alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012019EN.01002101.xml

| 24.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 19/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 19/21

---

COUNCIL DECISION 2012/34/CFSP

of 23 January 2012

appointing the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240 thereof,

Having regard to Council Decision 2001/79/CFSP setting up the Military Committee of the European Union (1),

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union ("the Military Committee") shall be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. According to Article 3(2) of the said Decision, the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee is three years, unless the Council decides otherwise. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 3(1) of Decision 2001/79/CFSP, the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union ("the Military Committee") shall be appointed by the Council on the recommendation of the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence. According to Article 3(2) of the said Decision, the term of office of the Chairman of the Military Committee is three years, unless the Council decides otherwise.

| (2) | On 8 December 2008, the Council appointed General Håkan SYRÉN as Chairman of the Military Committee for a period of three years as from 6 November 2009 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

On 8 December 2008, the Council appointed General Håkan SYRÉN as Chairman of the Military Committee for a period of three years as from 6 November 2009 (2).

| (3) | At its meeting on 22 November 2011, the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Patrick de ROUSIERS be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

At its meeting on 22 November 2011, the Military Committee meeting at the level of the Chiefs of Defence recommended that General Patrick de ROUSIERS be appointed Chairman of the Military Committee,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

General Patrick de ROUSIERS is hereby appointed Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union for a period of three years as from 6 November 2012.

Article 2

This Decision shall enter into force on the day of its adoption.

Done at Brussels, 23 January 2012.

For the Council

The President

C. ASHTON

---

(1)  
  OJ L 27, 30.1.2001, p. 4.

1

(2)  Council Decision 2009/22/EC of 8 December 2008 appointing the Chairman of the Military Committee of the European Union (OJ L 9, 14.1.2009, p. 51).

2

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 1, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 371 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2025-6, K2025-6.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-23996 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 REQUIRED BY RULE 13A-14(1) OR RULE 15D-14(A) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Kevin Jasper, certify that:
 
 1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Insight Management Corporation.
 
 2.           Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
 3.           Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.           The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
 
 a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 c)
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
 
 5.           The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
 
 a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b)
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
 
 6.           The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
 
 Dated: November 22, 2010
 
 By:
/s/ Kevin JasperKevin JasperChief Executive Officer and
 Principal Financial Officer
# C_2012019EN.01000601.xml

| 24.1.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.1.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/6

---

Council and Commission Declaration

2012/C 19/03

With reference to the review of the prohibition on import, purchase or transport of Iranian oil provided for in Article 26(2) of Council Decision 2010/413/CFSP, the Council and the Commission agreed to revert to the issue of Member States currently importing a large quota of Iranian oil without delay and no later than at its meeting in April 2012 with a view to ensuring through all necessary actions the continuity of energy supply, taking into account their national economic situation.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-K Report of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2010 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 /s/ PAUL M. PARRISHPaul  M. ParrishChief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)
---

Exhibit 99.20

CONSENT OF GEOLOGIST

Ladies and Gentlemen:

The undersigned company hereby consents to (1) the references
to the undersigned companys name included or incorporated by reference in the
Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the report
entitled NI 43-101 Technical Report Mineral Resource Estimate for the Mutanga
Uranium Project, Zambia, Africa dated September 12, 2013 and (2) all other
references to the undersigned company included or incorporated by reference in
the registration statement in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines
Corp.



Dated: March 12, 2015



CSA GLOBAL (UK) LTD.



By: /s/ Galen
WhiteName: Galen White BSc(Hons), FAusIMM, FGS Title: Managing
Director/Principal Consultant

---
Exhibit 99.12

SRK
Consulting (Canada)
Inc.
1500, 155 University
Avenue
Toronto, Ontario,
Canada
M5H
3B7

T:
+1.416.601.1445
F:
+1.416.601.9046

toronto@srk.com
www.srk.com








CONSENT OF ENGINEER


Ladies and
Gentlemen:





The undersigned
hereby consents to (1) the references to the undersigned’s
name included or incorporated by reference in the Annual Report on
Form 40-F of Denison Mines Corp. in connection with the reports
entitled “Technical Report with an Updated Mineral Resource
Estimate for the Waterbury Lake Property, Northern
Saskatchewan” dated December 21, 2018, and (2) all other
references to the undersigned included or incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 40-F of Denison Mines
Corp.





Dated: 
March 13, 2020





(signed) "Cliff
Revering"


__________________________


Cliff Revering,
P.Eng.


SRK Consulting
(Canada) Inc.





Local
Offices:
Saskatoon
Sudbury
Toronto
Vancouver
Yellowknife
Group
Offices:
Africa
Asia
Australia
Europe
North
America
South
America
EXHIBIT 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Timothy C. Oliver, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Metavante Technologies, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this
report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.
The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any
change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Timothy C. Oliver  
|Timothy C. Oliver      
|Chief Financial Officer
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2811

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development Act to make

communities with high levels of out-migration or population loss eligible

for community facilities grants.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 28, 2000

Mr. DASCHLE (for himself and Mr. CONRAD) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry

A BILL

To amend the Consolidated Farm and Rural Development

Act to make communities with high levels of out-migration or population loss eligible for community facilities

grants.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. COMMUNITY FACILITIES GRANT PROGRAM FOR

4 RURAL COMMUNITIES WITH HIGH LEVELS OF

5 OUT-MIGRATION OR LOSS OF POPULATION.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 306(a) of the Consoli7 dated Farm and Rural Development Act (7 U.S.C.

8 1926(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
2

•S 2811 IS

1 ‘‘(20) COMMUNITY FACILITIES GRANT PROGRAM

2 FOR RURAL COMMUNITIES WITH HIGH LEVELS OF

3 OUT-MIGRATION OR LOSS OF POPULATION.—

4 ‘‘(A) GRANT AUTHORITY.—The Secretary

5 may make grants to associations, units of gen6 eral local government, nonprofit corporations,

7 and Indian tribes (as defined in section 4 of the

8 Indian Self-Determination and Education As9 sistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450b)) in a State to

10 provide the Federal share of the cost of devel11 oping specific essential community facilities in

12 any geographic area—

13 ‘‘(i) that is represented by—

14 ‘‘(I) any political subdivision of a

15 State;

16 ‘‘(II) an Indian tribe on a Fed17 eral or State reservation; or

18 ‘‘(III) other federally recognized

19 Indian tribal group;

20 ‘‘(ii) that is located in a rural area (as

21 defined in section 381A);

22 ‘‘(iii) with respect to which, during

23 the most recent 5-year period, the net out24 migration of inhabitants, or other popu25 lation loss, from the area equals or exceeds
3

•S 2811 IS

1 5 percent of the population of the area;

2 and

3 ‘‘(iv) that has a median household in4 come that is less than the nonmetropolitan

5 median household income of the United

6 States.

7 ‘‘(B) FEDERAL SHARE.—Paragraph

8 (19)(B) shall apply to a grant made under this

9 paragraph.

10 ‘‘(C) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIA11 TIONS.—There are authorized to be appro12 priated to carry out this paragraph

13 $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2001 and such

14 sums as are necessary for each subsequent fis15 cal year, of which not more than 5 percent of

16 the amount made available for a fiscal year

17 shall be available for community planning and

18 implementation.’’.

19 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section

20 381E(d)(1)(B) of the Consolidated Farm and Rural De21 velopment Act (7 U.S.C. 2009d(d)(1)(B)) is amended by

22 striking ‘‘section 306(a)(19)’’ and inserting ‘‘paragraph

23 (19) or (20) of section 306(a)’’.

Æ
EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and
Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012 (the Sale and Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2012-3, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as
Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on March 1, 2013 and ending on February 28, 2014 and of the Servicers performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made
under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Capitalized terms used in this certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing
Agreement.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers
Certificate this 23rd day of May, 2014.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. ReedyExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Karen
Hawkins, principal financial officer of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/  Karen Hawkins.Karen
      Hawkins, Principal Financial
                OfficerDated:
      January 12, 2011
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________ No. SC17

- 1324

____________ MARBEL MENDOZA, Appellant,

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [January 30, 2018]

PER CURIAM.
We have for review Marbel Mendoza’s appeal of the circuit court’s order denying Mendoza’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. Mendoza’s motion sought relief pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Hurst v. Florida , 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on
remand in Hurst v. State ( Hurst ), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017). This Court stayed Mendoza’s appeal pending the di sposition of
Hitchcock v. State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017)

.- 2

-

After this Court decided Hitchcock , Mendoza responded to this Court’s order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case.
After reviewing Mendoza’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Mendoza is not entitled to relief. Mendoza was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a
vote of seven to five. Mendoza v. State , 700 So. 2d 670, 673 (Fla. 1997). Mendoza’s sentence of death became final in 1998. Mendoza v. Florida , 525 U.S. 839 (1998). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Mendoza’s sentence of
death. See Hitchcock , 226 So. 3d at 217. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of Mendoza’s motion. The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Mendoza , we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
ordered. LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, and LAWSON, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion. LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result. PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
v. State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock

.- 3

-

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Dade County, Dava J. Tunis , Judge

- Case No. 13 1992CF009940C000XX Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Bryan E. Martinez, Staff Attorney, and Rachel L. Day, Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, Florida, and Melissa J. Roca , Assistant Attorney General, Miami , Florida, for Appellee