alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 99-412 Date: September 29, 1999 

Subject: 1999 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Open Season: Delayed

Shipment of the 2000 Guide to Federal Employees Health Benefit Plans

 

 

We have experienced considerable delays in getting the 2000 Guide to Federal Employees Health

Benefit Plans typeset. This will create delays in printing, shipping and delivery of the Guides to

your agency distribution points.

We expect the printer to ship the following guides by Friday, October 22, 1999.

You may expect delivery shortly thereafter. Please adjust your plans for internal distribution

accordingly.

2000 Guide to FEHB Plans for Federal Civilian Employees (RI 70-1);

2000 Guide to FEHB Plans for TCC and Former Spouses (RI 70-5);

2000 Guide to FEHB Plans for Certain Temporary Employees (RI 70-8);

2000 Guide to FEHB Plans for Federal Civilian Employees in Large Print (RI 70-10)

We expect the printer to deliver the following guides by October 22, 1999:

2000 Guide to FEHB Plans for Individuals Receiving Compensation from OWCP (RI 70-6);

2000 Guide to FEHB Plans for Federal Retirees and their Survivors (RI 70-9)

All the Guides will be available on our web site (www.opm.gov/insure) on November 1, 1999 and

may be viewed or printed to hard copy. 

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System
2

We sincerely regret any problems the delay may cause. We understand that you may wish to

exercise your authority to accept belated open season elections. However, we urge you to be

aware of the importance of getting ID cards to enrollees before the beginning of the new contract

year. 

Thanks for your help and cooperation.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 194 (Monday, October 7, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 81063]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23055]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 7189-015]


Green Lake Water Power Company; Notice of Revised Procedural 
Schedule for Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Project 
Relicense

    On March 31, 2022, Green Lake Water Power Company (Green Lake 
Power) filed an application for a subsequent license to continue to 
operate and maintain the 425-kilowatt Green Lake Hydroelectric Project 
No. 7189 (Green Lake Project). On May 31, 2023, Commission staff issued 
a notice of intent to prepare an environmental assessment (EA) to 
evaluate the effects of relicensing the Green Lake Project. The notice 
included an anticipated schedule for issuing the EA. By notices issued 
April 11, 2024, and June 4, 2024, staff revised the procedural schedule 
for completing the EA.
    On July 15, 2024, Commission staff requested additional information 
related to Green Lake Power's fall reservoir drawdown proposal and 
associated revisions to Exhibits A and E, filed on April 22, 2024. On 
September 16, 2024, Green Lake Power filed the requested additional 
information. In order for staff to fully consider the information filed 
by Green Lake Power, the procedural schedule for completing the EA is 
being revised as follows. Further revisions to the schedule may be made 
as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Issue EA................................................    January 2025
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Amanda Gill 
at (202) 502-6773, or by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#43222e222d27226d242a2f2f03252631206d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a4c5c9c5cac0c58ac3cdc8c8e4c2c1d6c78ac3cbd2">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: September 30, 2024.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-23055 Filed 10-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DJO Finance LLC (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 3, 2010 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on May 12, 2010 (the “Report”), I,Leslie H. Cross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                                    The Reportfully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                 The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:  May 12, 2010                         |   |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                             |   |
| /s/  LESLIE H. CROSS                             |   |
| Leslie  H. Cross                                 |   |
| President,  Chief Executive Officer and Director |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80284]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22708]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 401 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-761, K2024-54.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22708 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
cldb-ex42_7.htm



 

Exhibit 4.2

CORTLAND BANCORP

194 West Main Street

Cortland, OH 44410

November 9, 2017

Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, NE

Washington, D.C. 20549

Re:  Cortland Bancorp Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017

Ladies and Gentlemen:

Cortland Bancorp, an Ohio corporation, is today filing a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 (the "Form 10-Q"), as executed on November 9, 2017. 

Pursuant to the instructions relating to the Exhibits in Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K, Cortland Bancorp hereby agrees to furnish the Commission, upon request, copies of instruments and agreements defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt and of the long-term debt of its consolidated subsidiaries, which are not being filed as exhibits to the Form 10-Q.  No such instrument or agreement represents long-term debt exceeding 10% of the total assets of Cortland Bancorp and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.

Very truly yours,

 


	
/s/ James M. Gasior

	
James M. Gasior

	
President and CEO
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

  WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C8,
  Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
  Series 2012-C8 (the Trust)

  I, Anthony Sfarra, a President of Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage
  Securities, Inc., the depositor into the above-referenced Trust, certify
  that:

  1.I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports Form
    10-D required to be filed in respect of periods included in the year
    covered by this annual report, of the Trust;

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic report, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the pooling and servicing agreement
    in all material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc. as Vendor for Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer, Deutsche Bank National Trust
    Company Americas as Trustee, Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas as
    Trustee for the Northridge Fashion Center Loan and the Town Center of
    Cobb Loan, National Tax Search, LLC as Vendor for Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
     as Master Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC as Trust Advisor,
    Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC as Special Servicer, Torchlight Loan
    Services, LLC as Special Servicer for the Northridge Fashion Center
    Loan and the Town Center of Cobb Loan and TriMont Real Estate Advisors,
    Inc. as Trust Advisor for the Northridge Fashion Center Loan and the
    Town Center of Cobb Loan.

    Dated:   March 31, 2014


    /s/ Anthony Sfarra
    Signature

    President
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN ANTONIO FALCON,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

M. R. PHILLIPS, Correctional Lieutenant at

KVSP,

Defendant

- Appellee. No. 16

- 16177

D.C. No. 1: 10

- cv

- 02262

- EPG

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Erica P. Grosjean, Magistrate Judge, Presiding **

Submitted April 11, 2017 ***

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

California state prisoner Juan Antonio Falcon appeals pro se from the district

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a due process

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** Falcon consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

APR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLER K

U.S. COURT OF APPEAL S2 16

- 16177

claim arising from a disciplinary hearing . We have jurisdiction under 28 U. S.C.

§ 1291. We review de novo. Resnick v. Hayes , 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000)

(dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington , 152 F.3d 1193, 1194

(9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) ). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Falcon’s action because Falcon failed

to allege facts implicating a liberty or property interest protected by the Due

Process Clause

. See Sandin v. Conner , 515 U.S. 472, 4 84 (1995) (protected liberty

or property interest arises under due process clause when a restraint imposes an

“atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary

incidents of prison life”) ; see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)

(plaintiff must allege facts that “allow[ ] the court to draw the reasonable inference

that the defendant is lia ble for the misconduct alleged ”)

.

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

ap peal. See Padgett v. Wright , 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as meritless Falcon’s contention that the district court improperly

restricted his ability to plead his claim.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DERRICK S. CLEMONS,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 219 WAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of October, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
**MAXCO,
      INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**





**EXHIBIT
      23.2 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM—ERNST &
YOUNG LLP**





Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Forms
      S-8
      No. 33-48351 and S-8 No. 333-67539) pertaining to the Maxco, Inc. Incentive
      Stock Option Plan and the Maxco, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, and in the related
      prospectus of our report dated June 11, 2003 with respect to the consolidated
      financial statements of Maxco, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K/A,
      Amendment No. 2) for the year ended March 31, 2005.




/S/
      ERNST
& YOUNG LLP





Detroit,
      Michigan


February
      2, 2006
1

United States Office of Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 23-305 Date: March 2023 

Subject: March 2023 Head Count

This is a reminder for all payroll providers, including cross-service providers 

(e.g., National Finance Center (NFC), Defense Finance and Accounting

Service (DFAS), etc.), to submit the semiannual Headcount for the March 

2023 reporting period no later than March 31, 2023.

The semiannual Headcount reporting (March and September) provides the 

Office of Personnel (OPM) with a snapshot of agency-wide enrollment for 

participants in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS), Federal

Employees Retirement System (FERS), Federal Employees Retirement

System – Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-RAE), Federal Employees

Retirement System – Further Revised Annuity Employees (FERS-FRAE), 

Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program, and/or the Federal 

Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Program.

The March 2023 Headcount reporting period is for payroll paid during the 

first 15 days of March 2023 for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles. For

monthly pay cycles, the reporting period is February 1 through February 28, 

2023.

For questions about the new electronic collection process, please contact the 

Headcount Support Team at HeadcountSupport@opm.gov. 

Headcount reports must be submitted no later than March 31, 2023. If

report submission delays or difficulties are anticipated, please call Ms. Yadira 
Benefits Administration Letter 23-304

2

Vega at 202-606-4842, Olayla Ruffin at 202-606-1498, Eirk Brown 202-606-

1418 or email Fundsmanagement@opm.gov.

Note: The Retirement and Insurance Transfer System (RITS) submission 

should not be delayed due to Headcount reports not being ready.

If you have questions about this letter, please send an email to 

FinancialBALs@opm.gov or call 202-606-0606. We look forward to assisting 

you.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    Date: August 9, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Munawar H. HidayatallahMunawar H. HidayatallahChief Executive Officer Date: August 9, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Victor M. PerezVictor M. PerezChief Financial Officer
#### Leathercraft Corp. et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Albert Perry, Individually and as President of Local 32-J Building Service Employees, International Union, AFL-CIO, et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

August 9, 1957.

*Leon Jaffe*for plaintiffs.

*Aaron Benenson*for defendants.

*392Arthur Gr. Klein-, J.

Motion by the plaintiffs.for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from picketing the premises in which the plaintiffs conduct their business. The defendants are the officers of Local 32-J, Building Service Employees. In the course of its business this local contracts with building owners and cleaning contractors, covering the terms and conditions of employment of its members. This local includes employees engaged in general cleaning and waxing. It does not include window cleaners, who have been organized by another union. Previously, the plaintiff, Morris Kaufman Company, dealt with a cleaning company which had collective bargaining agreements with the defendant union. This contract was apparently cancelled and Kaufman contracted with another company whose general cleaners and waxers are not members of the defendant union. The defendant union has accordingly stationed pickets, apparently not more than three in number, in front of the premises in which the plaintiffs have their place of business. The plaintiffs are seeldng an order of this court restraining such apparently peaceful picketing.

There is no question in the mind of the court that the plaintiffs are engaged in interstate commerce. Consequently, this court has no jurisdiction in this action, which must be adjudicated by the National Labor Relations' Board. This question has been disposed of with finality by the Supreme Court of the United States in March of this year in the cases of *Guss*v. *Utah Labor Relations Bd., Amalgamated Meat Cutters*v. *Fairlawn Meats,*and *Building Trades Council*v. *Garmon*(39 L. R. R. M. 2567, 2571 and 2574, respectively). This rule had previously been laid down in *Matter of New York State Labor Relations Bd.*v. *Wags Transp. System*(284 App. Div. 883).

The picketing herein constitutes a labor dispute *(Goldfinger*v. *Feintuch,*276 N. Y. 281; *People*v. *Muller,*286 N. Y. 281). To prevent unemployment of its members is a legitimate labor objec-. tive of every labor organization. It appears that members of the defendant union were employed by plaintiff Kaufman under the earlier contract. Picketing with truthful signs peacefully conducted is not unlawful *(Silver Dollar Bake Shop*v. *Weissman,*27 N. Y. S. 2d 744).

It may be noted in this case that the signs carried by the pickets state that the defendant union is on strike against Kaufman Co. This obviously is not truthful picketing, but the court is confident that, in view of the colloquy with counsel in open court and since the injunction is denied, the signs will be corrected so that they contain no untruthful statements.

Motion denied. Settle order.
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan



### May 2, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice


### 132334 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan 

### PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices



### v SC: 132334 COA: 260165 Berrien CC: 04-401613-FC WILLIE JOE DEPRIEST, JR., Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 19, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

p0425 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

May 2, 2007

Clerk
post-conviction counsel is discretionary in Nevada, and a prerequisite to

the appointment of counsel is the filing of a petition, and appellant did not file his petition until after the one-year period had passed. 

### See NRS 34.750(1). Third, appellant's ignorance of procedural rules would not provide good cause for the delay. 2 

### See Phelps v. Director, Prisons, 104 Nev. 656, 764 P.2d 1303 (1988). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.



### J. Hardesty 

# p

J. 

## 1

Con.52.4treil e , 

# a Parraguirre Cherry

2 We note that appellant's assertion that he was unaware of or unable to comply with procedural rules defies belief given appellant's lengthy history of litigation in this court, of which we take judicial notice. 

### See e.g., Rowell v. State, Docket Nos. 36601, 36658, 37023 (Order of Affirmance and Dismissing Appeal, April 10, 2001); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket Nos. 36693, 37210, 37242 (Order of Affirmance and Dismissing Appeal and Limited Remand for Correction of Judgment of Conviction, April 10, 2001); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 37283 (Order of Affirmance, July 9, 2001); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 37749 (Order of Affirmance, December 12, 2001); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket Nos. 37836, 37838, 37839 (Order of Affirmance, December 14, 2001); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 42770 (Order of Affirmance, August 30, 2004); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 42909 (Order of Affirmance, September 1, 2004); 

### Rowell v. Warden, Docket No. 43019 (Order of Affirmance, September 22, 2004); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 43059 (Order of Affirmance, August 27, 2004); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 43218 (Order of Affirmance, November 15, 2004); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 43728 (Order of Affirmance, December 13, 2004); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 44595 (Order of Affirmance, April 22, 2005); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 44665 (Order of Affirmance, April 19, 2005); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 44686 (Order of Affirmance, May 3, 2005); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 54708 (Order Affirming in Part, Reversing in Part and Remanding, April 8, 2010); 

### Rowell v. State, Docket No. 59852 (Order of Affirmance, May 9, 2012). J.

SUPREME COURT

OF
NEVADA

(0) 1947A 2

### cc: Hon. James M. Bixler, District Judge Lamarr Rowell Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF

NEVADA

(0) 1947A 

### 3
Increased

my desire

to stay at

my agency

Helped me

reduce

stress

Improved

my health

53%

43%

43%

53%

45%

45%

53%

45%

45%

50%

32%

32%

Do more, be more!

With programs ranging from fitness classes and health

screenings to educational seminars and stress

management programs, there is a health and wellness

program for every employee.

Reach out to your agency health and wellness

coordinator for more information about programs

available at your agency.