alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SHARE

# Science and Discovery

As the US Department of Energy’s largest multi-program laboratory, ORNL is engaged in a wide range of activities that support the department’s mission of ensuring America’s security and prosperity by addressing its energy and environmental challenges. To accomplish this, the laboratory applies a remarkable portfolio of scientific expertise and world-class scientific facilities and equipment to develop scientific and technological solutions.

ORNL focuses these resources on delivering scientific discoveries and new technologies that will address pressing challenges in the areas of clean energy and global security, as well as creating economic opportunity for the nation. The laboratory’s major initiatives reflect an orientation toward both scientific disciplines and national missions, a combination that distinguishes ORNL and enables us to deliver national-scale solutions to problems of critical importance.

From the earliest days of Manhattan Project, ORNL has focused on translational science, where basic and applied research work together to facilitate and accelerate use-inspired fundamental science and science-driven technology development.  Today, the nation’s economic future depends on a vibrant science and technology infrastructure that supports industries that can compete globally as they take discoveries from the laboratory to the marketplace.

ORNL boasts state-of-the-art capabilities across a wide range of scientific and engineering disciplines, including materials science and engineering, computer and computational science, neutron scattering, neutron science and technology, biological and environmental research, nuclear physics and engineering, fusion and fission science and technology, and energy efficiency and renewable energy (building technologies, advanced manufacturing, transportation technologies).

Oak Ridge is also the place to be for scientists and engineers who want to be leaders in their disciplines while addressing challenging problems in a multidisciplinary environment. Our researchers work in laboratories with world-class, often unique, facilities including the Spallation Neutron Source, High Flux Isotope Reactor, Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility, National Transportation Research Center, Manufacturing Demonstration Facility, Buildings Technologies Research and Innovation Center, Center for Advanced Simulation of Light Water Reactors, and many more.  

Resources like these enable the US to compete in what former ORNL Director Alvin Weinberg called the arena of “Big Science” and they empower our researchers to pursue knowledge that’s fundamental to solving some of our world’s greatest challenges, from clean water to sustainable energy to nuclear security.
STRUCTURE ACTIVITY TEAM REPORT 02/05/08

CASE NUMBER: P08-0199

RELATED CASES:

CONCLUSIONS/DISCUSSIONS

TYPE OF CONCERN: HEALTH ECOTOX

LEVEL OF CONCERN: 2 1

KEYWORDS: IMMUNOTOX ONCO LUNG OVERLOAD (UNCERT)

IRR-E

SUMMARY OF ASSESSMENT

FATE: Solid S < 0.001 mg/L at 25 E C (E)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 E C (E)

BP > 400 E C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = U via U Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = U Sorption to soils/sediments = U
PBT Potential: P3B1T1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = U

HEALTH: Expect poor absorption via all routes (pchem/analog). Concern for immunotoxicity and oncogenicity based on data for analogues. Uncertain concern for lung overload for a poorly soluble particulate and irritation
based on submitted test data.

*CEB HEALTH: Moderate concern (Dermal, inhalation, drinking water); XB: Testing desired

Test data: rat oral LD

0 = 2000 mg/kg; no skin irritation in rabbits; mild eye irritation in rabbits, cleared by 96 h

ECOTOX: Predicted (P) and measured (M) toxicity values in mg/L (ppm) are:
fish 96-h LC50 = * P daphnid 48-h LC50 = * P green algal 96-h EC50 = * P fish chronic value = * P daphnid ChV = * P algal ChV = * P Predictions are based on SARs for neutral organic chemicals; SAR chemical class = ; solid; log Kow >> 10 (P); S = negligible; pH7; effective concentrations based on 100%active ingredients and nominal concentrations; DW hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and DW TOC <2.0 mg/L; low concern for toxicity;
assessment factor = 10.0 concern concentration = *
*CEB ECOTOX: No releases to water

SAT Co-chair: Leonard Keifer 260-1548
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 194 (Monday, October 7, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23128]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CIVIL RIGHTS COLD CASE RECORDS REVIEW BOARD

[Agency Docket Number: CRCCRRB-2025-0001-N]


Notice of Formal Determination on Records Release

AGENCY: Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) 
provided 69 pages of records to the Civil Rights Cold Case Records 
Review Board related to a civil rights cold case incident to which the 
Review Board assigned the unique identifier 2023-001-001. NARA did not 
propose any postponements of disclosure. On October 1, 2024, the Review 
Board determined that the records should be publicly disclosed in the 
Civil Rights Cold Case Records Collection. By issuing this notice, the 
Review Board complies with section 7(c)(4) of the Civil Rights Cold 
Case Records Collection Act of 2018 that requires the Review Board to 
publish in the Federal Register its determinations on the disclosure or 
postponement of records in the Collection no more than 14 days after 
the date of its decision.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephannie Oriabure, Chief of Staff, 
Civil Rights Cold Case Records Review Board, 1800 F Street NW, 
Washington, DC 20405, (771) 221-0014, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#89e0e7efe6c9eae6e5edeae8faecfbeceae6fbedfaa7eee6ff"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c05020a032c0f0300080f0d1f091e090f031e081f420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Authority: Pub. L. 115-426, 132 Stat. 5489 (44 U.S.C. 2107).

    Dated: October 2, 2024.
Stephannie Oriabure,
Chief of Staff.
[FR Doc. 2024-23128 Filed 10-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-SY-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
1 In The



### Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO

. 09

- 1 3

- 00 078

- C R



### ____________________

JASON EARL BRENT

, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

_______________________________________________________ ______________

On A ppeal from the 221st District Court

Montgomery County, Texas

Trial Cause No

. 11

- 12

- 13751 CR

________________________________________________________ _____________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Jason Earl Brent has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P.

42.2. A request to dismiss the appeal is signed by appellant personally and joined by

counsel of record. No opinion has issued in this appeal. The motion is granted, and the

appeal is theref ore dismissed.

APPEAL DISMISSED.2 ________________________________ HOLLIS HORTON

Justice

Opinion Delivered April 10, 2013

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
#### WOODWARD et al. v. HARLIN.

Motion No. 9665; No. 5580.

Supreme Court of Texas.

July 22, 1931.

For former opinion, see 39 S.W.(2d) 8.

GREENWOOD, J.

On motion for rehearing, attention is called to chapter 88, General Law's of the Thirty-Fourth Legislature, approved March 22, 1915, page 141, which confers on the county court of Dawson county “original concurrent jurisdiction with the justices’ courts in all civil matters.” Such an act appears to have been upheld as constitutional in Gulf, W. T. & P. Ry. Co. v. Fromme, 98 Tex. 462, 84 S. W. 1054. Under the statuté, the petition did state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of the county court of Dawson county for the recovery of $25.77, and we correct our statement to the contrary.

The right judgment was originally entered, and the motion for rehearing is overruled.
(logo) Rialto

         CAPITAL

 

 

**2018 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item1123)**

 

Pooling and ServicingAgreement (the “Pooling and Servicing Agreement”) dated as of September 1, 2012by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. as Depositor,Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Master Servicer, Rialto CapitalAdvisors, LLC as Special Servicer, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. as TrustAdvisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association as Certificate Administrator,as Tax Administrator and as Custodian and U.S. Bank National Association asTrustee relating to the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-LC5,Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-LC5 **(WFCM2012-LC5)**

 

 

The undersigned, a dulyauthorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the“Special Servicer”) herein certifies to the following:

 

1.     Allservicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under thePooling and Servicing Agreement are performed on behalf of the SpecialServicer.

 

2.     Areview of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer forthe period of January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”) inaccordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has been conducted under mysupervision.

 

3.     Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the terms of the Pooling and ServicingAgreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there hasbeen a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, eachfailure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identifiedherein.

 

 

Certified by: /s/ Adam Singer

Adam Singer, Managing Director

 

Date: March 1, 2019
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;(b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;(c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and(d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Vicki J. DuncombVicki J. DuncombVice President and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nine Mile Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, **Michael Christensen**, Principal Accounting Officer of the            Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

| /s/ | **MICHAELCHRISTENSEN** |
|-----|------------------------|

 

**Michael Christensen**

Principal Accounting Officer

November 19, 2009

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its            staff upon request. The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
#### GULF STATES UTILITIES CO. v. GRUBBS.

No. 2392.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

July 6, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Aug. 16, 1933.

Orgain, Carroll & Bell and Ewell Strong, all of Beaumont, for appellant.

O. R. Sholars, of Orange, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

This is the second appeal of this case. On the former appeal this court reversed and remanded the ease because of errors in the court’s charge. See 44 S.W.(2d) 1001.

Appellant is the owner and operator of the waterworks system in the city of Orange. Appellee, who was plaintiff in the court below, alleged in his petition that defendant negligently, and without his order, knowledge, or consent, turned on the water on his premises,, after it had been cut off for some time, and, certain faucets being open, the water flooded a portion of the second story of his house, damaging the wall paper, paint, and woodwork to the amount of $200, for-which he sued. The trial was to the court, a jury being waived, and at the conclusion of the evidence judgment was entered in favor of appellee for the sum of $125.

At the request of appellant, the court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law, wherein it was found, in substance, that plaintiff’s water pipes had not been connected with the pipes of defendant for some time prior to the occasion complained of, and were open at the outlets to secure proper drainage ; that defendant connected its water pipes to those of the plaintiff without proper authorization from or notice to him; that such act on the part of the defendant was negligence, proximately causing the injury to plaintiff’s house; and that plaintiff’s property had been damaged in the sum of $125.

By numerous assignments, the appellant attacks the judgment on the ground that the findings of fact above summarized have no support in the evidence. These assignments are overruled. We have carefully examined the statement of facts, and, while the evidence is not altogether clear on some of the issues, particularly as to the exact amount of the damage, nevertheless there is evidence in favor of each of the findings made by the trial court, and we are unable to say that the judgment is without support.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Ken MacAlpine, President, Secretary and
Treasurer of Sombrio Capital Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sombrio Capital
      Corp. for the period ended January 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Sombrio Capital Corp.                                                                   

Dated: March 23, 2009

/s/ Ken MacAlpine Ken MacAlpine President, Secretary
and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sombrio Capital
Corp. and will be retained by Sombrio Capital Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
UN PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. TIBEL CLARK, a/k/a Felix Johnson , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence

. C. Weston Houck , Senior District Judge. ( 4:01

- cr - 00056

- CWH

- 2 ; 4:16

- cv - 02164

- CWH; 4:16

- cv - 02442

- CWH )

Submitted : March 29 , 2018 Decided: April 2, 2018

Before AGEE and DIAZ , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tibel Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES AT TORNEY, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tibel Clark seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion s . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2 253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v

. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Clark has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabili ty and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Geovic Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
John E. Sherborne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |  |  |     |  |                        
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John E. Sherborne  
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | John E. Sherborne      
|                      |  |  |  |     |  | Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 7, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jerry S. Von RohrName:
    
    Jerry S. Von RohrTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
Opinion issued December 20 , 2012.

In The 

## Court of Appeals
For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 1 2
- 00 9 08
- CR

——————————— IN RE MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL RETARDATION AUTHORITY

OF HARRIS COUNTY , Relator

O riginal Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

M EMORANDUM OPINION In this original proceeding, relator Mental Health and Mental Retardation Authority of Harris County seek s mandamus review of the trial court ’ s June 26,
2012 order requiring MHMRA to provide court

- ordered outpatient mental

- health2

treatment to R.B. 1 We deny the petition for writ of mandamus and dismiss all pending motions as moot

. PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief J ustice Radack and Jus tices Bland and Huddle. Do not publish. T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).

1 The underlying proceeding is case No. 0690479, in the 184th District Court of Harris County, the Honorable Jan Krocker, presiding

.