alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-1873

In re: JOSEPH D. KEMP,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:19-cv-00080-TSK-MJA)

Submitted: March 31, 2022 Decided: April 13, 2022

Before THACKER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Joseph D. Kemp, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Joseph D. Kemp petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court 

has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals 

that, by order entered on December 28, 2021, the district court accepted the magistrate 

judge’s report and recommendation and denied the petition. Accordingly, because the 

district court has recently decided Kemp’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

PETITION DENIED
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 (COPANO ENERGY, L.L.C. LOGO)
    
    News Release
 Contacts:
    
    Matt Assiff, SVP & CFOCopano Energy, L.L.C.713-621-9547FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEAnne Pearson / apearson@drg-e.comJack Lascar / jlascar@drg-e.comDRG&E / 713-529-6600
 COPANO ENERGY INCREASES QUARTERLY CASH DISTRIBUTION
Twelfth Consecutive Increase Since IPO
# L_2015050DE.01004802.xml

| 21.2.2015 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 50/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.2.2015

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 50/48

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 1169/2011 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 25. Oktober 2011 betreffend die Information der Verbraucher über Lebensmittel und zur Änderung der Verordnungen (EG) Nr. 1924/2006 und (EG) Nr. 1925/2006 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates und zur Aufhebung der Richtlinie 87/250/EWG der Kommission, der Richtlinie 90/496/EWG des Rates, der Richtlinie 1999/10/EG der Kommission, der Richtlinie 2000/13/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates, der Richtlinien 2002/67/EG und 2008/5/EG der Kommission und der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 608/2004 der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 22. November 2011
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 304 vom 22. November 2011

Auf Seite 38, Artikel 44 Absatz 1 Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

| „b) | sind die Angaben gemäß den Artikeln 9 und 10 nicht verpflichtend, ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

sind die Angaben gemäß den Artikeln 9 und 10 nicht verpflichtend, ...“

muss es heißen:

| „b) | sind die anderen Angaben gemäß den Artikeln 9 und 10 nicht verpflichtend, ...“ |
| --- | --- |

„b)

sind die anderen Angaben gemäß den Artikeln 9 und 10 nicht verpflichtend, ...“

.

---
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    I, Marinus Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Software, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.    Date:  May 20, 2009  /s/ Marinus Jellema Marinus Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Pacific Software, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOTE NO:

Her Britannic Majesty's Embassy presents its compliments to the Department of State and has the honour to refer to the UK/US Air Services Agreement between the Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and

Northern Ireland and the Gover nment of the United States of America, signed at Bermuda on 23 July 1977, as amended.

Her Majesty’s Government hereby selects Dallas (in place of Orlando) as a US gateway point in column (C) on UK Route 9A in Section 3 of Annex 1 to the aforementioned Agr eement, and designates Cayman Airways Limited to operate scheduled combination air services between the Cay man Islands and the above point on UK Route 9A.

The Embassy avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Department of

State the assurance of its highest consideration.

BRITISH EMBASSY Washington DC

March 2012
EXHIBIT
32.1




WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Lihua International, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, Jianhua Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      November 16, 2009
            By:
            /s/
      Jianhua ZhuName:
            Jianhua
      ZhuTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                  PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

  I, Simon Westbrook, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
IN Media  Corporation's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  fiscal  quarter
ended  September 30, 2010 fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: November 12, 2010                    By: /s/ Simon Westbrook
                                               ---------------------------------
                                           Name:  Simon Westbrook
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
#### JACKSON v. STATE.

No. 17745.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1935.

S. F. -Rose, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of theft of one. head of cattle and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

We do not deem it necessary to state the testimony, which consists entirely of circumstances, because the judgment must be reversed on the argument of the district attorney in referring to appellant’s failure to testify. The bill of exception shows that appellant did not testify in the case; that the district attorney in his closing argument to the jury said: “And yet, neither Fred Jackson nor Oren Jackson has testified in this case and explained where the meat came from” (meaning the meat appellant had sold on Saturday following the Friday on which Bob Higgins lost a heifer). The appellant, by his attorney, objected to said argument because it was a direct reference to appellant’s failure to testify, to which the district attorney replied: “I made a mistake in saying Oren Jackson; I meant to say Onus Jackson.” The court orally instructed the jury not to consider the remark of the district attorney that Oren Jackson had not testified in the case, as such remark was improper. Thereupon the district attorney stated to the jury that he did not mean to say Oren Jackson, but intended to say Onus Jackson, a brother of defendant; that he made a mistake and was sorry he did. This was a clear violation of article 710, C. C. P. It is unfortunate that the district attorney made the mistake; nevertheless his statement had the same injurious effect and was as much a violation of said article of the Code of Criminal Procedure hereinabove referred to as if made intentionally. See Smith v. State, 106 Tex. Cr. R. 586, 294 S. W. 221.

For the error hereinabove pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
# L_2011328EN.01005801.xml

| 10.12.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 328/58 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 328/58

---

Corrigendum to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 404/2011 of 8 April 2011 laying down detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the Common Fisheries Policy

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 112 of 30 April 2011
  )

On page 18, Article 57(4):

for:

‘Member States that collect systematically on at least a monthly basis for each of their fishing vessels not subject to fishing logbook and landing requirements data:

| (a) | on all landings of catches of all species in kilogram, including zero landings; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

on all landings of catches of all species in kilogram, including zero landings;

| (b) | on the statistical rectangles where these catches where taken shall be considered to have met the requirement of a sampling plan as referred to in Article 56 of this Regulation.’, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

on the statistical rectangles where these catches where taken shall be considered to have met the requirement of a sampling plan as referred to in Article 56 of this Regulation.’,

read:

‘Member States shall be considered to have met the requirement of a sampling plan as referred to in Article 56 of this Regulation if they collect systematically on at least a monthly basis for each of their fishing vessels not subject to fishing logbook and landing declaration requirements data:

| (a) | on all landings of catches of all species in kilogram, including zero landings; |
| --- | --- |

(a)

on all landings of catches of all species in kilogram, including zero landings;

| (b) | on the statistical rectangles where these catches were taken.’; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

on the statistical rectangles where these catches were taken.’;

on page 88, Annex XIII, species ‘Anglerfish’, third line (GUH):

for:

‘GUH 3,04’,

read:

‘GUH 3,00’;

on page 92, Annex XIII, species ‘European plaice’, second line (GUT):

for:

‘GUT 1,07’,

read:

‘GUT 1,05’;

on page 98, Annex XV, species ‘Cod’, seventh line (SAD):

for:

‘SAD’,

read:

‘CBF’;

on page 101, Annex XV, species ‘Atlantic redfishes’, third line (GUH):

for:

‘GUH 1,88’,

read:

‘GUH 1,78’.

---
(logo)LNR

          Partners, LLC

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw,being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the “Special Servicer”), as specialservicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for thetransactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject toany limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, onbehalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officerof the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1.            A review ofthe activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencingon January 1, 2019 and ending on December 31, 2019 (or any other shorter periodset forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “'Reporting Period”), and of theSpecial Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement hasbeen made under my supervision; and

 

2.            To the bestof my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicingcriteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilledall of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement inall material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liabilitycompany

 

 

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 20, 2020

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue • Suite 700 • Miami Beach,Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 • Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

 

**Schedule I**

 

 

MSBAM 2012-C6

Morgan Stanley Bank of AmericaMerrill Lynch Trust 2012-C6, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,Series 2012-C6

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1221 Avenue of the Americas

New York NY 10020

James Y. Lee

 

Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York NY 10036

Stephen Holmes

 

Situs Holdings, LLC

5065 Westheimer 700 E

Houston TX 77027

Pete Larsen

 

Situs Holdings, LLC

2 Embarcadero, Suite 1300

San Francisco CA 94111

Stacey Ciarlanti

 

U.S. Bank, NationalAssociation

190 South LaSalle Street, 7thFloor

Att: MSBAM 2016-C6

Chicago IL 60603

General

 

U.S. Bank National AssociAtion

190 South LaSalle Street, 7thFloor

Chicago, IL 60603

Group Notices 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia MD 21045

Group Notices
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications**

I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of ML Chesapeake FuturesAccess LLC, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML Chesapeake FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, theperiods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date:  August 14,  2007             |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer                      |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

1

----
DISMISS and Opinion Filed May 13, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-21-01065-CV 

ELLIOT GIBBS, Appellant 

V. 

BRIGHTON BORROWER, LLC DBA 

LEXINGTON APARTMENT HOMES, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-04687-D 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Schenck, Osborne, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

We ordered this appeal submitted without the reporter’s record on March 14, 

2022, after appellant failed to comply with our directive to file written verification 

he had requested the record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c). In that same order, we 

directed appellant to file his brief by April 13, 2022. When appellant failed to file 

the brief by April 19, 2022, we directed appellant to file the brief within ten days 

and cautioned him that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. See 
 –2– 

id. 38.8(a)(1). To date, appellant has not filed his brief. Accordingly, we dismiss 

the appeal. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c). 

211065F.P05 

 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

ELLIOT GIBBS, Appellant 

No. 05-21-01065-CV V. 

BRIGHTON BORROWER, LLC 

DBA LEXINGTON APARTMENT 

HOMES, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at 

Law No. 4, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-21-04687-

D. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Smith, 

Justices Schenck and Osborne 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DISMISS the appeal. 

Judgment entered May 13, 2022.
(logo)****CURCIO

+COHEN

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

Managing Member

Park Bridge Lender ServicesLLC

New York, NY

 

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management’sReport on Assessment of 2016 Compliance by Park Bridge Lender Services LLC withRegulation AB Servicing Criteria (“Management’s Report”),that Park Bridge Lender Services LLC (the “Company”) complied withthe servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the U.S. Securities andExchange Commission’s Regulation AB as of and for the year ended December31, 2016, excluding those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A) within ExhibitB to Management’s Report. The transactions covered by this report areonly those transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trustadvisor or operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the“Platform”) identified in Management’s Report. ReferenceExhibit A to Management’s Report for the transactions covered by thisexamination. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance withthe applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinionon management’s assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting OversightBoard (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis,evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in thecircumstances. Our examination included testing of a selected sample of theservicing activities related to the Platform, determining whether the Companyperformed those selected activities in compliance with the applicable servicingcriteria during the specified period. Our procedures were limited to theselected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company duringthe period covered by this report. Our examination was not designed to detectmaterial noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurred prior to orsubsequent to our tests, that may have affected the Company’s servicingactivities during the period covered by this report. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination doesnot provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion,management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementionedapplicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit B to Management’sReport with respect to the transactions identified in Exhibit A toManagement’s Report as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, forthe Platform, is fairly stated in all material aspects.

 

 

/s/ Curcio & Cohen,CPA’s, P.C.

 

 

New York, NY

February 2, 2017

 

 

CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTSPC 7 PENN PLAZA, SUITE 1500 NEW YORK NY 10001

TEL: 212 557-9800  FAX:212 557 9819   WEBSITE: WWW.CWCCPAFIRM.COM
Exhibit 99              FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media Contact: Rose Bratton 281-406-2212August 17, 2007 Investor Contact: David Tucker 281-406-2370Parker Drilling Updates Kazakhstan Tax DisputeToday, Parker Drilling Company, a U.S. company and worldwide provider of drilling anddrilling-related services, announced that it has received an official letter from the Tax Committeeof the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Kazakhstan confirming that the Ministry of Financehas directed the Atyrau Tax Committee to stay enforcement of the notice of income tax assessmentagainst the Kazakhstan branch of a Parker subsidiary. The letter indicates that the stay wasissued in response to the appeal filed by the branch on the basis that collection of the assessmentwould result in double taxation to Parker Drilling.Mr. Robert L. Parker Jr., chairman and chief executive officer stated: “We are encouraged that theRepublic of Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Finance and the U.S. Government’s Department of the Treasuryare in contact at the highest level and have committed to resolving an important tax treaty matterthat affects foreign direct investment between Kazakhstani and American business partners. We lookforward to continuing our long-term commitment to working in Kazakhstan’s energy sector.”*This release contains certain statements that may be deemed to be “forward-looking statements”within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Allstatements, other than statements of historical facts, that address activities, events ordevelopments that the Company expects, projects, believes or anticipates will or may occur in thefuture, including statements regarding the resolution of the tax dispute, are forward- lookingstatements. Although the Company believes that its expectations stated in this release are basedon reasonable assumptions, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied inthe forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of thisrelease, and the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-lookingstatement.*