alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CAUSE NO. 2011-52441-D 

Miguel Herrera, Leonor Castaneda, § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF 

Jose Salvador Herrera Castaneda, § 

David Leobardo Herrera Castaneda, § 

Jasmin Guadalupe Herrera Castaneda § 

and Jesus Emanuel Herrera Castaneda § 

 § 

 Plaintiffs, § 

 § 

v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 

 § 

EOG Resources, Inc., § 

The Crosby Group, LLC, § 

Patterson (GP) LLC, Patterson-UTI § 

Energy Inc., Patterson-UTI Drilling § 

Company LLC, Patterson Petroleum, LLC § 

Ambar Lone Star Fluid Services, § 

and John Does 1-5, § 

 § 

Defendants. § 334TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT 

Plaintiff’s Amended Notice of Appeal 

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THIS COURT: 

Notice is hereby given that Plaintiffs, Miguel Herrera, Leonor Castaneda, Jose Salvador 

Herrera Castaneda, David Leobardo Herrera Castaneda, Jasmin Guadalupe Herrera Castaneda 

and Jesus Emanuel Herrera Castaneda, hereby appeals to the First or Fourteenth Court of 

Appeals from the Order granting Defendant EOG Resources, Inc.’s Motion for Traditional 

Summary Judgment and the Order granting Defendant EOG Resources, Inc.’s Motion for NoEvidence Summary Judgment, both entered in this action on the 6th day of July, 2015. 

 

9/3/2015 4:59:14 PM

Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 6792610

By: DAVIA FORD

Filed: 9/3/2015 4:59:14 PM

ACCEPTED

14-15-00750-CV

FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

9/21/2015 4:05:17 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/21/2015 4:05:17 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
Respectfully submitted, 

 ARNOLD & ITKIN, LLP 

 

/s/ Caj D. Boatright 

 ____________________________ 

 Kurt Arnold 

 State Bar No. 24036150 

karnold@arnolditkin.com

Caj D. Boatright 

State Bar No. 24036237 

cboatright@arnolditkin.com 

6009 Memorial Drive 

Houston, Texas 77007 

Telephone: (713) 222-3800 

 Facsimile: (713) 222-3850 

e-service@arnolditkin.com 

 COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS 

 THE KIM LAW FIRM 

 /s/ John Kim 

 

 John Kim 

 State Bar No. 00784393 

 jhk@thekimlawfirm.com 

 4309 Yoakum Blvd., #2000 

 Houston, Texas 77006 

 Telephone: (713) 522-1177 

 Facsimile: (888) 809-6793 

 CO-COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing document has 

been forwarded to all counsel of record in accordance with the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure 

on this 3rd day of September, 2015. 

Douglas D’Arche 

Baker Hostetler 

811 Main, Suite 1100 

Houston, TX 77002 

Counsel for EOG Resources, Inc.

Tim Hurley 

Jose R. Cot 

Hurley & Cot 

365 Canal Street, Suite 2750 

New Orleans, Louisiana 70130 

Counsel for The Crosby Group, Inc. 

David Merkley 

Sarah Jones 

Germer Gertz LLP 

333 Clay Street, Suite 4950 

Houston, Texas 77002 

Counsel for Basin Engineering, LLC 

/s/ Caj D. Boatright 

_______________________________ 

Caj D. Boatright
#### Ex parte RHODER.

No. 15242.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1932.

Fletcher S. Jones, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MOBBOW, P. J.

By indictment filed in the criminal district; court of Jefferson county, the appellant was charged, with the theft'of an automobile of the value of $609, the offense being a felony. The costs in the case amounted to $339.93. The disposition of the case, as shown by the statement of facts, was as follows:

> “This day this cause was called for trial, both parties appeared and announced ready for trial, and defendant pleaded ‘Guilty’ to the complaint herein, waived a trial by a jury and submitted his cause to the Court. Wherefore, it is considered by the Court that the defendant is guilty of the charge alleged in the complaint, and his punishment is assessed at 30 days in jail.

> “It is therefore considered, ordered and adjudged by the Court, that the State of Texas, do have and recover of defendant, S. J. Bhoder, all costs of this prosecution, and the defendant is hereby remanded to the custody of the Sheriff, who will commit him to the jail of said County until said sentence is served and costs are paid.

> “And execution may issue .against the property of the defendant for the amount of said fine and costs.”

 As the record is understood, the conviction of the appellant was not under the indictment. The offense charged in the indictment is defined in article 1429, P. C. 1925. The conviction is of the offense defined in article 1341, P. C. The indictment charged theft, a felony. The misdemeanor denounced is article 1341, supra, which is the driving of an automobile without the consent of the owner. This is not an offense included in the indictment for theft. See article 695, O. C. P., enumerating the offenses embracing lower degreea If we understand the record, the state abandoned the felony charge and caused the complaint for a misdemeanor to be filed; and it is upon that complaint that the conviction was had. The felony indictment having been abandoned, there is known to this court no authority under the law for holding the appellant in jail for the costs that accrued by reason of the indictment for the felony. The provisions of chapter 205, Acts of 42d Legislature, Begular Session (Vernon’s Ann'. O. C.'P. arts. 1019, 1027), are not deemed applicable. That statute apparently is designed to authorize the collection of the costs against one who is accused and tried under an indictment for a felony, but convicted of a lower grade of offense, which is a misdemeanor.

It appearing from the record that all the costs chargeable to the appellant, that is, the costs accruing in the misdemeanor prosecution, having been satisfied and he having-served the thirty days that he was condemned to spend in jail, there is apparently no legal authority for longer holding him in custody upon the conviction mentioned. It is therefore ordered that he be discharged.
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Stephen G. Schulz, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 165]

Appeals by the defendant (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Copertino, J.), rendered November 1, 1999, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence, (2), by permission, from an order of the same court, dated September 5, 2000, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 to vacate the judgment of conviction, and (3), by permission, from an order of the same court dated February 10, 2003, which denied, without a hearing, his motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (g) to vacate the judgment of conviction.

Ordered that the judgment and the orders are affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution *(see People v Contes,*60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it *800was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence *(see*CPL 470.15 [5]).

The Supreme Court properly precluded the defendant from introducing evidence of third-party culpability at trial, since the proffered evidence was lacking in any probative value *(see People v Primo,*96 NY2d 351 [2001]).

The Supreme Court also properly denied the defendant’s motions to vacate the judgment of conviction on the grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel pursuant to CPL 440.10 and “newly discovered evidence” pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (g). As set forth above, the Supreme Court properly precluded the defendant from introducing evidence of third-party culpability at the trial. Consequently, trial counsel was not ineffective for failure to persuade the trial court to admit such evidence at the trial.

Moreover, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (1) (g) without a hearing. That motion was based primarily upon the posttrial identification by one of the eyewitnesses of a third-party as the “true” perpetrator. Contrary to the defendant’s contention, this did not constitute newly discovered evidence *(see People v Salemi,*309 NY 208, 215-216 [1955], *cert denied*350 US 950 [1956]; *People v Priori,*164 NY 459, 472 [1900]). We reject the defendant’s claim that this evidence could not have been procured with due diligence at the time of the trial, since the eyewitness in question testified at the trial *(see People v Salemi, supra).*

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit. Altman, J.P., S. Miller, Krausman and Cozier, JJ., concur.
---

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Wenbin Zhu, the Chief Financial Officer of
CHINA SHESAYS MEDICAL COSMETOLOGY, INC. (the "Company"), do hereby certify
that:

1. The Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2011, (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has executed this statement
this 19th day of August, 2011.

/s/ Wenbin ZhuWenbin Zhu Chief Financial
Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to China SHESAYS Medical Cosmetology Inc. and will be
retained by China SHESAYS Medical Cosmetology Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. The forgoing
certification is being furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
pursuant to § 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not being filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or
after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such
filing.

---
CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Lindsay Gorrill, the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Star Gold Corp. (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: (i)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company, for the quarter  ended
	October 31, 2009, and to which this certification is attached as Exhibit 32 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  By:/s/Lindsay GorrillName:Lindsay GorrillTitle:Chief Executive Officer and ChiefFinancial OfficerDate:December 14, 2009 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2085

_____________________________

LYLE FRANKLIN FORREST, JR.,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County.

Michael A. Flowers, Judge.

July 25, 2018

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. See Jordan v. State, 549 So. 2d 805, 806 (Fla. 1st 

DCA 1989).

WOLF, LEWIS, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Lyle Franklin Forrest, Jr., pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 99.8
                                                                    ------------

                              OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

                                       OF

                          FRANKLIN CAPITAL CORPORATION


     This  certificate is being  delivered  pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale
and  Servicing  Agreement,  dated as of June 1,  2002 (the  "Agreement"),  among
Franklin  Auto  Trust  2002-1,   Franklin   Receivables  LLC,  Franklin  Capital
Corporation (the "Servicer") and Franklin Resources Inc.

