alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31**

SEMT 2012-4 

EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification. 

I, Christopher J.Abate, certify that: 

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and allreports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust2012-4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); 

2.    Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of thedistribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of RegulationAB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and 

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their relatedattestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer,and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent. 

Date: March 31, 2017 

 

Chairman of the Board, President and Chief FinancialOfficer 

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

NICK R. SMITH , P etitioner ,

v. Civil Action No. 20

- 301 ( JEB) U NITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent
.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

P ro se P etitioner Nick R. Smith’s habeas Petition strings together a series of farfetched allegations , requiring sua sponte dismissal for lack of subject

- matter jurisdiction. Smith commences his pleading thus: “Here now comes the Government of New Zion a Sovereign Ecclesiastic State, the Petitioner On behalf of the HRM King Nicodemus ( By the people and the Constitution of New Zion King ), aka Nicki Ray Smith a Citizens owned by (as per Exhibit #’s 1,2,3 and 7, ) and subject of New Zion an International Corporation an d a nonprofit Corporation in the USA . . . .” Pet. at 1

- 2 . He later continues: “Petititioner’s now shows the Worldwide objective claim of ‘stated claim’ that he is king of a kingdom of a country of government established by god himself with blessing of t he threat toward the authority of a sovereign state of a new nation of freedom power of hope and peace and security justice . . .” Id.

at 3 (all caps deleted). There are further attachments purporting to show, e.g. , the oath of citizenship of New Zion, i d. , Exh. 2, a Certificate of Citizenship for King Nicodemus of New Zion, id. , Exh. 3, and the New Zion Constitution. Id. , Exh. 4.2 On rare occasions, a court may dismiss a case sua sponte for lack of subject

- matter jurisdiction. This occurs where a comp laint is “ ‘ patently insubstantial , ’ presenting no federal question suitable for decision.” Best v. Kelly , 39 F.3d 328, 330 (D.C. Cir. 1994) ( quoting
Neitzke v. Williams , 490 U.S. 319, 327 n. 6 (1989)) (additional citation omitted) . This standard requires that the “claims be flimsier than ‘doubtful or questionable’

– they must be ‘ essentially
fictitious. ’ ” Id. (quoting Hagans v. Levine , 415 U.S. 528, 536

- 37 (1973)). Claims that fall into this category include “bizarre conspiracy theories , any fantastic government manipulations of [the] will or mind, [an d] any sort of supernatural intervention .” Id. As a gener al rule, this procedural vehicle is “ reserved for complaints resting on truly fanciful factua l allegations,” while 12(b)(6) dismissals “ cull legally deficient complaints. ” Id. at 331 n.5.

A s Petitioner’s status and thus his factual allegations are fanciful at best , the Court will dismiss the case without prejudice. In any event, the only poss ible legal claims he articulates
relate to state trial proceedings in Georgia, see Pet. at 3

- 4, which this Court has no power to
review. A separate Order memorializing the dismissal will issue this day.

**/s/ James E. Boasberg** JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge

Date: February 7, 2020
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-10837

(Summary Calendar)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

IRA WAYNE PRIVETTE,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(USDC No. 4:94-CV-357)

May 16, 1996

Before GARWOOD, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appellant Ira Wayne Privette appeals the denial o f his

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his sentence, in which he argued

that the prosecution knowingly us ed the perjured testimony of a

conspirator, his attorney performed ineffectively in several

instances, the court erred in applying the Sentencing Guidelines to

him, and the co-conspirator and government conspired to frame him.1 S ee United States v. Elwood

, 993 F.2d 1146, 1151 (5th Cir.

1993) (co-conspirator liable for substantive § 924(c) offense

committed by another conspirator).

2 On appeal, Privette has abandoned his assertions that the

government attempted to frame him. S ee Yohey v. Collins

, 985 F.2d

222, 225 (5th Cir. 1993). In its place, he has added a new claim:

that his conviction for using a firearm during and in relation to

a drug-tr afficking crime is invalid under a recent Supreme Court

case, Bailey v. United States

, 116 S. Ct. 501 (1995). The court

declines to address this claim as it is raised for the first time

on appeal from denial of habeas relief, and Privette has not shown

plain error. See Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass’n

,

F.3d (5th Cir. Mar. 28, 1996) (No. 95-50007). In any

event, the Bailey claim is without merit because the only firearms

count of which Privette now stands convicted (count 9) alleged that

Apodaca used the firearm, and Privette was criminally responsible

for that use as a willful and knowing co-conspirator of Apodaca.

The evidence clea rly established that Apodaca was “using” a gun

within the meaning of Bailey

. 1 As for the remainder of Privette’s

claims, this court has reviewed the record, the parties’ arguments,

the magistrate judge’s findings, and the district court’s adoption

of those findings. S ee United States v. Privette

, No. 4:94-CV-357-

D (5th Cir. Aug. 18, 1995). This court affirms for essentially the

reasons cited by the magistrate judge.

AFFIRMED.
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 17530.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 17, 1935.

Ramey A. Smith, of Sulphur Springs, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft of an automobile over the value of $50; punishment being assessed at six years in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges the offense. No statement of facts or bills of exception are in the record. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32b

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18of the United States Code

I,
Thomas M. OFlynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report
of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated.

| |                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------
| | /s/ Thomas
 M. OFlynn                       
| |                                              
| | Thomas M. OFlynn                            
| | Public
 Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
| | Chief
 Financial Officer                     
| | February 27,
 2008                           

---
|us bank(logo) | All of us serving you
|------------- | ---------------------



Annual Statement of Compliance

Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch
Trust 2012-C5



VIA: EMAIL



Morgan Stanley Capital I
Inc.

1585 Broadway

New York, New York 10036

Attention: Stephen Holmes

stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com



|Re: | ThePooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”)
dated as of July 1, 2012 among Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., as depositor, Bank of America, National Association, as master servicer,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as special servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator,
certificate registrar and authenticating agent
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I, Kimberly O. Jacobs,
a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator, as a certifying servicer hereby certify
that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such Reporting Period



Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date: March 1, 2018



U.S. Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator





|By: | /s/ Kimberly
    O. Jacobs | 
|--- | -------------------------- | 
|    | Kimberly O. Jacobs         | 
|    | Senior Vice President      |
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Morry
Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ MORRY F.
      RUBINAugust
      14, 2008
            
            Morry
      F. RubinChief
      Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

September 10, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 134060 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 134060 

 COA: 276605

 Presque Isle CC: 05-092274-FH 

CHRISTOPHER ROBYN CANNON,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 10, 2007 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0830 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 10, 2007 

 Clerk
##### 



William L. Transier
Chairman of the Board, President &Chief Executive Officer
(713) 307-8730 Phone
(713) 307-8793 Fax
    
    (ENDEAVOUR LOGO)
  
    BASE COMPENSATION
 EQUITY AWARD AT EMPLOYMENT
 BENEFITS COVERAGE
  Endeavour International Corporation




---



##### 



RELOCATION TO HOUSTON
 VACATION 
    
  Endeavour International Corporation
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 17541]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07460]

[[Page 17541]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 9074]

Notice of Public Comments on FY 2016 U.S. Refugee Admissions 
Program

    The United States actively supports efforts to provide protection, 
assistance, and durable solutions for refugees. The U.S. Refugee 
Admissions Program (USRAP) is a critical component of the United 
States' overall refugee protection efforts around the globe. In Fiscal 
Year 2015, the President established the ceiling for refugee admissions 
into the United States at 70,000 refugees.
    As we begin to prepare the FY 2016 U.S. Refugee Admission Program, 
we welcome the public's input. Information about the Program can be 
found at http://www.state.gov/g/prm/. Persons wishing to submit written 
comments on the appropriate size and scope of the FY 2016 U.S. Refugee 
Admissions Program should submit them by 5 p.m. on Thursday, May 14, 
2015 via email to spruellda@state.gov or fax (202) 453-9393.
    If you have questions about submitting written comments, please 
contact Delicia Spruell, PRM/Admissions Program Officer at 
spruellda@state.gov.

