alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.2







November 6, 2017






Sandra Garbiso
10654 Ouray Court
Commerce City, CO  80022


Re:  Promotion to Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer


Dear Sandra:


It is our pleasure to confirm the details of your promotion to Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer with Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc. reporting to Scott Fenoglio, Senior Vice President, Finance & Planning.  Your promotion will be effective Friday, November 3, 2017.  


Your compensation will increase to an annual salary of $225,000 paid on an exempt salaried bi-weekly basis subject to all regular withholdings and deductions, and that increase will be applied retroactively back to August 1, 2017, the date of the Company’s reduction in force.  


This new opportunity will also provide you an increase in the Company’s Short Term Incentive Program (the “STIP”) administered at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.  Your “target” cash bonus opportunity under the STIP will increase to 50% of your salary effective on August 1, 2017.  You will be eligible for a pro-rata payment for this new STIP level for the remainder year of participation.  Bonuses under the STIP for each year, if any, will typically be paid in March of the following year around the time the Company’s audited financials are completed.


If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me at any time.  I look forward to working with you in this new role.




                                                                                    Sincerely,






                                                                   /s/ Seth Bullock
                                                                     Seth Bullock
Interim Chief Executive Officer


Acknowledged and Agreed:


                                                      


/s/ Sandra Garbiso
Sandra Garbiso
Exhibit 10.21

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE

LUTHER BURBANK SAVINGS

AMENDED & RESTATED

SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is adopted this        day of               , 2017, by and between LUTHER BURBANK SAVINGS, a California corporation, (the “Bank”) and JOHN BIGGS (the “Executive”).

 

The Bank and the Executive executed the Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement effective as of January 1, 2005 (the “Agreement”).

 

The Bank and the Executive executed the First Amendment to the Luther Burbank Savings Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement effective as of December 5, 2008 (the “First Amendment”).

 

The undersigned hereby amend the Agreement for the purpose of adjusting the Normal Retirement Date and amending the amount of the Normal Retirement Benefit.  Therefore, the following changes shall be made:

 

Section 1.7 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

 

1.7                               “Compensation” means the total annual Base Salary that would be paid to the Executive during the Plan Year in which Separation from Service occurs minus one hundred thirty five thousand dollars ($135,000).

 

Section 1.12 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

 

1.12                        “Normal Retirement Date” means the first day following the Separation from Service by the Executive as an employee of the Bank.

 

IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Bank and the Executive hereby consent to this Second Amendment.

 

	
Executive
    	
 
    	
LUTHER   BURBANK SAVINGS
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
By
    	
 
    
	
JOHN   BIGGS
    	
 
    	
Title
    	
 
    


 

1
```

[Federal Register: October 12, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 196)]
[Proposed Rules]               
[Page 62488]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr12oc10-21]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

LIBRARY OF CONGRESS

Copyright Office

37 CFR Part 201

[Docket No. RM 2010-3]

 
Refunds Under the Cable Statutory License

AGENCY: Copyright Office, Library of Congress.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Copyright Office published in the Federal Register of 
October 4, 2010, a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning refunds 
under the cable statutory license. This document corrects the date for 
submitting reply comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ben Golant, Assistant General Counsel, 
and Tanya M. Sandros, Deputy General Counsel, Copyright GC/I&R, P.O. 
Box 70400, Washington, DC 20024. Telephone: (202) 707-8380. Telefax: 
(202) 707-8366.

Correction

    In proposed rule RM 2010-3, make the following correction in the 
Dates section. On page 61117 in the 2nd column, correct the DATES 
caption to read:

DATES: Written comments must be received in the Office of the General 
Counsel of the Copyright Office no later than November 3, 2010. Reply 
comments must be received in the Office of the General Counsel of the 
Copyright Office no later than December 3, 2010.

    Dated: October 6, 2010.
Tanya Sandros,
Deputy General Counsel, U.S. Copyright Office.
[FR Doc. 2010-25652 Filed 10-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P
```
#### W. A. BURLESON v. STATE.

No. 17739.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Chrisman & Russell, of Cleburne, and W. E. Myres and Joseph M. Mills, both of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for possessing intoxicating liquor for purposes of sale; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

This is a prosecution had under the provisions of what is known as the Dean Law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in an opinion this day handed down in Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the judgment in this case will be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
ii
f_ 

# I 

# l ' I ' I: 

### ' I t r I '

## ~ 

# ! 

# !**~**

'

## ~ 

# I ! i I 

# !
I. (. 

### j: " 

## f

9, Pourbaix, Mareel. Aqueous Solutions. Atlas of**Electroche~ical** Equilibria in Pergamon, Great Britain, 1966, 

# ,, ' '2



# c ...a.

I 

### 0 (1'1



## ......
#### Clyde LINNEY, Appellant, v. STATE, Appellee.

No. 20129.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 12, 1938.

Alvin Nemir, of Sweetwater, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for passing a forged instrument, punishment assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising this court that he desires to accept his sentence and no further prosecute his appeal, and at his request his said appeal is dismissed.
Attachment 1: Going Green – View Your FEHB Brochure Online or 

Contact Your Plan for a Paper Brochure

Please remember that paper copies of health plan brochures will not be 

automatically mailed to Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program 

members.

Health plan brochures are available online at www.opm.gov/FEHBbrochures or 

on your health plan’s website. Accessing brochures online will help to lower 

administrative costs and protect natural resources. 

Your FEHB health plan will contact you to offer the option of obtaining your

2017 benefit brochure online or requesting a paper copy of the benefit brochure. 

If you did not previously request a paper copy of your health plan’s 

brochure, you will not automatically receive one. If you change plans, your 

new health plan will mail you a paper copy of its brochure.

If you choose to review the online version of your plan’s benefit brochure, you 

will still receive the Open Season package in the mail. This package will 

include an explanation of benefit changes and your new premium rate for 2017. 

Go to www.opm.gov/FEHBbrochures to view your FEHB health plan brochure 

and to get more information about our Going Green initiative.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of SaveDaily, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeff Mahony, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








/s/    JEFF MAHONY





Jeff Mahony


Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer





November 14, 2011








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.  The foregoing certifications are accompanying the Company's Form 10-Q solely pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 33 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        H.R.33

                     One Hundred Fourteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE FIRST SESSION

          Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday,
           the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen

                                 An Act

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that emergency 
 services volunteers are not taken into account as employees under the 
 shared responsibility requirements contained in the Patient Protection 
                        and Affordable Care Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. FURTHER CONTINUING APPROPRIATIONS.
    The Continuing Appropriations Resolution, 2015 (Public Law 113-164; 
128 Stat. 1867) is amended by striking the date specified in section 
106(3) and inserting ``March 6, 2015''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

The undersigned, Ken MacAlpine, President, Secretary and
Treasurer of Sombrio Capital Corp., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sombrio Capital
      Corp. for the period ended January 31, 2010 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Sombrio Capital Corp.                                                                   

Dated: March 12, 2010

/s/ Ken MacAlpine Ken MacAlpine President,
Secretary and Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Sombrio Capital
Corp. and will be retained by Sombrio Capital Corp. and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
      TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of
      Sunrise Mining Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31,
      2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
      (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby
      certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects
      the
      financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Mining
      Corporation.





Date:
                January 22, 2008
            
            
            /s/
                Shaojun SunShaojun
                  Sun, Chief Financial Officer
#### McCAULY v. STATE.

No. 19772.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 25, 1938.

H. Greenberg, of Galveston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for robbery with firearms; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for thirty years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### George Elliott, Appellant, *v.*Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

February 27, 1958.

*Richard 8. Lane*for appellant.

*Lester Samuels, Abraham Shapiro*and *Emanuel Haber*for respondent.

The order should be affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Hofstadter, Steuer and Aurelio, JJ., concur.

Order affirmed, etc.
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
PURSANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED BY SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 14, 2010
    By:
    /s/ Jerry S. Von RohrName:
    Jerry S. Von RohrTitle:
    Chief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-8pertaining to Grant Prideco, Inc. 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan of our reports dated March 1, 2007relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of GrantPrideco, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on those financialstatements and financial statement schedule and includes an explanatory paragraph regarding theCompany’s adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R), *Share-based Payment,*on January 1, 2006) and management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Grant Prideco, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2006./s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPHouston, Texas
ii 

f_ 

I 

' l I 

' I: 

I ' 

t 

r 

I 

' 

~ 

! 

! 

~ 

' 

~ 

I 

! 

i 

I 

! 

I. 

(. 

j: " f 

9, Pourbaix, Mareel. 

Aqueous Solutions. Atlas of Electroche~ical Equilibria in 

Pergamon, Great Britain, 1966, 

,, 

' '2 

c 

...a. 

I 

0 

(1'1 

......
EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 of
IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the consolidated financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: May 15, 2008
    /s/ Steven DarakSteven DarakChief Financial Officer, Investors Mortgage
Holdings,
Inc., manager of IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC
#### BROWN v. RICKS.

No. 5310.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Oct. 13, 1938.

*851S. J. Dotson, of Longview, for appellant.

R. M. Washburn, of Gladewater, for ap-pellee.

HALL, Justice.

Appellee brought this suit against appellant in the County Court of Titus County for the sum of $714 for labor performed as a mechanic on one of appellant’s oil wells, and for foreclosure of his laborer’s lien on certain oil well equipment.

Appellant answered with general demurrer, general denial, and certain offsets.

On plea of privilege the case was transferred to Gregg County where trial was had before the court without a jury, and resulted in judgment for appellee for the sum of $594, together with foreclosure of his laborer’s lien on certain oil well equipment. The case is now properly before this court for review.

Appellant’s first proposition is:.

> “In this suit, the plaintiff is seeking to recover judgment in the sum of Seven Hundred and Fourteen ($714.00) Dollars with a foreclosure of a laborer’s and mechanic’s lien on personal property described as oil well derrick, oil well drilling rig and the boilers, pumps and other appurtenances used in connection therewith, and his pleadings contained no allegations showing the value of such personal property, and for said reason failed to show jurisdiction in the County Court to hear said cause, and the pleadings were subject to defendant’s general demurrer.”

This proposition raises the controlling question on'this appeal. There was no allegation in appellee’s petition of the value of the property on which a foreclosure of his laborer’s lien was sought, and a general demurrer was urged by appellant against said petition for that reason. The trial court overruled appellant’s general demurrer, and, in our opinion, his action in so doing constitutes error. The jurisdiction of the trial court in matters of this character must be determined by the allegations in plaintiff’s pleadings.

“It is well settled that ‘jurisdiction, in so far as matter or amount in value in controversy is concerned, must be determined by the petition, and that question is concluded by its averments in so far as they state facts in relation to the thing in controversy, unless it otherwise appears that a plaintiff in framing his petition has improperly sought to give jurisdiction where it does not properly belong.’ (Dwyer v. Bassett & Bassett, 63 Tex. 274, 276); and, further, that a petition in a suit in county court for the recovery of an amount within the court’s jurisdiction and for foreclosure of a contract lien securing the debt upon personal property is insufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of, the court and is subject to general demurrer as failing affirmatively to show jurisdiction, when it contains no allegation of the value of the property.” Brown v. Peters, 127 Tex. 300, 94 S.W.2d 129, 130, and cases there cited.

For the error pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of DC Brands International, Inc., a Colorado corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Bob Armstrong, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.











/s/ Bob Armstrong


Chief Financial Officer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


August 20, 2012