alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                     W Scott  Aaron                                            

### 

## Contact

aaronws@ornl.gov

## Publications

##   Stable Isotope Enrichment Capabilities at ORNL...

July, 2013

##   Preparative Scale Mass Spectrometry:  A Modernized Electromagnetic Isotope Separator...

June, 2013

##   A CYCLOTRON CONCEPT TO SUPPORT ISOTOPE PRODUCTION FOR SCIENCE AND MEDICAL APPLICATIONS...

February, 2013

##   ENRICHED STABLE ISOTOPE TARGET PREPARATION AT THE OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY...

February, 2013

##   Development of Advanced Cermet Waste Forms...

November, 2011

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

View All

## Key Links

ORCID

Oak Ridge National Laboratory				1 Bethel Valley Road				Oak Ridge, TN 37830

(+1) 865.576.7658

#### Connect With Us

                                  -  Partnerships 
                                  -  Visit 
                                  -  Contact 

#### News

                                  -  Newsroom 
                                  -  Newsletter Signup 
                                  -  Media Contacts 

#### Research

                                  -  Science Areas 
                                  -  User Facilities 
                                  -  Centers & Institutes 

#### Resources

                                  -  Internal Users 
                                  -  Directory 

                                  -  Privacy 
                                  -  Accessibility/508 
                                  -  Nondiscrimination/1557 
                                  -  Vulnerability Disclosure Program
Exhibit 32.1      CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002    I, Marinus Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Pacific Software, Inc. (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.     Date:  February 17, 2009  /s/ Marinus Jellema Marinus Jellema, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Pacific Software, Inc. and will be retained by Pacific Software, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
"Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor")
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of October 18, 2012 among the Servicer and Sponsor,
American Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2012-4 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2013, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 31stday of May, 2013.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                    | 
| | ---------------------------------------------------- | 
| | Paul C. Honda                                        | 
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary               | 
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report of IndependentRegistered Public Accounting Firm**

 

To the Board of Directors, PNCFinancial Services Group, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement’s assertion, included in the accompanying Report on Assessmentof Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria, that Midland LoanServices, a division of PNC Bank, National Association (“Midland”or the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth inItem 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for alltransactions serviced on the *Enterprise!* Loan Management System (the“Platform”), as of December 31, 2016 and for the year then ended, excludingcriteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i)(B), 1122(d)(3)(i)(C), 1122(d)(3)(i)(D),1122(d)(3)(ii), 1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), and 1122(d)(4)(xv), which theCompany has determined are not applicable to the servicing activities performedby it with respect to the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conductedin accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company AccountingOversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a testbasis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicableservicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considerednecessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selectedasset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing ofselected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whetherthe Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selectedactivities in compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedureswere limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed bythe Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were notdesigned to detect noncompliance arising from errors that may have occurredprior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances oramounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by thisreport. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for ouropinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on theCompany’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’sassertion that Midland complied with the aforementioned applicable servicingcriteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 for the Platform isfairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

February 17, 2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP,1100 Walnut Street, Suite 1300, Kansas City, MO 64106*

*T: (816) 472 7921, F: (816)218 1890 www.pwc.com/us*

* *
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 14366.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 24, 1931.

T. T. Thompson, of Clarksville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for manufacturing intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

This judgment' was affirmed at a previous day of this term, apparently without observation of the fact that the record contained no notice of appeal. No statement of facts was then on file, and the judgment was affirmed for lack of showing of error upon the trial. .

Without the giving.of notice of appeal and the entry of that fact, in accordance with the statute (Code Cr. Proc. 1925, art. 827), upon the minutes of the trial court, this court is without jurisdiction. Appellant filed in the court below a motion for new trial, but, if any order was ever made thereon, it does not appear in * the record. Nor did appellant give any notice of appeal in connection with his sentence.

The judgment of affirmance will be withdrawn, and the appeal will be dismissed because this court is without jurisdiction; no notice of appeal having been given.

The appeal is dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Bruce D. Given, M.D.Bruce D. Given, M.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of
the Company as of and for the period covered by this Report.
 Date: August 14, 2009
    
    /s/ Theodore S. GreenName:
    
    Theodore S. GreenTitle:
    
    Co-Chief Executive Officer and
Interim Chief Financial OfficerDate: August 14, 2009
    
    /s/ Malcolm BirdName:
    
    Malcolm BirdTitle:
    
    Co-Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 23.1

















Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors of Alon USA Partners GP, LLC and


Unitholders of Alon USA Partners, LP:


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-183671) on Form S-1 of Alon USA Partners, LP of our reports dated March 13, 2013 , with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Alon USA Partners, LP and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of operations,  partners' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, which report appears in the December 31, 2012 annual report on Form 10-K of Alon USA Partners, LP.





/s/ KPMG LLP


Dallas, Texas


March 13, 2013
Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 IMH SECURED LOAN FUND, LLCBy:
    
    Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc.Its:
    
    ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Shane Albers

Shane Albers 

Chief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Steven Darak

Steven Darak 

Chief Financial OfficerDated: May 15, 2009
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, byand among Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Custodian, Certificate Administrator,Certificate Registrar and Authenticating Agent, Midland Loan Services, adivision of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, SitusHoldings, LLC, as Trust Advisor, and  U.S. Bank, National Association asTrustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series2012-C6 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein nototherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 13.9 ofthe Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial MortgageServices do hereby certify that:

 

1.  A review of theactivities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.  To the best of myknowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|------------------------|------------------------------------|
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7297

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

TYRONE DARNELL BUTLER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge.

(CR-01-272, CA-03-996-AW; CA-03-1077-AW)

Submitted: February 23, 2004 Decided: March 10, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone Darnell Butler, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Laurie Simms, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Darnell Butler seeks to appeal the district

court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in

a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Butler has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 8, 2017

No. 04-16-00754-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF BABY V.,

From the 408th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016-PA-00239

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an appeal from an order terminating appellant’s parental rights. Appellant 

filed his brief on January 5, 2017. Therefore, appellee’s brief was due January 25, 2017. 

No appellee’s brief, however, has been filed. This appeal will be set “at issue” in ten 

days. If appellee’s brief and a written response stating a reasonable explanation for failing 

to timely file the brief is not filed within ten days, this appeal will be set for submission 

without an appellee’s brief.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 8th day of February, 2017.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 99.1
 ENCORE ENERGY PARTNERS LP
 RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
 Three months ended March 31,2010
    
    
    2009Income before income taxes
    
    $
    17,439
    
    
    $
    2,077Adjustments:Add fixed charges:Interest expense
    
    
    3,359
    
    
    
    2,216Rental expense attributable to interest
    
    
    99
    
    
    
    88Total fixed charges
    
    
    3,458
    
    
    
    2,304Adjusted earnings
    
    $
    20,897
    
    
    $
    4,381Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    6.0
    
    
    
    1.9
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 4531

_____________________________
J OSHUA B RIAN N IBBELINK ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffecti ve Assistance of Appellate Counsel

— Original Jurisdiction.

June 28, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

W ETHERELL , R OWE , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________
N ot final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Joshua Brian Nibbelink, pro se
, Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
#### Swazee, Appellant, vs. Lee, Administratrix, Respondent.

*April 2*

May *8, 1951.*

*137For the appellant there were briefs by *Zillmer & Redjord*of Milwaukee, and oral argument by *John M. Redjord.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Brazeau & Bra-zeau,*attorneys, and *Richard S. Brazeau*of counsel, all of Wisconsin Rapids, and oral argument by *Theo. W\ Brazeau.*

Brown, J.

It is not necessary to create a trust by written instrument but where it is alleged that a trust is created by parol the evidence concerning the creation and the terms of the trust must be clear and convincing. *Hartman v. Loverud*(1938), 227 Wis. 6, 277 N. W. 641. In a trial to the court findings of fact will not be set aside on appeal unless they are contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. *Lerner v. Lerner*(1948), 252 Wis. 87, 31 N. W. (2d) 208; *Ische v. Ische*(1948), 252 Wis. 250, 31 N. W. (2d) 607. The learned trial court here specifically found:

> “8. That there was at no time created or established a trust of which plaintiff was a beneficiary or had any interest.”

Its conclusion of law was:

> “3. That the plaintiff never had any interest in said funds contingent or otherwise.”

The judgment dismissed the complaint on the merits.

We have examined the evidence and are agreed that the quantity and quality of plaintiff’s proof is not clear and convincing and the great weight and preponderance of the evidence is not in accord with his contention that the fund was to be his upon the death of his mother. Other questions raised thus become immaterial. The learned trial court’s finding, ante, must be sustained and its judgment affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
# L_2011241EN.01002601.xml

| 17.9.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 241/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 241/26

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 929/2011

of 16 September 2011

on the issue of import licences for applications lodged during the first seven days of September 2011 under the tariff quota opened by Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 for poultrymeat

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1301/2006 of 31 August 2006 laying down common rules for the administration of import tariff quotas for agricultural products managed by a system of import licences (2), and in particular Article 7(2) thereof,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 of 26 November 2007 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 774/94 as regards opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas for poultrymeat (3), and in particular Article 5(6) thereof,

Whereas:

The applications for import licences lodged during the first seven days of September 2011 for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2011 relate, for some quotas, to quantities exceeding those available. The extent to which import licences may be issued should therefore be determined by establishing the allocation coefficient to be applied to the quantities requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The quantities for which import licence applications have been lodged for the subperiod from 1 October to 31 December 2011 under Regulation (EC) No 1385/2007 shall be multiplied by the allocation coefficients set out in the Annex hereto.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 17 September 2011.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 238, 1.9.2006, p. 13.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 309, 27.11.2007, p. 47.

3

---

ANNEX

| Group No | Order No | Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.10.2011-31.12.2011
  (%) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 09.4410 | 0,358059 |
| 3 | 09.4412 | 0,414957 |
| 4 | 09.4420 | 0,425319 |
| 5 | 09.4421 | 10,752749 |
| 6 | 09.4422 | 0,431293 |

Group No

Order No

Allocation coefficient for import licence applications lodged for the subperiod from 1.10.2011-31.12.2011

(%)

1

09.4410

0,358059

3

09.4412

0,414957

4

09.4420

0,425319

5

09.4421

10,752749

6

09.4422

0,431293

---