alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 3013

To make technical amendments concerning contracts affecting certain Indian

tribes in Oklahoma, and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

SEPTEMBER 7, 2000

Mr. INHOFE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Indian Affairs

A BILL

To make technical amendments concerning contracts affecting certain Indian tribes in Oklahoma, and for other

purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS CONCERNING THE

4 FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES OF OKLAHOMA.

5 (a) INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION ACT.—Section

6 1(b)(15)(A) of the model agreement set forth in section

7 108(c) of the Indian Self-Determination Act (25 U.S.C.

8 450l(c)) is amended—

9 (1) by striking ‘‘and section 16’’ and inserting

10 ‘‘, section 16’’; and
2

•S 3013 IS

1 (2) by striking ‘‘shall not’’ and inserting ‘‘and

2 the Act of July 3, 1952 (25 U.S.C. 82a), shall not’’.

3 (b) INDIAN SELF-DETERMINATION AND EDUCATION

4 ASSISTANCE ACT.—Section 403(h)(2) of the Indian Self5 Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C.

6 458cc(h)(2)) is amended—

7 (1) by striking ‘‘and section’’ and inserting

8 ‘‘section’’; and

9 (2) by striking ‘‘shall not’’ and inserting ‘‘and

10 the Act of July 3, 1952 (25 U.S.C. 82a), shall not’’.

11 (c) REPEALS.—The following provisions of law are

12 repealed:

13 (1) Section 2106 of the Revised Statutes (25

14 U.S.C. 84).

15 (2) Sections 438 and 439 of title 18, United

16 States Code.

Æ
----

|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | 1.     | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      |
|   | 2.     | the      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                       |   |                                            |   |
|----------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                       | By:    | /s/      Ross J. Prossner                       |   |
|                       |   | Ross      J. Prossner                           |   |
|                       |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer      |
|                       |   |                                            |   |
|                       | By:    | /s/      Lisa M. Jones                          |   |
|                       |   | Lisa      M. Jones                              |   |
|                       |   | Vice-President      and Principal Financial and |
|                       |   | Accounting      Officer                         |   |
|                       |   |                                            |   |
| Date:      August 10, 2009 |   |                                            |   |
**Exhibit
      32.1**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Yongye Biotechnology International, Inc.. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of the Company
      fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of section
      13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
      in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Zishen
                WuZishen
                WuPresident
                and CEODated:
                August 14, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Larry
                GilmoreLarry
                GilmorePrincipal
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 10.23








 






    	1



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	2



    	 



    

 


 


 






    	3



    	 



    

 


 






    	4



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	5



    	 



    

 


 






    	6



    	 



    

 


 


 



    	7



    	 



    

 


 






    	8



    	 



    

 






    	9



    	 



    

 


 


10
1 | Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy eere.energy.gov 

## Television Set On Mode Testing: Effect of Video Signal Input February 2013 Department of Energy Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy2 

## Testing Overview • During round robin testing DOE observed that:

– Some TVs designate each input terminal (e.g., HDMI 1, 2, and 3) for specific uses (e.g., cable, DVD player, game console)

– Each input has different default settings, tailored to the needs of the specific use for which the input is designated 

### • DOE performed on mode testing to determine if using a 

### different input terminal affects power consumption3 

## Testing • TV stabilization and setup:

– TV stabilized by playing IEC 62087 dynamic video clip for one hour prior to testing

– TV tested with ABC enabled and ambient light held constant during all tests 

### • Testing performed on one unit using three different input terminals

– HDMI 1 and 2 did not have a specific designation

– HDMI 3 was specifically designated for use with game consoles 

### • On mode test repeated three times for each HDMI input terminal4 

## Results On Mode Power Consumption (watts)

Input Terminal Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Average HDMI 1 95.2 95.4 95.3 95.3 HDMI 2 96.0 96.5 95.3 95.9 HDMI 3 101 101 101 101
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2764

___________

Thomas Darnell; Mark Rogers, *

 *

Plaintiffs, *

 *

W. Duane Isaac, *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

 *

John Caudill; Don Cornell; Scott E. *

Hope; Jay Masoner; Danny Hahn; *

Kenny Hamilton; Randy D. Offield; *

James Gant; William Miller; Zivian *

Christian; Charlie James; Joseph E. *

Schmidt; James A. Clark; Jason L. * Appeal from the United States

Loomer; Mike Davis; Steve Black; * District Court for the

Chester Parkus; R. Mann; Bradley * Western District of Missouri. 

Bernabe; Theodore F. Lewis; Robert *

Kelly; Michael Donley; Kenneth * [UNPUBLISHED]

Thornburg; James S. Quinn; Craig *

Winfield; Bryan Bland; Rubin *

Pinster; Terrence Lemons; James *

Lutes; James Risner; Robert Shaw; *

Don Wright; James McKee; Robert *

David Hammon; Wilbert M. Tate, *

 *

Plaintiffs, *

 *

v. *

 *

Dora Schriro; George A. Lombardi; *

Dale Riley, *
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri, adopting the report and recommendation of the Honorable William

A. Knox, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

-2-

Defendants, *

 *

Michael Groose; David Dormire; *

Gerald Bommell, *

 *

Defendants-Appellees, *

 *

John Doe, 1-5, *

 *

Defendant. *

___________

 Submitted: August 7, 1998

 Filed: August 14, 1998

___________

Before WOLLMAN, HANSEN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

W. Duane Isaac appeals from the district court&s orders dismissing three prison 1

officials and granting summary judgment as to the remaining prison officials in Isaac&s

conditions-of-confinement suit. After a careful review of the record and the parties&

submissions on appeal, we affirm the judgment of the district court. We also deny

appellees& request to strike portions of appellant&s brief addendum, see Johnson v.

Missouri, 142 F.3d 1087, 1090 n.5 (8th Cir. 1998) (considering material not submitted

to the district court, and denying motion to strike material because information did not

aid appellants& arguments), and appellant&s pending motion filed with this court.
-3-

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# L_2011345EN.01002001.xml

| 29.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 345/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 345/20

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1387/2011

of 14 December 2011

correcting the Finnish, French, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak and Spanish versions of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 318/2006 as regards trade with third countries in the sugar sector

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1) and in particular Article 85 and Article 161(3), in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Following the amendment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 (2), by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1055/2009 (3), it was noted that the Finnish, French, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak and Spanish versions of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 contain an error in Article 7b(3), as regards the starting date for submitting applications for export licences. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Following the amendment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 (2), by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1055/2009 (3), it was noted that the Finnish, French, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak and Spanish versions of Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 contain an error in Article 7b(3), as regards the starting date for submitting applications for export licences.

| (2) | Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Regulation (EC) No 951/2006 should therefore be corrected accordingly.

| (3) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Concerns only the Finnish, French, Hungarian, Italian, Polish, Portuguese, Slovak and Spanish versions.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 14 December 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 178, 1.7.2006, p. 24.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 290, 6.11.2009, p. 64.

3

---
#### RAUSCH v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO.

No. 9294.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

March 21, 1934.

Rehearing Denied April 25, 1934.

Goeth, Webb & Goeth, of San Antonio, for appellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

There is no order in this record showing that appellant gave notice of appeal in open court as required by article 2253, R. S. 1925, as amended by Acts 1927, c. 15, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2253).

Final judgment was rendered herein on June 20, 1933, and on June 21, 1933, appellant filed with the clerk of the trial court the following instrument:

> “Notice of Appeal to Fourth Supreme Judicial District Court.

> “B. C. Rausch v. The Western Union Telegraph Company.

> “Number B — 67496.

> “In the Seventy-third Judicial District Court, County of Bexar, State of Texas.

> “Comes now B. C. Rausch of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas, plaintiff in the above entitled and numbered cause on this the 21st day of June, 1933, A. D. and files notice of appeal to the 4th Supreme Judicial District Court, to the erroneous sustaining of defendant company’s general demurrer on June 20th, 1933, A. D. by‘the 73rd Judicial District Court, to which the plaintiff in open court on the aforesaid date then and there duly excepted.

> • “B. C. Rausch.”

This instrument asserts that appellant is filing notice of appeal and that he excepted to the judgment in open court, but fails to state that notice of appeal was given in open court.

The record must show, either in the final judgment or in some separate court order, that notice of appeal was given in open court. This is necessary to give this court jurisdic-

tion of the cause on appeal Russell v. Koennecke (Tex. Civ. App.) 190 S. W. 253; Western Union Tel. Co. v. O’Keefe, 87 Tex. 423, 28 S. W. 945; McMillen v. White House Lbr. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 149 S. W. 734; Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Parker, 104 Tex. 162, 135 S. W. 369; El Paso & S. W. R. Co. v. Kelley, 99 Tex. 87, 87 S. W. 660; Smithwick v. Kelly, 79 Tex. 564, 15 S. W. 486; Republic Nat. Bank v. Jordan (Tex. Civ. App.) 17 S.W.(2d) 84; Gibson v: Singer Sewing Machine Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 147 S. W. 285; Jones v. Baugh (Tex. Civ. App.) 277 S. W. 1091; Morris v. Auld (Tex. Civ. App.) 255 S. W. 253; R. S. 1925, art. 2253 as amended by Acts *6561927, c. 15, § 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Oiv. St. art. 2253).

The appeal will be dismissed.
KMT 6.30.2014 Exhibit 10.36






                                            
Exhibit 10.36




SCHEDULE OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS WHO HAVE ENTERED INTO THE FORM OF OFFICER'S EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT 10.35.
NAME 
Judith L. Bacchus
Robert J. Clemens
Peter Dragich 
Jeswant Gill
Brian E. Kelly
James M. Kohosek
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2877 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2877

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 17, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
   To authorize the Secretary of the Interior to conduct feasibility 
 studies on water optimization in the Burnt River basin, Malheur River 
       basin, Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin, Oregon.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Burnt, Malheur, Owyhee, and Powder 
River Basin Water Optimization Feasibility Study Act of 2000''.

SEC. 2. STUDY.

    The Secretary of the Interior may conduct feasibility studies on 
water optimization in the Burnt River basin, Malheur River basin, 
Owyhee River basin, and Powder River basin, Oregon.

SEC. 3. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There are authorized to be appropriated such sums as are necessary 
to carry out this Act.

            Passed the Senate October 13 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Filed 9/15/11 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2011 ND 181

Mitchell David Holbach, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20110026

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, Northwest Judicial District, the Honorable John C. McClintock, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

David Duane Dusek, P.O. Box 14145, Grand Forks, N.D. 58208, for petitioner and appellant.

Rozanna Christine Larson, State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee.

Holbach v. State

No. 20110026

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Mitchell Holbach appeals from district court orders denying his application for post-conviction relief under N.D.C.C. ch. 29-32.1.  Holbach filed an application for post-conviction relief challenging the proceedings leading to his July 2006 guilty plea to a charge of stalking.  See State v. Holbach, 2007 ND 114, ¶ 2, 735 N.W.2d 862.  The court granted the State’s request for summary disposition.  Holbach argues the district court erred in summarily denying his application without holding a hearing because he presented evidentiary support for his claims that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, the State failed to disclose “potentially” exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), he was denied the right to counsel during his probation revocation hearing, and he had obtained newly discovered evidence.  Because Holbach failed to meet his burden of raising a genuine issue of material fact to support any of his claims, we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Mary Muehlen Maring

Daniel J. Crothers

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner
Exhibit 4.21
 Amendment No. 1 to Contract No. ILSB-1006-4488
Contract for Launch Services between ILS International Launch Services, Inc. and
Satelites Mexicanos, S.A. DE C.V.
 th ILS International Launch Services, Inc. Satélites Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V. ,
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS,
 NOW THEREFORE
 1.
    
    All capitalized terms used but not otherwise expressly defined herein, shall have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Contract.2.
    
    Paragraph 9.1 is amended to change the name of Contractors Mission Manager and is hereby
replaced with the following Paragraph 9.1:
 Mission Managers.
 Contractors Mission Manager
    
    Customers Mission ManagerName: Russ Prytula,
    
    Name: Jesus Gutierrez,Program Director
    
    Director of EngineeringTelephone: 571.633.7468
    
    Telephone: 52-55 5804 7338Telefax: 571.633.7500
    
    Telefax: 52-55 5804 7304Email: r.prytula@ilslaunch.com
    
    Email: jesus.gutierrez@satmex.com
 ILS International Launch Services PROPRIETARY INFORMATION




---



##### 



3.
    
    Except as expressly modified by this Amendment No. 1, the Contract shall remain in full
force and effect in accordance with its terms and conditions.
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 For Customer
    
    For ContractorSatelites Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V.
    
    ILS International Launch Services, Inc.Signature:
    
    /s/ Patricio Northland
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Carl J. HolubName:
    
    Patricio Northland
    
    Name:
    
    Carl J. HolubTitle:
    
    CEO & Director General
    
    Title:
    
    Director of ContractsDate:
    
    Jan 20th, 2011
    
    Date:
    
    20 January 2011
 ILS International Launch Services PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Exhibit 99.1
 ENCORE ENERGY PARTNERS LP
 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three months ended September 30,
    
    
    Nine months ended September 30,2008
    
    
    2007
    
    
    2008
    
    
    2007Income (loss) before income taxes
    
    $
    96,117
    
    
    $
    (2,820
    )
    
    $
    55,204
    
    
    $
    (3,027
    )Adjustments:Add fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    1,767
    
    
    
    4,873
    
    
    
    5,316
    
    
    
    11,681Rental expense attributable to interest
    
    
    57
    
    
    
    36
    
    
    
    186
    
    
    
    126Total fixed charges
    
    
    1,824
    
    
    
    4,909
    
    
    
    5,502
    
    
    
    11,807Adjusted earnings
    
    $
    97,941
    
    
    $
    2,089
    
    
    $
    60,706
    
    
    $
    8,780Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a)
    
    
    53.7
    
    
    
    0.4
    
    
    
    11.0
    
    
    
    0.7
 
 (a)
    
    For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, earnings as defined were inadequate
to cover fixed charges as defined by $2.8 million and $3.0 million, respectively.
# L_2011076EN.01003801.xml

| 22.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 76/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 76/38

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 274/2011

of 21 March 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Traditional Cumberland Sausage (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Traditional Cumberland Sausage’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the United Kingdom’s application to register the name ‘Traditional Cumberland Sausage’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 March 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 208, 31.7.2010, p. 8.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

UNITED KINGDOM

Traditional Cumberland Sausage (PGI)

---