alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1391 

CA 12-01134 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND WHALEN, JJ. 

 

CALVIN BAKER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, 

V ORDER

FRANK MURANO AND DONNA MURANO, 

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

---------------------------------------- 

FRANK MURANO AND DONNA MURANO, 

THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS,

V

 

WILLIAM PATTON, DOING BUSINESS AS PATTON 

HOME IMPROVEMENT, THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT. 

 

SEGAR & SCIORTINO PLLC, ROCHESTER (STEPHEN A. SEGAR OF COUNSEL), FOR

PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT.

HISCOCK & BARCLAY, LLP, ROCHESTER (ROBERT M. SHADDOCK OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. 

 

Appeal from a judgment and order (one paper) of the Supreme

Court, Monroe County (John J. Ark, J.), entered December 9, 2011. The

judgment and order, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiff’s

motion for partial summary judgment. 

Now, upon the stipulation of settlement and discontinuance of

action signed by the attorneys for the parties and filed in the Monroe

County Clerk’s Office on September 17, 2012,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: February 1, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
#### Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, Appellant, vs. J. P. Cullen & Son, a copartnership, Respondent.

*May 27*

July *1, 1948.*

For the appellant there was a brief by the *Attorney General, Stewart G. Honeck,*deputy attorney general, and *Beatrice Lampert,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mrs. Lampert.*«,

For the respondent there was a brief by *McGowan, Geffs, Geffs & Block*of Janesville, and oral argument by *George S. Geffs*and *Jacob Geffs.*

*110Per Curiam.*

This is a companion case to *Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen & Son,*wherein Clarence Allard applied to the Wisconsin Employment Relations Board for redress. In this action Robert Schroeder was employed by respondent as a laborer on the Marinette project on September 12, 1946, and was later discharged. The board found the termination of his services was an unfair labor practice and entered a cease-and-desist order and directed notices to be posted by respondent and the employee reimbursed for his loss of wages. The procedure thereafter was the same as the Allard case. This case was argued and submitted with the case of *Wisconsin E. R. Board v. J. P. Cullen & Son, ante,*p. 105, 33 N. W. (2d) 182, and is ruled by the decision therein.

Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings according to law.

Martin, J., took no part.

*

The opinion in,this case was prepared by the late Mr. Justice Barlow.
# L_2011122EN.01006701.xml

| 11.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 122/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 122/67

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 449/2011

of 6 May 2011

entering certain names in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (
  Image 1
  (Shaanxi ping guo) (PDO),
  Image 2
  (Longjing Cha) (PDO),
  Image 3
  (Guanxi Mi You) (PDO),
  Image 4
  (Lixian Ma Shan Yao) (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, the applications of the People’s Republic of China to register the names ‘



  (Shaanxi ping guo)’, ‘



  (Longjing Cha)’, ‘



  (Guanxi Mi You)’ and ‘



  (Lixian Ma Shan Yao)’ were published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Image 5

Image 6

Image 7

Image 8

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, these names should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The names contained in the Annex to this Regulation are hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 6 May 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 252, 18.9.2010, p. 16; OJ C 254, 22.9.2010, p. 6; OJ C 257, 24.9.2010, p. 3; OJ C 257, 24.9.2010, p. 7.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

| | (Guanxi Mi You) (PDO) |
| --- | --- |

Image 9
  (Guanxi Mi You) (PDO)

| | (Lixian Ma Shan Yao) (PGI) |
| --- | --- |

Image 10
  (Lixian Ma Shan Yao) (PGI)

| | (Shaanxi ping guo) (PDO) |
| --- | --- |

Image 11
  (Shaanxi ping guo) (PDO)

Class 1.8.   Other products of Annex I to the Treaty (spices, etc.)

PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA

Image 12
  (Longjing Cha) (PDO)

---
Declaration of Domestic Partnership

The Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program

“Domestic partner” means a person in a domestic partnership with an employee, annuitant, member of the uniformed 

services, or retired member of the uniformed services.

“Domestic partnership” means a committed relationship between two adults, of the opposite or same sex, in which 

the partners meet all of the requirements below.

We attest and declare that all of the following statements are true and correct.

f We are each other’s sole domestic partner and intend to remain so indefinitely.

f We maintain a common residence and intend to continue todoso (or would maintain a common residence

but for an assignment abroad or other employment-related, financial, or similar obstacle).

f We are at least 18 years of age and mentally competent to consent to a contract.

f We share responsibility for a significant measure of each other’s financial obligations.

f We are not married or joined in a civil union to anyone else.

f We are not a domestic partner of anyone else.

f We are not related in a way that would prohibit legal marriage in the U.S. jurisdiction in which

the domestic partnership was formed.

We also agree to and understand that:

f We must notify the appropriate employing agency, military branch, or retirement system if, atany time between

the time of application and the time coverage is scheduled to go into effect, we no longer meet the definition of

domestic partnership, in which case our domestic partnership is deemed terminated. We understand that such 

notification must be made as soon as possible, but in no event later than 30 calendar days after our domestic

partnership is terminated.

f Willful falsification of information within this document may lead to disciplinary action and the recovery

of the cost of benefits received related to such falsification, and may also constitute a criminal violation

under 18 U.S.C. 1001.

Name of employee or annuitant

Please fill out the information below.

 

First name M.I. Last name

Signature of employee or annuitant 

Date signed / /

(mm/dd/yyyy)

Social Security number or other identifier Civil service retirement number (CSA or CSF), if applicable

 

Name of domestic partner

First name M.I. Last name

Signature of domestic partner 

Date signed / / Date domestic partnership wasformed / /

(mm/dd/yyyy) (mm/dd/yyyy)

To complete the registration of this domestic partnership, you must file this form with your current employing agency, 

military branch, or retirement system. Please keep a copy for your own records.

Agency,military branch, orretirementsystem receipt

Name and signature of agency, military branch, or retirement system official and date or official date stamp or other

means by which the agency, military branch, or retirement system indicates official receipt:

Name

Signature Date / /

(mm/dd/yyyy)

DP v. 2 0815 August 2015
Holland & Knight 

800 17th Street, NW, Suite 1100 I Washington, DC 200061 T 202.955.3000 IF 202.955.5564 

Holland & Knight LLP 1 www.hklaw.com 

Anita M. Mesner 

(202) 419-2604 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com 

Via www.regulations.gov 

Mr. Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Ave., S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

January 26, 2015 

Re: Etihad Airways- Garuda Indonesia Codesharing; Notice of Termination 

(Docket No. OST-2013-0008) 

Dear Mr. Gretch: 

By Notice of Action Taken ("NOAT'') issued on January 17, 2013, the Department 

granted to Etihad Airways, P.J.S.C. ("Etihad") a Statement of Authorization permitting Etihad to 

carry the PT Garuda Indonesia (Persero) TBK ("Garuda Indonesia") designator code on flights 

operated by Etihad between Abu Dhabi on the one hand, and New York and Chicago, on the 

other hand. 1 

In accordance with the conditions attached to the NOAT, Etihad hereby advises the 

Department that the Etihad-Garuda Indonesia codeshare arrangement has been terminated. 

cc: Service List 

Robert Finamore 

Respectfully submitted, 

HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP 

Anita M. Mesner 

Attorney for Etihad Airways, P.J.S.C 

Nana Haryana, Senior Manager Alliance & International Affairs, PT Garuda Indonesia 

(Persero) TBK 

1 Notice of Action Taken, Docket No. OST-2013-0008 (Jan. 17, 2013). 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date served the foregoing document on the persons identified 

below by causing a copy to be sent by electronic mail. 

robert.wirick@aa.com 

howard. kass@aa. com 

sharon.pasley@fedex.com 

sllunsford@fedex. com 

dan. weiss@united. com 

sascha. vanderbellen@delta. com 

rpommer@atlasair. com 

kevin. montgomery@polaraircargo. com 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

jennifer.nowak@hklaw.com (Counsel for United Parcel Service) 

jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com 

jcanny@amerijet.com 

matwood@cozen.com (Counsel for Kalitta Air) 

john.s.duncan@faa.gov 

cristinasa@state. gov 

robert. finamore@dot.gov 

nan a. hr@garuda-indonesia. com
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO



SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the annual
report on Form 10-K of Amperico Corp. (the "Company") for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2015 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "report"), the undersigned, Alex Norton, President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



(1)  The report fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



| | Dated: December 30, 2019 | By: | /s/ Richard DiBiase                                                                 | 
| | ------------------------ | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
| |                          |     | Richard DiBiase, President and Chief Executive 
Officer and Chief Financial Officer |
Featured           ‘Frankenstein design’ enables 3D printed neutron collimator          

Featured           Metal steam turbine blade shows cutting-edge potential for critical, large 3D-printed parts         

Featured           Researchers 3D print moon rover wheel prototype with NASA         

# Precision Manufacturing and Machining

### Contact

ScottSmith

smithss@ornl.gov

##  

## Integrating robotics, automation, controls and machine tools in next generation systems

 

The Precision Manufacturing and Machining Section is responsible for designing, implementing and scaling next generation manufacturing systems and processes through the integration of robotics, automation, controls, and machine tools.

The section includes the following groups: Intelligent Machine Tools; Manufacturing Automation and Controls; Manufacturing Systems Design; and Robotics and Intelligent Systems.

Researchers in the Intelligent Machine Tools Group focus on developing technologies to include subtractive manufacturing capabilities in existing additive manufacturing machines. The

Manufacturing Automation and Controls Group develop automated manufacturing systems leveraging data analytics, sensing, and control systems technology to ensure a highly efficient U.S. manufacturing ecosystem.

The Manufacturing Systems Design Group collaborates with equipment manufacturers and end users to advance state-of-the-art technologies and revolutionize the way products are designed and built using additive manufacturing technology. Robotics and Intelligent Systems Group researchers focus on developing world-class manufacturing technology around intelligent automation including electro-mechanical systems, computation and sensor technologies.

## Current Research

## News

‘Frankenstein design’ enables 3D printed neutron collimator 

## News

Metal steam turbine blade shows cutting-edge potential for critical, large 3D-printed parts

## News

Researchers 3D print moon rover wheel prototype with NASA

## News

Pulaski plant achieves more durable product through work with advanced manufacturing experts
Exhibit 32.2

Written Statement of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, I, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of Homeowners Choice, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify, based on my knowledge, that
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2010 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ RICHARD R. ALLENRichard R. AllenChief Financial OfficerNovember 12, 2010


A signed original of this
document has been provided to Homeowners Choice, Inc. and will be retained by Homeowners Choice, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



45
# L_2015214DE.01002901.xml

| 13.8.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 214/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.8.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 214/29

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 142/2011 der Kommission vom 25. Februar 2011 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1069/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates mit Hygienevorschriften für nicht für den menschlichen Verzehr bestimmte tierische Nebenprodukte sowie zur Durchführung der Richtlinie 97/78/EG des Rates hinsichtlich bestimmter gemäß der genannten Richtlinie von Veterinärkontrollen an der Grenze befreiter Proben und Waren

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 54 vom 26. Februar 2011
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 54 vom 26. Februar 2011

Seite 54, Anhang VIII Kapitel II Nummer 2 Buchstabe b Ziffer xiv; Seite 80, Anhang XII Satz 1; Seite 80, Anhang XII Nummer 1; Seite 80, Anhang XII Nummer 1 Buchstaben b und c; Seite 81, Anhang XII Nummern 6, 7 und 9:

anstatt:

„Zwischenerzeugnissen“

muss es heißen:

„Zwischenprodukten“.

Seite 80, Anhang XII Überschrift; Seite 81, Anhang XII Nummern 4 und 8:

anstatt:

„Zwischenerzeugnisse“

muss es heißen:

„Zwischenprodukte“.

---
### ATTACHMENT A

Best Available Retrofit Technology Applicability Analysis submitted by

O

- N Minerals (Chemstone) Company, September 2006
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2812 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2812

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide a waiver of the 
oath of renunciation and allegiance for naturalization of aliens having 
                         certain disabilities.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2000

Mr. Hatch (for himself, Mr. Dodd, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. DeWine, Mr. Kohl, 
Mr. Feingold, and Mr. Kennedy) introduced the following bill; which was 
       read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide a waiver of the 
oath of renunciation and allegiance for naturalization of aliens having 
                         certain disabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. WAIVER OF OATH OF RENUNCIATION AND ALLEGIANCE FOR 
              NATURALIZATION OF ALIENS HAVING CERTAIN DISABILITIES.

    (a) In General.--The last sentence of section 337(a) of the 
Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1448(a)) is amended to read 
as follows: ``The Attorney General may waive the taking of the oath if 
in the opinion of the Attorney General the applicant for naturalization 
is an individual with a disability, or a child, who is unable to 
understand or communicate an understanding of the meaning of the oath. 
If the Attorney General waives the oath for such an individual, the 
individual shall be considered to have met the requirements of section 
316(a)(3) as to attachment to the Constitution and well disposition to 
the United States.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to individuals who applied for naturalization before, on, or 
after the date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 10.2

 

SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

 

This AMENDMENT (“Amendment”) is made this 8th day of August, 2014 to the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) by and between Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. a Delaware corporation (the “Employer”), and Jack Khattar (the “Executive”).

 

WHEREAS, the Executive and Employer originally entered into an employment agreement dated December 22, 2005;

 

WHEREAS, on February 29, 2012, the Executive and Employer most recently amended and restated such employment agreement effective January 1, 2012; 

 

WHEREAS, the parties hereto wish to amend such employment agreement as provided herein;

 

WHEREAS, Section 16 of the Agreement provides that the Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument signed by the Executive and by a duly authorized representative of the Employer;

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledge, the parties hereto, intending to be bound hereby, agree that the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

 

AMENDMENT

 

1.                                      Section 6(a)(ii) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding “and” to the end thereof.

 

2.                                      Section 6(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended by adding the following new Section 6(a)(iii) to the end thereof:

 

(iii)                               if, and only if, on the date of, or within 12 months after, a Change in Control, the Executive’s employment is terminated by the Executive for Good Reason or by the Employer without Cause, then the Executive’s stock-based compensation arrangements shall be fully vested and nonforfeitable on the date of such termination of employment and shall continue to be exercisable and payable in accordance with terms that apply under such arrangements other than any vesting requirements; provided that in no event will the time and form of payment of any such arrangement that is subject to Section 409A of the Code (as defined in Section 6(b) below) be modified as result of such vesting.

 

3.                                      The last paragraph of Section 6(a) of the Agreement is hereby amended to replace the term “Termination Benefits,” in both places such term appears in such paragraph, with the phrase “the Termination Benefits described in Sections 6(a)(i) – (ii) above.”

 











 

4.                                      Except as expressly provided herein, the remaining terms of the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.

 

	
 
    	
SUPERNUS PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/   Greg S. Patrick
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Name:
    	
Greg   Patrick
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Title:
    	
Chief Financial Officer
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
/s/ Jack Khattar
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
Jack Khattar
    


 

2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON EMERGENCY MOTION

Appellate case name: In re Ramesh Kapur d/b/a AIC Management

Appellate case number: 01-22-00556-CV

Trial court case number: 2019-03530

Trial court: 333rd District Court of Harris County

Date motion filed: September 1, 2022

Party filing motion: Relator

On July 29, 2022, Relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to set aside the 

trial court’s order granting Real Party in Interest’s Motion for Judgment Nunc Pro Tunc. Relator 

filed a corresponding Emergency Motion for Temporary Relief seeking a stay of the trial court’s 

judgment pending resolution of his petition. We denied Relator’s Emergency Motion for 

Temporary Relief on August 1, 2022. 

On September 1, 2022, Relator filed a Motion for Emergency Hearing requesting that we 

“provide relief until such time [as his] petition for writ of mandamus has been ruled by this court.” 

Relator’s Motion for Emergency Hearing is DENIED. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10. 

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

Acting individually

Date: September 2, 2022