alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3645 

To amend the Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamp Act to 

give the Secretary of the Interior, with the approval of the Migratory 

Bird Conservation Commission, the authority to periodically increase 

the price of Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamps to account 

for inflation in funding the acquisition of interests in land for the 

conservation of migratory birds, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 

Mr. LOWENTHAL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation 

Stamp Act to give the Secretary of the Interior, with 

the approval of the Migratory Bird Conservation Commission, the authority to periodically increase the price 

of Migratory Bird Hunting and Conservation Stamps 

to account for inflation in funding the acquisition of 

interests in land for the conservation of migratory birds, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3645 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Duck Stamp 

3 Price Stability Act of 2015’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PERIODIC INCREASE IN PRICE OF MIGRATORY 

5 BIRD HUNTING AND CONSERVATION STAMP 

6 TO ACCOUNT FOR INFLATION. 

7 Section 2 of the Migratory Bird Hunting and Con8 servation Stamp Act (16 U.S.C. 718b) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (b), by striking ‘‘The Postal’’ 

10 and inserting ‘‘Except as provided in subsections (c) 

11 and (d), the Postal’’; and 

12 (2) by adding at the end of the following: 

13 ‘‘(d) INCREASE IN PRICE OF STAMP.— 

14 ‘‘(1) INCREASE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary 

15 may, after notice and public comment, increase the 

16 price of each stamp sold under this section by an 

17 amount not to exceed $10 for a hunting year if the 

18 Secretary determines the increase— 

19 ‘‘(A) is commensurate with the level of in20 flation as determined by the adjustments in the 

21 Consumer Price Index since the last increase; 

22 and 

23 ‘‘(B) is approved unanimously by the Mi24 gratory Bird Conservation Commission. 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3645 IH

1 ‘‘(2) EFFECTIVE DATE OF INCREASE.—An in2 crease in price under paragraph (1) shall take ef3 fect— 

4 ‘‘(A) no earlier than 2 years after the ef5 fective date of the last increase in price; and 

6 ‘‘(B) no later than January 1 of the cal7 endar year preceding the hunting year.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK9F6TC42PROD with BILLS
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS 

No. 16-1028V 

Filed: November 23, 2016 

UNPUBLISHED 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

TURMAK DAVIS, * 

 * 

 Petitioner, * Ruling on Entitlement; Concession; 

v. * Influenza (“Flu”); Shoulder Injury 

 * Related to Vaccine Administration 

SECRETARY OF HEALTH * (“SIRVA”); 

AND HUMAN SERVICES, * Special Processing Unit (“SPU”) 

 * 

 Respondent. * 

 * 

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 

Leah Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, Washington, DC, for petitioner. 

Debra Begley, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent. 

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master: 

 On August 19, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the 

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,

2 (the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that he suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 3, 

2015. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special Processing Unit of the Office 

of Special Masters. 

On November 22, 2016, respondent filed her Rule 4(c) report in which she 

concedes that petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 

4(c) Report at 1. Specifically, respondent concluded that petitioner’s alleged injury is 

consistent with a SIRVA, and was caused in fact by the flu vaccine he received on 

November 3, 2015 Id. at 3. Respondent further agrees that petitioner has met the 

statutory requirements for entitlement to compensation. Id.

 

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the 

undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with 

the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of 

Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to 

identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an 

unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits 

within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for 

ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012). 
2

 In view of respondent’s concession and the evidence before me, the 

undersigned finds that petitioner is entitled to compensation. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Nora Beth Dorsey 

 Chief Special Master
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-18-00022-CR

JASON EUGENE ARNOLD, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 396th District Court

of Tarrant County (1424463D)

January 10, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment 

of the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Exhibit
32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. Section 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
   In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TC Power Management Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Nigel Johnson, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary,
and Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
  (1)
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  (2)
              The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.
  A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TC Power Management Corp., and will be retained by TC Power Management Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
   Dated
this 21st day of January, 2009.
  /s/ Nigel Johnson
 Nigel
Johnson
 Chief
Financial Officer, Principal
 Accounting
Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer




12
### Ap **pendix II -**  **Outstanding Data For EPA**  **Registration No s**  **. 47000**  **- 19**  **, 47000 -** **101**
**Outstanding Product**  **Chemistry for**  **47000 -**  **19** 830.1550 Product identity a n d composition 830.1600 Description of materials used to produce the product 830.1650 Description of formulati on process 830.1670 Discussion of formation of im p urities 830

. 1750 Certified l imits 830

. 1800 Enforcement analytical method 830.6302 Color 830.6303 Physical state 830.6304 Odor 830.6314 Oxidizing or reducing action 830.6315 F l ammabi l ity 830.6316 Explodability 830.63 1 7 Storage stability 830

. 6319 Miscibility 830

. 6320 Corrosion characteristics 830

. 6321 Dielectric breakdown vo l tage 830.7000 pH 830.7100 Viscosity 830.7300 Density/relative density **Outstanding Product**  **Chemistry for 47000**  **- 101**  830.63 1 7 Storage stability 830

. 6320 Corrosion characteristics
### IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10
- 16
- 00165
- CR ALBERT DAWSON, JR. , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 77th District Court Limestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 13561
- A

_____________ No. 10
- 16
- 00172
- CR ALBERT DAWSON, JR. , Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

From the 2 nd 25 th District Court Colorado County, Texas Trial Court No. CR15
- 067Dawson v. State Page 2 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION
Albert Dawson Jr. seeks to appeal the trial court’s denial of his pro se post

conviction motion to reduce his illegal sentences in these two cases. Dawson’s letter, which is being treated as a notice of appeal, 1 states that the trial court denied Dawson’s motion to reduce his illegal sentence in both cases.
Cause No. 13561
- A: This case is from the 7 7th District Court in Limestone County. We do not have jurisdiction of a direct appeal of the trial court’s denial of a post

conviction motion to reduce an illegal sentence. See Abbott v. State , 271 S.W.3d 694 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) ( stating that standard for determining jurisdiction is not whether appeal is precluded by law, but whether appeal is authorized by law); Everett v. State, 91 S.W.3d 386, 386 (Tex. App.

— Waco 2002, no pet.) (stating that court has jurisdiction over criminal appeals only when expressly granted by law). No law authorizes such a direct appeal. Cf. Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 512

- 13 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (defendant may raise challenge to illegal sentence for first time on habeas corpus review). Accordingly, the appeal of the trial court’s denial of Dawson’s motion to reduce his illegal sentence in
Cause No. 13561

- A is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Cause No. CR
- 15
- 067: This case is from the 2nd 25th District Court in Colorado County. We do not have territorial jurisdiction of an appeal from Colorado County, which is within the territorial jurisdiction of the First Court of Appeals. See T EX

. G OV ’ T

.

1 A defendant’s letter that demonstrates a desire to appeal is sufficient to serve as a notice of appeal. See Palma v. State, 76 S.W.3d 638, 641

- 42 (Tex. App.

— Corpus Christi 2002, pet. ref’d) ; see also Pharris v. State, 196 S.W.3d 369, 372 (Tex. App.

— Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).Dawson v. State Page 3

C ODE A NN

. §§ 22.220 (a), 22.201(b, k) (West Supp. 2015) . Accordingly, the appeal of the trial court’s denial of Dawson’s motion to reduce his illegal sentence in Cause No. CR

- 15

- 067 is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

REX D. DAVIS Justice Before Chief Justice Gray, J ustice Davis, and Justice Scoggins Dismissed Opi nion delivered and filed June 2 , 2016 Do n o t p ublish [CR25]
SHARE

# Tyler Owens

              -  Fact Sheets 
              -  Timeline of ORNL Science 
              -  Leadership Team 
              -  Interactive Map 
              -  Diversity 
              -  Organization 
              -  Who we are, aren't 
              -  Community Engagement 
              -  History 
              -  Honors and Awards 
              -  Environmental Protection 
              -  Quality (ISO9001) 
              -  Research Integrity 
              -  Working at ORNL 

Tyler Owens

## Federal Affairs Director

Tyler Owens is federal affairs director at Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL). In this role, he serves as ORNL’s senior representative and chief liaison to government officials, industry, think tanks, and university representatives in Washington, D.C. He provides guidance to the laboratory director to develop and execute strategies that best position ORNL in the evolving federal policy environment. He is also responsible for presenting ORNL’s priorities to Congress, the administration, and federal agencies.

Tyler has more than 20 years of experience at federal, state, and local government levels, most recently serving as a senior staff member in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate, including more than a decade on the Senate Committee on Appropriations. He served in 2002 as full committee staff on the House Committee on Natural Resources, handling natural resources, public lands, energy, and endangered species issues. He joined the staff of U.S. Senator Robert F. Bennett in 2006 as counsel, later becoming senior counsel over agriculture, energy, environment, natural resources, judiciary, and related appropriations. In 2009, Tyler joined the Senate Appropriations Committee's Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development as professional staff and was named Republican clerk in 2015. In November 2021, Tyler joined ORNL as the federal affairs director. Tyler graduated magna cum laude from Utah State University in 2001 with a bachelor of arts in political science and received a juris doctor from George Mason University School of Law in 2005. He is a member of the Virginia State Bar.
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Schuster, principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company (the
Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|/s/ James E. Schuster                     
|James E. Schuster, Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)             

May 7, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 27, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

136043 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 136043 

 COA: 273483 

Chippewa CC: 06-008205-FH

ROBERT LEE BAILEY,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 29, 2008 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0519 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 27, 2008 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Fairway Group Holdings Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Herbert Ruetsch, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/   Herbert Ruetsch     |   |
|---------------------------|--------|
| Herbert   Ruetsch         |   |
| Chief   Executive Officer |
| June 6,   2013       |

 

A signed copy of this original statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff on request.

 

----
#### LINTHICUM v. STATE.

No. 18153.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1936.

*447D. L. Harry, of Jacksonville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of whisky for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Pending appeal, the law under which appellant was convicted has been repealed.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
# )DRAFT Clothes Washer Rulemakings Schedule
Feb Mr AprMay Jn Jly AugSep Oct Nov Dec Jn Feb Mr Apr May Jn Jly Aug Sep Oct NovDec Jan Feb Mr Apr May Jn Jly Aug Sep Oct ,'9,7 '9_7_'97 'I9 '97 97 '97 '97 '97 '97 '97 '98 '98 '98 '98 '98 9 98 '98 '98 '98 '98 '98 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 '99 Test Procedures Draft Final Rule Approve Final Rule Issue Final Rule , Federal Register Proof 'Publish Final Rule Standards Rulemaking Framework Stakeholder Review, DOE discussion wA Stakeholders

__ _ Noticeof Workshop Comment Period Rulcmaking Framcwink W.S.

_ _ _

- Data Collection Eng. AnalJLCC/Cand. Std. Lev.

__ __ Prcl. National Forecasting Ifdata avail. Cash Flow Anal. Notice ofAvailability Comment Period Draft ANOPR I I li Approval ofANOPR PublishANOPR Comment Period 

### WorkshoT 41 Revise ANOPR Analyses Consumcr Subgroup Aalysis' Manufacturer Impact Analysis Utility/Envunsntal Analyses

__ __ Notice ofA Anvailability Commse"t Period
Drftt NOPR DOJ& OMB Review *Approval or NOPR Issue NOPR
Comment Period d&Heng... 

## Rev.Cmnts ReviseAnal.I Stakeholdne 

# Review 

# I
Final Rule Doaft/Approval OMBSRevh d 

### &Approval i Publsh FusalRu

DOI consultition andOMB review and approval.

_I
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Purden Lake Resource Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Lisa Lopomo, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
13th day of February, 2008.


/s/ Lisa Lopomo
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
ern® Inventory Expert Service 

A division of the Ame rican Chemical Society Phone: 800-631 - 1884, 614-447-3870 

Fax: 614-447-3747 

E-mail: answers@cas.org 

Web: www.cas.org/products/client/ 

INVENTORY EXPERT SERVICE REPORT 

IES- ORDEII. NUl1BER: 200622 

REGI STRY NUMBER: 

Please print the above CA Index Name on the appropriate page of your PMN. 

0 

CAS 

If this box is checked, CAS has made correction{s) marked in red to 

your IES order. Please make the same correction{s) to your PMN before 

submitting it to the EPA. 

2540 O lentangy River Road P.O. Box 3343 Columbus, O hio 43210-0334 USA
From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: "Frey Nathan J." <Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov> Cc: "Mancini Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Peter

Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ Wa yland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/25/2 012 11:11 PM Subject: Updated preamble



### Nathan,

After further discussions this afternoon, Gina instructed us to provide you a copy of the preamble in which we addressed your comments consistent with the discussion that she had with Cass yesterday.
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





The
undersigned, Patrick Giordano, the President, Chief Executive Officer,
Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Director of E Global Marketing, Inc. (the
“Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes
of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the
Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:
      May 13, 2009By:
            /s/Patrick
      GiordanoName:
            Patrick
      GiordanoTitle:
            President,
      Chief Executive Officer,Treasurer,
      Chief Financial Officer andDirector
      (Principal Executive, Financialand
      Accounting Officer)





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### HENDERSON v. STATE.

No. 18103.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 25, 1936.

W. V. Geppert and E. R. Simmons, both of Teague, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for unlawful possession of a still for the manufacture of spirituous liquor ; punishment being assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

Since the conviction in this case the law under which the prosecution proceeded has been repealed. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
THIS PLACE-HOLDER PAGE REPLACES THE

THERMAL GRAVIMETRIC ANALYSIS CLAIMED CBI

(1 PAGE)
Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Subject: Kanani Adolpho <kadolpho@hawaii.edu> Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:26 PM EAS (OST) Department oftransportation I am writing to supportMokulele airlines 4 year bidto link Kalaupapato Kahului, Honolulu, kapalua, and Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent flights, multiple islands and ease ofbooking via Global Distributions system ( Expedia,Travelosity, Orbitz, Priceline ect.) Itis importantwe have safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa. Please selectMokulele to serve Kalaupapafor 4 years. Aloha, kanani Adolpho

1