alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### STATE v. NEAL BROS. HARDWARE, Inc., et al.

No. 8630.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 3, 1931.

Rehearing Denied July 1, 1931.

James V. Allred and Sidney Benbow, both of Austin, and George R. Gillette, of San Antonio, for the State.

Wm. H. Russell, John James, and Leonard Brown, all of San Antonio, for appellees.

COBBS, J.

The state of Texas, appellant, filed this suit against appellee Neal Bros. Hardware, Inc., to forfeit its charter for failure to make due payment of its capital stock, and prayed for judgment against defendant canceling and declaring null and void the charter of the defendant corporation. On November 27, 19-29, H. A. Neal and Ira E. Neal filed tbeir answer. On January 3, 1930, Neal Bros. Hardware, Inc., filed its original answer. About eleven months thereafter, H. D. Neal filed a plea in abatement and pleaded in his proper person a,nd as former president of Neal Bros. Hardware, Inc., a private corporation. It presented as grounds: “(1) The alleged voluntary dissolution of defendant corporation, which dissolution was purported to have been effected on November 23, 1929, and after the filing of plaintiff’s suit. (2) That on or about December 28, 1928, the corporation, Neal Brothers Hardware, Inc., filed-its. voluntary petition in bankruptcy in .the District Court of the United States; that thereupon said corporation was duly adjudged a bankrupt and by reason thereof the defendant was duly adjudged and ascertained to be insolvent, and, for such reason, was automatically dissolved.”

Appellant filed its first amended original petition on December 18, 1930, setting up practically the same allegations as the original petition, but omitting its alternative prayer for mere forfeiture and cancellation, and attached thereto a copy of the charter together with várious exhibits and affidavits.

■ On December 19, 1930, appellees’ plea in abatement came on for hearing, and the court sustained the plea and dismissed the suit.

It is recited in the judgment that the court heard the matters submitted in connection therewith, and sustained said plea. It will be presumed, in the absence of findings of fact or statement of facts, that the court had properly before it sufficient facts adduced in evidence to sustain the action of the trial court. Such was also-submitted in its motion for a new trial and again considered by the co-urt, who overruled • the same, conclusively showing sufficient facts were before the trial court to warrant his action.

We think all the questions involved in this case are moot. Prior to the time of filing *229this suit by the state to forfeit the charter of said company the corporation had voluntarily surrendered to the state its charter, besides the same had also been surrendered in a bankrupt proceeding. ■

We can see no good reason to continue this case by a reversal, which would mean that it be sent back for another trial for forfeiture, when that has been done voluntarily by the corporation#itself, as well as through the bankrupt proceeding. Courts do not do useless things.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Goldfields Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Raymond Threlkeld,
      President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) of the
      Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      November 4, 2008




By:/s/
                Raymond ThrelkeldRaymond
                ThrelkeldPresident
                and
                Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,I, Manuel G. Estrada, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:1. To my knowledge, this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. To my knowledge, the information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1)fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations ofInternational Shipholding Corporation as of May 15, 2007.                                                          /s/ Manuel G. Estrada   Manuel G. Estrada  Date: May 15, 2007 *Chief Financial Officer*
#### Cap TAYLOR v. STATE.

No. 17687.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

McKinney & Berry, of Cooper, for appellant.

Lloyd W.' Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This cause is one pending upon the dockets of this court wherein the accused is charged with the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, the prosecution being under the Dean Law (Pen. Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in an opinion this day handed down in Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the motion for rehearing is granted, the judgment of affirmance is set aside, the opinion rendered is withdrawn, and the judgment is now reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
ATTACHMENT 1 – FEDVIP 

TABLE 1 

DENTAL PLAN NAME CHANGE 

Area 2009 Plan Name (Old) 2010 Plan Name (New) 

Puerto Rico Triple-S Triple-S Salud 

1
# ORNL Review v36n1 2003.pdf

### 60 Years of Great Science

                      - 60 Years of Great Science 
                      - Nuclear Power and Research Reactors 
                      - Discovery of Promethium 
                      - Nuclear Isotopes 
                      - Nuclear Medicine 
                      - Nuclear Fuel Processes & Software 
                      - Nuclear Fuel Designs 
                      - Nuclear Safety 
                      - Nuclear Desalination 
                      - Nuclear Nonproliferation 
                      - Neutron Scattering 
                      - Semiconductors & Superconductors 
                      - Ion-Implanted Joints 
                      - Environmental Impact Analysis 
                      - Environmental Quality 
                      - Space Exploration 
                      - Graphite & Carbon Products 
                      - Advanced Materials: Alloys 
                      - Advanced Materials: Ceramics 
                      - Biological Systems 
                      - Computational Biology 
                      - Biomedical Technologies 
                      - Intelligent Machines 
                      - Health Physics & Radiation Dosimetry 
                      - Radiation Shielding 
                      - Information Centers 
                      - Energy Efficiency: Cooling & Heating 
                      - Energy Efficiency: Buildings 
                      - Chemistry & Mass Spectrometry 
                      - Nuclear Physics & Astrophysics 
                      - High-Performance Computing 
                      - Software Simulations 
                      - Geographic Information Systems 
                      - Transportation Logistics 
                      - Biomass Energy 
                      - Fusion Energy 
                      - Technology Transfer 
                      - UT-ORNL Partnership 
                      - Science Education 
                      - Waste Management 
                      - Government Policies 

Download Document
**CERTIFICATION**

Re: 

**MorganStanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C5, Commercial**

**MortgagePass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C5**(the"Transaction"), issued pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2012 (the"Pooling and Servicing Agreement"), executed in connection with the Transaction (capitalizedterms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and ServicingAgreement). 

__________________________________________

I,Steven Stern, certify that: 

1. 

I havereviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required

to befiled in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K ofMorgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C5 (the "Exchange Act periodicreports"); 

2. 

Basedon my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole,do 

notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. 

Basedon my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and otherinformation 

requiredto be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report isincluded in the Exchange Act periodic reports; 

4. 

Basedon my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required inthis 

reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in theExchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreement(s) in all material respects; and 

5. 

All ofthe reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria forasset-

backedsecurities and their related attestation reports on assessment ofcompliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 havebeen included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in thisreport on Form 10-K. 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied oninformation provided to me 

by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: 

-U.S.Bank National Association, as trustee and certificate administrator 

-WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as custodian 

-Bankof America, National Association, as master servicer 

-KeyBankNational Association, as master servicer 

-MidlandLoan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as special servicer and primary servicer 

2 

-SitusHoldings, LLC, as trust advisor 

-BerkadiaCommercial Mortgage LLC, as a sub-servicer 

Date: April 14, 2014 

By : /s/ Steven Stern           Name: Steven Stern Title: President
EXHIBIT
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Winland Online Shipping Holdings
Corporation (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to his
knowledge:




1.           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.




Date:
      August 14, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Jing YanName:
              Jing
      YanTitle:
              Chief
      Financial Officer and Principal Financial
                and
      Accounting Officer





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the
Company and furnished to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert R. Binns, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aviation Holdings Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

b)    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: August 15,   2011 | By:    | /s/ Robert   R. Binns |
|-----------------------------------|--------|----------------------------|
|                              |   | Robert   R. Binns          |
|                              |   | Chief   Executive Officer  |

 

1

----
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month
period ending January 31, 2009 of Techs Loanstar, Inc., a Nevada corporation
(the "Company"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Gary Pizzacalla, Chairman, President
and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
          13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operation of the Company.


/s/ GARY PIZZACALLA
___________________
Gary Pizzacalla
President, Secretary Treasurer,
Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Director


Date: March 9, 2008
United States Office of Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 22-305 Date: March 2022 

Subject: March 2022 Headcount 

This is a reminder for all payroll providers, including cross-service providers 

(e.g. National Finance Center (NFC), Defense Finance and Accounting 

Service (DFAS), etc.), to submit the semi-annual Headcount for the March 

2022 reporting period no later than March 31, 2022. 

The semi-annual Headcount reporting (March and September) provides OPM 

with a snapshot of agency-wide enrollment for participants in the Civil 

Service Retirement System (CSRS), Federal Employees Retirement System 

(FERS), Federal Employees Retirement System – Revised Annuity Employees 

(FERS-RAE), Federal Employees Retirement System – Further Revised 

Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE), Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) 

Program, and/or the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) 

Program. 

The March 2022 Headcount reporting period is for payroll paid during the 

first 15 days of March for semi-monthly and bi-weekly pay cycles. For 

monthly pay cycles, the reporting period is February 1 through February 28, 

2022. 

Note: All Payroll providers are required to use OPM’s Headcount Collection 

System (HCS) to input data and submit OPM Forms 1523 and 2812A 

electronically. HCS also provides an electronic upload feature using a 

standardized template. 
Benefits Administration Letter 22-305 

2 

For questions about the new electronic collection process, please contact the 

Headcount Support Team at HeadcountSupport@opm.gov. 

Headcount reports must be submitted no later than March 31, 2022. If 

report submission delays or difficulties are anticipated, please call Ms. Yadira 

Vega at 202-606-4842, Olayla Ruffin at 202-606-1498, Eirk Brown 202-606-

1418 or email fundsmanagement@opm.gov. 

Note: Standard Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) reports 

should not be delayed because Headcount submissions are not 

ready/complete. 

Sincerely, 

Sherri Jordan 

Associate Chief Financial Officer
#### SOUTH TEXAS BANK & TRUST CO. v. COCKE.

No. 9489.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 2, 1934.

Rehearing Denied June 13, 1934.

W. D. Masterson, Jr., and Terrell, Davis, Hall & Clemens, all of San Antonio, for appellant.

E. B. Cocke, of' San Antonio, for appel-lee.

FLY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellee against appellant, on December 4, 1933. Afterwards appellee applied for and obtained a temporary writ of injunction to prevent the sale of certain mortgaged property under the provisions of the act known as the Moratorium Law, which became effective May 1, 1933 (Acts 1933, c. 102 [Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2218b]). That law in substance provides that it shall be applicable to all suits pending at the time the act became effective and to all suits that might be filed during the time the law is effective; that is, one hundred and eighty days from the time it became effective. In this case appellee applied for a temporary writ of injunction to restrain the sale of certain property under and by virtue of a deed of trust executed by him on certain property. The injunction was granted on February 20, 1934, a temporary restraining order having been granted theretofore and the case set for hearing on the above date.

At the time that the suit was filed, on December 4, 1933, two hundred and eighteen days had passed since the act went into effect; that is, the suit was filed thirty-eight days after the time to which the law was limited and eighteen days after the two hundred days provided for in the act in which x'elief might be obtained. At the time the action was filed there was no law under which appellee could obtain a writ of injunction merely for the purpose of delaying the sale of the property. The writ, however, was applied for under the terms of the Moratorium Act which became effective May 1, 1933, and at a time when that act by its very terms had ceased to exist. The merits of the case must be fixed by the terms of that law. Under the circumstances the judgment must necessarily be reversed and the cause dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.
DuPont Ctmicals 8 Fkoroprodkxts Ctestnut Run Pbza 702 1276-E 4417 lancaster Pare ViFiningtan. DE 19805 LISA 

# aU pONT

~ 

## DuPortf CIienlicals & Tluoropi - oduct - s DeCelnber 12, 2011 U.S. Environinental Proteetion Agency Oflice of di,ir and Radiation Stratospheric Proteetion Dix°ision Attention: Margaret Sheppard >3Z o L Street NN4', iotk Floor (Room 1029) Washington, DC 20005 Dear Ms Sheppard: Reference: DuPont SNAP Information Notice

(Z)-1,1,1,4,4,4-hexafluoro-but-2-ene (CAS RN 6 9 2- 49 - 9)

Original filed response

Chestnut Run Plaza 702/1276-E, Witmington, DE 19805 E.1. du Pont de Nemours and CompanyPlease contact me if you have any questions about this submission or need further darification.

Sincerely,
Via Federal Express