alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Geovic Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Greg Hill, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |     |  |               |  |                                  
|------------------ |  |  |  | --- |  | ------------- |  | ---------------------------------
|                   |  |  | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Greg Hill
|                   |  |  |  |     |  |               |  | Greg Hill Chief Financial
Officer
#### Sam THOMAS v. STATE.

No. 17793.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Crumpton & Boswell, of Texarkana, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

This is a prosecution had under the provisions of what is known as the Dean Law (Pen.Cod'e 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in an opinion this day handed down in Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the judgment in this case is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

September 20, 2013
Exhibit
32.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Nacel Energy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Turner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


/s/
      Paul TurnerPaul
      TurnerChief
      Executive Officer





August
13, 2009
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of BLVD HOLDINGS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John G. Simmonds, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge and belief:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


|               |                                                                                    |                     
|-------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | --------------------
|               |                                                                                    |                     
|               |                                                                                    |                     
|March 31, 2014 | By:                                                                                | /s/ JOHN G. SIMMONDS
|               | John G. Simmonds                                                                  
|               | President, CEO, Director, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986

 

Federal Employee Benefit Programs

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LETTER

Number: F-98-05 Date: April 24, 1998 

Subject: The Conner Decision

This letter is to advise you of a decision of the United States Court of Appeals in Conner v.

OPM. As a result of Conner, some employees have been erroneously placed in the Federal

Employees Retirement System (FERS). We will be issuing detailed instructions on necessary

payroll changes in the near future.

In brief, Conner will require payroll offices to make retroactive adjustments to individual

employee records and contributions remitted to OPM. It requires a new rule be applied to all

retirement coverage determinations made on or after 

January 1, 1987. Generally, most employees, who were automatically placed under FERS,

despite having completed five years of creditable civilian service before 1987, should have been

placed under Civil Service Retirement System-Offset (CSRS-Offset) coverage, with a right to

elect FERS. 

 

Most employees, affected by Conner will be afforded an opportunity to:

o K remain in FERS; or

oK have his or her coverage corrected to CSRS-offset 

oK if the employee makes no election, he/she will be deemed to have elected FERS

If you or your staff have any questions, please contact us on (202) 606-0666, or send an email,

finance@opm.gov.

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service
1

Order entered September 1, 2016

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-16-01036-CV

IN RE: DERIC VALDEZ, Relator

On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-11-07033

ORDER

Upon review of the August 30, 2016 petition for writ of mandamus, it appears the 

appendix and reporter’s record supporting the petition include unredacted information that 

identifies the relator’s minor child. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9(a). It further appears the petition does 

not comply with the requirements of rule 52 in that the documents included in the appendix are 

neither sworn nor certified copies. TEX. R. APP. P. 52.3(k); 52.7(a)(1). In addition, the petition 

does not include the certification required by Rule 52.3(j), does not include the certificate of 

compliance required by Rule 9.4(i)(3), and is not in 14-point font as required by Rule 9.4(e). 

TEX. R. APP. P. 9.4(e), 9.4(i)(3), 52.3(j). 

Accordingly, we STRIKE the petition and supporting appendix. TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9(b). 

We grant relator leave to file a redrawn petition that complies with Rules 9.4, 9.9, and 52 of the 

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure on or before September 8, 2016. We caution relator that 
2

failure to file a properly drawn petition as permitted by this order may result in the dismissal of 

this cause without further notice.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG 

JUSTICE
#### ZELIOS v. STATE.

No. 17708.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Jesse Owens, of Vernon, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of selling spirituous liquor, to wit, whisky, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 2 years.

Pending the appeal of this case, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which the conviction was had has been repealed. See Acts 44th Leg. 2d Called Session, § 49, article 1 of Liquor Control Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 49), and Guy Meadows v. State, 38 S.W.(2d) 481, this day decided by this court.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2014 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle:   President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:   March 23, 2015/s/ Jennifer M. PoppName: Jennifer M. PoppTitle:   Chief Accounting OfficerDate:   March 23, 2015
#### FIDELITY UNION CASUALTY CO. v. FARMERS’ & MERCHANTS’ LUMBER CO.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Oct. 29, 1931.

*148Ward & Ward, of Cleburne, and Collins & Houston, of Dallas, for appellant.

J. M. Moore, of Cleburne, and W. H. Skel-ton, of Alvarado, for appellee.

BARCUS, J.

Appellant has filed its motion for permission to file the record in this cause, to which appellee has filed its contest. The record tendered shows that judgment was rendered in the trial court on May 25, 1931. The motion for new trial was overruled on July 2, 1931. Appellant filed its appeal bond July 13, 1931. Under article 1839 of the Revised Statutes, as it existed on July 13th, when the appeal was perfected, appellant had ninety days in which to file the record in this court. Said article as amended by the 42d Legislature, General Laws, c. 60, p. 100 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 1839), requires the transcript to be filed within sixty days from the final judgment or overruling motion for new trial. This law took effect ninety days after the Legislature adjourned, or August 22,1931. It therefore appears that at the time the amended statute took effect, approximately fifty days of the ninety days allowed appellant had expired. It is the well-settled law of this state that a litigant has no vested right in a remedy, and that the remedial statutes are valid and control litigation from the date they become a law. Phil. H. Pierce Co. v. Watkins, 114 Tex. 153, 263 S. W. 905 and authorities there cited.

The rule in effect adopted by the Supreme Court in Odum v. Garner, 86 Tex. 374, 25 S. W. 18, was that upon the substitution of a new time within which a writ of error could be applied for, the time which elapsed under the former law prior to the time the new law takes effect will be counted in the ratio that it bears to the whole period, and the time of the new law will be computed upon the basis of the ratio that the unexpired term under the old law bears to the whole time. This authority has been cited many times, as is shown by Shepards’ Southwestern Citator, and has been uniformly upheld. The identical question was again involved in Wichita Valley Ry. Co. v. Carter (Tex. Civ. App.) 225 S. W. 592 where many authorities are collated.

Adopting this as being the correct rule, five-ninths of appellant’s time had expired ■ when the new law took effect, and four-ninths of the sixty days given under the new law would have given appellant approximately twenty-eight days after the new law took effect. , The record was tendered in this court on October 2d, which was about forty-four days after the new law took effect and is, under the rule announced in the cited cases, tendered too late for filing.

Appellant’s motion is therefore overruled.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I,
Jennifer M. Davis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect
of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance
statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association.



By:

/s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

August 19, 2016
** **

EX 35.5
**[LETTERHEAD OF WELLS FARGO]**

** **

 

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage &Asset Receiving Corporation

6o Wall Street

New York, NewYork10005

 

 

 

 

 

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

 

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator

and Paying Agent for the Crossgate Mall Mortgage Loan (in such capacity, "Wells Fargo"), hereby

certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2012 (the "reporting period"):

 

(a)A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the reporting period and of its performance under the

applicable servicing agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has

been made under my supervision; and

 

(b)To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations

under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material respects throughout the reporting period, except

as noted in Schedule B.

 

 

 

October 25, 2013

 

 
/s/ Julie Eichler 
 

JULIE EICHLER

Vice President

 

 
**WellsFargo Bank, N.A.** 
 
  
To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

 

Schedule A

**List of Servicing Agreement(s) andSeries**

 

 

Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, by an among DEUTSCHE

MORTGAGE & ASSET RECEIVING CORPORATION, as Depositor, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION, as Master Servicer, MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES, A DIVISION OF PNC BANK

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Special Servicer, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee,

and PARK BRIDGE LENDER SERVICES LLC, as Operating Advisor and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as

Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian relating to the Series COMM 2012-CCRE2

Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, relating to the Crossgates Mall Loan Combination,

a pari passu portion of which is included in the Series COMM 2012-CCRE3 Commercial Mortgage

Pass-Through Certificates transaction

 

 

 

** **

****
  
 

 To: Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation

Schedule B

 

 

**Material Non-Compliance with Servicing Obligations**

 

 

Not Applicable
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 17 CFR 240.13(a)-14(a)
(SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION)
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Western Dubuque Biodiesel, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant, as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants third fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal controls over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 14, 2008
    
    /s/ George Davis

George Davis, Treasurer and Director(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)