ENTEC $••ces" 

Pollution Control System Evaluation and Source Emissions Testing 

Cherokee Brick and Tile 

Macon, Georgia 

Compliance Emissions Re-Testing 

No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber Stack 

dUN 2 2008 

April 19, 2007 

Entec Project No.: 27147 

16-D Commerce Avenue Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676 Fax (205) 491-6614 

www.entecservices.com 
Entec Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-6676 

Fax: (205) 491-6614 

Results of the April 19, 2007 

Emissions Re-Testing for Particulate w/HCI / HF on 

No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber Stack at the 

Cherokee Brick Facility located in 

Macon, Georgia 

Submitted to: 

Cherokee Brick and Tile Co. 

3250 Waterville Road 

Macon, Georgia 31206 

Attention: Mr. Jim Owens 

Entec Project No. 27147 

Completed By: 

Art Otero 

Project Manager 

Report Submitted: April 25, 2007 

Reviewed By: 

Tom Lotz 

Technical Services Manager 

hereby certify to the best of my knowledge all field sampling and laboratory analysis performed for 

this report is authentic and accurate. It has been checked for completeness and accuracy. 
Cherokee Brick and Tile Co. 

Table of Contents 

Section Page No. 

Executive Summary 

Emissions Summary 

Detailed Test Results 

I 

2 

3 

Sampling Procedures 

Location of Test Ports 

Method 5126A Sampling Train 

No.1 No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber Field Data Sheets 

Test Run 1 

Test Run 2 

Test Run 3 

Control Room Data 

Test Protocol 

Quality Control I Quality Assurance Procedures 

QA/QC Checklist 

Orifice Check and Temperature Check 

Fyrite I Orsat Standardization 

Laboratory Analysis 

Equipment Calibrations 

Nomenclature and Test Calculations 

7 

11 

12 

13 

14. 

18 

22 

26 

28 

43 

49 

5O 

51 

56 

73 

83 
Executive Summary 

Cherokee Brick located in Macon, Georgia, retained Entec Services, Inc. to perform 

emissions re-testing on the No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber Stack. Mr. Art Otero, 

Mr. Trent McMahan and Mr. Ryan Harris, of Entec Services, Inc. conducted the testing on 

April 19, 2007. Representing Cherokee Brick was Mr. Jim Owens who coordinated testing 

with the control room production activity. Representing the state from the Georgia 

Department of Natural Resources was Mr. Daniel McCain. 

Entec Services, Inc. encountered no difficulties in the field collection of the samples or in 

the laboratory analysis of the samples 

The emissions test summary on the following page gives a detailed summary of each test 

run compared to the maximum emission limits set forth by the Georgia Department of 

Natural Resources. Test results indicate the emissions results were below the 

emissions standards set forth by Permit No. 3251-021-0167-V-02-0 ID No. PCD01, 

except for the particulate emissions in Ibs/ton of Fired Brick. 
Entec Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Avenue 

Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Telephone: (205) 491-6676 

Fax: (205) 491-6614 

Results of the April 19, 2007 

Emissions Re-Testing for Particulate w/HCI / HF on 

No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry. Lime Absorber Stack at the 

Cherokee Brick Facility located in 

Macon, Georgia 

Submitted to: 

Cherokee Brick and Tile Co. 

3250 Waterville Road 

Macon, Georgia 31206 

Attention: Mr. Jim Owens 

Entec Project No. 27147 

Completed By: 

Art Otero 

Project Manager 

Report Submitted: April 25, 2007 

Reviewed By: 

Tom Lotz 

Technical Services Manager 

hereby certify to the best of my knowledge all field sampling and laboratory analysis performed for 

this report is authentic and accurate. It has been checked for completeness and accuracy. 


Entec Services, Inc. 

SOURCE OVERVIEW 

SOURCE OWNER: Cherokee Brick and Tile 

PLANT LOCATION: Macon, GA 

SOURCE(S) NAME(S): 

SOURCE(S) CONDITION: 

SOURCE(S) SHAPE: 

No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack 

Brick MACT Re-Test Higher Production Rate 

Cimular 

PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: 

SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: 

TEST PERFORMED: 

REFERENCE METHOD TESTS: 

PROJECT MANAGER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST PROJECT LEADER 

ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST ASSISTANT 

ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST-VE READERS 

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: 

RULING AGENCY: 

RULING AGENCY REPRESENTATIVE: 

DATES TESTS CONDUCTED: 

ENTEC PROJECT NUMBER: 

Acetone 

3251-021o0167-Vo02-0 ID No. PCD01 

Lime MACT Subpart JJJJJ 

Sample Location 

Volumetric Flow 

Molecular Weight 

Moisture Content 

Particulate 

Visible Emissions 

HCI and HF 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

EPA Method 

Mr. Lynn Beane 

Mr. Art Otero 

Mr. Ryan Harris 

Mr. Trent McMahan 

Mr. Jim Owens 

Georgia Department of Natural Resources 

Mr. Daniel McCain 

04/19/07 

27147 

1 

2 

3 

4 

5 

9 

26A 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: Job No.: 27147 

Source: Data Input By: Art Otero 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Test Run Began Ended 

Sampling Time 

Stack Area 

Units Test Data 

1 2 3 

Military Time 

minutes 

04119/07 

0751-0855 

6O 

04119/07 

0928-1030 

Cherokee Brick and Tile 

No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack 

Field Data Symbol 

0 

Pbar 

P• 

Cp 

Y 

D. 

v. 

Wimp 

Ws• 

o= 

CO2 

(sqrt AP)•,• 

HCL 

HF 

mn 

in. Hz0 -0.16 

6O 

04119/07 

-0.23 

1059-1202 

60 

Ftt 22.166 22.166 22.166 

Barometric Pressure in. Hg 29.60 29.60 29.60 

Stack Static Pressure -0.19 

Pitot Tube Correction factor 

Meter Correction Factor 

Meter Delta H @ 

•ozzle Diameter 

Meter Volume 

AVERAGE 

Avg. Orifice Delta H 

Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) 

Oxygen Concentration, dry basis 

Carbon Dioxide Concentration, dry basis 

60 

29.60 

-0o19 

0.84 0.84 0.84 0.84 

0.995 0.995 0.995 0.995 

inoH• 1.864 1.864 1.864 1.864 

inches 0.300 0.300 0.300 0.300 

dcf 44.306 43.334 44.186 43.942 

Meter Temperature °F 73.3 80.5 87.9 80.6 

in. H=0 1.89 1.82 1.81 1.84 

g•ms 104.0 102.5 95.3 100.6 

g•ms 13.1 13.6 11.5 12.7 

17.0 

4.0 

0.619 

17.0 

(in. H=0) lrz 

F 

4.0 

0.605 

352.6 

23.8 

17.0 

mg 

mg 

mg 

Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P 

Stack Temperature 

4.0 

0.604 

356.8 

22.7 

354.8 

Total Hydrogen Chloride collected, m 9 24.0 

Total Hydrogen Fluoride collected, mg 

Particulate collected 

7.5 7.4 7.8 

547.9 243.1 29.0 

17.0 

4.0 

0.609 

364.7 

23.5 

7.6 

273.3 

5 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

CALCULA'IED TEST DATA 

Client: Cherokee Brick and Tile 

Source: No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack 

Description Formulas Symbol 

Run Number 

Test Date 

Time Began-Ended 

1. Stack Pressure P=w P¢113.( 

2. Meter Pressure P• •1113.! 

3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64- Y* 

4a. Standard Volume of Water Va•or Condensed 

4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel 

!5. Moisture Fraction =(v,.•,•+ v._:_:.:•y(v.•,• v•.•; v,•,•) 

6. Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (Theoretical) 

7. Standard Water Volume @ Saturation (Theoretical) 

8. Volume of Water @ Saturation (Theoretical) 

9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 

10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 

11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 

12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions 

:W,•a•/0.0470; 

0.32"(Oz}+ 0.44"(CO:)+0.28*(100-(O•(CO•)] 

M•*( 1.B,,,)+18.0o(B,,,, 

85.49"•p*(sqrt •o)=,•*SQRT((TJ 

13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 

14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 

141). Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond..Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01S43"HC•,)/Q• 

14b. Hydrogen Fluodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 

15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions 

=15b. Hydrogen Chlodde emissions. Ibs per hour 

15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour 

21. Particulate emissions 

22. Volume collected through nozzle 

23. Particulate concentration. (• actual conditions 

=0.01543"n•N.x,= 

=(s0n0e0)"H• •-O,= 

=TJP=*|0.002669*V•+ 

Job No.: 27147 

Data Input By: Art Otaro 

Units Calculated Data 

2 3 AVERAGE 

04/19/07 04/19/07 04/19/07 

M,•ryT•e 0751-0855 0928-1030 1059-1202 

P, in. Hg 29.59 29.58 29.59 29.59 

P•a in. Hg 29.74 29.73 29.73 29.74 

v,,• •scf 43.363 41.841 42.085 42.430 

;'*,•,e 4.•4 4.oz,• 4.•) 4.734 

v•.•_, scf 0.618 0.641 0.542 0.600 

B, fr=.•,,• 0.1128 0.1155 O.1067 0.1117 

"m,,, ;'.•;;•, 9.3333 9.0833 9.5810 9.3326 

•,• scf -48.566 -47.018 -46.990 -47.524 

W• ml -1031.8 -998.9 -998.3 -1009.7 

M= g/0-mole 29.320 29.320 29.320 29.320 

M, g/g-moin 28.043 28.012 28.112 28.056 

v, rUs 44.02 43.05 42.96 43.346 

o• acfm 58.552 57,257 57.138 57.649 

Q, scrm 37.509 36,771 36,507 36,929 

Q,,, a=•r., 33,279 32,523 32,611 32,804 

HCLcs §d,;•.•.; 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.009 

HFcs •,;•;=t.• 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 

c, or/dsc• 0.1950 0.0896 0.0106 0.0984 

HCI -;;.=%• Ibs/hr 2.44 2.44 2.33 2.40 

HF -•bs•h• Ibs/hr 0.76 0.76 0.80 0.77 

PMR Ib/hr 55.61 24.99 2.97 27.86 

v. acf 76.296 73,664 73,738 74,566 

¢, 8r/acf 0.1108 0.0509 0.0061 0.0559 

24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100*Vnl (60"vz*•'9) % 98.07 96.83 97.13 97.34 

Post Meter Odfice Cal. ,EMC ALT-00S Yqa, Y, ;iiiiiii!ili•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii 1.0269 1.0360 1.0195 1.0275 

• Difference. (=lib=on must be within 6% of original YJactor) iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii•iii•ili•ii;i•;i;i;iii;i 
Procedures 
Procedures 

The particulate hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride emissions were determined using 

EPA Methods 1-5/26A, and 9, CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix A. The calibration and 

quality assurance procedures of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix A for all methods, and the 

"Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement System" Volume III 

Stationary Source-Specific Methods were followed throughout the duration of the field and 

laboratory testing. 

The most current version for each method (as described in the Federal Register) was 

used. 

Stack Gas Volumetric Flow 

The velocity of the gas stream was determined according to EPA Reference Method 1 and 

2 by reading the instantaneous velocity head with an inclined manometer at each 

sampling point with a calibrated S-type pitot tube attached adjacent to the sample nozzle. 

The stack pressure was measured with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated 

pyrometer was used to measure stack temperature at each sampling point. 

Stack Gas Molecular Weight 

The carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations were determined using EPA Reference. 

Method 3 (Fyrite Method). A sample of the flue gas was extracted from the gas stream 

during each test. These samples were analyzed with a Fyrite gas analyzer. The molecular 

weight of the gas was calculated using the moisture, oxygen and carbon dioxide content 

and the measured stack gas temperature. 

Moisture Content 

The moisture content used for calculating the gas stream flow rate was determined by 

measuring the amount of condensed moisture in the glass impinger and silica gel impinger 

in the sampling train as described in EPA Reference Method 4 at the completion of each 

test. 

The moisture collection system consists of a series of 4 impingers connected to a silica gel 

impinger attached to the outlet. Ice is placed around the impingers. The outlet 
temperature of the impingers are monitored and recorded throughout the duration of the 

testing to verify the temperature is below <68 o F. 

Hydrogen Chloride I Fluoride with ParticulatePreliminary data was used to determine stack temperature, pressure, and range of 

velocity heads, moisture content and stack gas dry molecular weight prior to sampling. 

The meter box was leak checked from the pump to the orifice. Initial and final leak checks 

of the sampling system and pitot lines were performed as outlined in Method 5 and were 

recorded on the data sheets. The nozzle was calibrated before and after the test using a 

micrometer and was also recorded on the field data sheets. 

The sampling probe was placed at each sampling point to provide a total sampling time of 

at least 60 minutes and a volume of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases were drawn 

through a teflon coated nozzle attached to a heated glass lined probe. The probe hot box 

was maintained at the proper setting to obtain a temperature of > 248 0 F. The gases then 

proceeded through borosilicate glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support through a 

tarred Teflon or quartz fiber filter to remove particulate matter. The exit of the filter was 

maintained at a temperature of > 248 o F. These temperatures were recorded at each 

point on the field data sheets. 

The gases were then scrubbed through a series of four impingers to capture hydrogen 

halides, and moisture. The optional moisture knockout impinger was not used in the 

sample train. The first and second impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1N 

H2SO4 solution and the third and fourth impingers contained approximately 100 ml of a 0.1 

N NaOH solution. The fifth impinger contained pre weighed silica gel to remove any 

remaining moisture. The gases passed through the impinger series in an ice bath to 

maintain a maximum exit temperature of 68 0 F. This temperature was also recorded on 

the field data sheets. The clean and cool gases then entered the meter box where the 

gas flow and temperature were measured. 

After the completion of each test run leak rate determinations were made and recorded on 

the field data sheets. Then the sampling train and the probe nozzle assembly were 

9 
transferred to the cleanup area making sure no particulate was lost. The cleanup data 

was also recorded on the field data sheets and / or the laboratory checklist sheet. 

Particulate catches were placed in sealed petri dishes. Each acetone rinse from the 

nozzle, probe, and filter holder were combined and placed in a sealed container. The first, 

and second impingers were weighed and transferred to its container and the rinsing from 

the glassware will be added to this container. The third and fourth impinger contents were 

weighed for moisture determination calculations but were not kept for analysis. The silica 

gel from the fifth impinger was transferred to its respective tarred container and weighed. 

For the group of tests an acetone blank, sulfuric acid solution, distg eled water and acetone 

of approximately 200 milliliters were placed in a sealed container. These containers were 

clearly marked and transported to the laboratory for analysis. 

Enthalpy performed all of the laboratory analysis and is an approved Louisiana accredited 

lab (Certification Number 04010) that meets all requirements for the State of Georgia 

approved and accredited laboratory. 

Visual Emissions 

Trent McMahan from Entec Services, Inc. stood at a distance sufficient.to provide a clear 

view of the emissions with the sun oriented in the 140 ° sector to his back. Consistent with 

maintaining the above requirement, the observer did, as much as possible; make his 

observations from a position such that his line of vision is approximately perpendicular to 

the plume direction. The observer's line of sight did not include more than one plume at a 

time when multiple stacks are involved, and in any case the observer did make his 

observations with his line of sight perpendicular to the longer axis of such a set of multiple 

stacks (e.g., stub stacks on bag-houses). The observer recorded the name of the plant, 

emission location, facility type, observer's name and affiliation, and the date on a field data 

sheet. The time, estimated distance to the emission location, approximate wind direction, 

estimated wind speed, description of the sky condition (presence and color of clouds), and 

plume background are recorded on the field data sheets at the time opacity readings are 

initiated and completed. Observations were made in fifteen-second intervals and recorded 

in increments of 5%. The baghouse was observed for three one hour runs in conjunction 

with the Method 5 / 26A testing. 

10 
Entec Services, Inc 

16 D Commerce Ave. Hue•p•n AL 35023 

STACK DRAWING & TRAVERSE POINT LOCATION 

Client: Cherokee Brick and Tile Job No. 27147 

Source: No.l and Noo2 DLA Stack Input By: Art Otero 

Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate (P): P 

Stack Diameter, inches: 63.75 

Stack Height, feat: 100 

Stack Properties: Inches Duct Diameters 

Port Type Flange Port Diameter 6.0" 

Stack Area, Ft2: 22.166 

Number of Ports: 2 

Length of Port, inches: 8.25 

Upstream Disturbance: 170.0 

Downstream Disturbance: 684.0 

2.67 

10.73 

Total Number of Traverse Points: 

Number of Points per diameter:. 

12 

6 

63.8 INCHES 

170.(] 

684.0 

INCHES 

NCHES 

Point No. 

Inside Stack Outside Nipple 

Inches Inches 

1 2.8 11.1 

2 9.3 17.6 

3 18.9 27.1 

4 44.9 63.1 

5 54.4 62.7 

6 60.9 69.2 

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch 

Adjusted points diameter< 24" no point closer than 0.5 inch 

Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 

4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream and 

upstream cdteria is met. 
Method 5/26A Sampling Train 

Filter Exit Temperature 

(>248 F) 

npinger npinger 

# #2: 

100ml 1.00ml 

O.1N O.1N 

i•SO• t•SO• 

npmger 

#3 

0.1N 

•aOH 

Impinger Exit Temperature 

(<68 F) 

mplnger rap: n[ 

#4 • 5 

Exhaust O00000 

Temp. and Flow 

Controllers 

Temperature 

Dry Gas Meter 
Field Data Sheets 

No. 1 & No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber Stack 

13 
Run No. 1 

Field Data Sheets 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: Cherokee Brick and Tile Test Date: 4/1912007 

Source: No,1 and No.2 DLA Stack Run Number: 1 

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5/26A 

1-1 0.43 0.t•55i z.lz 

1-2 0.34 0.5831 1.67 

1-3 0,36 0.6000 1.77 

1-4 

1-5 

1-6 

2-1 

2-2 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

2-6 

K-Factor 

4.92 

0.42 

0,43 

0.34 

0.41 

0.6481 

0,37 

0.6557 

0.5831 

0.6403 

2.07 

2.12 

1.67 

0.6083 

2.02 

OO•1- 

355 67 

355 69 

355 

356 

354 

355 

1.82 

70 

72 

73 

74 

0.46 0.6782 2.26 355 75 

0.44 0.6633 2.16 355 77 

355 77 

0.6083 1.82 354 

1.23 354 

0.37 

0.25 0.5000 

8O 

79 

0.39 0.6187 1.89 354.8 73.3 

15 

ENTEC SERVICES INC. 

EPA METHOD 9 VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 

•CA•ON: •¢o. 

=MISSIONS SOURCE: • L• 

D•T•CE FROM SOURCE: 

OI•C•ON FO• •U•E: 

CONDITIONS DURING OBSERVATION: START END 

WIND DIRECTION FROM: 

WIND SPEED: 

AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 

WET-BULB TEMPERATURE: 

SKY CONDmONS: 

BACKGROUND COLOR: 

PLUME COLORi 

CLOCK TIME: 

SECONDS SECONDS 

13 0 0 0 D 

1• ODD 

MIN 0 15 30 45 

150000 

17 [) • •_• O 

•, • O O0 

l•O 0 • • 

• O0 O o 

=•ODDO 

•000 

•oo• 

EII•SSIONS POINT 

SUN 

• WIND DIRECTION 

PLUME & STACK 

SYMBOL KEY 

140 

DRAW NORTH ARROW 

SUN LOCATION UNE 

CONDENSED WATER IN THE PLUME? •J •) 

ATTACHED: DETACHED: 

VE CORRESPONDS TO COMPLIANCE TEST RUN NO.: 

SECONDS SECONDS 

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 

OBSERVERS NAME: (PRINT) 

OBSERVERS SIGNATURE: 

OBSERVATION TEST DATE: 

ERFORMED BY: 

CERTIFIED BY: CAA• 

CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION DATES: LECTURE: 

r•+ 

ENTEC SERVICES, INC. 

TOTAL MINUTES OBSERVED: 

HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE: 

ALLOWABLE OPACITY: (PERCENT) 

No. SMA'$ EXCEEOING ALLOWABLE: 

CERTIFICATION NUMBER: (ADEM) 

17 
Run No. 2 

Field Data Sheets 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: Cherokee Brick and Tile Test Date: 4/1912007 

Source: No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack Run Numbe• 2 

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA• EPA METHOD 5/26A 

1-1 

1-2 

1-3 

1-4 

1-5 

1-6 

2-1 

2-2 

2-3 

2-4 

2-5 

0.42 

0.44 

0.43 

0.36 

0.28 

0.32 

0.40 

0.38 

0.34 

0.34 

0.41 

K-Factor 

4.94 

2-6 0.30 

0.37 

u.u481 2.07 

0.6633 2.17 

0.6557 2.12 

0.6000 1.78 

0.5292 1.38 

0.5657 1.58 

0.6325 1.98 

0.6164 1.88 

0.5831 1.68 

352 78 

352 78 

352 79 

353 79 

353 80 

352 80 

352 80 

353 81 

353 82 

0.5831 1.68 354 82 

0.6403 2.03 354 83 

0.5477 1.48 351 84 

0.6054 1.82 352.6 80.5 
o•o°• 

o EEE 

l 

-I 
ENTEC SERVICES INC. 

EPA METHOD 9 VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 

N 

..•s,o,s souRcE: •L 

co. o o cE: 0 

DI•oN Eo• SOURCE: 

CONDITIONS DURING OBSERVATION: START 

WIND DIRECTION FROM: 

END 

WiND SPEED: 

AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: 

WETBULB TEMPERATURE: RH% 

SKY CONDmONS: 

PLUME BACKGROUND: 

BACKGROUND COLOR: 

PLUME COLORi 

CLOCK TIME: 

EMmSIONS P•NT 

<• SUN 

• WIND DIRECTION 

PLUME & STACK 

SYMBOL KEY 

DRAW NORTH ARROW 

CONDENSED WATER IN THE PLUME? M • 

ATTACHED: DETACHED: 

VE CORRESPONDS TO COMPUANCE TEST RUN NO.: 

SECONDS SECONDS SECONDS SECONDS 

MIN 0 15 30 45 

•O•DO,O 

•00• 

•o •0• 

• 0 

450000 

• 0 0 0 O 

• 00.0 0 

.ODO• 

MIN 0 15 30 45 

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: 

OBSERVERS SIGNATURE: 

OBSERVATION TEST DATE: 

•ERFORMED BY: 

CERTIFIED BY: 

0'7 

ENTEC SERVICES, INC. 

c A,LI. 

CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION DATES: LECTURE: 

TOTAL MINUTES OBSERVED: 

HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE: 

ALLOWABLE OPACITY: (PERCENT) 

No. SMA'S EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE: 

CER, TIFICATION NUMBER: (ADEM) 

F,E•: •/•'Vo7 

21 
Run No. 3 

F•e,d Data Sheets 
ENTEC Services, Inc. 

16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 

Client: Cherokee Brick and Tile Test Date: 4/1912007 

Source: No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack Run Numbe•. 3 

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN CHLORIDE HYDROGEN FLOURIDE FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD 5/26A 

1-2 0,42 0.6481 2.07 356 82 

1-3 0.32 0,5657 1.58 356 85 

1-4 0.37 0.6083 1.83 356 86 

1-5 0,41 0.6403 2.03 357 89 

1-6 0.33 0.5745 1.63 355 88 

2-1 0.38 0.6164 1.88 357 88 

2-2 0,44 0.6633 2.17 357 90 

2-3 0.35 0.5916 1.73 357 90 

2-4 0.36 0.6000 1.78 358 91 

2-5 0.33 0.5745 1.63 359 92 

2-6 0.28 0.5292 1.38 359 92 

K-Factor 

4.94 0.37 0.6037 1.81 356.8 87.9 

23 
0 

oi 
ENTEC SERVICES INC. 

EPA METHOD 9 VISIBLE EMISSION OBSERVATION FORM 

BULB TEMPERATURE: 

pu•e BACKGRO..D: 5V. y- • • 

PLUME COLOR: 

SECONDS 

DRA•N NORTH ARROW 

CONDENSED WATER IN THE PLUME? I• • 

ATrACHED: DETACHED: 

VE CORRESPONDS TO COMPLIANCE TEST RUN NO.: 

SECONDS SECONDS SECONDS 

OBSERVATION TEST DATE: q- lq 0 '7 

'-"RFORMED BY: ENTEC SERI/ICF.•, INC. 

CERTIFIED BY: • J_ /I/ 

CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION DATES: LECTURE: 

HIGHEST SiX MINUTE AVERAGE: /_(•/ 

ALLOWABLE OPACITY: (PERCENT) 

No. SMA•J EXCEEDING ALLOWABLE: 

CE .RTIFICATION NUMBER: (ADEM) 

25 
Control Room Process Data 

2 ̧6 
,Production Data 

The following information was received by email from Mr. Jim Owens of Cherokee Brick 

And Tile Company for the testing performed at their facility in Macon, Georgia, on April 

19, 2007. 

The brick being fired were queen size in both kilns. 

The production data during the test for the emission rate was: 

Lingl Kiln No. 1 (Queen) = 16.52 tons of fired brick per hour 

Lingl Kiln No. 2 (Queen) = 16.83 tons of fired brick per hour 

The limestone usage was 186.83 pounds/hour. 

The average differential pressure of H20 was: 

06:00 am 9:00 am 0.73 

09:00 am 12:00 noon 0.70 

12:00 noon -03:00 pm 0.72