alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 35.1

 

ANNUAL SERVICER’S COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE

 

This Compliance Certificateis furnished pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”), dated as of July 19, 2012,by and among Hyundai Auto Receivables Trust 2012-B, Hyundai Capital America, as seller and servicer (the “Servicer”),Hyundai ABS Funding Corporation, as depositor, and Citibank, N.A., as indenture trustee and Item 1123 of Regulation AB. The undersignedhereby certifies that:

 

1)         I am a duly authorized officer of theServicer.

 

2)         A review of the activities of the Servicerfrom January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Relevant Period”) and of the Servicer’s performance underthe Agreement during the Relevant Period has been made under my supervision.

 

3)         Based on such review, the Servicer has,to the best of my knowledge, fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the RelevantPeriod.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have duly executed thisCompliance Certificate this 17th day of March, 2015.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-7294

MICHAEL WOODSON, a/k/a George T. Baskerville,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

VIRGINIA PAROLE BOARD; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF

CORRECTIONS; VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE AND

PROBATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-95-505-2)

Submitted: January 18, 1996 Decided: February 1, 1996

Before HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Woodson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the dismissal without prejudice of his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 complaint for failure to respond to a court order. We

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is

not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over

final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory

and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988); Fed. R. Civ. P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541

(1949). Because Appellant may be able to save this action by filing

an amended complaint in compliance with the district court's order,

the dismissal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local

392, 10 F.3d 1064 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report (Amendment No. 1) of Mainland Resources, Inc. (the "Company")on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending November 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Nicholas W. Atencio, Chief Executive Officer, and William D. Thomas, Chief Financial Officer, of the Company, certify to the best of our knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date: November 8, 2010



"Nicholas W. Atencio"Nicholas W. Atencio
Chief Executive Officer



Date: November 8, 2010



"William D. Thomas"William D. Thomas
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Morry
Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ MORRY F.
      RUBINMorry
      F. RubinChief
      Executive OfficerMay
      14, 2009
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction)
    
    0-20310
(Commission File Number)
    
    75-2379388
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 1105 Peters Road, Harvey, Louisiana
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    70058
(Zip Code)
 
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement




---



##### 



Item 2.03
    
    Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation under an Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangement of a Registrant.
  Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
  10.1
    
    First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 1, 2007 among Superior Energy
Services, Inc., SESI, L.L.C., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the lenders party thereto.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  SUPERIOR ENERGY SERVICES, INC.By:
    /s/ Robert S. TaylorRobert S. TaylorChief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 10.1
    
    First Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated July 1, 2007 among Superior Energy
Services, Inc., SESI, L.L.C., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the lenders party thereto.
#### KILPATRICK v. STATE.

No. 18429.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 3, 1936.

J. P. Word, of Meridian, and Geo. W. Mills, of Waco, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for fifty years.

It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed Roy Yocham by striking him with an axe and by cutting him with a knife.

Several witnesses for the state testified to the effect that on the 6th of September, 1935, appellant and A. C. Smith killed deceased by cutting him with a knife and striking him with an axe. Testifying in his own behalf, appellant declared that he was not present when deceased was killed. Appellant’s wife testified that appellant was at home with her on the occasion of the homicide.

No bills of exception are brought forward and no exceptions to the charge of the court are found in the record.

The evidence is sufficient to support the judgment.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant insists that the witness Everett, testifying for the state, gave evidence at variance ¡with the testimony of the other eyewitnesses, and that it brings the testimony in such condition of conflict as that the conviction should not be allowed to stand. We have reviewed the testimony of the other witnesses, and also that of Everett, and have concluded that while he does mention some things that the others do not speak of, there is nothing in the matters mentioned by him which negatives the guilt of the accused, or should operate to cause reversal of the case.

We are unable to follow appellant’s argument against the charge of the court on the question of alibi. This court has often approved the charge given, which was, in substance, that if the evidence raised a reasonable doubt in the minds of the jury as to appellant’s presence at the time and place of the homicide, he should be acquitted.

Not being able to agree with any of appellant’s contentions, the motion for rehearing will be overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GT Solar International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 27, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard E. Johnson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date: August 5, 2009/s/ RICHARD E. JOHNSON Richard E. Johnson
Vice President of Finance and
Corporate Controller (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
United States

Office of Personnel Management

Retirement Operations Center

Boyers, Pennsylvania 16017

U. S. Office of Personnel Management 

Public Law 117-2 

For Local Reproduction Only

OF 5057

April 2021

Emergency Paid Leave Tracking

This form can be used to track Emergency Paid Leave (EPL) taken by an employee under Public Law 117-2. The number of 

EPL hours used by an employee should be reported to OPM on the final separation Individual Retirement Record (IRR) - SF 

2806 or SF 3103 - when the employee retires. Please see Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) 21-102 for more information.

Employee name (last, first, middle) Date of birth (mm/dd/yyyy)

Dates of Emergency Paid Leave Emergency Paid Leave

Hours Used From (mm/dd/yyyy) To (mm/dd/yyyy)

Total Emergency Paid Leave Hours 

For Agency Use
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 95-711 Date: November 22, 1995 

SUBJECT: Upcoming Satellite Broadcast

The purpose of this letter is to inform you that the next HRM: Information Highway

Governmentwide Satellite Broadcast on December 6, 1995, will contain a segment on

retirement issues.

The 90-minute satellite broadcast is part of a series sponsored by the Interagency Advisory

Group Directors of Personnel. The topic for the December show is "Where are we now? An

update of Federal human resources management issues." Topics will include: a legislative

update, the new OPM, and an update on career transition. The segment on retirement issues

will provide information on why timely, complete retirement packages are important. We

also will identify resources and tools that can help you do your job better and highlight some

of the customer service improvements that we have undertaken at OPM. 

The broadcast will be from 1:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. EST on Wednesday, December 6, 1995. 

Updated satellite information is listed below. Additional information about this, and other

broadcasts in the series, can be found in the Communication/Satellite Info Forum on OPM

Mainstreet. Mainstreet can be reached at 202-606-4800 

C-BAND: Satellite: Telstar 402R; Downlink Freq: 4100; Transponder: 20;

Channel: 20; Polarity: Horizontal; Position: 89 Degrees; West Audio:

6.2/6.8

KU-BAND: Satellite: Galaxy 7; Downlink Freq: 11930; Transponder: 12;

Channel: 12; Polarity: Vertical; Position: 91 Degrees West; Audio:

6.2/6.8

Mary M. Sugar, Chief

Agency Service Division
|   | 1.     | The      Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30,      2009 (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | 2.     | Information      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of the    Company.                                                                          |

|                                          | /s/      Xiaoqun Ye                |
|-----------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
|  Date:      November 13, 2009       | Xiaoqun      Ye                    |
|                                          | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                                          | (Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                                          |                               |
|                                          | /s/      Yan Lin                   |
|  Date:       November 13, 2009 | Yan      Lin                       |
|                                          | Chief      Accounting Officer      |
|                                          | (Principal      FinancialOfficer)  |

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3464 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3464

   To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility 
 located in a ZIP code with a high rate of population growth, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 9, 2015

  Mr. Grijalva (for himself and Mr. Gallego) introduced the following 
 bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government 
                                 Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the United 
States Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility 
 located in a ZIP code with a high rate of population growth, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending Quality Postal Delivery 
for the Future Act''.

SEC. 2. CLOSURE OR CONSOLIDATION OF POSTAL FACILITIES IN ZIP CODES WITH 
              HIGH POPULATION GROWTH.

    Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(f)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the 
Postal Service may not close or consolidate any post office or other 
postal facility that is located in a ZIP code that has a high rate of 
population growth.
    ``(2)(A) Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment of this 
subsection, and not later than 60 days after the end of each year 
thereafter, the Postmaster General shall determine, in consultation 
with the Secretary of Commerce, whether a ZIP code has a high rate of 
population growth for purposes of paragraph (1).
    ``(B) In making the annual determination required under 
subparagraph (A), the Postmaster General shall, using population data 
available from the Bureau of the Census, compare the population of a 
ZIP code at the end of such year with the population of such ZIP code 
at the beginning of such year.''.
                                 <all>
```
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 1986 

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 96-405 Date: October 7, 1996 

SUBJECT: FEHB Open Season: FEHB Guide Shipment Delay

_____________________________________________________________________

This is to advise you that, due to production delays, shipment of the 1997 FEHB 

Guide for Federal civilian employees (RI 70-1), may be delayed for up to five 

days.

The Guides for individuals covered under TCC (RI 70-5), for temporary employees 

(RI 70-8), and for visually impaired employees (RI 70-10) will be similarly delayed.

These delays will not require an extension of Open Season. However, if 

circumstances arise that prevent individuals from making timely Open Season 

changes, you are reminded that agencies have the authority to permit belated Open 

Season changes in individual cases. 

 Abby L. Block, Chief

 Insurance Policy 

 and Information Division
#### RADOFF BROS., Inc., Appellant, v. GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, Independent Executor, et al., Appellees. RUMMAGE COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, Independent Executor, et al., Appellees. H. BERGMAN,. Appellant, v. GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, Independent Executor, et al., Appellees. MYSTIC WASHER COMPANY, Inc., Appellant, v. GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, Independent Executor, et al., Appellees.

Nos. 9802-9805.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Galveston.

Jan. 31, 1933.

Rehearing Denied March 9, 1933.

A. M. Waugh and C. L. Bass, both of Houston, for appellant.

*610Lewis & Burr, of Houston, for appellee R. L. Autrey.

Sam Neathery and W.' D. Orem, both of Houston, for appellee city of Houston.

Baker, Botts, Andrews *&*Wharton, E. G. Coates, and John T. McCullough, all of Houston, for appellee Guardian Trust Co.

PLEASANTS, Chief Justice.

These are companion cases to that of Radoff v. Guardian Trust Company (Tex. Civ. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 607, and by agreement of the parties were submitted with the Radoff Case.

The controlling question in each of the cases is the same, and the pertinent allegations of the petition to which appellees’ pleas of misjoinder were sustained are identical in each case.

We need only refer to our opinion in the Radoff Case for our reasons for affirming the judgment in each of these cases.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

February 18, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-10677

Conference Calendar

 

JEFFERY MCDANIEL,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

K. J. WENDT; KATHLEEN HAWK SAWYER,

Respondents-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 3:03-CV-00454-H 

--------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, EMILIO M. GARZA, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Jeffery McDaniel, federal prisoner # 08769-078, appeals the

district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition alleging

that his constitutional rights were violated when the Bureau

of Prisons (“BOP”) denied him a one-year sentence reduction,

pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e), after initially informing him

that he was eligible for such a reduction. 

McDaniel renews his argument that the denial of the one-year

credit violated his due process rights and that promissory
No. 03-10677

-2-

estoppel should prevent the BOP from reneging on its statement

of eligibility. His claims fail because there is no protected

liberty interest in early release under 18 U.S.C. § 3621(e). 

See Rublee v. Fleming, 160 F.3d 213, 216 (5th Cir. 1998); Venegas

v. Henman, 126 F.3d 760, 765 (5th Cir. 1997) (“[t]he loss of

the mere opportunity to be considered for discretionary early

release is too speculative to constitute a deprivation of a

constitutionally protected liberty interest”). Accordingly, the

district court did not err in denying McDaniel’s petition, and

its judgment is AFFIRMED.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 **

**OF      THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                for the periods presented therein. |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:                May 9, 2008 | /s/                Jacob Silverman     |
|----------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                             |                              |
|                             | JACOB                SILVERMAN         |
|                             | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
OPM.gov / 

Skip to main content

### In this section

### Resources For

          - New / Prospective Employees
          - Federal Employees
          - Retirees or Family Members
          - Benefits Officers

## You have reached a collection of archived material.

The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.

# Standard Form 2811 is no longer available

***United StatesOffice ofPersonnel Management The Federal Government's Human Resources Agency***

----

Several years ago, we made the use of Standard Form 2811, Transmittal and Summary Report to Carrier, optional. Since then, most of you have stopped using this form. We have decided to discontinue the availability of the form because of its low usage. We are revising the FEHB Handbook to remove any references to the SF 2811.

Abby L. Block, Chief Insurance Policy and Information Division