7I—D-143 

0

+► ,~► 

Pine Hall Brick 

L,IBVI

~ 

~o 

Mr. William Neuffer 

Emission Standards Division ( MD-13 

7-16-98 

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 

Dear Mr. Neuffer: 

This letter is in response to your letter dated June 30, 1998 requesting copies of two stack 

test reports from Pine Hall Brick Co., Inc. in Madison, N. C., one covering an 

experimental limestone addition test to our brick body in an effort to determine the effects 

on Hydrogen Fluoride emissions , and one covering our new fast fire kiln. It is understood 

that this request is made as part of an information gathering process to support the 

development of a maximum achievable control technology standard for the clay products 

manufacturing industry. 

The two stack tests requested are part of two separate reports conducted by Trigon 

Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Project No. 046-95-104 was conducted in June of 1995 and covered two conditions at 

our Plant #4 site which is a conventional tunnel kiln operation fired with natural gas. The 

first test was run on June 8, 1995 when an experimental brick body containing a 2% 

limestone addition was in process. The second test was run on June 9, 1995 with the 

nonmal red brick body in process. It should be noted that Pine Hall Brick is in the face 

brick business . The brick made with the limestone addition were discolored and CQ[ILR 

NOZ be sold in the face brick market. The addition of limestone during the production of 

marketable face brick was therefore NOT FEASIBLEand no further tests were 

conducted. 

Project No. 046-97-191 was conducted in March of 1998 at our LOW PROFILE FAST 

FIRE PAYER PLANT which is also fired with natural gas. Two different brick paver 

bodies were tested in this project. The first test was run on a Pink Body mix which was 

run through the kiln at a 28 car per day push rate. The second was run on the standard 

Red Body mix which was fired at a push rate of 34 cars per day. TT SHOULD BE 

NOTED TgAT TffiS PLA_NT IS ONE OF THRF.E SUCH DESIGNED PI-ANTS IN 

THF WORLD AND IS NOT CONSMERIED A TYPIC i. OR FF.ASIBL.E DESICN 

FORAi.i. BRi_CK PL.ANT O E_R_A_TIONS. 

2701 Shorefair Drive, P.O. Box 11044 Winston-Salem, NC 27116-1044 Tel. (910) 721-7500 Fax. (910) 725-3940 

~ 
To help you understand my concerns completely, I want to point out that the product 

requirements for paving brick and facing brick are quite different. Paving brick 

specifications are given in ASTM C-902 and C-1272 where strength and durability are of 

primary concern. Facing brick meet other property requirements, as given in ASTM 

C-216 and per customer demands, which have not produced by "fast firing". Therefore , 

"fast firing " can not be considered as available for the production of facing brick at the 

present time.. Serious economic damage would result if requirements on firing rate were 

imposed on facing biick manufacturers like Pine HaU. 

The test repotts are enclosed as requested. Care should be taken in the use of and 

interpretation of these results since they represent special conditions that are not typical in 

the brick industry. They should not be used in the process of setting industry limits or 

requirements. 

We would be more than happy to discuss these results with you at your convenience. 

Sincerely, 

, 

Harold B. Newman 

Manager of Technical Services 

Ceramic Engineer 
Stationary Source Sampling Report 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - Plant No 

Madison, North Carolina 

Trigon Project No. 046-97-191 

March 1998 
Stationary Source Sampling Report 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - Plant No. 5 

Madison, Nort.h Carolina 

Trigon Project No. 046-97-191 

Mazch 1998 

Z-/ 
STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT 

FOR 

PINE HALL BRICK COIVIPANY 

MADISON, NORTH CAROLINA 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - Plant No: 5 

~ 

I 

~ 

t 

Performed by: 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Environmental, Health & Safety Division 

6200 Harris Technology Blvd. 

Charlotte, North Carolina 28269 

704/598-1049 

; 

Trigon Project No. 046-97-191 ; 

, March 1998 ~ 

t 5 i 
! 

~ 

a ~ 

REPORT CERTIFICATION 

This report, all testing details, and the final results have been performed under the supervision and 

reviewed by the persons named below. 

Date W Si 

~ i 

i ~ 

I 

Robert F. Callahan 

Project Manager 

Environmental, Health & Safety Division 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Date /YIaj Zs~ I ~'98' S 

. i 

.~ , 

Pau1 R. Jenkins, Jr. 

Quality Assurance Manager 

Environmental, Health & Safety Division 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Date 1~ Nv"' ~ ~~' f'~`~~ Si 

/ 

J.A. "Tony" Blanton 

Stack Testing Department Manager 

Environmental, Health & Safety Division 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

ii 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................1 

1.1 Purpose ......................................................................................................................:...1 

1.2 Outline of Test Program ...............................................................................................1 

1.3 Test Participants ..............................:.............................................................................2 

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................................3 

2.1 Discussion .................................. ................................................................................... . . ~ 

Figure 1- Process Air Flow Schematic ........................................................................4 

3.0 SAIVIPLING METHODS .......................................................................................................5 

3.1 Sampling Strategy .........................................................................................................5 

3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures ...........................................................................5 

3.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points 

andCyclonic Flow Deterniination ...............................................................5 

3.2.z Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination ...................6 

3.2.3 Dry Molecular Weight Determination .........................................................7 

3.2.4 Moisture Determination ................................................................................8 

3.2.5 Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling and Analysis ........9 

3.2.6 Sampling Ports and Points ..........................................................................10 

Location of Sampling Ports and Points 

Figure 2- Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant ............................................... l l 

3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control .....................................................................12 

4.0 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................................13 

4.1 Summary of Results ...................................................................................................13 

4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results ............................ ~ ~ 

Summary of Results 

Table 1- Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) .........................................14 

Table 2- Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) ..........................................15 

5.0 APPENDICES ..................................................................................................... 

A. Summary of Results and E.cample Calculations 

B. Field Data Sheets 

C. Laboratory Data 

D. Production Documentation 

E. Calibration Data 

.............16 

~ 

iii r7l' ~~ I 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 

This section describes the purpose, a brief outline including the sampling and analytical strategy, 

and the personnel involved in the test program. 

1.1 Purpose 

The purpose of this sampling project was to detennine concentrations, and emission rates of 

hydrogen fluoride, and hydrogen chloride from two product lines. The two products tested were 

both paver bricks. The first was a"pink paver" whose raw ingredients were white kaolin and red 

shale;the second was a"red paver" whose raw ingredient was predominately red shale. Both 

products were tested on the Brick Kiln Exhaust of the No. 5 Plant located at the Pine Hall Brick ~ 

:! 

Company in Madison, North Carolina. The results of the sampling and the documentation ; I 

provided in this report will be used for emission inventory putposes. 

1.2 Outline of Test Program ~ 

Stationary source sampling was performed March 3 and 6, 1998 by the Environmental, Health & 

Safety Division of Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. at the Pine Hall Brick Company's facility 

in Madison, North Carolina. Three 1-hour sampling runs were conducted on each product line at 

the exhaust of the Brick Kiln at the No. 5 Plant. United States Environmental Protection Agency 

(US EPA) Methods 1 through 4, and 26A were used for the determination of hydrogen fluoride, f 

and hydrogen chloride. All sampling and analytical procedures used were those established by the 

US EPA in standard reference test methods and appropriate state-of-the-art analytical procedures. 

T'he test runs were conducted during normal operating conditions. r 

~a 
13 Test Participants 

A list of the project participants, titles, affliation and telephone numbers can be found below. 

Participant Title Affiliation Contact 

Robert F. Callahan Project Manager Trigon Engineering Telephone: (704) 598-1049 

Consultants, Inc. Facsimile: (704) 598-1050 

John D. Archer Senior Environmental Trigon Engineering 

Scientist Consultants, Inc. 

Joseph P. Konzelmann Environmental Trigon Engineering 

Scientist Consultants, Inc. 

Preston McMillan Plant Manager Pine Hall Brick Telephone: (336) 427-2036 Company Facsimile: (336) 548-1837 

Harold Newman Facility Engineer Pine Hall Brick Telephone: (336) 548-6007 Company Facsimile: (336) 548-1837 

~ i 

I! 

2 I 

I 

f 

~~ ~`: 
~ 

; 

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

This section contains a brief description of a brick firing process, the type and amount of materials 

handled, and a typical process air flow schematic. 

2.1 Discussion 

The Pine Hall Brick Company, Madison, North Carolina manufactures specialty brick products. 

Some of the raw materials include; white kaolin and red shale. After the bricks are formed, they are 

loaded on to cars (rail cars) for transport into and through the kiln, where the final curing process 

takes place. Process emission gases from the kiln are exhausted through a 42-inch I.D. stack and 

discharged directly to atmosphere. Figure 1 details the process air flow schematic from this 

process. 

production data during sampling was compiled by Pine Hall Brick personnel and is presented in 

, %ppendiY D. All sampling was performed during material processing. During the first product line 

(pink pavers), Pine Hall Brick set the production rate (push rate) at 28 cars per day, 2,430 bricks per 

car, with a fired weight of 5.03 pounds per brick (fired-ware), this resulted in an hourly rate of 7.13 

tons. During the second product line (red pavers), the push rate was set at 34 cars per day, 2,430 

bricks per car, with a 5.40 pounds fired-ware per brick weight, this resulted in an production rate of 

9.29 tons/hr. There were no unusual process conditions noted during the sampling. 

3 

IF- AFAILOR/Z 
Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant 

Atmosphere 

T 

f—Sampling Location 

Stack 

T 

I.D. Fan 

T 

Brick Kiln 

I 

Figure 1 

Process Air Flow Schematic 

4 
3.0 SAMPLING METHODS 

This section describes the sampling strategy, sampling and analytical methods, and quality 

assurance/quality control procedures implemented during this project. 

3.1 Sampling Strategy 

The sampling and analytical procedures used during this test program were those established by the 

US EPA. Sampling runs were conducted in triplicate to validate the sampling. Tests were 

conducted during normal operating conditions. There were no unusual conditions noted during the 

sampling. 

3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

The US EPA methods used in this sampling program were Method 1 for the location of sampling 

,orts and points, and determination of cyclonic flow, Method 2 for volumetric flow rate 

determination, Method 3 for the determination of dry molecular weight of the stack gas, and 

Method 4 for the determination of moisture in the stack gas. Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen 

chloride concentrations and emission rates were determined using Method 26A. Sampling and 

analysis synopsis is discussed briefly in the following subsection. These test methods are available 

in the Code of Federal Regulations Volume 40, Part 60 or by request from Trigon. 

3.2.1 Sampling Ports, Traverse Points and Cyclonic Flow Determination 

The Brick Kiln E.rhaust sampling locations were prepared according to the criteria in Method 1. 

The duct diameters upstream and downstream ftom the sampling ports were deternnined prior to 

sampling. The number of traverse points were chosen with respect to sampling port location. The 

amount of cyclonic flow was determined according to the criteria detailed in Method 1. 

E 
3.2.2 Stack Gas Velocity and Volumetric Flow Rate Determination 

Method 2 is used for determining the average gas velocity in a stack from measurements of gas 

density and the average velocity head with a Type S(Stausscheibe or reverse type) pitot tube. This 

method is applicable for quantifying gas flows which meet the criteria of Method 1. Method 2 

cannot be used for direct measurement of gas streams which exhibit cyclonic flow conditions as 

determined by Method 1, Section 2.4. 

In principle measurements of velocity head and temperature are performed at the traverse points 

specified by Method 1. A properly scaled differential pressure gauge was selected for the range of 

Op values encountered during the traverse. A 0- 10 inches of water inclined manometer was used 

as the differential pressure gauge. 

D4.,ng this project, the sampling locations met all of the criteria detailed in Method 1. Gas stream 

density was determined by Method 3. Moisture detennination was performed by Method 4. The 

principal components of the gas velocity measurement system were sequentially: 

* A calibrated stainless steel Type S pitot tube and Type K thermocouple; 

* Leak-free interface tubing between pitot tube and differential pressure gauge; 

* A 0 to 10 inch inclined manometer and; 

* An NIST traceable pyrometer. 

The apparatus was set-up according to manufacturer and reference method recommendations. 

Pretest and posttest leak checks were conducted using procedures outlined in Method 2, Section 

3.1. Velocity head and temperature measurements were performed at the traverse points specified 

by Method 1. The atmospheric and static pressure of the stack was also detennined for each set of 

velocity head readings. The volumetric flow rate calculations used were those specified in Method 

2, Section 5. A more comprehensive e.cplanation of the reference method is detailed in the Quality 

A-qurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III (EPA/600/R-94/038c). 

R, 

~ 2: 
3.23 Dry Molecular Weight Determination: 

Method 3 is applicable for determining carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations and dry 

molecular weight of a sample from a gas stream of a fossil-fuel combustion process. This method 

may also be applicable to other processes where it has been determined that compounds other than 

carbon dioxide, oxygen, carbon monoxide, and nitrogen are not present in concentrations sufficient 

to affect the results. 

In principle, a gas sample is withdrawn from an emission source by single-point, grab sampling; 

single-point, integrated sampling; or multi-point, integrated sampling. The collected sample is then 

analyzed for percent carbon dioxide, percent oxygen, and if necessary, for percent carbon 

monoxide. For dry molecular weight determination, either an Orsat or Fyrite analyzer may be used 

for the analysis. 

During this project, the gaseous components were collected using a Method 3 sampling system 

following the analytical procedures outlined in the reference method. The principal components of 

the sampling system were sequentially: 

* A stainless steel probe; 

* A one-way squeeze bulb, to transport the sample to the Tedlar bag; 

* A saturator tube to remove particulate matter and excess moisture and; 

* A leak-free Tedlar bag equipped with a double-end shut-off quick connect. 

The analysis was perfonned with a Max 5 and a Fyrite type combustion gas analyzer within 8 hours 

of sample collection. The dry molecular weight was calculated using Equation 34, Section 7 of 

Method 3. The analyzer was maintained and operated according to the instructions recommended 

by the manufacturer and in accordance with Method 3 criteria. The analyzer and all connections 

were tight and leak-free. The oxygen analyzer was validated by analyzing a sample of ambient air 

3n. Ls confirmed at 21.0%. 

~ 

L 

L 

f 

C ' 

7 
3.2:4 Moisture Determination 

Method 4 involves the determination of stack gas moisture. Stack gas moisture must be measured 

when the flue gas flow rate or a pollutant gas concentration is determined. The moisture content is 

used to correct the emission concentration or mass emission rate to a dry basis. EPA Method 4, 

Section 3.3 of the EPA's Qualiry Assurance Handbook, Volume III, EPA-600/04-77-027b is used 

to measure stack gas moisture content. Section 13 of the Quality Assurance Handbook, Volume 

III, provides detailed information on the application of Method 4. 

Preliminary flue gas moisture determinations were conducted on the day preceding the test date. 

The preliminary flue gas moisture content (for purposes of setting the isokinetic flow rate) was 

determined using the wet bulb/dry bulb thermometers and partial pressure, vapor and saturated 

vapor pressure equations. This technique is described in Method 4 and is summarized below: 

* Moisten the wet bulb thermometer wick with deionized water; 

* Insert both thermometers into the flue gas stream and monitor the wet bulb temperature; 

* When the wet bulb temperature has stabilized, record both the wet bulb and dry bulb 

thennometer temperatures; 

* Calculate the flue gas moisture content (PMV) using the equations below. 

SVP = Vapor Pressure of Water at Saturation, inches of Mercury 

SVP = l Ox•"(6.6911 -(3144/(Wet Bulb + 390.86))) 

PMV = Percent Moisture by Volume 

PMV =(SVP -(0.000367(P b xDry Bulb - Wet Bulbx 1+((Wet Bulb - 32)/1671))))/(P b,) x 100 

Pw,, = Absolute Pressure of Stack Gas 

Pab, = (Barometric Pressure + (Static Pressure/ 13.6)) 

`IbP flue gas moisture content used in emission rate calculations was obtained in conjunction with 

tht sokinetic sampling systems. 

8 

IP`-ffA1Wi9 _ 

— 
The moisture content for emission rate calculations was determined in conjunction with the Method 

26A isokinetic sampling train. The reference method involves the withdrawal of gaseous and 

particulate pollutants from the emission source at an isokinetic rate using a Method 26A sampling 

system. The sampling and analytical procedure for reference Method 4 will be discussed in detail 

in Section 3.2.5 with the isokinetic sampling procedures. 

3.2.5 Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling and Analysis 

Testing for hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride was performed according to EPA Method 

26A. Gaseous and particulate pollutants were withdrawn isokinetically from the emission source 

and collected in a multi component sampling train. 'In principle, particulate matter includes any 

material that was condensed at or above the filtration temperature of approximately 250 degrees 

fahrenheit and was collected on a quartz filter. The gaseous components were then bubbled 

tt. jh a measured volume of 0.1 N sulfuric acid and 0.1 N sodium hydroxide to determine 

hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and moisture content of the emission source. The principal 

components of the sampling system were sequentially: 

* A borosilicate glass sample nozzle and probe liner; 

* A heated (248°F t25°F) probe and filter assembly with quartz filter; 

* An impinger train consisting of four sequential impingers. Impingers one and two 

containing 100 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sulfuric acid (0.1N 

H2SO4). Impinger three contained 100 ml of dilute sodium hydroxide (O.1N NaOH) 

followed by an impinger containing 200 grams of silica gel; and 

* A metering system capable of maintaining an isokinetic sampling rate and accurately 

detemuning the sample volume according to those specifications in APTD-0581. 

Sample clean up began immediately after each test run. Hydrogen fluoride and hydrogen chloride ~ 

was collected in the 0.1N sulfuric acid solution in impingers one and two. T'he liquid in these 

i 

impingers was measured to the nearest milliliter. The collected sample was placed in a glass 

sto- - container along with the deionized water rinse of impingers one and two and connecting ~ 

;lassware. The container was sealed and the liquid level was marked. The O.1N sodium hydroside ! ~ 9 ~ 1p- FAI ~i ~ 
solution in impinger three was used as a scrubber to protect the sampling console. The liquid in 

tkus impinger was measured to detennine the moisture content and later discarded. The hydrogen 

fluoride and hydrogen chloride sample container was sealed and the liquid level marked. The 

samples were then shipped to Enthalpy Analytical, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina with chain of 

custody documentation where they were analyzed by ion chromatography. The moisture collected 

by the silica gel in the fourth impinger was determined to the nearest 0.1 gram. All collected 

condensate measurements were recorded on the moisture determination and sample analysis data 

recovery form. The particulate matter sample was also discarded. 

3.2.6 . Sampling Ports and Points 

The dimensions of the sampling sites and the location of the sampling ports and points are detailed ~ 

in Figure 2. Method 1 sampling criteria was maintained in each instance. The ~ stack cross section 

was divided into the 24 equal areas as detailed in Method 1. The ports were labeled A and B. 

S. :ing was performed at 24 points for 2.5 minutes each, resulting in a total test time of 60 =, 

minutes. 

~ 4 

10 

E 
M. 

0 

SECTION K—K 

-2.0" 

)OF 

Brick Kiln Ezhaust - No. 5 Plant 

;Vot to Scale 

Figure 2 

Location of Sampling Ports and Points 

11 ~ 
3:3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc., has established quality assurance and quality control 

(QA/QC) guidelines for providing the highest quality sampling and analytical data from source 

tests. These QA/QC procedures were implemented to ensure the acceptability and reliability of the 

data generated. 

In summary, a high degree of data quality was maintained throughout this project. All 

instrumentation leak checks and QA criteria were met. Quality control procedures for Method 26A 

were followed. Field data and final data reduction results were entered into Trigon's Air Quality 

Data System by an environmental scientist, independently audited by the Project Manager, and 

reviewed by the Quality Assurance Manager for verification of data. A$er QC review by the QA 

Manager, the Department Manager verified the final report for completeness and reasonableness of 

da' The report was returned to the Project Manager for review and preparation of the final draft. 

The report requires the signature of the Project Manager, QA Manager, and the Department 

Lvlanager before release to the client. Data and final reports are archived in a secured area for a 

~ 

minimum period of three years. 

I'rigon's field and laboratory test equipment has been maintained and calibrated in accordance with 

juality assurance procedures established by the US EPA in the Quality Assurance Handbook for 

Nir Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III. Equipment calibrations including pre-test and 

)ost-test calibration data are presented in Appendix E. 

12 
4.0 RESIJLTS 

This section presents the hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen chloride (HC1) sampling results. 

Tabular results are also provided to present data from individual sampling runs collected during this 

project. Detailed sampling results and example calculations for the test program can be found in 

Appendix A. Field data sheets are presented in Appendix B. 

4.1 Summary of Results 

The tables below are a synopsis of the HF and HC1 sampling conducted on both product lines at the 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant. 

HF and HCl Sampling Results - Pink Paver Bricks 

HF HCl 

'centration, gr/dscf 0.037 0.009 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 3.68 0.856 

Emission Rate, lb/ton fired-ware 0.52 0.12 

HF and HCl Sampling Results - Red Paver Bricks 

HF HCl 

Concentration, gr/dscf 0.028 0.007 

Emission Rate, lb/hr 2.70 0.663 

Emission Rate, lb/ton fired-ware 0.29 0.07 

4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results 

Table 1 present the data from individual sampling runs on the pink paver brick product line on the 

exhaust of the Brick Kiln at No. 5 plant. The red paver brick individual sampling runs from the 

Brick Kiln Exhaust at No. 5 plant are presented in Table 2. Included in these tables are gas velociry 

ar. :)lumetric flow rates, exhaust gas temperatures, and pollutant concentrations, and emission 

rates 

; 

13 
TABLE 1 

Summary of Results, Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling - Pink Paver Bricks 

Brrick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant 

1,4 

un Number 

ate 

un Duration, Minutes 

ample Time, 24-hour clock 

~ verage Stack Temperature, °F 

;tack Gas Velocity, feet/second 

)tack Gas Flow Rate, 

dry standazd cubic feet/minute*(dscfin) 

'tack Gas Flow Rate, 

ac ' cubic feet/minute(acfrn) 

'roduction Rate, tons/hr (fired-ware) 

4ydrogen Chloride: 

Catch, mg 

Concentration, gr/dscf 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

Emission Rate, lbs/ton 

Hydrogen Fluoride: 

Catch, mg 

Concentration, gr/dscf 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

Emission Rate, lbs/ton 

* 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg 

1 2 3 Avg. 

03/03/98 03/03/98 03/03/98 

60 60 60 

0832-0936 0953-1057 1111-1215 

543.5 546.9 541:6 544.0 

41.9 45.3 43.6 43.6 

11302 12191 11785 11759 

24211 26158 25159 25176 

7.13 7.13 7.13 7.13 

21.513 23.119 22.401 22.344 

0.0086 0.0084 0.0085 0.0085 

0.829 0.880 0.859 0.856 

0.116 0.123 0.120 0.120 

93.940 106.74 87.814 96.165 

0.037 0.039 0.033 0.037 

3.62 4.06 3.37 3.68 

0.508 0.569 0.473 0.517 

z 

~ 

14 
a b 

~ 

3 

a 

~ 

= 

: "a 

~ _ a 

x 

~ 

TABLE 2 

Summary of Results, Hydrogen Fluoride and Hydrogen Chloride Sampling - Red Paver Bricks 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant 

Run Number 1 2 3 Avg. 

Date 03/06/98 03/06/98 03/06/98 

Run Duration, Minutes 60 60 60 

Sample Time, 24-hour clock 0815-0917 0948-1051 1102-1205 

Average Stack Temperature, °F 474.0 483.6 480.0 479.2 

Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.7 40.3 39.8 39.3 

Stack Gas Flow Rate, 10980 11652 11562 11398 

dry standard cubic feet/minute*(dscfrn) 

Stark Gas Flow Rate, 21756 23263 22999 22673 

~ i1 cubic feet/minute(acfm) 

Production Rate, tons/hr (fired-ware) 9.29 9.29 9.29 9.29 

Hydrogen Chloride: 

Catch, mg 15.109 16.797 18.455 16.787 

Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0063 0.0066 0.0073 0.0068 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.598 0.664 0.728 0.663 

Emission Rate, lbs/ton 0.064 0.071 0.078 0.071 

Hydrogen Fluoride: 

Catch, mg 61.502 64.459 79.450 68.470 

Concentration, gr/dscf 0.026 0.026 0.032 0.028 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 2.43 2.55 3.13 2.70 

Emission Rate, lbs/ton 0.262 0.274 0.337 0.291 

* 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg 

15 ' 

~ 
:.-- _>l-.= ~~ f.. F>' \ p':. _.lroar ~ , 

. . 

_ ~--•+~r.: N1Q-+•h .- ~ .v.-w• a..~~ r ic•c- '•i 

~+~ ~- ~•.• • ~ ~ ' i,t ~ •r. r~c .~'" ._.ti. t• • . F ,r ii •. . .' • . 

- w~~~ "- j ~ ~ - a` . — `" - - ~ _'_ . . ~-~~,. ,•`\ •, >1 :.` '.,. '' ' . a~ .w _ 't ' _ a ~ i. ~ .'~" ` tr..i3'~ 

 ..

,►

~i~~. ~::w~ S.. ~~ir.y ~.t

~a:~... ~:...~ ~ ... _ . y r. 

5.0 APPENDICES 

This section contains detailed supportive documentation that encompasses all aspects of the 

emission test program. Its contents serve as the foundation for the test report. The emission test 

report presents a summary of the information gathered during the sampling activities. The 

information contained in the appendices is necessary to facilitate the review of the emission test 

report and determine whether proper procedures were used to accomplish the test plan objectives. 

Defensible data and the subsequent pollutant concentrations and emission rates is one of the 

, primary objectives of any emission test program. To this end, a11 results, example calculations, 

field data sheets, sample recovery, laboratory results, chain of custody documentation, and 

~ equipment calibrations have been provided to support these objectives. 

1L ' 
APPEYDLX A 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS A~YD EXAMPLE CAi,CIJI,ATIONS 

A- 1 
SUMMA.RY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date: 03/03/98 03/03/98 03/03/98 

@ Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

Pbv Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.19 29.12 29.11 

Pe Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.018 -0.018 -0.018 

PS Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.172 29.102 29.092 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 38.67 43.10 41.66 

AH Avg. Delta H, in. H2 0 1.39 1.70 1.57 

T,m Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 56.3 66.4 69.6 

V5'M Volume Sampled at St,and. Cond., cu. ft. 3 8. 7 42.3 40.6 

Vc Volume of Water Collected, ml 81.3 84.7 81.2 

VWc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 3.83 3.99 3.82 

BWS Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.090 0.086 0.086 

PM,, Percent Moisture in Stack 9.0 8.6 8.6 

MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.910 0.914 0.914 

%OZ Percent Oxygen, Dry 16.2 15.9 16.0 

%CO2 Percent Carbon Dioxide, Dry 2.5 3.0 2.5 

%CO Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.0 0.0 0.0 

M, Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.047 29.115 2 9. 03 9 

MS Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/Ib mol 28.053 28.156 28.088 

Cp Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 

APS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.527 0.569 0.548 

TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 543.5 546.9 541.6 

VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 41.9 4 5. 3 43.6 

A Area Stack, ft= 9.62 9.62 9.62 

Avg 

29.14 

-0.018 

29.122 

41.14 

1.55 

64.1 

40.5 

82.4 

3.88 

0.087 

8.7 

0.913 

16.0 

2.7 

0.0 

29.067 

28.099 

0.84 

0.548 

544.0 

43.6 

9.62 

A-2 ., IP--'rAX 1411 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) 

Qso Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 11302 12191 11785 11759 

QA 

I 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 24211 26158 25159 25176 

' Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 12420 13341 12896 12886 

~ D. Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 0.311 0.311 0.311 

A. Area of Nozzle, ft = 0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 

I i Percent Isokinetic 104.2 105.4 104.7 104.8 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration and Emission Rate 

~ m, Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 21.513 23.119 22.401 22.344 

~ Cs Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0086 0.0084 0.0085 0.0085 

C. Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf 0.0086 0.0083 0.0083 0.0084 

1 CAw Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.829 0.880 0.859 0.856 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration and Emission Rate 

~ m, Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 93.940 106.74 87.814 96.165 

~ Cs Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.03 7 0.039 0.033 0.037 

C. Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.037 0.038 0.032 0.036 

CAW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 3.62 4.06 3.37 3.68 

A-3 ~~ ~ 
SUiv1MARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) 

Eaample Calculations Run 1 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

Ps = Pbaz+ Pg = 29.172 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

17.647 * Vm * (Pb„ + QH / 13.6) 

Vsm _ --- ------ -----------------------_---_ = 38.7 

TM + 460 

Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 

V,,c = 0.04709 * Vc = 3.83 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

V wc 

Bws_ --- -------- = 0.090 

V sm + uwc 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

100 * Vwc 

PM„ = _ ; 9.0 

Vs-ro + Vwc 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

100 - Pm,, 

MFD _ --_ = 0.910 

100 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

Md= 0.44 * %COz+ 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO2 - %Oz) = 29.047 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

MS= IVId * ( I - B,n) + 18.0 * B,,,, = 2 . ,) 

Avg. Stack Velociry, ft/sec 

(TS+ 460) 

VS= 85.49 * CP* OPS * SQRT ---- = 41.9 

(Ps * kQ 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 

1058.82* VS *A*PS *(1-B,,,,) 

Qsn = — -~---_--- = 11302 

TS + 460 

A-4 
SUMMA.RY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Pink pavers) 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

Q,=VS *A*60= 24211 

Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFVI 

Qsw = QsD* [1/(1-B,Xs )] _ 12420 

Area of Nozzle, ft= 

A. = ((D. / 2)"= * 114159)/144 = 0.00053 

Percent Isokinetic 

0.0945 * (TS + 460) * VsTD 

I = ----------- --------- _ 104.2 

A * Vs * Ps * (1 - Bw,) * A, 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

Cs =0.0154*ms /Vsro = 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

C.=0.0154*mn /V,,= 0.0086 

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

(At Standard Conditions) 

C,,,, = 0.00857 * C S * Qso = 0.829 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

I 

A-5 

2

~/ - . i 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) 

0 

I 

2 

03/06/98 

60 

29.57 

-0.018 

29.552 

38.22 

1.38 

54.4 

38.9 

85.4 

4.02 

0.094 

9.4 

0.906 

16.0 

2.5 

0.0 

29.044 

28.009 

0.84 

0.526 

483.6 

40.3 

9.62 

Run Number 1 

Date: 03/06/98 

0 Net Time of Test, minutes 60 

Pb. Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.58 

Pg Static Pressure, in. Hg -0.018 

PS Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.562 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 35.63 

OH Avg. Delta H, in. H20 1.22 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 49.1 

VSm Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 36.6 

Vc Volume of Water Collected, ml 83.0 

VWc Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 3.91 

Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.096 

P,,t,, Percent Moisture in Stack 9.6 

MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.904 

%02 Percent Oxygen, Dry 15.6 

%CO2 Percent Carbon Dioxide, Dry 2.9 

%CO Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.0 

Md Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 29.093 

MS Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mol 28.024 

Cp Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 

APS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.494 

TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 474.0 

VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 37.7 

A Area Stack, ft = 9.62 

A-6 

3 Avg 

03/06/98 --- 

60 --- 

29.55 29.57 

-0.018 -0.018 

29.532 29.548 

38.41 37.42 

1.36 1.32 

59.6 54.4 

38.7 38.1 

84.5 84.3 

3.98 3.97 

0.093 0.094 

9.3 9.4 

0.907 0.906 

15.8 15.8 

2.9 2.8 

0.0 0.0 

29.092 29.076 

28.058 28.030 

0.84 0.84 

0.521 0.514 

480.0 479.2 

39.8 39.3 

9.62 9.62 

-

~ 2 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hyd.rogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln Exhaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) 

Qsp Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 10980 

Q,, Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 21756 

Qsw Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 12151 

D. Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 

A. Area of Noale, fe 0.00053 

I 

, 

Percent Isokinetic 101.5 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration and Emission Rate 

M. Hydrogen Chloride Catch, mg 15.109 

C, Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.0063 

C. Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf 0.0065 

CAW Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.598 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration and Emission Rate 

m, Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 61.502 

C, Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.026 

C. Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.027 

CAW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 2.43 

11652 11562 11398 

23263 22999 22673 

12857 12751 12586 

0.311 0.311 0.311 

0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 

101.5 101.7 101.6 

16.797 18.455 16.787 

0.0066 0.0073 0.0068 

0.0068 0.0074 0.0069 

0.664 0.728 0.663 

64.459 79.450 68.470 

0.026 0.032 0.028 

0.026 0.032 0.028 

2.55 3.13 2.70 

A-7 

.~~ ; 
SLTMMARY OF RESUL,TS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln E,chaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) 

Example Calculations Run 1 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

Ps = Pbar + P s = 29.562 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

17.647 * V,,, * (P b. + [1H / 13.6) 

VS.M _ 36.6 

TM+ 460 

Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond.,SCF 

Vwc = 0.04709 * Vc = 3.91 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

V wc 

B„ s _ - = 0.096 

Vs-M+ Vwc 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

100 * Vwc 

Pmti, = ---- = 9.6 

VsTn + Vwc 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

100 - Pm v 

MFD _ ----------- = 0.904 

100 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

NId = 0.44 * %CO2 + 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO2 - %02) = 29.093 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

Ms =Md *(1-B,„)+18.0*B„.= 28.024 

Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

(Ts+ 460) 

Vs = 85.49 * C P * OPS * SQRT = 37.7 

(Ps *

NQ 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 

1058.82*Vs *A*Ps *(1-B,,,,) 

QsD = -- = 10980 

Ts+ 460 

A-8 OR 

~ 
SliNINiARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Brick Kiln E.ahaust - No. 5 Plant (Red pavers) 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

QA =Vs *A*60= 21756 

Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

Qsw = QsD* [ 1 /(1-Bws)] = 12151 

Area of Nozzle, ft = 

A. = ((Dn / 2)"2 * 3.14159)/144 = 0.00053 

Percent Isokinetic 

0.0945 * (Ts + 460) * Vsm 

I = --- ---- ---- -- = 101.5 

0*VS *Ps *(1-B,.)*A, 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/dscf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CS = 0.0154 * m, / Vsm = 0.006-31 

Hydrogen Chloride Concentration, gr/acf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

C„ = 0.0154 * m, / V~, = 0.0065 

Hydrogen Chloride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

(At Standazd Conditions) 

C,,W = 0.00857 * C, * Q sp = 0.598 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

A-9 

~~.~ 
APPEYDIX B 

FIELD DATA SHEETS 

B-1 ,C)' 
Stack Diarneter - 12 • 24 inches PelocXe to 0.50 iflcheS 

Stack Diameter > 24 inches Reloom to 1.00 inches 

m 

. - . 

7- 

~ 

EPA iVethod I 

Client ?,Vcr 

Determination of Sampling Porty and Points 

B A, c- x 6.,-, o., a ) / - Ciry/State A40450A/, AICSampling Location 8h4K C- .rq*,;Sr - A,&.3 AAA11-Date 3 - Z - 98 

r- A 

Dl=aft"CZ Y - 

63" 

SAMPLrNO 

,10CA170M 

K K 

D[SMRBAYCZ 

Schematic ofSwqmUV LacndP" 

Sampling Location Dimensions4 

.40 

From Far Wall to Outside of Port 6. 2. :5 

Nipple Length 3• Z.5"I 

Depth of Duct 112. 

Width (Rectangular Duct) 

Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE): 

2 x LengEh.x Width 2( 

DE = 

Leno - Width + 

Distance to Ports From Nearest Flow Disturbance: 

Upstream - A Downsweam - B 

Dimensions in Inches (03 0V 

Duct Diameters 

Stack Area. in Square Feet 

CalculationsBy 7;= cLocabon of Traverse Points in. CimmiarStacim 

.............. .... ....... 4 6 a 10 12 

1 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 

2 25.0 14.6 10.5 8.2 6.7 

3 75.0 29.6 19.4 14.6 11.8 

4 93.3 70.4 32.3 216 17.7 

85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0 

6 95.6 5 .690.6 65.8 35.6 

89.5 77.4 64.4 

.. . ....... 

75-0 

9 

..... . . ..... 

91.9 823 

io . .. ...... 97-4 882 

3.3 

97.9 

Location of Traverse Points in Rectangular Stacks 

2 3 4 5 6 7 

25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 

75.0 50.0 37.5 50.0 25.0 21.4 

62.5 41. 7 35.7 

3-,.; '0.0 ;8.3 50.0 

". 0 75.0 64.3 

..... . . ... 

77F 

.... 9 1.7 79.6 

92.9 

Audited 

OnA 

Z17 

31.3 

68.8 

813 

73.3 
EP.4 Method Z 

Determination of Stack Gas i%locity, [%lumetric Flow Rate and Cyclonic Flow 

Client )Rn/sr Att Co . 

Sampling Lucatip nec.A4 ic.d E 

Run Date .3l1 8 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29. 00 

Static Pressure. in. H-)O j~~ —©. 25 

Static Pressure. in. He — O. o/ D 

Stack Pressure. in. Hg L'O.'7Yl i 

Stack Dimensions. in.. diameteriside I 

City. State /7'4D/Je,o 

Operators AaC.. XA 

Time /'SOy 

Pitot Tube I.D. No.~ 

Date Calibrated1" 3 • 

Pitot Tube Coefficient 

Leak Check. in. H-)O <0. I 

Side?. in. 

Field Data 

- - — ----- 

Point 

Number 

- --- ---- -------- 

. 

— - - - - _ -------- -- - --- - - 

Determination 

 --- -- ~ 

©~~~~ ~~ 

{ ~ r ~ ® J~ ~ 

~ • ® ~ 

I I ~ • , ~®~ , ' , + ~ ~®®®~® 

{ 

; 

Stack Temperature. Dry. °F (i1) /345 Stack Temperature. Wet °F (B) 90 

Ditterence (A - B) 357, Preliminarv Percent Moisture s. 

Comments 

~~ bv~,~ l''t— Da145 

~ 
EPA Method 3 - Molecular TWeight DeterminatioR - Data Analysis 

Client Name PINE HA[t RR1eK C'o. Project Number 046-91 - (9 1 

aty/State f1ADISoN, NC Sample Date_01a319, 

Sampling Location 8alCk kILN OfHAUn' _ A/e. S PI.ANT Operator RFC/jPK 

Sample Type d Tedlar Bag d Multipoint o Single Point Fuel Type NATURAL GA S 

Analyaer Type Fvrite Serial # 300•003 c,(Oxygen Cahbration Check Must Be 20.9 t 0.1% 

AnGart TyPe Maa 5 Ser(GI # 131642 

Run # and/or Sample ID RVN I Sampling Time (24 - Hour Qock) 083 1 ' o934 

Gas: 

:.. 

"Re iicate I' Re lieate Z'' Re licate3' 

;:.:.. . Average 

Pereent 

Multfplier 

;.:. 

Moleeular Weight 

Dry ib/ib mo[~ 

. Actval Net: Actual' Net Actual Net ' 

coi: 2.5 2.5 L. S 2. S 1.5 2.5 2.7 I. to0 

16.2 I4.2 IG.I 16.1 I4.2 14.2 16 .11 

N=:' ''10~ ' g L 3 :: ioo: S I. y ioo :: 81.3 81. 33 o:2s:: : 22.172 

Run # and/or Sample ID RuN 2 

Total 23.0 y4 

Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) 0953 - (OS7 

. Re licate 1 

: 

': : Re licate 2."' . Re Ifcare 3 .: 

. ~4verage . Multipiier 

.. 

1~!Iolecvlar We4ht 

Acttial .:, Afec . Actusi °'1'4et Actual Net Percent ":Dry li~lIh molr ` 

co~; 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 o:aa ; 1.320 

IS.E 1 S.9 15.9 I S.9 IS.9 15.87 

Nz: '> 100 o:2s : 22. ~ 16 

Total 29. 1 1 y 

Run # and/or Sample ID Rw 3. Sampling Time (24 - Hour Qock) I I I I• 1215 

Re lieate 2` 

. .. - Re Itcate 3' 

. 

; Average Maitipiler ~ . Gas ; Re licate I 

' ketusi` :` Ne~ . ActUai Net Actual NeE Pereent , : ; Dr~ Ib1 

: cai>: 2.5 2. S 2.9 2.5 2. S 2. 5' 2. S .<»::::;:<<;:~<:;::':::;: 1.10 

>:>: I6. 0 (b.o 1L.o 16.0 I5.9 15.9 1S.91 

':: Moieculaj

bt 

22 . 

T~l 

udited v! ~C~L Dat~ 3 r ,Zo i 98 R_ 4 z~ F7Ar 
EPA itifethod 26A - Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis 

Client Name 'PI-/E ACc 8eicK Ca. Project Number 0T6 - f7-/9/ 

City/State 1-1*01JmA/, .✓C. Sample Date 3 - 3 -9g 

Sampling Location 3,ucK Z,u✓ ~x~9~rr -n.b •S R4wrSamples Recovered By QFC 

Clean-Up Box Number S Recovery Date 3-3 -58 

Chain of Custody: Date Received3 - 3 - ~P7 Received By PRZ Locked7 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number 

Sam le ID Number 191 -o / 7/5/-0-t- 19/-03 

Sam le Boz Number 11- / 

Probe Number ~3y~' or- oeCe 

Alnalysis of Moisture Recovery 

Rea ent Recoverv Container # 7/9/ -a/ J 7/1 , -OZ 7/ 9/ -d 3 

Im in¢er Absorbing Solution o• t / MZ So o•/I1 W—S° D./.J o 

Descri tion of Rea ent 04,044 C CL4MRRea¢ent Level Marked7 ✓ e-11- 

Final Volume, ml 2G 3 2-7 2- 

Initial Volume ml Zoo 7.00 Zoo 

Net Condensed Volume, ml (e 3•9 ^1 l• 0 72 •o 

Rcaizent Recoverv Contaitier # 7/1/ -o t '7i9/ -• z i91 _oj 

Im in er Absorbing Solution o. /n/ ^4zq O./,✓ ' 60</ d, t,✓ Aliv 

Descri tion of Rea ent 42.4 am'z ~' IMR CL&*A 

Rea ent Level Marked'? ✓ 161~ 

Final Volume ml 0 /474 too 

Initial Volume ml /oa i•o i o 0 

Net Condensed Volume, ml /O. 

Silica Gel Recoverv Container # / L -3 

Percent Silica Gel S ent 30 30 a 

Final Wei ht. g 1_a8. 3 2-09.7 20,2- 

Initial Wei ht. g 210-2 Zoo Zoo 

Net Absorbed Water. ¢ 8— 3 9 . L 

Total ReaQent Collected. Q 9/. 8 ~ 8/• Z 

Sample Reeovery 

Recoverv Container # 7/9/ -o / / S/-o L 7/S/ -03 

Rinsin¢ Solution rrA- J. '-m-_ ~~~• ~ 

Sam le Container Sealed? 

Li uid Levei Marked'.' 

Reagent Blanks 

Absorbing Blank Identification # '

7/9/ -O y Rinsine Blank Identirication # 

Absorbine Rea ent Blank "" Rinsing Rea ent Blank ~ 

Absorbina Blank Identification # ~' Rinsin¢ Blank Identitication # ~ 

~

tist Inu 

!

aLr 

.. . 

Aita 

Re ~•ietiver lnitiaLs I 

~ ~ ~ 7~r 
~ 

~ 

~ 

, 

I 

i 

i 

" '7 

8 

15, v Zl -33- 

/7.S z3.0 

9 20 . o Z .45 

/ o 2.Z, 6' Zfi . Zq 

25'. 0 -a iu 

/Z Z7, 2.9 . -33 

, 3o •a 3a - si 

2 34• S 32. 2 co 

3 3S o s . 

~ 37~ 

~ 1•~ 3 0 

s 7 S Wzcp 

9 

/o 

,So .o y3. 

y'+-75 

4~..31 

12 59 S y7 `i 

•o y9.12 

~ 3a. (.`1 

a.z it 1.4o /. 

0.2$ I.Yd l 40 

O. Z!, 1. 3D /- ,go 

o. Z,(, t . 36 

o. Z4 l. zo r. iC 

oZ3 I./& l.Iv 

0.t3 I.fo 1,10 

o.zZ 1.0Z /.ID 

6•2Z /.o$ /./o 

n 7_14 i if% I.Iv 

0.2 I•Jo 

rs- 7.3 

d• 3H i. - 7 l, s 

o.115 1.71 

u-31 I.Sc 

0.144 1 -zc 

2 

AZ"g 

I `I•S 1 554 Z 

I 14.0 559 2' 

1 4.0 ss 

~ 

2. 

z 

~ 

554 2- 

3.5 Sq S 2 

3. 5' 5 43 "LSLq 

N\5 S43 257 

3.5 sNS zS5 

3.5 Sy 6z 

15" Sy(o ZSZ 

S•o 545 Z47~ 

47 

w7 

qi 

So 

W 

le 2 

(cZ 

L 45 

_~f 

qe 

lsokinetic Ffeld Daia Sheet - EPA ,tlethod ~~ 

Client ' "~E ~'~ v'eKX 6. Run Number ~ 

Citv/State oA-1A0.,3&-J • AIL Date ~ 98 

Sampling Location d'Z/OX' A/W ofXW40S No. $ ?(-ifr/T Operators 

1 Bar. Press.. ln. Hg 2' t't NOMOGRAPH SET-UP LE4K CHECI(S 

Static Press.. In. H;0fO• 2,7 4H rF~r /- 0& y= Avg. S P o•3Z Pre-Test [n. Hg. 

Meter Box No. 30 • O15' Meter Temp. ~ Ref. A P 0• 38 Post-Test 0. 00 t ~~_ In. Hg. 

Sample Box No. /1, Stack Temp. 57 Desired Noale .3Z Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 a S2, ? IIn. H2O 

Probe/Pitot No. ZOO •C34 Pitot Coeff. p , $ -1 Noale vo..300 . 00g Post-Test Pitot <0.1 :g In. H;0 

Probe Temp. Setting Z 50 % Moistuts 7 Noale Calibration 0.310 C. 31 / O 4/t 

Sample ID No. Tg1 'd 1 C Factor D.~~03 Noule Diameter0- 3 i/ Observer 

Filter No. A# Statt Time ~832 End Time 3l!o Agencyr~ 

Sample 

Point 

Ciock 

Time 

Drv Gas 

lb(eter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

0 P 

In. H2O 

Orifice 

Setting JH 

[nchw H2O 

Ideal Actual 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Temperature °F 

inlet Outlet 

Purnp 

Vacuum 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. 

Temp 

°F 

D 10.45 0.35 1.11 1."70 919 y7 •S 2S3 9~ l 

Z 2.5, I.1s- 0 34 i. o I. v 53Z Z 3 Pi 

3 S, o 13. q o 0.41 Z•oo z. vo Sb 46 (0.0 530 Z 38 

~ 7. S 15 . 0.4Z 2.2b Z - 10 53 `t . 0 .1 Z 2 40 

S /o.o 1. 0.39 l-qa l- °IV 53 9 (0.0 327 2qs `iZ 

Z.S Ig. Z v.3 1-Ia5 1.l05' 'f 54o L 4~ 

Audited by: ki- Date: 31 r / 

/SQ /v0. / 

~A 1 s 2 
lsokfnetic Fleld Data Slteet - EPA .1letfiod 

Client .Yt,,g 1L~ ?)r'ICY- Ca RunNumber Z•- 

Citv/State N c - Date 0 3 - a 3'2 8 

Samplins Locntion 1 L - OperatorsiFe- pe 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg Z4. I 2 NON10GRriPHS£T-UP LF.r1KCH£CKS 

Static Press.. In. H,0 '0Z 5 &H.rr, !-$!p_ Y= L00 Avg. S P a• 28 Pre-Test D. o a'-f 'Fv (0_ [n. Hg. 

Meter Box No:)~~4 300 • 035 Meter Temp. 15 Ref. S P D•,3fO Post-TestD. ot)2 In. Hg. 

Sample Bo:c No. I Stack Temp. S45' Desited Nozzley• 337- Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 ru ~.~ In. H,0 

ProbelPitot No. 200- 039 Pitot Coeff. 0 1'4 Noale No.300. 0046 Post-Test Pitot <0. I% 7 0•

' 

 30 In. H,0 

Probe Temp. Setting2 B M_ %Moisture S Noale Calibration() 3ro O. 311 D• sf 1 

Sample ID No.1 1 a11 rt)Z. C Factor 1. OOU Noale Diameter D 11 Observer 

Filter No. 49 Start Time 001 53 End Time 1 0 57 Agency 

Sample 

Point 

Ctock 

Time 

Drv Gas 

Meter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

0. P 

In. H2O 

Orifice 

Setting AH 

Inches H,0 

Ideal Actual 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Temperature °F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

Vacuum 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. 

Temp 

°F 

q t 0_0 Yl - 39 o.zS t• q f•30 by 60 7-•5 54e1 24 5( 

Z . 57 50.1-6 o.Z? I. i) I.yo 59 3•() 5(0 2.So I w 

,v o.Zi l.Y I. v 54 ZSl 

1. % V5 6.?_-7 I .yD 1.40 (,c, 51 3~ 0 S45- L51 

o.D 55.$ o•Za 1.45 (. (01 5 Cl 3•o S43 24Z, qc, 

ip I 57. o.z% (J5 (.q b% Lo .O `il 2.57 y7 

I_O °59 •2.y 0•31 Z.oa 2.00 10 La 0 Z.Sq 4 

o 

L 

I?. 4f • l4 Q-5% 11 .1 5 I.q g 11 ( 3• 5' 59 z52 SO 

Zb . o (e 3•Zo . 3 1•75 . -IS 1 Z. I (o 1 3.0 34 ti 4_5.~2 1 24-1~ 

o o.Zq I•So 1•5.0 ?Z 1 (ol 3.0 O 50 

t t o ~t, ,l~ o.23 z.~ I.ZO ? (OZ t S zSco S ► 

IZ (, Z1 v.23 I.Zo (.z0 73 C,t 2.57 53 a zS 5 ► 

6 q, a O.L1 , 2.10 Z.10 `7 (c I 3. 5't a z5 4~ 

L Z,' .1v9 0.4 .3t~ L. c~ o (ol y•O 3 25 

3Sc7 .?'~' 0. ~'% 

o•L(% 

t•'fs 

2-45 

2. 

2•4s' 

1 

15 b3 .5 

SS(. 

z 

Z.yz 

z(,` 

50 

57- 

tp 

O. -0 

L}2.5 

.OZ 

FA.I I 

0•" 

o• 9 

2•7-0 

4 ,00 

3.20 

Z.00 

1Co 

1-7 

(o 

GLi 

lo 

q O 

SGZ 

56 

ZLZ 

7-C.`4 

S 

55 

-I 4C0 2•o4 0. 3 )•7 S 1.75 l(o tcy 3.5- 5SI Z51 

go.o 8s.c,? 

0.30 

o. 

I.S 

(•c0o 

i. 

l.c.o 

14 

14 

IS 

l~ 

3.0 

3 v 5~ 

Z(.o 

Z 

53 

5z 

10 SZ S 4$?_4 0.31 1. UV 7 (• 

(•`I 

3- 

1. o S u 

153 

253 

SL 

53 

iZ 51, 5 `fo. ~'7 l.3S 1. 3S ~•4 .v ~3 253 3 

ao S, 4A _ 

(43.10 

by: ~ ~Date: 'v 

QA 

i/• 7~ ~ ~ G~. V~ 40 V" , 

1~ 1~ 9 

B-7 

~,~ 
Isokinetic Field Data SJreet - EPA Jlethod A _ 

Client ~ Y~ r'fZ ~ Df-t ~_ Gt'. Run Number ~ 

City/State rn o.~• t'~ L i Date n3- o 3- 9b 

SamplingLocation Bf-1jd-- 'f01+1 ~k~~a Operators 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg 1V0h10G1U1Pff SET-UP LE9K CIYECKS 

Static Press., In. H2O-o- Z5 OH fgI ~ %t a Y=l.DO Avg. p P D. 53 Pre-Test0.0 0 3 'c~ 1 D In. Hg. 

Meter Box No.1o0 .035 Meter Temp. 1 0 Ref. J P 0 • 3 L Post-Test o• vo L u (4 In. H;. 

Sample Box No. ll Stack Temp. 5 y S Desired Nozzle 0• 311 Pre-Test Pitot <0. I ~ ~. t ~ 3. i4n. H,0 

ProbeJPitot No.200 . o'34 Pitot Coeff n. Qq Nozzle No.300• 00 Q, Post-Test Pitot <0.1 In. H,0 

Probe Temp. SettingZS % Moisture S Noale CalibrationV• 31 O (23 11 0. 31 1 

Sample ID No.] I 9 I -0 3 C Factor 0. °) 5 1 Nozzle Diameter0•31 1 Observer 

Filter No. AJA- Start Time 11 I I End Time 12 I S Agency^ 

Sample 

Point 

Clock 

Time 

Drv Gas 

Meter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

A P 

In. HZO 

Orifice 

Setting AH 

inches H20 

Ideal Actual 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Temperature °F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

Vacuum 

inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. 

Temp 

°F 

C+ -t•41 0.3g (.95 1•9S `1 b3 4-v 535 239 49 

Z z, qq. 1 6.(41 2.10 2.10 68 ~3 S. o 53 2 5 I `~ b 

~ a~.4~ v.y(, L 3S 2•3S (,9 (, 5.5 3`b 251 y 

7• `1 ~ .57 o.u3 t-20 2.20 12 (n3 5.0 63 2 ~fS 

5 I w. ~ t 0-41 2.Ib 2.ro 1 5.0 4' Z49 47 

102-1o'b 0,3 1-45 l•aS 1 IOS S.o 55 Z ~tS 4q 

ay•5 ~b 0.31 1•c•o ,bo ~~ (o y•5 558 2,50 50 

l o t,.3 o.z9 (•50 1.50 1 b S 4.0 5S5 49 

ci Zo.o (d$.c,q O.zs l.y '(.y5 17 •Gce ~{.0 553 ZS'~I 56 

IO ZZ.~ log. 6.2 ~ I. o C'. ~fo ~ L Lilc3 5 Z5 7 51 

~ I 2.. I1 l, ~3 o.z (•ZS /.zS -7 ` 3•s 5.3% Zs S) 

tz 17.4 ~ IJ•oa o.zz (.ts l.ls '~ g (~7 •0 '53 5 2-S8 50 

$ 1 t~ O.z3 VZo l. ZD 'l l,V 3•0 531 56 49 

Z. 32. r/r'oIlg 0.-n 2o t.20 15 bto 3.0 S36 t55 4 

3 aZ`1 Z /ZS 'i5 co(o 3.0 536 255 `fV 

4 1 l°t. 1 16 0.25 1•30 1.3p l4 t• S 3-5 53$ z5z yy 

5 •D Ilo.14 O.zS 1•30 /.30 13 65 36 535 Z55 y ~ 

Z` /ZZ- 3 /• 30 l. 30 -77- 64 3•5 35 ZS(o 45 

.0 1 17-3. 0-3to 1 1.817 ).B S 1 5 4-5 53to 25(, yL 

41.5' 1 ( z-5.?7 d. t.8o 1. ebo 14 (n5 y•5 3'~ ZS G c' 

V -o 127L3 0.-30 (•55 l. SS 14 Io5 t+.v S3 q Z5_? 

Y0 / Zq. y o•z P. `~S 1.145 T (, to y-0 51 15*4 4 

5.0 C3(.1 1 0•7-S 1-00 l.30 b 3•5 536 Z.SS `{ 

l2 " 13t, 6.24 (.ZS /.ZS* S Wo 53fo 25(0 50 

13~4 . 33 

_j I. S -7 

s' ed by: N~" Date: l I/~ 

4QA~ s 

156 140. 44 

~l~ 
EPA Method 3- Molecular Weight DeterminatioR - Data Analysis 

Client Name F14E HA+•— BR" C1?. Project Number 044-q7 - l 91 

City/State MA0150r•l + IfG SampleDate 03~ q 0 ~ 1 ~ 

Sampling Location 2ic4 (Gud Ez ~~wsr Operator 7DA 

Sample Type VL Tedlar Bag ❑ Multipoint ❑ Single Point Fuel Type 4,%TV0Zwt. 6AS 

Analyzer Type Fvrite Serial # 3tr0_w3 dOaygen Calibration Check Must Be 20.9 ± 0.1% 

A.oA, *w,- Trw A!gX 3 5mmL d 131442. 

Run # and/or Sample ID ~ I 1tl 1 - 05 Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) OgI S " 04 0 

Fas :: Re licate I.. `Re licate 2' Re licate 3` Avera~e: 

PetrenE: 

Multlpiier. : Molecuiar R eigbE 

Actual Net: Actusl ` Nei ActnaT < Net Drg iGFlb mole: 

3 •0 3. D 3.0 3.0 Z.8 2.1 2•43 0.44 

i. S,S ~ s.s Is, s I s. g ► S, U D "' d3z 

~!. 99 Z 

N=: lo. fI S 100 . ~1. S 100 

Tot'i 

Run # and/or Sample ID Z 1 (9 I — 010 Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) 

t~: Re Itcate 1' Re licate 2. Re licate3' Average 

: Pereent 

Multiplier 

Actval ; De~r ib/lb moi _ Net' Actual Net ' Aclusi Net:: co~ 2~ 2. S Z(o 2.1. Z. s 2-S 2•S3 °~ I, 13 °_ ~`•~ ~~.c is.9 lS.9 c,.0 r~ .o ~4 °3z 

` Molecuiar WeigI 

s110 

N= loo y1.S ioo: 81•S ioo' SLS ~i•SO a~:2s 22.SZ0 

Total Zq• 043 

Run # and/or Sample ID 0 / Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) 11 V Z — I ZyS 

Gas Re licate 1 Re licate 2 Re licate 3 

1 Average 

Percent 

Multiplier Molecular Weigbt 

Dry IbJlb moie Actual Net` Actual Net Actua) Net 

Ca: Z.$ Z.g 3.0 3: 0 2. 4' 2.1 2.77 0.44 1, Z.fo3 

IS. 9 Is. q/s ?3 osa S. oLl. 

N= 100 loo I $t.i Ioo ?1.3c) ZZ. 

Total Zq. OQ3 

~ 

 br ~ Date: 3 ~r9 rQ~~

Kiited

 B-9 , - 
EPA Method 26A - Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis 

Client Name F^ E 4A44 attw-K CG. Project Number 64 - Q7 - 19 1 

Ciry/StateIq,4w5o..1 L 4C Sample Date 0 31000 

Sampliiig Location$RtUC {~(, ~J EtrliWSr- ~o• S f~1+JrSamples Recovered By 7 Q 

Clean-Up Box Number S Recovery Date 03 04 Q 

Chain of Custody: Date Received ~~l ~~8 Received By ~ Locked7 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number 1 7- 3 

Sam le ID Number 19( -d5 7191 -o(o '7141-o r/ 

Sam le Box Number lZ 12, IZ 

Probe Number Zov • 034 7oO-oV Zay .0 y 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Rea2ent Recoverv Container # 19 1-05 191 -o(- 'f /9l -07 

Im ineer Absorbing Solution 0. 14 d-250 .1 AJ OaSO o.l Al i4aSo4 

Descri tion of Rea ent C~~ ta✓ Ca✓ 

Rea¢ent Level Marked? ~ `~ ✓ 

Final Volume, ml 2 ~ S 110 Z4S 

Initial Volume. ml ZeG Zad 2-oa 

Net Condensed Volume, ml #7 S O S 

Rea ent Recoverv Container # 7i41 - a T 7191 - o(i 0719 - O'1 

Im in er Absorbing Solution 1PJ AkO 4 0. 14 AI40 0.1 J NaCg 

Descri tion of Rea ent Cow etW/ ckw 

Rea ent Level Marked'? ✓ ✓ ✓ 

Final Volume, ml o-O iol tio 

Initial Volume, ml I o o eo ieo 

Net Condensed Volume. ml O 

Silica Gel Recoverv Container # / Z 3 

Percent Silica Gel S eiit 1 0 7_0 ~ 

Fina! Wei ht. g 201• 0 08. 05 

Initial Weisrht. oo,t) 2.00.0 2oO.D 

Net Absorbed Water. g 

Total Rea ent Collected. LF 

Sample Recovery 

Recoverv Container # 7191-0$' os 'jr41-o!~ 7111-0'1 

RinsinQ Solution De uJarViL bt (J.FM D,.)wrM 

Sam le Container Sealed7 

Li uid Level Marked? ✓ `~ 

Reagent Blanks 

v -1_ 

Rinsi F3 IQI-o& 

D:..c, 

Absorbin¢ Blank Identification # 

11 Reviewer liritialr 

O%.A ► L _ 

^ RinsinQ Blank Identitication # 

iA 

::<;: ..: ,.::... 

~r 

:.. ,.: :. .....:.: 
tiC ea~ 

Isokinetic Field Data Slreet - EPA ;Kerhod 

Client T/A1E J1Y'W& 40014K CC11 - Run Number ~ 

City/State /1-40i3Oi ~ AJC Date 3 ~ 04 ' /8 

Samplinz Location B''2K.k, K"d EXW4KJST -/Yd• S Operntors ~\W< J~Q 

Bar. Press.. ln. HgZ a.S$ 

Static Press.. In. H :0'y • Z. S 

"+leter Box No. 30o, 03S 

Sample Box Vo.1Z 

ProbelPitot No.7_10o.03 k4 

PmbeTemp. SettingZ5'~ 

Sample ID No. 711 

Fiiter No. ^/-4 

oHg1 .bVY=l.oy 

Meter Temp.3 a 

Stack Temp.1A15 

Pitot Coeff.D, QW 

% iVloisture 

C Factor f7 M O S 

Start Timen 9i1 S' 

Avg. p P 0. -Z S, Pre-TestO ou 1 'g 1 t) In. Hg. 

Ref. % P b. 3"1 Post-Test D0 .0( u In. Hg. 

Desired NoaleD, 3-H Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 Lv G.~ T. y .in. H,0 

Noule No.306.04Z Post-Test Pitot <0.1 w 4 3. S' In. H,0 

Nozzle Calibration 0• 310 0.311 0.311 

Nozzle DiameterD.311 Observer 

End Time O e11 '1 Agency 

NOMOGRAPff SET-UP L64X CHECXS 

Sample 

Point 

Clock 

T'une 

Drv Gas 

Meter 

Cubic Feer 

Pitot 

Reading 

a P 

In. FItO 

Orifice 

Setting :1H 

Inches HZO 

Ideal Acttta} 

Drv Gag 

Meter 

Temperature'F 

Ialet Outlet 

Pump 

Vacuum 

IncHes 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. ! 

Temp ~ 

'F 

0.0 t , (.0 0.30 1,0& l.So y'2. 4 I H. 4k,3 24 B 4 1 

2 2.S 134. 2t7 013 I.IoS 1-toS 'i4 41 Li.S 46 1 250 9 1 

3 1•tou 1.b0 45 41 4.5 y1r) 253 4v 

Y '7. 5 139 . 1 0 S. 0 IS14 '+Z I 

S /c• o I.24 .14 ,& I. 4a 4 5•0 y gt 15 

G 12.5 142.ti 0-10 11.40 /.50 50 43 5•0 44 

IS o I 2 O.ZS 11.Z, I.Zo 51 43 SO 4 2 

17•6- 1Li+0. 11 0.2Z. r. o% 1.10 5Z. 1 43 4.0 485 24 

g 20 . 0 1 y'1 .153 0. Z . 0 S 1, S2. 43 3• 5 ' ZS t 44 v 

~0 2z . S ms.q 1 b.zl !. oS 5 3 40 3 ,5 2S') y 

t/ ZS.a 150.3z e.i 6A3 0.$3 C31A (45 3•0 4 65 t5 4-7 

/2 27. 5' i1 - L.1 o.1 0. %3 was S4 y e, 5.0 y te 4 

A3 i 3a . 0 15z .$4 0, o. $ 8 0. 3.0 tA 60 vis 4io 

z 3t.S 154.15 0-IS 16.$ o. WS 54 t, 3•0 41all ZSZ- 4to 

.3 35•0 15S.43 0.19 10.93 0.93 S4 4b 3•0 41, tSo y5 

37.5 1154•78 0.19 1 0.13 0-23 515 41.1 3.0 4170 145 45 

s ya.o t . v.l°1 1 693 o.crs Sb 41 3.0 4 ZS% 4 

(a 42.6 15 , y5 6•21 I.oS 1.05 'S(* Li 3•S 4(O-) 2-55 `fb 

'qs • o 140. S 6-31 1. 5 C) 51 4 5.0 443 Z 1 48 

8 V?.S 161•50 6.10 1.44, 150 5S 4113 •0 4 253 1 4 

9 So.o I64.1 o.n 1.3.5 1•3 51 y ' y f, 3 Z4 o 

io y9 y•v 4 y t5q 50 

tD7.Z Z 1 .15 1• I S 51 4 4.0 y y 2.5 51 

iL 57.5 IU&1S 6 -7-4 1115 t. 45 y ~ 473 2- v 5 

~p. 0 1-1 u. z3 

~- 

3 .c~ U< 

. 

.audired by: PC Date: 

Aeog% 
lsokinetic Field Dura Sheet - EP.a .Kethod 

Client r/./E ~ '8Q/C-A-, C-0 • 

Citv/State AJCRun Numb~Z 

Date .3 ' ~' 18 

Sampling Location ~''2 ~x ~~ ~'~~•~ - N~• J~ l~i.✓r Operators3?k 1IDT~ 

ar. Press.. In. Hs ZI • S 1 NOMOGRAPHSET-UP LF.r1K CffECKS 

Static Press.. In. H2O - y ' ~ 5 AFi ~~~ Y= ~•~ Avg. S P O ZS Pre-Testa• n uy ~ Jt) In. Hg. 

Meter Box No.)W • O55 iVleter Temp. Ref. a P i7. 3'7 Post-Testd ~ Z ~u ~_ [n. HeSampie Box Vo. Stack Temp. 4l < Desired vozzle0.343 Pre-Test Pitot <0.I y 1.Z tlo In. H:0 

ProbuPitoc vo.7 W•D34 Pitot Coeff. O. c,6 4" Noale No. Jm - 09 t Post-Tesc Pitot <0.1 § 1413. S fn. H,0 

Probe Temp. SettingZ. S t) °/, iVioisture 16 No2zle Calibration 0.31 O 0.111 (>.31 1 

Sample ID No. ?1 9 r - aO C Factor0.914 Noale Diameter Observer 

Filter No. /I/.+ Stan TimeO c1 y Cd End Time1 y5 Agency 

I Sample 

Point 

Clock 

Time 

Dry Gas 

imeter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

a.P 

In. H2O 

Orifice • Setting .SH 

[nches H,0 

Ideai Acal tu 

Dry Ga5 

Meter 

Temperature'F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

Yacuum 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. I 

Temp 

'F I 

A• / o.o I'1 .u'7 0•31 I. ~S I• ~d~ 5 '1 3• ~ y`bZ 25Z ~13 

Z 2.5 172--`61 D.N0 1-8D I' 

3 s.o 7.tolj .40 ZSy Z 

1/ 7. 5 1 ,7t,-5 3 o, qb .as I.-K Sy q ..S yaS zS3 4 Z 

S /ro. o I -7 . 6. -5e ~.~'f l.~s So 3.5 490 2s% 43 

G 12.5 1 000 -ZZ c.m Ins 1 ., (.Z 51 3. 5 4aS Zn 4 

l ~~ 1 2 . oo 0.28 t.3s II-4-o S% SO 260 

-q 17•5 .V0 1.1% 1•30 17 So lo 49,0 7- Sl 4 

26.0 IC65.Z4 O-ZS 1,Z1 I.Z S) ZLo N 

o 22.5* 1$ 7 b.z3 I. z. 1,10 55 51 Z• 41 S' Ztoo 4S 

i/ Z6.0 1$8 .z4 O zZ. I.o s l.to s5 5 r Z• L4J. Z.t+o 4 S 

i2 27.5 1 ZR. o 0 .2•z NOS !. Jo 5 1 Z• (p4o 7J.PQ 

'!3 i 3a.0 ISI .1S 02) l.oz J.00 Slf Sr .o zso 

Z 32.5 '97•SS o•zz 1.0 5G 51 7--4 4 Z5 

.3 35.0 193.9 o.Z l.lZ I.t o 9 51 2. 5 4`b Zeo 

37. 5 11 . 6 z'L 1,09 120 51 51 z. 493 ~ S 

s ~/o.0 9~ • .z3 oz. l./d Sq S2 2•S y9 LSz 

~ s l a .z o• z 3 1.z. . l o Y9 25 4(. 

~s • 0 199•7,q .3z 1 5a 11. 400 G o sl 3.p IM 7-53 46 

8 47.5- zol.5 0. -95 I.-) < r.7 '6 1 4°1Ce Zcoo 'f$ 

9 So.o Zo~ •z( 0•30 1.49 ).So 61 S .0 45o -7-55 4 b 

/o Z.`5 04. % 0.21, 1•7.% I-So to"L 53 3.0 4acp 1 254 '-K 

~i 55.0 2o t-! o.zZ l.oS l lv 61 Z.S 4

,) el ZS f 45 0 

/L 57.5 ZJl• 3 D. Z1 1. oZ /. O0 (c`Z. 

lo~•~ 20 `f , ZS S 

~ .. .

. 

Audited by: Date: 

,s6 1t-1 

- 

QA B - 12 

~~ 
lsokineric Field DatQ Slreet - EP.a .Ylelhod Z (c~ 

Client F1.11E 'a- &iCie Run Number. 3 

CitviState / /40i307k/ , A/ C Dace•3 b ' J8 

Sampling Locntion 8etcje //,O• SAOAIr OperatorsYPk NO 14 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg 7-9_ • NOMOGRAPff SET-UP LF.r1K CNECKS 

Static Press.. In. H.0 AH'u~ ~Qj~ Y bV Avs. A P0•7-$ Pre-Test 0.0O7. 40_ [n. Hg. 

Meter Boc Vo.!P°' V3 ~' Meter Temp. L C7 Ref. ~ P y• 37 Post-Testo• ~OZ ~~_ [n. Hg. 

Sample Box vo. Stack Temp. Desired Noale0• 333 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 r7,Ir [n. H,0 

ProbeuPitot Vo.2CO-o 3y Pitot Coeff. 0• $ u Noale No. U4? Post-Test Pitot <0.1 'm') '03 [n. H:0 

ProbeTemp.Settina I 50 %,Moisture NoaieCalibrationb,:UO 0.31) O.'i/1 

Sample iD No.1719! ' a? C Factor (a, Noale Diameter4• 3il Observer 

Filter No. AJa' Sttut Time IA WL End Time IZ o S Agency 

Sample 

Point 

Clock 

Time 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

& P 

In. H2O 

Orifice 

Setting .SH 

Inches H2O 

Ideal Actual 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Temperazurt'F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

uacuum 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

[mp. 

Temp 

°F 

A/ o. o Zoq.44 o,Zo 0.99 0, Scl 5to 5Z 3.0 L4 25 4(o 

Z 2•S 2.10.'1 o-ZZ. l.OS 1.10 Sl 5 

3 S.o z. lz. C-s 0 .2:N ),IZ 1.io S5 SZ -3.5 Li1Z Zio1 ~3 1 

'l 7.6 I 3.c, 9 v.z 1 1. oz. 1.00 ~i SZ .Z ( } Z.S4 43 ~ S /c. o Z1 5.o ~ o-ZZ 1.0$ 1: 1 0 l.L S S.~ 4 zsaS 4 ~ 

G 12 • 5 Z l, .5 o.2.a .1 ~ 1.ZO LZ S3 y.o yq t55 4~ 

!~' o z i.oz c.33 I.c,5 I. b3 54 S•t) zt..v '~ 

17 •~ Z r 5.18 0:3 ~1 1. lfl q 1.7 c~ 

i/ 

(. 5~l S•S 't5 `~`t 

) Zc .o Lzl.s3 0• I 1. S I. ~4 .C~ 4 Z53 ~{`1 

/d 22.s ZZ'3.Zc.. a.L`E . I') .Z.C~ 64 4 C~ `~$v Z53 5~ 

26.0 iz4 . Z. o ZZ J. oa .1p u. ~}.O 4l1 2 4 S( 

/2 27.5 LZCo .30 0•Z I . oZ , 00 LA, '5 5 3.5 y Z.SZ 3 ~ 

!3 / 30.0 Zz7. 0•35 I.'1S 1 1.7 -5 63 5V 5.0 y11. 7_5 S I 

Z 32.5 Zz9.49 0.34 . ~a .70 t~ e 5 .0 47"1 S 1 

.3 35•0 .Z 0. 3% • 8 . 0 b 7 5 7 .v ! 47~ Z(Po SI 

3-7. 5 .12 p. 3b l. 9? I• 90 (,1 8 G. 0 47 $ 

S o 2. o. -7 5 6.0 47Z 

~O Yk .S Z.8 0.33 t. 665 lo I'le 58 47Z Zt, ! S ~ yS• o z38.toz o.Z?j 1 .1 0 A90 bL4 57 Sv 4 3 59 s 

8 1/7. SS Zyo. 3Z 0-2 /.Z! 1• ZO (#3 58 4. n 489 Z1.Z 55 

So.o Z'fl. tY I o.2`/ l. . Zo W 59 1 14 ,0 4 8 71,Z 55 

I 

9 

io 2'5 zy?. 37 02Y 1.1'1 1.20 (, S too W.0 gso 251 S 

55, o 0.7-'3 i. l. l o lo 5' [.o Lt. v 471 Z S9 54 

I ~ L 57.5 24(a. ~+ 0 .2 .tZ. I.rCO (c ~ loD y.o 47 Z51 5S 

' (00• o Z 85 

4 

_ 

3~. a• Z1 ...: :/. 3~ 

Audited by: /fft Date: 3 / / ~ ~ 

QQA B - 13 ~~ ~ 
APPE~IDLX B 

FIELD DATA SHEETS 

I 

- ~ 

~:.1~ TfalOO1V I 

~w 
Stock Diameter - 12 • 24 inches Reloc2te to 0.50 inches 

Stock Diameter > 24 inches Relocate to 1.00 inches 

F 7A 

ZZC 

EPA Method 1 

Determination of Sampling Ports and Points 

Client IPIAIC- 1714U- BAICAe 6-1^4ftl */ - Cirv/Smte /A4POCA/-, AIC 

Sampling Location BA" kl",V C-,rll"WJr - Ak. -1-114dr Date 3 - 2- - 9 8 

A 

63 

SAdfPLINC 

K K 

B 

DISTURBALYCZ 

Schemadc of Sampling Locadon 

Sampling Location Dimensions: 

From Far Wafl to Outside of Port 45 1' 

Nipple Length 

Depth of Duct 

Width (Rectangular Duct) 

Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE): 

2 x Length x Width 2( 

DE = 

Length - Width + 

Distance to Ports From Nearest Flow Disturbance: 

Upstrearri - A Downso-cam - B 

Dimensions in Inches 

ov 

Duct Diamcters 1.00 

Stack Ara. in Sqiiiare Feet •67- 

CalculationsBy 7t=L - 

Location of Travorse Points in. Circular Stacim 

. 

....... .. 4 6 a 10 12 

1 6.7 4.4 3.2 2.6 2.1 

3 

2 25.0 

75.0 29.6 

14.6 10.5 

19.4 14.6 

8.2 

11.3 

6.7 1 

4 93.3 70.4 32.3 1 2.6 17.7 

5 85.4 67.7 34.2 25.0 

6 

............... ms 95.6 90.6 65.8 35.6 

-7 89.5 77.4 64.4 

8 96.8 85.4 75.0 

9 ....... ..... ...... 

.. 

............... .......... .. 

... . ..... ... 91.8 82.3 

10 97.4 98.2 

93.3 

12 97.9 

Locstion of Travene Poina in Rectangular ShmM 

2 3 4 5 6 

1 25.0 16.7 12.5 10.0 8.3 7.1 6.3 

2 75.0 50.0 37.5 30.0 :5.0 21.4 18.8 

3 83.3 62.5 ;0.0 41. 1 35.7 31.3 

4 37.i -0.0 ;9.3 50.0 43.8 

90.0 75.0 1 64.3 56. 3 

91.7 78.6 69.3 

7 92.9 91.3 

8 .. ..... .. . ........ .. ....... 93.3 

9 ... ...... . ... .... .. 

10 V 

It si 12 f 

Audited bv D I 

A*-T% 
EPA alethod Z 

Determination of Stack Gas Velocity, Volumetric Flow Rate and Cyclonic Flow 

Client AtL &2i-.K (:~D . 

Sampling Lucati pn ic.Az icN E 

Run DateT2 >g 

Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 27,00 

Static Pressure. in. H-)0~s3r1~ —O. 2 5 

Static Pressure, in. He _ o. o! Q 

Stack Pressure. in. Hg LV.`7'b i 

Stack Dimensions. in.. diameteriside I 

City. State /Ti+D/i e,d . 

Operators AiL ~ TPC 

Time / 6,Ot) 

Pitot Tube I.D. No. 2dW.0 

Date Calibrated /— 3 - 9I 

Pitot Tube CoetFcient 0. 

Leak Check. in. H-)O <0.1 i_~ _ 

Side ?, in. 

Field Data 

Point 

Number 

. 

