alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350)

The undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of 2020 ChinaCap Acquirco, Inc., certify that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 2020 ChinaCap Acquirco, Inc. at the
dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The undersigned expressly
disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing certification except as required by law.



|                   |  |                                         
|------------------ |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  | /s/ George Lu                           
|                   |  | George Lu                               
|                   |  | President and Chief Executive Officer   
|                   | 
|Date: May 14, 2008 |  | /s/ Louis Koo                           
|                   |  | Louis Koo                               
|                   |  | Vice President & Chief Financial Officer



3
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




The
      undersigned, Jack N. Mayer, the President, Treasurer and Sole Director of
      Powersafe Technology Corp. (the “ Company ”),
      certifies, under the standards set forth and solely for the purposes of 18
      U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company
      for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information
      contained in that Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the Company.






Date:
      May
      15, 2008


By: /s/
      Jack
      N. Mayer


Name: Jack
      N.
      Mayer


Title: President,
      Treasurer and Sole Director


(Principal
      Executive Officer and Principal


Financial
      and Accounting Officer)






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### MUSSLEWHITE v. ALLEN.

No. 10823.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Galveston.

April 13, 1939.

Lewright, Dyer & Sorrell, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

*971L. W. Pollard and O. H. Middlebrooks, both of Rosenberg, for appellee.

CODY, Justice.

This is a plea of 'privilege case, and is a companion case to C. E. Musslewhite v. A. N. Vos, 127 S.W.2d 969, cause No. 10824 on the docket of this court, opinion in which is this day handed down.

The appellee in this case is the widow of Ray Allen who was the driver of the truck in which Vos was riding and which collided with the truck of- appellant, as has been detailed in our opinion this day delivered in aforesaid cause No. 10824. As a result of the collision Ray Allen was killed. But in the trial of the instant case, different from the Vos case, appellant produced the driver of his truck as a witness, and had him testify, and the case was submitted to the jury on special issues. The only assignment of error urged on this appeal is that the court declined to give the charge requested by appellant on circumstantial evidence. Such refusal was not error.

While it is true that appellee had to rely on circumstantial evidence to make out her case, and under authorities cited by appellant, she had the right to have the court instruct the jury that they might consider that character of evidence in determining this issue; it does not follow that the converse of this is true, and appellant frankly concedes that he has been unable to find any authority sustaining the converse. The rule under the authorities aforesaid is for the benefit of the party forced to rely on circumstantial evidence. Appellant did not rely on circumstantial evidence in making his defense, but upon the testimony of an eyewitness. It seems to us that for the court to have commented on the obvious fact appellee was relying on circumstantial evidence in this case, over her objection, would have amounted, under the circumstances of this case, to an adverse comment on the weight of the evidence. Indeed, “the rule seems to be well established in this state that, where a party relies upon circumstantial evidence to establish his cause of action, or his defense, it is only necessary that said fact be established to the satisfaction of the jury by a preponderance of the evidence, whether same be circumstantial or otherwise”. Buro v. Home Benefit Ass’n, Tex. Civ.App., 28 S.W.2d 902, 905. The Court properly charged upon the preponderance of the evidence, and this was all that appellant was entitled to. Appellant’s assignment of error is overruled, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Judgment aifirmed.
Attachment BAL 06-801

Payroll Provider Questionnaire 

FSAFEDS Account Funds Transfers 

Complete this questionnaire and return it via fax to: 

Attn: Jeremy Pucko Fax Number: 1 (603) 430-6479 

Please fill in your contact information below. 

Payroll Provider: 

Your Name : 

Your Email Address: 

Your Phone Number: 

Please check next to the appropriate selection 

1. What method will you use to adjust W-2’s for FSAFEDS 

AFTs? 

Manual 

Automated/Bill File 

If you selected “automated/bill file” please go to Question 5. BENEFEDS will contact you to 

discuss file format and other necessary changes. 

2. If you checked “manual”, in which file format do you 

prefer to receive AFT info? 

Excel Spreadsheet 

Text File 

- 5 - 
Attachment BAL 06-80X 

3. Our standard file layout includes the following fields/information: 

• Social Security Number 

• Dollar Amount 

• Date transfer occurred 

• Account type transferred from 

• Account type transferred to 

Please indicate below any additional fields/information you need to receive from BENEFEDS to 

process AFTs: 

4. How often do you prefer to receive AFT information? 

• Each pay period 

• Monthly 

• Yearly 

• Other (please specify) 

5. In very rare circumstances, we do not know about an erroneous account until after you have 

generated W-2’s. 

When do you generate W-2 information? 

Is there a different procedure you’d like us to 

utilize when a W-2C is needed? 

Yes No 

If yes, please specify 

Thank you for your assistance! 

- 6 -
Sample Notice for Employees 

What New Benefit Can I Apply for in 2002? 

The Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program will be available in 2002. It’s a program to 

provide insurance to help you pay for chronic, long term care (such as help getting out of bed or 

help eating or dressing) that you may develop due to an illness, accident, or the normal aging 

process. You may be healthy now, but who knows what will happen next year, in five years or 

even in 20 years or beyond. About half of us will need long term care at some point in our lives. 

 And you can’t count on Medicare and FEHB to provide it. 

Who is Sponsoring This New Program? 

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management sponsors the program, established by Public Law 106-

265, the Long-Term Care Security Act. 

What Companies Are Providing the Insurance? 

OPM just announced that two of the nation’s premier insurance companies joined ranks and won 

the competition to provide coverage under this Program – Metropolitan Life Insurance Company 

and John Hancock Life Insurance Company. They formed a partnership named Long Term Care 

Partners. 

Will I be Guaranteed Coverage? 

All employees who apply for the insurance will not be eligible for the standard insurance. 

However, all employees who apply will be offered something, perhaps non-standard insurance 

(different benefits and/or higher premiums) or a non-insurance product. It is not like the FEHB 

program where everyone eligible who applies for a given policy gets the same coverage and pays 

the same premium. 

Do I Need to Do Anything Now? 

No, you don’t. OPM and Long Term Care Partners will be providing an extensive educational 

and marketing program to introduce you to this new program and help you make informed 

decisions about whether to purchase a policy and what type of coverage you may need. You 

don’t need to worry if you currently know little or nothing about long term care insurance or the 

Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program. There will be satellite broadcasts, videotapes, 

meetings in agency cafeterias and auditoriums across the country, informative booklets and 

brochures, interactive websites, etc. All that will take place in 2002, with an open season to 

apply for the program in the late summer/early fall of 2002. 

I Already Know About This Insurance. Can I Apply Now? 

Individuals who don’t need the educational program can apply for the insurance during an early 

enrollment opportunity, probably in March 2002. OPM will announce details about the early 

enrollment soon. 
I Have a Lot More Questions About this New Program. Who Can Answer Them? 

You can visit the Office of Personnel Management website at www.opm.gov/insure/ltc. It 

contains extensive frequently asked questions and the proposed product design (benefits). 

Premiums aren’t available yet.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 402 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-762, K2024-55.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22709 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### GRADY v. STATE.

No. 18422.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 21, 1936.

C. C. McKinney, of Cooper, and S. W. Pratt, of Commerce, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Judge.

The conviction is for violation of the so-called Local Option Law (Vernon’s Ann.P. C. art. 666 — 1 et *seq.);*penalty assessed at a fine of $100.

The complaint and information contain the averment that the appellant “did then and there unlawfully possess for the purpose of sale certain whiskey, in said Hunt Co., Texas, then and there being a dry area as defined by law.” The averment mentioned is insufficient to allege a violation of the law. See opinion of Judge Hawkins in the case of Whitmire v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 742, to- the effect that the indictment or information must show that an election was held and that as a result thereof the act complained of was prohibited. See, also, Schmidt v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 743.

Under the present complaint and information, the judgment must be reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed. It is so ordered.
#### BARNES v. STATE.

No. 18503.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

M. H. *Gibson,*of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is forgery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented.

Appellant entered a plea of guilty and waived a jury upon the trial.

The record is here without statement of facts or bills of .exception.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# mlniteb**~tate~** 

# QCourtof**~peaI~** 

# for !be jf 

# eberaI QCirmit

ROBERT BOSCH LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, 

### v. PYLON MANUFACTURING CORP., Defendant-CrossAppellant. 2011-1363, -1364 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District ofDelaware in case no. OB-CV-0542, Judge Sue L. Robinson. 

### ON MOTION ORDER Robert Bosch LLC moves for a 30-day extension of time, until January 21, 2012, to file its response and reply brief. Upon considerationthereof, IT Is ORDERED THAT:**I----------~** .. ----- .ROBERT BOSCH v. PYLON MFG CORP The motion is granted. 

## DEC 21 2011 Date

cc: Mark A. Pals, Esq Mark A. Hannemann, Esq. 

### s21 FOR THE COURT /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk 2



## u.s.

## CouJ~~~~EALS fOR TH[ FEDERAL CIRCUIT 

## DEC 21 2011

JANHORBALY Cl£RK
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 3, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 406 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-767, K2024-60.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22756 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 28, 2017

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-3 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer),
does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2016 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from
the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Ron TremblayName:

Ron TremblayTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 28, 2017




---

<for SEMT2012-3>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated June 27,
2012 (the Agreement).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the report of Nacel Energy Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark Schaftlein, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Mark SchaftleinMark SchaftleinChief Executive Officer andPrincipal Accounting Officer





February 22, 2011
We have audited the financial statements of Science Based Industries Campus Ltd
("the Company") as at 31 December 1998 and 1997 and the income statements,
statements of changes in shareholders' equity and statements of cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended 31 December 1998. These financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's board of directors and
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, including standards prescribed by the Auditors' (Mode of Performance)
Regulations, 1973. These standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement, either due to error or to intentional misrepresentation.
An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes examining
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Company's
board of directors and management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a fair basis for our
opinion.

The above financial statements were prepared on the historical cost basis
adjusted for changes in the general purchasing power of the Israeli currency
according to pronouncements of the Institute of Certified Public Accountants in
Israel. Condensed nominal data of the Company, on the basis of which its
adjusted financial statements were prepared, are presented in Note 16.

In our opinion, based on our audits, the above financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at 31
December 1998 and 1997, and the results of operations, the changes in
shareholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended 31 December 1998. Also, in our opinion, the above financial statements
were prepared in accordance with the Securities Regulations (Preparation of
Annual Financial Statements), 1993.

Accounting principles generally accepted in Israel differ in certain respects
from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, mainly in
respect of assets, net income and shareholders' equity. Adjustments between
generally accepted accounting principles in Israel and the United States are
presented in a schedule attached to these financial statements.

Bavly & Co.
Certified Public Accountants (Israel)

Jerusalem, 9 February 1999
**Exhibit 35.2**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**BARCLAYS BANK PLC**

**BARCLAYS DRYROCK ISSUANCE TRUST**

 

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report on Form10-K of Barclays Dryrock Issuance Trust for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 (the “Report”), the undersigned,a duly authorized officer of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

 

1. A review of the activities and performanceof the Servicer under the Services Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2012, by and between Barclays Bank Delaware and the Servicer(the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.

 

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on suchreview, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period thatis the subject of the Report.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has dulyexecuted this Servicer Compliance Statement this 17th of March 2017.