alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6125 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6125

**Commission Decision of 08/03/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6125 - REALE / UNNIM / CSG) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 8.3.2011

SG-Greffe(2011) D/3614-3615

C(2011) 1649 final

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6125- REALE / UNNIM / CSG Notification of 07/02/2011 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 43, 11-02-2011, p.21

1. On 04/02/2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Reale Seguros Generales, SA, (‘Reale’, Spain) controlled by Società Reale Mutua di Assicurazioni (‘Reale Mutua Group’, Italy) and Unnim (‘Unnim’, Spain) acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Caixasabadell Companyia d’Assegurances Generals, SA (‘CSG’), Spain by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

– for Reale: active in the insurance sector in Spain,

– for Reale Mutua Group: international group active in the banking, insurance, real estate and services sectors,

– for Unnim: group of companies that engages mainly in banking operations and to a much lesser extent insurance distribution in Spain,

– for CSG: active in the non-life insurance sector (accidents, fires and natural disasters, other property losses, general liability, diverse pecuniary losses as well as legal defence and assistance) in Spain.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 (c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(Signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
# .l!fE,. t3

10, SCS Engineers, Chemical

### Sp~eiation of qontaminants !n FGD Sludge and**Waate~ater.** u.s. EPA, SHWRD/HERL, Contract Number 68-03-2371 March, 1978. 

# 1-

, 

# I I I I



# c



# ....

I 

# 0 0> 

# 0
1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-7 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;
 
 4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and
 
 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.
 
  
 
  
 /s/ CHRISTIAN LOWN
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3387 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3387

   To amend the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, and the 
 Federal Advisory Committee Act to apply the requirements of such Acts 
        to the Smithsonian Institution, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2015

  Ms. Norton introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Freedom of Information Act, the Privacy Act, and the 
 Federal Advisory Committee Act to apply the requirements of such Acts 
        to the Smithsonian Institution, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Open and Transparent Smithsonian Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF OPEN GOVERNMENT LAWS TO SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION.

    (a) Freedom of Information Act.--Section 552 of title 5, United 
States Code (commonly referred to as the Freedom of Information Act) is 
amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
    ``(m) For purposes of this section, the Smithsonian Institution 
shall be considered an agency, and the Secretary of the Smithsonian 
Institution shall be considered the head of the agency.''.
    (b) Privacy Act.--Section 552a(a)(1) of title 5, United States Code 
(commonly referred to as the Privacy Act), is amended by striking the 
semicolon at the end and inserting ``, except that such term also 
includes the Smithsonian Institution;''.
    (c) Requiring Open Meetings.--Section 552b of title 5, United 
States Code (relating to open meetings) is amended by striking the 
semicolon at the end and inserting ``, except that such term also 
includes the Smithsonian Institution;''.
    (d) Federal Advisory Committee Act.--Section 4 of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by adding at the end 
the following new subsection:
    ``(d) The Smithsonian Institution shall be considered an advisory 
committee for purposes of this Act, other than section 14.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE AND APPLICATION.

    (a) Effective Date.--This Act and the amendments made by this Act 
shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act.
    (b) Application.--This Act shall apply to--
            (1) all actions taken by the Board of Regents of the 
        Smithsonian Institution or any officer or employee of the 
        Smithsonian Institution before, on, or after the date of 
        enactment of this Act;
            (2) any record created before, on, or after that date; and
            (3) any meeting held before, on, or after that date.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 FIRST AMENDMENT TO UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.
401(k) RETIREMENT AND SAVINGS PLAN
 WHEREAS




---



##### 



UNIVERSAL COMPRESSION, INC.By:

/s/
Donald C. WayneName:
    Donald C. WayneTitle:
    Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Opinion filed March 16 , 2023



### In The 

# Eleventh Court of Appeals

_____ _

____
No. 11

- 22

- 00 262

- CV

__________ DAVID HILTON AND CINDY HILTON , Appellant s
V.

5J OILFIELD SERVICES , LLC , Appellee

On Appeal from the 350 th District Court Tayl or County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 12750

- D

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N The parties have filed in this court a joint motion to dismiss this appeal. In the motion, the parties state that they have finalized their settleme nt agreement and that “there are no longer any issues in controversy between them” as it relates to this appeal. The parties request that we dismiss this appeal, leaving the trial court’s summary judgment intact, and that we tax costs against the party in curring same.
See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.1.2 The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed

.

PER CURIAM

March 16 , 2023 Panel consists of: Bailey, C. J., Trotter , J., and Williams , J.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YUDDY HARTONO, a.k.a.

Christophorus,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72073

Agency No. A099-824-474

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted November 13, 2012** 

Before: CANBY, TROTT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Yuddy Hartono, a native and citizen of Indonesia, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum, withholding of

FILED

NOV 19 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-72073

removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have

jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Reviewing for substantial evidence the

agency’s factual findings, Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d 1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009),

we deny in part and grant in part the petition for review, and remand for further

proceedings.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s denial of CAT relief because

Hartono failed to demonstrate it is more likely than not he will be tortured if

returned to Indonesia. See Wakkary, 558 F.3d at 1067-68. Accordingly, Hartono’s

CAT claim fails. 

With respect to asylum and withholding of removal, Hartono alleges native

Indonesian youths repeatedly beat him, and, while in high school, a native

Indonesian youth broke his nose and a mob of Muslims attacked him, beat him

with a metal pipe and wooden stick, and burned his chest with cigarettes. 

Substantial evidence does not support the BIA’s finding that these experiences do

not rise to the level of persecution. See Mamouzian v. Ashcroft, 390 F.3d 1129,

1134 (9th Cir. 2004) (“We have consistently found persecution where, as here, the

petitioner was physically harmed . . . [particularly where] such harm was inflicted

on more than one occasion over a period of years . . . .”) (internal citation omitted);

Baballah v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1067, 1076 (9th Cir. 2004). If Hartono is able to
3 10-72073

establish past persecution, he is entitled to a presumption of a well-founded fear of

future persecution. 8 C.F.R. § 1208.13(b)(1). Accordingly, we grant the petition

for review as to Hartono’s asylum and withholding of removal claims, and we

remand to the agency for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See

INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam). We also remand for the

agency to address Hartono’s argument that he faces persecution on account of an

imputed political opinion. See id.

Each party shall bear its own costs for this petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; GRANTED in part;

REMANDED.
ANTHONY KEITH COUNCIL
,
Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Respondent. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5450

Opinion filed March 4, 2016.

Petition for Belated Appeal

-- Original Jurisdiction

. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorne y General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner is granted a belated appeal of the August 28, 2015, judgment and

sentence in Bay County Circuit Court case number 13

- 3537

- CF. Upon is suance of2 mandate in this cause, a copy of this opinion shall be provided to the clerk of the circuit

court for treatment as the notice of appeal. Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(c)( 6 )(D). If

petitioner qualifies for appointed counsel, the trial court shall appoin t counsel to

represent petitioner on appeal.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 For Immediate Release  Contact:
David Rescino
Kitty Hawk, Inc.
972-456-2422
 Kitty Hawk, Inc. to Cease Scheduled Network Air and Ground Operations
 
    
    Kitty Hawk will continue to operate air cargo charter operations
     www.kittyhawkcompanies.com
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Charles E. Phillips, Jr., certify that:



|1. | I have reviewed this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Infor, Inc.; and
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: July 22, 2016 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ CHARLES E. PHILLIPS, JR.        
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Charles E. Phillips, Jr.            
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
Attachment 1: Agency/Tribal Employer Request 

for Verification of Family Member Eligibility 

For Employing Office/Tribal Employer Use 

[INSERT DATE] 

[INSERT EMPLOYEE NAME AND ADDRESS] 

Dear [EMPLOYEE]:

We are conducting an eligibility review of certain family members covered under your Federal 

Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) enrollment. 5 CFR 890.308(f) allows for an employing 

office to request that an employee verify the eligibility of any or all family members covered 

under the employee’s FEHB enrollment at any time.

Our records show that the following family member(s) are being provided coverage under your 

[(Self Plus One) (Self and Family)] enrollment. 

1. [INSERT NAME OF COVERED FAMILY MEMBER]

2. [INSERT NAME OF COVERED FAMILY MEMBER]

Eligible family members are limited to: 

• Your current spouse

• Your children under age 26, including:

o Adopted children

o Stepchildren

o Foster children under certain circumstances

• An adult child incapable of self-support because of a mental or physical disability that

existed before age 26

Please see the U.S. Office of Personnel Management website for more information on eligible 

family members. 

You must comply with this request and submit documentation of each family member’s 

eligibility within 60 calendar days from the date of this notice. Please see the attached FEHB 

Family Member Eligibility Documents for information on appropriate documentation. If you do 

not submit appropriate documentation that confirms eligibility of your family member(s) to be 

covered under your FEHB enrollment, the person(s) will be removed from coverage under your 

FEHB enrollment 60 calendar days from the date of this notice. 

Send the documentation to: 

[INSERT specific instructions to receive documents requested] 

Any intentional false statement or willful misrepresentation, such as including an ineligible 

family member on an FEHB health plan, is a violation of the law (18 U.S.C. 1001). 

If you have questions about this request, you may contact us at: 

[INSERT CONTACT INFORMATION] 
[SIGNATURE] 

Attachment FEHB Family Member Eligibility Acceptable Documents 

cc: [FEHB Carrier]
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                              |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing D1086-120,12th Floor 550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial
Mortgages Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-GC8 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from September 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the
period September 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13thday of March 2013.



|                                                                       
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Daniel E. Bober                                                    
|Executive Vice President
Commercial Mortgage Servicing Wells Fargo
Bank



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 21, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (the “Act”), Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Osthus GmbH, Aachen, GERMANY; QunaSys, Bunkyo, JAPAN; BioLizard, Gent, BELGIUM; and Medable, Palo Alto, CA, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and Pistoia Alliance, Inc. intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 28, 2009, Pistoia Alliance, Inc. filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on July 15, 2009 (74 FR 34364).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on May 28, 2024. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 28, 2024 (89 FR 54046).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-23618 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Attachment 2: Receipt of Eligibility Verification Documents 

[INSERT DATE] 

[INSERT EMPLOYEE NAME AND ADDRESS] 

We have reviewed the documents you submitted in response to our request to verify that the 

person(s) listed below are eligible for coverage under your Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program enrollment. 

We have determined that the documentation you submitted verifies current eligibility for the 

family member(s) listed. 

1. [INSERT NAME OF VERIFIED FAMILY MEMBER] 

No changes will be made to your enrollment and you do not need to take any further action. 

Thank you for your prompt attention to our request. Please retain a copy of this letter for your 

records. 

[SIGNATURE] 

Cc: FEHB Carrier/Employing Office/Tribal Employer