alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 June 26, 2007
 O. I. CORPORATION
  Oklahoma
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    0-6511
(Commission File Number)
    
    73-0728053
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 151 Graham Road, P.O. Box 9010, College Station, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77842-9010
(Zip Code)
  
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 4.01 Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant.
    Item 9.01  Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d) Exhibits




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  O. I. CORPORATION
Date: July 2, 2007By:
    /s/ J. Bruce LancasterJ. Bruce Lancaster,Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



Exhibit Index
**Exhibit
      32**











**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of JJ&R Ventures, Inc. a Nevada
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ending June
      30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
      Deborah Flores, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











Date:
      August 8,
      2007                                                                                           
/s/ Deborah
      Flores


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








I, Jon Pexton, Chief Financial Officer of UserTesting, Inc. (the “Company”), do hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2021 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated: March 4, 2022





UserTesting, Inc.By:/s/ Jon PextonName:Jon PextonTitle:Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
-   

# Fusion Energy Division

## **Harnessing the power of the sun**

Experts in the Fusion Energy Division (FED) are pursuing the understanding and the associated technology required to deploy economical fusion energy systems. Through domestic and international efforts, these scientists and engineers are developing the physics basis for creating and sustaining plasmas at temperatures hotter than the sun, delivering next-generation fusion materials that can withstand this extreme environment, and pursuing technologies for efficient fuel production and energy extraction.  

Using state-of-the-art theory and modeling coupled with advanced measurement techniques and experimental analysis, the division is building a foundation for sustaining burning plasmas, a key milestone for fusion research that will be demonstrated in ITER. This includes developing the capability for long-pulse, high-performance operation while ensuring adequate power exhaust and particle control.  

Alongside that, they’re creating the subsystems that will be needed to turn a burning plasma into a commercial nuclear plant: fuel cycle and power extraction; approaches for heating, fueling, and controlling plasmas; advanced engineering systems; and ways to remotely monitor and control the devices. 

FED is also providing the research needed to develop and deploy the Material Plasma Exposure eXperiment (MPEX)—a next-generation linear plasma device that will be built at ORNL. MPEX will support the study of the way plasma will interact long term with materials within future fusion reactors. The division also leads the Department of Energy’s Innovation Network for Fusion Energy program (INFUSE), which is focused on driving cost-effective fusion energy technologies through private-public research partnerships. The division also hosts the Virtual Technology Laboratory (VLT) which supports the fusion science community in enabling technologies to advance plasma science experiments and pursue innovative solutions for materials and technologies needed for realizing fusion energy.

Fusion energy is a low-risk, environmentally friendly water-derived energy source that has tremendous potential to dramatically change how we power the world. When that happens, the work of ORNL’s Fusion Energy Division will have played a crucial part.

Now is an exciting time for fusion energy research in the U.S. At ORNL, the Fusion Energy Division has been growing rapidly, and is tackling some of the most challenging and impactful problems in fusion energy development. We are bringing expertise in fusion technology and physics together, to understand and optimize the full fusion system.

### Contact

PhilB Snyder

snyderpb@ornl.gov

## Sections

View a hi-res version of this image

Read More

View a hi-res version of this image

Read More
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National American University Holdings,
Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or person performing the equivalent
functions):
    /s/ Ronald ShapeRonald L. Shape, Ed. D.Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82611-82612]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23586]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

[Notice--C0A-2024-01; Docket No. 2024-0002; Sequence No 43]


Office of Human Resources Management; SES Performance Review 
Board

AGENCY: Office of Human Resources Management (OHRM), General Services 
Administration (GSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 82612]]

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of new members to 
the GSA Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board. The 
Performance Review Board assures consistency, stability, and 
objectivity in the performance appraisal process.

DATES: Applicable: October 11, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Nathaniel Williams, Acting 
Director, Executive Resources Division, Office of Human Resources 
Management, GSA, 1800 F Street NW, Washington, DC 20405, or via 
telephone at (571) 513-9451.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of title 5 
U.S.C requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulation 
prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one or more SES 
performance review board(s). The board is responsible for making 
recommendations to the appointing and awarding authority on the 
performance appraisal ratings and performance awards for employees in 
the Senior Executive Service.
    The following have been designated as members of the Performance 
Review Board of GSA:
    <bullet> Katy Kale, Deputy Administrator--PRB Chair.
    <bullet> Christopher Bennethum, Assistant Commissioner for Assisted 
Acquisition Services, Federal Acquisition Service.
    <bullet> Lesley Briante, Associate Chief Information Officer of 
Digital Management, Office of GSA IT.
    <bullet> Aluanda Drain, Associate Administrator for Civil Rights, 
Office of Civil Rights.
    <bullet> Andrew Heller, Deputy Commissioner for Enterprise 
Strategy, Public Buildings Service.
    <bullet> Arron Helm, Chief Human Capital Officer, Office of Human 
Resources Management.
    <bullet> Dena McLaughlin, Executive Director, Catalog and 
Solicitation Management Program Management Office, Federal Acquisition 
Service.
    <bullet> Tanisha Palermo, Regional Commissioner, Public Buildings 
Service, Rocky Mountain Region.
    <bullet> Flavio Peres, Assistant Commissioner for Real Property 
Disposition, Public Buildings Service.
    <bullet> Camille Sabbakhan, Deputy General Counsel, Office of the 
General Counsel.

Robin Carnahan,
Administrator, General Services Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-23586 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-FM-P
EXHIBIT
32.1




WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350




In
connection with Quarterly Report of Lihua International, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the “Report”), the undersigned, Jianhua Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      November 15, 2010
                        By:
                        /s/
      Jianhua ZhuName:
                        Jianhua
      ZhuTitle:
                        Chief
      Executive
Officer
# Materials and Chemistry

### Contact

AndrewJ Miskowiec

miskowiecaj@ornl.gov
Exhibit 32.2




Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Security Agency Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Kuykendall, Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:




/s/John D. Kuykendall


John D. Kuykendall


Chief Financial Officer




August 16, 2010
#### PRICE v. STATE.

No. 16198.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 25, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1933.

Wallace Malone, of Port Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being three years in the penitentiary.

• No statement of facts is brought forward. The only bill of exception complains of the court’s action regarding a request for severance. It appears that in April, 1932, appellant filed a motion requesting that Henry O. Armstrong and J. B. Turner — separately indicted from each other and also from appellant — be tried first. The motion for severance is in compliance with the statute (see Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. art. 650 et seq.). No order on the motion was carried into the court minutes. It is recited in the bill that the “court made his notation upon the papers in this cause ‘granted.’ ” The cases against all the named parties were passed by the state at the April term of court. Prom the bill and the qualification thereon it also appears that, when this case was called for trial on the 10th day of January, 1933, appellant’s motion for severance was among the papers in the case, but was not again called to the court’s attention, and, if appellant ob*769jected to then going to trial before the other parties were tried, the record fails to show it. The court says in his qualification that the attorney for Turner in April, 1932, also filed a motion for severance requesting that appellant and Armstrong he tried before Turner; that Armstrong filed no motion for severance but that he was never in court available for trial in January when appellant was tried, and was not available for trial until the second day of February, at which time he was convicted and given a suspended sentence. Under the circumstances, we think no reversible error is shown.

The judgment is affirmed.
No. 12-15-00082-CR

DAVID MARK DAVIS II

v. 

STATE OF TEXAS

§

§ 

§ 

§ 

§ 

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH JUDICIAL REGION

TYLER, TEXAS

APPELLANT'S NOTICE OF CHANGE OF MAILING ADDRESS

Appellant, David Mark Davis II, files this notice of change of mailing address with the clerk 

of the court. 

1) Appellant’s current mailing address should be changed to:

David Mark Davis II 

PO Box 530908 

Harlingen, Texas 78553 

2) Appellant’s physical address has not changed and should remain 905 N. Loop 499, Apt.

525; Harlingen, Texas 78550.

Respectfully Submitted,

David Mark Davis II 

Appellant, Pro Se 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that at the time of filing, a copy of the foregoing Notice was served on The State 

of Texas through counsel of record, Mr. Ed Jones, by email to ejones@angelinacounty.net. 

_________________________ 

 David Mark Davis II 

ACCEPTED

12-15-00082-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

11/13/2015 3:17:39 PM

Pam Estes

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 11/13/2015 3:17:39 PM PAM ESTES Clerk
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-2589

THOMAS W. FURLOW, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge. (CA98-2394-CCB) Submitted: March 23, 2000 Decided: March 29, 2000 Before LUTTIG, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas W. Furlow, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Anemojanis Holton, Jeffrey Ronald Meyer, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Thomas W. Furlow, Jr., appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for reconsideration of the August 23, 1999 order, which directed that the government issue him a refund of $742 for the 1997 tax year and denied Furlow’s motion to reconsider the court’s July 6, 1999 order granting summary judgment in favor of the government as to Furlow’s claimed refund for the 1996 tax year. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinionand find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Furlow v. United States , No. CA98-2394-CCB (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1999). To the extent that Furlow seeks review of the orders of July 6 and December 22, 1999, those orders are not properly before this court. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### In the Matter of Lawrence C. Jones, Appellant, v New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation et al., Respondents.

[773 NYS2d 552]

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered July 9, 2002, which granted respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the petition for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The petition, which admits that petitioner had lateness and absenteeism problems while on disciplinary probation, on its face shows a good faith basis for petitioner’s termination, requiring dismissal of the petition *(see Matter of Wilson v Bratton,*266 AD2d 140, 142 [1999], citing *Matter of Butler v Abate,*204 AD2d 171, 172 [1994]). The effect of such admission of good faith is not negated by petitioner’s other allegations purporting to show bad faith *(Matter of Morgan v Safir,*281 AD2d 376 [2001], *lv denied*97 NY2d 601 [2001]). Concur—Nardelli, J.P., Tom, Andrias, Saxe and Marlow, JJ.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 USC, SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

          In connection with the quarterly report of Amiworld, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the six month period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

 

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Rule 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

| Dated: August 13, 2008 | s/Ingrely Veitia___________________ |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|

|   | Ingrely Veitia, Chief Financial Officer |
|--------|-----------------------------------------|
#### Gateway Glass Company, Appellant, vs. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, Respondent.

*October 7*

November *3, 1953.*

For the appellant the cause was submitted on the briefs of *Lees & Bunge*of La Crosse.

For the respondent there was a brief by the *Attorney General*and *Stewart G. Honeck,*deputy attorney general, and *119
      *Beatrice Lampert,*assistant attorney general, and oral argument by *Mrs. Lampert.*

Gehl, J.

For the reasons stated in *Wisconsin E. R. Board v. Gateway Glass Co.,*ante, p. 114, 60 N. W. (2d) 768, the judgment is affirmed.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.
#### State ex rel. Witte, Appellant, vs. Board of Election Commissioners of the City of Milwaukee, Respondent.

*September 10*

October *9, 1956.*

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by *Martin J. Torphy*of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by *Walter J. Matti-son,*city attorney, and *Peter M. Stupar,*assistant city attorney, and oral argument by *Mr. Stupar.*

Fairchild, C. J.

This case was argued and submitted with the case of *State ex rel. McIntyre v. Board of Election Comm.,*ante, p. 395, 78 N. W. (2d) 752, and is ruled by the decision therein.

*By the Court.*— Judgment affirmed.

Currie and Steinle, JJ., dissent.
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ James P. DolanJames P. DolanChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pacific Software, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Bruce Thomsen, President of the Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant.  August 10, 2010  /s/ Bruce Thomsen Bruce Thomsen Principal Executive Officer Principal Accounting Officer  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.