Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E1 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### ATTACHMENT E: POST-INJECTION SITE CARE (PISC) AND SITE CLOSURE
PLAN

Facility Information

Facility Name: FutureGen 2.0 Morgan County CO 2 

### Storage Site

IL -137-6A-0003 (Well #3 )

Facility Contacts: Kenneth Humphreys, Chief Executive Officer,

FutureGen Industrial Alliance, Inc., Morgan County Office, 73 Central Park Plaza East, Jacksonville, IL 62650, 217-243-8215

Location of Injection Well: Morgan County, IL; 26−16N−9W; 39.80097oN and 90.07544oW

This Post- Injection Site Care and Site Closure (PISC) plan describes the activities that the FutureGen Alliance will perform to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 146.93. The FutureGen Allianc e will monitor ground water quality and track the position of the carbon dioxide plume and pre ssure front for fifty years of post-injection site care and may not cease post-injection monitoring and site care until a demonstration of non -endangerment of USDWs has been approved by the UIC Program Director pursuant to 40 CFR 146.93(b)(3). Following approval for site closure, the FutureGen Alliance will plug all monitoring wells, restore the site to its original condition, and submi t a Site Closure report and associated documentation.

Pre- and Post-Injection Pressure Differential

The information regarding pre- and post-injection pressure differentials, as required by 40 CFR 146.93(a )(2)(i) is presented below.

The maxim um injection pressure differential is 479 psi at the injection well when injection stops. The ma gnitude and area of elevated pressure gradually decreases over time after injection stops;

as further detailed in Table 1

.
Figure 1 shows the pressure differential versus time for monitoring well locations in the Area of
Re view (AoR) and at the geometric centroid of the four horizontal injection wells. Simulated

pressures at the injection “point” increase during the 20-year injection period from 1,779 psi to a maximum of 2,258 psi. The highest pressures are in the immediate vicinity of each injection well . As shown, pressures at the injection and monitoring well locations decline over time after injection ceases. Despite the modeled pressure of 2,258 psi, current permit limitations will require the pressure in the injection well not to exceed 2,252 psi.

Figu re 2 presents aqueous pressure differentials from baseline at the top of the injection zone and the extent of the carbon dioxide plume at 20 years after the start of injection (i.e., the end of injection) and 70 years after the start of injection (i.e., at site closure).Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E2 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Table 1. Pressure differential to baseline conditions at well locations near the base of the Ironton Formation for Above Confining Zone Well 1 (ACZ1) and ACZ2 and at the middle of the Mount Simon 11 layer
in the injection zone for the rest of the wells during and after.

Pressure Differential (psi)

Year SLR1 SLR2 ACZ1 ACZ2 Injection Well
Distance from Injection Well (ft) 3740 6555 1010 3740 0 Elevation (ft)

- 3371

- 3414

- 2763

- 2751

- 3390 0 (Start injection) 0 0 0 0 0

1 223 125 0 0 350

2 277 165 0 0 394

3 311 192 0 0 417

4 333 211 0 0 431

5 348 225 0 0 441

10 393 274 0 0 466

15 413 313 1 1 475 20 (Stop injection at year end) 425 338 2 2 479

21 255 235 2 2 259

22 (Approximate maximum extent of CO 2

Plume) 199 186 2 2 200

23 167 157 2 2 167

24 145 137 3 3 145

25 129 121 3 3 128

30 85 81 4 4 84

35 64 61 4 4 63

40 51 49 5 5 50

45 42 40 5 5 41

50 36 34 5 5 35

60 27 26 5 5 26

70 22 21 5 5 21

80 18 17 5 5 17

90 15 14 5 5 14

100 13 12 4 4 12

SLR1 Single

- Level in

- Reservoir #1

SLR2 Single

- Level in

- Reservoir #2

ACZ1 Above Confining Zone #1

ACZ2 Above Confining Zone #2 Injection Well Geometric centroid of four horizontal lateralsPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E3 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure 1. Simulated aqueous pressure differential versus time at monitoring well locations near the base of

the Ironton Formation for ACZ1 and ACZ2 and at the middle of the Mount Simon 11 layer in the injection zone for the rest of the we lls

.

Figure 2

. Aqueous pressure differentials from baseline condition at the top of the injection zone and CO 2

plume extents at 20 years (end of injection) and 70 years (site closure) after start of injection.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E4 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Predicted Position of the CO 2 

### Plume and Associated Pressure Front Upon Cessation of Injection and at Site Closure

The information regarding the predicted position of the carbon dioxide plume and associated pressure front at site closure, as required by 40 CFR 146.93(a)(2)(ii) is presented below.

The ar eal extent of the CO 2 

### plume increases during injection and for 2 years post-injection. As the areal extent decreases (at year 22), the plume migrates predominately upward. The computational modeling results indicate that the sequestered CO 2 

### will migrate above the Moun t Simon S andstone, into the Elmhurst as well as the lower part of the Lombard.

Figu re 3 and Figure 4 show the upward migration of the CO 2 

### plume near the injection wells at 20 and 70 y ears. These two-dimensional images demonstrate various levels of gas saturation or upward migration into the injection zone (Mount Simon Formation, Elmhurst Sandstone, and the lower part of the Lombard). The computation al model results indicate that the Model Layer “Lombard 5” is the top unit containing a fraction of injected CO 2 

### during the 100-year simulation. The top of the injection zone is set at 3,153 ft ( below MSL) at the FutureGen stratigraphic well,

corr esponding to the top of the Lombard 5 layer of the numerical model.

The computational model estimates that the CO 2 

### plume forms a cloverleaf pattern as a result of the four lateral-injection-well design. The plume grows both laterally and vertically as injection continue s. Most of the CO 2 

### resides in the Mount Simon Sandstone. A small amount of CO 2 

### enters into the Elmhurst and the lower part of the Lombard Formation. When injection ceases at 20 ye ars, the lateral growth becomes negligible but the plume continues to move slowly primarily upward. Once CO 2 

### reaches the low-permeability zone in the upper Mount Simon it begins to move laterally.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E5 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure 3. Cutaway view of CO 2 -rich phase saturation along A-A’ (Injection Wells 1 and 3) at 20 and 70 years

.

The red dashed line indicates the top of the injection zone.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E6 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure 4. Cutaway view of CO 2 -rich phase saturation along B-B’ (Injection Wells 2 and 4) at 20 and 70 years

.

The red dashed line indicates the top of the injection zone.



### Reservoir conditions are such that the CO 2 

### remains in the supercritical state throughout the domain and for the entire simulation period. The three-dimensional distribution of the CO 2 

### -rich (or separate-) phase saturation is presented for selected times (i.e., 20 and 70 years). Additionally, to better illustrate the CO 2 

### migration through time and space, a cross-sectional view of the CO 2 

### plume is presented as slices through the center of the injection wells and alongPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E7 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### the well traces. Figure 3 and Figure 4 show the CO 2 

### -rich (or separate) phase saturation for selected times for slices A-A’ and B-B’, respectively.

The maximum pressure differential corresponds to the end of the injection period (year 20). After that time, the pressure slowly dissipates, resulting in the maximum pressure differential being b elow 30 psi at 70 years, and below 20 psi at 100 years. The pressure differential distribution has been presented instead of a defined pressure front because the calculated pressure h ead in the Mt. Simon is greater than the calculated pressure head in the lowermost underg round source of drinking water (USDW), the St. Peter Sandstone, under initial conditions prior to i njection. Figure 2 presents aqueous pressure differentials from baseline at the top of the injection zone and the extent of the carbon dioxide plume at 20 years after the start of injection (i.e., the en d of injection) and 70 years after the start of injection (i.e., at site closure).

The model predicts that the areal extent of the CO 2 

### plume (defined as 99.0 percent of the separate-phase CO 2 

### mass) increases during injection and for 2 years post-injection and then begins t o decrease as buoyancy forces dominate and plume migration is predominately upward. Figure 5 shows the cumulative area of the CO 2 

### mass plume with time. The maximum plume extent, 6.46 mi 2 

### , occurs at 22 years after the start of injection (2 years after the cessation of injection).

Figure 5. Simulated plume area over time (the vertical dashed line denotes the time CO 2 injection ceases).



### The predicted extent of the CO 2 

### plume at the time of site closure, 50 years after the cessation of
CO 2 

### injection, was determined from the computational model results.

Figure 6 shows the predicted areal extent of the CO 2 

### plume (defined as 99.0 percent of the separate-phase CO 2 

### mass) at the time of site closure. The simulation predictions show that 99.0 percent of the separate-phase CO 2 

### mass would be contained within an area of 6.35 mi 2 

### at thePost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E8 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### time of site closure. This plume is only 1.7% smaller than the maximum plume area, which occurs at 22 years after the start of injection (Figure 5).

Fig ure 6. Simulated areal extent of the CO 2 plume at the time of site closure (70 years after CO 2 injection was

initiated).Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E9 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Post-Injection Monitoring Plan

FutureGen will perform post-injection monitoring, as required by 40 CFR 146.93(b), as de scribed below.

Pressure monitoring of the injection zone will occur in three monitoring wells. The Testing and Monitoring Plan (Attachment C of this permit) describes the planned monitoring activities.

Quality assurance and surveillance measures:
Data quality assurance and surveillance protocols adopted by the project are designed to facil itate compliance with the requirements specified in 40 CFR 146.90(k). Quality Assurance (QA) requirements for direct measurements within the injection zone, above the confining zone, and within the sha llow USDW aquifer that are critical to the post-injection monitoring, program (e.g ., pressure and aqueous concentration measurements) are described in the Quality Assurance and S urveillance Plan (QASP) that is presented in Appendix G of the Testing and Monitoring Plan . These measurements will be performed based on best industry practices and the QA protocols re commended by the geophysical services contractors selected to perform the work.

Location of Monitoring Wells

Monitoring well locations are described in the Testing and Monitoring Plan (Attachment C of this permit ). Their coordinates are provided in Appendix A of this plan. The objective of the moni toring program is to select and implement a suite of monitoring technologies that are both technicall y robust and provide an effective means of 1) evaluating CO 2 

### mass balance, 2) detecting any unforeseen containment loss, and 3) evaluating pressure changes in the reservoir to ensure that monitored values corroborate modeled expectations.

As part of the project’s design optimization, the monitoring well network has been configured ( Figure 7 ) to effectively monitor and account for the injected CO 2 

### and pressure changes. The de sign include s a total of nine monitoring wells :

 Two Above Confining Zone (ACZ) wells. These wells will be used to monitor immediately above the Eau Claire caprock in the Ironton Sandstone. Monitored

p arameters include: pressure, temperature, and hydrogeochemical indicators of CO 2 

### (Table 6).

 Two Single-Level in-Reservoir (SLR) wells (one of which is a reconfiguration of the

pre viously drilled stratigraphic well). These wells will be used to monitor within the inje ction zone beyond the east and west ends of the horizontal CO 2 

### -injection laterals. Monitored p arameters include: pressure, temperature, and hydrogeochemical indicators of CO 2 

### (Table 6). One additional SLR well (a tenth monitoring well) will be installed outside of the expected CO 2 

### plume to monitor pressure effects in the injection zone.

 Three Reservoir Access Tubes ( RAT ) wells. These are fully cased wells, which allow access for monitoring instrumentation in the reservoir via pulsed neutron capture (PNC) logging equipment. To avoid two-phase flow near the borehole, which can distort thePost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 10 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### CO 2 

### saturation measurements, the wells will not be perforated. Monitoring parameters include: quantifica tion of CO 2 

### saturation across the reservoir and caprock.

 One USDW well. This well will be used to monitor the lowermost USDW (the St. Peter Sandstone). Monitored parameters include: pressure, temperature, and hydrogeochemical indica tors of CO 2 

### (Table 6).

Although monitoring of the shallow surficial aquifer is not required or anticipated during the post-injection period, the network remains available for monitoring activities should the need

arise.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 11 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure 7. Map of monitoring well locations.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 12 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure 8. Surficial aquifer monitoring locations. Well FG-1 is a dedicated well drilled for the purposes of the

FutureGen project, while wells FGP-1 through FGP- 10 wells are local landowner wells.



### Summary of Planned Post-Injection Monitoring Activities

The suite of indirect geophysical monitoring methods that will be used to monitor the areal extent, evolution, and fate and transport of the injected CO 2 

### plume during PISC include: PNC logging , passive seismic monitoring, integrated surface deformation monitoring, and time-lapsegravity surveys. Table 2 summarizes the testing and monitoring activities planned for the postinjection phase; collection and recording of continuous monitoring data will occur at the frequencies described in Table 13.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 13 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Table 2. Summary of post-injection monitoring activities.

Monitoring Category Monitoring Method /Location Frequency ( Post

- Injection Phase)

Groundwater Quality and Geochemistry Monitoring Fluid sampling in surficial aquifers: 9 local landowner wells and 1 project

- drilled well None Planned

Fluid sampling in St. Peter: one lowermost USDW well Geochemistry Every 5 years

Continuous temperature and pressure monitoring

Fluid sampling in Ironton: two ACZ wells Geochemistry Every 5 years

Continuous temperature and pressure monitoring

Injection Zone Monitoring Fluid sampling in M oun t Simon: SLR monitoring wells Every 5 years

Pulsed

- n eutron c apture (PNC) logging at 3 RAT wells Every 5 years

Pressure monitoring in M oun t Simon: two SLR monitoring wells Continuous

Indirect Geophysical Monitoring Techniques Integrated deformation monitoring: five surface monitoring stations Continuous

Passive d eep m icroseismic arrays in two ACZ wells and five seismometers in shallow cased bore holes. Continuous

Note: For details and information on continuous monitoring, see Table 13.



### Groundwater Quality Monitoring

FutureG en will conduct groundwater sampling every 5 years according to the procedures describe d below.

Spec ific information concerning the sampling methods, analytical techniques, laboratories and quality assurance for sampling for the post-injection monitoring program are presented in the FutureGen QASP ; see Table A.2 for Monitoring Tasks, Methods, and Schedule.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 14 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Sampling will take place at the frequencies specified in Table 3 (for the surficial aquifers), Table
4 (for the St. Peter), and Table 5 (for the Ironton). Because near-surface environmental impacts

are not ex pected, surficial aquifer (<100 ft bgs) monitoring will only be conducted for a sufficient duration to establish baseline conditions (minimum of three sampling events) prior to start of the injec tion phase of the project.

 Surficial aquifer monitoring is not planned during the post-injection phase; however, the need for additional surficial aquifer monitoring will be continually evaluated throughout the operational phases of the project, and may be reinstituted if conditions warrant or if

re quested by

the EPA UIC Program Director.

 Target parameters for the ACZ wells include pressure, temperature, hydrogeochemical indicators of CO 2 

### , and brine composition (Table 6).

 Target parameters for the USDW and surficial aquifer wells include pressure, temperature, hydrogeochemical indicators of CO 2 

### , and brine composition (Table 6).

If a leakage response is observed in the ACZ early-detection monitoring wells (Ironton) then the decision not to institute USDW aquifer triggers will be reevaluated based on the magnitude of the observed leakage response and predictive simulations of CO 2 

### transport between the Ironton and the St. Peter Formations.

Table 3

. Sampling schedule for surficial aquifer monitoring wells.

Monitoring well name/location/map reference: Surficial aquifer monitoring wells Well depth/formation(s) sampled: Shallow glacial sediments (approx. 17 ft

– 49 ft)

Parameter/Analyte Frequency (Post

- Injection Phase)
Dissolved or separate

- phase CO 2 None Planned

Pressure None Planned

Temperature None Planned
Other parameters, including total dissolved solids, pH, specific conductivity, major cations and anions, trace metals, dissolved inorganic carbon, total organic carbon, carbon and water isotopes, and radon None Planned

Table 4

. Sampling schedule for the USDW monitoring well.

Monitoring well name/location/map reference: One USDW monitoring well (see Figure 7 ) Well depth/formation(s) sampled: St. Peter Sandstone (2,000 ft)

Parameter/Analyte Frequency (Post

- Injection Phase)
Dissolved or separate

- phase CO 2 Every 5 years

Pressure Continuous

Temperature Continuous
Other parameters, including total dissolved solids, pH, specific conductivity, major cations and anions, trace metals, dissolved inorganic carbon, total organic carbon, carbon and water isotopes, and radon Every 5 years

Note: For details and information on continuous monitoring, see Table 13.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 15 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Table 5

. Sampling schedule for ACZ monitoring wells.

Monitoring well name/location/map reference: Two ACZ monitoring wells (see Figure 

### 7 ) Well depth/formation(s) sampled: Ironton Sandstone (3,470 ft)

Parameter/Analyte Frequency (Post

- Injection Phase)

Dissolved or separate

- phase CO 2 Every 5 years

Pressure Continuous

Temperature Continuous
Other parameters, including total dissolved solids, pH, specific conductivity, major cations and anions, trace metals, dissolved inorganic carbon, total organic carbon, carbon and water isotopes, and radon Every 5 years

Note: For details and information on continuous monitoring, see Table 13.



### Note: collection and recording of continuous monitoring data will occur at the frequencies described in Table 13.

Sampling methods:

Sampling procedures are discussed below, and specific details are provided in the FutureGen QA SP Table A.2.

Dur ing all groundwater sampling, field parameters (pH, specific conductance, and temperature) will be monitored for stability and used as an indicator of adequate well purging (i.e., parameter stabilization provides indication that a representative sample has been obtained). Calibration of field probes will follow the manufacturer’s instructions using standard calibration solutions. A comprehensive list of target analytes and groundwater sample collection requirements is provided in Table 6. All analyses will be performed in accordance with the analytical requirements l isted in Table 7. Additional analytes may be included for the shallow USDW based on landow ner requests (e.g., coliform bacteria).Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 16 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)

Table 6

. Aqueous sampling requirements for target parameters.

Parameter Volume/Container Preservation Holding
Time
Major Cations: Al, Ba, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Si, 20

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), HNO 3 to pH <2 60 days

Trace Metals: Sb, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Se, Tl 20

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), HNO 3 to pH <2 60 days

Cyanide (CN

- ) 250

- mL plastic vial NaOH to pH > 12, 0.6g ascorbic acid Cool 4°C, 14 days

Mercury 250

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), HNO 3 to pH <2 28 days

Anions: Cl -

, Br -

, F -

, SO 4 2

-

, NO 3 - 125

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), Cool 4°C 45 days

Total and Bicarbonate Alkalinity (as CaCO 3 2

- ) 100

- mL HDPE Filtered (0.45 μm), Cool 4°C 14 days

Gravimetric Total Dissolved
Solids (TDS) 250

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), no preservation,
Cool 4°C 7 days

Water Density 100

- mL plastic vial No preservation

, Cool 4°C

Total Inorganic Carbon (TIC) 250

- mL plastic vial H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) 250

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm) , H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 250

- mL amber glass Unfiltered, H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) 125

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm)

, H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) Bottle set 1: 3

- 40

- mL sterile clear glass
vials

Bottle set 2: 3

- 40

- mL sterile amber glass
vials Zero headspace, Cool < 6 °C, Clear glass vials will be UV

- irradiated for
additional sterilization 7 days

Methane Bottle set 1: 3

- 40

- mL sterile clear glass
vials

Bottle set 2: 3

- 40

- mL sterile amber glass
vials Zero headspace, Cool <6 °C, Clear glass vials (bottle set 1) will be UV

irradiated for additional sterilization 7 days

Stable Carbon Isotopes 13/12 C ( δ 13 C) of DIC in Water 60

- mL plastic or glass Filtered (0.45

- μm), Cool 4°C 14 days

Radiocarbon 14 C of DIC in
Water 60

- mL plastic or glass Filtered (0.45

- μm), Cool 4°C 14 days

Hydrogen and Oxygen Isotopes

2/1 H ( δ D) and 18/16 O ( δ 18 O) of
Water 60

- mL plastic or glass Filtered (0.45

- μm), Cool 4°C 45 daysPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 17 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)

Parameter Volume/Container Preservation Holding
Time
Carbon and Hydrogen Isotopes ( 14 C, 13/12 C, 2/1 H) of Dissolved
Methane in Water 1

- L dissolved gas bottle or flask Benzalkonium chloride capsule, Cool
4°C 90 days

Compositional Analysis of Dissolved Gas in Water (including N 2 , CO 2 , O 2 , Ar, H 2 , He, CH 4 , C 2 H 6 , C 3 H 8 , iC 4 H 10 , nC 4 H 10 , iC 5 H 12 , nC 5 H 12 , and
C 6 +) 1

- L dissolved gas bottle or flask Benzalkonium chloride capsule, Cool
4°C 90 days

Radon ( 222 Rn) 1.25

- L PETE Pre

- concentrate into 20

- mL scintillation c o c k

tail. Maintain

g r ou n d w a t e r temperature prior to pre

concentration 1 day

pH Field parameter None <1 h

Specific Conductance Field parameter None <1 h

HDPE = high

- density polyethylene; PETE = polyethylene terephthalatePost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 18 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Table 7

. Analytical requirements.

Parameter Analysis Method Detection
Limit or Range Typical

Precision/ Accuracy QC Requirements



### A.1.1 Major Cations: Al, Ba,

Ca, Fe, K, Mg, 

### A.1.2 Mn, Na, Si, 

### A.1.3 ICP

- AES, EPA Method 6010B or
similar 

### A.1.4 1 to 80 μg/L (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.5 ±10%



### A.1.6 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates and matrix spikes at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.7 Trace Metals: Sb, As,

Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb

, Se, Tl



### A.1.8 ICP

- MS, EPA Method 6020 or

similar 

### A.1.9 0.1 to 2 μg/L (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.10 ±10%



### A.1.11 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates and matrix spikes at 10% level per batch
of 20 

### A.1.12 Cyanide (CN

- )



### A.1.13 SW846 9012A/B 

### A.1.14 5 μ g/L 

### A.1.15 ±10%



### A.1.16 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.17 Mercury 

### A.1.18 CVAA SW846 7470A 

### A.1.19 0.2 μ g/L 

### A.1.20 ±20%



### A.1.21 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates and matrix spikes at 10% level per batch of 20


### A.1.22 Anions: Cl -

, Br -

, F -

,

SO 4 2

-

, NO 3 - 

### A.1.23 Ion Chromatography, EPA Method 300.0A or similar 

### A.1.24 33 to 133 μg/L (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.25 ±10%



### A.1.26 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates at 10% level per
batch of 20 

### A.1.27 Total and Bicarbonate

Alkalinity (as CaCO 3 2

- )



### A.1.28 Titration, Standard Methods 2320B 

### A.1.29 1 mg/L ±10% 

### A.1.30 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.31 Gravimetric Total

Dissolved Solids (TDS



### A.1.32 Gravimetric Method Standard

Methods 2540C 

### A.1.33 10 mg/L 

### A.1.34 ±10%



### A.1.35 Balance calibration, duplicate

samples 

### A.1.36 Water Density



### A.1.37 ASTM D5057 0.01 g/mL 

### A.1.38 ±10%



### A.1.39 Balance calibration, duplicate

samples 

### A.1.40 Total Inorganic Carbon

(TIC) 

### A.1.41 SW846 9060A or equivalent



### A.1.42 Carbon analyzer, phosphoric acid

digestion of TIC 

### A.1.43 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.44 ±20%



### A.1.45 Quadruplicate analyses, daily

calibration



### A.1.46 Dissolved Inorganic

Carbon (DIC)



### A.1.47 SW846 9060A or equivalent 

### A.1.48 Carbon analyzer, phosphoric acid

digestion of DIC 

### A.1.49 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.50 ±20%



### A.1.51 Quadruplicate analyses, daily

calibration



### A.1.52 Total Organic Carbon

(TOC) 

### A.1.53 SW846 9060A or equivalent Total organic carbon is converted to carbon dioxide by chemical oxidation of the organic carbon in the sample. The carbon dioxide is measured using a non

- dispersive infrared detector. 

### A.1.54 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.55 ±20%



### A.1.56 Quadruplicate analyses, daily

calibration



### A.1.57 Dissolved Organic

Carbon (DOC)



### A.1.58 SW846 9060A or equivalent 

### A.1.59 Total organic carbon is converted to

carbon dioxide by chemical oxidation of the organic carbon in the sample. The carbon dioxide is measured using a non

- dispersive infrared detector. 

### A.1.60 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.61 ±20%



### A.1.62 Quadruplicate analyses, daily

calibration



### A.1.63 Volatile Organic

Analysis (VOA)



### A.1.64 SW846 8260B or equivalent 

### A.1.65 Purge and Trap GC/MS 

### A.1.66 0.3 to 15 μg/L 

### A.1.67 ±20%



### A.1.68 Blanks, LCS, spike, spike

duplicates per batch of 20



### A.1.69 Methane 

### A.1.70 RSK 175 Mod



### A.1.71 Headspace GC/FID 

### A.1.72 10 μg/L 

### A.1.73 ±20%



### A.1.74 Blanks, LCS, spike, spike

duplicates per batch of 20


### A.1.75 Stable Carbon Isotopes

13/12 C (1 13 C) of DIC in
Water 

### A.1.76 Gas Bench for 13/12 C 

### A.1.77 50 ppm of
DIC 

### A.1.78 ± 0.2p



### A.1.79 Duplicates and working

standards at 10%Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 19 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Parameter Analysis Method Detection
Limit or Range Typical

Precision/ Accuracy QC Requirements



### A.1.80 Radiocarbon 14 C of DIC

in Water AMS for 14 C 

### A.1.81 Range: 0 i 200 pMC 

### A.1.82 ±0.5 pMC



### A.1.83 Duplicates and working

standards at 10% 

### A.1.84 Hydrogen and Oxygen

Isotopes 2/1 H (δ ) and

18/16 O (1 18 O) of Water



### A.1.85 CRDS H 2 O Laser 

### A.1.86 Range:

- 500‰ to 200‰ vs.
VSMOW 

### A.1.87 2/1 H: ± 2.0‰



### A.1.88 18/16 O:

± 0.3‰ 

### A.1.89 Duplicates and working

standards at 10%



### A.1.90 Carbon and Hydrogen

Isotopes ( 14 C, 13/12 C,

2/1 H) of Dissolved Methane in Water



### A.1.91 Offline Prep & Dual Inlet IRMS for

13 C; AMS for 14 C 

### A.1.92 14 C Range: 0 & DupMC 

### A.1.93 14 C:

±0.5pMC



### A.1.94 13 C: ±0.2‰



### A.1.95 2/1 H: ±4.0‰



### A.1.96 Duplicates and working

standards at 10%



### A.1.97 Compositional Analysis

of Dissolved Gas in Water (including N 2 , CO 2 , O 2 , Ar, H 2 , He, CH 4 , C 2 H 6 , C 3 H 8 , iC 4 H 10 , nC 4 H 10 , iC 5 H 12 , nC 5 H 12 , and C 6 +)



### A.1.98 Modified ASTM 1945D 

### A.1.99 1 to 100 ppm (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.100 Varies by

compon

- ent Duplicates and working

standards at 10%



### A.1.101 Radon ( 222 Rn)



### A.1.102 Liquid scintillation after pre

concentration 

### A.1.103 5 mBq/L 

### A.1.104 ±10%



### A.1.105 Triplicate analyses



### A.1.106 pH 

### A.1.107 pH electrode 

### A.1.108 2 to 12 pH units 

### A.1.109  0.2 pH unit

For indication only 

### A.1.110 User calibrate, follow

manufacturer recommendations



### A.1.111 Specific Conductance



### A.1.112 Electrode 

### A.1.113 0 to 100 mS/cm 

### A.1.114  1% of

reading
For indication only 

### A.1.115 User calibrate, follow

manufacturer recommendations



### A.1.116 ICP

- AES = inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry; ICP

- MS = inductively coupled plasma mass

spectrometry; LCS = laboratory control sample; GC/MS = gas chromatography

– mass spectrometry; GC/FID = gas chromatography with flame ionization detector; AMS = accelerator mass spectrometry; CRDS = cavity ring down spectrometry; IRMS = isotope ratio mass spectrometry; LC

- MS = liquid chromatography

- mass spectrometry; ECD = electron capture detector



### Laboratory to be used/chain-of-custody procedures:

Samples will be tracked using appropriately formatted chain- of -custody forms. The sample handling and chain of custody of water, formation fluids, and environmental gas or air samples will confor

m to EPA guidance, and be conducted as discussed in Sections B.1.3 and B.1.5 thru
B.1.7 of the FutureGen QASP (Appendix G of the Testing and Monitoring Plan).Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 20 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Plan for guaranteeing access to all monitoring locations:

The land on which the ACZ and USDW wells are located will either be purchased or leased for the life of the proje ct, so access will be secured.

Access to the surficial aquifer wells will not be required over the lifetime of the project. Access to wells for baseline sampling has been on a voluntary basis by the well owner. Nine local landowners a greed to have their surficial aquifer wells sampled although sampling is not antic ipated in surficial wells during the PISC period.

Carbon Dioxide Plume and Pressure-Front Tracking

Direct Pressure Monitoring:

FutureGen will conduct direct pressure-front monitoring to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 146.93(b). Continuous monitoring of injection zone pressure and temperature (P/T) will be performed with sensors installed in wells that are completed in the injection zone. P/T monitoring in the moni toring wells will be performed using a real-time monitoring system with surface readout capabilities so that pressure gauges do not have to be removed from the well to retrieve data.

The following measures will be taken to ensure that the pressure gauges are providing accurate information on an ongoing basis:

• High -quality (high-accuracy, high-resolution) gauges with low drift characteristics will be used.

• Gauge components (gauge, cable head, cable) will be manufactured of materials designed to provide a long life expectancy for the anticipated downhole conditions.

• Upon acquisition, a calibration certificate will be obtained for every pressure gauge. The calibration certificate will provide the manufacturer’s specifications for range, accuracy (% full scale), resolution (% full scale), drift (< psi per year), and calibration results for

e ach parameter. The calibration certificate will also provide the date that the gauge was calibrated and the methods and standards used.

• Gauges will be installed above any packers so they can be removed if necessary for recalibration by removing the tubing string. Redundant gauges may be run on the same cable to provide confirmation of downhole pressure and temperature. Pressure gauges will be calibrated on an annual basis with current annual calibration certificates provided with test results to the EPA. In lieu of removing the injection tubing, the calibration of downhole pressure gauges will demonstrate accuracy by using a second pressure gauge, with current certified calibration, that will be lowered into the well to the same depth as the permanent downhole gauge. Calibration curves, based on annual calibration checks (using the second calibrated pressure gauge) developed for the downhole gauge, can be used for the purpose of the fall-off test. If used, these calibration curves (showing all historic pressure deviations) will accompany the fall-off test data submitted to the EPA.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 21 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### • Upon installation, all gauges will be tested to verify they are functioning (reading/transmitting) correctly.

• Gauges will be pulled and recalibrated whenever a workover occurs that involves removal of tubing. A new calibration certificate will be obtained whenever a gauge is recalibrated.
Direct pressure monitoring in the injection zone will take place as indicated in Table 8

. Collection and recording of continuous monitoring data will occur at the frequencies described in Table 13.

Ta ble 8

. Monitoring schedule for direct pressure-front tracking.

Well Location/Map Reference Depth(s)/Formation(s) Frequency (Post

- Injection Phase)

Two SLR monitoring wells (SLR Wells 1 and 2 , see Figure 7 ) M oun t Simon/4,150 ft. Continuous

Note: For details and information on continuous monitoring, see Table 13.



### Direct Geochemical Plume Monitoring:

FutureGen will conduct direct CO 2 

### plume monitoring to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 146.93(b). Target parameters include pressure, temperature, and hydrogeochemical indicators of
CO 2 

### (Ta ble 6) and brine composition.

In addition to direct plume sampling and characterization, indirect montoring of the CO 2 

### pl um e will be conducted by continuing the periodic PNC logging across the injection zone and primary confining zone. PNC logging is a proven method for quantifying CO 2 

### saturation around a borehole. The PNC logging will be conducted using the three RAT wells. The RAT wells will be logged every 5 years during the post-injection period. Information collected will be compared with pri or logs to determine trends.

Direct fluid sampling in the injection zone will take place as indicated inPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 22 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Table 9 (c ollection and recording of continuous monitoring data will occur at the frequencies de scribed in Table 13).Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 23 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)

Table 9

. Monitoring schedule for direct geochemical plume monitoring.

Monitoring well name/location/map reference: Two SLR monitoring wells (see Figure 7 )
W ell depth/formation(s) sampled: M oun t Simon Sandstone (4,150 ft)

Parameter/Analyte Frequency (Post

- Injection Phase)
Dissolved or separate

- phase CO 2 Every 5 years

Pressure Continuous

Temperature Continuous
Other parameters, including major cations and anions, selected metals, and general water

- quality parameters (pH, alkalinity, total dissolved solids, specific gravity) E very 5 years

Note: For details and information on continuous monitoring, see Table 13.



### Sampling methods:

The FutureGen QASP and Testing and Monitoring Plan provide supplemental details about the sampling and analysis protocols for the direct fluid sampling that are outlined below.

F luid samples will be collected from the monitoring wells completed in the injection zone as detailed in Table 9 a

bove. Fluid samples will be collected using an appropriate method to preserve the fluid sample at injection zone temperature and pressure conditions. Examples of appropriate methods include using a bomb-type sampler (e.g., Kuster sampler) after pumped orswabbed purging of the sampling interval, using a Westbay sampler, or using a pressurized Utube sampler (Freifeld et al. 2005).

Fluid samples will be analyzed for parameters that are indicators of CO 2 

### dissolution, including major cations and anions, selected metals, and general water-quality parameters (pH, alkalinity, TDS, specific gravity). Analysis of carbon and oxygen isotopes in injection zone fluids and the injec tion stream ( 13/12 

### C, 18/16 

### O) provides another potential supplemental measure of CO 2 

### migration. Where stable isotopes are included as an analyte, data quality and detectability will be reviewe d throughout the active injection phase, and upon the UIC Program Director’s approval, will be discontinued if these analyses provide limited benefit. Sampling and analytical requirements for target parameters are listed in Table 10 and Table 11 , respectively.

Laboratory to be used/chain-of-custody procedures:

See FutureGen QASP Sections B.4.3 thru B.4.7.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 24 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)

Table 10

. Aqueous sampling requirements for target parameters.

Parameter Volume/Container Preservation Holding
Time
Major Cations: Al, Ba, Ca, Fe, K, Mg, Mn, Na, Si, 20

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), HNO 3 to pH <2 60 days

Trace Metals: Sb, As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Se, Tl 20

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), HNO 3 to pH <2 60 days

Cyanide (CN

- ) 250

- mL plastic vial NaOH to pH > 12, 0.6g ascorbic acid Cool 4°C, 14 days

Mercury 250

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), HNO 3 to pH <2 28 days

Anions: Cl -

, Br -

, F -

, SO 4 2

-

, NO 3 - 125

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), Cool 4°C 45 days

Total and Bicarbonate Alkalinity (as CaCO 3 2

- ) 100

- mL HDPE Filtered (0.45 μm), Cool 4°C 14 days

Gravimetric Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) 250

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm), no preservation, Cool 4°C 7 days

Water Density 100

- mL plastic vial No preservation

, Cool 4°C

Total Inorganic Carbon (TIC) 250

- mL plastic vial H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC) 250

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm) , H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Total Organic Carbon (TOC) 250

- mL amber glass Unfiltered, H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) 125

- mL plastic vial Filtered (0.45 μm)

, H 2 SO 4 to pH <2, Cool 4°C 28 days

Volatile Organic Analysis (VOA) Bottle set 1: 3

- 40

- mL sterile clear glass
vials

Bottle set 2: 3

- 40

- mL sterile amber glass
vials Zero headspace, Cool <6 °C, Clear glass vials will be UV

- irradiated for
additional sterilization 7 days

Methane Bottle set 1: 3

- 40

- mL sterile clear glass
vials

Bottle set 2: 3

- 40

- mL sterile amber glass
vials Zero headspace, Cool <6 °C, Clear glass vials (bottle set 1) will be UV

irradiated for additional sterilization 7 days

Stable Carbon Isotopes 13/12 C ( δ 13 C) of DIC in Water 60

- mL plastic or glass Filtered (0.45

- μm), Cool 4°C 14 days

Radiocarbon 14 C of DIC in
Water 60

- mL plastic or glass Filtered (0.45

- μm), Cool 4°C 14 days

Hydrogen and Oxygen Isotopes 2/1 H ( δ D) and 60

- mL plastic or glass Filtered (0.45

- μm), Cool 4°C 45 daysPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 25 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)

Parameter Volume/Container Preservation Holding
Time

18/16 O ( δ 18 O) of Water

Carbon and Hydrogen Isotopes ( 14 C, 13/12 C, 2/1 H) of
Dissolved Methane in Water 1

- L dissolved gas bottle or flask Benzalkonium chloride capsule, Cool
4°C 90 days

Compositional Analysis of Dissolved Gas in Water (including N 2 , CO 2 , O 2 , Ar,
H 2 , He, CH 4 , C 2 H 6 , C 3 H 8 , iC 4 H 10 , nC 4 H 10 , iC 5 H 12 , nC 5 H 12 , and C 6 +) 1

- L dissolved gas bottle or flask Benzalkonium chloride capsule, Cool
4°C 90 days

Radon ( 222 Rn) 1.25

- L PETE Pre

- concentrate into 20

- mL scintillation c o c k

tail. Maintain

g r ou n d w a t e r temperature prior to pre

concentration 1 day

pH Field parameter None <1 h

Specific Conductance Field parameter None <1 h

HDPE = high

- density polyethylene; PETE = polyethylene terephthalatePost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 26 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Table 11

. Analytical requirements.

Parameter Analysis Method Detection
Limit or Range Typical

Precision/ Accuracy QC Requirements



### A.1.117 Major Cations: Al, Ba,

Ca, Fe, K, Mg, 

### A.1.118 Mn, Na, Si, 

### A.1.119 ICP

- AES, EPA Method 6010B or
similar 

### A.1.120 1 to 80 μg/L (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.121 ±10%



### A.1.122 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates and matrix spikes at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.123 Trace Metals: Sb, As,

Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb

, Se, Tl



### A.1.124 ICP

- MS, EPA Method 6020 or

similar 

### A.1.125 0.1 to 2 μg/L (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.126 ±10%



### A.1.127 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates and matrix spikes at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.128 Cyanide (CN

- )



### A.1.129 SW846 9012A/B 

### A.1.130 5 μ g/L 

### A.1.131 ±10%



### A.1.132 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.133 Mercury 

### A.1.134 CVAA SW846 7470A 

### A.1.135 0.2 μ g/L 

### A.1.136 ±20%



### A.1.137 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates and matrix spikes at 10% level per batch
of 20


### A.1.138 Anions: Cl -

, Br -

, F -

,

SO 4 2

-

, NO 3 - 

### A.1.139 Ion Chromatography, EPA Method
300.0A or similar 

### A.1.140 33 to 133 μg/L (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.141 ±10%



### A.1.142 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.143 Total and Bicarbonate

Alkalinity (as CaCO 3 2

- )



### A.1.144 Titration, Standard Methods 2320B 

### A.1.145 1 mg/L ±10% 

### A.1.146 Daily calibration; blanks, LCS,

and duplicates at 10% level per batch of 20 

### A.1.147 Gravimetric Total

Dissolved Solids (TDS



### A.1.148 Gravimetric Method Standard

Methods 2540C 

### A.1.149 10 mg/L 

### A.1.150 ±10%



### A.1.151 Balance calibration, duplicate

samples 

### A.1.152 Water Density



### A.1.153 ASTM D5057 0.01 g/mL 

### A.1.154 ±10%



### A.1.155 Balance calibration, duplicate

samples 

### A.1.156 Total Inorganic Carbon

(TIC) 

### A.1.157 SW846 9060A or equivalent



### A.1.158 Carbon analyzer, phosphoric acid

digestion of TIC 

### A.1.159 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.160 ±20%



### A.1.161 Quadruplicate analyses, daily

calibration



### A.1.162 Dissolved Inorganic

Carbon (DIC)



### A.1.163 SW846 9060A or equivalent 

### A.1.164 Carbon analyzer, phosphoric acid

digestion of DIC 

### A.1.165 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.166 ±20%



### A.1.167 Quadruplicate analyses, daily

calibration



### A.1.168 Total Organic Carbon

(TOC) 

### A.1.169 SW846 9060A or equivalent Total organic carbon is converted to carbon dioxide by chemical oxidation of the organic carbon in the sample. The carbon dioxide is measured using a non

- dispersive infrared detector. 

### A.1.170 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.171 ±20%



### A.1.172 Quadr

uplicate analyses, daily
calibration



### A.1.173 Dissolved Organic

Carbon (DOC)



### A.1.174 SW846 9060A or equivalent 

### A.1.175 Total organic carbon is converted to

carbon dioxide by chemical oxidation of the organic carbon in the sample. The carbon dioxide is measured using a non

- dispersive infrared detector. 

### A.1.176 0.2 mg/L 

### A.1.177 ±20%



### A.1.178 Quadruplicate analyses, daily

calibration



### A.1.179 Volatile Organic

Analysis (VOA)



### A.1.180 SW846 8260B or equivalent 

### A.1.181 Purge and Trap GC/MS 

### A.1.182 0.3 to 15 μg/L 

### A.1.183 ±20%



### A.1.184 Blanks, LCS, spike, spike

duplicates per batch of 20



### A.1.185 Methane 

### A.1.186 RSK 175 Mod



### A.1.187 Headspace GC/FID 

### A.1.188 10 μg/L 

### A.1.189 ±20%



### A.1.190 Blanks, LCS, spike, spike

duplicates per batch of 20


### A.1.191 Stable Carbon Isotopes

13/12 C (1 13 C) of DIC in
Water 

### A.1.192 Gas Bench for 13/12 C 

### A.1.193 50 ppm of
DIC 

### A.1.194 ± 0.2p



### A.1.195 Duplicates and working

standards at 10%Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 27 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Parameter Analysis Method Detection
Limit or Range Typical

Precision/ Accuracy QC Requirements



### A.1.196 Radiocarbon 14 C of DIC

in Water AMS for 14 C 

### A.1.197 Range: 0 i 200 pMC 

### A.1.198 ±0.5 pMC



### A.1.199 Duplicates and working

standards at 10% 

### A.1.200 Hydrogen and Oxygen

Isotopes 2/1 H (δ ) and

18/16 O (1 18 O) of Water



### A.1.201 CRDS H 2 O Laser 

### A.1.202 Range:

- 500‰ to 200‰ vs.
VSMOW 

### A.1.203 2/1 H: ± 2.0‰



### A.1.204 18/16 O:

± 0.3‰ 

### A.1.205 Duplicates and working

standards at 10%



### A.1.206 Carbon and Hydrogen

Isotopes ( 14 C, 13/12 C,

2/1 H) of Dissolved Methane in Water



### A.1.207 Offline Prep & Dual Inlet IRMS for

13 C; AMS for 14 C 

### A.1.208 14 C Range: 0 & DupMC 

### A.1.209 14 C:

±0.5pMC



### A.1.210 13 C: ±0.2‰



### A.1.211 2/1 H: ±4.0‰



### A.1.212 Duplicates and working

standards at 10%



### A.1.213 Compositional Analysis

of Dissolved Gas in Water (including N 2 , CO 2 , O 2 , Ar, H 2 , He, CH 4 , C 2 H 6 , C 3 H 8 , iC 4 H 10 , nC 4 H 10 , iC 5 H 12 , nC 5 H 12 , and C 6 +)



### A.1.214 Modified ASTM 1945D 

### A.1.215 1 to 100 ppm (analyte dependent) 

### A.1.216 Varies by

compon

- ent Duplicates and working

standards at 10%



### A.1.217 Radon ( 222 Rn)



### A.1.218 Liquid scintillation after pre

concentration 

### A.1.219 5 mBq/L 

### A.1.220 ±10%



### A.1.221 Triplicate analyses



### A.1.222 pH 

### A.1.223 pH electrode 

### A.1.224 2 to 12 pH units 

### A.1.225  0.2 pH unit

For indication only 

### A.1.226 User calibrate, follow

manufacturer recommendations



### A.1.227 Specific Conductance



### A.1.228 Electrode 

### A.1.229 0 to 100 mS/cm 

### A.1.230  1% of

reading
For indication only 

### A.1.231 User calibrate, follow

manufacturer
recommendations



### A.1.232 ICP

- AES = inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry; ICP

- MS = inductively coupled plasma mass

spectrometry; LCS = laboratory control sample; GC/MS = gas chromatography

– mass spectrometry; GC/FID = gas chromatography with flame ionization detector; AMS = accelerator mass spectrometry; CRDS = cavity ring down spectrometry; IRMS = isotope ratio mass spectrometry; LC

- MS = liquid chromatography

- mass spectro metry; ECD = electron capture detectorPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 28 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Indirect Carbon Dioxide Plume and Pressure-Front Tracking

FutureGen will track the CO 2 

### plume and pressure front to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 146.93(b) using integrated deformation monitoring and passive seismic monitoring.

The fre quency of indirect plume and pressure-front monitoring activities during the postinjection phase, is given in Table 12 (c o llection and recording of continuous monitoring data will occur at the frequencies described in Table 13). The coordinates of the monitoring wells/stations

are provided in Appendix C of this Plan.

Table 12

. Monitoring schedule for indirect plume and pressure-front monitoring.

Monitoring Technique Location Frequency (Post

- Injection Phase)

Integrated deformation monitoring 5 locations (see Figure 7 ) Continuous

Passive seismic monitoring (microseismicity) Surface measurements (see Figure 7 ) plus downhole sensor arrays at ACZ Wells 1 and 2 Continuous



### Integrated deformation monitoring

Integrated deformation monitoring integrates ground data from permanent Global Positioning System ( GPS) stations, and tiltmeters, supplemented with annual Differential GPS (DGPS)

surveys, a nd larger-scale Differential Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (DInSAR) surveys to detect and map temporal ground-surface deformation. These data reflect the dynamic geomechanical behavior of the subsurface in response to CO 2 

### injection. These measurements will provide useful information about the evolution and symmetry of the pressure front. These results will be compared with model predictions throughout the operational phase of the project and significant deviation in observed response would result in further action, including a detailed evaluation of the observed response, calibration/refinement of the numerical model, and possible modification to the monitoring approach and/or storage site operations. Integrated deformation monitoring will take place at the locations shown in Figure 7.

Passive seismic monitoring (microseismicity)

The objective of the microseismic monitoring network ( Figure 7 ; five stations and downhole

arr ays in the two ACZ wells) is to accurately determine the locations, magnitudes, and focal mech anisms of any potential injection-induced seismic events with the primary goals of 1) addressing public and stakeholder concerns related to induced seismicity, 2) estimating the spatial extent of the pressure front from the distribution of any potential se ismic events, and 3) identifying features that may indicate areas of caprock failure and possible containment loss. The Emergency and Remedial Response Plan (Attachment F to this permit) provides additional information about seismic monitoring).Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 29 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)

Table 13. Sampling and Recording Frequencies for Continuous Monitoring.

Well Condition Minimum sampling frequency: once every Minimum recording frequency: once every

For operating injection wells that are required to monitor continuously: 5 seconds 5 minutes 1

For injection wells that are shut

- in: 4 hours 4 hours

For monitoring wells (USDW, ACZ, SLR): 30 minutes 2 hours

1 This can be an average of the sampled readings over the previous 5

- minute recording interval, or the maximum (or minimum, as appropriate) value identified over that recording interval

Notes: Sampling frequency refers to how often the monitoring device obtains data from the well for a particular parameter. For example, a recording device might sample a pressure transducer monitoring injection pressure once every two seconds and save this value in memory.

Recording frequency refers to how often the samp led information gets recorded to digital format (such as a computer hard drive). Following the same example above, the data from the injection pressure transducer might be recorded to a hard drive once every minute.



### Proposed Schedule for Submitting Post-Injection Monitoring Results

During the PISC period, monitoring reports will be prepared and submitted to the EPA Region 5
UIC office annually. The reports will summarize methods and results of the groundwater-quality monitoring

, CO 2 

### storage zone pressure tracking, and indirect geophysical monitoring for CO 2 

### plume tracking. See Table 14.

Table 14

. Post-injection phase reporting schedule.

Planned Testing/Monitoring Reporting Schedule

Groundwater Quality Monitoring Data Annual

Carbon Dioxide Plume and Pressure

- Front Tracking Data Annual

Direct Pressure Monitoring Data Annual

Indirect Carbon Dioxide Plume and Pressure

Front Tracking Data Annual



### The PISC and Site Closure Plan will be reviewed every 5 years during the PISC period (e.g.,

concurr ent with or as a result of 5-year reevaluations of the AoR). Results of the plan review willPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 30 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### be included in the PISC monitoring reports. Monitoring and operational results will be reviewed for adequacy in relation to the objectives of PISC monitoring. The monitoring locations, methods, and sche dule will be analyzed in relation to the size of the CO 2 

### storage zone, pressure front, and protection of USDWs. In case of changes to the PISC plan, a modified plan will be submitted to the EPA R egion 5 UIC Branch Office for not less than 30 days prior to the planned intiation of the c hanges.

Alternative Post-Injection Site Care Time Frame

FutureGen is not requesting an alternative PISC time frame. As indicated in Section O(6)(b)(v) of this permit, the permittee shall continue to conduct post-injection site monitoring for at least 50 years or for the duration of any alternative timeframe approved pursuant to 40 CFR 146.93(c).

Non-Endangerment Demonstration Criteria

Prior to approval of the end of the PISC period, FutureGen will submit a d emonst ra tion of nonen d ang er ment of USDWs to the UIC Prog ra m Dir ec tor (40 CFR 146.93(b )( 3)).

F utureGen will issue a report to the UIC Progra m Dir ec to r. This report will make a d emonst ra tion of USDW non-endang er ment based on the evaluation of the site monitoring d a ta used in conjunction with the project’s computational model. The report will in clude
inf ormation detailing how the non-endang er m ent demonstration evaluation uses site- sp ec ific conditions to confir

m and demonst ra te non -end an g er ment. The re p ort will include a ll re lev ant monitoring data and int er p re tations upon which the non -endangerment demonst ra tion is b ased and any other information n ece ssa ry for the UIC Prog ra m Dir ec tor to re pli ca te the an alysi s. The report will include the sections discussed below.

Su mm ary of Existing Monitoring Data

A summary of all p re vious monitoring da ta at the site, including da ta collected du ring the inj ec tion and PISC phases of the proj ec t, will be submitted to help demonst ra te non

end ang er ment. Da ta sub mitt als will be in a format acceptable to the UIC Program Director (40 CFR 146.91(e)), and will include a narrative explan ation of monitoring ac tivities, including the d ate s of all monitoring events, change s to the monitoring pr og ra m over tim e, and an explanation of all moni to ring in fr a st ru c tu re th at h a s existed at the site.

