alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Diane Button, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: December 9, 2010  /s/ Diane Button Diane Button President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Appendix A 

Total Particulate Mass Continuous Emission 

Monitoring System Supporting Documents 

 Version 1.0 

 November, 2005
Table of Contents 

1. Performance Specification 11 – Specifications and Test Procedures for Particulate 

Matter Continuous Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources, 40 CFR 

Part 60, Appendix B, January 12, 2004. 

2. Procedure 2- Quality Assurance Requirements for Particulate Matter Continuous 

Emission Monitoring Systems at Stationary Sources, 40 CFR Part 60, Appendix 

F, January 12, 2004. 

3. EPA Draft Guidance Documents on PM CEMS, provided to Eli Lilly and 

Company by EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards March 3, 2005. 

a. Precision and Bias Guidance 

b. Procedure 2 Audits 

c. Procedure 2 Routine Checks 

d. PS11 Example Calculations 

e. PS11 Spreadsheet Example 

f. Relative Calibration Audit Data Evaluation 

g. Stratification Procedure
**Exhibit 32.4****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906****OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ferrellgas Finance Corp.for the three months ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the dateindicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ferrellgas Finance Corp. at the dates and for theperiods indicated within the Report.     The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is subject to the “knowledge” and“willfulness” qualifications contained in 18 U.S.C. 1350(c).     This certification is being furnished to the SEC and is not to be deemed “filed” with the SECfor purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18.In addition, this certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any registrationstatement of Ferrellgas Finance Corp. or other filing of Ferrellgas Finance Corp. made pursuant tothe Exchange Act or Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified as beingincorporated therein by reference.Dated: June 7, 2007                                                       /s/ James E. Ferrell   James E. Ferrell   Chief Executive Officer                                                      /s/ Kevin T. Kelly   Kevin T. Kelly   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    ***** **As required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, a signed original of this written statement has been providedto Ferrellgas Finance Corp.**
Excerpt from the ORNL Smoking Policy (issued 1/29/2010): ORNL is 

committed to ensuring the health and safety of its employees and to providing a 

comfortable and productive work environment. Medical evidence has recognized that 

smoking and environmental tobacco smoke can be harmful to smokers’ and 

nonsmokers’ health. Consistent with these concerns and with regulations, the 

following policy has been established to restrict smoking in most areas at ORNL, and 

to accommodate the preferences of both smokers and nonsmokers.

In accordance with Tennessee Law, it is the policy of UT-Battelle, LLC, to prohibit 

smoking in all buildings, in government vehicles, and other enclosed structures or 

equipment managed by UT-Battelle. UT-Battelle Policy provides that smoking 

outdoors is further limited to designated smoking areas that have been established, 

equipped, and posted. Smoking areas are typically located at least 25 feet from 

building entrances and ventilation intake ducts to prevent smoke infiltration into the 

buildings. Smoking is not allowed between designated smoking areas. For 

aesthetics and fire safety reasons, smokers are to use ‘butt can’ receptacles and are 

not to dispose of butts on the ground or in regular trash cans. Although electronic 

cigarettes are not tobacco products, their use is also limited to designated areas to 

avoid confusion with the implementation of the ORNL Smoking Policy.
Exhibit 21.1**SUBSIDIARIES OF POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC.**   **Name of Subsidiary** **Incorporated**Powell Industries, Inc. DelawarePowell Electrical Systems, Inc. DelawareTransdyn, Inc. DelawarePowell Industries International, Inc. DelawarePowell Industries Asia, Inc. DelawarePowell International Europe B.V. NetherlandsSwitchgear & Instrumentation Ltd United KingdomSwitchgear & Instrumentation Properties Ltd United Kingdom
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement System Insurance Program System 

United States        Office of  Personnel Management The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency  

 Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter                                                     Number: 01- 311                                                                         Date:  February 23, 2001  

  Subject:  New Address for the Office of Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance   The Office of Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (OFEGLI), where FEGLI claims are processed, has moved.  Effective immediately, please send Part 2 of your Agency Certification of Insurance Status (SF 2821) to the new address.  If you have recently sent material to OFEGLI at its old address, it will be forwarded to the new address.  The new OFEGLI address is:        P.O. Box 2627      Jersey City, NJ 07303-2627  You should send overnight mail deliveries ONLY (such as, FedEx) to:       2 Montgomery Street,      Jersey City, NJ 07302-3802  You should still contact OFEGLI on (212) 578-2975.  However, OFEGLI's fax number has changed to (201) 395-7950.  We have posted this information on the FEGLI web site and it has been issued to agency personnel offices under cover of BAL 01-205, dated February 15, 2001.  If you have any questions regarding this information, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so that we have a record of our communications.  You may also phone us on (202) 606-0606. 

             Robert A. Yuran, Chief 

       Financial Policy Staff          

mailto:finance@opm.gov
N THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

No. 01-014 

YARBRO, LTD., a Nevada Corporation, d/b/a 

LAKE MEAD RADIOLOGISTS, 

Plaintiff and Appellant, 

v. 

MISSOULA FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, 

a Montana Banking Corporation, DOE INDIVIDUALS 

I-X, and ROE CORPORATION I-X, 

Defendant and Respondent. 

1 ORDER 

1 

Respondent MissoulaFederal Credit Union has moved this Court to strike attachments 

F, H, and J from the appendix to Appellant's opening brief, along with all arguments based 

on those attachments, on the basis that those attachments are not part of the'record created 

in the district court. Exhibits F and J are copies of one-page letters between counsel to this 

action. Exhibit H is a copy of a set of responses to discovery requests. 

On April 2, 2001, Appellant filed a response objecting to the motion to strike. 

Appellant contends that attachments F, H, and J, are included in the record. That contention 

is disproved, however, by an examination of the record. 

It appearing that Respondent's motion is well-founded, 

IT IS ORDERED that the motion to strike is GRANTED and Attachments F, H, and 

J shall be stricken and physically removed from the original and each copy of Appellant's 

opening brief, and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the following portions ofthe original and each copy 

of Appellant's opening brief shall be redacted: 

a. the last four lines of page 8, to the end of the parenthetical 
b. lines 5 through 8 of page 11, to the end of the parenthetical 

c. beginning with the words "In fact," lines 1-4 of page 16 

d. the second full paragraph of page 22. 

The Clerk is directed to mail copies of this Order to all counsel of record. 

\h DATED this bay of April, 2001.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 7212

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. ANTOINE DEWAYNE MYLES, a/k/a Twan , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. ( 5:15

- cr
- 00172

- BO

- 2 )

Submitted : November 19, 2020 Decided: November 24, 2020

Before WILKINSON, KING, and QUATTLEBAUM , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Antoine Dewayne Myles , Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Antoine Dewayne Myles seeks to appeal the di strict court’s order denying his motion for judgment of acquittal or, alternatively , for a new trial. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, United States v. Sueiro , 946 F.3d 637, 639

- 40 (4th Cir.), cert. denied , 140 S. Ct. 2553 (2020)

. The order Myles seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny Myles’ motion to appoint counsel and dismiss the app eal for lack of jurisdiction

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
##### 



P.O. Box 2521Houston, Texas 77252-2521Office: 713/381-3636
 
    
    
    Participate in the Plan if you currently are a unitholder of record of our units or if
you own our units through your broker (by having your broker participate on your behalf).
    
    Automatically reinvest all or a portion of the quarterly cash distributions of your
TEPPCO units or elect to receive such distributions electronically or by check;
    
    Purchase units of TEPPCO at a discount ranging from 0%  5% (currently set at 5%),
which will be set from time to time by TEPPCO;
    
    Deposit certificates for safekeeping in your Plan account at no cost to you, if you own
units in certificate form;
    
    Sell units of TEPPCO conveniently through the Plan;
    
    Transfer units of TEPPCO to another person at no cost by opening a Plan account for the
recipient; and
    
    Manage your account over the Internet via Investor ServiceDirect® at
www.melloninvestor.com/isd.
 www.melloninvestor.com/isd
 We encourage you to read the enclosed prospectus, including the
information incorporated by reference therein, in their entirety prior to making a decision to
participate in the Plan.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2722

AN ACT

To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to Ed W.

Freeman, James K. Okubo, and Andrew J. Smith.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

S 2722 ES

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO AWARD MEDAL OF HONOR TO

2 ED W. FREEMAN, JAMES K. OKUBO, AND AN3 DREW J. SMITH.

4 (a) INAPPLICABILITY OF TIME LIMITATIONS.—Not5 withstanding the time limitations in section 3744(b) of

6 title 10, United States Code, or any other time limitation,

7 the President may award the Medal of Honor under sec8 tion 3741 of such title to the persons specified in sub9 section (b) for the acts specified in that subsection, the

10 award of the Medal of Honor to such persons having been

11 determined by the Secretary of the Army to be warranted

12 in accordance with section 1130 of such title.

13 (b) PERSONS ELIGIBLE TO RECEIVE THE MEDAL OF

14 HONOR.—The persons referred to in subsection (a) are

15 the following:

16 (1) Ed W. Freeman, for conspicuous acts of

17 gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life and

18 beyond the call of duty on November 14, 1965, as

19 flight leader and second-in-command of a helicopter

20 lift unit at landing zone X–Ray in the Battle of the

21 Ia Drang Valley, Republic of Vietnam, during the

22 Vietnam War, while serving in the grade of Captain

23 in Alpha Company, 229th Assault Helicopter Bat24 talion, 101st Cavalry Division (Airmobile).

25 (2) James K. Okubo, for conspicuous acts of

26 gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life and
3

S 2722 ES

1 beyond the call of duty on October 28 and 29, and

2 November 4, 1944, at Foret Domaniale de Champ,

3 near Biffontaine, France, during World War II,

4 while serving as an Army medic in the grade of

5 Technician Fifth Grade in the medical detachment,

6 442d Regimental Combat Team.

7 (3) Andrew J. Smith, for conspicuous acts of

8 gallantry and intrepidity at the risk of his life and

9 beyond the call of duty on November 30, 1864, in

10 the Battle of Honey Hill, South Carolina, during the

11 Civil War, while serving as a corporal in the 55th

12 Massachusetts Voluntary Infantry Regiment.

13 (c) POSTHUMOUS AWARD.—The Medal of Honor may

14 be awarded under this section posthumously, as provided

15 in section 3752 of title 10, United States Code.

16 (d) PRIOR AWARD.—The Medal of Honor may be

17 awarded under this section for service for which a Silver

18 Star, or other award, has been awarded.

Passed the Senate June 13, 2000.

Attest:

Secretary.

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2722

AN ACT

To authorize the award of the Medal of Honor to

Ed W. Freeman, James K. Okubo, and AndrewJ. Smith.
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Kunal K. Singh,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the J.P. MorganChase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-C8 (the "Exchange Actperiodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

KeyBank NationalAssociation (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital Markets, Inc.), asMaster Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asTrustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Custodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior Trust Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated: March 16, 2020

 

 

/s/ Kunal K. Singh

 

 

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
| (logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC | 130 S. Jefferson, Suite 300

Chicago, IL 60661

312-233-6440 |
|--------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OFCOMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION’SREGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year endingDecember 31, 2016, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **WellsFargo Bank** (the “Servicer”).

 

National Tax Search, LLC(“NTS”) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2016and for the period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the“Reporting Period”) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the“CFR”). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated to NTS bythe Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Onlyservicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the“Applicable Servicing Criteria”) are applicable to the activitiesNTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS hasdetermined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) ofthe SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs withrespect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered bythis report include all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer usingNTS’s TaxQ system (the “Platform Transactions”).

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessedits compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Periodand has concluded that NTS has complied, in all material respects, with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2016 and for the ReportingPeriod with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, anindependent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation reporton the assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as ofDecember 31, 2016 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

National Tax Search, LLC, asVendor to Servicer

 

 

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO 

January 23, 2017
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2010 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 16, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Allan D. Ivie, IVName:
    Allan D. Ivie, IVTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
# Find People

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

## A-Z

        - A (425)
        - B (953)
        - C (821)
        - D (506)
        - E (208)
        - F (310)
        - G (600)
        - H (782)
        - I (74)
        - J (277)
        - K (456)
        - L (565)
        - M (937)
        - N (208)
        - O (155)
        - P (575)
        - Q (26)
        - R (551)
        - S (1093)
        - T (403)
        - U (38)
        - V (129)
        - W (627)
        - X (23)
        - Y (117)
        - Z (104)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Metavante Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frank R. Martire, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/S/    FRANK R. MARTIRE
|Frank R. Martire       
|Chief Executive Officer

November 12, 2008

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Opinion issued January 11, 2024

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00 495
- C R

——————————— IN RE WILLIAM M. JONES , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator William M. Jones , incarcerated and acting pro se, filed a petition for
writ of mandamus “ seeking to compel the [t]rial [c]ourt to perform its [m]inisterial dut[y] and rule on Relator ’ s ‘petition for DNA testing.’” 1

1 The underlying case is The State of Texas v. William M. Jones , Cause No. 1387546 , pending in the 351st District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Natalia Cornelio presiding.2

We deny the petition. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 5 2.8(a). A ny pending motions are
denied as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justic e Adams and Justices Landau and Rivas

- Molloy. Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).