J-S25033-16; J-S25034-16

NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. WILLIAM JOHN LITTLE Appellant No. 1449 WDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence August 14, 201 5 In the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-26-CR-0001527-2014
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee

v. WILLIAM JOHN LITTLE Appellant No. 1451 WDA 2015

Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence August 14, 201 5 In the Court of Common Pleas of Fayette County Criminal Division at No(s): CP-26-CR-0000547-2014
BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., MUNDY, J., and JENKIN S, J. MEMORANDUM BY JENKINS, J.: FILED APRIL 08, 2016 Appellant William John Little appeals from the Aug ust 14, 2015 judgments of sentence entered at two docket numbers in the Fayette County Court of Common Pleas. We quash this appeal. On September 20, 2014, Appellant pled guilty to ch arges filed at two docket numbers. At docket CP-26-CR-0001527-2014, A ppellant pled guiltyJ-S25033-16; J-S25034-16

- 2 - to criminal trespass – defiant trespasser, 1 conspiracy – theft from a motor vehicle, 2 theft from a motor vehicle, 3 receiving stolen property, 4 and possession of drug paraphernalia. 5 At docket CP-26-CR-0000547-2014, Appellant pled guilty to driving under the influenc e (“DUI”) (highest rate, first offense), 6 unauthorized use of automobile, 7 accidents involving damage to attended vehicle or property, 8 driving while operating privilege is suspended or revoked, 9 and additional summary traffic offenses. 10 On December 9, 2014, the trial court sentenced App ellant at both dockets. At docket CP-26-CR-0001527-2014, Appellant received a sentence of 12 months’ intermediate punishment, with 6 month s to be served on house arrest with electronic monitoring, on the the ft from a motor vehicle

____________________________________________
1 18 Pa.C.S. § 3503(b)(1)(iii).

2 18 Pa.C.S. § 903(c).

3 18 Pa.C.S. § 3934(a).

4 18 Pa.C.S. § 3925(a).

5 35 P.S. § 780-113(a)(32).

6 75 Pa.C.S. § 3802(b).

7 18 Pa.C.S. § 3928.

8 75 Pa.C.S. § 3743(a).

9 75 Pa.C.S. § 1543(a).

10 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 3322, 3714(a), 3736(a), 3744(a).J-S25033-16; J-S25034-16

- 3 - conviction. At docket CP-26-CR-0000547-2014, Appel lant received a sentence of 6 months’ intermediate punishment, with 12 days to be served on house arrest with electronic monitoring, on the DUI conviction and a consecutive one-year term of probation for the unau thorized use of an automobile conviction. The trial court ordered Appe llant to pay all costs associated with the intermediate punishment program

. 11 On February 18, 2015, the trial court entered an o rder revoking Appellant’s intermediate punishment because Appella nt failed to make his first installment payment for electronic monitoring . The trial court resentenced Appellant at both dockets. At docket CP- 26-CR-0001527-2014, the trial court sentenced Appellant to 6-12 months’ intermediate punishment, with at least 6 months to be served at the Genesis House treatment center, for the theft from a motor vehicl e conviction. At docket CP-26-CR-000547-2014, the trial court sentenced App ellant to 48 hours to 6 months’ imprisonment for the DUI conviction and one year of probation for the unauthorized use of an automobile conviction. Appellant left Genesis House, without permission, s hortly after his admittance. On August 14, 2015, the trial court re voked Appellant’s sentence of intermediate punishment, revoked Appell ant’s probation and parole, and re-sentenced Appellant.

____________________________________________
11 No further penalty was imposed for the remaining c onvictions.J-S25033-16; J-S25034-16

- 4 - At docket CP-26-CR-0001527-2014, the trial court se ntenced Appellant to 6 to 12 months’ imprisonment for the theft from a motor vehicle
conviction. 12 At CP-26-CR-0000547-2014, the trial court sentenc ed Appellant to 48 hours to 6 months’ imprisonment for the DUI conviction and a concurrent sentence of 1 to 2 years’ imprisonment for the unauthorized use of an automobile conviction. He received credi t for two days he spent in prison in February. The aggregate sentence imposed was 1.5 to 3 years’ imprisonment. On September 18, 2015, Appellant filed notices of a ppeal at both docket numbers. 13 Appellant and the trial court complied with Penns ylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure 1925. We must first address the timeliness of this appeal . Following revocation of intermediate punishment, probation, o r parole, the filing of a post-sentence motion does not toll the time period for the filing of an appeal. Pa.R.Crim.P. 708(E). This Court has explained:

Rule 720 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Criminal Proc edure in general governs the timing of post-sentence moti on procedures and appeals. See Pa.R.Crim.P. 720. The disposition of a motion to modify a sentence impose d after a revocation hearing, however, is governed by Rule 708 (Violation of Probation, Intermediate Punishment, o r

____________________________________________ 12 The trial court imposed this sentence consecutive to the sentence imposed at docket CP-26-CR-0000547-2014.

13 This Court has consolidated the cases on appeal.J-S25033-16; J-S25034-16

- 5 - Parole: Hearing and Disposition). See Pa.R.Crim.P. 720 Comment. Rule 708(E) states: “A motion to modify a sentence imposed after a revocation shall be filed within 10 days of the date of imposition. The filing of a motion to modify sentence will not toll the 30–day appeal per iod.” Pa.R.Crim.P. 708(E) (emphasis added). Rule 708 make s clear Rule 720 does not apply to revocation cases. Id. Comment. See also Commonwealth v. Parlante , 823 A.2d 927, 929 (Pa.Super.2003) (internal citation om itted) (stating: “An appellant whose revocation of probati on sentence has been imposed after a revocation procee ding has 30 days to appeal her sentence from the day her sentence is [imposed], regardless of whether . . . she files a post-sentence motion. Therefore, if an appellant chooses to file a motion to modify her revocation sentence, she does not receive an additional 30 days to file an a ppeal from the date her motion is denied”). Commonwealth v. Burks , 102 A.3d 497, 500 (Pa.Super.2014) (emphasis deleted). 14 The trial court sentenced Appellant on August 14, 2015. Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until September 18, 2 015, more than thirty days after the entry of the judgment of sentence. 15 Accordingly, Appellant did not timely appeal the judgment of sentence. Appeal quashed.

____________________________________________
14 This Court can raise an issue regarding the timeli ness of an appeal sua sponte

. Burks , 102 A.3d at 500.

15 Thirty days from the August 14, 2015 judgment of s entence was Sunday, September 13, 2015. Appellant had until Monday, Se ptember 14, 2015 to file a timely notice of appeal. See Pa.R.A.P. 903(a) (notice of appeal “shall be filed within 30 days after the entry of the orde r from which the appeal is taken”); 1 Pa.C.S.A. § 1908 (excluding weekends and holidays from the computation of time when the last day of the time p eriod falls on a weekend or holiday).J-S25033-16; J-S25034-16

- 6 - Judgment Entered.

Joseph D. Seletyn, Esq. Prothonotary

Date: 4/8/2016