alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TOMLIN v. STATE.

No. 15471.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

D. R. Taylor, of Center, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is child desertion; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges Of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
132531 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 132531 COA: 273069 Ionia CC: 06-013241-FH ANTHONY LEE GRIGGS, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is consider ed, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

p0220 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2007

Clerk
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 44576

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

TAJA DAWN NEWCOMB,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2017 Unpublished Opinion No. 505

Filed: June 28, 2017

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Fifth Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Minidoka County. Hon. Jonathan P. Brody, District Judge. 

Order denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Jason C. Pintler, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GUTIERREZ, Judge; MELANSON, Judge;

and HUSKEY, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

Taja Dawn Newcomb pleaded guilty to possession of controlled substance, 

methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732(c)(1). The district court imposed a three-year 

determinate sentence. Newcomb filed an Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motion, which the district 

court denied. Newcomb appeals.

A motion for reduction of sentence under I.C.R. 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, 

addressed to the sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 

23, 24 (2006); State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In 

presenting an I.C.R. 35 motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of 

new or additional information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the 
2

motion. State v. Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the 

record, including any new information submitted with Newcomb’s I.C.R. 35 motion, we 

conclude no abuse of discretion has been shown. Therefore, the district court’s order denying 

Newcomb’s I.C.R. 35 motion is affirmed.
OPM.gov / Retirement / Leaving the Government

Skip to main content

### In this section

- My Annuity and Benefits Toggle submenu   - Services Online
  - Life Events
  - Annuity Payments
  - Healthcare & Insurance
  - Medicare
  - Thrift Savings Plan
  - Related Federal Benefits
  - Retirement Eligibility Surveys
  - Representative Payees
- CSRS Information Toggle submenu   - Eligibility
  - Computation
  - Creditable Service
  - Planning and Applying
  - Types of Retirement
  - Survivors
  - Military Retired Pay
  - Service Credit
  - Former Employees
- FERS Information Toggle submenu   - Eligibility
  - Computation
  - Creditable Service
  - Planning & Applying
  - Types of Retirement
  - Survivors
  - Military Retired Pay
  - Service Credit
  - Former Employees
- Phased Retirement
- Retirement Statistics
- Special Notices
- Federal Ball Park Estimator
- FEGLI Calculator
- Tax Information for Annuitants
- Publications & Forms Toggle submenu   - Pamphlets
  - Retirement & Insurance Forms
  - Benefits Administration Letters
  - Financial Management Letters
  - Payroll Office Letters
  - CSRS/FERS Handbook
- Benefits Officers Center Toggle submenu   - List of Benefits Officers
  - Tools
  - Aids
  - FERS Election Options
  - Training
  - Reference Materials
- Pre-Retirement
- Post-Retirement
- Leaving the Government
- Survivor Benefits
- How to Make a Payment
- Quick Guide
- Contact Retirement
- Retirement Information Center
- Application Tips

### Resources For

          - New / Prospective Employees
          - Federal Employees
          - Retirees or Family Members
          - Benefits Officers

# Leaving the Government
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RYLAND M. JONES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 7 MM 2019

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 4th day of March , 2019, the Petition for Leave to File Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is GRANTED. Counsel is DIRECTED to file a

Petition for Allowance of Appeal within 15 days.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 14, 2007
 SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
    
    1-33412
    
    72-1264943(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3150
Houston, Texas 77002
 (713) 910-1875
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
  Item 2.03 Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangement of a Registrant.
   Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (c)
    
    The following exhibits are filed herewith:10.1
    
    Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2007 among the Company, as Borrower,
the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the
Companys Registration Statement onForm S-1 (Registration No. 333-136567)).10.2
    
    Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 14, 2007 among the
Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for itself, as Lender and as Administrative
Agent for the Lenders.




---



##### 



SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.Dated:  August 17, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Roger D. BurksRoger D. BurksExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



ExhibitNumber
    
    Description10.1
    
    Credit Agreement dated as of February 27, 2007 among the
Company, as Borrower, the lenders party thereto and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136567)).10.2
    
    Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of August 14,
2007 among the Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for
itself, as Lender and as Administrative Agent for the
Lenders.
#### HARDY v. STATE.

No. 15156.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1932.

Rehearing Denied April 6, 1932.

S. W. Pratt, of Cooper, and R. E. Eubank, of Paris, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for transporting intoxicating liquor, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of .exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, J.

Appellant moves for a rehearing on the ground that his attorney had applied for and obtained from the official court reporter a statement of facts, but had failed to file same within the time fixed by statute, and that he (appellant), being in jail, had no knowledge of the failure of his said attorney. This is to be regretted, but, in the wisdom of the lawmakers, no allowance is made in such cases for negligence on the part of the attorney who has been selected by the accused to represent him. The provisions of the statute are mandatory and require that the statement of facts be filed within ninety days after the giving of notice of appeal. Negligence and carelessness of one who is employed by one accused of crime cannot be offered as an excuse for failure to comply with the statutory requirement.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3673 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3673

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Secretary of 
 the Treasury to mail paper forms to any individual who filed a paper 
                 return for the preceding taxable year.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2015

 Mr. Benishek introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to require the Secretary of 
 the Treasury to mail paper forms to any individual who filed a paper 
                 return for the preceding taxable year.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PAPER FORMS MAILED TO INDIVIDUALS FILING PAPER RETURN FOR 
              PRECEDING TAXABLE YEAR.

    Section 6011(e) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by 
adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(5) Mailing of paper returns.--In the case of an 
        individual who for a taxable year files on paper forms a return 
        of tax imposed by subtitle A, the Secretary shall, not later 
        than 31 days after the close of the taxpayer's next taxable 
        year, mail to such taxpayer the paper forms (and related 
        instructions) necessary for filing such return of tax for such 
        next taxable year.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### State, Respondent, vs. Harrison (Ernest), Appellant.*

*October 12*

November *6, 1951.*

*Ray E. Lane*of Chicago, Illinois, and *Arnold W. Mulhern*of New Holstein, for the appellant.

For the respondent there was a brief by the *Attorney General, William A. Plats,*assistant attorney general, and *Martin Gulbrandsen,*district attorney of Vernon county, and oral argument by *Mr. Plats*and *Mr. Gulbrandsen.*

*

Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on January 8, 1952.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State v. Harrison,*ante, p. 89, 50 N. W. (2d) 38, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— Judgment and order affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2****Section 1350 Certification**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert C. Reeves, Chief Financial Officerof Encore Energy Partners GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;     and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.        Date: November 5, 2007 /s/ Robert C. Reeves   Robert C. Reeves   Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, and Treasurer of Encore EnergyPartners GP LLC, the General Partner ofEncore Energy Partners LP        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to thePartnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.     Note: The certification of the registrant furnished in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities ofthat Section. Registration Statements or other documents filed with the SEC shall not incorporatethis exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in such filing.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities Exchange Act of 1934

          - [Release No. 34-101207]

Development & Public Finance, LLC (CIK No. 1613281, SEC File No. 866-00124-00), hereinafter referred to as the “registrant,” is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) as a municipal advisor pursuant to Sections 15B(a)(1)(B) and 15B(a)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”).

                    On August 29, 2024, a Notice of Intention to Cancel Registration of Certain Municipal Advisors, including the registrant, was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     (Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-100815). The notice gave interested persons an opportunity to request a hearing and stated that an order or orders cancelling the registration would be issued unless a hearing was ordered. No request for a hearing has been filed by any persons (including registrant), and the Commission has not ordered a hearing.                

Pursuant to Section 15B(c)(3) of the Act, the Commission has found that registrant is no longer in existence or has ceased to do business as a municipal advisor.

Accordingly,

*It is ordered*, pursuant to Section 15B(c)(3) of the Act, that the registration of Development & Public Finance, LLC (CIK No. 1613281, SEC File No. 866-00124-00) be, and hereby is, cancelled.                

                        For the Commission, by the Office of Municipal Securities, pursuant to delegated authority.[1] 

Vanessa A. Countryman,

Secretary. 

# Footnotes

1.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3a(a)(1)(ii).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-22735 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

# TIME AND DATE:

4:04 p.m. on Tuesday, October 8, 2024.

# PLACE:

The meeting was held in the Board Room located on the sixth floor of the FDIC Building located at 550 17th Street NW, Washington, DC.

# STATUS:

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

The Board of Directors of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation met to consider matters related to the Corporation's corporate activities. In calling the meeting, the Board determined, on motion of Director Jonathan McKernan, seconded by Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), by the unanimous vote of Chairman Martin J. Gruenberg, Vice Chairman Travis Hill, Director Jonathan McKernan, Director Michael J. Hsu (Acting Comptroller of the Currency), and Director Rohit Chopra (Director, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau), that Corporation business required its consideration of the matters which were to be the subject of this meeting on less than seven days' notice to the public; that no earlier notice of the meeting was practicable; that the public interest did not require consideration of the matters in a meeting open to public observation; and that the matters could be considered in a closed meeting by authority of subsections (c)(2) and (c)(6), of the “Government in the Sunshine Act” (5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(2) and(c)(6)).

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Requests for further information concerning the meeting may be directed to Debra A. Decker, Executive Secretary of the Corporation, at 202-898-8748.

Dated this the 8th day of October, 2024.

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

James P. Sheesley,

Assistant Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-23688 Filed 10-9-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
TEEA~TORNEYGENERAL !.: ,, 

OF TEXAS 

AUS~N 11. -I%XAS 

FVILL.WILSON 

A-- GENERAL July 12, 1957 

Honorable A. C. Spencer 

Executive Director 

Opinion No. WV-97A 

Texas State Soil Conservation Board Re: Is the State Board of Water 

Temple, Texs s Engiaeers, under the State 

Laws, required to approve 

watershed plsns and the design and specifications ‘for 

individual structures in the 

Dear Mr. Spencer : plan 7 

On May 17, 1957, this Department rendered Opinion No, WW-97 

pcrtatning to the powers and duties of the Board of Water Engineers, and .in 

said opinion made reference to fresh water supply districts, under Articles 

7936 and 1799, V.C.S. 

Upon reconsideration of this opinion by the Bond Division and 

the Oil, Gas and Water Division of this Department, it has been decided 

that that part of the opinion pertaining to fresh water supply districts should 

be withdrawn. Therefore, we desire to delete from satd opinion the following phrases : 

(1) On Page 4, second line from the bottom, the phrase: “and 

(c) fresh water supply districts (Articles 7936 aad 7799).” 

(2) On Page 10, Section (b) under “Conclusions”, the phraac: 

@or fresh wakr supply district”. 

(3) On Page 11, the fourth and fifth lines, the phrase: “or 

fresh water supply district”. 
Honorable A. C. Spencer, Page 2 (WW-97A) 

With the above exceptions, the original Opinion No. WW-97 

is affirmed ss written. 

Very truly yours, 

WILL WILSON 

HB:tiw 

Houghton Brownlee, Jr. 

Assistant 

APPROVED: 

OPINION COMMITTEE: 

H. Grady Chandler, Chairman 

T. Lawrence Jones 

Elbert Morrow 

James W. Wilson 

PREVIEWED FOR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL 

BY: Geo. P. Blackburn
# L_2011078EN.01002101.xml

| 24.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 78/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 78/21

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 289/2011

of 23 March 2011

correcting the Hungarian text of Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 laying down common detailed rules for the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards buying in and selling of agricultural products under public intervention

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1), and in particular Article 43(a), (aa), (c), (d), (f), (j), (k), and(l) in conjunction with Article 4 thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The Hungarian text of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 (2) contains two errors which must be corrected with effect from the date of application of Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The Hungarian text of Commission Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009 (2) contains two errors which must be corrected with effect from the date of application of Regulation (EU) No 1272/2009.

| (2) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

(Concerns only the Hungarian language version.)

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from 1 March 2010.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 March 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 349, 29.12.2009, p. 1.

2

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with
the Quarterly Report of Envision Solar International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June
30, 2012 (the “Report”) I, Desmond Wheatley, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1)	The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)	The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

|                       |    
|---------------------- | ---
|Dated: August 14, 2012 | By:
|                       |    





This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended.