alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| Citibank, N.A.                        | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware |
| As AART Indenture Trustee             | As AART Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Kristen Driscoll     | 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 |
| 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor | Wilimington, DE 19805-1266 |
| New York, NY 10013                    |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |
|   |   |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | AART 2012-SN1 - Administration Agreement |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Administrator during the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Administration Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Administrator has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Administration Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
ZIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MOrLOA „„.; 

AF 06-0216 

AUG 2 9 2023 

Bowen Greenwood 

Clerk of Supf : rne Court 

State of Montana 

IN THE MA ITER OF APPOINTMENTS TO 

THE SUPREME COURT COMMISSION ON 

TECHNOLOGY 

ORDER 

The terms of the Honorable James Jeremiah Shea, Beth McLaughlin, and Bowen 

Greenwood expired on March 31, 2023. The Court thanks each of them for their service 

to the Commission, to this Court, and to the people of Montana. 

IT IS ORDERED that the Honorable James Jeremiah Shea, Beth McLaughlin, and 

Bowen Greenwood are hereby reappointed to the Commission for terms expiring March 

31, 2026. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to each member of the 

Commission on Technology, and to the State Bar of Montana. 

`1•7^- 

DATED this . t day of August, 2023. 

Chief Justice 

Vl 

( g4-

,011 44 1 L 

21"m--Justices 

08/30/2023

Case Number: AF 06-0216
Deutsche Mortgage&Asset Receiving Corporation

60 Wall Street

New York, NY 10005





RE: Annual Statement of Compliance



The undersigned, a duly authorized officer
of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator and Paying Agent for the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (in such capacity,
"Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2014 (the "reporting period"):





| | (a) | A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the
applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision;
and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations
under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







March 4, 2015







Brian Smith

Vice President









To:Deutsche
Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation



Schedule A





List
of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series





Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of November 1, 2012, by and among DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,
and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent
and Custodian relating to the Series COMM 2012-CCRE4 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates , relating to the Prince Building
Loan Combination, a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series COMM 2012-CCRE3 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
transaction.









To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation



Schedule B





Material
Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations



Not Applicable
No. 72-6240.

#### Lanham *v.*United States.

C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3373 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans 

Affairs to review certain whistleblower complaints. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. LOWENTHAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to review certain whistleblower 

complaints. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVIEW OF WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Chapter 7 of title 38, United 

5 States Code, is amended by inserting after section 711 the 

6 following new section: 

7 ‘‘§ 712. Review of whistleblower complaints 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—During each calendar quarter, 

9 the Secretary shall review each covered whistleblower com10 plaint that is filed during the previous calendar quarter. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3373 IH

1 ‘‘(b) DELEGATION.—The Secretary may only dele2 gate the authority of the Secretary under subsection (a) 

3 to review a covered whistleblower complaint, without fur4 ther delegation, to— 

5 ‘‘(1) the Deputy Secretary of Veterans Affairs; 

6 ‘‘(2) the Under Secretary for Health; 

7 ‘‘(3) the Under Secretary for Benefits; 

8 ‘‘(4) the Under Secretary for Memorial Affairs; 

9 ‘‘(5) an Assistant Secretary of Veterans Affairs; 

10 ‘‘(6) a Deputy Assistant Secretary of Veterans 

11 Affairs; or 

12 ‘‘(7) a director of the Veterans Integrated Serv13 ice Network. 

14 ‘‘(c) COVERED WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINT DE15 FINED.—In this section, the term ‘covered whistleblower 

16 complaint’ means any complaint filed with the Office of 

17 the Special Counsel under subchapter II of chapter 12 of 

18 title 5 with respect to a prohibited personnel practice com19 mitted by an officer or employee of the Department of 

20 Veterans Affairs and described in section 2302(b)(8) or 

21 2302(b)(9)(A)(i), (B), (C), or (D) of such title.’’. 

22 (b) CLERICAL AMENDMENT.—The table of sections 

23 at the beginning of such chapter is amended by inserting 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3373 IH

1 after the item relating to section 711 the following new 

2 item: 

‘‘712. Review of whistleblower complaints.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 10.18

 


	
502 West Office Center Drive
   Fort Washington, PA 19034
   Phone: 215.461.2000
   Fax: 215.461.2006
   www.vitaepharma.com
    	
 
    	

    




 

July 21, 2008

 

Richard E. Gregg, MD

 

Dear Dick:

 

You and Vitae Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) signed an offer letter dated January 28, 2008 (the “Offer Letter”). To avoid potential adverse tax consequences imposed by Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the Offer Letter is hereby amended by inserting the following new provisions at the end of the Offer Letter:

 

Separation from Service. Wherever this Offer Letter refers to a termination of employment, termination of service or similar event, including (without limitation) a termination without cause or involuntary termination, the reference will be construed as a Separation, as defined below. This paragraph supersedes any contrary provision of this Offer Letter.

