alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Pop Starz Records, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Adam Wasserman, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. SS. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to SS. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                        /s/ Adam Wasserman
                                        ------------------
                                        Adam Wasserman, Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2007

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the company and will be retained by the company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 32**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002

 

The undersigned officer of Interups Inc. (the "Company"),hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 31, 2014 (the"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

/s/LikhithaPalaypu

LikhithaPalaypu

ChiefExecutive Officer

ChiefFinancial Officer

 

December19, 2014
#### VINSON v. STATE.

No. 16648.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1934.

Earl M. Greer, of Wills Point, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The record is before this court' without statement of facts and bills of exception.

The transcript fails to show any. notice of appeal. This is essential to confer jurisdiction on the reviewing court. See article 827, Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. 1925, and authorities collated under said article.

The appeal is dismissed.
[No. 25134-5-II.

Division Two.

October 27, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Appellant,*v. James Donald Cooley, *Respondent.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Cowlitz County, No. 98-1-00121-3, Randolph Furman, J., entered August 24, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Morgan, J., concurred in by Bridgewater, J., and Penoyar, J. Pro Tern.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)




The
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of 2020 ChinaCap Acquirco, Inc., certify that, to the best of
their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of 2020 ChinaCap Acquirco,
Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is
made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.




Date:
      May 15, 2009
              /s/
      George LuGeorge
      LuPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  May
      15, 2009
              /s/
      Louis KooLouis
      KooVice
      President & Chief Financial
Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-QSB for the three-month
period ending  January 31, 2008 of Techs  Loanstar,  Inc., a Nevada  corporation
(the  "Company"),  as filed with the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the
date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),  I, Gary Pizzacalla,  Chairman,  President
and Chief  Financial  Officer  of the  Company  certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section  1350 as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.   The information  contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
     material respects,  the financial condition and results of operation of the
     Company.



/s/ GARY PIZZACALLA
____________________________________________________________
Gary Pizzacalla
President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer and Sole Director


Date: March 13, 2008
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-210 Date: September 25, 2002 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Opportunity for 

Enrollees of Amcare Health Plans, Enrollment Codes ZH and ZQ, to Change 

Enrollment

Amcare Health Plan, enrollment codes ZH and ZQ, will no longer participate in the Federal 

Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program effective immediately, due to action by the State of 

Louisiana. 

Amcare enrollees in codes ZH and ZQ must change to another participating plan in order to 

continue to receive benefits under the FEHB Program. Enrollees who do not change plans 

will have no benefits for the remainder of the 2002 benefit year. The opportunity to change 

enrollment will begin immediately and continue through October 4, 2002. The effective date of 

all enrollment changes will be the pay period beginning September 22, 2002. Agencies may 

accept belated enrollment changes, however, the effective date of all enrollments accepted after 

October 4, 2002 must be retroactive to September 22, 2002. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 

Abby L. Block, 

Assistant Director 

 for Insurance Programs
##### 



Exhibit 8.1
  
        Vinson & Elkins LLP Attorneys at Law
    
    First City Tower, 1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2500Austin Beijing Dallas Dubai Hong Kong Houston
    
    Houston, TX 77002-6760London Moscow New York Shanghai Tokyo Washington
    
    Tel713.758.2222 Fax713.758.2346 www.velaw.com
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consentto the use in this Amendment No. 4 to Registration Statement No.333-140599 of Quicksilver Gas Services LP on Form S-1 ofour report dated February 9, 2007 (June 12,2007 as to paragraph 1 of Note 2) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the preparation of the financial statements of Quicksilver GasServices Predecessor from the separate records maintained by Quicksilver Resources Inc.) relatingto the financial statements of Quicksilver Gas Services Predecessor and to our reports datedJuly 25, 2007 relating to the balance sheets of Quicksilver Gas Services LP and Quicksilver GasServices GP LLC, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Prospectus./s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
2005 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

11-9-2005

James v. Nash

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 05-1864

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2005 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"James v. Nash" (2005). 2005 Decisions. Paper 243.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2005/243
APS-13 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

NO. 05-1864

________________

ELMER JAMES, JR.,

 Appellant

 v.

WARDEN JOHN NASH

____________________________________

On Appeal From the United States District Court

For the District of New Jersey

(D.C. Civ. No. 05-CV-00498)

District Judge: Honorable Freda L. Wolfson

_______________________________________

Submitted For Possible Summary Action Under Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6

October 14, 2005

Before: SLOVITER, MCKEE AND FISHER, Circuit Judges.

(Filed November 9, 2005 )

_______________________

 OPINION

_______________________

PER CURIAM

Elmer James, Jr. appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the

District of New Jersey, denying his petition for habeas corpus. In his petition, James

argued that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) was miscalculating his “good time credits”
2

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3624(b). James argued that the BOP incorrectly based its

calculations on the number of days actually served rather than the length of the sentence

imposed.

We recently addressed the identical arguments in O’Donald v. Johns, 402 F.3d 172

(3d Cir. 2005). We concluded, as did the District Court here, that the BOP’s

interpretation of the statute, which utilizes a formula based on the time actually served, is

reasonable. We therefore will affirm the District Court’s order.
3
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06255

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 06255\06255_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06255\06255_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

06255\06255_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06255\06255_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06255\06255_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06255\06255_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

06255\Certification Statement_06255.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06255\Supporting Documentation\06255_WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06255\Supporting Documentation\06255_WB-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06255\Supporting Documentation\06255_WB-4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06255\Supporting Documentation\WB-3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06255\Supporting Documentation\WB-5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason
Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the
period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed
by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,
the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been
disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the
following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.



/s/ Jason KulasName: Jason KulasTitle: President and Chief Financial OfficerDate: March 23, 2015
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, Brian Baker, the President and Chief Executive Officer of J.P. Morgan
  Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., the depositor into the
  above-referenced Trust, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K, of the Trust (the "Exchange Act Periodic Reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were
    made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act Periodic Reports, the Master Servicer,
    the Sub-Servicer and the Special Servicer have fulfilled their
    obligations under
    the Pooling and Servicing Agreement in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate
    Services, Inc., National Tax Search, LLC, Midland Loan Services, a
    Division of PNC Bank, National Association, U.S. Bank National Association
    and TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.

    Dated:   March 28, 2013


    /s/ Brian Baker
    Signature

    President and Chief Executive Officer
    J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
    Securities Corp.
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ B. K. ChinB. K. Chin
Chief Executive Officer
November 7, 2007
October 14, 2010

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Application of Delta Air Line s, Inc., in Docket DOT-OST-2008-0252

Dear Mr. Secretary:

For the reasons set forth below, this is to express the support of the Air Line Pilots Association for the applicat ion of Delta Air Lines – as it is the only U.S. airline that has applied - fo r three of the slot pairs involving Heathrow airport that American Air lines and its oneworld partners have been required to divest as a condition of the Department’s approval of their request for antitrust immunity in this proceeding. An award of the

slots to a U.S. air carrier such as Delta would ensure that the economic and employment benefits represented by the slots will be maximized and will flow to a U.S. airline and its employees.

In the Final Order (Order 2010-7-8), DOT determined that a slot transfer remedy was necessary to preserve some of the competition that will be lost by virtue of the alliance proposed by the oneworld applicants. This remedy requires the transfer of tw o slot pairs for the Boston-Heathrow route and two for any other U. S. – Heathrow service.

It would be appropriate for the Depa rtment to award as many of these slots as possible to a U.S. air carrier . Delta has requested the allocation of the two slot pairs for Boston-Heathr ow and one of the others, which it plans to use on the Miami-Heathrow route. No other U.S. airline has applied for these slots and the propos ed operations represent more than 80 quality pilot jobs as well as seve ral hundred more jobs for other Delta and U.S. airport workers. Under the aviation statutes the DOT is to attempt to strengthen the competitiv e position of U.S. air carriers to ensure at least equality with foreign air carriers, including the attainment of the opportunity to maintain and incr ease their profitability in foreign air transportation. The Department is also required to attempt to encourage fair wages and working conditions. 49 U.S.C. sections 40101 (a)(5) and (15). Certainly, an award to Delta would advance these statutoryThe Honorable Raymond H. LaHood Secretary U.S. Department of Transportation October 14, 2010 Page 2

objectives. Moreover, as Delta shows in its application, the carrier is in a good position to maximize the value of these slots. Delta currently uses all the slots it currently has at Heathrow and has presented a sound business proposal for using the requested slots as well.

Accordingly, ALPA strongly urges the Department to grant Delta’s request. It is essential that U.S. carriers and their employees receive the most benefit possible from the decision to grant the oneworld partners’ application for antitrust immunity. It is all the more important that the Department take this action at a time when the economic health of U.S. air carrier industry remains fragile and em ployment at the major U.S. airlines

continues to drift downward.

We appreciate your considerat ion of our views on this matter.

Sincerely,

John H. Prater

President

cc: Docket OST-2008-0252
#### GREER v. BOYKINS’ ESTATE.

No. 2761.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont,

May 9, 1935.

A. L. Shaw, of Beaumont, for plaintiff in error.

Wilmot Warner, Jas. G. Donovan, and M. L. Pepper, all of Houston, for defendant in. error.

COMBS, Justice.

Defendant in error was appointed administrator of the estate of Richard Boykins,, deceased, by the probate court of Jefferson-county, Tex. Plaintiff in error thereafter filed a petition in the proceeding claiming to-be the daughter and legal heir of the deceased, and seeking the removal of Donovan as such administrator. She alleged various grounds of invalidity of the administration,, claimed that no administration was necessary, and sought to have the estate of the deceased, which was valued at $1,000, turned over to her. On such petition the county judge entered an order closing the administration, discharging the administrator, and ordering the estate turned over to her.

On appeal to the Sixtieth district court of Jefferson county, a trial was had to a jury, and in response to special issues the jury found, in substance, that plaintiff in error was not the legitimate child of Richard Boykins, deceased. Upon such finding, the trial court entered judgment holding that plaintiff in error had no interest in the *699estate and denying her petition. - This appeal is from that judgment.

There is no statement of facts. We must accept the findings of the jury and the judgment of the court as being supported by the evidence. The facts, as ■ found, establish that plaintiff in error has no interest whatever in the estate of Richard Boykins, deceased. She is, therefore, in no position to contest the validity of the probate proceedings; and this is so even if said proceedings were void, as plaintiff in error contends, a question which we are not called upon to decide. For even if such proceedings are void, one seeking to attack them must have some legal interest in the subject-matter cognizable by the courts in order to maintain the point. Moore v. Stark, 118 Tex. 565, 17 S.W.(2d) 1037, 21 S.W.(2d) 296.

The judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1




STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Stanley
A. Hirschman, Principal Executive Officer of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 29, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/   Stanley A
      Hirschman.Stanley
      A. Hirschman, Principal Executive OfficerDated:
      January 12, 2011