alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 of IMH
Secured Loan Fund, LLC;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the  financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2008
    /s/ Steven DarakSteven DarakChief Financial Officer, Investors Mortgage
Holdings, Inc., manager of IMH Secured Loan Fund,
LLC
<PAGE>
 
                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                               Pinkerton's, Inc.

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                     (In thousands, except per share data)

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION>

                                                           Year Ended 
                                 -----------------------------------------------------------------
                                  December 27,             December 29,              December 30,
                                      1996                     1995                      1994
                                 --------------           --------------            --------------
<S>                               <C>                      <C>                       <C>  
Net income (loss)                 $     12,450             $     10,500              $    (10,242)
                                 ==============           ==============            ===============

Weighted average number of
shares outstanding                       8,353                    8,312                     8,265

Dilutive effect of outstanding
stock options                              178                       39                        23
                                 --------------           --------------            ---------------

Weighted average number of 
shares, as adjusted, for 
calculation of earnings (loss)
per share                                8,531                    8,351                     8,288
                                 ===============          ===============           ===============

Net income (loss) per common 
share                             $       1.46             $       1.26              $      (1.24)
                                 ===============          ===============           ===============
</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3447 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a hydroelectric 

project. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Ms. FOXX introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of a hydroelectric project. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. EXTENSION. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

5 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

6 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to the Federal En7 ergy Regulatory Commission project numbered 12642, the 

8 Commission may, at the request of the licensee for the 

9 project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with 

10 the good faith, due diligence, and public interest requireVerDate Sep 11 2014 02:33 Sep 09, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3447.IH H3447

emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3447 IH

1 ments of that section and the Commission’s procedures 

2 under that section, extend the time period during which 

3 the licensee is required to commence the construction of 

4 the project for up to 3 consecutive 2-year periods from 

5 the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued 

6 by the Commission. 

7 (b) REINSTATEMENT OF EXPIRED LICENSE.—If the 

8 period required for commencement of construction of the 

9 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior to the 

10 date of the enactment of this Act, the Commission may 

11 reinstate the license effective as of the date of its expira12 tion and the first extension authorized under subsection 

13 (a) shall take effect on the date of such expiration. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
----- Forwarded by Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US on 02/18/2011 03:16 PM

-----

From: Brian Shrager/RTP/USEPA/US

To: Cortney_Higgins@OMB.eop.gov

Cc: Jim Eddinger/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ

 Wayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

Date: 01/25/2011 09:04 PM

Subject: Fw: Re: Fw: Spreadsheets for Boiler MACT

Cortney,

Attached is the cost summary spreadsheet that you requested from Jim.

Please let me know if you have any questions.

Thanks!

Brian

From: "Higgins, Cortney" [Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov]

Sent: 01/24/2011 05:14 PM EST

To: Jim Eddinger

Cc: Robertj Wayland

Subject: FW: Spreadsheets for Boiler MACT

Hi Jim,

Do you have an updated version of this spreadsheet for the final rule,

or a spreadsheet that provides the breakdown of compliance costs by

industry/3 digit NAICS codes?
Regards,

Cortney

From: Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Eddinger.Jim@epamail.epa.gov

 ]

Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 1:43 PM

To: Higgins, Cortney

Subject: Spreadsheets for Boiler MACT

Cortney,

As I indicated in the briefing yesterday, here are several spreadsheets

for the Boiler MACT in regards to the MACT floor analysis and the

control costs. One is a zip file, so let me know if you have any

problems opening these files. We are still preparing the actual

technical memos.

I will be sending spreadsheets on the Boiler Area Source rule in

another email.

Jim

_______________

James A. Eddinger

Energy Strategies Group

Sector Policies and Programs Division

919-541-5426

(See attached file: CostSummary-existing major with solidsubcat

010411.xlsx)
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In  connection  with the Report on Form 10-Q of North  American  Gold & Minerals
Fund (the  "Company")  for the period ended  August 31, 2010,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I Ronald
Yadin Lowenthal,  as Chief Executive  Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: October 20, 2010                By: /s/ Ronald Yadin Lowenthal
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Ronald Yadin Lowenthal
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          Chief Financial Officer

This  certification   accompanies  each  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
`
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

I, Johnny R. Thomas, the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of Consolidation Services, Inc. certify that:

 

1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidation Services, Inc. for the period ended March 31, 2008;

 

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) 

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

(b) 

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) 

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

 

5.

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: May 15, 2008

 

CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, INC.

 

/s/ Johnny R. Thomas

Johnny R. Thomas, Chief Executive

Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
`
#### BANKERS’ MORTGAGE COMPANY OF TOPEKA, KANSAS, Plaintiff in Error, v. Maurice E. CHAMBERS, Defendant in Error.

No. 1387.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

May 25, 1933.

Rehearing Denied June 22, 1933.

Frank Oltorf, of Marlin, for plaintiff in error.

Cecil R. Glass, of Marlin, for defendant in error.

GALLAGHER, Chief Justice.

This suit originated in the justice court, precinct No.'l, Falls county, in which court Maurice E. Chambers, hereinafter called plaintiff, recovered a judgment against the Bankers' Mortgage Company of Topeka, Kansas, hereinafter called defendant, for the sum of $125.44. Defendant prosecuted an appeal from that judgment. The Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland was surety on its appeal bond. The county court of that county being without civil jurisdiction, the appeal was filed in the district court. A trial there resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendant and said surety on its appeal bond for the sum. of $125.44, from which judgment defendant has sued out a writ of error to this court.

The pleadings of the parties, the testimony introduced, and the issues of law involved in this case are all substantially the same as in the case of Bankers’ Mortgage Co. of Topeka, Kansas, v. Ewell A. Rogers (Tex. Civ. App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 593, this day decided.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
United States

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 13-802 Date: October 03, 2013

Subject: The Federal Flexible Spending Account Program (FSAFEDS): 

2014 Administrative Fees

Purpose

To notify agencies that the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program (FSAFEDS) reserve 

account fee and administrative fees will change for the 2014 benefit period.

Background 

Administrative Fees 

Agencies pay administrative fees to ADP Benefit Services KY, Inc. (formerly known as SHPS, 

Inc. - the third party administrator under contract with the Office of Personnel Management) on 

behalf of their employees enrolled in FSAFEDS. 

Dependent-Care Flexible Spending Account (DCFSA) Administrative Fee 

The current DCFSA administrative fee will be reduced from $1.25 per DCFSA per month 

to $1.00 per DCFSA per month. 

Health-Care Flexible Spending Account (HCFSA) Administrative Fee

The current HCFSA administrative fee will be reduced from $1.35 per HCFSA per month 

to $1.00 per HCFSA per month. 

Reserve Account Fee

Agencies pay the reserve account fee to OPM on behalf of their employees enrolled in 

FSAFEDS. For 2014, the monthly reserve fee will remain unchanged at $.25 per HCFSA per 

month. 

ADP Benefit Services KY, Inc. will send out the first of two annual invoice packages in February 

2014, reflecting the above fees. Thank you in advance for your prompt payment. 

Sincerely,

John O’Brien 

Director

Health and Insurance
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 12-303 Date: January 2012

Subject: Interim IRS Guidance on Informational Reporting to Employees of the Cost of 

Their Group Health Insurance Coverage - Mandatory for 2012 Forms W-2 

Background 

On January 3, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued Notice 2012-9, “Interim Guidance 

on Informational Reporting to Employees of the Cost of Their Group Health Insurance Coverage”, 

(“Notice”), which provides interim guidance to employers regarding the new Form W-2 

requirement to report the cost of coverage under an employer-sponsored group health plan. Notice 

2012-9, restates and amends the guidance provided in Notice 2011-28, including the information 

on how to report, what coverage to include and how to determine the cost of the coverage. This 

requirement was added to the Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) by the Affordable Care Act, Public 

Law No. 111-148. 

Informational Reporting Requirement By Agencies 

The Notice requires employers to report the aggregate cost of applicable employer-provided health 

care coverage on Form W-2, Wage and Tax Statement. This generally includes coverage under 

any group health plan, including the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program. The 

reporting to employees, via Form W-2, is for their information only. The reported amount is 

intended to inform employees of the cost of their health coverage. The amount reported does not 

affect the employee’s tax liability, as the value of the employer contribution to health coverage 

continues to be excludable from an employee’s income, and it is not taxable. 

The Notice is applicable beginning with 2012 Forms W-2 (i.e., forms required for the calendar 

year 2012 that employers are generally required to furnish to employees by the end of January 

2013), and Forms W-2 for later years. The reporting requirement was optional for 2011 Forms 

W-2 (i.e., Form W-2s provided to employees in January 2012). 
.

For Further Information 

Agencies should review the Notice as it provides interim guidance that generally is applicable 

beginning with 2012 Forms W-2. This interim guidance is applicable until further guidance is 

issued. The link to the IRS Notice is: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-12-09.pdf. If you have 

any questions about this requirement, please refer to the instructions in the IRS Notice. 

 

Emily Dean 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
#### MILLER v. STATE.

No. 15617.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

L. W. Sandusky and R. H. Ratliff, both of Colorado, Tex., for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CALHOUN, J.

The offense, burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for 2 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals hás been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
##### 



1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.
  
  
 \s\ Bruce L. Bisson

Bruce L. Bisson, Vice President
#### HUNTER v. STATE.

No. 17703.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 4, 1935.

Robert K. Crain, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for tapping a pipe line; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for 2 years.

It has been made known to this court by proper affidavit that the appellant, pending his appeal, was shot and killed in Gregg county, Tex., on November 24, 1935. The death of the appellant deprives this court of jurisdiction of the appeal. It is therefore abated.
EXHIBIT 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of  Southern Bella, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.







Date: November 1, 2010
By:
/s/ Viola HeitzViola Heitz, President, Chief Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer and Director