alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 


PROMISSORY NOTE PAYABLE


FOR VALUE RECEIVED, Entest Biomedical,
Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Debtor’) , hereby promises to pay to the order of Regen Biopharma, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
the sum of Two Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty Two ($2,222 ) Dollars, together with simple interest thereon at the rate of 10 %
per annum on the unpaid balance. Said sum shall be paid in the manner following:


Principal and/or accrued interest
due hereunder shall be due and Payable , in whole or in part, at the demand of the Holder. This Note may be assigned to any third
party, in whole or in part, at the sole option of Regen Biopharma, Inc. or any Holder in due course.


This Note shall be governed
by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.
Each of the Debtor and the Holder and any Holder in due course hereby submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States
Federal and state courts located in San Diego , California with respect to any dispute arising under this Note.


 


Signed and sealed under penalty of perjury this 6th day
of June, 2014.


 


ENTEST BIOMEDICAL INC.


By: /s/David Koos


Its:CEO


 


ACCEPTED BY REGEN BIOPHARMA INC.


By: /s/David Koos


Its: CEO
Exhibit 10.2







AMENDMENT TO NOTE PAYABLE TERMS


August 8, 2014







THIS AGREEMENT (the “Agreement”) is made effective as of August 4, 2014, by and between Hydrocarb Energy Corporation (HECC), a Nevada corporation with corporate office located at 800 Gessner, Suite 375, Houston, Texas 77024 (the “Company”), and SMDRE LLC (“SMDRE”), a Texas Limited Liability Company, together referred to hereafter as the “Parties”.







Whereas, SMDRE has an outstanding Note Payable to the Company for $1,859,879 that became due on August 4, 2014; and whereas such note is unsecured and the board of directors of the Company have directed the Executive Chairman to negotiate an extension for the note to be paid giving the company a better chance to collect the note; and







Based also on an extension request letter from SMDRE, the terms of the outstanding Note Payable are hereby amended to be:


 


	
Principal Amount:

	
$1,859,879

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
Plus Extension Fee:

	
$50,000

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	
New Face amount of Note:

	
$1,909,879

	
 










New Due Dates:







$   750,000 due by December 31, 2014


$1,159,879 due by March 31, 2015







Other Terms:







Should an up listing happen prior to the above due dates, all sums are due 60 days after an up listing to either the NYSE MKT or the NASDAQ stock exchanges.












As evidenced by the signatures hereunder the parties agree.







 



	
SMDRE LLC

	
Hydrocarb Energy Corporation


	
 

	
 


	
 

	
 


	
Clifton E. Stanley

	
Kent P. Watts


	
Managing Member

	
Executive Chairman
| (1)   | the                  Amended quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Suberta Resources                  Inc. for                  the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements                  of                  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the                  information contained in the Amended quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A                  for                  the quarter ended June 30, 2007, fairly presents in all material                  respects,                  the financial condition and results of operations of Suberta Resources                  Inc. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   By: |   /s/                  Kelly Sundberg                                                              |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:     |  Kelly                  Sundberg                                                                        |
|  Title:    |  Principal                  Executive Officer,Principal                  Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:     |  September                  17, 2007                                                                    |
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing VII, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin D. Eng, Chief Financial Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Martin D. Eng





Martin D. Eng


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial Officer)


March 14, 2019
[No. 24546-9-II.

Division Two.

December 21, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Clint Troy Garrison, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 98-1-02747-1, Rudolph J. Tollefson, J., entered March 31, 1999. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Bridgewater, J.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ALEJANDRO HERNANDEZ,

 Appellant,

v.

LAURA PORTER,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-12-00111-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2011-1222) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

summary judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below.

It appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court 

makes no other order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 31ST DAY OF JULY, 2013.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
# L_2014294DE.01005001.xml

| 10.10.2014 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 294/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2014

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 294/50

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 84/2011 des Rates vom 31. Januar 2011 zur Änderung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 765/2006 über restriktive Maßnahmen gegen Präsident Lukaschenko und verschiedene belarussische Amtsträger

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 28 vom 2. Februar 2011
  )

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 28 vom 2. Februar 2011

Auf Seite 17, im vierten Erwägungsgrund:

anstatt:

| „(4) | In Anbetracht der spezifischen Bedrohung für den internationalen Frieden und die internationale Sicherheit in der Region, die von der Situation in Belarus ausgeht, und zur Wahrung der Übereinstimmung mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2011/69/GASP sollte die Befugnis zur Änderung der Listen in den Anhängen I und IA dieser Verordnung vom Rat ausgeübt werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(4)

In Anbetracht der spezifischen Bedrohung für den internationalen Frieden und die internationale Sicherheit in der Region, die von der Situation in Belarus ausgeht, und zur Wahrung der Übereinstimmung mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2011/69/GASP sollte die Befugnis zur Änderung der Listen in den Anhängen I und IA dieser Verordnung vom Rat ausgeübt werden.“

muss es heißen:

| „(4) | In Anbetracht der spezifischen Bedrohung für den internationalen Frieden und die internationale Sicherheit, die von der Situation in Belarus ausgeht, und zur Wahrung der Übereinstimmung mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2011/69/GASP sollte die Befugnis zur Änderung der Listen in den Anhängen I und IA dieser Verordnung vom Rat ausgeübt werden.“ |
| --- | --- |

„(4)

In Anbetracht der spezifischen Bedrohung für den internationalen Frieden und die internationale Sicherheit, die von der Situation in Belarus ausgeht, und zur Wahrung der Übereinstimmung mit dem Verfahren zur Änderung und Überprüfung des Anhangs des Beschlusses 2011/69/GASP sollte die Befugnis zur Änderung der Listen in den Anhängen I und IA dieser Verordnung vom Rat ausgeübt werden.“

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3627 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3627

  To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to exclude from eligibility for the 
generalized system of preferences any country that fails to effectively 
enforce its environmental laws or meet its international environmental 
                  obligations, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2015

  Mr. Doggett (for himself, Mr. Levin, Mr. Rangel, Mr. McDermott, Mr. 
Lewis, Mr. Neal, Mr. Becerra, Mr. Thompson of California, Mr. Larson of 
 Connecticut, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Kind, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Crowley, Mr. 
Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Ms. Linda T. Sanchez of California, and Ms. 
    Bass) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Trade Act of 1974 to exclude from eligibility for the 
generalized system of preferences any country that fails to effectively 
enforce its environmental laws or meet its international environmental 
                  obligations, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Earth Act''.

SEC. 2. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS.

    Section 502(b)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2462(b)(2)) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting after subparagraph (H) the following new 
        subparagraph:
                    ``(I) Such country fails to effectively enforce its 
                environmental laws, regulations, or other measures, or 
                to fulfill its international environmental obligations, 
                including as such obligations relate to public 
                health.''; and
            (2) in the matter following subparagraph (I) (as added by 
        paragraph (1))--
                    (A) by striking ``and (H)'' and inserting ``(H)''; 
                and
                    (B) by striking ``shall not prevent'' and inserting 
                ``, and (I) shall not prevent''.
                                 <all>
```
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  By:    |  /s/ Kelly Sundberg                                                   |
|--------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Name:  |  Kelly Sundberg                                                       |
|  Title: |  Principal Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and Director |
|  Date:  |  February 16, 2010                                                    |
##### 



Exhibit 8.1
 
  
    (1)
    
    common units representing limited partner interests in the Partnership (the Common Units);(2)
    
    debt securities, which may be co-issued by Calumet Finance in one or more series, consisting
of notes, debentures or other evidences of indebtedness (the Debt Securities); and(3)
    
    guarantees (the Guarantees) of the Debt Securities by certain subsidiaries of the
Partnership listed in the Registration Statement as guarantors (the Subsidiary Guarantors)
    Very truly yours,/s/ VINSON & ELKINS L.L.P.Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. Vinson & Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai
Houston London Moscow New York Shanghai Tokyo Washington
    
    First City Tower, 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2300, Houston, TX 77002-6760Tel713.758.2222 Fax713.758.2346 www.velaw.com
# L_2011218EN.01001901.xml

| 24.8.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 218/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 218/19

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 851/2011

of 23 August 2011

withdrawing the suspension of submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (‘Single CMO’ Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 891/2009 of 25 September 2009 opening and providing for the administration of certain Community tariff quotas in the sugar sector (2), and in particular Article 5(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4380 were suspended as from 20 July 2011 by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 698/2011 of 19 July 2011 suspending submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas (3), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Submission of applications for import licences concerning order number 09.4380 were suspended as from 20 July 2011 by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 698/2011 of 19 July 2011 suspending submission of applications for import licences for sugar products under certain tariff quotas (3), in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 891/2009.

| (2) | Following notifications on unused and/or partly used licences, quantities became available again for that order number. The suspension of applications should therefore be withdrawn, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Following notifications on unused and/or partly used licences, quantities became available again for that order number. The suspension of applications should therefore be withdrawn,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The suspension laid down by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 698/2011 of submission of applications for import licences for order number 09.4380 as from 20 July 2011 is withdrawn.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 23 August 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

José Manuel SILVA RODRÍGUEZ

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 254, 26.9.2009, p. 82.

2

(3)  
  OJ L 189, 20.7.2011, p. 12.

3

---
Exhibit 31.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



I, Pierric Senay, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports
on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust
2012-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);



2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports,
taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;



3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange
Act periodic reports;



4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement
required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and



5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing
criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act
Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.



In giving the certifications above, I have
reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Citibank, N.A.



Date: March 18, 2016



| | By: | /s/ Pierric Senay                                            
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Name: Pierric Senay                                          
| |     | Title:  President and Secretary                              
| |     | (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-40344 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSUE GUZMAN-GUTIERREZ, also known as Josque Guzman-Gutierrez, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-01-CR-825-ALL

-------------------- September 24, 2002 Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Josue Guzman-Gutierrez appeals his sentence with respect to the imposition of a three-year term of supervised release following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.No. 02-40344 -2- Guzman-Gutierrez acknowledges that his argument was rejected by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United
States , 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey , 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). This argument is foreclosed because Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres
. See Apprendi , 530 U.S. at 489-90, 496; United States v. Dabeit , 231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied , 121 S. Ct. 1214 (2001). Guzman-Gutierrez also argues that the district court committed error during the plea colloquy by advising him that he was subject to a maximum of one year of supervised release. Guzman-Gutierrez does not seek to withdraw his plea, but he wants his sentence reformed to reflect one year of supervised release. The Government concedes the error and also urges the court to reform the judgment of conviction. See United States v. Glinsey , 209 F.3d 386, 394-96 (5th Cir.) cert. denied , 531 U.S. 919, 394 (2000). Guzman-Gutierrez’s term of supervised release is MODIFIED to
one year. The conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
***Exhibit 32***

 

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the reporton Form 10-Q of Abakan Inc. for the quarterly period ended August 31, 2011, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, RobertH.Miller, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuantto §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledgeand belief:

 

(1)  This report fully complies withthe requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)  The information contained in thisreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition ofthe registrant at the end of the period covered by this report and results ofoperations of the registrant for the period covered by this report.

 

Date: October ­24, 2011

 

 

/s/ Robert H. Miller

Robert H. Miller, ChiefExecutive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

This certificationaccompanies this report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 andshall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, bedeemed filed by the registrant for the purposes of §18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended. This certification shall not be incorporatedby reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, orthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or afterthe date of this report), irrespective of any general incorporation languagecontained in such filing.

 

----