alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# L_2012247EN.01001701.xml

| 13.9.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 247/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.9.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 247/17

---

Corrigendum to Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 on the provision of food information to consumers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1924/2006 and (EC) No 1925/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Directive 87/250/EEC, Council Directive 90/496/EEC, Commission Directive 1999/10/EC, Directive 2000/13/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, Commission Directives 2002/67/EC and 2008/5/EC and Commission Regulation (EC) No 608/2004

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 304 of 22 November 2011
  )

On page 57, Annex X, last indent of point 1(d):

for:

| ‘— | chewing gums and similar chewing products,’ |
| --- | --- |

‘—

chewing gums and similar chewing products,’

read:

| ‘— | chewing gums and similar chewing products.’. |
| --- | --- |

‘—

chewing gums and similar chewing products.’.

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83070]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20729; IDAHO Disaster Number ID-20011 
Declaration of Economic Injury]


Administrative Declaration of an Economic Injury Disaster for the 
State of Idaho

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) 
declaration for the State of Idaho dated October 7, 2024.

DATES: Issued on October 7, 2024.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: July 7, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov to 
apply for a disaster assistance loan.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vanessa Morgan, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's EIDL declaration, applications for disaster loans 
may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal https://lending.sba.gov or other locally announced locations. Please contact 
the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#aacec3d9cbd9decfd8c9dfd9dec5c7cfd8d9cfd8dcc3c9cfead9c8cb84cdc5dc"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="44202d372537302136273137302b292136372136322d2721043726256a232b32">[email protected]</span></a> or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for 
further assistance.
    Incident: Wildfires, including the Bench Lake and Wapiti Fires.
    Incident Period: July 11, 2024 and continuing.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Custer.
Contiguous Counties:
    Idaho: Blaine, Boise, Butte, Elmore, Lemhi, Valley

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit        4.000
 Available Elsewhere.........................................
Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere..      3.250
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for economic injury is 207290.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration is IDAHO.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2024-23682 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT  32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of ENHANCE SKIN PRODUCTS INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Brian LukianDate: September 14, 2011

Brian LukianChief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Online Shipping Holdings
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      May 12, 2010
              By:
              /s/ Jing YanName:
              Jing
      YanTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Principal Financial
                and
      Accounting Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
SHARE

# John Gearhart

              -  Fact Sheets 
              -  Timeline of ORNL Science 
              -  Leadership Team 
              -  Interactive Map 
              -  Diversity 
              -  Organization 
              -  Who we are, aren't 
              -  Community Engagement 
              -  History 
              -  Honors and Awards 
              -  Environmental Protection 
              -  Quality (ISO9001) 
              -  Research Integrity 
              -  Working at ORNL 

John Gearhart

## **Director, Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality**

John Gearhart is the director of Environment, Safety, Health, and Quality (ESH&Q) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. In this position, he leads the safety and operational infrastructure that enables the laboratory’s science missions while protecting workers, the public, and the environment. ESH&Q provides broad expertise and programs to support nuclear safety, promote occupational health, control work hazards, meet regulatory requirements, manage waste responsibly, and ensure quality performance. 

Gearhart previously served as the chief operating officer for ORNL’s Isotope Science and Engineering Directorate, providing oversight to nuclear and radiological facilities with critical national missions, including the production of medical isotopes and fuel for deep space exploration.

Prior to joining ORNL, he was the assistant chief of Naval Research at the Office of Naval Research, where he led the management and operations functions for the U.S. Navy’s scientific research and development portfolio.

Gearhart is a U.S. Navy nuclear submarine veteran with 30 years of experience in the Department of Defense in operations, management, risk assessment, long-range planning, and strategy implementation. Throughout his naval career, he served in multiple positions, including as a nuclear submarine quality assurance officer, ensuring highly reliable safety systems in equipment. He holds a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Oklahoma State University and a master’s in business administration from the University of Phoenix.
#### HACKETT v. STATE.

No. 14738.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 21, 1931.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 18, 1931.

Clegg *&*Clegg, of Trinity, and M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year and one day. .

 The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented' for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

DATTIMORE, J.

The first ground of the rehearing is that there should be some particularity of description of the liquor possessed by appellant. In Tucker v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 505, 251 S. W. 1090, we held an indictment sufficient which charged merely that the accused possessed liquor capable of producing intoxication. The case has been followed many times since. We are still of opinion this is a sufficient description of the liquor.

This court has often held that whisky is liquor capable of próducing intoxication, and that it is not error to so tell the jury in the charge of the court. Landers v. State, 85 Tex. Cr. R. 109, 210 S. W. 694. There are many authorities to the same effect.

*113We think it entirely proper for the court to tell the jury in the charge that in considering the case before them they should not discuss facts not in evidence, and to tell them that no juryman should disclose to his fellows any facts known to him which were not in evidence, and that to do so would subject said juror to punishment for contempt, and that the case must be decided solely on the evidence before them and the law as given in the charge of the court.

Being unable to agree with appellant’s contentions, the motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                          
|---- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1050-084, 8th Floor 401 South Tryon St.
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial
Mortgages Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A.,
as Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series CGCMT 2012-GC8 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms
used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I,
Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2018.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 (AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Skreem Entertainment Corp. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Karen Pollino, Principal Financial Officer certify to my knowledge and in my capacity as an officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and,



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.



Date: August 20, 2008



| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ Karen Pollino          
| | Karen Pollino              
| | Principal Financial Officer



The foregoing certification is provided solely for purposes of complying with the provisions of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 269 Placed on Calendar Senate (PCS)]

                                                         Calendar No. 9
106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 269

To state the policy of the United States regarding the deployment of a 
missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United 
            States against limited ballistic missile attack.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1999

Mr. Cochran (for himself and Mr. Inouye) introduced the following bill; 
                     which was read the first time

                            January 22, 1999

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To state the policy of the United States regarding the deployment of a 
missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United 
            States against limited ballistic missile attack.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``National Missile Defense Act of 
1999''.

SEC. 2. NATIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE POLICY.

    It is the policy of the United States to deploy as soon as is 
technologically possible an effective National Missile Defense system 
capable of defending the territory of the United States against limited 
ballistic missile attack (whether accidental, unauthorized, or 
deliberate).
                                     

                                                         Calendar No. 9

106th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 269

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To state the policy of the United States regarding the deployment of a 
missile defense system capable of defending the territory of the United 
            States against limited ballistic missile attack.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            January 22, 1999

            Read the second time and placed on the calendar
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

November 8, 2019

izm 

# Order

Clerk November 8, 2019

160364 ( 21 )

DARRYL MCGORE,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v SC: 160364

CoA: 350293

CALUMET STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT

and BARAGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR,

Defendants

- Appelle es.

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, A ppellant ’s motion for reconsideration of the October

25 , 2019 order is denied because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously.

Within 21 days of the date of this order, Appellant shall submit a copy of the October 25,

2019 order and refile a copy of the pleadings as ordered. Failure to comply with this order

shall result in the dismissal of this application

.
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00071-CR

JARED FORD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from Criminal District Court No. 1

of Tarrant County (1527494R)

April 4, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s murder judgment. We affirm that 

judgment. But we hold that there was error in the trial court’s aggravated-robbery

judgment. Accordingly, we modify the trial court’s aggravated-robbery judgment to 

reflect a sentence of ten years’ confinement. As modified, we affirm the trial court’s 

aggravated-robbery judgment.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 26, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Blockchain Security Standards Council, Inc., (“BSSC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Anchor Labs, Inc., DBA Anchorage Digital, San Francisco, CA; Figment, Inc., Toronto, CANADA; and Ribbit Capital, New York, NY, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and BSSC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On July 9, 2024, BSSC filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on September 26, 2024 (89 FR 78902).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-23656 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
#### F. S. Miller, Appellant, v. Economy Hog & Cattle Powder Company, Appellee.

No. 45956.

June 16, 1942.

Fisher & Fisher, for appellant.

C. R. Barnes and M. C. Hamiel, for appellee.

Garfield, J.

This is the second appeal of this case. See Miller v. Economy Hog & Cattle Powder Co., 228 Iowa 626, 293 N. W. 4. The trial from which plaintiff has taken this appeal resulted in a verdict for defendant. The appeal was perfected on August 11, 1941. Appellant’s abstract was filed in this court on February 9, 1942. Appellee filed its motion under section 12848, Code, 1939, to dismiss or affirm because *1370the abstract was not filed within 120 days after the appeal was perfected, as required by section 12847. Appellant has filed no resistance to the motion, which was ordered submitted with the case. Appellee’s motion must be sustained.

Code section 12847, requiring the abstract to be filed within 120 days, is mandatory and must be complied with in order to invoke the jurisdiction of this court. While we have authority to waive our own rules under proper circumstances, we are not authorized to waive a statutory requirement such as this. No extension of time within which to file the abstract was asked for or' granted. The abstract was not filed until about six months after the appeal was perfected. Some of the cases which support our conclusion are: Herrold v. Herrold, 226 Iowa. 805, 808, 285 N. W. 274; Waterloo Sav. Bk. v. Town of Redfield, 213 Iowa 871, 236 N. W. 61; Coggon St. Bk. v. Woods, 212 Iowa 1388, 238 N. W. 448; Farmers St. Sav. Bk. v. Miles, 206 Iowa 766, 768, 221 N. W. 449; Botna Valley St. Bk. v. Cary, 205 Iowa 913, 218 N. W. 926.

We may add that, for reasons which need not be mentioned, we have carefully considered the merits of the appeal. Five of the six assigned errors complain of the instructions to the jury. We find no reversible error in the instructions in any of the respects charged. The remaining assignment of error challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict. A review of the evidence discloses that the verdict has sufficient support.

Appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal is sustained. — Appeal dismissed.

All Justices concur.