alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Publications

## Filter Publications

### Publication Type

            - Book
            - Book Chapter
            - Conference Paper
            - Journal
            - ORNL Report
            - Thesis / Dissertation

### Publication Date

            - 2024(19)
            - 2023(176)
            - 2022(185)
            - 2021(189)
            - 2020(183)
            - 2019(187)
            - 2018(153)
            - 2017(156)
            - 2016(137)
            - 2015(153)
            - 2014(127)
            - 2013(157)
            - 2012(142)
            - 2011(171)
            - 2010(157)
            - 2009(132)
            - 2008(111)
            - 2007(69)
            - 2006(35)
            - 2005(13)
            - 2004(6)
            - 2003(4)
            - 2002(3)
            - 2001(1)
            - 2000(1)
            - 1997(1)
            - 1993(1)
            - 1992(1)
            - 1991(1)
            - 1989(1)

##   Silo Storage for IVG.1M Irradiated HEU

December, 2024

##   High-gradient magnetic separation of colloidal uranium oxide particles from soil components in aqueous suspensions

November, 2024

##   Final Report: Energy Delivery Systems with Verifiable Trustworthiness

February, 2024

##   Downscaling Synthetic Populations to Realistic Residential Locations

February, 2024

##   Heartbeat: Detecting Malware by Periodic Power Signal Injection and Monitoring

February, 2024

##   Absolute Branching Ratios of Prominent γ Rays Following α Decay of 233U...

February, 2024

##   Raman spectroscopic investigation of selected natural uranyl sulfate minerals

February, 2024

##   Strategies for a scalable multi-robot large scale wire arc additive manufacturing system...

February, 2024

##   Optimal Chloride Salt Mixture for a Fusion Blanket

January, 2024

##   Planning for Material Control and Accountancy at Liquid-Fueled Molten Salt Reactors...

January, 2024

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
- …
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission on Civil Rights

# AGENCY:

United States Commission on Civil Rights.

# ACTION:

Notice of Commission public business meeting.

      ( print page 82971)    

# DATES:

Friday, October 18, 2024, 10:00 a.m. EST.

# ADDRESSES:

                        Meeting to take place virtually and is open to the public via livestream on the Commission's YouTube page:                         *https://www.youtube.com/​user/​USCCR/​videos.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Joe Kim: 202-376-8371;                         *publicaffairs@usccr.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    In accordance with the Government in Sunshine Act (5 U.S.C. 552b), the Commission on Civil Rights is holding a meeting to discuss the Commission's business for the month. This business meeting is open to the public. Computer assisted real-time transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in English) on October 10, 2024, is                     *https://www.streamtext.net/​player?​event=​USCCR.*                     Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.                

I. Approval of Agenda

II. Business Meeting

A. Presentation by New Hampshire Advisory Committee Chair on Released Reports and Memorandum on Solitary Confinement

B. Presentation by South Dakota Advisory Committee Chair on Released Reports and Memorandum on Voting Rights and Access

C. Presentation by Tennessee Advisory Committee Chair on Released Reports and Memorandum on Civil and Voting Rights

D. Management and Operations
    - Staff Director's Report

III. Adjourn Meeting

 Dated: October 10, 2024.

Zakee Martin,

USCCR Special Assistant to the Staff Director.

[FR Doc. 2024-23843 Filed 10-10-24; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court

generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order

and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

F I L E D

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

APR 25 2000

PATRICK FISHER

Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

DARLENE QUINN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 99-6296

(D.C. No. 99-CV-500-T)

(W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , EBEL , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Plaintiff Darlene Quinn, proceeding pro se, brought this action against the

Internal Revenue Service alleging that it was liable for various acts related to
-2-

other individuals’ use of her social security number on their tax returns. On the

government’s motion, the district court determined that plaintiff had failed to

state a claim on which relief could be granted, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and

dismissed the action with prejudice. Plaintiff appeals. We have jurisdiction

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We review the dismissal of a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) de novo. See

Sutton v. Utah State Sch. for the Deaf & Blind , 173 F.3d 1226, 1236 (10th Cir.

1999). We have fully considered plaintiff’s arguments on appeal and reviewed

the record, and we are not persuaded that the district court erred. Therefore, for

substantially the same reasons as stated in the district court’s July 6, 1999 order,

we affirm the district court’s dismissal of plaintiff’s claims.

AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha

Circuit Judge
#### State, Appellant, vs. First Wisconsin National Bank of Milwaukee, Respondent.

*January 16*

February *25, 1947.*

The cause was submitted for the appellant on the briefs of the *Attorney General, Stewart G. Honeck,*deputy attorney general, *Beatrice Lampert,*assistant attorney general, and *108*James A. Nance*of Madison, and for the respondent on the brief of *Miller, Mack & Fairchild, Paul R. Newcomb,*and *Lynford Lardner, Jr.,*all of Milwaukee.

Fairchild, J.

With relation to the method devised by the legislature for the escheatage of unclaimed bank balances, the statutes and rules in equity, if such apply, governing the allowance of costs, do not permit the court in the exercise of its discretion to allow the transferring bank attorney fees. The only item chargeable against the accounts to be taken over by the state is for expense incurred by the bank in publishing notice to advise those whose interest may be affected that the time has come for the.transfer of the amount due from the bank on such accounts to the state. Sec. 220.25 (3) (e), Stats.

The sections in the statutes regulating costs do not warrant the allowance asked for by respondent. Nor does the rule apply which permits a court under some circumstances to make an allowance out of a fund created or preserved at the expense of a party or where a common fund is brought into court. The bank has not created this fund; it has done little more to preserve it than it was already bound to the depositors to do. It was required by statute to report such inactive accounts to the state and to publish notice of those accounts, but for the expense of such notice the statute specifically provides for the bank’s reimbursement. Instead of honoring the check of the depositor, the bank under the escheat statute delivers to the state. The state stands at that time in the place and stead of the depositors, and resistance by the bank to the paying over would be governed in one instance by the same rules as in the other.

The part of the judgment allowing the fee must be reversed.

The learned trial judge calls our attention to words used in affirming his ruling in *State v. Marshall & Ilsley Bank*(1940), 234 Wis. 375, 379, 291 N. W. 361, 363, which suggest that it is a discretionary order and a matter in which *109an allowance of attorney fees may be made. The statement was passingly made as sufficient for that case, but it does carry an implication which does not find support in the statute. We were in error in putting our ruling with respect to this point upon the ground that the allowance of an attorney fee was in the discretion of the trial court. We accept responsibility for misleading the trial court in this case, and for reasons heretofore set forth withdraw the statement.

*By the Court.*— The part of the judgment appealed from is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to disallow the attorney fees.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nitin Karnik, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Tres Estrellas Enterprises' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Tres Estrellas Enterprises,
Inc.

Date: May 11, 2009                            By: /s/ Nitin Karnik
                                                 -------------------------------
                                              Name:  Nitin Karnik
                                              Title: Chief Executive Officer
[Cite as State v. Van Kell, 2021-Ohio-109.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT 

LAKE COUNTY, OHIO 

STATE OF OHIO, : MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 Plaintiff-Appellee, : 

 CASE NO. 2020-L-126

 - vs - : 

JAMES M. VAN KELL, : 

 Defendant-Appellant. : 

Criminal Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas, Case No. 2018 CR 000672. 

Judgment: Appeal dismissed. 

Charles E. Coulson, Lake County Prosecutor, Lake County Administration Building, 

105 Main Street, P.O. Box 490, Painesville, OH 44077 (For Plaintiff-Appellee). 

James M. Van Kell, pro se, PID# A770-631, Trumbull Correctional Institution, 5701 

Burnett Road, P.O. Box 640, Leavittsburg, OH 44430 (Defendant-Appellant). 

THOMAS R. WRIGHT, J. 

{¶1} On December 21, 2020, appellant, James M. Van Kell, pro se, filed a 

notice of appeal from the trial court’s November 14, 2019 sentencing entry, which he 

attached to his notice. A timely notice was due no later than December 16, 2019, which 

was not a holiday or weekend. The appeal is untimely by over a year. 

{¶2} “* * * [A] party who wishes to appeal from an order that is final upon its 

entry shall file the notice of appeal required by App.R. 3 within 30 days of that entry.” 

App.R. 4(A)(1). 
2

{¶3} “(1) After the expiration of the thirty day period provided by App.R. 4(A) for 

the filing of a notice of appeal as of right, an appeal may be taken by a defendant with 

leave of the court to which the appeal is taken in the following classes of cases: 

{¶4} “(a) Criminal proceedings; * * * 

{¶5} “(2) A motion for leave to appeal shall be filed with the court of appeals 

and shall set forth the reasons for the failure of the appellant to perfect an appeal as of 

right. * * *.” App.R. 5(A). 

{¶6} Appellant has neither complied with the thirty-day rule set forth in App.R. 

4(A)(1) nor sought leave to appeal under App.R. 5(A). Thus, this court is without 

jurisdiction to consider his appeal. Appellant has a remedy of filing an untimely criminal 

appeal under App.R. 5(A). 

{¶7} Appeal dismissed, sua sponte, as untimely. 

MARY JANE TRAPP, P.J., 

MATT LYNCH, J., 

concur.
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/ Melissa Lopez                                         |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Melissa Lopez                                                        |
|  Title:    |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  December 14, 2010                                                    |
Exhibit 31.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



I, Karen Aalders, certify that:



1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of SKREEM Records Corp.



2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4.   The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the Evaluation Date); and



c)   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



5.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrants auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls; and



6.   The registrants other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Dated: May 16, 2008



|    |                        
|--- | -----------------------
|By: | /s/ Karen Aalders      
|    | Karen Aalders          
|    | Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

Supreme Court Cause No. DA 24-0098

__________________________________________________________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: 

HANNAH HAN,

Petitioner/Appellee,

and

MAURICE DEGENNARO, 

Respondent/Appellant.

ORDER GRANTING

EXTENSION OF TIME 

Upon consideration of Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time to File 

Opening Brief and Affidavit in Support, and for good cause appearing therefore, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 16, 2024, within which to file his Opening Brief. 

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 12 2024

07/12/2024

Case Number: DA 24-0098
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,
v. KINGSLEY LLOYD BOWEN, Defendant - Appellant. No. 10-10547 D.C. No. 2:09-cr-00679-SRB-3
MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding Submitted April 20, 2012 **

San Francisco, California Before: SCHROEDER, THOMAS, and GRABER, Circuit Judges. Kingsley Lloyd Bowen appeals his convictions of Conspiracy to Possess with Intent To Distribute 1,000 Kilograms or More of Marijuana (21 U.S.C. §§ 846; 841(a)(1); 841(b)(1)(A)(vii)); Conspir acy to Launder Monetary Instruments 

# FILED
APR 24 2012 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 (18 U.S.C. § 1956(h)); Conspiracy to Destroy or Remove Property to Prevent Seizure (18 U.S.C. § 371); and Destruc tion or Removal of Property to Prevent Seizure (18 U.S.C. § 2232(a)). Because the parties are familiar with the history of the case, we need not recount it here. We affirm the district court. I The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Bowen’s motion to continue his sentencing hearing. A district court has “broad discretion” to grant or deny a continuance. United States v. Kloehn , 620 F.3d 1122, 1126 (9th Cir. 2010). Its decision “will not be disturbed on appeal absent clear abuse of that discretion.” Id. at 1126-27 (internal quotation marks omitted)
. The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying the motion for a continuance because Bowen had enough time to analyze the error found in Exhibit 299, and he did not specifically explain why a continuance would have been necessa ry given his familiarity with Exhibit 299 and the underlying shipping records. See United States v. Sarno , 73 F.3d 1470, 1493 (9th Cir. 1995) (Although “additional time can often be put to good use,” “general allegations that a continua nce would have allowed [the defendant] to prepare a better defense . . . are insufficient to allow [the Court] to find an abuse of discretion.”). II3 The district court did not abuse its discretion by declining to construe Bowen’s motion for continuance as a motion for a new trial. A “motion must state the grounds on which it is based and the relief or order sought.” F ED . R. C RIM . P. 47(b). Bowen clearly requested a continua nce of his sentencing, not a new trial. Indeed, Bowen’s motion in response to the government’s Notice of Errata was titled “Request for Continuance of Sentencing.”

AFFIRMED.
INTHESUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFMONTATIA„1;,tileaILYPR22-0004AUG232022INREPETITIONOFCHRISTOPHERJ.DAVISFORREINSTATEMENTTOACTIVESTATUSINTHEBAROFMONTANABowenGreenwoodClerkofSupremeCourtStateofMontanaORDERChristopherJ.DavishaspetitionedforreinstaternenttoactivestatusintheStateBarofMontana.DavisvoluntarilychoseinactivestatusonApril1,2003.DaviswasactiveinCaliforniaduringtheinterveningtimeperiod,butthatendedin2015.ItistheCourt'spracticeinsuchcases,giventheamountoftimesinceDavishasbeenonactivestatus,torequireacharacterandfitnessreviewandthecornpletionofcontinuingeducation.Therefore,ITISHEREBYORDEREDthatPetitionershallsubmittoaninvestigationconductedbytheComrnissiononCharacterandFitness,which,initsdiscretion,maybealirnitedinvestigation.PetitionershallcomplywiththecharacterandfitnessprocessandtimelyproduceinformationanddocumentationasrequestedbytheCommission.TheCommissionwillinvestigatePetitioner'scharacterandfitnessinaccordancewiththeRulesofProcedureoftheCornmissiononCharacterandFitness.TheCommissionwilladvisetheCourtwhetherthePetitionerhasbeencertified,conditionallycertified,ordeniedcertification.IftheCommissiondeniescertification,theCommissionwillissuewrittenfindingsoffact,conclusionsoflaw,andadecisionpursuanttoSection5(c)(6)oftheRulesofProcedureoftheCommissiononCharacterandFitness.IfthePetitioneriscertifiedorconditionallycertifiedbytheCommissiononCharacterandFitness,thePetitionershallbeadmittedtotheactivepracticeoflawinMontanauponpaymentofappropriateduesandfeesandpenaltiestotheStateBarofMontana.ITISFURTHERORDEREDthat,ifadmitted,withinsixmonthsofadmissiontotheactivepracticeoflaw,PetitionershallsubmittotheBoardofContinuingLegalEducation,P.O.Box577,Helena,MT59624,proofofattendanceatthirtyhoursof08/23/2022Case Number: PR 22-0004approved Continuing

Legal Education

to

be credited

to the time Petitioner

was

on inactive status.

This

may include approved

credits previously

obtained

by Petitioner

during

the

last two years,

if any. The Clerk

is directed

to provide

copies

of this order

to the Petitioner

and

the State Bar

of Montana. DATED

this

Z3

— day

of August,

2022.

Chief Justice L

A

w de &

4

' J

L Justices 2