alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3494 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide greater clarity 

for States with respect to excluding providers whose actions a State 

suspects causes termination of fetuses born alive, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 

Mrs. BLACKBURN introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 

on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 

Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within 

the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to provide 

greater clarity for States with respect to excluding providers whose actions a State suspects causes termination 

of fetuses born alive, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protecting Infants 

5 Born Alive Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3494 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLARIFYING STATES’ ABILITY TO EXCLUDE PRO2 VIDERS WHOSE ACTIONS STATES SUSPECT 

3 CAUSES TERMINATION OF FETUSES BORN 

4 ALIVE. 

5 Section 1902(a)(23) of the Social Security Act (42 

6 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(23)) is amended by inserting before the 

7 semicolon at the end the following: ‘‘, or as requiring a 

8 State to provide medical assistance for such services fur9 nished by a person or entity whose services or actions are 

10 suspected by the State of causing the termination of a 

11 human fetus who would be classified as an infant that is 

12 born alive under section 8 of title 1, United States Code’’. 

13 SEC. 3. PROTECTING PATIENTS BY NOT PROVIDING FED14 ERAL FUNDING TO PROVIDERS WHO TERMI15 NATE FETUSES BORN ALIVE. 

16 Section 1903(i) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

17 1396b(i)) is amended by inserting after paragraph (11) 

18 the following new paragraph: 

19 ‘‘(12) with respect to amounts expended for 

20 medical assistance for items and services furnished 

21 by a person or entity who has terminated a human 

22 fetus who would be classified as an infant that is 

23 born alive under section 8 of title 1, United States 

24 Code;’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3494 IH

1 SEC. 4. TERMINATION FROM PARTICIPATION IN FEDERAL 

2 HEALTH CARE PROGRAMS OF PROVIDERS 

3 WHO TERMINATE FETUSES BORN ALIVE. 

4 Section 1128(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1320a–7(a)) is amended by adding at the end the fol6 lowing new paragraph: 

7 ‘‘(5) TERMINATION OF BORN ALIVE INFANT.— 

8 Any individual or entity that has terminated a 

9 human fetus who would be classified as an infant 

10 that is born alive under section 8 of title 1, United 

11 States Code.’’. 

12 SEC. 5. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

13 The amendments made by this Act shall apply with 

14 respect to terminations occurring on or after the date of 

15 the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
JOSEPH A. DEJOIE, IV,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D15-5118

_____________________________/

Opinion filed March 4, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

T. Michael Jones, Judge.

Michael R. Rollo, Pensacola, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Matthew Pavese, Assistant Attorney 

General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.
---

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Derek Page, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
Sombrio Capital Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 21, 2008

/s/ Derek Page Derek PageChief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer

---
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunrise Global, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, and the principal financial officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Global,
Inc.





A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.




Date:
      August 19, 2009
              /s/
      Shaojun
      SunShaojun
      Sun, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief
      Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Diane Button, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) The amended Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: December 9, 2010  /s/ Diane Button Diane Button President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #20703 and #20704; SOUTH CAROLINA Disaster Number SC-20012]

# AGENCY:

U.S. Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 4.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Presidential declaration of a major disaster for the State of South Carolina (FEMA-4829-DR), dated September 29, 2024.

# DATES:

Issued on October 5, 2024.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         November 29, 2024.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         June 30, 2025.                    

# ADDRESSES:

*Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of the President's major disaster declaration for the State of South Carolina, dated September 29, 2024, is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster:

*Incident:*                     Hurricane Helene.                

*Incident Period:*                     September 25, 2024 and continuing.                

*Primary Counties (Physical Damage and Economic Injury Loans):*                     Hampton.                

*Contiguous Counties (Economic Injury Loans Only):*

South Carolina: Beaufort, Jasper.

Georgia: Effingham.

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Rafaela Monchek,

Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience.

[FR Doc. 2024-23577 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
Exhibit 31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer

I, Kevin Samuelson, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this
amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Infor, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                        
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: July 26, 2017 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ KEVIN SAMUELSON    
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Kevin Samuelson        
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
#### SUMNER v. GENERAL CONTRACT PURCHASE CORPORATION.

No. 1826—6310.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

April 3, 1935.

*742Wilson, Randal & Kilpatrick, of Lubbock, for plaintiff in error.

' Dallas C. Biggers and Roy W. McDonald, both of Dallas, for defendant in error.

GERMAN, Commissioner.

This suit was brought in the district court for a balance of $552.50, with a small amount of interest, and for'attorneys’ fees in the sum of $90. It also sought foreclosure of the mortgage on an automobile alleged to be of the value of $550. Judgment of the district court was in favor of the defendant, plaintiff in error here. This judgment was reversed by the Court of Civil Appeals and the cause remanded. 49 S.W.(2d) 960.

It is obvious that this court has no jurisdiction of this case in the absence of conflict in decision with the decision of some other c'ourt. While the petition for writ of error alleges a conflict with certain decisions, we have carefully examined same and find there is no conflict such as is necessary in order to confer jurisdiction on this court. The Court of Civil Appeals merely held that under a certain state of facts an automobile dealer was unauthorized to refinance defendant in error’s note with another company. The fact that the Court of Civil Appeals set aside the finding of the jury upon this issue does not show a conflict with prior decisions holding generally that ordinarily the. question of whether or not one party is agent for another is a question of fact. Under the decision of City National Bank in Childress v. Phillips Petroleum Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 78 S.W.(2d) 576, and authorities there cited, it is obvious that there was no such conflict of decision as to give this court jurisdiction. The writ of error was therefore improperly granted.

The application was not granted upon the conflicts alleged, and the granting of same was no doubt due to the opening statement in thé opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals to the effect that “this suit was filed in the district court of Lubbock County by appellant against appellee to recover on a note for the sum of $1,095, interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs, and for a foreclosure of a mortgage lien upon a certain automobile.” The suit was in fact for only a balance upon this note.

The writ of error ds dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
EX-10.6



 EXHIBIT 10.6 

AMENDMENT NUMBER THREE 

TO THE MGM RESORTS 

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN II 

WHEREAS, Section 11.2 of the MGM Resorts Deferred Compensation Plan II (the “Plan”) provides that the Committee
may amend the Plan in whole or in part, provided that no amendment or modification shall decrease or restrict the value of a Participant’s vested account balance in existence at the time of such amendment or modification; and 

WHEREAS, the Committee now desires to amend the Plan, effective June 1, 2012, to provide for immediate distribution of
certain small Account Balances in a lump sum, in accordance with the requirements of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(v). 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of June 1, 2012, the Plan is hereby amended as follows: 

 

	 	1.	 The title of Article 4 is hereby changed to read as follows: 



“Short-Term Payout; Unforeseeable Financial Emergencies; Withdrawal Elections; Small Sum
Cashouts” 
  

	 	2.	 Article 4 is amended to add the following Section 4.4 at the end thereof: 



“4.4 Small Sum Cashouts. Notwithstanding any provision in the Plan to the contrary,
if (i) the total of the Participant’s Account Balance under the Plan (together with the Participant’s account balance under any other arrangements that, with this Plan, would be treated as a single nonqualified deferred compensation
plan within the meaning of Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-1(c)(2) with the elective deferral component or employer contribution component of the Plan) does not exceed $16,500 on June 1, 2012, and (ii) no deferral election for the
Participant under the Plan has been made for the current Plan Year, such Participant’s Account Balance shall be distributed in a lump sum as soon as practicable and in no event later than [June 30], 2012; provided, however, that if the
Participant participates in any other arrangements that, together with this Plan, would be treated as a single nonqualified deferred compensation plan, the lump sum payment provided hereunder shall be made only if the Participant’s interests in
the other aggregated arrangements are also being paid out simultaneously. For Plan Years beginning after June 1, 2012, the Company may elect in writing to effect a cashout pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(j)(4)(v), where the
Account Balance under the Plan (together with account balances of any other aggregated arrangements) do not exceed the applicable dollar amount under Code Section 402(g)(1)(B) (or a lower threshold set by the Company in such election).”








 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by a duly authorized officer as of
the date set forth below. 
  

									
	By:	  	 /s/ John McManus
	  		  	Date:	  	May 31, 2012
					
	Its:	  	 Executive Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary
	  		  		  	


  
 2
---

Exhibit 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

The undersigned, Raymond Irvine, President, Secretary and
Treasurer of Teckmine Industries, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Teckmine Industries,
      Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Teckmine Industries, Inc.                                                                     

Dated: November 14, 2008

| | /s/
      Raymond Irvine                    
| | --------------------------------------------
| | Raymond Irvine                              
| | President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal     
| | Financial Officer and Principal Accounting  
| | Officer)                                    

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Teckmine
Industries, Inc. and will be retained by Teckmine Industries, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3610 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3610

To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate the exemption 
of companies located in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and any other 
                    possession of the United States.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 25, 2015

 Ms. Velazquez (for herself, Ms. Maxine Waters of California, and Mr. 
   Serrano) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                    Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Investment Company Act of 1940 to terminate the exemption 
of companies located in Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and any other 
                    possession of the United States.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Puerto Rico Investor Protection Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF EXEMPTION.

    Section 6(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-
6(a)) is amended by striking paragraph (1).
                                 <all>
```
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3661 

To terminate the independent third-party program for sectors of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery unless the program is fully funded by the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

OCTOBER 1, 2015 

Mr. GUINTA introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To terminate the independent third-party program for sectors 

of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery unless the program 

is fully funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘New England Fisher5 men Preservation Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3661 IH

1 SEC. 2. TERMINATION OF INDEPENDENT THIRD-PARTY 

2 MONITORING. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in subsection 

4 (b), the Secretary of Commerce shall not require sectors 

5 of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery to comply with the 

6 independent third-party monitoring program required by 

7 section 648.87 of title 50, Code of Federal Regulations 

8 (or similar successor regulation). 

9 (b) EXCEPTION.—The Secretary of Commerce may 

10 require sectors of the Northeast Multispecies Fishery to 

11 comply with the independent third-party monitoring pro12 gram required by section 648.87 of title 50, Code of Fed13 eral Regulations (or similar successor regulation), if the 

14 Administrator of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

15 Administration fully funds the program with funds appro16 priated for the Administration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS