alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTER

U. S. Office of Personnel Management

Number: P-97-09 Date: August 19, 1997

SUBJECT: REVISION OF HEALTH BENEFITS OPEN SEASON FILE FORMAT

This Payroll Office Letter applies to those offices which use the floppy diskette provided

by the Office of Personnel Management for updating health benefits withholding and

contribution rates. One of the options available to payroll offices for receiving the health

benefit new year rates is via a file or a floppy disk (see Payroll Office Letter #96-09,

dated November 8, 1996, page 1).

This letter provides advance information that the file format for the calender year 1998

Health Benefits Open Season Enrollment will change. We have added four new fields; a

phone number, phone extension, fax number and an e-mail address.

The additional data fields may impact the computer programs your office uses to load

health benefits withholding and contribution rates. Attached are layouts of the old and

the new format. You should contact your computer operations center to determine

what, if any, program changes are required.

If you have any questions on this, please contact Anita West on (202) 606-0666 or via

email, finance@opm.gov. 

 Robert A. Yuran, Chief

 Financial Policy Staff

 Retirement and Insurance Service
Theodore D. Schade 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

GREAT BASIN UNIFIED AIR 

~ POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT 

157 Short Street, Bishop, California 93514-3537 

760-872-8211 Fax: 760-872-6109 

8/0 #120905-04 

September 5, 2012 

I HEREBY CERTIFY that at a regular meeting of the Great Basin Unified Air Pollution Control 

District Governing Board held in the Town of Mammoth Lakes Council Chambers in 

Mammoth Lakes, California on September 5, 2012 an order was duly made and entered as 

follows: 

AGENDA ITEM #4: ADOPTION OF PROPOSED RULE 221 

A motion was made by Veatch and seconded by Eastman approving Resolution 2012-01 , 

making findings of facts and conclusions of law, and adopting District Rule 221: Prevention 

of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permit Requirements for New Major Facilities or Major 

Modifications in Attainment or Unclassifiable Areas. 

Ayes: Board Members- Johnston, Eastman, Hansen, Arcularius, Veatch, Sweeney 

Noes: 0 

Abstain: 0 

Absent: Board Members - Cervantes 

Motion carried 6/0 and so ordered. 

ATTEST: 

Tori DeHaven, Clerk of the Board
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3661 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3661

  To terminate the independent third-party program for sectors of the 
 Northeast Multispecies Fishery unless the program is fully funded by 
   the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2015

  Mr. Guinta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To terminate the independent third-party program for sectors of the 
 Northeast Multispecies Fishery unless the program is fully funded by 
   the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``New England Fishermen Preservation 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INDEPENDENT THIRD-PARTY MONITORING.

    (a) In General.--Except as provided in subsection (b), the 
Secretary of Commerce shall not require sectors of the Northeast 
Multispecies Fishery to comply with the independent third-party 
monitoring program required by section 648.87 of title 50, Code of 
Federal Regulations (or similar successor regulation).
    (b) Exception.--The Secretary of Commerce may require sectors of 
the Northeast Multispecies Fishery to comply with the independent 
third-party monitoring program required by section 648.87 of title 50, 
Code of Federal Regulations (or similar successor regulation), if the 
Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
fully funds the program with funds appropriated for the Administration.
                                 <all>
```
|Exhibit 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geovic Mining Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John E. Sherborne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|
|





| | /s/ John E. SherborneJohn E. Sherborne 
Chief Executive Officer
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: August 27, 2007
|---------------------



---
David W. Webster THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT 251 Causeway Street, Suite 800, Boston, MA 02114-2136 (617) 626-1200 FAX: (617) 626-1240

July 9, 2012
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region I 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 Boston, MA 02109-39 1 2

RE: CZM Federal Consistency Review ofVessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (SVGP); Statewide.

Dea r Mr. Webster: The Massachusetts Office of Coastal Zone Management (CZM) is currendy reviewing your proposal for a NPDES Vessel General Permit (VGP) and Small Vessel General Permit (SVGP) to ensure consistency with CZM enforceable program policies. Our formal review began on December 22, 2011 and a consistency determination would ordinarily be issued no later than February 22, 2012. However, as per the Coastal Zone Management Act Federal Consistency Regulations at 15 CFR 930.41(b) and 310 CMR 21.06(3)(e), CZM cannot complete its review and issue a decision until all applica ble licenses, permits, certifications and other authorizations have been issued. Our records indicate that the MassDEP Section 401 Water Quality Certification for the proposed permit has not yet been issued
. The Coastal Zone Management Act Federal Consistency Regulations at 15 CFR 930.41(b) allow for a stay in the sixty day review period, ifmutually agreed upon by both the applicant and the state agency. The permit review was previously extended to March 8, 2012 and July 16, 2012. In order to facilitate the required 401 Water Quality Certification, we propose a second extension of the review period until October 15, 2012. CZM will need copies and documentation of all the required final MassDEP authorizations prior to the expiration of the stay period. Please indicate your agreement to this schedule by signing below and returning this letter to my attention
. 

### Ifyou have questions about the federal consistency review process, please contact me at the above address or (617) 626- 1050. Ifyou have questions about the technical review of this project, please contact Todd Callaghan at (617) 626-1233.

DEVAL L. PATRICK GOVERNOR TIMOTHY P. MURRAY LI EUTENANT GOVER NOR RICHARD K. SUWVAN JR. SECRETARY BRUCE K. CAR U SLE DIR ECTOR www.mass.gow czmSincerely,

Robert 

### L. Boeri Project Review Coordinator CZM# 8999, 9000 

# Q-«N4v1 tr:Jk

Agreed to by applicant David Webster U.S. EPA
Cc: John Nagle, USEPA Bryant Fi.rrnin, DEP Worcester Todd Callaghan, CZM
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Transtrend DTP Enhanced FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the SecuritiesExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis,Chief Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, themanager of ML Transtrend DTP Enhanced FuturesAccess LLC, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:**

 

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2008                  |                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                          |                  |
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |
|                                               |                       |  |

 

----
[No. 35566.

Department One.

April 13, 1961.]

#### Robert L. Hontz, *Appellant,*v. Denny A. White *et al., Respondents.*
      ***

*Greive & Law*and *Roderick D. Dimoff,*for appellant.

*Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester*and *Meade Emory,*for respondents.

Reported in 361 P. (2d) 168.

Per Curiam.

A prior appeal was dismissed because there was then no final judgment. *Hontz v. White,*56 Wn. (2d) 538, 348 P. (2d) 420. The correctness of the order dismissing appellant’s complaint is now properly here by appeal.

The respondent husband was the favored driver approaching an intersection from the appellant’s right. The evidence is uncontradicted that neither the appellant nor his passenger saw the respondents’ car before the collision. Consequently, neither of them could have been deceived. *111
      *Kerlik v. Jerke,*56 Wn. (2d) 575, 354 P. (2d) 702; *King v. Molthan,*54 Wn. (2d) 115, 338 P. (2d) 338.

There was no dispute as to any material fact. Appellant’s contributory negligence bars recovery.

Respondents are awarded costs on both appeals except that there shall be no duplicate taxation of items for either the briefs or the record.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3600 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3600

 To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the instances in which 
   official time may be granted to employees of the Internal Revenue 
                    Service, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 24, 2015

Mr. Holding (for himself and Mr. Roskam) introduced the following bill; 
 which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 5, United States Code, to limit the instances in which 
   official time may be granted to employees of the Internal Revenue 
                    Service, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON OFFICIAL TIME FOR INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 
              EMPLOYEES.

    (a) In General.--Section 7131 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(e) The authority provided under subsection (d) shall not be 
available to the Internal Revenue Service.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Subsection (d) of section 7131 of title 
5, United States Code, is amended by inserting ``and subsection (e)'' 
after ``preceding subsections''.
    (c) Application.--The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) 
shall apply to any collective bargaining agreement entered into after 
the date of enactment of this section.
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3619 

To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia as Rock Creek 

National Park. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Ms. NORTON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To redesignate Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia 

as Rock Creek National Park. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Rock Creek National 

5 Park Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REDESIGNATION OF ROCK CREEK PARK AS ROCK 

7 CREEK NATIONAL PARK. 

8 (a) REDESIGNATION.—In recognition of its nationally 

9 significant natural, cultural, and historical resources, and 

10 important recreational opportunities, Rock Creek Park in 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3619 IH

1 the District of Columbia, established by the Act of Sep2 tember 27, 1890 (26 Stat. 492), is redesignated as ‘‘Rock 

3 Creek National Park’’. 

4 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.—Title 40, United 

5 States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in section 8104(b), by striking ‘‘Rock Creek 

7 Park’’ and inserting ‘‘Rock Creek National Park’’; 

8 and 

9 (2) in section 8501(a)(3)(B), by striking ‘‘Rock 

10 Creek Park’’ and inserting ‘‘Rock Creek National 

11 Park’’. 

12 (c) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

13 regulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

14 States to Rock Creek Park in the District of Columbia 

15 is deemed to be a reference to Rock Creek National Park. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
FINAL WEST VIRGINIA STATE IMPLEMENTATION PLAN REVISION FOR CLEAN AIR ACT SECTION 110(A)(2)(A)-(M) REQUIREMENTS
FOR OZONE AND FINE PARTICULATES

RESPONSE TO COMMENTS

On August 21, 2009, the Division of Air Qua lity (DAQ) commenced a thirty day public comment period to accept written comments and/or a written request for a public hearing on a proposed revision to the State Implementation Plan which demonstrates that West Virginia has adequate resources and authority to implement the 2006 PM 2.5 NAAQS and the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Additionally in this plan revision, the state is supplementing its existing Section 110(a)(2)(A)-(M) infrastructure SIP for the 1997 PM 2.5 and 8-hour ozone NAAQS, only with respect to the enforcement authority requirements under CAA Section 110(a)(2)(C).

Written comments were accepted through 6:00 PM on Monday, September 21, 2009. No commenter submitted written comments regarding th e proposed implementation plan revision, and no person requested a public hearing. Consequentl y, DAQ published in the West Virginia Register on September 25, 2009, a public notice announcing that a public hearing will not be held.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number 18 – 103 Date: 09-12-2018 

Subject: FERS Unused Sick Leave and the 1.1% Annuity Formula 

Background 

Section 1901 of The “National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010”, Public 

Law 111-84 (codified at 5 U.S.C. § 8415(m)(2)) allows unused sick leave under a formal 

leave system to be credited in the computation of benefits under FERS. The statute 

prohibits the use of unused sick leave to establish title to annuity or in the calculation of 

average salary. Therefore, if title to an annuity is already established based on age and 

creditable service, unused sick leave is added to the length of service for computation 

purposes. 

Discussion 

The question has come up regarding whether a retiree who: 

• Is at least age 62, with 

• Less than 20 years of actual service, but 

• With enough unused sick leave that, when added to other service performed, 

equals 20 or more years of service for computation purposes, 

is eligible to receive the 1.1% FERS formula in the computation of the annuity. The 

confusion seems to stem from the erroneous assumption that the 1.1% formula is a type 

of immediate retirement for which an employee would need to meet eligibility 

requirements. 

The eligibility requirements for an immediate annuity are codified at 5 U.S.C. § 8412. At 

age 62, an employee needs just 5 years of creditable FERS service to retire. Once title to 

annuity is established, we turn to the correct calculation method. 

Computation of FERS annuity is codified at 5 U.S.C. § 8415. As a general rule, FERS 

annuities are calculated by multiplying the high-3 average pay by total service and 

multiplying that figure by 1%. However, for an employee eligible for an immediate 

annuity after becoming 62 years of age and completing 20 years of service, the annuity is 

calculated by multiplying the high-3 average pay by total service and multiplying that 

figure by 1.1%, which results in a higher annuity benefit. 
 

 

 

 

Because 5 U.S.C. §8415(m)(2) clearly provides that a retiree is entitled to service credit 

for unused sick leave for the purposes of calculating the immediate annuity, any unused 

sick leave is added to the service total and used to calculate the annuity. This means that 

a retiree who is at least age 62, whose actual service is less than 20 years, but increases to 

at least 20 years with the addition of unused sick leave credit, will have their annuity 

computed using the 1.1% formula. 

Kenneth J. Zawodny, Jr. 

Associate Director 

Retirement Services 

Retirement Services 

Quality Benefits for the Federal Family 

2
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6114 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6114

**Commission Decision of 24/02/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6114 - 3i GROUP / ONEMED) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 24.02.2011

SG-Greffe(2011) D/2851

PUBLIC VERSION C(2011) 1326 final

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6114 - 3i GROUP/ ONEMED Notification of 20/01/2011 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 29, 29/01/2011, p. 26

1. On 20/01/2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which3i Group (United Kingdom) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of OneMed Group Oy ("OneMed", Finland) by way of purchase of shares.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- 3i Group: an international investor focused on private equity, infrastructure and debt management, investing in Europe, Asia and North America;

- OneMed: a wholesaler focusing on selling medical consumables to private and public health care providers in Sweden, Finland, Poland, Denmark, Norway and the Baltic countries.

2. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

3. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (Signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   The undersigned, Henry Fong, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Techs Loanstar, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Techs Loanstar, Inc. for the period ended January 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Techs Loanstar, Inc.  Dated: March 17, 2011  /s/ Henry Fong
Name: Henry Fong
Title: President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
(Principal Executive Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Techs Loanstar, Inc. and will be retained by Techs Loanstar, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### COBB v. STATE.

No. 20353.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 5, 1939.

Wallace B. Moore, of. Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for misdemeanor theft; the punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. The information is sufficient to charge the offense, and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 05-301 Date: March 7, 2005 

Subject: FEHBP Cost Factor for the Second Quarter of FY 2005 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) 

for the second quarter of FY 2005. A quarterly cost factor will also be provided to you near the end 

of the third quarter of the Fiscal Year. The annual imputed cost factors for all civilian benefit 

programs will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2005. 

The imputed cost factor for the second quarter of FY 2005 related to the FEHB is $1,215. Thus, the 

FY 2005 year-to-date imputed cost factor related to the FEHB is: 

1st Quarter $1,195

2nd Quarter $1,215

Year-to-date $2,410

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. You may of course call us on 202-606-0606. 

 

Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

Financial Policy Group 

Center for Financial Services