alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7665

JAMES A. BUTLER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MARK A. HENRY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-98-1810-WMN) Submitted: February 11, 1999 Decided: February 25, 1999 Before ERVIN, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James A. Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Albert David Copperthite, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* Although the district court’s order is marked as “filed” on October 27, 1998, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on October 28, 1998. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, it is the date that the order was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effecive date of the district court’s decision. Wilson v. Murray, 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 PER CURIAM: James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Butler v. Henry , No. CA-98-1810-WMN (D. Md. Oct. 28, 1998). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 

Television Set On Mode Testing: 

Effect of Video Signal Input 

February 2013 

Department of Energy 

Energy Efficiency and 

Renewable Energy 
2 

Testing Overview 

• During round robin testing DOE observed that: 

– Some TVs designate each input terminal (e.g., HDMI 1, 2, and 3) for 

specific uses (e.g., cable, DVD player, game console) 

– Each input has different default settings, tailored to the needs of the 

specific use for which the input is designated 

• DOE performed on mode testing to determine if using a 

different input terminal affects power consumption 
3 

Testing 

• TV stabilization and setup: 

– TV stabilized by playing IEC 62087 dynamic video clip for one hour prior 

to testing 

– TV tested with ABC enabled and ambient light held constant during all 

tests 

• Testing performed on one unit using three different input 

terminals 

– HDMI 1 and 2 did not have a specific designation 

– HDMI 3 was specifically designated for use with game consoles 

• On mode test repeated three times for each HDMI input 

terminal 
4 

Results 

On Mode Power Consumption (watts) 

Input 

Terminal Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average 

HDMI 1 95.2 95.4 95.3 95.3 

HDMI 2 96.0 96.5 95.3 95.9 

HDMI 3 101 101 101 101
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2148 Lower Tribunal No. CF20

- 520

_____________________________
J IMMY L. F ORD , J R

. , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County

. Peter F. Estrada , Judge.

June 25, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

WHITE
, MIZE and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Andrea M. Norgard , Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Hurley, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL T IME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of 4th Grade Films,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending  December 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Quarterly
Report"),  we, James Doolin and Shane  Thueson,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Date:02/08/10                   /S/ JAMES DOOLIN
                                --------------------------------------------
                                James Doolin, Principal Financial Officer

Date:02/08/10                   /S/ SHANE THUESON
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Shane Thueson, Principal Executive Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

FEB 7, 2012

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 11-13545 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 0:11-cr-60037-JIC-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ALEXANDER TABORDA BRAVO, 

llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Southern District of Florida

 ________________________

(February 7, 2012)

Before WILSON, PRYOR and KRAVITCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Robin Joy Farnsworth, appointed counsel for Alexander Taborda Bravo, has

filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to
Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Bravo’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 33.2

MANAGEMENTS ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE

Management of the Agency and Trust division of
Citibank, N.A. (or Company) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management has determined that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and
for the period as follows:

Platform: Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student
loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the Platform)

Applicable Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria in regards to the activities performed by the
Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which
management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the Applicable Servicing Criteria).

Period: Twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the Period).

With respect
to the Platform as of and for the Period, the Companys management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| |  |  | The Companys management is responsible for assessing the Companys compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Companys management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management used the criteria
set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to managements assertion of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.



CITIBANK, N.A.By:

/s/ Karen MontbachKaren MontbachIts: Managing Director


Dated: February 28, 2013
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 12, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Bytecode Alliance Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Interuniversitair Micro-Electronica Centrum vzw, Leuven, BELGIUM, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Bytecode Alliance Foundation intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 20, 2022, Bytecode Alliance Foundation filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29379).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 6, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 24, 2024 (89 FR 52509).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-23622 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
PM -20ID-OI'12-

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Nlltjonal Business Ail"l.'raft Association Eli Colti 8/17/09 -

Regionlll Airline Association Dave Lotterer 8117/09

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8/17/09 -

ATA Craig Fabian 8/17/09 -

ATA MLopez 8f17/09 -

09129/06
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 16, 2015

No. 04-15-00312-CV

Luis and Janeth MORENO, individually and on behalf of their daughter GM,

Appellants

v.

Rosa VIDA, Individually,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2015CVT000802 D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The trial court clerk has filed a notification of late record, stating that the appellant has 

failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record and that the 

appellant is not entitled to appeal without paying the fee.

We, therefore, ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of 

the date of this order that either (1) the clerk’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made 

to pay the clerk’s fee; or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the clerk’s fee. If 

appellant fails to respond within the time provided, this appeal will be dismissed for want of 

prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c) (allowing dismissal of 

appeal if appellant fails to comply with an order of this court).

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 16th day of July, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2883

To suspend temporarily the duty on piano plates.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 18, 2000

Mr. LOTT introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To suspend temporarily the duty on piano plates.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PIANO PLATES.

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subchapter II of chapter 99 of

5 the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States is

6 amended by inserting in numerical sequence the following

7 new item:

‘‘ 9902.92.09 Piano plates

(provided for in

subheading

9209.91.80) ....... Free No change No change On or before

12/31/2004 ’’.

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

9 this section shall apply to goods entered, or withdrawn
2

•S 2883 IS

1 from warehouse for consumption, on or after the 15th day

2 after the date of enactment of this Act.

Æ
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

March 29, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice

129871 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DOROTHY N. MALLORY, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman,
Justices

v SC: 129871 COA: 262626 WCAC: 04-000307 MOKA CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 13, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1 ), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that portion of the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission decision affirming the ma gistrate’s finding of the specific loss of plaintiff’s left arm and ha nd, and we REMAND this case to the magistrate for reconsideration of plai ntiff’s specific loss claim in light of Cain v Waste Management, Inc (After Remand), 472 Mich 236 (2005). If the magist rate should find that plaintiff did not demonstrate the specific loss of her left arm and hand, she shall also address whether plaintiff unreasonably refuse d offers of reasonable empl oyment during all relevant periods, up to the time of h earing, when such offers were made—an issue the magistrate categorized as moot because of her orig inal specific loss determination.

We do not retain jurisdiction.

t0322 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

March 29, 2006

Clerk
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 17-2008 (B) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
##### 



NEWS RELEASE
 For further information, contact:
    
    W. Todd Zehnder, Vice President  Corporate Development(337) 232-7028, www.petroquest.com
 PETROQUEST ENERGY ANNOUNCES PRICING OF SERIES B CUMULATIVE
CONVERTIBLE PERPETUAL PREFERRED STOCK OFFERING
       About the Company




---



##### 



Forward-Looking Statements
 Statements regarding the offering, number of Series B preferred shares to be sold, use of
proceeds, continued borrowing under the bank credit facility, the closing date, as well
as any other statements that are not historical facts in this news release are forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended These forward-looking statements
involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, many of which are beyond PetroQuests ability
to control or estimate, and are subject to material changes. Such risks, uncertainties and
assumptions include, but are not limited to, market conditions, managements discretion over the
use of the net proceeds from the offering, customary offering closing conditions, and other factors
detailed in the registration statement relating to these securities and PetroQuests filings with
the SEC. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those indicated. PetroQuest
undertakes no duty to update or revise these forward-looking statements.
ex10_2.htm


Exhibit 10.2


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO PROMISSORY NOTE












Up to $50,000 April 20, 2014







WHEREAS, Silvergraph International, Inc. a Nevada corporation (“Borrower”), and each of the individuals and entities identified and set forth on the signature page hereof (each a “Holder” and collectively the “Holders”), are parties to that certain Promissory Note dated April 26, 2012, in the original principal amount of up to $50,000, as amended on May 31, 2012 (the “Original Note”);







WHEREAS, the Borrower and the Holders desire to amend the Original Note to extend the Maturity Date thereof.







NOW, THEREFORE, for good and adequate consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:







1.           The Maturity Date, as defined in the Original Note, is extended to  December 31, 2015.







2.           As consideration for this Amendment, the outstanding principal balance of each Holder is increased by Ten Dollars ($10.00) effective as of the date hereof.







2.           Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of the Original Note shall remain in full force and effect.







[remainder of page intentionally left blank; signature page to follow]


 




Page 1 of 2





  











  






 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Borrower has executed this First Amendment to Promissory Note as of the date first written above.








	
“Borrower”

	 	  	 
	 	 	 	  	 
	
Silvergraph International, Inc.,

	 	  	 
	a Nevada corporation	 	  	 
	 	 	 	  	 
	/s/ James Simpson	 	  	 
	
By: 

	James Simpson	 	  	 
	
Its:

	President	 	  	 
	 	  	 	  	 
	 	  	 	  	 
	
“Holders”

	 	  	 
	 	 	 	 
	
Matthew Balk

	 	
Jason Adelman


	 	  	 	  	 
	/s/ Matthew Balk	 	/s/ Jason Adelman
	 	 	 	  	 
	 	 	 
	
MKM Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd.

	 	
Robert J. Neborsky and Sandra S. Neborsky Living Trust


	 	  	 	  	 
	/s/ David Skriloff	 	/s/ Robert J. Neborsky
	
By:

	David Skriloff	 	
By:

	Robert J. Neborsky
	
Its:

	Portfolio Manager	 	
Its:

	Trustee
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	  	 	  	 
	
Chad Willis

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Chad Willis	 	 	 





 


 


 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofGreenChek Technology Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended November 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Antoinette Boquiren, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 20thday of January, 2009.

ANTOINETTE BOQUIRENAntoinette BoquirenChief Financial Officer














---