alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

WAYNE TURNER, *

*

Petitioner, * No. 12-331V

* Special Master Christian J. Moran

*

v. * Filed: July 25, 2014

*

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Attorneys’ fees and costs; award

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * in the amount to which

* respondent does not object.

Respondent. *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Elizabeth Muldowney, Rawls, McNelis, and Mitchell P.C., Richmond, VA, for 

Petitioner;

Justine Daigneault, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION ON FEES AND COSTS1

On July 24, 2014, respondent filed a stipulation of fact concerning final 

attorneys’ fees and costs in the above-captioned matter. Previously, Mr. Turner

informally submitted a draft application for attorneys’ fees and costs to respondent 

for review. Upon review of petitioner’s application, respondent raised objections 

to certain items. Based on subsequent discussions, Mr. Turner amended his

application to request $35,789.15, an amount to which respondent does not object. 

The Court awards this amount.

On May 25, 2012, Mr. Turner filed a petition for compensation alleging that 

the trivalent influenza (“flu”) vaccination, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury 

 

1

The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 

2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), 

the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other 

information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special 

master will appear in the document posted on the website.
Table (the “Table”), 42 C.F.R. §100.3(a), and which he received on October 27, 

2010, caused him to develop a brachial plexopathy or brachial neuritis. Mr. Turner

received compensation based upon the parties’ stipulation. Decision, filed April 

28, 2014. Because Mr. Turner received compensation, he is entitled to an award of 

attorneys’ fees and costs. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(e). 

Mr. Turner seeks a total of $35,289.15 in attorneys’ fees and costs for his

counsel. Additionally, in compliance with General Order No. 9, petitioner states 

that he incurred $500.00 in out-of-pocket litigation expenses while pursuing this 

claim. Respondent has no objection to the amount requested for attorneys’ fees 

and costs. 

After reviewing the request, the Court awards the following:

a. A lump sum of $35,289.15 in the form of a check made payable to 

petitioner and petitioner’s attorney, Elizabeth M. Muldowney, for 

attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs available under 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa-15(e).

b. A lump sum of $500.00, payable to petitioner, Wayne Turner, for 

costs he incurred in pursuit of his petition.

The Court thanks the parties for their cooperative efforts in resolving this 

matter. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk, Marc Langston, at (202) 

357-6392.

 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran

Christian J. Moran

Special Master
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lodestar Mining, Incorporated
      (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the
      Company’s Quarterly Report, on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
      2008 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Ian McKinnonIan
                McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer, Director, Principal
              Executive
                Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal
              Accounting
                Officer, Treasurer
#### BENTLEY v. STATE.

No. 20187.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

Jack Acrey, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary; punishment, three years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bill of - exceptions, hence no question is presented for review. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.
## NO. 12-09-00053-CR IN THE COUR T OF APP EALS TWELFTH COURT OF APP EALS D ISTR ICT

TYLER, TEXA S

FER RELL SC OTT, § APPEAL F ROM THE 114TH APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRI CT COURT OF TH E ST ATE OF TEX

AS, APP ELL EE § SMI TH CO UN TY

, T EXAS MEMORA NDUM OPIN ION PER CU RIAM This appea l is being dismi ssed for w ant of jurisdiction. Appellant was convicted of murder for whic h sentenc e wa s imposed on November 5, 1992. He subseque ntly filed a motion for DNA testing, which the trial court denied by wr itten order signe d on Au g ust 27, 2008. Appellant now seeks to appe al his conviction and sente nce as well as the denial of hi s motion for DN A testing. We dismiss for wa nt of jurisdiction. Texa s Rule of Appellate Procedur e 26.2 provide s that an appe al is perf ecte d when notice of appea l is filed within thi rty days af t er t h e day se ntence is imposed or suspended in open c ourt, or afte r the da y the trial court enters a n appea lable orde r. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26 .2 (a )( 1) . W he n a tim e ly motion for new tria l has bee n filed, notice of appea l shall be filed within ninety days a ft er the sentenc e is imposed or suspended in open court. T EX . R. A PP . P. 26 .2 (a )( 2) . A pp e lla nt d id n ot f ile a motion for new trial. Ther efor e, his notice of appea l from his conviction and se ntence was due on or bef ore D ece mber 5, 1992, a nd his notice of appe al from the or der de nying his mot ion for DNA testing was due on or

befor e S ep t em b er 26, 2008. Howeve r, Appe llant did not file his noti ce of appea l until F ebrua

ry 18, 2009 and did not file a motion for extension of time to file his not ice of appea l as permitted by Texa s Rule of Appellate Procedur e 26.3. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 26 .3 (a pp e lla te court may e xtend time for f iling notice of appea l if, within fifteen da ys after deadline f

or filing notice2

of appe al, appe llant fi les notice of a ppeal in trial c ourt and motion complying with Texas Rule of App e ll a te Pr o c e d u r e 1 0

. 5 ( b ) in ap p e ll a te c o u r t)

. M o r e o v e r , o n D e c e mb e r 2 8 , 1 9 9 4 , th is c ourt aff irmed Appellant’s conviction for mur der. See Sc ott v . St ate , 894 S.W.2d 810 (Tex. A pp.–Tyler 1994, pet. re f’d)

. On Fe br ua ry 20 , 2 00 9, thi s cou rt no tif ie d A pp e lla nt tha t th e inf or ma tio n r e c e ive d in thi s appea l does not show the jurisdiction of this court. App ell ant was f urther notifie d that the appe al
wo uldbe dis mis se d u nle ss the inf or ma tio n w a s a me nd e d, on or be fo re Ma rc h 2, 20 09 , to s ho w this
c ou rt ’s jurisd ic tio n. Ap pe lla nt’ s cou ns e l re sp on de d tha t he doe s n ot o pp os e dis mis sa l of the app e a l. Ba se d u po n th e fo re go ing a na lys is, we c on c lud e that w e do no t have ju ri sdic tio n o f this
app e a l. A c c or din gly , th e app e a l is dismiss ed for want of juri sdiction

. Opinion delivere d Marc h 11, 2009. P an el consi s t ed of

W ort hen, C. J. , G r i

f f i t h, J. , and H oyl e, J.

(DO N OT PUBLISH)
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)




(Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:




The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      October 19, 2009
                                        By:
                                        /s/ Zishen
      WuZishen
      WuPresident
      and CEODated:
      October 19, 2009
                                        By:
                                        /s/
      Sam
      YuSam
      YuChief
      Financial
Officer
**Exhibit      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In      connection with the Quarterly Report of SFH I Acquisition Corp. (the "Company")      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armen Karapetyan,      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of      the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

|                               |                                                                 |                              |
|-----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
| Date: August              14, 2007 |                                                                      | /s/ Armen              Karapetyan |
|                                    | Armen                KarapetyanPrincipal                Financial Officer |

----
Exhibit 34.7



|     |                          |                     
|---- | ------------------------ | --------------------
|LOGO |                          | Plante & Moran, PLLC
|     | 10 South Riverside Plaza
|     | 9th Floor               
|     | Chicago, IL 60606       
|     | Tel: 312.207.1040       
|     |                          | Fax: 312.207.1066   
|     |                          | plantemoran.com     

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors

National Tax Search, LLC

We have examined National Tax Search, LLC (the Company) compliance with Securities and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB Servicing
Criteria, set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Security and Exchange Commissions Regulation AB for the National Tax Search TaxQ system (the Platform) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015. The Company has determined that only
certain servicing criteria, 1112(d)(1)(ii), 1122(d)1(iv), 1122(d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122(d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii), are applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this
report. The Company has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities performed by it with respect to the Platform covered by this report.

Management is responsible for the Companys compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assertion about the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Companys compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included a selection of a
sample of transactions and compliance activities related to the Platform during the examination period and determining whether the Company processed those transactions and performed those activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Our
testing of selected transactions and compliance activities was limited to calculations, reports, and activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures did not include determining whether errors may have
occurred prior to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Companys compliance with the servicing criteria.

In our opinion, managements assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31,
2015 for the Platform is fairly stated in all material respects.

