alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
  
 PHI, Inc.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
 
 Louisiana(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    0-9827(Commission File Number)
    
    72-0395707(IRS Employer Identification
Number)
 2001 SE Evangeline Thruway, Lafayette, Louisiana(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    70508(Zip Code)
 (800) 235-2452  (Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02.      Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   Item 9.01.      Financial Statements and Exhibits
  Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release of PHI, Inc. dated August 9, 2007, announcing earnings for second
quarter 2007.
 SIGNATURE
  PHI, Inc.Date: August 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/  Michael J. McCannName:
    Michael J. McCannTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



99.1
    
    Press Release of PHI, Inc. dated August 9, 2007, announcing earnings for second
quarter 2007.
Exhibit 32

OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officers of the Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended September 30, 2010 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                        |  |                                      
|----------------------- |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Ronald O. Black                  
|                        |  | Ronald O. Black                      
|                        |  | President and Chief Executive Officer
|                        | 
|Date: November 12, 2010 |  | /s/ Thomas W. Wayne                  
|                        |  | Thomas W. Wayne                      
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer              



|* | This certification is made solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
|- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



36
Dear Sir or Madam,

I run a company called High Flying Images (www.highflyingimages.com) which operates UAS within Europe and now in the USA. Our current aerial system in the USA is a DJI Inspire 1 which we would like to operate within the New Jersey area for aerial photography of real estate. I have many years of safe flying of RC aircrafts and safety is always our upmost priority. We would like to be considered for an exemption under the current FAA 333 r uling. Please let me know if I have not provided enough information or you would like more details
Best regards, Jeremy Ryan
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6372** 

CATHERINE D. RANDOLPH , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. CLIFTON T. PERKINS HOSPITAL CENTER , Defendant

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland , at Baltimore
. J. Frederick Motz , District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00284

- JFM )

Submitted : August 11, 2010 Decided: September 14, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opi nion
. Catherine D. Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Catherine D. Randolph appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her civil complaint without prejudice
. We have reviewe d the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Randolph v. Clifton T. Perkins Hosp . Ctr. , No. 1:10

- cv - 00284

- JFM (D. Md. Feb. 19, 2010). We deny Randolph’s emergency petition for review, as well as her motions for appointment of counsel, stay pending appeal, and an expedited decision. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid t he decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 31.2**CERTIFICATIONS**I, Marc Kilbride, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of CenterPoint Energy Transition BondCompany II, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the caseof an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.        Date:      March 29, 2007 /s/ Marc Kilbride   Marc Kilbride   Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer)
**Exhibit 32**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of Southern Bella, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s
      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
      (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ,
      as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
      condition and results of operation of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/
                Viola HeitzViola Heitz, President, Chief Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer and Director
### Regulatory Evaluation 

# QO l

# s-- C

# E- 

# o 'l 

# ¥-t-1 

# o Docket No. 

### FAA- Directorate Identifier: 

### __.w



## if

you make changes to the values in the table below. you must ensure the totals upd ate accordingly. 

### (l they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell. Estimated Costs: Action Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, (e.g., Inspection, propeller, appliance) Work-hours Labor Parts Cost Total Costs Number of Total Cost replacement) (include cost (labor + 

## u.s. for U.S. Fleet Do not include on- condition costs here access, testing, (@$85/b parts) Registered and close-up) our)
_ Products 

### Inspection Only 

### 2.0 $0 

### 195 t • II



### '

,

' '



# . ,I ' /'. 

## .. I The known number 

### ofproducts in compliance: Total Costs 

### ofcompliance for U.S. fleet: $33,150 Costs covered under warranty (ifknown) $ On-Condition Costs: Action Work-hours Labor cost Parts Cost Cost per Product (e.g., Inspection, (include access, (@$85/bour) testing, and close- replacement) up) 

### Repair type I 15.0 $250 

# . Repair type 2 30.0 $400 

### Repair type 3 38.0 $400 

### Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this fieldto explain anything in the Estimated Costs table that was assumedor might notbe obvious. This field can also be usedto explain warranty costs):Executive Order 12866: 

### Could the AD beconsidered a "significant regulatory action"? 

# G YES* 

# D N0[8] *Explanation: DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures: 

### Is the AD significant? 

# G YES*0 

### N0[8] *Explanation: Regulatory Flexibility Act: 

### Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number ofsmall entities? Explain for either a Yes or No answer. 

# 0 YESO 

### NO[g] Explanation: Intrastate Aviation in Alaska: 

### This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode oftransportation? 

## @ YES*0

**NO~** 

### *Explanation:
**Exhibit 31.1****SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Charles E. Ramey, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10- KSB of US Dataworks, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this annual report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this annual report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this annual report based on such evaluation;c) disclosed in this annual report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial data; andb) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: June 29, 2007       /s/ Charles E. RameyCharles E. Ramey,Chief Executive Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3457 

To prohibit the lifting of sanctions on Iran until the Government of Iran 

pays the judgments against it for acts of terrorism, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 

Mr. MEEHAN (for himself, Mrs. WALORSKI, and Mr. DUFFY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

A BILL 

To prohibit the lifting of sanctions on Iran until the Government of Iran pays the judgments against it for acts 

of terrorism, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Justice for Victims 

5 of Iranian Terrorism Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON LIFTING OF SANCTIONS ON IRAN 

7 PENDING PAYMENT OF CERTAIN JUDG8 MENTS. 

9 (a) IN GENERAL.—The President may not waive, 

10 suspend, reduce, provide relief from, or otherwise limit the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3457 IH

1 application of statutory sanctions with respect to Iran 

2 under any provision of law, or refrain from applying any 

3 such sanctions pursuant to an agreement described in sec4 tion 135(a) of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 (42 U.S.C. 

5 2160e(a)), until the President has certified to the Con6 gress that the Government of Iran has paid each judgment 

7 against Iran (whether or not the judgment was also en8 tered against another defendant) that is described in sub9 section (b). 

10 (b) JUDGMENTS.—A judgment is a judgment de11 scribed in this subsection if the judgment relates to a 

12 claim— 

13 (1) that was brought against Iran, or Iran and 

14 any other country; 

15 (2) for which Iran was not immune from the ju16 risdiction of the courts of the United States under 

17 section 1605A, or section 1605(a)(7) (as such sec18 tion was in effect on January 27, 2008), of title 28, 

19 United States Code; and 

20 (3) that was entered during the period begin21 ning on March 4, 2000, and ending on May 22, 

22 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 3.2
 COMPANY AGREEMENT
OF
TE PRODUCTS PIPELINE COMPANY, LLC
 Agreement Company TEPPCO GP MLP TLLCL
 ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS




---



##### 



ARTICLE II
ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS
 Formation Certificate
 Name
 Registered Office; Principal Office
 -2-




---



##### 



Term
 Certificate of Formation
 ARTICLE III
PURPOSE
 Purpose and Business
 Powers
 ARTICLE IV
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS
 Prior Contributions
 -3-




---



##### 



Additional Contributions
 Return of Contributions; Other Provisions Relating to Contributions.
 Loans.
 ARTICLE V
CAPITAL ACCOUNTS; ALLOCATIONS; DISTRIBUTIONS
 Capital Accounts
 Allocations for Tax and Capital Account Purposes
 Distributions
 ARTICLE VI
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS OF BUSINESS
  -4-




---



##### 



ARTICLE VII
RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF MEMBERS
  ARTICLE VIII
WINDING UP AND TERMINATION
 provided,
however
 ARTICLE IX
AMENDMENT OF COMPANY AGREEMENT
  ARTICLE X
INDEMNIFICATION
 Indemnification
 Indemnitee provided
 -5-




---



##### 



-6-




---



##### 



Liability of Indemnitees
    ARTICLE XI
BOOKS AND RECORDS
  ARTICLE XII
GENERAL PROVISIONS
 Addresses and Notices
 Titles and Captions
 -7-




---



##### 



Pronouns and Plurals
 Binding Effect
 Integration
 Creditors.
 Waiver.
 Applicable Law
 Invalidity of Provisions
 Counterparts
 * * * Remainder of this page intentionally left blank * * *
 -8-




---



##### 



MEMBERS:
TEPPCO GP, INC.By:
    /s/ William G. ManiasName:
    William G. ManiasTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerTEPPCO PARTNERS, L.P.By:
    Texas Eastern Products Pipeline Company, LLC,its sole general partnerBy:
    /s/ William G. ManiasName:
    William G. ManiasTitle:
    Vice President and Chief Financial Officer -9-
#### MASSAD et al. v. SAYRE OIL CORPORATION.

No. 8741.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

May 4, 1938.

Saye & Saye, of Longview, for appellants.

Weeks, Hankerson & Potter, of Tyler, for appellee.

McClendon, chief justice.

This is a rule 37 case. The appeal is from an interlocutory order overruling a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction enjoining the drilling of a second well upon a 2.2-acre tract in the East Texas Oil field. The suit in which the injunction was issued was to set aside ah order' of the Commission granting a permit to drill the well as an exception to rule 37 in order to “prevent confiscation of property.”

The injunction was granted ex parte and without notice or hearing, upon the filing of the verified petition. It was therefore void under R.C.S. art. 6049c, § 10, as amended March 6, 1935, by H. B. No. 403, Gen.Laws 44th Leg., p. 74, ch. 28, § 1, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 6049c.

The Commission was not made a party to the motion to dissolve; and, so far as the record shows, was not notified of and did not appear at the hearing. Under the amendment therefore the court was without jurisdiction to,continue the injunction in effect by overruling the motion. The proper order upon the motion would have been to dissolve the injunction, and set the original application therefor for hearing, giving to all parties, including the Commission, reasonable notice of such hearing. See opinion in L. P. & B. Oil Corporation v. Gulf Oil Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 1034.

The order appealed from is set aside and the temporary injunction is dissolved, without prejudice.

Order set aside; temporary injunction dissolved.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Daniel A. Carr, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer of Mount Knowledge Holdings, Inc. (the Company) hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the
      three month period ended July 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                               



|Dated: September 17, 2010 | By: | /s/ Daniel A. Carr                                      
|------------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------------------
|                          |     | Daniel A. Carr                                          
|                          |     | President, Treasurer, Chief Executive                   
|                          |     | Officer and Chief Financial Officer                     
|                          |     | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Accounting
|                          |     | Officer and Principal Financial Officer)                

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Mount Knowledge
Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Mount Knowledge Holdings, Inc. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 06 - 206 Date: November 2, 2006 

Subject: Cancellation of Expanded FEHB Enrollment Code Project

Earlier OPM had considered expanding the FEHB Enrollment Code by January 1, 2008. We 

have now decided to retain the current three character FEHB enrollment code. The FEHB 

Program’s need to make additional enrollment codes available has been solved in part by 

recycling some codes that were previously used. 

 

If you have any questions, please contact Mary Hartman by email at mary.hartman@opm.gov. 

Please be sure to distribute this letter to all parts of your organization that are affected. 

 

 Sincerely, 

 

 Robert F. Danbeck 

 Associate Director 

 for Human Resources Products and Services
#### Tony M. SMITH and Nellie Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 75-1609.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 13, 1976.

H. M. Ray, U. S. Atty., Oxford, Miss., Scott P. Crampton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tax Div., U. S. Dept, of Justice, Gilbert E. Andrews, Acting Chief, Appellate Section, William A. Friedlander, Alfred S. Lombardi, Dept, of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, D. C., for defendant-appellant.

B. G. Perry, Southaven, Miss., Ben H. Stone, Gulfport, Miss., Charles E. Marx, Jackson, Miss., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before COLEMAN, GODBOLD and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs, a Mississippi highway patrolman and wife, sued for a refund of income taxes for 1972. The government included in income cash payments received by the husband to reimburse him for the cost of meals eaten while on duty. Plaintiffs claimed the payments were excludible under § 119 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. The district court granted a refund, relying on *U. S.*v. *Barrett,*321 F.2d 911 (C.A.5, 1963). The government concedes that *Barrett*controls unless reversed.

*1156We affirm on the basis of *Barrett. Accord, U. S. v. Morelan,*356 F.2d 199 (C.A.8, 1966); *Keeton v. U. S.,*383 F.2d 429 (C.A.10,1967). *Contra, Wilson v. U. S.,*412 F.2d 694 (C.A.1, 1969).

AFFIRMED.