alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6377
CHRISTOPHER ARENDS RUSSELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus BENNIE BRIGMAN, Superintendent, Bladen County North Carolina Correctional Unit, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-416-V) Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997 Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Murrel Cooper, COOPER, DAVIS & COOPER, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997.) We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate ofprobable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Russell v. Brigman , No. CA-93-416-V (W.D.N.C. Feb. 8, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CLAYTON WILLIAMS ENERGY, INC. 

and CHESAPEAKE EXPORATION, 

L.L.C.,

 Appellants,

v.

BMT O & G TX, L.P., GOLIAD O & G 

TX, L.P., WD O & G TX, L.P., 

KEYSTONE O & G TX, L.P., and THRU 

LINE O & G TX, L.P.,

 Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

§

No. 08-14-00133-CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 12-02-20072-CVR)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore vacate the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding title and 

injunctive relief to non-litigant CTV O & G TX, L.P.

We further reverse the remainder of the trial court’s judgment and render judgment that 

the Appellees take nothing against the Appellants, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We 

further order this decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

To the Board of Directors of Bank of America, National Association: 

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Assessment Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria (the "Compliance Statement"), that Bank of America, National Association (the "Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for the asset-backed securities transactions involving commercial mortgage loan transactions that involved an offer or sale of asset-backed securities  that were required to be registered on or after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Platform"), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year then ended, excluding the criteria which the Company has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performed by them with respect to the Platform, as indicated in Appendix A of the Compliance Statement. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination. 

 Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected asset backed securities transactions that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management's assertion that Bank of America, National Association complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

February 22, 2013 

**
#### State ex rel. Kojis, Respondent, vs. Barczak, Sheriff, Appellant.

*April 15*

May *5, 1953.*

For the appellant there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *William J. McCauley,*district attorney of Milwaukee county, and *Ben J. Wiener,*special assistant district attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Wiener.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Cornelius P. Hanley*of Milwaukee, attorney, and *Terence N. Hickey*of Hayward of counsel, and oral argument by *Mr. Hanley.*

Fairchild, J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State ex rel. Kojis v. Barczak,*ante, p. 136, 58 N. W. (2d) 420, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— Order reversed and cause remanded with direction to quash the writ and for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
July 30, 2015

ID: FAA-2015-1296-0001

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Exemption Request Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act of 2012

Dear Sir or Madam:

The specific reasons we seek relief is to operate in the following areas of commerce:

1. Closed Set Filming

 Our MPTOM is outlined in the documents we provided in our original exemption 

request. Please refer to the two published documents labeled:

A. SkyNet Aerial Media LLC.– UAV Flight Operations Manual

B. SkyNet Aerial Media LLC.– Preflight Checklist

2. Geographical Mapping

3. Agricultural Mapping and Analysis

4. Real Estate Photography and Video

5. General Aerial Photography and Video

In addition, we are providing to you all of the Release forms we currently use in out film 

and photography operations. 

We hope this information helps to define our intentions in regulated airspace. If more 

information is needed, we are always available to provide to your office any and all 

requested documentation. Thank you for you time and consideration.

Sincerely,

Brett Strnad

SkyNet Aerial Media LLC.

105 Banyan Cir.
Jupiter Fl, 33458
Exhibit 34.6



LOGO

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of CoreLogic, Inc.:

We have examined managements assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance, that CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate
Services, Inc. (the Company), an indirect subsidiary of CoreLogic, Inc. complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for all loans for commercial
mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company served as the commercial tax service provider (the Platform), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year then ended, only including 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(v),
1122(d)(2)(vi), 1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), 1122(d)(4)(xii) and 1122(d)(4)(xiii), which the Company has determined are applicable to the servicing activities performed by it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the
Companys compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence
about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing

of selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company performed those selected activities in compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may
have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion,
managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 for all loans for commercial mortgage loan outsourcing customers for which the Company
served as the commercial tax service provider is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

February 6, 2013

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 1800, Dallas, Texas 75201

T: (214) 999-1400, F: (214) 754-7991, www.pwc.com/us
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED): November 1, 2007
 
 NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation or organization)
    
    001-31465
(Commission File
Number)
    
    35-2164875
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)601 Jefferson, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive 
offices)
    
    
    
    77002
(Zip code)
 713) 751-7507
   ̈
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
  ̈
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
  ̈
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
  ̈
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under
the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (c)
    
    Exhibits
 99.1
    
    Natural Resource Partners L.P. press release dated as of November 1, 2007.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.(Registrant)By:
    
    NRP (GP) LPits General PartnerBy:
    
    GP Natural Resource Partners LLCits General Partner/s/ Wyatt L. HoganWyatt L. HoganVice President and General Counsel




---



##### 



99.1
    
    Natural Resource Partners L.P. press release dated as of November 1, 2007.
# L_2012077DE.01002302.xml

| 16.3.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 77/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 77/23

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 786/2011 der Kommission vom 5. August 2011 zur Genehmigung des Wirkstoffs 1-Naphthylacetamid gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1107/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über das Inverkehrbringen von Pflanzenschutzmitteln sowie zur Änderung des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 540/2011 der Kommission und der Entscheidung 2008/941/EG der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 203 vom 6. August 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 203 vom 6. August 2011

Auf Seite 13, Artikel 2 Absatz 2 Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

„... durch die der oder die betreffende(n) Wirkstoff(e) in Anhang I der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG aufgenommen wurde(n); maßgebend ist das späteste Datum.“

muss es heißen:

„... durch die der oder die betreffende(n) Wirkstoff(e) in Anhang I der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG aufgenommen bzw. genehmigt wurde(n); maßgebend ist das späteste Datum.“

---
EX-10.6(c)



 EXHIBIT 10.6(c) 

August 8, 2014 
 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC 

522 Fifth Avenue, 13th Floor 
 New York, New York 10036 

 

	Re:	Ceres Managed Futures LLC: Amended Schedules 1 and 2 to the Alternative Investment Selling Agent Agreement 


Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Pursuant to paragraph
13(c) of the Alternative Investment Selling Agent Agreement dated November 12, 2013, as amended on March 1, 2014; April 7, 2014 and as further amended from time to time (the “Agreement”), between, among others, Ceres
Managed Futures LLC (“CMF”), the general partner of each of the limited partnerships listed on Schedule 1 thereto (each, a “Partnership,” and together, the “Partnerships”), and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
(“MSSB”), CMF is hereby confirming that Schedules 1 and 2 to the Agreement are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with Schedules 1 and 2 attached hereto effective as of October 1, 2014. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, by signing below MSSB hereby agrees to, acknowledges and accepts the amendment of
the Agreement, effective as of October 1, 2014. 







 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our discussions, kindly sign and
return to us a counterpart hereof (by mail, facsimile or email) as soon as possible. 
  

					
	 Sincerely, 

		
		 	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alper Daglioglu

		 		 	Alper Daglioglu
		 		 	President and Director
		
		 	EACH PARTNERSHIP LISTED ON SCHEDULE 1 HERETO
		
		 	By: Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the general partner of each Partnership
			
		 	By:	 	 /s/ Alper Daglioglu

		 		 	Alper Daglioglu
		 		 	President and Director


 Confirmed, accepted and agreed to: 
  

			
	MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jeremy Beal

	Name:	 	Jeremy Beal
	Title:	 	Executive Director


  
 Page 2 








 SCHEDULE 1 
  

					
	 PARTNERSHIP
	  	 STATE AND DATE OF

ORGANIZATION
	  	 EFFECTIVE DATE

	 Westport Futures Fund L.P.
	  	New York; March 21, 1997	  	October 1, 2013


  
 Page 3 








 SCHEDULE 2 
  

			
	 PARTNERSHIP
	  	 ONGOING SELLING AGENT FEE

	Westport Futures Fund L.P.	  	2.00% per year of the adjusted net assets of the Partnership (computed monthly by multiplying the adjusted net assets of the Partnership by 2.00% and dividing the result thereof by 12)1

  

	1 	Adjusted net assets are month-end Net Assets increased by the current month’s management fee, ongoing selling agent fee, incentive fee accrual and other expenses and any redemptions or distributions as of the end
of such month. 


  
 Page 4
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

JOHNNY POURCIAU

VERSUS

EARL DEMPSEY PENDARVIS

NO. 2022 CW 0422

JULY 5, 2022

In Re: Johnny Pourciau, applying for supervisory writs, 23rd

Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 

132732. 

BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

Pmc

JEW

CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SaveDaily, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff Mahony, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/JEFF MAHONY          | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|Jeff Mahony             | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|August 14, 2012         | 



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying
the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 6, 2007
 SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction)
    
    0-20310
(Commission File Number)
    
    75-2379388
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 1105 Peters Road, Harvey, Louisiana
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    70058
(Zip Code)
 (504) 362-4321
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
 Approval of 2008 Long-Term Incentive Awards
      Performance
    
    
    Non-Qualified
    
    
    Shares ofRecipient
    
    Share Units
    
    
    Stock Options
    
    
    Restricted StockTerence E. Hall
    
    
    15,200.0
    
    
    
    52,999
    
    
    
    21,205Kenneth L. Blanchard
    
    
    6,462.5
    
    
    
    22,533
    
    
    
    9,016Robert S. Taylor
    
    
    4,562.5
    
    
    
    15,908
    
    
    
    6,365A. Patrick Bernard
    
    
    3,937.5
    
    
    
    13,729
    
    
    
    5,493Danny R. Young
    
    
    2,625.0
    
    
    
    9,153
    
    
    
    3,662




---



##### 



Approval of Base Salary Increases
  Recipient
    
    Title
    
    
    SalaryTerence E. Hall
    
    Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
    
    $
    760,000Kenneth L. Blanchard
    
    Chief Operating Officer, President
    
    $
    470,000Robert S. Taylor
    
    Chief Financial Officer, Executive
    
    $
    365,000Vice President, TreasurerAlan P. Bernard
    
    Senior
Executive Vice President
    
    $
    350,000Danny R. Young
    
    Executive Vice President
    
    $
    300,000
 Approval of 2008 Annual Incentive Compensation Targets
    Position
    
    Minimum
    
    Target
    
    MaximumCEO
    
    
    45
    %
    
    
    90
    %
    
    
    180
    %COO
    
    
    37.5
    %
    
    
    75
    %
    
    
    150
    %CFO
    
    
    32.5
    %
    
    
    65
    %
    
    
    130
    %Sr. EVPs
    
    
    30
    %
    
    
    60
    %
    
    
    120
    %EVPs
    
    
    27.5
    %
    
    
    55
    %
    
    
    110
    %




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.By:

/s/
Robert S. TaylorRobert S. TaylorDated:  December 12, 2007
    
    Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of 4th Grade Films, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), we, James Doolin, President and Director, and Shane Thueson, Vice President and Director, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.








Date:
05/11/11

By:
/s/James DoolinJames DoolinPrincipal Financial Officer,President & DirectorDate:
05/11/11

By:
/s/Shane ThuesonShane ThuesonPrincipal Executive Officer,Vice President & Director