alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

RBS Commercial Funding Inc. 

600 Washington Boulevard

Stamford, Connecticut 06901

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for RBS Commercial Funding Inc. Commercial M ortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Serie s 2012-C9

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

February 25, 2016

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
# L_2011163EN.01002201.xml

| 23.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 163/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 163/22

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 609/2011

of 22 June 2011

withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (‘Single CMO’ Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4318 were suspended as from 20 January 2011 by Commission Regulation (EU) No 42/2011 of 19 January 2011 suspending submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas (3), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4318 were suspended as from 20 January 2011 by Commission Regulation (EU) No 42/2011 of 19 January 2011 suspending submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas (3), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009.

| (2) | Following notifications on unused and/or partly used licences, quantities became available again for that order number. The suspension of applications should therefore be withdrawn, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following notifications on unused and/or partly used licences, quantities became available again for that order number. The suspension of applications should therefore be withdrawn,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The suspension laid down by Regulation (EU) No 42/2011 of submission of applications for import licences for order number 09.4318 as from 20 January 2011 is withdrawn.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 22 June 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 82.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 15, 20.1.2011, p. 10.

3

---
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),

this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT : ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE : KRISTINA J. JACOBUCCI GREGORY F. ZOELLER LaPorte, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana KARL M. SCHARNBERG Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana


## IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

JUAQUIN DIAZ

- DELREAL, ) ) Appellant

- Defendant, ) ) vs. ) No. 46A03

- 1404

- CR

- 130 ) STATE OF INDIANA, ) ) Appellee

- Plaintiff. )

APPEAL FROM THE LAPORTE CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Thomas J. Alevizos, Judge Cause No. 46C 01

- 1302

- FD

- 729
January 12, 2015 MEMORANDUM DECISION ON REHEARING
- NOT FOR PUBLICATION SULLIVAN, Senior Judge2



### Juaquin Diaz

- Delreal has filed a petition for rehearing from this Court’s
memorandum decision affirming Diaz

- Delreal’s sentence, but reversing and remand ing the
matter to the trial court to vacate the judgment of conviction as a Class D felony and enter a judgment of conviction as a Class A misdemeanor, as explicitly provided for in the plea agreement

. See Diaz

- Delreal v. State , No. 46A03

- 1404

- CR

- 130 (Ind. Ct. App. Octobe r 27, 2014). We grant Diaz

- Delreal’s petition to clarify a factual issue, but otherwise affirm our opinion in all respects. Diaz

- Delreal contends that we misstated the record with respect to his criminal history in our review of his sentencing argument. In particular, he challenges our statement that his criminal history consisted of a prior adjudication for what would be battery if committed by an adult, contendi ng instead that he was s atisfactorily released from supervised probation while the matter pe nded under advisement. Assuming that Diaz

Delreal’s representation of the record is correct, we affirm his sentence nonetheless. An appellant bears the burden of showing both prongs of the A ppellate Rule 7(B) inquiry in order to obtain a revision of his s entence. Anderson v. State , 989 N.E.2d 823, 827 (Ind. Ct. App. 2013). We noted in our opinion that Diaz

- Delreal’s criminal history was not among the worst. However, the focus of our review concerned the nature of the offense. The victim of Diaz

- Delreal ’s criminal recklessness almost died from his injuries. He suffered extreme pain from skull and orbital bone fractures and now no longer has sensation in the jaw area. On this ground alone, namely the nature of the offense, we conclude that Diaz

- Delreal has failed to meet his burden of establishing that his sentence is inappropriate.3



### Aside from this factual clarification, we affirm our original opinion in all respects

. Affirmed. MAY, J., and BROWN, J., concur.
Attachment 2

United States Office of Personnel Management

FEDWIRE INSTRUCTIONS

Fedwire

Field Tag

Fedwire Field Name Required Information

{1510} Type/Subtype 1000

{2000} Amount (Enter payment amount.)

{3400} Receiver ABA routing number * 021030004

{3400} Receiver ABA short name TREAS NYC

{3600} Business Function Code CTR (or CTP)

{4200} Beneficiary Identifier (account number) (Enter 8 digit ALC or 12 digit Credit Gateway account #.

OPM2’s 8 digit ALC is: 24000002. OPM2’s Credit Gateway 

12 digit account # is: 824000002001.)

{4200} Beneficiary Name OPM2 (Make sure to enter “OPM2” and not just “OPM”, as 

there are several ALCs associated with OPM.)

{5000} Originator (Enter the name of the payor/remitter. If you are a federal 

agency with a Payroll Office Number, also enter your PON 

number.)

{6000} Originator to Beneficiary Information –

Line 1

(Enter information to identify the purpose of the payment.)

{6000} Originator to Beneficiary Information –

Line 2

(Enter information to identify the purpose of the payment.)

{6000} Originator to Beneficiary Information –

Line 3

(Enter information to identify the purpose of the payment.)

{6000} Originator to Beneficiary Information –

Line 4

(Enter information to identify the purpose of the payment.)

 * The financial institution address for Treasury’s routing number is 33 Liberty Street, New York, NY 10045
#### Lynn Prucnal, Plaintiff, v DNG Acquisition Group, LLC, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Green*1006view Landscape Co., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant.

(Appeal No. 1.)

[773 NYS2d 640]

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Patrick H. NeMoyer, J.), entered October 3, 2002, upon a jury verdict, in favor of third-party plaintiff on liability. The order, insofar as appealed from, directed third-party defendant to pay plaintiff damages pursuant to a settlement agreement.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for injuries she sustained when she slipped and fell in a parking lot owned by defendant-third-party plaintiff, DNG Acquisition Group, LLC (DNG). DNG commenced a third-party action against third-party defendant, Greenview Landscape Co. (Greenview), asserting breach of contract on the ground that Greenview failed to plow the parking lot on the day plaintiff was injured. Pursuant to a settlement agreement, plaintiff agreed to the amount of damages, and a trial was conducted on the issue whether DNG or Greenview was liable to plaintiff for those damages. We reject the contention of Greenview that Supreme Court erred in denying its CPLR 4401 motion seeking to dismiss the third-party complaint. DNG presented evidence that Greenview breached the contract by failing and refusing to plow its parking lot on the day plaintiff was injured, and thus it cannot be said that “there is no rational process by which the fact trier could base a finding in favor of [DNG]” *(Szczerbiak v Pilat,*90 NY2d 553, 556 [1997]). The court also properly determined that the contract is ambiguous with respect to payment for the plowing services inasmuch as the payment provisions are “susceptible of more than one interpretation” *(Chimart Assoc. v Paul,*66 NY2d 570, 573 [1986]). Thus, the court properly submitted to the jury the issue whether it was reasonable for Greenview to treat its contract with DNG as cancelled based upon DNG’s failure to pay three invoices. Finally, we reject Greenview’s contention that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence *(see Manna v Hubbard,*254 *1007AD2d 693 [1998]; *Greene v Frontier Cent. School Dist.,*214 AD2d 947, 948 [1995]). Present—Pigott, Jr., P.J., Pine, Wisner, Scudder and Kehoe, JJ.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 of Vitacost.com, Inc. (the “Company”) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey J. Horowitz, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Jeffrey J. HorowitzJeffrey J. HorowitzChief Executive OfficerDate: June 16, 2011
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Gerald Diakow, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Ameriwest Minerals
     Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of January, 2008.


/s/ Gerald Diakow
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
Order entered October 6, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 20

- 00610

- CV
OLD VICKERY SQUARE TOWNHOMES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION AND JAMES HARRINGTON, JR., Appellant s

V.
AMANDA YLITALO, Appellee
On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC

- 19

- 17312

ORDER
Before the Court is the October 2, 2020 agreed second motion signed by all parties for an extension of time for a ppellants to file their respective briefs on the merits. The parties inform the Court that they are in the process of finalizing
settlement documents. We GRANT the motion and extend the time to November 4, 2020 for appellants to file either a motion to d ismiss the appeal or their respective briefs on the merits. We caution appellants that further extension requests will be disfavored.

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.3

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report Of Foreign Private Issuer pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Satelites
Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V. (the "Company") on Form 20-F for the year ended December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Lauro Gonzalez Moreno, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, that to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                  /S/ LAURO GONZALEZ MORENO
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Lauro Gonzalez Moreno
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

June 30, 2003
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Situation in and in Relation to Syria

                        On October 14, 2019, by Executive Order 13894, the President declared a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States constituted by the situation in and in relation to Syria.                    

The situation in and in relation to Syria undermines the campaign to defeat the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, or ISIS, endangers civilians, and further threatens to undermine the peace, security, and stability in the region, and continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13894 of October 14, 2019, must continue in effect beyond October 14, 2024. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 13894 with respect to the situation in and in relation to Syria.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2024-23825

Billing code 3395-F4-P
2003 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

4-22-2003

Flecha v. Shannon

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket 01-2610

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2003 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Flecha v. Shannon" (2003). 2003 Decisions. Paper 635.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2003/635
NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

____________

No: 01-2610

____________

CARLOS M. FLECHA, JR.,

 Appellant

 v.

MR. R. SHANNON;

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE

COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA;

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Civil Action No. 00-cv-05455)

District Judge: Honorable Robert F. Kelly 

_______________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

on March 4, 2003

Before: ROTH, BARRYand FUENTES CIRCUIT JUDGES

(Opinion filed: April 21, 2003)
2

______________

OPINION

______________

ROTH, Circuit Judge:

Carlos Flecha appeals the denial of his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus which was

dismissed without an evidentiary hearing in the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania. 

On June 13, 2000, Flecha filed his Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus relief with the

District Court under the docket number 00-2984. On June 29, 2000, the District Court

granted Flecha an additional 120 days to re-file his petition. This Order was also docketed

under number 00-2984. On October 27, Flecha re-filed his petition with the District Court. 

However, this petition was docketed under a different number of 00-5455. Therefore, the

re-filed petition was improperly dismissed because it was incorrectly docketed.

We remand to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Eastern District

of Pennsylvania to correctly docket the re-filed petition, filed on October 27, 2000, under

docket number 00-2984.
3

 

TO THE CLERK:

Please file the foregoing Opinion.

By the Court,

 /s/ Jane R. Roth 

 Circuit Judge
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 456 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 83926)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-56, K2025-55.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24063 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P