alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 8, 2019

izm

Order 

Clerk

November 8, 2019

160364 (21) 

DARRYL MCGORE, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 160364 

CoA: 350293 

CALUMET STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT 

and BARAGA COUNTY PROSECUTOR, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, Appellant’s motion for reconsideration of the October 

25, 2019 order is denied because it does not appear that the order was entered erroneously. 

Within 21 days of the date of this order, Appellant shall submit a copy of the October 25,

2019 order and refile a copy of the pleadings as ordered. Failure to comply with this order 

shall result in the dismissal of this application.
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential.



# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________

IN RE: STANLEY G. S CHWARZ, CHRISTOPHER M. MACHECA, MICHAEL GLANCY, Appellants

______________________

2015

- 1327

______________________

Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. 11/349,523.

______________________

JUDGMENT

______________________

C HARLES J OHN R OGERS , Conley Rose, P.C., Houston, TX, argued for appellants. Also represented by S TEWART N. M ESHER

, Austin, TX

.

C OKE S TEWART , Office of the Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Alexandria, VA, argued for appellee Michelle K. Lee. Also represented by T HOMAS W.
K RAUSE

, F ARHEENA Y ASMEEN R ASHEED

.

______________________

T HIS C AUSE having been heard and considered, it is

O RDERED and A DJUDGED :P ER C URIAM (P ROST

, Chief Judge, W ALLACH and
S TOLL

, Circuit Judges ).

AFFIRMED

. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

November 12, 2015 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole
Date Daniel E. O’Toole
Clerk of Court
MEMORANDUM FOR HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND

INDEPENDENT AGENCIES

UNITED STATES OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

Washington, DC 20415

The Director

FROM: BETH F. COBERT

ACTING DIRECTOR 

Subject: Issuance of New Senior Executive Service Onboarding Survey 

I am pleased to announce the issuance of a new web-based Annual Senior Executive Service (SES) 

Onboarding Survey, developed by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) with expertise and 

collaboration from the Chief Human Capital Officers Council, Senior Executives Association, Partnership 

for Public Service, National Academy of Public Administration, and current SES members. The survey 

supports the President’s Management Agenda “People and Culture” SES initiative as well as the 

December 15, 2015 Executive Order on “Strengthening the Senior Executive Service.” The survey will 

enable OPM and Federal agencies to obtain helpful data informing the continual improvement of SES 

hiring and development, and to support the implementation of SES onboarding programs required by the 

Executive Order. 

Initially, this survey will be administered to SES members who onboarded within the past two years 

(including individuals newly-appointed to the SES as well as individuals appointed to SES positions from 

other agencies), to establish baseline data. Following this initial survey launch, Federal agencies will 

regularly administer the survey to all future SES members appointed to their agencies. The survey will 

specifically obtain information on: (1) each senior executive’s onboarding experience through the first 

year of their appointment, and (2) the background of each senior executive, including their prior 

experience, origination (e.g., Federal or private sector), and development preparing them for appointment 

to the SES. 

OPM will notify agency Executive Resources staff several weeks in advance of the survey deployment, 

and will then send the survey directly to new SES members via email. OPM will regularly share the 

results of this data collection with agencies and will work with agencies to continue monitoring and 

improving hiring and onboarding programs. If you have any questions about the survey, please have your 

staff contact Stephen Shih, Deputy Associate Director, Senior Executive Services and Performance 

Management, or Julie Brill, Manager, Work-Life & Leadership and Executive Development, by telephone 

at (202) 606-8046. 

cc: Chief Human Capital Officers, Deputy Chief Human Capital Officers, and Human Resources 

Directors 

Attachment: OPM SES Onboarding Survey
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83020-83021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2020-N-0026]


Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease 
Product; MIPLYFFA (Arimoclomol)

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the 
issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a rare 
pediatric disease product application. The Federal Food, Drug, and 
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to award priority review 
vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product 
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is required to publish 
notice of the award of the priority review voucher. FDA has determined 
that MIPLYFFA (arimoclomol), approved on September 20, 2024, 
manufactured by Zevra Denmark AS, meets the criteria for a priority 
review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cathryn Lee, Center for Drug 
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New 
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1394.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority 
review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease 
product application. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 
360ff), FDA will award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved 
rare pediatric disease product applications that meet certain criteria. 
FDA has determined that MIPLYFFA (arimoclomol), manufactured by Zevra 
Denmark AS, meets the criteria for a priority review voucher. MIPLYFFA 
(arimoclomol) is indicated for the treatment of adults and pediatric 
patients 2 years of age and older with Niemann-Pick disease type C.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority 
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529 
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/ForIndustry/DevelopingProductsforRareDiseasesConditions/RarePediatricDiseasePriorityVoucherProgram/default.htm. For further 
information about MIPLYFFA (arimoclomol), go to the ``Drugs@FDA'' 
website at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/.


