alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1


Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification





I, James Darrell Thomas, certify that:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                          
|-- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2012-1 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);




2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;





4.   I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance reviews conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and





5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.





In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A.





HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTORCYCLE TRUST 2012-1By:Harley-Davidson Credit Corp.,as ServicerBy:/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary    (senior officer in charge of the servicing function)March 25, 2015
S10-I(K)2()3-()I3 

January 27, 2010 

The Honorable Raymond H. La Hood 

Secretary 

United States Departnnent of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

RE: DOT-OST-2009-0350 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

We are writing to express our strong support for the antitrust 

immunity (ATI) application filed by United Airlines, Continental and All 

Nippon Airways (ANA) with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT). 

DOT approval will enable these airlines to deliver the competitive flight 

schedules, fares and services consumers demand. 

Your leadership in this matter will ensure that the United States 

realizes the benefits of the recent Open Skies aviation agreement between 

the governments of the United States and Japan, which will not go into effect 

unless and until DOT grants the ATT request. Open Skies with Japan Is an 

enormous achievement and will produce significant benefits for consumers, 

competition and airline employees. Approval of this Important application 

will maximize the benefits to the United States of the Open Skies agreement 

with Japan by providing travelers more airline seats, destinations, routings, 

schedules and prices. 

In this challenging economic environment, our airlines need to pursue 

all opportunities to allow them and the communities they serve to stay 

competitive in an increasingly global marketplace. Approval of this 

application would allow these airlines to generate significant price and service 

benefits for consumers, help preserve and enhance service to communities 

throughout the United States, and compete more effectively with other 

international airlines and alliances. 

We thank you for your work to achieve the U.S.-Japan Open Skies 

agreement look forward to your approval of the pending application. 

Sincerely, 

Aki Tanizumi 

First Vice President 

Investor & Public Relations 

Global Services 

ProLogis 

Snioaotn;; City Cer.;er. 1-f- 2 Higa6tifSliimi3a!,lii, Miim(o-Kii, lakya 105-710') Jnpan 

rclcpho 50 ,S1iO)3 6215 «4ij0 • Facynnic tei(0)3 «21;i f)<S90
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

SEAN B. JACOBS,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 179 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 10th day of September, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification Pursuant To


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to


Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CYS Investments, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kevin E. Grant, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                  
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 26, 2016


/s/    KEVIN E. GRANTKevin E. GrantChairman of the Boardand Chief Executive Officer
AIR-12-229-E March 26, 2012 Exemption No. 9669B Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2001-8898

Ms. Caitlin M. Randles Supervisor, FAA Coordination The Boeing Company

P.O. Box 3707 Seattle, WA 98124-2207

Dear Ms. Randles:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9669, as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated February 13, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of The Boeing Company (Boeing) for an extension of Exemption No. 9669, as amended. That exemption from § 21.197 of Titl e 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows Boeing to conduct flightcrew training in aircraft operated under a special flight permit issued for production flight testing of new aircraft.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Boeing.

Our Decision

The FAA ha s determined that the justificati on for the issuance of Exemption No. 9669, as amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. §§ 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition.2

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the term ination date of Exemption No. 9669, as amended, to March 31, 2014, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 9669, as amended, remain the same. This letter must be attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 9669.

Sincerely,

/s/

Frank P. Paskiewicz Acting Deputy Director, Ai rcraft Certification

Service
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





The
      undersigned, Einat Krasney, the President and Director of Powersafe Technology
      Corp. (the “Company”), certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for
      the purposes of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
      Form
      10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934 and information contained in that Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
                    August 13, 2007By:/s/
                    Einat KrasneyName:Einat
                  KrasneyTitle:President
                    and Director
                  (Principal
                      Executive Officer)




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Quarterly Report of ENHANCE SKIN PRODUCTS INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






By:
/s/ Brian LukianDate: September 21, 2009

Brian LukianChief Financial Officer
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Group

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 95-702 Date: February 3, 1995 

SUBJECT Updated FERS Transfer Model

Enclosed with this letter is a diskette with an updated version of the FERS transfer model. The model

is a program that allows employees who have an opportunity to transfer to FERS to input data about

what they project their future careers to be to make some comparisons between CSRS and FERS

benefits. The purpose of the model is to provide employees with additional information they can use

in deciding whether to transfer to FERS. However, since it is a projection off into the future that

requires making assumptions that may or may not turn out to be accurate, the numbers produced by

the model should not be taken as projected benefits. Instead, they should be taken as something that

allows employees to evaluated the relative benefits of the two retirement systems as they apply to the

data the employee has provided.

While the program is basically the same as the original transfer model, it does have a number of help

screens that should allow most users to use it without additional assistance. There also is a users

guide that can be printed from the diskette.

We encourage you to distribute the program throughout your agency. The diskette can be copied.

It is also available on OPM Mainstreet. You can order additional copies from this office for $10.00

per copy. An order form is attached.

Reginald M. Jones, Jr.

Assistant Director 

 for Retirement Policy Development

Attachment
FERS Transfer Disk

ORDER FORM

YES, please send me copies of the FERS Transfer Disk @

$10.00 each.

TOTAL Number of copies ordered. __________

The total cost of my order is $ .

Name 

Organization 

Street Address 

City, State, Zip 

Phone 

Fax 

Please enclose a check payable to OPM with order form.

Send all order forms and checks to:

Attn: FERS Transfer Disk

Office of Retirement Policy Development

P.O. Box 57 

U.S. Office of Personnel Management

Washington, D.C. 20044

If you are a Federal Agency and would prefer to be billed, please provide the following

information:

Agency Location Code (ALC) - 

Agency Accounting Data - 

(include all accounting information required for proper billing, such as Document/Purchase Order/Requisition No.,

Index/Dept. code)
Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, Rune Magnus Lundetræ, certify
that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Seadrill Partners LLC;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The companys other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) [Omitted pursuant to the transition period exemption for newly
public companies];

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The companys other
certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.

Date: April 30, 2013



|                           
|---------------------------
|/s/ Rune Magnus Lundetræ   
|Rune Magnus Lundetræ       
|Principal Financial Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6504

RONNIE KNIGHT,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

EDWARD HABEEB, Doctor,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.

(CA-98-89-2)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Knight, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Ronnie Knight appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint under 28

U.S.C.A. § 1915(b)(1) (West Supp. 1998). The district court found

that Knight failed to either submit a signed form consenting to the

collection of fees or submit the entire filing fee. The district

court, however, subsequently redocketed the action upon finding

that Knight complied with the court order. Accordingly, we dismiss

the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
II 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3192 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Received 

AN ACT 

To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement 

of integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan 

transactions under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in Lending Act, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3192 RDS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Homebuyers Assist3 ance Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT SAFE HARBOR. 

5 The integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage 

6 loan transactions under section 4(a) of the Real Estate 

7 Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2603(a)), 

8 section 105(b) of the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 

9 1604(b)), and regulations issued under such sections may 

10 not be enforced against any person until February 1, 

11 2016, and no suit may be filed against any person for a 

12 violation of such requirements occurring before such date, 

13 so long as such person has made a good faith effort to 

14 comply with such requirements. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3350 

AN ACT 

To require a terrorism threat assessment regarding the 

transportation of chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological materials through United States land borders and 

within the United States, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3350 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Know the CBRN Ter3 rorism Threats to Transportation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. TERRORISM THREAT ASSESSMENT. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 90 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Home7 land Security, acting through the Under Secretary of In8 telligence and Analysis, shall conduct a terrorism threat 

9 assessment of the transportation of chemical, biological, 

10 nuclear, and radiological materials through United States 

11 land borders and within the United States. 

12 (b) CONSULTATION.—In preparing the terrorism 

13 threat assessment required under subsection (a), the 

14 Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis shall con15 sult with the Administrator of the Transportation Security 

16 Administration, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and 

17 Border Protection, and the heads of other Federal depart18 ments and agencies, as appropriate, to ensure that such 

19 terrorism threat assessment is informed by current infor20 mation about homeland security threats. 

21 (c) DISTRIBUTION.—Upon completion of the ter22 rorism threat assessment required under subsection (a), 

23 the Under Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis shall 

24 disseminate such terrorism threat assessment to Federal 

25 partners, including the Department of Transportation and 
3 

•HR 3350 EH

1 the Department of Energy, and State and local partners, 

2 including the National Network of Fusion Centers. 

Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3350 

AN ACT 

To require a terrorism threat assessment regarding 

States, and for other purposes. States land borders and within the United clear, and radiological materials through United the transportation of chemical, biological, nu-
#### Norman BAKER, Appellant, v. Frank HUX, Appellee.

No. 10499.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Aug. 9, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 27, 1939.

Neel & King and M. J. Raymond, all of Laredo, John M. Jamison, of Houston, and Fred Wulff, of Laredo, for appellant.

Gordon Gibson, Horace C. Hall, Jr., and Mitchell Schwartzman, all of Laredo, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed without written opinion, on authority of Associated Indemnity Corporation et al. v. J. M. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294.
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NOS. PD-0444-14, 0445-14

ANTHONY ALAMIA, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS

COLLIN COUNTY

YEARY, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

O P I N I O N

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissenting opinion in Smith v. State, 463 S.W.3d

890 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015).

FILED: December 16, 2015

DO NOT PUBLISH
#### STRONG v. STATE.

No. 18152.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 8, 1936.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*412CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is burglary; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. N.o question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

MORROW, P. J., absent.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the quarterly report of Purio Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated:  November 16, 2009





By:       /s/ Daryl English


Daryl English


President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary and Treasurer