alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### MAY 1 4 2008 

## Avenal Power Center,LLC 500 Dallas Street,Level 31 Air D., "iM-

## -3 u.s.**EPA~** fii:GlON 9 

## Houston, TX 77002

May 12, 2008

Mr. Gerardo Rios Chief, Permits Office 

## u.s. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, California 94105-3901

Re: Avenal Power Center, LLC

- Avenal Energy Request for Consultation Under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act

Dear Mr. Rios:

Thep-urpose ofthis letter is to request that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 9 initiate formal consultation under Section 7 ofthe Endangered Species Act (ESA) with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) pursuant to the anticipated approval ofone ormorepermits to be issued byEPA under the Clean Air Act (CAA) for the proposed construction and operation ofAvenal Energy (the "Project") in the City ofAvenal, Kings County, California. Avenal Power Center, LLC (APC) is proceeding under the assumption that consultation is required under Section 7(a) ofthe ESA given that: 1) APC has submitted an application for a Prevention ofSignificant Deterioration (PSD) Permit for the Project, thus providingthe federal nexus; and 2) the preliminary conclusionbyUSFWS staffis that the Projectmay affect the San Joaquin Kit Fox (SJKF), which is listed as endangered llnder ESA.

To facilitate consultation with USFWS, two copies ofa Consultation Initiation Package are enclosed to serve as the basis for EPA'sreview and for the USFWS preparation ofa Biological Opinion or a finding that the Project canbe covered by an existing Biological Opinion issued to the Kern Water Bank. The Consultation Initiation Package COI1Sists of relevant sections ofthe Project's California Energy Comnlission (CEC) Application for Certification (AFC) including the Project Description, the Biological ReSOllrces chapter, and the related Appendices (biological resource technical studies).

The Project consists ofa 600 MW combined-cycle electric power generatingplant and ancillary facilities. It will be located on a portion ofan approximately 148-acre site (the "Site") located on land zoned for industrial use. The Site is located in the agricultural region ofthe southwestern San Joaquil1 Valley. While the Site is within the citylimits, it is separated from the residential and comnlercial districts ofthe Citybythe interviewing topography of the Kettleman Hills and by a distance ofabout 6 miles. The Project design incorporates
**Exhibit 31.1**I, Joseph A. Mills., certify that:   1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.;   2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the year covered by this annual report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the yearspresented in this annual report;   4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the year in which this annual report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this annual report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the yearcovered by this annual report; and  c. disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and   5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: July 26, 2007                                                          /s/ Joseph A. Mills   Joseph A. Mills   Chairman and Chief Executive Officerof Eagle RockEnergy G&P, LLC, General Partner of Eagle RockEnergy GP, L.P., General Partner of Eagle RockEnergy Partners, L.P.
SHARE

# Transformational Decarbonization Initiative 

                  -  Clean Energy 

                            -  View a hi-res version of this image   
                            -  View a hi-res version of this image  SPRUCE is a large-scale experiment to assess the response of northern peatland ecosystems to increases in temperature and exposures to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. 
                            -  View a hi-res version of this image   
                            -  View a hi-res version of this image   

                            -  View a hi-res version of this image   
                            -  View a hi-res version of this image  SPRUCE is a large-scale experiment to assess the response of northern peatland ecosystems to increases in temperature and exposures to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations. 
                            -  View a hi-res version of this image   
                            -  View a hi-res version of this image   

The Transformational Decarbonization Initiative (TDI) supports science and technology solutions to address the critical challenge of decarbonizing the nation’s energy system to address climate change. 

TDI is guided by the knowledge that for projects to be relevant to climate change, they must be at a very broad scale enabled by interdisciplinary science. The Initiative brings together the world-leading capabilities of ORNL and the multidisciplinary expertise of its scientists and engineers to develop and deploy breakthroughs in carbon capture, conversion and utilization, and storage to support the nation’s goal of net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

TDI enables cross-cutting projects from fundamental science to scale-up technologies in the following areas:
                          - Direct-air and point-source carbon capture
                          - Innovative materials and processes for hard-to-decarbonize sectors
                          - Bio-inspired approaches and natural sinks
                          - Combining electrochemical, thermomechanical, photochemical processes, and other solutions for cost-effective decarbonization at a national scale

TDI projects build on a rich history of decarbonization breakthroughs at ORNL, including CO2 capture and conversion and technology solutions across the nation’s most energy-intensive sectors. 

TDI sits in the Energy Science and Technology Directorate, where researchers deliver breakthroughs in energy from generation to distribution and storage to end use in support of Department of Energy missions. Within ESTD, TDI is focused on helping decarbonize the power grid, transportation, buildings, and manufacturing sectors. The work is enabled by a unique regional innovation ecosystem that leverages academic and industrial collaboration and the deployment of technologies with real-world impact.
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350,**

**as Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection withthe quarterly report of Power Medical Interventions, Inc. (the “***Company***”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “***Report***”),I, Brian M. Posner, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

1.                                       the Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Date: May 14, 2009

 
|   | /s/ BRIAN M. POSNER        |
|--------|----------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   | Brian M. Posner            |
|   | *Chief  Financial Officer* |

 

----
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Payroll Office Letter

Number: P-00-35 Date: December 4, 2000

SUBJECT: THE MODERNIZING TODAY NOVEMBER 2000 ISSUE - WEB BASED

SERVICES

Enclosed is the Modernizing Today issue for November 2000. This issue provides

you with an insightful look at our past, present and future. In addition, there are

several featured articles including -

 Information on the Federal Human Resources Data Network (HRDN)

 An Interview with Bill Smith of NARFE, and

 Information on the new Benefits Offices Resource Center and the Fall Festival

of Training

If you should have any questions or comments regarding this bulletin or on the

Modernization effort, please email us at: askrsm@opm.gov or fax us at 202-606-

0548. If you wish to see previous issues of the bulletin or read more about the

Modernization effort, you can visit our web site at www.opm.gov/retire/modern.

And if you should have any questions about this or any other payroll office letter,

please call us at 202-606-0606, or send an email to finance@opm.gov. 

 Robert A. Yuran, Chief

 Financial Policy Staff

 Retirement and Insurance Service

Enclosure
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Ian McBean, President, Secretary and Treasurer
of Auror Capital Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Auror Capital Corp.
      for the period ended July 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Auror Capital Corp.                                                                

Dated: September 17, 2009

/s/ Ian McBeanIan McBeanPresident, Secretary
and Treasurer(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Auror Capital
Corp. and will be retained by Auror Capital Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION****PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**I, Jerry S. Von Rohr, President and Chief Executive Officer of Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the“Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted by Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:(1) The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2007 asfiled with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 14, 2007         By:
NASA thanks EPA for the opportunity to review and p rovide comment on the draft Dioxin Response to

the NAS. Upon reading the document we understand th at this draft Response to the NAS contains the IRIS draft risk assessment and our comments represe nt the interagency review step in the IRIS process. Our comments target general issues with the draft, as written.

• The draft is extremely long, complex, and very diff icult to follow. This draft Dioxin risk assessment totals over 1900 pages (including over 1 300 pages in Appendices) with significant discussion of assumptions and conclusions in the Ap pendices and not the main document. The length and organization of this draft undercut EPA’ s stated goal of transparency and clarity. This

issue has been noted in several recent draft EPA ri sk assessments that the voluminous, densely written discussion of scientific studies actually p revents the reader, including members of the general public, from readily understanding EPA’s ch oice and application of scientific

information.

• Review of this draft was hampered by the size and c omplexity of the draft risk assessment and the limited time for technical interagency review. A to tal of 5 weeks of review time, including a delayed receipt of the charge questions to only 2 w eeks before the end of the comment period, was not adequate for sound, defensible review. This late receipt of the draft Change Questions is inconsistent with the established IRIS interagency process, by which Agencies receive both the draft risk assessment and the Charge Questions at t he initiation of the review comment period.

• The draft Charge Questions need to be expanded to a nswer several basic outstanding questions:

o Did EPA address the NAS recommendations, not just t he more limited set of questions targeted by EPA? What, if any, outstanding scientif ic issues remain?

o Did EPA consistently apply its current policies and guidance in the cancer determination, Mode of Action, and linear response, and the choice s of critical studies?

o Did EPA err in the application of alternative appro aches or new techniques to this controversial risk assessment? Was the justificatio n of use of alternative approaches or new techniques consistent with current scientific t hinking?

NASA thanks EPA for this opportunity to participate in the IRIS interagency review process.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  Form 10-Q
  James
C. Yardley
# CE2004065EN.01012701.xml

| 13.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 65/127 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 65/127

---

(2004/C 65 E/141)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2288/03

by Ozan Ceyhun (PSE) to the Commission

(11 July 2003)

Subject:   Treatment of third-country nationals in prisons in the EU Member States

Subject:

The Turkish daily newspaper Hürriyet carried an article drawing attention to restrictions on the rights of third-country nationals held in prisons in the EU.

Those restrictions concerned the right to visits, to make complaints and to day release.

To what extent is the Commission aware of these problems? What areas are affected by these restrictions? What is the legal basis for their imposition? Are these restrictions being dealt with as part of the process of approximating home affairs policies, or will they continue to differ from Member State to Member State?

Answer given by Mr Vitorino on behalf of the Commission

(18 September 2003)

(18 September 2003)

The Commission does not have a copy of the article to which the Honourable Member refers and so it is unable to reply in detail to the questions, which are based on information contained in that article. Matters relating to the way in which penalties (including those affecting conditional release) are enforced will be the subject of a Green Paper (on the approximation, recognition and enforcement of criminal penalties in the Union) that will probably be adopted by the Commission in October. As things stand, the right of appeal of detainees is not governed by any specific rules of Union legislation and is essentially covered by the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, concluded under the auspices of the Council of Europe (Article 6), and by the Member States' national law.

---