alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4806-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-4806-DR), dated August 10, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued September 13, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 10, 2024.

Baker County for Individual Assistance (already designated for Public Assistance).

Citrus, Hillsborough, and Pinellas Counties for Individual Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-22840 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of Nacel Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, March Schaftlein, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




/s/ Mark SchaftleinMark SchaftleinChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Accounting OfficerAugust 22, 2011
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Albert Ross, Defendant.

County Court, Schenectady County,

July 21, 1958.

*George V. Palmer*for defendant.

*Morris Marshall Cohn, District Attorney {W. Albert De Matteo*of counsel), for plaintiff.

Archibald O. Wemple, J.

The defendant contends that the indictment upon which this conviction rests is vague and indefinite, and that the People have not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of the crime even as vaguely charged in the indictment.

The District Attorney contends that the indictment complies with section 275 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in that it contains a plain and concise statement of the act constituting the crime and that if the defendant had wished, he might have demurred to the indictment or asked for a bill of particulars, neither of which was done in this case.

This court finds, that the indictment plainly, clearly and concisely charges the defendant with having operated a motor vehicle on a public highway in the county of Schenectady on or about March 1, 1958 in an intoxicated condition. There is no unnecessary repetition. There can be no doubt in the defendant’s mind as to the nature of the charge. If the defendant had wished more specific details as to the time and place of the alleged offense, he could have made application to obtain such information by a motion for a bill of particulars.

During the trial, the defendant admitted having been intoxicated during a period previous to noontime on March 1, 1958, the date of the alleged crime, and having driven his car at that time. He denied that he was the operator of the car at *871the time of his arrest. He stated that his friend, who was not licensed, was operating his car and that he said he was driving to avoid getting his friend in trouble.

The People had the burden of proof of showing that the defendant committed the crime charged. The People called the arresting officer, Patrolman. Andrew E. Shell, who stated that he observed the defendant in the act of operating his car about 12:00 m. on a public highway known as Curry Road in the town of Rotterdam. There was evidence of a blood test showing that the alcohol in the defendant’s blood from a sample taken within two hours of the arrest, showed a 0.21% alcoholic content.

This testimony was supported by competent witnesses.

The jury found that the People had proved the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.

The jury was the judge of facts and found a verdict of guilty. The defendant has not presented any convincing reason to arrest the judgment herein. Motion denied.

Submit order.
| (logo) WELLS

         FARGO | Commercial Mortgage Servicing

D1086-120, 12th Floor

550 South Tryon Street 

Charlotte, NC 28202

1-800-326-1334 |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

 

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as Trust Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C8 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 4th day of March 2016.

 

 

/s/ Daniel Bober

Daniel Bober

Executive Vice President

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

|  Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

  | (logo) Together we’ll go far |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

- 2029

December 3, 2013

Mr. David K. Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

P.O. Box 1105

Richmond, Virginia 23210

Dear Mr. Paylor:

On November 13 , 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a

revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of

Environmental Quality . The SIP revision pertains to the Regional Haze SIP 5

- Year Progress

Report. EPA has determined that the submittal is administratively and technically complete, and

is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may dire ct them to Ms. Irene

Shandruk, at (215) 814

- 2166. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

David Arnold for Diana Esher, Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Tom Ballou, VADEQ
NUMBER 13-15-00019-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

SKY VIEW AT LAS PALMAS, LLC

AND ILAN ISRAELY, Appellants,

v.

ROMAN GERONIMO MARTINEZ MENDEZ

& SAN JACINTO TITLE SERVICES

OF RIO GRANDE VALLEY, LLC, Appellees.

 

On appeal from the 370th District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Perkes

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellants, Sky View at Las Palmas, LLC and Ilan Israely, perfected an appeal 

from a judgment entered by the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause 

number C-1401-10-G(4). The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal on 
2

grounds that all matters in controversy between them in this cause have been settled. 

The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to 

dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). 

The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In 

accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring 

same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax 

costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at the parties’ request, no 

motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

GINA M. BENAVIDES,

Justice

Delivered and filed the

7th day of March, 2019.
##### 



(TARGA LOGO)
    
    1000 Louisiana, Suite 4300 
Houston, TX 77002 
713.584.1000
www.targaresources.com
 Targa Resources Partners LP Agrees to Acquire Assets from Targa Resources, Inc.
 
  $




---



##### 



About Targa Resources Partners
  Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
    2




---



##### 



Six MonthsEnded June$ in millions
    
    30, 2007Pro forma net income (loss)
    
    
    (2.5
    )Add:Pro forma interest expense *
    
    
    12.7Deferred tax expense
    
    
    0.0Depreciation and amortization expense
    
    
    7.2Non cash mark-to-market hedge adjustment
    
    
    21.0EBITDA
    
    
    38.4
 
 *
    
    Reflects interest expense on an estimated $355 million incremental borrowing   3




---



##### 



Six MonthsEnded June$ in millions
    
    30, 2007Pro forma net income (loss)
    
    
    (2.5
    )Non cash mark-to-market hedge adjustment
    
    
    21.0Depreciation and amortization expense
    
    
    7.2Deferred tax expense
    
    
    0.0Incremental debt issue costs *
    
    
    0.3Accretion expense
    
    
    0.1Maintenance capital expenditures
    
    
    (3.2
    )Distributable cash flow
    
    
    22.9
 
 *
    
    Reflects amortization expense associated with incremental debt issue costs Forward-Looking Statements
  4




---



##### 



http://www.targaresources.com
 
 5
**MP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 19 - 0370 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. MICKEY RODNEY PAYNE ,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellees ’ motion for a 3 0 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is gran ted an extension of time to and including November 12 , 2020 , within which to prepare, serve, and file its response brief.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 6 2020

10/06/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0370
EXHIBIT 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER





I, Morry F. Rubin, certify that:





1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Anchor Funding Services, Inc.;





2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The registrant's other certifying officer (if any) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:





a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;





b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision,  to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting


and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance  with generally accepted accounting principles;





c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.





DATE: August 13, 2009
By:
/s/ MORRY F. RUBINMorry F. RubinChief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of TRIPLE A MEDICAL, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  August 16, 2010





/s/ P. Morgan McCune





Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  August 16, 2010





/s/ P. Morgan McCune





Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTER

U. S. Office of Personnel Management

Number: P-97-06 Date: March 27, 1997 

SUBJECT: QUARTERLY REPORTING OF HEALTH BENEFITS DATA 

Over the past few years, some of the Health Maintenance Organizations participating in

the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program have filed claims against it. The basis of

these claims has been the carriers' contention that they have not received all the FEHB

premiums due them for their enrollees. 

To address this area, OPM requires each FEHB Carrier to reconcile its enrollment on

quarterly basis. To further this objective, Payroll Offices are required to provide carriers

with the names of enrollees by payroll office and the premium paid for each of those

enrollees for the current pay cycle. We are re-issuing the attached payroll office letter

92-06. Please be advised that, beginning with the quarter ending March 31, 1997, each

payroll office must send the quarterly Health Benefits Reconciliation report to all health

plans (not just prepaid plans).

At a minimum, you should already be providing this information in hard copy. We

strongly encourage you to provide these data in an automated format, if possible. We

have also enclosed Benefits Administration Letter 97-202, dated March 5, 1997, which

suggests communication software for transmitting this report electronically via modem. 

We will continue to work with you and the carriers to strengthen the reconciliation

process and provide the carriers with the necessary information to ensure the accuracy

of their records. Your active assistance in this process is critically important.

 Robert A. Yuran, Chief

 Financial Management Division

Attachments (3)
#### Zelda Keppler, Respondent, *v.*Loew’s Boulevard Corporation, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

March 27, 1958.

*912
      *Archie Weltman, Thomas Bress*and *Seymour Smith*for appellant.

*Sidney FluJce*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Plaintiff has failed to prove any actionable negligence on defendant’s part. It was in the province of the jury to find that it was raining and the usual added factor of danger existed from the dampness, but this was not enough. The portion of the lobby where plaintiff fell was an open and exposed place and defendant failed to provide a safer or drier place than the sidewalk, but the evidence does not show that the condition was more dangerous than the ordinary condition of a sidewalk on a rainy day.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed, with costs.

Steuer and Aurelio, JJ., concur; Hofstadter, J. P., concurs for reversal of judgment but dissents from dismissal of complaint and votes for a new trial.

Judgment reversed, etc.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Sears Canada Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the 52-week period ended February 1, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Douglas Campbell, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




March 14, 2014





By:/s/ Douglas CampbellDouglas CampbellPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-17-0000151

21-JUL-2017

09:55 AM
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rostock Ventures Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rotelli, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Gregory Rotelli By: Gregory Rotelli Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: August 20, 2012     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.