Appendix A: Summary of Data Corrections and Additions from Public Comments

Commenter/DCN Contact Information Facility ID Unit ID Fuel Category Combustor Design

Did Facility/Parent 

Company Submit 

Comments?

Summary of Changes

FLOsceolaFarms Boiler No. 4 Biomass Fuel Cell No

E-mail from facility stated this unit does not meet the definition of a fuel cell 

per the rule and should instead be classified as a suspension/grate design

FLOsceolaFarms Boiler No. 5 Biomass Fuel Cell No

E-mail from facility stated this unit does not meet the definition of a fuel cell 

per the rule and should instead be classified as a suspension/grate design

ARWeyerhaeuserDierksMill SN-45 Biomass Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner

Yes - Parent Company

Commenter indicated this unit should be classified as a Fuel Cell rather than a 

Dutch Oven/Pile Burner.

MSWeyerhaeuserBruce AA-002 No. 2 Boiler Biomass Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner

Yes - Parent Company

Commenter indicated this unit should be classified as a Fuel Cell rather than a 

Dutch Oven/Pile Burner.

MNWeyerhaeuserIronton All Units - - Yes - Parent Company Commenter states this facility is closed and is not expected to re-open.

KYWeyerhaeuserEKY All Units - - Yes - Parent Company Commenter states this facility is closed and is not expected to re-open.

ALRock-TennDemopolis Power Boiler #3 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this unit should be in the wet biomass stoker subcategory 

instead of being classified as a coal unit.

FLSmurfit-Stone Power Boiler #3 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states that no such unit exists and should be removed from the 

major source inventory.

FLSmurfit-Stone Power Boiler #4 Coal PC Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states that no such unit exists and should be removed from the 

major source inventory.

FLSmurfit-Stone 5PB Dry Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this unit should be in the wet biomass stoker subcategory 

instead of being classified as a dry biomass stoker.

FLSmurfitStonePanamaCity No. 4 Combination 

Boiler Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this unit should be in the wet biomass stoker subcategory 

instead of being classified as a coal unit.

LASmurfit-Stone Power Boiler #2 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states that the control for this unit should be a wet ESP instead of 

a cyclone/multiclone.

MISmurfitStoneOntonagon All Units - - Yes - Parent Company Commenter states this facility is permanently closed.

MTSmurfitStone All Units - - Yes - Parent Company Commenter states this facility is permanently closed.

VASmurfitStoneHopewell Combination Boiler Coal PC Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this unit should be classified as a wet biomass unit instead 

of a coal unit; also, the unit should be classified as a stoker/sloped 

grate/other instead of PC.

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3522-A1

Dean C. DeLorey

The Amalgamated Sugar Co., LLC

208-383-6500

IDAmalgamatedSugarCoTwinFal

ls S-B1 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states the 2006 test (PM & metals) was not a permit compliance 

test (i.e., not approved by the state agency including all appropriate QA/QC 

procedures). The commenter requests that this test be removed from 

consideration, and that only performance testing be applicable to setting 

MACT limits.

VAGeorgiaPacificBrooknealGlad

ys

5600 Biomass Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner

Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this unit is currently regulated as an affected source 

subject to the Plywood and Composite Wood Products (PCWP) MACT (40 CFR 

63 Subpart DDDD) and should thus be removed from the inventory.

WVGPMtHopeOSB

5600 - Wellons 

Energy System

Biomass Dutch Oven/Pile 

Burner

Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this unit is currently regulated as an affected source 

subject to the Plywood and Composite Wood Products (PCWP) MACT (40 CFR 

63 Subpart DDDD) and should thus be removed from the inventory.

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU33 - Power Boiler Heavy Liquid N/A Yes - Parent Company

E-mail from facility stated this unit is no longer permitted to burn fuel oil; the 

only fuel burned in this unit is NG

SCGPChemRussellville FO Boiler Heavy Liquid N/A Yes - Parent Company

E-mail from facility stated this facility has been shut down and that the Title V 

permit has been cancelled

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU33 - Power Boiler Heavy Liquid N/A Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states that fuel has been removed as a permitted fuel in the Title 

V permit for this facility.

SCGPChemRussellville FO Boiler Heavy Liquid N/A Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this facility is no longer in operation and the unit is being 

dismantled.

NCDomtar

66-25-2050 (No. 1 

Package Boiler) Light Liquid N/A No

Commenter states this unit is no longer in operation and has been removed 

from the NC facility.

GATempleInlandThomson BW-B001 Biomass Suspension Burner Yes - Parent Company

Submitted test report for December, 2004 testing which was flagged as nonusable since it was not a M10 test but rather an average CEMS reading. The 

test report provides actual M10 stack testing values to replace the values 

currently in the database.

ARWestFraserHuttig SN-24 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other No

Stack test data and full report provided. Test was conducted on November 2, 

2011.

Dave Buff

Golder Associates Inc.

DBuff@GOLDER.com

N/A - e-mail to 

combustionsurvey@erg.com

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3688-A2

Nina E. Butler

Rock-Tenn Company

770-326-8130 (Enviro. Dept.)

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3523-A1

Stephen E. Woock

Weyerhaeuser Company

919-538-2401

steve.woock@weyerhaeuser.com

Tim Hunt

AF&PA

202-463-2588

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3521-A1

Michael Curtis

Georgia Pacific

MICHAEL.CURTIS@GAPAC.com

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3465-A1

Page 1 of 3
Appendix A: Summary of Data Corrections and Additions from Public Comments

Commenter/DCN Contact Information Facility ID Unit ID Fuel Category Combustor Design

Did Facility/Parent 

Company Submit 

Comments?

Summary of Changes

B-2 Coal PC

B-3 Coal PC

B-4 Coal PC

TNBowaterNewsprint Bubbling Fluidized 

Bed Boiler Biomass FB No Hourly CO CEMS data from 11/10/2011 to 12/27/2011 provided.

MSGPNewAugusta AA-015 Power Boiler Dry Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company Hourly CO CEMS data from 11/19/2011 to 2/1/2012 provided.

VASmurfitStoneWestpt PB08 Coal PC Yes - Parent Company Hourly CO CEMS data from 1/1/2009 to 12/31/2011 provided.

FLUSSugarCorp Boiler No. 8 Biomass Suspension/Grate Yes - Facility Daily CO CEMS data from 4/1/2010 to 12/30/2011 provided. Data have been 

formatted to append to database, but I have not yet actually added the data.

FLUSSugarCorp Boiler No. 8 Biomass Suspension/Grate Yes - Facility

Three separate sets of 9-run CO RATA data submitted in a tabular summary 

(no report provided). Test dates are 12/4/2009, 12/2/2010, and 12/1/2011. 

Before adding to database, would most likely want to get test report and 

review it.

FLOsceolaFarms - - - No

4 fuel analysis samples provided from 12/7-8/2011. Samples were analyzed 

for TSM10 (As, Be, Cd, Cr, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se, Co, & Sb) as well as HHV. Sample 

values given in units of ppm and lb/MMBtu. Data have been formatted for 

database, but not yet added.

FLSugarCaneGrowersCoop - - - No

9 fuel analysis samples provided from 1/19-27/2011. Samples were analyzed 

for TSM10 (As, Be, Cd, Cr, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se, Co, & Sb) as well as HHV. Sample 

values given in units of ppm and lb/MMBtu. Data have been formatted for 

database, but not yet added.

FLUSSugarCorp - - - Yes - Facility

6 fuel analysis samples provided from 1/25/2011. Samples were analyzed for 

TSM10 (As, Be, Cd, Cr, Pb, Mn, Ni, Se, Co, & Sb) as well as HHV. Sample values 

given in units of ppm and lb/MMBtu. Data have been formatted for database, 

but not yet added.

HIChevronKapolei Boiler 5 & Boiler 6 Non-Continental 

Liquid N/A No

Two runs of PM testing for each boiler provided in a tabular summary. 

Appears that methods 201A and 202 were used to measure PM10, PM2.5, 

and condensible PM. Total PM is also given. Total filterable PM is not given, 

but could perhaps be calculated by subracting the condensible PM from the 

total PM. Will request test report in order to verify test data before adding to 

database. Unit ID's do not match what is in our database, so we will need to 

get clarification on which ID's pertain to Boilers 5 & 6.

HIChevronKapolei - - - Yes - Parent Company

1 fuel analysis sample provided from 1/31/2012. Samples were analyzed for 

TSM10 plus Phosphorus. Sample values given in ppb, no HHV available to 

standardize so the HHV from Subpart C of GHG Reporting Rule (40 CFR 63) 

used in standardization. Unclear if these data are on dry or as received basis. 

Data formatted for database, but not yet added.

PAKimberlyClarkChester Boiler #10 (ID 035) Coal FB Yes - Facility Daily CO CEMS averages from 1/1/2007 to 7/31/2011 provided.

PAKimberlyClarkChester Boiler #10 (ID 035) Coal FB Yes - Facility Submitted corrected CO ET values for a test conducted on 9/17/2003.

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3676-A2

Bill Perdue

American Home Furnishings Alliance 

(AHFA)

bperdue@afha.us

336-884-5000, ext 1017

WIAlgoma All Units - - No

Commenter states this facility is a synthetic minor source of HAP and all units 

should be removed from the major source inventory.

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3658-A2

Mark Weiss

Reciprocal Energy Company

[no phone or e-mail given]

? ? ? ? No

Provided graphical CO CEMS data paired with steam rates for the Steam 

Center at Jackson Lab in Bar Harbor, Maine. The data appear to be hourly CO 

data from Feb 4-5 and Feb 14-19, 2012. This facility was comissioned in 2011, 

and is not in our database. Thus, we do not know if this is a major or area 

source. If this is a major source, should we request the source data for the 

graphs?

Stack test data and full report provided. Test was conducted between late 

September and early October, 2011. Also provided D/F test data for each 

boilers; should we spend time adding these data to the database or should we 

ignore the data?

OKGPMuskogeeMill Yes - Parent Company

Dell Majure

Kimberly Clark EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3692-A2

Matthew Todd (API)

toddm@api.org

202-682-8319

David Friedman (AFPM)

dfriedman@afpm.org

202-552-8461

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3677

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3505-A1

Ashok K. Jain

NCASI

352-331-1745

Dave Buff

Golder Associates Inc.

DBuff@GOLDER.com

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3504-A1

Page 2 of 3
Appendix A: Summary of Data Corrections and Additions from Public Comments

Commenter/DCN Contact Information Facility ID Unit ID Fuel Category Combustor Design

Did Facility/Parent 

Company Submit 

Comments?

Summary of Changes

ORGeorgiaPacificWaunaMill EU33 - Power Boiler Heavy Liquid N/A Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states that fuel has been removed as a permitted fuel in the Title 

V permit for this facility.

SCGPChemRussellville FO Boiler Heavy Liquid N/A Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states this facility is no longer in operation and the unit is being 

dismantled.

NCDomtar

66-25-2050 (No. 1 

Package Boiler) Light Liquid N/A No

Commenter states this unit is no longer in operation and has been removed 

from the NC facility.

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3673-A2

Christopher S. Colman

Hess Corporation

732-750-6535

USVIHOVENSA All Units - - Yes - Facility Commenter states that this facility is shut down.

MIMISugarSebewaing Boiler #3 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

Facility submitted PM test data for a common stack between boilers 2 and 3. 

However, when imported into the database and corrected for the common 

stack issue using internal data handling methods, we show the data as 

pertaining to boilers 1 and 2 instead of boilers 2 and 3. The data for boiler 1 

should have the unit ID changed to show the data actually pertain to boiler 3.

NDMinnDakFarmers Babcock and Wilcox 

Boiler #6 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter suggested some of the reported test data should pertain to this 

boiler instead of boiler 5. However, the reported unit ID in each tab of the ET 

spreadsheet is that of boiler 5. The commenter did not specify which set(s) of 

data should actually pertain to boiler 6.

MNAmericanCrystalCrookston Boiler 2 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

ET spreadsheet contains a tab named "Boiler No2 - PM and Metals"; however, 

the unit ID entered for this data is boiler 1. Consequently, the database shows 

the data as pertaining to boiler 1. The commenter suggested this data should 

be associated with boiler 2.

MNAmericanCrystalCrookston Boiler 3 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

ET spreadsheet contains a tab named "Boiler No3 - PM and Metals"; however, 

the unit ID entered for this data is boiler 1. Consequently, the database shows 

the data as pertaining to boiler 1. The commenter suggested this data should 

be associated with boiler 3.

MNAmericanCrystalMoorhead Boiler 3 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Parent Company

Commenter states that the database is missing data from this unit and that 

the missing data are reported in the ET spreadsheet for the facility. A review 

of the database and ET spreadsheet does not show any missing data, so it is 

unclear why the commenter is concerned over the data for this facility.

MNAmericanCrystalEastGrandF

orks Facility-wide Facility-wide Facility-wide Yes - Parent Company

Commenter notes that the database does not contain reported test data for 

this facility. This is due to the fact that the facility is not in the major source 

boiler inventory because the facility did not answer the Answer Key question 

regarding major vs. area source HAP status in its initial ICR survey response. As 

a result, this facility is unclassified as either major or area, and the test data 

for its boilers were not used in the analysis. 

HITesoro SG1102

Non-Continental 

Liquid N/A Yes - Facility Submitted new test data from a January, 2012 test for CO and PM.

HITesoro H101B

Non-Continental 

Liquid N/A Yes - Facility Submitted new test data from a January, 2012 test for CO and PM.

N/A - e-mail to 

combustionsurvey@erg.com

Anna Beth Reitter

Annabeth.Reitter@newpagecorp.com

WINewPageBiron B24 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/

Other Yes - Facility Submitted new CO CEMS hourly data for year 2011.

N/A - phone conversation with ERG 

on 8/8/12 Lisa Fleming

NJVinelandMuniElectricHowardDown Unit 9, Unit 10 Coal, Liquid Yes - FacilityUnit 9 shutdown February 2010. Unit 10 ceased firing coal in 2009 and is in the 

process of shutdown, no later than September 1st, 2012.

N/A - ERG research after facility 

phone contact was disconnected. N/A NYConEdHudsonAve

Boilers 71, 72, 81 and 

82

Liquid N/A Yes - Facility NYSDEC Permit ID 2-6101-00042/00044 indicates these four boilers 

permanently shutdown and ceased operation on February 7, 2011.

Douglas B. Price

Tesoro

210-626-6287

Douglas.B.Prices@tsocorp.com

Submittal to docket - DCN not 

known

Douglas Emerson

American Crystal Sugar Co.

216-236-4400

Steven Smock

Michigan Sugar Co.

989-686-0161

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3675-A2

EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0058-3503-A1

Sarah E. Amick

Rubber Manufacturers Association 

(RMA)

202-682-4836

Page 3 of 3
Appendix B: Units Reclassified as Major Source Boilers from CISWI and MATS

FacilityID UnitID Classification

Design 

Capacity 

(MMBtu/hr)

Annual 

Hours of 

Operation

Fuel Category Combustor Design Reason for Reclassification

CAWheelabratorShasta Boiler#1 Boiler 339 8202 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Ceased waste combustion in 2009; reclassified from CISWI

CAWheelabratorShasta Boiler#2 Boiler 339 8186 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Ceased waste combustion in 2009; reclassified from CISWI

CAWheelabratorShasta Boiler#3 Boiler 339 8035 Wet Biomass Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Ceased waste combustion in 2009; reclassified from CISWI

VACogentrixHopewell 1A Boiler 200 7061 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixHopewell 1B Boiler 200 7037 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixHopewell 1C Boiler 200 7153 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixHopewell 2A Boiler 200 7400 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixHopewell 2B Boiler 200 7226 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixHopewell 2C Boiler 200 7145 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixPortsmouth 1A Boiler 200 5981 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixPortsmouth 1B Boiler 200 5909 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixPortsmouth 1C Boiler 200 5896 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixPortsmouth 2A Boiler 200 5669 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixPortsmouth 2B Boiler 200 5566 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

VACogentrixPortsmouth 2C Boiler 200 5740 Coal Stoker/SlopedGrate/Other Does not meet size threshold for classification under MATS

Page 1 of 1