alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3511 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and New England 

National Scenic Trails as units of the National Park System, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 

Mr. SENSENBRENNER (for himself, Ms. MOORE, Mr. KIND, Mr. RIBBLE, Mr. 

GROTHMAN, Mr. POCAN, Mr. NOLAN, and Ms. ESTY) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To clarify the status of the North Country, Ice Age, and 

New England National Scenic Trails as units of the 

National Park System, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Scenic Trails 

5 Parity Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NORTH COUNTRY NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

7 Section 5(a)(8) of the National Trails System Act (16 

8 U.S.C. 1244(a)(8)) is amended in the third sentence by 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3511 IH

1 inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System’’ before 

2 the period at the end. 

3 SEC. 3. ICE AGE NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

4 Section 5(a)(10) of the National Trails System Act 

5 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(10)) is amended by striking the third 

6 and fourth sentences and inserting ‘‘The trail shall be ad7 ministered by the Secretary of the Interior as a unit of 

8 the National Park System.’’. 

9 SEC. 4. NEW ENGLAND NATIONAL SCENIC TRAIL. 

10 Section 5(a)(28) of the National Trails System Act 

11 (16 U.S.C. 1244(a)(28)) is amended in the third sentence 

12 by inserting ‘‘as a unit of the National Park System,’’ 

13 after ‘‘administer the trail’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Bedminster Financial Corp. (the
“Company”) on 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Paul
Patrizio, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
      Bedminster Financial Corp.




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.






BEDMINSTER
FINANCIAL CORP.




By:
            /s/
      Paul PatrizioPaul
      PatrizioPresident,
      Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
  Officer,




Date:
August 4, 2008
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the undersigned officer of Sunstock Inc. (formerly Sandgate Acquisition
Corporation (the “Company”)), hereby certify to my knowledge that:



The Report on Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2018 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



|Date: October 8,
    2019 | /s/ Jason C. Chang                                                                                            
|------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                          | Jason C. Chang
        President, Chief Financial Officer
        (Principal Executive and Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 202 (Friday, October 18, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83920]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24021]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 18, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 3, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 433 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2025-18, K2025-18.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-24021 Filed 10-17-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit
      32.2





Certification
      of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS


ADOPTED
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF TEHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Karen
      Pollino, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of
      Skreem Entertainment Corporation on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended
      September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
      in
      such Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects thefinancial condition
      and results of operations of Skreem Entertainment Corporation





By:
            /s/
                Karen PollinoName:
              Karen PollinoTitle:
              Chief Financial OfficerNovember
                19, 2007





1
# L_2011162EN.01001901.xml

| 22.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 162/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 162/19

---

AMENDMENTS TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL

THE EUROPEAN UNION CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular the fifth paragraph of Article 257 thereof,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 106a(1) thereof,

Having regard to Article 7(1) of Annex I to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union,

Having regard to the agreement of the Court of Justice,

Whereas certain provisions of the Rules of Procedure should be amended to allow the lodging and service of procedural documents by electronic means, without the need for those procedural steps to be confirmed by post or by the physical delivery of such documents,

With the Council’s approval given on 13 May 2011,

HAS ADOPTED THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE:

Article 1

The Rules of Procedure of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 25 July 2007 (OJ L 225 of 29 August 2007, p. 1, with corrigendum OJ L 69 of 13 March 2008, p. 37) (1) are hereby amended as follows:

| 1. | In the first sentence of Article 99(2), the words ‘or where the document to be served is a judgment or an order’ shall be deleted. |
| --- | --- |

1.

In the first sentence of Article 99(2), the words ‘or where the document to be served is a judgment or an order’ shall be deleted.

| 2. | A third paragraph shall be added to Article 99, worded as follows:
  ‘The Tribunal may by decision determine the criteria for a procedural document to be served by electronic means. That decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.’ |
| --- | --- |

2.

A third paragraph shall be added to Article 99, worded as follows:

‘The Tribunal may by decision determine the criteria for a procedural document to be served by electronic means. That decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.’

Article 2

These amendments to the Rules of Procedure, which are authentic in the languages referred to in Article 35(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court of the European Union, applicable to the Civil Service Tribunal by virtue of Article 7(2) of Annex I to the Protocol on the Statute of the Court of Justice, shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union and shall enter into force on the first day of the month following that of their publication.

Luxembourg, 18 May 2011.

---

(1)  Amended on 14 January 2009 (OJ L 24 of 28 January 2009, p. 10) and 17 March 2010 (OJ L 92 of 13 April 2010, p. 17).

1

---
U

. S

. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENE RGY CONSERVATION STANDARD

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE FOR METAL HALIDE LAMP FIXTURES

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20 585

Friday

, September 27, 2013

Room 8 E

- 089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss the energy

conservation standard notice of proposed rule . DOE will also explain its plans for the

remaining analyses for the rulemaking. Lastly, DOE will seek comment on the

rulemaking, including planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.

Agenda

9:00 am

– 9: 1 0 am Welcome ; Introductions; Opening Statements

Lucy d eButts and Doug Brookman

9: 1 0 am

– 1 0: 0 0 am Overview, S cope, Market and Technology Assessment,

Sc reening Analysis

Lucy deButts and Matthew Walker

1 0 : 0 0 am

– 1 1 : 00 am Engineering Analysis

Matt Chester

11 : 00 am

– 11: 15 am Break

11 : 15 am

– 1 1 : 45 p m Energy Use, Markup Analysis, Life

- Cycle Cost and

Payback Period Analysis

Michael Myer and Scott Morris

1 1: 45 am

– 12: 15 pm Shipments, National Impact Analysis

Michael Myer and Scott Morris

12: 15 pm

– 1: 15 pm Lunch

1: 15 pm

– 1: 45 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Hayden Cook

1 : 45 pm

– 2 : 15 pm LCC Subgroup Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis,

Emissions Analysis and Monetization of Emissions

, Regulatory Impact Analysis

Michael Myer and Scott Morris

2 : 15 pm

– 2 :45 pm Proposed Standard

Matthew Walker

2 :45 pm

– 3 :00 pm Closing Remarks

Lucy d eButts
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 08-201 Date: January 14, 2008 

Subject: The Massachusetts Health Care Reform Act 

Effective July 1, 2007, the Massachusetts Health Care Reform Act required residents of 

Massachusetts to have health insurance coverage which meets certain minimum standards. 

Massachusetts residents who do not have qualifying coverage will lose their state individual 

income tax exemption and be subject to other financial penalties. Under the state law, a health 

plan offered under the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program is deemed to 

provide “Creditable coverage” which satisfies the Massachusetts statute. 

Massachusetts residents age 18 and over will be required to demonstrate appropriate health 

insurance coverage to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue (DOR). Massachusetts 

residents who are FEHB enrollees may demonstrate appropriate health insurance coverage to the 

DOR using Massachusetts Schedule HC and a Form MA1099-HC which is required to be issued 

by their insurance carrier. FEHB plans operating within the state of Massachusetts should work 

with the DOR to issue Form MA 1099-HC to enrollees. These health plans include: 

• Aetna HealthFund 

• Blue CHIP Coordinated health Plan 

• ConnectiCare 

• Fallon Community Health Plan 

FEHB national fee-for-service plans which operate outside of Massachusetts may not have the 

opportunity to issue Form 1099-HC. Massachusetts residents enrolled in such a national plan 

should obtain a copy of Massachusetts Schedule HC and indicate that they have private health 

insurance but have not been provided a Form MA 1099-HC by their insurance company. Section 

2, Part 1 of the Schedule HC, has an oval for individuals to fill out if they have insurance but do 

not have a Form MA 1099-HC. If they fill out that oval and (following the instructions) include 

the name of the insurer and their subscriber number, they will demonstrate that they have 

insurance and will not be penalized for lack of insurance. Enrollees will find detailed 

instructions accompanying the Schedule HC. 
Attached for your reference are copies of the Massachusetts Schedule HC and Instructions. If 

you have any questions please contact Maggie Martel at 202-606-1772 or 

Marguerite.Martel@opm.gov. 

 Sincerely, 

Kay T. Ely 

Associate Director 

Human Resources Products and Services 

Attachments
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00103

- CR

Luis Manuel Trinidad a/k/a Luis M.

Trinidad

v.

The Stat e of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From the 297th District Court

o f Tarrant County (1295193D )

May 23, 2013

P er C uriam

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82630]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23622]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Bytecode Alliance Foundation

    Notice is hereby given that, on August 12, 2024, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Bytecode Alliance 
Foundation has filed written notifications simultaneously with the 
Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in 
its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of 
extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Interuniversitair Micro-Electronica Centrum vzw, Leuven, 
BELGIUM, has been added as a party to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and Bytecode Alliance Foundation intends 
to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in 
membership.
    On April 20, 2022, Bytecode Alliance Foundation filed its original 
notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of 
Justice published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 
6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022 (87 FR 29379).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 6, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 24, 2024 (89 FR 52509).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-23622 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ DOUGLAS DYNAMICS, LL C, Plaintiff

- Cross

- Appellant

v.

BUYERS PRODUCTS COMPANY, Defendant

- Appellant

______________________

2015

- 1263, 2015

- 1269

______________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in No. 3:09

- cv

- 00261

- wmc, Judge William M. Conley.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
A

ARON T. O LEJNICZAK , Andrus, Sceales, Starke & Sawall, Milwaukee, WI, argued for plaintiff

- cross

appellant. Also represented by C HRISTOPHER R EAGAN L IRO , E DWARD R. W ILLIAMS , J R

.
T HOMAS H ARRY S HUNK , Baker & Hostetler LLP, Cleveland, OH, argued for defendant

- appellant. Also represented by C HRISTINA J. M OSER

.

______________________T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (N EWMAN , C HEN , and S TOLL , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

January 19 , 2016 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Date Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2961

To amend the Customs drawback statute to authorize payment of drawback

where imported merchandise is recycled rather than destroyed.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 27, 2000

Mr. WYDEN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred

to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Customs drawback statute to authorize payment of drawback where imported merchandise is recycled rather than destroyed.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 Section 313 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,

4 is further amended by adding a new subsection (x) to read

5 as follows: ‘‘For the purposes of subsections (a), (b), and

6 (c) the term ‘destruction’ shall include an act in which

7 materials are recovered from the destroyed merchandise:

8 Provided, That in determining the amount of duties to be

9 refunded as drawback to the claimant, if the value of re10 covered materials, including value in the form of a tax ben-
2

S 2961 IS

1 efit or royalty payment, accrues to the drawback claimant,

2 that value shall be deducted from the value of the duty3 paid, imported merchandise that is destroyed, or from the

4 value of the merchandise used, or designated as used, in

5 the manufacture of the destroyed merchandise.’’.

Æ
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 83015]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23779]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL RETIREMENT THRIFT INVESTMENT BOARD


Notice of Board Meeting

DATES: October 22, 2024 at 10 a.m. eastern daylight time (EDT).

ADDRESSES: Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-
202-599-1426, Code: 828 801 968 #; or via web: https://www.frtib.gov/.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of 
External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Board Meeting Agenda.

Open Session

1. Approval of the September 24, 2024, Board Meeting Minutes
2. Monthly Reports
    (a) Participant Report
    (b) Legislative Report
3. Quarterly Reports
    (c) Investment Review
    (d) Audit Status
    (e) Budget Review
4. Internal Audit Update
5. OEA Annual Presentation
6. Social Science Update

Closed Session

7. Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6), (c)(9)(B), and 
(c)(10).

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).

    Dated: October 9, 2024.
Dharmesh Vashee,
General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.
[FR Doc. 2024-23779 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FAA UAS Civil COA Request 

Any information that is provided is bound by the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be releasable. This 

requires compliance to FOIA and consent to the release of your information. If you do not consent to the release of 

your information, you must contact us for further guidance. For more information, please visit http://www.foia.gov/. 

333 Exemption # or 

Date 07/16/2015 Federal Register pocket # ~~~ '2 ' calf 

Proponent Information 

Contact Name lWathana Prak ~ Company Name IDigital Life LLC 

Street Address 1 19607 Whitmore Drive 

Street Address 2 

City Richmond 

State VA Zip Code 123229 

Phone Number 804-543-3401 

E-mail Address wprak@me.com 

Aircraft System 

Aircraft Type IDJI Phantom 3 Pro Quad Copter 

Aircraft Registration IDJI Phantom 3 Pro 

Performance Characteristics 

Climb Rate 1984.252 Descent Rate 590.4 

(Feet/Minute) (Feet/Minute) 
Turn Rate 190 Approach Speed 115 

(Degrees/Second) 

Cruise Max 135.45 Min 10 

Speed 

Gross Takeoff Weight 12.82 Ibs. Launch/Recovery 124 minutes 

Operational I nformation 

Location 

~ 

Altitude 

4 

Description of 

Operation 

~ 

Greater Richmond, VA area. 

100-300 Distance from 15 miles 

nearest Town/City 

Will be use to preform aerial video from special events in the Greater 

Richmond, VA area to includes: Real Estate, Outdoor Events, Sports 

and Corporate Functions. 

Operations Area (Attach VFR Chart with Coordinates) 

Class of Airspace 

❑ A ❑ B(Requires FAA HQ approval) 

❑ Under Mode C Veil ❑ C 

❑ D ❑ E 

❑ G ❑ G(With an operational ATC Tower) 

Flight Conditions *y 

❑ VFR ❑ IFR 

Air Traffic Communication U' 

Transmitter Receiver Guard (Emergency Frequency) 

❑ VHF Q Yes Q Yes Q Yes 

Q No Q No Q No 
Transmitter Receiver Guard (Emergency Frequency) 

❑ UHF Q Yes Q Yes Q Yes 

Q No (~) No Q No 

~ i - ~•: 

Lost Link Procedures ~ 

1. How long to activate LL procedure 2. LL Altitude 

This System has a GPS come home if lost 1000 feet 

3. Lost Link Route 4. Lost Link Point 

If lost it will climb to 100 feet and take a straight It has a range of 1.2 Miles Radius 

course back the its take off spot base on GPS 

5. Flight Termination Point 

Onces it's out of range it will return to the spot 

of take off 

Lost Communication Procedures 

1. Between Pilot and Air Traffic Control ~W 

If lost operator will contact the Air Traffic Control via Cell Phone 

2. Between Pilot and Observer d: 

Pilot will contact the Observer via Cell Phone 
; Observer 

Line of Sight of Observer ~ 

❑,/ Yes 

❑ Other 

Observer Location lwithin unaided audible contamination range 

Time of Day Q Day Q Night Q Both 

Transponder (~) Yes Mode C ❑ 

Q No 

Q N/A 

Please return completed form to 9-AJV-115-UASOrganization(a ~faa.gov.