alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
LOG OF MEETING

DIRECTORATE FOR ENGINEERING SCIENCES

SUBJECT: ASTM Bassinet/Cradle Task Group Meeting

DATE OF MEETING: April 18, 2013

PLACE OF MEETING: Via Conference Call

LOG ENTRY SOURCE: Patricia Edwards

COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Patricia Edwards, Mark Kumagai

NON-COMMISSION ATTENDEES: Contact ASTM for attendee list

SUMMARY OF MEETING:

The removable bassinet bed stability requirement, as last worked on by the task group in 

the summer of 2012 and as proposed in the NPR published in October 2012 was 

discussed. Both versions (the task group latest version and the NPR version) was 

circulated prior to the call. 

Many different issues were raised, including:

1) The visual indicator requirement – why only visual. The task group decided to 

allow for the false lock/latch requirement to be an audible indicator as well as a 

visual one. 

2) The auto-lock provision - ensure that this type of design must still be tested if the 

bassinet can be set up in any unlocked position. The task group felt that reorganizing the requirements and tweaking the wording would be the way to 

handle this issue. 

3) Stands/bases that require the bassinet bed to be properly attached, otherwise they 

collapse to the floor – how to allow for this design. The task group brought up 

examples of stands that are designed to only work when properly set up. This 

would eliminate the hazard being addressed, yet there is nothing in the 

requirement to allow for this design. The suggestion was made to add a sentence 

in the procedure to account for this situation. 

4) Fall hazards – is one being created by some of the requirements? The task group 

discussed if a change to the existing wording is needed to eliminate a fall hazard, 

if a caregiver places the bassinet bed on the stand in an unlocked position. Dave 

Campbell had some suggested wording. The task group discussed whether it was 

needed or not.

5) The definition of conspicuous – does it need to be changed, since it refers to the 

manufacturers recommended use position, and that is not what is being tested? 

The task group felt that the requirement for the false lock/latch indicator should 

be edited, rather than the definition, to ensure an indicator is evaluated correctly.

6) Is the 20 degree angle requirement sufficient to distinguish a non-use condition 

from an inclined sleeper? The task group referred to the incident data in that all of 

those bassinets were flat products, not combination products or inclined sleepers. 
And that in one incident where the bassinet was found to be in a non-use, tilted 

position (apprx. 17 degrees) the caregiver noticed there was something wrong due 

to the angle. 

Bob Crowley agreed to revise the requirement taking into account the task groups 

recommendations and will circulate it for review. The task group will meet again via 

conference call at 10:00am April 25th. 

CPSC staff discussed the timeline for the final rule and that we will be finalizing our 

recommendation language in the month of May.
Order filed March 6, 2014 

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-13-00568-CV

____________

LIZZIE J. LOVALL, INDIVIDUALLY; KEITH L. SHAW; 

INDIVIDUALLY: KENNETH L. YOUNG; INDIVIDUALLY; KIM L. 

SHAW, INDIVIDUALLY, Appellants

V.

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, INDIVIDUALLY, OFFICIALLY AND 

VICARIOUSLY; MAY WALKER, CONSTABLE, PRECINCT 7, 

INDIVIDUALLY; RUTH MCDUGLE, INDIVIDUALLY; DARLA 

TURNER, INDIVIDUALLY; JOHN K. GEORGE, OFFICIALLY, 

INDIVIDUALLY; GOW-MING CHAO, INDIVIDUALLY; ET AL, 

Appellees

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-23410

O R D E R
The notice of appeal in this case was filed June 20, 2013. No clerk’s record 

was filed. To date, the filing fee has not been paid. Appellants claim to be indigent 

because they were deemed indigent in a previous appeal in this court. No evidence 

that appellant has established indigence in this appeal has been filed. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 20.1. On December 5, 2013, this court ordered a hearing in the trial court 

to determine whether appellants are entitled to proceed without advanced payment 

of costs. On January 6, 2014, the trial court held a hearing at which appellant 

Lizzie J. Lovall attended. The trial court determined, based on the evidence at the 

hearing and a review of the record, that appellants failed to set forth or prove any 

allegations sufficient to support proceeding as paupers. Therefore, the court issues 

the following order. 

Appellant is ordered to pay the filing fee to the clerk of this court on or 

before March 21, 2014. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. If appellant fails to timely pay the 

filing fee in accordance with this order, the appeal will be dismissed.

PER CURIAM
Exhibit 31.1



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Justin Martin, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Management Corporation.



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated: May 15, 2009



|    |                                      
|--- | -------------------------------------
|By: | /s/ Justin Martin                    
|    | Justin Martin
Chief Executive Officer
#### TEMPLE v. STATE.

No. 18288.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1936.

A. C. Chrisman, of Cleburne, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Justice.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

In addition to charging appellant with the offense of burglary in the present instance, the indictment alleges that on May 9, 1933, appellant was convicted in the district court of Johnson county of burglary in three cases; that the previous convictions are averred as a basis for a cumulative penalty.

The record is before the court without statement of facts or bills of exception. Appellant entered a plea .of guilty to the offense charged and waived a jury upon the trial of the case.

The motion for new trial presents no-matter justifying reversal or requiring discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Nicholas Galeone, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial MortgageTrust 2012-C4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, U.S. Bank National Association,as Certificate Administrator, U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor,CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the 1000 Harbor BoulevardMortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as Trustee for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as CertificateAdministrator for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian for the 1000 HarborBoulevard Mortgage Loan, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan.

 

Dated: November 6, 2019

 

/s/ Nicholas Galeone

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82634-82635]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23620]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Rust Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 12, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Rust Foundation has filed 
written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the 
Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The 
notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's 
provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual 
damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Accelerant 
Limited, Lower Hutt, NEW ZEALAND; Astral Software Inc., Brooklyn, NY; 
and Zed Industries, Denver, CO, have been added as parties to this 
venture.
    Also, ParaState Labs, Inc., Lewes, DE, has withdrawn as a party to 
this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Rust Foundation intends to file 
additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On April 14, 2022, Rust Foundation filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29384).

[[Page 82635]]

    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 3, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 24, 2024 (89 FR 52509).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-23620 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
**REGULATORY EVALUATION**

**Directorate Identifier: 2012** 

**- NM** 
**- 1**  **84**

**- AD** 

**Executive Order 12866:** Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:** Is the AD significant? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Regulatory Flexibility Act:** Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? YES ( ) explain NO (X) **Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:** This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. I s it appropriate t o include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of transportation? YES ( ) explain NO (X)
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2921 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2921

  To provide for management and leadership training, the provision of 
  assistance and resources for policy analysis, and other appropriate 
    activities in the training of Native American and Alaska Native 
            professionals in health care and public policy.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 25, 2000

Mr. McCain (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To provide for management and leadership training, the provision of 
  assistance and resources for policy analysis, and other appropriate 
    activities in the training of Native American and Alaska Native 
            professionals in health care and public policy.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MORRIS K. UDALL SCHOLARSHIP AND EXCELLENCE IN NATIONAL 
              ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY FOUNDATION.

    (a) Authority.--Section 6(7) of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and 
Excellence in National Environmental and Native American Public Policy 
Act of 1992 (20 U.S.C. 5604(7)) is amended by inserting before the 
semicolon at the end the following: ``, by conducting management and 
leadership training of Native Americans, Alaska Natives, and others 
involved in tribal leadership, providing assistance and resources for 
policy analysis, and carrying out other appropriate activities.''.
    (b) Administrative Provisions.--Section 12(b) of the Morris K. 
Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental and Native 
American Public Policy Act of 1992 (20 U.S.C. 5608(b)) is amended by 
inserting before the period at the end the following: ``and to the 
activities of the Foundation under section 6(7)''.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 13 of the Morris K. 
Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environmental and Native 
American Public Policy Act of 1992 (20 U.S.C. 5609) is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Training of Professionals in Health Care and Public Policy.--
There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out section 6(7) 
$12,300,000 for the 5-year period beginning with the first fiscal year 
that begins after the date of enactment of this subsection.''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended July 31, 2010 of Polar Wireless Corp., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Shane Carroll, Secretary, Principal Financial Officer and Director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





Date: December 3, 2010




/s/ Shane CarrollShane CarrollSecretary, Principal Financial Officer,

and Director
# L_2012120EN.01001401.xml

| 5.5.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 120/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.5.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 120/14

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 2 May 2012

appointing an Austrian alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2012/241/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal from the Austrian Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Josef MARTINZ, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

An alternate member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Josef MARTINZ,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following is hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions as alternate member for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| — | Mr Achill RUMPOLD, Mitglied der Landesregierung des Bundeslandes Kärnten. |
| --- | --- |

—

Mr Achill RUMPOLD, Mitglied der Landesregierung des Bundeslandes Kärnten.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 2 May 2012.

For the Council

The President

M. VESTAGER

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---
II

Calendar No. 852

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2942

[Report No. 106–430]

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain

hydroelectric projects in the State of West Virginia.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. BYRD introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported by Mr. MURKOWSKI, without amendment

A BILL

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction

of certain hydroelectric projects in the State of West

Virginia.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY

4 REGULATORY COMMISSION PROJECT.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period

6 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16
2

S 2942 RS

1 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En2 ergy Regulatory Commission projects numbered 6901,

3 6902, and 7307, the Commission may, at the request of

4 the licensee for each project, respectively, and after rea5 sonable notice, in accordance with the good faith, due dili6 gence, and public interest requirements of that section and

7 the Commission’s procedures under that section, extend

8 the time period during which the licensee is required to

9 commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive

10 2-year periods.

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Subsection (a) takes effect

12 on the date of the expiration of the extension issued by

13 the Commission before the date of the enactment of this

14 Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C.

15 806).

16 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the

17 period required for commencement of construction of any

18 of the projects described in subsection (a) expired before

19 the date of the enactment of this Act—

20 (1) the Commission shall reinstate the license

21 effective as of the date of its expiration; and

22 (2) the first extension authorized under sub23 section (a) shall take effect on the expiration date.

Calendar No. 852

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2942

[Report No. 106–430]

A BILL

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain hydroelectric projects in the

State of West Virginia.

SEPTEMBER 28 (legislative day, SEPTEMBER 22), 2000

Reported without amendment