alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### McKenzie, Respondent, vs. Clear Lake Union Free High School District No. 1 and others, Appellants.

*February 18*

March *29, 1948.*

*328For the appellants there was a brief by *Doar &-Knowles*of New Richmond, and oral argument by *W. T. Doar.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *Nelton & McGinnis*of Balsam Lake.

Hughes, J.

The purpose of'the summary-judgment statute was primarily to discourage dilatory pleading and practice. *Prime Mfg. Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp.*(1938) 229 Wis. 348, 281 N. W. 697.

The statute is drastic and should be applied only where it is perfectly plain that there is no substantial issue to be tried. *Prime Mfg. Co. v. A. F. Gallun & Sons Corp., supra; Marco v. Whiting*(1944), 244 Wis. 621, 12 N. W. (2d) *926; Parish v. Awschu Properties, Inc.,*(1945) 247 Wis. 166, 19 N. W. (2d) 276.

*329This court has held that defenses in abatement of an action may be raised by motion for summary judgment. *Binsfeld v. Home Mut. Ins. Co.*(1944) 245 Wis. 552, 15 N. W. (2d) 828.

No case has been called to our attention authorizing use of the motion before complaint.

In connection with the appeal from the order denying the motion for summary judgment, the appellants ask this court to review the trial court’s order denying the motion to suppress the subpoenas directing defendants to appear before a court commissioner for discovery examination pursuant to sec. 326.12 (4), Stats. Such an order by itself is not appealable, and since the motion for summary judgment goes only to the question of whether the pleadings show clearly that there is no merit either to the plaintiff’s cause of action or to the defense set up to such cause of action, it does not make this intermediate order of the trial court reviewable at the present time.

The appeal from the order of the county court denying the motion to suppress the subpoenas is therefore dismissed. The order denying the motion for summary judgment is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Appeal from the order denying the motion to suppress is dismissed; the order denying the motion for summary judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 17-2007 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Matthew A.
      JonesName:
            Matthew
      A. JonesTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            May
      14, 2009
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, Daulat Nijjar, President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Principal Financial Officer of Dakota Gold Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended January 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results  of operations of the Company.








Date: March 14, 2011





/s/ Daulat Nijjar

Daulat Nijjar

President, Chief Executive Officer,

Secretary, and Treasurer

(Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)








This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Vera Pollock *vs.*Philip Swartz.

February 10, 1939.

*F. L. Simpson, {N. Richman*with him,) for the defendant.

*M. Horowitz, (J. E. Levine*with him,) for the plaintiff.

Exceptions overruled. Ordinarily a motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence is addressed to the discretion of the trial judge, and an exception will not lie to the denial of such a motion. *Madden*v. *Boston Elevated Railway,*284 Mass. 490, 494. There is nothing in this record to take the case out of the ordinary rule. The judge was not required to believe the affidavits in whole or in part even though they were uncontradicted. *Hanson*v. *Hanson,*258 Mass. 45, 46. *Commonwealth*v. *Millen,*290 Mass. 406, 410. *Germain*v. *Raad,*297 Mass. 73, 75. Even though he accepted them as true, he was not required to find that the evidence therein referred to “was not available to the defendant by the exercise of reasonable diligence and inquiry” for introduction at the trial. In the absence of proof of this fact, it clearly was not error to deny the motion. See *Sherman*v. *Collingwood,*221 Mass. 8, 14; *Berggren*v. *Mutual Life Ins. Co.*231 Mass. 173, 176; *Nicholas*v. *Lewis Furniture Co.*292 Mass. 500, 507. Nothing in *Davis*v. *Boston Elevated Railway,*235 Mass. 482, relied on by the defendant, requires a different conclusion. Other considerations bearing on the propriety of the denial of the motion need not be considered. See, however, *Sherman*v. *Collingwood,*221 Mass. 8, 14. Clearly there was no abuse of discretion.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE
  1.
    
    the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended September 30,
2007 (the Report), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date: November 8, 2007/s/ Robert S. Taylor

Robert S. Taylor
Executive Vice President, Treasurer and Chief
Financial Officer
Superior Energy Services, Inc.
EXHIBIT 35.1  ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB

CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer pursuant to Section 3.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012 (the Sale and
Servicing Agreement) among CarMax Auto Owner Trust 2012-3, as Issuer (the Issuer), CarMax Auto Funding LLC, as Depositor, CarMax Business Services, LLC, as Servicer (the Servicer), and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Backup Servicer, does hereby certify that:



| | 1. | CarMax Business Services, LLC is, as of the date hereof, the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officers Certificate.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period beginning on October 11, 2012 and ending on February 28, 2013 and of the Servicers performance under
the Sale and Servicing Agreement was made under my supervision. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout such
period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Capitalized terms used in this
certificate and not otherwise defined herein have the meanings assigned to them in the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of the Servicer, has duly executed this Officers Certificate this 24th day of May, 2013.



CARMAX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC/s/ Thomas W. ReedyThomas W. Reedy
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Treasurer
#### Rucinski (Veronica), Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. Kuehl, Defendant: Minnesota Farmers Mutual Casualty Company, Defendant and Appellant: Rucinski (Joseph) and another, Defendants and Respondents.

*December 6, 1954*

January *11, 1955.*

*383For the appellant there was a brief by *Graves & Chambers*of Wisconsin Rapids, and oral argument by *R. B. Graves.*

For the respondents Hartford Accident & Indemnity Insurance Company and Joseph Rucinski there was a brief and oral argument by *M. S. King*of Wisconsin Rapids.

For the respondent Veronica Rucinski there was oral argument by *Richard S. Brazeau*of Wisconsin Rapids.

Martin, J.

Appellant served no notice of appeal upon Kuehl. Plaintiff and defendants Hartford Accident & Indemnity Insurance Company and Joseph Rucinski move this court for dismissal of the appeal on the ground of noncompliance with sec. 274.11 (1), Stats., which provides for appeals to the supreme court as follows:

> “An appeal is taken by serving a notice of appeal signed by the appellant or his attorney on each party adverse to him upon the appeal who appeared in the action or proceeding, and on the clerk of the court in which the judgment or order appealed from is entered, stating whether the appeal is from the whole or from a part thereof, and if from a part only, specifying the part appealed from. On appeals from a judgment the appellant shall serve the notice of appeal upon all parties bound by the judgment who have appeared in the action.”

*384Appellant contends that Arnold Kuehl, being its insured, is not an adverse party and that the statute was fully complied with by service on Hartford Accident & Indemnity In-suranceCompany and Joseph Rucinski. We cannot agree.

The statute provides that “On appeals from a judgment the appellant, shall serve the notice of appeal upon all parties bound by the judgment who have appeared in the action.” The language is definite and unambiguous. Kuehl appeared in the action. Kuehl was bound by the judgment.

The question presented is governed by *Donny v. Chain of Lakes Cheese Co.*(1948), 254 Wis. 85, 87, 88, 35 N. W. (2d) 333, where, in an opinion by Mr. Chief Justice Rosen-berry, it is stated:

> “It will be noted that the only one of the plaintiffs who appealed or attempted to appeal from the judgment was Melchior Donny. Although the notice of appeal is signed by Attorney Koenig as attorney for all the plaintiffs, Donny’s coplaintiffs did not join in the appeal, and the question is: Was it necessary for the notice of appeal to be served upon the plaintiffs William Yardley, W. A. Yardley, and Harry L. Rickard? ...

> “After the plaintiff Donny took the appeal in which his coplaintiffs did not join, their interests upon the record were adverse. So far as the record discloses the plaintiffs, other than Donny, were satisfied with the judgment and did not wish to appeal. Nevertheless they had a right of appeal and under the plain language of the statute it was necessary for the appellant Donny to serve the notice of appeal on his co-plaintiffs who were bound with him by the judgment in order to give this court jurisdiction.”

*By the Court.*— Appeal dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Riverdale Mining Inc.(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Vladimir Vaskevich, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated this 12th day of November, 2008.



| | VLADIMIR VASKEVICH                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Vladimir Vaskevich,                                
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer











---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-LC5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

  | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
Exhibit
99.4

















Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm








We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 40-F for the year ended December 31, 2019 of Denison Mines
Corp. of our report dated March 5, 2020, relating to the
consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, which appears in the Exhibit 99.3
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form
40-F.





We also
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Forms S-8 (No. 333-48174, No. 333-148915, No.
333-190121 and 33-224641) of Denison Mines Corp. of our report
dated March 5, 2020 referred to above. We also consent to reference
to us under the heading “Names and Interests of
Experts,” which appears in the Annual Information Form which
appears in the Exhibit 99.1 incorporated by reference in this
Annual Report on Form 40-F, which is incorporated by reference in
such Registration Statements.











(Signed) "PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP"





Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public
Accountants





Toronto, Ontario,
Canada


March 13,
2020











PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
 PwC
Tower, 18 York Street, Suite 2600, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5J
0B2
 T: +1 416
863 1133, F: +1 416 365 8215, www.pwc.com/ca
 
 “PwC” refers to
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an Ontario limited liability
partnership, which is a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers
International Limited, each a member firm of which is a separate
legal entity.
|   |  (1) |   |  The      Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period      ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange      Act of 1934, as amended; and |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|   |  (2) |   |  The      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and      results of operations of the Company. |   |
|--------|-----------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|

|                              |                                                                      |                         |
|-----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                              |  CAPITAL EQUITY FINANCE,      INC.(Registrant)                       |
|                              |                                                                      |                         |
|  Date:      October 20, 2008 |  By:                                                                 |  /s/      Luz M. Weigel |
|                              | Luz      M. Weigel                                                        |
|                              | President,      Secretary and Treasurer(Principal      Executive Officer) |
# C_2012192EN.01000301.xml

| 30.6.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 192/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 192/3

---

DECLARATION BY THE COUNCIL

2012/C 192/02

The Council reminds the Commission that it is required under Article 25(1) of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, as regards appointments to the EFSA Management Board, to draw up a list which includes a number of candidates substantially higher than the number of members to be appointed and which provides the Council with a choice as regards both the members with a background in organisations representing consumers and other interests in the food chain and other members of the Board. It calls on the Commission to take the necessary measures to ensure full compliance with these requirements when drawing up lists for future appointments to the Board.

---
# L_2011345DE.01003503.xml

| 29.12.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 345/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.12.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 345/35

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 797/2011 der Kommission vom 9. August 2011 zur Genehmigung des Wirkstoffs Spiroxamin gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1107/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über das Inverkehrbringen von Pflanzenschutzmitteln und zur Änderung des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 540/2011 der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 205 vom 10. August 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 205 vom 10. August 2011

Auf Seite 6, Anhang I, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“, Teil B:

anstatt:

„Die Genehmigungsbedingungen müssen gegebenenfalls Maßnahmen zur Risikobegrenzung umfassen.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Zulassungsbedingungen müssen gegebenenfalls Maßnahmen zur Risikobegrenzung umfassen.“

---
#### Elmer Webb, Appellee, v. Dean Ferkins, Appellant.

No. 45091.

Note: This case, decided February 13, 1940, is a companion to Webb v. Ferkins, 227 Iowa 1157, 290 N. W. 112, and controlled by the opinion thereof.
Exhibit 32.1











CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Lake Victoria Mining Company, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period end of June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Roger A. Newell, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 12th day of August, 2010.








ROGER A. NEWELLRoger A. NewellChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of China Prosperous Clean Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,Wei Wang,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|                         |   |                              |
|------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------|
|                         |   |                              |
| Date: November 19, 2008 |   | /s/Wei Wang                       |
|                         |   | Wei Wang

Chief Executive Officer |
|                         |   |                              |