SIP SUBMITTAL COMPLETENESS CRITERIA CHECKLIST (in accordance with 40 CFR Part 51

- App. V)

SIP Submitted by: Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection

Date Submitted: March 25, 2014 Subject: Pennsylvania Regional Haze State Implementation Plan Revision: BART Limits for the Cheswick Power Plant, Allegheny

County

Completeness Review /s/ Completed by: Irene Shandruk Date Completed: April 2 3 , 201 4

Administrative Materials

ACCEPTABLE

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. A formal letter of submittal from the Governor or his designee, requesting EPA approval of the plan or revision thereof. 1. Letter dated March 25, 2014 from E. Christopher Abruzzo

, Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection to Shawn M. Garvin, Regional Administrator. X

2. Evidence that the State has adopted the plan in the State code or body of regulatio ns; or issued the permit, order, consent agreement in final form. That evidence shall include the date of adoption or final issuance as well as the effective date of the plan, if different from the adoption/issuance date. 2. The State has submitted evide nce that the regulations and permits were issued and approved in accordance with the Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) via issuance of the ACHD November 7, 2012 Review Memo. X

3. Evidence that the State has the necessary legal authority under

Sta te law to adopt and implement the plan. 3. Allegheny County Health Department (ACHD) has legal authority under Local Health Administration Law, Act 315 of August 24, 1951, P.L. 1304. ACHD has an air pollution control program that has been approved by PADE P in accordance with

Section 12 of the Air Pollution Control Act. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

4. A copy of actual regulation, or document submitted for approval and incorporation by reference into the plan, including indication of the changes made to the existing approved plan, w here applicable. The submittal shall be a copy of the official State regulation/document signed, stamped, dated by the appropriate State official indicating that it is fully enforceable by the State. The effective date of the regulation/document shall, w henever possible,

be indicated in the document itself. 4. A copy of the ACHD November 7, 2012 Review Memo was submitted. X

5. Evidence that the State followed all of the procedural requirements of the State's laws and constitution in conducting a nd completing the adoption/issuance of the plan. 5. Cover letter transmitting the SIP revision dated March 25,

2014 . Copies and certification of public hearing notices. X

6. Evidence that public notice was given of the proposed change

consistent with procedures approved by EPA, including the date of publication of such notice. 6. Notice of public hearing and public comment period was published in the Pennsylvania Bulletin on December 21, 2013 as well as in numerous newspapers. X

7. Certification th at public hearings were held in accordance with the information provided in the public notice and the State's laws and constitution, if applicable. 7. Public hearings were scheduled for January 21, 2014, but were cancelled due to the lack of public intere st. X

8. Compilation of public comments and the State's response thereto. 8. One public comment was received and a response was provided. Comments from the Federal Land Managers were also received and the responses were provided. XTechnical Materials

EPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

1. Identification of all regulated pollutants affected by the plan. 1. The submittal identifies PM10, SO2, and NOx. X

2. Identification of the locations of affected sources including the EPA attainment/nonattainment designation of the locations and the status of the attainment plan for the affected area(s). 2. Allegheny County in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

. X

3. Quantification of the changes in plan allowable emissions from the affected sources; estimates of changes in current actual emissions from affected sources or, where appropriate, quantification of changes in actual emissions from affected sources through

calculations of the di fferences between certain baseline levels and allowable emissions anticipated as a result of the revision. 3. The plan established requirements to limit PM10 emissions from the Cheswick Power Plant and additionally corrected

emission limit for SO2 and NOx by removing these limits and relying upon the CAIR requirements. X

4. The State's demonstration that the national ambient air quality standards, prevention of significant deterioration increments, reasonable further progress demonstration, and visibi lity, as applicable, are protected if the plan is approved and implemented. 4. The SIP revision consists of a demonstration that a correction to the Pennsylvania Regional Haze SIP will have minimal visibility impact, and thereby will protect air quality. X

5. Modeling information required to support the proposed revision, including input data, output data, models used, ambient monitoring data used, meteorological data used, justification for use of offsite data (where used), modes of models used, assu mptions, and other information relevant to the determination of adequacy of the modeling analysis. 5. Appropriate modeling demonstration was included in

support of the required revision

. X

6. Evidence, where necessary, that emission limitations are bas ed on continuous emission reduction technology. 6. The plan corrected requirements to limit PM10 from the Cheswick plant. XEPA REQUIREMENT STATE SUBMITTAL (X)

7. Evidence that the plan contains emission limitations, work practice standards and recordkeeping/reporting requirements, where necessary, to ensure emission levels. 7. The plan established requirements to limit PM10 emissions from the Cheswick plant, which was incorporated in the Installation Permit and the Title V Operating Permit. X

8. Compliance/enforcement strategies, in cluding how compliance will be determined in practice. 8. The plan established requirements to limit PM10 emissions from the Cheswick plant, which was incorporated in the Installation Permit and the Title V Operating Permit. X

9. Special economic and technological justifications required by any applicable EPA policies. (If a policy is not appropriate, explain why.) 9. No special justifications are required. X

10. A Section 107 request must be accompanied by a maintenance plan demonstrating mainten ance to the relevant NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. 10. Not applicable because this is not a section 107 request. X