alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Golden Tan, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to her knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: October 10, 2007


/s/ Kim McElroy
---------------------------------
Kim McElroy, President and C.E.O.
(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Barney Harford, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




May 6, 2011/s/ BARNEY HARFORDBarney HarfordChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A-1 of Show Me Ethanol, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the each of the undersigned Chief Restructuring Officer and General Manager and the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  December 4, 2009

 

| By:    | /s/ Richard A. Hanson   |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
| Name:  | Richard A. Hanson       |   |
| Title: | General Manager         |   |
|   |                    |   |
|   |                    |   |
| By:    | /s/ Richard A. Hanson   |   |
| Name:  | Richard A. Hanson       |   |
| Title: | Chief Financial Officer |   |

 

 

 

----
United States Office of Personnel Management

Office of the Chief Financial Officer

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 24-302 Date: December 2023

Subject: Calendar Year 2024 Retired Federal Employees Health 

Benefits Premiums

This letter is to inform you of the calendar year (CY) 2024 subscription rates for 

annuitants enrolled in the Retired Federal Employees Health Benefits (REHB) Program 

under the Uniform Plan and the Private Plans. Beginning January 1, 2024, the Uniform 

Plan and Private Plans REHB Premiums have changed.

The 2024 rates for the Uniform plan (codes 963 and 966) are as follows:

Table 1: 2024 Rates for Uniform Plan

Description Monthly Pay 

Period for 

963 (Self)

Monthly Pay 

Period for 966 

(Family)

Four-week Pay 

Period for 963 

(Self)

Four-week Pay 

Period for 966 

(Family)

Enrollee $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

Government 174.70 349.40 161.26 322.52

Total $174.70 $349.40 $161.26 $322.52
Benefits Administration Letter 24-302 

2 

For Private Plans, the maximum Government contributions are:

Table 2: 2024 Rates for Private Plans

Description Monthly Pay 

Period Group A 

(Self)

Monthly Pay 

Period Group B 

(Self)

Four-week Pay 

Period Group A 

(Self)

Four-week Pay 

Period Group B 

(Self)

Government $174.70 $349.40 $161.26 $322.52

Group A consist of codes: 921, 923, 931, 933, 941, 943, 945, 951, and 953.

Group B consist of codes: 922, 924, 932, 934, 942, 944, 946, 947, 952, and 954.

If you have questions about this letter, please send an email to

FinancialBALs@opm.gov or call 202-606-0606. We look forward to assisting you.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
     /s/ David W. SharpDavid W. SharpPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Horizon Offshore, Inc.
#### HUTTO v. STATE.

No. 15385.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1932.

Jim Baker, of Dallas, for appellant.

Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, fifteen .years in the penitentiary.

We find in this record but one bill of exception, which is wholly insufficient for the purpose intended. It sets up that, when the trial court heard appellant’s motion for new trial, permission was requested to present testimony touching the allegations contained in the motion, and that .the request was refused. Nowhere in said bill is there set forth any allegation of the motion for new trial concerning or supporting which appellant desired to introduce testimony. Nor does the bill of exception contain any statement of any person purporting to set out what testimony appellant desired to introduce. The motion for new trial appearing in the record seems to manifest some six or eight grounds upon which a new trial was asked. It is clear that this court cannot appraise the supposed error presented by such a bill of exception. In his brief appellant goes into a discussion of the supposed error of the court in refusing 'to grant an amended motion for new trial sought because of newly discovered testimony. We have examined the affidavits attached to said amended motion, and fail to find anything therein indicating that the testimony thus referred to was of any materiality. The injured party nowhere claimed that appellant was driving a yellow car, nor is the state’s case in any wise combated by affidavits of witnesses attempting to show that appellant at no time owned a yellow car.

The prosecuting witness positively identified appellant as the man who robbed him, as did a witness who came along the place in time to observe appellant shooting at the prosecuting witness who had followed him out in the street. We find in the record nothing indicating that appellant has not had a fair and impartial trial.

The judgment will be affirmed.
**Exhibit 16.1**August 17, 2007United States Securities and Exchange Commission
#### RAY v. STATE.

No. 16808.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 23, 1934.

Bozeman & Cathey, of Quitman, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for manufacturing intoxicating liquor, punishment assessed at four years in the penitentiary.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### R. Leon LEAMON, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20632.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

Graham Bruce, of Orange, for appellant.

, Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

. Appellant was convicted of driving an automobile upon a public highway while he was intoxicated, punishment being assessed at a fine of $200 and five days in the county jail.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising that he does not desire to further prosecute his appeal, and at his request same is ordered dismissed.
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 6-K
 REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the month of October 2007
 Commission File Number: 001-32179
 INTEROIL CORPORATION
  THE
YUKON TERRITORY
 60-92 COOK STREET
PORTSMITH, QLD 4870, AUSTRALIA
 (61) 7 4046 4600
  o þ
 o
 o
  o þ




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  SIGNATURESExhibit IndexRevised Management's Discussion and Analysis Period Ended March 31, 2007Revised Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for Period Ended March 31, 2007 and 2006    Table of Contents  
 SIGNATURES
  INTEROIL CORPORATIONBy:
    /s/ Phil MulacekPhil MulacekChief Executive OfficerDate: October 29, 2007




---



##### Table of Contents



INTEROIL CORPORATION
FORM 6-K FOR THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2007
 
 Exhibit Index
 1.
    
    Revised Managements Discussion and Analysis for the three month period ended March 31, 2007.2.
    
    Revised Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements for three month period ended March 31,
2007 and 2006.
1 

### Daniels, Nia (FAA)

From: Daniels, Nia (FAA)

Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 1:45 PM

To: 'hello@reelreverie.com'

Cc: '333exemptions@faa.gov' Subject: Petition for Exemption: Reel Re verie MediaWorks, Inc. (FAA-2015-0743)



### May 28, 2015

Dear Mr. Vlk:

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-0743). This information is necessary for the Fe deral Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make, mode l, and type (i.e. - fixed-wing, ro torcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operation. The description shoul d include the maximum weight (including payload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, S ection 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operat ion please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit any proprietary information to the FAA Hea dquarters or electronically via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov . If you want us to process your request a ny further, we must receive the information described above by June 11, 2015. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

Nia Daniels Program Analyst

Nia Daniels, ARM

‐ 108

Federal Aviation Administration

Office of Rulemaking, Airmen & Airspace Rules Division

800 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20591

PH: (202) 267 ‐ 7626

Fax: (202) 267 ‐ 5075 nia.daniels@faa.gov
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency 

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter
 

Number: 03-304 Date: March 18, 2003 

Subject: FEHB Imputed Cost Factor for the Second Quarter of FY 2003 

In Benefit Administration Letter (BAL) 03-302 dated January 15, 2003, we provided the cost 

factors and guidelines for calculating your imputed costs for the first quarter of FY 2003. This 

letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employee Health Benefit Program 

(FEHB) for the second quarter of FY 2003. The imputed cost factors related to “Pensions” and 

Life Insurance will rarely change during the fiscal year and are not provided in this letter. 

Please refer to BAL 03-302 for the imputed cost factors relating to “Pensions” and Life 

Insurance as well as for the guidelines for computing your imputed costs. 

The imputed cost factor for the second quarter of FY 2003 related to the FEHB is $934. Thus, 

the FY 2003 year-to-date imputed cost factor related to the FEHB is: 

1st Quarter $918 

2nd Quarter 934 

Year-to-date $1,852

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at 

finance@opm.gov, so we have a record of them. You may of course call us on 202-606-0606. 

Robert A. Yuran, Chief 

Financial Reporting and Policy 

Group 

Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

Insurance 

Program
Auburn-Lewston 

Municipal Airport 

FIv to ME A 

C_-ity of Auburn^ JVlaine 

"Maine's Cifi/ ofOpporliiuil}/" 

Office of tlie Mayor 

August 16, 2010 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Attn: Honorable Ray LaHood, Secretary 

400 7* Street SW 

Washington, D.C 20590 

Dear Secretary LaHood. 

The Mayor and City Council of Auburn. Maine are please to write this letter of support for 

the Aubum-LeM^ton Municipal Airport's federal grant application to bring passenger service to 

the Lewislon-Aubum area. 

Lewiston-Aubum is the second largest community in Maine with over half of the State's 

population residing within a SO-mlle radius, (t )s also home to some of the state's largest andmost successful companies, including: Proctor and Gamble's Tambrands, GE, Geiger and a 

Wal-Mart Distribution Center. Lewiston-Aubum is a major service center for surrouiKling 

communities; attracting customers for medical care, professional services, as well as retail and 

dining opportunities Cunrently, residents from Lewiston-Aubum and the surrounding 

communities must travel to Portland, Maine or further for commercial air service. For some 

communities that involves a 90-minutes or more drive, one-way. 

We strongly support the Aubum-Lewiston Municipal Airport's quest to obtain commercial 

air service to serve one or more major hubs in addition to the businesses and recreational 

needs of the Lewiston-Aubum area. 

c : 3 • 

i '7> 

i 

xr 

'0 

* 

cn 

xr 

. - -- J • V • '-._• ' 

^V,$^:P :^'r^^^ 

-aO ^ 

m-^ m 

22 2;-H 

^:- ^ W J 

Mayor Richard D. Gle^^n 

Councilor Robert P./fiayes, Ward 2 

QMftdUr'Michaei J. F^rrell, Ward 1 

Daniel R. Hemck, Ward 3 

Councilor Belinda A. Gerry, Aj^Large CMiftcilof Eric G. Samson, At-Latge 

60 Court Street » Suite 150 • Auburn, I^IE 04210 

(207) 333-6600 Voice • (207) 333-6601 Automated • (207) 333-6623 Fax 

www.aubummainc.gov 

Auburn-Lewiston Municipal Airport - Small Community Air Service Development Grant -August 2010 2'3>
## pOT-oSr- Z 0 0 3 ^ iSS b 3 Schlemmer , Kevi n (OST) From : JERRYOSULL@aol.co m Sent : Tuesday , Marc h 13 , 201 2 2:4 1 P M To : Devany , Denni s (OST) ; mbowman@gosilver.com ; Schlemmer , Kevi n (OST) ; EA S (OST ) Cc : drichardson@gosilver.co m Subject : Re : LW B Extensio n Reques t i3 i Mr
. Denni s DeVany , ^ 7 ^ c± ^ Greenbrie rValle yAirport ha s n o objectio n t o th e requeste d extension
. rn-^:r T

" 0 "::P'-tli ^ JerryO'Sullivan , Airport Manage rp ro § V i I n a messag e date d 3/13/201 2 9:11:2 4 A.M
. Easter n Dayligh t Time , Dennis.DeVanv@dot.go vwrites : 3 

### Go t it , thx

From : Micke yBowma n rmailto:mbowman@aosilver.com l Sent : Tuesday , Marc h 13 , 201 2 9:0 7 A M To : Schlemmer , Kevi n (OST) ; Devany , Denni s (OST) ; EA S (OST ) Cc : JerryO'Sullivan ; Darrel l Richardso n Subject : LW B Extensio n Reques t Importance : Hig h



### Silve r Airway s woul dlik e t o reques t anextensio no f

th e deadlin e for

submission s i nrespons e t o th e RF Pfor Greenbrier/Lewisburg , WV
. Pleas e se e attache dfiling
. Bes t regards
.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7200

HERBERT COOK, JR., a/k/a Herbert Cooke,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-97-1396-AM)

Submitted: December 17, 1998 Decided: January 6, 1999

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Herbert Cook, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Kenneth Byrum, Jr.,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Herbert Cook, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Cook v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. CA-97-1396-AM (E.D. Va. July 22, 1998). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 08730**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name Description**  x 08730\08730_Checklist.XLS EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

08730\08730_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist 08730\08730_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted x 08730\08730_PartA.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 08730\08730_PartB.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 08730\08730_PartC.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 08730\08730_PartD.XLS Plant submitted survey file x 08730\08730_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

08730\Certification Statement Plant ID 08730.PDF Plant certification statement x 08730\Supporting Documentation\08730_Calc.doc EPA Technical Review Notes

08730\Supporting Documentation\08730_MAP-1 Holcomb Station.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 08730\Supporting Documentation\08730_MAP-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 08730\Supporting Documentation\08730_MAP-2 Holcomb Station.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey 08730\Supporting Documentation\08730_MAP-2.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08730\Supporting Documentation\08730_WB-1 Holcomb Station.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 08730\Supporting Documentation\08730_WB-1.PDF Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database

. 2Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### JARROTT v. STATE.

No. 16706.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1934.

Louis T. Holland, of Montague, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, and his punishment assessed at confinement in. the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 3, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 410 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-771, K2024-64.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22748 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of The MaryJane Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended April
30, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Joel C. Schneider, Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 

| | (2) | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Joel C. Schneider   | 
|----------------------- | 
|Joel C. Schneider      
|Chief Executive Officer
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|August 29, 2014        



A
signed original of this certification has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.