alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Conclusion and Summary

As set forth herein, KM Video Productions, LLC seeks an exemption pursuant to 14 C.F.R.

11.61 and Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (FMRA), which will permit the safe operation of the DJI Phantom 2 Vision+ UAS commercially, without an airworthiness certificate, for limited use conducting aerial video and photography in Camden
South Carolina and the Central South Carolina area.

By granting this petition, the FAA Administrator will be fulfilling the Congressi onal mandate of
the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 , while advancing the interests of the public, by allowing KM Video Productions, LLC to safely, efficiently and economically operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision + UAS commercially within the National Air Space.

Wherefore, in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, S ection 333, KM Video Productions, LLC r espectfully requests that the Administrator grant this Petition for an exemption from the r equirements of 14 C.F.R. S ections 61.113(a)& (b), 91.7(a), 91.121, 91.151(b), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1)&(a)(2), and 91.417(a)&(b), and permit KM Video Productions , LLC to operate the DJI Phantom 2 Vision + UAS commercially for the purpose of co nducting aerial video and photography over certain
areas of the United States.

Dated: June 19, 2015

Respectfully submitted, KM Video Productions , LLC

__________________________________ __
KM Video Productions , LLC Kirk Mays 1110 A Broad Street Camden, SC 29020 Email: kirk@kmvideoproductions.com
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Information Systems
Associates, Inc. (the "Company") for the three months ended March 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph P.
Coschera, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify that:
 
 * The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
Joseph P. Coschera
 Joseph P.
Coschera
 Chief
Executive Officer &
 Chief
Financial Officer
 Date: May
17, 2010
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 Repros Reports That Patients Exposed to Proellex For Up To Six Months  Demonstrated A Benign
Endometrium Based On Biopsy
   1 2
  Histology Results




---



##### 



3,4,5




---



##### 



About Repros Therapeutics Inc.
   Any statements that are not historical facts contained in this release are forward-looking
statements that involve risks and uncertainties, including Repros ability to have success in the
clinical development of its technologies, the timing of enrollment in such clinical studies and the
accuracy of such studies, Repros ability to raise additional capital on acceptable terms or at
all, and such other risks which are identified in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2006, and Repros Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2007, as they may be updated by the Companys Exchange Act filings from time to time. These
documents are available on request from Repros Therapeutics or at www.sec.gov. Repros disclaims any
intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
 Contact:
    
    Joseph S. Podolski
President & CEO
(281) 719-3447
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81533]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23221]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Viral 
Dynamics and Transmission Study Section, October 24, 2024, 08:00 a.m. 
to October 25, 2024, 06:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 
Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 which was 
published in the Federal Register on September 27, 2024, 89 FR 79302.
    This meeting is being amended to change the meeting start and end 
time from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. The meeting 
is closed to the public.

    Dated: October 3, 2024.
Bruce A. George,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-23221 Filed 10-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the
Annual Report of Sterling Consolidated Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Darren DeRosa, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: April 16, 2013 | By: | /s/ Darren DeRosa                                                                   | 
|-------------------- | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|                     |     | Darren DeRosa
        Chief Executive Officer
        (Principal Executive Officer) | 



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the
electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, (the “Report”) as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Jack J. Sandoski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:







(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.










/s/
                Jack J. SandoskiJack
                J. SandoskiSenior
                Vice President andChief
                Financial OfficerAugust
                9, 2007





*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Abington Bancorp, Inc. and will be
      retained by Abington Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Treasury

###### Internal Revenue Service

Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the Treasury by General Counsel Directive 15, pursuant to the Civil Service Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the Legal Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:

1. Eric S. Nguyen, Deputy General Counsel, Department of the Treasury—Chair

2. Elizabeth P. Askey, Deputy Chief Appeals, Independent Office of Appeals (IRS)

3. Melanie R. Krause, Chief Operating Officer, (IRS)

Alternate: Douglas W. O'Donnell, Deputy Commissioner (IRS)

This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

Marjorie A. Rollinson,

Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.

[FR Doc. 2024-23234 Filed 10-7-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and President of Empire State Realty OP, L.P. (the Company), hereby certifies on the
date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Form
10-K), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                       |  |                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------
|Date: March 27, 2014 |  |  |  | EMPIRE STATE REALTY OP, L.P.         
|                     |  |  | 
|                     |  |  |  | By:                                   |  | /s/ Anthony E. Malkin
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer and President

Pursuant to the Securities and Exchange Commission Release 33-8238, dated June 5, 2003, this
certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or incorporated by reference in any registration statement of the Company filed under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 03-313 Date: December 18, 2003 

SUBJECT: IMPUTED COST FACTORS FOR FIRST QUARTER OF FY 2004 

This Letter provides the imputed costs factors for the Federal civilian benefit programs for the first 

quarter of FY 2004. Agencies will use these cost factors to calculate their imputed costs relating 

to the "pensions" (the Civil Service Retirement and Federal Employees' Retirement Systems), the 

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program and the Federal Employees Group Life Insurance 

Program. To support the requirement to produce quarterly financial statements, we will provide 

updated cost factor information prior to the beginning of each quarter as well as at fiscal year-end 

for annual reporting purposes. 

PENSIONS 

CSRS. For most or “regular” CSRS employees, the imputed cost factor for the first quarter of FY 

2004 is 25.0 percent of basic pay. The cost factors for other categories of CSRS coverage are 

attached. 

FERS. For regular FERS employees, the imputed cost factor for the first quarter of FY 2004 is 

12.0 percent of basic pay. The cost factors for other categories of FERS coverage are also on the 

attachment. 

FEDERAL EMPLOYEE HEALTH BENEFIT PROGRAM 

The imputed cost factor for the first quarter of FY 2004 for the Federal Employee Health Benefit 

Program is $1,077. 

Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal 

Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal 

Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal 

Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program 
 2 

FEDERAL EMPLOYEES LIFE INSURANCE PROGRAM 

The cost factor for the first quarter of FY 2004 for the Federal Employees Life Insurance Program

remains 0.02 percent of basic pay. 

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, 

so we have a record of them. You may of course call us on 202-606-0606. 

 

Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

Financial Policy Group 

Center for Financial Services 

Attachment 
 3 

COST FACTORS FOR THE CSRS AND FERS 

CSRS 

Category Cost Factor (%) 

Regular 25.0 

Regular offset 19.5 

Law enforcement officers 40.3 

Law enforcement officers – offset 35.7 

Air traffic controllers 33.5 

Air traffic controllers – offset 28.7 

Members of Congress 28.4 

Members of Congress – offset 26.1 

Congressional employees 33.9 

Congressional employees – offset 28.7 

FERS 

Category Cost Factor (%) 

Regular 12.0 

Law enforcement officers 25.1 

Air traffic controllers 24.4 

Members of Congress 17.7 

Congressional employees 17.9 

Military reserve technicians 14.7 

CIA Special Overseas 17.2
EXHIBIT 32

OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that
Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Ronald O. Black                  
|                   |  | Ronald O. Black                      
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                   | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Thomas W. Wayne                  
|                   |  | Thomas W. Wayne                      
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer              

*This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard
contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



Page 24
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO

SECTION 1350,CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES CODE,

ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of Global Aviation Holdings Inc., (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William A.Garrett, Chief Financial Officer, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)        The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)        The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the datesand for the periods referred to in the Report.

 

 
| Date: November 24,  2010 | By:    | /s/ William A.  Garrett |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|
|                               |   | William A. Garrett           |
|                               |   | Chief Financial Officer      |

 

A signed original of thiswritten statement required by Section 906 has been provided to GlobalAviation Holdings Inc. and will be retained by Global Aviation Holdings Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
#### MEADOWS v. STATE.

No. 17451.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Baker & Baker, of Coleman, for appellant.

A. O. Newman, Dist. Atty., of Coleman, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Pending the passage of a law by our Legislature making effective the amendment to our Constitution, adopted on August 24, 1935, repealing sections 20(a-c), inclusive, of article 16 of our Constitution, and substituting new and different provisions relating to the traffic in intoxicating liquors, this case and others similar upon the dockets of this court have been held in abeyance. The law referred to was passed by the Legislature, and signed by the Governor, on November 15, 1935; having passed with sufficient majority to make it immediately effective.

Section 49, article 1 of said act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 49) is as follows: “Chapter 7 of Title II (arts. 666-694a), Penal Code of Texas of 1925, and all amendments thereto are hereby expressly repealed. Title 80 (arts. 5075-5114), Revised Civil Statutes, 1925, and all amendments thereto are hereby expressly repealed.”

The chapter 7 referred to in the above quotation contains all of what is known as the Dean Law relating to the various phases of violations of law against the manufacture, sale, transportation, and possession of intoxicating liquors, etc., and fixing penalties therefor. Article 14, P.C., provides that upon the repeal of a law, if the repealing statute substitutes no other penalty, this exempts from punishment all persons who may have violated such repealed law, unless it be otherwise declared in the repealing statute. Examination of the recent act embracing section 49, supra, reveals that the entire Dean Law, including all of its penalties, was repealed, and that said repealing act substitutes no penalties, and makes no provision for the further prosecution or punishment of those persons whose cases had not been finally disposed of at the time of the passage of this act, either upon the dockets of this court or those of any trial courts of this state wherein the accused stands charged with violation of any of the provisions of said Dean Law.

Such being the case, this court has no option but to direct that the motion for rehearing in this case be granted, the judgment of affirmance set aside, all opinions heretofore rendered withdrawn, and that the cause be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed, all of which is accordingly done.
#### RAILROAD COMMISSION et al. v. TIPS.

No. 2249.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Sept. 28, 1939.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and Geo. W. Barcus and Glenn R. Lewis, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellants.

Scott Reed, of Groesbeck, for appellee.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This suit was brought by Julius C. Tips against The Railroad Commission of Texas and others, to enjoin the enforcement of the Texas Truck Law. The trial court granted a temporary injunction and an appeal was prosecuted to this court by the defendants. Since that time plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the suit in the lower court. Appellants have filed a motion' to reverse the cause and dissolve the injunction.

The rule seems to be that when the original suit is dismissed in the trial court while the case is pending before the appellate court for review of order granting temporary injunction, the question becomes moot and it is the duty of the appellate court to dismiss the case. Connecticut Gen. Life Ins. Co. v. Mathis, Tex.Civ.App., 91 S.W.2d 1184; International Ass’n of Machinists, Local Union No. 1488 v. Federated Ass’n of Accessory Workers, Tex.Com.App., 130 S.W.2d 282.

Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court granting temporary injunction is reversed, the injunction dissolved, and the suit dismissed. All costs incurred in this court as well as in the trial court will be assessed against the appellee and the sureties on his injunction bond.
Dear Sir or Madam,

I run a company called High Flying Images (www.highflyingimages.com) which operates 

UAS within Europe and now in the USA. Our current aerial system in the USA is a DJI 

Inspire 1 which we would like to operate within the New Jersey area for aerial 

photography of real estate. 

I have many years of safe flying of RC aircrafts and safety is always our upmost priority. 

We would like to be considered for an exemption under the current FAA 333 ruling.

Please let me know if I have not provided enough information or you would like more 

details 

Best regards, Jeremy Ryan
U.S. Department of TransportatkJn Federal Avialion Adminislratlon Office of the Ch'1ef Counsel

BY CERTIFIED MAIL -RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 Re: In the matter ofTrans Time Express; FDMS No. FAA-2012-1260 800 Independence Ave., S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591



# RECEJ\'ED DEC

- 12016 HEARING DOCKET

I hereby file my Notice of Appearance in this matter. Charles Raley, the attorney formerly assigned to this matter, is no longer attorney ofrecord for the Federal Aviation Administration in this matter. Going forward, I will be the attorney ofrecord and all communications for the Federal Aviation Administration should be addressed to Andrew Lambert, Attorney, Enforcement Division/AGC-300, Office of the Chief Counsel, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20591, (202) 267-7617, facsimile (202) 267-5106. Sincerely,

EnforcementDivision, AGC-300 Office ofthe ChiefCounsel Telephone: (202) 267-2617 Facsimile: (202) 267-5106CC by Fax and Federal Express: CameronNialcan, Esq. 10101 Grosvenor Pl. #620 Rockville, MD 20852 Facsimile: (877) 287-6117

Office ofAdministrative LawJudges National Transportation Safety Board 490 L'EnfantPlazaEast, SW, Room 4704 Washington, DC 20594 Attn: Judge Stephen R. Woody Facsimile: (202) 314-6158