alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.21

                              MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT



BETWEEN:       FINANCIAL INFORMATION CONSULTING SERVICES GROUP, a Belgian
               naamloze vennootschap with registered office at 87 Excelsiorlaan,
               1930 Zaventern, Belgium and registered with the Registry of
               Commerce of Brussels under number 515.450,

               hereafter, the "Company";

AND:           Michel Akkermans, residing at 3040 Huldenberg, Eygenstraat 33,
               and PAMICA NV with registered office at 3040 Huldenberg,
               Eygenstraat 33, Belgium and registered with the Registry of
               Commerce of Leuven under number 84.728,

               hereafter, the "Directors";



IT HAS BEEN AGREED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1.

The Company has entrusted daily management of the Company to the Directors.
The Company cannot entrust daily management to any other person during the Term
of this Agreement without the agreement of the Directors.

Article 2.

For the services mentioned above, the Company pays to the Directors an on target
remuneration of 15 Million BEF for 1999. This is split into a fixed part of 60%,
9 Million BEF and a variable part which amounts to 6 Million BEF on target. The
criteria for the exact determination of this variable part will be established
by the board of directors. The on target remuneration will be automatically
adjusted for inflation on an annual basis.

The total remuneration and other conditions of the management agreement can be
reviewed by the board of directors.

The split of the remuneration between the Directors, will be communicated to the
company by the Directors.

For 1998, a remuneration of 12 Million BEF is due.

The Directors will benefit from the normal fringe benefits (e.g. a company
car). All expenses which the Directors make on behalf of the company will be
re-imbursed.

Article 3.

3.1.   The Directors agree during the term of this Agreement, and for a period
       of two years after its termination:

       (i)    not be involved directly or indirectly in whatever capacity in any
              business which competes with the activities of the Company in the
              countries of the European Union and the United States of America;

       (ii)   not to solicit or try to solicit customers for goods or services
              of a similar nature as those of the Company from any person, firm
              or corporation which was a customer of the
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Lake Victoria Mining Company, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period end of December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the “report”), I, Roger A. Newell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 31st day of August, 2010.








ROGER A. NEWELLRoger A. NewellChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### United States African Development Foundation

# AGENCY:

United States African Development Foundation.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. African Development Foundation (USADF) will hold its quarterly meeting of the Board of Directors to discuss the agency's programs and administration. This meeting will occur at the USADF office.

# DATES:

The meeting date is Tuesday, October 29, 2024, 9 a.m. to 12:00 noon.

# ADDRESSES:

The meeting location is USADF, 1400 I St. NW, Suite 1000, Washington, DC 20005.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kerline Perry, (202) 233-8805.

(Authority: Pub. L. 96-533; 22 U.S.C. 290h)

Dated: October 10, 2024.

Wendy Carver,

Business Manager.

[FR Doc. 2024-24128 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6117-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 By:
    
    /s/ Sean P. McGrathName:
    
    Sean P. McGrathTitle:
    
    Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
    
    August 15, 2011
Exhibit 31.1

SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, Vladimir Vaskevich, certify that:

1. 	I have reviewed this Amended Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 of Riverdale Mining Inc.;

2. 	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. 	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a. 	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.  	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c. 	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. 	The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a. 	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b. 	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



|Date: November 26, 2007 | VLADIMIR VASKEVICH                                                              
|----------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Vladimir Vaskevich, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer





---
## In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth

___________________________ No. 02

- 18

- 00308

- CV

___________________________

On Appeal from the 96th District Court Tarrant County, T exas Trial Court No. 096

- 298864

- 18 Before Birdwell, Bassel, and Womack, JJ. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion



### R

AFAEL 

### M OLINA 

### , Appellant
V 

### . J ESSICA 

### B ATTES



### - G RABOWSKI 

### , J ESSICA 

### B ATTES 

### , Appellee2 MEMORANDUM OPINION Aft er R afael Molina appe aled from the trial court ’ s order dismissing his sui t against Jessica Battes

- Grabows ki in accordance with the T e xas Citiz ens Participation Act, Molina filed a petition for bankruptcy in federal court
. We therefore stayed th is appeal on January 29, 2019
. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. On Au gust 21, 2019, Battes

- Gr abowski filed a motion in this court seek ing to reins tate the appeal because the bankrup tcy court had rendered a discharge order and closed the case in May 2019
. See Tex. R. App. P. 8 .3(a). She also moved this court to dismiss the reinstated appeal for wan t of prosecution becaus e Molina ha d not sought
to rei nstate h is appeal i n the three months since the bankr uptcy court closed his case
. In her certificate of conference, B a ttes

- Grabows ki noted that Molina had not indicated whether he oppos e d th e m otion
. Mol in a ha s no t responded to Battes

- Grabowski ’ s moti on in th is court
. We therefore grant the motion, reinstate the appeal , and dismiss it for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 8.3( a), 42.3(b) ; Pa rker v. Parker , No. 01

- 13

- 00774

- CV , 2018 W L 285107, at *1 (Tex. App.

–– Houston [1 st Di st.] Jan. 4, 2018 , no pet.) (mem. op.) (per curiam )
. Per Curiam Delivered: Se ptember 26, 2019
PLEDGE AGREEMENT
 PLEDGE AGREEMENT Agreement sociedad
anónima de capital variable Pledgor Collateral Trustee FPCTA Indenture Trustee
  Indenture
  Subsidiary
 Pledged Stock




---



##### 



I.  DEFINITIONS AND RELATED MATTERS
 Section 1.01 Definitions
 Charges
 Excluded Property
 Security Interest
 Supplemental Documentation
 UCC
 Section 1.02 Terms Used in the UCC
 II.  THE SECURITY INTEREST
 Section 2.01 Security Interest Security
Interest Collateral Proceeds
  2




---



##### 



III.  WARRANTIES AND REPRESENTATIONS
  Section 3.01 Title to Collateral; Validity and Perfection of Security Interest; Absence of
Other Liens
 Section 3.02 Enforceability
 IV.  COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS
 Section 4.01 Delivery of Pledged Collateral, Etc. Pledged Collateral
 Section 4.02 Power of Attorney
  3




---



##### 



Section 4.03 Payment of Charges and Claims
 Section 4.04 Duty of Care provided
 Section 4.05 Sale of Collateral; Further Encumbrances
 Section 4.06 Voting Rights; Distributions
   4




---



##### 



V.  EVENTS OF DEFAULT; RIGHTS AND REMEDIES ON DEFAULT
 Section 5.01 Remedies
     5




---



##### 



Section 5.02 Application of Proceeds
   Section 5.03 Notice
  6




---



##### 



VI.  GENERAL
 Section 6.01 Collateral Trustees Expenses, Including Attorneys Fees
 Section 6.02 Successors and Assigns
 Section 6.03 Payments Set Aside
 Section 6.04 Continuing Security Interest; Termination; Release
   7




---



##### 



provided,
 Section 6.05 Governing Law
 Section 6.06 Notices
 Section 6.07 Counterparts
 Section 6.08 Complete Agreement
  8




---



##### 



Section 6.09 Submission to Jurisdiction; Waiver of Trial By Jury.
      The remainder of this page has been left blank intentionally
  9




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 Satélites Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V.:/s/ LUIS STEINName:
    Luis SteinTitle:
    CFO/s/ GUILLERMO REYESName:
    Guillermo ReyesTitle:
    Director of FinanceAddress and Telecopy No. for Notices:
Attention: Octavio Lecona Morales
Reforma 222
Piso 21
Col. Juarez, CP 06600
México DF
MÉXICO
+52 (55) 2629-5895HSBC BANK USA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,as Collateral Trustee:/s/ JOSEPH A. LLORETName:
    Joseph A. LloretTitle:
    Assistant Vice PresidentAddress and Telecopy No. for Notices:
Attention: Joseph Lloret
10 East 40th Street, 14th Floor
Corporate Trust and Loan Agency
New York, NY 10016
+1 (212) 525-1300




---



##### 



SCHEDULE A
 PLEDGED STOCK
   A-1
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida 

Opinion filed March 20, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D22-1798

Lower Tribunal No. 16-22203

________________

Sail America Commemorative, Incorporated,

Appellant,

vs.

Bank of America, N.A.,

Appellee.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Lourdes 

Simon, Judge.

Elliot L. Miller, for appellant.

Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo, and Tricia J. Duthiers, for appellee.

Before SCALES, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See Troncoso v. Larrain, 307 So. 3d 965, 967 (Fla. 3d DCA 

2020) (noting abuse of discretion standard and explaining that “[w]here ‘the 

party seeking to intervene has the same ultimate objective as a party to the 

suit, the existing party is presumed to adequately represent the party seeking 

to intervene unless that party demonstrates adversity of interest, collusion, 

or nonfeasance.’”) (quoting M2 Tech., Inc. v. M2 Software, Inc., 589 F. App’x. 

671, 675 (5th Cir. 2014)).
111298720 v1 June 16 th , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Exemption 11063 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA

Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Regulatory Docket

No. FAA

- 2014

- 0358

.

Dear Sir or Madam;

Snaproll Media was issued an E xemption numbered 11063 (hereinafter the Exemption)

for the purpose of conducting scripted, closed

- set filming for the motion picture and televis io n

industry. Snaproll Media herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow an addition al

type of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies with the conditions of the

Exemption.

Snaproll Media wishes to operate an Intuitive Aerial Aerigon IA3 under the same terms

and conditions contained in the Exemption. S ubmitted to the below CC as a confidential

document, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manual (FOPM) for the additional UAS. All

operations of the a dditional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of the Ex e mption.

As this is an amendment to an existing exemption asking for only the addition of another

type of unmanned aerial vehicle, Snaproll Media respectfully submits that good cause exists so

that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment.

Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request

for an amendment to the Exemption.

Sincerely yours, Spencer Valdez

cc:

Robert Pappas

Jake Troutman
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0416 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NE-13-AD-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Remove/replace 

prop for inspection 6.0 $ 510.00 $ 510.00 30 $15,300.00

Inspect shaft 1.0 $ 85.00 $ 85.00 30 $2,550.00

Engine removal 

and reinstall 65.0 $5,525.0

0

$5,525.00 30 $165,750.00

Replace prop shaft 35.0 $2,975.0

0

$2,975.00 30 $89,250.00

Consumable 

msterials $ 0.00 $2,200 $2,200.00 30 $66,000.00

Replacement shaft $ 0.00 $18,000 $18,000.00 30 $540,000.00

Engine test $ 0.00 $5,000 $5,000.00 30 $150,000.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $1,028,850

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00
Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs): ASE estimated 

cost based on pro-rata reduction on the life of the disk (9,700 cycles vs ALS 11,610 cycles), which 

applies to all 20 disks. Disk cost provided by RR plc ($443,000 for a new disk).

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24006]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 421 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-1, K2025-1.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24006 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
CERTIFICATION
OF
 CHIEF FINANCIAL
OFFICER
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with this Annual Report of Mega
Media Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB/A for the period
ending January 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gennady
Pomeranets, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certifies to the best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
  1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-KSB for the period ending January 31, 2008,
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
  2. The
information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the period
ending January 31, 2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Mega Media Group,
Inc.
  By:
                /s/Gennady
      PomeranetsGENNADY
      POMERANETSChief Financial
      Officer,Date:
                May
      19, 2008
Order entered September 16 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 13

- 00438

- CR

JAMES EMBRY MAY II, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Collin County, Texas Trial Cou rt Cause No. 005

- 84903

- 10



### O RDER

The Court REINSTATE S the appeal.
On August 27, 2013, we ordered the trial court to make findings regarding why appellant’s brief has not been filed. We ADOPT the findings that: (1) appellant desires to
pursue the appeal; (2) appellant is not indigent and is represented by retained counsel Melvyn Carson Bruder; and (3) Mr. Bruder requested until September 27, 2013 to file appellant’s brief.

We ORDER appellant to file his brief by FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 27, 2013 . No

further ext ensions will be granted. If appellant’s brief is not filed by the date specified, we will,
without further notice, submit the appeal without briefs. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(b)(4).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmiss ion, to Melvyn Carson Bruder and the Collin County District Attorney’s Office.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit
32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 
 
 In
connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of AFH Holding
II, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, I, Amir F.
Heshmatpour, President of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 1. Such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of  l934; and
 
 2. The
information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated:
      May 15, 2009
                      
                      /s/
      Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir
      F. HeshmatpourPresident
      (Principal Executive Officer)/s/
      Amir F. HeshmatpourAmir
      F. Heshmatpour(Principal
      Financial and Accounting Officer)