Determination 

~ I 

~ • . " .; . _ ~ . I 

~ ' - ' ' ~ ' ~' • . ® • ie I 

~ • ~ ~C1:1:a~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~ 

~ 

®MAi~ii- 

~■■~~~~~~■■~~~ ~ 

~ 

~~~~~~~_~

; ■■~ ~ 

~~~r~~~~ 

i 

~ ~

~~~~~~ ~ 

► 

, ~ ~~~~~ ~~s ~ ; 

~~ , • ~~~~~ - ~ 

Stack Temperature. Drn•.'F (ik) 130 Stack Temperature. Wet°F(B) 90 

Ditttrence (A - B) 77 ~-- Preliminary Percent Moisture S. 

Comments 

rOANrbv. •~l'~ DaaQf id~ ~ B - ~ 1L f mm m"00~ 
EPA Method 3- Moleeular Weight DeterminatioR - Data Analysis 

Client Name PIIvE HAIt RRIO Co . Project Number d46'9'j' (9tj 

City4tate f1ADISoN, NC Sample Date 

Sampling Location BRICK KILN EXHAUS'T - Ne. 5 PLANT Operator RFC/JPK 

Sample Type d Tedlar Bag d Multipoint o Single Point Fuei Type NATVRAL GA S 

Analyzer Type Fvrite Serial # 300.003 e(Osygen Calibration C3eck Must Be 20.9 ± 0.1% 

Anebrt Tyre r14k 5 Serf,-1 #1316AZ 

Run # and/or Sample ID RVN I Sampling Time (24 = Hour Qock)d$ 31 ' 01 34 

,. 

6as 

. 

=` Re licate ~ I Re ificate 2` Re licate 1 ,.:.. > Avera;a 

Percent 

': MuItipiier 

. .. 

Molecular Weigbt 

Actnai ` Net Actaal Net Dry IWIb moi~ 

. kctnsl Net '. 

CO:::' 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.9 2.S ~:4a I.loo 

5 .114 

Ni. 100 21.3 >. I08_: 81.4 <IOa ; 8l.3 81.33 0.2s 22.112 

Total 29,046 

Run # and/or Sample ID RuN 2 Sampiing Time (24 - Hour Clock) 09S3- 10 51 

,.: ; Re licate 1 ,: ::. Re Iicafe l: '>: ; .; 

Re licate3 ~kveca~e ;.Muitiplier Molecniar Wei~t 

. . .. Actt.al 

, _ Net . .. ., ActuaF Net' . Actvat Net Percen~ Dryli~ mole 

coZ 3-0 3. 0 3. 0 3. e 3. 0 3.0 3.0 ::..:;. <;oa::: ::::: .... .. 1.320 

15.9 IS.9 IS.' 15.87 8 

Nr_ ° l0Q ;: H 1. 2: Ioo . E1.! Io~ SI . I 81.13 .:: .: a~ .2s ;:::. 22. 7 16 

Total 29 • ~ ( `I 

Run # and/or Sample ID Rvv? Sampling Time (24 - Hour Qock) I 111- 1215 

; Gas Re licats l Re licate 2' Re iicate 

,. 

3 Average Multi lier P - 

: .:;; 

. :' Moiecular We" t. 

Actval NeC ,4ctna t NeE Actusi _' Net Percent:_ ::::. "D r7 li~/lb moie 

Cos::: 2.5 2.S 2.5 2.S 2.S 2.S 2.S »>~° ::::: 1.100 

I 16.0 

i :: ri= .::: ~ov:::.: 81.5 ioQ - YLS ::»:aoo:.:: 81.6 51.53 : a.2~ ` 2Z.t2Y 

Totai 29.039 

i 

A 

.;~.a Zo/ 98 ~ 

, 
EPA iVfethod 26A - Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis 

Client Name ~FJE ~gcc aeice Co. Project Number 07/O - S7-/9/ 

Ciry/State A/L Sample Date 3 - 3-9g 

Sampliiig Location e,u✓ CxWq,,rF- -n.b 5 ip,4✓rSamples Recovered By QFC 

Clean-Up Box Number S Recovery Date3-3 -78 

Chain of Custody: Date Received3-3 - g~ Received By ~~ Locked? 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number / 2 ,3 

Sam le ID Number 191-0 / 71 51 - o;- 7151-03 

Sam le Boz Number 12- / 

Probe Numbec wc- eve 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Rea ent Recoverv Container # ?/9/ -o/ /9/ -Oz 7/9/ -d3 

Im in er Absorbing Solution o. i Ff dz Sc o•/F✓ <4 So 

Descri tion of Rea¢ent 

Rea ent Level Marked7 ✓ ✓ ✓ 

Final Volume, ml 2G 3 L7 2- 

Initial Volume ml Zoo 7-00 Zoo 

Net Condensed Volume. ml (e 3 • 4 7/• v 72.0 

Rea ent Recoverv Container # 7/S/ 9191 -°3 

Im in er Absorbine Solution o. /n/ LOA~ O v. / 1 Akv 

Descri tion of Rea ent 

Rea ent Level Marked'? ✓ ~ 

Final Volume. ml c7 /O 00 

Initial Volume, ml /oo i.o /oo 

Net Condensed Volume. ml 0 

Silica Gel Recoverv Container # / L 3 

Percent Silica Gel S ent 30 30 0 

Final Wei ht. g 2-06. 3 209• 2,42- 

[nitial Wei ht. 2.oJ 2- 00 Zoo 

Net Absorbed Water. ¢ 8 3 9• 2, 

T'otal Rea¢ent Collected, Q 9/. 8,~ 7 1 g/. Z. 

Sample Recovery 

Recoverv Container # 7/9/ -o / / 9/-o z 7/S/ -c3 

Rinsin¢ Solution D/ JdTTA- o'j''''~ ~F~•~ 

Sam le Container Sealed7 

Li uid Level Marked? l~ 

Reagent Blanks 
Isokinetic Field Data Sheet - EPA .Kethod 2(074 

Client FWE 4cL <:o . Run Number ~ 

Citv/State /'7ADrJeuA1 • itiL Date -98 

Sampling Location eyt/ geXi14o'ST ' No• S/d4j6✓T Operators /~G TP ~ 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg ~' ` I~ NOMOGRAPFI SET-UP LE4K CFlEC1CS 

Static Press.. In. H,0 ~D• Z~ pH Fu Y= Avg. A P o•3Z Pre-Test 0. ov 1 eZ %s~- In. Hg. 

Meter Box No. 10- 01-5 Meter Temp. ~S Ref. A P o•38 Post-Test 0.00 i'cb In. Hg. 

Sample Box No. 1 ~~ Stack Temp. ZN77 Desired Nozzle .12 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 g( 672, ? In. HZO 

Probe/Pitot No.Z°O'o34 Pitot Coeff. O. 8 "► Noaie No. .30e .~g Post-Test Pitot <0.1 1n. H:0 

Probe Temp. SettingZ5o % Moisture 67 Nozzle Calibration O• 3t d 0.311 

Sample 1D No. 7111 'OI C Factor 0.110 Noale Diameter 0• i1 Observer 

Filter vo. uo Start Time 0832 End Time 3~o Agency 

Sampte 

Point 

Clock 

Time 

Drv Gas 

A~(eter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

~ P 

[n. H=O 

Ori6ce 

Setting ~H 

Inches H:O 

[deal Actual 

Dcy Gas 

lvteter 

Temperature'F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

Vacuura 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

FiIter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. 

Temp 

°F 

A i D 10.4 0.35 1. -1 t 1.'70 119 ~ 7 • S 5351 

Z 2.S r,IS' 0 34 11.70 1.70 53z Z5Z 3 

3 5.o i3. o 0.4 2.00 z-vo Sa 46 (o.o 2. 39 

~1 7.s ig 0.4Z 2,.A 2. i0 ~i 6.0 S Z a 40 

~ l0. o I. 0.3q 1-9 a l- °IO 53 L{ (o.0 527 2y 

!~ 2.,r Iti . z v.3 l-(OS 1

. 415• 4 S.o 540 t.41 4T 

q y5 3 252- 45 

8 1/7-5- ?_5-os 0.2$ l.Yo l• qo S SI 1 `t-S 55cr 7-59 1 W 

9 Zo.o 7-.(,5 o.z` 1.3D l• ,so 55 I 14.0 55g V4 IN y 

/o 2Z, O' Zl, .2'1 0• Zl. 1.30 4► 4 ,0 Ss Z. `tt 

26• 0 V. iN 0•2. 14 1.2o (•Zo 61 q.6 1 55,4 Zl.o 4$ 

iZ 27. L9 • 33 o.Z3 1 1.1c, !. r o b Z S3 3.5 S4 S 25 

~ 30•a 30.81 o• Z3 1 1.10 Itla 5 Pl S4 3 545 253 

z 34•5, 3z.2co o.zz l.oa I.rO (nZ 5q 3.5' 543 ZSq 

3 36.0 s. o•2 z 1.0 $ l. lc> 63 5y 3A5 S43 257 45 

~ 37 23 l. ro 1J4 S 3.5 ~45* 

4f25 

'~ 5 

S • 0 3 e .5 0.2 1-lo I.IO ~y S 3• 5 59 I 'Ii 

~ Z•.S 3 b 3 1110 1.10 L5 ss 3.5* PI(. ZSZ q(o 

7 iT.0 -3i.r,4 0.3H J• 1.7o L,s 5.0 5y Z.y 4b 

8 10.5 41.2to o. 1.7 1 1.7U bl, •0 4l4 t5 47 

~ 

/o 

Sa .o S

,SZ•~ 

(-43, 

W'•}.?S" 

0.31 

0.2 

l.s S/- 

•2 

55 

O 

6q 

~al~ 

<to

S~ 

5-0 

~~ 

y3 ZS 

 OI 

q7 

i 55.0 1 4to31 o.Iq o.93 0•93 0 57 3•0 5 z o 

12 575 y7 `f 019 O.q O 4-1 57 1.0 1 5q1 Z5~ C) 

.o 141 IZ 

I3avl 10• E t~12001~ 

: ! ~u~ ~ ~' ::>:;:; >. > 

Audited by: Date: ✓ / 1/ 

/SQ /va r 

~ : . / i 
n 

lsokinetic Fleld Data Slleet - EPA .Ylethod _2(on_ 

Client ~~~~ ~ 1'1 C.).l ?)r' 1c)(- C,r,~Run Number Z 

City/Sta[e N (-- Date O 3 -~ 3 -ef S 

Sampling Loca[ion ~ L - Opera[ors ~-~ P~ 

Bar. Press., In. Hg 24 • I Z 1V0N10GR4PH SET-UP LF,~lK CHECKS 

Static Press.. In. H20 '0• Z S DI I.~ I - $ln_Y=1,00 Avg. A P 0• 28 Pre-TestD• 0a`{ ~u O~ In. Hg. 

Meter Box No)"1--4-; 300• D37 Meter Temp. 1 S Ref. J P D. ,31D Post-TestD. 002 (Cv ';_In. Hg. 

Sample Box No. ~ Stack Tem p. S ~ S Desired Noaley• 33Z Pre-Test Pitot <0.I „ 

r^u 6 .19 (In. H,0 

Probe/Pitot No. 30D- 03`') Pitot Coeff. O•$`l Noaie No.300, 00% Post-Test Pitot <0.1 a •Zj3•0 In. H,0 

Probe Temp. Setdng ~7S Ca_ °/, Moisture S Nozzle Calibration n. 316 0.311 D•st 1 

Sample ID No.-1 1 pl l rbZ C Factor 1.000 Nozzle Diameter O- 311 Observer 

Filter No. A Start Time oQ 53 End Time 1 0 17 Agencv^'-- 

Satnple 

Point 

Ciock 

Time 

Drv Gas 

Meter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

0. P 

In. H2O 

Orif[ce 

Setting AH 

Inches H20 

Ideal Actual 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Temperature'F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

Vacutun 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

FiIter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. 

Temp 

°F 

q 1 m_C) Y41- 39 o.z.S I. q t•30 by (oD 1•5 54e1 24 51 

Iz z. 50• °I-6 0.Z7 1.40 f. '(0 (, 5 5`i 3.0 5 25o 1 `I 

10 o.zI r.t /. 44 51 3.6 54 7-51 

Lf 7. % 15 D•7--7 I.41> 1•40 c,c. 59 3~ 0 54S ZSI 

Om Ss .$ o• 7-oo 1.45 1. V7 5 q 3• o S43 24 z, q tr 

I 57.5(y o.'t% (.45 04 bt G0 3.0 S41 Z.57 y 

(.0 -Y9•Zo 0.39 2,cc3 2.00 10 0 2.5`1 4 

a 1?, (G( • l4 0..5qS 1•4 S I.Q 5 11 3. S 5YT Z52- SU 

(e 3-Zo 0:33 1•75 JOS 'I Z (o I 1 3.0 3 1, t, /-s3 1 70 

I 0 (04 ,10 o-Zq 1. So 1,75 '7z 61 3. o y o 2.5(- 50 

z,o c.c,,(, 0•23 .z.o I.ZO -) 6z t-S 5391 zSco 51 

z ZT< c, .ZI 0-z3 I.Zo r.zo 33 i,z 2-5- 53S Z'55 51 

6q. D 0.41 1 2.10 Z.10 (1 7 (01 3-5 51 0 25 47 

L 'Z .' JJJP9 D. 45 L. 30 L. o 10 1 `/ . 0 '3 Z S 

35c7 0•4a t.45 2-41T 1Z (trZ `'F.S Ssc, 247- a 

o.y~ 2.y5 2. ~ 1 63 • ~ z z ~ (- Sz 

40.0 . o Z 0• tf3 Z. Zo 'Z , 2 o "1 [, lo , v S6 Z Zb Z 5 

(J. l-~-.s eb• I1 0• 3q t.00 Z•oo 17 64 q o 56 ZLq 55 

-7 4&0 Z.oq o. 3 i- ~ 5 r. s ,c~ tay 3.s Z5 ~t 5 

~ Z3-5 0.3o 1.5 i. 14 3.v c. ZLo 5j 

gao 8s.c,-7 o. (•too l.(,o 14 63 3 c) 54 Z 5Z 

to 5Z 5 g7-4 0.5, 11. tel I. ta -? ` 3.0 Sla Z53 Sz 

S5.0 'beA- zo o.-z co l. 31; -74 44 1.0 L. 253 53 

IZ.. 51.3 qo.B? d•'ZC. I.35 I.3S y (p4 .c) ~3 

o. 

y3. I o ~-3`-- /• 7U 

lep l4CA9 

by: ~ Date: 

~ 

Q~ B - 7 ~ ~ TF~~ca~aV 
lsokfnetic FlelJ Data Slieet - EPA Method z (+A 

Client7& ? ., r'Q.141 Uf t(A< Run Number 5 

City/State fV\PA t'4 L Date- n 3-D 3-9ib 

Sampling Loca[ion _P I Operators x~C JPIl~ 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg Q . 11 NOMOGRriPff SET-UP LE4K CbfECKS 

Static Press.. [n. H,0 -0- ZS c1H rr'y 1.%t,p. Y=I Z0 Av¢. S P D• 33 Pre-Test 0•0 03' 3c 10 In. Hg. 

Meter Box No. '?no.03S Meter Temp. 10 Ref. c1 P o. 3G Post-Test o• oo L ~ (0 [n. 1{0. 

Sample Box No. 11 Stack Temp. 5 tl S_ Desired Nozzle 4 - 311 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 cl, 7• z~3•~(n. H,0 

ProbelPitot vo.200 .O'34 Pitot Coeff: n. gq Nozzle Vo.300• UO Q, Post-Test Pitot <0.1 a?~ In. H,0 

Probe Temp. Setting7_5 ('~i_ % Moisturz 5 Noale Calibration V• 310 (13 11 0. 31 1 

Sample 1D No. ')1 9 I' 0 3 C Factor 0.9 5 1 Noule Diameter ~ • 3i 1 Observer 

Filter No. Allt- Statt Time 1 I'I End Time 12 / S Agency^ 

Sample 

Point 

Clock 

Time 

Drv Gac 

Meter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

~ P 

In. 14,0 

Ori6ce 

Setting aH 

[nches Hi0 

Ideal Actual 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Temperature °F 

[nlet Outlet 

Pump 

Vacuum 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Bo~c 

°F 

Imp. 

Temp 

°F 

1•9S `? 63 4•c3 535 215 4% 

Z Z. Qq. ( 0.(41 2• 1 o 2.10 I,S b3 5.o 53 2 5" 4to 

916.1{'% v.yV L•35 2•35 (,9 l, 5.5 53S 251 y 

9%.57 0.(13 L•20 2.z0 12 (03 5.0 563 2 145 

5 to0. 0•4 1 2-Id 2.10 -14 64 1 5.0 SLI" 249 47 

lOZ•lo3 p ~ 3 1-45 l•`!S 1 `S 5.0 55 Z ~{$ 49 

" I e,. 0 ID4-5% 0.31 1. (bo I f. bo 1 ~1 (o I `I •5 558 ?So 1 50 

IoZ.3 7 0-19 l.So I-5 lb S 4,0 5S5 4q 

2o.n ( b$. c,q o.2ib i.y 'f. y 17 •4P V `f- o $53 ZSy 56 

t0 Z.-S I og. 0.2 I. o f. qo 11 4(o Li, a 5 ZS 7 51 

11 2- 11 1.43 O .Z (•Z5 /. ZS -7f2 l.? 3•5 53 zsl 51 

~ z " (IJ•oa 0.2z I.(S 1.157 '78 0 •a 53 5 2S8 50 

$ I 3on 1 11 t{. 4 p.Z3 I.Zo I. ZO 14 W, 3•0 1 537 56 q9 _ 

Z- 3L. l I lo A 0.z l, 2o l. 20 15 blo 3.0 5.36 4 

3 1 17-41 azy .z /.zS 15 cob 3.o 53g Z55 46 

1} 1111. 1$ O.ZS i.3o f.3o '14 V S 3.5 53$ 152 t44 - 

j ~ 40.0 I20.14 O.ZS 1.30 1.30 l (05 3,5 535 Z55 y 4 ' 

ko Z^ IZZ. 33 /. o ) 30 -77- (04 3.5 555 251. 45 

45 .0 I7-3. 0.3(o 1.97 ).%S l3 ~ 5 q•5 S3to 25(. N` 

41-5' l 2im d• 1• Su I. o 14 (o 5 y. 5 5 3'1 ZS G Li 6 

a.o IZ7.43 0.~ f-55 l. -7 14 IeS 4.0 S Z57 

~ co y-0 531 Z54 4 

$.O (3(.1) 0•Z5 1-'30 1.30 IS lo 3•S 536 Z.9S 4 

I 13Z, li 0. 29 I.ZS l -7 S Wo 53& Z 54 50 

t.7tt 33 , 

~tl• ~ 0.30 ,:: l. s ~ b9~8 ::::::;. ::: 54 . 4 

t~ ISe IJI.Y 

a - r~

s• by: Darc: / / / ~ 

~ B - 8 
EPA Method 3- Molecular Weight Determination - Data Analysis 

Client Name P. 1E 0^rd. $R" CD. Project Number 04L ~ 4 7 - I 4 1 

City/State N(R D t5oa1 + 1~C. Sample Date ~

1 O ~t rq g 

Sampling Location ~~24C I kac rl Ezsr ►I ~w Operator JDA 

Sample Type Tedlar Bag ❑ Multipoint ❑ Single Point Fuel Type )~JAtORwL 6,eS 

Analyaer Type Fvrite Serial # 3ov w3 dOxygen Calibration Check Must Be 20.9 ± 0.1% 

A.rwy;nnr- Trpt No S 5NR*L (A,2. 

Run # and/or Sample ID ~~~ r S Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock) OV S - 0q0 

6as:` 

; 

: Re licate I` Re licate 2' Re licate T Averap: 

Perceut: 

Multriplier. : Moiecutar WeigLt. 

Actual Net. Actual ` Net Actual Net Dry Mb mole 

~ : ` 3.0 3. 0 3. 0 3. 0 2.g 2.1 2•93 

~= 1. S, S 15.S l5, S I S. g I S. I S. (o D 032 ~{. 49 Zr 

N2: ; 100 gr, s .: 100 g(, s 100 8,A qI 0.25: 

T°W Z 9. 013 

Run # and/or Sample ID 2 ~ «I - 010 Sampling T'tme (24 - Hour Clock) 011( r' I O S I 

; . 

Re licate l` Re licate 2 Re lic.~te 3 

, 

~verage 

Percentt ` :. Muitiplier Molecniar Weight. 

Actual D . lii ~Y ✓Ib mote 1Vet :.r~ ctasi Net Actual ° Net 

;co,; 2•S 2. S Zle Z.L Z. s 2.S 2.SJ .:::::: 

l&.v i4.v IS.9 lS.9 (,.0 /G.0 !SQ Uz S(l0 

N: 100 lr.s lo0 81•S loo' SLS 81•SO o.as Z2.8Z~ 

Total Zq.043 

Run # and/or Sample ID ? ~k l~ ~ 7 Sampling Time (24 - Hour Clock)I 1 VZ - I ZyS 

Gas Re itcate I Re licate 2 Re licate 3 Average 

Percent 

Multiplier Molecular WeiQLt 

Drp. [b/Ib mo(e Actuai NeC Actusl Net Actual Net 

C% 2.$ 2.1 3.0 3: 0 2.7 2.1 2.47 0.44 r. Z(o3 

IS 9 Is. 1 Is.r 0.32 5.01.6 

N. loo i, ~{ Ioo 81, r 1oo ? 1. 30 0.28 22 .?G 

Total Zq.0q3 

I 

ited by: ~ Date: raA" B - 9 
~ 

Absorbine Rea ent Blank o•1 14SOCkOm-rc Rinsing Rea ent Blank ~ 

Absorbing Blank Identificatiori # 7111 -08 Rinsing Blank Identification # 

Absorbiniz Rea ent Blank Rinsing Rea ent Blank ~ 

Absorbin¢ Blank Identification # ~ Rinsin¢ Blank IdentiPtcation # — 

A nalv st (nitiu Ls JYDA 

Reviewer liritiaLs 

~ It14a : 1 / F71. iV: I 

EPA Nlethod 26A -Moisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis 

Client Name PI.-JE 4A44 aR><K ~• Project Number 

CityiState t4r4Dlso..l , ,JC Sample Date d 3 C' 0k q 9 

Sampliiig Location$RtU( g,,.4 Ex4&vsr - da. 5 RMlrSamples Recovered By J Q 

Cleari-Up Box Number S Recovery Date Oj a 4 a 

Chain of Custody: Date Received ~ il ~~ 8 Received By Locked'? 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number ( ~- 3 

Sam le ID Number 71lf -d5 'T 1 91 -o!o r114 =o ry 

Sam le Box Number I Z 17, 1Z 

Probe Number ZW • 0N 1 7 00. D34 1 Z~•03y 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

Rea¢ent Recoverv Container J7111 -05 119 1- OC- 719/ --07 

Im inser Absorbiniz Solutioll O.l Wi5a .1 Al FIaSO.{ 0.l ^I 14104 

Descri tion of Rea ent c4Ca✓ 

Rea¢ent Level Marked7 1-1 ✓ 

Final Volume, ml Z1 S Z1 o Z4S 

Initial Volume, ml Zao Zad 2ao 

Net Condensed Volume, ml go S 

Rea ent Recovetv Container # 71q1- aS 7191 - oV 1714 - 0'7 

Im in er Absorbing Solution ojjJ /W4 0.1 #J 4&04 0.1 AJ NaDI4 

Descri tion of Rea ent Gfol 

Rea ent Level Marked? ✓ ✓ ✓ 

Final Volume, ml I C-D iol u 

Initial Volume. ml f e o e0 ieo 

Net Condensed Volume. ml _ O 

Silica Gel Recoverv Container 

Percent Silica Gel S eut 2 0 LO 2~O 

Final Wei ht. it 2of•o I-OTA loq .S 

Initial Wei ht. g 60.0 2.00.0 200.0 

Net Absorbed Water. g S• ~ ~• •S 

Z'otal Rea¢ent Collected, u O ~s ~ • 5 

Sample Reeovery 

Recoverv Container '7 i 4 1'°L 7 tt l-°7 

Rinsin¢ Solution D~ u~w'+VR Dr w~ D~r~wtk-L 

Sam le Container Sealed? ✓ '~ 

Li uid Level Marked? 

Reagent Blanks 
IC 2c~ 

isokineric Field Dara Sliees - EP,9 .Ylethod ('0A 

~aJ~ 

Client r/.✓E Run Vumber / 

CitviState AJC Date 3 ' bV ' 78 

Sampling Location aaKX S A."" % Operators J~t JDA 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg 7 4 .S15 

Static Press.. In. H•O-e • Z. S 

Meter Box No. 100 - 03s 

Sample Box vo. 11- 

Probe/Pitot No. Zbo.03 ~ 

Probe Temp. Setting ~ 5a 

Sample ID No. ?/' /- os 

Filter No. AM 

&H ~ I .eb4 Y 

iVteter Temp. 3a 

Stisck Temp. y7s 

Pitot Coeff. 

% ivtoisture 

C Factor 0. °ti O S 

Start Time L) 9,1 S 

Avg. A P D. ZCP, Pre-Test 6 001 w 1 0 In. Hg. 

Ref. a P Post-Test O ") • In. Hg. 

Desired Noaleo, 33-1 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 3. v In. H,0 

Nozzle No. 34M-Oq Z Post-Test Pitot <0.1 3. S" In. H,0 

Noale Calibracion 0• 3 f 0 0.311 0. 3 11 

Nozzle Diameter 6,311 Observer 

End Time Oy 11 Agency 

IVOMOGR; lPff SET-UP LF.4X CbfECXS 

Sansple 

Point 

CIock 

Time 

Drv Gas 

Meter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Readiag 

0. P 

rn. H2O 

Oriftce 

Setting .:1H 

Inches H2O 

Ideal Rctual 

Drv Gas 

Meter 

Temperature °F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

Vacuum 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. i 

Temp 

°F 

I 

R/ o.o 1 P4 . 60 0.30 1.4% I.SO yZ 41 H.0 `24 y 1 

Z 2.S 34, z0 o. 1.e5 I. ~os y4 41 4•5 25d y1 

3 S.o t ~n . $S l.tou 1.b0 yS ~}1 253 `Iv 

Al ~.5 t39. 1 0•~ I. S ~ I.. ~'1 4z . 0 Z 4Z 

/o• o I.2y ,34 8 I. 'ig 4 5•c~ IS15 `i3 

G 2 • 5 142 .ti o- 3 u 1. 4 8 l. 50 50 43 5. o 4 9,7 . 1w 44 . 

/5 o I 2 o.Z5 I.ZI r.zo 51 43 40 4 Z 

/7•5 14to- 11 o.ZZ r. ola 1.10 S'Z 1(43 4.0 -Y85 2.4 

9 Zo , o 14 *1. 5 O-Zi 11. 0 S I, of SZ 43 3. 5 49.5 25t 4to 

io zZ .5 5. o. -zl .c,S 53 414 'j• 5 2S-7 y 

i/ zs,o r5o•3z, ai o. ~3 0.$3 C,4 (45 3•0 4 L,5 ts 4-7 

12 z?.5 j51. ~01 0.1 0•%3 WaZ 54 y S 5• 0 

,C3 i 30.0 157 -84 0. 0.$8 0.hl 3.0 4cDo I z4S 4 ~ 

Z 3z. S 154.1S 0-ij b. oo 0.916 54 4l. 3-0 %15 ZSZ 4to 

3 35.0 159.43 0•19 0.93 0.9 54 4b 3.0 41, tSo y5 

3-7.6- 1S4•79 0.19 6•93 0. 5 q(* .0 4-70 .245 45 

5 yb.o 1`b. D.i°~ 6.13 0 -CF5 Sb 41 3.0 4 t5$ 4 

~ 1S .145 5 6•21 t.65 !.0 5(• y 3.S 46-1 7.55 yb 

ys • o Ic.o. 5 6-31 !. 5 6 51 4 5.0 41.3 Z15L 48 

8 IV7.5' IWz•Sb 6.10 1.4% 1.50 5S 4S •0 4 wo Z53 ~t 

9 So.a 11,4. i o.Z"1 .35 I•3 59 99 y 24 0 

io z 5 c, .~ O.z.s 1.zr 1•i.c, 9 y9 y•0 4 y 15 o 

SS.o 1 67.20o Ca.4 1.15 I• I S 5 4 4•v μ y ZS 5 ~ 

12- S7.5 r03.Z S 6 ,7.4 I.tS 1•15 c. 45 yo 473 2so 5 

if :; ; . 3 •~ o. Z " 1.22. ; • _ : :: ~ . 

Audited by: kc- Date: 

I,a Ia.It 

en~ ~ 
Isokineric Field Dara Sheer - EP.a .Vlerhod Z(c ,# 

Client / I~/E 'q~- B~/~ C~ Run Vumb Z 

Citv/State / %4O",S~ .A/C Date 3 - W ' /8 

Samplin¢ Location B''~K'~ K'e.~/ ~'s~AelSr ~ iY~ • SAAWT Operators.)?k AM 

Bar. Press.. [n. HgZI • 51 NOMOG&IPH SET-UP LF.rIK CFIECXS 

Static Press.. In. H 2O - y' ~ 5 ,i-I ia 1.4.e Y= 1 •U0 Avg. A P O. ZS Pre-Testa• n Uy g _(t) (n. Hg. 

Meter Box No. ~W -03S Meter Temp. S S Ref. .A P n. 37 Post-Testd• 00 Z 'F-v _1_ r[n. He.. 

Sample Box No. I Z- Stack Temp. 47 < Desired Noale0.343 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 g 1.Z y 3, o[n. H,0 

ProbeuPitot vo.?.c4.M44 Pitot Coeff. O. ~~ Noale No. 09 L Post-Test Pitot <0.1 Fv 'l•5 3. 5 (n. H,0 

Probe Temp. Setting 2 s y % Moistute 'a Nozzie Calibration6.11 0 o.-m 1 

Sample ID No. ? i 9 1-a° C Factor C) •9 14 Noale Diameter Observer 

Filter No. '#*/*+ Start Time O et 4 Sa End Time 1051 Agency 

Sample 

Point 

Ctock 

Tlate 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Cubic Feet 

Pitot 

Reading 

O.P 

in. H2O 

Orifice 

Setting SH 

Inches H2O 

Ideal Actual 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

Temperazure'F 

Inlet Outlet 

Pump 

\lacuum 

Inches 

Hg 

Stack 

Terttp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F 

Imp. ~ 

Temp 

'F ` 

I 

A/ 0.0 11 .u1 o.'3'1 1. 1. (35 5 '7 3• L) 411 25z 

Z 2.5 177 - `61 .~(o I•V 1,8t S~ 3. o gio ZS ~ 

.3 S.o n .40 1.9S .qS Sto q qqy ZSN Z 

Y 7. 5 r17(,.5 3 o, Yo IAs I.qS SY q s yaS 7_S3 q Z 

S 1 /o.o h, 1•`b'f 1. 065 GO I 5O 3.5 4°10 2S% 43 

G 12.5 1 000•Zz o. 35 : 7' t~Z S 1 3.5 485 z 4 4 . 

I,S• 0 1 Z. o cD O : Z•8 . 3 l. y-o 5°b So Zlo 0 

17•,T .2.io 2 1.30 57 50 Cf 

9 Zo.o IR>S.Z'~ o.'ZS 1 .z s1 z(-o `Il4 

o zz .5 18 75 b.Z3 . z 1.10 55 Sl Z• 47S' 2cEo 45 

i/ 25.0 1$S.z4 0Z'1. I.oB l.lo r Z• 4(ol 140 45 

/2 z7. 5 1 . 70 b -ZZ. 1.os Oo 54 51 1 P(P v 

L3 / 30.0 151 .15 0.2) J.c 2 l.oa 5 ► 5 z5U 

z 32 . S 197. S S o• z.2 l. o SG 51 z. 4 'L5 b 44 

3 35-a 193.9 o. !•!Z l.lo 5-7 51 2•5 4 9 Zoo 

37. s I 01. 6 .Z'L 11,09 00 9 51 2. 493 4 S 

S Ald. 0 91.• .2.3 I. IZ l. ~0 59 5Z 2•5 49 t5Z 

~ Y2.6 1 a .z O•? 3 1. 51 7.5 941!5' 25 4t. 

y6 • o• 199 .7y .3 Z 1 58 l. 4oO lo 0 Sl 3.0 7-53 L4 b 

8 1l7.5' toi.5 0.3 1.1 < -'K 53 3.0 '-19(o Zc*o La 

9 So.o zo3.Z1 0•30 1.49 .5o b( S 3.0 450 z55 4 b 

/~ 2 5 d~• ~ V.u. i•z.~ 1• LoZ 53 10 4a6 Z S`1 41 

55.0 Zo q 0.21 /. O //v 6 2•5 4,) ZS f so 

/L 57.5 zJl• 0.21 11. oz /. O0 cDZ- 1;3 2. 4-1 S Ztoo o 

&0•0 z(>k , z5 S 

: 

38 Z.Z o.z8 ~ •38 . : 

)se 91.7 

iudited toq: Pf '-- Date:3, 11" 

QA B-12 E7!ArJ 
i 

lsokinetic Field Data Slreet - EP.-1 .f✓lethod 2(a ,4 

Client F,-/E H'a•- E7o'.A.- Run vumber 3 

citvistate //4oisCA/, ~lC D ate 3 - ~,b - /8 

SamplingLocation B~K'~ .K~u✓ EX~A~ST -/Y~ • s l~~r Operators ~ P1L 10A 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg Z4 55 • NOMOGI?APhf SET-UP LF11X CNECKS 

Static Press.. In. H :O 'o' LS OFi ;-,3 ~ . ~eL Y bV Avg. ~ P ~ Z~ Pre-Test U.00Z w In. H;. 

Meter Box Yo. ~°' V3~' MeterTemp. Ll7 Ref. a,P y ' 37 Post-Test0-oDZ' IF,, 2 In. Hg. 

Sample Box No. 1Z Stack Temp. 4 95 Desired Noale0• 333 Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 r7P.

, C' In. H,0 

ProbeuPitot Yo.2eO - 034 Pitot Coeff: 0• S u Noale No. 3c70.U4? Post-Test Pitot <0.1 S') In. H:0 

Probe Temp. Setting I Se) % Moisture 9+ Noale CalibrationO. ; 1 t7 0. 3 0 O. 3 1 

Sample ID No. ?l91 ' 0 7 C Factor 41 2-3 Noale Diametero. 311 Observer 

FiIter No. 4JA- Start Time Il D L End Time Agencv 

Dry Gas Pitot Orifice Drv Gas Pump Stack Filter [mp. 

Sarnple Ciock Meter 

p Reading Setting .1H Meter Yacuum Temp Box Temp 

Point Time Cubic Feet & P Inches H2O Tempenture °F Inches °F °F °F 

in. H2O Ideal Actual Inlet Outlet Hg 

A / 0. 0 Z0q. 144 0.20 6.19 6, sci Slo D 46 4 25 y(c 

Z 2.5' 110.1 o•zz- r-og 1.10 Si s 4 q 

3 5.c 1. Z3 6.Z3 ).,Z 1.10 S5 SZ 3.5 41 Z. 

~ 7. 5 1 3.c, 9 b.-t 1 I. o-t. 1.00 y S1 .Z 4 Z54 43 

S /o. o ZiS.eto o.Z,'z 1.046 1.10 l.z. S4 3.5 y 1105 4te 

G 12 • 5 L AtA 0•2A .1'1 120 LZ 53 4.o 14q tSS 4~ 

ISo 21 ta.oz 0•33 I APS 1. G5 43 54 S•U UAA 2-V0 4 

is 17•S' ZI°k.'7S o 3y I.ea 1.70 (*q 54 S•S Lir, I z5q 

Lt1.53 f. S I. 1,4 5 .0~- 4 la 153 49 

.n 7•1 S 77 ,%.7r_ A'Ly c 11 1 1_7 Ley CLl I Q 1-1 44,[7 Z53 SO ~ Z 5. 0 1 27-4 . Z I o Z,Z I 1. O$ o 14.0 4l1 V41 

I ~ Z 27.5 L2to .30 0•Z ( . oZ , 00 L. . y Z.SZ. e.3 ~ 

.!3 3o.0 17-7. 0•35 1.75- 1.7 16 SV 5.6 yIlo I ISS6 5 1 

Z 3L.S zzq.49 0•34 1.t8 130 We S -a 4"71 7-93 1 57 1 

3 36.0 31. Z 0. % . 8 1,90 b*7 5 7 .v ! q 7'1 1 Z(eo 51 

37. s . Jz o• 38 /. S 7 1• 90 6 9 8 G. o 47 8 

5 A/d.o Z. "a. . S 1.S G 57 6.0 41Z v 

6 .S 2.8 0.33 1. 6!; ), 657 We 58 47t, zto l S 

'/s' o'. z3$.coz 6196 1 .qo 00 4-4 S7 S:o 473 S'y Slf 

8 4l7. S" tyo• 37 0.-Zgr I.zl I. 7 c3 ~ 

489 U.z 55 

9 So.o Z41. y 6.2y ).n 120 W 59 L4 10 q g Ztoz 55 

ia i 5 zU?. 37 0.V4 1.11 1. Zo (1 S IPo 14. 0 qW Z 59 S 

55• c 7-y4.8 0.7.3 1.1z l.lo (o5' 1,0 4. 0 471 759 54 

i2 57.5 2.4c..4'~ 6A3 1.17- D y o 47 Z59 55 

~• o Z~{ 8 S 

.(~ 

, ~s. 0.Z1 ~.3c~ s :: `Ig~'O 

A 

~ 

udited by: N `•~ Date: 

Q ~ Q 

g-1J ~ 
APPENDIX C 

LABORATORY DATA 

C-1 ! 
Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

6200 Harris Technology Blvd. 

Charlotte, NC 28269 

Pine Hall Brick 

(046-97-191) 

Analytical Report 

(0398-05/19) 

EPA Method 26A 

Hydrogen chloride 

Hydrogen fluoride 

.~ Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

3211 Bramer Drive 

Raleigh, IVC 27604 

919/550-4392 

c? 

/-d 
i Summary of Res-u , lts 

i 

I 

~ _; 

~~~ 
. ComPat~y:;; 

Aaal)ist;': 

Fasaiaetets : 

, , 

# 5am Ies'. 

Tri on/Pine Hall Brick :> Client:#:: 

;;:: Eiithaipyl.~.. 

PO #: 

>:::.: ... . . . . ,.... 

R it MWI 

046-97-191 

BGH 0398-05/19 

HCI. HF AM 772?/7728 

8 03/ 19/98 If 

eo;~a '`fi~

<:;:<: :::> ''.: `:'.::;;:.. '. :' 

::``':::;:.::::;' .:: ..... .:;': 

~ mtc8~ < . 

Pink Paver Bricks 7191.01 7191-02 7191-03 7191-04 

Hydrogen Fluoride 93,940 108,740 87,814 < 163 

Hydrogen Chloride 21,513 23,119 22,401 < 163 

Red Paver Bricks 7191-09 7191-08 7191-07 7191-08 

Hydrogen Fluoride 61,502 64,459 79,450 < 225 

Hydrogen Chloride 15,109 16,797 18,455 < 225 

Reviewed by: 

QA: 04A 

Ste J. Eckard 

Anatyst: lt- i~,— 

Bruce G. Hawks 

Date: L ~ 

Date: 

/ . 

p 

-- --- - ~ . 

~

., 

~e:~ 1:VOB598V03%0396-0SW398-05.W82 13:40 03/20~ 

v 
Results 

, 

. 

F

~ C _ 5 

~t ~~ ~. ... .-,.. _ _ 1- Z 
~ 

m 

Y 

0~. 

b 

G: 

E e E =a c G 

0 

s 

„ ~ N 

rl O~ Q 

L 

~ y R 

~ ~ u pZ 

U 

V 

r 

Z 

` U 

~ CT 

U 

~ 

~ 

~ 

I 

F Z W 

.~ y.. 

I ~ 

= E 

m 

„~`~ z 
L ~

. 

r 

i N- 

~ ? ^ Y 

3 

0 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

aR; ~ ~... 

L 

C 

c e~. a c 

M 

N ~ 

a

° 

m 

c n 

z 

~ 

Ur 

L 

i~ 

U T~+ 

~Y 

~ ~L 

} 

J Q 

_ F~ 

Z 

W 

~~ . 

, s 

0 

~' ~ L 

210 Di■ 

zm~ 1 

I 

,_, tv 0 
Narrative Summary 

I. 

c_s 

~~ 
Enthalpy Analytical Narrative Summary 

Com 'any:;:. Tri on/Pine Hall Brick 

Cliestt*;:: 046-97-191 

Pf} # AM-7722/7728 

03 98-05/ 19 

"ai I.T.2rameterl: BGH 

. HCI. HF 

The first lot of samples was received on 03/04/98 and the second lot was received 

on 03/ 10/98 by Scott Grosshandler after being relinquished by Paul Jenkins of 

Trigon Engineering. Samples were cold upon arrival and kept cold during 

storage. Prior to and during analysis they were kept under lock with access only 

to authorized personnel of Enthalpy Analytical, Inc. 

The samples were analyzed for hydrogen fluoride (HF) and hydrogen chloride 

(HCl) according to the procedures outlined in the EPA Method 26A. 

Quantitation was performed with a Hewlett Packard series 1100 High 

Performance Liquid Chrornatograph with a Waters 430 conductivity detector. 

Separation was accomplished by a Hamilton PRP-X100 150 mm s 4.1 mm anion 

exchange column using 2 mM sodium benzoate pH 6.4 as the eluent at 1.5 mL 

per minute. 

The samples exhibited peak broadening of the HF and HCl peaks. C 18 and 

barium sulfate removal solid phase extraction of the samples did not remove the 

cause of the peak broadening. Sample 7191-01 HF concentration was confirmed 

by ISE analysis. 

Before and after sample analysis, a six point calibration curve was prepared and 

analyzed. The linearity coefficients of the HF curve and the HCl curve were 

0.9996 and 0.9995, respectively. 

The following table shows approximate retention times for each analyte. 

Analvte Retention rtme 

Hydrogen fluoride .......................................4.30 

Hydrogen cliloride .......................................5.25 

OK 

OK 

em, 

MDL — Minimum Detection Liniit. 

LOQ — Limit of Quantitation. 

~ C-9 0398-05.doc 

~ ~ 
Sample Custody 

1w,, X f/-, 
\< 

, jj 

~. a 

\• v~•~ a~ 

ti 

\ ~• .:. ~:. ~ y = Q 

~:~ .~.:.. \ 

z u 

• ~~., .~ 

CZ 

d5'

r 14 [ 

~ \ 

 ~ . 

~; ~ ~ z ~, r •; . 

~ 

~ 

y 

~ ~` ~ C _ ~' 

- _ ~ o ~ • V ~r a. ~.~ ~J~-~ 

~ 

~ 

~ \ ~ 

` ~ ~ ~~•.' `O -. 

~... Gi^ 

.ri .. 

~r 

10 

~ ' ' •~:. L 

~:. +'~ ~ . ° f'. ;,• i► C 

3~. ? 2 iy ~ •~ tr' • 

C~ ~ ~, ~ — ~ •y ~ y 

.oO. C~ = GC ~ 

•~ • 

° E ~ ~ ~ `• ~ 3 r,--t _ 

/. C 
\ 

V 

... .. 

4. 

1

~ 

1 C 

~ ~ H +r 

~ o ~ ~..► _ m m ~ 

'~~:~~ '~> ~5 C 

~ ~ :' A~l::.: .~ ~ v ~' \ •~ . 

: Vi~,:- L,~•i O .,, ..";~L..:. ~ \ u ~♦ / 

Q+• 

ra ibc 

- ~ ~ - 

~ ~ ~ 'r ~~~: ~ ~• ^ ~ . 

J \ 

- ..~ . 'V~ ~.r .'~.:. ~.: ~' 

~:.

7 

, ►- ♦ - 

_ - 

O 

6. 

E E 1 

cc cc 

C: 

..:., v 

~: , A` • ~ `, b L 

* '". ~ r~ C C — e.~. 

:> ~ ~ _ •- 

~. :: w ~ ~, ~ ~ •~; ~~~ ~~ ~ -- 

~ 

~ ~ t 

~ c - 12 

,~~ 
Sam'ple . 

Chromatograms 

.~ 

~ r_i; ,7 , 
= ~ i.e c : \,HPC::=M\,3\DATA'`\ 1998DATA\im.AR_98\0398-OSA\006-1101.D 7191 - 01 *_; 

7 inal voume = 500 ml 

"zject_,n Date : 12-Mar-98, 18:13:32 Seq. Line 

------------------- 

: 11 

Sample :;ame 7191-01 *11 Vial 6 

?.cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of an'_or.s Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A1006-1101.0) 

uS II ~ 

~ U 

Q 

601.719 

kn 

rea: 185.515 

0 1 2 3 a 5 min 

External Standard Report 

5orted 3y Signal 

Calib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 P.M 

Mu?ti iolier 1.0000 

:Dilution 1.0000 

3ignal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[mi n] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.305 MF 601.71924 2.77607e-2 16.70413 Hydrogen F? ,-or=de 

5.254 FM 185.51534 1.96144e-2 3.63877 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals : 20.34290 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 1 4 
a_a F;le F:\,HPC:EM\3\DATA\1998DATA\;m-AR_98\0398-05A\006-1201.D 

Final voume = 500 ml 

--------------- 

'nject=on Date 

.SamDle Name 

Acq_ Operator 

Acq. Method 

Analysis Method 

Last changed 

lnalysis ~ of ani( 

: 12-Mar-98, 18:20:02 

: 7191-01 *11 

: BGH 

: HFQ-NEXT.M 

: F:\ ?iPCHEM\3\METHODS\03 

: 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 

Dns Ion by Waters 430 IC 

Seq. Line 12 

Vial 6 

Inj i 

98-05A.M 

BGH 

- PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-OSA',006-1201.0) 

uS v „ 

_ ~ a 

o ~ 

4g?%ce,a: 632.362 -5 

_ \ TgArea: 214 703 

x ~ a ~ 

N 

Q ;(j 

N 

/ 

/ 

~ 

~ 

I ~ 

I 

i0 — 

0— 

0 1 2 3 4 5 min 

-------------------- 

External Standard Report 

S o rt ed 3y S ignal 

Calib. Data Modified Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

mult iDlier 1.0000 

~ iluticn . 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

Ret'I'ime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s; [ug/ml] 

---- -I------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.384 MF 632.36176 2.76044e-2 17.45595 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.248 FM 214.70261 1.94872e-2 4.18396 Hydrogen Chloride 

'^otals 21.63991 

Results obtained with enhanced intzgrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C-l5 ~~ 

30 — 

00 — 

a0 — 

FA 
'~H~C :~NI\3'' DA ~'z`~ ,,998DATA\ ~LkR 98\0398-OSr~,\007-1:sO1 .D 

5'inal voume = 500 ml 

'njection Dace 12-Mar-98, 18:26:34 Seq. Line 13 

ample Name : 7191-02 *11 Vial : 7 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Accq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

inal_vsis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M 

Lasc changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 1C (0398-05A1007-1301.0) 

uS _ a a 

- 

~ o` 

L 

- 

~ 

~ a 

U 

c 

y 

a - 80 - ' 

 _ 

~39~4 Area: 21-7 :68 

s 

Ex*_ernal Standard Report 

Sorzed By Signal 

Cal i b. Da•ta Modi f ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10 : 27 : 32 P.M 

mu'_ciplier. 1.0000 

Dilucion 1.0000 

Sigr.al 1: ADC1 A, Wacer 430 IC 

RecT_me Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] 

---- 

[ug/ml] 

------- ~ ------ ~ ----------i------ ~ ---------- ~ -- ~ ------------------ 

4.386 MF 707.69446 2.72777e-2 19.30427 Hydrogen 

5.242 FM 237.06790 1.94110e-2 4.60172 Hydrogen Chloridz 

Totals : 23.90599 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 16 / 

.rl .. 'I /, n /nn , ., -.. .... — .,..,' 
zza =,-e F :\. --;.PCH`.M\3\L,ATA\1998DA'`A\`vIAR_98\0398-05A\007-140i.D _S---U2 °-_ 

F:nal voume = 500 ml 

njectiori Date 12-Mar-98, 18:33:08 Seq. Line 14 

,,ample Name : 7191-02 *11 Vial : 7 

Acq. Operator BGH Inj 1 

~CQ. Merhod : :?FL-NEXT.M 

Ar_alysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

A.r of an=ons Ion by Wacers 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADC1 a, `Nater 430 IC k0398-05A1G07-1401.0) 

,S 

~ s 

v L 

ao - 

ti 

60 - 

/ 

- 1 I 

40 - 

20 - 

0- 

0 1 2 3 4 5 rnrt 

External Standard Report 

j0rred By Signal 

Calib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

mu1 ti pli er. 1.0000 

~ :Dilution 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

~ RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] (uS*s'] (ug/ml] 

~ ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.383 BV 716 09204 2 72455e-2 19 51031 Hydrogen Fluor_de 

5.218 VB 194.42979 1.95715e-2 3.80528 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals 23.31559 

Resslts obtained with enhanced integrator! 

~ *** End of Report *** 

C-17 ~ 
..:\nPCLEM\3\.Z)ATA\1998DATA\NLA2_98\0398-05A\008-1501.D ;_ ~~ -q; 

= ~ na1 voume = 520 ml 

' Injection Date 12-Mar-98, 18 58 31 Seq Line 15 

Sample Name : 7191-03 *11 Vial : 8 

~ acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

' Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

~nalysis of anions .Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr. 

AOC1 A, 'Nater ,1'30 iC ;0398-05A\008-1501.0) 

' us 

1 (~ 

- C 

~ • ~ ~ 

O ~ O 

530. 905 ~ 30 — =Area: 196.889 

C ~ 

1 

~ 

i I! 

a0 — 

~ = ~ 

z0 _ 

0- 

1 0 1 3 4 G Tin 

External Standa=d Report 

l Sorted Bv . Signal 

Calib. Data Modi==ed Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 1 Multi ~ lier

Dilution 

: 1.0000 

1.0000 

~ Sig:Zal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

(minJ 

- ------ ~ ------ ~ ---------- 

(uS*sJ (ug/mlJ 

~ ------------------ 

4.395 MF 530.90540 

I ---------- 

2.81909e-2 

I ---------- 

14.96669 Hydrogen Fluor'-de 

5.253 FM 196.88921 1.95603e-2 3.85122 Hydrogen Chloride 

, Totals : 18.81791 

Results obtair_ed with enhanced integrator! 

~ --------------------------------- 

*** End of Report *** 

~ C - 18 ~~ 
~a~ a c'__e F:\HPC:EM\3\DATA\1998DATP.\MAr2_98\0398-05A\008-1o'01.D 03 =y- 

~:;'inal voume = 520 ml 

_____________________________________________________________________ Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 19:05:04 Seq. Line : 16 

Samo1e Name : 7191-03 *11 Vial : 8 

Acq_ Operator BGH Inj 1 

~cq. Method 'rIFQ-NEXT.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 ~ olumn 

ADC1 ,i, Water 430 IC (0398-0SA\008-1601.0) 

uS 

- 0 

~ 

3 

- 

~ U 

rea: 203.0 ,19 

N 

Q N 

7 y~ " I i 

60 ; 

_ I 

s0 — r 

. j . 

I 

20 — 

0- 

0 1 2 i 1 5 min 

---------- ------------ 

External Standard Report 

Sorted By Signal 

Ca1ib. Data Modif ied Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilution 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

(minl [uS * s l [ug/m1 l 

-- 4 412 MF I ----I 56231647 279867e-2 I I-- 1573737 I--I Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.248 FM 203.84894 1.95303e-2 3.98122 Hydrogen Chloride 

I Totals : 19.71859 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

----------------------- 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 19 ~~ 
a -_le F:\.:PCHEM\3\,DATA ~,1998DALA\~ 98\0398 - OSa\OC9-1701.D 

F-na1 voume = 450 ml 

:jection Date 12-Mar-98, 19:11:34 Seq Line 17 

5ample Name : 7191-05 *11 Vial : 9 

Acq. Operator BGH Inj 1 

icq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPC'iEM\3\METHODS`\ 0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 coiumn 

AQC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\009-1 7101.0) 

us 

~ — 

~ U 

. c c 

61 y 

a ~ 

' ~ O 

C j 

~~

~06.921 5 ^ a c ~=~1rea: 1 o._C., 

Q N 

60 — 

. ~ 

40 — 

20 

 _ 

0— 

F 1 5 

Ex=- =rna1 Standard Report 

Scrted By Signal 

Ca'_ib. Data Modified Friday, 

Mu lier 1.0000 

Dilution 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

2etTime Type Area Amt/Area Amounc Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/m2] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.481 MF 406.92102 2.93047e-2 11.92469 Hydrogen F1uc==de 

5.208 FM 156.80457 1.97856e-2 3.10248 Hydrogen Chloride 

?'otals : 15.02716 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - ?0 
'aca =i1e =:\HPC1EM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\009-1801.D 7191-05 ;:= 

Final voume = 450 ml 

Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 19:18:07 Seq. Line : 18 

Sample Name : 7191-05 *11 Via1 : 9 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Acq. Methcd : HFL-NEXT.M 

Analysis Method : r^:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of anions T_on by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-OSA\009-1801.0) 

U.5 

~ 

~ 

U 

C 

a a 0 

80 - 

. ~ 

Q v, 

~ 

40 - I 

20 - I 

i 

- ~ 

~ ~ I 0- 

~ 3 4 

----------------------- 

External Standard Repor*_ 

' Sorted By 

Calib. Data Modified 

~ Multiplie= 

Dilut=on 

Signal 

Fr=day, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

1.0000 

1.0000 

Signai 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

(min] [uS*s] (ug/ml] I ------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--I------------ ------ 

4.480 PV 447.67093 2.88705e-2 12.92450 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.184 VB 151.43234 1.98249e-2 3.00213 Hydrogen Chloride 

1 . :otals : 

~ Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

-------------------- 

*** End of Report 

: ('_It 

15.92663 
F :',:?PCa=M\,3\DATA\1998LATA\M.r~R_98\0398-05r3\010-1901.D 7131-06 *11 

Final voume = 450 ml 

njection Dace 12-Mar-98, 19:43:19 Seq Line 19 

.~ ample Name : 7191-06 *11 Vial : 10 

acq. Operator : BGH Inj 

acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Analysis MeLhod : F:\HPC:•iEM\3\METH0DS\0398-05A.M 

~ asc char_ged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM b_v BGH 

.Azialysis of an=ons ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr: 

ADC1 A,'Nater4301C (0398-05AZ10-1901.0) 

uS 

~+- U _ _ e 

30 — ~ ''' •. r451. J37 

' ~ Q 

N 

~ I 

20 — 

J— 

.77079 

0 1 2 3 4 5 rnin 

EXLernal Standard Recort 

Sor`zd By Signal 

Ca'-ib. Data Mcdi=ied . Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

~Iul_ ~ blier 1.0000 

Di_uZion 1.0000 

Sicnal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

Rec 7 ime TypeAr:a Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[minJ [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- 

 I 

 ------ 

 I 

 ---------- 

 I 

 ---------- 

 I 

 ---------- ------------------ 

4.477 Mr^ 451.03732 2.88382e-2 13.00710 Hydrogen Fluori::e 

5.244 FM 177.07924 1.96589e-2 3.48119 Hydrogen Chloride 

"'ica? s : 16.48828 

Rzsults obtained wich enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 12 ~~-' 
-A:i' =:93ZA'='A ,XA-R 9 S ,J393 - 05A\010-200 - ' 

. -r.alvoume = 450 ml 

Injection Date 12-Mar-98, 19:50:04 Seq Line 20 

3mple,Name : 7191-06 *11 Vial : 10 

.-~ cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Acq . Method r_5'Q-NEXT . M -

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADC1 a, 'Nater a30 IC ;0398-OSA',010-2001.D) 

uS II ~ 

a` 3 

Cf y O j 

7 j 

'~2~`~~rea: 167.64 

~ N 

60 — 

40 — 

20 — 

0— 

0 1 2 3 min 

External Standa=d Report 

Sorted By Signa? 

Calib. Data Mod=f_ed Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilut ion i.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime T•ype Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] (uS*s] (ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.485 MF 452.25372 2.88266e-2 13.03694 Hydrogen Fluor=de 

5.234 FM 167.66374 1.97140e-2 3.30532 Hydrogen Chlor=de 

Totals : 16.34226 

.,esults obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C '-3) 

I v 1 -T - ncz . 1 -2 nn,r nw 
i r 

i 

60 – 

20 - 

0- 

Q N 

\F-iPCHEM`,-~ \Da:'A\1998DaI'A\:~R_98\0398-O5A\011-2101 .D -:.--:'-'- ,-. 

rinal voume = 450 ml 

:njectior_ Date : 12-Mar-98, 19:56:35 Seq. Line 

------------- 

: 21 

SamDle Name 7191-07 *11 Vial 11 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

?_cq. Method HFQ-SAME.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

; Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

I – AOC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-05A\011-2101.0) 

uS 

t J 

:~f 

O 

7 

J 

a: 585 . 983 

— i?~,Area: 

0 1 2 3 4 5 mirt 

External Standard Reoort 

' Sorted By 

Ca'_ib. Data Modif_ed 

~ Multiplier : 

ution 

S icxnal 

Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

1.0000 

1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

(min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- ~ ------ ~ ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.468 MF 585.98267 2.78473e-2 16.31803 Hydrogen Fluor=de 

5.221 FM 200.01706 1.95466e-2 3.90965 Hydrogen Chloride 

; "otals : 20.22767 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

- ----------- 

*** End of Report *** 

C 24 ~~ 
:az3 F _:e F: \HPCFiEM\3\DA'I-'-%\1998DATA\im.r'1R_98\0398-05A\011-2201 .D 7191-07 --- 

Fl-nal voume = 450 ml 

injection Datz : 12-Mar-98, 20:03:05 Seq. 

---------------------- 

Line : 22 

Sample Name : 7191-07 *11 Viai : 11 

i Acq. Otierator : BGH Inj : 1 

yccr . Mechod : HFL-NEX"' . M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M 

~ Lasc char_ged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-05A\01 1-2201. 0) 

~ uS o ' 

LL U 

~ a 

0 

a0 _ ~ ~cea: So' ~a~rea: ' 80.589 

60 — 

( ~ I ~ 

i 

• , 

i 

40 — 

1 . 

20 - 

0- 

0 1 2 3 4 5 mirt 

--------- 

External Standard Re-corz 

Sor_ed 3y Signal 

_ali5. Daca Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

mul`:t1'er 1.0000 

Dilut=on 1.0000 

Signal -. ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime 'I'ype Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

(min] (uS*s1 [ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--I------------------ 

4.479 MF 564.18066 2.79753e-2 15.78311 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.198 FM 180.58949 1.96399e-2 3.54676 Hydrogen Chloride 

"otals 19.32986 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C 25 ~~ 
:_le F:\HPCHEM\3\DATA\19981DATP.\MAR_98\0398-05A\017-3301.D 

-P;-n.alvoume = 325 ml 

---------------- 

:n j ection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:33:40 Seq. Line : 33 

Sample Name : 7191-04 Vial : i7 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sea,uencz File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

rast changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH• 

Analysis oi anions Ion by Wat=_s 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADC1 A. 'Nacer 430 IC (0398-05A\017-3301.0) 

uS ' 

0- — 

0 1 2 3 4 - 'nrrt 

External Standard ReDort 

-------------------=------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- 

Sorted By . Signal 

Cal_b'. Data Modified Fridav, Ma=ch 13, 1998 10:27:32 P1M 

multioli er 1.0000 

Dilution 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

R?t'I'ime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/m1) 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.208 - - - Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.231 - - - Hydrogen Chloride 

~ otals : 0.00000 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

1 Warnings or Errors : 

C-26 
:a_a File r:\NPC?:EM\3\DATA\19981DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\017-3401.D 7191-c 

=inal voume = 325 ml 

---------------------- 

Inj2ction Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:40:12 Seq. Line : 34 

Sampl-- Name : 7191-04 Vial : 17 

Acq. Operator BGH Inj 1 

Secuence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

,~.nalvsis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analvsis of anior_s Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRD-x100 150x4.1 columr_ 

AOC1 A, 'Nater 430 IC (0398-05AQ17-3401.0) 

us 

 J 1 2 3 4 5 rnin . 

External Standard Report 

Sorted By. Signal 

 Calib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilut'_on 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--I------------- --- -- 

4.208 - - - Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.231 - - - Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals : • ••••• 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! ~ 

1 Warnings or Errors : 

f, ~17 
DA'='~`~ -998D ~_ `_\NI~ 98 0398-05 ~ 018-350' . L J ~ 

?

4Lnal voume = 450 ml 

------------ 

njection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:46:43 Seq. Line : 35 

3ample Name : 7191-08 Vial : 1n 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

sequence File : F:\HPCuEM\3\SEQUENC--~ \1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-SP.ME.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\ME 7-':iODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 3GH 

Analvs_s of ar._or_s Ion by Waters 430 iC - PRP-x100 150x4 .? column 

AOC1 A, `Nater 430 IC ;0398-05A\018-3501.0) 

us i 

- ~ 

80 - 

v 

a 

. N 

• \ ~ 

40 — 

20 — 

0— 

a 5 rin 

External Star_dard Reoort 

Sorted By Signal 

Calib'. Data Modi -;2.ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

mul tiplier 1.0000 

'ilution 1.0000 

Sigr_al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Ar?a Amt/Area Amcunt Grp Name 

[min] [uS*sl (ug/ml] 

------- ~ ------ ~ ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.208 - - - Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.231 - - - Hydrogen Chlor=de 

.`otals • ••••• 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

1 Warnings or Errors : 

C-28 A(1 
1 -aca File F:\ ciPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\018-3601.D ' 779:- ~ ; 

Final voume = 450 ml 

Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:53:15 Seq. Line : 36 

f Sample Name : 7191-08 vial : 18 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequence F=1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 1 Acq. Method : HFQ-END.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHCDS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

?.na?Isis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr_ 

~ ADC1 A. `Nater 430 IC (0398-OSA1018-3601.0) 

us ; 

~ 80 - 

l 

i 40= ; 

; 

i = ' 0— _ 

~ 0 1 2 3 

~ External Standa=d Report ---_-___- 

~ Sorted By

t 

- : Signal 

Ca1ib. Daa Modiried Fr=day, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 ?1M 

Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilution 1.0000 

~ Si nal 1: ADC1 A Water 430 IC g , 

~ RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[minl [uS*sl [ug/mll 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1 -- 1 ------------------ 1 4.208 = _ _ Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.231 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals : 0.00000 

I Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

1 Warnings or Errors : ?~, ! ~ ,~ 
Curve(s)/QA Point(s) 

Chromatograms 

~ ,. C_30 

. ~ 
~ri1\3`\MET :CDS\HF'Q-.NIEAT.M of 12%29; 97 5 .03 . Io' PM 

Method Infor:nation 

~?nalvs=s of ar_ions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

-- --- 

I ANALOG- DIGIT~L CONVERTER 

l escriat ion: 

zcu= -e

_ 

Er.i _s /Vo! t : 

= eakwi dth (Data Rate) . 

't= Time : 

~ aza Storace: 

Start data: 

Stop data: 

Sianal 1 

Water 430 T_C 

S igr:al 

uS 

1000.000 

0.053 Min (5.00 Hz) 

No Limit 

A11 

Signal 2 

ALC1 CHANNEL B 

Signal 

RIU 

999999.973 

2.660 Min (0.10 Hz ) 

Same As Sicnal 1 

Part-ial. - 

0.01 Min 

0.01 Min Larz- Signal Source: External Devic_ Will Starc 35900 

~

_:ned Event Table : 

<:'io eve_Tlt j > 

C 31 -P,5~ 
.._-:"cd. _ . \'riFCH EM\?\,.` ~IL.Ti-?CLj\H ~ Q-N~AT.M Of 12/29/97 5.03 .15 PM 

------------------------- 

HP 1100 Quate=nary Pump 1 

~ Cor_trcl 

Flow 1.500 ml/min 

Stopti:ne 6.00 min 

I Posttime Off 

5c1 rents 

Solvent A : 0. 0 °s ( 30 a ~IeOH) 

Soven~ 3 Cff 

I 

~. 

Solvent C 100.0 s(2 mM NaSenzoat_ pFi 6.1) 

c o lver ='J 0.0 a( 2 R1M iZHP Pt'I 6.2) 

~ -r=ssureLimits 

M_r.imum Pressure 0 bar 

~ Maxi;num Pressur_ -' 00 bar 

arv 

Maximal Flow Ramp : 100.00m1/min"2 

*n A uto 

~ 

Pr_ary Chan:_e? 

Compressin i l=`y 33*10w -6/bar 

M_nima'_ Strcke iuto 

~ Store Parameters 

Store Ratio A Y°s 

~ Store Ratio 3 Y_s 

S tore Rat io C 

: 

'Ies 

Stor= Rat_c C '_'as 

Store Flow 

Str= Pre ssUre 

: Yes 

;, 

~ 

Yes 

------------------- 

HP 1100 Autcsampler 

' :n-, ?ct_oT'i 

:nj ect=on Mode Needle 'Aash 

Tnj ector volume : 100 . 0 

100 

~1 

Wash ~lial 

~ 

Au:t=1 i ar'I 

~ Crawspeed 100 μl/min 

S;=ctsUeed 

: 

1000 u_/min 

Draw nositior. 2.0 ~un 

Time 

Stopt;me As Pumt)_ 

Posttime Cff 

~ ---HP - 1100 - Colurz- Thermostat - l -------------------- 

Te~nrerature settinas C 
~:• ~_ ~ _ . , :PC-`iEM\3\ME=HCDS\:?FY-NEAT.M of 12/29/97 5.03.16 rM 

Left temperature 30.0°C 

~ Right temperature : Same as left 

Enable analysis When Temp. is within setpoint +%- 0.8°C 

.Store lert temperature : No 

~ Store right temperature: No 

Time 

Stoptime As pump 

Posttime Off 

Column Switchins Valve Column 1 

i 

~ 

I 

9 C - 33 /~ 
\rFC: F.M'\3\,ME';"1CDS\0398-05A.M 

I -------__- ------------ c= 1ibration Curves 

Afea= Hydrogen Fluoride at exp. RT: 4.208 

ADCI A, Water 430 IC 

, aoo- 5 Correlation: 0.99956 

Residual Std. Dev.: 10.29804 

aoo - For:nula : y= mx + b 

~ : 3 m: 40.75751 

1100- = b: -79.09953 

z°o = 1 x : Amount [ug/ml ] 

y: Area 

0=~ 

0 10 20 

Amountrua/mll 

Area - i3ydrogen Chloride at exp . RT : 5. 2 3 1- 

ioo - , ACCl A, Water 43 0 IC 

Correlation: 0.99954 

1 Res_dual Std. Dev.. 7.33180 

400 - ; Fo rmul a: y= mx + b 

300= 3 m: 53.53597 

'- b: -9.28962 

`0° ~ x : Amount (ug/ml l 

100 = y : Ar=_ a 

0: 

0 s 10 

Amountlug/mil 

C 3 ~ ~~ 
~ I 

cc F . , :PC:?EM\s\METHCDS\0398-05A.M 

Calibration Table 

---------------------- 

J Ca__b. Data Mcd_fied 

1 Calculate : 

Based on 

' Rel : Re=erence r1i ndow : 

?.bs Rer=rence Wi ndcw 

Rel . Non- rer . 'rlindow 

Abs. Non-re=. Window 

f ':ncalibraced Peaks 

? 

: 

art_al Caiibrat_on 

Correct A11 Ret. Times. 

Curve ''ype 

Cr=cin 

weiaht 

Recalibration Settings: 

Avzrage Response 

Averaae Re:_r_tion Time: 

Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

External Standard 

Peak Area 

5.000 a 

0.000 min 

15.000 a 

0.000 min 

not. reported 

Yes, identified peaks are recalibrated 

No, only for identified peaks 

Linear 

igr:ored 

Ecual 

Average all calibrations 

Averace all calibrations 

Caiibrat=on Renort Cotions : 

Printout of reca_ibrations w=thin a seauence: 

Calibracion Tab1e after Recalibration 

Normal Report after Recalibration 

IF th e secruence is dor_e with bracketina: 

Resul ~ s or iirst cycle (ending previous bracket) 

S i gnal i: ADC1 A, Wat=r 430 IC 

RetTime Lvl Amount Area Amt/Ar=a ReL Grn Name 

(rnin] Sig (ug/m1J - 

I---1--1--------------- 

4.208 

------- ~ -- ~ -- ~ ---------- 

1 1 4.92100 

---------- 

128.22501 

I ---------- 

3.83778e-2 ??ydrogen Fluor_de 

2 9.23700 294.02745 3.14154e-2 

3 12.84000 430.76395 2.98075e-2 

 4 15.96000 580.25609 2.75051a-2 

5 24.41000 916.98201 2.66199e-2 

5.231 1 1 1.94300 94.02741 2.06642e-2 Hydrogen Chlor'-de 

2 3.64800 192.18530 1.89817e-2 

3 6.76200 342.32288 1.97533e-2 

4 9.45100 500.26447 1.88920e-2 

5 11.39000 601.82468 1.89258e-2 

Peak Sum Table 

' ***No Entries in table*** 

' 

~ 

- - - --- 

C - 34 
F_=e c:\HPCHEM\3\,DP.TA\1998DA'~'A\MAR 98\0398-05A\001-0101.D 

I_^_ .jection Date 12-Mar-98, 17:05:32 Seq. Line i 

Sample Name : Std 1 Vial : 1 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

ncq. Method : HFQ-1ST.M 

Analysis Method : F: \HPC_-iEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 3GH 

Analysis oi anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr. 

ADC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\001-0101.0) 

uS 

3 ? 

~ U 

aQr~ y 

_ ~ 

. O ~ 

/ 

0 

n N 

N 

OO — 

s0 — 

20 — 

[tTr 

0 E 4 ,iiG 

External Star_dard Re-corSor_ed 3y S 4 crr.a_ 

Ca=_b. Data Mod=y_ed F=iday, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 AIM 

Mult 4 plier 1.0000 

Di1ut'ion 1.0000 

Signal 1. ADCI A, 'nlater 430 ]'C 

Rei:':'i me 

[min] 

4 .170 

5 .221 

Totals 

Result 

TYPe Area 

[uS*s] 

~ ------ ~ ---------- 

BB 133.71863 

BB 93.13246 

s obtained with en 

AmL; ."-krea 

~ ---------- 

3.90489e-2 

2.05422e-2 

hanced inte, 

*** End of 

Amcunt Grp Name 

[ug/ml] 

~ ---------- 1--1----------------- 

5.22157 Hydrogen F=::c=?:e 

1.91315 Hydrogen Chloride 

7.13471 

3rator! 

Renort *** 

C-36 ~/ 
a ci_:= E:\7 =CHEM`,3\DATA\1.998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\001-0201.D JtQ _ 

------------------ 

Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 17:12:04 Seq. Line : 2 

~ ampie Name : Std 1 Vial : 1 

.cq. Operator BGH Inj 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

~ ast changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM b_v 5GH 

Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr. 

a0C I A, 'rVater 430 IC ;0398-+75A\001-0201.01 

us d 4 

7 

UFo 

CY 

L 

~ 

U 

L 

7 

~ 

? 

— 

~ 

.4 .V 

~ 

0 1 2 3 d 5 'nirt 

External Standard Remort 

Scrted Bv Signal 

;:alib. Data Mod=_ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 ~~I 

Mult=plier 1.0000 

Di tion 1.0000 

Si-gnal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

ZetTi:ne Type Area P,mt/Area Amount Grp Name 

(mi.r.] [uS*s] (ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.175 BB 142.74135 3.81315e-2 5.44294 Hydrogen 

5.227 BP 94.02020 2.05246e-2 1.92973 Hydrogen Chior:de 

Totals : 7.37267 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 37 ~~ 
~ :a =_? -~ - . ~?C::EM\3\ ,Di`.Ti\1998DAi'A` C~L~tZ_98\0398-05a\012-2301.D 

=:.jection Dace 12-Mar-98, 20:28:31 Seq Line 23 

Sample Name : Std 1 Vial : 12 

'Lcq . Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

3cq . Method : H. Q-SAIME . M 

:?r.alys_s Method : F : \HPCHEM\3\MET;iODS\0398-05A.M 

rast chanced : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Ar:alysis of anions Ion bv Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADCt A. vVater a30 ]C (0398-OSAt012-2301.D 

us ~ (U 

I u'. U 

_ c 

v a 

- o 

y 

~ 

~ 30 - 

Q LO 

60 - 

40 - 

20 - 

0- 

0 1 i 3 4 5 min 

External Standard Recort 

SCYt.ed 3y SigI1a1 

Ca1_b. Data Modi=iea Frida.r, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

mu , tipli e1- 1 .0000 

3 -.;iucicn 1.0000 

Sigr.al 1. ALCI A, Wat_r 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Gr p Name 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- ~ ------ ~ ---------- 1--I------------------ 

4.238 BB 

I ---------- I 

110.05740 4.21692e-2 

---------- 

4.64103 Hydrogen 

5.236 3B 91.43774 2.05767e-2 1.88149 Hydrogen Chioride 

' Tocals : 6.52252 

Results obtai ned with er_hanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 38 94~ 
:a File F:\HPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MA.R_98\0398-OSA\012-2401.D Std _ 

-------------------- 

Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 20:35:03 Seq. Line : 24 

, ample Name : Std 1 Vial : 12 

.Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 9:51:31 AM by BGH 

Analvsis of ar.ions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A1012-2401.0) 

uS V 

~ o 

L+- U 

c ~ 

80 — ;Area: 95.7645 

— ea:125.08~,~ 

_ ~ 

N N 

00 — 

I 40- 

20 — 

O _ 

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 mirt 

Extzrnal Standard Report 

Sorced By Signal 

Calib. Data Modifiea Friday, March 13, 1998 9:50:07 AM 

' MultiDlier 1.0000 

Dilut -Lon 1.0000 

~ Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area Amt/.;:rea Amount Grp Name . 

[min.] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I---------- ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.248 MM 125.08370 3.90776e-2 4.88797 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.238 MM 95.76450 1.99022e-2 1.90592 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals : 6.79389 

. tesults obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C-39 
_~ e . . \: =C ~?E ~ I\3\DA^_'A\_?98D ~ TA',Y?~_ 9 8 ,C398-.C3..,CG2-0301.D 

Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 17:18:36 Seq. Line : 3 

Sample Name : Std 2 Vial : 2 

.cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

.Sequence Fi1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENC'-T\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-SA,ME.M 

Ar.alysis Mechod : F:\HPCFEM\3\ME7:CDS\0398-05A.M 

Last chanced : 3/13,/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

ynalys'_s of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADCt A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A1002-0301.0) 

uS 

c 

/ 

> 

O 

>. 30 - 

N 

Q LrN 

I 

30 - 

4Q - 

20 - 

0- 

0 1 2 3 4 - rin 

Ext_rnal Standard Report 

Scrted By Sigr.al 

Cal_b. Data Modified Frtday, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 AM 

'Au1 r i Cller 1.0000 

-

i'_u--' on 1.0000 

S_anal 1: ~DC1 A, Water 430 -TC 

RecTi:ne Type Area Amt/Ar_a Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

---- -I------I----------I I ---------- 1--1 ----- ------- 

4.218 BB 282.03073 3.14166e-2 8.86046 Hydrogen Fl::or:de 

5.273 BB 174.56081 1.96731e-2 3.43415 Hydrogen Ch1--=icie 

! T--tals : 12.29461 

.tesults obtair_ed with enhanced integrator! 

----------------------- 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 40 

.-.F 1 
1Da::a File F:\HPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\002-0401.D J Q 

I Injection Date : 

— --------------------------------------- 

12-Mar-98, 17:27:51 Seq. Line : 4 

Sample Name : Std 2 Vial : 2 

acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 1 Sequence File : 

Aca. Method : 

F:\HPCHEM\3\Sc,QUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

HFQ-NEXT.M 

Asialysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

~ Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\002-0401.0) 

1 uS 

_ 

~ 

c 

U 

' L 

a, 

i 

i 

~ 

:V 

N 

20 — 

i a 

i 0— 

0 1 2 3 4 5 -nin 

External Standard Report 

Sorted By Signal 

Calib. Data Modified Fri-day, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilution 

~ : 

1.0000 

Sigr_al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

~ Ret'Time Type Area Amt/Arsa Amount Grp Name 

~ ------- [min] 

4.217 BB 

-- 

279.71878 

--------- [uS*s] 

3.14735e-2 

---------- [ug/m1) 

8.80373 

------- 

Hydrogen Fluoride 

------------------ 

5.273 BB 177.74675 1.96553e-2 3.49366 Hydrogen Chloride 

~ Totals : 12.29739 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

~ 

_________________ *** End of Report *** 

C - 41 

~ ' 
a:a Fi=e ~ : , ,H?C ~:E,M\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\013-2501.D 3 ~ ~ 

Inject=on Date 12-Mar-98, 20:41:34 Seq Line 25 

~ ample Name Std 2 Vial 13 

-~ cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Ana'_ysis Method : F:\HPCaEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

A*:alvsis of ar_ions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ACC1 A, 'A/ater 430 IC (0398-05A\013-2501.0) 

'iS 

'l U 

c 

n 

v a - ~.. 

Ln 

0 ! 2 3 4 5 mirrt I =---------------------------------------------_______________________ Externa'_ Star_dard Report 

~ 

So=_ed 3y Signal 

Calib. Data Modified F=iday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

`^.ultiplier 1.0000 

Dilution 1.0000 

J 

Signal 1: ADC1 

i 

A, Water 430 IC 

I Rec.Time Type Area Amt/Area Amour.t Grp Name 

[minl [uS*s] 

-- ~ - ----- ~ ---------- 

[ug/ml] 

----------1--1 ---- 

4.246 BB 

I 

308.31213 

---------- 

3.08301e-2 9.50528 Hydrogen Fluo=-":-= 

5.282 BB 210.12138 1.95048e-2 4.09839 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals : 13.60367 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 42 /~, 
?i_e _ . , :PC: E. ~i`,3\DA T~.'~ 199 ~3DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\013-2601.D JC : _ 

---------------- 

Tnjection Date : 12-Mar-98, 20:48:06 Seq. Line : 26 Sam>e Name : Std 2 Vial : 13 

~ cq

_ ✓ '_

Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Secuence File : F:\HPCHENI\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

Analv_sis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M 

r.ast char_ged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Ar.alysis of ar_ions Ion b_v Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\013-2601.0) 

uS ~ _ g ~ 

U- U 

. c 

_ Ol Q y ~ 

G 

~ 80 — = > 

y ~ 

N 

I J`'' 0 — 

''+0 — 

0— 

.3 1 2 3 a 5 ?11ri 

~ External Standard Report =====__________________ _ 

' Sorr-*ad By Signa'_ 

Ca?ib. Data Mod'_fied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 :UM 

Mu'_tiplier 1.0000 

1 Dilu= on 1.0000 

S -Lgna'_ 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetT=me Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[minJ [uS*s] [ug/m11 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.246 33 306.04816 3.08766e-2 9.44973 Hydrogen F?uoride 

5.282 BB 206.31227 1.95201e-2 4.02723 Hvdrogen Chlor'lde 

Totals : 13.47697 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 43 

• ~ __.. , „c , 
_a F;1e F: ' ~ HPCF?EM\3\DA'?A\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\003-0501.Z) S ~: d 3 

In ~ ection Date 12-Mar-98, 17:34:21 Seq. Line 5 

'ample Name : Std 3 Vial : 3 

:-=. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sectuence Z- i1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Ar_alysis Mechod : F:\HPC;EM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Last chancJed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Ar.alysis oz anions Ior. by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr. 

AOC1 A. 'Nater 430 IC !,0398-0SA ~003 0501.D) 

uS 

2 — U. U 

o n 

30 — ! i ~ 

• i ~ ' . 

N (n 

60 — 

20 — 

0— 

1 2 3 4 5 T71R 

External Standard Reoort ' 

~ Sorted By Sigr_al 

Cal'-b. Data Modified Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Mu'-tiolier 1.0000 

~ Dilut'_on 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Wacer 430 iC 

~ RetTi;ne 'I`yDe Ar=a Amt%Area Amount Grp Name 

[ min] [uS * s ] [ug/ml ] 

~ -- --- i------ i---------- i---------- i---------- i-- ~ ------------------ 

4.264 BB 417.59354 2.91828e-2 12.18654 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.329 BB 310.52176 1.92378e-2 5.97377 Hydroge_^_ Cr.loride 

~ Totals : 18.16031 

Results obtained with er.hanced integrator! 

~ _------------------------------------------__________________________ *** End of Report *** 

/~~- 
~a~ a File F:"\HPCHEM\3\DATA\i998DATA\iMAR_98\0398-05A\003-0601.D Std 

:njectior. Date 12-Mar-98, 17:40:54 Seq Line 6 

Sample Name : Std 3 Vial : 3 

?_cq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Secuence Fi1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Metnod : HFQ-NEXT.M 

=_nalysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\ME'I'HODS\0398-05A.M 

~ asc changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM bv BGH 

Aralysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr. 

ADC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-05A\003-0601.0) 

_ a ? o — 

~ L 

? 

30 — 

40_ 

~ 

~ = 

20 — 

~ . : 

, . 

~ 0— 

Q uO 

0 mirt 

Lxternal Standard Report 

So=zed 3v Sianal 

Calib. Data Modi`ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AIM 

Mu_=io1i er 1.0000 

D -_u 4 n 1.0000 

Sigr.al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

Re t''I'ime T`ype Area Amt /Area Amount Grp Name 

[m=n] [uS*s] [ua/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- ( ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.265 BB 412.98615 2.92346e-2 12.07350 Hydrogen F'-uor'-de 

5.330 BP 308.27881 1.92419e-2 5.93187 Hydrogen Chlor_de 

Totals . 18.00537 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

- ------------- 

*** End of Report *** 

~~ ~ 
998DA= ~ \NL~_98\0398-OSA',01-1-3701.D 

--------------- 

7 njection Date : 12-Mar-98, 20:54:36 Seq. Line : 27 

Sample Name : Std 3 Vial : 14 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

?.cq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

Ana'_ys'_s Method F:\riPCHEM\3\METt:ODS\0398-05a.M 

Last cnanged : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

.:~nalvsis of anions Ion bv Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADC1 A, Wacer 430 IC (0398-05A\014-2701.0) 

us 

j J 

'1 d 

30 = ;/ _T `~ .• i. 

~ 

50 — ~ 

- ~ 

ZO - 

0— 

0 1 2 3 a 5 nin 

External Standa=d Report 

Sorted 3v Signal 

Calib. Data Modified Fr=day, 

`^.ultipli=r 1.0000 

Diiut'ion 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.268 BB 444.94696 2.88971e-2 12.85767 Hydrogen Flucride 

5.344 BB 369.83966 1.91482e-2 7.08177 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals : 19.93943 

Results obtained with erhanced intearator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 46 /G~ 
~ ::a=a c__e F:\ :PC'-iEM\3\DA'~ A\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\014-2801.D 

In;acLion Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:01:05 Seq. 

-- - 

Line 

----------- 

: 28 

Samole Name : Std 3 Vial : 14 

Acq_ Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

Ar_alysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

LasL changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Ar_alysis of anions Ion by ~+~ aters 430 IC - 2RP-x100 150x4.1 coiumn 

AOC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-0SA',014-2801.0) 

uS ~ a 

o ~ 

- c y ~ 

30 - ~T L 

N ~ c`7 

~ Q fl 

. ' 

40 — 

20 - 

0- 

4 'nin 

--------- ---------- 

Exterza'_ Standard Report 

Jorr?d By Signal 

Ca'ib. Data Modi ~ ied Fridav, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

yu'_:iplier 1.0000 

D1'-u orl 1.0000 

S:cna'_ 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetT; ~ne Tvpe Area Amt/Area Amounc. Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] (ug/ml] 

-- -I------I----------I----------I----------1--1 ------- 

4.267 BV 447.52917 2.88719e-2 12.92102 riydrogen Fluoride '

5.343 VB 380.65131 1.91349e-2 7.28372 Hydrogen Chloride 

~ Totals : 20.20474 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 1 = - -------------------------- -- 

- - - - - - 

-- - - - - - ------- --------------- - - - 

*** End of 

- 

Report *** 

, C-47 
I 

:a ~:a F 4 1e ?: \\ HPCHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAt298\0398 - 05A\004-0701.D 

injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 17:47:27 Seq. Line : 7 

Sample Name : Std 4 vial : 4 

:~ cq: Cperator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequer_ce File : r^:\HPCHEM\3\SEQL'ENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

Acq. Method : HaQ-SAME.M 

?~r_alys_s Methcd : F: \HPCHEM\3\ME''H ODS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

3na'-_ysis or ar_icns Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 iC (0398-OSA\004-0701.0) 

uS a °? _ ~ o 

~

Ut 

c•, c . 

y ' 

% — — 

40— 

20 — 

1 °_ 0 

External Standard Report 

SorteC 3y Sr.c,- nal 

Ca'_-b. Data Modified F=iday, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 AN? 

multiolier 1.0000 

2=1u on 1.0000 

:-"igna'_ 1. ~ DC1 A, Wacer 430 IC 

RetTime 'I','rpe Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] (uS*s] (ug/ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1 -- 1 ------------------ 

4.299 BB 594.00116 2.78026e-2 16.51476 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.377 BB 495.39807 1.90293e-2 9.42708 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals 25.94184 

Results obcained with enhanced intzgrator! 

--------------------- 

*** Lnd of Report *** 

~ 

I 

j 

Std 

mir 

r -se 
C::EM\•3\DATA\1998DATA\M~R_78\0398-05A\004-0801.D 

1_^. ' jection Date 12-Mar-98, 17:53:58 Seq. Line 8 

Samnle Name : Std 4 Vial : 4 

"cq_ Operator BGH Inj ~ 

:ecruence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

:2.cc. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

ana'-v_sis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

Lasc changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 ~LM bv BGH 

Anal_vs-4 s of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 columr_ 

A0C1 A, Wa[er 4.30 iC (0398-OSA\004-0801.0) us ~ a ~ - 

_ ~ ~'• ^' 

y 

30 - - ~'' i = 

' N 

/ C yn 

60 - ~ 

~ , r _ I 

40 - 

?0 - 

0- 

0 1 2 3 4 5 mirt 

' -------------- -------------------------------- --------_-------------------------------------------- -______ _ External Standard Report 

Sor_=_d 31i Signal 

Ca_ib. Data Mcdified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

.'/!u=`.' r)1_er 1.0000 

Di' ut'ior. 1.0000 

S_gna' ]. . ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

i Rec^_'ime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*sJ [ug/m1J 

-- -- - ~ ------ ~ ---------- ~ ---------- ~ ---------- ~ -- 1 ------------------ 1 4.297 BB 605.48212 2.77406e-2 16.79645 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.374 BB 499.13284 1.90267e-2 9.49684 Hydrogen Ch':,==de 

Tocals : 26.29329 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

-------------------- 

*** End of Recort *** 

C - 49 /7 

. . ...1 . . 'I / I n / n n . n n ~ . .•. r w• rn/-TS 0> r'7A 
3 . ~ _e _ : \HPC;ElvI\3\DaTA\1998DAT:~\^t~~ 98\0398 - 05a`,015-2901. ~ 

--------------- 

Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:07:37 Seq. Line : 29 

Sample Name : Std 4 Vial : 15 

cq. Operator : BGh Inj : 1 

,~ equence File : F:\ riPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S -

Acq . Me thod : HFQ - S;uME . M 

%nalysi s Method : F: \HPC??EM\3\MET::ODS\0398-05A. M 

7 ast changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM bv BGH 

analysis oz anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PkP-x100 150x4.1 column 

ADC1 A. Water 430 IC (0398-OSA\015-2901.0) 

uS 

zs ° 

_ ~a•, - v 

~ 

3O — ~ 

~ 

N 

Q ~ 

o'O — 

20 — 

0— 

O E 4 

External Standar3 Report 

Sor-=d By Signal 

Calib. Data Modifiecl Fri.day, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 A1M 

Mu_t_olier 1.0000 

nilut' ion - 1.0000 

~z;gr,al 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime Type Area amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

(min] (uS*s] (ug/ml] 

---- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1---------------- - - 

4.291 BV 558.72919 2.80088e-2 15.64935 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.388 VB 505.04385 1.90226e-2 9.60725 Hydrogen Chloride 

Totals 25.25660 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End of Report *** 

C - 50 /CJ' 
;aca -'4'ile : :\N_CHEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\M-AR_98\0398-05A\015-3001.D S .- ,. 

Injection Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:14:08 Seq. Line : 30 

Sample Name : Std 4 Vial : 15 

kcq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

Analysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHCDS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

Analysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

AOC1 A. 'Nater 430 iC (0398-05A1015-3001.0) 

us 

- ~ a 

_~. 

Q L 

30 — 

v P'.il 

60 — 

40 — 

20 - 

0— 

0 1 2 3 4 5 mirr 

External Standard Reioort 

~ Sorted By Signal 

Ca1ib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Multiplier 1.0000 

~ Diluc'ion 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Wacer 430 IC 

~ RetTime Type Area Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] (uS*s] (ug; ml] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1---------------- - - 

~ 4.291 BV 562.81189 2.79836e-2 15.74952 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.388 VB 501.48309 1.90250e-2 9.54074 Hydrogen Chloride 

I

Totals : 25.29026 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

--------------- 

*** End oz Report *** 

~ ~ ,1 A~~~ 
--~ - --a - . ~ :Fr :EM`,3\D ~?TA'•,1998DATA\ ~~~R_98\0398-05 ~1\005-0901.D 

Injection Date 12-Mar-98, 18:00:30 SeQ_ Line 

~ Sample Name : Std 5 Vial 

Acq. ODerator BGH Inj 

Seque*:ce Fi1e : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

~ Acq. Method : HFQ-SAME.M 

1 nalys:s Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METLGDS\0398-05A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 :0:29:59 AiM by BGH 

I

Ana?ysis o= anions T_on by Waters 430 IC - PRP-xI00 150x4.1 

9 

: 5 

? 

column 

~"~ 

ACCt A. Water 4.30 IC (0398-0SA',005-0901.0) 

uS 

LL `. 

_ ' c ~ ~ v 

1 30 - ~ ~ 

c 

50 - / 

~ 40 - : 

~ 

20 - 

. 

~ = 

0- - 

1 0 1 2 3 1 5 niR 

External St.ar_dard Reoort 

1 3ortad By _ : Si-r- al 

C. alib Data Modi=ied Fr'_day, March 13, 1998 10•27•32 AM 

Mul - iplier 1.0000 

Di:ut'=on J . 

1.0000 

S -Lgr_al ]. : ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

~ Ret`='ime Type Araa A.mt/Area :zmount Grp Name 

[miz] [uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- I ------ 1--I------------------ 

4.387 BV 

I ---------- 

946.74646 

I ---------- 

2.65853e-2 

I ---------- 

~ 25.16949 Hydrogen Flucride 

5.418 VB 590.85229 1.89727e-2 11.21007 Hydrogzn Chlori:e 

Totals : 30'.37956 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

*** End oi RezJort *** 

, C-52 //L, 
::a_a F:`, -PC:?DM\3'\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\005-1001.D 

----------------------- =njection Date : 12-Mar-98, 18:07:00 Seq. Line : 10 

Sample Name : Std 5 Vial : 5 

Acq. Operator : BGH Inj : 1 

Sequence File : F:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

Acq. Method : HFQ-NEXT.M 

Ar.alysis Mechod : F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-OSA.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by 3GH 

Anal;rsis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 column 

Std 

ADC1 A. INater 430 IC (0398-05A\005-1001.0) 

us 

30 - 

, 

. ••~~ ~ 

0"0 - / 

40 - I 

20 - 

~i 

0- ~ 

~ ~~ % 

Li- V: 

~ c 

a~i 4m , 

M 

Q Ln 

0 1 2 3 4 5 min 

External Standard Report 

S"orted 3y Signa]. 

Ca?ib. Data Modified Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Multiplier 1.0000 

Dilut'ion 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

RetTime ':'ype Ar=a Amt/Area Amount Grp Name 

[min] [uS*s] [ug/mi] 

------- I ------ I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.383 BV 

---------- I ---------- I 

948.08185 2.65824e-2 25.20226 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.414 VB 591.67432 1.89723e-2 11.22542 Hydrogen Chloride 

Tocals : 36.42768 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

+ *** End of Report *** 

C-53 ~// 
'_= F:\aPC ~_M\3\DATA\1998DATA\t~,LA.R_98\0398-OSa\010-3101.D 

~ =:jection Date : 

~ ample Name 

Acq. Operator 1 Seauence File : 

zcg. Method : 

A:alysis Methcd : 1 Lasc changed : 

analysis of anions 

-------------------------------------------------- 

12-Mar-98, 21:20:41 Seq Line 

Std 5 Vial 

BGH Inj 

F:\HPC:iEM\3\SEQliENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-05A.S 

HFQ-SAME.M 

F:\HPCHEM\3\METHODS\0398-05A.M 

3/13/98 10:29:59 AM bv BGH 

Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 

------------------ 

31 

: 16 

1 

column 

AOC1 A, Water 430 IC (0398-05A\016-3101.0) 

1 us 

C 

a~ 

 C 

y 1 

80 - 

$ 7 O1 

O 

so 

ao = 

~ 

20 - 

i 

~ °- - 0 - 1 2 - 3 

Ext=rnal Standard RemorL 

~ Scrted By Signal 

Cal_b. Data Mcdi=ied Fridav, March 13, 1998 10.27.32 ~s^. 

J

mui ==plier : 1.0000 

D_lu Cion 1.0000 

_ Siar.al 1: ADCI A, Water 430 IC 

tec'='ime Type Area Amt/area Amount Grp Name 

(m=n] [uS*s] [ug/mi] 

------- I ------ I ---------- I ---------- I ---------- 1--1------------------ 

4.340 BV 878.91571 2.67435e-2 23.50524 Hydrogen Fluor=de 

5.428 VB 609.87872 1.89635e-2 11.56547 Hydrogen Chlcride 

Tocals : 35.07071 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! 

i *** w-nd of Report *** 
aza F:\HPC?-iEM\3\DATA\1998DATA\MAR_98\0398-05A\016'-3201.D St -; :. 

~ In;zction Date : 12-Mar-98, 21:27:10 Seq. Line 

Samp1e Name : Std 5 Vial 

.Acq. , Operator : BGH Inj 

Secruence File : r^:\HPCHEM\3\SEQUENCE\1998_SEQ\0398-OSA.S 

J Zkca. Mechod : HFQ-NEXT.M 

Ar_alysis Method : F:\HPCHEM\3\METIHODS\0398-O5A.M 

Last changed : 3/13/98 10:29:59 AM by BGH 

~ ynalysis of anions Ion by Waters 430 IC - PRP-x100 150x4.1 

: 32 

: 16 

: 1 

column 

AOC' A. Water 430 IC (0398-OSA1016-3201.0) 

uS _ m ~ •~ 

c ~ 

' 80 

i 

c 

Q ' ! ~ 

40 — 

20 — 

! ~ 

; 

~ . a_ 

~ ~ ' ' 0 1 ? 2 

_ 

3 4 

Exter*ial Standard eport 

! Sor_ed 3y - Signal 

Cal ~ b. Data Modi.ied Friday, March 13, 1998 10:27:32 AM 

Mu'-tiplier 1.0000 

~ Dilutton 1.0000 

Signal 1: ADC1 A, Water 430 IC 

i RetTime Type Area Amt/area Amount Grp Name 

[min] (uS*s] [ug/ml] 

------- 

4.341 BV 

1 -- -I------I----------I----------I----------1--I 

894.18402 2.67058e-2 23.87986 Hydrogen Fluoride 

5.430 VB 614.89337 1.89612e-2 11.65913 Hydrocen Chloride 

I Totals : 35.53899 

Results obtained with enhanced integrator! I =------------ ------------------------------------------------------- 

*** End of Report *** 

, C - ss ~3 
I 

APPENDIX D 

~ PRODUCTION DATA 

' 

I 

I 

I 

I 

i 

D- 1 

MLA i 
'C.' 

. ~ Pine Hal1 Brick 

Rapty To: 

—~ PIN! NAIL dRtCK CO., INC. 

Lindsay Brid4o Road 

Poat 0}6oe Box 838 

fNadieon. North Carolina 27025-0839 

Telephone 910-648-6007 

Fax 910,548-1887 

3-13-98 

Robert F. Callahaa 

Trrigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

6200 Harris Technology Blvd, 

Charlotte, N. C. 28269 

Dear RobeR, 

This letter concerns the produ.ction rates through the kiln at Plant #5 when the stack tests 

were run last week. 

Test 3-3-98 

Brick: Pink Paver 

Fired Weight : 5.03 # / Brick 

Brick per Car: 2430 

Wei& per Car: 6.11 Tons 

Push Rate: 28 Cars / Day 

Hourly Rate: 7.13 Tons / Hr 

Test 3-6-98 

Brick: Red Paver 

F'ired Weight: 5.4 # / Brick 

Brick per Car: 2430 

Weight per Car : 6.56 Tons 

Push Rate: 34 Can / Day 

Hourly Rate: 9.29 Tons / Hr 

~ Sincerely, 

Harold B. Newman 

Manager of Technical Servir,es 

2701 Shorefair Drive, P.O. Box I1044 Wusion-Sa1m NC 27116-1044 Tel. (910)'721-1500 Fax (910) 725-3940 

[DIM 

~ 

//h 
APPENDIX E 

CALIBRATION DATA 

I 

E-1 - 
ISOKINETIC CONSOLE CALIBRATION DATA SHEET 

~ 

~ 

~ 

Client: Pine Hall Brick Co. City, State/Location: Madison, NC-Kiln Exst EHS Div. Project No: 046-97-191 

Date: 03/08/98 ` Baro. Press., in. Hg: 28.729 Calibrator Initials: RSC 

Console #: 300.035 Dry Gas Meter No.: 9395 Wet Test Meter No.: 600.002 

Initial Settin s, Volumes and Tem eratures 

Time 

0 

minutes 

Yi 

Isokinetic Console Wet Test Meter 

Orifice 

Meter, 0 H 

in. H20 

Dry Gas Meter Vacuum, Volume and Temperature Meter 

Volume 

(Vw) ft' 

Meter 

Temp. 

(tw) °F' 

Vacuum 

In. Hg 

Volume 

(Vd) ft3 

Inlet 

°F 

Outlet 

°F 

Average 

(td) °F 

1.44 6.0 10.10 80.5 73.5 77.0 10.0 71.8 14.80 0.996 

1.44 6.0 10.09 84.5 75.5 80.0 10.0 71.8 14.75 1.003 

1.44 6.0 10.13 87.0 77.5 82.3 10.0 72.0 14.80 1.002 

y = 1.00 

Example Calculation: 

Vw Pb (td + 460) 

Vd (Pb + (OH/13.6))(tw + 460) 

Where: 

Vw = Gas volume of wet test meter, cubic feet 

Vd = Gas volume of dry gas meter, cubic feet 

tw = Temperature of wet test meter, degrees Fahrenheit 

td = Average temperature of dry gas meter, degrees Fahrenheit 

OH = Pressure differential across oriSce meter, inches water 

yi = Ratio of accuracy of wet test meter to dry gas meter for each replicate 

'y = Average ratio of accuracy of wet test meter to dry gas meter for all replicates; 

tolerance = pretest y t 0.05 y 

Pb = Barometric pressure, inches mercury 

A= Time of calibration run, minutes 

g:\046\excel\metercal\metercal.xls 

Revised 02/13/98 

E-2 1i ~ FP7A7 r, 
PRETEST - POSTEST CALIBRATION DATA FOR,ti1 

ClientZ, n e. 1•~a~~ ~cz, C-t— 

Pretest Date Calibrator 

:eference Thermometer 100.022 

City/State ,tJG 

Postest Date 3 ~i

Lib Calibrator G 

Reference Barometer 600.003 

Pretest Postest_ . 

Temperature, °F' Rer. Tem .°F Tem ratn °F Ref: Tem _°F 

Ome a Red Team DB/WB #100.025 ~ Ome a Green Team DB/WB #100.031 

Ome a Blue Team DB ##100.017 - 

Ome a Gold Team DB/WB #100.032 

Ome a Grev Team DB #100.033 

Ome a CEM DB/WB #100.026 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.035 -- 4r, Z Z 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.045 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.067 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.100 - 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.200 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300 .214 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.241 

Drv Gas Meter IilletJOutiet #300.248 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300. 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300. 

Umbilical Ada tor # 1 #300. C (•i 7 

•Jmbilical Ada tor # i #300. 7,1 to 400 

Umbilical Ada tor # 1'?-#300. LI? 6 i.11, 

Umbilical Ada tor # #300. 

Umbilical Ada tor # #300. 

Umbilical Ada tor # #300. 

Probe #200. S 1,6 

Probe #200. CProbe #200. a a 4 l 

Probe #200. 

Probe #200. 

Probe #200. 

Pitot #200. O V7 LA L 

Pitot #200. 

.. 

Fieid Baro ' m: H Ref. Baro ie. H' > Field Baro irr: fi Ref' Barv in. H 

Barometer Red Team #600.001 

Barometer Green Team #600.014 

Barometer Blue Team #600.010 2,9 ZO i-7 t`I a z. io 

Barometer Gold Team #600.021 D 

'3arometer CEM #600.020(D) 

Were all postest calibrations within the specified EPA Quality Assurance criteria? ;d Yes o No 

E-3 

//f , 

I 

I 

11 
Stationary Source Sampling Report 

Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 4 

ICiln Stack 

Madison, North Carolina 

Trigon Project # 046-95-104 

June 1995 

J / ~~ 
STATIONARY SOURCE SAMPLING REPORT 

FOR 

PINE I3A.LL BRICK COMPANY 

PLANT NO. 4 

MADISON, NORTH CAROLINA 

Kiln Stack 

Performed by: 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Air Monitoring Division 

1920 Starita Road, Suite J 

Charlotte, North Carolina 28206 

704/598-1049 

Trigon Project # 046-95-104 

June 1995 

/Oz!~ WT-IN111i 
REPORT CERTIFICATION 

The sampling and analyses performed for this report were carried out under my supervision 

and/or direction. 

Date --F"A e- ZZ . ~ ~ ~ Signature 

Tom E. Wynn 

Project Manager 

Air Monitoring Division 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

I have reviewed all testing details and results in this report and hereby certify that the test report 

is authentic and accurate. 

Date J~ '''e ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Si gnature ~Ltu~ ~ a~t~w 

Paul R. Jenkins, Jr. 

Quality Assurance Manager 

Air Monitoring Division 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

I have reviewed all testing details and results in this report and hereby certify that the test report 

is authentic and accurate. 

~ 

Date Z 2 ~ Signature 

.~ 

Richard B. McCain, III 

Manager 

Air Monitoring Division 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

ii 

I 

~?"/ %/~ ~S~/~

- -l1w ~ 111 
TABLE OF CONTENTS 

1.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

1.1 Purpose ................................................1 

1.2 Outline of Test Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

1.3 Test Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

2.1 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

Figure 1 - Process Air Flow Schematic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

3.0 SAMPLING METHODS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

3.1 Sampling Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

3.2.1 Hydrogen Fluoride, Particulate Matter 

Sampling and Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

3.2.2 Sampling Ports and Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

Figure 2 - Location of Sampling Ports and Points . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 

3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

4.0 RESULTS ................................... .............9. 

4.1 Sununary of Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

Table 1- Summary of Results, Bricks with 2% Limestone Addition ..... 10 

Table 2 - Summary of Results, Normal Brick Production . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

5.0 APPENDICES .............................................. 12 

A. Summary of Results and Example Calculations 

B. Field Data Sheets 

C. Laboratory Data 

D. Production Data 

E. Calibration Data 

iii 

/,~.~ TR rmcx 
1.0 INTRODUCTION 

This section describes the purpose, a brief outline including the sampling and analytical strategy, and 

the personnel involved in the test program. 

1.1 Purpose 

The purpose of this sampling project was to determine concentrations and emission rates of hydrogen 

fluoride and particulate matter from the kiln stack located at the Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 

4 in Madison, North Carolina. The results of the sampling and the documentation provided in this 

report will be used for air emission inventory and engineering purposes. 

1.2 Outline of Test Program 

Stationary source sampling was perforined June 8 and 9, 1995 by the Air Monitoring Division of 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. at the Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 4 in Madison, North 

Carolina. Six 1-hour sampling runs were conducted on the kiln stack, three with a 2% limestone 

addition to the brick on June 8th and three during normal brick production (without limestone) on June 

9th. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) Methods 1 through 4 and Method 26A 

were used for the determination of hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter concentrations and emission 

rates. All sampling and analytical procedures used were those established by the US EPA in standard 

reference test methods and appropriate state-of-the-art analytical procedures. The test runs were . 

conducted during normal operating conditions. 

1.3 Test Participants 

The project was managed by Mr. Tom E. Wynn, Project Manager, Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

Mr. Wynn may be contacted at 704/598-1049 or by facsimile at 704/598-1050. The test team included 

Messrs. Brian L. Wrenn and James C. Cafferty of Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. Sampling was 

coordinated by W. Vernon Moore, Pine Hall Brick Company, Plant No. 4 Manager and other facility 

personnel. Mr. Moore may be contacted at 910/548-6007. 

~ 

~~~ F7AT111 
2.0 PROCESS DESCRIPTION 

This section contains a brief description of a continuous push tunnel kiln process, the type and 

amount of materials handled, and a typical process air flow schematic. 

2.1 Discussion 

The Pine Hall Brick Company in Madison, North Carolina produces bricks for commercial 

building. In the continuous push tunnel kiln process bricks enter three zones, the exhaust and 

recirculating zone, the firing zone and the cooling zone. The bricks enter the kiln through the 

exhaust and recirculating zone where they are dried at 850°F by recirculated air from the cooling 

zone. They are then pushed into the firing zone and heated to 1970°F. The firing zone is fueled 

by natural gas. Next the bricks are moved into the cooling zone. The heat loss from this zone 

is recycled to the exhaust and recirculating zone to dry the incoming brick. Process gases are 

exhausted to the atmosphere via kiln and stack. Figure 1 details the process air flow schematic. 

Production data during the sampling was compiled by Pine Hall Brick Company personnel. On 

June 8, 1995 bricks with a 2% limestone addition were loaded at 11.9 tons per hour and natural 

gas was consumed at 23,696 cubic feet per hour. On June 9, 1995 bricks without the limestone 

addition were loaded at 11.6 tons per hour and natural gas was consumed at 23,425 cubic feet 

per hour. This documentation is provided in Appendix D. 

2 

/4 V 
Kiln Stack 

Atmosphere 

T 

Stack F Sampling Location 

T 

Kiln 

I 

Figure 1 

Process Air Flow Schematic 

3 

/ ~ ~ ~ 

...........

-

~... 

i 

~ 
3.0 SAMPLIlYG METHODS 

"fhis section describes the sampling strategy, sampling and analytical methods, and quality 

assurance/quality control procedures implemented during this project. 

3.1 Sampling Strategy 

The sampling and analytical procedures used during this test program were those established by 

the US EPA and North Carolina Department of Environment, Health and Natural Resources (NC 

DEHNR). Sampling runs were conducted in triplicate for each process to validate the sampling. 

Tests were conducted during normal operating conditions and were suspended during intermittent 

periods when processes were _not being run. There were no unusual conditions noted during the 

sampling. 

3.2 Sampling and Analytical Procedures 

The US EPA methods used in this sampling program were Method 1 for the location of sampling 

ports and points, and determination of cyclonic flow, Method 2 for the determination of 

volumetric flow rates, Method 3A for the determination of dry molecular weight of the stack gas, 

and Method 4 for the determination of moisture in the stack gas. Method 26A was used to 

determine concentrations and emission rates of hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter. A 

sampling and analysis synopsis is discussed briefly in the following subsection. These test 

methods are available in the Code of Federal Regulations Volume 40, Part 60 or by request from 

Trigon. 

3.2.1 Hydrogen Fluoride, Particulate Matter Sampling and Analysis 

Testing for hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter was performed according to EPA Method 

26A. Gaseous and particulate pollutants were withdrawn isokinetically from the emission source 

and collected in a multicomponent sampling train. In principle, particulate matter includes any 

material that was condensed at or above the filtration temperature of approximately 250 degrees 

Fahrenheit and was collected on a tared quartz glass fiber filter. The gaseous components were 

then bubbled through a measured volume of 0.1N sulfuric acid and 0.1N sodium hydroxide to 

4 

/-~ ~0 F7Ar7 
determine moisture and hydrogen halide content of the emission source. The principal 

components of the sampling system were sequentially: 

* A pyrex glass sample nozzle and probe liner; 

* A heated (248°F ±25°F) probe and filter assembly with tared quartz glass fiber filter; 

* An impinger train consisting of five sequential impingers. Impingers 1 and 2 containing 

100 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute sulfuric acid (O.1N H,SO 4). 

Impingers 3 and 4 containing 100 ml each of an absorbing solution consisting of dilute 

sodium hydroxide (0.1N NaOH) followed by an impinger containing silica gel; and 

* A metering system capable of maintaining an isokinetic sampling rate and accurately 

determining the sample volume according to those specifications in APTD-0581. 

Sample clean up began iinmediately after each test run. Hydrogen fluoride was collected in the 

0.1N sulfuric acid solution in impingers 1 and 2. The liquid in these impingers was measured 

to the nearest milliliter. The collected sample was placed in a polyethylene storage container 

I 

along with the deionized water rinse of impingers 1 and 2 and connecting glassware. The 

container was sealed and the liquid level was marked. The liquid in impingers 3 and 4 was 

measured to the nearest milliliter. The collected sample was placed in a polyethylene storage 

container along with the deionized water rinse of impingers 3 and 4 and connecting glassware. 

' The moisture collected by the silica gel in the fifth impinger was determined to the nearest 0.1 

milligram. All collected condensate measurements were recorded on the moisture determination 

and sample analysis data recovery form. The hydrogen fluoride samples were transported to 

Trigon's Air Quality Laboratory in Charlotte, North Carolina with chain of custody 

documentation. 

~ 

The total fluoride samples and appropriate blank were analyzed by specific ion electrode method 

~ 

by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. personnel. Using a fluoride electrode with a standard 

single junction sleeve type reference electrode and a pH meter the fluoride was determined 

potentiometrically. In a 150 ml beaker 50 ml of sample and 50 ml of a prepared buffer solution 

were combined and stirred continuously. The electrodes were immersed in the mixture and 

remained there until a stable reading in milligrams/liter was determined. The total fluoride was 

calculated and reported in milligrams. 

5 

/ 4 .12 7FAT 
Particulate matter that was collected on the tared quartz glass fiber filter was carefully removed from 

the glass filter support and sealed in a petri dish. The nozzle, probe liner, and front filter-half of 

the filter assembly were rinsed with acetone into a glass storage container which was sealed and the 

liquid level was marked. The sample containers were transported to Trigon's Air Quality Laboratory 

in Charlotte, North Carolina for particulate mass determinations. 

The particulate matter analyses began by transferring the acetone samples to tared beakers. These 

samples were taken to dryness, placed in an oven at 104°C for one hour and then placed in a 

desiccator along with the filters for an initial drying period of 24 hours. The particulate mass was 

determined gravimetrically. The tare weights of the filters and beakers were subtracted from the 

final weights to determine the gross particulate weight. An aliquot of the reagent grade acetone was 

analyzed to determine the blank correction factor. The acetone rinse (corrected for the blank) was 

added to the filter catch to obtain the total particulate weight. The particulate samples and method 

blanks were analyzed by Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. personnel. The laboratory analyses 

and chain of custody documentation can be found in Appendix C. 

3.2.2 Sampling Ports and Points 

The dimensions of the stack and the location of the sampling ports and points are detailed in Figure 

2. Method 1 sampling criteria was maintained. The stack cross section was divided into 24 equal 

areas. The ports were labeled A and B. During the runs each point was sampled for a period of 

2.5 minutes, which yielded a total test time of 60 minutes per run. 

P 

i 
A 

~ 

24' 

100.5' 

Kiln Stack 

~-- <- -~ 

B 

Figure 2 

Location of Sampling Ports and Points 

~ 

/ ~7 ~ -

I 
3.3 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 

Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc., has established quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) 

guidelines for providing the highest quality sampling and analytical data from source tests. These 

QA/QC procedures were implemented to ensure the acceptability and reliability of the data 

generated. 

In summary, a high degree of data quality was maintained throughout this project. All leak checks 

and isokinetic QA criteria were met. Each sampling train was leak checked prior to and 

immediately after sampling. Leak rates for all of the isokinetic sampling trains were less than the 

maximum criterion of 0.02 cubic feet per minute. All sampling rates were also within the 100% 

±10% criterion established for isokinetic sampling. Quality control procedures for hydrogen fluoride 

and particulate matter determinations have included the analysis of a deionized distilled water blank, 

a 0.1N sulfuric acid blank and an acetone rinse blank. The result of the method blank is reported 

in Appendix C with the laboratory data. 

Field data and final laboratory results were entered into Trigon's Air Quality Data System by an 

environmental scientist, independently audited by the Project Manager, and reviewed by the Quality 

Assurance Manager for verification of data. After QC review by the QA Manager, the Division 

Manager verified the final report for completeness and reasonableness of data. The report was 

returned to the Project Manager for review and preparation of the final draft. The report requires 

the signature of the Project Manager, QA Manager, and the Division Manager before release to the 

client. Data and final reports are archived in a secured area for a minunum period of three years. 

Trigon's field and laboratory test equipment has been maintained and calibrated in accordance with 

quality assurance procedures established by the US EPA in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air 

Pollution Measurement Systems: Volume III. Equipment calibrations including pre-test and posttest calibration data are presented in Appendix E. 

8 

0 14 
4.0 RESULTS 

This section presents the mean hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter sampling results. Tabular 

results are also provided to present data from individual sampling runs collected during this project. 

Detailed sampling results and example calculations for the test program can be found in Appendix 

A. Field data sheets and sample recovery documentation are presented in Appendix B. 

4.1 Summary of Results 

Table 1 presents the summary of r 

ultsissionirate 

 drogen fluoride and particulate matter sampling 

with a 2% limestone addition to the J e 8, 1995. The mean hydrogen fluoride 

concentration was 0.042 grains er dry ub' foot (gr/dscf). The mean hydrogen fluoride 

emission rate was 5.39 pounds p hou e mean particulate matter concentration was 

0.004 gr/dscf. The mean particulate was 0.55 lbs/hr. ~ "` - 

~~r ;p YI 

Table 2 presents the summary of results from the hydrogen fluoride and particulate matter sampling 

without a limestone addition to the brick on June 9, 1995. The mean hydrogen fluoride 

concentration was 0.056 gr/dscf. The mean hydrogen fluoride emission rate was 6.83 lbs/hr. The 

mean particulate matter concentration was 0.009 gr/dscf. The mean particulate matter emission rate 

was 1.05 lbs/hr. 

J . CJ '1 ~/%y ✓~ 

4.2 Detailed Stack Sampling Results 

Table 1 presents the data from individual sampling runs at the kiln stack. Included in these tables 

are gas velocity and volumetric flow rates, exhaust gas temperatures, and particulate matter catch, 

concentrations, and emission rates. 

E 

/:~ / 
TABLE 1 

Summary of Results, Particulate Matter Sampling 

Kiln Stack, Bricks with 2% Limestone Addition 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 

Sample Identification 5104-01 5104-02 5104-03 

Run Duration, Minutes 60 60 60 

Sample Time, 24-hour clock 0829-0940 1021-1129 1150-1259 

Percent Isokinetic 104.1 103.2 101.2 

Volume of Gas Sampled, 44.44 38.68 37.34 

dry standard cubic feet*(DSCF) 

Average Stack Temperature, °F 297.4 290.5 288.7 

Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 37.4 32.6 32.1 

Stack Gas Flow Rate, 16271 14277 14064 

dry staadazd cubic feet/minute*(DSCF1Vn 

Stack Gas Flow Rate, 27043 23552 23229 

actual cubic feet/minute(ACFM) 

Hydrogen Fluoride: 

Catch, mg 126.8 104.5 99.6 

Concentration, grains/dscf* 0.044 0.042 0.041 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.13 5.09 4.95 

Particulate Matter: 

Catch, mg 11.6 12.4 9.6 

Concentration, grains/dscf* 0.004 0.005 0.004 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.56 0.60 0.48 

* 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg 

10 

/27. 
TABLE 2 

Summary of Results, Particulate Matter Sampling 

Kiln Stack, Normal Brick Production 

Run Number 4 5 6 A v 9 (q) 5 L 

Date 06/09/95 06/09/95 06/09/95 

Sample Identification 5104-04 5104-05 5104-06 

Run Duration, Minutes 60 60 60 

Sample Time, 24-hour clock 1010-1116 1135-1241 1301-1406 

Percent Isokinetic 101.6 102.1 101.7 

Volume of Gas Sampled, 38.54 38.02 39.31 

dry standard cubic feet*(DSCF) 

Average Stack Temperature, °F 289.1 294.1 292.0 29 l• 7 

Stack Gas Velocity, feet/second 32.9 32.2 33.4 

Stack Gas Flow Rate, 14451 13829 14360 /4) 2~ 3 

dry standard cubic feet/minute*(DSCFM) 

Stack Gas Flow Rate, 23792 23250 24138 23,7Z7 

actual cubic feet/minute(ACFM) 

Hydrogen Fluoride: 

Catch, mg 135.7 142.2 144.2 

Concentration, grains/dscf* 0.054 0.058 0.056 D•O 5~ 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.72 6.83 6.95 9153 

Particulate Matter: 

Catch, mg 22.2 18.9 23.7 

ConcentFation; grains/dscf* 0.009 0.008 0.009 (2,O&g-7 

Emission Rate, lbs/hr 1.10 0.91 1.14 ).05 

* 68°F, 29.92 Inches Hg 

iz'~ ~ 
5.0 APPENDICES 

This section contains detailed supportive documentation that encompasses all aspects of the emission 

test program. Its contents serve as the foundation for the test report. The emission test report 

presents a summary of the information gathered during the sampling activities. The information 

contained in the appendices is necessary to facilitate the review of the emission test report and 

determine whether proper procedures were used to accomplish the test plan objectives. 

Defensible data and the subsequent pollutant concentrations and emission rates is one of the primary 

objectives of any emission test program. To this end, all results, example calculations, field data 

sheets, sample recovery, laboratory results, chain of custody documentation, and equipment 

calibrations have been provided to support these objectives. 

12 

r~. 

i3'/ 
APPENDIX A 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS AND EXAMPLE CALCULATIONS 

A-1 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

Run Number 1 2 3 

Date: 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 

TT Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

PB Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.16 29.12 28.95 

SP Static Pressure, in. Hg 0.018 0.018 0.018 

PS Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.178 29.138 28.968 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 46.71 41.66 40.97 

DH Avg. Delta H, in. H20 2.0 1.6 1.5 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 83.7 95.9 102.8 

VSTD Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 44.44 38.68 37.34 

VW Volume of Water Collected, ml 122.7 107.0 101.3 

VMV Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 5.78 5.04 4.77 

Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.115 0.115 0.113 

PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 11.5 11.5 11.3 

MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.885 0.885 0.887 

P02 Percent Oxygen, Dry 15.7 15.4 15.3 

PCO2 Percent Carbon Dioadde, Dry 1.0 1.0 1.0 

PCO Percent Carbon Monoadde, Dry 0.0 0.0 0.0 

MD Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/Ib mole 28.788 28.776 28.772 

MW Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 27.547 27.534 27.552 

CP Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 

DPS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.54 0.47 0.46 

TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 297.4 290.5 288.7 

VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 37.4 32.6 32.1 

AS Area Stack, ft2 12.05 12.05 12.05 

. 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

QS Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 16271 14277 14064 

QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 27043 23552 23229 

QSW Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 18385 16136 15860 

DN Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 0.311 0.311 

AN Area of Nozzle, ft2 0.00053 0.00053 0.00053 

PERI Percent Isokinetic 104.1 103.2 101.2 

Hydrogen Fluoride Analysis 

FMF Hydrogen Fluoride Analysis 126.8 104.5 99.6 

CAN Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.044 0.042 0.041 

CAT Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.026 0.025 0.025 

CAW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.13 5.09 4.95 

Particulate Matter Analysis 

FMF Particulate Matter Catch, mg 11.6 12.4 9.6 

CAN Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/dscf 0.004 0.005 0.004 

CAT Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/acf 0.002 0.003 0.002 

CAW Particulate Matter Emission Rate, lbs/hr 0.56 0.60 0.48 

/-27 
SUIvIMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

Example Calculations Run 1 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

PS=PB+SP= 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

17.647* VM* (PB+DH/13.6) 

VSTD = 

TM + 460 

Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 

VMV = 0.04709 * VW = 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

VMV 

Bws = ---- ---- -- _ 

VSTD + VMV 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

100 * VMV 

PMV = ---- ------ ---- _ 

VSTD + VMV 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

100 - PMV ' 

MFD = ---- _ 

100 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

MD = 0.44 * %CO2 + 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO2 - %02) _ 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, Ib/Ib mole 

MW=MD*(1-Bws)+18.0*Bws= 

Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

(TS + 460) 

VS = 85.49 * CP * DPS * SQRT 

(PS * MV) 

29.178 

44.44 

5.78 

0.115 

11.5 

0.885 

28.788 

27.547 

37.4 

A-4 / 3r 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 

1058.82* VS * AS * PS * (1 - Bws) 

QS = 

TS + 460 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

QA=VS*AS*60= 

Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

QSW = QS * [1/(1-Bws)] _ 

Area of Nozzle, ft2 

AN = ((DN / 2) ^ 2 * 3.14159)/144 = 

Percent Isokinetic 

0.0945 * (TS + 460) * VSTD 

PERI = 

TT*VS*PS*(1-Bws)*AN 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CAN = 0.0154 * FMF / VSTD = 

Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CAW = 0.00857 * CAN * QS = 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

16271 

27043 

18385 

104.1 

0.044 

6.13 

f ? ci 
m 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

Run Number 4 5 6 

Date: 06/09/95 06/09/95 06/09/95 

TT Net Time of Test, minutes 60 60 60 

PB Barometric Pressure, in. Hg 29.38 29.24 28.94 

SP Static Pressure, in. Hg 0.018 0.018 0.018 

PS Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 29.398 29.258 28.958 

VM Actual Meter Volume Sampled, cu. ft. 41.05 41.33 43.25 

DH Avg. Delta H, in. H20 1.5 1.6 1.7 

TM Avg. Gas Meter Temp., Deg. F 94.4 103.3 104.4 

VSTD Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 38.54 38.02 39.31 

VW Volume of Water Collected, ml 114.8 122.1 118.8 

VMV Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 5.40 5.75 5.59 

Bws Moisture Content of Gas Stream 0.123 0.131 0.125 

PMV Percent Moisture in Stack 12.3 13.1 12.5 17,6 6 

MFD Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 0.877 0.869 0.875 5 

P02 Percent Oxygen, Dry 15.4 15.5 15.7 1 5• 0 

PCO2 Percent Carbon Dioadde, Dry 1.0 1.0 1.0 

PCO Percent Carbon Monoxide, Dry 0.0 0.0 0.0 

MD Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/Ib mole 28.776 28.780 28.788 

MW Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 27.451 27.364 27.445 

CP Pitot Tube Constant 0.84 0.84 0.84 

DPS Avg. Sqrt. Delta P, in. H20 0.48 0.46 0.48 

TS Avg. Stack Temp., Deg. F 289.1 294.1 292.0 Z9i7 

VS Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 32.9 32.2 33.4 

AS Area Stack, ft2 12.05 12.05 12.05 ,j 

A-6 A/01 
~ 

SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

QS Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 14451 13829 14360 

QA Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 23792 23250 24138 

QSW Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 16477 15919 16403 

DN Sample Nozzle Diameter, inches 0.311 0.315 0.315 

AN Area of Nozzle, ft2 0.00053 0.00054 0.00054 

PERI Percent Isokinetic 101.6 102.1 101.7 

Hydrogen Fluoride Analysis 

F1VIF Hydrogen Fluoride Catch, mg 135.7 142.2 144.2 

CAN Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 0.054 0.058 0.056 

CAT Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/acf 0.033 0.034 0.034 

CAW Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 6.72 6.83 6.95 

Particulate Matter Analysis 

FMF Particulate Matter Catch, mg 22.2 18.9 23.7 

CAN Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/dscf 0.009 0.008 0.009 

CAT Particulate Matter Concentration, gr/acf 0.005 0.005 0.006 

CAW Particulate Matter Emission Rate, lbs/hr 1.10 0.91 1.14 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Determination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

Example Calculations Run 1 

Stack Pressure, Absolute, in. Hg 

PS=PB+SP= 

Volume Sampled at Stand. Cond., cu. ft. 

17.647* VM * (PB + DH / 13.6) 

VSTD = 

TM + 460 

Volume of Water Vapor at Std. Cond., SCF 

VMV = 0.04709 * VW = 

Moisture Content of Gas Stream 

VMV 

: 

VSTD + VMV 

Percent Moisture in Stack 

100 * VMV 

PMV = 

VSTD + VMV 

Mole Fraction of Dry Gas 

100 - PMV 

29.398 

38.54 

5.40 

0.123 

12.3 

0.877 

ii`~ 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Dry Basis, lb/lb mole 

MD = 0.44 * %CO2 + 0.32 * %02 + 0.28 * (100 - %CO2 - %02) _ 

Mole. Wt. Stack Gas, Wet Basis, lb/lb mole 

MW=MD*(1-Bws)+18.0*Bws= 

Avg. Stack Velocity, ft/sec 

(TS + 460) 

VS = 85.49 * CP * DPS * SQRT -_ 

(PS * MV) 

28.776 

27.451 

32.9 
SUMMARY OF RESULTS 

EPA METHOD 26A 

Deterniination of Hydrogen Halide and Halogen Emissions 

Pine Hall Brick Company 

Madison, North Carolina 

Kiln Stack 

Gas Volume Flow, Dry Std. Cond. CFM 

1058.82 * VS * AS * PS * (1 - Bws) 

QS = 14451 

i—t- UZI 

Actual Gas Volume Flow, CFM 

QA=VS*AS*60= 

Gas Volume Flow, Wet Std. Cond., CFM 

QSW = QS * [1/(1-Bws)] = 

Area of Nozrle, ft2 

AN = ((DN / 2) ^ 2 * 3.14159)/144 = 

Percent Isokinetic 

0.0945 * (TS + 460) * VSTD 

PERI = ------ _ 

TT*VS*PS*(1-Bws)*AN 

Hydrogen Fluoride Concentration, gr/dscf 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CAN = 0.0154 * FMF / VSTD = 

Hydrogen Fluoride Emission Rate, lbs/hr 

(At Standard Conditions) 

CAW=0.00857*CAN*QS= 

Standard Conditions 68 Deg. F, 29.92 in. Hg 

23792 

16477 

101.6 

0.054 

6.72 

~ 

EZ'MN ! 

„i ~ 
APPENDIX B 

FIELD DATA SHEETS 

~ 

-

R_i ~i _/l1 'TF~ i 
i 6 1 8 I !0 !2 

I 6.7 4.4 1 3.2 16 2.1 

: 35.0 14.8 10.5 8.3 1 6.7 

3 73.0 19.6 19.4 14.6 I 11.5 

a 93.3 70.4 SZ.i =6 ~ 17.7 

S SS.i 67.7 34.3 23.o 

6 95.6 90.6 63.8 35.6 

7 99.5 77.4 61.4 

8 96.8 83.4 75.0 

9 91.8 823 

10 97.4 88.2 

11 93.3 

12 97.9 

t/oeauM of Trawaa hlrs ia Raeanplar Sedu 

3 ♦ 1 9 i 7 9 N ll l2 

t :J.O t6.7 tZ1 10.0 d.7 7.1 6,3 1.6 5.0 43 4.2 

1 75.0 50.0 37.3 30.0 J.0 1.1.4 18.8 16.7 13.0 U.6 123 

3 83J 62.J J00 41.7 33.7 313 27.3 1 15.0 =1 20.8 

+ 873 7ao 511.3 50.0 43.8 38.9 35.0 31.3 29.2 

J 90.0 75.0 6" 363 30.0 13.0 ~09 373 

6 9t.7 78.6 68.8 61.1 51.0 30.0 +3.8 

7 

a 

929 au 

93.8 1803.3 

7L2 

1 

65.0 

73.0 

59.1 

6LZ 

J4.2 

62J 

~ 94.4 1 113.0 1 77.3 1 70.8 

J 

Il 

93.0 Qd i 

9JS 

79.2 

17.5 

12 95.8 

170% A Vik 

Paint : 

Ya 

9k a[';: ... 

stadc.l>3; 

. Shdc 

ID 

Diatanoi i;rom 

Llatdr Wa1L 

Mpple 

[;enSth 

Dlatano From 

` Ouraid* o( Port 

! r , vc, ~ i. oC 

F

1 

 s ~S 

-7 

11 -75 

~ ; 

1 r,t,' 11 2 7 3C -1 

2 5, 

43• w 

~ 

~~~

~ ~~t~.~v~ ~ 

• 

• 

, / --If 77i I 

EPA Method 1 

Determination of Sampling Ports and Points 

Client 2-- ( 111, 1 ? .' ~ ! Ciry/State _t'c<< <wv., k1 

Sampling L,ocation Date 1.: 1l/, 

Sampiing Location Dimensions: 

From Far Wall to Outside of Port 

Nipple i.ength 

Depth of Duct 

Width (Rectangular Duct) ~l~t 

Equivalent Diameter Calculation (DE): 

2 s LenBth x Widtb 2( -)( - ) DE_ .__--._----_ ..--- = -------------------------- = nl tL 

Lsnsth + Width ( _ + - ) 

Distance From Ports to Nearest Flow Disturbance: 

Upstream Downstream 

Dimensions in Inches 6w Z4 ` ► GO ;" 

Duct Diameters 34-5,r-6. ~-1 2.1 14 

Stack Area. in Square Feet 1 ti•t75 

Calculations By aL+J 

~-•• U ' ---~ 

~ 

`,. 

~ c.. • 

I i 

~ 

Sclltmatic of SamplinB Locatioa 

l.oeatlon of Tra.ersa Poina In Greular Staeks 
N 

Q 

= n 

--4 

g cl) , D 

. m ~ 

; m 

I ~ ~ 

~ C 

G 

~ 2 

C1~ 

~ 

m ~ 

D 

3 ~ 

T ~ Q 

O 

3 ~ 

~ 

r 

Q 

~ 

Q 

Cn ~ 

C 

~ 

Q 

> 

Z. 

n 

~ 

Q 

N7 

~ D 

Z 

rTi 

m 

r 

7.1 

CA 

O Q 

~ GJt 

N 

O 

N 

1b 

~ 

N 

t77 

~ 

2 

CC 

~ 

~ 

7 

~ 

Q' 

~ 

N 

O 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

3 

~Q 

C 

~ 

~ 

~ 

N 

p 

Q. 

C 

n 

N 

~ 

1 

~ 

^ = r 

~ n 

C 

C 

c~ 

~ 

Q 

D 

3 

m 

~ m 

O Q 

C/7 

C 7 

CI! -i 

~ 

m 

> 

3 

O 

~ 3 

Qt 

< 

Q 

~ 

~ 

C 

~ 

Q 

D 

~ _ 

N ~ 

~ * 

Q 

N7 

D 

Z 

~ 

T 

D 

— 

MINIMUM NUMBER aF TRAVERSE POINTS 

`+ 

o r 

~ ~ 7 

0 

o a 

n 

3 

r A 

~ p 

n p 7 

~ yr 

r A 

~ 

~ 

g g, 

y 

~ 

~ 

~ 

y 

C 

A W 

~ o 

C 

~ >• 

> ~ 

X 

• ' ~ 

~ 

rm

~ 

~ 

II 

A 

'~ 

a J C ~ 

O 

O 

j fZ 

~ Tl 

~ 

~ 

~ 

V 

O 

aa 

~ p 3 

IV ~ 

~ ta 

I * I 

~ 

O 

IV 

Cr+ 

~~~ ~ 
EP.A .tilethod 2 

Determination of Stack Gas Velocity, Volumetric Flo w Rate and Cvclonic Flo w 

Client '~'~..- ~ ~~~ ~ ' ~. , , 'i 

Sampling Location y ' . ~ ~: r. ~- 

Run Date 1, / .sf ' - i - 

Barometric Pressure. in. Hg 20+ 

Stacic Pressure, in. H,0 4- c. zs 

Pitot Tube [.D. No. ' r'/ %. W': 

Date Calibrated 

Stack Dimensions. in., diameter/side 1 

~ + 

Ciry/Srzm 

Operators 

TimeC' '< 

Stack Pressure, in. Hg Z` i. I z y 

Static Pressure. in. Hg ^ Cl X 

Pitot Tube Coefficient. C. !` sf 

Leak Check. in H ;0 <0.1 ®4.1 

Side 3. in. k/,L 

Field Data 

Trarerss 

Pbint 

Vumber 

Velocitf Hmd 0p Incha 

H2O 

Staek 

Temperature'l► 

Cyeloele FTov Detamiaadwt 

6p; at 01ReLetmte Ang1e Whkh Ykida a`iull Ap 

► 0. u. ,. s ~ 2. u, v C. ~ U 

~ v71 0.01 C G r S 

~ 41 o. o. 01- 0• c1 7 lc 

0. ' Zel 7 Z L 

< C, Z 0.'4 SSc L5F 

C. p. S Z9 0 ~ 0' 

O 

~ C, '4- zsZ U. 09 

5 Cl. 7 R G 

IL G.Z C;, •3z .29d 0 b.c,c I'7 d 

+~ O•14 0.25 1-5 17 25T 0-L! m 0. UZ 

+ 2 U. 1-4 G• zS LS zq U. 0 L G. 0 Z 

A.entta. f: • ? q ~~ I~ ,r 7 

U~

i 

~ ~" Snck Temperature. Dry, aF (A) ~ 2 3S Stack Tempecaaue, Wec °F (B) 

Difference (A - B) Percent Moismre '1 

I comments 

gjn!. ,_ -'Cl 
G7 _c 

J 

~ 

U 

c 

~ 

~ 

a~ ` 

a~ 

~~ 

walsAS iodeA ja1aM - jry u/ ainisioyv % , 

~ ~ ~ Q t'1 • N ~ O 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

/ 

~ 

e 

o ~ 

/ 

N ' j s6aJ69(7 `(nn1 - pl) 

n 

,a Q, 

... 

o 

N 0 / ~ ~ ~ 

o 

rn Ln 

/ 

a 

/ 

/ 

U = a c 

/ •~ ~ 

~ o 

~h'sa •~ y 

~ 

ti°

' 

. 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

~ 

m o ~ 

~ e ~ eb .0

-~ o Co+ c 

r, 

j saaj6ao Mi `ainlajaduwal qln8 1aM 

, c1,~ • ' , ' 
EPA Method 3A - Molecular Weight Determination - Data Analysis 

Client Name 

City/State 

Sampling Location ~'- 

Sample Type 0, Bag ti1 Multipoint o Single Point 

Analyzer Type Serial #1%- - . i- f s 

Project Number 

Sample Datef: 

OperatorJ Q. 

Fuel Type4A 

~; 02Calibration 20.9 t 0.1 % 

Sample 

ID Niunber 

Rum 

Number 

Oxygen. 

Analyzer 

Fyrite:: 

Analyzer F. 

% a_: % COZ 

ti~.~ -,; ~ ! S. ~ , v N ~ 

<► rc:_c;,~ ^ r~~ r ~ ~A 

t 

Note: Calculate the F obefore evacuating any bag samples. Compare the F oto the expected fuel 

values. If a discrepancy exists, reanalyze the sample. The F ocalculation is as follows: 

20.9% - %0, 

Fo = _ --- 

% CO3 

Discrepancies or comments should be noted below: F. Ran es For Common Fuels 

Anthracite Coal and Lianite 1.016 - 1.130 

Bicuminous Coal 1.083 - 1.230 

Disdllate Oil 1.260 - 1.413 

Residual Oil 1.210 - 1.370 

Wood 1.000 - 1.120 

Wood Bark 1.003 - 1.130 

Narural Gas 1.600 - 1.836 

Pro ane 1.434 - 1.586 

Butane 1.405 - 1.553 

F7-A& 7 
EPA Method 3A - Molecular Weight Determination - Data Analysis 

Client Name 

City/State l~' ~ : •<,:. i ~~ 

Sampling Location 

Sample Type ©; Bag ar Multipoint a Single Point 

Analyzer Type,1-;- f ' ~> Serial #.Z!.; % 7-1 ? 

Project Number 1-4i. 11-4 

Sample Date 

Operator_ I f 

Fuel Type INA 

0 OZCalibration 20.9 t 0.1 % 

Sample 

ID Number 

Run, 

Number. 

Oxygea.: 

Analyzer 

Fyrite. 

. Analyzer.. FQ 

% OZ %. G02 

r ~ 

'71 ( , a • 

4 lJ.h 

Note: Calculate the ,Fobefore evacuating any bag samples. Compare the F, to the expected fuel 

values. If a discrepancy exists, reanalyze the sample. The F ocalculation is as follows: 

20.9% - %OZ 

F, = --- ---- 

% COZ 

Discrepancies or comments should be noted below: F. Ran es For Common Fuels 

Anthracite Coal and Lianite 1.016 - 1.130 

Bituminous Coal 1.083 - 1.230 

Distillate Oil 1.260 - 1.413 

Residual Oil 1.210 - 1.370 

Wood 1.000 - 1.120 

Wood Bark 1.003 - 1.130 

Nacural Gas 1.600 - 1.836 

Pro ane 1.434 - 1.586 

Bucane 1.405 - 1.553 

I 

- 
EPA :Ylethod 26A -ititoisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis 

i 

Clieut vame P'~ ~L, ~ ;•~' ~ Project Number 

~ 

CiryiState r Sample Date 

Sampliag Location r Samples Recovered By 

C1ean-Clp Box vumber 414 Recovery Date i ; !_ % - 

Cliain of Custodv: Date Received c: (, - d) `~ - S•)— Received Bv a«- Locked? ✓ 

Equipment Documentation {i/ T T1 

Run vumber 

Sam le ID vumber 

Sam le Bot Number 

Probe NumbCr C-I.? 

Analysis of Moisture Recovery 

ReaQent Recoverv Container 

Im inoer Absorbitig Solution k/ F ~ ~ "~•:.. : 41 ~•, ti. % r11 .~ ~ ''. J I ! ; ;~~ 

Descriotion of ReaQent r 

Rea¢ent Level Marked? V V ✓ 

Final Volume. ml 

Initial Volume, ml " cc 

Net Condensed Volume. ml 15 

Reaizent Rtcoverv Container # ? ? u 

Im inger Absorbinz Solution ~.~ :•.~ '-f~ -!!u Ne'' -+ C•.I iu ,V, Llu ,• ~ ,. N". 

Descri tion of Rea ent c(• ! C(, . r ~ - - 

Rea ent Levet Marked? ' ✓ ✓ 

Final Volume. ml '°= icc l r c. ~ c : 

Initial Volume, ml 

Net Condensed Volume. ml 

Silica Gel Recoverv Container Z 'a 

Percetit Silica Gel S ent 

Final WeiQht. Q 2 1"' -7 

Initial Wei ht. z Lsv.'r ?c-1.7.0 

Net Absorbed Water. e ` ~ ~' r'_ G % • ' '! '1 

TotalRea2entCollected.Y ° 

Sample Reeovery 

Recoverv Container # ► /7- 3 ~ 

Rinsin Solution i.' ~-C i -, ,_ i` ► rF~ ~• ~ ' 

Sam le Container Sealed? 

Liauid Levei 'Marked? " '- t, ~ ` 

Reagent Blanks 

Absorbinz Rea ent Blank -r ~J N• Rinsin Rea ent Blank 

Absg'cbinLr Blank Identificacion # r:.a -, : -1 Rinsin 131ank Identification # < -

6.•1 

AbsAinz Rea ent Blank :.~ 1kj ^l,- '} Rinsine Reaizent Blank A k nl 

Absoi6in¢ Blank IdentiFcation # Rinsine Blank Identification # - :. ~+ 

A / ) / /~ 

rl II Qi ~ ~r I /I[a l! L1 

7 

1. V ! 

. ..;',. . :: 

: 

Reviewer (ititiaLs T'` ~ 

•; `,-:::..:.:.: . 

A~! 

m 
E'P.-I .tilethod 26,4 -:tiloisture Determination and Sample Recovery - Data Analysis 

. ~ Clieut NameD• ~ L - — Project vumber%'41 ,-<;C r~•~ 

CiryiState Sample Date_ 4 

Sampliug,Location Samples Recovered By ~• :- 

Cleau-Lp Box iNumber Recovery Date 

Chain of Custodv: Date Received OC- SS Received By1-C Locked? ~ 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number ~ ~• 

Samole ID Number < ItA la., 

Samole Box Vumber 10 ~ 

Probe vumber o'" l 7.W 01 4 

Analysis ojiYtoisture Recovery 

Reasent Recoverv Container ~ C= 

Imoinszer Absorbiqz Solutioii r,.t Q :t- <.G,j r.. )J 

Descriotion of ReaQent clrc.r 1.k;,' 

Rea¢ent Level Marked? ✓ ~ 

Final Volume, ml 3CC ~~'► 

Initial Volume, ml 7fic r' 

vet Condensed Volume, 4 7 

Rza ,zenc Recoverv Container 

~ 6 

Im inoer Absorbinz Solution '. I ~l 1~1.•C 116 r r V 

Descriotion of Reastent 

Reaizent Level 'Vfarked'.' ✓ ✓ 

Final Volume. ml ZII ~ ,... 

Initial Volume. ml ~ ' SCU Z ' 

Net Condensed Volume. ml 

Silica Gel Recoverv Container 

Perceeit Silica Gel Soent 

Final WeiQflt. 2 

Initial Wei¢ht. z ~ ix.- ~ u'~ •c. 

vet Absorbed Water. Q +' f+' 

T•otal ReaQent Collected, st ' 

Sample Reeovery 

Recoverv Container $ ~ 

Rinsin¢ Solution 01 I (` 

Samie Container Sealed? 

Liouid Level Marked? 

Reaaent Blanks 

E3 5 *4 — " "' Riasine Blank Identi 

C-1 ^J. N Rinsinz Rea ¢ nt Bla e

lank Identification * 5-1_-4 Riasin¢ Blank Identi # I CP1_4- IL 

eviewer ItiiiiaLs 

QA R_'7 

i 

~ I 

TFU[~OlV 
lsokz'netic Field Data Sizeet - EP.A Method 

C:ier t ~ .~ '- ^ ~'~~'- Run vumber ~ 

CicyrState `,~ ~ ~ ,~ ^1 ^ -- --- - - Date (s 

,, , 

Sampling Location ~ ' ~' ~ Operators 

Amo. Temp ..° F 7 1 _ NOMOGRr1PR SET-UP LEAR CREC%S 

Bar. Press., In. Hg. 14,4 aH ® Y Avg .1 P (; ~c: Pre-TestC_~ i~ ® r<— In. Hg. 

Static Press. , In. H:0 ~ e,=~ Meter Temp. X~ ~ Ref A P C —4. Post-Test 9 5 In. Hg. 

Meter Box No. Stack Temp. Noz. Dia. Desired C~t Pre-Test Pttot <0.1 (2 ~.~-~ In. H,0 

Sample Box No. I Pitot Coeff. Nozzie Diameter r) •)'ri Post-Test Pitot <0.I ® ~9 In. H20 

Probe/Pitot Yo. ?j-•6 C•' Z. `lo Moisture ~ Nozzle No. ~~ ,- OkN Tedlar Bag No. ~ 

Probe Temp. SettingZ~~ _ C Factor I ~~ 3 Orsat System Pr? Bag Leak Check ✓ 

Sample ID No. r Start T'utte C' Q? 7 End Time (: ' Observer Rk. ~ 

Sataple 

Point 

Clbck. 

Tima 

Dr. y. Gas 

Nteter 

Cubic: Feer. 

Pitor 

Aeading 

Q P 

Ia: H.O 

Orifice 

: Setting.at~. 

Inchex FI,O 

Idbai Acaial• 

DrY Gas 

Mecer 

Tetnperature.'F 

Intet Ouder 

Pump 

Yacuuat 

Iaehes 

Ha 

Stack 

Temp• 

•F 

Filter 

Box 

•F 

Imp. 

Temo 

''F' 

~i 1 7' C. Z c~ I. S ~~ .'~C; ~~ 1,.4 C. —"► 3 Z 6.) 

< 4l; 49 o, 1 qL l.S • 1(~ 7~ S J'q ► z i4 ` 3"~ 63 

4~ ~.~' Zq r ('0 

u -7.4 I I > > ~ . tu TT 1 - 5' 

~ )0 ~ ;e' ~- ( ~ . zG Z. Le: I 7 : 1 - (e 

L! L..:5 Z -7 

~ u; SCci C. 53 Z 7c: •'; ''~ 4 z,4y e ~ 

3 ~ 7;; SI I. ~ (c C.' I•yf• I•yC (~ ~l ( L ~~ .? 'S'u "S 

C.L'f 1, ~ T I, S S"1 -1Y /.. 3CC 10 

• . L 1.30 C 

I, 3C q: '1 ti `l . c c zss ~ I 

t: I ~ c• S G. L7 . Z3 1.4c I.S~ y 3G 1.0 28~ zu_ 

~ ?,r S2Z.I ~ C. 7 ZG Z-2c;' G ~ L 7• 

( ~ ~ ?y.,r. 41 .;~ 1.=0 ;. ~~ 1.Z 41 1d'' Sz 

U 0> r r. ~ G 5 SL ~ 2ti~ 2%4? ss 

LS l, '~ l. ~ ; ~I r ~ L (s ~1 '_ri 3- L4G G I 

I.q .~;s y2 

Z.2C ? Z ~ ~ 1 $~ g.; Z e ~ Z G4 

7 7 C,, ~ a• > ~_ ~ ~ 0 ~'r Gl G cs r1 C '

~ l

,, S; -. ~? ~ S"1 2 Z 6- 

G 1Q r! -7 -7 7. fo , 2S1 64 

;-UC;• tC 'L ? 2 yC 9 C, ~G ~ . 2 3 ~,: 44 

z'.S 4 1. L.i , 0 z I 2 , , :! L o J c 7 

li C a + : 14 3 

u (: . _. , -~ L5 ~ • ~,, 

~ A .~~ l.:J ~ S. 'k ' :. (_ _,. V ,• ~ 

~ . 
C 

lsolcinerie Field Data Sheet - EP.-I .tilethod _'-, . ~ 

Clienc ^ 1, ,~ -," Run vurnoer Z 

Ciry/Srace ~ r . . I , .. r ; i Dace ~ ~ ~ l ;•,J 

[ ' Sampling Locacion - G; L , ' Operacors 

Amb. Temp.. °F iVOMOGR.•1P1YSE7TUP LEeLRC1gECXS 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg.= 5 ''- _ oH ® 1;'z ti_ Y Avg A P Pre-Test In. H ~, • 

Sracic Press.. In. H,0 ' ~• ~ 5 Meter Temp. ~~ Ref ~ P ~—t~ C'- ~ Posc-Test In, H ~ • ~ 

Meter Box No. 0C Smek Temp. 3cC.' Noz. Dia. Desired 

r• u . Pre-Tesc Picoc <0.1 ® In. H,0 

Sampie Box Vo. "—' Piioc Coeff. ~ 24 Nozzle Diameter Posc-Test Pitoc <0.1 ® In. H= 0 

Probe/Pitoc No. 1. CC G? I % Moisture , Nozzie No. Tedlar Bag No. z 

Probe Temp. Setting l tiZ C Factor Orsat System S;?Z Bag Leak Check LI-I 

Sample ID No. ti%1 J- c;''>_ Statt T'une I ~`.' f Hnd Time r~~~ Observer U%,_ 

Satapte 

Painc 

Clnck. 

Time 

Dr.y Gas 

Meur 

Cuhic: Feec. 

Pitoc 

Reading 

a P 

Itc: H:O 

Orifcce 

Setdaq. aH 

Iitcbes EI 0 

Cdeat Actuat 

Drq Gat 

Mecer 

Tecaperature.'F 

Cntet Oudet 

Putap 

Vacuum 

Iaches 

Ha 

Stack 

Temp, 

'F 

F4Imr 

Boz 

'1~ 

Iinp. 

Temn 

'F. 

T9 31 SU ZF7- ZZS & 7 

;1 ~ -IQ1 1-3c 

'u`X. j 1 C. t'1 r7- < I• 25 G Y 2 G 7 b 1, 31- 

~ -7, Cz:•&4 :

. I~~ 1 .Ic' i.li 5. ~ 7" 7 2 _; 5r 

~~ ~ C ~ ~ 1 (i• 11 ~ .`iL ~ 4~ y. ~ 24a -7 5 7 

SCZ_, isl ci Zti -7 LUO SZ 

_7 c' S'S" 1 ~ C. :'$ Z.oG ?.c~6 rt[., ciG ~ .O 1s;~ )u4 

~ 1 ~ .< Sir 7 C ~ ? L. ~ — Z•. S y~ a() r,L ~~)t ,~ys ~. 

c ZC1 .► G La? ?y 57 

r• '7< , l3 ~.Ltr ~ .1C ~ oI C4 U 

R SG Z lr (: . ~ ~, 7 lr 2. . ~ S G•c; 1•crt• 

C,L c? c—~ ?s~~ ~ Ji. ( 

0 

~ L.5 5 ~~b. Lk c`. 2,1 

~ r-1 n . i,l - 1 ~ .; l 1 Re~ /i•F ~1 "~ /../'; .^n 7 C. Ct 

t 

~ 

S- l ~7 , L' w 7 ~ ~•I~: '~ .IL !br 

-7 eJ . -3 32 7.;5' 1•3S 

-- 

C;.4 

~ 

3 Z•o Z,uc !oC q< /. ` 'S%. 214 -7 /,j 

2~ -4 

Y I ~ . < S ~ ~, ~% ( ~. I~F ( 9 0 

.19:7 

ct~ r'1 ~• r ~ I, t, I. t: ;~ •, `1-7 (,S 

77 VF ~~ U r.i/~ lC~ 5? S.0 ''; ~~C Gti 

J 

e I A-) 

1 •~`~ 1 ~ ~"?t ' ~ ~~. 

A'k.~;l.~l. ~~ I~,•, ~'-~- 

C* 

l ti%1 w
. 

lsokznetzc Field Data J/reer - EP.A .bletitod ?L:.'% 

~ - ` Clier.c ~ ns_ -n r ~ < Run vumoer ~ 

CiryrStace Date 

Sampling Location I !_7 N Operators 

- ~ a== ~ aa=aaa ~ 3=a=aaa ~ aaa ~ aaasammzaaa ~a=~a3~a~ 33e=a ~ ==a= ~~ aaa =a= ~ 3 ~ =3a ~ = 

,,...o. Temp.. °F ` ,VOMOGRAPR SET-UP LE.•I,R CHECKS 

Bar. Press., In. Hg. ~~ ' ~ OH ® ~ `'~ ~ Y = ~ r_ c Avg ~ P /` '— Z Pre-Tesc [n. H2. 

Stacic Press.. Ia. H2O =ti Meter Temp. Ref a P Posc-Test (2 1. . (n, H,, 

~ 

Meter Box No. ZLr •1:'_ Stack Temp. Noz. Dia. Desired Pre-Test Pitoc <0.1 ® _~J, `i In. H.0 

Sample Box No. Pitoc CoePf. G 0~= Nozzie Diameter Posc-Test Picot <0.1 ® (n. H;0 

Probe/Pitoc No. ?L%' 0?`1 95 Moisture Nozzie No. Z<.:G GfS Tedlar Bag No. I 

Probe Temp. Setting '7 `? C Factor ~•~ ti`' Orsac System Bag Leak Check ~ 

Sampie ID No. Start Time End Time 17 5 ~ Observer 

Dry Gas Pitor Orifice Dry Crds. Puutamp Stack Flter Imp. 

Satnp[e Clock. Meuc Aeading Seaing, oFf Mecec Vacuum. Temp Box Temp 

Potnt Titru Cubia. Feet . ~ P Inches. EI,O Tetaoetantre °F Ituhes °F °F °F 

In: FF,O Ideal Actual Infei Ourlet Hg 

4 I F ~ .ti 3 ls i,''C l. ~ u 5 . ' 4. 

~ Z ' 

~ S`► 1. c'S '_4 I. ~~ . t,< lc:' 2,11 2J4 i S~_ 

/6 i IIC• 

; IG 5 1 ~ ~ ?~. /. ~S 1 ~ ,r• ~ q? Sti ? ~. 

'c~ tF G•c 2c , 6I 

~ ~' ~5~ S5 ~ ;.;!i: I ~ •' I ~5 ~;. ~ ~i ,. , ~~ :?ti I G>;= 

-Y 

.~ 

~ .0 , ~~~ /./.0 I;! , c • 

, 

17C: lsCi 1_ S e z~ I, C 1 ~~ ~ ,=, 9'i i•. ~ 7 i: dS I C ~ 

r 0 ~S` ~ y`i ~ L 

10 

~,. lL ' l,r 61 z -,~• ;~ ~ 7 

: /_. (y ~l~ -7 L: I '_ C F7 

7 

II ~~ . ?. )- C..l ~ ./•5 C i ~ If./. lcx, ~.iJ ?t ! 

t,f 74 1 'i" r<.' /• l 

~

L: 

7 i~ /;~~•`~d '•~ I l , •c '-0 / ~~ Jc'f ~.~ 

~;~; ,~~ 5 1 

, q ~ :.~ ~ ~.+ /: ~ /,.1 /,•.l` 7 ; ~ cti ~Z 

~7 -7 

I

~ a~~ / ~ , ~ -! G ` ' ,, ! ~ !•~ ~ ~ ' !i~ 'f ~ -!i 1 "l ~ -~~~~ ~ 7 

~ - 7 4~ G'~.c'~ ~ ' 3 

i2 ~~~ C:G.S` r. ~ G I,Z'S ,?'~ ~i~ ir.,'_ : ?a: ~..~~ `~, 

~ 

C~- ~ I - ~• rT~ ;i ~ 

-j 

~ h CG Otr 

, 

/ n i 
lsokinenc Field Data Sheet - EP.A .tletnod "1 

--~ - ~ 

Ciienc ~ ' ti- I ' , Run Numbe; " 

CiryiState P/! - Date S' 

% ` ~._ Y 

~ Sampling Location ~ —__ _ - - _ Operswrs QLL, 

nb Temp. °F 17 4~ NOMOGRAPfISET-UP 

Bar. Press.. In. Hg.''%! AH ®` Y ~ , 

Static Press.. In. H:04_., Meter Temp. IT ~ 

Meter Box Yo. CL. Stack Temp. L`iC 

Sample Box No. Pitot Coeff. 

Probe/Pitot No. 2-1Y;. C-- % Moisture ' 

Probe Temp. Seaing Z t: C Factor t~ 

Sample ID No. <1/ =' ' ~ ' ~= Stut Time I ~ ► I: 

LE•1R CHECKS 

Avg .1 P C) L'!, Pre-Test 0 C 1:. ® r"7- In. Hg. 

Ref a P C L k Post-Test -S In. Hg. 

Noz. Dia. Desired ~ -~^'~~: Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 ' rn. H,p 

Nozzle Diameter%' Post-Test Pitot <0.1 In. H;0 

Nozzle No. Tedlar Bag No. _- 

Otsu Systetn Bag Leak Check ✓ 

End I"ime -+4 11 i! _ Observer r 

Satnple: 

Point 

CWck. 

T'une 

Dry Gas 

Meur 

Cubic: Feet 

Pitoc 

Aeading 

Q P 

In: FF.O 

Orifice 

: Setdag. ~ 

Inches. K O 

rdeaf Actoal 

Dry Cras 

Meter 

Temperature. °F 

rhlei Otttfet 

Ptuap 

Vacuum 

Inclies 

He 

Stack 

Temp. 

°F 

Filter 

Box. 

°F 

Imp. 

Temp 

°F 

A i .; . ot ~:. z ~ 1.9r 1,3~ s1 ~~i ~~ ~;~ ?3.

, c -, 

•,. i ,s<' I•SS 83 ?5 q L`l l 

3 <1 . iy. ,5 c. Z ~ r. S~ I.~~. iy y /.,1 

•3 I T~ i zu ; z 

L-IC 

U ~ ~.S ~tr .:c c•', Li 2.4r, Tz \10- G I 1 i1, 

1i, 1•^G '76, ~~ ~5' Tc 41 

yIJ. U G. 4. l. ~ n I'v ~i% ~~I ,. ~ ' 2g 3,-1 4,1 

~ ?.o &w<, 9'1 ~ I I. I-c 1.16 zSa 2S'L Go 

G ZZS 64 -7 5 2 O ZL (.-:< .j< q-1 U 6.2 Iy'l t

-~- Sp 

GI LS ~ z ~ 6.r3 I~T- I, C' 1 16,7— zs& 3cl Gr 

,L i,y~ .~~ r~. ~ ~5 7•c 

/. 3< 1 -7 C1 7 (~ • U 1$C 2~ ! C ~- 

7 2.5 4.54. 35' o,l' ,k. ! tG I„7 92- ..c: '9r zS ► U z 

3' < G 5S. 94 I. Ce !C 5 z.es,+ 

4 . -S' 7.14L ic4 1i 

I Z S (c t: t; 2. ;>> l. 1. s Icr, 

-7 ! C 4td~-(.o.95 c. ~ ~ I. ,,~. ► -r,~ !• 7 ; b ~ .~.tir ~~ ! 

7 I ~ ~ ~..•_ , ; . 2~ I.~ , ,-; ~, 5 ~ ~ ~ z ~F ~;~ (IT_ 

~t G ~c ~. ~ < ; G, ~ ✓ l. C I ' ~ ' ~ cf~ E. 1 °-')`'i ~ 

I S lsr11. 1 s 1 ~ 1. ~G !~~ ri! iti ~ . I ~r~ ?s► G ~ 

I I ZS G k.7 ~ ~ . Z L I.~S ~~ ":~ 4=~ (. I •'•SY ~ ='1 r.-1 

r L 7•t (: L. c L4'i 10 uT 

3v h •r ' -6 5 

u!c G ~~ I y •; ci i 4 

QA 

a~j ~~- 0 (~ - IZ - ~is 

rgd 

B-11 

~ 

- . 

-
lsokfneric Field Dara Sheet - EP.-I .6ferhod z (-, IlClient - ~~ r.~ Run `tun:oer 

Ciry/State r'; . ~ ,~ Date 

Sa^nling Location Operators 

Amb. Temp.. °F t (_ ~ NOMOGRAPH SET-UP LE.•IK CHECXS 

Bar. Press., In. Hg. '-ti '% 4 AH ® I''' :; y a `.< Avg A P G~~ Pre-Test ~ ", i 1 f ® J In. H 4• 

Static Press.. In. H :O f__' = Meter Temp. Ref a P =•=~ ~ Post-Test !._(: 1 C~ `` In. Hg. 

Meter Box No. Stack Temp. "_`ic. Noz. Dia. Desired Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 ® y In. H,0 

Sample Box No. = Pitot Coeif. Nozzle Diameter C Post-Test Pitot <0. I® S.Li In. EI_0 

ProbelPitot No. % Moisture Nozzle No. Tedlar Bag No. / 

Probe Temp. Secting ~% ~ _ C Factor 1,0~ Orsat Systrm -Z7f., %'` Bag Leak Check ✓ 

Sample ID No. < r ca - C 5' Start T-nne r' -~C End Time !.'_ J' I Observer N=. if 

Sample 

Poinc. 

Ctock: 

Time. 

Drg Gas 

Meter 

Cubic: Feer 

Pitoc 

Reading 

a P 

In: ig.0 

Orifice 

Setsing aFl: 

rnches. 9;0 

Ideat Actnal 

Dry Cras 

Meter 

Tetnperaaue °F 

tntet Oucfet 

Pump 

Vacuum: 

Inches 

Ha 

Stack 

Tem_p 

°F 

Filter 

BoFz 

° 

Imp. 

TeFp 

' 

4 r C .7? . ~C~ C I; C S ~ G.s ~ q 1 9(~ r~ . ; z•~ 5 z1.5 ~ ~ 

L C, I?. D S l Olq'I 

14 9&I &. S't o.?') 1 C i q`1 3 L".4 L1 ? 

~c '7; a.5' 

'7 n;t u~ S3 

! i. ~ ~ l,( . r1 ~~ f~ li i I,• I r C ~ `i: !p(i 4.9 L_•i ~ J? 'i ~ 

~ r•~ , v.; ~f ~ C.. :1 i `15 ~ 9~~ I!4 ia . ~ ~ `t i •, ,.i: :Z 

31 d ZQ '/: G.oc l~ ? !cr ,.G ~ti~ ZS1 ,--7 

l~ (C~ ' --~ n LZ I 1. ~ : I,L ~ • 1 6 1Z 

_ ,, ,«; r, ~ ~~~ rl~~- ► r,? lc~~ ~cz S.t ~ ; 77.; 6k 

., ~- ; , r L' ~ 

~ , ~ ,:•r -, ZC ~ ,?;; ~ 7 t C. l~ .'. ~ 

a:. , c,•i- 3C ~ 

J-, ~ 

,. ~ 

S Vhi 24 r 7.1, 77 i ~ v` icc ii.G 2 7uZ ~4 

,. ( 5i. 31 r. 3,, , ,v t.1C 

ti r L 9 9 3.1 / Zc; L.2.v 210 r.1 Icl (.' :o ~ 2 ,9 1 C— 

r_ ~ S ~ 611 3~ 

'703 33 c Z ~ r. ~; ~., rr~ ci ~ 3c~ i~'7 

C -+ :- ~ i•,' I'. C,IC r r 1, U , u 1 r,.G 

4 ' l . ,i~ 

Z,I S. 

=' "1• 23 _ 

14. 

— 

cJ /, ~ i I ~7~ r '2 I/ ~ i. .' ~5 Z~i , ,vti 67 

3L• 

4 ' ',t L• ~ L 

t `i • IL ;; ?c ~ .I ~ 

~ C} ' •

~

' A ~J~ fCC C'(j2 - l2•— iS_ 

J 

~ 

-

I 
Isokinetic Field Data Sheet - EPA .Nethod '! ' 

Client ~' ' " I Run Number ~= 

, 

City/State U' ': c ~ ~ 

 i;- Date 

Sampling Location I: i ~ ''T• - Operators 3-+., ~r ~ 

a s a a s a a a s s a a a a x a s s a a a a s a a s a a a a a s a a s v s a a a a a a s a a a s a s s a a a a a a a a a a a= e 

Amb Tem 012 1' NOMOGRAPH SET-UP . p.. 

Bar. Press., In. Hg. _!'S.` `i _ OH ® '•` 1" ~ Y a 

Static Press., In. H=0 r:._= Meter Temp. '^ 

Meter Box No. ~ t'~ ~+:• ~ Stack Temp. ?+= 

Sample Box No. r_ Pitoc Coeff. 

Probe/Pitot No. 9° Moisture ~ 

Probe Temp. Setting 21 C Factor ' uc 

Sample ID No. Start Time j 3 ~ 

LEAg CHECSS 

AvgOP: ?? Pre-Test-% _ C-® 1! In. Hg. 

Ref G PC•, z 5 ~ Post-TescL c ® In. Hg. 

Noz. Dia. DesiredL i!:r Pre-Test Pitot <0.1 (D In. H,0 

Noule Diametert) . :S!C Post-Test Pitot <0.1 0'1`>' In. H,0 

Nozzle No..100 C``f :' Tedlar Bag No. ~ 

Orsat Systemi,•<. N'^ Bag Leak Check ✓ 

Bnd Time I'= r.a •• Observer !y%.. 

Sampie. 

Point 

Clbck. 

Titnc 

Dry Oas::. 

Meter 

Cubtc. Feec 

-`' 

Pitoc 

Raadmg 

a: P 

Ia. ff.0 

Orifice . 

. Setting• IIff 

Inches H10 

Idesl Actual 

Dcq Crss: 

Meter:. 

Temperantre ~ °F 

InIet Oatler 

Pumg 

Vacttwir. 

Inches 

H 

Stack: 

Temp 

°F 

Filter 

Box 

°F ~ 

_ Iinp.. 

Temp 

°F 

~ ~ i~. i.S C.•l.'- I, ~~ i r:c 90 Y~ ). Z 2t0 C.< 

} i , -► 4 Z '~ Z ~ ~•- ~~ / e z 

t).!c;, f,qc I. ~1 u rJA, ic' S`S 2~ Y 241 

~ ;! ~~ ~) Q. ~ ~.'I~ ~ ~ •i~ ~~'~ ~ S Z1-1 '~~T/ •~l 

-2.cs- 10 rrc 2y~- 25c ~=ti 7 

c -► -, c `•' ,:. -, 1 ~'S 5 ~ t _ 

~ i ' ; ,Z '7 

C.. 

S ~ - ~~ 5s is ~.~_. rv~ ~~. )~° ~.~ Z4 Z!:~q- c.c, 

1-; %>! .__Z ( o 

z. t ~ ~ . ~ s i. r ~.~~ ~ i : re: 

7 ~ Li Z. 

Z 1 ~: ~ 1~ ~ l '~ 1~ ~ • C. ~ I(;.G j' 4 ) C ~ M~ 7~~~ Z~ 1 /. 7 

~ ~~ l :~l • Z•~ C. ; •, ~ .!'i I ~ ~ ,, ic,:- ~,G • ~_S~ ~ci~ , 

f tjc 

x ('`G l ~~ 'CC J ci _ v ~ ~y~► ' 

o:5 7 rcc, 

i•643 e: r~ ~.d~ i u(, 

34 Z .> L Z ~`~i,- r '° ~ ~ /`. ~ L'i3 7 :1 Y 

, -3; i: 7 5 3 

';; 

 ' ~ ~ I ~ 

7 1 2 LI< 

~ 

1%; i3 ~► C~ 

~ 

 ,. u74 r ~~+• ~~ ~•~~', ~ 

a~C~c~ h -~~.~ 0ts - 12 - t)~ 

4 /4-k' F7= 
APPENDIX C 

LABORATORY DATA 
i 

I - 

'TRIGON . 

EPIGIPIEERING COl`lSC1LTAPlTS, II`{C. 

1920 Starita Road, Suite J- Charlotte, N.C. 28206 •(704) 598-1049 

June 13, 1995 

REPORT OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS 

Mr. Vernon Moore 

Pine Hall Brick 

Post Office Box 336 

Madison, North Carolina 37205 

Trigon Project No.: 46-95-104 

Trigon Project Name: Kiln Stack June 1995 

Trigon Sample Number: 5104-01B 5104-02B 5104-033 5104-04B 

Date Collected: 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/08/95 06/09/95 

Description: Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 

0.1N H:SO, O.IN H:SO, 0.1N H,SO, 0.1N H,SO, 

and Rinse and Rinse and Rinse and Rinse 

Inorsanic Analvsis 

Date Analyzed 06/ 13/95 06/ 13/95 06/13/95 06/ 13/95 

EPA Method of Analvsis 340.2 340.3 340.2 340.3 

Units 

Fluoride as F- mgil 251 139 188 263 

I Volume of Solution 1 0.505 0.553 0.530 0.516 

Fluoride as F- mg 126.3 104.5 99.6 135.7 

~ Trigon Sample Number: 5104-05B 5104-06B 5104-07 5104-09 

Date Collected: 06/09/95 06i09/95 06/09/95 06/09/95 

~ Description: Run 5 Run 6 Blank Blank 

O.IN HzSO, 0.1N H,SO, O.IN H,_SO, D1 Water 

and Rinse and Rinse 

~ Inorganic Analvsis 

Date Analyzed 06113/95 06/13/95 06/14/95 06/14/95 

EPA Method of Analvsis 340.2 340.2 340.2 340.2 

Units 

, Fluoride as F- m,/1 260 257 <0.5 <0.5 

Volume of Solution 1 0.547 0.561 0.200 0.200 

Fluoride as F- 

~ 

m; 142.2 144.2 <0.100 <0.100 

Comments: All of the above data has been blank corrected. 

~ ~ ' /7 
Mr. Vernon Moore 

Page 2 

June 13, 1995 

Trigon Project No.: 046-95-104 

Trigon Project Name: Kiln Stack June 1995 

The data contained in this report were obtained using U.S. EPA approved methodologies. These data have been 

reviewed and are approved for release. 

G '' L 

i' 

Paul R. Jenkins, Jr. 

Laboratory Director 

QUALITY ASSURANCE DATA 

Analyses were performed using Orion Model 720A lon Selective Meter, Serial Number 001390 and Fluoride 

potentiometric electrode Mode196-09 BN, Serial Number XZl 01736. Rea;ents used in performing these analyses 

were logoed in the Trigon Laboratory Analysis book as follows: 

Fluoride Standard Number 3173-16 Lot Number S229 1,000 ppm as FFluoride TISAB Number 7-34021 Lot Number 10104MM 

Fluoride Electrode Filling Solution Number 900001 Lot Number ZZl 

The slope for the fluoride electrode was -58.8 millivolts. The acceptable slope for the fluoride electrode must be 

in the range of -54 to -60 millivolts. The following matrix interference checks, calibration performance checks and 

precision checks were performed: 

Trigon Sample Number: QC1-710 5104-03B 5104-04B 

Date Collected: 02/01/95 06/08/95 06/09/95 

Description: Laboratory O.IN H:SO, O.IN H:SO,, 

Control and Rinse and Rinse 

Code 68970 Spike Duplicate 

InorQanic Analvsis 

Date Analyzed 06/12/95 06/13/95 06/13195 

EPA Method of Analysis 340.2 340.2 340.2 

Units 

Fluoride as F- mg/1 4.05 392 263 

Volume of Solution 1 0.100 0.100 0.516 

Fluoride as F- True mg 4.00 388 135.7 

Percent Recovery % 101.3% 101.0% 0.0%RPD 

Sample No. 5I04-03B spiked with 2.0 mg/100 ml of Fluoride as FIt should be noted that all samples were analyzedas a l: 10 dilution due to the high concentration of fluoride present. 

Ii i 
EPA iYlethod 5- Particulate Determination - Data Analysis 

Client Name ~ "•K ~*, I' ~• ~- 

Ciry/State /~'~ • : , 4: ' 

Sampling Location 

Clean-Up Box Number 

Chain of Custody: Date Received 

Project NumberC= =' -- 

Sample Date' Cf;=; 

Samples Recovered By . !Ir 

Recovery Date ; 

Received By Locked? ✓" 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number 

Sam le ID Number <104-0! <" C 4 - 

Sam le Box Number 1 Z. 3 

Probe Number LC= t' ,~ = 

Analysis of Particulate Recovery 

FiIter # til Z« - c i I A? _ C, ' 

Final Wei ht. m 5 5 ~ . ' 3 -z 

ReweiQh. Final Wei ht. MR 35. Z 3 ~ 3• 1 33N • ~I 

Initial Wei¢ht, m¢ "{ =6 1 4 +. 

Rewei¢h. Initial Wei ht. mg 3Z'7. z 

Avera e Final Wei ht. m 33.3 . 14 'L"7 

Averaae Initial Weisht mix 7117 f 311.6 

Net Filter Catch ma 

Beaker # 

Acetone Rinse Level Marked? 

Final WeiQht mz 11c1 ~~ J Z 11 0+4 u3 

Rewei¢h. Final Wei¢ht. mg f1e1 :13• .d 

Initial Weiaht. m 1 ~ `+ ,r 1'.0 !+ ? o=+ ~: .!J ', iJ • ~ 

Rewei¢h. Initial Wei ht mg ;' L 

Avera¢e Final Wei¢ht. m 

AveraQe Initial Wei¢ht. m¢ +' '; S- + L ~ % 

Acetone Blank + . m I. i") -I• ► ~ 

IVet Front Rinse Catch m 

Tocal Particulate Collected: ma 

Gravimetric Documentation 

XX W aal w e t ht Re w e t h ¢ Final w et h t Re w' e t h 

Date of Gravimetric Analvsis c t u 16/ /•'F ` ~ 

Time of Gravimetric Analvsis• )YV, ,.__• 

Relative EIumidirv. Percent ' Y 7 

Blank Acetone Analysis 

Blank Beaker # " Final Wei¢ht m !c. -7. ~ ff . '1 

Beaker Volume. ml ! oc' Rewei¢h. Final Wei ht mg FC- 1, 

Acetone Concentration. Percent •G c c I Initial Wei ht. m G~ '' ~ 

ARalvsr Initials Rewei h Initial Wei ht m ~U~' 3 ~ '. ~ 

Reviewer IRitials Acetone Residue, ma 

1"7AV1 
9 

EPA Method 5- Particulate Determination - Da.ta Analysis 

Client Name ~ •,_ = Project Number ~ -(f. ~~ rc ~ 

Ciry/State Sample Date _ [ ~ c', le".- 

Sampling Locadon Samples Recovered By rli,+.; 

Clean-Up Boz Number Recovery Date C.1-; 

Chain of Custody: Date Received Received By 0'' ; Locked? ✓ ~ 

Equipment Documentation 

Run Number 14 ~ (; 

Sam le ID Number q -% ,J lGU..nC, 

Sam le Box Number t ~ 3 

Probe Number CLL 

Analysis of Particulate Recovery 

Filter fI vi -c ' tiI tl-i -0t, 

Final Wei ht mg Z:-41.S .#ti 

Rewei h Final Wei ht mz 34 R. 1 154 t. 7 zN -1 2 

Initial Wei ht mg t t. l ttt,1 33 I•iJ 

Reweieh. Initial Wei ht. m ' - t 3 ,L Z I. S 

Averaae Final Wei ht. mg VJ L+ t.(, 34 

Avera e Inicial Weight, m "5 3i, I ~ P.L 33t•S 

Net Filter Catch. ma 

Beaker # C -7 F 

Acetone Rinse Levei Marked? ✓ ✓ v 

Final WeiQht m 1c5 Iv, : i ( 5, 6,?L • Z 

Rewei¢h Fnal Wei ht, m !C'' ~,;; "-) 11 S, 6 ' r•4 ll Z. c:z: 4 

Initial Wei ht mg 115 -4 -;. I 

Reweigh Initial Wei ht, m U ~C~ .J.• r t'. t. ( i? ty~ .~ 

Average Final Wei ht. ma '.'.ri ' ! 1';, 11 L, 

Avera¢e Initial Wei ht mg IC 5. 1 1t 5: 

Acetone Blank + m 

Net Front Rinse Catch. m 

Total Particulate Collected m L'— Z -7 

Gravimetric Documentation 

~ i:::<; ~ ri:;:~:::::;::::::i:;::•':•'::<::::::::::::::i: ~ : Iniaal Wei ht Rewei h Final Weiaht Rewei h 

Date of Gravimetric Analvsis 'a :. ICJ"- c,/ . /I 

Time of Gravimetric Analvsis c 3 I 11~ 

Relative Humiditv, Percent i I 

Blank Acetone Analysi,s 

Blank Beaker # I" Final Wei ht miz 1, ?IC - 

Beaker Volume, ml Rewei h Final Wei ht mg 7. _;r ~ ..' 

Acetone Concentradon Percent <^ Initial Wei ht mg Q, 7. ?!l.••+ 

Analvst Initials Rewei h Inicial Wei ht mg Z. Z 

Revfewer Inftials ~ Acetone Residue. m 

enlAl"1 P'_S /, ~ F7i-' V -:-]. 
I]l I~IL 

~--1 ~4 1 1 1 ~ 

~~ ~ 

i11~IVo ~: __ _ 

.1 rl -j 

iy "a 

cr cr 

C2 

u 

1 4 A 4 

9 . ~ 9 

r.s, 
1 / ---~ 
W 

O ~ 

~ 

~ cc 

E ~ 

~ 

zU 

~ 

~ 

y ~ I 

~ 

Ua`a 

V 

.`. 

_ xJ 

^ ~ 

l~ y 

a~ 

o v^° UQ 

~ 

~ 

Qw 

J J J v Q O Q 

~ 

J 

V 

•~ ~_~ = ~ O 

. r.. 

R 

v` 

~ 

L~ 

I 

~ 

"C 

v 

H 

•~ 

~ 

Q •A 

~ 

R 

LL~ 

O 

•~ 

~ 

~. 

O 

~ 

O 

V 

~ .~ 

~ 

.7-1 

1 t100, 4sl~ 

~ 

... 

R 

0 Q 

C EO 

~ 

~ 

~ 

y 

.~ 

Q" 

.~ 

G 

~ 

a 

~ y 

~ N 

a 

l/ / 
APPENDIX D 

PRODUCTION DATA 
- -- - - - ---- -. .. - ------ •- - --.. 

_ . ~ O~Lt l.U-'• ~.eJ . ._.~~./ .~5------... .'~ . _ ._..J ~ ... /-•_~~..~. ----- --- 

.....__.__ .._ ~ - ------ ~ ---- ~ 

----..... . 

... .. -----._. .-------...._. . . ._....----•.- ~ - . . -------- . _._...._ . . -----_.- - ----- -- .. 

----- ----•----.. . -------- ~ --- ~~= ----~-3 ~ y~ .....C.,..~ __._~.r.._ ._._.._.... __. 

~ 

~ 

-- --•----. .. -----.-----.. . .__ . _ _ _ 

~

. - --. .-----._ _. _... . . . .__ . ----- .._-- . .--------_-.-- 

► -- ------- - . _. ._ . ---- ----~-~ ' ~ ~ 

. ~.~.. .S._ . ~ ~- -- h~-~-Q..---... .. ._ .._ _._. 

~ --- -- . ... --------------- . . ------------. - -- 

. . ._. . _ .--•-- ---- . . . ... _ ----- 

~ 

/ /- v' 
APPENDIX E 

CALIBRATION DATA 

1"~T ql 
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION PROCEDURES 

General. Each item of field or laboratory test equipment purchased or fabricated by Trigon 

Engineering Consultants is assigned a unique, permanent identification number. New items 

for which calibration is required are calibrated before initial field use. Equipment whose 

calibration status may change with use or with time is inspected in the field before testing 

begins, and again upon return from each field use. When an item of equipment is found 

to be out of calibration, it is adjusted and recalibrated or retired from. service. A11 

equipment is periodically recalibrated in full, regardless of the outcome of these regular 

inspections. 

Calibrations are conducted in accordance with United States Environmental Protection 

Agency (US EPA) specifications. Trigon follows the calibration procedures outiined in EPA 

Reference Methods found in the Code of Federal Regulations (Volume 40, Part 60) and 

those recommended in the Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement 

Systems: Volume III (EPA/600/R-94/038c). When the Reference Methods do not detail 

procedures, Trigon uses methods such as those prescribed by the American Society for 

Testing and Materials (ASTM). 

Data obtained during calibrations are recorded on standardized forms, which are verified 

for completeness and accuracy by the Quality Assurance Manager. Data reduction and 

subsequent calculations are performed using Trigon's Air Quality Data System. Calibration 

calculations are performed by an environmental scientist, independently audited by the 

Project Manager, and reviewed by the Quality Assurance Manager for verification of data. 

Copies of calibration data are included in each test or project report. 

Inspection and Maintenance. An effective preventative maintenance program is necessary 

to ensure equipment performance quality prior to, during, and followi.ng every test Each 

item of equipment returning from the field is inspected before it is returned to storage. 

During the course of these inspections, items are cleaned, repaired, reconditioned, and 

recalibrated when necessary. 

Each item of equipment transported to the field for a test project is inspected again prior 

to being packed. Trigon performs these quality assurance checks prior to departure for the 

project site to detect equipment problems which may occur during periods of storage. 

Trigon transports adequate back-up equipment to each project so as to avoid any 

unforeseen circumstances. 

Calibrattion. Source sampling equipment that require calibration include nozzles, pitot 

tubes, thermometers, flow meters, dry gas meters, and barometers. The following sections 

detail the calibration procedures followed by Trigon for each item. 

F m 

--- 

P7A7 r 
Nozzles. Each probe nozzle is uniquely and permanently identified at the time of purchase 

or fabrication, and it is calibrated before initial field use and prior to each test The inside 

diameter of the no7.zle is measured to the nearest 0.001 inch using a digital micrometer. 

Five measurements are made using different diameters each time. If the difference between 

the high and the low measurements do not exceed 0.004 inch, the average of the five 

measurements is used. If the difference exceeds this amount, or when the nozzle becomes 

nicked, dented, or corroded, the nozzle is reshaped, sharpened, and recalibrated. 

Regardless of usage, all nozzles are inspected and recalibrated on a yearly basis. 

Pitot Tubes. All Type S pitot tubes are constructed and calibrated in strict accordance with 

the procedures contained in EPA Reference Method 2. A.Type S pitot tube will have a 

coefficient of 0.84 ±0.02. A standard pitot tube will have a coefficient of 0.99. Each pitot 

tube is visually inspected prior to any field use. If the inspection indicates damage, it is 

recalibrated. Regardless of usage, all pitot tubes are inspected and recahbrated on a yearly 

basis. 

Drv Gas Meter and Orifice. Each metering system receives a full calibration at the time 

of purchase and annually, thereafter. Post-test calibrations are performed after each source 

test. If the'calibration factor, y(gamma), deviates by less than five percent from the initial 

value, the test data are acceptable. If y deviates by more than five percent, the meter is 

recalibrated and the meter coefficient (initial or recalibrated) that yields the lowest sample 

volume for the test runs is used. Standard practice at Trigon is to recahbrate the dry gas 

meter anytime y is found to be outside the range of 0.98 < y< 1.02. 

Barometer. Each field barometer is cahbrated to agree within ± 0.1 inches Hg of a 

reference mercury barometer. The barometric pressure is corrected for pressure and 

temperature. Prior to and following each field test the field barometer is verified. 

Thermometers. Each new thermometer, pyrometer and thermocouple purchased or 

fabricated by Trigon is calibrated in strict accordance with US EPA Protocol. Cahbration 

tolerance limits are as follow: 

Impinger Temperature Gauge ± 1°C or 2°F 

Dry Gas Meter Temperature Gauge ±3°C or 5.4°F 

Stack Thermocouples ± 1.5% of absolute temperature 

All thermometers and thermocouples are inspected and calibrated prior to and following 

each field test Regardless of usage, all thermometers and thermocouples are inspected and 

recalibrated on a yearly basis. 

Laboratory Equipment. Trigon Engineering Consultants has a written quality assurance 

document that covers cahbration and maintenance of laboratory equipment This includes 

calibration of each analytical balance against Class S weights. Cahbration of thermometers, 

barometers, and wet test meters are traceable to MST. A copy of our quality assurance 

document may be obtained by written request. 

, -, ,F7A7 
~ ~ 

~ 

~ 

PRETEST - POSTEST CALIBRATION DATA FORM 

Client - H F- 

_ .test Date C.'Co - q'3 Calibrator7f`c 

Reference Thermometer 100.022 

City/State 1rY1 r ~~ 

Postest Date O Calibrator s'C-c 

Reference Barometer 600.003 

Pretest: Postest: 

Temperature, °F ReC Tiinp, °F Tem ratu °F ReF: Tem °F 

Omeoa R DB HH-25 #100.025 

Omeoa R WB HH-25 #100.025 

Ome a B DB HF-I-82 #100.014 '1'4 -14 z 

Omeea B WB HH-82 #100.014 0 14 Z 

Ome a G DB HH-82 #100.001 

Ome a G WB HH-82 #100.001 

Ome a 4 DB HH-25 #100.017 

Ome a 4 WB HH-25 #100.017 

Dry Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.035 

Dry Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.045 

Dry Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.067 7 -1(4 

Dry Gas Meter In1et,/Outlet #300.100 

Dry Gas Meter InledOutlet #300.200 

Drv Gas Meter Inlet/Outlet #300.214 

Umbilical Ada tor #1 #300.030 '7 -14 -7 z -?Z . 

. nbilical Ada tor #2 #300.031 -1 N ? 7 17 -7Z 

,mbilical Adalptor #3 #300.032 Z -tZ 

Umbilical Ada tor #4 #300.042 

Umbilical Ada tor ##5 #300.043 

Umbilical Ada tor #6 #300.044 

Umbilical Ada tor #7 #300.134 

Umbilical Ada tor #8 #300.135 

Umbilical Ada tor #9 #300207 

Umbilical Ada tor #10 #300 . 108 

Umbilical. Ada tor #11 #300.216 

Umbilical Ada tor ##12 #300.217 

Probe #200. 0 2. Z. 

Probe #200. OZ) -71 4 ~ Z 

Probe #200. O H ~ ~? 

Probe #200. 

Probe #200. 

Probe #200. 

Pitot #200. 

Pitot #200. G0 1 

Field Baro in.. A Ref.'Barct, in. Ho FieId Baro W. Hg. Ref. Baro in. H 

Barometer #600.001 

Barometer #600.009 

rometer ##600.010 

Barometer #600.014 S. 77 W. ~ 

Were all postest calibrations within the speci ~ied EPA Quality Assurance criteria? dYes o No 

,~ i 

Fp77r .

-I 
ISOKINETIC CONTROL CONSOLE CALIBRATION FORM 

` Console Number: 300.067 Calibrator: RBM 

~ Calibration Date: 04105195 Dry Gas Meter Number: 839875 

Expirabion Date: 04/05/96 Barometrtric Pressure, in. Hg: 29.380 

Console Gas Yolume Meter Temperatures ' Time Console 

Orifice 

Setting 

Gf-i 

in. H20 

Wet Test 

Meter 

V. 

ft3 

Dry Gas 

Meter 

V¢ 

ft' 

Wet Test 

Meter 

t„ 

°F 

Dry Gas Meter DGM 

Avg. 

td 

°F 

0 

Minutes 

DGM 

Factor 

Y 

Orifice 

Meter 

OH@ 

in. HZO 

iwet 

tdi 

•F 

Outlet 

tao 

•F 

0.50 5 5.01 67.4 . 69.0 66.0 67.5 12.82 0.997 1.870 

1.00 5 5.06 67.4 77.0 68.5 72.8 9.22" 0.996 1.916 

1.50 10 10.12 67.1 83.0 72.0 77.5 15.27 1.004 1.951 

2.00 10 10.23 66.6 90.0 79.5 84.8 13.40 1.006 1.972 

3.00 10 10.25 66.2 92.0 81.5 186.8 10.95 1.006 1.965 

4.00 10 10.27 1 66.1 1 93.0 82.5 87.8 1 9.57 1.004 1.997 

Average 1.00 1.95 

Y aH® 

Tolerances: 1.00 1.84 

±0.02 ±0.15 

Y and AHVare calculated as follows: 

Vw *Pb *(td +460) 

Y = __-__ --------------------- -------------- = 1.00 

Vd * (Pb + AH113.6) * (t,,, + 460) 

0.0317*OH(t„+460)*0 

OH~ = w~~____ __ ~_ . 

* ( 

_ ) Z = 1.95 

Pb * (td + 460) V. 

F7A&V 
C ~ ~ 

~G 

~ — 

H ` 

U ~ 

O ^" 

,. U 

~ 

~, 

_o r~ 

. y 

CD w O 

Ln 

~o 

0 

1 ~ ~ 

~ 

10 z a 

Q y ~ 

41 ti 

Z 

~ F„~U,„ 

060 ~ 

i.. y 

. ~ 

c ~ 

_ g 

w 1.4u

. ~ 

\ y ~ 

~ L ~ 

z 

~ O ~ ~ ~ 

C ~ 

~ ~ — 

~ p a 

L ~ 

~ ~ a 

y 

s - U 

~~ ~ 

:. 

U 00 .. 

Frl 

V 

1~1 

h.r 

~ 

C ' 

Q 

0 .. 

~ 

n r 

1 

1~ 

~ 

O 

V 

U 

z 

~ 

Q 

~. 

~ 

C 

C 

+1 

H 6~ 

6~ 

6. Q 

u 

~ 

U 

C 

R ~. 

C~ 

O 

t/1 

~ 

~ 

~ •~ ti =- 

O C ~.. ~ 

6. ~ 

V 

N ~ 

0 *a 6. 

L - ~, 

o -+ G 

L ~ 

^ 

C 

~ • — 0 ~..+ 

6. ~ 

~+•U+ _ 

y~+ y 

~ 

v~ Q 

~+ 

y y 

... 

Vl 

~++ U 

Q Q'S 

.r U • 

a7 ~• ~ 

Co 

 :: ~, — 3 ~ •- _a 

~ ~ yn • !C ~ ~ .ri 

cc ~ C 

~ S~ w s~ ee Q ~ 

~q i' ~ ~ V • 6r ~ 

> j 0 `CO 

a. cc y y 

U 6. 

> ~. ee > 

~ 

$ ~ ~ 

+ + ♦ 

`o 

.. . . . Q. . [:;' + ♦ ♦ ,=: 

1O 

.~ .~.r~~:::•~.~ :.: ~::::, ~ ..,,: ~ rJ

C;

.

.::::-:•?;::.;.: c~ 

,,~ 

,.. N ;~ 

^ ~•~ N r! 

c7- ~ r 

~ 

:.. 

v 

0 

y 

V 

in 

~

. . . . .... , ~ . ~ 

c• ~,. ~ 

~ rJ 

`~' Lj,. 

~ 

c >• 

~ v 

. 

~ 

412., ~.. ' ~ F .x. ........ .. 

<:;'G.. . C ;- w•:,..:. =;:'7 r ~~' r.+ 

'<'". o .. G7:' . > • ... ~ —~ 

... ~ 

V,~ _Y 

I '?/ L 
C= ^ 

~ 

1 ~ 

r 

\ yV 

~ 

LUr ~ 

~ • R GI~ 

o ~ 

•y ~ N n 

•~ O ~i 

~ O ~O 

• ~" 

C~ 

Q ~ ~ 

Z y _ 

~ 3 " ~ 

OG ~ 

r.~.+ !C 

cc 

~ 

~ ` r 

~ 

0 

a ~ 

~ 

a~ 

V C 

~ o 

r = v 

, O ~ 

~ p ~ 

: .~.. 

— 

~ y 

s U 

~ 

~ C 

u ~ Q % ♦ /1 fA 

V 

F~1 Ir ~ 

Q 

E 

Q 

O_ 

E 

~ 

.~r 

.. ~ 

IA7j 

d 

~ 

O 

~ 

z 

O 

U 

F~ 

Z 

~ 

~ 

1~ 

~ 

N 

C? 

Q 

1 

~ 

N 

C~ 

3~ V 

u 

U 

C 

R r. 

O 

N1 

7.1 

R 

U 

~ y 

~ V ~ 

ti 

~ w 

O w C 

y 

R 

~ op 

V 

Ca _ ~ 

H 0 

N 

Cu 

6) "" y ~+ y v1 Q ifp 'C 

E s E v 

tj

~ ~~ E 

~ s ~ ~ R 3 L 

m ,. .~ 

EE~a~~~~ •='R 

c, tA y R~ o~ o u 

~ 

; 

> 

~I

v 

> ..~ .°4 

~~ 

~: ?• C~ o 

Et4s 

~ 

~ f 

r 

O 

C 

~ 

CT 

~ 

a— 

00 

~- 

~ 

r•~ 

M, 

U 

J 

oc 

O 

~ 

rJ 

~ 

e 

~ 

J 

v 

1 

t~ 

00 

~ 

s 

v 

$ ~ ~ 

♦ ♦ ♦ 

J ~ ~ 

. .. ~ Q . .::. ~ .-.... . : ♦ ♦ . ♦ 

+ 6 6 0 

♦ • , . ~:: .' ..;.,,.. ... ~:~ 

. ~ .... . .. . ~ . ' ~ .. ~ 

v ~ v , ,~ . O 

...; .....: ~~ . .. .::. 

~~

~~ :: ~ •'. ~ ;.;;:.::'::: .,. ~ ;a:, ;: .. ~ . 

V

1 '"~ 

..r 

♦ 

.~r 

♦ 

~.. 

♦ 

;.c. :;;;:,:';;".: ~ • ~ ~. r' ~ 

:.. .:. : 

v 

r,) 

czi 

~ 

V 

C-,J 

Q► ~ ~ 

v p O 

p1m 

. ~ 

.. 

Lv 

r. 

r. 

V . 

~: r! 

'.>'V].. :.'-_ ;: a:'•<;,; .' e. ~' O 

>::~... 

•.~ 

~- 

y 

~.n 

: 

... . 

;. ~ ~.: ",.... •:. ~ . 

, • e;: ~ 

r. ' s 

~ 

~. 
'I'YPE "S" PITOT TUBE CAI,IBRATION FORM 

Date: 01103195 Calibrator. BLS 

Specifications: 

A.) Pftot tube assembIy must be level. 

B.) If pitot tttbe is damaged eaplain uader cottiments section. 

C.) Z= A Sin YL<0.125) and w= A Sin eL<0.03125) 

D.) o: <10° and (3 <5° 

LD. Length al° ar2° O1° 02° Y° , e• A, in. Z, in. W, in. P.4, in. PB, fn. Dt, in. 

Indivfdual Pitot Tubea 

; 200.019 2' 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 1.5 1.0 0.935 0.024 0.01632 0.467 0.468 0.371 

200.049 3' 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.940 0.000 0.00820 0.470 0.470 0.371 

200.002 4' 0.5 2.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.942 0.025 0.00822 0.471 0.471 0.372 

~ 200.02S 4' 1.5 7.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.0 0.981 0.017 0.00000 0.491 0.490 0.375 

200.025'0 5' 1.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.960 0.000 0.01675 0.480 0.480 0.376 

200.003 6' 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 0.949 0.008 0.01656 0.474 0.475 0.374 

~ 200.044 6' 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.955 0.008 0.02500 0.477 0.478 0.375 

200.038 T 0.5 3.5 0.5 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.948 0.025 0.00000 0.474 0.474 0.372 

~ 200.030 S' 0.5 4.0 1.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.965 0.017 0.02526 . 0.483 0.482 0.372 

200.03110' 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.5 1.5 0.926 0.024 0.02424 0.463 0.463 0.373 

300.164 Arid. 3.5 3.0 0.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 1.132 0.030 0.01976 0.566 0.566 0.377 

~ Pitot Tubes Attacited to Probes 

` 200.020 2' 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 1.046 0.009 0.00000 0.523 0.523 0.374 

200.021 2' 0.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 1.066 0.028 0.00930 0.533 0.533 0.376 

( 200.036 2' 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.958 0.025 0.00836 0.479 0.479 0.367 

~ 200.037 2' 0.0 2.5 2.0 4.5 1.5 1.0 0.986 0.026 0.01721 0.493 0.493 0.368 

200.004 3' 1.5 0.0 1.0 1.5 1.0 0.0 0.939 0.016 0.00000 0.470 0.469 0.378 1 200.005 

200.006 

3' 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.944 0.008 0.00000 0.472 0.472 0.378 

3' 1.5 0.5 3.5 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.933 0.041 0.00000 0.467 0.466 0.373 

200.015 3' 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.936 0.016 0.00817 0.468 0.468 0.375 

~ 200.016 3' 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.940 0.000 0.00820 0.470 0.470 0.374 

200.017 3' 0.5 0.5 1.0 0.0 1.5 0.0 0.938 0.025 0.00000 0.469 0.469 0.373 

200.007 5' 1.0 0.0 ZS 2S 1.5 0.0 0.946 0.025 0.00000 0.473 0.473 0.376 

200.008 5' OS 0.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.0 0.950 0.025 0.00000 0.475 0.475 0.375 j 

200.009 5' 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 L5 0.0 0.940 0.025 0.00000 0.470 0.470 0.376 

200.022 S' 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.933 0.024 0.00814 0.466 0.467 0.376 

~ 200.027.5' 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.939 0.000 0.01640 0.469 0.470 0.376 

200.034 5' 20 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.5 0.940 0.033 0.00820 0.470 0.470 0.374 

200.024 0 60 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.5 0.5 0.628 0.016 0.00548 0.314 0.314 0.251 

~ 200.010 T 0.5 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.5 0.5 0.938 0.025 0.00819 0.469 0.469 0.376 

200.011 7' 1.0 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.938 0.008 0.00819 0.469 0.469 0.378 

200.012 T 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.940 0.000 0.00000 0.470 0.470 0.376 

200.039 T 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 1.0 0.936 0.000 0.01634 0.468 0.468 0.374 I 

200.040 T 1.0 0.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 1.5 0.944 0.016 0.02471 0.472 0.472 0.374 

200.041 8' 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 1.0 1.0 0.926 0.016 0.01616 0.463 0.463 0.370 

200.045 8' 0.0 0.0 0.5 LO 1.5 0.0 0.937 0.025 0.00000 0.468 0.469 0.376 

~ 200.01310' 0.0 0.0 20 1.5 0.5 0.0 0.927 0.008 0.00000 0.463 0.464 0.371 

200.01410' 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.946 0.008 0.00000 0.473 0.473 0.373 

Cotnments: Pitot Tubes Required Only itiCnor Maintenance 

• Water Cooled 

" Inconel 

Pitot tubes requiring calibration: None 

300.164 3 Anderson Pitot Tube Euension ~ 

- 
PYREX NOZZLE CALIBRATION DATA 

5/8" SHANK 

Date CaLbrated: 01/03/95 Cahbrated By: JCC 

Nozzie Diameter (a) 

Nozzle Davg(c) D1 D2 D3 D4 DS Diff. 

Number (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (in.) (b) 

5/8" Nozzle 

300.101 0.623 0.623 0.624 0.624 0.622 0.623 0.002 

300.102 0.622 0.622 0.623 0.622 0.622 0.623 0.001 

300.186 0.621 0.621 0.622 0.622 0.621 0.621 0.001 

1/2" Nozzies 

300.103 0.494 0.494 0.495 0.494 0.494 0.494 0.001 

300.104 0.495 0.495 0.494 0.495 0.496 0.495 0.002 

7/16" Nozzles 

300.078 0.430 0.432 0.432 0.429 0.428 0.428 0.004 

300.095 0.436 0.436 0.437 0.436 0.436 0.437 0.001 

300.096 0.433 0.432 0.433 0.433 0.432 0.433 0.001 

318" Nozzles 

300.077 0.377 0.378 0.377 0.377 0.377 0.378 0.001 

300.093 0.379 0.379 0.379 0.380 0.379 0.378 0.002 

300.094 0380 0.381 0.381 0.379 0.379 0380 0.002 

5/16" Noales 

300.088 0.311 0.311 0.312 0.311 0.311 0.312 0.001 

300.089 0.314 0.314 0315 0.314 0.315 0.314 0.001 

300.090 0.315 0.316 0.315 0.315 0.314 0.315 0.002 

300.092 0.310 0309 0.309 0.312 0.310 0.310 0.003 

1/4" Nozzles 

300.075 0.2S4 0.254 0.255 0.254 0254 0.254 0.001 

300.121 0.257 0.257 0.258 0.258 0.257 0.257 0.001 

300.122 0.257 0.256 0.257 0.257 0.258 0257 0.002 

300.091 0.251 0.250 0.251 0.251 0.252 0.251 0.002 

3/16" Nozzies 

300.183 0.190 0.189 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.190 0.001 

300.184 0.191 0.192 0.190 0.192 0.191 0.191 0.002 

300.185 0.191 0.191 0.192 0.191 0.192 0.190 0.002 

1" Nozzies 

300.218 0.998 0.998 0.998 0.997 0.999 0.996 0.003 

300.219 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.999 0.998 0.998 0.001 

wnar 

(a) 01.2.3.a.3 - Ilw diNwnt n=a irai0a dartHtvs. mraura0 to nr~ 0.001 n 

(b) 0 . maornrm difhrnnoa batwaan arty two Clamaars. (in.) 0< 0.004 in. 

(o) Oavp - avarapa d 01. DZ. 00. 04. and 05 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

NIST REFERENCE THERMOMETER TRANSFER CALIBRATION 

Tolerance: +/- 1S% of Absolute Temperature 

Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.290 

Ambient Temperature. Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.023 

Calibrated By: JCC Ref. Thermometer Serial No.: 2890 

NIST Reference Transfer Temperature 

Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Instrument Difference 

ID No. Pofnt Source Temperature Temperature Calculatlon 

Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % 

-30 to 120 Deg. F Thermometer Serial Number 97133 

100.022 1 Water Bath 43 43 0.00 

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 

3 Water Bath 114 113 0.17 

-5 to 400 Deg. C Thermometer Serial Number U38717 

100.024 1 Water Bath 43 6 Deg. C 0.04 

2 Water Bath 69 21 Deg. C -0.15 

3 Water Bath 114 46 Deg. C -0.14 

-320 to 2S00 Deg. F Omega HH82 Pyrometer Serial Number 70JY00149 

100.001 1 Water Bath 43 42 0.20 

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 

3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 

•320 to 2500 Deg. F Omega HH82 Pyrometer Serial Number 72JY0306 

100.010 1 Water Bath 43 43 0.00 

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 

3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 

-120 to 2000 Deg. F Omega HH25 Pyrometer Serial Number T-98180 

100.017 1 Water Bath 43 43 0.00 

2 Water Bath 69 69 0.00 

3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 

-120 to 2000 Deg. F Omega HH25 Pyrometer Serial Number T-124997 

100.025 1 Water Bath 43 42 0.20 

2 Water Bath 69 68 0.19 

3 Water Bath 114 114 0.00 

25 to 1125 Deg. C Thermolyne 1400 Pyrometer Serlal Number 746940350496 

600.015 1 Muffle Furnace 80 Deg. F 27 Deg. C -0.11 

2 Muffle Furnace 96 Deg. F 35 Deg. C 0.18 

3 Muffle Furnace 118 Deg. F 48 Deg. C -0.07 

4 Muffle Furnace 106 Deg. C' 105 Deg. C 0.26 

S Muffle Fttrnace 210 Deg. C' 211 Deg. C -0.21 

6 Muffle Furnace 348 Deg. C• 350 Deg. C -0.32 

•Used 100.024 Thermometer Serial Number U38717 as Reference Thermometer 

Source = Type of calibration system used. 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) 

.. --__----- X 100 = <1S% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 I 

~ I 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

THERMOCOUPLES 

Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature 

Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure. In. Hg: 29.290 

Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.022 

Calibrated By: JCC Reference Thermometer No.: 100.024 

Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

i Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer D(fference 

1D IYo. Polnt Source Temperature Temperature Calculation 

Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % 

~ Omega HH-25 Dry Bulb - Red Teant 

i 100.025 1 Water Bath 53 53 0.00 

2 Water Bath 156 156 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 270 270 0.00 

~ Omega HH-25 Wet Bulb - Red Team 

100.025 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 146 146 0.00 

~ 3 Oil Bath 208 208 0.00 

Omega HH-82 Dry Bulb - Blue Team 

100.014 1 Water Bath 53 53 0.00 

~ 2 Water Bath 156 155 0.16 

3 Oil Bath 270 270 0.00 

Omega HH-82 Wet Bulb - Blue Team 

~ 100.014 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19 

~ 2 Water Bath 146 145 0.17 

3 Oil Bath 208 208 0.00 

Omega HH-82 Dry Bulb - Green Team 

100.001 1 Water Bath 

~ 

53 53 0.00 

2 Water Bath 156 156 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 270 271 -0.14 

` Omega HH-82 Wet Bulb - Green Team 

1 100.001 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 146 146 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 208 207 0.15 

~ Omega HH-25 Dry Bulb 

100.017 1 Water Bath 53 53 0.00 

~ 2 Water Bath 156 155 0.16 

3 Oil Bath 270 270 0.00 

Omega HH-25 Wet Bulb 

r 100.017 1 Water Bath 55 56 -0.19 

I 2 Water Bath 146 146 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 208 208 0.00 

~ Source = Type of calibration system used. 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) 

X 100 = <1S% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

TIMRMOCOUPLES 

Tolerance: +/- 1S% of Absolute Temperature 

Date: 01/03195 

Ambient Temperature. Deg. F: 68 

Calibrated By: JCC 

Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 

Reference Thermometer No.: 

Reference Thermometer No.: 

29.290 

100.022 

100.017 

Reference Bimetalltc Temperature 

Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Thermometer Difference 

ID No. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation 

Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % 

Blmetalltc Wet Bulb 

100.005 1 Water Bath 33 33 0.00 

2 Water Bath 66 65 0.19 

3 Oil Bath 193 194 -0.15 

BlmetallIc Wet Bulb 

100.006 1 Water Bath 33 34 -0.20 

2 Water Bath 66 66 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 193 196 -0.46 

Bimetallic Wet Bulb 

100.019 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20 

2 Water Bath 66 66 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 194 194 0.00 

Bimetalllc Wet Bulb 

100.020 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20 

2 Water Bath 66 65 0.19 

3 Oil Bath 194 194 0.00 

Bimetalllc Wet Bulb 

100.021 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20 

2 Water Bath 66 68 -0.38 

3 Oil Bath 194 195 -0.15 

Source = Type of calibration system used. 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) 

_ X 100 = <1S°lo 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 

I 

,~F7A'V~ 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

' THERMOCOUPLES 

Toleraace: +/- 1.595 of Abaolute Temperature 

~ Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Presaure, Ia. Hg: 

Ambieat Temperature. Deg. F: 68 Refereace Thermometer No.: 1 Calibrated By: JCC Refereace Thermometer No.: 

29,290 

100.022 

100.017 

RefaYace Thermoeouple Temperature 

Thermocouple Refereace Tltermometer Potentiometer Difiereace 

~ m No. Poiat Source Temperature Temperature Calculatton 

Degrees F Degrees F Perceat, 96 

2' P(tot Tube 

200.019 1 Water Bath 68 70 -0.38 I 2 Water Bath 161 161 0.00 

3 Oil Batb 316 317 -0.13 

3' Pitot Tube f 200.049 1 Water Bath 74 74 0.00 

2 Water Bath 154 155 -0.16 

3 Oil Batb 338 334 0.90 

4' Pitot Tube 

~ 200.002 1 Water Batb 62 63 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 159 159 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 304 306 -0.26 

4' Pltot Tube 

200.028 

~ 

1 Water Bsth 62 63 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 154 154 0.00 

3 Oil Batb 311 312 -0.13 

~ 3' P(tot Tube 

200.025 1 Water Bath 62 64 -0.38 

2 Water Bath 161 160 0.16 

3 Oil Bath 321 322 -0.13 

6' Pitot Tube 

~ 

200.003 1 Water Bath 69 70 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 152 153 -0.16 

~ 

6' Pitot Tnbe 

3 Oil Bath 316 321 -0.64 

200.044 1 Water Bath 62 63 -0.19 

~ 2 Water Bath 159 158 0.16 

3 Oil Bath 310 306 0S2 

T Pitot Tube 

200.038 1 Water Bath 62 64 -0.38 

~ 2 Water Bath 159 159 0.00 

3 Oil Bath 317 315 0.26 

8' Pitot Tube 

~ 200.030 1 Water Batb 62 63 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 160 160 0.00 

3 Oil Batb 316 321 -0.64 

10' Pitot Tube 

~ 200.031 1 Water Bath 62 63 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 161 161 0.00 

3 Oil Bat6 341 344 -0.37 

1 Source - Type of calibratioa rystem uaed. 

Tempenture Differeace Calculation: 

~ (Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) 

X 100 - <1596 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 

t 

I 

- 
i 

J 

f TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

THERMOCOLTPLES 

( Tolerance: +/- 1.5 010 of Absolute Temperature 

f Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.290 

Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.022 ( 

Calibrated By: JCC Reference Thermometer No.: 100.017 

Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

Thermocouple Reference 

( 

Thermometer Potentlometer Difference 

ID No. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation 

Degrees F Degrees F Percent, °o 

5' Probe (1) 

200.007 1 Water Bath 69 70 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 147 148 -0.16 

3 Oil Bath 327 333 -0.76 

5' Probe (2) 

200.008 1 Water Bath 68 69 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 150 151 -0.16 

3 Oil Bath 324 328 -0S1 

5' Probe (3) 

200.009 1 Water Bath 69 70 -0.19 

2 Water Bath 145 146 -0.17 

3 Oil Bath 318 322 -0.51 

5' Probe (4) 

200.022 1 Water Bath 69 71 -0.38 

2 Water Bath 153 151 0.33 

3 Oil Bath 338 335 0.38 

5' Probe (5) 

200.027 1 Water Bath 69 71 •0.38 

2 Water Bath 152 150 0.33 

3 Oil Bath 345 336 1.12 

5' Probe (6) 

200.034 1 Water Bath 69 71 -0.38 

2 Water Bath 152 150 0.33 

3 Oil Bath 331 329 0.25 

6' Probe (•) 

200.024 1 Water Bath 68 70 -0.38 

2 Water Bath 153 151 0.33 

3 Oil Bath 381 379 0.24 

4 Muffle Furnace 500 • 500 0.00 

5 Muffle Furnace 750 • 750 0.00 

6 Muffle Furnace 1100 • 1100 0.00 

•Used 600.015 Pyrometer and Thermocouple Serial Number 746940350496 as Reference Thermometer 

Source = Type of calibration system used. •= Water Cooled Probe 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) 

..__ X 100 = < 1.5% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 

E• 1.1 ~ ~ , FArl 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

THERMOCOUPLES 

Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature 

Date: 01/03/95 Barometric Pressure, In. Hg: 29.290 

Ambient Temperature. Deg. F: 68 Reference Thermometer No.: 100.022 

` Calibrated By: JCC Reference Thermometer No.: 100.017 

Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

i Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentiometer Difference 

ID No. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation 

Degree9 F Degrees F Percent, % 

300.035 

; DGM Ialet 1 Water Bath 35 34 0.20 

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 

3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00 

300.035 

~ DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 35 35 0.00 

2 Water Bath 68 68 0.00 1 3 Water Bath 139 140 -0.17 

300.045 

DGM Inlet 1 Water Bath 35 34 0.20 

2 Water Bath 67 68 -0.19 

~ 3 Water Bath 140 140 0.00 

300.045 

DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 34 34 0.00 

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 

~ 3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00 

300.067 

DGM Inlet 1 Water Bath 35 33 0.40 

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 

3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00 

~ 300.067 

~ DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 35 33 0.40 

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 

3 Water Bath 139 139 0.00 

300.100 

DGM Inlet 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20 

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 

3 Water Bath 137 138 -0.17 

~ 300.100 

DGM Outlet 1 Water Bath 33 32 0.20 

2 Water Bath 68 67 0.19 

3 Water Bath 137 138 -0.17 

Source = Type of calibration system uaed. 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) 

X 100 = <1S% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 I 
TEMPERATURE SENSOR CALIBRATION FORM 

THERMOCOUPLES 

Tolerance: +/- 1.5% of Absolute Temperature 

Date: 01/03/95 

Ambient Temperature, Deg. F: 68 

Calibrated By: JCC 

Barometric Pressure. In. Hg: 

Reference Thertnometer P1o.: 

29.290 

100.022 

Reference Thermocouple Temperature 

Thermocouple Reference Thermometer Potentlometer Dlfference 

ID iYo. Point Source Temperature Temperature Calculation 

Degrees F Degrees F Percent, % 

Umbilicral Adaptor #1 

300.030 1 Water Bath 32 34 -0.41 

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 

3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 

Umbilical Adaptor #2 

300.031 1 Water Bath 32 33 -0.20 

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 

3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 

Umbilical Adaptor #3 

300.032 1 Water Bath 32 32 0.00 

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 

3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 

Umbiilcal Adaptor #4 

300.042 1 Water Bath 32 32 0.00 

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 

3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 

Umbilical Adaptor #5 

300.043 1 Water Bath 32 33 -0.20 

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 

3 Water Bath 86 86 0.00 

Umbiiical Adaptor #6 

300.044 1 Water Bath 32 32 0.00 

2 Water Bath 50 50 0.00 

3 Water Bath 86 87 -0.18 

Source = Type of calibration system used. 

Temperature Difference Calculation: 

(Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460) -(Test Temp. Deg. F+ 460) 

X 100 = <1S% 

Ref. Temp. Deg. F+ 460 

~u F711 C, 
EVER READY THERMOMETER CO., INC. 

228 LACKAWANNA AVENUE 

WEST PATERSON, NJ 07424 

(201) 812-7474 

PAGE 1 OF 

R E P 0 R T 0 F CALIBRATION 

LIQUID- IN-GLASS-THERMOMETER 

CALIBRATED BY EVER READY THERMOMETER C0. 

MARKED: ERTCO CAT 1002-3FC S/N-2890 

RANGE: +30 TO +124 DEGREES F IN 0.2 DEGREE GRADUATIONS. 

THERMOMETER CORRECTION 

READING (ITS-90)** 

31.94 F 

40.00 

60.00 

100.00 

120.00 

0.06 F 

0.00 

0.00 

0.06 

0.00 

** ALL TEMPERATURES IN THIS REPORT ARE BASED ON THE INTERNATIONAL 

TEMPERATURE SCALE OF 1990 (ITS-90) PUBLISHED IN THE METROLGIA 27, 

N0. 1, 3/10/90. 

t'HIS THERMOMETER WAS CALIBRATED AGAINST A STANDARD CALIBRATED AT THE 

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY (NIST) FORMERLY THE 

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDAR.DS (NBS) IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM METHOD 

E 77, AND NBS MONOGRAPH 174. 

FOR A DISCUSION OF ACCURACIES ATTAINABLE WITH SUCH THERMOMETERS SEE 

, NBS MONOGRAPH 250-23. 

IF NO SIGN IS GIVEN ON THE CORRECTION, THE TRUE TEMPERATURE IS HIGHER 

THAN THE INDICATED TEMPERATURE; IF THE SIGN GIVEN IS NEGATIVE, THE TRUE 

TEMPERATURE IS LOWER THAN THE INDICATED TEMPERATURE. TO USE THE CORRECTIONS PROPERLY, REFERENCE SHOULD BE MADE TO THE NOTES GIVEN BELOW. 

THE THERMOMETER WAS TESTED IN A LARGE, CLOSED-TOP, ELECTRICALLY HEATED, 

LIQUID BATH, BEING - IMiERSED" 76MM. THE TEMPERATURE OF THE ROOM WAS 

ABOUT 25 DEGREES C(77 DEGREES F). IF THE THERMOMETER IS USED UNDER 

CONDITIONS WHICH WOULD CAUSE THE AVERAGE TEMPERATURE OF THE EMERGENT 

LIQUID COLUIN TO DIFFER MARICEDLY FROM THAT PREVAILING IN THE TEST, 

APPRECIABLE DIFFERENCES IN THE INDICATIONS OF THE THERMOMETER WOULD 

RESULT . 

CONTINUED 

TEST NUMBER: 145875 

iATE: 03/29/94 

STANDARD SERIAL N0. 128239 

NIST IDENTIFICATION N0. 88024 

,- i 
EVER READY THERMOPMETER CO., INC. PAGE 2 OF 2 

R E P 0 R T 0 F CALIBRATION 

LIQUID-IN-GLASS-THERMOMETER 

THE TABULATED CORRECTIONS APPLY PROVIDED THE ICE-POINT READING, TAREN 

AFTER EXPOSURE FOR NOT LESS THAN 3 DAYS TO A TEMPERATURE OF ABOUT 20 

DEGREES C(70 DEGREES F) IS 31.94 DEGREES F. IF THE ICE-POINT READING 

IS FOUND TO BE HIGHER (OR LOWER) THAN STATED, ALL OTHER READINGS WILL 

BE HIGHER (OR LOWER) TO THE SAME EXTENT. IF THE THERMOMETER IS USED 

AT A GIVEN TEMPERATURE SHORTLY AFTER BEING HEATED TO A HIGHER TEMPERATURE. 

ANERROR OF 0.01 DEGREES OR LESS, FOR EACH 10 DEGREE DIF'FERENCE BETWEEN 

THE TWO TEMPER.ATURES, MAY BE INTRODUCED. THE TABULATED CORRECTIONS APPLY 

IF THE THERMOMETER IS USED IN THE UPRIGHT POSITION; IF USED IN A HORIZONTAL 

POSITION, THE INDICATIONS MAY BE A FEW HUNDREDTHS OF A DEGREE HIGHER. 

TEST NUMBER: 145875 

DATE: 03/29/94 

STANDARD SERIAL NO. 128239 

NIST IDENTIFICATION N0. 88024 - _ •~~__ ------------ ~ ~ --- 

Charles Tang-Niaa 

QUALITY CONTROL MANAGER 

KPZ 
Instruments 

453 

NATIONAL WEATHER SERUICE TYPE 

IVIERCURIAL BAROMETERS 

Usable up to 900 metres (3,000 feet) 

i re National Weather Servica ype barcrr,eter is PRINCO's highest 

grade mercurial baronecer. It is .:sed by weather services and 

airports the wcrfd over. T'ne glass tube has a uniforn inside 

dfameter of 7 mm for constant cacillary depression throughout the 

length of the scale. Scales are set at the factory by comparison 

with a baroneter certified by the National Bureau of Standards, and 

read tne locai pressure without the necessity of correctirtg for . 

capillary depression. The vernier can be s.moothly and precisely set 

by means of a rack and ainion d, ive. controiled by a knurled 

adjusting knob. White plastic bac:<grounds ori the mounting panel 

facilitate observation of the Forin type cistern and mercury coiumrt. 

i ne venier has a sightir5 -adge, frcnt and rear, to avoid paraltax. 

A suspension bracicet and an aCiustable rrng c!amp for the cfstem 

hold ttze barcneter firmly in the vertfcal position ort the mounting 

panel. A dual scale CelsiuslFartranrteit therncmeter with a— 25 to 

50°C/—t0 to t20°F range indicates the proper temperature to be 

used for tencerature correctiors. An instruction booklet with 

information for undersiandinS anc procer use of the barometer is 

supolied with each instrument. Comclete correc:ion tables for 

temperature and gravity are includeG. 

T'nis barometer is accurate to =0.3 mb, 0.2 mm, or 0.01 inch of 

mercury wihen carefulhy set ard read. and after temperature and 

gravity correctfors ;ia%,e been acalied. For greatest accuracy a 

Certiffcate of Calibraaon may be obtained and the correctiort 

contained therein also applied. Each National Weather Service 

barometer rtas a serial number. 

1'ne rugged construction of the National Weather Service type 

barometer is sucM that it can be sl`irpped safely by United Parcet 

Service or express. The kidskin bag, in the Fortin type reservoir, 

dampens mercury coiumn oscitiations durfng shipment. The lower 

part of the glass tube is narrowed down to minimize mercury 

weight, and is protected by foam cushions, thus offering added 

resistance to damage during shipment. The cisterrt may be .apened 

in ttie field for cleaning of the cistern glass and cistem mercury. Ttte 

barometer contains approximate!y o80 grams (1.5 pounds) of inercury 

total. It is shipped completely assembled, fiiled with mercury and 

ready to use. Mounting panel dimensions are 19 x 76 x 1072 mm 

(3!4 x 3 x 42 inches). The shippirg weight is 5 kg (i i pourtds) and box 

dfinensions are 235 x 250 x 1197 mm (9 x 10 x 47 inches). 

Catalog Number scales 

453 inch and millimetre 

45381 inch and millibar 

453MB millibar and millimetre 

I,P __ ~ 
• 

SARTORIUS CORPORATION • TECHNICAL SERVICES DIVISION s~ r U r' u S 

BALANCE CERTIEI CATE o fCALIBRATI O N 

CUSTOMER ~L ~ G 406Z s2a 0 2 7 4 2 

/~.~I Q~S Ti~/~ / T~' ~d NEXT CAL.IBRATIO N DATE: 

~ffJ9l1L.OTTF /(I ~ .~.~DL~ DATE OF ISSUE:g ' / - g~ 

DEPT:: ENVIRONMENTAL CONDTITONS: ''O°` 

~IAKE: / MODEL: 109079ws SERYAL J 942400,52 

17iis certi~ies that the test weight,s used are traceable to the "

National Irrstitute of Standards & Technology 

Sartorius Weight set ID#: 

Calibrated to Class: ~ 

Date weight set cahibrated: eo' 7' gz/ 

Date weight set due: ;,' ?' 9 

N.I.S.T. Test number: 731Z .2 4f 36 6 9 

CORNER LOAD ERROR 

A B 

D (j) C 

FRONT - * Not applicaWe to circular paas 

T T1~7FAl2T?'V t'~TFt''TZ• 

Nominal Value Before Adjustment After Adjustment 

~ oD. oo /9 ~Ot~ •oo00 

106.0000I ~ Oo • 0000 

.5 • oa O • 0000 So .ocoo 

O, /O.oaoO 

. 1 1 

Sartorius Service 

3- / - 9~ 

Date 

133 Fiaaedaod Bl"d. 

Fdgeweod, Ne+v York 11717 

Toll Feem (800) 846-3108 ~ 

Ptsonr. (516) 2344249 

Fsac (518) 234.4252 RE;:. 52n9nd0d 

c I n 

~:PO~rs 

s,I.A~vs A B C D* 

BEFORE ADJ. , ~oy 

A~'TER A.DJ. 

o a o 
Wei g ht-Cal' 

~ ertiTicate - 

~ 

~ 

, . 

~ d-Lion 

' TROEMNER iNC. . 

IT LAAANUFACftJRERS OF PAECISION WEIGMTS . . . 

pr M/ SS STANQARDS • BALANCES • I.A80RATDRY APPAFUTUS 

W! MmlMwr MIMUt NRAOeJ"A. Pit ri142 

rnar 21errt44M . a= rsrrtww 

Sartorius Corp. 

131 Heartland Blvd. 

Edgewood, NY 11717 

Test Completed: 02/21/94 

Order Number: XFER-017776 

Control Number: 37494 

Weight Set S/N: 732-A2 

~ Description of Weights: 100q - lmq Weight Set 

I

Material Density (g/cm3 at 20 C) Range 

l Tested with Reference Standards Traceable to the National Institute 

of Standards & Technology under NIST Test No. 731/243669 

' We certify that the weights listed are calibrated to Class 1 

The calibration of these weights is based on apparent mass vs. 

material of density 8.0q/cm3. 

I * DENOTES WEIGHT IS MARKED WITH A DOT 

CORRECTION CORRECTION 

''?GHT SIZE BEFORE AFTER UNCERTAINTY TOLERANCE 

CALIHRATION CALIBRATION ( + or - ) ( + or - ) 

100 g +0.109 mq +0.109 mg 0.0700 mq 0.250 mg 

50 g -0.184 mq +0.089 mg 0.0300 mg 0.120 mq 

20 q +0.000 mg +0.000 mq 0.0200 mq 0.074 mq 

20 g+r -0.002 mq -0.002 mg 0.0200 mg 0.074 mg 

10 q -0.007 mq -0.007 mg 0.0190 mq 0.050 mg 

5 g +0.0290 mg +0.0290 mq 0.0130 mq 0.034 mg 

2 q +0.0076 mq +0.0076 mq 0.0066 mg 0.034 mg 

2 g + +0.0191 mq +0.0191 mq 0.0066 mg 0.034 mg 

1 g +0.0041 mq +0.0041 mg 0.0038 mq 0.034 mg 

500 mq (New) -0.0370 mq +0.0065 mq 0.0032 mg 0.010 mg 

200 mq (New) -0.0270 mq +0.0049 mg 0.0015 mq 0.010 mg 

200 =; •(New) -0.0265 mq +0.0074 mq 0.0015 mq 0.010 mq 

100 mq -0.0075 mq -0.0075 mg 0.0021 mg 0.010 mq 

50 mq +0.0046 mq +0.0046 mg 0.0021 mg 0.010 mq 

20 mq -0.0070 mq -0.0070 mg 0.0022 mq 0.010 mq 

20 mq * +0.0000 mq +0.0000 mg 0.0022 mq 0.010 mq 

10 mq (New) -0.0120 mq +0.0000 mq 0.0013 mq 0.010 mq 

5 mq +0.0045 mq +0.0045 mq 0.0029 mq 0.010 mq 

2 mq -0.0020 mq -0.0020 mq 0.0010 mg 0.010 mq 

2 mq * -0.0050 mq -0.0050 mq 0.0010 mq 0.010 mq 

1 mq -0.0004 mq -0.0004 mq 0.0025 mq 0.010 mg 

Temperature 23 C Pressure 761,0 mm Hq Relative Humidity 40 % 

The above calibration satisfies all requirements outlined in 

1, and applicable documents.• 

TROElYINER ,Na sr 

Fralf7c Ward, Metroloqy Manaqer 

By i

% ~. 

...✓ C~`~11.f" /~~C`~ 

~usan Coakley, weiq Calibrator 

lk i 
CALIBRATION AND TEST 

WET TEST METER 

DATE: 09-08-94 

METER TYPE: AL-20 

METER SERIAL NUM. : 11088 

TEST ON FIVE FOOT BELL PROVER # 3785 

i OIL TEMP. 74 DEG. 

AIR TEMP. 73.5 DEG. 

TEST FLOW RATE PERCENT OF PROOF 

~ 118 CFH 100.0 % 

60 CFH 100.0 % 

24 CFH 099.9 % 

I 

TEST BY: HOW RD YFIE D 

I 

I ~ 

/ q l) 
d`7 4 a4. 

TO 

ot 

..• '`• ^ =. ` ` ` 4~ ` .~ , w l '`\ • t~_~1 

U.5 

f t 

-zz 

_ ~ - _ --Z ~, ~~~ 

4-4 

1

4 

_ ~ _ ~ _` _ .J ~ O ~~ 

r ~ _ ` _ ? — — _ ® i , : 

, 

00, 

EM Z-,- 
Make 934-AH 

your choice too -- 

request a sample now! 

If you're not already using the accepted standard for 

water quality testing, here's an opportunity to evaivate 

+ samptes of Whatman 934-AH. 

Whatman grade 934-AH is a smooth-surfaced, high retention glass microfibre filter intended for routine filtra- 

~ tions and water quality testing. These fiiters are produced 

entirely from the highest grade of borosilicate giass 

microfibres. are binder free and will withstand temperatures over 500°C. 

~ Whatman giass microfibre filters offer a special combination ot advantages, providing high filtration speed with 

f+etention of exiremely fine particulates. 

~ j if you're not using Whatman 934-AH, here's an opNortunity to start. Just write on your letterhead, specifying 

( the diameter you require and mail to: 

WHATMAN 934-AH GLASS MlCROFIBRE FILTERS 

THE. FIL TER OF CHOICE 

FOR SUSPENDED SOLIDS ANALYSlS 

Whatman Inc. 

9 Bridewell Place 

Clifton, New Jersey 07014 

Fortechnical inquireson 

Whatman Grade 934-AH 

CALL TOLL FREE: (800) 922-0361 

in New Jersey call (201) 773-5800 

WHATMAN 934-AH 

Availability: Circles --100 per Box 

CATALOG DIAMETER 

NUMBER (CM) PRICE/BOX 

1827-021 2.1 5 6.60 

1827-024 2.4 7.30 

1827-032 3.2 8.70 

1827-037 3.7 9.45 

1827-042 4.25 10.50 

1827-055 5.5 13.85 

1827-070 7.0 17.30 

1827-090 9.0 22.85 

1827-110 11.0 32.25 

1827-125 12.5 39.60 

1827-150 15.0 51.85 

TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS 

Weight (gsm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 

Thickness (mm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.33 

Retention (μm) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.5 

tFitration Speed (sec/100 mi) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 

DOP Penetration (0.3μm Particfe) . . . . . . . 0.02% 

Minimum Dry Tensil (g/1.5cm width) . . . . . . . . 300 

Minimum Wet Burst (psi) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0.20 

Surface . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..Smooth 

-MVzouq t.at a t0 ae "rosutlenNe. 

~.~...~~ 

WMrha,ftnarC 

Whatman Inc. 

,9,Bridewell Place, CJifton, New Jersey 07014 Telephone 201-773-5800 Telex 133426 i ~~ 
.~~f~• `, ~ '' . ~ `\ ,.~ ~~.. :;~;.• ~ .. 

~- , - x•,.. , J `~ ~ •,~ . 

i y av 

, ~, J,'. . 

. .~ 

•~~~i~~~. 

Jama A. Griham;. Xarth (IlatrIIlixia N. David Smich 

Commissiona •,\.,\\~ ~~~~~~ 

gepal`tltTe2'Lf o'f ~l$rirliltlixE 

Direcror V,'~ ' .• 

~ ~lZtt~3t~8 ~L11tStII2'i 

CERTIFICATE OF TRACEABILITY 

AND 

REPORT OF CALIBRATION 

] The standard(s) described on the following page have been compared 

to standards of the State of North Carolina and have been found to 

~ have values as listed. Traceability to the National Institute of 

Standards and Technology, NIST (formerly The National Bureau of 

Standards, NBS) is via the NIST test number listed on the report. 

Adjustments of precision laboratory standards are not recommended. 

Therefore, no adjustments have been made to these standards and 

certification to any tolerance classif cation is neither stated nor 

implied. The user(s) of these standards should examine the deviation 

from nominal value and the associated uncertainty to ascertain if these 

standards meet their precision requirements. 

~ The uncertainty is an expression of the overall uncertainty using three 

standard deviations as the limit of random errors of ineasurement plus 

 the uncertainty of the State Standard used in comparison. 

, The primary testing methodology used is the Double Substitution 

Method, NIST Handbook 145, Handbook for the Quality Assurance 

I of Metrological Measurements, SOP number 4. Three . double 

substitution weighings are averaged to arrive at the listed value. 

~ --I 
NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE 

JAMES A. GRAHAM 

COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE 

STANDARDS DIVISION 

P.O. BOX 27647, RALEIGH, N.C. 27611 

(919)733-4411 

N. DAVID SMITH, DIRECTOR 

( STATEMENT OF TRACEABILITY 

I SUBMITTED BY: Trigon Engineering Consultants, Inc. DATE OF TEST: September 7, 1994 

1920 Starita Road, Suite J TEST NUIVIBER: NC0894W072 

Charlotte, NC 28206 TOLERANCE: ASTM Class 4 

~ PO NUMBER: Verbal J A Blanton 

~ DESCRIP'ITON: 

1 - 50 

~ 1 - 30 

1 - 20 

1- 10 

5 

1- 3 

1- 2 

1 - 500 

1 - 200 

One (1) Set of Ohaus (brand) Weights, Serial Number 6640 

g weight 1- 200 mg. weight 

g weight 1- 100 mg weight 

g weight 1- 50 mg weight 

g weight 1- 20 mg weight 

g weight 1- 20 mg. weight 

g weight 1- 10 mg weight 

g weight 1- 5 mg weight 

g weight 1- 2 mg weight 

mg weight 1- 2 mg. weight 

mg weight 

* The 1 mg weight was rejected and condemned due to rough edges, a slight tear, and other imperfections. 

The items described above have been compared with the standards of the State of North Carolina, and are 

traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST via the test number shown above. 

All tests were performed in the North Carolina Standards Laboratory. Environmental conditions are 

maintained at a temperature of 22' C± 2' C and a relative humidity of 50 % ± 10 90 . 

. .. LOGIST 

L.F. Easoa Sher*•~ Teachey 

Sharon Denning :'an Hyder Karr:l Bryan 

pap 1 Ocigiaal Cectificaee Has The NCDA Seal Embosred Above 

FII.ENAME: F:IGROUPSISPANDLAB*M.ESYSITRIGON\1994\0894wO72 ^ l 
tiLDA STANDARDS LAiiUx.A1 Ux Y 

DEVICE TEST DATA SHEET 

ComP aa Y : 

Address: / 24 

City, State, Zip: ~~ A/ 

County: ~~ez 

~ Phone: ( ~Q~)S~-~~ Ext 

Representative: ~ N ~ Purchase Order No: OV c 

i CSC :`I umOc: : 

Date: 

Date Schedui/ ed: 

Avrrt.ir112 l9y 

page _/ of 

General Description: 

~ Density of Weights: — 

I Total Number of Devices: _ 

/v4 = FU3"? `~ec LCzQ= - lmg _ .7. 7/3 1 

Szri:tl Number. /eA46") Recum ia: ef, 

0-4 

 .1emized Description 

. 

~neeee 

~ 

o~. 

e 

Description 

~ 

~ 

~ 

1 

J 

, 

Date Met Wort Compteted 

~ - ( 

r. yy SD 

~ 

1ESf~d n ~ rtc 

Date Met Wort Complaed 

~ /g/9 I s 4e- k.t 

1 2 ~4 0/14) 

, 

~ 

~ Retaarl:s: ~ E ~ I ~ ' " e~ t,c h - A r [~ ~ -~~- t a ~ u1'~ — 

~ 

' 

~ 

~ (L CtL c 1'i o r.1 M . 

7

Toleri -ncc Class 

or 

alibration Only 

Number of Devices 

APP~OV~ CaGbcated Adjusted Rejected Coademtud Ice Point 

~ f ~f — ! 

— 

euolu;ist Receired By ~