alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. DARRELL EUGENE WASHINGTON, Defendant - Appellant. No. 16-4001 (D.C. No. 1:02-CR-00034-DB-1) (D. Utah)

________________ _________________ ORDER

________________ _________________ Before MATHESON , McKAY , and O’BRIEN , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Darrell Eugene Washington appeals the dist rict court’s denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. But while this appeal was pending, the district court vacated Mr. Washington’s sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, rendering this appeal
moot. See United States v. Moore , 83 F.3d 1231, 1235 (10th Cir. 1996) (when a sentence is vacated under § 2255 , “the original sentence . . . is eviscerated”). We therefore grant Mr. Washi ngton’s motion to dismiss. We grant Mr. Washington’s motion to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs or fees. The relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1), does not permit litigants to avoid payment of filing and docketing fees, only prepayment of those fees. Although we FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### November 3, 2016
Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 have dismissed this appeal, Mr. Washington remains obligated to pay all filing and docketing fees. He is directed to pay the fees in full to the clerk of the district court.

Entered for the Court
Monroe G. McKay Circuit Judge
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3590 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3590

 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 
  the income threshold used in determining the deduction for medical 
                                 care.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 22, 2015

 Ms. McSally (for herself, Ms. Ros-Lehtinen, Mr. Gibson, Mr. Bishop of 
  Michigan, Mr. Olson, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Mr. MacArthur, Mr. Webster of 
Florida, Ms. Sinema, Ms. Jenkins of Kansas, Mr. Dold, and Mr. Smith of 
  Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal the increase in 
  the income threshold used in determining the deduction for medical 
                                 care.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Halt Tax Increases on the Middle 
Class and Seniors Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN INCOME THRESHOLD FOR DETERMINING MEDICAL 
              CARE DEDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--Section 213(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``10 percent'' and inserting ``7.5 
percent''.
    (b) Conforming Amendments.--
            (1) Section 213 of such Code is amended by striking 
        subsection (f).
            (2) Section 56(b)(1)(B) of such Code is amended by striking 
        ``without regard to subsection (f) of such section'' and 
        inserting ``by substituting `10 percent' for `7.5 percent'''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2014.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National American University Holdings,
Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Ronald ShapeRonald L. Shape, Ed. D.Chief Financial Officer
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 Current Report
Filed Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report
(Date of earliest event reported): February 8, 2008
 Repros Therapeutics Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    001-15281
    
    76-0233274(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)incorporation or organization)
 2408 Timberloch Place, Suite B-7
The Woodlands, Texas 77380
(Address of principal
executive offices
and zip code)
(281) 719-3400
(Registrants telephone
number, including area
code)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure
 th
 th
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release dated February 8, 200899.2
    
    Press Release dated February 8, 2008




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  Repros Therapeutics Inc.Date: February 11, 2008By:
    
    /s/
Louis Ploth, Jr.Louis Ploth, Jr.Vice President, Business Development andChief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release dated February 8, 200899.2
    
    Press Release dated February 8, 2008
Order entered November 4 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00257
- CR ROY GLENN WHITTAKER, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F12
- 62953
- J



### O RDER In his brief, appellant raises an issue related to the costs assessed against him. The record, however, does not contain a cost bill or other document with an itemized list of costs assessed in this case. Accordingly, w e ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, a supplemental clerk’s record containing a detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, a nd court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill shall be signed by the officer who charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost. We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s record include adocument explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court

appointed attorney fee.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsi mmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wei Shi, certify that:





1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Toyota Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trust (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);


2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;


4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on the information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and Wells Fargo Delaware Trust Company, National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.











March 21, 2013                                                                           By:  /S/ WEI SHI





Wei Shi







Toyota Auto Finance Receivables LLC, as Depositor


(Senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)





- 10 -
##### 



SECOND AMENDMENT TO WATERGATHERING AND DISPOSAL AGREEMENT
  RECITALS
   AGREEMENT
  Amendment to Section 3.1.
 3.1     Producer shall pay Gatherer a fee of $0.53 per barrel for gathering, separation and disposal of water
until the Trust terminates, at which point Producer shall pay Gatherer a fee of $1.00 per barrel for gathering, separation
and disposal of water.
 Ratification




---



##### 



GATHERER:
ROBINSONS BEND OPERATING COMPANY, LLC
(as successor in interest to
Torch Energy Associates Ltd.)By:
    /s/ Dennis HammondName:
    Dennis HammondTitle:
    VPPRODUCER:
EVERLAST ENERGY LLC
(as successor in interest to
Velasco Gas Company Ltd.)By:
    /s/ Dennis HammondName:
    Dennis HammondTitle:
    VP -2-
EXHIBIT 32.01

Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the quarterly report on
Form 10-Q of LaPorte Bancorp, Inc. (the Registrant) for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the undersigned hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | Such Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|             |  |  |  |                                                                                               
|------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|             |  | 
|May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Lee A. Brady                                                                              
|Date         |  |  |  | Lee A. Brady President and Chief Executive Officer LaPorte Bancorp, Inc.                      
|             |  | 
|May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Michele M. Thompson                                                                       
|Date         |  |  |  | Michele M. Thompson Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer LaPorte Bancorp,
Inc.

This certification accompanies each report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Registrant for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Presidential Documents

Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 199 / Tuesday, October 15, 2024 / Presidential Documents 83417 

Notice of October 11, 2024 

Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Significant Narcotics Traffickers Centered in Colombia 

On October 21, 1995, by Executive Order 12978, the President declared 

a national emergency pursuant to the International Emergency Economic 

Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the 

United States constituted by the actions of significant narcotics traffickers 

centered in Colombia and the extreme level of violence, corruption, and 

harm such actions cause in the United States and abroad. 

The actions of significant narcotics traffickers centered in Colombia continue 

to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign 

policy, and economy of the United States and cause an extreme level of 

violence, corruption, and harm in the United States and abroad. For this 

reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12978 of October 

21, 1995, must continue in effect beyond October 21, 2024. Therefore, in 

accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 

1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect 

to significant narcotics traffickers centered in Colombia declared in Executive 

Order 12978. 

This notice shall be published in the Federal Register and transmitted to 

the Congress. 

THE WHITE HOUSE, 

October 11, 2024. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23965 

Filed 10–11–24; 2:00 pm] 

Billing code 3395–F4–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PRESDOC3BIDEN.EPS</GPH>
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judg ments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### APR 25 2000 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
DARLENE QUINN,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,

Defendant-Appellee. No. 99-6296 (D.C. No. 99-CV-500-T) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before TACHA , EBEL , and BRISCOE , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Plaintiff Darlene Quinn, proceeding pro se, broughtthis action against the Internal Revenue Service alleging that it was liabl e for various acts related to-2-

other individuals’ use of her social security numbe r on their tax returns. On the government’s motion, the district court determined that plaintiff had failed to state a claim on which relief could be granted, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), and dismissed the action with prejudice. Plaintiff app eals. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review the dismissal of a complaint under Rule 12(b)(6) de novo. See Sutton v. Utah State Sch. for the Deaf & Blind , 173 F.3d 1226, 1236 (10th Cir. 1999). We have fully considered plaintiff’s argume nts on appeal and reviewed the record, and we are not persuaded that the distr ict court erred. Therefore, for substantially the same reasons as stated in the dis trict court’s July 6, 1999 order, we affirm the district court’s dismissal of plainti ff’s claims. AFFIRMED.

Entered for the Court

Deanell Reece Tacha Circuit Judge
#### ARMSTRONG v. STATE.

No. 17998.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 12, 1936.

Wright Stubbs, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without bills of exception or statement of facts. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment is affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 281 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 281

 To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to clarify that forced or indentured 
            labor includes forced or indentured child labor.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1999

  Mr. Harkin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Tariff Act of 1930 to clarify that forced or indentured 
            labor includes forced or indentured child labor.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. FORCED OR INDENTURED CHILD LABOR.

    Section 307 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1307) is amended 
by adding at the end the following new sentence: ``For purposes of this 
section, the term `forced labor or/and indentured labor' includes 
forced or indentured child labor.''.
                                 <all>
```
# L_2012077DE.01002301.xml

| 16.3.2012 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 77/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2012

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 77/23

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 798/2011 der Kommission vom 9. August 2011 zur Genehmigung des Wirkstoffs Oxyfluorfen gemäß der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1107/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über das Inverkehrbringen von Pflanzenschutzmitteln sowie zur Änderung des Anhangs der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) Nr. 540/2011 der Kommission und der Entscheidung 2008/934/EG der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 205 vom 10. August 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 205 vom 10. August 2011

Seite 11, Artikel 2 Absatz 2 Buchstabe b:

anstatt:

„... durch die der oder die betreffende(n) Wirkstoff(e) in Anhang I der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG aufgenommen wurde(n); maßgebend ist das späteste Datum.“

muss es heißen:

„... durch die der oder die betreffende(n) Wirkstoff(e) in Anhang I der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG aufgenommen bzw. genehmigt wurde(n); maßgebend ist das späteste Datum.“

Seite 12, Anhang I, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“, Teil B:

anstatt:

| „(5) | Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftbegrenzung eignen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(5)

Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftbegrenzung eignen.“

muss es heißen:

| „(5) | Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftminderung eignen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(5)

Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftminderung eignen.“

Seite 14, Anhang II, letzte Spalte der Tabelle, Teil B:

anstatt:

| „(5) | Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftbegrenzung eignen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(5)

Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftbegrenzung eignen.“

muss es heißen:

| „(5) | Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftminderung eignen.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(5)

Expositionsdaten für die Reihenanwendung, die sich als Werte für die Driftminderung eignen.“

---
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal EmployeesRetirement Group Life Health Benefits RetirementSystem Insurance Program System

United States

Office ofPersonnel ManagementThe Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance ServiceFinancial Management Letter

                                                  Number: F-00-02 Date: February 8, 2000

SUBJECT: HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIUM CONVERSION

Employees in the private sector, the Judiciary Branch of Government, the U.S. Postal Service,and certain other Federal entities have benefit of what is termed a health benefits “premiumconversion”.  This means that the taxable incomes of the affected employees are reduced bythe amount withheld from their basic pay for health benefits purposes.  Because their taxableincome is reduced, these employees pay less Federal income, Social Security and Medicaretaxes.

On February 7, 2000, the President announced that “premium conversion” would be extendedto all employees in the Executive Branch of the Government who are covered by the FederalEmployees Health Benefits Program (FEHB).  Thus, the effect will be that the taxable incomesof covered employees will be reduced by the amount withheld from their basic pay for FEHB. It is anticipated that implementation of “premium conversion” will be required by October 1,2000.

We have attached a series of questions and answers about “premium conversion” for yourinformation.  We will provide you with more specific guidance, as it becomes available.  If youshould have any questions call (202) 606-0606, or email at finance@opm.gov.

 Robert A. Yuran, ChiefFinancial Policy StaffRetirement and Insurance Service                       

Attachments