alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6182 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6182

**Commission Decision of 15/04/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6182 - MAN / MAN CAMIONS ET BUS / MAN TRUCK & BUS BELGIUM) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 15.04.2011

PUBLIC VERSION C(2011) 2820

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6182 – MAN / MAN Camions et Bus / MAN Truck & Bus Belgium Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 21 March 2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking MAN Truck & Bus AG (‘MAN Truck & Bus’, Germany), controlled by MAN SE (‘MAN’, Germany) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of MAN Camions et Bus S.A.S. (‘MAN Camions et Bus’, France) and MAN Truck and Bus N.V./S.A. (‘MAN Truck and Bus Belgium’, Belgium) by way of purchase of shares [2] .

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- MAN: development, manufacture and sale of trucks, buses and coaches, chassis and floor assemblies for buses, industrial and marine engines, diesel engines, turbo-machines and industrial services,

- MAN Camions et Bus: sale and after sale services of trucks, buses and coaches and the sale of chassis for coaches and (as a genuine agent) the sale of truck (diesel) engines and spare parts thereof,

- MAN Truck & Bus Belgium: sale and after sale services of trucks, buses and coaches and (as a genuine agent) the sale of truck (diesel) engines and spare parts thereof.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(d) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(Signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 101, 01.04.2011, p.38

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 17-2007 (A) L.P.
(the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General
Partner, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
and


(2)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Partnership.





By:
            /s/ Freddie M.
      KotekName:
            Freddie
      M. KotekTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
            November
      16, 2009
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 21, 2011                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                   |
| /s/ Fred Farnden                                                       |
| Fred FarndenChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) |
-  ORNL wins five FLC awards                                    Researchers, Technology Transfer staff, licensees recognized for excellence                                Read More 

# Technology Transfer

## We translate lab innovation into market solutions

Oak Ridge National Laboratory is helping to speed new technologies to market while also building supportive and resilient ecosystems to the benefit of our local, state, and national communities.

The depth and breadth of our wide-ranging, world-leading expertise and facilities are unparalleled and provide a competitive advantage to our partners. The Technology Transfer team is driven by our shared mission to connect the lab’s unique strengths in scientific discovery, clean energy technology, and national security to the world’s biggest challenges.

Subscribe to invention alerts

### Contact

JenniferT Caldwell

caldwelljt@ornl.gov

## Technologies Available for Licensing

## Analytical Instrumentation

View Portfolio

## Chemicals

View Portfolio

## COVID-19

View Portfolio

## Detectors and Sensors

View Portfolio

## Energy and Utilities

View Portfolio

## Healthcare and Biology

View Portfolio

## IT and Communications

View Portfolio

## Manufacturing

View Portfolio

## Materials

View Portfolio

## Security and Defense

View Portfolio

## Transportation

View Portfolio

## All Technologies

View Portfolio

## Current Research

## News

ORNL at CES: A week of pitches, presentations and conversations

## News

Innovation Crossroads puts a charge in battery startup, accelerating path from lab to market

## News

Four scientists receive Battelle Distinguished Inventor recognition

## News

Innovation Crossroads fellow wins EPA award
#### FOLLETTE v. STATE.

No. 18136.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1936.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1936.

R. G. Robertson, of Port Arthur, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without any statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment is affirmed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The motion for rehearing is based upon the averment that the appellant, through his attorney, prepared a statement of facts which was exhibited to the county attorney, who refused to agree to it; that, after the disagreement, appellant filed an affidavit stating his inability to pay for a statement of facts. However, the alleged affidavit is not before this court. The right to a statement of facts under the provisions of article 760, subd. 6, C.C.P., is conditioned upon compliance with the statute. Among the essential provisions is that which prescribes that the affidavit must be made by the accused. It is also necessary that the record show that the affidavit was filed and called to the attention of the trial court. The article in question is discussed .in Tex.Jur. vol. 4, p. 415, § 283.

We find nothing in the record which would authorize a reversal of the conviction.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Targanta Therapeutics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, George A. Eldridge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George A. Eldridge 
|George A. Eldridge     
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2008      

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 17-2007 (A) L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew A. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





By:
/s/ Matthew A. JonesName:
Matthew A. JonesTitle:
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
August 13, 2009
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for 

the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category 

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01184.A16 

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
| (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and, |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                      |   |                                                                    |   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Dated:      August 15, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Frank D’Agostino, Jr.                                    |   |
|                                                      |   | Frank D’Agostino, Jr.                                             |   |
|                                                      |   | Chief Financial Officer and Director of  Business Development |   |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3561 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3561

  To amend the section 484(r) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to 
   exclude certain marijuana-related offenses from the drug-related 
 offenses that result in students being barred from receiving Federal 
educational loans, grants, and work assistance, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2015

Mr. Blumenauer introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the section 484(r) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to 
   exclude certain marijuana-related offenses from the drug-related 
 offenses that result in students being barred from receiving Federal 
educational loans, grants, and work assistance, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fair Access to Education Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF MISDEMEANOR MARIJUANA POSSESSION OFFENSES FROM 
              DRUG-RELATED OFFENSES RESULTING IN SUSPENSION OF 
              ELIGIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR HIGHER 
              EDUCATION.

    Paragraph (1) of section 484(r) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 
(20 U.S.C. 1091(r)(1)) is amended by inserting after ``controlled 
substance'' the following: ``, but not including any misdemeanor 
offense for possession of marihuana (as such term is defined in section 
102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)),''.

SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY; RESUMPTION OF ELIGIBILITY.

    (a) Applicability.--The amendment made by section 2 shall apply to 
convictions for offenses described in the matter inserted by such 
amendment occurring before, on, and after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (b) Resumption of Eligibility.--Any student whose eligibility for 
grants, loans, and work assistance under title IV of the Higher 
Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) was suspended under 
paragraph (1) of section 484(r) of such Act by reason of a conviction, 
before the enactment of this Act, for an offense described in the 
matter inserted by the amendment made by section 2 of this Act shall, 
unless otherwise ineligible for such assistance, resume eligibility 
upon such date of enactment.
                                 <all>
```
Source Emissions Test Report

for Golden Aluminum:

Fort Lupton Mill

EPA ICR Emission Testing

Delacquering Furnace

September 9 and 10, 2010

Report prepared for:

Golden Aluminum

1405 East 14 th Street

Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621

Report prepared by:

Air Pollution Testing, Inc.

5530 Marshall Street

Arvada, Colorado 80002

APT Project: GAL0224

## Certification

Team Leader Certification:

I certify that all of the sampling and analytical p rocedures and data presented in

this report are authentic and accurate.

Scott Bouchard

B. S. Environmental Studies

Field Team Leader / Senior Project Manager

Reviewer Certification:

I certify that all of the testing details and concl usions are accurate and valid.

Karl Breuer

B. S. Earth Science / Environmental Science

Reviewer / Senior Technical Writer

## Table of Contents

1. Introduction....................................

................................................... ............... 1

2. Summary of Results..............................

................................................... ........ 2

3. Methods.....................

..................................................... ............................. 8

4. Test Program Summary....................................

............................................. 9

5. Test Method Details...............................

................................................... ....... 10

Tables

Table 1.1 : Testing Summary..........................

................................................ 1

Table 1.2 : Contact Personnel............................

............................................ 2

Table 2.1 : Test Results Summary, TVOC.................................

........... ... 3

Table 2.2 : Test Results Summary, M0031 – kg/hr......

.............................. 4

Table 2.3 : Test Results Summary, M0031 – kg/Mg Cha rge......

................. 5

Table 2.4 : Test Results Summary, M0010 – kg/hr............

....................... 6

Table 2.5 : Test Results Summary, M0010 – kg/Mg Cha rge........................ 7

Table 2.6 : Solids Test Results Summary, Metals......

......... ............. .......... 8

Table 4.1 : Sampling and Analytical Methods Summary

................................ 9

Appendices

Testing Parameters...........................................................

......... ....... Appendix 1

Field Data.......................................................................

......... ........ Appendix 2

Laboratory Data............................................

...................... ......... ...... Appendix 3

Calibration Information.................................

....................... ......... ...... Appendix 4

Schematics...................................................

................ ............. ...... Appendix 5
#### E. M. LINKENHOGER, Jr., Appellant, v. J. I. HAILEY, Appellee.

No. 10646.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Jan. 17, 1940.

Rehearing Denied March 6, 1940.

E. B. Ward, of Corpus Christi, for appellant. ,

Kemp, Lewright, Dyer, Wilson & Sor-rell, of Corpus Christi, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion. Associated Indemnity Corporation, et al. v. J. M. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294.
Exhibit 35.2



LOGO

Feb 28, 2019

Servicer
Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-5 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic Bank


By:

/s/ Ron Tremblay


Name: Ron Tremblay Title: Vice
President of Residential Lending Date: Feb. 28, 2019


San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San
Diego  Portland  Palm Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York

III PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-4405

FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER FDIC AND EQUAL HOUSING LENDER


LOGO



---

LOGO

<for SEMT 2012-5>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential
Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated October 30, 2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego  Portland  Palm
Beach  Boston  Greenwich  New York

III PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111,TEL (415) 392-1400 OR (800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-4405 FIRSTREPUBLIC.COM  MEMBER FDIC AND EQUAL HOUSING LENDER


LOGO
Exhibit
32








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002











In
connection with the Quarterly Report of 4th
Grade Films, Inc. (the “Registrant”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March
31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), we, James Doolin, President and Director, and
Shane Thueson, Vice President and Director, of the Registrant, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1) The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and








(2) The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.








Date:
            05/14/10
            
            By:
            /s/James
      DoolinJames
      DoolinPrincipal
      Financial Officer, President & DirectorDate:
            05/14/10
            
            By:
            /s/Shane
      ThuesonShane
      ThuesonPrincipal
      Executive Officer, Vice President &
Director
-78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5 -76.0 -75.5

37.5 38.0 38.5 39.0 

### ★ ▲ ▲
▲

▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 500 18 12 06 00 08/30 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thomas W. Brock, certify that:

 

1.        I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Silver Bay Realty Trust Corp.;

 

2.        Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 
| Date: April 28,   2017 | /s/ Thomas W. Brock                     |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
|                        | Thomas W. Brock                         |
|                        | President and Chief Executive   Officer |
|                        | (Principal Executive   Officer)         |

 

----