alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pop Starz Records, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Adam Wasserman
                                        ------------------
                                        Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2008

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
ex_96709.htm


Exhibit 10.1


 


 


THIRD AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT


 


THIS AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is entered into as of September 29, 2017, by and between NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware corporation ("Borrower"), and WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("Bank").


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Borrower is currently indebted to Bank pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Credit Agreement between Borrower and Bank dated as of November 1, 2014, as amended from time to time ("Credit Agreement").


 


WHEREAS, Bank and Borrower have agreed to certain changes in the terms and conditions set forth in the Credit Agreement and have agreed to amend the Credit Agreement to reflect said changes.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, for valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree that the Credit Agreement shall be amended as follows:


   


1.     Section 5.7. is hereby deleted in its entirety, and the following substituted therefor:


 


 


"SECTION 5.7.     LOANS, ADVANCES, INVESTMENTS. Make any loans or advances to or investments in any person or entity, except (a) any of the foregoing existing as of, and disclosed to Bank prior to, the date hereof; and (b) additional loans, advances or investments in amounts not to exceed an aggregate of $1,500,000.00 at any time outstanding."


 


2.     Except as specifically provided herein, all terms and conditions of the Credit Agreement remain in full force and effect, without waiver or modification. All terms defined in the Credit Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment. This Amendment and the Credit Agreement shall be read together, as one document.


 


3.     Borrower hereby remakes all representations and warranties contained in the Credit Agreement and reaffirms all covenants set forth therein. Borrower further certifies that as of the date of this Amendment there exists no Event of Default as defined in the Credit Agreement, nor any condition, act or event which with the giving of notice or the passage of time or both would constitute any such Event of Default.


 


 



-1-




 




     


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed as of the day and year first written above.


 


 


 


	NATURAL ALTERNATIVES INTERNATIONAL, INC.	 	WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Kenneth Wolf	 	By:	/s/ Glenn Burton	 
	 	KENNETH E. WOLF,	 	 	GLENN BURTON,	 
	 	PRESIDENT	 	 	VICE PRESIDENT	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	By:	/s/ Michael Fortin	 	 	 	 
	 	MICHAEL FORTIN,	 	 	 	 
	 	CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER	 	 	 	 



 


 


 


-2-
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I,James W. Sullivan, Chief Financial Officer of Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”),certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that to my knowledge:(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 14, 2007       By: /s/ James W. Sullivan       Name: James W. Sullivan  Title: Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1370

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GILBERT KITILA,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief District 

Judge. (8:09-cv-00455-DKC)

Submitted: November 30, 2010 Decided: December 3, 2010

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gilbert Kitila, Appellant Pro Se. Carol Barthel, UNITED STATES 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Gilbert Kitila appeals the district court’s order 

granting the government’s motion to reduce to judgment tax 

assessments made against Kitila for unpaid federal income taxes 

and penalties for the 1988, 1989, and 1990 tax years. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United 

States v. Kitila, No. 8:09-cv-00455-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 8, 2010). 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
  Certification
    Pursuant to
    Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
    Form 10-Q
      Rules 13a-15(e) 15d-15(e)
              By:
    /s/  Jeffrey
    J. McParland   Title:
    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Targa
    Resources GP, LLC,     67
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SaveDaily, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff Mahony, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ JEFF MAHONY         | 
|----------------------- | 
|                        | 
|Jeff Mahony             | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|                        | 
|November 14, 2012       | 



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying
the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
2017 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item
1123)





Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”)
dated as of September 1, 2012 by and among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services,
a Division of PNC Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge
Lender Services LLC as Operating Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying
Agent and Custodian relating to the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2012-C3 (UBS-Barclays 2012-C3)





The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,
as special servicer (the “Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:



| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement are performed
on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of January 1, 2017 to December
31, 2017 (the “Reporting Period”) in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under my
supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the terms
of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there has been a failure to fulfill
any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March
    1, 2018
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | ------------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |
~~~~ i~~~~e~~~~a~~~~~ ~i~~"dPo~r~~ion k: 300' AGL lass G, SFC-?OO'AGL Class E, 700' AGL- 1500' MSL Class C, 1500'-3000' MSL 

~~~ ass 

B, 3000' 

MSL-FLT 

LVL 

~~~With n 

S

FO Mode C 30

NM
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3601 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3601

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7715 Post Road, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, as the ``Melvoid J. 
                     Benson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2015

 Mr. Langevin (for himself and Mr. Cicilline) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7715 Post Road, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, as the ``Melvoid J. 
                     Benson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MELVOID J. BENSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7715 Post Road, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Melvoid J. Benson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Melvoid J. 
Benson Post Office Building''.
                                 <all>
```
# OalGINAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 22-0065 L. CRAIG SEMENZA, 

### A?R 0 4 2023

Petitioner and Appellant, v. HOLLISTERA. LARSON, et al., and HOLLY JEAN LARSON, both individually and collectively d/b/a FIRST & MAIN BUILDING,

Respondents and Appellees. BovvE-. n G ,er wood ci, - emo COUll State r.“ lvlontana ORDER

On February 21, 2023, we issued an opinion in the above-entitled action, affirming the District Court's dismissal of Semenza's case for failure to prosecute. Semenza v. Larson, 2023 MT 32N. Semenza has petitioned for rehearing. M. R.App.P. 20(1)(a) provides that a petition forrehearingwill be considered only whenthe Court "overlooked some fact materialtothe decision,"when "it overlooked some question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the case," or when "its decision conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court. Having fully considered Semenza's petition, we conclude that rehearing is not warranted under the standards ofM. R. App. P. 20(1)(a). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED. The Clerk ofCourt is directed to mail copies ofthis Order to L. Craig Semenza and all counsel ofrecord. DATED this LI day ofApril, 2023. 04/04/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0065~
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 96-048]

                    On September 17, 2024, the California State Water Resources Control Board (California SWRCB) submitted to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) notice that it received a request for a Clean Water Act section 401(a)(1) water quality certification as defined in 40 CFR 121.5, from Pacific Gas and Electric Company, in conjunction with the above captioned project, on August 22, 2024. Pursuant to section 4.34(b)(5) of the Commission's regulations,[1]                                          we hereby notify California SWRCB of the following:                

                    Date of Receipt of the Certification Request: August 22, 2024.                          ( print page 79907)    

Reasonable Period of Time to Act on the Certification Request: One year, August 22, 2025.

If California SWRCB fails or refuses to act on the water quality certification request on or before the above date, then the certifying authority is deemed waived pursuant to section 401(a)(1) of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341(a)(1).

Dated: September 24, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             18 CFR 4.34(b)(5).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-22423 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
#### ROBINSON et al. v. STATE.

No. 3695.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

May 19, 1938.

Rehearing Denied June 9, 1938.

McKenzie & Gamble, Sam B. Gillett, and Peticolas & Peticolas, all of El Paso, for appellants.

Roy D. Jackson, Dist. Atty., and Theodore Andress, both of El Paso, for appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

This is a- proceeding by the State of Texas against the Unknown Heirs of William Bradford, deceased, to escheat the estate of said deceased. Tennie V. Robinson and others intervened. This is the third appeal in the case. The opinions upon the former appeals are reported in Tex.Civ.App., 87 S.W.2d 297 and Tex.Civ.App., 109 S.W.2d 559, to which we refer. Upon the last trial, which was without the aid of a jury, the Court found that William Bradford, deceased, died “ ‘having no heirs’ * * * no heirs who can be ascertained by the exercise of reasonable diligence.” (109 S.W.2d page 561) Upon this and other findings made, judgment was rendered escheating the estate, from which Tennie V. Robinson and others appeal.

It is first asserted the finding stated is not a finding that William Bradford died having no heirs. Wherefore, the judgment in the State’s favor was unauthorized. This proposition is ruled against appellants by the opinion reported in Tex.Civ.App., 109 S.W.2d 559. It was there held the phrase “having no heirs,” means no known heirs, and no heirs who can be ascertained by the exercise of reasonable diligence. That is, such diligence as a reasonably diligent person would exercise in the transaction of his own business under the same or similar circumstances. We adhere to that ruling, and overrule appellants’ first proposition.

The next proposition submitted is that the finding the interveners were not related to the deceased is against the great weight of the evidence, in that all of the evidence shows that William Bradford and Richard Bradford were brothers. We do not view the evidence in that light. The finding in question is sufficiently supported *810by the evidence, and this Court would not be warranted in setting the same aside.

This disposes of all questions presented by the appellants.

Finding no error, the judgment is affirmed.

In this case Chief Justice NEALON was disqualified and did not participate.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81987]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23309]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special 
Projects Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is 
soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving 
customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be 
held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Wednesday, November 13, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Antoinette Ross at 1-888-912-1227 or 
202-317-4110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Special Projects 
Committee will be held Wednesday, November 13, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. 
Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit 
written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure 
of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with 
Antoinette Ross. For more information please contact Antoinette Ross at 
1-888-912-1227 or 202-317-4110, or write TAP Office, 1111 Constitution 
Ave. NW, Room 1509, Washington, DC 20224 or contact us at the website: 
http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include TAP 2024 committee 
project focus areas.

    Dated: October 1, 2024.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2024-23309 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emilia Ochoa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Castillo, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Castillo, Inc.


Date: August 12, 2009                 By: /s/ Emilia Ochoa
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Emilia Ochoa
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer
#### CRAIG v. STATE.

No. 18138.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 22, 1936.

Rehearing Denied May 27, 1936.

H. C. Ford, of Dallas, and W. E. Myres, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

' KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of theft of property over the value of $5 and under the value of $50, and her punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a term of ninety days.

*466Appellant, who is the wife of Dr. Craig and lives in Ft. Worth, was in Dallas on or about the 27th day of April, 1935, at which time she went into the store of A. Harris & Co., located in the city of Dallas, took four night gowns, and walked out. Mrs. Phillips, a special investigator for Stores Mutual Protective Association, who saw her take the articles and walk out of the store with them, followed her out to the side walk, took the garments away from her, and took her back into the store.

At the trial the issue of insanity was raised by testimony offered by appellant, which the court submitted to the jury, and which the jury determined adversely to her.

There are ten bills of exception in the record, all of which are in question and answer form without any certificate from the trial judge that it was necessary that they be in such form. Hence under article 760, C.C.P., as amended (Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 760) Ainsworth v. State, 105 Tex.Cr.R. 212, 287 S.W. 250, Wright v. State, 107 Tex.Cr.R. 514, 298 S.W. 296, and Simmons v. State, 116 Tex.Cr.R. 68, 28 S.W.(2d) 1084, we cannot consider the same.

Finding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.