alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION S. 276

For the relief of Sergio Lozano, Fauricio Lozano and Ana Lozano.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

JANUARY 21, 1999

Mrs. FEINSTEIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

For the relief of Sergio Lozano, Fauricio Lozano and Ana

Lozano.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR SERGIO

4 LOZANO, FAURICIO LOZANO AND ANA

5 LOZANO.

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a)

7 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality

8 Act, Sergio Lozano, Fauricio Lozano and Ana Lozano

9 shall be eligible for issuance of an immigrant visa or for

10 adjustment of status to that of an alien lawfully admitted

11 for permanent residence upon filing an application for
2

S 276 IS

1 issuance of an immigrant visa under section 204 of such

2 Act or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resi3 dent.

4 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Sergio Lozano,

5 Fauricio Lozano and Ana Lozano enter the United States

6 before the filing deadline specified in subsection (c), they

7 shall be considered to have entered and remained lawfully

8 and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligible for adjustment

9 of status under section 245 of the Immigration and Na10 tionality Act as of the date of the enactment of this Act.

11 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

12 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap13 plications for issuance of immigrant visas or the applica14 tions for adjustment of status are filed with appropriate

15 fees within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this

16 Act.

17 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.—

18 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res19 idence to Sergio Lozano, Fauricio Lozano and Ana

20 Lozano, the Secretary of State shall instruct the proper

21 officer to reduce by three, during the current or next fol22 lowing fiscal year, the total number of immigrant visas

23 that are made available to natives of the country of the

24 aliens’ birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration and

25 Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of immi-
3

S 276 IS

1 grant visas that are made available to natives of the coun2 try of the aliens’ birth under section 202(e) of such Act.

Æ
#### LAMB v. STATE.

No. 16451.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 24, 1934.

■Crumpton & Crumpton, of Texarkana, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

- HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, the punishment.being assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty. No statement of facts on the plea is brought for-' ward. Appellant predicates his motion for new trial upon the claim- that- the court committed, error in not -advising appellant of his right to apply for a suspended sentence *618and for failing to appoint an attorney to represent him for that purpose, as provided in article 776, C. C. P., 1925. Evidence was heard upon the motion and is brought forward as an agreed statement of facts, which is incorporated in a hill of exception. The motion for new trial was overruled on the 12th day of July, 1933, and notice of appeal given at that time. The court gave appellant ninety days from said date in which to ■file bills of exception and statement of facts. The ninety days expired on October 10, 1933. The bill of exception was not filed until October 12th, which was two days too late. Upon October 8th the court undertook to grant ten days’ additional time to that already given. By express limitation of article 760, C. C. P., the court had no authority to extend the time beyond ninety days after notice of appeal had been given. Ross v. State, 112 Tex. Cr. R. 14, 13 S.W.(2d) 701; Hair v. State, 112 Tex. Cr. R. 37, 13 S.W.(2d) 846; Tillar v. State, 111 Tex. Cr. R. 410, 13 S.W.(2d) 368; Simmons v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R. 68, 28 S.W.(2d) 1084. Many other authorities will be found in note 50 under article 760, C. C. P., in the Cumulative Pocket Part (1933) of Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P., vol. 3.

The judgment is affirmed.
ACH Credit Instructions

Attachment 3

Office of Personnel Management

NACHA 

Record 

Type 

Code

NACHA 

Field

NACHA

Data Element Name Required Information 

5 3 Company/Agency Name (Enter the name of the payor/remitter. If 

you are a federal agency with a Payroll 

Office Number, also enter your PON 

number.)

5 6 Standard Entry Class Code CCD (or CTX)

5 9 Effective Entry Date (Enter intended settlement date.)

6 2 Transaction Code* 22

6 3 & 4 Receiving DFI Identification (ABA routing #) 051036706

6 5 DFI Account Number (Enter 12 digit agency account number. 

OPM 2 Credit Gateway/DFI Account 

Number is: 824000002001 )

6 6 Amount (Enter payment amount.)

6 8 Receiving Company/Agency Name (Enter identification information – up to 22 

characters. Please enter “OPM2” (please 

make sure to enter “OPM2” and not just 

“OPM”, as there are several ALCs 

associated with OPM), AND a brief 

description of the transaction, e.g.; 

“Oct.FY12-2812”, “Premium Ref.”, “RITS 

Sept.10-30”.) 

 

* ACH debits are not permitted to this ABA routing number. All debits received will be automatically returned.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

SHAUN ANDRIKOPOULOS §

and MICHAEL A. SANTER, § No. 490 , 2015

§

Plaintiffs Below

- Appellants, § Court Below: Court of Chancery

§ of the State of Delaware

v. §

§ C.A. No. 9899

- VCP

SILICON VALLEY INNOVATION §

COMPANY, LLC

, §

§

Defendant Below

- Appellee. §

Submitted: June 8 , 2016

Decided: June 8 , 2016

Before STRINE , Chief Justice; HOLLAND

, VALIHURA

, VAUGHN , and

SEITZ

, Justices , constituting the Court en B anc

.

O R D E R

This 8 th day of June 2016 , upon consideration of the parties’ briefs and the

record below, we find it evident that the judgment of the Court of Chancery should

be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned in the well

- reasoned

decision dated July 30 , 2015

. 1

NOW , THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the Court of Chancery ’s

judgment is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Leo E. Strine, Jr.

Chief Justice

1 Andrikopoulos v. Silicon Valley Innovation Co., LLC

, 120 A.3d 19 (Del. Ch. 2015).
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Golden Build Construction Co. ) ) Under Contract No. W91B4M-10-C-7134 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 60928

Mr. Mahmood Nezam

ChiefExecutive Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney LTC Joseph J. Jankunis, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 22 June 2017

dministrative Judge Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60928, Appeal ofGolden Build Construction Co., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-15-0000481 12-OCT-2015 10:46 AM
EXHIBIT 13.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of
Macau Resources Group Limited (the “Registrant”) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), we, Cheok Va Lam and James
Preissler, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, respectively certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that, to the best of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Registrant.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, this certification is being furnished and not deemed filed.



|Dated: February 23, 2015        | 
|------------------------------- | 
|                                | 
|/s/ Cheok Va Lam                | 
|Name:  Cheok Va Lam             | 
|Title:  Chief Executive Officer | 
|                                | 
|/s/ James Preissler             | 
|Name:  James Preissler          | 
|Title:  Chief Financial Officer |
# STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT JOHNNY POURCIAU VERSUS EARL DEMPSEY PENDARVIS NO. 2022 CW 0422 

### JULY 5, 2022 In Re: 

### Johnny Pourciau, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 23rd Judicial District Court, Parish of Ascension, No. 132732. BEFORE: McCLENDON, WELCH, AND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. Pmc JEW CHH

COURT OF APPEAL, 

### FIRST CIRCUIT
DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
#### SMITH v. STATE.

No. 17638.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 6, 1935.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of a horse is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The state’s attorney before this court objects to the consideration of the statement of facts and bills of exception for the reason that they were not filed within the time prescribed by law. The motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given on December 20, 1934. The ninety days from this date allowed for the filing of the bills of exception and statement of facts expired on March 20, 1935. The bills of exception and statement of facts were not filed until March 26, 1935, which was six days beyond the time allowed by law, and therefore cannot be considered by this court. See article 760, subd. 5, C. C. P. 1925; also Tex. Jur., vol. 4, p. 430, § 295.

No error having been perceived or pointed out in the record, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

# AGENCY:

Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This meeting will be held via teleconference.

# DATES:

The meeting will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jose Cintron-Santiago at 1-888-912-1227 or 787-522-8607.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) that a meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Taxpayer Communications Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be made with Jose Cintron-Santiago. For more information, please contact Jose Cintron-Santiago at 1-888-912-1227 or 787-522-8607, or write TAP Office, 48 Carr 165 Suite 2000, Guaynabo, PR 00968-8000 or contact us at the website:                     *http://www.improveirs.org.*                     The agenda will include TAP 2024 committee project focus areas.                

Dated: October 1, 2024.

Shawn Collins,

Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.

[FR Doc. 2024-23311 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3529 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3529

  To require the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
   Administration to study the feasibility of constructing an aramid 
synthetic fiber aqueduct to transport water from Oregon to California, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2015

 Mrs. Mimi Walters of California introduced the following bill; which 
    was referred to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
   Administration to study the feasibility of constructing an aramid 
synthetic fiber aqueduct to transport water from Oregon to California, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STUDY.

    The Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration shall conduct a study of the feasibility of constructing 
an aqueduct using aramid synthetic fiber for the purpose of 
transporting water from Oregon to California.

SEC. 2. REPORT TO CONGRESS.

    Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
Administrator shall submit to Congress a report describing the results 
of the study required under section 1.
                                 <all>
```
KBS SOR II S-11/A Amend no.4 Exhibit 10.4




Exhibit 10.4
AMENDMENT NO. 2
TO THE
ADVISORY AGREEMENT
     This amendment no. 2 to the Advisory Agreement dated as of July 3, 2013 (the “Advisory Agreement”), between KBS Strategic Opportunity REIT II, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), and KBS Capital Advisors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”), is entered as of June 26, 2014 (the “Amendment”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined shall have the meanings set forth in the Advisory Agreement.
WHEREAS, upon the terms set forth in this Amendment, the Advisor has agreed to amend certain terms related to the duration of the Advisory Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements and covenants contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Company and the Advisor agree to amend the Advisory Agreement as follows:
		
	1.
	Term.  Section 13.01of the Advisory Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


13.01 Term.  This Agreement shall commence upon the date hereof and shall terminate upon the commencement of a Public Offering.
2.Ratification; Effect on Advisory Agreement.
		
	a.
	Ratification. The Advisory Agreement, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect and is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects.




		
	b.
	Effect on the Advisory Agreement. On and after the date hereof, each reference in the Advisory Agreement to “this Agreement,” “herein,” “hereof,” “hereunder,” or words of similar import shall mean and be a reference to the Advisory Agreement as amended hereby.




Signature page follows.









IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date and year first above written.




KBS STRATEGIC OPPORTUNITY REIT II, INC.


		
	By:
	/s/ Keith D. Hall


Keith D. Hall, Chief Executive Officer




KBS CAPITAL ADVISORS LLC


		
	By: 
	GKP Holding LLC, a Manager




		
	By:
	/s/ Peter McMillan III


Peter McMillan III, Manager


		
	By:
	/s/ Keith D. Hall


Keith D. Hall, Manager


		
	By: 
	Schreiber Real Estate Investments, L.P., a Manager




		
	By:
	Schreiber Investments, LLC, as general partner




		
	By:
	/s/ Peter McMillan III


Peter McMillan III, Manager
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT of 1934
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Renegy Holdings, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with
respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods
presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
    5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants
auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
    By:
    /s/ Robert W. ZackName:
    Robert W. ZackTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ROBERT J. MARSHALL, JR.,

Appellant

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 5 MAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 863 FR
2015 dated December 13, 2018 overruling the exceptions and entered judgment against taxpayer of the November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed

the PA Board of Finance and

Revenue at No. 0811195 date d December 3, 2015.

JOHN K. HOUSSELS, JR.,

Appellant

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 6 MAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 867 FR
2015 dated December 13, 2018 which overruled the exceptions and entered judgment against taxpayer of the November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed

the PA Board of Finance and

Revenue at No. 0712902 dated December 3, 2015.

CRAIG S. AND CHRISTINE L. ANDREWS,

Appellants

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 7 MAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 185 FR
2016 dated December 13, 2018 which overruled the exceptions and entered judgment against taxpayer of the November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed

the PA Board of Finance and

Revenue at No. 0811417 dated March
1, 2016.

RONALD S. LEVENTHAL,

Appellant :

:

:

:

: No. 8 MAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 186 FR
2016 dated December 13, 2018 whichv.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

: overruled the exceptions and entered judgment against taxpayer of the November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed

the PA Board of Finance and

Revenue at No. 0811439 dated March

1 , 2016

ANNETTE SHARPE,

Appellant

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 9 MAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 187 FR
2016 dated December 13, 2018 which

overruled the exceptions and entered judgment against taxpayer of the November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed

the PA Board of Finance and

Revenue at No. 0813370 dated March 1, 2016

JOHN THOMPSON,

Appellant

v.

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Appellee :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 10 MAP 2019

Appeal from the Order of the

Commonwealth Court at No. 188 FR
2016 dated December 13, 2018 which overruled the exceptions and entered judgment against taxpayer of the November 2, 2018 order that Affirmed

the PA Board o f Finance and

Revenue at No. 0812883 dated March 1, 2016

O RDER

PER CURIAM DECIDED: August 20, 2019

AND NOW, this 20 th day of August , 2019

, the Order of the Commonwealth Court

is AFFIRMED

. The Application for Oral Argument is DENIED

.
**EXHIBIT 13.1**

 

**Certification**

 

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

 

Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Amira Nature Foods Ltd (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

  

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2019 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

|            | **AMIRA NATURE FOODS LTD** |                                         |
|-----------------|----------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|            |                       |                                         |   |
| August 18, 2020 | By:                        | */s/ Karan A. Chanana*                       |   |
|            |                       | Name: Karan A. Chanana                       |   |
|            |                       | Title: Chairman                              |   |
|            |                  |                                         |   |
| August 18, 2020 | By:                        | */s/ Brian Speck*                            |   |
|            |                       | Name: Brian Speck                            |   |
|            |                       | Title: Chief Financial Officer               |   |
|            |                       | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |