alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, John D. Feehan, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



|(1) | the report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods referred to in the Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ John D. Feehan, Jr.
|                        |  |  |  | John D. Feehan, Jr.    
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. and will be retained by Virgin Mobile
USA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 15.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by
reference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-193503) and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No.
333-188286) of RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (the "Company") of our report, dated February 24, 2014, relating to the financial
statements of the Company, which appears in this Annual Report on Form 20-F.



|Tel-Aviv, Israel
        February 24, 2014 | /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman
        Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)
        A member firm
        of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited
|------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### David Jaslove, Respondent, *v.*Majestic Buick, Inc., Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 30, 1958.

*J ack L. Ratzkin*for appellant.

*Herman Goldberg*and *George W. Israel*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

In view of plaintiff’s allegation that the vehicle which he purchased had not been properly conditioned and serviced before delivery to him, the refusal to permit testimony with respect to defendant’s regular procedure in the purchase, inspection and resale of used cars was error.

Under the circumstances of this case the court also erred in refusing to charge the proper measure of damages in an action for breach of warranty, as requested by defendant.

The gratuitous instruction that certain agreements are against public policy, and the court’s statement which followed, constitutes prejudicial error.

Consequently the verdict of the jury and the judgment entered thereon may not be permitted to stand.

The judgment should be reversed and a new trial ordered, with $30 costs to appellant.

Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
#### JOHN E. QUARLES CO. v. LEE et al.

No. 11009.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

Jan. 24, 1934.

CRITZ, Judge.

This is a motion to retax costs filed in this cause by Louisa Lee et al., defendants in error.

.The original opinion in this case is published in 58 S.W.(2d) 77. We refer to that opinion for a full statement of the issues and history of this case. From the opinion it will appear that the John E. Quarles Company obtained a judgment against Louisa Lee et al., defendants in error here, in the district court of Tarrant county, Tex. Louisa Lee et al. appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which court reversed the judgment of the trial court and dismissed the ease. The Quarles Company prosecuted writ of error to this court, and, on' final hearing here, the judgments of both lower courts were reversed and the cause1 remanded to the district court.

Under the above statement it appears that Lee et al. prevailed in the Court of Civil Appeals to the extent 'of having the judgment) of the trial court against them reversed, and the entire cause dismissed. The judgment of the Supreme Court in effect sustained the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals in so far as it reversed the judgment of the trial court, but reversed it in so far as it dismissed the cause.

Under the above statement of the record, we think the John E. Quarles Company should pay all costs in the Court of Civil Appeals, and that Lee et al., should pay all costs in the Supreme Court. Of course, the cost of the transcript in the Court of Civil Appeals should be included in the costs of that court.

We recommend that the costs be retaxed as above, indicated.
##### 



Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
             By:
    /s/ George B. GregoryGeorge B. GregoryChief Executive Officer and President
#### MARISCAL v. STATE.

No. 15765.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 21, 1932.

Chaney & De Graffenreid, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
FEHB Handbook Sample TCC Notice for Separating Employees 

Sample Notice for Separating Employees 

An employing office may use the following sample notice to notify separating employees of their TCC 

rights upon separation: 

Dear (name): 

Your coverage in the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program ends on the last day of the pay 

period in which you separate from Federal service, subject to a 31-day extension of coverage (at no cost to 

you) with opportunity for conversion to an individual contract with your insurance carrier. 

You also have the right to temporarily continue your FEHB coverage for up to 18 months after your 

separation instead of converting to an individual contract at this time. You may select any plan in the FEHB 

Program in which to continue your coverage if you are eligible to enroll in the plan. To continue your 

coverage, you must pay the full amount of the premium (both the employee and Government shares) plus a 

2 percent administrative charge. If you choose to continue your coverage, you have the free coverage 

described above for the first 31 days. Your Temporary Continuation of Coverage (TCC) enrollment and 

premium charges begin on the day after the 31-day period of free coverage ends. If you continue TCC to 

the end of the 18-month period, you will have another 31-day extension of coverage with opportunity for 

conversion to an individual contract. 

If you are interested in continuing your FEHB coverage, you can get additional information and an election 

form by calling (Name of person to contact) at (telephone number) or you can pick up the material at the 

following address: (enter address). 

If you want to continue your coverage, your election form must be received at the address shown below 

within 60 days after the date of separation or 65 days after the date of this notice, whichever is later. Bring 

or mail your election form to: (enter address) 

We also want to inform you that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) did not 

eliminate TCC or change the TCC rules. If you would like to learn more about the ACA including 

the health insurance marketplace, please visit www.healthcare.gov. 

Sincerely, 

(Name of appropriate official) 

If your employing office gives this notice directly to you, it should add the following note and make two 

copies of the notice: 

I acknowledge receipt of this notice. 

Employee's signature Date 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Donald Coalts, Defendant.

County Court, Schenectady County,

June 11, 1958.

*Thomas F. Fyvie, Jr.*for defendant.

*Morris Marshall Cohn, District Attorney (James H. Gould*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Archibald O. Wemple, J.

This motion was heard by this court on June 6, 1958. The District Attorney filed with the court photo static copies of the record of conviction of the defendant in Dutchess County, in the County Court at Poughkeepsie, New York. The record shows that on November 23, 1937 the defendant was personally in open court and represented by Alex. C. Dow, Esq., attorney, at which time he was arraigned, and pled guilty to an indictment charging him with forgery, second degree, and that he was sentenced on December 14, 1937 on said charge to Dutchess County jail for three months by Honorable J. Gordon Flannery, Presiding Judge.

The record further shows that this defendant made application for an order vacating said conviction and sentence imposed *657on December 14, 1937 in the County Court, Dutchess County, on March 26,1953, which application was denied by the court.

Since the record clearly shows that the defendant pled guilty to a felony, namely forgery in the second degree, and was sentenced on such felony in Dutchess County on December 14, 1937, the ” sentence imposed in Schenectady County at a later date, namely July 1, 1941, was properly a sentence of this defendant as a second offender.

The presumption of the regularity of proceedings has not been overcome by the petitioner. In fact, the records adequately and amply substantiate that the sentence of this defendant as a second offender on July 1, 1941 was legal and proper.

Application denied. Submit order.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed December 10, 2020 

# S

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00736-CV IN THE INTEREST OF C .R.L., III, A CHILD On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-12751 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Myers, Osborne, and Carlyle Opinion by Justice Osborne The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated August 14, 2020, we notified appellant the $205 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure t o do so would result in dismi ssal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated August 14, 2020, we informed appellant the do cketing statement in this case was due. We cauti oned appellant tha t failure to f ile the docketing statement within ten days might result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. By letter dated Octobe r 29, 2020, we informed appellan t the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for the clerk ’s record. We directed–2– appellant to provide, within ten days, (1) verification of paym ent or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record, or (2) written documentation that a ppellant had been found entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned app ellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without furt her notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing stat ement, provided the required documentation, or othe rwise corresponded with the Cour t regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3( b); 42.3(b), (c).

200736F.P05 /Leslie Osborne/ LESLIE OSBORNE JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
IN THE INTEREST OF C.R.L., III, A CHILD

No. 05-20-00736-CV On Appeal from the 303rd Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF-19-12751. Opinion delivered by Justice Osborne. Justices Myers and Carlyle participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this app eal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee CHARMAIN E CARBS AND THE STATE OF TEXAS recover their costs of t his appeal from appellant CHAR LES, LEE, II.
Judgment entered December 10, 2020
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Derek Page, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Sombrio Capital Corp. (the Company), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Sombrio Capital
      Corp. for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2008 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                    



Dated: June 18, 2008



/s/ Derek PageDerek
Page Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal
Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sombrio Capital
Corp. and will be retained by Sombrio Capital Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
United States Office of Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 22-901 Date: November 10, 2022

Subject: New Federal Long Term Care Insurance 

Program (FLTCIP) Regulations and Announcement 

of Suspension Period for FLTCIP Applicants

This Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) informs agencies of a suspension 

period for all new FLTCIP applications. 

Suspension of FLTCIP Applications 

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is suspending applications for 

coverage in the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP) to 

allow OPM and the FLTCIP Carrier the time to thoroughly assess the benefit 

offerings and establish sustainable premium rates that reasonably and 

equitably reflect the cost of the benefits provided, as required under 5 

U.S.C. 9003(b)(2). OPM will be issuing a final regulation within the next 

week to finalize rules for the suspension of applications for coverage and the 

requirements around any such suspension periods.

OPM has determined that a suspension of applications for FLTCIP coverage, 

including coverage increases, is in the best interest of the Program. OPM 

intends to publish a Federal Register Notice of Suspension for current and 

newly eligible individuals applying for coverage under the FLTCIP within days 

after the final regulation is published. The effective date will be 30 days after 

the date of the notice.

Individuals not currently enrolled may not apply for coverage, and current 

enrollees may not apply to increase their coverage during the suspension 

period. The suspension will remain in effect for 24 months, unless OPM

issues a subsequent notice to end or extend the extension period. Newly 
2 

Benefits Administration Letter 22-901

eligible employees and newly eligible spouses of employees may apply with 

abbreviated underwriting until the start of the suspension period. 

Eligible individuals who submit an application for FLTCIP to the program

administrator, Long Term Care Partners, LLC, prior to the start of the

suspension period will have their application considered. If the Carrier

approves the application for coverage, then the individual will receive a

benefit booklet and schedule of benefits with complete coverage

information.

The enrollment status or benefit eligibility of current enrollees does not

change. Their coverage will continue if they are currently enrolled. For those

in a claim status, there is no change to coverage and claims reimbursement

process.

Other Updates Related to the FLTCIP Final Regulation

In the coming weeks, OPM will issue another BAL on the regulatory changes

and recommendations for employing agencies.

If you have any questions regarding this BAL, please contact Healthcare and

Insurance’s Life and Ancillary Benefits group at LTC@opm.gov.

Sincerely,

Laurie Bodenheimer

Associate Director

Healthcare and Insurance
#### CAMPBELL v. STATE.

No. 20178.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

A. G. Biggs, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is robbery; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for IS years.

The record fails to show a judgment of conviction. In the absence of such judgment this court is without jurisdiction.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### COOK v. STATE (two cases).

Nos. 14049, 14051.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March *4,*1931.

Rehearing Denied April 8, 1931.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*158CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is swindling, a misdemeanor; the punishment, confinement in jail for thirty-days.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed. -

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal .Appeals and approved by the court.

HAWKINS, J., not sitting.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Russell Schechter, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: November 12, 2009  /s/ Russell Schechter Russell Schechter President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  The undersigned, Barry Hollander, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director of Techs Loanstar, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Techs Loanstar, Inc. for the period ended July 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Techs Loanstar, Inc.  Dated: June 16, 2011  /s/ Barry Hollander
Name: Barry Hollander
Title: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided Techs Loanstar, Inc. and will be retained by Techs Loanstar, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.