alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Albert J. Carney, administrator, *vs.*John H. Casey. Same *vs.*J. J. Crimmings Company. John T. Carney *vs.*John H. Casey. Same vs. J. J. Crimmings Company.

Norfolk.

December *5.*1938.

December 30, 1938.

Present: Field, C.J., Lummus, Qua, Dolan, & Honan, JJ.

Negligence, Motor vehicle, In use of way.

Evidence respecting a collision of an automobile of the plaintiff zigzagging from one side of the road to the other with the defendant’s automobile at its extreme right side of the road would not have warranted a finding that the defendant was negligent.

Four actions of tort. Writs in the Superior Court, the first two dated September 27, 1934, and the last two dated June 13, 1935.

The first and third actions were against the operator of an automobile, owned by the defendant in the second and fourth actions, which collided with an automobile owned by the plaintiff in the third and fourth actions and operated by James E. Carney, intestate of the plaintiff in the first and second actions, as a result of which James E. Carney died.

A verdict was ordered for the defendant in each action by *Donahue,*J. The plaintiffs alleged exceptions.

*W. A. Murray,*for the plaintiffs.

*E. R. Langenbach,*for the defendants.

Honan, J.

A collision between two automobiles occurred about two-thirty o’clock on a rainy afternoon in June, 1934, upon a straight stretch of a macadam highway, *74twenty-two feet in width and having gravel shoulders on each side of the macadam. The defendant Casey (hereinafter referred to as the defendant), who was the only eye witness to the accident, testified that he was driving northerly on the easterly side of the highway when he saw an automobile, operated by the decedent, approaching from the north and proceeding from one side of the road to the other; that the defendant stopped his automobile with its right wheels over the shoulder on the easterly side of the road; and that the decedent drove the rear left of his automobile against the forward left wheel of the defendant’s automobile. Photographs of the two vehicles were introduced in evidence, together with testimony concerning three marks on the highway. There is nothing in the defendant’s testimony (even if an expert would testify that the damage indicated that his vehicle was moving at the time of the accident), in the photographs or in the location of the marks, whether considered separately or together, that would warrant a jury in finding that the accident was caused by the negligence of the defendant. The judge was right in directing verdicts, for the defendants. *Jabbour*v. *Central Construction Co.*238 Mass. 453. *Nager*v. *Reid,*240 Mass. 211. *Boyd*v. *Mills, 278*Mass. 132.

*Exceptions overruled.*
Exhibit 99.13














CONSENT OF GEOLOGIST











Ladies
and Gentlemen:








The
undersigned hereby consents to (1) the references to the
undersigned’s name included or incorporated by reference in
the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection
with the report entitled “Mineral Resource Estimate On The J
Zone Uranium Deposit, Waterbury Lake Property” dated
September 6, 2013 and (2) all other references to the undersigned
included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on Form
40-F of Denison Mines Corp.











Dated:
March 28, 2018








(Signed) “Allan Armitage”


___________________________


Allan
Armitage, Ph.D., P.Geo.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Asia Petroleum, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen
F. Groth, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Stephen F.
Groth


Stephen
F. Groth


Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer


August 6,
2009
|   |  (1) |   |  The                Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September                30, 2007 (the “Form 10-QSB”)fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities                Exchange                Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   |  (2) |   |  The                information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all                material                respects, the financial conditionand                results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                                         |                                                                                                                      |                                   |
|----------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                         |  **VALLEY                FORGE COMPOSITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.**(Registrant)                                            |
|                                         |                                                                                                                      |                                   |
|  Dated:                October 17, 2007 |  By:                                                                                                                 |  /s/                Luz M. Weigel |
|                                         | Luz                M. Weigel                                                                                              |
|                                         | President,                Secretary, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer)(Principal                Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT 31.1 Certification of 
Principal Executive Officer CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Toni A. Eldred, President and Chief Executive Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc., a Florida corporation (the "Company"), certify that: 1.    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company; 2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.     The Companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Company and have: a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and c)     Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter (the Companys fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5.    The Companys other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the audit committee of the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)     All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. Date: September 15, 2009 /s/ Toni A. EldredToni A. Eldred
Principal Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.4


 


Management Consulting
and Technology Service Instruction Letter


 


To
: Khorgos Farmmi Enterprise Service Co., Ltd


 


Copy
to : Hangzhou Nongyuan Network Technology Co.,
Ltd


 


Subject
: Provide management consulting and technology service 


 


According to the Exclusive
Management Consulting and Technology Service Agreement made in September 2016 between our company and Hangzhou Nongyuan Network
Technology Co., Ltd (“Nongyuan”), we now designate your company to provide Nongyuan with management consulting, technical
support, intellectual property licensing and other relevant services as follows:


 


1.       Your
company shall provide partial management consulting, technical support, intellectual property licensing and other relevant services
as stated in the Exclusive Management Consulting and Technology Service Agreement, while our company can still provide relevant
services in accordance with the Management Consulting and Technology Service Agreement. 


 


2.       Within
two months after each fiscal year, our company will set the service proportion on the basis of quantity and complexity of services
provided by your company and our company to Nongyuan in the last fiscal year, inform Nongyuan of the set proportion and ask Nongyuan
to pay corresponding service fee to your company and our company within three months after each fiscal year. Total service fee
will be set according to the Exclusive Management Consulting and Technology Service Agreement. 


 


3.       Unless
otherwise informed by our company’s written notice, the validity of this instruction letter is twenty years.


 


4.       This
instruction letter comes into effect from the date of sealing.


 


Hangzhou Suyuan Agricultural
Technology Co., Ltd


October 20th, 2017




     


     


    

 


Receipt


 


To: Hangzhou Suyuan Agricultural Technology
Co., Ltd,


 


This is Khorgos Farmmi Enterprise
Service Co., Ltd. The Management Consulting and Technology Service Instruction Letter from your company has been received.


 


Khorgos Farmmi Enterprise
Service Co., Ltd.


October 20th, 2017




     


     


    

 


Receipt


 


To: Hangzhou Suyuan Agricultural Technology
Co., Ltd,


 


This is Hangzhou Nongyuan
Network Technology Co., Ltd. The Management Consulting and Technology Service Instruction Letter from your company has been
received.


 


Hangzhou Nongyuan Network
Technology Co., Ltd.


October 20th,
2017
REPORT
ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE 
COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA
 For
the calendar year ending December 31, 2012, National Tax Search, LLC
has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(the "Servicer").
 
 National
Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of
December 31, 2012 and for 
the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") with the servicing 
criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of
Federal Regulations (the "CFR"). NTS has 
used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to
assess compliance with the applicable 
servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122
(d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 
1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the
"Applicable Servicing Criteria") are 
applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the
transactions covered by this report. NTS has 
determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122
(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not 
applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the
transactions covered by this report. The transactions 
covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of the
Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the 
"Platform Transactions").
 NTS,
as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period 
and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects,
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as 
of December 31, 2012 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform Transactions taken as a whole.
 Plante
& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has issued an attestation report on the 
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of
December 31, 2012 and for the Reporting 
Period as set forth in this assertion.
 National
Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer
 /s/
Lori D. Eshoo
 Lori
D. Eshoo, President/CEO
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

 

In connection with this quarterly report of ML Transtrend DTP Enhanced FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri, Chief Executive Officer and President of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. This Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

Date: May 13, 2011

 
| By:    | /s/ JUSTIN C. FERRI                              |   |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|
|   | Justin   C. Ferri                                |   |   |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer, President and Manager |   |   |
|   | (Principal   Executive Officer)                  |   |   |

 

----
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

133091 & (69) (74) Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 133091 

 COA: 263153 

Kent CC: 04-004423-FH 

LOUIS ANTHONY WILBON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

immediate consideration and the motion to remand are DENIED. 

s0618 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

June 26, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, theundersigned officer of Pacific Asia Petroleum, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certifies that, to hisknowledge:     (i) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal quarter endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and     (ii) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  November 9, 2007 By:  /s/ Stephen F. Groth    Stephen F. Groth    Chief Financial Officer
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN THE MATTER OF: Docket No. FAA-2015-3320 

"1 

~; I 

t\PR 2 6 2016 

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC .. FAA Case No. 2012S0700374 

Respondent Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COMPLAINT 

Pursuant to the provisions of 14 C.F.R. § 13.215, the Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), by counsel, herel • withdraws its Complaint dated March 9, 2016. 

Respectfully submitted this 21st day of A, il, 2016. 

JWAN M. LANDERS 

Attorney 

Southern Team 

Enforcement Division (AGC-300) 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that the foregoing has been mailed this date by Certified Mail to: 

Federal Aviation Administration (original+ 1 copy in each case) 

600 Independence A venue, SW 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl000 

Administrative Law Judge J. E. Sullivan 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

Meaghan Goodwin Boyd 

meaghan. boyd@alston.com 

Alston & Bird LLP 

1201 W. Peachtree Street 

Atlanta, Georgia 30309-3424 

FROST BROWN TODD LLC 

Winston E. Miller 

wmiller@fhtlaw.com 

Miles R. Harrison 

mharrison@fhlaw.com 

400 W. Market Street, 32nd Fl. 

Louisville, KY 40202 

Paul Alp 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington DC 20004-2595 

Dated 

2
#### Johnny James YOUNG v. STATE.

No. 20453.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1939.

J. V. Frnka, of Columbus, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for theft of turkeys; punishment, two years confinement in the penitentiary.

Since his appeal was perfected the appellant has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking for the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted, and the appeal is ordered dismissed.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 20, 2015

NO. 03-14-00372-CV

Elizabeth A. White, Appellant

v.

Clean Slate Service, Inc. d/b/a Servpro of North Austin, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 261ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON, AND BOURLAND

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on June 5, 2014. Having reviewed the 

record, it appears that the Court lacks jurisdiction over the appeal. Therefore, the Court 

dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay 

costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
#                                                     Emmanuel V  Abela                                            

### 

## Contact

abelaev@ornl.gov
II

Calendar No. 853

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2951

[Report No. 106–431]

To authorize the Commissioner of Reclamation to conduct a study to investigate opportunities to better manage the water resources in the Salmon

Creek watershed of the upper Columbia River.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. GORTON (for himself and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, with amendments and an amendment to the

title

[Omit the part struck through and insert the part printed in italic]

A BILL

To authorize the Commissioner of Reclamation to conduct

a study to investigate opportunities to better manage

the water resources in the Salmon Creek watershed of

the upper Columbia River.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2951 RS

1 SECTION 1. SALMON CREEK WATERSHED, WASHINGTON,

2 WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Reclama4 tion The Secretary of the Interior may conduct a study to

5 investigate the opportunities to better manage the water

6 resources in the Salmon Creek Watershed, a tributary to

7 the Upper Columbia River system, Okanagoan County,

8 Washington, so as to restore and enhance fishery re9 sources (especially the endangered Upper Columbia

10 Spring Chinook and Steelhead), while maintaining or im11 proving the availability of water supplies for irrigation

12 practices vital to the economic well-being of the county.

13 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the study under sub14 section (a) shall be to derive the benefits of and further

15 the objectives of the comprehensive, independent study

16 commissioned by the Confederated Tribes of the Colville

17 Reservation and the Okanagoan Irrigation District, which

18 provides a credible basis for pursuing a course of action

19 to simultaneously achieve fish restoration and improved ir20 rigation conservation and efficiency.

21 (c) COST SHARE.—The Federal government’s cost

22 share for the feasibility study shall not exceed 50 percent.

Amend the title to read as follows: ‘‘To authorize the

Secretary of the Interior to conduct a study to investigate

opportunties to better manage the water resources in the

Salmon Creek watershed of the upper Columbia River.’’.

Calendar No. 853

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2951

[Report No. 106–431]

A BILL

To authorize the Commissioner of Reclamation to

conduct a study to investigate opportunities tobetter manage the water resources in the SalmonCreek watershed of the upper Columbia River.

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported with amendments and an amendment to the

title
No. 1368, Misc.

Petitioner *pro se. Duke W. Dunbar,*Attorney General of Colorado, *.Frank E. Hickey,*Deputy Attorney General, and *John E. Bush,*Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

#### Trujillo *v.*Colorado.

Supreme Court of Colorado. Certiorari denied.