alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### State ex rel. Illges, Plaintiff, vs. Kopp, Circuit Judge, Defendant.

*January 14*

February *25, 1947.*

*33For the plaintiff there was a brief by *Cavanagh, Stephenson, Mittelstaed & Sheldon*of Kenosha, attorneys, and *R. Stanley Kelly*of Burlington, attorney for Louise Hamm, adminis-tratrix of the estate of John Hamm, and oral argument by *William A. Sheldon.*

For the defendant there was a brief by *Godfrey & Pfeil*of Elkhorn, and oral argument by *Alfred L. Godfrey.*

Rosenberry, C. J.

The question for determination here is whether the judgment entered by the trial court was entered in conformity with the mandate of this court filed on the 4th day of December, 1945, in the case of *Illges v. Congdon,*reported in 248 Wis. 85, 20 N. W. (2d) 722, 21 N. W. (2d) 647.

*34Upon consideration of the mandate, which is as follows: “Judgment reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion,” and the judgment * entered by the trial court on October 7, 1946, it is held that the judgment entered complied with the mandate of this court. However, subsequent proceedings are subject to review on a second appeal. The issues which were determined in the course of the subsequent proceedings cannot be reviewed or modified on an application for writ of *mandamus*to compel the circuit court to enter the proper judgment. Such matters can only be considered on the second appeal. The judgment of the trial court having been entered in conformity with the mandate, the petition of the relator must be dismissed.

The relator argues, in support of his contention that the judgment entered by the trial court was not in conformity with the mandate, that this court in considering the evidence upon the appeal in the case of *Illges v. Congdon, supra,*violated the due-process clause of the Fourteenth amendment to the constitution of .the United States for the reason that this court is without power to make findings of fact. This contention cannot be sustained and raises no question either under the constitution of the state of Wisconsin or the constitution of the United States.

*By the Court.*— The petition for writ of *mandamus*is denied upon the merits.

*

 The judgment is not set out in full because of its length, and for the further reason that it will be considered upon the second appeal now pending in this court.
# L_2011066EN.01002101.xml

| 12.3.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 66/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 66/21

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 244/2011

of 11 March 2011

entering a name in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (Pera de Lleida (PDO))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 of 20 March 2006 on the protection of geographical indications and designations of origin for agricultural products and foodstuffs (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 7(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pera de Lleida’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006, Spain’s application to register the name ‘Pera de Lleida’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no statement of objection pursuant to Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 11 March 2011.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Dacian CIOLOŞ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 12.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 192, 16.7.2010, p. 19.

2

---

ANNEX

Agricultural products intended for human consumption listed in Annex I to the Treaty:

Class 1.6.   Fruit, vegetables and cereals, fresh or processed

SPAIN

Pera de Lleida (PDO)

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of  Z3 Enterprises, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





3.  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.











Date:  November 22, 2010





By: /s/ Judson Bibb


------- -----------------


Judson Bibb


Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pzena InvestmentManagement, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2010,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Richard S.Pzena, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 4, 2010 | /s/  RICHARD S. PZENA             |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                        |                              |
|                        | Name:  Richard S. Pzena           |
|                        | Title:  *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
# L_2011313DE.01004802.xml

| 26.11.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 313/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 313/48

---

Berichtigung der Durchführungsrichtlinie 2011/48/EU der Kommission vom 15. April 2011 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme des Wirkstoffs Bromadiolon und zur Änderung der Entscheidung 2008/941/EG der Kommission

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 102 vom 16. April 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 102 vom 16. April 2011

Auf Seite 31, Anhang, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“, Teil A, erster Satz:

anstatt:

„Nur Anwendungen als Rodentizid in Form von vorbereiteten Ködern, die in speziell dafür gebauten Trichtern ausgelegt werden, dürfen zugelassen werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Nur Anwendungen als Rodentizid in Form von vorbereiteten Ködern, die in den Gangsystemen der Nagetiere ausgelegt werden, dürfen zugelassen werden.“

---
#### Wigchers, Administrator, Plaintiff and Appellant, vs. Landsaw and another, Defendants and Appellants: Thorp and another, Defendants and Respondents.*

*October 11*

December *15, 1948.*

For the appellant George Wigchers there was a brief by *Douglas & -Omernik*of Spooner, and oral argument by *Glenn R. Douglas.*

For the appellants Emma Mae Landsaw and Aetna Casualty & Surety Company there was a brief by *Doar & Knowles*of New Richmond, and oral argument by *W. T. Doar.*

For the respondents there was a brief by *Coe & Cameron*of Rice Lake, and oral argument by *William A. Cameron.*

*

 Motion for rehearing denied, without costs, on February 15, 1949.

Rosenberry. C. J.

For the reasons stated in the case of *Thorp v. Landsaw, ante,*p. 1, 35 N. W. (2d) 307, the judgment setting aside the verdict of the jury, which found the defendant Edwin Thorp causally negligent, and rendering judgment in favor of Edwin Thorp is reversed, and the cause remanded with directions to reinstate the verdict and render *12judgment thereon in favor of George Wigchers, administrator, against Edwin Thorp and the Metropolitan Casualty Insurance Company.

*By the Court.*— The judgment appealed from is reversed and the cause remanded with directions as stated in the opinion.

Broadfoot, J., took no part.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 199 (Tuesday, October 15, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82994]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23732]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION

[Docket No.: ED-2024-SCC-0112]


Consolidated Annual Report (CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins Career 
and Technical Education Act of 2006; Correction

AGENCY: Department of Education (ED), Office of Career, Technical, and 
Adult Education (OCTAE).

ACTION: Correction notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 11, 2024, the 60-day comment period published in 
the Federal Register (FRN Vol. 89, No. 176, pages 73638-9) for the 
proposed revised information collection, Consolidated Annual Report 
(CAR) for the Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 
2006, with an end date of November 12, 2024. An error was made to the 
Docket No.: ED-2024-SCC-0112 posting with the current instrument 
version of the Perkins V Consolidated Annual Report. Approximately two 
weeks after the publication on September 23, 2024, ED corrected this 
error and posted the correct version of the instrument, Perkins V 
Consolidated Annual Report 1830-0569 revision to the record. As a 
result, the Department is extending the public comment period two 
weeks. The new end date of the comment period is November 26, 2024.
    The PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance, Office of 
the Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy 
Development, hereby issues a correction notice as required by the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

    Dated: October 9, 2024.
Juliana Pearson,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and Clearance, Office of the 
Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2024-23732 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification

 

I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:

 

1.              I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2012-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.              Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.              Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.              I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and, based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement; and

 

5.              All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.

 
|                  | HARLEY-DAVIDSON   MOTORCYCLE TRUST 2012-1 |
|-----------------------|-------------------------------------------|
|                  |                                      |
|                  |                                      |
|                  | By:                                       | Harley-Davidson   Credit Corp.,   as Servicer |
|                  |                                      |   |
|                  | By:                                       | /s/   James Darrell Thomas |
|                  |                                      | James   Darrell Thomas |
|                  |                                      | Vice   President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |
|                  |                                      |
|                  |                                      |
| March 25,   2013 |                                      |

 

----
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA
No. 3 6 3 A1 4
11 June 2015 SANDHILL AMUSEMENTS, INC. and GIFT SURPLUS, LLC

v. SHERIFF OF ONSLOW COUNTY , NORTH CAROLINA, HANS J. MILLER , 1 in his official capacity; and DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE FOURTH PROSECUTORIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, ERNIE LEE, in his official capacity

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A

- 30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of
the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 7 62 S.E.2d 666 (201 4 ), affirming in part , vacating in part, and dismissing in part an appeal from order s e ntered on 4 November

201 3 by Judge J ack Jenkins in Superior Court, Onslow County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 21 April 2015

. Daughtry, Woodard, Lawrence & Starling, by Kelly K. Daughtry and Luther D. Starling , for plaintiff

- appellee Sandhill Amusements, Inc

. Hyler & Lopez, P.A., by Stephen P. Agan and George B. Hyler, Jr., for plaintiff

appellee Gift Surplus, LLC

. Turren tine Law Firm, PLLC, by S.C. Kitchen, and Lesley F. Moxley, Onslow County Attorney, for defend ant

- appellant Sheriff Hans J. Miller

. Edmond W. Caldwell, Jr., General Counsel for North Carolina Sheriffs’ Association, amicus curiae.

PER CURIAM.

1 Pursuant to N.C. R. App. P . 38, Hans J. Miller, who took office as Sheriff of Onslow County on December 1, 2014, replaced former defendant Ed Brown.S ANDHILL A MUSEMENTS , I NC

. V S HERIFF OF O NSLOW C NTY ., N.C.
Opinion of the Court

- 2

- For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of th e Court of Appeals is reversed. This case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Onslow County, for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Justice ERVIN did not participate in the consider ation or decision of this case.
**Exhibit 31.2****Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification**I, Robert C. Reeves, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Encore Energy Partners LP; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) [Omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 33-8238; 34-47986]  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: November 5, 2007 /s/ Robert C. Reeves   Robert C. Reeves   Senior Vice President, Chief FinancialOfficer, and
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported):
 November 8, 2007 (November 2, 2007)
 
 T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    000-19580
    
    76-0697390(State or Other Jurisdiction 
of Incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 7135 Ardmore
Houston, Texas 77054
 (Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
 (713) 996-4110
 (Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 5.03. Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year
    Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (d)
    
    Exhibits
 Exhibit 3.1
    
    T-3 Energy Services, Inc. Amendment to Bylaws
 2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
 Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
 T-3 ENERGY SERVICES, INC.Date: November 8, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Michael T. MinoMichael T. MinoChief Financial Officer and Vice President 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description3.1
    
    T-3 Energy Services, Inc. Amendment to Bylaws
 4
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23596]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS


Notice of Meeting

    Per 45 CFR chapter XXI section 2102.3, the next meeting of the U.S. 
Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for October 17, 2024, at 9:00 a.m. 
and will be held via online videoconference. Items of discussion may 
include buildings, infrastructure, parks, memorials, and public art.
    Draft agendas, the link to register for the online public meeting, 
and additional information regarding the Commission are available on 
our website: www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding the agenda, as well as 
any public testimony, should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, 
U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address; by emailing 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4d2e2b2c3e392c2b2b0d2e2b2c632a223b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a1c2c7c0d2d5c0c7c7e1c2c7c08fc6ced7">[email protected]</span></a>; or by calling 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring 
sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact 
the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.

    Dated October 4, 2024, in Washington, DC.
Zakiya N. Walters,
Administrative Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-23596 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) and accompanies the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Form 10-Q”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 of Blue Calypso, Inc. (the “Company”). I, David Polster, the Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify that, based on my knowledge: (1)The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods covered in this report. Date: August 14, 2012

   By:

   /s/ David S. PolsterName:

   David S. PolsterTitle:

   Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q pursuant to Item 601(b)(32) of Regulation S-K and Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and, accordingly, is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.