alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Executive Order 12866 

and 

Congressional Review Requirements 

Rulemaking Document Title: NPRM (Enhancing Airline Passenger Protections 

RIN: 2105-Ar)92 

With respect to the attached rulemaking document(s): 

1. E.0.12866: The requirements of section 6(a)(3)(E) of E.O. 12866 have been met in accordance with the 

following [initial appropriate line]: 

The rulemaking document(s) was not reviewed by the Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs (OIRA). 

No substantive changes were made to the document(s) after it was submitted to OIRA. 

X The required information is attached. 

2. Congressional Review: The requirements of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act 

for the submission of final rules to Congress and GAO (§ 801) have been met in accordance with the 

following [inidal appropriate line]: 

X This document is not a final rule. 

This document is not a rule under (§ 804). 

The document has been submitted to C-50 for transmission to Congress and GAO. 

Signature 

Blane A. Workle 

Name 

Deputy assistant General' Counsel for Aviation 

Enforcement and Proceedings 

Title/Office 

Date
cc: Hon. Robert W. Lane, District Judge Daniel Joseph Jarvis Alan J. Butte11 & Associates Nye County District Attorney Attorney General/Carson City Nye County Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 2
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Bernstein, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ BRAD BERNSTEINBrad Bernstein,President and Principal Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2012
Order entered September 26, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-00638-CR

No. 05-14-00639-CR

ZANTAR LADON KELLY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 282nd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. F13-00158-S, F07-60023-S

ORDER

Appellant’s September 24, 2014 motion to withdraw as appointed counsel on appeal and 

to abate the cases to the trial court for appointment of substitute counsel is GRANTED. 

Kathleen A. Walsh and the Dallas County Public Defender’s Office are removed as counsel of 

record for appellant.

We ORDER the trial court to appoint new counsel to represent appellant in these

appeals. We ORDER the trial court to transmit a supplemental clerk=s record containing the 

order appointing new counsel to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with this order. We will 

reinstate the appeals within thirty days of the date of this order or when we receive the order

appointing new counsel. 

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
### Adams, Kevin (OST) From: 

### Sent: To: 

### Cc:
Subject: Gentlemen, "
.. '_~'- -',~\k~~':.~,~~~!'. " "'~;:;.U,!john Nord <manager@devilslakeairport.com> ...1,', -, ~ -~".i.)',.';c,.:r;

.. - 'J; 1., 'F.Wednesday, January 22, 2014 1:14 PM

Adams, Kevin (OST);Devany, Dennis (OST);Schlemmer, Kevin (OST) 

# 2'i': .',:,r: ::

# 3 /:.\

tiitK!J~hnson'; kienastjim@yahoo.com; 'Terry Johnston'; 'Matthew Leitner'; 'Jimboy1'; kcwanner@nd.gov; 'Wehri, Eileen (Hoeven)'; manager@devilslakeairport.com; 'Nisbet, Jason'; 'Tufte, Jerod E.';'Huerter, Jack (Heitkamp)'; 'Larson, Don (Hoeven)'; 'Lisa Gibbens'; 'Brusegaard, Tom (Hoeven)' EASSelection DVL

The timeline for the selection of SkyWest asthe EAScarrier for DVLneeds to happen assoon as possible. With the current service that is being provided by Great Lakes, one round trip per day with no service Saturdays or six round trips per week, and their plan to further reduce service bygoing to a Part 135 with nine seats per aircraft, has caused DVL travelers to have no confidence in their service or reliability. Evenwith their reduced schedule, we are still experiencing cancelled flights due to pilot shortages. While SkyWest's proposal isto provide one daily flight per day, seven round trips per week, in lieu of the EASrequirement of 12 round trips per week, the community requested that requirement be waived and fully supports their selection asour EASprovider. The opportunity to work with SkyWest and their association with United Airlines issimilar to when DVLwas served by Delta Airlines. The association with a major carrier, the service and reliability, and the interline agreements, resulted in a major increase in boardings and activities at the DVLairport. The boarding numbers, when Great Lakesstarted serving DVL, resulted in an immediate 50% decrease in boarding numbers and the trend continues. The decision to use Denver asthe hub in lieu of MSP isviewed asagood move for DVL.The majority of our travelers go west and Denver isa larger airport than MSPwill allow our travelers much more flexibility in planning their travels. The selection process that the EASGroup usesto determine which airline isselected to serve DVLrequires four carrierselection criteria. 1. Service reliability 2. Contractual and marketing arrangements with a larger carrier at the hub 3. Interline arrangements with a larger carrier at the hub 4. Community views We are of the opinion that SkyWest, and its association with United Airlines, isthe best option for DVLand feel that they far exceed the other bidders when compared to them in the selection criteria. The decision needs to be made sothat SkyWest hasthe opportunity to mobilize asquickly as possible to provide the much needed EASservice to DVLand eliminate our current situation and get DVLback on track and to recovery. Ifthere isconcerns or problems with the SkyWest selection, please provide uswith that information sowe can address the issues. Thanks JOHN 

## JohnM. Nord Airport Manager 1

## Devils Lake Regional Airport 106National Guard St.NW Devils Lake, ND 58301 Tel: 701-662-5833 Fax: 701-662-5133

2
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code), we, Benjamin W. Hulburt, Chief Executive Officer, and Thomas C. Stabley, Chief Financial Officer of Rex Energy Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby certify, to our knowledge, that:



| | (1) | the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 5, 2007



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|/s/ Benjamin W. Hulburt |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas C. Stabley  
|Benjamin W. Hulburt     |  |  |  | Thomas C. Stabley      
|Chief Executive Officer |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Rex Energy Corporation and will be retained by Rex Energy Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT  32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of ENHANCE SKIN PRODUCTS INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Samuel S. Asculai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Dr. Samuel S. AsculaiDate: September 14, 2011

Dr. Samuel S. AsculaiChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Roger D. Burks, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Superior Offshore International,Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date:August 17, 2007           /s/ Roger D. Burks     Roger D. Burks    Chief Financial Officer
#### The People of the State of New York, Respondent, *v.*Jacob M. Lomazow, Appellant.

Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Appellate Part, Second Department,

May 21, 1958.

*Jacob M. Lomasoio,*appellant in person.

*Edward 8. Silver, District Attorney (David Diamond*and *Raymond J. Scanlan*of counsel), for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

Defendant offered to prove that the regulation was unreasonable. This was his sole defense. The Trial Judge refused to permit this proof on the mistaken ground that he lacked the power to determine the reasonableness of the traffic regulation.

While the restriction involved seems at first blush perfectly reasonable to us, we cannot say that defendant had his day in court. Under the circumstances, section 542 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has no application *(People*v. *Savvides,*1 N Y 2d 554; *People*v. *Gerdvine,*210 N. Y. 184) and the interests of justice require a new trial.

Kozioke, P. J., Silver and Rossbach, JJ., concur.

Judgment reversed, etc.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80278-80279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22702]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby

[[Page 80279]]

gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 395 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-753, K2024-46.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22702 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
slgd-ex101_100.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1

 

AMENDMENT TO THE

EXCLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

 

 

This AMENDMENT TO THE EXLUSIVE DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is made and entered as of April 1, 2015 (“Effective Date”), by and between Montagne Jeunesse International Limited (“Supplier”) and Neoteric Cosmetics, Inc. (“Distributor”).

 

RECITALS

 

WHEREAS, Supplier and Distributor entered into that certain Exclusive Distribution Agreement with an effective date of September 15, 2014 (the “Agreement”); and

 

WHEREAS, Supplier and Distributor hereby mutually desire to amend the Agreement as stated below.

 

NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Supplier and Distributor hereby agree to amend the Agreement as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
As of the Effective Date of this Amendment, the reference to “EarthKiss” in the list of Products on page 1 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with “7th Heaven”.




 


	
 
	
2.
	
As of the Effective Date of this Amendment, the reference to “7th Heaven” in Section 1.5 of the Agreement shall be deleted and replaced with “EarthKiss”.




 


	
 
	
3.
	
Effect of this Amendment. In the event of any conflict between the terms set forth in this Amendment and the terms of the Agreement, the terms set forth in this Amendment shall supersede and control.  In all other respects, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement unless otherwise defined herein.




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Supplier and Distributor have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date.

 

 

 


					
	
MONTAGNE JEUNESSE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
	
 
	
NEOTERIC COSMETICS, INC.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
/s/ Keith Rockhill
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Mark Goldstein

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Name:
	
Keith Rockhill
	
 
	
Name:
	
Mark Goldstein

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Title:
	
Sales Director
	
 
	
Title:
	
President and CEO
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986

 

Federal Employee Benefit Programs

 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT LETTER

Number: F-99-03 Date: February 5, 1999

SUBJECT: Assurance Regarding Health Benefit Cost Factor

Financial Management Letter F-98-07 contained the cost factors you need to compute your 1998 cost for

postretirement health benefits. The cost factor for 1998 is $2,529 per employee enrolled in the Federal

Employees Health Benefit Program. To provide assurance for your financial statement auditors

regarding the 1998 cost factor, we offer the enclosure to this letter. Therein, the Program's independent

auditor reports on their application of agreed-upon procedures to the development of the postretirement

health benefits cost factor.

If you have any questions please contact us at 606-0606, or send us an email at finance@opm.gov.

Sincerely,

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Enclosure (Please contact us at above for the enclosure)
EXHIBIT 32.2





STATEMENT
OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER





PURSUANT
TO SECTION 1350 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE




Pursuant
to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, the undersigned, Karen
Hawkins, principal financial officer of Optex Systems Holdings, Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that:




The
Company’s Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 29, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/   Karen
      Hawkins.Karen
      Hawkins, Principal Financial OfficerDated:
      January 11, 2010
#### WINDHAM v. CREECH et al.

No. 2690.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Beaumont.

Feb. 11, 1935.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 27, 1935.

Sanders & McBeroy, of Center, for appellant.

E. B. Lewis, of Center, for appellees

WALKER, Chief Justice.'

Before maturity, appellee W. O. Potts transferred to appellant, Dr. J. H. Windham, a promissory note in the sum of $199.30, payable to him and executed by A. M. and L. S. Creech, by the following indorsement written on the back of the note and signed by Mr. Potts: “I hereby transfer the within note to Dr. J. H. Windham.” Payment was re- ■ fused when the note matured, and this suit was.instituted in county court by appellant against the makers and Mr. Potts as indorser. The makers made no answer. Mr. Potts answered to the effect that the indorsement was written on the back of the note, not for the purpose of making him an indorser, but merely to invest title to the note in appellant, without recourse. The answer was specially excepted to as an attempt to vary the terms of a written instrument by a parol contemporaneous agreement The trial was to a jury, and the issue raised by Mr. Potts’ answer was submitted to the jury and found in his favor and judgment entered accordingly.

 We agree with the contentions of appellant: (a) that the indorsement on the back of the. note did not restrict the liability of Mr. Potts to a mere warranty of title, but the indorsement rendered him personally liable for the payment of the note as an in-dorser; and (b).that parol evidence was not admissible to show that the indorsement was intended to be without recourse. On its facts, Behrens v. Kirkgard (Tex. Civ. App.) 143 S. W. 698 (writ of error refused), is on all fours with the facts of this case. See, also, article 5936, R. S. 1925, section 66, Negotiable Instrument Act.

*632There is no merit in the counter proposition that the note was not duly presented to appellee Potts for payment The note expressly waived presentment

It follows that the judgment of the lower court should be reversed, and judgment here rendered for appellant; and it is so ordered'.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-32-2024]

On May 31, 2024, AbbVie, Inc. submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facilities within Subzone 22S, in North Chicago, Illinois.

                    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (89 FR 51495, June 18, 2024). On September 30, 2024, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this time. The production activity described in the notification was authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, including section 400.14.                

Dated: September 30, 2024.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024-22826 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### Ex parte Harold METZGER.

No. 17804.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 16, 1935.

Frank E. Mann, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of Ex parte John Tally (No. 17803) 86 S.W. (2d) 767, opinion this day handed down. The record in this case and the one in said cause No. 17803 are identical in all respects. The statement of facts in this case is not approved by the trial court. The application for writ of habeas corpus is not accompanied by a copy of the complaint.

The judgment will be affirmed.