alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of Mary J. MacKechnie, Individually and on Behalf of All Other Employees of the Board of Education, City School District of New Rochelle, Similarly Situated, Petitioner, against Board of Education, City School District of New Rochelle, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Westchester County,

April 10, 1958.

*927
      *Curtis F. McClane*for petitioner.

*Murray C. Fuerst*for respondent.

Elbert T. Gallagher, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding for an order in the nature of mandamus.

"While there has been a technical violation of section 3104 of the Education Law in that petitioner and the other employees of respondent in behalf of whom this proceeding is brought have not been placed upon the salary steps of the salary schedule represented by the teachers’ years of service and transfer credits, they are nonetheless receiving salaries in excess of the statutory mínimums and in excess of the salaries to which they would be entitled under the Education Law had they been placed upon the proper steps. It is not apparent, therefore, in what way petitioner or other teachers ‘ ‘ similarly situated ’ ’ have been damaged by respondent’s failure to comply fully with section 3104.

Moreover, the court is of the opinion that to grant the relief prayed for would work an injustice. The salaries set forth in the salary schedule were adopted by respondent at the same time and in conjunction with certain “ Conditions of Transfer.” It was pursuant to these ‘ ‘ Conditions ’ ’ that the teachers were placed on salary steps lower than those representing their years of service and transfer credits. Were they now to be placed upon higher salary steps in disregard of the “ Conditions of Transfer ” and paid the salaries specified for such steps they would receive annual payments far in excess of those contemplated by respondent when the salary schedule was adopted. Petitioner seeks to obtain an unfair advantage of the statutory violation by demanding that she be paid according to the salary schedule and at the same time seeking to avoid the limitations adopted in conjunction therewith.

The issuance of an order in the nature of mandamus is to a large extent discretionary. *(Matter of Andresen*v. *Rice,*277 N. Y. 271.) It may be denied even where a clear legal right is shown to exist. *(Matter of Blade*v. *O’Brien,*264 N. Y. 272.) The court may consider *“*the hardship and injustice to the defendant, the conduct of the applicant and the interest of third persons. Although the order is classed as a legal remedy, equitable principles largely control its issuance.” *(Matter of Coombs*v. *Edwards,*280 N. Y. 361, 364.)

*928It is unnecessary to consider all the motions made by respondent since, on the basis of the foregoing, the court is of the opinion that the petition should be dismissed on the merits. Settle order on two days’ notice.
#### TURBYVILLE v. STATE.

No. 14246.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 27, 1931.

L. D. Ratliff, Dennis P. Ratliff, and L. D. Ratliff, Jr., all of Haskell, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

The prosecution was under article 1377, P. C. (1925), amended by Acts of the Second Called Session of the 41st Legislature (1929) chapter 26, page 41 (Vernon’s Ann. P. C. art. 1377). The act in substance provides that, whoever shall enter upon the inclosed lands *67of another without the consent of the owner, and “shall catch or take or attempt to catch or take, any fish,” etc., shall he guilty of an offense. Conviction resulted, with punishment assessed at a fine of $10:

The sufficiency of the complaint and information was challenged by motion to quash upon. various grounds; one being that the charge against appellant was uncertain, it being alleged in the disjunctive. That the state’s pleading was defective in the particular mentioned is supported by many authorities cited in section 503, Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed under the present pleading.
EXHIBIT
32.2


















CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad
Bernstein, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ BRAD
      BERNSTEINBrad
      Bernstein,President
      and Chief Financial OfficerMay
      14, 2009
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Tad M. Ballantyne, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Tad M. BallantyneTad
      M. BallantyneChief
      Executive OfficerDate:  May
      8, 2009
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3453 

To clarify the regulatory treatment of Federal Home Loan Bank products. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Mr. DAVID SCOTT of Georgia (for himself and Mr. LUCAS) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To clarify the regulatory treatment of Federal Home Loan 

Bank products. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Home Loan 

5 Bank Product Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK PROD7 UCTS. 

8 (a) Section 1a(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act 

9 (7 U.S.C. 1a(2)) is amended— 

10 (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘and’’; 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3453 IH

1 (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period 

2 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

3 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

4 ‘‘(D) is the Federal Housing Finance 

5 Agency for any Federal Home Loan Bank (as 

6 defined in section 2 of the Federal Home Loan 

7 Bank Act).’’. 

8 (b) Section 402(a) of the Legal Certainty for Bank 

9 Products Act of 2000 (7 U.S.C. 27(a)) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ at the end of paragraph 

11 (6); 

12 (2) by striking the period at the end of para13 graph (7) and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(8) any Federal Home Loan Bank (as defined 

16 in section 2 of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act).’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Fourth Court of Appeals **San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 22

- 00057

- CR

Ryan Xavier GARCIA

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court

, Atascosa County, Texas Trial Court No. 19

- 08

- 0206

- CRA Honorable Russell Wilson , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE CHAPA

, JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ , AND CHIEF JUSTICE MARION (Ret

. ) (sitting by assignment)

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the t rial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED December 6, 2023.

_____________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
---

EXHIBIT 32.1 / 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jaskarn Samra, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kranti Resources,
      Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Kranti Resources, Inc.                                                                 

Dated: May 12, 2010

| | Jaskarn Samra                      
| | -------------------------------------
| | Jaskarn Samra                        
| | Chief Executive and Financial Officer
| | Kranti Resources, Inc.               

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kranti
Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Kranti Resources, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# Official Journal L 83/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 83 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5827 March 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 83

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5827 March 2015

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2015/475 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2015/476 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the measures that the Union may take following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters | 6 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2015/477 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on measures that the Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures | 11 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2015/478 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on common rules for imports | 16 |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2015/479 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on common rules for exports | 34 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2015/475 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the safeguard measures provided for in the Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Republic of Iceland

1

*

Regulation (EU) 2015/476 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on the measures that the Union may take following a report adopted by the WTO Dispute Settlement Body concerning anti-dumping and anti-subsidy matters

6

*

Regulation (EU) 2015/477 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on measures that the Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures

11

*

Regulation (EU) 2015/478 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on common rules for imports

16

*

Regulation (EU) 2015/479 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2015 on common rules for exports

34

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 13



CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of RedHill Biopharma Ltd. (the
“Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned officers of the Company certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to such officer's knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Dated: February 25, 2016





|/s/ Dror Ben-Asher                                    |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Dror Ben-Asher                                        |  | 
|Chief Executive Officer                               |  | 
|                                                      |  | 
|/s/ Ori Shilo                                         |  | 
|Ori Shilo                                             |  | 
|Deputy Chief Executive Officer Finance and Operations |
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


November 1, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 349


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect our evaluation of such
Securities as of close of business on October 31, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth in the Standard Terms
and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as the party performing
the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-220137) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO                              


Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Group

1920 1954 1959 1986 

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 96-707 Date: September 1, 1996 

September 11, 1996 Satellite Broadcast

The next HRM: Information Highway Governmentwide Satellite Broadcast is on

Wednesday, September 11, 1996, from 1:00 to 2:30 pm, Eastern Time.

The 90-minute broadcast is another in the series sponsored by the Interagency Advisory

Group Satellite Broadcast Consortium. Segments scheduled for the broadcast include --

 HR in Cyberspace

 Ethically Speaking

 The OMB Report

 Myths and Truths

 Legislative Update

 Issues Update

The "Myths and Truths" segment will be an interview with William E. Flynn, III,

Associate Director of OPM's Retirement and Insurance Service, who will address some

of the longstanding myths and misunderstandings concerning retirement and insurance. 

Abby Block, Chief of the Insurance Policy and Information Division, Office of

Insurance Programs, Retirement and Insurance Service, will be interviewed about the

new FEHB regulations covering employees in a leave without pay status. These

regulations were effective on August 21, 1996. Several other items in the broadcast

also should be of special interest to staff who work in the benefits area.
The coordinates are shown below. Additional information about this, and other

broadcasts in the series, can be found in the Communications/Satellite Info Forum on

the OPM Mainstreet electronic bulletin board. Mainstreet can be reached at 202-606-

4800. For additional information, call 202-606-1800.

C-Band Dishes KU-Band Dishes

Satellite Telstar Satellite SBS-6

Transponder channel 21 transponder channel 9

Polarity Vertical Polarity Horizontal

Downlink Frequency 4120 Downlink Frequency 11921

Audio Subcarriers 6.2 & 6.8 Audio Subcarriers 6.2 & 6.8

Orbital Location 89 degrees Orbital Location 74 degrees

west west

Mary M. Sugar, Chief

Agency Services Division
#### CRANE v. STATE.

No. 17662.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 26, 1935.

W. J. Townsend, of Lufkin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is unlawfully selling squirrels ; the punishment, a fine of $25.

The prosecution proceeded under article 884, P. C., which reads in part as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person to sell or offer for sale * * * any * * * wild game animal, dead or alive,

or any part thereof, protected by this chapter, except as hereinafter provided. This article, and all other articles in this chapter, shall apply to any * * * animal coming from without this State; and in prosecutions for violations of this chapter it shall be no defense that such * * * animal was not taken or killed within this State.”

We quote the charging part of the complaint as follows: “Charles Crane on or about the 26th day of October, A. D. 1934, and before the making and filing of this complaint, in the county of Angelina and state aforesaid, did then and there unlawfully sell and offer for sale to C. H. Doak wild game, to-wit squirrels.”

The information follows the complaint.

Article 892, P. C., reads as follows: “Wild deer, wild elk, wild antelope, wild Rocky Mountain sheep, wild black bear, and wild gray and red squirrels, cat squirrels or fox squirrels, are hereby declared to be game animals within the meaning of this Act.”

We quote from Webster’s International Dictionary as follows: “Among the common North American squirrels are the gray squirrel * * * and its black variety; the fox or cat squirrel * * * which is a large species and variable in color, the southern variety being frequently black, while the northern and western varieties are usually gray or rusty brown; the red squirrel * * * ; the striped, or chipping, squirrel * * *; and the California gray squirrel. Several other species inhabit Mexico and Central America. * * * ”

Appellant insists that the complaint and information are fundamentally defective in failing to specify the kind of squirrels alleged to have been sold. We think this contention should be sustained, as it appears that there are several species not enumerated in article 892, supra. Under the express terms of article 884, supra, the sale, etc., of wild game animals is restricted to such animals as are protected by chapter 6 of title 13, P. C. (article 871 et seq.). As to squirrels, said chapter protects wild gray and red squirrels, and cat squirrels or fox squirrels. Article 892, supra. It follows that the general allegation that the game animals sold consisted of squirrels is insufficient.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 09**  **- 8166** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

EDWIN F. ALVANEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District o f Maryland , at Greenbelt

. Deborah K. Chasanow , Chief District Judge. ( No. 8:07

- cr - 00326

- DKC

- 2 )

Submitted : April 22, 2010 Decided: April 27, 2010

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and KING and AGEE , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Edwin F. Alvanez, Appellant Pro Se. James Marton Trusty, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Edwin Alvanez appeals the district co urt ’ s order denying his motion to retain a handwriting specialist . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny Alvanez's motions for transcript at government expense
and to retain a handwriting specialist, and affirm fo r the reasons stated by the district court. *

AFFIRMED United States v. Alvanez , No. 8:07

- cr - 00326

- DKC

- 2 (D. Md. Nov. 16, 2009) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

a rgument would not aid the decisional process.

* We decline to consider issues Alvanez raises in his informal brief which are not related to his present appeal.
#### CARR v. STATE.

No. 18120.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1936.

Chandler & Chandler, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.