alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**     I, Alex A. Bucher, Jr., certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on    Form 10-K    of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not    contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state    a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made,    in light of the circumstances under which such statements were    made, not misleading with respect to the year covered by this    annual report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this annual report,    fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the years presented in this annual report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are    responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls    and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the year in which this annual    report is being prepared;     b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this annual    report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the year covered by    this annual report; and     c. disclosed in this annual report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a. all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. /s/  Alex    A. Bucher, Jr.    Alex A. Bucher, Jr.    Chief Executive Officer and President of Eagle Rock Energy    G&P, LLC, General Partner of Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.,    General Partner of
#### PHILLIPS v. STATE.

No. 19087.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 9, 1937.

R. G. Allen, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for theft; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The enhanced penalty for the third conviction, as provided in article 63, P.C., was-invoked.

The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment appears regular and properly presented.' No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)
 In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. Todd Huskinson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:
 (1)
 The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2)
 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
  ​
            ​
            ​
            ​
            /s/ W. Todd Huskinson
              ​
              Name: W. Todd Huskinson
                Date:  March 1, 2022
            ​
 
 1
#### THOMAS v. STATE.

No. 19076.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1937.

Jim H. Letts and S. F. Hill, both of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*290MORROW, Presiding Judge.

. Robbery by assault is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of ten years.

The State’s witness Charles L. Love testified that on February 14, 1936, he worked at a certain filling station in the city of Houston; that between 2 and 3 o’clock in the morning the appellant appeared with a pistol which he pointed at the witness and said: “You know what I want; let me have it.” When Love gave appellant what money he had on his person, the appellant said: “That is not all you have. * * * Let me have it or else.” Love then opened the drawer and gave appellant the money it contained, which amounted to $6.50. Love testified that he gave the appellant the money because he was afraid his life would be lost if he refused to comply with the appellant’s command.

Kelly, a police officer of the city of Houston, testified that he arrested the appellant on a certain street about 3:25 o’clock in the morning; that upon searching the appellant the officer found a loaded pistol on his person.

The appellant did not testify. Neither did he introduce any witnesses in his behalf.

No complaints of the rulings of the trial court have been presented by bills of exception or otherwise.

The evidence is quite sufficient to sustain the finding of the jury.

The judgment is affirmed.
1 

## NUMBER 13 - 1 1 - 00283 - C V COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

IN RE MID - CONTINENT CASUALTY COMPANY

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Garza, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam 1

Relator, Mid

- Continent Casualty Company, filed a petition for writ of mandamus and a motion for emergency relief on May 4 , 2011

. That same day, the Court granted the motion for emergency relief and stayed the trial court’s order of April 27, 2011, requiring the production of discovery, pending further order of this Court, or until the case is finally decided. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52 .10(b) . The Court request ed that the real

1 See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(d) ( “ When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ” ); T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).2

parties in interest, Jose E. Garcia and Mary A. Garcia, by and through counsel, file a response to the petition for writ of mandamus. See id. R. 52.4, 52.8. On May 27, 2011, the parties to this original proceed ing notified the Court that they had reached a settlement regarding the underlying litigation. Accordingly, they jointly requested that we abate this original proceeding for thirty days to allow them to prepare the final settlement and dismissal paperwork . The Court granted the motion and abated this original proceeding. We directed the parties to file an appropriate motion with the Court requesting consideration of this cause, the dismissal of this cause, or an extension of time to finalize the settlem ent. On June 29, 2011, r elator filed a n unopposed motion to dismiss this original proceeding on grounds that the parties have resolved and settled the underlying litigation. Relator requests that we dismiss the petition and order the parties to the
proc eeding to bear their own costs. The Court, having examined and fully considered the unopposed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted in part and denied in part

. Accordingly, the stay previously imposed by this Court is LIFTED. See id. R. 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). Relator’s motion is DENIED insofar as we do not issu e judgments in conjunction with original proceedings, and accordingly, as a general rule,
do not assess costs in such cases. See id. R. 43.4. Relator’s motion is GRANTED
insofar as we DISMISS this original proceeding without regard to the merits.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the 12 th day of Ju ly , 2011.
**Exhibit 32.1****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dolan Media Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, James P. Dolan, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: September 14, 2007 By:  /s/ James P. Dolan    James P. Dolan    Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6018

DEMETRIC GRAY PEARSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

STUART O. SIMMS, Secretary; CAPTAIN NEDER;

STEVEN ROACH; JEFF NIMES; DAVID LANCASTER,

Lieutenant; STEVE ZOLLNER; WILLIAM SONDERVAN,

Doctor,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (CA02-3647-8-RDB)

Submitted: February 19, 2004 Decided: February 26, 2004

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetric Gray Pearson, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr.,

Attorney General, Gloria Wilson Shelton, Stephanie Judith Lane

Weber, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Demetric Gray Pearson appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Pearson v.

Simms, No. CA-02-3647-8-RDB (D. Md. filed Dec. 11, 2003 & entered

Dec. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunrise Holdings Limited
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Holdings
Limited.








Date:
      April 29, 2010
            
            
            /s/
      Shaojun SunShaojun Sun, Chief Financial
Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3168 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3168

   To amend title 23, United States Code, to include bridges on the 
                 National Highway Performance Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2015

   Mr. Sean Patrick Maloney of New York (for himself and Mr. Zeldin) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                   Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 23, United States Code, to include bridges on the 
                 National Highway Performance Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Bridges Investment Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ELIGIBLE PROJECTS.

    Section 119(d)(2) of title 23, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following:
                    ``(Q) Construction, reconstruction, resurfacing, 
                restoration, rehabilitation, and preservation of, or 
                operational improvements for, a bridge not on the 
                National Highway System if such bridge is on the 
                Federal-aid Highway System''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 14.1



















April 30, 2015











Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V.


Prolongación Paseo de la Reforma No. 500


Módulo 208


Lomas de Santa Fe


México, D.F.


C.P. 01219








Re: Related Party Transactions Item 7.B.2. Form 20-F








Ladies and Gentlemen:




I am the General Legal Director of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V., a Sociedad Anónima Bursátil organized and existing under the laws of the United Mexican States (the “Company”), and have acted as counsel to the Company in connection with the reportable related-party transactions under Item 7.B.2 of Form 20-F. This opinion is being furnished to you pursuant to Instruction 3 to Item 7.B. of Form 20-F.





Banco Santander (México), S.A., Institución de Banca Multiple, Grupo Financiero Santander México, subsidiary of the Company ("Banco Santander"), is duly organized and validly existing and holds the proper authorization to operate as a credit institution (institución de banca múltiple), organized and existing under the laws of the United Mexican States.





Pursuant to the foregoing, Banco Santander is subject to the Mexican banking laws, rules and regulations, and in particular the Credit Institutions Law (Ley de Instituciones de Crédito) ("LIC"). Banco Santander is also under the supervision of the National Banking and Securities Commission (Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores) ("CNBV”) as well as the Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (Secretaría de Hacienda y Crédito Público).





In connection with the foregoing, I have reviewed the laws, rules and regulations that I have deemed appropriate, and in this regard, section 142 of the LIC as recently amended (formerly article 117), prohibits credit institutions to disclose information on the deposits, services or any other type of operations to any other person than the corresponding depositor, creditor, holder or beneficiary or its legal representatives, as well as any Mexican judicial authority as a result of a subpoena and to tax authorities by request of the CNBV.





Based on the foregoing, I am of the opinion that Banco Santander, a subsidiary of the Company, cannot disclose to the Company the information required to be set forth in Item 7.B.2 of Form 20-F, because such disclosure would conflict with the LIC.






















This opinion is limited to matters of Mexican law in force on the date hereof. I express no opinion with respect to the law of any other jurisdiction.





This opinion is given as at the date hereof and I disclaim any obligation or undertaking to advise any person of any change in law or fact which may come to our attention after the date hereof.








Very Truly Yours,By:
/s/ Fernando Borja MujicaName:
Fernando Borja MujicaTitle:
General Legal Director

Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V.
# Official Journal C 111A/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.111.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 111A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5618 April 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2013.111.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 111A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5618 April 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2013/C 111A/01 | Notice of open competitions — Public health | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2013/C 111A/01

Notice of open competitions — Public health

1

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 5 | |
| --- | --- |
| 27 | (RO) |
| 29 | |
| 33 | |
| 34 | |
| 36 | (DA) |
| 41 | (BG) |
| 43 | (EN) |
| 49 | (ET) |
| 50 | (HU) |
| 51 | (SL) |
| 54 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 58 | (EN/GA) |
| 75 | |
| 81 | |
| 82 | |
| 88 | (BG) |
| 89 | (CS) |
| 94 | |
| 104 | |
| 109 | |
| 111 | |

5

27

(RO)

29

33

34

36

(DA)

41

(BG)

43

(EN)

49

(ET)

50

(HU)

51

(SL)

54

(DE/EN/FR)

58

(EN/GA)

75

81

82

88

(BG)

89

(CS)

94

104

109

111

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EXHIBIT  32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of ENHANCE SKIN PRODUCTS INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31, 2011, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dr. Samuel S Asculai, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.  1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Dr. Samuel S AsculaiDate: March 17, 2011

Dr. Samuel S AsculaiChief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required under this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 27, 2014



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|SLM Funding LLC
1

Hunt, Jeff

From: Robert Ukeiley [rukeiley@igc.org]

Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 10:49 AM

To: R10-Public Comments

Cc: Jessica Yarnall Loarie; Hunt, Jeff; Jan Hasselman; Aubrey Baldwin; 

nathaniel.shoaff@sierraclub.org

Subject: Washington: Kent, Seattle, and Tacoma Second 10-Year PM10 Limited Maintenance Plan, 

Docket #: EPA-R10-OAR-2013-0713

Attachments: Wa PM10 maintenance commentsvfin.pdf; Ex 5 Fox Final ACDP Comments 8.12.13 ECopy.pdf; Ex 4 AERMOD_Modeling_Morrow_vfin.pdf; Ex 2 - BNSF NW coal trains.pdf; Ex 1 

20130606_AIRQUEST_Kotchenruther_coal_trains.pdf

Dear Mr. Hunt:

Attached, please find Sierra Club’s comments on EPA’s proposed approval of the second 10‐year PM10 maintenance

plan for Kent, Seattle and Tacoma.  Ex. 3 to the attached comments is a very large filel so I send that in a separate email.

If you have an difficulties with these documents or have any other questions, please do not hesitate to ask.   

Respectfully submitted,

Robert Ukeiley

Law Office of Robert Ukeiley

507 Center Street

Berea, KY 40403

Tel: 859‐986‐5402

rukeiley@igc.org

Counsel for Sierra Club
UNITED STATES NAVY-MARINE CORPS 

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J.R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, K.J. BRUBAKER

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RYAN R. MCINTOSH

CORPORAL (E-4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 201400331

SPECIAL COURT-MARTIAL

Sentence Adjudged: 6 June 2014.

Military Judge: Col D.M. McConnell, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Marine Aviation 

Logistics Squadron 14, MAG 14, 2d MAW, Cherry Point, NC.

Staff Judge Advocate's Recommendation: LtCol J.J. Murphy, USMC.

For Appellant: Maj Emmett S. Collazo, USMCR.

For Appellee: Mr. Brian K. Keller, Esq.

26 November 2014

---------------------------------------------------

OPINION OF THE COURT 

---------------------------------------------------

 

 After careful consideration of the record, submitted without 

assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved 

by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military 

Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

 

For the Court

 

 

 

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
ACCEPTED12-15-00246-CVTWELFTH COURT OF APPEALSTYLER, TEXAS11/13/2015 12:09:37 PMPam EstesCLERK