4274 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

(3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable 

level of safety may be used for any repair 

required by this AD if it is approved by the 

Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization 

Designation Authorization (ODA) that has 

been authorized by the Manager, Seattle 

ACO, to make those findings. For a repair 

method to be approved, the repair must meet 

the certification basis of the airplane and the 

approval must specifically refer to this AD. 

(4) AMOCs approved previously for AD 

2001–04–09, Amendment 39–12128 (66 FR 

13227, March 5, 2001), are approved as 

AMOCs for the corresponding requirements 

of this AD. 

(s) Related Information 

(1) For more information about this AD, 

contact Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer, 

Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM–130S, 

FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057– 

3356; phone: 425–917–6418; fax: (425) 917– 

6590; email: marie.hogestad@faa.gov. 

(2) Service information identified in this 

AD that is not incorporated by reference in 

this AD may be obtained at the addresses 

specified in paragraphs (t)(7) and (t)(8) of this 

AD. 

(t) Material Incorporated by Reference 

(1) The Director of the Federal Register 

approved the incorporation by reference 

(IBR) of the service information listed in this 

paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR 

part 51. 

(2) You must use this service information 

as applicable to do the actions required by 

this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. 

(3) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on March 3, 2014. 

(i) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0186, 

dated June 25, 2007. 

(ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0187, 

dated June 25, 2007. 

(iii) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0200, 

dated June 25, 2007. 

(iv) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0201, 

dated June 27, 2007. 

(v) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0202, 

Revision 1, dated February 21, 2008. 

(vi) Boeing Service Bulletin 767–27–0203, 

Revision 1, dated February 21, 2008. 

(4) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on November 28, 2007 (72 

FR 67236, November 28, 2007). 

(i) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 767–27–0197, Revision 1, dated July 

19, 2007. 

(ii) Boeing Special Attention Service 

Bulletin 767–27–0198, Revision 1, dated July 

19, 2007. 

(5) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on March 20, 2001 (66 FR 

13227, March 5, 2001). 

(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

27A0168, dated November 21, 2000. 

(ii) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

27A0169, dated November 21, 2000. 

(6) The following service information was 

approved for IBR on September 11, 2000 (65 

FR 51754, August 25, 2000). 

(i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 767– 

27A0166, dated August 17, 2000. 

(ii) Reserved. 

(7) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Boeing Commercial 

Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services 

Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65, 

Seattle, WA 98124–2207; telephone 206– 

544–5000, extension 1; fax 206–766–5680; 

Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. 

(8) You may view this service information 

at FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 

Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For 

information on the availability of this 

material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221. 

(9) You may view this service information 

that is incorporated by reference at the 

National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For information on 

the availability of this material at NARA, call 

202–741–6030, or go to: http://

www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibrlocations.html. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on 

December 4, 2013. 

John P. Piccola, 

Acting Manager, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–01433 Filed 1–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Parts 52 and 70 

[EPA–R07–OAR–2013–0765; FRL–9905–66– 

Region–7] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; State of 

Kansas; Annual Emissions Fee and 

Annual Emissions Inventory 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Direct final rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is taking direct final 

action to approve a revision to the 

Kansas State Implementation Plan (SIP) 

and Operating Permits Program. EPA is 

approving a revision to the Kansas rule 

entitled ‘‘Annual Emissions Fee.’’ These 

revisions align the State’s reporting 

requirements with the Federal Air 

Emissions Reporting Requirements Rule 

(AERR). 

DATES: This direct final rule will be 

effective on March 28, 2014, without 

further notice, unless EPA receives 

adverse comment by February 26, 2014. 

If EPA receives adverse comment, we 

will publish a timely withdrawal of the 

direct final rule in the Federal Register 

informing the public that the rule will 

not take effect. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07– 

OAR–2013–0765, by one of the 

following methods: 

1. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

2. Email: kemp.lachala@epa.gov 

3. Mail or Hand Delivery: Lachala 

Kemp, Environmental Protection 

Agency, Air Planning and Development 

Branch, 11201 Renner Boulevard, 

Lenexa, Kansas 66219. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2013– 

0765. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit through 

www.regulations.gov or email 

information that you consider to be CBI 

or otherwise protected. The 

www.regulations.gov Web site is an 

‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which 

means EPA will not know your identity 

or contact information unless you 

provide it in the body of your comment. 

If you send an email comment directly 

to EPA without going through 

www.regulations.gov, your email 

address will be automatically captured 

and included as part of the comment 

that is placed in the public docket and 

made available on the Internet. If you 

submit an electronic comment, EPA 

recommends that you include your 

name and other contact information in 

the body of your comment and with any 

disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA 

cannot read your comment due to 

technical difficulties and cannot contact 

you for clarification, EPA may not be 

able to consider your comment. 

Electronic files should avoid the use of 

special characters, any form of 

encryption, and be free of any defects or 

viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the docket 

are listed in the www.regulations.gov 

index. Although listed in the index, 

some information is not publicly 

available, i.e., CBI or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Certain other material, such as 

copyrighted material, will be publicly 

available only in hard copy form. 

Publicly available docket materials are 

available either electronically in 

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

the Environmental Protection Agency, 

Air Planning and Development Branch, 

11201 Renner Boulevard, Lenexa, 

Kansas 66219. The Regional Office’s 

official hours of business are Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 to 4:30 excluding 

Federal holidays. The interested persons 

wanting to examine these documents 

should make an appointment with the 

office at least 24 hours in advance. 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 4275 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Lachala Kemp at (913) 551–7214, or by 

email at kemp.lachala@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ 

or ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA. This section 

provides additional information by 

addressing the following: 

I. What is being addressed in this document? 

II. Have the requirements for approval of a 

SIP revision been met? 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

I. What is being addressed in this 

document? 

EPA is approving revisions to the 

Kansas SIP and Operating Permits 

Program submitted to EPA in a letter 

dated April 15, 2011. On December 17, 

2008, EPA finalized the Air Emissions 

Reporting Requirements Rule (AERR). 

This rule outlines EPA’s emission 

inventory reporting requirements. In the 

December 17, 2008 action, EPA 

consolidated, reduced and simplified 

the current requirements; added limited 

new requirements; provided additional 

flexibility to the states in the ways they 

collect and report emissions data; and 

accelerated the reporting of emissions 

data to EPA by state and local agencies. 

Revisions to the SIP amend KAR 28–19– 

202 Annual Emissions Fee to align the 

State’s reporting requirements with 

EPA’s reporting requirements. 

Specifically, the State moved the 

Emissions Inventory Questionnaire 

(EIQ) due date from June 1 to April 1; 

removed the minimum thresholds for 

assessing emissions fees for class I 

stationary sources; and modified the 

State’s late fee structure. The State 

increased the emissions fee in paragraph 

(c) from $25 per ton to $37 per ton. The 

Emissions Fees are an integral part of 

the Title V operating permit program, 

but not approved as part of the SIP. 

Kansas’ amendments ensure that their 

reporting requirements align with EPA’s 

AERR. EPA has conducted an analysis 

of the State’s amendments and 

concluded that these do not adversely 

affect the stringency of the SIP. 

II. Have the requirements for approval 

of a SIP revision been met? 

The state submission has met the 

public notice requirements of SIP 

submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 

51.102. The submission also satisfied 

the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 

appendix V. In addition, the revisions 

meet the substantive SIP requirements 

of the CAA, including section 110 and 

implementing regulations. 

III. What action is EPA taking? 

EPA is approving the request to 

amend the Kansas SIP and operating 

permits program by approving the 

State’s request to amend KAR 28–19– 

202 Annual Emissions Fee to align the 

State’s rule with EPA’s reporting 

requirements. Approval of these 

revisions will ensure consistency 

between state and Federally-approved 

rules. EPA has determined that these 

changes will not relax the SIP or 

adversely impact air emissions. 

We are processing this action as a 

direct final action because the revisions 

make routine changes to the existing 

rules which are noncontroversial. 

Therefore, we do not anticipate any 

adverse comments. Please note that if 

EPA receives adverse comment on part 

of this rule and if that part can be 

severed from the remainder of the rule, 

EPA may adopt as final those parts of 

the rule that are not the subject of an 

adverse comment. 

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews 

Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 

51735, October 4, 1993), this action is 

not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and 

therefore is not subject to review under 

Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 (76 

FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action 

is also not subject to Executive Order 

13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations 

That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 

Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May 

22, 2001). This action merely approves 

state law as meeting Federal 

requirements and imposes no additional 

requirements beyond those imposed by 

state law. Accordingly, the 

Administrator certifies that this rule 

will not have a significant economic 

impact on a substantial number of small 

entities under the Regulatory Flexibility 

Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this 

rule approves pre-existing requirements 

under state law and does not impose 

any additional enforceable duty beyond 

that required by state law, it does not 

contain any unfunded mandate or 

significantly or uniquely affect small 

governments, as described in the 

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 

(Pub. L. 104–4). 

This rule also does not have tribal 

implications because it will not have a 

substantial direct effect on one or more 

Indian tribes, on the relationship 

between the Federal Government and 

Indian tribes, or on the distribution of 

power and responsibilities between the 

Federal Government and Indian tribes, 

as specified by Executive Order 13175 

(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This 

action also does not have Federalism 

implications because it does not have 

substantial direct effects on the States, 

on the relationship between the national 

government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government, as specified in 

Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, 

August 10, 1999). Thus Executive Order 

13132 does not apply to this action. 

This action merely approves a state rule 

implementing a Federal standard, and 

does not alter the relationship or the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities established in the CAA. 

This rule also is not subject to Executive 

Order 13045, ‘‘Protection of Children 

from Environmental Health Risks and 

Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 

1997) because it approves a state rule 

implementing a Federal standard. 

In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s 

role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. In this context, in the absence 

of a prior existing requirement for the 

State to use voluntary consensus 

standards (VCS), EPA has no authority 

to disapprove a state submission for 

failure to use VCS. It would thus be 

inconsistent with applicable law for 

EPA when it reviews a state submission, 

to use VCS in place of a state 

submission that otherwise satisfies the 

provisions of the CAA. Thus, the 

requirements of section 12(d) of the 

National Technology Transfer and 

Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 

272 note) do not apply. This action does 

not impose an information collection 

burden under the provisions of the 

Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Burden is defined 

at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this rule and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. 

A major rule cannot take effect until 

60 days after it is published in the 

Federal Register. This action is not a 

‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 

804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by March 28, 2014. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this rule for the 

purposes of judicial review nor does it 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES
4276 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 17 / Monday, January 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. Parties with 

objections to this direct final rule are 

encouraged to file a comment in 

response to the parallel notice of 

proposed rulemaking for this action 

published in the proposed rules section 

of today’s Federal Register, rather than 

file an immediate petition for judicial 

review of this direct final rule, so that 

EPA can withdraw this direct final rule 

and address the comment in the final 

rulemaking. This action may not be 

challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2).) 

List of Subjects 

40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 

Incorporation by reference, 

Intergovernmental relations, Lead, 

Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate 

matter, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile 

organic compounds. 

40 CFR Part 70 

Administrative practice and 

procedure, Air pollution control, 

Intergovernmental relations, Operating 

permits, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: January 8, 2014. 

Karl Brooks, 

Regional Administrator, Region 7. 

Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 

Federal Regulations is amended as 

follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart R—Kansas 

■ 2. In § 52.870 the table in paragraph 

(c) is amended by adding new entry 

K.A.R. 28–19–202 in numerical order 

under subheading ‘‘General Provisions’’ 

to read as follows: 

§ 52.870 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(c) * * * 

EPA-APPROVED KANSAS REGULATIONS

Kansas 

citation Title 

State 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

Kansas Department of Health and Environment Ambient Air Quality Standards and Air Pollution Control 

*******

General Provisions 

* * * * * * * 

K.A.R. 28–19–202 ... Annual Emissions 

Fee.

11/5/2010 1/27/2014 [insert Federal Register 

page number where the document begins].

Paragraph (c), has not been approved 

as part of the SIP. 

* * * * * * * 

* * * * * 

PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT 

PROGRAMS 

■ 3. The authority citation for Part 70 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq. 

■ 4. Appendix A to Part 70 is amended 

by adding paragraph (f) under Kansas to 

read as follows: 

Appendix A to Part 70—Approval 

Status of State and Local Operating 

Permits Programs 

* * * * * 

Kansas 

* * * * * 

(f) The Kansas Department of Health and 

Environment submitted revisions to Kansas 

Administrative Record (KAR) 28–19–202 and 

28–19–517 on April 15, 2011; approval of 

section (c) effective March 28, 2014. 

* * * * * 

[FR Doc. 2014–01185 Filed 1–24–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration 

50 CFR Part 665 

[Docket No. 131028907–4042–02] 

RIN 0648–XC954 

Pacific Island Fisheries; 2014 Annual 

Catch Limits and Accountability 

Measures 

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries 

Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Final specifications. 

SUMMARY: In this rule, NMFS specifies 

the 2014 annual catch limits for Pacific 

Island bottomfish, crustacean, precious 

coral, and coral reef ecosystem fisheries, 

and accountability measures to correct 

or mitigate any overages of catch limits. 

The catch limits and accountability 

measures support the long-term 

sustainability of fishery resources of the 

U.S. Pacific Islands. 

DATES: The final specifications are 

effective February 26, 2014, through 

December 31, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: Copies of the fishery 

ecosystem plans are available from the 

Western Pacific Fishery Management 

Council (Council), 1164 Bishop St., 

Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, tel 

808–522–8220, fax 808–522–8226, or 

www.wpcouncil.org. Copies of the 

environmental assessments and findings 

of no significant impact for this action, 

identified by NOAA–NMFS–2013–0156, 

are available from www.regulations.gov, 

or from Michael D. Tosatto, Regional 


pmangrum on DSK3VPTVN1PROD with RULES