alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit








AMENDMENT No. 4 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT No. 4 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 3”), is entered into as of August 3, 2017 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda company (the “Company”), and Manoj K. Gupta (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a certain Employment Agreement dated as of March 27, 2012, an Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated as of February 26, 2015, an Amendment No. 2 to Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2016, and an Amendment No. 3 to Employment Agreement dated as of March 1, 2017 (collectively, the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, in consideration of the mutual agreements set forth below and for other good and valuable consideration given, by each party to this Amendment No. 4 to the other, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Company and Executive agree to amend the Employment Agreement on the terms set forth below.


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
		
	1.
	Section 2 (a) Duties of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read as follows: 


“2. Extent of Employment.
(a) Duties.  During the Employment Term and from and after the Effective Date, the Executive shall serve as President of TPRe USA. In addition, the Executive shall continue to serve as the Company’s Head of Investor Relations and Business Development, in such capacity reporting to the Chief Executive Officer of the Company. In each function, the Executive shall perform such duties, services, and responsibilities on behalf of TPRe USA and the Company, respectively, consistent with such positions as may be reasonably assigned to the Executive from time to time.  
		
	2.
	The parties hereto agree that except as specifically set forth in this Amendment No. 4, each and every provision of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as set forth therein.




[Signature Page Follows]







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 4 to be executed, and the Executive has hereunto set his hand, in each case to be effective as of the day and year first above written.
THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.


By: /s/ J. Robert Bredahl ______________________________
Name: Title:     J. Robert Bredahl
President & Chief Executive Officer




By: /s/ Janice R. Weidenborner
_____________________________
Name: Title:     Janice R. Weidenborner
EVP, Group General Counsel




EXECUTIVE
By:     /s/  Manoj K. Gupta
______________________________
Manoj K. Gupta
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3247 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt covered heavy-duty tow 

and recovery vehicles from certain weight limitations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. FLEISCHMANN (for himself and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Transportation 

and Infrastructure 

A BILL 

To amend title 23, United States Code, to exempt covered 

heavy-duty tow and recovery vehicles from certain weight 

limitations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Action for Inter5 state Recovery Vehicles on Truck Operating Weights Act’’ 

6 or the ‘‘FAIR TOW Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3247 IH

1 SEC. 2. VEHICLE WEIGHT LIMITATIONS—INTERSTATE SYS2 TEM. 

3 Section 127 of title 23, United States Code, is 

4 amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(m) COVERED HEAVY-DUTY TOW AND RECOVERY

6 VEHICLES.— 

7 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—The vehicle weight limita8 tions set forth in this section do not apply to a cov9 ered heavy-duty tow and recovery vehicle. 

10 ‘‘(2) COVERED HEAVY-DUTY TOW AND RECOV11 ERY VEHICLE DEFINED.—In this subsection, the 

12 term ‘covered heavy-duty tow and recovery vehicle’ 

13 means a vehicle that— 

14 ‘‘(A) is transporting a disabled vehicle 

15 from the place where the vehicle became dis16 abled to the nearest appropriate repair facility; 

17 and 

18 ‘‘(B) has a gross vehicle weight that is 

19 equal to or exceeds the gross vehicle weight of 

20 the disabled vehicle being transported.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### TEXAS & N. O. R. CO. v. DAVIS.

No. 2279.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Nov. 10, 1932.

Lamar Cecil, of Beaumont, and Stevens *&*Stevens, of Houston, for appellant.

H. A. Maynard, of Liberty, and E. E. Davis, of Beaumont, for appellee. '

WALKER, C. J.

This case originated in the justice court of Liberty county, and is before us on a second appeal from the judgment of the county court of that county awarding appellee judgment for $50 as the value of two cows killed by appellant. On the former appeal, T. & N. O. Railway Co. v. Davis, 26 S.W. (2d) 1106, to which we refer for a full statement of the nature of this suit, the issue was the ownership of these cattle, and, though that issue in the lower court was found in favor of ap-pellee, we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was without support in the evidence. The same proposition is presented on this appeal, but a careful review of the statement of facts convinces us that appellee has sustained his claim of ownership.

Under article -2065, the lower court erred in adjudging the costs of the county court against appellant. In justice court, ap-pellee recovered judgment, for $150 as the value of his cattle, but in county court his judgment was reduced to $50. Under the provisions of article 2065, R. C. S. 1925, appellant was entitled to recover the costs of the county court, except upon a showing of good cause for taxing it otherwise, under provisions of article 2066. The record in this case fails to disclose “good cause.” T. & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Davidson (Tex. Civ. App.) 24 S.W. (2d) 75; Hall v. Ellwood (Tex. Civ. App.) 34 S.W.(2d) S92.

Appellee was awarded interest on the value of his cattle, as fixed by the jury, at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum from the 22d day of August, 1928, the date his cattle .were killed. The cattle were killed at a point where appellant’s right of way was fenced, under the provisions of article 6402, R. C. S. 1925. Under the construction given by our courts to this article of the statute, appellee was entitled to interest only from the date of his judgment. I. & G. N. Railway Co. v. Barton, 93 Tex. 63, 53 S. W. 1117; St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Chambliss, 93 Tex. 62, 53 S. W. 343; Fort Worth *&*R. *G.*R. R. Co. v. Chisholm (Tex. Civ. App.) 146 S. W. 988; St. Louis & Southwestern Ry. Co. of Texas v. Post (Tex. Civ. App.) 220 S. W. 129.

Appellee’s cross-assignment against the verdict of the jury fixing the value of his cattle at $50 is overruled. The evidence would have sustained a judgment for a much larger sum, but the issue was submitted to the jury, arid its finding should not be disturbed.

Reformed and affirmed.
# Enrichment Systems Fabrication and Demonstration Section

### **Enrichment Systems Fabrication and Demonstration**

We support the deployment of new enrichment technology by fabricating and demonstrating systems.  We strive for top performance in safety, security, quality, accuracy, documentation, parts availability, and system downtime.
                        - **Manufacturing Process Engineering** - We provide process development, continuous improvement, and the subject matter expertise in manufacturing technology and quality control required to support a growing number of deployments. *Executes research and development manufacturing of prototype components. This group develops and demonstrates manufacturing and assembly approaches, applying novel fabrication tools and techniques.*
                        - **Prototype Manufacturing** - We execute high-precision fabrication and assembly activities to support both testing and technology maturation of centrifuge enrichment devices. *Executes research and development manufacturing of prototype components. This group develops and demonstrates manufacturing and assembly approaches, applying novel fabrication tools and techniques.*
                        - **R&D Demonstration** - We execute centrifuge gas test plans through rigorous conduct of operations, including 24/7 test operations. *Responsible for executing the operations that support testing. This team of expert operators and support staff enables groundbreaking science by making sure testing operations go smoothly.*
                        - SIPF Demonstration  - We are preparing for the eventual production of Xenon-129 through the development and demonstration of the SIPF system involving 24/7 operations.
                        - Supply Chain Management  - Our mission is to optimize the flow of goods and services, while ensuring the highest levels of quality, efficiency, and end-user satisfaction. We strive to continuously improve our processes, foster strong partnerships, and minimize waste and costs, all while prioritizing ethical and sustainable practices.

### Contact

CherlynJ Foster

fostercj@ornl.gov
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3495 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 

Received 

JULY 14, 2016 

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

AN ACT 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to allow 

for greater State flexibility with respect to excluding 

providers who are involved in abortions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3495 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Public 

3 Health and Safety Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. INCREASING STATE FLEXIBILITY IN DETERMINING 

5 PARTICIPATION OF PROVIDERS WHO PER6 FORM, OR PARTICIPATE IN THE PERFORM7 ANCE OF, ABORTIONS. 

8 Section 1902 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 1396a) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (a)(23), by striking ‘‘sub11 section (g)’’ and inserting ‘‘subsection (g), sub12 section (ll),’’; and 

13 (2) by adding at the end the following new sub14 section: 

15 ‘‘(ll) RULES WITH RESPECT TO DETERMINATION OF

16 PARTICIPATION OF PROVIDERS WHO PERFORM, OR PAR17 TICIPATE IN THE PERFORMANCE OF, ABORTIONS.— 

18 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Beginning October 1, 

19 2015, subject to paragraph (2), for purposes of this 

20 title, a State, at its option, may establish criteria 

21 with respect to the participation under the State 

22 plan (or under a waiver of the plan) of an institu23 tion, agency, entity, or person who performs, or par24 ticipates in the performance of, abortions. 

25 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—Paragraph (1) shall not 

26 apply to an abortion— 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3495 RFS

1 ‘‘(A) if the pregnancy is the result of an 

2 act of rape or incest; or 

3 ‘‘(B) in the case where a woman suffers 

4 from a physical disorder, physical injury, or 

5 physical illness that would, as certified by a 

6 physician, place the woman in danger of death 

7 unless an abortion is performed, including a 

8 life-endangering physical condition caused by or 

9 arising from the pregnancy itself. 

10 ‘‘(3) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this sub11 section, the terms ‘institution’, ‘agency’, or ‘entity’ 

12 mean the entire legal institution, agency, or entity, 

13 or any part thereof, including any institution, agen14 cy, or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is 

15 under common control with such institution, agency, 

16 or entity.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 29, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

# AGENCY:

Department of Energy.

# ACTION:

Designation of performance review board standing register.

# SUMMARY:

This notice provides the Performance Review Board (PRB) Standing Register for the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all previously published lists of PRB members.

# DATES:

This appointment is effective as of October 3, 2024.

Al-Daouk, Ahmad M.

Bell, Melody C.

Bishop, Tracey A.

Budney, Michael D.

deBeauclair, Geoffrey G.

Durant III, James M.

Hine, Scott E.

Hoffman, Patricia A.

Kinsey, Marlys L.

Konieczny, Katherine L.

Martin, Stephanie K.

Miller, Michael P.

Montoya, Michael M.

Plasynski, Sean I.

Richards, Jocelyn E.

Schultz, Douglas W.

Shoulta, Jeffrey L.

Susut, Ceren

William, West F.

## Signing Authority

                    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on October 3, 2024, by Farhana Hossain, Director of the Office of Corporate Executive Management within the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication as an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the                     **Federal Register**                    .                

      ( print page 81897)    
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 3, 2024.

Jennifer Hartzell,

Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.

[FR Doc. 2024-23267 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-17-00349-CR 

RICHARD AQUIRRE, JR., APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 84th District Court 

Ochiltree County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 5183, Honorable Curt Brancheau, Presiding 

 

May 17, 2018 

 

ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ. 

Pending before the court is an appeal by Richard Aguirre, Jr. from his criminal 

conviction. His attorney filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in which we were told that 

appellant no longer desired to prosecute the matter. The motion failed to comply with the 

rules of appellate procedure. That is, appellant’s signature did not appear on the 

document as required by Rule 42.2(a). See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). We brought this 

omission to the attention of appellant’s attorney, Todd Alvey, and directed Alvey to file a 

corrected motion by May 9, 2018, complying with that rule. No corrected motion has been 
2

filed. Nor has Alvey deigned to provide us with any explanation why he failed to heed our 

directive. Accordingly, we abate the appeal and remand the cause to the trial court.

The trial court is ordered to convene a hearing, upon reasonable notice, to 

determine whether appellant (1) desires to prosecute this appeal, and (2) is indigent. If 

both answers to those questions are yes, then the trial court shall also determine whether 

appellant has been denied the effective assistance of counsel. The argument and 

evidence, if any, presented at the hearing will be transcribed into a supplemental 

reporter’s record, which record the trial court shall cause to be filed with the Clerk of this 

Court by June 7, 2018. The trial court must also execute any written findings of fact and 

conclusions of law relevant to the matter. If it is determined that appellant desires to 

prosecute the appeal, is indigent, and has been denied the effective assistance of 

counsel, then the trial court shall appoint new counsel to represent appellant. So too 

must it include in its findings the name, address, and state bar number of the newly 

appointed counsel. The findings of fact executed by the trial court also shall be included

in a supplemental clerk’s record which the trial court will cause to be filed with the Clerk 

of this Court by June 7, 2018. Should further time be needed to complete the foregoing 

tasks, same must be requested before June 7, 2018.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Cynthia Grisham, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 13, 2009  /s/ Cynthia Grisham Cynthia Grisham President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3590 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to repeal 

the increase in the income threshold used in determining 

the deduction for medical care. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3590 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Halt Tax Increases 

3 on the Middle Class and Seniors Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF INCREASE IN INCOME THRESHOLD FOR 

5 DETERMINING MEDICAL CARE DEDUCTION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 213(a) of the Internal 

7 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ‘‘10 per8 cent’’ and inserting ‘‘7.5 percent’’. 

9 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

10 (1) Section 213 of such Code is amended by 

11 striking subsection (f). 

12 (2) Section 56(b)(1)(B) of such Code is amend13 ed by striking ‘‘without regard to subsection (f) of 

14 such section’’ and inserting ‘‘by substituting ‘10 per15 cent’ for ‘7.5 percent’ ’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 December 31, 2015. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 13, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3590 

AN ACT 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to 

in determining the deduction for medical care. repeal the increase in the income threshold used
Attachment 6: Open Fee-for-Service (FFS) FEHB Plan Contacts for Ordering 

Audio Cassette Tapes or CDs for the Visually Impaired 

Plan 

Code(s) Plan Name Material Type

Contact Person and Email 

Address Phone Fax

47 APWU CDs Jennifer Simon

jsimon@apwuhp.com

(410)424-1507 (410)424-1572

10, 11 BCBS CDs Paula Spurway

Paula.Spurway@bcbsa.com

(202)942-1274 (202)942-1263

31 GEHA CDs Bunny Kimbrough 

Bunny.Kimbrough@geha.com 

(816)257-5500 

ext. 5104

(816)257-3333

41, 45, 

48

Mail Handlers Audio

Cassette 

Tapes

Gloria Gedrich 

gloriagedrich@firsthealth.com

(301)517-2032 (301)517-2127

32 NALC Audio 

Cassette 

Tapes

Helen Ferris

HFerris@nalchbp.org

(703)729-8102 (703)729-8109

44 SAMBA CDs Sandy Webb 

swebb@sambaplans.com 

(301)984-4122 (301)984-6224
|   | CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO |
|--------|--------------------------------|

|   | 18      U.S.C. § 1350 |
|--------|----------------------------|

|   | AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO |
|--------|-----------------------------|

|   | SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF2002 |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------|

|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of  1934;  and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/  Alan R.  Steel |
|-------------------------------|
| Alan      R. Steel            |
| Chief      Financial Officer  |
| May      13, 2010             |

----
Exhibit
32




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Quarterly Report of TC Power Management Corp. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended February 29, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I,
Gordon W. Douglas, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,Secretary, Treasurer, and a Directorof the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:








(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(2)
              The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.






A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
TC Power Management Corp., and will be retained by TC Power Management Corp. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.


Dated
this 14th day of
April, 2008.




/s/ Gordon
W. Douglas


Gordon W.
Douglas


Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
 Secretary, Treasurer, and a
Director