alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT
REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported) July 20, 2007
 Cardtronics Inc.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    333-113470
(Commission File Number)
    
    76-0681190
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 3110 Hayes Road, Suite 300, Houston, Texas
    
    77082(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (281) 596-9988
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive AgreementItem 2.01. Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of AssetsItem 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a RegistrantItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREPurchase and Sale Agreement    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
  
 Item 2.01. Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets.
   Placement agreement.
 Vault Cash Agreement.
 
    
    the Company will pay a fee based on the total amount of vault cash outstanding at
any given time;
    
    at all times, legal and equitable title of the cash will be held by Wells Fargo,
and the Company will not have access or right to the cash; and
    
    Wells Fargo will have the right to demand the return of all or any portion of its
cash at any time upon the occurrence of certain events beyond the Companys control,
including certain bankruptcy events relating to Cardtronics or its subsidiaries, a
breach of the terms of the vault cash agreement, or in order to meet its operating
requirements, if necessary. However, Wells Fargo has agreed to take commercially
reasonable steps to eliminate its right to demand the return of such cash for
operating requirements by August 31, 2007.




---



##### Table of Contents



Wells Fargo has the right to terminate this agreement upon 180 days notice. This agreement
is expected to expire in July 2009, subject to automatic one-year renewals.
 
 Item 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant.
 Issuance of Senior Subordinated Notes
 1 4
   Credit Facility Amendment




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  7-Eleven Financial Services Business
 
  
   Cardtronics, Inc.
 
   10.1
    
    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2007, by and between
Cardtronics, LP and 7-Eleven, Inc.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  July 25,
2007
 CARDTRONICS, INC.(Registrant)/s/ J. CHRIS BREWSTERJ. Chris BrewsterChief Financial Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 10.1
    
    Purchase and Sale Agreement, dated as of July 20, 2007, by and between
Cardtronics, LP and 7-Eleven, Inc.
EX-33.19
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Document Custody
1015 10th Avenue Southeast
Minneapolis, MN 55414


ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE SERVICING CRITERIA


Management of the Document Custody Section of the Corporate Trust Services
division of Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the "Company") is
responsible for assessing compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in
Item 1122(d) of Regulation AB of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Management has determined that the servicing criteria are applicable in regard
to the servicing platform for the period as follows:

Platform:
Publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting required under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) residential mortgage-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities issued on or after January
1, 2006 for which the Company provides document custody services, excluding any
such securities issued by any agency or instrumentality of the U.S. government
(other than the Federal Deposit Insurance Company) or any government sponsored
entity (the "Platform").


Period:  As of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012 (the "Period").

Applicable Servicing Criteria:

The servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(4)(i) and
1122(d)(4)(ii), in regard to the activities performed by the Company with
respect to the Platform (the "Applicable Servicing Criteria"). Management of
the Company has determined that all other servicing criteria set forth in Item
1122(d) are not applicable to the Platform.


With respect to the Platform and the Period, the Company's management provides
the following assertion of compliance with respect to the Applicable Servicing
Criteria:

1. The Company's management is responsible for assessing the Company compliance
with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

2. The Company management has assessed the Company compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria. In performing this assessment, management used
the criteria set forth by the Securities and Exchange Commission in paragraph
(d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB.

3. Based on such assessment as of and for the Period, the Company has complied,
in all material respects with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an
attestation report with respect to management's assertion of compliance with the
Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Period.


WELLS FARGO BANK, National Association

By:    /s/ Shari Gillund
       Shari L. Gillund

Title: Senior Vice President

Dated: February 15, 2013


Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3453 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3453

To clarify the regulatory treatment of Federal Home Loan Bank products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 8, 2015

 Mr. David Scott of Georgia (for himself and Mr. Lucas) introduced the 
   following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Agriculture

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To clarify the regulatory treatment of Federal Home Loan Bank products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Home Loan Bank Product 
Act''.

SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK PRODUCTS.

    (a) Section 1a(2) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1a(2)) is 
amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) is the Federal Housing Finance Agency for any 
                Federal Home Loan Bank (as defined in section 2 of the 
                Federal Home Loan Bank Act).''.
    (b) Section 402(a) of the Legal Certainty for Bank Products Act of 
2000 (7 U.S.C. 27(a)) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' at the end of paragraph (6);
            (2) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (7) and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(8) any Federal Home Loan Bank (as defined in section 2 
        of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act).''.
                                 <all>
```
Attachment 1: Going Green – View Your FEHB Brochure Online or 

Contact Your Plan for a Paper Brochure 

Please remember that paper copies of health plan brochures will not be 

automatically mailed to Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program 

members. 

Health plan brochures are available online at www.opm.gov/FEHBbrochures/

or on your health plan’s website. Accessing brochures online will help to lower 

administrative costs and protect natural resources. 

Your FEHB health plan will contact you to offer the option of obtaining your 

2013 benefit brochure online or requesting a paper copy of the benefit brochure. 

If you did not previously request a paper copy of your health plan’s 

brochure, you will not automatically receive one. If you change plans, your 

new health plan will mail you a paper copy of its brochure. 

If you choose to review the online version of your plan’s benefit brochure, you 

will still receive the Open Season package your plan normally mails to you. This 

package will include an explanation of benefit changes and your new premium 

rate for 2013. 

Go to www.opm.gov/FEHBbrochures/ to view your FEHB health plan brochure 

and to get more information about our Going Green initiative.
# Official Journal C 179/21 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 179 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4821 July 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 179

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4821 July 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 179/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2005/C 179/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3895 — PHL/PEL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2005/C 179/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3648 — Gruner + Jahr/MPS) (1) | 3 |
| 2005/C 179/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3833 — 3i SGR/Giochi Preziosi) (1) | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 179/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2005/C 179/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.3895 — PHL/PEL) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2005/C 179/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3648 — Gruner + Jahr/MPS) (1)

3

2005/C 179/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3833 — 3i SGR/Giochi Preziosi) (1)

3

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 179/5 | Corrigendum to the invitation to tender NO-Oslo: regional air services (OJ C 166, 7.7.2005) | 4 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 179/5

Corrigendum to the invitation to tender NO-Oslo: regional air services (OJ C 166, 7.7.2005)

(OJ C 166, 7.7.2005)

4

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
2004 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-17-2004

In Re: Donald Short

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 03-2337

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2004 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"In Re: Donald Short " (2004). 2004 Decisions. Paper 700.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2004/700
1

 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-2337

 

IN RE: DONALD SHORT, SR., DEBTOR,

Appellant

v.

MARY M. SHORT, 

Appellee

____________

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

(D.C. Civ. No. 03-cv-00282) 

District Judge: Honorable Arthur J. Schwab 

Submitted Under Third Circuit L.A.R. 34.1(a)

May 11, 2004

Before: NYGAARD, McKEE, and WEIS, Circuit Judges.

(Filed: May 17, 2004)

____________

OPINION 

 

WEIS, Circuit Judge.

The appellant is the debtor in possession in a Chapter 13 proceeding. He

seeks to set aside the sale of realty owned by him and his wife as tenants by the entireties. 

The appellant’s unhappiness with the sale seemingly is caused by the bankruptcy judge’s
2

refusal to issue rulings on the validity of the option used to sell the property or the

applicability of a post-nuptial agreement. Apparently, these issues have some relationship

to the appellant’s divorce proceedings in Florida. 

No stay was secured before an appeal was taken to the District Court, which

dismissed the case as moot pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 363(m). Our explanation of the

mootness status of unstayed sales orders is set out in L.R.S.C. Co. v. Rickel Home

Centers, Inc. (In re Rickel Home Centers, Inc.), 209 F.3d 291 (3d Cir. 2000) and Krebs

Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. v. Valley Motors, Inc., 141 F.3d 490 (3d Cir. 1998). In Krebs,

we said, “there are two prerequisites for section 363(m) ‘statutory’ mootness: (1) the

underlying sale or lease was not stayed pending the appeal, and (2) the court, if reversing

or modifying the authorization to sell or lease, would be affecting the validity of such a

sale or lease.” Id. at 499. 

The case before us satisfies both requirements and accordingly, the appeal

will be dismissed.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

Nos. 98-30082 & 98-30083

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JAMES L. KNOX, JR.,

Defendant-Appellant.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JEFFREY LEE CONANT,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC Nos. 97-CR-50044-1 & 97-CR-50044-5

- - - - - - - - - -

October 15, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

In these consolidated appeals, James L. Knox, Jr., and

Jeffrey Lee Conant appeal, respectively, their sentences for

conspiracy to possess and possession with intent to distribute 
Nos. 98-30082 & 98-30083 

-2-

cocaine and for conspiracy to posses with intent to distribute

cocaine. Conant argues that the district court erred in refusing

to depart downwardly from the sentencing guidelines after the

Government refused to file a § 5K1.1 motion for a downward

departure based on substantial assistance. Because Conant has

not made a threshold showing of an unconstitutional motive, the

district court lacked the “authority to scrutinize the level of

[Conant’s] cooperation and interpose[] [its] own assessment of

its value.” United States v. Urbani, 967 F.2d 106, 109 (5th Cir.

1992).

Knox argues that the district court erred in increasing his

base offense level four points for being a leader or organizer

under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(a). The district court did not clearly

err in finding that Knox was an organizer or leader. United

States v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929, 944 (5th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.
Order entered June 8 , 2022

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 22

- 00174

- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.P., A CHILD
On Appeal from the 255th Judic ial District Court

Dallas C ounty, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF

- 16

- 17269

O RDER
The reporter’s record in this appeal is past due. By postcard dated April 6,
2022, we notified Latoya Young , Official Court Reporter for the 25 5 th Judicial
District Court, that the rep orter’s record wa s overdue and directed her to file the
reporter’s record within thirty days. To date, Ms. Young has failed to comply

with the Court’s order.
Accordingly, we ORDER LaToya Young to file, within F IFTEEN DAYS
of the date of this order, either (1) the repor ter’s record; (2) written verification no

hea r ings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant ha s not paid for or
made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and ha s not been found e nt itledto proceed without payment of c ost s. We not ify appellant that if we receive

verificatio n he has not requested the reporter’s record or paid for or made
arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and is not enti tled to proceed

withou t pay ment of costs
, we will order the appeal submitted without t he reporter’s

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37 .3(c).

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this o rder to:

Honorable Kim Cooks Presiding Judge 25 5 th Judicial Dis trict Court
LaToya Young Offi cial Court Reporter 25 5 th Judicial District Court
All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
##### 



Exhibit 10.18
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
(Elliott Kennedy)
 EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT Agreement Company Key
Employee Effective Date Financing provided
 W I
T N E S S E T H:
 WHEREAS,
 WHEREAS,
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATIONS
 1.1 Definitions .
 Base Salary Section 2.3(a)
 Board
 Cause
 Section 3.8
    1




---



##### 



Change in Control
 Section
1.1(d)(ii) provided further however Section
1.1(d)(i) Section 1.1(d)(i)
 Section 1.1(d)(ii) Section
1.1(d)(i)
  2




---



##### 



Section 1.1(d) provided Section 1.1(d) Majority Shareholder (y) (y)
 Code
 Disability Company Physician Key Employees Physician
 Good Reason
    Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Rules
 3




---



##### 



Protection Period
 Severance Pay
   Severance Period
   Without Cause
 1.2 Interpretations .
 ARTICLE II
EMPLOYMENT AND DUTIES
 2.1 Term . Initial Term Renewal Term
 2.2 Position, Duties and Services .
 4




---



##### 



2.3 Compensation .
 Base Salary
 Bonuses and Perquisites
 Incentive, Savings, Profit Sharing, and Retirement Plans
 Welfare Benefit Plans
 2.4 Severance Benefit . ARTICLE III Section 2.1 ARTICLE III
 ARTICLE III
EARLY TERMINATION
 3.1 Death . Section 2.3
 3.2 Disability . Section 2.1 Section 2.3
 3.3 Termination for Cause or Voluntary Resignation by Key Employee .
 5




---



##### 



Section 2.3
 3.4 Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason Unrelated to a Change in Control . Section 2.1 Section 2.3
 3.5 Termination Without Cause or for Good Reason Related to a Change in Control . Section 2.3
 3.6 Termination of Companys Obligations . ARTICLE III Section
3.8
 3.7 Release . Section 3.7 Section 3.4 Section 3.5 i.e Section
2.3
 3.8 Non-Competition, Confidentiality .
 Agreement not to Compete Section 3.8(b) Section
3.8(b) Section
3.8
 6




---



##### 



Confidential Information
 Reasonableness of Restrictions Section 3.8 Section 3.8 Section 3.8 Section 3.8
 7




---



##### 



Enforcement Successor Employer Section 3.8 Section 3.8 Section 3.8
 3.9 Parachute Payments . ARTICLE III Section 3.9
 3.10 Payments Subject to Section 409A of the Code . ARTICLE III ARTICLE III
 8




---



##### 



ARTICLE IV
MISCELLANEOUS
 4.1 Governing Law .
 4.2 Amendment and Waiver .
 4.3 Severability .
 4.4 Entire Agreement . Section 2.3(c) Section 2.3(d)
 4.5 Withholding of Taxes and Other Employee Deductions .
 4.6 Headings .
 4.7 Actions by the Board .
 4.8 Construction .
  9




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 COMPANY:

ORION MARINE GROUP, INC.By:

/s/
J. Michael PearsonName:
    J. Michael PearsonTitle:
    President and Chief Executive OfficerKEY EMPLOYEE:/s/
Elliott KennedyElliott Kennedy Signature Page to  Employment Agreement  (Elliott Kennedy)
(logo) NTS NATIONAL

TAX SEARCH, LLC

303 E Wacker Drive, Suite      900

Chicago, IL 60601

(312) 233-6440

 

 

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLESECURITIES AND

EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

 

 

For the calendar year ending December 31, 2015, NationalTax Search, LLC has been a Tax Service Vendor for **Wells Fargo Bank** (the"Servicer").

 

National Tax Search, LLC ("NTS") is responsible forassessing compliance as of December 31, 2015 and for the period from January 1,2015 through December 31, 2015 (the "Reporting Period") with the servicingcriteria set forth in Title 17, Section 229.1122(d) of the Code of FederalRegulations (the "CFR''). NTS has used the servicing criteria communicated toNTS by the Servicer to assess compliance with the applicable servicing criteria.Only servicing criteria 1122 (d) (l)(ii), 1122 (d)l(iv), 1122 (d)2(ii), 1122(d)2(v), 1122(d)2(vi), 1122 (d)2(vii), 1122(d)(4)(xi), and 1122(d)(4)(xii) (the"Applicable Servicing Criteria") are applicable to the activities NTS performswith respect to the transactions covered by this report. NTS has determined thatthe remaining servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122 (d) of the SECRegulation AB are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect tothe transactions covered by this report. The transactions covered by this reportinclude all tax payments made on behalf of the Servicer using NTS's TaxQ system(the "Platform Transactions").

 

NTS, as a vendor, has assessed its compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded thatthe NTS has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable ServicingCriteria as of December 31, 2015 and for the Reporting Period with respect tothe Platform Transactions taken as a whole.

 

Plante& Moran, PLLC, an independent registered publicaccounting firm, has issued an attestation report on 'theassessment of compliance with theApplicable Servicing Criteria as of December 31, 2015 and for theReporting Period as set forth in this assertion.

 

 

National Tax Search, LLC, as Vendor to Servicer

/s/ Lori D. Eshoo

Lori D. Eshoo, President/CEO

January 18, 2016
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  EXHIBIT 10 (r)

                                  AMENDMENT TO
                           CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT

         Amendment dated this 8th day of March, 1999 to Change in Control
Agreement ("Agreement"), dated the 14th day of September, 1998, between Prime
Hospitality Corp., a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and A. F. Petrocelli
("Employee").

         WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Agreement;

         The parties agree as follows:

         1.    The Agreement is hereby amended in the following respects:

               a.    Section 1(a), the definition "Cause" is deleted.

               b.    Section 1(c), the definition "Good Reason" is deleted.

               c.    Section 2(b) is to read as follows:

                     "(b) Cash Payment. If a Change in Control of the Company
               shall occur, then the Company shall, within ten (10) days of such
               event, pay to Employee, in one lump sum, in immediately available
               funds by wire transfer in accordance with Employee's
               instructions, an amount equal to two and one-half (2-1/2) times
               Employee's "Cash Compensation" as defined above."

               d.    Section 5 (Arbitration of Disputes) is amended by deleting
                     from the second sentence thereof the words "At any time
                     following the termination of Employee's employment with the
                     Company."

         2.    In all other respects, the Agreement as amended hereby shall
remain in full force and effect.



                                                  PRIME HOSPITALITY CORP.


                                                  By: /s/ JOSEPH BERNADINO
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                      Joseph Bernadino
                                                        Senior Vice President

                                                      /s/ A. F. PETROCELLI
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                      A. F. Petrocelli