alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.15

Interests and Liabilities Agreement

of

Catlin Insurance Company Ltd.

Hamilton, Bermuda

(hereinafter referred to as the Subscribing Reinsurer)

with respect to the

Multi-Year Excess Catastrophe

Reinsurance Contract

Effective:
June 1, 2008

issued to

Homeowners Choice Property and Casualty Insurance Company

Port St. Lucie, Florida

and

any other insurance companies which are
now or

hereafter come under the ownership, control or management of

Homeowners Choice Property and Casualty Insurance Company

(hereinafter referred to
collectively as theCompany)

It Is Hereby Agreedthat the Subscribing Reinsurershall have a $2,485,500 part of the Per Loss
Occurrence Limit of Liability for all excess layers combined for each Contract Year share in the interests and liabilities of the Reinsurer as set forth in the attached Contract captioned above. As respects the Subscribing
Reinsurersshare in the attached Contract, at the beginning of each Contract Year the Subscribing Reinsurers$2,485,500 share shall be allocated by the Company between the excess layers for that Contract Year, and the amount
allocated to each excess layer shall be divided by the Reinsurers Per Loss Occurrence Limit of Liability for that Contract Year for that excess layer to determine the Subscribing Reinsurerspercentage share in the interests and
liabilities of the Reinsurer for that excess layer for that Contract Year. The Subscribing Reinsurerspercentage shares for the first Contract Year are agreed to be equal to the following:

12.0%    of the First Multi-Year Excess Catastrophe
Reinsurance         GA1000177598

11.0%    of the Second
Multi-Year Excess Catastrophe Reinsurance    GA9000177602

It Is Further Agreedthat this Agreement shall become effective on
June 1, 2008, and shall continue in force until May 31, 2011, both days inclusive, Local Standard Time at the location where the Loss Occurrence commences, unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of the attached
Contract.



|                         |  |     
|------------------------ |  | ----
|08IL\H3O1012 Page 1 of 2 |  | LOGO



---

It Is Also Agreed that the Subscribing Reinsurersshare in the attached Contract shall be separate
and apart from the shares of the other reinsurers, and shall not be joint with the shares of the other reinsurers, it being understood that the Subscribing Reinsurershall in no event participate in the interests and liabilities of the other
reinsurers.

In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto by their respective duly authorized representatives have executed this Agreement as of the dates
undermentioned at:

Port St. Lucie, Florida, this 
day of  in the
year.



| |  |                                                                                               
| |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | Homeowners Choice Property and Casualty Insurance Company (for and on behalf of the
Company)

Hamilton, Bermuda, this 25thday of July in the year 2008.

LOGO



|                         |  |     
|------------------------ |  | ----
|08IL\H3O1012 Page 2 of 2 |  | LOGO
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6246 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6246

**Commission Decision of 31/05/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6246 - OJSC NOVOLIPETSK STEEL / STEEL INVEST & FINANCE) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 31.5.2011

C(2011) 3946 final

PUBLIC VERSION

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6246 - OJSC NOVOLIPETSK STEEL / STEEL INVEST & FINANCE Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 28/04/2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which by which OJSC Novolipetsk Steel (“NLMK”, Russia) acquires sole control within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of Steel Invest & Finance (Luxembourg) S.A. (“SIF”, Luxembourg) by way of purchase of shares. SIF is presently under the indirect joint control of NLMK and Duferco Participations Holding Limited (Duferco). Concurrently with (or shortly following) the completion of the Transaction, certain businesses presently directly or indirectly controlled by SIF will be spun-off by the SIF group and will be transferred to [Duferco]*. The Spin-Off Businesses are: Carsid S.A., and the following assets and activities of Duferco La Louvière S.A. and its affiliates: the electric arc furnace and wire rod mill located at the company’s site at La Louvière, Belgium and the wire drawing line situated at the company’s site at Tildonk, Belgium [2] .

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

· NLMK: carbon steel semi-finished and finished flat products, carbon steel semi-finished and finished long products and electrical steel products;

· SIF: carbon steel semi-finished and finished flat products

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c)i/(c)ii/(d) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.*Should read: "Duferco Industrial Investment S.A. or its designee".

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 138, 07/05/2011, p.26.

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6851** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. DAVID BURNSIDE , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. Richard D. Bennett , District Judge. ( 1:05

- cr - 00586

- RDB

- 1; 1:15

- cv - 00020

- RDB )

Submitted : October 19, 2015 Decided: November 24, 2015

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. David Burnside, Appellant Pro Se. Paul Michael Cunningham, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: David Burnside seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not i ssue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that t he district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the priso ner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that
B urnside has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY

2000 TRAVERWOOD ROAD

ANN ARBOR, MI 48105-2498

 OFFICE OF

AIR AND RADIATION

July 21, 2011

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT: Meeting with Oshkosh and Pierce

FROM: Angela Cullen, Mechanical Engineer

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0162

This memorandum documents a meeting held on April 28, 2011 between Oshkosh, Pierce, DOT

and EPA staff. The following people attended:

Oshkosh: Roger Lackore

Pierce: Mike Power

DOT: Coralie Cooper, Maurice Hicks

EPA: Byron Bunker, Cle Jackson, Cheryl Bynum, and Angela Cullen

The discussion focused on the following:

 Utility needs of fire trucks

 Tires used on fire trucks

 Airport Rescue Fire Fighting vehicles

 Needs of other vocational vehicles such as concrete mixers, refuse haulers, recovery

vehicles, snow plows, and emergency vehicles

 Exemptions for exports
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2921

To provide for management and leadership training, the provision of assistance and resources for policy analysis, and other appropriate activities

in the training of Native American and Alaska Native professionals

in health care and public policy.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2000

Mr. MCCAIN (for himself and Mr. INOUYE) introduced the following bill; which

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public

Works

A BILL

To provide for management and leadership training, the provision of assistance and resources for policy analysis,

and other appropriate activities in the training of Native

American and Alaska Native professionals in health care

and public policy.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. MORRIS K. UDALL SCHOLARSHIP AND EXCEL4 LENCE IN NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POL5 ICY FOUNDATION.

6 (a) AUTHORITY.—Section 6(7) of the Morris K.

7 Udall Scholarship and Excellence in National Environ-
2

•S 2921 IS

1 mental and Native American Public Policy Act of 1992

2 (20 U.S.C. 5604(7)) is amended by inserting before the

3 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, by conducting man4 agement and leadership training of Native Americans,

5 Alaska Natives, and others involved in tribal leadership,

6 providing assistance and resources for policy analysis, and

7 carrying out other appropriate activities.’’.

8 (b) ADMINISTRATIVE PROVISIONS.—Section 12(b) of

9 the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in Na10 tional Environmental and Native American Public Policy

11 Act of 1992 (20 U.S.C. 5608(b)) is amended by inserting

12 before the period at the end the following: ‘‘and to the

13 activities of the Foundation under section 6(7)’’.

14 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section

15 13 of the Morris K. Udall Scholarship and Excellence in

16 National Environmental and Native American Public Pol17 icy Act of 1992 (20 U.S.C. 5609) is amended by adding

18 at the end the following:

19 ‘‘(c) TRAINING OF PROFESSIONALS IN HEALTH CARE

20 AND PUBLIC POLICY.—There is authorized to be appro21 priated to carry out section 6(7) $12,300,000 for the 5-

22 year period beginning with the first fiscal year that begins

23 after the date of enactment of this subsection.’’.

Æ
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 342 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military commissary and 

exchange store privileges, without time-period limitation, to members 

of the Armed Forces who are involuntarily separated with a serviceconnected disability and also to extend such privileges to their dependents. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2015 

Mr. DENHAM (for himself and Mr. KINZINGER of Illinois) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to extend military 

commissary and exchange store privileges, without timeperiod limitation, to members of the Armed Forces who 

are involuntarily separated with a service-connected disability and also to extend such privileges to their dependents. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 342 IH

1 SECTION 1. COMMISSARY AND EXCHANGE STORE PRIVI2 LEGES FOR INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED 

3 MEMBERS WITH A SERVICE-CONNECTED DIS4 ABILITY AND FOR THEIR DEPENDENTS. 

5 (a) EXTENSION OF PRIVILEGES.—Section 1146 of 

6 title 10, United States Code, is amended by adding at the 

7 end the following new subsection: 

8 ‘‘(d) MEMBERS INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED WITH

9 SERVICE-CONNECTED DISABILITY; DEPENDENTS.—(1) A 

10 member of the armed forces who is involuntarily separated 

11 from active duty or the Selected Reserve and who has a 

12 service-connected disability shall be permitted to use com13 missary and exchange stores on the same basis as a mem14 ber of the armed forces entitled to retired or retainer pay. 

15 ‘‘(2) A dependent of a member described in para16 graph (1) shall be permitted to use commissary and ex17 change stores on the same basis as a dependent of a mem18 ber of the armed forces entitled to retired or retainer 

19 pay.’’. 

20 (b) IMPLEMENTATION.—The Secretary of Defense 

21 shall ensure that subsection (d) of section 1146 of title 

22 10, United States Code, as added by subsection (a), is 

23 fully operational before the end of the 90-day period begin24 ning on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): January 1, 2008
 SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
  Delaware
    
    0-20310
    
    75-2379388(State or other jurisdiction)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)
 1105 Peters Road, Harvey, Louisiana
    
    70058(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
  Item 8.01. Other Events.
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  10.1
    
    Employment Agreement between Superior Energy Services, Inc. and Patrick J.
Zuber, dated January 1, 2008.10.2
    
    Employment Agreement between Superior Energy Services, Inc. and Charles Hardy,
dated January 1, 2008.99.1
    
    Press release issued by Superior Energy Services, Inc., dated January 7, 2008.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.By:
    

/s/ Robert S. TaylorRobert S. TaylorChief Financial Officer
*This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the

citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under

the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

Filed 7/30/96

TENTH CIRCUIT

HENRY FLOYD BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 96-6029

v. (W.D. Oklahoma)

RON THOMPSON,

Respondent - Appellee.

(D.C. No. CIV-95-426-M) 

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

Before ANDERSON, BARRETT, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this

appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34 (a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered

submitted without oral argument.

Henry Floyd Brown appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ

of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Brown contends that he is being illegally
- 2 -

detained in federal custody because his 1968 federal sentence of twenty years for bank

robbery and other crimes allegedly was to be concurrent with his existing life sentence for

murder, imposed by the State of Kansas. He was paroled from the state sentence in 1991. 

Contrary to Brown’s contentions, the official record of his federal sentence specifies that

it is consecutive to any state sentence. The judgment and commitment reads as follows:

It is ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby committed to the

custody of the Attorney General or his authorized representative for

imprisonment for a period of twenty (20) years which sentence is to run

consecutive to any sentence now being served and any sentence heretofor[e]

imposed and to be served.

R. Vol. I, Tab 6, Gov’t Ex. 1 (emphasis added). 

Brown attempts to overcome this official document by casting doubts on its

authenticity, citing to various allegedly contrary notations in administrative files, an FBI

report, documents from Kansas state officials, and by claiming that he remembers the

judge saying something else from the bench. None of these conclusory and collateral

arguments overcome the plain language of the judgment and commitment or provide any

legitimate basis to doubt its accuracy. See Tijerina v. Thornburgh, 884 F.2d 861, 865 (8th

Cir. 1989) (“Federal courts must go beyond the sentencing order of the district court

judge to clarify an ‘ambiguous’ sentence only where the sentencing judge himself creates

the ambiguity by issuing an equivocal order.”); see also Lionel v. Day, 430 F. Supp. 384,

386 (W.D. Okla. 1976) (“Obviously no comment or order by a state judge can control the

service of a federal sentence.”).
- 3 -

Having carefully reviewed the record and having fully considered Brown’s

arguments, we AFFIRM the dismissal for substantially the same reasons set out in the

Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge, which the district court adopted. 

R. Vol. I, Tabs 11 & 13. 

ENTERED FOR THE COURT

Stephen H. Anderson

Circuit Judge
EXHIBIT 32.2



WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with Quarterly Report of Lihua International,
Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Daphne Yan Huang, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b)
or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Dated: August 9,  2012 | By:                              | /s/ Daphne Yan Huang
|---------------------- | -------------------------------- | --------------------
|                       | Name: Daphne Yan Huang          
|                       | Title:   Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.1




---



##### 



First Supplemental
Indenture Company Trustee
  Indenture Notes
  Merger
Agreement Olin Merger Sub Merger Common Stock
    Additional Shares Stock Price




---



##### 



(b)
    
    Section 15.04 of the Indenture is hereby amended to read in its entirety as
follows:
  (c)
    
    The fourteenth paragraph of the Reverse of the Notes is hereby amended to read:




---



##### 








---



##### 



PIONEER COMPANIES, INC.By:
    /s/ George H. PainName:
    George H. PainTitle:
    Vice President and SecretaryWELL FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as TrusteeBy:
    /s/ Tim MowdyName:
    Tim MowdyTitle:
    Vice President
# L_2011289EN.01001201.xml

| 8.11.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 289/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.11.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 289/12

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1120/2011

of 31 October 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Carciofo Brindisino (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Carciofo Brindisino’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Italy’s application to register the name ‘Carciofo Brindisino’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 31 October 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 29, 29.1.2011, p. 27.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

ITALY

Carciofo Brindisino (PGI)

---
**EXHIBIT 3.1****T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.****(A Delaware Corporation)****AMENDMENT TO BYLAWS**     The Bylaws of T-3 Energy Services, Inc. (the “Corporation”) were adopted by the board ofdirectors of the Corporation on December 17, 2001.     This Amendment to the Bylaws has been declared advisable by the board of directors and dulyexecuted and acknowledged by the officers of the Corporation in accordance with Section 109 of theGeneral Corporation Law of the State of Delaware and Article IX, Section 7 of the Bylaws.     The text of the Bylaws of the Corporation is hereby amended by amending and restating ArticleIII, Section 7 in its entirety to state as follows:     “Section 7. Chairman of the Board and Vice Chairman of the Board. The board of directors mayelect a Chairman of the Board who shall preside at meetings of the board of directors andstockholders and who may be, but shall not be required to be, an officer of the Corporation. Theboard of directors may also elect a Vice Chairman of the Board who, in the absence or disability ofthe Chairman of the Board, shall perform the duties and exercise the powers of the Chairman of theBoard and who may be, but shall not be required to be, an officer of the Corporation.”     Except as expressly modified and amended herein, all of the terms and conditions of the Bylawsshall remain in full force and effect.     I, the undersigned Secretary of T-3 Energy Services, Inc., hereby certify that the foregoingis a true and correct copy of the Amendment to the Bylaws of said Corporation, adopted by the boardof directors of the Corporation on the 2nd of November, 2007.         By:  /s/ Michael T. Mino   Name:   Michael T. Mino   Title:   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary