alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## State of N ew York Su p reme C ou rt, A p p ellate Division Third J u dicial Dep artment Decided and Entered: April 21, 2016 521428

________________________________ In the Matter of the Claim of FRANK C. SARSON, Appellant. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

________________________________ Calendar Date: February 23, 2016 Before: Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ.

__________ Frank C. Sarson, Albany, appellant pro se. Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, New York City (Bessie Bazile of counsel), for respondent.

__________ Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed August 8, 2014, which ruled, among other things, that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Substantial evidence supports the decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board finding that claimant, a utility worker with a food service company, lost his employment due to misconduct (see Matter of Shafer [Commissioner of Labor], 107 AD3d 1280, 1280 [2013]). The record establishes that claimant was discharged from his employment following an investigation by the employer into complaints that he made racial slurs to a coworker, which was in violation of a known policy of the employer. "It is well settled that violating a known policy of an employer can constitute disqualifying misconduct . . ., as can offensive behavior in the workplace (Matter of Manno-2- 521428

[Commissioner of Labor], 8 AD3d 869, 869 [2004]; see Matter of Rivers [Federation Empl. & Guidance Serv.–Commissioner of Labor], 44 AD3d 1191, 1192 [2007]; Matter of Sarmiento [Newsday, Inc.– Commissioner of Labor, 287 AD2d 851, 852 [2001]). Although claimant denied making any racial remarks, this presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve (see Matter of Mulea [Commissioner of Labor], 23 AD3d 753, 754 [2005]). Furthermore, given that claimant indicated on his application for unemployment insurance benefits that he was discharged due to lack of work, the Board's finding that claimant made a willful false statement to obtain benefits and its imposition of recoverable overpayments of benefits will not be disturbed (see Matter of Campon [Commissioner of Labor], 122 AD3d 1228, 1229 [2014]). Peters, P.J., McCarthy, Egan Jr. and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 285 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 285

   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to restore the link 
 between the maximum amount of earnings by blind individuals permitted 
without demonstrating ability to engage in substantial gainful activity 
 and the exempt amount permitted in determining excess earnings under 
                           the earnings test.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 21, 1999

  Mr. McCain (for himself, Mr. DeWine, Ms. Landrieu, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
   Cleland, Mr. Hagel, Mr. Wellstone, and Mr. Breaux) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to restore the link 
 between the maximum amount of earnings by blind individuals permitted 
without demonstrating ability to engage in substantial gainful activity 
 and the exempt amount permitted in determining excess earnings under 
                           the earnings test.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Blind Persons Earnings Equity Act''.

SEC. 2. RESTORATION OF LINK BETWEEN RULES RELATING TO SUBSTANTIAL 
              GAINFUL ACTIVITY FOR BLIND INDIVIDUALS AND RULES RELATING 
              TO EXCESS EARNINGS UNDER THE EARNINGS TEST.

    Section 223(d)(4)(A) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 
423(d)(4)(A)) is amended by striking the second sentence and inserting 
``No individual who is blind shall be regarded as having demonstrated 
an ability to engage in substantial gainful activity on the basis of 
earnings that do not exceed an amount equal to the exempt amount under 
section 203(f)(8) which is applicable to individuals described in 
subparagraph (D) thereof.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    The amendments made by this Act shall apply with respect to taxable 
years ending after 1998.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOHN L. COOPER, JR., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 203 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. JOHN L. COOPER, JR., Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 204 MAL 2015 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 19th day of August, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):February 11, 2008 (February 7, 2008)
 SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
  Delaware
    
    001-33556
    
    41-2232463(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission
    
    (IRS Employerincorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 5400 Westheimer Court, Houston, Texas
    
    77056(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 713-627-5400
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02 Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXPress Release    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02
    
    Results of Operations and Financial Condition
  
 Item 9.01
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (d)
    
    Exhibits99.1
    
    Press Release of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, dated February 7, 2008




---



##### Table of Contents



SPECTRA ENERGY PARTNERS, LPBy:
    
    Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP,its general partnerBy:
    
    Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC,its general partner/s/ Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Number
    
    Exhibit99.1
    
    Press Release of Spectra Energy Corp, dated February 7, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 276 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.276

                       One Hundred Sixth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

           Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,
             the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

                                 An Act

 
                    For the relief of Sergio Lozano.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SERGIO LOZANO.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding subsections (a) and (b) of section 
201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, Sergio Lozano shall be 
eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 
to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon 
filing an application for issuance of an immigrant visa under section 
204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent 
resident.
    (b) Adjustment of Status.--If Sergio Lozano enters the United 
States before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), he shall 
be considered to have entered and remained lawfully and shall, if 
otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment of status under section 
245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act as of the date of the 
enactment of this Act.
    (c) Deadline for Application and Payment of Fees.--Subsections (a) 
and (b) shall apply only if the application for issuance of an 
immigrant visa or the application for adjustment of status are filed 
with appropriate fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
    (d) Reduction of Immigrant Visa Number.--Upon the granting of an 
immigrant visa or permanent residence to Sergio Lozano, the Secretary 
of State shall instruct the proper officer to reduce by one, during the 
current or next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 
visas that are made available to natives of the country of the alien's 
birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act or, 
if applicable, the total number of immigrant visas that are made 
available to natives of the country of the alien's birth under section 
202(e) of such Act.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
#### BELT v. STATE.

No. 17194.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 30, 1935.

Everette B. Parks and Baskett & De Lee, all of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement' of facts or bills of exception. The exceptions to the court’s charge cannot be appraised in the absence of a statement of facts. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2288-057]

      ( print page 83006)    
In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) regulations, 18 CFR part 380, the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for license for the Gorham Hydroelectric Project, located on the Androscoggin River in Coos County, New Hampshire and has prepared a Final Environmental Assessment (FEA) for the project. No federal land is occupied by project works or located within the project boundary.

The FEA contains staff's analysis of the potential environmental impacts of the project and concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental protective measures, would not constitute a major Federal action that would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.

                    The Commission provides all interested persons with an opportunity to view and/or print the FEA via the internet through the Commission's Home Page (                    *http://www.ferc.gov/​*), using the “eLibrary” link. Enter the docket number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field, to access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at                     *FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov,*                     or toll-free at (866) 208-3676, or for TTY, (202) 502-8659.                

                    You may also register online at                     *https://ferconline.ferc.gov/​eSubscription.aspx*                     to be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.                

                    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Ryan Hansen at (202) 502-8074 or                     *ryan.hansen@ferc.gov.*

Dated: October 7, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2024-23670 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Lamar Marcell Hunter v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 895

- CR

Trial court case number: 12

- CR

- 1 92 1

Trial court: 1 0th District Court of Galveston County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court on March 24 , 201 5

. I n the abatement
order, we directed the trial court to execute an amended certification of appellant’s right to appeal

. The district clerk has filed a supplemental clerk’s record containing an amended certification of appellant’s right to appeal. Accordingly, w e REINSTATE this case on the

Court’s active docket.

Appellee’s brief, if any, is due to be filed no later than 30 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 7, 2015
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2769

To authorize funding for National Instant Criminal Background Check

System improvements.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 22, 2000

Mr. LEAHY (for himself, Mr. HATCH, Mr. ROBB, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. KOHL, Mr.

SCHUMER, and Mr. CLELAND) introduced the following bill; which was

read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To authorize funding for National Instant Criminal

Background Check System improvements.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘NICS Partnership Act

5 of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. NATIONAL INSTANT CRIMINAL BACKGROUND

7 CHECK SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS.

8 (a) AUTHORIZATION FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO

9 STATES SERVING AS POINTS OF CONTACT.—There are

10 authorized to be appropriated $40,000,000 for fiscal year
2

•S 2769 IS

1 2001, $50,000,000 for fiscal year 2002, and $60,000,000

2 for fiscal year 2003, to the Department of Justice to di3 rectly reimburse States for the reasonable costs necessary

4 to serve as points of contact for access to the National

5 Instant Criminal Background Check System established

6 under Public Law 103–159.

7 (b) REPORT ON REIMBURSEMENT FORMULA FOR

8 STATES SERVING AS POINTS OF CONTACT.—Not later

9 than 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the

10 Attorney General shall submit to the Committees on the

11 Judiciary of the Senate and the House of Representatives

12 a report on the appropriate formula for the direct reim13 bursement to States of the reasonable costs necessary to

14 serve as points of contact for access to the National In15 stant Criminal Background Check System established

16 under Public Law 103–159.

Æ
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00019-CV

STEVEN A. HAYES, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 158th District Court

of Denton County (F-2005-1603-B)

July 15, 2021

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Kerr

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment

is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By _/s/ Elizabeth Kerr__________________

 Justice Elizabeth Kerr
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 20, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1468 Lower Tribunal No. 19-16354

________________ 

### Greg Mirmelli , Appellant,
vs. 

### Sunset Harbour Yacht Club, Inc. ,

Appellee.
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Reemberto Diaz, Judge. Alexander Appellate Law, P.A., and Samuel Alexander (DeLand), for appellant. Horr, Novak & Skipp, P.A., and William R. Boeringer, for appellee. Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and SCALES, and GORDO, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
#### MURPHY v. BROADDUS COMMON SCHOOL DIST. NO. 26.

No. 3040.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Jan. 21, 1937.

W. T. Davis, of San Augustine, for appellant.

J. R. Bogard, of San Augustine, for ap-pellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This appeal is before us without brief by either party, and is, therefore, dismissed for want of prosecution.
#### Estate of Kessler: Anhalt and another, Appellants, vs. Estate of Kessler, Respondent.

*December 6, 1955*

January *10, 1956.*

*514For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by *Cyril D. Schatter*of Whitewater.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by *Robert H. Gottmar*of Baraboo.

Brown, J.

We find no case like this in the books but certain general principles are well established. To be valid, a trust requires that a beneficiary be named or designated. Sec. 231.11 (5), Stats.; *McHugh v. McCole*(1897), 97 Wis. 166, 72 N. W. 631. It is not necessary that the beneficiary exist or be ascertainable at the time the trust is created but he must be ascertainable within the time limited by the rule against perpetuities. Restatement, 1 Trusts, p. 288, sec. 112; 89 C. J. S., Trusts, p. 738, sec. 23 c.

The will announced that the testatix would designate the additional beneficiaries by a writing left with the will. She did not perform this condition either exactly or substantially and there is no evidence that she ever prepared or executed *515any such paper or even that she determined in her own mind the persons whom she wished to benefit. Mrs. Kessler also reserved to herself a power of appointment which, we think, she could exercise by an instrument kept separately from the will. Such a document, to be an effective exercise of the power, would have to be executed with the formalities required of a will. In this respect, also, the record not only fails to show the existence of such a' document but there is no evidence that one ever existed or that Mrs. Kessler ever reached a decision on the identity of the appointees. We conclude that the record does not support an assumption that the power of appointment was exercised.

We determine that for lack of identified or ascertainable beneficiaries other than Beuthin and the two Anhalts the attempt to create a valid trust, except in respect to them, by section 20 of the will has failed and the residue, except for that required to pay Beuthin and the Anhalts, remains property undisposed of by the will.

The executor’s final account has been approved. Time to distribute the estate in accordance with the terms of the will is at hand. Just as legatees are now entitled to have their legacies, so the heirs at law are entitled to have their share of the estate which is undisposed of by the will. To warrant withholding undisposed-of residue from them pending further information, we consider there should be evidence that the testatrix made a different disposition of it. All the evidence here is to the contrary. No one has come before the court claiming that he or any other identifiable person, existing now or in the future, is aggrieved by a distribution of the estate in regular course. Those who are entitled to take intestate property are certainly aggrieved by having their shares withheld without sufficient justification. On this record we conclude that the justification is not present.

*By the Court.*— Order and judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings conforming to the opinion.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report July 26, 2007
 Grant Prideco, Inc.
  Delaware
(State of Incorporation)
    
    001-15423
(Commission File No.)
    
    76-0312499
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 400 N. Sam Houston Pkwy. East, Suite 900
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    77060
(Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: (281) 878-8000




---



##### 



Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits.
 (c) Exhibits.
  SIGNATURE
  Grant Prideco, Inc.Date:  July 26, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Philip A. ChoycePhilip A. ChoyceVice President and General Counsel
#### HARTLESS v. STATE.

No. 18139.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1936.

D. L. Harry, of Jacksonville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.-

The law creating the offense for which this appellant was convicted has been repealed. Following Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W(2d) 481, the judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 31, 2007
 Pioneer Companies, Inc.
  Commission File Number 000-31230
 DELAWARE
(State or other jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or organization)
    
    06-1215192
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 700 LOUISIANA, SUITE 4300, HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Introductory Note
  Item 2.01
    
    Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets.
  Item 3.01
    
    Notice of Delisting or Failure to Satisfy a Continued Listing Rule or Standard; Transfer
of Listing
  Item 3.03
    
    Material Modification in Rights of Security Holders
  Item 5.01
    
    Changes in Control of Registrant
   2




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Principal Officers
  Item 8.01
    
    Other Events
  Item 9.01.
    
    Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (d)
    
    Exhibits
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press Release dated August 31, 2007.
 3




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
   PIONEER COMPANIES, INC.By:
    /s/ Gary L. PittmanSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer 4




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit Number
    
    Description99.1
    
    
    Press Release dated August 31, 2007.
 5