alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The intent of this diagram is to provide 

you with a general understanding of 

how the Federal Employees Health 

Benefits (FEHB) Program, the Federal 

Employees Dental and Vision Insurance 

Program (FEDVIP) and the Federal 

Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS) work together. For specific 

information on each Program, visit 

www.opm.gov/insure. 

Circle ‘Round Your Benefits
 

How to Get the Most Value from the Programs 


FEHB 

Comprehensive medical insurance 

Dental benefits may be included 

Vision benefits may be included 

FEHB and FSA 

Save money on eligible out-of-pocket 

expenses. When you have FEHB and an 

FSA, you can use money in your FSA 

to pay for your eligible FEHB 

out-of-pocket expenses (such as 

copayments and coinsurance) 

and qualified medical costs 

and health care expenses 

that your FEHB may 

not cover (such as 

chiropractic or 

hearing 

aids). 

FEHB and FEDVIP 

Lower your out-of-pocket costs on 

dental and vision expenses with FEDVIP 

coverage in addition to FEHB 

coverage. Your FEHB plan will be 

the first payer for any 

dental and/or vision benefit 

payments they may 

also cover. FEHB, FEDVIP, and FSA 

Save money on eligible out-of-pocket dental and vision 

expenses. When you have FEHB, FEDVIP, and an FSA, your 

FEHB plan will be the first payer of any benefit payments. 

You can use your FSA to pay for any eligible out-of-pocket 

expenses not covered by your FEHB or FEDVIP plan. 

FSA and FEDVIP 

Save money on eligible out-of-pocket dental and vision 

expenses after FEDVIP payments. When you have an 

FSA and FEDVIP, you can use money in your FSA 

to pay for your eligible FEDVIP out-of-pocket 

expenses (such as copayments and 

coinsurance) and eligible expenses 

that your FEDVIP plan 

may not cover. 

FSAFEDS 

Save money using tax-free 

dollars. You can put aside $250 

to $2,500 in pre-tax dollars per 

year to pay for eligible health care 

services and items for you and 

your family that are not paid 

by your health, dental, or 

vision insurance. 

*Information on a 

Dependent Care FSA is at 

www.FSAFEDS.com 

FEDVIP 

Dental - comprehensive 

dental insurance (such as free 

semi-annual cleanings), 

and/or 

Vision - comprehensive vision 

insurance (such as yearly 

eye exam) 

July 2012
<PAGE>
FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Exhibit 23.1 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS








     We have issued our report dated January 25, 1996, accompanying the
consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference of First
Commonwealth Financial Corporation and subsidiaries on Form 10K for the year
ended December 31, 1995.  We hereby consent to the Incorporation by
reference of said reports in the Registration Statement of First
Commonwealth Financial Corporation and subsidiaries on Form S-8 
(File No. 33-55687) and the related prospectus.



                                                  /S/Grant Thornton LLP  

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 21, 1996
EX-35.2
(logo) Deutsche Bank
1761 East St.Andrew Place
Santa Ana, CA 92705-4934

Tel 714 247 6000
Fax 714 247 6009

ANNUAL STATEMENT AS TO COMPLIANCE


The undersigned, David Co, a Director of Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas,
as the Trustee (a "Certifying Servicer") under the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2012 (the "Agreement"), by and among, RBS
Commercial Funding Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,
as Master Servicer, Torchlight Loan Services, LLC, as Special Servicer, Trimont
Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Trust Advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator, and Custodian,
and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee here by certifies in
accordance with Section 11.11 of the Agreement:

A) A review of such Certifying Servicer's activities from June 28, 2012 (the
"Closing Date") to December 31, 2012 and of such Certifying Servicer's
performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer's supervision
and
B) That, as to the best of such officer's knowledge, based on such review, such
Certifying Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement, in
all material respects from the Closing Date to the end of such calendar year.

DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
as Trustee

/s/ David Co
BY: David Co
Title: Director
Date: March 1, 2013
United States Office of Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 23-801 Date: February 13, 2023 

Subject: The Federal Flexible Spending Account 

Program (FSAFEDS): 2023 Administrative Fees

Purpose

To notify agencies that the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS) administrative fees will change for 2023. The reserve account 

fee will remain the same for the 2023 benefit period. FSAFEDS fees are 

detailed in Benefit Administration Letter 21-801.

Background

Administrative Fees 

Agencies pay administrative fees to HealthEquity, the third-party 

administrator under contract with the Office of Personnel Management 

(OPM), on behalf of their employees enrolled in FSAFEDS. To maintain 

market competitiveness and retain an adequate Reserve Account, OPM 

determines annually if administrative fees will be discounted for participating 

agencies.
Benefits Administration Letter 23-801 

2 

Dependent-Care Flexible Spending Account (DCFSA) Administrative 

Fee 

The DCFSA administrative fee is $2.82 per DCFSA per month. For the entire 

2023 benefit period, OPM will discount that fee to $1.55 per DCFSA per 

month.

Health-Care Flexible Spending Account (HCFSA) Administrative Fee

The HCFSA administrative fee is $2.82 per HCFSA per month. For the entire 

2023 benefit period, OPM will discount that fee to $1.55 per HCFSA per 

month.

Limited Expense Health Care Flexible Spending Account (LEX HCFSA) 

Administrative Fee 

The LEX HCFSA administrative fee is $2.82 per LEX HCFSA per month. For 

the entire 2023 benefit period, OPM will discount that fee to $1.55 per LEX 

HCFSA per month.

Reserve Account Fee

Agencies pay the reserve account fee to OPM on behalf of their employees 

enrolled in FSAFEDS. For 2023, the monthly reserve fee will remain 

unchanged at $.25 per HCFSA per month.

The anticipated schedule for the task order and quarterly invoices is as 

follows: 

• February 2023: Initial Task Order Request distributed 

• March 2023: Agencies submit fully executed task orders 

• April 2023: Q1 2023 (January-March) quarterly invoice distributed 

• July 2023: Q2 2023 (April-June) quarterly invoice distributed 

• October 2023: Q3 2023 (July-September) quarterly invoice distributed 

• November 2023: Q3 2023 (October-November) Task Order Catch-up 

Request distributed 

• December 2023: Agencies submit fully executed Task Order 

Modifications (as applicable) 

• January 2024: Q4 2023 (October-December) quarterly and Catch-up 

invoices distributed 
Benefits Administration Letter 23-801 

3 

HealthEquity will send out the initial task order request in February. To 

receive the first quarterly invoice in April 2023, the agencies must submit an 

executed task order by March 2023. Subsequent invoices will be sent 

quarterly. 

Thank you in advance for your prompt payment.

Sincerely, 

Laurie Bodenheimer

Associate Director

Healthcare and Insurance
Long Term Care Partners, LLC 

P.O. Box 797 

Greenland, NH 03840-0797 

Date <Unique ID> 

Name 

Address 

Address 

Dear Name, 

Thank you for your participation in the Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP). As the 

Program’s administrator, we would like to inform you of some upcoming changes. 

Contract award 

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) awarded a new seven-year contract to 

John Hancock Life & Health Insurance Company (John Hancock) to provide insurance coverage to all 

FLTCIP enrollees. We have enclosed formal documentation regarding this change and encourage you 

to save it with your benefit booklet and schedule of benefits. 

Please be assured that your coverage continues without interruption. No action is needed at this time, 

but please read on for information about what to expect in the next few months. 

Premium increase for certain classes of enrollees 

OPM and John Hancock have determined that a premium rate increase is necessary for enrollees with 

the Automatic Compound Inflation Option (ACIO) whose age at purchase was 69 or younger. This 

premium increase will take effect on January 1, 2010. It will not apply to enrollees with ACIO whose 

age at purchase was 70 or older or to enrollees who have the Future Purchase Option (FPO). 

[Note: our records indicate you have FPO, so this premium rate increase does not apply to you.] 

[Note: our records indicate you have ACIO and that your age at purchase was XX.] 

Next steps 

This fall, we will send you a letter providing information about changes to your premiums (if any) and 

the opportunity to switch to new benefit options available under the Program. 

If the premium increase affects you, your letter will include a personalized option for changing your 

benefits to avoid the increase. Your benefits will not change unless you choose to make changes. 

Once we send your letter, we will be happy to discuss your options in detail. Until then, you can: 

• read more about the new contract and the premium increase at www.LTCFEDS.com/contract. 

• visit www.LTCFEDS.com to set up an online account to ensure we have your current address for 

mailing your personalized letter this fall and to review your current coverage. 

If you do not have Internet access, please call to receive a copy of Frequently Asked Questions at 

1-800-582-3337 (select option #1) (TTY 1-800-843-3557) Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. to 

6:00 p.m. Eastern time. 

Sincerely, 

Paul Forte, Chief Executive Officer 

Long Term Care Partners, LLC 

Enclosure
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, J r. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk August 6, 2009

p0720 

# Order

August 6, 2009

138860

MARK FENTON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138860 COA: 279673 Wayne CC: 06-626263-NF FARM BUREAU GENE RAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 31, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question pr esented should be reviewed by this Court prior to the completion of the proceedings or dered by the Court of Appeals.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Joseph Egberts, Defendant.

County Court, Kings County,

July 16, 1958.

*William Leibowits*for defendant.

*Edward S. Silver, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

Hymah Barshay, J.

The defendant, while confined in Sing Sing prison under a sentence heretofore imposed upon him by another court, was indicted by the County Court of Kings County for robbery in the first degree, assault in the second degree and grand larceny in the first degree. The indictment was filed on May 18,1956 and notice of that fact was given to the defendant on June *4,*1956 by the filing of a warrant with the Avarden of the institution wherein he was confined. No action Avas taken by the prosecutor to move this indictment for trial until April 30,1958 when for the first time, the defendant entered a plea of not guilty upon arraignment. The defendant noAV moves to dismiss the indictment on the ground that he was denied a speedy trial pursuant to the mandate of section 668 of *958the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court accorded him a hearing. On the evidence adduced, this motion is granted. The court finds that the defendant was not responsible for, nor did he acquiesce in, or consent to any delay of his prosecution. “ There is not so much as a suggestion that defendant procured, caused, consented to, acquiesced in or * * * condoned the past

delay (Code Crim. Pro., § 668; *People*v. *White,*2 N Y 2d 220, 223-225; *People*v. *Godwin,*2 A D 2d 846, affd. 2 N Y 2d 891; *People*v. *Prosser,*309 N. Y. 353, 359-360). *Nov*has the District Attorney made any attempt to offer *‘*good cause ’ for its occurrence.” *(People*v. *Segura,*12 Misc 2d 279, 280; *People*v. *Mudra,*12 Misc 2d 438.)

Submit order.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

peer air:

Your request f carefully

connlderedby this request

aa followm e quo;e Prom your

r 8n oyinnton, r dtem 3fhll.e

i)2* aoynton 8 uutjagunoiir.

duo to e prcv:ous uo to L&e sect that IL lnaiion or ~~o,ooo.i~o to eat&bi~iah ental B,tatioa

at Siephen F. Austin Coflego, .he phmed to request .x&at 1 make this hurrkx'wlp LO Uaohlngcon,aa Presidentof Our Board of Regents.

"I acquiesced,ia apite of the fact thai previouseng~cmenxi iXui to bo canceileii, end I am glad to repoN. chat subsequently.ihiaapproprlatlonyas mde by our Uni$cd Scams Congrese, lihkh will help in the rehabilitation of' wme oe**_**

**i P** 

**1**

**1. i** 

! 

### .,, x%Tl

thousandoof ccrm of QUP East 'i'exe8 Wnds loa&+ usalcea through coiX sro2ion.

Qy reason for br.U@.ng this to your attention la that ng good Prlet?ld, Cowtmllcr Worge g. Chcpheril, dbes i2ot tslleva the per tiem **ia** applicableexcept in atWmda3ce at vegulaw board meetings. MI?. J. II. vlnelp, Auditor

‘of step&an p. Auatdn College,who mole ne about thia,~ atatod that 'this

%e th# first ocwmicn t&&L the per diemof & board D)t?be?? cn afficlalbuetiena had been questionedIn kie 22 years uith tha college.

* Seation 6 of Article2547, V~FA~‘IP hnnota%d Text18 Civil3tatutas,raferrtigto the Board of Rcgmta of the state Fcochers

Go~legcaof i&i8 State, providoaas follonsr "The board aballmeek eech gcer at Austin, on ths first Wonday ln &3.y, 0P a.8 soozk themaf2er aa praor.loabl.e,

for cuha

traneactionof buslnesnpertaining to the affai?e OS tha State ucnrjsl s;chools, and at euch othor time end Places ae n 11~~jo19t.y Of the menbars of the board deem nec~~eax+y for I;he WdXs~e of mild co2legeo. Each md cvczy mmber of saidbof33d **shall,** ~r3:cc?ivc fLvs dollara per day for the time sp?,nC

atGcndIr~ Lbe W2etigEY **p~?OQ~bti f4r**  in thfa law, md &I addition themto the **mno~zt of**  their travelingoxgcneoia, said cozpensa'~cbou

to be Paid to the soveml nzabex **OP** OK? lxmri? OUL **0:** she apprsgM.acLon

Tar the Gupi)oPt

and ma%ni;enance

of the mid 3te.t~

?each$rn*Col.l.sses aa the bow1 snsy dhxL,". 1
/ 

,11 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 

FILED 

APR 2 4 2012 

Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy 

Courts for the District of Columbia 

Robert Louis Salter Jr., 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

Charles Samuels Jr., 

Defendant. 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Civil Action No. 12 ( J644 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs pro se complaint seeking class certification 

and his application to proceed in forma pauperis. The Court will grant the application and will 

dismiss the complaint. 

Plaintiff is a prisoner incarcerated at the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, 

Texas. He seeks to bring a class action against the Bureau of Prisons on behalf of federal 

prisoners nationwide for alleged "overcrowding within the federal prison system." Compl. at 2. 

Plaintiff "asserts a claim of systemic unconstitutionality resulting from overcrowding at the 

F.C.I.-Texarkana (LOW) prison and contends that these conditions are representative of 

overcrowding through the entire Federal prison system" in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 

!d. 

Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes one or more members of a 

class to sue on behalf of all members provided that, among other specified conditions, the 

representative party "will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class." Fed. R. Civ. P. 

3 
23(a)(4). Prose plaintiffs may not represent other prose plaintiffs in federal court, however. 

See 28 U.S.C. § 1654; Oxendine v. Williams, 509 F.2d 1405 (4th Cir. 1975) ("[I]t is plain error to 

permit this imprisoned litigant who is unassisted by counsel to represent his fellow inmates in a 

class action.") (citation omitted); Debrew v. Atwood, No. 10-0650 (JDB),- F. Supp. 2d -, 

2012 WL 898786 (Mar. 19, 2012), at *8 (federal prisoner proceeding prose "is not qualified to 

appear on behalf of another person") (citing Georgiades v. Martin-Trigona, 729 F .2d 831, 834 

(D.C. Cir. 1984)) (other citation omitted); see also Maldonado v. Terhune, 28 F. Supp. 2d 284, 

288 (D.N.J. 1998), quoting Caputo v. Fauver, 800 F. Supp. 168, 170 (D.N.J.l992), affd, 995 

F.2d 216 (3d Cir. 1993) ("Courts have consistently held that a prisoner acting prose 'is 

inadequate to represent the interests of his fellow inmates in a class action."'). 

Plaintiff seeks the appointment of class counsel, but his claim that the conditions at FCI 

Texarkana are "representative" of those throughout BOP's system is too speculative to warrant 

appointing counsel from this Court's Civil Pro Bono Panel to, in effect, commence plaintiffs 

action. If plaintiff were to proceed on his own behalf, this venue would not be proper for 

litigating his claim predicated on alleged overcrowding at FCI Texarkana. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1391 (b )(2) (designating the proper venue under the circumstances presented as the 'judicial 

district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred ... 

. "). A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum Opinion. 

Date: April i..J_, 2012 

()&~&. '4-#! 

United States strict Judge 

2
#### STALLINGS v. MOORE.

No. 12972.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

April 20, 1934.

Rehearing Denied June 1, 1934.

R. C. Puller, W. M. Short, and James E. Whitmore, all of Port Worth, for appellant.

Robert B. Violette and Lawrence Tarlton, both of Port Worth, for appellee.

DUNKLIN, Chief Justice.

Testimony of the defendant was sufficient to require the court to submit to the jury the defense pleaded of false-and fraudulent representations inducing him to execute the contract. According to his testimony the alleged misrepresentations on which he relied were of the quality and fitness of the machine sold and concerning which defendant was wholly ignorant, and a finding of the jury in defendant's favor thereon would have supported the defense of failure of consideration, either in whole or in part. 10 Tex. Jur. pp. 153, 154, §§ 90-91; 6 Tex. Jur. p. 963, § 283, and decisions there cited; 24 R. C. L. pp. 333, 334, §§ 621, 622; American Nat. Bank v. Cruger, 91 Tex. 446, 44 S. W. 278. Especially so since the evidence showed that plaintiff has taken back the machine upon defendant’s complaint that it was not of the quality represented, and that, too, after plaintiff had made repeated efforts to remedy its defects. 10 Tex. Jur. p. 393, § 223; 24 Tex. Jur. p. 276, § 555 ; 66 C. J. p. 1379; 2 Black on Rescission and Cancellation, §§ 417, 528, 531, 535.

And the result of such misrepresentations would be the same, regardless of the motives of plaintiff’s agent in making them. 20 Tex. Jur. p. 42, § 23, and p. 44, § 24; also p. 83, § 50.

 And plaintiff would be bound by such misrepresentations of the agent even in the absence of authority from him to make them; and defendant could, at his option, elect to rescind the contract or claim damages for the fraud. Delaware Punch Co. v. Reinarz (Tex. Civ. App.) 61 S.W.(2d) 135. writ of error refused ; Reed v. Hester, 44 S.W.(2d) 1107 (Tex. Com. App.); Carson v. Taylor (Tex. Civ. App.) 238 S. W. 261.

For the error in the action of the court in granting plaintiff’s motion for an instructed verdict for plaintiff, thus depriving defendant of the right to a trial by the jury of the defense pleaded, the judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
# L_2019254EN.01007601.xml

| 3.10.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 254/76 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 254/76

---

NOTE TO THE READER

The Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 238/2017 has been withdrawn and therefore left blank.

---
EMAIL 2 – VERIFY YOUR FEGLI OPEN SEASON CHANGES

SEND THIS EMAIL: During the Week of October 30, 2017

===================================================================== 

To: [Agency Name] Employees 

Subject: Verify Your FEGLI Open Season Changes

Please take this opportunity to review your leave and earnings statements to confirm that your 

September 2016 FEGLI Open Season election went into effect. For most employees, FEGLI 

Open Season changes went into effect October 1, 2017, and your new premiums would first 

appear on your [insert agency-specific pay date] pay date. If you are not sure when your FEGLI 

Open Season changes went into effect, contact [insert agency-specific contact information].

You can confirm that your FEGLI premium deductions are correct by using the FEGLI 

Calculator or the FEGLI Premium Tables. 

If you believe your FEGLI Open Season election should have taken effect but has not, or if you 

believe that you inadvertently cancelled or reduced coverage in your FEGLI Open Season 

election, contact us immediately at [insert agency-specific contact information] so we can 

investigate. 

Some employees may have completed their FEGLI Open Season elections incorrectly by signing 

only for Basic and for new coverage, accidentally canceling their current optional coverage in 

the process. We are authorized to correct this error and reinstate your erroneously cancelled 

optional coverage if you notify us in time. For most employees whose coverage went into effect 

October 1, the deadline for requesting this correction is November 11, 2017. If you are not sure 

when your deadline is, contact [insert agency-specific contact information].

Not everyone’s election became effective October 1. It depends on when you meet pay and duty 

status requirements.

For information on how to increase life insurance coverage outside a FEGLI Open Season, or for 

general information about the FEGLI Program, visit www.opm.gov/life. 

Thank you!