alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 2, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 372 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-12, K2025-12.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-23997 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# L_2012077EN.01001701.xml

| 16.3.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 77/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 77/17

---

EUROPEAN COUNCIL DECISION

of 1 March 2012

electing the President of the European Council

(2012/151/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL,

Having regard to the Treaty on European Union, and in particular Article 15(5) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 1 December 2009, by European Council Decision 2009/879/EU (1), Mr Herman VAN ROMPUY was elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2009 until 31 May 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 1 December 2009, by European Council Decision 2009/879/EU (1), Mr Herman VAN ROMPUY was elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 December 2009 until 31 May 2012.

| (2) | In accordance with the Treaty, the holder of the office of President of the European Council may be re-elected once, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

In accordance with the Treaty, the holder of the office of President of the European Council may be re-elected once,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Mr Herman VAN ROMPUY is hereby re-elected President of the European Council for the period from 1 June 2012 until 30 November 2014.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Mr Herman VAN ROMPUY by the Secretary-General of the Council.

It shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 1 March 2012.

For the European Council

The President

H. VAN ROMPUY

---

(1)  
  OJ L 315, 2.12.2009, p. 48.

1

---
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 272

To designate the Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in Oakland,

California, as the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1999

Mrs. BOXER (for herself and Mrs. FEINSTEIN) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and

Public Works

A BILL

To designate the Federal building located at 1301 Clay

Street in Oakland, California, as the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums

Federal Building’’.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF RONALD V. DELLUMS FED4 ERAL BUILDING.

5 The Federal building located at 1301 Clay Street in

6 Oakland, California, shall be known and designated as the

7 ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.
2

•S 272 IS

1 SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

2 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document,

3 paper, or other record of the United States to the Federal

4 building referred to in section 1 shall be deemed to be

5 a reference to the ‘‘Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building’’.

Æ
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Tony Harrison, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SKREEM Records Corp.



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated: May 16, 2008



|    |                                      
|--- | -------------------------------------
|    |                                      
|By: | /s/ Tony Harrison                    
|    | Tony Harrison
Chief Executive Officer
|   
|    |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2959 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2959

To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 27, 2000

  Mr. DeWine introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act of 1992, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE AND REFERENCE TO DAYTON AVIATION HERITAGE 
              PRESERVATION ACT OF 1992.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Dayton Aviation 
Heritage Preservation Amendments Act of 2000''.
    (b) Reference to Dayton Aviation Heritage Preservation Act.--In 
this Act, the term ``Act'' means the Dayton Aviation Heritage 
Preservation Act of 1992 (Public Law 102-419; 16 U.S.C. 410ww).

SEC. 2. REVISIONS TO THE ACT.

    (a) Area Included.--Section 101(b) of the Act (16 U.S.C. 410ww) is 
amended to read as follows:
    ``(b) Area Included.--The park shall consist of the following 
sites, as generally depicted on a map entitled `Dayton Aviation 
Heritage National Historical Park', numbered ____ and dated ____:
            ``(1) A core parcel in Dayton, Ohio, which shall consist of 
        The Wright Cycle Company building, Hoover Block, and lands 
        between.
            ``(2) The Setzer building property (also known as the 
        Aviation Trail building property) Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(3) The residential properties at 26 South Williams 
        Street and at 30 South Williams Street, Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(4) Huffman Prairie Flying Field, Wright-Patterson Air 
        Force Base, Ohio.
            ``(5) The Wright 1905 Flyer III and Wright Hall, including 
        constructed additions and attached structures, known 
        collectively as the John W. Berry, Sr. Wright Brothers Aviation 
        Center, Dayton, Ohio.
            ``(6) The Paul Laurence Dunbar State Memorial, Dayton, 
        Ohio.''.
    (b) Coordination Between Secretary of Defense and Secretary of 
Interior.--Section 107 of the Act (16 U.S.C. 410ww-6) is amended by 
striking ``Secretary of Interior.'' and inserting ``Secretary of the 
Interior.''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 109 of the Act (16 
U.S.C. 410ww-8) is amended by striking the colon after ``title'' and 
all that follows through the end of the sentence and inserting a 
period.
                                 <all>
```
"4%*. 

f&j UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

REGION IX % 

%%PBJ 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 941 05 

January 9,2 

Patricia S. Mariella, Ph.D. 

Executive Director 

Department of Environmental Quality 

Gila River Indian Community 

Post Office Box 97 

Sacaton, AZ 85247 

This is i&sponse to your letter of April 20, 2001, requesting that EPA recognize the 

Community's ability to issue permits that are practicably enforceable to limit a permittee's 

potential emissions. After reviewing this case and discussing the facts with EPA Headquarters, 

and after many years of working closely with the Gila River Department of Environmental 

Quality, we agree that the Community has the capacity to provide enforceable limits. 

As you know, EPA's existing Potential to Emit (PTE) Transition Policy for Part 71 

Implementation in Indian Country (memo dated March 7, 1999) requires an EPA-approved Clean 

Air Act program such as a Tribal Implementation Plan (TIP) in order to create synthetic minor 

sources. Meanwhile, EPA policy allows states (memo dated July 10, 1998) to limit PTE using 

programs that are not federally enforceable, such as state-on1 y permit programs. 

You point out in your letter that the Community has a mature environmental program and tribal 

court system, that you have been conducting environmental inspections and enforcement for 

years, including issuing NOVs and collecting penalties, and that your capacity in this area rivals 

many local air pollution control agencies. We are also aware that you are developing a 

comprehensive TIP. Your letter argued that the Gila River Indian Community should be able to 

operate under the state PTE policy, and we agree. 

Therefore, in the future when your program intends to provide synthetic minor status to a specific 

source on the Reservation, please submit the following: 

- updated information about your tribal court system and enforcement program; 

- detailed information about the source; and 

- copies of the applicable regulations andlor permit. 

EPA will review the documentation and work with your staff to ensure that you have provided 

sufficient justification, in this case, for EPA to recognize a tribal PTE limit that does not stem 

from an EPA-approved program. 
Thank you for your patience. We look forward to continuing our productive relationship as we 

work together to protect tribal air resources. If you have any questions, please call Gerardo Rios, 

Air Pennits Office Chief, at 415-972-3974, or Doug McDaniel, Air Division Tribal Team 

Leader, at 415-947-4106. 

Sincerely, 

Air Division 

J Daniel Blair, GRIC DEQ
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Russell Schechter, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 17, 2010  /s/ Russell Schechter Russell Schechter President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 357 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 27, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations 

AN ACT 

To amend the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 

to expand the training for Federal Government personnel 

related to trafficking in persons, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 357 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Human Trafficking 

3 Prevention Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXPANDED TRAINING RELATING TO TRAFFICKING 

5 IN PERSONS. 

6 Section 105(c)(4) of the Trafficking Victims Protec7 tion Act of 2000 (22 U.S.C. 7105(c)(4)) is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘, including members of the 

9 Service (as such term is defined in section 103 of 

10 the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 U.S.C. 3903))’’ 

11 after ‘‘Department of State’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘Train13 ing under this paragraph shall include, at a min14 imum, the following: 

15 ‘‘(A) A distance learning course on traf16 ficking-in-persons issues and the Department of 

17 State’s obligations under this Act, targeted for 

18 embassy reporting officers, regional bureaus’ 

19 trafficking-in-persons coordinators, and their 

20 superiors. 

21 ‘‘(B) Specific trafficking-in-persons brief22 ings for all ambassadors and deputy chiefs of 

23 mission before such individuals depart for their 

24 posts. 

25 ‘‘(C) At least annual reminders to all such 

26 personnel, including appropriate personnel from 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 357 RFS

1 other Federal departments and agencies, at 

2 each diplomatic or consular post of the Depart3 ment of State located outside the United States 

4 of key problems, threats, methods, and warning 

5 signs of trafficking in persons specific to the 

6 country or jurisdiction in which each such post 

7 is located, and appropriate procedures to report 

8 information that any such personnel may ac9 quire about possible cases of trafficking in per10 sons.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 26, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
exhibit 106q22014




FOURTH AMENDMENT TO 
PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT


THIS FOURTH AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT (“First Amendment”), dated as of July 11, 2014, is entered into by and between HOOPER HOLMES, INC. (“Seller”), and MCELROY DEUTSCH MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP (“Purchaser”), with reference to the following facts:


A.Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of May 13, 2014 as amended by a First Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated June 12, 2014, a Second Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 1, 2014 and a Third Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 7, 2014 (collectively the “Purchase Agreement”) for the sale of the Property, as more particularly described in the Purchase Agreement.


B.Seller and Purchaser now desire to amend the Purchase Agreement in certain respects, as provided for hereinbelow.  Capitalized terms not defined herein have the meanings specified in the Purchase Agreement.


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree as follows:


1.Amendments to Purchase Agreement.  The Purchase Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


a.End of the Inspection Period.  Seller and Purchaser agree Section 1.7 of the Purchase Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: End of the Inspection Period shall mean 5:00 p.m. New Jersey time on July 18, 2014.
b.Closing Date.  Seller and Purchaser agree Section 5.2 of the Purchase Agreement shall be amended to read as follows:  The Closing Date shall occur five (5) days after the End of the Inspection Period but no later than August 8, 2014.


2.Successor and Assigns.  This Fourth Amendment shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.


3.Counterparts.  This Fourth Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts each of which is deemed an original but together constitute one and the same instrument.  Signatures sent via facsimile or electronic mail, including but not limited to signatures in the form of PDF files, scanned images, etc., shall constitute original signatures for the purposes of this Agreement.


4.Status of Purchase Agreement.  Except as specifically amended by this Fourth Amendment, the Purchase Agreement remains unchanged and, as amended by this Fourth Amendment, the Purchase Agreement is in full force and effect.
    

1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this Fourth Amendment as of the date first above written.


	
		
	SELLER:
	HOOPER HOLMES, INC.

	 
	



By:     /s/ Tom Collins     
Name: Tom Collins
Title: SVP & CFO









	PURCHASER:
	MCELROY DEUTSCH MULVANEY & CARPENTER, LLP


/s/ Edward B. Deutsch
                         
Name: 
Title: 







2
#### Barth, Appellant, vs. Milwaukee Automobile Insurance Company Limited, Mutual, Respondent.

*November 11*

December *7, 1954.*

*336For the appellant the case was submitted on the brief of *Arnold C. Otto*of Milwaukee.

*337For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by *D. J. Regan*of Milwaukee.

Gehl, J.

The facts as we have stated them are practically without dispute. The only conflict in the testimony is in that which refers to plaintiff’s position in or outside the crosswalk when she was struck. Under the rule that we must view the evidence in a light most favorable to her, we must assume that she was within the limits of the crosswalk. That fact is immaterial, however, if she has failed to establish that Nutt was guilty of causal negligence.

The question in this case is whether the operation of pushing the Weller car was so completed before the accident as to leave with each of the parties, Weller and Nutt, his individual and independent duty to drive carefully. *Krueger v. Shufeldt,*253 Wis. 192, 33 N. W. (2d) 227. Weller could not be found after the accident and, therefore, was not available to testify. There is, therefore, no testimony to indicate whether his car proceeded forward under its own power or was driven forward by momentum after it was given the single push by Nutt’s car. The undisputed fact is that Weller proceeded forward a distance of approximately 60 feet to the northwest corner of the intersection and then turned west independently of and without any contact with the Nutt car. It does not appear that after Nutt pushed the Weller car he exercised or could have exercised any control over the movement of the Weller car. The injuries sustained by the plaintiff were not in any sense established as the result of the shove which Nutt gave the Weller car.

An action for damages on the ground of negligence depends on failure of duty of the defendant — failure to exercise ordinary care. There is no evidence in this case to establish any such fault on the part of Nutt.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of North Penn Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending
March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Frederick L. Hickman, President and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
              
              May 14, 2009
              
              /s/
      Frederick L. HickmanFrederick
      L. HickmanPresident
      and Chief Executive
Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markm an Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_________________________________________ Clerk November 20, 2012

p1113 

# Order

November 20, 2012

145647

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 145647

COA: 309982

St. Clair CC: 11

- 001490

- FC

DARYL LAVERN ZIMMER,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 20, 2012 order

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.