alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TATE v. McGRAW.

No. 11251.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

July 16, 1934.

For former opinion, see 70 S.W.(2d) 467.

Hamp P. Abney and N. B. Birge, both of Sherman, for appellant.

Webb & Webb, of Sherman, for appellee.

LOONEY, Justice.

In our original opinion,-there appears the following language, to wit: “Appellant’s homestead was ordered sold, in fact was sold by the sheriff under an order of sale, to satisfy, not only the taxes due thereon,'but poll taxes as well, besides the penalty imposed by statute for delinquency and costs of suit. As the items named, other than taxes due upon the homestead, constituted no lien, it follows that the attempted foreclpsure as to these was without jurisdiction and that the order of sale and the sheriff’s deed thereunder, were void and passed no title.” We now think there was error in saying that the judgment and proceedings thereunder were void, because of the attempted foreclosure of a lien upon the homestead for the accrued penalties. In that respect, the opinion is in conflict with the decision of the Supreme Court, in City of San Antonio v. Toepperwein, 104 Tex. 43, 133 S. W. 416; in fact, is in conflict with section 15 of article 8 of the "Constitution, which imposes a special lien on all landed property (including the homestead), for the amount of taxes due and penalties imposed for delinquencies.

We therefore modify the opinion, reported in 70 S.W.(2d) 467, so as to harmonize our position with that of the Supreme Court, but the judgment, heretofore rendered, is not disturbed, or in any sense modified.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 366 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents                           ( print page 80283)                        are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-718, K2024-11.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22656 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. DOT-OST-1995-569 for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7, 843)

MOTION OFAMERICAN EAGLEAIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
Communications with respect to this document shouldbe sent to: DANIEL P. GARTON President American Eagle Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 KATHLEEN SOLED Vice President &General Counsel American Eagle Airlines, Inc. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5494 DFW Airport, Texas 75261 (817) 967-1574 kate.soled@aa.com
March 20, 2013 FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc. 1101 17th Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20036 (202) 496-5642 francis.heil@aa.comBEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D. C.

Motion of AMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. for confidential treatment under Rule 12 (Form 41, Schedules B-7, 843) DOT-OST-1995-569

MOTION OFAMERICAN EAGLE AIRLINES, INC. FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDERRULE 12
American EagleAirlines, Inc., under 14 CFR 302.12, herebymoves that its Form41, Schedule B-7 for 4Q2012 and B-43 for YE2012, be accorded confidential treatment andwithheld frompublic disclosure. The information for which confidential treatment is requestedpertains toAmerican Eagle's airframes and aircraft engine acquisitions and retirements. In accordance with the Department's Final Rule on SubmittingAirline Datavia the Internet, 75 Fed. Reg. 41580, 41582, we are uploading our confidential report electronically to the following website: http://esubmit.rita.dot.gov On June 5, 1995, James W. Mitchell, Director, Office of Airline Statistics, the Department granted confidential treatment for a 10-yearperiod to similar data filed byAmerican-2- Airlines. For the reasons stated inMr. Mitchell's letter, the Department should grant the same relief here.

WHEREFORE, American Eagle moves that the schedule referenced above be withheld frompublic disclosure under Rule 12 for a period of 10 years.

March 20, 2013 Respecifully submitted,

FRANCIS C. HEIL SeniorAttorney AmericanAirlines, Inc. On behalf ofAmerican Eagle Airlines, Inc.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. RAM ON GU TI ER RE Z- PE RE Z, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 11- 50429 D. C . No . 3 : 1 1 - c r - 0 2 9 5 4 - L AB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia L a rryA . B urns , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J ul y17, 2012 ** B efo re: S C H R O E D E R , T H O M A S , an dS IL V E R M A N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. R am on G ut i erre z- P er ez appeal s f rom the 30 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for bei ng a deport ed al i en foun d i n the U ni t ed S ta te s , in v io la tio n o f

8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 . W e h a v e ju r is d ic tio n u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . 

# FI LED JU L 27 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS11- 50429 2 § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f

f i rm. G ut i e rr e z - P e r e z c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d byf a i l i ng t o: ( i ) us e the G ui de l i ne s r a nge a s as t a rt i ng poi ntf ors e nt e nc i ng a nd ke e p the G ui del i nes i n m i nd du ri ng se nt enci ng , (i i ) c on si der the 18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(a) fa ct ors othe rtha n de t e rr e nc e , a nd ( i i i ) e xpl a i n the e xt e ntof the upw a r d va r i a nc e . T he re cord bel i es these cont ent i on s. T he di stri ctcourtdet erm i ned the corre ct G ui del i nes r ange, l i st ened t o G ut i erre z- P er ez ’ s m i t i gat i ng ar gu m ent s, consi dere d th e s e c tio n 3 5 5 3 ( a ) f

a c to r s , a n ds u f

f ic ie n tlye x p la in e dth e s e n te n c e im p o s e d . See U n ite d S ta tes v . Ca r ty , 5 2 0 F .3 d9 8 4 , 9 9 1 - 9 3 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) . G u tie rr e z - P e r e z a ls o c o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e ly un re as on abl e. In l i gh tof the t ot al i ty of the ci rc um st ance s and the se ct i on 35 53 (a ) s e n te n c in g f

a c to r s , p a rtic u la r lyth e n e e df o rd e te rr e n c e , th e s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . See G al l v. U ni ted States , 55 2 U . S . 38 , 51 (200 7). AF F I RME D.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

In the Matter of 

JACQUELINE ANN SCACCIA 

PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT 

FROM RETIRED STATUS 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 52 DB 2016 (No. 47 RST 2016) 

Attorney Registration No. 84210 

(Out of State) 

O R D E R 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2016, the Report and Recommendation of 

Disciplinary Board Member dated June 10, 2016, is approved and it is ORDERED that 

Jacqueline Ann Scaccia, who has been on Retired Status, has never been suspended 

or disbarred, and has demonstrated that she has the moral qualifications, competency 

and learning in law required for admission to practice in the Commonwealth, shall be 

and is, hereby reinstated to active status as a member of the Bar of this 

Commonwealth. The expenses incurred by the Board in the investigation and 

processing of this matter shall be paid by the Petitioner.
##### 



Exhibit 12.1
 
 Six Months EndedJune 30
    
    
    Year Ended December 31,2007
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2006
    
    
    2005
    
    
    2004
    
    
    2003
    
    
    2002Income (loss) from continuing operations
before income
taxes(a)
    
    $
    664,006
    
    
    $
    557,885
    
    
    $
    1,237,729
    
    
    $
    618,231
    
    
    $
    411,946
    
    
    $
    188,632
    
    
    $
    (32,065
    )Fixed charges:Interest expense(b)
    
    
    74,725
    
    
    
    45,824
    
    
    
    109,216
    
    
    
    80,189
    
    
    
    63,467
    
    
    
    76,447
    
    
    
    85,419Capitalized Interest
    
    
    1,322
    
    
    
    1,129
    
    
    
    2,483
    
    
    
    2,072
    
    
    
    3,465
    
    
    
    3,020
    
    
    
    1,695Interest factor portion of
rentals(c)
    
    
    17,815
    
    
    
    13,371
    
    
    
    30,275
    
    
    
    23,290
    
    
    
    13,991
    
    
    
    13,581
    
    
    
    13,769Total fixed charges
    
    
    93,862
    
    
    
    60,324
    
    
    
    141,974
    
    
    
    105,551
    
    
    
    80,923
    
    
    
    93,048
    
    
    
    100,883Less: Capitalized Interest
    
    
    (1,322
    )
    
    
    (1,129
    )
    
    
    (2,483
    )
    
    
    (2,072
    )
    
    
    (3,465
    )
    
    
    (3,020
    )
    
    
    (1,695
    )Earnings before income taxes and fixed
charges
    
    $
    756,546
    
    
    $
    617,080
    
    
    $
    1,377,220
    
    
    $
    721,710
    
    
    $
    489,404
    
    
    $
    278,660
    
    
    $
    67,123Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    
    
    8.06
    
    
    
    10.23
    
    
    
    9.70
    
    
    
    6.84
    
    
    
    6.05
    
    
    
    2.99
    
    
    
    
    (d)
 
 (a)
    
    Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes has been adjusted to include
only distributed income of less-than-fifty-percent-owned persons.(b)
    
    Interest expense consists of interest expense incurred from continuing operations and
amortization of debt issuance costs.(c)
    
    Interest factor portion of rentals is estimated to be one-third of rental expense.(d)
    
    For the year ended December 31, 2002, earnings, as defined, before fixed charges were
inadequate to cover fixed charges by $33.8 million.
#### SPURLOCK v. STATE.

No. 14247.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 1, 1931.

Hood Kizziar and Olin Blanks, both of San Angelo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

The offense is robbery with firearms; penalty, confinement in the penitentiary for a period of 35 years.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented.

Neither bills of exception nor statement of facts are found- in the record. No ruling or action of the trial court is presented for review. No fundamental vice in the trial has been perceived.

The sentence is wrong in failing to give effect to the Indeterminate Sentence Law (Code Cr. Proc. 1925, art. 775). The judgment and sentence should condemn the appellant to confinement in the state penitentiary for a term ©f not less than 5, nor more than 35 years. In that particular the judgment is reformed, and, as reformed, it is affirmed.
Exhibit
31.2


Certification
of Principal Financial Officer


Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





I, Howard
Mah, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United States Heating Oil Fund,
LP;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:





(a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;





(b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





(c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s Board of
Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):





(a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





(b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.





Date:
            November
      16, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Howard MahName:
              Title:
            Howard
      Mah
              Chief
      Financial Officer
              United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
              General
      Partner of United States Heating Oil Fund,
LP
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Einat Krasney, the President and Director of Powersafe Technology
      Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
      the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                    September 18, 2007By:/s/
                    Einat KrasneyName:Einat
                  KrasneyTitle:President
                    and Director
                  (Principal
                      Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### CARTHAN v. STATE.

No. 17213.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 30, 1935.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft of property over $5 in value; punishment being assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense. The record contains neither bills of exception nor statement of facts. Nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ JERRY E. THOMPSONJerry E. ThompsonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerTEPPCO GP, Inc., Sole Manager
# DENTONS June 4, 2015
Pat ri ck Doll Manag

i ng Assoc

i ate United States of America Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Washington, DC

pa t rick doU@dentons com D +1 214 259
1 8 89 De n tons U S LL P 20 0 0 McKi n ney Avenue Su

i t e 1900 Oanas TX 75201

- 1858 USA T +1 21 4 259 0900 F + 1 21 4 259 09 10 Satans FMC SNR Denton dentons

, com 

### Re
: In 

### the Matter of the Petition for Exemption of Winn Fuqua Photography, Inc
. for a Summary Grant Exemption Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 Dear Sir or Madam: I am writing pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to request that Winn Fuqua Photography, Inc. ("Fuqua

" ) , an owner and operator of small unmanned aircraft, 

### be e x empted from the Federal Aviation Regulations ("FARs

" ) listed in the attached petition

. This exemption will allow Fuqua to employ its small unmanned aircraft systems

(

" sUASs

" ) to conduct commercial aerial photography and videography

in pre-planned, controlled areas

. As described herein, Fuqua is a professional photography and videography company working with a range of industr

i es ranging from advertising, public relations, residential/commercial realty

, construction

, industrial applications, and the agricultural community. Fuqua has been in business for over 25 years

, and the owner of Winn Fuqua Photography

, Inc

. , Winn Fuqua

, has over five years of recreational/hobby experience
in remote control vehicles. Sincerely

, 

# "-llti?c} 

# &eP. Patrick Doll Attachment
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3345 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3345

To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act for purposes of making 
claims under such Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing, 
                        and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2015

 Mr. Gosar (for himself, Mrs. Kirkpatrick, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. 
   Amodei, and Ms. Sinema) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined 
 by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as 
        fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act for purposes of making 
claims under such Act based on exposure to atmospheric nuclear testing, 
                        and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Downwinders Compensation Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. INCLUSION UNDER THE RADIATION EXPOSURE COMPENSATION ACT.

    Section 4(b)(1) of the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act (42 
U.S.C. 2210 note; Public Law 101-426) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B)--
                    (A) by striking ``that portion of''; and
                    (B) by striking ``that consists of townships 13 
                through 16 at ranges 63 through 71''; and
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by inserting ``all acreage in any 
        county all or part of which is located in'' before ``that 
        part''.

SEC. 3. DENIAL OF CHARITABLE DEDUCTION FOR CONTRIBUTIONS THAT HAVE A 
              PREREQUISITE FOR PURCHASING TICKETS TO A COLLEGE SPORTING 
              EVENT.

    (a) In General.--Section 170(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(1) Contributions that have a prerequisite for purchasing 
        tickets to a college sporting event.--No deduction shall be 
        allowed under subsection (a) for any contribution that has a 
        prerequisite for purchasing tickets to a college sporting 
        event.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to contributions made after the date of the enactment of this Act 
in taxable years ending after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```