alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED**


**PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of Sunrise Mining
      Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
      undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Mining
      Corporation.


Date: November
                08, 2007
              
              
              /s/
                Xuguang
                SunXuguang
                      Sun, Chief Executive Officer and President
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 16

- 00476

- CV

Jim WEYNAND

, Appellant

v.

Hugh LONG

, Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 08332 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED. It is ORDERED that appellee, Hugh Long, recover his costs of this appeal from appellan t, Jim Weynand.

SIGNED December 5, 2018.

_____________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

AUGUST 11, 2010

JOHN LEY

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

 ________________________

 No. 10-10383 

Non-Argument Calendar

 ________________________

 D.C. Docket No. 6:08-cr-00226-ACC-GJK-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

llllllllll lllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JENNIFER YOUNG,

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

 Appeal from the United States District Court

 for the Middle District of Florida

 ________________________

(August 11, 2010)

Before EDMONDSON, CARNES and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Jenny L. Devine, appointed counsel for Jennifer Young in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire

record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is

correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable

issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Young’s

conviction and sentence under Count Three are AFFIRMED.

2
Transport Transports 

Canada Canada

 TP 7245E

 

AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE

The following airworthiness directive (AD) may be applicable to an aircraft which our records indicate is registered in your name. ADs are issued pursuant to Canadian 

Aviation Regulation (CAR) 521 Division X. Pursuant to CAR 605.84 and the further details of CAR Standard 625, Appendix H, the continuing airworthiness of a Canadian registered aircraft is contingent upon compliance with all applicable ADs. Failure to comply with the requirements of an AD may invalidate the flight authorization of the aircraft. 

Alternative means of compliance shall be applied for in accordance with CAR 605.84 and the above-referenced Standard. 

This AD has been issued by the Continuing Airworthiness Division (AARDG), National Aircraft Certification Branch, Transport Canada, Ottawa, telephone 613 952-4357.

Pursuant to CAR 202.51 the registered owner of a Canadian aircraft shall, within seven days, notify the Minister in writing of any change of his or her name or address. 

To request a change of address, contact the Civil Aviation Communications Centre (AARC) at Place de Ville, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0N8, or 1-800-305-2059, or www.tc.gc.ca/civilaviation/communications/centre/ address.asp 

24-0022 (01-2005)

1/1 No.

CF-2011-06

Issue Date 

 26 April 2011 

Number: CF- 2011-06 

Subject: Airstair Door – Blocked Water Drainage Path

Effective: 17 May 2011 

Applicability: Bombardier Inc. DHC-8 Aeroplanes, Models 400, 401, and 402, Serial 

Numbers 4161 through 4296 

Compliance: As indicated below unless already accomplished 

Background: Several operators have reported difficulties in opening the airstair door. 

Investigation revealed that the airstair door gearbox drain paths were blocked by 

sealant, causing water to accumulate and freeze in the gearbox assembly. An

airstair door that is unable to be opened could hinder evacuation in the event of 

an emergency. 

This directive mandates a one-time inspection and rectification for sealant 

interfering with the airstair gearbox drain paths. 

Corrective 

Actions: 

Within 600 hours air time after the effective date of this directive, inspect the 

gearbox drain paths for blockages and rectify as required, in accordance with the 

Accomplishment Instructions in Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-53-48, dated 02 

December 2010, or later revisions approved by the Chief, Continuing 

Airworthiness, Transport Canada. 

Authorization: For the Minister of Transport, Infrastructure and Communities 

ORIGINAL SIGNED BY 

Derek Ferguson 

Chief, Continuing Airworthiness 

Contact: Miss Helen Tsai, Continuing Airworthiness, Ottawa, telephone 613-952-4357, 

facsimile 613-996-9178 or e-mail CAWWEBFeedback@tc.gc.ca or any Transport 

Canada Centre.
OxyCo2LL C ^Tio^r-PoiTAjioN 

Noticeof Company Name Change . i, , 

April 26, 2010 y 

Dear Customers and Vendors, 

We would like to thank you for all your support and loyalty the past several years. 

With the approval of all required agencies as of April 15, 2010, we have changed 

our company name to OxyGo2 LLC from Oxiife LLC 

• Our new domain name will be www.oxvqensuperstore.com 

• Our new toll free number Is: 877-569-9462 (877"5oxygo2) 

• Our new email address is: oxvgo2(S)att.net 

• Fax and local number as well as address will not change but remain the 

same 

Even though we are changing our name, we want to stress that OxyGo2 service, 

support, and long term commitment towards customers will remain unchanged. We 

will continue our efforts to offer our customers a full range of products, solutions 

and services driven by their needs, to fulfill our mission and vision of becoming a 

global respiratory leader.. 

We will begin to use the new name on all our official documents and in all our 

operation activities going forward. All contracts and legal documents previously 

signed by "OxLife LLC" will remain valid, and the corresponding obHgations and 

rights will be assumed by ''OxyGo2". The name change wlifl not a^ff&ct any account 

information, business process, and point of contact that you have with OxyGo2 

LLC, all of which will not be changed. We apologize for any inconveniertGe \\\Q\ 

may be brought on by the name change. 

Thanks again for your cooperation during this time of change, and we hope to 

have your continuous support. 

For more Information, please visit our website: ww.oxygensuperstore.com 

Sincerely 

Oxygo2 (Formally OxLife LLC) 

141 Twin Spring s RdHendersonviiie ; NC28792 

(828)684-735 3 (877) 569-9462 Fa x (828} 684-8990
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

For the Fifth Circuit

___________________________

No. 98-50417

___________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

VERSUS

MICHAEL DAVID FONDREN,

Defendant-Appellant.

___________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(P-97-CR-36-1)

 ___________________________________________________

April 15, 1999

Before GARWOOD, DAVIS, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

After reviewing the record in this case and considering the

briefs of the parties, we conclude that under all the facts and

circumstances presented, the district court did not err in

concluding that the border patrol officer had reasonable suspicion

sufficient to justify the stop of defendant’s vehicle.

AFFIRMED.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

August 20, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00344

- CV

John B. URBAHNS

, Appellant

v.

LSREF2 COBALT (TX), LLC, Appellee

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CI22479 Honorable Richard Price, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On July 24, 2018, after it appeared the notice of appeal was not timely filed, we ordered
Appellant to show cause in writing w hy this appeal should not be dismissed for want of
jurisdiction. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 42.3(a); Verburgt v. Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997)

. Appellant timely filed a response; our July 24, 2018 order is satisfied.

On August 6, 2018, Appellant filed an unopposed motion for extension of time to file his

brief until fourteen days after this court issued an order on jurisdiction in this appeal. On August
10, 2018, Appellant filed a second unopposed motion for extension of time to file his brief until
August 27, 2018.

The appellate record is not complete; the reporter’ s record has not been filed.

Appellant’s first and second motion s for extension of time to file the brief are MOOT.
Appellant’s brief will be due twenty days after the appellate record is complete.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 20th day of August, 2018

.

___________________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

, Clerk of Court
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AND EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(b) AND 15d-14(b)


(Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Yongye International, Inc. (the “Company”), does hereby
certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:




The
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 of the Company
fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained
in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 11, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Zishen WuZishen
      WuPresident
      and CEODated:
      August 11, 2010
            By:
            /s/
      Sam YuSam
      YuChief
      Financial Officer
Attachment 1 A

FY 2020 VERAs, VSIPs PROCESSING COSTS UNDER CONSOLIDATED

APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020, P.L. 116-93

REMITTANCE REPORT FOR FY 2020 VERAs

Remittance Date: 

Reporting Entity: POC Name: 

POC Email address: POC Phone Number: FY 2020 Retirement Month:

IPAC (MM/YYYY)

Funds submitted by: EFT FY 2020 VERAs

(Indicate IPAC, EFT or CHECK) CHECK

Payroll Office Number: Agency Location Code: Number of Covered Employees Amount Submitted

(Column 1) (Column 2) (Column 3) Column 3 x $481.62

FERS

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

TOTALS (A) $

CSRS

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

TOTALS (B) $

AMOUNT SUBMITTED $

(Must Equal A + B)

I certify to the best of my knowledge, the accuracy and completeness of this Remittance Report. (To Be Reproduced Locally)

(Use additional forms if needed)

Signature Name - Printed
Attachment 1 B

FY 2020 VERAs, VSIPs PROCESSING COSTS UNDER CONSOLIDATED

APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020, P.L. 116-93

REMITTANCE REPORT FOR FY 2020 VSIP

Remittance Date: 

Reporting Entity: POC Name: 

POC Email address: POC Phone Number: FY 2020 Retirement Month:

IPAC (MM/YYYY)

Funds submitted by: EFT FY 2020 VSIPs

(Indicate IPAC, EFT or CHECK) CHECK

Payroll Office Number: Agency Location Code: Number of Covered Employees Amount Submitted

(Column 1) (Column 2) (Column 3) Column 3 x $481.62

FERS

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

-- -- --

--

TOTALS (A) $

CSRS

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

TOTALS (B) $

AMOUNT SUBMITTED $

(Must Equal A + B)

I certify to the best of my knowledge, the accuracy and completeness of this Remittance Report. (To Be Reproduced Locally)

(Use additional forms if needed)

Signature Name - Printed
Attachment 1 C

FY 2020 VERAs, VSIPs PROCESSING COSTS UNDER CONSOLIDATED

APPROPRIATIONS ACT, 2020, P.L. 116-93

REMITTANCE REPORT FOR FY 2020 VERAs with VSIPs

Remittance Date: 

Reporting Entity: POC Name: 

POC Email address: POC Phone Number: FY 2020 Retirement Month:

IPAC (MM/YYYY)

Funds submitted by: EFT FY 2020 VERAs with VSIPs

(Indicate IPAC, EFT or CHECK) CHECK

Payroll Office Number: Agency Location Code: Number of Covered Employees Amount Submitted

(Column 1) (Column 2) (Column 3) Column 3 x $481.62

FERS

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

TOTALS (A) $

CSRS

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

-- -- -- --

TOTALS (B) $

AMOUNT SUBMITTED $

(Must Equal A + B)

I certify to the best of my knowledge, the accuracy and completeness of this Remittance Report. (To Be Reproduced Locally)

(Use additional forms if needed)

Signature Name - Printed
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chad
C. Braun, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                
| |    |                                                                                                                                                       
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
 material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
 Company.

|                         |     |                    |                                                                   | 
|------------------------ | --- | ------------------ | ----------------------------------------------------------------- | 
|Date: November 25,
 2009 | By: | /s/ Chad C.
 Braun |                                                                  
|                         |     | Name:              | Chad C.
 Braun                                                    | 
|                         |     | Title              | Executive
 Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer

---
#### LEWIS v. STATE.

No. 20184.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 15, 1939.

J. E. Newberry and Joe Bailey Morris, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder without malice; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

(1) The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

(2) The sentence is reformed in order that it may be shown that appellant is condemned to confinement in the penitentiary for not less than one nor more than three years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### Lester W. CONNACHER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20767.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge. '

Conviction is for aggravated assault, punishment being assessed at a fine of $25.

' Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he does not desire to further prosecute his appeal, and at his request same is hereby dismissed.
FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 12/23/2015 3:24:02 PM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, the undersigned officer of First Trinity Financial Corporation, an Oklahoma corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies that:To my knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.        Date:  November 12, 2007 By:  /s/ Gregg Zahn    Gregg Zahn, President and Chief Executive Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3589 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to ensure continuing funding for 

the United States Merchant Marine Academy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 22, 2015 

Mr. ISRAEL introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 46, United States Code, to ensure continuing 

funding for the United States Merchant Marine Academy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Midshipmen Education 

5 Certainty Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CONTINUING FUNDING FOR THE UNITED STATES 

7 MERCHANT MARINE ACADEMY. 

8 Section 51301 of title 46, United States Code, is 

9 amended by adding at the end the following: 

10 ‘‘(c) CONTINUING FUNDING.— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3589 IH

1 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Out of any funds in the 

2 general fund of the Treasury not otherwise appro3 priated, there are hereby appropriated such sums as 

4 are necessary for operations of the United States 

5 Merchant Marine Academy for any period during 

6 which interim or full-year appropriations are not in 

7 effect for the United States Merchant Marine Acad8 emy, for fiscal year 2016 and each fiscal year there9 after. 

10 ‘‘(2) TERMINATION.—Funds made available for 

11 a fiscal year by this subsection shall remain available 

12 until whichever of the following first occurs: 

13 ‘‘(A) The enactment into law of an appro14 priation for such fiscal year (including a con15 tinuing appropriation) for such operations. 

16 ‘‘(B) The enactment into law for the Mari17 time Administration of the applicable regular 

18 appropriation for such fiscal year, or continuing 

19 appropriations resolution for such fiscal year, 

20 without any appropriation for such oper21 ations.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00022

- CR

J ASON E UGENE A RNOLD

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 396th District Court

of Tarrant C ounty (1424463D)

January 10, 2019

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no reversible error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment

of th e trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

Justice Lee Gabriel
EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Castillo, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Emilia Ochoa, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
8th day of August, 2007.


/s/ Emilia Ochoa
------------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002



In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Quture International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2012, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, G. Landon Feazell, Principal
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



1. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.



| | /s/ G. Landon Feazell      
| | ---------------------------
| | G. Landon Feazell          
| | Principal Executive Officer
| | September 19, 2012         



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to Mediswipe, Inc. and will be retained by Mediswipe, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### JAMIE v. STATE.

No. 18123.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 25, 1936.

Grady L. Fox, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery with firearms; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for six years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The facts heard in the trial court are not brought forward for review. No complaint of the procedure has been presented by bills of exception or otherwise.

The judgment is affirmed.