alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 99-418 Date: December 9, 1999 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Premium Rate Change

for CHP of Ohio, Enrollment Code MG

This is to advise you that due to a re-negotiation of premiums for CHP of Ohio, enrollment code

MG, the rates published in the 1999 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Guide are

incorrect. Listed below are the new rates for the plan.

Guide Pay Period Self Only Self /Family

RI 70-1 Biweekly 21.79 46.37

 

Employees

Monthly 47.21 100.46

RI 70-2 Postal Postal A 9.81 20.87

Employees

Postal B 9.81 20.87

RI 70-5 TCC 102 % 192.63 409.89

Spouse Equity 100 % 188.85 401.85

RI 70-6 OWCP Twice Biweekly 43.58 92.74

RI 70-8 Temporary Biweekly 87.16 185.47

Employees Monthly 188.85 401.85

________________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System
2

Pay Period Government

Contributions

Enrollee Total

Biweekly (Self Only) 65.37 21.79 87.16

Biweekly (Self and Family) 139.10 46.37 185.47

Monthly (Self Only) 141.64 47.21 188.85

Monthly (Self and Family) 301.39 100.46 401.85

Agencies are asked to advise their employees of this change.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division
Exhibit 32.2
 Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer  Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  (a)
    
    the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report)
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and(b)
    
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.
 By:

/s/ Weston M. AndressWeston M. AndressPresident and Chief
Financial Officer ofColonial Properties Trust, the general partnerof Colonial Realty Limited Partnership  52
POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The  undersigned  director(s)  of  Portland General Corporation hereby
appoint(s) Alvin Alexanderson, Joseph M.  Hirko  and  Joseph  E. Feltz, and
each of them generally, as the attorney-in-fact, in any and all  capacities
stated herein, to execute on behalf of the undersigned and to file with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission under the Securities Exchange Act  of
1934, as amended, the Portland  General  Corporation  Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.


Dated:  JANUARY 28, 1997
        Carefree, Arizona



 /S/ GWYNETH GAMBLE BOOTH                /S/ KEN L. HARRISON        
Gwyneth Gamble Booth                     Ken L. Harrison

___________________________              /S/ JERRY E. HUDSON
Peter J. Brix                            Jerry E. Hudson

 /S/ CAROLYN S. CHAMBERS                 /S/ JEROME J. MEYER
Carolyn S. Chambers                      Jerome J. Meyer

 /S/ JOHN W. CREIGHTON, JR.              /S/ RANDOLPH L. MILLER
John W. Creighton, Jr.                   Randolph L. Miller

 /S/ RICHARD GEARY                       /S/ BRUCE G. WILLISON
Richard Geary                            Bruce G. Willison


                              <PAGE>




                             POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The  undersigned  director(s)  of  Portland  General Electric  Company
hereby appoint(s) Alvin Alexanderson, Joseph M. Hirko  and Joseph E. Feltz,
and  each  of  them  generally,  as the attorney-in-fact, in  any  and  all
capacities stated herein, to execute  on  behalf  of the undersigned and to
file  with  the  Securities  and Exchange Commission under  the  Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,  the  Portland  General  Electric Company
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996.


Dated: JANUARY 28, 1997
       Carefree, Arizona


 /S/ GWYNETH GAMBLE BOOTH                  /S/  KEN  L.  HARRISON
Gwyneth Gamble Booth                       Ken L. Harrison

____________________________                /S/ JERRY E. HUDSON
Peter J. Brix                              Jerry E. Hudson

 /S/  CAROLYN  S. CHAMBERS                 /S/  JEROME  J.  MEYER
Carolyn S. Chambers                        Jerome J. Meyer

 /S/ JOHN W. CREIGHTON,  JR.               /S/  RANDOLPH L. MILLER
John W. Creighton, Jr.                     Randolph L. Miller

 /S/ RICHARD GEARY                         /S/ BRUCE G. WILLISON
Richard Geary                              Bruce G. Willison

                                  <PAGE>
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dolan Media Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for thequarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Scott J. Pollei, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, tomy knowledge:1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.        Date: September 14, 2007 By:  /s/ Scott J. Pollei    Scott J. Pollei    Chief Financial Officer
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. PD-1656-13

LARRY JORDAN, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

FROM THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery and sentenced to 12 years in prison.

On appeal, he argued that the evidence was insufficient to support the $299 in court costs

assessed against him in the judgment. The Court of Appeals agreed, relying on its own

opinion in Johnson v. State, 389 S.W.3d 513 (Tex. App. – Houston [14 Dist.] 2012).

th
JORDAN - 2

Jordan v. State, No. 14-12-00970-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14010 (Tex. App. – Houston

[14 Dist.] November 14, 2013) (not designated for publication).

th

The State has filed a petition for discretionary review of this decision. We recently

handed down our opinion in Johnson v. State, No. PD-0193-13, 2014 Tex. Crim. App.

LEXIS 240 (Tex. Crim. App. February 26, 2014), in which we set forth a roadmap for

resolving questionsregarding court costs. See also Cardenas v. State, No. PD-0733-13, 2014

Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 236 (Tex. Crim. App. February 26, 2014).

The Court of Appeals in the instant case did not have the benefit of our opinion in

Johnson. Accordingly, we grant the State’s petition for discretionary review, vacate the

judgment of the Court of Appeals, and remand this case to the Court of Appeals in light of

our opinion in Johnson. No motion for rehearing will be entertained.

Delivered: April 16, 2014

Do Not Publish
EXHIBIT  32.2






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of ENHANCE SKIN PRODUCTS INC. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended October 31, 2009, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian Lukian, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C. 1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








By:
/s/ Brian LukianDate: April 6, 2010

Brian LukianChief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 5.1




---



##### 



(i)
    
    the registration statement on Form S-4 of the Issuer, filed with the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission (the SEC) to register the Exchange Notes (the Registration
Statement); and(ii)
    
    the Indenture.




---



##### 



1.
    
    The Guarantor has the necessary corporate power and authority to enter into and perform its
obligations under the Guarantee. The execution and delivery of the Indenture by the Guarantor
and the performance by the Guarantor of its obligations under the Guarantee will not violate
the memorandum of association or bye-laws of the Guarantor nor any applicable law, regulation,
order or decree in Bermuda.2.
    
    The Guarantor has taken all corporate action required to authorise its execution and delivery
of the Indenture and its performance of the Guarantee.
    CONYERS DILL & PEARMAN
CWCapital
Asset Management(logo)



Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2017 to December
31, 2017



UBS 2012-C2



In accordance
with Item 1123 of Regulation AB andwith the requirements detailed in §10.11 of thePooling and Servicing Agreement
(the “Agreement”) for the above-mentioned CMBS pool,(the “CMBS Pool”), CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer, is providing
this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the
“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s supervision
and;
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled
all its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
us.



Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC



/s/ David B. Iannarone

David B. Iannarone

President



7501 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 500 West, Bethesda, MD 20814

www.cwcapital.com
[Nos. 18502-8-III; 18721-7-III.

Division Three.

October 26, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage*of Cathleen D. Hirschberger, *Appellant,*and Larry Hirschberger, *Respondent. In the Matter of the Marriage of*Cathleen D. Hirschberger, *Respondent,*and Larry Hirschberger, *Appellant.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Lincoln County, No. 97-3-02991-5, Philip W. Borst, J., entered May 18, 1999 and August 31, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Schultheis, J.
Stephen Thomas and Svetlana Thomas

GeoDrone Robotics, LLC

4301 Stretton Farm Ct.

Woodbridge, VA 22192

571.499.0177

703.862.8191

geodroneint@outlook.com

Nov. 21, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Docket FAA 2015-2005, Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 12221

Dear Sir/Madam,

GeoDrone Robotics, LLC. (GDR), received FAA Exemption No. 12221 on July 29, 2015 authorizing GDR under 

section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 to operate its unmanned aircraft system (UAS), the 

DJI Inspire 1, for various commercial purposes. In this petition for an amendment to Exemption No. 12221, GDR 

requests to operate two additional UAS’s for the same purposes. The two UAS’s are the DJI Phantom 3 

Professional and the Parrot Bebop 2.

The Phantom 3 Professional version that GDR has acquired has a maximum takeoff weight of 2.8 lbs. and carries a

wide field of view 4K visible camera. The Parrot Bebop 2 is a very small UAS that has a takeoff weight of around 1

lbs. and utilizes advanced avionics and computer controlled navigation. These drones operate at or beyond the 

operational parameters of our current UAS, the DJI Inspire 1.

These drones offer exceptional flight safety characteristics and will be operated utilizing the same safety 

procedures that GDR currently performs when operating the DJI Inspire 1.

GDR will comply with all of the conditions and limitations imposed in Exemption 12221 except that 

condition/limitation number 1 will need to be revised to include the DJI Phantom 3 Professional and the Parrot 

Bebop 2 UAS’s. The list of “operating documents” will also need to be revised to include operating manuals for 

both of these UAS’s. Due to file sizes, these documents can be provided separately or by hyperlink if requested by 

the FAA. Other than these revisions, there will be no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public safety 

that were the basis for the initial grant of exemption.

Because the requested amendment would not set any precedent or otherwise raise any new issues, GDR 

respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to grant the requested amendment by summary 

means.

Sincerely,

Stephen Thomas (CEO)
# Official Journal L 138/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 138 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6422 April 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 138

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6422 April 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/653 of 20 April 2021 amending Decision 2011/163/EU on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Article 29 of Council Directive 96/23/EC
  (notified under document C(2021) 2587)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2021/653 of 20 April 2021 amending Decision 2011/163/EU on the approval of plans submitted by third countries in accordance with Article 29 of Council Directive 96/23/EC
  (notified under document C(2021) 2587)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2021) 2587)

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Jose MENDOJA v. STATE.

No. 20246.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 7, 1938.

Ed Gunn, of Rockdale, for appellant

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of marihuana, a narcotic drug; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Upon the written request of the appellant, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A (the “Report”) of Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the fiscal quarter ended June 28, 2015, I, T. Michael Ansley, Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  October 28, 2015DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.By:/s/ T. Michael AnsleyT. Michael AnsleyChairman of the Board, President, andChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the quarterly report of Verso Paper Holdings LLC (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009 (the Report),
I, Michael A. Jackson, certify that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 14, 2009



/s/ Michael A. JacksonMichael A. Jackson President and Chief Executive Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79683]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22329]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12557]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Caspar David Friedrich: The 
Soul of Nature'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Caspar David Friedrich: The Soul 
of Nature'' at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and 
at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is 
of cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition 
or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the 
national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these 
determinations be published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5f2c3a3c2b3630316d6b6a661f2c2b3e2b3a71383029"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a9dacccaddc0c6c79b9d9c90e9daddc8ddcc87cec6df">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Scott D. Weinhold,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural 
Affairs, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of 
State.
[FR Doc. 2024-22329 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



Exhibit 23.1
 
  
    Very truly yours,/s/ DeGolyer and MacNaughtonDeGOLYER and MacNAUGHTON
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 358 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-707, CP2024-716.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22648 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### UNITED STATES NAVY

- MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Before

J. R. MCFARLANE, M.C. HOLIFIELD, K.J. BRUBAKER

Appellate Military Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

RYAN R. MCINTOSH

CORPORAL (E

- 4), U.S. MARINE CORPS

NMCCA 2 01400331

SPECIAL COURT

- MARTIAL

**Sentence Adjudged:** 6 June 2014

. **Military Judge:** Col D.M. McConnell, USMC

. **Convening Authority:** Commanding Officer, Marine Aviation

Logistics Squadron 14, MAG 14, 2d MAW, Cherry Point, NC

. **Staff Judge Advocate's Recommen dation:**  LtCol J.J. Murphy , USMC

. **For Appellant:** Maj Emmett S. Collazo, USMCR.

**For Appellee:** Mr. Brian K. Keller , Esq

.

**2 6**  **November 2014**

**---------------------------------------------------**

**OPINION OF THE COURT**

**---------------------------------------- -----------** 

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without

assignment of error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved

by the convening authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military

Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c).

For t he Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court