alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2846 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2846

        To extend the suspension of duty for certain chemicals.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2000

Mr. Rockefeller introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
        To extend the suspension of duty for certain chemicals.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION OF DUTY SUSPENSION.

    Subheading 9902.32.06 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the 
United States is amended by striking         ``12/31/2000'' and 
inserting ``12/31/2003''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3218 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3218

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 24, 2016

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 
    1221 State Street, Suite 12, Santa Barbara, California, as the 
  ``Special Warfare Operator Master Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis 
               `Lou' J. Langlais Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SPECIAL WARFARE OPERATOR MASTER CHIEF PETTY OFFICER (SEAL) 
              LOUIS ``LOU'' J. LANGLAIS POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 1221 State Street, Suite 12, Santa Barbara, California, 
shall be known and designated as the ``Special Warfare Operator Master 
Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis `Lou' J. Langlais Post Office 
Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Special 
Warfare Operator Master Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis `Lou' J. 
Langlais Post Office Building''.

            Passed the House of Representatives May 23, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:
July 20, 2007
    
    /s/ THOMAS W. POWELLThomas W. PowellChairman and Chief Executive Officer
 33
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Marc Kilbride, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CenterPoint Energy Transition BondCompany, LLC;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2007                                                    /s/ Marc Kilbride   Marc Kilbride   Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
#  Nuclear Nonproliferation

## Reducing nuclear risk

From the world’s first continuously operating nuclear reactor to follow-on discoveries over the years, ORNL has developed unparalleled nuclear infrastructure, operations, and knowledge. Today, we build on this legacy to deliver the full spectrum of scientific, technical, and operational solutions to nonproliferation challenges around the globe. 

### We're a multidisciplinary team

From materials science and analytical chemistry to data science and software development, our scientists and technical staff are highly skilled in the disciplines most needed to solve pressing nuclear nonproliferation challenges. We combine our expertise to develop and implement nuclear collection and detection technologies, advance scientific understanding of the nuclear fuel cycle, and strengthen international safeguards and nonproliferation regimes. We're passionate about reducing the risk of nuclear materials being used illicitly while enabling their secure, peaceful use in clean energy, medical, and industrial applications around the world.

Join us on the front lines of innovation

## Current Research

## News

Researchers publish first-of-its-kind database for uranium minerals 

## News

Naval officer receives 2023 Junior Scientist Officer of the Year award

## News

Finding simple solutions for complex national security challenges

## News

Cable-Dunlap, Chi, Smith and Thornton named ORNL Corporate Fellows
Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 17-305 Date: October 2017 

United States

Office of 

Personnel Management 

 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

 

 

Subject: 2018 FEHB Withholdings and Contributions

The official Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program withholdings and contribution 

rates for 2018 are available in a PDF file format on the OPM web site at 

http://www.opm.gov/insure/health/rates/index.asp. These are the only rates agency payroll 

providers should use to update their systems and are effective for pay periods beginning in 

calendar year 2018. 

The FEHB withholdings and contribution rates are also available in an ASCII and Excel file 

format. If you are a subscriber to the “FINPAY” listserv, you will receive these files. If you are 

not FINPAY subscriber, please email us at finance@opm.gov requesting “FEHB Rates” as the 

subject and the rate files will be emailed to you.

If you have questions about this letter, feel free to contact us at FinancialBALs@opm.gov or call 

202-606-0606. 

 

Tonya R. Johnson

Associate Chief Financial Officer

Financial Services
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D 20 2 3

- 2919 Lower Tribunal No. 2001031912

_____________________________
T IMOTHY B RYAN H ANDLEY , Appellant
,

v.

D EPARTMENT OF R EVENUE and S HERRI L A F ORSTE B ANNISTER , Appellee s

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Department of Revenue

. August 27, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

. TRAVER, C.J., and WOZNIAK and BROWNLEE , JJ., c oncur.

Nicole Benjamin, of Benjamin Law Firm, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

No A ppearance for Appellee
, Sherri LaForste Bannister.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
101FormofRentionLetterforGeorgiaHoldingsIncIndependentDirectors






[Date]
[Name of Board Chairman]
Chairman




[Name of Director]
[Address]


Dear [Director’s First Name],


I am pleased to confirm your appointment as a member of the Board of Directors of Georgia Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”).


As we have discussed, as consideration for your membership on the Company’s Board of Directors [and role as [insert any Committee roles]], you will receive total annual compensation of *$              beginning as of [Date] [, which includes *$                in annual compensation as a result of your role as Chairman of the Board’s [          ] Committee].   The above amount will be paid to you in four (4) equal quarterly installments on or about March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year for as long as you continue to serve on the Company’s Board of Directors [and as Chairman of the Board’s [           ] Committee].   In addition, in connection with your services to the Company’s Board of Directors you will be entitled to reimbursement of your travel and other incidental expenses relating to your attendance and participation in Board [and 
[          ] Committee] meetings, as reflected in receipts submitted by you. 


Further, you are being provided an opportunity to share in the Company’s financial success and, pursuant and subject to the enclosed Option Agreement, you will receive a stock option award to acquire up to [       ] shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $[     ] per share, which is the fair market value of the common stock as of today’s date.   


[Director’s First Name], I am delighted that you have joined our Board and I know that you will be a strong contributor to the Company’s success.  There will be many challenges ahead of us, and I am  confident that we have the talent and resources to help the Company attain its growth objectives. 


If the terms of your Board membership as outlined above are acceptable, please indicate by signing and dating below. You should return the signed letter to me, along with signed copies of the enclosed Option Agreement, by [Date].


Sincerely,


 
[Name of Board Chairman]




Signed and agreed to on this
_____day of ____________, [Year]       






__________________________________________
[Name of Director]
























*Board and Committee Retainer Fees: 
$60,000 per year for Board members 
$15,000 per year for serving as Chairman of the Audit Committee
# L_2011290DE.01000701.xml

| 9.11.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 290/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 290/7

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 574/2011 der Kommission vom 16. Juni 2011 zur Änderung des Anhangs I der Richtlinie 2002/32/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates hinsichtlich der Höchstgehalte für Nitrit, Melamin, Ambrosia spp. und der Verschleppung bestimmter Kokzidiostatika und Histomonostatika sowie zur Konsolidierung der Anhänge I und II derselben

Ambrosia

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 159 vom 17. Juni 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 159 vom 17. Juni 2011

Auf Seite 17, Anhang I Abschnitt V Fußnote 3 Satz 1:

anstatt:

„Für Frischfisch und andere Wassertiere, die direkt angeliefert und ohne Zwischenverarbeitung zur Erzeugung von Futtermitteln für Pelztiere verwendet werden, gilt der Höchstwert nicht; dagegen gelten Höchstwerte von 4,0 ng WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ/kg Produkt und 8,0 ng WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/kg Produkt für Frischfisch und von 25,0 ng WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/kg Produkt für Fischleber, die zur direkten Verfütterung an Pelztiere, Zoo- und Zirkustiere verwendet werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Für Frischfisch und andere Wassertiere, die direkt angeliefert und ohne Zwischenverarbeitung zur Erzeugung von Futtermitteln für Pelztiere verwendet werden, gilt der Höchstwert nicht; dagegen gelten Höchstwerte von 4,0 ng WHO-PCDD/F-TEQ/kg Produkt und 8,0 ng WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/kg Produkt für Frischfisch und von 25,0 ng WHO-PCDD/F-PCB-TEQ/kg Produkt für Fischleber, die zur direkten Verfütterung an Heimtiere, Zoo- und Zirkustiere oder als Futtermittel-Ausgangserzeugnis für die Herstellung von Heimtierfuttermitteln verwendet werden.“

---
# Projects

## Filter Projects

### Area of Research

            - Computational Engineering
            - Computer Science
            - Data
            - Earth Sciences
            - Knowledge Discovery
            - Materials
            - Materials for Computing
            - National Security
            - Nuclear Science and Technology
            - Quantum information Science
            - Supercomputing

### Date

            - 2021
            - 2018
            - 2017
            - 2016
            - 2015
            - 2011

## Predicting Ice Sheet and Climate Evolution at Extreme Scales (PISCEES)

Jun 1, 2016

## Multiscale Methods for Accurate, Efficient, and Scale-Aware Models of the Earth System

Jun 1, 2016

## A Dynamical Pathway toward Understanding, Modeling and Predicting Energy and Water Cycle Extremes 

Jun 1, 2016

## Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) from ACME

Jun 1, 2016

## Thermodynamic limits to the scalability of cold qubits

Oct 1, 2015

## Timing Authentication Secured by Quantum Correlations (TASQC)

Jan 1, 2015

## Piranha

## Situ

Oct 1, 2016

## Stucco

Oct 1, 2016

## ORCA

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast »
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 275

For the relief of Suchada Kwong.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1999

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Suchada Kwong.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SUCHADA

4 KWONG.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Suchada Kwong shall be eligible for issuance of an

8 immigrant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an

9 alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon fil10 ing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under

11 section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to

12 lawful permanent resident.
2

S 275 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Suchada Kwong

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), she shall be considered to have en4 tered and remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible,

5 be eligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of

6 the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the

7 enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plications for issuance of immigrant visas or the applica11 tions for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

12 fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this

13 Act.

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Suchada Kwong, the Secretary of State shall in17 struct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the cur18 rent or next following fiscal year, the total number of im19 migrant visas that are made available to natives of the

20 country of the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the

21 Immigration and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the

22 total number of immigrant visas that are made available

23 to natives of the country of the alien’s birth under section

24 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
1

Filed 2/18/22 P. v. Sarwar CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for 

publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication 

or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Yolo)

----

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

ROHAIL SARWAR,

Defendant and Appellant.

C092711

(Super. Ct. No. CRF 2018-

4967)

Appointed counsel for defendant Rohail Sarwar has asked this court to conduct an 

independent review of the record to determine whether there are any arguable issues on 

appeal. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) Finding no arguable error in 

defendant’s favor, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

On August 21, 2018, defendant killed Junying Lu by stabbing her about 20 times 

in the head, abdomen, and hands. (People v. Sarwar (Oct. 26, 2021, C090687) [nonpub. 
2

opn.].)1 A jury found defendant guilty of murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a))2 with the 

enhancements that defendant intentionally killed Lu by means of lying in wait (§ 190.2, 

subd. (a)(15)), that the murder was committed during the commission or attempted 

commission of a burglary (§ 190.2, subd. (a)(17)), and that defendant personally used a 

deadly weapon (§ 12022, subd. (b)(1)). The jury also found defendant guilty of assault 

against another victim with intent to commit mayhem, rape, sodomy, or oral copulation 

(§ 220, subd. (a)). Defendant was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole plus 

seven years. We affirmed defendant’s conviction on appeal.

On August 6, 2020, while defendant’s direct appeal was pending, the trial court 

held a victim restitution hearing. After considering the prosecutor’s brief, the 

prosecutor’s supporting evidence, and argument by both sides, the trial court ordered 

defendant pay a total restitution amount of $256,273.23 to Lu’s family for loss of 

financial support for a 10-year period, funeral costs, and other related expenses.

Defendant timely appealed.

DISCUSSION

Counsel filed an opening brief that sets forth the facts and procedural history of 

the case and requests this court to review the record and determine whether there are any 

arguable issues on appeal. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436.) Defendant was 

advised by counsel of his right to file a supplemental brief within 30 days from the date 

the opening brief was filed. More than 30 days have elapsed, and defendant has not filed 

a supplemental brief. Our review of the record pursuant to Wende has disclosed no 

arguable errors in defendant’s favor.

1 On our own motion, we take judicial notice of this prior decision. (Evid. Code, § 452, 

subd. (d).)

2 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.
3

DISPOSITION

The judgment is affirmed.

 /s/

HOCH, J.

We concur:

 /s/

BLEASE, Acting P. J.

 /s/

ROBIE, J.
Exhibit 31.1

**SARBANES-OXLEY SECTION 302(a) CERTIFICATION**

I, Shawn Englmann, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009 of Belvedere Resources Corporation.

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition results  and cash flows of the registrant as of, and  for the periods presented in this report.

4.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

5.

I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  July 30, 2009

*“Shawn Englmann”*