alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.9


(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE


Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of October 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master
Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association,
as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank
Trust Company Americas as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian
and Situs Holdings LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE3 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of its
performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2014.


/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank



Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

January 24, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

135019 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

JON JENKINS,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 135019 

 COA: 268175 

Genesee CC: 04-078388-NI 

CHARLES KOESTER, 

Defendant, 

and 

FARM BUREAU INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 28, 2007 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

TAYLOR, CJ., and YOUNG, J., would reverse this case for the reasons stated in the 

Court of Appeals dissenting opinion. 

p0117 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 24, 2008 

 Clerk
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference
is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of November 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage &
Asset Receiving Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and
Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE4
(the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant
to Section 10.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify
that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2016 through
December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made
under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28thday of February 2017.















Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank
**OFFICER CERTIFICATE**

**Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc.**

**                     Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates**

**Series 2012-C5**

March 1, 2013 

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Subservicing Agreement (the 

"Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"), 

(i)  a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the "Reporting 

Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under the undersigned officer's supervision; 

(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review, theServicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are set forth below; and 

Nature and Status of Failures: None. 

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION d/b/a MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES 

/s/ Steven W. Smith  

Steven W. Smith Executive Vice President
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.5G

CHS LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Fiscal 2018-Fiscal 2020 Plan Appendix






Fiscal 2018-2020 RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL GOALS



Note: Compensation earned for any Performance Period is mathematically interpolated when performance results occur between the three ROIC Performance Targets.


RETURN ON INVESTED CAPITAL EXPLANATION





*Funded Debt is the average of the funded debt at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2018 and at the end of Fiscal Year 2020, and Equity is the equity at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2018.
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3231 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 12, 2016 

Received 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect unpaid 

interns in the Federal Government from workplace harassment and discrimination, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 3231 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Intern Protec3 tion Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2302 of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(g)(1) All protections afforded to an employee under 

9 subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D) of subsection (b)(1) shall 

10 be afforded, in the same manner and to the same extent, 

11 to an intern and an applicant for internship. 

12 ‘‘(2) For purposes of the application of this sub13 section, a reference to an employee shall be considered a 

14 reference to an intern in— 

15 ‘‘(A) section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 

16 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–16); 

17 ‘‘(B) sections 12 and 15 of the Age Discrimina18 tion in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 631, 

19 633a); and 

20 ‘‘(C) section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 

21 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791). 

22 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘intern’ means an 

23 individual who performs uncompensated voluntary service 

24 in an agency to earn credit awarded by an educational in25 stitution or to learn a trade or occupation.’’. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

3 

HR 3231 RDS

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3111(c)(1) 

2 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

3 ‘‘section 2302(g) (relating to prohibited personnel prac4 tices),’’ before ‘‘chapter 81’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 11, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15** 
**- 2292** 

SHEILA C. SIMMS ,
Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
CHUCK HAGEL, Secretary, Department of Defense, Defense Logistics Agency ,
Defendant

– Appellee,

and

DEBORAH A. WOLFE, Defense Logistics Agency, Aviation Richmond; JULIA A. BRANDON, Defense Logistics Agency, Aviation Richmond ,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond

. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. ( 3:14

- cv

- 00433

- REP )

Submitted : March 17, 2016 Decided: March 21, 2016

Before WILKINSON , NIEMEYER , and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Sheila C. Simms , Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Holland Hambrick, Assistant U nited S tates Attorney , Richmond, Virginia, for2 Appellee

.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Sheila C. Simms appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on her complaint raising claims under the Rehabilitation

Act of 1973. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons s tated by the

district court. Simms v. Hagel , No. 3:14

- cv

- 00433

- REP (E.D. Va.

Aug. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral a rgument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NICK R. SMITH,

Petitioner,

 v. Civil Action No. 20-301 (JEB)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Respondent.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Pro se Petitioner Nick R. Smith’s habeas Petition strings together a series of farfetched 

allegations, requiring sua sponte dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Smith commences his pleading thus: “Here now comes the Government of New Zion a 

Sovereign Ecclesiastic State, the Petitioner On behalf of the HRM King Nicodemus (By the 

people and the Constitution of New Zion King), aka Nicki Ray Smith a Citizens owned by (as 

per Exhibit #’s 1,2,3 and 7,) and subject of New Zion an International Corporation and a 

nonprofit Corporation in the USA . . . .” Pet. at 1-2. He later continues: “Petititioner’s now 

shows the Worldwide objective claim of ‘stated claim’ that he is king of a kingdom of a country 

of government established by god himself with blessing of the threat toward the authority of a 

sovereign state of a new nation of freedom power of hope and peace and security justice . . .” Id.

at 3 (all caps deleted). There are further attachments purporting to show, e.g., the oath of 

citizenship of New Zion, id., Exh. 2, a Certificate of Citizenship for King Nicodemus of New 

Zion, id., Exh. 3, and the New Zion Constitution. Id., Exh. 4.
2

On rare occasions, a court may dismiss a case sua sponte for lack of subject-matter 

jurisdiction. This occurs where a complaint is “‘patently insubstantial,’ presenting no federal 

question suitable for decision.” Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994) (quoting

Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 n.6 (1989)) (additional citation omitted). This standard 

requires that the “claims be flimsier than ‘doubtful or questionable’ – they must be ‘essentially 

fictitious.’” Id. (quoting Hagans v. Levine, 415 U.S. 528, 536-37 (1973)). Claims that fall into 

this category include “bizarre conspiracy theories, any fantastic government manipulations of 

[the] will or mind, [and] any sort of supernatural intervention.” Id. As a general rule, this

procedural vehicle is “reserved for complaints resting on truly fanciful factual allegations,” while 

12(b)(6) dismissals “cull legally deficient complaints.” Id. at 331 n.5. 

As Petitioner’s status and thus his factual allegations are fanciful at best, the Court will 

dismiss the case without prejudice. In any event, the only possible legal claims he articulates 

relate to state trial proceedings in Georgia, see Pet. at 3-4, which this Court has no power to 

review. A separate Order memorializing the dismissal will issue this day.

 

/s/ James E. Boasberg

JAMES E. BOASBERG

United States District Judge

Date: February 7, 2020
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
 OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
 THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Electronic Cigarettes International Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended March 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Brent David Willis, Chief Executive Officer of Electronic Cigarettes International Group, Ltd., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date: April 1, 2015
By:
/s/ Brent David WillisBrent David WillisChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement System Insurance Program System 

United States         Office of  Personnel Management The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency    Retirement and Insurance Service 

Payroll Office Letter                                                     Number: P-00-21 Date:  September 21, 2000  SUBJECT: HB-PC  -  REQUIREMENTS FOR “SURVIVOR ANNUITANTS” AND 

PROCESSING REEMPLOYED ANNUITANT WAIVERS  We have discovered that there are individuals who are receiving “survivor annuities” from OPM and, at the same time, are active Federal employees.  These individuals are different than reemployed annuitants, in that they are the survivors of, but probably not, retired federal employees themselves.  Like reemployed annuitants, however, these individuals have their health benefits premiums deducted from their monthly annuities.   If you have employees who identify themselves as “survivor annuitants,” please advise them that they are eligible for Health Benefits Premium Conversion (HB-PC), as long as they are employed in a position that conveys FEHB eligibility (i.e. a permanent position).  Similarly to reemployed annuitants, we will need you to send us their names, social security numbers, and dates of birth so we can transfer their health benefits coverage to you.  Although not required, this information can be placed on spreadsheets, following the same formats you used to report reemployed annuitants to us.  This information should be emailed to finance@opm.gov  When either reemployed annuitants or “survivor” annuitants waive participation in HB-PC or leave employment with your agency, you must notify us as soon as possible so that we can transfer their health benefits coverage back to OPM.  This notification should reference Payroll Office Letters P-00-13 and P-00-21 and be mailed to:  

OPM Retirement Operations Center Boyers, PA 16017 

 If you have any questions concerning these matters, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov.  We can, however, be reached at 202-606-0666.  

                                                           Robert A. Yuran, Chief                                                  Financial Policy Staff 

                                                          Retirement and Insurance Service    

mailto:finance@opm.gov

mailto:finance@opm.gov
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Global Aviation Holdings Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A. Garrett, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods referred to in the Report.

 
|                              |   |                          |
|-----------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------|
| Date: August 15,   2011 | By:    | /s/ William   A. Garrett |
|                              |   | William   A. Garrett          |
|                              |   | Chief   Financial Officer     |

 

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global Aviation Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Global Aviation Holdings Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

1

----
Exhibit 32

OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2009 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Ronald O. Black                  
|                      |  | Ronald O. Black                      
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Date: August 14, 2009 |  | /s/ Thomas W. Wayne                  
|                      |  | Thomas W. Wayne                      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer              

* This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard
contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



34
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number 12–202 Date: May 15, 2012

Subject: Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Program: Revision of 

Standard Form (SF) 2817, “Life Insurance Election” 

Why did OPM revise the form?

We revised the form to reflect changes in FEGLI Program regulations previously 

announced in BAL 11-201 dated February 1, 2011. Please review the new form carefully, 

as some of the changes are significant. 

What is new on the form?

We revised the Instructions for Agencies to reflect changes in the regulations which 

state an eligible employee: 

• has 60 days to elect new coverage

• can elect any and all coverage based on a qualifying life event (except the 

employee must elect or have Basic first in order to elect Optional coverage). 

We added language in the Instructions for Agencies that the human resources (HR) 

office should verify whether the employee is eligible to make an election, and to review it 

carefully before processing. We reemphasized that the employee is responsible for 

ensuring that the SF 2817 accurately reflects the employee’s intentions. 

We also revised the corresponding language in the Table of Effective Dates on the Back 

of Part 2 to reflect the new time limit and the expanded coverage election opportunity 

based on a qualifying life event (QLE). 

Two new events were added to the “Event Allowing Change” in the Table of Effective 

Dates. We did this to clarify the types of elections eligible employees can make. For 

example, the HR office should enter Event “0” in Section 5 if the election is by a new or 

newly eligible employee and the other events listed on the table do not apply. The other 

event applies to certain Department of Defense (DoD) civilian employees affected by 

contingency operations. The other event numbers have not changed.
What is the revision date?

November 2011. 

How do you order the form? 

GSA will not be stocking this form due to the low demand for the published version. An 

increasing number of employees either utilize electronic enrollment through their 

agencies or download and print the form locally. 

It is available now on the OPM website in a PDF-fillable version at 

http://www.opm.gov/insure/life/fegli/sf2817.asp. If individual agencies need a published 

version for their forms stock, however, they should download the PDF file and submit a 

printing request to the Government Printing Office. 

Can you use previous editions? 

No, you cannot use previous editions because of the new guidance on the form. You 

should only use the November 2011 version. 

If you have any other questions or comments regarding this BAL, you may email us at 

fegli@opm.gov. For more information on the FEGLI Program, please visit 

www.opm.gov/insure/life. 

 

 

 John O’Brien 

Director

Healthcare and Insurance
# Official Journal C 129/5 Ma

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 129 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 475 May 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 129

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 475 May 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 129/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 129/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 129/2 | Notice to readers | s3 |

2004/C 129/2

Notice to readers

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### ADRIAN v. STATE.

No. 20408.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1939.

Robert A. Sone, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson-, State’s Atty,, of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for cattle theft, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUSTIN CORLISS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 459 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2021, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.