alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 194 (Monday, October 7, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81075]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23094]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-12315-01-R1]


Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Order on Petition for 
Objection to State Operating Permit for Turnkey Landfill

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final order on petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator signed 
an order dated August 16, 2024 denying a petition dated February 9, 
2024 from Darlene Ball, Rep. Tony Caplan, Diana Carpinone, James 
Contois, Jacquelyn Elliott, John Hurley, Margaret Hurley, Katie Lajoie, 
Rebecca MacKenzie, Susan Richman, Nelia Sargent, Mary Schissel, Jon 
Swan, John Tuthill, Cynthia Walter, and Janet Ward. The petition 
requested that the EPA object to a Clean Air Act (CAA) Title V 
operating permit issued by the New Hampshire Department of 
Environmental Services (NH DES) to Turnkey Landfill located in 176 
Rochester Neck Road, Rochester, New Hampshire.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andre Turner, EPA Region 1, (617) 918-
1216, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83d7f6f1ede6f1adc2ede7f1e6c3e6f3e2ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3b6f4e49555e49157a555f495e7b5e4b5a155c544d">[email protected]</span></a>. The final order and petition are available 
electronically at: https://www.epa.gov/title-v-operating-permits/title-v-petition-database.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The EPA received a petition from Darlene 
Ball, Rep. Tony Caplan, Diana Carpinone, James Contois, Jacquelyn 
Elliott, John Hurley, Margaret Hurley, Katie Lajoie, Rebecca MacKenzie, 
Susan Richman, Nelia Sargent, Mary Schissel, Jon Swan, John Tuthill, 
Cynthia Walter, and Janet Ward dated February 9, 2024, requesting that 
the EPA object to the issuance of operating permit no. TV-0062, issued 
by NH DES to Turnkey Landfill located in 176 Rochester Neck Road, 
Rochester, New Hampshire. On August 16, 2024, the EPA Administrator 
issued an order denying the petition. The order itself explains the 
basis for the EPA's decision.
    Sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2) of the CAA provide that a petitioner 
may request judicial review of those portions of an order that deny 
issues in a petition. Any petition for review shall be filed in the 
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit no later 
than December 6, 2024.

    Dated: October 1, 2024.
David Cash,
Regional Administrator, Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2024-23094 Filed 10-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-6895
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus JAMES KEVIN NELSON, Claimant - Appellant, and ONE 1990 MERCEDES BENZ 560SL, VIN WDMCA39E8LA505310, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson E. Legg, District Judge. (CA-95- 2546-L) Submitted: September 25, 1997 Decided: October 9, 1997 Before LUTTIG, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James Kevin Nelson, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Charles Kay, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Appellant appeals the district court's order denying his motion for return of property under Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nelson , No. CA-95-2546-L (D. Md. June 10, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, H. Kerr Taylor, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of the Company that, to my knowledge:



1.
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
     May 6, 2011
     /s/ H. Kerr TaylorH. Kerr Taylor
Chief Executive Officer
















---
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Interim Report of Go Solar USA, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Tyson Rohde, Chairman
of the Board, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material aspects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: 
September 15, 2010





/s/
      Tyson RohdeTyson
      RohdeChairman
      of the Board and CEO(Principal
      Executive Officer andPrincipal
      Financial
Officer)
| (logo) WELLS

           FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor 

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A |  (logo) Together we’ll go far

  |
|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------------|
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023041EN.01002601.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 3.2.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 41/26 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11010 – INEOS / SINOPEC / ETHYLENE JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 41/11)

1.

On 26 January 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023041EN.01002601-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | INEOS AG (‘INEOS’, Switzerland), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | China Petroleum and Chemical Corporation (‘Sinopec’, China), state owned enterprise, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | INEOS Sinopec Tianjin Petrochemicals Limited (‘Ethylene JV’, China), newly created joint venture, controlled by INEOS and Sinopec. |

INEOS and Sinopec will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of the Ethylene JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a joint venture.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are the following:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | INEOS is a privately owned conglomerate that produces a range of chemicals including petrochemicals, specialty chemicals and oil products, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Sinopec is a petroleum and petrochemical group headquartered in Beijing. |

3.

The business activities of the Ethylene JV will be the development, construction and operation of an ethylene plant and associated derivatives in the People’s Republic of China.

4.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2023041EN.01002601-E0002) it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11010 – INEOS / SINOPEC / ETHYLENE JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023041EN.01002601-E0001)  [OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2023041EN.01002601-E0002)  [OJ C 366, 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of Altisource Residential Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 (“Form 10-K”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: February 7, 2013By:/s/ Ashish PandeyAshish Pandey  Chief Executive Officer
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstancesset forth in LocalRule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-31088

(Summary Calendar)

EDITH W. COPELAND, wife of Thurman Copeland;

THURMAN COPELAND,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

versus

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC., formerly known

as Marriott Hotels Inc., ET AL,

Defendants,

and

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC., formerly known

as Marriott Hotels Inc.

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Louisiana

(95-CV-4028)

May 22, 1997

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*
2

Edith W. Copeland tripped and fell in the French Quarter when she attempted to step onto

a curb. At the time of her fall, employees of the Marriott Hotel were painting the exterior of the

building, and the placement of the painting materialsrequired some pedestriansto step into the street

to get around the equipment. Mrs. Copeland was one of these pedestrians. She looked down the

street, saw no traffic, made her way into the street and around the equipment, and tripped and fell as

she attempted to make it back onto the sidewalk. She suffered injuries, including a broken hip.

Mrs. Copeland sued Marriott for negligence. The case was removed to federal court on the

basis of diversity. The district court granted Marriott’s motion for summary judgment, holding that

although Marriott owed Mrs. Copeland a duty, there was no genuine issue ofmaterialfact suggesting

that Marriott breached that duty. Mrs. Copeland appeals.

We have reviewed the law, briefs, and the record and conclude that the district court did not

err in granting Marriott’s motion for summary judgment.

AFFIRMED.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6842

ANDREW DAVID WHITE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

DUANE TERRELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., 

Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00122-JAB-LPA)

Submitted: August 28, 2014 Decided: September 3, 2014

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrew David White, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, 

III, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Andrew David White seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and dismissing as untimely White’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that White has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny White’s motion for a certificate of appealability, deny 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3531 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3531

To amend title 28, United States Code, to include claims relating to a 
response under the Comprehensive Response, Compensation, and Liability 
Act among those claims for which the Federal Tort Claims Act provides a 
                    remedy, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2015

 Mr. Westmoreland introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 28, United States Code, to include claims relating to a 
response under the Comprehensive Response, Compensation, and Liability 
Act among those claims for which the Federal Tort Claims Act provides a 
                    remedy, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Exemptions for EPA Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS EXCEPTION TO EXCEPTION FOR CERTAIN CLAIMS 
              ARISING UNDER THE COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE, 
              COMPENSATION, AND LIABILITY ACT .

    Section 2680(a) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by 
inserting ``(other than a discretionary function or duty in connection 
with a response under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation, and Liability Act)'' after ``discretionary function or 
duty''.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 
    Dated:
August 17, 2007/s/ James J. MermisJames J. MermisChief Executive Officer
Featured           First-of-its-kind integrated dataset enables genes-to-ecosystems research         

Featured           Sustainable biomass production capacity could triple US bioeconomy, report finds         

Featured           Researchers, leaders reflect on AGU23, future plans for “wide open science”         

# About | Environmental Sciences Division

### Contact

EricM Pierce

pierceem@ornl.gov

##  

## Advancing understanding of Earth and environmental systems from the molecular to the global scale

 

The Environmental Sciences Division (ESD) is an interdisciplinary research and development organization with more than 60 years of achievements in local, national, and international environmental research. Our vision is to expand scientific knowledge and develop innovative strategies and technologies that will strengthen the nation's leadership in creating solutions to help sustain the Earth’s natural resources.

Scientists in ESD conduct research, develop technology, and perform analyses to understand and assess responses of environmental systems at the environment-human interface and the consequences of alternative energy and environmental strategies. Focus areas include aquatic ecology, ecosystem science, environmental data science, terrestrial systems, bioenergy and water power technologies.

Researchers are studying the processes that govern the fate and transformation of trace elements, nutrients, and contaminants such as mercury in the environment. It was a cross-cutting team of scientists at ORNL who solved a 40-year mystery by discovering the two genes involved in mercury methylation. Research also focuses on developing new methods and analyses useful in the management of human health, environmental, and societal risks associated with emerging technologies and legacy wastes.

From the arctic to the tropics, scientists in the field measure key factors in the soil, water, air, and vegetation, gathering data that informs earth system models and improves predictions of environmental change. Data experts in ESD archive and publish atmospheric and biogeochemical data with more than 12,500 data products available to date. Researchers are also assessing resources, establishing sustainability metrics, and developing new technologies for bioenergy and hydropower.

## Related Videos

#### 

#### 

#### 

Image Gallery
Fact Sheet

## Current Research

## News

Four ORNL researchers elected AAAS fellows

## Publication

  Ecosystem warming extends vegetation activity but heightens vulnerability to cold temperatures

## News

ORNL develops new capability to evaluate human-driven change in Eastern U.S. streams

## News

Plants—Surviving the heat

## Current Research

## News

First-of-its-kind integrated dataset enables genes-to-ecosystems research

## News

Sustainable biomass production capacity could triple US bioeconomy, report finds

## News

Researchers, leaders reflect on AGU23, future plans for “wide open science”

## News

UT-ORII selects two new UT-ORNL convergent research initiatives
Exhibit 32.02


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Enterprises Group, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Alan P. Fraade, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Alan P. Fraade


Name: Alan P. Fraade


Title:   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer











Dated:  August 18, 2010
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3631 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3631

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal the sunset of 
      the special immigrant nonminister religious worker program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 28, 2015

  Mr. Honda (for himself, Mr. Jolly, Ms. Judy Chu of California, Mr. 
Swalwell of California, Ms. Gabbard, Mr. Lowenthal, Ms. Meng, Mr. Ryan 
 of Ohio, Mr. Peters, and Ms. Lofgren) introduced the following bill; 
          which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to repeal the sunset of 
      the special immigrant nonminister religious worker program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Freedom of Faith Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. SPECIAL IMMIGRANT NONMINISTER RELIGIOUS WORKER PROGRAM.

    Section 101(a)(27)(C)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(C)(ii)) is amended in subclauses (II) and (III) by 
striking ``before September 30, 2015,'' both places such term appears.
                                 <all>
```