Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 16, 2024 / Notices 83547 

information that they believe is relevant 

to inform the agency as it seeks to 

conduct the next phase of research into 

State PDO data collection practices. 

(1) How does your State/jurisdiction 

determine if a crash report came from a 

sworn law enforcement officer or from 

a non-sworn officer? 

a. Ideally, this would be a data 

element in the crash report database 

showing the type of person who 

generated the report/data. If there are 

codes for sworn officer, non-sworn 

officer, and citizen (involved party), that 

would answer this question and 

Question #3 as well. However, having 

the indicator for sworn or non-sworn is 

important for this first question. Does 

your crash database include a data 

element that supports this? 

b. Officer badge number could be a 

second possible way to differentiate 

crash reports from sworn- versus nonsworn officers. Do you have badge 

numbers in the crash report/crash 

database and badge number lists 

identifying the type of officer (sworn 

versus non-sworn)? 

c. Can you provide information on 

any training differences for sworn 

versus non-sworn officers related to 

their crash reporting processes, 

knowledge, or duties? 

(2) Can your State supply summary 

statistics of crash data surrounding the 

most recent change in the crash 

reporting threshold (i.e., the frequency 

of crashes before and after the change)? 

a. We are most concerned with 

threshold changes in the past 15 years 

(i.e., 2009 or more recent). We would 

hope to get the frequency of crashes for 

each KABCO severity for 5 years before 

and after the change. If your State 

changed its threshold in 2009, for 

example, we would ask for data from 

two periods: 2004 to 2008, and 2009 to 

2013. Based on that example, can your 

system supply summary statistics of 

crash data for the period 5 years before 

and 5 years after the last threshold 

change? 

b. If the reporting threshold change 

took place mid-year (rather than on 

January 1st), we would need to know 

the implementation date for the change. 

In that case, we would like to receive 

the frequency of crashes for the year the 

change took place plus data for 5 years 

before and 5 years after the change (11 

years’ data total, including the change 

year). Can your system provide data to 

meet that request? 

c. If it has been fewer than 5 years 

since your most recent threshold 

change, can you provide any available 

post-change crash frequency data and 

can we also obtain the crash frequency 

for 5 years before that change? 

d. If there has been more than one 

change in threshold in the past 15 years, 

can you please describe the before- and 

after-change periods for each of the 

successive threshold changes and tell us 

if crash frequency data would be 

available for those periods? 

(3) Does your State use citizen/driver 

report forms for crash reporting? 

a. How does your State collect the 

data from crash-involved persons? 

b. How is the data from these reports 

stored? Specifically, is it added to the 

statewide crash database and, if so, are 

those reports tagged in some way to 

indicate that the data comes from a 

citizen/driver report? 

c. How is the data from citizen/driver 

reports used? Specifically, is it used in 

safety analyses and, if so, which types 

of analyses (e.g., safety analyses of 

locations, analyses of driver 

contributing factors, indications of belt 

use, other)? 

d. If a crash results in both a report 

written by a law enforcement officer 

(sworn or non-sworn) and a citizen 

report, are both versions stored in the 

statewide crash database? Are both used 

in safety analyses? Are the data blended 

from both sources (and if so, how)? 

This notice is for information 

purposes only. The agency will review 

and consider information provided in 

response to this notice as it conducts the 

next phase of research into State PDO 

data collection practices but will not 

respond to comments. 

Chou-Lin Chen, 

Associate Administrator for the National 

Center for Statistics and Analysis. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23099 Filed 10–15–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–59–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Office of Foreign Assets Control 

[Docket No.: OFAC–2024–0005] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities; Proposed Collection; 

Comment Request for Rough 

Diamonds Control Regulations 

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets 

Control, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Department of the 

Treasury, as part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork and respondent 

burden, invites the general public and 

other Federal agencies to comment on 

proposed or continuing information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. 

Currently, the Office of Foreign Assets 

Control (OFAC) within the Department 

of the Treasury is soliciting comments 

concerning OFAC’s information 

collection requirements contained 

within OFAC’s Rough Diamonds 

Control Regulations. 

DATES: Written comments must be 

submitted on or before December 16, 

2024 to be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments 

via the following methods: 

Federal eRulemaking Portal: 

www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions on the website for 

submitting comments. Refer to Docket 

Number OFAC–2024–0005. 

Email: OFACreport@treasury.gov with 

Attn: Request for Comments (Rough 

Diamonds Control Regulations). 

Instructions: All submissions received 

must include the agency name and refer 

to Docket Number OFAC–2024–0005 

and the Office of Management and 

Budget (OMB) control number 1505– 

0198. All comments, including 

attachments and other supporting 

materials, will become part of the public 

record and subject to public disclosure. 

Sensitive personal information, such as 

account numbers or Social Security 

numbers, should not be included. 

Comments generally will not be edited 

to remove any identifying or contact 

information. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Assistant Director for Licensing, 202– 

622–2480; Assistant Director for 

Regulatory Affairs, 202–622–4855; 

Assistant Director for Compliance, 202– 

622–2490 or https://ofac.treasury.gov/ 

contact-ofac. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Rough Diamonds Control 

Regulations. 

OMB Number: 1505–0198. 

Type of Review: Extension without 

change of a currently approved 

collection. 

Description: The collections of 

information are contained in section 

592.301(a)(3) of OFAC’s Rough 

Diamonds Control Regulations. The 

person identified as the ultimate 

consignee on the Customs Form 7501 

Entry Summary or its electronic 

equivalent is required to report that 

person’s receipt of a shipment of rough 

diamonds to the relevant foreign 

exporting authority within 15 calendar 

days of the date that the shipment 

arrived at the U.S. port of entry. 

Forms: Section 592.301(a)(3) states 

that the report filed by the ultimate 

consignee need not be in any particular 

form and may be submitted 

electronically or by mail or courier. 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
83548 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 200 / Wednesday, October 16, 2024 / Notices 

Affected Public: Business 

organizations and individuals engaged 

in the international diamond trade. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

Based on data received from the U.S. 

Department of Homeland Security 

(DHS), U.S. Customs and Border 

Protection (CBP), the estimate for the 

number of unique reporting respondents 

is approximately 73 respondents per 

year. 

Frequency of Response: The estimated 

annual frequency of responses is 

approximately 5.5 per respondent, 

based on average transaction volume. 

Estimated Total Number of Annual 

Responses: The estimated total number 

of responses per year is approximately 

402. 

Estimated Time Per Response: DHS/ 

CBP assesses that there is an average 

time estimate of 10 minutes per 

response. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: The estimated total annual 

reporting burden is approximately 67 

hours. 

Request for Comments 

Comments submitted in response to 

this notice will be summarized and 

included in the request for OMB 

approval. All comments will become a 

matter of public record. Comments are 

invited on: (a) whether the collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

agency, including whether the 

information has practical utility; (b) the 

accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the 

burden of the collection of information; 

(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, 

and clarity of the information to be 

collected; (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information 

on respondents, including through the 

use of automated collection techniques 

or other forms of information 

technology; and (e) estimates of capital 

or start-up costs and costs of operation, 

maintenance, and purchase of services 

required to provide information. 

Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. 

Lisa M. Palluconi, 

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets 

Control. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23729 Filed 10–15–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–AL–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Internal Revenue Service Advisory 

Council; Renewal of Charter 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service, 

Department of Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal. 

SUMMARY: The Charter for the Internal 

Revenue Service Advisory Council 

(IRSAC), has been renewed for two 

years beginning September 30, 2024, in 

accordance with the Federal Advisory 

Committee Act (FACA). 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Anna Millikan at (202) 317–6564 or 

send an email to publicliaison@irs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is 

hereby given that the charter for the 

Internal Revenue Service Advisory 

Council (IRSAC) has been renewed for 

two years beginning September 30, 

2024, in accordance with the Federal 

Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 

U.S.C. 1001–1014. 

The purpose of the IRSAC is to 

provide an organized public forum for 

discussion of relevant tax 

administration issues between Internal 

Revenue Service (IRS) officials and 

representatives of the public. 

The IRSAC proposes enhancements to 

IRS operations; recommends 

administrative and policy changes to 

improve taxpayer experience and 

service, compliance and tax 

administration; discusses relevant 

information reporting issues; addresses 

matters concerning tax-exempt and 

government entities; conveys the 

public’s perception of professional 

standards and best practices for tax 

professionals; and advises on fairness in 

tax administration. 

Conveying the public’s perception of 

IRS activities to Internal Revenue 

Service officials, the IRSAC is 

comprised of individuals representing a 

cross-section of the taxpaying public 

with substantial, disparate experience in 

tax preparation for individuals, small 

businesses and/or large, multi-national 

corporations; information reporting; taxexempt and government entities; digital 

services; and professional standards of 

tax professionals. 

Dated: October 8, 2024. 

John A. Lipold, 

Designated Federal Official, C&L Office of 

National Public Liaison, Internal Revenue 

Service. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23648 Filed 10–15–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4830–01–P 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Internal Revenue Service 

Proposed Collection; Comment 

Request for Form 2587 

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), 

Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: The Internal Revenue Service, 

as part of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on information 

collections, as required by the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The 

IRS is soliciting comments concerning 

application for special enrollment 

examination. 

DATES: Written comments should be 

received on or before December 16, 2024 

to be assured of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments 

to Andres Garcia, Internal Revenue 

Service, Room 6526, 1111 Constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224, or 

by email to pra.comments@irs.gov. 

Include OMB Control No. 1545–0949 in 

the subject line of the message. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Requests for additional information or 

copies of the form and instructions 

should be directed to LaNita Van Dyke, 

at (202) 317–6009, Internal Revenue 

Service, Room 6526, 1111 constitution 

Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20224, or 

through the internet at lanita.vandyke@

irs.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title: Application for Special 

Enrollment Examination. 

OMB Number: 1545–0949. 

Form Number: Form 2587. 

Abstract: Filers use this form to apply 

to take the Special Enrollment 

Examination to establish eligibility for 

enrollment to practice before the 

Internal Revenue Service. 

Current Actions: There are no changes 

being made to the form at this time. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Affected Public: Individuals or 

households. 

Estimated Number of Respondents: 

15,643. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: .10 

hr. 

Estimated Total Annual Burden 

Hours: 1,564. 

The following paragraph applies to all 

of the collections of information covered 

by this notice: 

An agency may not conduct or 

sponsor, and a person is not required to 

respond to, a collection of information 

unless the collection of information 

displays a valid OMB control number. 

Books or records relating to a collection 

of information must be retained as long 

as their contents may become material 

in the administration of any internal 

revenue law. Generally, tax returns and 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1