alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUSSELL L. SCHOOLEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 311 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUSSELL L. SCHOOLEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 312 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

RUSSELL L. SCHOOLEY,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 313 WAL 2020

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of March, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad
Bernstein, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ BRAD
      BERNSTEINMay
      13, 2008
            
            Brad
      Bernstein,President
      and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



BAND REP MANAGEMENT, INC.



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with
the Annual Report of Band Rep Management, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended May 31, 2015, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Xiaoying Lei, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







/s/
Xiaoying Lei

Name:
Xiaoying Lei

Title: President, Secretary, Treasurer,
Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Director



Dated: April 3, 2017
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3439 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide for the inclusion of the names 

of certain members of the Armed Forces on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2015 

Mr. ROHRABACHER (for himself and Mrs. MIMI WALTERS of California) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Armed 

Services 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Defense to provide for the inclusion of the names of certain members of the Armed 

Forces on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. INCLUSION OF CERTAIN NAMES ON THE VIET4 NAM VETERANS MEMORIAL. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of Defense shall 

6 provide for the inclusion on the Vietnam Veterans Memo7 rial in the District of Columbia of the names of those 

8 members of the Armed Forces who died in transit to or 

9 from a covered combat zone during the Vietnam conflict, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

•HR 3439 IH

1 including such members who died in the Loma Ridge 

2 plane crash in California that occurred on June 25, 1965. 

3 (b) DEFINITIONS.—For purposes of this Act: 

4 (1) COVERED COMBAT ZONE.—The term ‘‘cov5 ered combat zone’’ means the combat zone defined 

6 by Executive Order No. 11216, signed by President 

7 Lyndon B. Johnson on April 24, 1965, and any sub8 sequent expansion of such zone. 

9 (2) VIETNAM CONFLICT.—The term ‘‘Vietnam 

10 conflict’’ has the meaning given such term in section 

11 1035 of title 10, United States Code. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: May 20, 2010 | /s/ David Bychkov                |   |
|--------------------|----------------------------------|--------|
|               | David Bychkov                    |   |
|               | President, Chief Financial       |   |
|               | Officer, Chief Executive Officer |   |
|               | (Principal financial officer)    |   |
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20

- 1527

_____________________________
J IMMY S TEPHENS ,
Petitioner
,

v.

F LORIDA D EPARTMENT O F C ORRECTIONS , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

September 22, 2021

P ER C URIAM

. The Court denies the petition for writ of certiorari on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that “clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the

me rits” is deemed a decision “which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel”).

L EWIS , M AKAR , and B ILBREY , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jimmy Stephens, pro se
, Petitioner

. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Kristen J. Lonergan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
EXHIBIT 31.1 / 31.2 CERTIFICATIONS  I, Jaskarn Samra, certify that:   1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Kranti Resources, Inc.   2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;   3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;   4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have;   (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;   (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under my supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;   (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and   (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this quarterly report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal control over financial reporting; and   5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit committee of Registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):   (a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and   (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting.    Date:  October 28, 2009 /s/ Jaskarn Samra Jaskarn Samra Principal Executive and Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. KARIEM GLENN, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 230 EAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 3rd day of September, 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
#### GOODEN v. PHILLIPS.

No. 3696.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 30, 1938.

Rehearing Denied July 16, 1938.

T. H. Neel, of Pyote, and Hubbard & Kerr, of Pecos, for appellant.

Hudson & Hudson, of Pecos, for appel-lee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

Appellee brought this suit against appellant to recover a balance of $803 alleged to be the amount due as salary for the months of September, October, November and December, 1936, under an express verbal contract of hiring. Appellant answered by general and special exceptions and general denials. The exceptions were overruled, the case submitted to the jury upon special issues, and upon the answers returned judgment was rendered in plaintiff’s favor for the amount sued for.

Defendant insists the petition is subject to a general demurrer because it did not allege a promise on the part of the defendant to pay the monthly salary agreed upon. The petition alleges: “That in April or May of 1936, and prior to September 1, 1936, the plaintiff was employed by the said E. B. Gooden at a salary of $300.-00 per month, same being a verbal agreement and thát such employment was to continue until plaintiff was discharged which was on February 8, 1937. * * * That by virtue of said agreement and employment and discharge'of said duties as aforesaid, the defendant owes to the plaintiff herein the balance of Eight Hundred Three ($803.00) Dollars, which he has failed and refused to pay.” While the petition does not, in so many words, aver an express promise on the part of the defendant to pay, yet the plain import and meaning of the. quoted portions of the petition is that the defendant did expressly agree to pay a monthly salary of $300. The petition is sufficient as against general demurrer.

Complaint is also made of the overruling of the special exceptions. These exceptions were perhaps technically well taken and should have been sustained. But the error, if any, in overruling the same is harmless and affords no ground for reversal because the plaintiff’s evidence shows he had a meritorious cause of ac*944tion, and it is apparent no injury resulted from the possible erroneous ruling on the special exceptions. Golden v. Odiorne, 112 Tex. 544, 249 S.W. 822.

Other assignments complain that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and judgment and that there is a fatal variance between the pleadings and the evidence, in that the suit is upon an express contract and the evidence shows plaintiff’s right of recovery, if any, is upon quantum meruit. These assignments are overruled. The evidence is ample to support the findings and judgment, and the plaintiff’s evidence is not subject to the objection of variance in the particular indicated above or otherwise.

All of the assignments presented are predicated upon a narrow interpretation of the pleadings and the effect of the evidence, and are regarded as without merit.

Affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3450 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit private educational lenders 

from requiring accelerated repayment of private education loans upon 

the death or disability of a cosigner of the loan. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Mr. KILDEE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To amend the Truth in Lending Act to prohibit private 

educational lenders from requiring accelerated repayment 

of private education loans upon the death or disability 

of a cosigner of the loan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Debt Repay5 ment Fairness Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3450 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON REQUIRING FULL REPAYMENT OF 

2 PRIVATE EDUCATION LOAN UPON DEATH OR 

3 DISABILITY OF COSIGNER. 

4 Section 140 of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

5 1650) is amended by adding at the end the following new 

6 subsection: 

7 ‘‘(g) PROHIBITION ON ACCELERATING REPAYMENT

8 UPON DEATH OR DISABILITY OF A COSIGNER ON A PRI9 VATE EDUCATION LOAN.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—If a cosigner who is jointly 

11 liable on a private education loan is unable to fulfill 

12 any obligations with respect to the loan by reason of 

13 death or disability, the private educational lender 

14 may not accelerate the repayment terms of any out15 standing obligation if the borrower is in good stand16 ing (as determined by the Bureau) with respect to 

17 the loan. 

18 ‘‘(2) DISABILITY DEFINED.—In this subsection, 

19 the term ‘disability’ means a permanent and total 

20 disability, as determined in accordance with the reg21 ulations of the Secretary of Education under section 

22 437(a) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

23 U.S.C. 1087(a)), or a determination by the Sec24 retary of Veterans Affairs that the individual is un25 employable due to a service-connected condition.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
August 7, 2012

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DONNIE RAY PEARSON, Appellant

NO. 14-11-00041-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

____________________

We order that this court’s former judgment of July 17, 2012, be vacated, set aside, 

and annulled. We further order this court’s opinion of July 17, 2012, withdrawn.

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having 

considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The 

Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED, and that this decision be certified below for 

observance.
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0305 

Standard Review Draft 5/29/2013 

ENGINEER: El-Zoobi \ AG 

PV(kg/yr)-

SUBMITTER: 3M Company 

- -

-

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
SAT (concems) (03/05/2013): 

Related Cases and Related Cases and Mise SAT Info: 

Ecotox Related Cases: Analogs: 

-

Migration · to grmmdwater: Rapid 

PBT rating: P3B1T2 . 

Health: 2 De1mal, Drinking Water, Inhalation 

Eco: 2 Water (All releases to water with a CC = 220 ppb) 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 2-3A 

NOTES & KEY ASSUMPTIONS: 

the 06/07/2005 version of ChemSTEER. 

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty /P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0305 

-

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0305 

-

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
-

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
-

II 

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
-

INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

PMN: 13-0305 

-

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
-

-

-

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION 

CALL BY: M. El-Zoobi 

Organization: EPA 

CALL TO: 

Organization: 3M 

Date: 04/1112013 

Time: 2:30 

Phone: Glen Giacoletto 

Conceming what TSCA CBI? 

PMN: 13-0305 

CBI: Yes 

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION 

CALL BY: M. El-Zoobi 

Organization: EPA 

CALL TO: 

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
Organization: 3M 

Date: 04/18/2013 

Time: 12 

Phone: Glen Giacoletto 

Conceming what TSCA CBI? 

PMN: 13-0305 

-

MEMORANDUM of CBI TELEPHONE CONVERSATION 

CALL BY: M. El-Zoobi 

Organization: EPA 

CALL TO: 

Organization: 3M 

Date: 05/28/2013 

Time: 2:00 

Phone: Glen Giacoletto 

Conceming what TSCA CBI? 

PMN: 13-0305 

file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM] 
file:/ //JifSNURS/Quatterly"/o20SNUR%20Batches/Q 15-2/Febmaty/P-13-0305/p 130305 .sr. txt[3/3/20 15 1 :24:29 PM]
BILL OF COSTS

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, SEVENTH DISTRICT, AT AMARILLO

No. 07-14-00098-CV

Emilio Adame and Kathy Adame

v.

Vista Bank

(No. 2012-568,283 IN COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO 3 OF LUBBOCK COUNTY)

Type of Fee Charges Paid By

Motion fee

Indigent

Supreme Court chapter 51 fee

Statewide efiling fee

Filing

$10.00

$25.00

$50.00

$20.00

$100.00

E-PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

PAID

Deirdre Trotter

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Emilio Adame, Kathy Adame

Balance of costs owing to the Seventh Court of Appeals, Amarillo, Texas: $0.00

Court costs in this cause shall be paid as per

the Judgment issued by this Court.

I, VIVIAN LONG, CLERK OF THE SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF TEXAS, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of

the cost bill of THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS,

showing the charges and payments, in the above numbered and styled cause, as the same appears

of record in this office.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, witness my hand

and the Seal of the COURT OF APPEALS for the

Seventh District of Texas on January 30, 2015.

Vivian Long

VIVIAN LONG, CLERK

FILE COPY
post-conviction counsel is discretionary in Nevada, and a prerequisite to 

the appointment of counsel is the filing of a petition, and appellant did not 

file his petition until after the one-year period had passed. SeeNRS 

34.750(1). Third, appellant's ignorance of procedural rules would not 

provide good cause for the delay. 2See Phelps v. Director, Prisons, 104 

Nev. 656, 764 P.2d 1303 (1988). Accordingly, we 

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 

J. 

Hardesty 

p J. 

1 

 Con.52.4treil, e

a

Parraguirre Cherry 

2We note that appellant's assertion that he was unaware of or 

unable to comply with procedural rules defies belief given appellant's 

lengthy history of litigation in this court, of which we take judicial notice. 

See e.g., Rowell v. State, Docket Nos. 36601, 36658, 37023 (Order of 

Affirmance and Dismissing Appeal, April 10, 2001); Rowell v. State, 

Docket Nos. 36693, 37210, 37242 (Order of Affirmance and Dismissing 

Appeal and Limited Remand for Correction of Judgment of Conviction, 

April 10, 2001); Rowell v. State,Docket No. 37283 (Order of Affirmance, 

July 9, 2001); Rowell v. State,Docket No. 37749 (Order of Affirmance, 

December 12, 2001); Rowell v. State,Docket Nos. 37836, 37838, 37839 

(Order of Affirmance, December 14, 2001); Rowell v. State,Docket No. 

42770 (Order of Affirmance, August 30, 2004); Rowell v. State,Docket No. 

42909 (Order of Affirmance, September 1, 2004); Rowell v. Warden, 

Docket No. 43019 (Order of Affirmance, September 22, 2004); Rowell v. 

State,Docket No. 43059 (Order of Affirmance, August 27, 2004); Rowell v. 

State,Docket No. 43218 (Order of Affirmance, November 15, 2004); Rowell 

v. State,Docket No. 43728 (Order of Affirmance, December 13, 2004); 

Rowell v. State,Docket No. 44595 (Order of Affirmance, April 22, 2005); 

Rowell v. State,Docket No. 44665 (Order of Affirmance, April 19, 2005); 

Rowell v. State,Docket No. 44686 (Order of Affirmance, May 3, 2005); 

Rowell v. State,Docket No. 54708 (Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in 

Part and Remanding, April 8, 2010); Rowell v. State,Docket No. 59852 

(Order of Affirmance, May 9, 2012). 

J. 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

2 
cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge 

Lamarr Rowell 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) 1947A 

3
|                                      |
|--------------------------------------|
|                                      |  |
| Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas | BNY Mellon Trust of Delaware |
| As Indenture Trustee                 | As Owner Trustee |
| Attn:  Michelle H.Y. Voon  | Attn:  Kristine Gullo |
| 100 Plaza One 6th Floor         | 301 Bellevue Parkway 3rd Floor |
| Jersey City, NY 07311                | Wilmington, DE  19809 |

|                                                 |
|-------------------------------------------------|
|                                                 |  |
| The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. | Ally Auto Assets LLC |
| Attn:  Robert Castle                  | Ally Financial Inc. |
| 2 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1020              | 200 Renaissance Center |
| Chicago, IL  60602                    | 10th Floor, MC 482-B10-A68 |
|                                            | Detroit, MI |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |
| Re:    | Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-4 |
|   | Annual Statement as to Compliance |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| a. | A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period of January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement has been under his supervision, and |

|    |
|----|
|    |  |
| b. | To the best of his knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Servicing Agreement throughout such period. |

|        |
|--------|
|        |  |  |
|   | Very truly yours, |
|   |   |
|   | /s/ David J. DeBrunner |   |
|   | David J. DeBrunner |
|   | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | Ally Financial Inc. |
CSRS Correction of Retirement Records FERS

Chapter 84

Publication of Chapter 84 has been delayed because of pending litigation regarding corrections of 

coverage errors. When decisions are issued, we will publish the chapter. In the meantime, there 

is some information on corrections of errors in chapters 80 and 81 that can supplement the 

information from the 831 and Payroll Office Letter 88-6 (August 10, 1988) on corrections of 

coverage errors.