### NorthDakota 4/6/09 Submittal Completeness Checklist-CompletedbyAmy Platt



### 40 CFR 51APPENDIXVCRITERIA SUBMITTAL ITEM

2.1 Administrative Materials

(a) A formal letterof submittal from the Governor orhis designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof (hereafter litheplanll ) • 4/6/09 Governor's letter 4/9/09 SAD letter

(b) Evidence that the Statehas adopted the plan in the State code orbody of regulations; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement (hereafter IIdocumentll ) in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of theplan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. (c) Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authorityunder State law to adopt and implement the plan. 2/2/09 A.G.'s Opinion

(d) A copy of the actual regulation, or Yes

- SIP chapters and rule revisions document submitted for approval and effective 4/1/09. incorporationby reference into theplan, including indication of the changesmade to the existing approvedplan, where applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, datedby the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, whenever possible, be indicated in the document itself. (e) Evidence that the State followed all of theprocedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting and completing the adoption/issuance of theplan. 2/2/09 A.G.'s Opinion Summary of Proceedings Hearing Record

(f) Evidence that publicnotice was given of theproposed change consistent withprocedures approvedbyEPA, including the date of publication of such notice. Numerous newspapers 8/21/08-9/3/08 9/17/08 Affidavit of Publication 8/13/08 Public Notice

(g) Certification thatpublic hearings(s) were held in accordance with the informationprovided in thepublic notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 2/2/09 A.G.'s Opinion 10/7/08 Certification of PU

# 9 11,'C Hearing \

(h) Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. Yes

- inHearing Record2.2 Technical Support

(a) Identification of all regulated pollutants affectedby the plan. 2/20/09 Revision Summary

(b) Identification of the locations of All of ND is attainment. affected sources including theEPA 8/15/08 Rule RevisionAnalysis and attainment/nonattainment designation of Assessment the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected
areas(s)

. (c) Quantificationof the changes in No changes in emissions. plan allowable emissions from the See 8/15/08 Rule RevisionAnalysis affected sources; estimates of changes andAssessment in current actual emission from affected
sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emission from affected sources through calculations of the differences between certainbaseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. (d) The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, andvisibility, as applicable, areprotected if theplan is approved and implemented. See 11/17/08 Response toEPA's comments in the Hearing Record.

(e) Modeling information required to No new modeling necessary for general support theproposed revision, including revisions. input data, output data, models used, justificationof model selections, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assumptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. (f) Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are based on continuous emission reduction technology. N/A

(g) Evidence that the plan contains See 11/17/08 Response to EPA's emission limitations, workpractice comments and 2/20/09 Revision standards and recordkeeping/reporting Summary. requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. (h) Compliance/enforcement strategies, including how compliancewill be determined inpractice. See 11/17/08 Response to EPA's comments in the Hearing Record.

(i) Special economic and technological justifications requiredby any applicable EPA policies. N/A