alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I,
Wayne A. Palladino, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:



|                         |  |                                                                               |  | 
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dated: November 13, 2008 |  | /s/ WAYNE A. PALLADINO Name: Wayne A. Palladino
Title:Chief Financial Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(1)
  BRISTOW
    GROUP INC.
    Letter to The Depository Trust Company Participants
    for Tender of All Outstanding
    71/2% Senior
    Notes due 2017
    in Exchange for Registered
    71/2% Senior
    Notes due 2017
  The exchange offer will expire at 5:00 p.m., New York
    City time,
    on          ,
    2007, unless sooner terminated or extended. Outstanding notes
    tendered in the exchange offer may be withdrawn at any time
    prior to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on the expiration
    date.
    1 2 1 2
      Form W-9
            
    any Exchange Notes received are being acquired in the ordinary
    course of business of the person receiving such Exchange Notes;
    such person does not have an arrangement or understanding with
    any person to participate in the distribution of the Outstanding
    Notes or the Exchange Notes within the meaning of the Securities
    Act;
    such person is not an affiliate, as defined in
    Rule 405 under the Securities Act, of Bristow, or if it is
    such an affiliate, it will comply with the registration and
    prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act to the
    extent applicable;
    if such person is not a broker-dealer, it is not engaged in, and
    does not intend to engage in, a distribution of Exchange Notes;
    if such person is a broker-dealer, it will receive Exchange
    Notes in exchange for Outstanding Notes that were acquired for
    its own account as a result of market-making activities or other
    trading activities, and it will deliver a prospectus in
    connection with any resale of such Exchange Notes; however, by
    so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, it will not be
    deemed to admit that it is an underwriter within the
    meaning of the Securities Act;




---



##### 




    if such person is a broker-dealer, it did not purchase the
    Outstanding Notes to be exchanged for the Exchange Notes from
    Bristow; and
    such person is not acting on behalf of any person who could not
    truthfully and completely make the foregoing representations.           2
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Helaine M. Kaplan,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the COMM2012-CCRE4 Mortgage Trust (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included inthe Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB

and Exchange ActRules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as Custodian, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer for the Emerald SquareMall Mortgage Loan, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, NationalAssociation, as Special Servicer for the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan,U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor for the Emerald Square MallMortgage Loan, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as ServicingFunction Participant for the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan, and NationalTax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the Emerald Square MallMortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: May 4, 2020

 

 

/s/ Helaine M. Kaplan

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
1 

### King, Melanie

Subject: FW: revised reg text TSD

Attachments: Reg Text TSD 28 May 2014 (Proposed Applic ability).docx; Reg Text TSD 28 May 2014

(Broad Applicability).docx

From: Culligan, Kevin

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 10:04 PM

To: 'Higgins, Cortney'

Subject: FW: revised reg text TSD

In my checking, it looks like I had not sent this version.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), Michael J. Barrist, Chief Executive Officer of NCO Group, Inc. (the Company), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008
(the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 16, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Michael J. Barrist 
|                   |  |  |  | Michael J. Barrist     
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
(logo) Rialto Capital

 

2014 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

 

                

Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of November 1, 2012 by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as successor Special Servicer to Torchlight Loan Services LLC, U.S. Bank National Association  as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor relating to the COMM 2012-CCRE4 Mortgage Trust, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates  **(COMM 2012-CCRE4)**

 

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.        All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.

 

2.        A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of October 6, 2014 to December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my supervision.

 

3.        To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.

 

 

 

 

Certified by:            /s/ Adam Singer                                                                                                      Date:  March 5, 2015

       Adam Singer, Managing Director
Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with the  Quarterly  Report of 4th Grade Films,  Inc.  (the
"Registrant")  on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ending  December 31, 2008, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Quarterly
Report"),  we, James Doolin and Shane  Thueson,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1) The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information  contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,  in
all material respects,  the financial  condition and result of operations of the
Registrant.


Date: 02/05/2009                /S/ JAMES DOOLIN
                                --------------------------------------------
                                James Doolin, President and Director

Date: 02/05/2009                /S/ SHANE THUESON
                                --------------------------------------------
                                Shane Thueson, Vice President and Director
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6107 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6107

**Commission Decision of 02/02/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6107 - PLATINUM EQUITY / NAMPAK PAPER HOLDINGS) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 2.2.2011

SG-Greffe(2011) D/1731

C(2011) 711 final

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6107 – PLATINUM EQUITY / NAMPAK PAPER HOLDINGS Notification of 21/12/2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 357, 30.01.2010, p.29

1. On 21/12/2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Platinum Equity Group ("Platinum", USA) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Nampak Paper Holdings Limited, ("Nampak Paper", UK), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nampak Holdings Plc., by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for undertaking Platinum : merger, acquisition and operation of companies active in a broad range of businesses, including information technology, telecommunications, logistics, metal services, manufacturing and distribution.

- for undertaking Nampak Paper: manufacture and supply of packaging.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(Signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    |                           | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| (2)    |       | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|                                                                                 |                   |                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Ilia                Lekach Chairman                and Chief Executive Officer  |                                                                                                   | Michael                LabinskiChief                Financial Officer  |
| November                10, 2008                                                     |                                                                                                   | November                10, 2008                                            |

----
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT 

_________________________________ 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

 Plaintiff - Appellee, 

v. 

DARRELL EUGENE WASHINGTON, 

 Defendant - Appellant. 

No. 16-4001 

(D.C. No. 1:02-CR-00034-DB-1) 

(D. Utah) 

_________________________________ 

ORDER

_________________________________ 

Before MATHESON, McKAY, and O’BRIEN, Circuit Judges. 

_________________________________ 

Darrell Eugene Washington appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for 

a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to the 

U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. But while this appeal was pending, the district court 

vacated Mr. Washington’s sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, rendering this appeal 

moot. See United States v. Moore, 83 F.3d 1231, 1235 (10th Cir. 1996) (when a 

sentence is vacated under § 2255, “the original sentence . . . is eviscerated”). We 

therefore grant Mr. Washington’s motion to dismiss. 

 We grant Mr. Washington’s motion to proceed on appeal without prepayment 

of costs or fees. The relevant statute, 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(1), does not permit litigants to 

avoid payment of filing and docketing fees, only prepayment of those fees. Although we 

FILED 

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit 

November 3, 2016

Elisabeth A. Shumaker 

Clerk of Court
2 

have dismissed this appeal, Mr. Washington remains obligated to pay all filing and 

docketing fees. He is directed to pay the fees in full to the clerk of the district court. 

Entered for the Court 

Monroe G. McKay 

Circuit Judge
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6568 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JERMEER MARSHALL,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Norman K. Moon, District Judge.

(CR-00-60; CA-03-358-7)

Submitted: August 25, 2005 Decided: September 2, 2005

Before TRAXLER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jermeer Marshall, Appellant Pro Se. Ray B. Fitzgerald, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Jermeer Marshall seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion to reconsider a prior order denying relief

on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken

from the final order in a habeas proceeding unless a circuit

justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(1) (2000); Reid v. Angelone, 369 F.3d 363, 370 (4th Cir.

2004) (applying the certificate of appealability requirement to

appellate review of the denial of a Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion).

A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed

by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of

a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his

constitutional claims is debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003);

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d

676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the

record and conclude that Marshall has not made the requisite

showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
- 3 -

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED February 7, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-40205 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JORGE LEONEL ALONSO-LOPEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:05-CR-1246-ALL

-------------------- Before REAVLEY, JOLLY, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Jorge Leonel Alonso-Lopez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States , 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |   |   |                                                            |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date: January 14, 2013 |   |   |   | /s/ Robert Knight                                               |
|                   |   |   |   | Robert Knight                                                   |
|                   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer and Acting Principal Accounting Officer |

----

----