alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the month of November 2007
 Commission File Number: 001-32179
 INTEROIL CORPORATION
  THE YUKON TERRITORY, CANADA
  60-92 COOK STREET
PORTSMITH, QLD 4870, AUSTRALIA
 (61) 7 4046 4600
  ü
 
 
  ü




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  INTEROIL CORPORATIONBy:
    
    /s/ Phil MulacekPhil Mulacek
Chief Executive OfficerDate: 5 November 2007




---



##### 



INTEROIL CORPORATION
FORM 6-K FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2007
 Exhibit Index
 1.
    
    Amendment 1 to Amended and Restated Indirect Participation Interest Agreement by and
among InterOil Corporation and the Investors
# L_2011066EN.01001501.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/15

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 241/2011

of 11 March 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Miele delle Dolomiti Bellunesi (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Miele delle Dolomiti Bellunesi’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Miele delle Dolomiti Bellunesi’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 184, 8.7.2010, p. 32.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.4.   Other products of animal origin (eggs, honey, various dairy products except butter, etc.)

ITALY

Miele delle Dolomiti Bellunesi (PDO)

---
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-203 Date: April 3, 2002 

Subject: Children’s Equity Update

The purpose of this letter is to inform you how the change in Blue Cross and Blue Shield options has affected the 

Children’s Equity procedures and of a correction to BAL 00-224, Federal Employees Health Benefits: Children’s Equity. 

Change to BAL 00-224, Federal Employees Health Benefits: Children’s Equity 

Public Law 106-394, the “Federal Employees Health Benefits Children’s Equity Act of 2000,” requires agencies to enroll 

employees in the lowest option of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan if the employee is not enrolled or 

if he/she is enrolled in an HMO that doesn’t serve the area in which the children live. The Basic Option is now the 

lowest option of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan. We have revised BAL 00-224, Federal 

Employees Health Benefits: Children’s Equity to read as follows: 

 If the Employee Is Not Enrolled at All 

If the employee is not enrolled for any FEHB coverage, enroll him/her for self and family coverage in the Basic 

Option of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan (enrollment code 112). 

If the Employee Has Self and Family Coverage in an HMO That Doesn't Serve the Area Where the 

Children Live 

 

If the employee already has a self and family enrollment, but it's in an HMO that doesn't serve the area where 

the children live, change the enrollment to self and family in the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Basic Option. 

Correction to BAL 00-224 

In BAL 00-224, we stated that if an employee participates in premium conversion, he must wait until the open season 

after the last child reaches age 22 to cancel or change to self only. We have since determined that loss of a dependent 

is a qualifying life event. An employee can elect to cancel or change to self only if he/she makes this request within 60 

days after the date the last child turned age 22. Please correct BAL 00-224 to reflect this new information. 

 

 Abby L. Block 

 Associate Director 

 For Insurance Programs
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6712
JESSE JAMES PRITCHARD, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GEORGE ALLEN; ED MURRAY; E. C. MORRIS; L. M. SAUNDERS; STU TAYLOR; MAJOR DAY; D. BOYERS, Captain; LIEUTENANT BOYERS; CAPTAIN HALLOWAY; LIEUTENANT LYLES; SERGEANT SPROUSE; GUARD PERRY; GUARD SILVEA; INVESTIGATOR DURY; RONALD ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of V irginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-95-319-R) Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., App ellant Pro Se. Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).23 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pritchard v. Allen , No. CA-95-319-R (W.D. Va. Apr. 1, 1996).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 18-203 Date: September 20, 2018

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and Federal Employees Dental and 

Vision Insurance Program: Expiration of Coverage of Children of Same-Sex Domestic 

Partners 

Background 

Effective January 1, 2014, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) published a final rule 

that allowed children of same-sex domestic partners living in states that did not allow same-sex 

couples to marry to be covered family members under the FEHB and the FEDVIP. 

Subsequently, as the result of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. Hodges legalizing 

same sex marriage in all states, OPM published an interim final regulation on December 2, 2016 

that created a regulatory exception that allowed only children of same-sex domestic partners 

living overseas to maintain their FEHB and FEDVIP coverage. However, as the regulation 

provides, this exception is only available until September 30, 2018. 

Required Action 

If an exception has been granted for your agency, please ensure that notice is provided to the 

parents of minor children and the adult children of domestic partners living overseas that will 

become ineligible for FEHB coverage on September 30, 2018. The notice should include that 

the child’s coverage is ending and the child is eligible for a 31-day extension of coverage, the 

right to convert to an individual contract offered by the carrier or Temporary Continuation of 

Coverage (TCC) with the child’s carrier for up to 36 months from the date the child loses 

eligibility under the FEHB Program. 

There is no extension of coverage or right to convert to an individual policy or TCC when 

FEDVIP coverage stops or when a family member loses eligibility under the FEDVIP Program. 

Please have FEDVIP enrollees contact BENEFEDS to make any required enrollment 

adjustments. 
After September 30, 2018, agencies must ensure that no children of same-sex domestic partners 

are covered under the FEHB Program. 

Please contact Michael W. Kaszynski, Senior Policy Analyst, at Michael.Kaszynski@OPM.gov 

with any questions. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. 

Sincerely, 

Alan P. Spielman 

Director 

Healthcare and Insurance
Featured           Riding through: Researchers enhance reliability of electric vehicle charging          

Featured           Steven Campbell: Building technical expertise in the electric grid from the ground up         

Featured           SUPER technology manages intelligent building blocks for a more reliable electric grid         

# Grid Systems Architecture

## Grid Systems Architecture

The Grid Systems Architecture Group focuses on overall system architectures for distribution system networks — microgrids, hubs and nodes – with integration of supporting equipment, such as distributed energy resources and power electronics. System architectures incorporate communication, control, optimization and algorithms. The group develops solutions in simulation and real-time platforms, including controller hardware-in-the-loop and full hardware systems.

### Contact

MichaelR Starke

starkemr@ornl.gov

## Current Research

## News

Riding through: Researchers enhance reliability of electric vehicle charging 

## News

Steven Campbell: Building technical expertise in the electric grid from the ground up

## News

SUPER technology manages intelligent building blocks for a more reliable electric grid

## News

Solar celebration energizes microgrid research
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We  hereby  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-72250),  Form S-8 (No. 333-37062), Form S-8 (No.
333-43370),  Form S-8 (No. 333-43372),  Form S-8 (No. 333-43376),  Form S-8 (No.
333-45766),  Form S-8 (No. 333-82369),  Form S-8 (No. 333-82383),  Form S-8 (No.
333-82381), Form S-8 (No. 333-82711), Form S-3, as amended (No. 333-75178), Form
S-3 (No.  333-36470) and Form S-3, as amended (No.  333-85688) of S1 Corporation
of our report dated March 14, 2003,  relating to the  financial  statements  and
financial  statement schedule of S1 Corporation as of December 31, 2001 and 2002
and for each of the three years in the period ended  December  31,  2002,  which
appears in this Form 10-K.



PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Atlanta, Georgia
March 31, 2003
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

MINDYN LYNN MARMILLION,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 19 MM 2024

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4

th day of June, 2024, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for 

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to 

process the previously submitted Petition for Allowance of Appeal, including issuing any 

defect-correction notice upon counsel, if warranted.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)




(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      November 13, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Zishen WuZishen
      WuPresident
      and CEODated:
      November 13, 2009
                    By:
                    /s/
      Sam YuSam
      YuChief
      Financial
Officer
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 FEBRUARY 23, 2011

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 10-13984

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 8:09-cr-00185-JSM-TBM-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MANUEL CAMACHO BARCENAS,

 Defendant-Appellant.

__________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Middle District of Florida

_________________________

(February 23, 2011)

Before HULL, MARTIN and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

Richard Rosenbaum, appointed counsel for Manuel Camacho Barcenas, in

this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of
the appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record

reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. 

Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues

of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Barcenas’s conviction

and sentence are AFFIRMED.

2
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of SupportSave Solutions, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Marie Saycon Tagoc, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|   
|    | Dated this 12th day of October, 2007.                                                                                                                
|   

MARIE TAGOC
Marie Saycon Tagoc, Chief Financial Officer





















---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 278 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 278

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain lands to the 
                   county of Rio Arriba, New Mexico.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OLD COYOTE ADMINISTRATIVE SITE.

    (a) Conveyance of Property.--Not later than one year after the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior (herein ``the 
Secretary'') shall convey to the County of Rio Arriba, New Mexico 
(herein ``the County''), subject to the terms and conditions stated in 
subsection (b), all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
and to the land (including all improvements on the land) known as the 
``Old Coyote Administrative Site'' located approximately \1/2\ mile 
east of the Village of Coyote, New Mexico, on State Road 96, comprising 
one tract of 130.27 acres (as described in Public Land Order 3730), and 
one tract of 276.76 acres (as described in Executive Order 4599).
    (b) Terms and Conditions.--
            (1) Consideration for the conveyance described in 
        subsection (a) shall be--
                    (A) an amount that is consistent with the special 
                pricing program for Governmental entities under the 
                Recreation and Public Purposes Act; and
                    (B) an agreement between the Secretary and the 
                County indemnifying the Government of the United States 
                from all liability of the Government that arises from 
                the property.
            (2) The lands conveyed by this Act shall be used for public 
        purposes. If such lands cease to be used for public purposes, 
        at the option of the United States, such lands will revert to 
        the United States.
    (c) Land Withdrawals.--Land withdrawals under Public Land Order 
3730 and Executive Order 4599 as extended in the Federal Register on 
May 25, 1989 (54 F.R. 22629) shall be revoked simultaneous with the 
conveyance of the property under subsection (a).

            Passed the Senate March 25, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 278

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To direct the Secretary of the Interior to convey certain lands to the 
                   county of Rio Arriba, New Mexico.
```
ACTIO N 

SI 0-100304-054 

GUAM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 

PARTNERS IN PROGRESS 

CONTROL NO. 

February 18, 2010 

o 

THE HONORABLE RAY LAHOOD 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood; 

On behalf of the Board of Directors and Membership of the Guam Chamber of Commerce, 1 write to 

support the application of U.S. carriers to provide daily nonstop service between Guam and Tokyo 

Haneda airport. The Chamber applauds the efforts of your office in securing the open skies agreement 

with Japan. 

Guam's economy depends heavily upon tourist traffic from points across the Asian region, with Japan 

being a critical tourist market for our island. Tourism represents 35% of Guam's Gross Island Product and 

the addition of the Tokyo Haneda route would be instrumental in stimulating more jobs for our island. 

Haneda airport is ideally situated for the Japanese tourist and businessman who live in central, southern 

and western Tokyo, and obtaining U.S. carrier scheduled service to and from Haneda will be a positive 

impact on Guam's economy. 

We understand that five U.S. carriers are interested in the opportunity to service Haneda. We urge you to 

consider the carrier who will provide air service connecting Guam with Tokyo's downtown Haneda 

airport Continental Airiines and its subsidiary. Continental Micronesia, is seeking approval to gam access 

for this service. Continental is the only carrier operating a hub on Guam. Commumties in Micronesia, 

including the CNMI, Palau and the FSM will also benefit from the one-stop connection at Guam s 

international airport to Haneda. 

We believe that this new service is critical to the future growth of our island and the region. Thank you 

for your consideration of our comments. 

Sincfitelyr- sincfi 

DAVID J. JO 

Chairman of 

17<l A^ninall Avenue • Suite 101, Ada Plaza Center, Hagitna • P.O. Box 283, HagJtna, GU 96932 

Tel. (671) 472-63U/8 X FtT(671) 472"1o2 •' http://www.guamchlber.com.gu • tmail: gchamber@guamchamber.com.gu
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

November 29, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134484 & (25)(26) Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134484 

 COA: 276403 
 Baraga CC: 03-000821-FH 

ERIC J. MARTIN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the motions for immediate consideration and release on 

bond are DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the June 15, 2007 order of the 

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D). 

d1119 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

November 29, 2007 

 Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6940

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

KENNETH RICHARD SANTIAGO, a/k/a Kenneth

Santiago-Gonzalez, a/k/a David, a/k/a Coca,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, District Judge.

(CR-95-318, CA-96-364-AM)

Submitted: February 12, 1998 Decided: February 26, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Richard Santiago, Appellant Pro Se. James L. Trump, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).

We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. United States v. Santiago, Nos. CR-95-318, CA-96-364-AM

(E.D. Va. May 20, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 23.5**CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS