alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  TARGA RESOURCES PARTNERS LP
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation or organization)
    
    001-33303
(Commission
File Number)
    
    65-1295427
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 1000 Louisiana, Suite 4300
Houston, TX 77002
 (713) 584-1000
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement.




---



##### 



Item 3.02 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities.
  Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d) Exhibits
 ExhibitNumber
    
    DescriptionExhibit 2.1*
    
    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2007, by
and between Targa Resources Partners LP and Targa Resources
Holdings LP.Exhibit 99.1
    
    Targa Resources Partners LP Press Release dated September 20, 2007.
 
 *
    
    Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the registrant agrees to furnish
supplementally a copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the SEC upon request. SIGNATURES
  TARGA RESOURCES PARTNERS LPBy:
    Targa Resources GP LLCits general partner Dated: September 21, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Jeffrey J. McParlandJeffrey J. McParlandExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    DescriptionExhibit 2.1
    
    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of September 18, 2007, by
and between Targa Resources Partners LP and Targa Resources
Holdings LP.Exhibit 99.1
    
    Targa Resources Partners LP Press Release dated September 20, 2007.
 
 *
    
    Pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K, the registrant agrees to furnish supplementally a
copy of any omitted exhibit or schedule to the SEC upon request.
NO T R EC OM M EN DE D F OR F UL L- TEX T P UB LIC AT ION F ile Nam e: 08a0318n.06 F iled: Jun e 3, 2008 No. 06-6358 UN ITED STA TES C OU RT OF AP P EA LS F OR THE SI XT H C IR CU IT
CH RI STO L ASS I TE R, P laintif f-App ellant,
v. SHA RL EN E LASS I TE R, Defendan t-Appellee, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON AP P EA L FROM THE UN I TE D ST AT ES D I STR I CT COURT F OR

TH E E AST ERN DI STRI CT OF KENTUCKY MEMORAN DUM OP IN ION

BEF ORE: NO RRIS, G IBBO NS a nd G RI F F IN , C ir c uitJudg e s. P ER CURIAM . Plaintiff sued his ex-wife claiming that her autobiog raphic al book def amed him. The alleg edly defa

matory portions of the book desc ribe two incide nts of phy sical assa ult by plaintiff ag ainst defe ndant, and an alleg ation that plaintiff committed adultery during their marr iag e. Af te r a be nc h tr ia l, t

he dis tr ic t c ourt

e nte re d ju dg me nt i n f

a vo r o f t he de fe nd ant. Pla int if

f a pp e a ls. As to the assault cla ims, the trial court found de fenda nt’s tes t i m o n y t h e more c redible,
c onclu di ng that sh e me t he r b ur de n o f p ro vin g the tr uth of the state me nts , a

c omp le te de fe ns e to de fa matio n. Turn ingits a tte nti on to the a du lte ry c la ims , th e c ourt fo un d th a t w hil e the de fe nd ant d id not succe ed in proving the truth of her statements, the adulter y alleg ations constituted defe ndant’s
o p i n i o nan d

w e r e n o ta c t i o n a

b l e . U n d e r K e n tu c ky l aw , an e x p r e s s i o n o f o p i n i o n c anb e d e f a m a t o r y,No. 06-6358

Lassit er v. Lassiter

- 2 - but is “actionable only

if it impl ies the alleg ation of undi sclosed defamatory fac ts as t he basis for the opinion.” Y

ancey v. Hamilton , 786 S.W .2d 854, 857 (Ky . 1989) (quoting Restatement (Sec ond) of Torts § 566 (1977))
. The court found t hat, in defe ndant’s book, she ex plained why she believe d that pla int if f c omm itt e d a du lte ry , in c lud ingthe fa c ts upo n whi c h he r opi nio n re ste d. Th e state me nts in the bo ok did no t im ply the e xiste nc e of

un dis c los e d d e fa

mator y fa c ts. Having car efully revie wed the book in c ontroversy , the rec ord below, and t h e b ri efs
su bmi tte d b y

the pa rt ie s, we are pe rs ua de d th a t th e dis tr ic t c ourt wa s n ot c lear ly

e rr on e ou s in

its
cre dibilit y -base d finding of fa ct re g ardingthe truth of the assault claims, and pr operly analy zed the adultery claims as non-a ctionable state ments of opinion. Rather than issue a detailed opinion, which would serve no useful purpose , we a dopt the rea soning of the district court set f

orth in its Opinion, fo un d at Lassit er v. Lassiter , 456 F. Supp. 2d 876 (E.D. K y . 2006). I n an alter native holding, the district c ourt noted that it would require a plaintiff to prove the falsity of def amatory statements by clea

r and convincing evidenc e before gr anting injunctive relief
. Since we f

ind no actionable de famatory statements, we ne ed not re ach this issue. Th e jud g me nt i s AF F IRMED.
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
301 South College Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28228-0166


RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2012:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as assigned and agreed to under the
servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing
Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted in Schedule B.


March 15, 2013

/s/ Julie Eichler
JULIE EICHLER
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,
Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2011-C5, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, as applicable.

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-C10, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, as applicable.

