Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Notices 82213 

11We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

12See APO and Service Procedures. 

13See 19 CFR 351.310(d). 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

to Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 88 FR 60923 (September 6, 

2023); see also Certain Steel Racks and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China: 

Amended Final Affirmative Antidumping Duty 

Determination and Antidumping Duty Order; and 

Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 48584 (September 

16, 2019) (Order). 

2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

78298 (November 15, 2023) (Initiation Notice). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated May 28, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated August 8, 2024. Commerce 

notes that the tolling of certain deadlines in 

administrative proceedings actually occurred on 

July 22, 2024. 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review of Certain Steel Racks and 

Parts Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; 

2022–2023,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum). 

a public, executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.11 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the public 

executive summaries as the basis of the 

comment summaries included in the 

issues and decision memorandum that 

will accompany the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the public 

executive summary of each issue. Note 

that Commerce has amended certain of 

its requirements pertaining to the 

service of documents in 19 CFR 

351.303(f).12

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing, limited to issues raised in the 

case and rebuttal briefs, must submit a 

written request to the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance, filed electronically via 

ACCESS by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 

within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. Requests 

should contain: (1) the party’s name, 

address, and telephone number; (2) the 

number of participants; and (3) a list of 

issues to be discussed. Oral 

presentations at the hearing will be 

limited to issues raised in the briefs. If 

a request for a hearing is made, 

Commerce will inform parties of the 

scheduled date for the hearing.13

Assessment Rates 

Consistent with section 751(a)(1) of 

the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), upon 

issuance of the final results, Commerce 

shall determine, and U.S. Customs and 

Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review. 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after the date of publication of the 

final results of this review in the 

Federal Register. If a timely summons is 

filed at the U.S. Court of International 

Trade, the assessment instructions will 

direct CBP not to liquidate relevant 

entries until the time for parties to file 

a request for a statutory injunction has 

expired (i.e. , within 90 days of 

publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act, upon publication of the final 

results, Commerce intends to instruct 

CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amount indicated above with regard to 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review, except where the rate calculated 

in the final results is zero or de minimis. 

These cash deposit instructions, when 

imposed, shall remain in effect until 

further notice. 

Final Results 

Unless the deadline is extended 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(a) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

including the results of its analysis of 

issues by the parties in any written 

briefs, no later than 120 days after the 

date of publication of these preliminary 

results. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results in accordance with 

sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: October 4, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Diversification of India’s Economy 

V. Subsidies Valuation 

VI. Analysis of Programs 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–23499 Filed 10–9–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–088] 

Certain Steel Racks and Parts Thereof 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Preliminary Results and Partial 

Rescission of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

determines that the companies under 

review either sold certain steel racks 

and parts thereof (steel racks) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China) in 

the United States at prices below normal 

value (NV) during the period of review 

(POR) September 1, 2022, through 

August 31, 2023, or do not qualify for 

a separate rate. Further, Commerce is 

rescinding this review with respect to 

six companies. Commerce invites 

interested parties to comment on the 

preliminary results of this review. 

DATES: Applicable October 10, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jonathan Hill, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3518. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On September 6, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the 

antidumping duty order on steel racks 

from China.1 After receiving review 

requests, Commerce initiated this 

review with respect to nine companies.2

On May 28, 2024, Commerce extended 

the deadline for issuing the preliminary 

results of this review until September 

27, 2024.3 On August 8, 2024, 

Commerce tolled certain deadlines in 

this administrative review by seven 

days. The deadline for the final results 

of this review is now October 4, 2024.4

For a complete description of the 

events that followed the initiation of 

this review, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum.5 A list of topics 

discussed in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum is included as an 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
82214 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Notices 

6See Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing 

Co., Ltd.’s (Nanjing Dongsheng) Letter, ‘‘Withdraw 

of Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 9, 2024; United Material Handling Inc.’s 

(United Material) Letter, ‘‘Withdraw of Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated February 9, 2024; 

and Ningbo Xinguang Rack Co., Ltd.’s (Ningbo 

Xinguang Rack) and Xiamen Luckyroc Industry Co., 

Ltd.’s (Xiamen Luckyroc) Letter, ‘‘Withdrawal of 

Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated 

February 13, 2024. 

7See, e.g., Certain Carbon and Alloy Steel Cut-to 

Length Plate from the Federal Republic of Germany: 

Recission of Antidumping Administrative Review; 

2020–2021, 88 FR 4154 (January 24, 2023). 

8See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

9See, e.g., Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. 

United States, 380 F. Supp. 3d 1328, 1337 (CIT 

2019), at 12 (referring to section 751(a) of the Act, 

the U.S. Court of International Trade held that 

‘‘{w}hile the statute does not explicitly require that 

an entry be suspended as a prerequisite for 

establishing entitlement to a review, it does 

explicitly state the determined rate will be used as 

the liquidation rate for the reviewed entries. This 

result can only obtain if the liquidation of entries 

has been suspended’’; see also Certain Frozen Fish 

Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final 

Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 

2018–2019, 86 FR 36102 (July 8, 2021), and 

accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 4; and Solid Fertilizer Grade Ammonium 

Nitrate from the Russian Federation: Notice of 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 77 FR 65532 (October 29, 2012) (noting that 

‘‘for an administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended entry to be 

liquidated at the newly calculated assessment 

rate’’). 

10See Memorandum, ‘‘Automated Commercial 

System Shipment Query,’’ dated November 30, 

2023. 

11See Memorandum, ‘‘Notice of Intent to Rescind 

Review, In Part,’’ dated July 16, 2024. 

12See Notice of Final Determination of Sales at 

Less Than Fair Value, and Affirmative Critical 

Circumstances, In Part: Certain Lined Paper 

Products from the People’s Republic of China, 71 

FR 53079, 53082 (September 8, 2006); see also Final 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Final Partial Affirmative Determination of Critical 

Circumstances: Diamond Sawblades and Parts 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China, 71 FR 

29303, 29307 (May 22, 2006). 

13See Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

14See Initiation Notice, 88 FR at 78299. 

appendix to this notice. The Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Scope of the Order 

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is steel racks from China. A full 

description of the scope of the Order is 

contained in the Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of the Administrative 

Review 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), 

Commerce will rescind an 

administrative review, in whole or in 

part, if all parties who requested a 

review withdraw their requests within 

90 days of the date that the notice of 

initiation of the requested review was 

published in the Federal Register. All 

requests to review the following 

companies were timely withdrawn: (1) 

Nanjing Dongsheng Shelf Manufacturing 

Co., Ltd.; (2) Ningbo Xinguang Rack Co., 

Ltd.; and (3) Xiamen Luckyroc Industry 

Co., Ltd.6 Therefore, consistent with 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(1), Commerce is 

rescinding this review with respect to 

Nanjing Dongsheng, Ningbo Xinguang 

Rack, and Xiamen Luckyroc. 

Further, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3), it is Commerce’s practice 

to rescind an administrative review of 

an antidumping duty order where it 

concludes that there were no suspended 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR.7 Normally, upon completion 

of an administrative review, the 

suspended entries are liquidated at the 

antidumping duty assessment rate for 

the review period.8 Therefore, for an 

administrative review to be conducted, 

there must be a reviewable, suspended 

entry that Commerce can instruct U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to 

liquidate at the calculated antidumping 

duty assessment rate for the review 

period.9 Commerce notified all 

interested parties of its intent to rescind 

the instant review with respect to Hebei 

Minmetals Co., Ltd. (Hebei), Nanjing 

Ironstone Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. 

(Nanjing Ironstone), and Nanjing 

Kingmore Logistics Equipment 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (Nanjing 

Kingmore) because there were no 

reviewable, suspended entries of subject 

merchandise from these companies 

during the POR10 and invited interested 

parties to comment on Commerce’s 

intention to rescind the review with 

respect to these companies.11 We 

received no comments regarding this 

matter. In the absence of any suspended 

entries of subject merchandise from 

these companies during the POR, we are 

rescinding this administrative review of 

Hebei, Nanjing Ironstone, Nanjing 

Kingmore, in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.213(d)(3). 

Preliminary Affiliation and Single 

Entity Determination 

Based on record evidence in this 

review, Commerce preliminarily 

determines that mandatory respondent 

Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics 

Equipment Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu Nova) and 

the following companies are affiliated, 

pursuant to section 771(33)(E) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), 

and that they should be treated as a 

single entity, pursuant to 19 CFR 

351.401(f)(1)–(2): (1) Nanjing Jinshidai 

Storage Equipment Co., Ltd., and (2) 

Hebei Nova Intelligent Logistics 

Equipment Co., Ltd. For additional 

information, see the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce is conducting this review 

in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) 

of the Act. Commerce calculated 

constructed export price in accordance 

with section 772 of the Act. Further, 

because China is a non-market economy 

(NME) country within the meaning of 

section 771(18) of the Act, Commerce 

calculated NV in accordance with 

section 773(c) of the Act. For a full 

description of the methodology 

underlying our preliminary results, see 

the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Separate Rates 

In all proceedings involving an NME 

country, Commerce maintains a 

rebuttable presumption that all 

companies are subject to government 

control and, thus, should be assessed a 

single weighted-average dumping 

margin unless the company can 

affirmatively demonstrate an absence of 

government control, both in law (de 

jure) and in fact (de facto), with respect 

to its exports (i.e., can affirmatively 

demonstrate that it is eligible for a 

separate rate).12 Commerce has 

preliminarily determined that 

information placed on the record by 

Jiangsu Nova demonstrates that this 

company is eligible for a separate rate.13

However, Commerce has 

preliminarily determined that Jiangsu 

Starshine Industry Equipment Co., Ltd. 

(Starshine) has not demonstrated its 

eligibility for a separate rate because 

although it timely filed a separate rate 

application, it was selected as a 

mandatory respondent and failed to 

respond to Commerce’s questionnaire. 

In the Initiation Notice, Commerce 

stated that ‘‘. . . exporters and 

producers who submit a Separate Rate 

Application or Certification and 

subsequently are selected as mandatory 

respondents will no longer be eligible 

for separate rate status unless they 

respond to all parts of the questionnaire 

as mandatory respondents.’’ 14

Therefore, we have not granted 

Starshine a separate rate and have 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Notices 82215 

15See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963 (November 4, 2013). 

16The record shows no suspended POR entries 

for JISE, and it did not have a separate rate during 

the POR; thus, it remains part of the China-wide 

entity. 

17See Order, 84 FR at 48585. 

18See 19 CFR 351.309(d); see also Administrative 

Protective Order, Service, and Other Procedures in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 

88 FR 67069, 67077 (September 29, 2023) (APO and 

Service Final Rule). 

19See 19 351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2). 

20We use the term ‘‘issue’’ here to describe an 

argument that Commerce would normally address 

in a comment of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

21See APO and Service Final Rule. 

22See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

23We applied the assessment rate calculation 

methodology adopted in Antidumping Proceedings: 

Calculation of the Weighted-Average Dumping 

Margin and Assessment Rate in Certain 

Antidumping Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 

FR 8101 (February 14, 2012). 

24See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

treated it as part of the China-wide 

entity. 

The China-Wide Entity 

Commerce’s policy regarding 

conditional review of the China-wide 

entity applies to this administrative 

review.15 Under this policy, the Chinawide entity will not be under review 

unless a party specifically requests, or 

Commerce self-initiates, a review of the 

entity. Because no party requested a 

review of the China-wide entity, which 

includes Starshine and Jiangsu JISE 

Intelligent Storage Equipment Co., Ltd. 

(JISE),16 the entity is not under review, 

and the entity’s rate (i.e., 144.50 

percent) 17 is not subject to change. 

Preliminary Results of Review 

Commerce preliminarily determines 

that the following weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for the period 

September 1, 2022, through August 31, 

2023: 

Exporter 

Weighted-average 

dumping margin 

(percent) 

Jiangsu Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd./Nanjing Jinshidai Storage Equipment Co., Ltd./Hebei Nova Intelligent Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................... 10.14 

Disclosure and Public Comment 

Commerce intends to disclose the 

calculations and analysis that it 

performed in these preliminary results 

of review to parties to the proceeding 

within five days of any public 

announcement of these preliminary 

results or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of this notice in the 

Federal Register in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.224(b). 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.309(c)(1)(ii), 

interested parties may submit case briefs 

to Commerce no later than 30 days after 

the date of publication of these 

preliminary results of review in the 

Federal Register. Rebuttal briefs, 

limited to issues raised in the case 

briefs, may be filed no later than five 

days after the date for filing case 

briefs.18 Interested parties who submit 

case briefs or rebuttal briefs in this 

proceeding must submit: (1) a table of 

contents listing each issue addressed; 

and (2) a table of authorities.19

As provided under 19 CFR 

351.309(c)(2) and (d)(2), in prior 

proceedings we have encouraged 

interested parties to provide an 

executive summary of their briefs that 

should be limited to five pages total, 

including footnotes. In this review, we 

instead request that interested parties 

provide, at the beginning of their briefs, 

a public executive summary for each 

issue raised in their briefs.20 Further, we 

request that interested parties limit their 

executive summary of each issue to no 

more than 450 words, not including 

citations. We intend to use the executive 

summaries as the basis of the comment 

summaries included in the issues and 

decision memorandum that we will 

issue for the final results in this 

administrative review. We request that 

interested parties include footnotes for 

relevant citations in the executive 

summary of each issue. Note that 

Commerce has amended certain of its 

requirements pertaining to the service of 

documents in 19 CFR 351.303(f).21

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.310(c), 

interested parties who wish to request a 

hearing must submit a written hearing 

request to the Assistant Secretary for 

Enforcement and Compliance, filed 

electronically via Enforcement and 

Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

Requests should contain: (1) the 

requesting party’s name, address, and 

telephone number; (2) the number of 

individuals from the requesting party 

that will attend the hearing and whether 

any of those individuals is a foreign 

national; and (3) a list of the issues the 

party intends to discuss at the hearing. 

Issues raised in the hearing by a party 

will be limited to those raised in the 

party’s case and rebuttal briefs. An 

electronically filed hearing request must 

be received successfully in its entirety 

by Commerce’s electronic records 

system, ACCESS, by 5 p.m. Eastern 

Time within 30 days after the date of 

publication of this notice. 

Assessment Rates 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, the assessment 

of antidumping duties on entries of 

merchandise covered by the review 

shall be based on the final results of this 

review. Therefore, upon issuance of the 

final results of review, Commerce will 

determine, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise covered 

by this review.22

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these preliminary results 

in the Federal Register. If a timely 

summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 

International Trade, the assessment 

instructions will direct CBP not to 

liquidate relevant entries until the time 

for parties to file a request for a statutory 

injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 

days of publication). 

Commerce will calculate importer or 

customer-specific assessment rates for 

the individually examined respondent, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(1).23 Where the respondent 

reported reliable entered values, 

Commerce will calculate importer or 

customer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rates by dividing the total 

amount of dumping calculated in the 

final results of this review for all 

reviewed U.S. sales to the importer/ 

customer by the total entered value of 

the merchandise sold to the importer/ 

customer.24 Where the respondent did 

not report entered values, Commerce 

will calculate importer or customerspecific per-unit assessment rates by 

dividing the total amount of dumping 

calculated in the final results of this 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
82216 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Notices 

25 Id. 

26See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

27See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), for a full discussion 

of this practice. 

28See Order, 84 FR at 48586. 

1See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 88 FR 

78298 (November 15, 2023). 

review for all reviewed U.S. sales to the 

importer/customer by the total quantity 

of those sales. While Commerce will 

calculate estimated ad valorem importer 

or customer-specific assessment rates to 

determine whether the per-unit 

assessment rates are de minimis, 

Commerce will use the per-unit 

assessment rates where entered values 

were not reported.25 Where either the 

respondent’s ad valorem weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de 

minimis, or an importer or customerspecific ad valorem assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis,26 Commerce will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties. 

Pursuant to a refinement to 

Commerce’s assessment practice, where 

sales of subject merchandise exported 

by an individually examined 

respondent were not reported in the 

U.S. sales data submitted by the 

respondent, but the merchandise was 

entered into the United States during 

the POR, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate any entries of such 

merchandise at the antidumping duty 

assessment rate for the China-wide 

entity.27

Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries of subject merchandise 

exported by companies that are not 

eligible for a separate rate and which are 

therefore considered to be part of the 

China-wide entity, at the weightedaverage dumping margin for the Chinawide entity, i.e., 144.50 percent.28

Pursuant to a refinement to 

Commerce’s assessment practice, where 

sales of subject merchandise exported 

by an individually examined 

respondent were not reported in the 

U.S. sales data submitted by the 

respondent, but the merchandise was 

entered into the United States during 

the POR, Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate any entries of such 

merchandise at the antidumping duty 

assessment rate for the China-wide 

entity.29 Commerce will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries of subject merchandise 

exported by the companies for which it 

rescinded the review at the cash deposit 

rate required at the time of entry. 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be in effect for all 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on, or after, the date of 

publication of the notice of the final 

results of this administrative review in 

the Federal Register, as provided for by 

section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for an 

exporter granted a separate rate in the 

final results of this review, the cash 

deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin 

established in the final results of this 

review for the exporter (except, if the 

rate is de minimis, then a cash deposit 

rate of zero will be required); (2) for a 

previously investigated or reviewed 

exporter of subject merchandise not 

under review that has a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will continue to be 

the exporter’s existing cash deposit rate; 

(3) for all China exporters of subject 

merchandise that do not have a separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be equal 

to the weighted-average dumping 

margin assigned to the China-wide 

entity, which is 144.50 percent; and (4) 

for a non-China exporter of subject 

merchandise that does not have a 

separate rate, the cash deposit rate will 

be equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin applicable to the China 

exporter(s) that supplied that non-China 

exporter. 

These cash deposit requirements, 

when imposed, shall remain in effect 

until further notice. 

Final Results of Review 

Unless otherwise extended, 

Commerce intends to issue the final 

results of this administrative review, 

which will include the results of its 

analysis of issues raised in case and 

rebuttal briefs, within 120 days of 

publication of these preliminary results 

of review in the Federal Register, 

pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the 

Act. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 

the reimbursement of antidumping and/ 

or countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during the POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

preliminary results of review in 

accordance with sections 751(a)(l) and 

777(i)(l) of the Act, and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2) and 351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: October 4, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix—List of Topics in the 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Affiliation and Single Entity Treatment 

V. Discussion of Methodology 

VI. Currency Conversion 

VII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2024–23486 Filed 10–9–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–580–870] 

Certain Oil Country Tubular Goods 

From the Republic of Korea: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2022– 

2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) preliminarily 

finds that certain oil country tubular 

goods (OCTG) from the Republic of 

Korea (Korea) were sold in the United 

States at prices below normal value. The 

period of review (POR) is September 1, 

2022, through August 31, 2023. 

Interested parties are invited to 

comment on these preliminary results. 

DATES: Applicable October 10, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney or Mark Flessner, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475 or 

(202) 482–6312, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

These preliminary results are made in 

accordance with section 751(a)(3)(A) of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the 

Act). Commerce published the notice of 

initiation of this administrative review 

on November 15, 2023.1 On May 2, 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1