alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTER

U. S. Office of Personnel Management

 Number: P-97-11 Date: September 2, 1997 

 Subject: SUPPLEMENTAL CONTRIBUTIONS REQUIRED FOR VSIP'S

In Payroll Office Letter P-96-08, dated October 24, 1996, we described a change in the method by which the

Office of Personnel Management will capture the supplemental contributions due the Civil Service Retirement

and Disability Fund (CSRDF) when your agency makes a Voluntary Separation Incentive Payment (VSIP).

Detailed instructions on reporting and remitting procedures were provided in Payroll Office Letter P-96-08.

Remittances

This letter is to remind you that, effective with separations occurring on or after October 1, 1996, employing

agencies must calculate and remit to the CSRDF the supplemental VSIP contributions required by law. This

new requirement is applicable to all supplemental contributions and all employing agencies paying VSIP's

(including the Department of Defense). These supplemental contributions must be remitted within 30 days

after the end of each quarter. We are sending this letter because we have not received VSIP contributions

from some agencies which have paid VSIP's this fiscal year. If you have not forwarded all monies due to

OPM under the VSIP program, please remit the funds by the end of this fiscal year. On the day you are

making payment, please remember to fax the supporting schedule "Agency Contributions Due to Voluntary

Retirement Incentive Payments" and use a separate schedule for separations on or after October 1, 1997.

CPDF Reports

In order to assist you in determining the number of VSIP's which your agency paid during the first two

quarters of FY 1997, we are enclosing reports which were developed using data submitted by your agency

to the Central Personnel Data File (CPDF). The enclosed CPDF Summary Report includes only records with

valid basic pay and valid VSIP legal authority codes. The accompanying CPDF Detailed Report may include

more records than the Summary Report since it includes all records with a VSIP nature of action code and

separation date falling within the specified quarter. These CPDF reports should only be used as a tool in

accounting for employees separating with VSIP's; they may not include all VSIP's paid by the agency because

of delayed agency submissions, submission errors, etc. 
If you have any questions about this letter or the enclosed reports, please contact Harriet Horvitz on (202) 606-

4843 or via email, finance@opm.gov. 

William J. Washington, Chief

Financial Management Division

Retirement and Insurance Service
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MADELEINE BARLOW, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

STATE OF WASHINGTON, DBA 

Washington State University, 

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 21-35397 

D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05186-BHS 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

Benjamin H. Settle, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 12, 2022

Submission Vacated June 23, 2022

Resubmitted March 26, 2024

Seattle, Washington

Before: BOGGS,** HURWITZ, and SUNG, Circuit Judges.

The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the defendant State 

of Washington, d/b/a Washington State University (University), on Madeleine 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Danny J. Boggs, United States Circuit Judge for the 

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAR 26 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 

Barlow’s Title IX and state-law negligence claims. We previously affirmed the 

summary judgment on the Title IX claim. Barlow v. Washington, No. 21-25297, 

2022 WL 2256318 (9th Cir. June 23, 2022). We certified to the Washington State 

Supreme Court the dispositive questions of state law, relating to whether the 

University owed Barlow a duty in negligence under the circumstances of this case. 

Barlow v. Washington, 38 F.4th 62, 67 (9th Cir. 2022). The Washington Supreme 

Court accepted our certification request, and rendered an opinion on the certified 

questions on January 4, 2024. Barlow v. Washington, 540 P.3d 783 (Wash. 2024),

reconsideration denied, Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration, No. 101045-1

(Wash. Mar. 12, 2024). In light of that opinion, we affirm the grant of summary 

judgment on the remaining state-law negligence claim.

Under Washington law, the general rule is that people and businesses have no 

duty to protect others from third-party conduct subject to certain exceptions, 

“including when a special relationship exists between the actor and the perpetrator 

or between the actor and the plaintiff/victim.” Id. In Barlow, the Washington 

Supreme Court held that state law “recognizes a special relationship between a 

university and its students, giving rise to a duty to use reasonable care to protect 

students from foreseeable injury at the hands of other students.” Id. at 785. “The duty 

exists where a student is on campus, similar to a business invitee, or involved in 

university sponsored activities.” Id. Here, it is undisputed that the third-party 
3 

conduct that harmed Barlow occurred off-campus and outside of a 

university-sponsored activity. Therefore, the University did not owe Barlow a duty 

to protect her from that third-party conduct, and it is entitled to summary judgment 

on the state-law negligence claim. 

AFFIRMED.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NOVEMBER 27, 2013

NO. 03-12-00042-CR

Cleveland Clark, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PURYEAR AND FIELD

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the trial court on December 1, 2011. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the judgment of 

conviction.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
**Highlands
      Acquisition Corp.**




**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip
      A. Baratelli, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                May 9, 2008
            *By:*
            */s/
                Philip A. Baratelli*Name:
            Philip
                A. BaratelliTitle:
            Chief
                Financial Officer(Principal
                Financial Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

| Date: November 13, 2009 |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |   |
|                    | By:    | /s/Patrick Giordano |
|                    | Name:  | Patrick Giordano |
|                    | Title: | President, Chief Executive Officer, |
|                    |   | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and |
|                    |   | Director (Principal Executive, Financial |
|                    |   | and Accounting Officer) |

----
#### BIERWORTH v. STATE.

No. 20175.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

McClintock & Robertson, of Childress, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; the punishment, a fine of $150 and confinement in jail for 60 days.

The statement of facts cannot be considered as it is in question and answer form without a certificate on the part of the judge that in his opinion the questions and answers were necessary to elucidate the facts. See 4 Texas Jurisprudence, page 405.

In the absence of the statement of facts we are unable to appraise appellant’s bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-6 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

[Signature Page Follows]



---

Date: March 30, 2016



|                     
|---------------------
|/s/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL
|Somsak Chivavibul    

President and Chief Financial Officer

(Senior Securitization Officer)

Navient Funding, LLC
EXHIBIT 32.1

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mike Lizarraga, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Madero, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Madero, Inc.


Date: July 21, 2008                   By: /s/ Mike Lizarraga
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Mike Lizarraga
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81924-81925]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23361]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Centers for Research in Emerging 
Infectious Diseases (CREID) Network (U01 Clinical Trial Not 
Allowed).
    Date: November 6-8, 2024.
    Time: 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A,

[[Page 81925]]

Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Annie Walker-Abbey, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E70A, 
Rockville, MD 20892, 240-627-3390, [email protected].

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 3, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23361 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA
F OURTH D ISTRICT

WAYNE PARKER TREACY , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 18

- 1030

[September 6, 2018 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Timothy L. Bailey

, Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 006720CF10A

.

Jason T. Forman of Law Offices of Jason T. Forman, P.A., Fort Lauderdale , for appellant.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirmed.

W ARNER , F ORST , and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 9, 2007
    /s/ Doug RockDoug RockChairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Operating OfficerDate:  August 9, 2007
    /s/ Margaret K. DormanMargaret K. DormanSenior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 35.1



Annual Servicer Compliance Certificate

pursuant to

Section 3.9 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement

and

Item 1123 of Regulation AB








USAA AUTO
OWNER TRUST 2012-1








The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of USAA Federal
Savings Bank, as servicer (in such capacity, the “Servicer”) under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as
of September 19, 2012 (as amended and supplemented, or otherwise modified and in effect from time to time, the “Sale and
Servicing Agreement”), by and among USAA Auto Owner Trust 2012-1, USAA Acceptance, LLC, the Servicer and The Bank of
New York Mellon, as Indenture Trustee, does hereby certify that:

| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from September 19, 2012
through December 31, 2012, and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all
of its obligations in all material respects under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout such period.                     



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this
Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 29th day of March, 2013.





| | /s/ Anthony Warden                | 
| | --------------------------------- | 
| | Name:  Anthony Warden             | 
| | Title:  AVP Member Debt Solutions |
FINAL WEST VIRGINIA STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISION

FOR CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 110(A)(2)(A)-(M) REQUIREMENTS

FOR OZONE AND FINE PARTICULATES

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

On August 21, 2009, the Division of Air Quality (DAQ) commenced a thirty day public

comment period to accept written comments and/or a written request for a public hearing on a

proposed revision to the State Implementation Plan which demonstrates that West Virginia has

adequate resources and authority to implement the 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS and the 2008 8-hour ozone

NAAQS. Additionally in this plan revision, the state is supplementing its existing Section

110(a)(2)(A)-(M) infrastructure SIP for the 1997 PM2.5 and 8-hour ozone NAAQS, only with respect

to the enforcement authority requirements under CAA Section 110(a)(2)(C).

Written comments were accepted through 6:00 PM on Monday, September 21, 2009. No

commenter submitted written comments regarding the proposed implementation plan revision, and

no person requested a public hearing. Consequently, DAQ published in the West Virginia Register

on September 25, 2009, a public notice announcing that a public hearing will not be held.
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A19A0359. In the Interest of D.M., a Child.

This appeal was originally docketed on May 29, 2018, pursuant to a notice of

appeal directing that the entire record, including transcripts of all proceedings in the

Juvenile Court, be transmitted to this Court as part of the record on appeal. On June

8, 2018, Appellant filed a motion to remand the appeal to the Juvenile Court for

completion of the record. The motion represented to this Court that transcripts of

recorded hearings in the Juvenile Court necessary for consideration of the appeal

were not included in the record transmitted to this Court, and have not yet been

transcribed by a court reporter. Thus, on June 20, 2018, Appellant’s motion was

granted and the case was remanded.

On August 14, 2018, the court reporter filed transcripts of the proceedings with

the Juvenile Court, and on the same day, the Juvenile Court transmitted the case to

the Court of Appeals. The appeal was re-docketed on September 10, 2018. Upon

review, it was discovered that portions of the testimony were not reported. 

Additionally, on September 12, 2018, the Motion for New Trial was heard in the

Juvenile Court. The Court reserved ruling, requested additional briefing, and has not

yet rendered a decision, nor has a transcript been prepared from the hearing.

Appellant has requested that this case again be remanded so as to allow the

Juvenile Court to render its ruling in the Motion for New Trial, and if necessary,

allow the court reporter to prepare the transcript and file it in. 

October 24, 2018
Accordingly, it is ordered that the Appellant’s motion to remand is GRANTED

and this case is REMANDED to the trial court. Upon preparation and filing of the

necessary record in the Juvenile Court, the Clerk of the Juvenile Court shall transmit

the entire record to this Court for re-docketing.

 

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

10/24/2018
Financial Management Letter F-97-11 was not issued.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 365 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 365

   To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a notice and 
  comment rulemaking before implementing certain policies relating to 
  obstruction evaluation aeronautical studies, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2015

  Mr. Cohen (for himself and Mr. Schweikert) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and 
                             Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a notice and 
  comment rulemaking before implementing certain policies relating to 
  obstruction evaluation aeronautical studies, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. OBSTRUCTION EVALUATION AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.

    The Secretary of Transportation may implement the policy set forth 
in the notice of proposed policy entitled ``Proposal To Consider the 
Impact of One Engine Inoperative Procedures in Obstruction Evaluation 
Aeronautical Studies'' published by the Department of Transportation on 
April 28, 2014 (79 Fed. Reg. 23300), only if the policy is adopted 
pursuant to notice and comment rulemaking and, for purposes of 
Executive Order 12866 (5 U.S.C. 601 note; relating to regulatory 
planning and review), is treated as a significant regulatory action 
within the scope of section 3(f)(1) of such Order.
                                 <all>
```