alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-35.8
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of June 1, 2012, by and among RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate
Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC,
as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C7 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from June 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period June 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
file:///C|/Users/ACastill/Desktop/SaveAsText/(1)%2008262015%20-%20Thompson,%20Lisa%20-%20365.txt[8/26/2015 5:25:40 PM]

From: Christopher Benjamin <apostolicboylargo@yahoo.com>

Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 3:07 PM

To: OilandGas.Whitepapers

Subject: Propose methane emission standards

Dear Administrator McCarthy,

Thank you for considering new standards to control oil and gas industry methane emissions. In order to appropriately 

address the effects of climate change, we have to control methane emissions in addition to addressing carbon pollution 

from power plants.

Cutting methane leaks will also reduce emissions of dangerous toxins and particulate matter, stop waste, and conserve 

a valuable energy resource. Local communities and mineral owners benefit as well as the global climate.

I urge you to move forward on these rules.

Thank you,

Christopher Benjamin

13190 Washington Drive #B

Largo, FL 33774
p. 1 

# OAR Box 1490 Prepped hyCharmelle Mathews



## Document

Number: 

# 28 ) IV-C- 1 Docket Number: 

# A-94-5 2

Printed 8/4/200811:51:46

AM Sheet 28of 273P. 2

Keit h Barnett / 02/09/200 1 02:0 2 PM To : jschwtzr@gte.ne t cc : Subject : Reinforce d Plasti cCompsite s MACT Dea rJohn : I wa s reviewin g informatio n o n th e CF Awe b sit e concernin g th e MAC Tfo rreinforce d plastics . I note d tha t CFAstate s tha t VS R resin s canno tb e use d t o mee tMACT . Tha ti s no tcorrect . Yo u ca n us e VS R resins , bu t w e are no t goin g t o b e abl e t o publis h th e draf ttes tmetho d i n th e propose d rule . I assum e tha t becaus e EP Ai s silen to n th e issu e o fho wyo u determin e th e VS R tes t value s show n i n th e poin t valu e equations , tha tth e tes tmetho d woul d b e determine d b yth e permittin g authorit yo n a case-by-cas e basi s unti l w e publis h a tes tmethod . I fa facilit yha s t o mee t a case-by-cas e MAC Tprio rt o proposal , I assum e tha tthe ycoul d propos e t o us e th e CFAtes t metho d a s currentl ywritten , i fth e permittin g authorit yi s agreeable . Onc e ther e i s agreemen t o n ho wt o determin e th e VS R tes tvalu e show n i n th e curren tpoin tvalu e equations , i ti s simpl ya matte ro fpluggin g i n th e valu e t o th e appropriat e equation . Keit h Barnet t U . S . EP A Emissio n Standard s Divisio n M D - 1 3 Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 2771 1 barnett.keith@epa.go v 919-541-560 5

EP AAI R DOCKE

T
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Form 10-Q)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



|                      |  |                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/ David L. Calhoun                                 
|Date: August 16, 2007 |  | David L. Calhoun                                     
|                      |  | Chairman, Executive Board and Chief Executive Officer
|                      | 
|                      |  | /s/ Brian J. West                                    
|Date: August 16, 2007 |  | Brian J. West                                        
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer                              

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to The Nielsen Company B.V. and will be retained by The
Nielsen Company B.V. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Vivian Dixon, Plaintiff, *v.*410 Park Avenue Corp. et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 20, 1958.

*Lawrence Rosenthal*for plaintiff.

*Daniel Dolgerios*for defenants.

Samuel M. Gold, J.

In *Morris*v. *Flint & Bradley*(277 App. Div. 1025, affg. 99 N. Y. S. 2d 126), the plaintiff tenant was *768willing to surrender possession in the event that his agreement to do so was upheld as valid. He did not take the position that the agreement was illegal and that he therefore could not be compelled to vacate. The holding was, nevertheless, that the agreement was void and unenforcible. That decision is controlling here, notwithstanding the fact that the present plaintiff actually vacated the premises. The illegal agreement could not be made legal by plaintiff’s performance thereof. The plaintiff’s contention that the provisions of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations, forbidding a waiver by a tenant, were for the benefit of tenants and, therefore, may be waived by tenants is not without considerable force. Unfortunately, however, the decision in *Morris*v. *Flint & Bradley (supra)*refusing to permit the tenant in that case to enforce the landlord’s agreement, requires the dismissal of the present complaint.

Motion granted.
##### 



Exhibit 99.2
 (HORIZON LOGO)
    
    
    
    2500 CityWest Boulevard
Suite 2200
Houston, TX 77042-3097
(713) 361-2600
(713) 361-2690 fax
 Contact:FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    
    Ronald D. MogelChief Financial OfficerJune 12, 2007
    
    (713) 243-2753
 Horizon Offshore Agrees to be Acquired
by Cal Dive International
   About Horizon Offshore




---



##### 



Cautionary Statement on Forward-Looking Statements
    Additional Information




---



##### 



Participants in the Solicitation
EXHIBIT 32.1





STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Stanley
A. Hirschman, Principal Executive Officer of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 28, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Stanley A
      Hirschman.Stanley
      A. Hirschman, Principal Executive OfficerDated:
      January 12, 2010
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22704]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 397 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-757, K2024-50.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22704 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
FELIX LONGORIA JR Appellant
VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS Appellee IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
§ § 

### § § 

## case no. PD-llgQHRHjFCRIBIBNALAPPEALS MAR 112015 AbelAcosta,Clerk
APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT: Comes now, Felix Longoria Jr./ in the above-styled and num 

### bered case; proceeds pro-se/ and moves this Honorable Court under ^ 

## and pursuant to the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure/ R»jlia-iie|.2 

## requesting appellant's motion for stay of mandatePQyPT^fp^fe/HNALAPPEALS thereof, the appellant will show the following: MAR 112015 AbelAcosta,Clerk This Court has subject-matter jurisdiction under the rules of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure to hear this motion.
II. On February 25/2015/ this Honorable Court sent to the app ellant the clerk's card showing that the Motion for Rehearing is denied. Appellant received this card not until March 2,2015 and now has had opportunity to perfect this motion in order to file his Petition to the United States Supreme Court on Certiorari and based upon conflicting matters . III. Appellant/ involks his procedural process in order to fully show that he has been denied review of certain substantial rights and seeks review for redress. - 1 -IV. CONCLUSION AND PRAYER 

### Appellant, asks that and prayes this motion for stay of man date is granted in all things by this Honorable Court of Criminal Appeals. 

# SignedandDatedon this the fa of /tfji\(L-/L ,2015 Respectfully Submitted, 

### <fli60<Utfjcu 

### Felix Longoria Jr., Appellant-Pro Se TDCJ-ID#1922018 @1100F.M.M. 655 Ramsey Rosharon, Texas 77583 CERTIFICATE OF Service 

## mQ&^-^j£)-A• ,certifythat theforegoingMotion is sentbypostalmail service to the State Prosecuting Attorney's office Lisa C McMinn-P.O.Box 13046 in Austin, Texas 78711.

- 2 -
Appendix 4

- 1: 2002 Oklahoma Emissions Inventory

The 2002 Oklahoma Emissions Inventory is available online at ftp://ftp.deq.state.ok.us/AQD/Regional_haze_emissions/Appendix 4

- 2: Technical Support Document for CENRAP Emissions and

Air Quality Modeling to Support Regional Haze State Implementation Plans

To access this document, please go to http://www.cenrap.org/html/projects.p hp

. Scroll down to “Completed Technical Support Document.” Below this is “12 Sept 2007 Text” and to the right of this is a link to download the document in .pdf format.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE03546

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Exhibit 12.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER UNDER SECTION 302

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Dror Ben-Asher, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Annual Report on Form 20-F of RedHill Biopharma Ltd.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

|                                                           |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date: May 15, 2019                                             |   |
|                                                           |   |
| /s/ Dror Ben-Asher                                             |   |
| Dror Ben-Asher                                                 |   |
| Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |   |

 

----
Page 42 of 46









EXHIBIT 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our reports
dated March 10, 2006 accompanying the consolidated financial statements and
schedule, and managements assessment of internal control over financial
reporting. Both reports are included in the annual report of National Presto
Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2005. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said reports in
the Registration Statement of National Presto Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries
on Form S-8 (File No. 33-46711, effective March 27, 1992).





/S/ Grant Thornton LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota

March 10, 2006





---
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: November 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/ James P. DolanJames P. DolanChairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report
of China Infrastructure Investment Corp. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:
  1.The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
  2.The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operation of the Company.
  Date:November 13, 2009
 
 /s/   Xue
      YingName:
      Xue YingTitle:
      Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer
                Secretary
      and Director




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
[Nos. 46265-2-I; 46638-1-I.

Division One.

October 23, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. Richard C. Rodolf, *Respondent. In the Matter of the Postsentence Petition*of Richard C. Rodolf, *Petitioner.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 99-1-01791-5, Carol A. Schapira, J., entered February 22, 2000, together with a petition for postsentencing review. Judgement and petition *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3523 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3523

  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration 
 employees to receive public safety officers' death benefits, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2015

Ms. Brownley of California (for herself, Ms. Edwards, Mrs. Napolitano, 
 Ms. Titus, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. Richmond, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. 
Cartwright, Mrs. Bustos, Ms. Norton, Mr. Vargas, Ms. Eshoo, Mr. Meeks, 
   Mr. Thompson of California, Ms. Jackson Lee, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. 
  Thompson of Mississippi, Mr. Johnson of Georgia, Mr. Hinojosa, Mr. 
 Tonko, Ms. Maxine Waters of California, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Honda, Mr. 
     McGovern, Mr. Kilmer, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Capuano, Ms. Clark of 
 Massachusetts, Ms. Kuster, Mr. McNerney, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Ms. Roybal-
Allard, Ms. Hahn, and Mr. Keating) introduced the following bill; which 
             was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to 
 provide for the eligibility of Transportation Security Administration 
 employees to receive public safety officers' death benefits, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Our Fallen TSA Officers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION EMPLOYEES ELIGIBLE TO 
              RECEIVE PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS' DEATH BENEFITS.

    Section 1204(9) of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act 
of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b(9)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period at the end 
        and inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
                    ``(E) an employee of the Transportation Security 
                Administration who is performing official duties of the 
                Administration, if those official duties are related to 
                protecting the Nation's transportation systems to 
                ensure freedom of movement for people and commerce.''.

SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall take effect as 
if they had been enacted on October 31, 2013.
                                 <all>
```
#### Berkshire Fine Spinning Associates, Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*City of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, New York County,

October 21, 1957.

*Truman Henson*and *J. Arthur Bowen*for plaintiff.

*606
      *Peter Campbell Brown, Corporation Counsel (Stanley Buchsbaum, Bernard H. Sherris*and *John J. Lyden*of counsel), for defendants.

Benedict D. Dinebn, J.

Plaintiff moves for summary judgment to declare that the General Business and Financial Tax Laws of the City of New York (Admisistrative Code of City of New York, § RR41-1.0 *et seq.)*§ B46-1.0 *et seq.)*do not apply to the plaintiff and that if the said laws do apply the same are unconstitutional. Plaintiff is a Massachusetts corporation engaged in manufacturing textile piece goods and curtains and sells at wholesale. It is authorized to do business in the State of New York and maintains two offices in the city of New York. Working out of these offices are three vice-presidents, a clerical staff and salesmen totaling approximately 95 employees. These officers and employees are engaged in such activities within the city of New York by reason of which the defendants claim makes them subject to be taxed at least in part. The manufacturing processes, packing and shipping are all performed outside the State. The local activities, though numerous and varied, form an integral part of the plaintiff’s business. Such activities are not separate and distinct and are related to the interstate business carried on by the plaintiff and cannot be isolated from such business. The activities are incidental and related to the interstate operations of the plaintiff and as such are not subject to local taxation even if orders for goods to be shipped from outside the State are obtained *(Matter of United Piece Dye Works*v. *Joseph,*282 App. Div. 60). The authorities cited in the briefs submitted lead to the conclusion that none of the activities engaged in by the plaintiff can be characterized as local in nature so as to be taxed by the defendants, but are component parts of interstate commerce. Such conclusion obviates the necessity to consider the allocation formula as applied to the plaintiff. However, there remains a further question as to the amount sought to be recovered by the plaintiff. Payments were made for the years 1947 to 1951, inclusive. Payments for the years 1949 and 1950 were made without any reservation or protest. Such amounts cannot be recovered, having been made voluntarily and knowledgeably *(Mercury Mach. Importing Corp.*v. *City of New York,*1 A D 2d 337). Motion granted in accordance herewith.

Settle order.