Co m pa rison of Monito ring Data and Mode l Pre di ct ion s and M od e l Do cumentation

The re sults of computati on al modeling used for AoR de lin ea tion will be comp ar e d to monitoring data coll ec t e d during the operational and the PISC period. Monitoring da ta will also be co mpared with baseline da ta collected du ring site ch ar act er ization, per 40 CFR 146.82(a)(6) and 146.87(d)(3). The data used to update the computational model and to monitor the site will include both dire ct (e.g., temporal measurements of pressure, temperature, groundwater quality, and injection zone fluid composition) and indirect geophysical methods (e.g., passive seismic and integrated deformation monitoring, PNC logging). Data generated during the PISCPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 31 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### period will be used to show that the computational model accurately represents the storage site and ca n be used as a proxy to determine the plume’s properties and size. FutureGen will demonstra te this degree of accuracy by comparing the monitoring data obtained during the
PI SC period against the model ’s p re dicted properties (i.e., plume location, rate of movement, and p re ssu re decay). Statistical methods will be employed to correlate the data and confirm the model’s ability to accurately represent the storage site. The validation of the computationalmodel with the large volume of available data will be a significant element to support the nonend angerment demonst ra tion. Further, the validation of the complete model over the areas, and at the points, where direct data collection has taken place will ensure confidence in the model for those areas where surface infrastructure preclude geophysical data collection and where there are no direct observation wells.

Evaluation of Carbon Dioxide Plume

FutureGe n will use a combination of monitoring data, logs, geophysical surveys, and seismic methods to locate and track the movement of the CO 2 

### plume. The data produced by these activities will be compared against the modeled predictions (see Figure 6) using statistical methods to validate the model’s ability to accurately represent the storage site. Regarding the

sep arate-phase carbon dioxide plume, the PISC monitoring data will show the stabilization of the CO 2 

### plume as the reservoir pressure returns to its near pre-injection state. For the separatephase c arbon dioxide plume, the risk to USDWs will decrease when the extent of pure-phase carbon dioxide ceases to grow either laterally or vertically. The stabilization of the plume combi ned with the lack of local penetrations of the confining formation will be significant factor s in FutureGen’s demonstration of non-endangerment. Furthermore, FutureGen’s monitoring we lls screened above the confining layer may be used to determine aqueous-phase concentrations of carbon dioxide and mobilized constituents in order to assess USDW endan germent. If a demonstration can be made, in conjunction with monitoring data, that a vast majority of the carbon dioxide has been immobilized via trapping mechanisms, this is strong evidence that the risk to USDWs posed by the carbon dioxide plume has decreased. Modeling may also be used to estimate future plume migration. Modeling results, including sensitivity analyses, may be used to demonstrate that plume migration rates are negligible based on available site characterization, monitoring, and operational data.

Evaluation of Mobilize d Fluid s

In addition to car

bon di ox id e, mobilized fluids may pose an ongoing risk to USDWs. These
in clude na tive fluids tha t ar e high in TD S and th er ef o re may imp a ir a US DW

, and fluids containing mobilized drinking wa ter conta min an t s (e .g., ar senic, mercu ry, hyd rogen sulf id e)

. The ge o ch e mi cal da ta collected fr om monitoring wells will be used to demonstrate that no mobili zed fluids have moved above the confining formation and, therefore after the PISC period , would not po se a risk to USDWs. Of particular importance are any monitoring wells that are screened above the primary confining zone, within any USDWs, and in the vicinity of any known leakage pathways. Monitoring data indicating steady or decreasing trends of potential drinking water contaminants below actionable levels (e.g., secondary and maximumcontaminant levels) will be used for this demonstration. In order to demonstrate nonendang erment, FutureGen will compare the operational and PISC period samples of thePost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 32 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### lowermost USDW against the pre-injection baseline samples. This comparison will show that no significant changes have occurred in the fluid properties of the overlying formations. This will demonstrate that no mobilized formation fluids have moved through the confining formation. This validation of confining zone integrity will demonstrate that the injectate and/or mobilized fluids would not represent an endangerment to any USDWs.

Evaluation of Re s er voir Pre ssu r e

FutureGen will also demonstrate non-endangerment to USDWs by showing that during the PISC period, the pressure within the Mount Simon rapidly decreases to its near pre-injection static rese rvoir pressure. Because the incr ea sed pre ssu re is the pr im ary d r iv ing fo rc e for fluid

mov ement that may endanger a USDW, the decay in the p re ssu re d i ffe rentials will provide strong justification that the injectate no longer poses a risk to any USDWs.

FutureGen will monitor the downhole reservoir pressure at various locations and intervals using

a co mbination of surface and downhole pressure gauges. The measured pressure at a specific depth interval will be compared against the pressure predicted by the computational model (see Figu res 1 and 2). Agreement between the actual and the predicted values will validate the

acc uracy of the model and further demonstrate non-endangerment.

Evaluation of Po te ntial Conduits for Fluid Moveme nt

Othe r than the pr oject and monitoring wells, other distant potential conduits for flu id movement,

or leakage pa th ways within the AoR are adequately constructed and/or plugged. Based on this information, the potential for fluid movement through artificial penetrations of the confining formation does not present a risk of endangerment to any USDWs.

Evaluation of Passive Seismic Data

Seism ic monitoring will be used to further demonstrate confining formation integrity.
FutureG en will provide seismic monitoring data showing that no seismic events have occurred that would indica te fracturing or fault activation near or through the confining formation. This valida tion of confining zone integrity will provide further support to demonstrate that the CO 2 

### plume is no longer an endangerment to any USDWs, by indicating that the response to the imposed fluid pressures due to injection are confined to the vicinity of the injection zone and below.

Site Closure Plan

FutureGen will conduct site closure activities to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 146.93(e). Sit e closure will occur at the end of the PISC period. Site closure activities will include decomm issioning surface equipment, plugging monitoring wells, restoring the site, and preparing and submitting site closure reports.

The EPA Region 5 UIC Branch Office will be notified at least 120 days before site closure. In addition, state and local agencies including the Illinois State Geological Survey and IllinoisPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 33 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Department of Natural Resources, as well as City of Jacksonville and Morgan County agencies will be notified prior to the scheduled site closure. At this time, there are no federally recognized Native American Tribes located within the AoR or the State of Illinois. If a federally recognized Native American Tribe exists in the AoR or the State of Illinois at the time of site closure, it will be notified of site closure at that time.

A revised sit e closure plan will be submitted to the EPA Region 5 UIC Branch Office and state and local (a nd tribal) governmental agencies, if any changes have been made to the original site closure plan. After site closure is authorized, site closure field activities will be completed.

Plan ned Remedial/Site Restoration Activities

At the end of the PISC phase, FutureGen will ensure the site is reclaimed and returned to predeve lopment condition to meet the requirements of 40 CFR 146.93(e).

Surfa ce equipment decommissioning will occur in two phases: the first phase will occur after the active injection phase, and the second phase will occur at the end of PISC phase. The surface facil ities at the storage site will include the Site Control Building and the APS (Annulus Pressurization System) Building.

At the end of the active injection period, plume monitoring will continue, but there will be no further need for the pumping and control equipment. The Site Control Building will be demolished. All features will be removed except the APS Building, a 12- ft -wide a ccess road with five parking spaces, a concrete sidewalk from the parking lot to the building, underground electrical and telephone services, and a chain-link fence surrounding the building. The common wall between the APS Building and the Site Control Building will be converted to an exterior wall. The injection wells will be plugged and capped below grade (see the Injection Well Plugging Plan in Attachment D of this permit). The gravel pad will be removed. The APS Building at the storage site will be repurposed to act as the collection node for data from the plume monitoring equipment. The building will contain equipment to receive real-time data from the monitoring wells and other monitoring stations and send the data via an internet connection to be analyzed offsite during the 50-year post-injection monitoring period.

All surface facilities will be removed at the end of the PISC phase. These facilities will include the APS B uilding, the access road with parking spaces, all sidewalks, underground electrical and telephone se rvices, and fencing at the injection well sites. The site will be reclaimed and returned to predevelopment condition.

Soil will be backfilled around the monitoring and geophysical wells to bring the area around the wells back to pre-well-installation grade. Any remaining surface facilities associated with the monitoring well will be reclaimed and the area will be returned to predevelopment condition. All gravel pads, access roads, and surface facilities will be removed, and the land will be reclaimed for ag ricultural or other beneficial pre-construction uses.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 34 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Plugging the Monitoring Wells

Upon conclusion of the post-injection site care period (~50 years), all monitoring wells will be plugged and capped below grade in accordance with the approved monitoring well Plugging and Abandonment Plans (see Appendix E of this Plan). All deep monitoring wells at the site will be plugg ed to pr event any upward migration of the CO 2 

### or formation fluids in to USDWs. Each of the deep monitoring wells will be plugged and abandoned using best practices to prevent communica tion of fluids between the injection zone and USDWs. The deep monitoring wells in the injection interval have a direct connection between the injection formation and ground surface. The well-plugging program is designed to prevent communication between the injection zone and the USDWs.

Before the wells are plugged, the internal and external integrity of the wells will be confirmed by conducting cement-bond, temperature, and noise logs on each of the wells. In addition, a

pressure fall-off test will be performed above the perforated intervals (where present) to confirm well integrity. The results of the logging and testing will be reviewed and approved by appropriate regulatory agencies prior to plugging the wells.

The wells with perforations (the SLR monitoring wells, the ACZ monitoring wells, and lowermost USDW monitoring well) will be plugged using a CO 2 

### -resistant cement retainer method to cement the perforated intervals and a balanced plug method to cement the well above the perforated zones and the cement retainer. The RAT monitoring wells will not have perfor ations; therefore, only the balanced plug method will be used to plug these wells. Once the interior of the casing has been properly plugged with cement, the casing will be cut off below ground and capped. Regulations at the time of the plugging and abandonment will dictate the specifications regarding the depth at which the casing is cut and the method used to cap the well. The cap will be inscribed with the well identification number and the date of plug and abandonment.

Plugging the Geophysical Wells

The FutureGen microseismic and deformation monitoring designs include five geophysica l monitoring stations . Two types of well completions will be constructed at each of the five geophysical monitoring stations: both well types will be completed as sealed access tubes designed to support downhole installation of either microseismic or tiltmeter instrumention in a subsurface moisture free environment. Well construction and plugging schematics showing the

expose d formation intervals, casing diameters, casing depths, depths to USDWs, and the placement of all plugs are presented for each well type in Figure 9.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 35 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)

Figure 9. Diagram of Microseismic and Tiltmeter Wells After Plugging and Abandonment.



### Upon conclusion of the post-injection site care period, all geophysical wells will be plugged and capped below grade in accordance with the approved monitoring well Plugging and Abandonment Plans ( see Appendix E of this plan). All downhole instrumentation will be

re moved and each microseismic well casing and tiltmeter well casing will be plugged with

cement to ensur e that the well does not provide a conduit to the shallow USDW zone or ground surface. The procedures for plugging and abandoning both types of wells are very similar.
Howeve r, cement volumes will differ depending upon the total depth of the well.

For both well-completion designs, class A cement will be used to plug the well casing. The geoph ysical wells will not have perforations; therefore, the balanced plug method will be used to plug these wells. Once the interior of the casing has been properly plugged with cement, the casing will be cut off below ground and capped. Regulations at the time of the plugging and abandonment will dictate the specifications regarding the depth at which the casing is cut and the method used to cap the well. The cap will be inscribed with the well identification number and the date of plu g and abandonment.

The methods and materials described in this plan are based upon current understanding of the geology at the site and current well designs. If necessary, the plans will be updated to reflect the latest well designs. These new designs, materials, and methods will be described in the Notice of Intent to Plug submitted at least 60 days prior to the plugging of the wells.

After the completion of the plugging activities, a plugging report will be submitted to the UIC Program Director describing the methods used and tests performed on the well during plugging. This report wil l be submitted to the UIC Program Director within 60 days of completing the plugging activities.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 36 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### Site Closure Reporting

A site closure report will be submitted to the EPA Region 5 UIC Branch Office and the previously notified state and local regulatory agencies within 90 days of site closure. The site closure report will include the following information:

• Documentation of appropriate well plugging, including a survey plat of the injection well location;

• Documentation of the well-plugging report to Illinois and local agencies that have authority over drilling activities at the facility site; and

• Records reflecting the nature, composition, and volume of the CO 2 

### injected in UIC wells.

In association with site closure, a record of notation on the facility property deed will be added to provide any potential purchaser of the property with the following information:

• Notification that the subsurface was used for CO 2 

### storage ;

• The name of the Illinois and local agencies and the EPA Region 5 Branch Office to which the survey plat was submitted; and

• The volume of fluid injected, the injection zone, and the period over which injection occurred.

PISC and site closure records will be retained for 10 years after site closure. At the conclusion of the 10-year period, these records will be delivered to the EPA Region 5 UIC Branch Office for further storage.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 37 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)



### APPENDIX A: Deep Monitoring Well Locations

Well ID Well Type Latitude (WGS84) Longitude

(WGS84)

ACZ1 Above Confining Zone 1 39.80034315

- 90.07829648

ACZ2 Above Confining Zone 2 39.80029543

- 90.08801028

USDW1 Underground Source of Drinking Water 39.80048042

- 90.0782963

SLR1 Single

- Level in

- Reservoir 1 39.8004327

- 90.08801013

SLR2 Single

- Level in

- Reservoir 2 39.80680878

- 90.05298062

RAT1 Reservoir Access Tube 1 39.80035565

- 90.08627478

RAT2 Reservoir Access Tube 2 39.78696855

- 90.06902677

RAT3 Reservoir Access Tube 3 39.79229199

- 90.08901656Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 38 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)



### APPENDIX B : Surficial Aquifer Monitoring Well Locations

Well ID Well Type Latitude Longitude

FG

- 1 FutureGen Shallow Monitoring Well 39.80675

- 90.05283

FGP

- 1 Private Well 39.79888

- 90.0736

FGP

- 2 Private Well 39.78554

- 90.0639

FGP

- 3 Private Well 39.79497

- 90.0746

FGP

- 4 Private Well 39.79579

- 90.0747

FGP

- 5 Private Well 39.81655

- 90.0622

FGP

- 6 Private Well 39.81086

- 90.057560

FGP

- 7 Private Well 39.81444

- 90.065241

FGP

- 9 Private Well 39.80829

- 90.0377

FGP

- 10 Private Well 39.81398

- 90.0427Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 39 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### APPENDIX C: Microseismic Monitoring and Integrated Deformation Station Locations

Well ID/Station ID Well/Station Type Latitude (WGS84) Longitude

(WGS84)

MS1  Microseismic monitoring Station 1(shallow borehole)

 Integrated deformation monitoring station 39.8110768

- 90.09797015

MS2  Microseismic monitoring Station 2 (shallow borehole)

 Integrated deformation monitoring station 39.78547402

- 90.05028403

MS3  Microseismic monitoring Station 3 (shallow borehole)

 Integrated deformation monitoring station 39.81193502

- 90.06016279

MS4  Microseismic monitoring Station 4 (shallow borehole)

 Integrated deformation monitoring station 39.78558513

- 90.09557015

MS5  Microseismic monitoring Station 5 (shallow borehole)

 Integrated deformation monitoring station 39.80000524

- 90.07830287

ACZ1
 Deep microseismic station (deep borehole) 39.80034315

- 90.07829648

ACZ2
 Deep microseismic station (deep borehole) 39.80029543

- 90.08801028Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 40 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### APPENDIX D : Planned Construction Design and Plugging and Abandonment Plan Diagra ms for Deep Monitoring Wells and Reservoir Access Tube WellsPost-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 41 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure D-1. Construction design and plugging and abandonment plan for new 5.5-in.-diameter single-level
in -reservoir monitoring well.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 42 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure D-2. Construction design and plugging and abandonment plan for 7- in. -diameter single-level inreservoir monitoring well to be reconfigured from the stratigraphic well.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 43 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure D-3. Construction design and plugging and abandonment plan for the Above Confining Zone monitoring wells.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 44 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure D-4. Construction design and plugging and abandonment plan for the USDW monitoring well.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 45 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) Figure D-5. Construction design and plugging and abandonment plan for the reservoir access tube wells.Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 46 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3) 

### APPENDIX E:Plugging and Abandonment Plans for Deep Monitoring Wells, Reservoir

Acce ss Tube Wells, and Geophysical Wells

Plugging and abandonment plans for the following monitoring wells are provided in this appendix:

Monitoring wells

 ACZ1

 ACZ2

 RAT1

 RAT2

 RAT3

 SLR1-5.5"

 SLR2-7"

 USDW1

Geophysical Wells

 MS1

 MS2

 MS3

 MS4

 MS5

 TM1

 TM2

 TM3

 TM4

 TM5Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 47 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 48 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 49 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 50 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 51 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 52 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 53 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 54 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 55 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 56 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 57 of 64
Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 58 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 59 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 60 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 61 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 62 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 63 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)Post-Injection Site Care and Site Closure Plan for FutureGen Alliance Page E 64 of 64

Permit Number: IL- 137

- 6A -0003 (Well #3)