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-C6, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, as applicable.

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities,
Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C8, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, as applicable.

Pooling and Servicing Agreement for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc. Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2012-LC5, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, as applicable.


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.


(page)


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services
MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380


To: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Schedule B

Material Instances of Non-Compliance

No instances to report


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

April 19, 2023

No. 04-23-00032-CR

IN RE Javier Ovidio PEREZ

Original Proceeding1

ORDER

On January 12, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a 

motion for stay of the underlying proceedings pending final resolution of the petition for writ of 

mandamus, which this court granted in part on January 13, 2023. After considering the petition, 

real party in interest’s response, relator’s reply, and this record, this court concludes relator is not 

entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 52.8(a). The stay imposed on January 13, 2023 is LIFTED.

It is so ORDERED on April 19, 2023.

_____________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 19th day of April, 2023.

_____________________________

Michael A. Cruz, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 10850CR, styled State of Texas v. Javier Ovidio Perez, pending in the 

County Court, Kinney County, Texas, the Honorable Todd Alexander Blomerth presiding.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2860 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2860

                 For the relief of Sammie Martine Orr.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2000

   Mr. Enzi introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
                 For the relief of Sammie Martine Orr.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLASSIFICATION AS A CHILD UNDER THE IMMIGRATION AND 
              NATIONALITY ACT.

    (a) In General.--In the administration of the Immigration and 
Nationality Act, Sammie Martine Orr shall be classified as a child 
within the meaning of section 101(b)(1)(F) of such Act, upon approval 
of a petition filed on his behalf by the alien's adopting parents, 
citizens of the United States, pursuant to section 204 of such Act.
    (b) Limitation.--No natural parent, brother, or sister, if any, of 
Sammie Martine Orr shall, by virtue of such relationship, be accorded 
any right, privilege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality 
Act.
                                 <all>
```
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 2164

MICHAEL LEE HALL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Charlotte

. Robert J. Conrad, Jr. , District Judge. ( 3:16

- cv - 00715

- RJC

- DSC )

Submitted : December 21, 2017 Decided: December 27, 2017

Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

. Michael Lee Hall, Appellant Pro Se. Meredith Anne Pinson, Bruce Steen, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Michael Lee Hall appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant Bank of America Corporation’s motion to dismiss Hall’s civil claims, including his discriminatory failure

- to

- promote claim brought pursu ant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2017). Limiting our review to the issues raised in Hall’s informal brief, see 4th Cir. Rule 34(b), w e discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affir m the district
court ’s judgment

. See Hall v. Bank of Am. Corp. , No. 3:16

- cv - 00715

- RJC

- DSC ( W.D.N.C. Sept. 8 , 2017 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 23.A**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use of our reportdated February 26, 2007 in Amendment No. 1 to the Registration Statement (Form S-4) and Prospectusof Southern Natural Gas Company and Southern Natural Issuing Corporation for the registration of$500,000,000 in principal amount of 5.90% Notes due 2017./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPHouston, Texas
#### NEWTON v. STATE.

No. 18000.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 16, 1935.

Bryan Blalock, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for six years.

From the affidavit of the sheriff of Bas-trop county, filed in this court on September 17, 1935, it is made to appear that the appellant, having been transferred to the jail of said county to await the termination of his appeal, made his escape from said jail on August 29, 1935, and has neither returned nor been recaptured.

Under the terms of article 824, C% C. P., as amended by chapter 34, § 1, Acts of the Legislature 1933 (Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. art. 824), this court is deprived of jurisdiction of the appeal, and it is therefore dismissed.
NUMBER 13

- 14

- 00 446

- CV


### COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ DEAN SPRINGER AND IN TEGRITY FINANCIAL GROUP, INC

. , A ppellants ,

v.
LYDIA TUMMEL, ET. AL

. , A ppellees

.

____________________________________________________________

On a ppeal from the 3 32nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



### ORDER ABATING APPEAL

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Order Per Curiam

On August 20, 2014 , appellant, Dean Springer , filed a notice of bankruptcy in this
appeal. According to the notice, appellant filed a bankruptcy petition on June 3, 2014 , in
the United States Bankruptcy Co urt for the Central District of California

.2

Upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition, an automatic stay becomes effective which
prohibits the commencement or continuation of any judicial action or proceeding against
the debtor and any property within the debtor's bankruptcy estate. See 11 U.S.C.A. '
362(a). Pursuant to Rule 8.2 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, the appeal is
suspended. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 8.2.
Accordingly, this appeal is ABATED until further order of this Court. Any
documents filed subsequent to the bankruptcy petition will remain pending until the appeal
is reinstated. The parties are directed to take such action as is appropriate to advise the
Court of any change in the status of the bankruptcy proceeding which would affect the
status of this appeal, including but not limited to, the filing of a motion to reinstate pursuant
to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 8.3. See id. 8.3.

PER CURIAM

D elivered and filed the 2 9 th day of August , 20 14

.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3531 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to include claims relating to a 

response under the Comprehensive Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act among those claims for which the Federal Tort Claims Act provides 

a remedy, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 17, 2015 

Mr. WESTMORELAND introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to include claims 

relating to a response under the Comprehensive Response, Compensation, and Liability Act among those 

claims for which the Federal Tort Claims Act provides 

a remedy, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘No Exemptions for 

5 EPA Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3531 IH

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS EXCEPTION TO EXCEPTION 

2 FOR CERTAIN CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THE 

3 COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RE4 SPONSE, COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY 

5 ACT . 

6 Section 2680(a) of title 28, United States Code, is 

7 amended by inserting ‘‘(other than a discretionary func8 tion or duty in connection with a response under the Com9 prehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and 

10 Liability Act)’’ after ‘‘discretionary function or duty’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Order entered May 9, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00424-CV

IN RE JESSICA DIXON, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-18-19277

ORDER

Before Justices Schenck, Reichek, and Carlyle

It has come to our attention that relator filed for bankruptcy in the United 

States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Texas. Under 11 U.S.C.

§ 362, further action in this cause is automatically stayed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. 

Thus, for administrative purposes, we ABATE this cause. It may be 

reinstated on prompt motion by any party showing the stay has been lifted and 

specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 8.3. 

/s/ AMANDA L. REICHEK

JUSTICE
#### Mart E. McNamara *vs.*Ann M. MacLean.

Suffolk.

January 4, 1939.

February 28, 1939.

Present: Field, C.J., Donahue, Lummus, Qua, & Cox, JJ.

*Negligence,*Invited person, Store, Licensee, One owning or controlling real estate.

A customer of a store, who by permission of the proprietor was using a stairway to a toilet in the cellar which the proprietor had told him was maintained solely for use by employees, was no more than a licensee to whom the proprietor owed only a duty to refrain from wanton or reckless misconduct.

Tort. Writ in the Superior Court dated March 27, 1935.

The action was tried before *Walsh,*J.

*F. R. Walsh,*for the plaintiff.

*H. W. Hardy,*for the defendant.

Lummus, J.

The plaintiff entered the defendant’s store as an invited customer. While there, the plaintiff asked permission to use the toilet. The defendant gave permission, but said that the toilet was in the cellar and was for the use of employees. The defendant lifted a hatch cover or trap door that covered the steep narrow stairway, unlighted by any artificial light, that led to the cellar. Looking down, the plaintiff saw what she described as a dark hole. The defendant told the plaintiff to be careful in going down and to put her hand on the railing. The plaintiff, who had never seen the stairway before, started down, with her hand on the railing, but owing to the extreme narrowness of the steps, she lost her balance at the third step and fell down stairs. Upon evidence of the foregoing facts, the judge directed a verdict for the defendant, subject to the plaintiff’s exception.

Although the plaintiff was an invitee in the store, on the evidence she was a bare licensee on the stairway. *Cowen*v. *Kirby,*180 Mass. 504, 506. *Dickie*v. *Davis,*217 Mass. 25. *429
      *Davis*v. *Bean,*298 Mass. 135. *Rathgeber*v. *Kelley,*299 Mass. 444. *Urban*v. *Central Massachusetts Electric Co.*301 Mass. 519. The presence of the defendant, and her express permission to use the toilet, gave the plaintiff no higher standing. The case of *Jacobsen*v. *Simons,*217 Mass. 194, where a toilet was maintained for customers and they were invited to use it, is distinguishable. In the absence of wanton or reckless conduct, of which there is no allegation and no evidence, the plaintiff cannot recover.

*Exceptions overruled*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

# ACTION:

Request for public comments; correction.

# AGENCY:

Division of Federal Employees', Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Department of Labor (DOL) is correcting a notice that appeared in the                         **Federal Register**                         on September 4, 2024. The information provided in the                         **DATES**                         section contained an error. DOL is issuing this correction to provide the correct information.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In FR Doc 2024-19748 appearing at 89 FR 71935 in the                     **Federal Register**                     of September 4, 2024, on page 71935 in the 1st column, the following correction is made to the                     **DATES**                     section:                

The date is corrected to read as follows:

Consideration will be given to all written comments received by November 4, 2024.

Anjanette Suggs,

Certifying Officer.

[FR Doc. 2024-23728 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-CF-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ )

SAMUEL JEWLER

, et al

., )

)

Plaintiff s

, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 12

- 1843 (PLF)

)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

, et al

., )

)

Defendants. )

___________________________________ )

ORDER

For the reasons stated in the Court’s Memorandum Opinion issued this same day,

it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Judgment Pursuant to Rule 54(b) as

to Bank Defendants and Akridge Defendants [Dkt. 87] is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court’s June 21, 2016 Order [Dkt. 86] represents

its FINAL JUDGMENT regarding all claims against Bank of America, N.A. and Joseph Massey,

as well as the John Akridge Company, Phillip McGovern, Kathleen McKeon, and Judy Oakley.

This is a final appealable order. See F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(a).

SO ORDERED.

/s/

_________________________ PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

DATE: July 28, 2016 United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christian Mancillas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Rosca, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March
31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Rosca, Inc.


Date: May 12, 2008                      By: /s/ Christian Mancillas
                                           -------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Christian Mancillas
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer