alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### In the Matter of the Construction of the Will of Mary E. Jones, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County,

May 2, 1958.

*885
      *Lieberman é Rubinovitz*for petitioner.

*Brennan Gibson é Korshin*for Theodore B. Klapper and others.

*Holtzmann Wise $ Shepard*for Woolsey A. Shepard and others.

John D. Bennett, S.

The respondents move pursuant to subdivisions 1, 4 and 6 of rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice to dismiss the instant proceeding to construe the will. The motion centers about the effect of a decree and a release each dated June 15, 1955 which involved a compromise of claims in this estate and the estate of a deceased fiduciary.

In discussing the compromise submitted at that time which led to the decree above referred to, this court said in a decision dated May 27, 1955: “Mary E. Jones died in 1918 and her will was probated in that year. For nearly forty years this estate has been the subject of a constant series of bitter disputes which have been litigated in this court, the Supreme Court and the Appellate Courts of this State. The frequency of such litigation is indicated by the observation of Surrogate Howell in a memorandum dated December 9, 1948 in which he observes that matters in this estate appeared upon his calendar 27 days during 1947,17 days during 1948 prior to November 1st thereof. Two different removal proceedings were brought ag*ainst Bosalie Jones in her fiduciary capacity, the second of which was successful. Since her removal in a fiduciary capacity, there has been extensive litigation by and against Miss Bosalie Jones as an individual. Miss Louise E. Jones, once a co-fiduciary with her sister, Miss Bosalie Jones, died in or about 1952 and her estate is now involved in the problem of possible surcharge.

‘ ‘ At long last there appears to be some hope of a disposition of tírese various controversies and an orderly liquidation of what remains of this estate.”

It is quite apparent from the institution of the instant proceeding and the motions here involved that the “ Jones estate ” is reluctant to relegate itself to the inactive files. Despite the form of the instant proceeding, the question really at issue is whether or not in 1955, all questions were finally determined between the parties.

The court will take testimony on May 15, 1958 at 10:00 a.m., as to whether ‘ ‘ the broad, all inclusive language ’ ’ of the release dated June 15, 1955 was a result of “inadvertence, accident, mutual mistake or fraud ” *(Lucio*v. *Curran,*2 N Y 2d 157,161).

*886The determination of the motion will be held in abeyance pending that hearing.

If the parties so desire, an order to this effect may be settled on five days ’ notice.
BIM
Homes, Inc.


Condensed
Balance Sheet 


 


	 	 	Notes	 	Pro
        Forma as at

        June 30, 2017

        (Unaudited)
	 	 	As
        at 

        December
        31, 2016
	 
	ASSETS	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Current
    assets	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Cash
    and cash equivalents	 	2	 	$	-	 	 	$	-	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Total
    current assets	 	 	 	 	-	 	 	 	-	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Intangible
    assets	 	 	 	 	2,100,000,000	 	 	 	-	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOTAL
    ASSETS	 	 	 	$	2,100,000,000	 	 	$	-	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	LIABILITIES
    AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Current
    liabilities	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Accounts
    payable, trade	 	 	 	$	13,107	 	 	$	17,115	 
	Accrued
    expenses and other current liabilities	 	 	 	 	2,100	 	 	 	9,529	 
	Loans
    and convertible notes payable, short-term, net of unamortized debt discount of $34,452 and $84,000, respectively.	 	6	 	 	73,415	 	 	 	17,867	 
	Advance
    from related parties	 	8	 	 	19,180	 	 	 	-	 
	Derivative
    liability	 	7	 	 	330,422	 	 	 	332,249	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Total
    current liabilities	 	 	 	 	438,224	 	 	 	376,760	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOTAL
    LIABILITIES	 	 	 	 	438,224	 	 	 	376,760	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	STOCKHOLDERS’
    DEFICIT	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Preferred
    stock: $0.0001 par value, 20,000,000 shares authorized, nil shares issued and outstanding as at June 30, 2017 and December
    31, 2016	 	5	 	 	-	 	 	 	-	 
	Common
    stock: $0.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, 212,634,165 shares and 2,634,165 issued and outstanding as at June
    30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 respectively	 	5	 	 	21,264	 	 	 	264	 
	Additional
    paid-in capital	 	 	 	 	2,100,034,464	 	 	 	55,464	 
	Accumulated
    deficit	 	 	 	 	(493,952	)	 	 	(432,488	)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOTAL
    STOCKHOLDER’S DEFICIT	 	 	 	 	2,099,561,776	 	 	 	(376,760	)
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	TOTAL
    LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	 	 	 	$	2,100,000,000	 	 	$	-
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 31 

To prohibit the use of funds to implement the immigration policies set 

forth in the memoranda issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security 

on November 20, 2014, or the memoranda issued by the President 

on November 21, 2014, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 6, 2015 

Mrs. ROBY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each 

case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 

the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit the use of funds to implement the immigration 

policies set forth in the memoranda issued by the Secretary of Homeland Security on November 20, 2014, 

or the memoranda issued by the President on November 

21, 2014, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prevention of Execu5 tive Amnesty Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 31 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON USE OF FUNDS. 

2 None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made 

3 available, including any funds or fees collected or other4 wise made available for expenditure, by any Act, or other5 wise available to the Secretary of Homeland Security, for 

6 any fiscal year may be used to implement, administer, 

7 carry out, or enforce the policies in any of the following: 

8 (1) The memoranda issued by the Secretary of 

9 Homeland Security on November 20, 2014, on any 

10 of the following subjects: 

11 (A) Southern border and approaches cam12 paign. 

13 (B) Policies for the apprehension, deten14 tion, and removal of undocumented immigrants. 

15 (C) Secure Communities. 

16 (D) Personnel reform for Immigration and 

17 Customs Enforcement officers. 

18 (E) Exercising prosecutorial discretion 

19 with respect to individuals who came to the 

20 United States as children and with respect to 

21 certain individuals who are the parents of U.S. 

22 citizens or permanent residents. 

23 (F) Expansion of the Provisional Waiver 

24 Program. 

25 (G) Policies supporting U.S. high skilled 

26 businesses and workers. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 31 IH

1 (H) Families of U.S. Armed Forces mem2 bers and enlistees. 

3 (I) Directive to provide consistency regard4 ing advanced parole. 

5 (J) Policies to promote and increase access 

6 to U.S. citizenship. 

7 (2) The memoranda issued by the President on 

8 November 21, 2014, on any of the following sub9 jects: 

10 (A) Creating welcoming communities and 

11 fully integrating immigrants and refugees. 

12 (B) Modernizing and streamlining the U.S. 

13 immigrant visa system for the 21st century. 

14 (3) Any substantially similar memorandum 

15 issued after November 21, 2014. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Bernstein, President and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ BRAD BERNSTEINBrad Bernstein,President and Principal Financial OfficerMay 16, 2011
# Official Journal L 463/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 463 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6428 December 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 463

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6428 December 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2021/2277 of 11 November 2021 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Cook Islands | 1 |
| | * | Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Cook Islands | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2021/2277 of 11 November 2021 on the signing, on behalf of the European Union, and provisional application of the Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Cook Islands

1

*

Protocol on the implementation of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Government of the Cook Islands

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 427A/10 D

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 427A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6310 December 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 427A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6310 December 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority |
| 2020/C 427 A/01 | Vacancy Notice — Chairperson — Ref. 202029TAAD15 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority

2020/C 427 A/01

Vacancy Notice — Chairperson — Ref. 202029TAAD15

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 01-60690

Summary Calendar

 

ARTHUR JOHN MILLER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RONALD JAMES; MICHAEL MORRIS; 

ROBERT SWOPE; KHURSHID YUSUFF,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 5:98-CV-188-BrS

--------------------

March 15, 2002

Before DeMOSS, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Arthur John Miller (“Miller”), federal inmate #88057-020,

appeals the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights suit

filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Miller argues that the

defendants violated his constitutional rights when he was

unjustly placed on Inmate Financial Responsibility Program Refuse

status. Miller alleges that his prison status affected his

prison privileges and eligibility for certain jobs.
No. 01-60690

-2-

The district court did not err in dismissing Miller’s

complaint as frivolous because Miller failed to demonstrate any

constitutional violations. See Bulger v. United States Bureau of

Prisons, 65 F.3d 48, 49-50 (5th Cir. 1995); see also McGhee v.

Clark, 166 F.3d 884, 886 (7th Cir. 1999). 

The decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the hhgregg, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald J.B. Van der Wiel, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By:

/s/ Donald J.B. Van der WielDonald J.B. Van der WielChief Financial Officer


Dated: November 6, 2008
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Iris Biotechnologies Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, SimonChin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)                                 The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934; and

 

(2)                                 The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to beincorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made beforeor after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language insuch filing.

 

 
|   | Date: August 11, 2008 | By:                                                                          |
|--------|----------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                       |
|   |                       |  /s/ Simon Chin                                                         |
|   |                       | Simon, Chin, President, Chief Executive Officer  and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

Mr. JeffVanderlip Technical Director Tiarco Chemical Company 1300 Tiarco Drive. SW. Dalton, GA30721 

### JUL 

# 2Z**101~**

Re: Yourrequest that the EPA revoke Wego Chemical and Mineral Corporation·s conditional exemption !'rom testing under TSCJ\ section 4 for CASRN 127-68-4
DearMr. Vanderlip:
In your letter dated June 25.2014,you requested that the EPA revoke the conditional exemption granted to Wego Chemical andMineral Corporation (Wego) withrespect to testing obligations for benzenesuUOnic acid, 3-nitro-sodium salt (I:1) {CASRN 127-68-4)pursuant to the EPA·s final rule: Testing ofCertain High Production Volume Chemicals; ·n1ird Group ofChemicals (76 FR 65385, Oct. 21. 2011). The EPA granted Wcgo·s exemptionrequest on the basis ofdata submitted by Tiarco Chemical Company. Wego·s exemption request dated .Apri13. 20\4, and the EPA·sresponse dated May 16. 2014. are available in the docket for this action at \V\.Vw.regulations.gov (see: EPA-IIQ-OPPT-2009-0241 and EPA-IIQ-OPPT-2009-0254, respectively).
You requestedthat the Agency revoke Wego·s exemption for lack ofcooperationby Wego in negotiating compensationto Tiarco based on Tiarco's data. However, the EPA lacks authority to revoke Wego·sexemptionfor the reason requested. The EPA regulations at 40 CFR 790.93(a) specify that the EPA can rescind an exemption for the following reasons:
790.93 Termination ofconditional exemption. (a) The EPA shall tenninate a conditional exemption ifiL determines that: (1) Thetest which provided the basis for approval ofthe exemption application has not been started by the deadlines for initiation oftesting adopted in the test rule ormodified in accordance with §790.55; or (2) Data required by the test rule have not been generated in accordance with the test standards or submitted in accordance with the deadlines for submission oftest data that
were adopted in the test rule or modified in accordance with §790.55; or



### .·--·.(3) The testing has not been conducted or the data have not been generated in accordance with the Good Laboratory Practice requirements in part 792 of this chapter. These reasons do nol inclt1de failure lo cooperate in negotiating compensation. Rather, the remedy available to Tiarco under TSCA §4(c)(3) is to initiate a reimbursement hearing under 40 CFR 791.20, which under §791.20(a) is appropriate··[ w]hen persons subject to a test rule are unable to reach an agreement on the amount or method of reimbursement for test dat<\ development.''

If you have <!ny questions about this letter, please contact Mr. John Schaeffer of my staff**(schaefTer.juhn@~pa.gov;** 202-564-8173). Sincerely, Paul Lewis, Ph.D. Chief. Chemica! Information

and Testing Branch (!viC 7405M)
#### LANE v. STATE.

No. 16242.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1933.

See, also, Ex parte Lane (Tex. Cr. App.) 58 S.W.(2d) 80.

Adams *&*McAlister, of Nacogdoches, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

The record is before us without a statement *773of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The verdict of tlie jury assessed tlie punishment at four years’ confinement in the penitentiary. The judgment of the court recites that appellant is condemned to confinement in the x>enitentiary for three years. The sentence is in proper form; it being recited therein that appellant is condemned to confinement for not less than two nor more than four years. The judgment is reformed in order that it may follow the verdict of the jury to show that appellant is condemned to confinement in the penitentiary for four years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
|    |                                                                                                    |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. (the “Registrant”); |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|               |
|---------------|
|               |  |  |
| March 5, 2012 |   | /s/ RUSSELL HAMMER |
|          |   | Russell Hammer  |
|          |   | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer  |
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| Dated:                        August 13, 2007                                                                                                                       |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
|                                                                                                                                                                     |   |   |   |
|                                                                                                                                                                |   |   |   |
| By:                         /s/                        Mordechai Schwartz                                                                                      |   |   |        |
| Name:                       Mordechai                      Schwartz                                                                                            |   |   |        |
| Title:                         Secretary,                        Treasurer, and Director (Principal                          Financial and Accounting Officer) |   |   |        |

----
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2015 11 17324 2015 21 378955 2015 31 267424 2015 32 89342 2015 41 281 2015 42 150 2015 43 1891 2015 51 231 2015 52 13055 2015 53 1875 2015 54 3075 2015 61 2952 2015 62 3937
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

DAVID ROBLES,

 Appellant,

v.

TEXAS 26 LLC,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

 

§

No. 08-22-00102-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law #1 

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2022-CCV00176) 

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be 

dismissed for want of prosecution. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. It 

appearing to this Court that Appellant is indigent for purposes of appeal, this Court makes no other 

order with respect thereto. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2022.

GINA M. PALAFOX, Justice

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Alley, JJ.