alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 **Audit****Tax****Advisory********Grant Thornton LLP**201 South College Street Suite 2500 Charlotte, NC 28244 ******T** 704.632.3500 **F** 704.334.7701 www.GrantThornton.com**************Grant Thornton******Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Board of Directors  Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management'sCertification  Regarding  Compliance  with  Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  ("Management's Report"), that  Trimont  Real  Estate  Advisors,  Inc.  (the "Company") complied with the servicing  criteria  set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation B as of and forthe year ended December 31, 2014, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within Exhibit  A.  The  transactions  covered  by  this  report  are  only  those  transactions  processed  by  the Company  in  its  capacity as  trust,  senior  trust  or operating  advisor  for  the  asset  backed  securities transactions (the "Platform"). Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination.Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable  servicing criteria. Our  responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about theCompany's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Platform based  on  our examination. Our  examination  was  conducted  in  accordance  with  the  standards  of  the  Public  Company Accounting Oversight  Board (United States) and, accordingly,  included examining, on a test  basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the applicable  servicing  criteria  for  the  Platform and  performing  such  other  procedures  as  we  considered  necessary  in  the  circumstances.  Our examination  included  testing  selected  asset-backed  transactions  and  securities  constituting  the Platform  and  evaluating  whether  the  Company  performed  servicing  activities  related  to  those transactions  and  securities  in  compliance  with  the  applicable  servicing  criteria  for  the  period covered by this report. Accordingly, our testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by  this  report  and  that  may  have  affected  the  Company's servicing activities during the periodcovered  by  this  report.  We  believe  that  our  examination  provides  a  reasonable  basis  for  our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliancewith the applicable servicing criteria. 2 In our opinion, management's assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. complied with the applicable  servicing  criteria  identified  in  Exhibit  A  and  Exhibit  B  as  of  and  for  the  year  ended December 31, 2014 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.  Charlotte, North Carolina /s/ Grant Thornton LLP March 1, 2015
EXHIBIT
32





GETFUGU,
INC.





CERTIFICATION


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS
(a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,


UNITED
STATES CODE)





Pursuant
to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b)
of section 1350, chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of GetFugu, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with
respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of  1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
      23, 2009/s/ BERNARD STOLARPrincipal
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial
  Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1
  WRITTEN
STATEMENT
 PURSUANT
TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  In
connection with Quarterly Report of Lihua International, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, Jianhua Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:
      July 28, 2009
              By:
              /s/
      Jianhu ZhuName:    Jianhua
      ZhuTitle:     
      Chief Executive Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2287-053]

In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the J. Brodie Smith Hydroelectric Project, located on the Androscoggin River in Coos County, New Hampshire and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the project. No federal land is occupied by project works or located within the project boundary.

The FEA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a major federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

                    The Commission provides all interested persons with an opportunity to view and/or print the FEA via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (                    *http://www.ferc.gov/​*), using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field, to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    You may also register online at                     *https://ferconline.ferc.gov/​eSubscription.aspx*                     to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.                

                    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Ryan Hansen at (202) 502-8074 or                     *ryan.hansen@ferc.gov.*

Dated: October 8, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-23749 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

916 

KA 11-01410 

PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., CARNI, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ.

 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

DAVELL SCOTT, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

 

FRANK H. HISCOCK LEGAL AID SOCIETY, SYRACUSE (PIOTR BANASIAK OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

WILLIAM J. FITZPATRICK, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, SYRACUSE (MISHA A. COULSON

OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Onondaga County

(John J. Brunetti, A.J.), rendered May 16, 2011. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of criminal possession of a

controlled substance in the fifth degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him

upon a jury verdict of criminal possession of a controlled substance

in the fifth degree (Penal Law § 220.06 [5]). We reject defendant’s

contention that Supreme Court erred in refusing to charge the jury

with the lesser included offense of criminal possession of a

controlled substance in the seventh degree (§ 220.03). “A lesser

included offense may not be submitted unless there appears on the

whole record ‘some identifiable, rational basis’ for the jury to

reject evidence supportive of the greater crime yet accept so much of

the evidence as would establish the lesser” (People v Palmer, 216 AD2d

883, 884, lv denied 86 NY2d 799, quoting People v Scarborough, 49 NY2d

364, 369). Here, the People presented expert testimony that the

cocaine recovered from defendant weighed in excess of 1,400

milligrams, which is nearly triple the weight requirement for a

conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the

fifth degree (see § 220.06 [5]). Viewing the evidence in the light

most favorable to defendant (see People v Rivera, 23 NY3d 112, 120-

121, citing People v Martin, 59 NY2d 704, 705; People v Moultrie, 100

AD3d 401, 402, lv denied 20 NY3d 1102), we conclude that “[t]here was

no basis, other than sheer speculation, for the jury to find that the

chemist inaccurately weighed the drugs, or to otherwise reject the

portion of [her] testimony concerning the weight of the substance,

while at the same time accepting the portion of [her] testimony

identifying the substance” (People v Johnson, 66 AD3d 537, 538; see
-2- 916 

KA 11-01410 

Moultrie, 100 AD3d at 402; Palmer, 216 AD2d at 884). We therefore

conclude that there is no reasonable view of the evidence that

defendant committed the lesser offense but not the greater (see People

v Demus, 82 AD3d 1667, 1668, lv denied 17 NY3d 815; People v Bolden,

70 AD3d 1352, 1353, lv denied 14 NY3d 838).

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### Georgia E. Manell *vs.*S. S. Kresge Company.

January 6, 1939.

*T. B. Shea,*for the plaintiff.

