alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.2


		
			Exhibit 10.2
		

		
			 
		

		
			FIRST AMENDMENT - EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
		

		
			 
		

		
			This Amendment (the “Amendment”) is entered into as of October 13, 2017 (the “Amendment Effective Date”) by and between AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC., as successor in interest to AMC Entertainment Inc. (“Company”) and STEPHEN COLANERO (“Executive”), and amends the Employment Agreement between Company and Executive dated November 24, 2009 (the “Agreement”).  Each of Company and Executive are referred to herein as a “Party” and collectively as the “Parties”.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement, unless otherwise defined herein.
		

		
			 
		

		
			RECITALS
		

		
			WHEREAS, AMC and Executive have agreed to amend the Agreement as more particularly described herein;
		

		
			 
		

		
			NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises set forth herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:
		

		
			 
		

		
			*****
		

			
	
			
				 I.
			

			
	
			
			Section 2 is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:




		
			 
		

		
			2. Period of Employment.  The “Period of Employment” shall be a period of two years commencing on the Effective Date and ending at the close of business on the second anniversary of the Effective Date (the “Termination Date”); provided,  however, that this Agreement shall be automatically renewed, and the Period of Employment shall be automatically extended, for one (1) additional year on the Termination Date and each anniversary of the Termination Date thereafter.  The term “Period of Employment” shall include any extension thereof pursuant to the previous sentence.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Period of Employment is subject to earlier termination as provided below in this Agreement.
		

		
			 
		

			
	
			
				 II.
			

			
	
			
			Entire Agreement.  Except as herein expressly amended, all terms, covenants and provisions of the Agreement are and shall remain in full force and effect, and all references therein to such Agreement shall henceforth refer to the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment.  This Amendment shall be deemed incorporated into, and a part of, the Agreement.  




		
			 
		

		
			IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Amendment to be duly executed by their authorized representatives as of the Amendment Effective Date.
		

		
			AMC ENTERTAINMENT HOLDINGS, INC.STEPHEN COLANERO
		

		
			 
		

		
			By/s/ Adam Aron/s/ Stephen A Colanero
		

		
			
		

		
			Name:Adam Aron
		

		
			Title:CEO & President
OPM/SSA FEDMER

RI 20-114September 1998
##### 



(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or section
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership.
 Dated:  August 3, 2007
    /s/ Patricia M. WiederholtPatricia M. WiederholtPrincipal Financial Officer and Controller
TransCanada Northern Border Inc., Operator
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. Todd Huskinson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ W. Todd HuskinsonName: W. Todd Huskinson Date: March 11, 2013
#### George W. Olin, Plaintiff, *v.*George H. Warner et al., Defendants.

County Court, Jefferson County,

June 9, 1958.

*Francis P. Burns*for plaintiff.

*Richard F. Schwemmann*for defendants.

Milton A. Wilts®, J.

It is determined that the petition of the owner of the premises in this proceeding is dismissed.

It has been so decided upon testimony adduced by the parties, and upon all of the papers filed herein, wherein it appears as a factual matter that the clause in a certain lease that has been admitted in evidence upon a trial of the issues herein and which cover the premises in question, namely, a certain dock and adjoining premises that are adjacent to other properties purchased by the occupants from the owner upon certain terms and conditions contained in the aforesaid lease, are the alleged basis for the removal of the aforesaid occupants; that the only terms and conditions upon which the owner relies are certain statements relating to the furnishing of an insurance policy for indemnity to cover any person suffering injuries upon the leased" premises; that a violation, if any, of that particular clause, is one that would not afford the owner the relief *911sought. His action, if any, should be predicated upon an action for damages.

There was no showing that anyone was damaged and there was testimony to the effect that a public liability policy had been carried by the occupants, except for a period of approximately three months in the winter of 1957-1958 and that thereafter, the occupants had procured another public liability policy and had asked the owner to join in execution of same, and had tendered to the insurance company the policy, with their application and a premium, but that the owner would not join in same even though he was relieved from all financial responsibility for the premium on the policy by the action of the occupants.

It is suggested, although this statement may not be considered as part of the decision and the accompanying order, that the owner, if he wishes to have the terms of the aforesaid lease literally complied with, proceed to comply with the necessary requirements of any policy of insurance that have been tendered by the occupants, in order to effectually meet terms of the aforesaid lease. It is further the feeling of this court, although no determination is allowed in that respect hereunder, that the owner’s failure to make it possible for the occupants to carry out all of the terms and conditions of the lease upon which the present proceeding is determined, makes a situation in which the occupants are *“*stymied ” by the failure of the owner to perform the conditions that he should perform.

To reiterate, upon all of the grounds mentioned, the petition of the owner is dismissed upon all of the available testimony and papers relating to this proceeding, with the right of the owner or occupants to institute whatever other proceeding is deemed applicable under the law.

An order to this effect may be entered.
SPA 8
 

• RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 67 

Testing and Monitoring Activities 

54 FR 40260-40269 

September 29, 1989 

(Non-HSWA Cluster VI) 

Technical corrections were made to this rule at 55 FR 8948 (March 9, 1990). These corrections are 

addressed by Revision Checklist 73 which will be made available through SPA 9. States are 

encouraged to adopt the technical corrections at th~ same time that the Revision Checklist 67 

provisions are adopted. 

STATE ANALOG IS:
 

FEDERAL ANALOGOUS MORE BROADFEDERAL RCRA STATE EQUIV- STRIN- ER IN 

REQUIREMENT CITATION CITATION ALENT GENT SCOPE 

PART 260 - HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
 

SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
 

• 

change last clause 

of sentence regarding 

the Second Edition into 

a sentence combining 

it with the price 

information 260.11 (a) 11 O(3)(a)· x 

PART 261 - IDENTIFICATION AND LISTING OF HAZARDOUS WASTE 

APPENDIX III - CHEMICAL ANALYSIS TEST METHODS
 

revise Table 2 as 

shown, replacing First 

Edition information 

with Third Edition 

information Appendix III 110(3)(f) X 

revise Table 3, as 

shown, replacing First 

Edition information 

with Third Edition 

information Appendix III 110(3)(f) X 

•
EXHIBIT 10.2





CONFIDENTIAL & PURSUANT TO COMMON INTEREST PRIVILEGE





March 29, 2011





Mr. Barney Harford


Chief Executive Officer


Orbitz Worldwide, LLC


500 W. Madison St., Suite 1000


Chicago, IL 60661





RE:  Agreement Relating to AA Ticketing Authority dated February 1, 2011 between Travelport,


LP (“Travelport”) and Orbitz Worldwide, LLC (“OWW”) (the “AA Ticketing Authority


Agreement”)





Dear Barney:





Travelport and OWW' agree to amend the AA Ticketing Authority Agreement as set forth herein.





|   |                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | Travelport and OWW agree to delete Section 4 of the AA Ticketing Authority Agreement in its entirety and to replace it with the following:




“4.  Effectiveness .  This Agreement shall become effective as of the Effective Date and shall continue to be in effect until the earliest of (a) August 31, 2011, (b) the date, if any on which OWW's ticketing authority is reinstated by AA for Orbitz.com, or (c) the date, if any, that (i) the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of OWW (the “Audit Committee”), acting reasonably and in good faith, shall determine that OWW and AA are engaged (directly or indirectly) in discussions that are reasonably likely to result in OWW having a Direct Connect (as defined in the Subscriber Agreement) relationship with AA, or (ii) OWW consummates a Direct Connect relationship (directly or indirectly) with AA.  OWW shall ensure that the Audit Committee will diligently monitor any discussions that OWW may have regarding a potential Direct Connect relationship with AA and will make a determination such as described in clause (c)(i) of the previous sentence as soon as such a determination is reasonably justified.  In addition, OWW will notify Travelport immediately if any of the events described in clauses (a), (b), (c)(i) and (c)(ii) of the first sentence of this Section 4 occurs, in which event, effective as of the date of the earliest of such event, this Agreement shall be terminated and of no further force and effect.”








All other terms of the AA Ticketing Authority Agreement shall remain unchanged.





The parties have caused this letter agreement to be executed by the signatures of their respective authorized representatives.











Orbitz Worldwide, LLCTravelport, LP/s/ Barney Harford/s/ Travis ChristName: Barney HarfordName: Travis ChristTitle: CEOTitle: President, AmericasDate: 3/28/11Date: 3/29/11
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
    W-H ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
    PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  Form 10-Q
      
      Rule 13a-14(b)
 25
Exhibit 32.1.1

CERTIFICATION

I, James E. Schuster, principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (the
Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ James E. Schuster        
|James E. Schuster, President 
|(Principal Executive Officer)

May 7, 2008
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23175]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Support for Research Excellence 
(SuRE) Award and SuRE-First Independent Research (SuRE-First) Award 
(R16 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: November 7, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F36, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Noton K. Dutta, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3F36, 
Rockville, MD 20892, 240-669-2857, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e28c8d968d8ccc8697969683a28c8b8acc858d94"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6c020318030242081918180d2c020504420b031a">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: October 2, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23175 Filed 10-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  1.
    
    The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
  /s/ W. Kirk Brassfield
#### Stegmaier *v.*Keystone Coal Company, Appellant.

*Corporations*— Mortgages—Trustees — *Death*— *Appointment of successor*— Act *of June 16,1886, P. L. 784.*

Where the trustee of a corporation mortgage died without having performed any active duties, although the mortgage contained no provision for the appointment of a successor, the lower court properly appointed a successor to the trustee, upon the petition of the holders of overdue and unpaid mortgage bonds, in order that *209steps might be taken to foreclose the mortgage and enforce payment of the bonds.

Argued April 12, 1916.

Appeal, No. 106, Jan. T., 1916, by Victoria Schmitt, Executrix of the estate of John A. Schmitt, deceased, intervening defendant, from decree of C. P. Luzerne Co., Oct. T., 1909, No. 10, in equity, appointing a trustee in case of C. E. Stegmaier and Louise S. Forve, Executors of Charles Stegmaier, ' deceased, and H. E. Meeker v. Keystone Coal Company and Victoria Schmitt, Executrix, Intervenor.

Before Potter, Stewart, Moschzisker, Frazer and Walling, JJ.

Affirmed.

Bill in equity for the appointment of a trustee. Before O’Boyle, J.

The opinion of the Supreme Court states the facts.

The court awarded the relief prayed for. Victoria Schmitt, executrix of the estate of John A. Schmitt, deceased, appealed.

*Errors assigned*were in dismissing exceptions to various findings of fact and law of the trial judge and the decree of the court.

*Edmund G. Butler,*with him *F. W. Wheaton*and *P. F. O’Neill,*for appellant.

*William S. McLean, Jr.,*with him *William S. McLean*and *George R. McLean,*for appellee.

May 28, 1916:

Per Curiam,

It appears from the record in this case, that the trustee named in a corporation mortgage died, having performed no active duties. The mortgage contained no provision for the appointment of a successor, but upon petition of the holders in pledge of overdue and unpaid mortgage bonds, the chancellor was clearly right in appointing, *210pursuant to the provisions of the Act of June 16, 1836, P. L. 784, a successor to the trustee, in order that proper steps may he taken to foreclose the mortgage, and enforce payment of the bonds!

The assignments of error are all overruled, the order of the court below is affirmed, and this appeal is dismissed at the cost of appellant.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

IN RE: RENE ORDONEZ,

DEPENDENT ADMINISTRATOR,

Relator. '

'

'

'

' No. 08

- 13

- 00294

- CV

AN ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

IN MANDAMUS

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relator

, Rene Ordonez, Dependent Administrator, has filed a petition for writ of

mandamus against the Honorable Linda Chew , Judge of the 327th District Court of El Paso

County, Texas

. Relator asks the Court to issue a writ of mandamus requiring Respondent to set

aside an order which determines that (1) Maria Hernandez, as the mother of two minor children,

has a right to select a legal representative for her children; (2) Hernandez had s elected and hired

the Honorable Christopher Antcliff to prosecute her daughters’ wrongful death claims; and (3)

Relator lacked authority to assert the wrongful death claims of the two children.

To be entitled to mandamus relief, a relator must meet two r equirements. First, the

relator must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion. In re Prudential Insurance

Company of America , 148 S.W.3d 124, 135 (Tex. 2004). Second, the relator must demonstrate

that there is no adequate remedy by appeal. Id . at 136. Based on the record before us, we

conclude that Relator ha s not established he is entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we- 2

-

deny the petition for writ of mandamus and lift the stay order entered on October 23, 2013

. See

T EX .R.A PP .P. 52.8(a).

January 15, 2014

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.

(Rodriguez, J., not participating)
#### CHAPPELL v. STATE.

No. 19941.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 16, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 11, 1939.

L. D. Johnston, of Waxahachie, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

. MORROW, Presiding Judge. .

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area; penalty assessed at a fine of $200.

The State’s witness, W. Y. Mills, an inspector for the Liquor Control Board, testified that about 3:25 o’clock in the afternoon of November 23, 1937, he purchased from the appellant at his house two half pints of “Old Quaker” whisky for the price of $1.25; that after receiving the whisky from the appellant the witness turned it over to the sheriff who produced and identified it upon the trial.

The sheriff of Ellis County testified that he understood that the appellant had been “bootlegging” for quite a while and that he sent the inspector to the appellant for the purpose of buying whisky from him.

Appellant testified as a witness upon the trial and denied that he had sold any whisky to the state's witness Mills, thus presenting a controverted issue for the solution of the jury.

Two bills of exception appear in the record which complain of. certain matters occurring during the trial. However, these bills were not approved by the trial court for the reason (as stated by him) that they did not state the correct facts. As a general rule, bills of exception which have been refused by the trial judge have no place in the record and will not be considered on appeal. When a bill has been rejected for reasons stated by the court, the *1069appellant must prove it up by bystanders as provided by statute, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2237, in order that the matter complained of may be reviewed by the appellate court. In the present instance, this was not done. Therefore, the bills in question cannot be considered by this court.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

After carefully re-examining the record in the light of appellant’s motion for rehearing we are constrained to adhere to the conclusion expressed in the original opinion.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I,Jerry S. Von Rohr, President and Chief Executive Officer of Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filedwith the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: August 14, 2007         By: /s/ Jerry S. Von Rohr     Name: Jerry S. Von Rohr    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit  32.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of Best Energy Services, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities
and  Exchange  Commission  on  the  date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dennis Irwin,
Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002  (18  U.S.C.  1350),  that  to  my  knowledge:

     1.   the Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   the information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

                                   Date:  August  13,  2010

                                   By: \s\ Dennis Irwin
                                       -------------------
                                   Dennis Irwin
                                   Chief  Financial  Officer