alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Highlands
      Acquisition Corp.**




**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Highlands Acquisition Corp. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Robert W. Pangia, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operations of the Company.




*Date:
                November 16, 2007*
            *By:*
            */s/
                Robert W. Pangia**Name:*
            *Robert
                W. Pangia**Title:*
            *Chief
                Executive Officer**(Principal
                Executive Officer)*





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 15-308 Date: November 2015

Subject: Calendar Year 2016 Interest Rate

The U.S. Treasury has announced the calendar year 2016 interest rate is 2.0 percent. This rate is 

applicable to “post-1956” military service credit accounts. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management 

(OPM) also will apply this rate to civilian service credit and voluntary contribution accounts. 

Employing agencies must assess interest on the unpaid balance in post-1956 military service credit 

accounts on an employee’s “interest accrual date” (IAD), and interest is compounded annually.

The actual interest rate applied is a “composite” rate, based on the rates in effect during the 12-month 

period preceding the IAD. Thus, it has components of both the current and previous year’s interest rates. 

For instance, the rate applied on October 1, 2016, reflects a composite interest rate of 2.0 percent [three 

month (October 1 to December 31, 2015) at 2.0 percent and nine months (January 1 to September 30, 

2016) at 2.0 percent]. 

Chapter 23 of the Civil Service Retirement System/Federal Employees Retirement System (CSRS/FERS) 

Handbook contains guidance for computing interest on military service credit deposits, including the 

determination of the IAD and the formula for composite interest rates. It is available at 

http://www.opm.gov/retire/pubs/handbook/hod.htm. For your convenience, we have attached a PDF file 

formatted spreadsheet containing the composite interest rates for each IAD through December 31, 2016. 

To reduce the unpaid balance in a military service credit account prior to the assessment of additional 

interest, a remittance must be received on time. To be considered timely, remittances must be physically 

in the possession of the agency official authorized to receive them by the close of business on the last 

regular business day before the IAD. Thus, for deposits sent by mail, the date on the postmark does not 

constitute the date of remittance. 

If you have questions about this letter, please send an email to FinancialBALs@opm.gov or call us on 

202-606-0606. We look forward to assisting you. 

 Kolo Babagana 

Acting Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services 

Attachment
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 NOTICE OF FULL REDEMPTION
Senior Floating Rate Notes due 2010
PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
CUSIP No. 701081 AP 6 *
      First Class/Registered/Certified Mail
    
    Express Delivery Only
    
    By Hand OnlyThe Bank of New York
    
    The Bank of New York
    
    The Bank of New YorkGlobal Corporate Trust
    
    Global Corporate Trust
    
    Global Corporate TrustP.O. Box 2320
    
    2001 Bryan Street, 9th Floor
    
    Corporate Trust WindowDallas, Texas 75221-2320
    
    Dallas, Texas 75201
    
    101 Barclay Street, 1st Floor EastNew York, New York 10286
  
 *
    
    The CUSIP number is included in this notice of
redemption solely for the convenience of the holders of the Notes. Neither the
Company nor the Trustee is responsible for the selection or use of the CUSIP
number, nor is any representation made as to the correctness or accuracy of the
CUSIP number printed on the Notes or listed in this notice of redemption.
EXHIBIT 32.2(2)




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF


THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of Verdant Automotive Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dennis Hogan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, based on my knowledge:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date: August 15, 2011




/s/ Dennis HoganDennis Hogan

Chief Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6065

JAMES EDWARD HARRIS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

CITY OF RALEIGH; RALEIGH CHIEF OF POLICE;

OFFICER MADDOCK; OFFICER DUFAULT; OFFICER J.W.

BISHOP; OFFICER S. M. HOOLAN; OFFICER D. B.

KILGORE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,

District Judge. (5:06-cv-00496-D)

Submitted: July 25, 2007 Decided: August 2, 2007

Before WILKINSON and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Edward Harris, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

James Edward Harris appeals the district court’s orders

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Harris v. City of Raleigh, No. 5:06-cv-00496-D

(E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2006; Jan. 3, 2007). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
#### Ex parte ROBERTS.

No. 18140.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1935.

Fred Woodard, of Crane, and Mae M. Ament, of Alpine, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

From an order remanding appellant to the custody of the sheriff upon a hearing of an application for a writ of habeas corpus, appellant attempts to bring this case here on appeal.

We observe in the record no notice of appeal given and entered as required by law. The only way this court acquires jurisdiction of an appealed case is by the giving and entry of a proper notice of appeal.

Being without jurisdiction, the appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT
31





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT





I, Judson
Bibb, certify that:





(1)           I
have reviewed this quarterly report of Bibb Corporation;





(2)           Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement  of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;





(3)           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of Bibb Corporation as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





(4)           Bibb
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)):





(a)           
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to Bibb Corporation, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of Bibb Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in Bibb Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during Bibb Corporation's most recent fiscal quarter
(Bibb Corporation's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, Bibb Corporation's internal control over financial reporting;
and





(5)           Bibb
Corporation's other certifying officer(s) and I have  disclosed, based
on our  most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to Bibb Corporation's auditors and the audit committee of Bibb
Corporation's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





(a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect Bibb Corporation's ability to record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and




(b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in Bibb Corporation's internal control over financial
reporting.








Dated:  November  9,
2009                                                                   BIBB CORPORATION





/s/
Judson Bibb


By:
Judson Bibb, President,


Chief
Executive Officer and Director
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2558

___________ Kenneth W. Thompson, * * Petitioner, * * Petition for Review from v. * Decision of the Railroad * Retirement Board. Railroad Retirement Board, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Respondent. *

___________ Submitted: December 22, 1997 Filed: December 31, 1997

___________ Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Kenneth W. Thompson petit ions for review of the Railroad Retirement Board & s (RRB) denial o f his application for a disability annuity under the Railroad Retirement Act.
We affirm decisio ns of the RRB where the decision is supported by substantial evidence, has a reasonable basis in law, and is not arbitrary. See Bowman v. Railroad Retirement Bd. , 952 F.2d 207, 210 (8th Cir. 1991). We use the same disabilit y standard as under the Social Security Act, and we use Social Security case law a s precedent. Id. at 209.-2-

We conclude that the hearings offi cer gave proper consideration to Thompson & s subjective com

plaints of pain. See Polaski v. Heckler , 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir. 1984) (fa ctors). We further conclude that the hypotheticals posed to the vocationa l expert (VE) were proper, as they included Thompson & s specific vocationa l characteristics and those functional restrictions accepted as true by the hearings officer. See Roberts v. Heckler , 783 F.2d 110, 112 (8th Cir. 1985) (per curiam) (“hypothetical is sufficient if it sets forth the impairments which are accepte d as true”). Therefore, the VE & s testimony constitutes substantial evidence supporting the hearings officer & s decisi on. See Bowman , 952 F.2d at 211 (hearings officer & s conclusion was based on subst antial evidence where he considered VE & s testimony and claimant & s specifi c characteristics in concluding claimant could perform other work). Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
SHARE

# Scientific Advisory Committee

The Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Energy Science and Technology Directorate Scientific Advisory Committee provides guidance regarding the strategic direction and alignment of the directorate with current and future needs of the Department of Energy and the country.

View a hi-res version of this image

### Reuben Sarkar

Committee ChairPresident & CEOAmerican Center for Mobility

https://www.acmwillowrun.org/team/reuben-sarkar/

View a hi-res version of this image

### Alexis Abramson

Dean and Professor of EngineeringThayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth

https://engineering.dartmouth.edu/community/faculty/alexis-abramson

View a hi-res version of this image

### Anjan Bose

Distinguished Professor of Power EngineeringWashington State University

https://school.eecs.wsu.edu/bose-biography/

View a hi-res version of this image

### Rob Ivester

Deputy DirectorNIST Manufacturing Extension Partnership

https://www.nist.gov/people/robert-w-ivester

View a hi-res version of this image

### Ari Patrinos

Chief Scientist and Research DirectorNOVIM Group

https://engineering.nyu.edu/faculty/aristides-patrinos

View a hi-res version of this image

### Steve Rogers

Senior ScientistAir Force Research Laboratory

https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/108011/dr-steven-k-roge...

View a hi-res version of this image

### Anna Stefanopoulou

William Clay Ford Professor of TechnologyUniversity of Michigan

https://me.engin.umich.edu/people/faculty/anna-stefanopoulou/

View a hi-res version of this image

### Roxann Walsh

Director, Energy Delivery Systems R&DSouthern Company

https://www.nationalcarboncapturecenter.com/leadership/roxann-walsh/
#### D. R. HENDERSON, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20295.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 25, 1939.

M. E. Cain, of Liberty, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for forgery; punishment assessed is two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

The appellant has filed an affidavit to dismiss this appeal, duly certified as required by law. The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pop Starz Records, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Adam Wasserman
                                        ------------------
                                        Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 33.3



LOGO

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

PHH Mortgage Corporation (the Asserting Party) is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from
January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations (the CFR), except for criteria set forth in
Section 229.1122(d)(3)(i)(c), (d)(4)(xv) and (d)(1)(iii) of the CFR, which the Asserting Party has concluded are not applicable to the servicing activities it performs with respect to the transactions covered by this report (the
Applicable Servicing Criteria). The criteria set forth in Section 229.1122 (d)(2)(i), (d)(2)(ii), (d)(4)(iv), (d)(4)(vii), (d)(4)(viii) and (d)(4)(xi) of the CFR are performed by outsource providers on behalf of the Asserting Party;
however, the Asserting Party has monitored the outsourcing of these criteria and assumes responsibility for compliance. The transactions covered by this report include all non-agency loan sale agreements executed after January 1, 2006 as well
as all re-securitization transactions after January 1, 2006 for which the Asserting Party served as servicer (the Platform).

The
Asserting Party has assessed its compliance with the Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria with respect to the Platform taken as a whole.

Deloitte & Touche, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report on the assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

PHH Mortgage
Corporation

Date: February 26, 2016



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ Glen A. Messina
|Glen A. Messina    
|President          



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/ Martin L. Foster                  
|Martin L. Foster                      
|Senior Vice President  Loan Servicing
##### 



Exhibit
99.1
 
 Exhibit 99.1 Horizon Offshore, Inc.
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors
for the Special Meeting of Stockholders on      , 2007 The undersigned hereby appoints William B. Gibbens, III, proxy for the undersigned, with full
power of substitution, to represent the undersigned and to vote, as designated below, all of the
shares of common stock of Horizon Offshore, Inc. (the Company) that the undersigned is entitled
to vote at the special meeting of stockholders of the Company to be held on      , 2007, and
any adjournments thereof. Please specify your choices by marking the appropriate boxes on the reverse side. If no
specific directions are given, this proxy will be voted FOR the approval and adoption of the
agreement and plan of merger and FOR the approval of the adjournment of the special meeting. The
individual designated above will vote in his discretion on any other matter that may properly come
before the meeting. (Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side) Address Change/Comments (Mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)
 ? FOLD AND DETACH HERE?




---



##### 



Please mark here for address change or comments.
SEE REVERSE SIDE The Board of Directors unanimously recommends a vote FOR Proposals 1 and 2 below. FOR            AGAINST ABSTAIN Proposal 1:Approval and adoption of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of June 11, 2007, by and among Cal Dive International,
Inc., Cal Dive Acquisition, LLC and Horizon Offshore, Inc. FOR            AGAINST ABSTAIN Proposal 2:Approval of the adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in favor of
Proposal 1. Please mark, sign, date and return this proxy promptly using the enclosed envelope. Signature of
Stockholder: Date: Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as
executor, administrator, attorney, trustee, or guardian please give full title as such. If a
corporation, please sign full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized persons. ? FOLD AND DETACH HERE? WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF INTERNET OR TELEPHONE VOTING,
BOTH ARE AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY, 7 DAYS A WEEK. Internet and telephone voting is available through 11:59 PM Eastern Time
the day prior to the special meeting date. Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxy to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. INTERNET            TELEPHONE
http://www.proxyvoting.com/hoff 1-866-540-5760   Use any touch-tone telephone to
Use the Internet to vote your proxy. vote your proxy. Have your
Have your proxy card in hand            proxy
when you access the web site. ORcard in hand when you call.
     If you vote your proxy by Internet or by telephone, you do NOT need to mail back your proxy card.
To vote by mail, mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the enclosed postage-paid
envelope.