 

Release and Commencement of Payments. If this Offer Letter requires that you execute a release of claims in order to receive severance benefits, the Company will deliver the form of release to you within 30 days after your Separation, as defined below. You must execute and return the release within the period of time set forth in the form of release provided by the Company. The salary continuation payments under this Offer Letter will commence within 30 days after you return the release.

 

Mandatory Deferral of Payments. If the Company determines that you are a “specified employee” under Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code at the time of your Separation, as defined below, then (a) the salary continuation payments under this Offer Letter, to the extent that they are subject to Section 409A of the Code, will commence during the seventh month after your Separation and (b) the installments that otherwise would have been paid during the first six months after your Separation will be paid in a lump sum when the salary continuation payments commence. If applicable, this paragraph supersedes any contrary provision of this Offer Letter.

 

Definition. For all purposes under this Offer Letter, “Separation” means a “separation from service,” as defined in the regulations under Section 409A of the Code.

 

Except as expressly set forth above, the Offer Letter will remain in effect without change.

 

You may indicate your agreement with this amendment of the Offer Letter by signing and dating the enclosed duplicate original of this letter agreement and returning it to me.

 











 

This letter agreement may be executed in two counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but both of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

 

 


	
 
    	
Very truly   yours,
    
	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
VITAE   PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
By:
    	
/s/ Pauline Javorski
    
	
 
    	
Title:
    	
HR Manager
    




 

I have read and accept this amendment:

 

	
/s/ Richard Gregg
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Dated:
    	
July 24, 2008
    	
 
    


 

2
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 

Dated March 17, 2015

 
|   | /s/ Erin M. Rohde                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Erin M. Rohde                         |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|   | Trust 2012-C                          |

 

----
#### JACKSON v. STATE.

No. 14622.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 23, 1932.

E. T. Miller, of Amarillo, for1 appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment one year in the penitentiary.

In the indictment L. A. Goetz is alleged to have been the purchaser. The evidence shows that the witness Goetz had been employed by the sheriff at an agreed salary of $100 per month to detect violators of the liquor law. Goetz testified that on the 13th day of September, 1930, at about 8 o’clock p. m., he bought two pints of whisky from appellant; that appellant had the whisky in a gallon container in his coupé, up behind the seat, and poured the whisky from this container into two pint bottles which witness had provided. Witness said he delivered one of the pints to the sheriff that same night. This was confirmed by the sheriff. Appellant denied the transaction. He introduced evidence which, if believed by the jury, would have shown that appellant was not with Goetz at the time the sale is claimed by the witness to have been made. The jury decided the fact issue in favor of the state.

In his motion for new trial, appellant set up claimed newly discovered evidence from one H. B. Burns, which motion is supported by the attached affidavit of the witness. The motion and the facts contained in said affidavit were controverted by the state, which was also supported by affidavit. The order overruling the motion for new trial recites that, after “having heard the evidence submitted both by the defendant, and by the State, touching the matters and things set forth in said motion,” the court is of opinion the motion should.be overruled. The evidence presented on the motion is not brought before us. We must presume that it supported the court’s action. See Fisher v. State, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 536, 5 S.W.(2d) 996, and cases therein cited.

The judgment is affirmed.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 11-304 Date: June 2011 

Subject: Changes to FERS Contribution Rates for Fiscal Year 2012 

 At its 2010 meeting, the Board of Actuaries of the Civil Service Retirement System recommended 

revised economic assumptions for use in actuarial valuations of CSRS and FERS. These new 

normal cost percentages will increase the employer contributions that agencies pay for FERS 

employees. 

 

While agency payments under CSRS are not affected by the CSRS normal cost percentages for the 

vast majority of agencies, the CSRS normal cost percentages are used to determine the dynamic 

actuarial liabilities which are included in Governmental financial statements. The Fiscal Year 2011 

Factors for Calculating Imputed Costs Benefits Administration Letter, to be published in August, 

2011 will provide the cost factors agencies should use for reporting actuarial liabilities in their 

Agency Financial Reports. 

New employer contribution rates will become effective with the first pay period beginning on or 

after October 1, 2011. 

The following table summarizes changes to FERS contribution rates: 

Category

FERS Agency Contribution Rate (%)

CPDF 

Code Current 10/2011

Regular K 11.7 11.9

Law Enforcement Officer M 25.7 26.3

Air Traffic Controller L 25.5 26.0

Military Reserve Technician N 14.5 14.9

Employees under section 303 of 

the CIA Act of 1964 for certain employees 

(when serving abroad) 

NONE 16.8 17.2

Member of Congress NONE 17.9 18.3

Congressional Employee NONE 16.4 16.7

If you have any questions about this letter, feel free to email us at finance@opm.gov. You may 

also call us at 202-606-0606.

 

 Emily Dean, 

 Associate Chief Financial Officer, 

Financial Services
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlas Resources Public 17-2008 (B) L.P. (the "Partnership") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General Partner,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and


(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





By:
/s/ Freddie M. KotekName:
Freddie M. KotekTitle:
Chief Executive Officer of the Managing General PartnerDate:
August 13, 2009
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Jung E. Park, Appellant. </font></b></div><br><br><p>Jung E. Park, appellant pro se.Tuckahoe Village Attorney's Office (Gary Gjertsen of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Justice Court of the Village of Tuckahoe, Westchester County (David Otis Fuller, Jr., J.), rendered February 6, 2018. The judgment, after a nonjury trial, convicted defendant of disobeying a traffic control device, and imposed sentence.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>Defendant was convicted, following a nonjury trial, of disobeying a traffic control device (Vehicle and Traffic Law ยง 1110 [a]). To the extent that defendant's contention on appeal is that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish her guilt, by not moving for dismissal on this ground in the Justice Court, defendant failed to preserve this claim for appellate review (<i>see </i>CPL 470.05 [2]; <i>People v Hawkins</i>, 11 NY3d 484, 491-492 [2008]; <i>People v Gray</i>, 86 NY2d 10, 19โ��20 [1995]), and we decline to review it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (<i>see </i>CPL 470.15 [3] [c]). However, to the extent that defendant's contention is that the verdict of guilt was against the weight of the evidence, this contention needs no preservation (<i>see People v Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342 [2007]). Upon a review of the record, while according great deference to the Justice Court's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear their testimony, and observe their demeanor (<i>see People v Lane</i>, 7 NY3d 888, 890 [2006]; <i>People v Bleakley</i>, 69 NY2d 490, 495 [1987]), we are of the opinion that the verdict should not be disturbed, as the trial court gave the evidence the weight it should be accorded (<i>see</i> CPL 470.15 [5]; <i>Danielson</i>, 9 NY3d 342). Consequently, we find that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence.</p><p>Accordingly, the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>ADAMS, P.J., RUDERMAN and EMERSON, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: January 30, 2020<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### FOX v. STATE.

No. 17182.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 2, 1935.

’■Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant wds tried and convicted of the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

An inspection of the indictment discloses that the same is defective in that it merely charges the appellant with the “unlawful possession, for the purpose of sale, of liquor capable of producing intoxication.” In the case of Offield v. State, 75 S.W.(2d) 882, this court, in passing upon a similar indictment, held the same insufficient. We do not deem it necessary to again discuss the error therein pointed out, but refer to the same for a full discussion thereof.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be, and the same is hereby, reversed and the prosecution is ordered dismissed and the appellant discharged.

PER OURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3465 

To enhance the services of the Office of Contracts and Procurement at 

the Department of Transportation to assist modal agencies, States, and 

grant recipients with certain design and procurement practices and contracts. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 

Mr. SEAN PATRICK MALONEY of New York introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To enhance the services of the Office of Contracts and Procurement at the Department of Transportation to assist 

modal agencies, States, and grant recipients with certain 

design and procurement practices and contracts. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Public-Private Part5 nership Infrastructure Investment Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3465 IH

1 SEC. 2. ASSISTANCE WITH PROCUREMENT. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The senior procurement executive 

3 of the Department of Transportation shall enhance the 

4 services of the Office of Contracts and Procurement by— 

5 (1) working with modal agencies, States, and 

6 other grant recipients on implementing design-bid7 build, design-build, and public-private partnerships 

8 (P3s) procurement best practices, including model 

9 contracts; and 

10 (2) shall develop suggested best practices to en11 courage standardizing state P3 authorities and prac12 tices, including fair and balanced assumptions made 

13 in the calculations, consistency on unsolicited bids, 

14 non-compete clauses, and other major elements. 

15 (b) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the 

16 term ‘‘P3’’ means contractual agreements formed between 

17 a public agency and a private sector entity that allow for 

18 greater private sector participation in the delivery and fi19 nancing of transportation projects. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 99.1      **FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE**   November 13, 2007 Contact: John Beaver (713) 654-9548 **STERLING CHEMICALS ANNOUNCES STYRENE BUSINESS EXIT TO PURSUE**
SHARE

# User Entry Pass

The User Entry Pass is provided to approved visitors to help expedite your entry through security access points at ORNL.  Present the entry pass, along with Real ID compliant identification, and you will be directed to the ORNL Visitor Center for assistance with visitor processing.
                    - Approximately 7 days before your scheduled visit, you will receive an email from ORNL with an attached User Entry Pass.
                    - Print the User Entry Pass and bring it with you when you visit ORNL.
                    - Show the User Entry Pass and a photo ID to the security guard and the staff at the Visitors Center to expedite your access.
                    - The pass also provides a map for locating the ORNL Visitor Center (or the LSS office if arriving after hours or on the weekend).
                    - Note : After hours or weekend arrival must be prearranged with local contact or host.