alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to                               ( print page 80278)                            the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 360 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-727, K2024-20.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22685 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 95-703 Date: March 17, 1995 

SUBJECT: Request for Assistance with FEHBP Telephone Survey

_________________________________________________________________

The Office of Personnel Management is planning a telephone survey

of our customers, Federal employees, to get their views on our

customer service standards and on some of the material we publish

for the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. We need your

help in accomplishing this goal.

Our plan is to survey a random sample of about 400 employees from

as many Federal agencies as possible throughout the nation. You

can help by photocopying a few pages of your internal employee

phone directory (about 50 employees and their work phone numbers

will do) and faxing them to us. To ensure that the sample is

representative we need this information from both headquarters

offices and field installations.

Please fax the information as soon as possible to:

Ralph Pierce

Survey Project Leader

Fax number: 202-606-0767 or 202-606-0741

If you have questions, Ralph's telephone number is 202-606-0745.

We expect to begin the interviews Wednesday, March 22. We hope

to conclude all interviews by Monday, March 27, 1995. We

estimate the average interview will take 10-12 minutes to

complete.

We appreciate your support.
[No. 18696-2-III.

Division Three.

November 16, 2000.]

#### Thomas A. Bove, et al., *Appellants,*v. Leroy F. Schlosstein, et al., *Defendants,*Paul J. Allison, et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 98-2-01786-9, Linda G. Tompkins, J., entered August 26, 1999. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Kato, JJ.
Exhibit 10.6
 Buffalo Wild Wings®
  RECITALS
 Buffalo Wild Wings
 Buffalo Wild
Wings
    Buffalo Wild Wings
  Buffalo Wild Wings




---



##### 



North Boundary East
Boundary South Boundary West Boundary
 North Boundary East
Boundary South Boundary West Boundary
    Appendix B
 Cumulative number ofDate by Which
    
    Date by Which the
    
    Restaurants Required toFranchise
    
    Restaurant Must be
    
    be Open andAgreement Must
    
    Opened and
    
    Continuously Operatingbe Signed and Site
    
    Continuously
    
    for Business in theApproval Request
    
    Operating for
    
    Development TerritoryRestaurant
    
    Restaurant
    
    Must be Submitted
    
    Business in the
    
    as of the Date inNumber
    
    Type
    
    to us
    
    Territory
    
    Preceding Column1
    
    Free Standing
    
    Date of this Agreement
    
    July 1, 2004
    
    12
    
    End Cap
    
    August 1, 2004
    
    July 1, 2005
    
    23
    
    End Cap
    
    August 1, 2005
    
    May 1, 2006
    
    34
    
    End Cap
    
    March 1, 2006
    
    May 1, 2007
    
    45
    
    End Cap
    
    August 1, 2006
    
    September 1, 2007
    
    56
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2007
    
    November 1, 2007
    
    67
    
    TBD
    
    August 1, 2007
    
    March 1, 2008
    
    78
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2008
    
    November 1, 2008
    
    89
    
    TBD
    
    August 1, 2008
    
    March 1, 2009
    
    910
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2009
    
    November 1, 2009
    
    1011
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2010
    
    November 1, 2010
    
    1112
    
    TBD
    
    October 1, 2010
    
    May 1, 2011
    
    1213
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2011
    
    November 1, 2011
    
    1314
    
    TBD
    
    October 1, 2011
    
    May 1, 2012
    
    1415
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2012
    
    November 1, 2012
    
    1516
    
    TBD
    
    October 1, 2012
    
    May 1, 2013
    
    1617
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2013
    
    November 1, 2013
    
    1718
    
    TBD
    
    October 1, 2013
    
    May 1, 2014
    
    1819
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2014
    
    November 1, 2014
    
    1920
    
    TBD
    
    October 1, 2014
    
    May 1, 2015
    
    2021
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2015
    
    October 1, 2015
    
    2122
    
    TBD
    
    October 1, 2015
    
    May 1, 2016
    
    2223
    
    TBD
    
    March 1, 2016
    
    October 1, 2016
    
    23
  2




---



##### 



Effect
 Counterparts
 DEVELOPER:
    
    
    
    US:AMC WINGS, INC.
    
    
    
    BUFFALO WILD WINGS INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date: 11/01/2007
    
    
    
    Date: 11/05/2007/s/ T. Michael Ansley

    
    
    

    /s/ Sally J. SmithBy:
    

Diversified Restaurant Holdings, Inc.
    
    
    
    By:
    

Sally J. SmithAs Sole Shareholder of AMC Wings, Inc.
    
    
    
    
    

Its: President & CEOIts: President & CEO, T. Michael Ansley
  3
# FILED
January 14, 1998 Cecil W. Crowson Appellate Cou rt Clerk IN THE COURT OF CR IMINAL A PPEALS OF TENN ESSEE AT NASHVILLE DONNIE EUGENE BENSON, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 01C

01-9708-CR-00324 Appellant, ) (No. 86-F -148 5 Bel ow) ) DAVIDSON COUNTY VS. ) ) The Hon. J. Randall Wy att, Jr. STATE OF TENN ESSEE, ) ) (Di smissal ofPost-Conviction Petition) Appellee. ) ) AFFIRMED PU RSUANT TO R ULE 20

O R D E R

This matter is before t he Court upon the appellant’s pr o se Request to Proceed on the Record Without the Filing of Briefs. The state opposes the motion. The appellantis appealing from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction rel ief without a hearing. In finding that the appellant’s petition w

as barred by the statute of limitation, the trial court noted that the appellant pl ed guilty to one count of aggravated rape on April 13, 1987. No appeal was taken. The trial court held that the petitioner’s claims, which did not fall within any of the st atutorily recogniz ed exceptions, were bar red by the statute of limitation.

The Court finds tha t the app ellant’s request is well taken . Accordin gly, we have reviewed the record in the above-styled cause without the benefit of arg ument, and
we fi nd that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed pursuant to Rule 20, Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals Rules.

On May 13, 1996, the Post-Conviction Procedure Act was amended to reflect that no court shall have jur isdiction to consider a petition filed after the one-year statute of limitation unless one of

three enumerated exceptions ap plied. See T.C.A. § 40-30-202(b). In the present case, the trial court correctly determined that the appellant’s petition forpostconviction was time -barred . Moreover, the tri al court could not have c onsidered the request for relief as a petitionfor habeas corpus. The petition in this case was filed in Davidson County, Tennessee, the county in which the appellant w as originally con

victed. His petition shows that he i s present ly incarcerated in Morgan County, Tennessee. A-2-

petition for habeas corpus must be filed in the county which is the

most convenient in point of distance t o the applicant unless a sufficient reason be given in the petition for no t applying to such court. T.C.A. § 29-21-105 (1980).

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the appellant’s motion to consider the above-styledappeal on the record is g ranted, and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuantto Rule 20, Te nnessee Cour t of Crimi nal App eals Rules. The appellant bein g indigent, costs are tax

ed to the state.
ENTER, this the ____ day of Januar y, 1998.

_____________________________ JERRY L. SMITH, JUD GE CONCUR:

_____________________________ JOHN H. PEAY, JUDG E

_____________________________ DAVID H. WELLES, JUDGE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0099

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

MATTHEW MORGAN MAYS,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 19, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 13 2023

06/13/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0099
EXHIBIT 10.7 




SCHEDULE OF UNIT OPTION AGREEMENTS 

dated October 28, 2004 



The following have executed Unit
Option Agreements substantially in the form of the agreement attached as Exhibit 10.6
(the “Exhibit”) to the Valero L.P. Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,
2004. 




Curtis V. Anastasio

Steven A. Blank

James R. Bluntzer

Rodney L. Reese

Jerry D. McVicker 



The following information sets forth
the material details in which the Unit Option Agreements described in this Schedule differ
from the Exhibit. 


	Named Executive Officer	Number of Options
	Curtis V. Anastasio	 	 	9,625	 	 
	Steven A. Blank	 	 	6,875	 	 
	James R. Bluntzer	 	 	2,475	 	 
	Rodney L. Reese	 	 	2,400	 	 
	Jerry D. McVicker	 	 	2,400
#### HOLLOWAY v. STATE.

No. 17157.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1935.

W. H. Adkins and Sam McCollum, both of Brady, for appellant.

Uoyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for theft of turkeys; punishment, a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for ten days.

We find in the record only one bill of exceptions, which brings forward complaint of the fact that a witness testified to the careful examination of the alleged stolen turkeys in question by Mr. Ogle, the owner, at the time said turkeys were found in Mason county, where the state claimed they had been taken and sold by appellant. If we understand the complaint made by appellant in said bill, it is in the nature of an assertion that the examination made by Mr. Ogle was.res inter alios acta, that he, appellant, was not present, and that the care exhibited by Mr. Ogle and the length of time taken by him in the examination of said turkeys was some hurtful matter which should not have been introduced. We find nothing in the complaint. If there be any serious question in this ease, it is that of the identification of the alleged stolen turkeys, and the testimony as to the careful examination of said turkeys and the manner in which the examination was made by the owner wcmld be competent and material.

We think the evidence sufficiently supports the jury’s conclusion of guilt. Mr. Ogle lost six turkeys about the 15th of November, 1933. They were taken from a pen near Mr. Ogle’s house some time during the night. Appellant was seen in the immediate vicinity that night with a coop in his car. Shortly thereafter he sold in á neighboring county turkeys answering'in every.way the description of the turkeys of Mr. Ogle. The turkeys were marked by having the rear toe cut off the right foot of each. The feather markings of the stolen turkeys, as well as the toe marks, of those sold by appellant were identical. Mr. Ogle testified to the fact that two turkeys were taken on said night, which had the same markings, but which he did not recover, also had sore heads and were a little light in weight. The purchaser from appellant said he declined to take two of the turkeys brought to his place by appellant, which corresponded in markings to the alleged stolen turkeys, because they were soreheaded and light in weight. The sufficiency of the identification was a question for the jury. We believe there was evidence enough before them to justify them in their belief that the turkeys sold by appellant in Mason county were the turkeys lost by Mr. Ogle in McCulloch county. The case was submitted to the jury on the law of circumstantial evidence.

Binding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
#### HAMPTON v. STATE.

No. 18530.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*420MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of cattle is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented.' The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. Nothing has been presented justifying reversal or requiring discussion.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1
 Certification
of Principal Executive Officer
 Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2010 (the “Report”) of United States Gasoline Fund, LP (the “Registrant”),
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I,
Nicholas D. Gerber, the President and Chief Executive Officer of United States
Commodity Funds LLC, General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the
best of my knowledge, that:
  (1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
  (2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Registrant.
  
 Date:
      May 10, 2010
              By:
              /s/
      Nicholas D. GerberName:
                Title:
              Nicholas
      D. Gerber
                President
      and Chief Executive Officer
                United
      States Commodity Funds LLC,
                General
      Partner of United States Gasoline Fund,
LP
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed May 15 , 2014

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 14

- 00290

- CR

DEANTE KEIVON CLAY , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 339th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1403118

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant entered a guilty plea to aggravated robbery with a deadly weapon

. In accordance with the terms of a plea bargain agreement with the State, the tri al court sentenced appellant to confinement for fifteen years in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice. Appellant filed a pro se notice of appeal. We dismiss the appeal.2

The trial court entered a certificatio n of the defendant’s right to appeal in which the court certified that this is a plea bargain case, and the defendant has no right of appeal. See T ex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2). The trial court’s certification is included in the record on appeal. See T ex. R. A pp. P. 25.2(d). The record supports
the trial court’s certification. See Dears v. State , 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Jamison, and McCally

. Do Not Publish

— Tex. R. App

. P. 47.2(b)
SERVED: APRIL 8, 2011 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATl^l^'^pH t^^^lON „-, 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS •''- ' OrthrtlllJ: o 

WASHINGTON, DC 

) • n J A IQ: 22 

IN THE MATTER OF 

POLAR AIR CARGO, INC. 

FAA DOCKET NO. CP07EA0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2007-27914 

ORDER OF CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE 

In view of the impending prospective lapse in FY2011 appropriations funding 

government operations as of April 8, 2011, the Department has directed that all employees in the 

Office of Hearings will be fiirloughed in the event of such a lapse. Accordingly, in the event of 

such a lapse, the Office of Hearings will close on Friday, April 8, 2011, for the duration of the 

shutdown. 

Any deadline, whether set by regulation or previous order, is suspended and extended for 

the duration of the shutdown. 

SO ORDERED. 

Ronnie A. Yoder 

Chief Administrative Law Jiid 

Attachment - Service List 
FAA Docket No. CP07EA0006 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1OOO' 

ONE COPY 

Paul A. Lange, Respondent's Counsel 

Law Offices of Paul A. Lange, LLC 

80 Ferry Boulevard 

Stratford, CT 06615-6079 

TEL: 203-375-7724 

FAX: 203-375-9397 

Christian L. Lewerenz, Complainant's Counsel 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Eastern Region 

1 Aviation Plaza 

Jamaica, NY 11434 

TEL: 718-553-3273 

FAX: 718-995-5699 

The Honorable Ronnie A. Yoder, 

Chief Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20, Room E12-320 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2142 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

' Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building—Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

- 2 -
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of TRIPLE A MEDICAL, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  November 11, 2009




/s/ P. Morgan McCune




Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Executive Officer








Dated:  November 11, 2009




/s/ P. Morgan McCune




Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3464 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that the United States 

Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility located 

in a ZIP code with a high rate of population growth, and for other 

purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 9, 2015 

Mr. GRIJALVA (for himself and Mr. GALLEGO) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 39, United States Code, to provide that 

the United States Postal Service may not close or consolidate any postal facility located in a ZIP code with 

a high rate of population growth, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Defending Quality 

5 Postal Delivery for the Future Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3464 IH

1 SEC. 2. CLOSURE OR CONSOLIDATION OF POSTAL FACILI2 TIES IN ZIP CODES WITH HIGH POPULATION 

3 GROWTH. 

4 Section 404 of title 39, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(f)(1) Notwithstanding any other provision of this 

7 title, the Postal Service may not close or consolidate any 

8 post office or other postal facility that is located in a ZIP 

9 code that has a high rate of population growth. 

10 ‘‘(2)(A) Not later than 30 days after the date of en11 actment of this subsection, and not later than 60 days 

12 after the end of each year thereafter, the Postmaster Gen13 eral shall determine, in consultation with the Secretary of 

14 Commerce, whether a ZIP code has a high rate of popu15 lation growth for purposes of paragraph (1). 

16 ‘‘(B) In making the annual determination required 

17 under subparagraph (A), the Postmaster General shall, 

18 using population data available from the Bureau of the 

19 Census, compare the population of a ZIP code at the end 

20 of such year with the population of such ZIP code at the 

21 beginning of such year.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3233 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to protect unpaid 

interns in the legislative branch from workplace harassment and discrimination, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. CUMMINGS (for himself, Mr. SCOTT of Virginia, and Ms. MENG) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on House 

Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to 

protect unpaid interns in the legislative branch from 

workplace harassment and discrimination, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Congressional Intern 

5 Protection Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3233 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO UNPAID INTERNS OF RIGHTS AND 

2 PROTECTIONS AGAINST EMPLOYMENT DIS3 CRIMINATION UNDER CONGRESSIONAL AC4 COUNTABILITY ACT OF 1995. 

5 Section 201 of the Congressional Accountability Act 

6 of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1311) is amended— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as sub8 section (e); and 

9 (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the fol10 lowing new subsection: 

11 ‘‘(d) APPLICATION TO UNPAID INTERNS.— 

12 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Subsections (a) and (b) 

13 shall apply with respect to an intern, including an 

14 applicant for an internship and a former intern, in 

15 the same manner and to the same extent as such 

16 subsections apply with respect to an employee. 

17 ‘‘(2) INTERN DEFINED.—The term ‘intern’ 

18 means an individual who performs uncompensated 

19 voluntary service for an employing office to earn 

20 credit awarded by an educational institution or to 

21 learn a trade or occupation.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS