alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Slip Op. 20– 172 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

__________________________________________ : WILMAR TRADING PTE LTD., : PT WILMAR BIOENERGI INDONESIA, and : WILMAR OLEO NORTH AMERICA LLC, : : Plaintiffs, : : and : : GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF : Before: Richard K. Eaton, Judge INDONESIA and P.T. MUSIM MAS, : : Consol. Court No. 18-00006 Consolidated Plaintiffs, : : v. : : UNITED STATES, : : Defendant, : : and : : NATIONAL BIODIESEL BOARD FAIR : TRADE COALITION, : : Defendant-Intervenor. : __________________________________________: JUDGMENT Before the court is the United States Depa rtment of Commerce’s (“Commerce” or the “Department”) remand redetermination (“Remand Results”), ECF No. 77, issued pursuant to the court’s order in Wilmar Trading PTE Ltd. v. United States , 44 CIT __, Slip Op. 20-115 (Aug. 11, 2020). In Wilmar , the court directed Commerce to recalc ulate its subsidy determination of goods provided for less than adequa te remuneration for one of th e Indonesian tax programs underConsol. Court No. 18-00006 Page 2 investigation: Commerce shall make a new subsidy dete rmination as to the 1994 Export Tariff that is supported by substantial evidence and in accordance with law; or, in the alternative, recalculate its ad valorem subsidy rate for goods provided for less than adequate remuneration, excluding any clai med effects of the 1994 Export Tariff. Wilmar , 44 CIT at __, Slip. Op. 20-115 at 40. In response, Commerce issued the Remand Results, stating that it did not undertake any separate or additional subsidy rate calculations pursuant to the 1994 export tariff for either Musim Mas or Wilmar. Upon remand, Commerce now also determines that th e entire benefit from the pr ovision of cheap [cheap crude palm oil] is attributable to the 2015 export levy. Therefore, Commerce finds that no adjustment to the ad valorem rate is necessary in order to comply with the Court’s order. Remand Results at 3. In other words, the Depart ment found that it did not need to make an adjustment to the ad valorem rate to comply with the court’s order in Wilmar , because its subsidy calculation for goods provided for less than adeq uate remuneration was based solely on the 2015 export levy. The court finds that Commerce has complied with its instruction in Wilmar because the Department determined that its ad valorem rate for crude palm oil provided for less than adequate remuneration excluded any claimed e ffects of the 1994 export tariff. No party contests the Remand Results. See Def.’s Request to Sust ain Remand Results, ECF No. 80. There being no further dispute in this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the Remand Results are sustained. /s/ Richard K. Eaton Richard K. Eaton, Judge Dated: December 1 , 2020 New York, New York
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-6 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: U.S. Bank National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

September 20, 2013
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): October 15, 2007
 TRANSOCEAN INC.
  Cayman Islands
    
    333-75899
    
    66-0582307(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 4 Greenway Plaza
Houston, Texas 77046
 (713) 232-7500
  
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
     Item 8.01. Other Events.
  Applied Drilling Technology, Inc.
  Merger Integration
  Accounting
  - 1 -




---



##### 



Forward-Looking Statements
  - 2 -




---



##### 



TRANSOCEAN INC.Date:  October 17, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Chipman EarleChipman EarleAssociate General Counsel and Corporate
Secretary
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 

1585 Broadway

Attn: Mortgage Backed Securities

New York, New York 10036

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C6,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C6

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

March 1, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| 1.   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the      dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company      for the periods presented. |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/Kelly      Sundberg                                                   |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:           | Kelly      Sundberg                                                                  |
|  Title:    |  Principal      Executive Officer,Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  November      13, 2009                                                         |
The petition satisfies the requirements of SCR 98(5).

Accordingly, we approve attorney Cheryl L. Johnson's resignation. SCR 98(5)(a)(2). The petition is hereby granted.

It is so ORDERED.

J.
J. Gibbons 

## M \ e// Pickering 

## dee-tet ‘ J. Hardesty

, J. Parraguirre

LA-9 , 

## geS Douglas

Saitta cc: David A. Clark, Bar Counsel Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Cheryl L. Johnson Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA (0) 1947A cep
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Nicole Anasenes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Infor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 22, 2014 |  | /s/ NICOLE ANASENES    
|                      |  | Nicole Anasenes        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-7573
(Commission File Number)
    
    73-0618660
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)1401 Enclave Parkway, Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77077
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    
    
    77077
(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: (281) 406-2000
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.04
    
    Triggering Events that Accelerate or Increase a Direct Financial
Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement
   Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Notice of Redemption dated August 17, 2007.
   PARKER DRILLING COMPANYDated:  August 17, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Ronald C. PotterRonald C. PotterVice President




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Notice of Redemption dated August 17, 2007.
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Bruce L. Bisson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Torch Energy RoyaltyTrust, for which Wilmington Trust Company acts as Trustee;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or for causingsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for theregistrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based upon such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves persons who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent I considerreasonable on information provided to me by Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated.       Date: August 14, 2007 By: /s/ Bruce L. Bisson     Bruce L. BissonVice PresidentWilmington Trust Company
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 276 Referred in House (RFH)]

  2d Session
                                 S. 276

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 27, 2000

               Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
                    For the relief of Sergio Lozano.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SERGIO LOZANO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Sergio Lozano shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Sergio Lozano enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Sergio Lozano, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.

            Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                    GARY SISCO,

                                                             Secretary.
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3671 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 3-year recovery 

period for all race horses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2015 

Mr. BARR introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a 

3-year recovery period for all race horses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Race Horse Cost Re5 covery Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. THREE-YEAR DEPRECIATION FOR RACE HORSES. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 168(e)(3)(A)(i) of the In8 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended to read as fol9 lows: 

10 ‘‘(i) any race horse,’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3671 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

2 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

3 December 31, 2014. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81530]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23212]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS


Updated OGE Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of a member to the 
OGE Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board.

DATES: Applicable date: October 8, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shelley K. Finlayson, Acting Director, 
Chief of Staff, and Program Counsel, Office of Government Ethics, 250 E 
Street SW, Suite 750, Washington, DC 20024; Telephone: 202-482-9300; 
TYY: 800-877-8339; FAX: 202-482-9237.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Federal law at 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management at 5 CFR part 430, subpart C and 
Sec.  430.310 thereof in particular, one or more Senior Executive 
Service performance review boards. As a small executive branch agency, 
OGE has just one board. In order to ensure an adequate level of 
staffing and to avoid a constant series of recusals, the designated 
members of OGE's SES Performance Review Board are being drawn, as in 
the past, in large measure from the ranks of other executive branch 
agencies. The board shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of 
each OGE senior executive's performance by their supervisor, along with 
any recommendations in each instance to the appointing authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive. This notice 
updates the membership of OGE's SES Performance Review Board as it was 
most recently published at 88 FR 75591 (Nov. 3, 2023).
    The following official has been appointed to the SES Performance 
Review Board of the Office of Government Ethics: Danae M. Serrano, 
Ethics Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission. The remaining Board 
members are Sean Dent, Senior Deputy General Counsel, Federal Housing 
Finance Agency, and Peter J. Constantine, ADAEO, Office of the General 
Counsel, Department of Transportation.

    Approved: October 2, 2024.
Shelley K. Finlayson,
Acting Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics.
[FR Doc. 2024-23212 Filed 10-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6345-02-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 16

- 11787 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CHAYCE DANIEL HODGES, also known as Staks , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:16

- CR

- 132

- 6

Before WIENER, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Chayce Daniel Hodges has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Hodges has filed a response. The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of Hodges ’s claims of ine ffective assistance of counsel; we therefore decline to consider the claims without

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 8, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 16-11787 Document: 00514342051 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/08/2018No. 16

- 11787

2 prejudice to collateral review. See United States v. Isgar , 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir. 2014 )

. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Hodges ’s response. We concur with counsel’s

assess ment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See
5 TH C IR

. R . 42.2. Hodges’s moti on for appointment of counsel is DENIED. Case: 16-11787 Document: 00514342051 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/08/2018
# L_2013009DE.01001401.xml

| 15.1.2013 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 9/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2013

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 9/14

---

Berichtigung der Empfehlung 2011/696/EU der Kommission vom 18. Oktober 2011 zur Definition von Nanomaterialien

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 275 vom 20. Oktober 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 275 vom 20. Oktober 2011

Seite 40, Nummer 4 Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

„ ‚Agglomerat‘ ist eine Ansammlung schwach gebundener Partikel oder Aggregate, in der die resultierende Oberfläche ähnlich der Summe der Oberflächen der einzelnen Bestandteile ist;“

muss es heißen:

„ ‚Agglomerat‘ ist eine Ansammlung schwach gebundener Partikel oder Aggregate, in der die resultierende externe Oberfläche ähnlich der Summe der Oberflächen der einzelnen Bestandteile ist;“.

---