alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Office of Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 22-801 Date: August 2, 2022

Subject: The Federal Flexible Spending Account

Program (FSAFEDS): 2022 Administrative Fees

Purpose

To notify agencies that the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS) administrative fees will change for 2022. The reserve account

fee will remain the same for the 2022 benefit period. FSAFEDS fees are 

detailed in Benefit Administration Letter 21-801.

Background

Administrative Fees

Agencies pay administrative fees to HealthEquity, the third-party

administrator under contract with the Office of Personnel Management

(OPM), on behalf of their employees enrolled in FSAFEDS. To maintain 

market competitiveness and retain an adequate Reserve Account, OPM 

determines annually if there will be a buy-down of administrative fees for

participating agencies. For the 2022 benefit year, there will be no buy-down.

Dependent-Care Flexible Spending Account (DCFSA) Administrative

Fee 

The DCFSA administrative fee is $2.73 per DCFSA per month. This fee is for 

the entire 2022 benefit period. 
Benefits Administration Letter 22-801 

2 

Health-Care Flexible Spending Account (HCFSA) Administrative Fee

The HCFSA administrative fee is $2.73 per HCFSA per month. This fee is for 

the entire 2022 benefit period. 

Limited Expense Health Care Flexible Spending Account (LEX HCFSA)

Administrative Fee

The LEX HCFSA administrative fee is $2.73 per LEX HCFSA per month. This

fee is for the entire 2022 benefit period. 

Reserve Account Fee

Agencies pay the reserve account fee to OPM on behalf of their employees

enrolled in FSAFEDS. For 2022, the monthly reserve fee will remain

unchanged at $.25 per HCFSA per month.

The anticipated schedule for the task order and quarterly invoices is as

follows: 

• February 2022: Initial Task Order Request distributed

• March 2022: Agencies submit fully executed task orders

• April 2022: Q1 2022 (January-March) quarterly invoice distributed

• July 2022: Q2 2022 (April-June) quarterly invoice distributed

• October 2022: Q3 2022 (July-September) quarterly invoice distributed

• November 2022: Q3 2022 (October-November) Task Order Catch-up 

Request distributed 

• December 2022: Agencies submit fully executed Task Order

Modifications (as applicable) 

• January 2023: Q4 2022 (October-December) quarterly and Catch-up 

invoices distributed

HealthEquity sent out the initial task order request in February. The

agencies should have submitted an executed task order, to receive the first 

quarterly invoice in April 2022. Subsequent quarterly invoices will be sent 

accordingly. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment. Please ensure

that all past due fees are also paid promptly. 
Benefits Administration Letter 22-801 

3 

Sincerely, 

Laurie Bodenheimer

Associate Director

Healthcare and Insurance
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      Morry Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ **MORRY
                F. RUBIN****Morry
                F. Rubin****Chief
                Executive Officer****November
                19, 2007**
JEl§U:lECT 

May 14, 2013 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building Ground Floor, 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: Exemption 9882A 

Dear Sir 

Jet Select, LLC a Part 135 on demand operator based in Columbus, Ohio would like to 

formally request an extension to Exemption 9882A issued by your office. 

Reference: Docket Number FAA-2009-0333 

We are requesting that our crewmembers be able to continue to operate domestically 

with a lost or destroyed certificate provided they are given a copy of the current lost or 

destroyed certificate that is contained in our approved record keeping system. 

Furthermore, we ask that this apply to all flight crewmembers employed by Jet Select 

while engaged in flight operations for the organization. 

It is our belief that granting an extension of this exemption is in the interest of the public 

and provides no reduction in the level of safety since the crewmember actually holds the 

lost or destroyed certificate. 

Sincerely, 

A-t c;~----- Gregory Marcussen 

Director of Operations 

Jet Select LLC 

614-338-4389 

4130 E. Fifth Ave., Columbus, OH 43219 

(614) 338-4380- Office 

(614) 338-0984- Fax
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K/A
 Amendment No. 1 to Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
 Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported): August 31, 2007
 H&E Equipment Services, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Delaware
    
    000-51759
    
    81-0553291(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission
    
    (I.R.S. Employerof incorporation)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)11100 Mead Road, Suite 200, Baton 
Rouge, Louisiana
    
    
    
    70816(Address of principal executive 
offices)
    
    
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: (225) 298-5200
 Not Applicable
 Former name or former address, if changed since last report
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of AssetsItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXAudited Balance Sheet of J.W. Burress, Inc. as of December 31, 2006Unaudited Balance Sheet of J.W. Burress, Inc. as of June 30, 2007Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets.
  
 Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
      99.1
    
    Audited Balance Sheet of J.W. Burress, Incorporated as of December
31, 2006, and the related Statement of Income, Statement of
Stockholders Equity, and Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2006, and the notes thereto.99.2
    
    The Unaudited Balance Sheet of J.W. Burress, Incorporated as of June
30, 2007 and the related Statements of Income and Cash Flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the notes thereto.99.3
    
    The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet of H&E Equipment
Services, Inc. as of June 30, 2007 and the Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Statement of Income for H&E Equipment Services,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 and six months ended June
30, 2007.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  H&E Equipment Services, Inc.November 7, 2007
    By:

/s/ Leslie S. MageeName:
    Leslie S. MageeTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



No.
    
    Exhibit99.1
    
    Audited Balance Sheet of J.W. Burress, Incorporated as of December
31, 2006, and the related Statement of Income, Statement of Stockholders Equity, and Statement of Cash Flows for the year
ended December 31, 2006, and the notes thereto.99.2
    
    The Unaudited Balance Sheet of J.W. Burress, Incorporated as of June
30, 2007 and the related Statements of Income and Cash Flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and the notes thereto.99.3
    
    The Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet of H&E Equipment
Services, Inc. as of June 30, 2007 and the Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Combined Statement of Income for H&E Equipment Services,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 and six months ended June
30, 2007.
## Draft Protocol EWIMS Data Team Meeting Log

The Team Meeting Log will be completed by each EWIMS Data team after each meeting and

will be collected by the evaluation team on a monthly basis. The evaluation team will use this

information to document the quality and frequency of EWIMS data team meetin gs as an

indicator of fidelity of implementation.

Meeting Date:

Meeting Time: <##:##> to <##:##>

Participants: <Prepopulate with EWIMS team members, and have space for others>

Activities: (check all that apply)

- Discussed individual students (How many? __ _ )

- Discussed groups of students

o Students with disabilities

o Students who are disadvantaged

o Students by race/ethnicity

o English Language Learners

o Custom Cohort

o Other (specify:

_______________________________________________________)

- Assigned students to int erventions (How many students? H ow many interventions?)

- Other activities:

o

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

____________

o

_____________________________________ _____________________________

__________________________________________________________________

____________

o

__________________________________________________________________

__________________________________________________________________

____________

Rep orts Used During the Meeting:

- Student

- L evel Reports

o Flagged Student Report

o Flagged Student Report: Disabilities

o Flagged Student Report: Disadvantaged

o Flagged Student Report: ELL

o Incoming Indicator of Risk Report

o Incoming Indicator of Risk Transition Report

o Off

- to On

- Track Report

o On

- to Off

- Track Reporto Flagged Student Intervention Report

o Intervention Report

o Under

- Credited Student Report

o Student Dropout Report

o Custom Reports:

- School

- Level Reports

o Risk Indicator Summary Report

o Risk Indic ator Summary Report: Disability Categories

o Indicator Summary Report: Disadvantaged

o Indicator Summary Report: ELL

o Enrollment Status Summary Report

o Intervention Summary Report: Program

o Intervention Summary Report: Tiers

o Intervention Summary Report: Type

o Inco ming Indicator Transition Report

- Detailed Student Reports (##)

- Student

- Level Intervention Summary

Action Items:

Item Person Responsible Date Due
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

I, John D. Feehan, Jr., Chief Financial Officer of Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. (the Company), certify that:



|(1) | the report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act); and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods referred to in the Report.
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |  |  |                           
|------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 11, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    John D. Feehan, Jr.
|                   |  |  |  | John D. Feehan, Jr.       
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. and will be retained by Virgin Mobile
USA, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32

      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Emilia Ochoa, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge,
Castillo, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Castillo, Inc.


Date: May 8, 2008                     By: /s/ Emilia Ochoa
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                      Name:  Emilia Ochoa
                                      Title: Chief Executive & Financial Officer
Exhibit 35.4

Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of October 8, 2013 through December 16, 2013

CGCMT 2012-GC8

In accordance with
the requirements detailed in §10.08 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (Agreement) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (CWCAM), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing this
Officers Certificate with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAMs activities during the period noted above and of CWCAMs performance under this Agreement has been made under my supervision; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled all its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout the period noted above.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC

/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President
**Exhibit 34.2**

 

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

The Board of Directors  U.S. Bank National Association

 

We have examined management’s assertion, including the accompanying Report on Assessment of Compliance with Applicable Servicing Criteria, that U.S. Bank National Association (the Company) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform (the Platform), for which the Company provides trustee, registrar, paying agent, and securities administrator services, as of October 31, 2013, and for the period from November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2013, except for servicing criteria 1122 (d)(1)(i)-(iv), 1122 (d)(2)(i), 1122 (d)(2)(iii), 1122 (d)(2)(vi)-(vii), 1122 (d)(3)(i), and 1122 (d)(4)(i)-(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination.

 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset-backed transactions and securities that comprise the Platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria.

 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of October 31, 2013, and for the period from November 1, 2012 through October 31, 2013, for the Corporate Trust Asset-Backed Securities Platform is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 
|   | /s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|--------|--------------------------------|

 

January 8, 2014

 

----
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Roberto Cardenas, Defendant-Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Diana M. Boyar, J.), rendered January 13, 2013, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of false personation, and imposing sentence.</p><p>Per Curiam.</p><p>Judgment of conviction (Diana M. Boyar, J.), rendered January 13, 2013, affirmed.</p><p>Defendant's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary. At the plea proceeding, defendant knowingly acknowledged his desire to plead guilty to false personation (<i>see</i> Penal Law ยง 190.23); admitted the details of his crime; and acknowledged his understanding of the rights he was waiving by pleading guilty <i>(see Boykin v Alabama</i>, 395 US 238 [1969]), including the right to a trial, the right to have the prosecution prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, and the right to have his lawyer present a defense (<i>see People v Conceicao</i>, 26 NY3d 375, 382 [2015]; <i>People v Sougou</i>, 26 NY3d 1052, 1054 [2015]).</p><p>Defendant's claim that he was not specifically advised during the plea allocution that his sentence would include a conditional discharge is unavailing. Defendant pleaded guilty in exchange for a promised sentence of "one day of community service," and he was sentenced in accordance with his plea agreement. Although the court did not specifically articulate the words "conditional discharge" during the allocution, defendant was released with respect to the misdemeanor charge for which he pleaded guilty, without imprisonment or probation supervision. In the circumstances, the direction to perform community service could be effectuated only through a conditional discharge (<i>see </i>Penal Law ยง 65.05[2]; <i>People v Stuart</i>, 138 AD2d 425, 425-426 [1988]; <a href="../2015/2015_03578.htm" target="_blank"><i>People v Carr</i>, 127 AD3d 1503</a> [2015]). Moreover, defendant was advised and agreed to the one day of community service, the sole condition imposed, without raising any objection (<a href="../2010/2010_05600.htm" target="_blank"><i>see People v Murray</i>, 15 NY3d 725</a>, 726-727 [2010]), and he does not allege that the sentence is otherwise illegal or unauthorized. </p><p>THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.</p><br>I concur I concur I concur<br>Decision Date: April 20, 2016<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_1_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>
#### JACKSON v. STATE.

No. 17412.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 30, 1935.

J. R. Cornelius, of Sweetwater, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The count of the indictment upon which the conviction is based is that charging that appellant “did then and there unlawfully possess, for the purpose of sale, liquor capable of producing intoxication.”

The indictment is insufficient to charge an offense. The subject is discussed in the case of Offield v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 75 S.W.(2d) 882.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23234]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Appointment of Members of the Legal Division to the Performance 
Review Board, Internal Revenue Service

    Under the authority granted to me as Chief Counsel of the Internal 
Revenue Service by the General Counsel of the Department of the 
Treasury by General Counsel Directive 15, pursuant to the Civil Service 
Reform Act, I have appointed the following persons to the Legal 
Division Performance Review Board, Internal Revenue Service Panel:

1. Eric S. Nguyen, Deputy General Counsel, Department of the Treasury--
Chair
2. Elizabeth P. Askey, Deputy Chief Appeals, Independent Office of 
Appeals (IRS)
3. Melanie R. Krause, Chief Operating Officer, (IRS)
Alternate: Douglas W. O'Donnell, Deputy Commissioner (IRS)

    This publication is required by 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4).

Marjorie A. Rollinson,
Chief Counsel, Internal Revenue Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-23234 Filed 10-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80285]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22682]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 24, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 384 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-740, K2024-33.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22682 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P