alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6087 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6087

**Commission Decision of 23/05/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6087 - ORKLA / REC) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 23.5.2011

C(2011) 3690

PUBLIC VERSION

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

|To the notifying party |

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M. 6087– Orkla/REC Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 15 April 2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking Orkla ASA ("Orkla", Norway) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of Renewable Energy Corporation ASA ("REC", Norway).

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- Orkla: branded consumer goods, aluminium solutions, renewable energy, specialty materials and financial investment

- REC: solar energy solutions [2] .

2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(c) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission

(signed)

Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 129, 30.04.2011, p.4

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
#### FRANZETTI v. FRANZETTI.

No. 7682.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Dec. 23, 1931.

Warren W. Moore and 'Gofer & Cofer, all of Austin, for appellant.

McClendon, C. J.

This appeal, which is from a decree of divorce, is predicated upon the' sole question of the sufficiency of plaintiff’s (appellee’s) petition to support the jurisdiction of the court.

The allegation upon this issue reads: “That he (plaintiff) is an actual bona fide inhabitant of the State of Texas and has resided in said County of Travis for at least six months next preceding the filing of this suit, and that he has resided in the State of Texas for over one year next preceding the filing, of this suit.”

The statutory requirement in this regard (Article 4631) follows: “No suit for divorce shall be maintained in the courts of this State unless the petitioner for such divorce shall at the time of exhibiting his or her petition, be an actual bona fide inhabitant of this State for a period of twelve months, and shall have resided in the county where the suit is filed for six months next preceding the filing of same.”

Actual bona fide inhabitation of this state for twelve months on plaintiff’s part is essential to jurisdiction in a divorce suit, and must be alleged in order to support the judgment. Neither bona fide inhabitation at the time of suit,- nor residence for twelve months, is sufficient. The distinction between bona fide inhabitation and residence has been too often pointed out to require restatement. The authorities supporting these views have been recently collated by Chief Justice Gallagher in Lawler v. Lawler (Tex. Civ. App.) 15 S.W.(2d) 684, 685, from which we quote: “The authorities in this state are unanimous in holding that said provisions are mandatory, and that actual bona fide inhabitancy of the state and residence in the county for the respective periods of time required thereby must be alleged and proved. Haymond v. Haymond, 74 Tex. 414, 419, 12 S. W. 90; Bruner v. Bruner (Tex. Civ. App.) 43 S. W. 796; Gallagher v. Gallagher (Tex. Civ. App.) 214 S. W. 516, 519, par. 5; Dickinson v. Dickinson (Tex. Civ. App.) 138 S. W. 205, 208, pars. 1 and 2; McLean v. Randell (Tex. Civ. App.) 135 S. W. 1116, 1118; Gould v. Gould (Tex. Civ. App.) 244 S. W. 574; Motes v. Motes (Tex. Civ. App.) 229 S. W. 342, 343; Forsythe v. Forsythe (Tex. Civ. App.) 149 S. W. 198; Hunt v. Hunt (Tex. Civ. App.) 196 S. W. 967, 968; Oliver v. Oliver (Tex. Civ. App.) 245 S. W. 1038; Brashear v. Brashear (Tex. Civ. App.) 99 S. W. 568.”

The trial court’s judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
** **

**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Officer Certifications****Pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

**(Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of GlobantS.A (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

 

The annual report onForm 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the Report fairly presents, inall material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: March 29, 2017
### Transport Transports Canada Canada TP 7245E



# AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your na me. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X . Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H , the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard

. This AD has been issued b y the Continuin g Airworthiness Division ( AARDG ) , National Aircraft Certification Branch, Trans p ort Canada, Ottawa, tele p hone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communicat ions Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8 , or 1-800-305-2059 , or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp
2 4-0022 ( 01-2005 ) 

### 1/1 No

. 

### CF-2011-06 Issue Date 

### 26 April 2011



### Number: CF- 2011-06 Subject: Airstair Door – Blocked Water Drainage Path
Effective: 17 May 2011 Applicability: Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Aeroplanes, Models 400, 401, and 402, Serial Numbers 4161 through 4296 Compliance: As indicated below unless already accomplished Background: Several operators have reported difficulties in opening the airstair door. Investigation revealed that the airstair door gearbox drain paths were blocked by sealant, causing water to accumulate and freeze in the gearbox assembly. An airstair door that is unable to be opened could hinder evacuation in the event of an emergency. This directive mandates a one-time inspection and rectification for sealant interfering with the airstair gearbox drain paths.
Corrective Actions: Within 600 hours air time after the effective date of this directive, inspect the gearbox drain paths for blockages and rectify as required, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions in Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-53-48, dated 02 December 2010, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing Airworthiness, Transport Canada.
Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY Derek Ferguson Chief, Continuing Airworthiness
Contact: Miss Helen Tsai, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, facsimile 613-996-9178 or e-mail CAWWEBFeedback@tc.gc.ca or any Transport Canada Centre.
(logo) pwc

 

 

**Report ofIndependent Registered Public Accounting Firm**

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Management of

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.:

 

We have examinedmanagement's assertion, included in the accompanying Certification RegardingCompliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that Prudential Asset Resources,Inc. (the "Company") compliedwiththeservicingcriteriasetforthinItem1122(d)oftheSecuritiesandExchangeCommission's Regulation AB for the Commercial Mortgage-Backed SecurityTransactions - RegAB Portfolio (the "Platform"), as of December 31,2016 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii),1122(d)(3)(i)(C)&(D),1122(d)(3)(ii),1122(d)(3)(iii),1122(d)(3)(iv),and1122(d)(4)(xv),whichthe Companyhas determined are not applicable to the activities performed by it withrespect to the Platform. Exhibit C to management's assertion identifies theindividual asset-backed transactions and securities defined by management asconstituting the Platform. Management is responsible for the Company'scompliance with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express anopinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestationstandards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company'scompliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such otherprocedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examinationincluded testing of selected asset-backed transactions and securities thatcomprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to thePlatform, and determining whether the Company processed those selectedtransactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with theapplicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactionsand servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered bythis report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arisingfrom errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to our tests that mayhave affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Companyduring the period covered by this report. We believe that our examinationprovides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company's compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Company compliedwith the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the yearended December 31, 2016 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all materialrespects.

 

 

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP

February 22,2017

 

 

*PricewaterhouseCoopersLLP, 300 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10017*

*T: (646) 471 3000, F:(646) 471 8320, www.pwc.com/us*

* *
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3608 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt amounts paid 

for aircraft management services from the excise taxes imposed on transportation by air. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 24, 2015 

Mr. TIBERI (for himself, Mr. RENACCI, Mr. KELLY of Pennsylvania, Mrs. 

BEATTY, Mr. STIVERS, Mr. WENSTRUP, and Mr. POMPEO) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and 

Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt 

amounts paid for aircraft management services from the 

excise taxes imposed on transportation by air. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS PAID FOR AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT 

4 SERVICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subsection (e) of section 4261 of 

6 the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding 

7 at the end the following new paragraph: 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3608 IH

1 ‘‘(5) AMOUNTS PAID FOR AIRCRAFT MANAGE2 MENT SERVICES.— 

3 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—No tax shall be im4 posed by this section or section 4271 on any 

5 amounts paid by an aircraft owner for aircraft 

6 management services related to— 

7 ‘‘(i) maintenance and support of the 

8 aircraft owner’s aircraft; or 

9 ‘‘(ii) flights on the aircraft owner’s 

10 aircraft. 

11 ‘‘(B) AIRCRAFT MANAGEMENT SERV12 ICES.—For purposes of subparagraph (A), the 

13 term ‘aircraft management services’ includes 

14 assisting an aircraft owner with administrative 

15 and support services, such as scheduling, flight 

16 planning, and weather forecasting; obtaining in17 surance; maintenance, storage and fueling of 

18 aircraft; hiring, training, and provision of pilots 

19 and crew; establishing and complying with safe20 ty standards; or such other services necessary 

21 to support flights operated by an aircraft 

22 owner. 

23 ‘‘(C) LESSEE TREATED AS AIRCRAFT

24 OWNER.— 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3608 IH

1 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—For purposes of 

2 this paragraph, the term ‘aircraft owner’ 

3 includes a person who leases the aircraft 

4 other than under a disqualified lease. 

5 ‘‘(ii) DISQUALIFIED LEASE.—For pur6 poses of clause (i), the term ‘disqualified 

7 lease’ means a lease from a person pro8 viding aircraft management services with 

9 respect to such aircraft (or a related per10 son (within the meaning of section 

11 465(b)(3)(C)) to the person providing such 

12 services), if such lease is for a term of 31 

13 days or less. 

14 ‘‘(D) PRO RATA ALLOCATION.—If any 

15 amount paid to a person represents in part an 

16 amount paid for services not described in sub17 paragraph (A), the tax imposed by subsection 

18 (a), if applicable to such amount, shall be ap19 plied to such payment on a pro rata basis.’’. 

20 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

21 this section shall apply to amounts paid beginning after 

22 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 
 Contacts:Investor contact:
Chris Brewster, CFO
281.892.0128
cbrewster@cardtronics.comMedia contact:
Joel Antonini, VP Marketing
281.552.1131
joel.antonini@cardtronics.com
 CARDTRONICS
COMPLETES ACQUISITION OF 7-ELEVEN, INC. ATM BUSINESS
 HOUSTON, TX, July 20, 2007 ®
   About Cardtronics, Inc.  ® ® ® ® ® ® ®




---



##### 



® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ® ®
 About 7-Eleven  ®
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 

AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Kranti Resources, Inc. (the"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, BenGill, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the      Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the20th day of August, 2007.

 

***/s/ Ben Gill                       ***

Chief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer
# L_2014044EN.01005501.xml

| 14.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 44/55 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 44/55

---

Corrigendum to Directive 2011/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 174 of 1 July 2011
  )

On page 95, at the end of Article 9(b),

for:

‘... and that the manufacturer has complied with the requirements set out in points (f) and (g) of Article 7;’,

read:

‘... and that the manufacturer has complied with the requirements set out in points (g) and (h) of Article 7;’.

---
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14 AND 15d-14
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED
CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TM Entertainment and Media, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light
of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
   Date: May 15, 2008
    /s/ Theodore S. GreenName:
    Theodore S. GreenTitle:
    Co-Chief Executive Officer and
Interim Chief Financial Officer
SHARE

# Quality (ISO9001)

              -  Fact Sheets 
              -  Timeline of ORNL Science 
              -  Leadership Team 
              -  Interactive Map 
              -  Diversity 
              -  Organization 
              -  Who we are, aren't 
              -  Community Engagement 
              -  History 
              -  Honors and Awards 
              -  Environmental Protection 
              -  Quality (ISO9001) 
              -  Research Integrity 
              -  Working at ORNL 

ORNL's Quality Assurance Program (QAP) supports excellence in our science and technology missions through development of a quality culture that contributes to scientific and operational excellence, research integrity, and continual improvement by defining the processes to deliver quality products and services to both our internal and external customers. Our QAP Description is the Laboratory's highest level quality management document and describes the UT-Battelle approach to the integration of quality principles and methodologies into work planning and control processes to address contractual quality requirements and to achieve consistent success.

## Fundamentals of the ORNL QA Program

                    - Implemented to meet the requirements conveyed through DOE Order 414.1D, Quality Assurance and 10 CFR 830 Subpart A, Quality Assurance Requirement.
                    - Features ISO 9001:2015 as the Laboratory's consensus standard.
                    - Structured with the flexibility to apply additional standards, requirements, or guidance documents such as ASME NQA-1 and ANSI Z1.13 on a project or process-specific basis based on potential risk factors and customer needs.
                    - Common-sense application of QA principles and requirements to fit the needs of each activity, process, project, or program based on the DOE-mandated concept of graded approach.
                    - Conveyed to Laboratory staff and management through the web-based Standards Based Management System, ORNL's institutional mechanism for ensuring that applicable laws, regulations, orders, policies, and best practices are adequately translated and incorporated into policies and procedures.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jose Cisneros, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Casita Enterprises, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Casita Enterprises, Inc.


Date: November 10, 2009             By: /s/ Jose Cisneros
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                    Name:  Jose Cisneros
                                    Title: Chief Executive and Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Casita Enterprises, Inc. and will be retained by Casita Enterprises,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
(logo)**Prudential**

**PrudentialAsset Resources**

PGIMReal Estate Finance

2100Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201

Tel214-777-4500

 

Abusiness of Prudential Financial, Inc.

 

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association

CommercialMortgage Servicing

MACD1086

550South Tryon Street, 14th Floor

Charlotte,North Carolina 28202

Attention:Asset Manager

 

RE:         **WFRBS 2012-C8**

Period: **January 1, 2018 to December 31,2018(the "Reporting Period")**

 

 

**Annual ComplianceStatement**

 

I, Joni Brown-Haas, in my capacity asPresident and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the"Company") hereby certify with regard to the Company's role asSub-Servicer under the Sub-Servicing Agreement, (the "Agreement")dated as of August 1, 2012, pertaining to the above-referenced certificates,that:

 

       (i)           areview of the activities of the Company under the Agreement  during theperiod noted above, and  of the performance of the Company under theAgreement during the  relevant  period  has been made under mysupervision, and

 

     (ii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all itsobligations under the Agreement throughout the relevant period, and

 

   (iii)           to thebest of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled itsobligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects, and

 

    (iv)           theCompany has maintained an effective internal control system over the servicingof mortgage loans including the Loans serviced by the Company, and

 

     (v)           theCompany has not received any notice regarding qualification or challenging thestatus of the Lower Tier REMIC or the Upper Tier REMIC as a REMIC, from the IRSor any other governmental agency or body.

 

Effectiveas of February 22, 2019

 

 

/s/Joni Brown-Haas

JoniBrown-Haas

Presidentand Managing Director

PrudentialAsset Resources, Inc.