alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BARBUZZA v. STATE.

No. 16364.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 8, 1933.

Robert H. Hopkins, of Denton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was charged in the first count of the information with having sold inferior gasoline in violation of article 1105, P. C., and in the second count.with acting as the distributor of gasoline without having first obtained a valid permit from the comptroller as required by law. Conviction was had under each count, the jury having assessed the punishment under the first count at a fine of $25, and- under the second count at a fine of $100.

We find in the transcript an entry to the effect that recognizance was entered into by appellant, naming his sureties, but nowhere in the transcript does such recognizance appear. The memoranda does not show such recognizance as would authorize this court to take note of the appeal. Jenkins v. State, 86 Tex. Cr. R. 266, 216 S. W. 183.

The appeal is therefore ordered dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3459 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3459

 To clarify the treatment of two or more employers as joint employers 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2015

 Mr. Kline (for himself, Mr. Roe of Tennessee, Mr. Walberg, Ms. Foxx, 
 Mr. Rokita, Mr. Wilson of South Carolina, Mr. Hunter, Mr. Thompson of 
   Pennsylvania, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Barletta, Mr. Heck of 
  Nevada, Mr. Messer, Mr. Byrne, Mr. Carter of Georgia, Mr. Bishop of 
Michigan, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Russell, Mr. Curbelo of Florida, Mr. Allen, 
Mr. Chabot, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Smith of Missouri, Mr. 
    Hardy, and Mr. Knight) introduced the following bill; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To clarify the treatment of two or more employers as joint employers 
                under the National Labor Relations Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Protecting Local Business 
Opportunity Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF JOINT EMPLOYERS.

    Section 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C. 152(2)) 
is amended by adding at the end the following: ``Notwithstanding any 
other provision of this Act, two or more employers may be considered 
joint employers for purposes of this Act only if each shares and 
exercises control over essential terms and conditions of employment and 
such control over these matters is actual, direct, and immediate.''.
                                 <all>
```
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6338

LUTHER ROBERT BROWN, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

WARDEN, LUNENBURG CORRECTIONAL CENTER,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-99-76-7)

Submitted: September 21, 2000 Decided: September 27, 2000

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Luther Robert Brown, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Drummond

Bagwell, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Luther Robert Brown, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. Warden, Lunenburg Correctional Ctr., No. CA-99-76-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 15, 2000).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Sombrio Capital Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Bleeden, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:  1.The Report fully complies with requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2.The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.    /s/ David BleedenDavid BleedenChief Executive Officer andChief Financial OfficerApril 6, 2011
Order entered February 19, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00092-CR

SYED SARTAJ NAWAZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 199th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 199-81120-2017

ORDER

On September 13, 2019, we ordered court reporter Sheri Vecera to file a supplemental 

reporter’s record of the September 30, 2016 hearing on the pre-indictment application for writ of 

habeas corpus seeking a bond reduction. She did not do so. By order dated January 14, 2020, 

we again ordered her to file a supplemental reporter’s record and cautioned her that the failure to 

do so would result in the Court ordering she not sit until the supplemental reporter’s record was 

filed. 

This case is set for submission on February 25, 2020. To date, no supplemental reporter’s 

record of the September 30, 2016 hearing on the pre-indictment application for writ of habeas 

corpus seeking a bond reduction has been filed.
–2–

We ORDER court reporter Sheri Vecera not to sit until the supplemental reporter’s 

record is filed.

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to the Honorable Angela Tucker, 

Presiding Judge, 199th Judicial District Court; Sheri Vecera, official court reporter; Collin 

County Auditor’s Office; and counsel for all parties. 

/s/ LANA MYERS

PRESIDING JUSTICE
#### Dock BIGHAM v. STATE.

No. 17740.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Chrisman & Russell, of Cleburne, and W. E. Myres and Joseph M. Mills, both 'of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

This is a prosecution had under the provisions of what is known as the Dean Law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in an opinion this day handed down in Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the judgment in this case is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, by andamong Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CertificateAdministrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as Trust Advisor and DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C8 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”), and ofits performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice PresidentWells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
Fact Sheet

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Members of Congress and 

Congressional Staff

OPM has published a final rule to clarify eligibility for health insurance benefits 

coverage under the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program for 

Members of Congress and certain congressional staff members due to§1312 of the 

Affordable Care Act.

The following changes have been made in the final rule: 

OPM has clarified that Members of Congress and designated 

congressional staff must enroll in an appropriate SHOP as determined by 

the Director in order to receive a Government contribution.

References to annuitants purchasing coverage on the Exchange have been 

deleted in the final rule.

OPM has provided a one month extension for staff designations for the

2014 plan year. 

Additional non-substantive edits have been made to improve clarity. 

Current FEHB plan coverage for Members of Congress and congressional staff 

employed by the official office of a Member of Congress will terminate on 

December 31, 2013. An additional 31 days of coverage is included after the

termination date at no cost to the enrollee. 

Members of Congress and designated congressional staff who choose to purchase 

health insurance via the appropriate SHOP as determined by the Director may do 

so with an effective date of January 1, 2014.

Given the location of Congress in the District of Columbia, OPM will work with 

the DC Health Benefit Exchange Authority (DC SHOP) to implement this rule. 

For plan year 2014, Members of Congress and designated congressional staff will 

choose from 112 options in the Gold Metal tier on the DC SHOP. 

Open Season dates for DC SHOP coverage will coincide with FEHB Open 

Season dates. Coverage will be effective January 1, 2014. 

OPM is planning to launch a web site with additional information in the near 

future. 

Nothing in this rule or the law prevents a Member of Congress or designated 

congressional staff from declining a Government contribution for him or herself 

by choosing a different option for their health insurance coverage. 
All Members of Congress, including representatives of U.S. Territories, and their 

designated staff will be required to purchase health insurance via the DC SHOP in 

order to receive a Government contribution. The DC SHOP offers health plan 

options with in-network access to medical providers across the nation and 

overseas. 

Members of Congress and congressional administrative staff are best equipped to 

make the determination as to whether an individual is employed by the “official 

office” of that member. Designations must be made prior to November 2013 for 

the coverage year starting January 1, 2014 and October for subsequent plan years. 

No Federal funds, including administrative funds, will be used to cover abortions 

or administer plans that cover abortions. 

Nothing in OPM’s final rule changes eligibility for other Federal benefits 

programs.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22657]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 367 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-719, K2024-12.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22657 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 4.2

 

CAREY WATERMARK INVESTORS 2 INCORPORATED

 

A Corporation Formed Under the Laws of the State of Maryland

 

TO:

 

FROM:  Carey Watermark Investors 2 Incorporated

 

DATE:

 

You are hereby notified that you are the record owner of                                                  (              ) fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Carey Watermark Investors 2 Incorporated (the “Corporation”), which were issued to you in exchange for                  .  Such shares do not have physical certificates, are recorded on the books and records of the Corporation, and shall be held subject to the laws of the State of Maryland and to all of the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation of the Corporation and the Bylaws of the Corporation and any amendments thereto.

 

THE SECURITIES REFERENCED HEREIN HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR THE APPLICABLE SECURITIES ACT OF ANY STATE, BUT HAVE BEEN ISSUED IN RELIANCE UPON EXEMPTIONS FROM REGISTRATION CONTAINED IN SAID ACTS. NO SALE, OFFER TO SELL OR OTHER TRANSFER OF THE SECURITIES REFERENCED HEREIN MAY BE MADE UNLESS A REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER SAID ACTS IS IN EFFECT WITH RESPECT TO THE SECURITIES, OR AN EXEMPTION FROM THE REGISTRATION PROVISIONS OF SUCH ACTS IS THEN APPLICABLE.
EX-35.6

(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, Na
CMBS Department
MAC N9401-011
1055 10th Avenue S.e.
Minneapolis, MN  55414


Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation
60 Wall Street
New York, NY 10005


RE:  Annual Statement of Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as
Custodian (in such capacity, "Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of
and for the year ending December 31, 2012 (the "reporting period"):

(a) A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its
performance under the applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A
hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has been made under my supervision; and

(b) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all
material respects throughout the reporting period, except as noted on Schedule
B.


August 21, 2013



/s/Kathleen Marshall
Kathleen Marshall
Vice President


(page)


To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series


1. Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, by and among
DEUTSCHE MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO
BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A
DIVISION OF PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee, and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as
Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator,
Paying Agent and Custodian relating to the Series COMM 2012-CCRE2 Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates.


(page)


To:  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule B

Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations

Not Applicable
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2015-8432 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-100-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 6 $ 510.00 $0 $ 510.00 92 $46,920.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance:

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $46,920

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Repair & 

Replacement 6.0 $ 510.00 $9,500 $10,010.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
EX-35.3
(logo) MIDLAND    (logo) PNC
       LOAN              REAL ESTATE
       SERVICES

OFFICER CERTIFICATE

Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corp.
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
COMM 2012-CCRE2


March 1, 2013

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
(the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank, National
Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan
Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),

(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the calendar year 2012 (the
"Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under the undersigned officer's supervision;
(ii) to the best of the undersigned officer's knowledge, based on such review,
the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all
material respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a
failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, each such
failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are
set forth below; and

Nature and Status of Failures: None.

PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION
d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES


/s/ Steven W. Smith
Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

Member of The PNC Financial Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard  Overland Park, Kansas 66210
800-327-8083
www.pnc.com/midland
#### Midboro Management, Appellant, *v.*J. Coleman Scal, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 27, 1958.

*Arthur T. Kaplan*and *Irving L. Kalish*for appellant.

*Myron J. Greene*and *Martin Greene*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

The written agreement, wherein tenant covenanted to vacate on September 30,1957 was based upon mutual considerations. It was coextensive with and contemplated a new reasonable rent and lease. The lease did not have the effect of merging the agreement into the lease. The lease merely recited the rights and obligations of the parties for the period fixed in the main agreement during which tenant was to remain in occupancy until the stated vacating date of September 30, 1957.

Landlord’s proceeding is brought pursuant to the provisions of subdivision (g) of section 8 of the Business Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.). It did not seek possession under the automatic surrender clause in the lease. It sought possession by virtue of the independent separate written agreement wherein tenant agreed to vacate on or before a specific fixed date. This was within the contemplation of the statute.

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and final order directed for landlord as prayed for in petition, with costs.

*933Heoht, J. P., and Timer, J., concur; Aurelio, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the opinion of the court below. (11 Mise 2d 1098.)

Final order reversed, etc.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

# mtniteb**~tate5 ~ourt**  

# of**~peaI5** 

# for tbe jf

# eberaI (!Circuit
RAKHMATULLA ASATOV, 

### Petitioner, 

### v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, 

### Respondent.

2013-3020 Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. PH1221120263-W-1. 

### ON MOTION

ORDER Rakhmatulla Asatov moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Upon consideration thereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT: The motion is granted. Case: 13-3020 Document: 3 Page: 1 Filed: 11/05/2012RAKHMATULLA ASATOVv. ARMY

s24 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2 Case: 13-3020 Document: 3 Page: 2 Filed: 11/05/2012