alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### William Green, Doing Business as Green Construction Company, Plaintiff, *v.*Philip Lassman et al., Individually and as Copartners Trading under the Name of Lassman Decorating Co., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

February 7, 1957.

*765• *Emanuel Tacher*for plaintiff.

*Murray H. Gordon*for defendants.

Felix 0. Benvenga, J.

Defendants Lassman and Lassman Co. move, pursuant to rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice for a dismissal of the first and second cause of action upon the defense of discharge in bankruptcy.

That the debts are dischargeable is not denied. That plaintiff had timely notice and actual knowledge of the bankruptcy proceedings, but failed and neglected to file his claims is admitted. Under the circumstances, the .debts are not exempt from discharge (U. S. Code, tit. 11, § 35; *Shapiro*v. *Lubasch,*186 Misc. 182, 183).

Concededly, plaintiff was not listed as a creditor, but as a debtor. Defendants assert that the failure to list plaintiff as a creditor was due to their belief that they had performed their contract, so far as plaintiff permitted performance, and in the belief that plaintiff was, in fact, indebted to them. Plaintiff contends that the failure to list him as a creditor was fraudulent. However, he raises no cognizable issue of fraud, and the elements of fraud are wholly lacking.

The intentional withholding of a name from the list of creditors in the belief that the bankrupt is not a debtor, but a creditor, is not a fraud. If plaintiff considered himself a creditor, it was his duty, having notice and actual knowledge of the bankruptcy proceedings, to file his claims. His failure to do so does not excuse him, nor does it render his claims exempt from discharge.

The case of *Poillon*v. *Lawrence*(77 N. Y. 207), upon which plaintiff relies, is not in point. There, the debtor changed his name prior to the bankruptcy, and the change of name and the use of the new name was intended to withhold notice and knowledge from the creditor, and thus deceive him. The circumstances were sufficient to constitute fraud. Here, plaintiff was listed as debtor and such listing was calculated to and did bring notice and knowledge to plaintiff. Moreover, plaintiff concededly had notice or knowledge of the bankruptcy. He *766had ample opportunity to file his claims and change his position as a claimed debtor into a creditor, but failed to do so. The defense is thus established; there is no triable issue of fact.

The motion for partial summary judgment is therefore granted.

Settle order.
Report
ofIndependent
Registered
PublicAccounting
Firm





To the Board of Managers and
Member of Grandbridge Real Estate Capital LLC:



We have examined management’s
assertion, included in the accompanying “Report on Assessment of Compliance with Regulation AB Servicing Criteria,"
that Grandbridge Real Estate Capital LLC (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria applicable to it as set forth in Item
1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation AB for asset-backed transactions specified in Appendix B thereto
(the Platform), as of December 31, 2012 and for the year then ended, excluding criteria 1122(d)(1)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(i), 1122(d)(3)(ii),
1122(d)(3)(iii), 1122(d)(3)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(vii) and 1122 (d)(4)(xv) which the Company has determined are not applicable to the
activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform. Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.



Our examination was
conducted in accordance with attestation standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly,
included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of selected
asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of selected servicing activities related to the Platform,
and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance
with the applicable servicing criteria. Our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed
by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to detect noncompliance arising from
errors that may have occurred prior to or subsequent to out tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or
reported by the Company during the period covered by this report. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.



In our opinion, management’s
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned applicable servicing criteria as of and for the year December 31,
2012 for the Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.





February 14, 2013
EXHIBIT  32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of ENHANCE SKIN PRODUCTS INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant  to 18
U.S.C. 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Brian LukianDate: December 14, 2009

Brian LukianChief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Form 10-Q) of The Nielsen Company B.V. fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ David L. Calhoun                                 
|Date: April 28, 2011 |  | David L. Calhoun                                     
|                     |  | Chairman, Executive Board and Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | /s/ Brian J. West      
|Date: April 28, 2011 |  | Brian J. West          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23
- 1321

ALLISON BLANCHARD , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. T.S. Ellis, III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:21

- cv - 00649

- TSE

- IDD )

Submitted : November 16 , 2023 Decided: November 21, 2023

Before AGEE and RICHARDSON , Circuit Judges , and FLOYD , Senior Circuit Judge

.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Kristen J. Farr, THE SPIGGLE LAW FIRM, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Heather K. Bardot, MCGAVIN, BOYCE, BARDOT, THORSEN & KATZ, P.C., Fairfax, Virginia; Virginia M. Sadler, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Arlington, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1321 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM: Allison Blanchard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary judgment on Blanchard’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e

- 17 ; the American with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213 ; and the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court ’s order

. Blanchard v. Arlington Cnty., Va

. , No.
1:21

- cv - 00649

- TSE

- IDD ( E.D. Va

. Feb. 24, 2023 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1321 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
NO. 07-09-00378-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL A

JUNE 18, 2010

EDWIN D. SEWARD, JR., APPELLANT

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 FROM THE 137TH DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2008-421,445; HONORABLE CECIL G. PURYEAR, JUDGE

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

**MEMORANDUM OPINION**

Appellant, Edwin D. Seward, Jr., was indicted on two counts of arson.  Prior to trial, appellant and his trial counsel advised the trial court that appellant would enter a plea of guilty without any recommendation as to punishment.  After admonishing appellant, the trial court proceeded to hear the evidence regarding punishment.  Appellant was found guilty of arson and sentenced to serve 20 years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice.  It is from this judgment that appellant appeals.  We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

Appellants attorney has filed an Anders brief and a motion to withdraw.  Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed. 2d 498 (1967).  In support of his motion to withdraw, counsel certifies that he has diligently reviewed the record, and in his opinion, the record reflects no reversible error upon which an appeal can be predicated.  Id. at 744-45.  In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), counsel has candidly discussed why, under the controlling authorities, there is no error in the trial courts judgment.  Additionally, counsel has certified that he has provided appellant a copy of the Anders brief and motion to withdraw and appropriately advised appellant of his right to file a *pro se* response in this matter.  Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 510 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991).  The court has also advised appellant of his right to file a *pro se* response.  Appellant has not filed a response.

By his Anders brief, counsel raised three grounds that could possibly support an appeal, but concludes the appeal is frivolous.  We have reviewed these grounds and made an independent review of the entire record to determine whether there are any arguable grounds which might support an appeal.  SeePenson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005).  We have found no such arguable grounds and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous.

Accordingly, counsels motion to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial courts judgment is affirmed.[footnoteRef:1] [1:  Counsel shall, within five days after this opinion is handed down, send his client a copy of the opinion and judgment, along with notification of appellants right to file a pro se petition for discretionary review.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 48.4.] 

			Mackey K. Hancock

Justice

Do not publish.

2
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):
    
    March 29, 2007
 Kraton Polymers LLC
  Delaware
    
    333-123747
    
    94-2805249(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission
    
    (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)incorporation)
    
    File Number)
 15710 John F. Kennedy Blvd.,
Suite 300
    
    77032Houston, Texas(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code:
    
    281-504-4700
  
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 7.01 Regulation FD DisclosureItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESPresentation    Table of Contents  
 Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  Kraton Polymers LLCMarch 29, 2007
    By:

/s/
Nicholas G. DekkerName:
    Nicholas G. DekkerTitle:
    Vice President andChief
Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit
    
    Description of Exhibit99.1
    
    Presentation dated March 29,
2007.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3518 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the use of amounts 

from the Asset Forfeiture Fund for the Domestic Cannabis Suppression/ 

Eradication Program of the Drug Enforcement Administration, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 

Mr. TED LIEU of California (for himself and Mr. AMASH) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 28, United States Code, to prohibit the use 

of amounts from the Asset Forfeiture Fund for the Domestic Cannabis Suppression/Eradication Program of the 

Drug Enforcement Administration, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stop Civil Asset For5 feiture Funding for Marijuana Suppression Act of 2015’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3518 IH

1 SEC. 2. RESTRICTION ON USE OF THE ASSET FORFEITURE 

2 FUND FOR THE DOMESTIC CANNABIS SUP3 PRESSION/ERADICATION PROGRAM. 

4 Section 524 of title 28, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(e) Notwithstanding subsection (c) of this section, 

7 beginning in fiscal year 2015, and for each fiscal year 

8 thereafter, no amounts in the Fund may be used for the 

9 Domestic Cannabis Suppression/Eradication Program of 

10 the Drug Enforcement Administration, or any substan11 tially similar program.’’. 

12 SEC. 3. NO AUTHORITY TO TRANSFER PROPERTY FOR PUR13 POSES OF THE DOMESTIC CANNABIS SUP14 PRESSION/ERADICATION PROGRAM. 

15 Notwithstanding section 981(e) of title 18, United 

16 States Code, no property may be transferred to a Federal 

17 agency or a State and local agency, if that property is 

18 used for any purpose pertaining to the Domestic Cannabis 

19 Suppression/Eradication Program of the Drug Enforce20 ment Administration, or any substantially similar pro21 gram. 

22 SEC. 4. SENSE OF CONGRESS. 

23 It is the sense of Congress that the Drug Enforce24 ment Administration (DEA) expends a large amount of 

25 resources on enforcing prohibitions on marijuana. The 

26 DEA administrator’s comments about the relative harm 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3518 IH

1 of marijuana support Congress’s belief that the DEA’s 

2 marijuana prohibition policy is an inappropriate use of re3 sources. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United StatesOffice ofPersonnel ManagementThe Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance ServicePayroll Office Letter

                                                  Number: P-00–33                                                         Date : November 16, 2000

SUBJECT:  HB-PC  -  ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT

The Internal Revenue Code requires that cafeteria plans must file an annual informationreturn on the Form 5500 – Annual Return/Report of Employee Benefit Plan – with anattached Schedule F – Fringe Benefit Plan Annual Information Return.  To fulfill ourForm 5500 reporting responsibilities as the administrator of Health Benefits PremiumConversion (HB-PC), we will need input from all agencies of the Executive Branch ofthe Federal government, that have participating employees. 

Our Form 5500 submission for tax year 2000 will be based on the information thatExecutive Branch agencies provide to us on the attached Input for Form 5500.  As ourForm 5500 for tax year 2000 must be submitted by July 31, 2001, we will need you tocomplete the Input for Form 5500 and fax it back to us no later than June 1, 2001.  Ourfax number is 202-606-7944.

If you perform payroll cross-servicing functions, you must include on the Input for Form5500 the required information for your own agency as well as for all of your clientExecutive Branch agencies.  Likewise, if your payroll functions are cross-serviced, youwill not submit an Input for Form 5500.

The requirement to submit an Input for Form 5500 does not apply to agencies outsideof the Executive Branch.  If your agency has adopted HB-PC for the benefit of itsemployees, but is not part of the Executive Branch, it must file its own, separate Form5500.

If you have any questions about the matters discussed in this letter, email them to usat finance@opm.gov, or you may call us on (202) 606-0606.  

Robert A. Yuran, ChiefFinancial Policy StaffRetirement and Insurance Service

Attachment

mailto:finance@opm.gov
**Exhibit 99.1****WCA Waste Corporation Sets Date for Annual Meeting**Houston, Texas (June 20, 2007)—WCA Waste Corporation (NASDAQ:WCAA) announced today that the2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held on Thursday, September 13, 2007 at 9:00 a.m. localtime at the offices of WCA at One Riverway, Suite 1400, Houston, Texas 77056. The Corporation hasfixed the close of business on July 16, 2007 as the record date for the determination of thestockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.WCA Waste Corporation is an integrated company engaged in the transportation, processing anddisposal of non-hazardous solid waste. The Company’s operations consists of twenty landfills,twenty-one transfer stations/material recovery facilities and twenty-five collection operationslocated throughout Alabama, Arkansas, Colorado, Florida, Kansas, Missouri, New Mexico, NorthCarolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Texas. The Company’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQNational Market System under the symbol “WCAA.”   Contact: WCA Waste Corporation (NASDAQ: WCAA)  Houston, Texas  Tommy Fatjo, 713-292-2400
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Duff & Phelps Corporation, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Noah Gottdiener, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      for the periods presented therein.





Date:
      October 28, 2010
                /s/
      Noah GottdienerNOAH
      GOTTDIENERChairman
      of the Board andChief
      Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) and Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned does hereby certify that:

The Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the Form 10-Q) of the Company fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act and information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                                                      
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | /s/ David L. Calhoun                                 
|Date: April 29, 2010 |  | David L. Calhoun                                     
|                     |  | Chairman, Executive Board and Chief Executive Officer



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|                     |  | /s/ Brian J. West      
|Date: April 29, 2010 |  | Brian J. West          
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer
II 

Calendar No. 493 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3274 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 2, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

MAY 25, 2016 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4567 Rockbridge Road in Pine Lake, Georgia, 

as the ‘‘Francis Manuel Ortega Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FRANCIS MANUEL ORTEGA POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 4567 Rockbridge Road in Pine 

6 Lake, Georgia, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Francis Manuel Ortega Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3274 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Francis Manuel Or5 tega Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 493 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3274 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Posttega Post Office’’. Pine Lake, Georgia, as the ‘‘Francis Manuel Or- al Service located at 4567 Rockbridge Road in 

MAY 25, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS