alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust
2012-C3

The undersigned, duly authorized officers of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of September 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among, UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special
Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge
Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects during the reporting period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ Ronaldo Reyes

BY: Ronaldo Reyes

Title: Vice President

Date: March 1, 2019



/s/ Karlene Collins

BY: Karlene Collins

Title: Assistant Vice President

Date: March 1, 2019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

STEVEN FRIEDMAN, MD, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF GAIL FRIEDMAN, DECEASED,

Petitioner

v.

DEVON MANOR AND HEARTLAND PHARMACY OF PA LLC, AND HCR MANOR CARE, INC.,

Respondents :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 494 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
----

|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and results of the Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| December 19, 2014 | By:    | /s/ Shawn Phillips                          |   |
|-------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|
|              |   | Shawn Phillips, Principal Executive Officer |   |
|              |   |                                        |   |
|              |   |                                        |   |
|              | By:    | /s/ Erin Phillips                           |   |
|              |   | Erin Phillips, Principal Financial Officer  |   |

----
#### PITTSBURG FINANCE CO. v. NEWSOME.

No. 3597.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Oct. 28, 1937.

W. Clyde Hull, of Pittsburg, for plaintiff in error.

J. A. Guest, of Pittsburg, for defendant in error.

NEALON, Chief Justice.

The Pittsburg Finance Company, plaintiff in error, hereinafter ' styled plaintiff, sued John D. Newsome, hereinafter styled defendant, upon a promissory note for $220, dated January 3, 1931, due October 1, 1931, providing for attorney’s fees and interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum. Defendant filed general demurrer, general denial, and the plea that the cause of action was barred by the four-year statute of limitation “prior to the filing of this suit.” The suit was filed September 30, 1935 — one day before the end of the four-year period.

The case was tried to the court, which entered judgment dismissing the same, reciting, after hearing the pleading and the argument: “It is considered by the Court that the plaintiff, Pittsburg Finance Company, ought not to recover of said defendant John D. Newsome, but that said defendant ought to go hence without day,” to which judgment plaintiff duly excepted and gave notice of appeal. Thereafter plaintiff filed timely his request for findings of fact and conclusions of law. The county judge did not comply with this request. October 3, 1936, plaintiff again filed a written request for findings of fact stated separately from conclusions of law, and for the second time the county judge failed to comply with the request, to which refusals or failures plaintiff duly excepted.

Plaintiff also presented to opposing counsel and to the county judge a statement of facts, and called the attention of defendant’s counsel and of said judge to the same. He was unable to obtain an agreement from counsel for defendant, and after duly certifying said statement of facts, filed it in the clerk’s office and requested the court to file a statement of facts. The court approved the bill of exception with respect to the statement of facts, with this qualification: “As Judge of the County Court of Camp County, it is denied by me that statement of facts and conclusions of law was, or has at any time been refused. Statement of facts was prepared by me immediately after adjournment of my February term of Court, but attorney for plaintiff failed to appeal during the time for which nature was given for same.”

No statement of facts was ever filed.

Opinion.

It was the duty of the county judge under the circumstances to prepare a .statement of facts and file same. It was not sufficient that he prepare one which he was willing to deliver to counsel *574for plaintiff. It was plaintiff’s right that the statement of facts be filed. R.C.S. art. 2240. The court erred in failing to perform said duty.

Likewise the plaintiff, upon request, was entitled to have the judge state in writing the conclusions of fact found by him separately from the conclusions of law, and the court erred in failing and refusing to comply with said request. Article 2208, R.C.S.

On account of the errors pointed out, judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Dwight
L. Merriman III, certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Industrial Property Trust Inc.; and
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|               |  |  |  |                              
|-------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------
|April 15, 2015 |  |  |  | /s/    DWIGHT L. MERRIMAN
III
|               |  |  |  | Dwight L. Merriman III       
|               |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer      
|               |  |  |  | (Principal Executive Officer)
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

 

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 13-303 Date: August 2013 

Subject: September 2013 Headcount

This is a reminder for payroll providers to submit the semiannual Headcount for the September 2013

reporting period no later than September 20, 2013. 

The September 2013 Headcount for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles will be for the payroll paid during 

the FIRST 15 DAYS of September. For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period will be August 1 

through August 31, 2013. All Headcount reports must be submitted no later than September 20, 2013. 

We ask that you notify us if you anticipate a delay or any difficulties in submitting the report by that date. 

Under no circumstances, however, should you delay transmitting your normal Retirement and Insurance 

Transfer System (RITS) report because your Headcount is not ready to be submitted. 

Please FAX (using CLEAR, legible originals) your OPM Form 1523 and SF 2812-A to 202-606-0701; 

or you may e-mail your forms to Yadira.Vega@opm.gov or Paul.Gvozdov@opm.gov. In addition, please 

mail the original forms to: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Funds Management, P.O. Box 7125, 

Washington DC 20415. If you have any questions concerning the preparation of your Headcount report, 

please call Ms. Vega at 202-606-4842. 

 

 

Kim Farington 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
Exhibit 23.A**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use of our report dated February 26, 2007 in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-4) and Prospectus of El Paso Natural Gas Company for the registration of $355,000,000 in principal amount of 5.95%Senior Notes due 2017./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPHouston, Texas
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139644-5 

DR. KUO-CHUN CHEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139644 

 COA: 283420 

Wayne CC: 97-728411-CZ 

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

DR. KUO-CHUN CHEN, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 139645 

 COA: 283575 

Wayne CC: 97-016809-CM 

WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, DR. JACK 

LILIEN, DR. STANLEY GANGWERE, and 

DR. P. DENNIS SMITH, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
| (logo)  WELLS FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, by and amongMorgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Master Servicer, Custodian, Certificate Administrator,Certifiate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, Midland Loan Services, adivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, SitusHoldings, LLC, as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank, National Association as Trustee,with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-C6(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwisedefined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 of the Agreement,I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services do herebycertify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       To thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilledall of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo)  Together we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
#### SNEED v. STATE.

No. 20186.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

Earl M. Greer, of Wills Point, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The offense is a violation of the liquor laws of this State, the punishment assessed being a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. The proceedings appear to be regular, and we find no complaint thereof in the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT AR TUR O GUX GOUXLA, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde n t . No. 11-72537 Age n c y No. A095-757-431 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d

M ay 14, 2013 ** B e fore : LEAVY, THOM AS, and M UR GUIA, C irc uit Judge s . Arturo Gux Gouxla , a

native and c i tiz e n of Gua te m a la , pe titions pro se

for re vie w of the B oa

rd of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r dism issing his a ppe a l from an im m igration judge ’ s (“ IJ” ) de c ision de ny ing his a pplic at ion for a sy lum , withholding of rem o v a l, a nd re lie f unde r the C onve ntion Aga inst Torture(“ C AT” ).



# FIL ED MAY17 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without ora l a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).Our jurisdic tion is governe d by 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide nc e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, W ak k ary v . Holde r , 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th C ir. 2009), a

n d we dism iss in pa

rt a nd de ny in pa rt the pe tition for re vie w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the IJ’ s de n ia l of Gouxla ’ s a sy l um and C AT c la im s. Se e Barron v . Ashc roft , 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th C ir. 2004) (no jurisdiction ove r le ga l c la im s not pre se nte d to theB IA). Gouxla fe ars ha rm by individuals with whom

he ha d a la n d disputebe twe e n 1988 a nd 1990. Substa

ntia l e vide nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s de nia l of withholding of re m ova l be c a

u s e Gouxla

fa ile d to e sta

blish theGuat e m a la

n gove rnm e nt wa s una ble or unwilling to c ontrol the se individuals. Se e Rahimzade h v . Holde r , 613 F.3d 916, 920 (9th C ir. 2010). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D in par t; DE NIE D in par t.

1 1 - 7 2 5 3 7 2
# L_2011038EN.01002101.xml

| 12.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 38/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 38/21

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 124/2011

of 11 February 2011

fixing the amount of private storage aid for certain fishery products in the 2011 fishing year

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 2813/2000 of 21 December 2000 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 as regards the grant of private storage aid for certain fishery products (2), and in particular Article 1 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Private storage aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Union during the fishing year preceding the year in question. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Private storage aid should not exceed the sum of technical and financial costs recorded in the Union during the fishing year preceding the year in question.

| (2) | To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

To discourage long-term storage, to shorten payment times and to reduce the burden of controls, private storage aid should be paid in one single instalment.

| (3) | In order not to hinder the operation of the intervention system in the year 2011, this Regulation should apply retroactively from 1 January 2011. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In order not to hinder the operation of the intervention system in the year 2011, this Regulation should apply retroactively from 1 January 2011.

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the Management Committee for Fishery Products,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

For the 2011 fishing year the amount of private storage aid, referred to in Article 25 of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, for the products listed in Annex II to that Regulation shall be as follows:

| — | first month | : | EUR 219 per tonne, |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| — | second month | : | EUR 0 per tonne. |

—

first month

:

EUR 219 per tonne,

—

second month

:

EUR 0 per tonne.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 January 2011.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 February 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 326, 22.12.2000, p. 30.

2

---
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage Servicing**D1086-120, 12th Floor550 South Tyron StreetCharlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 **ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**  Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, by and among RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C9 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement. Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that: 1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and 2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.  /s/ Daniel BoberDaniel BoberExecutive Vice President Wells Fargo Bank    
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|-----------------------|------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 35.3












ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

COMM 2012-CCRE3

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
dated as of October 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among, Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as
Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National
Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate
Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, here by certifies in accordance with
Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects during the reporting period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator





BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-2189

VINCENT ONWUBUARIRI, 

 Petitioner, 

 v. 

ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, 

 Respondent. 

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals.

Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 20, 2009 

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Vincent Onwubuariri, Petitioner Pro Se. Paul Thomas 

Cygnarowicz, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

 Vincent Onwubuariri, a native and citizen of Nigeria, 

petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration 

Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reconsider. Because 

Onwubuariri has failed to challenge the Board’s denial of 

reconsideration in his informal brief, we find that he has 

waived appellate review. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (limiting review 

to issues raised in the informal brief on appeal); Edwards v. 

City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir. 1999) 

(finding that a party’s failure to raise an issue in the opening 

brief constituted abandonment of that issue). We therefore deny 

the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. 

See In re: Onwubuariri (B.I.A. Sept. 23, 2008).* We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before the court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED

 *

 Even if Onwubuariri had not waived appellate review, we 

note that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying the 

motion on the ground that he failed to identify any error of 

fact or law in the prior Board decision. See 8 C.F.R. 

§ 1003.2(b)(1) (2008).