alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.1



Certification



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Pursuant to U.S.C. Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of
Amira Nature Foods Ltd (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March
31, 2017 of the Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
information contained in the Annual Report on Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|              | AMIRA NATURE FOODS LTD
|------------- | ----------------------
|              |                       
|July 29, 2017 | By:                   
|              |                       
|              |                       
|              |                       
|              |                       
|July 29, 2017 | By:                   
|              |                       
|              |                       
|              |
#### HARDY v. STATE.

No. 18158.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1936.

S. F. Rose, of Amarillo, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for aiding prisoner to escape; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.

A plea of guilty was duly and legally entered in this case, upon which a judgment was based so decreeing, of date September 11, 1935, in which the punishment of appellant was fixed at three years in the penitentiary. No motion for new trial w¿s filed, but, when sentence was imposed on September 20, 1935, the prison term of this appellant was made cumulative of one imposed in another case against appellant triedl at the same term. Thereupon appellant made a motion.in arrest of,judgment, setting up that he had been induced to enter his plea of guilty by his attorney, who had! advised him that, if he would so plead guilty,, the district attorney would recommend to the court that appellant’s sentence herein run concurrently with that imposed in the other casé referred to. If this be treated as a motion in arrest of judgment, which our statute seems to contemplate should only attack matters of the indictment, the trial! judge might have -declined to consider the-motion because filed too late. See Lewis v. State, 50 Tex.Cr.R. 331, 97 S.W. 481; Reno v. State, 56 Tex.Cr.R. 242, 120 S.W. 430;. Burnett v. State, 88 Tex.Cr.R. 598, 228 S.*426W. 239. However, we observe that the trial judge gave appellant a hearing on the motion, and upon the facts adduced overruled same. We have examined the testimony heard by the court upon this motion, and think his action well supported. We learn from same that the district attorney did in fact recommend to the trial judge that the sentences,. above referred to, be made to run concurrently, but the trial judge declined to follow such recommendation, as he "had a perfect right to do. We are not impressed with the fact that appellant’s claim has any merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
|   | (1)(2) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; andThe      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | August      13, 2008 |
|--------|----------------------|

|   |   |                                                                      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   |   | /s/      Robert P. Mundy                                                  |
|   |   | Robert      P. MundySenior      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

THE RECREATION AND PARK NO. 2023 CW 0220

COMMISSION FOR THE PARISH OF

EAST BATON ROUGE

VERSUS

SID J. GAUTREAUX, III, IN

HIS CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF

EAST BATON ROUGE PARISH

JUNE 20, 2023

In Re: Sheriff Sid J. Gautreaux, IIi, in his capacity as

Sheriff of East Baton Rouge Parish and as Ex Officio

Collector of East Baton Rouge Parish Ad Valorem Taxes, 

applying for supervisory writs, 19th Judicial District

Court, Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 725439. 

BEFORE: GUIDRYI C. J., MCCLENDON AND WELCH, JJ. 

WRIT GRANTED WITH ORDER. The trial court' s February 6, 

2023 judgment denying the motion to recuse Judge Johnson filed

by Sid J. Gautreaux, III, In His Capacity As Sheriff Of East

Baton Rouge Parish ( Sheriff) is vacated. Pursuant to La. Code

Civ. P. art. 154( B), if a motion to recuse sets forth a ground

for recusal under Article 151, the judge shall either recuse

himself or make a written request to the Louisiana Supreme Court

for the appointment of an ad hoc judge. The Sheriff' s motion

set forth grounds of recusal under La. Cade Civ. P. art. 151( B), 

asserting a substantial and objective basis for recusal based on

Judge Johnson' s previous service as a board member on the

defendant' s board. This matter is remanded to the trial court

with instructions to make a written request to the Louisiana

Supreme Court pursuant to La. Code Civ. P. art. 154( B) for the

appointment of an ad hoc judge to hear the motion to recuse. 

JMG

PMC

JEW

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

LJ

N/)

i' 

D U Y CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 Form 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report March 30, 2007
 Friedman Industries, Incorporated
  Texas
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-7521
(Commission File Number)
    
    74-1504405
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 4001 Homestead Road 
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77028-5585
(Zip Code)
 713-672-9433
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02.
    
    Departure of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment
of Principal Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
   FRIEDMAN INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATEDBy:
    /s/ BEN HARPERBen HarperSenior Vice President-Finance
and Secretary/Treasurer
June 24, 2015

Mr. Michael Hull Above Orange County

21580 Yorba Linda Boulevard Yorba Linda, CA 92887

Dear Mr. Hull:

This letter is to inform you that we are unabl e to process your request for an exemption from part 21 Subpart H, part 27, and §§ 45.23(b), 45.27(a), 61.113(a) and (b ), 61.133(a), 91. 7(a), 91.9(b)(2), 91.103, 91.1 09(a), 91.119, 91.121, 91.151 (a), 91.203(a) and (b), 91.319(a)(1 ), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1 ), 91.409(a)(2 ), 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It expl ains why we cannot process yo ur request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your April 8, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Above Or ange County into the public docket (No. FAA

− 2015

− 1063), but we are unable to proce ss your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any furthe r, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adve rsely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equa l to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or ar guments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any fu rther, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requi res you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days , we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additiona l time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
EXHIBIT 35.1





ANNUAL SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
OF THE SERVICING PARTY

FOR THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2019





The undersigned, duly authorized officers of Royal Bank of Canada,
as Servicer and Cash Manager under the Servicing Agreement and Cash Management Agreement, respectively, do hereby certify that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities of the Servicer and Cash Manager
during the period from November 1, 2018 through October 31, 2019, and of its performance under the Servicing Agreement and Cash
Management Agreement was conducted under my supervision.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
        and Cash Manager have fulfilled all of their obligations under the Servicing Agreement and Cash Management Agreement, respectively,
        in all material respects throughout such period.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have duly executed this
Certificate on behalf of the Servicer this 29th day of January, 2020.





| | By: | /s/ James Salem                        | 
| | --- | -------------------------------------- | 
| |     | James Salem                            | 
| |     | Executive Vice-President and Treasurer | 
| |     |                                        | 
| |     |                                        | 
| | By: | /s/ Elizabeth Herrema                  | 
| |     | Elizabeth Herrema                      | 
| |     | Vice-President, Home Equity
Financing  |
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DJO Finance LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 2009 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, LeslieH. Cross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                                     The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                  The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  July 31, 2009                        |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |   |
| /s/  LESLIE H. CROSS                             |   |
| Leslie  H. Cross                                 |   |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |

 

----
09-102attachment6.doc Page 1 of 2 

ATTACHMENT 6 

Employee Death Case Summary 

Employee Name: SSN: 

Date of Birth: 

Date of Death: 

Specialist Name: HR Region: 

Action Item Date 

1 Date notified of death 

2 Date specialist contacted survivor 

3 Date OPF requested 

4 Date OPF received 

5 Date reviewed for possible benefit elections and beneficiary forms not filed in the OPF 

6 Date Quick Pay completed (if survivor annuity): http://apps.opm.gov/deathinservice/index.cfm

7 

Date package sent to spouse/beneficiary/next of kin 

 Condolence letter 

 Summary of Benefits 

 Survivor annuity estimate, if spouse 

 FE-6, Claim for Death Benefits, if enrolled in FEGLI 

 SF 1153, Claim for Unpaid Compensation

o Election Regarding Method of Payment for Unpaid Compensation, if applicable

 SF 2800, CSRS Application for Death Benefits

o SF 2800-1 Applying for Death Benefits Under the CSRS

o SF 2800A, Section 2 - Survivor’s Military Service Election

 SF 3104, FERS Application of Death Benefits

o SF 3114, Applying for Death Benefits Under the FERS

o SF 3104B, Section 2 - Basic Employee Death Benefit

o SF 3104B, Section 3 - Health Benefits Election

o SF 3104B, Section 4 - Survivor’s Military Service Election 

o SF 3104B, Section 5 - Death Benefit Payment Rollover Election Form

 Military Deposit Information, if military service 

o Date RI 20-97 sent to Payroll for post-56 earnings, if required ________________ 

o Date RI 25-45 sent to Payroll, if retired military_____________ 

 RI 25-41, Initial Certification of Full-time School Attendance, if children between 18-22 

 TSP-17, Information Relating to Deceased Participant, if TSP benefits 

 TSP-583, Important Tax Information About Thrift Savings Plan Death Benefit Payments







8 

Date forms sent to OFEGLI 

 SF 2817s (SF 76 and SF 76T), Election of Life Insurance

 SF 2821, Agency Certification of Insurance Status

 SF 2823, Designations of Beneficiary

 Death Certificate 






09-102attachment6.doc Page 2 of 2 

9 

Date forms sent to OPM via Payroll 

 SF 2800A, Section 1 or SF 3104B Section 1, Certified Summary of Federal Service

 SF 2800A, Section 3 or SF 3104B Section 6, Agency Information and Certification

 SF 3102, Designation of Beneficiary (if FERS) 

 All SF 2809s and SF 2810s (if enrolled in FEHB) 

 SF 50, Notification of Personnel Action 

 Death certificate 







10 

Date SF 1153 and if applicable, Election Regarding Payment for Unpaid Compensation Received 

from Survivor 

11 

Date forms sent to Payroll 

 SF 1153, Claim for Unpaid Compensation

 Election Regarding the Payment of Unpaid Compensation (if applicable)

 SF 1152, Designation of Beneficiary or Statement Regarding Beneficiary

 Death Certificate 







Comments: 

Benefits Specialist: 

Date:
.. 

Washington State Senate 

Olymp ia Ad dress: 

PO Box -10442 

Olympia, WA 9850'1-0;;2 

May 28,2014 

Senator Doug Ericksen 

42nd Legislative District 

Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator 

U.S. EPA Region 10 

1200 Sixth Avenue, Suite 900 

Seattle, W A 98 1 0 I 

Dear Regional Administrator McLerran, 

~ 

(360) 786-7682 

FAX: (360) 786-1323 

E-mail: Doug.Ericksen@leg.wa.gm· 

RECEIVED ON: 

f JUN 0 2 2014 

EPA Region 10 

Office of the Regional Administrator 

Thank you for responding to my April 3 letter regarding the ongoing process to adopt human health 

criteria into Washington's water quality standards. Unfortunately, your response highlights one of 

the great shortcomings of current government. I asked a specific question relating to a very 

important issue that will affect Washington's economy and public health, but you did not provide me 

with a specific answer. Here is an excerpt from my letter: 

I respectfully seek a response from yo ur agency that outlines the review process that the state's 

proposed criteria will undergo, and I specifically wo uld like to know what your agency considers to 

be an appropriate cancer risk level for Washington. I also seek your input as to the state's options for 

setting a cancer risk level- i.e. whether the criteria may be based on a risk level chosen from a 

generally acceptable range, whether EPA expects Washington to adopt a risk level of I 0-6, or 

whether other options are available. 

I am taking this opportunity to rephrase my inquiry for the sake of clarity. Please answer the 

fo llowing questions: 

(I) Have you or your staff indicated to the Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) that 

there is a threshold cancer risk level that must be proposed for the state's criteria to receive 

approval? 

(2) Have you or your staff indicated to Ecology that a cancer risk level of I 0-6 is required or that 

it is the level you want the state to propose? 

(3) Have you or your staff provided any specific directives to Ecology outlining what you will 

accept for a cancer risk level for Washington? 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to your prompt response. 

Sincerely, 

D~ ?~--- ~~':n. Chair 

Senate Energy, Environment 

and Telecommunications Committee 

C, Necycled 
' 

,· 

.. •

• 

" 

. _,_
EX-31Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

I, Nicholas Galeone, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period coveredby this report on Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C2 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-Dfor the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this reportunder Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled theirobligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.  All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestationreports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this reportin accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to thisreport, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have beendisclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

Ingiving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

WellsFargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association,as Trustee prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association, as Trustee on and after October 17, 2022,U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator prior to October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association,as Certificate Administrator on and after October 17, 2022, U.S. Bank National Association, as Custodian, Pentalpha SurveillanceLLC, as Operating Advisor, and CoreLogic Solutions, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

 

Dated:March 20, 2023

 

/s/Nicholas Galeone

 

President

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EX-35.5
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334


ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated
as of August 1, 2012, by and among Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities
Inc., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer,
Certificate Administrator, Tax Administrator and Custodian, Rialto Capital
Advisors, LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance, LLC, as Trust
Advisor and Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas, as Trustee, with respect to
Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates WFRBS 2012-C8 (the "Agreement").
Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings
assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.12 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1,
   2013 through December 31, 2013,  and of its performance per the Agreement
   during such period has been made under my supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the period January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th
day of March 2014.


/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far