alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of MIP Solutions, Inc, (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gary MacDonald, Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 81 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:       /s/ Gary MacDonald

Chief Executive Officer and Director



May 19, 2011



A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the registrant and will be retained by the registrant to be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT KAREN EM ELIN OLIVO, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 09-70218 Age n c y No. A094-915-810 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 18, 2014 * * B e fore : ALAR C ÓN, O’ SC ANNLAIN, a nd FER N ANDEZ, C irc uit Judge s. Kare n Em e lin Olivo, a

native and c itiz e n of El Sa l va dor, pe titions for re vie w of the B o ard of Im

m igration Appe a ls’ orde r dism issing her a ppe a l from

an im m igration judge ’ s de c i sion de ny i ng he r a pplic at ion for a sy lum , withholding of re m ova l, a

nd prote c tion unde r the C onve ntion Agai nst Torture(“ C AT” ). W e have 

# FIL ED FEB 24 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S . CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se eFe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).jurisdic tion unde r 8 U.S.C . § 1252. W e re vie w for substa ntia l e vide n c e the a ge nc y ’ s fa c tua l findings, Ze haty ev . Gonzale s , 453 F.3d 1182, 1184-85 (9th C ir. 2006), a nd we de ny

the pe tition for re vie w. Substa ntia l e v i de nc e supports the a ge nc y ’ s finding tha

t Olivo fa ile d to show the g ove rnm e nt of El Sa lva dor wa s unwilling or una ble to c ontrol theindividuals who ha rm e d he r. Se eC

astro-Pe re

z v . Gonzale

s , 409 F.3d 1069, 1070-72 (9th C ir. 2005) (fa ilure to re port non-gove rnm e nta l pe rse c ution dueto be lie f that polic e would do nothing did not e s ta blish tha t gove rnm e nt wa s unwilling or una ble to c ontrol a ge nt of pe rse c ution). Ac c ordingly , Olivo’ s a sy lum c la im fa ils. B e c a use Olivo fa ile d to m e e t the lowe r burde n of proof for a sy lum , he r c la im for withholding of rem ova l ne c e ssa rily fa ils. Se eZe haty e , 453 F.3d a t 1190. Fina lly , substa

ntia l e v ide nc e a lso supports the a g e nc y ’ s de nia l of C AT re lie f be c a use Olivo fa ile d to show it is m ore like ly tha n not shewill betorture d with the c onse nt or a c quie s c e nc e of the gove rnm e nt if re turne d to El Sa lva dor. Se eSilay a v . Muk ase y , 524 F.3d 1066, 1073 (9th C ir. 2008). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDE NIE D.

2 0 9 - 7 0 2 1 8
EXHIBIT 32

OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Ronald O. Black                  
|                      |  | Ronald O. Black                      
|                      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Thomas W. Wayne                  
|                      |  | Thomas W. Wayne                      
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer              



|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STEAM ELECTRIC

C B I R E P L AC E M E NT P A G E

EPA

- HQ

- OW

- 20 09

- 0819

DCN:

________________________________________

T H E FO LL OW ING H AS BEE N R E M O V E D BE CAUSE IT

C O N T AINS C O N F ID E N T IAL B USIN E SS IN FO RMA T I O N

(C B I) P E R 4 0 C F R P ART 2

, SU B P ART B

. SE 04 331A0 34
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 10-404 Date: October 15, 2010 

Subject: 2010 Federal Benefits Open Season: Conducting the Open Season

This is the last Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) in our series of 2010 Federal 

Benefits Open Season BALs. This BAL (10-404) provides instructions on conducting 

the Federal Benefits Open Season. You can find previously issued Open Season BALs at 

www.opm.gov/retire/pubs/bals/bal10.asp. 

This BAL is divided into six sections as indicated below to more efficiently provide 

information regarding your responsibilities for the upcoming Open Season. 

 Attachment 1: Inform Employees and Provide Information about Open Season

 Attachment 1A: Federal Benefits FastFacts: The 2010 Federal Benefits Open

 Season is Coming! 

 Attachment 1B: Federal Benefits FastFacts: What to Consider During the

 Federal Benefits Open Season 

 Attachment 1C: FSAFEDS Program Flyer

 Attachment 2: Advise Employees on the Federal Benefits Programs

 Attachment 3: Process Enrollment Actions

The Federal Benefits FastFacts: The 2010 Federal Benefits Open Season is Coming 

(Attachment 1A) provides a snapshot of basic information on the upcoming Federal 

Benefits Open Season. The Federal Benefits FastFacts: What to Consider During the 

Federal Benefits Open Season (Attachment 1B) provides a step-by-step process of what 

to think about during Open Season. The FSAFEDS Program Flyer provides information 

on how enrollees can save money. Please distribute these attachments to your 

employees. We will issue other FastFacts on topics relating to the Federal Benefits 

Programs throughout the year via the benefitsinfo listserv. These FastFacts will also be 

available at www.opm.gov/insure/fastfacts. 

This year’s Federal Benefits Open Season will run from Monday, November 8 through 

Monday, December 13, 2010. 

1
2

The Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Program and the Federal Long 

Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP) are not participating in this year’s Federal 

Benefits Open Season. 

If you have specific questions, please contact your agency’s benefits officer. If you do 

not know who this person is, please go to http://apps.opm.gov/abo/ where you will find a 

list of agencies and their Headquarters Benefits Officers. 

We look forward to working with you in the upcoming 2010 Federal Benefits Open 

Season for enrollment for the 2011 Plan Year. Again, we encourage you and your 

employees to visit www.opm.gov/insure. 

Sincerely, 

 William B. Zielinski 

Associate Director 

Retirement & Benefits
November 17 , 2010

MEMORANDUM TO: EPA Docket # EPA- HQ - OAR- 2009 - 0211 FROM: Robert Anderson , Environmental Protection Specialist , EPA /OAR/OTAQ/CISD RE: Preliminary Data from Tier DOE Catalyst Durability Program (V4/CRC E - 87 - 2) Attached is an Excel spreadsheet that contains preliminary data from the DOE Catalyst Durability Test Program also referred to as the DOE V4 program or the CRC E - 87 - 2 program. These data are preliminary results for the non -Tier 2 vehicle portion of the test program. The enclosed spreadsh eet contains all data for non -Tier 2 vehicles submitted to EPA from DOE as of November 17 , 2010. It should be noted that these data are preliminary and therefore, subject to change based on ongoing QA/QC . For more information, please contact Robert Ande rson at either anderson.robert@epa.gov or (202) 343 - 9718 .
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 355 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-703, CP2024-712.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22626 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Best Energy Services, Inc.
(the “Company”) for the quarter ended October 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark
Harrington, as Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to
the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





(1)
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended; and








(2) 
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




/s/
      Mark HarringtonMark
      HarringtonChief
      Executive Officer and Principal Accounting OfficerMay
      20, 2009
#### WESTERN ASSUR. CO. v. SECURITY TRUST CO.

No. 9631.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 19, 1935.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1935.

T. M. West, Nat L. Hardy, and Frank B. Buchanan, all of San Antonio, for plaintiff in error.

Jesse I. Edwards and Marion A. Olson, both of San Antonio, for defendant in •error.

BICKETT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by Western Assurance Company from a judgment rendered against it for $321.29 in favor of C. F. Gibson, receiver of Security Trust Company, upon a policy of fire insurance.

The policy was in the form of the “Texas Standard Fire Policy,” and contained the usual exceptions from general liability. There was neither pleading nor proof to negative the existence of facts that' might bring the loss within the exceptions. The judgment must therefore be reversed upon the ground of failure to make out a •cause of action within the terms of liability under the policy. Boston Ins. Co. v. Fitzpatrick (Tex. Civ. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 897, and cases there cited.

The insurance company had paid to a prior lienholder, named as the mortgagee in the mortgage clause attached to the policy, the amount of that lienholder’s debt and had taken an assignment of its lien. There may have been various considerations that prompted the payment to the prior lienholder. It cannot be implied from that payment having been made that the insurer admitted the fire to have been within the coverage of the policy. This case is distinguishable from New York Underwriters Insurance Co. v. Shanks (Tex. Civ. App.) 78 S.W.(2d) 1026. In that case the appointment of appraisers for the adjustment of the loss with the claimant was held to be a recognition that the loss was within the terms of the policy. But in this case there has been no act of admission as between the insurer and defendant in error. There was no privity between defendant in error and the prior lienholder, to ‘whom a payment was made, so as to constitute an admission available to defendant in error.

As it is intimated in the briefs that the evidence upon a future trial may be different, other questions presented are not considered necessary to be discussed.

The judgment of the district court is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-901 Date: January 3, 2002 

Subject: Phone Number and Website for LTC Partners

As we promised in BAL 01-906, LTC Partners, our contractor for the Federal Long Term Care 

Insurance Program (FLTCIP), has established a toll-free phone number, 1-800-582-3337 (1-800-

LTC-FEDS), and a website, www.ltcfeds.com. 

The sample employee notice we attached to BAL 01-906 directed employees to our website at 

www.opm.gov/insure/ltc if they had any questions about the program. The new phone number and 

website address for LTC Partners appear on our website so there is no need to send your employees 

another notice. However, if you haven’t yet distributed the sample employee notice from BAL 01-

906, you may wish to add LTC Partners phone number and website address at the bottom of the 

notice. Please also publicize this information as appropriate for your agency. 

Representatives from LTC Partners will be contacting each of the FLTCIP agency implementation 

coordinators soon to discuss the best ways to distribute information about the program to 

employees. Implementation coordinators should be sure they are familiar with their agencies’ 

distribution channels for both printed and electronic matter. We will be updating agency payroll 

office representatives on FLTCIP matters on January 9th, and a representative from LTC Partners 

will be with us to share more information about the program at the upcoming Benefits Officers 

Network meeting in the OPM auditorium at 9:30 am on January 28th. 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Frank D. Titus 

 Assistant Director for Long Term Care
Exhibit 10.166







NOTICE OF RESCISSION


OF AMENDMENT TO STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT


 


To:   [Recipient Name] (Employee Number:  nnnnn)


Dated:  June 12, 2014


 


Reference is made to the Stock Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”) dated [Date] between you and Covisint Corporation (the “Corporation”) pursuant to which the Company granted to you a stock option to purchase [#shares] shares of the Corporation’s common stock (“Shares”) at $[price] per share, upon the terms and conditions contained therein and in the Covisint Corporation 2009 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), as amended by that certain amendment dated May 8, 2014 pursuant to which the Corporation added a “tandem” Stock Appreciation Right (the “Tandem SAR Amendment”).  Pursuant to this Notice of Rescission, the Corporation hereby rescinds the Tandem SAR Amendment in its entirety, effective as of the initial effective date thereof, such that the Tandem SAR Amendment shall have no force or effect whatsoever and shall create no rights or obligations whatsoever of one party against the other and the Option Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as if such Tandem SAR Amendment had not occurred.


 


Nothing herein shall be held to alter, vary or otherwise affect the terms, conditions, and provisions of the Option Agreement, except as noted above.







	
 

	
Very truly yours,


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
COVISINT CORPORATION


	
 

	
 

	
 

	
 


	
 

	
By:

	/s/ Michael A. Sosin	
 


	
 

	
 

	
Michael A. Sosin

	
 


	
 

	
 

	
Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
#### ROWAN v. BENDER MOTOR CO.

No. 1556-5887.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

June 9, 1932.

Joseph W. Hale and George Clark, both of Waco, for plaintiff in error.

Witt, Terrell & Witt and Albert Riley, all of Waco, for defendant in error.

HARVEY, J.

 In this case the plaintiff in error, N. W. Rowan, recovered in the trial court a judgment for damages against the defendant in error, the Bender Motor Company. The latter appealed, and the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the trial court and remanded the cause. 33 S.W.(2d) 263. No fundamental error appears in the record. The judgment of reversal was based on grounds of error which are not fundamental and which were not covered by any assignment of error contained in the brief filed in that court by the motor company. No assignment of error at all was copied in said brief. According- to the holding in Clonts v. Johnson, 116 Tex. 489, 294 S. W. 844, the consideration, by the court, of assignments of error not copied in the brief, as prescribed by Court of Civil Appeals Rule 32, was unauthorized'. The judgment rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals, therefore, will hare to be reversed. It appears, however, that while the case was under submission in that court, the motor company, on August 21, 1930, duly filed a motion for leave to amend its brief so as to incorporate therein the assignments of error contained in the transcript, and upon which the motor company relied as presenting grounds for reversal. On August 26, 1930, Rowan filed answer to said motion, in which he resisted the granting of said motion. On November 13, 1930, the said court entered an order granting the motor company’s motion for leave to amend its brief, and at the same time entered judgment reversing the judgment of the trial court, and remanding the cause. It thus appears that the motor company was not afforded an opportunity, before the case was decided, to amend its brief in accordance with the permission which the court granted. That the court had authority to grant the permission it did, we do not doubt. The amendment of briefs in the Court of Civil Appeals, so as to make them conform to court rules, is a procedural matter which is subject to the court’s control, in the exercise of judicial discretion. Rules 37 and 40, Court of Civil Appeals.

We recommend that the judgment rendered by the Court of Civil Appeals be reversed, but, in our opinion, the cause should be remanded to that court for further consideration, and we so recommend.

CURETON, C. J.

Judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals reversed, and cause remanded to that court for further consideration, as recommended by the Commission of Appeals.

We approve the holdings of the Commission of Appeals on the questions discussed in its opinion.
# Official Journal C 23/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 23 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6517 January 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 23

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6517 January 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 23/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10519 – BLACKSTONE / INTERPLEX) (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2022/C 23/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10396 – GIP / MERIDIAM / NEW SUEZ) (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2022/C 23/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10551 – AMALFI INVEST OPPORTUNITIES / LA DORIA) (
  1
  ) | 3 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 23/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10519 – BLACKSTONE / INTERPLEX) (
  1
  )

1

1

2022/C 23/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10396 – GIP / MERIDIAM / NEW SUEZ) (
  1
  )

1

2

2022/C 23/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10551 – AMALFI INVEST OPPORTUNITIES / LA DORIA) (
  1
  )

1

3

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2022/C 23/04 | List of appointments made by the Council – September - December 2021 (social field) | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2022/C 23/04

List of appointments made by the Council – September - December 2021 (social field)

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Investment Bank |
| 2022/C 23/05 | SIT 2022 – Call for proposals – Ideas that change the world: the EIB Institute’s 2022 Social Innovation Tournament | 11 |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 23/06 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10576 – BAIN CAPITAL / HELLMAN & FRIEDMAN / ATHENAHEALTH GROUP) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 12 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Investment Bank

2022/C 23/05

SIT 2022 – Call for proposals – Ideas that change the world: the EIB Institute’s 2022 Social Innovation Tournament

11

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 23/06

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10576 – BAIN CAPITAL / HELLMAN & FRIEDMAN / ATHENAHEALTH GROUP) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

12

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN