alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State ex rel. Milwaukee County, Appellant, v. Schmidt, Director of State Department of Public Welfare and another, Respondents.

*May 7*

June *26, 1959.*

*548For the appellant there was a brief by *C. Stanley Perry,*corporation counsel, and *George E. Rice,*assistant corporation counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Rice.*

For the respondents there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *James H. McDermott,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mr. McDermott.*

Dieterich, J.

In the case before us the petitioner for the alternative writ of mandamus is Milwaukee county. The issues involve the interpretation of statutes controlling the distribution among counties of a tax burden in a very substantial amount, and further an order to permanently restrain the said Wilbur J. Schmidt, as Director of the State Department of Public Welfare of the state of Wisconsin, from collecting from relatives, patients and their estates and guardianships, in violation of sec. 46.10 (2), Stats.

The statutes involved are secs. 46.10 (2), 46.106 (1), and 51.08 (1). It is conceded by all parties that Milwaukee county may, pursuant to sec. 46.10 (2), collect for the maintenance of patients in Milwaukee county institutions from persons liable under the statute.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State ex rel. Racine County v. Schmidt,*ante, p. 528, 97 N. W. (2d) 493, and is ruled by the decision therein.

Petitioner’s contentions with respect to sec. 46.10 (2), Stats., are the same as those of the petitioning counties in the companion case. We think, however, that in view of the writ which will be issued in the companion case and the opinion expressed as to the law, it is unnecessary that any writ be issued in this action to restrain respondent Schmidt from using the “state-wide average” when collecting from private resources.

*549
      *By the Court.*— Judgment in so far as the alternative writ pertains to the duties of respondent Schmidt, Director of Public Welfare, under sec. 46.10 (2), Stats., is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with the opinion filed herein and opinion filed in *State ex rel. Racine County v. Schmidt, supra,*and in all other respects the judgment is affirmed.

Martin, C. J., took no part.
09-102attachment3.doc Page 1 of 1 

ATTACHMENT 3 

Preliminary Information to OFEGLI Regarding the Death of A 

Federal Employee

1. We are sending you the preliminary information on a death in service case for you to begin processing 

the survivor’s benefit. The survivor was provided the FE-6, Claim for Death Benefits, (and FE-6 DEP, 

Statement of Claim, if appropriate) with instructions to mail it directly to OFEGLI with the certified death 

certificate and copies of any other documents, as appropriate.

a. Employee’s Full Name: 

b. Employee's Date of Death: 

c. Employee's Social Security Number: 

d. Employee's Date of Birth: 

e. Survivor’s Full Name: 

f. Relationship of Survivor to Employee: 

g. Survivor's Social Security Number: 

 

 h. Survivor's Mailing Address: 

i. Is the survivor(s) currently living outside the continental United States?  yes  no 

j. Survivor's Home Phone Number: 

k. Agency Name: 

l. Agency Mailing Address: 

 

m. Name of Agency Point of Contact: 

n. Commercial Telephone Number of Agency Point of Contact: 

o. Fax Number of Agency Point of Contact: 

2. Attached are the following forms/documents: 

Benefits Specialist: Date:
#### American National Red Cross, Appellant, vs. Banks and others, Trustees, Respondents.

*October 6*

November *3, 1953.*

*68For the appellant there were briefs by *McPherson & McPherson*and Hughes, *Anderson &*Davis, all of Superior, and oral argument by *L. R. McPherson*and *John L. Davis.*

For the respondents there was a brief by Crawford, *Crawford & Cirilli*of Superior, and oral argument by *R. A. Crawford.*

Gehl, J.

The chapter contends that its transaction with the committee constitutes a bailment, and that the statute of limitations did not begin to run against its cause of action for the recovery of the fund and property turned over until demand for such return was made on July 14, 1950. The difficulty with that contention is that the transaction does not constitute a bailment. There is no allegation that it was intended by the parties- that ownership of the fund was to *69remain in the chapter. 6 Am. Jur., Bailments, p. 216, sec. 57. Nothing is alleged out of which we are able to read the right reserved to the chapter to demand return of the fund.

“The law is that in order to constitute a bailment there must be an agreement, express or implied, to redeliver the property bailed when the purpose of tlie bailment has been fulfilled.” *Bradley v. Harper,*173 Wis. 103, 108, 180 N. W. 130. See also *Ketler v. Klingbeil,*219 Wis. 213, 262 N. W. 612. There is no bailment.

It is not necessary to determine whether a trust was or was not created. In either case the plaintiff cannot prevail. If a trust relation was established, the resolution creating it contains no provision reserving to the plaintiff the power of revocation. The settlor of a trust cannot, except under circumstances not here existing, revoke it unless he has reserved such power. Restatement, 2 Trusts, pp. 984, 1138, secs. 330, 367; *Daughters of American Revolution v. Washburn College,*160 Kan. 583, 164 Pac. (2d) 128; *Strong v. Doty,*32 Wis. 381.

If, on the other hand, the plaintiff was without authority to transfer its property in trust, as it now contends, its remedy is in an action for money had and received. *Northwestern Union Packet Co. v. Shaw,*37 Wis. 655; *Clarke v. Lincoln Lumber Co.*59 Wis. 655, 18 N. W. 492. The statute of limitations, sec. 330.19 (3), Stats., which provides a six-year period of limitations in the case of implied contracts, applies. *Ketler v. Klingbeil, supra; Milwaukee v. Drew,*220 Wis. 511, 265 N. W. 683; 54 C. J. S., Limitation of Actions, p. 101, sec. 159. Approximately thirty years had elapsed since the transfer of the fund and prior to the demand for its return and the commencement of this action.

The trial court was correct in its conclusion that any claim which the plaintiff might have was barred by operation of the statute of limitations.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
Order entered October 28, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-00401-CV

LRF1 DALLAS LOGISTICS 1 LLC, Appellant

V.

CITY OF CARROLLTON AND BRETT KING, BUILDING OFFICIAL OF 

THE CITY, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-09123

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal which we abated after the parties informed the 

Court they had settled, but the appeal could not be dismissed until certain terms of 

the agreement were satisfied. According to the parties at the time we abated the 

appeal, those certain terms were to be satisfied by October 15, 2020. Although 

more than ten days have passed since the terms were to be satisfied, the parties 

have not communicated with the Court. 
Appellant’s brief was due to be filed when we abated the appeal. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file either its brief or a motion to dismiss 

the appeal no later than November 30, 2020.

/s/ ERIN A. NOWELL 

JUSTICE
**IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MON**  **TANA** Supreme Court Case No. DA 21 - 0514 JIM L. TOWSLEY AND B ETTY SMITH TOWSLEY ,

Plaintiffs and Appellees, vs. DAVID P. STANZAK, MARGO L . STANZAK, CRAI G FITCH, CARYN MISKE, LAURENCE B. M ILLER, JR., STEPHEN M. ZANDI, KARIN M. ZANDI, and all persons, known or unknown, claiming or who might claim any right, title, interest in or lien or encumbrance upon the personal p roperty described in the Complaint below which is adverse to the Plaintiff's ownership or a cloud upon Plaintiff's title thereto, whether such a claim or possible claim may be present or contingent,

Defendants and Appellees. **ODER GRANTING EXTENSION OF T IME**  On Appeal from the Montana Fourth Judicial District Court, Missoula County, Cause No. DV - 20 - 18, the Honorable Jason Marks presiding. The Appellee s’ mo tion under Montana Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(1) is granted. Appellee s’ response brief shall be due April 27, 2022.

____________________________

Electronically signed by: Bowen Greenwood Clerk of the Supreme Court March 14 2022

03/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0514
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23891]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: October 22, 2024; 1:00 p.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be held at the Surface Transportation Board at 
the address below and also streamed live on the Federal Maritime 
Commission's YouTube channel.

Surface Transportation Board, 395 E Street SW, Room #1042 (Hearing 
Room), Washington, DC 20423

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public. The meeting will be held on 
October 22, 2024, beginning at 1:00 p.m. in the Hearing Room of the 
Surface Transportation Board and the public portion of the meeting will 
be streamed live on the Federal Maritime Commission's YouTube channel. 
Any person wishing to attend the public portion of the meeting in-
person should report to Surface Transportation Board with enough time 
to clear building security procedures. If technical issues prevent the 
Commission from streaming live, the Commission will post a recording of 
the public portion of the meeting on the Commission's YouTube channel 
following the meeting.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC: 
1. Update on Enforcement
2. Update on Status of Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 2022--Charge 
Complaints
3. Update on Federal Maritime Commission Information Technology

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC: 
1. Internal Portion--Update on Enforcement
2. Internal Portion--Update on Status of Ocean Shipping Reform Act of 
2022--Charge Complaints
3. Internal Portion--Update on Federal Maritime Commission Information 
Technology

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: David Eng, Secretary, (202) 523-
5725.

David Eng,
Secretary, Federal Maritime Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-23891 Filed 10-10-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Karen Aalders, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Insight Management Corporation on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Insight Management Corporation





|             |                                      
|------------ | -------------------------------------
|By:          | /s/ Karen Aalders                    
|Name:
Title: | Karen Aalders
Chief Financial Officer
|May 15, 2009
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22

- 7412

GEORGE ALLEN WARD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. APRIL EDWARDS, Deputy (MS); MARK L. BARRICK, Sheriff, Mathews County Sheriff Department; MATHEWS COUNTY, VIRGINIA; LIEUTENANT WILLIAM “ BILL ” RILEY, Former; DEPUTY GILBERT COONS; MIKE ROWE, The County of Mathews Virginia Board of Supervisors Chairman; AMY D UBOIS, Member; MELISSA MASON, Member; PAUL HUDGINS, Member; JACKIE INGRAM, Member , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk

. Raymond A. Jackson, Senior District Judge. ( 2:19

- cv - 00526

- RAJ

- RJK )

Submitted : March 16, 2023 Decided: March 21, 2023

Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
George Allen Ward , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 22-7412 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: George Allen Ward seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court entered its order on October 18, 2022. In civil cases, pa rties have 30 days after t he entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he ti mely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell , 551 U.S. 2 0 5, 2 1 4 ( 2007 ). Because Ward is incarcerated, the notice of appeal is considered filed as of the date it was properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1);
Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266 , 267 (1988). The record does not conclusively establish that Ward provided his notice of ap peal to prison officials for mailing on or before
November 17, 2022. Accordingly, we remand the case for the limited purpose of allowing the district court to determine whether Ward timely noted an appeal under Rule 4(c)(1) and
Houston . The record, as su pplemented, will then be returned to this court for further
consideration.
REMANDED USCA4 Appeal: 22-7412 Doc: 11 Filed: 03/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Patheon Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Eric W. Evans, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,
to the knowledge of the undersigned, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |                                                      
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 10, 2011 |  | /s/ Eric W. Evans                                    
|                    |  | Eric W. Evans                                        
|                    |  | Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Report, irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be
retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #20729; IDAHO Disaster Number ID-20011 Declaration of Economic Injury]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Notice.
 SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) declaration for the State of Idaho dated October 7, 2024.
 DATES: Issued on October 7, 2024. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         July 7, 2025.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for disaster loans may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. *Incident:*
                     Wildfires, including the Bench Lake and Wapiti Fires. *Incident Period:*
                     July 11, 2024 and continuing. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Custer. *Contiguous Counties:* Idaho: Blaine, Boise, Butte, Elmore, Lemhi, Valley The Interest Rates are: PercentBusiness and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
3.250
 The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 207290. The State which received an EIDL Declaration is IDAHO. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2024-23682 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, November 08, 2016. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, November 08, 2016 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0130. KENNETH A. PEAKE v. PROGRESSIVE PREMIER INSURANCE COMPANY OF ILLINOIS. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 16C04631 16C00305
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Stephen V, Williams, Chief Executive Officer of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: August 13, 2010





By: /s/ Stephen V. Williams


-------------------------------------


Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)
### NUMBER 13

- 1 7

- 00 229

- C V



### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

ADAM S GARDEN IRRIGATION

DISTRICT #19, ET AL

, Appellant s

,

v.

TEXAS COMMISSION ON

ENVIRONMENTA L QUALITY, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 201st District Court

of Travis County, Texas.



### ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras

, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

This cause is before the Court on the parties’ joint motion to abate the appeal to

allow the parties the opportunity to engage in settlement negotiations.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the d ocuments on file and the2 joint motion to abate, is of the opinion that the joint motion to abate the appeal pending

settlement should be granted. The joint motion to abate the appeal pending settlement

is GRANTED and this appeal is ordered ABATED until Ju ly 16, 2018

.

The Court directs appellants to file, on or before July 16, 2018 , either (1) a motion

to reinstate the appeal, or (2) a motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED

.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed th e 17th day of April, 2018.
# L_2011205DE.01004401.xml

| 10.8.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 205/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 205/44

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 572/2011 des Rates vom 16. Juni 2011 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 204/2011 über restriktive Maßnahmen angesichts der Lage in Libyen

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 159 vom 17. Juni 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 159 vom 17. Juni 2011

Seite 2, Artikel 1 Nummer 2 neuer Artikel 10a erster Satz:

anstatt:

„ ‚Artikel 10a

Abweichend von Artikel 5 Absatz 2 können die auf den Websites in Anhang IV angegebenen zuständigen Behörden in den Mitgliedstaaten die Bereitstellung von bestimmten Geldern oder wirtschaftlichen Ressourcen für die in Anhang III aufgeführten Hafenbehörden genehmigen, damit vor dem 7. Juni 2011 geschlossene Verträge — ausgenommen Erdöl, Erdgas oder Raffinationsprodukte betreffende Verträge — bis zum 15. Juli 2011 erfüllt werden können.‘ “

muss es heißen:

„ ‚Artikel 10a

Abweichend von Artikel 5 Absatz 2 können die auf den Websites in Anhang IV angegebenen zuständigen Behörden in den Mitgliedstaaten die Bereitstellung von bestimmten Geldern oder wirtschaftlichen Ressourcen für die in Anhang III aufgeführten Hafenbehörden genehmigen, die im Zusammenhang mit der Erfüllung von vor dem 7. Juni 2011 geschlossenen Verträgen bis zum 15. Juli 2011 steht, ausgenommen Erdöl, Erdgas oder Raffinationsprodukte betreffende Verträge.‘ “

---
Exhibit 32.1

Written Statement of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Homeowners Choice, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 14, 2010 (the
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



/s/ FRANCIS X. MCCAHILL IIIFrancis X. McCahill IIIPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 14, 2010


A signed original of this document
has been provided to Homeowners Choice, Inc. and will be retained by Homeowners Choice, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.