alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.1





STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE





Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Stanley
A. Hirschman, Principal Executive Officer of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:





The
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 28, 2010
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Stanley A Hirschman.Stanley
      A. Hirschman, Principal Executive OfficerDated:
      May 12, 2010
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 2298** 

DONALD VAN METER , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. JM & LF INC., d/b/a A ction A utomotive , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. Theresa C. Buchanan , Magistrate Judge. ( 1:14

- cv - 01074

- LMB

- TCB )

Submitted : April 16, 2015 Decided: April 20, 2015

Before AGEE and KEENAN , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion
.
Donald Van Meter , Appellant Pro Se. William Edward Hassan, Fairfax, Virginia , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Donald Van Meter seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order granting the Defendant’s motion to set aside default judgment. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and

c ollateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). The order Van Meter seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Nor cou ld it have been certified for immediate appealability under Rule 54(b). In re Bryson , 406 F.3d 284, 287

- 88 (4th Cir. 2005); Equip. Fin. Grp., Inc. v. Traverse Computer Brokers , 973 F.2d 345, 347

- 48 (4th Cir. 1992). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of December 1, 2012, by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization
Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Operating Advisor and U.S. Bank, National Association as Trustee, Certificiate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-C4 (the “Agreement”).
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from December 1, 2012 through December
31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations
under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the period December 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13thday of March 2013.







___________________________





Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank









|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | 
|---------------------- |
EXHIBIT 10.4
 PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT MARKED BY AN (***) HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR
CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.
 Amendment to the Global Agreement
  WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 WHEREAS
 IT IS AGREED
 1.
    
    § 1 Reimbursement/Handling1.1
    
    The Parties agree that only the terms for handling the reimbursement in Germany shall apply.
Other territories are out of scope and have to be agreed separately if applicable.2.
    
    § 2 Amount of reimbursement2.1
    
    The first sentence of Article 2 of the LH/LX Amendment shall be replaced by the following
sentence:Given its purely provisional and compensatory nature, the Amadeus ACOs partial
reimbursement of the LH/LX Preferred Surcharge of an amount of (***) per ticketed and
charged segment is subject to the following conditions:2.2
    
    The last sentence of Article 2 of the Amendment shall be replaced by the following sentence:




---



##### 



In case of a Reduction, such affected EBOOKERS Locations (or EBOOKERS) shall inform Amadeus
immediately. In this circumstance, the reimbursement hereunder shall be reduced according
to the Reduction. For clarification, in case of an Increase of the LH Preferred Surcharge
by Lufthansa, Amadeus is not obligated to increase the reimbursement hereunder.2.3
    
    The following two conditions are added to Article 2 of the Amendment:
 
    
    The applicable segment has been booked via a German Office ID in the territory
of Germany.
    
    EBOOKERS warrants that it will provide Amadeus Germany only with those ADMs for
reimbursement for that part of the (***) LH/LX Preferred Fare Surcharge
reimbursement that has not been charged by EBOOKERS Locations to its traveller
clients. For example, if an EBOOKERS Locations charges its customer any amount
above (***) for bookings affected by the LH/LX Preferred Fare Surcharge, then such
excess amounts will not be included in any ADMs.
 3.
    
    § 6 Duration of reimbursement4.1
    
    Article 6 clause 1 and clause 2 of the LH/LX Amendment is deleted and replaced with the
following:This Amendment, including any reimbursements of the LH/LX Preferred Surcharge in any and
all territories, shall automatically end without the need of a formal termination on
28th of February 2010.
   Amadeus IT Group, S.A.
    
    EBOOKERS LTD/s/ Stephane Durand

Signature
    
    /s/ Despas Gilles

SignatureName: Stephane Durand
    
    Name: Despas GillesTitle: Director
    
    Title: VP Business to BusinessDate: 11/3/2010
    
    Date: 8/3/2010
----

| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Techs Loanstar, Inc. for the period ended October 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Techs Loanstar, Inc.                                                                          |

|   | /s/ Barry HollanderName: Barry HollanderTitle: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director            (Principal Financial Officer) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----
* Local Rule 47.5.1 provides: "The publication of

opinions that merely decide particular cases on the basis of

well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the

public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that

Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-30930

Conference Calendar

__________________

SAMUEL WILLIAMS, JR.,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

EDWIN LOMBARD; HARRY F. CONNICK,

District Attorney,

 Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

USDC No. 95-CV-2238

- - - - - - - - - -

December 20, 1995

Before DAVIS, STEWART, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Samuel Williams argues that the district court abused its

discretion in dismissing his pro se, in forma pauperis, 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 civil rights complaint as frivolous. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for essentially the reasons given

by the district court. 

AFFIRMED.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

 

MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

 

J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp.

383 Madison Avenue

31st Floor

New York, New York 10179

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for JP Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-C8,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-Certificates, Series 2012-C8

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012 ( the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting Period" ) :

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects   throughout the Reporting   Period.

 

 

 

 

February 25, 2015

 

/s/  Brian Smith 

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Envision Solar International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) I, Howard Smith, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial/Accounting Officer) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






/s/Howard Smith

Date:  May 14, 2010Howard Smith, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial/Accounting Officer)





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
SHARE

# Graeme Murdoch

Graeme Murdoch

## DirectorSecond Target Station Project 

Graeme Murdoch has over 35 years of progressive experience working in technical and management capacities in a particle accelerator and fusion engineering environment. 

Before assuming his current position, he held various management roles within ORNL including Neutron Technologies Division Director at SNS with responsibility for several key technical systems including the mercury target and instrument beamline engineering, and US ITER Non-Nuclear Systems Division Director at the US ITER Project with responsibility for the central solenoid magnet and plasma-facing vacuum and diagnostic systems. 

Prior to joining ORNL, Murdoch worked as a Senior Project Engineer at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, England on the ISIS Spallation Neutron Source specializing in managing design, procurement, installation and commissioning of engineering equipment and system upgrades to the accelerator and target systems. 

Murdoch graduated in mechanical engineering from the University of West England, Bristol. He is a fellow of the UK Institute of Mechanical Engineers and a registered Chartered Professional Engineer with the UK Engineering Council.
#### Michael Longo, Plaintiff, *v.*Shaker Heights Development, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Trial Term, Albany County,

April 1, 1958.

*279
      *William B. Grotty*and *Julian B. Erway*for plaintiff.

*Jay Cox O’Brien, Bruce B. Sullivan*and *Charles B. Sullivan*for defendant.

Donald S. Taylor, J.

In this action plaintiff sues for damages for breach of contract. Upon the trial the jury disagreed and was discharged. Thereafter pursuant to section 457-a of the Civil Practice Act the defendant moved for judgment in accordance with its motion for a directed verdict made at the close of all of the evidence upon which the court had expressly reserved its decision. In April, 1952 the parties completely abrogated, by mutual consent, their pre-existing written contract for the performance of grading services and substituted in its place a new and different parol agreement which gave plaintiff a right known as a *profit a prendre*to take soil from defendant’s premises upon a royalty payment basis. *(Rodgers*v. *Rodgers,*235 N. Y. 408, 410; *Schwartzreich*v. *Baumam-Basch,*231 N. Y. 196, motion for reargument denied 231 N. Y. 602.) Such a right constitutes a sale of an interest in land which, to be enforcible in an executory status, must be created by a grant in writing and which cannot be created by parol. *(Saratoga State Waters Corp.*v. *Pratt,*227 N. Y. 429, 443; *Taylor*v. *Millard,*118 N. Y. 244, 251; *Cronkhite*v. *Cronkhite,*94 N. Y. 323; *Lacustrine Fertilizer Co.*v. *Lake Guano & Fertilizer Co.,*82 N. Y. 476, 484; *Pierce*v. *Keator,*70 N. Y. 419; *Mathews Slate Co.*v. *Advance Ind. Supply Co.,*185 App. Div. 74, 77; *Post*v. *Pearsall,*22 Wend. 425, 433; see, also, *Tyler*v. *Windels,*186 App. Div. 698, affd. 227 N. Y. 589.) In these circumstances the Statute of Frauds bars the plaintiff’s cause of action. (Real Property Law, § 242.) Assuming, *arguendo,*that the parties intended their oral bargain only to modify the written agreement, plaintiff’s position still would be untenable. Concededly, the latter conveyed no interest in the defendant’s real property and its modification by parol would not serve to vary its legal effect in this respect. *(Clark*v. *Fey,*121 N. Y. 470, 476-477; *Hill*v. *Blake,*97 N. Y. 216, 222.) The doctrine of part performance which plaintiff’s brief urges is a creation of equity and is not recognized in actions at law. *(Matter of Ditson,*177 Misc. 648, 653; *Walter*v. *Hoffman,*267 N. Y. 365, 368; *Burns*v. *McCormick,*233 N. Y. 230; *Woolley*v. *Stewart,*222 N. Y. 347; 1 Pomeroy on Equity Jurisprudence [5th ed.], § 103.) The defendant’s motion is granted with an appropriate exception to plaintiff and judgment may be entered, with costs, accordingly.

Settle order on notice of three days.
SHARE

# Facilities

The Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences

Materials Characterization Core

Low-Activation Materials Development and Analysis (LAMDA) Laboratory

The Ultra-Trace Forensic Science Center

Transuranium Analytical Lab

Multicharged Ion Research Facility

Chemistry Support Laboratory
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

 

I, Brian E. Schaaf, certify that:

 

1.                                    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ford Credit Auto Owner Trust 2012-C (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                    I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: The Bank of New York Mellon, as indenture trustee of the issuing entity, and U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as owner trustee of the issuing entity.

 

Dated March 18, 2015

 

 
|   | /s/   Brian E. Schaaf                              |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|   | Brian   E. Schaaf                                  |
|   | Vice   President and Assistant Treasurer           |
|   | Ford   Motor Credit Company LLC, as Servicer       |
|   | (senior   officer in charge of servicing function) |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3485 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3485

   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 501(c)(4) 
   entities from participating in, or intervening in (including the 
   publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 10, 2015

Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham of New Mexico introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 501(c)(4) 
   entities from participating in, or intervening in (including the 
   publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``501(c)(4) Reform Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. 501(C)(4) ENTITIES PROHIBITED FROM PARTICIPATING IN, OR 
              INTERVENING IN (INCLUDING THE PUBLISHING OR DISTRIBUTING 
              OF STATEMENTS), POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS.

    (a) In General.--Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an entity 
                if the entity participates in, or intervenes in 
                (including the publishing or distributing of 
                statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in 
                opposition to) any candidate for public office.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
#### BARTLETT et al. v. GULF PRODUCTION CO.

No. 1428.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Nov. 2, 1933.

Atkinson, Atkinson & Gaugler, of Houston, for plaintiff in error.

B. C. Clark, Jno. E. Green, Jr., and John Broughton, all of Houston, for defendant in error.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This action was brought in the district court of Harris county to recover the possession of a leasehold estate in 64 acres of land in Chambers county. At the conclusion of the evidence, the court gave an instructed verdict for the defendant. The plaintiffs sued out this writ of error.

The brief filed by the plaintiffs in error contains neither assignments of error nor propositions upon which the case should be reversed. We are therefore limited in our consideration to a determination of whether or not there is any fundamental error. 3 Tex. Jur. 812; Roberson v. Hughes (Tex. Com. App.) 231 S. W. 734; W. T. Waggoner Estate v. Sigler Oil Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 284 S. W. 921.

We have examined the record very carefully, and fail to find any fundamental error. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.