alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32





CERTIFICATION
      OF PERIODIC REPORT


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I,
      Cynthia Grisham, President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officers of Cinjet, Inc., (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that
      to
      the best of my knowledge:





(1)
            the
                Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, of the Company for the fiscal quarter
                ended
                September 30, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
                Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                U.S.C.
                78m or 78 o(d)); and





(2)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.









Date:
      November 10, 2008





/s/
      Cynthia Grisham


Cynthia
      Grisham


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


Treasurer
      and Chief Financial Officer








A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act has been furnished to Cinjet, Inc. and will be retained by Cinjet, Inc.
      and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 10.79


 




 


Addendum No.1 to


Contract No 840/08624332/1609-14


 


Date of signature: July 31, 2014


 


THE SELLER/THE MANUFACTURER


Open Joint Stock Company «Institute of The Nuclear Materials»
(JSC «INM»)


624250, Russia, Sverdlovsk Region,


Zarechniy, PO Box 29


Phone.: 7 (34377) 362 64 


FAX: 7 (34377) 733 46


E-mail: shipping@inm-rosatom.ru


 


THE BUYER


The Company IsoRay Medical Inc.


350 Hills Street, Suite 106


Richland, WA 99354-5411 USA


 


THE CONSIGNEE


The Company IsoRay Medical Inc.


350 Hills Street, Suite 106


Richland, WA 99354-5411 US


Airport of destination: Seattle or Portland, USA


 


NOTIFICATION


FedEX Trade Networks 16353 NE Cameron Blvd


Portland, Oregon 97230 USA


Phone: +1503-255 1391 ext.14


 


THE END USER 


The Company IsoRay Medical Inc.


350 Hills Street, Suite 106


Richland, WA 99354-5411 USA


 


THE SHIPPER


Open Joint Stock Company “Institute of The Nuclear Materials”
(JSC “INM”)


P.O. Box 29, Zarechny,


Sverdlovsk Region, Russia, 624250


Tel:7 (34377) 362 64


Fax: 7 (34377) 333 96


 


TERMS OF DELIVERY


CPT airport Seattle or Portland, USA


(Incoterms 2010)


 


THE BUYERS and THE SELLERS have mutually agreed
that under the present Contract The payment is to be received on the account of the Seller not later than in 60 (sixty) calendar
days from the date of the delivery of the goods.


 


To prolong the period of validity of the present contract till
the 31st of March, 2015.


 


All other terms and conditions of Contract No 840/08624332/1609-14
remind unchanged.


 


The present Addendum is an integral part of the above mentioned
contract and may be signed by E-mail.


 







 





	THE SELLERS	THE BUYERS
	/s/ Dmitrii Vladimirovich Markov	/s/ Brien Ragle
	Director of Closed Stock Company «Science and Inovation», 	Brien Ragle
	a managing company for JSC «INM»	CFO IsoRay Medical
SHARE

# Center for Artificial Intelligence Security Research

## Bringing scientific rigor to the study of AI risks 

To address emerging AI threats, ORNL has established the Center for Artificial Intelligence Security Research, or CAISER. With a particular focus on cyber, biometrics, geospatial analysis, and nonproliferation, CAISER will analyze vulnerabilities, threats, and risks related to the security and misuse of AI tools in national security domains.

CAISER - est. 2023

*“We are at a crossroads. AI tools and AI-based technologies are inherently vulnerable and exploitable, which can lead to unforeseen consequences. We’re defining a new field of AI security research and committing to intensive research and development of mitigating strategies and solutions against emerging AI risks.”*

- Edmon Begoli, CAISER founding director

Artificial intelligence is rapidly being incorporated into many industries and applications, including systems designed to keep our nation safe. While it swiftly performs tasks that would take humans much longer to complete, it is hackable and exploitable. AI capabilities are advancing significantly faster than our ability secure it from attacks. ORNL resolves to lead research to understand **AI****threats, vulnerabilities, exploitation risks, and misuses** to inform reliability and robustness needs.

Initially, CAISER will focus on four national security domains that align with ORNL strengths — AI for cybersecurity, biometrics, geospatial intelligence and nuclear nonproliferation — in collaboration with national security and industry partners. By elucidating a clear, science-based picture of risks and mitigation strategies, CAISER’s research will provide greater assurance to federal partners that the AI tools they adopt are reliable and robust against adversarial attacks.

View a hi-res version of this image

Address problems related threats and risks to national security originating from the misuse of AI, the proliferation of AI with state and non-state actors, and super-intelligent AI.

View a hi-res version of this image

Leverage expertise and facilities across ORNL, partner organizations, and the government to serve as the focal point for collaborative engagement. 

View a hi-res version of this image

Establish science-backed solutions to protect national security assets from rising concerns about AI safety and associated risks.

## Our talented researchers make the difference!

Experts in machine learning, mathematics, and natural language processing are applying the latest scientific research to securing our nation from AI threats. 

Meet the team

## Partnerships

### Air Force Research Lab

Learn More

### Dept of Homeland Security

Learn More

## Our Stories

View All News

    Contributing to community standards for AI security, privacy  

    New Oak Ridge National Lab center to study risks of artificial intelligence  

    Oak Ridge National Laboratory supporting executive order on AI technology  

    Chess game: How cyberattacks and artificial intelligence are evolving  

View All News
#### OLDHAM v. PEDEN CO.

No. 2399.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

May 27, 1933.

Rehearing Denied May 31, 1933.

Adams, Moore & White, of Beaumont, for appellant.

D. C. Marcus and A. L. Calhoun, both of Beaumont, for appellee.

O’QUINN, Justice.

Peden Company sued Oldham to recover on a merchandise account in the sum of $212.48. The suit was on an itemized and verified account. Oldham answered under oath denying the justness of the account in whole or *482in part. A trial before tbe court resulted in a judgment for appellee for tbe amount sued! for.

Tbe verified account was offered in evidence. Tbe affidavit verifying tbe account, omitting formal parts, reads:

“Before me, O. D. Joacbimi, a notary public in and for Jefferson County, Texas, on this day personally appeared R. A. Wolf, known to me, who being by me duly sworn, states on oath that tbe foregoing and annexed account in favor of B. I». Wilson Hardware Co., Beaumont, Texas, which is a corporation organized and existing under tbe laws of tbe State of Texas and of which corporation affiant is tbe authorized Credit Manager, and which account is against Gus Old-ham, 1210 Roberts Avenue, of Beaumont, Texas, • in the sum of Two Hundred Twelve & 48/100 ($212.48) Dollars, is within the knowledge of affiant, just and true; that it is due and that all just and lawful offsets, payments and credits have been' allowed.

> “E. D. Wilson Hardware Company,

> “By: R. A. Wolf, Credit Manager.

> “Sworn and subscribed before me, this 24th day of October, A. D. 1931.

> “[Seal.] C. J. Joachimi,

> “Notary Public, Jefferson County, Texas.”

The plaintiff appellee, Peden Company, alleged that it was a corporation, domiciled in Houston, Harris county, Tex., and doing business in Jefferson county, Tex., and elsewhere under the assumed name of E. L. Wilson Hardware Company, and that it (Peden Company) sold the goods to appellant, Gus Oldham. The affidavit verifying the account says that the account was in favor of the E. L. Wilson Hardware Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Texas. The. account itself shows the merchandise to have been sold to Oldham by the E. D. Wilson Hardware Company. The allegations of appellee’s petition as to the account, and the proof is at fatal variance. The judgment, not being supported by the evidence, must be reversed and remanded for a new trial, and it is so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-40631 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOSE LUIS SANTOS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-00-CR-1268-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Luis Santos, Jr. has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Santos has received a copy of counsel’s motion and brief but has not filed a response. Our independent review of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81896]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23315]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Patent and Trademark Office

[Docket No.: PTO-C-2024-0031]


Performance Review Board

AGENCY: United States Patent and Trademark Office, Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of revised board members.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In conformance with the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, the 
United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announces the 
appointment of persons to serve as members of its Performance Review 
Board (PRB). This is an update to the recently published Federal 
Register notice (published on July 16, 2024), to reflect a board member 
serving in the role of a new position as the Interim Chief Public 
Engagement Officer.

ADDRESSES: Office of Human Resources, USPTO, P.O. Box 1450, Alexandria, 
VA 22313-1450.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lari B. Washington, Director, Human 
Capital Management, USPTO, at 571-272-5187.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The membership of the USPTO's PRB is as 
follows:

Derrick Brent, Chair, Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for 
Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the USPTO
Frederick W. Steckler, Vice Chair, Chief Administrative Officer, USPTO
Vaishali Udupa, Commissioner for Patents, USPTO
David S. Gooder, Commissioner for Trademarks, USPTO
Dennis J. Hoffman, Chief Financial Officer, USPTO
Henry J. Holcombe, Chief Information Officer, USPTO
David L. Berdan, General Counsel, USPTO
Scott D. Ewalt, Interim Chief Public Engagement Officer, USPTO
Sharon Israel, Chief Policy Officer and Director for International 
Affairs, USPTO
Gerard F. Rogers, Chief Administrative Trademark Judge, USPTO
Scott R. Boalick, Chief Administrative Patent Judge, USPTO
Bismarck Myrick, Director of the Office of Equal Employment Opportunity 
and Diversity, USPTO
Cara Duckworth, Chief Corporate Communications Officer, USPTO
Shirin Bidel-Niyat, Chief of Staff, USPTO

    Alternates:

Robin Evans, Deputy Commissioner for Patents, USPTO
Amy Cotton, Deputy Commissioner for Trademark Examination Policy, USPTO

Katherine K. Vidal,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of 
the United States Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2024-23315 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-16-P
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

DANIEL LYNN THOMAS

, Appellant,

v.

JOSEPH NASTASI

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 540

[ January 25, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit,

Broward County ; Jeffrey R. Levenson , Judge; L.T. Case No. CACE02

- 011972 (08)

.

Robert L. Jennings of Jennings & Valancy, P.A., Stuart, for appellant.

John H . Pelzer of Greenspoon Marder, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for

appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ERBER

, C.J., T AYLOR and C ONN ER

, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
An equal opportunity employer Thomas M. Gray 211(b) Technical Manager

1220 L Street, Northwest Washington, DC 20005-4070

Tel 202-682-8480

Fax 202-682-8270 E-mail grayt@api.org
October 16, 2009

Karl Simon

Director Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W.

Mail Code: 6406J Washington, DC 20460

RE: CAA Section 211(b) Fuels and Fuel Additives Health Effects Testing Regulation: Second Draft Final Report Gasoline TAME Vapor Condensate - A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (Study No. 00-6128)

Dear Mr. Karl Simon:

The American Petroleum Institute (API), on behalf of the Section 211(b) Research Group (RG), is submitting the following information for EPA review and approval as par tial fulfillment of the CAA Section 211(b) Alternative Tier 2 requirements of the testing regulation:

• Second Draft Final Report: Gasoline TAME Vapor Condensate A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (Study No. 00-6128)

• Reviewer Checklist

The Second Draft Final Report addresses all EPA and inde pendent reviewer comments as indicated, with page citation, in the Reviewer Checklist.

When the RG receives EPA’s approval of the second draft repor t, the final study report will be submitted to you at the EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Trans portation and Regional Programs Division, as part of the requirements of Clean Air Act Section 211(b)(2) and 211(e) (Docket No. A-90-07). If you require further information, please contact Tom Gray by mail at this address.

Regards,

Thomas M. Gray

Encl (2): Second Draft Final Report: Gasoline TAME Vapor Condensate A 13-Week Whole-Body Inhalation Study in Rats with Neurotoxicity Assessment and 4-Week In Vivo Genotoxicity and Immunotoxicity Assessments (Study No. 00-6128)

Reviewer Checklist

Cc: Joe Sopata, EPA (via email)
Exhibit 32








MEDIA SENTIMENT, INC.


529 Buchanan Street


San Francisco, CA  94102


(415) 861-3421




EXHIBIT 32




Section 1350 Certification





As Adopted Pursuant To


Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002





Certification of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer




In connection with the Form 10-Q of Media Sentiment, Inc. (the “Company”) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company certifies, to the best knowledge and belief of the signatory, pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








August 9, 2010





/s/ Marian Munz


Marian Munz, CEO


Principal Executive Officer








/s/ William White


William White, CFO


Principal Financial Officer







This certification accompanying the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE



Reference is hereby made
to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of October 1, 2012, by and among Deutsche Mortgage & Asset Receiving
Corporation, as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC
Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
as Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian and Situs Holdings LLC, as Operating Advisor, with respect to Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-CCRE3 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined
shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.



Pursuant to Section 10.11
of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:





| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from October 1, 2012 through December
31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations
under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the period October 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th day of March 2013.









|Daniel Bober             | 
|------------------------ | 
|Executive Vice President | 
|Wells Fargo Bank         | 











|Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. | 
|-------------------------- |
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 11-1028

___________ Cindy J. Cook, * * Plaintiff - Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Minnesota. Anthony A. Petrocchi; Anthony A. * Petrocchi, P.C., * [UNPUBLISHED] * Defendants - Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: November 14, 2011 Filed: January 9, 2012

___________ Before WOLLMAN, MURPHY, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM.
Cindy J. Cook appeals the district court’s 1 dismissal of her complaint alleging violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1692e. In 2007, Cook obtained a mortgage loan. Real Time Resolutions (RTR) was the loan servicer. In August 2009 – and again in March 2010 – attorney Anthony A. Petrocchi wrote Cook for his client, RTR, stating thatRTR had tried to contact her to collect

1 The Honorable Ann D . Montgomery, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.payment on the mortgage and that failure to respond to the letters “may result in RTR filing legal action” against he r. Cook sued, alleging the letters violated the FDCPA. The district court dismissed Cook’s complaint for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009).
We review de novo a district court’ s dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6). See Van Zee v. Hanson , 630 F.3d 1126, 1128 (8th Cir. 2011) (citing Gregory v. Dillard’s, Inc. , 565 F.3d 464, 472 (8th Cir. 2009) (en banc )). Having reviewed the record and considered Cook’s arguments, we affirm on th e basis of the analysis set forth in the district court’s thorough memorandum opinion and order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code), each of the undersigned
officers of TechniScan, Inc. (the "Company") does hereby certify with respect to
the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2009 (the "Report") that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: November 16, 2009
                                            /s/ David C. Robinson
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            David C. Robinson
                                            Principal Executive Officer

Date: November 16, 2009
                                            /s/ Steven K. Passey
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Steven K. Passey
                                            Principal Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a
separate disclosure document.
Exhibit 10.1


 


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA


DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY


OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY


 


	
In the Matter of:

	
)


	
MetaBank

	
)


	
Storm Lake, Iowa

	
)










ORDER TERMINATING THE


ORDER TO CEASE AND DESIST


 


WHEREAS, in an effort to protect the depositors, shareholders and other customers of MetaBank, Storm Lake, Iowa (Bank), and to ensure the Bank’s safe and sound operation, the Bank, by and through its duly elected and acting Board of Directors, consented to the issuance of an Order to Cease and Desist dated July 15, 2011 (Order) against the Bank by the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS).


 


WHEREAS on or about July 21, 2011, pursuant to Title III of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Pub. L. 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010), all functions of the OTS related to Federal savings associations were transferred to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”).


 


WHEREAS, the Comptroller believes that the protection of the depositors, shareholders and other customers of the Bank, as well as its safe and sound operation, no longer require the existence of the Order.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, the Comptroller directs that the Order be, and it hereby is, TERMINATED.


 


IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, the undersigned, designated by the Comptroller as his authorized representative. has hereunto set his hand.


 


	
/s/ Thomas J. Sutcliffe

		
8/7/14


	
Thomas J. Sutcliffe

		
Date


	
Assistant Deputy Comptroller for Bank Supervision

		
 


	
Sioux Falls Field Office