alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derold L. Kelley,
Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:           May
10, 2010


/s/Derold
L.
Kelley


Derold L.
Kelley


President,
Secretary/Treasurer and Director
US
Bank(logo)



| | Global Corporate
    Trust     
| | -------------------------------
| | 190 S. LaSalle Street, 7thFloor
| | MK-IL-SL7C                     
| | Chicago, IL 60603              
| |                                
| | usbank.com                     



Annual
Statement of Compliance

UBS-Barclays
Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C2



VIA:
EMAIL



UBS
Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.



1285
Avenue of the Americas



New
York, New York 10019



Attention:
Nicholas G. Galeone



Email:
nicholas.galeone@ubs.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com



| | Re: | The
                                         Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 1,
                                         2012 among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank,
                                         National Association, as master servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, successor in
                                         interest to CWCapital Asset Management LLC, as special servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance
                                         LLC, as operating advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate
                                         administrator, paying agent and custodian
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I,
Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:



(1)
A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period")
and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement have been made under my supervision; and



(2)
To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement
in all material respects throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized
terms used but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.



Date:
February 28, 2022



| | U.S. Bank National Association,
    as Certificate Administrator
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------
| |                                                                 
| | By:                                                             
| |                                                                 
| |
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Patrick F. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of Sientra, Inc. (the
Company), hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2017, to which this
Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                        
|-------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  | /s/ PATRICK F.
WILLIAMS
|                     |  | Patrick F. Williams    
|                     |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates,
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Sientra, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
#### Har-Lee-Kay Realty Corp., Plaintiff, *v.*Providence Washington Indemnity Co., Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Nassau County,

April 9, 1958.

*J esse Dillon*for defendant.

*Lawrence Cohen*for plaintiff.

L. Barron Hill, J.

Defendant seeks to dismiss the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice for its failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Defendant is an insurance company in the business of issuing liability policies. Plaintiff purchased one of defendant’s policies covering certain real property owned by it. The period of the policy ran from February 9,1956 to February 9, 1957.

The plaintiff sold the house and was thereafter sued for an accident occurring therein on November 15, 1957. The complaint alleged that the accident was caused by the negligence of plaintiff in installing certain cabinets which loosened and fell on the head of the claimant in the other action.

Plaintiff claims that it installed the cabinets while defendant’s policy was in effect, i.e., during the period from February 9, 1956 to February 9, 1957, and therefore, defendant was under a duty to defend plaintiff in the lawsuit and is liable to plaintiff for attorney’s fees or else must defend the suit.

The complaint states that a copy of the contract of insurance is attached, but defendant maintains that none was attached to the copy served on it, that the facts alleged in the complaint are insufficient without the contract, and the complaint should be dismissed. On this motion a copy of the contract has been supplied.

The policy provides in part:

*775“IV. Policy Period, Territory: This policy applies only to *accidents*which occur during the policy period within the United States. * * * ”

“Coverage B — Bodily Injury Liability — Except Automobile : To pay on behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death at any time resulting therefrom, sustained by any person and *caused by*accident.”

“II. Defense, Settlement, Supplementary Payments: With respect to such insurance as is afforded by this policy, the company shall:

‘ ‘ (a) defend any suit against the insured alleging such injury, sickness, disease or destruction and seeking damages on account thereof, even if such suit is groundless, false or fraudulent ”. (Emphasis supplied.)

It is apparent, therefore, that plaintiff was insured against *accidents*occurring during the policy period. It was not insured against its negligence occurring during the policy period. If the latter is the type of policy plaintiff desired, it did not purchase such a policy. It was insured against accidents, but on the face of the complaint, the accident did not occur during the policy period. It follows that defendant was under no duty to defend the lawsuit for the accident occurring on November 15, 1957.

Motion granted. Settle order.
Exhibit 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe have issued our reports dated August 20, 2007, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule of Orion Marine Group, Inc. contained in the Registration Statement on FormS-1/A and related Prospectus. We consent to the use of the aforementioned reports in theRegistration Statement on Form S-1/A and related Prospectus, and to the use of our name as itappears under the caption “Experts.”/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLPHouston, Texas
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Group

1920 1954 1959 1986 

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 96-412 Date: October 17, 1996 

SUBJECT: 1996 FEHB Open Season: Withdrawal of Healthsource South 

 Carolina

This is to inform you that Healthsource South Carolina (codes M3 and Z8) is withdrawing

from the FEHB Program effective December 31, 1996. Unfortunately, the FEHB Guides

had already gone to print when the plan made its decision to withdraw, so the plan's name

appears in the Guides. Code M3 services the Charleston and upstate areas; Code Z8

services the Columbia and Florence areas. 

The plan will send notices of its withdrawal to its enrollees. However, it is important to

remember that enrollees in the plan who fail to choose another plan during open season will

have no health benefits for 1997. Consequently, if you have employees in the areas served

by the plan, we ask that you notify them directly of the plan's withdrawal.

Thank you for your assistance.

 Abby L. Block, Chief

 Insurance Policy and 

 Information Division
Exhibit 31.1

Certification

I, Gary MacDonald, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of MIPSolutions, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.

4.

The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c)

presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors:

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date: August 20, 2010





|                                                   
|---------------------------------------------------
|/s/Gary MacDonald                                  
|Gary MacDonald
Chief Executive Officer and Director
#### Gloria Letson, an Infant, by Charles Letson, Her Guardian ad Litem, et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*William J. De Long et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Cattaraugus County,

June 23, 1958.

*Kelly & Monighan*for plaintiffs.

*W. Parh Catchpole*for William J. De Long, and another, defendants.

Matthew J. Jasen, J.

This is a motion for an order vacating so much of the judgment of no cause of action in favor of the defendants, William James De Long and Hugh Kenneth De Long and against the plaintiffs, as awards the sum of $100.45 costs, in favor of the said defendants against the said plaintiffs, which judgment was entered in the office of the County Clerk of the County of Cattaraugus on the 28th day of March, 1958.

The plaintiffs contend that the judgment should be vacated inasmuch as said defendants failed to move this court for an award of costs in their favor pursuant to section 205 of the Civil Practice Act.

Section 205 reads: “No infant or guardian ad litem for an infant shall be liable for costs unless specially charged therewith by the order of the court. ’ ’

However, the defendants contend that they were entitled to costs of course under section 1475 of the Civil Practice Act for the reason that the plaintiff, Charles Letson, sought to maintain an action individually against the defendants, apart and distinct from the cause of action he sought to enforce in his capacity as guardian ad litem.

It seems clear that section 205 of the Civil Practice Act has no application to such a judgment insofar as it relates to a plaintiff suing in his individual capacity, even though he join such a cause of action with one inhering in an infant plaintiff *656and sought to be enforced by the self-same person in his capacity as guardian ad litem. *(Giebner*v. *Retz,*253 App. Div. 752.)

This court finds the defendants are entitled to costs of course pursuant to section 1475 of the Civil Practice Act, as to plaintiff Charles Letson individually and that section 205 of the Civil Practice Act has no application as to him, inasmuch as he unsuccessfully sought to maintain a claimed individual cause of action against the defendants, apart and distinct from the cause of action he sought to enforce in his capacity as guardian ad litem.

Motion denied.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

JUSTIN CORLISS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 459 MAL 2021

Petition for Allowance of Appeal

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 30th day of November, 2021

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
# C_2014030EN.01001001.xml

| 1.2.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 30/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/10

---

2014 EIB Prize in economics: Innovation, market structure and competitiveness

2014/C 30/05

The topic for the 2014 EIB Prize is ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Competitiveness’. The prize will be awarded for research conducted to assess the interaction between company size and market structure and the impact of investment decisions on innovation and productivity in different sectors. Special consideration will be given to work comparing the European experience with that of other large advanced or emerging economies.

Please click here for more details and nomination forms.

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

July 30, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
133758 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan DAWN SCHMIDT, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 133758 COA: 276304 Oakland CC: 2006-077141-NH ROB SHAFINIA, a/k/a BROB SHAFINIA, D.O., and CITY MEDICAL, P.C., Defendants-Appellants.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the March 23, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should now be reviewed by this Court.

l0723 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

July 30, 2007

Clerk
#### BARNES v. STATE.

No. 18502.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

M. H. Gibson, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*451MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is forgery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary -for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence heard on the trial is not brought forward for review. Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense charged, and waived a jury upon the trial. No complaint of the procedure has been presented by bill of exception or otherwise.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 31.1**CERTIFICATION**          I, Johnny R. Thomas, the Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) ofConsolidation Services, Inc. certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Consolidation Services, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) * for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) *:  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and
-16-

 
 (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.     Date: August 14, 2007 CONSOLIDATION SERVICES, INC.