alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 17419.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 27, 1935.

Rehearing Denied April 3, 1935.

Geppert, Geppert & Yictery, of Teague, for appellant.

■ Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of possessing for the purpose of sale spirituous liquor capable of producing intoxication, and his punishment was assessed *759at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record is before ns without a statement of facts or hills of exceptions. No defect either in the indictment or in the procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. ■

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the'judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
JOSEPH A. DEJOIE, IV

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5118

___ __________________________/

Opinion filed March 4, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. T. Michael Jones , Judge

.

Michael R. Rollo, Pensacola , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assis tant Attorney

General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
Oak Ridge National Laboratory delivers scientific discoveries and technical breakthroughs needed to realize solutions in energy and national security and provide economic benefit to the nation.

## Mission

### Scientific Discovery

### Clean Energy

### National Security

As the largest Department of Energy science and energy laboratory, ORNL engages in diverse research activities that support the department’s mission of ensuring America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy, environmental and security challenges.

## Science Areas

Biology and EnvironmentAdvancing understanding of complexity in biological and environmental systemsMaterialsConducting foundational science in chemistry, materials science, nanoscience, and physicsClean EnergyDelivering breakthroughs for a clean, efficient, secure energy futureNational SecuritySolving critical challenges in cybersecurity, nuclear security, and human securityFusion and FissionDelivering world-leading nuclear science and engineeringNeutron ScienceAnswering big science questions about the fundamental nature of materials at atomic scaleIsotopesAdvancing isotope science and processing for a healthy, secure, and sustainable futureSupercomputingAdvancing computing and data capabilities for scientific discovery and continued U.S. technological leadership

From the earliest days of Manhattan Project, ORNL has focused on translational science, where basic and applied research work together to facilitate and accelerate use-inspired fundamental science and science-driven technology development.

The nation’s economic future depends on a vibrant science and technology infrastructure that supports industries that can compete globally as they take discoveries from the laboratory to the marketplace.

## User Facilities

ORNL hosts world-class scientific user facilities that are available to researchers from universities, industry, and other institutions. These unique facilities offer a diverse set of tools for experiments across a range of fields, including biology, materials and energy sciences, physics, engineering, and chemistry.

                Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences              

                Carbon Fiber Technology Facility              

                Manufacturing Demonstration Facility              

                Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility              

                High Flux Isotope Reactor              

                Building Technologies Research and Integration Center              

                National Transportation Research Center              

                Spallation Neutron Source
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Bernard J. Duroc-DannerName: Bernard J. Duroc-DannerTitle: Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 3, 2007
exhibit1016.htm







  





Page 1 of 10











  






 







  





Page 2 of 10











  






 







  





Page 3 of 10











  






 







  





Page 4 of 10











  






 







  





Page 5 of 10











  






 







  





Page 6 of 10











  






 







  





Page 7 of 10











  






 







  





Page 8 of 10











  






 







  





Page 9 of 10











  






 







  





Page 10 of 10
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**STATEMENT
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE**








Pursuant
      to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, John
      L.
      Petersen, Chief Financial Officer of Stirling Acquisition Corporation (the
      "Company"), hereby certifies that:





The
      Company's Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ended June 30, 2008 (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/ John
              L.
              PetersenJohn
                L. Petersen, Chief Financial OfficerDated:
                August 14, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82671]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23575]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20699 and #20700; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-
20012]


Presidential Declaration Amendment of a Major Disaster for the 
State of Florida

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Amendment 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a 
major disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4828-DR), dated September 
28, 2024.

DATES: Issued on October 3, 2024.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: November 27, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: June 30, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of the President's major disaster 
declaration for the State of Florida, dated September 28, 2024, is 
hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by 
the disaster:
    Incident: Hurricane Helene.
    Incident Period: September 23, 2024 and continuing.

Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans): Gulf.
Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):
    Florida: Bay, Calhoun.

    All other information in the original declaration remains 
unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & 
Resilience.
[FR Doc. 2024-23575 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geovic Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Sherborne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|                        |  |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John E. Sherborne                    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | John E. Sherborne Chief Executive
Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

# AGENCY:

Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries

# ACTION:

Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries gives notice of a closed teleconference meeting of the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held on November 1, 2024, from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. (ET).

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Elizabeth Van Osten, Designated Federal Officer, Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations, at (202) 317-3648 or                         *elizabeth.j.vanosten@irs.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the Advisory Committee on Actuarial Examinations will hold a teleconference meeting on November 1, 2024, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (ET). The meeting will be closed to the public.

The purpose of the meeting is to discuss topics and questions that may be recommended for inclusion on future Joint Board examinations in actuarial mathematics, pension law and methodology referred to in 29 U.S.C. 1242(a)(1)(B).

A determination has been made as required by section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), that the subject of the meeting falls within the exception to the open meeting requirement set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(9)(B), and that the public interest requires that such meeting be closed to public participation.

Dated: October 10, 2024.

Thomas V. Curtin, Jr.,

Executive Director, Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries.

[FR Doc. 2024-23910 Filed 10-15-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 10.14


 



RESOLUTIONS OF THE


BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF SOUND COMMUNITY BANK












WHEREAS, Sound Community Bank and Laurie Stewart entered into a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan Agreement dated December 30, 2011 (the "2011 SERP");


WHEREAS, the definition of "Separation from Service" under Section 1.12 of the 2011 SERP does not fully comply with the definition of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the regulations thereunder (collectively, the "Code");


WHEREAS, the Bank has intended from the date the 2011 SERP was adopted that the definition of Separation from Service contained therein fully comply with Section 409A of the Code; and


WHEREAS, the Bank desires to clarify the definition of Separation from Service in the 2011 SERP by having such definition revised as set forth in the Amendment No. 1 to the 2011 SERP ("SERP Amendment"), the form of which is attached hereto.


NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the SERP Amendment, in the form attached hereto, be and hereby is approved and adopted; and be it further


RESOLVED, that the Chairman of the Board be and hereby is authorized to execute the SERP Amendment on behalf of the Bank, and the execution by the Chairman of the Board of the SERP Amendment shall conclusively establish his authority therefore from the Bank; and be it further


RESOLVED, that the Chief Executive Officer or her designees be and hereby are authorized and directed to take any and all actions necessary or appropriate to effectuate the aforementioned resolution, including such filings or notices that the Bank may be required to make with the


 Internal Revenue Service, and any actions previously taken by such officers in furtherance of the foregoing be and hereby are approved and ratified in all respects.
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6229 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6229

**Commission Decision of 07/07/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6229 - PAG / MITSUI / AMT JV) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 07/07/2011

C(2011) 5071

PUBLIC VERSION |

|

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE |

|To the notifying parties |

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6229 - PAG/ MITSUI/ AMT JV Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 01 June 2011, the European Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 by which the undertakings Mitsui & Co., Ltd. ("Mitsui", Japon) and Penske Automotive Group, Inc. ("PAG", USA) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the Company Alliance Motor Tyumen ("AMT", Russia) by way of purchase of shares. [2]

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for Mitsui: the sale, distribution, purchase, marketing and supply of products in business areas such as: iron and steel; non-ferrous metals; machinery; electronics; chemicals; energy-related commodities; and foods and retail, lifestyle and consumer service, and the sale of motor vehicles and motorcycles, and motor vehicle and motorcycle parts and accessories globally.

- for PAG : car retailing business, selling new and used vehicles, maintenance and repair services and the sale and placement of higher-margin products, such as third-party finance and insurance products, third-party extended service contracts and replacement and aftermarket automotive products.

- for AMT: the sale, maintenance and repair of Lexus motor vehicles.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (Signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 174, 15.06.2011, p.13.

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 00-4671

ALBERT GARY TAYLOR, a/k/a

Aldoc00l,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria.

Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CR-00-127)

Submitted: March 16, 2001

Decided: March 27, 2001

Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Thomas C. Carter, CARTER & KRAMER, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Michael

E. Rich, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Albert Gary Taylor was convicted by a jury on one count of traveling interstate to engage in sexual relations with a juvenile, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) (1994), and two counts of using a facility of

interstate commerce to entice a juvenile to engage in sexual activity

for which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) (1994). He was sentenced to seventy-one

months imprisonment. We affirm. 

On appeal, Taylor challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to

sustain the convictions on all three counts. Specifically, with respect

to the first count, Taylor maintains that the jury improperly rejected

his entrapment defense. As to the remaining two counts, Taylor

argues that he did not know and could not have known the age of the

girls in question, and therefore the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the convictions. 

This Court reviews a jury verdict for sufficiency of the evidence by

determining whether there is substantial evidence, when viewed in a

light most favorable to the Government, to support the verdict.

Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). In evaluating the

sufficiency of the evidence, this Court does not review the credibility

of the witnesses and assumes that the jury resolved all contradictions

in the testimony in favor of the government. United States v. Romer,

148 F.3d 359, 364 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1141

(1999).

We have reviewed the briefs and materials submitted in the joint

appendix and find sufficient evidence to support the convictions. We

further reject Taylor’s claims on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Taylor’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

2 UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR
materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

UNITED STATES v. TAYLOR 3
October 2, 2015

Mr. Mark Werle

251 West Central Avenue, #270

Springboro, OH 45066

Dear Mr. Werle:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your exemption request filed in Docket No. FAA−2015−2769 on July 7, 2015, 

but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition does not comply with the 

requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must 

send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.
2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 20173.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

Harvey W. Lindsay, of Dallas,- for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being twelve years in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2



CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Immune Therapeutics, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December
31, 2019 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Peter Aronstam,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
    and                   
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                             
| | (2) | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Date:
    August 28, 2020 | By: | /s/
    Peter Aronstam     
|------------------------- | --- | ---------------------------
|                          |     | Peter
    Aronstam         
|                          |     | Chief
    Financial Officer