alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.B** **CERTIFICATION**     I, John R. Sult, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on    Form 10-Q    of Colorado Interstate Gas Company;     2. Based on my knowledge, this Report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this Report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this Report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this Report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this Report is    being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this Report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this Report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this Report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting.     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.  Date:    August 7, 2007    */s/ John R. Sult*    John R. Sult    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer    and Controller    (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)    Colorado Interstate Gas Company
PNA GROUP, INC.



Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of PNA Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, the undersigned, each certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  |                                                             
|------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | PNA Group, Inc.                                             
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ Maurice S. Nelson, Jr.
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | Maurice S. Nelson, Jr. Chief Executive Officer and
President
|                    |  |  | 
|Dated: May 15, 2008 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ William S. Johnson    
|                    |  |  |  |     |  |                            |  | William S. Johnson Chief Financial
Officer
Exhibit 15.1

















CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form F-3 (file No. 333-193503), the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (file No. 333-207654) and the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (file No. 333-188286) of RedHill Biopharma Ltd. of our report dated February 24, 2016, relating to the financial
statements which appears in this Form 20-F.















|Tel-Aviv, Israel  | /s/ Kesselman & Kesselman                                   
|----------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------
|February 25, 2016 | Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)                         
|                  | A member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopersInternational Limited



























|                                                                                                                                                                              
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Kesselman & Kesselman, Trade Tower, 25 Hamered Street, Tel-Aviv 68125, Israel,

P.O Box 50005 Tel-Aviv 61500
Telephone: +972 -3- 7954555, Fax:+972 -3- 7954556, www.pwc.com/il
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Geovic Mining Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John E. Sherborne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |     |  |                                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | --- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Date: August 6, 2010 |  |  |  | By: |  | /s/ John E. Sherborne                    
|                     |  |  |  |     |  | John E. Sherborne Chief
Executive Officer
#### EVANS v. STATE.

No. 19118.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 9, 1937.

J. G. Anderson, of Fairfield, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, 'State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Unlawfully tapping a pipe line is the offense ; penalty assessed 'at confinement in the penitentiary for One year. '

The' ’ indictment appears f¿guiar. The record is before this court without/ statement of facts or bills of' excfplJpjj. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the *offense*charged’afid Waived-a :jury:upon1 the trial of the case. No matter has been presented1 justifying. djscjissiQg .or .¡warranting re-versal of the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed..
REPORT ON SSESSMENT OF COMPLI NCE WITH PPLIC BLE SECURITIES ND EXCH NGE COMMISSION'S REGUL TION BSERVICING CRITERIA
 For the calendar year ending December 31, 2012, National Tax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.(the "Servicer").
 National
Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible for assessing compliance as of
December 31, 2012 and for the period from Janu ary 1, 2012 through
December 31, 2012 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria
set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal
Regulations (the "CFR"). NTS has used the servicing criteria
communicated to NTS by the Servicer to as sess compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria. Only servicing criteria 1122 (d)
(l)(ii), 1122 (d)1(iv ), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122 (d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi),
1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the " pplicable
Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performs
with respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has
determine d that the remaining servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122 (d) of the SEC Regulation AB are not applicable to the
activities it performs with respect to the tran sactions covered
by this report. The transactions covered by this report include all tax
payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system (the "Platform Transactions").
 NTS,
as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the NTS
has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing
Criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform Transactions taken as a whole.
 Plante
& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered public accounting firm,
has issued an attestation report on the assessment of compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2012 and for
the Reporting Period as set forth in this assertion.
 National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer
 /s/ Lori D. Eshoo
 Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), Ronald A. Rittenmeyer, Chief Executive Officer of NCO Group, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”) that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date:  | May 13,   2011       |   | /s/   Ronald A. Rittenmeyer |
|--------|---------------------------|--------|-----------------------------|
|   | Ronald   A. Rittenmeyer   |
|   | Chief   Executive Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

JERIAH WOODY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1559

[August 10, 2017]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles Burton, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 502010CF001246A.

Jeriah Woody, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

MAY, FORST and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 7471** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. TYRELL KEONI SAUNDERS, a/k/a Rico, a/k/a Little Red , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Danville
. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. ( 4:12

- cr - 00032

- JLK

- 1; 4:14

- cv - 80771

- JLK

- RSB )

Submitted : January 28, 2016 Decided: February 4, 2016

Before NIE MEYER and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Tyrell Keoni Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Day Rottenborn, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Donald Ray Wolthuis, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Tyrell Keoni Saunders seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The ord er is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S. C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. S lack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and th at the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Saunders has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of ap pealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We have issued our report dated March 28, 2007, accompanying the consolidated
financial statements and schedule included in the Annual Report of O. I.
Corporation on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. We hereby consent
to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration Statements
of O. I. Corporation on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-24505, effective October 3, 1988,
File No. 33-62209, effective December 20, 1988, File No. 33-66822, effective
August 2, 1993 and File No. 333-106254, effective June 18, 2003).

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Houston, Texas
March 28, 2007
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460


## NOV - 4 2011
OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION The Honorable Rick Berg U.S. House ofRepresentatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Dear Congressman Berg: Thank you for your letter ofOctober 6, 2011, co-signed by two ofyour colleagues, addressed to AdministratorLisa Jackson in which you request that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency respect the technicaljudgmentofNorthDakota as the state pennitting authority and accept the state's State Implementation Plan (SIP) tor regional haze. We acknowledge the importance ofthe issues related to several coal-fired power plants in North Dakota and agree that states have primary responsibility to develop regional haze SIPs. However, the Clean Air Act (CAA) clearly requires the EPA to review the adequacy ofthe regional haze SIPs and requires the EPA to take action to correct any deficiencies in the SIP where the EPA has disapproved all orpart ofa SIP. See CAA sections IIO(k) and (c). In our September21,2011 proposal, we agreed with many ofNorth Dakota's decisions regarding CAArequired Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART)

- emission controls for certain types ofolder industrial facilities emitting airpollutantsthat reduce visibility. However, because North Dakota's analyses ofcontrols for some ofthe sources subjectto BART, and ofcontrols on othersources that could help provide reasonable progress towards visibility goals, are not merely different from our own, but appear to be significantly flawed, we proposed disapproval ofthose parts ofthe SIP and proposed a Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) to ensure that air pollution improvements continue. Specifically, we disagree with North Dakota's conclusionsthat selective catalytic reduction (SCR) to reduce nitrogen oxide emissions from facilities in North Dakota is technically infeasible. We also found that North Dakotahas substantially over-estimated costs and based some control level conclusions on modeling techniques which substantially understate visibility improvements. Nonetheless, ourproposal notes that should we finalize our FIP as proposed, the affected facilities and/or the state may request reconsideration ofour final action based on the potential outcomes ofany field testing ofSCRfeasibility they may choose to undertake prior to the date the emission limits in our FIP become effectivc. We thank you for testifying at the public hearing held on October 14, 201 1. We welcome public commentson ourproposal until November 21,2011. We intend to carefullyconsiderthese comments as we make a final decision. Ourcurrent schedule, which is court-ordered, requires us to make a final decision on ourproposal no later than February 9, 2012.

Inlerne! Address (URL) • http IIwww.epa gOY Recycled/Recyclable' Printed With Vegetable 0,1 Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer. Process Chlorine Free Recycled PaperAgain, thank you for your letter. Ifyou have further questions, please contact me oryour staffmay call Josh Lewis in EPA's Office ofCongressional and Intergovernmental Relations at (202)564-2095. Sincerely,

inaMcCarthy Assistant Administrator
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
     /s/ H. David Ramm
 /s/ John D. Giolli
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3443 

To prohibit the provision of funds under title X of the Public Health Service 

Act to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., or its affiliates, 

subsidiaries, successors, or clinics during a period of review by the 

Government Accountability Office and the Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Mrs. ELLMERS of North Carolina introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit the provision of funds under title X of the 

Public Health Service Act to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., or its affiliates, subsidiaries, 

successors, or clinics during a period of review by the 

Government Accountability Office and the Congress. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Women’s Health Ac5 countability Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3443 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT 

2 TITLE X FUNDING TO PLANNED PARENT3 HOOD UNTIL CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF 

4 GAO EVALUATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—No Federal funds may be made 

6 available pursuant to a grant or contract under title X 

7 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 300 et seq.) 

8 to Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc., or 

9 any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, or clinics 

10 until the date on which Congress completes a review of 

11 the report under subsection (b). 

12 (b) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW OF GAO EVALUATION

13 ON PLANNED PARENTHOOD ACTIVITIES.— 

14 (1) GAO REPORT.—Not later than 2 years 

15 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comp16 troller General of the United States shall submit to 

17 Congress a report containing an evaluation of all 

18 medical items and services being offered in the facili19 ties of Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 

20 Inc., and of its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, or 

21 clinics. 

22 (2) CONGRESSIONAL REVIEW.—Not later than 

23 the date that is three months after the date of re24 ceipt of the report under paragraph (1), Congress 

25 shall complete a review of such report. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | (1)    | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));      and   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| /s/      RICHARD JENKINS     |   | September  7      , 2010 |
|------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Date                               |
| Chief      Executive Officer |   |                               |
|                         |   |                               |

----