     The  undersigned,  the duly elected  qualified and acting  President of the
Servicer,  DOES HEREBY CERTIFY, in my capacity as President and on behalf of the
Servicer,  as follows: (i) a review of the activities of the Servicer during the
preceding  12-month period and of its  performance  under the Agreement has been
made  under my  supervision  and (ii) to the best of my  knowledge,  based on my
review,  except with respect to the requirement  that an agreed-upon  procedures
report (the  "Report") be delivered by a firm of  independent  certified  public
accountants  pursuant  to  Section  4.11  of the  Agreement,  the  Servicer  has
fulfilled all of its  obligations  under the Agreement  throughout the year. The
Servicer  expects that the Report will be  delivered by the firm of  independent
public accountants to the Servicer,  the Seller, the Owner Trustee,  the Trustee
and the Security Insurer on or before January 31, 2004.

     Capitalized  terms used herein but not  otherwise  defined  herein have the
meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  I have  hereunto set my hand this 27th day of October
2003.



                                   By: /S/ HAROLD E. MILLER, JR.
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Name:    Harold E. Miller, Jr.
                                       Title:   President/CEO
**EXHIBIT32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this quarterly report of Amiworld, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below,        certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: May 15, 2009 | s/Mamoru Saito____________________

Mamoru Saito, Chief Executive Officer |
|---------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated: May 15, 2009 | s/Ingrely Veitia____________________

Ingrely Veitia, Chief Financial Officer |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. §1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Camden Learning
Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned Chief Executive Officer certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
            To
      my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
      all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
      of the Company, for the period covered by this
  report.




DATE:
      May 11, 2009
                /s/ David
      L. WarnockDavid
      L. WarnockPrincipal
      Executive Officer





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Camden Learning Corporation and will be retained by Camden Learning
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82670-82671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23580]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20705 and #20706; VIRGINIA Disaster Number VA-
20011]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
Commonwealth of Virginia

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4831-DR), dated 
October 1, 2024.

DATES: Issued on October 4, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: December 2, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: July 1, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Virginia, dated October 1, 024, is hereby 
amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the 
disaster:
    Incident: Tropical Storm Helene.
    Incident Period: September 25, 2024 and continuing.

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): 
Montgomery, Pulaski.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Virginia: Floyd, Independent City of Radford, Roanoke County.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.


[[Page 82671]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-23580 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
 
 Regency Energy Partners To Acquire CDM Resource Management, Ltd.
 Acquisition To Create Additional Synergies for Regency Assets
      1




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



www.regencyenergy.com
  Shannon.ming@regencygas.com elizabeth.browne@hck2.com
 3
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 201 (Thursday, October 17, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 83628-83629]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23894]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Part 9

[PS Docket Nos. 21-479, 18-64; FCC 24-78; FR ID 250243]


Facilitating Implementation of Next Generation 911 Services 
(NG911); Location-Based Routing for Wireless 911 Calls; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 83629]]

SUMMARY: This document corrects an error by deleting an incorrect 
sentence in the Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis section of a 
final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on September 24, 2024, 
regarding the implementation of Next Generation 911.

DATES: This correction is effective October 17, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact John 
Evanoff of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau, Policy and 
Licensing Division, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#357f5a5d5b1b7043545b5a5353755356561b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8fc5e0e7e1a1caf9eee1e0e9e9cfe9ececa1e8e0f9">[email protected]</span></a> or 202-418-0848.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Communications Commission (the 
Commission) is correcting an error in the Facilitating Implementation 
of Next Generation 911 Services (NG911); Location-Based Routing for 
Wireless 911 Calls; Report and Order, published as a final rule in the 
Federal Register on September 24, 2024, at 89 FR 78066. In the Final 
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, an incorrect sentence was 
inadvertently included that created an inconsistency with the rest of 
the document. The Commission released a Second Erratum on October 1, 
2024 that deleted the corresponding incorrect sentence in the Report 
and Order.

Correction

    In FR Doc. No. 2024-18603, in the Federal Register of September 24, 
2024, on page 78118, in the first and second column, the following 
sentence is removed:
    ``For all OSPs, the initial compliance date will be extended based 
on the effective date of the rules--i.e. no OSP must comply with a 911 
Authority Phase 1 request sooner than one year after the effective date 
of these rules, regardless of the timing of the 911 Authority's 
request.''.

Federal Communications Commission.
Debra Jordan,
Chief, Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau.
[FR Doc. 2024-23894 Filed 10-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
DffTOFTRANSPOBWIO ^ 1 • ' I ,u ! I n • ! I o Offic e o f th e Secretary , DOT OST-2010-004 6 T o Who mi t Concerns , W e wan t to liv e i n Mountain Tim

e Zone . Ever

y fe w year s th e sam

e bunc h trie s ane

w gimmic k t o forc e Centra

l Tim e o n u s an d the y neve

r wan t to hav e afai

r vot e wher e everyone get s t o vote , onl

y wan t their backer s t o ge

t t o coun t in survey s an

d privat e polls . Let s g o t o th e genera

l electio n thi s fal

l and vot e - al l o f us . Than k Yo u