alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BARNES v. STATE.

No. 17768.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Otto Atchley, of New Boston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of manufacturing liquor, to wit, whisky, and his punishment was assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 1 year.

Pending the appeal of this case, the law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended) under which the conviction was had has been repealed. See Acts 44th Leg. 2d Called Session, § 49, article 1 of Liquor Control Act (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666—49), and Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, this day decided by this court.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 04150

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 04150\04150_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

04150\04150_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

04150\04150_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 04150\04150_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04150\04150_PartE.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 04150\04150_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

04150\Certification Statement Plant ID 04150.pdf Plant certification statement

x 04150\Supplemental Documents\04150_Lake Hubbard Property Map.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 04150\Supplemental Documents\04150_LHSES Water Balance Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
#### STREET et al. v. STATE LIFE INS. CO. OF INDIANAPOLIS, IND., et al.

No. 9357.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 16, 1934.

Rehearing Denied June 27, 1934.

E. S. J. Whitehead, of San Antonio, for appellants.

Kampman & Burney, of San Antonio, for appellees.

*703FLY, Chief Justice.

This suit was instituted by appellants against appellees for the purpose of restraining the threatened sale of certain properties, under a deed of trust, belonging to appellants, located in Bexar county, Tex. The court granted a temporary restraining order, but later, on a hearing, dissolved same and denied appellants application for temporary injunction.

Appellants’ petition for injunction was based on two grounds: First, they sought to invoke the provisions of H. B. No. 231, commonly known as the Moratorium Law (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 221Sb); second, that article 5, § 8, of the Constitution of Texas, giving to the district courts jurisdiction of all suits for the trial of the title to land and for the enforcement of liens thereon, prohibited the sale of land by the trustee under the deed of trust.

The order from which this appeal was perfected was made on August 10, 1933, and the appeal filed in this court on August 28, 1933. On May 1, 1934, the law expired by its terms and furthermore, by the terms of the' last Moratorium Act, all laws in conflict with that law were repealed. It is clear, therefore, that there is no law under which a decision in this case could be considered, and therefore the question is moot. The cause will be dismissed.
EX-35.2
 (logo) Deutsche Bank

1761 East St. Andrew Place
Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

Tel 714 247 6000
Fax 714 247 6009


ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,
as the Trustee (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), by and among, RBS
Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont
Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator, and Custodian,
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee here by certifies in
accordance with Section 11.11 of the Agreement:

A) A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities during the preceding
   calendar year and of such Certifying Servicer's performance under the
   Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision and
B) That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review,
   such Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the
   Agreement, in all material respects during the preceding calendar year.

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
as Trustee

/s/ David Co
BY: David Co
Title: Director
Date: March 1, 2014
## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ Nos. 08-3894/09-1304

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeals from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of North Dakota. Sebastian Joseph Feist, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: September 29, 2009 Filed: October 2, 2009

___________ Before WOLLMAN, RILEY, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. In these consolidated appeals, Seba stian Joseph Feist, a federal inmate incarcerated in Colorado, challenges the distri ct court’s denial of his petition for a writ of audita querela, as well as the court’s or der that he pay the appellate filing fee in installments in accordance with th e Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).
Feist was sentenced to life in prison inOctober 1976 after he pleaded guilty in the District of North Dakota to armed bank robbery, murder, and firearms charges. The Parole Commission has denied parole each time Feist has been considered. In April 2008 Feist filed a petition for a writ of audita querela, arguing that the Commission was required to set a release date , and asking for release. We agree with-2- the district court that it could not grant relief. A writ of audita que rela is not available where other cognizable remedies exist, seeUnited States v. Richter , 510 F.3d 103, 104 (2d Cir. 2007) (per curiam), and the proper avenue for the relief Feist seeks is 28 U.S.C. § 2241, as his claim is a challenge to the execution of his sentence, see Bell v. United States , 48 F.3d 1042, 1043 (8th Cir. 1995). Th e district court correctly found that it lacked jurisdiction to consider a section 2241 petition brought by Feist. See United States v. Chappel , 208 F.3d 1069, 1069-70 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam) (§ 2241 petition must be brought in district of incarceration, District of Columbia, or district in which Bureau of Prisons maintains regional office).
We conclude, however, that the fili ng-fee provisions of the PLRA are inapplicable here. Cf. Malave v. Hedrick , 271 F.3d 1139, 1139-40 (8th Cir. 2001) (per curiam) (PLRA is inapplicable to hab eas corpus actions). We thus agree with Feist that the district court erred in imposing a payment schedule to collect the appellate filing fee.
Accordingly, in No. 08-3894 we affirm the district court’s judgment denying audita querela relief. In No. 09-1304, we grant Feist’s pending motion and vacate the district court’s order for payment of the fili ng fee, and we direct that any part of the fee Feist has paid be returned to him.

______________________________
Exhibit 32

OAK RIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

Certification of Periodic Financial Report

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned
officers of the Oak Ridge Financial Services, Inc. (the Company) certify that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal period ended March 31, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |                                      
|------------------ |  | -------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2010 |  | s/s Ronald O. Black                  
|                   |  | Ronald O. Black                      
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 13, 2010 |  | s/s Thomas W. Wayne    
|                   |  | Thomas W. Wayne        
|                   |  | Chief Financial Officer

*This certification is made
solely for purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.



34
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Bernstein, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ BRAD BERNSTEINBrad Bernstein,President and Chief Financial OfficerNovember 15, 2010
### SERVE D NOVEMBE R23 , 201 1 U.S . DEPARTMEN

T O FTRANSPORTATSJ^ f j^^ ^ OFFICE O

FHEARINGS OOGKEt'OFRAToJi S WASHINGTON , D

C " 201 ! NO V 2 3 P | : I i In Th e Matte r

Of : BRUNILD A ROS A Responden t FA A Docke t No . [T O B E ASSIGNED ] FDM S No . FAA-2011-066 9

ORDE RDISMISSIN GPROCEEDIN G O n Novembe r

22 , 201 1 th e Complainant , th e Federal Aviatio n Administratio n (FAA ) filed aNotic e o f

SettlementAVithdrawal o f Complain t

withth e Offic e o f Hearings . Thi s Notic e o f

Settlement/Withdrawa l o f Complain t

state dthat

th e partie s had reache dasettlemen t

an dthat th e FAA wa s withdrawin g it s Jun e 15 , 201 1 Notic e o f Complaint . I t I s Hereb y Ordered : 1 ) Th e Decembe r

1 , 201 1 Secon dLitigatio n Schedulin g Conferenc e schedule d for 10:30a mEastern Standar dTim e i s cancelled . 2 ) Pursuan t

t o 1 4 C.F.R . §13.215 , thi s proceedin g i s dismisse dwithprejudice . Judg e J.E . SuUiva

n U.S . Admifltstrativ e Law Judg e Attachment : Servic e Lis tFDM S NO . FAA-2011-066 9 (Civi l Penalt

y Action ) SERVIC E LIS T ORIGINA L& ON E COP Y Federal Aviatio n Administratio n 80 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W . Washington , D C 2059 1 Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC-43 0 Wilbu r Wrigh t Building—Suit e 2W1000 '

ON E COP Y Brunild aRosa , Responden t 208 4 Bronx Plac e Eas t Apt . 5J Bronx , NY 1046 2 Rya n M . Landers , Complainant' s Counse l Offic e o f th e Regional Counsel , ASO- 7 Souther n Regio n P.O . Bo x 2063 6 Atlanta , G

A 3032 0 TEL : . 404-305-520 0 FAX : 404-305-522 3 Th e Honorabl e J.E . Sullivan , Administrativ e La w Judg e Offic e o f Hearings , M-2 0 U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 1200 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , S.E . Washington , D C 2059 0 TEL : 202-366-213 2 FAX : 202-366-753 6

Servic e wa s b y U.S . Mail . For servic e i n perso n or

by expedite dcourier , us e th e followin g address : Federal Aviatio n Administration , 60 0 Independenc e Avenue , S.W. , Wilbur Wright Building—Suit e 2W1000 , Washington , D C 20591 ; Attention : Hearin g Docke t Clerk , AGC^30 .

- 2 -
| 1. | Such      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending January 31, 2009,      fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the      Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period      ending January 31, 2009, fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Henya Food      Corp. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:      June 19, 2009                     |
|----------------------------------------------|
|                                         |
| /s/      Henry  Ender                        |
| Henry      EnderChief      Executive Officer |
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

PEOPLE’S TRUST INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellant,

v.

JAVIER MATURANA and MADELINE MARTINEZ,

Appellees.

No. 4D18-1447

[February 7, 2019]

Appeal of a non-final order from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Jeffrey R. Levenson, Judge; L.T. Case 

No. CACE 17-020737 (09).

Kathryn L. Ender of Cole, Scott & Kissane, P.A., Miami, and Brett R. 

Frankel and Jonathan M. Sabghir, Deerfield Beach, for appellant.

Kenneth R. Duboff of Duboff Law Firm, North Miami, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
#### GALVAN v. STATE.

No. 17221.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 13, 1935.

For former opinion, see 86 S.W. (2d) 228.

Carroll W. Smith, of El Paso, for appellant.

Roy Jackson, Dist. Atty., of El Paso, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant asks leave to file second motion for rehearing. We are not at liberty to consider ex parte affidavits which accompany appellant’s request. Same relate to matters which should have been presented to the trial court at the time of the trial. The record made here is not subject to any such attack. We have again looked over the matters referred to in appellant’s application, which are germane, and are not led to believe any error was committed in our disposition of the case.

The request is denied.
# Official Journal C 205/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 205 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4929 August 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 205

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4929 August 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 205/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 205/2 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections | 2 |
| 2006/C 205/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4353 — Permira/All3Media Group) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 205/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4249 — Abertis/Autostrade) (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 205/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 205/2

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections

2

2006/C 205/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4353 — Permira/All3Media Group) (1)

4

2006/C 205/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4249 — Abertis/Autostrade) (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
United States of America 

Department of Transportation 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Washington, DC 

Re: In the Matter of the Petition for Exemption of Winn Fuqua Photography, Inc. for a Summary 

Grant Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

I am writing pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to request that 

Winn Fuqua Photography, Inc. ("Fuqua"), an owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft, be 

exempted from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs") listed in the attached petition. This exemption 

will allow Fuqua to employ its small unmanned aircraft systems ("sUASs") to conduct commercial aerial 

photography and videography in pre-planned, controlled areas. 

As described herein, Fuqua is a professional photography and videography company working with a 

range of industries ranging from advertising, public relations, residential/commercial realty, construction, 

industrial applications, and the agricultural community. Fuqua has been in business for over 25 years, 

and the owner of Winn Fuqua Photography, Inc., Winn Fuqua, has over five years of recreational/hobby 

experience in remote control vehicles. 

Sincerely, 

"-llti?c} &eP. 

Patrick Doll 

Attachment
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-2684

LT Case No. 2009-CF-000189

_____________________________

DENNIS LONG,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

3.800 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

Dennis Long, Bowling Green, pro se.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Damaris Reynolds, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

October 31, 2023

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238 (Fla. 2007).

LAMBERT, EISNAUGLE, and KILBANE, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
EXHIBIT 23.1
 [BDO USA, LLP Letterhead]





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





Emerge Energy Services LP Southlake, Texas


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Reg. No. 333-188604) and Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-196465) of Emerge Energy Services LP of our reports dated March 2, 2015, relating to the consolidated financial statements, and the effectiveness of Emerge Energy Services LP’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K/A.








/s/ BDO USA, LLP


Dallas, Texas


September 16, 2015
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 16667.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1934.

Joe Spurlock and Jack Carter, both of Port Worth, for appellant.

Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft from the person; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.'

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3532 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3532

  To amend the fresh fruit and vegetable program under the Richard B. 
Russell National School Lunch Act to include canned, dried, frozen, or 
                     pureed fruits and vegetables.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 17, 2015

 Mr. Poliquin (for himself, Mr. Schrader, Mr. Ribble, and Mr. Messer) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                      Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the fresh fruit and vegetable program under the Richard B. 
Russell National School Lunch Act to include canned, dried, frozen, or 
                     pureed fruits and vegetables.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fruit and Vegetable Access for 
Children Act''.

SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO FRESH FRUIT AND VEGETABLE PROGRAM.

    Section 19 of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act (42 
U.S.C. 1769a) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by inserting ``, canned, dried, 
        frozen, or pureed'' after ``fresh'';
            (2) in subsection (b), by inserting ``, canned, dried, 
        frozen, or pureed'' after ``fresh''; and
            (3) in subsection (e), by inserting ``, canned, dried, 
        frozen, or pureed'' after ``fresh''.
                                 <all>
```
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 24, 2011 

y1017 

Order 

 

October 24, 2011 

143322 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143322 

 COA: 295712 

Ottawa CC: 09-033667-FC 

OUVINAY XAYSANA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 5, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.