81938 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 9, 2024 / Notices 

1A record of the Commissioners’ votes, the 

Commission’s statement on adequacy, and any 

individual Commissioner’s statements will be 

available from the Office of the Secretary and at the 

Commission’s website. 

2Commissioner Johanson voted to conduct full 

reviews. 

3The Commission has found the response 

submitted on behalf of Magnum Magnetic 

Corporation to be individually adequate. Comments 

from other interested parties will not be accepted 

(see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). 

Western Heritage Museum. In 2013, the 

individuals were encountered by 

volunteer staff at the NMJC. The land 

from which the individuals were 

removed is under the control of the 

BLM and was at the time of removal. 

The NMJC has no knowledge or record 

of any potentially hazardous substances 

being used to treat the human remains. 

No associated funerary objects are 

present. 

Cultural Affiliation 

Based on the information available 

and the results of consultation, cultural 

affiliation is reasonably identified by the 

geographical location of the human 

remains described in this notice. 

Determinations 

The BLM and NMJC has determined 

that: 

• The human remains described in 

this notice represent the physical 

remains of four individuals of Native 

American ancestry. 

• There is a reasonable connection 

between the human remains described 

in this notice and the Apache Tribe of 

Oklahoma; Comanche Nation, 

Oklahoma; Fort McDowell Yavapai 

Nation, Arizona; Fort Sill Apache Tribe 

of Oklahoma; Hopi Tribe of Arizona; 

Jicarilla Apache Nation, New Mexico; 

Kiowa Indian Tribe of Oklahoma; 

Mescalero Apache Tribe of the 

Mescalero Reservation, New Mexico; 

Ohkay Owingeh, New Mexico; Pueblo of 

Acoma, New Mexico; Pueblo of Cochiti, 

New Mexico; Pueblo of Isleta, New 

Mexico; Pueblo of Jemez, New Mexico; 

Pueblo of Laguna, New Mexico; Pueblo 

of Nambe, New Mexico; Pueblo of 

Picuris, New Mexico; Pueblo of 

Pojoaque, New Mexico; Pueblo of San 

Felipe, New Mexico; Pueblo of San 

Ildefonso, New Mexico; Pueblo of 

Sandia, New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa 

Ana, New Mexico; Pueblo of Santa 

Clara, New Mexico; Pueblo of Taos, 

New Mexico; Pueblo of Tesuque, New 

Mexico; Pueblo of Zia, New Mexico; San 

Carlos Apache Tribe of the San Carlos 

Reservation, Arizona; Santo Domingo 

Pueblo; Tonto Apache Tribe of Arizona; 

White Mountain Apache Tribe of the 

Fort Apache Reservation, Arizona; 

Yavapai-Apache Nation of the Camp 

Verde Indian Reservation, Arizona; 

Ysleta del Sur Pueblo; and the Zuni 

Tribe of the Zuni Reservation, New 

Mexico. 

Requests for Repatriation 

Written requests for repatriation of the 

human remains in this notice must be 

sent to the authorized representative 

identified in this notice under 

ADDRESSES. Requests for repatriation 

may be submitted by: 

1. Any one or more of the Indian 

Tribes or Native Hawaiian organizations 

identified in this notice. 

2. Any lineal descendant, Indian 

Tribe, or Native Hawaiian organization 

not identified in this notice who shows, 

by a preponderance of the evidence, that 

the requestor is a lineal descendant or 

a culturally affiliated Indian Tribe or 

Native Hawaiian organization. 

Repatriation of the human remains in 

this notice to a requestor may occur on 

or after November 8, 2024. If competing 

requests for repatriation are received, 

the BLM and NMJC must determine the 

most appropriate requestor prior to 

repatriation. Requests for joint 

repatriation of the human remains are 

considered a single request and not 

competing requests. The BLM and 

NMJC is responsible for sending a copy 

of this notice to the Indian Tribes and 

Native Hawaiian organizations 

identified in this notice. 

Authority: Native American Graves 

Protection and Repatriation Act, 25 

U.S.C. 3003, and the implementing 

regulations, 43 CFR 10.10. 

Dated: September 30, 2024. 

Melanie O’Brien, 

Manager, National NAGPRA Program. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23371 Filed 10–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4312–52–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation Nos. 701–TA–452 and 731– 

TA–1129–1130 (Third Review)] 

Raw Flexible Magnets From China and 

Taiwan; Scheduling of Expedited FiveYear Reviews 

AGENCY: United States International 

Trade Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: The Commission hereby gives 

notice of the scheduling of expedited 

reviews pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether 

revocation of the countervailing duty 

order on raw flexible magnets from 

China and the antidumping duty orders 

on raw flexible magnets from China and 

Taiwan would be likely to lead to 

continuation or recurrence of material 

injury within a reasonably foreseeable 

time. 

DATES: September 6, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Alexis Yim (202–708–1446), Office of 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain 

information on this matter by contacting 

the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 

205–1810. Persons with mobility 

impairments who will need special 

assistance in gaining access to the 

Commission should contact the Office 

of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. 

General information concerning the 

Commission may also be obtained by 

accessing its internet server (https://

www.usitc.gov). The public record for 

this proceeding may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background.—On September 6, 2024, 

the Commission determined that the 

domestic interested party group 

response to its notice of institution (89 

FR 47607, June 3, 2024) of the subject 

five-year reviews was adequate and that 

the respondent interested party group 

response was inadequate. The 

Commission did not find any other 

circumstances that would warrant 

conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly, 

the Commission determined that it 

would conduct expedited reviews 

pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Act 

(19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).2

For further information concerning 

the conduct of these reviews and rules 

of general application, consult the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B 

(19 CFR part 201), and part 207, 

subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 

207). 

Staff report.—A staff report 

containing information concerning the 

subject matter of the reviews has been 

placed in the nonpublic record, and will 

be made available to persons on the 

Administrative Protective Order service 

list for these reviews on November 20, 

2024. A public version will be issued 

thereafter, pursuant to § 207.62(d)(4) of 

the Commission’s rules. 

Written submissions.—As provided in 

§ 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, 

interested parties that are parties to the 

reviews and that have provided 

individually adequate responses to the 

notice of institution,3 and any party 

other than an interested party to the 

reviews may file written comments with 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 9, 2024 / Notices 81939 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

5:15 p.m. on November 29, 2024, and 

may not contain new factual 

information. Any person that is neither 

a party to the five-year reviews nor an 

interested party may submit a brief 

written statement (which shall not 

contain any new factual information) 

pertinent to the reviews by November 

29, 2024. However, should the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) 

extend the time limit for its completion 

of the final results of its reviews, the 

deadline for comments (which may not 

contain new factual information) on 

Commerce’s final results is three 

business days after the issuance of 

Commerce’s results. If comments 

contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s Handbook on 

Filing Procedures, available on the 

Commission’s website at https://

www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_

on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 

upon the Commission’s procedures with 

respect to filings. 

In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 

207.3 of the rules, each document filed 

by a party to the reviews must be served 

on all other parties to the reviews (as 

identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined these reviews are 

extraordinarily complicated and 

therefore has determined to exercise its 

authority to extend the review period by 

up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Act; this notice is published 

pursuant to § 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 3, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23273 Filed 10–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1361] 

Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, 

Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices, and 

Hardware and Software Components 

Thereof; Notice of a Commission 

Determination To Grant a Joint Motion 

To Terminate the Investigation Based 

on a Settlement Agreement; 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to grant a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation based on a 

settlement agreement. The investigation 

is terminated in its entirety. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edward S. Jou, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3316. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 8, 2023, based on a complaint 

filed on behalf of Netgear Inc. of San 

Jose, California (‘‘Netgear’’). 88 FR 

29693–94 (May 8, 2023). The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain Wi-Fi routers, WiFi devices, mesh Wi-Fi network devices, 

and hardware and software components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

7,936,714 (‘‘the ’714 patent’’); 

10,681,698 (‘‘the ’698 patent’’); 

10,278,179 (‘‘the ’179 patent’’); 

9,468,205; 10,327,242; and 10,356,681. 

The complaint further alleged that a 

domestic industry exists. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents: TP-Link 

Technologies Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, 

China; TP-Link Corporation Limited, f/ 

k/a TP-Link International Limited of 

Kowloon, Hong Kong; TP-Link USA 

Corporation of Irvine, California; and 

TP-Link Research Institute USA Corp. 

d/b/a TP-Link Research America Corp. 

of San Jose, California (collectively, 

‘‘TP-Link’’). The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is not participating in this 

investigation. 

On May 30, 2024, the presiding 

administrative law judge issued a final 

initial determination finding a violation 

of section 337 with respect to claim 13 

of the ’714 patent and claims 12, 15, 17, 

and 19 of the ’698 patent, but no 

violation with respect to claim 11 of the 

’179 patent. 

On September 10, 2024, Netgear and 

TP-Link filed a joint motion to terminate 

the investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. On September 11, 2024, 

Netgear and TP-Link filed a public 

version of their joint motion to 

terminate, attaching a redacted version 

of their settlement agreement. 

The Commission has determined to 

grant the joint motion to terminate 

because it complies with the 

requirements of Commission Rule 

210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)). 

Specifically, the Commission finds that 

the joint motion includes confidential 

and public versions of the parties’ 

settlement agreement and a statement 

that ‘‘[o]ther than a stipulation regarding 

joint discovery cross-use in the 1405 

investigation and stipulations relating to 

procedural and discovery matters, 

importation and inventory, hearing 

procedures, and exhibits in this 

investigation,’’ there are no other 

agreements, written or oral, express or 

implied between the parties concerning 

the subject matter of the investigation. 

The Commission further finds that there 

are no extraordinary circumstances that 

would warrant denial of the requested 

termination, and termination would not 

be contrary to the public interest 

pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)). The 

investigation is hereby terminated in its 

entirety. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on October 3, 

2024. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES