alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1



LOGO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements governing the securities listed on Exhibit A, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period 1/1/15 to 12/31/15, (the Reporting Period) and of the Servicers performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of February 2016.



|    |  |                             
|--- |  | ----------------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Blair           
|    |  | Name: Michael Blair         
|    |  | Title: Senior Vice President



---

Exhibit A

Securities Covered in Cenlar FSBs Servicer Compliance Statement 1123:

Redwood Trust, Inc.



|         |  |                                       |  |             |  |                                 |                 | 
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ------------------------------- | --------------- | 
|Investor |  | Issuer                                |  | Security    |  | *PeriodSubserviced byCenlar FSB |                
|H06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-1 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|K06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-2 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|L06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-3 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|Z06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-4 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|Y06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-5 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW0      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-6 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW1      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-1 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW2/S11  |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-2 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW3      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-3 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW4      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-4 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW5      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-5 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW6      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-6 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 | 
|RW7      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-7 |  |                                 | 1/1 to 12/31/15 |
Exhibit 35.3










ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE

UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust
2012-C3

The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas, as the Certificate Administrator (a “Certifying Servicer”) under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, dated
as of September 1, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among, UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor,
Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special
Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian, and Park Bridge
Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor here by certifies in accordance with Section 10.11 of the Agreement:



| | A) | A review of such Certifying Servicer’s activities from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “reporting period”)
and of such Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision and
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | B) | That, as to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its
obligations under the Agreement, in all material respects during the reporting period.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS

as Certificate Administrator



/s/ David Co

BY: David Co

Title: Director

Date: March 1, 2016
EXHIBIT
32.2




STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Karen
Hawkins, principal financial officer of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
Company’s Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 29, 2009
(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/ Karen
      HawkinsKaren Hawkins, Principal Financial
      OfficerDated:
      May 12, 2009
Attachment 3 

Office of Personnel Management 

ACH Credit Instructions 

NACHA 

Record 

Type 

Code 

5 

NACHA 

Field 

3 

NACHA 

Data Element Name 

Company/Agency Name 

Required Information 

(Enter the name of the payor/remitter. If 

you are a federal agency with a Payroll 

Office Number, also enter your PON 

number.) 

5 6 Standard Entry Class Code CCD (or CTX) 

5 9 Effective Entry Date (Enter intended settlement date.) 

6 2 Transaction Code* 22 

6 3 & 4 Receiving DFI Identification (ABA routing #) 051036706 

6 5 DFI Account Number (Enter 12 digit agency account number. 

OPM 2 Credit Gateway/DFI Account 

Number is: 824000002001 ) 

6 6 Amount (Enter payment amount.) 

6 8 Receiving Company/Agency Name (Enter identification information – up to 22 

characters. Please enter “OPM2” (please

make sure to enter “OPM2” and not just

“OPM”, as there are several ALCs 

associated with OPM), AND a brief 

description of the transaction, e.g.; 

“Oct.FY12-2812”, “Premium Ref.”, “RITS 

Sept.10-30”.)

*ACH debits are not permitted to this ABA routing number. All debits received will be automatically returned.
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Online Shipping Holdings
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to her
knowledge:




1.          
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.          
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the
Company.




Date:
      August 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Xue YingName:
              Xue
      YingTitle:
              Chief
      Executive Officer, Secretary and
Director





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL FINANCIAL AND ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Power Medical Interventions, Inc.(the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2008, as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), theundersigned, John P. Gandolfo, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, herebycertifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
|                   | /s/ John P.  Gandolfo                         |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|
|                   | John P. Gandolfo                              |
|                   | Chief Financial  Officer                      |
|                   | (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|                   |                                          |
| November 14, 2008 |                                          |

 

----
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60384

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

HAROLD W. ROBERTS, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:00-CR-14-ALL-LN

--------------------

August 14, 2002

Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Harold W. Roberts, Jr., pleaded guilty to one count of

possession of less than 50 kilograms of marijuana with intent to

distribute, and the district court sentenced him to 120 months in

prison and a five-year term of supervised release. Roberts first

argues that his plea was rendered involuntary by his attorney’s

failure to file a motion to suppress, and he contends that the
No. 01-60384

-2-

district court abused its discretion by denying his FED. R. CRIM.

P. 32(e) motion to withdraw his plea.

Roberts has not shown a “fair and just reason” why he should

be allowed to withdraw his plea. FED. R. CRIM. P. 32(e). Rather,

he argues that counsel should have filed a motion to suppress,

and he speculatively asserts that the charges against him would

have been dismissed had counsel done so. Rule 32 was not meant

“to allow a defendant to make a tactical decision to enter a

plea, wait several weeks, and then obtain a withdrawal if he

believes that he made a bad choice in pleading guilty.” United

States v. Carr, 740 F.2d 339, 345 (5th Cir. 1984). Roberts has

not carried his burden of showing that the district court abused

its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea. See

United States v. Brewster, 137 F.3d 853, 857-58 (5th Cir. 1998). 

Roberts also contends that counsel rendered ineffective

assistance by not filing a motion to suppress. As a general

rule, this court declines to review claims of ineffective

assistance of counsel on direct appeal. United States v. Gibson,

55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995). Roberts has not shown that his

case presents an exception to this general rule. Accordingly, we

decline to consider his claim of ineffective assistance of

counsel. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Sanitized Copy

Sanitized Copy Attachment 2 Chemical Structure
Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 13Case 1:11-cv-00001-CMA-MEH Document 67 Filed 09/27/11 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 13
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, July 11, 2019.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, July 11, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A19D0522. BRANDON SIMS et al. v. FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE 

ASSOCIATION.

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

181407
### UNPUBLISHED



# UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT



#  U NITED S TATES OF A MERICA ,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 00-4671



#  A LBERT G ARY T AYLOR , a/k/a Aldoc00l, Defendant-Appellant. 

# 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge.

(CR-00-127) Submitted: March 16, 2001 Decided: March 27, 2001 Before WIDENER, NIEMEYER, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

COUNSELThomas C. Carter, CARTER & KRAMER, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Helen F. Fahey, United States Attorney, Michael E. Rich, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

OPINION
PER CURIAM:Albert Gary Taylor was convicted by a jury on one count of traveling interstate to engage in sexual relations with a juvenile, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) (1994), and two counts of using a facility of interstate commerce to entice a juvenile to engage in sexual activityfor which any person can be charged with a criminal offense, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) (1994). He was sentenced to seventy-one months imprisonment. We affirm. On appeal, Taylor challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the convictions on all three counts. Specifically, with respect to the first count, Taylor maintains that the jury improperly rejected his entrapment defense. As to the remaining two counts, Taylor argues that he did not know and could not have known the age of thegirls in question, and therefore the evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the convictions. This Court reviews a jury verdict for sufficiency of the evidence by determining whether there is substantial evidence, when viewed in a light most favorable to the Government, to support the verdict. Glasser v. United States , 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942). In evaluating the sufficiency of the evidence, this Court does not review the credibility of the witnesses and assumes that the jury resolved all contradictions in the testimony in favor of the government. United States v. Romer , 148 F.3d 359, 364 (4th Cir. 1998), cert. denied , 525 U.S. 1141 (1999). We have reviewed the briefs and materials submitted in the joint appendix and find sufficient evidence to support the convictions. Wefurther reject Taylor’s claims on appeal. Accordingly, we affirm Taylor’s convictions and sentence. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 2 U NITED S TATES v. T AYLORmaterials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3 U NITED S TATES v. T AYLOR
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Steven Darak, Chief Financial Officer of Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc., manager of IMHSecured Loan Fund, LLC, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 of IMHSecured Loan Fund, LLC; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: August 14, 2007 /s/ Steven Darak   Steven Darak   Chief Financial Officer, Investors MortgageHoldings, Inc., manager of IMH Secured Loan
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2862 

To authorize the amendment of the Federal sentencing guidelines to provide 

for an increase in 2 levels if the defendant intentionally selected any 

victim or any property as the object of the offense of conviction because 

of the victim’s military service or status as a veteran. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2015 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida (for himself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. WALZ, Mr. BRADY

of Pennsylvania, and Mr. RIGELL) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To authorize the amendment of the Federal sentencing 

guidelines to provide for an increase in 2 levels if the 

defendant intentionally selected any victim or any property as the object of the offense of conviction because 

of the victim’s military service or status as a veteran. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Protection 

5 Enhancement Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2862 IH

1 SEC. 2. DUTIES OF FEDERAL SENTENCING COMMISSION. 

2 Pursuant to its authority under section 994 of title 

3 28, United States Code, the United States Sentencing 

4 Commission shall, if appropriate, amend the Federal sen5 tencing guidelines to provide for an increase in 2 levels 

6 if the defendant intentionally selected any victim or any 

7 property as the object of the offense of conviction because 

8 of the victim’s military service or status as a veteran. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23268]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Designation of performance review board chair.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice provides the Performance Review Board Chair 
designee for the Department of Energy. This listing supersedes all 
previously published lists of Performance Review Board Chair.

DATES: This appointment is effective as of October 3, 2024.

Dennis M. Miotla (Primary)
Terri E. Lee (Alternate)

Signing Authority

    This document of the Department of Energy was signed on October 3, 
2024, by Farhana Hossain, Director of the Office of Corporate Executive 
Management within the Office of the Chief Human Capital Officer, 
pursuant to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That 
document with the original signature and date is maintained by DOE. For 
administrative purposes only, and in compliance with requirements of 
the Office of the Federal Register, the undersigned DOE Federal 
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the 
document in electronic format for publication as an official document 
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way 
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the 
Federal Register.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on October 3, 2024.
Jennifer Hartzell,
Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23268 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 9, 2015

Order 

September 9, 2015

149494(68)

MAKENZIE GREER, a Minor, KENNETH 

GREER, Individually and as Conservator, and 

ELIZABETH GREER,

Plaintiffs-Appellees/

Cross-Appellants,

v

ADVANTAGE HEALTH and ANITA R. AVERY, 

M.D.,

Defendants-Appellants/

Cross-Appellees,

and

TRINITY HEALTH MICHIGAN, d/b/a ST. 

MARY’S HOSPITAL and KRISTINA MIXER, 

M.D.,

Defendants.

SC: 149494

COA: 312655

Kent CC: 10-009033-NH

________________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of the Michigan Association for Justice 

for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on 

August 28, 2015, is accepted for filing.