79306 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Notices 

should use the relay services offered 

within their country to make 

international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 

3011(d) of the Military Lands 

Withdrawal Act (MLWA) of 1999 (Pub. 

L. 106–65) withdrew approximately 

608,385 acres of public land for the 

McGregor Range from all forms of 

appropriation under public land laws 

and reserved them for use by the Army. 

The withdrawal will expire on 

November 6, 2026, unless extended by 

Congress. The Army has filed an 

application for extension of the current 

withdrawal for 25 years. Extension of 

the withdrawal is warranted by the 

purpose of the withdrawal established 

by Congress: to allow for continued 

military use of the McGregor Range, 

which is used to train military 

personnel and test equipment to meet 

nationally directed missions and 

requirements. 

The public land withdrawn under 

Public Law 106–65 encompasses 

approximately 608,385 acres in Otero 

County, New Mexico. As noted in a 

previous Federal Register notice (66 FR 

26881, May 15, 2001), this land is 

accurately described under a previous 

Federal Register notice (52 FR 18960, 

May 20, 1987) and two Federal Register 

correction notices (52 FR 22577, June 

12, 1987; 52 FR 26188, July 13, 1987). 

The Engle Act (Pub. L. 85–337, 43 

U.S.C. 155–157) requires withdrawals 

for defense purposes of more than 5,000 

acres in the aggregate for any one 

defense project or facility to be 

authorized by an Act of Congress. 

Section 3016 of the MLWA requires the 

Army to notify the Secretary of the 

Interior and Congress whether there is a 

continuing military need for the 

withdrawn land. The Army and the 

Department of the Interior (DOI) intend 

to submit a legislative proposal for 

extension of the withdrawal and 

reservation to Congress not later than 

May 1, 2025. 

As required by section 204(b)(1) of the 

Federal Land Policy and Management 

Act of 1976, 43 U.S.C. 1714(b)(1), and 

BLM regulations at 43 CFR part 2300, 

the BLM is publishing notice of the 

Army’s application. While the BLM and 

the DOI assist the Army with the 

processing of withdrawal applications, 

and the Secretary of the Interior makes 

a recommendation to Congress on 

applications for withdrawals of this size 

for defense purposes, Congress will 

decide whether to extend the existing 

withdrawal for the McGregor Range. 

The Army is preparing a legislative 

EA in support of the legislative proposal 

and is conducting public scoping under 

NEPA. The Army will host a joint 

virtual public scoping meeting and will 

accept comments on potential 

alternatives, potential environment 

impacts, information, and analyses 

relevant to the proposed action. The 

BLM is participating as a cooperating 

agency in the preparation of the 

legislative EA. Information on the 

environmental review process can be 

viewed using the link in the ADDRESSES

section. This notice invites the public to 

comment on the application for 

withdrawal extension, notifies the 

public that a public meeting will occur, 

and provides the opportunity for the 

public to review the legislative EA. 

For a period until December 26, 2024, 

all persons who wish to submit 

comments in connection with the 

withdrawal application and the 

legislative EA may present their 

comments in writing to the address 

listed in the ADDRESSES section. All 

comments received will be considered 

before the Secretary of the Interior 

makes any recommendation to 

Congress. 

Before including your address, phone 

number, email address, or other 

personal identifying information in your 

comment, you should be aware that 

your entire comment, including your 

personal identifying information, may 

be made publicly available at any time. 

While you can ask us in your comment 

to withhold your personal identifying 

information from public review, we 

cannot guarantee that we will be able to 

do so. 

The withdrawal extension application 

will be processed in accordance with 

MLWA, and to the extent consistent 

with MWLA, the regulations set forth in 

43 CFR 2310.4. 

(Authority: 43 CFR 2310.4) 

Melanie G. Barnes, 

State Director. 

[FR Doc. 2024–22130 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4331–23–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1419] 

Certain Exercise Equipment and 

Subassemblies Thereof; Notice of 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

August 15, 2024, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Balanced Body, Inc. of 

Sacramento, California. A supplement 

to the complaint was filed on September 

6, 2024. The complaint, as 

supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain exercise equipment and 

subassemblies thereof by reason of the 

infringement of certain claims of U.S. 

Patent No. 8,721,511 (‘‘the ’511 patent’’); 

U.S. Patent No. D659,205 (‘‘the D’205 

patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. D659,208 

(‘‘the D’208 patent’’). The complaint 

further alleges that an industry in the 

United States exists as required by the 

applicable Federal Statute. The 

complainant requests that the 

Commission institute an investigation 

and, after the investigation, issue a 

general exclusion order, or in the 

alternative a limited exclusion order, 

and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: 

The authority for institution of this 

investigation is contained in section 337 

of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 

19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

September 23, 2024, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Notices 79307 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–15, 19–21, and 23–26 of the ’511 

patent; the claim of the D’205 patent; 

and the claim of the D’208 patent, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘exercise equipment 

known as Pilates reformers’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Balanced 

Body, Inc., 5909 88th St., Sacramento, 

CA 95828. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Guangzhou Oasis, LLC, d/b/a 

trysauna.com, 1942 Broadway St., 

Suite 314C, Boulder, CO 80302 

Ciga Pilates, 22/F, Star House, 3 

Salisbury Road, Tism Sha Tsui, KL, 

Hong Kong 

Shandong Tmax Machinery Technology 

Co. Ltd., 2nd Floor, No. 21, Building 

1, Qixi Market, Xinhua Sub-district, 

Dezhou City, Shandong Province, 

China 253024 

Shandong VOG Sports Products Co. 

Ltd., South, 50 meters east of the 

intersection of Zhenhua Street and 

Commercial Street, Ningjin County, 

Dezhou City, Shandong Province, 

China 253400 

Dezhou Bodi Fitness Equipment Co., 

Ltd., No. 17 Taishan Road, Small and 

Medium-sized Enterprise Park, 

Ningjin County Development Zone, 

Dezhou City, Shandong Province, 

China 

Suzhou Selfcipline Sports Goods Co., 

Ltd., Unit 384, Room 1601, Building 

1, Yueliangwan, International 

Business Center, No. 9 Cuiwei Street, 

Suzhou Industrial Park, China 

(Jiangsu), Pilot Free Trade Zone, 

Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 23, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–22149 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1420] 

Certain Smart Televisions; Notice of 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

August 22, 2024, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Maxell, Ltd. of Japan. A letter 

supplementing the complaint was filed 

on September 10, 2024. The complaint, 

as supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain smart televisions by reason of 

the infringement of certain claims of 

U.S. Patent No. 8,549,109 (‘‘the ’109 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 11,451,860 

(‘‘the ’860 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

11,924,502 (‘‘the ’502 patent’’); and U.S. 

Patent No. 10,958,971 (‘‘the ’971 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by the applicable 

Federal Statute. The complainant 

requests that the Commission institute 

an investigation and, after the 

investigation, issue a limited exclusion 

order and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

September 23, 2024, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claim 4 

of the ’109 patent; claims 7–11 of the 

’860 patent; claims 1, 4, 6, 11, 12, 15, 

17, and 22 of the ’502 patent; and claim 

1 of the ’971 patent, and whether an 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1