alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-60350

Summary Calendar

 

KALED AWDE-MOHAMMAD,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent.

--------------------

Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

BIA No. A28-328-391

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Kaled Awde-Mohammad (Awde) seeks review of the Board of

Immigration Appeals’s (BIA) summary affirmance of an Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) denial of Awde’s applications for asylum and

withholding of deportation, and order that he be deported to

Lebanon. Awde contends that the BIA violated his right to due

process by summarily affirming the IJ’s decision pursuant to

8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7). We AFFIRM.
No. 02-60350

-2-

Ashcroft contends that Awde’s argument on the merits of his

claims for asylum and withholding of deportation is foreclosed by

res judicata. The IJ denied Awde’s claim on grounds that relief

is precluded by res judicata, and the BIA affirmed without

opinion. Because Awde now makes no challenge to this ruling,

he is bound by it upon appeal. See Evergreen Presbyterian

Ministries, Inc., 235 F.3d 908, 918 (5th Cir. 2000).

Awde contends that the IJ’s order should be reversed because

he made no findings or holdings regarding Awde’s request for

withholding of deportation. In fact, the IJ specifically stated

that Awde’s application therefor was denied.

Eligibility for withholding of deportation requires proof of

a higher objective likelihood that an alien would be persecuted,

than is required to establish his eligibility for asylum. 

Consequently, the alien’s inability to establish that he is

entitled to asylum necessarily results in his inability to

demonstrate that he is entitled to withholding of deportation. 

See Efe v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 899, 906 (5th Cir. 2002). In light

of the IJ’s findings regarding asylum, therefore, there was no

need for him to state reasons why he also denied Awde’s request

for withholding of deportation.

Finally, Awde contends that the BIA’s summary affirmance

of the IJ’s decision by a single Board member pursuant to

8 C.F.R. § 3.1(a)(7) violated his due process rights under

the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This
No. 02-60350

-3-

contention was recently held to lack merit in Soadjede

v. Ashcroft, ___F.3d___ (5th Cir. March 28, 2003, No. 02-60314),

slip op. 2106, 2108. 

Accordingly, Awde’s petition for review is DENIED, and the

order of the BIA is AFFIRMED.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
 The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC or Receiver), as Receiver for each of the following insured depository institutions, was charged with the duty of winding up the affairs of the former institutions and liquidating all related assets. The Receiver has fulfilled its obligations and made all dividend distributions required by law. NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF RECEIVERSHIPS
Fund
Receivership name
City
State
Termination date10221
Lincoln Park Savings Bank
Chicago
IL
10/01/202410486
Community South Bank
Parsons
TN
10/01/202410524
Seaway Bank and Trust Company
Chicago
IL
10/01/2024
 The Receiver has further irrevocably authorized and appointed FDIC-Corporate as its attorney-in-fact to execute and file any and all documents that may be required to be executed by the Receiver which FDIC-Corporate, in its sole discretion, deems necessary, including but not limited to releases, discharges, satisfactions, endorsements, assignments, and deeds. Effective on the termination dates listed above, the Receiverships have been terminated, the Receiver has been discharged, and the Receiverships have ceased to exist as legal entities. (Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1819) Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Dated at Washington, DC, on October 1, 2024. James P. Sheesley, Assistant Executive Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2024-22964 Filed 10-3-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
Faulk, Scott (OST) 

From: 

Sent: 

To: 

Subject: 

Kanani Adolpho <kadolpho@hawaii.edu> 

Thursday, November 21, 2013 5:26 PM 

EAS (OST) 

Department of transportation 

I am writing to support Mokulele airlines 4 year bid to link Kalaupapa to Kahului, Honolulu, kapalua, and 

Ho'olehua. Mokulele is the best candidate as they have lower fares, experienced friendly agents, frequent 

flights, multiple islands and ease ofbooking via Global Distributions system ( Expedia,Travelosity, Orbitz, 

Priceline ect.) It is important we have safe, stable and affordable service to Kalaupapa. 

Please select Mokulele to serve Kalaupapa for 4 years. 

Aloha, 

kanani Adolpho 

1
EX-35.9
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of June 1, 2012, by and among RBS Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Certificate
Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC,
as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor and
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial
Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C7 (the "Agreement"). Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the
Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.11 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from June 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, and of its performance per the Agreement during
such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects
throughout the period June 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the
13th day of March 2013.

/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far
**Exhibit23.1****Consent of Independent Auditor**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-140254) on FormS-3 and (No. 333-135155) on Form S-8 of T-3 Energy Services,Inc. of our report dated October 8,2007, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Energy Equipment Corporation andSubsidiary as of December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements ofincome, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years thenended, which report appears inthe November 1, 2007 current report on Form 8-K of T-3 Energy Services, Inc.Hein & Associates LLPHouston, Texas
Circle ‘Round Your Benefits
 

How to Get the Most Value from the Programs 


June 2020

The intent of this diagram is to provide 

you with a general understanding of 

how the Federal Employees Health 

Benefits (FEHB) Program, the Federal 

Employees Dental and Vision Insurance 

Program (FEDVIP) and the Federal 

Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS) work together. For specific 

information on each Program, visit 

www.opm.gov/insure. FEHB 

Comprehensive medical insurance 

Dental benefits may be included 

Vision benefits may be included 

FSAFEDS 

Save money using tax-free 

dollars. You can put aside pretax dollars eachyear to pay for 

eligible health care services 

and items for you and your 

family that are not paid by your 

health, dental, or vision 

insurance. 

*Information on a

Dependent Care FSA is at 

www.FSAFEDS.com 

FEDVIP

 Dental - comprehensive 

dental insurance (such as free 

 semi-annual cleanings),

 and/or 

Vision - comprehensive vision 

insurance (such as yearly 

eye exam) 

FEHB and FSA 

Save money on eligible out-of-pocket 

expenses. When you have FEHB and an 

FSA, you can use money in your FSA 

to pay for your eligible FEHB 

out-of-pocket expenses (such as 

copayments and coinsurance) 

and qualified medical costs 

and health care expenses 

that your FEHB may 

not cover (such as 

chiropractic or 

hearing 

aids). 

FEHB and FEDVIP 

 Lower your out-of-pocket costs on 

dental and vision expenses with FEDVIP 

 coverage in addition to FEHB 

coverage. Your FEHB plan will be 

 the first payer for any 

dental and/or vision benefit 

payments they may 

also cover. 

FSA and FEDVIP 

Save money on eligible out-of-pocket dental and vision

 expenses after FEDVIP payments. When you have an 

FSA and FEDVIP, you can use money in your FSA 

to pay for your eligible FEDVIP out-of-pocket 

expenses (such as copayments and 

coinsurance) and eligible expenses 

that your FEDVIP plan 

may not cover. 

FEHB, FEDVIP, and FSA 

Save money on eligible out-of-pocket dental and vision 

expenses. When you have FEHB, FEDVIP, and an FSA, your 

FEHB plan will be the first payer of any benefit payments. 

You can use your FSA to pay for any eligible out-of-pocket 

expenses not covered by your FEHB or FEDVIP plan.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Morry Rubin, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ MORRY F. RUBINMorry F. RubinPrincipal Executive OfficerAugust 14, 2012
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 401 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-761, K2024-54.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22708 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

 

I, Erin M. Rohde, certify that:

 

(a)                                 A review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the applicable servicing agreement during the period from January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 has been made under my supervision.

 

(b)                                 To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the aforementioned period.

 

 

Dated March 17, 2014

 
|   | /s/ Erin M. Rohde                     |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Erin M. Rohde                         |
|   | Assistant Treasurer of                |
|   | Ford Motor Credit Company LLC,        |
|   | as Servicer of Ford Credit Auto Owner |
|   | Trust 2012-C                          |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Frances Spark, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: April 23, 2010



/s/ FRANCES R. SPARKFrances R. SparkChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as
filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  November 15, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Allan D. Ivie, IVName:
    Allan D. Ivie, IVTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
March 2, 2015

Via efile.txcourts.gov

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

Fifth District Court of Appeals

600 Commerce Street, Suite 200

Dallas, Texas 75202

Re: Cause No. 05-14-00130-CV; Kelley|Witherspoon, et al. v. Armstrong 

International Services, Inc.

Dear Ms. Matz:

I will be presenting oral argument for the appellee/cross appellant Armstrong 

International Services, Inc. in this case on Wednesday, March 18, 2015. 

	 	 	 	 	 	 Very truly yours,

						 /s/ Prater Monning

	 	 	 	 	 	 B. Prater Monning III

BPM/bg

cc: Christy Denison	 	 Via efile.tx.courts.gov

ACCEPTED

05-14-00130-CV

FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

DALLAS, TEXAS

3/2/2015 5:09:47 PM

LISA MATZ

CLERK

 FILED IN 5th COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 3/2/2015 5:09:47 PM LISA MATZ Clerk
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees 

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement 

System Insurance Program System 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Financial Management Letter 

Number: F-00-04 Date : August 11, 2000 

SUBJECT: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT INFORMATION IMPROVEMENTS 

As you know, we currently rely on the mail as our primary method of delivering Financial Management 

and Payroll Office Letters. This does not allow us to get often time-sensitive information to you as 

quickly as you need it. To address this, we will soon implement a new approach to deliver financial 

management and payroll information about the Federal employee benefit programs. 

Effective on January 1, 2001, our Payroll Office and Financial Management Letters will be replaced by a 

new letter called “Payroll and Financial Management Guidance.” “Payroll and Financial Management 

Guidance” will be issued as a Benefits Administration Letter in the 300 Series. Thus, the first issuance 

of “Payroll and Financial Management Guidance” will be Benefits Administration Letter No. 01-301. 

For your information, the chart below shows the Benefits Administration Letter structure: 

SERIES SUBJECT 

100 Retirement Policy and Process Issues 

200 Insurance Policy and Process Issues 

300 Payroll and Financial Management Guidance 

400 FEHB Open Season Guidance 

500 Reserved for Future Use 

600 Reserved for Future Use 

700 Miscellaneous Issues 

On January 1, 2001, we will also implement what we plan to be our primary method of delivering 

“Payroll and Financial Management Guidance”: the Financial and Payroll Information [“FIN-PAY”] online 

“mailing list.” FINPAY will automatically e-mail “Payroll and Financial Management Guidance” to those 

who subscribe to it. Subscribers will be able to choose to receive only “Payroll and Financial 

Management Guidance” or to receive all Benefits Administration Letters. We will provide information 

about how to subscribe to FINPAY in a future Financial Management Letter. “Payroll and Financial 

Management Guidance” will also be posted to the OPM website at http://www.opm.gov/asd/htm/bal1.htm. 
 

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees 

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement 

System Insurance Program System 

-2- 

Initially, we will continue to mail “Payroll and Financial Management Guidance” to all of the names on 

our Payroll Office and Financial Management Letter mailing lists. We plan, however, to stop mailing it 

as soon after January 2001 as practicable. We will base our decision on your feedback as to your ability 

to obtain the information from FIN-PAY. 

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us via email at 

finance@opm.gov. or on (202) 606-0606. 

 

 Robert A. Yuran, Chief 

 Financial Policy Staff 

 Retirement and Insurance Service
#### BLANKENSHIP v. STATE.

No. 18423.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 21, 1936.

Weldon F. Johnson, of Levelland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for operating a motor vehicle upon the public highways of this state with number plates attached thereto which had been issued for a different motor vehicle; penalty assessed at a fine of $50.

The prosecution arose under article 811, P.C., which reads as follows: “Whoever shall operate, or as owner permit to be operated upon a public highway a motor vehicle with a number plate or seal issued for a different motor vehicle attached thereto shall be fined not exceeding two hundred dollars.”

The information charged, among other things, that *“** * * the said motor vehicle so operated being then and there a Ford Truck of the following description: Motor No. 1018592 Ford Truck and the said number plate being then and there one issued for a Chev. Truck of the following description: Motor No. 3141114 Chev. Truck.”

The state’s case only shows that appellant operated a truck upon the streets of the city of Levelland in Hockley county," Tex., on or about the date fixed in the information, and that appellant had not registered his truck in that county for the year 1935. Appellant did not testify, and the above is the substance of the state’s testimony adduced upon the trial.

We are constrained to hold that the state’s case is not sufficient to support the conviction. There is no testimony that appellant resided in Hockley county, Tex., or that it was incumbent upon him under the law to register his truck in that county. There is no testimony that the truck which he was seen operating did not have the license numbers thereon, or that the license numbers on the truck were in fact not issued for that motor vehicle. Nor is there any testimony in support of the descriptive allegations of the information above referred to.

It is a rule of long standing that where the complaint contains descriptive averments the burden is upon the state to prove the averments as charged. Authorities will be found collated under section 498, Branch’s Annotated Penal Code of Texas.

Under the facts adduced, the state’s evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction. Having reached this conclusion, it is deemed unnecessary to pass upon the other matters appearing in the record.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 Date: September 14, 2007
    By:
    /s/ James P. DolanJames P. DolanChief Executive Officer