alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### HOPPER v. STATE.

No. 18211.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1936.

B. G. Hackney, of Brownfield, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $200.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Iris BioTechnologies Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Simon Chin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2008 | By:    |
|------------------------------|--------|
|                         |   | /s/ Simon Chin |
|                         |   | Simon, Chin, President, Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J10004D0A Causal part name: ACCELERATOR PEDAL / SENSOR Causal part number: XR856965

Issued: 19 May 2010 Page 1 of 2 Code of Federal Regulations. Title 40. Part 85. Subpart T. §85.1903 - Emissions Defect Information Report
(c)(1) The manufacturers corporate name. Jaguar Cars Limited.
(c)(2) A description of the defect. S-type Jaguar vehicles displayed the check engine warning light and invoked limp-home mode. Jaguar dealer technicians found stored fault codes which lead them to replace defective accelerator pedal sensors. The replacement sensor resolved the issue.
(c)(3) A description of each class or category of vehicles potentially affected by the defect including make, model, model year, and such other information as may be required to identify these vehicles. See table in section (c)(4)(i) below. (c)(4) For each class or category of vehicle or engine desc ribed in response to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the following shall also be provided: (c)(4)(i) The number of vehicles or engines known or estimated to have the defect and an explanation of the means by which this number was determined.

MODEL YEAR TEST GROUP MODEL SALES DEFECTS 2006 6JCXV030DNK S-TYPE 3.0 5125 32 2007 7JCXV030DNK S-TYPE 3.0 1962 88 The above data was taken from Jaguar's warranty tracking report dated 2009 Q4.
(c)(4)(ii) The address of the plant at which the potentially defective vehicles or engines were produced. Jaguar Castle Bromwich Plant, Birmingham, England.
(c)(5) An evaluation of the emissions impact of the defect and a description of any driveability problems which a defective vehicle might exhibit. There is no adverse impact on emis sions associated with this issue. This defect invokes limp-home mode. This defect illuminates the M.I.L.Jaguar Cars Limited EMISSION DEFECT INFORMATION REPORT No. J10004D0A Causal part name: ACCELERATOR PEDAL / SENSOR Causal part number: XR856965

Issued: 19 May 2010 Page 2 of 2 (c)(6) Available emissions data which relate to the defect. There is no impact on emission s associated with this defect.
(c)(7) An indication of any an ticipated manufacturer follow-up. This issue is regarded as self campaigning, MIL illumination plus limp-home mode running will prompt drivers to return the vehicle to a Jaguar dealer for rectification.
Opinion issued June 6 , 2023

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 23
- 00234
- CV

——————————— RBHJ HO LDINGS, LLC , Appellant

V. FREEPOINT ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC , Appellee

O n Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harr is County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2022
- 31562

MEMORANDUM OPINION Appellant has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(c). Further, although appellant failed to include a certificate of conference in its motion, appellant’s motion includes a certificate of service, more than 10 days have passed since the2

motion was fi led, and no party has responded to the motion. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 10.1(a)(5), 10.3(a). Accordingly, we gran t the motion and dismiss the appeal

. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 42.1(a)(1). We dismiss all other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consist s of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris

.
Exhibit 31

 

SEMT 2012-4

 

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

 

I, Garnet W. Kanouse, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-4 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: CCoreLogic Solutions, LLC (“CoreLogic”), American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, “Assurant”), Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.

 

Date: March 27, 2020

 

 

/S/  Garnet W. Kanouse

Signature 

 

President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
WEST VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE

Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee

Senator Joseph Minard, Co-Chair

Delegate Bonnie Brown, Co-Chair

Debra A. Graham, Chief Counsel

Felisha N. Sutherland, Administrative Assistant

Rita A. Pauley, Associate Counsel

Brian Skinner, Associate Counsel

Charles Roskovensky, Associate Counsel

Jay Lazell, Associate Counsel

January 8, 2012

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN BY THE LEGISLATIVE RULE-MAKING REVIEW COMMITTEE

TO: Natalie E. Tennant, Secretary of State, State Register

TO: John A. Benedict, Director

DEP - Air Quality

601 57th Street, SE

Charleston, WV 25304

FROM: Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee

Proposed Rule: Permits for Construction and Major Modification of Major

Stationary Sources for the Prevention of Significant

Deterioration of Air, 45CSR14

The Legislative Rule-Making Review Committee Recommends that the West Virginia

Legislature:

1. Authorize the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule:

(A) as originally filed

(B) as modified by the agency

2. Authorize the agency to promulgate part of the Legislative rule;

a statement of reasons for such recommendation is attached.

3. Authorize the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule with

certain amendments; amendments and a statement of reasons for

such recommendation is attached.

4. Authorize the agency to promulgate the Legislative rule as

modified with certain amendments; amendments and a statement

of reasons for such recommendation is attached.

5. Recommends that the Legislature rule be withdrawn; a statement

of reasons for such recommendation is attached.

Building 1, Room MB-49 1900 Kanawha Boulevard, East Charleston, WV 25305

Phone: (304) 347-4840 Fax: (304) 347-4901 email: felisha.sutherland@wvlegislature.gov
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-2385

KENNETH SMITH,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Post Master General, United States Postal Service Agency,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:17-cv-01097-CMH-MSN)

Submitted: December 3, 2020 Decided: December 8, 2020

Before KEENAN, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Dennis Carl Barghaan, Jr., Assistant United States 

Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellee. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Smith appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to 

Defendant on Smith’s second amended complaint raising a variety of constitutional and 

employment discrimination and retaliation claims. We have reviewed the record and find 

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. Smith v. 

Brennan, No. 1:17-cv-01097-CMH-MSN (E.D. Va. Nov. 4, 2019). We deny Smith’s 

motion to strike the response brief, motion for a formal appeal, and motions to add exhibits. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 35.1



ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



This Compliance Certificate
is furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of July 19, 2012,
by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2012-B, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),
Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersigned
hereby certifies that:



1)	I am a duly authorized officer of the
Servicer.



2)	A review of the activities of the Servicer
from July 19, 2012 through December 31, 2012 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance under
the Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.



3)	Based on such review, the Servicer has,
to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Relevant
Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed
this Compliance Certificate this 28th day of March, 2013.





| |                                     
| | ------------------------------------
| | HYUNDAI CAPITAL AMERICA, as Servicer
| |                                     
| |                                     
| | By:                                 
| | Name:                               
| | Title:
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of DJO Finance LLC (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended October 2, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on November 4, 2010 (the “Report”), I,Vickie L. Capps, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                                    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  November 4, 2010                                     |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                             |   |
| /s/  VICKIE L. CAPPS                                             |   |
| Vickie  L. Capps                                                 |   |
| Executive  Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |

 

----
[No. 45166-9-I.

Division One.

December 4, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Robert Ramsey, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kang County, No. 99-8-04111-1, Marsha J. Pechman, J., entered August 16, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

JERIAH WOODY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1559

[ August 10, 2017 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for

the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Charles Burton , Judge;

L.T. Case No. 502010CF001246A

.

Jeriah Woody, Daytona Beach, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed

.

M AY

, F ORST and K LINGENSMITH , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
ex_100493.htm


Exhibit 10.6


 


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO


EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


 


This Amendment No. 1 (this "Amendment") to an Employment Agreement (the "Employment Agreement") entered as of November 9, 2012, by and between Accelerize Inc., a Delaware corporation with headquarters at 20411 SW Birch St. Ste. 250, Newport Beach, CA 92660 (the “Company”), and Damon Stein, a natural person, residing at 236 Mabery Road, Santa Monica, CA 90402 (the “Employee”), is entered as of this 9th day of November 2017. Each of the Company and the Employee may be referred to hereinafter as a "Party" and collectively, the "Parties".


 


WHEREAS, the Parties have entered the Employment Agreement as of November 9, 2012; and


 


WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to adjust the Term of the Agreement.


 


NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:


 


 


	 	
			1.

				
			Section 1 of the Employment Agreement is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following: 

			



 


1.   Term. The Company employs Employee, subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement, through the earlier of December 31, 2019 or such date as this Agreement shall terminate or expire as provided herein (the “Term”).


 


 


	 	
			2.

				
			All other terms and conditions of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

			



 


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed or caused to be executed this Agreement as of the date first above written.


 


 


 


EMPLOYEE:


 


 


 


  /s/ Damon Stein                                                                 


Damon Stein


 


 


 


 


ACCELERIZE INC.


 


 


 


By:      /s/ Brian Ross                                                        


Name: Brian Ross


Title: Chief Executive Officer
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128990 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 128990 

 COA: 260526 

Hillsdale CC: 03-280192-FH 

KEISHA DAWN JACKSON, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 26, 2005 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

p1024 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2005 

Clerk
ex_100367.htm


Exhibit 10.12


 


ACKNOWEDGMENT


OF


CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION


 


Amendment One


 


WHEREAS, On December 29, 2016, the Board of Directors of Prism Technologies Group, Inc. (the “Company”) approved a transaction by which Mr. Hussein A. Enan, the CEO and Chairman of the Company, provided the Company with $250,000 in cash.


 


WHEREAS, The Company and Mr. Enan desire to clarify certain terms of the capital contribution transaction.


 


The Company and Mr. Enan acknowledge and agree that this Amendment One replaces the Acknowledgment of Capital Contribution dated January 10, 2017 and the terms of the transaction are as follows:


 


	 	
			1)

				
			Mr. Enan is entitled to receive $625,000 when the Company’s cumulative Net Cash Flow (“NCF”) for the period beginning on January 1, 2017exceeds $7.5 million. NCF is measured as the cumulative cash received from patent litigation activities less all cumulative cash operating expenses incurred by the Company during the same period.

			



 


	 	
			2)

				
			The cash contribution is unsecured and non-convertible to equity.

			



 


	 	
			3)

				
			The Company received $250,000 from Mr. Enan on December 30, 2016.

			



 


	 	
			4)

				
			The Company may use the funds for working capital and general corporate operations.

			



 


 


	
			ACKNOWLEDGED:

				
			ACKNOWLEDGED:

			
	
			PRISM TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.

				
			HUSSEIN A. ENAN

			
	
			 


			BY: /s/ L. Eric Loewe

				
			BY: /s/ Hussein A. Enan, Trustee

			
	
			DATE: November 12, 2017

				
			DATE: November 13, 2017
ATTACHMENT 5 

TO 

BAL: FERS Credit for Certain Government Service 

Performed Abroad
(Federal Employees Retirement System)

INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT RECORD

Last Name First Name Middle Name

1.

2.

3.

4.

(RECORD EACH NAME CHANGE--STRIKE OUT PREVIOUS NAME)

Date of Birth

Month Day Year

Social Security Number

Agency Payroll Office Location Payroll Office No.

SERVICE HISTORY

Effective Date Action Base Pay Remarks

(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)

Year Salary

Deductions

Calendar Year Accumulated

Salary

Deductions

Remarks

FISCAL RECORD

Register of Separations Number (SF 3103)

U.S. Office of Personnel Management

5 CFR 841

NSN 7540-01-246-9251

3100-202 Standard Form 3100A January 1987

U.S. Office of Personnel Management

5 CFR 841

FERS
EX-10.1



 





EXHIBIT 10.01




AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE

AMENDED AND RESTATED MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC.

COMMON STOCK PURCHASE PLAN FOR DIRECTORS




     This Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Martin Marietta
Materials, Inc. Common Stock Purchase Plan for Directors, as previously amended
(the “Plan”) hereby makes the following amendment, effective as of August 17,
2004.



     Section 8(a) of the Plan is amended and restated as follows:



          “(a) General.
At each time payment of all or a portion of a Participant’s
Stock Deferral Account and/or Cash Deferral Account is due pursuant to an
election made in accordance with Section 5 (or pursuant to the death of a
Participant in accordance with Section 8(c)), the Company shall pay Stock and
cash directly to such Participant or his Beneficiary in an amount equal to the
portion of his Stock Deferral Account and/or Cash Deferral Account which is so
payable. Payable amounts expressed in the form of Stock Equivalents shall be
paid in Stock, and payable amounts expressed in the form of cash shall be paid
in cash. The Company shall make such payment directly to the Participant from
its general assets and authorized but unissued Stock; provided, however, that
in the event no authorized but unissued Stock is available, payable amounts
from a Participant’s Stock Deferral Account expressed in the form of Stock
Equivalents may be deferred for up to six months at the discretion of the
Committee pending the availability of such Stock.”



     All other terms and provisions of the Plan remain in full force and
effect.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6521

STACY W. HOWARD,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 versus

GEORGETOWN COUNTY GOVERNMENT BODY; CHARLES V.

PYLE; MALCOLM D. SHULER; BENJAMIN F. DUNN;

HUGHEY WALKER; ELERBEE ACKERMAN; ROBBIE

O’DONNELL; LANE CRIBB, Sheriff; DAN FURR; AL

WILLIAMS, Chief; JOHN HILLIARD; G. TURNER

PERROW; JOE CROSBY; MIKE SWARTZ; CHUCK KOSIS;

KENNETH OWENS, Captain; GEORGETOWN COUNTY

SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT; MUNICIPAL CORPORATION;

SOLICITORS OFFICE; TOWNSHIPS IN GEORGETOWN

COUNTY; ADMINISTRATION OF GOVERNMENT FOR

GEORGETOWN COUNTY, including government body

and political subdivisions; OTHERS AS YET

UNKNOWN,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-04-36-6-13AK)

Submitted: August 26, 2004 Decided: September 1, 2004

Before WIDENER and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
- 2 -

Stacy W. Howard, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Stacy W. Howard appeals the district court’s order,

accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying relief

on Howard’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. See Howard v.

Georgetown County Gov’t, No. CA-04-36-6-13AK (D.S.C. Feb. 19,

2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
## Martin, Michael 

## (OST) Subject: 

### FW: Kingman community comments?



### From: John Salem [mailto:jsalem@cityofkingman.gov] 

### Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 4:49 PM To: Martin, Michael (OST) Cc: Jack Kramer; Dave French 

### Subject: RE: Kingman community comments?

310 N Fourth Street 1Kingman; AZ 86401 1(928) 753-5561 I'm sorryforthe delay. This must have slipped through myfingers at some point. Iwill recommend Great Lakes Airlines forthe EAS renewal. Everyone that I have spoken to as a passenger orthose that are part ofairportstaffhave all agreed. Their planes are clean and well kept. The Beech 1900 has served us well. The airline crews are very courteous, professional and knowledgable. Thank you again for soliciting my input. Sincerely,



### John Salem Mayor- City of Kingman 310 N Fourth St- Kingman, Al86401 Office: (928) 753-8102 Email: jsalem@cityofkingman.gov Web: htto://www.cjtyofkingman.gov

1