alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SHARE

# Human-AI coworking

## New system combines human, artificial intelligence to improve experimentation

February 21, 2024

Yongtao Liu, R&D associate at ORNL's Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences. Credit: ORNL, U.S. Dept. of Energy

Though artificial intelligence decreases human error in experimentation, human experts outperform AI when identifying causation or working with small data sets. 

To capitalize on AI and researcher strengths, ORNL scientists, in collaboration with colleagues at National Cheng Kung University, Taiwan, and the University of Tennessee, Knoxville, developed a human-AI collaboration recommender system for improved experimentation performance. 

During experiments, the system’s machine learning algorithms, described in *npj Computational Materials*, display preliminary observations for human review. Researchers vote on data, telling the AI to show similar information or change direction, akin to a streaming service generating suggested content based on users’ activity. After initial guidance, algorithms improve to illuminate relevant data with little human input.

This graphic depicts the workflow of the human-AI collaborator system developed at ORNL to improve experimentation. Credit: Arpan Biswas and Rama Vasudevan/ORNL, U.S. Dept. of Energy

“The foundation of this research is basically not the quantity of the data but the quality of the data that we are aiming for,” ORNL’s Arpan Biswas said.

The experiments and autonomous workflows were supported by the DOE-funded Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, and algorithm development was supported by the DOE-funded MLExchange project to expand machine learning development at national laboratories. —** ***Alexandra DeMarco*

### Media Contact

### Contact

coffmanke@ornl.gov

865.341.3553

## Researchers

Arpan  Biswas

Yongtao  Liu

Rama K  Vasudevan

## Organizations

User Facilities

Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences

Theory & Computation Section

Data NanoAnalytics Group

Computing and Computational Sciences Directorate

Computational Sciences and Engineering Division

Advanced Computing Methods for Physical Sciences Section

Computational Chemistry and Nanomaterials Sciences Group

Physical Sciences Directorate

## Related News

Artificial Intelligence

Machine Learning
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-23-00560-CV

IN RE De Andre HARRINGTON

Original Proceeding1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 5, 2023

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On June 1, 2023, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. Relator also filed a motion 

to stay the underlying proceeding pending final resolution of the petition for writ of mandamus. 

After considering the petition and this record, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the 

relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See TEX.R. APP. P. 52.8(a). 

Relator’s motion to stay is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2022-CI-05165, styled In the Interest of K.J.E., a Child, pending in the 

225th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Christine Vasquez-Hortick presiding.
### R e q u e s t f

o r I n f o r m a t i o n ­ F A

A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 3 3 6

9

­ A W A

­ A V S

­ 3 3 3 E x e m p t i o n s ( F A

A )

S e n t : T h u r s d a y , A u g u s t 1 3

, 2 0 1 5 2 : 4 5 P M

T o : r w g o o d w

y n @ g m a i l

. c o m C c : N g o , D a n ( F A A )

A u g u s t 1 3

, 2 0 1 5

D e a r M r

. G o o d w y n :

T h i s l e t t e r i s t o i n f

o r m y o u t h a t t h e f

o l l o w i n g i n f o r m a t i o n i s m i s s i n g f

r o m y o u r p e t i t i o n ( D o c k e t N o

. F A A

­ 2 0 1 5

­ 2 3 3 6 )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n i s n e c e s s a r y f

o r t h e F e d e r a l A v i a t i o n A d m i n i s t r a t i o n ( F A A ) t o p r o c e s s y o u r p e t i t i o n

.



###  D e s c r i b e t h e a i r c r a f

t m a k e ( s )

, m o d e l ( s )

, a n d t y p e ( s ) ( i

. e

. f i x e d w i n g
, r o t o r c r a f

t

, l i g h t e r

­ t h a n

­ a i r ) f

o r t h e p r o p o s e d U A S o p e r a t i o n

. T h e d e s c r i p t i o n ( s ) s h o u l d i n c l u d e

t h e m a x i m u m w e i g h t ( i n c l u d i n g p a y l o a d )

. T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n c a n b e l o c a t e d i n t h e

a i r c r a f t m a n u a l ( s )

.

P l e a s e s ub m i t t h e a d d i t i o n a l i n f o r m a t i o n ( n o n

­ p r o p r i e t a r y ) t o y o u r d o c k e t

a t w w w

. r e g u l a t i o n s

. g o v

. A n y a d d i t i o n a l c o n f i d e n t i a l / p r o p r i e t a r y m a t e r i a l s c a n b e e

­ m a i l e d

s e p a r a t e l y t o 3 3 3 e x e m p t i o n s @ f a a

. g o v

. I f y o u d o s e n d i n s u

p p l e m e n t a l d o c u m e n t s

s e p a r a t e l y , p l e a s e a d d a c o m m e n t o n t h e d o c k e t

, i n d i c a t i n g t h a t y o u s ub m i t t e d s u p p l e m e n t a l

i n f o r m a t i o n s e p a r a t e l y

.

I f y o u w a n t u s t o p r o c e s s y o u r r e q u e s t a n y f u r t h e r
, w e m u s t r e c e i v e t h e i n f

o r m a t i o n d e s c r i b e d a b o v e b y A u g u s t 2 7

, 2 0 1 5

. I f w e d o n o t r e c e i v e t h e i n f o r m a t i o n
, w e w i l l c l o s e t h e d o c k e t w i t h o u t n o t i f

y i n g y o u f u r t h e r

.

R e g a r d s
,

D a n N g o

F A A O f f i c e o f R u l e m a k i n g
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 12-302 Date: January 2012

Subject: New Requirement for Agencies’ Payments to the CSRDF in FY 2012 for VSIPs, 

VERAs Processing Costs per P.L. 112-74, the “Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2012”

PURPOSE 

The purpose of this letter is to notify you of the new statutory requirement for employing agencies 

to remit to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF) an amount equal to the 

Fiscal Year (FY) 2011 average unit cost of processing annuity cases if, any time during FY 2012 

(retroactively to October 1, 2011) an employee retires under a CSRS or FERS Voluntary Early 

Retirement Authority (VERA), or any other CSRS or FERS provision and receives a Voluntary 

Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP), or other form of monetary separation incentive (i.e., any 

form of buyout). The average unit cost of processing annuity cases under this requirement is 

calculated to be $107.62 per annuitant. 

BACKGROUND 

This new statutory requirement arose from Section 741 of Division C of the “Consolidated 

Appropriations Act, 2012,” Public Law 112-74, approved December 23, 2011. It contains the 

following: 

“SEC. 741. During fiscal year 2012, for each employee who 

 “(1) retires under section 8336(d)(2) or 8414(b)(l)(B) of title 5, United States Code, 

or 

 “(2) retires under any other provision of sub-chapter III of chapter 83 or chapter 

84 of such title 5 and receives a payment as an incentive to separate, the separating agency 

shall remit to the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund an amount equal to the 

Office of Personnel Management's average unit cost of processing a retirement claim for 

the preceding fiscal year. Such amounts shall be available until expended to the Office of 

Personnel Management and shall be deemed to be an administrative expense under section 

8348(a)(l)(B) of title 5, United States Code.”
.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 

A Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) providing further details on the method your agency will 

remit payment to OPM will be issued and posted on the OPM Web site in the next few weeks. 

If you have any further questions about this new requirement, please call on (202) 606-0606. You 

may also send email about this issue to FinancialBALs@opm.gov.

 

Emily Dean 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2919

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996

to extend the legislative authority for the Black Patriots Foundation

to establish a commemorative work.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JULY 25, 2000

Mr. CAMPBELL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

A BILL

To amend the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands Management Act of 1996 to extend the legislative authority

for the Black Patriots Foundation to establish a commemorative work.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. BLACK REVOLUTIONARY WAR PATRIOTS ME4 MORIAL.

5 Section 506 of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands

6 Management Act of 1996 (40 U.S.C. 1003 note; 110 Stat.
2

•S 2919 IS

1 4155) is amended by striking ‘‘2000’’ and inserting

2 ‘‘2002’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6115

ROBERT E. PLATSHORN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

JOHN HAHN, Warden, FCI, Petersburg; UNITED

STATES PAROLE COMMISSION,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert R. Merhige, Jr., Senior

District Judge. (CA-96-449)

Submitted: December 30, 1998 Decided: January 15, 1999

Before WILKINS and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Peter Buscemi, MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Debra Jean Prillaman, Assistant United States Attorney,

Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert E. Platshorn appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed

the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Platshorn v. Hahn, No. CA-96-449 (E.D. Va. Dec. 1, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2710

To recognize the rights of grandparents in cases involving international

parental kidnapping.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 9, 2000

Mr. THOMPSON (for himself and Mr. FRIST) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To recognize the rights of grandparents in cases involving

international parental kidnapping.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘International Parental

5 Kidnapping Grandparents’ Rights Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO PARENTAL KIDNAPPING LAW.

7 Section 1204 of title 18, United States Code, is

8 amended—

9 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting after ‘‘paren10 tal rights’’ the following: ‘‘or grandparental rights’’;
2

S 2710 IS

1 (2) in subsection (b)—

2 (A) in paragraph (1), by striking ‘‘and’’

3 after the semicolon;

4 (B) by redesignating paragraph (2) as

5 paragraph (3); and

6 (C) by inserting after paragraph (1), the

7 following:

8 ‘‘(2) the term ‘grandparental rights’ with re9 spect to a child, means visiting rights granted to a

10 grandparent, whether arising by operation of law,

11 court order, or legally binding agreement of the par12 ties; and’’; and

13 (3) in subsection (c)(1), by striking beginning

14 with ‘‘and was in effect’’ through the period and in15 serting ‘‘and the defendant is in compliance with

16 that order.’’.

Æ
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-21-00147-CV

In re Jennifer Jo Bird, individually, and as Former Trustee of the Carl C. Anderson, Sr. 

and Marie Jo Anderson Family Trust FBO Jennifer Jo Bird

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Thomas J. Baker, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Baker and Smith

Filed: September 10, 2021
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2822

For the relief of Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 29, 2000

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR DENES

4 AND GYORGYI FULOP.

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

7 Act, Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop shall be eligible for

8 issuance of immigrant visas or for adjustment of status

9 to that of aliens lawfully admitted for permanent residence

10 upon filing an application for issuance of immigrant visas

11 under section 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status

12 to lawful permanent resident.
2

•S 2822 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Denes Fulop or

2 Gyorgyi Fulop enters the United States before the filing

3 deadline specified in subsection (c), the alien shall be con4 sidered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall,

5 if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status

6 under section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

7 as of the date of enactment of this Act.

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of immigrant visas or the application

11 for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate fees

12 within 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act.

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.—

14 Upon the granting of immigrant visas or permanent resi15 dence to Denes and Gyorgyi Fulop, the Secretary of State

16 shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by the appro17 priate number, during the current or next following fiscal

18 year, the total number of immigrant visas that are made

19 available to natives of the country of the aliens’ birth

20 under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality

21 Act or, if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas

22 that are made available to natives of the country of the

23 aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


L\_2011136EN.01010501.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 24.5.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 136/105 |

---

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EU) No 494/2011 of 20 May 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as regards Annex XVII (Cadmium)

(
[Official Journal of the European Union L 134 of 21 May 2011](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2011_134_R_TOC)
)

On page 3, Article 2, second subparagraph:

for:

‘It shall apply from 10 January 2012.’,

read:

‘It shall apply from 10 December 2011.’;

on page 4, point 1 of the Annex, paragraph 1, third subparagraph of the modified table:

for:

‘By way of derogation, the second subparagraph shall not apply to articles placed on the market before 10 January 2012.’,

read:

‘By way of derogation, the second subparagraph shall not apply to articles placed on the market before 10 December 2011.’;

on page 5, point 2 of the Annex, paragraph 11 of the modified table:

for:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘11. | By way of derogation, paragraph 10 shall not apply to articles placed on the market before 10 January 2012 and jewellery more than 50 years old on 10 January 2012.’, |

read:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| ‘11. | By way of derogation, paragraph 10 shall not apply to articles placed on the market before 10 December 2011 and jewellery more than 50 years old on 10 December 2011.’. |

---
Exhibit 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS


We hereby consent to the references to our firm in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 (including any amendments thereto, the “Annual Report”) filed by TXO Energy Partners, L.P. (the "Company"). We hereby further consent to the use and incorporation by reference of information from our report regarding those quantities estimated by us of reserves and the value of reserves as of December 31, 2022. In addition, we hereby consent to the inclusion of our summary report dated February 17, 2023 as an exhibit to the Annual Report.


CAWLEY, GILLESPIE & ASSOCIATES, INC.


Texas Registered Engineering Firm


/s/ W. Todd Brooker


__________________________________________W.  Todd Brooker, P.E.


President


Austin, Texas


March 31, 2023


|US-DOCS\140469107.1||
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTfit PR 06-0422 IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION OF STEPHEN J. HEGEDUS 

## FEB 2 2207) Bowen Greenwo,;,i Clerk of Supreme C. . .- 09ZtryERnter. . Stephen J.Hegedus haspetitionedtheCourt to waivethethree-yeartest requirement for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination (MPRE) for purposes of Hegedus's application for admission by motion to the State Bar of Montana. By rule, applicants for admission by motion must provide evidence of the requisite score on an MPRE taken within three years preceding the date ofthe application for admission. Rule VII.A.9, Rules ofAdmission. Hegedus passed the MPRE in 2014 when seeking admission to the practice of law in Michigan. Hegedus is currently admitted tothe State Bars ofArkansas, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Oklahoma, and Wisconsin. The petition states that Hegedus has practiced law "for four and a halfyears, without any ethical or disciplinary issues in anyjurisdiction where licensed." Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Stephen J. Hegedus to waive the three-year test requirement for the MPRE for purposes of Hegedus's current application for admission by motion to the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. The Clerk shall mail a copy ofthis order to Petitioner and to the Administrator of the Board ofBar ExaminerNat the State Bar ofMontana.

z_cr DATED this day ofFebruary, 2022.
ChiefJustice 02/22/2022
Case Number: PR 06-0422

# AIL

ustices

2
Exhibit
32.2





Certification of Principal
Financial Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Plastron Acquisition Corp. II (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Rapp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael RappMichael
      Rapp
                            Principal
      Financial Officer
                            May 13,
    2009
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing VII, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Maurice C. Werdegar, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Maurice C. Werdegar


Maurice C. Werdegar


President and Chief Executive Officer


March 21, 2014
# L_2011066EN.01001701.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/17

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 242/2011

of 11 March 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Chleb prądnicki (PGI))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Chleb prądnicki’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Poland’s application to register the name ‘Chleb prądnicki’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection under Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 187, 10.7.2010, p. 16.

2

---

ANNEX

Foodstuffs listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 510/2006:

Class 2.4:   Bread, pastry, cakes, confectionery, biscuits and other baker’s wares

POLAND

Chleb prądnicki (PGI)

---