alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.3


 





AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This AMENDMENT NO.
1 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Amendment”) is effective as of August 4, 2014 by and between SpendSmart Networks,
Inc. f/k/a The SpendSmart Payments Company, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Alex Minicucci (the “Executive”).


 


W I T N E
S S E T H:


 


WHEREAS, the Company
and Executive entered into an employment agreement effective February 11, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”) pursuant
to which the Executive was employed by the Company upon the terms and conditions contained therein; and


 


WHEREAS, the parties
desire to amend certain provisions of the Employment Agreement as set forth below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the mutual promises and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, each of the parties agree with the others as follows:


 


1.                 
Section 3(a) of the Employment Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


 


“3. Compensation.


 


a.                  
Base Salary. The Company shall pay the Executive during the Term a salary at a minimum rate of Four Hundred Fifty
Thousand Dollars ($450,000) per annum (the “Base Salary”), in accordance with the customary payroll practices
of the Company. The Company shall be entitled to withhold from any payments any amount of tax withholding it determines to be required
by law.”


 


2.                 
Except as herein amended, the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.


 


3.                 
This Amendment may be signed in counterparts with the same effect as if the signature on each counterpart were upon the
same instrument. In the event that any signature is delivered by facsimile transmission or by e-mail delivery of a “.pdf”
format data file, such signature shall create a valid and binding obligation of the party executing (or on whose behalf such signature
is executed) with the same force and effect as if such facsimile or “.pdf” signature page were an original thereof.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written.


 


	SPENDSMART NETWORKS, INC.	EXECUTIVE
	 	 
	By: /s/ Bill Hernandez	By: /s/ Alex Minicucci
	Name: Bill Hernandez	Name: Alex Minicucci 
	Title: President
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 03-208 Date: October 21, 2003 

Subject: Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance: New Option B Premiums

Purpose 

The purpose of this Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) is to transmit new premiums for the upper 

age bands for Option B coverage under the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI). 

Background 

In BAL 02-209, issued September 25, 2002, we announced additional age bands for Option B and 

stated that the premiums for these age bands would be phased in over a three-year period; that BAL 

also announced the premiums for Phase I. This BAL announces the premiums for Phase II of the 

phase-in. 

New Premiums 

These are the new Option B premiums: 

Age Band Biweekly 

per $1,000 of coverage 

Monthly 

per $1,000 of coverage 

70-74 $1.03 $2.232

75-79 $1.43 $3.098

80 and over $1.83 $3.965 

These are the only FEGLI premiums that are changing at this time. 

Effective Date 

The new Option B premiums are effective January 1, 2004. Payroll offices must apply the new 

premiums the first pay period beginning on or after that date. 

Publication and Notification 
OPM is publishing the new premiums in a Federal Register notice. The premiums are also on the 

FEGLI web site (www.opm.gov/insure/life). 

OPM’s Financial Reporting and Policy Group will notify payroll offices of the new Option B 

premiums through a BAL in the 300 series. 

We strongly encourage agencies to notify their affected employees in advance of the increase. 

We will issue another BAL next year with the Option B premiums for Phase III. 

 Abby L. Block 

 Deputy Associate Director 

 Center for Employee

 and Family Support Policy 

2
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3665 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3665

 To authorize appropriations for the university transportation centers 
  program for fiscal years 2016 through 2021, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 1, 2015

  Mr. Curbelo of Florida (for himself, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Rangel, Mr. 
 Thompson of Pennsylvania, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Farenthold, Mr. 
   Capuano, and Mr. Sires) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, and in 
 addition to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To authorize appropriations for the university transportation centers 
  program for fiscal years 2016 through 2021, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. UNIVERSITY TRANSPORTATION CENTERS PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated out of the 
Highway Trust Fund (other than the Mass Transit Account) to carry out 
the university transportation centers program under section 5505 of 
title 49, United States Code, $72,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2016 
through 2021.
    (b) Administration.--The Federal Highway Administration shall 
administer the program described in subsection (a).
    (c) Applicability of Title 23, United States Code.--Funds 
authorized to be appropriated by subsection (a) shall--
            (1) be available for obligation in the same manner as if 
        those funds were apportioned under chapter 1 of title 23, 
        United States Code;
            (2) remain available until expended; and
            (3) not be transferable.
                                 <all>
```
Order entered November 14, 2019

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 19
- 00181
- CR
PAULO ROGERIO OSTOLI N, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 2 19th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 219
- 82478
- 2017



### O RDER Before the Court is appellant’s November 12, 2019 third motion to extend the time to file appellant’s brief. We GRANT the motion and ORDER appellant’s brief fil ed on or before December 12, 2019 . If appellant’s brief is not filed by December 12, 2019 , this appeal may be abated for the trial court to make findings in accordance with ru le of appellate procedure 38.8.

/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Schwab, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) intentionally omitted;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2008



/s/ John R. SchwabJohn R. SchwabChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE



The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Custodian (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among,  UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,  Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC,  as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from September 27, 2012 (the “Closing Date”) to December 31, 2012 and of such Certifying Servicer’s
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects from the Closing Date to the end of such calendar year.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Custodian



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 11, 2013
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER ON M OTION

November 7, 2008 Revision Cause number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 6 45

- CV

Style: Prophet Ronald Dwayne Whitfield v. Clear Lake Nissan and Santander

Consumer USA, Inc.

Date motion filed * : September 1 4 , 201 5

Type of motion: Amended Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction and

Motions to Strike and for Sanctions

Part ies filing motion: Pro Se Appell a n t

Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion i s :

 Granted

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Although the pro se appellant listed several appellate and trial court cause numbers on

his motion, it was hand written over the typed answer and original counterclaim of a

First Service Credit Union (“FSCU”), and apparently seeks the dismissal o r striking of

FCSU’s answer filed in the unrelated trial court cause number 2015

- 45473. According

to the trial clerk’s website, while FSCU is listed as a defendant and cross

- pla intiff in

No. 2015

- 45473, there has been no notice of appeal filed in that case. Furthermore,

FSCU is neither listed as an appellee nor cross

- appellant in this appellate cause number

01

- 15

- 00645

- CV. Accordingly, appellant’s amended motion to dismiss appeal for

want of jurisdiction and motions to strike and for sanctions is dismissed as moot

because FSCU is not a party to this appeal and has not filed a cross

- appeal

.

Judge's signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes



Date: September 24, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Nitin Karnik, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Tres Estrellas Enterprises' Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter
ended September 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects
the financial condition and results of operations of Tres Estrellas Enterprises,
Inc.


Date: November 11, 2009                By: /s/ Nitin Karnik
                                          --------------------------------------
                                       Name:  Nitin Karnik
                                       Title: Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification
      of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Plastron Acquisition Corp. I (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
      Rapp, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                  Michael RappMichael
                  Rapp
                Principal
                  Executive Officer
                Principal
                  Financial Officer
                July
                  17, 2008
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3451 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make student loans 

dischargeable. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 11 of the United States Code to make student 

loans dischargeable. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Loan Bank5 ruptcy Parity Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXCEPTION TO DISCHARGE. 

7 Section 523(a) of title 11, United States Code, is 

8 amended— 

9 (1) by striking paragraph (8), and 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3451 IH

1 (2) by redesignating paragraphs (9) through 

2 (14B) as paragraphs (8) through (14A), respec3 tively. 

4 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 

5 Title 11, United States Code, is amended— 

6 (1) in section 704(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking 

7 ‘‘(14A)’’ and inserting ‘‘(14)’’, 

8 (2) in section 1106(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking 

9 ‘‘(14A)’’ and inserting ‘‘(14)’’, 

10 (3) in section 1202(c)(1)(C)(iv)(I) by striking 

11 ‘‘(14A)’’ and inserting ‘‘(14)’’, and 

12 (4) in section 1328(a)(2) by striking ‘‘(8), or 

13 (9)’’ and inserting ‘‘or (8)’’. 

14 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE; APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS. 

15 (a) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Except as provided in sub16 section (b), this Act and the amendments made by this 

17 Act shall take effect on the date of the enactment of this 

18 Act. 

19 (b) APPLICATION OF AMENDMENTS.—The amend20 ments made by this Act shall apply only with respect to 

21 cases commenced under title 11 of the United States Code 

22 on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
§ 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Point.360 (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Alan R. Steel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to my knowledge:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of  1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/  Alan R.
  SteelAlan
      R. SteelChief
      Financial OfficerFebruary
      12, 2009
# EUR-Lex - 32011M6067 - EN

Important legal notice

*|*

# 32011M6067

**Commission Decision of 14/01/2011 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.6067 - PAI / SWISSPORT) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic) **

*

*

|EUROPEAN COMMISSION |

Brussels , 14.01.2011

SG-Greffe(2011) D/763

C(2011)199

PUBLIC VERSION

MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION

SIMPLIFIED PROCEDURE

To the notifying party:

Dear Madam(s) and/or Sir(s),

Subject: Case No COMP/M.6067 - PAI/ SWISSPORT Notification of 03.12.2010 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [1] Publication in the Official Journal of the European Union No C 335, 11.12.2010, p.18

1. On 03.12.2010, the European Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of the Merger Regulation by which the undertaking PAI Partners SAS ("PAI", France) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the undertaking Swissport International AG ("Swissport", Switzerland) by way of purchase of shares.

2. The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

- for PAI: private equity fund,

- for Swissport: provision of ground handling services.

3. After examination of the notification, the European Commission has concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the Merger Regulation and of paragraph 5(b) of the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [2] .

4. For the reasons set out in the Notice on a simplified procedure, the European Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the internal market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

For the Commission (signed) Alexander ITALIANER Director General

[1]OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 ("the Merger Regulation"). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ("TFEU") has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of "Community" by "Union" and "common market" by "internal market". The terminology of the TFEU will be used throughout this decision.

[2] OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.
EXHIBIT 32.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with Quarterly Report of Lihua International,
Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “ Company ”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Jianhua Zhu, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13a-14(b)
or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





|Dated: November 9, 2012 | By:    | /s/ Jianhua Zhu        
|----------------------- | ------ | -----------------------
|                        | Name:  | Jianhua Zhu            
|                        | Title: | Chief Executive Officer
Slip Op. 01-17

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

BEFORE: SENIOR JUDGE NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

________________________________________

:

SNR ROULEMENTS; SKF USA INC., :

SKF FRANCE S.A. and SARMA, :

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. : Consol. Court No.

: 97-10-01825

UNITED STATES, :

:

Defendant, :

:

and :

:

THE TORRINGTON COMPANY, :

:

Defendant-Intervenor. :

________________________________________:

JUDGMENT

This Court having received and reviewed the United States

Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s

(“Commerce”) Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court

Remand, SNR Roulements v. United States, 24 CIT ___, 118 F. Supp.

2d 1333 (2000) (“Remand Results”), and Commerce having complied

with the Court’s remand order and no responses to the Remand

Results having been submitted by the parties, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Remand Results filed by Commerce on January

11, 2001 are affirmed in their entirety; and it is further

ORDERED that since all other issues have been decided, this

case is dismissed.

______________________________

NICHOLAS TSOUCALAS

 SENIOR JUDGE

Dated: February 23, 2001

New York, New York
ORIGINAL

IN SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MONTANA

LEONARD HIGGINS,

)

) Cause No. DA 18-0233

)

Appellant, )

) ORDER ON MOTION TO WITHDRAW

vs. ) AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD

)

STATE OF MONTANA, )

Respondent.

)

)

Upon review of the Motion to Withdraw as Attorney of Record, filed by Herman A. Watson, IV,

as counsel for the respondent, Leonard Higgins, in this case, tlic Court now enters the following order:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, that Herman A. Watson, IV, be withdrawn as attorney of record.

2rc4-

Dated this ,j) day Of

cc: [ ] Herman A. Watson, IV

[ ] Steven Gannon, Prosecutor

[ ] Leonard Higgins (via attorney)

, 2020.

HONORABLE MIKE M R

MONTANA SUPRF.ME COURT JUDGE

FILED

APR 03 2020

Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

04/03/2020

Case Number: DA 18-0233