alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 11, 2010 

y0303 

Order 

 

March 11, 2010 

139628 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139628 

 COA: 289375 

Alger CC: 06-001740-FC 

DONALD JAMES GATISS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 29, 2009 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered. We DIRECT the Alger County Prosecuting 

Attorney to answer the application for leave to appeal within 28 days after the date of this 

order. The prosecutor shall specifically address: (1) whether the circuit court’s 

December 13, 2007 order effectively vacated the defendant’s motion for relief from 

judgment for nonconformity with the rules, adjudicated it under the rules of subchapter 

6.500, or attempted to do both; (2) whether the circuit court’s attempt to dismiss the 

motion, in toto, on procedural grounds, strike it under MCR 2.115(B), and 

simultaneously deny it under the rules of subchapter 6.500 was proper, after having 

accepted the motion under MCR 6.502(D); (3) whether the circuit court adequately 

articulated its reasons for finding all of the defendant’s issues totally lacking in merit; (4) 

whether the circuit court adequately articulated its reasons for striking all of the 

defendant’s pleadings; and (5) the likely consequences for further post-judgment federal 

or state review if this Court permits the order to stand. 

The application for leave to appeal remains pending.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83052]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23661]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Consortium for Battery Innovation

    Notice is hereby given that, on October 1, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Consortium for Battery 
Innovation (``CBI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Shenxian Hua Yang Industry Co. Ltd., Liao Cheng, PEOPLE'S 
REPUBLIC OF CHINA; Camel Group Co. Ltd., Xiangyang, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC 
OF CHINA; and Luminous Power Technologies, Gurugram, INDIA, have been 
added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Boab Metals, Perth, AUSTRALIA; Digatron Power Electronics 
GmbH, Aachen, GERMANY; and NV Bekaert SA, Zwevegem, BELGIUM, have 
withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CBI intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 24, 2019, CBI filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 
2019 (84 FR 29241).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on March 18, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 28, 2024 (89 FR 54043).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-23661 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 31, 2007
 Pioneer Companies, Inc.
  Commission File Number 000-31230
 DELAWARE
    
    06-1215192(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (IRS EmployerIncorporation or organization)
    
    Identification No.)
 700 LOUISIANA, SUITE 4300, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (d)
    
    Exhibits
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description10.1
    
    
    First Supplemental Indenture dated August 31, 2007.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
   PIONEER COMPANIES, INC.By:
    /s/ George H. PainName:
    George H. PainTitle:
    Vice President and Secretary




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description10.1
    
    
    First Supplemental Indenture dated August 31, 2007.
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Homeowners Choice, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2009 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RICHARD R. ALLENRichard R. AllenChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2009


A signed original of this document has been provided to Homeowners Choice, Inc. and will be
retained by Homeowners Choice, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



43
Exhibit 4.22

 

12 August 2014

Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Ladies and Gentlemen:

 

We were previously principal accountants for Diageo plc and, under the date of July 30, 2013, we reported on the consolidated financial statements of Diageo plc as of and for the years ended June 30, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2013. On September 19, 2013, at Diageo plc’s annual general meeting, we declined to stand for re-election. We have read Diageo plc’s statements included under Item 16.F of its Form 20-F to be filed on August 12, 2014, and we agree with such statements.

 

 

Very truly yours,

/s/ KPMG Audit Plc
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of TC Power Management Corp. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended November 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"),
      I,
      Gordon W. Douglas, Chief
      Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary, Treasurer, and a Directorof the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
        signed
        original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
        to
        TC Power Management Corp., and will be retained by TC Power Management Corp.
        and
        furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
        request.


Dated
      this 23rd day of January, 2008.





/s/
      Gordon W.
      Douglas___


Gordon
      W.
      Douglas


Chief
        Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
 Secretary,
        Treasurer, and a
        Director
##### 



EXHIBIT 23.2
 Consent of T.J. Smith & Company, Inc.
  
  Yours very truly,
T. J. Smith & Company, Inc./s/ T. J. SmithBy T.J. Smith
****

 

|   | USBank(Logo)                                                                                            |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                    |
|   | GlobalCorporate Trust190 S. LaSalle Street, 7th Floor

MK-IL-SL7C

Chicago,IL 60603

 

usbank.com |

 

*VIA:EMAIL*

 

UBSCommercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.

1285Avenue of the Americas

NewYork, New York 10019

Attention:Nicholas G. Galeone

Email: nicholas.galeone@ubs.com

 

17g5informationprovider@usbank.com

 

**AnnualStatement of Compliance**

**UBS-BarclaysCommercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C4**

 

|  | Re: | ThePooling and Servicing Agreement(the “Agreement”) dated as of December 1, 2012 among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors LLC, as special servicer, Trimont Real EstateAdvisors, Inc., as operating advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agentand custodian |
|--|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

I,Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:

 

(1)A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”)and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement have been made under my supervision; and

 

(2)To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreementin all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.

 

Capitalizedterms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.

 

 

Date:February 23, 2020

  

| U.S.Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |   |   |
| By:                                                               | /s/                                                                                                                        Kimberly                                          O. Jacobs |   |
|                                                              | Kimberly                                       O. Jacobs |   |
|                                                              | Senior                                       Vice President |   |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23745]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL24-80-000; EL24-81-000; EL24-82-000; EL24-83-000]


Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., PJM 
Interconnection, L.L.C., Southwest Power Pool, Inc., ISO New England, 
Inc.; Notice of Extension of Time

    On September 30, 2024, Advanced Energy Economy, the American Clean 
Power Association, and the Solar Energy Industries Association 
(collectively, the Clean Energy Associations) filed a motion for a 14-
day extension of time--from October 11, 2024 to October 25, 2024--for 
interested entities to submit responses in the above-referenced 
proceedings.\1\ No answers were filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Midcontinent Indep. Sys. Operator, Inc., 187 FERC ] 61,170, 
at P 72 & ordering para. (E) (2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon consideration, notice is hereby given that an extension of 
time for interested entities to file responses in the above-referenced 
proceedings is granted to and including October 25, 2024.

    Dated: October 8, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-23745 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

HAROLD K. BELL,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MARYLAND STATE LOTTERY; TOM

SKARZYNSKI; CARROLL HYNSON;

WILLIAM W. SALTZMAN; ALFIE PENN; No. 97-2339

PAULA MOORE,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

CARROLL BENNETT,

Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Marvin J. Garbis, District Judge.

(CA-97-2793-MJG)

Submitted: May 19, 1998

Decided: September 4, 1998

Before WIDENER and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and

HALL, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

Corinne G. Rosen, NATIONAL LEGAL FOUNDATION, P.A.,

Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellant. J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Michelle N.
Levister, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Raymond F. Altman, Lynn Weinberg,

FREISHTAT & SANDLER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).

_________________________________________________________________

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Harold Bell, the president of H.B. Sports Promoting & Marketing,

Inc., filed a state law breach of contract claim on behalf of H.B.

Sports Promotion & Marketing, Inc. The district court dismissed the

claim without prejudice under a local rule which requires corporations

to be represented by an attorney. On appeal, Bell alleges that his complaint stated a valid breach of contract claim and thus the district court

erred in summarily dismissing the claim.

Rule 83 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes district

courts to make and amend rules, not inconsistent with the Federal

Rules of Civil Procedure, governing practices within the district court.

Local Rule 101.1.a for the District of Maryland prohibits a corporation from representing itself. See Jones v. Dacosta, 930 F. Supp. 223,

224 (D. Md. 1996). Bell does not challenge the validity of this rule,

and the rule is not inconsistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or any federal statute. See White v. Raymark Indus., Inc., 783

F.2d 1175, 1177-78 (4th Cir. 1986). Accordingly, we find no error in

the district court's dismissal of the breach of contract claim Bell filed

on behalf of H.B. Sports Promoting & Marketing, Inc. We deny counsel's motion to withdraw and dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 2
Post Of fice Box 12548, Austin, Texas 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • www.texasattor neygeneral.gov 

Kristofer S. Monson (512) 936-1820 

ASSISTANT SOLICITOR GENERAL KRISTOFER.MONSON@TEXASATTORNEYGENERAL.GOV

March 17, 2015 

Via File & ServeXpress 

Jeffrey D. Kyle 

Clerk 

Court of Appeals 

Third District of Texas 

P.O. Box 12547 

Austin, Texas 78711-2547 

 Re: Cause Number: 03-14-00501-CV 

 The County of La Salle 

 v. Joe Weber, in his Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Texas 

 Department of Transportation; The Texas Department of Transportation; 

 Ted Houghton, in his Official Capacity as Chairman of the 

 Texas Transportation Commission; et al.

Mr. Kyle: 

 I will present argument on behalf of the appellees. 

 

 Sincerely, 

 /s/ Kristofer S. Monson 

 Kristofer S. Monson 

 Assistant Solicitor General 

KSM\hld 

 

ACCEPTED

03-14-00501-CV

4530711

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

3/17/2015 2:11:02 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/17/2015 2:11:02 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk
Ms. Debbie RabinRegulations Coordinator, Air and Radiation Management Administration

Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washington Boulevard

Suite 730

Baltimore, MD 21230

STATE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEW PROCESS

State Application Identifier: MD20071213-1207Project Description: Proposed New Air Quality Regulations/amendments: to the Maryland State Implementation Plan: Public

Hearing on 1/23/2008

Project Location: Maryland

Clearinghouse Contact: Bob Rosenbush

Dear Ms. Rabin:

,— Thank you for submitting your project for intergovernmental review. Participation in the Maryland Intergovernmental Review and

( 2oordination(MIRC) process helps ensure project consistency with plans, programs, and objectives of State agencies and local

governments.

Notice of your application is being provided to State and local public officials through the I,iterovernmeizIa1 Monilor, which is a

weekly Internet publication identifying projects received by the State Clearinghouse for Intergovernmental Assistance. Thisdocument may be viewed at http://www.mdp.state.md.us/CLHOUSE/monitor_fyO4.htm. The project has been assigned a unique

State Application Identifier that should be used on all documents and correspondence.

All MIRC requirements have been met in accordance with Code of Maryland Regulations (COMAR 14.24.04) and this concludes

the review process for the above referenced project. If you need assistance or have questions, contact the State Clearinghouse staff

person noted above at 410-767-4490 or through e-mail at brosenbush@mdp.state.md.us. Thank you for your cooperation with

the MIRC process.

Sincerely, j/t7Linda C. Janey, J.D., Assistant Secretary

for Clearinghouse and Communications

LCJ:BR

cc: Kathleen Blinebury - EPA

07-!207.V.tI,VEJVdoc

301 West Preston Street • Suite 1101 • Baltimore. Ma 0/and21201-2305

Te/ephone:410.767.4500 •Fax:410.767.4480 eTa/I Free: 1.877.767.6272 e7TYUse-s:Maij/andRe/uy

Internet: www.A4DP.s/a/e.md. us
Exhibit 13.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer required by

Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Bryan Dulhunty, Chief Financial Officer of Benitec Biopharma Limited (the Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 20-F for the period ended June 30, 2016, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 13.1 (the Annual Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: October 28, 2016



/s/ Bryan DulhuntyBryan DulhuntyChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Form 20-F to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Benitec Biopharma Limited under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form
20-F), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ BORIS SVETLICHNYBoris SvetlichnySenior Vice-President,Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 10:12 AM

To: 'rayjobe@gmail.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Replicopy, Inc. FAA-2014-1030



### April 2, 2015

Mr. Raymond V. Jobe Counsel for Replicopy Inc. d/b/a/ RDM Productions Law Office of Raymond V. Jobe 8150 North Central Expressway, Suite. 747 Dallas, Texas 75206-1990

Dear Mr. Jobe:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2014-1030). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft makes, mode ls, and types (i.e. - fixed-wing, roto rcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The descriptions shou ld include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manuals.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by April 16, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov