alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TRUE PEOPLE OF AMERICA v. SMITH et al.

No. 10380.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

April 8, 1937.

R. D. Evans, of Waco, for appellant.

Sam G. Croom, of Houston, for appel-lees.

CODY, Justice.

This cause was not reported by a stenographer. Judgment was rendered in the court below on May 16, 1935. Appellant’s attorney, who resides in Waco, forwarded to appellees’ attorney, who resides in Houston, a copy of his proposed statement of facts on July 8, 1935, which was received while appellees’ attorney was out of town engaged in the trial of another case, and did not therefore come to his attention until July 12th. At the same time appellant’s attorney also sent to the judge before whom the case was tried two other copies of his proposed statement of facts, informing the judge that he had' sent a copy to opposing counsel, with the request to sign and return to the judge, but that if he did not do so, then he, appellant’s counsel, was presenting the statement under his separate certificate, and requested the judge to approve it, so it could be filed in the Court of Civil Appeals by the 14th. Appellees’ attorney, on July 12th, wrote the judge, complaining strenuously of the proposed statement, and suggested that he and appellant’s counsel meet with the judge and iron out their differences as to the evidence adduced on the trial. Before the judge had received this letter, he had approved the statement thus certified to by appellant’s attorney. Neither the original nor the copy of this statement was filed in the trial court. The judge has certified that he signed and approved the statement because of appellant’s attorney’s advice to him that it had to be filed not later than July 14th; but that it does not accurately reflect the evidence is incomplete and misleading in many particulars, and omits the entire evidence of several witnesses, and details the respects in which it is inaccurate and incomplete.

It is unnecessary to state that the statement certified to by appellant’s counsel and approved by the judge, but which opposing counsel had no opportunity to object to, is not such a statement as is contemplated by the statute (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 2243) that shall serve as a statement of facts in an appellate court. Appellant’s attorney seeks to justify this extraordinary procedure on the ground that he had not time in which to comply with the statutory requirements. The basis for his conclusion that he did not have such time seems to us to be inadequate. There were also sent up with this certified statement certain exhibits which formed no part of it when approved by the judge. Appellees have moved that this statement of facts be stricken from the record. We have no alternative but to grant the motion. The statement appears on its face to be an ex parte statement of the facts proved on the trial, and the trial judge has certified to *323its inaccuracy and incompleteness. No error appearing of record, the judgment of the trial court will he affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6073 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6073

**Commission Decision of 14/02/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6073 - DAIMLER / BEIQI FOTON MOTOR CO / BEIJING FOTON DAIMLER AUTOMOTIVE CO) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 14.2.2011

SG-Greffe(2011) D/2226, 2227

C(2011) 1014 final

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying parties:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6073 - DAIMLER/ BEIQI FOTON MOTOR CO/ BEIJING FOTON DAIMLER AUTOMOTIVE CO Notification of 12.021.2011 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C22, 22.01.2011, p.20

1. On 12.01.2011 the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which Daimler AG ("Daimler", Germany) and Beiqi Foton Motor Co. Ltd. ("Foton", China), acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation joint control of Beijing Foton Daimler Automotive Co. Ltd. ("BFDA") by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- For Daimler: development, manufacture and distribution of automobiles (cars, trucks, vans, buses and commercial vehicles); provision of automotive financial services including financing, leasing, insurance and fleet management,

- For Foton: development, manufacture and distribution of commercial vehicles,

- For BFDA: development, manufacture and distribution of medium-duty and heavy-duty trucks in China,

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(a) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
### The HONORABLE STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, United States Distric t 1 

### Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2470

___________ Leonard A. Tucker, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. United States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 28, 1997 Filed: April 25, 1997

___________ Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Leonard T ucker pleaded guilty to to using or carrying a firear m during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, in violation of 1 8 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1). He did not appeal, but filed the instant 28 U.S.C . § 2255 motion contend ing that this conviction is invalid under Bailey v. United Sta tes , 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). The district court denied relief, 1 and Tucker appeals. Assu ming this claim is even cognizable under § 2255, it i s pro cedurallydefaulted. Tucker cannot show cause or prejudice for thi s default because, in pleading guilty, he stipulated that he was carrying a concealed firearm on his person while committing a drug

### -2-

trafficking crime. A ccordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Willis , 89 F.3d 1371, 1378-79 (8th Cir.), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 273 (1996) ; United States v. White , 81 F.3d 80, 83 (8th Cir. 1996). Tucker's motion for appointment of counsel is denied. A true copy. Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
#### GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, Appellant, v. M. E. MALLETT et al., Appellees.

No. 3513.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

June 29, 1939.

John H. Land, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Howth, Adams & Hart, of Beaumont, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

This case originated in County Court of Jefferson County, at Law, Jefferson County, and was by appellant, General Motors Acceptance Corporation, against appellee, M. E. Mallett, on a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien against a Chevrolet automobile. We have carefully reviewed appellant’s propositions; finding no error, the judgment of the lower- court is affirmed without written opinion. Texas & New Orleans R. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.6Certification     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title18 of the United States Code), the undersigned officer of Foothills Resources, Inc. (the “Company”)does hereby certify with respect to the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-KSB for the periodended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) that: 1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.        Date:  August 1, 2007 By:  W. Kirk Bosché    Name:  W. Kirk Bosché    Title:  Chief Financial Officer        The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) andis not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTER

U. S. Office of Personnel Management

Number: P-98-05 Date: May 15, 1998 

Subject: Agency Per Capita Contributions

 Annual Revenue Confirmation Reports

 

AGENCY PER CAPITA CONTRIBUTIONS

We want to remind you of the requirement to remit monies to the Civil Service

Retirement and Disability Fund (CSRDF) by September 1, 1998, per the Federal Workforce

Restructuring Act of 1994 (P.L. 103-226). As we apprised you in Payroll Office Letter 94-3,

P.L. 103-226 requires employing agencies to remit $80 to the CSRDF for each employee

covered by the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) or the Federal Employees

Retirement System (FERS) as of March 31, 1998. This marks the final year for the per

capita contribution; there is no pending legislation to 

extend this requirement to future years.

All remittances must be made by Online Payment and Collection (OPAC). On the day you

OPAC the money, please FAX the supporting schedule attached. It is important that the total

shown on the schedule agrees with the amount of your OPAC transfer. If you do not have

access to OPAC, we ask that you mail your check with the supporting schedule to: 

 

 

Office of Personnel Management

 Attn: Funds Management Branch

 Post Office Box 7125 

 Washington, DC 20044

ANNUAL REVENUE CONFIRMATION REPORTS

In Financial Management Letter F-96-5, dated August 23, 1996, we advised all agency Chief

Financial Officers of a new reporting requirement, the Annual Revenue Confirmation Report

(ARC). This report was required to be submitted to OPM no later than May 1, 1997. 

However, after reviewing these reports and conferring with our independent public

accountant, we decided to take a more comprehensive approach. Annual Revenue

Confirmation Reports are no longer required. We will be issuing a Financial

Management Letter regarding alternative oversight measures in the near future.
Please direct inquiries on this matter to us on (202) 606-0666; our fax number is (202) 606-

7944, or send us an email, finance@opm.gov.

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service
Name 

(please print) 

MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 

AIR AND RADIATION MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION 

MOE 

PUBLIC HEARING CONCERNING STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (SIP)
 

Implementation, Maintenance, and Enforcement of the
 

2008 8-hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard SIP
 

December 21,2012
 

Signature 

NO 

Organization or 

Affiliation 

Address Do You 

Wish To 

Testify? 

How did you 

find out about 

this hearing? 

C~t (11\ eVlde ~, " 

-
#### DERRICK v. STATE.

No. 16794.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 16, 1934.

Seb Caídwell, of Mt. Pleasant, for appellant. .

Lloyd W. Davidson,' State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of a horse is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The facts heard in the trial court are not brought up for review. No fault has been *871perceived in the indictment or in the manner of its presentation.

In the absence of the evidence which was before the trial judge at the time of the trial, this court is unable to appraise the complaints of the court’s charge or the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



(TEPPCO LOGO)Login toInvestor Service Direct® atwww.melloninvestor.com/isd to enroll onlineorComplete and sign this paper form and mail in thecourtesy envelope provided to:Mellon Investor ServicesP.O. Box 358035, Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8035
 Enrollment Form for
 Investor ID:[Investor ID]
Account Key:[Account Key]
    
    To review your tax status, update your address, make account changes, or sign up for
MLinkSM for secure 24/7 online access to your financial documents, please visit
www.melloninvestor.com/ISD.[Address line 1][Address line 2][Address line 3]
    
    Please provide the following contact information:[Address line 4]
    
    Daytime phone[Address line 5]
    
    (o o o)    o o o -o o o[Address line 6]
 TEPPCO Partners, L.P. Distribution Reinvestment Plan
 TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
  1. Distribution Options (Leave this section blank to continue distribution reinvestment
options currently in place.)
 TEPPCO Partners, L.P.
 o Full Distribution Reinvestment.Please apply the distributions on all units that I currently own as well as all future units that I acquire.o Partial Distribution Reinvestment.Please remit to me the distribution on units. I understand that the
distribution on my remaining units, as well as all future units that I acquire, will be
reinvested under the Plan.
 more>




---



##### 



2. Safekeeping of Certificates
   o Please accept the enclosed certificate(s) for deposit to my account.Enclosed are  certificates.(Total number)
 Certificate number
    
    
    Number of UnitsTotal Units
 3. Account Authorization Signature
 My/Our signature(s) below indicates I/we have read the Prospectus and agree to the terms
therein and herein.
 Signature of Owner
    
    
    
    Date(month / day / year)Signature of Joint Owner
    
    
    
    Date(month / day / year)
# L_2011234DE.01004801.xml

| 10.9.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 234/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.9.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 234/48

---

Berichtigung der Verordnung (EU) Nr. 109/2011 der Kommission vom 27. Januar 2011 zur Durchführung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 661/2009 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates über die Typgenehmigung bestimmter Klassen von Kraftfahrzeugen und ihrer Anhänger hinsichtlich der Spritzschutzsysteme

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 34 vom 9. Februar 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 34 vom 9. Februar 2011

In Anhang IV, Nummer 0.1, erster Satz:

anstatt:

„... mit Spritzschutzvorrichtungen ausgestattet ...“

muss es heißen:

„... mit Spritzschutzsystemen ausgestattet ...“.

