alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit32.1**

**Certification of Periodic FinancialReport**

**Pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ReAbleTherapeutics Finance LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarterended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onAugust 14, 2007 (the “Report”), I, Kenneth W. Davidson, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, that:

(i)This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (theReport), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(ii)the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Date: August 14, 2007   |
|-------------------------|
|                    |   |
| /s/ Kenneth W. Davidson |   |
| Kenneth W. Davidson     |
| Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Question from Massachusetts**

October 23, 2014

**2012 Baseline** In the Building Block 4 target calculation, EPA multiplies the “net cumulative EE savings as percent of BAU sales” [1] in each year 2020 through 2029 by the “2012 total MWh (sales x 1.0751)” (adjusted for the proportion of sales generated in

- state) [2] to determine the EE MWh target for each year during the compliance period. Assuming that, in most states, total MWh sales will increase from 2012 through 2029, the use of a con stant 2012 sales baseline seems to discount the target EE MWh savings in each future year. For example, if a state’s net cumulative EE savings percent 2020

- 2029 increased 1% per year from 1% to 10%, 2012 sales were 100MWh, and 2020

- 2020 sales increased 10M Wh per year from 110MWh to 200MWh, the total EE MWh saved would be 55MWh under the proposed approach versus 93.5MWh if the net cumulative EE savings percent was multiplied by the projected sales in each compliance year (see Table 1 below). Consequently, the proposed approach forgoes additional savings under the Clean Power Plan and requires states with lower projected sales growth due to historical EE initiatives to save a greater proportion of their future sales than states with higher projected sales growth. TABLE 1: Example Comparative EE Savings

Year Net

Cumulative Savings Percent 2012 MWh Projected MWh Savings w 2012 sales (MWh) Savings w

projected sales (MWh) 2020 1% 100 110 1 1.1 2021 2% 100 120 2 2.4 2022 3% 100 130 3 3.9 2023 4% 100 140 4 5.6 2024 5% 100 150 5 7.5 2025 6% 100 160 6 9.6 2026 7% 100 170 7 11.9 2027 8% 100 180 8 14.4 2028 9% 100 190 9 17.1 2029 10% 100 200 10 20
Total savings (MWh) 55 93.5

[1] GHG Abatement Measures TSD, 5

-43 [1] State Goal Computation TSD, column AP

[1] GHG Abatement Measures TSD, 5

-43 [2] State Goal Computation TSD, column AP
##### 



Exhibit 5.1
 
  
 Re:
    
    Sterling Chemicals, Inc.Registration Statement on Form S-4
  Company Registration Statement Act Exchange Offer 1 4 Outstanding Notes 1 4 Registered Notes Guarantee Registrant Guarantor Indenture Trustee




---



##### 



1.
    
    the Registered Notes proposed to be issued pursuant to the Exchange Offer will
be valid and binding obligations of the Company and will be entitled to the benefits of
the Indenture; and2.
    
    the Guarantee proposed to be issued pursuant to the Exchange Offer will be a
valid and binding obligation of the Registrant Guarantor.
  A.
    
    We express no opinion as to the laws of any jurisdiction other than any
published constitutions, treaties, laws, rules or regulations or judicial or
administrative decisions (Laws) of (i) the State of New York and (ii) the General
Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.B.
    
    This law firm is a registered limited liability partnership organized under the
laws of the State of Texas.C.
    
    The matters expressed in this letter are subject to and qualified and limited
by: (i) applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, fraudulent transfer and conveyance,
reorganization, moratorium and similar Laws affecting creditors rights and remedies
generally; (ii) general principles of equity, including principles of commercial
reasonableness, good faith and fair dealing (regardless of whether enforcement is
sought in a proceeding at law or in equity); (iii) commercial reasonableness and
unconscionability and an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; (iv) the
power of the courts to award damages in lieu of equitable remedies; (v) securities Laws
and public policy underlying such Laws with respect to rights to indemnification and
contribution; and (vi) limitations on the waiver of rights under any stay, extension or
usury Law or other Law, whether




---



#####
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the hhgregg, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry W. Throgmartin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Jerry W. ThrogmartinJerry W. ThrogmartinChairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: February 14, 2008
In The Matter Of: 

SERVED: DECEMBER 7, 2015 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC ? ' 

' ' 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

Docket No. FAA-2015-0205 

JAMES JUAQUIN JORDAN 

Case No. 2014SW700104 

Respondent 

ORDER DISMISSING PROCEEDING 

On October 14, 2015, the parties reconvened by telephone for the Litigation Scheduling 

Conference continued from August 4, 2015. The parties advised the Court that the parties had 

reached a settlement and would provide further notice to the Court upon completing the . 

settlement paperwork. 

On November 13, 2015, the parties filed a Joint Notice of Settlement and Request for 

Termination of the Proceedings, stating that the parties "have reached settlement" and requesting 

"the Court to terminate the proceedings, without prejudice." 

On December 13, 2015, the parties filed an Amended Notice of Settlement and Request 

for Termination of the Proceedings, requesting "the Court to terminate the proceedings, with 

prejudice."1 

After having reviewed the case file, all pleadings and motions, all relevant caselaw, 

statutes, regulations, rules, and authority, and being fully advised; 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 

1. Pirrsuant to 14 C.F .R. § 13.215, the parties have withdrawn their respective pleadings, 

and this proceeding is dismissed with prejudice. 

Attachment: Service List 

1 The Amended Notice also changed the address appearing under the Respondent's signature line. The attached 

Service List reflects the amended address. 
Docket No. FAA-2015-0205 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. MAIL 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1 0002 

Ms. Rebecca Holmes 

Complainant's Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

Office ofthe Regional Counsel (ASW-7) 

2601 Meacham Blvd. 

Fort Worth, TX 76137 

TEL: 817-222-5064 

FAX: 817-222-5945/5092 

Mr. James Juaquin Jordan 

Respondent 

130 Cauley Club Ct 

Duluth, GA 30097 

Judge J.E. Sullivan 

US. Administrative Law Judge 

Office ofHearings, M-20 

U.S. Department ofTransportation 

ONE COPY 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-6941 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

2 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.
Attachment 1 A

FY 2013 VERAs, VSIPs PROCESSING COSTS PER P.L. 112-74

REMITTANCE REPORT FOR FY 2013 VERAs

Remittance Date: 

Reporting Entity: POC Name: 

POC Email address: POC Phone Number: FY 2013 Retirement Month:

IPAC (MM/YYYY)

Funds submitted by: EFT FY 2013 VERAs

(Indicate IPAC, EFT or CHECK) CHECK

Payroll Office Number: Agency Location Code: Number of Covered Employees Amount Submitted

(Column 1) (Column 2) (Column 3) Column 3 x $101.89

FERS

TOTALS (A) $

CSRS

TOTALS (B) $

AMOUNT SUBMITTED $

(Must Equal A + B)

I certify to the best of my knowledge, the accuracy and completeness of this Remittance Report. (To Be Reproduced Locally)

(Use additional forms if needed)

Signature Name - Printed
Attachment 1 B

FY 2013 VERAs, VSIPs PROCESSING COSTS PER P.L. 112-74

REMITTANCE REPORT FOR FY 2013 VSIPs

Remittance Date: 

Reporting Entity: POC Name: 

POC Email address: POC Phone Number: FY 2013 Retirement Month:

IPAC (MM/YYYY)

Funds submitted by: EFT FY 2013 VSIPs

(Indicate IPAC, EFT or CHECK) CHECK

Payroll Office Number: Agency Location Code: Number of Covered Employees Amount Submitted

(Column 1) (Column 2) (Column 3) Column 3 x $101.89

FERS

TOTALS (A) $

CSRS

TOTALS (B) $

AMOUNT SUBMITTED $

(Must Equal A + B)

(To Be Reproduced Locally)

I certify to the best of my knowledge, the accuracy and completeness of this Remittance Report. (Use additional forms if needed)

Signature Name - Printed
Attachment 1 C

FY 2013 VERAs, VSIPs PROCESSING COSTS PER P.L. 112-74

REMITTANCE REPORT FOR FY 2013 VERAs with VSIPs

Remittance Date: 

Reporting Entity: POC Name: 

POC Email address: POC Phone Number: FY 2013 Retirement Month:

IPAC (MM/YYYY)

Funds submitted by: EFT FY 2013 VERAs with VSIPs

(Indicate IPAC, EFT or CHECK) CHECK

Payroll Office Number: Agency Location Code: Number of Covered Employees Amount Submitted

(Column 1) (Column 2) (Column 3) Column 3 x $101.89

FERS

TOTALS (A)

CSRS

TOTALS (B) $

AMOUNT SUBMITTED $

(Must Equal A + B)

(To Be Reproduced Locally)

I certify to the best of my knowledge, the accuracy and completeness of this Remittance Report. (Use additional forms if needed)

Signature Name - Printed
**Exhibit 10.1**

**FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE**

**HAWKER BEECHCRAFT SAVINGS AND INVESTMENT PLAN**

ThisFourth Amendment to the Hawker Beechcraft Savings and Investment Plan is made this 27th day of September, 2010. 

**WHEREAS,** Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (the“Company”) maintains the Hawker Beechcraft Savings and Investment Plan (the “Plan”); and 

**WHEREAS,**the Company has reserved the right to amend the Plan. 

**NOW, THEREFORE**in consideration of the foregoing premises,effective October 4, 2010, Section 4.03 of the Plan is amended and restated to read as follows: 

Section 4.03. Employer Matching Contribution. Subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter provided, theEmployer will make a matching contribution for each eligible Participant (as defined in Article II) as follows: 

For each eligible participant who is covered under the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement the matchingcontribution will be equal to 100% of the first 4% of Compensation contributed by such Participant as an elective before-tax or after-tax contribution pursuant to Section 4.04. 

For all other eligible participants the matching contribution will be equal to 50% of the first 4% of Compensationcontributed by such Participant as an elective before-tax or after-tax contribution pursuant to Section 4.04. 

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no Participant will accrue or be entitled to any matching contribution hereunder unless and until such contribution is contributed to the Trust.

The amount of the Employer Matching Contribution for each eligible Participant will be determined based on theamount or percentage contributed as a salary reduction contribution for each pay period and not on the total percentage contributed throughout the year. 

The amount of the Employer’s matching contribution made for each Participant pursuant to this Section 4.03 will be allocated to the Participant’s Matching Account. 

The Company reserves, by action of its governing body, the right to terminate, suspend, or modify contributions at anytime and from time to time. 

 
1 

 

**IN WITNESSWHEREOF,** the foregoing amendment is executed as of the day, month, and year first appearing above. 

 
HAWKER BEECHCRAFT CORPORATIONBy: 
/s/ Sharad B. Jiwanlal
 Name: Sharad B. Jiwanlal Title: Vice President, Human Resources
 

ATTEST:

Cynthia L. Norman

 
2
## Court of Appeals
Sixth Appellate District of Texas

JUDGMENT

Marcy Lena Mejia, Appellant

No. 06

- 12

- 00211

- CR v.

State of Texas, Appellee Appeal from the 336th District Court of
Fannin County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. CR

- 12

- 24507 ). Memorandum Opinion delivered
by Ju stice Moseley, Chief Justice Morriss

and Justice Carter participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed

for want of jurisdiction . Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We further order that the appellant, Marcy Lena Mejia, pay all costs of this appeal.

RENDERED MAY 17, 2013

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:
Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 05-302 Date: June 9, 2005 

Subject: FEHBP Cost Factor for the Third Quarter of FY 2005 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) 

for the third quarter of FY 2005. The annual imputed cost factors for all civilian benefit programs 

will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2005. 

The imputed cost factor for the third quarter of FY 2005 related to the FEHB is $1,236. Thus, the FY 

2005 year-to-date imputed cost factor related to the FEHB is: 

1st Quarter $1,195

2nd Quarter $1,215

3rd Quarter $1,236

Year-to-date $3,646

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. You may of course call us on 202-606-0606. 

 

 

 

Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

Financial Policy Group 

Center for Financial Services
#### LEWIS et al. v. NEWTON et al.

No. 9420.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 20, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Feb. 28, 1934.

VanderHo'even & Greathouse, of San Antonio, for appellants.

Arnold & Cozby, of San Antonio, for ap-pellees.

MURRAY, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the trial judge granting a temposary injunction *525restraining appellants from selling certain real estate under a power of sale contained in a deed of trust.

The application for injunction is based upon the provisions of the so-called Moratorium Daw, House Bill No. 231, chapter 102, p. 225, General Laws 43d Legislature, 1933 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2218b).

We have previously held this act to he unconstitutional and void. Murphy v. Phillips (Tex. Civ. App.) 63 S.W.(2d) 404, We adhere to our holding in that case.

The order of the trial judge will be reversed, and the injunction dissolved.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Borg-Johnson, Electronics, Inc., Monroe Gaine, Herman Liebenson and David L. Ratke, Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 23, 1958.

*Louis J. Lefhowite, Attorney-General,*for plaintiff.

*Bass <& Friend*for defendants.

Edgar J. Nathan, J.

This action is brought by the Attorney-General under section 91 of the General Corporation Law seeking the annulment of the charter of the defendant corporation and its dissolution. The basis of the action is alleged fraudulent advertising in the sale of miniature radios.

There is now before the court a motion by order to show cause dated May 21, 1958 for a temporary stay in substance enjoining defendants from continuing their business pending the determination of a motion for the appointment of a temporary receiver. There is also before the court an application by defendants to vacate a similar stay contained in a previous order to show cause dated May 15, 1958 obtained ex parte.

The first question before the court is the validity of the temporary restraining order contained in the ex parte order to show cause dated May 15,1958. It may be seriously questioned whether the order of this court obtained ex parte was valid to , *929the extent that it suspended the business of the corporation or restrained the officers and directors from exercising their powers and duties (General Corporation Law, § 135). However, there is no doubt that the court has the power, ex parte or otherwise, to restrain specific corporate acts when necessary to preserve the *status quo.*

Upon the Attorney-General’s second order to show cause defendants have had adequate notice, have appeared and been heard, as well as upon the motion for receivership. It is now evident that a limited restraining order is essential to the preservation of the rights of the parties pending final determination on the Attorney-General’s application for the appointment of a temporary receiver.

The corporate defendant having consented to the segregation of a fund in the amount of $100,000 within the State for securing any refunds or other damages incident to this proceeding, only the following specific acts of the corporation, its officers, directors, agents and employees will be temporarily enjoined:

1. Removing from the State of New York, or dissipating any corporate assets.

2. Paying any sums or transferring any assets to any officer or director or stockholder of the corporation, either directly or indirectly.

3. Placing any advertising in any medium whatsoever.

4. Soliciting in any way the sale of its miniature radios.

5. Paying any person, or any firm or corporation in which any of the defendants is an officer, stockholder, or employee, or has any financial interest.

The relief sought both by defendant’s application to vacate the temporary stay in the order to show cause dated May 15, 1958 and the relief sought in plaintiff’s order to show cause dated May 21,1958 is in each case granted to the extent indicated herein.

Settle order accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3447 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3447

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXTENSION.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding the time period specified in 
section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 U.S.C. 806) that would 
otherwise apply to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission project 
numbered 12642, the Commission may, at the request of the licensee for 
the project, and after reasonable notice, in accordance with the good 
faith, due diligence, and public interest requirements of that section 
and the Commission's procedures under that section, extend the time 
period during which the licensee is required to commence the 
construction of the project for up to three consecutive 2-year periods 
from the date of the expiration of the extension originally issued by 
the Commission.
    (b) Reinstatement of Expired License.--If the period required for 
commencement of construction of the project described in subsection (a) 
has expired prior to the date of the enactment of this Act, the 
Commission shall reinstate the license effective as of the date of its 
expiration and the first extension authorized under subsection (a) 
shall take effect on the date of such expiration.

            Passed the House of Representatives March 15, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                               H. R. 3447

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

     To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of a 
                         hydroelectric project.
```
United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 99-222 Date: November 18, 1999 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Special Open Season

for Enrollees of Premier Health Care of Arizona, Enrollment Code 9A and

9B

Premier Health Care of Arizona, enrollment codes 9A and 9B, is insolvent and has ceased

operations in the state of Arizona effective November 15, 1999. This plan will no longer

participate in the FEHB Program. 

Since the 2000 FEHB Guides are already printed, the plan’s name appears in the Guides. Please

do not allow employees to enroll in this plan. 

We are authorizing a special open season for plan enrollees to choose new plans. If you have

employees in the area served by the plan, we ask that you notify them directly of the plan’s

withdrawal. 

This special open season is effective immediately and will continue through December 18, 1999. 

Agencies are, however, asked to apply this cutoff date liberally. Enrollment changes during this

special open season may be made effective retroactive or prospective to the first day of a pay

period that begins after November 15, 1999 and no later than December 18, 1999.

Since this special open season overlaps the regular open season, agencies will need to identify

their employees enrolled in this plan, to ensure these changes are not processed as a regular

open season change resulting in a year 2000 effective date.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division

 _____________________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System