**Exhibit 34.8**

<LOGO> 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

To the Board of Governors 

NorthMarq Capital, LLC 

Bloomington, Minnesota 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of 2013 Compliance by NorthMarq Capital, LLCWith Regulation AB Servicing Criteria (Management’s Assertion), that NorthMarq Capital, LLC (NorthMarq or the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC)Regulation AB for services by the Company that are encompassed by contractual obligations to perform Regulation AB reporting (the Platform), including only those asset-backed securities transactions defined below, as of and for the year endedDecember 31, 2013, excluding the following criteria set forth in Items 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)C and D, 1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vii) and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which management has determined are notapplicable to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform. Appendix A to Management’s Assertion identifies the individual asset-backed transactions defined by management as constituting the Platform. Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted bythe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria, including tests on a sample basis of theservicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Company performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria during the specified period, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our procedures were limited to selected servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report and, accordingly, such samples may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backedtransaction in the Platform. Further, an examination is not designed to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to the period specified above that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by theCompany during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

As described in Management’s Assertion, for servicing criterion 1122(d)(2)(i) and 1122(d)(1)(ii), theCompany has engaged vendors to perform certain activities required by these servicing criteria. The Company has determined that these vendors are not considered “servicers” as defined in Item 1101(j) of Regulation AB, and the Companyhas elected to take responsibility for assessing compliance with the servicing criterion applicable to these vendors as permitted by Interpretation 17.06 of the SEC Division of Corporation Finance Manual of Publicly Available TelephoneInterpretations (Interpretation 17.06). As permitted by Interpretation 17.06, the Company has asserted that it has policies and procedures in place designed to provide reasonable assurance that the vendor’s activities comply in all materialrespects with the servicing criterion applicable to these vendors. The Company is solely responsible for determining that it meets the SEC requirements to apply Interpretation 17.06 for the vendors and related criterion as described in itsassertion, and we performed no procedures with respect to the Company’s determination of its eligibility to use Interpretation 17.06. 

In ouropinion, Management’s Assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ McGladrey LLP 

Minneapolis, Minnesota 

February 10, 2014 

 
2