alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Maria C. Maz, hereby certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q of Waste to Energy  Group Inc. for
          the period ended August 31, 2008 (the  "Report")  fully  complies with
          the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange
          Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Waste to Energy Group Inc.

Dated: October 15, 2008


                               /s/ Maria C. Maz
                               -------------------------------------------------
                               Maria C. Maz
                               President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
                               (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
                               Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
                               Waste to Energy Group Inc.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section  906,  has been  provided to Waste to Energy  Group Inc. and
will be retained by Waste to Energy Group Inc. and  furnished to the  Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 November 2, 2007
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
 American Spectrum Realty, Inc.
  Maryland
    
    001-16785
    
    52-2258674(State or Other 
Jurisdiction of 
incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification
No.)
 5850 San Felipe, Suite 450, Houston, Texas 77057(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
 (713) 706-6200(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02
Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of
Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  AMERICAN SPECTRUM REALTY, INC.By:
    /s/ William J. CardenName:
    William J. CardenTitle:
    Chairman of the Board, President and
Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-6415
TROY GOODMAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus BRIAN A. ABRAHAM, Prosecuting Attorney; SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1370-2) Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 28, 2003 Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Troy Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Troy Goodman appeals the district court’s order accepting the report and recomme ndation of a magistrate judge and denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Goodman v. Abraham , No. CA-02- 1370-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 2003). We grant Goodman leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Gary L. Whitlock, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of CenterPoint Energy Resources Corp.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.Date: August 8, 2007       /s/ Gary L. Whitlock     Gary L. Whitlock    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D. C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934
  Cooper Industries, Ltd.
  Bermuda
(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation)
    
    1-31330
(Commission File Number)
    
    98-0355628
(IRS Employer Identification No.)600 Travis, Suite 5600, 
Houston, Texas
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    
    
    77002
(Zip Code)
 713/209-8400
 
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.Item 3.03 Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders.Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXAmended and Restated Rights Agreement    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
  
 Item 3.03 Material Modification to Rights of Security Holders
  
    
    increases the exercise price of each Right from $225 to $600,
    
    eliminates a ten day window to redeem the Rights after a person has become an
Acquiring Person (as defined in the Amended and Restated Rights Agreement),
    
    adds a provision that allows the Board of Directors to exchange the
outstanding and exercisable Rights for additional common shares (or, in certain
situations, a number of Series A Participating Preferred Shares) at the rate of
one common share per Right, at anytime after a person becomes an Acquiring
Person, and
    
    adds a provision clarifying that Cooper is allowed to lower the acquiror
ownership threshold at which dilution is triggered to no less than 10% at anytime
prior to the time any person becomes an Acquiring Person.
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
 Exhibits
 4.1
    
    Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of August 3, 2007, between
Cooper Industries, Ltd. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent.




---



##### Table of Contents



COOPER INDUSTRIES, LTD.
(Registrant)Date:      August 3, 2007
    /s/  Kevin M. McDonaldKevin M. McDonaldSenior Vice President,
General Counsel and
Chief Compliance Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit No.
 4.1
    
    Amended and Restated Rights Agreement, dated as of August 3, 2007, between
Cooper Industries, Ltd. and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jose Cisneros, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Casita Enterprises, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in
such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Casita Enterprises, Inc.


Date: May 12, 2008                  By: /s/ Jose Cisneros
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jose Cisneros
                                    Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Casita Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Casita Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
The Second Target Station (STS) upgrade to the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) will provide 

transformative capabilities for advanced studies of a wide range of materials, enabling breakthrough 

discoveries in many areas of materials R&D. With the STS, the United States will maintain leadership 

in neutron science, and the high brightness of STS will enable researchers to use neutrons in novel 

ways that advance the technologies underpinning US energy, economic, and national security. 

The STS will help researchers develop advanced materials for clean energy technologies; solutions 

for biotechnology and health, carbon emissions, and advanced manufacturing; and other vital 

applications that help drive our nation’s economy. 

Benefits of the Second Target Station

• Enable innovative neutron experiments, under more extreme conditions, using smaller samples 

• Provide the world’s brightest cold (lower-energy) neutrons to study more complex materials 

• Facilitate faster data collection to study how materials respond to real-world conditions

• Leverage Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s (ORNL’s) existing neutron facilities and expertise 

Second Target Station: 

Enabling New World-Leading 

Neutron Science 

Neutrons: An Essential Research Tool for 

Technology, Industry, and More

ORNL has pioneered neutron research since 1944. Today, the Laboratory operates SNS, the most intense 

accelerator-based pulsed neutron source in the world, and the High Flux Isotope Reactor, a reactorbased neutron source that provides the brightest continuous neutron beams for research in the United 

States. Because of their unique properties, neutrons have helped improve many technologies, including 

computers, cell phones, transportation, batteries, medical devices, energy production, cancer treatments, 

and airport shipping and security.

CONTACT:

Second Target Station 

Project Office

neutrons.ornl.gov

865-241-7667

One Bethel Valley Road 

Oak Ridge, TN 37831

January 2023

Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by UT-Battelle LLC for the US Department of Energy

neutrons.ornl.gov/sts

22 

New independent 

neutron beamlines

100–1,000×

Better performance 

than existing 

neutron instruments

4× 

Greater range 

of usable neutron

wavelengths

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY
1 

### Medina, Dayana

From: Pettyjohn, Mary <PETTYJOHN@adeq.state.ar.us> Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:23 PM
To: Medina, Dayana Subject: FW: Revised BART FFA for Entergy Ark ansas, Inc. - Lake Catherine Unit 4
Attachments: Revised FFA - Entergy Lake Catherine 06-25-13.pdf; Response to R6 Comments - Lake Catherine FFA - 6-25-13.pdf



### Hi Dayana,

Please see below.

Thank you, Mary

From: Triplett, David [mailto:dtripl1@entergy.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:19 PM
To: Pettyjohn, Mary
Cc: McQueen, Kelly; JOHNSON, GEORGE; HANTZ, JOSEPH ; GLOVER, MYRA H; GUNN, TOMMY REID; Chad Wood Subject: Revised BART FFA for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. - Lake Catherine Unit 4

Mary,

Please find attached a revised Five Factor Analysis (FFA) su bmitted for Unit 4 located at the Entergy Arkansas, Inc. – Lake Catherine Plant. This revised FFA is submitted to in corporate changes made in response to questions received from EPA Region 6 regarding the March 2013 FFA. In additi on to the revised FFA, I have also attached a second document in which Entergy responds to each specific comment from EPA Region 6.

A hard copy containing both document s as a single submittal will be fo rwarded to ADEQ this week.

Should you have any questions regarding this information, please let me know.

David Triplett, P.E. Air Lead, Arkansas Environmental Support Entergy Services, Inc. (501) 377-4030 (office) | (501) 650- 1752 (cell) | (281) 297-6126 (fax)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Veterans Affairs

          - [OMB Control No. 2900-0717]

# AGENCY:

 Human Resources and Administration/Operations, Security, and Preparedness, Department of Veterans Affairs.

# ACTION:

Notice; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        On Friday, September 13, 2024, The Human Resources and Administration/Operations, Security, and Preparedness (HRA/OSP), VA, published a notice in the                         **Federal Register**                         announcing an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection Child Care Provider Information—For the Child Care Subsidy Program (VA Form 0730B). This notice was published in error; therefore, this document corrects that error by withdrawing this FR notice, document number 2024-20802.                    

# DATES:

As of October 9, 2024, the FR notice published at 89, FR 75059 on Friday, September 13, 2024, is withdrawn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Maribel Aponte, Office of Enterprise and Integration, Data Governance Analytics (008), 810 Vermont Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20006, (202) 461-8900 or email                         *maribel.aponte@va.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

FR Doc. 2024-20802, published on Friday, September 13, 2024 (89 FR 75059), is withdrawn by this notice.

By direction of the Secretary.

Maribel Aponte,

VA PRA Clearance Officer, Office of Enterprise and Integration/Data Governance Analytics, Department of Veterans Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2024-23699 Filed 10-11-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8320-01-P
Exhibit 15.1





| | Deloitte & Co. S.A.
        Florida 234, 5° piso
        C1005AAF
        Ciudad Autónoma
        de Buenos Aires
        Argentina
        
        Tel.: (+54-11) 4320-2700
        Fax: (+54-11) 4325-8081/4326-7340
        www.deloitte.com/ar
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference
in registration statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-201602 and 333-211835) of Globant S.A. of our report dated March 29, 2017, appearing
in the annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 of Globant S.A., relating to the consolidated financial
statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, which report expresses
an unqualified opinion.





City of Buenos Aires, Argentina

April 7, 2017



Deloitte & Co. S.A.





/s/ Gabriel Gómez Paz

Partner



















|Deloitte refers to one
        or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, a UK private company limited by guarantee (“DTTL”), its network
        of member firms, and their related entities. DTTL and each of its member firms are legally separate and independent entities.
        DTTL (also referred to as “Deloitte Global”) does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about
        for a more detailed description of DTTL and its member firms.
        
        Deloitte Touche Tomatsu
        Limited is a private Company limited by guarantee incorporated in England & Wales under Company number 07271800, and
        its registered office is Hill House, 1 Little new Street, London, EC4a, 3TR, United Kingdom. | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3631 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal the sunset of 

the special immigrant nonminister religious worker program. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 28, 2015 

Mr. HONDA (for himself, Mr. JOLLY, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. 

SWALWELL of California, Ms. GABBARD, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Ms. MENG, 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio, Mr. PETERS, and Ms. LOFGREN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal 

the sunset of the special immigrant nonminister religious 

worker program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Freedom of Faith Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NONMINISTER RELIGIOUS 

7 WORKER PROGRAM. 

8 Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and 

9 Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3631 IH

1 in subclauses (II) and (III) by striking ‘‘before September 

2 30, 2015,’’ both places such term appears. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Investor Contact:
    
    Larry P. Kromidas
(618) 258-3206
 (OLIN LOGO)
    
    (PIONEER LOGO)
 
  OLIN AND PIONEER ANNOUNCE ACQUISITION OF PIONEER BY OLIN
 (NYSE: OLN) (Nasdaq: PONR)
  COMPANY DESCRIPTIONS




---



#####
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 14 - 00256 - CV IN RE KENNETH WEBB, RELATOR ORIGINAL PROCEEDING 

### July 31 , 2014 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Relator Kenneth G. Webb, appearing pro se, seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Honorable William D. Smith, presiding judge of the 84th District Court of Hansford County, to rule on “all motions that have been filed in case #CV 04982 since” March 19, 2009. According to relator’s petition, the underlying case is a probate proceeding. Mandamus relief is an extraordinary remedy. In re Southwestern Bell Telephone Co., L.P., 235 S.W.3d 619, 623 (Tex. 2007) (orig. proceeding). To be entitled to relief by mandamus, the relator must show the trial court clearly abused its discretion, and that the relator has no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Ford Motor Co., 988 S.W.2d 714, 718 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 840
- 442

(Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). The burden to d emonstrate entitlement to mandamus relief is on the relator. See Walker , 827 S.W.2d at 837. This includes providing an adequate record to substantiate the allegations contained in the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.7; Dallas Morni ng News v. Fifth Court of Appeals, 842 S.W.2d 655, 658 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). We will deny relator’s petition. The petition does not comply with the form and contents requirements for a petition in an original proceeding, as specified by the rules governing such proceedings. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3 (setting out required contents of petition). Most significantly, the petition is not accompanied by an appendix or record. Nothing relator has submitted substantiates the allegations contained in his petition. See also T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.3(j) (requiring person filing petition to cert ify that factual statements in petition are supported by “competent evidence included in the appendix or record”). Without an adequate record, relator is wholly unable to prove that Judge Smith has abused his discretion if indeed he has not ruled on all p ending motions. Because relator has thus failed to demonstrate an abuse of discretion by the trial court, his petition for writ of mandamus must be, and is, denied

.

James T. Campbell Justice