alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COMMON RETIREMENT PLANS AND CORRESPONDING CODES

Code NAME/EXPLANATION COMMENTS

1 Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) 

2 Social Security System (FICA) 

4 None 

6 Civil Service Retirement System—

Special (CSRS—Special) For law enforcement officers and firefighters. 

C FICA and CSRS (Partial) 

CSRS Offset. Full deductions are withheld for 

FICA, and partial deductions are withheld for 

CSRS. 

E FICA and CSRS—Special (Partial) 

CSRS Offset for law enforcement officers and 

firefighters. Full deductions are withheld for 

FICA, and partial deductions are withheld for 

CSRS—Special. 

K 

Federal Employees’ Retirement System 

(FERS) and FICA 

L FERS and FICA—Air Traffic Controllers 

M FERS and FICA—Special For law enforcement officers and firefighters. 

N FERS and FICA—Reserve Technicians 

R FICA and CSRS (Full) Full deductions are withheld for FICA, and 

full deductions are withheld for CSRS. 

Reference: The Guide to Personnel Data Standards, Update 11, 3/00 

1
Exhibit 35.1



|     |  |                                                                                                              
|---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor 550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202 1-800-326-1334
|    
|    
|    
|    

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of September 1, 2012, by and among Citigroup Commercial
Mortgages Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as Operating Advisor, Citibank, N.A., as
Certificate Administrator and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2012-GC8 (the Agreement). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the
meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.08 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice President of
Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the Reporting Period), and of its performance per the Agreement during such
period has been made under my supervision, and
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | -- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of
March 2015.



|                        
|------------------------
|LOGO                    
|                        
|Daniel Bober            
|Executive Vice President
|Wells Fargo Bank        



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
Exhibit 10.7
 RENEGY HOLDINGS, INC.

2007 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
(As Amended and Restated February 5, 2008)
 NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS
 Exhibit A
 Participant:Address:
  Grant NumberDate of GrantVesting Commencement DateNumber of Restricted Stock Units
 Vesting Schedule




---



##### 



PARTICIPANT
    
    
    
    RENEGY HOLDINGS, INC.Signature
    
    
    
    ByPrint Name
    
    
    
    TitleAddress:
  -2-




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A   TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT
 Grant
 Companys Obligation to Pay 1 2
 Vesting Schedule
 Administrator Discretion
  -3-




---



##### 



Forfeiture upon Termination of Status as a Service Provider
 Death of Participant
 Withholding of Taxes
 Rights as Stockholder
 No Guarantee of Continued Service
  -4-




---



##### 



Address for Notices
 Grant is Not Transferable
 Binding Agreement
 Additional Conditions to Issuance of Stock
 Plan Governs
 Administrator Authority
  -5-




---



##### 



Electronic Delivery
 Captions
 Agreement Severable
 Modifications to the Agreement
 Amendment, Suspension or Termination of the Plan
 Governing Law
  -6-
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-7774

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus RODNEY CURTIS HAMRICK, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., District Judge. (CR-91-56, CA-99-90-5) Submitted: February 21, 2002 Decided: March 5, 2002 Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Rodney Curtis Hamrick, Appellant Pro Se. David Jonathan Horne, Special Assistant United States Attorney, Dayton, Ohio; David EarlGodwin, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Rodney Curtis Hamrick seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and findno reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Hamrick , Nos. CR-91-56; CA-99-90-5 (N.D.W. Va. Sept. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23307]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open Meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer 
Advocacy Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Tuesday, November 12, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or 
(718) 834-2203.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. app. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Notices and 
Correspondence Project Committee will be held Tuesday, November 12, 
2024, at 11:00 a.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral 
comments or submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited 
time and structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate 
must be made with Robert Rosalia. For more information, please contact 
Robert Rosalia at 1-888-912-1227 or (718) 834-2203, or write TAP 
Office, 2 Metrotech Center, 100 Myrtle Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11201 or 
contact us at the website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will 
include TAP 2024 committee project focus areas.

    Dated: October 1, 2024.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2024-23307 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
#### WHITE v. STATE.

No. 15643.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

L. M. Cox, of Huntsville, for appellant. ,

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State,

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for burglary; punishment,seven years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record no bills of exception. A number of exceptions were taken to the charge of the court and appear to have been filed with the clerk of said court, but same are not approved as having been properly presented to the trial court and cannot be by us considered. Appellant asked a special charge, which was refused by the court, and we find no exception nor objection to this action of the court. There is in the record no statement of facts.

The judgment will be affirmed.
#### MOORE v. STATE.

No. 16268.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 24, 1934.

Robertson & Murchison, of Haskell, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for transportation of intoxicating liquor, the punishment assessed at sixteen months in the penitentiary.

Appellant entered his plea of guilty, under which the state introduced the testimony of officers showing the transportation, also a confession of appellant made to the prosecuting attorney. Appellant testified himself admitting all facts necessary to show guilt

A plea in bar of the prosecution was filed averring that appellant had been required to appear before the grand jury and there give evidence regarding the very offense for which he was on trial. He claimed immunity under article 694, P. C. The bill of exception relating to the matter is qualified by the trial judge, and shows that appellant appeared before the grand jury voluntarily; that he was properly warned, and thereafter voluntarily made a statement which was reduced to writing, but which, however, was not used against him on the trial. The facts do not bring said article 694 into operation. Medlock v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 274, 1 S.W.(2d) 308; Blanks v. State, 111 Tex. Cr. R. 614, 13 S.W.(2d) 373, and cases therein cited.

Appellant also complains that the trial court, over objection, permitted witnesses for the state to testify that his general reputation as a peaceable and law-abiding citizen was bad. Appellant had filed his application for a suspended sentence, and introduced proof in support thereof. The filing of the plea placed appellant’s reputation in issue, and the evidence complained of was properly received. Long v. State, 120 Tex. Cr. R. 373, 48 S.W.(2d) 632; Whitlock v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 58 S.W.(2d) 109.

Other bills of exception register complaint because of certain questions asked appellant on cross-examination. The bills do not disclose what the answers were, and for that reason are obviously insufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Christian Mancillas, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Rosca, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
5th day of November, 2007.


/s/ Christian Mancillas
---------------------------
Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on Form S-4 of our report dated March 15,2007 (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to a change in the method of accounting for defined benefit pensionand other postretirement plans as of December 31, 2006) relating to the financial statements ofSterling Chemicals, Inc. appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.We also consent to the reference to us under the headings “Experts” in such Prospectus. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Houston, Texas August28, 2007
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6276

GUY WILLIAM BILODEAU,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia

Department of Corrections,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. William T. Prince, Magistrate Judge.

(CA-98-626)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Guy William Bilodeau, Appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells,

Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Guy William Bilodeau appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 1999).

Bilodeau’s case was referred to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (1994). The magistrate judge recommended

that relief be denied and advised Bilodeau that the failure to file

timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate

review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

Despite this warning, Bilodeau failed to object to the magistrate

judge’s recommendation.

The timely filing of objections to a magistrate judge’s

recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the

substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned

that failure to object will waive appellate review. See Wright v.

Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); United States v.

Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 93-94 (4th Cir. 1984); see also Thomas v.

Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). Bilodeau has waived appellate review by

failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. We accordingly deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0185

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM001AD

A300-57-0249, R01 --- 12/19/07

A300-57-0249 --- 5/22/07

A300-57-6106, R02 --- 6/18/10

A300-57-6106, R01 --- 1/28/08

A300-57-6106 --- 5/22/07

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit 32



Certification

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the

Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report
of Yongye International, Inc. (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



(1)           the
Report fully complies, in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934; and



(2)           the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



|By: | /s/ Zishen Wu                   | 
|--- | ------------------------------- | 
|    | Name: Zishen Wu                
|    | Title:  Chief Executive Officer
|    | August 9, 2012                 
|    |                                
|By: | /s/ Sam Yu                      | 
|    | Name: Sam Yu                   
|    | Title:  Chief Financial Officer
|    | August 9, 2012                 



A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company
and will be furnished to the SEC or its staff upon request.  This exhibit is not “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 but is instead furnished as provided by applicable rules of the SEC.
EXHIBIT 32.1   CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hotcloud Mobile, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for quarter ended April 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David Bleeden, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company   Date: June 20, 2011  /s/ David BleedenDavid Bleeden
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
C HIEF J USTICE

C AROLYN W RIGHT

J USTICES

D AVID L. B RIDGES

M OLLY F RANCIS

D OUGLAS S. L ANG

E LIZABETH L ANG

- M IERS

R OBERT M. F ILLMORE

L

ANA M YERS

D AVID E VANS

D AVID L EWIS

A DA B ROW N

C RAIG S TODDART

B ILL W HITEHILL

D AVID J. S CHENCK 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

600 C OMMERCE S TREET

, S UITE 200

D ALLAS

, T EXAS 75202

(214) 712

- 3400 L ISA M ATZ

CLERK OF THE COURT

(214) 712

- 3450

lisa.matz@ 5th.txcourts.gov

G AYLE H UMPA

BUSINESS ADMINISTRAT OR

(214) 712

- 3434

gayle.humpa@ 5th.txcourts.gov

F ACSIMILE

(214) 745

- 1083

I NTERNET

HTTP :// 5 TH

. TXCOURTS

. GOV



# July 9, 2015

S. Vance Wittie

Sedgwick LLP

1717 Main Street, Suite 5400

Dallas, TX 75201

- 7367

Charles W. Gameros Jr.

Hoge & Gameros, LLP

4514 Cole Avenue, Suite 1500

Dallas, TX 75202

- 4220

Re: Dallas Drain Company, Inc. and Kevin Travis v. Kevin D. Welsh and Kelly A. Welsh

Case # 05

- 14

- 00831

- CV

Dear Attorneys:

Enclosed is a corrected page for the above

- mentioned case. Please note th e following typographical

error, which has been corrected:

Cover page, second line, replace the word appellees with appellants.

Please replace the cover page of your previous copy with the enclosed.

Sincerely,

/s/ Lisa Matz

Lisa Matz

Clerk of the Court

cc: Trial court judge

Trial court cl erk
5. **Remedies**.(a) Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default specified in Section 4(a), Payee may, bywritten notice to Maker, declare this Note to be due and payable, whereupon the principal amount ofthis Note, and all other amounts payable hereunder, shall become immediately due and payablewithout presentment, demand, protest or other notice of any kind, all of which are hereby expresslywaived, anything contained herein or in the documents evidencing the same to the contrarynotwithstanding.(b) Upon the occurrence of an Event of Default specified in Sections 4(b) and 4(c), the unpaidprincipal balance of, and all other sums payable with regard to, this Note shall automatically andimmediately become due and payable, in all cases without any action on the part of Payee.6. **Unconditional Liability**. Maker hereby waives all notices in connection with the delivery,acceptance, performance, default, or enforcement of the payment of this Note, and agrees that itsliability shall be unconditional, without regard to the liability of any other party, and shall notbe affected hereunder in any manner by any indulgence, extension of time, renewal, waiver ormodification granted or consented to by Payee, and consents to any and all extensions of time,renewals, waivers, or modifications that may be granted by Payee with respect to the payment orother provisions of this Note.7. **Notices**. Any notice called for hereunder shall be deemed properly given if (i) sent bycertified mail, return receipt requested, (ii) personally delivered, (iii) dispatched by any formof private or governmental express mail or delivery service providing receipted delivery, (iv) sentby facsimile or (v) sent by e-mail, to the following addresses or to such other address as eitherparty may designate by notice in accordance with this Section:If to Maker:TM Entertainment and Media, Inc.
Attachment B 

COST FACTORS - FERS 

CATEGORY 2000 

COST FACTOR (%) 

Regular 11.5 

Law enforcement officers 24.6 

Air traffic controllers 23.1 

Members of Congress 16.5 

Congressional employees 16.7 

Military reserve technicians 11.9