alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 97-413 Date: December 11, 1997 

Subject: 1997 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Open Season: Blue

Cross Blue Shield Service benefit Plan - Change of Preferred Providers in Northeastern

Pennsylvania

We have been informed that Blue Cross of Northeastern Pennsylvania, which administers the Blue

Cross Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan (Code 10) in the Wilkes-Barre, PA, area, just announced

to its enrollees that it has changed its Preferred Provider hospital network for 1998. 

While we do not know how significant these changes may be -- we understand there are still

plenty of hospitals available -- we do know that the notice was distributed too late for many

employees to make an informed decision about the Service Benefit Plan before this year's open

season ended on December 8. In view of this, please remind your employing offices in the

Wilkes-Barre area that they have the authority to accept belated open season changes in individual

cases. This is an occasion that warrants the approval of belated changes, and we encourage you

to urge your installations in the area to do so.

Please bring this matter to the attention of your local installations as quickly as possible. 

 Abby L. Block, Chief

 Insurance Policy

 and Information Division
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)




(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      May 11, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Zishen WuZishen
      WuPresident
      and CEODated:
      May 11, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Sam YuSam
      YuChief
      Financial Officer
#### In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Kitty Wolf, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

May 27, 1958.

*937
      *Bower & O’Covmior*for Peter P. Hollway, as administrator *c. t. a.,*petitioner.

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The propounded writing is a holograph signed at the end by the testatrix and attested by two witnesses. The attestations took place in two separate rooms of the same house. One witness, Elias Slap, testified to a valid execution. He added that he then took the will to the room occupied by the other witness, Alice Kludjian. She testified that he presented the instrument to her, said it was the last will and testament of the decedent, that he had already witnessed its execution, and that the decedent requested that she act as the second witness. She testified, however, that the testatrix was not present, nor had she ever published the instrument as her will or requested her to sign, but that later in the evening the testatrix thanked her for having acted as a witness. The testimony of the witness Slap in this regard is to the effect that while his recollection is hazy on the subject, he was not in a position to testify that the testatrix did not publish the instrument to Alice Kludjian or request her to sign, and that as far as his recollection was concerned the testatrix might very well have complied with the statute in respect of Alice Kludjian’s attestation.

“ If a subscribing Avitness has forgotten the occurrence, or testifies against the execution of the will, or Avas not present Avith the other witness at the execution of the will; the will may nevertheless be established, upon proof of the handwriting of the testator, and of the subscribing witnesses, and also of such other circumstances as would be sufficient to prove the will upon the trial of an action.” (Surrogate’s Ct. Act, § 142.) Such circumstances are present in this proceeding. In addition to the fact that the instrument is a holograph, it contains provisions in favor of the íavo sole distributees of the decedent. The testimony of the witness Slap as to a valid execution should lend some ground to the assumption that the same procedure was followed as to the other witness. Her attitude before the court was one of evasion, and the court is inclined to discount her testimony. The instrument is admitted to probate.

Submit decree accordingly.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Texas Department of Public Safety v. MMC

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00008

- CV

Trial court case number: 21

- DCV

- 281103

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort B end County

On January 28, 202 2, appellant, the Texas Department of Public Safety, filed a Motion for Abatement, asking this Court to abate the appeal pen ding the resolution of two cases in the Texas Supreme Court : Ex par te K.T., Cause No. 20

- 097 7, and Ex parte Ferris , Cause No. 21

- 0075. The certificate of conference said appellee did not advise whether he opposed the mot ion.

More than t en days have passed since the motion was filed and no response has been filed.

We grant the motion and abate the appeal.

Unless the parties file, no later than July 1 , 20 22 , a motion to reinstate or a report advising the Court of the status of the S upreme C ourt proceedings, th is appeal may be reinsta ted

without further notice.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this Court’s active

docket.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Co unt iss

________________ Acting individually

Date: Febr uary 15

, 2022
# C_2008259EN.01S00301.xml

| 11.10.2008 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 259/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.10.2008

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 259/s3

---

NOTE TO THE READER

NOTE TO THE READER

The institutions have decided no longer to quote in their texts the last amendment to cited acts.

Unless otherwise indicated, references to acts in the texts published here are to the version of those acts currently in force.

---
SCWC

- 1 4

- 0000 391

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI  I

STATE OF HAWAI  I, Petitioner and Respondent /Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

SHAWN D. VISINTIN , Respondent and Petitioner /Defendant

- Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP

- 1 4

- 0000 391 ; CR. NO. 13

- 1

- 0166 )

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Respondent and Petitioner/ Defendant

- Appell ant ’s

application for writ of certiorari, filed on May 10 , 2018, is

hereby accepted

.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be

held in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuan t

to R ule 34(c) of the Hawai  i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move

for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai  i, June 20 , 2018.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-14-0000391 20-JUN-2018 01:45 PM
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Charles E. Phillips, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this amended annual report on Form 10-K/A of Infor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



|                      |  |                                     
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: August 22, 2014 |  | /s/ CHARLES E. PHILLIPS, JR.        
|                      |  | Charles E. Phillips, Jr.            
|                      |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
Exhibit 99(a)

                            LAFAYETTE BANCORPORATION
                              133 North 4th Street
                                  P.O. Box 1130
                            Lafayette, Indiana 47902


               PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints _________________________________, and each of
them, proxies of the undersigned, with full power of substitution and
re-substitution, to represent and vote all shares of common stock of Lafayette
Bancorporation which the undersigned would be entitled to vote at the special
meeting of shareholders of Lafayette Bancorporation to be held at Lafayette
Bancorporation's principal office, located at 133 North 4th Street, Lafayette,
Indiana, on ___________, ________ ___, 2002, at _:__ _.m. local time, and at any
adjournment thereof, with all of the powers the undersigned would possess if
personally present, as set forth below.

The Board of Directors of Lafayette Bancorporation recommends a vote FOR
approval of the Agreement of Reorganization and Merger dated October 14, 2001,
by and between First Merchants Corporation and Lafayette Bancorporation pursuant
to which Lafayette Bancorporation will merge with and into First Merchants
Corporation, and Lafayette Bank and Trust Company will become a wholly-owned
subsidiary of First Merchants Corporation.

     1.   Approval of the Agreement of Reorganization and Merger:

          ________ FOR         _______ AGAINST         ________ ABSTAIN

     2.   In their discretion, on such other matters as may properly be
          presented at the special meeting.

THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED, BUT IF NOT OTHERWISE DIRECTED, THIS PROXY
WILL BE VOTED FOR APPROVAL OF THE AGREEMENT OF REORGANIZATION AND MERGER. ON ANY
OTHER MATTERS THAT MAY PROPERLY BE PRESENTED AT THE SPECIAL MEETING, THIS PROXY
WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF LAFAYETTE BANCORPORATION.

PLEASE COMPLETE, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY.

Dated: ______________, 2002.

                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       (SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER)


                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       (SIGNATURE OF SHAREHOLDER)

PLEASE SIGN EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME APPEARS ON YOUR STOCK CERTIFICATE. JOINT OWNERS
SHOULD EACH SIGN PERSONALLY. TRUSTEES AND OTHERS SIGNING IN A REPRESENTATIVE
CAPACITY SHOULD INDICATE THE CAPACITY IN WHICH THEY SIGN.

                                  Ex. 99(a)-1
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renegy Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    By:
    /s/ Robert M. WorsleyName:
    Robert M. WorsleyTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

CLAYTON WILLIAMS ENERGY, INC.

and CHESAPEAKE EXPORATION,

L.L.C.,

Appellants,

v.

BMT O & G TX, L.P., GOLIAD O & G

TX, L.P., WD O & G TX, L.P.,

KEYSTONE O & G TX, L.P., and THRU

LINE O & G TX, L.P.,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 4

- 00 133

- CV

Appeal from the

143rd District Court

of Reeves County, Texas

(TC# 12

- 02

- 20072

- CVR )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore vacate the portion of the trial court’s judgment awarding title and

injunctive relief to non

- litigant CTV O & G TX, L.P.

We further reverse the remai nder of the trial court’s judgment and render judgment that

the Appellees take nothing against the Appellants, in accordance with this Court’s opinion. We

further order this decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 8TH DAY O F JULY, 2015.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nine Mile Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **Damon Deru**, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,            pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

**/s/ DAMON DERU**

 

**Damon Deru**

Chief Executive Officer

Principal Accounting Officer

August 10, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its            staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
SHARE

# FFESD Contacts

**Laura Scheele**

Communications Lead

Fusion and Fission Energy and Science Directorate

scheelela@ornl.gov | 219.381.8672

 

**Sean Simoneau**

Communications Specialist & Science Writer

Fusion and Fission Energy and Science Directorate

simoneausm@ornl.gov

 

**Liz McCrory**

Communications Specialist & Science Writer

Fusion and Fission Energy and Science Directorate

mccroryea@ornl.gov
trtc_ex1022.htm


EXHIBIT 10.22







July 30, 2014


 


Terra Tech Corp.


18101 Von Karman


Third Floor


Irvine, CA 92612







Re: Amendment to Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Amendment”)







Ladies & Gentlemen:


 


Reference is made to that certain Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of February 5, 2014, between Dominion Capital LLC (including certain assignees thereto) (“Dominion” or “we”) and Terra Tech Corp. (the “Company” or “you”) (the “SPA”). All capitalized terms not defined herein will carry the same meanings and definitions in the SPA.







The Company has requested and we have agreed to accelerate the remaining amount due pursuant to the SPA, with a final closing and funding date set for July [25], 2014 (the “Ultimate Closing”). To that end, we have agreed to amend each of Sections 2.1 and 2.2 of the SPA to specifically provide for a closing of $2,750,000. All Closing Conditions in Section 2.4 of the SPA, and all Representations and Warranties in Article III shall remain unaltered, modified or amended by this Amendment. Furthermore, the Other Agreements of the Parties in Article IV of the SPA will remain in force, and, specifically (without limitation of any other provision or section of Article IV, Section 4.11(b) with the reservation of at least 400% of the Required Minimum in the form of a letter executed by the Company’s transfer agent shall be in force and valid prior to this Ultimate Closing.







Finally the Company and we agree that in consideration of this Amendment and the undertakings thereunder, the Company agrees to file, within two (2) business days of the Ultimate Closing, a registration statement on Form S-1 with the Securities and Exchange Commission that will register all shares of the Company’s Common Stock into which the Notes and Warrants convert that have been issued pursuant to the SPA. The parties agree that that number is 95,427,643 shares in respect of the Notes and 11,491,228 in respect of the Warrants or 106,918,871 shares in total.







This Amendment may be executed two or more counterparts, all of which when taken together shall be considered one and the same agreement and shall become effective when counterparts have been signed by each party and delivered to each other party, it being understood that the parties need not sign the same counterpart. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf” format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or “.pdf” signature page were an original thereof.


 


[Signatures follow on next page.]


 




  





1











  






 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to the SPA to be duly executed by their respective authorized signatories as of the date first indicated above.


 


 



	
DOMINION CAPITAL LLC

	 	
TERRA TECH CORP.

	 
	 	 	 	 
	BY:	/s/ Mikhail Gurevich	 	
BY:

	/s/ Perek Peterson	 
	ITS:	Mikhail Gurevich 	 	ITS:	Derek Peterson, 	 
	 	Managing Member	 	 	CEO	 





 



 


2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3145 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3145

To amend the Fair Housing Act to clarify congressional intent that the 
  prohibitions of that Act do not extend to conduct that results in a 
  disparate impact on a protected class unless the person engaging in 
                   that conduct intends that impact.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2015

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Fair Housing Act to clarify congressional intent that the 
  prohibitions of that Act do not extend to conduct that results in a 
  disparate impact on a protected class unless the person engaging in 
                   that conduct intends that impact.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protect Local Independence in 
Housing Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. ``DISPARATE IMPACT'' CASES UNDER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT.

    Section 804(f) of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3604(f)) is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(10) Nothing in this title shall be construed to prohibit conduct 
resulting in a disparate impact on a class protected by this title 
unless the person engaging in that conduct intended that impact.''.
                                 <all>
```
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Group

1920 1954 1959 1986 

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 96-401 Date: July 15, 1996 

SUBJECT: FEHB Open Season - Introduction

_________________________________________________________________

DATES

___________________________________________________

 Dates The 1996 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) open

season will be held from November 11 through December 9.

_________________________________________________________________

HOTLINE

___________________________________________________

 Number The number for the open season Hotline is 202-606-0777, ext.

952.

___________________________________________________

 Purpose The Hotline enables us to provide agencies with information

regarding open season efficiently and quickly.

___________________________________________________

 How It Works The Hotline contains a recorded message with information about

the 1996 open season. As new information becomes available,

the recording is updated.

At the end of the recording, you may leave a message if you

have a question about open season.

___________________________________________________

 Users The Hotline is to be used only by agency headquarters

Insurance Officers.

Employees should direct their questions to their personnel office.
BAL 96-401

-2-

Personnel offices should direct their questions to their

headquarters Insurance Officer.

The Hotline cannot be used by or on behalf of annuitants.

___________________________________________________________________________

CHANGES AFFECTING THE 1996 OPEN SEASON

FEHB Guides Except as noted below, there will be no changes in quantity of RI

70-1, the FEHB Guide used by most employees, for the 1996

open season. The same quantity that was printed for the 1995

open season, i.e., an amount equal to 60% of an agency's

population, will be printed for this year's open season. However,

RI 70-7, the Guide for overseas employees, will not be printed

for 1996. Instead, overseas employees will be given RI 70-1. 

Consequently, agencies with employees overseas must include

their overseas employees in their population count for our

calculation of the quantity to be printed. 

Audio Cassettes OPM will not be involved in the ordering of audio cassette tapes

for the visually impaired. Agencies must order these tapes

directly from the open fee-for-service plans. When we send the

Benefits Administration Letter on ordering and distribution (this

should be issued in late August), we will send the list of plan

contacts for ordering the tapes.

 OPM Mainstreet All versions of the FEHB Guide, and the Press Release

announcing the 1997 rates, will be uploaded to OPM Mainstreet. 

We will also upload the brochure for any health plan that

submits its brochure text in an acceptable format. About 100

plans submitted their 1996 brochures to OPM Mainstreet, and

we expect more to do so for 1997.

 Abby L. Block, Chief

 Insurance Policy 

 and Information Division