alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 I, Mark A. Culhane, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of DemandTec, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b.
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC Release 34-47986]c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: January 11, 2008
    
    /s/ Mark A. Culhane

Mark A. CulhaneExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# L_2015068EN.01009002.xml

| 13.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 68/90 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 68/90

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2011 of 27 October 2011 amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 2160/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 as regards salmonella in fresh poultry meat

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 281 of 28 October 2011
  )

On page 8, recital 13 and on page 10, in the Annex, point (1), footnote 21 to the table:

for:

‘1,4,[5],12:i:-’,

read:

‘
  1,4,[5],12:i:-’.

1

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED APRIL 28, 2017

NO. 03-14-00677-CR

Thaung Tin, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 147TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the district court. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

district court’s judgment of conviction. Therefore, the Court affirms the district court’s

judgment of conviction. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of 

costs is made.
#### READ. v. STATE.

No. 13879.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 7, 1931.

*270McGaugh & Darroch, of Brownwood, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction, for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

We deem the evidence sufficient to justify the conclusion of guilt Officers made affidavit for a search warrant, the affidavit containing the statement that each of the makers had been told by a party that a still was being operated in the house sought to be searched. The officers reached the house about night,, and soon afterwards appellant' appeared in a car, got out, went to the door of the house, unlocked it and went in. The officers followed, and found in the house a still operating and manufacturing whisky, and in the room was a quantity of manufactured whisky.

 There are three bills of exception in the record. Bills 1 and 2 complain of the reception of the testimony of the two officers who conducted the search. Substantially the same objection appears in each bill. We áre of opinion that the affidavit for the search warrant sufficiently disclosed the facts upon which the makers of the affidavit relied. We are also of opinion that the premises desired to be searched are described with sufficient particularity in the affidavit and the search warrant. The fact that the affidavit asserted the name of the owner of the premises upon which the whisky was being manufactured as Danie Whitt, and that the officers believed they were going to search the premises of Danie Whitt at the time they made the affidavit, would in no sense operate to the benefit of this appellant, who did not testify or dispute the ownership of the premises in said Whitt. The question of his guilt, and the admissibility of testimony to support same would depend upon whether the proof showed him to be the party in possession of such premises, and'operating the still found therein, and engaged in the manufacture of intoxicating liquor. Appellant told the officers when they found him at the premises and arrested him that his name was Bain.

The third bill of exceptions complains of the court’s action in declining to grant an application for continuance. The application appears to be wholly lacking in diligence in so far asi it was based on the absence of witnesses; and, in so far as it was based upon the absence of an attorney claimed to have been employed by appellqnt to represent him, the bill wholly fails to show sufficiently, first, that said attorney had been employed to represent appellant; second, that said attorney was kept away by circumstances beyond his control; and, third, that injury resulted.

The record shows that the attorney referred to was notified by counsel for the state of the setting of the ease, and there is nothing in the record showing that he was ill or that he intended to come, or had made any effort 1⁄8 appear and represent appellant. The diligence to procure the presence of the witnesses referred to seems insufficient.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
-   
              -  Nuclear Fuel Development Section OverviewRead More 

# Fuel Development Section

We leverage world-class expertise in nuclear materials science and engineering to design, fabricate, irradiate, characterize, and model performance of nuclear fuels and materials for nuclear energy, national security, and industrial customers.

Our team is an agile domestic source for the design of new irradiation experiments and measurement methods for nuclear environments, development of new fuel materials, rapid deployment of experiments at the High Flux Isotope Reactor, and novel post irradiation examination.

Nuclear Fuel Section Overview - Poster

## Nuclear Fuel Development Section Leadership

View a hi-res version of this image

**Christian M. Petrie**Group LeaderAdvanced Fuel Fabrication and Instrumentation Group

View a hi-res version of this image

**Richard H. Howard**Group LeaderIrradiation Engineering Group

View a hi-res version of this image

**Jason M. Harp**Group LeaderNuclear Fuel Element Performance Group

View a hi-res version of this image

**N. Dianne B. Ezell**Group LeaderNuclear and Extreme Environment Measurement Group

View a hi-res version of this image

**Tyler J. Gerczak**Group LeaderParticle Fuel Forms Group

## Nuclear Fuel Development Program Leadership

View a hi-res version of this image

**Nathan A. Capps**Program ManagerAdvanced Fuels Campaign

View a hi-res version of this image

**John D. Hunn**Program ManagerAdvanced Gas Reactor Program

View a hi-res version of this image

**Kory D. Linton**Program ManagerNuclear Science User Facility - ORNL

### Contact

AndrewT Nelson

nelsonat@ornl.gov
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | CMBS Department

 

MAC N9401-011

1055 10th Avenue SE

Minneapolis, MN 55414 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C6,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Custodian ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

March 1, 2016

/s/ Gail Vannest

GAIL VANNEST

Vice President

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 31.1

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**

I, Shawn Englmann, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 of Belvedere Resources Corporation.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition results  and cash flows of the registrant as of, and  for the periods presented in this report.

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

5.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 19, 2008

*“Shawn Englmann”*
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal EmployeesRetirement Group Life Health Benefits RetirementSystem Insurance Program System

United StatesOffice ofPersonnel ManagementThe Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance ServiceFinancial Management Letter

                                                  Number: F-00-09                                                          Date : November 17, 2000

SUBJECT: FISCAL YEAR 2000 INTRAGOVERNMENTAL ACCOUNTBALANCES

The purpose of this letter is to provide you, our “trading partners”, with the fiscal year2000 intragovernmental account balances for the civilian employee benefit programs.  Ihave attached the revenue and asset balances to which you must reconcile yourbalances in the reciprocal expense and liability accounts.  

We are extending the deadline for submitting your Confirmation of IntragovernmentalAccount Balances to December 27, 2000.

We are hopeful that the initial comparison of our corresponding account balancerecords will result in few differences.  If the process does generate material differences,however, we still intend to contact you no later than January 12, 2001 to resolve andadjust.

We regret any inconvenience our delay has caused you and look forward to workingwith you on the reconciliation.  If you need detailed transaction information tofacilitate the reconciliation, please call Mike Finucan on (202) 606-8083 or LutherBradford on (202) 606-4846.   We would prefer that you direct general questions tous at finance@opm.gov, so that we may retain a record. 

Robert A. Yuran, ChiefFinancial Policy StaffRetirement and Insurance Service

Attachment

mailto:finance@opm.gov
##### 



Exhibit 13.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report Of Foreign Private Issuer pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 by Satélites
Mexicanos, S.A. de C.V. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Lauro González Moreno, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, that to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18
U.S.C.§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /S/  LAURO GONZÁLEZ MORENOLauro González MorenoChief Executive OfficerJuly 15, 2004
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

 FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

ANTHONY S. DESTEFANO,

Appellant,

v. Case No. 5D18-1521

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

________________________________/

Opinion filed August 17, 2018

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Osceola County,

Elaine A. Barbour, Judge.

Anthony S. Destefano, South Bay, pro se.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Marjorie Vincent-Tripp, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Anthony S. DeStefano appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction 

relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm as to Grounds 

Two through Five. However, because the record does not conclusively refute 

DeStefano’s claim that counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s 

comments on the law applicable to his sentencing, we reverse the summary denial of 

Ground One and remand for attachment of portions of the record conclusively refuting 
2

that claim or for an evidentiary hearing. See Freeman v. State, 761 So. 2d 1055, 1061 

(Fla. 2000) ("[A] defendant is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a postconviction relief

motion unless (1) the motion, files, and records in the case conclusively show that the 

prisoner is entitled to no relief, or (2) the motion or a particular claim is legally insufficient."

(citing Maharaj v. State, 684 So. 2d 726 (Fla. 1996))).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED.

ORFINGER, BERGER, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 24-0044

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

vs. 

ROBERT DUNKERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including June 24, 2024, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 15 2024

05/15/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0044
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Melissa Lopez                                        |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Melissa Lopez                                                  |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Chairman of the Board and Director |
|  Date:     |  March 9, 2010                                                  |
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: April 21, 2016 521428 

________________________________

In the Matter of the Claim of 

FRANK C. SARSON, 

Appellant.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, 

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 23, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ.

__________

Frank C. Sarson, Albany, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City

(Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal

Board, filed August 8, 2014, which ruled, among other things,

that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment

insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to

misconduct.

Substantial evidence supports the decision of the

Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, a

utility worker with a food service company, lost his employment

due to misconduct (see Matter of Shafer [Commissioner of Labor],

107 AD3d 1280, 1280 [2013]). The record establishes that

claimant was discharged from his employment following an

investigation by the employer into complaints that he made racial

slurs to a coworker, which was in violation of a known policy of

the employer. "It is well settled that violating a known policy

of an employer can constitute disqualifying misconduct . . ., as

can offensive behavior in the workplace (Matter of Manno
-2- 521428 

[Commissioner of Labor], 8 AD3d 869, 869 [2004]; see Matter of

Rivers [Federation Empl. & Guidance Serv.–Commissioner of Labor],

44 AD3d 1191, 1192 [2007]; Matter of Sarmiento [Newsday, Inc.–

Commissioner of Labor, 287 AD2d 851, 852 [2001]). Although

claimant denied making any racial remarks, this presented a

credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Mulea

[Commissioner of Labor], 23 AD3d 753, 754 [2005]). Furthermore,

given that claimant indicated on his application for unemployment

insurance benefits that he was discharged due to lack of work,

the Board's finding that claimant made a willful false statement

to obtain benefits and its imposition of recoverable overpayments

of benefits will not be disturbed (see Matter of Campon

[Commissioner of Labor], 122 AD3d 1228, 1229 [2014]). 

Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. 

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 00-6944

JAMES L. JACK, Petitioner - Appellant, versusRONALD J. ANGELONE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections; A. DAVID ROBINSON, Warden, Nottoway Correctional Center, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-00-69-3) Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 29, 2000 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James L. Jack, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Thomas Judge, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).* The parties consented to have this matter decided by a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994). 2 PER CURIAM: James L. Jack seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). * We have reviewed the record and the opinion of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Jack v. Angelone, No. CA-00-69-3 (E.D. Va. June 21, 2000). We deny Jack’s motion for transfer of custody. We dispense with oral argument because thefacts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED