alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1.4

CERTIFICATION

I, James K. Sanders, principal financial officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company (the
Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 28, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James K. Sanders                                                                      
|James K. Sanders, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
|                                                                                          

November 4, 2008
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 
     /s/ Gary L. PittmanGary L. PittmanSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer and Secretary
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3567 

To repeal the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. BRAT (for himself and Mr. CHABOT) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To repeal the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘HMDA Repeal Act 

5 of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE HOME MORTGAGE DISCLOSURE 

7 ACT OF 1975. 

8 (a) REPEAL.—The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 

9 1975 (12 U.S.C. 2801 et seq.) is repealed. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3567 IH

1 (1) FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK ACT.—Section 

2 10(k)(1) of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act (12 

3 U.S.C. 1430(k)(1)) is amended by striking subpara4 graph (B) and redesignating subparagraph (C) as 

5 subparagraph (B). 

6 (2) HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

7 ACT OF 1992.—The Housing and Community Devel8 opment Act of 1992 (12 U.S.C. 4501 et seq.) is 

9 amended— 

10 (A) in section 1323(a), by striking para11 graph (2) (relating to ‘‘Census tract level re12 porting’’); 

13 (B) in section 1326, by amending sub14 section (d) to read as follows: 

15 ‘‘(d) MORTGAGE INFORMATION.—Subject to privacy 

16 considerations, the Director shall, by regulation or order, 

17 provide that certain information relating to single family 

18 mortgage data of the enterprises shall be disclosed to the 

19 public, in order to make available to the public information 

20 collected by the Director under section 1324(b)(6).’’; and 

21 (C) in section 1332(e)— 

22 (i) in paragraph (2)(A)— 

23 (I) by striking ‘‘and for which in24 formation under the Home Mortgage 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3567 IH

1 Disclosure Act of 1975 is publicly 

2 available’’; 

3 (II) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘, 

4 or’’ and inserting ‘‘; or’’; 

5 (III) in clause (ii), by striking 

6 the comma at the end and inserting a 

7 period; and 

8 (IV) by striking the matter after 

9 and below clause (ii); and 

10 (ii) by striking paragraphs (4) and 

11 (5). 

12 (3) DODD-FRANK WALL STREET REFORM AND

13 CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT.—The Dodd-Frank 

14 Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 

15 (12 U.S.C. 5301 et seq.) is amended— 

16 (A) in section 1002(12)— 

17 (i) by striking subparagraph (K); and 

18 (ii) by redesignating subparagraphs 

19 (L) through (R) as subparagraphs (K) 

20 through (Q), respectively; and 

21 (B) in section 1013(c)(2)(A), by striking 

22 ‘‘and the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Targanta Therapeutics Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with
the SEC on the date hereof (the Report), Mark W. Leuchtenberger, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and George A. Eldridge, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to Targanta Therapeutics Corporation and will be retained by Targanta Therapeutics Corporation and furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Mark W. Leuchtenberger
|Mark W. Leuchtenberger    
|Chief Executive Officer   
|May 13, 2008              



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ George A. Eldridge 
|George A. Eldridge     
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 13, 2008
Considered by: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, and Duffy, JJ., and 1 Circuit Judge Trader, assigned by reason of vacancy. NO. 28690
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

JEFFREY SMITH and LAUREL SMITH, Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellees,

vs. HEINZ-GUENTHER PINK, Respondent/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CIVIL NO. 1RC07-1-0711)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., for the court ) 1 Petitioners/Plaintiffs-Appellees Jeffrey Smith and Laurel Smith’s application for writ of certiorari filed on August 24, 2010, is hereby rejected. Insofar as Respondent/ Defendant-Appellant’s Answer to Writ of Certiorari filed on September 7, 2010, can be construed as an application for writ of certiorari, it is also rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, October 7, 2010.
FOR THE COURT:

Chief Justice
Michael P. Kalish on the application forpetitioners/plaintiffsappellees. Heinz-Guenther Pink, pro se, on the answerfor respondent/defendantappellant. Electronically Filed Supreme Court 28690 07-OCT-2010 01:40 PM
**Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
**EXHIBIT 23.2** **CONSENT OF    INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual    Report    (Form 10-K)    of Friedman Industries, Incorporated of our report dated    June 27, 2006, with respect to the consolidated financial    statements of Friedman Industries, Incorporated, included in the    2007 Annual Report to Shareholders of Friedman Industries,    Incorporated.     Our audits also included the financial statement schedule of    Friedman Industries, Incorporated listed in Item 15(a).    This schedule is the responsibility of Friedman Industries,    Incorporated’s management. Our responsibility is to express    an opinion based on our audits. In our opinion, as to which the    date is June 27, 2006, the financial statement schedule    referred to above, when considered in relation to the basic    financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all    material respects the information set forth therein.     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-37887)    pertaining to the 1996 Stock Option Plan, the 1995 Non-Employee    Director Plan, as amended, and the 1989 Incentive Stock Option    Plan, as amended, and in the Registration Statement    (Form S-8No. 333-47262)    pertaining to the 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Plan of our    report dated June 27, 2006, with respect to the    consolidated financial statements of Friedman Industries,    Incorporated incorporated herein by reference, and our report    included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the    financial statement schedule of Friedman Industries,    Incorporated included in this Annual Report    (Form 10-K)    of Friedman Industries, Incorporated. /s/  Ernst    & Young LLP     Houston, Texas    June 26, 2007
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.



# United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2009-3079 PATRICIA HOOKS,

Petitioner,

v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in

AT0752070959-I-1. ON MOTION Before MOORE,Circuit Judge.
ORDER Patricia Hooks moves for an extension of time to file her brief. The Merit Systems Protection Board moves for leave to intervene for purposes of moving to reform the caption to designate the Board as respondent. The Board states that the Department of the Interior opposes. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Hooks filed an appeal alleging that her resignation was involuntary. The Administrative Judge determined that Hooks had not demonstrated that her resignation was involuntary and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Because the Board heldthat it did not have jurisdiction, it did not address the merits of the case. See Garcia v.

Department of Homeland Security, 437 F.3d 1322, 1341 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (en banc) ("In a constructive action case, the jurisdictional fact at issue is almost always whether the facially voluntary action was involuntary. Involuntariness is essential for jurisdiction and it must be proven by the claimant. But while jurisdiction is established under 5 U.S.C. § 7512, the merits of the case are determined by the agency's compliance with § 7513(a)- (b). In other words, the jurisdictional determination is not identical to the merits determination"). Thus, the Board is the proper respondent. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: Hooks' motion for an extension of time is granted. Hooks' brief is due within 60 days of the date of filing of this order. No further extensions should be anticipated.

The Board's motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above. FOR THE COURT 

# MAR 2 0 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly 

### FILED Clerk U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL CIRCUff cc: Willie C. Weaver, Sr., Esq. James P. Connor, Esq. Calvin M. Morrow, Esq. s17 MAR 2 0 2009
CLERK Date

2009-3079 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

ULISER GALDAMEZ, IN HIS OWN RIGHT

AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF OLGA GALDAMEZ, DEC, AND JAYLIN STEFFANY GALDAMEZ,

DEC.

v.

U

- HAUL CO. OF PENNSYLVANIA, U

HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. AMERICO, JOVAN MARTIN, MIGUEL RIVERA, ERJON MENI AND ERI VENDING CART, INC. VICTORIA LEE, LATAJAH MINTON AND SHALANDA WILSON, P/N/G SAMIRA CHINA (A MINOR)

v.

ULISER GALDAMEZ, IN HIS OWN RIGHT

AND AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF OLGA GALDAMEZ, DEC.

AND JA YLIN STEFFANY GALDAMEZ KIMBERLY JUAREZ, A MINOR, BY ELIDA JUAREZ, NATURAL GUARDIAN

U

- HAUL OF JUNIATA

PARK/FELTONVILLE

v.

GUILLERMO OTTONIEL PAREDES

- TEO

A/K/A OTTO PAREDES A/K/A OTTO JAVIER A/K/A OTTONEIL REYES,

INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A/ LA

PARILLADA CHAPINA :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 547 EAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court[ 547 EAL 2016 ]

- 2

PETITION OF: MIGUEL RIVERA AND

JOVAN MARTIN :

:

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 18th day of April, 2017

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
#### KARR v. STATE.

No. 18194.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1936.

E. F. Mathis, of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for engaging in the business of a wholesale dealer in fish without having paid the tax required of fish dealers. Punishment assessed was a fine of $100.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception, in which condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
United States

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 19-306 Date: September 2019 

Subject: September 2019 Headcount

This is a reminder for payroll providers to submit the semiannual Headcount for the September

2019 reporting period no later than September 16, 2019. 

The Headcount is reported semiannually (March and September) by all payroll providers, 

including the cross-service providers (e.g. National Finance Center, Defense Finance and

Accounting Service, etc.) that withhold monies from salaries for participants in the Civil Service

Retirement System (CSRS), Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), Federal Employees 

Retirement System – Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-RAE), Federal Employees Retirement

System – Further Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE), Federal Employees and

Annuitants Health Benefits (FEHB) Program, and/or the Federal Employees and Annuitants 

Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Program.

The September 2019 Headcount for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles is for the payroll paid 

during the first 15 days of September. The reporting period for the monthly pay cycles will be

for August 1 through August 31, 2019. All Headcount reports must be submitted no later than 

September 16, 2019. If you anticipate a delay or any difficulties in submitting the report by that 

date, please notify us. Under no circumstances should you delay transmitting your normal 

Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) report because your Headcount is not ready

for submission. 

Please email your updated OPM Form 1523 and SF 2812-A to FundsManagementTrustFunds@opm.gov. You may also fax (clear and legible) originals to 202-606-0701 or mail 

the original forms to: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Funds Management, P.O. Box 

7125, Washington DC 20415. If you have any questions concerning the preparation of your 

Headcount report, please call Yadira Vega at 202-606-4842. 

To streamline and improve our headcount data collection process, over the next several months 

OPM will be implementing an online web-based headcount data collection system. Look for 

detailed communications in the coming months regarding the electronic submission of the OPM 

1523 and SF 2812-A forms. 

DENNIS D. COLEMAN

Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 230/2012

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.230.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 230 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5525 August 2012 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2012.230.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 230

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5525 August 2012

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 773/2012 of 24 August 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 774/2012 of 24 August 2012 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 971/2011 for the 2011/12 marketing year | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 773/2012 of 24 August 2012 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 774/2012 of 24 August 2012 amending the representative prices and additional import duties for certain products in the sugar sector fixed by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 971/2011 for the 2011/12 marketing year

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
On January 20, 2016, the FAA had a telephone conference call with Amazon.com. The FAA needed

further clarification on the use of the term ‘non‐participant’ in their petition. Amazon clarified that the

term ‘non‐participant’ as the general public not having knowledge of the UAS operation who may

unknowingly enter the area of operation.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification of the Co-Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, the Co-Chief Executive Officer of Altisource Asset Management Corporation (the “Company”), hereby certifies on the date hereof, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2018 (“Form 10-K/A”), filed concurrently herewith by the Company, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Form 10-K/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
 
 
 Date:April 29, 2020By:/s/George G. EllisonGeorge G. EllisonCo-Chief Executive Officer
Attachment A 

COST FACTORS - CSRS 

CATEGORY 

2000 

COST FACTOR 

(%) 

Regular 24.2 

Regular offset 19.3 

Law enforcement officers 40.0 

Law enforcement officers - offset 36.2 

Air traffic controllers 31.9 

Air traffic controllers – offset 28.2 

Members of Congress 29.3 

Members of Congress – offset 27.0 

Congressional employees 32.5 

Congressional employees – offset 27.8
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 15-305 Date: August 2015

Subject: September 2015 Headcount 

This is a reminder for payroll providers to submit the semiannual Headcount for the September 

2015 reporting period no later than September 18, 2015. 

The Headcount is reported semiannually (March and September) by all payroll providers that 

withhold monies from salaries for participants in the Civil Service Retirement System, Federal 

Employees Retirement System, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and/or the Federal 

Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program. 

The September 2015 Headcount for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles will be for the payroll paid 

during the FIRST 15 DAYS of September. For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period will be 

August 1 through August 31, 2015. All Headcount reports must be submitted no later than 

September 18, 2015. We ask that you notify us if you anticipate a delay or any difficulties in 

submitting the report by that date. Under no circumstances, however, should you delay 

transmitting your normal Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) report because your 

Headcount is not ready to be submitted. 

Please e-mail your forms to Yadira.Vega@opm.gov or Olaya.Ruffin@opm.gov.You may also 

FAX (using clear, legible originals) your OPM Forms 1523 and SF 2812-A to us at 

202-606-0701. In addition, please mail the original forms to: U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management, Funds Management, P.O. Box 7125, Washington DC 20415. If you have any 

questions concerning the preparation of your Headcount report, please call Ms.Vega at 

202-606-4842. 

 

 

Kolo Babagana 

Acting Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1186

LATASHA HOLLOWAY,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH, VIRGINIA,

 Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:18-cv-00069-AWA-RJK)

Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Latasha Holloway, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Latasha Holloway seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying without 

prejudice her motion to appoint counsel in her civil action. This court may exercise 

jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and 

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial 

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Holloway seeks to appeal is 

neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we 

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED