alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code), John R. Schwab, Chief Financial Officer of NCO Group, Inc. (the Company) does hereby certify with respect to the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008
(the Report) that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |                                        |  | 
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2008 |  | /s/ John R. Schwab                     |  | 
|                        |  | John R. Schwab Chief Financial
Officer |  | 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Tim Foote and Keith Cypert

, * From the 50 th District Court

of Knox County,

Trial Court No. 9943

Vs. No. 11

- 20

- 00 028

- C V * January 20, 2022

Texcel Exploration, Inc. * Opinion by Bailey

, C. J.

and Tommy Decker, (P anel consists of: Bailey , C.J.,

Trotter , J. , and W illiams, J.)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opi nion,

the judgment of the tr ia l court is in all things affirmed. The costs incurred by

reason of this appeal are taxed against Tim Foote and Keith Cypert.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Robert R. Binns, certifythat:

 

1.     I have reviewed thisquarterly report on Form 10-Q of Global Aviation Holdings Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, thisreport does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit tostate a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, thefinancial statements, and other financial information included in this report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)            designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)           evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)            disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation ofinternal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):

 

a)            all significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)           any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date: November 24,  2010 | By:    | /s/ Robert R. Binns |
|------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                               |   | Robert R. Binns          |
|                               |   | Chief Executive Officer  |

 

----
June 7, 2016

Mr. James H. Williams

Manager

Unmanned Aircraft Systems Integration Office

AFS

- 80

800 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20591

Dear Mr. Williams:

Enclosed please find an exemption application filed on behalf of Northeast Iowa Community College under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11 to allow commercial operations of unmanned aircraft for precision aeri al survey.

Should your staff or you have any questions, please contact the undersigned.

Very truly yours,

Tad Mueller

Enclosures
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Long Term 

Care Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 03-310 Date: October 15, 2003 

Subject: 2004 FEHB Withholdings and Contribution Rates 

This letter transmits the official FEHB withholdings and contribution rates for 2004. These are the 

only rates that agency payroll providers should use to update their systems and are effective for pay 

periods beginning after December 31, 2003. 

The FEHB withholdings and contribution rates are available in ASCII, DBF, and Excel file formats. 

If you are a subscriber to "FINPAY" listserv, you will receive all three files. If you are not a 

FINPAY subscriber and want these files, please email us at finance@opm.gov, using “Want FEHB 

Rates” as the subject. We will email you the three rate files. 

With the implementation of the FEHB Centralized Enrollment Clearinghouse (CLER) system, we 

will no longer provide the FEHB carrier contact information for enrollment reconciliation purposes. 

Payroll providers should obtain carrier contact information from the CLER website at 

https://www.nfc.usda.gov/cler/index2.asp. 

If you have questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov. 

You may call us on 202-606-0606. 

Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

 Financial Policy Group 

 Center for Financial Services
PAYROLL OFFICE LETTER

U. S. Office of Personnel Management

Number: P-99-09 Date: March 8, 1999

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program:

Termination of HIP Health Plan of Pennsylvania, Code 5J

This is to inform you that HIP Health Plan of Pennsylvania, Code 5J, will no longer participate in the FEHB

Program after April 30, 1999. This will impact agencies with employees in the Philadelphia area and Bucks,

Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties of Pennsylvania where the plan provides coverage.

This information was forwarded to agency benefits officers in Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) 99-403,

dated March 1, 1999. It can also be located on the Internet at http://www.opm.gov/asd. Please reference the

BAL for details on the special open season agencies were authorized to offer to employees covered by the plan. 

Please do not process any new enrollments for plan 5J and work with your personnel office to ensure that all

employees enrolled in plan 5J are transferred to a new plan. If you have any questions regarding the

termination of Health Power HMO, please address them with your agency’s Health Benefits Officer.

 Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Attachment
United States

Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 99-403 Date: March 1, 1999 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Termination of HIP Health Plan of

Pennsylvania, Code 5J

This is to advise you that HIP Health Plan of Pennsylvania, Code 5J, an HMO serving the Philadelphia area and

Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties, is going out of business and will no longer participate in

the FEHB Program after April 30, 1999.

Employees may not newly enroll in HIP of Pennsylvania. In addition, we are authorizing a special open season

for employees enrolled in the plan to allow them to choose new plans. Employees who wish to maintain FEHB

coverage must enroll in new plans during this special open season. 

HIP of Pennsylvania will send its enrollees a letter on OPM stationery advising them of this special open

season. The letter, which enrollees are instructed to present to their personnel offices, explains that the open

season is effective immediately and will continue for 30 days from the date of the letter. (However, agencies are

asked to apply this cut-off date liberally if necessary.)

Because the plan will cease operations in the middle of a pay period, enrollment changes made during this

special open season should be made effective as of the first day of the last pay period in April (April 25 for

employees paid biweekly), but no later than May 1, 1999. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Abbey Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION

I, W. W. Boisture, Jr., principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes
Company (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 29, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. W. Boisture, Jr.                                                   
|W. W. Boisture, Jr., Chief Executive Officer (Principal
Executive Officer)

July 15, 2009
Filed 2/12/15 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2015 ND 30

Edward Waslaski, Jr., Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140245

Appeal from the District Court of Pembina County, Northeast Judicial District, the Honorable M. Richard Geiger, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Rhiannon L. Gorham, P.O. Box 6306, Grand Forks, N.D. 58206-6306, for petitioner and appellant; on brief.

Stephenie L. Davis, McKenzie County Assistant State’s Attorney, 201 Fifth Street NW, Suite 550, Watford City, N.D. 58854, for respondent and appellee; on brief.

Waslaski v. State

No. 20140245

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Edward Waslaski appeals from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief.  Waslaski claims he is entitled to post-conviction relief because his counsel represented his co-defendants and advised him to plead guilty to multiple charges to ensure a better outcome for the group of defendants rather than for his individual interests.  Waslaski previously sought post-conviction relief in Waslaski v. State, 2013 ND 56, 828 N.W.2d 787.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding that, following an evidentiary hearing, the district court did not err in dismissing on the grounds of misuse of process Waslaski’s application for post-conviction relief.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Daniel J. Crothers

Lisa Fair McEvers

Carol Ronning Kapsner
**EXHIBIT 32**

** **

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350 AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Show Me Ethanol, LLC (the “Company”) for the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned General Manager and the Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 

- The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 
- The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date:  November 16, 2009

 

By: /s/ Richard A. Hanson                                

Name:  Richard A. HansonTitle:    General Manager

 

By: /s/ Richard A. Hanson                                

Name:  Richard A. HansonTitle:    Chief Financial Officer

 

 

----
##### 



T-3 Energy Services, Inc. Announces Successful Sales Execution
of its Strategic Wellhead and Production Systems Initiative
      http://www.t3energy.com




---



##### 



CONTACT:
    
    T-3 Energy Services, Inc.Michael T. Mino, Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer713-996-4110mmino@t3es.com
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JU NE 8, 2016

NO. 03

- 15

- 00307

- CR

Randy Lin Ates, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 427TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, GO ODWIN, AN D FIELD

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PURYEAR

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order denying DNA testing

. Having reviewed the record

,

the Court hol ds that there was no reversible error in the order

. Therefore, the Court affirms the

trial court’s order denying DNA testing

. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs,

no adjudication of costs is made.
#### RUSTON DRILLING COMPANY, Relator, v. James V. ALLRED, Atty. Gen., of Texas, Respondent.

No. 1517—1755—6644.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Sections A and B.

April 18, 1934.

Davidson, Blalock & Blalock and Myron 6. Blalock, all of Marshall, for relator.

James V. Allred, Atty. Gen., and Homer C. DeWolfe, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.

SMEDLEY, Commissioner.

This is a companion case to Rhoads Drilling Co. et al. v. James V. Allred, Attorney General, 70 S.W.(2d) 576, this day. decided. Relator is the owner of an oil and gas lease covering a certain tract in the bed of the Sabine river, and identical in date and terms, except the description of the area leased, with the leases involved in that case. Respondent declined to approve a supplemental contract executed by the board of mineral development and relator on July 1, 1933, containing substantially the same recitals, terms, and conditions as those contained in the supplemental contract in that case construed. The pleadings present similar facts and the briefs the same questions.

The writ of mandamus will issue in accordance with the prayer of relator’s petition, and directing approval of . the contract as of July 1, 1933. ' ' . -

Adopted by the Supreme Court April 18, 1934.
#### NEW AMSTERDAM CASUALTY CO. v. KELLER.

No. 12865.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

June 17, 1933.

Rehearing Denied July 22, 1933.

Weeks, Morrow & Francis, of Wichita Falls, for appellant.

E. W. Napier, of Wichita Falls, for appel-lee.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

Appellee sues under the Workmen’s Compensation Law (Rev. St. 1925, art. 8306 et seq.) for receiving a hernia.

While working on September 20, 1929, he felt a sharp pain in his groin. The next day he went to Dr. Leake, to whom he had been instructed to go in ease of injury. Dr. Leake, he says, told him he had received a strain but not a hernia, and he continued to work suffering pain regularly. He bought and used a suspensory and truss, but the latter pained him so he did not wear it regularly. In October, 1930, he again was examined at his own request by Dr. Leake, who told him he had a serious hernia and could not be well again without an operation. He says this was his first knowledge that he had a hernia; that Dr. Leake agreed then, October, 1930, to see about getting his compensation for him under the Workmen’s Compensation Law. He saw Dr. Leake about town (Burkburnett, a small town) frequently, but never mentioned the matter of compensation to him again. Dr. Leake removed from Burkburnett in July, 1931. Appellee continued working until after October, 1931.

Appellee gave notice of his injury and claim for compensation on October 14, 1931, and prior to that date no knowledge of the claim for compensation or of the injuries had been received by either the employer or the insurer unless the knowledge of Rhine, the foreman for the employer, or the knowledge of Dr. Leake, is sufficient. Rhine did not know that appellee had received a compensable injury, and Dr. Leake testified he never was in the employ of either the insurer or the employer, Fresno Oil Company. Appellee had before this made application for and received compensation for injuries received on previous occasions.

The jury found that appellee sustained a hernia on September 20, 1929; that disability thereunder arose on said date; that he sustained 25 per cent, disability which will continue until operated on; that he exercised ordinary care in filing his claim for compensation. The court on motion set aside the finding that disability arose on September 20, 1929, and rendered judgment for appellee for compensation.

In the view we take of the case it is unnecessary to decide the law questions involved in the failure to give notice of his injuries prior to October, 1930. He knew of the facts and had actual knowledge of his rights on that last date. Even if we assume, and we do not, that he was justified in relying, on October 14, 1930, on Dr. Leake to act for him in obtaining his compensation, still he cannot *638continue for ar year to see nothing done about the matter, never remind Leake or inquire whether the notice was given or what the progress of his claim was, and now expect the courts to reward his laches. No “good cause” was shown under article 8307, § 4a, R. S.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and here rendered that appellee take nothing by his suit.
#### Benjamin Ackman et al., Doing Business as Ackman Brothers, Plaintiffs, *v.*Toren, Inc., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 21, 1958.

*Joseph Howard Katz*and *Adolph Bangser*for plaintiffs.

*Louis M. Bornstein*for defendant.

Samuel H. Horstadter, J.

The defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. It appears from the complaint that after the plaintiffs, licensed real estate brokers, had, pursuant to employment by the defendant to procure a purchaser of certain premises or a purchaser with lease back on terms to be agreed upon, interested a group with whom negotiations were pending, the defendant and the plain*802tiffs on December 7,, 1955, by letter entered into a 'written agreement. The critical- clause of this agreement annexed to the complaint- provides that if the transaction with the group mentioned is not consummated and the defendant sells *“*the property within the- next- five years, to another purchaser through another broker, we undertake nevertheless, to pay to, you the sum of $25,00.0-, as your fee,’-’ The. complaint alleges-, a sale and conveyance of the premise^ to a purchaser for $3,000,0.00: on March 13, 1956, hut does not, state that- this sale was: made, through another broker. This omission is asserted: to he fatal to- the sufficiency of the complaint. I. think not. It would be utterly unreasonable to reacf the agreement as "binding the defendant to pay the plaintiffs if in the sale it. incurred the expense of an additional brokerage commission, "hut imposing no such duty if the defendant was able to make the sale without the intervention of a broker and thereby avoid the added expense. The purpose seems rather to assure the plaintiffs compensation,, notwithstanding that the sale was effected through another broker. Since the, agreement is at least susceptible. of this interpretation, it should not he held, as matter of law, that it must be given the construction advocated "by the defendant, that unless the sale was made through a "broker the defendant assumed no obligation to pay the plaintiffs. The authorities hold uniformly that an interpretation which leads, to an unreasonable or unjust result is to be avoided, unless the language of the agreement unmistakably so requires. *(Pioneer Credit Corp.*v. *Sam Miguel,*275 App. Div. 636, 638; *Fleischmam*v, *Furgueson,*223. N. Y, 235, 2 41.) The rule is applicable here.

The motion is denied with leave to answer within 10 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry.
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Registrant. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:  May 12, 2011 |                                         |   |
|-------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|--------|
|                          |                                         |   |
|                          | /s/ Steven G. Wollach                        |   |
|                          | Steven G. Wollach                            |   |
|                          | Chief Financial Officer                      |   |
|                          | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |

----