alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-906 Date: May 2, 2002 

Subject: Additional Information about the May 15 Federal Long Term Care 

Insurance Program Satellite Broadcast 

This Benefits Administration Letter is a follow-up to BAL 02-905, which announced that on May 

15, OPM will sponsor the second of three satellite broadcasts on the Federal Long Term Care 

Insurance Program. The broadcast will be held from 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight 

Time. We’ve attached a flyer (in Word and PDF formats) that you can use to advertise the 

broadcast if you will be making it available to employees in your agency. 

If you have not already done so, we encourage you to read BAL 02-905 and the Frequently Asked 

Questions About OPM Satellite Broadcasts. Both documents are available at 

http://www.opm.gov/asd/htm/2002/02-905.htm.

Satellite Coordinates: 

C-Band: Telstar 6, Transponder 1 Ku-Band: Telstar 6, Transponder 20 

Orbital Position: 93 Degrees West Orbital Position: 93 Degrees West 

Downlink Frequency: 3720 mHz Downlink Frequency: 12060 mHz 

Polarity: Vertical Polarity: Horizontal 

There will be a test period from Noon to 12:30 p.m. EDT. 

Videotapes:

One videotape of the broadcast will be sent free of charge to each agency implementation 

coordinator. Additional tapes may be ordered by calling In Focus Productions at (703) 834-1470, 

extension 0. The cost per tape is $10, and payment may be made by credit card. Tapes will be sent 

approximately two weeks after the broadcast. 
2

We appreciate your interest in these satellite broadcasts and your efforts to make them available 

to your employees. If you have questions about the broadcast that are not addressed in this BAL, 

BAL 02-905, or the FAQs on satellite broadcasts, please contact Holly Schumann at (202) 606-

0399 or hbschuma@opm.gov. And don’t forget to mark your calendar for our third and final 

satellite broadcast on July 17, also from 12:30 p.m. to 1:30 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time! 

 Frank D. Titus 

 Assistant Director 

 for Long Term Care 

Attachments 

Word

PDF
#### Francke, Appellant, v. City of West Bend, Respondent.

*January 13*

February 7, *1961.*

*575For the appellant there was a brief by *Marth & Marth*of West Bend, and oral argument by *William J. Marth.*

For the respondent there was a brief by *O’Meara & O’Meara*of West Bend, and oral argument by *Stephen M. O’Meara.*

*576Broadfoot, J.

Apparently the plaintiff argued before the circuit court that the city was engaged in a proprietary function when maintaining a drain or sewer and that it would be liable for a nuisance created and maintained when engaged in such proprietary capacity. The only allegation in the complaint as to the activity of the employees of the city just prior to the time of the accident is that they were engaged in removing an obstruction from within a municipal storm sewer or drain and that plaintiff stepped into it while crossing a street in said city.

It is a matter of common knowledge, and we take judicial notice thereof, that storm sewers and the drains or catch basins in connection therewith are constructed and maintained for the purpose of disposing of surface water upon streets and highways. Maintenance of streets is a governmental function. Plaintiff was injured while crossing the highway and therefore the relationship of governor and governed existed at the time of plaintiff’s injury. Municipal corporations are not liable for nuisances when the relationship of governor and governed exists between it and the injured person. *Smith v. Jefferson,*8 Wis. (2d) 378, 99 N. W. (2d) 119; *Laffey v. Milwaukee,*4 Wis. (2d) 111, 89 N. W. (2d) 801; *Champeau v. Little Chute,*275 Wis. 257, 81 N. W. (2d) 562; *Flamingo v. Waukesha,*262 Wis. 219, 55 N. W. (2d) 24.

The trial court was correct in its determination on that particular issue. Plowever, upon the argument before this court the suggestion was made that plaintiff alleged a cause of action under the provisions of sec. 81.15, Stats., because the open manhole or drain constituted a defect in the highway. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff on March 6, 1959, duly filed with and notified the defendant city of his claim for damages as stated in the complaint. Plaintiff stated that the notice referred to in the complaint was sufficient to comply with the statutory notice required by *577sec. 81.15. A copy of the notice was not attached to the complaint and therefore does not appear in the record on file with this court and we are unable to pass upon the sufficiency thereof.

When the sufficiency of a complaint is challenged by a demurrer the most-liberal interpretation possible must be given to the allegations of fact therein. Every reasonable inference and presumption is to be made in favor of it and if, after applying that test, any fact is established upon which plaintiff can recover, a demurrer thereto should be overruled. *Cargill Coal Co. v. Valentine,*275 Wis. 598, 82 N. W. (2d) 883; *Milwaukee v.*Hurless, 7 Wis. (2d) 608, 97 N. W. (2d) 399.

Upon remand of the record if the notice does not comply with the statute, the defendant can raise the issue by its answer.

*By the Court.*— Order reversed.
#                                                     Cade T  Abbott                                            

### 

## Contact

abbottct@ornl.gov
#### ROGERS v. STATE.

No. 16627.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1934.

A. R. Eidson, of Hamilton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for the sale of intoxicating liquor, punishment being assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

The indictment is in proper form. No statement of facts or bills of exception are found in the record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
United States Office of Personnel Management

Retirement Services

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 23-106 Date: October 13, 2023 

Subject: Revised Retirement Coverage Determination Tables

This Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) provides updates to the retirement coverage 

determination tables published in CSRS and FERS Handbook, Chapter 10 – Coverage

(07/2017). These revised retirement coverage determination tables will be included in 

the next publication of Chapter 10 – Coverage. The revised retirement coverage 

determination tables included in this BAL replace the previously published tables in 

BAL 14-107, Federal Employees Retirement System – Further Revised Annuity Employees 

(FERS-FRAE) Coverage Determination Guidance, and CSRS and FERS Handbook, Chapter 

10 – Coverage (07/2017 publication date). Agencies should begin using the revised 

retirement coverage determination tables for making coverage determinations for first

hires, transfers/conversions, and rehires. 

Background

In 2014, new retirement coverage determination tables were published in BAL 14-107, 

Federal Employees Retirement System – Further Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE) 

Coverage Determination Guidance, to include coverage determinations under the Federal 

Employees Retirement System – Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-RAE) and Federal 

Employees Retirement System – Further Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE). 

These tables were later included in the July 2017 publication of the CSRS and FERS 

Handbook, Chapter 10 – Coverage. 
Benefits Administration Letter 23-106

2 

Revised Coverage Determination Tables

Based on agency feedback, it was determined that the new coverage determination 

tables included duplicate steps for the FERS-RAE and FERS-FRAE retirement plans, and 

there was no mechanism to account for an employee moving from a FERS covered 

position to a position that is excluded from FERS by law and therefore not subject to 

continuity of coverage rules. The revised tables account for both of these changes 

resulting in coverage determination tables with fewer steps and a clearer 

determination for individuals who move from a FERS covered position into a position 

excluded from FERS by law.

The revised retirement coverage determination tables for first hires, 

transfers/conversions, and rehires are provided in Appendix A of this BAL. The revised 

tables should be reproduced locally by agencies for use by Human Resources 

professionals. 

Additional Information

For questions regarding the information in this BAL, please contact the Benefits 

Officers Development and Outreach group at benefits@opm.gov or call (202) 606-0788. 

Sincerely,

Margaret Pearson

Associate Director

Retirement Services

Encl.:

1. Appendix A, Retirement Coverage Determination Tables
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 17-1600

___________________________

Melissa Jane Lee

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Missouri - Springfield

____________

 Submitted: November 27, 2017

 Filed: December 1, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Melissa Lee appeals the district court’s adverse grant of summary judgment

1

in her action claiming employment discrimination and retaliation. Having reviewed

The Honorable Brian C. Wimes, United States District Judge for the Western 1

District of Missouri.
the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude thatsummary judgment

was properly granted for the reasons stated in the district court’s order, see Peterson

v. Kopp, 754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review); and that the district

court did not err in not recusing itself sua sponte, see United States v. Rubashkin, 655

F.3d 849, 858 (8th Cir. 2011) (plain error review). 

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 361 Engrossed in House (EH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 361

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under 
    existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security 
   Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding for 
   enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass 
                       prophylaxis capabilities.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Medical Preparedness Allowable Use 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF CERTAIN HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT FUNDS FOR ENHANCING 
              MEDICAL PREPAREDNESS, MEDICAL SURGE CAPACITY, AND MASS 
              PROPHYLAXIS CAPABILITIES.

    Section 2008 of the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (6 U.S.C. 609) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by redesignating paragraphs (10) 
        through (13) as paragraphs (11) through (14), respectively, and 
        by inserting after paragraph (9) the following:
            ``(10) enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge 
        capacity, and mass prophylaxis capabilities, including the 
        development and maintenance of an initial pharmaceutical 
        stockpile, including medical kits, and diagnostics sufficient 
        to protect first responders, their families, immediate victims, 
        and vulnerable populations from a chemical or biological 
        event;''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(3)(B), by striking ``(a)(10)'' and 
        inserting ``(a)(11)''.

            Passed the House of Representatives February 2, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 361

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002 to codify authority under 
    existing grant guidance authorizing use of Urban Area Security 
   Initiative and State Homeland Security Grant Program funding for 
   enhancing medical preparedness, medical surge capacity, and mass 
                       prophylaxis capabilities.
```
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respectof the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo CommercialMortgage Trust 2012-LC5 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge,all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to beprovided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included inthe Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except asotherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliancedescribed in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial RealEstate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, asSpecial Servicer for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank TrustCompany Americas, as Trustee for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan,CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing FunctionParticipant for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan, and National Tax Search,LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan.

 

 

 

Dated: March 19,2020

 

 

/s/ AnthonySfarra

 

 

President

(senior officerin charge of securitization of the depositor)
MEMORANDUM

To: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket id: OAR-2013-0602

From: Region 5, EPA

Subject: 10/7/14, Conference Call Regarding Proposed Carbon Plan for Existing Power Plants

Summary: A conference call was held between EPA and attendees from Wisconsin on October 

7, 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants. The following list 

of questions was submitted for discussion by the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources. 

Attendees may have included: Breuer, Delanie - PSC; Detmer, Kenneth - PSC; Vedvik, 

Alexander - PSC; Neumeyer, Donald G - PSC; Bizot, David A - DNR; Dickens, Angela F -

DNR; Adamantiades, Mikhail; Cain, Alexis; newman, erin
Questions emailed prior to the call are below: 

1) Are CO2 emissions from new NGCC counted against the emission limitation for existing 

EGUs? We would like confirmation that the proposed rule does not create this intent or 

requirement in meeting either an emission rate or mass cap limit.

This conclusion is based on discussion in the proposed rule preamble starting on pages 34876 

and 34923 of the federal register. EPA appears to be stating in these discussions that new 

NGCC can be used towards compliance, but emissions are not regulated or required to be 

included in any way under the proposed existing EGU limit.

2) How can new NGCC units be used towards compliance of the existing EGU 

requirement? Has EPA considered what would be approvable in a state plan? It seems 

there are several options that result in various levels of stringency:

a) Allow new NGCCs to be built without emissions being included under the existing EGU 

requirement. This seems to be what the rule preamble is describing as a direct outcome 

of the proposed rule structure. [We would like to confirm this]

b) Allow new NGCC emissions and MWh to be included in calculating the emission rate for 

the existing EGU system. 

c) Allow new NGCC emissions to be excluded from a mass cap.

d) Allow emission reductions in excess of the new NGCC NSPS limit to count towards 

compliance with the existing EGU emission rate or mass cap limits.

3) Potential question on calculating mass caps. Is 2012 renewable and nuclear MWh 

included in the calculation? The proposed rule language appears to direct states to model 

the EGU system and apply the emission limitation to the grown MWh generated by the fossil 

fuel fleet (affected units). However, Wisconsin believes that the 2012 MWh of renewable 

and nuclear energy that was used in determining the emission limit must also be included in 

the calculation. Otherwise the result is to make the requirement more stringent under a mass 

cap.
Featured           Riding through: Researchers enhance reliability of electric vehicle charging          

Featured           City without walls: Buildings, energy, psychology overlap for researcher Frank Li         

Featured           New method monitors grid stability with hydropower project signals         

# Energy Systems Integration & Controls

## Advancing a secure and resilient power grid with innovative systems integration and controls 

The Energy Systems Integration & Controls Section advances energy systems integration and controls to improve the efficiency and resiliency of systems-of-systems architectures. The section’s research is focused in five groups.

The Power Systems Resilience Group conducts transformational research and development for energy security and resilience through advancement of modeling, simulation, and real-time monitoring of the electric grid.

The Grid Components and Controls Group designs, develops, and implements advanced control systems (e.g. microgrids, protection and controls) and integration of novel energy system components.

The Power Electronics Systems Integration Group designs, develops and deploys power electronics for grid-connected systems through packaging, magnetics, hardware prototyping, system architecture and integration (e.g. power electronics-based substation), and real-time power electronics systems simulation.

The Grid Communications and Security Group conducts research, development, testing and evaluation of modern communication devices and systems for energy applications.

The Grid-interactive Control Group designs, develops, and deploys advanced control algorithms and methods for building energy efficiency and grid connectivity.

### Contact

YaromPolsky

polskyy@ornl.gov

Grid Research Integration and Deployment Center
# Institute for Functional Imaging of Materials 

The ORNL **Institute for Functional Imaging of Materials (IFIM)** is being formed with the specific objective of catalyzing advances in imaging technologies integrated with deep data. The Institute will be a leader in fostering the emerging synergy between imaging-related areas and computational sciences. IFIM will bring together teams with expertise in imaging instrumentation, fundamentals in physical and chemical imaging processes, and data analytics, integrating ORNL core strengths and competencies in imaging and associated technologies. Its members will be comprised from multiple ORNL organizations, reflecting the intrinsically multidisciplinary nature of next-generation imaging sciences. The IFIM will revolutionize our ability to understand phenomena and processes in broad areas of science--physics, chemistry, materials sciences, life and environmental sciences and associated technology areas.

Specifically, IFIM will focus on addressing existing technical barriers to develop revolutionary capabilities in imaging technologies to allow applications to broad areas of science and technology at ORNL, including:
                      - Development of next generation imaging technologies, including simultaneous multidimensional modalities of imaging, in situ and in operando imaging, dynamic imaging, among others.
                      - Discovery and application of new data approaches to extract relevant information from multidimensional data sets at different resolutions and information contents in an unbiased and quantitative manner.
                      - Visualization and analysis for complete and consistent interpretation of images obtained for the same material but by different techniques (with differing spatial resolution and data quality).
                      - Creation of comprehensive frameworks for comparing imaging data to macroscopic functionalities and predictive theories on the level of microscopic degrees of freedom.
                      - Enabling imaging technologies to be applied to new types of materials under real-world conditions and science- and application-driven problems

The IFIM will position ORNL to be a world-leading center for imaging materials and processes across atomic to mesoscales. The initial thrusts areas will include existing strengths in electron/atom probe and scanning probe microscopy imaging, mass spectrometry and optical imaging, neutron and X-ray imaging, and computational imaging and data analytics. While the IFIM is rooted in core capabilities in physical and computational sciences, IFIM will enable new capabilities across broad areas of ORNL’s science and technology portfolios.
EXHIBIT
32.1


WRITTEN
STATEMENT


PURSUANT
TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with Quarterly Report of Lihua International, Inc. and its
subsidiaries (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), the undersigned, Jianhua Zhu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b) or
15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:
      August 12, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Jianhua ZhuName: 
      Jianhua ZhuTitle: 
        Chief Executive
Officer