alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Seymour Holding Corporation, Appellant, vs. Wendt and wife, Respondents.

*December 3, 1945*—

January *8, 1946.*

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Lehner & Lehner, Ado.lph P. Lehner,*and *Howard N. Lehner,*all of Oconto Falls.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Sigman & Sigman*of Appleton, and oral argument by *Abyaham Sigman.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

Upon an examination of the record in this case we are of the opinion that the trial court was clearly right in denying the motion of the plaintiff for summary judgment. The pleadings present questions of fact which *131should only be determined upon the trial of the case. We shall note only one of them.

The plaintiff alleges that it became the owner of the mortgage in question on the 24th day of December, 1934. The defendants allege that T. A. Nickadem, secretary of the plaintiff company, as cashier of the Seymour State Bank, on the 22d day of December, 1934, executed a satisfaction in full and complete settlement of the indebtedness of $4,362, which it held as a creditor of the defendants, which included the $1,000 represented by plaintiff’s mortgage without disclosing that it no longer owned the indebtedness. In the affidavits it is alleged that the mortgages given by the defendants on April 4, 1930, were sold and delivered to the plaintiff on April 21,1934. If that is true, when T. A. Nickadem signed the creditors’ agreement on December 22, 1934, in which he stated that the defendants were indebted to the Seymour State Bank in the sum of $4,362, he knew as secretary of the plaintiff that the Seymour State Bank was not then the owner of that indebtedness. What the facts and legal conclusions are, and the exact relation of the parties, are matters which should be considered upon a trial. We shall not comment further for the reason that any comment made might be misleading, the actual facts not having been fully determined.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2713 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2713

To amend title 23, United States Code, to require States to use Federal 
 highway funds for projects in high priority corridors, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 13, 2000

Mr. Hutchinson introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 23, United States Code, to require States to use Federal 
 highway funds for projects in high priority corridors, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Priority Corridor Equity Act of 
2000''.

SEC. 2. REVENUE ALIGNED BUDGET AUTHORITY.

    Section 110(c) of title 23, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Of the funds'' and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--Of the funds''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Special rule.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Notwithstanding paragraph (1), 
                if, for fiscal year 2000 or any fiscal year thereafter, 
                a State has within its boundaries 1 or more high 
                priority corridors identified in section 1105(c) of the 
                Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 
                1991 (105 Stat. 2032) and the State does not obligate 
                on projects described in section 103(b)(6)(A) an 
                aggregate amount that equals or exceeds the amount 
                described in subparagraph (B), the State may obligate 
                funds allocated to the State under subsection (b)(4) 
                for the following fiscal year only on projects 
                described in section 103(b)(6)(A) in such corridors.
                    ``(B) Amount.--The amount referred to in 
                subparagraph (A) is the lesser of--
                            ``(i) 10 percent of the aggregate amount of 
                        funds apportioned to the State under this 
                        chapter; or
                            ``(ii) the total amount necessary to 
                        complete construction of any incomplete 
                        projects described in section 103(b)(6)(A) in 
                        such corridors.''.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 4, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 443 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-35, K2025-34.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24044 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 19
                                   ----------

        Annual report of Accountants with respect to the servicing of the
     contracts by the Servicer, pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement

                          Independent Auditors' Report


The Board of Directors
The CIT Group, Inc.:

We have examined  management's  assertion about The CIT  Group/Sales  Financing,
Inc.  and  The  CIT  Group/Consumer  Finance,   Inc.'s  (the  Companies),   both
wholly-owned  subsidiaries of The CIT Group,  Inc.,  compliance with the minimum
servicing standards  identified in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's
Uniform Single  Attestation  Program for Mortgage Bankers as of and for the year
ended  December  31, 1998  included in the  accompanying  management  assertion.
Management  is  responsible  for the  Companies'  compliance  with those minimum
servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's
assertion about the Companies' compliance based on our examination.

Our  examination  was  made in  accordance  with  standards  established  by the
American  Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,  accordingly,  included
examining,  on a test basis,  evidence about the Companies'  compliance with the
minimum  servicing   standards  and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we
considered  necessary  in the  circumstances.  We believe  that our  examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.  Our examination does not provide a
legal  determination  on the Companies'  compliance  with the minimum  servicing
standards.

In our opinion,  management's  assertion that the Companies have complied in all
material respects with the aforementioned  minimum servicing standards as of and
for the year ended December 31, 1998 is fairly stated, in all material respects.


                                  /s/ KPMG LLP

March 5, 1999
# L_2011195EN.01003001.xml

| 27.7.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 195/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 195/30

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 732/2011

of 22 July 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Göttinger Feldkieker (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Göttinger Feldkieker’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Germany’s application to register the name ‘Göttinger Feldkieker’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 July 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 309, 13.11.2010, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

GERMANY

Göttinger Feldkieker (PGI)

---
INTHESUPREME COURT OF

### PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF 

### DISCIPLINARYCOUNSEL, : No. 1668 

### DisciplinaryDocket No. 3 

### Petitioner : No.210 DB 2010
v. : 

### Attorney Registration No. 

### 33985 HARRYVINCENT CARDONI, : 

### (LuzerneCounty) Respondent ORDER
PER 

### CURIAM AND NOW, this 13th 

### day of July, 2017, upon 

### consideration of the 

### Recommendation of the 

### Three-Member Panel of the 

### Disciplinary Board, the 

### Joint Petition in 

### Support of 

### Discipline on 

### Consent is 

### granted, and Harry 

### Vincent Cardoni is 

### suspended on 

### consent from the Bar of this 

### Commonwealth for a period of five 

### years, retroactive to 

### December 28, 2010. 

### Respondent shall 

### comply with all 

### provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217 and shall pay the costs incurred by the 

### Disciplinary Board in the 

### investigationand 

### prosecution ofthis matter.
SUBJECT: State briefly the problem on which you desire assistance. us J Lf{lq-1{ 

L..__) J-1-A..r- ~-~---~ I 6-.N' G.n -r-o ./Yl '-l !(_ G- Q v gr_ _b_ (\_,- .JhJ ' -----, 

8 k PLA--rJ ~ d F '7]/f A-li I> LDi.t+f..!t /)f.-tv tA-L '~ 

e_ry;::-- f\1'-/ (A_;~ J /_ () .-;.-- ~C> -n-1-? WdJv...)ll.h_f..A 

A,., - /1,- "/ 

J..H> m o ~ t 1 If /VI 6-J r /~ c ' t;::-U WJ • J 

RECEIVE[) ~~~ 

Pe-,"' G.: 6 &J.J 61.- LJ-1-i sJ 1 

rJ I fit "ffl 3 L i /1) IJi- , ~ wlf fJIJ.ill._ 7Y ~J(~trt.r 

Name: COURT OF CRfMIN~l APPEALS No: Unit: ___________ _ 

Living Quarters: MAY 11 2015 · Work Assignment: ______________ _ 

DISPOSITION: (l~i}~OOS'f'I!CJ~~~ space) 

"frl-60 (Rev. 11-90)
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 21

- 00292

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 360th District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 360

- 696189

- 21

Before Bassel, Womack, and Wallach, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion 

### I N THE 

### I NTEREST OF 

### T.W. AND 

### J.M., C HILDREN2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT
On September 22, 2021, and October 5, 2021, we notified appellant, in

accordance with R ule of A ppellate P rocedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss this
appeal unless appellant paid the $205 filing fee. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c), 44.3.
Appellant ha s not done so. See Tex. R. App. P. 5, 12.1(b).
Because appellant ha s not complied with a procedural requirement and the
Texas Supreme Cou rt’s order of August 28, 2015, 1 we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R.
App. P. 42.3(c), 43.2(f).
Appellant must pay all costs of this appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

Per Curiam

Delivered: October 21, 2021

1 See Supreme Court of Tex., Fees Charged in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the Judicial Panel on Multi

- District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15

- 9158 (Aug. 28, 20 15) (listing c ourts of appeals’ fees).
Exhibit 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yellow Hill Energy Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jay
Jhaveri, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
27th day of February, 2009.


/s/ Jay Jhaveri
--------------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
#### Langworthy, Respondent, vs. Reisinger and another, Appellants.

*May 21*

June *22, 1946.*

For the appellants there was a brief by *McGowan & Geffs*of Janesville, and oral argument by *Jacob Geffs.*

For the respondent there was a brief by Arnold, *Caskey & Robson*of Beloit, and oral argument by *E. J. Caskey.*

Fairchild, J.

This case was tried with, and involved the consideration of questions determined in *Langworthy v.*
      *30
      *Reisinger, ante,*p. 24, 23 N. W. (2d) 482. The conclusions reached in that case control here.

*By the Court.*— Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with directions to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint.
HILL - 2014.6.30 - EX 10.2


Exhibit 10.2


AMENDMENT TO PRODUCT PURCHASE AGREEMENT


This AMENDMENT THREE (3) TO PRODUCT PURCHASE AGREEMENT (the "Amendment") supplements that certain Product Purchase Agreement No. 02542-060507 which has an effective date of September 9, 2007 and which is by and between Hewlett-Packard Company (herein "HP") and Dot Hill Systems (herein "Supplier").


RECITALS


WHEREAS, HP and Supplier have previously entered into the Product Purchase Agreement (the "Agreement ") stated above;


WHEREAS, the purpose of this Amendment is to set forth commercial and other terms and conditions for Product sold by Supplier and purchased by HP pursuant to the Agreement ; and


WHEREAS, HP and Supplier desire to supplement the Agreement as herein provided. 


NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged ,HP and Supplier hereby agree as follows:


		
	1.
	The effective date ("Effective Date") of this Amendment is August 25th, 2008, however, the effective date of the change detailed at paragraph 4 below is effective retroactively to the Effective Date of the Agreement.




		
	2.
	Capitalized terms used herein, unless otherwise defined, will have the meanings given in the Agreement.




		
	3.
	This Amendment may be signed in original or emailed counterparts, and each counterpart will be considered an original, but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.




		
	4.
	Section 1.2 of the Agreement is modified to include the following sentence:




Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, Supplier acknowledges and agrees that all purchases by HP and its Eligible Purchasers from Supplier shall be governed by the terms of this Agreement whether or not set forth in an Exhibit to this Agreement.


		
	5.
	The Agreement continues in full force and effect, and except as may be expressly set forth in this Amendment, the Agreement is unchanged.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties, intending to be legally bound hereby, have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.
	
			
	DOT HILL SYSTEMS CORP.
	 
	HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY

	/s/ Dana W. Kammersgard
	 
	/s/ Richard Gentilini

	Authorized Representative
	 
	Authorized Representative

	8/22/2008
	 
	9/5/2008

	Date
	 
	Date

	Dana W. Kammersgard
	 
	Richard Gentilini

	Printed Name
	 
	Printed Name

	CEO
	 
	Director, SWD Global Procurement

	Title
	 
	Title
EXHIBIT 99.9
                                                                    ------------

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Harold E. Miller, Jr. certify that:

     1.   I  am  the  senior  officer  of  Franklin  Capital   Corporation  (the
          "Servicer") in charge of servicing;

     2.   I have reviewed  this annual  report on Form 10-K,  and all reports on
          Form  8-K  containing  distribution  and  servicing  reports  filed in
          respect of periods  included in the year covered by this annual report
          of Franklin  Receivables  LLC, in each case  relating to the following
          entities (the "Trusts"):

               * Franklin Auto Trust 2000-1

               * Franklin Auto Trust 2001-1

               * Franklin Auto Trust 2001-2

               * Franklin Auto Trust 2002-1

     3.   Based on my knowledge,  the  information in these reports,  taken as a
          whole,  does not contain any untrue  statement  of a material  fact or
          omit to state a material fact necessary to make the  statements  made,
          in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made,
          not misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
          report;

     4.   Based on my knowledge,  the distribution information and the servicing
          information  required to be provided to the  Indenture  Trustee by the
          Servicer under the Sale and Servicing  Agreements is included in these
          reports;

     5.   I am  responsible  for  reviewing  the  activities  performed  by  the
          Servicer  under the Sale and  Servicing  Agreements  and based upon my
          knowledge and the annual compliance review required under the Sale and
          Servicing Agreements, except as disclosed in the reports, the Servicer
          has fulfilled its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreements;
          and

     6.   The reports  disclose  all  significant  deficiencies  relating to the
          Servicer's  compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
          the  report  provided  by  an  independent  public  accountant,  after
          conducting  a review in  compliance  with the standard as set forth in
          the Sale and Servicing Agreements that is included in these reports.

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings ascribed to them
in the Sale and  Servicing  Agreements,  dated  January 1, 2000,  March 1, 2001,
December  1,  2001 and June 1,  2002  (the  "Sale  and  Servicing  Agreements"),
respectively,  among Franklin  Receivables LLC,  Franklin  Resources,  Inc., the
Servicer and the Trusts.


                                   /s/ Harold E. Miller, Jr.
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                   HAROLD E. MILLER, JR.
                                   President & Chief Executive Officer
                                   (Chief Servicing Officer)
SteelBook Shop LLC 

2703 Cassidy Ct 

Winchester, VA 22601-2685 

To whom it may Concern, 

SteelBook Shop LLC, a registered Virginia LLC, solely owned by Jeremy Berkebile, US Citizen by 

birth, would request special exemption from certain FAA Regulations, Section 333 exemption, 

regarding the use of a Phantom 3 Vision unmanned aircraft. I have read, reviewed and fully 

understand the guidelines for safe flight. landing, takeoff and preflight checklist.

The purpose of my drone use, would be for aerial photography services for real estate, home inspection, 

property monitoring for agriculture. The photographs would be taken with permission of the 

landowner. The use of the UAS can provide a more comprehensive look and impressive detail of the 

surveyed landscape. 

The following conditions will be met at all times: 

 provided the aircraft weighs less than 55 pounds, 

 operations are conducted during daytime Visual Flight Rules (VFR) 

 conditions and within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the pilots 

 certain distances away from airports or heliports.(Winchester Regional Airport has no tower) 

as well as additional guidelines and restrictions and outlined on the FAA website. 

. 

Jeremy Berkebile 

540-931-7799