alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3

 

THERAVANCE, INC.

POLICY FOR NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR STOCK OPTIONS

EFFECTIVE JUNE 2, 2014

 

This policy applies to stock options granted by Theravance, Inc. (the “Company”) to its non-employee directors who resign from the Company’s board of directors in connection with the Company’s spin-off of Theravance Biopharma, Inc. (“Biopharma”) and who continue to serve as non-employee members of the board of directors of Biopharma (each, a “Biopharma Director”) to the extent such options are outstanding immediately prior to the spin-off (“Eligible Theravance Options”).

 

Following the spin-off, the continued service by a former non-employee director of the Company as a Biopharma Director will constitute “service” for all purposes of the Biopharma Director’s Eligible Theravance Options, other than with respect to the vesting of such stock options.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)




(Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such
officer's knowledge, that:




The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 of the Company fully complies, in all material respects, with
the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, and the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      November 9, 2009
                                        By:
                                        /s/ Zishen
      WuZishen
      WuPresident
      and CEODated:
      November 9, 2009
                                        By:
                                        /s/
      Sam
      YuSam
      YuChief
      Financial
Officer
NOTIFICATION TO OPM OF SEPARATION OF A REEMPLOYED ANNUITANT- NO BENEFITS PAYABLE

NAME: DOB: SSN: 

Claim Number:

DATE OF SEPARATION ______________________________________

Does this annuitant have a disability retirement? ______Yes ______No

REEMPLOYED ANNUITANT WAS UNDER A DUAL COMPENSATION WAIVER. PLEASE RESTORE 

FEHB _______ FEGLI_________

REEMPLOYED ANNUITANT SEPARATED PRIOR TO ATTAINING ONE FULL YEAR OF SERVICE. 

PLEASE RESTORE

FEHB ________ FEGLI ____________

APPLICATION FOR REFUND OF EMPLOYEE DEDUCTIONS WILL BE SUBMITTED

SEPARATION SF 50 IS ATTACHED

AGENCY EMAIL ADDRESS___________________________ AGENCY PHONE #________________

AGENCY OFFICIAL SIGNATURE ___________________________ DATE ________________________
Exhibit 33.2



MANAGEMENT’S
ASSERTION OF COMPLIANCE



Management of the Agency
and Trust division of Citibank, N.A. (or “Company”) is responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing
criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Management has determined
that the servicing criteria in Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB are applicable in regard to the servicing platform as of and for the
period as follows:



Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and
certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant to contractual obligation) automobile
loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006, for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”)



Applicable
Servicing Criteria: All servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d), to the extent required by Item 1122(d) servicing criteria
in regards to the activities performed by the Company with respect to the Platform as to any transaction, except for the following
criteria: 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i) and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv),
which management has determined are not applicable to the activities the Company performs with respect to the Platform (the “Applicable
Servicing Criteria”).



Period:
Twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the “Period”).



With respect to the
Platform as of and for the Period, the Company’s management provides the following assertion of compliance with respect to
the Applicable Servicing Criteria:



| | · | The Company’s management is responsible for assessing the Company’s compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | The Company’s management has assessed compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria. In making this assessment, management
used the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | Based on such assessment, the Company has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.
| | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



KPMG LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report with respect to management’s assertion of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.



CITIBANK,
N.A.



By: /s/
Karen Montbach

Its: Managing
Director

Dated: February
28, 2013
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30530 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus DISCOVERY ALUMINAS, INC., Defendant, JOHN/JANE DOE, Movant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana

USDC No. 00-CR-151-ALL

-------------------- July 22, 2002 Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John/Jane Doe appeals the denial of a motion to intervene in the criminal proceedings under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2) of the Federal Water Pollution Act, i.e. , the Clean Water Act, against Discovery Aluminas, Inc. (“Discovery”). Doe sought to assert, under 33 U.S.C. § 411 , a right to one-half of the fine levied against Discovery.No. 01-30530 -2- Doe has abandoned the contract claim raised in the district
court. Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Doe contends that the Government’s prosecution of Discovery under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2) was essentially a prosecution under 33 U.S.C. § 407 and that 33 U.S.C. § 407 is a lesser-included offense of 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2). Doe asserts that he met the requirements of F ED . R. C IV . P. 24(a)(2) for intervention. Discovery was convicted of a violation of the Clean Water Act. The Clean Water Act does not contain a provision that would entitle Doe to share in the fine that was assessed against Discovery. A right to a portion of a fine assessed for a violation of 33 U.S.C. § 407 arises following a conviction obtained by the United States under that statute. See 33 U.S.C. § 413. The power to conduct litigation in which the United States is a party is discretionary and is generally not reviewable by the courts. Dresser Indus. v. United States , 596 F.2d 1231, 1237 (5th Cir. 1979). Doe has not shown that he had the right to intervene in this criminal proceeding, nor has he shown that a conviction under 33 U.S.C. § 1319(c)(2) is equivalent to a conviction under 33 U.S.C. § 407. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is
AFFIRMED.
[No. 24863-8-II.

Division Two.

October 20, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Marleen A. Harnishfeger, *Respondent*and Frederick H. Harnishfeger, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 99-3-01029-8, Arthur W. Verharen, J., entered June 11, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Armstrong, C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
**Exhibit 11****Certifications**I, Phil E. Mulacek, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of InterOil Corporation (the ***“issuer”***); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuer’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the issuer’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the period covered by this annual report that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the issuer’s auditors and theaudit committee of the issuer’s board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: October 29, 2007         /s/ Phil E. Mulacek   Phil E. Mulacek   Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350,**

**as adopted pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), Gregory S. Martin, asChief Financial Officer of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 9, 2009 | /s/ GREGORY S. MARTIN            |
|------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                         |                             |
|                         | Name: Gregory S. Martin          |
|                         | Title: *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

1

----
# Official Journal L 262/7 Au

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 262 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 477 August 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 262

English edition

Legislation

Volume 477 August 2004

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/2004 of 6 August 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1424/2004 of 6 August 2004 fixing quantities for importing bananas into the Community under the tariff quotas A/B and C for the fourth quarter of 2004 | 3 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1425/2004 of 6 August 2004 fixing the A1 and B export refunds for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes and apples) | 5 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1423/2004 of 6 August 2004 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1424/2004 of 6 August 2004 fixing quantities for importing bananas into the Community under the tariff quotas A/B and C for the fourth quarter of 2004

3

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1425/2004 of 6 August 2004 fixing the A1 and B export refunds for fruit and vegetables (tomatoes, oranges, table grapes and apples)

5

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### PITTMAN v. STATE.

No. 19765.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1938.

Fred O. Jaye, of DeLeon, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for five days.

Article 802, P.C., as amended by chapter 424, Acts of the First Called Session of the 44th Legislature, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 802, denouncing the offense of driving an automobile or motor vehicle upon any public highway, etc., while intoxicated, was amended by House Bill No. 120, Acts of the Regular Session of the 45th Legislature, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 802, under a caption reading as follows: “An Act amending article 802, Penal Code of Texas, 1925, as amended by Chapter 424, Acts of the First Called Session, Forty-fourth Legislature, and declaring an emergency.”

The title to the act does not specify the particular field the amendment covers. It merely specifies the article in the Penal Code to be amended. The provisions of the amendatory act are germane to the subject of article 802, P.C. Generally, a reference to a number of an article in a code, such as our revised statutes, is sufficient in the title *1081of an act amendatory thereof, to allow any amendment germane to the subject treated in the article referred to. We are unable to agree with appellant’s contention that the caption is insufficient to meet the requirements of section 35, article 3 of the Constitution. See C. D. Walker v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 116 S.W.2d 1076, this day delivered, and authorities cited.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
##### 



1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
   /s/ Bruce L. Bisson

Bruce L. BissonVice PresidentWilmington Trust Company
##### 



News
For Immediate Release
    
    (elpaso LOGO)
 El Paso Corporation Announces Acquisition of Peoples Energy Production Company
 HOUSTON, TEXAS, August 17, 2007
 Key Facts:
  
    
    42% proved developed producing
    
    94% natural gas
    
    Current production: 72 MMcfe/d
    Acquisition Rationale:
 
    
    Excellent fit with current El Paso E&P operations
    
    Provides significant drilling inventory in current areas of operations
    
    Lengthens reserve life
    
    Adds talented staff
    
    Continues previously announced E&P portfolio high-grading process
  1




---



##### 



Financing Plan
   Webcast Notice
   2




---



##### 



(800) 642-1687 (713) 420-2903.
  Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
  Contacts  Investor and Public Relations
 Media Relations
 3
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Raymond Irvine, President, Secretary and
Treasurer of Teckmine Industries, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Teckmine Industries,
      Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Teckmine Industries, Inc.                                                                



Dated: August 16, 2010



| | /s/
      Raymond Irvine                                                                         
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Raymond Irvine                                                                                   
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director                                                     
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Teckmine
Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Teckmine Industries, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3149 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3149

To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a limit on checked 
       baggage fees imposed by air carriers on passengers in air 
                transportation, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2015

   Mr. Mica introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
             Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 49, United States Code, to establish a limit on checked 
       baggage fees imposed by air carriers on passengers in air 
                transportation, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Baggage Fee Fairness Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON CHECKED BAGGAGE FEES.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter I of chapter 417 of title 49, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 41725. Limitation on checked baggage fees
    ``Beginning on the 180th day following the date of enactment of 
this section, an air carrier or foreign air carrier may not collect 
from a passenger a fee for an item of checked baggage on a flight in 
passenger air transportation if the amount of the fee exceeds the total 
amount of passenger facility charges that could be imposed (without 
regard to whether the charges are actually imposed) on the passenger by 
eligible agencies for boardings associated with that flight under 
paragraphs (1) and (4) of section 40117(b).''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The analysis for such chapter is amended 
by inserting after the item relating to section 41724 the following:

``41725. Limitation on checked baggage fees.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 11, 2022 No. 04-20-00151-CV John PORTERFIELD , Appellant

v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY ,

Appellee From the 451st Judicial District Court, Kendall County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-366 Honorable Kirsten Cohoon, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice Irene Rios, Justice

Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice Appellee’s motion for en banc reconsideration is DENIED. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 49.5. Appellee’s request for oral argument is also DENIED.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins, Justice IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 11th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court