alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
31.1





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


and
Securities and Exchange Commission Release 34-46427





I, Sanjiw
Kumar Singh, certify that:





1. I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Protech Global Holdings
Corp.;





2.
 Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3.
 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report;





4.
 The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we
have:





a) designed
such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b) evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation;





c) disclosed
in this report any change in registrant's internal control over financial
reporting the occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and





5.
 The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal
control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting,




Dated:
      August 19, 2009
            /s/
      Sanjiw Kumar SinghSanjiw
      Kumar Singh
              Chairman,
      Chief Executive Officer and
President
EXHIBIT 32.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection  with the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the  three-month
period  ending July 31,  2008 of  Barricode,  Inc.,  a Nevada  corporation  (the
"Company"),  as filed with the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date
hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Tom Delaney,  Chairman,  President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Quarterly  Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section
          13(a) or15(d) of the  Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
          and

     2.   The information contained in this Quarterly Report fairly presents, in
          all  material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of
          operation of the Company.


/s/ TOM DELANEY
____________________________________________
    Tom Delaney
    President, Secretary Treasurer,
    Principal Executive Officer,
    Principal Financial Officer and Director


Date: September 5, 2008
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SFH I Acquisition Corp. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Armen Karapetyan,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
                August 13, 2008
            
            /s/Armen
                Karapetyan.
            
            Armen Karapetyan
### Schmeltz, Rachel Fro m : 

### Sent : To: Cc: 

### Subj ect : Attachme nts:

Hi Aaron, Schmeltz, Rachel Tuesday, December 01 , 2015 11:52 AM ' Szabo, Aaron' Vanlare, Paula; Ragan Tate ; Banks, Julius EPA Response to Interagency Working Comments on SAN 5835 EPA Response to Interagency Working Comments 11 -30 - 15.docx; SAN 5835

_ GHGRP Amendments Proposal 11-30-15

_

mkup.docx; VAM Emissions Estimation Based on Samp l ing Intervals - 10June2015.docx; Use of inspection data from MSHA for reporting quarterly methane liberation from mine ventilation shafts 11-13-2015

_Final.docx

Attached are EPA's responses to the lnteragency working comments with references to the pages on which edits were made in the preamble. Also attached are the marked up preamble and the two supporting documents for subpart FF referenced in the comments and responses . In addition to several formatting and editorial changes made in this markup, there are a few substantive changes that were not in response to the comments: Language was added under Supp l ementary Information -Regulated Entities on page 3 on advice from our Counsel An update to ASTM test method 06866 that was discovered after the previous files went to OMB. This can be found on page 27 and page 58 Changes made in the amendatory text to fix errors in Table 1 -3. These are minor transcription errors and are explained in the Table of Revisions, not in the preamble . Ifyou have any questions, please let me know . Thanks! Rachel Rachel Schmeltz U.S. Environmental Protection Agency schmeltz.rachel@epa.gov Phone: 202-343-9124 Telework on most Fridays Alternate phone number for telework days: 301 -252-8060.

1
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications


I, David Nass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C2 (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management
LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, U.S. Bank
National Association, as Certificate Administrator, U.S. Bank National Association, as
Custodian, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real
Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, and National Tax Search,
LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.


Dated: March 29, 2016


/s/ David Nass


President and Chief Executive Officer
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
|     |  |                                                                                                                        
|---- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  | Corporate Trust Services 
MAC R1204-010 9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045 
Tel: 410 884 2000 Fax: 410 715 2380

Exhibit 35.5

Citibank, N.A.

388 Greenwich Street

14th Floor

New York, New York 10013



|RE: | Annual Statement of Compliance for Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-4 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-4
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per the Amended and Restated Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of January 1, 2014 (the Agreement), the undersigned, a duly authorized
officer of Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Master Servicer (Wells Fargo), hereby certifies as follows as of and for the year ending December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period):

(a) A review of Wells Fargos activities during the Reporting Period and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under such
officers supervision; and

(b) To the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, Wells Fargo has fulfilled all of
its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|March 1, 2016                
|                             
|LOGO                         
|Kristen Cronin Vice President



|                       |  |     
|---------------------- |  | ----
|Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |  | LOGO
#### Harry Gurwitz, Plaintiff, *v.*Vim Electric Co., Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Garod Electronics Corp., Third-Party Defendant-Appellant, et al., Third-Party Defendant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 30, 1958.

*Arthur J. Homans*for appellant.

*Seymour J. Ugelow*for respondents.

*Per Curiam.*

Upon the record presented, it does not appear that the default was willful; rather, if service was made, it was an excusable default. Although the alleged service of the third-party summons and complaint was made on July 24, 1950, the case was tried on May 25, 1956, nearly six years later. George Sheridan, the person upon whom the alleged service was made, is now deceased. His precise habits in forwarding all process served upon him to the office of the corporation’s attorney, when considered in connection with the process server’s affidavit that he has no independent recollection of this particular service, is sufficient ground for opening the default upon proper papers.

The order should be reversed, with $10 costs, only to the extent of granting leave to third-party defendant Garod to renew the original motion insofar as it seeks to open its default and he permitted to appear and plead therein upon proper papers, including a copy of the proposed answer; otherwise affirmed.

*891Appeal from order of July 16, 1956 should be dismissed, as the required permission was not obtained.

Hecht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 24
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 24
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 24
 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 24
 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 24
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 7 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 8 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 9 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 10 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 11 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 12 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 13 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 14 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 15 of 24
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 16 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 17 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 18 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 19 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 20 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 21 of 24
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 22 of 24
EPA SANITIZED Page 23 of 24
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 24 of 24
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of AmREIT, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Chad C. Braun, Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, in my capacity as an officer of the Company, that, to my knowledge:



1.
     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
     May 6, 2011
     /s/ Chad C. BraunChad C. Braun
Chief Financial Officer
















---
# Support center

OPM is here to help. Get answers to your questions, learn about popular topics, and find resources for more support.

OPM.gov / Retirement

## Federal Retirement

### Popular Articles

                - What is Login.gov
                - What is the OPM retirement claim number?
                - What does the OPM retirement claim number look like?
                - Where to find your OPM retirement claim number
                - Report a missing annuity payment
                - Report an annuitant death
                - Report a federal employee death

### Manage your account online

                - Getting started with OPM Retirement Services Online
                - How to login to Services Online
                - Reset your password for OPM Retirement Services Online
                - Get your monthly annuity payment statement
                - Get your annual summary of payment
                - Verify life insurance enrollment (FEGLI)
                - Get your 1099-R tax form
                - Change your federal and state income tax withholdings
                - View or print your retirement card
                - Check your interim retirement pay status
                - Start or change direct deposit
                - Start or change a checking or savings account allotment
                - Start or change allotment to an organization
                - Request a copy of your annuity booklet
                - Update your profile and contact information
                - Change your mailing address
                - Change your email and mail communication preferences

### FAQ Topics

                - Applying for Retirement Benefits
                - Cost-of-living adjustments (COLA)
                - Court Ordered Benefits
                - Disability Benefits
                - Disability Earnings Survey
                - FERS Annuity Supplement Survey
                - Health benefits
                - Interim pay during retirement processing
                - Life insurance benefits
                - Marital Survey
                - Military service
                - Phased retirement
                - Planning for retirement
                - Postal Service Health Benefits
                - Services Online and Login.gov
                - Survivor benefits
                - Taxes for retirement benefits
                - Understanding annuity payments
                - Understanding retirement eligibility
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3318 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to modify regulations to increase 

the amount of the de minimis safe harbor election for exemption from 

capital expenditures for taxpayers without certain financial statements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. BLUM (for himself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to modify regulations to increase the amount of the de minimis safe 

harbor election for exemption from capital expenditures 

for taxpayers without certain financial statements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Tax Prepara5 tion Burdens for American Investments and Repairs Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3318 IH

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DE MINIMIS SAFE HARBOR ELECTION 

2 FOR EXEMPTIONS FROM CAPITAL EXPENDI3 TURES FOR TAXPAYERS WITHOUT CERTAIN 

4 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 6 months after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the 

7 Treasury shall modify Treasury Regulation section 

8 1.263(a)–1(f) (26 C.F.R. 1.263(a)–1(f)) to increase the 

9 $500 de minimis rule for taxpayers without applicable fi10 nancial statements to $2,500. 

11 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The revised regulations 

12 under this section shall apply to amounts paid or incurred 

13 in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Cite as 2017 Ark. App. 6

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION I

No. CR-16-614

TANNER BAXLEY

APPELLANT

V.

STATE OF ARKANSAS

APPELLEE

OPINION DELIVERED: January 18, 2017

APPEAL FROM THE HOT SPRING

COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

[NO. 30CR-12-262-1]

HONORABLE CHRIS E WILLIAMS, 

JUDGE

AFFIRMED; MOTION TO 

WITHDRAW GRANTED

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Judge

On December 11, 2012, appellant Tanner Baxley was placed on five years’ supervised 

probation for the offense of theft by receiving, a Class C felony. He was ordered to pay 

$150 in court costs, a $1,000 fine, a $250 DNA fee, and $951.50 in supervision fees. On 

February 14, 2014, the State filed a petition to revoke Baxley’s probation. On June 24, 

2014, an amended report of probation violation was filed alleging that Baxley had violated 

the following conditions: 1-Laws, 2-Alcohol/Controlled Substances, 6-Reporting, 7-

Employment and Residence, 13-Supervision Fees, 14-Restitution and 15-Court Costs, 

Fines, and DNA. At the hearing on the petition to revoke on April 12, 2016, Baxley 

admitted to each of the alleged violations. The trial court sentenced appellant to ten years 

in the Arkansas Department of Correction.
Cite as 2017 Ark. App.

2

This is a no-merit appeal filed pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), 

and Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 4-3(k) (2016). On appeal, Baxley’s counsel argues that 

there are no meritorious grounds for appeal and asks to withdraw as counsel. The clerk of 

this court mailed a certified copy of counsel’s motion and brief to Baxley in accordance with 

Rule 4-3(k)(2), informing him of his right to file pro se points for reversal. Baxley has not 

filed pro se points. Because counsel has complied with the requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we 

grant the motion to withdraw and affirm.

The test for filing a no-merit brief is not whether there is any reversible error, but 

whether an appeal would be wholly frivolous. Gaines v. State, 2014 Ark. App. 651. Based 

on our review of the record for potential error pursuant to Anders, supra, and the 

requirements of Rule 4-3(k), we hold that Baxley’s appeal is wholly without merit. 

Therefore, pursuant to sections (a) and (b) of In re Memorandum Opinions, 16 Ark. App. 301, 

700 S.W.2d 63 (1985), we issue this memorandum opinion granting counsel’s motion to 

withdraw and affirming the circuit court’s revocation.

Affirmed; motion to withdraw granted.

HARRISON and VAUGHT, JJ., agree.

Gregory Crain, for appellant.

No response.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 9, 2007
    /s/ Robert R. HarlRobert R. HarlChief Executive Officer 50