alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

 No. 07-7495 

DANIEL TINSLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA; MR. MAYO,

Lieutenant; MR. HICKS, Nurse; MR. BISHOP,

Lieutenant,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District

Judge. (2:07-cv-00382-RBS)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 28, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Tinsley, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Tinsley appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the

reasons stated by the district court. Tinsley v. Corrections Corp.

of America, No. 2:07-cv-00382-RBS (E.D. Va., Aug. 23, 2007). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
#### Sulk, Respondent, vs. Sulk, Appellant.

*February 4*

February *28, 1958.*

For the appellant there was a brief by *Beaudry & Kershek*and *Eugene A. Kershek,*all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Eugene A. Kershek.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Rice & Ramsey*and *Edward S. A. Ramsey,*all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *Edward S. A. Ramsey.*

Wingert, J.

The husband’s claim for relief from the alimony provisions of the judgment is based entirely on the contention that the court is without authority to require payment of alimony to a divorced wife whose maiden or other former name is restored to her pursuant to sec. 247.20, Stats. The contention cannot prevail. The rights of the ex-wife and the husband’s obligations to her are not dependent upon her name, but are founded upon the former marriage. Sec. 247.26 authorizes award of alimony “upon every divorce from the bond of matrimony for any cause excepting that of adultery *308committed by the wife,” without qualification relative to the wife’s name and without reference, express or implied, to sec. 247.20, which empowers the court to allow the wife to resume a former name where there are no children. We see no reason why *bona fide*resumption of a former name, or indeed any name not acquired by remarriage, should operate as a bar to the divorced wife’s continued support in whole or in part by her former husband, where such support is otherwise in order.

While we understand it has been customary in some courts having divorce jurisdiction to deny alimony where the wife’s former name is restored, and conversely to deny restoration of the former name where alimony is awarded, such action is based on the court’s discretion, and not on legal requirement.

Appellant relies on *Steffenson v. Steffenson,*259 Wis. 51, 47 N. W. (2d) 445, but that case is not in point. There we reluctantly held under the compulsion of *Richardson v. Stuesser,*125 Wis. 66, 103 N. W. 261, that neither at common law nor by statute is a husband obligated to support his wife while she is committed to a state institution for the insane. Alimony, however, is a different matter, authorized by statute; and as we have pointed out, the statute does not condition it upon the wife’s name.

*By the Court.*— Order affirmed.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Point.360 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of  1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/  Alan R.
SteelAlan
      R. SteelChief
      Financial OfficerNovember
      13, 2009
##### 



Exhibit 10.8
 TPP Unit Appreciation Right Grant
(Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company LLC Directors)
 Grant No.:
    
    TPPUAR-Date of Grant:
    
    , 20Name of Grantee:Grant Price per Unit:
    
    $Number of UARs Granted:
  Vesting
 No Right to Continue as a Director
 UAR Payment
 Transferability
 Governing Law




---



##### 



Plan Controls
 TEXAS EASTERN PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY LLCBy:[Name, Title]
 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 22-1606

In re: HAFAN ANTONIO RILEY,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (3:12-cr-00251-JFA-1)

Submitted: August 23, 2022 Decided: August 25, 2022

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, HEYTENS, Circuit Judge, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hafan Antonio Riley, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1606 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Hafan Antonio Riley petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court 

has unduly delayed in ruling on his motions for compassionate release. He seeks an order 

from this court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue 

delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition.*

 We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

* To the extent that Riley asks this court to grant him compassionate release, we 

deny this request because Riley has “other adequate means to attain the relief [he] desires.” 

In re Murphy-Brown, LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018) (internal quotation marks 

omitted). 

USCA4 Appeal: 22-1606 Doc: 10 Filed: 08/25/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
Exhibit 23**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No.333-145926) and on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-143005, 333-02374, 333-34766 and 333-104551) of StewartEnterprises, Inc. of our report dated December 21, 2007 relating to the consolidated financialstatements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Point.360 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Haig S. Bagerdjian, Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or
                15 (d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




/s/
      Haig
      S. Bagerdjian


Haig
      S.
      Bagerdjian


Chief
      Executive Officer


February
      12, 2008
**Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation by reference in this RegistrationStatement on Form S-1 of our report dated July 17, 2007, relating to the balancesheet of Eagle Rock Energy Partners GP, L.P appearing in the Form 8-K of Eagle Rock EnergyPartners, L.P. filed July 18, 2007, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in theProspectus, which is part of such Registration Statement./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 2940

_____________________________
A NTHONY C ORNELIUS J ACKSON , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County

. Jan Shackelford , Judge

. April 23, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.

A FFIRMED

.
B.L. T HOMAS , C.J., and B ILBREY and J AY , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defen der, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Anthony Cornelius Jackson, pro se

, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallah assee , for Appellee.
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

 

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Transtrend DTP Enhanced FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager ofML Transtrend DTP Enhanced FuturesAccess LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

 

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  August 13, 2008              |                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                          |                  |
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |
|                                               |                       |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.2

                              NUMERITY CORPORATION
                    256 W EL CAMINO REAL, SUNNYVALE, CA 94087

To IN Media Corporation
4920 El Camino Real, Ste 100,
Los Altos, CA 94022
December 31,  2010

                  REF PAYMENT TERMS FOR AMOUNTS DUE TO NUMERITY

Gentlemen:

As at December 31, 2010 IN Media Corporation owed Numerity  Corporation $467,000
in  respect  of  consulting  fees  payable  and $ 415,000  in respect of prepaid
license fees.  Numerity recognizes that IN Media is not in a position to pay its
debts,  nor will it likely be on a position to pay its debts to  Numerity  until
such time as it commences commercial shipments of its IP product offerings.

Accordingly,  for no charge,  Numerity will agree to extend the payment terms to
create a revolving  and interest free debt due one year and one day from receipt
of payment request by Numerity.

Any  additional  advances from Numerity to IN Media will be considered on a case
by case basis subject to mutual agreement.

Sincerely


/s/ Nitin Karnik
---------------------------------------------
Nitin Karnik, President, Numerity Corporation



/s/ Simon Westbrook.
---------------------------------------------
Simon Westbrook, CFO, IN Media Corporation
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SFH I Acquisition Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan Weisberg,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company,





Date:
                May 13, 2008
            /s/
                Alan WeisbergPrincipal
                Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 CARDTRONICS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(in thousands)
 Years ended December 31,
    
    
    Nine Months Ended September 30,2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002
    
    

2007
    
    

2006EARNINGS:(Loss) income before income taxes and
cumulative effect of accounting changes
    
    $
    (19
    )
    
    $
    (3,688
    )
    
    $
    9,381
    
    
    $
    5,288
    
    
    $
    138
    

    
    $
    (16,473
    )

    
    $
    (3,899
    )Minority interests
    
    
    (225
    )
    
    
    15
    
    
    
    19
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

    
    
    (286
    )

    
    
    (128
    )Fixed charges (as outlined below), less preferred dividends (a)
    
    
    26,914
    
    
    
    20,202
    
    
    
    8,072
    
    
    
    4,098
    
    
    
    1,913
    

    
    
    22,994
    

    
    
    20,115Total earnings, as defined
    
    $
    26,670
    
    
    $
    16,529
    
    
    $
    17,472
    
    
    $
    9,386
    
    
    $
    2,051
    

    
    $
    6,235
    

    
    $
    16,088FIXED CHARGES:Interest
charges (b)
    
    $
    25,072
    
    
    $
    22,426
    
    
    $
    5,235
    
    
    $
    2,157
    
    
    $
    1,039
    

    
    $
    21,592
    

    
    $
    18,772Less: write-off unamortized debt issuance
costs (c)
    
    
    (534
    )
    
    
    (5,038
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    (13
    )
    
    
    (169
    )

    
    
    
    

    
    
    (534
    )Interest component of rental expense
    
    
    2,376
    
    
    
    2,814
    
    
    
    2,837
    
    
    
    1,954
    
    
    
    1,043
    

    
    
    1,402
    

    
    
    1,877Preferred
dividends (d)
    
    
    
    
    
    
    1,770
    
    
    
    3,735
    
    
    
    3,314
    
    
    
    2,888
    

    
    
    
    

    
    
    Total fixed charges, as defined
    
    $
    26,914
    
    
    $
    21,972
    
    
    $
    11,807
    
    
    $
    7,412
    
    
    $
    4,801
    

    
    $
    22,994
    

    
    $
    20,115Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    N/A
    
    
    N/A
    
    
    
    1.5
    x
    
    
    1.3
    x
    
    N/A
    

    
    N/A
    

    
    N/AAmount of earnings insufficient to cover fixed
charges
    
    $
    244
    
    
    $
    5,443
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    $
    2,750
    

    
    $
    16,759
    

    
    $
    4,027
 
 (a)
    
    Excludes preferred dividends as such amounts were not
deducted in arriving at the (loss) income before income taxes amounts reflected
above.(b)
    
    Includes the amortization of debt discount and the amortization and write-off of
debt issuance costs.(c)
    
    Amounts included in interest charges line item above. As such, it is backed out separately
from the computation of fixed charges.(d)
    
    Amounts have been grossed-up at the Companys effective tax rate for each applicable
period.
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2714

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide a higher purchase

price limitation applicable to mortgage subsidy bonds based on median

family income.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 13, 2000

Mrs. LINCOLN (for herself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. HUTCHINSON, Mr. JEFFORDS,

and Mr. BREAUX) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide

a higher purchase price limitation applicable to mortgage

subsidy bonds based on median family income.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. INCREASE IN PURCHASE PRICE LIMITATION

4 UNDER MORTGAGE SUBSIDY BOND RULES

5 BASED ON MEDIAN FAMILY INCOME.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (1) of section 143(e)

7 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to pur8 chase price requirement) is amended to read as follows:
2

•S 2714 IS

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—An issue meets the require2 ments of this subsection only if the acquisition cost

3 of each residence the owner-financing of which is

4 provided under the issue does not exceed the greater

5 of—

6 ‘‘(A) 90 percent of the average area pur7 chase price applicable to the residence, or

8 ‘‘(B) 3.5 times the applicable median fam9 ily income (as defined in subsection (f)(4)).’’.

10 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by

11 this section shall apply to obligations issued after the date

12 of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 (Date of earliest event reported)
 Torch Energy Royalty Trust
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    1-1247
    
    74-6411424(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19890  (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 302/636-6016  (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits




---



##### 



TORCH ENERGY ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    Wilmington Trust Company, not in itsindividual capacity but solely as Trustee forthe Trust Date: August 17, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Bruce L. BissonBruce L. BissonVice President




---



##### 



Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Torch Energy Royalty Trust Press Release dated August 17, 2007.
EX-4.1




 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 INCORPORATED UNDER THE LAWS OF 
SPECIMEN
CERTIFICATE 
Stock Certificate Number 
Number of Shares 
ACC HOLDINGS, INC. 
COMMON STOCK 
THIS CERTIFIES THAT 
is the owner of Shares of the Capital Stock of 
AAC HOLDINGS, INC. 
transferable only on the books of the Corporation by the holder hereof in

person or by Attorney upon surrender of this Certificate property endorsed.

In Witness Whereof, the said Corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed 
by its duty authorized officers and its Corporate Seal to be hereunto affixed 
this day of A.D.

PRESIDENT SECRETARY 
SHARES $0.001 par value EACH 
ILLEGIBLE 196 








 



 
 THE SECURITIES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE BEEN

ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT AND HAVE NOT BEEN 
REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT
OF 1933. SUCH 
SHARES MAY NOT BE SOLD, PLEDGED, OR TRANSFERRED 
IN THE ABSENCE
OF SUCH REGISTRATION OR VALID 
EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION AND 
PROSPECTUS
DELIVERY REQUIREMENTS OF SAID ACT. 
CERTIFICATE FOR 
SHARES 
of the 
Capital Stock 
AAC HOLDINGS, INC. 
ISSUED TO 
DATE 
For Value Received, hereby sell, assign, and transfer 
unto 
Shares 
of the Capital Stock represented by the within 
Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably
constitute and appoint 
Attorney 
to transfer the said Stock on the books of
the within named 
Corporation with full power of substitution in the premises.

Dated ,20 
In presence of 
NOTICE. THE SIGNATURE OF THIS ASSIGNMENT 
MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE

FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE, IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT 
ALTERATION OR
ENLARGEMENT, OR ANY CHANGE WHATEVER.
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2011159EN.01000501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 17.6.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 159/5 |

---

COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 573/2011

of 16 June 2011

implementing Article 16(2) of Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 of 2 March 2011 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Libya [(1)](#ntr1-L_2011159EN.01000501-E0001), and in particular Article 16(2) thereof,

Whereas:

In view of the developments in Libya, the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 should be amended,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The entry for the person set out in the Annex to this Regulation shall be deleted from the list set out in Annex III to Regulation (EU) No 204/2011.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 June 2011.

For the Council

The President

MARTONYI J.

---

[(1)](#ntc1-L_2011159EN.01000501-E0001)  
[OJ L 58, 3.3.2011, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2011_058_R_TOC).

---

ANNEX

Person referred to in Article 1

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 14. | ZARTI, Mustafa |

---