alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Renegy Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
    5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small
business issuers auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
    By:
    /s/ Robert M. WorsleyName:
    Robert M. WorsleyTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
##### 



/s/ David M. McClanahanDavid M. McClanahanPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 8, 2007
EXHIBIT 31.4

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a)

I, Juan J. Román, certify that:



| | 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K/A of EVERTEC, Inc;
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date : March 20, 2014 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Juan J. Román      
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Juan J. Román          
|                      |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3345 

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act for purposes of making 

claims under such Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. GOSAR (for himself, Mrs. KIRKPATRICK, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. 

AMODEI, and Ms. SINEMA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 

Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 

by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 

within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act for 

purposes of making claims under such Act based on 

exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Downwinders Com5 pensation Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3345 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCLUSION UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE 

2 COMPENSATION ACT. 

3 Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Com4 pensation Act (42 U.S.C. 2210 note; Public Law 101– 

5 426) is amended— 

6 (1) in subparagraph (B)— 

7 (A) by striking ‘‘that portion of’’; and 

8 (B) by striking ‘‘that consists of townships 

9 13 through 16 at ranges 63 through 71’’; and 

10 (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ‘‘all acre11 age in any county all or part of which is located in’’ 

12 before ‘‘that part’’. 

13 SEC. 3. DENIAL OF CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR CON14 TRIBUTIONS THAT HAVE A PREREQUISITE 

15 FOR PURCHASING TICKETS TO A COLLEGE 

16 SPORTING EVENT. 

17 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 170(f) of the Internal 

18 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

19 the following: 

20 ‘‘(1) CONTRIBUTIONS THAT HAVE A PRE21 REQUISITE FOR PURCHASING TICKETS TO A COL22 LEGE SPORTING EVENT.—No deduction shall be al23 lowed under subsection (a) for any contribution that 

24 has a prerequisite for purchasing tickets to a college 

25 sporting event.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3345 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply to contributions made after the 

3 date of the enactment of this Act in taxable years ending 

4 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
VII

Private Calendar No. 21

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 276

[Report No. 106–958]

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 27, 2000

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be printed

AN ACT

For the relief of Sergio Lozano.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SERGIO

4 LOZANO.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Sergio Lozano shall be eligible for issuance of an im8 migrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an
2

•S 276 RH

1 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec2 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful

3 permanent resident.

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Sergio Lozano en5 ters the United States before the filing deadline specified

6 in subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered

7 and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be

8 eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the

9 Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the en10 actment of this Act.

11 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

12 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap13 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica14 tion for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

15 fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this

16 Act.

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Sergio Lozano, the Secretary of State shall in20 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur21 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im22 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

23 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

24 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

25 total number of immigrant visas that are made available
3

•S 276 RH

1 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

2 202(e) of such Act.

Passed the Senate November 19, 1999.
Private Calendar No. 21

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 276

[Report No. 106–958]

AN ACT

For the relief of Sergio Lozano.

OCTOBER 11, 2000

Referred to the Private Calendar and ordered to be

printed
# L_2011260EN.01001101.xml

| 5.10.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 260/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 260/11

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 986/2011

of 30 September 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications [Queso Casín (PDO)]

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Queso Casín’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Queso Casín’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 30 September 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 321, 26.11.2010, p. 13.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SPAIN

Queso Casín (PDO)

---
##### 



Exhibit 5.1
 
 Re:
    
    Registration on Form S-8 of 750,000 common units representinglimited partner interests of Quicksilver Gas Services LP
         Very truly yours,/s/ John C. CironeJohn C. CironeGeneral Counsel
Exhibit 4.9  EXISTING RCF ACCESSION LETTER  To: ING Bank N.V., London Branch as Facility Agent  From:Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.V.and Coca-Cola HBC AG.  Dated:22 July 2013  Dear Sirs  COCA-COLA HBC AG - 500,000,000 SYNDICATED MULTI-CURRENCY REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITY AGREEMENT  DATED 12 MAY 2011 (AS AMENDED, RESTATED AND SUPPLEMENTED FROM TIME TO TIME) (THE FACILITY AGREEMENT)  1.We refer to the Facility Agreement.  This is an Accession Letter.  Terms defined in the Facility Agreement have the same meaning in this Accession Letter unless given a different meaning in this Accession Letter.  2.Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.V.agrees to become an Additional Guarantor and to be bound by the terms of the Facility Agreement as an Additional Guarantor pursuant to Clause 24.4 (Additional Guarantors) of the Facility Agreement.Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.Vis a private company with limited liability duly incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands.  3.Coca-Cola HBC Holdings B.V.sadministrative details are as follows:  Address:Naritaweg 165, 1043 BW Amsterdam, the Netherlands  Fax No:+302106183275  Attention:Bart Jansen  4.This Accession Letter and any non-contractual obligations arising out of or in connection with it are governed by English law.  5.The courts of England have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute arising out of or in connection with this deed (including a dispute regarding the existence, validity or termination of this Accession Letter) (a Dispute). The parties to this Accession Letter agree that the courts of England are the most appropriate and convenient courts to settle Disputes and accordingly no Party will argue to the contrary. This paragraph 5 is for the benefit of the Finance Parties only.  As a result, no Finance Party shall be prevented from taking proceedings relating to a Dispute in any other courts with jurisdiction.  To the extent allowed by law, the Finance Parties may take concurrent proceedings in any number of jurisdictions.


6.This Accession Letter is entered into by deed.   EXECUTED AND DELIVERED AS A   DEED BY COCA-COLA HBC AG

EXECUTED AND DELIVERED AS A   DEED BY COCA-COLA HBC HOLDINGS B.V.By:
/s/ J. Gustavsson

By:
/s/ H. BalcarovaName:
J. Gustavsson

Name:
H. BalcarovaDirector ADate: 22 July 2013Date: 22 July 2013By:
/s/ M. Imellos

By:
/s/ B.H.O. JansenName:
M. Imellos

Name:
B.H.O. JansenDirector BDate: 22 July 2013Date: 22 July 2013
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6204 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6204

**Commission Decision of 06/05/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6204 - LINEA / DONALINK) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 6.5.2011

C(2011) 3217 final

PUBLIC VERSION

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

|To the notifying party: |

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6204 – LINEA / DONALINK Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 05/04/2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Linea Ltd ("Linea", Bermuda) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control over Donalink Limited ("Donalink", Cyprus) in which currently Linea, STI Limited ("STI", Jersey) and Altmirco Enterprises Limited ("Altmirco", Cyprus) are the shareholders. The only operating company that Linea controls (indirectly) is OJSC MCC Eurochem Russia Agrochemicals ("Eurochem", Russia). The only operating company that Donalink controls is Open Joint Stock Company Siberian Coal Energy Company ("SUEK", Russia) [2] .

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Linea: investment holding.

- for Eurochem: mining of minerals for fertilizers and the manufacture and sale of fertilizers.

- for Donalink: investment holding.

- for SUEK: coal mining activities in Russia, supply of coal to customers worldwide and power generation in Russia.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 117, 15/04/2011, p.22

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
***Exhibit 32.1***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the report on Form 10-Q/A of Abakan Inc., for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert Miller, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

 

(1)   This report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results of operations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: September 23, 2011

 

 

/s/ Robert H. Miller

Robert H. Miller, Chief Executive Officer

 

This certification accompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

 

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF SENIOR OFFICER IN CHARGE OF THE SERVICING

FUNCTION OF
THE SERVICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Kim Taylor, certify that:

1. I have
reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Huntington Auto Trust 2012-2 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review
conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing
agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities
and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank Trust
Company Americas.



|       |  |                                                                 
|------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|By:    |  | /s/ Kim Taylor                                                  
|Name:  |  | Kim Taylor                                                      
|Title: |  | Senior Vice President, The Huntington National Bank, as Servicer

Date: March 18, 2013
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 AMENDMENT NUMBER TWO
TO THE
UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN
           - 1 -




---



##### 



UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION HOLDINGS, INC.By:

/s/
Donald C. WayneName:
    Donald C. WayneTitle:
    Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary - 2 -
Exhibit 10.29_Amendment No. 2_Bonnett Employment Agreement






Exhibit 10.29






AMENDMENT NO. 2, dated as of August 1, 2005, 
to that Employment Agreement dated April 2, 2002 (the "Agreement") 
by and between David Bonnett (the "Executive") and 
AMERICAN MEDIA, INC. (the "Company").


Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:


1.    Paragraph 1 of the Employment Agreement Amendment is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:


The Employment Term shall be extended to December 31, 2006 on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Agreement.  Executive will be notified 90 days prior to the expiration of the Agreement of the Company's intent to extend the Employment Term, allow Executive to be an "Employee at Will", or not extend the Employment Term.


2.    Paragraph 2 of the Employment Agreement Amendment is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore:


During Executive's employment with the Company, the Company shall pay Executive a base salary (the "Base Salary") at the annual rate of $150,000.00 (One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents), payable in regular installments in accordance with the Company's usual payment practices.
        


All other terms and conditions of Your Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


        


IN WITNESS WEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first written above.


                                	
				
	AMERICAN MEDIA, INC.

	 
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ David Pecker
	 
	 

	 
	David Pecker
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	/s/ David Bonett
	 
	 

	 
	David Bonnett
#### Rayex Corporation et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Max Sanchez, Individually and as President of Local 1614, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Queens County,

December 10, 1956.

*Garey <& Garey*for plaintiffs.

*Henry Brichman*for defendants.

Cortland A. Johnson, J.

Plaintiffs’ motion for temporary injunction granted.

A formal contract exists between plaintiffs and another union, with no-strike and arbitration provisions. If plaintiffs’ employees are dissatisfied with their present union representation they should get rid of the contract by legal means; but while that contract is in effect, they have no right to break it; and the defendants have no right to induce or aid in its breach. Ample machinery exists for the consideration of the employees’ grievances, and they should make use of it.

The bond already furnished may be continued.

Settle order on notice.