alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 23, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), R Consortium, Inc. (“R Consortium”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Novartis, Hanover, NJ, has been added as a party to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and R Consortium intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On September 15, 2015, R Consortium filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on October 2, 2015 (80 FR 59815).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 22, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 52090).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-23625 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### Dziengel, Respondent, vs. Dziengel, Appellant.

*April 4*

May *3, 1955.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Sydney M. Eisen-berg*and *Joseph B. Michalski,*both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Eisenberg.*

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by *John L. Newman*and *T. F. Swietlik,*both of Milwaukee.

*592Gehl, J.

Counsel for defendant-appellant have failed m the preparation of their brief and appendix to comply with several rules of the court. Their failure has not aided us in our study of their appeal. 'Although there are over 300 pages in the bill of exceptions their statement of facts consists of but two pages, in which no reference is made to the pages of the appendix for the statements of fact made, Supreme Court Rule 6 (3). The appendix does not contain the opinion of the trial court, Rule 6 (5) (a). No part of the findings is printed in the appendix, Rule 6 (5) (b). What is offered in the appendix as an abridgment of the testimony which covers over 300 pages of the bill of exceptions appears on only 17 pages of the appendix.

The rules of court were made to enable us, in the limited time which we have, to give due consideration to all the cases presented to us. Were each of us to search a long bill of exceptions for evidence supporting appellant’s contention, we would be left with insufficient time for consideration of the cases which are submitted with properly prepared briefs and appendices. Litigants whose attorneys comply with the rules are entitled to more than that. We call attention to what we said so recently regarding these rules in *Peterson Cutting Die Co. v. Bach Sales Co.,*ante, p. 113, 68 N. W. (2d) 804.

The court found that plaintiff advanced to defendant $5,500, which sum she used in the purchase of a house and lot in Milwaukee, found to have a value of $14,500. An examination of the trial court’s memorandum opinion, and of the meager abridgment of the testimony contained in appellant’s appendix, discloses that there was testimony to support the finding. We should not disturb the finding nor the judgment by the terms of which only that which the husband had given to the wife prior to, and during the short period of their marriage, four months, is ordered returned to him.

Plaintiff has made a motion for review contending that the court was too liberal in its allowance to the widow. Many conflicting stories were told regarding the dealings between *593these people. The trial judge gave all the evidence his careful study; that he made a thorough analysis of the testimony is disclosed by the contents of his memorandum opinion. Issues of fact were presented. We have found no reason to disturb the court’s conclusions.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### KENNINGTON v. STATE.

No. 17794.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Crumpton & Boswell, of Texarkana, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is transporting spirituous liquor capable of producing intoxication; the, punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for 18 months.

Pending appeal, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which conviction was had has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666—49). See Guy Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481, this day delivered.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
##### 



CENTERPOINT ENERGY RESOURCES CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(AN INDIRECT WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF CENTERPOINT ENERGY, INC.)
 COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Millions of Dollars)
 Six Months EndedJune 30,2006
    
    
    2007Net Income
    
    $
    120
    
    
    $
    161Income taxes
    
    
    71
    
    
    
    95Capitalized interest
    
    
    (1
    )
    
    
    (10
    )190
    
    
    
    246Fixed charges, as defined:Interest
    
    
    82
    
    
    
    84Capitalized interest
    
    
    1
    
    
    
    10Interest component of rentals charged to operating income
    
    
    7
    
    
    
    7Total fixed charges
    
    
    90
    
    
    
    101Earnings, as defined
    
    $
    280
    
    
    $
    347Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    3.10
    
    
    
    3.44
##### 



FORM OF
STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT
FOR THE GRANT OF
NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTIONS UNDER THE
STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.
2007 STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN




---



##### 



2




---



##### 



3




---



##### 



4




---



##### 



STEWART ENTERPRISES, INC.By:James W. McFarland,Chairman of the Compensation Committee

of the Board of Directors 5
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In connection with the Quarterly Report of 4th Grade Films, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), we, James Doolin, President and Director, and Shane Thueson, Vice President and Director, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.








Date:
02/08/11

By:
/s/James DoolinJames DoolinPrincipal Financial Officer, President & DirectorDate:
02/08/11

By:
/s/Shane ThuesonShane ThuesonPrincipal Executive Officer, Vice President & Director
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS.1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q (the  "Report") of Techs
Loanstar,  Inc. (the  "Company") for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, each of
the undersigned  Gary  Pizzacalla,  the Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,
and, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of the undersigned's knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in
                  all material respects,  the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

Dated: December 20, 2009             /s/ GARY PIZZACALLA
                                     ___________________________________________
                                     Gary Pizzacalla
                                     Gary Pizzacalla
                                     President, Secretary Treasurer, Director
                                     (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3636 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3636

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow labor 
 organizations and management organizations to receive the results of 
 visa petitions about which such organizations have submitted advisory 
                               opinions.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oversee Visa Integrity with 
Stakeholder Advisories Act'' or the ``O-VISA Act''.

SEC. 2. ALLOWING CERTAIN ORGANIZATIONS TO RECEIVE THE RESULTS OF VISA 
              PETITIONS.

    Section 214(c)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1184(c)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``Attorney General'' each place it appears 
        and inserting ``Secretary of Homeland Security''; and
            (2) in the first sentence of the matter following 
        subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``and (iv)'' and inserting 
                ``(iv)''; and
                    (B) by striking the period at the end and inserting 
                the following: ``, and (v) upon making the decision, 
                the Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide a copy 
                of the decision to each organization with which the 
                Secretary consulted under subparagraph (A) or (B).''.

            Passed the House of Representatives June 13, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3636

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

      To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to allow labor 
 organizations and management organizations to receive the results of 
 visa petitions about which such organizations have submitted advisory 
                               opinions.
```
***Exhibit 32.2***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q/A of Abakan Inc., for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Mark W. Sullivan, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)   This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: September 23, 2011

 

 

/s/ Mark W. Sullivan

Mark W. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer 

 

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
# L_2011338EN.01000101.xml

| 21.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 338/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 338/1

---

ADDENDUM

to Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 September 2011 on textile fibre names and related labelling and marking of the fibre composition of textile products and repealing Council Directive 73/44/EEC and Directives 96/73/EC and 2008/121/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

(Official Journal of the European Union L 272 of 18 October 2011)

The following Statement is added to Regulation (EU) No 1007/2011:

STATEMENT BY THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL

The European Parliament and the Council are mindful of the importance of providing accurate information to consumers, in particular when products are marked with an indication of origin, so as to protect them against fraudulent, inaccurate or misleading claims. The use of new technologies, such as electronic labelling, including radio frequency identification, may be a useful tool to provide such information while keeping pace with technical development. The European Parliament and the Council invite the Commission, when drawing up the report pursuant to Article 24 of the Regulation, to consider their impact on possible new labelling requirements, including with a view to improve the traceability of products.

---
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of STWC Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10‐Q for the quarter ended April
        30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned principal executive and financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
              the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
              the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:  June 14, 2019
 
 
 /s/Erin Phillips
 Erin Phillips, CEO and Treasurer
 (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00071

- CR

J ARED F ORD

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (15 27494R)

April 4, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s murder judgment. We affirm that

judgment. But we hold that t here was error in the trial court’s aggravated

- robbery

judgment. Accordingly, w e modif y the trial court’s aggravated

- robbery judgment to

reflect a sentence of ten years’ confinement

. As modified, we affirm the trial court’s

aggravated

- robbery judgment.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Bruce
Harmon, Interim Chief Financial Officer, of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31,
2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
      February 3, 2010By: /s/ Bruce HarmonInterim
      Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Diane Button, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: August 26, 2011  /s/ Diane Button Diane Button President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-1291

RONALD S. DICK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

F. DAVID MATTHEWS, Secretary, Department of

Health, Education and Welfare; JAMES B.

CARDWELL, Chairman, Social Security Administration; ROBERT HAMPTON, Chairman, Civil Service Commission,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-76-512-H)

Submitted: September 30, 1998 Decided: October 13, 1998

Before ERVIN, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronald S. Dick, Appellant Pro Se. Allen F. Loucks, OFFICE OF THE

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronald S. Dick appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the order of the district court because Dick has failed

to show entitlement to relief as required under Fed. R. Civ. P.

60(b). Dick v. Matthews, No. CA-76-512-H (D. Md. Feb. 11, 1997). We

deny Dick’s motion requesting that the “appeal be decided by a

series of cases before the MSPB,” that “issue 1 of this appeal be

enforced against appellee,” and to “Close Case Without Findings

Against SSA;” we also deny Appellees’ motion to dismiss. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Board of Scientific Counselors, NIA, October 22, 2024, 8 a.m. to October 24, 2024, 11:30 a.m., National Institutes of Health, Biomedical Research Center, 251 Bayview Boulevard, Baltimore, MD, 21224 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 9, 2024, 89 FR 56395.                

The following FRN is being amended to change the meeting times from 8 a.m.-2 p.m. to 8 a.m.-4:30 p.m. on October 22, 2024; from 8 a.m.-6 p.m. to 8 a.m.-5 p.m. on October 23, 2024; from 8 a.m.-11:30 a.m. to 8 a.m.-1:30 p.m. on October 24, 2024. The meeting is partially closed to the public.

Dated: October 8, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-23636 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# L_2012053DE.01001401.xml

| 25.2.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 53/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 53/14

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 451/2011 des Rates vom 6. Mai 2011 zur Einführung eines endgültigen Antidumpingzolls und zur endgültigen Vereinnahmung des vorläufigen Zolls auf die Einfuhren von gestrichenem Feinpapier mit Ursprung in der Volksrepublik China

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 128 vom 14. Mai 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 128 vom 14. Mai 2011

Seite 17, Artikel 1 Absatz 1:

anstatt:

„(1)   Es wird ein vorläufiger Antidumpingzoll eingeführt ...“

muss es heißen:

„(1)   Es wird ein endgültiger Antidumpingzoll eingeführt ...“

Seite 17, Artikel 2:

anstatt:

„Die Sicherheitsleistungen für den vorläufigen Antidumpingzoll gemäß der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1042/2010 werden in Höhe des in Artikel 1 der genannten Verordnung festgesetzten endgültigen Zolls endgültig vereinnahmt.“

muss es heißen:

„Die Sicherheitsleistungen für den vorläufigen Antidumpingzoll gemäß der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1042/2010 werden in Höhe des in Artikel 1 der genannten Verordnung festgesetzten Zolls endgültig vereinnahmt.“

---