouse of its chief executive officer. The terms of the consulting agreement are $2,500 per month payable in consulting fees and reimbursement to the consultant for all reasonable business expenses incurred by it in the performance of its duties, and rental of office space $1,200, and will be in effect until June 1, 2011. On December 1, 2010, the Company entered into a revised consulting agreement to supersede the above agreement, with the same company as above. The terms of the consulting agreement are $2,500 per month payable in consulting fees and reimbursement to the consultant for all reasonable business expenses incurred by it in the performance of its duties, and rental of office space $2,213, and will be in effect until December 1, 2011. For the period ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, the Company expensed $22,500 and $37,500, respectively, in connection with this contract and their previous contract and are included in consulting fees  related parties. As of February 28, 2011 and 2010, the Company owed $342 and $0, respectively, which amounts are included in accounts payable - related party.  b)On August 20, 2010, the Company entered into a consulting agreement commencing August 1, 2010 with a related individual to perform duties as its chief financial officer. The terms of the consulting agreement are $8,000 per month payable in consulting fees and reimbursement to the consultant for all reasonable business expenses incurred by it in the performance of its duties, and will be in effect until July 31, 2012. The consultant was also granted 200,000 stock options with an exercise price of $0.65 per share; that vest equally over 3 years (see Note 11). For the period ended February 28, 2011 and 2010, the Company expensed $56,000 and $0, respectively, in connection with this contract and such amounts are included in consulting fees  related parties. As of February 28, 2011 and 2010, the Company owed $37,340 and $3,300, respectively, which amounts are included in accounts payable - related party.
 13


---



ABAKAN INC. (Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.) (A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE) CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010
 NOTE 9  RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS - continued  Notes receivable  a)On March 1, 2010 a loan of $25,000 paying 10% interest per annum payable by February 26, 2011 was provided to a company owned by a related party. Interest is payable quarterly or as mutually agreed on. Accordingly the Company has recorded interest income of $1,063 on this note. Additionally on April 21, 2010 a loan of $25,000 paying 10% interest per annum payable by April 16, 2011 was provided to a second company owned by the same related party. Interest is payable quarterly or as mutually agreed on. Accordingly the Company has recorded interest income of $1,063 on this note. On December 1, 2010 the Company applied the balance of one of the above $25,000 notes receivable to their accounts payable balance due to the related party and wrote off $1,583 in accrued interest income, which is reflected in loss of debt settlement on the accompanying statement of operations. The remaining amounts owed to the Company may be assigned to a related party of the unrelated party, and applied to their accounts payable once a final agreement is made. Accordingly, the Company has reflected these notes as a contra-payable to offset the payable balance due to the same individual.  b)On April 29, 2010, the Company entered in to a non-collaterized note receivable with a related company with some common ownership on an interest free basis, payable on demand. During the period ended February 28, 2011, the Company repaid $4,000 cash on this note and has a balance remaining of $4,500.  Prior period adjustment  a)During the current nine months ended February 28, 2011, the Company reclassified consulting fees  related party to payroll expense on its operations statement in the $35,400, because it has  an employment agreement with the employee and adjusted expenses previously recorded in the year ended May 31, 2010.  NOTE 11  STOCK  BASED COMPENSATION  2009 Stock Option Plan  The Companys board of directors adopted and approved a 2009 Stock option Plan (Plan) on December 14, 2009, which provides for the granting and issuance of up to 10 million shares of its common stock. As of the year ended May 31, 2010 the Company had granted 3,150,000 options.  On August 20, 2010, the Company granted 200,000 stock options to its chief financial officer at an exercise price of $0.65 per share. The options expire ten years from the grant date, and vest in equal one third parts on the anniversary of the option grant date.
 14


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 11  STOCK BASED COMPENSATION - continued  On October 19, 2010, the Company granted 1,200,000 stock options to several consultants at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. On November 17, 2010, the Company granted 25,000 stock options to a consultant at an exercise price of $1.01 per share. On November 20, 2010, the Company granted 1,000,000 stock options to a consultant at an exercise price of $1.01 per share. On January 25, 2011, the Company granted 25,000 stock options to a consultant at an exercise price of $1.25 per share. All of these options expire ten years from the grant date, and vest in equal one third parts on the anniversary of the option grant date. After these grants there are 4,400,000 stock options available for future grant under the Plan.  The board of directors administers the Plan, however, they may delegate this authority to a committee formed to perform the administration function of the Plan. The board of directors or a committee of the board has the authority to construe and interpret provisions of the Plan as well as to determine the terms of an award.  The Companys board of directors may amend or modify the Plan at any time.  However, no amendment or modification shall adversely affect the rights and obligations with respect to outstanding awards unless the holder consents to that amendment or modification.  The Plan permits the Company to grant Non-Statutory stock options to employees, directors and consultants.  The options issued under this Plan are intended to be Non-Statutory Stock Options exempt from Code Section 409A.  The duration of a stock option granted under the Plan cannot exceed ten years.  The exercise price of an incentive stock option cannot be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant.  The Plan administrator determines the term of stock options granted under the Plan, up to a maximum of ten years, except in the case of certain events, as described below.  Unless the terms of an optionee's stock option agreement provide otherwise, if an optionee's relationship with the Company ceases for any reason other than disability or death, the optionee may exercise any vested options for a period of ninety days following the cessation of service.  If an optionee's service relationship with the Company ceases due to disability or death the optionee or a beneficiary may exercise any vested options for a period of 12 months in the event of disability or death.  Unless the Plan administrator provides otherwise, options generally are not transferable except by will, the laws of descent and distribution, or pursuant to a domestic relations order.  An optionee may designate a beneficiary, however, who may exercise the option following the optionee's death.  The value of employee and non-employee stock warrants granted during the period ended February 28, 2011 was estimated using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions:  August 20, 2010
     October 19, 2010
     November 17, 2010
     November  20, 2010
     January 25, 2011Expected volatility (based
on historical volatility)
     194.09%
     194.09%
     194.09%
     194.09%
     183.18%Expected dividends
     0.00
     0.00
     0.00
     0.00
     0.00Expected term in years
     10
     10
     10
     10
     10Risk-free rate
     0.95%
     0.95%
     0.95%
     0.95%
     0.95%
 15


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 11  STOCK BASED COMPENSATION - continued  The expected volatility assumption was based upon historical stock price volatility measured on a daily basis. The risk-free interest rate assumption is based upon U.S. Treasury bond interest rates appropriate for the term of the Companys employee stock options. The dividend yield assumption is based on the Companys history and expectation of dividend payments.  A summary of the options granted to employees and non-employees under the plan and changes during the period ended February 28, 2010 is presented below:  Number of Options
     
     Weighted Average Exercise Price
     
     Aggregate Intrinsic ValueBalance at June 1, 2010
     3,150,000
     $
     0.60
     $
     2,041,966Granted
     2,450,000
     
     0.85
     
     2,092,266Exercised
     -
     
     0.60
     
     -Forfeited or Expired
     (100,000)
     
     0.39
     
     (39,928)Balance at February 28, 2011
     5,500,000
     $
     0.74
     
     4,094,304Exercisable at February 28, 2011
     933,240
     $
     0.61
     
     573,827Weighted average fair value of options
granted during the year
     
     $
     0.85
  The following table summarizes information about employee stock options under the 2009 Plan outstanding at February 28, 2011:  Options Outstanding
     Options ExercisableRange of Exercise Price
     
     Number Outstanding at February 28, 2011
     
     Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life
     
     Weighted Average Exercise Price
     
     Intrinsic Value
     Number Exercisable at February 28, 2011
     
     Weighted Average Exercise Price
     
     Aggregate Intrinsic Value$
     0.60
     
     2,400,000
     
     10.00 Years
     $
     0.60
     $
     1,450,863
     933,240
     $
     0.61
     $
     573,827$
     0.65
     
     200,000
     
     10.00 Years
     $
     0.64
     $
     129,734
     -0-
     $
     0.00
     $
     -0-$
     0.75
     
     1,600,000
     
     10.00 Years
     $
     0.70
     $
     1,121,941
     -0-
     $
     0.00
     $
     -0-$
     1.01
     
     1,025,000
     
     10.00 Years
     $
     1.00
     $
     1,033,610
     -0-
     $
     0.00
     $
     -0-$
     1.25
     
     25,000
     
     10.00 Years
     $
     1.22
     $
     30,638
     -0-
     $
     0.00
     $
     -0-$
     1.30
     
     250,000
     
     10.00 Years
     $
     1.29
     $
     324,519
     -0-
     $
     0.00
     $
     -0-5,500,000
     
     10.00 Years
     $
     0.74
     $
     4,091,305
     933,240
     $
     0.61
     $
     573,827
 16


---







ABAKAN INC.

(Formerly Waste to Energy Group Inc.)

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTERPRISE)

CONDENSED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the nine months ended January 31, 2011 and 2010

NOTE 11  STOCK BASED COMPENSATION - continued  The total value of employee and non-employee stock options granted during the period ended February 28, 2011, was $2,092,266. During period ended February 28, 2011 the Company recorded $746,177 in stock-based compensation expense relating to stock option grants.  At February 28, 2011 there was $3,031,815 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options granted under the plan.  That cost is expected to be recognized pro rata through January 25, 2014.   NOTE 12  RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS  We have examined all recent accounting pronouncements and believe that none of them will have an material impact on the financial statements of the Company.   NOTE 13 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS  In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) topic 855-10 Subsequent Events,the Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date which the financial statements were available to be issued. The Company has determined that there were no such events that warrant disclosure or recognition in the financial statements except as follows.  ·On March 16, 2011 the Company authorized the issuance of a convertible promissory note to Sonoro Invest SA in the sum of $1,500,000 at a rate of 5% interest per annum, convertible at the option of the holder into $1.00 units consisting of one common share and one half warrant to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share for a period of two years from the conversion. ·On March 21, 2011, the Company entered into an accord and satisfaction agreement to fulfill the terms of its agreement and settled its debt in full to Kennametal in the amount of $1,200,000. ·On March 25, 2011 the Company entered into an Assignment Agreement for the exclusive right to distribute MesoCoats products intended for application specific to the oil and gas pipeline industry. ·On March 25, 2011 the Company authorized the issuance of 150,000 shares of its common stock to a company as consideration for entering into an Assignment Agreement. ·On March 25, 2011 the Company authorized the issuance of 56,960 shares of its common stock to a company as a bonus for amending an Employment Agreement with the companys principal.
  17


---



ITEM 2.         MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  Item 2.MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  ThisManagements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andResults of Operationsand other parts of this current report contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements can also be identified by words such as anticipates, expects, believes, plans, predicts, and similar terms. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and our actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such differences include but are not limited to those discussed in the subsection entitledForward-Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Conditionbelow. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto included in this current report. Our fiscal year end is May 31.  Overview  The Company intends to become a leader in the multi-billion dollar advanced coatings and metal formulations markets by assembling controlling interests in a small portfolio of next generation technology firms. We expect to achieve this goal by investing in R&D firms that have the potential to substantially impact the surface engineering and energy management needs of Fortune 1000 companies and government entities. The Company is actively involved in supporting the R&D, market development, and commercialization efforts of those entities in which it has invested and continues to identify prospective future investments.  We have to date successfully acquired non-controlling interests in MesoCoat, Inc. (MesoCoat), an advanced coatings company based in Ohio, and in MesoCoats parent company, Powdermet Inc. (Powdermet), a metal formulations company based in Ohio. The Company is also currently evaluating future acquisition opportunities to add to its portfolio.  Plan of Operation  The Companys plan of operation for the coming year is to develop its 61% direct and indirect non-controlling equity investment in MesoCoat and position the firm to succeed in commercialization efforts while evaluating whether to increase that investment to 85% pursuant to the terms and conditions of our agreement with the shareholders of MesoCoat. The Company has loaned MesoCoat $1,600,000 against the option to increase its direct equity interest in MesoCoat to 51% and intends to complete the exercise of this option before the end of its fiscal year end.We have also begun to develop our 41% direct non-controlling equity investment in Powdermet towards commercializing its proprietary technology. Further, the Company is constantly seeking out other prospective business acquisitions.  A tremendous need exists today to find better corrosion protection and wear prevention technologies to replace many of the coating materials currently used in the $89 billion coatings industry. MesoCoat offers two such solutions.MesoCoat plans to sell its CermaClad market solution at approximately 20% below the market price of todays corrosion resistant alloy (CRA)clad materials. The ability to decrease below the market price of current offerings is due primarily to the efficiency of the process.MesoCoat expects to sell PComP application services to commercial buyers and the U.S. military.The U.S. Department of Defense has widely publicized that in the future its budgets will be focused on sustaining current platforms rather than developing or producing new ones. MesoCoat offers government agencies the ideal environmentally friendly anti-corrosion/wear resistant material solutions it needs today to sustain current platforms.
 18


---



Powdermet is building new metal formulations as well as providing advanced energy management solutions over a broad range of commercial applications for the transportation, infrastructure and ballistic management markets.  Powdermet has four product families with high commercial potential under development including:  SComP, a family of syntactic metal composites known for their light weight properties and ability to absorb 500% more impact energy when compared to current best practice impact and ballistic materials like aluminum alloys; MComP, a family of nanocomposite metal and metal matrix composites designed to be a market replacement for beryllium, aluminum and magnesium in structural applications; EnComP, a diverse family of engineered microstructure energy based solutions; and SynFoam, a family of structurally insulating syntactic ceramic composites combining strength, high temperature functionality and low thermal conductivity into one multifunctional material.  The Company will require a minimum additional amount of $3,000,000 in debt or equity funding over the next twelve months to fulfill its business plan though it will seek a higher amount to aggressively pursue its commercialization strategy for MesoCoat and Powdermet products. The funding sought is not currently available, though we are in the process of securing verbal commitments from prospective investors for private placements of our restricted common stock. Should we be unable to secure additional financing from outside sources or our existing shareholder base, we will most likely be unable to meet our milestones, and may need to scale back operations. Any shortfall in minimum funding will adversely affect our ability to expand or even continue operations.  Results of Operations  During the nine month period ended February 28, 2011, we (i) focused our efforts on our non-controlling interest in MesoCoat, (ii) progressed our efforts to acquire a non-controlling interest in Powdermet, (iii) strengthened our management team with industry experts, (iii) enlarged our board of directors, (iv) sought financings and a concluded a financing in December 2011 for $2,250,000 to close our respective acquisition agreements with MesoCoat and Kennametal, and (v) continued to identify prospective business opportunities for merger or acquisition. The agreements regarding our investments with MesoCoat and Powermet have advanced as follows:  ·On December 8, 2010, the Company amended the Investment Agreement with MesoCoat to extend the time frame in which it holds the exclusive option to acquire a fully diluted 51% interest in MesoCoat until five business days subsequent to the completion of MesoCoats May 31, 2010 audit, which audit is substantially compete, though not issued, as of the date of this filing.  ·On January 19, 2011, the Companys amended the Stock Purchase Agreement with Kennametal to complete the purchase of Powdermet shares from Kennametal and onMarch 21, 2011, the Company entered into an accord and satisfaction agreement to conclude the terms and conditions of an amended stock purchase agreement pursuant to which the Company purchased from Kennametal 596,813 shares in Powdermet, or 41% interest, in exchange for an aggregate of a previous payment of $500,000 and final payment of $1,200,000. The funding for the final payment was provided by a convertible promissory note issued onMarch 16, 2011 to Sonoro Invest SA in the sum of $1,500,000.  Since investing in MesoCoat we have (i) assisted with interviewing and hiring new senior management, (ii) redefining its market strategy, (iii) improving its branding, (iv) introducing it to several new potential joint commercialization partners, and (v) aggressively getting it to accelerate R&D schedules by negotiating favorable engineering contracts with third parties.
  
 19


---



Subsequent to the period ended February 28, 2011:  ·The Company entered into an Assignment Agreement for the exclusive right to distribute MesoCoats products intended for application specific to the oil and gas pipeline industry.  MesoCoat broke ground on a new 11,000 sq. ft. manufacturing plant in Euclid, Ohio. Full-s cale production from the plant is expected to begin early in 2012. The plant will be able to produce 10,000 square meters of CermaClad tubing per year and will be able to fabricate PComP products for application in the aerospace, oil and gas, mining, and chemical processing industries.  ·MesoCoat signed a Cooperation Agreement with Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.  (Petrobras), to develop and qualify the CermaClad process for the application of CRA (corrosion resistant alloys) to the internal and external surfaces of pipes using proprietary High Density InfraRed (HDIR) lamp technology. Petrobras is a leading integrated oil and gas company headquartered in Rio de Janiero, Brazil, and is the is the largest company in Latin America  ·MesoCoat entered into a collaborative effort with the University of Akron to develop and accelerate commercialization of advanced inorganic coatings directed at reducing the nations $300 billion corrosion problem. The universitys Corrosion and Reliability Engineering (CAREs) program and MesoCoat will perform development, testing and risk reduction of advanced inorganic coatings in a new joint-use facility to be built at the university financed by a $2 million grant. MesoCoat will provide development engineers and technicians to supervise and train university interns as well as their award winning CermaClad high energy density, large area, high speed cladding technology to apply these advanced coatings to various metal surfaces  Management has also spent significant time developing an extensive deal sourcing network, including top international university materials sciences laboratories; government sponsored labs, industry brokers, lawyers and materials sciences association executives, as well enlarging its advisory board with specific technology skills.  Net Losses  For the period from inception until February 28, 2011, the Company incurred net losses of $4,719,341. Net losses for the three month period ending February 28, 2011 were $1,066,280 as compared to $260,368 for the three month period ending February 28 , 2010. Net losses for the nine month period ended February 28, 2011 were $2,701,210 as compared to $400,303 for the nine month period ended February 28 , 2010. The increase in net losses over the comparative periods can be primarily attributed to operating expenses, liquidated damages associated with our agreement to acquire shares of Powdermet, and losses associated with the value of our investment in MesoCoat.  We have never generated sufficient revenue to fund operations and expect to continue to operate at a loss through fiscal 2011.
 20


---



OperatingExpenses  Operating expenses for the three month period ended February 28, 2011 were $882,023 as compared to $258,968 for the three month period ended February 28, 2010. Operating expenses for the nine month period ended February 28, 2011 were $2,105,030 as compared to $390,803 for the nine month period ended February 28, 2010. The increase in operating expenses over the comparative periods can be attributed to increases in general and administrative expenses, stock expense on a note conversion, and stock option expenses. General and administrative expenses include accounting costs, consulting fees, employment costs, and professional fees.  Income Tax Expense (Benefit)  The Company may have a prospective income tax benefit resulting from a net operating loss carry-forward and start up costs that will offset any future operating profit.  Impact of Inflation  The Company believes that inflation has not had a material effect on operations for the period from June 27, 2006 (inception) to February 28, 2011.  Capital Expenditures  The Company has not spent any significant amounts on capital for the period from June 27, 2006 (inception) to February 28, 2011.  Liquidity and Capital Resources  The Company has been in the development stage since inception. As of February 28, 2011 the Company had a working capital deficit of $1,014,053, current assets of $9,408 consisting of cash, note receivable, and prepaid expenses, and total assets of $2,649,255 consisting of current assets, investments in MesoCoat and Powdermet, computer equipment, and a website. As of February 28, 2011 the Company had current and total liabilities of $1,023,461, consisting of accounts payable and accruals, accounts payable to related parties, loans payable and accruals, and accrued liabilities. Stockholders equity in the Company was $1,625,793 as of February 28 , 2011.  For the period from inception until February 28, 2011, the Companys cash flow used in operating activities was $1,458,064. Cash flow used in operating activities for the nine month period ending February 28, 2011, was $730,413 compared to $387,901 for the nine month period ending February 28, 2010. Cash flow used in operating activities during the current nine month period can be attributed to net losses from operations. We expect to continue to use cash flow in operating activities until such time as we realize a gain on our portfolio investments.  For the period from inception until February 28, 2011, the Companys cash flow used in investing activities was $3,370,510. Cash flow used in investing activities for the nine month period ending February 28, 2011, was $1,761,018 as compared to $1,400,030 for the nine month period ending February 28, 2011. Cash flow used in the current period can be primarily attributed to the payment of $1,260,000 to MesoCoat and its payment of $500,000 to Kennametal as a deposit against purchasing an equity interest in Powdermet. Since the end of the period we have used cash flow in investing activities by concluding our purchase of Powdermet shares and expect to use additional cash flow in investing activities to increase our investment in MesoCoat.
 21


---



For the period from inception until February 28, 2011, the Companys cash flow provided by financing activities was $4,832,237. Cash flow provided by financing activities for the nine month period ending February 28, 2011 was $2,454,529 as compared to $2,145,448 for the nine month period ending February 28 , 2011. Cash flow provided by financing activities in the current period is attributable to proceeds from the sale of common stock and loans payable. We expect to continue to have cash flow provided by financing activities as the Company completes new rounds of financing as it seeks to build on its investment portfolio.  Our current assets are insufficient to meet our current obligations or to satisfy our cash needs over the next twelve months and as such the Company will require debt or equity financing. We have no commitments or arrangements for this financing though we are pursuing a number of prospective sources that include shareholder loans, the sale of equity, or the procurement of long term debt. We face certain financial obstacles to attracting new financing due to our historical and current record of net losses and working capital deficits. Therefore, despite our efforts we can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain the financing required to meet our stated objectives or even to continue as a going concern.  The Company does not expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future.  The Company has a defined stock option plan and contractual commitments with all of its officers and directors.  The Company has no current plans for any significant purchase or sale of any plant or equipment.  The Company has no current plans to make any changes in the number of employees.  Off Balance Sheet Arrangements  As of February 28, 2011, the Company had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material to stockholders.  Going Concern  The Companys auditors have expressed an opinion as to its ability to continue as a going concern as a result of net losses of $2,018,132 and a working capital deficit of $205,399 as of May 31, 2010, which have increased to $4,719,341 and $1,014,053, respectively, as of February 28, 2011.Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on realizing a profit from operations and gains on investment or obtaining funding from outside sources. Managements plan to address the Companys ability to continue as a going concern includes: (i) obtaining funding from the private placement of debt or equity; (ii) realizing a gain from its investments in MesoCoat and Powermet; and (iii) obtaining loans and grants from financial or government institutions. Management believes that it will be able to obtain funding to allow the Company to remain a going concern through the methods discussed above, though there can be no assurances that such methods will prove successful.
 22


---



Forward Looking Statements and Factors That May Affect Future Results and Financial Condition  The statements contained in the section titledResults of OperationsandDescription of Business, with the exception of historical facts, are forward looking statements. A safe-harbor provision may not be applicable to the forward looking statements made in this current report. Forward looking statements reflect our current expectations and beliefs regarding our future results of operations, performance, and achievements. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and are based upon assumptions and beliefs that may or may not materialize. These statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning:  ·our anticipated financial performance; ·uncertainties related to the commercialization of proprietary technologies held by entities in which we have an investment interest; ·our ability to generate revenue from operations or gains on investments; ·our ability to raise additional capital to fund cash requirements for operations; ·the volatility of the stock market; and ·general economic conditions.  We wish to caution readers that our operating results are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those discussed or anticipated including the factors set forth in the section entitledRisk Factorsincluded elsewhere in this report.  We also wish to advise readers not to place any undue reliance on the forward looking statements contained in this report, which reflect our beliefs and expectations only as of the date of this report. We assume no obligation to update or revise these forward looking statements to reflect new events or circumstances or any changes in our beliefs or expectations, other that is required by law.  Critical Accounting Policies  The notes to the audited consolidated financial statements for the Company for the years ended May 31, 2010 and 2009, included in the Companys most recent Form 10-K filed with the Commission, discussed those accounting policies that are considered to be significant in determining the results of operations and financial position. Our management believes that their accounting principles conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  The preparation of financial statements requires management to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets, warranty obligations, product liability, revenue, and income taxes. We base our estimates on historical experience and other facts and circumstances that are believed to be reasonable, and the results form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. The actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
 23


---



Stock-Based Compensation   We have adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic (ASC) 718, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments. We have adopted Accounting Standards Codification Topic (ASC) 718, formerly SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS No. 123R), Share-Based Payment, which addresses the accounting for stock-based payment transactions in which an enterprise receives employee services in exchange for (a) equity instruments of the enterprise or (b) liabilities that are based on the fair value of the enterprises equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of such equity instruments.  We account for equity instruments issued in exchange for the receipt of goods or services from other than employees in accordance with ASC 505. Costs are measured at the estimated fair market value of the consideration received or the estimated fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The value of equity instruments issued for consideration other than employee services is determined on the earliest of a performance commitment or completion of performance by the provider of goods or services.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements  We have examined all recent accounting pronouncements and believe that none of them will have a material impact on the financial statements of the Company.  ITEM 3.          QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK  Not required.  ITEM 4.          CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures  In connection with the preparation of this report, an evaluation was carried out by the Companys management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  Based on that evaluation, the Companys management concluded, as of the end of the period covered by this report, that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be disclosed, within the time periods specified in the Commissions rules and forms, and such information was accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and the chief financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting  There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during theperiodendedFebruary 28, 2011 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
  
 24


---



PART II  OTHER INFORMATION  ITEM 1.          LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  None.  ITEM 1A.       RISK FACTORS  The Companys operations and securities are subject to a number of risks. Below we have identified and discussed the material risks that we are likely to face. Should any of the following risks occur, they will adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations as well as the future trading price and/or the value of our securities.  We have a history of significant operating losses and such losses may continue in the future. The Company incurred net losses of $4,719,341 for the period from June 27, 2006 (inception) to February 28, 2011. Since we have been without significant revenue since inception and currently have no revenue producing operations outside of that produced from our interests in portfolio investment companies, historical losses may continue into the future.  The Companys success is dependent on its ability to assist its portfolio companies to commercialize their proprietary technologies to the point of generating sufficient revenues to sustain and expand operations. Our future operation is dependent on our ability to assist MesoCoat and Powdermet in the commercial application of their proprietary technologies to produce sufficient revenue to sustain and expand operations. The same successful efforts will be required for any additional investments that are added to the Companys portfolio. The success of these endeavors will require that sufficient funding be available to the Company to assist the development of portfolio investments. Currently, the Companys financial resources are limited, which limitation may slow the pace at which proprietary technologies can be commercialized and deter the prospect of additional portfolio investments. Should we be unable to improve our financial condition through debt or equity offerings, our ability to successfully advance our business plan will be severely limited.  There are significant commercialization risks related to technological businesses.  The industries in which the Companys portfolio companies operate and plan to operate are characterized by the continual search for higher performance and lower cost. Our growth and future financial performance will depend on the ability of our portfolio companies to develop and market products that keep pace with technological developments and evolving industry requirements. Further, the research and development involved in commercializing products requires significant investment and innovation to keep pace with technological developments. Should we be unable to keep pace with outside technological developments, respond adequately to technological developments, or experience significant delays in product development, our products might become obsolete. Should these risks overcome our ability to keep pace there is a significant likelihood that our business will fail.   The Company competes with larger and better financed corporations.  Competition within the industrial coatings industry and other high technology industries is intense. While the Companys products are distinguished by next-generation innovations that are more sophisticated and


cost effective than many competitive products currently in the market place, a number of entities and new competitors may enter the market in the future. Some of our existing and potential competitors have longer operating histories, greater name recognition, larger customer bases and significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do, including well known multi-national corporations. Accordingly, our products could become obsolete at any time. Competitors could develop products similar to or better than our own, finish development of new technologies in advance of the Companys research and development, or be more successful at marketing new products, any of which factors may hurt our prospects for success
 25


---



General economic conditions will affect our operations.  Changes in the general domestic and international climate may adversely affect the financial performance of the Company, MesoCoat and Powdermet. Factors that may contribute to a change in the general economic climate include industrial disputes, interest rates, inflation, international currency fluctuations and political and social reform. Further, the delayed revival of the global economy is not conducive to rapid growth, particularly of technology companies with newly commercialized products.  The market acceptance of the Companys products is critical to the Companys growth.  The Company will generate revenue from the advanced coating industry and other industries. Market acceptance of our products and services will be critical. If our customers do not accept or purchase our products and services, then our revenue, cash flow and/or operating results will be negatively impacted.  We may not be able to effectively manage our growth.  We expect considerable future growth in our business. However, to achieve this growth in an efficient and timely manner, we will have to maintain strict controls over our internal management, technical, accounting, marketing, and research and development departments. We believe that we have retained sufficient quality personnel to manage our anticipated future growth and have adequate reporting and control systems in place. Should we be unable to successfully manage our anticipated future growth by adherence to these strictures, costs may increase, growth could be impaired and our ability to keep pace with technological advances may be impaired which failures could result in a loss of future customers.  We may rely upon patents and other intellectual property.  We may rely on a combination of patent applications, trade secrets, trademarks, copyrights and licenses, together with non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements, to establish and protect proprietary rights to technologies we develop. Should we be unable to adequately protect intellectual property rights or become subject to a claim of infringement, our business may be materially adversely affected. We expect to prepare patent applications in accordance with our worldwide intellectual property strategy on acquiring new technologies. However, we cannot be certain that any patents will be issued with respect to future patents pending or future patent applications. Further, we do not know whether any future patents will be upheld as valid, proven enforceable against alleged infringers or be effective in preventing the development of competitive patents. The Company believes that it has implemented a sophisticated internal intellectual property management system to promote effective identification and protection of its products and know-how in connection with the technologies it develops and may develop in the future.  Environmental laws and other governmental legislation may affect our business.
 26


---



Should the technologies the Company develops not comply with applicable environmental laws or if it is exposed to liability claims, its business and financial results could be seriously harmed. Any imposition of liability that is not covered by insurance or is in excess of insurance coverage could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Furthermore, changes in legislation and government policy could also negatively impact us. We are currently unaware of any introduced or proposed bills, or policy, that may cause any specific changes to our operations. However, no assurance can be given that we will be able to obtain any necessary license required in the future, or that future changes in laws or government policies affecting any technology we develop, or products we market, will not impose additional regulatory requirements on us, intensify competition in the technology industries that we are involved in, or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.  We may face liability claims on our future products.  Although we intend to implement exhaustive testing programs to identify potential material defects in technology we develop, any undetected defects could harm our reputation, diminish our customer base, shrink revenues and expose us to product liability claims.  The market for our stock is limited and our stock price may be volatile. The market for our common stock has been limited due to low trading volume and the small number of brokerage firms acting as market makers. Because of the limitations of our market and volatility of the market price of our stock, investors may face difficulties in selling shares at attractive prices when they want to. The average daily trading volume for our stock has varied significantly from week to week and from month to month, and the trading volume often varies widely from day to day. We incur significant expenses as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which expenses may continue to negatively impact our financial performance.  We incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses as a result of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules implemented by the Commission, which control the corporate governance practices of public companies. Compliance with these laws, rules and regulations, including compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, has substantially increased our expenses, including legal and accounting costs, and made some activities more time-consuming and costly.  Our internal controls over financial reportingmaynot considered effective in the future, whichcouldresult in a loss of investor confidence in our financial reports and in turn have an adverse effect on our stock price. Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 we are required to furnish a report by our management on our internal controls over financial reporting. Such report must contain, among other matters, an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of the end of the year, including a statement as to whether or not our internal controls over financial reporting are effective. This assessment must include disclosure of any material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting identified by management. If we are unable to continue to assert that our internal controls are effective, our shareholders could lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.   The Companys shareholders may face significant restrictions on their stock.
 27


---



The Companys stock differs from many stocks in that it is a penny stock. The Commission has adopted a number of rules to regulate penny stocks including, but not limited to, those rules from the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act) as follows:  3a51-1 which defines penny stock as, generally speaking, those securities which are not listed on either NASDAQ or a national securities exchange and are priced under $5, excluding securities of issuers that have net tangible assets greater than $2 million if they have been in operation at least three years, greater than $5 million if in operation less than three years, or average revenue of at least $6 million for the last three years; 15g-1   which outlines transactions by broker/dealers which are exempt from 15g-2 through 15g-6 as those whose commissions from traders are lower than 5% total commissions; 15g-2   which details that brokers must disclose risks of penny stock on Schedule 15G; 15g-3   which details that broker/dealers must disclose quotes and other information relating to the penny stock market; 15g-4               which explains that compensation of broker/dealers must be disclosed; 15g-5   which explains that compensation of persons associated in connection with penny stock sales must be disclosed; 15g-6               which outlines that broker/dealers must send out monthly account statements; and 15g-9               which defines sales practice requirements.  Since our securities constitute a penny stock within the meaning of the rules, the rules would apply to us and our securities. Because these rules provide regulatory burdens upon broker-dealers, they may affect the ability of shareholders to sell their securities in any market that may develop; the rules themselves may limit the market for penny stocks. Additionally, the market among dealers may not be active. Investors in penny stock often are unable to sell stock back to the dealer that sold them the stock. The mark-ups or commissions charged by the broker-dealers may be greater than any profit a seller may make. Because of large dealer spreads, investors may be unable to sell the stock immediately back to the dealer at the same price the dealer sold the stock to the investor. In some cases, the stock may fall quickly in value. Investors may be unable to reap any profit from any sale of the stock, if they can sell it at all.  Shareholders should be aware that, according to Commission Release No. 34-29093 dated April 17, 1991, the market for penny stocks has suffered from patterns of fraud and abuse. These patterns include:  ·control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; ·manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; ·boiler room practices involving high pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; ·excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differentials and mark-ups by selling broker-dealers; and ·the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the inevitable collapse of those prices with consequent investor losses.
 28


---







ITEM 2.          UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

On March 25, 2011 the board of directors of the Company authorized the issuance of 150,000 shares of its common stock to Polythermics, LLC, pursuant to an Assignment Agreement between the Company, Polythermics, LLC and MesoCoat, which authorization was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuance was an isolated private transaction by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offeree has access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offeree is financially sophisticated.  On March 25, 2011 the board of directors of the Company authorized the issuance of 56,960 shares of its common stock to Polytherm Technologies LLC pursuant to the Employment Agreement, as amended, with John Neukirchen, which authorization was made in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuance was an isolated private transaction by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offeree has access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offeree is financially sophisticated.  On March 16, 2011 the board of directors of the Company authorized the issuance of a convertible promissory note to Sonoro Invest SA in the sum of $1,500,000 at a rate of 5% interest per annum, convertible at the option of the holder into $1.00 units consisting of one common share and one half   warrant to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share for a period of two years from the conversion, authorized in reliance on the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) and Regulation S of the Securities Act.  The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuance was an isolated private transaction by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offeree has access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offeree is financially sophisticated.  Regulation S provides generally that any offer or sale that occurs outside of the United States is exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, provided that certain conditions are met. Regulation S has two safe harbors. One safe harbor applies to offers and sales by issuers, securities professionals involved in the distribution process pursuant to contract, their respective affiliates, and persons acting on behalf of any of the foregoing (the issuer safe harbor), and the other applies to resales by persons other than the issuer, securities professionals involved in the distribution process pursuant to contract, their respective affiliates (except certain officers and directors), and persons acting on behalf of any of the forgoing (the resale safe harbor). An offer, sale or resale of securities that satisfies all conditions of the applicable safe harbor is deemed to be outside the United States as required by Regulation S.  The Company complied with the exemption requirements of Regulation S by having directed no offering efforts in the United States, by offering common shares only to one offeree who was outside the United States at the time of the offering, and ensuring that the offeree to whom the common shares were offereed and authorized was a non-U.S. offeree with an address in a foreign country.  On March 16, 2011 the board of directors of the Company authorized the grant of 150,000 options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock to Paal Syverson, and 20,000 options to purchase shares


of the Companys common stock to David Vander Gulik in reliance on the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.
 29


---



The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the grants were isolated private transactions by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the grantees have access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the grantees are financially sophisticated.  On February 3, 2011 the board of directors of the Company authorized the issuance of 160,000 shares of its common stock and 80,000 warrants to purchase common stock with an exercise price of $1.50 per share for a period of two years from the date of issuance  to Paramount Trading Company, Inc. in exchange for $160,000 or $1.00 per unit pursuant to the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) and Regulation S of the Securities Act.  The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuance was an isolated private transaction by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offeree has access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offeree is financially sophisticated.  The Company complied with the exemption requirements of Regulation S by having directed no offering efforts in the United States, by offering common shares only to offerees who were outside the United States at the time of the offering, and ensuring that the persons to whom the common shares were issued and authorized were non-U.S. persons with addresses in foreign countries.  On January 25, 2011, the board of directors of the Company authorized the grant of 25,000 stock options to Anupam Ghildyal for services rendered, which options have an exercise price of $1.25 per share, expire ten years from the grant date, and will vest in equal one third parts on the anniversary of the grant date, which options were authorized in reliance upon an exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.  The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuance was an isolated private transaction by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offeree has access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offeree is financially sophisticated.  On December 10, 2010 the board of directors of the Company extinguished debt in the amount of $177,000 andrealized a subscription payable of $3,000 foran aggregate of $180,000 in exchange for shares of common stock valued at $0.75 per sharein reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) and Regulation S of the Securities Act.as follows:  Investor
     Net Consideration
     Exemption
     SharesEdward P.  Phelan
     $112,500
     Sec 4(2)
     150,000Kosson Ventures Ltd.
     $67,500
     Reg S/Sec 4(2)
     90,000
    The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuances were isolated private transactions by the Company which did not


involve a public offering; (2) the offerees have access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offerees are financially sophisticated.
 30


---



The Company complied with the exemption requirements of Regulation S by having directed no offering efforts in the United States, by offering common shares only to offerees who were outside the United States at the time of the offering, and ensuring that the persons to whom the common shares were issued and authorized were non-U.S. persons with addresses in foreign countries.  On October 22, 2010 the board of directors of the Company authorized the issuance of 1,600,000 shares of its common stock to Bank Julius Baer & Co.  Ltd. in exchange for $1,245,000 valued at $0.75 per share in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) and Regulation S of the Securities Act.  The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuances were isolated private transactions by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offerees have access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offerees are financially sophisticated.  The Company complied with the exemption requirements of Regulation S by having directed no offering efforts in the United States, by offering common shares only to offerees who were outside the United States at the time of the offering, and ensuring that the persons to whom the common shares were issued and authorized were non-U.S. persons with addresses in foreign countries.  On October 21, 2010 the board of directors of the Company authorized the issuance of 1,100,000 shares of its common stock toCat Brokerage AGin exchange for the extinguishment of debt in the amount of $400,000 andthe realization of  a subscription payable of $425,000 valued at $0.75 per share for an aggregate of $825,000in reliance upon the exemptions from registration provided by Section 4(2) and Regulation S of the Securities Act.  The Companycomplied with the exemption requirements ofSection 4(2) of the Securities Act based on the following factors: (1) the issuances were isolated private transactions by the Company which did not involve a public offering; (2) the offerees have access to the kind of information which registration would disclose; and (3) the offerees are financially sophisticated.  The Company complied with the exemption requirements of Regulation S by having directed no offering efforts in the United States, by offering common shares only to offerees who were outside the United States at the time of the offering, and ensuring that the persons to whom the common shares were issued and authorized were non-U.S. persons with addresses in foreign countries.  ITEM 3.          DEFAULTS ON SENIOR SECURITIES  None.  ITEM 4.          (REMOVED AND RESERVED)  Removed and reserved.
 31


---







ITEM 5.          OTHER INFORMATION



None.  ITEM 6.          EXHIBITS  Exhibits required to be attached by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in theIndex to Exhibitson page 34 of this Form 10‐Q, and are incorporated herein by this reference.
 32


---



SIGNATURES  Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  Abakan Inc.
     Date/s/ Robert H. Miller
By: Robert H. Miller
Its: President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
     April 18, 2011/s/ Costas Takkas
By: Costas Takkas
Its: Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
     April 18, 2011
  
 33


---



INDEX TO EXHIBITS   Exhibit No.      Exhibit Description  3(i)*                       Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form SB-2, filed with the Commission on June 19, 2007. 3(ii)*                      Bylaws of the Company, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form SB-2, filed with the Commission on June 19, 2007. 10(i)*                                     Certificate of Change (Pursuant to NRS 78.209), incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 9, 2008. 10(ii)*                    Articles of Merger (Pursuant to NRS 92A.200), incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 9, 2008. 10(iii)*                   Memorandum of Understanding, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K, filed with the Commission on September 9, 2008. 10(iv)*                   Share Purchase Agreement, incorporated hereto by reference to the Schedule 13-D, filed with the Commission on September 29, 2008. 10(v)*                    Share Purchase Agreement, incorporated hereto by reference to the Schedule 13-D, filed with the Commission on September 29, 2008. 10(vi)*                   Articles of Merger dated November 9, 2009, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 9, 2009. 10(vii)*                  Agreement and Plan of Merger dated November 9, 2009, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 9, 2009. 10(viii)*                 Consulting agreement dated December 1, 2009, between the Company and Mr. Greenbaum, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 28, 2010. 10(ix)*                   Investment Agreement dated December 9, 2009, between the Company, MesoCoat and Powdermet, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on December 17, 2009. 10(x)*                    Agreement dated April 30, 2010 between the Company and Mr. Buschor, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 11, 2010. 10(xi)*                   Stock Purchase Agreement dated June 29, 2010 between the Company and Kennametal, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 15, 2010. 10(xii)*                  Employment agreement dated August 20, 2010, between the Company and Mr. Takkas, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on August 26, 2010. 10(xiii)*                 Amendment No. 1 to Stock Purchase Agreement dated September 7, 2010, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 15, 2010. 10(xiv)*                Amendment to the Investment Agreement dated December 8, 2010, between the Company, MesoCoat and Powdermet, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on January 19, 2011. 10(xv)*Accord and Satisfaction Agreement dated March 21, 2011 between the Company and Kennametal, Inc., incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 25, 2011. 10(xvi)                  
Assignment Agreement dated August 25, 2011 with Polythermics LLC and MesoCoat. 21*                         Subsidiaries of the Company, incorporated hereto by reference to the Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 21, 2010. 31(i)                      
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, attached hereto. 31(ii)                     
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, attached hereto. 32(i)                      
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, attached hereto. 32(ii)                      
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, attached hereto.  *         Incorporated by reference to previous filings of the Company.
 34


---