alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3647 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide that United States 

citizens’ sons and daughters with mental or physical disabilities be considered immediate relatives for purposes of exemption from numerical 

limitations on visas issued to such sons and daughters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 

Mr. O’ROURKE (for himself and Mr. PEARCE) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide 

that United States citizens’ sons and daughters with 

mental or physical disabilities be considered immediate 

relatives for purposes of exemption from numerical limitations on visas issued to such sons and daughters. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fairness for Families 

5 Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3647 IH

1 SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF MENTAL OR PHYSICAL DISABILITY. 

2 Section 101(a) of the Immigration and Nationality 

3 Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)) is amended by adding at the end 

4 the following: 

5 ‘‘(53) The term ‘mental or physical disability’ 

6 means, in the case of an individual, a mental or 

7 physical impairment, or physical disability that— 

8 ‘‘(A) a licensed physician designated by the 

9 Secretary of State pursuant to section 40.11 of 

10 title 22, Code of Federal Regulations for pur11 poses of making examinations pursuant to sec12 tion 212(a)(1) has determined, by examining 

13 the individual, renders the individual unable to 

14 care for himself or herself as an adult; and 

15 ‘‘(B) due to such impairment or disability, 

16 the individual’s parent or sibling is solely re17 sponsible for the care of the individual.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. UNITED STATES CITIZENS’ SONS AND DAUGHTERS 

19 WITH MENTAL OR PHYSICAL DISABILITIES 

20 TO BE CONSIDERED IMMEDIATE RELATIVES. 

21 Section 201(b)(2)(A)(i) of the Immigration and Na22 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1151(b)(2)(A)(i)) is amended by 

23 inserting after ‘‘children, spouses,’’ the following: ‘‘sons 

24 and daughters with mental or physical disabilities,’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32


<PAGE>




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Strainwise, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Shawn Phillips, the Principal Executive
Officer, and Erin Phillips, the Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of their knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects the financial condition and results of the Company.


June 22, 2015                    By: /s/ Shawn Phillips
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Shawn Phillips, Principal Executive Officer



                                 By: /s/ Erin Phillips
                                     ---------------------------------
                                     Erin Phillips, Principal Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20705 and #20706; VIRGINIA Disaster Number VA-20011]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the Commonwealth of Virginia (FEMA-4831-DR), dated October 1, 2024.

# DATES:

Issued on October 4, 2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         December 2, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         July 1, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of Virginia, dated October 1, 024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Incident:*                     Tropical Storm Helene.                

*Incident Period:*                     September 25, 2024 and continuing.                

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Montgomery, Pulaski.                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

Virginia: Floyd, Independent City of Radford, Roanoke County.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.
      ( print page 82671)    
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-23580 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ODESSA BROWN,

Petitioner

v.

WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEAL 

BOARD (THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF 

PHILADELPHIA),

Respondents

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 311 EAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the 

Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of February, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
) DRAFT Clothes Washer Rulemakings Schedule

Feb Mr AprMay Jn Jly AugSep Oct Nov Dec Jn Feb Mr Apr May Jn Jly Aug Sep Oct NovDec Jan Feb Mr Apr May Jn Jly Aug Sep Oct

,'9,7 '9_7_ '97 'I9 '97 97 '97 '97 '97 '97 '97 '98 '98 '98 '98 '98 9 98 '98 '98 '98 '98 '98 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99

Test Procedures

Draft Final Rule

Approve Final Rule

Issue Final Rule ,

Federal Register Proof

'Publish Final Rule

Standards

Rulemaking Framework

Stakeholder Review,

DOE discussion wA Stakeholders __ _

Notice of Workshop

Comment Period

Rulcmaking Framcwink W.S. _ _ _

- Data Collection

Eng. AnalJLCC/Cand. Std. Lev. __ __

Prcl. National Forecasting

If data avail. Cash Flow Anal.

Notice of Availability

Comment Period

Draft ANOPR li I I 

Approval of ANOPR

Publish ANOPR

Comment Period

WorkshoT 41

Revise ANOPR Analyses

Consumcr Subgroup Aalysis'

Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Utility/Envun sntal Analyses __ __

Notice of A Anvailability

Commse"t Period

Drftt NOPR

DOJ & OMB Review

*Approval or NOPR

Issue NOPR

Comment Period d&Heng...

Rev. Cmnts Revise Anal.I

Stakeholdne Review I

Final Rule Doaft/Approval

OMBSRevh d &Approval i

Publsh Fusal Ru

DOI consultition and OMB review and approval.

_I
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2763 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2763

 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit owners and operators 
   to use certain practices to meet the requirement for establishing 
   approved vegetative cover on highly erodible cropland subject to 
                    conservation reserve contracts.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2000

  Mr. Baucus introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to permit owners and operators 
   to use certain practices to meet the requirement for establishing 
   approved vegetative cover on highly erodible cropland subject to 
                    conservation reserve contracts.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DEFINITION OF VEGETATIVE COVER.

    Section 1201(a)(17)(A) of the Food Security Act of 1985 (16 U.S.C. 
3801(a)(17)(A)) is amended by inserting before the semicolon the 
following: ``, including (in an area with low precipitation or limited 
availability of native seed) a mixed stand of least 3 introduced 
grasses and at least 1 shrub, forb, or legume species that is well 
suited for wildlife in the area''.
                                 <all>
```
# Joh n A . Porte r

Jun e 1,201 0 U . S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n Docke t Operations , M-3 0 Wes t Buildin g groun d floo

r Roo mW12-14 0 1200 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Exemptio n No . 652I F i^^niatoi7©ocke t

No . FAA-2002-ir2t6 3 Gentlemen ; Thi s i s t o reques t

a n extensio n o f

exemptio n No . 65 2 I F fiom1 4 CFR , FA R91.10 9 (A ) (B ) (3) , whic h wil l expir

e o n Octobe

r 31,2010 . The exonptio n fo

r fligh t instructio n i n Beedicraf

l airplane s equippe d wit

h afunctioning throwove r contro l wheel i n plac e o f

functionin g dua

l control s remain s th e same a s i n m y letter s date d March 29,1996 , Apri l 14,1998 , Apri l 9,2002 , Ma y 26,2004 , Jun e 1,200 6 and Ma y 27,2008. . 1 hav e sinc e Ma

y o f 1989 , serve d a s a

n instructo r

fo r th e America

n Bonanz aSociet

y Air Safet y Foundation . BPPP ha s been issue d an extraisio n o f th e exemptio n fo

r whid i I a m amember . Sincerely John A . Porter CFII138002 0

2 9 Walnu t Via , Anaheim , Californi a92801-104 5 714-526-657 6
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-08-00666-CV

In re Danny Leon Lucas

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

___________________________________________

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Justices Patterson, Waldrop and Henson

Filed: November 13, 2008
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-30748

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff–Appellee,

v.

DARVIN RAY PHILLIPS, also known as Cadillac,

Defendant–Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 1:00-CR-10002-1

Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Darvin Ray Phillips, federal prisoner # 62339-079, appeals the denial of

his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a reduction of sentence based on the

November 1, 2007, retroactive amendments to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, the Sentencing

Guideline pertaining to crack cocaine offenses. Phillips was originally sentenced

to 262 months of imprisonment following his conviction for conspiracy to possess

with intent to distribute cocaine hydrochloride and cocaine base. However,

pursuant to a Rule 35 motion, Phillips’s sentence was reduced by 40 percent,

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

February 17, 2010

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

Case: 08-30748 Document: 00511029060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/17/2010
No. 08-30748

2

resulting in an amended sentence of 158 months of imprisonment. Citing

U.S.S.G. § 1B1.10(b)(2)(B), Phillips contends that the district court should have

reduced his 158-month sentence by 40 percent to 126 months of imprisonment.

Phillips further argues that the district court did not reference the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) factors or provide any explanation for the sentence imposed.

A district court may reduce a term of imprisonment pursuant to

§ 3582(c)(2) if it is based upon a sentencing range that has subsequently been

lowered by an amendment to the Guidelines, and the reduction is consistent

with the policy statements issued by the Sentencing Commission. § 3582(c)(2).

We review a district court’s denial of a reduction under § 3582(c)(2) for an abuse

of discretion, its interpretation of the Guidelines de novo, and its findings of fact

for clear error. United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d at 667, 672 (5th Cir. 2009).

Phillips has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in

deciding not to reduce his sentence further or with respect to its consideration

of the § 3553(a) factors or reasons. See United States v. Cooley, 590 F.3d 293,

297-98 (5th Cir. 2009); Evans, 587 F.3d at 673-74. Accordingly, the judgment of

the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case: 08-30748 Document: 00511029060 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/17/2010
S. 2722

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

An Act

To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to Ed W. Freeman, James K.

Okubo, and Andrew J. Smith.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of

the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO ED W. FREEMAN, JAMES K. OKUBO, AND ANDREW J. SMITH.

(a) INAPPLICABILITY OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Notwithstanding

the time limitations in section 3744(b) of title 10, United States

Code, or any other time limitation, the President may award the

Medal of Honor under section 3741 of such title to the persons

specified in subsection (b) for the acts specified in that subsection,

the award of the Medal of Honor to such persons having been

determined by the Secretary of the Army to be warranted in accordance with section 1130 of such title.

(b) PERSONS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE THE MEDAL OF HONOR.—

The persons referred to in subsection (a) are the following:

(1) Ed W. Freeman, for conspicuous acts of gallantry and

intrepidity at the risk of his life and beyond the call of duty

on November 14, 1965, as flight leader and second-in-command

of a helicopter lift unit at landing zone X–Ray in the Battle

of the Ia Drang Valley, Republic of Vietnam, during the

Vietnam War, while serving in the grade of Captain in Alpha

Company, 229th Assault Helicopter Battalion, 101st Cavalry

Division (Airmobile).

(2) James K. Okubo, for conspicuous acts of gallantry and

intrepidity at the risk of his life and beyond the call of duty

on October 28 and 29, and November 4, 1944, at Foret

Domaniale de Champ, near Biffontaine, France, during World

War II, while serving as an Army medic in the grade of Technician Fifth Grade in the medical detachment, 442d Regimental

Combat Team.

(3) Andrew J. Smith, for conspicuous acts of gallantry

and intrepidity at the risk of his life and beyond the call

of duty on November 30, 1864, in the Battle of Honey Hill,

South Carolina, during the Civil War, while serving as a corporal in the 55th Massachusetts Voluntary Infantry Regiment.

(c) POSTHUMOUS AWARD.—The Medal of Honor may be awarded

under this section posthumously, as provided in section 3752 of

title 10, United States Code.
S. 2722—2

(d) PRIOR AWARD.—The Medal of Honor may be awarded under

this section for service for which a Silver Star, or other award,

has been awarded.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

10-17-2005

Wilson v. Beard

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 04-2461

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Wilson v. Beard" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 293.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/293
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 _______________

No. 04-2461

________________

ZACHARY WILSON

 v.

JEFFREY A. BEARD, Commissioner of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections;

DONALD T. VAUGHN, Superintendent of the State Correctional Institution at

Graterford,

 Appellants

____________________________________

Before: SCIRICA, Chief Judge, ROTH and BECKER, Circuit Judges

_______________________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

_______________________

On page 10, the last sentence of the second full paragraph, is amended to read as

follows:

It does contend, however, that Wilson could have discovered the existence

of the videotape as early as April 1, 1997, and that, if he could, his petition

was filed four days too late.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward R. Becker 

Circuit Judge
DATED: October 17, 2005

nmb/cc: (Thomas W. Dolgenos, Esq. 

(J. Hunter Bennett, Esq. 

Michael Wiseman, Esq. 

Christina A. Swarns, Esq.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2865 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2865

To designate certain land of the National Forest System located in the 
                    State of Virginia as wilderness.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2000

 Mr. Robb (for himself and Mr. Warner) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate certain land of the National Forest System located in the 
                    State of Virginia as wilderness.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Virginia Wilderness Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF WILDERNESS AREAS.

    Section 1 of the Act entitled ``An Act to designate certain 
National Forest System lands in the States of Virginia and West 
Virginia as wilderness areas'' (Public Law 100-326; 102 Stat. 584) is 
amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period and inserting 
        a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) certain land in the George Washington National 
        Forest, comprising approximately 6,500 acres, as generally 
        depicted on a map entitled `The Priest Wilderness Study Area', 
        dated June 6, 2000, to be known as the `Priest Wilderness 
        Area'; and
            ``(8) certain land in the George Washington National 
        Forest, comprising approximately 4,800 acres, as generally 
        depicted on a map entitled `The Three Ridges Wilderness Study 
        Area', dated June 6, 2000, to be known as the `Three Ridges 
        Wilderness Area.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Frank R. Martire, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metavante Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Frank R. Martire   
|Frank R. Martire       
|Chief Executive Officer
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 20

- 00019

- CV

S TEVEN A. H AYES

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS , Appellee §

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 158th District Court

of Denton County ( F

- 2005

- 1603

- B )

July 15, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court ’ s judgment

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _ /s/ Elizabeth Kerr

__________________ Justice Elizabeth Kerr