*K. C. Parker,*for the defendant.

Exceptions overruled. The verdict for the defendant was directed rightly. The evidence did not warrant a finding of negligence on the part of the defendant, its officers, agents or servants. There was no error in the exclusion of evidence.
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-15-00183-CR

Christopher William Davis

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 432nd District Court

of Tarrant County (1381546D)

June 23, 2016

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill Meier 

 Justice Bill Meier
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
Stephen V, Williams, Chief Executive Officer of Winwheel Bullion, Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the period ended December 31,
2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d));
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:
April 2, 2010





By: /s/ Stephen V.
Williams


Chief
Executive Officer


(Principal
Executive Officer)
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
c/o Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
375 Park Avenue 2nd floor
J0127-023
New York, New York 10152-023


RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
    Securities Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-
    LC5

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012 (the
"Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank,
N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows
as of and for the year ending December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its
    performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's
    supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo
    has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
    respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 10, 2014


/s/ Brian Smith
BRIAN SMITH
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 July 2, 2019

s0624

Order 

Clerk

July 2, 2019

158543(67)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 158543

COA: 338058

Macomb CC: 2013-004546-FC

MATTHEW JAMES BLUMKE,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s March 5, 

2019 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

reconsideration of our previous order is warranted. MCR 7.311(G).
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1873

In re: JOSEPH D. KEMP , Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ( 1:19

- cv - 00080

- TSK

- MJA )

Submitted : March 31, 2022 Decided: April 13, 2022

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Joseph D. Kemp , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Joseph D. Kemp petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition

. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals
that , by order entered on December 28, 2021, the district court accepted the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and denied the petition

. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Kemp ’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional

process. PETITION DENIED
# L_2016282DE.01008401.xml

| 19.10.2016 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 282/84 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.10.2016

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 282/84

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1130/2011 der Kommission vom 11. November 2011 zur Änderung des Anhangs III der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1333/2008 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe im Hinblick auf eine Liste der Europäischen Union der für die Verwendung in Lebensmittelzusatzstoffen, Lebensmittelenzymen, Lebensmittelaromen und Nährstoffen zugelassenen Lebensmittelzusatzstoffe

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 295 vom 12. November 2011
  )

Seite 183, Teil 2:

Anstatt:

„Sorbinsäure — Sorbate (Teil 6 Tabelle 3)“

muss es heißen:

„Sorbinsäure — Sorbate (Teil 6 Tabelle 2)“

---
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, DC 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 Current Report
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 DATE OF REPORT (DATE OF EARLIEST EVENT REPORTED):
August 20, 2007
 
 PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.
  DELAWARE
(State of Incorporation)
    
    72-1440714
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)400 E. Kaliste Saloom Rd., Suite 6000Lafayette, Louisiana
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    70508
(Zip code)
    o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))
   1




---



##### 



Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure
 th
  Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
  99.1
    
    August 2007 Presentation
 2




---



##### 



PETROQUEST ENERGY, INC.Date:  August 20, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Daniel G. FourneratDaniel G. FourneratExecutive Vice President,
General           Counsel and
Secretary 3




---



##### 



ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    August 2007 Presentation
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Vortec Electronics, Inc. for the      quarter ended January 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the      quarter ended January 31, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects,      the financial condition and results of operations of Vortec Electronics,      Inc.. |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Melissa      Lopez                                                   |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Melissa      Lopez                                                             |
|  Title:    |  Principal      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  February      21, 2008                                                         |
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Plastron Acquisition Corp. II (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Rapp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael RappMichael
      Rapp
                Principal
      Financial Officer
                November 20,
      2009
United States         Office of  Personnel Management The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency    Retirement and Insurance Service 

Payroll Office Letter                                                     Number: P-00-10 Date: August 3, 2000    SUBJECT:  ENROLLMENT OPPORTUNITY FOR CERTAIN HEALTH ALLIANCE 

BENEFIT PLAN (CODE FX) ENROLLEES  The Health Alliance Benefit Plan (Code FX) will lose most of its primary providers in the Quincy (western Illinois) and Peoria (central Illinois) service areas.  OPM, therefore, is authorizing an opportunity for affected Health Alliance Benefit Plan enrollees to change their FEHB enrollments.   QUINCY SERVICE AREA  As of August 31, 2000, coverage in the Quincy service area will no longer be offered through the Health Alliance Benefit Plan for the following counties:  Adams, Brown, Pike and Schyler.  Note that enrollees residing in Hancock County (also located in the Quincy service area) will not be affected.   The opportunity to change FEHB enrollment for those covered by Quincy service area will begin immediately and continue through the last day of the pay period that includes  August 26, 2000.  The effective date of all enrollment changes will be the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after August 27, 2000.     PEORIA SERVICE AREA  As of December 31, 2000, FEHB coverage in the Peoria service area will no longer be offered through the Health Alliance Benefit Plan for the following counties:  Fulton, Henry, Knox, Marshall, Peoria, Putnam, Stark, Tazewell, Warren and Woodford.    The opportunity to change FEHB enrollment for those covered by the Peoria service area will begin immediately and continue through the last day of the pay period that includes  September 23, 2000.  The effective date of all enrollment changes will be the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after September 24, 2000.     If enrollees approach you with questions about whether they are affected by this matter, please have them call the Health Alliance Benefit Plan at 1-800-851-3379.  If you have any questions, please contact us via email at finance@opm.gov  or on (202) 606-0666.  

              Robert A. Yuran, Chief       Financial Policy Staff       Retirement and Insurance Service