alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32





Certification of Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of First Financial Northwest,
Inc.


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002








Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), the
undersigned hereby certifies in his/her capacity as an officer of First
Financial Northwest, Inc. (the “Company”) and in connection with this Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q, that:





1.
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods presented in the financial statements
      included in the Report.














/s/Victor
Karpiak


Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)





Dated:
August 5, 2010











/s/Kari
Stenslie


Chief
Financial Officer


(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)





Dated:
August 5, 2010








55
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2942 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                S. 2942

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 6, 2000

                 Referred to the Committee on Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain 
         hydroelectric projects in the State of West Virginia.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 
              PROJECT.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission projects 
numbered 6901, 6902, and 7307, the Commission may, at the request of 
the licensee for each project, respectively, and after reasonable 
notice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and public 
interest requirements of that section and the Commission's procedures 
under that section, extend the time period during which the licensee is 
required to commence the construction of the project for 3 consecutive 
2-year periods.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (a) takes effect on the date of the 
expiration of the extension issued by the Commission before the date of 
the enactment of this Act under section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 
U.S.C. 806).
    (c) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of any of the projects described in 
subsection (a) expired before the date of the enactment of this Act--
            (1) the Commission shall reinstate the license effective as 
        of the date of its expiration; and
            (2) the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
        shall take effect on the expiration date.

            Passed the Senate October 5 (legislative day, September 
      22), 2000.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit 34.2 

**Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

The Board of Directors 

Citibank, N.A.: 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division ofCitibank, N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (*i.e.*, transaction-level reporting initiallyrequired under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately-issued (*i.e.*, for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipmentloan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January 1, 2006, as listed in Appendix A of the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agentservices (the “Platform”), except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are notapplicable to the activities it performs with respect to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is toexpress an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted inaccordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above andperforming such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to thePlatform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions andservicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does notprovide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Companycomplied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2013 is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ KPMG LLP 

Chicago,Illinois 

February 28, 2014
IB

Union Calendar No. 243

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 278

[Report No. 106–418]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

APRIL 12, 1999

Referred to the Committee on Resources

OCTOBER 27, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union

and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain

lands to the county of Rio Arriba, New Mexico.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. OLD COYOTE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.

4 (a) CONVEYANCE OF PROPERTY.—Not later than one

5 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary

6 of the Interior (herein ‘‘the Secretary’’) shall convey to

7 the County of Rio Arriba, New Mexico (herein ‘‘the Coun8 ty’’), subject to the terms and conditions stated in sub-
2

•S 278 RH

1 section (b), all right, title, and interest of the United

2 States in and to the land (including all improvements on

3 the land) known as the ‘‘Old Coyote Administrative Site’’

located approximately 1 4 ⁄2 mile east of the Village of Coy5 ote, New Mexico, on State Road 96, comprising one tract

6 of 130.27 acres (as described in Public Land Order 3730),

7 and one tract of 276.76 acres (as described in Executive

8 Order 4599).

9 (b) TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—

10 (1) Consideration for the conveyance described

11 in subsection (a) shall be—

12 (A) an amount that is consistent with the

13 special pricing program for Governmental enti14 ties under the Recreation and Public Purposes

15 Act; and

16 (B) an agreement between the Secretary

17 and the County indemnifying the Government

18 of the United States from all liability of the

19 Government that arises from the property.

20 (2) The lands conveyed by this Act shall be

21 used for public purposes. If such lands cease to be

22 used for public purposes, at the option of the United

23 States, such lands will revert to the United States.

24 (c) LAND WITHDRAWALS.—Land withdrawals under

25 Public Land Order 3730 and Executive Order 4599 as
3

•S 278 RH

1 extended in the Federal Register on May 25, 1989 (54

2 F.R. 22629) shall be revoked simultaneous with the con3 veyance of the property under subsection (a).

Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

Attest: GARY SISCO,

Secretary.
Union Calendar No. 243

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 278

[Report No. 106–418]

AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey

certain lands to the county of Rio Arriba, NewMexico.

OCTOBER 27, 1999

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the

State of the Union and ordered to be printed
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2892 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2892

 To designate the Federal building located at 158-15 Liberty Avenue in 
 Jamaica, Queens, New York, as the ``Floyd H. Flake Federal Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2000

  Mr. Schumer (for himself and Mr. Moynihan) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment 
                            and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the Federal building located at 158-15 Liberty Avenue in 
 Jamaica, Queens, New York, as the ``Floyd H. Flake Federal Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF FLOYD H. FLAKE FEDERAL BUILDING.

    The Federal building located at 158-15 Liberty Avenue in Jamaica, 
Queens, New York, shall be known and designated as the ``Floyd H. Flake 
Federal Building''.

SEC. 2. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the Federal building referred to in 
section 1 shall be deemed to be a reference to the Floyd H. Flake 
Federal Building.
                                 <all>
```
NUMBER 13-17-00229-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ADAMS GARDEN IRRIGATION 

DISTRICT #19, ET AL, Appellants,

v.

TEXAS COMMISSION ON 

ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, Appellee.

On appeal from the 201st District Court

of Travis County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to abate the appeal to 

allow the parties the opportunity to engage in settlement negotiations. 

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the 
2

joint motion to abate, is of the opinion that the joint motion to abate the appeal pending 

settlement should be granted. The joint motion to abate the appeal pending settlement 

is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED until July 16, 2018. 

The Court directs appellants to file, on or before July 16, 2018, either (1) a motion 

to reinstate the appeal, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

17th day of April, 2018.
Last updated on 9/18/2015 http://www3.epa.gov/airtrends/values.html



## Air Trends 

# Design Values A design value is a statistic that describes the ai r quality status of a given location relative to th e level of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). Design values are defined to be consistent with theindividual NAAQS as described in CFR Part 50. Design values are typically used to designate and c lassify nonattainment areas, as well as to assess p rogress towards meeting the NAAQS. To view a list o f areas designated nonattainment, see EPA's Green Book site. Design values are computed and published annually b y EPA's Office of Air Quality Planning and Standard s and reviewed in conjunction with the EPA Regional Offices. Some of these design values can change after the date of pu blication for a variety of reasons, including but n ot limited to: 1) EPA agreement that certain data w ere influenced by exceptional events and therefore not subject for comparison wit h the NAAQS, 2) States retroactively entering or ch anging erroneous data based on later findings, and/or 3) notification of a monitoring issue (e.g. network design, site combina tion, change in the regulatory status of a monitor) that would prompt a revision. The information listed in these reports and in thes e tables is intended for informational use only and does not constitute a regulatory determination by EPA as whether an area has attained a NAAQS. The information set forth in this report has no regulatory effect. To have regulator y effect, a final EPA determination as to whether a n area has attained a NAAQS or attained a NAAQS as of its applicable attainmentdate can be accomplished only after rulemaking that provides an opportunity for notice and comment. N o such determination for regulatory purposes exists in the absence of such r ulemaking. This report does not constitute a propos ed or final rulemaking.

2014 Design Value Reports Contacts PM2.5 Detailed Information (XLSX, 1.5MB) - Updated 8/19/2015 Brett Gantt Gantt.Brett@epa.gov (919) 541-5274 PM10 Detailed Information (XLSX, 505k) David Mintz Mintz.David@epa.gov (919) 541-5224 Ozone Detailed Information (XLSX, 530k) Ben Wells Wells.Benjamin@epa.gov (919) 541-7507 Carbon Monoxide Detailed Information (XLSX, 202k) David Mintz Mintz.David@epa.gov (919) 541-5224 Sulfur Dioxide Detailed Information (XLSX, 448k) Doug Solomon Solomon.Douglas@epa.gov (919) 541-4132 Nitrogen Dioxide Detailed Information (XLSX, 301k) Ben Wells Wells.Benjamin@epa.gov 919) 541-7507 Lead Detailed Information (XLSX, 94k) Halil Cakir Cakir.Halil@epa.gov (919) 541-2416 Previous Design Value Reports 

# Design Values | AirTrends | Air & Radiation | EPA http://www3.epa.gov/airtrends/values.html

1 of 1 9/30/2015 5:14 PM
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3590 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3590

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 
  the income threshold used in determining the deduction for medical 
                                 care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Halt Tax Increases on the Middle 
Class and Seniors Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN INCOME THRESHOLD FOR DETERMINING MEDICAL 
              CARE DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``10 percent'' and inserting ``7.5 
percent''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 213 of such Code is amended by striking 
        subsection (f).
            (2) Section 56(b)(1)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``without regard to subsection (f) of such section'' and 
        inserting ``by substituting `10 percent' for `7.5 percent'''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.

            Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3590

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 
  the income threshold used in determining the deduction for medical 
                                 care.
```
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
 February 7, 2008 (February 7, 2008)
 T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    000-19580
    
    76-0697390(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 7135 Ardmore
Houston, Texas 77054
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
 (713) 996-4110
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
   2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.Date: February 7, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Michael T. MinoMichael T. MinoChief Financial Officer and
Vice President 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release dated February 7, 2008
 4
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. §1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  **DATE:                August 13, 2008** |  **/s/                Donald W. Hughes** |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                           | **Donald                W. Hughes**           |
|                                           | **Chief                Financial Officer**    |

*A      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been      provided to Camden Learning Corporation and will be retained by Camden Learning      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its      staff      upon request.*

----
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.
1585 Broadway
Attn: Mortgage Backed Securities
New York, New York 10036


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill
Lynch Trust 2012-C6,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series
2012-C6

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision;
and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period.


March 7, 2014


/s/Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
* Pursuant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-20652

DAVID A. MARTIN,

Plaintiff-Appellant/

Cross-Appellee,

versus

LEE COLLEGE; TOM SANDERS;

PAMELA PAYNE; JACKSON SASSER;

and DENNIS R. TOPPER,

Defendants-Appellees/

Cross-Appellants

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

(H-96-3986 )

June 9, 1998

Before GARWOOD, JONES and WIENER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff-Appellant David A. Martin appeals from the district

court’s summa ry judgment dismissing his claims and from that

court’s denial of his motion to remand the case to the state court2

from which it had been removed. Defendants-Appellees cross appeal

the district court’s dismissal of their counter claim for

attorneys’ fees and costs.

We have revie wed the summary judgment record and considered

the facts and the arguments of counsel as s et forth in their

respective briefs, and conclude not only that summary judgment was

providently granted but that Martin’s appeal is so lacking in merit

as to approach frivolousness. We therefore affirm the district

court’s dismissal of Ma rtin’s claims and assess costs of this

appeal to him. Regarding the district court’s refusal to grant

attorneys’ fees and costs to the Defendants, our standard of review

is abuse of discretion and is thus so deferential as to mandate our

affirmance of the district court’s ruling on this issue.

AFFIRMED at Appellant’s cost.