alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT B- MONTHLY MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR LOG 

Aeroflite, Inc pilot/operators' will be using logbooks: logging all PIC time, successful takeoffs and landings, 

flight simulator time, recorded by type, make and model. 

Aeroflite, Inc will be using UAS log books for each type, make and model UAS with accompanying FAA 

registration Number: logging all UAS operator time, successful takeoffs and landings, maintenance and repair 

records, insurance coverage, software and hardware upgrades, pre-flight inspection checks, etc. 

Aeroflite, Inc will be using maintenance and repair logbook for each UAS in operation, the following is an 

example of the minimum logged information: 

Aircraft: 

N-Number: 

Hours: 

FLIGHT LOG 

UAS FLIGHT LOCATION I BATTERYID 

DATE MAKE/MODEL TIME NOTES 

FAAREG.# T.O.'s LDG'S PURPOSE 

MAINTENANCE LOG 

Date Issue Date Issue Issue Description/ Repair/Maintenance 

Discovered Resolved Maintenance Conducted Performed By 

Airframe 

Motors 

Propellers 

Flight Control Update 

Gimbal 

Misc. 

25
'* ~~ 

Devany, Dennis (OSP 

From: Virginia Brady [ginnybrady@mac.com] 


Sent: 
 '."! Saturday, February 13, 2010 11: 19 AM -~'To!·": Devany, Dennis (OST) 


Subject: Essential Air Service for Clinton County, NY 


.....- ,'.... ~ '" 

!{§!ll ,yvriting in support of Cape Air continuing to serve as the essential air service provider for Clinton County, NY for the 

nexnwO years: 'Recently the Clinton County legislature voted to recommend that this contract be given to Colgan Air 

instead of Cape Air. This recommendation does not significantly improve the service we have througJ:lCape Air. Cape Air 

.' currently provides safe, daily flights to Boston, MA at an affordable price. Under Colgan Air, the number of flights would 

decrease and the price would go up for those flying out of Clinton County Airport. Some argue that the larger planes whicn 

Colgan Air promises will attract additional Canadian bUsiness to Clinton County. It seems to me that tax payer subsidies 

provided by the DOT for Essential AirService should benefit the residents of Clinton County and the surrounding 

counties in NYS rather than foreign nationals who choose to use our airport. 

Thank you for your consideration. 


Virginia Brady 


28 Macomb St. 


Plattsburgh, NY 


1
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report
November 20, 2007  (Date of earliest event reported)
 Torch Energy Royalty Trust
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    1-1247
    
    74-6411424(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
    
    
    
    Identification Number)
 Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19890  (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 302/636-6016  (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits




---



##### 



TORCH ENERGY ROYALTY TRUSTBy: Wilmington Trust Company, not in itsindividual capacity but solely as Trustee forthe TrustDate: November 20, 2007
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Kristin L. MooreKristin L. MooreSenior Financial
Services Officer(The Trust has no employees, directors or executiveofficers.)




---



##### 



Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Torch Energy Royalty Trust Press
Release dated November 20, 2007 (furnished not filed).
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”), effective as of August 1, 2010, and amended on
October 1, 2010 and May 26, 2011, by and between Ampio Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and Vaughan Clift, M.D. (the “Executive”) is made as of August 11, 2014 (“Amendment
Date”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive (together the “Parties”) entered into the Employment
Agreement; 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to extend the term of the Employment Agreement through
July 31, 2015; and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties have agreed to modify the Employment Agreement. 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties agree as follows: 

1. The first sentence of Section 1 of the Employment Agreement shall be replaced in its entirety with the following sentence: 

“The Company hereby agrees to employ Employee and Employee hereby accepts such employment with the Company for the period of 60 months
beginning on the Effective Date.” 
 2. All other provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 

3. In connection with the Amendment and subject to the approval of the Compensation Committee of the Company, the Company hereby agrees to
grant to the Executive an option to purchase 170,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, 85,000 shares of which will vest on the date of grant and 85,000 shares of which will vest on July 31, 2015. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereby have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Date written above. 

 

			
	AMPIO PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Philip H. Coelho

	Its:	 	Chairman of the Compensation Committee
	
	VAUGHAN CLIFT, M.D.
	
	 /s/ Vaughan Clift

	Vaughan Clift, M.D.
# L_2011245EN.01002201.xml

| 22.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 245/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 245/22

---

Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EU) No 878/2011 of 2 September 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 442/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Syria

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 228 of 3 September 2011
  )

On page 4, Annex I, the following introductory text shall be added after the title:

‘The following shall be added to the list of natural and legal persons, entities or bodies in Annex II to Regulation (EU) No 442/2011:’.

---
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
 
 More Than a Compressor Company
 Press Information
 Houston, August 17, 2007
 Hanover Compressor Company Announces Redemption of $383 Million
of Senior Secured Notes Issued by Hanover Equipment Trust 2001A and
Hanover Equipment Trust 2001B
      12001 North Houston Rosslyn, Houston, Texas 77086
(281) 447-8787www.hanover-co.com




---



##### 



About Hanover Compressor Company
  Forward-Looking Statements




---



##### 



Investor Relations Inquiries:
 Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 Vice President, Investor Relations and Technology
Page | 1

MIDDLESEX COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS 

City Code City

250005017 ACTON

250031017 ASHBY

250036017 ASHLAND

250037017 ARLINGTON

250060017 AYER

250090017 BEDFORD

250095017 BELMONT

250105017 BILLERICA

250124017 BOXBOROUGH

250157017 BURLINGTON

250170017 CAMBRIDGE

250182017 CARLISLE

250195017 CHELMSFORD

250240017 CONCORD

250261017 DRACUT

250265017 DUNSTABLE

250291017 EAST PEPPERELL

250310017 EVERETT

250360017 FORGE VILLAGE

250365017 FORT DEVENS, AYER

250366017 FORT DEVENS, SHIRLEY

250375017 FRAMINGHAM

250425017 GLEASONDALE

250438017 GRANITEVILLE

250455017 GROTON

250478017 HANSCOM AFB

250490017 HOLLISTON

250520017 HOPKINTON

250535017 HUDSON

250615017 LEXINGTON

250616017 LAURENCE G HANSCM, LEXT

250617017 LINCOLN

250618017 LITTLETON

250620017 LAURENCE G HANSCM, BEDF

250621017 LAURENCE G HANSCM, CONC

250622017 LAURENCE G HANSCM, LINC

250630017 LOWELL

250660017 MALDEN

250680017 MARLBOROUGH

250700017 MAYNARD

250720017 MEDFORD

250740017 MELROSE

250836017 NABNASSET
Page | 2

City Code City

250845017 NATICK

250870017 NEWTON

250897017 NORTH BILLERICA

250909017 NORTH CHELMSFORD

250919017 NORTH READING

250922017 NORTH WILMINGTON

250930017 NUTTING LAKE

251010017 PEPPERELL

251020017 PINEHURST

251065017 READING

251153017 SHERBORN

251158017 SHIRLEY

251160017 SHIRLEY CENTER

251180017 SILVER LAKE, TEWKSBURY

251181017 SILVER LAKE, WILMINGTN

251190017 SOMERVILLE

251193017 SOUTH ACTON

251272017 STOW

251275017 STONEHAM

251279017 SUDBURY

251282017 TEWKSBURY

251297017 TOWNSEND

251305017 TYNGSBORO

251335017 WAKEFIELD

251340017 WALTHAM

251375017 WATERTOWN

251377017 WAYLAND

251387017 WEST ACTON

251420017 WEST CONCORD

251431017 WESTFORD

251436017 WEST GROTON

251447017 WEST TOWNSEND

251448017 WESTON

251490017 WILMINGTON

251503017 WINCHESTER

251510017 WOBURN

251518017 WOODVILLE
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2721

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore the deduction

for lobbying expenses in connection with State legislation.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 2000

Mr. THOMAS (for himself, Mr. SHELBY, Mr. REID, Mr. BREAUX, and Mr.

CONRAD) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to restore

the deduction for lobbying expenses in connection with

State legislation.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. RESTORATION OF DEDUCTION FOR LOBBYING

4 EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH STATE LEG5 ISLATION.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (2) of section 162(e)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to denial

8 of deduction for certain lobbying and political activities)

9 is amended—
2

•S 2721 IS

1 (1) by inserting ‘‘any State legislature or’’ be2 fore ‘‘any local council’’ in the material preceding

3 subparagraph (A), and

4 (2) by striking ‘‘such council’’ in subparagraph

5 (B)(i) and inserting ‘‘such legislature, council,’’.

6 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The heading of para7 graph (2) of section 162(e) of such Code is amended by

8 inserting ‘‘STATE OR’’ before ‘‘LOCAL’’.

9 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

10 this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred after

11 the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-14-0564 SAT Date: 5/28/2014 Print Date: 9/30/2014

Related cases :

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1-2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: Ecotox: N o
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR- MM, E, L, S; SESNS-S; MUTA, N EURO, LIVER, DEVE, MALE REPRO (uncertain); AQUATOX
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-14-0564 FATE: Liquid with MP < 20 C (E) log Kow = 3.27 (E) S = 175 mg/L at 25 C (E) VP = 4.4E-2 torr at 25 C ( N OMO5)
H = 7.73E-7 (E) log Koc = 2.25 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.83 (E)log Fish BAF = 2.21 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via biodeg Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk Sorption to soils/sediments = moderate Volatilization half-life from a standard river = 1000 hrs Volatilization half-life from a standard lake = 460 da Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 3.0 hr via OH radical Atmospheric Oxidation Half-life = 82 hr via ozone PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = moderate

Health : Health Summary: Absorbed all routes (analog). Concern for irritation to mucous membranes, eyes, lungs, and skin; dermal sensitization and; mutagenicity ( p ositive in several assays) based on ; liver toxicity based on ; solvent neurotoxicity; developmental toxicity based on the mutagenicity concerns. Uncertain concern for male reproductive toxicity based on . Test Data: N TP has concluded that there is no evidence of carcinogenic activity for based on the results of a 2-year feed study in rats

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 0.9-1.7 daphnid 48-h LC50 0.28-7.17 green algal 96-h EC50 1.2 fish

_ chronic value 0.09-0.17 daphnid

_ chronic value 0.014

algal

_ chronic value 0.2
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SAR nearest analog approach for SAR chemical class MW 134; log Kow = 3.3 (EPI); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 1

SARs SAR Class Ecotox Category N one
Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Doritza Pagan-Rodriguez
Table of Contents


EXHIBIT 32(i)


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
 
 I, Mark F. Furlong, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:
  (1.)
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Marshall & Ilsley Corporation (the “Company”) for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (14 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and
  (2.)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated:  May 10, 2010
 
 /s/ Mark F. Furlong
 ___________________________________
 Mark F. Furlong
 Chief Executive Officer
 Marshall & Ilsley Corporation
  This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed filed by Marshall & Ilsley Corporation for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
   87
#### State ex rel. Ignasiak, Respondent, vs. Town of Franklin and others, Appellants.

*November 11*

December 7, *1954.*

*296For the appellants there was a brief by *Clarence J. O'Brien,*town attorney, and *Gram & Wortley*and *Laurence C. Gram*of counsel, all of South Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Laurence C. Gram*and *Mr. O’Brien.*

*297For the respondent there was a brief by *Bernard N. Freud-enjeld,*attorney, and *Donald C. Jacobson*of counsel, both of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Mr. Freudenfeld.*

Gehl, J.

From the record and briefs it appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with the terms of the judgment. That fact of itself does not make him a contemnor. Not every failure to obey a judgment constitutes contempt of court. For instance, inability of the alleged contemnor to obey a decree, if not brought upon himself, may be a defense to a charge for contempt.

“It is true that the remedy is severe and harsh. Imprisonment certainly should not be ordered when it appears that the default is the result of honest inability to pay, on account of business misfortunes, or lack of health or earning ability, or other circumstances which are not the fault of defendant.” *Staples v. Staples,*87 Wis. 592, 596, 58 N. W. 1036.

There is no bill of exceptions. In the absence thereof this court is limited in its review to ascertain whether the judgment is sustained by the pleadings and findings. *Parke, Austin & Lipscomb, Inc., v. Sexauer,*204 Wis. 415, 235 N. W. 785. The trial judge made no formal findings but filed a memorandum opinion in which he stated as is set forth in the foregoing statement of facts. The opinion must be taken as declaring a judicial finding that defendant has failed to establish facts constituting contempt. *Will of Britt,*174 Wis. 145, 182 N. W. 738. We may not disturb the finding.

The town complains that the court erred in refusing to modify the judgment by providing therein “that plaintiff have some short period of time to finally comply with the original judgment.” There is no need for such modification. The judgment by its own terms directs that the nuisance be abated within ninety days from its date. As matters now stand plain*298tiff’s refusal or failure to comply does or does not constitute contempt of court, depending upon the facts occurring after the date of the judgment. That plaintiff has been acquitted of contempt in the instant proceeding does not prevent the town from acting again and at any time at which it might appear to its officials that plaintiff has contumaciously failed to comply with the terms of the judgment. In other words, the town has not been aggrieved by the court’s refusal to modify the judgment as it requested.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
osha.gov/worker

Usted tiene el derecho a:

• Un lugar de trabajo seguro y saludable.

• Protección contra peligros.

• Denunciar condiciones de trabajo peligrosas.

Llame al 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) 

o visite osha.gov/worker.

Recomendaciones para mantenerse seguro:

• Practique el distanciamiento social cuando

sea posible.

• Use una cubierta facial de tela y guantes.

• Lávese las manos con frecuencia con jabón

y agua y use un desinfectante de manos.

• Evite compartir herramientas, de ser posible.

• Desinfecte las herramientas antes y después

de cada uso por parte de otra persona.

Denuncie cualquier condición 

de trabajo insegura. Es confidencial.

Si le preocupa su 

seguridad y salud durante 

la pandemia del virus 

COVID-19, OSHA le 

puede ayudar.

Dada la naturaleza evolutiva de la pandemia, OSHA está en proceso de revisar y actualizar este documento. Es posible que estos materiales ya no 

representen las recomendaciones y guías actuales de OSHA. Para obtener la información más actualizada, consulte la Guía de protección de los trabajadores.
#### FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. OF NEW YORK v. REYNOLDS.

No. 3497.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Feb. 4, 1937.

Daniel & Edwards, of Victoria, for appellant.

Cullen B. Vance, of Edna, and Russel A. Bonham, of Houston, for appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

Due notice of the submission of this case was given to counsel, but no briefs have been filed by the appellant or appellee. The court, therefore, sua sponte, dismisses this appeal. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.(2d) 811.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2056
HENRY T. SANDERS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus STATE OF MARYLAND; MARYLAND STATE TREASURER, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, District Judge. (CA97-1691-PJM) Submitted: May 14, 1998 Decided: May 21, 1998 Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Henry T. Sanders, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Laura C. McWeeney, Margaret Witherup Tindall, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's orders dismissing hisaction. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Sanders v. Maryland , No. CA-97-1691-PJM (D. Md. June 18 and July 15, 1997). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ex-10.3

 EXHIBIT 10.3
 

 KEY LINK ASSETS CORP.
 NOTE PAYABLE
 $340
 

 

 May 23, 2014
 Chicago, Illinois
 

 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned, Key Link Assets Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to the order of Shawn Clark, together with any successors or assigns (collectively, the "Holder"), the principal sum of Three-Hundred-Forty Dollars (US $340). The Note is non-interest bearing and bears no collateral.
 

 The Note will be paid in full on June 30, 2016. The Company may redeem the Note in part, or in full, prior to the due date of the Note.
 

 Payments of principal shall be made at the place that Holder from time to time shall direct in writing, or, in the absence of direction, at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661.
 

 Upon a default by the undersigned to make any payment due hereunder, and continuing for five (5) calendar days after notice has been given to the undersigned, and at the option of the Holder, all of the unpaid indebtedness evidenced by this Note shall become immediately due and payable and shall accrue interest at the highest rate of interest then permitted by law.
 

 This Note is submitted by the undersigned to the Holder in Chicago, Illinois and shall be deemed to have been made thereat. This Note shall be governed and controlled by the laws of the State of Illinois as to interpretation, enforcement, validity, construction, effect, choice of law, and in all other respects.
 

 To induce the Holder to accept this Note, the undersigned irrevocably agrees that, subject to the Holder's sole and absolute election, all actions and proceedings in any way, manner or respect arising out of or from or related to this Note shall be litigated in courts having situs within the County of Cook, State of Ilinois, the undersigned hereby covenants and submits to the jurisdiction of any local, state or federal court located within said county and state.
 

 Any notice, designation, demand, consent or request required herein to be given or to be served upon the undersigned by the Holder shall be deemed to have been given or served upon mailing, if addressed to the undersigned at 216 South Jefferson Street, Suite LL, Chicago, Illinois 60661, or upon actual receipt by the undersigned.
  
 In the event of default hereunder, the undersigned agrees to pay all expenses, including, without limitation, attorney fees, incurred by the Holder in endeavoring to enforce the rights of Holder hereunder.
 

 Key Link Assets Corp.
 

 

 By: /s/ Shawn Clark
       Shawn Clark, Chief Executive Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

June 26, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice 133091 & (69) (74) Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133091 COA: 263153 Kent CC: 04-004423-FH LOUIS ANTHONY WILBON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 28, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for immediate consideration and th e motion to remand are DENIED.

s0618 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 26, 2007

Clerk
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
(Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Dated: May 3, 2007/s/ Quinn J. HébertQuinn J. HébertPresident andChief Executive Officer/s/ G. Kregg LunsfordG. Kregg LunsfordExecutive Vice Presidentand Chief Financial Officer