alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 5.1
 
  
  Company Registration Statement Securities Act Secondary Common Stock
     Vinson & Elkins LLP   Attorneys at Law
    
    2801 Via Fortuna, Suite 100Austin   Beijing   Dallas   Dubai   Hong Kong   Houston
    
    Austin, TX 78746-7568London   Moscow   New York   Shanghai   Tokyo   Washington
    
    Tel512.542.8400   Fax512.542.8612   www.velaw.com




---



##### 



(V & E Logo)
    
    Orion Marine Group, Inc.   October 2, 2007   Page 2
  Very truly yours,/s/ Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20701 and #20702; NORTH CAROLINA Disaster Number NC-20007]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of North Carolina (FEMA-4827-DR), dated September 28, 2024.

# DATES:

Issued on October 4, 2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         November 27, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 30, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small                               ( print page 82670)                            Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of North Carolina, dated September 28, 2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Incident:*                     Tropical Storm Helene.                

*Incident Period:*                     September 25, 2024 and continuing.                

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Mecklenburg, Swain.                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

North Carolina: Cabarrus, Union.

South Carolina: Lancaster.

Tennessee: Blount.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-23576 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 00-208 Date: March 28, 2000

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Special Open

Enrollment for Enrollees of Community Health Plan (CHP) of Ohio,

Enrollment code MG

This is to advise you that CHP of Ohio, enrollment code MG, will be reducing its service area. 

The following 38 counties will no longer be offered under the FEHB Program effective

June 30, 2000:

•Athens • Belmont • Brown • Clermont • Clinton • Coshocton • Delaware • Fairfield • Fayette

• Franklin • Knox • Gallia • Greene • Guernsey • Harrison • Highland • Hocking • Holmes •

Jackson • Lawrence • Marion • Meigs • Monroe • Morgan • Morrow • Muskingum • Noble •

Perry • Pickaway • Pike • Richland • Ross • Scioto • Tuscarawas • Union • Vinton • Warren •

Washington

We are authorizing a special open enrollment period for CHP enrollees in these counties,

during which they must change to another participating plan. The special open enrollment

period will begin on May 22, 2000 and end on June 16, 2000. Enrollees in the above

counties must submit a Standard Form (SF) 2809 to their agency personnel offices to

change their plans. The effective date of all changes made during this special open

enrollment period will be June 18, 2000.

Licking, Ottawa, Sandusky, and Seneca counties will continue in the plan’s service area with

retention of their local provider networks.

The Plan will send enrollees a letter on its letterhead to advise them of this special open

enrollment. We have attached a copy of the text of that letter for your information.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Attachment

 Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 17, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131372 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

MICHAEL COLTON, Personal Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, Representative of the Estate of Justices Alexis Hall, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 131372 

 COA: 268533 

St. Clair CC: 05-001942-NH 

DEVKUMAR S. NANDAMUDI, 

M.D., a/k/a DEVELOPMENT S.

NANDAMUDI, M.D., and 

CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE 

OF PORT HURON,

 Defendants-Appellants, 

and 

PORT HURON HOSPITAL,

 Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

By order of September 26, 2006, the application for leave to appeal the April 28, 

2006 order of the Court of Appeals was held in abeyance pending the decision in 

Washington v Sinai Hospital of Greater Detroit (Docket No. 130641). On order of the 

Court, the case having been decided on June 27, 2007, 478 Mich 412 (2007), the 

application is again considered and, it appearing to this Court that the case of Braverman 

v Garden City Hospital (Docket Nos. 134445-134446) is pending on appeal before this 

Court and that the decision in that case may resolve an issue raised in the present 

application for leave to appeal, we ORDER that the application be held in ABEYANCE 

pending the decision in that case. 

l1010 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 17, 2007 

 Clerk
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 365 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a notice and comment 

rulemaking before implementing certain policies relating to obstruction 

evaluation aeronautical studies, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 14, 2015 

Mr. COHEN (for himself and Mr. SCHWEIKERT) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Transportation to conduct a notice 

and comment rulemaking before implementing certain 

policies relating to obstruction evaluation aeronautical 

studies, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. OBSTRUCTION EVALUATION AERONAUTICAL 

4 STUDIES. 

5 The Secretary of Transportation may implement the 

6 policy set forth in the notice of proposed policy entitled 

7 ‘‘Proposal To Consider the Impact of One Engine Inoper8 ative Procedures in Obstruction Evaluation Aeronautical 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 365 IH

1 Studies’’ published by the Department of Transportation 

2 on April 28, 2014 (79 Fed. Reg. 23300), only if the policy 

3 is adopted pursuant to notice and comment rulemaking 

4 and, for purposes of Executive Order 12866 (5 U.S.C. 601 

5 note; relating to regulatory planning and review), is treat6 ed as a significant regulatory action within the scope of 

7 section 3(f)(1) of such Order. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States Office of Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 22-307 Date: September 2022 

Subject: September 2022 Headcount 

This is a reminder for all payroll providers, including cross-service providers 

(e.g., National Finance Center (NFC), Defense Finance and Accounting 

Service (DFAS), etc.), to submit the semiannual Headcount for the 

September 2022 reporting period no later than September 30, 2022. 

The semiannual Headcount reporting (March and September) provides the 

Office of Personnel (OPM) with a snapshot of agency-wide enrollment for 

participants in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), Federal 

Employees Retirement System (FERS), Federal Employees Retirement 

System – Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-RAE), Federal Employees 

Retirement System – Further Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE), 

Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program, and/or the Federal 

Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Program. 

The September 2022 Headcount reporting period is for payroll paid during 

the first 15 days of September for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles. For 

monthly pay cycles, the reporting period is August 1 through August 31, 

2022.

Note: All Payroll providers are required to use OPM’s Headcount Collection 

System (HCS) to input data and submit OPM Forms 1523 and 2812A 

electronically. HCS also provides an electronic upload feature using a 

standardized template. 
Benefits Administration Letter 22-307 

2 

For questions about the new electronic collection process, please contact the 

Headcount Support Team at HeadcountSupport@opm.gov. 

Headcount reports must be submitted no later than September 30, 2022. If 

report submission delays or difficulties are anticipated, please call Ms. Yadira 

Vega at 202-606-4842, Olayla Ruffin at 202-606-1498, Erik Brown 202-606-

1418 or email Fundsmanagement@opm.gov. 

Note: Standard Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) reports 

should not be delayed because Headcount submissions are not 

ready/complete. 

Sincerely, 

Sherri Jordan 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
#### PENA v. LE COMTE et al.

No. 8610.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 25, 1931.

Rehearing Denied March 25, 1931.

*253Tom J. Newton, L. J. Gittinger, T. J. Newton, Jr., and Van Henry Archer, all of San Antonio, for appellant.

Ingrum & Smith and Ben S. Morris, all of San Antonio, for appellees.

COBBS, J.

Appellant instituted this suit against ap-pellees to restrain them from building a fence across Octavia place at or near the point where Octavia place enters the premises of appellant, or from in any manner closing said Octavia place to the use of appellant in going to and from his' said premises over and along said Octavia place.

The court refused to grant the writ, and the appellant appeals.

Appellees filed an answer alleging they were damaged in the sum of §25,000, and praying that no writ be granted for appellant, but that they be granted a writ of temporary injunction restraining appellant from in any way interfering with the right of appellees to erect a fence upon a ten-foot strip of land at the east end of Octavia place, and place the same in the condition in which it was before the wrongs perpetrated by the appellant -were done, and that they have their damages for $25,000. The court granted the injunction, but it was suspended until the appeal taken is decided.

Appellant showed no right or title in the property whatever. It was ten feet of ground that lay outside of Octavia place in a reservation, with no right whatever given to anybody to cross over the strip of ground permanently or to go over it at will.

There were other houses and settlements along Octavia street, and the occupants thereof were greatly disturbed by the passage of people and the passage of ears, which, created dust and noise, and amounted to a nuisance. To prevent this disturbance, it was intended to withdraw appellees’ permission and close the entrance upon this property, which was entered over the reservation.

As stated, appellant 'had no right or title to any of the ten-foot strip of land, and what use he had made of it was through the permission of appellees, who now sought to withdraw it.

 On the question of granting a temporary writ to restore the status of the thing in controversy pending the final disposition of the ease much has been written. Welsh et al. v. Carter (Tex. Civ. App.) 30 S.W.(2d) 354; Merrell et al. v. Moore et ux. (Tex. Civ. App.) 300 S. W. 953. It was said injunctions merely preserve the status until the final trial and the action of the court thereon is.a matter of discretion, and the “merits of the controversy between the parties are not proper to be considered at the time.” See, also, James v. E. Weinstein & Sons (Tex. Com. App.) 12 S.W.(2d) 959. No legal rights are shown to travel over this land. Santa Fe Town-Site Co. et al. v. Norvell (Tex. Civ. App.) 187 S. W. 978.

We do not think the court erred in refusing, under the circumstances, the writ, and leaving the parties to their legal and common-law remedies.

The judgment is affirmed.
# NSSD Recruiting Brochure

Download Document
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: In the Interest of L.C. and S.C., Minor Children

Appellate case number: 01-21-00521-CV

Trial court case number: 2020-28443

Trial court: 247th District Court of Harris County

On January 11, 2022, this Court advised Appellant Erna Aletta Cox that her appeal could

be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction unless she filed a response by January 21, 2022 

demonstrating by citation to the law that this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(a), 43.2(f). On January 20, 2022, Appellant filed a motion for extension of time, 

asking for an additional week in which to respond to the notice. Appellant’s motion is granted. 

Appellant’s response to this Court’s notice on jurisdiction is due January 28, 2022.

Appellant is instructed again to abide by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 and to 

refrain from filing any motion or other document that identifies the birth date, home address, or 

name of anyone who was a minor when the underlying suit was filed unless permitted by Rule 

9.9.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Veronica Rivas-Molloy

 Acting individually 

Date: January 21, 2022
|                                       |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                       |  |
| Citibank, N.A.                        | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Delaware |
| As ACOLT Indenture Trustee            | As ACOLT Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Kristen Driscoll     | Attn:  Mark DiGiacomo |
| 388 Greenwich Street, 14th Floor | 1011 Centre Road, Suite 200 |
| New York, NY 10013                    | Wilmington, DE 19805-1266 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
|   | Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas |
|   | Attn:  Corporate Trust & Agency Group - |
|   | Structured Finance Services |
|   | 60 Wall Street, 26th floor |
|   | MAil Stop:  NYC60-2606 |
|   | New York, NY 10005 |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | ACOLT 2012-SN1 - Servicing Agreement |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the ACOLT 2012-SN1 Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the ACOLT 2012-SN1  Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-10554 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus VICTOR MANUEL CHAVEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:00-CR-55-2

-------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Victor Manuel Chavez (“Chavez”) appeals his conviction for possession with the intent to distribute cocaine and aiding and abetting in violation 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) & (b)(1)(B) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Chavez argues that the district court erred in assessing a two-point sentencing enhancement pursuant to United States Sentencing Guideline § 2D1.1(b)(1). Chavez primarily argues that the two-point enhancement violates double jeopardy, and he contends that his due process rights were violated becauseNo. 01-10554 -2- he was not found guilty of possessing a firearm. Chavez contends that although he possessed a firearm on September 12, 2000, he pleaded guilty to the transaction which occurred on July 25, 2000, and there is no evidence that he possessed a firearm on that day. Section 2D1.1(b)(1) indicates that a defendant’s sentence should be increased by two levels whenever, in a crime involving the manufacture, import, export, trafficking, or possession of drugs, the defendant possessed a dangerous weapon. “The adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the offense.” U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1, comment. (n.3). The decision to apply the two-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) is a factual determination, reviewed for clear error. United States v. Dixon , 132 F.3d 192, 202 (5th Cir. 1997). A sentencing court need not limit its attention to the offense of conviction but may also increase a defendant’s sentence pursuant to § 2D1.1(b)(1) if it concludes that a firearm was possessed in connection with unadjudicated offenses that constitute relevant conduct, as defined by U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3. See United States v. Vital , 68 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 1995) ; see also United States v. Paulk , 917 F.2d 879, 883-84 (5th Cir. 1990). Therefore, the district court did not err in assessing Chavez a two-point sentencing enhancement for possession of a firearm. See United States v. Edwards , 911 F.2d 1031, 1033 (5thNo. 01-10554 -3- Cir. 1990); see also Witte v. United States , 515 U.S. 389, 401-03 (1995). Chavez’ sentence and conviction are AFFIRMED.
EX-35.2
(logo) Rialto
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT


March 1, 2013


To:  Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor
     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

2012 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series

* WFRBS 2012-C8

(Referred to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
   each of the Security Agreements are performed on behalf of the Special
   Servicer.

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer
   for the period of August 7, 2012, to December 31, 2012, in accordance with
   the servicing agreements applicable to each Security Agreement has been
   conducted under my supervision.

3. To the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
   obligations under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all material
   respects for the period of August 7, 2012, to December 31, 2012. If there has
   been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each
   failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified
   herewith.


Certified by: /s/ Thekla Salzman
              Thekla Salzman
              Chief Administrative Officer

Date: March 1, 2013
#### LINDLEY v. STATE.

No. 15762.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1932.

Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

The prosecution is apparently based upon article 1056, P. C. 1925, and charges that the appellant unlawfully and intentionally diverted natural gas from the pipe lines of R. L. Pearcy.

The penalty allowed by statute is not less than $25 nor more than $100. The penalty assessed in the present instance is a fine of $25. The prosecution originated in the justice court and was appealed' to the county court. Therefore, this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Such is the declaration of article 53, C. C. P. 1925. See, also, Ragsdale v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 47 S.W.(2d) 278.

The appeal is dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DARRYL JENKINS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 349 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 14th day of November, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
**Exhibit 32.1****Section 1350 Certification**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Encore Energy Partners LP (the “Partnership”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission(“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jon S. Brumley, Chief Executive Officer of EncoreEnergy Partners GP LLC, the General Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934;     and     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the     Partnership.     Date: May 8, 2008 /s/ Jon S. Brumley     Jon S. Brumley    Chief Executive Officer and President of Encore Energy    Partners GP LLC, the General Partner of Encore Energy    Partners LP       A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to thePartnership and will be retained by the Partnership and furnished to the SEC or its staff uponrequest.Note: The certification of the registrant furnished in this exhibit is not deemed “filed” forpurposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject tothe liabilities of that Section. Registration statements or other documents filed with the SECshall not incorporate this exhibit by reference, except as otherwise expressly stated in suchfiling.