SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 ___________________________________  FORM 10-Q  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934  For Quarter Ended: September 30, 2009 ___________________________________  ROSTOCK VENTURES CORP. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)  Nevada333-14494498-0514250(State or other jurisdiction  of Incorporation)(Commission File Number)(IRS Employer
Identification Number)  3033 Fifth Avenue, Suite 201 San Diego, CA 92103 (Address of principal executive offices)  619-399-3090 (Registrants Telephone Number)  102 Pawlychenko Lane, Suite 34 Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7V 1G9 (Former name or former address, if changed since last report)  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes  X No  .  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes  X                       No  .  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  Large Accelerated Filer.Accelerated Filer .Non-Accelerated Filer .Smaller Reporting CompanyX  Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).      Yes      No  X . Issuers revenues for its most recent fiscal year: Nil  As of November 13, 2009, there were 40,698,273 shares of the registrants Common Stock outstanding. ROSTOCK VENTURES CORP.    Form 10-Q  Part 1.FINANCIAL INFORMATIONItem 1.Financial Statements (Unaudited)3Balance Sheets4Statements of Operations5Statements of Cash Flows6Notes to Financial Statements7Item 2.Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations9Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk16Item 4.Controls and Procedures16Part II.OTHER INFORMATION17Item 1.Legal Proceedings17Item 1A.Risk Factors17Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds17Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities17Item 4.Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders17Item 5.Other Information17Item 6.Exhibits18   2   Index Page  Financial Statements: Balance Sheets (Unaudited) 4 Statements of Expenses (Unaudited) 5 Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) 6 Notes to (Unaudited) Financial Statements 7    3    Rostock Ventures Corp. (A Development Stage Company) Balance Sheets (Unaudited)  September 30,December 31,20092008AssetsCurrent assets:Cash and cash equivalents$14,019$581Receivables280-Total assets$14,299$581Liabilities and Stockholders DeficitCurrent liabilities:Accounts payable$2,703$497Due to shareholder15,131531Notes payable50,00020,000Total liabilities67,83421,028Stockholders deficit:Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 0 shares issued and outstanding--Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized, 40,698,273 shares issued and outstanding40,69840,698Additional paid-in capital53,72353,723Deficit accumulated during the development stage(147,956)(114,868)Total stockholders deficit(53,535)(20,447)Total liabilities and stockholders deficit$14,299$581   See accompanying notes to the condensed unaudited financial statements   4   Rostock Ventures Corp. (A Development Stage Company) Statements of Operations (Unaudited)  NovemberThreeThreeNineNine2, 2006MonthsMonthsMonthsMonths(Inception)EndedEndedEndedEndedtoSeptember 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,September 30,20092008200920082009Operating expenses:Exploration and testing$14,105$7,500$14,105$7,500$43,105Legal and professional expenses1,96311,6214,36612,26031,186Other selling, general and administrative5,1509,54914,80923,34077,997Total Operating Expenses21,21828,67033,28043,100152,288Loss from Operations(21,218)(28,670)(33,280)(43,100)(152,288)Other gain (expense):Interest expense(64)-(64)-(64)Foreign currency exchange gain302072565604396Total Other Gain (Expense)(34)2071925604,332Net Loss$(21,252)$(28,463)$(33,088)$(42,540)$(147,956)Basic and diluted net loss per common share$(0.00)$(0.00)$(0.00)$(0.00)$N/AWeighted average common shares outstanding40,698,27340,698,27340,698,27340,698,273N/A  See accompanying notes to the condensed unaudited financial statements  5   Rostock Ventures Corp. (A Development Stage Company) Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009, September 30, 2008, and  November 2, 2006 (Inception) to September  30, 2009 NineNineNovember 2,MonthsMonths2006 (Inception)EndedEndedtoSeptember 30,September 30,September 30,200920082009Cash flows from operating activities:Net loss$(33,088)$(42,540)$(147,956)Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:Write-off of mining claim costs11,025-22,025Changes in assets and liabilities:Receivables(280)-(280)Accounts payable2,2067,4172,703Foreign currency gain(256)(560)4,396Net cash used in operating activities(20,393)(35,683)(119,112)Cash flows from investing activities:Purchase of mining claim(11,025)-(22,025)Cash flows from financing activities:Cash received for stock issued--43,734Cash received for stock not issued--50,687Borrowings on debt30,000-50,000Advances (to)/ from shareholder14,600-15,131Net cash provided by financing activities44,600-159,552Foreign exchange effect on cash256(560)(4,396)Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents13,438(36,243)14,019Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period58138,128-Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$14,019$1,885$14,019Supplemental information:Cash paid for interest$-$-Cash paid for income taxes$-$-    See accompanying notes to the condensed unaudited financial statements  6   Rostock Ventures Corporation (An Development Stage Company) NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS  1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  Nature of Business Rostock Ventures, Corp. (Rostock) was incorporated November 2, 2006 in Nevada and is a development stage company.  Rostock  was formed to seek business opportunities in mineral exploration.  At September 30, 2009, Rostock had purchased 59 mining claims in the Tintina Gold Belt in Yukon Territory, Canada and is in the process of geologically evaluating and testing these claims as well as raising operating capital and further developing its business plan for future acquisitions.  Basis of Presentation  The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Rostock Ventures, Corp. have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in Rostocks Annual Financial Statements included herein on this Form S-1 filed with the SEC.  In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim period presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for the interim period is not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal period ended December 31, 2008 have been omitted.  New Pronouncements  Effective for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, the Company implemented ASC 855, Subsequent Events (ASC 855,). This standard establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The adoption of ASC 855, did not impact the Companys financial position or results of operations. The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after September  30, 2009 up through November 13, 2009, the date the Company issued these financial statements.  During this period, the Company did not have any material recognizable subsequent events.  In July 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance relating to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification at ASC 105, as the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The codification is effective for interim periods ending after September 15, 2009. All existing accounting standards are superseded as described in ASC 105. All other accounting literature not included in the Codification is non-authoritative. The adoption of ASC 105 did not impact the Companys results of operations, financial position or cash flows.  Reclassifications  Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.  2. Going Concern  The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and liabilities in the ordinary course of business. Operating losses have been incurred each year since inception, resulting in an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2009. This condition raises substantial doubt about Rostocks ability to continue as a going concern. Currently, management is attempting to raise further capital to fund these losses; however, no assurance can be given as to the success of these efforts.  The financial statements of Rostock do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary if Rostock is unable to continue as a going concern.   7    3. Debt  Notes payable consist of proceeds from two loan agreements.  The first loan in the amount of $20,000 is from an individual dated October 29, 2008.  The loan is payable on demand, is non interest bearing and is unsecured.  The second loan is dated September 17, 2009, in the amount of $30,000 and bears interest at 6%.  The loan matures September 18, 2010, along with unpaid interest.  At September 30, 2009 we owed $15,131 to a shareholder, which consisted of net funds advanced.  The funds advanced bear no interest and are unsecured.  4. Equity  On January 14, 2009, Rostock approved a 7:1 forward stock split on its issued and outstanding shares of common stock to the holders of record as of that date.  As a result of the split, each holder of record automatically received six additional shares of Rostocks common stock.  After the split, the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding are 40,698,273 shares for both December 31, 2008 and September 30, 2009.  The accompanying financial statements and related notes thereto have been adjusted accordingly to reflect this forward stock split retroactively.  Preferred stock may be divided into and issued into one or more series by the Board of Directors.  The Board is authorized to determine rights, preferences, limitations and terms of preferred shares.  There were no preferred shares outstanding at September 30, 2009.  From inception (November 2, 2006) through September 30, 2009, Rostock sold 40,698,273 (post forward split) shares of common stock for proceeds totaling $43,734. 28,000,000 (post forward split) of these shares were issued to the founder at $0.01 per share for proceeds of $40,000.  5. Mining Properties  On July 3, 2009, the Company entered into a verbal agreement to acquire 59 mining claims in the Tintina Gold Belt (the Tintina Claims) in Yukon Territory, Canada in exchange for $11,025.   8   ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS  CERTAIN STATEMENTS IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q (THIS "FORM 10-Q"), CONSTITUTE "FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS" WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 (COLLECTIVELY, THE "REFORM ACT"). CERTAIN, BUT NOT NECESSARILY ALL, OF SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF FORWARD-LOOKING TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS "BELIEVES", "EXPECTS", "MAY", "SHOULD", OR "ANTICIPATES", OR THE NEGATIVE THEREOF OR OTHER VARIATIONS THEREON OR COMPARABLE TERMINOLOGY, OR BY DISCUSSIONS OF STRATEGY THAT INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES. SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS INVOLVE KNOWN AND UNKNOWN RISKS, UNCERTAINTIES AND OTHER FACTORS WHICH MAY CAUSE THE ACTUAL RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS OF ROSTOCK VENTURES CORP. ("ROSTOCK", "THE COMPANY", "WE", "US" OR "OUR") TO BE MATERIALLY DIFFERENT FROM ANY FUTURE RESULTS, PERFORMANCE OR ACHIEVEMENTS EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. REFERENCES IN THIS FORM 10-Q, UNLESS ANOTHER DATE IS STATED, ARE TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2009.  GENERAL  Rostock Ventures Corp. was incorporated on November 2, 2006, under the laws of the State of Nevada. We are an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. Our stock trades on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board under the symbol ROSV.  Please note that throughout this Quarterly Report, and unless otherwise noted, the words we, our, us, the Company or Rostock Ventures Corp. refers to Rostock Ventures Corp.  On January 14, 2009, our Board of Directors pursuant to a Board of Directors meeting authorized and approved a forward stock split of seven for one (7:1) of our total issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the Forward Stock Split). The Forward Stock Split was effectuated based on market conditions and upon a determination by our Board of Directors that the Forward Stock Split was in our best interests and of the shareholders. Certain factors were discussed among the members of the Board of Directors concerning the need for the Forward Stock Split, including the increased potential for financing. The intent of the Forward Stock Split is to increase the marketability of our common stock.  The Forward Stock Split was effectuated upon filing the appropriate documentation with NASDAQ. The Forward Stock Split increased our total issued and outstanding shares of common stock from 5,814,039 to approximately 40,698,273 shares of common stock. The common stock will continue to be $0.001 par value.  RECENT DEVELOPMENTS  CURRENT BUSINESS OPERATIONS  On December 22, 2006, we acquired a 100% undivided interest in a mineral claim known as McVicar Lode Mining Claim (the McVicar Claim) comprised of one located claim of 20 acres located in the Yellow Pine Mining District, Clark County, Nevada. Our plan of operation is to conduct mineral exploration activities on the McVicar Claim in order to assess whether it possesses mineral deposits of lead, zinc, copper, silver or gold capable of commercial extraction. Although the Yellow Pine Mining District is less famous than many of the other mining districts of the Great Basin, it nevertheless ranks second only to Tonopah in total Nevada lead and zinc production. During World War I, this district was one of the most productive in the West, but by the end of World War II, only a few mines remained in operation. A description of the McVicar Claim is provided under the heading Description of Property.  We have not earned any revenues to date. We do not anticipate earning revenues until such time as we enter into commercial production of our mineral properties. We are presently in the exploration stage of our business and we can provide no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our mineral claim or that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on our properties, or if such deposits are discovered, that we will enter into further substantial exploration programs. Further exploration is required before a final evaluation as to the economic and legal feasibility is required to determine whether our mineral claim possesses commercially exploitable mineral deposits. See Plan of Operation.   9   McVicar Claim  We entered into a purchase agreement dated December 22, 2006 with Kimberly Sinclair pursuant to which we acquired a 100% interest in the McVicar Claim for cash consideration of $6,000. Collin Sinclair, our President, Secretary, Treasurer and sole Director is not related to Kimberly Sinclair. The McVicar Claim property is comprised of a single located mineral claim with a total area of approximately 20 acres, located on the Yellow Pine Mining District, Clark County, Nevada. The McVicar Claim is located within Sections 11, 12, 13 and 14, Range 57E, Township 25S, at the easternmost portion of the Yellow Pine Mining District of Clark County, Nevada.  In accordance with Nevada mining regulations, the McVicar Claim is in good standing to September 1, 2010. To keep the claim in good standing for additional years, proof of labor on the claim has to be filed each year with the Clark County recorders office in Las Vegas prior to its expiry date.  In addition to Nevada State regulations, federal regulations require a yearly maintenance fee to keep the claim in good standing. In accordance with federal regulations, the McVicar Claim is in good standing to September 1, 2010. A yearly maintenance fee of $125 is required to be paid to the Bureau of Land Management prior to the expiry date to keep the claim in good standing for an additional year. If we fail to pay the required amount of fee of this exploration work, then our mineral claim will lapse on September 1, 2010, and we will lose all interest that we have in the mineral claim.  Location, Climate, Infrastructure and Access  The McVicar Claim is located within Sections 11, 12, 13 and 14, Range 57E, Township 25S, at the easternmost portion of the Yellow Pine Mining District of Clark County, Nevada. The McVicar Claim may be accessed by traveling south from Las Vegas via Interstate Highway 15 for approximately 27 miles, then traveling northwest along Highway 161 for approximately ten miles to Goodsprings. The McVicar Claim may be accessed from Goodsprings by traveling west by gravel road for approximately six miles, and then south along a poor dirt road for approximately four miles.  The McVicar Claim is situated at the northern end of the Sheep Mountain Range, a southerly trending range of mountains with peaks reaching an elevation of 4,184 feet. The McVicar Claim covers the northerly and the southerly facing slopes of an east-westerly trending ridge called the Bonanza Ridge. The local topography is moderately steep sloping with relief in the order of 400 feet from the valley floor. The area is typically desert climate with relatively high temperatures and low precipitation. Vegetation consists mainly of desert shrubs and cactus. Sources of water should be available from local valley wells.  Our McVicar Claim presently does not have any known mineral reserves. The McVicar Claim does not currently have any permanent infrastructure in place. Power to the McVicar Claim will need to be supplied by portable generators brought onto the Property.  History of Exploration  The mines of the Yellow Pine Mining District have been worked primarily for their lead-zinc-silver values; however, a limited amount of gold has been recovered as a by-product of copper-lead-silver mining as well.  The history of the exploratory work performed on the McVicar Claim is not known, however, the property does show indications of localized exploration pits. Our consulting geologist believes that these pits were probably excavated during the mid-to-late-1800s when the Goodsprings concentrator was operating. Reports indicate that there was intermittent ore production at the Root Mine, located approximately one mile northeast of the McVicar Claim, during the period from 1893 to 1952. No production has been reported on the McVicar Claim.  Geological Report and Recommended Exploration Program  We engaged Laurence Sookochoff, P. Eng., to prepare a geological evaluation report on the McVicar Claim. Mr. Sookochoff is a consulting professional engineer in the Geological Section of the Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of the Province of British Columbia, Canada. Mr. Sookochoffs geological evaluation report concludes that the McVicar Claim incorporates some exploratory workings on mineral zones hosting significant zinc values. As the Yellow Pine Mining District has a history of significant zinc production from within veins or replacements of brecciated rocks along fault zones, Mr. Sookochoff has concluded that the McVicar Claim warrants further exploration for potentially economical mineral zones.   10   In his geological report, Mr. Sookochoff, recommended that a four-phase continuing exploration program be undertaken on the property in order to determine locations on which to focus concentrated exploration activities. The four-phase program consists of the following:   PhaseRecommended Exploration ProgramEstimatedStatus CostPhase IProspecting, trenching and sampling to determine geological controls to, and the nature of, the indicated mineralization.$7,500Completed January 2007.Phase IIVLF-EM and soil geochemical surveys along determined extensions of known mineral areas.$7,500Completed December 2008.Phase IIISampling and geological mapping within anomalous zones indicated from the results of Phase II.Company and consultants re-evaluating Phase III work program. Expected to commence in the autumn of 2009.Phase IVTest diamond drilling of the prime correlative anomalous zones.Company and consultants re-evaluating Phase IV work program. Expected to commence after the results of Phase III. * Funding permitting  Current State of Exploration Activities  We have only recently commenced exploration of the McVicar Claim and our exploration activities are currently in the preliminary stages. Our planned exploration program is exploratory in nature and there is no assurance that we will find any mineral reserves on the McVicar Claim.  Phase I Exploration Results.Phase I of our exploration program was completed in January, 2007. The objective of the Phase I exploration program was to trench and sample the known mineral zone to determine the geological controls and the nature of the mineralization. In completing the recommended Phase I program on the McVicar Claim, two trenches were established on the McVicar Claim in locations of mineralization. The measurements of Trench I and Trench II were 30 feet long by three feet wide and two feet deep, and 35 feet long by three feet wide and two feet deep, respectively.  Three grab samples were taken: one from each of the two trenches and one from the dump of a previous exploratory working of unknown dimensions. The samples were submitted for assay at the Assayers Canada laboratory in Vancouver, Canada.  Based on the assay results, our geological consultant concluded that the Phase I program was successful in that the mineralization and the sampling results from the dump of the previous exploratory workings and from Trenches I and II returned encouraging assay results that are indicative of potentially economic zones of mineralization.  Phase II Exploration Results.Phase II of our exploration program was completed in December, 2008. The objective of the Phase II exploration program was to conduct VLF-EM and soil geochemical surveys, which should assist in defining the structural trend and indicated mineral zones and provide information as to the location of potentially economic mineral zones.  Based on the results of Phase II of our exploration program, our geological consultant recommended that Phase III be commenced.  Phase III Exploration Program.The third phase consists of sampling and geological mapping within anomalous zones indicated from the results of Phase II, which will define anomalous areas for drilling in Phase IV. As of the date of this Report we have expended approximately $39,500 in connection with the preparation of the geological report and the exploration of our mineral claim.   11   A decision on proceeding with the planned Phase III exploration program and beyond is currently being re-evaluated by the Company and professional consultants. The decision whether or not to proceed will be based on the recommendations of our geological consultant. The decision of the consultant whether or not to recommend proceeding will be based on a number of factors, including his subjective judgment and will depend primarily on the results of the immediately preceding stage. Additionally, we need sufficient funds to complete the Phase III or Phase IV exploration on the property and may be forced to raise additional capital before completing such Phases.  Amerillo Queen Claim  In December 2007, we, through an agent of the Company (described below), filed a claim for the Amerillo Queen Claim (the Amerillo Claim) with the State of Nevada.  The Amerillo Claim encompasses approximately0.02 of an acre in Clark County, Nevada. In consideration for the prospecting on the Amerillo Claim and the location of the claim, we paid $5,000 to Emil Leimanis, an individual.  We do not have any current plans to continue with the exploration of the Amerillo Claim until after the exploration of our McVicar Claim, funding permitting, if ever.  In accordance with federal regulations, the Amerillo Claim is in good standing to September 1, 2010. A yearly maintenance fee of $125 is required to be paid to the Bureau of Land Management prior to the expiry date to keep the claim in good standing for an additional year.  If we fail to pay the required amount of fee of this exploration work, then our mineral claim will lapse on September 1, 2010, and we will lose all interest that we have in the mineral claim.  Tintina Claims  On July 3, 2009, we entered into a verbal agreement to acquire 59 mining claims in the Tintina Gold Belt (the Tintina Claims) in Yukon Territory, Canada in exchange for $11,025.  The claims, in the aggregate, are a gold prospect which is approximately 3200 contiguous acres and has similar geological characteristics as recent gold discoveries in close proximity.  The Claims lie within the globally prolific mining region known as the Tintina Gold Belt.  RESULTS OF OPERATIONS  Nine Month Period
Ended September 30,
2009 and 2008For the Period from November 2, 2006 (inception) to September 30, 2009STATEMENT OF
EXPENSES DATAOperating ExpensesExploration and testing$14,105$7,500$43,105Legal and professional expenses4,36612,26031,186Selling, general and administrative14,80923,34077,997Loss from Operations(33,280)(43,100)(152,288)Interest expense(64)-(64)Foreign currency  exchange gain2565604,396Net Loss$(33,088)$(42,540)$(147,956)  We have incurred recurring losses to date. Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern and, accordingly, do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and realization of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in operation.  We currently anticipate having a net loss for each quarterly and annual period moving forward until and unless we are able to discover and successfully extract any minerals and generate any revenues through the sale of such minerals, of which there can be no assurance. We expect we will require additional capital to meet our long term operating requirements. We expect to raise additional capital through, among other things, the sale of equity or debt securities.   12   Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Nine Month Period Ended September 30, 2008  Our loss from operations for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was approximately $33,280 compared to loss from operations of $43,100 during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $9,820. During the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we did not generate any revenue.  During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009, we incurred operating expenses of approximately $33,280 compared to $43,100 incurred during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 a decrease of $9,820. These operating expenses incurred during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of: (i) legal and professional of $4,366 and $12,260 respectively; and (ii) selling, general and administrative of $14,809 and $23,340 respectively; and (iii) exploration and testing expenses of $14,105 and $7,500 respectively.  Operating expenses incurred during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 decreased primarily due to the decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses generally include corporate overhead, financial and administrative contracted services, marketing, and consulting costs.  Foreign currency exchange rate recorded during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was $256 and $560 during the nine-month period ended Septemeber 30, 2008.  Interest Expenses for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $64 and $0 respectively.  Therefore, our net loss during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2009 was $33,088 or $0.00 per share compared to a net loss of $42,540 or $0.00 per share during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 40,698,273 for both nine-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, taking into consideration the Forward Stock Split.  Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2009 Compared to Three Month Period Ended September 30, 2008.  Our loss from operations for the three month period ended September 30, 2009 was $21,218 compared to a loss from operations of $28,670 during the three month period ended September 30, 2008, a decrease of $7,452. During the three month periods ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, we did not generate any revenue.  During the three month period ended September 30, 2009, we incurred operating expenses of approximately $21,218 compared to $28,670 incurred during the three month period ended September 30, 2008 a decrease of $7,452. These operating expenses incurred during the three month period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 consisted of: (i) legal and professional of $1,963 and $11,621 respectively ;and  (ii) selling, general and administrative of $5,150 and $9,549 respectively; and (iii) exploration and testing expenses of $14,105 and $7,500 respectively.  Operating expenses incurred during the three month period ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three month period ended September 30, 2008 decreased primarily due to the decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.  Foreign currency exchange rate recorded during the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 was $30 and $207 during the three-month period ended Septemeber 30, 2008. Interest Expenses for the three-month period ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $64 and $0 respectively.  Therefore, our net loss during the three month period ended September 30, 2009 was $21,252 or $0.00 per share compared to a net loss of $28,463 or $0.00 per share during the three-month period ended September 30, 2008. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 40,698,273 for both three-month periods ended September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008, taking into consideration the Forward Stock Split   13   LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES  As of September 30, 2009  As of September 30, 2009, our current assets were $14,299 and our current liabilities were $67,834, which resulted in a working capital deficiency of $53,535. As of September 30, 2009, current assets were comprised of $14,019 in cash and cash equivalents and $280 receivable from a vendor.  The increase in total assets at September 30, 2009 compared to fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 was due to an increase in cash of $13,438.  At September 30, 2009, our total liabilities were $67,834 comprised of: (i) accounts payable and accrued interest of $2,703; (ii) due to shareholder of $15,131; and (iii) notes payable of $50,000. The increase in liabilities a September 30, 2009 from fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 was primarily due to  increases in loans and in amounts due to shareholder. See   Material Commitments.  Stockholders deficit increased from $20,447 as of December 31, 2008 to stockholders deficit of $53,535 as of September 30, 2009.  Cash Flows from Operating Activities  We have not generated positive cash flows from operating activities. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, net cash flows used in operating activities was $20,393, consisting primarily of a net loss of $33,088. Net cash flows used in operating activities was adjusted by  a decrease of $280 in receivables, increase of  $2,206 in accounts payable and $256 in foreign currency loss, as well as an impairment of mining claim costs totaling #11,025.  Cash Flows from Investing Activities  For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, net cash flows used in investing activities was  $11,025 and was attributed to the payment of the acquisition of the Tintina Claims that were acquired on July 3, 2009.  Cash Flows from Financing Activities  We have financed our operations primarily from either advancements or the issuance of equity and debt instruments. For the nine month period ended September 30, 2009, net cash flows provided from financing activities was $44,600 consisting of advances from shareholder and loans.  We expect that working capital requirements will continue to be funded through a combination of our existing funds and further issuances of securities. Our working capital requirements are expected to increase in line with the growth of our business.  PLAN OF OPERATION AND FUNDING  Our plan of operation is to conduct mineral exploration activities on the McVicar Claim in order to assess whether the claim possesses mineral reserves capable of commercial extraction. Our exploration program is designed to explore for commercially viable deposits of lead, zinc, copper, silver or gold mineralization. We have not, nor has any predecessor, identified any commercially exploitable reserves of these minerals on our mineral claims.  We received the geological evaluation report on the McVicar Claim entitled Geological Evaluation Report on the McVicar Lode Mining Claim prepared by Mr. Sookochoff on December 26, 2006. The geological report summarizes the results of the history of the exploration of the mineral claims, the regional and local geology of the mineral claims and the mineralization and the geological formations identified as a result of prior exploration. The geological report also gives conclusions regarding potential mineralization of the mineral claims and recommends a further geological exploration program on the mineral claims. Phase I of the exploration program recommended by Mr. Sookochoff was completed in January 2007, and Phase II of the exploration program recommended by Mr. Sookochoff was completed in December 2008.   14   During the next twelve months, we intend to begin both Phase III and Phase IV of the recommended exploration program, funding permitting, as described above.  We anticipate that we will incur the following expenses over the next twelve months:  CategoryPlanned Expenditures Over
The Next 12 Months (US$)Legal and Accounting Fees$10,000Office Expenses$4,000Consulting Fees$3,000Mineral Property Exploration$52,500TOTAL$69,500  Our current operating funds are not sufficient to meet the anticipated costs of Phases III and IV of our exploration program for the McVicar Claim. Therefore, we will need to obtain additional financing in order to complete our full business plan. As of September 30, 2009, the date of our most recent unaudited financial statements, we had cash on hand in the amount of $14,019.  To date, we have not earned any revenues and we do not anticipate earning revenues in the near future. We currently do not have any arrangements for financing and we may not be able to obtain financing when required. Obtaining additional financing would be subject to a number of factors outside of our control, including the results from our exploration program, and any unanticipated problems relating to our mineral exploration activities, including environmental assessments and additional costs and expenses that may exceed our current estimates. These factors may make the timing, amount, terms or conditions of additional financing unavailable to us in which case our business will fail.  Future Financing  Currently, we do not have sufficient capital resources to meet the anticipated costs of Phases III and IV of our exploration plan. We anticipate relying on equity sales of our common stock in order to continue to fund our business operations. Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to our existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of our equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund our planned business activities. We may also rely on loans from our executive officers and our sole Director; however, there are no assurances that our officers or our sole Director will provide us with any additional funds if and when needed.  Currently, we do not have any arrangements for additional financing. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing if and when required. We anticipate that any additional financing may be in the form of sales of additional shares of our common stock which may result in dilution to our current shareholders.  MATERIAL COMMITMENTS  A material commitment for us during fiscal year 2009 is an aggregate $50,000 due and owing to one of our shareholders. The loan is payable on demand and is non-interest bearing.  PURCHASE OF SIGNIFICANT EQUIPMENT  We do not intend to purchase any significant equipment during the next twelve months.  OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS  As of the date of this Quarterly Report, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.   15   GOING CONCERN  The independent auditors' report accompanying our December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared "assuming that we will continue as a going concern," which contemplates that we will realize our assets and satisfy our liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business.  ITEM III. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.  Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our financial position, results of operations or cash flows due to adverse change in foreign currency and interest rates.  Exchange Rate  Our reporting currency is United States Dollars (USD).  In the event we acquire any properties outside of the United States, the fluctuation of exchange rates may have positive or negative impacts on our results of operations. Although our potential properties are located in Canada, any potential revenue and expenses will be denominated in U.S. Dollars, and the net income effect of appreciation and devaluation of the currency against the U.S. Dollar would be limited to our costs of acquisition of property.  Interest Rate  Interest rates in the United States are generally controlled. Any potential future loans will relate mainly to acquisition of properties and will be mainly short-term. However our debt may be likely to rise in connection with expansion and if interest rates were to rise at the same time, this could become a significant impact on our operating and financing activities. We have not entered into derivative contracts either to hedge existing risks for speculative purposes.  ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures Management is responsible for establishing adequate internal controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission.  As of the end of the period covered by this report, the company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the company's management, including the company's chief executive officer and the company's chief operating officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on this evaluation, the company's chief executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed in the reports that the company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and (ii) information required to be disclosed in the reports the company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to management, including the company's chief executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.  Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting  There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting during or that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the evaluation of those controls by the chief executive officer and principal financial officer.    16   PART II - OTHER INFORMATION  ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS  Management is not aware of any legal proceedings contemplated by any governmental authority or any other party involving us or our properties. As of the date of this Quarterly Report, no director, officer or affiliate is (i) a party adverse to us in any legal proceeding, or (ii) has an adverse interest to us in any legal proceedings. Management is not aware of any other legal proceedings pending or that have been threatened against us or our properties.  We are required by Section 78.090 of the Nevada Revised Statutes (the NRS) to maintain a resident agent in the State of Nevada. Our resident agent for this purpose is Incorp Services, Inc., 375 N. Stephanie Street, Suite 1411, Henderson, Nevada, 89014-8909. All legal process and any demand or notice authorized by law to be served upon us may be served upon our resident agent in the State of Nevada in the manner provided in NRS 14.020(2).  ITEM 1A. RISKFACTORS  Not required.  ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS  1. Issuance of Equity Securities in exchange for services:  None.  2. Convertible Securities:  None.  3. Outstanding Warrants:  None.  4. Sales of Equity Securities for Cash:  None.  5. Other Issuances:  None.  ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.  No report required.  ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS  No report required.  ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION  On October 23, 2009, Mr. Collin Sinclair resigned from all positions with the Registrant, including Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director. As his final act as the sole member of the Registrants Board of Directors, Mr. Sinclair appointed Mr. Luis Carrillo as the Registrants new Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, President, Secretary, Treasurer and Director. Mr. Carrillo accepted such appointment.   17   Mr. Carrillo, age 36, attended Seton Hall University, School of Law where he obtained his Juris Doctorate in 2000, after having graduated from the University of San Diego with a B.A. in Political Science. Mr. Carrillo is licensed to practice law in the States of New York, California and New Jersey.  From 2000 to 2001, Mr. Carrillo served as a Judicial Clerk in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Middlesex County. From 2001 to 2004, Luis focused his practice primarily in civil litigation, where he handled complex commercial and tort litigation spanning a wide spectrum of subject matters including corporate and partnership disputes, complex contract disputes, complex insurance coverage issues, land use matters, tort liability defense and premises liability matters. During this period, Luis also gained extensive appellate experience, while regularly appearing in court for motions, conferences and arbitrations.  Since 2004, Mr. Carrillo has focused his law practice in the areas of corporation finance, corporate and business law, corporate governance, business transactions, and securities. He has significant experience representing buyers and sellers in the structuring and negotiation of complex mergers and acquisitions of both public and privately-held companies. Mr. Carrillo has also worked closely with growth companies raising equity or debt capital in private placements and other transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the federal and state securities laws. These transactions have included the structuring and negotiation of rights, privileges, and preferences of common stock, preferred stock, convertible debt, warrants and other equity or debt arrangements (including preemptive rights, anti-dilution protections, liquidation and dividend preferences, registration rights, rights of first refusal, co-sale rights, puts, calls, voting rights and board representation, capital calls and other rights). Mr. Carrillo has represented companies in structuring and negotiating joint-venture, partnership and other strategic arrangements, licensing and development agreements, distribution and supply agreements, shareholder agreements, option and warrant agreements, employment and consulting agreements, and non-competition, nondisclosure and proprietary rights agreements.  ITEM 6. EXHIBITS  Index of Exhibits The following exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q:  ExhibitNumberDescription of Exhibit3.01Articles of Incorporation(1)3.03Bylaws(1)31.01Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(5)31.02Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(5)32.01CEO and CFO Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act(5) _____________  (1)Filed as an exhibit to our Form SB-2 Registration Statement filed with the Commission on July 30, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.  *All exhibits are numbered with the number preceding the decimal indicating the applicable SEC reference number in Item 601 and the number following the decimal indicating the sequence of the particular document.   SIGNATURES  In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.  ROSTOCK VENTURES CORP.DATED: November 13, 2009By: /s/ Luis CarrilloLuis CarrilloChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)and Principal Financial Officer   18