/s/ Plante & Moran, PLCC

Chicago, IL

January 18, 2016



LOGO
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTERU. S. Office of Personnel Management

 Number:  P-99-03  Date:  January 26, 1999   

 Subject: JOINT BENEFIT OFFICER/PAYROLL OFFICE MEETING               

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that there will be an Interagency AdvisoryGroup (IAG) meeting on Tuesday, February 9, 1999 at 1:00 - 3:00 p.m. in the OPMAuditorium, 1900 E St. NW, Ground Floor.  

The agenda will include the upcoming FEGLI open season and the Administration’s long-term care proposal for Federal employees and retirees.  This will be a joint meeting withthe benefits officers group and you are encouraged to attend.

If you have any questions please contact us on (202) 606-0606.

Robert A. Yuran, ChiefFinancial Policy StaffRetirement and Insurance Service
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JASON KOEHLER, I,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 528 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the three-month
period ending October 31, 2007 of Techs Loanstar, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Gary Pizzacalla, Chairman, President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1. The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.


 /s/ GARY PIZZACALLA
 ----------------------------------
 Gary Pizzacalla

 President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
 Principal Financial Officer and Sole Director


Date: November 30, 2007
Retirement and Benefits 

Quality Benefits for the Federal Family

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number 14 - 113 Date: 10-1-14

Subject: Revised Present Value Factors and Discount Factors 

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) uses present value factors in a variety of civil 

service retirement computations. Present value factors change periodically to conform to 

changes in economic assumptions and demographic factors adopted by the Board of 

Actuaries of the Civil Service Retirement System. Discount factors also change when the 

Board of Actuaries changes economic assumptions related to the expected rate of investment 

return earned by the retirement fund. We are issuing this Benefits Administration Letter 

(BAL) to inform agencies that the present value factors and the discount factors have been 

revised as of October 1, 2014. The revised factors were published in the Federal Register on 

May 21, 2014. You can access CSRS and FERS Present Value Factors Effective October 1, 

2014 at https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/05/21/2014-11762/civil-serviceretirement-system-present-value-factors, and 

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2014/05/21/2014-11756/federal-employeesretirement-system-present-value-factors

OPM uses present value factors to compute reductions to: 

• Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and Federal Employees Retirement System 

(FERS) retirees’ benefits when the retirees elect the Alternative Form of Annuity; 

• CSRS and FERS benefits with a CSRS component when the retirees elect to credit refunded 

service that ended before March 1, 1991, without paying the redeposit owed for the service; 

• CSRS and FERS benefits when the retirees marry after retirement and elect to provide 

survivor annuity benefits; 

• Retirees’ benefits when the retirees elect to credit Nonappropriated Fund Instrumentality 

(NAF) service for retirement purposes under Public Law 104-106 or Public Law 107-107; 

and, 

• Retirement benefits for individuals with certain types of retirement coverage errors who can 

receive credit for service by taking an actuarial reduction under the provisions of the Federal 

Erroneous Retirement Coverage Correction Act. 

OPM also uses discount factors to compute the reduction to annuity benefits when retirees 

elect to credit their NAF service under either of the aforementioned public laws. 
 Retirement and Benefits 

Quality Benefits for the Federal Family

See Benefits Administration Letters 03-102, dated January 22, 2003, and 96-108, dated 

September 6, 1996 for details about the NAF computations.) The revised Discount Factors 

are attached 

Kenneth J. Zawodny Jr. 

Associate Director, 

Retirement Services 

Attachments: Discount Factors Effective October 1, 2014
SAMPLE 

Executive Development Plan Template 

The Executive Development Plan is meant to serve as the "blueprint" for all short-term and long-term develo

will enhance an executive’s performance. Developmental activities, whether participating in a detail assignmreading a book, should develop a broader perspective and deeper knowledge of the agency and Federal gobe updated periodically (e.g., at least once every three years). 

Name/telephone number John Smith, 202-555-1111 

Series/grade ES-0340 

Position title Associate Director of Public Affairs 

Occupational field Public Affairs 

Developmental Goals 

• I am new to the SES and would like to improve my leadership skills to effectively and efficiently mana• Keep up-to-date in the Public Affairs field 

Employee signature DatSupervisor signature DatERB signature (optional) Dat
I plan to develop the following Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) and associated Competencies: Leading Peop

Results Driven (Accountability), and Building Coalitions (Political Savvy) DEVELOPMENTAL ACTIVTIES

DATE STARTED DATE

COMPLETED

EX

1. Training Course: OPM Federal Executive Institute Course: Leadership for a Democratic Society: Historical Foundations for Leading Contemporary Transformations 

11/9/08 12/5/08 

Gain bConstimoderinsightand arplan to performnetwor

2. Books: 

1) It’s Your Ship, by Captain 

Michael Abrashoff 

2) Generations at Work, by Ron 

Zemke, Claire Raines, and Bob Filipczak 

3) Find other books on similar 

topics (will add over time) 

5/1/08 1/1/10 

Incorprecomthese bmanag

3. Rotational Assignment: 60-day detail assignment with Department of Treasury. My detail assignment will be to manage the Acquisition Division 

2/1/09 4/15/09 

To gaithe Acmanagcareer 

4. Webinars/Pod casts:

1) American Management 

Association Web cast: How Ordinary People Become Extraordinary Leaders 

2) Find other webinars on similar 

topics (will add over time) 

4/1/08 4/1/10 

Incorprecomthese wleader

5. Other: Work with executive coach over several sessions 8/1/08 1/1/10 

Discusbarriertechniqconflicsolvingfamily do not
# Economic Development

ORNL’s Economic Development group develops and implements industry cluster strategies, and supports entrepreneurial development programs. Our efforts with local, state, and national partners help transfer ORNL-developed technologies and know-how to the commercial marketplace, creating new companies, new jobs, and increased US competitiveness.

### Contact

JesseSmith

smithj1@ornl.gov

## RevV

RevV is a voucher program for Tennessee companies that offsets the costs of working with leading-edge experts in advanced research facilities to solve complex manufacturing challenges in product development and process innovation.

Learn More**
SHARE

# Brian Arrington

              -  Fact Sheets 
              -  Timeline of ORNL Science 
              -  Leadership Team 
              -  Interactive Map 
              -  Diversity 
              -  Organization 
              -  Who we are, aren't 
              -  Community Engagement 
              -  History 
              -  Honors and Awards 
              -  Environmental Protection 
              -  Quality (ISO9001) 
              -  Research Integrity 
              -  Working at ORNL 

Brian Arrington

## Chief Human Resources Officer

Chief Human Resources Officer Brian Arrington oversees the lab’s talent recruitment and retention along with HR operations, labor relations, and benefits. Arrington, a highly accomplished executive who is especially skilled in all aspects of successful human resources management and operations, joined ORNL in 2023. Arrington is committed to attracting and retaining top talent. He does this by creating a culture in which team members are empowered with the confidence needed to execute and to succeed.

A passionate and energizing leader, Arrington is dedicated to the development of top talent and has implemented career development and transition plans, created training and apprenticeship programs, and catalyzed succession planning initiatives. He is known for his ability to translate strategy into action, creating rewarding and collaborative work environments, and for “walking the talk.” 

Prior to joining ORNL, Arrington served as the Deputy Project Manager for Site Separation with CNS supporting the DoE directive to separate the Pantex Plant and the Y-12 National Security Complex. Additionally, he spent 15 months with Microsoft as a Senior Director for Capacity and Resource Optimization, developing strategies to improve hiring, retention, and training. From 2005 to 2021, he served in various organizations managed by Bechtel, taking on roles guiding overall HR operations, handling employee relations, and overseeing succession planning and employee development. Arrington has also served as Vice President for Kwajalein Range Services, a partnership between Bechtel and another Department of Defense (DoD) contractor, located in the Marshall Islands and Vice President and Industrial Relations Operations Manager for Bechtel’s Construction Services.

Arrington, as SHRM-SCP earned his B.S. in Business Management from the University of Maryland and M.A. in Organizational Behavior and Change Management from the University of Phoenix.