alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### VALLEY DEVELOPMENTS, Inc., v. LAMB et ux.

No. 8876.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Oct. 19, 1932.

Carter & Stiernberg, of Harlingen, for appellant.'

II. B. Galbraith, of Brownsville, and H. R. Maxwell, of Harlingen, for appellees.

SMITH, J.

On March 9,1929, E. E. Lamb and wife purchased a tract of 14.26 acres of land in Cameron county from Valley Developments, Inc., for a consideration of $15,400, payable partly in cash, and partly on time. About a year afterwards Lamb became dissatisfied with his purchase, claiming that the selling agent of his vendor had misrepresented the quality of the land, and thereby deceived him into making the purchase. He complained to thc president of the corporation, and, as a result of the ensuing negotiations, the two entered into an agreement whereby the corporation was bound to make certain improvements upon the land in settlement of the purchaser s claims. This agreement of settlement was reduced to writing and accepted by Lamb, who, nevertheless, thereafter filed this suit for rescission, or, in the alternative for damages, based upon the charges of fraud previously made by Lamb. Upon a trial the count for rescission went out of the case, but the trial court, disregarding the pleading and proof of settlement, submitted the case for damages, and, upon jury findings, rendered judgment *687in favor of Lamb for some $6,500. Tbe corporation, Valley Developments, Inc., has appealed. Appellees bave not contested tbe appeal, either by brief or oral argument.

Appellant presents numerous assignments and propositions, but we see no occasion to discuss more than tbe controlling contention that appellees were precluded by tbe settlement and tbe performance of tbe conditions thereof by appellant. That agreement was expressed in tbe plainest terms, in writing, was accepted by appellees unequivocally and irrevocably, and thereby became tbe measure of tbe rights and liabilities of tbe parties.

It is undisputed that appellant fully performed tbe conditions of tbe settlement, but, even if it bad defaulted thereon, appellees’ remedy therefor lay in a suit for damages for breach of that agreement, and not in a suit for damages for deceit practiced upon them by appellant in tbe original transaction.

Tbe evidence of tbe settlement is undisputed, is conclusive, was apparently fully developed below, and by force of its effect tbe trial court should bave directed a verdict for appellant, and rendered appropriate judgment thereon.

Tbe judgment is reversed, and judgment here rendered that appellees take nothing by their suit, and pay all costs of tbe litigation.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geovic Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Greg Hill, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                  
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | ---------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Greg Hill                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | Greg Hill Chief Financial
Officer
Page | 1

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY, MARYLAND 

City Code City

240021033 ACCOKEEK

240022033 ADELPHI

240025033 ANDREWS AFB

240029033 ARDMORE

240031033 AQUASCO

240039033 AVONDALE

240086033 BEAVER HEIGHTS

240100033 BELTSVILLE

240108033 BERKSHIRE

240120033 BERWYN HEIGHTS

240150033 BLADENSBURG

240166033 BOULEVARD HEIGHTS

240170033 BOWIE

240171033 BRADBURY HEIGHTS

240175033 BRANDYWINE

240180033 BRENTWOOD

240228033 CALVERTON

240235033 CAMP SPRINGS

240240033 CAPITOL HEIGHTS

240246033 CARMODY HILLS

240278033 CHAPEL OAKS

240285033 CHELTENHAM

240320033 CHEVERLY

240335033 CHILLUM

240365033 CLINTON

240370033 COLLEGE PARK

240374033 COLUMBIA PARK

240380033 COLMAR MANOR

240383033 CORAL HILLS

240390033 COTTAGE CITY

240402033 CROOM

240447033 DILLON PARK

240450033 DISTRICT HTS

240460033 EAGLE HARBOR

240499033 EDITORS PARK

240500033 EDMONSTON

240550033 FAIRMOUNT HTS

240565033 FORT WASHINGTON

240569033 FORESTVILLE

240570033 FOREST HEIGHTS

240574033 FORT FOOTE VILLAGE

240579033 FORT WASHINGTON FOREST

240589033 FRIENDLY
Page | 2

City Code City

240668033 GLASSMANOR

240670033 GLENARDEN

240675033 GLENDALE HEIGHTS

240684033 GLENN DALE

240710033 GREENBELT

240717033 GREEN MEADOWS

240805033 HILLCREST HEIGHTS

240812033 HILLSIDE

240830033 HYATTSVILLE

240859033 KETTERING

240861033 KENTLAND

240879033 LANDOVER

240880033 LANDOVER HILLS

240882033 LANGLEY PARK

240885033 LANHAM

240888033 LANHAM/SEABROOK

240896033 LARGO

240900033 LAUREL

240932033 LEWISDALE

240983033 MARLOW HEIGHTS

240991033 MARYLAND PARK

240998033 MIDDLETON FARM

241022033 MITCHELLVILLE

241024033 MONPELLER

241030033 MORNINGSIDE

241060033 MOUNT RAINIER

241077033 MUIRKIRK

241081033 NATIONAL MARITIME INTELLIGENCE CENTER, SUITLAND

241084033 NAYLOR

241089033 NEW CARROLLTON

241120033 NORTH BRENTWOOD

241135033 NORTH ENGLEWOOD

241175033 OXON HILL

241183033 PALMER PARK

241210033 PISCATAWAY

241271033 POTOMAC VISTA

241293033 QUINCY MANOR

241294033 RADIANT VALLEY

241326033 RITCHIE

241330033 RIVERDALE

241332033 RIVERDALE HEIGHTS

241357033 ROGERS HEIGHTS

241397033 SEABROOK

241400033 SEAT PLEASANT

241444033 SILESIA
Page | 3

City Code City

241445033 SILVER HILL

241494033 SPRINGDALE

241499033 SPRINGDALE GARDENS

241520033 SUITLAND

241540033 TAKOMA PARK

241553033 TANTALLON

241558033 TEMPLE HILLS

241594033 TUXEDO

241610033 UNIVERSITY PARK

241620033 UPPER MARLBORO

241664033 WEST LANHAM HILLS

241672033 WESTWOOD
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk December 21, 2009

1214 

# Order

December 21, 2009

139644-5

DR. KUO-CHUN CHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139644 COA: 283420 Wayne CC: 97-728411-CZ WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

DR. KUO-CHUN CHEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 139645 COA: 283575 Wayne CC: 97-016809-CM WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY, DR. JACK LILIEN, DR. STANLEY GANGWERE, and DR. P. DENNIS SMITH, Defendants-Appellees.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 2, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2012-C, does hereby certify that:

 

1.             NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.             The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.             This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.             A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.             To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014.

 

6.             IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2015.

 

----

 

March 30, 2015

 
|   | By:    | /s/   Brett D. Davis |
|--------|--------|----------------------|
|   | Name:  | Brett   D. Davis     |
|   | Title: | President            |

 

----
# C_2011056EN.01000101.xml

| 22.2.2011 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 56/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2011

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/1

---

COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION

of 15 February 2011

on the appointment of a member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank

2011/C 56/01

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 283(2) and 139(2)(h) thereof, and Articles 11.2 and 42.3 of the Protocol on the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank,

HEREBY RECOMMENDS TO THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL:

To appoint Mr Peter PRAET as member of the Executive Board of the European Central Bank for a term of office of eight years with effect from 1 June 2011.

Done at Brussels, 15 February 2011.

For the Council

The President

MATOLCSY Gy.

---
OalGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

DA 22-0065 

L. CRAIG SEMENZA, A?R 0 4 2023 

Petitioner and Appellant, 

v. 

HOLLISTER A. LARSON, et al., and HOLLY 

JEAN LARSON, both individually and collectively 

d/b/a FIRST & MAIN BUILDING, 

Respondents and Appellees. 

BovvE-. n G ,er wood 

ci, - emo COUll 

State r.“ lvlontana 

ORDER 

On February 21, 2023, we issued an opinion in the above-entitled action, affirming 

the District Court's dismissal of Semenza's case for failure to prosecute. Semenza v. 

Larson, 2023 MT 32N. Semenza has petitioned for rehearing. 

M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a) provides that a petition for rehearing will be considered only 

when the Court "overlooked some fact material to the decision," when "it overlooked some 

question presented by counsel that would have proven decisive to the case," or when "its 

decision conflicts with a statute or controlling decision not addressed" by the Court. 

Having fully considered Semenza's petition, we conclude that rehearing is not warranted 

under the standards of M. R. App. P. 20(1)(a). 

Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is DENIED. 

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail copies of this Order to L. Craig Semenza and 

all counsel of record. 

DATED this LI day of April, 2023. 

04/04/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0065
~
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Served: October 6

, 20 1 4

NOTICE

On October 2, 20 14, American Airlines, Inc. (American) filed a motion requesting that

the Department withdraw one daily U.S.

- Haneda slot pair from Delta Air Lines, Inc.

(Delta); and an application to reallocate that slot pair to American.

Under the Department’s regulat ions, answers to motion s are due within seven business

days after the filing, while answers to application s are due within 15 days after filing. 1

With respect to American’s October 2, 2014 motion and application, answers would

normally be due October 14 a nd October 17, respectively.

To simplify the administrative filing process , we have decided to extend the due date for

answers to the motion portion of American’s filing to coincide with the due date for

answers to the application portion . Accordingly, answers to American’s October 2, 2014,

submission in this Docket shall be due on October 17, 2014. Replies to answers may

address both the motion and the application and will be due on October 28, 2014.

We will serve this notice by electronic mail on al l certificated U.S. combination carriers

operating large aircraft; the U.S. Department of State (Office of Aviation Negotiations);

the Federal Aviation Administration; and the Ambassador of Japan in Washington, D.C.

By:

PAUL L. GRETCH

Director, Office of International Aviation

(SEAL)

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http://www.regulations.gov

1 14 CFR 302.8, 302.11(c), and 302.307. U.S.

- Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding

Docket DOT

- OST

- 2010

- 0018
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 18-306 Date: November 2018 

Subject: Calendar Year 2019 Interest Rate

The U.S. Treasury has announced the calendar year 2019 interest rate is 2.750 percent. This rate is 

applicable to “post-1956” military service credit accounts. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management 

(OPM) also will apply this rate to civilian service credit and voluntary contribution accounts. 

Employing agencies must assess interest on the unpaid balance in post-1956 military service credit 

accounts on an employee’s “interest accrual date” (IAD), and interest is compounded annually.

The actual interest rate applied is a “composite” rate, based on the rates in effect during the 12-month 

period preceding the IAD. Thus, it has components of both the current and previous year’s interest rates. 

For instance, the rate applied on October 1, 2019, reflects a composite interest rate of 2.594 percent [three 

months (October 1 to December 31, 2018) at 2.125 percent and nine months (January 1 to September 30, 

2019) at 2.750 percent]. 

Chapter 23 of the Civil Service Retirement System/Federal Employees Retirement System (CSRS/FERS) 

Handbook contains guidance for computing interest on military service credit deposits, including the 

determination of the IAD and the formula for composite interest rates. It is available at 

http://www.opm.gov/retire/pubs/handbook/hod.htm. For your convenience, we have attached a PDF 

file formatted spreadsheet containing the composite interest rates for each IAD through December 31, 

2019. 

To reduce the unpaid balance in a military service credit account prior to the assessment of additional 

interest, a remittance must be received on time. To be considered timely, remittances must be physically 

in the possession of the agency official authorized to receive them by the close of business on the last 

business day before the IAD. Thus, for deposits sent by mail, the date on the postmark does not constitute 

the date of remittance. 

If you have questions about this letter, please send an email to FinancialBALs@opm.gov or call us on 

202-606-0606. We look forward to assisting you. 

 Tonya R. Johnson

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services

Attachment
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

May 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

132334 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 132334 

 COA: 260165 

Berrien CC: 04-401613-FC 

WILLIE JOE DEPRIEST, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p0425 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 2, 2007 

 Clerk
**Exhibit 31.2**I, J. Michael Mayer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Complete Production Services, Inc.(the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e)and 15d – 15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 3, 2007 By:  /s/ J. Michael Mayer    J. Michael Mayer         Senior Vice President and
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Christian Mancillas, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Rosca, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of Rosca, Inc.


Date: 7/29/09                              By: /s/ Christian Mancillas
                                              ----------------------------------
                                           Name:  Christian Mancillas
                                           Title: Chief Financial Officer
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  PARKER DRILLING COMPANY
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    1-7573
    
    73-0618660(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 1401 Enclave Parkway, Suite 600
Houston, Texas 77077
 (281) 406-2000
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 8.01 Other Events
  Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
      PARKER DRILLING COMPANYDated:  August 17, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Ronald C. PotterRonald C. PotterVice President




---



#####
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

 

Reference is hereby made to that certainPooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, by and among RBSCommercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian,Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as SpecialServicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and U.S. BankNational Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C9 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of thisAgreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of Commercial Mortgage Servicesdo hereby certify that:

 

1.       Areview of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.       Tothe best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned hasexecuted this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2019.

 

 

/s/Leslie Hayton

LeslieHayton

ManagingDirector

WellsFargo Bank

 

 

| Wells  Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|