alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

                        An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will                               ( print page 81989)                            be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.                    

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Tax Forms and Publications Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024, at 2:30 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Ann Tabat. For more information, please contact Ann Tabat at 1-888-912-1227 or (602) 636-9143, or write TAP Office, 4041 N. Central Ave Phoenix, AZ 85012 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include TAP 2024 committee project focus areas.                

Dated: October 1, 2024.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2024-23310 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the month of November 2007
 Commission File Number: 001-32179
 INTEROIL CORPORATION
  THE YUKON TERRITORY, CANADA
 60-92 COOK STREET
PORTSMITH, QLD 4870, AUSTRALIA
 (61) 7 4046 4600
  o þ
 o
 o
  o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESExhibit IndexManagement's Discussion & AnalysisUnaudited Consolidated Financial Statements    Table of Contents  
 SIGNATURES
  INTEROIL CORPORATIONBy:/s/ Phil MulacekPhil MulacekChief Executive OfficerDate: November 13, 2007




---



##### Table of Contents



INTEROIL CORPORATION
FORM 6-K FOR THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER 2007
 
 Exhibit Index
 1.
    
    Managements Discussion and Analysis for the quarter and nine month period ended September
30, 2007.2.
    
    Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for quarter and nine month period ended September
30, 2007 and 2006.
Page | 1

ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

City Code City

60029059 ALISO VIEJO

60080059 ANAHEIM

60191059 ATWOOD

60450059 BREA

60470059 BUENA PARK

60556059 CAPISTRANO BEACH

60880059 COSTA MESA

60888059 COTO DE CAZA

60960059 CYPRESS

60972059 DANA POINT

61155059 EL TORO

61345059 FOUNTAIN VALLEY

61380059 FULLERTON

61410059 GARDEN GROVE

61660059 HUNTINGTON BEACH

61713059 IRVINE

61780059 LAGUNA BEACH

61782059 LAGUNA HILLS

61785059 LADERA RANCH

61786059 LAGUNA NIGUEL

61790059 LA HABRA

61794059 LAKE FOREST

61842059 LA PALMA

61857059 LAS FLORES

61974059 LOS ALAMITOS

62089059 MARINE CORPS AIR STA

62091059 MARINE CORPS AIR FACIL

62160059 MIDWAY CITY

62199059 MISSION VIEJO

62400059 NEWPORT BEACH

62539059 OLIVE

62560059 ORANGE

62800059 PLACENTIA

62941059 RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA

63121059 ROSSMOOR

63250059 SAN CLEMENTE

63351059 SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO

63420059 SANTA ANA

63425059 SANTA ANA HEIGHTS

63558059 SEAL BEACH

63633059 SILVERADO

63695059 SOUTH LAGUNA

63760059 STANTON
Page | 2

City Code City

63791059 SUNSET BEACH

63796059 SURFSIDE

63875059 TRABUCO CANYON

63960059 TUSTIN

64045059 VILLA PARK

64130059 WESTMINSTER

64267059 YORBA LINDA
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C.20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 December 13, 2007 (December 12, 2007)
 Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-11727
(Commission File Number)
    
    73-1493906
(IRS Employer
Identification Number)
 3738 Oak Lawn Avenue,

Dallas, TX 75219
 (214) 981-0700
 
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
   -1-




---



##### 



Item 1.01
    
    Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
    Item 7.01
    
    Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 Financial Statements.
 Exhibits.
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description of the ExhibitExhibit 1.1
    
    Underwriting Agreement, dated December 12, 2007 by and among the
Partnership and the Underwriters.Exhibit 5.1
    
    Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. as to the legality of the Units.Exhibit 8.1
    
    Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. regarding tax matters.Exhibit 23.1
    
    Consent of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (included in its opinion filed in
exhibits 5.1 and 8.1)Exhibit 99.1
    
    Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. Press Release dated December 12, 2007.
 -2-




---



##### 



Signatures
  Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.By:
    Energy Transfer Partners GP, L.P.,its general partnerBy:
    Energy Transfer Partners, L.L.C.,its general partnerDate:   December 13, 2007
    /s/ Brian J. JenningsBrian J. JenningsChief Financial Officer -3-




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description of the ExhibitExhibit 1.1
    
    Underwriting Agreement, dated December 12, 2007 by and among the
Partnership and the Underwriters.Exhibit 5.1
    
    Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. as to the legality of the Units.Exhibit 8.1
    
    Opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. regarding tax matters.Exhibit 23.1
    
    Consent of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. (included in its opinion filed in
exhibits 5.1 and 8.1)Exhibit 99.1
    
    Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. Press Release dated December 12, 2007.
 -4-
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report ofBelvedere Resources Corporation(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Shawn Englmann, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 16th day of November, 2007.



SHAWN ENGLMANN
Shawn EnglmannChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
1

King, Melanie

Subject: FW: revised reg text TSD

Attachments: Reg Text TSD 28 May 2014 (Proposed Applicability).docx; Reg Text TSD 28 May 2014 

(Broad Applicability).docx

From: Culligan, Kevin  

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:04 PM

To: 'Higgins, Cortney'

Subject: FW: revised reg text TSD

In my checking, it looks like I had not sent this version.
NUMBER 13

- 13

- 003 98

- CV


### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ JOSEPH E. MCCLAIN III , APPELLANT,

v.
DELL, INC. AND SEATON CORP. D/B/A STAFF MANAGEMENT , APPELLEE.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 201st District Court of Travis County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Third Court of Appeals by order
of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a) (West Supp.
2011) (del ineating the jurisdiction of appellate courts); TEX.GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001
(West 2005) (granting the supreme court the authority to transfer cases from one court of2

appeals to another at any time that there is “good cause” for the transfer). The
appella nt's brief in the above cause was due on October 9, 2013 . On October 23, 20 13
, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the brief had not been timely filed and that the
appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appe llate
Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of the letter,
appellant reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured
by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. To date, no response has been received
from appellant.
Appellant has failed to either reasonably explai n his failure to file a brief, file a
motion for extension of time to file his brief, or file his brief. Accordingly, the appeal is

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.8(a), 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 26th day of November , 20 13

.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

** **

Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code), John R. Schwab, Chief Financial Officer of NCOGroup, Inc. (the “Company”) does hereby certify with respect to theQuarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31,2010 (the “Report”) that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.

 

 
| Date:  | May 14,  2010 |   | /s/  John R. Schwab      |
|--------|--------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|   |               |   | John  R. Schwab          |
|   |               |   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certificationis being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

 

----
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM 2012-CCRE4Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Emerald SquareMall Mortgage Loan, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Special Servicer for the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan,U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor for the Emerald Square MallMortgage Loan, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as ServicingFunction Participant for the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan, and NationalTax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the Emerald Square MallMortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 22, 2018

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

Inconnection with the accompanying Quarterly Report of CMR Mortgage Fund II, LLC(the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008(the “Report”), I, James Gala, Chief Executive Officer of California Mortgage andRealty, Inc., the manager of the Registrant, hereby certify pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002that:

 

(1)                                  the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                  the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Registrant.

 

 
| Dated: October 1, 2008 |    /s/ James Gala                                     |
|-----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        | James Gala                                                 |
|                        |                                                       |
|                        | Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer of    |
|                        | California Mortgage and Realty, Inc.,  the Manager of |
|                        | the Registrant                                             |

 

----
#### BENSAW v. STATE.

No. 17808.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 11, 1935.

Tom B. Bartlett, of Marlin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a fine of $100 and confinement in jail for ninety days.

The testimony of the state was to the effect that appellant attacked Eugene Williams and shot at him with a gun. It was appellant’s theory, given support in his testimony, that he shot in the air for the purpose of frightening the injured party.

Bill of exception No. 1 relates to the action of the court in permitting the injured party to testify. We find nothing in the bill showing that the witness was disqualified.

Bill of exception No. 5 relates to the action of the court in permitting the state to elicit from appellant on cross-examination that he had theretofore paid a fine for theft. This testimony was admissible for the purpose of impeaching appellant.

We are unable to agree with appellant that the evidence is insufficient.

A careful examination of the record leads us to the conclusion that reversible error is not presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal’ Appeals and approved by the court.
NO. 12-15-00063-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

IN RE:

ERIC MAULDIN, 

RELATOR

§

§

§

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

In this original proceeding, Relator, Eric Mauldin, purports to petition for writs of 

mandamus and prohibition. In substance, however, he seeks relief from at least one final felony 

conviction. Therefore, we construe his petition as a request for postconviction habeas relief.

A writ of habeas corpus is the exclusive means to challenge a final felony conviction. 

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07 § 3 (West Supp. 2014); Bd. of Pardons & Paroles ex 

rel. Keene v. Eighth Dist. Court of Appeals, 910 S.W.2d 481, 483 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). But 

only the court of criminal appeals has jurisdiction to grant postconviction habeas relief from a 

final felony conviction. See Keene, 910 S.W.2d at 483. Accordingly, we dismiss Relator’s 

postconviction petition for writ of habeas corpus for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion delivered March 18, 2015.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J., and Neeley, J.

(DO NOT PUBLISH)
COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF TEXAS

JUDGMENT

MARCH 18, 2015

NO. 12-15-00063-CR

ERIC MAULDIN,

Relator

V.

HON. JACK SKEEN, JR.,

Respondent

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

ON THIS DAY came to be heard the petition for writ of mandamus 

(construed as a petition for postconviction habeas relief) filed by ERIC MAULDIN; who is the 

relator in Cause No. 007-1313-04, pending on the docket of the 241st Judicial District Court of 

Smith County, Texas. Said petition having been filed herein on March 12, 2015, and the same 

having been duly considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that this Court does not have 

jurisdiction, it is therefore CONSIDERED, ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the said petition 

be, and the same is, hereby dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

By per curiam opinion.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Hoyle, J. and Neeley, J.
#### Luhman and another, Copartners, Appellants, v. Evergreen Cemetery Association, Respondent.

*October 6*

November *5, 1958.*

*214For the appellants there was a brief by *Clifford & Fitzpatrick,*attorneys, and *William B. Clifford*and *James A. Fitzpatrick*of counsel, all of Watertown, and oral argument by *James A. Fitzpatrick.*

For the respondent the cause was submitted on the brief of *Smith, Rogers & Smith*of Fort Atkinson.

Beoadfoot, J.

Neither party could cite any controlling Wisconsin case dealing with the subject involved in this controversy. Several cases from other jurisdictions were cited to the trial court and to us, but upon a review of those cases we find none particularly applicable to this situation.

*215It is clear that cemetery associations have the right to make rules, but there are certain restrictions upon this right: First, the rules must be reasonable; second, they must be made in good faith; and third, must apply to all persons uniformly.

Whether a rule is reasonable or unreasonable depends upon all of the facts and circumstances in each case. The complaint, liberally construed, raises an issue that the rule complained of is unreasonable under the particular allegations set forth therein. The complaint further challenges the rule on the ground that it was not made in good faith in that it was made to stifle competition and to give the defendant a monopoly on the burial-vault business within its cemetery. The allegations of the complaint further establish that the rule is not to be uniformly applied in that the charge is not assessed to the manufacturer of vaults sold by the defendant.

The record, so far, does not establish whether the defendant was incorporated under the provisions of ch. 157, Stats., or whether it was incorporated as a private corporation organized for profit. Probably it would make no difference. Even if the defendant was organized for profit, the public has an interest in the burial of the dead. The right of lot owners to select a particular type of burial vault was also raised by the complaint.

The trial court assumed, although it has not been established by proof, that the transportation of vaults manufactured by the plaintiffs over the cemetery roads, pathways, and sodded areas would naturally involve a certain amount of wear and tear upon the premises. The same may be assumed as to the vaults sold by the cemetery association. Certainly there is nothing in the record so far to indicate that more wear and tear would result thereto because used by the plaintiffs or their agents than would result if the same transportation was done by the defendant. The complaint recites *216that the charge authorized is for the assistance of cemetery employees. It does not appear in the record that it is compensation for wear and tear.

We conclude that the issues presented by the complaint can be properly resolved only by means of a trial. The demurrer therefore should have been overruled.

*By the Court.*— Order reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings.

MaRtin, C. J., and Brown, J., took no part.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 PIONEER COMPANIES, INC.
2.75% CONVERTIBLE SENIOR SUBORDINATED NOTES DUE 2027
CUSIP NUMBERS: 723643 AA0, 723643 AC6
 NOTICE OF CONVERTIBILITY
   th
   Signature page follows
 PIONEER COMPANIES, INC.By:
    /s/ George H. PainName:
    George H. PainTitle:
    Vice President and Secretary