alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 1986 

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 96-202 Date: April 18, 1996 

SUBJECT: Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance

Revision of SF 2818, Continuation of Life Insurance Coverage

___________________________________________________________________________

Date of Revision The revised form is dated February 1996.

___________________________________________________

Purpose of The form has been revised to include tear-off instructions

Revision and to provide a copy of the form for both the employing office

and the retiring employee. The form has also been revised to

require retiring employees to sign and date the section

concerning continuation of optional insurance, to explain the

effect of having elected a Living Benefit, and to separate out the

pre-65 and post-65 premium withholdings.

___________________________________________________

When Available The revised SF 2818 will be ready May 10, 1996, from

GSA/FSS using the normal FEDSTRIP/MILSTRIP procedures

as specified by your agency's procurement or acquisitions office.

___________________________________________________

Previous Editions Previous editions are not usable.

___________________________________________________

Stock Number The National Stock Number (NSN) for the SF 2818 is

7540-01-231-5585.

___________________________________________________________________________

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy 

 and Information Division
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AIR ALLIANCE HOUSTON, et al.

,

Plaintiff s

,

v.

GINA McCARTHY, Administrator, United

States Environ mental Protection Agency, in

her official capacity

,

Defendant. )

)

)

)

) Case No. 12

- 1607 (RMC)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

EPA’s NOTICE OF LODGING PROPOSED CONSENT DECREE

Defendant Gina McCarthy, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States

Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA” or “Defendant”)

, 1

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g) and Paragraph 14 of the proposed Consent Decree, after

the proposed Consent Decree is lodged with the Court, EPA will submit a notice of the proposed

Consent Decree for publication in the Federal Register , and will then accept public comment on

the proposed Consent Decr ee for 30 days. After the close of the public comment period, EPA with this notice lodges with the

Court a propos ed consent decree that contains the terms of a proposed settlement between EPA

and Plaintiff Sierra Club. See Exhibit 1. The proposed Consent Decree should not be signed or

entered by the Court at this time.

1 P ursuant to F ED

. R. C IV

. P. 25(d), Administrator Gina McCarthy is automatically substituted for

forme r Acting Administrator Bob Perciasepe

. Case 1:12-cv-01607-RMC Document 15 Filed 08/02/13 Page 1 of 32 will review the comments and will move the Court for entry of the proposed Consent Decree if

appropriate in light of the comments received.

Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g), the United States reserves the right to withhold or

withdraw its consent to the entry of the proposed Consent Decree if the comments received

disclose facts which indicate that the proposed judgment is inappropriate, improper, or

inadequate. At the close of the publ ic comment period, EPA will further advise the Court of the

status of its consent to the proposed Consent Decree.

Respectfully submitted,

ROBERT G. DREHER

Acting Assistant Attorney General

Environment & Natural Resources Division

_____/s/ Michele L. Walter

_______________ MICHELE L. WALTER , D.C. Bar No. 487329

United States Department of Justice

Environment & Natural Resources Division

P.O. Box 7611

Washington, D.C. 20044

Tel: (202) 514

- 2795

E

- mail: michele.walter@usdoj.gov

Counsel for Defendant EPA

DATED: A u g u s t 2 , 2013 Case 1:12-cv-01607-RMC Document 15 Filed 08/02/13 Page 2 of 33 C E R T I F I C A T E O F S E R V I C E

T h e u n d e r s i g n e d h e r e b y c e r t i f i e s t h a t o n A u g u s t 2

, 2 0 1 3

, t h e f o r e g o i n g w a s s e r v e d o n c a l l

c o u n s e l o f r e c o r d b y t h e E C F s y s t e m

.

______ /

s / M i c h e l e L

. W a l t e r

______ ____ M I C H E L E L

. W A L T E R Case 1:12-cv-01607-RMC Document 15 Filed 08/02/13 Page 3 of 3
1

Opinion issued August 31, 2023

In The



## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00384
- CV

——————————— THANH N. HUYNH and KHAI T. TRAN , Appellants /Cross
- Appellees V. THINH T. MAI, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF ATPC GROUP, LLC D/B/A AUTOTECH COLLISION, Appellee/ Cross
Appellant

On Appeal from the 190th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2019
- 18860

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellants /Cross

- Appellees Thanh N. Huynh and Khai T. Tran , and Appellee/ Cross

- Appellant Thinh T. Mai, Individually a nd Derivatively o n Behalf of2

ATPC Group, L LC d /

b / a Autotech Collision , filed an Agreed Motion to Dismiss Appeal, representing “the parties successfully mediated this matter on June 14, 2023, and [] finalized a settlement. Pursuant to the settlement, all parties wish to dismiss this appeal in its entirety, including all cross

- appeals.” We grant the motion and dismiss the appeal and cross

- a ppeal. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f). We deny any pending motions as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Goodman, Rivas

- Molloy, and Guerra.
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6236 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6236

**Commission Decision of 27/06/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6236 - DANA / BOSCH REXROTH / DANA REXROTH TRANSMISSION SERVICES JV) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 27.6.2011

C(2011) 4711 final

PUBLIC VERSION

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties: | |

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/ M.6236 - DANA/ BOSCH REXROTH/ DANA REXROTH TRANSMISSION SERVICES JV Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 24.05.2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertakings Dana Holding Corporation ('Dana', United States) and Bosch Rexroth (Germany) belonging to the Bosch Group acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the undertaking Dana Rexroth Transmission Services S.r.l., ('the Joint Venture', Italy) by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture [2] .

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Dana: manufacture and sale of automotive and truck components,

- Bosch Rexroth: manufacture and sale of drive and control solutions for a range of industries,

- The Joint Venture: manufacture and sale of a new type of transmission for off-highway vehicles.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5 (a) and (c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 161, 31.5.2011, p. 6.

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madero, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mike Lizarraga, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
14th day of August, 2007.


/s/ Mike Lizarraga
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
# L_2011066EN.01000901.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/9

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 238/2011

of 11 March 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Zázrivský korbáčik (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovakia’s application to register the name ‘Zázrivský korbáčik’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Slovakia’s application to register the name ‘Zázrivský korbáčik’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 188, 13.7.2010, p. 20.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.3.   Cheeses

SLOVAKIA

Zázrivský korbáčik (PGI)

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BRYNN WAYNE GRIFFIN,

Petitioner

v.

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF

ALLEGHENY COUNTY, ET AL.,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 42 WM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 23rd day of August

, 2017, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus and/or

Extraordinary Relief and the Application for Leave to File a Reply are DENIED.
Attachment 3: Specific Plan Contacts for Ordering FEDVIP Brochures and 

Organizing Open Season Fairs 

Dental Plan 

Name

Contact Information Plan Type

Aetna Danine Fapka

FapkaD@aetna.com

(215) 775-6339

Nationwide/International

GEHA openseasons@geha.com Nationwide/International

MetLife http://federaldental.metlife.com/HRTOOLKIT Nationwide/International

United 

Concordia 

Brochure requests - ucfedvip@ucci.com

Donna Denby

(732) 260-7377

donna.denby@ucci.com

www.uccifedvip.com

Nationwide/International

Humana

Dental 

Company

Brochure requests - openseason@humana.com

Rachelle (Shelly) Baumgart, PMP

Program Manager | I2I PMO

Humana

1100 Employers Blvd. 

Green Bay, WI 54344

(920) 337 8068

openseason@humana.com

Regional - Alabama, Arizona

Arkansas, California District 

of Columbia, Colorado,

Florida, Georgia, Illinois, 

Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, 

Louisiana, Missouri, 

Mississippi, North Carolina, 

Ohio, Oklahoma, South 

Carolina, Tennessee, Texas,

Utah, Virginia, West 

Virginia and parts of 

Maryland

GHI Elvin Boulden 

eboulden@emblemhealth.com

(646) 447-5003 or

Jane Chan

jchan@emblemhealth.com

(646)447-5013

Regional - All of New York 

State as well as some Zip 

Codes in Pennsylvania, 

Connecticut and New Jersey

Triple-S, 

Salude

Efraín Cárdenas 

ecardenas@ssspr.com

(787) 273-1110 ext 2144

Regional - Island of Puerto 

Rico

 

 
Vision Plan 

Name

Contact Information Plan Type

FEP BlueVision Please contact your local BCBS representative

to schedule Open Season Wellness events.

Contact Cathy.lewis@bcbsa.com for FEDVIP 

brochures.

Nationwide/International

UnitedHealthcare 

Vision 

FEDVIP@uhc.com

Attn: Sue Unger

(410) 692-2550

Nationwide/International

VSP (Vision 

Services Plan) 

FederalBenefitFairRequest@vsp.com

David Steckbeck

(916) 851-6119

Nationwide/International
Featured           First-of-its-kind integrated dataset enables genes-to-ecosystems research         

Featured           DOE Office of Science director visits ORNL climate research facilities         

Featured           Microalgae vs. mercury         

# Biogeochemical Dynamics

##  

## Delivering predictive understanding of environmental processes that control nutrients, trace elements, and contaminant transformations

The Biogeochemical Dynamics Group delivers a predictive understanding of the processes that govern the fate and transformation of trace elements, nutrients, and contaminants in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems over a broad range of spatiotemporal scales to advance DOE’s energy and environmental mission.

Our multi-disciplinary team—which includes expertise in hydrology, geochemistry, microbiology, and biophysics—takes advantage of Oak Ridge National Laboratory's world-class experimental and computational facilities (i.e., neutron scattering, high performance computing resources, advanced imaging, and field-scale facilities and infrastructure) to generate foundational knowledge that  addresses pressing environmental challenges impacting air, water, and land resources globally.

 

## Current Research

## News

First-of-its-kind integrated dataset enables genes-to-ecosystems research

## News

DOE Office of Science director visits ORNL climate research facilities

## News

Microalgae vs. mercury

## News

Scientists find iron cycling key to permafrost greenhouse gas emissions
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

October 12, 1999 Session

MARIE HAWKS v. MICHAEL C. GREENE, COMMISSIONER

OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY

Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County

No. 98-1320-III Ellen Hobbs Lyle, Chancellor

No. M1999-02785-COA-R3-CV - Filed December 18, 2001

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., concurring in the result.

I concur with the court’s conclusion that the forfeiture of Ms. Hawks’s van was excessive

in light of two considerations. First, the offense triggering the forfeiture of Ms. Hawks’s van

occurred after the twelve-month suspension of her driving privileges when she was entitled to

reinstatement of her license by complying with the conditions in Tenn. Code Ann. § 55-12-114(c)

(Supp. 2001). Second, while forfeiture of a vehicle is authorized when a driver’s license was

revoked as a result of a DUI conviction, it is not authorized when a driver’s license has been revoked

for graver offenses such as vehicular assault or vehicular homicide or even a second violation of

driving on a revoked license.

_____________________________

WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., JUDGE
(logo) Rialto

       CAPITAL

 

 

2015 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of November 1, 2012 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Torchlight Loan Services LLC, U.S. Bank National Association as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor relating to the COMM 2012-CCRE4 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates **(COMM 2012-CCRE4)**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2016
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2017

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-5 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Ron TremblayName:

Ron TremblayTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2017




---

<for SEMT 2012-5>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated
October 30, 2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 35.4



|     |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services
 MAC R1204-010
9062 Old Annapolis Road Columbia, MD 21045
 Tel: 410 884 2000
Fax: 410 715 2380

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich
Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-5 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-5
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

March 1, 2016



|                             
|-----------------------------
|LOGO                         
|Kristen Cronin Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
#### DILLARD v. STATE.

No. 19290.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 30, 1938.

A. W. Cameron, of Corpus Christi, F. G. Garza, of Falfurrias, and Epperson & Bridges, of Mission, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of extortion and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the State Penitentiary for a term of two years.

In this case, as in the case of “Chon” Martinez v. State, 114 S.W.2d 874, recently decided by this court but not yet reported [in State report], we are confronted with the question of the selection of a grand jury by a jury commission which was appointed by the judge during the term of court at which the indictment was returned.

Appellant made a motion to quash the indictment because the judge had arbitrarily disregarded article 333 Vernon’s Ann.C. C.P., in the appointment of a jury commission to select a grand jury; that he had consistently done so since he was first installed into office. At a-hearing of the motion, the court admitted that he had disregarded article 333 in the interest of economy and for that reason had resorted to article 348 C.C.P. It further appears from the record that, at the time the jury commissioners were appointed to select the grand jury for said term of court, appellant was not under arrest or under a complaint of any kind and. no charges whatsoever had been filed against him.

It is obvious that the appellant did not have an opportunity to challenge the grand jury at the time they were impaneled. It further appears that, after he was indicted, he in due time filed a motion to quash the indictment for the reasons stated.

*416The identical question was presented to this court in the case of Martinez v. State, supra, and was there discussed at length.

For the reasons there stated, the judgment of conviction in this case is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.