alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Street Address: 

950 West Ilosin Rood 

New Castle, DE 19720 

Moiling Address: 

P.O. Box 15505 

Wilmington, DE 19850 

(302) 324-2500 

18001 235-9100 

Fox Numbers: 

Accounting: 324-2554 

Circulation: 324-2945 

Cla"ified: 324-5511 

I'I.nm Res<uc:e>: 324-2578 

Info Systems: 324-2969 

Morketing: 324-2557 

News: 324-5509 

Retoil: 324-5518 

Legal Desk 302-324-2676 

Legal Fax 302-324-2249 

AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
 

State of Delaware 

Personally appeared before me this 22nd day of December, 2010. 

I, Kristin Segner, of The News Journal Company, a daily newspaper printed and published 

in the County of New Castle County, State of Delaware, who, being dUly sworn states that 

the advertisement of SID DNREC Division of Air Quality - Legal Notice Public Hearing 

was pUblished in The News Journal on December 22, 2010 

Legal Coordinator 

Name Title 

Sworn to before me this 22nd day of December, 2010 

., Janda James 

Notary ~Iolary Public Public 

state of Delaware 

."omillission expires 11/0212012
EXHIBIT 31.1**CERTIFICATION**I, Paul F. Miller, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Northern Border Pipeline Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  b) [intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date:  August 3, 2007 /s/ Paul F. Miller   Paul F. Miller   Principal Executive Officer, VicePresident and General Manager
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19
- 2385

KENNETH SMITH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Post Master General, United States Postal Service Agency , Defendant

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria

. Claude M. Hilton , Senior District Judge. ( 1:17

- cv
- 01097

- CMH

- MSN )

Submitted : December 3, 2020 Decided: December 8, 2020

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Kenneth Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublish ed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Smith appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to
Defendant on Smith’s second amended complaint raising a variety of constitutional and employment discriminatio n and retaliation claims . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment

. Smith v.
Brennan , No. 1:17

- cv
- 01097

- CMH

- MSN (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2019)

. We deny Smith’s
motion to strike the response brief, motion for a formal appeal, and motions to add exhibits. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Online Shipping Holdings
Corporation (the “Company”) on
Amendment No. 1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      August 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Jing YanName:
              Jing
      YanTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Principal Financial
                and
      Accounting Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Bancorp, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, (the Report) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert W. White, Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1)          
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
 the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               
| |                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (2)          
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
 respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| |                         
| | ------------------------
| | /s/ Robert
 W. White    
| |                         
| | Robert W.
 White        
| | Chairman,
 President and
| | Chief
 Executive Officer
| | May 9, 2008             

A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
SarbanesOxley Act has been provided to Abington Bancorp, Inc. and will be
retained by Abington Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

---
NUMBER 13-18-00069-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

DEVON ENERGY PRODUCTION COMPANY, Appellants,

L.P. ET AL.,

v.

MICHAEL A. SHEPPARD, ET AL., Appellees.

On appeal from the 24th District Court

of De Witt County, Texas.

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Hinojosa

Order Per Curiam

Appellants, Devon Energy Production Company, L.P., et al., attempt to appeal the 

trial court’s December 28, 2017 order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. 

Appellants have notified this Court that they believe the judgment is final and appealable 
2

but state that appellees, Michael A. Sheppard, et al., have raised the finality issue in the 

trial court via a motion for determination of their attorneys’ fees and entry of final judgment. 

To be final and appealable, a judgment must dispose of all issues and parties in 

the case. Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). It is unclear 

from the record before the Court if all claims asserted by or against all parties have been 

disposed. Under these circumstances, we may abate the appeal to permit clarification 

by the trial court. Id. at 206; see TEX. R. APP. P. 27.2, 44.3, 44.4.

