alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**I, Boris Svetlichny, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Golden Telecom, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonableassurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by the report based on such evaluation;and(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 9, 2007/s/ BORIS SVETLICHNY                    Boris Svetlichny
# Official Journal C 261/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 261 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6310 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 261

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6310 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 261/01 | Euro exchange rates — 7 August 2020 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 261/01

Euro exchange rates — 7 August 2020

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 261/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9877 – Pro Diagnostic Group/FutureLife/DISCARE CZ JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2020/C 261/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9912 — Genstar/TA/Brinker) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2020/C 261/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9877 – Pro Diagnostic Group/FutureLife/DISCARE CZ JV) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2020/C 261/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.9912 — Genstar/TA/Brinker) Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION

I, W. W. Boisture, Jr., principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. W. Boisture, Jr.                     
|W. W. Boisture, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)               

November 9, 2010
Exhibit 32  CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Diane Button, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:  (1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78 o(d)); and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 5, 2011  /s/ Diane Button Diane Button President and Chief Executive Officer Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 
 PURSUANT TO
 
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Dennis Irwin, as Chief Financial Officer of Best Energy Services, Inc., certify, pursuant to and solely for the purpose of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:
 
 (1) The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”), which this statement accompanies, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of best Energy Services, Inc. as of the .
 
 /s/ Dennis IrwinDennis IrwinChief Financial OfficerMay 17, 2010
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 DATE OF REPORT: August 8, 2007  (Date of earliest event reported)
 POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 Delaware
    
    001-12488
    
    88-0106100(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)8550 Mosley DriveHouston, Texas(Address of Principal 
Executive Offices)
    
    
    
    77075-1180(Zip Code)
 (713) 944-6900  (Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
 N/A  (Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02  Results of Operations and Financial Condition
  Item 9.01  Exhibits
  (c)      Exhibits:
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release dated August 8, 2007




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  POWELL INDUSTRIES, INC.Date:  August 21, 2007
    By:
    /s/ DON R. MADISONDon R. MadisonExecutive Vice President
Chief Financial & Administrative Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release dated August 8, 2007
#### Ralph Garcia, Plaintiff, *v.*Helen Ramos, Defendant.

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of The Bronx,

March 13, 1958.

*Julius Elkin*for plaintiff.

*Max Greenberger*for defendant.

Arthur Wachtel, J.

I hereby find and decide that plaintiff is entitled to judgment for treble damages in the amount of $468.60, plus $100 counsel fees. The court is convinced that the defendant’s violation was not willful. However, plaintiff is entitled to treble damages if the violation was the *1 ‘*result of defendant’s failure to take practicable precautions ” against the occurrence of the violation (State Residential Rent Law, § 11, subd. 5; L. 1946, ch. 274, as amd.). Upon this issue, defendant has the burden of proving that the violation was not the result of her failure to take practicable precautions against the occurrences of the violation (§ 11, subd. 5). Merely to “ assume,” as defendant did, that the superintendent would take care of the registration of the rents, and then receive excessive rent for the period alleged, namely, from November, 1955 to August, 1957 without any attempt to verify the maximum rent since defendant took title 11 years ago, even though the rent was increased to $39.15 on a hardship application of the landlord on January 8, 1952, is not, in the opinion of this court, sufficient to sustain defendant’s burden of proof. To hold otherwise would make a mockery of the prohibition against excessive rentals and permit the evasion thereof indirectly, despite the mandatory provisions of section 62 of the State Rent and Eviction Regulations to the contrary.

I order and adjudge that said plaintiff have judgment accordingly. Five days’ stay of execution.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1943

RONNIE MONK,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

PATRICK R. DONAHOE, Postmaster General, United States Postal 

Service,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Newport News. Mark S. Davis, District 

Judge. (4:09-cv-00073-MSD-DEM)

Submitted: December 21, 2010 Decided: January 13, 2011

Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Monk, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Elston, Litigation 

Counsel, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Washington, D.C.; George 

Maralan Kelley, III, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Monk appeals the district court’s order 

granting summary judgment in favor of the Postmaster General of 

the United States Postal Service on Monk’s employment 

discrimination claims, brought pursuant to Title VII of the 

Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 

2000e-17 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find that the 

district court did not commit reversible error when it granted 

summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s 

order.*

 See Monk v. Potter, No. 4:09-cv-00073-MSD-DEM (E.D. Va. 

June 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

 * Because a litigant in a civil action has no constitutional 

or statutory right to effective assistance of counsel, 

Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv., 785 F.2d 126, 127 (5th 

Cir. 1986), we decline to consider Monk’s claim of ineffective 

assistance of counsel. We also reject Monk’s claim that the 

Postal Service violated its own procedural rules when it 

disciplined him for tardiness, unauthorized overtime, and 

unauthorized leave because Monk raises the claim for the first 

time on appeal. See Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th 

Cir. 1993).
Exhibit 99.1




Annual Servicer’s Certificate


Provided by Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation


to Holders of Notes and Certificates









NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION




OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE




The undersigned, Michael J. McConnell, Vice President of NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation (the “Company”), does hereby certify, in his capacity as such corporate officer, as follows:
  (1)           The undersigned has caused a review, under his supervision, to be made of i) the activities; and ii) the performance under the Agreement (as defined below), of the Company during the 12-month period ended March 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”); and
  (2)           To the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, based upon such review, the Company has fulfilled its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.
  This Officer’s Certificate is being furnished pursuant to Section 4.09(a) of that certain Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2012 (the “Agreement”), by and among the Company, in its individual capacity and as servicer, Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II, as seller, and Nissan Auto Receivables 2012-B Owner Trust.
  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have set my hand effective as of the 15th day of June, 2016.


/s/Michael J. McConnell________________


Michael J. McConnell


Vice President
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano 

Richard H. Bernstein

Joan L. Larsen, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 January 5, 2017

d1212

Order 

Clerk

January 5, 2017

154079

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 154079

COA: 332600

Calhoun CC: 2009-002989-FC

PARIS DERON PALMER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 6, 2016 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to 

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
' ^ ^ 

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

AERO WAYS, INC., 

Complainant, 

V. 

DELAWARE RIVER & BAY AUTHORITY, 

Respondent. 

FAA Docket No. 16-09-12 

RESPONDENT DELAWARE RIVER & BAY AUTHORITY'S 

SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 

TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT 

Designation of persons to receive service for the Delaware River & Bay Authority. 

R. Judson Scaggs, Jr. 

Leslie A. Polizoti 

Pauletta J. Brown 

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP 

1201 N. Market Street 

P.O. Box 1347 

Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1347 

rscaggs@mnat.com 

lpolizoti@mnat.com ' 

pbrown@mnat.com 

Telephone: (302) 658-9200 

CD 

' ;C.O 

-a 

- a 

CD 

)•••, ; 
1. Respondent Delaware River & Bay Authority (the "DRBA") moves, 

pursuant to 14 C.F.R. § 16.11, for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint in the abovecaptioned matter. This request for extension is unopposed by the Complainant, Aero Ways, Inc. 

2. The DRBA resi)ectfully requests an additional extension of the deadline 

for filing its response to the Complaint of three weeks, until February 3, 2010. 

3. On December 23, 2009, Counsel for Respondent, Leslie A. Polizoti, 

contacted Counsel for Complainant, Joseph Lamonaca, to request Complainant's consent to this 

motion. Counsel for Complainant indicated that Complainant has no objection to this extension. 

4. This extension is sought because the parties are engaging in settlement 

discussions that may resolve this action. 

5. The DRBA therefore respectfully requests that the FAA extend its time to 

fde a response to the Complaint until Wednesday, February 3, 2010. 

MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT 8c TUNNELL LLP 

/s/Leslie A. Polizoti 

R. Judson Scaggs, Jr. 

Leslie A. Polizoti 

Pauletta J. Brown 

1201 N. Market Street 

P.O. Box 1347 

Wilmington, Delaware 19899-1347 

Telephone: (302) 658-9200 

Attorneys for Respondent Delaware River & Bay 

Authority 

December 23, 2009 
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

The undersigned hereby certifies that on the 23rd day of December, 2009, she 

caused to be served the RESPONDENT DELAWARE RIVER & BAY AUTHORITY'S 

SECOND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE 

COMPLAINT on the following in the manner indicated: 

BY FEDERAL EXPRESS 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Attn: FAA Part 16 Airport Proceedings Docket, AGC-610 

Room 925 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Original and three copies 

Elizabeth Newman 

Airports Law Branch, AGC-610 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W., RM 923 

Washington, DC 20591 

One copy , 

BY EMAIL AND FIRST CLASS MAIL 

Joseph Michael Lamonaca, Esq. 

Attorney for Aero Ways, Inc. 

New Castle County Airport 

P.O. Box 10583 ' • ' ' 

Wilmington, DE 19850-0583 

Email: avlaw@prodigy.net 

One copy 

/s/Leslie A. Polizoti 

Leslie A. Polizoti
#### SCOGGINS v. STATE.

No. 15391.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1932.

Don Mirike and Harvey P. Shead, both of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*831HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, punishment being assessed at one year in the penitentiary.

_ The record is before this court without bills of exception or statement of facts. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael J. Barrist, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCO Group, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) intentionallyomitted; 

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: August 12, 2008 

/s/Michael J. Barrist

Michael J. Barrist 

Chief Executive Officer 

(Principal Executive Officer)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1111

MICHAEL KEITH RIVERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

AVIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INCORPORATED; EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION;

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Labor

and Industry; THE DEPARTMENT FOR RIGHTS OF

VIRGINIANS WITH DISABILITIES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge.

(CA-01-749-7)

Submitted: March 21, 2002 Decided: March 28, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Keith Rivers, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Davis Frith, FRITH,

ANDERSON & PEAKE, Roanoke, Virginia; Caren Ilene Friedman, EQUAL

EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Washington, D.C.; Catherine F.

Hutchins, Assistant Attorney General, John P. Josephs, Jr., OFFICE

OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for

Appellees.
2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Michael Keith Rivers appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint alleging a violation of the Americans with

Disabilities Act, see 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101-12213 (West 1995 & Supp.

2001), by his employer, Avis Construction, and negligence on the

part of the remaining Appellees in investigating his claims. We

have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of

the district court. See Rivers v. Avis Construction Co., CA-01-

749-1 (W.D. Va. Jan. 10, 2002). Additionally, we deny Rivers’

motions to subpoena all parties involved and for production of

documents. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED