Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 28135 

AIRAC date State City Airport FDC No. FDC date Subject 

5/30/13 ......... MD Baltimore .......................... Baltimore/Washington Intl 

Thurgood Marshall.

3/0860 4/17/13 RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 10, Amdt 2. 

5/30/13 ......... NC Mount Olive ...................... Mount Olive Muni ............. 3/1235 4/17/13 VOR A, Amdt 2. 

5/30/13 ......... PA Pittsburgh ......................... Pittsburgh Intl ................... 3/1250 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 3A. 

5/30/13 ......... PA Pittsburgh ......................... Pittsburgh Intl ................... 3/1285 4/17/13 RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 28R, OrigB. 

5/30/13 ......... TN Athens .............................. McMinn County ................ 3/1337 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1. 

5/30/13 ......... ID Lewiston ........................... Lewiston-Nez Perce 

County.

3/1615 4/17/13 ILS RWY 26, Amdt 13A. 

5/30/13 ......... IA Davenport ......................... Davenport Muni ................ 3/1621 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Amdt 1A. 

5/30/13 ......... IA Davenport ......................... Davenport Muni ................ 3/1622 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1A. 

5/30/13 ......... IA Davenport ......................... Davenport Muni ................ 3/1629 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Amdt 1B. 

5/30/13 ......... IA Davenport ......................... Davenport Muni ................ 3/1630 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 2. 

5/30/13 ......... IA Davenport ......................... Davenport Muni ................ 3/1634 4/17/13 ILS OR LOC RWY 15, Amdt 1. 

5/30/13 ......... IA Davenport ......................... Davenport Muni ................ 3/1640 4/17/13 VOR RWY 21, Amdt 8. 

5/30/13 ......... IA Davenport ......................... Davenport Muni ................ 3/2468 4/17/13 VOR RWY 3, Amdt 9. 

5/30/13 ......... PA Mount Pocono .................. Pocono Mountains Muni .. 3/5791 4/19/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 2. 

5/30/13 ......... WI Fort Atkinson .................... Fort Atkinson Muni ........... 3/9771 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Orig. 

5/30/13 ......... WI Fort Atkinson .................... Fort Atkinson Muni ........... 3/9773 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Orig. 

5/30/13 ......... WI Fort Atkinson .................... Fort Atkinson Muni ........... 3/9777 4/17/13 VOR A, Orig-B. 

5/30/13 ......... WI West Bend ....................... West Bend Muni .............. 3/9883 4/17/13 LOC RWY 31, Orig-B. 

5/30/13 ......... WI West Bend ....................... West Bend Muni .............. 3/9884 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Orig. 

5/30/13 ......... WI West Bend ....................... West Bend Muni .............. 3/9885 4/17/13 VOR RWY 13, Amdt 5A. 

5/30/13 ......... WI West Bend ....................... West Bend Muni .............. 3/9886 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Orig. 

5/30/13 ......... WI West Bend ....................... West Bend Muni .............. 3/9888 4/17/13 VOR RWY 24, Amdt 3A. 

5/30/13 ......... PA Mount Pocono .................. Pocono Mountains Muni .. 3/9934 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 3. 

5/30/13 ......... PA Mount Pocono .................. Pocono Mountains Muni .. 3/9935 4/17/13 RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig. 

[FR Doc. 2013–11325 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 97 

[Docket No. 30898; Amdt. No. 3533] 

Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums 

and Obstacle Departure Procedures; 

Miscellaneous Amendments 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, 

suspends, or revokes Standard 

Instrument Approach Procedures 

(SIAPs) and associated Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle Departure 

Procedures for operations at certain 

airports. These regulatory actions are 

needed because of the adoption of new 

or revised criteria, or because of changes 

occurring in the National Airspace 

System, such as the commissioning of 

new navigational facilities, adding new 

obstacles, or changing air traffic 

requirements. These changes are 

designed to provide safe and efficient 

use of the navigable airspace and to 

promote safe flight operations under 

instrument flight rules at the affected 

airports. 

DATES: This rule is effective May 14, 

2013. The compliance date for each 

SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, 

and ODP is specified in the amendatory 

provisions. 

The incorporation by reference of 

certain publications listed in the 

regulations is approved by the Director 

of the Federal Register as of May 14, 

2013. 

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters 

incorporated by reference in the 

amendment is as follows: 

For Examination— 

1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA 

Headquarters Building, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; 

2. The FAA Regional Office of the 

region in which the affected airport is 

located; 

3. The National Flight Procedures 

Office, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., 

Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or, 

4. The National Archives and Records 

Administration (NARA). For 

information on the availability of this 

material at NARA, call 202–741–6030, 

or go to: http://www.archives.gov/ 

federal_register/ 

code_of_federal_regulations/ 

ibr_locations.html. 

Availability—All SIAPs and Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPs are available 

online free of charge. Visit http:// 

www.nfdc.faa.gov to register. 

Additionally, individual SIAP and 

Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may 

be obtained from: 

1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA– 

200), FAA Headquarters Building, 800 

Independence Avenue SW., 

Washington, DC 20591; or 

2. The FAA Regional Office of the 

region in which the affected airport is 

located. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Richard A. Dunham III, Flight Procedure 

Standards Branch (AFS–420), Flight 

Technologies and Programs Divisions, 

Flight Standards Service, Federal 

Aviation Administration, Mike 

Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 

South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, 

OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 

25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125) 

Telephone: (405) 954–4164. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule 

amends Title 14 of the Code of Federal 

Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by 

establishing, amending, suspending, or 

revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums 

and/or ODPS. The complete regulators 

description of each SIAP and its 

associated Takeoff Minimums or ODP 

for an identified airport is listed on FAA 

form documents which are incorporated 

by reference in this amendment under 5 

U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 

CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA 

Forms are FAA Forms 8260–3, 8260–4, 

8260–5, 8260–15A, and 8260–15B when 

required by an entry on 8260–15A. 

The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPs, in addition to 

their complex nature and the need for 

a special format make publication in the 

Federal Register expensive and 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
28136 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 

impractical. Furthermore, airmen do not 

use the regulatory text of the SIAPs, 

Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead 

refer to their depiction on charts printed 

by publishers of aeronautical materials. 

The advantages of incorporation by 

reference are realized and publication of 

the complete description of each SIAP, 

Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on 

FAA forms is unnecessary. This 

amendment provides the affected CFR 

sections and specifies the types of SIAPs 

and the effective dates of the, associated 

Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This 

amendment also identifies the airport 

and its location, the procedure, and the 

amendment number. 

The Rule 

This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is 

effective upon publication of each 

separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and 

ODP as contained in the transmittal. 

Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and 

textual ODP amendments may have 

been issued previously by the FAA in a 

Flight Data Center (FDC) Notice to 

Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency 

action of immediate flight safety relating 

directly to published aeronautical 

charts. The circumstances which 

created the need for some SIAP and 

Takeoff Minimums and ODP 

amendments may require making them 

effective in less than 30 days. For the 

remaining SIAPS and Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPS, an effective date 

at least 30 days after publication is 

provided. 

Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPS contained in this 

amendment are based on the criteria 

contained in the U.S. Standard for 

Terminal Instrument Procedures 

(TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and 

Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the 

TERPS criteria were applied to the 

conditions existing or anticipated at the 

affected airports. Because of the close 

and immediate relationship between 

these SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and 

ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find 

that notice and public procedures before 

adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff 

Minimums and ODPs are impracticable 

and contrary to the public interest and, 

where applicable, that good cause exists 

for making some SIAPs effective in less 

than 30 days. 

Conclusion 

The FAA has determined that this 

regulation only involves an established 

body of technical regulations for which 

frequent and routine amendments are 

necessary to keep them operationally 

current. It, therefore—(1) is not a 

‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under 

Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a 

‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT 

Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 

FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) 

does not warrant preparation of a 

regulatory evaluation as the anticipated 

impact is so minimal. For the same 

reason, the FAA certifies that this 

amendment will not have a significant 

economic impact on a substantial 

number of small entities under the 

criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97 

Air Traffic Control, Airports, 

Incorporation by reference, and 

Navigation (Air). 

Issued in Washington, DC, on April 26, 

2013. 

John M. Allen, 

Director, Flight Standards Service. 

Adoption of the Amendment 

Accordingly, pursuant to the 

authority delegated to me, Title 14, 

Code of Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 

CFR part 97) is amended by 

establishing, amending, suspending, or 

revoking Standard Instrument Approach 

Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums 

and/or Obstacle Departure Procedures 

effective at 0902 UTC on the dates 

specified, as follows: 

PART 97—STANDARD INSTRUMENT 

APPROACH PROCEDURES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 97 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 

40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 

44719, 44721–44722. 

■ 2. Part 97 is amended to read as 

follows: 

* * * Effective 30 MAY 2013 

Orlando, FL, Orlando Sanford Intl, ILS OR 

LOC RWY 9L, Amdt 4 

Orlando, FL, Orlando Sanford Intl, ILS OR 

LOC RWY 9R, Amdt 1 

Orlando, FL, Orlando Sanford Intl, ILS OR 

LOC RWY 27R, Amdt 3 

Orlando, FL, Orlando Sanford Intl, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 9L, Amdt 3 

Orlando, FL, Orlando Sanford Intl, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 9R, Amdt 1 

Orlando, FL, Orlando Sanford Intl, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 27R, Amdt 3 

Sebring, FL, Sebring Rgnl, RNAV (RNP) RWY 

19, Amdt 1 

Zephyrhills, FL, Zephyrhills Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 4, Orig-B 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 8R, Amdt 1 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 9L, Amdt 1 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 9R, Amdt 1 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 10, Amdt 2 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 26L, Amdt 1 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 26R, Amdt 1 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 27L, Amdt 2 

Atlanta, GA, Hartsfield—Jackson Atlanta Intl, 

RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 27R, Amdt 1 

Camilla, GA, Camilla-Mitchell County, 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1A 

Chicago/West Chicago, IL, Dupage, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 10, Orig-B 

Chicago/West Chicago, IL, Dupage, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 20L, Orig-A 

Frankfort, KY, Capital City, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 7, Amdt 2 

Frankfort, KY, Capital City, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 25, Amdt 2 

Lafayette, LA, Lafayette Rgnl, ILS OR LOC/ 

DME RWY 4R, Amdt 2 

Kaiser Lake Ozark, MO, Lee C Fine 

Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 1 

Kaiser Lake Ozark, MO, Lee C Fine 

Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1 

Kaiser Lake Ozark, MO, Lee C Fine 

Memorial, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle 

DP, Amdt 2 

Dallas, TX, Dallas Love Field, ILS OR LOC 

RWY 31R, ILS RWY 31R (SA CAT I), Amdt 

5B 

* * * Effective 27 JUNE 2013 

Gustavus, AK, Gustavus, VOR/DME RWY 29, 

Amdt 2 

Klawock, AK, Klawock, GPS RWY 2, Orig, 

CANCELED 

Klawock, AK, Klawock, KLAWOCK ONE, 

Graphic DP 

Klawock, AK, Klawock, NDB/DME RWY 2, 

Amdt 1 

Klawock, AK, Klawock, Takeoff Minimums 

and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4 

Petersburg, AK, Petersburg James A Johnson, 

LDA/DME–D, Amdt 7 

Petersburg, AK, Petersburg James A Johnson, 

PETERSBURG ONE, Graphic DP 

Petersburg, AK, Petersburg James A Johnson, 

RNAV (GPS)–B, Amdt 1 

Petersburg, AK, Petersburg James A Johnson, 

Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 

6 

Petersburg, AK, Petersburg James A Johnson, 

ZARUT ONE, Graphic DP, CANCELED 

Wrangell, AK, Wrangell, LDA/DME–C, Amdt 

8 

Wrangell, AK, Wrangell, LDA/DME–D, Amdt 

7 

Wrangell, AK, Wrangell, LEVEL ISLAND 

TWO, Graphic DP 

Wrangell, AK, Wrangell, RNAV (GPS) RWY 

10, Orig 

Wrangell, AK, Wrangell, RNAV (GPS)–A, 

Orig, CANCELED 

Dothan, AL, Dothan Rgnl, COPTER VOR 

RWY 36, Amdt 1 

Miami, FL, Miami Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 9, 

Amdt 10 

Miami, FL, Miami Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, 

Amdt 1 

Mayfield, KY, Mayfield Graves County, 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Amdt 1 

Mayfield, KY, Mayfield Graves County, 

RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 1, Amdt 1 

Mayfield, KY, Mayfield Graves County, 

RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 1, Orig 

Mayfield, KY, Mayfield Graves County, 

Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 

3 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 93 / Tuesday, May 14, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 28137 

Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl, 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Orig 

Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl, 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 1 

Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl, 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Orig 

Cape Girardeau, MO, Cape Girardeau Rgnl, 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 1 

Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, NDB RWY 4, 

Amdt 7 

Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, NDB RWY 

22, Amdt 8 

Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 4, Orig 

Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 22, Orig 

Clinton, MO, Clinton Memorial, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig 

Mountain View, MO, Mountain View, NDB 

OR GPS RWY 28, Amdt 3, CANCELED 

Mountain View, MO, Mountain View, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 10, Orig 

Mountain View, MO, Mountain View, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 28, Orig 

Tecumseh, NE, Tecumseh Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 15, Orig 

Tecumseh, NE, Tecumseh Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 33, Orig 

Tecumseh, NE, Tecumseh Muni, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig 

Gettysburg, SD, Gettysburg Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 2 

Gettysburg, SD, Gettysburg Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 2 

Vermillion, SD, Harold Davidson Field, 

RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1 

Memphis, TN, Memphis Intl, RNAV (RNP) Y 

RWY 18C, Orig-C 

Smithville, TN, Smithville Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 3 

Smithville, TN, Smithville Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 3 

Cleburne, TX, Cleburne Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 15, Amdt 1 

Cleburne, TX, Cleburne Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) 

RWY 33, Amdt 1 

Cleburne, TX, Cleburne Rgnl, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig-A 

Mineral Wells, TX, Mineral Wells, Takeoff 

Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2 

San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 8, Orig 

San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 2 

San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 17, Orig 

San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 26, Orig 

San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 31, Orig 

San Marcos, TX, San Marcos Muni, RNAV 

(GPS) RWY 35, Orig 

[FR Doc. 2013–11327 Filed 5–13–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF STATE 

22 CFR Part 62 

RIN 1400–AD28 

[Public Notice 8322] 

Exchange Visitor Program—Fees and 

Charges 

AGENCY: Department of State. 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of State 

(Department) is revising regulations to 

increase the Application Fee for 

Sponsor Designation or Redesignation 

and the Administrative Fee for 

Exchange Visitor (J–1 Visa Holder) 

Benefits assessed for providing 

Exchange Visitor Program services, in 

order to recoup the costs incurred by the 

Department’s Bureau of Educational and 

Cultural Affairs associated with 

operating the Exchange Visitor Program. 

DATES: Effective Date: This rule is 

effective June 13, 2013. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Robin J. Lerner, Deputy Assistant 

Secretary for Private Sector Exchange, 

U.S. Department of State, SA–5, Floor 5, 

2200 C Street NW., Washington, DC 

20522, 202–632–9290, or email at 

JExchanges@state.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

Department published a proposed rule 

on January 30, 2013 (RIN 1400–AD28; 

78 FR 6263), with a request for 

comments, to amend 22 CFR 62.17 

(‘‘Fees and Charges’’) to increase fees to 

recover the costs of administrative 

processing of requests for program 

designation or redesignation, and 

certain services for exchange visitor 

benefits. These costs were calculated by 

an independent, certified public 

accounting firm following the 

guidelines set forth in Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB) 

Circular A–25 regarding such fee 

calculation. 

The Department received thirteen 

comments and is now promulgating a 

final rule with no changes from the 

proposed rule. Thus, the application fee 

charged to U.S. corporate entities will 

increase to $3,982.00 for program 

designation and redesignation. The 

individual program services fee paid by 

foreign nationals will increase to 

$367.00 for services such as change of 

program category, program extensions 

and reinstatements. 

Comment Analysis 

The Department received thirteen 

comments. One comment suggested that 

the Exchange Visitor Program be shut 

down and the other, from a foreign 

national, requested assistance on visas 

and travel. These comments were not 

responsive to the proposed rule. 

Three comments represented the 

academic community and supported the 

proposed rule. One commenter stated 

that the fees should be adopted and 

believes that the Department cannot 

prevent abuses to the program if the 

Office of Designation limits itself, as it 

does now, to some 13 staff members 

monitoring more than 1,400 separate 

and distinct sponsors. Two comments 

did not object to the increases, but 

requested that sufficient time be 

allowed so that academic institutions 

could properly budget for the 47% 

increase in the application fee. The 

Department’s fee schedule is reviewed 

and implemented on a two-year cycle. 

Delaying the fee increases for all 

sponsors is not feasible. 

In addition, one of the three 

commenters who expressed support for 

the proposed rule requested clarification 

as to whether designation fees paid by 

private sector program sponsors were 

also meant to cover the cost of 

administering U.S. Government 

exchange programs. Designation fees 

paid by private sector program sponsors 

do not currently fund the administration 

of U.S. Government exchange programs, 

and the Department does not anticipate 

that private sector programs would 

cover the cost of administering such 

exchange programs in the future. 

A total of eight comments oppose the 

proposed increase in fees. One comment 

inquired about the purpose of increasing 

the application fee since the Department 

has imposed a moratorium on new 

sponsor applications for the Summer 

Work Travel category of the Exchange 

Visitor Program. Once the Department 

has completed the comprehensive 

review of the Summer Work Travel 

category, it is anticipated that the 

moratorium will be lifted. 

Another comment opposed the 

increase and stated that the opposition 

was ‘‘due to the Department’s failure to 

adequately demonstrate its best use of 

resources and lack of timely and 

knowledgeable response time to 

questions and application requests.’’ 

According to this commenter, the 

requirement to provide increased 

oversight of the Exchange Visitor 

Program over the last two years has 

diverted resources away from the 

administrative processing of stakeholder 

requests. The increase in fees is 

designed to facilitate the hiring of 

additional staff to manage the 

administrative workload in a timely 

fashion, increase the Office of 

Designation’s efficiency and enhance 

the office’s customer service. Five 


wreier-aviles on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES