Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 168 / Friday, August 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules 51515 

5 In particular, the written request for confidential 

treatment that accompanies the comment must 

include the factual and legal basis for the request, 

and must identify the specific portions of the 

comment to be withheld from the public record. See 

FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c). 

1. Is this method, both with respect to 

the process for obtaining consent for an 

initial operator and any subsequent 

operators, already covered by existing 

methods enumerated in § 312.5(b)(1) of 

the Rule? 

2. If this is a new method, provide 

comments on whether the proposed 

parental consent method, both with 

respect to an initial operator and any 

subsequent operators, meets the 

requirements for parental consent laid 

out in 16 CFR 312.5(b)(1). Specifically, 

the Commission is looking for 

comments on whether the proposed 

parental consent method is reasonably 

calculated, in light of available 

technology, to ensure that the person 

providing consent is the child’s parent. 

3. Does this proposed method pose a 

risk to consumers’ personal 

information? If so, is that risk 

outweighed by the benefit to consumers 

and businesses of using this method? 

Section C. Invitation To Comment 

You can file a comment online or on 

paper. For the Commission to consider 

your comment, we must receive it on or 

before September 30, 2014. Write 

‘‘AgeCheq Application for Parental 

Consent Method, Project No. 

P–145410’’ on your comment. Your 

comment—including your name and 

your state—will be placed on the public 

record of this proceeding, including, to 

the extent practicable, on the 

Commission Web site, at http://

www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm. 

As a matter of discretion, the 

Commission tries to remove individuals’ 

home contact information from 

comments before placing them on the 

Commission Web site. 

Because your comment will be made 

public, you are solely responsible for 

making sure that your comment doesn’t 

include any sensitive personal 

information, such as Social Security 

number, date of birth, driver’s license 

number or other state identification 

number or foreign country equivalent, 

passport number, financial account 

number, or credit or debit card number. 

You are also solely responsible for 

making sure that your comment does 

not include any sensitive health 

information, including medical records 

or other individually identifiable health 

information. In addition, do not include 

any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or 

financial information which is . . . 

privileged or confidential,’’ as provided 

in Section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 

46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 

4.10(a)(2). In particular, do not include 

competitively sensitive information 

such as costs, sales statistics, 

inventories, formulas, patterns, devices, 

manufacturing processes, or customer 

names. 

If you want the Commission to give 

your comment confidential treatment, 

you must file it in paper form, with a 

request for confidential treatment, and 

follow the procedure explained in FTC 

Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).5 Your 

comment will be kept confidential only 

if the FTC General Counsel, in his or her 

sole discretion, grants your request in 

accordance with the law and the public 

interest. 

Postal mail addressed to the 

Commission is subject to delay due to 

heightened security screening. As a 

result, we encourage you to submit your 

comments online. To make sure that the 

Commission considers your online 

comment, you must file it at https://

ftcpublic.commentworks.com/ftc/

coppaagecheqapp, by following the 

instructions on the web-based form. If 

this Notice appears at http://

www.regulations.gov/#!home, you also 

may file a comment through that Web 

site. 

If you file your comment on paper, 

write ‘‘AgeCheq Application for 

Parental Consent Method, Project No. 

P–145410’’ on your comment and on the 

envelope, and mail it to the following 

address: Federal Trade Commission, 

Office of the Secretary, 600 

Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Suite CC– 

5610 (Annex K), Washington, DC 20580, 

or deliver your comment to the 

following address: Federal Trade 

Commission, Office of the Secretary, 

Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW., 

5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex K), 

Washington, DC 20024. If possible, 

submit your paper comment to the 

Commission by courier or overnight 

service. 

Visit the Commission Web site at 

http://www.ftc.gov to read this Notice 

and the news release describing it. The 

FTC Act and other laws that the 

Commission administers permit the 

collection of public comments to 

consider and use in this proceeding as 

appropriate. The Commission will 

consider all timely and responsive 

public comments that it receives on or 

before September 30, 2014. You can find 

more information, including routine 

uses permitted by the Privacy Act, in 

the Commission’s privacy policy, at 

http://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.htm. 

By direction of the Commission. 

Janice Podoll Frankle, 

Acting Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2014–20645 Filed 8–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6750–01–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0475; FRL–9915–83– 

Region 3] 

Approval and Promulgation of Air 

Quality Implementation Plans; 

Pennsylvania; Allegheny County’s 

Adoption of Control Techniques 

Guidelines for Four Industry 

Categories for Control of Volatile 

Organic Compound Emissions 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA) is proposing to 

conditionally approve revisions to the 

Pennsylvania State Implementation Plan 

(SIP) submitted by the Commonwealth 

of Pennsylvania on behalf of the 

Allegheny County Health Department 

(ACHD). This SIP revision includes 

amendments to the ACHD Rules and 

Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution 

Control, and meets the requirement to 

adopt Reasonably Available Control 

Technology (RACT) for sources covered 

by EPA’s Control Techniques 

Guidelines (CTG) standards for the 

following categories: miscellaneous 

metal and/or plastic parts surface 

coating processes, automobile and lightduty truck assembly coatings, 

miscellaneous industrial adhesives, and 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. 

Upon review of the submittal, EPA 

found that the average monomer volatile 

organic compound (VOC) content limits 

were referenced but not included in the 

regulation for fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials. ACHD has 

committed to revising the regulation 

and submitting the table of VOC content 

limits for fiberglass boat manufacturing 

materials to EPA in order to address 

specific RACT requirements for 

Allegheny County. EPA is, therefore, 

proposing conditional approval of the 

revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP in 

accordance with the requirements of the 

Clean Air Act (CAA). 

DATES: Written comments must be 

received on or before September 29, 

2014. 

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, 

identified by Docket ID Number EPA– 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
51516 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 168 / Friday, August 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

R03–OAR–2014–0475 by one of the 

following methods: 

A. www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

on-line instructions for submitting 

comments. 

B. Email: fernandez.cristina@epa.gov 

C. Mail: EPA–R03–OAR–2014–0475, 

Cristina Fernandez, Associate Director, 

Office of Air Program Planning, 

Mailcode 3AP30, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 

Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 

19103. 

D. Hand Delivery: At the previouslylisted EPA Region III address. Such 

deliveries are only accepted during the 

Docket’s normal hours of operation, and 

special arrangements should be made 

for deliveries of boxed information. 

Instructions: Direct your comments to 

Docket ID No. EPA–R03–OAR–2014– 

0475. EPA’s policy is that all comments 

received will be included in the public 

docket without change, and may be 

made available online at 

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information provided, unless 

the comment includes information 

claimed to be Confidential Business 

Information (CBI) or other information 

whose disclosure is restricted by statute. 

Do not submit information that you 

consider to be CBI or otherwise 

protected through www.regulations.gov 

or email. The www.regulations.gov Web 

site is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, 

which means EPA will not know your 

identity or contact information unless 

you provide it in the body of your 

comment. If you send an email 

comment directly to EPA without going 

through www.regulations.gov, your 

email address will be automatically 

captured and included as part of the 

comment that is placed in the public 

docket and made available on the 

Internet. If you submit an electronic 

comment, EPA recommends that you 

include your name and other contact 

information in the body of your 

comment and with any disk or CD–ROM 

you submit. If EPA cannot read your 

comment due to technical difficulties 

and cannot contact you for clarification, 

EPA may not be able to consider your 

comment. Electronic files should avoid 

the use of special characters, any form 

of encryption, and be free of any defects 

or viruses. 

Docket: All documents in the 

electronic docket are listed in the 

www.regulations.gov index. Although 

listed in the index, some information is 

not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other 

information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically in www.regulations.gov or 

in hard copy during normal business 

hours at the Air Protection Division, 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 

Region III, 1650 Arch Street, 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. 

Copies of the State submittal are 

available at the Allegheny County 

Health Department, Bureau of 

Environmental Quality, Division of Air 

Quality, 301 39th Street, Pittsburgh, 

Pennsylvania 15201 and at the 

Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air 

Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 

Market Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 

17105. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Irene Shandruk, (215) 814–2166, or by 

email at shandruk.irene@epa.gov 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background 

Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides 

that SIPs for nonattainment areas must 

include reasonably available control 

measures (RACM), including RACT, for 

sources of emissions. Section 

182(b)(2)(A) provides that for certain 

nonattainment areas, states must revise 

their SIP to include RACT for sources of 

VOC emissions covered by a CTG 

document issued after November 15, 

1990 and prior to the area’s date of 

attainment. EPA defines RACT as ‘‘the 

lowest emission limitation that a 

particular source is capable of meeting 

by the application of control technology 

that is reasonably available considering 

technological and economic feasibility.’’ 

44 FR 53761 (September 17, 1979). 

CTGs are documents issued by EPA 

intended to provide state and local air 

pollution control authorities 

information to assist them in 

determining RACT for VOC from 

various sources. Section 183(e)(3)(c) 

provides that EPA may issue a CTG in 

lieu of a national regulation as RACT for 

a product category where EPA 

determines that the CTG will be 

substantially as effective as regulations 

in reducing emissions of VOC in ozone 

nonattainment areas. The 

recommendations in the CTG are based 

upon available data and information 

and may not apply to a particular 

situation based upon the circumstances. 

States can follow the CTG and adopt 

state regulations to implement the 

recommendations contained therein, or 

they can adopt alternative approaches. 

In either case, states must submit their 

RACT rules to EPA for review and 

approval as part of the SIP process. 

In 1977 and 1978, EPA published 

CTGs for miscellaneous metal and 

plastic parts surface coatings, 

automobile and light-duty truck 

assembly coatings, miscellaneous 

industrial adhesives, and fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials. After 

reviewing the 1977/1978 CTGs for these 

industries, conducting a review of 

currently existing state and local VOC 

emission reduction approaches for these 

industries, and taking into account any 

information that has become available 

since then, EPA developed new CTGs 

entitled Control Techniques Guidelines 

for Miscellaneous Metal and Plastic 

Parts Coatings (Publication No. EPA 

453/R–08–003; September 2008); 

Control Techniques Guidelines for 

Automobile and Light-duty Assembly 

Coatings (Publication No. EPA 453/R– 

08–006; September 2008); Control 

Techniques Guidelines for 

Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives 

(Publication No. EPA 453/R–08–005; 

September 2008); Control Techniques 

Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat 

Manufacturing Materials (Publication 

No. EPA 453/R–08–004; September 

2008). 

III. Summary of SIP Revision 

On November 15, 2013, Pennsylvania 

Department of Environmental Protection 

(PADEP) submitted to EPA on behalf of 

ACHD a SIP revision concerning the 

adoption of the EPA CTGs for 

miscellaneous metal and/or plastic parts 

surface coating processes, automobile 

and light-duty truck assembly coatings, 

miscellaneous industrial adhesives, and 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials 

in Allegheny County. Allegheny County 

is adopting EPA’s CTG standards for 

miscellaneous metal and/or plastic parts 

surface coating processes, automobile 

and light-duty truck assembly coatings, 

miscellaneous industrial adhesives, and 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. 

These regulations are contained in the 

Allegheny County Health Department 

(ACHD) Rules and Regulations, Article 

XXI, Air Pollution Control sections 

2105.83, 2105.84, 2105.85, and 2105.86 

in order to: (1) Establish applicability 

for miscellaneous metal and/or plastic 

parts surface coating processes, 

automobile and light-duty truck 

assembly coatings, miscellaneous 

industrial adhesives, and fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials; (2) establish 

exemptions; (3) establish record-keeping 

and work practice requirements; and (4) 

establish emission limitations. Upon 

review of the November 15, 2013 

submittal, EPA found that a table of 

average monomer VOC content limit for 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials 

was referenced, however, the table was 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 168 / Friday, August 29, 2014 / Proposed Rules 51517 

erroneously not included in the 

regulation. Pursuant to section 110(k)(4) 

of the CAA, PADEP submitted on behalf 

of ACHD a letter dated July 16, 2014 

committing to submit a SIP revision to 

EPA addressing this error in order to 

satisfy the RACT requirements under 

the 8-hour ozone standard for Allegheny 

County. More detailed information on 

these provisions can be found in the 

technical support document located in 

the docket prepared for this rulemaking 

action. 

IV. Proposed Action 

EPA is proposing conditional 

approval of the Commonwealth of 

Pennsylvania SIP revision submitted on 

November 15, 2013, which consists of 

amendments to the ACHD Rules and 

Regulations, Article XXI, Air Pollution 

Control for adopting RACT for sources 

covered by EPA’s CTG standards for the 

following categories: Miscellaneous 

metal and/or plastic parts surface 

coating processes, automobile and lightduty truck assembly coatings, 

miscellaneous industrial adhesives, and 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. 

Pursuant to section 110(k)(4) of the 

CAA, this conditional approval is based 

upon a letter from PADEP on behalf of 

ACHD dated July 16, 2014 committing 

to submit to EPA, no later than twelve 

months from EPA’s final conditional 

approval of ACHD’s adoption of CTGs 

for miscellaneous metal and/or plastic 

parts surface coating processes, 

automobile and light-duty truck 

assembly coatings, miscellaneous 

industrial adhesives, and fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials, an additional 

SIP revision to address the erroneous 

deficiency in the current regulation for 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. 

The SIP revision, to be submitted by 

PADEP on behalf of ACHD, will include 

a table of monomer VOC content limits 

for fiberglass boat manufacturing 

materials. Once EPA has determined 

that ACHD has satisfied this condition, 

EPA shall remove the conditional nature 

of its approval and Allegheny County’s 

adoption of CTGs for miscellaneous 

metal and/or plastic parts surface 

coating processes, automobile and lightduty truck assembly coatings, 

miscellaneous industrial adhesives, and 

fiberglass boat manufacturing materials 

will, at that time, receive a full approval 

status. Should ACHD fail to meet the 

condition specified above, the final 

conditional approval of Allegheny 

County’s CTGs for the above listed 

source categories will convert to a 

disapproval. EPA is soliciting public 

comments on the issues discussed in 

this document. These comments will be 

considered before taking final action. 

V. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

CAA and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely proposes to approve state law as 

meeting Federal requirements and does 

not impose additional requirements 

beyond those imposed by state law. For 

that reason, this proposed action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993); 

• does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• is not subject to requirements of 

Section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the CAA; and 

• does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, this proposed rule, 

pertaining to ACHD’s adoption of CTG 

standards for miscellaneous metal and/ 

or plastic parts surface coating 

processes, automobile and light-duty 

truck assembly coatings, miscellaneous 

industrial adhesives, and fiberglass boat 

manufacturing materials, does not have 

tribal implications as specified by 

Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, 

November 9, 2000), because the SIP is 

not conditionally approved to apply in 

Indian country located in the state, and 

EPA notes that it will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law. 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Ozone, Volatile organic compounds. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: August 14, 2014. 

William C. Early, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region III. 

[FR Doc. 2014–20688 Filed 8–28–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 81 

[EPA–HQ–OAR–2012–0918; FRL– 9915–91– 

OAR] 

EPA Responses to State and Tribal 

2012 Primary Annual Fine Particle 

Designation Recommendations 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency. 

ACTION: Notice of availability and public 

comment period. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) has posted its responses to state 

and tribal designation recommendations 

for the 2012 primary annual fine 

particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air 

Quality Standards (NAAQS) on the 

agency’s Internet Web site. The EPA 

invites the public to review and provide 

input on its responses during the 

comment period specified in the DATES

section. The EPA sent its responses 

directly to the states and tribes on or 

about August 19, 2014. These responses 

focus on designating as 

‘‘nonattainment’’ certain areas of the 

country where air monitoring data from 

2011–2013 indicate violations of the 

2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS. 

The EPA intends to make final 

designation determinations for the 2012 

primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS for most 

areas of the country in December 2014. 

This notice also announces the EPA’s 

decision to extend the designation 

period by up to 1 year to December 2015 

for a limited number of areas for which 

insufficient information is currently 

available to promulgate designations. 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before September 29, 2014. Please 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS