alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WEBB v. NATIONAL STANDARD FIRE INS. CO.

No. 2886.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Feb. 6, 1936.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 19, 1936.

E. E. Easterling and Leroy McCall, both of Beaumont, for appellant.

Peak & Rowland, of Houston, and Son-field, Sonfield & Murphy, of Beaumont, for appellee.

O’QUINN, Justice.

Appellant appeals from an instructed verdict and consequent judgment against him in an action of trespass to try title rendered by the Fifty-eighth district court of Jefferson county. There was no exception to the judgment nor notice of appeal. In this state of the record, we are without jurisdiction to review the judgment, and the appeal is accordingly dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350,
Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), we, Daniel J. Churay, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas C. Stabley, Chief Financial Officer of Rex Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to
our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: May 4, 2011

|                                      |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|                                      |  | 
|/s/ Daniel J. Churay                  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas C. Stabley  
|Daniel J. Churay                      |  |  |  | Thomas C. Stabley      
|President and Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is
being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rex Energy Corporation and
will be retained by Rex Energy Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
2015 FEDERAL BENEFITS

OPEN SEASON

Monday Nov. 9 through Monday Dec.14

FEHB Health

• Enroll

• Change plan/option

• Cancel enrollment

• Self/Self + One/Self & Family Flexible Spending Accounts

•Enroll

• Reenroll (it’s not automatic!)

•Increase/decrease your election

with a new enrollment

FEDVIP Dental & Vision

• Enroll

• Change plan/option

• Cancel enrollment

• Self/Self + One/Self & Family

MORE INFO: www.opm.gov/openseason

ENROLL/CHANGE/CANCEL:

FEHB HEALTH: Use your agency's online enrollment system or contact your human resources office.

FEDVIP DENTAL AND/OR VISION: www.BENEFEDS.com or 1-877-888-3337

FSAFEDS FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT: www.FSAFEDS.com or 1-877-372-3337

• Myfamily’shealth,dental,andvisionneedsfor 2016

• Whethermycurrentplanwillbe availablein2016

• Howmycurrentplan’sbenefits andpremiums change in 2016

-IfI donothing,FEHBandFEDVIPenrollmentsrolloverautomatically

• Whetherthe online comparisontoolsshowa betterplanforme

• HowmuchmoneyI couldsavewitha flexible spending account

ThingstoConsider:

gg

U. S . O F F I C E O F P E R S O N N E L M A N AG E M E N T
2015 FEDERAL BENEFITS

OPEN SEASON

Monday Nov. 9 through Monday Dec. 14

Things toConsider:

• My family’s health, dental, and vision needsfor 2016

• Whethermy current planwill be available in 2016

• Howmy current plan’s benefits and premiums change in 2016

-IfI do nothing, FEHBand FEDVIPenrollmentsrollover automatically

• Whetherthe online comparison toolsshowa better plan forme

• Howmuchmoney I could savewith a flexible spending account

MORE INFO: www.opm.gov/openseason

ENROLL/CHANGE/CANCEL:

FFEHB HEALTH: Use your agency's online enrollment system or contact your human resources office.

FEDVIP DENTAL AND/OR VISION: www.BENEFEDS.com or 1-877-888-3337 

FSAFEDS FLEXIBLE SPENDING ACCOUNT: www.FSAFEDS.comor 1-877-372-3337

U. S . O F F I C E O F P E R S O N N E L M A N A G E M E N T

FEHB Health

• Enroll

• Change plan/option

• Cancel enrollment

• Self/Self + One/Self & Family

Flexible Spending Accounts

• Enroll

• Reenroll (it’s not automatic!)

• Increase/decrease your election

with a new enrollment

FEDVIP Dental & Vision

• Enroll

• Change plan/option

• Cancel enrollment

• Self/Self + One/Self & Family
Federal Benefits Open Season

Health Dental/Vision Flexible Spending Accounts

Enroll Make Changes Cancel Renew FSA

www.opm.gov/openseason

HAPPENING NOW!
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000017122-APR-201310:15 AM
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3199 

To prohibit statutory sanctions relief by the United States with respect 

to Iran unless the Senate provides its advice and consent to ratification 

of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2015 

Mr. BRAT (for himself, Mr. GROTHMAN, Mr. MESSER, and Mr. PALMER) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit statutory sanctions relief by the United States 

with respect to Iran unless the Senate provides its advice 

and consent to ratification of the Joint Comprehensive 

Plan of Action. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3199 IH

1 SECTION 1. PROHIBITION ON STATUTORY SANCTIONS RE2 LIEF BY THE UNITED STATES WITH RESPECT 

3 TO IRAN UNLESS THE SENATE PROVIDES ITS 

4 ADVICE AND CONSENT TO RATIFICATION OF 

5 THE JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF AC6 TION. 

7 (a) PROHIBITION.—Notwithstanding section 135 of 

8 the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2160e), as 

9 added by section 2 of the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review 

10 Act of 2015 (Public Law 114–17; 129 Stat. 201), or any 

11 other provision of law, action involving any measure of 

12 statutory sanctions relief by the United States may not 

13 be taken unless the Senate provides its advice and consent 

14 to ratification of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action 

15 under article II, section 2 of the United States Constitu16 tion. 

17 (b) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

18 (1) ACTION INVOLVING ANY MEASURE OF STAT19 UTORY SANCTIONS RELIEF BY THE UNITED

20 STATES.—The term ‘‘action involving any measure 

21 of statutory sanctions relief by the United States’’ 

22 has the meaning given the term in section 135(c)(3) 

23 of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 

24 2160e(c)(3)). 

25 (2) JOINT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF ACTION.— 

26 The term ‘‘Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action’’ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3199 IH

1 means the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, 

2 signed at Vienna July 14, 2015, by Iran and by the 

3 People’s Republic of China, France, Germany, the 

4 Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the 

5 United States, with the High Representative of the 

6 European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security 

7 Policy, and all implementing materials and agree8 ments related to the Joint Comprehensive Plan of 

9 Action. 

10 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—This section takes effect on 

11 the date of the enactment of this Act and applies with 

12 respect to action involving any measure of statutory sanc13 tions relief by the United States provided before, on, or 

14 after such date of enactment. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2  CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Ark Developments INC., a Colorado corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), Noah Clark, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer of the Company do hereby certify, pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003 (18 U.S.C.  1350), that to their knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Noah Clark Noah Clark, President and Chief Executive Officer Secretary/Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer   July 16, 2008  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Capital Resource Alliance Inc. and will be retained by Capital Resource Alliance Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3447 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3447 EH

1 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

3 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

4 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En5 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12642, the 

6 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

7 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

8 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest require9 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

10 under that section, extend the time period during which 

11 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

12 the project for up to three consecutive 2-year periods from 

13 the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued 

14 by the Commission. 

15 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

16 period required for commencement of construction of the 

17 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission shall 

19 reinstate the license effective as of the date of its expira-
3 

•HR 3447 EH

1 tion and the first extension authorized under subsection 

2 (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 15, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3447 

AN ACT 

To extend the deadline for commencement of 

construction of a hydroelectric project.
#### FARMERS’ & MERCHANTS’ LUMBER CO. v. FIDELITY UNION CASUALTY CO.

Motion No. 2085.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Jan. 7, 1932.

J. M. Moore, of Cleburne, for appellant.

Collins & Houston, of Dallas, for appellee.

BARCUS, J.

On May 25,1931, the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Lumber Company recovered a judgment in the county court of Johnson county against Fannie L. Hanks Feller, guardian, and the surety on her guardian bond, Fidelity Union Casualty Company. On July 13th the Fidelity Union Casualty Company filed its super-sedeas appeal bond. On October 2, 1931, the Fidelity Union Casualty Company presented to the clerk of this court a transcript of the record, and requested same to be filed, which being refused, the said Fidelity Union Casualty Company filed its motion asking this court to grant it permission to have said transcript of the record filed. On October 29, 1931, this court overruled and denied said motion on the ground that same was tendered too late, holding that the time in which the record could have been filed on appeal expired, as a matter of law, about September 20th. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ Lumber Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 43 S.W.(2d) 147.

On December 5, 1931, the Farmers’ & Merchants’ Lumber Company tendered to the clerk of this court a certificate with motion attached, asking this court to affirm the judgment of the trial court on certificate. The clerk refused to file said motion. The Farmers’ & Merchants’ Lumber Company have now filed its motion asking that the court require the clerk of this court to file its motion to affirm the judgment of the trial court on certificate. Since this court has held the time for filing the record in this cause on appeal by the surety company expired on September 20, 1931, the term to *755which said appeal was returnable expired on the first Monday in October, 1931.

The rule seems to be well settled that the appellee or defendant in error cannot have the judgment of the trial court affirmed on certificate, unless a motion therefor is filed before the expiration of the term to which the appeal or writ of error was returnable. Lumbermen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. James (Tex. Civ. App.) 35 S.W.(2d) 458, and authorities there cited; Ross v. Cantrell (Tex. Civ. App.) 278 S. W. 927; Herndon v. Ridley (Tex. Civ. App.) 297 S. W. 309. Said motion, having been tendered for filing on December 5, 1931, long after the expiration of the term to which the appeal was returnable, came too late.

The motion is in, all things overruled.
(logo) Torchlight

 

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

CERTIFICATION WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C7, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C7 (the “Trust”)

I, Jacob Baron, on behalf of Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as special servicer (the “Certifying Servicer”), certify to RBS Commercial Funding Inc., the Depositor, and its officers, directors and affiliates, and with the knowledge and intent that they will rely upon this certification, that:

1.                    I (or Servicing Officers under my supervision) have reviewed the Certifying Servicer’s activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and the Certifying Servicer’s performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement; and

2.                    To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.  

 

Date:        March 11, 2015

TORCHLIGHT LOAN SERVICES, LLC

By: /s/ Jacob BaronName: Jacob Baron Title:   Authorized Signatory

 

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10017

T 212.883.2800  F 212.883.2560

E info@torchlightloanservices.com

   www.torchlightinvestors.com
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Justice
 On September 27, 2024, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio in the lawsuit entitled 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Lima Refining Company,*
                     Civil Action No. 3:24-cv-01659. The Complaint alleges that Defendant violated the National Air Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for benzene waste operations, the New Source Performance Standards for VOC emissions from refinery wastewater systems, the general requirement to use good air pollution control practices, and its Title V permit, at its refinery in Lima, Ohio. The proposed Consent Decree resolves these claims and requires the Defendant to perform injunctive relief, including the installation of a flash column. Defendant will also conduct enhanced monitoring and repairs and install six air monitoring stations in the surrounding community and post the data publicly. Defendant will pay a civil penalty of $19 million.
                    ( print page 80934) The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on the Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division, and should refer to 
                    *United States*
                     v. 
                    *Lima Refining Company,*
                     D.J. Ref. No. 90-5-2-1-12782. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty (30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be submitted either by email or by mail: *To submit comments:*
*Send them to:*By email
*pubcomment-ees.enrd@usdoj.gov.*By mail
Assistant Attorney General, U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. Box 7611, Washington, DC 20044-7611.
 During the public comment period, the Consent Decree may be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: 
                    *https://www.justice.gov/​enrd/​consent-decrees.*
                     If you require assistance accessing the Consent Decree you may request assistance by email or by mail to the addresses provided above for submitting comments. Susan M. Akers, Deputy Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment and Natural Resources Division.


[FR Doc. 2024-22988 Filed 10-3-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4410-15-P
| 1.   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and the consolidated result of operations of the Company for the periods presented. |
|----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/Marian Munz                                                        |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Name:  | Marian Munz                                                           |
| Title: | Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director |
| Date:  | August 19, 2009                                                       |
#### CAMERON et al. v. C. I. T. CORPORATION et al.

No. 12825.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Feb. 24, 1937.

Cameron & Hardin and Kennedy Smith, all of Edinburg, for appellants.

Russell & Beaucaire, of San Antonio, for appellees.

SLATTON, Justice.

Appellees filed a motion in this court on the 10th day of February, 1937, together with a supporting certificate, praying that this cause be affirmed on certificate.

It appears that on the 20th day of November, 1936, judgment was rendered in the Ninety-Second district court of Hidal-go county, Tex., and that on the same date notice of appeal was given, and on the 10th day of December, 1936, the appeal bond was approved by the clerk of said court. It is further shown by the record that no transcript has been timely filed in this court. By answer, Ollie M. Cameron, joined pro forma by her husband, A. W. Cameron, shows that on February 16, 1937, she filed with the clerk of the district court of Hidalgo county, Tex., her petition for a writ of error.

Article 1839, as amended by Acts 1931, 42d Leg. p. 100, c. 66, and Acts 1933, 43d Leg. p. 142, c. 67 (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 1839), provides: “In appeal or Writ of Error the Appellant or plaintiff in error shall file the transcript with the Clerk of the Court of Civil Appeals within sixty days from the final judgment or order overruling motion for new trial, or service of the writ of error; provided, by motion filed before, at, or within a reasonable time, not exceeding fifteen days, after the expiration of such sixty day period, showing good cause to have existed within such sixty day period, why said transcript could not be so filed, the Court of Civil Appeals may permit the same to be thereafter filed upon such terms as it shall prescribe.”

The judgment having been entered on the 20th day of November, A. D. 1936, and more than 60 days having elapsed since the date of rendition of such judgment, and without an application showing good cause having been filed and the filing of the appeal bond, the right of affirmance on certificate becomes absolute. Jarrell et al. v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ State Bank (Tex.Sup.) 99 S.W.(2d) 281. All conflicting decisions of our Courts of Civil Appeals have been settled that the motion to affirm on certificate in this case is absolute.

Appellants, by their answer to ap-pellees’ motion to affirm on certificate, show that they have sued out a writ of error in the trial court on February 16, 1937. This action does not militate against the right of appellees for their affirmance on certificate. Moreover, it shows that appellants have completely abandoned their appeal.

Accordingly, under the rule announced by our Supreme Court in the Jarrell Case, supra, appellees are entitled to an affirmance on certificate, and it is so ordered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 351 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-686, CP2024-695.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22628 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P