alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```
 
```

```
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month
period ending January 31, 2010 of Barricode, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the
"Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Tom Delaney, Chairman, President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.

 /s/ TOM DELANEY
 __________________________________________________
 Tom Delaney
 President, Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
 Principal Financial Officer and Director

Date: March 19, 2010
```
EXHIBIT 10.1
  
 Re:
    
    Eighth Amendment to Subscriber Services Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2007 (Agreement)
between Travelport, LP (f/k/a Travelport International, L.L.C., hereinafter Travelport),
Travelport Global Distribution System B.V. (f/k/a Galileo Nederland B.V., hereinafter TGDS
and, together with Travelport, collectively, Galileo) and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC
(Subscriber)
    Custom Terms and Conditions Revision
 General
 1




---



##### 



Orbitz Worldwide, LLC
    
    
    
    Travelport, LP
By: Travelport Holdings LLC as
General PartnerSignature:
    
    /s/ Ronnie Gurion
    
    
    
    Signature:
    
    /s/ Scott HydenName:
    
    Ronnie Gurion
    
    
    
    
    
    Name:
    
    Scott HydenTitle:
    
    President, Orbitz Distribution
    
    
    
    
    
    Title:
    
    VP, SalesDate: 8/27/10
    
    
    
    Date: 8/30/10Travelport Global Distribution System B.V.Signature:
    
    /s/ Marco van IeperenName:
    
    Marco van IeperenTitle:
    
    DirectorDate: 8/30/10
 2
You have a right to:

• A safe and healthy workplace.

• Protection against hazards.

• Report unsafe working conditions.

Call 1-800-321-OSHA (6742) or 

visit osha.gov/worker.

Recommended tips to stay safe:

• Social distance when possible.

• Wear a cloth face covering and gloves.

• Wash hands often with soap and water

or use hand sanitizer.

• Avoid sharing tools, if possible.

• Disinfect tools before and after use

by another.

Report unsafe conditions. 

It’s confidential.

If you have concerns 

about your safety and 

health during COVID-19, 

OSHA can help.

osha.gov/worker

OSHA 4069-07 2020

Given the evolving nature of the pandemic, OSHA is in the process of reviewing and updating this document. These materials may no longer 

represent current OSHA recommendations and guidance. For the most up-to-date information, consult Protecting Workers Guidance.
DENY; and Opinion Filed January 24, 2019.

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05-19-00078-CV

IN RE EMEKA ALUDOGBU AND RESTORATIVE HEALTHCARE, LLC, Relators

Original Proceeding from the 101st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-19-00112

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Brown, Schenck, and Reichek

Opinion by Justice Brown

In this original proceeding, relators seek a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to 

dissolve the January 4, 2019 temporary restraining order and vacate the January 18, 2019 orders 

extending the temporary restraining order, continuing the temporary injunction hearing, and 

permitting expedited discovery. Relators also seek a stay of relator Emeka Aludogbu’s deposition, 

which is scheduled for January 25, 2019. 

To obtain mandamus relief, relators must show that the trial court clearly abused its 

discretion and that relators have no adequate remedy by appeal. In re Prudential Ins. Co. of Am., 

148 S.W.3d 124, 135–36 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding). A party has no remedy by appeal when 

a temporary restraining order is granted that is not in compliance with the rules, and a writ of 

mandamus is appropriate in such situations. In re Office of Attorney Gen., 257 S.W.3d 695, 697–

98 (Tex. 2008) (orig. proceeding); In re Tex. Nat. Res. Conservation Comm’n, 85 S.W.3d 201, 207 

(Tex. 2002); In re S. Foods Group, LLC, No. 05-13-01348-CV, 2013 WL 5888255, at *1 (Tex. 
–2–

App.—Dallas Oct. 31, 2013, orig. proceeding). Based on the record before us, we conclude 

relators have not shown they are entitled to the relief requested. Accordingly, we deny relators’ 

petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a) (the court must deny the petition if the 

court determines relator is not entitled to the relief sought).

180078F.P05

/Ada Brown/

ADA BROWN

JUSTICE
#### UNION INDEMNITY CO. v. FOLEY.

No. 12837.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

May 13, 1933.

Rehearing Denied June 17, 1933.

Kilgore & Rogers, of Wichita Falls, for plaintiff in error.

E. W. Napier, of Wichita Falls, for defendant in error.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

A railroad company was levelling a tract of land on which to build a railroad yard. Appellee had a contract to take dirt from an excavator and haul it to the lower portions of the tract and there spread and level it. The hauling was done by trucks. Three men were assigned to each truck, a driver and two helpers. Also graders and shovels were used in spreading the soil after it was dumped by the trucks.

Appellant issued a policy of workmen’s compensation insurance upon the employees of appellee, and sues here for the premiums therefor, claiming that the men above referred to, or at least to the extent that it was agreed by the parties that same were truckmen, should be classified under Code No. 7219, Manual of Rates: “Truckmen (N O C) payroll to include drivers, chauffeurs •and their helpers, stablemen, garagemen, blacksmiths, repairmen and riggers, excluding only clerical office and storage ware'house employees. (Truckmen engaged in hauling under contract, whether for one ox-more individuals or concerns, shall under no circumstances be classified and rated except in accordance with this classification) Rate $6.38 per $100.00.”

While appellee contended that the classification should be Code No. 0041: “Grading Land — not canal or cellar excavation, quarrying, railroad or sti-eet or l-oad constructions, including drivers, chauffeurs and their helpers. Rate $2.01 per $100.00.”

No other issue was made by the pleadings.

We believe the trial court correctly held that No. 6041 applied. Drivers and chauffeurs are directly included in each, bul-an examination of the two sections reveals that No. 7219 deals generally with all truck-men in whatever kind of employment, while No. 6041 deals specifically with drivers and chauffeurs in the work of grading land. These men were grading land. Following the familiar rule of construction that legislation prescribing a specific provision applying to a specific condition will prevail over and control other conflicting clauses containing general terms which are broad enough to include this specific condition along with many other different conditions, City of San Antonio v. Toepperwein, 104 Tex. 43, 133 S. W. 416, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3558 

To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to honor the sacrifices of 

the brave men and women of the Armed Forces who are still prisoner, 

missing, or unaccounted for, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. BILIRAKIS (for himself, Mr. CROWLEY, Mr. RUSH, Mr. BENISHEK, and 

Mr. COOK) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a forever stamp to honor 

the sacrifices of the brave men and women of the Armed 

Forces who are still prisoner, missing, or unaccounted 

for, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Perpetual POW/MIA 

5 Stamp Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

7 The Congress finds that— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3558 IH

1 (1) the Department of Defense reports that 

2 more than 83,000 service members remain missing 

3 since World War II; 

4 (2) the United States Government has an obli5 gation to achieve the fullest possible accounting for 

6 the Americans who have gone missing while serving 

7 the country and to leave no one unaccounted for in 

8 future conflicts; 

9 (3) in 1982, the POW/MIA flag became the 

10 first flag other than the Flag of the United States 

11 to fly over the White House in Washington, DC; 

12 (4) on August 10, 1990, Public Law 101–355 

13 designated the POW/MIA flag as ‘‘The Symbol of 

14 our Nation’s concern and commitment to resolving 

15 as fully as possible the fates of Americans still pris16 oner, missing, and unaccounted for in Southeast 

17 Asia.’’; and 

18 (5) the POW/MIA flag should maintain contin19 ued visibility as a constant reminder of the plight of 

20 America’s Prisoners of War and Missing in Action. 

21 SEC. 3. PERPETUAL POW/MIA STAMP. 

22 (a) IN GENERAL.—In order to continue to honor the 

23 sacrifices of the brave men and women of the Armed 

24 Forces who have been prisoner, missing, or unaccounted 

25 for, the Postmaster General shall provide for the issuance 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3558 IH

1 of a forever stamp suitable for that purpose and depicts 

2 the National League of Families POW/MIA flag. 

3 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this Act, the term 

4 ‘‘forever stamp’’ means a definitive stamp which meets the 

5 postage required for first-class mail up to one ounce in 

6 weight, and which retains full validity for that purpose 

7 even if the rate of that postage is later increased. 

8 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The stamp described in sub9 section (a) shall be issued beginning as soon as practicable 

10 after the date of the enactment of this Act and shall not 

11 thereafter be discontinued. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Support Documents for 

Significant New Use Rule (SNUR) on 

Premanufacture Notice (PMN) 

P-10-136 

EPA Docket EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0577 

EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 33
Index

A-001 Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report for 

PMN P-10-136 

A-002 Initial Review Engineering Report for 

PMN P-10-136 

A-003 Initial Review Exposure Report for 

PMN P-10-136 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 33
A-001 

Structure Activity Team (SAT) Report

for PMN P-10-136 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 33
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 33
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 33
 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 33
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 33
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 33
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 33
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 33
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 33
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 33
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 33
A-002 

Initial Review Engineering Report

for PMN P-10-136 

EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 33
 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 33
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 33
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 33
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 25 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 26 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 27 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 28 of 33
A-003 

Initial Review Exposure Report

for PMN P-10-136 

EPA SANITIZED Page 29 of 33
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 30 of 33
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 31 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 32 of 33
EPA SANITIZED Page 33 of 33
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them.

# DATES:

                        This action was issued on October 7, 2024. See                         **Supplementary Information**                         section for relevant dates.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, 202-622-2480; or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance, 202-622-2490 or                         *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​contact-ofac.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website:                     *https://ofac.treasury.gov.*

## Notice of OFAC Actions

On October 7, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authorities listed below.
      ( print page 82298)          ( print page 82299)          ( print page 82300)          ( print page 82301)          ( print page 82302)    

Lisa M. Palluconi,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2024-23445 Filed 10-9-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT HARPINDER

S. C HAHAL; GUR

M EET K. C HAHAL, Pe titione rs, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 13-70347 Age n c y Nos. A078-361-295

A078-361-296 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Se pte m

be r 23, 2014 * * B e fore : W . FLETC HER , R AW LINSON, a

n d C HR ISTEN, C irc uit Judge s. Ha rpinde r S. C ha

ha l a nd Gurm e e t

K. C ha h a l , native s a

nd c itiz e ns of India , pe tition for re vie w of the B o ard of Im m igration Appe a ls’ (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing the i r m otion to re ope n re m ova l proc e e dings. W e have jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie wfor a

buse of disc re tion theB IA’ s de nia l of a m otion to re ope n. 

# FIL ED OCT 2 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).N

ajmabadi v . Holde r , 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th C ir. 2010). W e de ny the pe tition for re vie w. The B IA did not a

buse its disc re tion by

de ny ing pe titione rs’ third m otion to re ope n a s untim e ly

and num be r-barre d whe re the m otion wa s file d m ore tha n e ight y e ars a fte r the B IA’ s fina l orde r, se e8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(2), an d pe titione rs fa ile d to de m onstra

te c ha nge d c o nditions tha

t qua lify for the re gula

tory e xc e ption to the tim e lim it for filing motions to re ope n, se e8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(c )(3)(ii); N ajmabadi , 597 F.3d a

t 987 (e vide n c e m

ust be “ qua l ita

tive l y diffe re nt” from

the e vide nc e pre s e nte d at the pre vious he aring). The re c ord doe s not support petitione rs’ c onte ntion tha

t the B IA did not fully

c onside r the e vide nc e of polic e ra ids a t Harpinde r’ s fathe r’ s house . PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

1 3 - 7 0 3 4 7 2
EX-35.2
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of October 1, 2012, by and among RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate
Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Midland Loan Services, a
division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real
Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS
2012-C9 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from October 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period October 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Venture Lending & Leasing VII, Inc. (the "Fund") on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Martin D. Eng, Chief Financial Officer of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Fund.





/S/ Martin D. Eng





Martin D. Eng


Chief Financial Officer


March 17, 2015
SHARE

# Connect from anywhere

## Links to internal laboratory resources

                    - E-mail
                    - ORNL Today
                    - Remote access  (GoCitrix)
                    - Remote Access and Communication Applications  (includes remote access instructions for Linux, Mac and Windows systems)
                    - Solution Center -  solution@ornl.gov  or 865-241-6765
# Official Journal C 355/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 355 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6218 October 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 355

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6218 October 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2019/C 355/01 | Publication pursuant to Article 179(4) of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II) | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2019/C 355/01

Publication pursuant to Article 179(4) of Directive 2009/138/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Estate of Del Marcelle: Del Marcelle, Appellant, vs. Estate of Del Marcelle, Respondent.

*March 6*

April *3, 1951.*

*49For the appellant there was a brief by *Martin, Clifford, Warm, Duffy & Dewane*of Green Bay, and oral argument by *Gerald F. Clifford.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *Kaftan, Kaftan & Kaftan*of Green Bay, and oral argument by /. *Robert Kaftan.*

Broadfoot, J.

The claim of Albert Del Marcelle against the estate was based upon the terms of an express oral agreement alleged to have been made between claimant and decedent while decedent was still in the hospital. Claimant alleged that he agreed to take the decedent and his wife into his home and there care for and maintain them, and that in return the decedent agreed to give to claimant a sum equal to one third of all of the property of which he should die seized. The claimant alleged a breach of the agreement and demanded one third of the net estate of the decedent. The claim also contained the following paragraph:

> “In the event the aforesaid contract is held to be void then the claimant demands in the alternative the sum of five thousand and no/100 ($5,000) dollars for care, support, nursing, and maintaining said deceased and his wife, Hortense, and for loss of wages of claimant’s wife.”

Upon this appeal the claimant contends that the trial court erred in finding the claimant had failed to prove .an express *50contract, in failing to grant judgment on *quantum meruit*for services rendered, and in excluding certain testimony offered by the claimant upon the trial.

As to the first contention, the court made the following finding of fact:

> “21. That no contract, express or implied, for payment of more than twenty-five ($25) dollars per week or by which decedent would leave claimants or either of them any part of his estate was created or existed between or among decadent, his wife, and claimants based upon the fact that decedent and his wife lived at claimants’ home and were cared for there.”

This was a question of fact to be determined by the court from the evidence. There was sufficient credible evidence in the record to-sustain this finding, and it cannot be disturbed.

As to the second contention, the court found that the decedent regularly paid to the claimant the sum of $25 per week and claimant accepted such payments for the room, board, and care of the decedent and his wife. Where a stated sum has been regularly paid for such services during decedent’s lifetime, such payments are presumed to have been in full satisfaction thereof unless it is shown that the decedent expressly agreed to make additional payments. *Estate of Breitzman,*236 Wis. 96, 294 N. W. 489. This finding is also supported by the evidence and cannot be disturbed.

We have reviewed the claimed errors on the exclusion of testimony offered by the claimant, and can find no reversible error.

*By the Court.*— That part of the judgment appealed from is affirmed.