alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.1


 





 


October 29, 2004


 


Mr. Ken Saunders

30862 Steeplechase Drive

San Juan Capistrano, CA 92675


RE: Amendment to Employment Agreement


 


Dear Ken:


 


This letter sets forth the agreement between you and Peregrine Systems,
Inc. (the “Company”) to amend the terms of the letter agreement between you and
the Company, dated July 20, 2004 (the “Employment Agreement”), as set
forth herein.


 


Effective as of October 1, 2004, the Employment Agreement is hereby
amended such that the last sentence of the introductory paragraph of the
Employment Agreement is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the
following:


 


“Additionally, effective on November 1, 2004 you will become the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.”


 


Other than as set forth herein, the terms and conditions of your
Employment Agreement shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  Please acknowledge your agreement with the
foregoing by executing this letter in the space provided below.


 


	
   

  	
  Sincerely,

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  /s/ John
  Mutch

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  John Mutch

  
	
   

  	
  Chief
  Executive Officer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Acknowledged
  and agreed

  	
   

  
	
  to as of
  October 29, 2004

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  /s/ Ken
  Saunders

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Ken Saunders
In the United States Court of Federal Claims 

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

No. 20-1661V

UNPUBLISHED

TAMMY SWEENEY,

 Petitioner,

v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES,

 Respondent.

Chief Special Master Corcoran 

Filed: February 25, 2022

Special Processing Unit (SPU); 

Ruling on Entitlement; Concession;

Table Injury; Influenza (Flu) Vaccine;

Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine 

Administration (SIRVA)

Nancy Routh Meyers, Turning Point Litigation, Greensboro, NC, for Petitioner.

Christine Mary Becer, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

RULING ON ENTITLEMENT1

On November 23, 2020, Tammy Sweeney filed a petition for compensation under 

the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2(the 

“Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a shoulder injury related to vaccine 

administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of an influenza (“flu”) vaccine that was administered 

to her on October 24, 2019. Petition at 1. The case was assigned to the Special 

Processing Unit of the Office of Special Masters.

On February 25, 2022, Respondent filed his Rule 4(c) report in which he concedes

that Petitioner is entitled to compensation in this case. Respondent’s Rule 4(c) Report at 

1. Specifically, Respondent agrees that “petitioner’s claim meets the Table criteria for 

SIRVA.” Id. at 5. Respondent further agrees that “the case was timely filed, that the 

1 Because this unpublished Ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required 

to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E-Government Act 

of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government 

Services). This means the Ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance 

with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, 

the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that 

the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 

2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease 

of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 

300aa (2012).
2

vaccine was received in the United States, and that petitioner satisfies the statutory 

severity requirement”. Id. Respondent also notes that “no civil action or proceedings have 

been pursued in connection with the vaccine-related injury.” Id.

In view of Respondent’s position and the evidence of record, I find that 

Petitioner is entitled to compensation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran

Brian H. Corcoran

Chief Special Master
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Payroll Office Letter

 

Number: P-99–26 Date : November 16, 1999

SUBJECT: Y2K CONTINGENCY PLAN FOR RITS

As you know, the Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) is a subsystem of the

Financial Management Service’s (FMS) Government On-line Accounting Link System (GOALS). 

FMS has tested GOALS for year 2000 (Y2K) compliance and we have tested our link with FMS.

Nonetheless, we believe it is critical that we have a contingency plan in place in the unlikely

event that agency payroll offices (APO) cannot access RITS after December 31, 1999.

If RITS is not available for APO use on the first payroll paid date in calendar year 2000, all APO

should continue to attempt to access it at least twice daily through January 7, 2000. Should

RITS become available to APOs on or before January 7, 2000, all APOs will immediately process

a RITS transmission for any elapsed payroll paid date on which it could not access RITS. 

This contingency plan will become operable should RITS remain unavailable to APOs on

January 10, 2000. In the event RITS remains unavailable on January 10, 2000, APOs will initiate

the remittance of contributions by and for covered employees via hard copy reporting. For the

purpose of this contingency plan, APOs will use the special SF 2812-L and the SF 2812-A, copies

of which are attached for local reproduction. The SF 2812-L and SF 2812-A MUST be

accompanied by a Treasury check or other negotiable instrument made payable to the “Office of

Personnel Management” in the amount of the grand total on the SF2812-L. The SF 2812-L/SF

2812-A and accompanying payment must be received by our lockbox bank on or as soon as

feasible after the payroll paid date. The address of our lockbox bank is:

Office of Personnel Management

Mercantile Bank

P.O. Box 953359

St. Louis, MO 63195-3359

Once RITS is again operational, APOs will NOT process a RITS submission for any payroll paid

date for which a hard copy SF 2812-L and payment has already been submitted.
 

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

2

If you should have questions regarding the matters discussed in this letter, please call Kenneth

Harris of my staff directly on (202) 606-4851, our general office number at (202) 606-0606, or you

may email us at finance@opm.gov. 

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Attachments
# 

                                The Frontier supercomputer gets to work                            

                                ORNL's methodical leap into the exascale era                            

                                OLCF teams fine-tune Frontier for science                            

## Filter Issues

### Date

            - 2023(15)
            - 2022(40)
            - 2021(46)
            - 2020(43)
            - 2019(40)
            - 2018(65)
            - 2017(32)
            - 2016(48)
            - 2015(21)

## Exascale impact

November 8, 2023

After debuting last year as ORNL’s fourth No. 1 supercomputer in a row and granting access to its first users in April, Frontier settled into regular operations this summer.

## Facts about Frontier

November 7, 2023

The Frontier supercomputer includes some of the world’s most advanced technologies.

## ORNL's methodical leap into the exascale era

November 6, 2023

How did the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility and its vendor partners AMD and HPE Cray overcome the daunting obstacles that stood between them and the world's first exascale supercomputer? It took a lot of organization, several false starts and some fortuitous advances in computing technology.

## Exascale tools for developing new reactors

November 5, 2023

As renewable sources of energy such as wind and sun power are increasingly added to the country’s electrical grid, old-fashioned nuclear energy is also being primed for a resurgence.

## OLCF teams fine-tune Frontier for science

November 4, 2023

Ensuring Frontier runs as advertised spanned two fronts: the hardware and software, handled mainly by the Operations Section, and the codes developed to run the various simulations, handled mainly by the Scientific Engagement Section.

## Pioneering Frontier

November 3, 2023

Here are a few of the many talented ORNL employees behind the construction and operation of Frontier.

## Why science?

November 2, 2023

ORNL is proud of its role in fostering the next generation of scientists and engineers.

### Pagination

-                Current page            1 
-                Page            2 
-                Page            3 
-                Page            4 
-                Page            5 
-                Page            6 
-                Page            7 
-                Page            8 
-                Page            9 
- …
-  Next pageNext › 
-  Last pageLast »
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 2683 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 2683

   To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Kennebunk 
                             River, Maine.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 6, 2000

   Ms. Snowe introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To deauthorize a portion of the project for navigation, Kennebunk 
                             River, Maine.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. KENNEBUNK RIVER, KENNEBUNK AND KENNEBUNKPORT, MAINE.

    The following portion of the project for navigation, Kennebunk 
River, Maine, authorized by section 101 of the River and Harbor Act of 
1962 (76 Stat. 1173), is not authorized after the date of enactment of 
this Act: the portion of the northernmost 6-foot deep anchorage the 
boundaries of which begin at a point with coordinates N1904693.6500, 
E418084.2700, thence running south 01 degree 04 minutes 50.3 seconds 35 
feet to a point with coordinates N190434.6562, E418084.9301, thence 
running south 15 degrees 53 minutes 45.5 seconds 416.962 feet to a 
point with coordinates N190033.6386, E418199.1325, thence running north 
03 degrees 11 minutes 30.4 seconds 70 feet to a point with coordinates 
N190103.5300, E418203.0300, thence running north 17 degrees 58 minutes 
18.3 seconds west 384.900 feet to the point of origin.
                                 <all>
```
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2010, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2010, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Foodfest International 2000 Inc. |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  September 14, 2010     |
|------------------------------------|
|                               |
| /s/ Henry Ender                    |
| Henry EnderChief Executive Officer |
# L_2011148DE.01002001.xml

| 7.6.2011 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 148/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.6.2011

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 148/20

---

Berichtigung der Richtlinie 2011/21/EU der Kommission vom 2. März 2011 zur Änderung der Richtlinie 91/414/EWG des Rates zwecks Aufnahme des Wirkstoffs Clethodim und zur Änderung der Entscheidung 2008/934/EG

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 58 vom 3. März 2011
  )

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 58 vom 3. März 2011

Auf Seite 50, Erwägungsgrund 7, dritter Satz:

anstatt:

„... Boden- und Grundwasserbelastung ...“

muss es heißen:

„... Boden- und Grundwasserexposition ...“

Auf Seite 52, Anhang, Tabelle, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“, Teil A:

anstatt:

„Nur Anwendungen als Pflanzenschutzmittel für Zuckerrüben dürfen zugelassen werden.“

muss es heißen:

„Nur Anwendungen als Herbizid für Zuckerrüben dürfen zugelassen werden.“

Auf Seite 52, Anhang, Tabelle, Spalte „Sonderbestimmungen“, Teil B, Absatz 3 erster Gedankenstrich:

anstatt:

„... Boden- und Grundwasserbelastung;“

muss es heißen:

„... Boden- und Grundwasserexposition;“.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 337 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 337

 To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2015

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
         to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To provide limitations on maritime liens on fishing permits, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Maritime Lien Reform Act''.

SEC. 2. LIMITATION ON MARITIME LIENS ON FISHING PERMIT AND PERMIT 
              DESCRIPTION.

    (a) In General.--Subchapter I of chapter 313 of title 46, United 
States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing permit and permit 
              description
    ``(a) In General.--This chapter--
            ``(1) does not establish a maritime lien on a permit that--
                    ``(A) authorizes a person or use of a vessel to 
                engage in fishing; and
                    ``(B) is issued under State or Federal law; and
            ``(2) does not authorize any civil action to enforce a 
        maritime lien on such a permit.
    ``(b) Fishing Permit Described.--A fishing permit--
            ``(1) is governed solely by the State or Federal law under 
        which it was issued; and
            ``(2) is not included in the whole of a vessel or as an 
        appurtenance or intangible of a vessel for any purpose.
    ``(c) Limitation on Statutory Construction.--Nothing in subsections 
(a) and (b) shall be construed as imposing any limitation upon the 
authority of the Secretary of Commerce to modify, suspend, revoke, or 
sanction any Federal fishery permit issued by the Secretary of Commerce 
or to bring a civil action to enforce such modification, suspension, 
revocation, or sanction.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections at the beginning of 
such chapter is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 
31309 the following:

``31310. Limitation on maritime liens on fishing permit and permit 
                            description.''.
                                 <all>
```
O'toole, Catherine (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: 

# WL

O'toole, Catherine (OST) Tuesday, April14, 2015 3:16 PM John Mietus Ed Wegel (ed.wegel@easternairlines.aero); Remo, Laura (OST) RE: Eastern- changes in 119 personnel Regarding the new employees, please post resumes and citizenship information and any 204.3 (I) (m) (o) (p) (q) information in the docket. From: Ed Wegel [mailto:ed.wegel@easternairlines.aero] Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 2:55 PM To: Remo, Laura (OST); O'toole, Catherine (OST); Brian.D.Karns@faa.gov Cc: John Mietus; Alan Brandon; Terry Pentecost; John Furneaux Subject: Eastern- changes in 119 personnel Dear Laura and Katy I write to inform you ofseveral changes to our 119 personnel. 

### 1. Director ofMaintenance- Daniel Stone has resigned and Terry Pentecost has replaced him as DOM 2. Director ofQuality/ ChiefInspector- as the result ofTerry Pentecost assuming the DOMposition, we have hired Michael Jefferson as his replacement as DQC 3. ChiefPilot- Alan Brandonhas beenpromotedto Vice President- Regulatory Affairs·out ofthe CP position and has been replaced by JuanNunez. I will be providing updatedresumes for each newposition later today. Please let me knowwhat else we need to amend our filings with DOT Bestregards EdWegel

EDWARD J. WEGEL \\ \\ Tel: 305.869.4249 \\ easternairlines.aero Eastern Air Lines Group, Inc. 4200 NW 36th Street, Bldg. 5A, Miami, FL 33166**~EASTERN**

1 .... :,./
## IN THE COU RT O F CR IM IN AL AP PE ALS OF TE XAS N O . A P - 75, 994
EX PA R TE BE V ER LY A N N C H A M BE R LA I N , A ppl i c ant
ON AP P LI CAT I ON F OR A W RI T OF HABE AS CORP US CA USE NO . CR- 2 2 6 7 - 0 0 - F I N THE 3 3 2 CRI M I NAL DI S TRI CT CO URT ND FROM HI DALG O CO UNTY
P er cur i am . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Crim i n al P ro ce dure, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habe as cor

pus. Ex pa rte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty and wa s convicted
o f one count of

intox ication manslaug hter, one count of manslaughter, two c ounts of intox ication assaul t , and two counts of a g g ravated assault and se ntence d to six eig ht-y ear sentenc es, running
concur rently
. Applicant conte nds that her c onvictions for manslaug hter and ag g ravated assault violate the Double Jeopardy

Clause of the US Constit ution. Applicant was indicted f or killing one individualand har

ming two other s duringthe s am e cr i m inal episode. When the same victim is allege d, convictions for both intox ication manslaug hter a nd manslaug hter violate D ouble J eopar dy
. Er win
v . S tate , 9 91 S.W. 2d

80 4 ( Te x. Cr im. Ap p. 19 99 ). Al so , c onvic tio ns fo r b oth int oxic atio n a ssa

ult and ag g ravated assault violate Double J eopar dy when the sa

me victim and ac tion are involved. Both the State a

nd the trial cour

t ag ree with Applicant’s conte ntions and rec ommend g rantingrelief
. Applicant is entitled to relief
. Relief is g rante d. The judg ments in c ounts f our, five, a

nd six of Cause N o. CR-2267-00-F in t he 33 2 Judic ia l D istri c t Co ur t of Hi da lg o County are va c ate d and se t a sid e . A ll c ha lle ng e s to nd the judg ments in c ount one , two, and thre e ar e denie d. Applicant’s c laims of ineffe ctive assistanc e of counse l, involuntary

plea, de fec tive indictments, and due proc ess violations are de nied. Copies of this opinion s hall b e s e nt to the Texas Depar tment of Criminal J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Parole Division.

Deliver ed: September

10, 2008 Do No t Pu

bli sh
-  Isotopes – Improved process for medicine Read More 

# Radioisotope Research and Development

We provide leadership in the science and technology of radioisotope target design, radiochemical separations, process development, and innovative applications. 

## Our Groups

View a hi-res version of this image

Emerging Isotopes Research

/group/emerging-isotopes

View a hi-res version of this image

Isotope Applications Research

/group/isotope-applications

View a hi-res version of this image

Radiochemical Separations Science

/group/radiochemical

View a hi-res version of this image

Target Design, Analysis, and Qualification

/group/target-daq

View a hi-res version of this image

Target Production and Infrastructure Development

/group/target-pidev

### Contact

SusanL Hogle

hoglesl@ornl.gov

## Current Research

## Publication

  Production of Cf-252 and other transplutonium isotopes at Oak Ridge National Laboratory...

## Publication

  Effects of annealing on fission fragment release from electrodeposited Cf-252 thin-films...

## Publication

  Analysis of Fission Product Distribution and Composition in the TRISO Layers of AGR-2 Fuel...

## Publication

  Separation and Purification of Berkelium-249 and Einsteinium-254...
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6415

TROY GOODMAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

BRIAN A. ABRAHAM, Prosecuting Attorney;

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern

District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Elizabeth V. Hallanan,

Senior District Judge. (CA-02-1370-2)

Submitted: May 15, 2003 Decided: May 28, 2003

Before LUTTIG and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy Goodman, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Troy Goodman appeals the district court’s order accepting the

report and recommendation of a magistrate judge and denying his

petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Goodman v. Abraham, No. CA-02-

1370-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 4, 2003). We grant Goodman leave to proceed

in forma pauperis on appeal. We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# i***-/r

COA# 08-13-00323-CR Roger Evan Garrettv. The 

### STYLE: State ofTexas OFFENSE: 19.02 

### COUNTY: El Paso COA DISPOSITION: AFFIRM TRIAL COURT: 168th District Court DATE: 11/4/15 Publish: no TCCASE#: 20130D01613



### IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ELECTRONIC RECORD 

### Roger Evan Garrettv. The State STYLE: ofTexas CCA#: 

## PRO SE Petition FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS: 

# DATE: z7jr/^//%V^ JUDGE: CCA Disposition: DATE: 

# lfc?g-/S" /ttfa* AaA**" JUDGE: SIGNED: PUBLISH:

REHEARING IN CCA IS: JUDGE: PC:_ DNP:

MOTION FOR