alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Homer MARTIN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20854.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1939.

Floyd Jones, of Breckenridge,- for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

• Conviction is for driving an automobile upon a public highway while appellant was intoxicated, punishment being a fine of $75 and five days in jail.

Since perfecting his appeal appellant has filed his affidavit advising that *he*does not desire to further prosecute his appeal, and at his request same is dismissed.
#### CARR v. STATE.

No. 17851.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 28, 1935.

Durwood' Bradley, of Lubbock, and E„ A. Bills, of Littlefield, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully driving an automobile while intoxicated; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for nine months.

It has been made known to this court by the sheriff of Cochran county that on the first day of May, 1935, the' appellant es*722caped from the jail of said county and is still at large. Under the terms of article 824, C. C. P., as amended by Acts of 1933, c. 34 (Vernon’s Ann. C. C. P. art. 824), and article 825, the escape of the appellant deprives this court of jurisdiction of the appeal, and it is therefore dismissed.
**Exhibit 12.1**                   **For the three-month period**  **For the nine-month period**   **ended September 30,**  **ended September 30,** *(all dollar amounts in thousands)* **2006**  **2005**  **2006**  **2005** **Earnings:**                                 Pre-tax income before income (loss)from equity investees,extraordinary gain or loss, or gains onsale of properties $(2,299) $(13,234) $485  $(30,367)Amoritzation of interest capitalized  600   600   1,800   1,800 Interest capitalized  (4,714)  (3,315)  (11,404)  (7,138)Distributed income of equity investees  2,553   1,017   7,345   3,075 Fixed charges  38,081   40,362   111,470   107,718                               Total earnings $34,221  $25,430  $109,696  $75,088                               **Fixed Charges:**                Interest expense $31,937  $35,444  $95,685  $96,343 Capitalized interest  4,714   3,315   11,404   7,138 Debt costs amortization  1,430   1,603   4,381   4,237                               Total Fixed Charges $38,081  $40,362  $111,470  $107,718                               **Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges**  (a)   (a)  1.0   (a)              (a) *For the three months ended September 30, 2006, the aggregateamount of fixed charges exceeded our earnings by approximately$3.9 million, which is the amount of additional earnings thatwould have been required to achieve a ratio of earnings to fixedcharges of 1.0x for such period. The deficiency of the ratio ofearnings to fixed charges for the three months ended September30, 2006, is primarily due to the classification of operationsfor assets held for sale and sold as discontinued operations.* * * *For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, theaggregate amount of fixed charges exceeded our earnings byapproximately $14.9 million and $32.6 million, respectively,which is the amount of additional earnings that would have beenrequired to achieve a ratio of earnings to fixed charges of 1.0xfor such period. The deficiency of the ratio of earnings tofixed charges for the three and nine months ended September 30,2005, is primarily due to the classification of operations forassets held for sale and sold as discontinued operations andamortization of intangible assets acquired in the Cornerstonemerger.*The ratios of earnings to fixed charges were computed by dividing earnings by fixed charges.For this purpose, earnings consist of pre-tax income from continuing operations before adjustmentfor minority interest in consolidated subsidiaries or income or loss from equity investees, gainson sale of properties, distributed income of equity investees, fixed charges and amortization ofcapitalized interest excluding interest costs capitalized. Fixed charges consist of interestexpense (including interest costs capitalized) and amortization of debt issuance costs.
usbank

All of us serving you

**AnnualStatement of Compliance MorganStanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C5**

*VIA: EMAIL*Morgan Stanley Capital I Inc. 1585 Broadway New York, New York 10036 Attention: Stephen Holmes stephen.holmes@morganstanley.com *baml_17g5requests@baml.com*

Re: 

ThePooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of July 1,2012 among Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc., as depositor, Bank of America, NationalAssociation, as master servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, asspecial servicer, Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor, Wells Fargo Bank, NationalAssociation, as custodian, and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee, certificate administrator,certificate registrar and authenticating agent 

            I,Kimberly O. Jacobs, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administrator,as a certifying servicer hereby certify that:             (1) A review of the activities of the Certificate Administrator duringthe preceding calendar year and of the performance of the Certificate Administrator under theAgreement has been made under my supervision; and             (2) To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the CertificateAdministrator has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout such year 

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein have the meanings setforth in the Agreement. 

Date: March 12, 2014 

      U.S. Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator ascertifying servicer By: /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs       Kimberly O. Jacobs       Senior Vice President
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 3, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 409 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-770, K2024-63.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22743 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.2
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Information Systems Associates, Inc. (the "Company") for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Michael R. Hull Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Michael R. Hull
 Michael R. Hull
 Chief Financial Officer
 Date: November 12, 2010
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Exhibit 10.2


 


AMENDMENT TO STOCK PURCHASE AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Stock
Purchase Agreement (this "Amendment") is made as of October 31, 2017 with reference to that certain Common Stock
Purchase Agreement dated as of September 28, 2017 (the "Stock Purchase Agreement") by and between Andy Z Fan (the
“Seller”) and Yap Nee Seng (the “Purchaser”). The Seller and the Purchaser may be referred
to herein singularly as a “Party” and collectively, as the “Parties”. Unless otherwise indicated
herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition shall have the respective meanings specified in the Stock Purchase
Agreement.


 


WHEREAS the Seller and Purchaser desire to
amend the Stock Purchase Agreement as provided below.


 


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual
agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged,
the parties, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows:


 


Section 1.04(a) 1 of the Stock Purchase Agreement
is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as follows:


 


“(a) It is agreed that the full amount
of the Purchase Price will be wire transferred to the Escrow Account on or before October 26, 2017 and that the closing of the
sale and purchase of the Shares (the “Closing”) will take place on November 3, 2017.  It is agreed that all of
the Shares and the Documents shall remain in the Escrow Account until the full Purchase Price of $375,000.00 has been paid into
Escrow, whereupon the Closing shall take place and the Documents shall be disbursed to the Purchaser and the Purchase Price shall
be shall be disbursed as per instructions of the Seller’ Representative.”


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have
caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives as of the day and year first above written.


 


	THE SELLER:	 
	 	 
	ANDY Z. FAN	 
	 	 
	/s/ Andy Fan	 
	Andy Z. Fan	 
	 	 
	THE PURCHASER:  	 
	 	 
	YAP NEE SENG	 
	 	 
	/s/ Yap Nee Seng	 
	Yap Nee Seng
Exhibit 32.1.1

CERTIFICATION

I, W. W. Boisture, Jr., principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft
Acquisition Company, LLC (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 29, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ W. W. Boisture, Jr.       
|W. W. Boisture, Jr., President
|(Principal Executive Officer) 

July 15, 2009
# Official Journal C 235A/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 235A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6212 July 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 235A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6212 July 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Council |
| 2019/C 235 A/01 | Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/148/19 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Council

2019/C 235 A/01

Notice of vacancy CONS/AD/148/19

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Loraine POWELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20788.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1939.

M. E. Lawrence, of Eastland, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

. g The conviction is for burglary; penalty assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

Since his appeal was perfected the appellant has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted, and the appeal ordered dismissed.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 03-312 Date: December 1, 2003 

Subject: New Option B Withholding Rates

This Letter transmits new withholding rates for Option B coverage under the Federal 

Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program for the upper-age bands. The new rates are effective 

with the first day of the first pay period beginning on or after January 1, 2004. 

The new Option B withholding rates, per $1,000 of coverage, are as follows: 

Age Band Biweekly Monthly 

70-74 $1.03 $2.232

75-79 $1.43 $3.098

80 and over $1.83 $3.965

If you have any questions about the matters discussed in this letter, we would prefer that you 

email them to us at finance@opm.gov. You may also call us on (202) 606-0606. 

 Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

Financial Policy Group
### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OFAPPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

No. 11-10935 Summary Calendar

DONNIE LEE YOUREE, Petitioner-Appellant

v. REBECCA TAMEZ, Warden, Respondent-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:10-CV-935
Before BENAVIDES, STEWART, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Donnie Lee Youree, federal priso n e r # 9 1069-020, appeals the dismissal for lack of jurisd i c t i o n o f his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition challenging his classification as an armed career offender under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) pursuant t o his federal conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm

. Yo u r e e argues that he i s actually innocent of the career offender enhancement on account of the vacatur of his 1972 predicate conviction for voluntary

man s l a u gh t er. This argument was unsuccessfully raised in his untimely U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D June 20 , 20 12 Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm inedt hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 11-10935 Document: 00511893341 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/20/2012No. 11-10935

28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Youree v. United States , Nos. 5:09-CV-9006 2 HL, 5:02-CR-62 HL, 2009 WL 6338019 (M.D. G a. Sept. 17, 2009) (unpublished). Th e G ov e rnment has moved for summary affirmance or, in the alt e r n ative , f o r a n extension of time to file a brief. Youree’s argument that his a c t u a l innocence cl a i m i s cognizable in a § 2241 petition is foreclosed by Kinder v. Purdy , 222 F.3d 209, 213-14 (5th C i r. 2000), which held that a petitioner’s argument that he is actually innocent of being a career offender is not the type of argument that warrants review under § 2241 b e c a u s e the petitioner is not asserting that he is actually innocent of the underlying crime for which he was convicted. T h e Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, the G o vernment’s alternative motion for an extension of time to file a br i e f i s DENIED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

2 Case: 11-10935 Document: 00511893341 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/20/2012
6/1/2011Number of units meeting the current MACT floors:Units meeting “Lignite” Hg beyond-thefloorRespective Hg + PM+ HCl floor“Bituminous/subbituminous” Hg floor PM floor HCl floorExisting source 3 39 151 161 180New source* 3 0 4 18 14* Units meeting new-source floor on a lb/MWhor lb/GWh basis based on 2010 ICR dataCurrent MACT floors:MACT floor “Lignite” Hg beyond-thefloor“Bituminous/subbituminous”Hg floorPM floor HCl floorExisting source 4 lb/TBtu 1.20 lb/TBtu 0.03 lb/MMBtu 0.002 lb/MMBtuNew source 0.04 lb/GWh(4 lb/TBtu)0.0002 lb/GWh(0.0185 lb/TBtu)0.05 lb/MWh(0.02 lb/MMBtu)0.3 lb/GWh(0.00005 lb/MMBtu)
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZEEZOO SOFTWARE CORP. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period  ended July 31, 2007 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Erickson Mercado,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                             /s/ Erickson Mercado
                                             -----------------------------------
Date: September 13, 2007                     Erickson Mercado
                                             Chief Financial Officer
#### PREIBISCH v. LAY.

No. 10661.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

Dec. 1, 1938.

C. C. Glenn, .of Sealy, for appellant.

J. E. Edmundson, of Bellville, for ap-pellee.

CODY, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered on the verdict of a jury by the County Court of Waller County. The cause itself originated in a justice court of Waller County. The appeal is here upon the transcript without either a Statement of Facts, or Finding of Facts. As the pleadings of appellees, if they were proved, as we must assume they were, are sufficient to support the court’s judgment, we see no basis, in the absence of a Statement of Facts, to set aside such judgment. Wester*671ly Supply Corporation v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 244; Anchor v. Wichita County Water Imp. Dist. No. 2, 129 Tex. 385, 103 S.W.2d 135, 112 A.L.R. 70, affirming 123 Tex. 105, 66 S.W.2d 657. If appellant is attempting to bring to our attention by bills of exception certain evidence that he may have introduced on the trial of the cause, and may rely on as inconsistent with the facts found by the judgment of the court below, we must rule that this cannot be done. Dull v. Drake, 68 Tex. 205, 4 S.W. 364. Furthermore, it appears from the judgment of the court below that the jury found, as a fact, that the mortgage on which appellee A. A. Lay based his claim of prior right to $113.92 of the, $133.45 on deposit in the bank, was placed of record in the Mortgage Records of Waller County before appellant’s attachment lien was perfected. ■ Evidence- inconsistent with this priority, in the absence of a Statement of Facts, cannot be considered by us, and cannot even be brought to our notice — at least not in the manner attempted by appellant.

As we affirm the judgment of the County Court, we content ourselves with this mere memorandum opinion indicating the point on which affirmance has been adjudged.

Affirmed.

MONTEITH, J., participating as Special Commissioner.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DJO Finance LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 3, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on August 6, 2010 (the “Report”), I,Leslie H. Cross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                                    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  August 6, 2010             |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                   |   |
| /s/  LESLIE H. CROSS                   |   |
| Leslie  H. Cross                       |   |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |   |

 

----
S1()-I()()3()5-()4.S 

February 26,2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. LaHood 

Secretary 

U.S/De J3aH:meht of Trahisportatlbn 

1200 New Jersey Ave, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0034 

Dear Mr. Secretary: 

Thank you for the opportunity to express my support for the application for antitrust 

immunity and proposed joint business agreement filed by American Airlines and Japan 

Airlines. The proposed alliance between these two airlines is vital for the oneworld 

alliance to compete effectively with the Star and SkyTeam alliances. This increased 

alliance competition will in turn enhance the benefits of the Department's Open Skies 

policy - first by solidifying U.S. - Japan Open Skies, then by serving as a foundation for 

further liberalization across Asia. 

After a thorough review, I encourage the Department of Transportation to approve this 

application as it would enable these oneworld alliance airlines to work closely together 

to deliver highly competitive air transportation services. Approval for AA/JAL alliance 

will have a positive impact on air travel by offering customers more service, scheduling 

and pricing options and will help to ensure that customers continue to benefit from the 

competition afforded by three competitive air alliances. 

RO. Drawer 5820 

Lake Charies,U 70606 

phone 337.477.6051 

&X337.478A826 

www.flylahecharlesxoin 

I urge you to quickly approve this application. 

Sincerely, 

Heath Allen 

Executive Director ' 

hallen(a>flylakecharles.com