alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### RIGGS et al. v. WILLIS et al.

No. 12524.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Jan. 24, 1931.

Rehearing Denied March 14, 1931.

*266Marshall & King, of Graham, and Bulling-ton, Boone, Humphrey & King, of Wichita Falls, for appellants.

Kilgore & Rogers, of Wichita Falls, and Fred T. Arnold, of Graham, for appellees.

CONNER, C. J.

We have carefully considered the evidence in the record and feel unable to say that the trial court’s findings of fact are not súf-ficiently supported; and those findings and the court’s conclusions of law are so full and clear that it becomes unnecessary to undertake to add thereto. Accordingly, the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are adopted, and the judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

The point that seems to be especially stressed in the motion for rehearing is embodied in the contention that the evidence shows that the appellee E. D. Willis is es-topped from acquiring title to the 9.9-acre strip of land in controversy. We have read the case of Mars v. Morris, 48 Tex. Civ. App. 216, 106 S. W. 430, and feel no inclination to criticize the rules relating to estoppel as set forth in the opinion in that case. But in our reading of the evidence in the case before us we felt unable to say that the trial court erred in concluding that the deeds under which appellee claims define the extent of the boundary of the lands described. It is true that the evidence does show that Willis pointed out the fence on the west line of the Graham lands as the east boundary line of the original lease, but there was evidence at least tending to show, as we thought, that the conversation in which this occurred was incidental and not asserted as a fact upon which the original agreement was founded. It is to be remembered that in the conveyances of the lease under which the appellee claims there is no call for the fence or the west line of the Graham lands. There was at the time a known excess in the Kirkland lands, and we felt unable, and still feel unable, to say that the trial court erred in concluding under all of the circumstances that the estoppel claimed was not sufficiently definite and certain to preclude appellees’ recovery.

The motion for rehearing is accordingly overruled.
#                                                     Morgan L  McCorkle                                            

###                         S&T Communications Manager                    

## Contact

mccorkleml@ornl.gov|865.574.7308

## Publications

##   ESM of Ionic and Electrochemical Phenomena on the Nanoscale...

December, 2011

View All
EXHIBIT 23.2
 [Cooper Engineering Company, Inc. Letterhead]














September 15, 2015


Emerge Energy Services LP 180 State Street, Suite 225 Southlake, TX 76092


Ladies and Gentlemen:


The undersigned hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3, including any amendment thereto, any related prospectus and any related prospectus supplement (the “Registration Statement”), of information contained in Emerge Energy Services LP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Annual Report”) relating to our reports setting forth the estimates of reserves of Superior Silica Sands LLC as of December 31, 2014. We also consent to all references to us contained in such Registration Statement, including in the prospectus under the heading “Experts.”





Respectfully submitted,


/s/ Bruce Markgren





Bruce Markgren, P.E.


President


Cooper Engineering Company, Inc.
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED): January 16, 2008
 
 NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
  Delaware
    
    001-31465
    
    35-2164875(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission File
    
    (I.R.S. Employerof incorporation or organization)
    
    Number)
    
    Identification No.)601 Jefferson, Suite 3600Houston, Texas
    
    
    
    77002(Address of principal executive
    
    
    
    (Zip code)offices)
 (713) 751-7507
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
  Item .01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements And Exhibits.
 (c) Exhibits
 10.1
    
    Natural Resource Partners Second Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan99.1
    
    Press Release dated January 16, 2008.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  NATURAL RESOURCE PARTNERS L.P.
(Registrant)By:
    
    NRP (GP) LPits General PartnerBy:
    
    GP Natural Resource Partners LLCits General Partner/s/ Wyatt L. HoganWyatt L. HoganVice President and General Counsel
# L_2011056EN.01000701.xml

| 1.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 56/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 56/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 196/2011

of 28 February 2011

cancelling the registration of a name in the Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Rieser Weizenbier (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular Article 12(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and pursuant to Article 17(2) of the same Regulation, the application submitted by Germany to cancel the name ‘Rieser Weizenbier’ in the Register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2), |
| --- | --- |

(1)

In accordance with the second subparagraph of Article 12(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, and pursuant to Article 17(2) of the same Regulation, the application submitted by Germany to cancel the name ‘Rieser Weizenbier’ in the Register was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2),

| (2) | As no objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, registration of this name must therefore be cancelled, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection within the meaning of Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, registration of this name must therefore be cancelled,

| (3) | In light of the above, this name must therefore be removed from the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

In light of the above, this name must therefore be removed from the ‘Register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications’,

| (4) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Protected Geographical Indications and Protected Designations of Origin, |
| --- | --- |

(4)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Standing Committee on Protected Geographical Indications and Protected Designations of Origin,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Registration of the name listed in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby cancelled.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 February 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12

1

(2)  
  OJ C 300, 10.12.2009, p. 22

2

---

ANNEX

Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 510/2006:

Class 2.1.   Beers

GERMANY

Rieser Weizenbier (PGI)

---
Exhibit 23.1**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**Legacy Reserves LP
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**In connection with this quarterly report of ML ChesapeakeFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September30, 2007 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this“Report”), I, Robert D. Ollwerther, Chief Executive Officer and President ofMerrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager of ML ChesapeakeFuturesAccess LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: November 14, 2007               |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| By                                    | /s/ ROBERT D. OLLWERTHER |   |
| Robert D. Ollwerther                  |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |

 

----
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 
 N E W S   R E L E A S E
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    
    Contact:November 15, 2007
    
    Investor Relations Dept.(800) 536-7453
 TORCH ENERGY ROYALTY TRUST RECEIVES REVOCATION OF REQUEST FOR SPECIAL MEETING OF UNITHOLDERS TO TERMINATE THE TRUST
    Page 1 of 3




---



##### 



Additional Information Concerning Torch, the Administrative Services Provider:
   Page 2 of 3




---



##### 



Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 10.6
 RENEGY HOLDINGS, INC.
2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(As Amended and Restated February 5, 2008)
 NOTICE OF GRANT OF STOCK OPTION
 Exhibit A
 ParticipantAddress:
  Grant NumberDate of GrantVesting Commencement
DateNumber of Shares
GrantedExercise Price per Share
    

    $Total Exercise Price
    

    $Type of Option
    
    
    
    Incentive Stock Option (Note:
Participant must be an Employee. Also
see Plan for limitations applicable to
Employees who are 10% shareholders.)Nonstatutory Stock OptionTerm/Expiration Date
 Vesting Schedule
  th




---



##### 



Termination Period
   PARTICIPANT
    
    
    
    RENEGY HOLDINGS, INC.Signature
    
    
    
    ByPrint Name
    
    
    
    TitleAddress:
  - 2 -




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A  TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF STOCK OPTION GRANT
 Grant
  Vesting Schedule
 Administrator Discretion
 Exercise of Option
 Exhibit B
  A-1




---



##### 



Method of Payment
     Tax Obligations
 Withholding of Taxes
 Notice of Disqualifying Disposition of ISO Shares
 Section 409A
  A-2




---



##### 



Rights as Stockholder
 No Guarantee of Continued Service
 Address for Notices
 Grant is Not Transferable
 Binding Agreement
 Additional Conditions to Issuance of Stock
  A-3




---



##### 



Plan Governs
 Administrator Authority
 Electronic Delivery
 Captions
 Agreement Severable
 Modifications to the Agreement
 Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan
 Governing Law
  A-4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT B  RENEGY HOLDINGS, INC.
2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(As Amended and Restated February 5, 2008)
 EXERCISE NOTICE
 
  Exercise of Option
 Delivery of Payment
 Representations of Purchaser
 Rights as Stockholder
 Tax Consultation
  B-1




---



##### 



Entire Agreement; Governing Law
 Submitted by:
    
    
    
    Accepted by:PURCHASER
    
    
    
    RENEGY HOLDINGS, INC.Signature
    
    
    
    ByPrint Name
    
    
    
    ItsAddress:Date Received
  B-2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7640

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. AKBAR TAYLOR, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:05-cr-00330-JRS-1)

Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Akbar Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Akbar Taylor appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction submitted under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and find no abuse of discretion. Accordingly, because the amendments to the Guidelines did not affect his offense level, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

See United States v. Taylor , No. 3:05-cr-00330-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. July 28, 2008). We note Taylor was not entitled to a resentencing hearing. See United States v. Dunphy , 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009) (“[A] district judge is not authorized to reduce a defendant’s sentence below the amended guideline range.”). We also deny Taylor’s motion for remand. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# L_2012342DE.01004802.xml

| 14.12.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 342/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 342/48

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 65/2011 der Kommission vom 27. Januar 2011 mit Durchführungsbestimmungen zur Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1698/2005 des Rates hinsichtlich der Kontrollverfahren und der Einhaltung anderweitiger Verpflichtungen bei Maßnahmen zur Förderung der Entwicklung des ländlichen Raums

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 25 vom 28. Januar 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 25 vom 28. Januar 2011

Seite 13, Artikel 15 Absatz 4 erster Satz:

anstatt:

„(4)   Die tatsächliche Feldbesichtigung im Rahmen einer Vor-Ort-Kontrolle kann jedoch auf eine Stichprobe von mindestens 50 % der Flächen begrenzt werden, sofern die Stichprobe ein verlässliches und repräsentatives Kontrollniveau sowohl in Bezug auf die kontrollierte Fläche als auch in Bezug auf die beantragte Beihilfe gewährleistet.“

muss es heißen:

„(4)   Die tatsächliche Bestimmung der Flächengröße im Rahmen einer Vor-Ort-Kontrolle kann jedoch auf eine Stichprobe von mindestens 50 % der Flächen begrenzt werden, sofern die Stichprobe ein verlässliches und repräsentatives Kontrollniveau sowohl in Bezug auf die kontrollierte Fläche als auch in Bezug auf die beantragte Beihilfe gewährleistet.“

---
Exhibit 35.1



|     |                        |                              
|---- | ---------------------- | -----------------------------
|LOGO |                        | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
|     | D1086-120, 12th Floor 
|     | 550 South Tryon Street
|     | Charlotte, NC 28202   
|     | 1-800-326-1334        

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial
Mortgages Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-GC8 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial
Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been
made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

HANSEN MEDICAL, INC.  

May 12, 2014 
 Will Sutton 

Dear Will: 
 Hansen Medical, Inc. (the
“Company”) is pleased to offer you the opportunity to earn an aggregate of $200,000 in cash retention bonuses. $50,000 will be earned on each of September 30, 2014, March 31, 2015, September 30, 2015 and
March 31, 2016 (each, a “Retention Date”), subject to your continuous employment with the Company through the applicable Retention Date. To the extent earned, each bonus will be paid in a lump sum with the Company’s next
regularly scheduled payroll following the applicable Retention Date. Each bonus will be reduced by applicable withholding taxes and other deductions required by law. 

Nothing in this letter alters in any way your at-will employment relationship with the Company and therefore, you and the Company continue to
have the right to terminate your employment with the Company at any time and for any reason, with or without cause. 
 If you have any
questions regarding this letter you may contact me. This letter constitutes the entire agreement between you and the Company regarding the bonuses described herein; provided, however, that this letter does not replace or modify the terms of
any other cash bonus opportunities for which you are eligible. Finally, this letter may only be modified in an express written agreement signed by you and a duly authorized officer of the Company. 







 
			
	Very truly yours,
	
	HANSEN MEDICAL, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher P. Lowe

		
	Title:	 	 /s/ Interim CEO



  

	
	Accepted and agreed to:
	
	 /s/ Will Sutton

	Will Sutton
	
	Dated: May 12, 2014


  
 2
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2015

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-3 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName:

Lionel AntunesTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2015




---

<for SEMT 2012-3>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated June 27,
2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#                                                     Ali  Abouimrane                                            

###                         Senior Scientist                    

## Contact

abouimranea@ornl.gov

## Bio

Dr Ali Abouimrane is a Senior Scientist at ORNL with over 23 years’ experience in lithium batteries, advanced materials, and electrochemical energy devices. Dr. Ali Abouimrane published more than 75 peer-reviewed scientific journal papers, 15 granted patents and around 10 patent applications in the areas of Materials, Energy Storage and Nanotechnology. Dr. Abouimrane received numerous awards, including best NRC-Canada employee award and R&D 100 award. 

## Professional Experience

Before joining ORNL, Dr. Ali Abouimrane was Sparkz inc. VP of Technology from 2021 to 2022. Before joining Sparkz inc, Dr. Abouimrane was a Principal Scientist at Qatar Foundation from 2015 to 2020 and a Materials Scientist at Argonne National Laboratory from 2008 to 2015.

## Education

                    - Ph.D., Physical Chemistry; Hassan II University, 2000; Casablanca, Morocco
                    - M.Sc., Physical Chemistry; Mohammed V University, 1993; Rabat, Morocco
                    - B.Sc., Chemistry; Hassan II University, 1992; Casablanca, Morocco

## Publications

##   Sodium Rich Vanadium Oxy-Fluorophosphate – Na3.2Ni0.2V1.8(PO4)2F2O – as Advanced Cathode for Sodium Ion Batteries

May, 2023

View All
# Find People

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
- …
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

## A-Z

        - A (425)
        - B (953)
        - C (821)
        - D (506)
        - E (208)
        - F (310)
        - G (600)
        - H (782)
        - I (74)
        - J (277)
        - K (456)
        - L (565)
        - M (937)
        - N (208)
        - O (155)
        - P (575)
        - Q (26)
        - R (551)
        - S (1093)
        - T (403)
        - U (38)
        - V (129)
        - W (627)
        - X (23)
        - Y (117)
        - Z (104)
[No. 35114.

Department Two.

July 6, 1961.]

#### Ethel Fleck, *Appellant,*v. Washington Athletic Club, Respondent.†

*Casey & Pruzan,*for appellant.

*Carl P. Zapp*and *Leo A. Anderson,*for respondent.

†

Reported in 363 P. (2d) 389.

Per Curiam.

By stipulation of both parties, through their respective counsel of record, the decision in *State ex rel. Witting v. Superior Court,*56 Wn. (2d) 117, 351 P. (2d) 409 (1960), is controlling on this appeal. This requires the reversal of the order of dismissal entered by the trial court. It is so ordered.