---
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  July 20, 2007
    /s/   THOMAS W. POWELLThomas W. PowellChairman and Chief Executive Officer 28
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pop Starz Records, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Adam Wasserman
                                        ------------------
                                        Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer

April 29, 2009

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
“Frontier’s novel architecture is ideally suited for 

delivering unprecedented machine learning 

and data science insights and automations that 

could vastly improve our understanding of 

critical processes.”

Doug Kothe,

Associate Laboratory Director, Computing

and Computational Sciences

Exascale is the next level of computing performance. By solving calculations more than five times faster than today’s top supercomputers—

exceeding a quintillion, or a billion billion, calculations per second—exascale systems will enable scientists to develop critically needed 

technologies for energy, medicine, materials, and more. The Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) 

is home to America’s first exascale system, the 2 exaflops HPE Cray EX Frontier supercomputer.

• enhance nuclear reactor efficiency and safety by modeling their entire life span;

• uncover the underlying genetics of disease;

• discover patterns in patient data for precision medicine; and

• further integrate artificial intelligence with data analytics, modeling, and simulation.

2

exaflops

Theoretical peak

performance 

700 PB 

2 

pickup trucks

Equal the weight

of one Frontier

cabinet

2

basketball courts

Frontier covers

over 7,300

square feet 

CONTACT:

Gina Tourassi

Director

National Center for

Computational Sciences

tourassig@ornl.gov,

865-576-4829

One Bethel Valley Road,

Oak Ridge, TN 37830

www.ornl.gov

August 2022

Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by 

UT-Battelle LLC for the US Department of Energy

Frontier’s storage system 

holds 33 times the 

amount of data in

the Library

of Congress

Frontier: America’s Exascale 

Computing Future

If each person on Earth completed one calculation per second, it would take more than 4 years to do 

what Frontier can do in 1 second. 

Unprecedented Power for New Knowledge

ORNL has decades of experience in the delivery and operation of world-leading 

supercomputers for scientific discovery. Since 2006, the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing 

Facility has deployed four supercomputers that debuted as fastest in the world, including 

Summit in 2018. In May 2022, Frontier came online as the first exascale machine in the world. Its 

power will help researchers answer problems of national importance that cannot be addressed 

on existing supercomputing platforms, such as: 

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
##### 



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 (Date of earliest event reported)
 Torch Energy Royalty Trust
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    1-12474
    
    74-6411424(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
 Rodney Square North
1100 North Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware 19890  (Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)
 302/636-6016  (Registrants telephone number, including area code)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 8.01.    Other Events.
 Trust Trustee Producer Gatherer Second Amendment Section 3.1 Agreement
 Producer shall pay Gatherer a fee of $0.53 per barrel for gathering, separation
and disposal of water until Trust terminates, at which point Producer shall pay
Gatherer a fee of $1.00 per barrel for gathering, separation and disposal of
water.
   Cautionary Statement on Risks Associated with the Trusts Forward-Looking Statements.
  Item 9.01.    Financial Statements and Exhibits
  99.1
    
    Second Amendment to Water Gathering and Disposal Agreement, by and among Robinsons Bend
Operating Company, LLC, a Delaware company, successor in interest to Torch Energy Associates,
Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, and Everlast Energy LLC, a Delaware company, successor in
interest to Velasco Gas Company Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, dated November 30, 2004.




---



##### 



TORCH ENERGY ROYALTY TRUSTBy:
    Wilmington Trust Company, not in itsindividual capacity but solely as Trustee forthe Trust Date: February 11, 2008
    By:
    /s/ Bruce L. BissonBruce L. BissonVice President(The Trust has no employees, directors or executive officers.)




---



##### 



Exhibit
    
    Description99.1
    
    Second Amendment to Water Gathering and Disposal
Agreement, by and among Robinsons Bend Operating
Company, LLC, a Delaware company, successor in interest
to Torch Energy Associates, Ltd., a Texas limited
partnership, and Everlast Energy LLC, a Delaware
company, successor in interest to Velasco Gas Company
Ltd., a Texas limited partnership, dated November 30,
2004.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3485 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 501(c)(4) entities 

from participating in, or intervening in (including the publishing or 

distributing of statements), any political campaign. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 

Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

501(c)(4) entities from participating in, or intervening 

in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘501(c)(4) Reform Act 

5 of 2015’’. 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3485 IH

1 SEC. 2. 501(c)(4) ENTITIES PROHIBITED FROM PARTICI2 PATING IN, OR INTERVENING IN (INCLUDING 

3 THE PUBLISHING OR DISTRIBUTING OF 

4 STATEMENTS), POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal 

6 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

7 the following: 

8 ‘‘(C) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to 

9 an entity if the entity participates in, or inter10 venes in (including the publishing or distrib11 uting of statements), any political campaign on 

12 behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for 

13 public office.’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

15 subsection (a) shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

16 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS