2010 Federal Child Care
 

Subsidy Program
 

Call for Data Results
 

June 2012
 
2010 Federal Child Care Subsidy Program 

Call for Data Results 

2010 REPORT 

Table of Contents 

Background ............................................................................................................................ 2 

Why Subsidize Child Care? ...................................................................................................2
 

The FCCSP Call for Data .......................................................................................................3 

Trends Over Time .................................................................................................................. 3 

Key Results ............................................................................................................................ 4
 

Analysis ................................................................................................................................. 4 

Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 6 

References ............................................................................................................................ 7 

Appendix A: 2010 Data Results ............................................................................................8 

Appendix B: Cost of Program Administration ......................................................................11 

Appendix C: Child Care Centers and Family Based Homes ...............................................13 

Appendix D: Top 10 Agencies/Components by Amount Disbursed ....................................15 

Appendix E: Additional Data ...............................................................................................16
 

Appendix F: OPM Form 1645 .............................................................................................19 

1
 
 

 

 

Results 

Background 

The Federal Child Care Subsidy Program (FCCSP), established in 2001 by section 630 of 

Public Law 107-67, allows agencies to use appropriated funds to help lower-income 

Federal employees pay for child care. Federal agencies choose whether or not they wish 

to participate, based on considerations such as budget, mission priorities, and the 

demographics and needs of their employee population. Agencies that establish a subsidy 

program are given broad latitude in determining key elements and parameters of their 

programs, including income ceilings and total amounts to be disbursed. Federal 

regulation requires that child care providers be licensed and/or regulated by the State and, 

where applicable, by local authorities where the childcare service is delivered. Agencies 

pay directly to the child care provider the child care subsidy for Federal employees who 

qualify for the program. 

Each implementing agency administers its program, often through a contract with a thirdparty administrator. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) provides 

guidance, support and resources to Federal agencies for the FCCSP. Resources include 

the Guide for Implementing Child Care Legislation 

(http://www.opm.gov/Employment_and_Benefits/WorkLife/OfficialDocuments/Handboo 

ksGuides/Childcare_Legislation/index.asp), informational meetings with agency subsidy 

coordinators to share ideas and best practices, child care subsidy workshops, and one-onone assistance to agencies contemplating implementation of a program. 

Why Subsidize Child Care? 

The costs of child care in the United States continue to grow at an alarming rate. In fact, 

the cost of child care has grown twice as fast as the median income of families with 

children since 2000. Findings from the White House Middle Class Task Force show that 

full-time infant care often costs more than $10,000 per year. Average yearly costs are 

still soaring, ranging between $4,000 and $15,000 for infants, and $4,000 and $11,000 for 

4-year-olds. In 39 states, child care fees are higher than a year’s tuition at a 4-year public 

college.1

 The FCCSP can reduce these costs so that lower-income employees gain access 

to quality child care. Offering a subsidy program in turn helps Federal agencies recruit 

and retain the staff they need to accomplish their mission. 

McSweeny, T. (2010, January 29). Helping Middle Class Families with Soaring Child Care Costs. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/01/29/helping-middle-class-families-with-soaring-child-care-costs . 

2 

1 
 

 

The FCCSP Call for Data 

As required by 5 CFR 792.204, OPM issues an annual call for child care subsidy data 

(the Call) to all participating agencies or agency components at the beginning of each 

calendar year. Agencies/components use the OPM Form 1645 (Appendix G) to make an 

electronic submission. The data are compiled and an information copy of the results is 

sent to Congress. 

Annual data exist from the inception of the program through the current reporting year 

with basic information about agency/component disbursements, employees and children 

served, and some programmatic details. OPM uses the information gathered to better 

serve those who currently participate in the FCCSP, and to encourage more participation 

Government-wide. 

Trends Over Time 

Thirty-three Federal agencies/components now offer child care subsidies (Appendix A). 

All but one of these agencies (National Science Foundation) implemented their programs 

in 2001. The total amount disbursed through these programs has averaged about 5.4 

million over the past several years (Figure 1), with a 2010 average per-child payment of 

$1,5372, an 18% increase over 2009 average per-child payment of $1,301. 

Figure 1 

$5,904,560 $5,597,885 $5,621,532 

$5,053,724 $5,488,399 $4,803,909 

1,000,000 

2,000,000 

3,000,000 

4,000,000 

5,000,000 

6,000,000 

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 

Year 

Total Funds Disbursed 2005 - 2010 

2

 Average per child spending is derived by dividing the total disbursed in 2010 (Figure 1) by the total 

number of children enrolled in 2010. 

3
 
 

 

Key Results 

The responses to our 2010 Data Call reveal the following highlights: 

 The total amount disbursed by participating agencies/components in fiscal year 

2010 was $4,803,909. This represents a decrease of $684,490 from the 2009 total. 

 There was a decrease in the number of employees (3,240 in 2009 to 2,214 in 

2010) and children (4,303 in 2009 to 3,125 in 2010) enrolled in the program. 

	 The income ceiling for Federal agencies with a CCSP range from $50,000 to 

$75,000. Three agencies/components increased their income ceiling level for 

2010; the average increase was $12,343.3 

o	 General Services Administration 

o	 HHS’ Health Resources and Services Administration 

o	 Securities and Exchange Commission 

	 Most agencies/components are paying less than 50 percent of the total cost of 

child care for those enrolled in their programs. 

Analysis 

Thirty-three (33) agencies or agency components have child care subsidy programs.4 All 

33 agencies responded to the Data Call. 

In 2010, participating agencies and components saw an overall decrease in the amount 

disbursed compared to 2009 (Figure 1). Agencies disbursed a total of $4,803,909 in 2010 

– a 12.5% decrease. However, as indicated in Appendix A, a few agencies saw increases 

in disbursements due to increased enrollment and increased costs in providing childcare 

services. The newest agency to offer childcare subsidies, the National Science 

Foundation (NSF), saw the highest percentage increase in disbursements – 152% over the 

previous year – and a 36% increase in enrollment. In addition to increased enrollment and 

childcare costs, the large increases at NSF can be attributable to the fact that the NSF 

program was initiated in the spring of 2009 and, therefore, was not offered for a full year 

in 2009.5

 Additionally, the Department of the Interior saw a 120% increase in 

disbursements and a 67% increase in enrollment over the previous year. In both these 

agencies, percentage increases in disbursements are proportionally larger than increases 

in enrollment primarily due to an overall increase in the cost of providing childcare 

services. 

Though there were several noteworthy increases in disbursement, many agencies 

continue to pay out less than previous years. Agencies such as the Department of 

3

 The average is rounded to the nearest dollar. 4

 There are 21 agencies offering subsidy programs; however, some of these agencies have components with 

their own subsidy programs. Therefore, these components are counted individually, resulting in a total of 

33 reporting entities. The Department of Health and Human Services, for example, has 6 component 

agencies that offer the subsidy. 

5 When comparing the total amount of funds distributed in FY 2009 to the total amount distributed FY 

2010, we are comparing 6 months of funds expended to 12 months of funds expended. 

4 
 

 

 

Transportation’s Federal Railroad Administration and HHS’ Administration on Aging 

decreased their disbursements by 78 and 71 percent, respectively. This is a result of a 

decline in the enrollment at these agencies. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 

also saw a 50 percent decrease in disbursements in 2010. Prior to 2010, the VA began 

experiencing problems with the contractor administered program and how child care 

subsidy payments were being made to child care providers of their enrollees. As a result, 

the VA decided to suspend subsidy payments until the problems were resolved. In 

September 2010, the VA reestablished the program and staffed the office with Federal 

employees. The time elapsed between the suspension and reestablishment of the program 

created a backlog of child care subsidy payments in 2010. 

The 12.5 percent decline in total disbursements from 2009 to 2010 reflects a large decline 

in disbursements at several agencies, as well as a decline in the participation rate among 

employees. The number of employees participating declined from 3,240 in 2009 to 2,214 

in 2010 and the number of children participating declined from 4,303 in 2009 to 3,125 in 

2010 (Appendix A). 

The number of children enrolled in child care centers and family child care homes has 

also decreased significantly. Agencies/components that responded indicated there are 

1,251 children in child care centers and 310 children in family child care homes. This is 

a rather large change from 2009, when there were 3,491 children in child care centers and 

717 children in family child care homes.6 

Three agencies actually increased their income ceiling level in 2010 – the salary above 

which an employee is ineligible for a child care subsidy – while the remainder of the 

participating agencies remained at the same levels. Given the economic climate, agencies 

are continuing to face challenges in making the business case for child care subsidy. The 

relatively stagnant income ceilings are still a barrier to participation as indicated by the 

overall decline in enrollment. Some agencies want to increase their income ceiling, but 

face budgetary issues that do not permit them to be able to offer an increase. Yet, other 

agencies that have increased their ceilings, still realized little to almost no increase in 

participation rate, suggesting there are multiple barriers. 

Conclusion 

The FCCSP is an important work/life program in the Federal Government and is a useful 

tool for recruiting and retaining employees. The CCSP is also a tool employees can use 

in helping to make child care affordable. While many agencies increased the amount of 

subsidies that were paid and the amount paid to each participant rose, overall there was 

still a decrease in enrollment and a decline in the total amount disbursed. A few 

agencies, however, are trying to increase their income ceilings, even in a climate marked 

by significant budget constraints. 

6

 The sum of the number of children in child care homes and child care centers is less than the total number 

of participating children. This is due to the fact that we report the numbers as given to us by the agencies. 

We note that there was a significant difference in the numbers reported to us by the Department of VA. 

5 
 

OPM, as the lead agency providing guidance and support to agencies on all aspects of 

this program, continues to promote implementation and utilization of the FCCSP at 

work/life coordinator meetings, specialized workshops, agency visits and 

conferences/seminars, while agencies monitor and maintain their programs and annually 

report on them to OPM through the Call (Appendix A and Appendix G). Efforts to 

continue to provide support to agencies will strengthen as we encourage agencies without 

FCCSPs to consider establishing such programs. Information about the FCCSP can be 

found on www.opm.gov/worklife. 

6 
References 

1. McSweeny, T. (2010, January 29). Helping Middle Class Families with Soaring Child 

Care Costs. Retrieved March 15, 2011, from 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/01/29/helping-middle-class-families-with-soaringchild-care-costs. 

7 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Appendix A 

2010 Data Results 

Comparison of 2009 and 2010 Data (Agency/Component Name, Income 

Ceiling, 2009 Funds, 2010 Funds, Number of Employees, Number of Children, 

Percent Change) 

% 

Agency/ 

Component 

Name 

2009 

Income 

Ceiling 

2010 

Income 

Ceiling 

2009 

Funds 

Paid 

2010 Funds 

Paid 

2009 # of 

Employees 

2010 # of 

Employees 

2009 # of 

Children 

2010 # of 

Children 

Change 

in 

Funds 

Paid 

Central 

Intelligence $70,000 $70,000 $206,777 $148,410 60 46 75 57 (28) 

Agency 

Department of 

Education $50,000 $50,000 $6,750 $10,545 3 4 3 4 56% 

Department of 

Housing and 

Urban $69,999 $69,999 $207,714 $131,881 83 76 109 91 (37%) 

Development 

Department of 

the Interior $60,000 $60,000 $5,923 $13,054 3 5 3 5 120% 

Department of 

Labor $59,999 $59,999 $175,375 $156,251 145 84 175 115 (11%) 

Department of 

State $75,000 $75,000 $170,003 $200,704 68 77 91 93 18% 

DOT - Federal 

Aviation $72,000 $72,000 $627,152 $998,710 238 300 322 329 59% 

Administration 

DOT - Federal 

Railroad $75,000 $75,000 $2,203 $480 3 1 3 1 (78% ) 

Administration 

Environmental 

Protection $75,000 $75,000 $194,014 $198,795 75 72 97 97 2% 

Agency 

Federal 

Energy 

Regulatory 

Did not 

report $72,000 Did not report $16,122* Did not report 5 Did not report 5 NA 

Commission 

General 

Services $63,300 $64,400 $259,574 $334,160 68 77 71 100 29% 

Administration 

HHS -

Administration $50,000 $50,000 $11,283 $3,287 11 6 17 7 (71%) 

on Aging 

HHS - Centers $65,000 $65,000 $162,933 $158,548 85 77 114 98 (3%) 

8
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% 

Agency/ 

Component 

Name 

2009 

Income 

Ceiling 

2010 

Income 

Ceiling 

2009 

Funds 

Paid 

2010 Funds 

Paid 

2009 # of 

Employees 

2010 # of 

Employees 

2009 # of 

Children 

2010 # of 

Children 

Change 

in 

Funds 

Paid 

for Disease 

Control 

HHS - Food & 

Drug $75,000 $75,000 $153,688 $158,718 59 66 97 95 3% 

Administration 

HHS - Heath 

Resources and 

Services $40,000 $75,000 $0 $11,850 0 12 0 13 0% 

Administration 

HHS -

National 

Institutes of $60,000 $60,000 $304,805 $330,872 144 133 189 171 9% 

Health 

HHS -

Program 

Support $75,000 $75,000 $112,726 $76,128 27 19 47 29 (32%) 

Center 

HHS -

Substance 

Abuse and 

Mental Health $50,000 $50,000 $3,826 $2,250 1 1 1 1 (41%) 

Services 

Administration 

HUD - Office 

of Inspector $69,999 $69,999 $6,243 $7,268 2 4 2 5 16% 

General 

National 

Labor 

Relations $50,346 $50,346 $12,245 $11,695 5 6 6 7 (4%) 

Board 

National 

Science $75,000 $75,000 $24,306 $61,207 13 17 14 19 152% 

Foundation 

Nuclear 

Regulatory $68,000 $68,000 $22,560 $28,124 13 11 20 16 25% 

Commission 

Office of 

Personnel $60,000 $60,000 $109,581 $87,139 34 38 48 54 (20%) 

Management 

Pension 

Benefit 

Guaranty $67,775 $67,775 $54,071 $39,081 18 14 19 15 (28%) 

Corporation 

Railroad 

Retirement $60,000 $60,000 $0 $5,642 0 2 0 2 NA 

Board 

9
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

% 

Agency/ 

Component 

Name 

2009 

Income 

Ceiling 

2010 

Income 

Ceiling 

2009 

Funds 

Paid 

2010 Funds 

Paid 

2009 # of 

Employees 

2010 # of 

Employees 

2009 # of 

Children 

2010 # of 

Children 

Change 

in 

Funds 

 

Paid 

Securities and 

Exchange $61,740 $62,668 $31,948 $27,646 13 10 15 12 (13%) 

Commission 

Treasury - US 

BPD $75,000 $75,000 $33,558 $39,240 25 33 38 48 17% 

Treasury - US 

Mint $60,000 NA $0 NA 0 NA 0 NA NA 

Treasury-IRSOffice of $51,500 $51,500 $17,706 $37,710 8 9 8 11 113% 

Chief Counsel 

USDA - Farm 

Service 

Agency 

Did not 

report $46,999 Did not 

report $5,247* Did not 

report 4 Did not 

report 4 NA 

USDA -

Foreign 

Agricultural 

Did not 

report $59,999 Did not report $6,638* Did not report 7 Did not report 7 NA 

Service 

USDA -

Research, 

Education & 

Did not 

report $60,000 Did not 

report $161,813* Did not report 73 Did not report 94 NA 

Economics 

Veterans 

Affairs $60,000 $59,999 $2,682,978 $1,334,694 2036 925 2719 1520 (50%) 

Total $5,488,3997 $4,803,9097 3,240 2,214 4,303 3,125 (12.5%) 

7

 This total does not include funds paid by agencies who reported funds paid in 2010 but not 2009 or who 

reported funds paid in 2009 but not 2010. Those agencies are noted with an asterisk (*). For those 

agencies, since there are no funds reported in 2009 or 2010, it would be inaccurate to reflect funds paid in 

the total 

10
 
 

Appendix B 

Cost of Program Administration 

This table shows the cost for each agency/component to administer the child care 

subsidy program. 

Agency/Component Name Program Administration Cost of Administration 

Federal Employee 

Central Intelligence Agency Education and Assistance $12,873 

(FEEA) 

Department of Education Department of Education $10,545 

Department of Housing and FEEA & First Financial $258,000 Urban Development Associates, Inc. 

Department of the Interior GSA $2,425 

First Financial Associates, Department of Labor $29,400 Inc. 

Department of State FEEA $17,056 

DOT - Federal Aviation Administrative Services, $60,000 Administration Inc. 

DOT - Federal Railroad ASI Works, Inc. $2,928 Administration 

Environmental Protection FEEA $16,904 Agency 

Federal Energy Regulatory FERC $0

GSA $35,855 Administration

Commission (FERC)

General Services 

HHS - Administration on 

Aging 

First Financial Associates, $30,424*8 

Inc. 

HHS - Centers for Disease FEEA $13,684 Control
 

HHS - Food & Drug 

Administration 

First Financial Associates, $30,424* Inc. 

HHS - Heath Resources and 

Services Admin FEEA $1,948

HHS - National Institutes of 

Health
 FEEA $27,470

HHS - Program Support 

Center 

First Financial Associates, $30,424* Inc. 

HHS - Substance Abuse and First Financial Associates, $30,424* 

8

 * These agencies, HHS – AoA, FDA, PSC, and SAMHSA, are administered under the same contract. They did not have 

individual costs for administration for each agency, but rather a combined total of $30,424. 

11 
Agency/Component Name Program Administration Cost of Administration 

Mental Health Services Inc. 

Administration
 

HUD - Office of Inspector 

General 

First Financial Associates, $1,218 Inc. 

National Labor Relations 

Board 

First Financial Associates, $1,525 Inc. 

National Science Foundation FCCS $5,905 

Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission FEEA $3,250

Office of Personnel FEEA $7,971 Management 

FCCS $4,126 Corporation 

Railroad Retirement Board

Pension Benefit Guaranty 

 FEEA $1,451 

Securities and Exchange 

Commission FEEA $3,212

Treasury - US BPD Treasury –US BPD $0 

Treasury - US Mint US Mint NA 

Treasury-IRS-Office of FEEA $4,016 Chief Counsel 

USDA - Farm Service NA $11,885 Agency

USDA - Foreign NA $11,885 Agricultural Service

USDA - Research, NA $26,720 Education & Economics

Veterans Affairs Veteran Affairs $863,357 

12 
Appendix C 

Number of participants who used child care centers and family homes 

Agency/Component Name Child Care Center Family Home 

Central Intelligence Agency 45 12 

Department of Education 3 1 

Department of Housing and 

Urban Development 75 16 

Department of the Interior 4 1 

Department of Labor 96 19 

Department of State 84 9 

DOT - Federal Aviation 

Administration 275 45 

DOT - Federal Railroad 

Administration 1 1 

Environmental Protection 

Agency 87 10 

Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 5 0 

General Services 

Administration 3 74 

HHS - Administration on 

Aging 6 1 

HHS - Centers for Disease 

Control 92 6 

HHS - Food & Drug 

Administration 75 20 

HHS - Heath Resources and 

Services Admin 7 6 

HHS - National Institutes of 

Health 120 51 

HHS - Program Support 

Center 24 5 

HHS - Substance Abuse and 

Mental Health Services 0 1 

Administration 

HUD - Office of Inspector 

General 5 0 

National Labor Relations 

Board 7 0 

National Science Foundation 15 4 

Nuclear Regulatory 

Commission 14 2 

Office of Personnel 

Management 44 10 

13 
Agency/Component Name Child Care Center Family Home 

Pension Benefit Guaranty 

Corporation 12 3 

Railroad Retirement Board 2 0 

Securities and Exchange 

Commission 12 0 

Treasury - US BPD 47 1 

Treasury - US Mint NA NA 

Treasury-IRS-Office of 

Chief Counsel 8 0 

USDA - Farm Service 

Agency 9 2 

USDA - Foreign Agricultural 

Service 2 2 

USDA - Research, Education 

& Economics 3 4 

Veterans Affairs 69 4 

Total 1,251 310 

14 
Appendix D 

Top 10 Agencies/Components by Amount Disbursed 

Agency/Component Name Highest Amount 

Veterans Affairs $1,334,694 

DOT - Federal Aviation Administration $998,710 

General Services Administration $334,160 

HHS - National Institutes of Health $330,872 

Department of State $200,704 

Environmental Protection Agency $198,795 

USDA - Research, Education & Economics $161,813 

HHS – Food and Drug Administration $158,718 

HHS - Centers for Disease Control $158,548 

Department of Labor $156,251 

15 
Appendix E 

Additional Data 

Note: Numbers are rounded to the nearest dollar amount. 

Agency/ 

Component 

Name
 

Central 

Intelligence 

Agency

Department of 

Education 

Department of 

Housing and 

Urban 

Development 

Department of 

the Interior 

Department of 

Labor 

Department of 

State 

DOT - Federal 

Aviation 

Administration 

DOT - Federal 

Railroad 

Administration 

Environmental 

Protection 

Agency 

Federal Energy 

Regulatory 

Commission 

General 

Services 

Administration 

HHS -

Administration 

on Aging 

AVG Yearly 

Amount Per 

Employee
 

$3,226 

$2,636 

$1,735 

$2,611 

$1,860 

$2,601 

$3,329 

$480 

$2,761 

$3,224 

$4,340 

$548 

AVG Yearly 

Amount Per 

Child
 

$2,604 

$2,636 

$1,449 

$2,611 

$1,359 

$2,158 

$2,567 

$480 

$2,049 

$3,224 

$3,342 

$470 

Highest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement 

Lowest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement
 

$875 $9 

$380 $380

$630 $22

$394 $194

$500 $9

$690 $18

$1,352 $17

$231.88 $44

$1,008 $20

$326 $152

$2,016 $35

$900 $47

16 
Agency/ 

Component 

Name
 

HHS - Centers 

for Disease 

Control 

HHS - Food & 

Drug 

Administration 

HHS - Heath 

Resources and 

Services Admin 

HHS - National 

Institutes of 

Health 

HHS - Program 

Support Center 

HHS -

Substance 

Abuse and 

Mental Health 

Services 

Administration 

HUD - Office of 

Inspector 

General 

National Labor 

Relations Board 

National 

Science 

Foundation 

Nuclear 

Regulatory 

Commission 

Office of 

Personnel 

Management 

Pension Benefit 

Guaranty 

Corporation 

Railroad 

Retirement 

Board 

AVG Yearly 

Amount Per 

Employee
 

$2,059 

$2,405 

$988 

$2,488 

$4,007 

$2,250 

$1,817

$1,949 

$3,600

$2,557

$2,293

$2,792

$2,821

AVG Yearly 

Amount Per 

Child
 

$1,618 

$1,671 

$912 

$1,935 

$2,625 

$2,250 

$1,454

$1,671 

$3,221

$1,758

$1,614

$2,605

$2,821

Highest Lowest 

Monthly Monthly 

Employee Employee 

Disbursement Disbursement
 

$805 $7

$1,538 $11 

$375 $70

$1,050 $5

$434 $21

$375 $300 

$335 $78

$350 $30 

$575 $74

$538 $13

$689 $14

$360 $50

$300 $218

17 
Agency/ 

Component 

Name 

AVG Yearly 

Amount Per 

Employee 

AVG Yearly 

Amount Per 

Child 

Highest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement 

Lowest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement 

Securities and 

Exchange $2,765 $2,304 $494 $34 

Commission 

Treasury - US 

BPD $1,189 $818 $307 $3 

Treasury - US 

Mint NA NA NA NA 

Treasury-IRSOffice of Chief $4,190 $3,428 $460 $50 

Counsel 

USDA - Farm 

Service Agency $1,312 $1,312 $430 $0 

USDA - Foreign 

Agricultural $948 $948 $716 $0 

Service 

USDA -

Research, 

Education & $2,217 $1,721 $500 $11 

Economics 

Veterans Affairs $1,443 $878 $600 $9 

18 
 

 

 

 

Note: This data form is for informational purposes 

Appendix F 

2010 Call for Child Care Subsidy Data 

OPM Form 1645 

1. Agency Name 

Agency Street Address 

Agency City Agency State Agency Zip Code 

2. Has your agency stopped offering a child care subsidy program since the last time you 

reported the data? 

□ Yes □ No 

Please explain 

0

3a. Income ceiling of the child care subsidy program in your agency $ 

3b. In the past fiscal year, has the income ceiling level changed? 

□ Increase □ Decrease □ No Change 

Results 

0 4a. Total agency population 

4b. Number of employees utilizing the child care subsidy 0 

program 

4c. The average total family income of employees in the child 0 $ care subsidy program 

0 4d. Total amount of funds disbursed this past fiscal year $ 

19
 
 

 

 

0 4e. Total of all employees' child care costs (pre-subsidy). $ 

4f. Number of children served by the child care subsidy 0 

program. 

0 4g. Lowest monthly employee disbursement $ 

0 4h. Highest monthly employee disbursement $ 

Types of Child Care Provider 

5. Total number 

Number of children in center based child care _ 

Number of children in family child care homes _ 

Program Administration 

6a. Did your agency administer the program? 

□ Yes □ No 

6b. Did your agency contract with another organization to administer the funds? 

□ Yes __□

□ No 

6c. Total cost to administer the program during the past fiscal year $_ 

7. If there have been any substantial changes in your child care subsidy program or if 

you have any additional comments, please provide below: 

_ 

Agency Certification 

8a. Name _ 

8b. Title _ 

20 
8c. Telephone number _ 

8e. Email _ 

8f. Date _ 

21 
United StateS
 

Office Of PerSOnnel ManageMent
 

Employee Services 

1900 E Street, NW 

Washington, DC 20415 

ES/AVS/WLW-02