alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.7

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of Denison Mines Corp. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2011, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), each of the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, and SEC Rule 13a-14(b), that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: March 29, 2012



|       |  |                       |  |  |  |        |  |                     
|------ |  | --------------------- |  |  |  | ------ |  | --------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ James R. Anderson |  |  |  | By:    |  | /s/ Ron F. Hochstein
|Name:  |  | James R. Anderson     |  |  |  | Name:  |  | Ron F. Hochstein    
|Title: |  | Executive VP and CFO  |  |  |  | Title: |  | President and CEO
(logo) Prudential 

                                                                                                                                        Prudential Asset Resources

 

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel 214 777-4500

 

A business of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association

Attn: Commercial Mtg Servicing

MAC D1086-120

550 South Tryon Street,14th Floor

Charlotte, NC 28202

 

 

 

RE:        RBS Commercial Funding Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C9

Period:   **January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period")**

Annual Compliance Statement

I, Hal Collett, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the "Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement") dated as of October 1, 2012 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

 

(i)            a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the Reporting Period, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement has been made under my supervision, and

 

 

(ii)           to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled  all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout  the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

Effective as of March 19, 2015

 

 

 

/s/ Hal Collett

Hal Collett

President and Managing Director

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.
# L_2015010DE.01004502.xml

| 16.1.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 10/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 10/45

---

Berichtigung des Beschlusses 2012/93/Euratom des Rates vom 19. Dezember 2011 über das Rahmenprogramm der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft für Forschungs- und Ausbildungsmaßnahmen im Nuklearbereich (2012-2013)

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 47 vom 18. Februar 2012
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 47 vom 18. Februar 2012

Auf Seite 25, Erwägungsgrund 7:

anstatt:

| „(7) | Der Europäische Strategieplan für Energietechnologie (SET-Plan), der in den Schlussfolgerungen das Rates vom 28. Januar 2008 festgelegt wurde, ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(7)

Der Europäische Strategieplan für Energietechnologie (SET-Plan), der in den Schlussfolgerungen das Rates vom 28. Januar 2008 festgelegt wurde, ...“

muss es heißen:

| „(7) | Der Europäische Strategieplan für Energietechnologie (SET-Plan), der in den Schlussfolgerungen des Rates vom 28. Februar 2008 festgelegt wurde, ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„(7)

Der Europäische Strategieplan für Energietechnologie (SET-Plan), der in den Schlussfolgerungen des Rates vom 28. Februar 2008 festgelegt wurde, ...“

.

---
NASA thanks EPA for the opportunity to review and provide comment on the draft Dioxin Response to 

the NAS. Upon reading the document we understand that this draft Response to the NAS contains the 

IRIS draft risk assessment and our comments represent the interagency review step in the IRIS process.

Our comments target general issues with the draft, as written. 

• The draft is extremely long, complex, and very difficult to follow. This draft Dioxin risk 

assessment totals over 1900 pages (including over 1300 pages in Appendices) with significant 

discussion of assumptions and conclusions in the Appendices and not the main document. The 

length and organization of this draft undercut EPA’s stated goal of transparency and clarity. This 

issue has been noted in several recent draft EPA risk assessments that the voluminous, densely 

written discussion of scientific studies actually prevents the reader, including members of the 

general public, from readily understanding EPA’s choice and application of scientific 

information. 

• Review of this draft was hampered by the size and complexity of the draft risk assessment and the 

limited time for technical interagency review. A total of 5 weeks of review time, including a 

delayed receipt of the charge questions to only 2 weeks before the end of the comment period, 

was not adequate for sound, defensible review. This late receipt of the draft Change Questions is 

inconsistent with the established IRIS interagency process, by which Agencies receive both the 

draft risk assessment and the Charge Questions at the initiation of the review comment period. 

• The draft Charge Questions need to be expanded to answer several basic outstanding questions: 

o Did EPA address the NAS recommendations, not just the more limited set of questions 

targeted by EPA? What, if any, outstanding scientific issues remain? 

o Did EPA consistently apply its current policies and guidance in the cancer determination, 

Mode of Action, and linear response, and the choices of critical studies? 

o Did EPA err in the application of alternative approaches or new techniques to this 

controversial risk assessment? Was the justification of use of alternative approaches or 

new techniques consistent with current scientific thinking? 

NASA thanks EPA for this opportunity to participate in the IRIS interagency review process.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2864 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2864

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel R'ADVENTURE II.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2000

  Mr. Schumer introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
   referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to issue a certificate of 
   documentation with appropriate endorsement for employment in the 
             coastwise trade for the vessel R'ADVENTURE II.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENTATION.

    Notwithstanding section 27 of the Merchant Marine Act, 1920 (46 
App. U.S.C. 883), section 8 of the Act of June 19, 1886 (46 App. U.S.C. 
289), and section 12106 of title 46, United States Code, the Secretary 
of Transportation may issue a certificate of documentation with 
appropriate endorsement for employment in the coastwise trade for the 
vessel R'ADVENTURE II (United States official number 905373).
                                 <all>
```
mtvx_ex1072.htm


 


Exhibit 10.72


 







  





1











  






 


 







  





2











  






 







  





3











  






 







  





4











  






 







  





5











  






 







  





6











  






 







  





7
# L_2011296EN.01001601.xml

| 15.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 296/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 296/16

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1155/2011

of 10 November 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Šebreljski želodec (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Šebreljski želodec’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovenia’s application to register the name ‘Šebreljski želodec’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 November 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 45, 12.2.2011, p. 25.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

SLOVENIA

Šebreljski želodec (PGI)

---
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 43366

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

AARON FRANK THOMAS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2016 Unpublished Opinion No. 465

Filed: April 5, 2016

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Sixth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Bannock County. Hon. David C. Nye, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of ten years, with a minimum period 

of confinement of six years, for felony injury to children, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Ben P. McGreevy, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before MELANSON, Chief Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and GRATTON, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Aaron Frank Thomas pled guilty to felony injury to children. Idaho Code § 18-1501(1). 

The district court sentenced Thomas to a unified term of ten years with six years determinate to 

run consecutively to sentences in two unrelated cases. Thomas appeals asserting that the district 

court abused its discretion by imposing an excessive sentence.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 
2

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Thomas’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2
  CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Annual Report of Mega
Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K
for the period ending January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gennady
Pomeranets, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K for the period
ending January 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-K
for the period ending January 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group,
Inc.
  By:
                /s/Gennady
      PomeranetsGENNADY
      POMERANETSChief Financial
      Officer,Date:
                May
      21, 2009
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 3104 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 3104

  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the marking of door 
                                hinges.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

           September 25 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

  Mr. Shelby (for himself, Mr. Cochran, and Mr. Bond) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 with respect to the marking of door 
                                hinges.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MARKING OF DOOR HINGES.

    Section 304 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1304) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (l) as subsection (m); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (k) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(l) Marking of Certain Door Hinges.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), no 
        exception may be made under subsection (a)(3) with respect to 
        door hinges and parts thereof (except metal forgings and 
        castings imported for further processing into finished hinges 
        and door hinges designed for motor vehicles), each of which 
        shall be marked on the exposed surface of the hinge when viewed 
        after fixture with the English name of the country of origin by 
        means of die stamping, cast-in-mold lettering, etching, or 
        engraving.
            ``(2) Other means of marking.--If, because of the nature of 
        the article, it is not technically or commercially feasible to 
        mark it by 1 of the 4 methods specified in paragraph (1), the 
        article may be marked by an equally permanent method of marking 
        such as paint stenciling or, in the case of door hinges of less 
        than 3 inches in length, by marking on the smallest unit of 
        packaging utilized.''.

SEC. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by section 1 apply to goods entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on and after the date that is 
6 months after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of TXO Energy Partners, L.P. (the “ Partnership ”) hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





(i)    the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Partnership for the annual period ended December 31, 2022 (the “ Report ”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(ii)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.








Dated: March 31, 2023 s/  Brent W. Clum


Brent W. Clum


President of Business Operations and Chief Financial Officer


TXO Energy GP, LLC, its general partner





The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Partnership, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.


|US-DOCS\140173873.2||
Exhibit
99.7




















CONSENT OF
ENGINEER








Ladies and
Gentlemen:





The undersigned company
hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigned
company’s name included or incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection
with (a) the report entitled “Technical Report on the Denison
Mines Inc. Uranium Properties, Saskatchewan, Canada” dated
November 21, 2005, as revised on February 16, 2006, (b) the report
entitled “Technical Report on the Mineral Resource Estimate
for the McClean North Uranium Deposits, Saskatchewan” dated
January 31, 2007, and (c) the report entitled “Technical
Report on the Sue D Uranium Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate,
Saskatchewan, Canada” dated March 31, 2006, and (2) all other
references to the undersigned company included or incorporated by
reference in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines
Corp.





Dated: March 13,
2020








Per:





(Signed)
“Deborah A.
McCombe”


_____________________________________


Name: Deborah A. McCombe,
P.Geo.


Title: Technical Director -
Global Mining Advisory


Roscoe Postle Associates
Inc.














55
University Ave. Suite 501 | Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 |
T +1 (416) 947
0907            
           
www.rpacan.com
**EXHIBIT 32**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with this amended quarterly report of Amiworld, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A2 for the three month period ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

| Dated:  March 3, 2010 | s/Mamoru Saito_______________________

Mamoru Saito, Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                                                         |
| Dated:  March 3, 2010 | s/David Garin_________________________

David Garin, Chief Financial Officer |
EX-35.4
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of August 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Midland Loan
Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer,
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,
as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates Series 2012-CCRE2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein
not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from August 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period August 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far