alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3354 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release 

date for certain nonviolent offenders, to amend title 18, United States 

Code, with respect to the computation of the good time credit toward 

service of sentences of imprisonment, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Ms. JACKSON LEE (for herself and Mr. CONYERS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an alternate release date for certain nonviolent offenders, to 

amend title 18, United States Code, with respect to 

the computation of the good time credit toward service 

of sentences of imprisonment, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Prison Bureau 

5 Relief Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3354 IH

1 SEC. 2. EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT OF2 FENDERS. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3624 of title 18, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ‘‘at the early 

6 release date provided in subsection (g), if applicable, 

7 or otherwise’’ after ‘‘A prisoner shall be released by 

8 the Bureau of Prisons’’; and 

9 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(g) EARLY RELEASE FOR CERTAIN NONVIOLENT

11 OFFENDERS.—Notwithstanding any other provision of 

12 law, the Bureau of Prisons, pursuant to a good time pol13 icy, shall release from confinement a prisoner who has 

14 served one-half or more of his term of imprisonment (in15 cluding any consecutive term or terms of imprisonment) 

16 if that prisoner— 

17 ‘‘(1) has attained the age of 45 years; 

18 ‘‘(2) has never been convicted of a crime of vio19 lence; and 

20 ‘‘(3) has not engaged in any violation, involving 

21 violent conduct, of institutional disciplinary regula22 tions.’’. 

23 SEC. 3. GOOD TIME CREDIT. 

24 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 3624(b)(1) of title 18, 

25 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘, beyond the 

26 time served, of up to 54 days at the end of each year of 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3354 IH

1 the prisoner’s term of imprisonment, beginning at the end 

2 of the first year of the term,’’ and inserting ‘‘of up to 54 

3 days for each year of the prisoner’s sentence imposed by 

4 the court,’’. 

5 (b) RESTORATION OF CREDIT.—Section 3624(b)(1) 

6 is amended by striking the sentence beginning ‘‘Credit 

7 that has not been earned’’ and inserting ‘‘The Bureau may 

8 subsequently restore any or all credit previously denied, 

9 based on the prisoner’s maintaining good behavior as de10 termined by the Bureau.’’. 

11 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this 

12 section apply with respect to each prison sentence that has 

13 not been completed before the date of the enactment of 

14 this Act, except any sentence imposed before November 

15 1, 1987. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### NEAL v. STATE.

(No. 12521.)

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 8, 1929.

T. J. Sanders, of Spur, for appellant.

A. A. Dawson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*49MORROW, P. J.

The offense is murder; punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of 35 years.

The evidence developed upon the trial is not before this court.

 Complaint is made of the refusal of the court to continue the case upon the motion of the appellant. The court explained his refusal with the statement that the witness because of whose absence the application was sought was under indictment for the same offense as the appellant, and was therefore disqualified to give testimony in behalf of the appellant. One charged with the same offense as the accused .on trial is not a competent witness in behalf of the accused. See C. C. P. 1925, art. 711; P. C. 1925, art. 82. It may be added, however, that in the absence of a statement showing the facts that were introduced upon the trial, this court would be unable to appraise the merits of the motion for a continuance.

The judgment is affirmed.
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23

- 1488

In re: MACK M. ROBINSON

,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland

, at Baltimore . (1:21

- cv

- 01730

- PJM)

Submitted : June 15, 2023 Decided: June 21, 2023

Before DIAZ, RICHARDSON, and HEYTENS , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mack M. Robinson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 23-1488 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:

Mack M. Robinson petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court

has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He seeks an order from this

court directing the district court to act. The present record does not reveal undue delay in

the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral

argument because t he facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 23-1488 Doc: 9 Filed: 06/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
#### WEAVER v. STATE.

No. 20886.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 6, 1940.

Rehearing Denied April 17, 1940.

M. M. Guinn, of Rusk, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the County Court of Cherokee County on the 7th of June, 1939, after a trial to the court without a jury and was assessed a fine of $250.

The record in this case shows that Bill Brunt, the sheriff, made a search of the premises of appellant on September 21, 1938, known as Rockwood Inn and which was his private residence. It was situated on the highway three and one-half miles north of Rusk. The witness had a search warrant issued upon proper affidavit as disclosed by the record. As a result of the search they found four one-half pints of liquor and one full-pint of liquor, tax paid. The liquor was whisky. It was located in the Rockwood Inn and was the property of the appellant.

Appellant did not testify for himself and produced no witnesses.

The appellant in this case is the same person as in Joe Weaver v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 138 S.W.2d 1081, this day decided, and the facts are the sanie save and except as to dates and amounts of whisky involved. The conclusion in that case is adopted as the proper conclusion and finding of this court in this case.

The judgment of the County Court is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The matters herein asserted by appellant in his motion for a rehearing are identical with those urged by him in Joe Weaver v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 138 S.W.2d 1081, and for the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the motion in this case is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80857]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22941]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-172-2024]


Foreign-Trade Zone 40; Application for Subzone; Permco, Inc.; 
Montville and Streetsboro, Ohio

    An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) 
Board by the Cleveland Cuyahoga County Port Authority, grantee of FTZ 
40, requesting subzone status for the facilities of Permco, Inc., 
located in Montville and Streetsboro, Ohio. The application was 
submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as 
amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 
CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on September 30, 2024.
    The proposed subzone would consist of the following sites: Site 1 
(2.33 acres) 1500 Frost Road, Streetsboro; and Site 2 (0.54 acres) 
16445 Gar Highway, Montville. No authorization for production activity 
has been requested at this time. The proposed subzone would be subject 
to the existing activation limit of FTZ 40.
    In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Juanita Chen of the 
FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make 
recommendations to the Executive Secretary.
    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions 
shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f197858bb18583909594df969e87"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="6b0d1f112b1f190a0f0e450c041d">[email protected]</span></a>. The closing period for their receipt is November 13, 
2024. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the 
foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period 
to November 29, 2024.
    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection 
in the ``Online FTZ Information Section'' section of the FTZ Board's 
website, which is accessible via www.trade.gov/ftz.
    For further information, contact Juanita Chen at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#deb4abbfb0b7aabff0bdb6bbb09eaaacbfbabbf0b9b1a8"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9c3dcc8c7c0ddc887cac1ccc7e9dddbc8cdcc87cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 30, 2024.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-22941 Filed 10-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### CARNES v. STATE.

No. 20641.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 6, 1939.

Rehearing Withdrawn Jan. 10, 1940.

W. C. Baker and Jim Weatherby, both of Kerrville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was charged with driving an automobile while drunk, and upon conviction was fined $500 and sentenced to serve thirty days in jail.

The testimony abundantly shows him to have been intoxicated at the time of an unfortunate accident in which his car struck a pick-up and trailer, causing the death of a man and a nineteen months old baby.

There are six bills of exceptions in the record, all of which were properly refused by the learned trial judge, nor were any bystanders’ bills taken.

There was also alleged in the motion for a new trial certain misconduct of the jury, and same was attempted to be set forth in a statement of facts proven on the hearing of such motion. This statement consists, in its entirety, of questions and answers thereto, and therefore we can not consider same. Russell v. State, 120 Tex.Cr.R. 425, 44 S.W.2d 727; Wright v. State, 101 Tex.Cr.R. 503, 276 S.W. 259; Wooten v. State, 121 Tex.Cr.R. 462, 50 S.W.2d 834.

There are no errors presented to us for review. Under the facts, we can only say that we are impressed with the fact that appellant has no grounds upon which to complain of the verdict of the jury, as the proof offered by the State would amply support a much more onerous punishment. *1053The charge of the court seems to admirably present all phases of the law raised by the evidence, and we find no objections thereto in the record.

. Finding no error herein, the judgment is affirmed.

On Affidavit to Withdraw Motion for Rehearing.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

The judgment was affirmed on the 6th day of December, 1939. On December IS, 1939 a motion for rehearing was filed. On the 3d day of January, 1940, appellant filed in this court his affidavit advising that he desired to withdraw his motion for rehearing and permit the judgment of affirmance to become final. The request of appellant is granted and the clerk of this court is directed to issue mandate on the original judgment of affirmance.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and
represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of August 15, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander
Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC.By:

/s/ Andrew KangName:

Andrew KangTitle:

Executive Vice President Capital Markets
and TreasurerDate:

March 30, 2017By:

/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 30, 2017
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the hhgregg, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J.B. Van der Wiel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Donald J.B. Van der WielDonald J.B. Van der WielChief Financial Officer


Dated: November 14, 2007
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DERRICK S. CLEMONS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 219 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of October, 2018

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

August 3, 2017

No. 04

- 15

- 00688

- CV

IN THE ESTATE OF CARLOS AGUILAR, DECEASED,

From the County Court at Law No 2, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PB4

- 000048 L2

Honorable Jesus Garza, Ju dge Presiding



### O R D E R

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice 1

The panel has considered the A ppellee ’ s Motion for Rehearing, and the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed th e seal of the said

court on this 3rd day of August, 2017

.

___________________________________ Luz Estrada

Chief Deputy Clerk

1 Dissents to the denial of the motion for rehearing without requesting a response. See Tex. R. App. P

. 49.2.
# C_2012029EN.01000801.xml

| 2.2.2012 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 29/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.2.2012

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 29/8

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.6444 — Terrena/Lyonnaise Des Eaux/JV)

(Text with EEA relevance)

2012/C 29/05

On 27 January 2012, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the Competition website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6444. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/en/index.htm) under document number 32012M6444. EUR-Lex is the on-line access to the European law.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 169 (Friday, August 30, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53754-53755]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-21276]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9010-8]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information (202) 564-7146 or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed 08/19/2013 
through 08/23/2013
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public 
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment 
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html

EIS No. 20130250, Draft EIS, USACE, FL, Central Everglades Planning 
Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/15/2013, Contact: Gretchen Ehlinger 
904 232-1682.
EIS No. 20130251, Final EIS, USFS, MN, BWCAW Non-native Invasive Plant 
Management Project, Review Period Ends: 10/15/2013, Contact: Jack 
Greenlee 218-229-8817.
EIS No. 20130252, Final EIS, USN, CA, Hawaii-Southern California 
Training and Testing, Review Period Ends: 09/30/2013, Contact: Cory 
Scott 808-472-1420.
EIS No. 20130253, Final EIS, USN, 00, Atlantic Fleet Training and 
Testing, Review Period Ends: 09/30/2013, Contact: Lesley Dobbins 757-
322-4645.
EIS No. 20130254, Draft EIS, USFS, UT, Smiths Fork Vegetation 
Restoration Project, Comment Period Ends: 10/15/2013, Contact: Pete 
Gomben 801-999-2182.
EIS No. 20130255, Draft EIS, NOAA, 00, Amendment 7 to the 2006 
Consolidated Atlantic Highly Migratory Species (HMS) Fishery Management 
Plan (FMP), Comment

[[Page 53755]]

Period Ends: 10/23/2013, Contact: Thomas A Warren 978-281-9260.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20130087, Draft EIS, BLM, NM, TriCounty Resource Management 
Plan, Comment Period Ends: 09/12/2013, Contact: Jennifer Montoya 575-
525-4316.

    Revision to FR Notice Published 04/12/2013; Extending Comment 
Period from 07/11/2013 to 09/12/2013.

    Dated: August 27, 2013.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013-21276 Filed 8-29-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
EX-34.7
(logo) Grant Thornton


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


Grant Thornton LLP
1717 Main Street, Suite 1500
Dallas, TX 75201-4667

T 214.561.2300
F 214.561.2370
GrantThornton.com
linkd.in/GrantThorntonUS
twitter.com/GrantThorntonUS

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Situs Holdings, LLC

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Report of
Management on Compliance ("Management's Assertion"), that Situs Holdings LLC
(the "Company") complied with certain servicing criteria set forth in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Regulation
AB included in Appendix A as of December 31, 2012 and for the period June 1,
2012 through December 31, 2012, with respect to the Company's Operating or
Trust Advisor Services performed over the deals listed in Appendix B (the
"Platform"). Management is responsible for the Company's compliance with
the applicable servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on management's assertion about the Company's compliance with the applicable
servicing criteria for the Platform based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and,
accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's
compliance with the applicable servicing criteria for the Services and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the
circumstances. Our examination was not designed to detect material
noncompliance that may have occurred prior to the period covered by this report
and that may have affected the Company's activities with respect to the
Platform during the period covered by this report. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on the Company's compliance with the
applicable servicing criteria.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Situs Holdings LLC complied with
the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of December 31, 2012 and for
the period June 1, 2012 through December 31, 2012, for the Services is fairly
stated, in all material respects.


/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 22, 2013

Grant Thornton LLP
U.S. member firm of Grant Thornton International Ltd