alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Khaldoun Hussari, Appellant.

[774 NYS2d 725]

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (D’Emic, J.), rendered October 31, 2001, convicting him of criminal contempt in the first degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, to hear and report on whether the defendant was competent to stand trial with all convenient speed in accordance herewith; and it is further,

Ordered that the appeal is held in abeyance in the interim.

The trial court ordered a competency examination pursuant to CPL article 730. However, no examination was ever performed, no competency hearing was held and the court proceeded to trial without a determination on the defendant’s competency to stand trial.

Once the trial court made a threshold determination that the defendant’s conduct warranted an examination, it should have followed the procedures mandated by CPL article 730. The fail*698ure to comply with the statute deprived the defendant of the right to a full and fair determination of his mental capacity to stand trial (see *People v Armlin,*37 NY2d 167 [1975]; *People v Torres,*162 AD2d 482, 483 [1990]; *People v Mullins,*137 AD2d 227, 232 [1988]). We find, however, that the requirements of CPL article 730 may be satisfied by a reconstruction hearing (see *People v Hudson,*19 NY2d 137 [1967], *cert denied*398 US 944 [1970]; *People v Mulholland,*129 AD2d 857 [1987]; *People v Arnold,*113 AD2d 101 [1985]). By decision and order on motion dated February 25, 2004, this Court granted, on consent, the People’s motion to enlarge the record on appeal to include, among other things, certain of the defendant’s medical and psychiatric records. A review of those medical and psychiatric records, as well as the trial record in this case, indicates that a meaningful inquiry into the defendant’s competency can be made (see *People v Hudson, supra; People v Mulholland, supra; People v Arnold, supra).*Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for a hearing to determine whether the defendant was competent to stand trial.

We decide no other issues raised by the defendant at this time. Altman, J.P., Krausman, Crane and Cozier, JJ., concur.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T F R AN K K E NN E T H B E NS ON , P et i t i on er- A pp el l ee , v. D. K. S I S T O, R e s p o n d e n t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 16945 D. C . No . 2 : 0 7 - c v - 0 2 2 4 4 - J KS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia J a m e s K . S i ngl e t on, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d S e pt e m be r27, 2011 ** B efo re: H A W K IN S , S IL V E R M A N , an dW . F L E T C H E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. W a r d e n D . K . S is to ap p e a ls f r o m th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s g r an t o f F r an kK e n n e th B enson’ s 28 U . S . C . § 2 25 4 p et i t i on for habeas corpus. W e have j uri sdi ct i on un der 28 U . S . C . § 2253, a nd, be c aus e of i nt e rve ni ng author i ty , w e va c a t e a nd r e m and.



# FI LED OC T 5 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 16945 2 T h e d istrict co u rt g ra n tedB en so n re li ef o n th e g ro u n dth at th e s tate co u rt’s de c i s i on w a s c ontr a ryt o C a l i f orni a ’ s “ s om e e vi de nc e ” s t anda r d, a nd w a s ba s e d on a n u n r e a s o n ab le d e te rm in a tio n o f th e f a c ts in lig h t o f

th e e v id e n c e . W h ile th is appe a l w a s pe ndi ng, the S upr e m e C ourtde c i de d Sw artho utv. C oo ke , 1 3 1 S . C t. 85 9 (20 11 ) ( per c uri am ). In thatca se , the C ou rthel d thatthe on l y f eder alri gh tat i ss ue i n the parol e c on t exti s proce du ra l , and the on l y proper i nq ui ryi s w hat p r o c e s s th e in m a te r e c e iv e d , n o t w h e th e rth e s ta te c o u rt d e c id e dth e c a s e c o rr e c tly . Se e Sw ar thout , 13 1 S . C t . at86 3. B ec ause B enson rai se s no feder alprocedural c ha l l e nge s , w e va c a t e a nd r e m a nd. W e de c l i ne t o a ddr e s s , i n the f i r s ti ns t anc e , B e ns on’ s c ont e nt i on tha tthe B oard of P ar ol e’ s det erm i nat i on thathe w as un sui t abl e f or parol e w as an arbi trary d e p r iv a tio n o f

h is lib e rtyin te r e s t. See O sb o rn e v. D ist. A t to rn ey’s O f f i ce f o r T h i rd J u d ic ia l D is t. , 42 3 F . 3d 10 50 , 10 55 -56 (9th C i r. 20 05 ). V AC AT E D a n d RE MAND E D.
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6159 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6159

**Commission Decision of 15/04/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6159 - WARBURG PINCUS / VESTAR / TRITON CONTAINER INTERNATIONAL) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 15.4.2011

C(2011) 2819 final

PUBLIC VERSION

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6159 - WARBURG PINCUS / VESTAR / TRITON CONTAINER INTERNATIONAL Notification of 14.03.2011 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 14.03.2011 the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Warburg Pincus LLC (“Warburg Pincus”, US) and Vestar Capital Partners (“Vestar”, US) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of the whole of Triton Container International Limited (“Triton”, Bermuda), by way of purchase of shares [2] .

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Warburg Pincus is a private equity investor headquartered in the United States. Its portfolio companies are active in a variety of sectors.

- Vestar is a private equity investor headquartered in the United States. Its portfolio companies are active in a variety of sectors.

- Triton is an international maritime cargo container leasing company headquartered in Bermuda, with its main operating offices in London and San Francisco. It is active worldwide in the leasing of maritime containers to maritime shipping companies.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(Signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 088, 19.03.2011, p. 33

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Christian Lown, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all
          reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-7 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic
          reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
          respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution,
          servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
          statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration
          agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with
          servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation
          AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on
          Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
 [Signature Page Follows]
 
 
 Date:  March 29, 2019/s/ CHRISTIAN LOWNChristian LownPresident and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)Navient Funding, LLC
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-4381 Directorate ID: 2015-SW-009-AD

Helicopter Model: 

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 23 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent the failure of the external life raft to 

deploy, possibly preventing the evacuation of passengers during an emergency.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $50

Labor per Helicopter

(4 work hours X $85 for 

inspection)

$340

Other

(Explain)

TotalCostperHelicopter $390

Total US Fleet Cost $8,970

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: David Hatfield
**UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD ANN ARBOR, MI 48105 - 2498
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION July 21 , 2011 MEMORANDUM SUBJECT: Meeting with Oshkosh and Pierce FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer TO: Docket EPA - HQ - OAR - 2010 - 0162 This memorandum documents a meeting held on April 28 , 2011 b etween Oshkosh, Pierce, DOT and EPA staff. The following people attended : Oshkosh: Roger Lackore Pierce: Mike Power DOT: Coralie Cooper, Maurice Hicks EPA: By ron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Chery l By num, and Angela Cullen The discussion focused on the following:  Utility

needs of fire trucks  Tires used on fire trucks  Airport Rescue Fire Fighting vehicles  Needs of other vocational vehicles such as concrete mixers, refuse haulers, recovery vehicles, snow plows, and emergency vehicles  Exemptions for exports
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24000]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 415 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-778, K2024-71.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24000 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


         This Certificate is being delivered pursuant to the requirements of
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 (Mail Fraud) of Title 18 (Crimes and Criminal
Procedures) of the United States Code and shall not be relied on by any person
for any other purpose.

         The undersigned, who is the Chief Executive Officer of S1 Corporation
(the "Company"), hereby certifies as follows:

         To the knowledge of the undersigned, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
of the Company (the "Report"), which accompanies this Certificate, fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and all information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

         Dated this 15th day of March 2004.



                               /S/ JAIME W. ELLERTSON
                               --------------------------------------------
                               Jaime W. Ellertson, Chief Executive Officer
### TEXA S C OU R T OF A PPEAL S, THIR D DIST R ICT , AT AU STIN NO. 03-0 7 -00 277 -CR

M ic hae l A nt honyCa st e llo , A ppe lla nt

v . The State of Texas, App ellee
F ROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF TRAVIS COUNTY , 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1- DC-07 -90 4026 , HO NORAB LE B RENDA KENNEDY , JUDGE PRESIDI NG

M E M O R

A N D U M O P I N I O N A jury found appe llant Michael Anthony Castello guilty

of murder . SeeTex. P enal Cod e Ann. § 1 9. 02 (We st 2 00 3) . T he jur y a sse sse d p un ishme nt at si xty y e ars ’ i mpr iso nme nt. Ap pell ant’ s c ourt -a

pp ointe d atto rn e y

fi le d a br ie f c on c lud ingthat th e a pp e a l is frivolous and without m er i t . The brie f mee ts the require ments of An de rs v . Ca lif or nia , 3 86 U. S. 738 (1967), by

prese nting a

profe ssional evaluation of the rec ord de monstrating why there are no ar gu ab l e grounds to be a dvance d. Se e als o Pe ns on v . O hio , 4 88 U. S. 7 5 ( 19 88 ); H i g h v . S tate , 57 3 S. W.2 d 8 07 (T e x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 78 ); Cur riev . S tate , 516 S.W .2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); J ac k so n v . S tate , 4 85 S.W. 2d

55 3 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 72 ); Ga ino us v . S tate , 436 S . W . 2 d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant re ceive d a copy of counsel’s brief and was a dvised of his rig ht to examine the appellate r ecor d and to file a pro se br ief. No pr o se brief has bee n filed.2 We have r eviewe d the re cord a nd counsel’s br ief a

nd ag ree that the a

p p e a l is frivolous and wi tho ut m e ri t. We fi nd

no thi ngin t

he re c or d th a t mi g ht a

rgua bly su pp or t th e a pp e a l. The judg ment of convic tion is affirmed.

__________________________________________ G. Alan Waldrop, Just ice Be fore Chief J ustice L aw, Justi ces Pembe rton and Waldrop Affir med Filed: F ebrua

ry 21, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 17-2007 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      13, 2008
##### 



Certification of the Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934;(2)
    
    The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of
the Company.
 /s/ Robert GiambroneRobert GiambroneChief Financial Officer  
 *
    
    The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as
a separate disclosure document.
United States Office of Personnel Management

Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 24-303 Date: January 2024 

Subject: 2024 FEHB Withholdings and Contributions

The official Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program withholdings

and contribution rates for 2024 are available on the OPM website. Agency payroll 

providers should exclusively use these rates to update their systems. 

The rates are effective for pay periods beginning in calendar year 2024. These rates are 

now Public Use Files (PUFs). The purpose of the Public Use Files is to provide 

information to the public on FEHB and Federal Employees Dental and Vision 

Insurance Program plans, including information on rates and benefits. 

Please visit the OPM’s Health and Insurance website for more information. 

If you have questions about this letter, please send an email to 

FinancialBALs@opm.gov. We look forward to assisting you.

Additional Information

For questions regarding the information in this Benefit Administration Letter (BAL), 

please contact the Benefits Officers Development and Outreach group at 

benefits@opm.gov or call (202) 606-0788.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for International Science and Engineering; 
Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for International 
Science and Engineering (25104).
    Date and Time: November 13, 2024; 10 a.m.-4 p.m. (Eastern).
    Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Virtual).
    To attend the virtual meeting, all visitors must register at least 
48 hours prior to the meeting at the following Zoom link:

https://nsf.zoomgov.com/webinar/register/WN_hunGxVDLSCms-KxtzwZ0Lw
Webinar ID: 161 334 4374; Passcode: 205871

    The final agenda for the meeting will be posted on the OISE 
Advisory Committee website at: https://www.nsf.gov/od/oise/advisory.jsp.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Persons: Elena Hillenburg, National Science Foundation, 
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-2993.
    Summary of Minutes: Minutes and meeting materials will be available 
on the OISE Advisory Committee website at https://www.nsf.gov/od/oise/advisory.jsp or can be obtained from the contact person listed above.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations and counsel 
on major goals and policies pertaining to international science and 
engineering programs and activities.

Agenda

November 13, 2024; 10 a.m.-4 p.m.

10:00 a.m.-10:15 a.m. Call to Order, Opening Remarks, Introductions
10:15 a.m.-10:45 a.m. OISE Remarks; COI Briefing, OISE Overview
10:45 a.m.-11:30 a.m. Countries & Regions, Programs & Analysis, 
Multilateral Collaborations
11:30 a.m.-12:00 p.m. Lunch Break
12:00 p.m.-12:15 p.m. Global Centers
12:15 p.m.-12:30 p.m. IMPRESS-U
12:30 p.m.-12:45 p.m. AI-ENGAGE
12:45 p.m.-1:00 p.m. Break/Focus Time
1:00 p.m.-1:45 p.m. Subcommittee Formation
1:45 p.m.-2:00 p.m. Break/Focus Time
2:00 p.m.-2:45 p.m. Preparation for Meeting with NSF Chief Science 
Officer
2:45 p.m.-3:15 p.m. Meeting with NSF Chief Science Officer
3:15 p.m.-4:00 p.m. Final Discussion, Next AC Scheduling & Planning
4:00 p.m. Adjourn

    Dated: October 11, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-24060 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
---

|CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER             
|---------------------------------------------------------
|PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lake Victoria Mining
Company, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the three month period ended June
30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, David Kalenuik, President and Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended; and           
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: August 14, 2012 | By:                                         | /s/ David Kalenuik
|---------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------
|                       | David Kalenuik                             
|                       | President and Chief
      Executive Officer
|                       | (Principal Executive
      Officer)        

This Certification is being furnished pursuant to Rule 15(d)
and shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of
that section. This Certification shall not be deemed incorporated by reference
into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by
reference.

---