alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-SN1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 17764.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Jesse Owens, of Vernon, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for selling whisky; punishment being three years in the penitentiary.

Pending appeal, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which conviction was had has been repealed. See Acts 44th Leg., 2d C.S., § 49, article 1 of the Liquor Control Act (Vernon’s Ann. P.C. art. 666 — 49), and Guy Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481, opinion of this date.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed July 26, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals 

NO. 14-11-01029-CR

MAXIMO GARZA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 262nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1288955

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury convicted appellant of possession of a controlled substance greater than 400 

grams, namely cocaine, and sentenced him to confinement for thirty-five years in the 
2

Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a 

notice of appeal.

Appellant’s appointed counsel filed a brief in which she concludes the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirement of Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), by advancing contentions which might 

arguably support the appeal. See Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1969); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); and Currie v. State, 

516 S.W.2d 684 Tex. Crim. App. 1974). 

A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant. Appellant was advised of 

the right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response. See Stafford v. State, 

813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App.1991). As of this date, no pro se response 

has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree the appeal is 

wholly frivolous and without merit. Further, we find no reversible error in the record. 

We are not to address the merits of each claim raised in an Anders brief or a pro se 

response when we have determined there are no arguable grounds for review. See 

Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 827–28 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Boyce, Christopher, and Jamison.

Do Not Publish — Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).
United States Office of Personnel Management

Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 24-301 Date: December 2023

Subject: Calendar Year 2024 Interest Rate

The U.S. Treasury has announced the calendar year 2024 interest rate is 3.750 percent. 

This rate is applicable to “post-1956” military service credit accounts. The U.S. Office of 

Personnel Management (OPM) will apply this rate to civilian service credit and 

voluntary contribution accounts.

Employing agencies must assess interest on the unpaid balance in post-1956 military 

service credit accounts on an employee’s “interest accrual date” (IAD), and interest is 

compounded annually.

The actual interest rate applied is a “composite” rate, based on the rates in effect during 

the 12-month period preceding the IAD. Thus, it has components of both the current 

and previous year’s interest rates.

Chapter 23 of the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) and Federal Employees 

Retirement System (FERS) Handbook for Personnel and Payroll Offices contains 

guidance for computing interest on military service credit deposits, including the 

determination of the IAD and the formula for composite interest rates.

To reduce the unpaid balance in a military service credit account prior to the 

assessment of additional interest, a remittance must be received on time. To be 

considered timely, remittances must be physically in the possession of the agency 

official authorized to receive them by the close of business on the last business day
Benefits Administration Letter 24-301

2 

before the IAD. Thus, for deposits sent by mail, the date on the postmark does not 

constitute the date of remittance.

If you have questions about this letter, please send an email to 

FinancialBALs@opm.gov or call 202-606-0606. We look forward to assisting you.
Exhibit 33.7



|     |  |                                                               
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | 303 E Wacker Drive, Suite 900
Chicago, IL 60601 (312)
233-6440

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONS REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2014, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank(the
Servicer).

National Tax Search, LLC (NTS) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2014 and for the period
from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR). NTS has used the
servicing criteria communicated to NTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (1)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii),
1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) are applicable to the activities NTS performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined that the remaining servicing criteria set
forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax payments made on behalf of
the Servicer using NTSs TaxQ system (the Platform Transactions).

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable
Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform
Transactions taken as a whole.

Plante & Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the
assessment of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2014 and for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

|                            
|----------------------------
|                            
|/s/ Lori D. Eshoo           
|Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
|January 12, 2015
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

1341 

CA 15-00298 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., SMITH, VALENTINO, WHALEN, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

MARY DELUCA, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS 

CLASS REPRESENTATIVE, ET AL., 

PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, 

 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TONAWANDA COKE CORPORATION, ESTATE OF 

J.D. CRANE, DECEASED, MARK KAMHOLZ, 

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, 

ET AL., DEFENDANTS. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

HODGSON RUSS LLP, BUFFALO (HUGH M. RUSS, III, OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS. 

WILENTZ, GOLDMAN & SPITZER, P.A., NEW YORK CITY (ALFRED M. ANTHONY OF

COUNSEL), COLLINS & COLLINS ATTORNEYS, LLC, BUFFALO, GORDON & GORDON,

SPRINGFIELD, NEW JERSEY, AND HOBBIE, CORRIGAN & BERTUCIO, P.C.,

EATONTOWN, NEW JERSEY, FOR PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS.

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L.

Feroleto, J.), entered January 7, 2015. The order, inter alia,

granted in part the motion of plaintiffs for class certification. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in DeLuca v Tonawanda Coke Corp. ([appeal No.

1] ___ AD3d ___ [Dec. 31, 2015]).

