```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2796 Engrossed Amendment House (EAH)]

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      October 19, 2000.

    Resolved, That the bill from the Senate (S. 2796) entitled ``An Act to 
provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, to 
authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for 
improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other 
purposes'', do pass with the following

                               AMENDMENT:

            Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert:

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE; TABLE OF CONTENTS.

    (a) Short Title.--This Act may be cited as the ``Water Resources 
Development Act of 2000''.
    (b) Table of Contents.--

Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.
Sec. 2. Definition of Secretary.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

Sec. 101. Project authorization.
Sec. 102. Small projects for flood damage reduction.
Sec. 103. Small project for bank stabilization.
Sec. 104. Small projects for navigation.
Sec. 105. Small project for improvement of the quality of the 
                            environment.
Sec. 106. Small projects for aquatic ecosystem restoration.
Sec. 107. Small project for shoreline protection.
Sec. 108. Small project for snagging and sediment removal.
Sec. 109. Petaluma River, Petaluma, California.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

Sec. 201. Cost sharing of certain flood damage reduction projects.
Sec. 202. Harbor cost sharing.
Sec. 203. Nonprofit entities.
Sec. 204. Rehabilitation of Federal flood control levees.
Sec. 205. Flood mitigation and riverine restoration program.
Sec. 206. Tribal partnership program.
Sec. 207. Native American reburial and transfer authority.
Sec. 208. Ability to pay.
Sec. 209. Interagency and international support authority.
Sec. 210. Property protection program.
Sec. 211. Engineering consulting services.
Sec. 212. Beach recreation.
Sec. 213. Performance of specialized or technical services.
Sec. 214. Design-build contracting.
Sec. 215. Independent review pilot program.
Sec. 216. Enhanced public participation.
Sec. 217. Monitoring.
Sec. 218. Reconnaissance studies.
Sec. 219. Fish and wildlife mitigation.
Sec. 220. Wetlands mitigation.
Sec. 221. Credit toward non-Federal share of navigation projects.
Sec. 222. Maximum program expenditures for small flood control 
                            projects.
Sec. 223. Feasibility studies and planning, engineering, and design.
Sec. 224. Administrative costs of land conveyances.
Sec. 225. Dam safety.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

Sec. 301. Nogales Wash and Tributaries, Nogales, Arizona.
Sec. 302. John Paul Hammerschmidt Visitor Center, Fort Smith, Arkansas.
Sec. 303. Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 304. Ten- and Fifteen-Mile Bayous, Arkansas.
Sec. 305. Cache Creek basin, California.
Sec. 306. Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, California.
Sec. 307. Norco Bluffs, Riverside County, California.
Sec. 308. Sacramento deep water ship channel, California.
Sec. 309. Sacramento River, Glenn-Colusa, California.
Sec. 310. Upper Guadalupe River, California.
Sec. 311. Brevard County, Florida.
Sec. 312. Fernandina Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 313. Tampa Harbor, Florida.
Sec. 314. East Saint Louis and vicinity, Illinois.
Sec. 315. Kaskaskia River, Kaskaskia, Illinois.
Sec. 316. Waukegan Harbor, Illinois.
Sec. 317. Cumberland, Kentucky.
Sec. 318. Lock and Dam 10, Kentucky River, Kentucky.
Sec. 319. Saint Joseph River, South Bend, Indiana.
Sec. 320. Mayfield Creek and tributaries, Kentucky.
Sec. 321. Amite River and tributaries, East Baton Rouge Parish, 
                            Louisiana.
Sec. 322. Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System, Louisiana.
Sec. 323. Atchafalaya River, Bayous Chene, Boeuf, and Black Louisiana.
Sec. 324. Red River Waterway, Louisiana.
Sec. 325. Thomaston Harbor, Georges River, Maine.
Sec. 326. Breckenridge, Minnesota.
Sec. 327. Duluth Harbor, Minnesota.
Sec. 328. Little Falls, Minnesota.
Sec. 329. Poplar Island, Maryland.
Sec. 330. New York Harbor and adjacent channels, Port Jersey, New 
                            Jersey.
Sec. 331. Passaic River basin flood management, New Jersey.
Sec. 332. Times Beach nature preserve, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 333. Garrison Dam, North Dakota.
Sec. 334. Duck Creek, Ohio.
Sec. 335. Astoria, Columbia River, Oregon.
Sec. 336. Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and Mississippi.
Sec. 337. Bowie County levee, Texas.
Sec. 338. San Antonio Channel, San Antonio, Texas.
Sec. 339. Buchanan and Dickenson Counties, Virginia.
Sec. 340. Buchanan, Dickenson, and Russell Counties, Virginia.
Sec. 341. Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia.
Sec. 342. Wallops Island, Virginia.
Sec. 343. Columbia River, Washington.
Sec. 344. Mount St. Helens sediment control, Washington.
Sec. 345. Renton, Washington.
Sec. 346. Greenbrier Basin, West Virginia.
Sec. 347. Lower Mud River, Milton, West Virginia.
Sec. 348. Water quality projects.
Sec. 349. Project reauthorizations.
Sec. 350. Continuation of project authorizations.
Sec. 351. Declaration of nonnavigability for Lake Erie, New York.
Sec. 352. Project deauthorizations.
Sec. 353. Wyoming Valley, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 354. Rehoboth Beach and Dewey Beach, Delaware.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

Sec. 401. Studies of completed projects.
Sec. 402. Watershed and river basin assessments.
Sec. 403. Lower Mississippi River resource assessment.
Sec. 404. Upper Mississippi River basin sediment and nutrient study.
Sec. 405. Upper Mississippi River comprehensive plan.
Sec. 406. Ohio River System.
Sec. 407. Eastern Arkansas.
Sec. 408. Russell, Arkansas.
Sec. 409. Estudillo Canal, San Leandro, California.
Sec. 410. Laguna Creek, Fremont, California.
Sec. 411. Lake Merritt, Oakland, California.
Sec. 412. Lancaster, California.
Sec. 413. Napa County, California.
Sec. 414. Oceanside, California.
Sec. 415. Suisun Marsh, California.
Sec. 416. Lake Allatoona Watershed, Georgia.
Sec. 417. Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 418. Chicago sanitary and ship canal system, Chicago, Illinois.
Sec. 419. Long Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 420. Brush and Rock Creeks, Mission Hills and Fairway, Kansas.
Sec. 421. Coastal areas of Louisiana.
Sec. 422. Iberia Port, Louisiana.
Sec. 423. Lake Pontchartrain seawall, Louisiana.
Sec. 424. Lower Atchafalaya basin, Louisiana.
Sec. 425. St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana.
Sec. 426. Las Vegas Valley, Nevada.
Sec. 427. Southwest Valley, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Sec. 428. Buffalo Harbor, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 429. Hudson River, Manhattan, New York.
Sec. 430. Jamesville Reservoir, Onondaga County, New York.
Sec. 431. Steubenviille, Ohio.
Sec. 432. Grand Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 433. Columbia Slough, Oregon.
Sec. 434. Reedy River, Greenville, South Carolina.
Sec. 435. Germantown, Tennessee.
Sec. 436. Park City, Utah.
Sec. 437. Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Sec. 438. Upper Des Plaines River and tributaries, Illinois and 
                            Wisconsin.
Sec. 439. Delaware River watershed.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

Sec. 501. Bridgeport, Alabama.
Sec. 502. Duck River, Cullman, Alabama.
Sec. 503. Seward, Alaska.
Sec. 504. Augusta and Devalls Bluff, Arkansas.
Sec. 505. Beaver Lake, Arkansas.
Sec. 506. McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation system, Arkansas and 
                            Oklahoma.
Sec. 507. Calfed Bay Delta program assistance, California.
Sec. 508. Clear Lake basin, California.
Sec. 509. Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California.
Sec. 510. Huntington Beach, California.
Sec. 511. Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California.
Sec. 512. Penn Mine, Calaveras County, California.
Sec. 513. Port of San Francisco, California.
Sec. 514. San Gabriel basin, California.
Sec. 515. Stockton, California.
Sec. 516. Port Everglades, Florida.
Sec. 517. Florida Keys water quality improvements.
Sec. 518. Ballard's Island, La Salle County, Illinois.
Sec. 519. Lake Michigan Diversion, Illinois.
Sec. 520. Koontz Lake, Indiana.
Sec. 521. Campbellsville Lake, Kentucky.
Sec. 522. West View Shores, Cecil County, Maryland.
Sec. 523. Conservation of fish and wildlife, Chesapeake Bay, Maryland 
                            and Virginia.
Sec. 524. Muddy River, Brookline and Boston, Massachusetts.
Sec. 525. Soo Locks, Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan.
Sec. 526. Duluth, Minnesota, alternative technology project.
Sec. 527. Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sec. 528. St. Louis County, Minnesota.
Sec. 529. Wild Rice River, Minnesota.
Sec. 530. Coastal Mississippi wetlands restoration projects.
Sec. 531. Missouri River Valley improvements.
Sec. 532. New Madrid County, Missouri.
Sec. 533. Pemiscot County, Missouri.
Sec. 534. Las Vegas, Nevada.
Sec. 535. Newark, New Jersey.
Sec. 536. Urbanized peak flood management research, New Jersey.
Sec. 537. Black Rock Canal, Buffalo, New York.
Sec. 538. Hamburg, New York.
Sec. 539. Nepperhan River, Yonkers, New York.
Sec. 540. Rochester, New York.
Sec. 541. Upper Mohawk River basin, New York.
Sec. 542. Eastern North Carolina flood protection.
Sec. 543. Cuyahoga River, Ohio.
Sec. 544. Crowder Point, Crowder, Oklahoma.
Sec. 545. Oklahoma-tribal commission.
Sec. 546. Columbia River, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 547. John Day Pool, Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 548. Lower Columbia River and Tillamook Bay estuary program, 
                            Oregon and Washington.
Sec. 549. Skinner Butte Park, Eugene, Oregon.
Sec. 550. Willamette River basin, Oregon.
Sec. 551. Lackawanna River, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 552. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 553. Access improvements, Raystown Lake, Pennsylvania.
Sec. 554. Upper Susquehanna River basin, Pennsylvania and New York.
Sec. 555. Chickamauga Lock, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
Sec. 556. Joe Pool Lake, Texas.
Sec. 557. Benson Beach, Fort Canby State Park, Washington.
Sec. 558. Puget Sound and adjacent waters restoration, Washington.
Sec. 559. Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe, Willapa Bay, Washington.
Sec. 560. Wynoochee Lake, Wynoochee River, Washington.
Sec. 561. Snohomish River, Washington.
Sec. 562. Bluestone, West Virginia.
Sec. 563. Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp, West Virginia.
Sec. 564. Tug Fork River, West Virginia.
Sec. 565. Virginia Point Riverfront Park, West Virginia.
Sec. 566. Southern West Virginia.
Sec. 567. Fox River system, Wisconsin.
Sec. 568. Surfside/Sunset and Newport Beach, California.
Sec. 569. Illinois River basin restoration.
Sec. 570. Great Lakes.
Sec. 571. Great Lakes remedial action plans and sediment remediation.
Sec. 572. Great Lakes dredging levels adjustment.
Sec. 573. Dredged material recyling.
Sec. 574. Watershed management, restoration, and development.
Sec. 575. Maintenance of navigation channels.
Sec. 576. Support of Army civil works program.
Sec. 577. National recreation reservation service.
Sec. 578. Hydrographic survey.
Sec. 579. Lakes program.
Sec. 580. Perchlorate.
Sec. 581. Abandoned and inactive noncoal mine restoration.
Sec. 582. Release of use restriction.
Sec. 583. Comprehensive environmental resources protection.
Sec. 584. Modification of authorizations for environmental projects.
Sec. 585. Land transfers.
Sec. 586. Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area 
                            Wilderness, Minnesota.
Sec. 587. Waurika Lake, Oklahoma.
Sec. 588. Columbia River Treaty fishing access.
Sec. 589. Devils Lake, North Dakota.

             TITLE VI--COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION

Sec. 601. Comprehensive Everglades restoration plan.
Sec. 602. Sense of Congress concerning Homestead Air Force Base.

                 TITLE VIII--MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION

Sec. 701. Definitions.
Sec. 702. Missouri River Trust.
Sec. 703. Missouri River Task Force.
Sec. 704. Administration.
Sec. 705. Authorization of appropriations.

SEC. 2. DEFINITION OF SECRETARY.

    In this Act, the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of the 
Army.

                   TITLE I--WATER RESOURCES PROJECTS

SEC. 101. PROJECT AUTHORIZATION.

    (a) Projects With Chief's Reports.--The following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject to the conditions, described in 
the respective reports designated in this subsection:
            (1) Barnegat inlet to little egg inlet, new jersey.--The 
        project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Barnegat 
        Inlet to Little Egg Inlet, New Jersey: Report of the Chief of 
        Engineers dated July 26, 2000, at a total cost of $51,203,000, 
        with an estimated Federal cost of $33,282,000 and an estimated 
        non-Federal cost of $17,921,000.
            (2) Port of new york and new jersey, new york and new 
        jersey.--
                    (A) In general.--The project for navigation, Port 
                of New York and New Jersey, New York and New Jersey: 
                Report of the Chief of Engineers dated May 2, 2000, at 
                a total cost of $1,781,235,000, with an estimated 
                Federal cost of $738,631,000 and an estimated non-
                Federal cost of $1,042,604,000.
                    (B) Credit.--The Secretary may provide the non-
                Federal interests credit toward cash contributions 
                required--
                            (i) before, during, and after construction 
                        for planning, engineering and design, and 
                        construction management work that is performed 
                        by the non-Federal interests and that the 
                        Secretary determines is necessary to implement 
                        the project; and
                            (ii) during and after construction for the 
                        costs of the construction that the non-Federal 
                        interests carry out on behalf of the Secretary 
                        and that the Secretary determines is necessary 
                        to implement the project.
    (b) Projects Subject to Final Report.--The following projects for 
water resources development and conservation and other purposes are 
authorized to be carried out by the Secretary substantially in 
accordance with the plans, and subject the conditions, recommended in a 
final report of the Chief of Engineers if a favorable report of the 
Chief is completed not later than December 31, 2000:
            (1) False pass harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        False Pass Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $15,164,000, with 
        an estimated Federal cost of $8,238,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $6,926,000.
            (2) Unalaska harbor, alaska.--The project for navigation, 
        Unalska Harbor, Alaska, at a total cost of $20,000,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $8,000,000.
            (3) Rio de flag, flagstaff, arizona.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Rio de Flag, Flagstaff, Arizona, at a total 
        cost of $24,072,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $15,576,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $8,496,000.
            (4) Tres rios, arizona.--The project ecosystem restoration, 
        Tres Rios, Arizona, at a total cost of $99,320,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $62,755,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $36,565,000.
            (5) Los angeles harbor, california.--The project for 
        navigation, Los Angeles Harbor, California, at a total cost of 
        $153,313,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $43,735,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $109,578,000.
            (6) Murrietta creek, california.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction and ecosystem restoration, Murrietta Creek, 
        California, described as alternative 6, based on the District 
        Engineer's Murrietta Creek feasibility report and environmental 
        impact statement dated October 2000, at a total cost of 
        $89,850,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $57,735,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $32,115,000. The locally 
        preferred plan described as alternative 6 shall be treated as a 
        final favorable report of the Chief Engineer's for purposes of 
        this subsection.
            (7) Santa barbara streams, lower mission creek, 
        california.--The project for flood damage reduction, Santa 
        Barbara streams, Lower Mission Creek, California, at a total 
        cost of $18,300,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $9,200,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,100,000.
            (8) Upper newport bay, california.--The project for 
        ecosystem restoration, Upper Newport Bay, California, at a 
        total cost of $32,475,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $21,109,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,366,000.
            (9) Whitewater river basin, california.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Whitewater River basin, California, at 
        a total cost of $27,570,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $17,920,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,650,000.
            (10) Delaware coast from cape henlopen to fenwick island.--
        The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, Delaware 
        Coast from Cape Henlopen to Fenwick Island, at a total cost of 
        $5,633,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $3,661,000 and an 
        estimated non-Federal cost of $1,972,000.
            (11) Port sutton, florida.--The project for navigation, 
        Port Sutton, Florida, at a total cost of $6,000,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $4,000,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $2,000,000.
            (12) Barbers point harbor, hawaii.--The project for 
        navigation, Barbers Point Harbor, Hawaii, at a total cost of 
        $30,003,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $18,524,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,479,000.
            (13) John myers lock and dam, indiana and kentucky.--The 
        project for navigation, John Myers Lock and Dam, Indiana and 
        Kentucky, at a total cost of $182,000,000. The costs of 
        construction of the project shall be paid \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ 
        from amounts appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (14) Greenup lock and dam, kentucky and ohio.--The project 
        for navigation, Greenup Lock and Dam, Kentucky and Ohio, at a 
        total cost of $175,000,000. The costs of construction of the 
        project shall be paid \1/2\ from amounts appropriated from the 
        general fund of the Treasury and \1/2\ from amounts 
        appropriated from the Inland Waterways Trust Fund.
            (15) Ohio river mainstem, kentucky, illinois, indiana, 
        ohio, pennsylvania, and west virginia.--Projects for ecosystem 
        restoration, Ohio River Mainstem, Kentucky, Illinois, Indiana, 
        Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia, at a total cost of 
        $307,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $200,000,000 
        and an estimated non-Federal cost of $107,700,000.
            (16) Monarch-chesterfield, missouri.--The project for flood 
        damage reduction, Monarch-Chesterfield, Missouri, at a total 
        cost of $67,700,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $44,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $23,700,000.
            (17) Antelope creek, lincoln, nebraska.--The project for 
        flood damage reduction, Antelope Creek, Lincoln, Nebraska, at a 
        total cost of $49,788,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $24,894,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $24,894,000.
            (18) Sand creek watershed, wahoo, nebraska.--The project 
        for ecosystem restoration and flood damage reduction, Sand 
        Creek watershed, Wahoo, Nebraska, at a total cost of 
        $29,212,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $17,586,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,626,000.
            (19) Western sarpy and clear creek, nebraska.--The project 
        for flood damage reduction, Western Sarpy and Clear Creek, 
        Nebraska, at a total cost of $20,600,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $13,390,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $7,210,000.
            (20) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, cliffwood beach, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Cliffwood Beach, New Jersey, at 
        a total cost of $5,219,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $3,392,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $1,827,000.
            (21) Raritan bay and sandy hook bay, port monmouth, new 
        jersey.--The project for hurricane and storm damage reduction, 
        Raritan Bay and Sandy Hook Bay, Port Monmouth, New Jersey, at a 
        total cost of $32,064,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
        $20,842,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $11,222,000.
            (22) Dare county beaches, north carolina.--The project for 
        hurricane and storm damage reduction, Dare County beaches, 
        North Carolina, at a total cost of $69,518,000, with an 
        estimated Federal cost of $49,846,000 and an estimated non-
        Federal cost of $19,672,000.
            (23) Wolf river, tennessee.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Wolf River, Tennessee, at a total cost of 
        $10,933,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $7,106,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $3,827,000.
            (24) Duwamish/green, washington.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Duwamish/Green, Washington, at a total cost of 
        $115,879,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $75,322,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $40,557,000.
            (25) Stillagumaish river basin, washington.--The project 
        for ecosystem restoration, Stillagumaish River basin, 
        Washington, at a total cost of $24,223,000, with an estimated 
        Federal cost of $16,097,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
        of $8,126,000.
            (26) Jackson hole, wyoming.--The project for ecosystem 
        restoration, Jackson Hole, Wyoming, at a total cost of 
        $52,242,000, with an estimated Federal cost of $33,957,000 and 
        an estimated non-Federal cost of $18,285,000.

SEC. 102. SMALL PROJECTS FOR FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of 
the following projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project 
is feasible, may carry out the project under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s):
            (1) Buffalo island, arkansas.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Buffalo Island, Arkansas.
            (2) Anaverde creek, palmdale, california.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Anaverde Creek, Palmdale, California.
            (3) Castaic creek, old road bridge, santa clarita, 
        california.--Project for flood damage reduction, Castaic Creek, 
        Old Road bridge, Santa Clarita, California.
            (4) Santa clara river, old road bridge, santa clarita, 
        california.--Project for flood damage reduction, Santa Clara 
        River, Old Road bridge, Santa Clarita, California.
            (5) Columbia levee, columbia, illinois.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Columbia Levee, Columbia, Illinois.
            (6) East-west creek, riverton, illinois.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, East-West Creek, Riverton, Illinois.
            (7) Prairie du pont, illinois.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Prairie Du Pont, Illinois.
            (8) Monroe county, illinois.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Monroe County, Illinois.
            (9) Willow creek, meredosia, illinois.--Project for flood 
        damage reduction, Willow Creek, Meredosia, Illinois.
            (10) Dykes branch channel, leawood, kansas.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Dykes Branch channel improvements, 
        Leawood, Kansas.
            (11) Dykes branch tributaries, leawood, kansas.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Dykes Branch tributary 
        improvements, Leawood, Kansas.
            (12) Kentucky river, frankfort, kentucky.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Kentucky River, Frankfort, Kentucky.
            (13) Lakes maurepas and pontchartrain canals, st. john the 
        baptist parish, louisiana.--Project for flood damage reduction, 
        Lakes Maurepas and Pontchartrain Canals, St. John the Baptist 
        Parish, Louisiana.
            (14) Pennsville township, salem county, new jersey.--The 
        project for flood damage reduction, Pennsville Township, Salem 
        County, New Jersey.
            (15) Hempstead, new york.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Hempstead, New York.
            (16) Highland brook, highland falls, new york.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Highland Brook, Highland Falls, New 
        York.
            (17) Lafayette township, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, Lafayette Township, Ohio.
            (18) West lafayette, ohio.--Project for flood damage 
        reduction, West LaFayette, Ohio.
            (19) Bear creek and tributaries, medford, oregon.--Project 
        for flood damage reduction, Bear Creek and tributaries, 
        Medford, Oregon.
            (20) Delaware canal and brock creek, yardley borough, 
        pennsylvania.--Project for flood damage reduction, Delaware 
        Canal and Brock Creek, Yardley Borough, Pennsylvania.
            (21) First creek, fountain city, knoxville, tennessee.--
        Project for flood damage reduction, First Creek, Fountain City, 
        Knoxville, Tennessee.
            (22) Mississippi river, ridgely, tennessee.--Project for 
        flood damage reduction, Mississippi River, Ridgely, Tennessee.
    (b) Magpie Creek, Sacramento County, California.--In formulating 
the project for Magpie Creek, California, authorized by section 
102(a)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
281) to be carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), the Secretary shall consider benefits from the 
full utilization of existing improvements at McClellan Air Force Base 
that would result from the project after conversion of the base to 
civilian use.

SEC. 103. SMALL PROJECTS FOR BANK STABILIZATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 
1946 (33 U.S.C. 701r):
            (1) Maumee river, fort wayne, indiana.--Project for bank 
        stabilization, Maumee River, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
            (2) Bayou sorrell, iberville parish, louisiana.--Project 
        for bank stabilization, Bayou Sorrell, Iberville Parish, 
        Louisiana.

SEC. 104. SMALL PROJECTS FOR NAVIGATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is feasible, 
may carry out the project under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act 
of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
            (1) Whittier, alaska.--Project for navigation, Whittier, 
        Alaska.
            (2) Cape coral, florida.--Project for navigation, Cape 
        Coral, Florida.
            (3) East two lakes, tower, minnesota.--Project for 
        navigation, East Two Lakes, Tower, Minnesota.
            (4) Erie basin marina, buffalo, new york.--Project for 
        navigation, Erie Basin marina, Buffalo, New York.
            (5) Lake michigan, lakeshore state park, milwaukee, 
        wisconsin.--Project for navigation, Lake Michigan, Lakeshore 
        State Park, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
            (6) Saxon harbor, francis, wisconsin.--Project for 
        navigation, Saxon Harbor, Francis, Wisconsin.

SEC. 105. SMALL PROJECT FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE QUALITY OF THE 
              ENVIRONMENT.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for improvement 
of the quality of the environment, Nahant Marsh, Davenport, Iowa, and, 
if the Secretary determines that the project is appropriate, may carry 
out the project under section 1135(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a(a)).

SEC. 106. SMALL PROJECTS FOR AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for each of the following 
projects and, if the Secretary determines that a project is 
appropriate, may carry out the project under section 206 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330):
            (1) Arkansas river, pueblo, colorado.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Arkansas River, Pueblo, Colorado.
            (2) Hayden diversion project, yampa river, colorado.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Hayden Diversion 
        Project, Yampa River, Colorado.
            (3) Little econlockhatchee river basin, florida.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Little Econlockhatchee River 
        basin, Florida.
            (4) Loxahatchee slough, palm beach county, florida.--
        Project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Loxahatchee Slough, 
        Palm Beach County, Florida.
            (5) Stevenson creek estuary, florida.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Stevenson Creek estuary, Florida.
            (6) Chouteau island, madison county, illinois.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chouteau Island, Madison County, 
        Illinois.
            (7) Saginaw bay, bay city, michigan.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Saginaw Bay, Bay City, Michigan.
            (8) Rainwater basin, nebraska.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Rainwater Basin, Nebraska.
            (9) Cazenovia lake, madison county, new york.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Cazenovia Lake, Madison County, 
        New York, including efforts to address aquatic invasive plant 
        species.
            (10) Chenango lake, chenango county, new york.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Chenango Lake, Chenango County, 
        New York, including efforts to address aquatic invasive plant 
        species.
            (11) Eagle lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Eagle Lake, New York.
            (12) Ossining, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Ossining, New York.
            (13) Saratoga lake, new york.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Saratoga Lake, New York.
            (14) Schroon lake, new york.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Schroon Lake, New York.
            (15) Middle cuyahoga river.--Project for aquatic ecosystem 
        restoration, Middle Cuyahoga River, Kent, Ohio.
            (16) Central amazon creek, eugene, oregon.--Project for 
        aquatic ecosystem restoration, Central Amazon Creek, Eugene, 
        Oregon.
            (17) Eugene millrace, eugene, oregon.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Eugene Millrace, Eugene, Oregon.
            (18) Lone pine and lazy creeks, medford, oregon.--Project 
        for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Lone Pine and Lazy Creeks, 
        Medford, Oregon.
            (19) Tullytown borough, pennsylvania.--Project for aquatic 
        ecosystem restoration, Tullytown Borough, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 107. SMALL PROJECT FOR SHORELINE PROTECTION.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for shoreline 
protection, Hudson River, Dutchess County, New York, and, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, may carry out the 
project under section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing 
Federal participation in the cost of protecting the shores of publicly 
owned property'', approved August 13, 1946 (33 U.S.C. 426g; 60 Stat. 
1056).

SEC. 108. SMALL PROJECT FOR SNAGGING AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study for a project for clearing, 
snagging, and sediment removal, Sangamon River and tributaries, 
Riverton, Illinois. If the Secretary determines that the project is 
feasible, the Secretary may carry out the project under section 2 of 
the Flood Control Act of August 28, 1937 (50 Stat. 177).

SEC. 109. PETALUMA RIVER, PETALUMA, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall carry out the Petaluma River 
project, at the city of Petaluma, Sonoma County, California, to provide 
a 100-year level of flood protection to the city in accordance with the 
detailed project report of the San Francisco District Engineer, dated 
March 1995, at a total cost of $32,227,000.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--Cost sharing for the project shall be determined 
in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(a)), as in effect on October 11, 1996.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
sponsor for any project costs that the non-Federal sponsor has incurred 
in excess of the non-Federal share of project costs, regardless of the 
date such costs were incurred.

                      TITLE II--GENERAL PROVISIONS

SEC. 201. COST SHARING OF CERTAIN FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION PROJECTS.

    Section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(n) Level of Flood Protection.--If the Secretary determines that 
it is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified, to construct a flood control project for an area using an 
alternative that will afford a level of flood protection sufficient for 
the area not to qualify as an area having special flood hazards for the 
purposes of the national flood insurance program under the National 
Flood Insurance Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.), the Secretary, at 
the request of the non-Federal interest, shall recommend the project 
using the alternative. The non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
assigned to providing the minimum amount of flood protection required 
for the area not to qualify as an area having special flood hazards 
shall be determined under subsections (a) and (b).''.

SEC. 202. HARBOR COST SHARING.

    (a) In General.--Sections 101 and 214 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 and 2241; 100 Stat. 4082-4084 
and 4108-4109) are each amended by striking ``45 feet'' each place it 
appears and inserting ``53 feet''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall 
apply only to a project, or separable element of a project, on which a 
contract for physical construction has not been awarded before the date 
of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 203. NONPROFIT ENTITIES.

    (a) Environmental Dredging.--Section 312 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 1272) is amended by adding at the 
end the following:
    ``(g) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-Federal sponsor for any 
project carried out under this section may include a nonprofit entity, 
with the consent of the affected local government.''.
    (b) Project Modifications for Improvement of Environment.--Section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) 
is amended by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f) and by 
inserting after subsection (d) the following:
    ``(e) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-Federal sponsor for any 
project carried out under this section may include a nonprofit entity, 
with the consent of the affected local government.''.
    (c) Lakes Program.--Section 602 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148-4149) is amended by redesignating 
subsection (d) as subsection (e) and by inserting after subsection (c) 
the following:
    ``(d) Nonprofit Entities.--Notwithstanding section 221 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b), a non-Federal sponsor for any 
project carried out under this section may include a nonprofit entity, 
with the consent of the affected local government.''.

SEC. 204. REHABILITATION OF FEDERAL FLOOD CONTROL LEVEES.

    Section 110(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 
Stat. 4622) is amended by striking ``1992,'' and all that follows 
through ``1996'' and inserting ``2001 through 2005''.

SEC. 205. FLOOD MITIGATION AND RIVERINE RESTORATION PROGRAM.

    Section 212(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 
U.S.C. 2332(e)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (22);
            (2) by striking the period at end of paragraph (23) and 
        inserting a semicolon;
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(24) Lester, St. Louis, East Savanna, and Floodwood 
        Rivers, Duluth, Minnesota;
            ``(25) Lower Hudson River and tributaries, New York;
            ``(26) Susquehanna River watershed, Bradford County, 
        Pennsylvania; and
            ``(27) Clear Creek, Harris, Galveston, and Brazoria 
        Counties, Texas.''.

SEC. 206. TRIBAL PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized, in cooperation with 
Indian tribes and other Federal agencies, to study and determine the 
feasibility of implementing water resources development projects that 
will substantially benefit Indian tribes, and are located primarily 
within Indian country (as defined in section 1151 of title 18, United 
States Code), or in proximity to an Alaska Native village (as defined 
in, or established pursuant to, the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
(43 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.)).
    (b) Consultation and Coordination.--The Secretary shall consult 
with the Secretary of the Interior on studies conducted under this 
section.
    (c) Credits.--For any study conducted under this section, the 
Secretary may provide credit to the Indian tribe for services, studies, 
supplies, and other in-kind consideration where the Secretary 
determines that such services, studies, supplies, and other in-kind 
consideration will facilitate completion of the study. In no event 
shall such credit exceed the Indian tribe's required share of the cost 
of the study.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal 
years 2002 through 2006. Not more than $1,000,000 appropriated to carry 
out this section for a fiscal year may be used to substantially benefit 
any one Indian tribe.
    (e) Indian Tribe Defined.--In this section, the term ``Indian 
tribe'' means any tribe, band, nation, or other organized group or 
community of Indians, including any Alaska Native village, which is 
recognized as eligible for the special programs and services provided 
by the United States to Indians because of their status as Indians.

SEC. 207. NATIVE AMERICAN REBURIAL AND TRANSFER AUTHORITY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in consultation with appropriate 
Indian tribes, may identify and set aside land at civil works projects 
managed by the Secretary for use as a cemetery for the remains of 
Native Americans that have been discovered on project lands and that 
have been rightfully claimed by a lineal descendant or Indian tribe in 
accordance with applicable Federal law. The Secretary, in consultation 
with and with the consent of the lineal descendant or Indian tribe, may 
recover and rebury the remains at such cemetery at Federal expense.
    (b) Transfer Authority.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
law, the Secretary may transfer to an Indian tribe land identified and 
set aside by the Secretary under subsection (a) for use as a cemetery. 
The Secretary shall retain any necessary rights-of-way, easements, or 
other property interests that the Secretary determines necessary to 
carry out the purpose of the project.
    (c) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``Indian tribe'' and 
``Native American'' have the meaning such terms have under section 2 of 
the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 
3001).

SEC. 208. ABILITY TO PAY.

    Section 103(m) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213(m)) is amended--
            (1) by striking paragraphs (1) and (2) and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(1) In general.--Any cost-sharing agreement under this 
        section for construction of an environmental protection and 
        restoration, flood control, or agricultural water supply 
        project shall be subject to the ability of a non-Federal 
        interest to pay.
            ``(2) Criteria and procedures.--The ability of a non-
        Federal interest to pay shall be determined by the Secretary in 
        accordance with criteria and procedures in effect under 
        paragraph (3) on the day before the date of enactment of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 2000; except that such 
        criteria and procedures shall be revised, and new criteria and 
        procedures shall be developed, within 180 days after such date 
        of enactment to reflect the requirements of such paragraph 
        (3).''; and
            (2) in paragraph (3)--
                    (A) by inserting ``and'' after the semicolon at the 
                end of subparagraph (A)(ii);
                    (B) by striking subparagraph (B); and
                    (C) by redesignating subparagraph (C) as 
                subparagraph (B).

SEC. 209. INTERAGENCY AND INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AUTHORITY.

    The first sentence of section 234(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2323a(d)) is amended to read as 
follows: ``There is authorized to be appropriated to carry out this 
section $250,000 per fiscal year for fiscal years beginning after 
September 30, 2000.''.

SEC. 210. PROPERTY PROTECTION PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary is authorized to implement a program 
to reduce vandalism and destruction of property at water resources 
development projects under the jurisdiction of the Department of the 
Army. In carrying out the program, the Secretary may provide rewards to 
individuals who provide information or evidence leading to the arrest 
and prosecution of individuals causing damage to Federal property, 
including the payment of cash rewards.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 4 years after the date of enactment of 
this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
results of the program.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $500,000 per fiscal year for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 2000.

SEC. 211. ENGINEERING CONSULTING SERVICES.

    In conducting a feasibility study for a water resources project, 
the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable, should not employ a 
person for engineering and consulting services if the same person is 
also employed by the non-Federal interest for such services unless 
there is only 1 qualified and responsive bidder for such services.

SEC. 212. BEACH RECREATION.

    (a) In General.--In studying the feasibility of and making 
recommendations concerning potential beach restoration projects, the 
Secretary may not implement any policy that has the effect of 
disadvantaging any such project solely because 50 percent or more of 
its benefits are recreational in nature.
    (b) Procedures for Consideration and Reporting of Benefits.--Not 
later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall develop and implement procedures to ensure that all of 
the benefits of a beach restoration project, including those benefits 
attributable to recreation, hurricane and storm damage reduction, and 
environmental protection and restoration, are adequately considered and 
displayed in reports for such projects.

SEC. 213. PERFORMANCE OF SPECIALIZED OR TECHNICAL SERVICES.

    (a) In General.--Before entering into an agreement to perform 
specialized or technical services for a State (including the District 
of Columbia), a territory, or a local government of a State or 
territory under section 6505 of title 31, United States Code, the 
Secretary shall certify that--
            (1) the services requested are not reasonably and 
        expeditiously available through ordinary business channels; and
            (2) the Corps of Engineers is especially equipped to 
        perform such services.
    (b) Supporting Materials.--The Secretary shall develop materials 
supporting such certification under subsection (a).
    (c) Annual Report to Congress.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than December 31 of each 
        calendar year, the Secretary shall transmit to the Committee on 
        Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of 
        Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
        Works of the Senate a report on the requests described in 
        subsection (a) that the Secretary received during such calendar 
        year.
            (2) Contents.--With respect to each request, the report 
        transmitted under paragraph (1) shall include a copy of the 
        certification and supporting materials developed under this 
        section and information on each of the following:
                    (A) The scope of services requested.
                    (B) The status of the request.
                    (C) The estimated and final cost of the requested 
                services.
                    (D) Each district and division office of the Corps 
                of Engineers that has supplied or will supply the 
                requested services.
                    (E) The number of personnel of the Corps of 
                Engineers that have performed or will perform any of 
                the requested services.
                    (F) The status of any reimbursement.

SEC. 214. DESIGN-BUILD CONTRACTING.

    (a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary may conduct a pilot program 
consisting of not more than 5 projects to test the design-build method 
of project delivery on various civil engineering projects of the Corps 
of Engineers, including levees, pumping plants, revetments, dikes, 
dredging, weirs, dams, retaining walls, generation facilities, mattress 
laying, recreation facilities, and other water resources facilities.
    (b) Design-Build Defined.--In this section, the term ``design-
build'' means an agreement between the Federal Government and a 
contractor that provides for both the design and construction of a 
project by a single contract.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of 
this section, the Secretary shall report on the results of the pilot 
program.

SEC. 215. INDEPENDENT REVIEW PILOT PROGRAM.

    Title IX of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4183 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

``SEC. 952. INDEPENDENT REVIEW PILOT PROGRAM.

    ``(a) Projects Subject to Independent Review.--The Secretary shall 
undertake a pilot program in fiscal years 2001 through 2003 to 
determine the practicality and efficacy of having feasibility reports 
of the Corps of Engineers for eligible projects reviewed by an 
independent panel of experts. The pilot program shall be limited to the 
establishment of panels for not to exceed 5 eligible projects.
    ``(b) Establishment of Panels.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish a panel of 
        experts for an eligible project under this section upon 
        identification of a preferred alternative in the development of 
        the feasibility report.
            ``(2) Membership.--A panel established under this section 
        shall be composed of not less than 5 and not more than 9 
        independent experts who represent a balance of areas of 
        expertise, including biologists, engineers, and economists.
            ``(3) Limitation on appointments.--The Secretary shall not 
        appoint an individual to serve on a panel of experts for a 
        project under this section if the individual has a financial 
        interest in the project or has with any organization a 
        professional relationship that the Secretary determines may 
        constitute a conflict of interest or the appearance of 
        impropriety.
            ``(4) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult the 
        National Academy of Sciences in developing lists of individuals 
        to serve on panels of experts under this section.
            ``(5) Compensation.--An individual serving on a panel of 
        experts under this section may not be compensated but may 
        receive travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of 
        subsistence, in accordance with sections 5702 and 5703 of title 
        5, United States Code.
    ``(c) Duties of Panels.--A panel of experts established for a 
project under this section shall--
            ``(1) review feasibility reports prepared for the project 
        after the identification of a preferred alternative;
            ``(2) receive written and oral comments of a technical 
        nature concerning the project from the public; and
            ``(3) transmit to the Secretary an evaluation containing 
        the panel's economic, engineering, and environmental analyses 
        of the project, including the panel's conclusions on the 
        feasibility report, with particular emphasis on areas of public 
        controversy.
    ``(d) Duration of Project Reviews.--A panel of experts shall 
complete its review of a feasibility report for an eligible project and 
transmit a report containing its evaluation of the project to the 
Secretary not later than 180 days after the date of establishment of 
the panel.
    ``(e) Recommendations of Panel.--After receiving a timely report on 
a project from a panel of experts under this section, the Secretary 
shall--
            ``(1) consider any recommendations contained in the 
        evaluation;
            ``(2) make the evaluation available for public review; and
            ``(3) include a copy of the evaluation in any report 
        transmitted to Congress concerning the project.
    ``(f) Costs.--The cost of conducting a review of a project under 
this section shall not exceed $250,000 and shall be a Federal expense.
    ``(g) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2003, the Secretary 
shall transmit to Congress a report on the results of the pilot program 
together with the recommendations of the Secretary regarding 
continuation, expansion, and modification of the pilot program, 
including an assessment of the impact that a peer review program would 
have on the overall cost and length of project analyses and reviews 
associated with feasibility reports and an assessment of the benefits 
of peer review.
    ``(h) Eligible Project Defined.--In this section, the term 
`eligible project' means--
            ``(1) a water resources project that has an estimated total 
        cost of more than $25,000,000, including mitigation costs; and
            ``(2) a water resources project--
                    ``(A) that has an estimated total cost of 
                $25,000,000 or less, including mitigation costs; and
                    ``(B)(i) that the Secretary determines is subject 
                to a substantial degree of public controversy; or
                    ``(ii) to which an affected State objects.''.

SEC. 216. ENHANCED PUBLIC PARTICIPATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 905 of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2282) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Enhanced Public Participation.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall establish procedures 
        to enhance public participation in the development of each 
        feasibility study under subsection (a), including, if 
        appropriate, establishment of a stakeholder advisory group to 
        assist the Secretary with the development of the study.
            ``(2) Membership.--If the Secretary provides for the 
        establishment of a stakeholder advisory group under this 
        subsection, the membership of the advisory group shall include 
        balanced representation of social, economic, and environmental 
        interest groups, and such members shall serve on a voluntary, 
        uncompensated basis.
            ``(3) Limitation.--Procedures established under this 
        subsection shall not delay development of any feasibility study 
        under subsection (a).''.

SEC. 217. MONITORING.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a monitoring program 
of the economic and environmental results of up to 5 eligible projects 
selected by the Secretary.
    (b) Duration.--The monitoring of a project selected by the 
Secretary under this section shall be for a period of not less than 12 
years beginning on the date of its selection.
    (c) Reports.--The Secretary shall transmit to Congress every 3 
years a report on the performance of each project selected under this 
section.
    (d) Eligible Water Resources Project Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``eligible project'' means a water resources project, or separable 
element thereof--
            (1) for which a contract for physical construction has not 
        been awarded before the date of enactment of this Act;
            (2) that has a total cost of more than $25,000,000; and
            (3)(A) that has as a benefit-to-cost ratio of less than 1.5 
        to 1; or
            (B) that has significant environmental benefits or 
        significant environmental mitigation components.
    (e) Costs.--The cost of conducting monitoring under this section 
shall be a Federal expense.

SEC. 218. RECONNAISSANCE STUDIES.

    Section 905(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2282(b)) is amended--
            (1) in the second sentence by inserting after 
        ``environmental impacts'' the following: ``(including whether a 
        proposed project is likely to have environmental impacts that 
        cannot be successfully or cost-effectively mitigated)''; and
            (2) by inserting after the second sentence the following: 
        ``The Secretary shall not recommend that a feasibility study be 
        conducted for a project based on a reconnaissance study if the 
        Secretary determines that the project is likely to have 
        environmental impacts that cannot be successfully or cost-
        effectively mitigated.''.

SEC. 219. FISH AND WILDLIFE MITIGATION.

    (a) Design of Mitigation Projects.--Section 906(d) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(1)'' and inserting ``(A)''; and
            (2) by striking ``(2)'' and inserting ``(B)'';
            (3) by striking ``(d) After the date'' and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(d) Mitigation Plans as Part of Project Proposals.--
            ``(1) In general.--After the date'';
            (4) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Design of mitigation projects.--The Secretary shall 
        design mitigation projects to reflect contemporary 
        understanding of the science of mitigating the adverse 
        environmental impacts of water resources projects.
            ``(3) Recommendation of projects.--The Secretary shall not 
        recommend a water resources project unless the Secretary 
        determines that the adverse impacts of the project on aquatic 
        resources and fish and wildlife can be cost-effectively and 
        successfully mitigated.''; and
            (5) by aligning the remainder of the text of paragraph (1) 
        (as designated by paragraph (3) of this subsection) with 
        paragraph (2) (as added by paragraph (4) of this subsection).
    (b) Concurrent Mitigation.--
            (1) Investigation.--The Comptroller General shall conduct 
        an investigation of the effectiveness of the concurrent 
        mitigation requirements of section 906 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2283). In conducting the 
        investigation, the Comptroller General shall determine whether 
        or not there are instances in which less than 50 percent of 
        required mitigation is completed before initiation of project 
        construction and the number of such instances.
            (2) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of 
        enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall transmit 
        to Congress a report on the results of the investigation.

SEC. 220. WETLANDS MITIGATION.

    In carrying out a water resources project that involves wetlands 
mitigation and that has an impact that occurs within the service area 
of a mitigation bank, the Secretary, to the maximum extent practicable 
and where appropriate, shall give preference to the use of the 
mitigation bank if the bank contains sufficient available credits to 
offset the impact and the bank is approved in accordance with the 
Federal Guidance for the Establishment, Use and Operation of Mitigation 
Banks (60 Fed. Reg. 58605 (November 28, 1995)) or other applicable 
Federal law (including regulations).

SEC. 221. CREDIT TOWARD NON-FEDERAL SHARE OF NAVIGATION PROJECTS.

    The second sentence of section 101(a)(2) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211(a)(2)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``paragraph (3) and'' and inserting 
        ``paragraph (3),''; and
            (2) by striking ``paragraph (4)'' and inserting ``paragraph 
        (4), and the costs borne by the non-Federal interests in 
        providing additional capacity at dredged material disposal 
        areas, providing community access to the project (including 
        such disposal areas), and meeting applicable beautification 
        requirements''.

SEC. 222. MAXIMUM PROGRAM EXPENDITURES FOR SMALL FLOOD CONTROL 
              PROJECTS.

    Section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) is 
amended by striking ``$40,000,000'' and inserting ``$50,000,000''.

SEC. 223. FEASIBILITY STUDIES AND PLANNING, ENGINEERING, AND DESIGN.

    Section 105(a)(1)(E) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 
(33 U.S.C. 2215(a)(1)(E)) is amended by striking ``Not more than \1/2\ 
of the'' and inserting ``The''.

SEC. 224. ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS OF LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
administrative costs associated with the conveyance of property to a 
non-Federal governmental or nonprofit entity shall be limited to not 
more than 5 percent of the value of the property to be conveyed to such 
entity if the Secretary determines, based on the entity's ability to 
pay, that such limitation is necessary to complete the conveyance. The 
Federal cost associated with such limitation shall not exceed $70,000 
for any one conveyance.
    (b) Specific Conveyance.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall give priority consideration to the conveyance of 10 
acres of Wister Lake project land to the Summerfield Cemetery 
Association, Wister, Oklahoma, authorized by section 563(f) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 359-360).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $150,000 for fiscal years 2001 
through 2003.

SEC. 225. DAM SAFETY.

    (a) Inventory and Assessment of Other Dams.--
            (1) Inventory.--The Secretary shall establish an inventory 
        of dams constructed by and using funds made available through 
        the Works Progress Administration, the Works Projects 
        Administration, and the Civilian Conservation Corps.
            (2) Assessment of rehabilitation needs.--In establishing 
        the inventory required under paragraph (1), the Secretary shall 
        also assess the condition of the dams on such inventory and the 
        need for rehabilitation or modification of the dams.
    (b) Report to Congress.--Not later than 2 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a 
report containing the inventory and assessment required by this 
section.
    (c) Interim Actions.--
            (1) In general.--If the Secretary determines that a dam 
        referred to in subsection (a) presents an imminent and 
        substantial risk to public safety, the Secretary is authorized 
        to carry out measures to prevent or mitigate against such risk.
            (2) Exclusion.--The assistance authorized under paragraph 
        (1) shall not be available to dams under the jurisdiction of 
        the Department of the Interior.
            (3) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        assistance provided under this subsection shall be 65 percent 
        of such cost.
    (d) Coordination.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall coordinate with the appropriate State dam safety officials and 
the Director of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section a total of $25,000,000 for 
fiscal years beginning after September 30, 1999, of which not more than 
$5,000,000 may be expended on any one dam.

                 TITLE III--PROJECT-RELATED PROVISIONS

SEC. 301. NOGALES WASH AND TRIBUTARIES, NOGALES, ARIZONA.

    The project for flood control, Nogales Wash and Tributaries, 
Nogales, Arizona, authorized by section 101(a)(4) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4606), and modified by 
section 303 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
3711), is further modified to provide that the Federal share of the 
costs associated with addressing flood control problems in Nogales, 
Arizona, arising from floodwater flows originating in Mexico shall be 
100 percent.

SEC. 302. JOHN PAUL HAMMERSCHMIDT VISITOR CENTER, FORT SMITH, ARKANSAS.

    Section 103(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4813) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Lake'' and 
        inserting ``Visitor Center''; and
            (2) in paragraph (1) by striking ``at the John Paul 
        Hammerschmidt Lake, Arkansas River, Arkansas'' and inserting 
        ``on property provided by the city of Fort Smith, Arkansas, in 
        such city''.

SEC. 303. GREERS FERRY LAKE, ARKANSAS.

    The project for flood control, Greers Ferry Lake, Arkansas, 
authorized by the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors for flood control, and other 
purposes'', approved June 28, 1938 (52 Stat. 1218), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to construct water intake facilities for the 
benefit of Lonoke and White Counties, Arkansas.

SEC. 304. TEN- AND FIFTEEN-MILE BAYOUS, ARKANSAS.

    The project for flood control, Saint Francis River Basin, Missouri 
and Arkansas, authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 
1950 (64 Stat. 172), is modified to expand the boundaries of the 
project to include Ten- and Fifteen-Mile Bayous near West Memphis, 
Arkansas. Notwithstanding section 103(f) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4086), the flood control work at 
Ten- and Fifteen-Mile Bayous shall not be considered separable elements 
of the project.

SEC. 305. CACHE CREEK BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Cache Creek Basin, California, 
authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1986 (100 Stat. 4112), is modified to direct the Secretary to evaluate 
the impacts of the new south levee of the Cache Creek settling basin on 
the city of Woodland's storm drainage system and to mitigate such 
impacts at Federal expense and a total cost of $2,800,000.

SEC. 306. LARKSPUR FERRY CHANNEL, LARKSPUR, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Larkspur Ferry Channel, Larkspur, 
California, authorized by section 601(d) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4148), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to prepare a limited reevaluation report to determine whether 
maintenance of the project is technically sound, environmentally 
acceptable, and economically justified. If the Secretary determines 
that maintenance of the project is technically sound, environmentally 
acceptable, and economically justified, the Secretary shall carry out 
the maintenance.

SEC. 307. NORCO BLUFFS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    Section 101(b)(4) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
(110 Stat. 3667) is amended by striking ``$8,600,000'' and all that 
follows through ``$2,150,000'' and inserting ``$15,000,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $11,250,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $3,750,000''.

SEC. 308. SACRAMENTO DEEP WATER SHIP CHANNEL, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water Ship Channel, 
California, authorized by section 202(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary to provide credit to the non-Federal interest toward the non-
Federal share of the cost of the project for the value of dredged 
material from the project that is purchased by public agencies or 
nonprofit entities for environmental restoration or other beneficial 
uses.

SEC. 309. SACRAMENTO RIVER, GLENN-COLUSA, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood control, Sacramento River, California, 
authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act to provide for the 
control of the floods of the Mississippi River and of the Sacramento 
River, California, and for other purposes'', approved March 1, 1917 (39 
Stat. 949), and modified by section 102 of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 1990 (103 Stat. 649), section 301(b)(3) 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3110), title 
I of the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1999 (112 
Stat. 1841), and section 305 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1999 (113 Stat. 299), is further modified to direct the Secretary to 
provide the non-Federal interest a credit of up to $4,000,000 toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for direct and 
indirect costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in carrying out 
activities (including the provision of lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
relocations, and dredged material disposal areas) associated with 
environmental compliance for the project if the Secretary determines 
that the activities are integral to the project. If any of such costs 
were incurred by the non-Federal interests before execution of the 
project cooperation agreement, the Secretary may reimburse the non-
Federal interest for such pre-agreement costs instead of providing a 
credit for such pre-agreement costs to the extent that the amount of 
the credit exceeds the remaining non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project.

SEC. 310. UPPER GUADALUPE RIVER, CALIFORNIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Upper 
Guadalupe River, California, authorized by section 101(a)(9) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 275), is modified to 
provide that the non-Federal share of the cost of the project shall be 
50 percent, with an estimated Federal cost and non-Federal cost of 
$70,164,000 each.

SEC. 311. BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA.

    (a) Inclusion of Reach.--The project for shoreline protection, 
Brevard County, Florida, authorized by section 101(b)(7) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3667), is modified to 
provide that, notwithstanding section 902 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986, the Secretary may incorporate in the project 
any or all of the 7.1-mile reach of the project that was deleted from 
the south reach of the project, as described in paragraph (5) of the 
Report of the Chief of Engineers, dated December 23, 1996, if the 
Secretary determines, in coordination with appropriate local, State, 
and Federal agencies, that the project as modified is technically 
sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.
    (b) Clarification.--Section 310(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 301) is amended by inserting 
``shoreline associated with the'' after ``damage to the''.

SEC. 312. FERNANDINA HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Fernandina Harbor, Florida, authorized 
by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations 
for the construction, repair, completion, and preservation of certain 
works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 
14, 1880 (21 Stat. 186), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
realign the access channel in the vicinity of the Fernandina Beach 
Municipal Marina 100 feet to the west. The cost of the realignment, 
including acquisition of lands, easements, rights-of-way, and dredged 
material disposal areas and relocations, shall be a non-Federal 
expense.

SEC. 313. TAMPA HARBOR, FLORIDA.

    The project for navigation, Tampa Harbor, Florida, authorized by 
section 4 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of September 22, 1922 (42 Stat. 
1042), is modified to authorize the Secretary to deepen and widen the 
Alafia Channel in accordance with the plans described in the Draft 
Feasibility Report, Alafia River, Tampa Harbor, Florida, dated May 
2000, at a total cost of $61,592,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
$39,621,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $21,971,000.

SEC. 314. EAST SAINT LOUIS AND VICINITY, ILLINOIS.

    The project for flood protection, East Saint Louis and vicinity, 
Illinois (East Side levee and sanitary district), authorized by section 
204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1082), is modified to 
include ecosystem restoration as a project purpose.

SEC. 315. KASKASKIA RIVER, KASKASKIA, ILLINOIS.

    The project for navigation, Kaskaskia River, Kaskaskia, Illinois, 
authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 
1175), is modified to include recreation as a project purpose.

SEC. 316. WAUKEGAN HARBOR, ILLINOIS.

    The project for navigation, Waukegan Harbor, Illinois, authorized 
by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations 
for the construction, repair, completion, and preservation of certain 
works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 
14, 1880 (21 Stat. 192), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
extend the upstream limit of the project 275 feet to the north at a 
width of 375 feet if the Secretary determines that the extension is 
feasible.

SEC. 317. CUMBERLAND, KENTUCKY.

    Using continuing contracts, the Secretary shall initiate 
construction of the flood control project, Cumberland, Kentucky, 
authorized by section 202(a) of the Energy and Water Development 
Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 1339), in accordance with option 4 
contained in the draft detailed project report of the Nashville 
District, dated September 1998, to provide flood protection from the 
100-year frequency flood event and to share all costs in accordance 
with section 103 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2213).

SEC. 318. LOCK AND DAM 10, KENTUCKY RIVER, KENTUCKY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may take all necessary measures to 
further stabilize and renovate Lock and Dam 10 at Boonesborough, 
Kentucky, with the purpose of extending the design life of the 
structure by an additional 50 years, at a total cost of $24,000,000, 
with an estimated Federal cost of $12,000,000 and an estimated non-
Federal cost of $12,000,000.
    (b) Definitions.--For purposes of this section, the term 
``stabilize and renovate'' includes the following activities: 
stabilization of the main dam, auxiliary dam and lock; renovation of 
all operational aspects of the lock; and elevation of the main and 
auxiliary dams.

SEC. 319. SAINT JOSEPH RIVER, SOUTH BEND, INDIANA.

    Section 321(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 303) is amended--
            (1) in the subsection heading by striking ``Total'' and 
        inserting ``Federal''; and
            (2) by striking ``total'' and inserting ``Federal''.

SEC. 320. MAYFIELD CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES, KENTUCKY.

    The project for flood control, Mayfield Creek and tributaries, 
Kentucky, carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), is modified to provide that the non-Federal 
interest shall not be required to pay the unpaid balance, including 
interest, of the non-Federal share of the cost of the project.

SEC. 321. AMITE RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH, 
              LOUISIANA.

    The project for flood damage reduction and recreation, Amite River 
and Tributaries, East Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, authorized by 
section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 277), is modified to provide that cost sharing for the project 
shall be determined in accordance with section 103(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213), as in effect on 
October 11, 1996.

SEC. 322. ATCHAFALAYA BASIN FLOODWAY SYSTEM, LOUISIANA.

    The Atchafalaya Basin Floodway System project, authorized by 
section 601 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 
4142), is modified to authorize the Secretary to construct the visitor 
center and other recreational features identified in the 1982 project 
feasibility report of the Corps of Engineers at or near the Lake End 
Park in Morgan City, Louisiana.

SEC. 323. ATCHAFALAYA RIVER, BAYOUS CHENE, BOEUF, AND BLACK, LOUISIANA.

    The project for navigation Atchafalaya River and Bayous Chene, 
Boeuf, and Black, Louisiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and 
Harbor Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 731), is modified to direct the Secretary 
to investigate the problems associated with the mixture of freshwater, 
saltwater, and fine river silt in the channel and to develop and carry 
out a solution to the problem if the Secretary determines that the work 
is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified.

SEC. 324. RED RIVER WATERWAY, LOUISIANA.

    The project for mitigation of fish and wildlife loses, Red River 
Waterway, Louisiana, authorized by section 601(a) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4142) and modified by 
section 4(h) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 Stat. 
4016), section 102(p) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 
(104 Stat. 4613), and section 301(b)(7) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3710), is further modified to 
authorize the Secretary to purchase mitigation lands in any of the 7 
parishes that make up the Red River Waterway District, including the 
parishes of Caddo, Bossier, Red River, Natchitoches, Grant, Rapides, 
and Avoyelles.

SEC. 325. THOMASTON HARBOR, GEORGES RIVER, MAINE.

    The project for navigation, Georges River, Maine (Thomaston 
Harbor), authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
making appropriations for the construction, repair, and preservation of 
certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', 
approved June 3, 1896 (29 Stat. 215), is modified to redesignate the 
following portion of the project as an anchorage area: The portion 
lying northwesterly of a line commencing at point N86,946.770, 
E321,303.830 thence running northeasterly about 203.67 feet to a point 
N86,994.750, E321,501.770.

SEC. 326. BRECKENRIDGE, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project for flood control, 
Breckenridge, Minnesota, carried out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s), shall be $10,500,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project described in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in the project in accordance with this section.

SEC. 327. DULUTH HARBOR, MINNESOTA.

    The project for navigation, Duluth Harbor, Minnesota, carried out 
under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), 
is modified to include the relocation of Scenic Highway 61, including 
any required bridge construction.

SEC. 328. LITTLE FALLS, MINNESOTA.

    The project for clearing, snagging, and sediment removal, East Bank 
of the Mississippi River, Little Falls, Minnesota, authorized under 
section 3 of the Act entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, 
repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, 
and for other purposes'', approved March 2, 1945 (33 U.S.C. 603a), is 
modified to direct the Secretary to construct the project substantially 
in accordance with the plans contained in the feasibility report of the 
District Engineer, dated June 2000.

SEC. 329. POPLAR ISLAND, MARYLAND.

    (a) In General.--The project for beneficial use of dredged material 
at Poplar Island, Maryland, authorized by section 537 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3776), is modified to 
authorize the Secretary to provide the non-Federal interest credit 
toward cash contributions required--
            (1) before and during construction of the project, for the 
        costs of planning, engineering, and design and for construction 
        management work that is performed by the non-Federal interest 
        and that the Secretary determines is necessary to implement the 
        project; and
            (2) during construction of the project, for the costs of 
        the construction that the non-Federal interest carries out on 
        behalf of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
        necessary to carry out the project.
    (b) Reduction.--The private sector performance goals for 
engineering work of the Baltimore District of the Corps of Engineers 
shall be reduced by the amount of the credit under paragraph (1).

SEC. 330. NEW YORK HARBOR AND ADJACENT CHANNELS, PORT JERSEY, NEW 
              JERSEY.

    The project for navigation, New York Harbor and adjacent channels, 
Port Jersey, New Jersey, authorized by section 202(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4098) and modified by 
section 337 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
306-307), is further modified to authorize the Secretary to provide the 
non-Federal interests credit toward cash contributions required--
            (1) before, during, and after construction for planning, 
        engineering and design, and construction management work that 
        is performed by the non-Federal interests and that the 
        Secretary determines is necessary to implement the project; and
            (2) during and after construction for the costs of 
        construction that the non-Federal interests carry out on behalf 
        of the Secretary and that the Secretary determines is necessary 
        to implement the project.

SEC. 331. PASSAIC RIVER BASIN FLOOD MANAGEMENT, NEW JERSEY.

    (a) Reevaluation of Floodway Study.--The Secretary shall review the 
Passaic River Floodway Buyout Study, dated October 1995, conducted as 
part of the project for flood control, Passaic River Main Stem, New 
Jersey and New York, authorized by section 101(a)(18) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4607-4610), to calculate 
the benefits of a buyout and environmental restoration using the method 
used to calculate the benefits of structural projects under section 
308(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 
2318(b)).
    (b) Reevaluation of 10-Year Floodplain Study.--The Secretary shall 
review the Passaic River Buyout Study of the 10-year floodplain beyond 
the floodway of the Central Passaic River Basin, dated September 1995, 
conducted as part of the Passaic River Main Stem project to calculate 
the benefits of a buyout and environmental restoration using the method 
used to calculate the benefits of structural projects under section 
308(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 
2318(b)).
    (c) Preservation of Natural Storage Areas.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the 
        acquisition of wetlands in the Central Passaic River Basin for 
        flood protection purposes to supplement the wetland acquisition 
        authorized by section 101(a)(18)(C)(vi) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4609).
            (2) Purchase.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        acquisition of wetlands evaluated under paragraph (1) is cost-
        effective, the Secretary shall purchase the wetlands, with the 
        goal of purchasing not more than 8,200 acres.
    (d) Streambank Erosion Control Study.--The Secretary shall review 
relevant reports and conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration, erosion control, 
and streambank restoration along the Passaic River, from Dundee Dam to 
Kearny Point, New Jersey.
    (e) Passaic River Flood Management Task Force.--
            (1) Establishment.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the 
        non-Federal interest, shall establish a task force, to be known 
        as the ``Passaic River Flood Management Task Force'', to 
        provide advice to the Secretary concerning reevaluation of the 
        Passaic River Main Stem project.
            (2) Membership.--The task force shall be composed of 22 
        members, appointed as follows:
                    (A) Appointment by secretary.--The Secretary shall 
                appoint 1 member to represent the Corps of Engineers 
                and to provide technical advice to the task force.
                    (B) Appointments by governor of new jersey.--The 
                Governor of New Jersey shall appoint 20 members to the 
                task force, as follows:
                            (i) 2 representatives of the New Jersey 
                        legislature who are members of different 
                        political parties.
                            (ii) 3 representatives of the State of New 
                        Jersey.
                            (iii) 1 representative of each of Bergen, 
                        Essex, Morris, and Passaic Counties, New 
                        Jersey.
                            (iv) 6 representatives of governments of 
                        municipalities affected by flooding within the 
                        Passaic River Basin.
                            (v) 1 representative of the Palisades 
                        Interstate Park Commission.
                            (vi) 1 representative of the North Jersey 
                        District Water Supply Commission.
                            (vii) 1 representative of each of--
                                    (I) the Association of New Jersey 
                                Environmental Commissions;
                                    (II) the Passaic River Coalition; 
                                and
                                    (III) the Sierra Club.
                    (C) Appointment by governor of new york.--The 
                Governor of New York shall appoint 1 representative of 
                the State of New York to the task force.
            (3) Meetings.--
                    (A) Regular meetings.--The task force shall hold 
                regular meetings.
                    (B) Open meetings.--The meetings of the task force 
                shall be open to the public.
            (4) Annual report.--The task force shall submit annually to 
        the Secretary and to the non-Federal interest a report 
        describing the achievements of the Passaic River flood 
        management project in preventing flooding and any impediments 
        to completion of the project.
            (5) Expenditure of funds.--The Secretary may use funds made 
        available to carry out the Passaic River Basin flood management 
        project to pay the administrative expenses of the task force.
            (6) Termination.--The task force shall terminate on the 
        date on which the Passaic River flood management project is 
        completed.
    (f) Acquisition of Lands in the Floodway.--Section 1148 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4254; 110 Stat. 
3718-3719), is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) Consistency With New Jersey Blue Acres Program.--The 
Secretary shall carry out this section in a manner that is consistent 
with the Blue Acres Program of the State of New Jersey.''.
    (g) Study of Highlands Land Conservation.--The Secretary, in 
cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture and the State of New 
Jersey, may study the feasibility of conserving land in the Highlands 
region of New Jersey and New York to provide additional flood 
protection for residents of the Passaic River Basin in accordance with 
section 212 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 U.S.C. 
2332).
    (h) Restriction on Use of Funds.--The Secretary shall not obligate 
any funds to carry out design or construction of the tunnel element of 
the Passaic River Main Stem project.

SEC. 332. TIMES BEACH NATURE PRESERVE, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    The project for improving the quality of the environment, Times 
Beach Nature Preserve, Buffalo, New York, carried out under section 
1135 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a), 
is modified to include recreation as a project purpose.

SEC. 333. GARRISON DAM, NORTH DAKOTA.

    The Garrison Dam, North Dakota, feature of the project for flood 
control, Missouri River Basin, authorized by section 9(a) of the Flood 
Control Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 891), is modified to direct 
the Secretary to mitigate damage to the water transmission line for 
Williston, North Dakota, at Federal expense and a total cost of 
$3,900,000.

SEC. 334. DUCK CREEK, OHIO.

    The project for flood control, Duck Creek, Ohio, authorized by 
section 101(a)(24) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3665), is modified to authorize the Secretary carry out the 
project at a total cost of $36,323,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
of $27,242,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of $9,081,000.

SEC. 335. ASTORIA, OREGON.

    The project for navigation, Columbia River, Astoria, Oregon, 
authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An Act 
authorizing the construction, repair, and preservation of certain 
public works on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved 
July 24, 1946 (60 Stat. 637), is modified to provide that the Federal 
share of the cost of relocating causeway and mooring facilities located 
at the Astoria East Boat Basin shall be 100 percent but shall not 
exceed $500,000.

SEC. 336. NONCONNAH CREEK, TENNESSEE AND MISSISSIPPI.

    The project for flood control, Nonconnah Creek, Tennessee and 
Mississippi, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124), is modified to authorize the 
Secretary, if the Secretary determines that it is feasible--
            (1) to extend the area protected by the flood control 
        element of the project upstream approximately 5 miles to 
        Reynolds Road; and
            (2) to extend the hiking and biking trails of the 
        recreational element of the project from 8.8 to 27 miles.

SEC. 337. BOWIE COUNTY LEVEE, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, Red River below Denison Dam, Texas 
and Oklahoma, authorized by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 
(60 Stat. 647), is modified to direct the Secretary to implement the 
Bowie County levee feature of the project in accordance with the plan 
described as Alternative B in the draft document entitled ``Bowie 
County Local Flood Protection, Red River, Texas Project Design 
Memorandum No. 1, Bowie County Levee'', dated April 1997. In evaluating 
and implementing the modification, the Secretary shall allow the non-
Federal interest to participate in the financing of the project in 
accordance with section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act 
of 1986 (100 Stat. 4184) to the extent that the Secretary's evaluation 
of the modification indicates that applying such section is necessary 
to implement the modification.

SEC. 338. SAN ANTONIO CHANNEL, SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS.

    The project for flood control, San Antonio channel, Texas, 
authorized by section 203 of the Flood Control Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 
1259) as part of the comprehensive plan for flood protection on the 
Guadalupe and San Antonio Rivers in Texas, and modified by section 103 
of the Water Resources Development Act of 1976 (90 Stat. 2921), is 
further modified to include environmental restoration and recreation as 
project purposes.

SEC. 339. BUCHANAN AND DICKENSON COUNTIES, VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood control, Levisa and Tug Forks of the Big 
Sandy River and Upper Cumberland River, authorized by section 202 of 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1981 (94 Stat. 
1339), and modified by section 352 of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3724-3725), is further modified to direct the 
Secretary to determine the ability of Buchanan and Dickenson Counties, 
Virginia, to pay the non-Federal share of the cost of the project based 
solely on the criteria specified in section 103(m)(3)(A)(i) of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2213(m)(3)(A)(i)).

SEC. 340. BUCHANAN, DICKENSON, AND RUSSELL COUNTIES, VIRGINIA.

    At the request of the John Flannagan Water Authority, Dickenson 
County, Virginia, the Secretary may reallocate, under section 322 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4643-4644), 
water supply storage space in the John Flannagan Reservoir, Dickenson 
County, Virginia, sufficient to yield water withdrawals in amounts not 
to exceed 3,000,000 gallons per day in order to provide water for the 
communities in Buchanan, Dickenson, and Russell Counties, Virginia, 
notwithstanding the limitation in section 322(b) of such Act.

SEC. 341. SANDBRIDGE BEACH, VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA.

    The project for beach erosion control and hurricane protection, 
Sandbridge Beach, Virginia Beach, Virginia, authorized by section 
101(22) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 
4804), is modified to direct the Secretary to provide 50 years of 
periodic beach nourishment beginning on the date on which construction 
of the project was initiated in 1998.

SEC. 342. WALLOPS ISLAND, VIRGINIA.

    Section 567(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 367) is amended by striking ``$8,000,000'' and inserting 
``$20,000,000''.

SEC. 343. COLUMBIA RIVER, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The project for navigation, Columbia River, 
Washington, authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An 
Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and for 
other purposes'', approved June 13, 1902 (32 Stat. 369), is modified to 
direct the Secretary, in the operation and maintenance of the project, 
to mitigate damages to the shoreline of Puget Island, at a total cost 
of $1,000,000.
    (b) Allocation.--The cost of the mitigation shall be allocated as 
an operation and maintenance cost of the Federal navigation project.

SEC. 344. MOUNT ST. HELENS, WASHINGTON.

    The project for sediment control, Mount St. Helens, Washington, 
authorized by chapter IV of title I of the Supplemental Appropriations 
Act, 1985 (99 Stat. 318-319), is modified to authorize the Secretary to 
provide such cost-effective, environmentally acceptable measures as are 
necessary to maintain the flood protection levels for Longview, Kelso, 
Lexington, and Castle Rock on the Cowlitz River, Washington, identified 
in the October 1985 report of the Chief of Engineers entitled ``Mount 
St. Helens, Washington, Decision Document (Toutle, Cowlitz, and 
Columbia Rivers)'', printed as House Document number 99-135.

SEC. 345. RENTON, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Maximum Federal Expenditure.--The maximum amount of Federal 
funds that may be expended for the project for flood control, Renton, 
Washington, carried out under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 
1948, shall be $5,300,000.
    (b) Revision of Project Cooperation Agreement.--The Secretary shall 
revise the project cooperation agreement for the project described in 
subsection (a) to take into account the change in the Federal 
participation in the project in accordance with this section.
    (c) Reimbursement.--The Secretary may reimburse the non-Federal 
interest for the project described in subsection (a) for costs incurred 
to mitigate overdredging.

SEC. 346. GREENBRIER BASIN, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 579(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3790) is amended by striking ``$12,000,000'' and inserting 
``$73,000,000''.

SEC. 347. LOWER MUD RIVER, MILTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    The project for flood damage reduction, Lower Mud River, Milton, 
West Virginia, authorized by section 580 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3790), is modified to direct the 
Secretary to carry out the project.

SEC. 348. WATER QUALITY PROJECTS.

    Section 307(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4841) is amended by striking ``Jefferson and Orleans Parishes'' 
and inserting ``Jefferson, Orleans, and St. Tammany Parishes''.

SEC. 349. PROJECT REAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Each of the following projects may be carried out 
by the Secretary, and no construction on any such project may be 
initiated until the Secretary determines that the project is 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified, as appropriate:
            (1) Narraguagus river, milbridge, maine.--Only for the 
        purpose of maintenance as anchorage, those portions of the 
        project for navigation, Narraguagus River, Milbridge, Maine, 
        authorized by section 2 of the Act entitled ``An Act making 
        appropriations for the construction, repair, completion, and 
        preservation of certain works on rivers and harbors, and for 
        other purposes'', approved June 14, 1880 (21 Stat. 195), and 
        deauthorized under section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
        1962 (75 Stat. 1173), lying adjacent to and outside the limits 
        of the 11-foot and 9-foot channel authorized as part of the 
        project for navigation, authorized by such section 101, as 
        follows:
                    (A) An area located east of the 11-foot channel 
                starting at a point with coordinates N248,060.52, 
                E668,236.56, thence running south 36 degrees 20 minutes 
                52.3 seconds east 1567.242 feet to a point N246,798.21, 
                E669,165.44, thence running north 51 degrees 30 minutes 
                06.2 seconds west 839.855 feet to a point N247,321.01, 
                E668,508.15, thence running north 20 degrees 09 minutes 
                58.1 seconds west 787.801 feet to the point of origin.
                    (B) An area located west of the 9-foot channel 
                starting at a point with coordinates N249,673.29, 
                E667,537.73, thence running south 20 degrees 09 minutes 
                57.8 seconds east 1341.616 feet to a point N248,413.92, 
                E668,000.24, thence running south 01 degrees 04 minutes 
                26.8 seconds east 371.688 feet to a point N248,042.30, 
                E668,007.21, thence running north 22 degrees 21 minutes 
                20.8 seconds west 474.096 feet to a point N248,480.76, 
                E667,826.88, thence running north 79 degrees 09 minutes 
                31.6 seconds east 100.872 feet to a point N248,499.73, 
                E667,925.95, thence running north 13 degrees 47 minutes 
                27.6 seconds west 95.126 feet to a point N248,592.12, 
                E667,903.28, thence running south 79 degrees 09 minutes 
                31.6 seconds west 115.330 feet to a point N248,570.42, 
                E667,790.01, thence running north 22 degrees 21 minutes 
                20.8 seconds west 816.885 feet to a point N249,325.91, 
                E667,479.30, thence running north 07 degrees 03 minutes 
                00.3 seconds west 305.680 feet to a point N249,629.28, 
                E667,441.78, thence running north 65 degrees 21 minutes 
                33.8 seconds east 105.561 feet to the point of origin.
            (2) Cedar bayou, texas.--The project for navigation, Cedar 
        Bayou, Texas, authorized by the first section of the Act 
        entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the construction, 
        repair, and preservation of certain public works on rivers and 
        harbors, and for other purposes'', approved September 19, 1890 
        (26 Stat. 444), and modified by the first section of the Act 
        entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
        preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and 
        for other purposes'', approved July 3, 1930 (46 Stat. 926), and 
        deauthorized by section 1002 of the Water Resources Development 
        Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4219), except that the project is 
        authorized only for construction of a navigation channel 12 
        feet deep by 125 feet wide from mile -2.5 (at the junction with 
        the Houston Ship Channel) to mile 11.0 on Cedar Bayou.
    (b) Redesignation.--The following portion of the 11-foot channel of 
the project for navigation, Narraguagus River, Milbridge, Maine, 
referred to in subsection (a)(1) is redesignated as anchorage: starting 
at a point with coordinates N248,413.92, E668,000.24, thence running 
south 20 degrees 09 minutes 57.8 seconds east 1325.205 feet to a point 
N247,169.95, E668,457.09, thence running north 51 degrees 30 minutes 
05.7 seconds west 562.33 feet to a point N247,520.00, E668,017.00, 
thence running north 01 degrees 04 minutes 26.8 seconds west 894.077 
feet to the point of origin.

SEC. 350. CONTINUATION OF PROJECT AUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding section 1001(b)(2) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 579a(b)(2)), the following 
projects shall remain authorized to be carried out by the Secretary:
            (1) The projects for flood control, Sacramento River, 
        California, modified by section 10 of the Flood Control Act of 
        December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 900-901).
            (2) The project for flood protection, Sacramento River from 
        Chico Landing to Red Bluff, California, authorized by section 
        203 of the Flood Control Act of 1958 (72 Stat. 314).
    (b) Limitation.--A project described in subsection (a) shall not be 
authorized for construction after the last day of the 7-year period 
beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, unless, during such 
period, funds have been obligated for the construction (including 
planning and design) of the project.

SEC. 351. DECLARATION OF NONNAVIGABILITY FOR LAKE ERIE, NEW YORK.

    (a) Area To Be Declared Nonnavigable; Public Interest.--Unless the 
Secretary finds, after consultation with local and regional public 
officials (including local and regional public planning organizations), 
that the proposed projects to be undertaken within the boundaries in 
the portions of Erie County, New York, described in subsection (b), are 
not in the public interest then, subject to subsection (c), those 
portions of such county that were once part of Lake Erie and are now 
filled are declared to be nonnavigable waters of the United States.
    (b) Boundaries.--The portion of Erie County, New York, referred to 
in subsection (a) are all that tract or parcel of land, situate in the 
Town of Hamburg and the City of Lackawanna, County of Erie, State of 
New York, being part of Lots 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 
22, 23, 24, and 25 of the Ogden Gore Tract and part of Lots 23, 24, and 
36 of the Buffalo Creek Reservation, Township 10, Range 8 of the 
Holland Land Company's Survey and more particularly bounded and 
described as follows:
            Beginning at a point on the westerly highway boundary of 
        Hamburg Turnpike (66.0 feet wide), said point being 547.89 feet 
        South 19 deg.36'46'' East from the intersection of the westerly 
        highway boundary of Hamburg Turnpike (66.0 feet wide) and the 
        northerly line of the City of Lackawanna (also being the 
        southerly line of the City of Buffalo); thence South 
        19 deg.36'46'' East along the westerly highway boundary of 
        Hamburg Turnpike (66.0 feet wide) a distance of 628.41 feet; 
        thence along the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg Turnpike 
        as appropriated by the New York State Department of Public 
        Works as shown on Map No. 40-R2, Parcel No. 44 the following 20 
        courses and distances:
                    (1) South 10 deg.00'07'' East a distance of 164.30 
                feet;
                    (2) South 18 deg.40'45'' East a distance of 355.00 
                feet;
                    (3) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 2.00 
                feet;
                    (4) South 18 deg.40'45'' East a distance of 223.00 
                feet;
                    (5) South 22 deg.29'36'' East a distance of 150.35 
                feet;
                    (6) South 18 deg.40'45'' East a distance of 512.00 
                feet;
                    (7) South 16 deg.49'53'' East a distance of 260.12 
                feet;
                    (8) South 18 deg.34'20'' East a distance of 793.00 
                feet;
                    (9) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 4.00 
                feet;
                    (10) South 18 deg.13'24'' East a distance of 132.00 
                feet;
                    (11) North 71 deg.23'35'' East a distance of 4.67 
                feet;
                    (12) South 18 deg.30'00'' East a distance of 38.00 
                feet;
                    (13) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 4.86 
                feet;
                    (14) South 18 deg.13'24'' East a distance of 160.00 
                feet;
                    (15) South 71 deg.23'35'' East a distance of 9.80 
                feet;
                    (16) South 18 deg.36'25'' East a distance of 159.00 
                feet;
                    (17) South 71 deg.23'35'' West a distance of 3.89 
                feet;
                    (18) South 18 deg.34'20'' East a distance of 180.00 
                feet;
                    (19) South 20 deg.56'05'' East a distance of 138.11 
                feet;
                    (20) South 22 deg.53'55'' East a distance of 272.45 
                feet to a point on the westerly highway boundary of 
                Hamburg Turnpike.
        Thence southerly along the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg 
        Turnpike, South 18 deg.36'25'' East, a distance of 2228.31 
        feet; thence along the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg 
        Turnpike as appropriated by the New York State Department of 
        Public Works as shown on Map No. 27 Parcel No. 31 the following 
        2 courses and distances:
                    (1) South 16 deg.17'25'' East a distance of 74.93 
                feet;
                    (2) along a curve to the right having a radius of 
                1004.74 feet; a chord distance of 228.48 feet along a 
                chord bearing of South 08 deg.12'16'' East, a distance 
                of 228.97 feet to a point on the westerly highway 
                boundary of Hamburg Turnpike.
        Thence southerly along the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg 
        Turnpike, South 4 deg.35'35'' West a distance of 940.87 feet; 
        thence along the westerly highway boundary of Hamburg Turnpike 
        as appropriated by the New York State Department of Public 
        Works as shown on Map No. 1 Parcel No. 1 and Map No. 5 Parcel 
        No. 7 the following 18 courses and distances:
                    (1) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 1.00 
                feet;
                    (2) South 7 deg.01'17'' West a distance of 170.15 
                feet;
                    (3) South 5 deg.02'54'' West a distance of 180.00 
                feet;
                    (4) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 3.00 
                feet;
                    (5) South 5 deg.02'54'' West a distance of 260.00 
                feet;
                    (6) South 5 deg.09'11'' West a distance of 110.00 
                feet;
                    (7) South 0 deg.34'35'' West a distance of 110.27 
                feet;
                    (8) South 4 deg.50'37'' West a distance of 220.00 
                feet;
                    (9) South 4 deg.50'37'' West a distance of 365.00 
                feet;
                    (10) South 85 deg.24'25'' East a distance of 5.00 
                feet;
                    (11) South 4 deg.06'20'' West a distance of 67.00 
                feet;
                    (12) South 6 deg.04'35'' West a distance of 248.08 
                feet;
                    (13) South 3 deg.18'27'' West a distance of 52.01 
                feet;
                    (14) South 4 deg.55'58'' West a distance of 133.00 
                feet;
                    (15) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 1.00 
                feet;
                    (16) South 4 deg.55'58'' West a distance of 45.00 
                feet;
                    (17) North 85 deg.24'25'' West a distance of 7.00 
                feet;
                    (18) South 4 deg.56'12'' West a distance of 90.00 
                feet.
        Thence continuing along the westerly highway boundary of Lake 
        Shore Road as appropriated by the New York State Department of 
        Public Works as shown on Map No. 7, Parcel No. 7 the following 
        2 courses and distances:
                    (1) South 4 deg.55'58'' West a distance of 127.00 
                feet;
                    (2) South 2 deg.29'25'' East a distance of 151.15 
                feet to a point on the westerly former highway boundary 
                of Lake Shore Road.
        Thence southerly along the westerly formerly highway boundary 
        of Lake Shore Road, South 4 deg.35'35'' West a distance of 
        148.90 feet; thence along the westerly highway boundary of Lake 
        Shore Road as appropriated by the New York State Department of 
        Public Works as shown on Map No. 7, Parcel No. 8 the following 
        3 courses and distances:
                    (1) South 55 deg.34'35'' West a distance of 12.55 
                feet;
                    (2) South 4 deg.35'35'' West a distance of 118.50 
                feet;
                    (3) South 3 deg.04'00'' West a distance of 62.95 
                feet to a point on the south line of the lands of South 
                Buffalo Railway Company.
        Thence southerly and easterly along the lands of South Buffalo 
        Railway Company the following 5 courses and distances:
                    (1) North 89 deg.25'14'' West a distance of 697.64 
                feet;
                    (2) along a curve to the left having a radius of 
                645.0 feet; a chord distance of 214.38 feet along a 
                chord bearing of South 40 deg.16'48'' West, a distance 
                of 215.38 feet;
                    (3) South 30 deg.42'49'' West a distance of 76.96 
                feet;
                    (4) South 22 deg.06'03'' West a distance of 689.43 
                feet;
                    (5) South 36 deg.09'23'' West a distance of 30.93 
                feet to the northerly line of the lands of Buffalo 
                Crushed Stone, Inc.
        Thence North 87 deg.13'38'' West a distance of 2452.08 feet to 
        the shore line of Lake Erie; thence northerly along the shore 
        of Lake Erie the following 43 courses and distances:
                    (1) North 16 deg.29'53'' West a distance of 267.84 
                feet;
                    (2) North 24 deg.25'00'' West a distance of 195.01 
                feet;
                    (3) North 26 deg.45'00'' West a distance of 250.00 
                feet;
                    (4) North 31 deg.15'00'' West a distance of 205.00 
                feet;
                    (5) North 21 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 110.00 
                feet;
                    (6) North 44 deg.00'53'' West a distance of 26.38 
                feet;
                    (7) North 33 deg.49'18'' West a distance of 74.86 
                feet;
                    (8) North 34 deg.26'26'' West a distance of 12.00 
                feet;
                    (9) North 31 deg.06'16'' West a distance of 72.06 
                feet;
                    (10) North 22 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 150.00 
                feet;
                    (11) North 16 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 420.00 
                feet;
                    (12) North 21 deg.l0'00'' West a distance of 440.00 
                feet;
                    (13) North 17 deg.55'00'' West a distance of 340.00 
                feet;
                    (14) North 28 deg.05'00'' West a distance of 375.00 
                feet;
                    (15) North 16 deg.25'00'' West a distance of 585.00 
                feet;
                    (16) North 22 deg.10'00'' West a distance of 160.00 
                feet;
                    (17) North 2 deg.46'36'' West a distance of 65.54 
                feet;
                    (18) North 16 deg.01'08'' West a distance of 70.04 
                feet;
                    (19) North 49 deg.07'00'' West a distance of 79.00 
                feet;
                    (20) North 19 deg.16'00'' West a distance of 425.00 
                feet;
                    (21) North 16 deg.37'00'' West a distance of 285.00 
                feet;
                    (22) North 25 deg.20'00'' West a distance of 360.00 
                feet;
                    (23) North 33 deg.00'00'' West a distance of 230.00 
                feet;
                    (24) North 32 deg.40'00'' West a distance of 310.00 
                feet;
                    (25) North 27 deg.10'00'' West a distance of 130.00 
                feet;
                    (26) North 23 deg.20'00'' West a distance of 315.00 
                feet;
                    (27) North 18 deg.20'04'' West a distance of 302.92 
                feet;
                    (28) North 20 deg.15'48'' West a distance of 387.18 
                feet;
                    (29) North 14 deg.20'00'' West a distance of 530.00 
                feet;
                    (30) North 16 deg.40'00'' West a distance of 260.00 
                feet;
                    (31) North 28 deg.35'00'' West a distance of 195.00 
                feet;
                    (32) North 18 deg.30'00'' West a distance of 170.00 
                feet;
                    (33) North 26 deg.30'00'' West a distance of 340.00 
                feet;
                    (34) North 32 deg.07'52'' West a distance of 232.38 
                feet;
                    (35) North 30 deg.04'26'' West a distance of 17.96 
                feet;
                    (36) North 23 deg.19'13'' West a distance of 111.23 
                feet;
                    (37) North 7 deg.07'58'' West a distance of 63.90 
                feet;
                    (38) North 8 deg.11'02'' West a distance of 378.90 
                feet;
                    (39) North 15 deg.01'02'' West a distance of 190.64 
                feet;
                    (40) North 2 deg.55'00'' West a distance of 170.00 
                feet;
                    (41) North 6 deg.45'00'' West a distance of 240.00 
                feet;
                    (42) North 0 deg.10'00'' East a distance of 465.00 
                feet;
                    (43) North 2 deg.00'38'' West a distance of 378.58 
                feet to the northerly line of Letters Patent dated 
                February 21, 1968 and recorded in the Erie County 
                Clerk's Office under Liber 7453 of Deeds at Page 45.
        Thence North 71 deg.23'35'' East along the north line of the 
        aforementioned Letters Patent a distance of 154.95 feet to the 
        shore line; thence along the shore line the following 6 courses 
        and distances:
                    (1) South 80 deg.14'01'' East a distance of 119.30 
                feet;
                    (2) North 46 deg.15'13'' East a distance of 47.83 
                feet;
                    (3) North 59 deg.53'02'' East a distance of 53.32 
                feet;
                    (4) North 38 deg.20'43'' East a distance of 27.31 
                feet;
                    (5) North 68 deg.12'46'' East a distance of 48.67 
                feet;
                    (6) North 26 deg.11'47'' East a distance of 11.48 
                feet to the northerly line of the aforementioned 
                Letters Patent.
        Thence along the northerly line of said Letters Patent, North 
        71 deg.23'35'' East a distance of 1755.19 feet; thence South 
        35 deg.27'25'' East a distance of 35.83 feet to a point on the 
        U.S. Harbor Line; thence, North 54 deg.02'35'' East along the 
        U.S. Harbor Line a distance of 200.00 feet; thence continuing 
        along the U.S. Harbor Line, North 50 deg.01'45'' East a 
        distance of 379.54 feet to the westerly line of the lands of 
        Gateway Trade Center, Inc.; thence along the lands of Gateway 
        Trade Center, Inc. the following 27 courses and distances:
                    (1) South 18 deg.44'53'' East a distance of 623.56 
                feet;
                    (2) South 34 deg.33'00'' East a distance of 200.00 
                feet;
                    (3) South 26 deg.18'55'' East a distance of 500.00 
                feet;
                    (4) South 19 deg.06'40'' East a distance of 1074.29 
                feet;
                    (5) South 28 deg.03'18'' East a distance of 242.44 
                feet;
                    (6) South 18 deg.38'50'' East a distance of 1010.95 
                feet;
                    (7) North 71 deg.20'51'' East a distance of 90.42 
                feet;
                    (8) South 18 deg.49'20'' East a distance of 158.61 
                feet;
                    (9) South 80 deg.55'10'' East a distance of 45.14 
                feet;
                    (10) South 18 deg.04'45'' East a distance of 52.13 
                feet;
                    (11) North 71 deg.07'23'' East a distance of 102.59 
                feet;
                    (12) South 18 deg.41'40'' East a distance of 63.00 
                feet;
                    (13) South 71 deg.07'23'' West a distance of 240.62 
                feet;
                    (14) South 18 deg.38'50'' East a distance of 668.13 
                feet;
                    (15) North 71 deg.28'46'' East a distance of 958.68 
                feet;
                    (16) North 18 deg.42'31'' West a distance of 
                1001.28 feet;
                    (17) South 71 deg.17'29'' West a distance of 168.48 
                feet;
                    (18) North 18 deg.42'31'' West a distance of 642.00 
                feet;
                    (19) North 71 deg.17'37'' East a distance of 17.30 
                feet;
                    (20) North 18 deg.42'31'' West a distance of 574.67 
                feet;
                    (21) North 71 deg.17'29'' East a distance of 151.18 
                feet;
                    (22) North 18 deg.42'31''West a distance of 1156.43 
                feet;
                    (23) North 71 deg.29'21'' East a distance of 569.24 
                feet;
                    (24) North 18 deg.30'39'' West a distance of 314.71 
                feet;
                    (25) North 70 deg.59'36'' East a distance of 386.47 
                feet;
                    (26) North 18 deg.30'39'' West a distance of 70.00 
                feet;
                    (27) North 70 deg.59'36'' East a distance of 400.00 
                feet to the place or point of beginning.
        Containing 1,142.958 acres.
    (c) Limits on Applicability; Regulatory Requirements.--The 
declaration under subsection (a) shall apply to those parts of the 
areas described in subsection (b) which are filled portions of Lake 
Erie. Any work on these filled portions is subject to all applicable 
Federal statutes and regulations, including sections 9 and 10 of the 
Act of March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1151; 33 U.S.C. 401 and 403), commonly 
known as the River and Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899, section 404 
of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1344), and the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969.
    (d) Expiration Date.--If, 20 years from the date of enactment of 
this Act, any area or part thereof described in subsection (a) of this 
section is not occupied by permanent structures in accordance with the 
requirements set out in subsection (c) of this section, or if work in 
connection with any activity permitted in subsection (c) is not 
commenced within 5 years after issuance of such permits, then the 
declaration of nonnavigability for such area or part thereof shall 
expire.

SEC. 352. PROJECT DEAUTHORIZATIONS.

    (a) In General.--The following projects or portions of projects are 
not authorized after the date of enactment of this Act:
            (1) Black warrior and tombigbee rivers, jackson, alabama.--
        The project for navigation, Black Warrior and Tombigbee Rivers, 
        vicinity of Jackson, Alabama, authorized by section 106 of the 
        Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 1987 (100 
        Stat. 3341-199).
            (2) Sacramento deep water ship channel, california.--The 
        portion of the project for navigation, Sacramento Deep Water 
        Ship Channel, California, authorized by section 202(a) of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4092), 
        beginning from the confluence of the Sacramento River and the 
        Barge Canal to a point 3,300 feet west of the William G. Stone 
        Lock western gate (including the William G. Stone Lock and the 
        Bascule Bridge and Barge Canal). All waters within such portion 
        of the project are declared to be nonnavigable waters of the 
        United States solely for purposes of the General Bridge Act of 
        1946 (33 U.S.C. 525 et seq.) and section 9 of the Act of March 
        3, 1899 (33 U.S.C. 401), commonly known as the Rivers and 
        Harbors Appropriation Act of 1899.
            (3) Bay island channel, quincy, illinois.--The access 
        channel across Bay Island into Quincy Bay at Quincy, Illinois, 
        constructed under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
        1960 (33 U.S.C. 577).
            (4) Warsaw boat harbor, illinois.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Illinois Waterway, Illinois and 
        Indiana, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act 
        of 1962 (76 Stat. 1175), known as the Warsaw Boat Harbor, 
        Illinois.
            (5) Rockport harbor, rockport, massachusetts.--The 
        following portions of the project for navigation, Rockport 
        Harbor, Massachusetts, carried out under section 107 of the 
        River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577):
                    (A) The portion of the 10-foot harbor channel the 
                boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates 
                N605,741.948, E838,031.378, thence running north 36 
                degrees 04 minutes 40.9 seconds east 123.386 feet to a 
                point N605,642.226, E838,104.039, thence running south 
                05 degrees 08 minutes 35.1 seconds east 24.223 feet to 
                a point N605,618.100, E838,106.210, thence running 
                north 41 degrees 05 minutes 10.9 seconds west 141.830 
                feet to a point N605,725.000, E838,013.000, thence 
                running north 47 degrees 19 minutes 04.1 seconds east 
                25.000 feet to the point of origin.
                    (B) The portion of the 8-foot north basin entrance 
                channel the boundaries of which begin at a point with 
                coordinates N605,742.699, E837,977.129, thence running 
                south 89 degrees 12 minutes 27.1 seconds east 54.255 
                feet to a point N605,741.948, E838,031.378, thence 
                running south 47 degrees 19 minutes 04.1 seconds west 
                25.000 feet to a point N605,725.000, E838,013.000, 
                thence running north 63 degrees 44 minutes 19.0 seconds 
                west 40.000 feet to the point of origin.
                    (C) The portion of the 8-foot south basin anchorage 
                the boundaries of which begin at a point with 
                coordinates N605,563.770, E838,111.100, thence running 
                south 05 degrees 08 minutes 35.1 seconds east 53.460 
                feet to a point N605,510.525, E838,115.892, thence 
                running south 52 degrees 10 minutes 55.5 seconds west 
                145.000 feet to a point N605,421.618, E838,001.348, 
                thence running north 37 degrees 49 minutes 04.5 seconds 
                west feet to a point N605,480.960, E837,955.287, thence 
                running south 64 degrees 52 minutes 33.9 seconds east 
                33.823 feet to a point N605,466.600, E837,985.910, 
                thence running north 52 degrees 10 minutes 55.5 seconds 
                east 158.476 feet to the point of origin.
            (6) Scituate harbor, massachusetts.--The portion of the 
        project for navigation, Scituate Harbor, Massachusetts, 
        authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1954 
        (68 Stat. 1249), consisting of an 8-foot anchorage basin and 
        described as follows: Beginning at a point with coordinates 
        N438,739.53, E810,354.75, thence running northwesterly about 
        200.00 feet to coordinates N438,874.02, E810,206.72, thence 
        running northeasterly about 400.00 feet to coordinates 
        N439,170.07, E810,475,70, thence running southwesterly about 
        447.21 feet to the point of origin.
            (7) Duluth-superior harbor, minnesota and wisconsin.--The 
        portion of the project for navigation, Duluth-Superior Harbor, 
        Minnesota and Wisconsin, authorized by the first section of the 
        Act entitled ``An Act making appropriations for the 
        construction, repair, and preservation of certain public works 
        on rivers and harbors, and for other purposes'', approved June 
        3, 1896 (29 Stat. 212), known as the 21st Avenue West Channel, 
        beginning at the most southeasterly point of the channel 
        N423074.09, E2871635.43 thence running north-northwest about 
        1854.83 feet along the easterly limit of the project to a point 
        N424706.69, E2870755.48, thence running northwesterly about 
        111.07 feet to a point on the northerly limit of the project 
        N424777.27, E2870669.46, thence west-southwest 157.88 feet 
        along the north limit of the project to a point N424703.04, 
        E2870530.38, thence south-southeast 1978.27 feet to the most 
        southwesterly point N422961.45, E2871469.07, thence 
        northeasterly 201.00 feet along the southern limit of the 
        project to the point of origin.
            (8) Tremley point, new jersey.--The portion of the Federal 
        navigation channel, New York and New Jersey Channels, New York 
        and New Jersey, authorized by the first section of the Act 
        entitled ``An Act authorizing the construction, repair, and 
        preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and 
        for other purposes'', approved August 30, 1935 (49 Stat. 1028), 
        and modified by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1950 
        (64 Stat. 164), that consists of a 35-foot deep channel 
        beginning at a point along the western limit of the authorized 
        project, N644100.411, E129256.91, thence running southeasterly 
        about 38.25 feet to a point N644068.885, E129278.565, thence 
        running southerly about 1,163.86 feet to a point N642912.127, 
        E129150.209, thence running southwesterly about 56.89 feet to a 
        point N642864.09, E2129119.725, thence running northerly along 
        the existing western limit of the existing project to the point 
        of origin.
            (9) Angola, new york.--The project for erosion protection, 
        Angola Water Treatment Plant, Angola, New York, constructed 
        under section 14 of the Flood Control Act of 1946 (33 U.S.C. 
        701r).
            (10) Wallabout channel, brooklyn, new york.--The portion of 
        the project for navigation, Wallabout Channel, Brooklyn, New 
        York, authorized by the first section of the Act entitled ``An 
        Act making appropriations for the construction, repair, and 
        preservation of certain public works on rivers and harbors, and 
        for other purposes'', approved March 3, 1899 (30 Stat. 1124), 
        that is located at the northeast corner of the project and is 
        described as follows:
                    Beginning at a point forming the northeast corner 
                of the project and designated with the coordinate of 
                North N 682,307.40; East 638,918.10; thence along the 
                following 6 courses and distances:
                            (A) South 85 degrees, 44 minutes, 13 
                        seconds East 87.94 feet (coordinate: N 
                        682,300.86 E 639,005.80).
                            (B) North 74 degrees, 41 minutes, 30 
                        seconds East 271.54 feet (coordinate: N 
                        682,372.55 E 639,267.71).
                            (C) South 4 degrees, 46 minutes, 02 seconds 
                        West 170.95 feet (coordinate: N 682,202.20 E 
                        639,253.50).
                            (D) South 4 degrees, 46 minutes, 02 seconds 
                        West 239.97 feet (coordinate: N 681,963.06 E 
                        639,233.56).
                            (E) North 50 degrees, 48 minutes, 26 
                        seconds West 305.48 feet (coordinate: N 
                        682,156.10 E 638,996.80).
                            (F) North 3 degrees, 33 minutes, 25 seconds 
                        East 145.04 feet (coordinate: N 682,300.86 E 
                        639,005.80).
    (b) Rockport Harbor, Massachusetts.--The project for navigation, 
Rockport Harbor, Massachusetts, carried out under section 107 of the 
River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), is modified--
            (1) to redesignate a portion of the 8-foot north outer 
        anchorage as part of the 8-foot approach channel to the north 
        inner basin described as follows: the perimeter of the area 
        starts at a point with coordinates N605,792.110, E838,020.009, 
        thence running south 89 degrees 12 minutes 27.1 seconds east 
        64.794 feet to a point N605,791.214, E838,084.797, thence 
        running south 47 degrees 18 minutes 54.0 seconds west 40.495 
        feet to a point N605,763.760, E838,055.030, thence running 
        north 68 degrees 26 minutes 49.0 seconds west 43.533 feet to a 
        point N605,779.750, E838,014.540, thence running north 23 
        degrees 52 minutes 08.4 seconds east 13.514 feet to the point 
        of origin; and
            (2) to realign a portion of the 8-foot north inner basin 
        approach channel by adding an area described as follows: the 
        perimeter of the area starts at a point with coordinates 
        N605,792.637, E837,981.920, thence running south 89 degrees 12 
        minutes 27.1 seconds east 38.093 feet to a point N605,792.110, 
        E838,020.009, thence running south 23 degrees 52 minutes 08.4 
        seconds west 13.514 feet to a point N605,779.752, E838,014.541, 
        thence running north 68 degrees 26 minutes 49.0 seconds west 
        35.074 feet to the point of origin.

SEC. 353. WYOMING VALLEY, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The project for flood control, Wyoming Valley, 
Pennsylvania, authorized by section 401(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4124) is modified as provided in 
this section.
    (b) Additional Project Elements.--The Secretary shall construct 
each of the following additional elements of the project to the extent 
that the Secretary determines that the element is technically feasible, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified:
            (1) The River Commons plan developed by the non-Federal 
        sponsor for both sides of the Susquehanna River beside historic 
        downtown Wilkes-Barre.
            (2) Necessary portal modifications to the project to allow 
        at grade access from Wilkes-Barre to the Susquehanna River to 
        facilitate operation, maintenance, replacement, repair, and 
        rehabilitation of the project and to restore access to the 
        Susquehanna River for the public.
            (3) A concrete capped sheet pile wall in lieu of raising an 
        earthen embankment to reduce the disturbance to the Historic 
        River Commons area.
            (4) All necessary modifications to the Stormwater Pump 
        Stations in Wyoming Valley.
            (5) All necessary evaluations and modifications to all 
        elements of the existing flood control projects to include Coal 
        Creek, Toby Creek, Abrahams Creek, and various relief culverts 
        and penetrations through the levee.
    (c) Credit.--The Secretary shall credit the Luzerne County Flood 
Protection Authority toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
project for the value of the Forty-Fort ponding basin area purchased 
after June 1, 1972, by Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, for an estimated 
cost of $500,000 under section 102(w) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (102 Stat. 508) to the extent that the 
Secretary determines that the area purchased is integral to the 
project.
    (d) Modification of Mitigation Plan and Project Cooperation 
Agreement.--
            (1) Modification of mitigation plan.--The Secretary shall 
        provide for the deletion, from the Mitigation Plan for the 
        Wyoming Valley Levees, approved by the Secretary on February 
        15, 1996, the proposal to remove the abandoned Bloomsburg 
        Railroad Bridge.
            (2) Modification of project cooperation agreement.--The 
        Secretary shall modify the project cooperation agreement, 
        executed in October 1996, to reflect removal of the railroad 
        bridge and its $1,800,000 total cost from the mitigation plan 
        under paragraph (1).
    (e) Maximum Project Cost.--The total cost of the project, as 
modified by this section, shall not exceed the amount authorized in 
section 401(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4124), with increases authorized by section 902 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 Stat. 4183).

SEC. 354. REHOBOTH BEACH AND DEWEY BEACH, DELAWARE.

    The project for storm damage reduction and shoreline protection, 
Rehoboth Beach and Dewey Beach, Delaware, authorized by section 
101(b)(6) of the Water Resources development Act of 1996, is modified 
to authorize the project at a total cost of $13,997,000, with an 
estimated Federal cost of $9,098,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
of $4,899,000, and an estimated average annual cost of $1,320,000 for 
periodic nourishment over the 50-year life of the project, with an 
estimated annual Federal cost of $858,000 and an estimated annual non-
Federal cost of $462,000.

                           TITLE IV--STUDIES

SEC. 401. STUDIES OF COMPLETED PROJECTS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study under section 216 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1830) of each of the following completed 
projects:
            (1) Escambia bay and river, florida.--Project for 
        navigation, Escambia Bay and River, Florida.
            (2) Illinois river, havana, illinois.--Project for flood 
        control, Illinois River, Havana, Illinois, authorized by 
        section 5 of the Flood Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 
        1583).
            (3) Spring lake, illinois.--Project for flood control, 
        Spring Lake, Illinois, authorized by section 5 of the Flood 
        Control Act of June 22, 1936 (49 Stat. 1584).
            (4) Port orford, oregon.--Project for flood control, Port 
        Orford, Oregon, authorized by section 301 of River and Harbor 
        Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 1092).

SEC. 402. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

    Section 729 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4164) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 729. WATERSHED AND RIVER BASIN ASSESSMENTS.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary may assess the water resources 
needs of interstate river basins and watersheds of the United States. 
The assessments shall be undertaken in cooperation and coordination 
with the Departments of the Interior, Agriculture, and Commerce, the 
Environmental Protection Agency, and other appropriate agencies, and 
may include an evaluation of ecosystem protection and restoration, 
flood damage reduction, navigation and port needs, watershed 
protection, water supply, and drought preparedness.
    ``(b) Consultation.--The Secretary shall consult with Federal, 
tribal, State, interstate, and local governmental entities in carrying 
out the assessments authorized by this section. In conducting the 
assessments, the Secretary may accept contributions of services, 
materials, supplies and cash from Federal, tribal, State, interstate, 
and local governmental entities where the Secretary determines that 
such contributions will facilitate completion of the assessments.
    ``(c) Priority Consideration.--The Secretary shall give priority 
consideration to the following interstate river basins and watersheds:
            ``(1) Delaware River.
            ``(2) Potomac River.
            ``(3) Susquehanna River.
            ``(4) Kentucky River.
    ``(d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $15,000,000.''.

SEC. 403. LOWER MISSISSIPPI RIVER RESOURCE ASSESSMENT.

    (a) Assessments.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary 
of the Interior and the States of Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, 
Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee, shall undertake, at 
Federal expense, for the Lower Mississippi River system--
            (1) an assessment of information needed for river-related 
        management;
            (2) an assessment of natural resource habitat needs; and
            (3) an assessment of the need for river-related recreation 
        and access.
    (b) Period.--Each assessment referred to in subsection (a) shall be 
carried out for 2 years.
    (c) Reports.--Before the last day of the second year of an 
assessment under subsection (a), the Secretary, in cooperation with the 
Secretary of the Interior and the States of Arkansas, Illinois, 
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee, shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the assessment to 
Congress. The report shall contain recommendations for--
            (1) the collection, availability, and use of information 
        needed for river-related management;
            (2) the planning, construction, and evaluation of potential 
        restoration, protection, and enhancement measures to meet 
        identified habitat needs; and
            (3) potential projects to meet identified river access and 
        recreation needs.
    (d) Lower Mississippi River System Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``Lower Mississippi River system'' means those river reaches and 
adjacent floodplains within the Lower Mississippi River alluvial valley 
having commercial navigation channels on the Mississippi mainstem and 
tributaries south of Cairo, Illinois, and the Atchafalaya basin 
floodway system.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $1,750,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 404. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER BASIN SEDIMENT AND NUTRIENT STUDY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct, at Federal expense, a 
study--
            (1) to identify significant sources of sediment and 
        nutrients in the Upper Mississippi River basin; and
            (2) to describe and evaluate the processes by which the 
        sediments and nutrients move, on land and in water, from their 
        sources to the Upper Mississippi River and its tributaries.
    (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
consult the Departments of Agriculture and the Interior.
    (c) Components of the Study.--
            (1) Computer modeling.--As part of the study, the Secretary 
        shall develop computer models at the subwatershed and basin 
        level to identify and quantify the sources of sediment and 
        nutrients and to examine the effectiveness of alternative 
        management measures.
            (2) Research.--As part of the study, the Secretary shall 
        conduct research to improve understanding of--
                    (A) the processes affecting sediment and nutrient 
                (with emphasis on nitrogen and phosphorus) movement;
                    (B) the influences of soil type, slope, climate, 
                vegetation cover, and modifications to the stream 
                drainage network on sediment and nutrient losses; and
                    (C) river hydrodynamics in relation to sediment and 
                nutrient transformations, retention, and movement.
    (d) Use of Information.--Upon request of a Federal agency, the 
Secretary may provide information to the agency for use in sediment and 
nutrient reduction programs associated with land use and land 
management practices.
    (e) Report to Congress.--Not later than 3 years after the date of 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit /to Congress a 
report on the results of the study, including findings and 
recommendations.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 405. UPPER MISSISSIPPI RIVER COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

    Section 459(e) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 333) is amended by striking ``date of enactment of this Act'' and 
inserting ``first date on which funds are appropriated to carry out 
this section.''.

SEC. 406. OHIO RIVER SYSTEM.

    The Secretary may conduct a study of commodity flows on the Ohio 
River system at Federal expense. The study shall include an analysis of 
the commodities transported on the Ohio River system, including 
information on the origins and destinations of these commodities and 
market trends, both national and international.

SEC. 407. EASTERN ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall reevaluate the recommendations 
in the Eastern Arkansas Region Comprehensive Study of the Memphis 
District Engineer, dated August 1990, to determine whether the plans 
outlined in the study for agricultural water supply from the Little Red 
River, Arkansas, are feasible and in the Federal interest.
    (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the reevaluation.

SEC. 408. RUSSELL, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the preliminary 
investigation report for agricultural water supply, Russell, Arkansas, 
entitled ``Preliminary Investigation: Lone Star Management Project'', 
prepared for the Lone Star Water Irrigation District, to determine 
whether the plans contained in the report are feasible and in the 
Federal interest.
    (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the evaluation.

SEC. 409. ESTUDILLO CANAL, SAN LEANDRO, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction along the Estudillo 
Canal, San Leandro, California.

SEC. 410. LAGUNA CREEK, FREMONT, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction in the Laguna Creek 
watershed, Fremont, California.

SEC. 411. LAKE MERRITT, OAKLAND, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for ecosystem restoration, flood damage 
reduction, and recreation at Lake Merritt, Oakland, California.

SEC. 412. LANCASTER, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the report of the 
city of Lancaster, California, entitled ``Master Plan of Drainage'', to 
determine whether the plans contained in the report are feasible and in 
the Federal interest, including plans relating to drainage corridors 
located at 52nd Street West, 35th Street West, North Armargosa, and 
20th Street East.
    (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the evaluation.

SEC. 413. NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
feasibility of carrying out a project to address water supply, water 
quality, and groundwater problems at Miliken, Sarco, and Tulocay Creeks 
in Napa County, California.
    (b) Use of Existing Data.--In conducting the study, the Secretary 
shall use data and information developed by the United States 
Geological Survey in the report entitled ``Geohydrologic Framework and 
Hydrologic Budget of the Lower Miliken-Sarco-Tulocay Creeks Area of 
Napa, California''.

SEC. 414. OCEANSIDE, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study, at Federal expense, to 
determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for shoreline 
protection at Oceanside, California. In conducting the study, the 
Secretary shall determine the portion of beach erosion that is the 
result of a Navy navigation project at Camp Pendleton Harbor, 
California.

SEC. 415. SUISUN MARSH, CALIFORNIA.

    The investigation for Suisun Marsh, California, authorized under 
the Energy and Water Development Appropriations Act, 2000 (Public Law 
106-60), shall be limited to evaluating the feasibility of the levee 
enhancement and managed wetlands protection program for Suisun Marsh, 
California.

SEC. 416. LAKE ALLATOONA WATERSHED, GEORGIA.

    Section 413 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 324) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 413. LAKE ALLATOONA WATERSHED, GEORGIA.

    ``(a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a comprehensive 
study of the Lake Allatoona watershed, Georgia, to determine the 
feasibility of undertaking ecosystem restoration and resource 
protection measures.
    ``(b) Matters To Be Addressed.--The study shall address streambank 
and shoreline erosion, sedimentation, water quality, fish and wildlife 
habitat degradation and other problems relating to ecosystem 
restoration and resource protection in the Lake Allatoona watershed.''.

SEC. 417. CHICAGO RIVER, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for shoreline protection 
along the Chicago River, Chicago, Illinois.
    (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study, the Secretary shall 
consult, and incorporate information available from, appropriate 
Federal, State, and local government agencies.

SEC. 418. CHICAGO SANITARY AND SHIP CANAL SYSTEM, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the advisability 
of reducing the use of the waters of Lake Michigan to support 
navigation in the Chicago sanitary and ship canal system, Chicago, 
Illinois.

SEC. 419. LONG LAKE, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for environmental restoration and protection, 
Long Lake, Indiana.

SEC. 420. BRUSH AND ROCK CREEKS, MISSION HILLS AND FAIRWAY, KANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the preliminary 
engineering report for the project for flood control, Mission Hills and 
Fairway, Kansas, entitled ``Preliminary Engineering Report: Brush 
Creek/Rock Creek Drainage Improvements, 66th Street to State Line 
Road'', to determine whether the plans contained in the report are 
feasible and in the Federal interest.
    (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the evaluation.

SEC. 421. COASTAL AREAS OF LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
developing measures to floodproof major hurricane evacuation routes in 
the coastal areas of Louisiana.

SEC. 422. IBERIA PORT, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for navigation, Iberia Port, Louisiana.

SEC. 423. LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN SEAWALL, LOUISIANA.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall complete a post-authorization change report on the 
project for hurricane-flood protection, Lake Pontchartrain, Louisiana, 
authorized by section 204 of the Flood Control Act of 1965 (79 Stat. 
1077), to incorporate and accomplish structural modifications to the 
seawall providing protection along the south shore of Lake 
Pontchartrain from the New Basin Canal on the west to the Inner Harbor 
Navigation Canal on the east.

SEC. 424. LOWER ATCHAFALAYA BASIN, LOUISIANA.

    As part of the Lower Atchafalaya basin reevaluation study, the 
Secretary shall determine the feasibility of carrying out a project for 
flood damage reduction, Stephensville, Louisiana.

SEC. 425. ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH, LOUISIANA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for flood damage reduction on the east bank of 
the Mississippi River in St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana.

SEC. 426. LAS VEGAS VALLEY, NEVADA.

    Section 432(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 327) is amended by inserting ``recreation,'' after ``runoff),''.

SEC. 427. SOUTHWEST VALLEY, ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO.

    Section 433 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 327) is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``(a) In General.--'' before ``The''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) Evaluation of Flood Damage Reduction Measures.--In conducting 
the study, the Secretary shall evaluate flood damage reduction measures 
that would otherwise be excluded from the feasibility analysis based on 
policies of the Corps of Engineers concerning the frequency of 
flooding, the drainage area, and the amount of runoff.''.

SEC. 428. BUFFALO HARBOR, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the advisability and potential impacts of declaring as nonnavigable a 
portion of the channel at Control Point Draw, Buffalo Harbor, Buffalo 
New York.
    (b) Contents.--The study conducted under this section shall include 
an examination of other options to meet intermodal transportation needs 
in the area.

SEC. 429. HUDSON RIVER, MANHATTAN, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of establishing a Hudson River Park in Manhattan, New 
York City, New York. The study shall address the issues of shoreline 
protection, environmental protection and restoration, recreation, 
waterfront access, and open space for the area between Battery Place 
and West 59th Street.
    (b) Consultation.--In conducting the study under subsection (a), 
the Secretary shall consult the Hudson River Park Trust.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of 
this section, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
result of the study, including a master plan for the park.

SEC. 430. JAMESVILLE RESERVOIR, ONONDAGA COUNTY, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, flood damage 
reduction, and water quality, Jamesville Reservoir, Onondaga County, 
New York.

SEC. 431. STEUBENVIILLE, OHIO.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
developing a public port along the Ohio River in the vicinity of 
Steubenville, Ohio.

SEC. 432. GRAND LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    Section 560(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3783) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``date of enactment of this Act'' and 
        inserting ``date of enactment of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 2000''; and
            (2) by inserting ``and Miami'' after ``Pensacola Dam''.

SEC. 433. COLUMBIA SLOUGH, OREGON.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
the Secretary shall complete under section 1135 of the Water Resource 
Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2309a) a feasiblility study for the 
ecosystem restoration project at Columbia Slough, Oregon. If the 
Secretary determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary may 
carry out the project on an expedited basis under such section.

SEC. 434. REEDY RIVER, GREENVILLE, SOUTH CAROLINA.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, flood damage 
reduction, and streambank stabilization on the Reedy River, Cleveland 
Park West, Greenville, South Carolina.

SEC. 435. GERMANTOWN, TENNESSEE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine 
the feasibility of carrying out a project for flood control and related 
purposes along Miller Farms Ditch, Howard Road Drainage, and Wolf River 
Lateral D, Germantown, Tennessee.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--The Secretary--
            (1) shall credit toward the non-Federal share of the costs 
        of the feasibility study the value of the in-kind services 
        provided by the non-Federal interests relating to the planning, 
        engineering, and design of the project, whether carried out 
        before or after execution of the feasibility study cost-sharing 
        agreement if the Secretary determines the work is necessary for 
        completion of the study; and
            (2) for the purposes of paragraph (1), shall consider the 
        feasibility study to be conducted as part of the Memphis Metro 
        Tennessee and Mississippi study authorized by resolution of the 
        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, dated March 7, 
        1996.
    (c) Limitation.--The Secretary may not reject the project under the 
feasibility study based solely on a minimum amount of stream runoff.

SEC. 436. PARK CITY, UTAH.

    The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the feasibility of 
carrying out a project for water supply, Park City, Utah.

SEC. 437. MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall evaluate the report for the 
project for flood damage reduction and environmental restoration, 
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, entitled ``Interim Executive Summary: Menominee 
River Flood Management Plan'', dated September 1999, to determine 
whether the plans contained in the report are cost-effective, 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and in the Federal 
interest.
    (b) Report.--Not later than September 30, 2001, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report on the results of the evaluation.

SEC. 438. UPPER DES PLAINES RIVER AND TRIBUTARIES, ILLINOIS AND 
              WISCONSIN.

    Section 419 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 324-325) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide the non-Federal interest 
credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the study for work 
performed by the non-Federal interest before the date of the study's 
feasibility cost-share agreement if the Secretary determines that the 
work is integral to the study.''.

SEC. 439. DELAWARE RIVER WATERSHED.

    (a) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct studies and assessments to 
analyze the sources and impacts of sediment contamination in the 
Delaware River watershed.
    (b) Activities.--Activities authorized under this section shall be 
conducted by a university with expertise in research in contaminated 
sediment sciences.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section 
        $5,000,000. Such sums shall remain available until expended.
            (2) Corps of engineers expenses.--10 percent of the amounts 
        appropriated to carry out this section may be used by the Corps 
        of Engineers district offices to administer and implement 
        studies and assessments under this section.

                   TITLE V--MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS

SEC. 501. BRIDGEPORT, ALABAMA.

    (a) Determination.--The Secretary shall review the construction of 
a channel performed by the non-Federal interest at the project for 
navigation, Tennessee River, Bridgeport, Alabama, to determine the 
Federal navigation interest in such work.
    (b) Reimbursement.--If the Secretary determines under subsection 
(a) that the work performed by the non-Federal interest is consistent 
with the Federal navigation interest, the Secretary shall reimburse the 
non-Federal interest an amount equal to the Federal share of the cost 
of construction of the channel.

SEC. 502. DUCK RIVER, CULLMAN, ALABAMA.

    The Secretary shall provide technical assistance to the city of 
Cullman, Alabama, in the management of construction contracts for the 
reservoir project on the Duck River.

SEC. 503. SEWARD, ALASKA.

    The Secretary shall carry out, on an emergency one-time basis, 
necessary repairs of the Lowell Creek Tunnel in Seward, Alaska, at 
Federal expense and a total cost of $3,000,000.

SEC. 504. AUGUSTA AND DEVALLS BLUFF, ARKANSAS.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may operate, maintain, and 
rehabilitate 37 miles of levees in and around Augusta and Devalls 
Bluff, Arkansas.
    (b) Reimbursement.--After incurring any cost for operation, 
maintenance, or rehabilitation under subsection (a), the Secretary may 
seek reimbursement from the Secretary of the Interior of an amount 
equal to the portion of such cost that the Secretary determines is a 
benefit to a Federal wildlife refuge.

SEC. 505. BEAVER LAKE, ARKANSAS.

    The contract price for additional storage for the Carroll-Boone 
Water District beyond that which is provided for in section 521 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 345) shall be based 
on the original construction cost of Beaver Lake and adjusted to the 
2000 price level net of inflation between the date of initiation of 
construction and the date of enactment of this Act.

SEC. 506. MCCLELLAN-KERR ARKANSAS RIVER NAVIGATION SYSTEM, ARKANSAS AND 
              OKLAHOMA.

    Taking into account the need to realize the total economic 
potential of the McClellan-Kerr Arkansas River navigation system, the 
Secretary shall expedite completion of the Arkansas River navigation 
study, including the feasibility of increasing the authorized channel 
from 9 feet to 12 feet and, if justified, proceed directly to project 
preconstruction engineering and design.<plus-minus>

SEC. 507. CALFED BAY DELTA PROGRAM ASSISTANCE, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate with appropriate 
Federal and State agencies in planning and management activities 
associated with the CALFED Bay Delta Program (in this section referred 
to as the ``Program'') and shall, to the maximum extent practicable and 
in accordance with all applicable laws, integrate the activities of the 
Corps of Engineers in the San Joaquin and Sacramento River basins with 
the long-term goals of the Program.
    (b) Cooperative Activities.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary--
            (1) may accept and expend funds from other Federal agencies 
        and from public, private, and non-profit entities to carry out 
        ecosystem restoration projects and activities associated with 
        the Program; and
            (2) may enter into contracts, cooperative research and 
        development agreements, and cooperative agreements, with 
        Federal and public, private, and non-profit entities to carry 
        out such projects and activities.
    (c) Geographic Scope.--For the purposes of the participation of the 
Secretary under this section, the geographic scope of the Program shall 
be the San Francisco Bay and the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Estuary 
and their watershed (also known as the ``Bay-Delta Estuary''), as 
identified in the agreement entitled the ``Framework Agreement Between 
the Governor's Water Policy Council of the State of California and the 
Federal Ecosystem Directorate''.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $5,000,000 for fiscal years 2002 
through 2005.

SEC. 508. CLEAR LAKE BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    Amounts made available to the Secretary by the Energy and Water 
Appropriations Act, 2000 (113 Stat. 483 et seq.) for the project for 
aquatic ecosystem restoration, Clear Lake basin, California, to be 
carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), may only be used for the wetlands restoration 
and creation elements of the project.

SEC. 509. CONTRA COSTA CANAL, OAKLEY AND KNIGHTSEN, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out a project for flood damage reduction 
under section 205 of the Flood Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) at 
the Contra Costa Canal, Oakley and Knightsen, California, if the 
Secretary determines that the project is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 510. HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) a project for flood damage 
reduction in Huntington Beach, California, if the Secretary determines 
that the project is technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and 
economically justified.

SEC. 511. MALLARD SLOUGH, PITTSBURG, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall carry out under section 205 of the Flood 
Control Act of 1948 (33 U.S.C. 701s) a project for flood damage 
reduction in Mallard Slough, Pittsburg, California, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is technically sound, environmentally 
acceptable, and economically justified.

SEC. 512. PENN MINE, CALAVERAS COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal 
interest for the project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Penn Mine, 
Calaveras County, California, carried out under section 206 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2330), $4,100,000 
for the Federal share of costs incurred by the non-Federal interest for 
work carried out by the non-Federal interest for the project.
    (b) Source of Funding.--Reimbursement under subsection (a) shall be 
from amounts appropriated before the date of enactment of this Act for 
the project described in subsection (a).

SEC. 513. PORT OF SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) Emergency Measures.--The Secretary shall carry out, on an 
emergency basis, measures to address health, safety, and environmental 
risks posed by floatables and floating debris originating from Piers 24 
and 64 in the Port of San Francisco, California, by removing such 
floatables and debris.
    (b) Study.--The Secretary shall conduct a study to determine the 
risk to navigation posed by floatables and floating debris originating 
from Piers 24 and 64 in the Port of San Francisco, California, and the 
cost of removing such floatables and debris.
    (c) Funding.--There is authorized to be appropriated $3,000,000 to 
carry out this section.

SEC. 514. SAN GABRIEL BASIN, CALIFORNIA.

    (a) San Gabriel Basin Restoration.--
            (1) Establishment of fund.--There shall be established 
        within the Treasury of the United States an interest bearing 
        account to be known as the San Gabriel Basin Restoration Fund 
        (in this section referred to as the ``Restoration Fund'').
            (2) Administration of fund.--The Restoration Fund shall be 
        administered by the Secretary, in cooperation with the San 
        Gabriel Basin Water Quality Authority or its successor agency.
            (3) Purposes of fund.--
                    (A) In general.--Subject to subparagraph (B), the 
                amounts in the Restoration Fund, including interest 
                accrued, shall be utilized by the Secretary--
                            (i) to design and construct water quality 
                        projects to be administered by the San Gabriel 
                        Basin Water Quality Authority and the Central 
                        Basin Water Quality Project to be administered 
                        by the Central Basin Municipal Water District; 
                        and
                            (ii) to operate and maintain any project 
                        constructed under this section for such period 
                        as the Secretary determines, but not to exceed 
                        10 years, following the initial date of 
                        operation of the project.
                    (B) Cost-sharing limitation.--The Secretary may not 
                obligate any funds appropriated to the Restoration Fund 
in a fiscal year until the Secretary has deposited in the Fund an 
amount provided by non-Federal interests sufficient to ensure that at 
least 35 percent of any funds obligated by the Secretary are from funds 
provided to the Secretary by the non-Federal interests. The San Gabriel 
Basin Water Quality Authority shall be responsible for providing the 
non-Federal amount required by the preceding sentence. The State of 
California, local government agencies, and private entities may provide 
all or any portion of such amount.
    (b) Compliance With Applicable Law.--In carrying out the activities 
described in this section, the Secretary shall comply with any 
applicable Federal and State laws.
    (c) Relationship to Other Activities.--Nothing in this section 
shall be construed to affect other Federal or State authorities that 
are being used or may be used to facilitate the cleanup and protection 
of the San Gabriel and Central groundwater basins. In carrying out the 
activities described in this section, the Secretary shall integrate 
such activities with ongoing Federal and State projects and activities. 
None of the funds made available for such activities pursuant to this 
section shall be counted against any Federal authorization ceiling 
established for any previously authorized Federal projects or 
activities.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated to 
        the Restoration Fund established under subsection (a) 
        $85,000,000. Such funds shall remain available until expended.
            (2) Set-aside.--Of the amounts appropriated under paragraph 
        (1), no more than $10,000,000 shall be available to carry out 
        the Central Basin Water Quality Project.
    (e) Adjustment.--Of the $25,000,000 made available for San Gabriel 
Basin Groundwater Restoration, California, under the heading 
``Construction, General'' in title I of the Energy and Water 
Development Appropriations Act, 2001--
            (1) $2,000,000 shall be available only for studies and 
        other investigative activities and planning and design of 
        projects determined by the Secretary to offer a long-term 
        solution to the problem of groundwater contamination caused by 
        perchlorates at sites located in the city of Santa Clarita, 
        California; and
            (2) $23,000,000 shall be deposited in the Restoration Fund, 
        of which $4,000,000 shall be used for remediation in the 
        Central Basin, California.

SEC. 515. STOCKTON, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall evaluate the feasibility of the Lower Mosher 
Slough element and the levee extensions on the Upper Calaveras River 
element of the project for flood control, Stockton Metropolitan Area, 
California, carried out under section 211(f)(3) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3683), to determine the eligibility 
of such elements for reimbursement under section 211 of such Act (33 
U.S.C. 701b-13). If the Secretary determines that such elements are 
technically sound, environmentally acceptable, and economically 
justified, the Secretary shall reimburse under section 211 of such Act 
the non-Federal interest for the Federal share of the cost of such 
elements.

SEC. 516. PORT EVERGLADES, FLORIDA.

    Notwithstanding the absence of a project cooperation agreement, the 
Secretary shall reimburse the non-Federal interest for the project for 
navigation, Port Everglades Harbor, Florida, $15,003,000 for the 
Federal share of costs incurred by the non-Federal interest in carrying 
out the project and determined by the Secretary to be eligible for 
reimbursement under the limited reevaluation report of the Corps of 
Engineers, dated April 1998.

SEC. 517. FLORIDA KEYS WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--In coordination with the Florida Keys Aqueduct 
Authority, appropriate agencies of municipalities of Monroe County, 
Florida, and other appropriate public agencies of the State of Florida 
or Monroe County, the Secretary may provide technical and financial 
assistance to carry out projects for the planning, design, and 
construction of treatment works to improve water quality in the Florida 
Keys National Marine Sanctuary.
    (b) Criteria for Projects.--Before entering into a cooperation 
agreement to provide assistance with respect to a project under this 
section, the Secretary shall ensure that--
            (1) the non-Federal sponsor has completed adequate planning 
        and design activities, as applicable;
            (2) the non-Federal sponsor has completed a financial plan 
        identifying sources of non-Federal funding for the project;
            (3) the project complies with--
                    (A) applicable growth management ordinances of 
                Monroe County, Florida;
                    (B) applicable agreements between Monroe County, 
                Florida, and the State of Florida to manage growth in 
                Monroe County, Florida; and
                    (C) applicable water quality standards; and
            (4) the project is consistent with the master wastewater 
        and stormwater plans for Monroe County, Florida.
    (c) Consideration.--In selecting projects under subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall consider whether a project will have substantial water 
quality benefits relative to other projects under consideration.
    (d) Consultation.--In carrying out this section, the Secretary 
shall consult with--
            (1) the Water Quality Steering Committee established under 
        section 8(d)(2)(A) of the Florida Keys National Marine 
        Sanctuary and Protection Act (106 Stat. 5054);
            (2) the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force 
        established by section 528(f) of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3771-3773);
            (3) the Commission on the Everglades established by 
        executive order of the Governor of the State of Florida; and
            (4) other appropriate State and local government officials.
    (e) Non-Federal Share.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of a 
        project carried out under this section shall be 35 percent.
            (2) Credit.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary may provide the non-
                Federal interest credit toward cash contributions 
                required--
                            (i) before and during the construction of 
                        the project, for the costs of planning, 
                        engineering, and design, and for the 
                        construction management work that is performed 
                        by the non-Federal interest and that the 
                        Secretary determines is necessary to implement 
                        the project; and
                            (ii) during the construction of the 
                        project, for the construction that the non-
                        Federal interest carries out on behalf of the 
                        Secretary and that the Secretary determines is 
                        necessary to carry out the project.
                    (B) Treatment of credit between projects.--Any 
                credit provided under this paragraph may be carried 
                over between authorized projects.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $100,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.

SEC. 518. BALLARD'S ISLAND, LASALLE COUNTY, ILLINOIS.

    The Secretary may provide the non-Federal interest for the project 
for the improvement of the quality of the environment, Ballard's 
Island, LaSalle County, Illinois, carried out under section 1135 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C 2309a), credit toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of the project for work performed by 
the non-Federal interest after July 1, 1999, if the Secretary 
determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 519. LAKE MICHIGAN DIVERSION, ILLINOIS.

    Section 1142(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (110 
Stat. 4253; 113 Stat. 339) is amended by inserting after ``2003'' the 
following: ``and $800,000 for each fiscal year beginning after 
September 30, 2003,''.

SEC. 520. KOONTZ LAKE, INDIANA.

    The Secretary shall provide the non-Federal interest for the 
project for aquatic ecosystem restoration, Koontz Lake, Indiana, 
carried out under section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 
1996 (22 U.S.C. 2330), credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project for work performed by the non-Federal interest before 
the date of execution of the project cooperation agreement if the 
Secretary determines that the work is integral to the project.

SEC. 521. CAMPBELLSVILLE LAKE, KENTUCKY.

    The Secretary shall repair the retaining wall and dam at 
Campbellsville Lake, Kentucky, to protect the public road on top of the 
dam at Federal expense and a total cost of $200,000.

SEC. 522. WEST VIEW SHORES, CECIL COUNTY, MARYLAND.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Secretary shall carry out an investigation of the contamination of the 
well system in West View Shores, Cecil County, Maryland. If the 
Secretary determines that a disposal site for a Federal navigation 
project has contributed to the contamination of the well system, the 
Secretary may provide alternative water supplies, including replacement 
of wells, at Federal expense.

SEC. 523. CONSERVATION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, CHESAPEAKE BAY, MARYLAND 
              AND VIRGINIA.

    Section 704(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 
U.S.C. 2263(b)) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``In 
addition, there is authorized to be appropriated $20,000,000 to carry 
out paragraph (4).''.

SEC. 524. MUDDY RIVER, BROOKLINE AND BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS.

    The Secretary shall carry out the project for flood damage 
reduction and environmental restoration, Muddy River, Brookline and 
Boston, Massachusetts, substantially in accordance with the plans, and 
subject to the conditions, described in the draft evaluation report of 
the New England District Engineer entitled ``Phase I Muddy River Master 
Plan'', dated June 2000.

SEC. 525. SOO LOCKS, SAULT STE. MARIE, MICHIGAN.

    The Secretary may not require a cargo vessel equipped with bow 
thrusters and friction winches that is transiting the Soo Locks in 
Sault Ste. Marie, Michigan, to provide more than 2 crew members to 
serve as line handlers on the pier of a lock, except in adverse weather 
conditions or if there is a mechanical failure on the vessel.

SEC. 526. DULUTH, MINNESOTA, ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGY PROJECT.

    (a) Project Authorization.--Section 541(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3777) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``implement'' and inserting ``conduct full 
        scale demonstrations of''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period the following: ``, 
        including technologies evaluated for the New York/New Jersey 
        Harbor under section 405 of the Water Resources Development Act 
        of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2239 note; 106 Stat. 4863)''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 541(b) of such Act is 
amended by striking ``$1,000,000'' and inserting ``$3,000,000''.

SEC. 527. MINNEAPOLIS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the State of 
Minnesota, shall design and construct the project for environmental 
restoration and recreation, Minneapolis, Minnesota, substantially in 
accordance with the plans described in the report entitled 
``Feasibility Study for Mississippi Whitewater Park, Minneapolis, 
Minnesota'', prepared for the Minnesota department of natural 
resources, dated June 30, 1999.
    (b) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project shall be determined in accordance with title I of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2211 et 
        seq.).
            (2) Lands, easements, and rights-of-way.--The non-Federal 
        interest shall provide all lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
        relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for 
        construction of the project and shall receive credit for the 
        cost of providing such lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
        relocations, and dredged material disposal areas toward the 
        non-Federal share of the cost of the project.
            (3) Operation, maintenance, repair, rehabilitation, and 
        replacement.--The operation, maintenance, repair, 
        rehabilitation, and replacement of the project shall be a non-
        Federal responsibility.
            (4) Credit for non-federal work.--The non-Federal interest 
        shall receive credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
        of the project for work performed by the non-Federal interest 
        before the date of execution of the project cooperation 
        agreement if the Secretary determines that the work is integral 
        to the project.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 528. ST. LOUIS COUNTY, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall carry out under section 204 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) a project in St. 
Louis County, Minnesota, by making beneficial use of dredged material 
from a Federal navigation project.

SEC. 529. WILD RICE RIVER, MINNESOTA.

    The Secretary shall prepare a general reevaluation report on the 
project for flood control, Wild Rice River, Minnesota, authorized by 
section 201 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (84 Stat. 1825), and, if 
the Secretary determines that the project is technically sound, 
environmentally acceptable, and economically justified, shall carry out 
the project. In carrying out the reevaluation, the Secretary shall 
include river dredging as a component of the study.

SEC. 530. COASTAL MISSISSIPPI WETLANDS RESTORATION PROJECTS.

    (a) In General.--In order to further the purposes of section 204 of 
the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326) and 
section 206 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 
2330), the Secretary shall participate in restoration projects for 
critical coastal wetlands and coastal barrier islands in the State of 
Mississippi that will produce, consistent with existing Federal 
programs, projects, and activities, immediate and substantial 
restoration, preservation, and ecosystem protection benefits, including 
the beneficial use of dredged material if such use is a cost-effective 
means of disposal of such material.
    (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary, in coordination with other 
Federal, tribal, State, and local agencies, may identify and implement 
projects described in subsection (a) after entering into an agreement 
with an appropriate non-Federal interest in accordance with this 
section.
    (c) Cost Sharing.--Before implementing any project under this 
section, the Secretary shall enter into a binding agreement with the 
non-Federal interests. The agreement shall provide that the non-Federal 
responsibility for the project shall be as follows:
            (1) To acquire any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
        relocations, and dredged material disposal areas necessary for 
        implementation of the project.
            (2) To hold and save harmless the United States free from 
        claims or damages due to implementation of the project, except 
        for the negligence of the Federal Government or its 
        contractors.
            (3) To pay 35 percent of project costs.
    (d) Nonprofit Entity.--For any project undertaken under this 
section, a non-Federal interest may include a nonprofit entity with the 
consent of the affected local government.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $10,000,000.

SEC. 531. MISSOURI RIVER VALLEY IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Missouri River Mitigation Project.--The project for mitigation 
of fish and wildlife losses, Missouri River Bank Stabilization and 
Navigation Project, Missouri, Kansas, Iowa, and Nebraska authorized by 
section 601(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4143) and modified by section 334 of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 306), is further modified to 
authorize $200,000,000 for fiscal years 2001 through 2010 to be 
appropriated to the Secretary for acquisition of 118,650 acres of land 
and interests in land for the project.
    (b) Upper Missouri River Aquatic and Riparian Habitat Mitigation 
Program.--
            (1) In general.--
                    (A) Study.--The Secretary shall complete a study 
                that analyzes the need for additional measures for 
                mitigation of losses of aquatic and terrestrial habitat 
                from Fort Peck Dam to Sioux City, Iowa, resulting from 
                the operation of the Missouri River Mainstem Reservoir 
                project in the States of Nebraska, South Dakota, North 
                Dakota, and Montana.
                    (B) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date 
                of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit 
                to Congress a report describing the results of the 
                study.
            (2) Pilot program.--The Secretary, in consultation with the 
        Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service and the 
        affected State fish and wildlife agencies, shall develop and 
        administer a pilot mitigation program that--
                    (A) involves the experimental releases of warm 
                water from the spillways at Fort Peck Dam during the 
                appropriate spawning periods for native fish;
                    (B) involves the monitoring of the response of fish 
                to, and the effectiveness toward the preservation of 
                native fish and wildlife habitat as a result of, such 
                releases; and
                    (C) requires the Secretary to provide compensation 
                for any loss of hydropower at Fort Peck Dam resulting 
                from implementation of the pilot program; and
                    (D) does not effect a change in the Missouri River 
                Master Water Control Manual.
            (3) Reservoir fish loss study.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary, in consultation 
                with the North Dakota Game and Fish Department and the 
                South Dakota Department of Game, Fish and Parks, shall 
                complete a study to analyze and recommend measures to 
                avoid or reduce the loss of fish, including rainbow 
                smelt, through Garrison Dam in North Dakota and Oahe 
                Dam in South Dakota.
                    (B) Report.--Not later than 2 years after the date 
                of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit 
                to Congress a report describing the results of the 
                study.
            (4) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated--
                    (A) to complete the study under paragraph (3) 
                $200,000; and
                    (B) to carry out the other provisions of this 
                subsection $1,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 
                through 2010.
    (c) Missouri and Middle Mississippi Rivers Enhancement Project.--
Section 514(g) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 342) is amended to read as follows:
    ``(g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to pay the Federal share of the cost of carrying out 
activities under this section $5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 
through 2010.''.

SEC. 532. NEW MADRID COUNTY, MISSOURI.

    For purposes of determining the non-Federal share for the project 
for navigation, New Madrid County Harbor, Missouri, carried out under 
section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), the 
Secretary shall consider Phases 1 and 2 as described in the report of 
the District Engineer, dated February 2000, as one project and provide 
credit to the non-Federal interest toward the non-Federal share of the 
combined project for work performed by the non-Federal interest on 
Phase 1 of the project.

SEC. 533. PEMISCOT COUNTY, MISSOURI.

    The Secretary shall provide the non-Federal interest for the 
project for navigation, Caruthersville Harbor, Pemiscot County, 
Missouri, carried out under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1960 (33 U.S.C. 577), credit toward the non-Federal share of the cost 
of the project for in-kind work performed by the non-Federal interest 
after December 1, 1997, if the Secretary determines that the work is 
integral to the project.

SEC. 534. LAS VEGAS, NEVADA.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Committee.--The term ``Committee'' means the Las Vegas 
        Wash Coordinating Committee.
            (2) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the Las Vegas Wash 
        comprehensive adaptive management plan, developed by the 
        Committee and dated January 20, 2000.
            (3) Project.--The term ``Project'' means the Las Vegas Wash 
        wetlands restoration and Lake Mead water quality improvement 
        project and includes the programs, features, components, 
        projects, and activities identified in the Plan.
    (b) Participation in Project.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, in conjunction with the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the 
        Secretary of Agriculture, and the Secretary of the Interior and 
        in partnership with the Committee, shall participate in the 
        implementation of the Project to restore wetlands at Las Vegas 
        Wash and to improve water quality in Lake Mead in accordance 
        with the Plan.
            (2) Cost sharing requirements.--
                    (A) In general.--The non-Federal interests shall 
                pay 35 percent of the cost of any project carried out 
                under this section.
                    (B) Operation and maintenance.--The non-Federal 
                interests shall be responsible for all costs associated 
                with operating, maintaining, replacing, repairing, and 
                rehabilitating all projects carried out under this 
                section.
                    (C) Federal lands.--Notwithstanding any other 
                provision of this subsection, the Federal share of the 
                cost of a project carried out under this section on 
                Federal lands shall be 100 percent, including the costs 
                of operation and maintenance.
            (3) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated $10,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 535. NEWARK, NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--Using authorities under law in effect on the date 
of enactment of this Act, the Secretary, the Director of the Federal 
Emergency Management Agency, the Administrator of the Environmental 
Protection Agency, and the heads of other appropriate Federal agencies 
shall assist the State of New Jersey in developing and implementing a 
comprehensive basinwide strategy in the Passaic, Hackensack, Raritan, 
and Atlantic Coast floodplain areas for coordinated and integrated 
management of land and water resources to improve water quality, reduce 
flood hazards, and ensure sustainable economic activity.
    (b) Technical Assistance, Staff, and Financial Support.--The heads 
of the Federal agencies referred to in subsection (a) may provide 
technical assistance, staff, and financial support for the development 
of the floodplain management strategy.
    (c) Flexibility.--The heads of the Federal agencies referred to in 
subsection (a) shall exercise flexibility to reduce barriers to 
efficient and effective implementation of the floodplain management 
strategy.
    (d) Research.--In coordination with academic and research 
institutions for support, the Secretary may conduct a study to carry 
out this section.

SEC. 536. URBANIZED PEAK FLOOD MANAGEMENT RESEARCH, NEW JERSEY.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall develop and implement a 
research program to evaluate opportunities to manage peak flood flows 
in urbanized watersheds located in the State of New Jersey.
    (b) Scope of Research.--The research program authorized by 
subsection (a) shall be accomplished through the New York District of 
Corps of Engineers. The research shall include the following:
            (1) Identification of key factors in the development of an 
        urbanized watershed that affect peak flows in the watershed and 
        downstream.
            (2) Development of peak flow management models for 4 to 6 
        watersheds in urbanized areas with widely differing geology, 
        shapes, and soil types that can be used to determine optimal 
        flow reduction factors for individual watersheds.
    (c) Location.--The activities authorized by this section shall be 
carried out at the facility authorized by section 103(d) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 106 Stat. 4812-4813, which may be 
located on the campus of the New Jersey Institute of Technology.
    (d) Report to Congress.--The Secretary shall evaluate policy 
changes in the planning process for flood damage reduction projects 
based on the results of the research under this section and transmit to 
Congress a report on such results not later than 3 years after the date 
of enactment of this Act.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $11,000,000 for fiscal years 
beginning after September 30, 2000.

SEC. 537. BLACK ROCK CANAL, BUFFALO, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall provide technical assistance in support of 
activities of non-Federal interests related to the dredging of Black 
Rock Canal in the area between the Ferry Street Overpass and the Peace 
Bridge Overpass in Buffalo, New York.

SEC. 538. HAMBURG, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall complete the study of a project for shoreline 
erosion, Old Lake Shore Road, Hamburg, New York, and, if the Secretary 
determines that the project is feasible, the Secretary shall carry out 
the project.

SEC. 539. NEPPERHAN RIVER, YONKERS, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall provide technical assistance to the city of 
Yonkers, New York, in support of activities relating to the dredging of 
the Nepperhan River outlet, New York.

SEC. 540. ROCHESTER, NEW YORK.

    The Secretary shall complete the study of a project for navigation, 
Rochester Harbor, Rochester, New York, and, if the Secretary determines 
that the project is feasible, the Secretary shall carry out the 
project.

SEC. 541. UPPER MOHAWK RIVER BASIN, NEW YORK.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with the Secretary 
of Agriculture and the State of New York, shall conduct a study, 
develop a strategy, and implement a project to reduce flood damages, 
improve water quality, and create wildlife habitat through wetlands 
restoration, soil and water conservation practices, nonstructural 
measures, and other appropriate means in the Upper Mohawk River Basin, 
at an estimated Federal cost of $10,000,000.
    (b) Implementation of Strategy.--The Secretary shall implement the 
strategy under this section in cooperation with local landowners and 
local government. Projects to implement the strategy shall be designed 
to take advantage of ongoing or planned actions by other agencies, 
local municipalities, or nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations with 
expertise in wetlands restoration that would increase the effectiveness 
or decrease the overall cost of implementing recommended projects and 
may include the acquisition of wetlands, from willing sellers, that 
contribute to the Upper Mohawk River basin ecosystem.
    (c) Cooperation Agreements.--In carrying out activities under this 
section, the Secretary shall enter into cooperation agreements to 
provide financial assistance to appropriate Federal, State, and local 
government agencies as well as appropriate nonprofit, nongovernmental 
organizations with expertise in wetlands restoration, with the consent 
of the affected local government. Financial assistance provided may 
include activities for the implementation of wetlands restoration 
projects and soil and water conservation measures.
    (d) Non-Federal Share.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
activities carried out under this section shall be 25 percent and may 
be provided through in-kind services and materials.
    (e) Upper Mohawk River Basin Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Upper Mohawk River basin'' means the Mohawk River, its tributaries, 
and associated lands upstream of the confluence of the Mohawk River and 
Canajoharie Creek, and including Canajoharie Creek, New York.

SEC. 542. EASTERN NORTH CAROLINA FLOOD PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--In order to assist the State of North Carolina and 
local governments in mitigating damages resulting from a major 
disaster, the Secretary shall carry out flood damage reduction projects 
in eastern North Carolina by protecting, clearing, and restoring 
channel dimensions (including removing accumulated snags and other 
debris) in the following rivers and tributaries:
            (1) New River and tributaries.
            (2) White Oak River and tributaries.
            (3) Neuse River and tributaries.
            (4) Pamlico River and tributaries.
    (b) Cost Share.--The non-Federal interest for a project under this 
section shall--
            (1) pay 35 percent of the cost of the project; and
            (2) provide any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
        relocations, and material disposal areas necessary for 
        implementation of the project.
    (c) Conditions.--The Secretary may not reject a project based 
solely on a minimum amount of stream runoff.
    (d) Major Disaster Defined.--In this section, the term ``major 
disaster'' means a major disaster declared under title IV of the Robert 
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 
5170 et seq.) and includes any major disaster declared before the date 
of enactment of this Act.
    (e) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,000,000 for fiscal years 2001 
through 2003.

SEC. 543. CUYAHOGA RIVER, OHIO.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide technical assistance 
to non-Federal interests for an evaluation of the structural integrity 
of the bulkhead system located along the Cuyahoga River in the vicinity 
of Cleveland, Ohio, at a total cost of $500,000.
    (b) Evaluation.--The evaluation described in subsection (a) shall 
include design analysis, plans and specifications, and cost estimates 
for repair or replacement of the bulkhead system.

SEC. 544. CROWDER POINT, CROWDER, OKLAHOMA.

    At the request of the city of Crowder, Oklahoma, the Secretary 
shall enter into a long-term lease, not to exceed 99 years, with the 
city under which the city may develop, operate, and maintain as a 
public park all or a portion of approximately 260 acres of land known 
as Crowder Point on Lake Eufaula, Oklahoma. The lease shall include 
such terms and conditions as the Secretary determines are necessary to 
protect the interest of the United States and project purposes and 
shall be made without consideration to the United States.

SEC. 545. OKLAHOMA-TRIBAL COMMISSION.

    (a) Findings.--The House of Representatives makes the following 
findings:
            (1) The unemployment rate in southeastern Oklahoma is 23 
        percent greater than the national average.
            (2) The per capita income in southeastern Oklahoma is 62 
        percent of the national average.
            (3) Reflecting the inadequate job opportunities and 
        dwindling resources in poor rural communities, southeastern 
        Oklahoma is experiencing an out-migration of people.
            (4) Water represents a vitally important resource in 
        southeastern Oklahoma. Its abundance offers an opportunity for 
        the residents to benefit from their natural resources.
            (5) Trends as described in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) are 
        not conducive to local economic development, and efforts to 
        improve the management of water in the region would have a 
        positive outside influence on the local economy, help reverse 
        these trends, and improve the lives of local residents.
    (b) Sense of House of Representatives.--In view of the findings 
described in subsection (a), and in order to assist communities in 
southeastern Oklahoma in benefiting from their local resources, it is 
the sense of the House of Representatives that--
            (1) the State of Oklahoma and the Choctaw Nation of 
        Oklahoma and the Chickasaw Nation, Oklahoma, should establish a 
        State-tribal commission composed equally of representatives of 
        such Nations and residents of the water basins within the 
        boundaries of such Nations for the purpose of administering and 
        distributing from the sale of water any benefits and net 
        revenues to the tribes and local entities within the respective 
        basins;
            (2) any sale of water to entities outside the basins should 
        be consistent with the procedures and requirements established 
        by the commission; and
            (3) if requested, the Secretary should provide technical 
        assistance, as appropriate, to facilitate the efforts of the 
        commission.

SEC. 546. COLUMBIA RIVER, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    (a) Modeling and Forecasting System.--The Secretary shall develop 
and implement a modeling and forecasting system for the Columbia River 
estuary, Oregon and Washington, to provide real-time information on 
existing and future wave, current, tide, and wind conditions.
    (b) Use of Contracts and Grants.--In carrying out this section, the 
Secretary is encouraged to use contracts, cooperative agreements, and 
grants with colleges and universities and other non-Federal entities.

SEC. 547. JOHN DAY POOL, OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    (a) Extinguishment of Reversionary Interests and Use 
Restrictions.--With respect to the lands described in each deed listed 
in subsection (b)--
            (1) the reversionary interests and the use restrictions 
        relating to port or industrial purposes are extinguished;
            (2) the human habitation or other building structure use 
        restriction is extinguished in each area where the elevation is 
        above the standard project flood elevation; and
            (3) the use of fill material to raise areas above the 
        standard project flood elevation, without increasing the risk 
        of flooding in or outside of the floodplain, is authorized, 
        except in any area constituting wetland for which a permit 
        under section 404 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act 
        (33 U.S.C. 1344) would be required.
    (b) Affected Deeds.--The following deeds are referred to in 
subsection (a):
            (1) The deeds executed by the United States and bearing 
        Morrow County, Oregon, Auditor's Microfilm Numbers 229 and 
        16226.
            (2) The deed executed by the United States and bearing 
        Benton County, Washington, Auditor's File Number 601766, but 
        only as that deed applies to the following portion of lands 
        conveyed by that deed:
                    A tract of land lying in Section 7, Township 5 
                north, Range 28 east of the Willamette meridian, Benton 
                County, Washington, said tract being more particularly 
                described as follows:
                            Commencing at the point of intersection of 
                        the centerlines of Plymouth Street and Third 
                        Avenue in the First Addition to the Town of 
                        Plymouth (according to the duly recorded Plat 
                        thereof);
                            thence westerly along the said centerline 
                        of Third Avenue, a distance of 565 feet;
                            thence south 54 deg. 10' west, to a point 
                        on the west line of Tract 18 of said Addition 
                        and the true point of beginning;
                            thence north, parallel with the west line 
                        of said Section 7, to a point on the north line 
                        of said Section 7;
                            thence west along the north line thereof to 
                        the northwest corner of said Section 7;
                            thence south along the west line of said 
                        Section 7 to a point on the ordinary high water 
                        line of the Columbia River;
                            thence northeasterly along said high water 
                        line to a point on the north and south 
                        coordinate line of the Oregon Coordinate 
                        System, North Zone, said coordinate line being 
                        east 2,291,000 feet;
                            thence north along said line to a point on 
                        the south line of First Avenue of said 
                        Addition;
                            thence westerly along First Avenue to a 
                        point on southerly extension of the west line 
                        of Tract 18;
                            thence northerly along said west line of 
                        Tract 18 to the point of beginning.
            (3) The deed recorded October 17, 1967, in book 291, page 
        148, Deed of Records of Umatilla County, Oregon, executed by 
        the United States.
    (c) No Effect on Other Needs.--Nothing in this section affects the 
remaining rights and interests of the Corps of Engineers for authorized 
project purposes.

SEC. 548. LOWER COLUMBIA RIVER AND TILLAMOOK BAY ESTUARY PROGRAM, 
              OREGON AND WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall conduct studies and ecosystem 
restoration projects for the lower Columbia River and Tillamook Bay 
estuaries, Oregon and Washington.
    (b) Use of Management Plans.--
            (1) Lower columbia river estuary.--
                    (A) In general.--In carrying out ecosystem 
                restoration projects under this section, the Secretary 
                shall use as a guide the Lower Columbia River estuary 
                program's comprehensive conservation and management 
                plan developed under section 320 of the Federal Water 
                Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1330).
                    (B) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out 
                ecosystem restoration projects under this section for 
                the lower Columbia River estuary in consultation with 
                the States of Oregon and Washington, the Environmental 
                Protection Agency, the United States Fish and Wildlife 
                Service, the National Marine Fisheries Service, and the 
                Forest Service.
            (2) Tillamook bay estuary.--
                    (A) In general.--In carrying out ecosystem 
                restoration projects under this section, the Secretary 
                shall use as a guide the Tillamook Bay national estuary 
                project's comprehensive conservation and management 
                plan developed under section 320 of the Federal Water 
                Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1330).
                    (B) Consultation.--The Secretary shall carry out 
                ecosystem restoration projects under this section for 
                the Tillamook Bay estuary in consultation with the 
                State of Oregon, the Environmental Protection Agency, 
                the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, the 
                National Marine Fisheries Service, and the Forest 
                Service.
    (c) Authorized Activities.--
            (1) In general.--In carrying out ecosystem restoration 
        projects under this section, the Secretary shall undertake 
        activities necessary to protect, monitor, and restore fish and 
        wildlife habitat.
            (2) Limitations.--The Secretary may not carry out any 
        activity under this section that adversely affects--
                    (A) the water-related needs of the lower Columbia 
                River estuary or the Tillamook Bay estuary, including 
                navigation, recreation, and water supply needs; or
                    (B) private property rights.
    (d) Priority.--In determining the priority of projects to be 
carried out under this section, the Secretary shall consult with the 
Implementation Committee of the Lower Columbia River Estuary Program 
and the Performance Partnership Council of the Tillamook Bay National 
Estuary Project, and shall consider the recommendations of such 
entities.
    (e) Cost-Sharing Requirements.--
            (1) Studies.--Studies conducted under this section shall be 
        subject to cost sharing in accordance with section 105 of the 
        Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 2215).
            (2) Ecosystem restoration projects.--
                    (A) In general.--Non-Federal interests shall pay 35 
                percent of the cost of any ecosystem restoration 
                project carried out under this section.
                    (B) Items provided by non-federal interests.--Non-
                Federal interests shall provide all land, easements, 
                rights-of-way, dredged material disposal areas, and 
                relocations necessary for ecosystem restoration 
                projects to be carried out under this section. The 
                value of such land, easements, rights-of-way, dredged 
                material disposal areas, and relocations shall be 
                credited toward the payment required under this 
                paragraph.
                    (C) In-kind contributions.--Not more than 50 
                percent of the non-Federal share required under this 
                subsection may be satisfied by the provision of in-kind 
                services.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--Non-Federal interests shall 
        be responsible for all costs associated with operating, 
        maintaining, replacing, repairing, and rehabilitating all 
        projects carried out under this section.
            (4) Federal lands.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        this subsection, the Federal share of the cost of a project 
        carried out under this section on Federal lands shall be 100 
        percent, including costs of operation and maintenance.
    (f) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Lower columbia river estuary.--The term ``lower 
        Columbia River estuary'' means those river reaches having 
        navigation channels on the mainstem of the Columbia River in 
        Oregon and Washington west of Bonneville Dam, and the 
        tributaries of such reaches to the extent such tributaries are 
        tidally influenced.
            (2) Tillamook bay estuary.--The term ``Tillamook Bay 
        estuary'' means those waters of Tillamook Bay in Oregon and its 
        tributaries that are tidally influenced.
    (g) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 549. SKINNER BUTTE PARK, EUGENE, OREGON.

    Section 546(b) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 351) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``If the 
Secretary participates in the project, the Secretary shall carry out a 
monitoring program for 3 years after construction to evaluate the 
ecological and engineering effectiveness of the project and its 
applicability to other sites in the Willamette Valley.''.

SEC. 550. WILLAMETTE RIVER BASIN, OREGON.

    Section 547 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 
Stat. 351-352) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Research.--In coordination with academic and research 
institutions for support, the Secretary may conduct a study to carry 
out this section.''.

SEC. 551. LACKAWANNA RIVER, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--Section 539(a) of the Water Resources Development 
Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3776) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``and'' at the end of paragraph (1)(A);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (1)(B) 
        and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) the Lackawanna River, Pennsylvania.''.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--Section 539(d) of such Act 
(110 Stat. 3776-3777) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``(a)(1)(A) and'' and inserting 
        ``(a)(1)(A),''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, and $5,000,000 for projects undertaken 
        under subsection (a)(1)(C)'' before the period at the end.

SEC. 552. PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary shall provide assistance to the 
Delaware River Port Authority to deepen the Delaware River at Pier 122 
in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated $1,000,000 to carry out this section.

SEC. 553. ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS, RAYSTOWN LAKE, PENNSYLVANIA.

    The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania may transfer any unobligated funds 
made available to the Commonwealth for item number 1278 of the table 
contained in section 1602 of Public Law 105-178, to the Secretary for 
access improvements at the Raystown Lake project, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 554. UPPER SUSQUEHANNA RIVER BASIN, PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW YORK.

    Section 567 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3787-3788) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (a)(2) and inserting the 
        following:
            ``(2) The Susquehanna River watershed upstream of the 
        Chemung River, New York, at an estimated Federal cost of 
        $10,000,000.''; and
            (2) by striking subsections (c) and (d) and inserting the 
        following:
    ``(c) Cooperation Agreements.--In conducting the study and 
developing the strategy under this section, the Secretary shall enter 
into cooperation agreements to provide financial assistance to 
appropriate Federal, State, and local government agencies as well as 
appropriate nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations with expertise in 
wetlands restoration, with the consent of the affected local 
government. Financial assistance provided may include activities for 
the implementation of wetlands restoration projects and soil and water 
conservation measures.
    ``(d) Implementation of Strategy.--The Secretary shall undertake 
development and implementation of the strategy under this section in 
cooperation with local landowners and local government officials. 
Projects to implement the strategy shall be designed to take advantage 
of ongoing or planned actions by other agencies, local municipalities, 
or nonprofit, nongovernmental organizations with expertise in wetlands 
restoration that would increase the effectiveness or decrease the 
overall cost of implementing recommended projects and may include the 
acquisition of wetlands, from willing sellers, that contribute to the 
Upper Susquehanna River basin ecosystem.''.

SEC. 555. CHICKAMAUGA LOCK, CHATTANOOGA, TENNESSEE.

    (a) Transfer From TVA.--The Tennessee Valley Authority shall 
transfer $200,000 to the Secretary for the preparation of a report of 
the Chief of Engineers for a replacement lock at Chickamauga Lock and 
Dam, Chattanooga, Tennessee.
    (b) Report.--The Secretary shall accept and use the funds 
transferred under subsection (a) to prepare the report referred to in 
subsection (a).

SEC. 556. JOE POOL LAKE, TEXAS.

    If the city of Grand Prairie, Texas, enters into a binding 
agreement with the Secretary under which--
            (1) the city agrees to assume all of the responsibilities 
        (other than financial responsibilities) of the Trinity River 
        Authority of Texas under Corps of Engineers contract #DACW63-
        76-C-0166, including operation and maintenance of the 
        recreation facilities included in the contract; and
            (2) to pay the Federal Government a total of $4,290,000 in 
        2 installments, 1 in the amount of $2,150,000, which shall be 
        due and payable no later than December 1, 2000, and 1 in the 
        amount of $2,140,000, which shall be due and payable no later 
        than December 1, 2003,
the Trinity River Authority shall be relieved of all of its financial 
responsibilities under the contract as of the date the Secretary enters 
into the agreement with the city.

SEC. 557. BENSON BEACH, FORT CANBY STATE PARK, WASHINGTON.

    The Secretary shall place dredged material at Benson Beach, Fort 
Canby State Park, Washington, in accordance with section 204 of the 
Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (33 U.S.C. 2326).

SEC. 558. PUGET SOUND AND ADJACENT WATERS RESTORATION, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may participate in critical 
restoration projects in the area of the Puget Sound and its adjacent 
waters, including the watersheds that drain directly into Puget Sound, 
Admiralty Inlet, Hood Canal, Rosario Strait, and the eastern portion of 
the Strait of Juan de Fuca.
    (b) Project Selection.--The Secretary, in consultation with 
appropriate Federal, tribal, State, and local agencies, (including the 
Salmon Recovery Funding Board, Northwest Straits Commission, Hood Canal 
Coordinating Council, county watershed planning councils, and salmon 
enhancement groups) may identify critical restoration projects and may 
implement those projects after entering into an agreement with an 
appropriate non-Federal interest in accordance with the requirements of 
section 221 of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b) and 
this section.
    (c) Project Cost Limitation.--Of amounts appropriated to carry out 
this section, not more than $2,500,000 may be allocated to carry out 
any project.
    (d) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal interest for a critical 
        restoration project under this section shall--
                    (A) pay 35 percent of the cost of the project;
                    (B) provide any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
                relocations, and dredged material disposal areas 
                necessary for implementation of the project;
                    (C) pay 100 percent of the operation, maintenance, 
                repair, replacement, and rehabilitation costs 
                associated with the project; and
                    (D) hold the United States harmless from liability 
                due to implementation of the project, except for the 
                negligence of the Federal Government or its 
                contractors.
            (2) Credit.--The Secretary shall provide credit to the non-
        Federal interest for a critical restoration project under this 
        section for the value of any lands, easements, rights-of-way, 
        relocations, and dredged material disposal areas provided by 
        the non-Federal interest for the project.
            (3) Meeting non-federal cost share.--The non-Federal 
        interest may provide up to 50 percent of the non-Federal share 
        of the cost of a project under this section through the 
        provision of services, materials, supplies, or other in-kind 
        services.
    (e) Critical Restoration Project Defined.--In this section, the 
term ``critical restoration project'' means a water resource project 
that will produce, consistent with existing Federal programs, projects, 
and activities, immediate and substantial environmental protection and 
restoration benefits.
    (f) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $40,000,000.

SEC. 559. SHOALWATER BAY INDIAN TRIBE, WILLAPA BAY, WASHINGTON.

    (a) Placement of Dredged Material on Shore.--For the purpose of 
addressing coastal erosion, the Secretary shall place, on an emergency 
one-time basis, dredged material from a Federal navigation project on 
the shore of the tribal reservation of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe, 
Willapa Bay, Washington, at Federal expense.
    (b) Placement of Dredged Material on Protective Dunes.--The 
Secretary shall place dredged material from Willapa Bay on the 
remaining protective dunes on the tribal reservation of the Shoalwater 
Bay Indian Tribe, at Federal expense.
    (c) Study of Coastal Erosion.--The Secretary shall conduct a study 
to develop long-term solutions to coastal erosion problems at the 
tribal reservation of the Shoalwater Bay Indian Tribe at Federal 
expense.

SEC. 560. WYNOOCHEE LAKE, WYNOOCHEE RIVER, WASHINGTON.

    (a) In General.--The city of Aberdeen, Washington, may transfer its 
rights, interests, and title in the land transferred to the city under 
section 203 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 
4632) to the city of Tacoma, Washington.
    (b) Conditions.--The transfer under this section shall be subject 
to the conditions set forth in section 203(b) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4632); except that the condition set 
forth in paragraph (1) of such section shall apply to the city of 
Tacoma only for so long as the city of Tacoma has a valid license with 
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission relating to operation of the 
Wynoochee Dam, Washington.
    (c) Limitation.--The transfer under subsection (a) may be made only 
after the Secretary determines that the city of Tacoma will be able to 
operate, maintain, repair, replace, and rehabilitate the project for 
Wynoochee Lake, Wynoochee River, Washington, authorized by section 203 
of the Flood Control Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1193), in accordance with 
such regulations as the Secretary may issue to ensure that such 
operation, maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation is 
consistent with project purposes.
    (d) Water Supply Contract.--The water supply contract designated as 
DACWD 67-68-C-0024 shall be null and void if the Secretary exercises 
the reversionary right set forth in section 203(b)(3) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4632).

SEC. 561. SNOHOMISH RIVER, WASHINGTON.

    In coordination with appropriate Federal, tribal, and State 
agencies, the Secretary may carry out a project to address data needs 
regarding the outmigration of juvenile chinook salmon in the Snohomish 
River, Washington.

SEC. 562. BLUESTONE, WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Tri-Cities Power Authority of West Virginia is authorized to design and 
construct hydroelectric generating facilities at the Bluestone Lake 
facility, West Virginia, under the terms and conditions of the 
agreement referred to in subsection (b).
    (b) Agreement.--
            (1) Agreement terms.--Conditioned upon the parties agreeing 
        to mutually acceptable terms and conditions, the Secretary and 
        the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Southeastern Power 
        Administration, may enter into a binding agreement with the 
        Tri-Cities Power Authority under which the Tri-Cities Power 
        Authority agrees to each of the following:
                    (A) To design and construct the generating 
                facilities referred to in subsection (a) within 4 years 
                after the date of such agreement.
                    (B) To reimburse the Secretary for--
                            (i) the cost of approving such design and 
                        inspecting such construction;
                            (ii) the cost of providing any assistance 
                        authorized under subsection (c)(2); and
                            (iii) the redistributed costs associated 
                        with the original construction of the dam and 
                        dam safety if all parties agree with the method 
                        of the development of the chargeable amounts 
                        associated with hydropower at the facility.
                    (C) To release and indemnify the United States from 
                any claims, causes of action, or liabilities which may 
                arise from such design and construction of the 
                facilities referred to in subsection (a), including any 
                liability that may arise out of the removal of the 
                facility if directed by the Secretary.
            (2) Additional terms.--The agreement shall also specify 
        each of the following:
                    (A) The procedures and requirements for approval 
                and acceptance of design, construction, and operation 
                and maintenance of the facilities referred in 
                subsection (a).
                    (B) The rights, responsibilities, and liabilities 
                of each party to the agreement.
                    (C) The amount of the payments under subsection (f) 
                of this section and the procedures under which such 
                payments are to be made.
    (c) Other Requirements.--
            (1) Prohibition.--No Federal funds may be expended for the 
        design, construction, and operation and maintenance of the 
        facilities referred to in subsection (a) prior to the date on 
        which such facilities are accepted by the Secretary under 
        subsection (d).
            (2) Reimbursement.--Notwithstanding any other provision of 
        law, if requested by the Tri-Cities Power Authority, the 
        Secretary may provide, on a reimbursable basis, assistance in 
        connection with the design and construction of the generating 
        facilities referred to in subsection (a).
    (d) Completion of Construction.--
            (1) Transfer of facilities.--Notwithstanding any other 
        provision of law, upon completion of the construction of the 
        facilities referred to in subsection (a) and final approval of 
        such facility by the Secretary, the Tri-Cities Power Authority 
        shall transfer without consideration title to such facilities 
        to the United States, and the Secretary shall--
                    (A) accept the transfer of title to such facilities 
                on behalf of the United States; and
                    (B) operate and maintain the facilities referred to 
                in subsection (a).
            (2) Certification.--The Secretary is authorized to accept 
        title to the facilities pursuant to paragraph (1) only after 
        certifying that the quality of the construction meets all 
        standards established for similar facilities constructed by the 
        Secretary.
            (3) Authorized project purposes.--The operation and 
        maintenance of the facilities shall be conducted in a manner 
        that is consistent with other authorized project purposes of 
        the Bluestone Lake facility.
    (e) Excess Power.--Pursuant to any agreement under subsection (b), 
the Southeastern Power Administration shall market the excess power 
produced by the facilities referred to in subsection (a) in accordance 
with section 5 of the Rivers and Harbors Act of December 22, 1944 (16 
U.S.C. 825s; 58 Stat. 890).
    (f) Payments.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Secretary of Energy, acting through the Southeastern Power 
Administration, is authorized to pay in accordance with the terms of 
the agreement entered into under subsection (b) out of the revenues 
from the sale of power produced by the generating facility of the 
interconnected systems of reservoirs operated by the Secretary and 
marketed by the Southeastern Power Administration--
            (1) to the Tri-Cities Power Authority all reasonable costs 
        incurred by the Tri-Cities Power Authority in the design and 
        construction of the facilities referred to in subsection (a), 
        including the capital investment in such facilities and a 
        reasonable rate of return on such capital investment; and
            (2) to the Secretary, in accordance with the terms of the 
        agreement entered into under subsection (b) out of the revenues 
        from the sale of power produced by the generating facility of 
        the interconnected systems of reservoirs operated by the 
        Secretary and marketed by the Southeastern Power 
        Administration, all reasonable costs incurred by the Secretary 
        in the operation and maintenance of facilities referred to in 
        subsection (a).
    (g) Authority of Secretary of Energy.--Notwithstanding any other 
provision of law, the Secretary of Energy, acting through the 
Southeastern Power Administration, is authorized--
            (1) to construct such transmission facilities as necessary 
        to market the power produced at the facilities referred to in 
        subsection (a) with funds contributed by the Tri-Cities Power 
        Authority; and
            (2) to repay those funds, including interest and any 
        administrative expenses, directly from the revenues from the 
        sale of power produced by such facilities of the interconnected 
        systems of reservoirs operated by the Secretary and marketed by 
        the Southeastern Power Administration.
    (h) Savings Clause.--Nothing in this section affects any 
requirement under Federal or State environmental law relating to the 
licensing or operation of such facilities.

SEC. 563. LESAGE/GREENBOTTOM SWAMP, WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 30 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1988 (102 
Stat. 4030) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(d) Historic Structure.--The Secretary shall ensure the 
preservation and restoration of the structure known as the Jenkins 
House located within the Lesage/Greenbottom Swamp in accordance with 
standards for sites listed on the National Register of Historic 
Places.''.

SEC. 564. TUG FORK RIVER, WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide planning, design, and 
construction assistance to non-Federal interests for projects located 
along the Tug Fork River in West Virginia and identified by the master 
plan developed pursuant to section 114(t) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4820).
    (b) Priorities.--In providing assistance under this section, the 
Secretary shall give priority to the primary development demonstration 
sites in West Virginia identified by the master plan referred to in 
subsection (a).
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $1,000,000.

SEC. 565. VIRGINIA POINT RIVERFRONT PARK, WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary may provide planning, design, and 
construction assistance to non-Federal interests for the project at 
Virginia Point, located at the confluence of the Ohio and Big Sandy 
Rivers in West Virginia, identified by the preferred plan set forth in 
the feasibility study dated September 1999, and carried out under the 
West Virginia-Ohio River Comprehensive Study authorized by a resolution 
dated September 8, 1988, by the Committee on Public Works and 
Transportation of the House of Representatives.
    (b) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $3,100,000.

SEC. 566. SOUTHERN WEST VIRGINIA.

    Section 340(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4856) is amended by inserting ``environmental restoration,'' 
after ``distribution facilities,''.

SEC. 567. FOX RIVER SYSTEM, WISCONSIN.

    Section 332(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4852) is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Such terms 
and conditions may include a payment or payments to the State of 
Wisconsin to be used toward the repair and rehabilitation of the locks 
and appurtenant features to be transferred.''.

SEC. 568. SURFSIDE/SUNSET AND NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA.

    The Secretary shall treat the Surfside/Sunset Newport Beach element 
of the project for beach erosion, Orange County, California, authorized 
by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 1962 (76 Stat. 1177), as 
continuing construction.

SEC. 569. ILLINOIS RIVER BASIN RESTORATION.

    (a) Illinois River Basin Defined.--In this section, the term 
``Illinois River basin'' means the Illinois River, Illinois, its 
backwaters, side channels, and all tributaries, including their 
watersheds, draining into the Illinois River.
    (b) Comprehensive Plan.--
            (1) Development.--The Secretary shall develop, as 
        expeditiously as practicable, a proposed comprehensive plan for 
        the purpose of restoring, preserving, and protecting the 
        Illinois River basin.
            (2) Technologies and innovative approaches.--The 
        comprehensive plan shall provide for the development of new 
        technologies and innovative approaches--
                    (A) to enhance the Illinois River as a vital 
                transportation corridor;
                    (B) to improve water quality within the entire 
                Illinois River basin;
                    (C) to restore, enhance, and preserve habitat for 
                plants and wildlife; and
                    (D) to increase economic opportunity for 
                agriculture and business communities.
            (3) Specific components.--The comprehensive plan shall 
        include such features as are necessary to provide for--
                    (A) the development and implementation of a program 
                for sediment removal technology, sediment 
                characterization, sediment transport, and beneficial 
                uses of sediment;
                    (B) the development and implementation of a program 
                for the planning, conservation, evaluation, and 
                construction of measures for fish and wildlife habitat 
                conservation and rehabilitation, and stabilization and 
                enhancement of land and water resources in the basin;
                    (C) the development and implementation of a long-
                term resource monitoring program; and
                    (D) the development and implementation of a 
                computerized inventory and analysis system.
            (4) Consultation.--The comprehensive plan shall be 
        developed by the Secretary in consultation with appropriate 
        Federal agencies, the State of Illinois, and the Illinois River 
        Coordinating Council.
            (5) Report to congress.--Not later than 2 years after the 
        date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit to 
        Congress a report containing the comprehensive plan.
            (6) Additional studies and analyses.--After transmission of 
        a report under paragraph (5), the Secretary shall continue to 
        conduct such studies and analyses related to the comprehensive 
        plan as are necessary, consistent with this subsection.
    (c) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--If the Secretary, in cooperation with 
        appropriate Federal agencies and the State of Illinois, 
        determines that a restoration project for the Illinois River 
        basin will produce independent, immediate, and substantial 
        restoration, preservation, and protection benefits, the 
        Secretary shall proceed expeditiously with the implementation 
        of the project.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out projects under this subsection 
        $100,000,000 for fiscal years 2001 through 2004.
            (3) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        carrying out any project under this subsection shall not exceed 
        $5,000,000.
    (d) General Provisions.--
            (1) Water quality.--In carrying out projects and activities 
        under this section, the Secretary shall take into account the 
        protection of water quality by considering applicable State 
        water quality standards.
            (2) Public participation.--In developing the comprehensive 
        plan under subsection (b) and carrying out projects under 
        subsection (c), the Secretary shall implement procedures to 
        facilitate public participation, including providing advance 
        notice of meetings, providing adequate opportunity for public 
        input and comment, maintaining appropriate records, and making 
        a record of the proceedings of meetings available for public 
        inspection.
    (e) Coordination.--The Secretary shall integrate and coordinate 
projects and activities carried out under this section with ongoing 
Federal and State programs, projects, and activities, including the 
following:
            (1) Upper Mississippi River System-Environmental Management 
        Program authorized under section 1103 of the Water Resources 
        Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 652).
            (2) Upper Mississippi River Illinois Waterway System Study.
            (3) Kankakee River Basin General Investigation.
            (4) Peoria Riverfront Development General Investigation.
            (5) Illinois River Ecosystem Restoration General 
        Investigation.
            (6) Conservation Reserve Program and other farm programs of 
        the Department of Agriculture.
            (7) Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program (State) and 
        Conservation 2000, Ecosystem Program of the Illinois Department 
        of Natural Resources.
            (8) Conservation 2000 Conservation Practices Program and 
        the Livestock Management Facilities Act administered by the 
        Illinois Department of Agriculture.
            (9) National Buffer Initiative of the Natural Resources 
        Conservation Service.
            (10) Nonpoint source grant program administered by the 
        Illinois Environmental Protection Agency.
    (f) Justification.--
            (1) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the Flood 
        Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any other provision 
        of law, in carrying out activities to restore, preserve, and 
        protect the Illinois River basin under this section, the 
        Secretary may determine that the activities--
                    (A) are justified by the environmental benefits 
                derived by the Illinois River basin; and
                    (B) shall not need further economic justification 
                if the Secretary determines that the activities are 
                cost-effective.
            (2) Applicability.--Paragraph (1) shall not apply to any 
        separable element intended to produce benefits that are 
        predominantly unrelated to the restoration, preservation, and 
        protection of the Illinois River basin.
    (g) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) In general.--The non-Federal share of the cost of 
        projects and activities carried out under this section shall be 
        35 percent.
            (2) Operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and 
        replacement.--The operation, maintenance, rehabilitation, and 
        replacement of projects carried out under this section shall be 
        a non-Federal responsibility.
            (3) In-kind services.--The value of in-kind services 
        provided by the non-Federal interest for a project or activity 
        carried out under this section may be credited toward not more 
        than 80 percent of the non-Federal share of the cost of the 
        project or activity. In-kind services shall include all State 
        funds expended on programs and projects which accomplish the 
        goals of this section, as determined by the Secretary. Such 
        programs and projects may include the Illinois River 
        Conservation Reserve Program, the Illinois Conservation 2000 
        Program, the Open Lands Trust Fund, and other appropriate 
        programs carried out in the Illinois River basin.
            (4) Credit.--
                    (A) Value of lands.--If the Secretary determines 
                that lands or interests in land acquired by a non-
                Federal interest, regardless of the date of 
                acquisition, are integral to a project or activity 
                carried out under this section, the Secretary may 
                credit the value of the lands or interests in land 
                toward the non-Federal share of the cost of the project 
                or activity. Such value shall be determined by the 
                Secretary.
                    (B) Work.--If the Secretary determines that any 
                work completed by a non-Federal interest, regardless of 
                the date of completion, is integral to a project or 
                activity carried out under this section, the Secretary 
                may credit the value of the work toward the non-Federal 
                share of the cost of the project or activity. Such 
                value shall be determined by the Secretary.

SEC. 570. GREAT LAKES.

    (a) Great Lakes Tributary Model.--Section 516 of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (33 U.S.C. 2326b) is amended--
            (1) by adding at the end of subsection (e) the following:
            ``(3) Report.--Not later than December 31, 2003, the 
        Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on the 
        Secretary's activities under this subsection.''; and
            (2) in subsection (g)--
                    (A) by striking ``There is authorized'' and 
                inserting the following:
            ``(1) In general.--There is authorized'';
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Great lakes tributary model.--In addition to amounts 
        made available under paragraph (1), there is authorized to be 
        appropriated to carry out subsection (e) $5,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 2002 through 2006.''; and
                    (C) by aligning the remainder of the text of 
                paragraph (1) (as designated by subparagraph (A) of 
                this paragraph) with paragraph (2) (as added by 
                subparagraph (B) of this paragraph).
    (b) Alternative Engineering Technologies.--
            (1) Development of plan.--The Secretary shall develop and 
        transmit to Congress a plan to enhance the application of 
        ecological principles and practices to traditional engineering 
        problems at Great Lakes shores.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $200,000. 
        Activities under this subsection shall be carried out at 
        Federal expense.
    (c) Fisheries and Ecosystem Restoration.--
            (1) Development of plan.--The Secretary shall develop and 
        transmit to Congress a plan for implementing Corps of Engineers 
        activities, including ecosystem restoration, to enhance the 
        management of Great Lakes fisheries.
            (2) Authorization of appropriations.--There is authorized 
        to be appropriated to carry out this subsection $300,000. 
        Activities under this subsection shall be carried out at 
        Federal expense.

SEC. 571. GREAT LAKES REMEDIAL ACTION PLANS AND SEDIMENT REMEDIATION.

    Section 401 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (33 
U.S.C. 1268 note; 110 Stat. 3763; 113 Stat. 338) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(2)(A) by striking ``50 percent'' and 
        inserting ``35 percent'';
            (2) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) by striking paragraph (3);
                    (B) in the first sentence of paragraph (4) by 
                striking ``50 percent'' and inserting ``35 percent''; 
                and
                    (C) by redesignating paragraph (4) as paragraph 
                (3); and
            (3) in subsection (c) by striking ``$5,000,000 for each of 
        fiscal years 1998 through 2000.'' and inserting ``$10,000,000 
        for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005.''.

SEC. 572. GREAT LAKES DREDGING LEVELS ADJUSTMENT.

    (a) Definition of Great Lake.--In this section, the term ``Great 
Lake'' means Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron (including Lake 
St. Clair), Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario (including the St. Lawrence 
River to the 45th parallel of latitude).
    (b) Dredging Levels.--In operating and maintaining Federal channels 
and harbors of, and the connecting channels between, the Great Lakes, 
the Secretary shall conduct such dredging as is necessary to ensure 
minimal operation depths consistent with the original authorized depths 
of the channels and harbors when water levels in the Great Lakes are, 
or are forecast to be, below the International Great Lakes Datum of 
1985.

SEC. 573. DREDGED MATERIAL RECYCLING.

    (a) Pilot Program.--The Secretary shall conduct a pilot program to 
provide incentives for the removal of dredged material from a confined 
disposal facility associated with a harbor on the Great Lakes or the 
Saint Lawrence River and a harbor on the Delaware River in Pennsylvania 
for the purpose of recycling the dredged material and extending the 
life of the confined disposal facility.
    (b) Report.--Not later than 90 days after the date of completion of 
the pilot program, the Secretary shall transmit to Congress a report on 
the results of the program.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $2,000,000.

SEC. 574. WATERSHED MANAGEMENT, RESTORATION, AND DEVELOPMENT.

    Section 503(d) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3756-3757; 113 Stat. 288) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(28) Tomales Bay watershed, California.
            ``(29) Kaskaskia River watershed, Illinois.
            ``(30) Sangamon River watershed, Illinois.
            ``(31) Lackawanna River watershed, Pennsylvania.
            ``(32) Upper Charles River watershed, Massachusetts.
            ``(33) Brazos River watershed, Texas.''.

SEC. 575. MAINTENANCE OF NAVIGATION CHANNELS.

    Section 509(a) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
Stat. 3759; 113 Stat. 339) is amended by adding at the end the 
following:
            ``(16) Cameron Loop, Louisiana, as part of the Calcasieu 
        River and Pass Ship Channel.
            ``(17) Morehead City Harbor, North Carolina.''.

SEC. 576. SUPPORT OF ARMY CIVIL WORKS PROGRAM.

    The requirements of section 2361 of title 10, United States Code, 
shall not apply to any contract, cooperative research and development 
agreement, cooperative agreement, or grant entered into under section 
229 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3703) 
between the Secretary and Marshall University or entered into under 
section 350 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
310) between the Secretary and Juniata College.

SEC. 577. NATIONAL RECREATION RESERVATION SERVICE.

    Notwithstanding section 611 of the Treasury and General Government 
Appropriations Act, 1999 (112 Stat. 2861-515), the Secretary may 
participate in the National Recreation Reservation Service on an 
interagency basis and fund the Department of the Army's share of the 
cost of activities required for implementing, operating, and 
maintaining the Service.

SEC. 578. HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEY.

    The Secretary shall enter into an agreement with the Administrator 
of the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration to require 
the Secretary, not later than 60 days after the Corps of Engineers 
completes a project involving dredging of a channel, to provide data to 
the Administration in a standard digital format on the results of a 
hydrographic survey of the channel conducted by the Corps of Engineers.

SEC. 579. PERCHLORATE.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary, in cooperation with Federal, State, 
and local government agencies, may participate in studies and other 
investigative activities and in the planning and design of projects 
determined by the Secretary to offer a long-term solution to the 
problem of groundwater contamination caused by perchlorates.
    (b) Investigations and Projects.--
            (1) Bosque and leon rivers.--The Secretary, in coordination 
        with other Federal agencies and the Brazos River Authority, 
        shall participate under subsection (a) in investigations and 
        projects in the Bosque and Leon River watersheds in Texas to 
        assess the impact of the perchlorate associated with the former 
        Naval ``Weapons Industrial Reserve Plant'' at McGregor, Texas.
            (2) Caddo lake.--The Secretary, in coordination with other 
        Federal agencies and the Northeast Texas Municipal Water 
        District, shall participate under subsection (a) in 
        investigations and projects relating to perchlorate 
        contamination in Caddo Lake, Texas.
            (3) Eastern santa clara basin.--The Secretary, in 
        coordination with other Federal, State, and local government 
        agencies, shall participate under subsection (a) in 
        investigations and projects related to sites that are sources 
        of perchlorates and that are located in the city of Santa 
        Clarita, California.
    (c) Authorization of Appropriations.--For the purposes of carrying 
out this section, there is authorized to be appropriated to the 
Secretary $25,000,000, of which not to exceed $8,000,000 shall be 
available to carry out subsection (b)(1), not to exceed $3,000,000 
shall be available to carry out subsection (b)(2), and not to exceed 
$7,000,000 shall be available to carry out subsection (b)(3).

SEC. 580. ABANDONED AND INACTIVE NONCOAL MINE RESTORATION.

    Section 560 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (33 USC 
2336; 113 Stat. 354-355) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a) by striking ``and design'' and 
        inserting ``design, and construction'';
            (2) in subsection (c) by striking ``50'' and inserting 
        ``35'';
            (3) in subsection (e) by inserting ``and colleges and 
        universities, including the members of the Western Universities 
        Mine-Land Reclamation and Restoration Consortium, for the 
        purposes of assisting in the reclamation of abandoned noncoal 
        mines and'' after ``entities''; and
            (4) by striking subsection (f) and inserting the following:
    ``(f) Non-Federal Interests.--In this section, the term `non-
Federal interests' includes, with the consent of the affected local 
government, nonprofit entities, notwithstanding section 221 of the 
Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
    ``(g) Operation and Maintenance.--The non-Federal share of the 
costs of operation and maintenance for a project carried out under this 
section shall be 100 percent.
    ``(h) Credit.--A non-Federal interest shall receive credit toward 
the non-Federal share of the cost of a project under this section for 
design and construction services and other in-kind consideration 
provided by the non-Federal interest if the Secretary determines that 
such design and construction services and other in-kind consideration 
are integral to the project.
    ``(i) Cost Limitation.--Not more than $10,000,000 of the amounts 
appropriated to carry out this section may be allotted for projects in 
a single locality, but the Secretary may accept funds voluntarily 
contributed by a non-Federal or Federal entity for the purpose of 
expanding the scope of the services requested by the non-Federal or 
Federal entity.
    ``(j) No Effect on Liability.--The provision of assistance under 
this section shall not relieve from liability any person that would 
otherwise be liable under Federal or State law for damages, response 
costs, natural resource damages, restitution, equitable relief, or any 
other relief.
    ``(k) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section $45,000,000. Such sums shall 
remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 581. LAKES PROGRAM.

    Section 602 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (100 
Stat. 4148-4149) is further amended--
            (1) in subsection (b) by inserting ``and activity'' after 
        ``project'';
            (2) in subsection (c) by inserting ``and activities under 
        subsection (f)'' before the comma; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Center for Lake Education and Research, Otsego Lake, New 
York.--
            ``(1) In general.--The Secretary shall construct an 
        environmental education and research facility at Otsego Lake, 
        New York. The purpose of the Center shall be to--
                    ``(A) conduct nationwide research on the impacts of 
                water quality and water quantity on lake hydrology and 
                the hydrologic cycle;
                    ``(B) develop technologies and strategies for 
                monitoring and improving water quality in the Nation's 
                lakes; and
                    ``(C) provide public education regarding the 
                biological, economic, recreational, and aesthetic value 
                of the Nation's lakes.
            ``(2) Use of research.--The results of research and 
        education activities carried out at the Center shall be applied 
        to the program under subsection (a) and to other Federal 
        programs, projects, and activities that are intended to improve 
        or otherwise affect lakes.
            ``(3) Biological monitoring station.--A central function of 
        the Center shall be to research, develop, test, and evaluate 
        biological monitoring technologies and techniques for potential 
        use at lakes listed in subsection (a) and throughout the 
        Nation.
            ``(4) Credit.--The non-Federal sponsor shall receive credit 
        for lands, easements, rights-of-way, and relocations toward its 
        share of project costs.
            ``(5) Authorization of appropriations.--In addition to sums 
        authorized by subsection (d), there is authorized to be 
        appropriated to carry out this subsection $6,000,000. Such sums 
        shall remain available until expended.''.

SEC. 582. RELEASE OF USE RESTRICTION.

    (a) Release.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the 
Tennessee Valley Authority shall grant a release or releases, without 
monetary consideration, from the restriction covenant which requires 
that property described in subsection (b) shall at all times be used 
solely for the purpose of erecting docks and buildings for shipbuilding 
purposes or for the manufacture or storage of products for the purpose 
of trading or shipping in transportation.
    (b) Description of Property.--This section shall apply only to 
those lands situated in the city of Decatur, Morgan County, Alabama, 
and running along the easterly boundary of a tract of land described in 
an indenture conveying such lands to the Ingalls Shipbuilding 
Corporation dated July 29, 1954, and recorded in deed book 535 at page 
6 in the office of the Probate Judge of Morgan County, Alabama, which 
are owned or may hereafter be acquired by the Alabama Farmers 
Cooperative, Inc.

SEC. 583. COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES PROTECTION.

    (a) In General.--Under section 219(a) of the Water Resources 
Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835), the Secretary may provide 
technical, planning, and design assistance to non-Federal interests to 
carry out water-related projects described in this section.
    (b) Non-Federal Share.--Notwithstanding section 219(b) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835), the non-Federal 
share of the cost of each project assisted in accordance with this 
section shall be 25 percent.
    (c) Project Descriptions.--The Secretary may provide assistance in 
accordance with subsection (a) to each of the following projects:
            (1)  Marana, arizona.--Wastewater treatment and 
        distribution infrastructure, Marana, Arizona.
            (2) Eastern arkansas enterprise community, arkansas.--
        Water-related infrastructure, Eastern Arkansas Enterprise 
        Community, Cross, Lee, Monroe, and St. Francis Counties, 
        Arkansas.
            (3) Chino hills, california.--Storm water and sewage 
        collection infrastructure, Chino Hills, California.
            (4) Clear lake basin, california.--Water-related 
        infrastructure and resource protection, Clear Lake Basin, 
        California.
            (5) Desert hot springs, california.--Resource protection 
        and wastewater infrastructure, Desert Hot Springs, California.
            (6) Eastern municipal water district, california.--Regional 
        water-related infrastructure, Eastern Municipal Water District, 
        California.
            (7) Huntington beach, california.--Water supply and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Huntington Beach, California.
            (8) Inglewood, california.--Water infrastructure, 
        Inglewood, California.
            (9) Los osos community service district, california.--
        Wastewater infrastructure, Los Osos Community Service District, 
        California.
            (10) Norwalk, california.--Water-related infrastructure, 
        Norwalk, California.
            (11) Key biscayne, florida.--Sanitary sewer infrastructure, 
        Key Biscayne, Florida.
            (12) South tampa, florida.--Water supply and aquifer 
        storage and recovery infrastructure, South Tampa, Florida.
            (13) Fort wayne, indiana.--Combined sewer overflow 
        infrastructure and wetlands protection, Fort Wayne, Indiana.
            (14) Indianapolis, indiana.--Combined sewer overflow 
        infrastructure, Indianapolis, Indiana.
            (15) St. charles, st. bernard, and plaquemines parishes, 
        louisiana.--Water and wastewater infrastructure, St. Charles, 
        St. Bernard, and Plaquemines Parishes, Louisiana.
            (16) St. john the baptist and st. james parishes, 
        louisiana.--Water and sewer improvements, St. John the Baptist 
        and St. James Parishes, Louisiana.
            (17) Union county, north carolina.--Water infrastructure, 
        Union County, North Carolina.
            (18) Hood river, oregon.--Water transmission 
        infrastructure, Hood River, Oregon.
            (19) Medford, oregon.--Sewer collection infrastructure, 
        Medford, Oregon.
            (20) Portland, oregon.--Water infrastructure and resource 
        protection, Portland, Oregon.
            (21) Coudersport, pennsylvania.--Sewer system extensions 
        and improvements, Coudersport, Pennsylvania.
            (22) Park city, utah.--Water supply infrastructure, Park 
        City, Utah.
    (d) Authorization of Appropriations.--
            (1) In general.--There is authorized to be appropriated 
        $25,000,000 for providing assistance in accordance with 
        subsection (a) to the projects described in subsection (c).
            (2) Availability.--Sums authorized to be appropriated under 
        this subsection shall remain available until expended.
    (e) Additional Assistance for Critical Resource Projects.--The 
Secretary may provide assistance in accordance with subsection (a) and 
assistance for construction for each the following projects:
            (1) Duck river, cullman, alabama.--$5,000,000 for water 
        supply infrastructure, Duck River, Cullman, Alabama.
            (2) Union county, arkansas.--$52,000,000 for water supply 
        infrastructure, including facilities for withdrawal, treatment, 
        and distribution, Union County, Arkansas.
            (3) Cambria, california.--$10,300,000 for desalination 
        infrastructure, Cambria, California.
            (4) Los angeles harbor/terminal island, california.--
        $6,500,000 for wastewater recycling infrastructure, Los Angeles 
        Harbor/Terminal Island, California.
            (5) North valley region, lancaster, california.--
        $14,500,000 for water infrastructure, North Valley Region, 
        Lancaster, California.
            (6) San diego county, california.--$10,000,000 for water-
        related infrastructure, San Diego County, California.
            (7) South perris, california.--$25,000,000 for water supply 
        desalination infrastructure, South Perris, California.
            (8) Aurora, illinois.--$8,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure to reduce or eliminate combined sewer overflows, 
        Aurora, Illinois.
            (9) Cook county, illinois.--$35,000,000 for water-related 
        infrastructure and resource protection and development, Cook 
        County, Illinois.
            (10) Madison and st. clair counties, illinois.--$10,000,000 
        for water and wastewater assistance, Madison and St. Clair 
        Counties, Illinois.
            (11) Iberia parish, louisiana.--$5,000,000 for water and 
        wastewater infrastructure, Iberia Parish, Louisiana.
            (12) Kenner, louisiana.--$5,000,000 for wastewater 
        infrastructure, Kenner, Louisiana.
            (13) Garrison and kathio township, minnesota.--$11,000,000 
        for a wastewater infrastructure project for the city of 
        Garrison and Kathio Township, Minnesota.
            (14) Newton, new jersey.--$7,000,000 for water filtration 
        infrastructure, Newton, New Jersey.
            (15) Liverpool, new york.--$2,000,000 for water 
        infrastructure, including a pump station, Liverpool, New York.
            (16) Stanly county, north carolina.--$8,900,000 for 
        wastewater infrastructure, Stanly County, North Carolina.
            (17) Yukon, oklahoma.--$5,500,000 for water-related 
        infrastructure, including wells, booster stations, storage 
        tanks, and transmission lines, Yukon, Oklahoma.
            (18) Allegheny county, pennsylvania.--$20,000,000 for 
        water-related environmental infrastructure, Allegheny County, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (19) Mount joy township and conewago township, 
        pennsylvania.--$8,300,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Mount Joy Township and Conewago Township, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (20) Phoenixville borough, chester county, pennsylvania.--
        $2,400,000 for water and sewer infrastructure, Phoenixville 
        Borough, Chester County, Pennsylvania.
            (21) Titusville, pennsylvania.--$7,300,000 for storm water 
        separation and treatment plant upgrades, Titusville, 
        Pennsylvania.
            (22) Washington, greene, westmoreland, and fayette 
        counties, pennsylvania.--$8,000,000 for water and wastewater 
        infrastructure, Washington, Greene, Westmoreland, and Fayette 
        Counties, Pennsylvania.

SEC. 584. MODIFICATION OF AUTHORIZATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS.

    Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 
Stat. 4835, 4836) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (e)(6) by striking ``$20,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$30,000,000'';
            (2) in subsection (f)(4) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$35,000,000'';
            (3) in subsection (f)(21) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000'';
            (4) in subsection (f)(25) by striking ``$5,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$15,000,000'';
            (5) in subsection (f)(30) by striking ``$10,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$20,000,000'';
            (6) in subsection (f)(43) by striking ``$15,000,000'' and 
        inserting ``$35,000,000''; and
            (7) in subsection (f) by adding at the end the following 
        new paragraph:
            ``(44) Washington, d.c., and maryland.--$15,000,000 for the 
        project described in subsection (c)(1), modified to include 
        measures to eliminate or control combined sewer overflows in 
        the Anacostia River watershed.''.

SEC. 585. LAND CONVEYANCES.

    (a) Thompson, Connecticut.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
        deed without consideration to the town of Thompson, 
        Connecticut, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to the approximately 1.36-acre parcel of land 
        described in paragraph (2) for public ownership and use by the 
        town for fire fighting and related emergency services purposes.
            (2) Land description.--The parcel of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) is in the town of Thompson, county of Windham, 
        State of Connecticut, on the northerly side of West Thompson 
        Road owned by the United States and shown as Parcel A on a plan 
        by Provost, Rovero, Fitzback entitled ``Property Survey 
        Prepared for West Thompson Independent Firemen Association #1'' 
        dated August 24, 1998, bounded and described as follows:
                    Beginning at a bound labeled WT-276 on the 
                northerly side line of West Thompson Road, so called, 
                at the most south corner of the Parcel herein described 
                and at land now or formerly of West Thompson 
                Independent Firemen Association No. 1;
                    Thence in a generally westerly direction by said 
                northerly side line of West Thompson Road, by a curve 
                to the left, having a radius of 640.00 feet a distance 
                of 169.30 feet to a point;
                    Thence North 13 degrees, 08 minutes, 37 seconds 
                East by the side line of said West Thompson Road a 
                distance of 10.00 feet to a point;
                    Thence in a generally westerly direction by the 
                northerly side line of said West Thompson Road, by a 
                curve to the left having a radius of 650.00 feet a 
                distance of 109.88 feet to a bound labeled WT-123, at 
                land now or formerly of the United States of America;
                    Thence North 44 degrees, 43 minutes, 07 seconds 
                East by said land now or formerly of the United States 
                of America a distance of 185.00 feet to a point;
                    Thence North 67 degrees, 34 minutes, 13 seconds 
                East by said land now or formerly of the United States 
                of America a distance of 200.19 feet to a point in a 
                stonewall;
                    Thence South 20 degrees, 49 minutes, 17 seconds 
                East by a stonewall and by said land now or formerly of 
                the United States of America a distance of 253.10 feet 
                to a point at land now or formerly of West Thompson 
                Independent Firemen Association No. 1;
                    Thence North 57 degrees, 45 minutes, 25 seconds 
                West by land now or formerly of said West Thompson 
                Independent Firemen Association No. 1 a distance of 
                89.04 feet to a bound labeled WT-277;
                    Thence South 32 degrees, 14 minutes, 35 seconds 
                West by land now or formerly of said West Thompson 
                Independent Firemen Association No. 1 a distance of 
                123.06 feet to the point of beginning.
            (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the parcel 
        described in paragraph (2) ceases to be held in public 
        ownership or used for fire fighting and related emergency 
        services, all right, title, and interest in and to the parcel 
        shall revert to the United States.
    (b) Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Lucy 
        Webb Hayes National Training School for Deaconesses and 
        Missionaries Conducting Sibley Memorial Hospital (in this 
        subsection referred to as the ``Hospital'') by quitclaim deed 
        under the terms of a negotiated sale, all right, title, and 
        interest of the United States in and to the 8.864-acre parcel 
        of land described in paragraph (2) for medical care and parking 
        purposes. The consideration paid under such negotiated sale 
        shall reflect the value of the parcel, taking into 
        consideration the terms and conditions of the conveyance 
        imposed under this subsection.
            (2) Land description.--The parcel of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) is the parcel described as follows: Beginning at 
        a point on the westerly right-of-way line of Dalecarlia 
        Parkway, said point also being on the southerly division line 
        of part of Square N1448, A&T Lot 801 as recorded in A&T 2387 
        and part of the property of the United States Government, 
        thence with said southerly division line now described:
                    (A) North 35 deg. 05' 40'' West--436.31 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (B) South 89 deg. 59' 30'' West--550 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (C) South 53 deg. 48' 00'' West--361.08 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (D) South 89 deg. 59' 30'' West--466.76 feet to a 
                point at the southwesterly corner of the aforesaid A&T 
                Lot 801, said point also being on the easterly right-
                of-way line of MacArthur Boulevard, thence with a 
                portion of the westerly division line of said A&T Lot 
                801 and the easterly right-of-way line of MacArthur 
                Boulevard, as now described.
                    (E) 78.62 feet along the arc of a curve to the 
                right having a radius of 650.98 feet, chord bearing and 
                distance of North 06 deg. 17' 20'' West--78.57 feet to 
                a point, thence crossing to include a portion of 
                aforesaid A&T Lot 801 and a portion of the aforesaid 
                Dalecarlia Reservoir Grounds, as now described
                    (F) North 87 deg. 18' 21'' East--258.85 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (G) North 02 deg. 49' 16'' West--214.18 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (H) South 87 deg. 09' 00'' West--238.95 feet to a 
                point on the aforesaid easterly right-of-way line of 
                MacArthur Boulevard, thence with said easterly right-
                of-way line, as now described
                    (I) North 08 deg. 41' 30'' East--30.62 feet to a 
                point, thence crossing to include a portion of 
                aforesaid A&T Lot 801 and a portion of the aforesaid 
                Dalecarlia Reservoir Grounds, as now described
                    (J) North 87 deg. 09' 00'' East--373.96 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (K) North 88 deg. 42' 48'' East--374.92 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (L) North 56 deg. 53' 40'' East--53.16 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (M) North 86 deg. 00' 15'' East--26.17 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (N) South 87 deg. 24' 50'' East--464.01 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (O) North 83 deg. 34' 31'' East--212.62 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (P) South 30 deg. 16' 12'' East--108.97 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (Q) South 38 deg. 30' 23'' East--287.46 feet to a 
                point, thence
                    (R) South 09 deg. 03' 38'' West--92.74 feet to the 
                point on the aforesaid westerly right-of-way line of 
                Dalecarlia Parkway, thence with said westerly right-of-
                way line, as now described
                    (S) 197.74 feet along the arc of a curve to the 
                right having a radius of 916.00 feet, chord bearing and 
                distance of South 53 deg. 54' 43'' West--197.35 feet to 
                the place of beginning.
            (3) Terms and conditions.--The conveyance under this 
        subsection shall be subject to the following terms and 
        conditions:
                    (A) Limitation on the use of certain portions of 
                the parcel.--The Secretary shall include in any deed 
                conveying the parcel under this section a restriction 
                to prevent the Hospital, and its successors and 
                assigns, from constructing any structure, other than a 
                structure used exclusively for the parking of motor 
                vehicles, on the portion of the parcel that lies 
                between the Washington Aqueduct and Little Falls Road.
                    (B) Limitation on certain legal challenges.--The 
                Secretary shall require the Hospital, and its 
                successors and assigns, to refrain from raising any 
                legal challenge to the operations of the Washington 
                Aqueduct arising from any impact such operations may 
                have on the activities conducted by the Hospital on the 
                parcel.
                    (C) Easement.--The Secretary shall require that the 
                conveyance be subject to the retention of an easement 
                permitting the United States, and its successors and 
                assigns, to use and maintain the portion of the parcel 
                described as follows: Beginning at a point on the 
                easterly or South 35 deg. 05' 40'' East--436.31 foot 
                plat line of Lot 25 as shown on a subdivision plat 
                recorded in book 175 page 102 among the records of the 
                Office of the Surveyor of the District of Columbia, 
                said point also being on the northerly right-of-way 
                line of Dalecarlia Parkway, thence running with said 
                easterly line of Lot 25 and crossing to include a 
                portion of the aforsaid Dalecarlia Reservoir Grounds as 
                now described:
                            (i) North 35 deg. 05' 40'' West--495.13 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (ii) North 87 deg. 24' 50'' West--414.43 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (iii) South 81 deg. 08' 00'' West--69.56 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (iv) South 88 deg. 42' 48'' West--367.50 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (v) South 87 deg. 09' 00'' West--379.68 
                        feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way 
                        line of MacArthur Boulevard, thence with said 
                        easterly right-of-way line, as now described
                            (vi) North 08 deg. 41' 30'' East--30.62 
                        feet to a point, thence crossing to include a 
                        portion of the aforesaid Dalecarlia Reservoir 
                        Grounds, as now described
                            (vii) North 87 deg. 09' 00'' East--373.96 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (viii) North 88 deg. 42' 48'' East--374.92 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (ix) North 56 deg. 53' 40'' East--53.16 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (x) North 86 deg. 00' 15'' East--26.17 feet 
                        to a point, thence
                            (xi) South 87 deg. 24' 50'' East--464.01 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (xii) North 83 deg. 34' 31'' East--50.62 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (xiii) South 02 deg. 35' 10'' West--46.46 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (xiv) South 13 deg. 38' 12'' East--107.83 
                        feet to a point, thence
                            (xv) South 35 deg. 05' 40'' East--347.97 
                        feet to a point on the aforesaid northerly 
                        right-of-way line of Dalecarlia Parkway, thence 
                        with said right-of-way line, as now described
                            (xvi) 44.12 feet along the arc of a curve 
                        to the right having a radius of 855.00 feet, 
                        chord bearing and distance of South 58 deg. 59' 
                        22'' West--44.11 feet to the place of beginning 
                        containing 1.7157 acres of land more or less as 
                        now described by Maddox Engineers and 
                        Surveyors, Inc., June 2000, Job #00015.
            (4) Appraisal.--Before conveying any right, title, or 
        interest under this subsection, the Secretary shall obtain an 
        appraisal of the fair market value of the parcel.
    (c) Ontonagon, Michigan.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
        deed without consideration to the Ontonagon County Historical 
        Society all right, title, and interest of the United States in 
        and to the parcel of land underlying and immediately 
        surrounding the lighthouse at Ontonagon, Michigan, consisting 
        of approximately 1.8 acres, together with any improvements 
        thereon, for public ownership and for public purposes.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of the real property described in 
        paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the real 
        property described in paragraph (1) ceases to be held in public 
        ownership or used for public purposes, all right, title, and 
        interest in and to the property shall revert to the United 
        States.
    (d) Pike County, Missouri.--
            (1) Land exchange.--Subject to paragraphs (3) and (4), at 
        such time as S.S.S., Inc. conveys all right, title, and 
        interest in and to the parcel of land described in paragraph 
        (2)(A) to the United States, the Secretary shall convey by 
        quitclaim deed all right, title, and interest in the parcel of 
        land described in paragraph (2)(B) to S.S.S., Inc.
            (2) Land description.--The parcels of land referred to in 
        paragraph (1) are the following:
                    (A) Non-federal land.--8.99 acres with existing 
                flowage easements situated in Pike County, Missouri, 
                adjacent to land being acquired from Holnam, Inc. by 
                the Corps of Engineers.
                    (B) Federal land.--8.99 acres situated in Pike 
                County, Missouri, known as Government Tract Numbers FM-
                46 and FM-47, administered by the Corps of Engineers.
            (3) Conditions.--The exchange of land under paragraph (1) 
        shall be subject to the following conditions:
                    (A) Deeds.--
                            (i) Non-federal land.--The conveyance of 
                        the land described in paragraph (2)(A) to the 
                        Secretary shall be by a quitclaim deed 
                        acceptable to the Secretary.
                            (ii) Federal land.--The instrument of 
                        conveyance used to convey the land described in 
                        paragraph (2)(B) to S.S.S., Inc. shall contain 
                        such reservations, terms, and conditions as the 
                        Secretary considers necessary to allow the 
                        United States to operate and maintain the 
                        Mississippi River 9-Foot Navigation Project.
                    (B) Removal of improvements.--S.S.S., Inc. may 
                remove any improvements on the land described in 
                paragraph (2)(A). The Secretary may require S.S.S., 
                Inc. to remove any improvements on the land described 
                in paragraph (2)(A). In either case, S.S.S., Inc. shall 
                hold the United States harmless from liability, and the 
                United States shall not incur costs associated with the 
                removal or relocation of any of the improvements.
                    (C) Time limit for exchange.--The land exchange 
                under paragraph (1) shall be completed not later than 2 
                years after the date of enactment of this Act.
                    (D) Legal description.--The Secretary shall provide 
                the legal description of the lands described in 
                paragraph (2). The legal description shall be used in 
                the instruments of conveyance of the lands.
            (4) Value of properties.--If the appraised fair market 
        value, as determined by the Secretary, of the land conveyed to 
        S.S.S., Inc. by the Secretary under paragraph (1) exceeds the 
        appraised fair market value, as determined by the Secretary, of 
        the land conveyed to the United States by S.S.S., Inc. under 
        paragraph (1), S.S.S., Inc. shall make a payment equal to the 
        excess in cash or a cash equivalent to the United States.
    (e) Candy Lake Project, Osage County, Oklahoma.--Section 
563(c)(1)(B) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1999 (113 Stat. 
357) is amended by striking ``a deceased individual'' and inserting 
``an individual''.
    (f) Manor Township, Pennsylvania.--
            (1) In general.--In accordance with this subsection, the 
        Secretary shall convey by quitclaim deed to the township of 
        Manor, Pennsylvania, all right, title, and interest of the 
        United States in and to the approximately 113 acres of real 
        property located at Crooked Creek Lake, together with any 
        improvements on the land.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of the real property described in 
        paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) Consideration.--The Secretary may convey under this 
        subsection without consideration any portion of the real 
        property described in paragraph (1) if the portion is to be 
        retained in public ownership and be used for public park and 
        recreation or other public purposes.
            (4) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that any 
        portion of the property conveyed under paragraph (3) ceases to 
        be held in public ownership or to be used for public park and 
        recreation or other public purposes, all right, title, and 
        interest in and to such portion of property shall revert to the 
        Secretary.
            (5) Payment of costs.--The township of Manor, Pennsylvania 
        shall be responsible for all costs associated with a conveyance 
        under this subsection, including the cost of conducting the 
        survey referred to in paragraph (2).
    (g) New Savannah Bluff Lock and Dam, Savannah River, South 
Carolina, Below Augusta.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
        deed to the city of North Augusta and Aiken County, South 
        Carolina, the lock, dam, and appurtenant features at New 
        Savannah Bluff, including the adjacent approximately 50-acre 
        park and recreation area with improvements of the navigation 
        project, Savannah River Below Augusta, Georgia, authorized by 
        the first section of the River and Harbor Act of July 3, 1930 
        (46 Stat. 924), subject to the execution of an agreement by the 
        Secretary and the city of North Augusta and Aiken County, South 
        Carolina, that specifies the terms and conditions for such 
        conveyance.
            (2) Treatment of lock, dam, appurtenant features, and park 
        and recreation area.--The lock, dam, appurtenant features, 
        adjacent park and recreation area, and other project lands, to 
        be conveyed under paragraph (1) shall not be treated as part of 
        any Federal water resources project after the effective date of 
        the transfer.
            (3) Operation and maintenance.--Operation and maintenance 
        of all features of the navigation project, other than the lock, 
        dam, appurtenant features, adjacent park and recreation area, 
        and other project lands to be conveyed under paragraph (1), 
        shall continue to be a Federal responsibility after the 
        effective date of the transfer under paragraph (1).
    (h) Tri-Cities Area, Washington.--Section 501(i) of the Water 
Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 3752-3753) is amended--
            (1) by inserting before the period at the end of paragraph 
        (1) the following: ``; except that any of such local 
        governments, with the agreement of the appropriate district 
        engineer, may exempt from the conveyance to the local 
        government all or any part of the lands to be conveyed to the 
        local government''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end of paragraph 
        (2)(C) the following: ``; except that approximately 7.4 acres 
        in Columbia Park, Kennewick, Washington, consisting of the 
        historic site located in the Park and known and referred to as 
        the Kennewick Man Site and such adjacent wooded areas as the 
        Secretary determines are necessary to protect the historic 
        site, shall remain in Federal ownership''.
    (i) Bayou Teche, Louisiana.--
            (1) In general.--After renovations of the Keystone Lock 
        facility have been completed, the Secretary may convey by 
        quitclaim deed without consideration to St. Martin Parish, 
        Louisiana, all rights, interests, and title of the United 
        States in the approximately 12.03 acres of land under the 
        administrative jurisdiction of the Secretary in Bayou Teche, 
        Louisiana, together with improvements thereon. The dam and the 
        authority to retain upstream pool elevations shall remain under 
        the jurisdiction of the Secretary. The Secretary shall 
        relinquish all operations and maintenance of the lock to St. 
        Martin Parish.
            (2) Conditions.--The following conditions apply to the 
        transfer under paragraph (1):
                    (A) St. Martin Parish shall operate, maintain, 
                repair, replace, and rehabilitate the lock in 
                accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary 
                which are consistent with the project's authorized 
                purposes.
                    (B) The Parish shall provide the Secretary access 
                to the dam whenever the Secretary notifies the Parish 
                of a need for access to the dam.
                    (C) If the Parish fails to comply with subparagraph 
                (A), the Secretary shall notify the Parish of such 
                failure. If the parish does not correct such failure 
                during the 1-year period beginning on the date of such 
                notification, the Secretary shall have a right of 
                reverter to reclaim possession and title to the land 
                and improvements conveyed under this section or, in the 
                case of a failure to make necessary repairs, the 
                Secretary may effect the repairs and require payment 
                from the Parish for the repairs made by the Secretary.
    (j) Joliet, Illinois.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey by quitclaim 
        deed without consideration to the Joliet Park District in 
        Joliet, Illinois, all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to the parcel of real property located at 622 
        Railroad Street in the city of Joliet, consisting of 
        approximately 2 acres, together with any improvements thereon, 
        for public ownership and use as the site of the headquarters of 
        the park district.
            (2) Survey to obtain legal description.--The exact acreage 
        and the legal description of the real property described in 
        paragraph (1) shall be determined by a survey that is 
        satisfactory to the Secretary.
            (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership or to be used as headquarters of the park 
        district or for other purposes, all right, title, and interest 
        in and to such property shall revert to the United States.
    (k) Ottawa, Illinois.--
            (1) Conveyance of property.--Subject to the terms, 
        conditions, and reservations of paragraph (2), the Secretary 
        shall convey by quitclaim deed to the Young Men's Christian 
        Association of Ottawa, Illinois (in this subsection referred to 
        as the ``YMCA''), all right, title, and interest of the United 
        States in and to a portion of the easements acquired for the 
        improvement of the Illinois Waterway project over a parcel of 
        real property owned by the YMCA, known as the ``Ottawa, 
        Illinois YMCA Site'', and located at 201 E. Jackson Street, 
        Ottawa, La Salle County, Illinois (portion of NE \1/4\, S11, 
        T33N, R3E 3PM), except that portion lying below the elevation 
        of 461 feet National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
            (2) Conditions.--The following conditions apply to the 
        conveyance under paragraph (1):
                    (A) The exact acreage and the legal description of 
                the real property described in paragraph (1) shall be 
                determined by a survey that is satisfactory to the 
                Secretary.
                    (B) The YMCA shall agree to hold and save the 
                United States harmless from liability associated with 
                the operation and maintenance of the Illinois Waterway 
                project on the property desscribed in paragraph (1).
                    (C) If the Secretary determines that any portion of 
                the property that is the subject of the easement 
                conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be used as the 
                YMCA, all right, title, and interest in and to such 
                easement shall revert to the Secretary.
    (l) St. Clair and Benton Counties, Missouri.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary shall convey to the Iconium 
        Fire Protection District, St. Clair and Benton counties, 
        Missouri, by quitclaim deed and without consideration, all 
        right, title, and interest of the United States in and to the 
        parcel of land described in paragraph (2).
            (2) Land description.--The parcel of land to be conveyed 
        under paragraph (1) is the tract of land located in the 
        Southeast \1/4\ of Section 13, Township 39 North, Range 25 
        West, of the Fifth Principal Meridian, St. Clair County, 
        Missouri, more particularly described as follows: Commencing at 
        the Southwest corner of Section 18, as designated by Corps 
        survey marker AP 18-1, thence northerly 11.22 feet to the 
        southeast corner of Section 13, thence 657.22 feet north along 
        the east line of Section 13 to Corps monument 18 1-C lying 
        within the right-of-way of State Highway C, being the point of 
        beginning of the tract of land herein described; thence 
        westerly approximately 210 feet, thence northerly 150 feet, 
        thence easterly approximately 210 feet to the east line of 
        Section 13, thence southerly along said east line, 150 feet to 
        the point of beginning, containing 0.723 acres, more or less.
            (3) Reversion.--If the Secretary determines that the 
        property conveyed under paragraph (1) ceases to be held in 
        public ownership or to be used as a site for a fire station, 
        all right, title, and interest in and to such property shall 
        revert to the United States.
    (m) Generally Applicable Provisions.--
            (1) Applicability of property screening provisions.--
        Section 2696 of title 10, United States Code, shall not apply 
        to any conveyance under this section.
            (2) Additional terms and conditions.--The Secretary may 
        require that any conveyance under this section be subject to 
        such additional terms and conditions as the Secretary considers 
        appropriate and necessary to protect the interests of the 
        United States.
            (3) Costs of conveyance.--An entity to which a conveyance 
        is made under this section shall be responsible for all 
        reasonable and necessary costs, including real estate 
        transaction and environmental compliance costs, associated with 
        the conveyance.
            (4) Liability.--An entity to which a conveyance is made 
        under this section shall hold the United States harmless from 
        any liability with respect to activities carried out, on or 
        after the date of the conveyance, on the real property 
        conveyed. The United States shall remain responsible for any 
        liability with respect to activities carried out, before such 
        date, on the real property conveyed.

SEC. 586. BRUCE F. VENTO UNIT OF THE BOUNDARY WATERS CANOE AREA 
              WILDERNESS, MINNESOTA.

    (a) Designation.--The portion of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area 
Wilderness, Minnesota, situated north and cast of the Gunflint Corridor 
and that is bounded by the United States border with Canada to the 
north shall be known and designated as the ``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the 
Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness''.
    (b) Legal Reference.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the area 
referred to in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to the 
``Bruce F. Vento Unit of the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness''.

SEC. 587. WAURIKA LAKE, OKLAHOMA.

    The remaining obligation of the Waurika Project Master Conservancy 
District payable to the United States Government in the amounts, rates 
of interest, and payment schedules is set at the amounts, rates of 
interest, and payment schedules that existed, and that both parties 
agreed to, on June 3, 1986, and may not be adjusted, altered, or 
changed without a specific, separate, and written agreement between the 
District and the United States Government.

SEC. 588. COLUMBIA RIVER TREATY FISHING ACCESS.

    Section 401(d) of the Act entitled ``An Act to establish procedures 
for review of tribal constitutions and bylaws or amendments thereto 
pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 987)'', approved 
November 1, 1988 (102 Stat. 2944), is amended by striking 
``$2,000,000'' and inserting ``$4,000,000''.

SEC. 589. DEVILS LAKE, NORTH DAKOTA.

    No appropriation shall be made to construct an emergency outlet 
from Devils Lake, North Dakota, to the Sheyenne River if the final 
plans for the emergency outlet have not been approved by resolutions 
adopted by the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the 
House of Representatives and the Committee on Environment and Public 
Works of the Senate.

             TITLE VI--COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION

SEC. 601. COMPREHENSIVE EVERGLADES RESTORATION PLAN.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Central and southern florida project.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``Central and Southern 
                Florida Project'' means the project for Central and 
                Southern Florida authorized under the heading ``central 
                and southern florida'' in section 203 of the Flood 
                Control Act of 1948 (62 Stat. 1176).
                    (B) Inclusion.--The term ``Central and Southern 
                Florida Project'' includes any modification to the 
                project authorized by this section or any other 
                provision of law.
            (2) Governor.--The term ``Governor'' means the Governor of 
        the State of Florida.
            (3) Natural system.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``natural system'' means 
                all land and water managed by the Federal Government or 
                the State within the South Florida ecosystem.
                    (B) Inclusions.--The term ``natural system'' 
                includes--
                            (i) water conservation areas;
                            (ii) sovereign submerged land;
                            (iii) Everglades National Park;
                            (iv) Biscayne National Park;
                            (v) Big Cypress National Preserve;
                            (vi) other Federal or State (including a 
                        political subdivision of a State) land that is 
                        designated and managed for conservation 
                        purposes; and
                            (vii) any tribal land that is designated 
                        and managed for conservation purposes, as 
                        approved by the tribe.
            (4) Plan.--The term ``Plan'' means the Comprehensive 
        Everglades Restoration Plan contained in the ``Final Integrated 
        Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact 
        Statement'', dated April 1, 1999, as modified by this section.
            (5) South florida ecosystem.--
                    (A) In general.--The term ``South Florida 
                ecosystem'' means the area consisting of the land and 
                water within the boundary of the South Florida Water 
                Management District in effect on July 1, 1999.
                    (B) Inclusions.--The term ``South Florida 
                ecosystem'' includes--
                            (i) the Everglades;
                            (ii) the Florida Keys; and
                            (iii) the contiguous near-shore coastal 
                        water of South Florida.
            (6) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of Florida.
    (b) Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan.--
            (1) Approval.--
                    (A) In general.--Except as modified by this 
                section, the Plan is approved as a framework for 
                modifications and operational changes to the Central 
                and Southern Florida Project that are needed to 
                restore, preserve, and protect the South Florida 
                ecosystem while providing for other water-related needs 
                of the region, including water supply and flood 
                protection. The Plan shall be implemented to ensure the 
                protection of water quality in, the reduction of the 
                loss of fresh water from, and the improvement of the 
                environment of the South Florida ecosystem and to 
                achieve and maintain the benefits to the natural system 
                and human environment described in the Plan, and 
                required pursuant to this section, for as long as the 
                project is authorized.
                    (B) Integration.--In carrying out the Plan, the 
                Secretary shall integrate the activities described in 
                subparagraph (A) with ongoing Federal and State 
                projects and activities in accordance with section 
                528(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 
                (110 Stat. 3769). Unless specifically provided herein, 
                nothing in this section shall be construed to modify 
                any existing cost share or responsibility for projects 
                as listed in subsection (c) or (e) of section 528 of 
                the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 
                3769).
            (2) Specific authorizations.--
                    (A) In general.--
                            (i) Projects.--The Secretary shall carry 
                        out the projects included in the Plan in 
                        accordance with subparagraphs (B), (C), (D), 
                        and (E).
                            (ii) Considerations.--In carrying out 
                        activities described in the Plan, the Secretary 
                        shall--
                                    (I) take into account the 
                                protection of water quality by 
                                considering applicable State water 
                                quality standards; and
                                    (II) include such features as the 
                                Secretary determines are necessary to 
                                ensure that all ground water and 
                                surface water discharges from any 
                                project feature authorized by this 
                                subsection will meet all applicable 
                                water quality standards and applicable 
                                water quality permitting requirements.
                            (iii) Review and comment.--In developing 
                        the projects authorized under subparagraph (B), 
                        the Secretary shall provide for public review 
                        and comment in accordance with applicable 
                        Federal law.
                    (B) Pilot projects.--The following pilot projects 
                are authorized for implementation, after review and 
                approval by the Secretary, at a total cost of 
                $69,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $34,500,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $34,500,000:
                            (i) Caloosahatchee River (C-43) Basin ASR, 
                        at a total cost of $6,000,000, with an 
                        estimated Federal cost of $3,000,000 and an 
                        estimated non-Federal cost of $3,000,000.
                            (ii) Lake Belt In-Ground Reservoir 
                        Technology, at a total cost of $23,000,000, 
                        with an estimated Federal cost of $11,500,000 
                        and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                        $11,500,000.
                            (iii) L-31N Seepage Management, at a total 
                        cost of $10,000,000, with an estimated Federal 
                        cost of $5,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal 
                        cost of $5,000,000.
                            (iv) Wastewater Reuse Technology, at a 
                        total cost of $30,000,000, with an estimated 
                        Federal cost of $15,000,000 and an estimated 
                        non-Federal cost of $15,000,000.
                    (C) Initial projects.--The following projects are 
                authorized for implementation, after review and 
                approval by the Secretary, subject to the conditions 
                stated in subparagraph (D), at a total cost of 
                $1,100,918,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $550,459,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $550,459,000:
                            (i) C-44 Basin Storage Reservoir, at a 
                        total cost of $112,562,000, with an estimated 
                        Federal cost of $56,281,000 and an estimated 
                        non-Federal cost of $56,281,000.
                            (ii) Everglades Agricultural Area Storage 
                        Reservoirs--Phase I, at a total cost of 
                        $233,408,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                        $116,704,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                        of $116,704,000.
                            (iii) Site 1 Impoundment, at a total cost 
                        of $38,535,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
                        of $19,267,500 and an estimated non-Federal 
                        cost of $19,267,500.
                            (iv) Water Conservation Areas 3A/3B Levee 
                        Seepage Management, at a total cost of 
                        $100,335,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                        $50,167,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                        of $50,167,500.
                            (v) C-11 Impoundment and Stormwater 
                        Treatment Area, at a total cost of 
                        $124,837,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                        $62,418,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                        of $62,418,500.
                            (vi) C-9 Impoundment and Stormwater 
                        Treatment Area, at a total cost of $89,146,000, 
                        with an estimated Federal cost of $44,573,000 
                        and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                        $44,573,000.
                            (vii) Taylor Creek/Nubbin Slough Storage 
                        and Treatment Area, at a total cost of 
                        $104,027,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                        $52,013,500 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                        of $52,013,500.
                            (viii) Raise and Bridge East Portion of 
                        Tamiami Trail and Fill Miami Canal within Water 
                        Conservation Area 3, at a total cost of 
                        $26,946,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                        $13,473,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost 
                        of $13,473,000.
                            (ix) North New River Improvements, at a 
                        total cost of $77,087,000, with an estimated 
                        Federal cost of $38,543,500 and an estimated 
                        non-Federal cost of $38,543,500.
                            (x) C-111 Spreader Canal, at a total cost 
                        of $94,035,000, with an estimated Federal cost 
                        of $47,017,500 and an estimated non-Federal 
                        cost of $47,017,500.
                            (xi) Adaptive Assessment and Monitoring 
                        Program, at a total cost of $100,000,000, with 
                        an estimated Federal cost of $50,000,000 and an 
                        estimated non-Federal cost of $50,000,000.
                    (D) Conditions.--
                            (i) Project implementation reports.--Before 
                        implementation of a project described in any of 
                        clauses (i) through (x) of subparagraph (C), 
                        the Secretary shall review and approve for the 
                        project a project implementation report 
                        prepared in accordance with subsections (f) and 
                        (h).
                            (ii) Submission of report.--The Secretary 
                        shall submit to the Committee on Transportation 
                        and Infrastructure of the House of 
                        Representatives and the Committee on 
                        Environment and Public Works of the Senate the 
                        project implementation report required by 
                        subsections (f) and (h) for each project under 
                        this paragraph (including all relevant data and 
                        information on all costs).
                            (iii) Funding contingent on approval.--No 
                        appropriation shall be made to construct any 
                        project under this paragraph if the project 
                        implementation report for the project has not 
                        been approved by resolutions adopted by the 
                        Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 
                        of the House of Representatives and the 
                        Committee on Environment and Public Works of 
                        the Senate.
                            (iv) Modified water delivery.--No 
                        appropriation shall be made to construct the 
                        Water Conservation Area 3 
                        Decompartmentalization and Sheetflow 
                        Enhancement Project (including component AA, 
                        Additional S-345 Structures; component QQ Phase 
                        1, Raise and Bridge East Portion of Tamiami 
                        Trail and Fill Miami Canal within WCA 3; 
                        component QQ Phase 2, WCA 3 
                        Decompartmentalization and Sheetflow 
                        Enhancement; and component SS, North New River 
                        Improvements) or the Central Lakebelt Storage 
                        Project (including components S and EEE, 
                        Central Lake Belt Storage Area) until the 
                        completion of the project to improve water 
                        deliveries to Everglades National Park 
                        authorized by section 104 of the Everglades 
                        National Park Protection and Expansion Act of 
                        1989 (16 U.S.C. 410r-8).
                    (E) Maximum cost of projects.--Section 902 of the 
                Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (33 U.S.C. 
                2280) shall apply to each project feature authorized 
                under this subsection.
    (c) Additional Program Authority.--
            (1) In general.--To expedite implementation of the Plan, 
        the Secretary may implement modifications to the Central and 
        Southern Florida Project that--
                    (A) are described in the Plan; and
                    (B) will produce a substantial benefit to the 
                restoration, preservation and protection of the South 
                Florida ecosystem.
            (2) Project implementation reports.--Before implementation 
        of any project feature authorized under this subsection, the 
        Secretary shall review and approve for the project feature a 
        project implementation report prepared in accordance with 
        subsections (f) and (h).
            (3) Funding.--
                    (A) Individual project funding.--
                            (i) Federal cost.--The total Federal cost 
                        of each project carried out under this 
                        subsection shall not exceed $12,500,000.
                            (ii) Overall cost.--The total cost of each 
                        project carried out under this subsection shall 
                        not exceed $25,000,000.
                    (B) Aggregate cost.--The total cost of all projects 
                carried out under this subsection shall not exceed 
                $206,000,000, with an estimated Federal cost of 
                $103,000,000 and an estimated non-Federal cost of 
                $103,000,000.
    (d) Authorization of Future Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Except for a project authorized by 
        subsection (b) or (c), any project included in the Plan shall 
        require a specific authorization by Congress.
            (2) Submission of report.--Before seeking congressional 
        authorization for a project under paragraph (1), the Secretary 
        shall submit to Congress--
                    (A) a description of the project; and
                    (B) a project implementation report for the project 
                prepared in accordance with subsections (f) and (h).
    (e) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost of 
        carrying out a project authorized by subsection (b), (c), or 
        (d) shall be 50 percent.
            (2) Non-federal responsibilities.--The non-Federal sponsor 
        with respect to a project described in subsection (b), (c), or 
        (d), shall be--
                    (A) responsible for all land, easements, rights-of-
                way, and relocations necessary to implement the Plan; 
                and
                    (B) afforded credit toward the non-Federal share of 
                the cost of carrying out the project in accordance with 
                paragraph (5)(A).
            (3) Federal assistance.--
                    (A) In general.--The non-Federal sponsor with 
                respect to a project authorized by subsection (b), (c), 
                or (d) may use Federal funds for the purchase of any 
                land, easement, rights-of-way, or relocation that is 
                necessary to carry out the project if any funds so used 
                are credited toward the Federal share of the cost of 
                the project.
                    (B) Agriculture funds.--Funds provided to the non-
                Federal sponsor under the Conservation Restoration and 
                Enhancement Program (CREP) and the Wetlands Reserve 
                Program (WRP) for projects in the Plan shall be 
                credited toward the non-Federal share of the cost of 
                the Plan if the Secretary of Agriculture certifies that 
                the funds provided may be used for that purpose. Funds 
                to be credited do not include funds provided under 
                section 390 of the Federal Agriculture Improvement and 
                Reform Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 1022).
            (4) Operation and maintenance.--Notwithstanding section 
        528(e)(3) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
        Stat. 3770), the non-Federal sponsor shall be responsible for 
        50 percent of the cost of operation, maintenance, repair, 
        replacement, and rehabilitation activities authorized under 
        this section. Furthermore, the Seminole Tribe of Florida shall 
        be responsible for 50 percent of the cost of operation, 
        maintenance, repair, replacement, and rehabilitation activities 
        for the Big Cypress Seminole Reservation Water Conservation 
        Plan Project.
            (5) Credit.--
                    (A) In general.--Notwithstanding section 528(e)(4) 
                of the Water Resources Development Act of 1996 (110 
                Stat. 3770) and regardless of the date of acquisition, 
                the value of lands or interests in lands and incidental 
                costs for land acquired by a non-Federal sponsor in 
                accordance with a project implementation report for any 
                project included in the Plan and authorized by Congress 
                shall be--
                            (i) included in the total cost of the 
                        project; and
                            (ii) credited toward the non-Federal share 
                        of the cost of the project.
                    (B) Work.--The Secretary may provide credit, 
                including in-kind credit, toward the non-Federal share 
                for the reasonable cost of any work performed in 
                connection with a study, preconstruction engineering 
                and design, or construction that is necessary for the 
                implementation of the Plan if--
                            (i)(I) the credit is provided for work 
                        completed during the period of design, as 
                        defined in a design agreement between the 
                        Secretary and the non-Federal sponsor; or
                            (II) the credit is provided for work 
                        completed during the period of construction, as 
                        defined in a project cooperation agreement for 
                        an authorized project between the Secretary and 
                        the non-Federal sponsor;
                            (ii) the design agreement or the project 
                        cooperation agreement prescribes the terms and 
                        conditions of the credit; and
                            (iii) the Secretary determines that the 
                        work performed by the non-Federal sponsor is 
                        integral to the project.
                    (C) Treatment of credit between projects.--Any 
                credit provided under this paragraph may be carried 
                over between authorized projects in accordance with 
                subparagraph (D).
                    (D) Periodic monitoring.--
                            (i) In general.--To ensure that the 
                        contributions of the non-Federal sponsor equal 
                        50 percent proportionate share for projects in 
                        the Plan, during each 5-year period, beginning 
                        with commencement of design of the Plan, the 
                        Secretary shall, for each project--
                                    (I) monitor the non-Federal 
                                provision of cash, in-kind services, 
                                and land; and
                                    (II) manage, to the maximum extent 
                                practicable, the requirement of the 
                                non-Federal sponsor to provide cash, 
                                in-kind services, and land.
                            (ii) Other monitoring.--The Secretary shall 
                        conduct monitoring under clause (i) separately 
                        for the preconstruction engineering and design 
                        phase and the construction phase.
                    (E) Audits.--Credit for land (including land value 
                and incidental costs) or work provided under this 
                subsection shall be subject to audit by the Secretary.
    (f) Evaluation of Projects.--
            (1) In general.--Before implementation of a project 
        authorized by subsection (c) or (d) or any of clauses (i) 
        through (x) of subsection (b)(2)(C), the Secretary, in 
        cooperation with the non-Federal sponsor, shall complete, after 
        notice and opportunity for public comment and in accordance 
        with subsection (h), a project implementation report for the 
        project.
            (2) Project justification.--
                    (A) In general.--Notwithstanding section 209 of the 
                Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962-2) or any 
                other provision of law, in carrying out any activity 
                authorized under this section or any other provision of 
                law to restore, preserve, or protect the South Florida 
                ecosystem, the Secretary may determine that--
                            (i) the activity is justified by the 
                        environmental benefits derived by the South 
                        Florida ecosystem; and
                            (ii) no further economic justification for 
                        the activity is required, if the Secretary 
                        determines that the activity is cost-effective.
                    (B) Applicability.--Subparagraph (A) shall not 
                apply to any separable element intended to produce 
                benefits that are predominantly unrelated to the 
                restoration, preservation, and protection of the 
                natural system.
    (g) Exclusions and Limitations.--The following Plan components are 
not approved for implementation:
            (1) Water included in the plan.--
                    (A) In general.--Any project that is designed to 
                implement the capture and use of the approximately 
                245,000 acre-feet of water described in section 7.7.2 
                of the Plan shall not be implemented until such time 
                as--
                            (i) the project-specific feasibility study 
                        described in subparagraph (B) on the need for 
                        and physical delivery of the approximately 
                        245,000 acre-feet of water, conducted by the 
                        Secretary, in cooperation with the non-Federal 
                        sponsor, is completed;
                            (ii) the project is favorably recommended 
                        in a final report of the Chief of Engineers; 
                        and
                            (iii) the project is authorized by Act of 
                        Congress.
                    (B) Project-specific feasibility study.--The 
                project-specific feasibility study referred to in 
                subparagraph (A) shall include--
                            (i) a comprehensive analysis of the 
                        structural facilities proposed to deliver the 
                        approximately 245,000 acre-feet of water to the 
                        natural system;
                            (ii) an assessment of the requirements to 
                        divert and treat the water;
                            (iii) an assessment of delivery 
                        alternatives;
                            (iv) an assessment of the feasibility of 
                        delivering the water downstream while 
                        maintaining current levels of flood protection 
                        to affected property; and
                            (v) any other assessments that are 
                        determined by the Secretary to be necessary to 
                        complete the study.
            (2) Wastewater reuse.--
                    (A) In general.--On completion and evaluation of 
                the wastewater reuse pilot project described in 
                subsection (b)(2)(B)(iv), the Secretary, in an 
                appropriately timed 5-year report, shall describe the 
                results of the evaluation of advanced wastewater reuse 
                in meeting, in a cost-effective manner, the 
                requirements of restoration of the natural system.
                    (B) Submission.--The Secretary shall submit to 
                Congress the report described in subparagraph (A) 
                before congressional authorization for advanced 
                wastewater reuse is sought.
            (3) Projects approved with limitations.--The following 
        projects in the Plan are approved for implementation with 
        limitations:
                    (A) Loxahatchee national wildlife refuge.--The 
                Federal share for land acquisition in the project to 
                enhance existing wetland systems along the Loxahatchee 
                National Wildlife Refuge, including the Stazzulla 
                tract, should be funded through the budget of the 
                Department of the Interior.
                    (B) Southern corkscrew regional ecosystem.--The 
                Southern Corkscrew regional ecosystem watershed 
                addition should be accomplished outside the scope of 
                the Plan.
    (h) Assurance of Project Benefits.--
            (1) In general.--The overarching objective of the Plan is 
        the restoration, preservation, and protection of the South 
        Florida Ecosystem while providing for other water-related needs 
        of the region, including water supply and flood protection. The 
        Plan shall be implemented to ensure the protection of water 
        quality in, the reduction of the loss of fresh water from, the 
        improvement of the environment of the South Florida Ecosystem 
        and to achieve and maintain the benefits to the natural system 
        and human environment described in the Plan, and required 
        pursuant to this section, for as long as the project is 
        authorized.
            (2) Agreement.--
                    (A) In general.--In order to ensure that water 
                generated by the Plan will be made available for the 
                restoration of the natural system, no appropriations, 
                except for any pilot project described in subsection 
                (b)(2)(B), shall be made for the construction of a 
                project contained in the Plan until the President and 
                the Governor enter into a binding agreement under which 
                the State shall ensure, by regulation or other 
                appropriate means, that water made available by each 
                project in the Plan shall not be permitted for a 
                consumptive use or otherwise made unavailable by the 
                State until such time as sufficient reservations of 
                water for the restoration of the natural system are 
                made under State law in accordance with the project 
                implementation report for that project and consistent 
                with the Plan.
                    (B) Enforcement.--
                            (i) In general.--Any person or entity that 
                        is aggrieved by a failure of the United States 
                        or any other Federal Government instrumentality 
                        or agency, or the Governor or any other officer 
                        of a State instrumentality or agency, to comply 
                        with any provision of the agreement entered 
                        into under subparagraph (A) may bring a civil 
                        action in United States district court for an 
                        injunction directing the United States or any 
                        other Federal Government instrumentality or 
                        agency or the Governor or any other officer of 
                        a State instrumentality or agency, as the case 
                        may be, to comply with the agreement.
                            (ii) Limitations on commencement of civil 
                        action.--No civil action may be commenced under 
                        clause (i)--
                                    (I) before the date that is 60 days 
                                after the Secretary and the Governor 
                                receive written notice of a failure to 
                                comply with the agreement; or
                                    (II) if the United States has 
                                commenced and is diligently prosecuting 
                                an action in a court of the United 
                                States or a State to redress a failure 
                                to comply with the agreement.
                    (C) Trust responsibilities.--In carrying out his 
                responsibilities under this subsection with respect to 
                the restoration of the South Florida ecosystem, the 
                Secretary of the Interior shall fulfill his obligations 
                to the Indian tribes in South Florida under the Indian 
                trust doctrine as well as other applicable legal 
                obligations.
            (3) Programmatic regulations.--
                    (A) Issuance.--Not later than 2 years after the 
                date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall, 
                after notice and opportunity for public comment, with 
                the concurrence of the Governor and the Secretary of 
                the Interior, and in consultation with the Seminole 
                Tribe of Florida, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of 
                Florida, the Administrator of the Environmental 
                Protection Agency, the Secretary of Commerce, and other 
                Federal, State, and local agencies, promulgate 
                programmatic regulations to ensure that the goals and 
                purposes of the Plan are achieved.
                    (B) Concurrency statement.--The Secretary of the 
                Interior and the Governor shall, not later than 180 
                days from the end of the public comment period on 
                proposed programmatic regulations, provide the 
                Secretary with a written statement of concurrence or 
                nonconcurrence. A failure to provide a written 
                statement of concurrence or nonconcurrence within such 
                time frame will be deemed as meeting the concurrency 
                requirements of subparagraph (A)(i). A copy of any 
                concurrency or nonconcurrency statements shall be made 
                a part of the administrative record and referenced in 
                the final programmatic regulations. Any nonconcurrency 
                statement shall specifically detail the reason or 
                reasons for the nonconcurrence.
                    (C) Content of regulations.--
                            (i) In general.--Programmatic regulations 
                        promulgated under this paragraph shall 
                        establish a process--
                                    (I) for the development of project 
                                implementation reports, project 
                                cooperation agreements, and operating 
                                manuals that ensure that the goals and 
                                objectives of the Plan are achieved;
                                    (II) to ensure that new information 
                                resulting from changed or unforeseen 
                                circumstances, new scientific or 
                                technical information or information 
                                that is developed through the 
                                principles of adaptive management 
                                contained in the Plan, or future 
                                authorized changes to the Plan are 
                                integrated into the implementation of 
                                the Plan; and
                                    (III) to ensure the protection of 
                                the natural system consistent with the 
                                goals and purposes of the Plan, 
                                including the establishment of interim 
                                goals to provide a means by which the 
                                restoration success of the Plan may be 
                                evaluated throughout the implementation 
                                process.
                            (ii) Limitation on applicability of 
                        programmatic regulations.--Programmatic 
                        regulations promulgated under this paragraph 
                        shall expressly prohibit the requirement for 
                        concurrence by the Secretary of the Interior or 
                        the Governor on project implementation reports, 
                        project cooperation agreements, operating 
                        manuals for individual projects undertaken in 
                        the Plan, and any other documents relating to 
                        the development, implementation, and management 
                        of individual features of the Plan, unless such 
                        concurrence is provided for in other Federal or 
                        State laws.
                    (D) Schedule and transition rule.--
                            (i) In general.--All project implementation 
                        reports approved before the date of 
                        promulgation of the programmatic regulations 
                        shall be consistent with the Plan.
                            (ii) Preamble.--The preamble of the 
                        programmatic regulations shall include a 
                        statement concerning the consistency with the 
                        programmatic regulations of any project 
                        implementation reports that were approved 
                        before the date of promulgation of the 
                        regulations.
                    (E) Review of programmatic regulations.--Whenever 
                necessary to attain Plan goals and purposes, but not 
                less often than every 5 years, the Secretary, in 
                accordance with subparagraph (A), shall review the 
                programmatic regulations promulgated under this 
                paragraph.
            (4) Project-specific assurances.--
                    (A) Project implementation reports.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary and the non-
                        Federal sponsor shall develop project 
                        implementation reports in accordance with 
                        section 10.3.1 of the Plan.
                            (ii) Coordination.--In developing a project 
                        implementation report, the Secretary and the 
                        non-Federal sponsor shall coordinate with 
                        appropriate Federal, State, tribal, and local 
                        governments.
                            (iii) Requirements.--A project 
                        implementation report shall--
                                    (I) be consistent with the Plan and 
                                the programmatic regulations 
                                promulgated under paragraph (3);
                                    (II) describe how each of the 
                                requirements stated in paragraph (3)(B) 
                                is satisfied;
                                    (III) comply with the National 
                                Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 
                                U.S.C. 4321 et seq.);
                                    (IV) identify the appropriate 
                                quantity, timing, and distribution of 
                                water dedicated and managed for the 
                                natural system;
                                    (V) identify the amount of water to 
                                be reserved or allocated for the 
                                natural system necessary to implement, 
                                under State law, subclauses (IV) and 
                                (VI);
                                    (VI) comply with applicable water 
                                quality standards and applicable water 
                                quality permitting requirements under 
                                subsection (b)(2)(A)(ii);
                                    (VII) be based on the best 
                                available science; and
                                    (VIII) include an analysis 
                                concerning the cost-effectiveness and 
                                engineering feasibility of the project.
                    (B) Project cooperation agreements.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary and the non-
                        Federal sponsor shall execute project 
                        cooperation agreements in accordance with 
                        section 10 of the Plan.
                            (ii) Condition.--The Secretary shall not 
                        execute a project cooperation agreement until 
                        any reservation or allocation of water for the 
                        natural system identified in the project 
                        implementation report is executed under State 
                        law.
                    (C) Operating manuals.--
                            (i) In general.--The Secretary and the non-
                        Federal sponsor shall develop and issue, for 
                        each project or group of projects, an operating 
                        manual that is consistent with the water 
                        reservation or allocation for the natural 
                        system described in the project implementation 
                        report and the project cooperation agreement 
                        for the project or group of projects.
                            (ii) Modifications.--Any significant 
                        modification by the Secretary and the non-
                        Federal sponsor to an operating manual after 
                        the operating manual is issued shall only be 
                        carried out subject to notice and opportunity 
                        for public comment.
            (5) Savings clause.--
                    (A) No elimination or transfer.--Until a new source 
                of water supply of comparable quantity and quality as 
                that available on the date of enactment of this Act is 
                available to replace the water to be lost as a result 
                of implementation of the Plan, the Secretary and the 
                non-Federal sponsor shall not eliminate or transfer 
                existing legal sources of water, including those for--
                            (i) an agricultural or urban water supply;
                            (ii) allocation or entitlement to the 
                        Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida under section 
                        7 of the Seminole Indian Land Claims Settlement 
                        Act of 1987 (25 U.S.C. 1772e);
                            (iii) the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of 
                        Florida;
                            (iv) water supply for Everglades National 
                        Park; or
                            (v) water supply for fish and wildlife.
                    (B) Maintenance of flood protection.--
                Implementation of the Plan shall not reduce levels of 
                service for flood protection that are--
                            (i) in existence on the date of enactment 
                        of this Act; and
                            (ii) in accordance with applicable law.
                    (C) No effect on tribal compact.--Nothing in this 
                section amends, alters, prevents, or otherwise 
                abrogates rights of the Seminole Indian Tribe of 
                Florida under the compact among the Seminole Tribe of 
                Florida, the State, and the South Florida Water 
                Management District, defining the scope and use of 
                water rights of the Seminole Tribe of Florida, as 
                codified by section 7 of the Seminole Indian Land 
                Claims Settlement Act of 1987 (25 U.S.C. 1772e).
    (i) Dispute Resolution.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary and the Governor shall 
        within 180 days from the date of enactment of this Act develop 
        an agreement for resolving disputes between the Corps of 
        Engineers and the State associated with the implementation of 
        the Plan. Such agreement shall establish a mechanism for the 
        timely and efficient resolution of disputes, including--
                    (A) a preference for the resolution of disputes 
                between the Jacksonville District of the Corps of 
                Engineers and the South Florida Water Management 
                District;
                    (B) a mechanism for the Jacksonville District of 
                the Corps of Engineers or the South Florida Water 
                Management District to initiate the dispute resolution 
                process for unresolved issues;
                    (C) the establishment of appropriate timeframes and 
                intermediate steps for the elevation of disputes to the 
                Governor and the Secretary; and
                    (D) a mechanism for the final resolution of 
                disputes, within 180 days from the date that the 
                dispute resolution process is initiated under 
                subparagraph (B).
            (2) Condition for report approval.--The Secretary shall not 
        approve a project implementation report under this section 
        until the agreement established under this subsection has been 
        executed.
            (3) No effect on law.--Nothing in the agreement established 
        under this subsection shall alter or amend any existing Federal 
        or State law, or the responsibility of any party to the 
        agreement to comply with any Federal or State law.
    (j) Independent Scientific Review.--
            (1) In general.--The Secretary, the Secretary of the 
        Interior, and the Governor, in consultation with the South 
        Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, shall establish an 
        independent scientific review panel convened by a body, such as 
        the National Academy of Sciences, to review the Plan's progress 
        toward achieving the natural system restoration goals of the 
        Plan.
            (2) Report.--The panel described in paragraph (1) shall 
        produce a biennial report to Congress, the Secretary, the 
        Secretary of the Interior, and the Governor that includes an 
        assessment of ecological indicators and other measures of 
        progress in restoring the ecology of the natural system, based 
        on the Plan.
    (k) Outreach and Assistance.--
            (1) Small business concerns owned and operated by socially 
        and economically disadvantaged individuals.--In executing the 
        Plan, the Secretary shall ensure that small business concerns 
        owned and controlled by socially and economically disadvantaged 
        individuals are provided opportunities to participate under 
        section 15(g) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 644(g)).
            (2) Community outreach and education.--
                    (A) In general.--The Secretary shall ensure that 
                impacts on socially and economically disadvantaged 
                individuals, including individuals with limited English 
                proficiency, and communities are considered during 
                implementation of the Plan, and that such individuals 
                have opportunities to review and comment on its 
                implementation.
                    (B) Provision of opportunities.--The Secretary 
                shall ensure, to the maximum extent practicable, that 
                public outreach and educational opportunities are 
                provided, during implementation of the Plan, to the 
                individuals of South Florida, including individuals 
                with limited English proficiency, and in particular for 
                socially and economically disadvantaged communities.
    (l) Report to Congress.--Beginning on October 1, 2005, and 
periodically thereafter until October 1, 2036, the Secretary and the 
Secretary of the Interior, in consultation with the Environmental 
Protection Agency, the Department of Commerce, and the State of 
Florida, shall jointly submit to Congress a report on the 
implementation of the Plan. Such reports shall be completed not less 
often than every 5 years. Such reports shall include a description of 
planning, design, and construction work completed, the amount of funds 
expended during the period covered by the report (including a detailed 
analysis of the funds expended for adaptive assessment under subsection 
(b)(2)(C)(xi)), and the work anticipated over the next 5-year period. 
In addition, each report shall include--
            (1) the determination of each Secretary, and the 
        Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, 
        concerning the benefits to the natural system and the human 
        environment achieved as of the date of the report and whether 
        the completed projects of the Plan are being operated in a 
        manner that is consistent with the requirements of subsection 
        (h);
            (2) progress toward interim goals established in accordance 
        with subsection (h)(3)(B); and
            (3) a review of the activities performed by the Secretary 
        under subsection (k) as they relate to socially and 
        economically disadvantaged individuals and individuals with 
        limited English proficiency.
    (m) Report on Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project.--Not later than 
180 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
transmit to Congress a report containing a determination as to whether 
the ongoing Biscayne Aquifer Storage and Recovery Program located in 
Miami-Dade County has a substantial benefit to the restoration, 
preservation, and protection of the South Florida ecosystem.
    (n) Full Disclosure of Proposed Funding.--
            (1) Funding from all sources.--The President, as part of 
        the annual budget of the United States Government, shall 
        display under the heading ``Everglades Restoration'' all 
        proposed funding for the Plan for all agency programs.
            (2) Funding from corps of engineers civil works program.--
        The President, as part of the annual budget of the United 
        States Government, shall display under the accounts 
        ``Construction, General'' and ``Operation and Maintenance, 
        General'' of the title ``Department of Defense--Civil, 
        Department of the Army, Corps of Engineers--Civil'', the total 
        proposed funding level for each account for the Plan and the 
        percentage such level represents of the overall levels in such 
        accounts. The President shall also include an assessment of the 
        impact such funding levels for the Plan would have on the 
        budget year and long-term funding levels for the overall Corps 
        of Engineers civil works program.
    (o) Surplus Federal Lands.--Section 390(f)(2)(A)(i) of the Federal 
Agriculture Improvement and Reform Act of 1996 (110 Stat. 1023) is 
amended by inserting after ``on or after the date of enactment of this 
Act'' the following: ``and before the date of enactment of the Water 
Resource Development Act of 2000''.
    (p) Severability.--If any provision or remedy provided by this 
section is found to be unconstitutional or unenforceable by any court 
of competent jurisdiction, any remaining provisions in this section 
shall remain valid and enforceable.

SEC. 602. SENSE OF CONGRESS CONCERNING HOMESTEAD AIR FORCE BASE.

    (a) Findings.--Congress finds that--
            (1) the Everglades is an American treasure and includes 
        uniquely-important and diverse wildlife resources and 
        recreational opportunities;
            (2) the preservation of the pristine and natural character 
        of the South Florida ecosystem is critical to the regional 
        economy;
            (3) as this legislation demonstrates, Congress believes it 
        to be a vital national mission to restore and preserve this 
        ecosystem and accordingly is authorizing a significant Federal 
        investment to do so;
            (4) Congress seeks to have the remaining property at the 
        former Homestead Air Base conveyed and reused as expeditiously 
        as possible, and several options for base reuse are being 
        considered, including as a commercial airport; and
            (5) Congress is aware that the Homestead site is located in 
        a sensitive environmental location, and that Biscayne National 
        Park is only approximately 1.5 miles to the east, Everglades 
        National Park approximately 8 miles to the west, and the 
        Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary approximately 10 miles 
        to the south.
    (b) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that--
            (1) development at the Homestead site could potentially 
        cause significant air, water, and noise pollution and result in 
        the degradation of adjacent national parks and other protected 
        Federal resources;
            (2) in their decisionmaking, the Federal agencies charged 
        with determining the reuse of the remaining property at the 
        Homestead base should carefully consider and weigh all 
        available information concerning potential environmental 
        impacts of various reuse options;
            (3) the redevelopment of the former base should be 
        consistent with restoration goals, provide desirable numbers of 
        jobs and economic redevelopment for the community, and be 
        consistent with other applicable laws;
            (4) consistent with applicable laws, the Secretary of the 
        Air Force should proceed as quickly as practicable to issue a 
        final SEIS and Record of Decision so that reuse of the former 
        air base can proceed expeditiously;
            (5) following conveyance of the remaining surplus property, 
        the Secretary, as part of his oversight for Everglades 
        restoration, should cooperate with the entities to which the 
        various parcels of surplus property were conveyed so that the 
        planned use of those properties is implemented in such a manner 
        as to remain consistent with the goals of the Everglades 
        restoration plan; and
            (6) by August 1, 2002, the Secretary should submit a report 
        to the appropriate committees of Congress on actions taken and 
        make any recommendations for consideration by Congress.

                 TITLE VII--MISSOURI RIVER RESTORATION

SEC. 701. DEFINITIONS.

    In this title, the following definitions apply:
            (1) Pick-sloan program.--The term ``Pick-Sloan program'' 
        means the Pick-Sloan Missouri River Basin Program authorized by 
        section 9 of the Act of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 891).
            (2) Plan.--The term ``plan'' means the plan for the use of 
        funds made available by this title that is required to be 
        prepared under section 705(e).
            (3) State.--The term ``State'' means the State of South 
        Dakota.
            (4) Task force.--The term ``Task Force'' means the Missouri 
        River Task Force established by section 705(a).
            (6) Trust.--The term ``Trust'' means the Missouri River 
        Trust established by section 704(a).

SEC. 702. MISSOURI RIVER TRUST.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established a committee to be known as 
the Missouri River Trust.
    (b) Membership.--The Trust shall be composed of 25 members to be 
appointed by the Secretary, including--
            (1) 15 members recommended by the Governor of South Dakota 
        that--
                    (A) represent equally the various interests of the 
                public; and
                    (B) include representatives of--
                            (i) the South Dakota Department of 
                        Environment and Natural Resources;
                            (ii) the South Dakota Department of Game, 
                        Fish, and Parks;
                            (iii) environmental groups;
                            (iv) the hydroelectric power industry;
                            (v) local governments;
                            (vi) recreation user groups;
                            (vii) agricultural groups; and
                            (viii) other appropriate interests;
            (2) 9 members, 1 of each of whom shall be recommended by 
        each of the 9 Indian tribes in the State of South Dakota; and
            (3) 1 member recommended by the organization known as the 
        ``Three Affiliated Tribes of North Dakota'' (composed of the 
        Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikara tribes).

SEC. 703. MISSOURI RIVER TASK FORCE.

    (a) Establishment.--There is established the Missouri River Task 
Force.
    (b) Membership.--The Task Force shall be composed of--
            (1) the Secretary (or a designee), who shall serve as 
        Chairperson;
            (2) the Secretary of Agriculture (or a designee);
            (3) the Secretary of Energy (or a designee);
            (4) the Secretary of the Interior (or a designee); and
            (5) the Trust.
    (c) Duties.--The Task Force shall--
            (1) meet at least twice each year;
            (2) vote on approval of the plan, with approval requiring 
        votes in favor of the plan by a majority of the members;
            (3) review projects to meet the goals of the plan; and
            (4) recommend to the Secretary critical projects for 
        implementation.
    (d) Assessment.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 1 year after the date on 
        which funding authorized under this title becomes available, 
        the Secretary shall submit to the other members of the Task 
        Force a report on--
                    (A) the impact of the siltation of the Missouri 
                River in the State, including the impact on the 
                Federal, State, and regional economies, recreation, 
                hydropower generation, fish and wildlife, and flood 
                control;
                    (B) the status of Indian and non-Indian historical 
                and cultural sites along the Missouri River;
                    (C) the extent of erosion along the Missouri River 
                (including tributaries of the Missouri River) in the 
                State; and
                    (D) other issues, as requested by the Task Force.
            (2) Consultation.--In preparing the report under paragraph 
        (1), the Secretary shall consult with the Secretary of Energy, 
        the Secretary of the Interior, the Secretary of Agriculture, 
        the State, and Indian tribes in the State.
    (e) Plan for Use of Funds Made Available by This Title.--
            (1) In general.--Not later than 2 years after the date on 
        which funding authorized under this title becomes available, 
        the Task Force shall prepare a plan for the use of funds made 
        available under this title.
            (2) Contents of plan.--The plan shall provide for the 
        manner in which the Task Force shall develop and recommend 
        critical restoration projects to promote--
                    (A) conservation practices in the Missouri River 
                watershed;
                    (B) the general control and removal of sediment 
                from the Missouri River;
                    (C) the protection of recreation on the Missouri 
                River from sedimentation;
                    (D) the protection of Indian and non-Indian 
                historical and cultural sites along the Missouri River 
                from erosion;
                    (E) erosion control along the Missouri River; or
                    (F) any combination of the activities described in 
                subparagraphs (A) through (E).
            (3) Plan review and revision.--
                    (A) In general.--The Task Force shall make a copy 
                of the plan available for public review and comment 
                before the plan becomes final, in accordance with 
                procedures established by the Task Force.
                    (B) Revision of plan.--
                            (i) In general.--The Task Force may, on an 
                        annual basis, revise the plan.
                            (ii) Public review and comment.--In 
                        revising the plan, the Task Force shall provide 
                        the public the opportunity to review and 
                        comment on any proposed revision to the plan.
    (f) Critical Restoration Projects.--
            (1) In general.--After the plan is approved by the Task 
        Force under subsection (c)(2), the Secretary, in coordination 
        with the Task Force, shall identify critical restoration 
        projects to carry out the plan.
            (2) Agreement.--The Secretary may carry out a critical 
        restoration project after entering into an agreement with an 
        appropriate non-Federal interest in accordance with section 221 
        of the Flood Control Act of 1970 (42 U.S.C. 1962d-5b).
            (3) Indian projects.--To the maximum extent practicable, 
        the Secretary shall ensure that not less than 30 percent of the 
        funds made available for critical restoration projects under 
        this title shall be used exclusively for projects that are--
                    (A) within the boundary of an Indian reservation; 
                or
                    (B) administered by an Indian tribe.
    (g) Cost Sharing.--
            (1) Assessment.--
                    (A) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
                of carrying out the assessment under subsection (d) 
                shall be 50 percent.
                    (B) Non-federal share.--The non-Federal share of 
                the cost of carrying out the assessment under 
                subsection (d) may be provided in the form of services, 
                materials, or other in-kind contributions.
            (2) Plan.--
                    (A) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
                of preparing the plan under subsection (e) shall be 50 
                percent.
                    (B) Non-federal share.--Not more than 50 percent of 
                the non-Federal share of the cost of preparing the plan 
                under subsection (e) may be provided in the form of 
                services, materials, or other in-kind contributions.
            (3) Critical restoration projects.--
                    (A) In general.--A non-Federal cost share shall be 
                required to carry out any critical restoration project 
                under subsection (f) that does not primarily benefit 
                the Federal Government, as determined by the Task 
                Force.
                    (B) Federal share.--The Federal share of the cost 
                of carrying out a critical restoration project under 
                subsection (f) for which the Task Force requires a non-
                Federal cost share under subparagraph (A) shall be 65 
                percent, not to exceed $5,000,000 for any critical 
                restoration project.
                    (C) Non-federal share.--
                            (i) In general.--Not more than 50 percent 
                        of the non-Federal share of the cost of 
                        carrying out a critical restoration project 
                        described in subparagraph (B) may be provided 
                        in the form of services, materials, or other 
                        in-kind contributions.
                            (ii) Required non-federal contributions.--
                        For any critical restoration project described 
                        in subparagraph (B), the non-Federal interest 
                        shall--
                                    (I) provide all land, easements, 
                                rights-of-way, dredged material 
                                disposal areas, and relocations;
                                    (II) pay all operation, 
                                maintenance, replacement, repair, and 
                                rehabilitation costs; and
                                    (III) hold the United States 
                                harmless from all claims arising from 
                                the construction, operation, and 
                                maintenance of the project.
                            (iii) Credit.--The non-Federal interest 
                        shall receive credit for all contributions 
                        provided under clause (ii)(I).

SEC. 704. ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Nothing in this title diminishes or affects--
            (1) any water right of an Indian tribe;
            (2) any other right of an Indian tribe, except as 
        specifically provided in another provision of this title;
            (3) any treaty right that is in effect on the date of 
        enactment of this Act;
            (4) any external boundary of an Indian reservation of an 
        Indian tribe;
            (5) any authority of the State that relates to the 
        protection, regulation, or management of fish, terrestrial 
        wildlife, and cultural and archaeological resources, except as 
        specifically provided in this title; or
            (6) any authority of the Secretary, the Secretary of the 
        Interior, or the head of any other Federal agency under a law 
        in effect on the date of enactment of this Act, including--
                    (A) the National Historic Preservation Act (16 
                U.S.C. 470 et seq.);
                    (B) the Archaeological Resources Protection Act of 
                1979 (16 U.S.C. 470aa et seq.);
                    (C) the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act (16 
                U.S.C. 661 et seq.);
                    (D) the Act entitled ``An Act for the protection of 
                the bald eagle'', approved June 8, 1940 (16 U.S.C. 668 
                et seq.);
                    (E) the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et 
                seq.);
                    (F) the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 
                1531 et seq.);
                    (G) the Native American Graves Protection and 
                Repatriation Act (25 U.S.C. 3001 et seq.);
                    (H) the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 
                U.S.C. 1251 et seq.);
                    (I) the Safe Drinking Water Act (42 U.S.C. 300f et 
                seq.); and
                    (J) the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
                (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.).
    (b) Federal Liability for Damage.--Nothing in this title relieves 
the Federal Government of liability for damage to private property 
caused by the operation of the Pick-Sloan program.
    (c) Flood Control.--Notwithstanding any other provision of this 
title, the Secretary shall retain the authority to operate the Pick-
Sloan program for the purposes of meeting the requirements of the Act 
of December 22, 1944 (58 Stat. 887, 33 U.S.C. 701-1 et seq.).

SEC. 705. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry 
out this title $4,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2001 through 2005, 
$5,000,000 for each of fiscal years 2006 through 2009, and $10,000,000 
in fiscal year 2010. Such funds shall remain available until expended.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
106th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 2796

_______________________________________________________________________

                               AMENDMENT
```