alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION OFPRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT

TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Qof Power Medical Interventions, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarter endedJune 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, Michael P. Whitman, the Presidentand Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1) the Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2) the information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
|                 |   | /s/ Michael P. Whitman                |
|----------------------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|                 |   | Michael P. Whitman                    |
|                 |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                 |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
|                 |   |
| August 14, 2008 |   |
|                      |        |                                       |  |  |  |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32
 
 GETFUGU, INC.
 
 CERTIFICATION
 PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION
1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
 UNITED STATES CODE)
 
 Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer ofGetFugu, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby certify with respect to
the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form10-Qfor the period endedMarch 31, 2009as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), to the best of the
undersigned’s knowledge that:
 
 (1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of  1934; and
 
 (2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 May 20,
2009/s/ BERNARD
      STOLARPrincipalExecutive Officerand Principal Financial
      Officer
#### TIPS v. BUTLER.

No. 3783.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Dec. 22, 1938.

J. O. Faith, of Karnes City, for appellant.

Stanley Kulawik, of Yorktown, • for ap-pellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

The appellant Tips brought this suit against the appellee'Butler to recover upon a note in the principal sum of $210, dated Septeriiber 23, 1932, due October 1, 1933, with interest at the rate of ten percent per -annum from date, containing the usual attorney’s fee clause of ten percent, which note was alleged to have been executed by Butler. Certain credits were admitted to have been made in 1933, reducing the amount due to $130.40, as of the date of the last payment made December 20, 1933. The defendant answered setting up certain payments amounting to $189.30. lie also undertook to plead non est factum, but his pleading is insufficient as such. The purport of the plea is simply that the note now presented to the Court is a copy bearing a signature in pencil which is not the way defendant signed his name to notes. On trial he admitted the execution of a'note in plaintiff’s favor as described in the petition, but said the note he executed was signed with fountain pen and not with pencil. The effect of his testimony, is an admission that he signed the note sued upon, but simply claimed he signed it with a pen instead of by pencil. A general verdict was returned in favor of the defendant and judgment rendered accordingly, from which the plaintiff appeals.

-According to the defendant’s own evidence the payments made by him upon the note amounted to $189.30, and the plaintiff in any event is entitled to recover the balance with interest and attorney’s fees due upon the note after allowing the .credits claimed by the defendant. The judgment is reversed and here rendered in favor of plaintiff for said balance. The credits will be allowed as of the dates alleged in the answer.

Reversed and rendered.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3472 

To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, commonly known 

as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the threshold dollar amount of contracts 

subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such provisions. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 10, 2015 

Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina (for himself, Mr. AMASH, Mrs. BLACKBURN, 

Mr. LAMBORN, Mr. MULVANEY, Mr. COLE, Mr. KING of Iowa, Mr. 

POMPEO, Mr. BUCK, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. CHABOT, 

Mr. SALMON, Mr. GROTHMAN, and Mr. BRAT) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the provisions of title 40, United States Code, 

commonly known as the Davis-Bacon Act, to raise the 

threshold dollar amount of contracts subject to the prevailing wage requirements of such provisions. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adjusting Davis-Bacon 

5 for Inflation Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3472 IH

1 SEC. 2. THRESHOLD OF CONTRACTS SUBJECT TO DAVIS2 BACON. 

3 Section 3142(a) of chapter 31 of title 40, United 

4 States Code is amended by striking ‘‘$2,000’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘$50,000’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF


CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350






In connection with this Quarterly Report of Henya Food Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry Ender, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certifies to the
best of his knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1.
Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.
The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Henya Food Corp.






Date: 18 September, 2009/s/ Henry EnderHenry Ender
Chief Executive Officer
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of

law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of 10th Cir. R. 36.3.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Filed 7/30/96 TENTH CIRCUIT

HENRY FLOYD BROWN,

Petitioner - Appellant, No. 96-6029

v. (W.D. Oklahoma) RON THOMPSON,

Respondent - Appellee. (D.C. No. CIV-95-426-M)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before ANDERSON , BARRETT , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. SeeFed. R. App. P. 34 (a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. This cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Henry Floyd Brown appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Brown contends that he is being illegally- 2 -

detained in federal custody because his 1968 federal sentence of twenty years for bank robbery and other crimes allegedly was to be concurrent with his existing life sentence for murder, imposed by the State of Kansas. He was paroled from the state sentence in 1991. Contrary to Brown’s contentions, the official record of his federal sentence specifies that it is consecutive to any state sentence. The judgment and commitment reads as follows:

It is ADJUDGED that the defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the Attorney General or his authorized representative for imprisonment for a period of twenty (20) years which sentence is to run consecutive to any sentence now being served and any sentence heretofor[e] imposed and to be served

. R. Vol. I, Tab 6, Gov’t Ex. 1 (emphasis added). Brown attempts to overcome this official document by casting doubts on its authenticity, citing to various allegedly contrary notations in administrative files, an FBI report, documents from Kansas state officials, and by claiming that he remembers the judge saying something else from the bench. None of these conclusory and collateral arguments overcome the plain language of the judgment and commitment or provide any legitimate basis to doubt its accuracy. SeeTijerina v. Thornburgh , 884 F.2d 861, 865 (8th Cir. 1989) (“Federal courts must go beyond the sentencing order of the district court judge to clarify an ‘ambiguous’ sentence only where the sentencing judge himself creates the ambiguity by issuing an equivocal order.”); see also Lionel v. Day , 430 F. Supp. 384, 386 (W.D. Okla. 1976) (“Obviously no comment or order by a state judge can control the service of a federal sentence.”).- 3 -

Having carefully reviewed the record and having fully considered Brown’s arguments, we AFFIRM the dismissal for substantially the same reasons set out in the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge, which the district court adopted. R. Vol. I, Tabs 11 & 13.
ENTERED FOR THE COURT
Stephen H. Anderson Circuit Judge
Exhibit 32.1





Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.



In connection with the quarterly report of Gateway Certifications, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his knowledge:



1.

The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.

Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this



19th day of May 2008.





/s/ Lawrence Williams, Jr.

______________________________



Lawrence Williams, Jr.

Principal Executive Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
of IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: November 19, 2008
    /s/ Steven DarakSteven DarakChief Financial Officer, Investors Mortgage  
Holdings, Inc., manager of IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte & 

 Touche LLP, and Deloitte Financial 

 Advisory Services LLP

)

)

)

ASBCA No. 63396

)

Under Contract Nos. N00039-15-C-0057 )

FA2550-17-C-8006 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Thomas A. Lemmer, Esq.

Phillip R. Seckman, Esq.

Jessica R. Chao, Esq.

 Dentons US LLP

 Denver, CO

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Samuel W. Morris, Esq.

 DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Peter M. Casey, Esq.

 Trial Attorney

 Defense Contract Management Agency

 Hanscom Air Force Base, MA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 27, 2023

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals
2

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the 

Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63396, Appeal of Deloitte 

Consulting LLP, Deloitte & Touche LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services 

LLP, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 27, 2023

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

943.1 

KA 13-00189 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, LINDLEY, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

ODELL WILKENS, ALSO KNOWN AS ODELL WILKINS, 

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (DEBORAH K. JESSEY OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ODELL WILKENS, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DONNA A. MILLING OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal, by permission of a Justice of the Appellate Division of

the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department, from an order of

the Erie County Court (Thomas P. Franczyk, J.), dated December 11,

2012. The appeal was held by this Court by order entered March 20,

2015, the decision was reserved and the matter was remitted to Erie

County Court for further proceedings (126 AD3d 1293).

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of discontinuance

signed by the defendant on July 7, 2015, and by the attorneys for the

parties on July 7 and 23, 2015,

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed 

upon stipulation.

Entered: October 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 *LL&E-ROYALTY TRUST
 LL&E ROYALTY TRUST ANNOUNCES TRUST DISTRIBUTION FOR OCTOBER 2007
 LL&E ROYALTY TRUST
 The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.  Trustee
 NEWS
RELEASE
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE




---



##### 








---



##### 



Contact:
    
    LL&E ROYALTY TRUSTThe Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as TrusteeMike Ulrich(800) 852-1422www.businesswire.com/cnn/lrt.htm
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ William L. TransierWilliam L. TransierChief Executive OfficerNovember 7, 2007
#### In the Matter of Joseph Modugno, Petitioner, against Leona Baumgartner, as Health Commissioner of the City of New York, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 3, 1958.

*1023
      *F. William Guma, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*Peter Campbell, Brown, Corporation Counsel (Howard C. Fischbaoh*of counsel), for respondent.

Louis J. Capozzoli, J.

The petition of .the petitioner herein, No; 4 on the calendar of April 1,1958, in which he seeks an order compelling the respondent, Commissioner of Health of the City of New .York,- to include in the budget of the department of health funds for mosquito control, is denied.

The cross motion of the respondent, No. 52 on the same calendar, which seeks a dismissal of the petition, pursuant to rules 106 and 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, is granted.

The budget of the City of New York is not dictated by the commissioner of health, not even as to her own department. The budget is adopted in accordance with the provisions of the New York City Charter. All that a department head may do is to submit an estimate of expenses for the ensuing budget year to the bureau of the budget (New York City Charter, § 114 [1938]). Thereafter the over.-all budget prepared by the bureau is submitted to the Board of Estimate and to the City Council (Charter, § 121). From that point on the‘procedure to be followed is outlined in sections 122 through 126 of the charter.

The respondent could not insist on any particular amount for any particular work. She can only use such moneys as are finally appropriated for her department by the budget as finally adopted.

In the case of *Williams*v. *City of New York*(118 App. Div. 756, 761, affd. 192 N. Y. 541) there is the following: “ If each department, if each board, if each officer, were at liberty to proceed according to his view of the necessities of his own peculiar work, the city would very speedily exceed its debt incurring capacity.”

In addition to the above, it is well established that this court má'y not interfere with the exercise of the discretionary powers possessed by municipal officials in the discharge of their duties. •”Tlie courts do not sit in judgment upon questions of legislative policy or administrative discretion. The taxpayer must point to illegality or fraud ”. *(Campbell*v. *City of New York,*244 N. Y. 317, 328, 50 A. L. R. 1480.)

Again, in *Picone v. City of New York*(176 Misc. 967, 970) the court said: “ The'courts have no right to" sit in judgment upon questions of administrative discretion, or interfere with the conduct of municipal officials in the absence of illegality, fraud, collusion, corruption or bad faith. ’ ’
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3527 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3527

   To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 
           Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 16, 2015

 Mrs. Lummis introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                     Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 
           Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEVILS TOWER.

    (a) In General.--The mountain at the Devils Tower National 
Monument, Wyoming, located at 4435'26"N, by 10442'55"W, and the area 
located at 4435'21"N, by 10441'48"W, shall be known and designated as 
``Devils Tower''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in any law, map, regulation, order, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the mountain 
and area described in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 
to ``Devils Tower''.
                                 <all>
```
DESIGNATION OF AGENT FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE. PROCESS. ORDERS DECISIONS AND REQUIREMENTS Ch i ef. Documenlllly Ser-Vices Dtv

. **Depanm~nt** of Transportation Washington.
D
. C . Z0.590 office at ATIENTION

: DOCKET
S E CTION, 

### C-SS london Executive Aviation Limited ! Name of Company. please print) Stapleford Airport, Stapleford Tawney

, Essex, RM4 1 SJ, United Kingdom (Addr e ss)

. having its princ

i pal hereby designates. pursuant to se ction IOOS(b) of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958, !he 

### person named below 

### as its Agent upon whom service of all notices and process. and all orders, decisions, and requirements of the Depanmcnt ofTransponauon may be made for and on 

### behalf of 5aid carrier: hereby canceling all previous designations of agents made by 

### i t to the 

### DOT: Sheryl R. Israel **NameofAgent~r-=~~~r-T~~~--------------------------------------------** Hogan Lovelis 

### OS L[P (Please Print) 555 Thirteenth Street. NW Washington, DC 20004 Address shecy! !srael@hoganloye!ls com· tel +1.202

. 637

. 8898: fax +1.202.637.5910 The A&ent so de.!i&naled has written his name and abo his initials in 

### the foUowing space: 

### N .... 

# 5 h.et- j ( 

# ::GS rC\e



# I (Initials) 

# _ 1' _ "1: ;;;,;_ ___
_ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, ___ Lo_n_d_o_n_E_x_e_c_uu_

· v_e_A_v_ia_t_io_n_l_im_lte_d ________________

has caused these (Name of Company) presents to be signed in its na.mc by George

Galanopoulos Managing Director 

## -------------------------------------------·~

(Pl ease Pri.Dt) of said company. and to be attested 

### u Dde r its COflJO fVe seal by Christopher Watson Commercial Manager (Secretary, or other Title) on this ___
\ 

## ~---- day of August



# s 2014 ATIEST: (Sec;retary

, or other officer) O S T F 1010.1 (1 -a t

By : london Executive Aviation Limited (N ame of Company) 

# ~