alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exh 10.5_CV






Exhibit 10.5




August 4, 2014


Ms. Catherine M. Vaczy
140 East 28th Street
#11C
New York, NY  10021
Dear Catherine:
This letter serves as an amendment to your employment agreement dated as of January 26, 2007 (the “2007 Agreement”), as thereafter amended by amendments on January 9, 2008, August 29, 2008,  reinstated and extended on July 8, 2009, amended and extended on July 7, 2010, amended and extended on January 6, 2012, amended and extended on  November 13, 2012, amended and extended on July 12, 2013 and further amended on March 11, 2014 (the 2007 Agreement as so amended and extended, the “Original Agreement”) with respect to your service to the Company as its General Counsel.  Except as set forth herein the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged.  This letter agreement shall   modify the Original Agreement with respect to those different and additional terms as follows.  The stock options granted to you  by the Company to date or to be granted to you by the Company in the future shall remain exercisable despite any termination of your employment for a period of not less than four years from the date of your termination of employment.  
Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Original Agreement.  Except as set forth herein the terms of the Original Agreement shall remain unchanged.                                      
NeoStem, Inc.
By: /s/ Robin L. Smith
Name:Robin L. Smith
Title:CEO
ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:
/s/ Catherine M. Vaczy
Catherine M. Vaczy
##### 



Re:
    
    Weatherford International, Inc. Registration Statement On Form S-4
  Issuer 2012 Exchange Notes 2017 Exchange Notes 2037 Exchange Notes Exchange Notes Guarantor Trustee Indenture Exchange Offer 2012 Outstanding Notes 2017 Outstanding Notes 2037 Outstanding Notes Outstanding Notes Registration Rights
Agreement Exchange Guarantees
 Securities Act




---



##### 



SEC Registration
Statement




---



#####
EX-35.6
(logo)WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, NA


CMBS Department
MAC N9401-011
1055 10th Avenue S.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55414

Wells Fargo Bank, NA
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045

RE: Annual Statement as to Compliance

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells
Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows for the calendar year 2012:

(a) a review of Wells Fargo's activities as Custodian under the servicing
agreement(s) listed on Schedule A hereto (the "Servicing Agreement(s)") has
been made under my supervision; and

(b) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review Wells Fargo has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement(s) in all material
respects throughout the reporting period.


March 25, 2013

/s/Kathleen Marshall
Kathleen Marshall
Vice President


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(page)

To: Wells Fargo Bank, NA

Schedule A

List of Servicing Agreement(s) and Series

1 Pooling and Servicing Agreement for COMM 2012-CCRE2 Commercial Mortgage
Pass-Through Certificates Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00010- CV
Christopher Roger s, Appellan t

v. Am y Roger s, Appellee

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 126 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -F M- 11- 0017 85, H ONO RAB LE SCO TT H . JENK INS, J UDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
The cler k’s rec ord in this appea l was due in this Court on J anuar y 29, 2013. On, J une 7, 2013, Christopher Roge rs was notified that no cler k’s rec ord had been filed due to his failure to pay or make arr ang ements to pay the district cler k’s fee for prepa

ring the cler

k’s record. The notice reque sted that Roge rs mak e ar ra ng ements for the cler k’s rec ord and submit a status repor t reg arding this appea l by J une 17, 2013. Roge rs has not filed a status repor t or otherwise responde d to this C ourt’s notice.

I f the trial court cler

k fails to f

ile the cler

k’s rec ord due to a

ppellant’s failure to pa

y
or make arr ang ements to pay the cler k’s fee for prepa

ring the rec ord, the appellate court may dismiss the appea l for want of pro s ec u tion unless the appellant was entitled to proce ed without pay ment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Be cause Roge rs has fa iled to pay or m ake arra ng ements to pay the cler k’s fe e for

prepa ringthe cler

k’s re cord, this appe al is dismis sed for want of pr osecution.__________________________________________ Bob Pembe rton, J ustice Be fore Chief J ustice Jones, J ustices Pemberton a nd Field Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: August 16, 2013

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6818

BARTO USRY,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant – Appellee,

and

DOUGLASS WILLIS, Unit Manager,

Party-in-Interest.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern 

District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, 

Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:11-cv-00141-FPS-JES)

Submitted: October 28, 2013 Decided: November 6, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barto Usry, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United 

States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barto Usry appeals the district court’s order 

rejecting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing 

his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for lack 

of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, Usry challenges the 

district court’s conclusion that his FTCA claim is barred by the 

discretionary function exception. See 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a) 

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible 

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the 

district court. Usry v. United States, No. 5:11-cv-00141-FPSJES (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

in the materials before this court and argument would not aid 

the decisional process. 

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32

OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended June 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                      
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Ronald O. Black                  
|                     |  |  |  | Ronald O. Black                      
|                     |  |  |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                     |  | 
|Date: August 8, 2008 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas W. Wayne                  
|                     |  |  |  | Thomas W. Wayne                      
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer              

*This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard
contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



Page 30
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 126 (Tuesday, July 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37273-37274]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15344]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE

Agricultural Research Service

Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive License

AGENCY: Agricultural Research Service, USDA.

ACTION: Notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Department of 
Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, intends to grant to Trellis 
Growing Systems LLC of Fort Wayne, Indiana, an exclusive license to 
U.S. Patent Application Serial No. 14/267,141, ``METHOD AND APPARATUS 
FOR PRIMOCANE MANAGEMENT'', filed on May 1, 2014.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 31, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to: USDA, ARS, Office of Technology Transfer, 
5601 Sunnyside Avenue, Rm. 4-1174, Beltsville, Maryland 20705-5131.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mojdeh Bahar of the Office of 
Technology Transfer at the Beltsville address given above; telephone: 
301-504-5989.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Government's patent rights in 
this invention are assigned to the United States of America, as 
represented by the Secretary of Agriculture. It is in the public 
interest to so license this invention as Trellis Growing Systems LLC of 
Fort Wayne, Indiana, has submitted a complete and sufficient 
application for a license. The prospective exclusive license will be 
royalty-bearing and will comply with the terms and conditions of 35 
U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7. The prospective exclusive license may be 
granted unless, within thirty (30) days from the date of this published 
Notice, the Agricultural Research Service receives written evidence and 
argument which establishes that the grant of the license would not be 
consistent with the

[[Page 37274]]

requirements of 35 U.S.C. 209 and 37 CFR 404.7.

Mojdeh Bahar,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2014-15344 Filed 6-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-03-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, Daniel H. Schulman, Chief Executive Officer of Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



|(1) | the report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2009 as amended on November 23, 2009 (the Report) fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
for the periods referred to in the Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ---------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 23, 2009 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel H. Schulman
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Daniel H. Schulman     
|                        |  |  |  |  |  |                        |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. and will be retained by
Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
DISMISS and Opinion Filed August 8, 2022 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00710-CV 

No. 05-22-00711-CV 

IN RE ALEJANDRINA LOPEZ, Relator 

Original Proceeding from the 301st Judicial District Court 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause Nos. DF-21-11690 and DF-22-04960 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Osborne, Partida-Kipness, and Smith 

Opinion by Justice Smith 

Relator Alejandrina Lopez petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus 

compelling the trial court to vacate her June 6, 2022 Order on Bill of Review and 

Motion for New Trial where the trial court granted a new trial and set aside a Final 

Decree of Divorce dated December 28, 2021. 

By order dated July 27, 2022, we informed relator that her petition and 

appendix in these proceedings contained unredacted sensitive information, including 

the minors’ names and birthdates, in violation of Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

9.9. See TEX. R. APP. P. 9.9. We struck relator’s petition and appendix and granted 

relator leave to re-file a petition and appendix that complied with rule 9.9 on or 
 –2– 

before August 3, 2022. We cautioned relator that a failure to re-file as permitted by 

our order might result in dismissal of this cause without further notice. 

On August 1, 2022, relator filed her Amended Petition for Writ of Mandamus 

and Brief in Support Thereof, which included an attached Appendix (together, 

Amended Petition) in these proceedings. Relator, however, failed to redact all 

sensitive information as ordered by the Court; the Amended Petition still contains 

instances where sensitive information remains unredacted, including the minors’ 

names. 

Accordingly, because relator has not filed a petition and appendix that 

complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.9 as ordered by this Court, we 

STRIKE relator’s Amended Petition and DISMISS these original proceedings. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c), 52.8(a). 

220710F.P05 

/Craig Smith/

CRAIG SMITH 

JUSTICE
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government's Human Resources Agency 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 11-306 Date: August 9, 2011 

Subject: September 2011 Headcount 

This is a reminder for you to submit your semiannual Headcount for the September 20 II reporting period. 

The Headcount is reported semiannually (March and September) by all payroll providers that withhold 

monies from salaries for participants in the Civil Service Retirement System, Federal Employees 

Retirement System, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and/or the Federal Employees Group 

Life Insurance Programs. 

The September 2011 Headcount will be for the payroll paid during the FIRST 15 DAYS of September. 

For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period will be August I, through August 31, 2011 and the 

Headcount report must be submitted no later than September 15, 2011. We ask that you notify us if you 

anticipate a delay or any difficulties in submitting it by that date. Under no circumstances, however, 

should you delay transmitting your normal Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) report 

because your Headcount is not ready to be submitted. 

Please FAX (using CLEAR, legible originals) your OPM Forms 1523 and SF 2812-A to us at 202-606­

070 I. If you prefer, you may email your forms to Yadira. Vega@opm. gov and 

Donna.Deemer@opm. gov . In addition. please mail the original forms to: U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management, Funds Management, P.O. Box 7125, Washington DC 20415. If you have any questions 

concerning the preparation of your Headcount report, please call Ms. Vega at 202-606-4842 or Ms. 

Deemer at 202-606-2026. 

William Joe, Chief 

Financial Reporting and Analysis 

Financial Services
#### In the Matter of Paradeen Realty Corporation, Petitioner, against A. B. C. Installation Electric Corporation, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

March 21, 1958.

*Herbert W. Newman*for petitioner.

*Elvin I. Unterman*for respondent.

*772Benedict D. Dineen, J.

This is an application to discharge a mechanic’s lien upon the approval of an undertaking submitted herewith. The lienor has no objections except that it seeks to protect its rights in the premises and expresses doubts whether the time within which to commence an action on the bond has expired. In connection therewith the lienor quotes section *37*of the Lien Law, the material part of which provides: “ The claimant in order to perfect his claim shall within the time prescribed in this chapter for the filing of a notice of lien, file a notice of claim in the office of the clerk of the county where such bond is filed.” Section 10 of the Lien Law provides that a notice of lien may be filed: ‘ *‘*within four months after the completion of the contract, or the final performance of the work, or the final furnishing of the materials ’ ’. In other words a notice of lien must be filed within four months of any of the happenings mentioned in section 10. It would follow that section *37*in referring to *“*the time prescribed in this chapter for the filing of a notice of lien” prescribes a four-month period from the date an order is made discharging the lien for the claimant to perfect its claim.

The motion is granted. Bond approved.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | **Corporate Trust Services**

  MAC R1204-010  9062 Old Annapolis Road  Columbia, MD 21045  Tel: 410 884 2000  Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Deutsche Mortgage & AssetReceiving Corporation

60 WALL ST

NEW YORK, New York 10005-2836

 

Re: Annual Statement ofCompliance for COMM 2012-CCRE2 Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates

 

Per the Pooling and ServicingAgreement dated as of August 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), theundersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., asCertificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies asfollows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2016 (the "ReportingPeriod"):

 

(a) A review of Wells Fargo'sactivities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under theAgreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

(b) To the best of suchofficer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of itsobligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout theReporting Period.

 

 

February 27, 2017

 

 

/s/Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | (logo) Together we’ll  go far |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------|
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00690-CR

NO. 03-13-00691-CR

Joe Cardona, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NOS. D-1-DC-10-202665-A & D-1-DC-10-202666

HONORABLE KAREN SAGE JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant Joe Cardona has filed a motion to dismiss these appeals. The motion is

signed by appellant and by his counsel in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2(a). We grant the motion and dismiss the appeals.

__________________________________________

Scott K. Field, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton, and Field

Dismissed on Appellant’s Motion

Filed: October 24, 2014

Do Not Publish
| 1. | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2011, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  November 21, 2011                                            |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                          |
| /s/ Henry Ender                                                               |
| Henry EnderPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer) |
#### DANNER v. STATE.

No. 18131.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1936.

Cunningham & Lipscomb and F. A. Dale, all of Bonham, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
  CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
  Company Form 10-Q Report
        
      Regulation S-K
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6898
JEROME E. CASSELL, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RONALD ANGELONE, D irector; JOHN JABE; G. L. BASS, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-95-684) Submitted: August 22, 1996 Decided: September 5, 1996 Before HALL, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerome E. Cassell, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1988) action for failure toobey the magistrate judge's order to submit evidence of administrative remedy exhaustion. We have reviewed the record and thedistrict court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cassell v. Angelone , No. CA95-684 (E.D. Va. May 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED