alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2933 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2933

   To amend provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 relating to 
    remedial action of active uranium and thorium processing sites.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 26, 2000

  Mr. Nickles introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend provisions of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 relating to 
    remedial action of active uranium and thorium processing sites.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REMEDIAL ACTION AT ACTIVE URANIUM AND THORIUM PROCESSING 
              SITES.

    Section 1001(b) of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (42 U.S.C. 
2296a(b)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1)(B)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``2002'' and 
                inserting ``2007''; and
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``placed in escrow 
                not later than December 31, 2002,'' and inserting 
                ``incurred by a licensee after December 31, 2007,''; 
                and
            (2) in paragraph (2)(E)(i), by striking ``July 31, 2005'' 
        and inserting ``December 31, 2008''.
                                 <all>
```
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2843

For the relief of Antonio Costa.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 10, 2000

Mr. BREAUX introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Antonio Costa.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ANTONIO

4 COSTA.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Antonio Costa shall be eligible for issuance of an im8 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

12 permanent resident.
2

•S 2843 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Antonio Costa en2 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified

3 in subsection (c), the alien shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible,

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of en7 actment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

12 fees within 2 years after the date of enactment of this

13 Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Antonio Costa, the Secretary of State shall in17 struct the proper officer to reduce by the appropriate num18 ber, during the current or next following fiscal year, the

19 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

20 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

21 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, if appli22 cable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

23 available to natives of the country of the alien’s birth

24 under section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
OPM.gov / Telework / TMO and Coordinators / Performance Management 

# Performance Management

Performance management is the systematic process by which an agency involves its employees, as individuals and members of a group, in improving organizational effectiveness in the accomplishment of agency mission and goals. Effective performance management is important to the success of the telework program. The Telework Enhancement Act (external link) (PDF file) (the Act) specifies in Section 6502(b)(3) that an agency's telework policy shall "provide that an employee may not be authorized to telework if the performance of that employee does not comply with the terms of the written agreement between the agency manager and that employee." When agencies make decisions regarding telework eligibility and participation, sound business and performance management principles must be considered, consistent with the requirements of the Act.

When implementing the telework program, managers should keep in mind that performance standards for teleworking employees must be the same as performance standards for non-teleworking employees.The relevant language in the Act is as follows:

*Teleworkers and non-teleworkers are treated the same for purposes of: 1)**periodic appraisals of job performance of employees; 2)**training, rewarding, reassigning promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees; 3)**work requirements; 4)**other acts involving managerial discretion.*

Also, management expectations for performance should be clearly addressed in an employee's performance plan, regardless of whether or not the employee is a teleworker. When an employee participates in telework, expectations related to accountability do not differ by virtue of the telework arrangement. Following clear and consistent performance management principles and techniques should result in a seamless transition for managers and their employees moving to telework arrangements. 

Skip to main content

### In this section

- Telework Training
- TMO and Coordinators Toggle submenu   - Building a Telework Program 
  - Leading Change 
  - Pay, Leave, & Work Schedules
  - Agency Closure
  - Performance Management 
  - Official Worksite
  - Overseas Telework
  - Reasonable Accommodations
  - Emergency Telework 
  - Recruitment & Retention
  - Security & IT
  - Mail Management
  - Dependent Care
  - Agency Roles
- Managing Teleworkers Toggle submenu   - Telework Basics
  - Results-Oriented Management
  - Work Schedules
  - Emergency Planning
  - Assessing Job Tasks
- History, Legislation, & Reports
- Telework Employees Toggle submenu   - Telework Basics
  - Employee Eligibility
  - Emergency Planning
  - Work Schedules
  - Telework Etiquette Quick Tips
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ MATTHEW A. JONESName:
    
    Matthew A. JonesTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner
EX-4.1



 Exhibit 4.1 
  

	
	





 AVOLON HOLDINGS LIMITED Number 00[] Common Shares -[]- Incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands Share capital is US$[] divided
into [] Common Shares of a par value of US$[] per share THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT [INSERT NAME OF COMPANY] is the registered holder of [INSERT NUMBER] Common Shares in the above-named Company subject to the Memorandum and Articles of Association
thereof. EXECUTED on behalf of the said Company on the [] day of [] 201[ ] by: DIRECTOR Goes 740 all rights reserved litho. In U.S.A
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Xinde Technology Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:




1.           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date: May 13, 2011
By:
/s/ Dianjun LiuName:
Dianjun LiuTitle:
President, Chief Executive Officer and PrincipalExecutive Officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company will be retained by the Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Supplemental
Indenture sociedad anónima de
capital variable Issuer New First Priority Guarantor Trustee Indenture
 W I T N E S S E T H :
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 First Priority Guarantees
 Trustee
 Effect on Indenture
 Counterparts
 Governing Law




---



##### 



SATÉLITES MEXICANOS, S.A. DE C.V.By:
    /s/ LUIS STEINName:
    Luis SteinTitle:
    CFOBy:
    /s/ GUILLERMO REYESName:
    Guillermo ReyesTitle:
    Director of FinanceALTERNATV CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ LUIS STEINName:
    Luis SteinTitle:
    CFOBy:
    /s/ OCTAVIO LECONAName:
    Octavio LeconaTitle:
    Vice President for Legal Affairs and
SecretaryHSBC Bank USA, National AssociationBy:
    /s/ JOSEPH A. LLORETName:
    Joseph A. LloretTitle:
    Assistant Vice President Signature Page to the First Priority Supplemental Indenture
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             9881
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          1471
<OTHER-SE>                                      (11352)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 10869
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (10869)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (10869)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 17

- 00065

- CR

THOMAS RANDAZZO, Appellant
V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 336th District Court Fannin County, Texas Trial Court No. CR

- 15

- 25590

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 O R D E R Court reporter Charla Reamy recorded the trial court proceedings in appellate cause

nu mber 06

- 17

- 00065

- CR, styled Thomas Randazzo v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number
CR

- 15

- 25590 , in the 336th Judicial District Court of Fannin County, Texas. Thomas Randazzo has requested a copy of that record. Prior to releasing volume six of the reporter’s record, we asked Reamy to redact sensitive data from that portion of the record. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10. Reamy has respectfully declined our request to redact the sensitive data. Under Rule 9.10, sensiti ve data includes (1) a driver’s license number, passport number, social security number, tax identification number or similar government

- issued personal identification number; (2) [a] bank account number, credit card number, and other financial account nu mber; [and] (3) a birth date, a home address, and the name of any person who was a minor at the time the offense was committed.
T EX
. R. A PP . 9.10(a). Rule 9.10(b) states, “Unless a court orders otherwise, an electronic or paper filing with the court, including the contents of any appendices, must not contain sensitive data.” Further, “[t]he filing of a document constitutes a certification b y the filer that the document complies with paragraphs (a) and (b) of this rule.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P . 9.10(e). Having determined that volume six of the reporter’s record contains sensitive data, we hereby ORDER Reamy to redact any and all sensitive data, a s that phrase is defined by Rule 9.10, from volume six. 1

1 Volume six of the reporter’s record is an exhibit volume. This order does not require redaction of original exhibits. In accordance with Rule 9.10(d), “Sensitive data must be redacted by using the letter “X” in place of each omitted3 The redacted volume six of the reporter’s record is to be received no later than Thursday, November 1. If the redacted reporter’s record is not received by November 1, we warn Reamy that we may beg in contempt proceedings and order her to show cause why she should not be held in contempt of this Cour t for failing to obey its order

. IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT
Date: October 17, 2018

digit or character or by removing the sensitive data in a manner indicating that the data has been redacted.” T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 9.10(d).
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83915]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24012]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 427 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-11, K2025-11.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24012 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
United Realty Trust Incorporated 10-Q 


Exhibit 4.7


 


UNITED
REALTY CAPITAL OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.


 


ISSUANCE
OF ADDITIONAL PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS


 


 


WHEREAS,
United Realty Trust Incorporated (the “General Partner”) as the General Partner of United Realty Capital Operating
Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”), has the right pursuant to Section 4.3 of the Agreement of Limited Partnership
of the Partnership dated as August 12, 2012, as amended (the “Partnership Agreement”) to issue additional Partnership
Interests in the form of Partnership Units in one or series or classes; and


 


WHEREAS,
in connection with the Partnership’s acquisition of a property located at 945 82nd Parkway, Myrtle Beach, South
Carolina (the “Property”), the General Partner desires to issue to IRA Services Trust Company, f/b/o Gerald Robert
Kostner (“Limited Partner”), a newly created class MB Partnership Unit (the “Class MB Partnership Unit”).


 


NOW
THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:


 


		1.	Unless
                                         otherwise defined herein, all initially capitalized terms shall have the definition set
                                         forth in the Partnership Agreement.



 


		2.	The
                                         Capital Contribution for the MB Partnership Unit shall be Five Hundred Fifty Thousand
                                         Dollars ($550,000).



 


		3.	Effective
                                         upon the acquisition of the Property by the Partnership, the holder of the Class MB Partnership
                                         Unit shall be entitled to an annualized return of ten percent (10%) on the amount of
                                         the Capital Contribution related to the MB Partnership Unit, payable at the same time
                                         as distributions are made to other Limited Partners.



 


		4.	On
                                         the date that is 12 months from the acquisition of the Property (the “Exercise
                                         Date”), the General Partner shall redeem the MB Partnership Unit at par. If the
                                         Property is not acquired by the Partnership, the Capital Contribution will be returned
                                         no later than June 2, 2014, together with reasonable costs incurred by the Limited Partner
                                         in connection with the transfer of the funds.



 


UNITED
REALTY CAPITAL OPERATING PARTNERSHIP, L.P.


 


By:
United Realty Trust Incorporated


 


 


	 /s/
    Jacob Frydman	 	 /s/
    Geral Kostner 
	By:  Jacob
    Frydman 	 	Gerald Kostner
	Title:  Chief
    Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Purden Lake Resource Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lisa Lopomo, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of February, 2009.


/s/ Lisa Lopomo
---------------------------------
Principal Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2945

For the relief of David Bale.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of David Bale.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DAVID

4 BALE.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, David Bale shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

12 permanent resident.
2

•S 2945 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If David Bale en2 tered the United States before the filing deadline specified

3 in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered

4 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be

5 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the

6 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en7 actment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

12 fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this

13 Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to David Bale, the Secretary of State shall instruct

17 the proper officer to reduce by one, during the current

18 or next following fiscal year, the total number of immi19 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun20 try of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immi21 gration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total

22 number of immigrant visas that are made available to na23 tives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

24 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
# L_2018202DE.01001301.xml

| 9.8.2018 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 202/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2018

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 202/13

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1178/2011 der Kommission vom 3. November 2011 zur Festlegung technischer Vorschriften und von Verwaltungsverfahren in Bezug auf das fliegende Personal in der Zivilluftfahrt gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 216/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 311 vom 25. November 2011
  )

Seite 169, Anhang III Abschnitt A Nummer 2 Absatz 2 Satz 1:

Anstatt:

„Dieser Zeitraum kann von der zuständigen Behörde, die die Gültigerklärung erteilt hat, nur einmal verlängert werden, wenn der Pilot während des Gültigkeitszeitraums eine Ausbildung für die Erteilung einer Lizenz gemäß Teil-FCL beantragt oder begonnen hat.“

muss es heißen:

„Dieser Zeitraum kann von der zuständigen Behörde, die die Gültigerklärung erteilt hat, nur einmal verlängert werden, wenn der Pilot während des Gültigkeitszeitraums die Erteilung einer Lizenz gemäß Teil-FCL beantragt hat oder sich in Ausbildung für die Erteilung einer Lizenz gemäß Teil-FCL befindet.“

---