alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#                                                     Bryce B  Abbott                                            

###                         Mechanical Testing Technician                      

## Contact

abbottrb@ornl.gov|865.574.4929

## Bio

Bryce Abbott is a technician in the Materials Science and Technology Division at ORNL. He preforms mechanical testing such as creep, tensile, and compression testing. 

## Professional Experience

Creep and tensile testing, Vacuum systems.

## Education

Certificate from Tennessee College of Applied Technology 

## Specialized Equipment

Vacuum systems and electromechanical frames 

## Organizations

Physical Sciences Directorate

Materials Science and Technology Division

Materials in Extremes Section

Mechanical Properties and Mechanics Group
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Point.360 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of  1934;
  and





(2)
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/  Alan R.
      SteelAlan
      R. SteelChief
      Financial OfficerSeptember 28, 2009
#### AUSTIN v. STATE.

No. 18824.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 17, 1937.

Early & Johnson and J. Edward Johnson, of McCartney, McCartney & Johnson, all of Brownwood, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The conviction is for a misdemeanor, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $100 and 30 days in jail.

It was charged in the complaint and information, in substance, that appellant sold to Porter Williams beer containing one--half of 1 per cent., or more, of alcohol by volume and not more than 4 per cent, of alcohol by weight. It was further averred that said sale was made by appellant without first having applied for and secured a license to sell beer. Again, it was averred that Brown county, in which the sale was made, was a dry area, it being shown in the complaint and- information that an election had been ordered and held which resulted in the prohibition of the sale of intoxicating liquors in said county.

Appellant’s motion to quash the complaint and information should have been sustained. Section 4 of article 1, chapter 467, General and Special Laws passed by the 44th Legislature at the Second Called Session (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 4), among other things, provides that it shall be unlawful to sell in any dry area any liquor containing alcohol in excess of one-half of 1 per cent, by volume. Section 12 of article 2 of said act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 667 — 12), among other things, provides, in substance, that if any person sells beer without being licensed he shall be punished by a fine of not less than $25 and not more than $500, or by imprisonment in the county jail not more than one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment. In Ex parte Meadows, 100 S.W.(2d) 702, 704, this court held that section 4, supra, prohibited the transportation of any kind of liquor in a dry area except under certain conditions unnecessary to set forth here. In the course of the opinion it was said: “Article 2 of said ‘Texas Liquor Control Act’ when considered in its entirety appears generally to deal with the regulations for the legal handling of beer, and prescribing penalties for handling same in violation of said regulations.” We think it is clear that that part of section 12, supra, denouncing the sale of beer without being licensed is not operative in dry areas, but relates to such sales in wet areas by persons who had not been duly licensed. Brown county, being a dry area, appellant could not legally have obtained a license for the sale of beer. Manifestly, the prosecution should have proceeded under section 4 of article 1, which *385expressly denounces the sale of intoxicating liquor in dry areas, and not under section 12 of article 2, which relates, among other things, to sales of beer in wet areas without having obtained a license. See Kirby v. State, 126 Tex.Cr.R. 434, 72 S.W.(2d) 285.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 3, 2021

No. 04-19-00416-CV

VILT AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. and Mediation Centers of America, L.L.C.,

Appellants

v.

Ho Kon PARKER and Richard T. Parker,

Appellees

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013-CI-19561

Honorable Rosie Alvarado, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice (not participating)

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice

The panel has considered the appellees’ “Motion for Rehearing En Banc,” and the motion 

is hereby DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 3rd day of February, 2021.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 
  

 
 



 
 May 22, 2014 
 Joe Guido

 Dear Joe, 
 In light of your efforts in
guiding Hansen Medical, Inc. (the “Company”) towards securing a distributor relationship with Adachi Co., Ltd. in Japan (“Adachi”), I am happy to inform you of the Company’s intent to reward you with a commission opportunity
for this transaction. Upon the signing of a distribution agreement with Adachi on or before December 31, 2014, the Company shall pay you a cash amount equal to 3.5% of the initial purchase revenue booked by the Company in connection with the
signing of the distribution agreement. To earn any payment provided for in this letter (i) you must be employed on the payment date, which date shall be no later than ninety (90) days following the signing of the distribution agreement and
(ii) the payment set forth in this letter must be approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. We appreciate your efforts on behalf of the Company and look forward to working with you for a productive and
successful transaction. 
  

			
	Kind regards,
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Christopher P. Lowe

		 	Christopher P. Lowe
		
		 	Interim Chief Executive Officer
		 	Hansen Medical, Inc.
		 	800 East Middlefield Road
		 	Mountain View, CA 94043


  

			
	Acknowledged and Agreed:
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Joe Guido

		 	Joe Guido

 800 East Middlefield Road • Mountain View, California 94043 • T 650.404.5800 

www.hansenmedical.com
**Exhibit
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SFH I Acquisition Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armen Karapetyan,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: August
              14, 2007
            
            /s/ Armen
              KarapetyanArmen
                Karapetyan
              Principal
                Executive Officer
POSTFLIGHT FIELD CHECKLIST

1 / 1 | Page

PIC AIRCRAFT RELATED GSC RELATED

DESCRIPTION INITIALS DESCRIPTION INITIALS

Aircraft Landed and Secured     Save Flight Logs    

Aircraft Disarmed     Print Actual Mission Flown    

Payload Power Down     Modify & Save Mission if Necessary    

Aircraft Power Down     Get Ready for Next Flight    

Inspect Propellers for Condition     GSC END OF DAY

Fill out Mission Card     Power Down Flight & Payload Computers    

Swap Batteries     Remove Charging Batteries    

Get Ready for Next Flight     Power Down Battery Chargers    

PIC END OF DAY Power Down Antenna Tracker    

Disassemble and Remove Payload     Disconnect Comms Equipment    

Remove Flight Batteries     Disconnect Sure Power    

Breakdown Motor Booms     Secure & Pack Equipment    

Download Current Flight Logs          

Pack Transmitter Equipment          

Pack S900 Aircraft          

Secure & Pack Equipment          

Fill Out Appropriate Logs
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
  Certification
    Pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    Form 10-Q
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)
              By:
    /s/  Rene
    R. Joyce   Title:
    Chief Executive Officer of Targa Resources GP, LLC,
    the general partner of Targa Resources Partners LP
    (Principal Executive Officer)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12562]

# ACTION:

Closed meeting.

In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1009(a)(2), the Department of State announces a meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) to take place on October 30, 2024, at the Department of State, Washington, DC.

Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board will be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the Department with a continuing source of independent advice on all aspects of arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, outer space, critical infrastructure, cybersecurity, the national security aspects of associated technologies, international security, and related aspects of public diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting will include classified discussions related to the Board's ongoing studies on current U.S. policy and issues regarding biotechnology and military-civil fusion strategy, multilateral disarmament structures, and security cooperation and arms transfers.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        For more information, contact Michelle Dover, Executive Director of the International Security Advisory Board, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4930, email:                         *DoverME@state.gov.*

Michelle E. Dover,

Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-23419 Filed 10-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-27-P
|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company      for the periods presented therein. |
|--------|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  July      29, 2010 | /s/      Jacob L. Silverman  |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------|
|                                |               |
|                                | JACOB      L. SILVERMAN      |
|                                | Chief      Financial Officer |

----
#### Ivan GRAYSON v. STATE.

No. 21007.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1940.

R. T. Dickson, of Sweetwater, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in ‘ the penitentiary for two years.

Upon appellant’s written request, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.

*1118PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
----

----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |   |   |                    |
|------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
| Date: January 14, 2013 |   |   |   | /s/ Robert Knight       |
|                   |   |   |   | Robert Knight.          |
|                   |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

----

----
Exhibit 10.4
 
  
 Re: First Amendment to Services Agreement
  Firm APC Services Agreement
 1.
    
    As of the date hereof, Section 3.1(c) is hereby amended to read as follows:Except as otherwise provided in this Section 3.1(c), for each year during the term
of this Agreement after the Initial Years, on or before the forty-fifth (45th) day
prior to an Amended Fee Schedule Date (the Amended Fee Schedule Due Date),
the Service Provider may propose to the Firm an amended Fee Schedule (an
Amended Fee Schedule) that will be in effect for the one-year period
commencing with the applicable Amended Fee Schedule Date. On or before the fifteenth
(15th) day after receiving the proposed Amended Fee Schedule , the Firm may deliver
to the Service Provider a notice of objection to the proposed Amended Fee Schedule
(an Objection Notice). If no such Objection Notice is timely delivered by
the Firm to the Service Provider, then that Amended Fee Schedule shall be binding on
the Parties for the one-year period commencing on the applicable Amended Fee
Schedule Date. If the Firm does timely deliver to the Service Provider an Objection
Notice, the Firm and the Service Provider shall thereafter negotiate with each other
in good faith to agree upon an Amended Fee Schedule. If the Firm and the Service
Provider are unable to agree upon an Amended Fee Schedule within thirty (30) days
after an Objection Notice has been given, then the existing Fee Schedule shall
remain in effect and the Service Provider shall thereafter have the option of
terminating this Agreement in its sole discretion in accordance with Section
9.4 hereof. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, for calendar year
2014, the Service Provider may propose to the firm an Amended Fee Schedule, if any,
on or before the ninetieth (90th) day prior to the Amended Fee Schedule Date for
that year.2.
    
    Except as expressly amended in this First Amendment, the Services Agreement
shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with its terms.




---



##### 



First Amendment
  Very truly yours,American Processing Company, LLC
By: Dolan APC, LLC, its Managing Member/s/ Scott J. PolleiBy: Scott J. Pollei, it Vice President
  Wilford & Geske
 /s/ Lawrence A. WilfordBy: Lawrence A. Wilford, its President
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), we, Benjamin W. Hulburt, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas C. Stabley, Chief Financial Officer of Rex Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 9, 2008



|                                      |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Benjamin W. Hulburt               |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas C. Stabley  
|Benjamin W. Hulburt                   |  |  |  | Thomas C. Stabley      
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rex Energy Corporation and will be retained by Rex Energy Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

----

| Date      May 12, 2010 |   |
|------------------------|--------|
|                   |   |
|                   | By:    | /s/Patrick      Giordano |
|                   | Name:  | Patrick      Giordano |
|                   | Title: | President,      Chief Executive Officer, |
|                   |   | Treasurer,      Chief Financial Officer and |
|                   |   | Director      (Principal Executive, Financial |
|                   |   | and      Accounting Officer) |

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), RichardS. Pzena, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002, that:

 

(1)                                The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 11, 2009 | /s/ RICHARD S. PZENA             |
|--------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                     |                             |
|                     | Name: Richard S. Pzena           |
|                     | Title: *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

----
#### SPENCER v. STATE.

No. 17824.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 11, 1935.

W. A. Wright, C. FI. Tupper, Jr., and Wm. W. Tupper, all of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of possessing spirituous liquor for the purpose of sale, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for 1 year. Pending the appeal of this case, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which the conviction was had has been repealed. See Acts of the 44th Legislature, 2d Called Sess., § 49, article 1 of the Liquor Control Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 49), and also the case of Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, recently decided by this court.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.