alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant To

18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,

as Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection
with the Quarterly Report of Cypress Sharpridge Investments, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
I, Frances Spark, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date October 22, 2009



/s/    FRANCES SPARKFrances Spark Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Nurse Solutions,Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-QSB for the quarterending March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the"Report"), I, Tomasz Zurawek, President/CEO/CFO of the Company, certify,pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section1350), that to my knowledge: 

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements ofsection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations ofthe Company. 

 

 

***/s/ Tomasz Zurawek                           ***

Tomasz Zurawek, President, CEO, CFO

Dated: July 20, 2007
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80906]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22890]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Board of 
Scientific Counselors, NIDDK, October 12, 2023, 10:00 a.m. to October 
13, 2023, 05:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Drive, 
Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the Federal Register on 
August 21, 2023, 88 FR 56846.
    The following FRN is being amended to change the meeting format 
from virtual to in person. The meeting is partially Closed to the 
public.

    Dated: September 30, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-22890 Filed 10-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### LARKIN v. STATE.

No. 24182.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 1, 1948.

No> appearance for appellant.

Ernest S. Goens, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for the murder of Lewis W. Chamberlain, punishment assessed at death.

The record contains neither exceptions to the court’s charge nor bills of exception, nor special requested charges. The facts not only establish the guilt of accused, but show a premeditated, most brutal, and dastardly killing, without justification, or any mitigating circumstances whatever, and warranted the jury in assessing the extreme penalty.

Appellant is a Negro, as was also the deceased, who was the owner of an automobile. In preparation for the killing appellant on several occasions a few days *339before the killing had approached different people in an effort to secure a pistol. On Sunday afternoon he succeeded in borrowing one. On Monday morning, about .three o’clock, he went to deceased’s home, waked him -up and requested him to take appellant somewhere in deceased’s car, saying he would tell him where after they were on the way. They drove out on the road some distance from Marshall, at which point appellant shot deceased three times, 'and then bashed -his head in with the butt o.f the pistol. Appellant possessed himself of the title papers of the -automobile and stuffed deceased’s body under a bridge. Appellant then returned to Marshall, picked up his wife, a friend and'his wife, and drove to Dallas where he • sold the car for $750, forging the name of the dead man to the transfer of title. Appellant divided the money with his 'companions and they spent the most of it in Dallas frolicking, and in the purchase of clothes, etc., after which they returned to Marshall by bus. The body of deceased was discovered. Investigation by the officers revealed the foregoing facts, which were developed on the trial.

Any verdict other than one assessing the death penalty would have failed to meet the just demands of the law.

The judgment is affirmed..
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2891 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2891

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to inflation adjust the 
 $5,000 limitation with respect to dependent care assistance programs 
                  and flexible spending arrangements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 25, 2015

Mr. Moolenaar introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to inflation adjust the 
 $5,000 limitation with respect to dependent care assistance programs 
                  and flexible spending arrangements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INFLATION ADJUSTMENT FOR DEPENDENT CARE ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS 
              AND FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 129(a)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
                    ``(D) Inflation adjustment.--In the case of any 
                taxable year beginning after December 31, 2015, the 
                dollar amounts in subparagraph (A) shall be increased 
                by an amount equal to--
                            ``(i) such amount, multiplied by
                            ``(ii) the cost-of-living adjustment 
                        determined under section 1(f)(3) for the 
                        calendar year in which such taxable year begins 
                        by substituting `calendar year 2014' for 
                        `calendar year 1992' in subparagraph (B) 
                        thereof.
                If any increase determined under this paragraph is not 
                a multiple of $50, such increase shall be rounded to 
                the next lowest multiple of $50.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 23.1





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File No. 33-46711) of our reports datedAugust 23, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule of National Presto Industries, Inc., management's assessment of the effectiveness and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (which report expresses an unqualified opinion on management's assessment and includes an explanatory paragraph to fairly present the nature of the material weakness and contains an adverse opinion on internal control over financial reporting due to the material weakness identified), which appears on page F.21 and 16 of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.





/s/ VIRCHOW, KRAUSE & COMPANY, LLP





Minneapolis, Minnesota

August 23, 2007



---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Abington Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, (the “Report”) as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission, I, Robert W. White, Chairman, President
      and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:







(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








/s/
                Robert W. WhiteRobert
                W. WhiteChairman,
                President andChief
                Executive OfficerAugust
                9, 2007





*A
      signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been provided to Abington Bancorp, Inc. and will be
      retained by Abington Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.*
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number 16 - 102 Date: 11-14-2016

Subject: OPM No Longer Accepting Corrections on Certain Benefits Election 

Forms

Background 

A number of retirement packages have been received by the Office of Personnel 

Management (OPM) that contain corrections on certain benefits election forms. In some 

cases it is impossible to tell if these corrections are valid. 

Guidance 

Effective immediately, we will not accept corrections (scratch-outs, white- outs, lineouts, or any other type of correction actions) in the named Sections on the following 

forms. New forms must be completed in lieu of any alterations to previously entered 

information. 

Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) Forms

• CSRS Immediate Retirement Application, SF 2801: Section F- Annuity Election 

• CSRS Immediate Retirement Application, SF 2801-2: Spouse’s Consent to 

Survivor Election 

• CSRS Deferred Application OPM Form 1496A: Section C- Annuity Election 

• CSRS Deferred Application OPM Form 1496A: Schedule A- Election of Former 

Spouse Survivor Annuity or Combination Current/Former Spouse Annuity 

• CSRS Deferred Application OPM Form 1496A: Schedule B- Spouse’s Consent to 

Survivor Election 

• Designation of Beneficiary SF 2808 (CSRS) Sections B and C 
 Retirement Services

Quality Benefits for the Federal Family

2 

Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS) Forms 

• FERS Immediate Retirement Application, SF 3107: Section D- Annuity Election; 

• FERS Immediate Retirement Application, SF 3107-2: Spouse’s Consent to 

Survivor Election 

• Application for Deferred/Postponed Retirement FERS, RI 92-19: Section FAnnuity Election 

• Application for Deferred/Postponed Retirement FERS, RI 92-19: Schedule ASpouse’s Consent to Survivor Election 

• Designation of Beneficiary SF 3102 (FERS): Sections B and C 

Federal Employees Group Life Insurance Forms

• Continuation of Life Insurance Coverage (SF 2818): Items 7-14 

• Designation of Beneficiary for FEGLI (SF 2823): Sections B, C, and D 

Please be advised that these procedural changes are effective immediately as of the date 

of publication of this BAL. If you send in any of the above forms with corrections, OPM 

will contact you or the retiree for a completed form containing no correction. 

The information in BAL 12-102 “Acceptance of Photocopies of Signed Documents in 

Retirement Application Packages and other Agency Submissions” remains OPM’s 

current guidance regarding photocopies and scans. 

These changes will also be reflected in the agency audit effective two months from the 

publication of this BAL. After that date, retirement packages received with corrections to 

the aforementioned forms will result in the agency being charged an error. 

 Kenneth J. Zawodny, Jr. 

 Associate Director 

Retirement Services
**Exhibit
      32.2**


**Certification
      of Principal Financial Officer**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June
      30,
      2008 (the “Report”) of United States Gasoline Fund, LP (the “Registrant”), as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Howard
      Mah, the Chief Financial Officer of United States Commodity Funds LLC, the
      General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Registrant.







Date:August
                13, 2008
            By:/s/
                Howard MahName:
                Howard Mah
              Title:  
                Chief Financial Officer
              United
                States Commodity Funds LLC,
              General
                Partner of United States Gasoline Fund,
                LP
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the annual report of Nacel Energy Corporation (the "Company") on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ending December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paul Turner, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.





/s/ Paul TurnerPaul
      TurnerChief
      Executive OfficerFebruary
      12, 2010
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2012-4

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-4 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer,
and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.



|                        
|------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2018    
|                        
|/s/ Christopher J. Abate
|Signature               

Chairman of the Board and President

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.3
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF ACCOUNTING OFFICER
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.Date: November 9, 2007
 /s/ Lloyd V. DeLanoLloyd V. DeLanoChief Accounting Officer 44
|   |   Prudential Asset Resources Prudential Mortgage Capital Company2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500, Dallas TX 75201Tel 214 777-4500 A business of Prudential Financial, Inc. |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| RE:  | Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through, WFRBS 2012-C8Period:   January 1, 2013 to December 31, 2013 |
|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   |                             |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------|
|   |   |                             |   |
|   |   | /s/ Hal Collett             |   |
|   |   | Hal Collett                 |   |
|   |   | President and Managing Director  |   |
|   |   | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. |   |
Exhibit 10.3


 


Fiscal
Year 2018 Officer Bonus Plan


 


The
Personnel and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of Electromed, Inc. (the “Company”) has established
the Fiscal Year 2018 Officer Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”) for officers of the Company, including its named executive
officers. The Bonus Plan is effective for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2018 and provides an opportunity for each participant
to earn an annual cash bonus based on Company revenue growth versus the fiscal year ended June 30, 2017 (subject to achievement
of threshold earnings before interest and taxes (“EBIT”)). The committee has established target payouts of 50.0% and
30.0% of annual base salary for our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, under the Bonus Plan. The
following summarizes the potential payments under the Bonus Plan:


 


		●	Company
                                         revenue growth below minimum performance will not result in any payouts under the Bonus
                                         Plan.



 


		●	Company
                                         revenue growth between minimum and target performance will result in a potential bonus
                                         payout starting at 12.5% and increasing in increments of 17.5% of the participant’s
                                         respective target payout for every whole percent of revenue growth in excess of minimum
                                         performance.



 


		●	Company
                                         revenue growth equal to target performance will result in a potential bonus payout equal
                                         to 100.0% of the participant’s respective target payout.



 


		●	Company
                                         revenue growth above target performance will result a potential bonus payout equal to
                                         100.0% of the participant’s respective target payout, plus an additional increment
                                         of 5.0% of their target payout for every whole percent of revenue growth in excess of
                                         target performance.



 


Notwithstanding
the foregoing, Company revenue growth also will not result in any payout unless EBIT also exceeds an established threshold amount.
Company revenue growth above target performance will only increase the resulting payout as a percent of target if EBIT also exceeds
an amount equal to the threshold EBIT amount plus an additional increment of 30.0% of threshold EBIT for every whole percent of
revenue growth in excess of target performance.
# EUR-Lex - 11957A180 - EN

Avis juridique important

*|*

# 11957A180

**TREATY ESTABLISHING THE EUROPEAN ATOMIC ENERGY COMMUNITY ( E.A.E.C. - EURATOM ), TITLE FOUR - FINANCIAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 180 **

*

*

++++

ARTICLE 180

THE ACCOUNTS OF ALL REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE SHOWN IN EACH BUDGET SHALL BE EXAMINED BY AN AUDIT BOARD CONSISTING OF AUDITORS WHOSE INDEPENDENCE IS BEYOND DOUBT , ONE OF WHOM SHALL BE CHAIRMAN . THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY , DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF THE AUDITORS . THE AUDITORS AND THE CHAIRMAN OF THE AUDIT BOARD SHALL BE APPOINTED BY THE COUNCIL , ACTING UNANIMOUSLY , FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS . THEIR REMUNERATION SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE COUNCIL , ACTING BY A QUALIFIED MAJORITY .

THE PURPOSE OF THE AUDIT , WHICH SHALL BE BASED ON RECORDS AND , IF NECESSARY , PERFORMED ON THE SPOT , SHALL BE TO ESTABLISH THAT ALL REVENUE HAS BEEN RECEIVED AND ALL EXPENDITURE INCURRED IN A LAWFUL AND REGULAR MANNER AND THAT THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT HAS BEEN SOUND . AFTER THE CLOSE OF EACH FINANCIAL YEAR , THE AUDIT BOARD SHALL DRAW UP A REPORT , WHICH SHALL BE ADOPTED BY A MAJORITY OF ITS MEMBERS .

THE COMMISSION SHALL SUBMIT ANNUALLY TO THE COUNCIL AND TO THE ASSEMBLY THE ACCOUNTS OF THE PRECEDING FINANCIAL YEAR RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EACH BUDGET , TOGETHER WITH THE REPORT OF THE AUDIT BOARD . THE COMMISSION SHALL ALSO FORWARD TO THEM A FINANCIAL STATEMENT SHOWING THE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES OF THE COMMUNITY .

THE COUNCIL SHALL , ACTING BY QUALIFIED MAJORITY , GIVE A DISCHARGE TO THE COMMISSION IN RESPECT OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EACH BUDGET . IT SHALL COMMUNICATE ITS DECISION TO THE ASSEMBLY .