alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                    |   | Three Months Ended |    |
|---------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|---------|
|                                                    |   | March 31,               |    |
| (In thousands, except ratio)             |   | 2010                         |    |   | 2009 |   |
| Earnings      (Loss):                                   |   |                         |    |   |   |   |
| Income      (loss) from continuing operations           |   | $                            | (52,176 | ) |   | $ | 57,077 |   |
| Amortization      of capitalized interest               |   |                         | 40      |   |   |   | 34 |   |
| Capitalized      interest                               |   |                         | (37     | ) |   |   | (194 | ) |
| Fixed      charges (below)                              |   |                         | 31,561  |   |   |   | 25,442 |   |
| Earnings      (loss) adjusted for fixed charges         |   | $                            | (20,612 | ) |   | $ | 82,359 |   |
|                                                    |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Fixed      charges:                                     |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest      expense                                   |   | $                            | 31,001  |   |   | $ | 24,716 |   |
| Capitalized      interest                               |   |                         | 37      |   |   |   | 194 |   |
| Portion      of rent expense representative of interest |   |                         | 523     |   |   |   | 532 |   |
| Total      fixed charges                                |   | $                            | 31,561  |   |   | $ | 25,442 |   |
|                                                    |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio      of earnings to fixed charges                 |   |                         | -       |   |   |   | 3.24 |   |
|                                                    |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |
| Coverage      deficiency                                |   | $                            | 52,173  |   |   | $ | - |   |

----
# C_2023113EN.01002901.xml

| 28.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 113/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 113/29

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10860 – ADVENT / GfK)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 113/12)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | NielsenIQ (‘NIQ’, United States), controlled by Advent International (‘Advent’, United States), |
| --- | --- |

—

NielsenIQ (‘NIQ’, United States), controlled by Advent International (‘Advent’, United States),

| — | GfK SE (‘GfK’, Germany). |
| --- | --- |

—

GfK SE (‘GfK’, Germany).

Advent, indirectly through NIQ, will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation sole control of the whole of GfK.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | NIQ is active in the provision of market research services worldwide. NIQ is controlled by Advent, a private equity investor headquartered in the United States, |
| --- | --- |

—

NIQ is active in the provision of market research services worldwide. NIQ is controlled by Advent, a private equity investor headquartered in the United States,

| — | GfK is active in the provision of market research services worldwide. |
| --- | --- |

—

GfK is active in the provision of market research services worldwide.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10860 – ADVENT / GfK

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  
  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 12, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Allan D. Ivie, IVName:
    Allan D. Ivie, IVTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 16, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Dale E. OberkfellName:
    Dale E. OberkfellTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
# L_2013120EN.01S00301.xml

| 1.5.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 120/s3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.5.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 120/s3

---

NOTICE TO READERS

Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union

In accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 216/2013 of 7 March 2013 on the electronic publication of the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ L 69, 13.3.2013, p. 1), as of 1 July 2013, only the electronic edition of the Official Journal shall be considered authentic and shall have legal effect.

Official Journal of the European Union

Where it is not possible to publish the electronic edition of the Official Journal due to unforeseen and exceptional circumstances, the printed edition shall be authentic and shall have legal effect in accordance with the terms and conditions set out in Article 3 of Regulation (EU) No 216/2013.

---
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

MICHAEL PAUL GRINDALL,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10291

D.C. No. 4:10-cr-03090-RCC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 18, 2013** 

Before: TALLMAN, M. SMITH, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Michael Paul Grindall appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges the 46-month sentence imposed following the revocation of probation. 

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Grindall contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to

FILED

JUN 24 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10291

adequately explain the sentence or expressly state the applicable sentencing range

under U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4. We review for plain error, see United States v. ValenciaBarragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir. 2010), and find none. The district court

discussed at length its justification for the sentence and Grindall has not shown a

reasonable probability that he would have received a different sentence had the

court expressly stated the applicable sentencing range. See United States v.

Dallman, 533 F.3d 755, 762 (9th Cir. 2008).

Grindall also contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable

because the district court based the sentence on statements it made when it

originally imposed a sentence of probation. The district court did not abuse its

discretion in imposing Grindall’s sentence. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38,

51 (2007). The sentence is substantively reasonable in light of the 18 U.S.C.

§ 3553(a) sentencing factors and the totality of the circumstances. See id.

Finally, Grindall also contends that his sentence was disproportionate to the

violation and therefore violated the Eighth Amendment. This contention lacks

merit. See United States v. Parker, 241 F.3d 1114, 1117 (9th Cir. 2001)

(“Generally, as long as the sentence imposed on a defendant does not exceed

statutory limits, this court will not overturn it on Eighth Amendment grounds.”). 

AFFIRMED.
#### Clifford Hamp, Plaintiff, *v.*City of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

January 25, 1957.

*Emil Reich*for plaintiff.

*Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (George P. Hennessy*of counsel), for defendant.

Felix 0. Benvekga, J.

Plaintiff moves to strike out the third separate defense, which alleges that plaintiff has *‘*‘ failed to comply with the provisions of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law.”

The action is for personal injuries. The complaint alleges, and the moving papers show, that at the time of the assault as well as when the notice of claim was filed, the plaintiff was (and, indeed, still is) a member of the armed forces, and was in New York City on an emergency furlough to visit his mother at Harlem Hospital, where the alleged assault took place.

Section 308 of the Military Law is applicable. It provides in substance that the period of military service is not to be included in computing any period limited by law for the bringing of any action by or against any person in the military service. This provision applies not only to the bringing of an action, but also to any proceeding in any court, board, bureau, commission, department or other governmental agency or subdivision (1951 Report of Joint Legis. Comm, to Study Military Law, Legis. Doc., No. 35, pp. 153, 157). In this respect, a notice of claim is no different from a statute of limitation *(Calderon*v. *City of New York,*184 Misc. 1057, 1058-1059; *734
      *Parker*v. *State of New York,*185 Misc. 584, 588-592). Since there is no denial of the allegation that the plaintiff was and is a member of the armed forces, the inference is permissible that the defense is sham. Such a defense may be stricken on motion *(Esteves*v. *Swobodzien,*195 Misc. 956, 957-958; Carmody on New York Practice [7th ed.], § 343).

The motion is accordingly granted and the third defense is stricken.

Settle order.
[No. 19112-5-III.

Division Three.

December 19, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Dayna Christoph, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 95-8-00720-8, Ellen K. Clark, J., entered February 8, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Schultheis and Kato, JJ.
Exhibit 23.C**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We hereby consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report datedFebruary 26, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Citrus Corp. andSubsidiaries, which appears in such Registration Statement. We also consent to the reference to usunder the heading “Experts” in such Registration Statement./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPHouston, Texas
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Front Yard Residential Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2019 (“Form 10-K/A”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Date:April 29, 2020By:/s/Robin N. LoweRobin N. LoweChief Financial Officer
​

 

Exhibit 32.2​

Certification of Chief Financial OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. Todd Huskinson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

​

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

​

/s/ W. Todd Huskinson

​

Name:

W. Todd Huskinson

​

Date:

March 2, 2020

​

 

153

---
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GHULLAM REZA KHAVARI

,

Petitioner

,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

,

Respondent

. No. 17

- 70275

Agency No. A208

- 592

- 505

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted January 24 , 2020 Pasadena , California

Before: CLIFTON and LEE, Circuit Judges , and BLOCK

, * * District Judge

.

Ghullam Reza Khavari , a native and citizen of Afghanistan

, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s decision affirming the denial of his

asylum and withholding of removal application s. We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252, and we deny the petition

.

1. We review the denial of asylum for substantial evidence

. See Silva

-

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The Honorable Judge Frederic Block, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. 

# FILED

FEB 11 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

Pereira v. Lynch , 827 F.3d 1176, 1184 (9th Cir. 2016)

. We must affirm the BIA’s

decision unless “ the evidence not only supports a contrary conclusion,

but compels it .” I

d . ( quoting Huang v . Holder

, 744 F.3d 1149, 1152 ( 9th Cir. 2014) ).

2. Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s decision to affirm the

I mmigration Judge ’s adverse credibility determination . Khavari was non

- responsive

and inconsistent when testifying about his wife and her family’s attempts to receive

documentation. Khavari also gave inconsistent testimony about the threat he

received in Venezuela ( e.g ., specifically whether he was paid and whether he knew

the name of the person who threatened him). The record does not “ co mpel ” a finding

that Khavari is eligible for relief. See Silva

- Pereira , 827 F.3d at 1184

.

3. Khavari also challenges the alternate country designations of Iran,

Venezuela, and Canada for his removal. But Khavari designated Canada as an

alternate country, and he did not object before the Immigration Judge to the

Department of Homeland Security’s designations of Iran and Venezuela. Therefore,

Khavari waived his challenge to the alternative country designations.

DENIED

.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80582-80583]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22839]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4806-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Florida; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4806-DR), dated August 10, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this disaster is closed effective August 27, 2024.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to

[[Page 80583]]

Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster 
Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster 
Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and 
Households--Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance 
(Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation 
Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-22839 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
AeroUAVs LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202 July 31
, 2 0 1 5

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 12153, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1641 under Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations.

Dear Sir or Madam:

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, AeroUAVs, LLC (AeroUAVs), seeks to amend exemption No. 12153, Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 1641; Submitted by AeroUAVs for review April 20, 2015 and subsequently granted by the FAA on July 27, 2015.
The original exemption made a request to allow operations of 12 different Airframe models for:

 Aerial Photography and Videography for the real estate, construction, and utilities industries

 Agricultural Surveying and Application

 sUAS Operator Training

 Product Demonstrations

 Research and Development
There have been no changes in the request for exemption from specific regulations or conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

Thi s letter requests the addition of additional Airframe models for commercial use in the aforementioned service operations. We are petitioning for exemption to enable AeroUAVs to operate additional UAS platforms that have been previously approved by exemptio n or currently under review. Namely:

 F450

- Exemption 11974

 DJI S800

- Exemption 11721

 3DRobotics IRIS+

- Exemption 11419

 3DRobotics Solo

- Exemption 12174 & Exemption 12078

 Yuneec Q500

- Exemption 11842 & Exemption 12077

 SenseFly eBee

- Ex emption 11263

 X PlusOne

- Docket ID FAA

- 2015

- 2092AeroUAVs LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

These sUAS all weigh less than 55 lbs, have a built

- in capability to limit the height flown above the ground, to limit the radius of the distance it flies from the operator and to exclude it from Class B, C and D airspace including a no fly zone feature. Each system also has the failsafe func tion of the autopilot system, which means when the communication between the Main Controller and the transmitter is lost, the system will automatically trigger Return to Home and will land safely.
This submission does not include the Operating Manuals for the first 4 models requested above, as they have been reviewed by the Administrator in granting previous exemptions. Model specifics are listed in the AeroUAVs Operating Manual which is included with this submission. Copies of all Operating Manuals for the individual models listed will be submitted on request.
Accompanying this submission electronically via e

- mail are a cop ies of the AeroUAVs Operations Manual and the AeroUAVs Training Manual submitted to 333exem ptions@faa.gov

.

Regards,

Timothy Ford President and CEO AeroUAVs, LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202 (314) 397

- 1110
##### 



Exhibit 8.1
 [ Form of opinion to be delivered with effectiveness ]
 Fulbright & Jaworski l.l.p.
 telephone: (713) 651-5151
    
    facsimile: (713) 651-5246
  
  Parent Merger Company Merger
Sub Merger
Agreement Registration Statement Information Statement/Proxy Statement/Prospectus SEC
 Documents




---



##### 



Closing Opinion
  Very truly yours,
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Duff & Phelps Corporation, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Jacob Silverman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented therein.





Date:  November
      3, 2009
                /s/
      Jacob L. SilvermanJACOB
      L. SILVERMANChief
      Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2
  
 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Atlantic Green Power Holding Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”), I, R. Scott Byrne, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company, do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
  (1)           the Report fully complies with the requirements of §13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. §78m or 78o(d), and,
  (2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Dated: May 17, 2010
/s/ R.Scott ByrneR.Scott Byrne

Chief Operating Officer, Secretary and Treasurer