alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Azalee Martin, Individually, and as Administratrix of the Estate of Roger Martin, Deceased, Plaintiff, *v.*Housing Authority of the City of New York, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

February 24, 1958.

*Eugene Kahn*for plaintiff.

*Bernard Kelfenstein*for defendant.

Edward G. Baker, J.

On this motion for leave to serve a proposed notice of claim upon the Housing Authority of the City of New York pursuant to subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law the claimant, the mother and administratrix of the estate of Roger Martin, deceased, asserts that on August 1, 1957 the said Roger Martin, then an infant 12 years of age, while playing in the playground of a housing project owned by the Housing Authority, was caused to fall to the ground and cut his left hand on a piece of glass; that, since the injury appeared to be slight, no claim was then made, but on November 5, 1957, claimant learned for the first time that the infant’s ulnar nerve had been severed at the time of the fall and that immediate surgery was necessary; that on November 11, 1957 during surgery the infant died.

The proposed notice of claim asserts a claim for personal injuries sustained by the infant and another claim for his wrongful death. The Housing Authority does not oppose the application for leave to file a notice of claim with respect to the alleged wrongful death but opposes the application so far as it relates to the claim for personal injuries.

Under subdivision 5 of section 50-e, the discretionary power of the court to grant leave to serve a notice of claim after the *650expiration of the time provided in subdivision 1 of the statute is limited. It may exercise its discretion only with respect to a clamant who is an infant or who is mentally or physically incapacitated and by reason of such disability fails to serve the notice within the specified time; or with respect to the representative of a person who dies within the time limited to make a claim. The claimant here is not the infant but the personal representative of the infant. There is nothing in the statute which empowers the court to permit the late filing insofar as the claim relates to the personal injuries allegedly sustained by the infant. A personal representative of an infant may be given leave to file a late notice in the event of the infant’s death within the statutory period. Here, however, the infant’s right terminated at the expiration of 90 days after the date of the accident and, since that right had not been extended, nothing remained to accrue to the personal representative.

The statute is clear and positive. Any other interpretation would extend the statute beyond the bounds of the plain legislative intent.

Accordingly the motion is granted to the extent consented to by the Housing Authority of the City of New York and is otherwise denied.

Submit order.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 04-301 Date: February 24, 2004 

SUBJECT: IMPUTED COST FACTORS FOR SECOND QUARTER OF FY 2004 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program (FEHB) for the second quarter of FY 2004. These cost factors will be provided to you near 

the end of the first, second and third quarters of the Fiscal Year. The imputed cost factors related to 

“Pensions” and Life Insurance will rarely change during the fiscal year and are not provided in this 

letter. Please refer to BAL 03-309 for the FY 2003 imputed cost factors relating to “Pensions” and 

Life Insurance as well as for the guidelines for computing your imputed costs. 

The imputed cost factor for the second quarter of FY 2004 related to the FEHB is $1,096. Thus, the 

FY 2004 year-to-date imputed cost factor related to the FEHB is: 

1st Quarter $1,077

2nd Quarter $1,096

Year-to-date $2,173

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. You may of course call us on 202-606-0606. 

Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

Financial Policy Group 

Center for Financial Services 

Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal 

Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal 

Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal 

Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of SaveDaily, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael F. Cronin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/    MICHAEL f. CRONIN | 
|------------------------ | 
|                         | 
|Michael F. Cronin        | 
|Chief Financial Officer  | 
|                         | 
|November 14, 2012        | 



A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying
the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350,
chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTER

U. S. Office of Personnel Management

 Number: P-97-12 Date: September 5, 1997 

 Subject: CPDF CODES FOR REVISED CSRS CONTRIBUTION RATES

Payroll Office Letter P-97-10 dated August 14, 1997, announced the change in the agency

contribution rate for the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) which is effective October 1, 1997. All

agencies, with the exception of the U.S. Postal Service and the Metropolitan Washington Airports

Authority, must contribute an increased percentage of the basic pay of CSRS-covered employees, effective

with the first pay period beginning on or after October 1, 1997. 

We are issuing this letter to provide the Central Personnel Data File (CPDF) codes for the CSRS

employee classifications. The new agency contribution rates for each category of CSRS employee are:

Classification CPDF Code Percentage of Basic Pay (%)

CSRS Regular; CSRS Regular Offset 1, R, C 8.51

CSRS Special; CSRS Special Offset: 6, T, E 9.01

Congressional employees, Law

enforcement officers, Firefighters

Members of Congress, Court of no CPDF codes 9.51

Federal Claims judges, U.S.

magistrates, U.S. Court of Appeals for

Armed Forces judges, Bankruptcy

judges

If you have any questions on this matter, please call us on (202) 606-0666 or via email,

finance@opm.gov.

William J. Washington, Chief

Financial Management Division

Retirement and Insurance Service
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Form
10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ David L. Calhoun                                 
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | David L. Calhoun                                     
|                        |  |  |  | Chairman, Executive Board and Chief Executive Officer



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                        |  |  |  | /s/ Brian J. West      
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  | Brian J. West          
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Nielsen Company B.V. and will be retained by The
Nielsen Company B.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States Heating Oil Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of
United States Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby
certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:




(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.







Date:
      November 15, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Nicholas D. GerberName:
              Nicholas
      D. GerberTitle:
              President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                General
      Partner of United States Heating Oil Fund,
LP
Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 14 - 205 Date: April 14, 2014

United States

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Family Member Audit

Purpose 

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will 

be conducting an audit of family members covered under the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

(FEHB) Program, and to advise you of your role and responsibilities during the audit. The audit 

will examine a sample of FEHB Self and Family enrollments.

Background 

Under current FEHB procedures, both agencies and the FEHB carriers have certain 

responsibilities for family member eligibility determinations. We are aware that there may be 

inconsistencies in the family member verification process at the time of original enrollment, 

change of enrollment, or during the enrollee’s coverage period. 

The FEHB Program provides approximately 23 billion dollars in benefits annually for family 

members covered under Self and Family enrollments. Health insurance industry standards 

indicate that up to 10% of family members are ineligible for coverage. If this is also determined 

to be true for the FEHB Program, we will carefully analyze the findings, impacts and appropriate 

corrective actions to be taken. 

The audit, and follow-up activities, will allow OPM to determine the extent of ineligible family 

members and the financial impact on the FEHB Program. We hope to understand the scope of 

any potential problem in order to determine if changes are needed in the current policies and 

procedures utilized by agencies and retirement systems as well as FEHB carriers when verifying 

family member eligibility. 

Your Role 

Agencies and retirement systems will be responsible for providing enrollee addresses in the 

event that the addresses OPM obtains from the carriers are incorrect and, if needed, providing 

necessary documentation for verifying family member eligibility. 

 
Conclusion 

We will provide more information on your responsibilities as it becomes available. 

Sincerely,

John O’Brien 

Director 

Healthcare and Insurance 

2
**EXHIBIT31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Steve Domm, certify that:

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Millennium Ethanol, LLC;

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)            designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)           evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)            disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5.             Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board ofDirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)            allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

b)           anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting. 
|        |   |                       |
|--------|--------|----------------------------|
|   | By:    | /s/ Steve Domm             |
|   |   | Steve Domm                 |
|   |   | *Chief  Executive Officer* |

Date: August 14, 2007

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.1
 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (1)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 IMH SECURED LOAN FUND, LLCBy:
    
    Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc.Its:
    
    ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ Shane Albers

Shane AlbersChief Executive OfficerBy:
    
    /s/ Steven DarakSteven DarakChief Financial OfficerDated:
    
    August 14, 2008
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D20-1527

_____________________________

JIMMY STEPHENS,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF 

CORRECTIONS,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

September 22, 2021

PER CURIAM.

The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the 

merits. See Topps v. State, 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) 

(explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that 

“clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the 

merits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant 

from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or 

collateral estoppel”).

LEWIS, MAKAR, and BILBREY, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jimmy Stephens, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

MARLA YOUNG and SONNY STEEL,

Appellants,

v.

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ROAD RANGERS OF 

BROWARD, INC., SUNSHINE TOWING AT BROWARD, INC., and 

AECOM TECHNICAL SERVICES, INC.,

Appellees.

No. 4D17-2409

[November 8, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; John Joseph Murphy, III, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 

2013CA012572CA and 2015002456CA(08).

Roy D. Wasson of Wasson & Associates, Chartered, Miami, and Andrew 

Winston and Bradley Winston of The Winston Law Firm, Fort Lauderdale, 

for appellants Marla Young and Sonny Steel.

Ralph L. McGrath, Jr. and Cameron L. McGrath of McGrath Law Group, 

Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Florida Department of Transportation.

Robert I. Buchsbaum of Kramer, Green, Zuckerman, Greene & 

Buchsbaum, P.A., Hollywood, and John J. Wilke of The Law Office of John 

J. Wilke, P.A., Boca Raton, for appellees Road Rangers of Broward, Inc., 

and Sunshine Towing at Broward, Inc.

Suzanne Y. Labrit and Timothy D. Woodward of Shutts & Bowen, LLP, 

Tampa, and Amy M. Wessel of Shutts & Bowen, LLP, Fort Lauderdale, for 

appellee Aecom Technical Services, Inc.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, LEVINE and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *
2

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3438 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3438

To amend title 5, United States Code, to postpone the effective date of 
               high-impact rules pending judicial review.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 2015

  Mr. Marino (for himself and Mr. Goodlatte) introduced the following 
       bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to postpone the effective date of 
               high-impact rules pending judicial review.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Require Evaluation before 
Implementing Executive Wishlists Act of 2015'' or as the ``REVIEW Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. RELIEF PENDING REVIEW.

    Section 705 of title 5, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``When'' and inserting the following:
    ``(a) In General.--When''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(b) High-Impact Rules.--
            ``(1) Definitions.--In this subsection--
                    ``(A) the term `Administrator' means the 
                Administrator of the Office of Information and 
                Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and 
                Budget; and
                    ``(B) the term `high-impact rule' means any rule 
                that the Administrator determines may impose an annual 
                cost on the economy of not less than $1,000,000,000.
            ``(2) Relief.--
                    ``(A) In general.--Except as provided in 
                subparagraph (B), an agency shall postpone the 
                effective date of a high-impact rule of the agency 
                pending judicial review.
                    ``(B) Failure to timely seek judicial review.--
                Notwithstanding section 553(d), if no person seeks 
                judicial review of a high-impact rule during the 60-day 
                period beginning on the date on which the high-impact 
                rule is published in the Federal Register, the high-
                impact rule shall take effect on the date that is 60 
                days after the date on which the high-impact rule is 
                published.''.
                                 <all>
```
**AD Economic Evaluation**

Docket No. FAA - 2011 - 1113 Directorate ID: 2009 - SW - 53 - AD Helicopter Model: Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S - 92A Helicopters Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 44 Helicopte rs in the US Registry. Reason : The actions specified by this proposed AD are intended to detect mislocated blade wire mesh and to prevent spar delamination, loss of the blade tip cap during a lightning strike, blade imbalance, loss of a blade, and subseque nt loss of control of the helicopter. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $180,000 (replacement per blade) $13,000 (repair per blade) Labor per Helicopter ( 4 x $ 8 5 /work- hour s for inspection) (1 x $85/work
- hour for repair) $ 340 $85 Other (Explain) Total C ost per Helicopter $ 13,425 (repair) $180,340 ( replacement) Total US Fleet Cost $ 3,219,000 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD sign ificant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer: Nicholas Faust