alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### CITIZENS STATE BANK OF LINDEN et al. v. RAND et al.

No. 3621.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

April 7, 1938.

For former opinion, see 114 S.W.2d 578.

H. S. Garrett, of Fort Worth, and C. R. Newland and Newland & Cornett, all of Linden, for appellants.

Pippen & Salmon, of Linden, and Jones & Jones, of Marshall, for appellees.

WALTHALL, Justice.

The holding in our opinion upon appellants’ motion for rehearing that it would be necessary to file additional pleadings in order to make the interlined deed admissible is withdrawn. Appellants relied upon a plea of not guilty. The deed had been of record for more than 10 years, and no affidavit of forgery had been filed preceding-the trial. The question at issue and the proper procedure are controlled by the holding of our Supreme Court in Rodriguez v. Haynes, 76 Tex. 225, 13 S.W. 296, 298, reading as' follows:

> “If nothing appears to the contrary, the alteration, it is said, will be presumed to be contemporaneous with the execution of the instrument. ‘If any ground of suspicion is apparent upon the face of the instrument, the law presumes nothing, but leaves the question of the time when it was done, as well as that of the person by whom and the intent with which the alteration was made, as matters of fact, to be ultimately found by the jury upon proofs to be adduced by the party offering the instrument,’ etc. 1 Greenl.Ev. § 564. These principles are recognized in Park v. Glover’s Heirs, 23 Tex. [469] 472. Although there is not perfect harmony in the cases on the subject, it is generally agreed that, as fraud is not presumed, therefore, if no peculiar circumstances of suspicion attach to an altered instrument, the alteration is presumed to be innocent, or to have been made prior to its execution. 1 Greenl.Ev. § 564, and note 1.”

In other respects our views are unchanged.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 9, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81990-81991]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23312]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service


Open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: An open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel's Toll-Free 
Phone Lines Project Committee will be conducted. The Taxpayer Advocacy 
Panel is soliciting public comments, ideas, and suggestions on 
improving customer service at the Internal Revenue Service. This 
meeting will be held via teleconference.

DATES: The meeting will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelvin Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or 
504-202-9679.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given pursuant to Section 
10(a)(2) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. (1988) 
that an open meeting of the Taxpayer Advocacy Panel Toll-Free Phone 
Lines Project Committee will be held Thursday, November 14, 2024, at 
4:00 p.m. Eastern Time. The public is invited to make oral comments or 
submit written statements for consideration. Due to limited time and 
structure of meeting, notification of intent to participate must be 
made with Kelvin Johnson. For more information, please contact Kelvin 
Johnson at 1-888-912-1227 or 504-202-9679, or write TAP Office, 1555 
Poydras Street, Suite 12 New Orleans, LA 70112 or contact us at the 
website: http://www.improveirs.org. The agenda will include TAP 2024 
committee project focus areas.


[[Page 81991]]


    Dated: October 1, 2024.
Shawn Collins,
Director, Taxpayer Advocacy Panel.
[FR Doc. 2024-23312 Filed 10-8-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Satellite Broadcast

on Long Term Care

Sponsored by OPM, as part of the educational 

campaign for the Federal Long Term Care 

Insurance Program

• learn what long term care is and isn’t

• find out whether or not you’re already covered

• hear about options for paying for long term care

When: Wednesday March 6th

12:30-1:30 p.m. EST

Where: ______________________

For more 

information: ______________________

For more information on the Federal 

Long Term Care Insurance Program: 

www.LTCFEDS.com

www.opm.gov/insure/ltc
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), we, Benjamin W. Hulburt, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas C. Stabley, Chief Financial Officer of Rex Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                         |  |  |  |                        
|------------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Dated: November 14, 2007 |  |  |  |                        
|                         |  | 
|/s/ Benjamin W. Hulburt  |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas C. Stabley  
|Benjamin W. Hulburt      |  |  |  | Thomas C. Stabley      
|Chief Executive Officer  |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rex Energy Corporation and will be retained by Rex Energy Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Attachment 1: Going Green – View Your FEHB Brochure Online or 

Contact Your Plan for a Paper Brochure

Please remember that paper copies of health plan brochures will not be 

automatically mailed to Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program 

members.

Health plan brochures are available online at www.opm.gov/FEHBbrochures or 

on your health plan’s website. Accessing brochures online will help to lower 

administrative costs and protect natural resources. 

Your FEHB health plan will contact you to offer the option of obtaining your

2018 benefit brochure online or requesting a paper copy of the benefit brochure. 

If you did not previously request a paper copy of your health plan’s 

brochure, you will not automatically receive one. If you change plans, your 

new health plan will mail you a paper copy of its brochure.

If you choose to review the online version of your plan’s benefit brochure, you 

will still receive the Open Season package in the mail. This package will 

include an explanation of benefit changes and your new premium rate for 2018. 

Go to www.opm.gov/FEHBbrochures to view your FEHB health plan brochure 

and to get more information about our Going Green initiative.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Barrist, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) intentionally omitted;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 15, 2008



/s/ Michael J. BarristMichael J. BarristChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: THE PETITION OF LAW 

STUDENTS FOR EQUITABLE 

RESPONSES TO COVID-19 BY RYAN 

ALOYSIUS SMITH AND PRETTY 

MARTINEZ, TRUSTEES AD LITEM; 

ROBERT SUITE, MARY BETH KUZNIK, 

BRANDON VANTINE, ROBERT GAVIN, 

CHRISTIAN WOLGEMUTH, JESSICA 

MCDERMOTT, RAVEN MOORE, DEREK 

DEMERI, CATHERINE CUFF, MICHELLE 

TABACH, KARLA PISARCIK, CAROLINE 

ROBELEN, KARLI STUDY

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 74 WM 2020

Petition for Review Under the 

Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction and for 

Extraordinary Relief under the 

Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of September, 2020, Petitioners’ Application for Leave to 

File Reply Brief is GRANTED, and their Petition for Review under the Court’s Exclusive 

Jurisdiction and for Extraordinary Relief under the Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction is 

DENIED. Respondent’s Application for Leave to File Post-Submission Communication is 

DENIED as moot.
1 Date: June 25, 2010
Subject: Minutes of the June 10, 20 10 Conference Call with Nevada Division of Environmental Protection EPA Contract No. EP

- D

- 06

- 118; EPA Work Assignment No. 4

- 06 RTI Project No. 0210426.004.006

From: Chuck French OAQPS/SPPD/MMG (D24 3

- 02) U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, NC 27711

To: Docket ID No. EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2010

- 0239

I

. Introduction

A conference call with Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP) was held o n June 10 , 20 10 . The purpose of the m eeting was to discuss NDEP’s potential comments to the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Gold Mine Ore Processing and Production Area Source Category and Addition to Source Category List for Standards; Proposed Rule. This memorand um summarizes the major topics discussed during the meeting

.

II

. Attendees

Mike Elges, NDEP Rob Bamford, NDEP

Chuck French, U.S. EPA, OAQPS

Marvin Branscome, RTI International Gabrielle Raymond, RTI International

III

. Discussion

The major topics discussed dur ing the meeting included compliance testing, monitoring,

re p or t ing, and recordkeeping, the schedule for compliance, and the new source Maximum Achievable Control Technology standard for the carbon processes affected source

. The NDEP explained a few of the ir concerns and comments regarding the proposed rule.
| (logo) WELLS FARGO | Corporate Trust Services

MAC R1204-0109062 Old Annapolis RoadColumbia, MD 21045Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380 |
|--------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

 

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. 

375 PARK AVE FL 2

Wells Fargo Securities, LLC

NEW YORK, New York 10152-0002

 

 

RE: Annual Statement of Compliance for Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C8

 

Per the Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Certificate Administrator ("Wells Fargo"), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period"):

 

a. A review of Wells Fargo's activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision; and

 

b. To the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

 

February 25, 2016

 

 

/s/ Brian Smith

BRIAN SMITH

Vice President 

 

 

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Nicholas Galeone, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-Drequired to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust2012-C3 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as awhole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other informationrequired to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements requiredin this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers havefulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteriafor asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backedsecurities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances ofnoncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on informationprovided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, asMaster Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, DeutscheBank Trust Company Americas, as Certificate Administrator, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Custodian, and Park BridgeLender Services LLC, as Operating Advisor.

 

 

 

Dated: March 26, 2019

 

 

/s/ Nicholas Galeone

 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization ofthe depositor)
pOT-oSr- Z 00 3^ iSSb 3 

Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

From: JERRYOSULL@aol.com 

Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 2:41 PM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST); mbowman@gosilver.com; Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); EAS (OST) 

Cc: drichardson@gosilver.com 

Subject: Re: LWB Extension Request i3i 

Mr. Dennis DeVany, ^ 7^ c± ^ 

Greenbrier Valley Airport has no objection to the requested extension. 

rn-^:rT 

"0 "::P'-tli^ 

Jerry O'Sullivan, Airport Manager pr o § Vi 

In a message dated 3/13/2012 9:11:24 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, Dennis.DeVanv@dot.gov writes: 3 

Got it, thx 

From: Mickey Bowman rmailto:mbowman@aosilver.coml 

Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 9:07 AM 

To: Schlemmer, Kevin (OST); Devany, Dennis (OST); EAS (OST) 

Cc: Jerry O'Sullivan; Darrell Richardson 

Subject: LWB Extension Request 

Importance: High 

Silver Airways would like to request an extension of the deadline for submissions in response to the 

RFP for Greenbrier/Lewisburg, WV. 

Please see attached filing. 

Best regards.
Exhibit 32.01





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Quarterly Report of Madison Enterprises Group, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Zaroff, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/ Michael Zaroff


Name: Michael Zaroff


Title:   President











Dated:  November 15, 2010
*Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________ No. 96-40313 Summary Calendar

_____________________ ROBERT J. HURYSZ, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus OCEAN SHIPS, INC. and WILMINGTON TRUST CO., Defendants-Appellees.

_______________________________________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Southern District of Texas

(G-95-50)

_______________________________________________________ April 23, 1997 Before REAVLEY, BARKSDALE and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Robert Hurysz, employed as a seaman on the tanker M/V PEARL BUCK, operated by Ocean Ships, Inc., was injured when bringing in a mooring line by hand. Hurysz sued Ocean Ships and Wilmington Trust Co., the owner of the ship, alleging Jones Act negligence and unseaworthiness. 46 U.S.C. §688. At trial, the jury2

returned a verdict finding that Hurysz was injured on the ship as he alleged, but also finding that defendants were not negligent, nor the ship unseaworthy. The district court rendered judgment for the defendants, awarding nothing to Hurysz. Hurysz argues on appeal that the jury’s verdict is unsupportable as a matter of law because of evidence that Ocean Ships had determined in a safety meeting that lines would be brought in by mechanical and not manual means. Appellant contends the temporary unavailability of the winch resulted in the unseaworthiness of the vessel, and a reasonable jury could not have found otherwise. At trial, however, plaintiff failed to move for a directed verdict at the close of all the evidence or for a judgment n.o.v. following the return of the verdict. Our review is therefore “limited to whether there was any evidence below to support the jury’s verdict, irrespective of its sufficiency, or whether plain error was committed which, if not noticed, would result in a ‘manifest miscarriage of justice.’” Coughlin v. Capitol Cement Co., 571 F.2d 290, 297 (5th Cir. 1978); MacArthur v. University of Tex. Health Center at Tyler, 45 F.3d 890, 896 n.8 (5th Cir. 1995). The evidence tendered before the jury was that Hurysz injured himself while manually handling a mooring line, a routine operation in his duties as a seaman. The jury heard further3

evidence that the ship’s equipment was neither defective nor inadequate for the intended purposes of securing the mooring lines. Although the ship’s operators had earlier decided in the course of safety meetings to use mechanical means to bring in ship lines whenever possible, manual handling of the lines would still be necessary and expected under certain conditions. From the evidence in the record, the jury could have concluded that the M/V PEARL BUCK was not unseaworthy and that Ocean Ships was not negligent in permitting seamen to bring the lines in by hand on the occasion in question. Accordingly, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Hurysz’ claims and finding for defendant.
AFFIRMED.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3527 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National Monument, 

Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 16, 2015 

Mrs. LUMMIS introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To designate the mountain at the Devils Tower National 

Monument, Wyoming, as Devils Tower, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF DEVILS TOWER. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—The mountain at the Devils 

5 Tower National Monument, Wyoming, located at 

6 44°35′26′′N, by 104°42′55′′W, and the area located at 

7 44°35′21′′N, by 104°41′48′′W, shall be known and des8 ignated as ‘‘Devils Tower’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, map, 

10 regulation, order, document, paper, or other record of the 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3527 IH

1 United States to the mountain and area described in sub2 section (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to ‘‘Devils 

3 Tower’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS