alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-89,139-01

EX PARTE CHRISTOPHER WAYNE ROBIN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 08-03949-A IN THE 252ND DISTRICT COURT

FROM JEFFERSON COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to fifty-six years’ imprisonment. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his

conviction. Robin v. State, No. 13-14-00218-CR (Tex. App. — Corpus Christi – Edinburg 2015)

(not designated for publication). 

Applicant contends that he was denied his right to petition this Court for discretionary review

because appellate counsel failed to timelynotifyApplicant that his conviction had been affirmed and
2

send him a copy of the appellate opinion.

Appellate counsel filed an affidavit with the trial court. Based on that affidavit, the trial court

has entered findings of fact and conclusions of law that Applicant did not receive timely notice of

the appellate decision or a copy of the appellate opinion as a result of a breakdown in the system. 

The trial court recommends that relief be granted. Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App.

2006); Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997). 

We find, therefore, that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition

for discretionary review of the judgment of the Thirteenth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 13-11-

00218-CR that affirmed his conviction in Cause No. 3949 from the 252nd District Court of Jefferson

County. Applicant shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of

the date on which this Court’s mandate issues.

Delivered: November 7, 2018

Do not publish
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SFH II Acquisition Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armen Karapetyan,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.




/s/
                Armen KarapetyanArmen
                Karapetyan
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              May
                14, 2008
EXHIBIT 21

                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         PEM International, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

         PEM International (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., incorporated under the laws of
the State of Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

         PEM Management, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

         PEM World Sales, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, is 100%
owned by the Registrant.

         Arconix Group, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100%
owned by the Registrant.

         PEM Industries, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100%
owned by the Registrant.

         PennEngineering Holdings, Inc., incorporated under the laws of
Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.



                     INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

         Atlas Engineering, Inc., incorporated under the laws of Ohio, is 100%
owned by PennEngineering Holdings, Inc.

         Arconix/Singapore Pte. Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Delaware,
is 100% owned by Arconix Group, Inc.

         Arconix/U.K. Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Delaware, is 100%
owned by Arconix Group, Inc.

         Arconix/USA Inc., incorporated under the laws of California, is 100%
owned by Arconix Group, Inc.

         Arconix/Mexico, S. de R.L., incorporated under the laws of Mexico, is
99% owned by PEM Industries, Inc. and 1% owned by Arconix Group, Inc.

         Arconix/Mexico Management S.A. de C.V., incorporated under the laws of
Mexico, is 99.998% owned by PEM Industries, Inc. and .002% owned by Arconix
Group, Inc.

         Arconix Fastening Distribution (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., incorporated under
the laws of The Peoples Republic of China, is 100% owned by PennEngineering
Global Holdings SRL.

<page>

         PEM Fastening Systems/Europe Holdings Ltd., incorporated under the laws
of Ireland, is 100% owned by PennEngineering Holdings, Inc.

         PEM Fastening Systems/Europe Ltd., incorporated under the laws of
Ireland, is 100% owned by PEM Fastening Systems/Europe Holdings Ltd.

         PennEngineering Global Holdings SRL, incorporated under the laws of
Barbados, WI, is 99.09% owned by PennEngineering Holdings, Inc., and 0.01% by
Arconix Group, Inc.

         PennEngineering World Holdings L.P., a limited partnership formed under
the laws of Bermuda, has as a General Partner, PennEngineering Holdings, Inc.,
and as a Limited Partner, Arconix Group, Inc.

         Maelux SA, incorporated under the laws of Luxembourg, is owned 100% by
PennEngineering World Holdings L.P.

         M.A.E. SpA, incorporated under the laws of Italy, is 100% owned by
Maelux SA.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 06255**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 

### 06255\06255_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 06255\06255_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 

### 06255\06255_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 

### 06255\06255_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06255\06255_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 06255\06255_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file



### 06255\Certification Statement_06255.pdf Plant certification statement 

### x 06255\Supporting Documentation\06255_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06255\Supporting Documentation\06255_WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06255\Supporting Documentation\06255_WB-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06255\Supporting Documentation\WB-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 06255\Supporting Documentation\WB-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
SHARE

# What you must bring

## User Entry Pass

A User Entry Pass***** is provided to approved users who have scheduled visits and have completed their Site Access Training.  Approximately 7 days before your scheduled visit, you will receive an email from ORNL with an attached User Entry Pass, which you should print and bring with you.  The Pass is beneficial for expediting your entry through security onto the ORNL site and for assistance at the Visitor Center.

******If you are unable to print your User Entry Pass or forget to bring it, you can still access the ORNL site after the security staff confirms your approval for access.*

## Photo identification

Effective March 30, 2015, ORNL will/has become fully compliant with the REAL ID Act. This Act requires that anyone accessing a Federal Facility, which ORNL is, must present a compliant form of identification. If you are from one of the noncompliant states, you will need to provide another form of approved identification. Here is a list of acceptable identification if you are from one of these states. You will not be allowed entry to any ORNL facility unless you have a form of compliant identification as listed here.

Non-US citizens must bring their valid original passport and Visa, including I-20 document, if applicable.
185 

Miles of fiber-optic

cable installed

in Summit

4,608 

Number of

Summit

nodes

250 

Petabytes of data

storage provided by

Summit’s file

system

200 

Number of petaflops

supplied by

Summit

In 2018, the OLCF launched Summit, the latest leap in leadership-class computing systems 

for open science. The IBM AC922 system offers scientists 200 petaflops of performance, or 200 

million billion calculations per second. Summit delivers about eight times the performance 

of its predecessor, the 27-petaflop Titan supercomputer, and represents a substantial step 

toward the nation’s first exascale machine, a system capable of a billion billion calculations 

per second. The same year it launched, researchers broke the exascale barrier on Summit 

with a genomics algorithm, achieving a peak throughput of 2.36 exaops, or 2.36 billion billion 

reduced precision calculations per second—the fastest science application ever reported.

Leading the Way

Summit allows researchers to add much more complexity to their codes than past systems, 

enabling simulations of greater resolution and higher fidelity to advance human knowledge. 

Some exciting Summit research projects include:

• studying exploding stars at unprecedented scales,

• simulating particle turbulence in sustainable fusion reactions,

• researching materials for high-temperature superconductors, and

• carrying out fluid dynamics simulations to accelerate combustion science.

An AI Supercomputer

In addition to modeling and simulation, Summit offers researchers unparalleled opportunities 

for the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and scientific discovery. Applying AI techniques 

like machine learning and deep learning to automate, accelerate, and drive understanding at 

supercomputer scales will help scientists achieve breakthroughs in human health, energy, and 

engineering and answer fundamental questions about the universe. 

January 2022

“The computational speed of Summit 

is helping us simulate the evolution 

of the structures in the universe we 

observe with very large telescopes.”

 Katrin Heitmann, Summit User and Physicist

 Argonne National Laboratory

 

ornl.gov

Oak Ridge National Laboratory is managed by 

UT-Battelle LLC for the US Department of Energy

CONTACT:

Justin Whitt

Program Director 

Oak Ridge Leadership

Computing Facility

whitt@ornl.gov

865-576-0156

One Bethel Valley Road, 

Oak Ridge, TN 37830

SUMMIT:

Scaling New Heights 

OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY

The Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility (OLCF), a US Department of Energy Office of Science User Facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 

provides access to the nation’s fastest supercomputer to address some of the grand challenges of our time and enable scientific breakthroughs 

in science domains as diverse as biology, nuclear science, and cosmology.
# ESTD Tools 

## Tools

## Building Technologies 

View a hi-res version of this image

### Air Tight Savings Calculator

View a hi-res version of this image

### AutoBEM

View a hi-res version of this image

### Cool Roof Calculator

View a hi-res version of this image

### Roof Savings Calculator

View a hi-res version of this image

### Zip Code Insulation Program

View a hi-res version of this image

### Insulation Fact Sheet

View a hi-res version of this image

### Autotune

View a hi-res version of this image

### DOE Steep Roof Calculator

View a hi-res version of this image

### Heat Pump Design Model

View a hi-res version of this image

### DOE/ORNL Fingertip Fluid Properties (fProp)

## Transportation

View a hi-res version of this image

### Bioenergy Knowledge Discovery Framework

View a hi-res version of this image

### Fueleconomy.gov

View a hi-res version of this image

### MA3T Model

View a hi-res version of this image

### Transportation Fact of the Week

## Electrification and Energy Infrastructure

View a hi-res version of this image

### SolidPAC
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 82286]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23419]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12562]


International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) Meeting Notice

ACTION: Closed meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    In accordance with section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1009(a)(2), the Department of State announces a 
meeting of the International Security Advisory Board (ISAB) to take 
place on October 30, 2024, at the Department of State, Washington, DC.
    Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. 1009(d), and 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1), it has been determined that 
this Board meeting will be closed to the public because the Board will 
be reviewing and discussing matters properly classified in accordance 
with Executive Order 13526. The purpose of the ISAB is to provide the 
Department with a continuing source of independent advice on all 
aspects of arms control, disarmament, nonproliferation, outer space, 
critical infrastructure, cybersecurity, the national security aspects 
of associated technologies, international security, and related aspects 
of public diplomacy. The agenda for this meeting will include 
classified discussions related to the Board's ongoing studies on 
current U.S. policy and issues regarding biotechnology and military-
civil fusion strategy, multilateral disarmament structures, and 
security cooperation and arms transfers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For more information, contact Michelle 
Dover, Executive Director of the International Security Advisory Board, 
Department of State, Washington, DC 20520, telephone: (202) 736-4930, 
email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#74301b02110639313407001500115a131b02"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="b6f2d9c0d3c4fbf3f6c5c2d7c2d398d1d9c0">[email protected]</span></a>.

Michelle E. Dover,
Executive Director, International Security Advisory Board, Department 
of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-23419 Filed 10-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-27-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40344

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSUE GUZMAN-GUTIERREZ,

also known as Josque Guzman-Gutierrez,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-01-CR-825-ALL

--------------------

September 24, 2002

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Josue Guzman-Gutierrez appeals his sentence with respect to

the imposition of a three-year term of supervised release

following his plea of guilty to a charge of being found in the

United States after deportation, a violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. 

He contends that the felony conviction that resulted in his

increased sentence under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) was an element of

the offense that should have been charged in the indictment.
No. 02-40344

-2-

Guzman-Gutierrez acknowledges that his argument was rejected

by the Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United

States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he seeks to preserve the issue

for Supreme Court review in light of the decision in Apprendi v.

New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 490 (2000). This argument is

foreclosed because Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. 

See Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 489-90, 496; United States v. Dabeit,

231 F.3d 979, 984 (5th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S. Ct. 1214

(2001). 

Guzman-Gutierrez also argues that the district court

committed error during the plea colloquy by advising him that he

was subject to a maximum of one year of supervised release. 

Guzman-Gutierrez does not seek to withdraw his plea, but he wants

his sentence reformed to reflect one year of supervised release. 

The Government concedes the error and also urges the court to

reform the judgment of conviction. See United States v. Glinsey,

209 F.3d 386, 394-96 (5th Cir.) cert. denied, 531 U.S. 919, 394

(2000).

Guzman-Gutierrez’s term of supervised release is MODIFIED to

one year. The conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED.
OPM.gov / Telework / Managing Teleworkers

# Managing Teleworkers

Telework can help managers attract and retain the best qualified employees, provide individuals with uninterrupted blocks of time to work on key projects, and support the organization's effective functioning during crisis situations and other business interruptions.

            -  Telework Basics**
Maximize the benefit of telework for you and your team
Visit Section 
            -  Results-Oriented Management**
Use telework as an outcomes-based management tool 
Visit Section 
            -  Work Schedules**
Provide multiple flexibilities for your team through telework
Visit Section 
            -  Emergency Planning**
Use telework to enhance your agency's continuity of operations
Visit Section 
            -  Assessing Job Tasks**
Determine telework eligibility criteria for employees
Visit Section 

Find Telework Coordinators
Use this tool to find your agency's work-life coordinator(s)
Telework Manager Training
Learn basic telework concepts and how to be an effective manager in a telework environment
#### BURNS v. STATE.

No. 17927.

Court of Criminal Appeals of *Texas.*

Feb. 12, 1936.

Baker & Baker, of Coleman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; punishment being two years and six months in the penitentiary.

Since the conviction the law upon which the prosecution was predicated has been repealed without any saving clause. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W. (2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
**Highlands
      Acquisition Corp.**


**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert
      W. Pangia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                May 9, 2008
            *By:*
            */s/
                Robert W. Pangia*Name:
            Robert
                W. PangiaTitle:
            Chief
                Executive Officer(Principal
                Executive Officer)





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3391 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3391

 To provide Governors of States with the authority to withhold Federal 
financial assistance from units of local government that do not comply 
           with the immigration laws, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2015

  Mr. Perry introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide Governors of States with the authority to withhold Federal 
financial assistance from units of local government that do not comply 
           with the immigration laws, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AUTHORITY TO WITHHOLD FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.

    A Governor of a State may withhold Federal financial assistance (as 
such term is defined in section 7501(a)(5) of title 31, United States 
Code) from a unit of local government in that State that has not 
complied with the immigration laws (as such term is defined in section 
101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)), as 
determined by the Governor.
                                 <all>
```
#### SOUTHERN LIFE & HEALTH INS. CO. v. SOTO.

No. 2515.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Feb. 15, 1934.

John O. Douglas, of Houston, for appellant.

Orrin H. Bonney and Wm. S. Bell, both of Houston, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a-judgment of the county court at law of Harris county, in favor of appellee and against appellant for $497.38. The appeal was to the Court of Civil Appeals for the First Judicial District at Galveston and on eqiialization of the docket by the Supreme Court the case was transferred to this court.

Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss on the ground, among others, that appellant has failed to prosecute its appeal.

No briefs or assignments of error have been filed by appellant Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is granted. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W. (2d) 811.