    Dated: March 25, 2015.
Simon Henshaw,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Population, Refugees, 
and Migration, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2015-07460 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4710-33-P
```
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2558

___________

Kenneth W. Thompson, *

*

Petitioner, *

* Petition for Review from 

v. * Decision of the Railroad

* Retirement Board.

Railroad Retirement Board, *

* [UNPUBLISHED]

Respondent. *

___________

 Submitted: December 22, 1997 

 Filed: December 31, 1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth W. Thompson petitions for review of the Railroad Retirement Board&s

(RRB) denial of his application for a disability annuity under the Railroad Retirement

Act. 

We affirm decisions of the RRB where the decision is supported by substantial

evidence, has a reasonable basis in law, and is not arbitrary. See Bowman v. Railroad

Retirement Bd., 952 F.2d 207, 210 (8th Cir. 1991). We use the same disability

standard as under the Social Security Act, and we use Social Security case law as

precedent. Id. at 209.
-2-

We conclude that the hearings officer gave proper consideration to Thompson&s

subjective complaints of pain. See Polaski v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1320, 1322 (8th Cir.

1984) (factors). We further conclude that the hypotheticals posed to the vocational

expert (VE) were proper, as they included Thompson&s specific vocational

characteristics and those functional restrictions accepted as true by the hearings officer.

See Roberts v. Heckler, 783 F.2d 110, 112 (8th Cir. 1985) (per curiam) (“hypothetical

is sufficient if it sets forth the impairments which are accepted as true”). Therefore, the

VE&s testimony constitutes substantial evidence supporting the hearings officer&s

decision. See Bowman, 952 F.2d at 211 (hearings officer&s conclusion was based on

substantial evidence where he considered VE&s testimony and claimant&s specific

characteristics in concluding claimant could perform other work).

Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Railroad Retirement Board.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
POWER OF ATTORNEY



     The undersigned Joseph M. Hirko, in his capacity as Senior Vice

President and Chief Financial Officer of Portland General Corporation (the

"Corporation"), hereby appoints Joseph E. Feltz, Controller of the

Corporation, as the attorney-in-fact, in any and all capacities stated

herein, to execute on behalf of the undersigned and to file with the

Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of

1934, the second amendment to Portland General Corporation's Annual Report

on Form 10-K / A, for the year ended December 31, 1996.

     Dated:    June 26, 1997



                                      /S/ JOSEPH M. HIRKO
                                          Joseph M. Hirko



POWER OF ATTORNEY -- 10-K/A

<PAGE>
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Payroll Office Letter 

Number: P-00-11 Date: May 4, 2000

Subject: JOINT BENEFIT OFFICER/PAYROLL OFFICE MEETING

There will be joint meeting of personnel and payroll officials, regarding the

implementation of FEHB Premium Conversion. We believe it would be very

beneficial for those individuals responsible for the implementation to attend. 

Please call us on 202-606-0606, if you have any questions.

Subject: FEHB Premium Conversion

Place: Office of Personnel Management

Campbell Auditorium

1900 E Street, NW

Washington, DC 20415

Date: May 17, 2000

Time: 10:00 – 11:30

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, James W. Sullivan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reliance Bancshares, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release33-8238; 34-47986];c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 14, 2007 By: /s/ James W. Sullivan       Name:James W. Sullivan      Title:Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

I, Charles E. Phillips, Jr., certify that:

1. I have reviewed
this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Infor, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.



|                    |  |  |  |  |  |                                     
|------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: July 26, 2017 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ CHARLES E. PHILLIPS, JR.        
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Charles E. Phillips, Jr.            
|                    |  |  |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and Director
/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 14, 2015

No. 04-14-00715-CV

TK HANKS LP and Paloma Capital LLC,

Appellants

v.

ENERFIN FIELD SERVICES LLC,

Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-07-00120-CVL

Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding

O RDER

On January 9, 2015, the appellee filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal stating

that the parties have reached an agreement settling this matter but they need time to prepare the 

documents related to their agreement. The motion further states that the parties anticipate filing 

documents in this court seeking final disposition of this appeal. The motion is GRANTED, and 

this appeal is ABATED. All appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of this court.

_________________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of January, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court