alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### IRLBECK et al. v. STATE.

No. 2084—6900.

Commission of Appeals of Texas, Section A.

June 16, 1937.

M. J. Baird, of Mission, for plaintiffs in error.

Meade F. Griffin, of Plainview, and J. H. O’Neall, of Tulia, for the State.

GERMAN, Commissioner.

This suit was originally instituted by the State of Texas against Ludwig Irlbeck and others, plaintiffs in error here, to have certain premises declared a nuisance, and for an injunction. Upon hearing, «the district court declared a nuisance existed and enjoined the defendants in the operation and maintenance of same. This judgment was entered on October 5,1934. Motion for new trial was overruled on October 13, 1934, and defendants gave notice of appeal, and timely filed appeal bond. They delayed, however, more than the statutory period allowed for filing the transcript and statement of facts in the Court of Civil Appeals, and for that reason attempted to abandon the appeal and to prosecute a writ of error. On motion the judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals on certificate.

At the time application for writ of error was granted there was some apparent conflict in the decisions. The Supreme Court, however, has in the recent case of Jarrell v. Farmers’ & Merchants’ State Bond Bank, 99 S.W.(2d) 281, definitely settled that, when an appellant, after giving notice of appeal and filing appeal bond, fails to timely file transcript in the Court of Civil Appeals and abandons such proceeding, .then attempts to prosecute appeal by writ of error, the Court of Civil Appeals shall, upon motion seasonably filed, affirm upon certificate, and dismiss writ of error. That decision disposes of the present case, and the judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
Exhibit 31.1


I, Christine M. Day, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of lululemon athletica inc.; and


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.





By:/S/    CHRISTINEM. DAYChristine M. DayChief Executive Officer and Director(Principal Executive Officer)





Date: January 7, 2014
COLONIAL REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                 EXHIBIT 12 - Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

         CRLP's  ratio of earnings to fixed  charges for the three  months ended
June  30,  2001 and  2000,  was 1.59 and  1.68,  respectively.  CRLP's  ratio of
earnings to fixed  charges for the six months ended June 30, 2001 and 2000,  was
1.56 and 1.66, respectively.

         The ratios of  earnings  to fixed  charges  were  computed  by dividing
earnings by fixed charges.  For this purpose,  earnings consist of income (loss)
before gains from sales of property and  extraordinary  items plus fixed charges
(excluding  interest  costs  capitalized).  Fixed  charges  consist of  interest
expense  (including  interest costs  capitalized)  and the  amortization of debt
issuance costs.
##### 



Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 In connection with filing the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006
(the Report) by Champion Communication Services, Inc. (Registrant), each of the undersigned
hereby certifies that:1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Registrant.
 /s/ Albert F. Richmond
 /s/ Pamela R. Cooper
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
April 27, 2007
 STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
Incorporation)
    
    000-50132
(Commission File No.)
    
    76-0502785
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 333 Clay Street, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal execute offices)
    
    77002-4109
(Zip Code)
 (713) 650-3700
 Not Applicable
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain OfficersItem 7.01. Regulation FD DisclosureSIGNATURE    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02. Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers
 Certificate of
Incorporation Sterling Notes
  
 Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure
 1 4




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  Date:  April 27, 2007
    STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.By:
    /s/ Richard K. CrumpRichard K. CrumpPresident and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of RINO
      International Corporation (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
                September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section
                13(a)
                or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Dated:
                November 11, 2008/s/
                Zou DejinZou
                DejunChief
                Executive Officer/Qiu
                JianpingQiu
                JianpingChief
                Financial Officer





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      RINO International Corporation and will be retained by RINO International
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
Exhibit





Exhibit 10.1





[Quantum Letterhead]




November 8, 2017


Mr. Eric Singer


Dear Eric:


We are pleased to offer you the opportunity to serve on the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Quantum Corporation (“Quantum”), effective upon your acceptance of this offer letter.


As a Member of the Board of Directors, and under the current Board compensation program, your Board retainer will be $50,000 per annum, all of which will be paid in cash. Your committee membership and committee retainer will be determined following your appointment.  The retainers are generally paid in quarterly installments.  Quantum will also reimburse you for any reasonable travel or incidental expenses associated with performing your duties as a Board member. 


We will recommend to the Leadership and Compensation Committee that restricted stock units (RSUs) with a total value of $93,750 be awarded to you. This amount represents 75% of the Board’s annual RSU grant amount of $125,000, which is the pro rata calculation based on 9 months of remaining Board service until the next annual stockholder meeting, anticipated to occur in August 2018. The number of RSUs to be awarded will be determined based on the Company’s closing stock price on the date of the Leadership and Compensation Committee’s approval, which occurs on the first business day of every month.  Therefore, the number of RSUs to be awarded to you will be determined using the closing stock price on December 1, 2017.  These RSUs will vest 100% in full on the earlier to occur of: i) the date of the 2018 annual stockholder meeting; and ii) September 1, 2018.  Once the RSUs have been approved, you will receive documentation from E*Trade, Quantum’s Stock Administrator, within two (2) months from your start date.  


Lastly, we are pleased to offer you the opportunity to participate in Quantum’s Deferred Compensation Program.  If you are interested in further information about this program, please let us know and we will forward it to you.


To confirm your acceptance of our offer, please sign one copy of this letter, complete the enclosed documents, and return them to Shawn Hall via email at shawn.hall@quantum.com or by mail to: Shawn Hall, Quantum Corporation, 224 Airport Parkway, Suite 550, San Jose, CA 95110.  


Please contact me if you have any questions. Welcome to Quantum and I look forward to working with you. 






Sincerely,


/s/ Raghu Rau
Raghu Rau        
Chairman    
Quantum Corporation    


            


I understand and accept the terms of this agreement and agree to comply with all Quantum and Board policies and procedures, including those described in Quantum’s Business Conduct and Ethic’s Policy, Section 16 Policy, Insider Trading Policy, and Corporate Governance Principles.




Signed: ___/s/ Eric Singer________________________________    Date: _11/9/17______________
Eric Singer




Enclosures:
The High Road: Quantum’s Business Conduct & Ethics Policy








Exhibit 10.1





Section 16 Policy Documentation
Insider Trading Policy
Corporate Governance Principles








cc:     Compensation
Legal
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60384 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus HAROLD W. ROBERTS, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:00-CR-14-ALL-LN

-------------------- August 14, 2002 Before JONES, SMITH, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Harold W. Roberts, Jr., pleaded guilty to one count of possession of less than 50 kilograms of marijuana with intent to distribute, and the district court sentenced him to 120 months in prison and a five-year term of supervised release. Roberts first argues that his plea was rendered involuntary by his attorney’s failure to file a motion to suppress, and he contends that theNo. 01-60384 -2- district court abused its discretion by denying his F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32(e) motion to withdraw his plea. Roberts has not shown a “fair and just reason” why he should be allowed to withdraw his plea. F ED . R. C RIM . P. 32(e). Rather, he argues that counsel should have filed a motion to suppress, and he speculatively asserts that the charges against him would have been dismissed had counsel done so. Rule 32 was not meant “to allow a defendant to make a tactical decision to enter a plea, wait several weeks, and then obtain a withdrawal if he believes that he made a bad choice in pleading guilty.” United
States v. Carr , 740 F.2d 339, 345 (5th Cir. 1984). Roberts has not carried his burden of showing that the district court abused its discretion in denying his motion to withdraw his plea. See United States v. Brewster , 137 F.3d 853, 857-58 (5th Cir. 1998). Roberts also contends that counsel rendered ineffective assistance by not filing a motion to suppress. As a general rule, this court declines to review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel on direct appeal. United States v. Gibson , 55 F.3d 173, 179 (5th Cir. 1995). Roberts has not shown that his case presents an exception to this general rule. Accordingly, we decline to consider his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
#### YOTHER v. STATE.

No. 16626.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1934.

T. B. Sisco, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the 'Offense of transporting intoxicating liquor, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure lias been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed;

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
December 16, 2005 

Dear Coventry Health Care Members, 

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, many Coventry Health Care of Louisiana 

(CHC-LA) members enrolled under the Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) 

Program temporarily relocated outside of the CHC-LA service area. CHC-LA responded 

by allowing members to receive their in-network benefits through access of the CHC-LA 

national provider network, First Health (FH). These in-network benefits will continue 

until January 8th, 2006. 

CHC-LA in conjunction with the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) has decided to 

extend this special benefit arrangement from December 1, 2005 through January 1, 2006 

for federal annuitants and through January 8, 2006 for active federal employees. 

Beyond these dates, only emergency services will be covered outside of the area. If your 

situation prohibits you from returning to the area, you must make a new health plan 

election through your personnel office. 

To reiterate, if you are enrolled in CHC-LA codes BJ1 and BJ2 and require medical care 

before January 1st (annuitants) or January 8th (active employees), services must be 

rendered by the local CHC-LA network or a provider in the national FH network. For 

more information, please contact our Customer Service Organization at 1-800-341-6613 

or view the FH and CHC-LA provider listings located on our website at www.chcla.com. 

CHC-LA made many policy decisions Post-Katrina to remove barriers to the treatment 

and payment of services for our members. We are appreciative for the opportunity to 

serve OPM members into ’06 and beyond and feel this decision demonstrates that 

CHC-LA is committed to delivering the highest levels of service to meet the needs of 

federal OPM employees. 

Sincerely, 

Coventry Health Care of Louisiana, Inc.
# C_2022167EN.01003201.xml

| 21.4.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 167/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.4.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 167/32

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.10634 – CVC / GAMING1)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 167/07)

1.

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| — | CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS S.A (‘CVC’, Luxembourg), |
| --- | --- |

—

CVC Capital Partners SICAV-FIS S.A (‘CVC’, Luxembourg),

| — | Certain entities belonging to the Gaming1 Group (the ‘Target’, Belgium). |
| --- | --- |

—

Certain entities belonging to the Gaming1 Group (the ‘Target’, Belgium).

CVC will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Merger Regulation control of the whole of the Target.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

| — | CVC: Private equity fund providing investment advice to and managing investments on behalf of investment funds. CVC holds interests in companies in various industries, including chemicals, utilities, manufacturing, retailing and distribution. |
| --- | --- |

—

CVC: Private equity fund providing investment advice to and managing investments on behalf of investment funds. CVC holds interests in companies in various industries, including chemicals, utilities, manufacturing, retailing and distribution.

| — | The Target: owns land-based casinos, gaming halls and betting agencies in Belgium, France and Switzerland, and is active in the operation of online gambling websites (casinos and sports betting) and mobile applications in Belgium, Malta, Portugal, France, Switzerland, Spain, Serbia, Colombia and the US. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Target: owns land-based casinos, gaming halls and betting agencies in Belgium, France and Switzerland, and is active in the operation of online gambling websites (casinos and sports betting) and mobile applications in Belgium, Malta, Portugal, France, Switzerland, Spain, Serbia, Colombia and the US.

3.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

4.

Observations must reach the Commission not later than 10 days following the date of this publication. The following reference should always be specified:

M.10634 – CVC / GAMING1

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email, by fax, or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Fax +32 22964301

Postal address:

| European Commission |
| --- |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

European Commission

Directorate-General for Competition

Merger Registry

1049 Bruxelles/Brussel

BELGIQUE/BELGIË

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

1

---
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of - )

)

Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland ) ASBCA No. 63111

)

Under Contract No. W912ER-11-D-0010 )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Robert C. Niesley, Esq.

Rebecca S. Glos, Esq.

 Watt, Tieder, Hoffar & Fitzgerald, L.L.P

 Irvine, CA

 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Rebecca L. Bockmann, Esq.

Michael E. Taccino, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Middle East

 Winchester, VA

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: July 6, 2023

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 63111, Appeal of Fidelity and 

Deposit Company of Maryland, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: July 6, 2023

TIMOTHY P. MCILMAIL

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 1789

_____________________________ R ICKY G LEN R USHING , Petitioner ,

v.
S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Second Amended Petition for Wri t of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

August 22, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. D ENIED

. R OBERTS , K ELSEY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Henry Mark Sims, Public Defender, and Brian L. Hill, Assistant Public Defender, Port St. Joe , for Petitioner

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
Exactly how Easy is 

saving monEy with an fsa? 

That’s right...it’s as easy as pie! Get the Fed-friendly tax break on your health 

care and dependent care expenses. Enroll in FSAFEDS during Open Season, 

November 12 to December 10, 2012 at www.FSAFEDS.com. 

PUt moRE monEy in yoUR PocKEt! 

1-877-FSAFEDS (372-3337) | TTY: 1-800-952-0450
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 17

- 1689

_____________________________
D ANIEL C ARROLL L E V ASSEUR , Appellant,

v.

C ASSIE L YNN L E V ASSEUR , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Bradford County

. Stanley H. Griffis, III , Judge

. April 18, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. See Frost v. Frost , 227 So. 3d 227, 227 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) (“This court has consistently held that absent fundamental error, we will not address legal issues not presented to the trial court.”).

R OWE , R AY , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Daniel Carroll LeVasseur, pro se, Appellant.

No appearance for Appellee.
# Official Journal L 14/2007

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 14 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5020 January 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 14

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5020 January 2007

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 45/2007 of 19 January 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 46/2007 of 19 January 2007 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences lodged 16 January 2007 under the Community tariff quota for manioc starch opened by Regulation (EC) No 2402/96 | 3 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2007 of 19 January 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 34/2007 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for bananas originating in the ACP countries for the period to 31 December 2007 | 4 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 45/2007 of 19 January 2007 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 46/2007 of 19 January 2007 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences lodged 16 January 2007 under the Community tariff quota for manioc starch opened by Regulation (EC) No 2402/96

3

Commission Regulation (EC) No 47/2007 of 19 January 2007 amending Regulation (EC) No 34/2007 fixing the allocation coefficient to be applied to applications for import licences for bananas originating in the ACP countries for the period to 31 December 2007

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.