alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 29, 2010

s0322 

# Order

March 29, 2010

139900

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139900 COA: 291613 Grand Traverse CC: 76-003094-FY JACK EUGENE LOWN, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 10, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered , and it is DENIED, because the defendant has
failed to meet the burden of establishi ng entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
Carbon Capture Demonstration Projects of Interest

Scheduled

Date of 

Operation

Project Name State Description Capture 

Type

DOE Funding Status/Additional Details

2014 Plant Ratcliffe

Mississippi Power

MS Air-blown 582 MW IGCC plant 

using a coal-based transport 

gasifier

Precombustion$270 million Being constructed

2015 Texas Clean Energy Project 

Summit Power Group

TX 400 MW IGCC polygeneration 

plant 

Precombustion$450 million CPS Energy signed a PPA with Summit 

Power Group in January 2012

2015 Indiana Gasification 

Leucadia

IN Coal gasification project that

includes a methanation process 

to produce pipeline quality 

synthetic natural gas

PrecombustionTBD Public comment period on draft PSD 

and operating permits closed January 

30, 2012

2016 Taylorville Energy Center

Tenaska

IL 602 MW IGCC power plant Precombustion$2.579 billion 

loan guarantee

Being debated in state legislature

Sources: Global CCS Institute

 Indiana Department of Environmental Management

 Chicago Tribune

2012

•NSPS proposal

2013 2014

•Plant Ratcliffe

2015

•Texas Clean 

Energy Project

•Indiana 

Gasification

2016

•Taylorville 

Energy Center
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ken MacAlpine, certify that:

1.          
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sombrio Capital Corp.;

2.          
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.          
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.          
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:

(a)          
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b)          
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c)          
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;

5.          
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

(a)          
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

(b)          
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 23, 2009

/s/ Ken MacAlpine Ken MacAlpine President, Secretary
and Treasurer (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)

---
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO                                                         18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                             SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Disaboom, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, J.W. Roth, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ J.W. RothChief Executive Officer

Dated:  August 14, 2007

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6521

STACY W. HOWARD, Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

GEORGETOWN COUNTY GOVERNMENT BODY; CHARLES V. PYLE; MALCOLM D. SHULER; BENJAMIN F. DUNN; HUGHEY WALKER; ELERBEE ACKERMAN; ROBBIE O’DONNELL; LANE CRIBB, Sheriff; DAN FURR; AL WILLIAMS, Chief; JOHN HILLIARD; G. TURNER PERROW; JOE CROSBY; MIKE SWARTZ; CHUCK KOSIS; KENNETH OWENS, Captain; GEORGETOWN COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; MUNICIPAL CORPORATION; SOLICITORS OFFICE; TOWNSHIPS IN GEORGETOWN COUNTY; ADMINISTRATION OF GOVERNMENT FOR GEORGETOWN COUNTY, including government body and political subdivisions; OTHERS AS YET UNKNOWN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-36-6-13AK)
Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 1, 2004
Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Stacy W. Howard, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 3 - PER CURIAM: Stacy W. Howard appeals the district court’s order, accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief on Howard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v. Georgetown County Gov’t , No. CA-04-36-6-13AK (D.S.C. Feb. 19, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22677]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 380 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-736, K2024-29.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22677 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

 REGION IX 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105

JUNE 25, 2010 

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT Tribal Consultation on Notice of Proposed Approval for the Las Vegas Valley 

Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan, Redesignation Request and Wintertime 

Gasoline Rule Changes. 

FROM Karina O’Connor 

 Air Division 

TO Jefferson Wehling, ORC 

This is a record of the tribal consultation conducted to communicate with any tribes in the Las 

Vegas Valley carbon monoxide (CO) nonattainment area with regard to EPA’s proposal to 

approve submittals by the State of Nevada related to the CO national ambient air quality standard 

(NAAQS or “standard”) in the Las Vegas Valley nonattainment area located within Clark 

County, Nevada. The only tribe in the CO nonattainment area is the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe. 

On Friday, June 25, 2010, I had a conference call with Atef Elzeftawyof the Las Vegas Paiute 

Tribe. I summarized the components of the plan and EPA’s upcoming proposed action on the 

plan. Atef indicated that he had reviewed the plan and was very supportive the plan and our 

upcoming action. He also mentioned that the tribe was working with Roy Ford of Region 9 to 

site some ambient monitors in the tribal area. He asked if Clark County would continue to 

monitor CO under the plan and indicated that the downtown Las Vegas area was of most interest 

to the tribe. I indicated that the Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental 

Management would continue to operate the existing monitors under the maintenance plan and 

would need to evaluate and bring back contingency measures if a future violation was measured. 

I also indicated that I would contact Atef when EPA signed and then published the notice. Atef 

also indicated that he would try to attend future Air Quality forum meetings in Clark County.
EXHIBIT 23.3
 [Westward Environmental, Inc. Letterhead]


September 15, 2015


Emerge Energy Services LP 180 State Street, Suite 225 Southlake, TX 76092


Ladies and Gentlemen:


The undersigned hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-196465) of references to our firm in the form and context in which they appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Emerge Energy Services LP for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Form 10-K”) and any amendments thereto. We hereby further consent to the use in such Form 10-K and Form S-3, and any amendments thereto, of information contained in our reports setting forth the estimates of reserves of Superior Silica Sands LLC as of December 31, 2014.





Respectfully submitted,


Westward Environmental, Inc.s/s Tommy Mathews, PG 5321Tommy Mathews, PG, REM PresidentTX License No. 5321Firm No. 50112
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0501 Directorate ID: 2011-SW-036-AD

Helicopter Model: Eurocoper France Model EC 155B and EC155B1 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): XX Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the fittings to prevent loss of the 

upper fin and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $3,311

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the inspection of the 

fittings and about 3 

inspections would occur 

before replacing the fittings. 

It would take 8 work hours to 

replace the fittings.)

$765

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $4,246

Total US Fleet Cost $38,214

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
Exhibit 12-1


                  PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPAINES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   SEC METHOD
                                     ($000)

                                          12 Months
                                            Ended
                                          12/31/96

NET INCOME                                $517,205

ADD BACK:

-INCOME TAXES:
    OPERATING INCOME                      $343,105
    NON-OPERATING INCOME                   ($3,004)
                  NET TAXES               $340,101


-FIXED CHARGES:
      INTEREST APPLICABLE TO DEBT         $366,360
      ANNUAL RENTALS ESTIMATE               $8,789
      TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                 $375,149


ADJUSTED EARNINGS INCLUDING AFUDC       $1,232,455



RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES            3.29
**EXHIBIT 23.3****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We have issued our reports dated March 16, 2007 accompanying the consolidated financial statementsof Integrated Service Company, LLC and subsidiary as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the relatedconsolidated statements of operations, members’ equity and cash flows for each of the three yearsin the period ended December 31, 2006. We consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement of the aforementioned reports and to the use of our name as it appears underthe caption “ Experts .”/s/ Grant Thornton LLPTulsa, OK
## MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

**FAA -** **2012 -**  **1127** Docket Number **2010 -**  **SW -**  **035 -** **AD** Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket Bell Helicopte r Textron Alert Service Bulletin (ASB) No. 430 - 05 - 35, dated June 21, 2005; and Bell Helicopter Textron ASB No. 430 - 01 - 22, dated April 30, 2001.



### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Do cket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Robert T. Ray, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 2 to the Annual Report of The Houston Exploration Companyon Form 10-K/A; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internalcontrol over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to providereasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparationof financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally acceptedaccounting principles;  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: April 2, 2007 /s/ Robert T. Ray   Robert T. Ray   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 26, 2010 

d0222 

Order 

 

February 26, 2010 

138603(63) 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138603 

 COA: 281764 

Shiawassee CC: 07-005024-FC 

DAVID GADDIS STUCKEY, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

23, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously. 

 CAVANAGH, J., would grant reconsideration.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 343 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-689, CP2024-698.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22614 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
BRIAN VICTORIAN Petitioner, V THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee. FILED IN 1ST COURTOFAPPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 

### JUL 16 2015 CAUSE No. 01-13-01004-CR Christopher&prine CLERK. 

# \%PR' § § § § IN THE DISTRICT COURT 182nd APPEAL OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS (Tr.Ct. No.1363644).
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

### This motion for extension of time is: brought by petitioner, requesting an extension of time. Petitioner recieved via certified 

### mail the direct review findings on July 14, 2015. 

### Additional time to respond is needed and would be greatly appriciated. This request is not designed to harass or cause unecessary delay in these proceedings. Petitioner needs additional 

### time in order to appropriately compile an effective petition for review motion. PRAYER 

### I do certify that the foregoing is true and correct, petitioner prays that motion for an extension of time be granted. A true and correct copy of this said motion will be placed in the United 

# States Mail on or about: r)U\>I \^ (s&I)•

•iah Victori¥n#18198737 Mark W. Stiles Unit 3060 Route 3514 Beaumont, Texas 77705

# e^oyWi(&r7an^M757 -200)0 pr)3SI4



# §ffiumooV,T> mas oL- !*• i'.'""iC>"•"•'•? Ms""!! *'':7'yy"V'\i 'T'.v
RECEIVED FIRSTCOURT ^F APPEALS HOUSTON, IbXAS



### JUL 16 2015 CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK 5JBUL-2P15 'PJfi^'S.



# 17002. /"70022G6693 

### '1.|1|Hllil.||||IH|,.|.„lll..,..|||li|.||.l|..||||.||.|||.<l.|