alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| (1)   | the      quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Syncfeed Inc. for the quarter      ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | the      information contained in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter      ended September 30, 2008, fairly presents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Syncfeed      Inc.. |
|-----------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/      Yin Chen Kong                                                          |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                            |
| Name:  | Yin      Chen Kong                                                              |
|   |                                                                            |
| Title: | Principal      Executive Officer, Principal      Financial Officer and Director |
|   |                                                                            |
| Date:  | November      11, 2008                                                          |
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3561 

To amend the section 484(r) of the Higher Education Act of 1965 to exclude 

certain marijuana-related offenses from the drug-related offenses that 

result in students being barred from receiving Federal educational loans, 

grants, and work assistance, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2015 

Mr. BLUMENAUER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the section 484(r) of the Higher Education Act 

of 1965 to exclude certain marijuana-related offenses 

from the drug-related offenses that result in students 

being barred from receiving Federal educational loans, 

grants, and work assistance, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Access to Edu5 cation Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3561 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF MISDEMEANOR MARIJUANA POS2 SESSION OFFENSES FROM DRUG-RELATED 

3 OFFENSES RESULTING IN SUSPENSION OF 

4 ELIGIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 

5 FOR HIGHER EDUCATION. 

6 Paragraph (1) of section 484(r) of the Higher Edu7 cation Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1091(r)(1)) is amended by 

8 inserting after ‘‘controlled substance’’ the following: ‘‘, but 

9 not including any misdemeanor offense for possession of 

10 marihuana (as such term is defined in section 102 of the 

11 Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)),’’. 

12 SEC. 3. APPLICABILITY; RESUMPTION OF ELIGIBILITY. 

13 (a) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sec14 tion 2 shall apply to convictions for offenses described in 

15 the matter inserted by such amendment occurring before, 

16 on, and after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

17 (b) RESUMPTION OF ELIGIBILITY.—Any student 

18 whose eligibility for grants, loans, and work assistance 

19 under title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 

20 U.S.C. 1070 et seq.) was suspended under paragraph (1) 

21 of section 484(r) of such Act by reason of a conviction, 

22 before the enactment of this Act, for an offense described 

23 in the matter inserted by the amendment made by section 

24 2 of this Act shall, unless otherwise ineligible for such as25 sistance, resume eligibility upon such date of enactment. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### STOLZ et al. v. WOOD SHERMAN CONST. CO. et al.

No. 9211.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 20, 1933.

Rehearings Denied Jan. 31, 1934

W. O. Bowers, Jr., of Beaumont, and B. D. Tarlton, and H. G. Hart, both of Corpus Christi, for appellants.

L. Hamilton Lowe and Kleberg & Eckhardt, all of Corpus Christi, and Cunningham & Cunningham and Moursund, Johnson, Rogers & Slatton, all of San Antonio, for appellees.

PLY, Chief Justice.

On March 20, 1933, a motion was made by appellants in this case to file the transcript and statement of facts, and thereto was appended an agreement on the part of all ap-pellees except the surety company, that the motion might be granted and the transcript and statement of facts filed as prayed for in the motion. That motion was filed in this court more than five months after the judgment had been rendered and entered in the minutes of the district court. The motion was granted by this court and the recor'd was filed. No motion asking permission to file or to grant further time was made within sixty days from the date of the judgment or the entry thereof.

Since the motion of. appellants was grant-, , ed by this court, two opinions have beem> handed down by the Commission of Appeals , and both adopted by the Supreme Court, in ¡ which it is in effect held that courts of ap- , peal have no authority to entertain motions to file out of time, unless such motions are .i filed within the period of sixty days. In effect, these two opinions settle the question as to the right of the appellate courts to grant . the filing of records out of time as being one . of jurisdiction, and conclusively hold that these courts have no jurisdiction of a case'. where applications to file out of time have not ■been filed during the sixty-day period. This case cannot be distinguished from the referred to decisions of' the Supreme Court. Hunter v. Moore, 62 S.W.(2d) 97, and Red v. Bounds, 63 S.W.(2d) 544, 546, on the ground of the consent of appellees to the filing of the record. If this court had no authority to con- , sider a motion to file after the end of the sixty-day period fixed by the statute, that power could not be increased or completely given by agreement of the parties. In the last case cited the language of the Commis- ’ sion of Appeals is: “It was manifestly the purpose of the amendment to the statute in question to deal exclusively with the subject of the time in which the transcript should be filed in the Court of Civil Appeals and to lim- ' it the authority of the Court of Civil Appeals so as to prevent its extending the timq for filing the transcript in that court unless - application for the extension should be made within the sixty-day period.”

*413In other -words, the question of the right to file the record being one of jurisdiction, the statute (Rev. St. 1925, art. 1839, as amended by Acts 1931, c. 66) granting such jurisdiction cannot be altered or enlarged by agreement of the parties.

The appeal will be dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
BARCLAYS DRYROCK ISSUANCE TRUST



In connection with the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of Barclays Dryrock Issuance Trust for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 (the “Report”), the undersigned,
a duly authorized officer of Barclays Bank Delaware (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

1.       A
review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of August
1, 2012, as amended and restated as of December 17, 2013, by and among Barclays Dryrock Funding LLC, the Servicer, Barclays Dryrock
Issuance Trust and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report
has been made under my supervision.

2.       To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned
has duly executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 29th of March 2019.









| | BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
| | ----------------------
| |                       
| | By:
Exhibit 31.1CERTIFICATIONSI, Bruce L. Bisson, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Torch Energy RoyaltyTrust, for which Wilmington Trust Company acts as Trustee;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made,not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, distributable income and changes in trust corpus of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), or for causingsuch controls and procedures to be established and maintained, for the registrant and Ihave: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based upon such evaluation; and  c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors: a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.In giving the certifications in paragraphs 4 and 5 above, I have relied to the extent I considerreasonable on information provided to me by Torch Energy Advisors Incorporated.     Date: May 15, 2007 By: /s/ Bruce L. Bisson Bruce L. Bisson    Vice President    Wilmington Trust Company
**MEMORANDUM**

DATE: November 20, 2014 TO: Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket ID: OAR - 2013 - 0602 FROM: Rob Lawrence

EPA/Region 6/PD SUBJECT: August 7 , 2014 Call with the Houston Regional Air Quality Planning Advisory

Council regarding the Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants **SUMMARY** A conference call was made by EPA to the Houston Regional Air Quality Planning Advisory Council and the a ttendee s listed below on August 7 , 2014, to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants, which was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES** Participant s : Melissa Bain (Houston - Galveston Area Council), Laura Blackburn (League of Women Voters), Paula Warren (Harris County Judge's office), Ben Carmine (NRG Energy), Cynthia Luong (Leidos), and Ken Fontain (freelance reporter) EPA Participant s: Carl Young, Terry Johnson, and Rob Lawrence
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906****OF THE****SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Ferrellgas Partners, L.P.(the “Partnership”) for the three months ended April 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “SEC”) on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacityand on the date indicated below, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:     1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”); and     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Partnership at the dates and for the periodsindicated within the Report.     The foregoing certification is made solely for purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and is subject to the “knowledge” and“willfulness” qualifications contained in 18 U.S.C. 1350(c).     This certification is being furnished to the SEC and is not to be deemed “filed” with the SECfor purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of Section 18.In addition, this certification is not to be incorporated by reference into any registrationstatement of the Partnership or other filing of the Partnership made pursuant to the Exchange Actor Securities Act of 1933, as amended, unless specifically identified as being incorporated thereinby reference.Dated: June 7, 2007                                                       /s/ James E. Ferrell   James E. Ferrell   Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Ferrellgas,Inc., the Partnership’s general partner                                                      /s/ Kevin T. Kelly   Kevin T. Kelly   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ofFerrellgas, Inc., the Partnership’s general partner    ***** **As required by 18 U.S.C. 1350, a signed original of this written statement has been providedto the Partnership.**
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying amended quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  March 16, 2011
    By:
    /s/ Allan D. Ivie, IVName:
    Allan D. Ivie, IVTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
# United States Court of Appeals **for the Fifth Circuit**

____________ No. 24-10086 Summary Calendar

____________ United States of America, Plaintiff—Appellee , versus Ramon Luna-Arreola, Defendant—Appellant . ______________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:22-CR-377-1

______________________________ Before King, Southwick, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges . Per Curiam: * The Federal Public Defender appo inted to represent Ramon LunaArreola has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Luna-Arreol a has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the releva nt portions of the record reflected

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED September 18, 2024 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 24-10086 Document: 44-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/18/2024No. 24-10086

2 therein. We concur with counsel’s as sessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review . Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED , counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED . See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. Case: 24-10086 Document: 44-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/18/2024
**CERTIFICATION**

**SECTION 302CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Joseph Meuse, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report onForm 10-QSB of Daytona Systems, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosurecontrols and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant'sfourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal controlover financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant's other certifyingofficer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

*/s/ Joseph Meuse*

------------------------------

Joseph Meuse

President and Chief ExecutiveOfficer

August 1, 2008
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Schwab, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) intentionally omitted;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2007



/s/ John R. SchwabJohn R. SchwabChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80270]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22646]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 356 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-704, CP2024-713.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22646 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P