alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 May 9, 2007
    
    /s/ THOMAS L. MITCHELL

Thomas L. MitchellSenior Vice President and Chief Financial Officerof Noble Corporation
Exhibit 10.11


 





Sales Agreement


 


 


	Customer: China National Tree Seed Corporation	Contract No.:
	 	 
	Supplier: Zhejiang FLS Mushroom Co., Ltd	Signed at:


 


Contract Date:


1. Product, unit, quantity, price per unit,
and total amount


	No.	Product Name	Unit (Ton)	Quantity	Price Per Unit (RMB)	Total Amount (RMB)	Note
	1	 	 	 	 	 	 
	2	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	Total amount (RMB) (including tax):	 


 


2. Payment method and term: Customer will
pay Supplier once they receive a value-added tax invoice.


 


3. Quality requirements: to meet the national
requirements for related agricultural products.


 


4. Place and method of delivery: the warehouse
in No. 888 Tianning Street, Lishui, Zhejiang. Customer is responsible for picking up.


 


5. Transportation and expenses: Customer
picks up the goods and bears the transportation costs.


 


6. Package standard and requirements: the
packages should be qualified for multiple loads and unloads and to endure long-distance transportation. Package standard is to
ensure the goods will reach destination safely and in undamaged condition with normal multiple loads and unloads.


 


7. Inspection standards and methods: to
meet the quality standard as required by Customer. If Customer does not express any disagreement on the quality upon receiving
the goods, it will be considered as qualified.


 


8. Financial responsibility: as required
by law, the governing law of this agreement is the law of signing place. This agreement will take effect as of the date of signing
and is binding to both parties. None of the parties could make changes to or terminate this agreement unilaterally within the execution
period of this agreement.


 


9. Others: if any other issues occur, supplemental
agreements can be added after negotiation between both parties. Supplemental agreement is equally effective as this agreement.


 


10. Effectiveness and
changes: this agreement will take effect once the seals of both parties are affixed. Any changes can be made with written consent
of both parties.


 




     


     


    

 


For Corporate Chop:


 


	Customer	Supplier
	Name:  China National Tree Seed Corporation  	Name:  Zhejiang FLS Mushroom Co., Ltd  
	Address: No. 20 Anyuan Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China	Address: No. 888 Tianning Street, Lishui, China
	Legal Representative: Weicheng Zhu	Legal Representative: Yefang Zhang
	Bank:	Bank:
	Account No.:	Account No.:
	Tax No.	Tax No.
	Postcode: 1000029	Postcode:  323000
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7383
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JOHN HENRY MCFADDEN, Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. C. Weston Houck, Chief District Judge. (CR-90-430, CA-92-1960-3-2-BC) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.John Henry McFadden, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Gordon Baker, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM:Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988) petition. Appellant's case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1988). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Appellant that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district courtorder based upon the recommendation. Despite this warning, Appellant failed to object to the magistrate judge's recommendation. The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge's recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned that failure to object will waive appellate review. Wright v. Collins , 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985). See generally Thomas v. Arn , 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Appellant has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  I, Brian Baker, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form
    10-K of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-C8
    (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
    asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
    of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
    to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
    and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
    this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
    instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
    this report on Form 10-K.

  In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
  provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

  KeyBank National Association (as successor to KeyCorp Real Estate Capital
  Markets, Inc.), as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC
  Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, National
  Association, as Trustee and Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank,
  National Association, as Custodian, and Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Senior
  Trust Advisor.


    Dated:   March 28, 2014



    /s/ Brian Baker
    Signature

    President and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 15-309 Date: December 2015

Subject: Federal Employees Benefits Cost Factors for Fiscal Year 2016 

This letter provides the imputed cost factors related to the Federal Employees Benefits Programs 

for Fiscal Year (FY) 2016. 

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS PROGRAM 

The FEHBP cost factors for FY 2016 are as follows: 

Quarter

1st $1,535

2nd 1,556

3rd 1,577

4

th

 1,598

FY 2016 $6,266

RETIREMENT AND LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAMS 

Agencies should use the FY 2015 cost factors provided in Benefits Administration Letter 

 (BAL) 15-304, “Fiscal Year 2015 Factors for Calculating Imputed Costs” for calculating the FY 

2016 Cost Factors for Retirement and Life Insurance for the first three quarters of FY 2016. 

Those FY 2015 factors can be obtained from the OPM Web site at 

http://www.opm.gov/retirement-services/publications-forms/benefits-administrationletters/2015/15-304.pdf

A BAL providing the FY 2016 annual imputed cost factors for all civilian benefit programs will 

be posted on the OPM Web site on or before August 15, 2016. 

If you have any questions about this letter, please send an email to FinancialBALS@opm.gov or 

call us on 202-606-0606. We look forward to assisting you. 

Kolo Babagana 

Acting Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Richard S. Pzena, asChief Executive Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 9, 2009 | /s/ RICHARD S. PZENA             |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |                             |
|                         | Name: Richard S. Pzena           |
|                         | Title: *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

1

----
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

**Section 1350 Certification**

**Inconnection with this quarterly report of ML Transtrend DTP EnhancedFuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,2007 as filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”),I, Robert D. Ollwerther, Chief Executive Officer and President of Merrill LynchAlternative Investments LLC, the manager of ML Transtrend DTP EnhancedFuturesAccess LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

2. The informationcontained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.
|                                       |   |                      |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------|--------|
| Date: August 14, 2007                 |   |
|                                  |   |                      |   |
| By                                    |   | /s/ Robert D.  Ollwerther |   |
| Robert D. Ollwerther                  |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and President |   |
| (Principal Executive Officer)         |   |

 

----
United States

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 21-302 Date: March 2021

Subject: March 2021 Headcount 

This is a reminder for all payroll providers, including cross-service providers (e.g. National 

Finance Center (NFC), Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), etc.), to submit the 

semiannual Headcount for the March 2021 reporting period no later than March 31, 2021.

The semiannual Headcount reporting (March and September) provides the OPM with a snapshot 

of agency-wide enrollment for participants in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), 

Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), Federal Employees Retirement System –

Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-RAE), Federal Employees Retirement System – Further 

Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE), Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) 

Program, and/or the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Program. 

The March 2021 Headcount reporting period is for payroll paid during the first 15 days of March 

for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles. For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period is February 1 

through February 28, 2021.

NOTE: All Payroll providers are required to use OPM’s Headcount Collection System (HCS) 

to input data and submit OPM Forms 1523 and 2812A electronically. HCS also provides an

electronic upload feature using a standardized template. 

To ensure payroll providers have the necessary knowledge to successfully submit Headcount 

reports electronically during the March 2021 season, HCS Standard Operating Procedures and 

training materials have been developed. 

For questions about the new electronic collection process, please contact the Headcount Support 

Team at HeadcountSupport@opm.gov.

Headcount reports must be submitted no later than March 31, 2021. If report submission 

delays or difficulties are anticipated, please call Ms. Yadira Vega at 202-606-4842, Olayla 

Ruffin at 202606-1498 or email Fundsmanagement@opm.gov. 

NOTE: Standard Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) reports should not be 

delayed because Headcount submissions are not ready/complete. 

Sherri Jordan 

Associate Chief Financial Officer
#### LEWIS v. STATE.

No. 20179.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

*1011Jack Acrey, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment assessed being twelve years in the penitentiary.

The indictment is in proper form. The record contains no statement of facts and no bills of exception. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 10.7
 
 PROMISSORY NOTE – B-4
 
  $50,000.00
July 11, 2012
 
 FOR VALUE RECEIVED, HPEV, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Borrower”), hereby promises to pay to the order of SPIRIT BEAR LIMITED (the “Lender”), the principal sum of FIFTY THOUSAND 00/100 DOLLARS ($50,000.00) together with interest thereon from the date of this Note on the unpaid principal balance.  Interest shall accrue at a rate of one and twenty-eight one hundredths of a percent (1.28%) per annum.  Principal and all accrued interest under this Note shall be due and payable on the sooner of (i) one hundred eighty (180) calendar days from the date of issuance first set forth above or (ii) three (3) business days after the Next Equity Financing (defined below).
  This Note is issued pursuant to that certain Note and Warrant Purchase Agreement dated August 9, 2012 (the “Purchase Agreement”).
  All payments shall be made in lawful money of the United States of America at the principal office of the Borrower, or at such other place as the holder hereof may from time to time designate in writing to the Borrower.  Payment shall be credited first to the accrued interest then due and payable and the remainder applied to principal.  This Note shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California as applied to agreements among California residents entered into and to be performed entirely within California.
  The outstanding principal balance and unpaid accrued interest on this Note shall be due and payable within three (3) business days after the closing of the Borrower’s next transaction or series of related transactions in which the Borrower sells equity securities (excluding equity securities sold and issued pursuant to exercise of options issued under equity compensation plans, exercise of the Warrants issued under the Purchase Agreement, or under the terms of the Purchase Agreement) (the “Next Equity Financing”); provided, that the Borrower may, in its sole discretion, repay the principal and accrued interest on this Note at any time.  The Borrower hereby expressly waives presentment, demand for payment, dishonor, notice of dishonor, protest, notice of protest, and any other formality.
  Upon default, the unpaid principal balance of this Note together with all accrued but unpaid interest shall become due immediately at the option of the holder hereof.  Default shall be the failure of the undersigned to pay interest or principal when due, or the filing by or against the undersigned of a proceeding under any provision of the federal Bankruptcy Code, as amended, or under any other bankruptcy or insolvency law.
   HPEV, INC.By /s/ Timothy HassettTimothy Hassett, Chief Executive Officer
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Payroll Office Letter 

Number: P-00-31 Date: November 14, 2000

SUBJECT: ADDITIONAL HEALTH BENEFITS OPEN SEASON INFORMATION

In Payroll Office Letter 00-28, we referred you to Benefits Administration Letter (BAL)

00-404 -- Significant Plan Changes. BAL 00-404 listed certain events that effect the

2001 Open Season. Since the issuance of BAL 00-404, additional Open Season

events have been announced. We now refer you to BAL 00-406,

 -- Significant Plan Changes - Part 2. BAL 00-406 can be downloaded from our

website at www.opm.gov/asd; if you are unable to do so, please call or email us and

we will send you a copy. 

We draw your special attention to the following information presented in BAL 00-406,

which will require action on your part:

Table 1: Plans dropping out of the FEHB Program for 2001

Two additional plans will not participate in the FEHB Program as of January 1, 2001:

PacifiCare of Ohio (R8) and the Family Health Plan in Wisconsin (WH). No new

enrollments in these plans should be accepted and current enrollees must elect a

new plan during the Open Season.

Table 3: Plan mergers

Two additional plans will merge into others for 2001 and lose their enrollment codes:

 Generations Family Health Plan (8B) and Prudential HealthCare (JB). You will need

to transfer enrollees in these plans to Aetna U.S. HealthCare (JN) and Partners

National Health Plan (EQ), respectively, unless they elect a different plan during the

Open Season.
 

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

Table 5: Enrollment code changes

 We will change the enrollment code of the Rocky Mountain HMO from “88” to “XJ”

effective on January 1, 2001. Current enrollees must be transferred to “XJ”, unless

they choose a different plan during Open Season.

 

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7774

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RODNEY CURTIS HAMRICK,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,

District Judge. (CR-91-56, CA-99-90-5)

Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rodney Curtis Hamrick, Appellant Pro Se. David Jonathan Horne,

Special Assistant United States Attorney, Dayton, Ohio; David Earl

Godwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Rodney Curtis Hamrick seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.

2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district

court. See United States v. Hamrick, Nos. CR-91-56; CA-99-90-5

(N.D.W. Va. Sept. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**EXHIBIT23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**The Board of Directors
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6426

TIMOTHY A. DEROCHER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

ROBERT H. MAUNEY, Warden of Northside

Correctional Institution; HENRY MCMASTER,

Attorney General of South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.

(4:05-cv-01027-RBH)

Submitted: June 22, 2006 Decided: July 3, 2006

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy A. DeRocher, Appellant Pro Se. Melody Jane Brown, OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, South

Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
*

While DeRocher ultimately filed objections, they were clearly

untimely.

- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Timothy A. DeRocher seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The

district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2000). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised DeRocher that failure to file

timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

Despite this warning, DeRocher failed to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.*

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of

the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been

warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins,

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474

U.S. 140 (1985). DeRocher has waived appellate review by failing

to timely file specific objections after receiving proper notice.

Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal.
- 3 -

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED