**UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION**

**Washington, D.C. 20549**

**FORM 10-K**

(Mark One)

**x****  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021or**

**o**** ****TRANSITIONREPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**

**For the transition period from _____ to _____Commission file number of the issuing entity: 333-172143-07**

**Central Index Key Number of the issuing entity:0001558546**

**COMM 2012-CCRE4 Mortgage Trust**

**(exact name of the issuing entity as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the depositor: 0001013454**

**Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation**

**(exact name of the depositor as specified in itscharter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001541294**

**German American Capital Corporation**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001558761**

**Cantor Commercial Real EstateLending, L.P.**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

**Central Index Key Number of the sponsor: 0001089877**

**KeyBank National Association**

**(exact name of the sponsor as specified in its charter)**

** **

** **

| **New York****(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization of**

**the issuing entity)** | **38-3891310**

**38-3891311**

**38-7064521**

**(I.R.S. Employer**

**Identification Numbers)** |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**c/o Wells Fargo Bank, National Association**

**as Certificate Administrator**

**9062 Old Annapolis Road**

**Columbia, MD**

**(Address of principalexecutive offices of the issuing entity)**

**21045**

**(Zip Code)**

**Registrant’s telephone number,including area code:**

**(212) 250-2500**

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

| Title of each class | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each  exchange on which registered |
|---------------------|-------------------|--------------------------------------------|
| None                |              |                                       |

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of theAct:  None.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-knownseasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required tofile reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  o Yes ⌧No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filedall reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periodthat the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has beensubject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  ⌧ Yes oNo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submittedelectronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every InteractiveData File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and postsuch files).

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filerspursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is notcontained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’sknowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated byreference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form10-K.   

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a largeaccelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smallerreporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,”and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large acceleratedfiler        o                                                                                                       Acceleratedfiler                                     o

Non-acceleratedfiler          ⌧  (Do not check if asmaller reporting company)                          Smaller reporting company                    o

                                                                                                                                                       Emerging growthcompany                    o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if theregistrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complyingwith any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant toSection 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed areport on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectivenessof its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of theSarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firmthat prepared or issued its audit report.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shellcompany (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  o Yes ⌧ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-votingcommon equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price atwhich the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price ofsuch common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s mostrecently completed second fiscal quarter.

Not applicable.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed alldocuments and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securitiesunder a plan confirmed by a court.  oYes oNo

Not applicable.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of theregistrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Not applicable.

**DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE**

** **

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated byreference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) intowhich the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders;(2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuantto Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documentsshould be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report tosecurity holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980).

Not applicable.

 

** **

**EXPLANATORY NOTES**

The Prince Building Mortgage Loan and theEastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan, which constituted approximately 11.3%and 10.8%, respectively, of the asset pool of the issuing entity as of itscut-off date, are each an asset of the issuing entity and are each part of aloan combination that includes the Prince Building Mortgage Loan or theEastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, each ofwhich is not an asset of the issuing entity.  These loan combinations,including the Prince Building Mortgage Loan and the Eastview Mall and CommonsMortgage Loan, are being serviced and administered pursuant to the Pooling andServicing Agreement, which is incorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.1 to thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K. 

The Exhibit Index describesexhibits provided by certain parties (in their capacities indicated on theExhibit Index) with respect to the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan, whichconstituted approximately 3.6% of the asset pool of the issuing entity as ofits cut-off date.  The Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan is an asset ofthe issuing entity and is part of a loan combination that includes the EmeraldSquare Mall Mortgage Loan and one other pari passu loan, which is not an assetof the issuing entity.  The other pari passu portion of the loancombination was securitized in the COMM 2012-CCRE3 Mortgage Trust transaction,Commission File Number 333-172143-06 (the “COMM 2012-CCRE3 Transaction”). This loan combination, including the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan,is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling and servicingagreement for the COMM 2012-CCRE3 Transaction, which is incorporated byreference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The master servicer of a poolingand servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement also functions as theprimary servicer of the related mortgage loans serviced and administeredpursuant to such agreement unless a separate primary servicer is identifiedherein.  If this report does not identify a separate primary servicer, theservicer compliance statement provided by the master servicer under any suchagreement also encompasses its responsibilities as primary servicer of therelated mortgage loan or mortgage loans.

Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation is the master servicer and certificate administrator of themortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and theprimary servicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan. As a result, WellsFargo Bank, National Association is a “servicer” as defined in Item1108(a)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB, in the capacities described above, because itis servicing mortgage loans that constituted 10% or more of the assets of theissuing entity as of its cut-off date.  The assessments of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria, accountants’ attestation reports and servicercompliance statements delivered by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association inthe capacities described above are listed in the Exhibit Index.

KeyBank National Association, thespecial servicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan, is also one of thesponsors.  Therefore, the Depositor included in this Annual Report on Form10-K a servicer compliance statement for KeyBank National Association pursuantto Item 1123.  Because KeyBank National Association is servicing less than5% of the pool assets, an assessment of compliance with applicable servicingcriteria and an accountants’ attestation report pursuant to Item 1122 ofRegulation AB are not required by Regulation AB.  As the attestation madein the servicer compliance statement required by Item 1123 relates to a reviewof the servicing activities of KeyBank National Association under theapplicable servicing agreement, and that review was conducted in conjunctionwith the servicer’s preparation of its assessment of compliance with applicableservicing criteria, that assessment of compliance with applicable servicingcriteria and the accompanying accountants’ attestation report are included inthis Annual Report on Form 10-K for the sake of completeness.

U.S. Bank National Associationacts as trustee of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement and the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan.  Pursuant to thePooling and Servicing Agreement and the pooling and servicing agreement for theCOMM 2012-CCRE3 Transaction, the trustee is required to provide an assessmentof compliance with applicable servicing criteria solely with respect to Item1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB (regarding advances of funds or guaranteesregarding collections, cash flows or distributions, and any interest or otherfees charged for such advances, are made, reviewed and approved as specified inthe transaction agreements).  However, during the reporting period, thetrustee did not perform any servicing function with respect to the servicingcriteria specified in Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of Regulation AB.  The masterservicer or the special servicer, to the extent required, performed theservicing function identified with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) ofRegulation AB, and each such party included Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of RegulationAB in the assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountant’s attestation report for the subject transaction.  As a result,this Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an assessment of compliancewith applicable servicing criteria of the trustee.  One or more otherservicers of the mortgage loans serviced under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement and the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan have delivered one or moreassessments of compliance with respect to Item 1122(d)(2)(iii) of RegulationAB.

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes assessments of compliance with applicable servicing criteria andaccountants’ attestation reports from CoreLogic Solutions, LLC.  Thisentity was engaged by the master servicer under the Pooling and ServicingAgreement and the primary servicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan toremit tax payments received from the escrow accounts of borrowers to localtaxing authorities, to report tax amounts due, to verify tax parcelinformation, and to verify non-escrow tax payments.  These servicingfunctions are included within the servicing criteria set forth in Items1122(d)(4)(xi) and 1122(d)(4)(xii) of Regulation AB.  Therefore, under theprinciples-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) ofRegulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this vendoris a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.  SeeCompliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

This Annual Report on Form 10-Kincludes an assessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria,accountants’ attestation report and servicer compliance statement fromComputershare Trust Company, National Association (“CTCNA”).  CTCNAwas engaged by Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”), inits capacity as certificate administrator and custodian, to perform certainspecified servicing functions identified in the assessment of compliance withapplicable servicing criteria and accountants’ attestation reports.  WellsFargo engaged CTCNA in connection with the sale of Wells Fargo’s corporatetrust services business to CTCNA and its affiliates.  Further, under theprinciples-based definition of “servicer” set forth in Item 1101(j) ofRegulation AB that looks to the functions that an entity performs, this partyis a “servicer” for the purposes of Item 1123 of Regulation AB.  SeeCompliance and Disclosure Interpretations, Section 301.01 (Item 1101(j)).

Theassessment of compliance with applicable servicing criteria, accountants’attestation report and servicer compliance statement of the certificateadministrator of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan is omitted from thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K as the certificate administrator pursuant to therelated pooling and servicing agreement or trust and servicing agreement doesnot perform any activities that address servicing criteria with respect to theissuing entity and because it is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria inItem 1108(a)(2)(i) through (iii) of Regulation AB.

With respect to the pari passuloan combination that includes the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan, (i) the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria and attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria of Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Associationas special servicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan prior to June 21,2021, Situs Holdings, LLC as operating advisor of the Emerald Square MallMortgage Loan and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as custodian of theEmerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan, listed on the Exhibit Index are omitted fromthis Annual Report on Form 10-K as they are not required to be included on thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K per Instruction 3 to Item 1122 of Regulation ABbecause they are parties performing activities that address servicing criteriarelating to 5% or less of the assets of the issuing entity; and (ii) theservicer compliance statement of Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank,National Association as special servicer of the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan prior to June 21, 2021, listed on the Exhibit Index is omitted from thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K as it is not required by Item 1123 of Regulation ABto be included on this Annual Report on Form 10-K because it is an unaffiliatedparty that is not a “servicer” that meets the criteria in Item 1108(a)(2)(i)through (iii) of Regulation AB.

**PART I**

**Item 1.  Business.**

Omitted.

**Item 1A.  Risk Factors.**

Omitted.

**Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments.**

None.

**Item 2.  Properties.**

Omitted.

**Item 3.  Legal Proceedings.**

Omitted.

**Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.**

Not applicable.

**PART II**

**Item 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity,Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.**

Omitted.

**Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis ofFinancial Condition and Results of Operations.**

Omitted.

**Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative DisclosuresAbout Market Risk.**

Omitted.

**Item 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.**

Omitted.

**Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements WithAccountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.**

Omitted.

**Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures.**

Omitted.

**Item 9B.  Other Information.**

None.

**PART III**

**Item 10.  Directors, Executive Officers and CorporateGovernance.**

Omitted.

**Item 11.  Executive Compensation.**

Omitted.

**Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain BeneficialOwners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.**

Omitted.

**Item 13.  Certain Relationships and RelatedTransactions, and Director Independence.**

Omitted.

**Item 14.  Principal Accounting Fees and Services.**

Omitted.

**ADDITIONAL DISCLOSURE ITEMS FOR REGULATION AB**

**Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, Significant ObligorFinancial Information.**

The Prince Building Mortgage Loan(Loan Number 1 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of the registrantrelating to the issuing entity filed on November 13, 2012 pursuant to Rule424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item 1101(k)(2)of Regulation AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement.  In accordancewith Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited net operatingincome of the significant obligor was $17,536,902.33 for the twelve-monthperiod ended December 31, 2021.

The Eastview Mall and CommonsMortgage Loan (Loan Number 2 on Annex A-1 of the prospectus supplement of theregistrant relating to the issuing entity filed on November 13, 2012 pursuantto Rule 424(b)(5)) constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of Item1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB as disclosed in the prospectus supplement.  Inaccordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited netoperating income of the significant obligor was $14,136,798.00 for thetwelve-month period ended December 31, 2021.

**Item 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB, Significant EnhancementProvider Financial Information.**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides any external creditenhancement or other support for the certificates within this transaction asdescribed under Item 1114(a) of Regulation AB.

**Item 1115(b) of Regulation AB, Certain DerivativesInstruments (Financial Information).**

No entity or group of affiliated entities provides anyderivative instruments or other support for the certificates within thistransaction as described under Item 1115 of Regulation AB.

**Item 1117 of Regulation AB, Legal Proceedings.**

The registrant knows of no material pending legal proceedinginvolving the trust or any party related to the trust, other than routinelitigation incidental to the duties of those respective parties, and thefollowing, with respect to Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as CertificateAdministrator and as Custodian, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, andWells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator and asCustodian.

Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (“DBTCA”) andDeutsche Bank National Trust Company (“DBNTC”) have been sued byinvestors in civil litigation concerning their roles as trustees of certainresidential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. 

On June 18, 2014, a group of investors, including fundsmanaged by Blackrock Advisors, LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed anaction against DBNTC and DBTCA in New York State Supreme Court alleging thatDBNTC and DBTCA failed to perform purported duties, as trustees for 544private-label RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations andwarranties as to mortgage loans held by the trusts and to enforce breaches byservicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, plaintiffs dismissed the case from NewYork State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S.District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “BlackRock SDNYCase”) and the other in the Superior Court of California, Orange County(the “BlackRock California Case”).  Pursuant to a settlement amongthe parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018, and theBlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.

On September 27, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to acase brought by certain special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SFLimited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in whichthe plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee forall forty-three of the trusts at issue.  On September 27, 2017, plaintiffsfiled a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition toDBNTC.  DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the forty-three trusts atissue.  DBNTC serves as trustee for the other forty-two trusts atissue.  Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation ofthe U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breachof fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of New York’sStreit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith.  However, in thethird amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added tothe case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA Act claims, negligence and grossnegligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of goodfaith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, andplaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.”  OnNovember 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amendedcomplaint.  On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summaryjudgment.  Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with CommerzbankAG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partialsummary judgment.  On October 27, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed asupplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’standing.  On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which itgranted DBNTC and DBTCA’s supplemental motion for summary judgment, granted inpart DBNTC and DBTCA’s initial motion for summary judgment, and deniedplaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.  As a result of thatorder, all of plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice.

On November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to acase brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U.S. DistrictCourt for the Southern District of New York, in which Commerzbank previouslyalleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all fifty of the trusts atissue.  On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaintthat names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC.  DBTCA serves astrustee for one of the fifty trusts at issue.  DBNTC serves as trustee forthe other forty-nine trusts at issue.  Commerzbank’s second amendedcomplaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach offiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of thecovenant of good faith.  However, in the second amended complaint,Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the courtdismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling andservicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach ofthe covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims topreserve any rights on appeal.  The second amended complaint alleges thatDBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollarsin losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in asum certain.  On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to thesecond amended complaint.  On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed amotion for summary judgment.  Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank,jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summaryjudgment.  On February 8, 2022, the court issued an order in which itgranted in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion for summary judgment and deniedplaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment.  As a result of thatorder, many of plaintiffs’ claims and theories were dismissed withprejudice.  Discovery is ongoing.

On December 30, 2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidationand IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as aninvestor in thirty-seven RMBS trusts, filed a summons with notice in theSupreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, against DBNTC andDBTCA as trustees of the trusts.  On May 27, 2016, IKB served itscomplaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty,breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act,violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 ofthe Uniform Commercial Code.  IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liablefor over U.S. $268 million in damages.  On October 5, 2016, DBNTC andDBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed ajoint motion to dismiss.  On January 6, 2017 and June 20, 2017, IKBvoluntarily dismissed with prejudice all claims as to seven trusts.  OnJanuary 27, 2021, the court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’smotion to dismiss.  The court granted the motion to dismiss with respectto IKB’s claims for violations of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9of the Uniform Commercial Code, as well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims forbreach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the TIA. The court denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss.  IKB’s remainingclaims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty toavoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed.  OnMay 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New YorkSupreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, regarding certain aspectsof the court’s order on the motion to dismiss.  That appeal has been fullybriefed.  On May 20, 2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with respectto other aspects of that order.  That appeal is being briefed.  OnJune 2, 2021, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects ofthe court’s order on the motion to dismiss, which the court denied on August 3,2021.  On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to thecomplaint.  On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation,voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additionaltrusts.  On December 29, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation,voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to one additionaltrust.  Discovery is ongoing.

It is DBTCA’s belief that it has no pending legal proceedings(including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed inthe foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to performits duties under the related servicing agreement for this transaction.

U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S.Bank”) and other large financial institutions have been sued in theircapacity as trustee or successor trustee for certain residential mortgagebacked securities (“RMBS”) trusts.  The complaints, primarily filedby investors or investor groups against U.S. Bank and similar institutions,allege the trustees caused losses to investors as a result of alleged failuresby the sponsors, mortgage loan sellers and servicers to comply with thegoverning agreements for these RMBS trusts.  Plaintiffs generally assertcauses of action based upon the trustees’ purported failures to enforcerepurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for alleged breaches ofrepresentations and warranties, notify securityholders of purported events ofdefault allegedly caused by breaches of servicing standards by mortgage loanservicers and abide by a heightened standard of care following alleged eventsof default.  

 

U.S. Bank denies liability and believes that it hasperformed its obligations under the RMBS trusts in good faith, that its actionswere not the cause of losses to investors, that it has meritorious defenses,and it has contested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claimsvigorously.  However, U.S. Bank cannot assure you as to the outcome of anyof the litigation, or the possible impact of these litigations on the trusteeor the RMBS trusts.  

 

On March 9, 2018, a law firm purporting to represent fifteenDelaware statutory trusts (the “DSTs”) that issued securities backed bystudent loans (the “Student Loans”) filed a lawsuit in the DelawareCourt of Chancery against U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”)in its capacities as indenture trustee and successor special servicer, andthree other institutions in their respective transaction capacities, withrespect to the DSTs and the Student Loans.  This lawsuit is captioned NationalCollegiate Student Loan Master Trust I v. U.S. Bank National Ass’n, C.A.No. 2018-0167-JRS (Del. Ch.) (the “NCMSLT Action”).  The complaint,as amended on June 15, 2018, alleged that the DSTs have been harmed as a resultof purported misconduct or omissions by the defendants concerningadministration of the trusts and special servicing of the Student Loans. Since the filing of the NCMSLT Action, certain Student Loan borrowers have madeassertions against U.S. Bank concerning special servicing that appear to bebased on certain allegations made on behalf of the DSTs in the NCMSLT Action.

 

U.S. Bank has filed a motion seeking dismissal of theoperative complaint in its entirety with prejudice pursuant to Chancery CourtRules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) or, in the alternative, a stay of the case whileother prior filed disputes involving the DSTs and the Student Loans arelitigated.  On November 7, 2018, the Court ruled that the case should bestayed in its entirety pending resolution of the first-filed cases.  OnJanuary 21, 2020, the Court entered an order consolidating for pretrialpurposes the NCMSLT Action and three other lawsuits pending in the DelawareCourt of Chancery concerning the DSTs and the Student Loans, which remainspending.  

 

U.S. Bank denies liability in the NCMSLT Action and believesit has performed its obligations as indenture trustee and special servicer ingood faith and in compliance in all material respects with the terms of theagreements governing the DSTs and that it has meritorious defenses.  Ithas contested and intends to continue contesting the plaintiffs’ claimsvigorously.

 

In December 2014, Phoenix LightSF Limited and certain related entities and the National Credit UnionAdministration (“NCUA”) filed complaints in the United States DistrictCourt for the Southern District of New York against Wells Fargo Bank, allegingclaims against Wells Fargo Bank in its capacity as trustee for a number of residentialmortgage-backed securities trusts.  Complaints raising similar allegationshave been filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York and byIKB International and IKB Deutsche Industriebank in New York state court. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as trustee,caused losses to investors, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon,among other things, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforcerepurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches ofrepresentations and warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default,and abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Wells Fargo Bank previously settled two class action lawsuits with similarallegations that were filed in November 2014 and December 2016 by institutionalinvestors in the Southern District of New York and New York state court,respectively.  In addition, Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC havefiled complaints in New York state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., astrustee, failed to take appropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgageloan documentation.  In March 2021, the Company entered into an agreementto resolve the case filed by the NCUA.

 

In addition to the foregoingcases, in August 2014 and August 2015 Nomura Credit & Capital Inc. (“Nomura”)and Natixis Real Estate Holdings, LLC (“Natixis”) filed a total of seventhird-party complaints against Wells Fargo Bank in New York state court. In the underlying first-party actions, Nomura and Natixis have been suedfor alleged breaches of representations and warranties made in connection withresidential mortgage-backed securities sponsored by them.  In thethird-party actions, Nomura and Natixis allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as masterservicer, primary servicer or securities administrator, failed to notify Nomuraand Natixis of their own breaches, failed to properly oversee the primaryservicers, and failed to adhere to accepted servicing practices.  Natixisadditionally alleges that Wells Fargo Bank failed to perform default oversightduties.  Wells Fargo Bank has asserted counterclaims alleging that Nomuraand Natixis failed to provide Wells Fargo Bank notice of their representationand warranty breaches.

With respect to each of the foregoing litigations, WellsFargo Bank believes plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and intends to contestthe claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of thelitigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank orthe related RMBS trusts.

**Item 1119 of Regulation AB, Affiliations and CertainRelationships and Related Transactions.**

The information regarding this Item has been previouslyprovided in a prospectus supplement of the Registrant relating to the issuingentity filed on November 13, 2012 pursuant to Rule 424(b)(5).

**Item 1122 of Regulation AB, Compliance with ApplicableServicing Criteria.**

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the mortgage loans are attachedhereto under Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as ScheduleII to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement incorporated by reference as Exhibit4.1 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K is a chart identifying the entitiesparticipating in a servicing function for the transaction responsible for eachapplicable servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d).

The reports on assessments of compliance with the servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and related attestation reports on suchassessments of compliance with respect to the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan, which is being serviced and administered pursuant to the pooling andservicing agreement for the COMM 2012-CCRE3 Transaction, are attached heretounder Item 15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Attached as Schedule II tothe pooling and servicing agreement for the COMM 2012-CCRE3 Transactionincorporated by reference as Exhibit 4.2 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K isa chart identifying the entities participating in a servicing function for theCOMM 2012-CCRE3 Transaction responsible for each applicable servicing criteriaset forth in Item 1122(d).

**Item 1123 of Regulation AB, Servicer Compliance Statement.**

The servicer compliance statements are attached as Exhibitsto this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

**PART IV**

**Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules**

(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part of thisAnnual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Not applicable

(2) Not applicable

(3) See below

4.1          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of November 1,2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 4 to the registrant’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed on November 13, 2012 under Commission File No. 333-172143-07 andincorporated by reference herein).

4.2          Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of October 1,2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, andSitus Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed on November 21, 2012 underCommission File No. 333-172143-06 and incorporated by reference herein).

31           Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

33           Reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

33.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

33.2        Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer

33.3        U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (Omitted.  See ExplanatoryNotes.)

33.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

33.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

33.6        Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor

33.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

33.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

33.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

33.10      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.11      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)

33.12      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan(Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.13      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.14      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.15      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.16      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.17      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.18      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.2)

33.19      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Eastview Mall and CommonsMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.20      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.5)

33.21      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.6)

33.22      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

33.23      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 33.9)

33.24      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.1)

33.25      Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan prior to June 21, 2021(Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.26      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicerof the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan on and after June 21, 2021

33.27      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.28      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian of the Emerald Square MallMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.29      Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

33.30      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 33.7)

34           Attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities.

34.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

34.2        Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer

34.3        U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee (Omitted.  See ExplanatoryNotes.)

34.4        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

34.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian

34.6        Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor

34.7        CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant

34.8        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

34.9        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021

34.10      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.11      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)

34.12      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan(Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.13      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.14      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.15      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.16      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.17      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.18      Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.2)

34.19      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Eastview Mall and CommonsMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.20      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCustodian of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.5)

34.21      Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as OperatingAdvisor of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.6)

34.22      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

34.23      Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian on and after November 1,2021 (see Exhibit 34.9)

34.24      Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.1)

34.25      Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan prior to June 21, 2021(Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.26      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicerof the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan on and after June 21, 2021

34.27      U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee of the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.28      Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian of the Emerald Square MallMortgage Loan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.29      Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor of the Emerald Square Mall MortgageLoan (Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

34.30      CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing FunctionParticipant of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 34.7)

35           Servicer compliance statements.

35.1        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as MasterServicer

35.2        Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer

35.3        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, asCertificate Administrator

35.4        Computershare Trust Company, National Association,as Servicing Function Participant for the Certificate Administrator on andafter November 1, 2021

35.5        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.6        Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Prince Building Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)

35.7        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.8        Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicerof the Eastview Mall and Commons Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.2)

35.9        Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as PrimaryServicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan (see Exhibit 35.1)

35.10      Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer of the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan prior to June 21, 2021(Omitted.  See Explanatory Notes.)

35.11      KeyBank National Association, as Special Servicerof the Emerald Square Mall Mortgage Loan on and after June 21, 2021

99.1         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of November13, 2012, between German American Capital Corporation and Deutsche Mortgage& Asset Receiving Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant’sCurrent Report on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2012 under Commission File No.333-172143-07 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.2         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of November13, 2012, between Cantor Commercial Real Estate Lending, L.P. and DeutscheMortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.3 to theregistrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2012 underCommission File No. 333-172143-07 and incorporated by reference herein)

99.3         Mortgage Loan Purchase Agreement, dated as of November13, 2012, between KeyBank National Association and Deutsche Mortgage &Asset Receiving Corporation (filed as Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant’s CurrentReport on Form 8-K filed on November 13, 2012 under Commission File No.333-172143-07 and incorporated by reference herein)

(b)   The exhibits required to be filed by theRegistrant pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed above.

(c)    Not Applicable.

 

**SIGNATURES**

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report tobe signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation(Depositor)

/s/ HelaineM. Kaplan

Helaine M.Kaplan, President

(senior officer in charge ofsecuritization of the depositor)

Date: March 21, 2022

/s/ MattSmith

Matt Smith, Director

Date: March 21, 2022