alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b)
      AND 15d-14(b)**




**(Section 906
      of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)**





Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
      Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
      undersigned officers of Yongye Biotechnology International, Inc.. (the
“Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:





The
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 of the
      Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
      section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
      information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                November 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Zishen WuZishen
                WuPresident
                and CEODated:
                November 13, 2008
            By:
            /s/
                Larry GilmoreLarry
                GilmorePrincipal
                Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION

OF PRINCIPAL
EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF

THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Electronic Cigarettes International Group, Ltd. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30,
2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Daniel J. O'Neill,
Chief Executive Officer of Electronic Cigarettes International Group, Ltd., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|Date: November 15, 2016 | By: | /s/ Daniel J. O'Neill        
|----------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                        |     | Daniel J. O'Neill            
|                        |     | Chief Executive Officer      
|                        |     | (Principal Executive Officer)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-14-00009-CV

DAVE & BUSTER’S INC.,

Appellant

v.

Sammy SHALABI,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 388436

Honorable David J. Rodriguez, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: January 29, 2014

DISMISSED

In this appeal, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal with prejudice. Their 

motion states they have resolved the underlying case to their satisfaction. They move this court to 

dismiss this appeal with each party to bear its own attorney’s fees and costs of court. 

The parties’ joint motion is granted; this appeal is dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(2), 43.2(f); Caballero v. Heart of Texas Pizza, L.L.C., 70 S.W.3d 180, 181 (Tex. 2001) 

(per curiam). 

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22979]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the 
Cardiovascular and Respiratory Sciences Integrated Review Group, 
Therapeutic Development and Preclinical Studies Study Section, October 
23, 2024, 08:00 a.m. to October 24, 2024, 07:00 p.m., Embassy Suites at 
the Chevy Chase Pavilion, 4300 Military Road NW, Washington, DC 20015, 
which was published in the Federal Register on September 25, 2024, FR 
Doc. No. 2024-21898, 89 FR 78319.
    This meeting is being amended to change the meeting format from a 
hybrid meeting (in-person and virtual) to in-person only. The meeting 
is closed to the public.

    Dated: October 1, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-22979 Filed 10-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nine Mile Software, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael Christensen, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/   Michael Christensen





Michael Christensen


Principal Accounting Officer


May 4, 2011











A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED September 29, 2004 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-60914 Summary Calendar

TAJUDDIN PYARALI SURANI; LAILA TAJUDDIN SURANI; ZOHRA TAJUDDIN SURANI; NAILA SURANI, Petitioners,

versus JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA Nos. A76 775 586 A76 775 587 A76 775 588 A76 775 589

-------------------- Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and PICKERING, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Tajuddin Pyarali Surani, Laila Tajuddin Surani, Zohra Tajuddin Surani, and Naila Surani petition for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ’s) decision to deny their applications for asylum, and withholding of removal under the Immigration andNo. 03-60914 -2- Nationality Act (INA), and withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The Suranis contend that the BIA’s procedure of summarily affirming the IJ’s decision without opinion violated their due process rights. This argument is without merit. Soadjede v. Ashcroft , 324 F.3d 830, 832-33 (5th Cir. 2003). The Suranis also assert that the IJ overlooked their showing of past persecution and so erroneously held them to the “more likely than not” standard of 8 C.F.R. § 208.16(b)(1)(iii). The three incidents outlined in the Suranis’ testimony before the IJ do not constitute past persecution. See Mikhael v. INS , 115 F.3d 299, 304 & n.4 (5th Cir. 1997). Hence, the record does not compel a conclusion contrary to the BIA’s determination.
See Carbajal-Gonzalez v. INS , 78 F.3d 194, 195 (5th Cir. 1996).
PETITION DENIED.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6323** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. KENNETH D. BEVERLY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Richmond
. Henry E. Hudson , District Judge. ( 3:05

- cr - 00526

- HEH

- 1; 3:13

- cv - 00060 )

Submitted : June 13, 3013 Decided: June 17, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Kenneth D. Beverly, Appellant Pro Se. Steven T. Buck, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Gregg Robert Nivala, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Richmond, Virginia, for App ellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Kenneth D. Beverly seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his Fed. R. Crim. P. 36 motion as a 28
U.S.C. A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) m otion , and denying it as successive
. Because we find that the district court correctly construed the motion, t he order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (2006) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006)
. When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would f ind that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and concl ude that Beverly has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral3 argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate ly presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
#### Midboro Management, Landlord, *v.*J. Coleman Scal, Tenant.

Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Manhattan,

October 25, 1957.

*1099*Arthur T. Kaplan*for landlord.

*Millard Greene*for tenant.

Eugene M. McCarthy, J.

On June 16,1955, the landlord and tenant entered into a written agreement discontinuing a landlord-tenant holdover proceeding and agreeing to enter into an agreement in respect to the premises.

This agreement set forth the following clause: “3. The tenant, being in possession under an expired lease, agrees to vacate, in any event, at noon on September 30th, 1957 and to terminate his occupancy of the premises at such time. This agreement to vacate shall be void in the event tenant cancels and terminates lease to be entered into subsequent to the signing of this agreement, pursuant to agreement fixing a reasonable rent.”

On June 17, 1955 the parties executed a lease to the premises for the period July 1,1955 to September 30, 1957.

At the expiration of the lease the tenant continued in possession and the landlord brought this holdover proceeding. The landlord’s position is that in compliance with subdivision (g) of section 8 of the Emergency Business Space Bent Control Law (L. 1945, ch. 314, as amd.), the agreement of June 16, 1955, executed while the tenant was a statutory tenant, is a separate independent agreement which survives the lease of June 17, 1955. In support of this position there is cited *R & K Corp.*v. *Kenmont Hat Co.*(2 A D 2d 41). The plaintiff in the *R & K Corp.*v. *Kenmont Hat Co. (supra)*brought an action at law for money due pursuant to a written agreement executed prior to a lease between the parties whereby the defendant, who was a statutory tenant at the time of the agreement, stipulated, amongst other things, to pay the plaintiff a specified amount of money to forego its demand for the premises of the defendant for its own use.

The court upheld this agreement, stating (p. 45): “ Execution of the lease did not effect a merger, the lease not being as broad *1100in scope or comprehensive in terms as the oral agreement.” The action, however, did not involve the Emergency Business Space Control Law, and therefore, would not he applicable to these proceedings.

The agreement of June 16, 1955 would be effective if the statutory tenancy continued, but Avhen the tenant went into possession under the lease on July 1, 1955 his statutory tenancy came to a close and he was no longer in possession by virtue of the rent Iuavs, but as a result of the lease. He therefore comes within the second part of subdivision (g) of section *8*with respect to unexpired leases so that an agreement to vacate must be in writing “by agreement executed not less than three months after the commencement of the term thereof”. *(Olympic Assets*v. *Hatch & Co.,*1 Misc 2d 653, 654, 655.)

After trial and on the merits, final order is therefore aAvarded the tenant dismissing the petition.
Contains TSCA CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (7407M) TSCA Data processing Center-CBIC, Room 6428 1201 Constitution Ave. NW Washington, DC 20004-3302 Date Jan 30, 2015 Re: eTSCA PMN Submission via CDX PC number: 7240 TS number : 59B22R To whom it may concern: {cbi starts here

cbi ends here} Thank you for your assistance. We trust that you wi ll find this information useful. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, Yvon Durant, PhD Chief Technology Officer, Itaconix Corporation Direct: 1-603-686-7548 Fax: 1-603-617-4581 yvon.durant@itaconix.com

2 Marin Way Page 1 Stratham, New Hampshire 03885 603-775-4400
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 06-204 Date: July 18, 2006

Subject: Flexibilities in Employee Benefit Programs, including the FEHB, FLTCIP, 

FSAFEDS and FEGLI Programs 

Purpose

On May 9, 2006, President George W. Bush announced the Implementation Plan for the 

National Strategy for Pandemic Influenza. While there is no evidence or indication at this time 

it will adversely impact the Federal community or the U.S. populace at large, it is important to be 

prepared for any eventuality. Since our paramount concern is the health and security of Federal 

employees, we are providing you with a brief update on employee benefits programs. You will 

hear more from us in the near future on preparations for a possible pandemic. 

 

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHB) 

FEHB carriers are asked to demonstrate maximum flexibility under their OPM contract, 

including the following: 

• We expect fee-for-service carriers to relax certain provisions such as their precertification requirement the plan must be notified within two business days of an 

emergency admission. 

• We expect fee-for-service carriers and HMOs to relax requirements about notification 

and levels of benefit payment if victims are taken to non-plan and/or non-PPO hospitals 

or other treatment centers. 

• We expect all carriers to make certain FEHB members get additional supplies of 

medications as backup for emergency situations if necessary. 

Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP)

Those enrolled in FLTCIP should contact Long Term Care Partners at 1-800-582-3337 if they 

have any questions about how a crisis may affect their coverage, eligibility for benefits, or 

payment of premiums. 

Federal Flexible Spending Account Program (FSAFEDS) 

We do not see a need for special procedures for the FSAFEDS program at this time. However 

with the potential for a significantly increased number of claims in the event of a pandemic, we 
anticipate there may be a coinciding increase in the time it takes for claims to be processed and 

reimbursements to be received. FSAFEDS will make every effort to communicate with 

employees about any possible delays. Agencies should contact fsa@opm.gov if there are any 

issues with FSAFEDS allotments or claims causing a hardship on employees and their families. 

Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program (FEGLI) 

The FEGLI Program has had experience with disaster situations, and if and when necessary, will 

apply expedited procedures used successfully in the past. In the event of a pandemic, an alert 

will be sent to agencies, giving details of expedited procedures (such as payment of applicable 

life insurance benefits without a death certificate). 

We hope the need for these flexibilities never arises. But we believe it is important for agencies 

and employees to know they are available. Thank you, in advance, for your help and 

cooperation. 

Robert F. Danbeck 

Associate Director 

for Human Resources Products and Services
Exhibit
32.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 (the “Report”) of United States Gasoline Fund, LP (the
“Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof, I, Howard Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity
Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.





Date:
              November
      16, 2009
              By:
              /s/ Howard MahName:
                Title:
              Howard
      Mah
                Chief
      Financial Officer
                United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                General
      Partner of United States Gasoline Fund,
LP
[No. 44588-0-I.

Division One.

November 20, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Michael E. Pittman, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-1-00725-1, Richard J. Thorpe, J., entered April 12, 2000. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)




(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 of the
Company fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of
section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





Dated:
      November 9, 2009
                      By:
                      /s/
      Zishen WuZishen
      WuPresident
      and CEODated:
      November 9, 2009
                      By:
                      /s/
      Sam YuSam
      YuChief
      Financial Officer
EX-10.6



 Exhibit 10.6 

FIFTH AMENDMENT TO 

AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT 

 THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”), is entered into as of the 6th day of August 2014 (the “Effective Date”) by and between BRETT D. NICHOLAS (the “Executive”) and REDWOOD TRUST, INC., a Maryland Corporation (the
“Company”). 
  WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company have entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement
dated as of March 31, 2009 (as subsequently amended as of March 17, 2010, February 24, 2011, May 17, 2012, and December 14, 2012, the “Employment Agreement”); and 

 WHEREAS, the Executive and the Company desire to enter into this Agreement for purposes of amending the Employment Agreement as
set forth herein; 
  NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy which is hereby
acknowledged, the Executive and the Company hereby agree that the Employment Agreement is hereby amended as follows effective upon the Effective Date: 
  

	 	(1)	Section 3(b) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to replace the target annual bonus percentage of “160%” specified therein with “165%”. 


 Except as hereby specifically amended or modified, the terms of the Employment Agreement, as amended by this Agreement, shall remain in
full force and effect. This Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in two counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement shall be governed in
all respects by the laws of the State of California (without regard to conflict of law principles). 
  IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company has caused this Agreement to be executed by its duly authorized officer, and the Executive has executed this Agreement, as of the date first above written. 

 

			
	REDWOOD TRUST, INC.
		
	By:  	 	 /s/ MARTIN S. HUGHES

		 	Name:  Martin S. Hughes
		 	Title:  Chief Executive Officer
	
	BRETT D. NICHOLAS
		
		 	 /s/ BRETT D. NICHOLAS