[[Page 83021]]


    Dated: October 8, 2024.
Eric Flamm,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23646 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 19

- 10310 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.
CHRISTOPHER SANCHEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 1:07

- CR

- 36

- 1

Before SMITH, DENNIS, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Christopher Sanchez appeals the sentence imposed upon revocation of his supervised release. The district court varied upward from the advisory

range and sentenced Sanchez to 18 months of imprisonment and 18 months of supervised release. Sanchez contends that the district court committed procedural error by failing to provide an adequate explanation for the chosen

sentence

.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 4, 2019 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 19-10310 Document: 00515222223 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/04/2019No. 19

- 10310

2 Because Sanchez did not preserve this claim of procedural error for appeal by first raising it in the district court, plain error review applies. See
United States v. Whitelaw , 580 F.3d 256, 259, 261

- 62 (5th Cir. 2009). Sanchez acknowledges that plain error review applies under our precedent, but he wishes to preserve for further review the argument that an objection to the adequacy of the explanation of the sentence i s not required to preserve the

error. The record reflects that the district court implicitly considered Sanchez’s arguments for a lesser sentence and expressly stated that the chosen sentence addressed “the issues of adequate deterrence and protection of the public.” In

t he context of Sanchez’s case, the district court’s stated reasons are sufficient to show that it considered the arguments presented and had a reasoned basis for imposing an above

- range sentence. See id. at 261. Sanchez has not shown
clear or obvious error. AFFIRMED. Case: 19-10310 Document: 00515222223 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/04/2019
NOTE NO:

Her Britannic Majesty's Embassy presents its compliments to the Department 

of State and has the honour to refer to the UK/US Air Services Agreement 

between the Governments of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and 

Northern Ireland and the Government of the United States of America, signed 

at Bermuda on 23 July 1977, as amended.

Her Majesty’s Government hereby selects Dallas (in place of Orlando) as a 

US gateway point in column (C) on UK Route 9A in Section 3 of Annex 1 to 

the aforementioned Agreement, and designates Cayman Airways Limited to 

operate scheduled combination air services between the Cayman Islands and 

the above point on UK Route 9A. 

The Embassy avails itself of this opportunity to renew to the Department of 

State the assurance of its highest consideration.

BRITISH EMBASSY

Washington DC

 March 2012
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Ami James hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) the Amended Annual Report on Form 10-K of Quorum Corp. for the year ended June 30, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Quorum Corp.  Dated: October 14, 2015/s/ Ami JamesAmi JamesPresident, Secretary, Treasurer and Director(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)Quorum Corp.   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Quorum Corp. and will be retained by Quorum Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
(logo) LNR

           Partners, LLC

 

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

OF

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC

 

 

The undersigned, Job Warshaw, being the President of LNR Partners, LLC (the "Special Servicer"), as special servicer under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement for the transactions listed on Schedule I hereto, hereby certifies, subject to any limitations listed on Schedule I hereto, as of the date hereof, on behalf of the Special Servicer, solely in his capacity as an authorized officer of the Special Servicer and not in his individual capacity, as follows:

 

1. A review of the activities performed by the Special Servicer during the period commencing on January 1, 2015 and ending on December 31, 2015 (or any other shorter period set forth on Schedule I hereto) (the “Reporting Period"), and of the Special Servicer's performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision; and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review and using the applicable servicing criteria under Item 1122 of Regulation AB, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

LNR PARTNERS, LLC,

a Florida limited liability company

  

By: /s/ Job Warshaw

Job Warshaw

President

 

 

Dated: February 23, 2016

 

 

1601 Washington Avenue · Suite 700 · Miami Beach, Florida 33139-3164

Telephone: (305) 695-5600 · Fax: (305) 695-5601

 

 

Schedule I

 

 

WFRBS 2012-C9

RBS Commercial Funding Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C9

 

 

Fitch Ratings Inc.

33 Whitehall Street

Attention: Commercial Mortgaged Surveillance

New York NY 10004

General Contact

 

Moody's Investors Service, Inc.

7 World Trade Center

250 Greenwich Street

Attn: Commercial Mortgage Surveillance Group

New York NY 10007

General Contact

 

Morningstar Structured Credit Ratings

1065 Avenue of the Americas, 33rd Floor

New York NY 10018

Mary Chamberlain

 

RBS Commercial Funding Inc.,

 

Tejal Wadhwani

 

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.,

McKenna Long & Albridge LLP

303 Peachtree Road, Suite 5300

Atlanta GA 30308

Patrick McGeehan

 

U.S. Bank, National Association

US Bank Global Structured Finance

MK-IL-SL7R

190 S. LaSalle St., 7th Floor

Chicago IL 60603

Edward Przybycien

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. 

9062 Old Annapolis Road 

Columbia MD 21045 

Group Notices
**EXHIBIT 31.02**

**Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)Certifications**

I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of ML Chesapeake FuturesAccess LLC, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of ML Chesapeake FuturesAccess LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)  Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation,of internal control over financial reporting to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: November 14, 2007                       |
|-----------------------------------------------|
|                                          |
| By                                            | /s/ BARBRA E.  KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra E. Kocsis                              |
| Chief Financial  Officer                      |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |

 

----
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Northrop Grumman Corporation ) ) Under Contract No. F33657-0l-C-4600 

### etal. ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT:

APPEARANCES FORTHE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59562
Terry L. Albertson, Esq. Stephen J. McBrady, Esq.

Crowell & Moring LLP Washington DC E. Michael Chiaparas, Esq.

DCMA ChiefTrial Attorney Carol L. Matsunaga, Esq.

Senior Trial Attorney Defense Contract Management Agency Carson, CA ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 6 September 2017

Administrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59562, Appeal ofNorthrop Grumman Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 4117-013]

      ( print page 82604)    
On August 26, 2019, as supplemented on October 17, 2019, and December 19, 2019, The Metropolitan District filed an application for surrender of license for the 3-megawatt Colebrook Hydroelectric Project No. 4117, located on the West Branch of the Farmington River in Litchfield County, Connecticut. On July 11, 2024, The Metropolitan District filed a notice of withdrawal of its application.

                    No motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal has been filed, and the Commission has taken no action to disallow the withdrawal. Pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,[1]                                          the withdrawal of the surrender application became effective on July 26, 2024, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.                

Dated: October 4, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 385.216(b) (2024).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-23520 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
SHARE

# Comparative chemical and structural analyses of two uranium dioxide fuel pellets...

Show authors

by Tyler L Spano,Antonio Simonetti,Loretta Corcoran,Philip Smith,Stefanie R. Lewis,Peter Burns

February, 2019

View DOI Listing

## Abstract

A comparative investigation of the trace element, U and Pb isotopic compositions, and structural attributes of two uranium dioxide fuel pellets was conducted for nuclear forensic applications. One fuel pellet consists of natural UO2 (0.71% 235U), while the other contains enriched UO2 (3.98% 235U). Numerous impurities, including transition metals, lanthanides, and main group elements were detected in both fuel pellets with total trace element contents that vary between 9.77 and 11.37 μg/g. The relative abundances of the transition metal impurities in the natural UO2 fuel pellet are linked to the source U ore and provide important insights into its provenance. X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy was utilized to investigate and compare the macro-(cm)-scale distribution of impurities within each of the fuel pellets. In addition, structural properties of the fuel pellets were examined using powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) and Raman and infrared spectroscopy. Differences in the intensity of the T2g U-O stretching vibrational mode were observed in the Raman spectra of the fuel pellets. Pb isotope ratios were investigated to potentially differentiate between the natural and enriched UO2 samples and are linked to the process history of these materials.

## Researchers

Tyler L  Spano

## Organizations

National Security Sciences Directorate

Nuclear Nonproliferation Division

Nuclear Security Advanced Technologies
#### Ilana Stanger, Appellant, v M & T Pretzel, Inc., Respondent.

[772 NYS2d 571]

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated December 6, 2002, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and dismissed the complaint.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The defendant established its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff, an experienced ice skater, voluntarily continued to skate despite the alleged defective condition of the skating rink surface, and thus assumed the risk *(see Morgan v State of New York,*90 NY2d 471 [1997]; *Rensing v Iceland, Inc.,*276 AD2d 614 [2000]; *Lo Piccolo v Town of Oyster Bay, Dept. of Parks,*260 AD2d 606 [1999]; *Byrne v Westchester County,*178 AD2d 575 [1991]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Therefore, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

The plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. S. Miller, J.P., Luciano, Adams and Cozier, JJ., concur.