alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2012055EN.01000101.xml

| 24.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 55/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 55/1

---

COUNCIL DECISION

of 10 February 2012

appointing and replacing members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

2012/C 55/01

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 337/75 of 10 February 1975 establishing the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training, and in particular Article 4 thereof (1),

1

Having regard to the nomination submitted to the Council by the Commission in the category of Employees’ representatives,

Whereas:

| (1) | By its Decision of 14 September 2009 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2009 to 17 September 2012. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

By its Decision of 14 September 2009 (2), the Council appointed the members of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the period from 18 September 2009 to 17 September 2012.

2

| (2) | A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employees’ representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Aleksi KALENIUS, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

A member's seat on the Governing Board of the Centre in the category of Employees’ representatives has become vacant as a result of the resignation of Mr Aleksi KALENIUS,

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Sole Article

The following person is hereby appointed as a member of the Governing Board of the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training for the remainder of the term of office, which runs until 17 September 2012:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES’ ORGANISATIONS:

REPRESENTATIVES OF EMPLOYEES’ ORGANISATIONS:

| FINLAND | Mr Erkki LAUKKANEN
  Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions SAK,
  Confederation of Salaried Employees STTK,
  Confederation of Unions for Professional and Managerial Staff in Finland AKAVA |
| --- | --- |

FINLAND

Mr Erkki LAUKKANEN

Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions SAK,

Confederation of Salaried Employees STTK,

Confederation of Unions for Professional and Managerial Staff in Finland AKAVA

Done at Brussels, 10 February 2012.

For the Council

The President

C. ANTORINI

---

(1)  OJ L 39, 13.2.1975, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ C 226, 19.9.2009, p. 2.

2

---
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**916 KA 11-01410** 
PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVELL SCOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (MISHA A. COULSON OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County (John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered May 16, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]). We reject defendant’s contention that Supreme Court erred in refusing to charge the jury with the lesser included offense of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree (§ 220.03). “A lesser included offense may not be submitted unless there appears on the whole record ‘some identifiable, rational basis’ for the jury to reject evidence supportive of the greater crime yet accept so much of the evidence as would establish the lesser” ( People v Palmer , 216 AD2d 883, 884, lv denied 86 NY2d 799, quoting People v Scarborough , 49 NY2d 364, 369). Here, the People presented expert testimony that the cocaine recovered from defendant weighed in excess of 1,400 milligrams, which is nearly triple the weight requirement for a conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree ( see § 220.06 [5]). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to defendant ( see People v Rivera , 23 NY3d 112, 120- 121, citing People v Martin , 59 NY2d 704, 705; People v Moultrie , 100 AD3d 401, 402, lv denied 20 NY3d 1102), we conclude that “[t]here was no basis, other than sheer speculation, for the jury to find that the chemist inaccurately weighed the drugs, or to otherwise reject the portion of [her] testimony concerning the weight of the substance, while at the same time accepting the portion of [her] testimony identifying the substance” ( People v Johnson , 66 AD3d 537, 538; see**-2- 916 KA 11-01410** 

Moultrie , 100 AD3d at 402; Palmer , 216 AD2d at 884). We therefore conclude that there is no reasonable view of the evidence that defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater ( see People
v Demus , 82 AD3d 1667, 1668, lv denied 17 NY3d 815; People v Bolden
, 70 AD3d 1352, 1353, lv denied 14 NY3d 838).

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Kelly Sundberg                                                     |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                  |
| Name:  | Kelly Sundberg                                                        |
|   |                                                                  |
| Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                  |
| Date:  | August 11, 2009                                                       |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### Health Resources and Services Administration

# AGENCY:

Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services.

# ACTION:

Notice; amended notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        HRSA published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         of July 23, 2024, concerning a meeting of the National Advisory Council on Migrant Health on October 22, 2024, and October 23, 2024. The notice states the meeting will be held in-person and via webinar. However, due to the impact of recent hurricanes on council members, this meeting now will be held via webinar only on Zoom.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Liz Rhee, National Advisory Council on Migrant Health Designated Federal Official, Office of Policy and Program Development, Bureau of Primary Health Care, HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857; 301-443-1082 or                         *hrsabphcoppdnacmh@hrsa.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Amended Notice of Meeting

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     Notice of July 23, 2024, FR Doc. 2024-16119, page 59744, column 1, section 2, paragraph 3, amend the sentences “This meeting will be held in-person and via webinar. The address of the meeting is 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857” to read: “This meeting will be held via webinar only.” In paragraph 8, delete the following sentences: “Since this meeting occurs in a federal government building, attendees must go through a security check to enter the building. Non-U.S. citizen attendees must notify HRSA of their planned attendance at least 20 business days prior to the meeting to facilitate their entry into the building. All attendees are required to present government-issued identification prior to entry.”                

Amy P. McNulty,

Deputy Director, Executive Secretariat.

[FR Doc. 2024-24165 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 18, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 30, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 414 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 83929)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-777, K2024-70.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-23999 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
SERVED FEBRUARY 24, 2010 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 


WASHINGTON, DC 


--,_._----­

IN THE MATTER OF 

AERO TIRE & TANK LLC 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP08SWOOll 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

DMS No. FAA-2008-1307 

AMENDED PROCEDURAL ORDER 

Paragraph #2 ofthe Procedural Order is amended as follows: 

WHEREFORE, the parties be and are hereby ORDERED to adhere to the 

following procedural schedule: 

... On or before May 1, 2010, the parties shall conclude all discovery including, 

but not limited to, depositions, document production, responses to production 

requests and/or interrogatories. Ifthe parties cannot resolve a discovery dispute 

they shall submit the dispute to the undersigned for resolution in a timely ] 

manner... 

..:.....'............ C. Goodwin 

U.S. Administrative Law Judge 

Attachment - Service List 

I The court does not anticipate scheduling this case prior to I May 20IO. 
FAA Docket No. CP08SWOOll 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COpy 

Hearing Docket 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington,DC 20591 

Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building - Room 20141 

ONE COPY 

Derrick J. Hahn 

Counsel for Respondent 

900 Jackson Street, Suite 180 

Dallas, TX 75202 

TEL: (214) 744-3200 

FAX: (214) 744.;3202 

Rena M. Price, Senior Attorney 

Safety Enforcement Branch 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel· 

Southwest Region, ASW -7E 1 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Fort Worth, TX 76137-0007 

TEL: (817) 222-5068 

FAX: (817) 222-5945 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin 

Office ofHearings,M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

TEL: (202) 366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 

(202) 366-5121 Legal Assistant 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the follo.wing address: 

Hearing Docket, Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building - Room 

2014, Washington, DC 20591, Att: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGG430.
Disclosure of Information on Lead-Based Paint and/or Lead-Based Paint Hazards

Lead Warning Statement

Housing built before 1978 may contain lead-based paint. Lead from paint, paint chips, and dust can pose

health hazards if not managed properly. Lead exposure is especially harmful to young children and pregnant

women. Before renting pre-1978 housing, lessors must disclose the presence of known lead-based paint and/or

lead-based paint hazards in the dwelling. Lessees must also receive a federally approved pamphlet on lead 

poisoning prevention.

Lessor’s Disclosure

(a) Presence of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards (check (i) or (ii) below):

(i) ______ Known lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards are present in the housing

(explain).

_______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

(ii) _____ Lessor has no knowledge of lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in the

housing.

(b) Records and reports available to the lessor (check (i) or (ii) below):

(i) ______ Lessor has provided the lessee with all available records and reports pertaining to

lead-based paint and/or lead-based paint hazards in the housing (list documents

below).

_______________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________

(ii) _____ Lessor has no reports or records pertaining to lead-based paint and/or lead-based

paint hazards in the housing.

Lessee’s Acknowledgment (initial)

(c) ________ Lessee has received copies of all information listed above.

(d) ________ Lessee has received the pamphlet Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home.

Agent’s Acknowledgment (initial)

(e) ________ Agent has informed the lessor of the lessor’s obligations under 42 U.S.C. 4852d and

is aware of his/her responsibility to ensure compliance.

Certification of Accuracy

The following parties have reviewed the information above and certify, to the best of their knowledge, that

the information they have provided is true and accurate.

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________

Lessor Date Lessor Date

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________

Lessee Date Lessee Date

__________________________________________________ __________________________________________________

Agent Date Agent Date
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83919]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24080]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 10, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
388 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-63, K2025-61.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24080 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Featured           ORNL Water Power Projects Showcased in New Report           

Featured           New method monitors grid stability with hydropower project signals         

Featured           Improving understanding of greenhouse gas emissions from reservoirs         

# About Us | Waterpower

### Contact

Shih-ChiehKao

kaos@ornl.gov

##  

## Why Water Power?

With millions of miles of natural waterways across the US, water power is a readily available and consistent source of renewable energy. Already accounting for almost 7 percent of total electricity generation, water power is uniquely capable of filling in the gaps between traditional electricity sources and other intermittent renewable sources such as wind and sun. Water power can also be stored and, in fact, is the largest source of utility-scale energy storage in the country. As a result, water power can play a crucial role in balancing the needs of a more reliable and sustainable electric power grid with that of a thriving and sustainable environment.

### **Our Mission**

ORNL will enhance and accelerate the contributions of water power in facilitating more reliable, resilient, sustainable and affordable electric power sources, infrastructure, and systems.

### **Research & Development**

Our research focuses on reducing costs and improving performance of existing hydropower facilities and accelerating advances in new, sustainable water power technologies. ORNL’s strengths in data analytics, materials science, and environmental science provide a full complement of resources. 

## Research Priorities

View a hi-res version of this image

### Reliability & Performance

View a hi-res version of this image

### Grid Integrations & Markets

View a hi-res version of this image

### Hydrology & Climate

View a hi-res version of this image

### Biodiversity & Ecosystem

View a hi-res version of this image

### Hydraulics & Water Management

View a hi-res version of this image

### Marine Energy

## Expertise

## National Water-Energy Data

## Optimization Decision-making Tools

## Early-stage Technologies

## Environmental Synthesis

## High-performance Computing

## Advanced Manufacturing

Water Power Fact Sheet

## Women in Water Power

Women in Water Power

## Current Research

## Publication

  Costs of mitigating the environmental impacts of hydropower projects in the United States...

## News

Fish story: Researchers use 3D printing, sensors to create models for hydropower testing

## Publication

  2020 Cost Analysis of Hydropower Options at Non-Powered Dams...

## Blog

ORNL develops new capability to evaluate human-driven change in Eastern U.S. streams

## Current Research

## News

ORNL Water Power Projects Showcased in New Report  

## News

New method monitors grid stability with hydropower project signals

## News

Improving understanding of greenhouse gas emissions from reservoirs

## News

Interns explore a future in lab-based environmental research
[No. 25181-7-II.

Division Two.

December 8, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Rosanna Ruth Blair, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 99-1-00270-6, Randolph Furman, J., entered August 24, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Penoyar, J. Pro Tern., concurred in by Morgan and Bridgewater, JJ.
#### Anna Sundelof *vs.*Simco Trading Co. Inc.

February 9, 1939.

*H. S. Avery, (S. P. Weston*with him,) for the plaintiff.

*J. M. Graham,*for the defendant.

Exceptions overruled. The plaintiff’s requests for rulings, numbered 5 and 6, were properly denied, since they asked rulings as to the legal effect of a part only of the facts which might have been found, bearing upon the conduct of the defendant's servant. The plaintiff’s request numbered 10 was properly denied, since it could not be ruled as matter of law that the defendant’s servant was negligent.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6377

CHRISTOPHER ARENDS RUSSELL,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

BENNIE BRIGMAN, Superintendent, Bladen County

North Carolina Correctional Unit,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief

District Judge. (CA-93-416-V)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North

Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1997.) We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the

appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Russell v. Brigman,

No. CA-93-416-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED