alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SHARE

# User Facilities

              -  User Portal 
              -  Building Technologies Research and Integration Center (BTRIC) 
              -  Carbon Fiber Technology Facility (CFTF) 
              -  Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences (CNMS) 
              -  Center for Structural Molecular Biology (CSMB) Program 
              -  High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) 
              -  Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) 
              -  National Transportation Research Center (NTRC) 
              -  Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF) 
              -  Spallation Neutron Source (SNS) 

The Frontier supercomputer enables researchers across the scientific community to acquire unparalleled accuracy in their simulations and achieve research breakthroughs more rapidly than ever before.

Each year, more than 3,200 scientists from universities, laboratories and private industry around the world conduct experiments at ORNL’s scientific user facilities. ORNL’s user facilities offer a diverse set of tools for experiments across a range of fields, including biology, materials and energy sciences, physics, engineering, and chemistry. ORNL’s user facilities include world-leading facilities for neutron scattering, high performance computing, material and nanoscale research, and additive manufacturing.

Access to ORNL user facilities is through the review and approval of user proposals, and depends on the scientific merit, suitability of the user facilities, and the appropriateness of the work to DOE objectives. DOE requires ORNL to execute user agreements, typically with a researchers’ institution, prior to granting access to a user facility.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80267]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22573]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Integrative Activities; Cancellation of 
Meeting

AGENCY: National Science Foundation.

ACTION: Notice; cancellation of meeting date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The National Science Foundation published a notice in the Federal 
Register September 6, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-20063 at 89 FR 72901, 
concerning a meeting of the Advisory Committee for Integrative 
Activities. The meeting scheduled for Monday, September 30, 2024, at 1 
p.m. (ET) is cancelled.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Crystal Robinson 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#84e7f6f6ebe6edeaf7c4eaf7e2aae3ebf2"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="096a7b7b666b60677a49677a6f276e667f">[email protected]</span></a> or 703-292-8687.

    Dated: September 26, 2024.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024-22573 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
An equal opportunity employer 

Thomas M. Gray 

211(b) Technical Manager 

1220 L Street, Northwest

Washington, DC 20005-4070

Tel 202-682-8480 

Fax 202-682-8270 

E-mail grayt@api.org

October 16, 2009 

Karl Simon 

Director 

Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. 

Mail Code: 6406J 

Washington, DC 20460 

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: Second Draft Final 

Report Gasoline TAME Vapor Condensate - A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Study in Rats with 

Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments 

(Study No. 00-6128) 

Dear Mr. Karl Simon: 

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the 

following information for EPA review and approval as partial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative 

Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation: 

• Second Draft Final Report: Gasoline TAME Vapor Condensate A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation 

Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity 

Assessments (Study No. 00-6128)

• Reviewer Checklist 

The Second Draft Final Report addresses all EPA and independent reviewer comments as indicated, with page 

citation, in the Reviewer Checklist. 

When the RG receives EPA’s approval of the second draft report, the final study report will be submitted to you at 

the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Transportation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the 

requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). If you require further 

information, please contact Tom Gray by mail at this address. 

Regards, 

Thomas M. Gray 

Encl (2): 

Second Draft Final Report: Gasoline TAME Vapor Condensate A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation 

Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity 

Assessments (Study No. 00-6128) 

 Reviewer Checklist 

 

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
United States Office of Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency 

Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI)

 Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 21-204 Date: September 9, 2021 

Subject: Announcing New FEGLI Premiums 

Purpose 

The purpose of this Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) is to notify agencies 

of the new FEGLI premiums rate changes. 

New FEGLI Premiums 

Effective October 1, 2021, FEGLI premium rates will change for some types 

of coverage. Premium rates for Basic Insurance for employees and PostRetirement Basic Insurance with 50% Reduction and No Reduction will 

increase. Most premium rates for Option A, Option B, and Option C will 

decrease. Premium rates for older age bands of Options B and C will 

increase. The full list of FEGLI premium rates effective October1, 2021 is 

included in Attachment 1. 

Effective Date 

The effective date for the new premiums is October 1, 2021. Payroll offices 

must apply the new premiums the first pay period beginning on or after that 

date. 
FEGLI Benefits Administration Letter 21-204 

2 

Payroll Office Notification 

OPM’s Financial Reporting and Analysis Staff will notify payroll offices of the 

new premiums through a BAL in the 300 series. 

Updated Information on the Web 

A notice describing these changes is available in the Federal Register

(https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-19475). The FEGLI premium rates 

will be updated on the FEGLI web site (www.opm.gov/healthcareinsurance/life-insurance) in October 2021. 

We will update the FEGLI Handbook to reflect the new information. Until the 

updates are ready, employees should be informed of the changes by their

agency. 

If you have any questions regarding this Benefits Administration Letter, 

please contact Marthine Mason-Martin, Program Analysis Officer, Life and 

Ancillary Benefits at (202) 606-1413 or email at Fegli@opm.gov. 

 

Sincerely, 

 

Laurie E. Bodenheimer 

Associate Director 

Healthcare and Insurance
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-16-00476-CV

Jim WEYNAND,

Appellant

v.

Hugh LONG,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-08332

Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION, JUSTICE BARNARD, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Hugh Long, recover his costs of this appeal from 

appellant, Jim Weynand.

SIGNED December 5, 2018.

_____________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
#### Mrs. A. J. MIDGETT v. STATE.

No. 18822.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 23, 1934.

Baskett & De Lee, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge. 6

Conviction for perjury; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

The record is here without statement of facts or bills of exception. All matters of procedure appear regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.
ATTACHMENT 2 

TO 

BAL: FERS Credit for Certain Government Service Performed Abroad
VERIFYING CERTAIN SERVICE PERFORMED ABROAD IS CREDITABLE UNDER 

SECTION 321 OF PUBLIC LAW 107-228 

Information About the Applicant 

Name: Date of Birth: Social Security Number: 

Information About the Individual Who Performed The Service 

(If that individual is not the applicant)

Name: Date of Birth: Social Security Number: 

Information About the Period of Service 

Agency and Location of Employment: Dates of Creditable Service: Total Creditable Service 

(Years/Months/Days) 

Service Credit Requirements 

Yes No 

1. Was the service performed abroad after December 31, 1988, and before 

May 24, 1998, under a temporary appointment pursuant to sections 309 and 

311 of the Foreign Service Act of 1980? 

2. Was the service performed at a United States diplomatic mission, consular 

post (other than a consular agency), or other Foreign Service post abroad? 

3. Did the individual who performed the service satisfy all eligibility 

requirements under regulations of the Department of State (as in effect on 

September 30, 2002) for a family member limited non-career appointment 

at the time the service was performed? (Individuals not employed by the 

Department of State while performing such service should be treated as if 

they were so employed for the purposes of this requirement.) 

4. Would the service have been creditable under FERS had it been performed 

before 1989 and had the appropriate service credit deposit been paid? 

5. Is the service otherwise creditable under FERS or any other retirement 

system for employees of the United States Government (disregarding title II 

of the Social Security Act)? 

6. Does the total service for this period of service, and all other periods of 

service the individual is claiming credit for under Section 321 of Public 

Law 107-228 performed after December 31, 1988, and before May 24, 

1998, equal 90 days or more? 

If the answers to items 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6 are YES and the answer to item 5 is NO, the service qualifies 

for credit under Section 321 of Public Law 107-228. The individual must complete a deposit for the 

service, and the agency where the service was performed must pay the Government contributions for 

the service. 

If an answer to items 1, 2, 3, 4,or 6 is NO, or if the answer to item 5 is YES, then the service does not 

qualify for credit under Section 321 of Public Law 107-228. Provide applicant with a written decision 

explaining why the service is not creditable and explaining the applicant’s appeal rights.
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-18-00177-CV

____________________

IN THE INTEREST OF B.S.

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 18-9467

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

The appellant, B.S., filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion is 

voluntarily made by the appellant prior to any decision of this Court. See Tex. R. 

App. P. 42.1(a)(1). No other party filed a notice of appeal. We grant the motion and 

dismiss the appeal.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

 ________________________________

LEANNE JOHNSON

 Justice

 
2

Submitted on May 23, 2018

Opinion Delivered May 24, 2018

Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
#### Maurice A. Roens, Plaintiff, v. Ruth Ratkin et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

March 21, 1958.

*George J. Sandler*for plaintiff.

*Frederick S. Abrams*for defendants.

A. David Benjamin, J.

Motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and on the additional ground that this plaintiff is not the proper party in interest to bring this action.

On January .22, 1957, Herman Bosenbloom, then aged 85 -and the father of the plaintiff son and defendant daughters, by deed conveyed to the defendants certain real property in the county of Kings. Plaintiff alleges that at the time of such conveyance the grantor was senile and incompetent, did not know the nature and quality of his acts, that the transfer was fraudulent and thus seeks to set aside the conveyance to defendants.

*856Section 210 of the Civil Practice Act requires every action to be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest unless otherwise specifically provided. The real party in interest is the one who by substantive law has title, legal or equitable, to the claim or demand. Since the grantor, Herman Rosenbloom, is alive, legal or equitable title to the claim or demand is his.

A grantor, if competent, certainly has the right to convey his property freely and without hindrance. There is no legal mandate compelling a parent to hold realty for the benefit of all his heirs or that it be apportioned among them. If it be assumed that the grantor was incompetent at the time the deed was executed, then such transfer made by one of unsound mind, but not judicially declared so, is voidable and not absolutely void. Only the grantor or a subsequently appointed committee may move to set aside such a conveyance.

In *Finch*v. *Goldstein*(245 N. Y. 300, 303) the court stated: *“ Until the appointment of a committee neither the State nor anyone else has any power or control over his property or any authority to act in his behalf.*He alone remains in possession of his property and can dispose of it. If as a fact he be incompetent at the time he acts, *his transactions may be set aside at his election either by himself or by a committee subsequently appointed.”*(Emphasis supplied.)

Plaintiff herein has no interest, legal or equitable, in the claim or demand. He is not the proper party in interest. Accordingly, the motion is granted and the complaint is dismissed.

Settle order.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,__________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A14A1922. VALENTE RODRIGUEZ MORENO v. THE STATE.

Valente Rodriguez Moreno was convicted of two counts of child molestation

on October 18, 2013. On November 13, 2013, trial counsel filed a timely notice of

appeal. Moreno retained new counsel and on November 19, 2013, he filed an

“Unperfected Motion for New Trial” and a “Motion to File Out of Time Appeal,”

presumably because the motion for new trial was not filed within 30 days of entry of

the judgment of conviction. See OCGA § 5-5-40 (a). The trial court has not entered

an order on either motion. Therefore, the notice of appeal filed in this case is

premature until disposition of the motion for new trial. Brown v. State, 208 Ga. App.

726 (431 SE2d 726) (1993); O’Kelly v. State, 196 Ga. App. 860 (1) (397 SE2d 197)

(1990).

Accordingly, this case is hereby REMANDED to the trial court for disposition

of the motion for new trial. Because the premature notice of appeal will become

effective upon entry of a denial of a new trial motion, no new notice of appeal need

be filed if the motion is denied. See O’Kelly, supra at 860; Shirley v. State, 188 Ga.

App. 357 (373 SE2d 257) (1988).

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,__________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

08/01/2014

August 01, 2014
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
#### THOMPSON et al. v. KORUS.

No. 10486.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 21, 1939.

Harry A. Nass and Jno. A. Bitter,. Jr., both of San Antonio, for appellants.

Russell B.. Wine, W. R. Parker/ and Leonard Brown, all of San Antonio, for appellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

Briefs have not been filed herein by the parties, accordingly the appeal will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Court of Civil Appeals Rule No. 38.
**Exhibit 32.2**
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In      connection with the Quarterly Report of SFH II Acquisition Corp. (the "Company")      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armen      Karapetyan, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to      ss.      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|   |                                                                                                      |                                |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                      | /s/                Armen Karapetyan |
|   | Armen                KarapetyanPrincipal                Financial OfficerNovember                14, 2007 |

----
#### O’NEIL v. STATE.

No. 19291.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 12, 1938.

Frank P. Hutchison, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the $tate.

*467MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Unlawfully carrying a pistol is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for thirty days.

The complaint and information appear regular. The facts heard upon the trial are not brought forward for review. No complaint of the rulings of the court has been presented by bill of exception. In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906****OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ferrellgas PartnersFinance Corp. for the three months ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacity and onthe date indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. at the dates andfor the periods indicated within the Report.     The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is subject to the “knowledge” and“willfulness” qualifications contained in 18 U.S.C. 1350(c).     This certification is being furnished to the SEC and is not to be deemed “filed” with the SECfor purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18.In addition, this certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any registrationstatement of Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp. or other filing of Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp.made pursuant to the Exchange Act or Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specificallyidentified as being incorporated therein by reference.Dated: June 7, 2007                                                       /s/ James E. Ferrell   James E. Ferrell   Chief Executive Officer                                                      /s/ Kevin T. Kelly   Kevin T. Kelly   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer    ***** **As required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, a signed original of this written statement has been providedto Ferrellgas Partners Finance Corp.**
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nine Mile Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,**Michael Christensen**, Principal Accounting Officer of the            Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **MICHAELCHRISTENSEN** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**Michael Christensen**

Principal Accounting Officer

November 10, 2008

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its            staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.