Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 9, 2024 / Notices 81939 

the Secretary on what determination the 

Commission should reach in the 

reviews. Comments are due on or before 

5:15 p.m. on November 29, 2024, and 

may not contain new factual 

information. Any person that is neither 

a party to the five-year reviews nor an 

interested party may submit a brief 

written statement (which shall not 

contain any new factual information) 

pertinent to the reviews by November 

29, 2024. However, should the 

Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) 

extend the time limit for its completion 

of the final results of its reviews, the 

deadline for comments (which may not 

contain new factual information) on 

Commerce’s final results is three 

business days after the issuance of 

Commerce’s results. If comments 

contain business proprietary 

information (BPI), they must conform 

with the requirements of §§ 201.6, 

207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s 

rules. The Commission’s Handbook on 

Filing Procedures, available on the 

Commission’s website at https://

www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_

on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 

upon the Commission’s procedures with 

respect to filings. 

In accordance with §§ 201.16(c) and 

207.3 of the rules, each document filed 

by a party to the reviews must be served 

on all other parties to the reviews (as 

identified by either the public or BPI 

service list), and a certificate of service 

must be timely filed. The Secretary will 

not accept a document for filing without 

a certificate of service. 

Determination.—The Commission has 

determined these reviews are 

extraordinarily complicated and 

therefore has determined to exercise its 

authority to extend the review period by 

up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 

1675(c)(5)(B). 

Authority: These reviews are being 

conducted under authority of title VII of 

the Act; this notice is published 

pursuant to § 207.62 of the 

Commission’s rules. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 3, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23273 Filed 10–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1361] 

Certain Wi-Fi Routers, Wi-Fi Devices, 

Mesh Wi-Fi Network Devices, and 

Hardware and Software Components 

Thereof; Notice of a Commission 

Determination To Grant a Joint Motion 

To Terminate the Investigation Based 

on a Settlement Agreement; 

Termination of the Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that 

the U.S. International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has 

determined to grant a joint motion to 

terminate the investigation based on a 

settlement agreement. The investigation 

is terminated in its entirety. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Edward S. Jou, Esq., Office of the 

General Counsel, U.S. International 

Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 

Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 

205–3316. Copies of non-confidential 

documents filed in connection with this 

investigation may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General 

information concerning the Commission 

may also be obtained by accessing its 

internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. 

Hearing-impaired persons are advised 

that information on this matter can be 

obtained by contacting the 

Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 

205–1810. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Commission instituted this investigation 

on May 8, 2023, based on a complaint 

filed on behalf of Netgear Inc. of San 

Jose, California (‘‘Netgear’’). 88 FR 

29693–94 (May 8, 2023). The complaint 

alleged violations of section 337 of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 

U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain Wi-Fi routers, WiFi devices, mesh Wi-Fi network devices, 

and hardware and software components 

thereof by reason of infringement of 

certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 

7,936,714 (‘‘the ’714 patent’’); 

10,681,698 (‘‘the ’698 patent’’); 

10,278,179 (‘‘the ’179 patent’’); 

9,468,205; 10,327,242; and 10,356,681. 

The complaint further alleged that a 

domestic industry exists. The 

Commission’s notice of investigation 

named as respondents: TP-Link 

Technologies Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen, 

China; TP-Link Corporation Limited, f/ 

k/a TP-Link International Limited of 

Kowloon, Hong Kong; TP-Link USA 

Corporation of Irvine, California; and 

TP-Link Research Institute USA Corp. 

d/b/a TP-Link Research America Corp. 

of San Jose, California (collectively, 

‘‘TP-Link’’). The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations is not participating in this 

investigation. 

On May 30, 2024, the presiding 

administrative law judge issued a final 

initial determination finding a violation 

of section 337 with respect to claim 13 

of the ’714 patent and claims 12, 15, 17, 

and 19 of the ’698 patent, but no 

violation with respect to claim 11 of the 

’179 patent. 

On September 10, 2024, Netgear and 

TP-Link filed a joint motion to terminate 

the investigation based on a settlement 

agreement. On September 11, 2024, 

Netgear and TP-Link filed a public 

version of their joint motion to 

terminate, attaching a redacted version 

of their settlement agreement. 

The Commission has determined to 

grant the joint motion to terminate 

because it complies with the 

requirements of Commission Rule 

210.21(b) (19 CFR 210.21(b)). 

Specifically, the Commission finds that 

the joint motion includes confidential 

and public versions of the parties’ 

settlement agreement and a statement 

that ‘‘[o]ther than a stipulation regarding 

joint discovery cross-use in the 1405 

investigation and stipulations relating to 

procedural and discovery matters, 

importation and inventory, hearing 

procedures, and exhibits in this 

investigation,’’ there are no other 

agreements, written or oral, express or 

implied between the parties concerning 

the subject matter of the investigation. 

The Commission further finds that there 

are no extraordinary circumstances that 

would warrant denial of the requested 

termination, and termination would not 

be contrary to the public interest 

pursuant to Commission Rule 

210.50(b)(2) (19 CFR 210.50(b)(2)). The 

investigation is hereby terminated in its 

entirety. 

The Commission vote for this 

determination took place on October 3, 

2024. 

The authority for the Commission’s 

determination is contained in section 

337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 

210 of the Commission’s Rules of 

Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 

210). 

By order of the Commission. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
81940 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 196 / Wednesday, October 9, 2024 / Notices 

1The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 

CFR 207.2(f)). 

Issued: October 3, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23326 Filed 10–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 731–TA–1200 (Second 

Review)] 

Large Residential Washers From 

Mexico 

Determination 

On the basis of the record 1 developed 

in the subject five-year review, the 

United States International Trade 

Commission (‘‘Commission’’) 

determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 

1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that revocation of the 

antidumping duty order on large 

residential washers from Mexico would 

be likely to lead to continuation or 

recurrence of material injury to an 

industry in the United States within a 

reasonably foreseeable time. 

Background 

The Commission instituted this 

review on April 1, 2024 (89 FR 22455) 

and determined on July 5, 2024, that it 

would conduct an expedited review (89 

FR 67669, August 21, 2024). 

The Commission made this 

determination pursuant to section 

751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It 

completed and filed its determination in 

this review on October 4, 2024. The 

views of the Commission are contained 

in USITC Publication 5552 (October 

2024), entitled Large Residential 

Washers from Mexico: Investigation No. 

731–TA–1200 (Second Review). 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: October 4, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23379 Filed 10–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the Toxic 

Substances Control Act 

On September 30, 2024, the 

Department of Justice lodged a proposed 

Consent Decree (the ‘‘Consent Decree’’) 

with the District Court of the Southern 

District of New York in a lawsuit 

entitled United States of America v. 

Rose Demolition & Carting Inc., Civil 

Action No. 24–7375. 

In this action, the United States seeks, 

injunctive relief from Rose Demolition & 

Carting Inc., in connection with the 

defendant’s unlawful work practices 

during renovations governed by the 

Renovation, Repair, and Painting Rule, 

40 CFR part 745, a rule promulgated 

under Toxic Substances Control Act 

(‘‘TSCA’’). The proposed consent decree 

resolves the United States’ claims, 

requires Rose Demolition & Carting Inc. 

to pay a $100,000 penalty, and imposes 

injunctive relief. 

The publication of this notice opens 

the public comment on the proposed 

settlement. Comments should be 

addressed to the Assistant Attorney 

General, Environment and Natural 

Resources Division, and should refer to 

United States of America v. Rose 

Demolition & Carting Inc., DJ #90–5–1– 

1–11139. All comments must be 

submitted no later than 30 days after the 

publication date of this notice. 

Comments may be submitted either by 

email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By email ....... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Any comments submitted in writing 

may be examined and downloaded at 

this Justice Department website: https:// 

www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. 

If you require assistance accessing the 

Consent Decree, you may request 

assistance by email or by mail to the 

addresses provided above for submitting 

comments. 

Eric D. Albert, 

Assistant Section Chief, Environmental 

Enforcement Section, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division. 

[FR Doc. 2024–23034 Filed 10–8–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Notice of Lodging of Proposed 

Consent Decree Under the 

Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act 

On September 30, 2024, the 

Department of Justice lodged a proposed 

Consent Decree with the United States 

District Court for the District of New 

Jersey in the lawsuit entitled United 

States v. EMR (USA Holdings) Inc.; 

Camden Iron & Metal, Inc.; SPC 

Corporation; Atlas Traders, LLC; Rhino 

Recycling, Inc.; Delco Metals, Inc.; Tioga 

Real Estate, LLC; United Compressed 

Steel Company; Sims Group USA 

Holdings Corporation; Simsmetal East 

LLC f/k/a Hugo Neu Schnitzer East; 

Metal Management Northeast, Inc; and 

Mercer Group International of New 

Jersey, Inc., Civil Action No. 1:24–CV– 

09545–KMW–MJS. 

The proposed Consent Decree 

resolves the United States’ claims on 

behalf of the Environmental Protection 

Agency (‘‘EPA’’) under section 107(a) of 

the Comprehensive Environmental 

Response, Compensation, and Liability 

Act of 1980, as amended (‘‘CERCLA’’), 

regarding the Shamrock Enterprises 

Superfund Site (‘‘Site’’), located at 281 

Clearfield Avenue, Franklinville, 

Gloucester County, New Jersey, 

comprised of 4 lots collectively 

approximately 52 acres in size and 

identified as Block 1802, Lots 30, 31, 32, 

33 on the Tax Map of Franklin 

Township, New Jersey. EPA in 2018 

removed approximately 3000 

compressed gas cylinders containing 

hazardous substances such as acetylene, 

ethylene oxide, hydrogen chloride, 

hydrogen, sulfide, and silane 

accumulated at the Site. The United 

States incurred at least $1,516,119 in 

response costs at the Site. The settling 

defendants are generators who sent 

cylinders containing hazardous 

substances to the Site and will 

collectively pay $900,000.00 to resolve 

their liability. 

The publication of this notice opens 

a period for public comment on the 

proposed Consent Decree. Comments 

should be addressed to the Assistant 

Attorney General, Environment and 

Natural Resources Division, and should 

refer to United States v. EMR (USA 

Holdings) Inc., et al., D.J. Ref. No. 

Number 90–11–3–12494. All comments 

must be submitted no later than thirty 

(30) days after the publication date of 

this notice. Comments may be 

submitted either by email or by mail: 

To submit 

comments: Send them to: 

By e-mail ...... pubcomment-ees.enrd@

usdoj.gov. 

By mail ......... Assistant Attorney General, 

U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O. 

Box 7611, Washington, DC 

20044–7611. 

Any comments submitted in writing 

may be filed by the United States in 

whole or in part on the public court 

docket without notice to the commenter. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES