alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Ex parte HERRING et al.

No. 15648.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 19, 1932.

Vickers & Campbell, of Lubbock, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court fixing bail of applicants at the sum of $15,000 for each, following their indictment for the offense of robbery with firearms, or being an accomplice to the offense of robbery with firearms.

The facts in the record show that those in charge of a bank at Seagraves, Tex., were held up by one Edwards, who had in his hand a pistol, and by its exhibition compelled the - employees of the bank to deliver to him quite a sum of money. No one was, injured or hurt.. Edwards was the only person who entered the bank and took any active part in the alleged robbery. The theory of the state is that Edwards and these two applicants, with others, had theretofore planned the robbery, and that these applicants are accomplices. Slaughter, one of the applicants herein, made a written confession admitting his guilt as an accomplice, and asserting that of the other applicant, Herring. The state undertakes to corroborate Slaughter by circumstances which might be taken as corroborating his confession. Plainly the confession of' slaughter would not be admissible upon the trial of Herring if a severance should be had and the parties be tried separately.

The testimony shows said parties to have made reasonable effort to make the bail fixed by the trial court herein without success, and that, in the opinion of the witnesses introduced, the parties would not be able to make bail in the amount fixed. There is nothing in the record supporting the conclusion that applicants, if tried and convicted, would be given the death penalty, and in the opinion of, the trial court the eases called for the granting of bail. In our judgment ■the amount of bail fixed was too much.

The judgment fixing bail at $15,000 for each applicant will be reversed, and bail fixed at the sum of $7,500 for each, upon the making of which, with good and sufficient sureties, the applicants will be released.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michael J. Barrist, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls
and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) intentionally omitted;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2008



/s/ Michael J. BarristMichael J. BarristChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.15
  REVOLVING
    PROMISSORY NOTE
    ( this
    Note)
  U.S. $10,000,000.00
    May 18, 2007
    (Date)  Borrower Bank Termination Date Loan Maturity
    Date
    Adjusted LIBOR Rate dividing LIBOR Rate
  Board
  Borrowing Date
  Business Day
  Highest Lawful Rate
  Interest Period




---



##### 



Letter Agreement
  LIBOR Loan
  Loan Documents
  Obligations
  Obligor
  Prime Rate
  Prime Rate Loan
  Statutory Reserves difference
    Effective Prime Rate
  Effective LIBOR Rate




---



##### 



Notice of
    Requested Borrowing
        LIBOR Event




---



##### 








---



##### 



o _
    _ _
    _
    JURY TRIAL WAIVER.
    NO COURSE OF DEALING BETWEEN BORROWER AND BANK, NO COURSE OF
    PERFORMANCE, NO TRADE PRACTICES, AND NO EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE OF
    ANY NATURE MAY BE USED TO CONTRADICT OR MODIFY ANY TERM OF THIS
    NOTE OR ANY OTHER LOAN DOCUMENT.
  THIS NOTE AND THE OTHER WRITTEN LOAN DOCUMENTS REPRESENT
    THE FINAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE
    CONTRADICTED BY EVIDENCE OF PRIOR, CONTEMPORANEOUS, OR
    SUBSEQUENT ORAL AGREEMENTS OF THE PARTIES
  THERE ARE NO UNWRITTEN ORAL AGREEMENTS BETWEEN THE
    PARTIES.




---



##### 



By:
    /s/  Ben
    Harper   Title:
    Senior Vice President  Finance      By:
    /s/  Kevin
    K. Rech
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the annual report of Nacel Energy Corporation (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2008, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brian
      Lavery, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
      certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, another
      document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature
      that
      appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
      statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company and
      will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.




*/s/
                Brian Lavery*Brian
                LaveryChief
                Executive Officer





November
      11 ,
      2008
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between Terminal Auxiliar Maritima, S. A., Petitioner, and Cocotos Steamship Company, Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

October 21, 1957.

*Albert D. Jordon*and *Joel Field*for petitioner.

*Francis J. JIaley*for respondent.

Felix O. Benvenga, J.

This is a motion to confirm an award and to direct the entry of judgment thereon. Respondent opposes the application on jurisdictional grounds. The agreement provides for arbitration in New York. Such an agreement is valid and binding, and is in itself a consent to the jurisdiction of the courts of this State to enforce the agreement even to' the extent of entering judgment upon the arbitrators’ award, and even though the parties thereto are foreign corporations not authorized io do business in this State *(Matter of Galban Lobo Co.,*271 App. Div. 310, 312; *Matter of Bradford*
      *698
      *Woolen Corp.,*189 Misc. 242, 244-245; *Matter of Republique Francaise [Cellosilk Mfg. Co.],*124 N. Y. S. 2d 93, 99-100, revd. 284 App. Div. 699, revd. 309 N. Y. 269; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1450, as amd. by L. 1944, ch. 423).

True, a foreign corporation (other than a moneyed corporation) cannot maintain *11*any action ’ ’ in this State upon any contract made by it in this State, unless before the making of such a contract it shall have obtained a certificate of authority from the Secretary of State (General Corporation Law, §§ 210, 218). But these sections should be read in connection with section 1450 of the Civil Practice Act. When so read, it is clear that while a corporation cannot maintain an “action” based on the contract, it may institute a ‘1 special proceeding ’ ’ (see Civ. Prac. Act, § 1459) to enforce the arbitration. Here, the petitioner has instituted such a proceeding, and not an action. The *Matter of Vanguard Films*case (188 Misc. 796), upon which respondent relies, is therefore, inapplicable.

The motion is in all respects granted. Settle order.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the hhgregg, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jerry W. Throgmartin, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Jerry W. ThrogmartinJerry W. ThrogmartinChairman and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 14, 2007
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 12-308 Date: August 2012

Subject: September 2012 Headcount 

This is a reminder for payroll providers to submit the semiannual Headcount for the September 2012 

reporting period no later than September 19, 2012. 

The September 2012 Headcount for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles will be for the payroll paid during 

the FIRST 15 DAYS of September. For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period will be August 1 

through August 31, 2012. All Headcount reports must be submitted no later than September 19, 2012. 

We ask that you notify us if you anticipate a delay or any difficulties in submitting the report by that date. 

Under no circumstances, however, should you delay transmitting your normal Retirement and Insurance 

Transfer System (RITS) report because your Headcount is not ready to be submitted. 

Please FAX (using CLEAR, legible originals) your OPM Forms 1523 and SF 2812-A to us at 

202-606-0701. If you prefer, you may email your forms toYadira.Vega@opm.gov or 

Kenneth.Harris@opm.gov. In addition, please mail the original forms to: U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management, Funds Management, P. O. Box 7125, Washington DC 20415. If you have any questions 

concerning the preparation of your Headcount report, please call Ms. Vega at 202-606-4842. 

 

 

Emily Dean 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
#### SCARBOROUGH v. KERR et al.

No. 2573.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont

April 12, 1934.

Curtis W. Fenley, R. W. Fairchild, and Jack U. Scarborough, all of Lufkin, for appellant.

Guinn & Guinn, of Rusk, for appellees.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

In this case on a bill of review, the trial court set aside a judgment by default in favor of appellant, W. M. . Scarborough, against B. B. Kerr as principal, and L. D. Guinn and L. H. Jones as sureties, on a re-plevin bond in a garnishment case; and by the final judgment released the principal and sureties from all liability on the bond. The issue made by the bill of review against the judgment by default and found by the court in support of the judgment appealed from was that the fund replevined was not subject to garnishment. The appeal is prosecuted only against the sureties. On this statement the judgment in favor of the principal has become final. The result necessarily follows that appellant has no cause of action against the sureties on the appeal bond. The principle of law controlling this conclusion was thus stated by the court in Garrett v. Dodson (Tex. Civ. App.) 199 S. W. 675, 677: “ 3⁄8 * * We think any plea by the principal of the bond, if established, which would release him, will also release the sureties and will inure to their benefit, whether urged by them or not in a separate plea. Under articles 1842 and 1897, judgment cannot be rendered against parties secondarily liable where no judgment is rendered against the primary obligor. If the primary obligor is not liable, the surety would be released upon establishing that fact. It occurs to us that, when the principal and sureties are sued in the same action upon the same contract, if the principal pleads facts showing nonliability which would defeat a judgment against him, whether pleaded by the sureties or not, they could urge, both in the court below and upon appeal, such nonliability under the plea made .by the principal. Wills v. Tyer [Tex. Civ. App.] 186 S. W. 862, and authorities cited ; Wandelohr v. Grayson County Nat. Bank, 102 Tex. 20, 108 S. W. 1154, 112 S. W. 1046.”

*608Appellant’s motion to amend bis appeal bond by making the principal a party thereto comes too late and is therefore overruled. It -follows, therefore, that the judgment appealed from must be in all things affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Affirmed.
United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 99-219 Date: October 26, 1999 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Termination of United

HealthCare of Puerto Rico, Enrollment Code 7U.

We have just been informed that United HealthCare of Puerto Rico, code 7U, will cease

operations in Puerto Rico effective December 31, 1999. This plan will no longer participate in the

FEHB Program. 

Since the 2000 FEHB Guides had already gone to print when the plan made its decision to

withdraw, the plan’s name will appear in the Guides. Please do not allow employees to newly

enroll in this plan. 

The plan will send notices of its withdrawal to its enrollees. All enrollees in this plan must make

an open enrollment change to another plan during open season. Enrollees who fail to choose

another plan during open season will have no benefits for 2000. Consequently, if you have

employees in the area served by the plan, we ask that you notify them directly of the plan’s

withdrawal. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division

 __________________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT
Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
  1.
    
    The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: November 9, 2007
 /s/ Michael J. MayellMichael J. MayellPresident 43
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December
31, 2008 of Affinity Gold Corp. (formerly Syncfeed Inc.), a Nevada corporation
(the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the “Report”), I, Antonio Rotundo, President, CEO, CFO and a
director of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Dated:
      February 12, 2009
            /s/ Antonio RotundoAntonio
      Rotundo, President, CEO, CFO and a Director(Principal
      Financial Officer)
# C_2023250EN.01000201.xml

| 14.7.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 250/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.7.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 250/2

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107895

(2023/C 250/02)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 20.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107895 |
| Member State | Cyprus |
| Region | Cyprus |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Καθεστώς κρατικών ενισχύσεων στον τομέα των αιγοπροβάτων |
| Legal basis | Ministerial Council Decision with number 94.491 and Date of 22nd of February 2023 (ANNEX_B) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy, Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 7 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Raising of sheep and goats |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Department of Agriculture |
| 1412 Nicosia |

Date of adoption of the decision

20.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107895

Member State

Cyprus

Region

Cyprus

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Καθεστώς κρατικών ενισχύσεων στον τομέα των αιγοπροβάτων

Legal basis

Ministerial Council Decision with number 94.491 and Date of 22nd of February 2023 (ANNEX_B)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy, Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 7 000 000 EUR

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Raising of sheep and goats

Name and address of the granting authority

Department of Agriculture

1412 Nicosia

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---