alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Point.360 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of
      the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.







/s/
      Alan
      R. Steel


Alan
      R.
      Steel


Chief
      Financial Officer


November
      13, 2008
#### HINES v. STATE.

No. 15292.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1932.

J. T. Ranspot, of Mineral Wells, for appel-. lant.

Lloyd. W. .Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*824CHRISTIAN, X

The offense is aggravated assault; the punishment, a dne of $25.

No bills of exception are brought forward. The statement of facts is in question and answer form. It has long been the settled rule of this court under the statutes and the decisions not to consider a statement of facts tiled in this court which is in question and answer form, but such statement when filed here must be in narrative form. Knox v. State, 113 Tex. Cr. R. 373, 22 S.W.(2d) 932.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 10.1


 


 





Promissory Note


 





	USD $150,000.00	 	Due: ON DEMAND



 


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned hereby acknowledges
itself indebted to Crystal Falls Llc(the “Lender”) and promises to pay to or to the order of the Lender at New York,
New York or as otherwise directed in writing by the Lender, the principal sum of $150,000.00 in lawful money of the United
States of America with no interest thereon.


 


The entire principal sum shall be paid on demand.


 


The Borrower may pay the principal sum at any time without penalty.


 


The Lender may assign all of its right, title and interest
in, to and under this promissory note. All payments required to be made hereunder shall be made by the Borrower without any right
of setoff or counterclaim.


 


DATED: June 13, 2014


 


 


EUROCAN HOLDINGS LTD.


 


 


 


Per: /s/ Michael Williams                


Michael Williams


President
[No. 46011-1-I.

Division One.

November 13, 2000.]

#### Donald R. Woods, *Appellant,*v. The Employment Security Department, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-2-09453-1, Richard M. Ishikawa, J., entered January 6, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40339

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

GERARDO OMAR FRANCO-DE LA CRUZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:16-CR-418-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Gerardo Omar Franco-De La Cruz appeals the 58-month sentence 

imposed on his guilty plea conviction of possession with intent to distribute 

marijuana. Because Franco-De La Cruz did not alert the district court to the 

specific issues he now raises on appeal, we review for plain error. See United 

States v. Neal, 578 F.3d 270, 272 (5th Cir. 2009).

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 14, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40339 Document: 00514387095 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/14/2018
No. 17-40339

2

First, Franco-De La Cruz argues that the district court improperly 

limited the extent of his downward departure by considering improper factors. 

See United States v. Desselle, 450 F.3d 179, 182 (5th Cir. 2006). If we assume 

without deciding that the district court’s comments at sentencing reflect a clear 

or obvious error, we nonetheless conclude that Franco-De La Cruz has not 

shown that the error affected his substantial rights. See United States v. 

Escalante-Reyes, 689 F.3d 415, 424 (5th Cir. 2012) (en banc); United States v. 

Malone, 828 F.3d 331, 341 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 137 S. Ct. 526 (2016) (finding 

harmless error where the district court merely “muddled the steps” in 

formulating the sentence).

Second, Franco-De La Cruz disagrees with how the district court 

balanced the pertinent § 3553(a) sentencing factors. We perceive no reversible 

error. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); Malone, 828 F.3d at 

342 & n.41.

AFFIRMED.

 Case: 17-40339 Document: 00514387095 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/14/2018
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                |   |   |   |                    |
|---------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date: July 14, 2014 |   |   |   | /s/ Michael Altman      |
|                |   |   |   | Michael Altman          |
|                |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

----

----
# L_2011049EN.01005301.xml

| 24.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 49/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 49/53

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 144/2011 of 17 February 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 206/2010 laying down lists of third countries, territories or parts thereof authorised for the introduction into the European Union of certain animals and fresh meat and the veterinary certification requirements

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 44 of 18 February 2011
  )

On page 17, Annex, the table in point 2, row ‘BW — Botswana’, 8th column:

for:

‘[insert the date of application of present Regulation]’,

read:

‘
  18 February 2011
  ’.

---
Suitability and Credentialing Executive Agent Notice 

Notice No. 24-01 January 8, 2024 

Subject: Reminder to Agencies on Instructions for Frozen Credit 

This notice serves as a reminder that individuals undergoing background investigations do not 

need to lift security freezes on consumer or credit report files. With the passage of the 

Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act which was signed into law 

on May 24, 2018, security freezes do not apply to the making of a credit report for use in 

connection with “employment, tenant, or background screening purposes” (see Sec. 

301(a)(4)(I) of the Act). 

The instructions for the Standard Forms 86, 85P, and 85, Questionnaires for National Security 

Positions, Public Trust Positions, and Non-Sensitive positions, respectively, advise individuals 

that a security freeze on consumer or credit report files may prevent investigations from being 

completed, thus adversely affecting eligibility. Individuals completing the forms are asked to 

request the freeze be lifted for the purpose of the background investigation. However, with 

changes to the law from the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection 

Act, this is no longer the case. As such, on October 5, 2018, agencies were notified that 

beginning September 24, 2018, it was no longer necessary for agencies to instruct subjects of 

investigation to unfreeze their credit for background investigation purposes. See Federal 

Investigations Notice 19-01, Frozen Credit Instruction for Personnel Background 

Investigations. 

Until updates are made to the forms to remove this instruction, agencies should continue to 

follow the guidance from 2018 and to not instruct individuals to remove security freezes on 

consumer or credit report files. Agencies might also consider issuing a general reminder to 

their workforce about this change. 

Questions may be directed to SuitEA@opm.gov. 

 

 2024.01.08 

Lisa M. Loss 

Director 

Suitability Executive Agent Programs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KAIJIN XAVIER SCOTT,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 177 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of November, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

I REGION IX I 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105-3901 February 5, 2010 I

I In Reply AIR-3 Refer To: SE 98-01 Jon Boyer Environmental Manager High Desert Power Project, LLC 19000 Perimeter Road I Victorville, CA 92394 I Re: Prevention JfSignificantDeterioration PermitRevision for the High Desert Power Proje:ct (SE 98-01) I Dear Mr. Boyer:

I I This letter and the enclosed materials are in response to the information you provided to revise the Prevention ofsighificant Deterioration (PSD) dermit, issued t6 the High Desert Power Project, LLC for the constrJction and operation ofthe High Desert Powe'r Project (HDPP), a 720 megawattpower generatingIfacility located at 19000 Perirrteter Road, Victorville, California. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 (EPA) i1ssued the original PSD permit on February 15, 20C1. I · In accordance with grovisions ofthe Clean Air Ac1t, as amended (42 U.S.C. 7401 etseq.), we have reviewed the inforrhation HDPP has provided ana determined that the requested permit revisions do not

### significantl~ alter ourprior analyses and baybe

### proces~ed as a minor revision

, I I to the existing PSD permit. EPA is seeking public comments on ourproRosal to approve these permitrevisions.

. A public notice will pe published in the San Bernardino Sun, Victorville Daily Press, and EIMojave on Saturday, February 6,2010, to announce th6 proposed perrhit revisions and commence the public comrJent period. The EPA Region 19 website at http://www.epa.gov/ region09/air/permit/ r9-perJits-issued.html will also announce the publit comment period, and make available the proposed permit and supporting docutbents for publid review. The docket for this action will also be acceJsible at www.regulations.goJ, Docket 10 ERA-R09-0AR-20l0­ 0129. Comments on this proposed action may be submitted to the EPAIRegion 9 Office, Attn: Leslie Ramirez (AIR-3), until March 7, 2010. Should

### the~e be a significant amount ofpublic comment with respect to thd proposed action EPA may hJld a public

### he~ring. The final permit action will be effrive

## thirt~ (30) days afterthe date of

# it

uance unless: I . 1. A later effecJive date is specified in the final decision; 2. Review is

### re~uested under 40 CFR l24.l9[ or

Printed on RecycledPaper

I :
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82608]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23688]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 4:04 p.m. on Tuesday, October 8, 2024.

PLACE: The meeting was held in the Board Room located on the sixth 
floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW, Washington, 
DC.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit 
Insurance Corporation met to consider matters related to the 
Corporation's corporate activities. In calling the meeting, the Board 
determined, on motion of Director Jonathan McKernan, seconded by 
Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), 
by the unanimous vote of Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Vice Chairman 
Travis Hill, Director Jonathan McKernan, Director Michael J. Hsu 
(Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and Director Rohit Chopra 
(Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), that Corporation 
business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the 
subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; 
that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public 
interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open 
to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a 
closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2) and (c)(6), of the 
``Government in the Sunshine Act'' (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2) and(c)(6)).

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Requests for further information 
concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive 
Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

    Dated this the 8th day of October, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-23688 Filed 10-9-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
# 2/^ rtment of Ene rgy Washington , DC 20585 June 14, 2001

PUBLIC WORKSHOP ON THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY RULEMAKING PROCESS

FOR RESIDENTIAL FURNACES AND BOILERS
The Department of Energy (Department) is convening a public workshop to discuss and receive comments on issues it will address and the process it will follow in considering the adoption of energy conservation standards for residential furnaces and boilers. The Department has prepared a Framework Document to explain and discuss the process, analyses and issues concerning the development of such standards. For many of the issues and analyses, the Framework Document sets forth approaches that the Department is considering. The workshop will be held on Tuesday , July 17, 2001 from 9 : 00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. in Room 1E-245 at the U.S. Department of Energy , 1000 Independence Avenue, SW , Washington, D.C. 20585. Please note that foreign nationals visiting DOE Headquarters are subject to advance security screening procedures

. If you are a foreign national and wish to participate in the workshop , please inform DOE of this fact as soon as possible by contacting Ms. Brenda Edwards- Jones at (202 ) 586-2945 so that the necessary procedures can be completed

. The agenda is enclosed and a copy of the Federal Register Notice and Framework Document is located at

" http: //www.eren.doe

. gov/buildings/codes

standards/". If you plan to attend the workshop, have any questions, or wish to obtain additional background materials, please contact Ms. Brenda Edwards-Jones by telephone at 202-586-2945, or by telefax at 202-586-4617. I look forward to seeing you at the workshop.

Edward O. Pollock, Jr., Director Office of Building Research and Standards Office of Building Technology, State and Community Programs Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ARTURO GUX GOUXLA,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 11-72537

Agency No. A095-757-431

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 14, 2013** 

Before: LEAVY, THOMAS, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Arturo Gux Gouxla, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal

from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). 

FILED

MAY 17 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial

evidence the agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056

(9th Cir. 2009), and we dismiss in part and deny in part the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s denial of Gouxla’s asylum and CAT

claims. See Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 678 (9th Cir. 2004) (no jurisdiction

over legal claims not presented to the BIA).

Gouxla fears harm by individuals with whom he had a land dispute between

1988 and 1990. Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of withholding

of removal because Gouxla failed to establish the Guatemalan government was

unable or unwilling to control these individuals. See Rahimzadeh v. Holder, 613

F.3d 916, 920 (9th Cir. 2010). 

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED in part; DENIED in part.

2 11-72537
### EPA held a pollution prevention ( P2 ) - focused Webinar on April 24, 2014 to explain the

proposed changes to facilities and seek input. A total of 380 participants attended the webinar , and fifty messages were submitted using the question box . These messages are also addressed in the Response to Comment document. Any additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice. Here is the question log from the webinar. The recording of the Pollution Prevention (P2) focus ed Webinar is posted at the bottom of this page http://www2.epa.gov/toxics - release - inventory - tri program/tri - laws - rulemakings - and - notices . For any questions please contact Daniel Teitelbaum ( Teitelbaum . daniel@epa.gov or 202 - 566 - 0964)
SHARE

# Lindsey Twardy

              -  Fact Sheets 
              -  Timeline of ORNL Science 
              -  Leadership Team 
              -  Interactive Map 
              -  Diversity 
              -  Organization 
              -  Who we are, aren't 
              -  Community Engagement 
              -  History 
              -  Honors and Awards 
              -  Environmental Protection 
              -  Quality (ISO9001) 
              -  Research Integrity 
              -  Working at ORNL 

Lindsey Twardy

## Chief of Staff

Lindsey Twardy is Chief of Staff at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. In this role, she serves as an advisor to the Laboratory Director and helps to integrate leadership across ORNL to advance the Lab’s vision, fulfill mission objectives, and ensure operational effectiveness.

Lindsey joined ORNL in 2013 and has served as the executive business partner to the Lab Director, as well as the ORNL protocol and executive communications officer. Prior to joining the Laboratory, she was vice president for the East Tennessee Economic Council (ETEC), where she developed relationships across Oak Ridge’s DOE contractor community and with local, state, and federal officials. She is a former ETEC board member and currently serves on The National GEM Consortium Board of Directors.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation 

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of November 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as CertificateAdministrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of andfor the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreementhas been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Stephen V, Williams, Chief Executive Officer of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31,
2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 3, 2010By: /s/ Stephen V. WilliamsChief
      Executive Officer(Principal
      Executive Officer)
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2780

To authorize the Drug Enforcement Administration to provide reimbursements for expenses incurred to remediate methamphetamine laboratories,

and for other purposes.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 23, 2000

Mr. BAUCUS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize the Drug Enforcement Administration to provide reimbursements for expenses incurred to remediate

methamphetamine laboratories, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Emergency Meth5 amphetamine Response Act of 2000’’.
2

•S 2780 IS

1 SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT BY DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMIN2 ISTRATION OF EXPENSES INCURRED TO RE3 MEDIATE METHAMPHETAMINE LABORA4 TORIES.

5 (a) REIMBURSEMENT AUTHORIZED.—The Attorney

6 General, acting through the Administrator of the Drug

7 Enforcement Administration, may reimburse States, units

8 of local government, Indian tribal governments, other pub9 lic entities, and multi-jurisdictional or regional consortia

10 thereof for expenses incurred to clean up and safely dis11 pose of substances associated with clandestine meth12 amphetamine laboratories which may present a danger to

13 public health or the environment.

14 (b) ADDITIONAL DEA PERSONNEL.—From amounts

15 appropriated or otherwise made available to carry out this

16 section, the Attorney General may hire not more than 5

17 additional Drug Enforcement Administration personnel to

18 administer this section.

19 (c) FUNDING.—

20 (1) FISCAL YEAR 2000.—From the unobligated

21 balances available to the Department of Justice for

22 fiscal year 2000 to carry out part Q of the Omnibus

23 Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, known

24 as the Community Oriented Policing Services pro25 gram (42 U.S.C. 3796dd et seq.), the Attorney Gen-
3

•S 2780 IS

1 eral shall make available $10,000,000 to be used

2 only to carry out this section.

3 (2) FISCAL YEAR 2001.—There are authorized

4 to be appropriated to the Attorney General to carry

5 out this section $20,000,000 for fiscal year 2001.

Æ