alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### DE JEAN v. STATE.

No. 16428.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 27, 1934.

*539E. T. Miller, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the transportation of potable liquor containing a prohibited percentage of .alcohol; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The opinion formerly written is withdrawn and the present one substituted in lieu thereof.

The appellant’s motortruck was searched by officers and a quantity of beer was found therein. The action was taken without a search warrant. Appellant contends that the search was not founded upon probable cause such as authorized the search. Officers observed appellant driving a truck upon one of the streets of Amarillo, called Line avenue, about 4 o’clock in the morning. The truck had a canvas over it which was nailed down. When followed by the officers the truck was •driven by the appellant on a street which was several blocks removed from the business houses of the city. The truck was situated more than a block from the railroad tracks. Upon leaving Line avenue, the truck was driven across an unpaved “blind” street. When appellant turned the truck into the street mentioned, the officers became suspicious. They saw that the truck was heavily loaded, ■and that in passing over rough places it was ■driven slowly. The officers knew that beer had been legalized in the state of Colorado and had heard that persons were hauling it into the city of Amarillo. The license upon the truck was issued by the state of New Mexico. The officers were without information touching the appellant or the truck he was driving or the contents thereof. In seizing the truck they acted upon suspicion growing out of the facts above stated. They caused appellant to stop his truck and made inquiry as to its contents. Appellant informed them that he had potatoes in his truck. The officers did not believe that the truck was loaded with potatoes. They raised the canvas and observed that the truck was loaded-with some square boxes which, upon further investigation, were shown to contain beer.

It is strenuously contended by the appellant that the facts existing were not sufficient to authorize .the search without a warrant, and for that reason the evidence obtained through the search was not admissible. In support of his contention, the case of Williams v. State, 119 Tex. Cr. R. 345, 42 S.W.(2d) 1017, is deemed in point. An examination of the testimony leads us to the conclusion that the search of the truck was not upon probable cause as that term is defined in Landa v. Obert, 45 Tex. 539, and many decisions of this court dealing with the same subject.

Por the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Attachment 6: Open Fee-for-Service (FFS) FEHB Plan Contacts for Ordering CDs

for the Visually Impaired 

Plan 

Code(s) Plan Name Material Type

Contact Person and Email 

Address Phone Fax

47 APWU CDs Tina Cromartie

tcromartie@apwuhp.com 

(410) 424-1507 (410) 424-1572

10, 11 BCBS CDs Paula Spurway

Paula.Spurway@bcbsa.com

(202) 942-1274 (202) 942-1263

31 GEHA CDs Bunny Kimbrough 

Bunny.Kimbrough@geha.com 

(800) 821-6136

ext. 5104

(816) 257-3333

41, 45, 

48

Mail Handlers CDs Gloria Gedrich 

gloriagedrich@firsthealth.com

(301) 517-2032 (301) 517-2127

32 NALC CDs Carmella Cosentine

CCosentine@nalchbp.org

(703) 729-8104 (703) 729-8109

44 SAMBA CDs Sandy Webb 

swebb@sambaplans.com

(301) 984-4122 (301) 984-6224
Conclusion and Summary

As set forth herein, KM Video Productions, LLC seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R.

11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will 

permit the safe operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ UAS commercially, without an 

airworthiness certificate, for limited use conducting aerial video and photography in Camden 

South Carolina and the Central South Carolina area.

By granting this petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressional mandate of 

the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, while advancing the interests of the public, by 

allowing KM Video Productions, LLC to safely, efficiently and economically operate the DJI 

Phantom 2 Vision + UAS commercially within the National Air Space.

Wherefore, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization 

and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, KM Video Productions, LLC respectfully requests that the 

Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. Sections 

61.113(a)& (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)&(a)(2), and 

91.417(a)&(b), and permit KM Video Productions, LLC to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision + 

UAS commercially for the purpose of conducting aerial video and photography over certain 

areas of the United States.

Dated: June 19, 2015

Respectfully submitted, KM Video Productions, LLC

 ____________________________________

KM Video Productions, LLC 

Kirk Mays 

1110 A Broad Street 

Camden, SC 29020 

Email: kirk@kmvideoproductions.com
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Gregory S. Martin, as ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 10, 2009 | /s/ GREGORY S. MARTIN            |
|-----------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                        |                             |
|                        | Name: Gregory S. Martin          |
|                        | Title: *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
EX-10.2



 Exhibit 10.2 

REAFFIRMATION OF GUARANTY 

The undersigned has executed that certain Guaranty Agreement dated as of July 24, 2013 (the “Guaranty”), in favor of
Bank of America, N.A., a national banking association, and its successors and assigns (“Lender”). The Guaranty was entered into in connection with a $60,000,000 loan (the “Loan”) made by Lender to RIF I – Don
Julian, LLC, a California limited liability company, RIF I – Lewis Road, LLC, a California limited liability company, RIF I – Oxnard, LLC, a California limited liability company, RIF I – Walnut, LLC, a California limited liability
company, Rexford Business Center – Fullerton, LLC, a California limited liability company, RIF II – Kaiser, LLC, a California limited liability company, and RIF III – Irwindale, LLC, a California limited liability company
(individually and collectively, the “Original Borrower”). Pursuant to the Guaranty, the undersigned guaranteed certain obligations owing by Borrower under, among other things, that certain Term Loan Agreement dated as of
July 24, 2013 (the “Loan Agreement”) between Original Borrower and Lender. Capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings ascribed to them in the Loan Agreement, as modified by the Modification Agreement
(defined below). 
 Concurrently herewith, the Loan Documents are being modified to provide for, among other things, the release of RIF II
– Kaiser, LLC, as a “Borrower” under the Loan Documents, the addition of Rexford Industrial – Madera Industrial, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Additional Borrower”) as a “Borrower” under
the Loan Documents, and the substitution of the Rexford Industrial – Madera Property for the RIF II – Kaiser Property as collateral for the loan (including the reconveyance of the lien of the RIF II – Kaiser Mortgage and the
acceptance of the Rexford Industrial – Madera Mortgage), all pursuant to a Modification and Assumption Agreement dated of even date herewith (the “Modification Agreement”). 

The undersigned hereby acknowledges notice of the Modification Agreement and all of the other documents being executed and delivered in
connection therewith (collectively, the “Modification Documents”), consents thereto, and hereby reaffirms and agrees that: 

(a) the undersigned’s obligations and covenants set forth in the Guaranty shall remain in full force and effect after giving effect to
the Modification Documents; 
 (b) nothing in the Guaranty obligates Borrower or Lender to notify the undersigned of any changes in the
financial accommodations available to Borrower or to seek reaffirmations of the Guaranty; and 
 (c) no requirement to notify the
undersigned or to seek the undersigned’s reaffirmation in the future shall be implied by the execution of this Reaffirmation of Guaranty. 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed and delivered this Reaffirmation of Guaranty to Lender as of January 24, 2014. 

 

			
	REXFORD INDUSTRIAL REALTY, INC.,
	a Maryland corporation,
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Howard Schwimmer

	Name:	 	Howard Schwimmer
	Title:	 	Co-Chief Executive Officer
#### GILLOCK v. STATE.

No. 18290.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 5, 1936.

Shead & Smith, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary and sentenced to confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment is regular and properly presented. The evidence heard before the trial court is not brought forward for review. Nothing is perceived which would authorize interference with the judgment. It is therefore affirmed.
No. 70293 

# FILED JUN 0 3 2016 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

YELLOW EXPRESS, LLC; AND YELLOW LOGISTICS, LLC, Appellants, VS. M&M TOW & TRANSPORT, LLC; SUPERIOR TOW & TRANSPORT, LLC; AND MARK DINGLEY, Respondents.



### ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is an appeal from an order granting judgment as a matter of law in a business dispute. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; Elliott A. Sattler, Judge.

The notice of appeal was filed without payment of the filing fee. That same day, this court issued a notice to appellants that no action would be taken on this appeal until the filing fee was paid. To date, appellants have not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to this court's notice.

In addition, we note that the notice of appeal was filed by nonattorneys Randeep Singh and Sukhjinder Kaur. A corporation may not appear in pro se or be represented by a non-attorney. 

### See State v. SW' 's Bail Bonds, 115 Nev. 436, 436 n.1, 991 P.2d 469, 470 n.1 (1999) (noting that "business entities are not permitted to appear, or file documents, in proper person"); 

### Salman v. Newell, 110 Nev. 1333, 1336, 885 P.2d 607, 608 (1994) (observing that no statute or rule permits a non-lawyer to represent an entity and concluding that an entity cannot proceed in proper person).

Finally, respondents have filed a motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the notice of appeal was untimely filed. No opposition

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 15)17Ahas been filed. The district court entered its order on March 23, 2016.

Respondents served written notice of entry on appellants by electronic service, and provide a return of electronic filing indicating that counsel for appellants received the notice of entry on March 23, 2016. Accordingly, the notice of appeal was due by April 22, 2016. 

### See NRAP 4(a)(1); NRAP 26(c). The notice of appeal was filed in the district court on April 27, 2016, five days after the 30-day deadline. Accordingly, we conclude the notice of appeal was untimely filed and we lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Respondents' motion to dismiss is granted, and we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.



### / vera.At Hardesty

J.

Pickering

cc: Hon. Elliott A. Sattler, District Judge Darby Law Practice, Ltd. Luke A. Busby Edmund J. Gorman Randeep Singh Sukhjinder Kaur Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 

### e 2
#### In the Matter of the Accounting of Anna Boyd, as Administratrix of the Estate of Robert W. Boyd, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Westchester County,

August 14, 1957.

*Lo Cascio & Gleeson*for petitioner.

*Leonard Weiss,*special guardian.

George A. Brenner, S.

The administratrix will be authorized to compromise the cause of action for wrongful death for the amount proposed, and attorneys’ fees will be allowed in the amount requested.

The decedent died instantaneously as the result of an automobile collision which occurred in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Since the proceeds of an action for wrongful death are distributable in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction under which the cause of action arose *(Gulf, Colorado Ry. Co.*v. *McGinnis,*228 U. S. 173; *Engel*v. *Davenport,*271 U. S. 33; *Lynott*v. *Great Lakes Tr. Corp.,*202 App. Div. 613, affd. 234 N. Y. 626; *Matter of Uravic,*142 Misc. 775; *Matter of De Martino,*142 Misc. 431), the proceeds of the recovery are here distributable pursuant to the laws of Pennsylvania.

Proof submitted as to the statutes of Pennsylania stated to be applicable provides for the survival of actions for wrongful death (20 Purdon’s Penna. Stats., § 320.601) maintainable by the widow of such deceased, or if there be no widow, by the personal representatives. (12 Purdon’s Penna. Stats., § 1601.) The persons entitled to recover damages for injuries resulting in death are limited to the surviving spouse, children or parents of the decedent, to be distributed as in intestacy. (12 Purdon’s Penna. Stats., § 1602.) Where as here the decedent is survived by a spouse and by two children, the surviving spouse is entitled *34to one third of the proceeds of such recovery and each of the surviving children is entitled to one third of such recovery (20 Pur don’s Penna. Stats., §§ 1.2, 1.3) in the absence of a finding that any of such parties failed to sustain a pecuniary loss. In actions for wrongful death expenses incurred for medical and nursing care, as well as reasonable funeral expenses, are recoverable as damages. (12 Pardon’s Penna. Stats., § 1604.)

It appearing that the expenses incurred for funeral expenses are reasonable, the claim for reimbursement of the amount so paid is allowed. In the absence of any basis for a finding that any of the persons who would otherwise be entitled to share failed to sustain a pecuniary loss, the net proceeds of said recovery are distributable equally between the widow and the two surviving children of decedent.

Settle decree on notice accordingly, providing for payment by the defendants or its carrier of the proceeds of such compromise direct to the persons entitled as hereinabove determined.
SHARE

# Bio-Scales

## Project Details

                    Mitchel                             J                              Doktycz            

                    -  Biology and Environment 

Complex systems at every scale of life, from cells to organisms to the global ecosystem, impact the movement of energy and materials. Understanding the intricate ways that interactions between genes and traits influence outcomes on the ecosystem scale can inform a range of solutions for issues such as removing carbon from the atmosphere through biological means, managing nutrient cycles, reducing mercury pollution, recovering from extreme weather events, and designing secure biosystems.

Learn more about current Bio-Scales research focused on how plant-microbe interactions influence the nitrogen cycle here.

### Contact

MitchelJ Doktycz

doktyczmj@ornl.gov

## Organizations

Biological and Environmental Systems Science Directorate

Biosciences Division

Fact Sheet
# Research Highlights

              -  Machine learning for automated exploration of metal halide perovskitesRead More 
              -  Bifunctional nanoprecipitates strengthen and ductilize a medium-entropy alloyRead More 

## Filter Research Highlights

### Area of Research

            - Biological Systems(1)
            - Chemistry and Physics at Interfaces(8)
            - Clean Energy(1)
            - Computer Science(2)
            - Functional Materials for Energy(11)
            - Materials(128)
            - Materials Characterization(7)
            - Materials for Computing(22)
            - Materials Synthesis from Atoms to Systems(3)
            - Materials Theory and Simulation(3)
            - Materials Under Extremes(2)
            - Neutron Science(2)
            - Nuclear Science and Technology(2)
            - Nuclear Security Science and Technology(1)
            - Quantum information Science(1)
            - Supercomputing(1)

### Date

            - 2024
            - 2023
            - 2022
            - 2021
            - 2020
            - 2019
            - 2018
            - 2017
            - 2016
            - 2015
            - 2014
            - 0018

## Extreme Fragility of Local Structure of Metallic Glasses

March 11, 2024

## Amorphous Hydroxylation of MgO in the Presence of High Humidity

February 20, 2024

## The role of electron correlations in the electronic structure of putative Chern magnet TbMn6Sn6

January 25, 2024

## Closed-loop recycling of semi-aromatic polyesters upcycled from poly(ethylene terephthalate

December 19, 2023

## Weaving magnetism into a family of kagome metals

December 19, 2023

A new class of cleavable kagome metal compounds was discovered in which topological electronic structures are intertwined with magnetism. 

## Gapless topological surface states are explained by stacking-fault disorder

December 8, 2023

## Spin-phonon interaction drives real-space charge modulation in kagome magnet

October 26, 2023

## Kagome metal rattles its chains

October 23, 2023

## Armoring Impedes Direct Air Capture of CO2 by MgO

October 23, 2023

## Oxygen control irons out cation disorder

September 29, 2023

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
- ...
-  Next page›› 
-  Last pageLast » 

## Current Research

## News

Three ORNL IP projects advance toward Lab MATCH Prize

## News

Unique regional partnerships a key theme in SkyNano’s story

## News

Hu Miao named outstanding referee of physics journals

## News

Extreme Fragility of Local Structure of Metallic Glasses
# L_2011047EN.01000701.xml

| 22.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 47/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 47/7

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 160/2011

of 21 February 2011

entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (‘Lovecký salám’/‘Lovecká saláma’ (TSG))

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 of 20 March 2006 on agricultural products and foodstuffs as traditional specialities guaranteed (1), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 9(4) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, the Czech Republic and Slovakia's joint application to register the name ‘Lovecký salám’/‘Lovecká saláma’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to the first subparagraph of Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006, the Czech Republic and Slovakia's joint application to register the name ‘Lovecký salám’/‘Lovecká saláma’ was published in the Official Journal of the European Union (2).

| (2) | As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

As no objection under Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has been received by the Commission, that name should therefore be entered in the register.

| (3) | Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Protection as referred to in Article 13(2) of Regulation (EC) No 509/2006 has not been requested,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The name contained in the Annex to this Regulation is hereby entered in the register.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 February 2011.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 93, 31.3.2006, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ C 96, 16.4.2010, p. 18.

2

---

ANNEX

Products listed in Annex I to the Treaty, intended for human consumption:

Class 1.2.   Meat products (cooked, salted, smoked, etc.)

CZECH REPUBLIC

Lovecký salám (TSG)

SLOVAKIA

Lovecká saláma (TSG)

---
STEPHAN K. STUCKEY,

Appellant,

v.

SCOTT CREWS, WARDEN, 

MAYO CORRECTIONAL 

INSTITUTION, STATE OF 

FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D14-3089

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 18, 2015.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Lafayette County.

Darren Jackson, Judge.

Stephan K. Stuckey, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Angela R. Hensel, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

THOMAS, CLARK, and WETHERELL, JJ., CONCUR.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS
13
- 17
- 00628
- CV Brownsville Independent School District

v. Arthur Rendon
On a ppeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County , Texas Trial Cause No. 2016
- DCL
- 8238
- H

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, havi ng considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings c onsistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee
. We further order this decision certified below for observance. April 12 , 2018
Exhibit
32.1





Certification of Principal
Executive Officer


Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Plastron Acquisition Corp. II (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Rapp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Michael RappMichael
      Rapp
                            Principal
      Executive Officer
                            May 13,
    2009