alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 375 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-731, K2024-24.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22672 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Bancorp, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, (the Report) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jack J. Sandoski, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| |                                                                                                                                                                      
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1)
           The Report fully
 complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |                                                                                                                                                                      
| | (2)
           The information
 contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
 financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                           
| | --------------------------
| | /s/ Jack J.
 Sandoski     
| |                           
| | Jack J.
 Sandoski         
| | Senior Vice
 President and
| | Chief
 Financial Officer  
| | May 9, 2008               

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 of the SarbanesOxley Act has been provided to Abington Bancorp,
Inc. and will be retained by Abington Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Ian McBean, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A  of Auror
Capital Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small
business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change
in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the
small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting;

5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and
material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small
business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,
that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: September 17, 2009

/s/ Ian McBeanIan McBeanPresident, Secretary
and Treasurer(Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer)

---
#### SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W., v. GORDON.

No. 12871.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

July 1, 1933.

Rehearing Denied July 22, 1933.

Dightfoot & Robertson, of Fort Worth, and Rainey T. Wells, of Omaha, Neb., for appellant.

Mike E. Smith and Ratcliff & Christian, all of Fort Worth, for appellee.

DATTIMORE, Justice.

The beneficiary of a death certificate was informed by the financial secretary of the local lodge of appellant fraternal benefit society that no liability existed on such certificate. She employed appellee to represent her in collecting same, and he undertook the case; she assigning him one-fourth thereof if recovery was without suit.

Thereafter appellant paid the entire claim to the beneficiary, and suit below was for such one-fourth on the allegation that appellant knew of such assignment. Trial was before the court and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff.

The copy of a letter claimed to have been written by appellee to appellant, stating therein that he had said assignment, should not have been admitted in evidence. No predicate was laid therefor by demand for the original and no opportunity was given the appellant to produce the original. It is therefore unnecessary for us to pass on the circumstances indicating such letter was not mailed.

Appellee notified the financial secretary of the local lodge of the assignment, and prior *629to the delivery of the proceeds of the policy to the wife Trinidad, the financial secretary read the written assignment.

The secretary had the duty to assist in making proofs of death, notify the appellants who were entitled to the proceeds, and deliver such proceeds to the parties entitled to same as determined by the appellant, and was the only representative in such matters of appellant in the city where these transactions took place.

The notice to him of the assignment was notice to appellant. Supreme Lodge, K. of P., v. Withers, 177 U. S. 260, 20 S. Ct. 611, 44 L. Ed. 762; Home Forum v. Varnado (Tex. Civ. App.) 55 S. W. 364; Calhoun v. The Maccabees (Tex. Com. App.) 241 S. W. 101.

The appellee in presenting the claim as attorney for the named beneficiary was directed by appellant to “take the matter up directly” with said secretary. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., v. Miller (Tex. Civ. App.) 220 S. W. 635.

We have examined all assignments, most of them complaining of findings of fact by the trial court. The evidence is sufficient to justify those findings. Each assignment is overruled.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

DUNKLIN, J., not sitting.
#### STONE v. STATE.

No. 16357.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 8, 1933.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft; punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record reaches this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. Ini such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ JERRY E. THOMPSON

Jerry E. Thompson
President and Chief Executive Officer
Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC, General PartnerMay 4, 2007
Exhibit 8.1



List of Subsidiaries



|Name of company                                          |  | Place of incorporation
        or establishment |  | Attributable equity interest held       
|-------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------
|Amira Nature Foods Ltd (“Amira Mauritius”)               |  | Mauritius                                       |  | 100% by ANFI                            
|                                                         |  |                                                 |  |                                         
|Amira Pure Foods Private Limited
        (“Amira India”) |  | India                                           |  | 80.4% by Amira Mauritius                
|                                                         |  |                                                 |  |                                         
|Amira I Grand Foods Inc.                                 |  | Delaware (United States)                        |  | 100% by Amira India                     
|                                                         |  |                                                 |  |                                         
|Amira Food Pte. Ltd.                                     |  | Singapore                                       |  | 100% by Amira India                     
|                                                         |  |                                                 |  |                                         
|Amira C Foods International DMCC                         |  | Dubai Multi Commodities Centre (UAE)            |  | 100% by Amira India                     
|                                                         |  |                                                 |  |                                         
|Amira Foods (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd                          |  | Malaysia                                        |  | 100% by Amira Food Pte. Ltd.            
|                                                         |  |                                                 |  |                                         
|Amira G Foods Limited                                    |  | United Kingdom                                  |  | 100% by Amira C Foods International DMCC
|                                                         |  |                                                 |  |                                         
|Amira Ten Nigeria Limited                                |  | Nigeria                                         |  | 100% by Amira C Foods International DMCC
Page 1 of 1 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE 

CoreLogic  Commercial  Real  Estate  Services,  Inc.  (the  "Asserting  Party"),  an  indirect  subsidiary  of CoreLogic, Inc, is responsible for assessing compliance as of December 31, 2012, and for the period from January 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicing criteria set  forth  in  Title  17,  Sections  229.1122(d)(1)(iv),  (d)(2)(v),  (d)(2)(vi),  (d)(2)(vii),  (d)(4)(xi),  (d)(4)(xii) and (d)(4)(xiii) of the Code of Federal Regulations applicable to the Asserting Party (the "Applicable Servicing  Criteria").  The  servicing  activities  covered  by  this  report  include  all  loans  for  commercial mortgage  loan  outsourcing  customers  for  which  the  Asserting  Party  served  as  the  commercial  tax service provider (the "Platform"). 

The  Asserting  Party  has  assessed  its  compliance  with  the  Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  for  the  Reporting Period  and  has  concluded  that  the  Asserting  Party  has  complied,  in  all  material  respects,  with  the Applicable Servicing  Criteria  as of December 31, 2012, and for the Reporting Period with respect to the Platform taken as a whole. 

PricewaterhouseCoopers  LLP,  an  independent  registered  public  accounting  firm,  has  issued  an attestation  report  on  the  assessment  of  compliance  with  the  Applicable  Servicing  Criteria  as  of December 31, 2012, and for the Reporting Period. 

CORELOGIC COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC. 

/s/ Vicki Chenault_ Vicki Chenault Senior Vice President February 6, 2013
# Official Journal C 235/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 235 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4929 September 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 235

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4929 September 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2006/C 235/1 | Special Report No 6/2006 concerning the environmental aspects of the Commission's development cooperation, together with the Commission's replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2006/C 235/1

Special Report No 6/2006 concerning the environmental aspects of the Commission's development cooperation, together with the Commission's replies

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Service Agreement – A

Formulation development of RHB-105 in oral solid dosage form and manufacture
of clinical supplies

Amendment 1







Exhibit 4.17



THE SYMBOL “[****]” DENOTES PLACES WHERE
PORTIONS OF THIS DOCUMENT HAVE BEEN OMITTED PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT. SUCH MATERIAL HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY
WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.



Amendment 1 to The service
Agreement Ais made and entered in August 17th, 2011 (the “Amendment”).



|1. |  | DESCRIPTION OF THE EXTRA WORK
|-- |  | -----------------------------

| |  | 
| |  | 

Approximately 1 g of [****] lot number [****] was received from [****]
[****] for supplier qualification.

A supplier qualification analysis will have to be performed and will
consist of verification of the results included in the certificate of analysis of the supplier. The following tests will be
performed on this lot:



| | 1. | IR (90$),
| | -- | ---------

| | 2. | Assay (130$),
| | -- | -------------

| | 3. | Impurities (190$)
| | -- | -----------------

| | 4. | Water content (85$).
| | -- | --------------------



|2. |  | COST AND PAYMENTS
|-- |  | -----------------

|2.1 |  | The cost of the Services for the Extra Work detailed
in section 1 is $495 USD.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2.2 |  | The Client shall pay to Corealis in United-States
currency ($USD) upon the reception of the invoice.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment
as of the Date written above, by their authorised representatives, who by signing confirm their authority and intention to bind
the Parties they represent.



|Corealis Pharma Inc.______  |  | 7810962 Canada Inc.               
|--------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|                            |  |                                   
|Per: /s/___________________ |  | Per: /s/ Alain Guimond PhD        
|                            |  |                                   
|Name: Yves Roy, Ph.D.       |  | Name: Alain Guimond PhD           
|                            |  |                                   
|Title: President            |  | Title: Senior director of Research
United States

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 07-310 Date: December 2007 

Subject: FEHBP Cost Factor for First Quarter of FY 2008 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program 

(FEHBP) for the first quarter of FY 2008. A quarterly cost factor will also be provided to you near the end of 

the second and third quarters of the fiscal year. The annual imputed cost factors for all civilian benefit 

programs will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2008. 

The FEHBP cost factor for the first quarter of FY 2008 is $1,272. 

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so we 

have a record of them. Additionally, you may contact us on 202-606-0606. 

Keith Willingham 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Center for Financial Services
Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 6



## ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I No. CR

- 16

- 614

TANNER BAXLEY

APPELLANT
V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS APPELLEE O PINION D ELIVERED : January 18, 2017
APPEAL FROM THE HOT SPRING COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [ NO. 30CR

- 12

- 262

- 1 ]
HONORABLE CHRIS E WILLIAMS , JUDGE AFFIRMED; MOTION TO WITHDRAW GRANTED

ROBERT J. GLADWIN , Judge On December 11, 2012, appellant Tanner Baxley was placed on five years’ supervised probation for the offense of theft by receiving, a Class C felony. He was ordered to pay $150 in court costs, a $1,000 fine, a $250 DNA fee, and $951.50 in supervision fees. On February 14, 2014, the State filed a petition to revoke Baxley’s probation. On June 24, 2014, an amended report of probation violation was filed alleging that Baxley had violated the following conditions: 1

- Laws, 2

- Alcohol/Controlled Substances, 6

- Rep orting, 7

- Employment and Residence, 13

- Supervision Fees, 14

- Restitution and 15

- Court Costs,
Fines , and DNA. At the hearing on the petition to revoke on April 12, 2016, Baxley admitted to each of the alleged violations. The trial court sentenced appellant t o ten years in the Arkansas Department of Correction.Cite as 2017 Ark. App.

2 This is a no

- merit appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4

- 3(k) (2016). On appeal, Baxley’s counsel argues that there are no meritorious gr ounds for appeal and asks to withdraw as counsel. The clerk of
this court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s motion and brief to Baxley in accordance with
Rule 4

- 3(k)(2), informing him of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Baxley has not
filed pro se points. Because counsel has complied with the requirements of Rule 4

- 3(k), we grant the motion to withdraw and affirm. The test for filing a no

- merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but whether an appeal would be wholly frivolo us. Gaines v. State , 2014 Ark. App. 651. Based on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders , supra , and the requirements of Rule 4

- 3(k), we hold that Baxley’s appeal is wholly without merit. Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions , 16 Ark. App. 301, 700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel ’s motion to withdraw and affirming the circuit court’s revocation. Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.
H ARRISON and V AUGHT , JJ., agree. Gregory Crain , for appellant. No response.
Page 41 of 41



                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 (as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of
National Presto Industries, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify that the annual
report on Form 10-K of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Date:  March 24, 2003                  /S/ R. F. Lieble
                                       ----------------
                                       R. F. Lieble,
                                       Chief Financial Officer
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.Chief Executive Officer