alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v.

JAMES ROBERT SORRELL,

Defendant

- Appellant. No. 14

- 301 59

D.C. No. 2:11

- cr

- 00058

- RHW

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Washington

Robert H. Whaley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted June 22, 2015 **

Before: HAWKINS

, GRABER , and W. FLETCHER , Circuit Judges.

James Robert Sorrell appeals from the district court’ s judgment and

challenges the 18

- month s entence imposed upon revocation of supervised release.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. Appellant’s motion to submit this case on the briefs is

granted. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

JUN 25 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 14

- 30159

Sorrell contends that the district court erred by relying on impermissible

sentencing factors and by failing to explain adequately the sentence imposed

. We

review for plain error, see United States v. Miqbel , 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 ( 9th Cir.

2006), and find none. The record reflects that the district court considered the 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e) sentencing factors, did not consider impermissible sentencing

factors, and sufficiently explained its reasons for imposing the above

- Guidelines

sentence. See United States v. Carty , 520 F.3d 984, 992 (9th Cir. 2008) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
United States

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 13-209 Date: October 30, 2013 

Subject: Coverage of Children of Same-Sex Domestic Partners

On October 30, 2013, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) released final regulations to extend 

Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) and Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance 

Program (FEDVIP) eligibility to children of same-sex domestic partners of Federal employees and 

annuitants. The regulation can be found at https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2013/10/30/2013-

25734/federal-employees-health-benefits-program-and-federal-employees-dental-and-vision-insuranceprogram. The purpose of this letter is to notify you of the change in regulation. OPM will be providing 

more detailed guidance shortly that will assist you in implementing this change and counseling 

employees for FEHB and FEDVIP. 

As a result of these regulations, children of same-sex domestic partners are considered stepchildren for 

purposes of FEHB and FEDVIP. These regulations are consistent with Presidential Memoranda issued 

on June 17, 2009, and June 2, 2010, and will take effect on January 1, 2014. Eligibility will be extended 

only to the qualifying children of same-sex domestic partners. Employees or annuitants wishing to 

access these benefits must sign a domestic partnership certification in which they verify that certain 

criteria are met. Only those employees or annuitants living in a state that does not allow same-sex 

couples to marry will be able to access these benefits. 

Employees and annuitants will have the opportunity to make enrollment changes to FEHB and FEDVIP 

based on a Qualifying Life Event. Please note that employees and annuitants not currently enrolled in 

FEDVIP and who wish to elect FEDVIP coverage for the child of their same-sex domestic partner for 

the 2014 plan year will need to enroll during this upcoming Open Season. 

Thank you for your assistance. We will provide additional guidance to agencies on implementation of 

the regulation in the near future. 

Sincerely,

John O’Brien 

Director for Healthcare and Insurance
**Exhibit 35.1**

 

**Servicer Compliance Statement of John Deere Capital Corporation**

 

I, Andrew Traeger, Senior Vice President and Controller of John Deere Capital Corporation, certify:

 

A review of John Deere Capital Corporation’s activities for the period from November 1, 2013 through October 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and of John Deere Capital Corporation’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 5, 2012 among John Deere Capital Corporation, John Deere Receivables, Inc. and John Deere Owner Trust 2012-B has been made under my supervision, and to the best of my knowledge based on such review, John Deere Capital Corporation has fulfilled all its obligations under all relevant agreements in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 
| Date:   January 12, 2015 | John   Deere Capital Corporation |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          |                             |
|                          | By                               | /s/   *Andrew Traeger* |   |
|                          |                             | Andrew   Traeger |
|                          |                             | Senior   Vice President and Controller |
|                               |                                  |  |  |  |

 

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 358 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-721, K2024-14.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22644 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
NUMBERS 13-20-00216-CR & 13-20-00357-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

LUZALBERT HERNANDEZ, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 24th & 377th District Courts

of Victoria County, Texas.

ORDER

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria

Order Per Curiam

The above-numbered causes are before the Court on appellant’s second motion 

for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing en banc in appellate cause number 13-

20-00216-CR and his first motion for extension of time to file a motion for rehearing en 

banc in appellate cause number 13-20-00357-CR. Appellant’s motion in appellate cause 

number 13-20-00216-CR requested an extension of time to file a motion for rehearing en 
2

banc to March 31, 2022, but we did not receive appellant’s motion until April 1, 2022.

Appellant’s motion in appellate cause number 13-20-00357-CR requested an extension 

of time to file a motion for rehearing en banc to April 5, 2022.

The Court, on its own motion, is of the opinion that, in the interest of justice, 

appellant’s deadline to file a motion for rehearing en banc in both causes should be 

extended with order. It is therefore ordered that appellant’s deadline to file a motion for 

rehearing en banc in appellate cause numbers 13-20-00216-CR and 13-20-00357-CR is 

hereby extended to Monday, May 2, 2022. Further extensions of time will not be 

considered. We dismiss Hernandez’s pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

5th day of April, 2022.
##### 



Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.
 Notice of Grant of Stock Options  and Option Agreement
 
 Individual
    
    Option Number:
    
    00xxxxAddress
    
    Plan:
    
    2007 Incentive PlanCity State Zip
    
    ID:
    
    xxxxx
 
 
 
  Shares
    
    Vest Type
    
    Full Vest
    
    Expiration
  Grant
Date
    
    Vesting Day
    
    Vesting YearMarch 1  August 31
    
    May 31
    
    Grant Year +2 yrs and +3 yrsSeptember 1  December meeting of
compensation committee
    
    November 30
    
    Grant Year +2 yrs and +3 yrsAfter December meeting of compensation
committee  last day of February]
    
    November 30
    
    Grant Year +1 yr and +2 yrs
 
  
  you return to us within thirty (30) days from the date of this letter a signed copy
of this letter Please retain this
original letter as your documentation of this grant of Nonstatutory Stock Options and Incentive
Agreement under the Plan.
 
 
 Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.
    
    Datexxxxx
    
    Date
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance
with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 28, 2014
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3641 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure health insurance 

coverage continuity for former foster youth. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 29, 2015 

Ms. BASS (for herself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. LANGEVIN, Mr. DOGGETT, Mrs. 

WATSON COLEMAN, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Mr. 

CONYERS, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. 

JACKSON LEE, Mr. GARAMENDI, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. NORTON, Mr. PAYNE, 

Ms. CLARKE of New York, Ms. KAPTUR, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, 

Ms. SLAUGHTER, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. POCAN, 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois, Mr. KIND, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. BUTTERFIELD, Ms. 

CASTOR of Florida, Mr. LOWENTHAL, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, 

and Mr. ELLISON) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title XIX of the Social Security Act to ensure 

health insurance coverage continuity for former foster youth. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Health Insurance for 

5 Former Foster Youth Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3641 IH

1 SEC. 2. COVERAGE CONTINUITY FOR FORMER FOSTER 

2 CARE CHILDREN UP TO AGE 26. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(IX) of 

4 the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

5 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(IX)) is amended— 

6 (1) in item (bb), by striking ‘‘are not described 

7 in or enrolled under’’ and inserting ‘‘are not de8 scribed in and are not enrolled under’’; 

9 (2) in item (cc), by striking ‘‘responsibility of 

10 the State’’ and inserting ‘‘responsibility of a State’’; 

11 and 

12 (3) in item (dd), by striking ‘‘the State plan 

13 under this title or under a waiver of the’’ and insert14 ing ‘‘a State plan under this title or under a waiver 

15 of such a’’. 

16 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall take effect on the date of enactment of 

18 this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Albert E. Shahmoon, Plaintiff, *v.*Solomon E. Shahmoon, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Westchester County,

April 16, 1956.

*McQuistion, Minium & O’Connor*for plaintiff.

*Salomon $ Mainser*for defendant.

Arthur D. Brennan, J.

The plaintiff’s motion to vacate the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars is granted to the extent that items 1(a), 1(b), 6 and 10 are disallowed; in *776all other respects, the motion is denied. The plaintiff’s motion to vacate the defendant’s notice for a pretrial examination of the plaintiff’s assignor, as a witness, is granted. In this court’s opinion, a notice for a pretrial examination of a plaintiff’s assignor, as a witness, is unauthorized where said witness is a nonresident of this State and the notice requires the plaintiff to produce the witness for examination in this State. If the defendant deems that he has a right to examine said witness before trial in this State, he should proceed by motion for such relief. (See *Manley*v. *Stuart Silver Co.,*203 Misc . 218.)

Settle orders on notice.
EXHIBIT 32.1





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the annual report of STARBOARD RESOURCES, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








/s/ Michael J. Pawelek


Michael J. Pawelek


Principal Executive Officer








/s/ Eric J. Alfuth


Eric J. Alfuth


Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit2.2**AMENDMENT TO PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT**     This Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement (this “Amendment”) is entered into this1st day of October, 2007, by and between Targa Resources Holdings LP (“Seller”)and Targa Resources Partners LP (“Buyer”) as follows:     WHEREAS Seller and Buyer have heretofore entered into that certain Purchase and Sale Agreementdated September 18, 2007 (the “Purchase and Sale Agreement”) providing for the acquisitionby Buyer from Seller of certain entities which own Seller’s Texas Gathering System and LouisianaGathering System (as defined in the Purchase and Sale Agreement);     WHEREAS, Seller and Buyer desire now to amend subsection (iii) of Section 2.2 of the Purchaseand Sale Agreement to make clear how the purchase price will be calculated under Section 2.2;     NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements herein, the parties agree as follows:1. Amendment. Section 2.2 of the Purchase and Sale Agreement is hereby amended to read inits entirety as follows:     “***Section 2.2 Purchase Price***. The consideration payable by Buyer to Seller forthe Purchased Interests (the “***Purchase Price***”) shall be the cash amount calculatedas (i) Seven Hundred Five Million Dollars ($705,000,000) plus (ii) any HedgeTransfer Breakup Costs minus (iii) an amount calculated as (x) the aggregateoffering price of common units sold by Buyer to provide proceeds to acquire thePurchased Interests divided by .98 times (y) .02. The purchase price reduction insubsection (iii) above gives effect to and recognizes a deemed capital contributionby the general partner of Buyer to Buyer in such amount at the Closing.”2. Limited Effect. Except as amended hereby, the Agreement shall remain in force andeffect in accordance with its terms as currently written.3. Miscellaneous. THIS AMENDMENT WILL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THELAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF. ThisAmendment may be executed by facsimile and in counterparts and each counterpart when taken togetherwill constitute one agreement.[*Signature Page to Follow*]
 

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this Amendment effective as of the datefirst written above.
**TARGA RESROUCES HOLDINGS LP**By: Targa Resources Holdings GP LLC,its general partnerBy: /s/ Rene R. Joyce Name: Rene R. Joyce**
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Annual Report of Emerge Energy Services LP (the “Partnership”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,  Rick Shearer, President and Chief Executive Officer of Emerge Energy Services GP LLC, the general partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that:





(1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.





Date: September 16, 2015By:/s/ Rick ShearerRick ShearerPresident and Chief Executive Officer ofEmerge Energy ServicesGP LLC (the general partner ofEmerge Energy ServicesLP)





The foregoing certification is being furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

CHRISTOPHER STEVEN RICE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 2D23-91

March 27, 2024

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Susan St. John, 

Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., 

Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and David Campbell, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

BLACK, ROTHSTEIN-YOUAKIM, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur. 

Opinion subject to revision prior to official publication.
No. 72-1112.

#### Coffee-Rich, Inc., et al. *v.*Fielder, Director of Agriculture, et al.

Appeal from Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist., dismissed for want of substantial federal question.
**Exhibit
      32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Lodestar Mining, Incorporated
      (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ,
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Ian McKinnonIan
                McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer, Director, PrincipalExecutive
                Officer, Principal Financial Officer, PrincipalAccounting
                Officer, Treasurer