alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### James Charles SPRINGER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20665.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

Williamson & Allen, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for forgery. The punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The appellant has filed an affidavit *to*dismiss this appeal, duly verified as required by law. The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Barrist, Chief Executive Officer of NCO Group, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) intentionally omitted;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: August 14, 2007



/s/ Michael J. BarristMichael J. BarristChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
# Rule-Making Cover Sheet

TO : Secretary of State -2 6 ' 1 r f J " ATTN: Administrative Procedure Officer

State House Station 101, Augusta, Maine 04333 1 . Agency : Department of Environmental Protection 2. Agency umbrella and unit number : 06-096 3. Title of rule : Surface Coatings Facilities i ~^~CF~ETARY aF S7ATE 4. Chapter number assigned to the rule : 129 5. Date(s)/method(s) of notice : On October 13, 2010 in the Kennebce Journal, Portland Press Herald, Bangor Daily News, Lewiston Sun Journal and Waterville Morning Sentinel . 6 . Date(s)/place(s) of hearing(s) : No hearing scheduled : 30-day comment period 7. Type: - new

rule _X partial amendment(s) of existing rule suspension of existing rule -repeal of rule _emergency rule -repeal and replace: complete replacement of existing chapter, with former version simultaneously repealed . 8. Name/phone of agency contact person : Carolyn Wheeler (207) 287-2437 9 . If a major substantive rule under Title 5, c. 375, sub-CII-A, check one of the following: 0 Provisional adoption 0 Final adoption

(prior to Legislative review) - Emergency adoption of major-substantive rule 10 . Certification Statement: I, Darryl Brown, hereby certify that the attached is a true copy of the rule described above and lawfully adopted by the Board of Environmental Protectioji,on January 6, 2011 . Signature: (original signature, pers6nally 'signed by the head of agency) Printed name &title: Darryl Brown, Commissioner 11 . Approved as to formand legality by the Attorney General on Signature: (original signature, pePsonally signed by theTiead of agency) Printed name &title: ~w WA D- 1~, R 

### EFFECTIVE DATE: APR 1 6 2011 

# #/~Ikl (date) 

# D C~C~CC

f IC AI11 

### i 2011 OFFICE 07THESErRETARYG'STATE !

' ^ '4T~ MAINE '
#### SANCHEZ v. AMERICAN NAT. INS. CO.

No. 8628.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 3, 1931.

Rehearing Denied July 8, 1931.

Harry B. Berry, of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

Carter & Carter, of San Antonio, for defendant in error.

FLY, C. J.

Plaintiff in error, herein styled plaintiff, sued defendant in error, styled" defendant, to recover on an insurance policy to recover insurance, penalty, and attorney’s fees. The court, after hearing the evidence, instructed a verdict for defendant.

The facts show that the life of Julian Sanchez-was, on April 18, 1929, insured fffr $1,-000. The policy provided for payment of premiums quarterly; the first being payable in advance. That payment was made. The second payment was due on July 18, 1929, but the insured, under the law and terms of the policy, had until August 18 in which to pay the premium. Two minor children of Julian Sanchez, who died on August 26, 1929, swore that an agent of the defendant stated that he would get the company to grant another week in which to pay the premium. It was not paid. The following provision is included in the policy: “All premiums under this Policy are payable in advance either at the Home Office or to any agent upon delivery of a receipt signed by the President, Vice-President, Secretary or Actuary -of the Company. No officer other than those stated and no Agent has the power to make or to modify this or any other contract of the Company in any respect whatever, and the Company is not responsible for, and shall not be bound by, any promises or representations made by any other than the officers named, and then not unless said promises or representations are in writing and signed by one of the officers stated.”

The policy, as indicated, prohibits any change in the terms of the policy by any agent of the company, and the statutes of the state as emphatically deny any such authority. Article 5063, Revised Statutes. It is provided in that statute that no “agent shall have the power to waive, change or alter any of the terms or conditions of the application or policy.” The agent is positively forbidden to make any such agreement as the two minors swore he made.

The court properly instructed a verdict for defendant. The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 August 15, 2007
 WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
  Republic of Panama
 1-11953
(Commission File Number)
    
    98-0160660
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 Plaza 2000 Building, 50th Street, 8th Floor, P.O. Box 0816-01098, Panama, Republic of Panama
 +507-213-0947
 Not Applicable
  see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
      2




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  WILLBROS GROUP, INC.Date:  August 21, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Van A. WelchVan A. WelchSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 3
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Anthony Sfarra, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports onForm 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-LC5 (the"Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, takenas a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing andother information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statementsrequired in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilledtheir obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicingcriteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports onassessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesrequired to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 ofRegulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as anexhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Anymaterial instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. BankNational Association, as Trustee, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, LLC (f/k/aTriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.), as Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Solutions,LLC., as Servicing Function Participant, Computershare Trust Company, NationalAssociation, as Servicing Function Participant for the CertificateAdministrator on and after November 1, 2021, Computershare Trust Company,National Association, as Servicing Function Participant for the Custodian onand after November 1, 2021, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as SpecialServicer for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust CompanyAmericas, as Trustee for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan, PentalphaSurveillance LLC, as Trust Advisor for the 100 Church Street Mortgage Loan,CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant for the 100 ChurchStreet Mortgage Loan, and Computershare Trust Company, National Association, asServicing Function Participant for the Custodian for the 100 Church StreetMortgage Loan on and after November 1, 2021.

 

 

 

Dated: March 14, 2022 

 

/s/ Anthony Sfarra

Anthony Sfarra

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Corporate Trust ServicesMAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road

Columbia, MD 21045

 

Tel:  410 884 2000

Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.

c/oWells Fargo Securities,  LLC

375 Park Avenue 2nd floor

J0127-023

New York, New York 10152-023

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage

Securities Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-LC5

 

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"),  the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending  December 31, 2014 (the "Reporting  Period"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

February 26, 2015

 

/s/  Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH 

Vice President

 

 

 
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  |
|------------------------|--|
737-600/-700/-800/-900

AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL

Code 4001

FAA APPROVED 03-14-13 D631A001 Section 1 Page 14A 

M I S C E L L A N E O U S L I M I T A T I O N S

(The following CABIN ALTITUDE WARNING TAKEOFF BRIEFING section is

not applicable if CABIN ALTITUDE and TAKEOFF CONFIG lights are

installed and activated as mandated by AD 2013-02-05.)

CABIN ALTITUDE WARNING TAKEOFF BRIEFING (required by AD 2008-23-07)

With the CABIN ALTITUDE and TAKEOFF CONFIG lights not installed, or

installed but not activated:

As part of the Takeoff Briefing before engine start for the first

flight of the day or following any change of either flight crew

member, the pilot-in-command will ensure the Cabin Altitude Warning

indications and procedures are briefed in accordance with the

procedures contained in the Normal Procedures Section of this

manual.

COLD SOAKED FUEL FROST

The certified performance data in this AFM is not affected if cold

soaked fuel frost does not exceed the limits specified below. This

finding does not constitute operational approval to conduct takeoffs

with cold soaked fuel frost on the wings and will require the

operator to obtain an exemption from the FAA or may require an

equivalent exemption from a foreign regulatory authority.

Takeoff is not permitted if:

1. The cold soaked fuel frost exceeds 1/8 inch (3 mm) in

thickness on the lower wing tank surfaces.

2. There is cold soaked fuel frost on the upper wing tank

surfaces:

(a) That exceeds 1/16 inch (1.5 mm) or

(b) That is not of similar extent on both wings or

(c) That is beyond the outer edge of the black lines

defining the cold soaked fuel frost area

(in accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin

737-11-1125, or the production equivalent).

3. There is cold soaked fuel frost on the upper wing tank

surfaces:

(a) And the ambient air temperature is below freezing

(0o C, 32o F)or

(b) There is precipitation or visible moisture (rain, snow,

drizzle, or fog with less than 1 mile visibility).
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C8,
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
  Series 2012-C8 (the Trust)

  I, Anthony Sfarra, a President of Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
  Securities, Inc., the depositor into the above-referenced Trust, certify
  that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A, and all reports Form
    10-D required to be filed in respect of periods included in the year
    covered by this annual report, of the Trust;

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic report, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement
    in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K/A.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. as Vendor for Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust
    Company Americas as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as
    Trustee for the Northridge Fashion Center Loan and the Town Center of
    Cobb Loan, National Tax Search, LLC as Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
     as Master Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor,
    Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Torchlight Loan
    Services, LLC as Special Servicer for the Northridge Fashion Center
    Loan and the Town Center of Cobb Loan and TriMont Real Estate Advisors,
    Inc. as Trust Advisor for the Northridge Fashion Center Loan and the
    Town Center of Cobb Loan.

    Dated:   March 31, 2014


    /s/ Anthony Sfarra
    Signature

    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3601 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 494
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3601

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             March 2, 2016

     Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                              May 25, 2016

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7715 Post Road, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, as the ``Melvoid J. 
                     Benson Post Office Building''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. MELVOID J. BENSON POST OFFICE BUILDING.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 7715 Post Road, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, shall be 
known and designated as the ``Melvoid J. Benson Post Office Building''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Melvoid J. 
Benson Post Office Building''.
                                                       Calendar No. 494

114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3601

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 7715 Post Road, North Kingstown, Rhode Island, as the ``Melvoid J. 
                     Benson Post Office Building''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                              May 25, 2016

                       Reported without amendment
```
#### Milton Schwartz et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Richard L. Rosenthal et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 7, 1958.

*Marshall, Bratter, Green, Allison & Tucker*for plaintiffs.

*Cleary, Gottlieb, Friendly <& Hamilton*for Bichard L. Bosenthal, and others, defendants.

*648Aeon Stetjeb, J.

The complaint in this stockholders’ representative action contains two causes of action. It alleges that the corporate defendant is in the business of supplying water to various communities in the State. Many of its properties have been condemned and as a result its business has been diminished materially and is steadily shrinking. The salary of its president has on the contrary steadily increased. In April, 1956 the corporation entered into a contract to continue his employment until 1965 at a salary comparable to his present one to be fixed by the directors. In addition the agreement provides for the delivery of a sum of $372,256 by the corporation to escrowees. This fund is to be invested and 10% of its income paid to the corporation for expenses and taxes and the balance accumulated. At the expiration of the employment period in 1965 or earlier in the event of disability the fund is to be paid to the president in annual installments to be fixed. In the event of discharge for cause no payments are to be made. In the first cause of action this agreement is attacked as a gift or payment for services already paid for. In the second cause of action it is attacked as a waste of corporate assets.

The first cause of action adds nothing to the second. As the agreement is before the court and its text is not disputed allegations contrary to its terms may be regarded as sham. So that it appears that the agreement is not without consideration. The payments provided are deferred payments for services to be rendered. They may be excessive but there is nothing in the agreement or the pleading to show that they constitute a bonus or gift except the pleader’s conclusion.

The second cause of action alleges that the president dominated and controlled the directors. There is no attempt to state just how he did this. Failing such a statement the pleading must be regarded as conclusory. However, these allegations are not necessary to the pleadings. Directors may make improvident agreements or waste corporate assets even though not dominated by the beneficiaries of that action. The allegations are in a certain light conclusory but this is practically impossible to avoid. Taken in its best construction, as the complaint must be on this application, the complaint alleges that the services that can be rendered will be markedly less than what they have been for years; that the compensation for the period will be substantially higher. Whether, comparing the figures, the disparity is gross cannot be answered categorically. Under the circumstances a cause of action for waste is stated.

Motion granted as to first cause of action. Denied as to second.