alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 03-3530

___________ Alan R. Vaughn, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the City of North Branch, Minnesota; * District of Minnesota. Richard Anderson; Julie Dresel; Patrick * Trudgeon; Thomas Miller; Ellis * [UNPUBLISHED] Johnson; Rodney Lofquist; Steven * Vanden Heuvel; Donald White; John * Philipson; Kevin Engel; Gregory * Strom; James Reuter; John Moosey; * State of Minnesota; Dennis Gustafson; * Alfred S. Alliegro; U.S. Attorney * General, * * Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: July 7, 2004 Filed: July 27, 2004

___________ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.1 The Honorable Michael J. Davis, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota. -2- Alan R. Vaughn appeals from the district court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion and his request for appointment of a special prosecutor, and from the district court’s imposition of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c) sanctions. Vaughn has also filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, claiming the district court denied him his right to a jury trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record, we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Rule 60(b) relief. Even setting aside the issue of the timeliness of the motion, Vaughn merely reasserted his entitlement to relief as stated in his earlier pleadings and did not demonstrate fraud, exceptional circumstances, or the presence of newly discovered evidence. See Arnold v. Wood , 238 F.3d 992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (standard of review). The district court also properly denied Vaughn’s request to appoint the United States Attorney General as a special prosecutor to investigate several of the named defendants. See Nat’l Milk Producers Fed’n v. Harris , 653 F.2d 339, 343 (8th Cir. 1981) (executive branch has discretion in initiation of investigative, enforcement, and prosecutorial actions limited only by constitutional strictures and relevant statutory directives). Finally, we find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in sanctioning Vaughn after concluding that his motions were frivolous and were filed to harass defendants. SeeFed. R. Civ. P. 11(c)(2); Ivy v. Kimbrough , 115 F.3d 550, 553 (8th Cir. 1997) (standard of review); cf. Sassower v. Carlson , 930 F.2d 583, 584-85 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (plaintiff who filed frivolous and vexatious lawsuit was enjoined from filing further actions without first obtaining leave of district court). We also deny Vaughn’s mandamus petition. His claim that the district court deprived him of his constitutional right to a jury trial is frivolous, and, in any event, could have been raised in a timely direct appeal. See Harris v. Interstate Brands-3- Corp. , 348 F.3d 761, 762 (8th Cir. 2003) (grant of summary judgment does not violate Seventh Amendment right to jury trial); In re Cook , 928 F.2d 262, 263 (8th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (writ of mandamus is not substitute for appeal). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JERRY JEAN
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 16

- 3525

[ July 12, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. 10

- 00 1028

CF10A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Pub lic Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina

Jimenez

- Orosa, Senior Assistant Atto rney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

D AMOORGIAN
, L EVINE and K UNTZ

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 14- 212 Date: December 23, 2014

United States

Office of 

Personnel Management 

 

 

 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

 

Subject: Designation for Employer Shared Reporting Responsibilities under Internal 

Revenue Code Section 6056 

 

Background 

On October 3, 2014, OPM issued Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) 14-207, to provide 

guidance on reporting requirements under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 6056. Each

Applicable Large Employer (ALE) member1 is required to furnish reports to the IRS and furnish 

statements to their employees for plan year 2015 with reports due in early 2016. For purposes of 

the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program, a list of ALE members is attached. 

Under IRC 6056(e), an ALE member which is a governmental unit may designate a person to 

file returns on their behalf for purposes of this section. The designated person must be part of or 

related to the same governmental unit as the ALE member.2

Purpose

This BAL provides the designation that agencies must use if they choose to designate their 

reporting responsibilities under IRC section 6056 for purposes of the Federal Employees Health 

Benefits (FEHB) Program. 

Determining the ALE Member Authorized Signatory

ALE members may choose to designate their payroll providers to report on their behalf. The 

designation must be signed by the ALE member’s authorized signatory. The authorized signatory 

should be the contracting officer overseeing the contract with your payroll provider. This could 

be someone in your Human Resources Department or your Chief Financial Officer Department. 

For agencies with a Chief Human Capital Officer (CHCO), the authorized signatory may be the 

1 The ALE is the group of civilian, non-Postal, executive agencies that are permitted by statute to participate in the 

FEHB Program. The ALE members are Cabinet level Departments, independent agencies, boards and commissions 

that make up the ALE. 

2 For more information on IRC section 6056, see http://www.irs.gov/uac/Questions-and-Answers-on-Reporting-ofOffers-of-Health-Insurance-Coverage-by-Employers-Section-6056

 
CHCO. If your agency has a CHCO, please contact the CHCO to have them complete the 

designation. 

Once the ALE member has determined who it would like to designate to report on its behalf and 

the payroll provider accepts this designation, the ALE member must complete the attached 

designation and provide a signed copy to the payroll provider for signature and provide a copy to 

OPM. We only need one copy of the designation per ALE member. 

Timeline

A fully executed copy of the designation must be completed and signed by both parties and 

returned to OPM by January 4, 2015. 

If you have any questions regarding this Benefits Administration Letter please contact Rachel 

Royster at 202.606.4181 or ESR@opm.gov. 

 

 

Sincerely,

John O’Brien 

Director 

Attachments 

2
Personal Identity Verification (PIV) and Common Access 

Cards (CAC) Digital Signature Instructions 

1. Complete all required fields on the fillable FEGLI form.

2. Save the document as a Portable Document Format (PDF).

3. Open the newly saved PDF and select Tools from the menu bar above.

4. Under “Forms & Signatures”, click “Certificates”.

5. You will be taken back to the signature page of the PDF. You will note a new menu bar

toward the top of the screen. Select the Digitally Sign option from the menu bar above.

6. You will then have to outline the box in which you will need to digitally sign.

7. You will be prompted to enter your PIV or CAC passcode. Once the document is

digitally signed, save the document again.
1

Date: June 25, 2010

Subject: Minutes of the June 10, 2010 Conference Call with Nevada Division of 

Environmental Protection

EPA Contract No. EP-D-06-118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4-06

RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French

OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D243-02)

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0239

I. Introduction

A conference call with Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) was held on 

June 10, 2010. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss NDEP’s potential comments to the 

National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Gold Mine Ore Processing and 

Production Area Source Category and Addition to Source Category List for Standards; Proposed 

Rule. This memorandum summarizes the major topics discussed during the meeting.

II. Attendees

Mike Elges, NDEP

Rob Bamford, NDEP

Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Marvin Branscome, RTI International

Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III. Discussion

The major topics discussed during the meeting included compliance testing, monitoring,

reporting, and recordkeeping, the schedule for compliance, and the new source Maximum 

Achievable Control Technology standard for the carbon processes affected source. The NDEP 

explained a few of their concerns and comments regarding the proposed rule.
Exhibit 35.1



AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION

ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.11(a) OF THE

SALE AND SERVICING AGREEMENT AND

ITEM 1123 OF REGULATION AB



I, Paul C. Honda, do hereby
certify that I am the Vice President and Assistant Secretary of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the
"Company"), and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the "Servicer" and "Sponsor")
under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of July 25, 2012 among the Servicer and Sponsor, American
Honda Receivables LLC, as Seller, and Honda Auto Receivables 2012-3 Owner Trust, as follows:



| | (i) | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the reporting period ended March 31, 2013, and of its performance under the
Agreement has been made under my supervision.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such review, the Servicer has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement throughout such period in all material respects.
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
this 31stday of May, 2013.



| | /s/ Paul C. Honda                                   
| | ----------------------------------------------------
| | Paul C. Honda                                       
| | Vice President and Assistant Secretary              
| | (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)
11TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Tim Foote and Keith Cypert, * From the 50th District Court

 of Knox County,

 Trial Court No. 9943

Vs. No. 11-20-00028-CV * January 20, 2022

Texcel Exploration, Inc. * Opinion by Bailey, C.J. 

and Tommy Decker, (Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.,

Trotter, J., and Williams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s opinion, 

the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by 

reason of this appeal are taxed against Tim Foote and Keith Cypert.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 16-802 Date: November 18, 2016 

Subject: The Federal Flexible Spending Account Program (FSAFEDS) Increasing 

Health Care Account Maximum by $50 to $2,600

Purpose 

To notify agencies and participants that the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS) is increasing the maximum contribution to health care and limited expense 

health care flexible spending accounts for the 2017 benefit year. The new maximum 

contribution will increase $50 to $2,600. 

Background 

October 2016, IRS released the Revenue Procedure 2016-55 raising this cap to $2,600 for 

the 2017 benefit year. 

FSAFEDS is adopting this higher maximum for the 2017 benefit year to enhance 

FSAFEDS benefits. 

Questions 

Employees with questions about this change should contact WageWorks at 1-877-

FSAFEDS (372-3337). Employees can enroll and reenroll in FSAFEDS during the 

annual Federal Benefits Open Season (November 14 – December 12, 2016) by going to 

www.FSAFEDS.com or calling 1-877- FSAFEDS (372-3337). 

 Sincerely,

Alan Spielman 

Director

Healthcare and Insurance
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED October 5, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10713 Summary Calendar

MARCUS BLALOCK, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:05-CV-687

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM and GARZA, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM: * Marcus Blalock filed a civil complaint naming State Farm Insurance Company and Dorothy Smith as defendants, alleging that he was involved in an automobile accident with Smith who was insured by State Farm. The district court dismissed the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court determined that diversity of citizenship between the parties did not exist and that a United States Government plaintiff was not a party to the action, despite Blalock’s contrary indication when he filed his complaint.No. 05-10713 -2- Blalock has abandoned his appeal with respect to these determinations by failing to challenge them. See Brinkmann v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner , 813 F.2d 744, 748 (5th Cir. 1987). Blalock argues that the district court had jurisdiction because State Farm’s denial of his personal injury claims violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). No indication of any ADA claim “affirmatively appear[ed]” on the face of Blalock’s complaint. Margin v. Sea-Land Servs.,

Inc. , 812 F.2d 973, 976 (5th Cir. 1987). Thus the district court did not err in dismissing the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332; Nauru Phosphate Royalties, Inc. v. Drago Daic Interests, Inc. , 138 F.3d 160, 163 n.1 (5th Cir. 1998); Margin , 812 F.2d at 976. Accordingly, we AFFIRM the judgment of the district court. Blalock’s motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3457 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3457

 To prohibit the lifting of sanctions on Iran until the Government of 
Iran pays the judgments against it for acts of terrorism, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2015

 Mr. Meehan (for himself, Mrs. Walorski, and Mr. Duffy) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the lifting of sanctions on Iran until the Government of 
Iran pays the judgments against it for acts of terrorism, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Justice for Victims of Iranian 
Terrorism Act''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFTING OF SANCTIONS ON IRAN PENDING PAYMENT OF 
              CERTAIN JUDGMENTS.

    (a) In General.--The President may not waive, suspend, reduce, 
provide relief from, or otherwise limit the application of statutory 
sanctions with respect to Iran under any provision of law, or refrain 
from applying any such sanctions pursuant to an agreement described in 
section 135(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 2160e(a)), 
until the President has certified to the Congress that the Government 
of Iran has paid each judgment against Iran (whether or not the 
judgment was also entered against another defendant) that is described 
in subsection (b).
    (b) Judgments.--A judgment is a judgment described in this 
subsection if the judgment relates to a claim--
            (1) that was brought against Iran, or Iran and any other 
        country;
            (2) for which Iran was not immune from the jurisdiction of 
        the courts of the United States under section 1605A, or section 
        1605(a)(7) (as such section was in effect on January 27, 2008), 
        of title 28, United States Code; and
            (3) that was entered during the period beginning on March 
        4, 2000, and ending on May 22, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00098-CV

Emilio Adame and Kathy Adame

v.

Vista Bank

(No. 2012-568,283 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Statewide efiling fee

Filing $10.00

$25.00

$50.00

$20.00

$100.00 E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID Deirdre Trotter

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on January 30, 2015

.



# Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Commercial Mortgage  Servicing**D1050-084, 8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334 |
|--------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

 

Reference is hereby made tothat certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, byand among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor, WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CertificateAdministrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC,as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor andU.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial MortgagePass-Through Certificates Series 2012-LC5 (the "Agreement").Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meaningsassigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 ofthis Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.            A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”),and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made undermy supervision, and

 

2.            To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, theundersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day of February 2017.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                for the periods presented therein. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                November 6, 2008 | /s/                Noah Gottdiener                                                   |   |
|---------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                  |                |   |
|                                  | NOAH                GOTTDIENER                                                       |   |
|                                  | Chairman                of the Board and                                             |   |
|                                  | Chief                Executive Officer                                               |   |

----
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ JERRY E. THOMPSON

Jerry E. ThompsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerTEPPCO GP, Inc., General PartnerMay 4, 2007