alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-41594

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MAURO BRITO-RIVERA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 7:15-CR-846-1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Mauro Brito-Rivera raises an 

argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez, 711 F.3d 541, 562 

(5th Cir. 2013) (en banc), in which we held that the generic, contemporary 

definition of sexual abuse of a minor does not require the age of consent to be 

below 17 years old. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is 

GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 21, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-41594 Document: 00513557445 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
EXHIBIT 35.1

VW Credit, Inc. Servicer Compliance Statement Under Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing

Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB





VOLKSWAGEN AUTO
LOAN ENHANCED TRUST 2012-2





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of VW Credit, Inc. (VCI), as Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of
October 11, 2012 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the Sale and Servicing Agreement), by and among Volkswagen Auto Loan Enhanced Trust 2012-2, as Issuer, Volkswagen Auto Lease/Loan
Underwritten Funding, LLC as Seller, VW Credit, Inc., as Servicer, and Citibank, N.A., as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this twenty-seventh day of March, 2015.



/s/ Horst MeimaHorst MeimaExecutive Vice President & CFO
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24025]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 437 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-24, K2025-23.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24025 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83927]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24078]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 11, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 471 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-74, K2025-72.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24078 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# L_2014019DE.01000801.xml

| 22.1.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 19/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 19/8

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 931/2011 der Kommission vom 19. September 2011 über die mit der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 178/2002 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates festgelegten Rückverfolgbarkeitsanforderungen an Lebensmittel tierischen Ursprungs

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 242 vom 20. September 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 242 vom 20. September 2011

Auf Seite 3, in Artikel 3 Absatz 1 Buchstabe g:

anstatt:

„eine Bezugsnummer zur Identifizierung der Partie, der Charge bzw. der Sendung sowie“

muss es heißen:

„eine Referenz zur Identifizierung der Partie, der Charge oder der Sendung, je nach Fall, sowie“;

auf Seite 3, in Artikel 3 Absatz 3 Unterabsatz 1:

anstatt:

„Die in Absatz 1 aufgeführten Informationen werden täglich aktualisiert und mindestens so lange zur Verfügung gehalten, bis davon ausgegangen werden kann, dass das Lebensmittel verzehrt wurde.“

muss es heißen:

„Die in Absatz 1 aufgeführten Informationen werden täglich aktualisiert und mindestens so lange zur Verfügung gehalten, bis vernünftigerweise davon ausgegangen werden kann, dass das Lebensmittel verzehrt wurde.“

---
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skreem Entertainment Corp. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles Camorata, Principal Executive Officer, certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: August 20, 2008



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ Charles Camorata       
| | Charles Camorata           
| | Principal Executive Officer



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
2014 FEDERAL BENEFITS
 

OPEN SEASON
 

Monday Nov. 10 through Monday Dec. 8 

FEHB Health 

• Enroll 

• Change plan/option 

• Self/Self & Family 

• Cancel enrollment 

FEDVIP Dental & Vision 

• Enroll 

• Change plan/option 

• Self/Self + One/Self & Family 

• Cancel enrollment 

Flexible Spending Accounts 

• Enroll 

• Reenroll (it’s not automatic!) 

• Increase/decrease 

 your election 

Things to Consider: 

• My family’s health, dental, and vision needs for 2015 

• Whether my current plan will be available in 2015 

-If I do nothing, FEHB and FEDVIP enrollments rollover automatically 

• How my current plan’s benefits and premiums change in 2015 

• Whether the online comparison tools show a better plan for me 

• How much money I could save with a flexible spending account 

MORE INFO: www.opm.gov/openseason 

ENROLL/CHANGE/CANCEL:

FEHB HEALTH: Use your agency's online enrollment system or contact your human resources office. 

FEDVIP DENTAL AND/OR VISION: www.BENEFEDS.com or 1-877-888-3337 

FSAFEDS FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT: www.FSAFEDS.com or 1-877-372-3337 

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
 
2014 FEDERAL BENEFITS
 

OPEN SEASON
 

Monday Nov. 10 through Monday Dec. 8 

FEHB Health 

• Enroll 

• Change plan/option 

• Self/Self & Family 

• Cancel enrollment 

Flexible Spending Accounts 

• Enroll 

• Reenroll (it’s not automatic!) 

• Increase/decrease 

 your election 

FEDVIP Dental & Vision 

• Enroll 

• Change plan/option 

• Self/Self + One/Self & Family 

• Cancel enrollment 

Things to Consider: 

• My family’s health, dental, and vision needs for 2015 

• Whether my current plan will be available in 2015 

-If I do nothing, FEHB and FEDVIP enrollments rollover automatically 

• How my current plan’s benefits and premiums change in 2015 

• Whether the online comparison tools show a better plan for me 

• How much money I could save with a flexible spending account 

MORE INFO: www.opm.gov/openseason
 

ENROLL/CHANGE/CANCEL:
 

FFEHB HEALTH: Use your agency's online enrollment system or contact your human resources office.
 

FEDVIP DENTAL AND/OR VISION: www.BENEFEDS.com or 1-877-888-3337
 

FSAFEDS FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT: www.FSAFEDS.com or 1-877-372-3337
 

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80613]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22749]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 3, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 404 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-765, K2024-58.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22749 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### AMERICAN NAT. LIFE INS. CO. v. JOHN R. CORLEY CO, Inc.

No. 1506.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

June 7, 1934.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1934.

J. E. & B. L. Bradley, of Groesbeck, for plaintiff in error.

O. F. Watkins, of Mexia, for defendant in error.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

The life insurance policy recovered on in. the trial court contained the following provision: “Provided, however, that no obligation is assumed by the company prior to the-date hereof nor unless on said date the insured is alive and in sound health.” The trial court found that at the time the policy was-issued the insured had a malignant condition of the abdomen and was not in sound health, but that neither the insured nor the beneficiary named in the policy knew or thought that such condition existed. The evidence-supports such findings, and further establishes that within two months after the issuance-of the policy the insured died from the effects of the disease which he had at the time-the policy was issued and delivered.

The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the assignee of the beneficiary named in-the policy because of the finding that the insured believed that he was in sound health at the time the policy was delivered. Such finding, however, did not justify a recovery-on the policy sued on. It is now well settled, in this state that a stipulation in a life insurance policy that such policy shall not take-effect unless the insured is in sound health at the date the policy is delivered is, unless restrained by some statute, valid-and enforceable, and it is immaterial whether the insured knew of his condition in that respect or not. His good faith in believing that he was in sound health at the time the policy was delivered will not authorize a recovery if in fact at the time of the delivery of the policy he was suffering from an ailment of a substantial nature which continued and ultimately caused his death. 24 Tex. Jur. 691; Wright v. Federal Life Insurance Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 248 S. W. 325; Southern Surety Co. v. Benton (Tex. Com. App.) 280 S. W. 551; American National Ins. Co. v. Melton (Tex. Civ. App.) 29 S.W.(2d) 795; American Nat. Ins. Co. v. Jarrell (Tex. Civ. App.) 50 S.W. (2d) 875; Ofield v. National Ben. Life Ins. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 293 S. W. 271; Denton, v. Kansas City Life Ins. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 231 S. W. 436.

Since the trial court found that the insured was not in sound health at the time the policy was issued, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover herein. The judgment of the trial court is therefore reversed, and judgment here rendered that the plaintiff take nothing.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2828

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require that the Secretary

of Health and Human Services wage adjust the actual, rather than

the estimated, proportion of a hospital’s costs that are attributable to

wages and wage-related costs.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mr. GRASSLEY (for himself, Mr. CONRAD, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr.

THOMAS, and Mr. COCHRAN) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to require

that the Secretary of Health and Human Services wage

adjust the actual, rather than the estimated, proportion

of a hospital’s costs that are attributable to wages and

wage-related costs.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Geographic Adjust5 ment Fairness Act of 2000’’.
2

•S 2828 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT THAT THE ACTUAL PROPORTION OF

2 A HOSPITAL’S COSTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO

3 WAGES AND WAGE-RELATED COSTS BE WAGE

4 ADJUSTED.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

6 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

7 1395ww(d)(3)(E)) is amended by striking ‘‘, (as estimated

8 by the Secretary from time to time) of hospitals’ costs’’

9 and inserting ‘‘of each hospital’s costs (based on the most

10 recent data available to the Secretary with respect to the

11 hospital)’’.

12 (b) SPECIAL RULE FOR HOSPITALS LOCATED IN

13 PUERTO RICO.—Section 1886(d)(3)(E) of the Social Se14 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(d)(3)(E)) is amended by

15 adding at the end the following new sentence: ‘‘In the case

16 of a hospital located in Puerto Rico, the first sentence of

17 this subparagraph shall be applied as in effect on the day

18 before the date of enactment of the Geographic Adjust19 ment Fairness Act of 2000.’’.

20 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

21 this section shall apply with respect to discharges occur22 ring on or after January 1, 2001.

Æ
#### BARTON v. TOKIO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DIST. et al.

No. 3554.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

May 4, 1932.

T. Wade Potter, of Littlefield, for appellant.

R. L. Graves, of Brownfield, for appelleds.

HALL, O. J.

This suit is based upon a contract made between G. S. Glenn and the appellee school district. Appellant, Barton, alleges that for a valuable consideration the said Glenn assigned to him the written contract which forms the basis of this suit.' It appears that Glenn is an architect, and that he entered into a contract with the board of trustees for said school district on the 20th day of August, 1929, to furnish all necessary sketches; *940plans, blueprints, and specifications for tbe erection and completion of a school building at a site to be selected by tbe school trustees, and also agreed to superintend tbe building until its completion and to assist in getting tbe best and cheapest bid for tbe erection of tbe building. In consideration of bis services, tbe trustees of tbe district agreed to pay him 5 per cent, in two installments of 3 per cent, and 2 per cent, respectively.

Tbe appellant prayed in the alternative for judgment upon a quantum meruit.

It is undisputed that tbe contract with Glenn was made before tbe election for tbe issuance of bonds bad been held, and at a time when there was no money in tbe treasury for tbe purpose of constructing a school building, and tbe first amended petition upon which tbe case was tried fails to allege that tbe defendant district had available moneys from any source out of which bis demand, if established, could be paid. Tbe election at which tbe district voted upon the proposed bond issue was not held until September 22, 1929, and it is not shown that there was any money available for building purposes in that district. Tbe trustees did not use tbe plans and specifications submitted by Glenn, nor is it shown that they accepted or adopted tbe plans and specifications at any time.

In view of tbe recent decision of the Commission of Appeals in tbe ease of Harlingen Independent School District v. C. H. Page & Bro., 48 S.W.(2d) 983, it becomes our duty to affirm the judgment of tbe trial court. Tbe Page Case, as decided by tbe San Antonio 'Court of Civil Appeals, is reported in 23 S.W. '(2d) 829, and involves tbe main question presented in tbe instant case. In view of tbe decision by tbe Commission of Appeals in that case which decides tbe questions before us ••adversely to tbe appellant’s contention, it is unnecessary for us to discuss at length the •contentions in this case.

Upon tbe authority of tbe Page Case, we. affirm tbe judgment.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TechniScan, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Steven K. Passey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



/s/ STEVEN K. PASSEY Steven K. Passey Chief Financial OfficerDate: November 22, 2010


---



QuickLinks
IRF-2014.6.29-EX10.3






EXHIBIT 10.3




August 14, 2014


Adam White


Dear Adam:


Reference is made to the letter (“Position Letter”) dated July 22, 2011, setting out your position of Senior Vice President, Global Sales for International Rectifier Corporation (“Company”). 


The purpose of this letter is to supplement the terms of the Position Letter to memorialize an increase in base salary and elimination of car allowance effective as of the commencement of the Company’s 2015 fiscal year (“Effective Date”), as follows:


		
	1.
	Effective as of the Effective Date, your annual salary is increased from $338,400 per year to $345,400 per year; and




		
	2.
	Effective as of the Effective Date, all references in the Position Letter to “Car Allowance” are hereby deleted and there shall be no further benefits thereunder.




Except as modified hereby, the Position Letter remains unmodified.


Please indicate your agreement with the foregoing by signing where indicated below.


Regards,


INTERNATIONAL RECTIFIER CORPORATION 




/s/ Lawrence Michlovich
By:  Lawrence Michlovich
Its:  Assistant Secretary




Acknowledged and agreed:




/s/ Adam White                
Adam White
Date:  8/14/2014
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-40119 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE CUAHUTEMOC RICO-MANDUJANO Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:07-CR-607-ALL Before DAVIS, WIENER, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Cuahutemoc Rico-Mandujano has moved for l eave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Rico-Mandujano has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave towithdrawis GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D December 10, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3023

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect breastfeeding by new

mothers.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 11, 2000

Ms. SNOWE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

A BILL

To amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to protect

breastfeeding by new mothers.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pregnancy Discrimina5 tion Act Amendments of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO TITLE VII OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS

7 ACT OF 1964.

8 Section 701(k) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42

9 U.S.C. 2000e(k)) is amended—
2

•S 3023 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘breastfeeding,’’ after ‘‘child2 birth,’’ each place it appears; and

3 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘In this

4 subsection, the term ‘breastfeeding’ means the feed5 ing of a child directly from the breast or the expres6 sion of milk from the breast by a lactating woman.’’.

Æ