alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Served: October 6, 2014

NOTICE

On October 2, 2014, American Airlines, Inc. (American) filed a motion requesting that 

the Department withdraw one daily U.S.-Haneda slot pair from Delta Air Lines, Inc. 

(Delta); and an application to reallocate that slot pair to American. 

Under the Department’s regulations, answers to motions are due within seven business 

days after the filing, while answers to applications are due within 15 days after filing.1

With respect to American’s October 2, 2014 motion and application, answers would 

normally be due October 14 and October 17, respectively. 

To simplify the administrative filing process, we have decided to extend the due date for 

answers to the motion portion of American’s filing to coincide with the due date for 

answers to the application portion. Accordingly, answers to American’s October 2, 2014, 

submission in this Docket shall be due on October 17, 2014. Replies to answers may 

address both the motion and the application and will be due on October 28, 2014.

We will serve this notice by electronic mail on all certificated U.S. combination carriers 

operating large aircraft; the U.S. Department of State (Office of Aviation Negotiations); 

the Federal Aviation Administration; and the Ambassador of Japan in Washington, D.C.

By:

PAUL L. GRETCH

Director, Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

 1 14 CFR 302.8, 302.11(c), and 302.307.

U.S.-Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding

 Docket DOT-OST-2010-0018
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3202 

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known 

as the Lacey Act, to add certain species of lionfish to the list of injurious 

species that are prohibited from being imported or shipped. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2015 

Mr. CLAWSON of Florida (for himself, Mr. JOLLY, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, Mr. 

CURBELO of Florida, Mr. CRENSHAW, and Mr. DIAZ-BALART) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 42 of title 18, United States Code, popularly known as the Lacey Act, to add certain species 

of lionfish to the list of injurious species that are prohibited from being imported or shipped. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Lionfish Elimination 

5 and Prevention Act of 2015’’ or as the ‘‘LEAP Act of 

6 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3202 IH

1 SEC. 2. ADDITION OF SPECIES OF LIONFISH TO THE LIST 

2 OF INJURIOUS SPECIES THAT ARE PROHIB3 ITED FROM BEING IMPORTED OR SHIPPED. 

4 Section 42(a)(1) of title 18, United States Code, is 

5 amended by inserting after ‘‘Dreissena polymorpha;’’ the 

6 following: ‘‘of the red lionfish of the species Pterois 

7 volitans; of the devil lionfish of the species Pterois miles; 

8 of the Hawaiian turkeyfish of the species Pterois sphex; 

9 of the soldier lionfish of the species Pterois russelii; of the 

10 clearfin lionfish of the species Pterois radiata; of the spe11 cies Pterois paucispinula; of the frillfin turkeyfish of the 

12 species Pterois mombasae; of the luna lionfish of the spe13 cies Pterois lunalata; of the mandritsa of the species 

14 Pterois brevipectoralis; of the spotfin lionfish of the spe15 cies Pterois antennata; of the scorpionfish of the species 

16 Pterois andover;’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  Hines Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.
 
  Maryland
 
  000-50805
    
    20-0138854(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)2800 Post Oak Boulevard, Suite 5000, Houston, Texas
    
    77056-6118(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (888) 220-6121
 
  Not Applicable
 
  see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 8.01      Other Events.
  
 Statements in this Current Report on Form 8-K, including intentions, beliefs, expectations or
projections relating to the timing of payment of distributions, are forward-looking statements
within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such statements are based on current expectations and
assumptions with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions
and future business decisions that may prove incorrect or inaccurate. Important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward looking statements include the
risks described in the Risk Factors section of Hines REITs Registration Statement on Form S-11,
its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 and its other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  HINES REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST, INC.August 31, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Frank R. ApolloFrank R. ApolloChief Accounting Officer
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350












In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bibb Corporation
(Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Judson Bibb, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)  the
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Registrant.











Date:   November  9,
2009                                                                     BIBB CORPORATION





/s/
Judson Bibb


By:
Judson Bibb, President,


Chief
Executive Officer, Secretary,


Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer


and
Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing VII, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin D. Eng, Chief Financial Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Martin D. Eng





Martin D. Eng


Chief Financial Officer


March 15, 2017
#### Ex parte Claude PRIVITT.

No. 17299.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 7, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 2, 1935.

Davenport & Loftin, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This is a companion case to Ex parte Claude Privitt, 77 S. W.(2d) 663, opinion this day handed down, the only difference being that the juror in this case is a different man from the one involved in the ease upon which we have written at length. The judgment is affirmed and relator is remanded.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 19, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (“CableLabs”) filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Shenzen Topway Video Communication Co., Ltd., Shenzen, Guangdong, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA; and Henan Cable TV Network Group Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA, have been terminated as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the venture. Membership in this venture remains open, and CableLabs intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On August 8, 1988, CableLabs filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 17, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 52096).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-23619 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 04-304 Date: June 8, 2004 

SUBJECT: IMPUTED COST FACTORS FOR THIRD QUARTER OF FY 2004 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program (FEHB) for the third quarter of FY 2004. The Pension, Health and Life cost factors will 

be provided near the end of the Fiscal Year. The imputed cost factors related to “Pensions” and 

Life Insurance will rarely change during the fiscal year and are not provided in this letter. Please 

refer to BAL 03-309 for the FY 2003 imputed cost factors relating to “Pensions” and Life 

Insurance as well as for the guidelines for computing your imputed costs. 

The imputed cost factor for the third quarter of FY 2004 related to the FEHB is $1,114. Thus, the 

FY 2004 year-to-date imputed cost factor related to the FEHB is: 

1st Quarter $1,077

2nd Quarter $1,096

3rd Quarter $1,114

Year-to-date $3,287

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, 

so we have a record of them. You may of course call us on 202-606-0606. 

Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

Financial Policy Group 

Center for Financial Services
Order entered December 13, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-01003-CR

JOSEPH AARON PEREZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 194th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F05-26451-M

ORDER

In his brief, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The 

record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs 

assessed in this case.

Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN 

DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization 

of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court 

appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, 

the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to 

receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include a 
document explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court 

appointed attorney fee.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary 

Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal 

Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
# L_2011098EN.01001601.xml

| 13.4.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 98/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 98/16

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 351/2011 of 11 April 2011 amending Regulation (EU) No 297/2011 imposing special conditions governing the import of feed and food originating in or consigned from Japan following the accident at the Fukushima nuclear power station

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 97 of 12 April 2011
  )

On page 23, Annex II is replaced as follows:

‘ANNEX II

Maximum levels for foodstuffs
   (1)
  (Bq/kg)

| | Foods for infants and young children | Milk and dairy products | Other foodstuffs, except liquid foodstuffs | Liquid foodstuffs |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Sum of Isotopes of strontium, notably Sr-90 | 75 | 125 | 750 | 125 |
| Sum of Isotopes of iodine, notably I-131 | 100  (2) | 300  (2) | 2 000 | 300  (2) |
| Sum of Alpha-emitting isotopes of plutonium and trans-plutonium elements, notably Pu-239, Am-241 | 1 | 1  (2) | 10  (2) | 1  (2) |
| Sum of all other nuclides of half-life greater than 10 days, notably Cs-134 and Cs-137, except C-14 and H-3 | 200  (2) | 200  (2) | 500  (2) | 200  (2) |

Foods for infants and young children

Milk and dairy products

Other foodstuffs, except liquid foodstuffs

Liquid foodstuffs

Sum of Isotopes of strontium, notably Sr-90

75

125

750

125

Sum of Isotopes of iodine, notably I-131

100  (2)

300  (2)

2 000

300  (2)

Sum of Alpha-emitting isotopes of plutonium and trans-plutonium elements, notably Pu-239, Am-241

1

1  (2)

10  (2)

1  (2)

Sum of all other nuclides of half-life greater than 10 days, notably Cs-134 and Cs-137, except C-14 and H-3

200  (2)

200  (2)

500  (2)

200  (2)

Maximum levels for feedingstuffs
   (3)
  (Bq/kg)

| | Feedingstuffs |
| --- | --- |
| Sum of Cs-134 and Cs-137 | 500  (4) |
| Sum of Isotopes of iodine, notably I-131 | 2 000  (5) |

Feedingstuffs

Sum of Cs-134 and Cs-137

500  (4)

Sum of Isotopes of iodine, notably I-131

2 000  (5)

---

(1)  The level applicable to concentrated or dried products is calculated on the basis of the reconstituted product as ready for consumption.

1

(2)  In order to ensure consistency with action levels currently applied in Japan, these values replace on a provisional basis the values laid down in Council Regulation (Euratom) No 3954/87.

2

(3)  Maximum level is relative to a feed with a moisture content of 12 %.’

3

(4)  In order to ensure consistency with action levels currently applied in Japan, this value replaces on a provisional basis the value laid down in Commission Regulation (Euratom) No 770/90.

4

(5)  This value is laid down on a provisional basis and taken to be the same as for foodstuffs, pending an assessment of transfer factors of iodine from feedingstuffs to food products.

5

---
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-15-00017-CV

Rosa Ena Cantu, Appellant

v.

Southern Insurance Company and Steve Dollery, Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY, 21ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 29,358, HONORABLE CARSON TALMADGE CAMPBELL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellees have filed a motion to dismissthis appeal and seek costs on the ground that

the appeal is frivolous. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss her appeal and a

response to appellees’ request for costs, asking that we deny the request. Appellant states that she

has conferred with appellees and that they do not oppose her motion. Appellant further states that

she and appellees were unable to agree on appellees’ motion for costs. We grant appellant’s motion,

dismiss appellees’ motion as moot, and dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1).
__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Rose, Justices Goodwin and Field

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: February 27, 2015

2
EX-35.1
(logo) Rialto
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT


March 1, 2013


To:  Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor
     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

2012 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series

* WFCM 2012-LC5

(Referred to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
   each of the Security Agreements are performed on behalf of the Special
   Servicer.

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer
   for the period of September 28, 2012, to December 31, 2012, in accordance
   with the servicing agreements applicable to each Security Agreement has been
   conducted under my supervision.

3. To the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
   obligations under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all material
   respects for the period of September 28, 2012, to December 31, 2012. If there
   has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect,
   each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically
   identified herewith.


Certified by: /s/ Thekla Salzman
              Thekla Salzman
              Chief Administrative Officer

Date: March 1, 2013
EXHIBIT
32





Certification
of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350












In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Bibb Corporation
(Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Judson Bibb, Chief Executive Officer, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and
belief:





(1)  the
report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  the information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of Registrant.











Date:  August
 9,
2009                                                                           BIBB CORPORATION





/s/
Judson Bibb


By:
Judson Bibb, President,


Chief
Executive Officer, Secretary,


Treasurer,
Chief Financial Officer


and
Principal Accounting Officer
STORAGE 

TANK for PMN 

SUBSTANCE

.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-6 for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2013 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 10, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2012-6 and U.S. Bank National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014By:

/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName:

Jennifer M. PoppTitle:

Chief Accounting OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 11-1028

___________

Cindy J. Cook, *

*

Plaintiff - Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States

v. * District Court for the

* District of Minnesota.

Anthony A. Petrocchi; Anthony A. *

Petrocchi, P.C., * [UNPUBLISHED]

*

Defendants - Appellees. *

___________

Submitted: November 14, 2011

Filed: January 9, 2012

___________

Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Cindy J. Cook appeals the district court’s1

 dismissal of her complaint alleging

violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. In

2007, Cook obtained a mortgage loan. Real Time Resolutions (RTR) was the loan

servicer. In August 2009 – and again in March 2010 – attorney Anthony A. Petrocchi

wrote Cook for his client, RTR, stating that RTR had tried to contact her to collect

1

The Honorable Ann D . Montgomery, United States District Judge for the

District of Minnesota.
payment on the mortgage and that failure to respond to the letters “may result in RTR

filing legal action” against her. Cook sued, alleging the letters violated the FDCPA. 

The district court dismissed Cook’s complaint for failure to state a claim under

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949

(2009).

We review de novo a district court’s dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6). See Van

Zee v. Hanson, 630 F.3d 1126, 1128 (8th Cir. 2011) (citing Gregory v. Dillard’s, Inc.,

565 F.3d 464, 472 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc)). Having reviewed the record and

considered Cook’s arguments, we affirm on the basis of the analysis set forth in the

district court’s thorough memorandum opinion and order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-