alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Mortgage Exchange Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brian James,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
as adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

May 20, 2010                            /s/ Brian James
                                        ---------------
                                        Brain James
                                        Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
HeinOnline -- 67 Fed. Reg. 11254 2002
OFFICER CERTIFICATE





Deutsche Mortgage & Asset
Receiving Corp. 
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates 
COMM 2012-CCRE3





March 1, 2013



Pursuant to the requirements
of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement"), it is hereby certified that on behalf of PNC Bank,
National Association d/b/a Midland Loan Services as successor by merger to Midland Loan Services, Inc. (the "Servicer"),



(i) a review of the Servicer's activities
during the calendar year 2012 (the "Reporting Period") and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under
the undersigned officer's supervision;

(ii) to the best of the undersigned
officer's knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the Reporting Period or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect,
each such failure known to the undersigned officer and the nature and status thereof are set forth below; and





Nature and Status of Failures: None.











PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCATION

d/ba MIDLAND LOAN SERVICES



Steven W. Smith

Executive Vice President









Member of The PNC Financial
Services Group

10851 Mastin Boulevard Overland
Park, Kansas 66210

800-327-8083

www.pnc.com/midland
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geovic Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Sherborne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |     |  |                                          
|----------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John E. Sherborne                    
|                        |  |  |  |     |  | John E. Sherborne Chief
Executive Officer
1 The Honorable Daniel Hovland, Chief J udge, United States District Court for the District of North Dakota. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 07-3185

___________ Mark D. Boyko, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Elizabeth A. Robinson, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellee. *

___________ Submitted: March 31, 2009 Filed: April 10, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In this civil action based upon diversity jurisdiction, Mark Boyko appeals the district court’s 1 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12( b)(2) dismissal of his complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction over the defendant, Elizabeth Robinson. Boyko has also filed in this court a “motion for a hearing de novo.”
Upon de novo review of the dismissal for lack of personal jurisdiction, see Stanton v. St. Jude Med., Inc. , 340 F.3d 690, 693 (8th Cir. 2003) (standard of review),-2- we agree with the district court that the record shows Robinson had no meaningful contacts with North Dakota and could not ha ve had “fair warning” that she could be subject to North Dakota’s jurisdiction; therefore, exercising personal jurisdiction would violate due process. See Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Maples Indus., Inc. , 97 F.3d 1100, 1102 (8th Cir. 1996) (five factors to be considered in due process determination); Gould v. P.T. Krakatau Steel , 957 F.2d 573, 576 (8th Cir. 1992) (primary issue is whether nonresident defenda nt had “fair warning” that he or she could be subject to jurisdiction of foreign sovereign).
We further conclude that Boyko’s reliance on the “effects test” is unavailing because Robinson’s actions were not inte ntionally or expressly aimed at North Dakota. See Calder v. Jones , 465 U.S. 783, 789-90 (1984) (est ablishing “effects” test: non-resident defendant must “reasonably antic ipate being haled into court” when his “intentional, and allegedly tortious, acti ons were expressly aimed at” and produced tangible effects in forum state); Dakota Indus., Inc. v. Dakota Sportswear, Inc. , 946 F.2d 1384, 1390-91 (8th Cir. 1991) (Calder“effects test” is additional factor to consider, but “[i]n relying on Calder , we do not abandon the five-part test”).
We also reject Boyko’s other arguments on appeal. First, there is nothing in the record that would lead an average person to question the district court’s impartiality. See United States v. Dehghani , 550 F.3d 716, 721 (8th Cir. 2008) (test for impartiality). Second, Boyko’s belief the c ourt ruled on the merits of his defamation and emotional-distress claims is mistaken. See Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co. , 526 U.S. 574, 584 (1999) (without personal jurisdiction district court is powerless to proceed to adjudication). Last, the court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Boyko’s complaint without a hearing. See Theunissen v. Matthews , 935 F.2d 1454, 1458 (6th Cir. 1991) (acknowledging that district court can decide properly supported Rule 12(b) motion on pleadings).
Accordingly, we affirm. Boyko’s pending motion is denied.

__________________________
#### NICHOLS v. STATE.

No. 17574.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 22, 1935.

State’s Rehearing Granted June 19, 1935.

Jas. L. Abney, of Brownsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The conviction is for a misdemeanor, the punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

The prosecution appears to have originated in the county court of Brooks county. The complaint was sworn to and filed in the office of the county clerk May 26, 1934. No information appears in the record. In the judgment of the court it is recited that the state appeared by her county attorney.

Chapter 85, Acts Regular Session, 42d Legislature, p. 128, undertakes to amend article 29, C. C. P. (Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. art. 29), by providing that in counties having no county attorney misdemeanor cases may be tried upon a complaint alone. If said act should be upheld, it is observed that the record shows that Brooks county had a county attorney. Hence the act would be inapplicable. Moreover, there is no averment in the complaint that Brooks county had no county attorney. In Day v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 74 S.W. (2d) 699, it was said, in effect, that if the act should be sustained, it would be necessary where the prosecution was on complaint alone that there be an averment in said complaint that there was no county attorney.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

MORROW, P. J., absent.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On State’s Motion for Rehearing.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

■ Since the opinion reversing the judgment of the trial court herein was delivered, counsel for the state has filed a supplemental transcript in which it is shown that the prosecution originated in the justice court. After an appeal to the county court, and, upon a trial de novo, judgment was entered assessing a fine of *726$25 against the appellant. Article 53, C. C. P., reads as follows: “The Court of Criminal Appeals shall have appellate jurisdiction co-extensive with the limits of the State in all criminal cases. This article shall not be so construed as to embrace any case which has been appealed •from any inferior court to the county court or county court at law, in which the fine imposed by the county court or county court at law shall not exceed one hundred dollars.”

Under the circumstances, this court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Lindley v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 55 S.W.(2d) 846.

The state’s motion for rehearing is granted; the judgment of reversal is set aside, and the appeal dismissed.

PER 'CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D17-2940

_____________________________

ANTHONY CORNELIUS JACKSON,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jan Shackelford, Judge.

April 23, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. 

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and BILBREY and JAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. 

Anthony Cornelius Jackson, pro se, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
| (logo) WELLS            FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

 

**A****NNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

 

 

 

**A****NNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust  Advisor  and  U.S.  Bank National Association,  as  Trustee,  with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-LC5 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of

Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.         A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1,

2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2.      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

 

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.

 

 

 

 

 

 

\s\ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 20, 2007
 SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
    
    1-33412
    
    72-1264943(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3150
Houston, Texas 77002
 (713) 910-1875
 
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 8.01 Other Events.
      -1-




---



##### 



SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.Dated:  August 21, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Roger D. BurksRoger D. BurksExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  November 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Dale E. OberkfellName:
    Dale E. OberkfellTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer
#### RIVERA v. STATE.

No. 18472.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 13, 1936.

Horace H. Shelton, of Austin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin,- for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Appellant was indicted by a grand jury of Bastrop county, Tex., on January 21, 1936, charging him with the offense of *438rape. He was placed on trial February 3, 1936, and the death penalty was assessed; the jury’s verdict being returned on February 4th.

An amended motion for new trial was filed on February 12th. It was heard and overruled on February 17th, and on that date sentence was pronounced. No notice of appeal was given. Court adjourned for the term on February 21st. On February 26th, four days after court had adjourned, a motion was filed with the clerk of the district court of Bastrop county, which motion sought to have the district judge enter what is denominated a “nunc pro tunc” order showing that notice of appeal was given on the day the motion for new trial was overruled, and to have such notice of appeal entered on the minutes of the court. The trial judge heard said motion on April 4th, and denied same. It is from the ruling last mentioned that this appeal is brought, presumably in an effort to have' this court direct the trial court to enter the order requested.

The record shows that in fact no notice of appeal was given, not that it was given and there was a failure to make a record thereof. The purpose of the motion seems to have been an. effort to secure from the trial judge an order showing that something was done which -in fact was not done.

We are not aware of any procedure or law which confers upon the Court of Criminal Appeals the right or authority to review the action of .a trial judge un-, der circumstances here shown.

The appeal is dismissed, this court having no jurisdiction.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 33885]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13317]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8349]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Fauno Rosso''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Fauno Rosso,'' imported from abroad for 
temporary exhibition within the United States, is of cultural 
significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan agreement with 
the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that the exhibition or 
display of the exhibit object at the Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art, 
Kansas City, Missouri, from on or about June 20, 2013, until on or 
about September 29, 2013, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 21, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-13317 Filed 6-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 16

- 00005

- CR

Marcelino Elias Gutierrez

v.

The State of Texas §

§

§

§

§ From Criminal District Court No. 1

o f Tarrant County (1393715R )

October 13 , 2016

Opinion by Justice Meier

(nfp)



### JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

Appellant Marcelino Elias Gutierrez filed a motion for rehearing of our

opinion that issued on August 25, 2016. We deny the motion, withdraw our

opinion and judgment dated August 25, 2016, and substitute th e following.

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s

of the trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Bill M eier

Justice Bill Meier
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pop Starz Records, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Jonathan D. Greene, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Jonathan D. Greene
                                        ----------------------
                                        Jonathan D. Greene, CEO and
                                        principal executive officer

August 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2007020EN.01000101.xml

| 27.1.2007 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 20/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.1.2007

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 20/1

---

(2007/C 20/01)

Last publication of the Court of Justice in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

OJ C 326, 30.12.2006

OJ C 326, 30.12.2006

Past publications

OJ C 310, 16.12.2006

OJ C 294, 2.12.2006

OJ C 281, 18.11.2006

OJ C 261, 28.10.2006

OJ C 249, 14.10.2006

OJ C 237, 30.9.2006

These texts are available on:

| | EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu |
| --- | --- |

EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu

---
#### THOMAS v. STATE.

No. 15565.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

Cline & Cline, of Port Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

The conviction is for burglary of a private residence; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of five years.

The appellant entered a plea of guilty and waived a jury.

There is found in the record an unverified statement of the appellant, signed by Charles Thomas and Cline & Cline, his attorneys, stat*607ing that the plea of guilty, was due to the persuasion of the attorney who was appointed to represent him. The matter is not presented here by a statement of facts or otherwise, sa that this court may be authorized to review the subject.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the registrant certify, to the best of their knowledge, that the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the "Form 10-Q") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the registrant.  Alpha Lujo, Inc.  Date: May 20, 2011  /s/ William Tien William Tien Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer