# 7I—D-143

0 

# +► ,

~

# ► 

# Pine Hall Brick 

# L

,I B V I 

# ~

~ o



### Mr. William Neuffer Emission Standards Division ( MD-13 7-16-98 

### U. S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711

Dear Mr. Neuffer: This letter is in response to your letter dated June 30, 1998 requesting copies of two stack test reports from Pine Hall Brick Co., Inc. in Madison, N. C., one covering an experimental limestone addition test to our brick body in an effort to determine the effects on Hydrogen Fluoride emissions , and one covering our new fast fire kiln. It is understood that this request is made as part of an information gathering process to support the development of a maximum achievable control technology standard for the clay products manufacturing industry. The two stack tests requested are part of two separate reports conducted by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. Project No. 046-95-104 was conducted in June of 1995 and covered two conditions at our Plant #4 site which is a conventional tunnel kiln operation fired with natural gas. The first test was run on June 8, 1995 when an experimental brick body containing a 2% limestone addition was in process. The second test was run on June 9, 1995 with the nonmal red brick body in process. It should be noted that Pine Hall Brick is in the face brick business . The brick made with the limestone addition were discolored and CQ[ILR NOZ be sold in the face brick market. The addition of limestone during the production of marketable face brick was therefore NOT FEASIBLE 

### and no further tests were conducted. Project No. 046-97-191 was conducted in March of 1998 at our LOW PROFILE FAST FIRE PAYER PLANT which is also fired with natural gas. Two different brick paver bodies were tested in this project. The first test was run on a Pink Body mix which was run through the kiln at a 28 car per day push rate. The second was run on the standard Red Body mix which was fired at a push rate of 34 cars per day. TT SHOULD BE NOTED TgAT TffiS PLA_NT IS ONE OF THRF.E SUCH DESIGNED PI-ANTS IN THF WORLD AND IS NOT CONSMERIED A TYPIC i. OR FF.ASIBL.E DESICN 

### FOR Ai.i. BRi

_CK PL.ANT O E_R_A_TIONS.

2701 Shorefair Drive, P.O. Box 11044 Winston-Salem, NC 27116-1044 Tel. (910) 721-7500 Fax. (910) 725-3940

~

### To help you understand my concerns completely, I want to point out that the product

requirements for paving brick and facing brick are quite different. Paving brick specifications are given in ASTM C-902 and C-1272 where strength and durability are of primary concern. Facing brick meet other property requirements, as given in ASTM C-216 and per customer demands, which have not produced by "fast firing". Therefore , "fast firing " can not be considered as available for the production of facing brick at the present time.. Serious economic damage would result if requirements on firing rate were imposed on facing biick manufacturers like Pine HaU. The test repotts are enclosed as requested. Care should be taken in the use of and interpretation of these results since they represent special conditions that are not typical in the brick industry. They should not be used in the process of setting industry limits or requirements. We would be more than happy to discuss these results with you at your convenience.

Sincerely,

, 

### Harold B. Newman Manager of Technical Services Ceramic Engineer

### Stationary Source Sampling Report Pine Hall Brick Company Brick Kiln Exhaust - Plant No Madison, North Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-97-191 March 1998

### Stationary Source Sampling Report Pine Hall Brick Company Brick Kiln Exhaust - Plant No. 5 Madison, Nort.h Carolina Trigon Project No. 046-97-191 Mazch 1998

Z-/

# STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT
FOR
PINE HALL BRICK COIVIPANY MADISON, NORTH CAROLINA

Brick Kiln Exhaust - Plant No: 5 

## ~

I

~

t



### Performed by: Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. Environmental, Health & Safety Division 6200 Harris Technology Blvd. Charlotte, North Carolina 28269

704/598-1049 ; 

### Trigon Project No. 046-97-191 ;

, 

### March 1998 ~ 

# t 5 i!

~
a ~ 

### REPORT CERTIFICATION
This report, all testing details, and the final results have been performed under the supervision and reviewed by the persons named below.

Date W 

### Si

~ 

### i

i
~ 

### I Robert F. Callahan Project Manager Environmental, Health & Safety Division Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc.

Date /YIaj Zs 

### ~ I 

### ~ '98' S . i

.~ , 

### Pau1 R. Jenkins, Jr. Quality Assurance Manager Environmental, Health & Safety Division Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc.

Date 1~ 

### Nv"' ~ ~~' f'~`~~ 

### Si
/ 

### J.A. "Tony" Blanton Stack Testing Department Manager Environmental, Health & Safety Division Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc.



### ii

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1 1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................:...1 

### 1.2 Outline of Test Program ...............................................................................................1 1.3 Test Participants ..............................:.............................................................................2
2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................3 2.1 Discussion ..................................

. ................................................................................... . ~ 

### Figure 1- Process Air Flow Schematic ........................................................................4
3.0 SAIVIPLING METHODS .......................................................................................................5 3.1 Sampling Strategy .........................................................................................................5 3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures ...........................................................................5 3.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points andCyclonic Flow Deterniination ...............................................................5 3.2.z Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination ...................6 3.2.3 Dry Molecular Weight Determination .........................................................7 3.2.4 Moisture Determination ................................................................................8 3.2.5 Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling and Analysis ........9 3.2.6 Sampling Ports and Points ..........................................................................10 Location of Sampling Ports and Points Figure 2- Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant ............................................... l l
3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control .....................................................................12
4 .0 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................13 

### 4 

### .1 Summary of Results ...................................................................................................13 4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results

~ 

### ............................ ~ 

### Summary of Results Table 1- Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) .........................................14 Table 2- Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) ..........................................15
5.0 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................... A. Summary of Results and E.cample Calculations B. Field Data Sheets C. Laboratory Data D. Production Documentation E. Calibration Data .............16



# ~

iii 

# r7l'

~~ 

# I

### 1.0 INTRODUCTION This section describes the purpose, a brief outline including the sampling and analytical strategy, and the personnel involved in the test program.

1.1 Purpose The purpose of this sampling project was to detennine concentrations, and emission rates of hydrogen fluoride, and hydrogen chloride from two product lines. The two products tested were both paver bricks. The first was a"pink paver" whose raw ingredients were white kaolin and red shale ; the second was a"red paver" whose raw ingredient was predominately red shale. Both products were tested on the Brick Kiln Exhaust of the No. 5 Plant located at the Pine Hall Brick ~

:! 

### Company in Madison, North Carolina. The results of the sampling and the documentation ; I provided in this report will be used for emission inventory putposes.

1.2 Outline of Test Program ~ 

### Stationary source sampling was performed March 3 and 6, 1998 by the Environmental, Health & Safety Division of Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. at the Pine Hall Brick Company's facility in Madison, North Carolina. Three 1-hour sampling runs were conducted on each product line at the exhaust of the Brick Kiln at the No. 5 Plant. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Methods 1 through 4, and 26A were used for the determination of hydrogen fluoride, f and hydrogen chloride. All sampling and analytical procedures used were those established by the US EPA in standard reference test methods and appropriate state-of-the-art analytical procedures. T'he test runs were conducted during normal operating conditions. r



# ~ 

# a

### 13 Test Participants A list of the project participants, titles, affliation and telephone numbers can be found below.

Participant Title Affiliation Contact Robert F. Callahan Project Manager Trigon Engineering Telephone: (704) 598-1049 Consultants, Inc. Facsimile: (704) 598-1050 John D. Archer Senior Environmental Trigon Engineering Scientist Consultants, Inc. Joseph P. Konzelmann Environmental Trigon Engineering Scientist Consultants, Inc. Preston McMillan Plant Manager Pine Hall Brick Telephone: (336) 427-2036 Company Facsimile: (336) 548-1837 Harold Newman Facility Engineer Pine Hall Brick Telephone: (336) 548-6007 Company Facsimile: (336) 548-1837

~ i

I! 

### 2 I I f 

# ~~ ~`:~

;



### 2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION This section contains a brief description of a brick firing process, the type and amount of materials handled, and a typical process air flow schematic.

2.1 Discussion The Pine Hall Brick Company, Madison, North Carolina manufactures specialty brick products. Some of the raw materials include; white kaolin and red shale. After the bricks are formed, they are loaded on to cars (rail cars) for transport into and through the kiln, where the final curing process takes place. Process emission gases from the kiln are exhausted through a 42-inch I.D. stack and discharged directly to atmosphere. Figure 1 details the process air flow schematic from this process.
production data during sampling was compiled by Pine Hall Brick personnel and is presented in , %ppendiY D. All sampling was performed during material processing. During the first product line (pink pavers), Pine Hall Brick set the production rate (push rate) at 28 cars per day, 2,430 bricks per car, with a fired weight of 5.03 pounds per brick (fired-ware), this resulted in an hourly rate of 7.13 tons. During the second product line (red pavers), the push rate was set at 34 cars per day, 2,430 bricks per car, with a 5.40 pounds fired-ware per brick weight, this resulted in an production rate of 9.29 tons/hr. There were no unusual process conditions noted during the sampling.

3 

### IF- AFAILOR/Z

## Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant
Atmosphere 

# T f—Sampling Location Stack



# T

I.D. Fan



# T

Brick Kiln 

# I

Figure 1 Process Air Flow Schematic

4

### 3.0 SAMPLING METHODS This section describes the sampling strategy, sampling and analytical methods, and quality assurance/quality control procedures implemented during this project.

3.1 Sampling Strategy The sampling and analytical procedures used during this test program were those established by the US EPA. Sampling runs were conducted in triplicate to validate the sampling. Tests were conducted during normal operating conditions. There were no unusual conditions noted during the sampling.

3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures The US EPA methods used in this sampling program were Method 1 for the location of sampling

, 

### orts and points, and determination of cyclonic flow, Method 2 for volumetric flow rate determination, Method 3 for the determination of dry molecular weight of the stack gas, and Method 4 for the determination of moisture in the stack gas. Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride concentrations and emission rates were determined using Method 26A. Sampling and analysis synopsis is discussed briefly in the following subsection. These test methods are available in the Code of Federal Regulations Volume 40, Part 60 or by request from Trigon.
3.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow Determination The Brick Kiln E.rhaust sampling locations were prepared according to the criteria in Method 1. The duct diameters upstream and downstream ftom the sampling ports were deternnined prior to sampling. The number of traverse points were chosen with respect to sampling port location. The amount of cyclonic flow was determined according to the criteria detailed in Method 1.

E

### 3.2.2 Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination Method 2 is used for determining the average gas velocity in a stack from measurements of gas density and the average velocity head with a Type S(Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This method is applicable for quantifying gas flows which meet the criteria of Method 1. Method 2 cannot be used for direct measurement of gas streams which exhibit cyclonic flow conditions as determined by Method 1, Section 2.4.
In principle measurements of velocity head and temperature are performed at the traverse points specified by Method 1. A properly scaled differential pressure gauge was selected for the range of Op values encountered during the traverse. A 0- 10 inches of water inclined manometer was used as the differential pressure gauge.
D4.,ng this project, the sampling locations met all of the criteria detailed in Method 1. Gas stream density was determined by Method 3. Moisture detennination was performed by Method 4. The principal components of the gas velocity measurement system were sequentially: * A calibrated stainless steel Type S pitot tube and Type K thermocouple; * Leak-free interface tubing between pitot tube and differential pressure gauge; * A 0 to 10 inch inclined manometer and; * An NIST traceable pyrometer. The apparatus was set-up according to manufacturer and reference method recommendations. Pretest and posttest leak checks were conducted using procedures outlined in Method 2, Section 3.1. Velocity head and temperature measurements were performed at the traverse points specified by Method 1. The atmospheric and static pressure of the stack was also detennined for each set of velocity head readings. The volumetric flow rate calculations used were those specified in Method 2, Section 5. A more comprehensive e.cplanation of the reference method is detailed in the Quality A-qurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA/600/R-94/038c).



### R,

~ 

### 2:

### 3.23 Dry Molecular Weight Determination: Method 3 is applicable for determining carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations and dry molecular weight of a sample from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel combustion process. This method may also be applicable to other processes where it has been determined that compounds other than carbon dioxide, oxygen, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen are not present in concentrations sufficient to affect the results.
In principle, a gas sample is withdrawn from an emission source by single-point, grab sampling; single-point, integrated sampling; or multi-point, integrated sampling. The collected sample is then analyzed for percent carbon dioxide, percent oxygen, and if necessary, for percent carbon monoxide. For dry molecular weight determination, either an Orsat or Fyrite analyzer may be used for the analysis.
During this project, the gaseous components were collected using a Method 3 sampling system following the analytical procedures outlined in the reference method. The principal components of the sampling system were sequentially: * A stainless steel probe; * A one-way squeeze bulb, to transport the sample to the Tedlar bag; * A saturator tube to remove particulate matter and excess moisture and; * A leak-free Tedlar bag equipped with a double-end shut-off quick connect.
The analysis was perfonned with a Max 5 and a Fyrite type combustion gas analyzer within 8 hours of sample collection. The dry molecular weight was calculated using Equation 34, Section 7 of Method 3. The analyzer was maintained and operated according to the instructions recommended by the manufacturer and in accordance with Method 3 criteria. The analyzer and all connections were tight and leak-free. The oxygen analyzer was validated by analyzing a sample of ambient air 3n. Ls confirmed at 21.0%. ~ L L f C '

7

### 3.2:4 Moisture Determination Method 4 involves the determination of stack gas moisture. Stack gas moisture must be measured when the flue gas flow rate or a pollutant gas concentration is determined. The moisture content is used to correct the emission concentration or mass emission rate to a dry basis. EPA Method 4, Section 3.3 of the EPA's Qualiry Assurance Handbook, Volume III, EPA-600/04-77-027b is used to measure stack gas moisture content. Section 13 of the Quality Assurance Handbook, Volume III, provides detailed information on the application of Method 4.
Preliminary flue gas moisture determinations were conducted on the day preceding the test date. The preliminary flue gas moisture content (for purposes of setting the isokinetic flow rate) was determined using the wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers and partial pressure, vapor and saturated vapor pressure equations. This technique is described in Method 4 and is summarized below: * Moisten the wet bulb thermometer wick with deionized water; * Insert both thermometers into the flue gas stream and monitor the wet bulb temperature; * When the wet bulb temperature has stabilized, record both the wet bulb and dry bulb thennometer temperatures; * Calculate the flue gas moisture content (PMV) using the equations below.

SVP = Vapor Pressure of Water at Saturation, inches of Mercury SVP = l Ox•"(6.6911 -(3144/(Wet Bulb + 390.86)))

PMV = Percent Moisture by Volume PMV =(SVP -(0.000367(P b xDry Bulb - Wet Bulbx 1+((Wet Bulb - 32)/1671))))/(P b 

### ,) x 100

P w ,, = Absolute Pressure of Stack Gas
P ab 

## , = ( Barometric Pressure + (Static Pressure/ 13.6))


### `IbP flue gas moisture content used in emission rate calculations was obtained in conjunction with tht sokinetic sampling systems.
8 

## IP`-ffA1Wi9 

# _ —

### The moisture content for emission rate calculations was determined in conjunction with the Method 26A isokinetic sampling train. The reference method involves the withdrawal of gaseous and particulate pollutants from the emission source at an isokinetic rate using a Method 26A sampling system. The sampling and analytical procedure for reference Method 4 will be discussed in detail in Section 3.2.5 with the isokinetic sampling procedures.

3.2.5 Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling and Analysis Testing for hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride was performed according to EPA Method 26A. Gaseous and particulate pollutants were withdrawn isokinetically from the emission source and collected in a multi component sampling train. 'In principle, particulate matter includes any material that was condensed at or above the filtration temperature of approximately 250 degrees fahrenheit and was collected on a quartz filter. The gaseous components were then bubbled tt. jh a measured volume of 0.1 N sulfuric acid and 0.1 N sodium hydroxide to determine hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and moisture content of the emission source. The principal components of the sampling system were sequentially: * A borosilicate glass sample nozzle and probe liner; * A heated (248°F t25°F) probe and filter assembly with quartz filter; * An impinger train consisting of four sequential impingers. Impingers one and two containing 100 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sulfuric acid (0.1N H 2 SO 4 ). Impinger three contained 100 ml of dilute sodium hydroxide (O.1N NaOH) followed by an impinger containing 200 grams of silica gel; and * A metering system capable of maintaining an isokinetic sampling rate and accurately detemuning the sample volume according to those specifications in APTD-0581. Sample clean up began immediately after each test run. Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride 

# ~ was collected in the 0.1N sulfuric acid solution in impingers one and two. T'he liquid in these i 

### impingers was measured to the nearest milliliter. The collected sample was placed in a glass sto- - container along with the deionized water rinse of impingers one and two and connecting 

### ~ ;lassware. The container was sealed and the liquid level was marked. The O.1N sodium hydroside ! ~ 9 ~ 

# 1 p- FAI ~i ~

### solution in impinger three was used as a scrubber to protect the sampling console. The liquid in tkus impinger was measured to detennine the moisture content and later discarded. The hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride sample container was sealed and the liquid level marked. The samples were then shipped to Enthalpy Analytical, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina with chain of custody documentation where they were analyzed by ion chromatography. The moisture collected by the silica gel in the fourth impinger was determined to the nearest 0.1 gram. All collected condensate measurements were recorded on the moisture determination and sample analysis data recovery form. The particulate matter sample was also discarded. 3.2.6 . Sampling Ports and Points The dimensions of the sampling sites and the location of the sampling ports and points are detailed ~ 

### in Figure 2. Method 1 sampling criteria was maintained in each instance. The

~ 

### stack cross section was divided into the 24 equal areas as detailed in Method 1. The ports were labeled A and B. S. :ing was performed at 24 points for 2.5 minutes each, resulting in a total test time of 60 =, minutes. ~ 4



### 10 E

## M

.



## 0 SECTION K—K 

## -2.0"

)OF 

## Brick Kiln Ezhaust - No. 5 Plant

;Vot to Scale 

## Figure 2

Location of Sampling Ports and Points

11

~

### 3:3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc., has established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) guidelines for providing the highest quality sampling and analytical data from source tests. These QA/QC procedures were implemented to ensure the acceptability and reliability of the data generated.
In summary, a high degree of data quality was maintained throughout this project. All instrumentation leak checks and QA criteria were met. Quality control procedures for Method 26A were followed. Field data and final data reduction results were entered into Trigon's Air Quality Data System by an environmental scientist, independently audited by the Project Manager, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Manager for verification of data. A$er QC review by the QA Manager, the Department Manager verified the final report for completeness and reasonableness of da' The report was returned to the Project Manager for review and preparation of the final draft. The report requires the signature of the Project Manager, QA Manager, and the Department Lvlanager before release to the client. Data and final reports are archived in a secured area for a

~ 

### minimum period of three years.
I'rigon's field and laboratory test equipment has been maintained and calibrated in accordance with juality assurance procedures established by the US EPA in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Nir Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III. Equipment calibrations including pre-test and )ost-test calibration data are presented in Appendix E.



## 12

### 4.0 RESIJLTS This section presents the hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen chloride (HC1) sampling results. Tabular results are also provided to present data from individual sampling runs collected during this project. Detailed sampling results and example calculations for the test program can be found in Appendix A. Field data sheets are presented in Appendix B.

4.1 Summary of Results The tables below are a synopsis of the HF and HC1 sampling conducted on both product lines at the Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant.

HF and HCl Sampling Results

- 

### Pink Paver Bricks HF HCl 'centration, gr/dscf 0.037 0.009 Emission Rate, lb/hr 3.68 0.856 Emission Rate, lb/ton fired-ware 0.52 0.12

HF and HCl Sampling Results

- 

### Red Paver Bricks HF HCl Concentration, gr/dscf 0.028 0.007 Emission Rate, lb/hr 2.70 0.663 Emission Rate, lb/ton fired-ware 0.29 0.07

4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results Table 1 present the data from individual sampling runs on the pink paver brick product line on the exhaust of the Brick Kiln at No. 5 plant. The red paver brick individual sampling runs from the Brick Kiln Exhaust at No. 5 plant are presented in Table 2. Included in these tables are gas velociry ar. :)lumetric flow rates, exhaust gas temperatures, and pollutant concentrations, and emission
rates ;



### 13

### TABLE 1 Summary of Results, Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling - Pink Paver Bricks Brrick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant 

# 1,4

un Number ate un Duration, Minutes ample Time, 24-hour clock

~ 

### verage Stack Temperature, °F ;tack Gas Velocity, feet/second )tack Gas Flow Rate, dry standazd cubic feet/minute*(dscfin) 'tack Gas Flow Rate, ac ' cubic feet/minute(acfrn) 'roduction Rate, tons/hr (fired-ware) 4ydrogen Chloride: Catch, mg Concentration, gr/dscf Emission Rate, lbs/hr Emission Rate, lbs/ton Hydrogen Fluoride: Catch, mg Concentration, gr/dscf Emission Rate, lbs/hr Emission Rate, lbs/ton * 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg 1 2 3 Avg. 03/03/98 03/03/98 03/03/98 

### 60 60 60 0832-0936 0953-1057 1111-1215 543.5 546.9 541:6 544.0 41.9 45.3 43.6 43.6 

### 11302 12191 11785 11759

24211 26158 25159 25176

7.13 7.13 7.13 7.13

21.513 23.119 22.401 22.344 0.0086 0.0084 0.0085 0.0085 0.829 0.880 0.859 0.856 0.116 0.123 0.120 0.120

93.940 106.74 87.814 96.165 0.037 0.039 0.033 0.037 3.62 4.06 3.37 3.68 0.508 0.569 0.473 0.517 z

~



### 14a b

~ 3 a
~


### =

: "a 

# ~

_ a x 

# ~ TABLE 2 Summary of Results, Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling - Red Paver Bricks Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg. Date 03/06/98 03/06/98 03/06/98 

### Run Duration, Minutes 60 60 60 Sample Time, 24-hour clock 0815-0917 0948-1051 1102-1205 Average Stack Temperature, °F 474.0 483.6 480.0 479.2 Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.7 40.3 39.8 39.3 Stack Gas Flow Rate, 10980 11652 11562 11398 dry standard cubic feet/minute*(dscfrn) Stark Gas Flow Rate, 21756 23263 22999 22673

~ 

### i1 cubic feet/minute(acfm) Production Rate, tons/hr (fired-ware) 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 Hydrogen Chloride: Catch, mg 15.109 16.797 18.455 16.787 Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0063 0.0066 0.0073 0.0068 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.598 0.664 0.728 0.663 Emission Rate, lbs/ton 0.064 0.071 0.078 0.071 Hydrogen Fluoride: Catch, mg 61.502 64.459 79.450 68.470 

### Concentration, gr/dscf 0.026 0.026 0.032 0.028 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 2.43 2.55 3.13 2.70 Emission Rate, lbs/ton 0.262 0.274 0.337 0.291
* 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg



### 15 ' 

## ~:.-- _>l-.= ~~ f.. F>' \ p' :. _.lroar ~ , . .

_ ~ --•+
~ r.: N1Q-+•h .-

~ .v.-w• a ..~~ r ic•c

- '•i

~ +~ ~ 

### -

~ 

### •.• •

~ ~ 

### ' i, t

~ 

### •r. r

~ 

### c

.~ 

### '" ._.ti. t • • . F , r ii •. . .' •

.

- w~~~ 

### "- j

~ ~ - a`

. — 

### `" - -

~ 

### _'_ .

. ~-~~ 

### ,. ,•`\ •, >1 :.` '.,. '' '

. a~ 

### .w _ 't ' _ a

~ 

### i.

~ 

### .'

~ 

### " ` tr..i3' ~ ..
,► ~i~~. ~::w~ 

### S..

~~ ir.y ~. t

~ a:

~ 

### ... ~ 

### :...

~ ~ 

### ... _ . y r.

5.0 APPENDICES This section contains detailed supportive documentation that encompasses all aspects of the emission test program. Its contents serve as the foundation for the test report. The emission test report presents a summary of the information gathered during the sampling activities. The information contained in the appendices is necessary to facilitate the review of the emission test report and determine whether proper procedures were used to accomplish the test plan objectives.
Defensible data and the subsequent pollutant concentrations and emission rates is one of the

, primary objectives of any emission test program. To this end, a11 results, example calculations,

field data sheets, sample recovery, laboratory results, chain of custody documentation, and 

# ~ equipment calibrations have been provided to support these objectives.

1L '

### APPEYDLX A

SUMMARY OF RESULTS A

~ 

### YD EXAMPLE CAi,CIJI,ATIONS

A- 1

### SUMMA.RY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) Run Number 1 2 3 Date: 03/03/98 03/03/98 03/03/98 @ 

### Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 P bv Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.19 29.12 29.11 

### P e Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.018 -0.018 -0.018 P S Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.172 29.102 29.092 V M Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 38.67 43.10 41.66 AH Avg. Delta H, in. H 2 0 1.39 1.70 1.57 

### T, m Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 56.3 66.4 69.6
V5'M 

### Volume Sampled at St,and. Cond., cu. ft. 3 8. 7 42.3 40.6 V c 

### Volume of Water Collected, ml 81.3 84.7 81.2 V Wc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 3.83 3.99 3.82 B WS Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.090 0.086 0.086 P M ,, Percent Moisture in Stack 9.0 8.6 8.6

MFD 

### Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.910 0.914 0.914 %O Z Percent Oxygen, Dry 16.2 15.9 16.0 %CO 2 Percent Carbon Dioxide, Dry 2.5 3.0 2.5 %CO Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.0 0.0 0.0 M, Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.047 29.115 2 9. 03 9 M S Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/Ib mol 28.053 28.156 28.088 Cp Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 APS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.527 0.569 0.548 T S Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 543.5 546.9 541.6 V S Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 41.9 4 5. 3 43.6 A Area Stack, ft = 9.62 9.62 9.62 Avg

29.14 -0.018 29.122 41.14 1.55 64.1 40.5 82.4 3.88 0.087 8.7 0.913 16.0 2.7 0.0 29.067 28.099 0.84 0.548 544.0
43.6 

### 9.62

A-2 ., 

# IP--'rAX 1411

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) Q so Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 11302 12191 11785 11759 Q A 

# I Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 24211 26158 25159 25176 ' Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 12420 13341 12896 12886



## ~ D. Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.311

A. Area of Nozzle, ft = 0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 I i Percent Isokinetic 104.2 105.4 104.7 104.8

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration and Emission Rate



## ~ m, Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 21.513 23.119 22.401 22.344



## ~ C s Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0086 0.0084 0.0085 0.0085

C. Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf 0.0086 0.0083 0.0083 0.0084 1 C Aw Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.829 0.880 0.859 0.856

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration and Emission Rate



## ~ m, Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 93.940 106.74 87.814 96.165



## ~ C s Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0 3 7 0.039 0.033 0.037

C. Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.037 0.038 0.032 0.036 C AW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 3.62 4.06 3. 3 7 3.68

A-3 

## ~~ ~

### SUiv1MARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) Eaample Calculations Run 1 

### Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg Ps = Pb az 

### + P g = 29.172 Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft.

17.647 * V m 

## * (P b „ + 

### QH / 13.6) V sm
_ --- ------ -----------------------_---_ = 38.7

T M + 460 Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF V,, c = 0.04709 * V c = 3.83 Moisture Content of Gas Stream

V wc B ws _ --- -------- = 0.090

V sm + uwc Percent Moisture in Stack

100 * V wc P M „ = _ ; 9.0

V s - ro + V wc Mole Fraction of Dry Gas

100 - P m ,, MFD _ --_ = 0.910

100 

### Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, 

### lb/lb mole M d = 0.44 * %CO z + 0.32 * %0 2 + 

### 0.28 * (100 - %CO 2 - % 

### O z ) = 29.047 Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole M S = IVI d * ( 

### I - B,n) 

### + 18.0 * B,,,, = 2 . ,) Avg. Stack Velociry, ft/sec (T S + 460) V S = 85.49 * C P * OPS * SQRT

---- 

### = 41.9 (Ps 

### * kQ Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM

1058.82* V S *A*P S *(1-B,,,,) Qsn = — -~---_--- = 11302

T S + 460 A-4

### SUMMA.RY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM Q,=V S *A*60= 24211 

### Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFVI Qsw = QsD * [1/(1-B, Xs )] _ 12420 

### Area of Nozzle, ft = A. = ((D. / 2)" =

* 114159)/144 = 0.00053 

### Percent Isokinetic

0.0945 * (T S + 460) * V sTD I = ----------- --------- _ 104.2

A * Vs * P s * (1

- 

### Bw,) * A, 

### Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf (At Standard Conditions) C s =0.0154*m s /V sro = 

### Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf (At Standard Conditions) C.=0.0154*m n /V,,= 0.0086 

### Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr (At Standard Conditions) C,,,, = 0.00857 * C S * Qso = 0.829 

### Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg
I

A-5 2 

### ~ / - . i

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers)

0



# I 2 03/06/98 

### 60 29.57 -0.018 29.552 38.22 1.38 54.4 38.9 85.4 4.02 0.094 9.4 0.906 16.0 

### 2.5 0.0 29.044 28.009 0.84 0.526 483.6 40.3 9.62 

### Run Number 1 Date: 03/06/98 0 Net Time of Test, minutes 60 Pb. Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.58 P g Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.018 P S Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.562 V M Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 35.63 OH Avg. Delta H, in. H 2 0 1.22 T M Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 49.1 V Sm Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 36.6 V c Volume of Water Collected, ml 83.0 V Wc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 3.91 B ws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.096 P,, t ,, Percent Moisture in Stack 9.6 MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.904 %0 2 Percent Oxygen, Dry 15.6 %CO 2 Percent Carbon Dioxide, Dry 2.9 %CO Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.0 M d Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.093 M S Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mol 28.024 Cp Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 APS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.494 T S Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 474.0 V S Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 37.7 A Area Stack, ft = 9.62
A-6 3 Avg 03/06/98 --- 60 --- 29.55 29.57 -0.018 -0.018 29.532 29.548 38.41 37.42 1.36 1.32 59.6 54.4 38.7 38.1 84.5 84.3 3.98 3.97 0.093 0.094 9.3 9.4 0.907 0.906 15.8 15.8 

### 2.9 2.8 0.0 0.0 29.092 29.076 28.058 28.030 0.84 0.84 0.521 0.514 480.0 479.2 39.8 39.3 9.62 9.62

- ~ 

### 2

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hyd.rogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) Q s p Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 10980 Q,, Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 21756 Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 12151 D. Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 A. Area of Noale, fe 0.00053 I ,



### Percent Isokinetic 101.5 Hydrogen Chloride Concentration and Emission Rate M. Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 15.109 C, Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0063 C. Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf 0.0065 C AW Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.598 Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration and Emission Rate
m, Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 61.502 C, Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.026 C. Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.027 C AW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 2.43 11652 11562 11398 23263 22999 22673 12857 12751 12586 

### 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 101.5 101.7 101.6

16.797 18.455 16.787 0.0066 0.0073 0.0068 0.0068 0.0074 0.0069 0.664 0.728 0.663

64.459 79.450 68.470 0.026 0.032 0.028 0.026 0.032 0.028 2.55 3.13 2.70



### A-7 ; 

### .~~

### SLTMMARY OF RESUL,TS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln E,chaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) Example Calculations Run 1 Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg Ps = Pbar + P s = 29.562 Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft.

17.647 * V,,, * (P b . + [1H / 13.6) V S

. M

_ 36.6



### T M + 460 Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF V wc = 0.04709 * V c = 3.91 

### Moisture Content of Gas Stream

V wc B„ s _ - = 0.096



### V s
- M 

### + V wc 

### Percent Moisture in Stack

100 * V wc P mti , = ---- = 9.6

VsTn + Vwc 

### Mole Fraction of Dry Gas

100 - P m v 

### MFD _ ----------- = 0.904

100 

### Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole NI d = 0.44 * %CO 2 + 0. 3 2 * %0 2 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO 2 - %02) = 29.093 

### Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole M s =M d *(1-B,„)+18.0*B„.= 28.024 

### Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec (T s + 460) V s = 85.49 * C P * OPS * SQRT = 37.7 

### (Ps * NQ 

### Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM

1058.82*V s *A*P s *(1-B,,,,) QsD = -- = 10980



### T s + 460 A-8 OR

~

### SliNINiARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Brick Kiln E.ahaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM Q A =V s *A*60= 21756 

### Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM Qsw = QsD * [ 1 /(1-B ws )] = 12151 

### Area of Nozzle, ft = A. = ((D n / 2)" 2 * 3.14159)/144 = 0.00053 

### Percent Isokinetic

0.0945 * (T s + 460) * V sm I = --- ---- ---- -- = 101.5



### 0*V S *P s *(1-B,.)*A, Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf (At Standard Conditions) C S = 0.0154 * m, / V sm = 0.006- 3 1 

### Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf (At Standard Conditions) C„ = 0.0154 * m, / V~, = 0.0065 

### Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr (At Standazd Conditions) C,, W = 0.00857 * C, * Q s p = 0.598 

### Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg



## A-9

~~.~

### APPEYDIX B

FIELD DATA SHEETS

B-1 

# ,C)'Stack Diarneter - 12 • 24 inches PelocXe to 0.50 iflcheS Stack Diameter > 24 inches Reloom to 1.00 inches


# m . - . 

## 7-

~ 

## EPA iVethod 

## I

Client 

### ?,Vcr 

## Determination of Sampling Porty and Points



# B A, c- 

## x 6. , -, o., a ) /

- Ciry/State A40450A/, 

### AICSampling Location 

### 8h4K C

- .rq* , ;Sr 

## - A,&. 3 AAA 11- Date 

## 3

- Z - 

## 98 

# r- A



# Y Dl=aft"CZ 

# -

63

"

SAMPLrNO ,10CA170M

K K

D[SMRBAYCZ


### Schematic ofSwqmUV LacndP"Sampling Location Dimensions

### 4 .40 From Far Wall to Outside of Port 

### 6. 2. 

## :5

Nipple Length 

### 3• Z.5"I Depth of Duct 1 

## 12. Width (Rectangular Duct)
Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE): 2 x LengEh.x Width 2( DE = Leno - Width +

Distance to Ports From Nearest Flow Disturbance: Upstream - A Downsweam - B Dimensions in Inches (03 

### 0V Duct Diameters Stack Area. in Square Feet CalculationsBy 

# 7; = cLocabon of Traverse Points in. CimmiarStacim

.............. .... ....... 4 6 a 10 12 1 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 2 25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 6.7 3 75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.8 4 93.3 70.4 32.3 216 17.7

85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0 6 95.6 90.6 65.8 35.6

5 .6 89.5 77.4 64.4

.. . ....... 75-0 9 ..... . . ..... 91.9 823 io . .. ...... 97-4 882 3.3 97 . 9

Location of Traverse Points in Rectangular Stacks 2 3 4 5 6 7 25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 75.0 50.0 37.5 50.0 25.0 21.4

62.5 41. 7 35.7 3 - ,.; '0.0 ;8.3 50.0

" . 0 75.0 64.3

..... . . ... 77F .... 9 1.7 79.6 92.9

Audited 

# OnA Z 1 7

31.3

68.8 813 73.3

### EP.4 Method Z

Determination of Stack Gas i%locity, [%lumetric Flow Rate and Cyclonic Flow
Client )Rn/sr Att Co . Sampling Lucati 

### p nec.A4 ic.d E Run Date .3l1 8 Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 

### 29. 00 Static Pressure. in. H

- )O



### j~~ —©. 25 Static Pressure. in. He — O. o/ D Stack Pressure. in. Hg L'O.'7Yl i Stack Dimensions. in.. diameteriside I City. State /7'4D/Je,o Operators AaC.. 

### XA Time 

### /'SOy Pitot Tube I.D. No. 

### ~ Date Calibrated 1" 3 • Pitot Tube Coefficient Leak Check. in. H

- )O <0. I Side?. in. 

### Field Data

- - — - -- - - Point Number - --- ---- ------ - -

. — - - - - _ -------- -- - --- - - D etermination --- -- 

## ~

©~~~~ ~~
{

~ r ~ ® J~ ~ ~ • ® ~ I I



### ~ • , 

### ~®~ , ' , + 

### ~



## ~ 

# ®®®

~ 

# ®

{

;

Stack Temperature. Dry. °F (i1) 

### /345 Stack Temperature. Wet °F (B) 9 0 Ditterence (A - B) 357 , Preliminarv Percent Moisture 

### s.

Comments

~~ bv~,~ l'' t — Da14 5 

# ~

## EPA Method 3 - Molecular TWeight DeterminatioR - Data Analysis

Client Name 

## PINE HA[t RR1eK C'o. Project Number 

## 046-91

- (9 1 aty/State 

## f1ADISoN, NC Sample Date 

## _01a319, Sampling Location 

### 8alCk kILN OfHAUn' _ A/e. 

### S PI.ANT Operator 

## RFC/jPK Sample Type 

### d Tedlar Bag 

### d Multipoint o Single Point Fuel Type 

### NATURAL GA S Analyaer Type Fvrite Serial # 

### 300•003 c,(Oxygen Cahbration Check Must Be 20.9 t 0.1% AnGart 

### TyPe Maa 5 Ser(GI # 

### 131642 Run # and/or Sample ID 

### RVN I Sampling Time (24 - Hour Qock) 083 1 

### ' o934

Gas: :.. "Re iicate I' Re lieate Z'' Re licate3' ;:.:.. . Average

Pereent Multfplier

;.:. Moleeular Weight

Dry ib/ib mo[ ~ . Actval Net: Actual' Net Actual Net ' 

### coi: 2.5 2.5 L. S 2. S 1.5 2.5 2.7 I. to0 16.2 I4.2 IG.I 16.1 I4.2 14.2 16 

## .11 N=:' ''10

~ 

## ' g L 3 :: ioo: S I. y ioo :: 81.3 81. 33 o:2s:: : 22.172

Run # and/or Sample ID 

## R u N 2 Total 23.0 y4

Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) 

### 0953 

## - (OS7

. Re licate 1 :



### ': : Re licate 2."'

. Re Ifcare 3 .:



### . ~ 

### 4verage

. 

### Multipiier .. 1~ 

### !Iolecvlar We4ht Acttial .:, 

### Afec . 

### Actusi °'1'4et Actual Net Percent ":Dry li

~ 

### lIh molr ` 

### co ~ 

### ; 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 

## o:aa ; 1.320

IS.E 1 S.9 15.9 I S.9 IS.9 15.87 Nz : '> 100 o:2s : 22. ~ 

### 16 Total 29. 1 1 y

Run # and/or Sample ID 

## Rw 3. Sampling Time (24 - Hour Qock) 

## I I I I• 1215

Re lieate 2` 

## . .. - Re Itcate 3' 

## . ; Average Maitipiler ~ 

## . Gas ; Re licate I ' ketusi` :` Ne

~ 

### . ActUai Net Actual NeE Pereent , : ; Dr ~ 

### Ib1 

### : cai>: 

## 2.5 2. S 

## 2.9 2.5 2. S 2. 5 

### ' 2. S .<»::::;:<<;:

~ 

### <:;::':::;: 1.10
>:>: I6. 0 

### (b.o 1L.o 16.0 I5.9 15.9 1S.91 ':: Moieculaj b t



### 22 .
T~ 

### l

udited v! ~C~L Dat~ 

### 3 r ,Zo i 98 R_ 

### 4 

# z~ 

# F7 A 

# r

### EPA itifethod 26A - Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis

Client Name 'PI-/E ACc 8eicK Ca. Project Number 0T6

- f7-/9/ City/State 1- 1* 01 JmA/, . ✓ C. Sample Date 

### 3 - 3 -9g Sampling Location 3,ucK Z,u ✓ ~x~9~rr -n.b • S R 4 wrSamples Recovered By QFC Clean-Up Box Number S Recovery Date 3-3 -58 Chain of Custody: Date Received 3

- 3

- ~ P7 Received By PRZ Locked7 

### Equipment Documentation
Run Number Sam le ID Number 191 -o / 7/5/-0-t- 19/-03 Sam le Boz Number 1 1- / Probe Number

~ 3y

~ ' or- oeCe 

### Alnalysis of Moisture Recovery Rea ent Recoverv Container # 7/9/ -a/ J 7/1 , -OZ 7/ 9/ -d 3 Im in¢er Absorbing Solution o• t / MZ So o•/I1 W—S° D./.J o Descri tion of Rea ent 04,044 C CL4MRRea¢ent Level Marked7 ✓ e-11- Final Volume, ml 

### 2G 3 2 

### -7 2- Initial Volume ml Zoo 7.00 Zoo Net Condensed Volume, ml (e 3• 9 ^ 1 l• 0 72 •o Rcaizent Recoverv Contaitier # 7/1/ -o t '7i9/ -• z i91 _oj Im in er Absorbing Solution o. /n/ ^4zq O./, ✓ ' 60</ d, t, ✓ Aliv Descri tion of Rea ent 42.4 am'z

~ ' IMR CL&*A Rea ent Level Marked'? ✓ 161 ~ Final Volume ml 0 /474 too Initial Volume ml /oa i•o i o 0 Net Condensed Volume, ml /O. Silica Gel Recoverv Container # / L -3 Percent Silica Gel S ent 3 0 3 0 a Final Wei ht. g 1_a8. 3 2-09.7 20,2- Initial Wei ht. g 210-2 Zoo Zoo Net Absorbed Water. ¢ 

### 8 — 3 9 . L Total ReaQent Collected. Q 9/. 8 ~ 8/• Z 

### Sample Reeovery
Recoverv Container # 7/9/ -o / / S/-o L 7/S/ -03 Rinsin¢ Solution rrA- J. '
- m-_ ~~~• ~ Sam le Container Sealed? Li uid Levei Marked'.' 

### Reagent Blanks

Absorbing Blank Identification # ' 7 /9/

- O y Rinsine Blank Identirication # Absorbine Rea ent Blank "" Rinsing Rea ent Blank
~ Absorbina Blank Identification #

~ ' Rinsin¢ Blan k Identi tication # ~

~ tist Inu ! aLr .. . Aita Re

~ •ietiver lnitiaLs I

~ ~ 

# ~ 7~r

### ~

~



## ~



## , I

i 

## i " '7 8 

## 15, v Zl 

## -33- /7.S z3.0 

### 9 20 . o Z 

## .45 / o 2

. Z, 6' Zfi . Zq 

### 25'. 0

- 

### a iu /Z Z7, 2.9 .

- 33



### , 3o •a 3a 

### - si 

### 2 34• S 32. 2 co 

## 3 3S o s
. ~ 37~

~ 1•~ 3 0


## s 7 S 

## Wzcp 9 

## /o ,So .o y3.



## y'+

- 75 4~ 

### ..31 

### 12 59 S y7 `i

•o y9.12



## ~ 3a. (.`1 a.z it 1.4o /. 0.2$ I.Yd l 40 O. Z!, 1. 3D /- ,go o. Z,(, t . 36 

### o. Z4 l. zo r. iC oZ3 I./& l.Iv 0.t3 I.fo 

### 1,10 

## o.zZ 1.0Z 

## /.ID 6•2Z /.o$ /./o n 7_14 i if% 

### I.Iv 0.2 I•Jo rs- 7.3 d• 3H i. - 7 l, s 

### o.115 1.71 u-31 I.Sc 0.144 1 -zc



### 2 AZ"g 

### I `I•S 1 554 Z I 1 

### 4.0 559 2' 

## 1 4.0 ss

~ 

## 2. z

~ 

## 554 2- 3.5 Sq S 2 

### 3. 5' 5 43 

### " L 

### SLq N\5 S43 257 

### 3.5 sNS zS5 

## 3.5 Sy 6z 15" Sy(o ZSZ 

## S•o 545 Z47 

## ~ 47



## w7 qi 

## So W le 2 (cZ

L 

## 45
_~ f 

## qe lsokinetic Ffeld Daia Sheet - EPA ,tlethod ~~ Client ' "

~E ~'~ v'eKX 6. Run Number ~ Citv/State oA-1A0.,3&-J • AIL Date

~ 98 Sampling Location d'Z/OX ' A/W ofXW40S N o. $ ? ( -i fr/ T Operators 1 Bar. Press.. ln. Hg 2 

### ' t't NOMOGRAPH SET-UP LE4K CHECI(S Static Press.. In. H ; 0 f 

### O• 2,7 4H rF

~ r /- 0 & y= Avg. S P 

### o•3Z Pre-Test [n. Hg. Meter Box No. 

### 30 • O 15' Meter Temp. ~ Ref. A P 

### 0• 38 Post-Test 0. 00 t ~~ 

### _ In. Hg. Sample Box No. 

### /1, Stack Temp. 57 Desired Noale .3Z Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 a S2, ? 

### I In. H 2 O Probe/Pitot No. 

### ZOO •C34 Pitot Coeff


### . p , $

- 1 Noale vo. 

### .3 0 0

. 00 g Post-Test Pitot <0.1 :g In. H ; 0 Probe Temp. Setting Z 50 % Moistuts 7 Noale Calibration 0.310 C. 31 / O 4/t Sample ID No. Tg1 'd 1 C Factor D.~~0 3 Noule Diameter 0 

### - 3 i/ Observer Filter No. 

### A# Statt Time ~ 832 End Time 3l ! o Agency r ~
Sample Point Ciock

Time Drv Gas

lb(eter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading 0 P In. H 2 O Orifice

Setting JH [nchw H2O Ideal Actual Dry Gas Meter Temperature °F inlet Outlet Purnp

Vacuum Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter Box °F Imp. Temp °F 

### D 10.45 0.35 1.11 1."70 9 19 

### y7 •S 2S3 9 ~ 

### l 2.5 , I.1s

- 0 34 i. o Z I. v 53Z Z 3 Pi 3 S, o 13. q o 0.41 Z•oo z. vo Sb 46 (0.0 530 Z 38

~ 

### 7. S 15 . 0.4Z 2.2b Z 

### - 10 53 `t . 0 .1 Z 2 40 

### S /o.o 1. 0.39 l-qa l- ° IV 53 9 (0.0 327 2qs `iZ Z.S Ig. Z v.3 1-Ia5 1.l05' 'f 54o L 4 ~

Audited by: ki- Date: 31 r / /SQ /v0. /



# ~ A 1 

# s 2lsokfnetic Fleld Data Slteet - EPA .1letfiod

Client .Yt,,g 

## 1L~ ?)r'I CY- Ca RunNumber Z•-
Citv/State N c - Date 0 3 - a 3'2 8 Samplins Locntion 1 L - OperatorsiF e - pe Bar. Press.. In. Hg 

### Z4. I 2 NON10GRriPHS£T-UP LF.r1KCH£CKS Static Press.. In. H,0 

### ' 0 Z 5 &H.rr, !-$!p_ Y= L00 Avg. S P 

### a• 28 Pre-Test 

### D. o a'-f 'Fv 

### (0_ [n. Hg. Meter Box No: ) ~~ 

### 4 3 00 • 035 Meter Temp. 

### 15 Ref. S P D•,3fO Post-Test 

### D. ot)2 In. Hg. Sample Bo:c No. 

### I Stack Temp. 

### S45' Desited Nozzle 

### y• 3 37- Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 ru ~.~ In. H,0 ProbelPitot No. 

### 200- 0 39 Pitot Coeff. 0 

### 1' 4 Noale No. 

### 300. 00 4 6 Post-Test Pitot <0. I% • 7 0 ' 30 In. H,0 Probe Temp. Setting 

### 2 B M_ %Moisture 

### S Noale Calibration 

### () 3ro O. 311 D• sf 1 Sample ID No. 

### 1 1 a11 rt ) Z. C Factor 

### 1. OOU Noale Diameter D 11 Observer Filter No. 

### 49 Start Time 

### 0 0 1 53 End Time 

### 1 0 57 Agency
Sample Point Ctock

Time Drv Gas

Meter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading 0. P In. H2O Orifice

Setting AH Inches H,0 Ideal Actual Dry Gas Meter Temperature °F Inlet Outlet Pump

Vacuum Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter Box °F Imp. Temp °F 

### 0_0 Yl - 39 q t o.zS t• q f•30 by 60 7-•5 54e1 24 5(

Z 

### . 57 50.1-6 o.Z? I. i) I.yo 59 3•() 5(0 2.So I w ,v o.Zi l.Y I. v 54 ZSl 1. % V5 6.?_-7 I .yD 

### 1.40 (,c, 51 3

~ 

### 0 S45 - 

### L51 o.D 55.$ o•Za 1.45 (. ( 

### 01 5 Cl 3•o S43 24Z, qc, ip 

### I 57. o.z% (J5 

### (.q b% Lo .O `il 2.57 y7 I_O °59 •2.y 

### 0•31 Z.oa 2.00 10 La 0 Z.Sq 4


### o L 

### I?. 4f • l4 Q-5% 11

. 1 5 I.q g 11 ( 3 • 5' 59 z52 SO

Zb . o (e 3•Zo . 3 1•75

. - IS 1 Z. I (o 1 3.0 34 ti 4_5.

~ 2 1 24-1

~

o o.Zq I•So 

### 1•5

. 0 ?Z 1 (ol 3.0 O 50 

### t t 

### o

~ 

### t, ,l
~ 

### o.23 z.~ 

### I.ZO ? (OZ 

### t S zSco S► 

### IZ (, Z1 v.23 I.Zo (.z0 73 C,t 2.5 7 53 a zS 5►

6 q, a 

### O.L1 

### , 2.10 Z.10 `7 (c I 3. 

### 5't a z5 4 ~ 

### L Z,' .1v9 0.4 .3t ~ 

### L. c

~ 

### o (ol y•O 3 25 3Sc7 .?'
~ ' 0.

~ '%



### o•L(% t•'fs 

### 2-45 2. 

### 2•4s' 1 

### 15 

### b3 .5 SS(. 

### z Z.yz 

### z( , ` 50 

### 5 7 - 

### tp O. -0 

### L}2.5 .OZ 

### FA.I I 0•" 

### o• 9 2•7-0 

### 4 ,00 3.20 Z.00 1Co 

### 1-7 (o 

### GLi lo 

### q O SGZ 

### 56 ZLZ 

### 7-C.`4 S 

### 55

- 

### I 4C0 2•o4 0. 3 )•7 S 1.75 l(o tcy 3.5 - 5SI Z51

go.o 8s.c,? 0.30



### o. I.S 

### (•c0o 

### i. l.c.o 

### 14

14 

### IS

l~ 

### 3.0 3 v 5~ 

### Z(.o

Z 

### 53 5z 

### 10 SZ S 4$?_4 0.31 1. UV 7 (• (•`I 3- 1. o S u 153

253 S L 53 iZ 51, 5 `fo.

~ 

### '7 l.3S 

### 1. 3S
~ 

### •4 .v
~ 

### 3 253 3
ao S, 4A

_

( 43.10

Date: by: 

# ~ ~ 'v 

# QA i/• 7 ~ ~ ~ G~. V~ 

### 40 V " , 1~ 1~ 9



### B-7

~,~

### Isokinetic Field Data SJreet - EPA Jlethod 

## A

_

Client ~ Y~ r'fZ ~ Df

- t ~ _ Gt'. Run Number ~ City/State rn o. 

### ~ • t' 

### ~ L i Date n3- o 3- 9b S ampling Location Bf

- 1jd-- 'f0 1 +1 ~k~~a Operators Bar. Press.. In. Hg 1V0h10G1U1Pff SET-UP LE9K CIYECKS Static Press., In. H2O - 

### o- Z5 OH fg 

### I

~ 

### %t a Y= 

### l.DO Avg. p P D. 53 Pre-Test 0.0 0 3 'c ~ 1 D In. Hg. Meter Box No. 1o0 .035 Meter Temp. 1 0 Ref. J P 0 • 3 L Post-Test o• vo L u (4 In. H;. Sample Box No. ll Stack Temp. 5 y S Desired Nozzle 0• 311 Pre-Test Pitot <0. I ~ ~ . t ~ 3. i4n. H,0 ProbeJPitot No. 200 . o' 3 4 Pitot Coeff n. Qq Nozzle No. 300• 00 Q, Post-Test Pitot <0.1 In. H,0 Probe Temp. Setting 

### ZS % Moisture S Noale Calibration V• 31 O (23 11 0. 31 1 Sample ID No. ] I 9 I - 0 3 C Factor 0. ° ) 5 1 Nozzle Diameter 0•3 1 1 Observer Filter No. AJA - Start Time 11 I I End Time 12 I S Agency ^
Sample Point Clock

Time Drv Gas

Meter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading A P In. H Z O Orifice

Setting AH inches H 2 0 Ideal Actual Dry Gas Meter Temperature °F Inlet Outlet Pump

Vacuum inches Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter Box °F Imp. Temp °F 

### C+

- t•41 0.3g (.95 1•9S `1 b3 4-v 

## 535 239 49 Z z, qq. 1 6.(41 2.10 2.10 68

~ 

### 3 S. o 53 2 5 I `

~ 

### b

~ a~.4~ 

### v.y(, L 3S 2•3S (,9 (, 5.5 3`b 251 y 7• `1

~ 

### .57 o.u3 t-2 0 2.20 12 (n3 5.0 63 2

~ 

### fS 

### 5 I w. ~ 

### t 0-41 2.Ib 2.ro 1 5.0 4' Z49 47

102-1o'b 0,3 1-45 l•aS 1 IOS S.o 55 Z

~ 

### tS 4 q 

### ay•5

~ 

### b 0.31 1•c•o ,bo ~~ 

### (o y•5 558 2,50 50 l o t,.3 o.z9 (•50 1.50 1 b S 4 

### .0 5S5 49 

### ci 

## Zo.o (d$.c,q O.zs l.y '(.y5 17 •Gce

~ 

### {.0 553 ZS'

~ 

### I 56 IO ZZ. ~ 

### log. 6.2 ~ 

### I. o C'.

~ 

### fo ~ 

### L L 

### ilc3 5 Z5 7 51

~ 

### I 2.. I1 

### l,

~ 

### 3 o.z (•ZS /.zS

- 

### 7 ` 3•s 5.3% Zs S) tz 17. 

### 4
~ 

### IJ•oa o.zz (.ts 

### l.ls '

~ 

### g (

~ 

### 7 •0 '53 5 2-S8 50 $ 1 t ~ 

### O.z3 

### VZo l. ZD 'l l,V 

### 3•0 531 56 49 

### Z. 32. r/r'oIlg 

### 0.

- n 2o t.20 

### 15 bto 3.0 S36 t55 4 3 aZ`1 Z /ZS 'i5 co(o 3.0 53 6 255 `fV 4 1 l°t. 1 1 6 0.25 1•30 1.3p l4 t• S 

### 3-5 53$ z5z yy 5 •D Ilo.14 O.zS 1•30 /.30 13 65 36 535 Z55 y ~

Z 

### ` /ZZ - 3 /• 3 0 l. 30

- 

### 77- 64 3•5 35 

### ZS(o 45 .0 1 17-3. 0-3to 1 1.817 ).B S 1 5 4-5 53to 25(, yL 

### 41.5' 1 ( z-5.?7 

## d. t.8o 1. ebo 14 (n5 y•5 3' ~ 

## ZS G c' V



### - o 127L3 

### 0.-30 (•55 l. 

### SS 14 

### Io5 t+.v S3 q Z5_? Y0 / Zq. y o•z P. `

~ 

### S 1.145 T (, to y- 0 51 15*4 4

5.0 C3(.1 1 0•7-S 1-00 l.30 b 3•5 536 Z.SS `{ l2 " 13t, 6.24 (.ZS /.ZS* S Wo 53fo 25( 0 50

13

~ 

### 4 . 33 _j I. S

- 7



### s ' ed by: N~" Date: l I/ ~
4 

# QA~ 

# s 156 140. 4 4
~l~

## EPA Method 3- Molecular Weight DeterminatioR - Data Analysis

Client Name 

### F14E HA+•— BR" C1?. Project Number 

### 044-q7 - l 9 1 City/State 

### MA0150r•l + IfG SampleDate 

### 03 

### ~ 0 

### ~ 1 q 

### ~ Sampling Location 

### 2ic4 

### (Gud Ez

~~ 

### wsr Operator 7DA Sample Type VL Tedlar Bag ❑ Multipoint ❑ Single Point Fuel Type 4,%TV0Zwt. 6AS Analyzer Type Fvrite Serial # 

### 3tr0_w3 dOaygen Calibration Check Must Be 20.9 ± 0.1% 

### A.oA, *w,- Trw A!gX 3 5mmL d 131442. Run # and/or Sample ID ~ 

# I 1tl 1 - 05 Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) OgI S " 

## 04 0

Fas :: Re licate I.. `Re licate 2' Re licate 3` Avera
~ e: PetrenE: Multlpiier. : Molecuiar R eigbE Drg iGFlb mole: Actual Net: Actusl ` Nei ActnaT < Net 

### 3 •0 3. D 3.0 3.0 Z.8 2.1 2•43 0.44 

### i. S,S

~ 

### s.s Is, s I s. g► 

### S, U D "' d3z

~ 

### !. 99 Z N=: lo. fI S 100 .

~ 

### 1. S 100
Tot ' i

Run # and/or Sample ID Z 1 ( 9 I — 01 0 Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock)

t~ : Re Itcate 1' Re licate 2. Re licate3' Average : Pereent Multiplier ; De
~ r ib/lb moi Actval

_ Net' Actual Net ' Aclusi Net:: 

# co ~ 2~ 

### 2. S Z(o 2.1. Z. s 2-S 2•S3 ° ~ 

### I, 13 

# °_ ~`•~ ~~.c is.9 lS.9 c,.0 

### r~ 

### .o ~ 

### 4 °3z ` Molecuiar WeigI



### s110 

### N = loo y1.S ioo: 81•S ioo' SLS

~ 

### i•SO a

~ 

### :2s 22.SZ0 Total Zq• 043

Run # and/or Sample ID 0 / Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) 

### 11 V Z — I ZyS

Gas Re licate 1 Re licate 2 Re licate 3
1 Average Percent Multiplier Molecular Weigbt Dry IbJlb moie Actual Net` Actual Net Actua) Net 

### Ca: Z.$ 

### Z.g 3.0 3: 0 2. 4' 2.1 

### 2.77 0.44 

### 1, Z.fo3 IS. 9 

## Is. q/s ?3 osa 

## S. oLl. N= 100 loo 

# I $t.i Ioo ?1.3c) ZZ. Total 

### Zq

. OQ3



## ~ b r 

# ~ Date: 3 

# ~ r9 

# rQ

~~ Kiited
, B-9

-

### EPA Method 26A - Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis

Client Name 

### F^ E 4A44 attw-K CG. Project Number 

### 64 - Q7 - 19 1 Ciry/State 

### Iq,4w5o..1 L 4C Sample Date 0 

### 31000 Sampliiig Location 

### $RtUC {

~ 

### (,

~ 

### J EtrliWSr-

~ 

### o• S f

~ 1+JrSamples Recovered By 7 Q Clean-Up Box Number S Recovery Date 03 04 Q Chain of Custody: Date Received ~~l ~~ 8 Received By ~ Locked7 

### Equipment Documentation
Run Number 1 7- 3 Sam le ID Number 19( -d5 7191 -o(o '7141-o r/ Sam le Box Number lZ 12, IZ Probe Number Zov • 0 34 7oO-oV Zay 

### .0 y Analysis of Moisture Recovery Rea2ent Recoverv Container # 19 1-05 191 -o(- 'f /9l -07 Im ineer Absorbing Solution 0. 14 d

- 25 0 .1 AJ OaSO o.l Al i4 aSo4 Descri tion of Rea ent C ~~ ta ✓ Ca ✓ Rea¢ent Level Marked? ~ `~ ✓ Final Volume, ml 2 ~ S 110 Z4S Initial Volume. ml ZeG Zad 2-oa Net Condensed Volume, ml # 7 S O S Rea ent Recoverv Container # 7i41 - a T 7191 - o(i 0 719 - O'1 Im in er Absorbing Solution 1PJ AkO 4 0. 14 AI40 0.1 J NaCg Descri tion of Rea ent Cow etW/ 

## ckw Rea ent Level Marked'? ✓ ✓ ✓ Final Volume, ml o - O iol tio Initial Volume, ml I o o eo ieo Net Condensed Volume. ml O Silica Gel Recoverv Container # / Z 3 Percent Silica Gel S eiit 1 0 7_0 ~ Fina! Wei ht. g 201• 0 08. 05 Initial Weisrht. oo,t) 2.00.0 2oO.D Net Absorbed Water. g Total Rea ent Collected. LF 

### Sample Recovery
Recoverv Container # 7191-0$' os 'jr41-o!
~ 7111-0'1 RinsinQ Solution De u JarViL bt (J.FM D,.)wrM Sam le Container Sealed7 Li uid Level Marked? ✓ ` ~ 

### Reagent Blanks 

## v

- 1_

Rinsi F3 IQI-o&
D:..c, Absorbin¢ Blank Identification #


### 11 Reviewer liritialr 

### O%.A

## ► L _ ^ RinsinQ Blank Identitication # iA ::<;: ..: ,.::...

~ r :.. ,.: :. .....:.:tiC ea
~ Isokinetic Field Data Slreet - EPA ;Kerhod Client T/A1E J1Y'W& 40014K CC1 1 - Run Number 

### ~ City/State /1-40i3Oi ~ AJC Date 

### 3

~ 0 

### 4 ' /8 Samplinz Location B'' 2 K.k , K"d EXW4KJST -/Yd• S Operntors ~ 

### \W< J

~ 

### Q Bar. Press.. ln. Hg 

### Z a.S$ Static Press.. In. H : 0 'y • Z. S "+leter Box No. 30o, 03S Sample Box Vo. 1 Z ProbelPitot No. 7_10o.03 k4 PmbeTemp. Setting Z5' ~ Sample ID No. 711 Fiiter No. ^/-4 

### oHg 1 .bV 

### Y= l.oy Meter Temp. 3 a Stack Temp. 1 A15 Pitot Coeff. D, QW % iVloisture C Factor f7 M O S Start Time n 9i1 S' Avg. p P 0.

- Z S, Pre-Test O ou 1 'g 1 t ) In. Hg. Ref. % P b. 3"1 Post-Test

. D 0 0( u In. Hg. Desired Noale 

### D, 3-H Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 Lv G. ~ 

## . T. y in. H,0 Noule No. 306.04Z Post-Test Pitot <0.1 

# w 4 3. S' In. H,0 Nozzle Calibration 0• 310 0.311 0.311 Nozzle Diameter 

### D.311 Observer End Time O e 11 '1 Agency NOMOGRAPff SET-UP L64X CHECXS

Sample Point Clock

T'une Drv Gas

Meter Cubic Feer Pitot

Reading a P In. FI t O Orifice

Setting :1H Inches H Z O Ideal Acttta} Drv Gag Meter Temperature'F Ialet Outlet Pump

Vacuum IncHes Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter Box °F Imp. ! Temp 

# ~ 'F 

### 0.0 t , (.0 0.30 1, 0 & l.So y'2. 4 I H. 4k,3 24 B 4 

### 1 2 2.S 134. 2t7 013 I.IoS 1-toS 'i4 41 Li.S 46 1 250 9 1 3 1•tou 1.b0 4 

### 5 41 4.5 y1r) 253 4v Y '7. 5 139 . 1 0 S. 0 IS14 '+Z I S /c• o I.24 .14 ,& I. 4a 4 5•0 y gt 15 

### G 12.5 142.ti 0-10 11.40 /.50 50 43 5•0 44 

### IS o I 2 O.ZS 11.Z , I.Zo 51 43 SO 4 2 

### 17•6 - 1Li+0. 11 0.2Z. r. o% 1.10 5Z. 1 

### 43 4.0 485 24 g 20 . 0 1 y'1 .153 0. Z . 0 S 1, S2. 43 3• 5 ' ZS t 4 4 v

~ 

### 0 2z . S ms.q 1 b.zl !. o S 5 

### 3 4 0 3 , 5 2S') y t/ ZS.a 150.3z e.i 6A3 0.$3 C31A ( 

### 45 3•0 4 65 t5 4

- 7 /2 27. 5' i1 - L.1 o.1 0. %3 was S4 y e, 5.0 

### y te 4 A3 i 

### 3a . 0 15z .$4 0, 

### o. $ 8 0. 3.0 tA 60 vis 4io
z 3t.S 

### 154.15 0-IS 16.$ o. WS 54 t, 3•0 41all ZSZ- 4to .3 35•0 15S.43 0.19 10.93 0.93 S4 4b 3•0 41, tSo y 5 37.5 1154•78 0.19 1 0.13 0 -23 5 15 41.1 3.0 4170 145 45 

## s ya.o t

. v.l°1 1 693 o.crs Sb 41 3.0 4 ZS% 4 (a 42.6 15 , y5 6•21 

### I.oS 1.05 'S(* Li 3•S 4(O

- ) 2 

### -55 `fb 'qs • o 140. S 6-31 1. 5 C) 51 4 5.0 443 Z 1 48 8 V?.S 161•50 6.10 1.44, 150 5S 4 1 13 •0 4 25 3 1 4 9 So.o I64.1 o.n 1.3

. 5 1•3 51 y ' y f, 3 Z4 o io 

## y9 y•v 4 y t5q 5 0

tD7.Z Z 1 

### .15 1• I S 51 4 4.0 y y 2.5 51 iL 

### 57.5 IU&1S 6 

### -7-4 1115 t. 45 y ~ 

### 473 2- v 5

~ 

### p. 0 1

- 1 u. z3

~ - 

### 3 .c
~ 

# U<

. .audired by: PC Date: 

# Aeog%lsokinetic Field Dura Sheet - EP.a .Kethod

Client r/./E ~ ' 8Q/C-A- , C- 0 •
Citv/State AJCRun Numb 

## ~ Z Date 

## .3 ' 

## ~ ' 18 Sampling Location ~'' 2 ~x ~~ ~'~~•~ - N~• J~ l~i. ✓ r Operators 

### 3?k 1 I DT~
ar. Press.. In. Hs 

### ZI • S 1 NOMOGRAPHSET-UP LF.r1K CffECKS Static Press.. In. H2O - y ' ~ 5 AFi ~~~ Y= ~•~ Avg. S P 

### O ZS Pre-Test 

### a• n uy ~ Jt) In. Hg. Meter Box No. 

### )W • O55 iVleter Temp. Ref. a P i7. 3'7 Post

- Testd ~ Z
~ u ~ _ [n. He

Sampie Box Vo. Stack Temp. 4l < Desired vozzle 

### 0.343 Pre-Test Pitot <0.I y 1.Z t lo In. H : 0 ProbuPitoc vo. 7 W•D34 Pitot Coeff. O. c,6 4" Noale No. Jm - 0 9 t Post-Tesc Pitot <0.1 § 1413. S fn. H,0 Probe Temp. Setting Z. S t) °/, iVioisture 1 6 No2zle Calibration 0.31 O 0.111 (>.31 1 Sample ID No. 

### ? 1 9

r - aO C Factor 0.914 Noale Diameter Observer Filter No. /I/.+ Stan Time O c1 y Cd End Time 1 y5 Agency

I Sample Point Clock

Time Dry Gas

imeter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading a.P In. H 2 O Orifice •

Setting .SH [nches H,0 tu Ideai Acal Dry Ga5 Meter Temperature'F Inlet Outlet Pump

Yacuum Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter Box °F Imp. I Temp 'F I 

### A• / o.o I'1 .u'7 0•31 I.

~ S I• ~d~ 5 '1 3• ~ y`bZ 25Z

~ 13 Z 2.5 172--`61 D.N0 1-8D 

# I ' 

## 3 s.o 7.tolj .40 ZSy Z 1 

### / 7. 5 1 , 7t,-5 3 

## o, qb 

# .as I.-K Sy 

### q 

## ..S yaS zS3 

## 4 Z S /ro. o I

- 7

. 6.

- 5e ~.~'f l.~s So 

### 3.5 490 2s% 43 12.5 1 0

00 -ZZ c.m Ins G 1 ., (.Z 51 3. 5 

### 4a S Zn 4 l ~~ 1 . oo

2 0.28 t.3s II-4-o S% SO 26 0 

### -q 17•5 .V0 1.1% 1•30 17 So lo 49 , 0 7- Sl 4 26.0 IC65.Z4 O-ZS 1,Z1 I.Z S) ZLo N 

### o 22.5* 1$ 7 b.z3 

### I. z. 1,10 55 51 Z• 41 S' 

### Ztoo 4S Z6.0 1$8 .z4 O zZ. I.o s i/ l.to s5 5 r Z• L4J. Z.t+o 4 S 

### i2 27.5 

### 1 ZR. o 0 .2•z NOS !. Jo 5 1 Z• 

### (p4o 7J.PQ '!3 i 3a.0 ISI .1S 02) 

### l.oz J.00 S lf Sr .o z 

# so Z 32.5 '97•SS o•zz 1.0 5G 51 7--4 4 Z5 

### .3 35.0 193.9 o.Z 

### l.lZ I.t o 9 51 2. 5 4`b Zeo 

### 37. 5 11

. 6 z' L 1,09 120 51 51 z. 493 ~ 

### S 

### s

~ 

### /o.0 9~ 

### • .z3 

### oz. l./d Sq S2 2•S y9 LSz

~ 

## s l a .z o• z 3 1.z. . l o 

## Y 9 

## 25 4(.

~ 

### s • 0 199•7 , q .3z 1 5a 11. 40 0 G o sl 3.p IM 7

- 53 

### 46 8 47.5 - zol.5 0. - 95 I.
- ) < r.7 ' 6 1 4°1Ce Zcoo 'f$ 

### 9 So.o Zo

~ •z( 0•30 1.49 ).So 61 

### S .0 45o -7-55 4 b 

### /o Z.`5 04. % 0.21, 1•7.% I-So to"L 53 3.0 4acp 1 

### 254 '-K

~ 

### i 55.0 2o t-! o.zZ l.oS l lv 61 Z.S 4 , ) el ZS f 

### 45 0 /L 

### 57.5 ZJl• 3 D. Z1 1. oZ /. O0 

### (c`Z.

2 0 `f , ZS lo~•~ S

.. ~

. 

### .

Audited by: Date: ,s6 1t-1

- 

# QA B - 12

~~lsokineric Field DatQ Slreet - EP.a .Ylelhod Z ( c~ Client F1.11E 'a- &iCie Run Number. 3 CitviState / /40i30 7 k/ , A/ C Dace •3 b ' J8 Sampling Locntion 8etcje // , O• SAOAIr Operators YPk NO 14
Bar. Press.. In. Hg •

7-9_ NOMOGRAPff SET-UP LF.r1K CNECKS Static Press.. In. H.0 AH'u ~ ~Qj~ Y b V Avs. A P 0 •7-$ Pre-Test 0.0O7. 40_ [n. Hg. Meter Boc Vo. !P ° ' V3

~ ' Meter Temp. L C7 Ref. ~ P y • 3 7 Post-Test o•

~ O Z ~~ _ [n. Hg. Sample Box vo. Stack Temp. Desired Noale 0 • 

### 333 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 r 7,Ir [n. H,0 ProbeuPitot Vo. 2CO-o 3y Pitot Coeff. 0 • $ u Noale No. U4? Post-Test Pitot <0.1 'm') ' 0 3 [n. H : 0 ProbeTemp.Settina I 50 %,Moisture NoaieCalibration b,:UO 0.31) O.'i/1 Sample iD No. 1 719! ' a? C Factor (a, Noale Diameter 

### 4• 3il Observer Filter No. AJa' Sttut Time IA WL End Time 

### IZ o S Agency
Sample Point Clock

Time Dry Gas

Meter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading & P In. H2O Orifice

Setting .SH Inches H2O Ideal Actual Dry Gas Meter Temperazurt'F Inlet Outlet Pump

uacuum Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter

Box °F [mp. Temp °F A/ o. o Zoq.44 o,Zo 0.99 0, Scl 5to 5Z 3.0 L4 25 4(o 

### Z 2•S 2.10.'1 o-ZZ. l.OS 

### 1.10 Sl 5 

### 3 S.o z

. 

### lz. C

- s 0



### . 2 :N ),IZ 1.io 

### S5 SZ

- 

### 3.5 L 

### i1Z Zio1

~ 

### 3 1

' 

# l 7.6 I 3.c, 9 v.z 1 1. oz. 1.00 ~ 

### i SZ .Z 

## ( } Z.S4 43 ~ 

### S /c. o Z 1 

### 5.o ~ 

### o-ZZ 1.0$ 1: 1 

### 0 l.L S S. ~ 

### 4 zsaS 4 ~ 

### G 12 • 5 Z l, .5 o.2.a .1 ~ 

### 1.ZO LZ S3 y.o yq t55 4 ~

!~ 

### ' o z i.oz c.33 I.c,5 I. b3 5 

## 4 S•t ) 

### zt..v ' ~ 17 • ~ Z r 5.18 0:3
~ 1 1. lfl q 1.7 c ~



### i/ (. 5

~ l S•S 't5 `

~ `t ) Zc .o Lzl.s3 0• I 1. S I.

~ 4 .C ~ 4 Z53

~ {`1 

### /d 22.s ZZ'3.Zc.. a.L`E . I' ) 

### .Z.C ~ 

### 64 

## 4 C~ `~$v 

### Z53 5 ~ 

### 26.0 iz4 . Z. o ZZ J. oa .1p u.

~ 

### }.O 4l1 2 4 S( /2 27.5 LZCo .30 0•Z I . oZ , 00 LA, '5 5 3.5 y Z.SZ 3 ~ 

### !3 / 30.0 Zz7. 0•35 I.'1S 1 1.7

- 

### 5 63 5V 5.0 y11. 7_5 S I 

### Z 32.5 Zz9.49 0.34

. ~ 

### a .70 t

~ 

### e 5 .0 47"1 S 1 .3 35 •0 

### .Z 0. 

## 3% • 8

. 0 b 7 5 7 

### .v ! 47 ~ 

### Z(Po SI

3

- 

### 7. 5 .12 p. 3b l. 9? I• 9 0 (,1 

### 8 G. 0 4 

### 7 $ S o 2. o.

- 

### 7 5 6.0 47Z

~ 

### O Yk .S Z.8 0.33 t. 665 

### lo I'le 58 47Z Zt, ! S ~ 

### yS• o z38.toz o.Z?j 1 .1 0 

### A9 0 b L 4 57 Sv 4 3 59 s 

### 8 1 

### /7. S S Zyo. 3Z 0-2 /.Z! 1• ZO (#3 58 4. n 489 Z1.Z 

### 55 So.o Z'fl. tY I o.2`/ 

### l. . Zo W 59 1 1 

### 4 ,0 4 8 71 , Z 55
I 

### 9 io 

## 2'5 zy?. 37 02Y 1.1'1 1.20 (, S too W 

## .0 gso 251 S 55, o 0.7-'3 i. 

### l. l o lo 5' [.o Lt. v 471 Z S9 54 I

~ 

### L 57.5 24(a.

~ 

### + 0 

### .2 .tZ. I.rCO (c ~ 

### loD y.o 47 Z51 5S ' (00• o Z 85 

## 4 

# _ 3

~ 

## . a• Z 

# 1 ...: 

## :/. 3
~

Audited by: /fft Date: 

# 3 / / ~ 

# ~ Q QA B - 13 ~~ ~

### APPE

~ 

### IDLX B

FIELD DATA SHEETS



## I

- ~

~ 

## :.1 ~ 

## TfalOO1V I ~wStock Diameter - 12 • 24 inches Reloc2te to 0.50 inches Stock Diameter > 24 inches Relocate to 1.00 inches 

# F 7A ZZ C EPA Method 1 Determination of Sampling Ports and Points

Client I P IAIC- 17 1

4U- BAICAe 6-1^4ftl */ - Cirv/Smte /A4POCA/ -

, 

### AIC Sampling Location 

## BA" kl" , 

### V C -, rll"WJr - Ak. - 1- 11 4 dr Date 

## 3 - 2- - 

## 9 8

A



# 63

SAdfPLINC

K K



### B

DISTURBALYCZ

Schemadc of

Sampling Locadon Sampling Location Dimensions: 

## 45 1

' From Far Wafl to Outside of Port

Nipple Length Depth of Duct Width (Rectangular Duct)
Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE): 2 x Length x Width 2( DE = Length - Width +

Distance to Ports From Nearest Flow Disturbance: Upstrearri - A Downso

- cam - B Dimensions in Inches 

# ov

Duct Diamcters 1.00 Stack Ara. in Sqiiiare Feet 

## •67- CalculationsBy 

## 7t=L

-

Location of Travorse Points in. Circular Stacim


# .

....... .. 4 6 

# a 10 12 1 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 

# 1

2 25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 6.7 3 75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.3 4 93.3 70.4 32.3 1 2.6 17.7 5 85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0 6 ...............

ms 95.6 90.6 65.8 35.6

- 7 89.5 77.4 64.4 8 96.8 85.4 75.0 9
..... ......

....... .. .......... .. ............... ... 

# . ..... ... 91.8 82.3 10 97.4 98.2 93.3 12 97.9

Locstion of Travene Poina in Rectangular ShmM 2 3 4 5 6 1 25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 2 75.0 50.0 37.5 30.0 :5.0 21.4 18.8 3 83.3 62.5 ;0.0 41. 1 35.7 31.3 4 37.i

- 0.0 ;9.3 50.0 43.8 90.0 75.0 

### 1 64.3 56. 3 91.7 78.6 69.3 7 92.9 91.3 8 .. ..... .. 

# . ........ .. ....... 93.3 9 ... ...... 

# . ... .... .. 10 V It 

# si 12 

## f

Audited bv D I 

# A*- T %

### EPA alethod Z

Determination of Stack Gas Velocity, Volumetric Flow Rate and Cyclonic Flow
Client AtL &2i-.K (: ~ D . Sampling Lucati p n ic.Az icN E Run Date 

### T2 >g Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 27,00 Static Pressure. in. H

- )0
~ 

### s3r1 ~ 

### —O. 2 5 Static Pressure, in. He _ o. o! Q Stack Pressure. in. Hg LV.`7'b i Stack Dimensions. in.. diameteriside I City. State /Ti+D/i e,d . Operators AiL 

### ~ TPC Time / 6 ,

Ot) Pitot Tube I.D. No. 2dW.0 Date Calibrated 

### /— 3 - 9I Pitot Tube CoetFcient 

### 0. Leak Check. in. H-)O <0.1 i_ ~ _ Side ?, in. 

### Field Data

Point Number . D etermination

~ I

~ •
. " .; 

## . _ ~ 

## . I

~ 

## ' - ' '

~ 

## '

~ 

## ' • . ® • ie I

~ • ~ ~ 

## C1:1:a ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~

~



### ®MAi

~ 

### ii-



## ~

# ■■ ~~~~~~

# ■■ ~~~ ~
~

; ~~~~~~~_~

# ■■ ~ ~ i 

## ~~~r~~~~ ~ ~

~~~~~~ ~

# ►

, ~

~~~~~ ~~s ~ ;

~~ , • 

## ~~~~~ - ~ Stack Temperature. Drn•.'F (ik) 

### 130 Stack Temperature. Wet°F(B) 90 Ditttrence (A - B) 

### 77 ~ 

### -- Preliminary Percent Moisture 

### S.

Comments 

# r OA 

# N rb . • v 

### ~ l' 

### ~ 

### DaaQ f id~ ~ B - ~ 1L f mm m"00 ~

## EPA Method 3- Moleeular Weight DeterminatioR - Data Analysis

Client Name 

## PIIvE HAIt RRIO Co

. Project Number 

### d46'9'j' (9tj City4tate 

### f1ADISoN, NC Sample Date Sampling Location 

### BRICK KILN EXHAUS'T - Ne. 5 PLANT Operator 

### RFC/JPK Sample Type 

### d Tedlar Bag 

### d Multipoint o Single Point Fuei Type 

### NATVRAL GA S Analyzer Type 

### Fvrite Serial # 

### 300.003 e(Osygen Calibration C3eck Must Be 20.9 ± 0.1% 

### Anebrt Tyre r14k 5 

### Serf , -1 # 1316AZ 

### Run # and/or Sample ID 

### RVN I Sampling Time (24 = Hour Qock) 

### d$ 31 ' 01 34

,. 

### 6as

. 

### =` Re licate

~ 

### I Re ificate 2` Re licate 1 ,.:.. 

### > Avera;a Percent ': MuItipiier

. .. 

### Molecular Weigbt

Dry IWIb moi

~ 

### Actnai ` Net Actaal Net . 

### kctnsl Net '. 

### CO:::' 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.S
~ 

### :4a I.loo 5 

## .114 100 21.3 >. I08_: 81.4 Ni. <IOa ; 8l.3 81.33 0.2s 22.112 Total 29,046



### Run # and/or Sample ID 

### R u N 2 Sampiing Time (24 - Hour Clock) 

### 09S3- 1 0 51

,.: ; 

### Re licate 1 ,:



### ::. Re Iicafe l: '>: ; .;



### Re licate3

~ 

### kveca

~ 

### e ;.Muitiplier Molecniar Wei

~ 

### t

. . .. 

### Actt.al , _ 

### Net . .. ., 

### ActuaF Net' . Actvat Net Percen ~ 

### Dryli ~ 

### mole 

## co Z 3 -0 3. 0 3. 0 3. e 3. 0 3.0 3.0 

# ::..:;. <;oa::: :::::

.... 

# .. 1.320 15.9 IS.9 IS.' 15.87 8 

### N r _ ° l0Q ;: H 1. 

## 2: Ioo . E1.! Io ~ 

## SI . I 81.13 .:: .: a

~ 

## .2s ;:::. 22. 7 16 Total 29 • 

### ~ ( `I

Run # and/or Sample ID 

## Rvv? Sampling Time (24 - Hour Qock) 

### I 111- 1215

; 

### Gas Re licats l Re licate 2' Re iicate ,. 

### 3 Average Multi lier - P

: .:;; .



### :' Moiecular W e" t. Actval NeC ,4ctna 

### t NeE Actusi _' Net 

### Percent:_ ::::. "D li

~ 

### /lb moie r7 

## Cos::: 2.5 2.S 2.5 2.S 2.S 2.S 2.S »>

~ 

## ° ::::: 1.100 I 16.0 i :: ri = .::: 

## 81.5 ioQ - YLS

~ 

## ov:::.: ::»:aoo:.:: 81.6 51.53 

# : a.2 ~ 

## ` 2Z.t2Y Totai 29.039

i 

# A

.; ~ .a Zo/ 98 

# ~

,

### EPA iVfethod 26A - Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis

Client Name 

### ~ FJE 

### ~ gcc aeice Co. Project Number 07/O

- S7-/9/ Ciry/State A/L Sample Date 3 - 3-9g Sampliiig Location e,u ✓ CxWq ,, rF - -n.b 

### 5 i p,4 ✓ rSamples Recovered By QFC Clean-Up Box Number 

### S Recovery Date 

### 3-3 -78 Chain of Custody: Date Received 

### 3

- 3

- g~ Received By 

### ~~ Locked? 

### Equipment Documentation
Run Number / 2 ,3 Sam le ID Number 191-0 / 7 1 51 - o;- 7151-03 Sam le Boz Number 12- / Probe Numbec wc- eve 

### Analysis of Moisture Recovery Rea ent Recoverv Container # ?/9/ -o/ /9/ -Oz 7/9/ -d3 Im in er Absorbing Solution o. i Ff dz Sc o•/F ✓ <4 So Descri tion of Rea¢ent Rea ent Level Marked7 ✓ ✓ ✓ Final Volume, ml 

### 2G 3 L7 2- Initial Volume ml Zoo 7-00 Zoo Net Condensed Volume. ml (e 3 • 4 7/• v 72.0 Rea ent Recoverv Container # 7/S/ 9 191 -°3 Im in er Absorbine Solution o. /n/ LOA ~ O v. / 1 Akv Descri tion of Rea ent Rea ent Level Marked'? ✓ ~ Final Volume. ml c7 /O 00 Initial Volume, ml /oo i.o /oo Net Condensed Volume. ml 0 Silica Gel Recoverv Container # / L 3 Percent Silica Gel S ent 3 0 30 0 Final Wei ht. g 2-06. 3 209• 2 , 42- [nitial Wei ht. 2.oJ 2- 00 Zoo Net Absorbed Water. ¢ 8 3 9• 2, T'otal Rea¢ent Collected, Q 9/. 8 , ~ 7 1 g/. Z. 

### Sample Recovery
Recoverv Container # 7/9/ -o / / 9/-o z 7/S/ -c3 Rinsin¢ Solution D/ JdTTA- o'j'''' ~ ~F~•~ Sam le Container Sealed7 Li uid Level Marked? l 

### ~ 

### Reagent BlanksIsokinetic Field Data Sheet - EPA .Kethod 

### 2(074

FWE 4cL <:o ~ Client 

### . Run Number Citv/State /'7ADrJeuA1 • itiL Date -98 Sampling Location 

### eyt/ geXi14o'ST ' No• S/ d4 j 6 ✓ T ~

Operators /
~ G TP
Bar. Press.. In. Hg 

### ~ ' ` I 

### ~ NOMOGRAPFI SET-UP LE4K CFlEC1CS Static Press.. In. H,0 ~ D• Z ~ pH Fu Y= Avg. A P 

### o•3Z Pre-Test 0. ov 1 eZ 

### %s

~ 

### - In. Hg. Meter Box No. 

### 10- 0 1-5 Meter Temp.

~ 

### S Ref. A P 

### o•3 8 Post-Test 0.00 i'cb In. Hg. Sample Box No. 1 ~~ Stack Temp. Z N 77 Desired Nozzle .12 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 g ( 6 72, ? In. H Z O Probe/Pitot No. 

### Z ° O' o34 Pitot Coeff. 

### O. 8 "► Noaie No. .30e .

~ g Post-Test Pitot <0.1 1n. H : 0 Probe Temp. Setting 

### Z 5 o % Moisture 

### 6 7 Nozzle Calibration O• 3t d 0.311 Sample 1D No. 7111 'OI C Factor 

### 0. 1 10 Noale Diameter 0 • i1 Observer Filter vo. uo Start Time 0832 End Time 3~ o Agency
Sampte Point Clock

Time Drv Gas

A

~ (eter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading

~ P [n. H=O Ori6ce

Setting

~ H Inches H:O [deal Actual D cy Gas lvteter Temperature'F Inlet Outlet Pump

Vacuura Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F FiIter Box °F Imp. Temp °F 

### A i D 10.4 0.35 1.

- 1 t 1.'70 1 

### 19

~ 

### 7 • S 535 1 Z 2.S r,IS' 0 34 11.70 1.70 53z Z5Z 3 

### 3 5.o i3. o 0.4 2.00 z-vo Sa 46 (o.o 2. 39

~ 

### 1 7.s ig 0.4Z 2,.A 2. i0

~ 

### i 6.0 S Z a 40

~ 

### l0. o I. 0.3q 1-9 a l- ° IO 53 L{ (o.0 527 2y !~ 

### 2.,r 

### Iti . z v.3 l-(OS 1 

### . 4 15 • 

### 4 S.o 540 t.41 4T q y5 3 252- 45 8 1/7-5

- ?_5-os 0.2$ l.Yo l• qo S SI 1 `t-S 

### 55cr 7-59 1 W 

### 9 Zo.o 

### 7-.(,5 o.z` 1.3 D l• 

### ,so 55 

### I 1 

### 4.0 55g V4 IN y /o 2Z, O' Zl, .2'1 

### 0• Zl. 1.30 

## 4► 4 ,0 Ss Z. 

### `tt 26• 0 V. iN 0•2. 1 4 1.2o (•Zo 61 q.6 1 55 , 4 Zl.o 4$ iZ 27. 

### L9 • 33 o.Z3 1 1.1c , !. r o b Z S 

### 3 3.5 S4 S 25

~ 3 0

•a 

### 30.81 o• Z3 1 1.10 

### Itla 5 Pl S4 3 545 253
z 34•5

, 

## 3z.2co o.zz l.oa I.rO (nZ 5q 3.5' 543 Z 

## Sq 36.0 s. o•2 z 1.0 $ 3 l. lc> 

## 63 

## 5y 3A5 S43 257 45

~ 

## 37 23 l. ro 1J4 S 3.5

~ 

## 45* 4 f25 

## '

~ 

## 5 S • 0 3 

## e .5 0.2 1-lo I.IO
~ y S 3• 

## 5 59 I 'Ii

~ Z•.S 3 b 3 1110 1.10 

### L5 ss 3.5* PI(. ZSZ q(o 

### 7 iT.0

- 

### 3i.r,4 0.3H J• 1.7o L,s 5.0 5y Z.y 4b 8 10.5 41.2to o. 1.7 

### 1 1.7U bl, •0 

### 4l 4 t5 

### 47

~ /o S S 

### a .o ,SZ• ~ 

### (-43,

W'•}.?S" 

### 0.31

0.2 

### l.s S/-

•2 

### 55

O 

## 6q ~al~ 

### <to S~ 

### 5-0

~~ 

### y3 

### ZS

OI 

### q7

i 55.0 1 4to31 o.Iq o.93 0•93 0 57 3•0 5 z o 

### 12 5 

### 75 y7 `f 019 O.q O 4-1 

### 57 1.0 1 5 q1 Z5 ~ 

### C)

.o 141 IZ


### I3avl 10• 

## E t~ 12001
~ 

## : ! ~u~ ~ ~ 

## ' ::>:;:; >. >

Audited by: Date: ✓ / 1/ /SQ /va r


# ~ : . / in lsokinetic Fleld Data Slleet - EPA .Ylethod 

# _2(on_

Client ~~~~ ~ 1'1 C.).l ?)r' 1c)(- C,r ,~ Run Number Z City/Sta[e N ( -- Date O 3 - ~ 3 -e f S Sampling Loca[ion ~ L - Opera[ors ~-~ P~ Bar. Press., In. Hg 

### 24 • I Z 1V0N10GR4PH SET-UP LF,

~ lK CHECKS Static Press.. In. H 2 0 

### ' 0 • Z S DI I. ~ 

### I - $ln_ Y= 

### 1,00 Avg. A P 

### 0• 28 Pre-Test 

### D• 0 a`{ ~u O~ In. Hg. Meter Box No )"1--



### 4-; 3 00 • D 37 Meter Temp. 

### 1 S Ref. J P D. ,31D Post-Test 

### D. 002 (Cv 

### ';_ In. Hg. Sample Box No. ~ Stack Tem 

### S

~ 

### S p. Desired Noale 

### y• 33Z Pre-Test Pitot <0.I r^u 6 

# .19 ( In. H,0 „ Probe/Pitot No. 

### 30D- 0 3`') Pitot Coeff. 

### O•$`l Noaie No. 

### 300, 00% Post-Test Pitot <0.1 a •Zj 3 •0 In. H,0 Probe Temp. Setdng ~ 7 

### S Ca_ °/, Moisture 

### S Nozzle Calibration 

### n. 316 0.311 D•st 1 Sample ID No. - 

### 1 1 pl l rbZ C Factor 

### 1.000 Nozzle Diameter O- 311 Observer Filter No. 

### A Start Time 

### oQ 53 End Time 1 0 17 Agencv 

### ^'--
Satnple Point Ciock

Time Drv Gas

Meter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading 0. P In. H 2 O Orif[ce

Setting AH Inches H 2 0 Ideal Actual Dry Gas Meter Temperature'F Inlet Outlet Pump

Vacutun Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F FiIter Box °F Imp. Temp °F 

### q 1 m_C) Y 4 1- 39 o.z.S I. q t•30 by (oD 1•5 54e1 24 51 Iz 

### z. 50• ° I-6 0.Z7 1.40 f. '(0 

# (, 5 5`i 3.0 

### 5 25o 1 `I



### 10 o.zI r.t /. 44 51 3.6 54 7-51 Lf 7. % 15 D•7--7 I.41> 1•40 c,c. 59 3

~ 

### 0 54S ZSI Om Ss .$ o• 7-oo 1.45 1. V7 5 q 3• o S43 24 z, q tr I 57.5( y o.'t% (.45 04 bt G0 

### 3.0 S41 Z.57 y (.0 -Y9•Zo 0.39 2,cc3 2.00 10 0 2.5`1 4
a 1?, (G( • l4 0..5qS 1•4 S I.Q 5 11 3. S 5YT Z52- SU

(e 3-Zo 0:33 1•75 JOS 'I Z (o I 1 3.0 3 1, t, / -s3 1 70 I 0 (04 , 10 o-Zq 1. So 1,75 '7 z 61 3. o y o 2.5(- 50 

### z,o c.c,,(, 0•23 .z.o I.ZO -) 6z t-S 5391 

### zSco 51


## z ZT< c, .ZI 0-z3 I.Zo r.zo 33 i,z 2-5 - 53S Z'55 51

6q. D 0.41 1 

### 2.10 Z.10 ( 1 7 (01 3-5 51 

### 0 25 47 L 'Z .' JJJP9 D. 45 L. 30 L. o 10 1 `/ . 0 '3 Z S 35c7 0•4a t.45 2-41T 1Z (trZ `'F.S Ssc, 247- a



### o.y ~ 

### 2.y5 2. ~ 

### 1 

## 63 • ~ 

## z z
~ ( 

## - Sz 4 0.0 . o Z 0• tf3 Z. Zo 'Z , 2 o "1 [, lo , v S6 Z Zb Z 5 

### (J. l-

~ 

### -.s eb• I1 0• 3q t.00 

### Z•oo 17 64 q o 56 ZLq 55

- 

## 7 4&0 Z.oq o. 3 i-

~ 

## 5 r. s ,c ~ 

## tay 3.s Z5

~ 

## t 5

~ 

### Z3-5 0.3 o 1.5 i. 14 3.v c. ZLo 5j 

### gao 8s.c,

- 7 o. (•too l.(,o 

### 14 63 3 c) 54 Z 5Z 

## to 5Z 5 g7-4 0.5, 11. tel I. ta -? ` 3.0 Sla Z53 Sz S5.0 'beA- zo o.-z co l. 31;
- 74 

### 44 1.0 L. 253 53 IZ.. 51.3 qo.B? d•'ZC. I.35 I.3S 

### y (p4 .c) ~ 

### 3



# o. y3. I o

~ 

### -3`-- /• 7U lep l4CA9 by: 

# ~ Date: 

# ~ Q~ 

### B - 7 ~ ~ TF~~ca~aVlsokfnetic FlelJ Data Slieet - EPA Method 

## z ( +A

Client 7 

### & ?

. 

### , r'Q.141 Uf t(A< Run Number 

### 5 City/State fV \PA 

## t'4 L Date 

### - n 3 - D 3 - 9ib Sampling Loca[ion 

# _P I Operators x~C 

### JPIl ~ Bar. Press.. In. Hg 

### Q . 11 NOMOGRriPff SET-UP LE4K CbfECKS Static Press.. [n. H,0 -0 - ZS c1H rr'y 1.%t,p. Y=I Z0 Av¢. S P D• 33 Pre-Test 0•0 0 3' 3 c 10 In. Hg. Meter Box No. '?no.03S Meter Temp. 10 Ref. c1 P o. 3G Post-Test o• oo L
~ (0 [n. 1{0. Sample Box No. 

### 11 Stack Temp. 5 tl S_ Desired Nozzle 4 - 311 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 cl, 7• z~ 3•

~ (n. H,0 ProbelPitot vo. 

### 200 .O'34 Pitot Coeff: 

### n. gq Nozzle Vo. 

### 300• UO Q, Post-Test Pitot <0.1 a? ~ In. H,0 Probe Temp. Setting 

### 7_5 ('

~ 

### i_ % Moisturz 

### 5 Noale Calibration 

### V• 310 (13 11 0. 31 1 Sample 1D No. 

### ')1 9 I' 0 3 C Factor 

### 0.9 5 1 Noule Diameter • 3 ~ 

### i 1 Observer Filter No. 

### Allt - Statt Time 

### 1 I'I End Time 

### 12 / S Agency 

### ^
Sample Point Clock

Time Drv Gac

Meter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading

~ P In. 14,0 Ori6ce

Setting aH [nches H i 0 Ideal Actual Dry Gas Meter Temperature °F [nlet Outlet Pump

Vacuum Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter Bo

~ c °F Imp. Temp °F 

### 1•9S `? 63 4•c3 535 215 4% Z Z. Qq. ( 0.(41 2• 1 o 2.10 I,S b3 5.o 53 2 5" 4to



### 916. 1 {'% v.yV L•35 2•35 (,9 l, 5.5 53S 251 y 9%.57 0.(13 L•20 2.z0 12 (03 5.0 5 

### 63 2 1 45 

### 5 to0. 0•4 1 

### 2-Id 2.10

- 

### 14 64 1 5.0 SLI" 249 47

lOZ•lo3 p

~ 

### 3 1-45 l•`!S 1 `S 5.0 55 Z

~ 

### {$ 49 " I e,. 0 ID4-5% 0.31 

### 1. (bo I f. bo 1

~ 

### 1 (o I `I •5 

### 558 ?So 1 5 0



### IoZ.3 7 0- 19 l.So I-5 lb S 4 

### ,0 5S5 4q 2o.n ( b$. c,q o.2ib i.y 'f. y 17 •4P V `f- o $53 ZSy 56 t0 Z.

- S I og. 

### 0.2 I. o f. qo 11 4(o L 

### i , a 5 

### ZS 7 51 11 2- 11 1.43 O 

### .Z (•Z5 /. ZS

- 

### 7f 2 l.? 

### 3•5 53 zsl 51

~ 

### z " (IJ•oa 0.2z I.(S 1.157 

### '78 0 •a 53 5 2S8 50 $ I 3on 1 11 t{. 4 p.Z3 I.Zo I. ZO 14 W, 3•0 1 537 56 q9

_ Z- 3L. l I lo A 

## 0.z l, 2o l. 20 15 

## blo 3.0 5 .36 4 

### 3 1 

### 17-41 azy .z /.zS 15 cob 3.o 53g Z55 4 6 1 

### } 1111. 1$ O.ZS i.3o f.3o '14 V S 3.5 53$ 152 t44 -

~ 

### j 40.0 I20.14 O.ZS 1.30 1.30 l (05 3,5 535 Z55 y 4 ' ko 

### Z^ IZZ. 3 3 /. o 

### ) 30

- 

### 77- (04 3.5 555 

### 251. 45 

# 45

. 0 I7-3. 0.3(o 1.97 ).%S l3 ~ 

### 5 q•5 S3to 

### 25(. N` 

### 41-5' l 2im d• 1• Su I. o 14 (o 5 y. 5 5 3'1 ZS 

### G Li 6 a.o IZ7.43 0. ~ 

### f-55 l.

- 

### 7 1 4 IeS 

### 4.0 

### S Z57

~ 

## co y-0 531 Z54 4 $.O (3(.1) 0•Z5 1-'30 1.30 IS lo 3•S 536 Z.9S 4 

### I 13Z, li 

### 0. 29 I.ZS l -7 S 

### Wo 5 

### 3& Z 54 50 t.7tt 33 ,

~ 

## tl•

~ 

## 0.30 ,:: l. s ~ 

### b9

~ 

### 8 ::::::;. ::: 54 . 4

t~ ISe IJI.Y

- 

# a r ~

s• by: Darc: / / / 

### ~ 

# ~ B - 8

## EPA Method 3- Molecular Weight Determination - Data Analysis

Client Name 

### P. 1E 0^rd. $R" CD. Project Number 

### 04L ~ 4 7 

### - I 4 1 City/State 

### N(R D t5oa1 + 1~ 

### C. Sample Date

~ 

### 1 O
~ t rq g Sampling Location

~



### 24C

~ I 

### kac ►I

~ 

### w



### rl Ezsr Operator 

### JDA Sample Type Tedlar Bag ❑ Multipoint ❑ Single Point Fuel Type 

### )

~ 

### JAtORwL 6,eS Analyaer Type 

### Fvrite Serial # 

## 3ov w3 dOxygen Calibration Check Must Be 20.9 ± 0.1% A.rwy;nnr- 

### Trpt 

### No S 5NR*L (A,2. Run # and/or Sample ID 

## ~~~ r S Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) OV S - 0 

## q0

6as:`

; : Re licate I` Re licate 2' Re licate T Averap: Perceut: Multriplier. : Moiecutar WeigLt. Dry Mb mole Actual Net. Actual ` Net Actual Net

~ 

### : ` 3.0 3. 0 3. 0 3. 0 2.g 2.1 2•93

~ 

### = 1. S, S 15.S l5, S I S. g I S. I S. (o D 032

~ 

### {. 49 Zr N2: ; 100 gr, s .: 100 g(, s 100 8,A qI 0.25:
T 

## ° W Z 9. 013

Run # and/or Sample ID 2

~ «I - 0 1 0 Sampling T'tme (24 - Hour Clock) 

# 01 1 ( r' I O S I

; . Re licate l` Re licate 2 Re lic.

~ te 3 ,

~ verage Percentt ` :. Muitiplier Molecniar Weight. D . lii ✓ Ib mote

~ Y Actual 1Vet :.r ~ ctasi Net Actual ° Net 

### ;co,; 2•S 2. S Zle Z.L Z. s 2.S 2.SJ .:::::: l&.v 

### i4.v IS.9 lS.9 (,.0 /G.0 !SQ Uz S(l0 

### N: 1 00 

### lr.s lo0 

### 81•S loo' SLS 81•SO o. 

### as Z2.8Z ~ Total Zq.043

Run # and/or Sample ID ? 

### ~k l~ ~ 7 Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) 

### I 1 VZ - I ZyS

Gas Re itcate I Re licate 2 Re licate 3 Average Percent Multiplier Molecular WeiQLt Drp. [b/Ib mo(e Actuai NeC Actusl Net Actual Net 

### C% 2.$ 2.1 3.0 3: 0 2.7 2.1 2.47 0.44 r. Z(o3

IS 9 Is. 1 Is.r 0.32 5.01.6 

## N. loo i,

~ 

## { Ioo 81 , r 1oo ? 1. 30 0.28 22 .?G Total 

## Zq

. 0q3



# I ited by: 

# ~ Date: 

# ra A " 

### B - 9

# ~ Absorbine Rea ent Blank o•1 14SOCkOm

- rc Rinsing Rea ent Blank ~ Absorbing Blank Identificatiori # 7111 -08 Rinsing Blank Identification # Absorbiniz Rea ent Blank Rinsing Rea ent Blank ~ Absorbin¢ Blank Identification # ~ Rinsin¢ Blank IdentiPtcation # — A nalv st (nitiu Ls J 

### YDA Reviewer liritiaLs

~ It14a : 1 

# / F71.



# iV: I EPA Nlethod 26A 

### -Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis Client Name PI.-JE 4A44 aR><K
~ • Project Number CityiState t4r4Dlso..l , , JC Sample Date d 3 C' 0k q 9 Sampliiig Location $RtU( g,,.4 

### Ex4&vsr - da. 5 RMlrSamples Recovered By J Q Cleari-Up Box Number S Recovery Date Oj a 4 a Chain of Custody: Date Received ~ il ~~ 8 Received By Locked'? 

### Equipment Documentation
Run Number (

~ - 3 Sam le ID Number 71lf -d5 'T 1 91 -o!o r 114 =o ry Sam le Box Number I Z 17, 1Z Probe Number 

### ZW • 0 N 1 7 00. D34 1 Z~ •03y 

### Analysis of Moisture Recovery Rea¢ent Recoverv Container J7111 -05 1 19 1- OC- 719/ --07 Im inser Absorbiniz Solutioll O.l Wi5a .1 Al FIaSO.{ 0.l ^I 14104 Descri tion of Rea ent c4Ca ✓ Rea¢ent Level Marked7 1-1 ✓ Final Volume, ml Z1 S Z1 o Z4S Initial Volume, ml Zao Zad 2ao Net Condensed Volume, ml go S Rea ent Recovetv Container # 71q 1- aS 7191

- oV 1 714
- 0'7 Im in er Absorbing Solution ojjJ /W4 0.1 #J 4&04 0.1 AJ NaDI4 Descri tion of Rea ent Gfo l Rea ent Level Marked? ✓ ✓ ✓ Final Volume, ml I C

- D iol u Initial Volume. ml f e o e0 ieo Net Condensed Volume. ml



# _ O Silica Gel Recoverv Container Percent Silica Gel S eut 2 0 LO 2

~ O Final Wei ht. it 2of•o I-OTA lo 

### q .S Initial Wei ht. g 60.0 2.00.0 200.0 Net Absorbed Water. g S• ~ ~• •S Z'otal Rea¢ent Collected, u O

~ s ~ • 5 

### Sample Reeovery
Recoverv Container '7 i 4 1'°L 7 tt l-°7 Rinsin¢ Solution D ~ u~ w'+VR Dr w ~ D~r~wtk

- L Sam le Container Sealed? ✓ ' ~ Li uid Level Marked? 

### Reagent BlanksIC 2c ~ isokineric Field Dara Sliees - EP,9 .Ylethod ('0A ~aJ~ Client r/. ✓ E Run Vumber 

### / CitviState 

### AJC Date 

### 3 ' bV ' 78 Sampling Location 

### aaKX S A."" % Operators J

~ t JDA Bar. Press.. In. Hg 7 4 

### .S 1 5 Static Press.. In. H•O - 

### e • Z. S
Meter Box No. 100 - 03s Sample Box vo. 11- Probe/Pitot No. Zbo.03 ~ Probe Temp. Setting
~ 5a Sample ID No. ?/' /- o s Filter No. AM &H ~ I . e b4 Y iVteter Temp. 3a Stisck Temp. y7s Pitot Coeff. % ivtoisture C Factor 0. ° ti O S Start Time L) 9,1 S Avg. A P D. ZCP, Pre-Test 6 001 w 1 0 In. Hg. Ref. a P Post-Test • 

### O ") In. Hg. Desired Noale 

### o, 33-1 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 3 . v In. H,0 Nozzle No. 34M-Oq Z Post-Test Pitot <0.1 3. S" In. H,0 Noale Calibracion 0• 3 f 0 0.311 0. 3 11 Nozzle Diameter 

### 6,311 Observer End Time Oy 11 Agency IVOMOGR; lPff SET-UP LF.4X CbfECXS

Sansple Point CIock

Time Drv Gas

Meter Cubic Feet Pitot

Readiag 0. P rn. H2O Oriftce

Setting .:1H Inches H2O Ideal Rctual Drv Gas Meter Temperature °F Inlet Outlet Pump

Vacuum Inches Hg Stack

Temp °F Filter Box °F Imp. i Temp °F I 

### R/ o.o 1 P4 . 60 0.30 1.4% I.SO yZ 41 H.0 `24 y 1 Z 2.S 34 , z 0 o. 1.e5 I.

~ 

### os y4 41 4•5 25d y1 3 S.o t

~ 

## n . $S l.tou 1.b0 yS

~ 

### }1 253 `Iv

A 

### l

~ 

### .5 t39. 1 0• ~ I. 

## S ~ 

### I..

~ 

### '1 4z

. 0 Z 4Z 

### /o• o I.2y ,34 8 I. 

## ' ig 4 5•c ~ 

### IS 1 5 `i3 G 2 • 5 

### 142 .ti o- 3 u 1 . 4 8 l. 50 

### 50 43 5. o 4 9,7

. 

### 1w 44 . /5 o I 2 o.Z5 I.ZI r.zo 51 43 40 4 Z /7•5 14to- 11 o.ZZ r. ola 1.10 S'Z 1 

### (43 4.0

- 

### Y85 2.4 9 Zo , o 14 *1. 5 O-Zi 11. 0 S I, of SZ 43 3. 5 49.5 25 t 

### 4to 

### io zZ 

### .5 5. o. - zl .c,S 53 4 1 4 'j• 5 2S

- 7 y 

### i/ zs,o r5o•3z, ai o.
~ 

### 3 0.$3 C,4 (45 3•0 4 L,5 ts 4
- 7 12 z?.5 j51.

~ 

### 01 0.1 0•%3 WaZ 54 y S 5• 0 ,C3 i 

### 30.0 15 7 -84 0. 0.$8 0.hl 3.0 4cDo I z4S 4 ~ 

### Z 3z. S 154.1S 0-ij b. oo 0.916 54 4l. 3-0 % 1 5 ZSZ 4to 3 35.0 159.43 0•19 0.93 0.9 54 4b 3.0 41, tSo y5 

### 3

- 7.6 - 1S4•79 0.19 6•93 0. 5 q(* .0 4

- 70 .245 45 5 yb.o 

### 1`b. D.i° ~ 

### 6.13 0 -CF5 Sb 41 3.0 4 t5$ 4

~ 

### 1S 

### .145 6•21 t.65 !.0

5 

### 5(• y 3.S 46-1 7.55 yb ys • o Ic.o. 5 6-31 !. 5 6 51 4 5.0 41.3 Z 1 5L 48 8 IV7.5' IWz•Sb 6.10 1.4% 1.50 5S 4S •0 4 wo Z53

~ 

### t 

### 9 So.a 11,4. i o.Z"1 .35 I•3 59 

# 9 9 y 24 0 io 

### z 5 c,
. ~ 

### O.z.s 1.zr 1•i.c, 9 y9 y•0 4 y 15 o SS.o 1 67.20

o Ca.4 1.15 I• I S 5 4 4•v μ y ZS 5 ~ 

### 12- S7.5 r03.Z S 6 

### ,7.4 I.tS 1•15 c. 45 yo 473 2so 5

if 

# :; ;
. 3 •~ 

### o. Z 

# " 1.22. ; • _ : ::

~ 

# . Audited by: kc- Date: I,a Ia.It

en 

# ~ 

# ~Isokineric Field Dara Sheer - EP.a .Vlerhod 

### Z(c , #

Client / I

~ /E 'q ~- B~/~ C~ Run Vumb Z Citv/State / %4O",S ~ . A/ C Date 3 - W ' /8 Samplin¢ Location B'' ~K'~ K'e.

~ /

~ 's

~ AelSr ~ iY

~ • SAAWT Operators 

### .)?k AM
Bar. Press.. [n. Hg 

### ZI • 51 NOMOG&IPH SET-UP LF.rIK CFIECXS Static Press.. In. H 2 O



## - y ' ~ 5 ,i-I ia 

### 1.4.e Y= 1 

### •U 0 Avg. A P 

### O. ZS Pre-Test 

### a• n Uy g 

## _( t) (n. Hg. Meter Box No. 

## ~ W -03S Meter Temp. 

### S S Ref. .A P 

### n. 37 Post-Test 

### d• 00 Z 'F-v



### _ r 1_[n. He.. Sample Box No. I 

### Z- Stack Temp. 

### 47 < Desired Noale 

### 0.343 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 g 1.Z y 3 , o [n. H,0 ProbeuPitot vo. ?.c4.M 4

4 Pitot Coeff. O. ~~ Noale No. 0 9 L Post-Test Pitot <0.1 Fv 'l•5 3. 5 (n. H,0 Probe Temp. Setting 2 s y % Moistute 'a Nozzie Calibration 6. 11 0 o.
- m 1 Sample ID No. 

### ? i 9 1-

a° C Factor C) •9 14 Noale Diameter Observer Filter No. '#*/*+ Start Time O et 4 Sa End Time 1051 Agency
Sample Point Ctock

Tlate Dry Gas

Meter Cubic Feet Pitot

Reading O.P in. H2O Orifice

Setting SH Inches H2O Ideal Actual Dry Gas Meter Temperazure'F Inlet Outlet Pump

\lacuum Inches Hg Stack

Terttp °F Filter Box °F Imp. 

# ~ Temp 'F ` I 

### 0.0 11 .u1 o.'3'1 1. A/ 1. ( 35 5 '7 3• L) 411 25z 

### Z 2.5 177

- 

### `61 .~ 

### (o I•V 1,8t S ~ 

### 3. o gio ZS ~ 

### .3 S.o n .40 1.9S .qS Sto q qqy ZSN Z Y 7. 5 r17(,.5 3 o, Yo IAs I.qS 

### SY q s yaS 7_S3 q Z S 1 /o.o h, 1•`b'f 1. 0 65 GO I 5O 3.5 4°10 2S% 43 12.5 1 0

00•Zz o. 35 : 7' G t

~ 

### Z S 1 3.5 485 z 4 

# 4

. I,S• 0 1 Z. o cD O : Z•8 . 3 l. y-o 5 ° b So Zlo 0 17•,T .2.io 2 1.30 57 50 Cf 

### 9 Zo.o IR>S.Z' ~ 

### o.'ZS 1 .z s1 z(-o `Il4 o zz .5 18 75 b.Z3 . z 1.10 55 Sl Z• 47S' 2cEo 45 i/ 25.0 1$S.z4 0Z'1. I.oB l.lo r Z• 4(ol 14 0 45 

### /2 z7. 5 1 . 70 b -ZZ. 1.os Oo 54 51 1 P(P v L3 / 30.0 151 .15 0.2) J.c 2 l.oa 5► 

### 5 z5U


### z 32 . S 197. S S 

### o• z.2 l. o SG 51 z. 4 'L5 b 44 3 35-a 193.9 o. !•!Z 

### l.lo 5
- 7 51 2•5 4 9 Zoo 

### 37. s I 0 1. 6 .Z'L 11,09 00 9 51 2. 493 4 S S Ald. 0 91.• .2.3 I. IZ l.

~ 

### 0 59 5Z 2•5 49 t5Z

~ 

### Y2.6 1 a .z O•? 3 1. 51 7.5 941!5' 25 4t. y6 • o• 199 .7y .3 Z 1 5 8 l. 4oO lo 0 

### Sl 

### 3.0 7-53 L4 b 8 1 

### l7.5' toi.5 0.3 1.1 < -'K 53 3.0 '-19(o Zc*o La 

### 9 So.o zo3.Z1 0•30 1.49 .5o b( S 3.0 450 z55 4 b /~ 

### 2 5 d ~• ~ V.u



### . i•z. ~ 

### 1• LoZ 53 10 4a6 Z S`1 41 

### 55.0 Zo q 

### 0.21 /. O //v 6 2•5 

### 4,) ZS 

### f so / 

### L 57.5 zJl• 

### 0.21 11. oz /. O0 cDZ- 1;3 

### 2. 4

- 1 S Ztoo o 

### &0•0 z(>k , z5 S

: 

### 38 Z.Z o.z8

~ 

### •38 . : )se 91.7 iudited toq: Pf '-- Date: 

## 3, 1 1" 

# QA B-12 

# E7!

ArJi lsokinetic Field Data Slreet - EP.-1 .f ✓ lethod 

### 2 (a ,4 Client F

, -/E H'a•- E7o'.A. - Run vumber 3 citvistate //4oisCA/,

~ lC D ate 3 -

~ , b - /8 SamplingLocation B~K'~ .K~u ✓ EX~A~ ST -/Y

~ • s l ~~r Operators ~ P1L 10A Bar. Press.. In. Hg •



### Z4 

### 55 NOMOGI?APhf SET-UP LF11X CNECKS Static Press.. In. H : O 'o' LS OFi ;-,3 ~ . ~ eL Y b V Avg. ~ P ~ Z~ Pre-Test U.00Z 

# w In. H;. Meter Box Yo. ~ °' V3

~

' MeterTemp. Ll7 Ref. a , P y ' 3 7 Post-Test 0-oD Z ' IF,, 2 In. Hg. Sample Box No. 1 Z Stack Temp. 4 95 Desired Noale 0 • 

### 333 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 r 7P

. , C' In. H,0 ProbeuPitot Yo. 2eO - 0 34 Pitot Coeff: 0• S u Noale No. 3c70.U4? Post-Test Pitot <0.1 S') In. H : 0 Probe Temp. Setting I Se) % Moisture 9+ Noale Calibration O. ; 1 t7 0. 3 0 O. 3 1 Sample ID No. ?l91 ' 0 7 C Factor 41 2-3 Noale Diameter 

### o. 311 Observer FiIter No. 4JA- Start Time Il D L End Time Agencv Dry Gas Pitot Orifice Drv Gas Pump Stack Filter [mp. Sarnple Ciock Meter p Reading Setting .1H Meter Yacuum Temp Box Temp Point Time Cubic Feet & P Inches H2O Tempenture °F Inches °F °F °F in. H 2 O Ideal Actual Inlet Outlet Hg 

### A / 0



### . 0 Z0q. 1 44 0.20 6.19 6, 

### sci Slo 

### D 46 4 25 y(c Z 2.5' 110.1 o•zz- r-og 1.10 Si s 4 q 3 5.c 1. Z3 6.Z3 ).,Z 1.10 S5 SZ 3.5 41 Z.

~ 7. 5 1 3.c, 9 b.

- t 1 I. o

- t. 1.00 y S1 .Z 4 Z54 43 

### S /o. o ZiS.eto o.Z,'z 1.046 1.10 l.z. S4 3.5 y 

### 1105 4te 

### G 12 • 5 L AtA 0•2A .1'1 120 LZ 53 4.o 14q tSS 

### 4~ 

### ISo 21 ta.oz 0•33 I APS 1. G5 43 54 S•U UAA 2

- 

### V0 4 

## is 17•S' ZI°k.'7S o 3y I.ea 1.70 (*q 54 S•S Lir, I z5q

Lt1.53 

### f. S I. 1,4 5 .0

~ 

### - 4 la 153 49

.n 7•1 S 77 , %.7r_ A'Ly c 11 1 1_7 Ley CLl I Q 1-1 44,[7 Z53 SO 

### ~ Z 5. 0 1 27-4 . Z I o Z,Z I 1. O$ o 14.0 4l1 V41 I ~ Z 27.5 L2to .30 0•Z ( . oZ , 00 L.

. y Z.SZ. e .3

~ 

### .!3 3o.0 17-7. 0•35 1.75 - 1.7 16 SV 5.6 yIlo I ISS6 5 1 

### Z 3L.S zzq.49 0•34 1.t8 130 We S -a 4"71 7-93 1 5 7 1 

### 3 36.0 31 . Z 0. % . 8 1,90 

### b*7 5 7 .v ! q 7'1 1 Z(eo 

### 51 37. s . Jz o• 38 /. S 7 1• 9 0 6 9 8 G. o 47 8 

### 5 A/d.o Z. "a. . S 1.S G 

### 57 6.0 41Z v 6 .S 2.8 0.33 1. 6!; ), 

### 65 7 We 58 47t, zt o l S '/s' o'. z3$.coz 619 6 1 .qo 

### 0 0 4- 4 S7 S:o 473 S'y S lf 

### 8 4l7. S" tyo• 37 0 .- Zgr 

### I.zl I. 7 c3 ~ 

### 489 

### U.z 55 9 So.o Z41. y 6.2y ).n 

### 120 W 59 L4 10 q g Ztoz 55 

### ia 

## i 5 zU?. 37 0.V4 1.11 1. Zo (1 S IPo 1 4. 0 qW Z 59 S 55 • c 7-y4.8 0.7.3 1.1z 

### l.lo (o5' 1,0 4. 0 4 71 759 54 

### i2 

### 57.5 2.4c..4' ~ 6 

### A3 1.17- D y o 47 

### Z59 55

~ 

### • o Z

~ 

### { 8 S .( ~

, ~ 

## s. 0.Z1

~ 

## .3c ~ 

## s :: `Ig

~ ' 

## O

A ~ udited by: N `•
~ Date:
Q ~ 

### g-1J ~ Q

### APPENDIX C

LABORATORY DATA

C-1 !

# Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 6200 Harris Technology Blvd. Charlotte, NC 28269 

# Pine Hall Brick (046-97-191) 

# Analytical Report (0398-05/19)



# EPA Method 26A Hydrogen chloride Hydrogen fluoride

.~ 

# Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 3211 Bramer Drive Raleigh, IVC 27604 919/550-4392



# c? /-d

# i Summary of Res-u

, 

# lts i

I

~ 

# _;
~~~. ComPat

~ y: ; ; Aaal)ist;': Fasaiaetets :

, , # 5am Ies'. Tri on/Pine Hall Brick :> Client:#:: ;;:: Eiithaipyl.

~ ..

PO #: >:::.: ... . . . . ,.... R it MWI 046-97-191 BGH 0398-05/19 HCI. HF AM 772?/7728 8 03/ 19/98 If



## eo; ~ 

## a '`fi
~ <:;:<: :::> ''.: `:'.::;;:.. '. :' ::``':::;:.::::;' .:: ..... .:;': 

## mtc8 ~ ~ < .

Pink Paver Bricks 7191.01 7191-02 7191-03 7191-04 Hydrogen Fluoride 93,940 108,740 87,814 < 163 Hydrogen Chloride 21,513 23,119 22,401 < 163

Red Paver Bricks 7191-09 7191-08 7191-07 7191-08 Hydrogen Fluoride 61,502 64,459 79,450 < 225 Hydrogen Chloride 15,109 16,797 18,455 < 225

Reviewed by: 

# 04 A QA: Ste J. Eckard

Anatyst: lt- 

# i

~ ,—

Bruce G. Hawks Date: L ~

Date:

/ .

p -- --- - ~ . ~ ., ~e:~ 1:VOB598V03%0396-0SW398-05.W82 13:40 03/20 ~ v

# Results

,

. 

# ~ C



# _ 5 F ~t ~~ ~ . ... .-,.. _ _ 1- Z~



# m

Y 0~

. b G:



## E e E 

# = a c G 0 s „ ~ N

rl O ~ Q
L

~ y R ~ ~ u

p Z U V r Z U `

~ C T U

~

~

~ 

# I F 

# Z W .~ y .. I ~



# = 

# E m 

# „~`~

zL

~ . r i N-

~ 

# ? ^ Y 3 0

~

~

~ ~



# aR;

~

~ 

# ...

L

C 

### c e

~ 

### . a c
M
N ~

a °



### m c n

z

~ U r
L

i~ U
T ~ + ~Y

~

~ 

### L

} 

## J 

# Q

_ F~ 

## Z W



# ~~

. 

## , s 0 ~' ~ L 

### 210 

### Di■

zm~ 1

I 

# ,_, tv 0

# Narrative Summary

I. 

## c_s 

## ~~

## Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary

Com 'any:;:. Tri on/Pine Hall Brick Cliestt*;:: 046-97-191 Pf} # AM-7722/7728 03 98-05/ 19 "ai 

# I
.T.2rameterl: BGH

. HCI. HF The first lot of samples was received on 03/04/98 and the second lot was received on 03/ 10/98 by Scott Grosshandler after being relinquished by Paul Jenkins of Trigon Engineering. Samples were cold upon arrival and kept cold during storage. Prior to and during analysis they were kept under lock with access only to authorized personnel of Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. The samples were analyzed for hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen chloride (HCl) according to the procedures outlined in the EPA Method 26A. Quantitation was performed with a Hewlett Packard series 1100 High Performance Liquid Chrornatograph with a Waters 430 conductivity detector. Separation was accomplished by a Hamilton PRP-X100 150 mm s 4.1 mm anion exchange column using 2 mM sodium benzoate pH 6.4 as the eluent at 1.5 mL per minute. The samples exhibited peak broadening of the HF and HCl peaks. C 18 and barium sulfate removal solid phase extraction of the samples did not remove the cause of the peak broadening. Sample 7191-01 HF concentration was confirmed by ISE analysis. Before and after sample analysis, a six point calibration curve was prepared and analyzed. The linearity coefficients of the HF curve and the HCl curve were 0.9996 and 0.9995, respectively. The following table shows approximate retention times for each analyte. Analvte Retention rtme Hydrogen fluoride .......................................4.30 Hydrogen cliloride .......................................5.25 

### OK OK 

## em, MDL — Minimum Detection Liniit. LOQ — Limit of Quantitation.



# ~ C-9 0398-05.doc

~ ~

# Sample Custody

1w,, 

# X f/-,\<

, jj

~ . a

\• v ~•~ a~

ti \

~ • .:.

~ :. ~ 

## y = Q ~:~ .~ .:.. \ 

## z u •

~~ ., . ~

C Z
d5' r 4 1 [

~ \

~
.

. ~; ~ ~ z ~ 

### , r •;

~

~ 

### y

~ ~` ~ C

_ ~'

- _ •

~ o ~ V

~ r a. ~.~ ~J~

- ~ ~

~ ~ \ ~

~ ` O -. ` ~ ~~ •.'

~ ... Gi^ .ri ..

~r 10

~ ' ' •

~ :. L

~ :. +' ~ ~ . ° f'. ;,• i► C

3~

. ? 2 iy ~ •~ tr' • C~ ~ ~, ~ — ~ • y ~ y

. 

### oO. C ~ = GC ~ •~ • 

## ° E
~ ~ ~ `• ~ 3 

# r,--t _

/. C\

V

... ..

4

.

1 ~
1 C

~ ~ H +r

~ o ~ ~..► 

## _ m m ~
'~~:~~ ' ~ > ~

5 C ~

~ :' A
~ l::. : .~ ~ v ~ ' \ • ~ . : Vi ~ ,:- •

L , ~ i O .,, .."; ~L.. :. ~ \ u ~♦ /
Q+• ra i bc ~ - ~ -

~ ~ ~ 'r ~~~: ~ ~• ^ ~ . J \

- .. ~ . 'V

~ ~ .r .'

~ .:. ~ .: ~ ' ~ :. 7

, ►-♦ - _ - O

6. 

## E E 1

cc cc



### C: ..:., v

~ : , A` • ~ `, b L * '". ~ r~ C C — e. ~ .

:> ~ ~ _ •-
~. 

# :: w

~ ~, ~ ~ •~; ~~~ ~~ ~ --



### ~ ~ ~ t

~ c - 12

, ~~

# Sam'ple

.



# Chromatograms

.~
~ r_i; ,7 ,

## = ~ i.e c : \,HPC::=M\,3\DATA'` \ 1998DATA\im.AR_98\0398-OSA\006-1101.D 7191

- 01 *_;

7 

### inal voume = 500 ml
"zject_,n Date : 12-Mar-98, 18:13:32 Seq. Line -------------------



### : 11 Sample :;ame 7191-01 *11 Vial 6 ?.cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analysis of an'_or.s Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A1006-1101.0) 

### uS II ~

~ U

Q 601.719

kn rea: 185.515

0 1 2 3 a 5 min



### External Standard Report
5orted 3y Signal Calib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 P.M Mu?ti iolier 1.0000 :Dilution 1.0000 3ignal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [mi n] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.305 MF 601.71924 2.77607e-2 16.70413 Hydrogen F? , -or=de 5.254 FM 185.51534 1.96144e-2 3.63877 Hydrogen Chloride Totals : 20.34290 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C - 1 4

### a_a F;le F:\ ,HPC:EM\3\DATA\1998DATA\;m-AR_98\0398-05A\006-1201.D

Final voume = 500 ml

--------------- 

### 'nject=on Date .SamDle Name Acq_ Operator Acq. Method Analysis Method Last changed lnalysis

~ 

### of ani( : 12-Mar-98, 18:20:02 : 7191-01 *11 

### : BGH : HFQ-NEXT.M : F:\ ?iPCHEM\3\METHODS\03 : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 

### Dns Ion by Waters 430 IC Seq. Line 12 Vial 6 Inj i 98-05A.M BGH - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-OSA',006-1201.0) uS v „

_ ~ a o ~

4 g?%ce,a: 632.362 -5 _ \ TgArea: 214 703

~ a ~ x N Q ;(j 

## N
/ /

~
~

I ~

I i0 —

0—
0 1 2 3 4 5 min

-------------------- 

### External Standard Report S o rt ed 3y S ignal 

### Calib. Data Modified Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM mult iDlier 1.0000

~ 

### iluticn

. 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC Ret'I'ime 

### Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s; [ug/ml] 

# ---- -I------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.384 MF 632.36176 2.76044e-2 17.45595 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.248 FM 214.70261 1.94872e-2 4.18396 Hydrogen Chloride '^otals 21.63991 

### Results obtained with enhanced intzgrator! *** End of Report ***

C-l5 

## ~~ 30 —

00 —

a0 — FA'~H~C :~ NI\3'' DA

~ 'z`

~ ,,998DATA\

~ LkR 98\0398-OSr

~ ,\007-1:sO1 .D 

### 5'inal voume = 500 ml


### 'njection Dace 12-Mar-98, 18:26:34 Seq. Line 13 ample Name : 7191-02 *11 Vial : 7 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Accq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M inal_vsis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M Lasc changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

AOC1 A, Water 430 1C (0398-05A1007-1301.0) uS _ a a

- ~ o` L

- ~

~ a U c y a 

# - 80 - '

_ ~ 

# 39

~ 

# 4 Area: 2 1 -7 :68

s


### Ex*_ernal Standard Report
Sorzed By Signal Cal i b. Da•ta Modi f ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10 : 27 : 32 P.M 

### mu'_ciplier. 1.0000 Dilucion 1.0000 Sigr.al 1: ADC1 A, Wacer 430 IC RecT_me Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s]

---- 

### [ug/ml]

------- 

### ~ ------ 

### ~ ----------i------ 

### ~ ---------- 

### ~ -- 

### ~ ------------------ 

### 4.386 MF 707.69446 2.72777e-2 19.30427 Hydrogen 5.242 FM 237.06790 1.94110e-2 4.60172 Hydrogen Chloridz Totals : 23.90599 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

### *** End of Report ***

C - 16 / .rl .. 'I /, n /nn , ., -.. .... — .,..,'zza =,-e F :\.

- -;.PCH`.M\3\L,ATA\1998DA'`A\`vIAR_98\0398-05A\007-140i.D 

### _S---U2 °-_ 

### F:nal voume = 500 ml


### njectiori Date 12-Mar-98, 18:33:08 Seq. Line 14 ,,ample Name : 7191-02 *11 Vial : 7 Acq. Operator BGH Inj 1

~ 

### CQ. Merhod : :?FL-NEXT.M Ar_alysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH A.r of an=ons Ion by Wacers 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADC1 a, `Nater 430 IC k 0398-05A1G07-1401.0) ,S

~ 

### s

v L
ao -

ti
60 -

/
- 1 I
40 -

20 -

0-
0 1 2 3 4 5 rnrt



### External Standard Report

j0rred 

### By Signal Calib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM mu1 ti pli er. 1.0000

~ 

### :Dilution 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC

~ 

### RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] (uS*s'] (ug/ml] 

# ~ ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.383 BV 716 09204 2 72455e-2 19 51031 Hydrogen Fluor_de 5.218 VB 194.42979 1.95715e-2 3.80528 Hydrogen Chloride Totals 23.31559 

### Resslts obtained with enhanced integrator!

~ 

### *** End of Report *** C-17 

# ~

### ..:\nPCLEM\3\.Z)ATA\1998DATA\NLA2_98\0398-05A\008-1501.D ;_ ~~ 

### -q;

= ~ 

### na1 voume = 520 ml

' Injection Date 12-Mar-98, 18 58 31 Seq Line 15 Sample Name : 7191-03 *11 Vial : 8
~ 

### acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M ' Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH

~ 

### nalysis of anions .Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr.

AOC1 A, 'Nater ,1 '30 iC ;0398-05A\008-1501.0) ' us

1 ( ~

- C

~ • ~ ~ O ~ O 5 30. 905 ~ 30 — =Area: 196.889

C ~ 1

~ i I !
a0 —


# ~ = ~

z0 _

0- 

# 1 0 1 3 4 G Tin


### External Standa=d Report

l Sorted Bv

. Signal Calib. Data Modi==ed Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Multi
~ 

### lier 

# 1 Dilution 1.0000
: 

### 1.0000 Sig:Zal 1: ADC1 A, 

### Water 430 IC 

# ~ RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name (minJ

- ------ 

## ~

------ 

## ~

----------



### (uS*sJ (ug/mlJ

------------------ 

## ~ 4.395 MF 530.90540 

# I

---------- 

### 2.81909e-2 

# I

----------



### 14.96669 Hydrogen Fluor'-de 5.253 FM 196.88921 1.95603e-2 3.85122 Hydrogen Chloride

, Totals : 18.81791 

### Results obtair_ed with enhanced integrator!

--------------------------------- 

# ~ *** End of Report ***



### ~ C - 18 

### ~~~a~ 

### a c'__e F:\HPC :EM\3\DATA\1998DATP.\MAr2_98\0398-05A\008-1o'01.D 

# 03 =y-

~ 

### :;'inal voume = 520 ml



# _____________________________________________________________________ Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 19:05:04 Seq. Line : 16 Samo1e Name : 7191-03 *11 Vial : 8 A 

### cq_ Operator BGH Inj 1

~ 

### cq. Method 'rIFQ-NEXT.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1

~ 

### olumn

ADC1 ,i, Water 430 IC (0398-0SA\008-1601.0) uS
- 0

~ 3

-

~ U

rea: 203.0 , 19 

### N

Q N 7 y ~ " I i 60 ;

_ I

s0 — r

. j

. I 20 —

0-
0 1 2 i 1 5 min

---------- ------------ 

### External Standard Report
Sorted By Signal Ca1ib. Data Modif ied Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name (minl [uS * s l [ug/m1 l



# -- 4 I ---- I I I -- I--I 412 MF 56231647 279867e-2 1573737 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.248 FM 203.84894 1.95303e-2 3.98122 Hydrogen Chloride 

# I Totals : 19.71859 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator!

----------------------- 

### *** End of Report *** C - 19 

## ~~a -_le F:\. :PCHEM\3\,DATA

~ ,1998DALA\ ~ 98\0398

- OSa\OC9-1701.D 

### F-na1 voume = 450 ml
:jection Date 12-Mar-98, 19:11:34 Seq Line 17 5ample Name : 7191-05 *11 Vial : 9 

### Acq. Operator BGH Inj 1 icq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M Analysis Method : F:\HPC 'iEM\3\METHODS` \ 0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 coiumn

AQC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\009-1 7 101.0)
us

~ —

~ U

. c c 61 y a ~ ' ~ O C j

~~ ~ 06.921 

### 5 ^ a c ~=~1 

### rea: 1 o._C.,

Q N 

### 60 —

. ~

40 —

20 

### _

0—
F 1 5



### Ex=

- =rna1 Standard Report
Scrted By Signal Ca'_ib. Data Modified Friday, Mu lier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM

2etTime Type Area Amt/Area Amounc Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/m2] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.481 MF 406.92102 2.93047e-2 11.92469 Hydrogen F1uc==de 5.208 FM 156.80457 1.97856e-2 3.10248 Hydrogen Chloride ?'otals : 15.02716 Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C - ?0

### 'aca =i1e =:\HPC 1 EM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\009-1801.D 7191-05 ;:= 

### Final voume = 450 ml
Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 19:18:07 Seq. Line : 18 Sample Name : 7191-05 *11 Via1 : 9 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Acq. Methcd : HFL-NEXT.M Analysis Method : r^:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

### Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analysis of anions T_on by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-OSA\009-1801.0) U.5

~
~ 

### U C a a

0 80 -

. ~ Q v,

~

40 - I

20 - I i

- ~

~ ~ I 0-

~ 3 4

----------------------- 

### External Standard Repor*_

' Sorted By Calib. Data Modified 

# ~ Multiplie= Dilut=on Signal Fr=day, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 1.0000 1.0000 

### Signai 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name (min] [uS*s] (ug/ml] 

# I ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--I------------ ------ 4.480 PV 447.67093 2.88705e-2 12.92450 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.184 VB 151.43234 1.98249e-2 3.00213 Hydrogen Chloride 

# 1

. :otals :


# ~ Results obtained with enhanced integrator!

-------------------- 

### *** End of Report

: ('_It 

### 15.92663F :',:?PCa=M\,3\DATA\1998LATA\M.r

~ R_98\0398-05r3\010-1901.D 7131-06 *11 

### Final voume = 450 ml
njection Dace 12-Mar-98, 19:43:19 Seq Line 19

. ~ 

### ample Name : 7191-06 *11 Vial : 10 acq. Operator : BGH Inj acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M Analysis MeLhod : F:\HPC :•iEM\3\METH0DS\0398-05A.M

~ 

### asc char_ged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM b_v BGH .Azialysis of an=ons ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr:

ADC1 A,'Nater4301C (0398-05AZ10-1901.0) uS

~ +- U



## _ _ e

30 —

~ ''' • . r 451. J37

' ~ Q N

~ I

20 —

J— .77079

0 1 2 3 4 5 rnin



### EXLernal Standard Recort
Sor`zd By Signal Ca'-ib. Data Mcdi=ied . Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM

~ 

### Iul_

~ 

### blier 1.0000 Di_uZion 1.0000 Sicnal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC
Rec 7 ime TypeAr:a Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [minJ [uS*s] [ug/ml]

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- ------------------ 

### 4.477 Mr^ 451.03732 2.88382e-2 13.00710 Hydrogen Fluori::e 5.244 FM 177.07924 1.96589e-2 3.48119 Hydrogen Chloride "'ica? s : 16.48828 

### Rzsults obtained wich enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C - 12 ~~ -'-A:i' =:93ZA'='A ,XA-R 9 S ,J393

- 05A\010-200

- ' 

### . -r.al voume = 450 ml


### Injection Date 12-Mar-98, 19:50:04 Seq Line 20 3mple , Name : 7191-06 *11 Vial : 10
.- ~ 

### cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Acq . Method

- r_5'Q-NEXT . M 

### Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADC1 a, 'Nater a30 IC ;0398-OSA',010-2001.D) uS II ~ a` 3
Cf y O j 7 j

'~ 2 ~`~~ rea: 167.64

~ 

### N

60 —

40 —

20 —

0—
0 1 2 3 min



### External Standa=d Report
Sorted By Signa? Calib. Data Mod=f_ed Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilut ion i.0000 

### Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime T•ype Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] (uS*s] (ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.485 MF 452.25372 2.88266e-2 13.03694 Hydrogen Fluor=de 5.234 FM 167.66374 1.97140e-2 3.30532 Hydrogen Chlor=de Totals : 16.34226 

### .,esults obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C '-3) I v 1
- T - ncz . 1
- 2 nn,r nw

## i r

i 60 –

20 -

0- Q N \F-iPCHEM`,-

~ \Da:'A\1998DaI'A\:

~ R_98\0398-O5A\011-2101 .D

-:.--:' -'- ,-. 

### rinal voume = 450 ml
:njectior_ Date : 12-Mar-98, 19:56:35 Seq. Line ------------- 

### : 21 

### SamDle Name 7191-07 *11 Vial 11 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

### ?_cq. Method HFQ-SAME.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH ; Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column
A. Water 430 IC (0398-05A\011-2101.0) 

# I

– AOC1

uS

t J

:~ f O 7 J a: 5 85

. 983 — i?

~ ,Area:

0 1 2 3 4 5 mirt



### External Standard Reoort

' Sorted By Ca'_ib. Data Modif_ed 

# ~ Multiplier : 

### ution S icxnal 

### Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 1.0000 

### 1.0000 

### Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name (min] [uS*s] [ug/ml]



# ------- ~ 

# ------ ~ 

# ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.468 MF 585.98267 2.78473e-2 16.31803 Hydrogen Fluor=de 5.221 FM 200.01706 1.95466e-2 3.90965 Hydrogen Chloride
; "otals : 20.22767 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator!

- ----------- 

### *** End of Report *** C 24 

## ~~:az3 F _:e F: \HPCFiEM\3\DA'I-'-%\1998DATA\im.r'1R_98\0398-05A\011-2201 .D 7191-07 --- 

### Fl-nal voume = 450 ml
injection Datz : 12-Mar-98, 20:03:05 Seq. ----------------------



### Line : 22 Sample Name : 7191-07 *11 Viai : 11 i Acq. Otierator : BGH Inj : 1 yccr . Mechod : HFL-NEX"' . M 

### Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M Lasc char_ged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

# ~ Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-05A\01 1-2201. 0) 

# ~ uS 

### o '

LL U

~ a 0 a0 _ 

### ~ ~ cea: So' 

### ~a~ rea: ' 80.589

60 — ( 

### ~ I ~ i

, • i

40 — 1

.

20 -

0-
0 1 2 3 4 5 mirt

--------- 

### External Standard Re

- corz Sor_ed 3y Signal _ali5. Daca Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM mul`:t1'er 1.0000 

### Dilut=on 1.0000 Signal -. ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime 'I'ype Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name (min] (uS*s1 [ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--I------------------ 4.479 MF 564.18066 2.79753e-2 15.78311 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.198 FM 180.58949 1.96399e-2 3.54676 Hydrogen Chloride "otals 19.32986 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C 25 

## ~~

### :_le F:\HPCHEM\3\DATA\19981DATP.\MAR_98\0398-05A\017-3301.D

-P;-n.al voume = 325 ml

---------------- 

### :n j ection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:33:40 Seq. Line : 33 Sample Name : 7191-04 Vial : i7 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sea , uencz File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M rast changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH• Analysis oi anions Ion by Wat=_s 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADC1 A. 'Nacer 430 IC (0398-05A\017-3301.0) uS '

0- —
0 1 2 3 4 - 'nrrt



### External Standard ReDort 

# -------------------=------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- Sorted By . Signal Cal_b'. Data Modified Fridav, Ma=ch 13, 1998 10:27:32 P1M multioli er 1.0000 

### Dilution 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

### R?t'I'ime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/m1) 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.208 - - - Hydrogen Fluoride 5.231 - - - Hydrogen Chloride

~ 

### otals : 0.00000 Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 1 Warnings or Errors : C-26

### :a_a File r:\NPC ?:EM\3\DATA\19981DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\017-3401.D 7191-c



### =inal voume = 325 ml

---------------------- 

### Inj2ction Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:40:12 Seq. Line : 34 Sampl-- Name : 7191-04 Vial : 17 Acq. Operator BGH Inj 1 

### Secuence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M

, ~ 

### .nalvsis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analvsis of anior_s Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRD-x100 150x4.1 columr_

AOC1 A, 'Nater 430 IC (0398-05AQ17-3401.0) us

J 1 2 3 4 5 rnin

. 

### External Standard Report
Sorted By. Signal Calib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilut'_on 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--I-------------

--- -- 4.208 - - - Hydrogen Fluoride 5.231 - - - Hydrogen Chloride Totals : 

## • ••••• Results obtained with enhanced integrator! ~ 

### 1 Warnings or Errors :

f , ~ 

## 17

### DA'=' ~`~ 

### -998D

~ 

### _ `_\NI ~ 

### 98 0398-05 ~ 

### 018-350' . ~ L J 

### ? 4 Lnal voume = 450 ml

------------ 

### njection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:46:43 Seq. Line : 35 3ample Name : 7191-08 Vial : 1n Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 sequence File : F:\HPCuEM\3\SEQUENC--

~ 

### \1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-SP.ME.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\ME 7

- ':iODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 3GH Analvs_s of ar._or_s Ion by 

### Waters 430 iC - PRP-x100 150x4 .? column

AOC1 A, `Nater 430 IC ;0398-05A\018-3501.0) 

### us i

- ~ 80 - 

### v a

. N • \ ~

40 —

20 —

0—

a 5 rin


### External Star_dard Reoort


### Sorted By Signal Calib'. Data Modi

- ; 2 .ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM mul tiplier 1.0000 

### 'ilution 1.0000 Sigr_al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Ar?a Amt/Area Amcunt Grp Name [min] [uS*sl (ug/ml]



# ------- ~ 

# ------ ~ 

# ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.208 - - - Hydrogen Fluoride 5.231 - - - Hydrogen Chlor=de .`otals 

# • ••••• Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 1 Warnings or Errors : C-28 A(1

# 1
- aca File F:\ '

ciPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\018-3601.D 779:-

~ 

### ; Final voume = 450 ml
Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:53:15 Seq. Line : 36 f Sample Name : 7191-08 vial : 18 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequence F=1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

# 1 Acq. Method : HFQ-END.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHCDS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH ?.na?Isis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr_


# ~ ADC1 A. `Nater 430 IC (0398-OSA1018-3601.0)

us ;



# ~ 80 -

l 

# i 40= ;

; i = '

0—

_ 

# ~ 0 1 2 3



# ~ External Standa=d Report ---_-___-



# ~ Sorted By t - : Signal Ca1ib. Daa Modiried Fr=day, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 ?1M Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 1.0000


# ~ Si nal 1: ADC1 A Water 430 IC

g , 

# ~ RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [minl [uS*sl [ug/mll

------- 

## I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1

-- 

## 1 ------------------ 

# 1 4.208 = _ _ Hydrogen Fluoride 5.231 Hydrogen Chloride Totals : 0.00000


### I Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 1 Warnings or Errors : ? 

## ~ , ! ~ ,~

# Curve(s)/QA Point(s)

Chromatograms

,. 

# ~ C_30 

# . ~~ ri1\3`\MET :CDS\HF'Q-.NIEAT.M of 12%29; 97 5 .03 . Io' PM

Method Infor:nation

~ 

### ?nalvs=s of ar_ions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

-- --- 

### I ANALOG

- DIGIT

~ 

### L CONVERTER 

# l 

# escriat ion:

zcu= -e 

# _ E r.i _s /Vo! t : = eakwi dth (Data Rate) . 't= Time :



# ~ aza Storace: Start data: Stop data: Sianal 1 Water 430 T

_C S igr:al 

### uS 1000.000 0.053 Min (5.00 Hz) 

### No Limit A11 

### Signal 2 ALC1 CHANNEL B Signal RIU 999999.973 2.660 Min (0.10 Hz ) 

### Same As Sicnal 1 Part - ial. - 0.01 Min 0.01 Min 

# L arz- Signal Source: External Devic_ Will Starc 35900



# ~ _:ned Event Table : <:'io eve_Tlt j >



### C 31 -P,5 

### ~.._-:"cd. _ . \'riFCH EM\?\,.`

~ IL.Ti-?CLj\H

~ Q-N

~ AT.M Of 12/29/97 5.03 .15 PM

------------------------- 

### HP 1100 Quate=nary Pump 1



### ~ Cor_trcl



### Flow 1.500 ml/min Stopti:ne 6.00 min 

# I Posttime Off 5c1 rents Solvent A 0. 0 °s ( 30 a

~ 

### IeOH)

: 

### Cff Sov 

### en~ 3 I

~ 

### .

Solvent C 100.0 s(2 mM NaSenzoat_ pFi 6.1) c o lver ='J 0.0 a( 2 R1M iZHP Pt'I 6.2)


# ~ -r=ssureLimits

M_r.imum Pressure 0 bar


## ~ Maxi;num Pressur_ -' 00 bar

arv 

### Maximal Flow Ramp 100.00m1/min"2

: 

### A 

### uto *n 

# ~ Pr_ary Chan:_e? 

### 33*10w -6/bar

Compressin i l=`y M_nima'_ Strcke iuto


# ~ Store Parameters

Store Ratio A Y°s Store Ratio 3 Y_s 

# ~ S tore Rat io C : 

### 'Ies

Stor= Rat_c C '_'as 

### Store Flow Str= Pr 

### e ss 

### U re : Y 

### es ;, 

# ~ Yes



### ------------------- HP 1100 Autcsampler

' :n -

, ?ct_oT'i 

### :nj ect=on Mode Needle 'Aash 

### Tnj ector volume 100 . 0

: 

### 100 ~1 

### Wash 

## ~ lial ~


### Au:t=1 i ar'I



### Crawspeed 100 μl/min 

# ~ S;=ctsUeed 

### : 1000 u_/min

Draw nositior. 2.0

~ 

### un 

### Time Stopt;me As Pumt)

_ Posttime Cff



# ~ --- HP

- 1100

- Colurz

- Thermostat

- l --------------------
Te
~ 

### nrerature settinas C

### ~:• ~_ ~ _ . , :PC-`iEM\3\ME=HCDS\:?FY-NEAT.M of 12/29/97 5.03.16 rM



### Left temperature 30.0°C 

## ~ Right temperature : Same as left

Enable analysis When Temp. is within setpoint +%- 0.8°C .Store lert temperature : No 

## ~ Store right temperature: No Time Stoptime As pump Posttime Off Column Switchins Valve Column 1



# i

~ I

9 C - 33 / 

## ~\rFC: F.M'\3\,ME';"1CDS\0398-05A.M 

# I 

# -------__- c=

------------ 1ibration Curves Afea= Hydrogen Fluoride at exp. RT: 4.208 ADCI A, Water 430 IC

, aoo- 5 Correlation: 0.99956 Residual Std. Dev.: 10.29804 aoo - For:nula : y= mx + b 

# ~ : 3 m: 40.75751

1100- = b: -79.09953 z°o = 1 

### x : Amount [ug/ml ] 

### y: Area 0 

# = ~ 0 10 20 Amountrua/mll

Area - i3 

### ydrogen Chloride at exp . RT : 5. 2 3 1 - ioo - , ACCl A, Water 43 0 IC 

### Correlation: 0.99954 1 

### Res_dual Std. Dev.. 7.33180 400 - ; Fo rmul a: y= mx + b 300= 3 m: 53.53597

'- b: -9.28962

` 0° ~ 

### x : Amount (ug/ml l 100 = y : Ar=_ a 0: 0 s 10

Amountlug/mil

C 3 ~ ~~

# ~ I cc F . , :PC:?EM\s\METHCDS\0398-05A.M


### Calibration Table ----------------------



### J Ca__b. Data Mcd_fied 

# 1 Calculate : Based on ' Rel : Re=erence r1i ndow : ?.bs Rer=rence Wi ndcw Rel . Non- rer . 'rlindow 

### Abs. Non-re=. Window f ':ncalibraced Peaks 

### ? : 

### art_al Caiibrat_on Correct A11 Ret. Times. Curve ''ype 

### Cr=cin weiaht 

### Recalibration Settings: Avzrage Response Averaae Re:_r_tion Time: Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM External Standard Peak Area 5.000 a 

### 0.000 min 15.000 a 

### 0.000 min not. reported Yes, identified peaks are recalibrated No, only for identified peaks Linear igr:ored Ecual


### Average all calibrations Averace all calibrations Caiibrat=on Renort Cotions : Printout of reca_ibrations w=thin a seauence: Calibracion Tab1e after Recalibration Normal Report after Recalibration IF th e secruence is dor_e with bracketina: 

### Resul
~ 

### s or iirst cycle (ending previous bracket) S i gnal i: ADC1 A, Wat=r 430 IC 

### RetTime Lvl Amount Area Amt/Ar=a ReL Grn Name (rnin] Sig (ug/m1J - 

# I---1--1--------------- 4.208 

# ------- ~ 

# -- ~ 

# -- ~ 

# ----------

1 1 4.92100 

# ---------- 128.22501 

# I ----------

3.83778e-2 ??ydrogen Fluor_de 2 9.23700 294.02745 3.14154e-2 3 12.84000 430.76395 2.98075e-2 4 15.96000 580.25609 2.75051a-2

5 24.41000 916.98201 2.66199e-2 

### 5.231 1 1 1.94300 94.02741 2.06642e-2 Hydrogen Chlor'-de

2 3.64800 192.18530 1.89817e-2 3 6.76200 342.32288 1.97533e-2 4 9.45100 500.26447 1.88920e-2 5 11.39000 601.82468 1.89258e-2



### Peak Sum Table



### ' ***No Entries in table***

'



## ~

- - - --- C - 34

### F_=e c:\HPCHEM\3\ ,DP.TA\1998DA'

~ 

### 'A\MAR 98\0398-05A\001-0101.D

I_^_

. jection Date 12-Mar-98, 17:05:32 Seq. Line i Sample Name : Std 1 Vial : 1 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S ncq. Method : HFQ-1ST.M Analysis Method : F: \HPC_-iEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M 

### Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 3GH Analysis oi anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr.

ADC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\001-0101.0) uS
? 3

~ U a Q r ~ y

~ _ . O

~

/ 0 n N N
OO —

s0 —

20 —

[tTr
0 E 4 ,iiG



### External Star_dard Re

- corSor_ed 3y S 4 crr.a_ 

### Ca=_b. Data Mod=y_ed F=iday, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 AIM Mult 4 plier 1.0000 Di1ut'ion 1.0000 Signal 1. ADCI A, 'nlater 430 ]'C Rei:':'i me 

### [min]
4 .170 5 .221 

### Totals Result TYPe Area [uS*s]



### ~ ------ 

### ~ ---------- 

### BB 133.71863 BB 93.13246

s obtained with en AmL; ."-krea

~ ---------- 3.90489e-2 2.05422e-2



### hanced inte , *** End of 

### Amcunt Grp Name

[ug/ml]

~ 

# ---------- 1--1----------------- 5.22157 Hydrogen F=::c=?:e 1.91315 Hydrogen Chloride
7.13471 

### 3rator! Renort ***

C-36 

# ~ /

### a ci_:= E:\7 =CHEM`,3\DATA\1.998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\001-0201.D JtQ _

------------------ 

### Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 17:12:04 Seq. Line : 2

~ 

### ampie Name : Std 1 Vial : 1 .cq. Operator BGH Inj 1 Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M

~ 

### ast changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM b_v 5GH Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr.

a0C I A, 'rVater 430 IC ;0398-+75A\001-0201.0 1 us d 4 7 U Fo CY L

~
U L 7

~ ?

—

~ .4 .V

~

0 1 2 3 d 5 'nirt



### External Standard Remort

Scrted Bv Signal ;:alib. Data Mod=_ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32

~~ 

### I Mult=plier 1.0000 Di tion 1.0000 

### Si-gnal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC ZetTi:ne Type Area P,mt/Area Amount Grp Name (mi.r.] [uS*s] (ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.175 BB 142.74135 3.81315e-2 5.44294 Hydrogen 5.227 BP 94.02020 2.05246e-2 1.92973 Hydrogen Chior:de Totals : 7.37267 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C - 37 

### ~~~ 

### :a =_? - ~ 

### - . ~ 

### ?C::EM\3\ , Di`.Ti\1998DAi'A` C ~L~ 

### tZ_98\0398-05a\012-2301.D


### =:.jection Dace 12-Mar-98, 20:28:31 Seq Line 23 Sample Name : Std 1 Vial : 12 'Lcq . Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

### Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 3cq . Method : H. Q-SAIME . M :?r.alys_s Method : F : \HPCHEM\3\MET;iODS\0398-05A.M 

### rast chanced : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Ar:alysis of anions Ion bv Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADCt A. vVater a30 ]C (0398-OSAt012-2301.D
us ~ (U

I u'. U

_ c v a - o y ~

~ 30 -

Q LO

60 -

40 -

20 -

0-
0 1 i 3 4 5 min



### External Standard Recort
SCYt.ed 3y SigI1a1 

### Ca1_b. Data Modi=iea Frida.r, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM mu , tipli e1- 1 .0000 

### 3

- . ;iucicn 1.0000 Sigr.al 1. ALCI A, Wat_r 430 IC 

### RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Gr p Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# 1--I------------------
------- ~ 

# ------ ~ 

# ---------- 4.238 BB 

# I ---------- I

110.05740 4.21692e-2 

# ---------- 4.64103 Hydrogen 5.236 3B 91.43774 2.05767e-2 1.88149 Hydrogen Chioride
' Tocals : 6.52252 Results obtai ned with er_hanced integrator! 

### *** End of Report ***

C - 38 94 

## ~

### :a File F:\HPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MA.R_98\0398-OSA\012-2401.D Std _

-------------------- 

### Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 20:35:03 Seq. Line : 24

, 

### ample Name : Std 1 Vial : 12 .Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 9:51:31 AM by BGH Analvsis of ar.ions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A1012-2401.0) uS V

~ o L+- U c ~

80 — ;Area: 95.7645
— ea:125.08

~ , ~

_ ~ N N
00 — 

# I 40-

20 —

O 

# _

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 mirt



### Extzrnal Standard Report
Sorced By Signal Calib. Data Modifiea Friday, March 13, 1998 9:50:07 AM ' MultiDlier 1.0000 

### Dilut

- Lon 1.0000

~ 

### Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Area Amt/.;:rea Amount Grp Name
. [min.] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.248 MM 125.08370 3.90776e-2 4.88797 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.238 MM 95.76450 1.99022e-2 1.90592 Hydrogen Chloride Totals : 6.79389

. tesults obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C-39_~ e . . \: =C

~ ?E

~ I\3\DA^_'A\_?98D

~ TA',Y?

~

_ 9 8 ,C398-.C3..,CG2-0301.D


### Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 17:18:36 Seq. Line : 3 Sample Name : Std 2 Vial : 2 .cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 .Sequence Fi1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENC '-T\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-SA,ME.M Ar.alysis Mechod : F:\HPCFEM\3\ME 7 :CDS\0398-05A.M 

### Last chanced : 3/13,/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH ynalys'_s of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADCt A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A1002-0301.0) uS

c
/ > O >. 30 -

N Q LrN



# I 30 -

4 Q -

20 -

0-
0 1 2 3 4 - rin



### Ext_rnal Standard Report
Scrted By Sigr.al 

### Cal_b. Data Modified Frtday, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 AM 'Au1 r i Cller 1.0000

- 

### i'_u--' on 1.0000 

### S_anal 1:

~ 

### DC1 A, Water 430 -TC RecTi:ne Type Area Amt/Ar_a Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# ---- -I------I----------I I ---------- 1--1 ----- ------- 4.218 BB 282.03073 3.14166e-2 8.86046 Hydrogen Fl::or:de 5.273 BB 174.56081 1.96731e-2 3.43415 Hydrogen Ch1--=icie
! T--tals : 12.29461 

### .tesults obtair_ed with enhanced integrator!

----------------------- 

### *** End of Report ***
C - 40

.-.F 1

# 1 Da::a File F:\HPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\002-0401.D J Q



### I Injection Date : — --------------------------------------- 

### 12-Mar-98, 17:27:51 Seq. Line : 4 Sample Name : Std 2 Vial : 2 acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequence File : 

# 1 Aca. Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\Sc ,QUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S HFQ-NEXT.M Asialysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

# ~ Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\002-0401.0) 

# 1 uS

_ ~ c U
' L



### a, 

# i i

~ :V N

20 — 

# i
a 

# i 0—

0 1 2 3 4 5

- nin



### External Standard Report

Sorted By Signal Calib. Data Modified Fri-day, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilution 

# ~
: 

### 1.0000 Sigr_al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC


# ~ Ret'Time Type Area Amt/Arsa Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/m1) 

# ------------------ ------- ~ 4.217 

# --

BB 

# ---------

279.71878 

# ----------

3.14735e-2 

# -------

8.80373 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.273 BB 177.74675 1.96553e-2 3.49366 Hydrogen Chloride


# ~ Totals : 12.29739 Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

# ~ 

# _________________ *** End of Report ***

C - 41

~ 

### '

### a:a Fi=e

~ 

### : , ,H?C

~ 

### :E,M\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\013-2501.D 3 ~ ~



### Inject=on Date 12-Mar-98, 20:41:34 Seq Line 25

~ 

### ample Name Std 2 Vial 13

- ~ 

### cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M Ana'_ysis Method : F:\HPCaEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH A*:alvsis of ar_ions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ACC1 A, 'A/ater 430 IC (0398-05A\013-2501.0)
'iS

'l U c v 

# a

n

-

~ ..

Ln

0 ! 2 3 4 5 mirrt 

# I =---------------------------------------------_______________________ Externa'_ Star_dard Report ~


### So=_ed 3y Signal Calib. Data Modified F=iday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM `^.ultiplier 1.0000 

### Dilution 1.0000 J 

### Signal 1: ADC1 i 

### A, Water 430 IC
I Rec.Time Type Area Amt/Area Amour.t Grp Name [minl [uS*s] 

# -- ~ 

# - ----- ~ 

# ---------- [ug/ml] 

# ----------1--1 ---- 4.246 BB 

# I

308.31213 

# ----------

3.08301e-2 9.50528 Hydrogen Fluo=-":

- = 5.282 BB 210.12138 1.95048e-2 4.09839 Hydrogen Chloride Totals : 13.60367 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C - 42 / 

## ~ ,?i_e _ . , :PC: E.

~ i`,3\DA T

~ .'

~ 199

~ 3DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\013-2601.D 

## JC : _

---------------- 

### Tnjection Date : 12-Mar-98, 20:48:06 Seq. Line : 26 

## Sam>e Name : Std 2 Vial : 13

~ 

### cq 

## _ ✓ '_ Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Secuence File : F:\HPCHENI\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M Analv _sis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M r.ast char_ged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

## Ar.alysis of ar_ions Ion b_v Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\013-2601.0) uS

~ 

## _ g ~ U- U

. c Ol y
_ Q ~ G ~ 80 — = >

y ~ N
I J

`' ' 0 —

''+0 —

0—

.3 1 2 3 a 5 ?11ri



# ~ External Standard Report =====__________________ _
' Sorr-*ad By Signa'_ 

### Ca?ib. Data Mod'_fied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 :UM Mu'_tiplier 1.0000 1 Dilu= on 1.0000 

### S

- Lgna'_ 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetT=me Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [minJ [uS*s] [ug/m11 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.246 33 306.04816 3.08766e-2 9.44973 Hydrogen F?uoride 5.282 BB 206.31227 1.95201e-2 4.02723 Hvdrogen Chlor'lde
Totals : 13.47697 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report ***

C - 43 

## •

~ 

## __.. , „c ,_a F;1e F: '
~ HPCF?EM\3\DA'?A\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\003-0501.Z) S

~ : d 3



### In

~ 

### ection Date 12-Mar-98, 17:34:21 Seq. Line 5 'ample Name : Std 3 Vial : 3 :-=. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sectuence Z

- i1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M Ar_alysis Mechod : F:\HPC ;EM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Last chancJed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Ar.alysis oz anions Ior. by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr.

AOC1 A. 'Nater 430 IC !,0398-0SA

~ 003 0501.D) uS 2 — 

### U. U 

## o n 30 — 

### ! i ~
• i

~ '

. N (n

60 —

20 —

0—
1 2 3 4 5 T71R



### External Standard Reoort '



# ~ Sorted By Sigr_al 

### Cal'-b. Data Modified Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Mu'-tiolier 1.0000 

# ~ Dilut'_on 1.0000 

### Signal 1: ADC1 A, Wacer 430 iC



# ~ RetTi;ne 'I`yDe Ar=a Amt%Area Amount Grp Name [ min] [uS * s 

### ] [ug/ml ] 

# ~

-- --- i ------ i ---------- i ---------- i ---------- i -- 

# ~

------------------ 

### 4.264 BB 417.59354 2.91828e-2 12.18654 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.329 BB 310.52176 1.92378e-2 5.97377 Hydroge_^_ Cr.loride


# ~ Totals : 18.16031 Results obtained with er.hanced integrator! 

# ~ 

# _------------------------------------------__________________________ *** End of Report *** 

### /~~-~a~ 

### a File F:"\HPCHEM\3\DATA\i998DATA\iMAR_98\0398-05A\003-0601.D Std



### :njectior. Date 12-Mar-98, 17:40:54 Seq Line 6 Sample Name : Std 3 Vial : 3 ?_cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Secuence Fi1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Metnod : HFQ-NEXT.M =_nalysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\ME 'I'HODS\0398-05A.M

~ 

### asc changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM bv BGH Aralysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr.

ADC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-05A\003-0601.0)



### _ a ? o

—

~ 

## L

?

30 —

40_ ~



# ~ =

20 — 

# ~

. :

, .

~ 0— Q uO

0 mirt



### Lxternal Standard Report

So=zed 3v Sianal Calib. Data Modi`ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AIM Mu_=io1i er 1.0000 D 4 -_u n 1.0000 

### Sigr.al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC Re t''I'ime T`ype Area Amt /Area Amount Grp Name 

### [m=n] [uS*s] [ua/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- ( ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.265 BB 412.98615 2.92346e-2 12.07350 Hydrogen F'-uor'-de 5.330 BP 308.27881 1.92419e-2 5.93187 Hydrogen Chlor_de Totals . 18.00537 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator!

- ------------- 

### *** End of Report ***



## ~~ ~998DA=

~ \NL

~ _98\0398-OSA',01-1-3701.D

--------------- 7 

### njection Date : 12-Mar-98, 20:54:36 Seq. Line : 27 

### Sample Name : Std 3 Vial : 14 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj 1 Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S ?.cq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

### Ana'_ys'_s Method F:\riPCHEM\3\METt:ODS\0398-05a.M Last cnanged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH .:

~ 

### nalvsis of anions Ion bv Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADC1 A, Wacer 430 IC (0398-05A\014-2701.0) us j J
'1 d

30 = ;/ _T ` 

# ~ .• i.

~ 50 — ~

- ~

ZO -

0—
0 1 2 3 a 5 nin



### External Standa=d Report

Sorted 3v Signal Calib. Data Modified Fr=day, `^.ultipli=r 1.0000 

### Diiut'ion 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.268 BB 444.94696 2.88971e-2 12.85767 Hydrogen Flucride 5.344 BB 369.83966 1.91482e-2 7.08177 Hydrogen Chloride Totals : 19.93943 

### Results obtained with erhanced intearator! *** End of Report ***

C - 46 

# /G~~ ::a=a c__e F:\ :PC'-iEM\3\DA'

~ A\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\014-2801.D



### In;acLion Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:01:05 Seq. -- - 

### Line ----------- 

### : 28 Samole Name : Std 3 Vial : 14 Acq_ Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M Ar_alysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M LasL changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Ar_alysis of anions Ion by ~+~ 

### aters 430 IC - 2RP-x100 150x4.1 coiumn

AOC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-0SA',014-2801.0) uS ~ a o ~

- c y ~

30 - ~ T L

N ~ c`7

~ Q fl

. '

40 —

20 -

0-

4 'nin

--------- ---------- 

### Exterza'_ Standard Report
Jorr?d By Signal Ca'ib. Data Modi

~ 

### ied Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM yu'_:iplier 1.0000 D1'-u orl 1.0000 

### S:cna'_ 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC
RetT;

~ 

### ne Tvpe Area Amt/Area Amounc. Grp Name 

### [min] [uS*s] (ug/ml] 

# -- -I------I----------I----------I----------1--1 ------- 4.267 BV 447.52917 2.88719e-2 12.92102 ' riydrogen Fluoride 5.343 VB 380.65131 1.91349e-2 7.28372 Hydrogen Chloride


# ~ Totals : 20.20474 Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

# 1

= - -------------------------- --

- - - - - - -- - - - - - ------- - - - --------------- 

### *** End of

- 

### Report ***

, C-47

# I :a ~ :a F 4 1e ?: \ \ HPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAt2 98\0398

- 05A\004-0701.D



### injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 17:47:27 Seq. Line : 7 Sample Name : Std 4 vial : 4 :

~ 

### cq: Cperator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequer_ce File : r^:\HPCHEM\3\SEQL'ENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S Acq. Method : HaQ-SAME.M

?~ r_alys_s Methcd : F: \HPCHEM\3\ME''H ODS\0398-05A.M 

### Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 3na'-_ysis or ar_icns Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

AOC1 A, Water 430 iC (0398-OSA\004-0701.0) uS a °?

_ 

### ~ o



### ~ Ut c•, c . y '

% — —

40—

20 —


# 1 °_

0


### External Standard Report
SorteC 3y Sr.c,- nal Ca'_-b. Data Modified F=iday, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 AN? multiolier 1.0000 

### 2=1u on 1.0000 :-"igna'_ 1.

~ 

### DC1 A, Wacer 430 IC RetTime 'I','rpe Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

### [min] (uS*s] (ug/ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1
-- 1 ------------------ 4.299 BB 594.00116 2.78026e-2 16.51476 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.377 BB 495.39807 1.90293e-2 9.42708 Hydrogen Chloride Totals 25.94184 

### Results obcained with enhanced intzgrator!



### --------------------- *** Lnd of Report *** ~

I j Std

mir

r -seC::EM\•3\DATA\1998DATA\M

~ R_78\0398-05A\004-0801.D

' 1_^. 

### jection Date 12-Mar-98, 17:53:58 Seq. Line 8 Samnle Name : Std 4 Vial : 4

" 

### cq_ Operator BGH Inj ~ 

### :ecruence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S : 2 .cc. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M ana'-v _sis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M Lasc changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59

~ 

### LM bv BGH 

### Anal_vs- 4 s of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr_
A0C1 A, Wa[er 4.30 iC (0398-OSA\004-0801.0) 

# us

~ 

# a

~ -

_ ~ ~'• ^' y
30 - 

## - ~ '' 

## i = ' N / C yn 60 - 

### ~

~ , r



### _ I 40 -

?0 - 

# 0-

0 1 2 3 4 5 mirt 

# -------------- -------------------------------- -______ ' --------_-------------------------------------------- _ External Standard Report
Sor_=_d 31i Signal 

### Ca_ib. Data Mcdified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM .'/!u=`.' r)1_er 1.0000 

### Di' ut'ior. 1.0000 S_gna' ]. . ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

# i Rec^_'ime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name

[ 

### min] [uS*sJ [ug/m1J

-- -- --

- 

### ~

------ 

### ~

---------- 

### ~

---------- 

### ~

---------- 

### ~ 

## 1

------------------ 

# 1 4.297 BB 605.48212 2.77406e-2 16.79645 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.374 BB 499.13284 1.90267e-2 9.49684 Hydrogen Ch':,==de Tocals : 26.29329 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator!

-------------------- 

### *** End of Recort ***
C - 49 /7

. . ...1 . . 'I / I n / n n . n n ~ . .•. r w• rn/-TS 0> r'7A3 .

~ _e _ : \HPC;ElvI\3\DaTA\1998DAT: ~\^t~~ 98\0398

- 05a`,015-2901. ~

--------------- 

### Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:07:37 Seq. Line : 29 Sample Name : Std 4 Vial : 15 cq. Operator : BGh Inj : 1

, ~ 

### equence File : F:\

- riPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq . Me thod : HFQ - S;uME . M %nalysi s Method : F: \HPC??EM\3\MET::ODS\0398-05A. M 

### 7 ast changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM bv BGH analysis oz anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PkP-x100 150x4.1 column

ADC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-OSA\015-2901.0) uS zs °



### _ ~ 

### a•, - v

~ 3O — ~

~ N Q ~ o'O —

20 —

0—

O E 4



### External Standar3 Report
Sor-=d By Signal Calib. Data Modifiecl Fri.day, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 A1M 

### Mu_t_olier 1.0000

- 

### nilut' ion 1.0000

~ 

### z;gr,al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime Type Area amt/Area Amount Grp Name (min] (uS*s] (ug/ml] 

# ---- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1----------------

- - 4.291 BV 558.72919 2.80088e-2 15.64935 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.388 VB 505.04385 1.90226e-2 9.60725 Hydrogen Chloride Totals 25.25660 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End of Report *** 

## C - 50 /CJ';aca -

' 4 'ile : :\N_CHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\M-AR_98\0398-05A\015-3001.D 

### S .- ,. 

### Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:14:08 Seq. Line : 30 Sample Name : Std 4 Vial : 15 kcq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHCDS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column

AOC1 A. 'Nater 430 iC (0398-05A1015-3001.0)
us

- ~ a 

## _~.
Q L
30 —

v P'.il 60 —

40 —

20 -

0—
0 1 2 3 4 5 mirr



### External Standard Reioort



# ~ Sorted By Signal Ca1ib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Multiplier 1.0000 

# ~ Diluc'ion 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Wacer 430 IC


# ~ RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] (uS*s] (ug; ml] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1----------------

- - 

# ~ 4.291 BV 562.81189 2.79836e-2 15.74952 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.388 VB 501.48309 1.90250e-2 9.54074 Hydrogen Chloride 

# I Totals : 25.29026 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator!

--------------- 

### *** End oz Report ***

~ ~ ,1 A~~~--~ - --a - . ~ :Fr :EM`,3\D

~ ?TA'•,1998DATA\

~~~ R_98\0398-05

~ 1\005-0901.D 

### Injection Date 12-Mar-98, 18:00:30 SeQ_ Line 

# ~ Sample Name : Std 5 Vial Acq. ODerator BGH Inj 

### Seque*:ce Fi1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

# ~ Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M

1 

### nalys:s Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METLGDS\0398-05A.M Last changed : 3/13/98 :0:29:59 AiM by BGH 

# I Ana?ysis o= anions T _on by Waters 430 IC - PRP-xI00 150x4.1 9 : 5 ?

column ~"~

ACCt A. Water 4.30 IC (0398-0SA',005-0901.0) uS

LL `.

_ ' c ~ ~ v 

# 1 30 - 

# ~ ~

c 50 - /



# ~ 40 - :



# ~ 20 - .



# ~ =

0- - 

# 1 0 1 2 3 1 5 niR


### External St.ar_dard Reoort 

# 1 3ortad By

_ : Si-r- al C. alib Data Modi=ied Fr'_day, March 13, 1998 10•27•32 AM Mul

- iplier 1.0000 Di:ut'=on 

# J

. 1.0000 S

- Lgr_al ]. : ADC1 A, Water 430 IC


# ~ Ret`='ime Type Araa A.mt/Area :zmount Grp Name 

### [miz] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# 1--I------------------ ------- I ------ 4.387 BV 

# I ----------

946.74646 

# I ----------

2.65853e-2 

# I ----------

25.16949 Hydrogen Flucride 

# ~ 5.418 VB 590.85229 1.89727e-2 11.21007 Hydrogzn Chlori:e Totals : 30'.37956 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! *** End oi RezJort ***

, C-52 //L,::a_a F:`, -PC:?DM\3'\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\005-1001.D

----------------------- 

### =njection Date : 12-Mar-98, 18:07:00 Seq. Line : 10 Sample Name : Std 5 Vial : 5 Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M Ar.alysis Mechod : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 3GH Anal;rsis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column Std

ADC1 A. INater 430 IC (0398-05A\005-1001.0) us

30 -

,

. •• ~~ ~ 0"0 - /

40 - I

20 -

~i 0- ~ ~ ~~ % Li- V:

~ c a~ i 4m ,

M
Q Ln

0 1 2 3 4 5 min



### External Standard Report
S"orted 3y Signa]. 

### Ca?ib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Multiplier 1.0000 Dilut'ion 1.0000 

### Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC RetTime ':'ype Ar=a Amt/Area Amount Grp Name [min] [uS*s] [ug/mi] 

# ---------- 1--1------------------ ------- ------ I I 4.383 BV 

# ---------- I ---------- I

948.08185 2.65824e-2 25.20226 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.414 VB 591.67432 1.89723e-2 11.22542 Hydrogen Chloride Tocals : 36.42768 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator!

+ *** End of Report *** 

## C-53
~ 

## //

### '_= F:\aPC

~ 

### _M\3\DATA\1998DATA\t

~ , 

### LA.R_98\0398-OSa\010-3101.D

~ 

### =:jection Date :

~ 

### ample Name Acq. Operator 

# 1 Seauence File : zcg. Method : A:alysis Methcd : 

# 1 Lasc changed : analysis of anions -------------------------------------------------- 

### 12-Mar-98, 21:20:41 Seq Line Std 5 Vial BGH Inj 

### F:\HPC :iEM\3\SEQliENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S HFQ-SAME.M F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM bv BGH Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 ------------------



### 31 : 16 1

column AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\016-3101.0) 

# 1 us

C a~ C y 

# 1

80 - $ 7 O1 O

so

ao =


# ~ 20 - 

# i

~ 

# °- -

0 - 1 2 - 3



### Ext=rnal Standard RemorL

~ 

### Scrted By Si g nal Cal_b. Data Mcdi=ied Fridav, March 13, 1998 10.27.32

~ 

### s^. 

# J mui ==plier : 1.0000 

### D_lu Cion 1.0000 _ Siar.al 1: ADCI A, Water 430 IC tec'='ime Type Area Amt/area Amount Grp Name (m=n] [uS*s] [ug/mi] 

# ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 4.340 BV 878.91571 2.67435e-2 23.50524 Hydrogen Fluor=de 5.428 VB 609.87872 1.89635e-2 11.56547 Hydrogen Chlcride Tocals : 35.07071 

### Results obtained with enhanced integrator! i 

### *** w -nd of Report ***

### aza F:\HPC?-iEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\016'-3201.D St -; :.



# ~ In;zction Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:27:10 Seq. Line Samp1e Name : Std 5 Vial .Acq. , Operator : BGH Inj Secruence File : r^:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

# J Zkca. Mechod : HFQ-NEXT.M Ar_alysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METIHODS\0398-O5A.M 

### Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

# ~ ynalysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 : 32 : 16 : 1

column
AOC' A. Water 430 IC (0398-OSA1016-3201.0) uS _ m •~ 

# ~

c ~

' 80

i c Q ~ 

# ' !

40 —

20 — 

### ! ~ ;



### ~



## . a_ ~ ~

' 0 1 2 3 4 

# ' ?

_ Exter*ial Standard eport

! Sor_ed 3y Signal

- 

### Cal 

## ~ b. Data Modi.ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM Mu'-tiplier 1.0000


## ~ Dilutton 1.0000 Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

# i RetTime Type Area Amt/area Amount Grp Name [min] (uS*s] [ug/ml] 

# ------- 4.341 BV 

# 1 -- -I------I----------I----------I----------1--I 894.18402 2.67058e-2 23.87986 Hydrogen Fluoride 5.430 VB 614.89337 1.89612e-2 11.65913 Hydrocen Chloride 

# I Totals : 35.53899 Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

# I =------------ ------------------------------------------------------- 

### *** End of Report ***



## , C - ss

~ 

## 3

### I APPENDIX D



# ~ PRODUCTION DATA

'



# I 

# I
I I i

D- 1 MLA i'C.'

. 

# ~ Pine Hal1 Brick Rapty To:

—~ PIN! NAIL dRtCK CO., INC. Lindsay Brid4o Road Poat 0}6oe Box 838 fNadieon. North Carolina 27025-0839 Telephone 910-648-6007 Fax 910,548-1887

3-13-98



### Robert F. Callahaa 

### Trrigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 6200 Harris Technology Blvd, Charlotte, N. C. 28269

Dear RobeR, This letter concerns the produ.ction rates through the kiln at Plant #5 when the stack tests were run last week.
Test 3-3-98 

### Brick: Pink Paver Fired Weight : 5.03 # / Brick Brick per Car: 2430 Wei& per Car: 6.11 Tons Push Rate: 28 Cars / Day Hourly Rate: 7.13 Tons / Hr
Test 3-6-98 

### Brick: Red Paver F'ired Weight: 5.4 # / Brick Brick per Car: 2430 Weight per Car : 6.56 Tons Push Rate: 34 Can / Day Hourly Rate: 9.29 Tons / Hr

~ 

### Sincerely,



### Harold B. Newman Manager of Technical Servir,es

2701 Shorefair Drive, P.O. Box I1044 Wusion-Sa1m NC 27116-1044 Tel. (910)'721-1500 Fax (910) 725-3940 

### [DIM

~ 

### //h

### APPENDIX E

CALIBRATION DATA



# I

E-1 -

### ISOKINETIC CONSOLE CALIBRATION DATA SHEET



# ~

~

~ Client: Pine Hall Brick Co. City, State/Location: Madison, NC-Kiln Exst EHS Div. Project No: 046-97-191 Date: 03/08/98 ` Baro. Press., in. Hg: 28.729 Calibrator Initials: RSC Console #: 300.035 Dry Gas Meter No.: 9395 Wet Test Meter No.: 600.002



### Initial Settin s, Volumes and Tem eratures Time 0 minutes Yi Isokinetic Console Wet Test Meter Orifice Meter, 0 H in. H20 Dry Gas Meter Vacuum, Volume and Temperature Meter Volume (Vw) ft' Meter

Temp. (tw) °F' Vacuum In. Hg Volume

(Vd) ft 3 Inlet

°F Outlet

°F Average (td) °F 1.44 6.0 10.10 80.5 73.5 77.0 10.0 71.8 14.80 0.996 1.44 6.0 10.09 84.5 75.5 80.0 10.0 71.8 14.75 1.003 1.44 6.0 10.13 87.0 77.5 82.3 10.0 72.0 14.80 1.002

y = 1.00 Example Calculation: Vw Pb (td + 460) Vd (Pb + (OH/13.6))(tw + 460)

Where: Vw = Gas volume of wet test meter, cubic feet Vd = Gas volume of dry gas meter, cubic feet tw = Temperature of wet test meter, degrees Fahrenheit td = Average temperature of dry gas meter, degrees Fahrenheit OH = Pressure differential across oriSce meter, inches water y i = Ratio of accuracy of wet test meter to dry gas meter for each replicate 'y = Average ratio of accuracy of wet test meter to dry gas meter for all replicates; tolerance = pretest y t 0.05 y Pb = Barometric pressure, inches mercury A= Time of calibration run, minutes

g:\046\excel\metercal\metercal.xls Revised 02/13/98

E-2 1i ~ 

# F P7A7 r,

### PRETEST - POSTEST CALIBRATION DATA FOR,ti1

Client

Z, n e. 1• 

### ~a~~ ~ cz, C-t— 

### Pretest Date Calibrator :eference Thermometer 100.022 City/State 

## ,tJG Postest Date 3

~ i 

### Lib 

### Calibrator G Reference Barometer 600.003
Pretest Postest_ . Temperature, °F' Rer. Tem .°F Tem ratn °F Ref: Tem _°F Ome a Red Team DB/WB #100.025 ~ Ome a Green Team DB/WB #100.031 Ome a Blue Team DB ##100.017 - Ome a Gold Team DB/WB #100.032 Ome a Grev Team DB #100.033 Ome a CEM DB/WB #100.026 Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.035 -- 4 r , Z Z Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.045 Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.067 Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.100 - Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.200 Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300 .214 Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.241 Drv Gas Meter IilletJOutiet #300.248 Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300. Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300. Umbilical Ada tor # 1 #300. C (•i 7 •Jmbilical Ada tor # i #300. 7,1 to 400 Umbilical Ada tor # 1'?-#300. LI? 6 i.11, Umbilical Ada tor # #300. Umbilical Ada tor # #300. Umbilical Ada tor # #300. Probe #200. S 1,6 Probe #200. C Probe #200. a a 4 l Probe #200. Probe #200. Probe #200. Pitot #200. O V7 LA L Pitot #200.

.. Fieid Baro ' m: H Ref. Baro ie. H' > Field Baro irr: fi Ref' Barv in. H Barometer Red Team #600.001 Barometer Green Team #600.014 Barometer Blue Team #600.010 2,9 ZO i-7 t`I a z. io Barometer Gold Team #600.021 D '3arometer CEM #600.020(D) 

### Were all postest calibrations within the specified EPA Quality Assurance criteria? ;d Yes o No

E-3 

### //f , 

# I I 11

### Stationary Source Sampling Report Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 4

ICiln Stack Madison, North Carolina Trigon Project # 046-95-104 June 1995

J / ~~

# STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT FOR PINE I3A.LL BRICK COMPANY

PLANT NO. 4 MADISON, NORTH CAROLINA

Kiln Stack

Performed by: Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. Air Monitoring Division 1920 Starita Road, Suite J Charlotte, North Carolina 28206

704/598-1049 

### Trigon Project # 046-95-104 

## June 1995


# /

O z!~ WT -IN11 1i

### REPORT CERTIFICATION

The sampling and analyses performed for this report were carried out under my supervision and/or direction.

Date 

## --F"A e- ZZ . ~ ~ ~ 

### Signature Tom E. Wynn Project Manager Air Monitoring Division Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc.

I have reviewed all testing details and results in this report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

J~ '''e 

### ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ 

### Si ~Ltu~ ~ a~t~w Date ~ 

### gnature Paul R. Jenkins, Jr. Quality Assurance Manager Air Monitoring Division Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc.

I have reviewed all testing details and results in this report and hereby certify that the test report is authentic and accurate.

~ 

### Date Z 2 

### ~ Signature
.~ 

### Richard B. McCain, III Manager Air Monitoring Division Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc.
ii I

%/~

-

~ ?"/ ~S~/~

-l1w ~ 111

### TABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

## 1.1 Purpose ................................................1 1.2 Outline of Test Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.3 Test Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 2.1 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Figure 1 - Process Air Flow Schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 3.0 SAMPLING METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.1 Sampling Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2.1 Hydrogen Fluoride, Particulate Matter Sampling and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 3.2.2 Sampling Ports and Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Figure 2 - Location of Sampling Ports and Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
4 

## .0 RESULTS
................................... .............9. 4.1 Sununary of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Table 1- Summary of Results, Bricks with 2% Limestone Addition ..... 10 Table 2 - Summary of Results, Normal Brick Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

## 5.0 APPENDICES .............................................. 12 A. Summary of Results and Example Calculations B. Field Data Sheets C. Laboratory Data D. Production Data E. Calibration Data

iii 

# /,~.~ TR rmcx

### 1.0 INTRODUCTION

This section describes the purpose, a brief outline including the sampling and analytical strategy, and the personnel involved in the test program.

1.1 Purpose The purpose of this sampling project was to determine concentrations and emission rates of hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter from the kiln stack located at the Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 4 in Madison, North Carolina. The results of the sampling and the documentation provided in this report will be used for air emission inventory and engineering purposes.

1.2 Outline of Test Program Stationary source sampling was perforined June 8 and 9, 1995 by the Air Monitoring Division of Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. at the Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 4 in Madison, North Carolina. Six 1-hour sampling runs were conducted on the kiln stack, three with a 2% limestone addition to the brick on June 8th and three during normal brick production (without limestone) on June 9th. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Methods 1 through 4 and Method 26A were used for the determination of hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter concentrations and emission rates. All sampling and analytical procedures used were those established by the US EPA in standard reference test methods and appropriate state-of-the-art analytical procedures. The test runs were . conducted during normal operating conditions.

1.3 Test Participants The project was managed by Mr. Tom E. Wynn, Project Manager, Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. Mr. Wynn may be contacted at 704/598-1049 or by facsimile at 704/598-1050. The test team included Messrs. Brian L. Wrenn and James C. Cafferty of Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. Sampling was coordinated by W. Vernon Moore, Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 4 Manager and other facility personnel. Mr. Moore may be contacted at 910/548-6007.

~ 

# F7AT111

~~~

### 2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION

This section contains a brief description of a continuous push tunnel kiln process, the type and amount of materials handled, and a typical process air flow schematic.

2.1 Discussion 

### The Pine Hall Brick Company in Madison, North Carolina produces bricks for commercial building. In the continuous push tunnel kiln process bricks enter three zones, the exhaust and recirculating zone, the firing zone and the cooling zone. The bricks enter the kiln through the exhaust and recirculating zone where they are dried at 850°F by recirculated air from the cooling zone. They are then pushed into the firing zone and heated to 1970°F. The firing zone is fueled by natural gas. Next the bricks are moved into the cooling zone. The heat loss from this zone is recycled to the exhaust and recirculating zone to dry the incoming brick. Process gases are exhausted to the atmosphere via kiln and stack. Figure 1 details the process air flow schematic.
Production data during the sampling was compiled by Pine Hall Brick Company personnel. On June 8, 1995 bricks with a 2% limestone addition were loaded at 11.9 tons per hour and natural gas was consumed at 23,696 cubic feet per hour. On June 9, 1995 bricks without the limestone addition were loaded at 11.6 tons per hour and natural gas was consumed at 23,425 cubic feet per hour. This documentation is provided in Appendix D.

2



## /4 

# V

## Kiln Stack
Atmosphere



# T

Stack F Sampling Location



# T

Kiln



# I

Figure 1 Process Air Flow Schematic

3

~ - / ~ ~

........... ~

... i ~

### 3.0 SAMPLIlYG METHODS

"fhis section describes the sampling strategy, sampling and analytical methods, and quality assurance/quality control procedures implemented during this project.

3.1 Sampling Strategy The sampling and analytical procedures used during this test program were those established by the US EPA and North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NC DEHNR). Sampling runs were conducted in triplicate for each process to validate the sampling. Tests were conducted during normal operating conditions and were suspended during intermittent periods when processes were _not being run. There were no unusual conditions noted during the sampling.

3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures The US EPA methods used in this sampling program were Method 1 for the location of sampling ports and points, and determination of cyclonic flow, Method 2 for the determination of volumetric flow rates, Method 3A for the determination of dry molecular weight of the stack gas, and Method 4 for the determination of moisture in the stack gas. Method 26A was used to determine concentrations and emission rates of hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter. A sampling and analysis synopsis is discussed briefly in the following subsection. These test methods are available in the Code of Federal Regulations Volume 40, Part 60 or by request from Trigon.
3.2.1 Hydrogen Fluoride, Particulate Matter Sampling and Analysis Testing for hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter was performed according to EPA Method 26A. Gaseous and particulate pollutants were withdrawn isokinetically from the emission source and collected in a multicomponent sampling train. In principle, particulate matter includes any material that was condensed at or above the filtration temperature of approximately 250 degrees Fahrenheit and was collected on a tared quartz glass fiber filter. The gaseous components were then bubbled through a measured volume of 0.1N sulfuric acid and 0.1N sodium hydroxide to



# 4 /-

~ ~ 

# 0 F7Ar7

### determine moisture and hydrogen halide content of the emission source. The principal

components of the sampling system were sequentially: * A pyrex glass sample nozzle and probe liner; * A heated (248°F ±25°F) probe and filter assembly with tared quartz glass fiber filter; * An impinger train consisting of five sequential impingers. Impingers 1 and 2 containing 100 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sulfuric acid (O.1N H,SO 4 ). Impingers 3 and 4 containing 100 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sodium hydroxide (0.1N NaOH) followed by an impinger containing silica gel; and * A metering system capable of maintaining an isokinetic sampling rate and accurately determining the sample volume according to those specifications in APTD-0581. Sample clean up began iinmediately after each test run. Hydrogen fluoride was collected in the 0.1N sulfuric acid solution in impingers 1 and 2. The liquid in these impingers was measured to the nearest milliliter. The collected sample was placed in a polyethylene storage container

I 

### along with the deionized water rinse of impingers 1 and 2 and connecting glassware. The

container was sealed and the liquid level was marked. The liquid in impingers 3 and 4 was measured to the nearest milliliter. The collected sample was placed in a polyethylene storage container along with the deionized water rinse of impingers 3 and 4 and connecting glassware. ' The moisture collected by the silica gel in the fifth impinger was determined to the nearest 0.1

milligram. All collected condensate measurements were recorded on the moisture determination and sample analysis data recovery form. The hydrogen fluoride samples were transported to Trigon's Air Quality Laboratory in Charlotte, North Carolina with chain of custody documentation.

~ 

### The total fluoride samples and appropriate blank were analyzed by specific ion electrode method

~ 

### by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. personnel. Using a fluoride electrode with a standard

single junction sleeve type reference electrode and a pH meter the fluoride was determined potentiometrically. In a 150 ml beaker 50 ml of sample and 50 ml of a prepared buffer solution were combined and stirred continuously. The electrodes were immersed in the mixture and remained there until a stable reading in milligrams/liter was determined. The total fluoride was calculated and reported in milligrams. 

# 5 / 4 .1 2 7FAT

### Particulate matter that was collected on the tared quartz glass fiber filter was carefully removed from

the glass filter support and sealed in a petri dish. The nozzle, probe liner, and front filter-half of the filter assembly were rinsed with acetone into a glass storage container which was sealed and the liquid level was marked. The sample containers were transported to Trigon's Air Quality Laboratory in Charlotte, North Carolina for particulate mass determinations.
The particulate matter analyses began by transferring the acetone samples to tared beakers. These samples were taken to dryness, placed in an oven at 104°C for one hour and then placed in a desiccator along with the filters for an initial drying period of 24 hours. The particulate mass was determined gravimetrically. The tare weights of the filters and beakers were subtracted from the final weights to determine the gross particulate weight. An aliquot of the reagent grade acetone was analyzed to determine the blank correction factor. The acetone rinse (corrected for the blank) was added to the filter catch to obtain the total particulate weight. The particulate samples and method blanks were analyzed by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. personnel. The laboratory analyses and chain of custody documentation can be found in Appendix C.
3.2.2 Sampling Ports and Points 

### The dimensions of the stack and the location of the sampling ports and points are detailed in Figure 2. Method 1 sampling criteria was maintained. The stack cross section was divided into 24 equal areas. The ports were labeled A and B. During the runs each point was sampled for a period of 2.5 minutes, which yielded a total test time of 60 minutes per run.

P 

# iA 

# ~ 24'

100.5' 

## Kiln Stack



# ~ -- <- - 

# ~

B



## Figure 2 Location of Sampling Ports and Points

~

- 

### / ~7 ~ I

### 3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control



### Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc., has established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) guidelines for providing the highest quality sampling and analytical data from source tests. These QA/QC procedures were implemented to ensure the acceptability and reliability of the data generated.
In summary, a high degree of data quality was maintained throughout this project. All leak checks and isokinetic QA criteria were met. Each sampling train was leak checked prior to and immediately after sampling. Leak rates for all of the isokinetic sampling trains were less than the maximum criterion of 0.02 cubic feet per minute. All sampling rates were also within the 100% ±10% criterion established for isokinetic sampling. Quality control procedures for hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter determinations have included the analysis of a deionized distilled water blank, a 0.1N sulfuric acid blank and an acetone rinse blank. The result of the method blank is reported in Appendix C with the laboratory data.
Field data and final laboratory results were entered into Trigon's Air Quality Data System by an environmental scientist, independently audited by the Project Manager, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Manager for verification of data. After QC review by the QA Manager, the Division Manager verified the final report for completeness and reasonableness of data. The report was returned to the Project Manager for review and preparation of the final draft. The report requires the signature of the Project Manager, QA Manager, and the Division Manager before release to the client. Data and final reports are archived in a secured area for a minunum period of three years.
Trigon's field and laboratory test equipment has been maintained and calibrated in accordance with quality assurance procedures established by the US EPA in the Quality Assurance Handbook for AirPollution Measurement Systems: Volume III. Equipment calibrations including pre-test and posttest calibration data are presented in Appendix E.

8 

# 0 14

### 4.0 RESULTS

This section presents the mean hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter sampling results. Tabular results are also provided to present data from individual sampling runs collected during this project. Detailed sampling results and example calculations for the test program can be found in Appendix A. Field data sheets and sample recovery documentation are presented in Appendix B.

4.1 Summary of Results Table 1 presents the summary of r

ultsissionirate drogen fluoride an d particulate ma tt er sampling with a 2% limestone addition to the J e 8, 1995. The mean hydrogen fluoride concentration was 0.042 grains er dry ub' foot (gr/dscf). The mean hydrogen fluoride emission rate was 5.39 pounds p hou e mean particulate matter concentration was 0.004 gr/dscf. The me an pa rt iculate was 0.55 lbs/hr.

~ 

### "` -



# ~~ r ;p YI 

### Table 2 presents the summary of results from the hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter sampling without a limestone addition to the brick on June 9, 1995. The mean hydrogen fluoride concentration was 0.056 gr/dscf. The mean hydrogen fluoride emission rate was 6.83 lbs/hr. The mean particulate matter concentration was 0.009 gr/dscf. The mean particulate matter emission rate was 1.05 lbs/hr. J . CJ '1

~ /%y ✓ ~ 

### 4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results Table 1 presents the data from individual sampling runs at the kiln stack. Included in these tables are gas velocity and volumetric flow rates, exhaust gas temperatures, and particulate matter catch, concentrations, and emission rates.

E

/:

~ 

### /

### TABLE 1 

### Summary of Results, Particulate Matter Sampling Kiln Stack, Bricks with 2% Limestone Addition

Run Number 1 2 3 Date 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 Sample Identification 5104-01 5104-02 5104-03 Run Duration, Minutes 60 60 60 Sample Time, 24-hour clock 0829-0940 1021-1129 1150-1259 Percent Isokinetic 104.1 103.2 101.2 Volume of Gas Sampled, 44.44 38.68 37.34 dry standard cubic feet*(DSCF) Average Stack Temperature, °F 297.4 290.5 288.7 Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.4 32.6 32.1 Stack Gas Flow Rate, 16271 14277 14064 dry staadazd cubic feet/minute*(DSCF1Vn Stack Gas Flow Rate, 27043 23552 23229 actual cubic feet/minute(ACFM) Hydrogen Fluoride: Catch, mg 126.8 104.5 99.6 Concentration, grains/dscf* 0.044 0.042 0.041 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.13 5.09 4.95 Particulate Matter: Catch, mg 11.6 

### 12.4 9.6 Concentration, grains/dscf* 0.004 0.005 0.004 Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.56 0.60 0.48

* 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg 10

/27.

### TABLE 2 Summary of Results, Particulate Matter Sampling Kiln Stack, Normal Brick Production

Run Number 4 5 6 A v 9 (q) 5 L 

### Date 06/09/95 06/09/95 06/09/95 

### Sample Identification 5104-04 5104-05 5104-06 Run Duration, Minutes 60 60 60 Sample Time, 24-hour clock 1010-1116 1135-1241 1301-1406 Percent Isokinetic 101.6 102.1 101.7 Volume of Gas Sampled, 38.54 38.02 39.31 dry standard cubic feet*(DSCF) Average Stack Temperature, °F 289.1 294.1 292.0 29 l• 7 Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 32.9 32.2 33.4 Stack Gas Flow Rate, 14451 13829 14360 /4 ) 2~ 3 

### dry standard cubic feet/minute*(DSCFM) Stack Gas Flow Rate, 23792 23250 24138 23,7Z7 actual cubic feet/minute(ACFM) Hydrogen Fluoride: Catch, mg 135.7 142.2 144.2 Concentration, grains/dscf* 0.054 0.058 0.056 D•O 5 ~ 

### Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.72 6.83 6.95 9153 Particulate Matter: Catch, mg 22.2 18.9 23.7 ConcentFation; grains/dscf* 0.009 0.008 0.009 (2,O&g-7 

### Emission Rate, lbs/hr 1.10 0.91 1.14 ).05



### * 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg



# iz'~ ~

### 5.0 APPENDICES

This section contains detailed supportive documentation that encompasses all aspects of the emission test program. Its contents serve as the foundation for the test report. The emission test report presents a summary of the information gathered during the sampling activities. The information contained in the appendices is necessary to facilitate the review of the emission test report and determine whether proper procedures were used to accomplish the test plan objectives.
Defensible data and the subsequent pollutant concentrations and emission rates is one of the primary objectives of any emission test program. To this end, all results, example calculations, field data sheets, sample recovery, laboratory results, chain of custody documentation, and equipment calibrations have been provided to support these objectives.



### 12 r~

.



# i3'/

### APPENDIX A

SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS

A-1

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack Run Number 1 2 3 Date: 06/08/95 06/08/95 

### 06/08/95 TT Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

### PB Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.16 29.12 28.95 SP Static Pressure, in. Hg 0.018 0.018 0.018 PS Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.178 29.138 28.968 VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 46.71 41.66 40.97 DH Avg. Delta H, in. H20 2.0 1.6 1.5 TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 83.7 95.9 102.8 VSTD Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 44.44 38.68 

### 37.34 VW Volume of Water Collected, ml 122.7 107.0 101.3 VMV Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 5.78 5.04 

### 4.77 Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.115 0.115 0.113 PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 11.5 11.5 11.3 MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.885 0.885 0.887 P02 Percent Oxygen, Dry 15.7 15.4 15.3 PCO2 Percent Carbon Dioadde, Dry 1.0 1.0 1.0 PCO Percent Carbon Monoadde, Dry 0.0 0.0 0.0 

### MD Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/Ib mole 28.788 28.776 28.772 MW Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 27.547 27.534 27.552 CP Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 

### 0.84 DPS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.54 

### 0.47 0.46 

### TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 297.4 290.5 288.7 VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 37.4 32.6 32.1 AS Area Stack, ft2 12.05 12.05 12.05

.

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack
QS Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 16271 14277 14064 QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 27043 23552 23229 QSW Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 18385 16136 15860 DN Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 0.311 0.311 AN Area of Nozzle, ft2 0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 PERI Percent Isokinetic 104.1 103.2 101.2 Hydrogen Fluoride Analysis 

### FMF Hydrogen Fluoride Analysis 126.8 104.5 99.6 CAN Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.044 0.042 0.041 CAT Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.026 0.025 0.025 CAW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.13 5.09 4.95 Particulate Matter Analysis 

### FMF Particulate Matter Catch, mg 11.6 12.4 9.6 CAN Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/dscf 0.004 0.005 0.004 CAT Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/acf 0.002 0.003 0.002 CAW Particulate Matter Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.56 0.60 0.48

/-27

### SUIvIMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack Example Calculations Run 1 Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg PS=PB+SP= Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft.

17.647* VM* (PB+DH/13.6) VSTD = TM + 460 Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF VMV = 0.04709 * VW 

### = Moisture Content of Gas Stream

VMV Bws = ---- ---- -- _

VSTD + VMV Percent Moisture in Stack

100 * VMV PMV = ---- ------ ---- _ VSTD + VMV Mole Fraction of Dry Gas

100 - PMV ' MFD = ---- _

100 Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole MD = 0.44 * %CO2 + 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO2 - %02) _ Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, Ib/Ib mole MW=MD*(1-Bws)+18.0*Bws= Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec (TS + 460) 

### VS = 85.49 * CP * DPS * SQRT (PS * MV) 

### 29.178

44.44



### 5.78

0.115

11.5

0.885

28.788

27.547

37.4

A-4 

## / 3r

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack
Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 1058.82* VS * AS * PS * (1 - Bws) QS = TS + 460 Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM QA=VS*AS*60= Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM QSW = QS * [1/(1-Bws)] _ Area of Nozzle, ft2 AN = ((DN / 2) ^ 2 * 3.14159)/144 = Percent Isokinetic

0.0945 * (TS + 460) * VSTD PERI = TT*VS*PS*(1-Bws)*AN Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf (At Standard Conditions) CAN = 0.0154 * FMF / VSTD = Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr (At Standard Conditions) CAW = 0.00857 * CAN * QS 

### = Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 16271

27043

18385

104.1

0.044

6.13

f 

### ? cim 

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack Run Number 4 5 6 Date: 06/09/95 06/09/95 06/09/95 TT Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 PB Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.38 29.24 28.94 SP Static Pressure, in. Hg 0.018 0.018 0.018 PS Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.398 29.258 28.958 VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 41.05 41.33 43.25 DH Avg. Delta H, in. H20 1.5 1.6 1.7 TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 94.4 103.3 104.4 VSTD Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 38.54 38.02 39.31 VW Volume of Water Collected, ml 114.8 122.1 118.8 VMV Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 5.40 5.75 5.59 Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.123 0.131 0.125 PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 12.3 13.1 12.5 6 17,6 

### MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.877 0.869 0.875 5 P02 Percent Oxygen, Dry 15.4 15.5 15.7 

## 0 1 5• 

### PCO2 Percent Carbon Dioadde, Dry 1.0 1.0 1.0 PCO Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.0 0.0 0.0 MD Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/Ib mole 28.776 28.780 28.788 MW Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, 

### lb/lb mole 27.451 27.364 27.445 CP Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 DPS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.48 0.46 0.48 TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 289.1 294.1 292.0 Z9i 

### 7 VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 32.9 32.2 33.4 AS Area Stack, ft2 12.05 12.05 12.05

, j



### A-6 

# A/01~ 

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack
QS Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 14451 13829 14360 QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 23792 23250 24138 QSW Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 16477 15919 16403 DN Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 0.315 0.315 AN Area of Nozzle, ft2 0.00053 0.00054 0.00054 PERI Percent Isokinetic 101.6 102.1 101.7 Hydrogen Fluoride Analysis F1VIF Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 135.7 142.2 144.2 CAN Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.054 0.058 0.056 CAT Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.033 0.034 0.034 CAW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.72 6.83 6.95 Particulate Matter Analysis 

### FMF Particulate Matter Catch, mg 22.2 18.9 23.7 CAN Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/dscf 0.009 0.008 0.009 CAT Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/acf 0.005 0.005 0.006 CAW Particulate Matter Emission Rate, lbs/hr 1.10 0.91 1.14

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack Example Calculations Run 1 Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg PS=PB+SP= Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft.

17.647* VM * (PB + DH / 13.6) VSTD = TM + 460 Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF VMV = 0.04709 * VW = Moisture Content of Gas Stream



## VMV

: 

### VSTD + VMV Percent Moisture in Stack

100 * VMV PMV = VSTD + VMV Mole Fraction of Dry Gas

100 - PMV 29.398

38.54

5.40

0.123

12.3

0.877 ii ` ~ 

### Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole MD = 0.44 * %CO2 + 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO2 - %02) _ 

### Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole MW=MD*(1-Bws)+18.0*Bws= Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec (TS + 460) VS = 85.49 * CP * DPS * SQRT -_ (PS * MV) 28.776

27.451

32.9

### SUMMARY OF RESULTS EPA METHOD 26A Deterniination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions Pine Hall Brick Company Madison, North Carolina Kiln Stack
Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 1058.82 * VS * AS * PS * (1 - Bws) QS = 

# 14451

i

— t- UZI 

### Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM QA=VS*AS*60= Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM QSW = QS * [1/(1-Bws)] = 

### Area of Nozrle, ft2 AN = ((DN / 2) ^ 2 * 3.14159)/144 = 

### Percent Isokinetic

0.0945 * (TS + 460) * VSTD PERI = ------ _

TT*VS*PS*(1-Bws)*AN Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf (At Standard Conditions) CAN = 0.0154 * FMF / VSTD = Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr (At Standard Conditions) CAW=0.00857*CAN*QS= 

### Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

# 23792 16477

101.6

0.054

6.72

~ 

# E Z'MN ! „i ~

### APPENDIX B

FIELD DATA SHEETS

~

- R_i

~ 

### i _/l1 'TF 

### ~ ii 6 

## 1 8 

# I !0 !2

I 6.7 4.4 1 3.2 16 2.1
: 35.0 14.8 10.5 8.3 1 6.7 3 73.0 19.6 19.4 14.6 I 11.5
a 93.3 70.4 SZ.i =6 ~ 17.7 S SS.i 67.7 34.3 23.o 6 95.6 90.6 63.8 35.6 7 99.5 77.4 61.4 8 96.8 83.4 75.0 9 91.8 823 10 97.4 88.2 11 93.3 12 97.9

t/oeauM of Trawaa hlrs ia Raeanplar Sedu 3♦ 1 9 i 7 9 N ll l2 t :J.O t6.7 tZ1 10.0 d.7 7.1 6,3 1.6 5.0 43 4.2 1 75.0 50.0 37.3 30.0 J.0 1 .1.4 18.8 16.7 13.0 U.6 123 3 83J 62.J J00 41.7 33.7 313 27.3 1 15.0 =1 20.8
+ 873 7ao 511.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 35.0 31.3 29.2 J 90.0 75.0 6" 363 30.0 13.0

~ 09 373 6 9t.7 78.6 68.8 61.1 51.0 30.0 +3.8 7 a 929 au 93.8 1803.3 7L2 1 65.0 73.0 59.1 6LZ J4.2 62J

~ 94.4 1 113.0 1 77.3 1 70.8 J Il 93.0 Qd i 9JS 79.2 17.5 95.8 12



### 1 7 0% A 

### V i k Paint : Ya 9k a[';: ... stadc.l>3; . Shdc

ID Diatanoi i;rom

Llatdr Wa1L Mpple

[;enSth Dlatano From ` Ouraid* o( Port 

### ! r , vc, 

## ~ i. oC

F 1 

### s

~ 

### S

- 

### 7 11 -75

~ ; 1 r,t,' 11 2 7 3C

- 1 

### 2 5,

43• w

~ ~
~~~ ~~t~.~v~ ~ • •



### , 

# / --If 

# 77i I EPA Method 1 Determination of Sampling Ports and Points
Client 2-- ( 111, 1 ? .' ~ ! Ciry/State _t'c<< <wv., k1 Sampling L,ocation Date 1.: 1 l/ , Sampiing Location Dimensions: From Far Wall to Outside of Port

Nipple i.ength Depth of Duct Width (Rectangular Duct) ~l~t Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE): 2 s LenBth x Widtb 2( -)( - ) 

# DE_ .__--._----_ ..--- = -------------------------- = nl tL

Lsnsth + Width ( _ + - )

Distance From Ports to Nearest Flow Disturbance: Upstream Downstream Dimensions in Inches 6w Z4 `► GO ;" Duct Diameters 

### 34

- 

### 5 , r - 6.

~ - 1 

### 2.1 1 4 Stack Area. in Square Feet 1 ti•t75 Calculations By aL+J 

### ~ -•• U ' --- 

### ~



## ~

`,.



## ~ c.. •

I i

~

Sclltmatic of SamplinB Locatioa

l.oeatlon of Tra.ersa Poina In Greular StaeksN
Q 

## = n --4 

## g cl) 

# , D . m

~ 

### ; m

I ~ ~

~ 

### C G

~ 

# 2 C1~

~ m ~ D 3 ~ T ~ Q O 3 ~

~ 

### r Q

~ Q 

## Cn ~ C

~ Q 

### > Z

. 

## n

~ Q N7

~ 

## D Z rTi 

### m
r 7.1 

## CA O Q



### ~ GJt

N O N

1b

~ N t77

~ 2 CC

~

~ 7

~ Q' ~
N
O
~

~

~ ~ 3

~ Q C

~

~ ~ N p Q

. C n
N

~ 1

~ ^ = r ~ n C C c~
~ Q D 

### 3 m

~ m O Q C/7 C 7 CI! -i

~ m > 3
O

~ 3

Q t < Q
~
~ C

~ Q D



# _ ~ N ~

~ 

### * Q N7 

### D Z

~ T 

### D

— MINIMUM NUMBER aF TRAVERSE POINTS 

### `+

o r

~ ~ 7 0 

### o a

n 3 r A

~ p
n p 7

~ y r r A

~ 

### ~ g g, 

# y

~ ~

~
y C A W
~ 

### o C ~ 

### >•

> ~ X

• ' ~ 

## ~ rm ~

~ II A '~ a 

# J C 

# ~ O

O j fZ
~ 

### Tl

~

~

~ V O aa

~ p 3
IV

~

~ ta 

## I * I

~ O IV Cr+



### ~~~ ~

## EP.A .tilethod 2

Determination of Stack Gas Velocity, Volumetric Flo w Rate and Cvclonic Flo w

Client '~'~ ..- ~ ~~~ ~ ' ~ . , , 'i Sampling Location y ' . ~ ~ : r. ~ - Run Date 1, / .sf ' - i - Barometric Pressure. in. Hg 2 0 + Stacic Pressure, in. H,0 4 - c. zs Pitot Tube [.D. No. ' r'/ %. W': Date Calibrated Stack Dimensions. in., diameter/side 1 ~ + Ciry/Srzm Operators Time 

### C' '< Stack Pressure, in. Hg 

### Z` i. I z y Static Pressure. in. Hg 

### ^ Cl X Pitot Tube Coefficient. C. 

### !` sf Leak Check. in H ; 0 <0.1 ® 

### 4.1 Side 3. in. 

### k/,L 

### Field Data

Trarerss Pbint Vumber Velocitf Hmd 0p Incha

H 2 O Staek

Temperature'l► Cyeloele FTov Detamiaadwt 6p; at 0 1 ReLetmte Ang1e Whkh Ykida a`iull Ap

### ► 0. u. ,. s ~ 

### 2. u, v C.

~ 

### U

~ 

### v71 0.01 C G r S

41 o. ~ o. 01- 0• c1 7 lc

0. ' Zel 7 Z L 

### < C , Z 0.'4 SSc L5F C. p. S Z9 0

~ 0' O

~ C , '4- zsZ U. 09 5 Cl. 7 R G IL G.Z C; , •3z .29d 0 b.c,c I'7 d

+~ O•14 0.25 1-5 1 7 25T 0-L! m 0. UZ + 2 U. 1-4 G• zS LS zq U. 0 L G. 0 Z

A.entta. f: • ? q ~~ I~ , r 7

U~ 

# i

~ ~" Snck Temperature. Dry, a F (A) 

### ~ 2 3S Stack Tempecaaue, Wec °F (B) Difference (A - B) Percent Moismre 

### '1

I co mments gjn!.

- 

# 'Cl

,_G7



# _c
J

~ U c

~ ~ a~ ` a~

~~ walsAS 

### iodeA ja1aM 

### - jry u/ ainisioyv %
,

~ ~ ~ Q t'1 • N ~ O

/ / / / /

~

e 

### o ~ / 

### N ' j s6aJ69(7 

### `(nn1 - pl) n ,a Q ,

... 

### o N 0 / ~ ~ ~

o rn Ln /



### a 

# / / 

# U 

# = a 

# c

/ •~ ~

~ 

# o
~h's a •~ y

~

ti ° '

.

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

~

m 

### o ~

~ e ~ 

### eb . 0

-~ 

### o C o + c r, 

### j saaj6ao Mi `ainlajaduwal qln8 1aM , c1, 

### ~ • ' , '

## EPA Method 3A 

## - Molecular Weight Determination - Data Analysis

Client Name City/State 

### Sampling Location

~ 

### '- 

### Sample Type 0, Bag ti1 Multipoint o Single Point Analyzer Type Serial # 1%- - . i- f s 

### Project Number Sample Date f: 

### Operator J Q. 

### Fuel Type 4A



### ~ 

### ; 0 2 Calibration 20.9 t 0.1 %

Sample ID Niunber Rum

Number Oxygen.

Analyzer Fyrite::

Analyzer F. % a_: % COZ
ti~.~ 

### -,; ~ 

### ! S. ~ 

### , v N ~ 

### <► rc:_c;, ~ ^ r~~ r ~ ~A

t



### Note: Calculate the F o before evacuating any bag samples. Compare the F o to the expected fuel values. If a discrepancy exists, reanalyze the sample. The F o calculation is as follows:


### 20.9% - %0, F o 

### = _ --- % CO3

Discrepancies or comments should be noted below: F

. Ran es For Common Fuels Anthracite Coal and Lianite 1.016 - 1.130 Bicuminous Coal 1.083 - 1.230 Disdllate Oil 1.260 - 1.413 Residual Oil 1.210 - 1.370 Wood 1.000 - 1.120 Wood Bark 1.003 - 1.130 Narural Gas 1.600 - 1.836 Pro ane 1.434 - 1.586 Butane 1.405 - 1.553 

# F7-A& 7_

## EPA Method 3A - Molecular Weight Determination - Data Analysis

Client Name City/State l~' ~ : •<,:. i ~~ 

### Sampling Location Sample Type ©; Bag ar Multipoint a Single Point Analyzer Type ,1-;- f '

~ > 

### Serial # .Z!.; % 7-1 ? 

### Project Number 1-4i. 11

- 4 

### Sample Date Operator _ I f 

### Fuel Type INA 

### 0 O Z Calibration 20.9 t 0.1 %

Sample ID Number Run,

Number. Oxygea.:

Analyzer Fyrite.

. Analyzer.. F Q % OZ %. G0 2

r ~ '71 ( , a • 4 lJ.h



### Note: Calculate the , F o before evacuating any bag samples. Compare the F, to the expected fuel values. If a discrepancy exists, reanalyze the sample. The F o calculation is as follows:

20.9% - %O Z 

### F , = --- ----

% CO Z

Discrepancies or comments should be noted below: F

. Ran es For Common Fuels Anthracite Coal and Lianite 1.016 - 1.130 Bituminous Coal 1.083 - 1.230 Distillate Oil 1.260 - 1.413 Residual Oil 1.210 - 1.370 Wood 1.000 - 1.120 Wood Bark 1.003 - 1.130 Nacural Gas 1.600 - 1.836 Pro ane 1.434 - 1.586 Bucane 1.405 - 1.553

I

-

### EPA :Ylethod 26A -ititoisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis i Clieut vame P'~ ~L, ~ ;•~' ~ Project Number

~ CiryiState r Sample Date Sampliag Location r Samples Recovered By C1ean-Clp Box vumber 414 Recovery Date i ; !_ % - Cliain of Custodv: Date Received c: (,

- d ) `~ - S•) — Received Bv a«- Locked? ✓ 

### Equipment Documentation {i/ T T1 Run vumber Sam le ID vumber Sam le Bot Number Probe NumbCr C- I .? 

### Analysis of Moisture Recovery ReaQent Recoverv Container Im inoer Absorbitig Solution k/ F ~ ~ "~ •:.. : 41

~ •, ti. % r11

. ~ ~ ''. J I ! ; ; ~~ Descriotion of ReaQent r Rea¢ent Level Marked? V V ✓ Final Volume. ml Initial Volume, ml " cc Net Condensed Volume. ml 15 Reaizent Rtcoverv Container # ? ? u Im inger Absorbinz Solution ~.~ :•.~ '-f~ -!!u Ne'' -+ C•.I iu ,V, Llu ,• ~ ,. N". Descri tion of Rea ent c(• ! C(,

. r

~ - - Rea ent Levet Marked? ' ✓ ✓ Final Volume. ml 

## '°= icc l r c.

~ c : Initial Volume, ml Net Condensed Volume. ml Silica Gel Recoverv Container Z 'a Percetit Silica Gel S ent Final WeiQht. Q 2 1 "' -7 Initial Wei ht. z Lsv.'r ?c-1.7.0 Net Absorbed Water. e ` ~ ~' r'_ G % • ' '! '1 TotalRea2entCollected.Y ° 

### Sample Reeovery
Recoverv Container #► /7- 3 ~ Rinsin Solution i.'

~ -C i -, ,_ i`► rF~ ~•
~ ' Sam le Container Sealed? Liauid Levei 'Marked? " '- t,
~ ` 

### Reagent Blanks
Absorbinz Rea ent Blank -r
~ J N• Rinsin Rea ent Blank Absg' 

### c binLr Blank Identificacion # r:.a - , : -1 Rinsin 131ank Identification # <

- 6.• 1 AbsAinz Rea ent Blank
:.~ 1kj ^l,- '} Rinsine Reaizent Blank A k nl Absoi6in¢ Blank IdentiFcation # Rinsine Blank Identification # - :.

~ +

A / ) / / ~

I[a rl II Qi ~r I / l! L1

~ 7 ! 1. V

. ..;',.

. :: : Reviewer (ititiaLs T'` ~ •; `,-:::..:.:.: . 

### A~
! 

# m

### E'P.-I .tilethod 26,4 -:tiloisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis

. ~ Clieut Name D•

~ L - — Project vumber %' 41 ,-<;C r~•~ CiryiState Sample Date _ 4 Sampliug , Location Samples Recovered By

~ • :- Cleau-Lp Box iNumber Recovery Date Chain of Custodv: Date Received OC- SS Received By 1 - C Locked? ~ 

### Equipment Documentation
Run Number ~ ~• Samole ID Number < ItA la., Samole Box Vumber 10

~ Probe vumber o'" l 7.W 01 4 

### Analysis ojiYtoisture Recovery
Reasent Recoverv Container ~ C= Imoinszer Absorbiqz Solutioii r,.t Q :t- <.G,j r.. )J Descriotion of ReaQent clrc.r 1.k;,' Rea¢ent Level Marked? ✓ ~ Final Volume, ml 3CC ~~'► Initial Volume, ml 7fic r' vet Condensed Volume, 4 7 Rza , zenc Recoverv Container ~ 6 Im inoer Absorbinz Solution '. I

~ l 1

~ 1.•C 116 r r V Descriotion of Reastent Reaizent Level 'Vfarked'.' ✓ ✓ Final Volume. ml ZII

~ ,... Initial Volume. ml ~ ' SCU Z ' Net Condensed Volume. ml Silica Gel Recoverv Container Perceeit Silica Gel Soent Final WeiQflt. 2 Initial Wei¢ht. z

~ ix.- ~ u'

~ •c. vet Absorbed Water. Q +' f+' T•otal ReaQent Collected, st ' 

### Sample Reeovery Recoverv Container $

~ Rinsin¢ Solution 01 I (` Samie Container Sealed? Liouid Level Marked? 

### Reaaent Blanks

E3 5 *4 — " "' Riasine Blank Identi C-1 ^J. N Rinsinz Rea e ¢ nt Bla lank Identification * 

### 5

- 1_

- 4 Riasin¢ Blank Identi # I CP 1 _4- IL

eviewer ItiiiiaLs 

# QA R_'7 

### i 

# ~ I TFU[

~ 

### OlVlsokz'netic Field Data Sizeet - EP.A Method

C:ier t ~ 

### . ~ 

### '- ^ ~'~~'- Run vumber
~ CicyrState `,~ ~ ~ ,~ ^ 1 

### ^ -- --- - - Date ( s

,, , Sampling Location ~ ' ~' ~ Operators Amo. Temp ..° F 7 1

_ NOMOGRr1PR SET-UP LEAR CREC%S Bar. Press., In. Hg. 14,4 aH ® Y Avg .1 P (; ~c: Pre-TestC_ ~ i~ ® r< — In. Hg. Static Press.

, In. H : 0 ~ e,=~ Meter Temp. X~ ~ Ref A P C —4. Post-Test 9 5 In. Hg. Meter Box No. Stack Temp. Noz. Dia. Desired C ~ t Pre-Test Pttot <0.1 (2 ~.~-~ In. H,0 Sample Box No. I Pitot Coeff. Nozzie Diameter r) •) 'ri Post-Test Pitot <0.I ® ~9 In. H 2 0 Probe/Pitot Yo. ?j

- •6 C•' Z. `lo Moisture ~ Nozzle No. ~~ ,- OkN Tedlar Bag No. ~ Probe Temp. SettingZ

~ ~ _ C Factor I ~~ 3 Orsat System Pr? Bag Leak Check ✓ Sample ID No. r Start T'utte C' Q? 7 End Time (: ' Observer Rk. ~
Sataple Point Clbck.

Tima D r

. y . Gas Nteter Cubic: Feer. Pitor

Aeading Q P Ia: H.O Orifice

: Setting.at

~ . Inchex FI,O Idbai Acaial• D rY Gas Mecer Tetnperature.'F Intet Ouder Pump

Yacuuat Iaehes Ha Stack

Temp• •F Filter Box •F Imp. Temo ''F'

~ i 1 7' C. Z c ~ I. S ~~ .'~C; ~~ 1,.4 C. —"► 3 Z 6.)

< 4l; 49 o, 1 

### qL l.S • 1( ~ 7~ S J'q► 

### z i4 ` 3 "~ 63

4~ ~.~' Zq r ( '0 u -7.4 I I > > ~ . tu TT 1 - 5'

~ )0 ~ ;e'

~ - (

~ . zG Z. Le: I 7 : 1 - (e L! L..:5 Z

- 7

~ u; SCci C. 53 Z 7c: •'; ''

~ 4 z , 4y e ~ 3

~ 7;; SI I.

~ (c C.' I•yf• I•yC (~ ~l ( L

~~ .? 'S'u "S

C.L'f 1,

~ T I, S S"1

- 1Y /.. 3CC 10

• . L 1.30 C

I, 3C q: '1 ti `l . c c zss ~ I t: I

~ c• S G. L7 . Z3 1.4c I.S ~ y 3G 1.0 28~ zu_

~ ?,r S2Z.I ~ C. 7 ZG Z-2c;' G

~ L 7• ( ~ ~ ?y.,r. 41 .; ~ 1.=0 ;. ~~ 1.Z 41 1d'' Sz U 0> r r. ~ G 5 SL ~ 2ti ~ 2%4? ss

LS l, ' ~ l.

~ ; ~ I r

~ L (s

~

1 '_ri 3- L4G G I I.q

.~ ;s y2 Z.2C Z

? ~ ~ 1 $~ g.; Z e ~ Z G4
7 7 ~ a• C,, > ~

~_ ~'r

~ 0 Gl G cs r ' 1 C

~ l ,, S; -. ~? ~ S" 1 2 Z 6- G 1Q r! -7 -7 7. fo , 2S1 64

; - UC;• tC 'L ? 2 yC 9 C, ~G ~ . 2 3
~ ,: 44 z'.S 4 1. L.i , 0 z I 2 , , :! L o J c 7 l i C a + : 14 3

u (: . 

### _. , - ~ 

### L5

~ 

### •

~ 

### ,,

~ A .~~ l.:J ~ S. 'k ' :. (_ _,. V ,• ~

~ .C lsolcinerie Field Data Sheet - EP.-I .tilethod _'- , . ~ Clienc ^ 1, ,~ -," Run v urnoer Z Ciry/Srace ~ r . . I , .. r ; i Dace ~ ~ ~ l ;• ,J [ ' Sampling Locacion

- G; L , ' Operacors Amb. Temp.. °F iVOMOGR.•1P1YSE7TUP LEeLRC1gECXS Bar. Press.. In. Hg.= 5 ''- _ oH ® 1;'z ti_ Y Avg A P Pre-Test In. H

~ , • Sracic Press.. In. H,0 ' ~• ~ 5 Meter Temp. ~~ Ref ~ P ~ — t~ C'- ~ Posc-Test In, H

~ •

~ Meter Box No. 0 C Smek Temp. 3cC.' Noz. Dia. Desired
r• u
. Pre-Tesc Picoc <0.1 ® In. H,0 Sampie Box Vo. "—' Piioc Coeff.

~ 2 4 Nozzle Diameter Posc-Test Pitoc <0.1 ® In. H = 0 Probe/Pitoc No. 1. CC G? I % Moisture , Nozzie No. Tedlar Bag No. z Probe Temp. Setting l tiZ C Factor Orsat System S;?Z Bag Leak Check LI -I Sample ID No. ti%1 J- c;''>_ Statt T'une I

~ `.' f Hnd Time r~~~ Observer U%,_

Satapte Painc Clnck.

Time Dr.y Gas

Meur Cuhic: Feec. Pitoc

Reading a P Itc: H:O Orifcce

Setdaq. aH Iitcbes EI 0 Cdeat Actuat Drq Gat Mecer Tecaperature.'F Cntet Oudet Putap

Vacuum Iaches Ha Stack Temp, 'F F4Imr Boz '1~ Iinp. Temn 'F

. T9 

### 31 SU ZF7- ZZS & 7 ;1 ~ -IQ1 1-3c 'u`X. j 1 C. t'1 r7

- < I• 25 G Y 2 G 7 b 1 , 31-

~ -7, Cz:•&4 : . I~~ 1 .Ic' 

# i.li 5. ~ 

# 7" 7 2 _; 5r

~~ ~ C ~ ~ 1 (i• 11
~ .`iL ~ 4~ y. ~ 24a

- 7 5 7

SCZ _, isl ci Zti - 7 LUO SZ _7 c' S'S" 1 ~ C. :'$ Z.oG ?.c

~ 6 r t[., ciG

~ .O 1s; ~ )u4

~ 1 ~ .< Sir 7 C

~ ? L.

~ — Z•. S y ~ a() r,L

~~ )t , ~ ys

~ . c ZC1

.► G La? ?y 57
r• '7< , l3

~ .Ltr

~ .1C

~ oI C4 U

R SG Z lr (: . ~ ~, 7 lr 2.

. ~ S G•c; 1•crt• C,L c? c —~ ?s~~

~ Ji. ( 0

~ L.5 5

~~ b. Lk c`. 2,1

~ r-1 n

. i,l

- 1 ~ .; l 1 Re
~ /i•F

~ 1 " ~ /../';

. ^ n 7 C. Ct

t ~ S - l

~ 7 , L' w 7 ~ ~•I~: ' ~ .IL !br

-7 e J

. -3 32 7.;5' 1•3S

-- C;.4

~ 3 Z•o Z,uc !o C q< /. ` 'S%. 214

- 7 /,j

2~ -4 Y I

~ . < S ~ ~, ~% ( ~. I~F ( 9 0

. 19:7

ct~ r'1

~ • r ~ I, t, I. t: ; ~ •, `1-7 (,S

77 VF

~~ U r.i/ ~ lC~ 5? S.0 '' ; ~~C Gti

J


# e I A

- ) 1 •~`~ 1 ~ ~ "?t ' ~ ~~.



### A'k. ~;l.~l. ~~ I~ 

### ,•,
~ 

### '-

~ 

### - C 

# * 

# w

l ti%1. lsokznetzc Field Data J/reer - EP.A .bletitod ?L:.'%

~ - ` Clier.c

~ ns_ - n r ~ < Run vumoer ~ CiryrStace Date Sampling Location I !_7 N Operators

- ~ a==

~ aa=aaa

~ 3 =a=aaa

~ aaa

~ aaasammzaaa ~a=~a3~a~ 33e=a

~ ==a=

~~ aaa =a=

~ 3
~ =3a

~ = ,,...o. Temp.. °F 

## ` ,VOMOGRAPR SET-UP LE.•I,R CHECKS Bar. Press., In. Hg. ~~ 

## '
~ OH ® ~ `'~ ~ Y = ~ 

## r_ c Avg ~ P /` '— Z Pre-Tesc [n. H2. Stacic Press.. Ia. H 2 O 

## =ti Meter Temp. Ref a P Posc-Test (2 

## 1. . (n, H,,

~ Meter Box No. 

## ZLr •1:'_ Stack Temp. Noz. Dia. Desired Pre-Test Pitoc <0.1 ® _~ 

## J, `i In. H.0 Sample Box No. Pitoc CoePf. 

## G 0

~ 

## = Nozzie Diameter Posc-Test Picot <0.1 ® (n. H ; 0 Probe/Pitoc No. 

## ?L%' 0?` 1 95 Moisture Nozzie No. 

## Z<.:G GfS Tedlar Bag No. I Probe Temp. Setting 

## ' 7 `? C Factor ~•~ 

## ti`' Orsac System Bag Leak Check ~ Sampie ID No. Start Time End Time 

## 17 5
~ Observer

D ry Gas Pitor Ori fi ce Dry Crds. Puutamp Stack Flter Imp. Satnp[e Clock. Meuc Aeading Seaing, oFf Mecec Vacuum. Temp Box Temp Potnt Titru Cubia. Feet

. ~ P Inches. EI,O Tetaoetantre °F Ituhes °F °F °F In: FF,O Ideal Actual Infei Ourlet Hg 4 I F

~ .ti 3 ls i,''C l.

~ u 5

. ' 4.

~ Z '

~ S`► 

## 1. c'S '_4 I.
~~ 

## . t,< lc:' 2 , 11 2J4 i S~ 

## _ /6 i IIC•
; IG 5 1 ~ ~ ?~

. /.

~ S 1 ~ ,r• ~ q? Sti ? ~. 'c~ tF G•c 2c , 6I

~ ~' ~5~ S5 ~ ;.;!i : I
~ •' I ~5 ~;. ~ ~i ,. , ~~ :?ti I G>;= -Y .~

~ .0 , ~~~ /./.0 I;! , c •

, 17 C: lsCi 1 _ S e z ~ I, C 1 ~~ ~ ,=, 9'i i•. ~ 7 i: dS I C ~

r 0

~ S`

~ y`i

~ L 10

~,. lL ' l,r 61 z -, ~• ;~ ~ 7
: /_. (y ~l~ -7 L: I '_ C F7
7 II ~~ . ?. )- C..l

~ ./•5 C i ~ If./. lcx,

~ .iJ ?t !
t,f 74 1 'i" r<.' /• l

~ L:
7 i~ /;~~•`~d '•~ I l , •c '-0 / ~~ Jc'f ~.~ ~;~; ,~~ 5 1

, q ~ :.~ ~ ~.+ /: ~ /,.1 /,•.l` 7 ;
~ cti

~ Z

~ 7

- 7 

# I ~ a~~ / ~ , ~ -! G ` ' ,, ! ~ !•~ ~ ~ ' !i

~ 'f ~ -!i 1 "l ~ -~~~~ ~ 7

~ 7

- 4~ G'~.c'~ ~ ' 3

i2 ~~~ C:G.S` r.

~ G I,Z'S ,?'~ ~i~ ir.,'_ : ?a: ~..~~ `~,

~ C~- ~ I - ~• r T~ ;i ~ -j

~ 

## h CG Otr

, 

# / n ilsokinenc Field Data Sheet - EP.A .tletnod "1

--~ - ~ Ciienc ~ ' ti- I ' , Run Numbe; " CiryiState P/! - Date S' 

## % `

~ 

## ._ Y ~ Sampling Location

~ —__ _ - - _ Operswrs 

### QLL, nb Temp. °F 1 7 4 ~ NOMOGRAPfISET-UP Bar. Press.. In. Hg.''% ! AH ®` Y

~ , Static Press.. In. H : 04_., Meter Temp. I T ~ Meter Box Yo. CL. Stack Temp. L`iC Sample Box No. Pitot Coeff. Probe/Pitot No. 2-1Y;. C-- % Moisture ' Probe Temp. Seaing Z t: C Factor t ~ Sample ID No. <

1 / =' '

~ '

~ = Stut Time I ~► I: LE•1R CHECKS Avg .1 P C) L'

! , Pre-Test 0 C 1:. ® r"7 - In. Hg. Ref a P C L k Post-Test -S In. Hg. Noz. Dia. Desired ~ -~^'~~ : Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 ' rn. H,p Nozzle Diameter%' Post-Test Pitot <0.1 In. H ; 0 Nozzle No. Tedlar Bag No. _- Otsu Systetn Bag Leak Check ✓ End I"ime -+4 11 i! _ Observer r
Satnple: Point CWck.

T'une D 

### ry Gas

Meur Cubic: Feet Pitoc

Aeading Q P In: FF.O Orifice : Setdag.

~ Inches. K O rdeaf Actoal Dry Cras Meter Temperature. °F rhlei Otttfet Ptuap

Vacuum Inclies He Stack Temp. °F Filter Box. °F Imp. Temp °F 

### A i .; . ot

~ 

### :. z ~ 

### 1.9r 1,3 ~ s1 ~~i ~~ ~;~ ?3 . , c - ,
•,. 

### i , s<' I•SS 83 ?5 q L`l l 3 < 1 . iy. ,5 c. Z ~ 

### r. S ~ I.~~. iy y /.,1 

### •3 I T ~ 

### i zu ; z L-IC

U ~ ~.S

~ tr .:c c•', Li 2.4r, Tz \ 1 0- G I 1 i1, 1i, 1•^G '76

, ~~ ~5' Tc 41 yIJ. U G. 4. l.

~ n I'v

~ i%

~~ I ,. ~ ' 2g 3, -1 4 ,1

~ ?.o &w<, 9'1 ~ I I. I -c 1.16 zSa 

### 2S'L Go G ZZS 64

- 7 5 2 O ZL (.-:< .j< q-1 U 6.2 Iy'l t - ~ - Sp GI LS ~ z ~ 6.r3 I~T - I, C' 1 16, 7 — zs& 3cl Gr 

### ,L i,y ~ .~~ r~. ~ ~5 7•c /. 3< 1

- 7 C 1 7 (
~ • U 1$C 2 ~ ! C

~ - 7 2.5 4 .54. 35' o,l' ,k. ! tG I„7 92- ..c: '9r zS► U z 3' < G 5S. 94 I. Ce !C 5 z.es ,+ 4

. - S' 7.14L ic4 1i

I Z S (c t: t; 2. ;>> l. 1. s Icr,

- 7 ! C 4td

~ - (.o.95 c. ~ ~ I. ,, ~ .► -r, ~ !• 7 ; b ~ .~ .tir

~~ ! 7 I ~ ~ ~ ..•_ , ; . 2 ~ I.~ , ,-; ~ , 5 ~ ~ ~ z ~F ~;~ (IT_

~ t G ~c ~. ~ < ; G, ~ ✓ l. C I ' ~ ' ~ c f~ E. 1 ° -' ) `'i ~ I S lsr11. 1 s 1 ~ 1. ~G !~~ ri! iti

~ . I ~r~ ?s► G ~ I I ZS G k.7 ~ ~ . Z L I.~S ~~ ":~ 4=~ (. I •'•SY ~ ='1 r.-1 r L 7•t (: L. c L4'i 10 uT

3v h •r ' -6 5

u!c G ~~ I y • ; ci i 4


# QA a~j ~~ 

# - 0 ( ~ 

# - IZ

- ~ 

# is rgd 

### B-11 ~

-

- .lsokfneric Field Dara Sheet - EP.-I .6ferhod z (-, IlClient

- ~~ r.~ Run `tun:oer Ciry/State 

## r'; . ~ ,~ Date Sa^nling Location Operators Amb. Temp.. °F 

# t (_

~ NOMOGRAPH SET-UP LE.•IK CHECXS Bar. Press., In. Hg. 

# '-ti '% 4 AH ® 

# I''' :; y a 

# `.< Avg A P G~~ Pre-Test

~ ", i 1 f ® J In. H 4• Static Press.. In. H : O f__ ' = Meter Temp. Ref a P =•=~ ~ Post-Test 

# !._(: 1 C ~ 

# `` In. Hg. Meter Box No. Stack Temp. 

# "_`ic. Noz. Dia. Desired Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 ® 

# y In. H,0 Sample Box No. 

# = Pitot Coeif. Nozzle Diameter 

# C Post-Test Pitot <0. I® 

# S.Li In. EI_0 ProbelPitot No. % Moisture Nozzle No. Tedlar Bag No. 

# / Probe Temp. Secting %

~ ~ _ C Factor 

# 1,0
~ Orsat Systrm -Z7f. , %'` Bag Leak Check 

# ✓ Sample ID No. 

# < r ca - C 5' Start T

- nne 

# r'
- ~ 

# C End Time 

# !.'_ J

' I Observer 

# N=. if

Sample Poinc. Ctock:

Time. Drg Gas

Meter Cubic: Feer Pitoc

Reading a P In: ig.0 Orifice

Setsing aFl: rnches. 9 ;0 Ideat Actnal Dry Cras Meter Tetnperaaue °F tntet Oucfet Pump

Vacuum: Inches Ha Stack Tem_p °F Filter Bo F z ° Imp. TeFp '
4 r C .7? . ~C~ C I; C S ~ G.s ~ q 1 9( ~ r~ . ; z• ~ 5 z1.5
~ ~ L C, I?. D S l Olq'I

14 9&I &. S't o.?') 1 C i q`1 3 L".4 L1 ?

~ c '7; a.5' '7 n;t u~ S3 ! i. ~ ~ l,( . r1 ~~ f~ li i I,• I r C

~ `i: !p(i 4.9 L_•i ~ J? 'i ~

~ r•~ , v.; ~f ~ C.. :1 i `15 ~ 9~~ I!4 ia

. ~ ~ `t i •, ,.i: :Z 31 d ZQ '/: G.oc l

~ ? !cr ,.G ~ti~ ZS1 ,--7

l~ (C~ ' -- ~ n LZ I 1.

~ : I,L

~ • 1 6 1 Z



### _ ,, ,«; r, ~ ~~~ rl~~-► 

### r,? lc ~~ ~cz S.t

~ ; 77.; 6k

. , ~- ; , r L' ~

~ , ~ ,:•r -, ZC

~ ,?;; ~ 7 t C

. l

~ .'. a:.

~ ,

c,•i- 3C ~ J-,
~ ,. ~ S Vhi 24 r 7.1, 77 i

~ v` icc ii.G 2 7uZ

~ 4

,. ( 5i. 31 r. 3,, , , v t.1C ti r L 9 9 3.1 / Zc; L.2.v 210 r.1 Icl (.' :o ~ 2 , 9 1 C—
r_
~ S

~ 6

11 3 ~ '703 33 c Z ~ r. ~ ; ~., rr~ ci ~ 3c~ i~'7
C -+ :- ~ i•,' I'. C,IC r r 1, U , 1 u r,.G 4 ' l

. , i~ Z , I S

. =' "1• 23

_ 14. —

cJ /, ~ i I ~7~ r '2 I/

~ i. .'

~ 5 Z~ i , ,vti 67 

### 3L•

4 ' ',t L•
~ L t `i • IL ;; ?c

~ .I ~

~ C} ' • ~ ' A ~J~ fCC C'(j2

- l2•

— iS_ 

# J

~

- IIsokinetic Field Data Sheet - EPA .Nethod '! ' Client

~ ' ' " I Run Number ~=

, City/State U' ': c ~ ~ i;- Date Sampling Location I: i ~ ''T• - Operators 3-+.,

~ r ~ a s a a s a a a s s a a a a x a s s a a a a s a a s a a a a a s a a s v s a a a a a a s a a a s a s s a a a a a a a a a a a= e Amb Tem 0 12 1' NOMOGRAPH SET-UP

. p.. Bar. Press., In. Hg. 'S.`

_! `i

_ OH ® '•` 1 " ~ Y a Static Press., In. H = 0 r:._= Meter Temp. '^ Meter Box No. ~ t'~ ~ +:• ~ Stack Temp. ?+= Sample Box No. r_ Pitoc Coeff. Probe/Pitot No. 9° Moisture ~ Probe Temp. Setting 2

1 C Factor ' uc Sample ID No. Start Time j 3 ~ LEAg CHECSS AvgOP : ?? Pre-Test -% _ C- ® 1! In. Hg. Ref G P C•, z 5 ~ Post-Tesc L c ® In. Hg. Noz. Dia. Desired L

i!: r Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 (D In. H,0 Noule Diameter t) . :S!C Post-Test Pitot <0.1 0 ' 1 `>' In. H,0 Nozzle No.

. 1

00 C``f :' Tedlar Bag No. ~ Orsat System i,•<. N'^ Bag Leak Check ✓ Bnd Time I'= r.a •• Observer !y%..

Sampie. Point Clbck.

Titnc Dry Oas::.

Meter Cubtc. Feec -`' Pitoc

Raadmg a: P Ia. ff.0 Orifice .

. Setting• IIff Inches H 1 0 Idesl Actual Dcq Crss: Meter:. Temperantre

~ °F InIet Oatler Pumg

Vacttwir. Inches H Stack:

Temp °F Filter Box °F

~ _ Iinp.. Temp °F

~ ~ i~ . i.S C.•l.'- I, ~~ i r:c 90 Y~ ). Z 2t0 C.< } i , -► 4 Z ' ~ Z ~ ~ •- ~~ / e z t).!c;, f,qc I. ~ 1 u rJA , ic' S`S 2~ Y 241

~ ;!

~ ) ~~ Q.

~ ~ ~.'I~ ~ • i~ ~~'~ ~ 

### S Z1 -1 '~~T/ •~l

- 2.cs - 10 rrc 2y

~ - 25c

~ =ti 7
c -► -, c `•' ,:. -, 1

~ 'S 5
~ t

_ ~ i ' ; ,Z '7

C..
S ~ - ~~ 5s is ~.~_. rv~ ~~. )~° ~.~ Z4 Z!:~q - 

### c.c, 

# 1

- ; %>! .__Z ( o

z. t ~ ~ 

## . ~ 

## s i. r

~.~~ ~ i : re: 7

~ Li Z.

Z 1 ~: ~ 1~ ~ l '~ 1~

~ • C. ~ I(;

. G j' 4 ) C ~ M~ 7~~~ Z~ 1 /. 7

~ ~~ l :~l • Z•~ 

## C. ; •,

~ .!'i I ~ ~ ,, 

## ic,:-

~ 

## ,G • ~_S~ ~ci~ ,

f tjc 

### x 

## ('`G l
~~ 

## 'CC J ci _ v ~ ~y~► 

## '

o:5 7 rcc , i•643 e: r ~ ~.d~ i u(, 34 Z .> L Z ~`~

i,- r '° ~ ~ /`. ~ L'i3 7 :1 Y

, -3; i: 7 5 3 

## ';; '
~ I ~ ~ 7 1 2 LI<

~ 1 % ; i3

~ ► C ~

~

,. 

## u74 r ~~+• ~~ ~•~~', ~



## a~C~c~ h -~~.~ 

## 0ts

- 12

- t)~ 

# F7=

4 

### /4-k'

### APPENDIX C

LABORATORY DATA

## i 

# I - 'TRIGON

. 

### EPIGIPIEERING COl`lSC1LTAPlTS, II`{C.

1920 Starita Road, Suite J- Charlotte, N.C. 28206 •(704) 598-1049
June 13, 1995 

### REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS

Mr. Vernon Moore Pine Hall Brick Post Office Box 336 Madison, North Carolina 37205
Trigon Project No.: 46-95-104 Trigon Project Name: Kiln Stack June 1995 Trigon Sample Number: 5104-01B 5104-02B 5104-033 5104-04B Date Collected: 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/09/95 Description: Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 0.1N H : SO, O.IN H : SO, 0.1N H,SO, 0.1N H,SO, 

### and Rinse and Rinse and Rinse and Rinse 

### Inorsanic Analvsis Date Analyzed 06/ 13/95 06/ 13/95 06/13/95 06/ 13/95 EPA Method of Analvsis 340.2 340.3 340.2 340.3 Units Fluoride as F- mgil 251 139 188 263 I Volume of Solution 1 0.505 0.553 0.530 0.516

Fluoride as F- mg 126.3 104.5 99.6 135.7

~ Trigon Sample Number: 5104-05B 5104-06B 5104-07 5104-09

Date Collected: 06/09/95 06i09/95 06/09/95 06/09/95 

# ~ Description: Run 5 Run 6 Blank Blank O.IN H z SO, 0.1N H,SO, O.IN H,_SO, D1 Water 

### and Rinse and Rinse 

### Inorganic Analvsis 

# ~ Date Analyzed 06113/95 06/13/95 06/14/95 06/14/95

EPA Method of Analvsis 340.2 340.2 340.2 340.2 Units

, Fluoride as F- m,/1 260 257 <0.5 <0.5

Volume of Solution 1 0.547 0.561 0.200 0.200 Fluoride as F-



## ~ m; 142.2 144.2 <0.100 <0.100

Comments: All of the above data has been blank corrected.


# ~

~ ' /7Mr. Vernon Moore

Page 2 June 13, 1995 Trigon Project No.: 046-95-104 Trigon Project Name: Kiln Stack June 1995
The data contained in this report were obtained using U.S. EPA approved methodologies. These data have been reviewed and are approved for release. 

# '' L G i' Paul R. Jenkins, Jr. Laboratory Director 

### QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA Analyses were performed using Orion Model 720A lon Selective Meter, Serial Number 001390 and Fluoride potentiometric electrode Mode196-09 BN, Serial Number XZl 01736. Rea;ents used in performing these analyses were logoed in the Trigon Laboratory Analysis book as follows:Fluoride Standard Number 3173-16 Lot Number S229 1,000 ppm as FFluoride TISAB Number 7-34021 Lot Number 10104MM Fluoride Electrode Filling Solution Number 900001 Lot Number ZZl The slope for the fluoride electrode was -58.8 millivolts. The acceptable slope for the fluoride electrode must be in the range of -54 to -60 millivolts. The following matrix interference checks, calibration performance checks and precision checks were performed:
Trigon Sample Number: QC1-710 5104-03B 5104-04B Date Collected: 02/01/95 06/08/95 06/09/95 Description: Laboratory O.IN H : SO, O.IN H : SO,, Control and Rinse and Rinse Code 68970 Spike Duplicate 

### InorQanic Analvsis Date Analyzed 06/12/95 06/13/95 06/13195 EPA Method of Analysis 340.2 340.2 340.2 Units Fluoride as F- mg/1 4.05 392 263 Volume of Solution 1 0.100 0.100 0.516 Fluoride as F- True mg 4.00 388 135.7 Percent Recovery % 101.3% 101.0% 0.0%RPDSample No. 5I04-03B spiked with 2.0 mg/100 ml of Fluoride as FIt should be noted that all samples were analyzedas a l: 10 dilution due to the high concentration of fluoride present.

Ii i

## EPA iYlethod 5- Particulate Determination - Data Analysis

Client Name ~ 

### "•K

~ 

### *, I'

~ 

### •
~ 

### - Ciry/State /~'~ • : , 4: ' Sampling Location Clean-Up Box Number Chain of Custody: Date Received Project Number 

### C= =' -- Sample Date 

### ' Cf;=; Samples Recovered By



### . !Ir Recovery Date 

### ; Received By Locked? 

### ✓ " 

## Equipment Documentation
Run Number Sam le ID Number < 

### 104-0! <" C 4 - Sam le Box Number 1 Z. 3 Probe Number 

### LC= t' , ~ 

### = 

## Analysis of Particulate Recovery
FiIter # til Z« - c i I A?

_ C , ' Final Wei ht. m 5 5 ~ . ' 3

- z ReweiQh. Final Wei ht. MR 35. Z 3 ~ 3• 1 33N •

~ I Initial Wei¢ht, m¢ "{ =6 1 4 +. Rewei¢h. Initial Wei ht. mg 3Z'7. z Avera e Final Wei ht. m 33.3 . 14 'L"7 Averaae Initial Weisht mix 7117 f 311.6 Net Filter Catch ma Beaker # Acetone Rinse Level Marked? Final WeiQht mz 11c1 ~~ J Z 11 0+4 u3 Rewei¢h. Final Wei¢ht. mg f1e1 :13• .d Initial Weiaht. m 1 ~ `+ ,r 1'.0 !+ ? o=+ ~ : .!J ', iJ • ~ Rewei¢h. Initial Wei ht mg ;' L Avera¢e Final Wei¢ht. m AveraQe Initial Wei¢ht. m¢ +' '; S - + L ~ % Acetone Blank + . m I. i") -I•► ~ IVet Front Rinse Catch m Tocal Particulate Collected: ma 

## Gravimetric Documentation

XX 

### w

aal e W t ht 

### w e

Re t h ¢ Final 

### w et t

h w'

e Re t h Date of Gravimetric Analvsis c t u 16/ /•'F ` ~ Time of Gravimetric Analvsis• )YV , 

## ,.__• Relative EIumidirv. Percent ' Y 7 

## Blank Acetone Analysis
Blank Beaker # " Final Wei¢ht m !c.

- 7.

~ ff . '1 Beaker Volume. ml ! oc' Rewei¢h. Final Wei ht mg FC- 1, Acetone Concentration. Percent •G c c I Initial Wei ht. m G~ '' ~ ARalvsr Initials Rewei h Initial Wei ht m ~U~ ' 3

~ '. ~ Reviewer IRitials Acetone Residue, ma 

# 1

"



# 7AV1

# 9 EPA Method 5- Particulate Determination - Da.ta Analysis

Client Name

~ •,_ = Project Number

~ -(f.
~~ rc ~ Ciry/State Sample Date _ [

~ c', le".- Sampling Locadon Samples Recovered By rli,+.; Clean-Up Boz Number Recovery Date C.1-; Chain of Custody: Date Received Received By 0'' ; Locked? ✓ ~ 

### Equipment Documentation
Run Number 14 ~ (; Sam le ID Number q -% , J lGU..nC , Sam le Box Number t ~ 3 Probe Number CLL 

### Analysis of Particulate Recovery Filter fI vi -c ' tiI tl- i -0t, Final Wei ht mg Z:-41.S .#ti Rewei h Final Wei ht mz 34 R. 1 1 54 t. 7 zN -1 2 Initial Wei ht mg t t. l ttt,1 33 I•iJ Reweieh. Initial Wei ht. m ' - t 3

, L Z I. S Averaae Final Wei ht. mg VJ L+ t.(, 34 Avera e Inicial Weight, m "5 3i, I

~ P.L 33t•S Net Filter Catch. ma Beaker # C

- 7 F 

### Acetone Rinse Levei Marked? ✓ ✓ v Final WeiQht m 1c5 Iv, : i ( 5, 6,?L • Z Rewei¢h Fnal Wei ht, m !C''

~ ,;; "-) 11 S, 6 ' r•4 ll Z. c:z: 4 Initial Wei ht mg 115

- 4 -; . I Reweigh Initial Wei ht, m U ~C~ .J.• r t'. t. ( i? ty ~ .~ Average Final Wei ht. ma '.'. r i ' ! 1';, 11 L, Avera¢e Initial Wei ht mg IC 5. 1 1t 5: Acetone Blank + m Net Front Rinse Catch. m Total Particulate Collected m L'— Z -7 

## Gravimetric Documentation

~ i:::<;

~ ri:;:

~ :::::;::::::i:;::•':•'::<::::: : ::::::::i:

~ : Iniaal Wei ht Rewei h Final Weiaht Rewei h Date of Gravimetric Analvsis 'a :. IC J "- c,/

. /I Time of Gravimetric Analvsis c 3 I 11 ~ Relative Humiditv, Percent i I 

### Blank Acetone Analysi,s
Blank Beaker # I" Final Wei ht miz 1, ?IC - Beaker Volume, ml Rewei h Final Wei ht mg 7. _;r ~ ..' Acetone Concentradon Percent <^ Initial Wei ht mg Q, 7. ?!l.••+ Analvst Initials Rewei h Inicial Wei ht mg Z. Z Revfewer Inftials ~ Acetone Residue. m


# en l A l "1 P'_S /,

~ 

# F7i-

' V -:-]

.

# I]l



# I~ 

# IL

~ 

### - - 1

~ 

### 4 

### 1 1 1 ~ ~~ ~



# i11

~ 

# IVo

~ 

# :

_

_ _

.1 rl 

## -j

iy 

### "a

cr cr

C2 

# u

1 

# 4 

# A 4 9 . ~ 9

r.s ,1 / --- ~W

O ~

~

~ cc 

### E ~ 

# zU

~

~ ~

y 

# ~ I

~ 

# Ua`a

V .`.



# _ x J ^

~

l~ y a~ 

# o v ^° UQ ~

~

Qw

J J J v Q O Q

~ J V

•~ ~_~ = ~ O

. r

.. R
v`

~ L~

I ~

"C 

### v H •~

~ Q •A

~ 

### R LL~

O •~ ~ ~. O

~ O V

~ 

## .~

~ .7- 1 

# 1 100, t 4 sl~

~

... R 0 Q
C 

### E

O

~ ~ ~ y .~ Q" G .~
~ 

## a

~ y



### ~ N 

# a

l/ /

### APPENDIX D

PRODUCTION DATA

### - -- - - - ---- -. .. - ------ •- - --..

_ . 

## ~ O~ Lt l.U-'• 

## ~ .eJ . ._. 

## ~~ ./ .~ 5------... . ' 

## ~ . _ ._..J 

## ~ ... /-•_ 

## ~~

.. 

## ~
. ----- ---



### .....__.__ .._ ~ 

### - ------ ~ 

### ---- ~

----..... .



# ... .. -----._. .-------...._. . . ._....----•.-

~ 

# - . . -------- . _._...._ . . -----_.- - ----- -- ..



# ----- ----•----.. . -------- ~ 

# --- ~~ 

# = ---- ~-3 ~ y~ 

# .....C.,.. ~ 

# __._ ~ 

# .r.._ ._._.._.... __.



# ~



# ~ -- --•----. .. -----.-----.. . .__ . _ _ _ . - --. .-----._ _. _... . . . .__ . . .--------_-.--

~ 

## ----- .._--► 

# -- ------- - . _. ._ . ---- ---- ~ -~ ' ~ . ~.~ 

# .. .S._ . ~ ~ 

# - -- h

~-~ 

# -Q..---... .. ._ .._ _._. ~

~ --- -- . ... --------------- . . ------------. - -- . . ._. . _ .--•-- ---- . . . ... _ -----



# ~

/ /- v'

### APPENDIX E

CALIBRATION DATA



# 1"

~ 

# T ql

### QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION PROCEDURES

General. Each item of field or laboratory test equipment purchased or fabricated by Trigon Engineering Consultants is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. New items for which calibration is required are calibrated before initial field use. Equipment whose calibration status may change with use or with time is inspected in the field before testing begins, and again upon return from each field use. When an item of equipment is found to be out of calibration, it is adjusted and recalibrated or retired from. service. A11 equipment is periodically recalibrated in full, regardless of the outcome of these regular inspections. Calibrations are conducted in accordance with United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) specifications. Trigon follows the calibration procedures outiined in EPA Reference Methods found in the Code of Federal Regulations (Volume 40, Part 60) and those recommended in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA/600/R-94/038c). When the Reference Methods do not detail procedures, Trigon uses methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). Data obtained during calibrations are recorded on standardized forms, which are verified for completeness and accuracy by the Quality Assurance Manager. Data reduction and subsequent calculations are performed using Trigon's Air Quality Data System. Calibration calculations are performed by an environmental scientist, independently audited by the Project Manager, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Manager for verification of data. Copies of calibration data are included in each test or project report. Inspection and Maintenance. An effective preventative maintenance program is necessary to ensure equipment performance quality prior to, during, and followi.ng every test Each item of equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is returned to storage. During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned, and recalibrated when necessary. Each item of equipment transported to the field for a test project is inspected again prior to being packed. Trigon performs these quality assurance checks prior to departure for the project site to detect equipment problems which may occur during periods of storage. Trigon transports adequate back-up equipment to each project so as to avoid any unforeseen circumstances. Calibrattion. Source sampling equipment that require calibration include nozzles, pitot tubes, thermometers, flow meters, dry gas meters, and barometers. The following sections detail the calibration procedures followed by Trigon for each item. 

# F

m --- 

# P7A7 r

### Nozzles. Each probe nozzle is uniquely and permanently identified at the time of purchase

or fabrication, and it is calibrated before initial field use and prior to each test The inside diameter of the no7.zle is measured to the nearest 0.001 inch using a digital micrometer. Five measurements are made using different diameters each time. If the difference between the high and the low measurements do not exceed 0.004 inch, the average of the five measurements is used. If the difference exceeds this amount, or when the nozzle becomes nicked, dented, or corroded, the nozzle is reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated. Regardless of usage, all nozzles are inspected and recalibrated on a yearly basis. Pitot Tubes. All Type S pitot tubes are constructed and calibrated in strict accordance with the procedures contained in EPA Reference Method 2. A.Type S pitot tube will have a coefficient of 0.84 ±0.02. A standard pitot tube will have a coefficient of 0.99. Each pitot tube is visually inspected prior to any field use. If the inspection indicates damage, it is recalibrated. Regardless of usage, all pitot tubes are inspected and recahbrated on a yearly basis. Drv Gas Meter and Orifice. Each metering system receives a full calibration at the time of purchase and annually, thereafter. Post-test calibrations are performed after each source test. If the'calibration factor, y(gamma), deviates by less than five percent from the initial value, the test data are acceptable. If y deviates by more than five percent, the meter is recalibrated and the meter coefficient (initial or recalibrated) that yields the lowest sample volume for the test runs is used. Standard practice at Trigon is to recahbrate the dry gas meter anytime y is found to be outside the range of 0.98 < y< 1.02. Barometer. Each field barometer is cahbrated to agree within ± 0.1 inches Hg of a reference mercury barometer. The barometric pressure is corrected for pressure and temperature. Prior to and following each field test the field barometer is verified. Thermometers. Each new thermometer, pyrometer and thermocouple purchased or fabricated by Trigon is calibrated in strict accordance with US EPA Protocol. Cahbration tolerance limits are as follow: Impinger Temperature Gauge ± 1°C or 2°F Dry Gas Meter Temperature Gauge ±3°C or 5.4°F Stack Thermocouples ± 1.5% of absolute temperature All thermometers and thermocouples are inspected and calibrated prior to and following each field test Regardless of usage, all thermometers and thermocouples are inspected and recalibrated on a yearly basis. Laboratory Equipment. Trigon Engineering Consultants has a written quality assurance document that covers cahbration and maintenance of laboratory equipment This includes calibration of each analytical balance against Class S weights. Cahbration of thermometers, barometers, and wet test meters are traceable to MST. A copy of our quality assurance document may be obtained by written request. 

# , -, ,F7A7~

~

~

~ 

### PRETEST - POSTEST CALIBRATION DATA FORM Client 

### - H F - _ .test Date C.'Co

- q'3 

### Calibrator 

### 7f`c Reference Thermometer 

### 100.022 City/State 

### 1rY1 r

~~ 

### Postest Date 

### O Calibrator s'C-c Reference Barometer 

### 600.003
Pretest: Postest: Temperature, °F ReC Tiinp, °F Tem ratu °F ReF: Tem ° F Omeoa R DB HH-25 #100.025 Omeoa R WB HH-25 #100.025 Ome a B DB HF-I-82 #100.014 '1'4

- 14 z Omeea B WB HH-82 #100.014 0 14 Z Ome a G DB HH-82 #100.001 Ome a G WB HH-82 #100.001 Ome a 4 DB HH-25 #100.017 Ome a 4 WB HH-25 #100.017 Dry Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.035 Dry Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.045 Dry Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.067 7

- 1(4 Dry Gas Meter In1et,/Outlet #300.100 Dry Gas Meter InledOutlet #300.200 Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.214 Umbilical Ada tor #1 #300.030 '7

- 14

- 7 z

- ?Z . . nbilical Ada tor #2 #300.031

- 1 N ? 7 17

- 7Z ,mbilical Adalptor #3 #300.032 Z

- tZ Umbilical Ada tor #4 #300.042 Umbilical Ada tor ##5 #300.043 Umbilical Ada tor #6 #300.044 Umbilical Ada tor #7 #300.134 Umbilical Ada tor #8 #300.135 Umbilical Ada tor #9 #300207 Umbilical Ada tor #10 #300 . 1 08 Umbilical. Ada tor #11 #300.216 Umbilical Ada tor ##12 #300.217 Probe #200. 0 2. Z. Probe #200. OZ)

- 71 4 ~ Z Probe #200. O H ~ ~? Probe #200. Probe #200. Probe #200. Pitot #200. Pitot #200. G0 1 Field Baro in.. A Ref.'Barct, in. Ho FieId Baro W. Hg. Ref. Baro in. H Barometer #600.001 Barometer #600.009 rometer ##600.010 Barometer #600.014 S. 77 W. 

### ~ 

### Were all postest calibrations within the speci

~ 

### ied EPA Quality Assurance criteria? dYes o No

,~ i 

# Fp77r

. 

# -I

### ISOKINETIC CONTROL CONSOLE CALIBRATION FORM
` Console Number: 300.067 Calibrator: RBM



# ~ Calibration Date: 04105195 Dry Gas Meter Number: 839875

Expirabion Date: 04/05/96 Barometrtric Pressure, in. Hg: 29.380

Console Gas Yolume Meter Temperatures ' Time Console Orifice Setting Gf-i in. H 2 0 Wet Test

Meter V. ft 3 Dry Gas

Meter V ¢ ft' Wet Test

Meter t„ °F Dry Gas Meter DGM Avg. t d °F 0 Minutes DGM

Factor Y Orifice Meter OH @ in. H Z O iwet tdi 

### •F Outlet tao 

### •F 0.50 5 5.01 67.4 . 69.0 66.0 67.5 12.82 0.997 1.870 1.00 5 5.06 67.4 77.0 68.5 72.8 9.22" 0.996 1.916 1.50 10 10.12 67.1 83.0 72.0 77.5 15.27 1.004 1.951 2.00 10 10.23 66.6 90.0 79.5 84.8 13.40 1.006 1.972 3.00 10 10.25 66.2 92.0 81.5 186.8 10.95 1.006 1.965 4.00 10 10.27 

# 1 66.1 

# 1 93.0 82.5 87.8 

# 1 9.57 1.004 1.997 Average 1.00 1.95



# Y aH ® Tolerances: 1.00 1.84

±0.02 ±0.15



### Y and AH V

are calculated as follows:

V w *P b *(t

d +460) 

### Y = __-__ --------------------- -------------- = 1.00 V d * (P b + AH113.6) * (t,,, + 460)

0.0317*OH(t„+460)*0 OH

~ 

### = w

~~ 

### ____ __ ~ 

### _ .

* ( _ ) Z = 1.95 P b * (t d + 460) V. 

# F7A&V

## C ~ ~ ~G

~ —

H `

U ~

O ^" 

### ,. U

~ ~ 

### , 

# _o r ~

. y

CD 

# w O

Ln

~ 

### o
0

1 ~ ~

~

10 z a
Q y ~ 41 ti 

# Z

~ F „

~ , U „

060 ~ i.. y

. ~

c ~



# _ g

w 1. 4u

. ~ 

## \ y

~
~ L ~ 

# z

~ 

# O

~ ~ ~ C ~

~ ~ — ~ p a L ~

~ ~ a

y 

# s - U

~~ ~

:. 

## U 00

.. Frl V

1~ 1 h.r

~
C '
Q 

# 0

..

~ 

# n r 1

1~

~ O

V 

## U


# z

~ 

### Q

~ 

# . ~ C C 

### +1


### H 6~ 6~ 6. Q 

## u

~ U C R

~ . C
~ O t/1

~

~

~ 

# =- •~ ti

C O

~ .. ~ 6. ~ V
N ~ 0 *a 6. 

### L - ~ 

### , G o -+ L ~ ^

C

~ • — 0

~ ..+

6. ~

~+• U + 

# _ y~ + y 

# ~

v~ Q

~ + y y ...

Vl ~ ++ U Q Q'S .r U •

a7 ~• ~

Co ::
~ , — 3 ~ •- _a

~ ~ .ri
~ ~ yn • !C cc ~ C

~ S~ w s~ ee Q ~ i' ~q ~ ~ V • 6r ~ j

` CO > 0

a. cc y y U 6. > ~ . ee > 

# ~ $ ~ ~
+ +♦

`o

.. . . . Q. . [:;' +♦♦ 

# ,=:

1 O rJ .~ .~.r~~ :::• ~.~ :.:

~ ::::,
~ ..,,: ~

C; . .::::-:•?;::.;.: c ~ ,,~ ,.. N ; ~

^ ~•~ N r!



### c7- ~ 

### r

~ :.. 

# v

0

y V

in

~ . ~

. . . .... , .

~ 

### c•

~ 

### ,. ~

~ rJ `~ ' Lj , .

~

>• c

~ v

. ~ 412., ~ .. ' .x.
........ .. ~ F

<:;'G..

. C ;- w•:,..:. = ;:'7 

### r ~~' r.+ '<'". .. G7:' . > • ... o
~ —~

~ ...


## V,~ _Y

I '?/ LC= ^

~

1 ~

r \ y V

~

L U r ~


### ~ • R GI~ 

# o
~ •y 

## n
~ N •~ O ~i

~ 

## O

~ 

## O

• ~"

C~

Q ~ ~ 

### Z y _

~ 

## 3 "

~ OG ~
r. ~ .+ !C

cc ~

~ ` r

~ 0

a ~

~ a~


## V C

~ 

### o 

## r = v , O

~ ~ p ~ : .~..


### —

~ y


## s U

~ ~ C

u ~ Q %♦ 

# /1 fA V

F~ 

# 1 Ir

~ Q 

## E Q 

# O_ E

~ .~ r

.. ~ 

# IA7j



# d ~ 

## O

~ 

# z O 

## U

F~ 

### Z

~

~ 1~ ~ N C ? Q 1

~ N C~ 3~ V



## u U C R 

### r. O N1 7.1 R U 

### y ~ ~ V ~

ti

~ 

# w

O w C y R

~ op V Ca



# _ ~

H 0

N

Cu 6) "" y ~ + y v1 Q ifp ' C 

# E s E v tj 

## ~ ~~ 

# E

~ s ~ ~ R 3 

### L m ,. . 

### ~

EE~a~~~~ •='R 

# c, tA y 

# R~ o~ o u

~ ;

> ~I v 

### >
.. ~ 

### .°4 ~~

~ 

### : ?• C ~ 

### o 

# E t4s

~ ~ 

# f r

O C ~

CT

~

a— 00

~ - 

### ~

r•~ M, U

J oc

O ~

rJ

~

e

~

J v 1 t~ 00



### ~

s

v 

### $ ~ ~♦♦♦

J ~ ~

. .. ~ .-.... . ~ Q

. .::. :♦♦ .♦ + 6 6 0♦ • , .
~ :: .' ..;.,,..

... ~:~

. ~ .... . .. .

~ . '

~ .. ~ v ~ v , , ~ . O ...; .....:

~~ . .. .::.

~~ ::

~ •'.

~ ;.;;:.::':::

~~ .,. ~ ;a: , ;: .. ~ .

V 1 '"~ ..r♦ .~ r♦ ~ ..♦ ;.c. :;;;:,:';;".: •



### ~ ~ ~. r' ~

:.. .:. :

v r,) czi ~

V
C-,J Q► 

### ~ ~ 

# v p O

p1m



### . ~ ..

L 

# v

r.

r.

. V

~ : r! 

### '.>'V].. :.'-_ ;: a:'•< ; ,; .' e.

~ 

### ' O >:: 

### ~
...

•.~ ~- y

~ .n : ... .

~ ",.... ;. ~.: •:. ~ . 

### , • e;:
~ r. ' s ~

~ 

# .

### 'I'YPE "S" PITOT TUBE CAI,IBRATION FORM Date: 01103195 

## Calibrator. BLS Specifications: A.) Pftot tube assembIy must be level. B.) If pitot tttbe is damaged eaplain uader cottiments section. C.) Z= A Sin YL<0.125) and w= A Sin eL<0.03125) D.) o: <10° and (3 <5° LD. Length al° ar2° O1° 02° Y° , e• A, in. Z, in. W, in. P.4, in. PB, fn. Dt, in. Indivfdual Pitot Tubea ; 200.019 2' 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 0.935 0.024 0.01632 0.467 0.468 0.371

200.049 3' 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.940 0.000 0.00820 0.470 0.470 0.371 200.002 4' 0.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.942 0.025 0.00822 0.471 0.471 0.372 

## ~ 200.02S 4' 1.5 7.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.981 0.017 0.00000 0.491 0.490 0.375

200.025'0 5' 1.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.960 0.000 0.01675 0.480 0.480 0.376 200.003 6' 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.949 0.008 0.01656 0.474 0.475 0.374 

## ~ 200.044 6' 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.955 0.008 0.02500 0.477 0.478 0.375

200.038 T 0.5 3.5 0.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.948 0.025 0.00000 0.474 0.474 0.372 200.030 S' 0.5 4.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.965 0.017 0.02526

. 0.483 0.482 0.372 

## ~ 200.03110' 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.926 0.024 0.02424 0.463 0.463 0.373

300.164 Arid. 3.5 3.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.132 0.030 0.01976 0.566 0.566 0.377

~ Pitot Tubes Attacited to Probes ` 200.020 2' 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.046 0.009 0.00000 0.523 0.523 0.374

200.021 2' 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 1.066 0.028 0.00930 0.533 0.533 0.376 ( 200.036 2' 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.958 0.025 0.00836 0.479 0.479 0.367 

## ~ 200.037 2' 0.0 2.5 2.0 4.5 1.5 1.0 0.986 0.026 0.01721 0.493 0.493 0.368

200.004 3' 1.5 0.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.0 0.939 0.016 0.00000 0.470 0.469 0.378 200.005 

# 1
200.006 3' 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.944 0.008 0.00000 0.472 0.472 0.378 3' 1.5 0.5 3.5 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.933 0.041 0.00000 0.467 0.466 0.373 200.015 3' 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.936 0.016 0.00817 0.468 0.468 0.375 200.016 3' 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.940 0.000 0.00820 0.470 0.470 0.374 

## ~ 200.017 3' 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.938 0.025 0.00000 0.469 0.469 0.373

200.007 5' 1.0 0.0 ZS 2S 1.5 0.0 0.946 0.025 0.00000 0.473 0.473 0.376 200.008 5' OS 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.950 0.025 0.00000 0.475 0.475 0.375 j 200.009 5' 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 L5 0.0 0.940 0.025 0.00000 0.470 0.470 0.376

200.022 S' 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.933 0.024 0.00814 0.466 0.467 0.376 200.027.5' 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.939 0.000 0.01640 0.469 0.470 0.376 

## ~ 200.034 5' 20 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.940 0.033 0.00820 0.470 0.470 0.374

200.024 0 6 0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.5 0.628 0.016 0.00548 0.314 0.314 0.251 200.010 T 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.938 0.025 0.00819 0.469 0.469 0.376 

## ~ 200.011 7' 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.938 0.008 0.00819 0.469 0.469 0.378

200.012 T 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.940 0.000 0.00000 0.470 0.470 0.376 200.039 T 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.936 0.000 0.01634 0.468 0.468 0.374 

# I
200.040 T 1.0 0.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.944 0.016 0.02471 0.472 0.472 0.374

200.041 8' 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.926 0.016 0.01616 0.463 0.463 0.370 200.045 8' 0.0 0.0 0.5 LO 1.5 0.0 0.937 0.025 0.00000 0.468 0.469 0.376


## ~ 200.01310' 0.0 0.0 20 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.927 0.008 0.00000 0.463 0.464 0.371

200.01410' 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.946 0.008 0.00000 0.473 0.473 0.373 Cotnments: Pitot Tubes Required Only itiCnor Maintenance • Water Cooled " Inconel Pitot tubes requiring calibration: None 300.164 3 Anderson Pitot Tube Euension 

## ~

-PYREX NOZZLE CALIBRATION DATA 5/8" SHANK Date CaLbrated: 01/03/95 Cahbrated By: JCC

Nozzie Diameter (a)
Nozzle Davg(c) D1 D2 D3 D4 DS Diff. Number (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (b)
5/8" Nozzle 300.101 0.623 0.623 0.624 0.624 0.622 0.623 0.002 300.102 0.622 0.622 0.623 0.622 0.622 0.623 0.001 300.186 0.621 0.621 0.622 0.622 0.621 0.621 0.001 1/2" Nozzies 300.103 0.494 0.494 0.495 0.494 0.494 0.494 0.001 300.104 0.495 0.495 0.494 0.495 0.496 0.495 0.002
7/16" Nozzles 300.078 0.430 0.432 0.432 0.429 0.428 0.428 0.004 300.095 0.436 0.436 0.437 0.436 0.436 0.437 0.001 300.096 0.433 0.432 0.433 0.433 0.432 0.433 0.001 318" Nozzles 300.077 0.377 0.378 0.377 0.377 0.377 0.378 0.001 300.093 0.379 0.379 0.379 0.380 0.379 0.378 0.002 300.094 0380 0.381 0.381 0.379 0.379 0380 0.002 5/16" Noales 300.088 0.311 0.311 0.312 0.311 0.311 0.312 0.001 300.089 0.314 0.314 0315 0.314 0.315 0.314 0.001 300.090 0.315 0.316 0.315 0.315 0.314 0.315 0.002 300.092 0.310 0309 0.309 0.312 0.310 0.310 0.003 1/4" Nozzles 300.075 0.2S4 0.254 0.255 0.254 0254 0.254 0.001 300.121 0.257 0.257 0.258 0.258 0.257 

### 0.257 0.001 300.122 0.257 0.256 0.257 0.257 0.258 0257 0.002 300.091 0.251 0.250 0.251 0.251 0.252 0.251 0.002 3/16" Nozzies 300.183 0.190 0.189 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.001 300.184 0.191 0.192 0.190 0.192 0.191 0.191 0.002 300.185 0.191 0.191 0.192 0.191 0.192 0.190 0.002
1" Nozzies 300.218 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.997 0.999 0.996 0.003 300.219 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.001

wnar (a) 01.2.3.a.3
- Ilw diNwnt n=a irai0a dartHtvs. mraura0 to nr~ 0.001 n (b) 0 . maornrm difhrnnoa batwaan arty two Clamaars. (in.) 0< 0.004 in. (o) Oavp
- avarapa d 01. DZ. 00. 04. and 05

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM

NIST REFERENCE THERMOMETER TRANSFER CALIBRATION Tolerance: +/- 1S% of Absolute Temperature
Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.290 Ambient Temperature. Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.023 Calibrated By: JCC Ref. Thermometer Serial No.: 2890
NIST Reference Transfer Temperature Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Instrument Difference ID No. Pofnt Source Temperature Temperature Calculatlon Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % -30 to 120 Deg. F Thermometer Serial Number 97133 100.022 1 Water Bath 43 43 0.00

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 3 Water Bath 114 113 0.17 -5 to 400 Deg. C Thermometer Serial Number U38717 100.024 1 Water Bath 43 6 Deg. C 0.04

2 Water Bath 69 21 Deg. C -0.15 3 Water Bath 114 46 Deg. C -0.14 -320 to 2S00 Deg. F Omega HH82 Pyrometer Serial Number 70JY00149 100.001 1 Water Bath 43 42 0.20

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 •320 to 2500 Deg. F Omega HH82 Pyrometer Serial Number 72JY0306 100.010 1 Water Bath 43 43 0.00

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 -120 to 2000 Deg. F Omega HH25 Pyrometer Serial Number T-98180 100.017 1 Water Bath 43 43 0.00

2 Water Bath 69 69 0.00 3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 -120 to 2000 Deg. F Omega HH25 Pyrometer Serial Number T-124997 100.025 1 Water Bath 43 42 0.20

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 25 to 1125 Deg. C Thermolyne 1400 Pyrometer Serlal Number 746940350496 600.015 1 Muffle Furnace 80 Deg. F 27 Deg. C -0.11

2 Muffle Furnace 96 Deg. F 35 Deg. C 0.18 3 Muffle Furnace 118 Deg. F 48 Deg. C -0.07 4 Muffle Furnace 106 Deg. C' 105 Deg. C 0.26 S Muffle Fttrnace 210 Deg. C' 211 Deg. C -0.21 6 Muffle Furnace 348 Deg. C• 350 Deg. C -0.32 •Used 100.024 Thermometer Serial Number U38717 as Reference Thermometer

Source = Type of calibration system used. Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460)

.. --__----- X 100 = <1S%

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 I


# ~ I

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM THERMOCOUPLES Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature
Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure. In. Hg: 29.290 Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.022 Calibrated By: JCC Reference Thermometer No.: 100.024
Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

# i Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer D(fference

1D IYo. Polnt Source Temperature Temperature Calculation Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % 

## ~ Omega HH-25 Dry Bulb - Red Teant i 100.025 1 Water Bath 53 53 0.00 2 Water Bath 156 156 0.00 3 Oil Bath 270 270 0.00 

## ~ Omega HH-25 Wet Bulb - Red Team

100.025 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19

2 Water Bath 146 146 0.00 

## ~ 3 Oil Bath 208 208 0.00

Omega HH-82 Dry Bulb - Blue Team 100.014 1 Water Bath 53 53 0.00 

## ~ 2 Water Bath 156 155 0.16 3 Oil Bath 270 270 0.00 Omega HH-82 Wet Bulb - Blue Team 

## ~ 100.014 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19 

## ~ 2 Water Bath 146 145 0.17 3 Oil Bath 208 208 0.00 Omega HH-82 Dry Bulb - Green Team 100.001 1 Water Bath 

## ~ 53 53 0.00 2 Water Bath 156 156 0.00 3 Oil Bath 270 271 -0.14 ` Omega HH-82 Wet Bulb - Green Team 1 100.001 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19 2 Water Bath 146 146 0.00 3 Oil Bath 208 207 0.15 

## ~ Omega HH-25 Dry Bulb

100.017 1 Water Bath 53 53 0.00

2 Water Bath 156 155 0.16 

## ~ 3 Oil Bath 270 270 0.00

Omega HH-25 Wet Bulb r 100.017 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19 I 2 Water Bath 146 146 0.00 3 Oil Bath 208 208 0.00



## ~ Source = Type of calibration system used.

Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) X 100 = <1S%

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM TIMRMOCOUPLES Tolerance: +/- 1S% of Absolute Temperature
Date: 01/03195 Ambient Temperature. Deg. F: 68 Calibrated By: JCC Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: Reference Thermometer No.: Reference Thermometer No.: 29.290 100.022 100.017
Reference Bimetalltc Temperature Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Thermometer Difference ID No. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % Blmetalltc Wet Bulb 100.005 1 Water Bath 33 33 0.00

2 Water Bath 66 65 0.19 3 Oil Bath 193 194 -0.15 BlmetallIc Wet Bulb 100.006 1 Water Bath 33 34 -0.20

2 Water Bath 66 66 0.00 3 Oil Bath 193 196 -0.46 Bimetallic Wet Bulb 100.019 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20

2 Water Bath 66 66 0.00 3 Oil Bath 194 194 0.00 Bimetalllc Wet Bulb 100.020 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20

2 Water Bath 66 65 0.19 3 Oil Bath 194 194 0.00 Bimetalllc Wet Bulb 100.021 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20

2 Water Bath 66 68 -0.38 3 Oil Bath 194 195 -0.15

Source = Type of calibration system used. Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460)

_ X 100 = <1S°lo

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 

# I ,~F 

# 7 A 

# ' V~

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM ' THERMOCOUPLES Toleraace: +/- 1.595 of Abaolute Temperature


# ~ Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Presaure, Ia. Hg:

Ambieat Temperature. Deg. F: 68 Refereace Thermometer No.: Calibrated By: JCC Refereace Thermometer No.: 

# 1 29,290 100.022 100.017 RefaYace Thermoeouple Temperature Thermocouple Refereace Tltermometer Potentiometer Difiereace m No. Poiat Source Temperature Temperature Calculatton 

# ~ Degrees F Degrees F Perceat, 96

2' P(tot Tube 200.019 1 Water Bath 68 70 -0.38 

# I 2 Water Bath 161 161 0.00 3 Oil Batb 316 317 -0.13 3' Pitot Tube 200.049 1 Water Bath 74 74 0.00 

# f
2 Water Bath 154 155 -0.16 3 Oil Batb 338 334 0.90 4' Pitot Tube 

# ~ 200.002 1 Water Batb 62 63 -0.19 2 Water Bath 159 159 0.00 3 Oil Bath 304 306 -0.26 4' Pltot Tube 200.028 

# ~ 1 Water Bsth 62 63 -0.19 2 Water Bath 154 154 0.00 3 Oil Batb 311 312 -0.13 3' P(tot Tube 

# ~ 200.025 1 Water Bath 62 64 -0.38 2 Water Bath 161 160 0.16 3 Oil Bath 321 322 -0.13 6' Pitot Tube 

# ~
200.003 1 Water Bath 69 70 -0.19 2 Water Bath 152 153 -0.16 

# ~ 6' Pitot Tnbe 3 Oil Bath 316 321 -0.64

200.044 1 Water Bath 62 63 -0.19

2 Water Bath 159 158 0.16 

# ~ 3 Oil Bath 310 306 0S2

T Pitot Tube 200.038 1 Water Bath 62 64 -0.38 

# ~ 2 Water Bath 159 159 0.00 3 Oil Bath 317 315 0.26 8' Pitot Tube 200.030 1 Water Batb 62 63 -0.19 

# ~ 2 Water Bath 160 160 0.00 3 Oil Batb 316 321 -0.64 10' Pitot Tube 200.031 

# ~ 1 Water Bath 62 63 -0.19 2 Water Bath 161 161 0.00 3 Oil B at 6 341 344 -0.37 

# 1 Source - Type of calibratioa rystem uaed.

Tempenture Differeace Calculation: 

# ~ (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) X 100 - <1596 Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460

t I

-i J 

## f TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM THERMOCOLTPLES ( Tolerance: +/- 1.5 0 10 of Absolute Temperature f Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.290

Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.022 ( Calibrated By: JCC Reference Thermometer No.: 100.017
Reference Thermocouple Temperature Thermocouple Reference ( Thermometer Potentlometer Difference

ID No. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation Degrees F Degrees F Percent, °o 5' Probe (1) 200.007 1 Water Bath 69 70 -0.19

2 Water Bath 147 148 -0.16 3 Oil Bath 327 333 -0.76 5' Probe (2) 200.008 1 Water Bath 68 69 -0.19

2 Water Bath 150 151 -0.16 3 Oil Bath 324 328 -0S1 5' Probe (3) 200.009 1 Water Bath 69 70 -0.19

2 Water Bath 145 146 -0.17 3 Oil Bath 318 322 -0.51 5' Probe (4) 200.022 1 Water Bath 69 71 -0.38

2 Water Bath 153 151 0.33 3 Oil Bath 338 335 0.38 5' Probe (5) 200.027 1 Water Bath 69 71 •0.38

2 Water Bath 152 150 0.33 3 Oil Bath 345 336 1.12 5' Probe (6) 200.034 1 Water Bath 69 71 -0.38

2 Water Bath 152 150 0.33 3 Oil Bath 331 329 0.25 6' Probe (•) 200.024 1 Water Bath 68 70 -0.38

2 Water Bath 153 151 0.33 3 Oil Bath 381 379 0.24 4 Muffle Furnace 500 • 500 0.00 5 Muffle Furnace 750 • 750 0.00 6 Muffle Furnace 1100 • 1100 0.00 •Used 600.015 Pyrometer and Thermocouple Serial Number 746940350496 as Reference Thermometer

Source = Type of calibration system used. •= Water Cooled Probe Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460)

..__ X 100 = < 1.5%

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460
E• 1.1 

### ~ ~ 

# , FA

r 

# l

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM THERMOCOUPLES Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature
Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.290 Ambient Temperature. Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.022 ` Calibrated By: JCC Reference Thermometer No.: 100.017
Reference Thermocouple Temperature Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer Difference i ID No. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation Degree9 F Degrees F Percent, % 300.035 ; DGM Ialet 1 Water Bath 35 34 0.20 2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00 300.035

~ DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 35 35 0.00 2 Water Bath 68 68 0.00 

# 1 3 Water Bath 139 140 -0.17

300.045 DGM Inlet 1 Water Bath 35 34 0.20

2 Water Bath 67 68 -0.19

~ 3 Water Bath 140 140 0.00

300.045 DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 34 34 0.00

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19

~ 3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00

300.067 DGM Inlet 1 Water Bath 35 33 0.40

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00

~ 300.067

~ DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 35 33 0.40 2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00 300.100 DGM Inlet 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 3 Water Bath 137 138 -0.17

~ 300.100

DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 3 Water Bath 137 138 -0.17

Source = Type of calibration system uaed. Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) X 100 = <1S%

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 I

## TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM THERMOCOUPLES Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature
Date: 01/03/95 Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 68 Calibrated By: JCC Barometric Pressure. In. Hg: Reference Thertnometer P1o.: 29.290 100.022

Reference Thermocouple Temperature Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentlometer Dlfference ID iYo. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % Umbilicral Adaptor #1 300.030 1 Water Bath 32 34 -0.41

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 Umbilical Adaptor #2 300.031 1 Water Bath 32 33 -0.20

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 Umbilical Adaptor #3 300.032 1 Water Bath 32 32 0.00

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 Umbiilcal Adaptor #4 300.042 1 Water Bath 32 32 0.00

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 Umbilical Adaptor #5 300.043 1 Water Bath 32 33 -0.20

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 Umbiiical Adaptor #6 300.044 1 Water Bath 32 32 0.00

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 3 Water Bath 86 87 -0.18

Source = Type of calibration system used. Temperature Difference Calculation: (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) X 100 = <1S%

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460

~ 

# u 

# F71

1 C,

### EVER READY THERMOMETER CO., INC. 228 LACKAWANNA AVENUE WEST PATERSON, NJ 07424 (201) 812-7474 PAGE 1 OF

R E P 0 R T 0 F CALIBRATION LIQUID

- IN

- GLASS-THERMOMETER CALIBRATED BY EVER READY THERMOMETER C0.
MARKED: ERTCO CAT 1002-3FC S/N-2890 RANGE: +30 TO +124 DEGREES F IN 0.2 DEGREE GRADUATIONS.

THERMOMETER CORRECTION READING (ITS-90)** 31.94 F 40.00 60.00 100.00 120.00 0.06 F

0.00 0.00 0.06 0.00 ** ALL TEMPERATURES IN THIS REPORT ARE BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL TEMPERATURE SCALE OF 1990 (ITS-90) PUBLISHED IN THE METROLGIA 27, N0. 1, 3/10/90. t'HIS THERMOMETER WAS CALIBRATED AGAINST A STANDARD CALIBRATED AT THE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY (NIST) FORMERLY THE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDAR.DS (NBS) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM METHOD E 77, AND NBS MONOGRAPH 174. FOR A DISCUSION OF ACCURACIES ATTAINABLE WITH SUCH THERMOMETERS SEE

, 

### NBS MONOGRAPH 250-23. IF NO SIGN IS GIVEN ON THE CORRECTION, THE TRUE TEMPERATURE IS HIGHER THAN THE INDICATED TEMPERATURE; IF THE SIGN GIVEN IS NEGATIVE, THE TRUETEMPERATURE IS LOWER THAN THE INDICATED TEMPERATURE. TO USE THE CORRECTIONS PROPERLY, REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO THE NOTES GIVEN BELOW. THE THERMOMETER WAS TESTED IN A 

### LARGE, CLOSED-TOP, ELECTRICALLY HEATED, LIQUID BATH, BEING

- IMiERSED" 76MM. THE TEMPERATURE OF THE ROOM WAS ABOUT 25 DEGREES C(77 DEGREES F). IF THE THERMOMETER IS USED UNDER CONDITIONS WHICH WOULD CAUSE THE AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OF THE EMERGENT LIQUID COLUIN TO DIFFER MARICEDLY FROM THAT PREVAILING IN THE TEST, APPRECIABLE DIFFERENCES IN THE INDICATIONS OF THE THERMOMETER WOULD RESULT .

CONTINUED TEST NUMBER: 145875 iATE: 03/29/94 STANDARD SERIAL N0. 128239 NIST IDENTIFICATION N0. 88024 

### ,- i

### EVER READY THERMOPMETER CO., INC. PAGE 2 OF 2
R E P 0 R T 0 F CALIBRATION LIQUID-IN-GLASS-THERMOMETER

THE TABULATED CORRECTIONS APPLY PROVIDED THE ICE-POINT READING, TAREN AFTER EXPOSURE FOR NOT LESS THAN 3 DAYS TO A TEMPERATURE OF ABOUT 20 DEGREES C(70 DEGREES F) IS 31.94 DEGREES F. IF THE ICE-POINT READING IS FOUND TO BE HIGHER (OR LOWER) THAN STATED, ALL OTHER READINGS WILL BE HIGHER (OR LOWER) TO THE SAME EXTENT. IF THE THERMOMETER IS USED AT A GIVEN TEMPERATURE SHORTLY AFTER BEING HEATED TO A HIGHER TEMPERATURE. AN ERROR OF 0.01 DEGREES OR LESS, FOR EACH 10 DEGREE DIF'FERENCE BETWEEN THE TWO TEMPER.ATURES, MAY BE INTRODUCED. THE TABULATED CORRECTIONS APPLY IF THE THERMOMETER IS USED IN THE UPRIGHT POSITION; IF USED IN A HORIZONTAL POSITION, THE INDICATIONS MAY BE A FEW HUNDREDTHS OF A DEGREE HIGHER.

TEST NUMBER: 145875 DATE: 03/29/94 STANDARD SERIAL NO. 128239 NIST IDENTIFICATION N0. 88024 

# _ •

~ 

# ~ 

# __ ~ 

# ---

- ------------ 

# ~ Charles Tang-Niaa QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER 

# KPZ

### Instruments

453 

# NATIONAL WEATHER SERUICE TYPE

IVIERCURIAL BAROMETERS Usable up to 900 metres (3,000 feet) i re National Weather Servica ype barcrr,eter is PRINCO's highest grad e merc urial baronecer. It is .:sed by weather services and airports the wcrfd over. T'ne glass tube has a uniforn inside 

### dfameter of 7 mm for constant cacillary depression throughout the length of the scale. Scales are set at the factory by comparison with a baroneter certified by the National Bureau of Standards, and read tne locai pressure without the necessity of correctirtg for . 

### capillary depression. The vernier can be s.moothly and precisely set by means of a rack and ainion d, ive. controiled by a knurled 

### adjusting knob. White plastic bac:<grounds ori the mounting panel facilitate observation of the Forin type cistern and mercury coiumrt. i ne venier has a sightir5 -adge, frcnt and rear, to avoid paraltax. A suspension bracicet and an aCiustable rrng c!amp for the cfstem hold ttze barcneter firmly in the vertfcal position ort the mounting 

### panel. A dual scale CelsiuslFartranrteit therncmeter with a— 25 to 50°C/—t0 to t20°F range indicates the proper temperature to be 

### used for tencerature correctiors. An instruction booklet with information for undersiandinS anc procer use of the barometer is supolied with each instrument. Comclete correc:ion tables for 

### temperature and gravity are includeG. T'nis barometer is accurate to =0.3 mb, 0.2 mm, or 0.01 inch of 

### mercury wihen carefulhy set ard read. and after temperature and gravity correctfors ;ia%,e been acalied. For greatest accuracy a Certiffcate of Calibraaon may be obtained and the correctiort contained therein also applied. Each National Weather Service barometer rtas a serial number. 

### 1'ne rugged construction of the National Weather Service type barometer is sucM that it can be sl`irpped safely by United Parcet Service or express. The kidskin bag, in the Fortin type reservoir, 

### dampens mercury coiumn oscitiations durfng shipment. The lower part of the glass tube is narrowed down to minimize mercury weight, and is protected by foam cushions, thus offering added 

### resistance to damage during shipment. The cisterrt may be .apened in ttie field for cleaning of the cistern glass and cistem mercury. Ttte 

### barometer contains approximate!y o80 grams (1.5 pounds) of inercury total. It is shipped completely assembled, fiiled with mercury and ready to use. Mounting panel dimensions are 19 x 76 x 1072 mm 

### (3!4 x 3 x 42 inches). The shippirg weight is 5 kg (i i pourtds) and box dfinensions are 235 x 250 x 1197 mm (9 x 10 x 47 inches). 

### Catalog Number scales 453 inch and millimetre 45381 inch and millibar 453MB millibar and millimetre 

# I,P __

~

# • SARTORIUS CORPORATION • TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION 

# s

~ 

# r U 

# r ' u S 

# BALANCE CERTIEI CATE o fCALIBRATI O N

CUSTOMER
~ 

## L ~ 

## G 406Z 

# s2a 0 2 7 4 2

/~.~I Q~S Ti~/~ / T~' ~d NEXT CAL.IBRATIO N DATE:



### ~ 

### ffJ9l1L.OTTF /(I ~ .~.~DL~ DATE OF ISSUE: 

## g ' / - g ~ DEPT:: ENVIRONMENTAL CONDTITONS: '' O° `

~ IAKE: / MODEL: 1 0 9 07 

## 9ws SERYAL J 

## 942400

, 

## 52 

# 17iis certi

~ 

# " ies that the test weight,s used are traceable to the National Irrstitute of Standards & Technology Sartorius Weight set ID#: Calibrated to Class: ~ 

# Date weight set cahibrated: eo' 7 ' gz/ Date weight set due: 

# ;,' ?' 9 N.I.S.T. Test number: 

# 731Z .2 4 f 36 6 9 CORNER LOAD ERROR 

## A B

( j) 

## D C

FRONT - * Not applicaWe to circular paas 

### T T1

~ 7FAl2T?'V t'

~ TFt''TZ• 

## Nominal Value Before Adjustment After Adjustment

~ 

### oD. oo /9
~ 

### Ot

~ 

### •oo00 106.0000 I ~ 

### Oo • 0000 

## .5 • oa O • 0000 So .ocoo O, /O.oaoO

. 1 1



## Sartorius Service 

# 3- / - 9 ~ Date 133 Fiaaedaod Bl"d. Fdgeweod, Ne+v York 11717 Toll Feem (800) 846-3108 ~ Ptsonr. (516) 2344249 Fsac (518) 234.4252 RE;:. 52n9nd0d c I n ~ 

### :PO

~ 

### rs s,I.A~vs A B C D*

BEFORE ADJ. , ~oy

A~'TER A.DJ. o a o

# We 

# i g 

# ht-Cal'

~ 

# ertiTicate -

~ ~ , .

~ 

# d

- Lion ' TROEMNER iNC. . I L T AAANUFACftJRERS OF PAECISION WEIGMTS . . . pr M/ SS STANQARDS • BALANCES • I.A80RATDRY APPAFUTUS

W! MmlMwr MIMUt NRAOeJ"A. Pit ri142 rnar 21errt44M . a= rsrrtww Sartorius Corp. 131 Heartland Blvd. Edgewood, NY 11717 Test Completed: 02/21/94 Order Number: XFER-017776 Control Number: 37494 Weight Set S/N: 732-A2

~ Description of Weights: 100q - lmq Weight Set 

# I Material Density (g/cm3 at 20 C) Range 

# l Tested with Reference Standards Traceable to the National Institute of Standards & Technology under NIST Test No. 731/243669 ' We certify that the weights listed are calibrated to Class 1 The calibration of these weights is based on apparent mass vs. material of density 8.0q/cm3. 

# I * DENOTES WEIGHT IS MARKED WITH A DOT CORRECTION CORRECTION ''?GHT SIZE BEFORE AFTER UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE CALIHRATION CALIBRATION ( + or - ) ( + or - )
100 g +0.109 mq +0.109 mg 0.0700 mq 0.250 mg 50 g -0.184 mq +0.089 mg 0.0300 mg 0.120 mq 20 q +0.000 mg +0.000 mq 0.0200 mq 0.074 mq 20 g+r -0.002 mq -0.002 mg 0.0200 mg 0.074 mg 10 q -0.007 mq -0.007 mg 0.0190 mq 0.050 mg 5 g +0.0290 mg +0.0290 mq 0.0130 mq 0.034 mg 2 q +0.0076 mq +0.0076 mq 0.0066 mg 0.034 mg 2 g + +0.0191 mq +0.0191 mq 0.0066 mg 0.034 mg 1 g +0.0041 mq +0.0041 mg 0.0038 mq 0.034 mg 500 mq (New) -0.0370 mq +0.0065 mq 0.0032 mg 0.010 mg 200 mq (New) -0.0270 mq +0.0049 mg 0.0015 mq 0.010 mg 200 =; •(New) -0.0265 mq +0.0074 mq 0.0015 mq 0.010 mq 100 mq -0.0075 mq -0.0075 mg 0.0021 mg 0.010 mq 50 mq +0.0046 mq +0.0046 mg 0.0021 mg 0.010 mq 20 mq -0.0070 mq -0.0070 mg 0.0022 mq 0.010 mq 20 mq * +0.0000 mq +0.0000 mg 0.0022 mq 0.010 mq 10 mq (New) -0.0120 mq +0.0000 mq 0.0013 mq 0.010 mq 5 mq +0.0045 mq +0.0045 mq 0.0029 mq 0.010 mq 2 mq -0.0020 mq -0.0020 mq 0.0010 mg 0.010 mq 2 mq * -0.0050 mq -0.0050 mq 0.0010 mq 0.010 mq 1 mq -0.0004 mq -0.0004 mq 0.0025 mq 0.010 mg

Temperature 23 C Pressure 761,0 mm Hq Relative Humidity 40 % The above calibration satisfies all requirements outlined in

1, and applicable documents.•

TROElYINER ,Na sr Fralf7c Ward, Metroloqy Manaqer



### By i %

~

.

... ✓ C ~`~ 11.f" /

~~ C` ~

~ usan Coakley, weiq Calibrator 

### lk i

### CALIBRATION AND TEST WET TEST METER
DATE: 09-08-94
METER TYPE: AL-20 METER SERIAL NUM. : 11088
TEST ON FIVE FOOT BELL PROVER # 3785 i OIL TEMP. 74 DEG.
AIR TEMP. 73.5 DEG.

TEST FLOW RATE PERCENT OF PROOF



## ~ 118 CFH 100.0 % 60 CFH 100.0 % 24 CFH 099.9 % 

# I

TEST BY: HOW RD YFIE D 

# I

I

~



### / q l)d 

## `7

4 a4.


# TO

o t

..• '`• ^ =. ` ` ` 4 ~ ` . ~ , w l '` \ • t~_~ 1

U.5
f t



# -zz _ ~ 

# - _ --Z ~, ~~~

4-4

1 4



## _ ~ _ ~ 

# _` _ . J

~ O ~~

r 

### ~ 

# _ ` _ ? — — _ ® i , : ,
00,



# EM Z -,-

# Make 934-AH your choice too -- 

# request a sample now!
If you're not already using the accepted standard for water quality testing, here's an opportunity to evaivate + samptes of Whatman 934-AH.Whatman grade 934-AH is a smooth-surfaced, high retention glass microfibre filter intended for routine filtra- 

# ~ tions and water quality testing. These fiiters are produced entirely from the highest grade of borosilicate giassmicrofibres. are binder free and will withstand temperatures over 500°C. 

# ~ Whatman giass microfibre filters offer a special combination ot advantages, providing high filtration speed with f+etention of exiremely fine particulates.

~ j if you're not using Whatman 934-AH, here's an op

### Nortunity to start. Just write on your letterhead, specifying ( the diameter you require and mail to: 

# WHATMAN 934-AH GLASS MlCROFIBRE FILTERS

THE. FIL TER OF CHOICE FOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS ANALYSlS

Whatman Inc. 9 Bridewell Place Clifton, New Jersey 07014

Fortechnical inquireson 

## Whatman Grade 934-AH CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 922-0361 in New Jersey call (201) 773-5800 

# WHATMAN 934-AH Availability: Circles --100 per Box CATALOG DIAMETER NUMBER (CM) PRICE/BOX 1827-021 2.1 5 6.60 1827-024 2.4 7.30 1827-032 3.2 8.70 1827-037 3.7 9.45 1827-042 4.25 10.50 1827-055 5.5 13.85 1827-070 7.0 17.30 1827-090 9.0 22.85 1827-110 11.0 32.25 1827-125 12.5 39.60 1827-150 15.0 51.85


# TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS Weight (gsm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 Thickness (mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.33 Retention (μm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 tFitration Speed (sec/100 mi) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 DOP Penetration (0.3μm Particfe) . . . . . . . 0.02% Minimum Dry Tensil (g/1.5cm width) . . . . . . . . 300 Minimum Wet Burst (psi) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.20 Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Smooth -MVzouq t.at a t0 ae "rosutlenNe.

~.~...~~ 

# WMrha,ftna rC

Whatman Inc. ,9,Bridewell Place, CJifton, New Jersey 07014 Telephone 201-773-5800 Telex 133426 i ~~.~~ • f~ `, ~ '' . ~ , .~ ~~.. `\ :;

~

;.•
~ ..

~ - , - x•,.. , J ` ~ ~ •,~ .

i y a v

, ~ , J,'

. .

. . ~ •~~~i~~~. Jama A. Griham;. 

# X ar 

# t h 

# (Ila trIIlixia N. David Smic h Commissiona •,\.,\\

~ ~~~~~~ gepal`tltTe2'Lf o'f

~ l$rirliltlixE Direcror

V ,'

~ ' .•

~ ~ lZtt ~ 3t ~ 8 ~ L11tStII2'i 

# CERTIFICATE OF TRACEABILITY AND 

# REPORT OF CALIBRATION

] The standard(s) described on the following page have been compared

to standards of the State of North Carolina and have been found to 

# ~ have values as listed. Traceability to the National Institute of

Standards and Technology, NIST (formerly The National Bureau of Standards, NBS) is via the NIST test number listed on the report.
Adjustments of precision laboratory standards are not recommended. Therefore, no adjustments have been made to these standards and certification to any tolerance classif cation is neither stated nor implied. The user(s) of these standards should examine the deviation from nominal value and the associated uncertainty to ascertain if these standards meet their precision requirements.



# ~ The uncertainty is an expression of the overall uncertainty using three

standard deviations as the limit of random errors of ineasurement plus the uncertainty of the State Standard used in comparison.

, The primary testing methodology used is the Double Substitution

Method, NIST Handbook 145, 

## Handbook for the Quality Assurance 

# I of Metrological Measurements, SOP number 4. Three . double

substitution weighings are averaged to arrive at the listed value.

~ --I

# NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
JAMES A. GRAHAM COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE 

# STANDARDS DIVISION P.O. BOX 27647, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611

(919)733-4411 

### N. DAVID SMITH, DIRECTOR 

# ( STATEMENT OF TRACEABILITY I SUBMITTED BY: Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. DATE OF TEST: September 7, 1994

1920 Starita Road, Suite J TEST NUIVIBER: NC0894W072 Charlotte, NC 28206 TOLERANCE: ASTM Class 4 

# ~ PO NUMBER: Verbal J A Blanton



# ~ DESCRIP'ITON:
1 - 50 

# ~ 1 - 30 1 - 20 1- 10 

## 5 1- 3 1- 2
1 - 500 1 - 200 

### One (1) Set of Ohaus (brand) Weights, Serial Number 6640

g weight 1- 200 mg. weight g weight 1- 100 mg weight g weight 1- 50 mg weight g weight 1- 20 mg weight g weight 1- 20 mg. weight g weight 1- 10 mg weight g weight 1- 5 mg weight g weight 1- 2 mg weight mg weight 1- 2 mg. weight mg weight * The 1 mg weight was rejected and condemned due to rough edges, a slight tear, and other imperfections. The items described above have been compared with the standards of the State of North Carolina, and are traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST via the test number shown above. All tests were performed in the North Carolina Standards Laboratory. Environmental conditions are maintained at a temperature of 22' C± 2' C and a relative humidity of 50 % ± 10 90 .

. .. LOGIST L.F. Easoa Sher*•



# ~ Teachey Sharon Denning :'an Hyder Karr:l Bryan

pap 1 Ocigiaal Cectificaee Has The NCDA Seal Embosred Above FII.ENAME: F:IGROUPSISPANDLAB*M.ESYSITRIGON\199 4 \08 94 wO 72 ^ l

### tiLDA STANDARDS LAiiUx.A1 Ux Y DEVICE TEST DATA SHEET

aa Com P Y : Address: 

## / 24 City, State, Zip: 

## ~~ A/ County: 

### ~~ ez 

### ~ Phone: 

## ( ~Q~)S~-~~ Ext Representative: 

## ~ N ~ Purchase Order No: OV c i CSC :`I umOc: :

Date:

Date Schedui

/ ed: 

## Avrrt.ir112 l9y page _/ of General Description:

~ Density of Weights: — I Total Number of Devices: _ 

### /v4 = FU3"? `

~ 

### ec LCzQ= - l mg _ .7. 7/3 1 Szri:tl Number. /eA46") Recum ia: 

### ef,



### 0-4

. 

## 1emized Description

.



# ~ 

# neeee

~ o~. 

# e Description


# ~

~

~



# 1 J

, Date Met Wort Compteted

~ - ( 

## r. yy SD ~



## 1ESf

~ 

## d n ~ 

## rtc Date Met Wort Complaed

~ 

### /g/9 I s 4e - k.t

1 2 ~ 

### 4 0/14)

,

~



### ~ ' " e ~ t,c h - A 

### r [ 

### ~ ~ -~~- Retaarl:s: ~ E ~ I ~ t a ~ u1' ~ — '

~ ~

~ (L CtL c 1'i o r.1 M

.

7 Toleri -ncc Class 

### or alibration Only Number of Devices

APP~OV~ CaGbcated Adjusted Rejected Coademtud Ice Point

~ f
~ f

— !

—

euolu;ist Receired By
~