alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending April 30,      2008, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for      the period ending April 30, 2008, fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of      Max Cash Media, Inc. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:       June 16, 2008               |
|----------------------------------------------|
|                                         |
| /s/ Henry      Ender                         |
| Henry      EnderChief      Executive Officer |
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERANDCHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

I, Ian McBean, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of Auror Capital Corp., (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, as amended by
        Amendment No. 1, of the Company for the quarter ended April 30, 2007 (the
        “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
        and
| | ---- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                             



| | By:    | /s/ Ian McBean             
| | ------ | ---------------------------
| |        |                            
| | Name:  | Ian McBean                 
| |        |                            
| | Title: | Chief Executive Officer and
| |        | Chief Financial Officer    
| |        |                            
| | Date:  | August 21, 2007            

---
##### 



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): October 22, 2007
 SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-33412
(Commission
File Number)
    
    72-1264943
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 717 Texas Avenue, Suite 3150
Houston, Texas 77002
 (713) 910-1875
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
  -1-




---



##### 



SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.Dated:  October 24, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Roger D. BurksRoger D. BurksExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
United States 

 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 15-201 Date: February 2, 2015

Subject: Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program: New Addresses for the Office of 

Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (OFEGLI)

The Office of Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (OFEGLI), the unit of MetLife that pays 

FEGLI claims and processes conversion requests, has moved three of its mail processing functions. 

These changes are effective immediately.

FEGLI Claims and Regular Mail NEW: Requests for FEGLI Conversion ONLY

OFEGLI 

P.O. BOX 6080 

SCRANTON, PA 18505-6080 

OFEGLI

200 PARK AVENUE

NEW YORK, NY 10166-0188

NEW: Overnight deliveries only (such as 

express mail) of FEGLI claims and regular mail

NEW: Overnight deliveries only (such as express 

mail) of Requests for FEGLI Conversion

OFEGLI

10 ED PREATE DRIVE

MOOSIC, PA 18507

OFEGLI

200 PARK AVENUE

NEW YORK, NY 10166-0188

This information will be posted on the FEGLI website at www.opm.gov/life. We will be updating 

FEGLI publications to reflect the new contact information. 

Mail is temporarily being forwarded from prior addresses. If you recently sent mail to a prior 

address, you can confirm receipt by contacting OFEGLI at 1-800-633-4542. 

If you have any other questions or comments regarding this BAL, you may contact us at 

fegli@opm.gov. 

Thank you for your help and cooperation. 

 Sincerely, 

 

John O’Brien

Director 

Healthcare and Insurance
#### Ex parte TALLY.

No. 17803.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 16, 1935.

Frank E. Mann, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the county court of Colorado county refusing an application for a writ of habeas corpus presented by this appellant. Examination of the record leads u§ to conclude that the judgment of the court below should be upheld. The application for the writ sets out that a judgment theretofore rendered against appellant finding him guilty of a violation of some phase of the truck law was void because the complaint did not charge an offense against the laws of this state. No copy of the complaint was attached to the application, and the manifest insufficiency of such application for this reason would be evident. It was further stated in the application that evidence submitted to the court on the trial was admitted over the objections of the appellant. If any evidence was set out or referred to, it does not properly appear in this record. What purports to be a statement of facts is not approved by the trial judge. We might further observe that, inasmuch as this case originated in the justice court where appellant was tried and convicted, from which conviction he appealed to the county court and was again there tried and convicted, and his fine fixed at a sum much less than . $100, the matter of the admission of testimony asserted to be improperly received could not be reviewed by this court in an appeal from the refusal of a habeas corpus. It is provided by law that a case tried in the county court upon appeal from the justice court, wherein the amount of the fine is less than $100, cannot be carried up to this court, at least not on any question relating to the evidence.

Believing the action of the trial court to. be correct and that the record shows no error, the judgment refusing the application for the writ of habeas corpus will be affirmed.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 16, 2018

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D17-2706

Lower Tribunal Nos. 11-30171 & 12-10420

________________



### Maximiliano Rey

, Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida

, Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the

Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Milton Hirsch

, Judge.

Maximiliano Rey

, in proper person.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Jonathan Tanoos

, Assistant

Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LINDSEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM.Maximiliano Rey appeals from an order denying his motion for clarification

of jail credit. We affirm without prejudice for Rey to first exhaust his

administrative remedies with the Department of Corrections and, if unsatisfied

with the outcome, to file a petition for writ of mandamus against the Department. 1

See Watkins v. State

, 14 So. 3d 1128, 1129 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (explaining that a

defendant’s “claim that the [Department of Corrections] incorrectly interpreted his

sentences is not cognizable in a motion for clarification” (citing Edward v. State

,

966 So. 2d 1012, 1013 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007))); Dunbar v. State

, 225 So. 3d 971,

972 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017) (“As an inmate in the custody of the [Department of

Corrections], Dunbar must fully exhaust his administrative remedies regarding

gain time or credit owed within the [Department of Corrections] before he is

entitled to pursue judicial remedies.”); LaFerte-Diaz v. Dep't of Corr.

, 187 So. 3d

908, 909 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016) (“If after exhausting his administrative remedies,

Diaz is not afforded the relief sought, he may file a petition seeking a writ of

mandamus to compel the Department [of Corrections] to credit him with the full

amount of jail time awarded by the trial court.”).

1 To the extent Rey seeks to argue for the first time on appeal that the trial court’s

written sentence does not conform to the oral pronouncements, the proper

mechanism by which to raise such a claim is through a Rule 3.800(a) motion. See

Williams v. State

, 957 So. 2d 600, 601 (Fla. 2007) (“[A] claim asserting a

discrepancy between an oral and written sentence is cognizable in a rule 3.800(a)

proceeding for correction of an illegal sentence.”).

2We further affirm without prejudice for Rey to raise a claim asserting a

discrepancy between the oral and written sentence by filing a motion pursuant to

Rule 3.800(a). See Brown v. State

, 225 So. 3d 319, 321 (Fla. 3d DCA 2017).

Affirmed.

3
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON ENERGY CONSERVATION STANDARD

NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULE FOR METAL HALIDE LAMP FIXTURES

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW

Washington, DC 20585

Friday, September 27, 2013

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) is holding this public meeting to discuss the energy 

conservation standard notice of proposed rule. DOE will also explain its plans for the 

remaining analyses for the rulemaking. Lastly, DOE will seek comment on the 

rulemaking, including planned methodologies, assumptions, and data sources.

Agenda

9:00 am – 9:10 am Welcome; Introductions; Opening Statements

Lucy deButts and Doug Brookman

9:10 am – 10:00 am Overview, Scope, Market and Technology Assessment, 

Screening Analysis

Lucy deButts and Matthew Walker

10:00 am – 11:00 am Engineering Analysis

Matt Chester

11:00 am – 11:15 am Break

11:15 am – 11:45 pm Energy Use, Markup Analysis, Life-Cycle Cost and 

Payback Period Analysis

Michael Myer and Scott Morris

11:45 am – 12:15 pm Shipments, National Impact Analysis

Michael Myer and Scott Morris

12:15 pm – 1:15 pm Lunch

1:15 pm – 1:45 pm Manufacturer Impact Analysis

Hayden Cook

1:45 pm – 2:15 pm LCC Subgroup Analysis, Employment Impact Analysis, 

Emissions Analysis and Monetization of Emissions, 

Regulatory Impact Analysis

Michael Myer and Scott Morris

2:15 pm – 2:45 pm Proposed Standard

Matthew Walker

2:45 pm – 3:00 pm Closing Remarks

Lucy deButts
# POSTFLIGHT FIELD CHECKLIST

1 / 1 | Page PIC AIRCRAFT RELATED GSC RELATED

DESCRIPTION INITIALS DESCRIPTION INITIALS

Aircraft Landed and Secured Save Flight Logs

Aircraft Disarmed Print Actual Mission Flown

Payload Power Down Modify & Save Mission if Necessary

Aircraft Power Down Get Ready for Next Flight

Inspect Propellers for Condition GSC END OF DAY

Fill out Mission Card Power Down Flight & Payload Computers

Swap Batteries Remove Charging Batteries

Get Ready for Next Flight Power Down Battery Chargers

PIC END OF DAY Power Down Antenna Tracker

Disassemble and Remove Payload Disconnect Comms Equipment

Remove Flight Batteries Disconnect Sure Power

Breakdown Motor Booms Secure & Pack Equipment

Download Current Flight Logs

Pack Transmitter Equipment

Pack S900 Aircraft

Secure & Pack Equipment

Fill Out Appropriate Logs
OPM.gov / Retirement

Skip to main content

### In this section

- My Annuity and Benefits Toggle submenu   - Services Online
  - Life Events
  - Annuity Payments
  - Healthcare & Insurance
  - Medicare
  - Thrift Savings Plan
  - Related Federal Benefits
  - Retirement Eligibility Surveys
  - Representative Payees
- CSRS Information Toggle submenu   - Eligibility
  - Computation
  - Creditable Service
  - Planning and Applying
  - Types of Retirement
  - Survivors
  - Military Retired Pay
  - Service Credit
  - Former Employees
- FERS Information Toggle submenu   - Eligibility
  - Computation
  - Creditable Service
  - Planning & Applying
  - Types of Retirement
  - Survivors
  - Military Retired Pay
  - Service Credit
  - Former Employees
- Phased Retirement
- Retirement Statistics
- Special Notices
- Federal Ball Park Estimator
- FEGLI Calculator
- Tax Information for Annuitants
- Publications & Forms Toggle submenu   - Pamphlets
  - Retirement & Insurance Forms
  - Benefits Administration Letters
  - Financial Management Letters
  - Payroll Office Letters
  - CSRS/FERS Handbook
- Benefits Officers Center Toggle submenu   - List of Benefits Officers
  - Tools
  - Aids
  - FERS Election Options
  - Training
  - Reference Materials
- Pre-Retirement
- Post-Retirement
- Leaving the Government
- Survivor Benefits
- How to Make a Payment
- Quick Guide
- Contact Retirement
- Retirement Information Center
- Application Tips

### Resources For

          - New / Prospective Employees
          - Federal Employees
          - Retirees or Family Members
          - Benefits Officers

# Retirees or Family Members

Useful information for new retirees as well as several online tools and forms all retirees can use.

## Guidance and Publications

Find the answers you need in these resources
                  - My Annuity 
                  - CSRS and FERS Handbook
                  - FEHB Handbook
                  - FEGLI Handbook
                  - Social Security Handbook

## Related Resources

These related resources are designed to explain additional benefits available for Federal retirees and their families.
                  - Social Security Administration
                  - Thrift Savings Plan
                  - Department of Labor, Office of Workers' Compensation
                  - Flexible Spending Accounts
                  - Long Term Care Insurance (LTCI) Program

## Quick Links

Frequently accessed OPM links
                  - Services Online
                  - Death of Annuitant/Survivor
                  - Forms
                  - Online Tools

## After Retirement

Frequently referenced sources for Retirees and their Famililes after retirement
                  - New Retirees
                  - Life Events
                  - CSRS Disability Benefits
                  - FERS Disability Retirement
                  - Family Benefits
                  - Post Retirement
                  - Post Retirement FAQ's
#### Gaines GREEN, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 20037.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1938.

John M. Mathis, Jr., of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for receiving and concealing stolen property; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

Upon the written request of the appellant, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.
#### PRINCE v. WILLIS.

No. 2167.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Sept. 28, 1939.

Chrestman, Brundidge, Fountain, Elliott & Bateman, of Dallas, for appellant.

■ Touchstone, Wight, Gormley, Strasburger & Price, of Dallas, for appellee.

GALLAGPIER, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted in the district court of Ellis County by appellee, Hiram Willis, against appellant, H. H. Prince, to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been suffered as the result of a collision between a car operated by appellant and a car in which appellee was riding. Appellee resided in Ellis county and appellant resided in Dallas county. Appellant filed a plea of privilege to be sued in the county of his residence, which plea was duly controverted, and upon a hearing,.was overruled.

This is a companion case to case entitled H. H. Prince v. E. J. Miller, 131 S.W.2d 1077, this day decided, and involves the same state of facts considered in that case. For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the trial court overruling the plea of privilege is affirmed.
# Official Journal C 346I/2017

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 346I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6016 October 2017 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 346I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6016 October 2017

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council of the European Union |
| 2017/C 346 I/01 | Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/1860, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1859 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea | 1 |
| 2017/C 346 I/02 | Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea apply | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council of the European Union

2017/C 346 I/01

Notice for the attention of the persons and entities subject to the restrictive measures provided for in Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/849, as amended by Decision (CFSP) 2017/1860, and in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509, as implemented by Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1859 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea

1

2017/C 346 I/02

Notice for the attention of the data subjects to whom the restrictive measures provided for in Council Regulation (EU) 2017/1509 concerning restrictive measures against the Democratic People's Republic of Korea apply

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 15.1**

** **

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLICACCOUNTING FIRM**

** **

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-184408 on Form S-8 of ourreport dated July 29, 2016, relating to the consolidated financial statements of Amira Nature Foods Ltd and subsidiaries (the “Company”)for the years ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the year ended March31, 2016.

 

**/s/ ASA & Associates LLP**

New Delhi, India

 

July 29, 2016****

** **

** **
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8) pertaining tothe 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan of Grant Prideco, Inc. of our report dated March 29, 2005, withrespect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Grant Prideco, Inc., for the yearended December 31, 2004, included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission./s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLPHouston, Texas
Exhibit
      32.3 - Chief Financial Officer Certification (Section 906)




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**




SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Adrenalina (the "Company") on Form
      10-Q
      for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the U. S. Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"). I, Michael Labinski,
      Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350,
      as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      the
      best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/
                Michael LabinskiMichael
                LabinskiChief
                    Financial Officer **Date** **August
      14, 2008**
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 14, 2020

NO. 03

- 19

- 00589

- CV

Samuel J. Burleson, Appellant

v.

Ken Anderson and The State of Texas, Appellee s

APPEAL FROM THE 425TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUN TY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES BAKER AND T RIANA

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE BAKER

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the tr i a l court on July 15, 2019 . Having reviewed the

record , the Court holds that appellant has not prosecuted his appeal and did not comply with a

notice from the C lerk of this C ourt

. There fore, the Cour t dismisses the appeal for want of

prosecution. Because appellant is indigent and u nable to pay costs, no adjudica t i on of costs is

made.