alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al. v. COLEMAN BROS.

No. 11960.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

Jan. 12, 1935.

*698Carl I* Phinney, of Dallas, and ArcMe D. Gray, of Waxahachie, for appellants.

Henry Klepak, of Dallas, for appellee.

BOND, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of a district judge of Dallas county, Tex., granting a temporary restraining order against the Railroad Cpmmission of Texas and the Attorney General of Texas from interfering with appellee’s operation of motor vehicles for hire over the highways of this state.

In appellee’s application for the injunctive order, complaint is made of a decision and order of the Railroad Commission in refusing appellee’s right to operate a motor vehicle on a certain highway within this state, and against the state’s attorney, who, it is claimed, threatens, in the performance of his statutory duties, to go into the courts of this state to prosecute appellee for the violation of the commission’s orders.

The Legislature enacted House Bill No. 335, during the regular session of the Forty-Second Legislature (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. art. 911b, §§ 1-15a, 17-19, 22b, 22c and P. C. art. 1690b), regulating motor carriers of freight for hire over the highways of Texas, and vested the Railroad Commission with the power and authority to regulate such carriers in conformity therewith, and title 25, art. 911b, § 20, Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St., provides that: “If any motor carrier or other party at interest be dissatisfied with any decision, rate, charge, rulé, order, act, or regulation adopted by the Commission, such dissatisfied person, association, corporation, or party after failing to get relief from the Commission may file a petition setting forth the particular objection to such decision, rate, charge, rule, order, act or regulations, or to either or all of them in the District Court in Travis County, Texas, against said Commission as defendant.”

Without passing on the merits of the suit, suffice to state that the recited motor statute confers jurisdiction of such causes on the district court of Travis county, Tex.; hence the district court of Dallas county is without jurisdiction to determine the merits of the cause or to make the restraining order involved on this appeal. The Legislature having specially authorized such action to be brought against the Railroad Commission of Texas, and the issues involved in the application to be determined in a designated forum, district court of Travis county, we must give effect to the Legislature’s intendment; therefore the judgment of the lower court is reversed, this appeal dismissed, and the restraining order dissolved.

Appeal dismissed.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation, Commercial Mortgage
  Pass-Through Certificates Series COMM 2012-CCRE2 Mortgage Trust (the
  "Trust")

  I, Helaine M. Kaplan, of Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving Corporation,
  the depositor into the above-referenced Trust, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of periods covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of the Trust (the Exchange Act Periodic Reports);

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Report, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. as Servicing Function
    Participant, Midland Loan Services, Inc., a Division of PNC Bank,
    National Association as Special Servicer, National Tax Search, LLC as
    Servicing Function Participant, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as
    Operating Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer, Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
    as Custodian, Situs Holdings LLC as Operating Advisor for the 260 and
    261 Madison Avenue Loan, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as
    Certificate Administrator for the 260 and 261 Madison Avenue Loan, and
    Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Custodian for the 260 and 261
    Madison Avenue Loan.

    Dated:   March 29, 2013


    /s/ Helaine M. Kaplan
    Signature

    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
##### 



ONE SHELL PLAZA
    
    AUSTIN910 LOUISIANA
    
    BAKUHOUSTON, TEXAS
    
    DALLAS77002-4995
    
    HOUSTON713.229.1234
    
    LONDONFAX 713.229.1522
    
    MOSCOWNEW YORKRIYADHWASHINGTON




---



##### 



2
    
    September 14, 2007
 1.
    
    The Partnership has been duly formed and is validly existing as a limited partnership
in the State of Delaware under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (the
DRULPA).2.
    
    DRIP Units issued by the Partnership pursuant to the provisions of the Reinvestment
Plan will have been duly authorized by all necessary partnership action.3.
    
    Upon issuance and delivery of DRIP Units from time to time and payment therefor in
accordance with the Reinvestment Plan, the DRIP Units will have been validly issued in
accordance with the Partnership Agreement, fully paid (to the extent required under the
Partnership Agreement) and nonassessable (except as such nonassessability may be affected
by matters described in Sections 17-303, 17-607 and 17-804 of the DRULPA and otherwise by
matters described in the Partnerships Registration Statement on Form 8-A/A filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2007).
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ J. Michael KirkseyJ. Michael KirkseyChief Financial Officer
# Official Journal C 21/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 21 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5228 January 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 21

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5228 January 2009

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | OPINIONS |
| | European Central Bank |
| 2009/C 021/01 | Opinion of the European Central Bank of 6 January 2009 on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on cross-border payments in the Community (CON/2009/1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

OPINIONS

European Central Bank

2009/C 021/01

Opinion of the European Central Bank of 6 January 2009 on a proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on cross-border payments in the Community (CON/2009/1)

1

---

| | III   Preparatory Acts |
| --- | --- |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2009/C 021/02 | European Parliament legislative resolution on the initiative of the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council decision adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff | 7 |

III   Preparatory Acts

COUNCIL

2009/C 021/02

European Parliament legislative resolution on the initiative of the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council decision adjusting the basic salaries and allowances applicable to Europol staff

7

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2009/C 021/03 | Euro exchange rates | 9 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2009/C 021/03

Euro exchange rates

9

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2009/C 021/04 | Notices of open competitions | 10 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2009/C 021/04

Notices of open competitions

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2009/C 021/05 | Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2009/C 021/05

Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT 32.1

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of World Mortgage Exchange Group,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Ron Reeser, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

May 20, 2010                            /s/ Ron Reeser
                                        --------------
                                        Ron Reeser
                                        Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### In the Matter of Louis I. Nash, Petitioner, against Gay Apparel Corporation et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 9, 1958.

*Henry S. Miller*for petitioner.

*Edward J. Mallín*and *Marvin J. Boss*for respondents.

Edgar J. Nathan, J.

Upon the foregoing papers this proceeding to direct defendants to permit an inspection of the books and records of the corporate defendant and its subsidiaries is denied and the cross motion to dismiss the petition is granted.

It appears from the petition and the terms of the contract annexed thereto that petitioner has only a contingent interest in the stock. which is still registered in his name. Under the contract petitioner sold his stock to the corporation. The stock is held in escrow pending final payment of the purchase price. Outside of the right to have the stock returned to him in the event of the purchaser’s default, petitioner transferred all his rights to the stock to the corporation. Under these *769circumstances petitioner, having sold his stock, cannot obtain an inspection of the corporate records *(Matter of Gaines*v. *Huyler,*4 Misc 2d 935, affd. 190 App. Div. 941).

While petitioner is afforded a right to an inspection under the contract, he may not enforce that right by way of an article 78 of the Civil Practice Act proceeding *(Matter of Weidenfeld*v. *Keppler,*84 App. Div. 235).

Settle order.
EX-34.8
(logo) Grant Thornton

Audit * Tax * Advisory

Grant Thornton LLP
201 South College Street
Suite 2500
Charlotte, NC 28244

T 704.632.3500

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Board of Directors

Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc


We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying
Management's Certification Regarding Compliance with Applicable Servicing
Criteria ("Management's Report"), that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc. (the
"Company") complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2013, except for those criteria noted as not applicable (N/A)
within Exhibit A. The transactions covered by this report are only those
transactions processed by the Company in its capacity as trust, senior trust or
operating advisor for the asset backed securities transactions (the "Platform").
Reference Exhibit B for the transactions covered by this examination. Management
is responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing
criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the
Platform based on our examination.


Our examination was conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria for the Platform and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination
included testing selected asset-backed transactions and securities constituting
the Platform and evaluating whether the Company performed servicing activities
related to those transactions and securities in compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the period covered by this report. Accordingly, our
testing may not have included servicing activities related to each asset-backed
transaction or security constituting the Platform. Further, our examination was
not designed to detect material noncompliance that may have occurred prior to
the period covered by this report and that may have affected the Company's
servicing activities during the period covered by this report. We believe that
our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination
does not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.


1


(page)


In our opinion, management's assertion that Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.
complied with the applicable servicing criteria identified in Exhibit A and
Exhibit B as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013 for the Platform is
fairly stated, in all material respects.


Charlotte, North Carolina

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

March 1, 2014


2
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the
undersigned officer of Lodestar Mining, Incorporated (the “Company”), hereby
certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report, on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”), fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating,
acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed
form within the electronic version of this written statement required by
Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.





/s/ Ian McKinnonIan
      McKinnon, Chief Executive Officer, Director, PrincipalExecutive
      Officer, Principal Financial Officer, PrincipalAccounting
      Officer, Treasurer
December 29,2016

U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 Ground Floor, West Building Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue SE Washington D.C. 20590

Subject: Extension ofExemption from 14CFRPart 65.75(a) to allow the Aviation Mechanic General (AMG) written tests to be administered after completing the corresponding portion ofthe curriculum Exemption Number: 11819 Docket Number: FAA-2010-1256 (Previous)

Dear Sir or Madam, 

## TMENT OF PORTATION I

## 0 P 3: 

## 2b OPERATIONS

National Aviation Academy operates an FAA approved Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS), in Concord, Massachusetts under AirAgency Certificate number EC6T068K.
Petition: National Aviation Academy is requesting an extension ofExemptionNumber 11819 relating to 14 CFRPart 65.75(a) to allowthe Aviation Mechanic General writtentest (AMG), to be administered after completing the corresponding portion ofthe approved curriculum.
ReliefSought: National Aviation Academy is seeking an extension from 14 CFRPart 65.75(a) to allow students enrolled in its FAA Approved 14 CFRPart 147 Aviation Maintenance Technician School (AMTS) to take the Aviation Mechanic General written tests (AMG) after completing the corresponding portion ofthe curriculum, priorto meeting the experience requirements of§65.77.• 

### • Persons to be covered by the exemption: National Aviation Academy, Air Agency CertificateNumber EC6T068K and students enrolled in its AMTS programs utilizing the Airframe, Powerplant orAirframe and Powerplant curricula. Information, views or arguments to support the action sought: There has been no change inthe conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for grantingthe original exemption. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent and any delay in acting onthis petition would be detrimental to National Aviation Academy and the students served by it.

Joseph M. Moore Director ofEducation National Aviation Academy-New England

cc: David Cardullo BostonFlight Standards District Office 1200 District Avenue Burlington, Mass. 01803
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, NicholasGaleone, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this reporton Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C3 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the periodcovered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except asdisclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreementsin all material respects; and

 

5. All ofthe reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordancewith Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, exceptas otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed inthis report on Form 10-K.

 

In givingthe certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer,Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian, and Park Bridge Lender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated:October 25, 2019

 

 

/s/Nicholas Galeone

 

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                (18 U.S.C. 1350)


     In connection with the Report of Best Energy Services, Inc. (the "Company")
on  Form  10-Q  for  the  quarter  ended  September  30, 2010, as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Harrington, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   the Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a)
          or  15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

     2.   the information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.

                                   Date: November 19, 2010

                                   By: \s\ Dennis Irwin
                                       ----------------
                                   Dennis Irwin
                                   Chief Financial Officer