alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7556

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

WILLIE JAMES JONES, a/k/a Ricky Jones,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-93-285)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie James Jones, Appellant Pro Se. Dean Arthur Eichelberger,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellee

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his

motion for disclosure of a grand jury concurrence form. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. United States v. Jones, No. CR-93-285 (D.S.C.

Oct. 3, 1996). We deny Appellant's motions for extraordinary relief

and for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



EXHIBIT
    99.E
  SOUTHERN
    NATURAL GAS COMPANYIS OFFERING TO EXCHANGE
    its
    5.90% Notes due 2017
    which have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933
    for all issued and outstanding
    5.90% Notes due 2017
      A tender of such Old Notes may only
    be made by us as the holder of record and pursuant to your
    instructions.
    The Exchange Offer will expire at 5:00 P.M., New York
    City time,
    on          ,
    2007, unless the Exchange Offer is extended. Any Old Notes
    tendered pursuant to the Exchange Offer may be withdrawn at any
    time before the expiration of the Exchange Offer.
            The Letter of Transmittal is
    furnished to you for information only and may not be used
    directly by you to tender Old Notes.




---



##### 



INSTRUCTIONS WITH
    RESPECT TO
    THE EXCHANGE OFFER
            o

To tender the following Old Notes, subject to the terms and
    conditions set forth in the Prospectus and the related Letter of
    Transmittal, held by you for the account of the undersigned
    (insert principal amount of Old Notes to be tendered) (if any):
    $     .o

not to tender any Old Notes held by you for the account of the
    undersigned.     
    the New Notes acquired in exchange for Old Notes pursuant to the
    Exchange Offer are being acquired in the ordinary course of
    business of the person receiving such New Notes;
    the undersigned is not participating in, and has no arrangement
    with any person to participate in, the distribution of New Notes
    within the meaning of the Securities Act;
    neither the undersigned nor any such other person is an
    affiliate (within the meaning of Rule 405 under
    the Securities Act) of the Company or a broker-dealer tendering
    Old Notes acquired directly from the Company; and
    if the undersigned is not a broker-dealer, that the undersigned
    is not engaged in and does not intend to engage in the
    distribution of the New Notes.      ­
    ­
  ­
    ­
  ­
    ­
  ­
    ­
  ­
    ­
  None of the Old Notes held by us for your account will be
    tendered unless we receive written instructions from you to do
    so. Unless a specific contrary instruction is given in the space
    provided, your signature(s) hereon shall constitute an
    instruction to us to tender all the Old Notes held by us for
    your account.
 2
#### In the Matter of the Estate of John L. Craig, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

March 19, 1958.

*Bernard I. Shulman*for petitioner.

*Lewis Allins on*and *Andrew E. Ullmann*for Julius M. G-erzof, temporary coadministrator.

*Andrew E. Ullmann*for Maude R Craig, temporary coadministratrix.

John D, Bennett, S.

Without obtaining leave of this court as required in section 127 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, an action was commenced by the petitioner in the Supreme Court to foreclose a mortgage.

The petitioner now seeks the required leave to *“*commence, maintain and/or continue an action” against the temporary administrators.

*259In the case of *Homola*v. *Chase Nat. Bank*(257 App. Div. 643, motion for reargument denied 258 App. Div. 865) permission to sue temporary administrators had not been obtained from the Surrogate. The court held that such failure was substantial and that the Trial Justice, upon being apprised of such fact, was required to declare a mistrial. The court enunciated clearly the theory of the statute’s requirement that leave to sue a temporary administrator be first obtained from the Surrogate: “The statute has a very distinct purpose: the protection of the creditors of an estate who may have a vital interest in the outcome of a controversy such as this.” *(Homola*v. *Chase Nat. Bank, supra,*p. 645; see, also, *Matter of Herle,*165 Misc. 46, 52; *Barton*v. *Barbour,*104 U. S. 126, 128; *Matter of New York Municipal Ry. Corp.*v. *Holliday,*189 App. Div. 814, 819.)

It is obvious that considerable doubt exists whether leave to sue temporary administrators may be granted *nunc pro tunc.*The purpose of an order *nunc pro tunc*is primarily to correct irregularities in the entry of judicial mandates or like procedural errors *(Mohrmann*v. *Kob,*291 N. Y. 181): “ ‘ When a ruling has in fact been made but is improperly evidenced by a defective mandate, or by no mandate at all, an appropriate and suitable order or judgment which manifests the existence of a determination may subsequently be granted to take effect as of the date of such determination. ’ *(Merrick*v. *Merrick, supra,*p. 122 [266 N. Y. 120].) However, an order *nunc pro tunc*may not serve to record a fact, such as a divorce, as of a prior date when the fact did not then exist. ‘ A court has no power to have a new order or ruling so entered, thus bringing into the record an element which did not previously exist. The facts must exist, and then if the record of them is imperfect or incomplete, it may be amended; but if the record shows the actual facts then no order can be properly made changing them so as to take the place of an act that was required to be previously performed. While a court may record an existing fact *nunc pro tunc,*it cannot record a fact as of a prior date when it did not then exist. ’ ’ ’

The court denies as much of petitioner’s application as seeks leave to “continue” an action already commenced against the temporary administrators. Petitioner is granted leave to commence an action against such temporary administrators in the exercise of the court’s discretion.

Settle order on five days’notice.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; BRAIN Initiative Connectivity across Scales (BRAIN CONNECTS): Specialized Projects for Scalable Technologies (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         November 7, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Address:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852.                    

*Meeting Format:*                         Virtual Meeting.                    

*Contact Person:*                         Bo-Shiun Chen, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-496-9223,                         *bo-shiun.chen@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS).

Dated: October 8, 2024.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-23685 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2759 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2759

To amend the Illinois Land Conservation Act of 1995 to provide for the 
 use of certain fees and receipts collected under that Act for public 
schools and public roads in the vicinity of Midewin National Tallgrass 
                           Prairie, Illinois.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2000

  Mr. Durbin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Illinois Land Conservation Act of 1995 to provide for the 
 use of certain fees and receipts collected under that Act for public 
schools and public roads in the vicinity of Midewin National Tallgrass 
                           Prairie, Illinois.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF CERTAIN FEES AND RECEIPTS COLLECTED WITH RESPECT TO 
              MIDEWIN NATIONAL TALLGRASS PRAIRIE, ILLINOIS.

    Section 2915(f) of the Illinois Land Conservation Act of 1995 
(title XXIX of Public Law 104-106; 16 U.S.C. 1609 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(f) Treatment of User Fees and Salvage 
        Receipts.--Monies'' and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Treatment of User Fees and Salvage Receipts.--
            ``(1) In general.--Except as provided in paragraph (2), 
        monies''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(2) Use of Certain Amounts.--Of the monies collected 
        pursuant to subsections (d) and (e) each year, the Secretary of 
        the Treasury shall make available to the State of Illinois an 
        amount equal to 25 percent of such monies in accordance with 
        the sixth paragraph under the heading `FOREST SERVICE' in the 
        Act of May 23, 1908 (16 U.S.C. 500), for expenditure for the 
        benefit of public schools and public roads as specified in that 
        paragraph.''.
                                 <all>
```
SATICOY BAY LLC SERIES 3884 

SQUIRREL, 

Appellant, 

vs. 

WELLS FARGO BANK, NA., 

Re SD ondent. 

No. 65450 

FILED 

JAN 2.2 2016 

TRAC E K. 4 DEMAN 

• 04;1 A° 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

This is an appeal from a district court order denying a 

preliminary injunction in a quiet title action. Eighth Judicial District 

Court, Clark County; Stefany Miley, Judge. 

On August 7, 2013, appellant Saticoy Bay filed a complaint in 

the district court seeking to quiet title to the subject property and seeking 

an injunction. Respondent Wells Fargo filed a motion to dismiss, which 

the district court granted on November 7, 2013. Then, on March 18, 2014, 

over four months after the district court dismissed Saticoy Bay's action, 

Saticoy Bay purported to file a motion for a preliminary injunction as to 

the same case the district court had dismissed.' The district court denied 

Saticoy Bay's motion for a preliminary injunction, determining that there 

was no likelihood of success on the merits. Saticoy Bay appealed. 

'We note that the record contains no indication of any attempt to 

reconsider or to set aside the dismissal before the motion for a preliminary 

injunction was filed. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(01 1947A oe 
Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. We 

note that no timely appeal was taken from the motion to dismiss, see 

NRAP 4(a)(1) (providing thirty days to appeal), which was a final 

judgment disposing of the case on its merits, see Emerson v. Eighth 

Judicial Dist. Court of State, ex rel. County of Clark, 127 Nev. 672, 677, 

263 P.3d 224, 227 (2011) ("We have previously held that jurisdiction over 

matters related to the merits of a case terminates upon dismissal."). 

Additionally, no intervening action was taken to reopen this case. See, e.g. 

NRCP 60(b) (providing relief from judgment). Thus, the district court had 

no jurisdiction to consider the motion for a preliminary injunction, which 

was, at best, a fugitive document as to a closed case. Consequently, this 

court has no jurisdiction over the case. See Nev. Const. art. 6, § 4 (limiting 

the Nevada Supreme Court's jurisdiction t6 appeals in civil cases arising 

in the district courts and granting the power to issue writs). 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A cer> 
HH 

J. 

Accordingly, we are precluded from considering this appeal, 

and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED. 

Parraguirre 

/c4Je J. 

Hardesty 

"Rao\ J. 

Gibbons 

cc: Hon. Stefany Miley, District Judge 

Law Offices of Michael F. Bohn, Ltd. 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Tucson 

Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Las Vegas 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

3
[LETTERHEAD OF US BANK]



AnnualStatementofCompliance

UBS-BarclaysCommercialMortgageTrust2012-C4



VIA:EMAIL



UBSCommercialMortgageSecuritizationCorp.

1285AvenueoftheAmericas

New York, New York10019

Attention:NicholasG.Galeone

Email:nicholas.galeone@ubs.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com







| | Re: | ThePoolingandServicingAgreement(the"Agreement")datedasofDecember1,2012among UBSCommercialMortgageSecuritizationCorp.,as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors LLC, as special servicer,
TrimontReal Estate Advisors,Inc.,as operatingadvisor, andU.S. BankNational Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, payingagent and
custodian
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





I,KimberlyO.Jacobs,aSeniorVicePresidentofU.S.BankNationalAssociation,asCertificate AdministratorandCustodianherebycertifythat:



(1) A review of
the activities. of the Certificate Administrator and Custodian during the preceding calendar year and of the performance of the
certifying servicer under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator and Custodian have fulfilled all their obligations under the
Agreement in all material respects throughout such year



Capitalized terms
used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.





|Date: | 3/13/13
|----- | -------



| | U.S.BankNationalAssociationasCertificateAdministratorandCustodian
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                  
| | By:                                                              
| |                                                                  
| |
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Deborah Flores, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of JJ&R Ventures, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 13, 2009  /s/ Deborah Flores Deborah Flores President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to JJ& R Ventures, Inc. and will be retained by JJ&R Ventures, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 15-801 Date: February 2, 2015

Subject: The Federal Flexible Spending Account Program (FSAFEDS): 

 2015 Administrative Fees

Purpose 

To notify agencies that the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program (FSAFEDS) reserve 

account fee and administrative fees will change for the 2015 benefit period.

Background 

Administrative Fees 

Agencies pay administrative fees to ADP Benefit Services KY, Inc. (formerly known as SHPS, 

Inc. - the third party administrator under contract with the Office of Personnel Management) on 

behalf of their employees enrolled in FSAFEDS. 

Dependent-Care Flexible Spending Account (DCFSA) Administrative Fee 

The current DCFSA administrative fee will be reduced from $1.00 per DCFSA per month 

to $0.25 per DCFSA per month.

Health-Care Flexible Spending Account (HCFSA) Administrative Fee 

The current HCFSA administrative fee will be reduced from $1.00 per HCFSA per month 

to $0.25 per HCFSA per month.

Reserve Account Fee 

Agencies pay the reserve account fee to OPM on behalf of their employees enrolled in 

FSAFEDS. For 2015, the monthly reserve fee will remain unchanged at $0.25 per HCFSA per 

month. 

ADP Benefit Services KY, Inc. will send out the first of two annual invoice packages in February 

2015, reflecting the above fees. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment. 

Sincerely, 

John O’Brien

Director 

Health and Insurance
**-- ------~**  **------ --**  **---- --------**  **-------- ------------**  **---- --**  **-- --**  

# --- -- - - **-~~----**
Exhibit 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Andrew MacMillan, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of UserTesting, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;





b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and








---

Exhibit 31.1


b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.








Dated: March 4, 2022





UserTesting, Inc.By:/s/ Andrew MacMillanName:Andrew MacMillanTitle:Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Appendix II- Outstanding Data

For EPA Registration Nos. 47000-19, 47000-101

Outstanding Product Chemistry for 47000-19

830.1550 Product identity and composition

830.1600 Description of materials used to produce the product

830.1650 Description of formulation process

830.1670 Discussion of formation of impurities

830.1750 Certified limits

830.1800 Enforcement analytical method

830.6302 Color

830.6303 Physical state

830.6304 Odor

830.6314 Oxidizing or reducing action

830.6315 Flammability

830.6316 Explodability

830.6317 Storage stability

830.6319 Miscibility

830.6320 Corrosion characteristics

830.6321 Dielectric breakdown voltage

830.7000 pH

830.7100 Viscosity

830.7300 Density/relative density

Outstanding Product Chemistry for 47000-101

830.6317 Storage stability

830.6320 Corrosion characteristics