Entered: December 31, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Cutbirth, James W. <James.Cutbirth@GAPAC.com>

Sent: Monday, April 01, 2013 11:58 AM

To: 'PETTYJOHN@adeq.state.ar.us'

Cc: 'Davis, Anthony (DavisA@adeq.state.ar.us)'; 'mac@adeq.state.ar.us'; 'spencer@adeq.state.ar.us'; Medina, 

Dayana; Donaldson, Guy; Nann, Barbara; Feldman, Michael; Kordzi, Joe

Subject: Georgia-Pacific Responses to ADEQ and EPA Region 6 BART Questions for Crossett Paper Operations, 

Crossett AR

Attachments: BART Response to ADEQ and EPA Region 6 04-01-2013.pdf; FW: Region 6 feedback on Georgia Pacific6A and 9A boilers; FW: Georgia Pacific; Table 1-Baseline 2001 2002 2003 BART Analyses 3-27-2013.xls; 

BART Five Factor Analysis Response 05-18-2012.pdf

Mary and all other personnel at ADEQ and EPA Region 6:

Please find enclosed Georgia‐Pacific’s written responses to the questions and issues related to BART compliance for the

Crossett Paper Operations facility in Crossett AR that were discussed during our teleconference call on March 20,

2013.  Enclosed with this submittal are the following attachments:

 Letter from Georgia‐Pacific to Mary Pettyjohn at ADEQ, dated April 1, 2013,  transmitting written

responses related to BART compliance for the Crossett Paper Operations

 E‐mail correspondence between Dayana Medina and Mary Pettyjohn, dated February 06, 2013 for Boiler

9A

 E‐mail correspondence between Dayana Medina and Mary Pettyjohn, dated March 4, 2013 for Boiler 6A

 Table 1‐Baseline Years (2001‐2002‐2003) BART Emission Calculations and Explanation fo How 24‐hour

Maximum Emission Rates Were Determined for BART Analyses

 Correspondence Letter between Georgia‐Pacific and ADEQ, dated May 18, 2012, with results of CALPUFF

Modeling for 6A Boiler and 9A Boiler

Sincerely,

Jim Cutbirth 

Jim Cutbirth

Environmental Manager

Georgia Pacific LLC

Crossett Consumer Products Mill

(870)567‐8144
II

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION S. 2693

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide a more equitable

Federal medical assistance percentage for Alaska.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JUNE 8, 2000

Mr. MURKOWSKI (for himself and Mr. STEVENS) introduced the following bill;

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

A BILL

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide

a more equitable Federal medical assistance percentage

for Alaska.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alaska Medicaid Eq5 uity Act of 2000’’.

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE SOCIAL SECURITY ACT.

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The first sentence of section

8 1905(b) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(b))

9 is amended—
2

•S 2693 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and (3)’’ and inserting ‘‘(3)’’;

2 and

3 (2) by striking the period and inserting ‘‘, and

4 (4) for purposes of this title and title XXI, with re5 spect to Alaska, the State percentage used to deter6 mine the Federal medical assistance percentage shall

7 be that percentage which bears the same ratio to 45

8 percent as the square of the adjusted per capita in9 come of Alaska (determined by dividing the State’s

10 3-year average per capita income by 1.25) bears to

11 the square of the per capita income of the 50

12 States.’’.

13 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by

14 subsection (a) take effect October 1, 2000.

Æ
Featured           Three ORNL IP projects advance toward Lab MATCH Prize         

Featured           Riding through: Researchers enhance reliability of electric vehicle charging          

Featured           ORNL helping Roll-to-Roll Consortium scale up hydrogen technology         

# About | Electrification and Energy Infrastructures

### Contact

PhilipBingham

binghampr@ornl.gov

##  

## Developing innovative capabilities for electric energy devices and systems

The Electrification and Energy Infrastructures Division, or EEID, is targeting breakthroughs to improve the reliability, sustainability, and efficiencies of energy storage systems, electric grid protections and controls, and advancements in power electronics. The division comprises internationally recognized staff who possess expertise encompassing nearly all areas of applied science and engineering.

The Electrification and Energy Infrastructures Division utilizes the resources of the Grid Research Integration and Deployment Center (GRID-C) at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. The 52,000 sq. ft GRID-C facility is a national showcase for energy systems research and development. By co-locating R&D in energy storage, power and energy systems, power electronics, sensors and controls, data science and modeling, and cybersecurity, GRID-C enables breakthroughs to support a resilient and secure power grid

The unique, multipurpose research environment at GRID-C is available to industry, academic, and government partners who wish to access its state-of-the-art capabilities and world-class expertise to mutually develop innovative technologies for grid security, resilience, and reliability.

Fact Sheet
Grid Research Integration and Deployment Center

## Facilities

View a hi-res version of this image

Grid Research Integration and Deployment Center

View a hi-res version of this image

National Transportation Research Center 

View a hi-res version of this image

### Building Technologies Research and Integration Center

https://www.ornl.gov/facility/btric

View a hi-res version of this image

### Carbon Fiber Technology Facility

https://www.ornl.gov/facility/cftf

View a hi-res version of this image

### Manufacturing Demonstration Facility

https://www.ornl.gov/facility/mdf

## Related Videos

#### 

#### 

#### 

## Current Research

## News

Three ORNL IP projects advance toward Lab MATCH Prize

## News

Riding through: Researchers enhance reliability of electric vehicle charging 

## News

ORNL helping Roll-to-Roll Consortium scale up hydrogen technology

## News

More than flying cars: eVTOL battery analysis reveals unique operating demands
YOU’RE THROWINGAWAY CASH 

FROM YOUR PAYCHECK IF YOU DON’T

HAVE AN FSA! WHAT A WASTE.

Get the Fed-friendly tax break on your health care expenses.

Enroll in FSAFEDS during Open Season, 

November 9 to December 14, 2015 at www.FSAFEDS.com.

PUT MORE MONEY IN YOUR POCKET!

1-877-FSAFEDS (372-3337) | TTY: 1-800-952-0450
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Brad Bernstein, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ **BRAD
                BERNSTEIN****Brad
                Bernstein,****President
                and Chief Financial Officer****November
                19, 2007**
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 17199.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 2, 1935.

*679B. W. Baker, of Carthage, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Omitting the formal parts, we quote the indictment as follows; “On or about the 26th day of October, A. D. 1933, and anterior to the presentment of this indictment, in the county and state aforesaid, Earnest Williams and Marvin Smith, did then and there unlawfully possess, and have in their possession for the purpose of sale, liquors capable of producing intoxication.”

The indictment is fundamentally defective for the reasons stated in Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 10-305 Date: August 2010 

Subject: September 2010 Headcount 

This is a reminder for you to submit your semiannual Headcount for the September 2010 

reporting period. 

The Headcount is reported semiannually (March and September) by all payroll providers that 

withhold monies from salaries for participants in the Civil Service Retirement System, Federal 

Employees Retirement System, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and Federal 

Employee Group Life Insurance Programs. 

The September 2010 Headcount will be for payroll paid during the FIRST 15 DAYS of 

September. For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period will be August 2010. The Headcount 

report must be submitted no later than September 20, 2010. We ask that you notify us if you 

anticipate a delay or any difficulties in submitting it by this date. Under no circumstances should 

you delay transmitting your normal Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) report 

because your Headcount is not ready to be submitted. 

Please FAX (using CLEAR, legible originals) your OPM Forms 1523 and SF 2812-A to us at 

202-606-0701. If you prefer, you may email your forms to Donna.Deemer@opm.gov or 

Yadira.Vega@opm.gov. In addition, please mail the original forms to: U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management, Funds Management, P.O. Box 7125, Washington, DC 20415. If you have 

questions concerning the preparation of your Headcount report, please call Ms. Deemer or Ms. 

Vega in the Funds Management Section at 202-606-2026 and 202-606-4842 respectively. 

. 

 

Patricia A. Cappello 

Acting Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
RRMS 06.30.14 EXHIBIT 10.2




EXHIBIT 10.2




ROSE ROCK MIDSTREAM GP, LLC


Board of Directors
Compensation Plan
Effective December 1, 2014




Total annual compensation for the non-executive Board members of Rose Rock Midstream GP, LLC will be paid both in a cash retainer and in equity of Rose Rock Midstream, L.P.


	
				
	 
	Total Compensation 1
	Annual Cash Retainer 
	Annual Equity Grant 2

	Members - Board Only
	$150,000
	$75,000
	$75,000

	Chairman - Audit Committee
	$165,000
	$90,000
	$75,000

	Chairman - Conflicts Committee
	$162,500
	$87,500
	$75,000






		
	A.
	Board members will receive equity as restricted units which shall fully vest on the first anniversary date of the grant.


		
	B.
	Board members must retain 100% of all units awarded under this plan until a minimum ownership level of vested units equal in value to 4x’s the Annual Cash Retainer for Members - Board Only as set forth above has been achieved; provided,  however, (i) that Board members will be able to sell units to cover tax liability associated with vesting of restricted units and (ii) that vested units can be transferred: (1) to his or her revocable grantor trust in which such Director is the sole primary beneficiary; (2) to a trust maintained for the benefit of the spouse or minor child of the Director of which the Director serves as trustee; and (3) to the spouse of the director to be held in common ownership with such Director.


		
	C.
	Each Board member shall receive the highest Total Compensation he or she is entitled to pursuant to the above table.  No Board member shall be entitled to compensation from more than one row of the table set forth above.


		
	D.
	The number of restricted units received shall be determined by dividing the dollar amount of the grant by the value of a common unit on the date the grant is made.


		
	E.
	Board members will receive their annual cash compensation and equity awards in advance for each plan year, which shall commence on (December 1) of each year.  Cash compensation and equity awards shall be pro-rated for any Director whose service commences after (December 1).




1  Total compensation is the sum of the cash and equity retainers paid on an annual basis.  
2  All equity grants will be made under the Rose Rock Midstream Equity Incentive Plan.