T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. M I CHAEL P AU L GRI ND ALL, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 10291 D . C. N o . 4 : 1 0 - c r - 0 3 0 9 0 - RCC ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f orthe D i s tr i c tof

A r i z ona R a ne rC . C ol l i ns , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d June 18, 2013 ** B efo re: T A L L M A N , M . S M IT H , an dH U R W IT Z , C i rcu i tJu d g es. M i c ha e l P aul G r i nda l l appe a l s f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e nta nd c h a lle n g e s th e 4 6 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g th e r e v o c a tio n o f p r o b a tio n . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. G r in d a ll c o n te n d s th a t th e d is tr ic t c o u rt p r o c e d u r a llye rr e db yf a ilin g to 

# FI LED JU N 24 2013 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10291 2 a de qua t e l ye xpl a i n the s e nt e nc e ore xpr e s s l ys t a t e the appl i c abl e s e nt e nc i ng r a nge u n d e rU .S .S .G . § 7 B 1 .4 . W e r e v ie w f o rp la in e rr o r , s e e U

ni te d States v . V

ale nc i aB arr agan , 60 8 F . 3d 11 03 , 11 08 (9th C i r. 20 10 ), and fi nd no ne. T he di stri ctcourt di s c us s e d a tl e ngth i t s j us t i f i c a t i on f orthe s e nt e nc e a nd G r i nda l l ha s nots how n a r e a s onabl e pr obabi l i tytha the w oul d ha ve r e c e i ve d adi f f e r e nts e nt e nc e ha d the c o u rt e x p r e s s lys ta te dth e ap p lic ab le s e n te n c in g r a n g e . See U ni ted States v. D al lm an , 53 3 F . 3d 75 5, 76 2 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). G r in d a ll a ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le b e c au s e th e d is tr ic t c o u rt b a s e dth e s e n te n c e o n s ta te m e n ts it m a d e w h e n it o r ig in a llyim p o s e das e n te n c e o f p r o b a tio n . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt d idn o t ab u s e its d is c r e tio n in im p o s in g G r in d a ll’s s e n te n c e . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 552 U . S . 38, 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) . Th e s e n t e n c e i s s u b s t a n t i v e l yr e a s o n ab l e i n l i g h to f th e 1 8 U . S. C. § 3 5 5 3 ( a ) s e n te n c in g f

a c to r s a n dth e to ta lityo f th e c ir c u m s ta n c e s . Se e i d. F i na l l y , G r i nda l l a l s o c ont e nds tha thi s s e nt e nc e w a s di s pr oport i ona t e t o the vi ol a t i on a nd the r e f

or e vi ol a t e d the E i ghth A m e ndm e nt . T hi s c ont e nt i on l a c ks m e r it. See U

ni ted States v. P arke r , 241 F . 3d 1114, 1117 ( 9th C i r . 2001) (“ G ener al l y, as l on g as the se nt ence i m po se d o n a defendantdo es no texce ed s ta tu to rylim its , th is c o u rt w ill n o t o v e rtu rn it o n E ig h th A m e n d m e n t g r o u n d s .” ) . AF F I RME D.