alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2951

To authorize the Commissioner of Reclamation to conduct a study to investigate opportunities to better manage the water resources in the Salmon

Creek watershed of the upper Columbia River.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. GORTON (for himself and Mrs. MURRAY) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To authorize the Commissioner of Reclamation to conduct

a study to investigate opportunities to better manage

the water resources in the Salmon Creek watershed of

the upper Columbia River.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SALMON CREEK WATERSHED, WASHINGTON,

4 WATER MANAGEMENT STUDY.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Commissioner of Reclama6 tion may conduct a study to investigate the opportunities

7 to better manage the water resources in the Salmon Creek

8 Watershed, a tributary to the Upper Columbia River sys-
2

•S 2951 IS

1 tem, Okanagoan County, Washington, so as to restore and

2 enhance fishery resources (especially the endangered

3 Upper Columbia Spring Chinook and Steelhead), while

4 maintaining or improving the availability of water supplies

5 for irrigation practices vital to the economic well-being of

6 the county.

7 (b) PURPOSE.—The purpose of the study under sub8 section (a) shall be to derive the benefits of and further

9 the objectives of the comprehensive, independent study

10 commissioned by the Confederated Tribes of the Colville

11 Reservation and the Okanagoan Irrigation District, which

12 provides a credible basis for pursuing a course of action

13 to simultaneously achieve fish restoration and improved ir14 rigation conservation and efficiency.

Æ
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ James Powell                                      |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  James Powell                                                |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer |
|  Date:     |  February 1, 2011                                            |
** **

**Exhibit 34.2**

** **

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

The Board ofDirectors

Citibank, N.A.:

 

We have examined management’sassertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank,N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and ExchangeCommission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reporting initially required under the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended) automobile loan or lease-backed securities serviced by American Honda Finance Corporation issuedon or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services; or owner trustee services (the“Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii)-1122(d)(2)(vii),1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performswith respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2015. With respect to the Platform, servicingcriterion 1122(d)(3)(ii) is applicable only as it relates to remittances. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliancewith the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’scompliance based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordancewith the attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)****and, accordingly, includedexamining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactionsand securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either priorto or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the periodcovered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonablebasis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicingcriteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertionthat the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended March 31, 2015is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

/s/KPMG LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

May 29, 2015
Exhibit
      32.1









CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002









I,
      Marinus Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
      of Pacific Software, Inc. (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of
      my
      knowledge:




(1)
            the
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal quarter
                ended
                March 31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                U.S.C.
                78m or 78 o(d)); and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











Date:  May
      13, 2008





/s/
      Marinus
      Jellema


Marinus
      Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer
      and


Chief
      Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act has been furnished to Pacific Software, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific
      Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Bureau of Labor Statistics

The Bureau of Labor Statistics Technical Advisory Committee will meet on Thursday, November 7, 2024. This meeting will be held virtually from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. EST.

The Committee presents advice and makes recommendations to the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on technical aspects of data collection and the formulation of economic measures and makes recommendations on areas of research. The BLS presents issues and then draws on the expertise of Committee members representing specialized fields within the academic disciplines of economics, statistics, data science, and survey design.

The schedule and agenda for the meeting are as follows:

10:00 a.m. Commissioner's Welcome and Review of Agency Developments

10:30 a.m. Updating the Contingent Worker Supplement to the Current Population Survey

1:00 p.m. Response Rates and Data Quality Measures with Integrated Data

2:00 p.m. Household Cost Indexes: Prototype Methods and Initial Results

3:00 p.m. Measuring Productivity of Metropolitan Statistical Areas

4:00 p.m. Approximate Conclusion

                    The meeting is open to the public. Any questions concerning the meeting should be directed to Sarah Dale, Bureau of Labor Statistics Technical Advisory Committee, at                     *BLSTAC@bls.gov.*                     Individuals planning to attend the meeting should register at                     *https://blstac.beventbrite.com.*                     Individuals who require special accommodations should contact Ms. Dale at least two days prior to the meeting date.                

Signed at Washington, DC, this 15th day of October 2024.

Leslie Bennett

Chief, Division of Management Systems.

[FR Doc. 2024-24138 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-24-P
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Woodgate Acquisition Corporation
 (the "Company"), hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2012 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ James Cassidy
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 11, 2013
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Essential Telecommunications, Inc.
(formerly Beachgate Acquisition Corporation)  (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2012 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects,
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ David F. Martin
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: April 15, 2013
#### Peterson, Appellant, vs. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin, Respondent.

*May 10*

June *15, 1951.*

*371
      *Frank L. Morrow*of Eau Claire, for the appellant.

The cause was submitted for the respondent on the brief of *Stafford & Stafford,*attorneys, and *Robert F Pfiffner*of counsel, all of Chippewa Falls.

Gehl, J.

We have recited only plaintiff’s testimony because we conclude that upon his own story the jury properly found that he was causally negligent at least with respect to speed and the manner in which he controlled his car. Plaintiff, when he.was still one hundred feet east of the intersection, observed that the Wiernasz truck was entering it. He did not turn his car to the right or left in an effort to avoid a collision; he applied his brakes but they did not offer *372enough resistance to the momentum of the car to enable him to stop. The latter fact was properly considered by the jury as evidence that, under the circumstances, he was driving at an excessive speed.

In view of the fact that there is ample testimony to support the jury’s finding that plaintiff was guilty of causal negligence with respect to the manner in which he controlled his car and the speed at which he was driving, and since Wier-nasz was exonerated in all respects, it is not necessary to review the finding that he was negligent with respect to lookout and yielding the right of way. Under those circumstances he is precluded from recovery.

Plaintiff complains that the court erred in its instructions with respect to the duty of drivers as to yielding the right of way. Since he was properly found guilty in other respects, and there was no occasion for comparison of negligence, if there was error in the charge he was not prejudiced thereby. He attacks the charge with the blanket statement that it “was error and grossly prejudicial to plaintiff” and was “misleading.” This is an insufficient presentation and does not require us to determine whether there was error in the instructions. *Sherwood v. Hulett,*134 Wis. 561, 114 N. W. 1111.

He contends that he was prejudiced by the court’s failure to deter defendant’s counsel in its effort to show, in the presence of the jury, the interest of plaintiff’s collision insurer in the result of the litigation.

Plaintiff’s counsel, instead of offering objection, participated in a discussion respecting the possible interest of plaintiff’s collision insurance carrier. He is in no position now to complain. In any event, in view of his own story as to the manner in which the collision occurred, w'e do not consider that he was prejudiced by the incident.

We are satisfied that the result reached was a proper one and results in no injustice to plaintiff.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83924]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24007]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 422 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-2, K2025-2.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24007 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 41594 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

MAURO BRITO

- RIVERA

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:15

- CR

- 846

- 1

Before JONES, CLEMENT, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Mauro Brito

- Rivera raises an
argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Rodriguez , 711 F.3d 541, 562
(5th Cir. 2013) (en banc)

, in which we held that the generic, contemporary

definition of sexual abuse of a minor does n ot require the age of consent to be
below 17 years old. Accordingly, the motion for summary disposition is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED
June 21 , 2016
Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-41594 Document: 00513557445 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/21/2016
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Simon  Westbrook,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
IN Media  Corporation's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  fiscal  quarter
ended March 31, 2010 fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material  respects the
financial condition and results of operations of IN Media Corporation.


Date: May 13, 2010                     By: /s/ Simon Westbrook
                                          ---------------------------------
                                       Name:  Simon Westbrook
                                       Title: Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 9, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 386 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-52, K2025-51.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-24042 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# L_2012264EN.01001201.xml

| 29.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 264/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 264/12

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 24 September 2012

appointing a German member and a German alternate member of the Committee of the Regions

(2012/529/EU)

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 305 thereof,

Having regard to the proposal of the German Government,

Whereas:

| (1) | On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

On 22 December 2009 and on 18 January 2010, the Council adopted Decisions 2009/1014/EU (1) and 2010/29/EU (2) appointing the members and alternate members of the Committee of the Regions for the period from 26 January 2010 to 25 January 2015.

| (2) | A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Werner JOSTMEIER. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member’s seat on the Committee of the Regions has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Werner JOSTMEIER.

| (3) | An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Dietmar BROCKES, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

An alternate member’s seat has become vacant following the end of the term of office of Mr Dietmar BROCKES,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The following are hereby appointed to the Committee of the Regions for the remainder of the current term of office, which runs until 25 January 2015:

| (a) | as member:






  — | Mr Markus TÖNS, Mitglied des Landtags des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(a)

as member:

—

Mr Markus TÖNS, Mitglied des Landtags des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen;

and

| (b) | as alternate member:






  — | Mr Stefan ENGSTFELD, Mitglied des Landtags des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

as alternate member:

—

Mr Stefan ENGSTFELD, Mitglied des Landtags des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 24 September 2012.

For the Council

The President

A. D. MAVROYIANNIS

---

(1)  
  OJ L 348, 29.12.2009, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 12, 19.1.2010, p. 11.

2

---