alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3579 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3579

 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2015

Mr. Sarbanes (for himself, Mr. Wittman, Mr. Connolly, Ms. DelBene, Ms. 
Frankel of Florida, Mr. Heck of Nevada, Mr. Goodlatte, Ms. Kuster, Mr. 
 Murphy of Florida, Mr. Ruppersberger, and Mr. Thompson of California) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                    Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, to provide that 
  any hours worked by Federal firefighters under a qualified trade-of-
   time arrangement shall be excluded for purposes of determinations 
                       relating to overtime pay.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Firefighter Flexibility and 
Fairness Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF HOURS WORKED UNDER A QUALIFIED TRADE-OF-TIME 
              ARRANGEMENT.

    Section 5542 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(g)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any 
hours worked by a firefighter under a qualified trade-of-time 
arrangement shall be disregarded for purposes of any determination 
relating to eligibility for, or the amount of, any overtime pay under 
this section.
    ``(2) For purposes of this section--
            ``(A) the term `qualified trade-of-time arrangement' means 
        an arrangement under which 2 firefighters who are employed by 
        the same agency agree, solely at their option and with the 
        approval of their employing agency, to substitute for one 
        another during scheduled work hours in the performance of work 
        in the same capacity; and
            ``(B) the term `firefighter' means a firefighter as defined 
        by section 8331(21) or 8401(14).''.
                                 <all>
```
1 

### Medina, Dayana

From: Cutbirth, James W. <James.Cutbirth@GAPAC.com>

Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 11:58 AM

To: 'PETTYJOHN@adeq.state.ar.us'

Cc: 'Davis, Anthony (DavisA@adeq.state. ar.us)'; 'mac@adeq.state.ar.us'; 'spencer@adeq.state.ar.us'; Medina,

Dayana; Donaldson, Guy; Nann, Barbar a; Feldman, Michael; Kordzi, Joe

Subject: Georgia-Pacific Responses to ADEQ and EPA Region 6 BART Questions for Crossett Paper Operations,

Crossett AR

Attachments: BART Response to ADEQ and EPA Region 6 04-01-2013.pd f; FW: Region 6 feedback on Georgia Pacific6A and 9A boilers; FW: Georgia Pacific; Tabl e 1-Baseline 2001 2002 2003 BART Analyses 3-27-2013.xls;

BART Five Factor Analysis Response 05-18-2012.pdf

Mary and all other personnel at ADEQ and EPA Region 6:

Please find enclosed Georgia

‐ Pacific’s written responses to the questions and issues related to BART compliance for the

Crossett Paper Operations facility in Crossett AR that were discussed during our teleconference call on March 20,

2013. Enclosed with this submittal are the following attachments:

 Letter from Georgia

‐ Pacific to Mary Pettyjohn at ADEQ, dated April 1, 2013, transmitting written

responses related to BART compliance for the Crossett Paper Operations

 E

‐ mail correspondence between Dayana Medina and Mary Pettyjohn, dated February 06, 2013 for Boiler

9A

 E

‐ mail correspondence between Dayana Medina and Mary Pettyjohn, dated March 4, 2013 for Boiler 6A

 Table 1

‐ Baseline Years (2001

‐ 2002

‐ 2003) BART Emission Calculations and Explanation fo How 24

‐ hour

Maximum Emission Rates Were Determined for BART Analyses

 Correspondence Letter between Georgia

‐ Pacific and ADEQ, dated May 18, 2012, with results of CALPUFF

Modeling for 6A Boiler and 9A Boiler

Sincerely,



## Jim Cutbirth

Jim Cutbirth

Environmental Manager

Georgia Pacific LLC

Crossett Consumer Products Mill

(870)567

‐ 8144
Exhibit 31.1 I, Robert T. Ladd, Chief Executive Officer of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation certify that: 1.

          I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation; 2.

          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.

          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4.

          The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a)

          designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b)

          evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c)

          disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.

          The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a)

          all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b)

          any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. Dated this 11th day of March 2013. By:

          /s/ Robert T. LaddRobert T. Ladd Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1.3

CERTIFICATION

I, Sidney
E. Anderson, principal financial officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Sidney E. Anderson                                        
|Sidney E. Anderson, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                                 

August 3, 2010
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 10-303 Date: March 2010 

Subject: FEHBP Cost Factor for Third Quarter of FY 2010 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program (FEHBP) for the third quarter of FY 2010. The annual imputed cost factors for all civilian 

benefit programs will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2010. 

The FEHBP cost factor for the third quarter of FY 2010 is $1,414. 

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. Additionally, you may contact us on 202-606-0606. 

 

Keith Willingham 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Center for Financial Services
#### PHARISS v. STATE.

No. 20274.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 5, 1939.

Aubrey Davee, of Brady, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.'

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $100.

 There is no proof in the record in support of the averments in the complaint and information that McCulloch County is a dry area. The conviction cannot stand with the record in such condition. Cunningham v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 63, 102 S.W.2d 413. We are not authorized to consider the affidavits filed in this court to the effect that McCulloch Coqnty is a dry area.

With permission of the court the county attorney amended the complaint by interlining certain phrases. Such action invalidated the complaint. We quote from Patillo v. State, 3 Tex.App. 442, as follows: “Clearly the court had no right to amend, or permit any one else to amend, the affidavit. Affiant himself could not have done so without being sworn anew as to the amended statement. Whenever the court permitted the county attorney to amend the affidavit, it ceased to be the act of affiant; * *

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court. 3⁄8
Exhibit 10.4(d)

 

	

    	
Sydling Futures Management LLC
    1285 Avenue of the Americas, 20th Floor
   New York, NY 10019
    


 

July 6, 2017

 

Ms. Brigid Rentoul

Winton Capital Management Limited

 

Re:         Cavendish Futures Fund LLC

Sydling WNT Master Fund LLC

 

Dear Ms. Rentoul:

 

The Trading Advisory Agreement (the “Agreement”) among the above named funds, Sydling Futures Management LLC and Winton Capital Management Limited expired June 30, 2017.  Please accept this letter as a renewal of the Agreement and all terms for an additional twelve months to expire on June 30, 2018.

 

Please acknowledge this renewal by signing below and returning to my attention at jennifer.magro@ubs.com.

 

	
Best regards,
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Jennifer Magro
    	
 
    
	
Jennifer Magro
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
ACKNOWLEDGED BY:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
/s/ Brigid Rentoul
    	
 
    
	
Signature
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
Brigid Rentoul
    	
 
    
	
Print Name
#                                                     Desarae J  Goldsby                                            

###                         Associate Technician                    

## Contact

goldsbydj@ornl.gov|865.241.2152

## Publications

##   Additively Manufacturing Nitinol Shape Memory Alloys for Advanced Actuator Designs

January, 2024

##   Methods for rapid identification of anomalous layers in laser powder bed fusion...

July, 2023

##   3D-printed B 4 C collimation for neutron pressure cells...

September, 2021

##   Binder Jet  Printing of H13 Tool Steel...

July, 2021

View All

## Key Links

ORCID

## Organizations

Energy Science and Technology Directorate

User Facilities

Manufacturing Demonstration Facility

Oak Ridge National Laboratory				1 Bethel Valley Road				Oak Ridge, TN 37830

(+1) 865.576.7658

#### Connect With Us

                                  -  Partnerships 
                                  -  Visit 
                                  -  Contact 

#### News

                                  -  Newsroom 
                                  -  Newsletter Signup 
                                  -  Media Contacts 

#### Research

                                  -  Science Areas 
                                  -  User Facilities 
                                  -  Centers & Institutes 

#### Resources

                                  -  Internal Users 
                                  -  Directory 

                                  -  Privacy 
                                  -  Accessibility/508 
                                  -  Nondiscrimination/1557 
                                  -  Vulnerability Disclosure Program
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 16121.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 20, 1933.

See, also. (Tex. Cr. App.) 65 S.W.(2d) 773.

Jno. M. Hatter, of Waxahachie, for appel- * lant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted oí the offense of unlawfully selling a bottle of liquor capable of producing intoxication, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The appellant filed a motion to quash the indictment because the indictment merely charged that the appellant “did then and there unlawfully sell to Joe Lee Wardlaw one bottle of liquor capable'of producing intoxication,” and did not expressly follow Article 666 of the Penal Code which makes it an offensq to sell spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors of medicated bitters capable of producing intoxication, and that the state ha» wholly failed *773to charge the kind of liquor defendant is alleged to have sold whether it was spirituous, vinous, or malt liquors or medicated bitters, which motion of the appellant was by the court overruled and the appellant excepted.

Article 666 of the Penal Code of this state makes it an offense for any person to manufacture, sell, barter, exchange, transport, export, deliver, take orders for, or furnish spirituous, vmous, or malt liquors or medicated bitters capable of producing intoxication, or any other intoxicant whatever. It appears to us that from a reading of the statute that the indictment charges the offense of selling liquor capable of producing intoxication, and in support hereof we refer to the cases of Tucker v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 505, 251 S. W. 1090; Nowells v. State, 94 Tex. Cr. R. 571, 252 S. W. 550.

No other question being raised and no error appearing in the record before us, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CTJRIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
confidential







ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE





Reference is hereby made to
that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,
as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian,
Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series
2012-CCRE2 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in
the Agreement.

Pursuant
to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Services andTimothy S. Ryan,
Managing Director of Customer Relationship Management do hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2018 through
December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.



|                  |  |                  
|----------------- |  | -----------------
|Leslie Hayton     |  | Timothy S. Ryan  
|Managing Director |  | Managing Director
|Wells Fargo Bank  |  | Wells Fargo Bank 





















confidential
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:




(1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement (as defined below), of the Company during the period from August 8, 2012 through March 31, 2013 (the “Reporting Period”); and




(2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.




This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Section 4.09(a) of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, in its individual capacity and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trust.




Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 24th day of June, 2013.




/s/Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)





(Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)





Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:





The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: August 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Zishen WuZishen WuPresident and CEODated: August 9, 2011
By:
/s/ Sam YuSam YuChief Financial Officer
#### The CONTINENTAL SUPPLY CO., Appellant, v. H. C. SHANKLE and T. J. Murray, Appellees.

No. 10396.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 14, 1938.

Keys & Holt and Hayden W. Head, all of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Thos. H. Ward, of Laredo, for appellees.

MURRAY, Justice.

Affirmed without written opinion. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973; Arts. 1873 and 1874, R.C.S.1925.
John A. Porter 

June 1,2010 

U. S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building ground floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Exemption No. 652IF 

i^^niatoi7©ocket No. FAA-2002-ir2t63 

Gentlemen; 

This is to request an extension of exemption No. 652 IF fiom 14 CFR, FAR 91.109 (A) 

(B) (3), which will expire on October 31,2010. 

The exonption for flight instruction in Beedicrafl airplanes equipped with a functioning 

throwover control wheel in place of functioning dual controls remains the same as in my 

letters dated March 29,1996, April 14,1998, April 9,2002, May 26,2004, June 1,2006 

and May 27,2008.. 

1 have since May of 1989, served as an instructor for the American Bonanza Society Air 

Safety Foundation. BPPP has been issued an extraision of the exemption for whidi I am 

a member. 

Sincerely 

John A. Porter 

CFII1380020 

29 Walnut Via, Anaheim, California 92801-1045 

714-526-6576
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTER

U. S. Office of Personnel Management

Number: P-98-4 Date: April 24, 1998 

Subject: Impact of Y2K on RITS 

The Department of the Treasury’s contractor has begun to renovate

the Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) for year 2000

(Y2K) compliance. This letter provides information on the

procedures that will be necessary to interact with the Y2Kcompliant RITS.

ON-LINE OR OFF-LINE

Payroll offices, submitting RITS data either on-line or off-line

via the dBASE data-entry disk, will be the required to enter 

eight-digit date fields (i.e., mm/dd/yyyy). The renovated RITS 

on-line screens and off-line data-entry disk will begin to 

use the eight-digit date field in calendar years 1998 and

1999, respectively. 

HOST-TO-HOST

L Payroll systems that will use a six-digit date field will require no modification for RITS

purposes. 

The renovated RITS will continue to use the current, six-digit date

field (yymmdd) for host-to-host transmission of data. File formats

will not change. The contractor will convert the date-field to

eight-digits using windowing -- more precisely, Conventional

Century Window, 1980-2079. Thus, six-digit date fields falling

between 80mmdd and 99mmdd will be interpreted as 19XX; and those

between 00mmdd and 79mmdd as 20XX. For example, a RITS date-field

transmitted as 98mmdd would be read by the RITS system as 1998mmdd;

a date submitted as 01mmdd will be read as 2001mmdd.

L Payroll systems that will use an eight-digit date field after renovation must convert the

date field to six-digits for RITS purposes. 
The RITS contractor’s requirement of a six-digit date field for

host-to-host was based on their assessment that mandating an 

eight-digit date field would be unnecessarily burdensome on the

overall RITS compliance process. 

RITS OUTPUT

RITS will continue to write all output (2812 reports) with a 

six-digit date field (mm/dd/yy).

If you have any questions on the changes to RITS or the impact of

these changes, please contact us on (202)606-0666 or via email at

Finance@OPM.Gov.

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service