alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 298 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 298

  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et 
   seq.) to clarify that donations of hard and soft money by foreign 
                       nationals are prohibited.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 22, 1999

  Mr. Shelby introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
         referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 431 et 
   seq.) to clarify that donations of hard and soft money by foreign 
                       nationals are prohibited.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITION OF DONATIONS BY FOREIGN NATIONALS.

    Section 319 of the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 (2 U.S.C. 
441e) is amended--
            (1) by striking the heading and inserting the following: 
        ``contributions and donations by foreign nationals'';
            (2) by striking subsection (a) and inserting the following:
    ``(a) It shall be unlawful for--
            ``(1) a foreign national, directly or through any other 
        person, to make--
                    ``(A) a contribution of money or other thing of 
                value, or to promise expressly or impliedly to make any 
                such contribution, in connection with an election to 
                any political office or in connection with any primary 
                election, convention, or caucus held to select 
                candidates for any political office; or
                    ``(B) a donation; or
            ``(2) any person to solicit, accept, or receive such 
        contribution or donation from a foreign national.''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) As used in this section, the term `donation' means a gift, 
subscription, loan, advance, or deposit of money or anything else of 
value made by any person to a national committee of a political party 
or a Senatorial or Congressional Campaign Committee of a national 
political party for any purpose, but does not include a contribution 
(as defined in section 301(8)).''.
                                 <all>
```
Lori DeGayner

540 West Olin Ave., Apt . 228 Madison, WI 53715 April 7, 2010 Environmental Protection Administrator Lisa Jackson EPA Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W . Washington, DC 20460 Dear Ms. Jackson: 

# RECE

# 11 -0_ 1010APR 14 PM 3

; 1Q 

## OFFIC` OF TME EXECUTIVE SECRETARAT

Thank you for proposing new, more protective standards concerning smog. Apparently there is a primary (60 parts per billion) and a secondary (1 parts per million-hours) standard recommended. Please set the primary and secondary standards at those levels. Although I do have asthma and have trouble breathing on days when there is an air quality alert in my city, and even though I do care about the economic viability of vacation places in our country, I ammost concerned about the endangered health status of our beautiful planet, including her atmosphere . 

### e'-' o'tx Lori DeGayner=~.

. . a . f".,
EXHIBIT 32




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Duane Street Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), the undersigned, Peretz Yehudah Aisenstark, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to our knowledge:




1.
The report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except for the audit of our financial statements by our independent registered public accounting firm; and2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.






Dated: August 27, 2013





/s/ Peretz Yehudah AisenstarkPeretz Yehudah AisenstarkChief Executive and Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference to any filing of Duane Street Corp. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2977

AN ACT

To assist in the establishment of an interpretive center and

museum in the vicinity of the Diamond Valley Lake

in southern California to ensure the protection and interpretation of the paleontology discoveries made at the

lake and to develop a trail system for the lake for use

by pedestrians and nonmotorized vehicles.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2977 ES

1 SECTION 1. INTERPRETIVE CENTER AND MUSEUM, DIA2 MOND VALLEY LAKE, HEMET, CALIFORNIA.

3 (a) ASSISTANT FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF CENTER

4 AND MUSEUM.—The Secretary of the Interior shall enter

5 into an agreement with an appropriate entity for the pur6 pose of sharing costs incurred to design, construct, fur7 nish, and operate an interpretive center and museum, to

8 be located on lands under the jurisdiction of the Metropoli9 tan Water District of Southern California, intended to

10 preserve, display, and interpret the paleontology discov11 eries made at and in the vicinity of the Diamond Valley

12 Lake, near Hemet, California, and to promote other his13 torical and cultural resources of the area.

14 (b) ASSISTANCE FOR NONMOTORIZED TRAILS.—The

15 Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the State of

16 California, a political subdivision of the State, or a com17 bination of State and local public agencies for the purpose

18 of sharing costs incurred to design, construct, and main19 tain a system of trails around the perimeter of the Dia20 mond Valley Lake for use by pedestrians and non-motor21 ized vehicles.

22 (c) MATCHING REQUIREMENT.—The Secretary shall

23 require the other parties to an agreement under this sec24 tion to secure an amount of funds from non-Federal

25 sources that is at least equal to the amount provided by

26 the Secretary.
3

S 2977 ES

1 (d) TIME FOR AGREEMENT.—The Secretary shall

2 enter into the agreements required by this section not

3 later than 180 days after the date on which funds are first

4 made available to carry out this section.

5 (e) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There is

6 authorized to be appropriated not more than $14,000,000

7 to carry out this section.

Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 22), 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2977

AN ACT

To assist in the establishment of an interpretive

center and museum in the vicinity of the Diamond Valley Lake in southern California to ensure the protection and interpretation of the paleontology discoveries made at the lake and to develop a trail system for the lake for use by pedestrians and nonmotorized vehicles.
#### Rottman and wife, Respondents, vs. Bluebird Bakery, Inc., Appellant.

*February 4*

February *28, 1958.*

*311For the appellant the cause was submitted on the brief of *Ervin A. Weinke*of Fond du Lac.

For the respondents there was a brief by *Worthing & Calhoun*of Fond du Lac, and oral argument by *J. W. Calhoun.*

Fairchild, J.

Two question are involved: (1) Did the acceptance of rent amount to an election by plaintiffs to consider defendant a tenant from year to year? (2) Was there a valid agreement that defendant should have six months in which to move in the event of sale? If either be answered in the affirmative, the tenancy was not terminated and the judgment must be reversed.

(1) *Holding over and acceptance of rent.*Sec. 234.07, Stats., provides: “If a tenant for a year or more shall hold over after the expiration of his term he may, at the election of his landlord, be considered a tenant from year to year upon the terms of the original lease.” Holding over and payment and acceptance of rent raise a rebuttable presumption that the landlord has elected to consider the tenancy from year to year. *Hog v. Johnson*(1932), 209 Wis. 581, 583, 245 N. W. 650. The presumption may be rebutted by proof of an express agreement for a month-to-month tenancy as in *Hog v. Johnson*or by other circumstances. The fact that when the landlord accepted the rent the parties were negotiating for a new lease or a sale to the tenant tends to rebut it. See 51 C. J. S., Landlord and Tenant, p. 738, sec. 136. Here there was some discussion of a new lease, some consideration of sale to defendant, and discussion, at least, as to the speed with which defendant would be forced to move if the property were sold to another. Mr. Varhola conceded that he knew the property was for sale and considered that a *312sale would put him in a “spot.” The evidence presented a question of fact as to whether there was an election by plaintiffs to hold defendant from year to year. It is apparent from the decision filed that the court found that no such election had been made and there is evidence to support the finding.

(2) *The “six months” conversation.*The municipal court made no finding as to whether Rottman promised that plaintiffs would give defendant six months to remove in the event of sale, or whether Rottman merely estimated that defendant could delay removal for six months if defendant forced plaintiffs to take the matter to court. Varhola made no claim that defendant gave up its right to terminate at the end of any month by giving thirty days’ notice nor that plaintiffs gave up their corresponding right if they desired to terminate for any reason except sale of the property. Defendant gave up nothing. It was already in the premises and it was to its advantage to stay. Probably Varhola thought he could stay in the premises as long as he cared to unless it was sold and then he would have six months in which to remove. Under the circumstances we are of the opinion that defendant has not sufficiently met its burden of proof to establish a contractual modification of the statutory method of terminating a month-to-month tenancy.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# OSHA Directives

Current OSHA Directives

- Cancellation of TED 01-00-016 Procedures for Updating OSHA Technical Manual 03/20/2024 - National - 2024-03 (TED 01-00-016) [TED 01-00-016] - Cancellation of TED 01-00-016 Procedures for Updating OSHA Technical Manual
- Cancellation of TED 01-00-014 Guidelines for Developing OSHA Technical Manual 03/07/2024 - National - 2024-02 (TED 01-00-014) [TED 01-00-014] - Cancellation of TED 01-00-014 Guidelines for Developing OSHA Technical Manual
- Cancellation of STD 03-12-003 Guidelines on the Stability of Well Servicing Derricks 03/07/2024 - National - 2024-04 (STD 03-12-003) [STD 03-12-003] - Cancellation of STD 03-12-003 Guidelines on the Stability of Well Servicing Derricks
- Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals 01/26/2024 - National - CPL 02-01-065 [CPL 02-02-045] - Process Safety Management of Highly Hazardous Chemicals
- Regional Emphasis Program for Landscaping Inspections 11/08/2023 - Region 9 - CPL 04-09-2411 - Regional Emphasis Program for Landscaping Inspections
# OAR Box 1338 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



## Document

Number: 

# 5 ) ll-E-1 6 Docket Number: 

# A-89-1 0

Printed 6/17/2008 1:48:05PM Sheet 5of 105 P. 1FL2 _ >—> " 

# RADI A 

# A-89-1 0

RRORAT . "— "
I CONTAC TREPOR

T: r^* Dat e 

# /l/Urc A«? , /// 0 Originato r -vij-,f t A n s i 

## ^&P@CCCE T CONTACTBY : TELEPHON E H MEETIN G D Othe r



# X NAME , TITL E & ORGANIZATIO N "T^^ U H«nJU*, Afpli tJeim

€^y\«r ADDRES S & TELEPHON E NUMBE R ~, . T~TT\j~T 

# 70 l 

# /-6^7-^/7 7 PUMKOb t U M bUBJtu i (uiv e project numoe rI Tappropnaie ) . 

## Cos h o f S.Y ^

0A</ ~ 0^(it.Muk(L A 

## ;cod \*«\f

J^ : SUMMAR Y


## &L/JW* * 

# cA

V CWA^V , 

# 1/

p^^Q^A^

fX^^tk

ACTIO N 

## 8 Distribution :
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 275

AN ACT

For the relief of Suchada Kwong.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 275 ES

1 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SUCHADA

2 KWONG.

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

4 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

5 Act, Suchada Kwong shall be eligible for issuance of an

6 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an

7 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil8 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under

9 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to

10 lawful permanent resident.

11 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Suchada Kwong

12 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci13 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en14 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible,

15 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of

16 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the

17 enactment of this Act.

18 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

19 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap20 plications for issuance of immigrant visas or the applica21 tions for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

22 fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this

23 Act.

24 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

25 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res26 idence to Suchada Kwong, the Secretary of State shall in-
3

S 275 ES

1 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur2 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im3 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

4 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

5 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

6 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

7 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

8 202(e) of such Act.

Passed the Senate August 5, 1999.

Attest:

Secretary.
106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 275

AN ACT

For the relief of Suchada Kwong.
# L_2011231EN.01002101.xml

| 8.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 231/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 231/21

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 903/2011

of 7 September 2011

fixing the import duties applicable to certain husked rice from 8 September 2011

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 137 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than import licences for basmati rice, were issued in respect of 438 104 tonnes for the period from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011. The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 other than basmati rice should therefore be adjusted. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Based on the information provided by the competent authorities, the Commission notes that import licences for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20, other than import licences for basmati rice, were issued in respect of 438 104 tonnes for the period from 1 September 2010 to 31 August 2011. The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 other than basmati rice should therefore be adjusted.

| (2) | The applicable duty must be fixed within 10 days of the end of the period mentioned above. This Regulation should therefore come into force immediately, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The applicable duty must be fixed within 10 days of the end of the period mentioned above. This Regulation should therefore come into force immediately,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The import duty for husked rice falling within CN code 1006 20 shall be EUR 42,5 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 7 September 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

---
SI0-1(K)309-()I 7



# SEEINGEIEL

D Are aChambe r

O f Commerc e Jame s B . Anderso

n CC E springncid , Missour i us.\ . "Everywher e Shoul dBe Lik e This " Presiden t March 1,201 0 The Honorabl e Raymon dH . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S . Department

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Ave , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010.003 4 Dea r Mr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo r th e opportunity t o expres s m y suppor t fo r th e applicatio n fo

r antitrus t immunit y an dpropose djoin t

busmes s agreement

filedb y American Airline s an dJapa n Airlines . Th e propose dallianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l for oneworl dt o compet e effectively with th e Sta

r an dSkyTea

malliance . Thi s increase dinterallianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o f th e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y - first b y solidifyin g U.S.-Japan Ope n Skies , the n by servin g a s afoimdatio n for fiirther liberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte r athoroug h review , I encourag e th e Department o f Transportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i t

yi^oul denabl e thes e oneworl dallianc e airline s t o wor k closel y together

t o delive r highl y competitiv e ai r

transportatio n services . Approval for AA/JA L allianc e wil l hav e apositiv e impac t

o n ai r trave l b y offering customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricinj g option s an dwil l hel p t o ensure tha t customer s continu e t o benefi t firomhavin g thre e competitiv e ai r

alliance s t o choos e from. I urg e yo u t o quickl y approv e thi s application . Sincerely,,.,,., , ,;.,,. . .^^: . I ,;^ , ./j: , . -i, , ..r.,....,-:^ . -/v , , ; ,,. . ;,;.;.;; . • , : , 

### '( \ vvw L • •'" ' T \

w:tac3^ ^

-.•-Ml;.- , Jaal^sB.Andersoi^ . ,,,,.,•,.,..;, , ,.., \.. . ,.(,,. , ., . , , i^'.. •

Joh n Q . Mammon s Enterpris e Cente r• 20 2 Sout h Joh n Q . Hamrhon s Parkway •P.O . Bo x 168 7 • Springfield , Missour i 65801-168 7 417.862.556 7 • fax : 417.862.161 1 • e-mail : info@springfieldchamber.co m • website : www.springfieldchamber.co m
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 17-2008 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      13, 2008
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 7, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40205

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JORGE LEONEL ALONSO-LOPEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. 5:05-CR-1246-ALL

--------------------

Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Leonel

Alonso-Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held

that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a

separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary

affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
To effectuate the retroactive reduction in the monthly rates, the invoice that ServiceProvider delivers to DemandTec in May, 2009 (the “May Invoice”) shall show that the new monthlyrates have been applied to all services rendered in April, 2009. The May Invoice shall also netout the difference between (a) the amount that DemandTec paid for services rendered during Marchunder the old monthly rates and (b) the amount that DemandTec would have paid had the new ratesbeen applied to the March services.     3. Change in Payment Terms. The language under “Payment Terms” in SOW 2 is herebyamended to read in full as follows:“Service Provider shall submit monthly invoices to DemandTec at the end of the monthdetailing the Services performed and the fees incurred in the previous month. DemandTecshall pay Service Provider all undisputed fees within 45 days of its receipt of invoice. Apenalty of 0.5% per month shall apply to all late payments.”     4. No Further Changes. Except as set forth above, the Outsourcing Agreement and SOW 2shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with their respective terms.     5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in counterparts and delivered byfacsimile and all so executed and delivered shall be considered a single original.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hands hereto as of the date first written above.           DEMANDTEC, INC.   SONATA SERVICES LIMITED             By:     /s/ Mark Culhane   By:    /s/ Sean Gao                        Name:     Mark Culhane   Name:     Sean Gao                        Title:     EVP & CFO   Title:     General Manager                        Date:     4/21/09   Date:     4/21/09