alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2778

To amend the Sherman Act to make oil-producing and exporting cartels

illegal.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 2000

Mr. KOHL (for himself, Mr. DEWINE, Mr. SPECTER, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. GRASSLEY, and Mr. FEINGOLD) introduced the following bill; which was read

twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To amend the Sherman Act to make oil-producing and

exporting cartels illegal.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Oil Producing and

5 Exporting Cartels Act of 2000’’ or ‘‘NOPEC’’.

6 SEC. 2. SHERMAN ACT.

7 The Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. 1 et seq.) is amended

8 by adding after section 7 the following:
2

•S 2778 IS

1 ‘‘SEC. 7A. OIL PRODUCING CARTELS.

2 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—It shall be illegal and a violation

3 of this Act for any foreign state, or any instrumentality

4 or agent of any foreign state, to act collectively or in com5 bination with any other foreign state, any instrumentality

6 or agent of any other foreign state, or any other person,

7 whether by cartel or any other association or form of co8 operation or joint action—

9 ‘‘(1) to limit the production or distribution of

10 oil, natural gas, or any other petroleum product;

11 ‘‘(2) to set or maintain the price of oil, natural

12 gas, or any petroleum product; or

13 ‘‘(3) to otherwise take any action in restraint of

14 trade for oil, natural gas, or any petroleum product;

15 when such action, combination, or collective action has a

16 direct, substantial, and reasonably foreseeable effect on

17 the market, supply, price, or distribution of oil, natural

18 gas, or other petroleum product in the United States.

19 ‘‘(b) SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.—A foreign state en20 gaged in conduct in violation of subsection (a) shall not

21 be immune under the doctrine of sovereign immunity from

22 the jurisdiction or judgments of the courts of the United

23 States in any action brought to enforce this section.

24 ‘‘(c) INAPPLICABILITY OF ACT OF STATE DOC25 TRINE.—No court of the United States shall decline,
3

•S 2778 IS

1 based on the act of state doctrine, to make a determina2 tion on the merits in an action brought under this section.

3 ‘‘(d) ENFORCEMENT.—The Attorney General of the

4 United States and the Federal Trade Commission may

5 bring an action to enforce this section in any district court

6 of the United States as provided under the antitrust

7 laws.’’.

8 SEC. 3. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.

9 Section 1605(a) of title 28, United States Code, is

10 amended—

11 (1) in paragraph (6), by striking ‘‘or’’ after the

12 semicolon;

13 (2) in paragraph (7), by striking the period and

14 inserting ‘‘; or’’; and

15 (3) by adding at the end the following:

16 ‘‘(8) in an action brought under section 7A of

17 the Sherman Act.’’.

Æ
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                                   |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  |   | November                13, 2008                                                       |   | /s/                Glenn J. Clark |
|   |   | Glenn                J. Clark                                                          |
|   |   | Assistant                Vice President andPrincipal                Accounting Officer |
|   |

----
# Publications

## Filter Publications

### Publication Type

            - Book Chapter
            - Conference Paper
            - Journal
            - ORNL Report
            - Thesis / Dissertation

### Publication Date

            - 2024(6)
            - 2023(85)
            - 2022(90)
            - 2021(89)
            - 2020(111)
            - 2019(126)
            - 2018(116)
            - 2017(129)
            - 2016(112)
            - 2015(124)
            - 2014(110)
            - 2013(116)
            - 2012(119)
            - 2011(127)
            - 2010(132)
            - 2009(105)
            - 2008(122)
            - 2007(72)
            - 2006(40)
            - 2005(15)
            - 2004(6)
            - 2003(3)
            - 2002(4)
            - 2000(1)
            - 1998(1)
            - 1997(1)
            - 1992(1)

##   Efficient Synthesis and HPLC-Based Characterization for Developing Vanadium-48-Labeled Vanadyl Acetylacetonate as a Novel Cancer Radiotracer for PET Imaging

February, 2024

##   Design of Instrumentation for Noble Gas Transport in LSTL Needed for Model Development

February, 2024

##   Absolute Branching Ratios of Prominent γ Rays Following α Decay of 233U...

February, 2024

##   Microstructure and mechanical properties of friction stir weld performed on neutron-irradiated 304L steel with helium...

February, 2024

##   Comparing Sensor Fusion and Multimodal Chemometric Models for Monitoring U(VI) in Complex Environments Representative of Irradiated Nuclear Fuel

January, 2024

##   Advancing Elemental and Isotopic Analysis of Uranium Mineral Inclusions: Rapid Screening via Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and High-Resolution Laser Ablation-ICP-MS Mapping

January, 2024

##   β-delayed neutron emissions from N>50 gallium isotopes

December, 2023

##   Analysis of neptunium oxides produced through modified direct denitration

December, 2023

##   Preparation & shipping of ten neutron irradiated Eurofer97 steel variants to HFIR for SANS experiments

December, 2023

##   Novel Calibration Approach for Monitoring Aerosol Hydrogen Isotopes Using Laser-Induced Breakdown Spectroscopy for Molten Salt Reactor Off-Gas Streams

December, 2023

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
- …
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Nicholas Galeone, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reportson Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial MortgageTrust 2012-C4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicingand other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the ExchangeAct periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicershave fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any materialinstances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably reliedon information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, U.S. Bank National Association,as Certificate Administrator, U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor,CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the 1000 Harbor BoulevardMortgage Loan, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as Trustee for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as CertificateAdministrator for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian for the 1000 HarborBoulevard Mortgage Loan, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor for the 1000 Harbor Boulevard Mortgage Loan.

 

Dated: March 27, 2019

 

/s/ Nicholas Galeone

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitizationof the depositor)
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I,
Wayne A. Palladino, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:



Dated: August 13, 2008

/s/WAYNE A. PALLADINOName: Wayne A. Palladino
Title:Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
#### In the Matter of Dobson Factors, Inc., Petitioner, against Temporary State Housing Rent Administrator, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

November 12, 1957.

*Jay Emanuel*for petitioner.

*Nathan Heller*and *I. Walton Bader*for respondent.

Felix C. Benvenga, J.

This article 78 proceeding is brought by petitioner landlord to review a determination of the State Rent Administrator which granted the landlord an increase in rent in an amount less than requested.

In January, 1956, the landlord filed an application for an adjustment in rent from $55.20 to $90 a month, on the ground it had furnished an unfurnished apartment at a cost of $840. In August of that year, the local rent office granted an increase of $10 a month. Following the denial of its protest, the landlord instituted an article 78 proceeding, but before the proceeding came on to be heard, the administrator requested that the matter be remanded for further consideration. Upon the basis of a finding that the landlord had expended the sum of $824.95 for new furniture the rent was increased from $55.20 to $69 a month, effective August, 1956.

On the basis of this increase, the landlord will have amortized his capital investment and received a return of 6% thereon in approximately six years. Clearly, the adjustment over the period stated cannot be held to be unreasonable or arbitrary, especially in view of the two-year lease with the tenant. Since there is reasonable basis for the determination, *722this court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the administrator *(Matter of Park East Land Corp.*v. *Finkelstein,*299 N. Y. 70, 76; *Matter of First Terrace Gardens*v. *McGoldrick,*1 NY 2d 1, 4).

Apparently, the administrator has decided upon a policy of granting an increase in rent of 25% over the prior maximum rent, where an unfurnished apartment is converted into a furnished apartment with new furniture. While the policy is commendable, the formula should not be applied, except where, as in the instant case, it gives the landlord a fair return on his investment (see *Matter of Rubenstein,*N. Y. L. J., Oct. 15, 1957, p. 6, col. 1).

As for the effective date of the order, it is to be noted that it is the date of the granting of the original increase and that it becomes effective eight months after the filing of the original application. This date is in accordance with section 32 of the State Bent and Eviction Begulations.

The petition is dismissed.
# L_2015243EN.01001301.xml

| 18.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 243/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 243/13

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products and repealing Council Directive 73/44/EEC and Directives 96/73/EC and 2008/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 272 of 18 October 2011
  )

On page 7, Article 10(3):

for:

‘3.   In the case of the products referred to in Article 9(4), ...’,

read:

‘3.   In the case of the products referred to in Article 9(3), ...’.

---
# D ORIGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 19-0677

PUBLIC REPRIMAND AND SUSPENSION UNDER RULE 10(G) OF THE JUDICIAL STANDARDS PROCEDURAL RULES 

# FILED MAY 1 1 2023 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana PROCEEDING IN PUBLIC REPRIMAND

CHIEF JUSTICEMcGRATH: Thisisthetimeanddateset forthepublicreprimand ofDistrict Judge Raymond Dayton. Judge Dayton, ifyou will now come to thewell ofthe Court in front ofthe rostrum, we will proceed with your public reprimand. This proceeding is based on a formal disciplinary complaint filed against you with the Judicial Standards Commission in August 2022. The complaint is based on your actions and public comments made in a public hallway in the Anaconda-Deer Lodge County courthouse on August 11, 2022. Specifically you made highly inappropriate comments of a sexual nature about a witness in a matter pending in your court and in a related matter in the Justice Court. Your comments were made to the Justice ofthe Peace following a hearing in the Justice Court and overheard by court personnel. As recounted by thesewitnesses,your commentswere offensivetowomen andhighly derogatory toward a witness in both court proceedings. The comments indicate your lack ofrespect not only for the witness, but the ongoing legal process as well. Your conduct undermines the integrity ofthe office you hold. You have stipulated thatyour actions and comments in that rnatterviolated Rule 1.2 ofthe Code ofJudicial Conduct, which requires ajudge to act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the judiciary. This public reprimand is being delivered today in 05/11/2023

Case Number: PR 19-0677

### accordance with our Opinion and Order dated May 2, 2023, in which you were also

suspended from office for 30 days. Rule 1.2 of the Code of Judicial Conduct requiresjudges to act in a manner that promotes public confidence in the independence, integrity, and impartiality of the judiciary, and avoids the appearance of impropriety. We have determined that your conduct has eroded public confidence in the judiciary and created an appearance of impropriety in violation ofthe Montana Code ofJudicial Conduct. Judge Dayton, we hereby impose upon you the public reprimand ofthis Court. This Proceeding in Public Reprimand will be filed with the Clerk ofthe Supreme Court and copies shall be delivered to you, Judge Dayton, and to the members of the Judicial Standards Commission. DATED this 11th day ofMay, 2023.

ChiefJustice

Justices

2
#### Buetow, Respondent, vs. Hietpas and another, Appellants.

*May 25*

July *1, 1948.*

*65For the appellants there was a brief by *Benton, Bosser, Becker, Parnell & Fulton*of Appleton, and o'ral argument by *A. W. Parnell.*

The cause was submitted for the respondent oh the brief of *Allan C. Cain*of Kaukauna.

Fritz, J.

Appellants contend that the court’s order granting a new trial “in the interest of justice” is clearly invalid and ineffective because the court wholly failed to “set forth in detail therein” “the reasons that prompted the court to make such order.” In view of the court’s failure in that respect there are clearly applicable herein the provisions in sec. 270.49 (2), Stats., that,—

> “Every order granting a new trial shall specify the grounds therefor. ... No order granting a new trial in the interest of justice shall be valid or effective unless the reasons that *66prompted the court to make such order are set forth in detail therein.” ,

Thus by the provisions in the sentence last quoted the court is expressly required to specify in every order granting a new trial “in the interest of justice” “the reasons that prompted the court to make such order.” That provision is clearly mandatory, and unless the reasons thus required are set forth in detail in the order, there is applicable thereto the unambiguous provision that “no order granting a new trial in the interest of justice shall be valid or effective.” Consequently the order under review is not valid or effective and therefore it must be reversed and the cause remanded with directions to enter judgment upon the verdict-for plaintiff’s recovery from defendants of the damages assessed by the jury; and for contribution between Grissman and Hietpas and his insurer.

*By the Court,*— Order reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings as stated in the opinion.

Martin, J., took no part.
US
Bank(logo)



| | Global
    Corporate Trust          
| | ------------------------------------
| | 190
    S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor
| | MK-IL-SL7C                          
| | Chicago,
    IL 60603               
| |                                     
| | usbank.com                          



VIA:
EMAIL



UBS
Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.



1285
Avenue of the Americas



New
York, New York 10019



Attention:
Nicholas G. Galeone



Email:
nicholas.galeone@ubs.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com



Annual
Statement of Compliance



UBS-Barclays
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C4



| | Re: | The
                                         Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of December
                                         1, 2012 among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as depositor, Wells Fargo
                                         Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors LLC, as special
                                         servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as operating advisor, and U.S. Bank National
                                         Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,
Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:



(1)
A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)
and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement have been made under my supervision; and



(2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date:
February 28, 2022



| | U.S. Bank National Association,
    as Certificate Administrator
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                 
| | By:                                                             
| |                                                                 
| |
EXHIBIT 32 
Section 1350 Certifications STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned are the Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Certification accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. for the three months ended October  31, 2009. The undersigned certify that such 10-Q Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-Q Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. as of October 31, 2009. This Certification is executed as of  December 15, 2009. By:     /s/ Toni A. Eldred.                                              
----------------------------------------- 
Toni A. Eldred 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer) By:     /s/ Toni A. Eldred.                                              
----------------------------------------- 
Toni A. Eldred
Chief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Coastline Corporate Services, Inc. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.