alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED NO VEMBER 27, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00042

- CR

Cleveland Clark, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 331ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JU STICES PURYEAR AND F IELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE FIELD

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction signed by the tr i a l court on December 1 , 2011.

Havi ng reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the judgment of

conviction

.

Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 06-301 Date: February 24, 2006 

Subject: March 2006 Headcount 

This is a reminder for you to submit your semiannual Headcount for the March 2006 reporting period. 

The Headcount is reported semiannually (March and September) by all payroll providers that withhold 

monies from salaries for participants in the Civil Service Retirement System, Federal Employees 

Retirement System, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and/or the Federal Employees Group 

Life Insurance Programs. 

The March 2006 Headcount will be for the payroll paid during the first 15 days of March 2006. If you pay 

twice during the first 15 days of March, the Headcount will be for the first payroll paid during that period. 

For example, if you pay your employees on March 1st and March 15th, the first payroll paid will be used 

for your Headcount (March 1st). For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period will be February 1, through 

February 28, 2006. 

The March 2006 Headcount must be submitted no later than March 20th. We ask that you notify us if you 

anticipate a delay or any difficulties in submitting it by that date. Under no circumstances, however, 

should you delay transmitting your normal RITS report because your Headcount is not ready to be 

submitted. 

Please fax (using clear, legible originals) your OPM Forms 1523 and SF 2812-A to us at 202-606-0701 

or you may email your forms to either Patricia Dickey at padickey@opm.gov or Yvonne Fields at 

ycfields@opm.gov. 

OMB Bulletin No. 01-02 -- Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements - requires payroll 

providers to have performed by their auditors agreed-upon procedures to assist OPM in assessing the 

reasonableness of withholdings and contributions and Headcount reporting. Due to the requirement that 

annual financial statements be published by November 15, your auditors will need to perform the agreedupon procedures using the March 2006 Headcount. To provide for this, it is critical that you retain in a 

secure and easily accessible environment all automated and hard-copy files supporting the March 2006 

Headcount. This is essential even if you will transfer the responsibility for payroll services to another 

provider during or soon after the end of FY 2006.

If you have any questions concerning the preparation of your Headcount report, please call our Funds 

Management Branch at 202-606-4118. 

 

Robert Loring, Chief 

 Financial Reporting and Policy Group 

Center for Financial Services
#### T. F. DAVIS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20648.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

T. O. Murray, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, *Judge.*

The appellant was convicted of driving an automobile upon a public highway while intoxicated, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $50 and five days imprisonment in the county jail.

Since his appeal to this court was perfected, the appellant has filed a written request», verified by his affidavit, asking for the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted, and the appeal ordered dismissed.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 June 26, 2007
 ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY INC.
  Delaware
    
    001-02199
    
    39-0126090(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (Commission File
Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 5075 Westheimer 
Suite 890Houston, Texas
    
    77056(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 713) 369-0550
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
   Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Slide show presentation to be presented by the Company
on June 26, 2007 at the 17th Annual Wachovia Nantucket
Equity Conference.
   ALLIS-CHALMERS ENERGY INC.Date:  June 26, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Theodore F. Pound IIIName:
    Theodore F. Pound IIITitle:
    General Counsel and
Secretary




---



##### 



ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Slide show presentation to be presented by the Company
on June 26, 2007 at the 17th Annual Wachovia Nantucket
Equity Conference.
#### TERRELL v. STATE.

No. 17197.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 2, 1935.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the reference to our firm under the caption “Experts” and to the use of our reportdated February 28, 2007, in the Registration Statement (Form S-4) and related Prospectus of CalDive International Inc. for the registration of 20,383,885 shares of its common stock.     /s/ Ernst & Young LLPHouston, Texas
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 12

- 151 24
Agency No

. 12

- CA

- 026758

AMBASSADOR SERVICES, INC. , Petitioner

- Cross

- Respondent ,
versus NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD , Respondent

- Cross

- Petitioner

.

Petitions for Review of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board
(November 15, 2013) Before HULL and ANDERSON , Circuit Judges , and MOTZ , * District Judge

. PER CURIAM :

* Honorable J. Frederick Motz, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland , sitting by designation.

Case: 12-15124 Date Filed: 11/15/2013 Page: 1 of 32 Ambassador Services, Inc. (“Ambassador”) petitions this Court for review of the National Labor Relations Board ’s Decision and Order , which found Ambassador in violation of S ections 8( a)(1) and 8(a)(5) of the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 158 (a)( 1 ), ( 5 )

. The Board cross

petitions for enforcement of its order. On appeal, Ambassador asserts that the Board lacked a quorum to issue its order because

— at the time that the Board issued its decision and order

— three of the Board’s five members were intra

- session recess appointments made without Senate consent. We first conclude that A mbassador did not waive the right to raise the issue of the Board’s authority to act . As to the Board’s authority to act, we do not write on a clean slate given our precedent in Evans v. Stephens

. See 387 F.3d 1220 (11th Cir. 2004) (en banc) (interpreting the Constitution’s Recess Appointments Clause) . While there are certainly some di fferences between this Court’s opinion in Evans and this case, t he reasoning in Evans persuades us that Ambassador’s quorum claim lacks merit and that the authority of the Board to act does not affect our subject matter jurisdiction over the merits issues in this case

. See Evans , 387 F.3d at 1222 n.1, 1224

- 27 ; see also NLRB v. RELCO Locomotives, Inc. , No. 12

- 2111,

--- F.3d

---- , 2013 WL 4420775 , *26

- 28 (8th Cir. Aug. 20, 2013) ; GGNSC Springfield LLC v. NLRB , 721 F.3d 403, 40 6

- 07 (6th Cir. 2013)

. Case: 12-15124 Date Filed: 11/15/2013 Page: 2 of 33 Proceeding to the merits , Ambassador claims that substantial evidence did not support the Board ’s decisions that

• John Martin was a statutory supervisor;

• Donnie May’s conduct violated NLRA § 8(a)(1) ;

• Ambassador’s safety rule prohibiting “walking off the job” violat ed NLRA § 8(a)(1);

• Ambassador did not establish that a majority of employees signed the decertification petition; and

• Ambassador unlawfully failed and refused to recognize and bargain with the Union. After oral argument and careful consideration of the en tire record and all of the merits issues, we conclude that substantial evidence support ed the Board’s determinations. Thus, we affirm the Board’s decision and grant the Board’s petition for enforcement. For the foregoing reasons, we DENY Ambassador’s peti tion for review and GRANT the Board’s cross

- petition for enforcement of its order in full.

Case: 12-15124 Date Filed: 11/15/2013 Page: 3 of 3
[No. 24716-0-II.

Division Two.

December 1, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. David Lee Paige, Jr., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 98-1-05374-9, Vicki L. Hogan, J., entered May 20, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Wang, J., concurred in by Hunt, A.C.J., and Seinfeld, J.
The HFIR reactor during a routine refueling. While submerged, the 

spent fuel emits a blue glow known as Cherenkov radiation.

A little history on a big deal

The reactor celebrated 55 years in August 

2020. It was constructed to fulfill the need 

for producing “heavy” elements such as 

plutonium and curium.

Today, HFIR has four primary missions: 

• Neutron scattering 

• Isotope production 

• Irradiation materials testing 

• Neutron activation analysis 

High Flux Isotope Reactor

Celebrating 55 years of Big Science
HFIR operates with high predictability

HFIR runs seven 24-day cycles of neutron 

production, and the intense neutron flux and 

constant power density are used by more 

than 500 researchers each year. 

One Bethel Valley Road

Oak Ridge, TN 37830

Office: 865-574-0058

neutrons.ornl.gov

Managed by UT-Battelle LLC for the US Department of Energy

What’s the High Flux Isotope 

Reactor (HFIR) at Oak Ridge 

National Laboratory (ORNL)? 

It’s a pretty big deal.

It is:

• the most powerful reactor-based 

source of neutrons in the United States

• one of the nation’s top facilities in 

producing medical- and industrygrade isotopes

• a large facility with a small core 

(2 feet tall and 15 inches in diameter)

• a swimming pool reactor, which 

is under tens of feet of water to 

provide cover from the neutrons 

and gamma rays

• the western world’s only supplier 

of Californium-252, an isotope used 

for well-logging and industrial 

scanning, as well as a neutron 

source for starting up reactors

• used to produce actinium-227 for 

treating cancer, and nickel-63 for 

detecting explosives 

• a producer of plutonium-238, an 

isotope used to power NASA space 

missions, used most recently in the 

MARS Rover User program 

It has a user program, with two annual calls for proposals. 

Submissions are peer-reviewed by external panels, with 

recommendations based on scientific and technological impact, 

feasibility, and safety. 

HFIR’s neutron scattering research facilities contain a world-class 

collection of instruments used for fundamental and applied research 

on the structure and dynamics of matter. 

The thermal and cold neutrons produced by HFIR are used to study 

physics, chemistry, materials science, engineering, and biology. 

Its capabilities enable the exploration of the molecular and magnetic 

structures and behaviors of materials including high-temperature 

superconductors, polymers, metals, and biological samples. 

20-G01335/jdh
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Richard S. Pzena, certifythat:

 

1. I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Pzena Investment Management, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge,this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
|   | /s/  Richard S.  Pzena |
|--------|----------------------------------|
|   | Name:                            | Richard S. Pzena |
|   | Title:                           | Chief Executive Officer |

 

Dated: May 14, 2008

 

----
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6241 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6241

**Commission Decision of 21/06/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6241 - CIE MANAGEMENT II / GRUPPO COIN) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels ,

PUBLIC VERSION C(2011)4543

SIMPLIFIED MERGER PROCEDURE

To the notifying party: | |

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6241 - CIE MANAGEMENT II/ GRUPPO COIN Commission decision pursuant to Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1]

1. On 16.05.2011, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking CIE Management II Limited ("CIE") (Guernsey) controlled by BC Partners Holdings, acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Giorgione Investimenti SpA ("Giorgione ", Italy) by way of purchase of shares [2] .

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for CIE: general partner and manager or attorney of the BC Funds (which are private equity investment funds);

- for Giorgione: holding company of Gruppo Coin SpA, a distributor, retailer and manufacturer of apparel, accessories, health and beauty products and home decorations.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [3] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 155, 21.05.2011, p.19

[3] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 345 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 345

 To make persons who conspire to commit, commit, or benefit from an act 
 of human trafficking ineligible for admission to the United States of 
                                America.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 14, 2015

 Mr. Grayson introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To make persons who conspire to commit, commit, or benefit from an act 
 of human trafficking ineligible for admission to the United States of 
                                America.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. GROUND OF INADMISSABILITY FOR TRAFFICKING.

    Section 212(a)(2)(H)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)(H)(i)) is amended by striking ``who commits or 
conspires to commit human trafficking offenses'' and inserting ``who 
commits or conspires to commit a human trafficking offense''.

SEC. 2. PERMANENT EXCLUSION OF PERSONS WHO HAVE BENEFITED FROM ILLICIT 
              ACTIVITIES OF TRAFFICKERS IN PERSONS.

    Section 212(a)(2)(H)(ii) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 
U.S.C. 1182(a)(2)(H)(ii)) is amended by striking ``has, within the 
previous 5 years, obtained any financial or other benefit from the 
illicit activity'' and inserting ``has obtained any financial or other 
benefit from the illicit activity''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
      32




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
        connection with the quarterly report of Adrenalina (the "Company") on Form
        10-Q
        for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), we, Ilia Lekach, Chief Executive
        Officer, and Michael Labinski, Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
        Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
        of
        2002 that:




(1)
      This
      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Ilia Lekach
            
            
            /s/
                Michael LabinskiIlia
                Lekach
              Chief
                Executive Officer
            
            
            Michael
                Labinski
              Chief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                October 17, 2008
            
            
            Date:
                October 17, 2008
United States

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 21-304 Date: August 2021 

Subject: Changes to Agency Contributions for the Federal Employees Retirement System 

This letter is to provide notice of the revised normal cost percentages for employees covered by 

the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS) Act of 1986. The revised normal cost 

percentages, as described in the enclosed Tables, are effective at the beginning of the first pay 

period commencing on or after October 1, 2021 and affect agencies’ contribution rates for FERS 

employees, FERS Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-RAE) and FERS- Further Revised 

Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE). Agency appeals of the normal cost percentages must be filed 

no later than September 29, 2021. 

If you have questions about the new rates, please email your inquiries to

FinancialBALs@opm.gov.

Sherri D. Jordan 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services 

Enclosed
2

Enclosed 

FERS Contribution Rates 

Category CPDF Code 

Oct – 2020 

Agency %

Oct – 2021 

Agency %

Regular K 17.3 18.4 

Law Enforcement Officer, Firefighter, Member of the 

Supreme Court Police M 35.8 37.6 

Air Traffic Controller L 35.7 37.5 

Military Reserve Tech N 20.1 21.1 

Customs and Border Protection Officers O 35.8 37.6 

CIA Special Overseas NONE 24.8 26.2 

Member of Congress NONE 23.1 24.3 

Congressional Employee** NONE 24.3 25.8 

Capitol Police** NONE 35.8 37.6 

Employees of US Postal Service - Regular NONE 15.7 16.2 

Employees of US Postal Service - Law Enforcement NONE 35.8 37.6 

FERS-RAE Contribution Rates

Category CPDF Code 

Oct – 2020

Agency %

Oct – 2021

Agency %

Regular KR 15.5 16.6 

Law Enforcement Officer, Firefighter, Member of 

the Supreme Court Police MR 34.0 35.8 

Air Traffic Controller LR 33.9 35.8

Military Reserve Tech NR 18.2 19.3 

Customs and Border Protection Officers OR 34.0 35.8 

CIA Special Overseas NONE 23.1 24.5 

Member of Congress* NONE 15.5 16.6 

Congressional Employee* NONE 15.5 16.6 

Capitol Police** NONE 34.0 35.8 

Employees of US Postal Service - Regular NONE 13.8 14.4 

Employees of US Postal Service - Law Enforcement NONE 34.0 35.8 

* RAE and FRAE Members and Staff receive Regular benefits. 

** Separate NC% for Capitol Police versus other Congress EEs, per P.L. 116-94. 
3

FERS-FRAE Contribution Rates

Category CPDF Code 

Oct - 2020

Agency %

Oct - 2021

Agency %

Regular KF 15.5 16.6

Law Enforcement Officer, Firefighter, Member of 

the Supreme Court Police MF 34.0 35.8

Air Traffic Controller LF 33.9 35.8

Military Reserve Tech NF 18.2 19.3

Customs and Border Protection Officers OF 34.0 35.8

CIA Special Overseas NONE 23.1 24.5

Member of Congress* NONE 15.5 16.6

Congressional Employee* NONE 15.5 16.6

Capitol Police** NONE 34.0 35.8

Employees of US Postal Service - Regular NONE 12.7 13.4

Employees of US Postal Service - Law Enforcement NONE 32.9 34.7

* RAE and FRAE Members and Staff receive Regular benefits. 

** Separate NC% for Capitol Police versus other Congress EEs, per P.L. 116-94.