alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Mariposa County 

Air Pollution Control District 

July 15, 2014 

Gerardo C. Rios 

CHARLES B. MOSHER, MD, MPH 

HEALTH OFFICER 

AIR POLLUTION CONTROL OFFICER 

Chief, Air Permits Office (Air-3) 

EPA Region 9 

75 Hawthorne Street 

San Francisco, CA 94105 

SUBJECT: 40 CFR Part 51, Appendix S Applicability 

Dear Mr. Rios: 

air@mariposacounty.org 

5100 Bullion Street, Post Office Box 5 

Mariposa, California 95338 

(209) 966-2220 or (888) 777-0377 

FAX (209) 966-8248 

This letter is in response to your request for additional information regarding compliance with the federal 

new source review (NSR) requirements for ozone, in the interim, while requirements consistent with the 

national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone are incorporated into our NSR program. In 

particular, you have asked us to acknowledge the applicability of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 

part 51 , Appendix S to new and modified major sources during the period prior to EPA's approval of a 

NSR program applicable to our ozone non-attainment area. 

As you are aware, the Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District is currently classified as a moderate 

nonattainment area under the 1997 ozone NAAQS and as a marginal nonattainment area under the 2008 

ozone NAAQS. A new NSR program submittal was due to EPA by June 13, .2013 for the 1997 ozone 

NAAQS, while an NSR program revision is due by Jtily 20, 2015· for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. 

Accordingly, we are planning on adopting and submitting the Rule by July 20, 2015. · 

Until EPA takes a final action to approve our NSR program, we acknowledge that the applicable 

requirements of 40 CFR part 51, Appendix S apply to any new major source or major modification of a 

major source, as defmed therein, for sources emitting volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or nitrogen 

oxides (NOx) as ozone precursors. 

Sincerely, 

Charles B. sher, MD, MPH 

Air Pollution Control Officer 

cc: Dave Conway, Environmental Health Manager 

Kevin Cann, Chair of Board of Supervisors
lo This message was sent with high importance. 

Ken Eisenbeis 

from: 

To: 

Cc: 

Subject: 

Attachments: 

Ken Eisenbeis 

E-Mohameed.khan@ee.doe.gov 

Re: New Rules for Gas Furnaces in the Northern areas ? 

Mohameed, Please answer some questions for me. 

Sent: Fri 1/13/2012 8:55 AM 

I am responsible for 8 Apartment Communities in the Midwest area, most of these Units are of the late 1960's/early 1970's 

construction type, so we are faced with furnace replacement on a regular basis. 

With the specs about the gas discharge pipes for a 90% efficient fumace not able to be close to a window are door. How are we 

supposed to Instan these 90% efficient furnaces due to windows and doors being everywhere in apartment buildings? 

Please think about how these buildings are laid out and constructed: They are multi level usually between 2 & 4 stories and units 

are laid out one after another side by side. So the units are stacked on top of each other and lines up one after another from left 

to right. 

Just to get the new PVC flue from the furnace location to the outside provided there is not a window are door out there we would 

have to run through several units to get to the exiting location. If this was new construction that would not be so difficult, however 

after construction it is nearly Impossible and the cost will be astronomical. 

These units do not have basements where the furnace can be Installed otherwise this would not be an issue. 

Me and my company are all about saving energy and natural resources, we have changes tOilets, shower heads, and aerators to 

water saving types in most of our communities and installed florescent and LEO lighting as well with out being forced to do so by 

the Government but this is an unreasonable request 

This is not to mention what the corrosive properties of the condensate water exiting the new Flue pipes is going to do to our roofs 

and gutters if the exit pipes have to empty onto a roof. 

The switch to R410-A refrigerants is hard enough for us to accomplish with out adding yet another huge financial burden like 

these 90% furnace Installations on these Property Management Companies. 

I think this is a great idea for single family houses but not at all feasible for The Multi Family Communities. 

Please help me understand how we are supposed to accomplish this task in our Multi Family Communities. 

Thank You so much in advance! 

Ken Eisenbeis 

Project Manager 

Banner Property Management 

Cell - 314-596-6929 

Fax - 636-255-0071 

ken.eisenbeis@bannerapartments.com 

~ECe'V.,-o ~")::m" ~ 

0'" ,2oJ ..... 12. TowA .. """,,,,, 

T~ '7"'-O~ A~e>->c>1 

NICK Z((..,El-H/~ 3~t; -~~:z..(, 

http://webmail.bannerapartments.com!exchangelken.eisenbeis/Sent%20Items/Re:%20NewOIo20Ruies%20for%20Gas ...
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, James W. Sullivan, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reliance Bancshares, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC Release33-8238; 34-47986];     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: November 14, 2007 By: /s/ James W. Sullivan     Name: James W. Sullivan    Title:  Chief Financial Officer
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Payroll Office Letter

 

Number: P- 99-10 Date: April 1,1999 

Subject: FEDERAL EMPLOYEES HEALTH BENEFITS (FEHB) PROGRAM: 

 TERMINATION HEALTH POWER HMO, CODE XR

 

The purpose of this letter is to advise you that Health Power HMO, Code XR will

no longer be participating in the FEHB Program effective May 1, 1999. Please see

the attached BAL for more details.

If you have any questions please contact us on (202) 606-0606.

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6372

CATHERINE D. RANDOLPH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CLIFTON T. PERKINS HOSPITAL CENTER,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge. 

(1:10-cv-00284-JFM)

Submitted: August 11, 2010 Decided: September 14, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Catherine D. Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Catherine D. Randolph appeals the district court’s 

orders dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice. We 

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district 

court. Randolph v. Clifton T. Perkins Hosp. Ctr., No. 

1:10-cv-00284-JFM (D. Md. Feb. 19, 2010). We deny Randolph’s 

emergency petition for review, as well as her motions for 

appointment of counsel, stay pending appeal, and an expedited 

decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process. 

AFFIRMED
2016 Annual Statement
of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Pooling and
Servicing Agreement (the "Pooling and Servicing Agreement") dated as of September 1, 2012 by and among UBS
Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as Depositor, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association
as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Park Bridge Lender Services LLC as Operating
Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as Trustee, Certificate Administrator, Paying Agent and Custodian relating
to the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C3, Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C3 (UBS-Barclays
2012-C3)

The undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

| | 1. | All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement are performed on behalf of the Special Servicer.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer for the period of
January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016 (the "Reporting Period") in accordance with the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
has been conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
obligations under the terms of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, in all material respects for the Reporting Period and if there
has been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each failure and the nature and status thereof has
been specifically identified herein.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







|Certified by: | /s/ Adam Singer                |  | Date:  March 1, 2017
|------------- | ------------------------------ |  | --------------------
|              | Adam Singer, Managing Director |  |
**Exhibit 34.1**

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 

The Board of Directors 

Cenlar FSB: 

We have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying Management Assessment, that Cenlar FSB (the Company) complied with the servicingcriteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulation AB for the residential mortgage loans platform as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 except for 1122 (d)(1)(iii), which the Company hasdetermined is not applicable to the activities performed by them with respect to the servicing platform covered by this report See Appendix A of Management’s Assessment for the asset backed transactions covered by this platform Management isresponsible for the Company’s compliance with those servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria based on our examination. 

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, as adopted bythe Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the applicable servicing criteria and performing such other procedures as weconsidered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing of less than all of the individual asset backed transactions and securities that comprise the platform, testing of less than all of the servicing activities related to thePlatform and determining whether the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria. Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicingactivities performed by the Company during the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amountscalculated or reported by the Company during the period covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide alegal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria. 

In our opinion, management’s assertion that the Company compliedwith the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014, for the residential mortgage loans platform is fairly stated, in all material respects. 

/s/ Ernst & Young LLP 

February 27, 2015
EXHIBIT 32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunrise Global, Inc. (the
"Company") for the quarter ended January 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer, President, Treasurer, and the principal financial officer of
the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Global,
Inc.





A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:
      February 11, 2009
            /s/
      Shaojun
      SunShaojun
      Sun, Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial
      Officer
Density

Confidential Business Information
AeroUAVs LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

July 31, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request for Amendment to Exemption No. 12153, Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1641 under 

Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations. 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 (the “Reform Act”) and 14 

C.F.R. Part 11, AeroUAVs, LLC (AeroUAVs), seeks to amend exemption No. 12153, Regulatory Docket No. 

FAA–2015–1641; Submitted by AeroUAVs for review April 20, 2015 and subsequently granted by the 

FAA on July 27, 2015. 

The original exemption made a request to allow operations of 12 different Airframe models for:

 Aerial Photography and Videography for the real estate, construction, and utilities industries 

 Agricultural Surveying and Application 

 sUAS Operator Training 

 Product Demonstrations 

 Research and Development

There have been no changes in the request for exemption from specific regulations or conditions and 

reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

This letter requests the addition of additional Airframe models for commercial use in the 

aforementioned service operations. We are petitioning for exemption to enable AeroUAVs to operate 

additional UAS platforms that have been previously approved by exemption or currently under review. 

Namely: 

 F450 - Exemption 11974

 DJI S800 - Exemption 11721 

 3DRobotics IRIS+ - Exemption 11419

 3DRobotics Solo - Exemption 12174 & Exemption 12078

 Yuneec Q500 - Exemption 11842 & Exemption 12077 

 SenseFly eBee - Exemption 11263

 X PlusOne - Docket ID FAA-2015-2092
AeroUAVs LLC 11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353 Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

These sUAS all weigh less than 55 lbs, have a built- in capability to limit the height flown above the 

ground, to limit the radius of the distance it flies from the operator and to exclude it from Class B, C and 

D airspace including a no fly zone feature. Each system also has the failsafe function of the autopilot 

system, which means when the communication between the Main Controller and the transmitter is lost, 

the system will automatically trigger Return to Home and will land safely.

This submission does not include the Operating Manuals for the first 4 models requested above, as they 

have been reviewed by the Administrator in granting previous exemptions. Model specifics are listed in 

the AeroUAVs Operating Manual which is included with this submission. Copies of all Operating Manuals 

for the individual models listed will be submitted on request.

Accompanying this submission electronically via e-mail are a copies of the AeroUAVs Operations Manual 

and the AeroUAVs Training Manual submitted to 333exemptions@faa.gov. 

Regards,

Timothy Ford

President and CEO

AeroUAVs, LLC

11523 Palmbrush Trail Suite 353

Lakewood Ranch, FL 34202

(314) 397-1110
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  (i)
    
    the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: November 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Richard S. DavisRichard S. DavisExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Arden Realty, Inc.




---



##### 



Certification of Chief Operating Officer
  (i)
    
    the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: November 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Victor J. ColemanVictor J. ColemanPresident and
Chief Operating Officer
Arden Realty, Inc.




---



##### 



Certification of Executive Vice President
  (i)
    
    the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: November 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Robert C. PeddicordRobert C. PeddicordExecutive Vice President,
Leasing and Property Operations
Arden Realty, Inc.




---



##### 



Certification of Senior Vice President
  (i)
    
    the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
period ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
 Date: November 9, 2005
    By:
    /s/ David A. SwartzDavid A. SwartzSenior Vice President, General Counsel and
Secretary
Arden Realty, Inc.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

AMEER ALGHUSAIN,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

JASON L. NEMETH; et al.,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 21

- 15110

D.C. No. 5:20

- cv

- 05175

- BLF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 20, 2021 * *

Before: THOMAS, Chief Judge, TASHIMA and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

Ameer Alghusain appeals pro se from the district court’s order denying his

motion for a preliminary injunction in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arising out of

injuries Alghusain sustained i n Ohio. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1292(a)(1). We review for an abuse of discretion. Jackson v. City & County of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 29 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 21

- 15110

San Francisco , 746 F.3d 953, 958 (9th Cir. 2014). We affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Alghusain’s motion

for a preliminary injunction because Alghusain failed to establish that he is likely

to succeed on the merits of his claim s. See id. (plaintiff seeking preliminary

injunction mu st establish that he is likely to succeed on the merits, he is likely to

suffer irreparable harm in the absence of preliminary relief, the balance of equities

tips in his favor, and an injunction is in the public interest).

We reject as without merit A lghusain’s contentions that the district court

was required to grant his motion because it was unopposed and that the district

court should have granted Alghusain an opportunity to file an amended motion.

AFFIRMED.