Accordingly, we ABATE the appeal and REMAND the cause to the trial court for 

clarification. Upon remand, the trial court shall address whether it intended the judgment 

to completely dispose of all claims and all parties. The trial court shall cause its findings

and recommendations, together with any orders it may enter regarding the 

aforementioned issues, to be included in a supplemental clerk's record. Furthermore, 

the trial court shall cause a supplemental reporter's record of any proceedings to be 

prepared. The supplemental clerk's record and supplemental reporter's record, if any, 

shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court on or before the expiration of thirty days from the 

date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

28th day of March, 2018.
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 15439.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

John Mathis, Jr., of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is receiving and concealing stolen property; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

*619The record is before ns without a statement of facts or bills of exception. N-o question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 1627

In re: BARRY RICHARDSON , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

. ( 1:20

- cv - 00424

- CCE

- JLW )

Submitted : April 22, 2021 Decided: April 26, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE , Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion

. Barry Richardson , Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Barry Richardson , a North Carolina inmate, petitions for a writ of mandamus seeking an order directing two North Carolina Superior Court judges to grant his motions for appropriate relief and to amend discovery. We conclude tha t Richardson is not entitled to mandamus relief. Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct. , 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004) ; In re Murphy

- Brown,
LLC , 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018)

. F urther, mandamus relief is available only when the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy

- Brown , 907 F.3d at 795 . This court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. Superior Ct. of Mecklen burg Cnty. , 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969), and does not have jurisdiction to review final state court orders, D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman , 460 U.S. 462, 482 (1983). The relief sought by Richardson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

OMAR CARBALLO-DELGADO,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 09-10425

D.C. No. 5:08-cr-00512-JF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jeremy D. Fogel, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 13, 2010** 

Before: SILVERMAN, CALLAHAN, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

Omar Carballo-Delgado appeals his jury-trial conviction for illegal re-entry

following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. We have jurisdiction under

28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm. 

FILED

SEP 29 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-10425

Carballo-Delgado contends that we must vacate his conviction because the

penalty sheet accompanying his superseding indictment misstated the applicable

statutory maximum, and the district court did not advise Carballo-Delgado of the

correct statutory maximum when Carballo-Delgado was re-arraigned on this

indictment.

Even assuming, without deciding, that error occurred, Carballo-Delgado

cannot establish that substantial rights were affected. See United States v. Olano,

507 U.S. 725, 731-34 (1993) (describing plain error standard). The record does not

support Carballo-Delgado’s contention that, at the time he elected to proceed to

trial, he believed he faced a statutory maximum of ten years rather then twenty

years. Both the original information to which Carballo-Delgado pled not guilty

and the pre-plea investigative report requested and considered by the parties prior

to Carballo-Delgado’s re-arraignment included the correct statutory maximum. 

Carballo-Delgado therefore fails to establish “a reasonable probability that, but for

[the error claimed], the result of the proceeding would have been different.” 

United States v. Dominguez Benitez, 542 U.S. 74, 82 (2004) (citation omitted).

AFFIRMED.
##### 



(TRANSOCEAN LOGO)
    
    Transocean Inc.
Post Office Box 2765
Houston TX 77252 2765
  Analyst Contact:
    
    Gregory S. Panagos
713 232 7551Media Contact:
    
    Guy A. Cantwell
713 232 7647
 News Release  FOR RELEASE:
   TRANSOCEAN INC. ANNOUNCES FORMATION OF JOINT VENTURE TO OWN AND OPERATE TWO NEW ULTRA-DEEPWATER
DRILLSHIPS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION (CORRECTION)
    ###
    
    07-37
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3350 

To require a terrorism threat assessment regarding the transportation of 

chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological materials through United 

States land borders and within the United States, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. HIGGINS (for himself, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, and Mr. KING of 

New York) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 

A BILL 

To require a terrorism threat assessment regarding the 

transportation of chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological materials through United States land borders and 

within the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know the CBRN Ter5 rorism Threats to Transportation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TERRORISM THREAT ASSESSMENT. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

8 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of HomeVerDate Sep 11 2014 06:25 Aug 05, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3350.IH H3350

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3350 IH

1 land Security, acting through the Under Secretary of In2 telligence and Analysis, shall conduct a terrorism threat 

3 assessment of the transportation of chemical, biological, 

4 nuclear, and radiological materials through United States 

5 land borders and within the United States. 

6 (b) CONSULTATION.—In preparing the terrorism 

7 threat assessment required under subsection (a), the 

8 Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis shall con9 sult with the Administrator of the Transportation Security 

10 Administration, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and 

11 Border Protection, and the heads of other Federal depart12 ments and agencies, as appropriate, to ensure that such 

13 terrorism threat assessment is informed by current infor14 mation about homeland security threats. 

15 (c) DISTRIBUTION.—Upon completion of the ter16 rorism threat assessment required under subsection (a), 

17 the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis shall 

18 disseminate such terrorism threat assessment to Federal 

19 partners, including the Department of Transportation and 

20 the Department of Energy, and State and local partners, 

21 including the National Network of Fusion Centers. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 17

- 00474

- CR

Robert Lee Alexander Leatherwood

v. The State of Texas

On a ppeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County , Texas Trial Cause No. A

- 14

- 5025

- 2

- CR

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having c onsidered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. March 29, 2018
___________________________________________________________________________________________ Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement System Insurance Program System 

United States        Office of  Personnel Management The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency  

  Retirement and Insurance Service 

Payroll Office Letter                                                     Number: P-00-25                                                                                      Date : October 17, 2000 

        SUBJECT:  FEHB Clearinghouse   Management control over the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB) depends to a great extent on the existence of an effective enrollment reconciliation process between agencies and participating carriers.  Currently, the enrollment reconciliation process is based upon the quarterly enrollment reports that you submit to the FEHB carriers that cover your employees.  The carriers will contact you if they conclude that their enrolment records differ from yours.    To enhance the reconciliation process and eliminate this cumbersome procedure, we have recently contracted with the National Finance Center (NFC) to develop and maintain the “FEHB Clearinghouse.”  Under the Clearinghouse concept, both FEHB carriers and payroll offices will submit enrollment data to NFC.  NFC will, in turn, reconcile the two sets of data and generate reports of discrepancies with the probable corrective action.   We believe that by involving you in the Clearinghouse development process from the onset, we can better assure its successful implementation.  Therefore, we are seeking payroll officials to work with us, NFC, and representatives from the FEHB carrier community to develop the systemic, policy and procedural requirements that will underlie the Clearinghouse.   If you would like to help us develop the Clearinghouse, please email us at finance@opm.gov or contact Kenneth Harris of this office directly.  Mr. Harris can be emailed at ktharris@opm.gov or reached on 202-606-4851.   

Robert A. Yuran, Chief Financial Policy Staff Retirement and Insurance Service 

mailto:finance@opm.gov

mailto:ktharris@opm.gov
# Official Journal C 275/10 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 275 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4710 November 2004 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 275

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4710 November 2004

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2004/C 275/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2004/C 275/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3597 — Europcar/TUI/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2004/C 275/3 | Commission Opinion of 27 October 2004 within the framework of Council Directive 73/23/EEC relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits — Safety of tanning devices for cosmetic purposes (1) | 3 |
| 2004/C 275/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3613 — TECHINT/STELLA/JAMES JONES/INVESTINDUSTRIAL/CLESSIDRA/SIRTI) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 6 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2004/C 275/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2004/C 275/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3597 — Europcar/TUI/JV) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2004/C 275/3

Commission Opinion of 27 October 2004 within the framework of Council Directive 73/23/EEC relating to electrical equipment designed for use within certain voltage limits — Safety of tanning devices for cosmetic purposes (1)

3

2004/C 275/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3613 — TECHINT/STELLA/JAMES JONES/INVESTINDUSTRIAL/CLESSIDRA/SIRTI) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

6

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2004/C 275/5 | 1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex! | s3 |

2004/C 275/5

1 November 2004 — New version of EUR-Lex!

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 09-307 Date: October 2009 

Subject: FEHBP Cost Factor for First Quarter of FY 2010 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program (FEHBP) for the first quarter of FY 2010. A quarterly cost factor will also be provided to 

you for the second and third quarters of the fiscal year. The annual imputed cost factors for all 

civilian benefit programs will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2010. 

The FEHBP cost factor for the first quarter of FY 2010 is $1,360. 

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. Additionally, you may contact us on 202-606-0606. 

Keith Willingham 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Center for Financial Services