alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23571]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20672 and #20673; KANSAS Disaster Number KS-
20016]

Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for Public 
Assistance Only for the State of Kansas

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 1.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for Public Assistance Only for the State of Kansas 
(FEMA-4824-DR), dated September 24, 2024.

DATES: Issued on October 4, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: November 25, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 24, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for Private Non-Profit organizations in the State of 
Kansas, dated September 24, 2024, is hereby amended to include the 
following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.
    Incident: Severe Storms, Straight-line Winds, Tornadoes, and 
Flooding.
    Incident Period: June 26, 2024 through July 7, 2024.
Primary Counties: Logan, Pawnee, Wallace.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-23571 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
```
EX-10.3(d)



 Exhibit 10.3(d) 

August 8, 2014 
 Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC 

522 Fifth Avenue, 13th Floor 
 New York, New York 10036 

 

	Re:	Ceres Managed Futures LLC: Amended Schedules 1 and 2 to the Alternative Investment Selling Agent Agreement 


Ladies and Gentlemen: 
 Pursuant to paragraph
13(c) of the Alternative Investment Selling Agent Agreement dated November 12, 2013, as amended on March 1, 2014; April 7, 2014 and as further amended from time to time (the “Agreement”), between, among others, Ceres
Managed Futures LLC (“CMF”), the general partner of each of the limited partnerships listed on Schedule 1 thereto (each, a “Partnership,” and together, the “Partnerships”), and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
(“MSSB”), CMF is hereby confirming that Schedules 1 and 2 to the Agreement are hereby deleted in their entirety and replaced with Schedules 1 and 2 attached hereto effective as of October 1, 2014. 

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in the Agreement, by signing below MSSB hereby agrees to, acknowledges and accepts the amendment of
the Agreement, effective as of October 1, 2014. 







 If the foregoing is in accordance with your understanding of our discussions, kindly sign and
return to us a counterpart hereof (by mail, facsimile or email) as soon as possible. 
 Sincerely, 

 

			
	CERES MANAGED FUTURES LLC
		
	By:	 	/s/ Alper Daglioglu
		 	 Alper Daglioglu
 President and
Director

	
	 EACH PARTNERSHIP LISTED ON
 SCHEDULE
1 HERETO

	
	 By: Ceres Managed Futures LLC, the

general partner of each Partnership

		
	By:	 	/s/ Alper Daglioglu
		 	Alper Daglioglu
		 	President and Director


  

			
	 Confirmed, accepted and agreed to:
  

MORGAN STANLEY SMITH BARNEY LLC

		
	By:	 	/s/ Jeremy Beal
	Name:	 	Jeremy Beal
	Title:	 	Executive Director


  
 Page 2 








 SCHEDULE 1 
  

					
	 PARTNERSHIP
	  	 STATE AND DATE OF ORGANIZATION
	  	 EFFECTIVE DATE

	Managed Futures Premier Warrington L.P.	  	New York, November 28, 2005	  	October 1, 2013


  
 Page 3 








 SCHEDULE 2 
  

			
	 PARTNERSHIP
	  	 ONGOING SELLING AGENT FEE

	Managed Futures Premier Warrington L.P.	  	2.00% per year of the adjusted net assets of Class A Units and 0.75% per year of the adjusted net assets of Class D Units (computed monthly by multiplying the adjusted net assets of the Class A Units by 2.00% and the adjusted net
assets of the Class D Units by 0.75% and dividing the result thereof by 12)1

  

	1 	Adjusted net assets are month-end Net Assets increased by that month’s ongoing selling agent fee, advisory fee, profit share allocation accrual, the general partner’s administrative fee and other expenses and
any redemptions or distributions as of the end of such month. 


  
 Page 4
Order entered July 31, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 18 - 00124 - CR No. 05 - 18 - 0012 5 - CR CHRISTON DIOR CONNER , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On App eal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F17 - 56395 - M & F17 - 56396 - M



### O RDER The reporter’s record in the above appeals was due April 3, 2018. When it was not filed, we notified court reporter Belinda Baraka by postcard dated June 6, 2018 and directed her to file, by July 6, 2018, (1) the reporter’s record, (2) written verification that no hearings were recorded, or (3) written verification that appellant had not requested the reporter’s record. To date, the rep orter’s record has not been filed and we have had no communication from Ms. Baraka. We note that the clerk’s record has been filed. The record reflects appellant is indigent and that appointed counsel submitted a written request for the reporter’s record on February 9, 2018. We ORDER court reporter Belinda Baraka to file, WITHIN FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, the complete reporter’s record in these appeals. Ms. Baraka is cautioned thatthe failure to do so will result in the Court taking whatev er action it deems appropriate to ensure

that these appeals proceed in a more timely fashion, which may include ordering that Ms. Baraka not sit as a court reporter until the reporter’s record in th e appeal s is filed. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Ernest White, Presiding Judge, 194th Judicial District Court; Belinda Baraka, official court reporter, 194th Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all parties.

. /s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-902 Date: January 15, 2002 

Subject: Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program Focus Groups 

Our insurance partners for the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program, LTC Partners (John 

Hancock and MetLife), will be conducting focus groups of employees and annuitants this month. 

They want feedback from the focus groups to fine-tune some of the product details, such as what 

plan features will have the broadest market appeal, and what product names seem to be more 

acceptable to the groups. 

How many people will participate in these groups? 

Approximately 100 people will participate in total, including Federal employees and annuitants, 

and members and retired members of the uniformed services. Implementation coordinators and 

employees working in human resources offices will not be eligible to participate. 

Will any employees in my agency be chosen to participate?

Because of the small number of participants government-wide, the chance that anyone from your 

agency will be contacted is mighty slim. But if indeed they are, we wanted to make sure you 

knew about the initiative in case you’re approached with any questions. 

How will employees be chosen? 

LTC Partners is contracting with companies that specialize in holding focus groups. Those 

companies have standing panels of people interested in participating in focus groups. They will 

contact members of the panels who have indicated that they are Federal employees or members 

of the uniformed services. 

How will annuitants be chosen? 

OPM will provide names and addresses of annuitants and is asking for the same information 

from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service. LTC Partners will select names from those 

lists. 
2

When will the focus groups take place? 

They’ll take place in late January. Sessions will be held in the evening, so employees who are 

chosen will not be participating during normal business hours. 

Where will the focus groups take place? 

They’ll take place in Bethesda, Maryland; Fayetteville, North Carolina; and Jacksonville, Florida. 

Is there anything we need to do? 

No, there really isn’t. If you or your employees have any questions about this research, please 

call Laura Lawrence on my staff at 202-606-1433 or email ltc@opm.gov. 

Thanks for your cooperation as we continue with the myriad of details in rolling out this 

program! 

 Sincerely, 

 Frank D. Titus 

 Assistant Director 

 for Long Term Care
1

Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 10:12 AM

To: 'rayjobe@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov'

Subject: Petition for Exemption: Replicopy, Inc. FAA-2014-1030

April 2, 2015 

Mr. Raymond V. Jobe 

Counsel for Replicopy Inc. d/b/a/ RDM Productions 

Law Office of Raymond V. Jobe 

8150 North Central Expressway, Suite. 747 

Dallas, Texas 75206-1990 

Dear Mr. Jobe: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1030). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft makes, models, and types (i.e. - fixed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The descriptions should include the maximum weight (including 

payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit 

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e-mail to 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by April 16, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without 

notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

Nia Daniels, ARM‐108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075

nia.daniels@faa.gov
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

MEMORANDUM

Date/ Time: July 15, 2010 / 11 a.m. - 12 p.m.

Subject: Aldicarb Meeting Minutes. OPP Meets wi th Bayer Crop-Science to Discuss Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Revised Aggregate Dietary Exposure

and Risk Assessment for Aldicarb

From: K. Avivah Jakob, Chemical Review Manager Re-evaluation Managment and Implimentation Branch IV Pestcide Re-evaulation Division (7508P)

Partcipants: Anne Overstreet (EPA), K. Avivah Ja kob (EPA), Christine Olinger (EPA), Michael Metzger (EPA), Linda Taylor (EPA), Elissa Reaves (EPA); Larry Hodges (Bayer Crop-Science); Ian Kelly (Bayer Crop-Science); Russel Jones (Bayer Crop- Science)

Meeting Minutes: The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) O ffice of Pesticide Programs (OPP) requested a meeting with Bayer Crop-Science (Bayer) to di scuss preliminary results from EPA’s revised acute probabilistic aggregate dietary (food and dr inking water) exposure and risk assessment for

aldicarb. The revised 2010 risk assessment is based on comparative chol inesterase assay (CCA) and new food and residue data which were recently submitted to the Agency. EPA’s revised dietary exposure and risk assessment indicate s that aldicarb no longer meets the Agency’s rigorous food safety standards and may pose unaccepta ble dietary risks, especially to infants and young children.

EPA met with Bayer Crop-Science, the technical registrant of aldicarb, on July 15, 2010 and provided an overview of EPA’s re vised dietary risk assessment. On July 13, 2010 EPA sent the following two documents to Bayer via e-mail: a su mmary of the revised aldicarb dietary risk assessment, dated July 2010 and the Aldicarb: Review of Compara tive Cholinesterase Assays (Dose-Response, Time Course, Compar ative Dose, and Range-finding Studies), dated July 13, 2010. During the meeting EPA provided signed copies of the following supporting science

documents: Aldicarb. FQPA Safety Factor Revision, dated July 13, 2010; Recovery Half-Lives for RBC and Brain Acetylcholinesterase in Adult and Pup Rats Exposed to Aldicarb, dated July 14, 2010; and Statistical Review of Sielken, R. (2010) Benchmark Doses for Brain and RBS Acetylcholinesterase in Adult and Pups Exposed to Aldicarb, dated July 1, 2010. During the meeting, EPA and the registrant discussed the scie ntific approaches used by the Agency in its most recent exposure and risk assessment. Al so, EPA and Bayer briefly discussed possible mitigation approaches for aldicarb based upon the revised dietary risk assessment. OPP will continue discussions with the registra nt to address these risks of concern.
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 16-85V

Filed: June 3, 2016

UNPUBLISHED

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

SCOTT CURTIS, *

*

Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

v. * Influenza;

* Shoulder Injury (“SIRVA”);

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”)

AND HUMAN SERVICES, *

*

Respondent. *

*

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Paul Brazil, Muller Brazil, LLP, Dresher, PA, for petitioner.

Lisa Ann Watts, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On January 15, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a right shoulder injury related to 

vaccine administration (“SIRVA”) caused in fact by an influenza vaccination 

administered on November 5, 2014. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the 

Special Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On June 2, 2016, respondent filed a Rule 4(c) Report and Proffer on 

Compensation Award in which she concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation 

in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent “opines that 

petitioner experienced SIRVA of the right upper extremity within 48 hours of flu vaccine 

administration” and further stated that [n]o other causes for petitioner’s SIRVA have 

been identified.” Further, respondent “agrees that petitioner’s SIRVA was more likely 

 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

than not caused by the November 5, 2014, flu vaccination.” Id. at 4. Respondent 

further agrees that petitioner met the statutory six month sequela requirement and that 

all legal prerequisites for compensation under the Vaccine Act have been met. Id.

In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey

Nora Beth Dorsey

Chief Special Master
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6089 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6089

**Commission Decision of 24/01/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6089 - PAI / HUNKEMOLLER) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 24.1.2011

SG-Greffe(2010) D/1250

C(2010) 446

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6089 – PAI / HUNKEMOLLER Notification of 16.12.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 353, 28.12.2010, p.22

1. On 16.12.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which PAI Partners S.A.S. ("PAI", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Hunkemöller International B.V. ("HKM", The Netherlands) by way of purchase of shares.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for PAI : private equity fund

- for HKM : retail sale of different types of women's underwear.

2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-6 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-6 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jennifer M. DavisName: Jennifer M. DavisTitle: Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 29, 2016/s/ Rich MorrinName: Rich MorrinTitle: Chief Operating OfficerDate: March 29, 2016
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-10915 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus GARY DON BYRD, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:96-CR-10-1

- - - - - - - - - - April 3, 1997 Before REAVLEY, JONES and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Gary Don Byrd appeals his sentence following his guilty plea to bank fraud. Byrd contends that the district court erred in finding that he was an organizer or leader of a criminal activity involving five or more participants and that the activity was otherwise extensive. We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and hold that the district court’s finding was not clearly erroneous. United States v. Ronning , 47 F.3d 710, 712 (5th Cir. 1995).
AFFIRMED.
MITT ROMNEY

Governor KERRY HEALEY Lieutenant Governor


### Hand Delivered January 4, 2007 Regulations Division Office of the Secretary of State One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Dear Sir/Madam

: ARLEEN O'DONNELL Commissioner

Enclosed is a legal notice of the public hearings and public comment period to be offered by the Department of Environmental Protection. The amendments address revisions to 310 CMR7.00 Air Pollution Regulations. It is proposed to amend regulations 310 CMR 7.00 to address a number ofissues: update list of Massachusetts cities and towns to reflect changes in regional boundaries; clarify the particulate emissions limits to which engines and turbines are subject ; add a new organic material emissions cap (<10 tons per year) to several sections of 7.03 to streamline the process for owners/operators of "small" facilities to limit potential emissions below the Source Registration and annual compliance fee thresholds; and modify the Boiler - ERP requirements, 310 CMR 7.26(30) - (37) . Please publish this legal notice in the Massachusetts Re lg'ster on January 26, 2007. If you have any questions, please call me at (617) 292-5624. Thank you. Sincerely,
aren L. Regas COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ONE WINTER STREET, BOSTON, MA 02108 617-292-5500
ROBERT W . GOLLEDGE, Jr. Secretary

Business Compliance Division

This information is available in alternate format. Call Donald D9. Comes, ADA Coordinator at 617-556-1057 . TDD Setviee =_1-800-298-22071 MassDEPon the World Wide Web: http:/%www .mass.gov/dep ~ ~~ . 0Printed on Recycled Paper (" LNZ