alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04

- 19

- 00052

- CV

IN RE Phillip DANDY

Original Mandamus Proceeding 1

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Irene Rios, Justice

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Delivered and Filed: May 1, 2019

PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DENIED

On January 29, 2019, r elator filed a petition for writ of mandamus. After considering the

petition, this court concludes relator is not entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition

for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2017

- CI

- 11412, styled Daniel Uro v. Lyft, Inc. v. Phillip N. Dandy , pending

in the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Norma Gonzales presiding.
9th Conference on Air Qual

Modeling – A&WMA AB3 

Comments on Use of Gridd

Meteorological Data 

Joseph Scire

TRC Environmental Corporation
Comment Areas

• Use of existing tools• Two step evaluation process• Evaluation variables• Sensitivity to prognostic model options• Metric for evaluating success
Use of Existing Tools

• Common theme of limited resources• Make maximum use of existing tools?

– CALMM5, CALWRF, CALRUC, CALETA, CA– Converts data to common file formats (3D.DA

2D.DAT) for all prognostic models

– Retains wind data unchanged from prognosti

interpolates scalars to wind grid point location

• Wind rose software

– Annual, seasonal, diurnal wind roses

• Meteorological evaluation software

– Quantitative statistical measures
Two Step Evaluation Proce

• Step 1: Evaluate gridded meteorological 

performance separately from dispersion mperformance

– There will likely be a large sensitivity of dispe

model to met database

– Separately determine best available dataset f

parameter

– Sensitivity of prognostic model parameters– Use of NCEP products (e.g., RUC fields)– Sensitivity of dispersion model to different va

• Model parameterizations and grid resolution

• Step 2: Evaluate dispersion model perfor

with gridded dataset vs. obs met data
Evaluation Variables

• Determine available observational datase• Evaluate all meteorological variables

– Wind speed, wind direction

• Frequency of light wind speeds, etc.• Vertical wind and temperature structure

– Temperature & relative humidity– Micrometeorological parameters– Solar radiation– Cloud cover and ceiling height– Precipitation

• Allow for potential use of sub-hourly prog

data
Metrics to Evaluate Succes

• How best to determine what dispersion m

results are good enough?

– Consistency with results using observational – No under-prediction bias relative to observed 

results?

– Evaluate results under many different types o

conditions

• Coastal• Flat rolling terrain• Mountainous 

– Tracer or other observational datasets? **
# Official Journal C 122A/2006

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 122A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4923 May 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 122A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4923 May 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) |
| 2006/C 122A/1 | Recruitment of an internal auditor — Permanent post — AD 8/AD 9 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)

2006/C 122A/1

Recruitment of an internal auditor — Permanent post — AD 8/AD 9

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN

---

III Notices

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop)

| 23.5.2006 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CA 122/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.5.2006

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CA 122/1

---

Recruitment of an internal auditor — Permanent post — AD 8/AD 9

(2006/C 122 A/01)

The European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (Cedefop) is an Agency of the European Union. It provides information on and analysis of vocational education and training systems, policies, research and practice. As the European Union's reference centre for vocational education and training, Cedefop provides services for the European Commission, the European Union Member States and the social partners as well as for the associated countries of Norway and Iceland. The Candidate Countries are also associated with its activities. Cedefop is based in Thessaloniki, northern Greece.

Cedefop is seeking to recruit an internal auditor. The vacancy notice can be downloaded from our website http://www.cedefop.europa.eu

A detailed curriculum vitae (preferably European format), certificates, recommendation letters and a cover note should be sent by registered post to the following address:

| Cedefop |
| --- |
| European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training |
| c/o J. Kiorpelidou |
| Ref.: 4312/18/2006 |
| PO Box 22427 — Finikas |
| GR-55102 Thessaloniki |

Cedefop

European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training

c/o J. Kiorpelidou

Ref.: 4312/18/2006

PO Box 22427 — Finikas

GR-55102 Thessaloniki

The closing date for applications is 15 June 2006 (date of post registration).

---
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Report) of Blackbird Petroleum Corporation (the Company) for the period ended
January 31, 2010, each of the undersigned Antonio Treminio, the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Accounting Officer, of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of each of the undersigneds knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated:
	March 18, 2010/s/ Antonio TreminioAntonio Treminio, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

_________________

NO. 09-15-00069-CV

_________________

IN RE MARK HARDING

________________________________________________________________________

Original Proceeding

________________________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Mark Harding filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking relief from pretrial rulings made by the judge presiding over a case filed in the 253rd District 

Court and assigned to the County Court at Law of Liberty County, Texas. In three 

issues, Harding contends the trial court abused its discretion (1) by denying a 

motion to compel the real party in interest, Bradley A. Butcher, to respond to 

Harding’s request for disclosure, (2) by granting a motion for continuance, and (3) 

by allowing Butcher to file an amended pleading that changed the case’s discovery 

level. Harding asks this Court to compel the trial court to strike Butcher’s 

objections to the request for disclosure, strike the plaintiff’s first amended petition, 
2

and immediately set the case for trial. On March 10, 2015, the visiting judge 

assigned to hear the case signed a scheduling order establishing deadlines for 

pleading and discovery and setting the case for trial on November 2, 2015. 

After reviewing the mandamus petition and record, we conclude that the 

relator failed to establish an abuse of discretion by the trial court for which an 

appeal would not provide an adequate remedy. See In re Prudential Ins. Co. of 

Am., 148 S.W.3d 124, 135-36 (Tex. 2004). Accordingly, we deny the petition for 

writ of mandamus. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a). 

PETITION DENIED. 

PER CURIAM

Submitted on March 25, 2015

Opinion Delivered March 26, 2015

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Horton, JJ.
FPL Port Everglades Energy Center Audra Livergood to: Andrew Parks 11/08/2012 02:58 PM History: This message has been replied to. Dear Andrew, In the attached August 31, 2012 cover letter to FPL's Biological Assessment (BA) and in their BA, FPL determined that the proposed action would have no effect on 13 species under NMFS' p urview (see page 2 of attached letter). Furthermore, FPL determined that the proposed action "may affect, and is likely to adversely affect" green, loggerhead, and hawksbill sea turtles. Because the ESA Section 7 consultation is between NMFS and EPA, we need to know if EPA concurs with FPL's determinations. We also need to know if EPA concurs with FPL's determination that the proposed action "will not jeopardize the continued existence" of green, loggerhead, and hawksbill sea turtles. In addition, we need a statement from the EPA requesting formal consultation with NMFS. You may provide your response in an e-mail. Thank you, Audra

-- Audra Livergood Marine Resource Manager N OAA National Marine Fisheries Service SERO Protected Resources Division Fort Lauderdale Field Office 299 East Broward Blvd., Suite 328 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Office (954) 356-7100 Fax (954) 356-7108

For if one link in nature's chain might be lost, another might be lost, until the whole of things will vanish by piecemeal. Thomas Jefferson

PEEC_Biological Assessment_2012_Rev. 0.pd f PEEC_Biological Assessment_2012_Rev.
Exhibit 4.1


 


 


 





	
        No. OS-X

        

        Ordinary Shares

         
	
        OS-X מס'

        

        מניות רגילות
        

         

	
        אנטרה ביו
        בע"מ

        

        ENTERA BIO LTD.

         

	SHARE CERTIFICATE	תעודת מניה
	 	 
	
        Authorized Capital: 10,770

        

        divided into:

        

        1,000,000 Ordinary Shares of NIS 0.01 nominal value each;

        

        25,000 Series A Preferred Shares of NIS 0.01 nominal value each

        

        35,000 Series B Preferred Shares of NIS 0.01 nominal value each

        

        17,000 Series B-1 Preferred Shares of NIS 0.01 nominal value
        each

         

         

        This is to Certify

         

        that:

        

        is the Registered Holder of XXX Ordinary Shares of

        

        NIS 0.01 nominal value each

         

        fully paid up in accordance with the Articles of Association
        of the Company

         

        Given Under the Common Seal of the Company

         

        This day of ,

         

        Director:

         
	
        ההון הרשום
הינו: 10,770

        מחולק ל:

        

        1,000,000 מניות
        רגילות בנות 0.01 ₪ ע.נ כל אחת;

        

        25,000 מניות
        בכירות א' בנות 0.01 ₪ ע.נ כל אחת.

        

        35,000 מניות
        בכירות ב' בנות 0.01 ₪ ע.נ כל אחת.

        

        17,000 מניות
        בכירות ב'-1 בנות 0.01 ₪ ע.נ כל
        אחת.

         

         

        זאת לעדות

         

        כי :

        

        הוא
        הבעל הרשום של XXXX מניות
        רגילות

        

        בנות 0.01 ₪
        ע.נ כל אחת

         

        ושתמורתן
        שולמה במלואה, בהתאם לתקנון
        ההתאגדות של החברה

         

        נערך ונחתם
        בחותמת החברה

         

        ביום בחודש
        ,שנת

         

        מנהל:

         




 


 



    	 



    	 



    

 


 


	
        





THE SHARES REPRESENTED HEREBY HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER
        THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AND HAVE BEEN ACQUIRED FOR INVESTMENT AND NOT WITH A VIEW TO, OR IN CONNECTION WITH, THE SALE OR DISTRIBUTION
        THEREOF. NO SUCH TRANSFER MAY BE EFFECTED WITHOUT AN EFFECTIVE REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATED THERETO OR AN OPINION OF COUNSEL
        IN A FORM SATISFACTORY TO THE COMPANY THAT SUCH REGISTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933.
Page 38 of 41



                                   EXHIBIT 21

PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES
     (Included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Wholly-owned)

National Presto Industries, Inc.
Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

         Its Subsidiaries:
                  National Holding Investment Company
                  Wilmington, Delaware (A Delaware Corporation)

                  Its Subsidiaries:
                           Presto Manufacturing Company
                           Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                           Its Division:
                                Presto Products Manufacturing Company
                                Alamogordo, New Mexico

                           Century Leasing and Liquidating, Inc. (Inactive)
                           Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)

                           Its Subsidiary:
                                Presto Export, Inc. (Inactive)
                                Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)

                           Jackson Sales and Storage Company
                           Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                           Canton Sales & Storage Company
                           Canton, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                           Presto Export, Ltd. (Inactive)
                           Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands
                           (A Virgin Islands Corporation)

                  National Defense Corporation
                  Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

                  AMTEC Corporation
                  Janesville, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

                  Presto Absorbent Products, Inc.
                  Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

                  NPI Export Corporation (Inactive)
                  Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)
#### VENN v. STATE.

No. 17947.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 19, 1936.

*348Gus Morris, of Gilmer, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the-unlawful possession of whisky; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for three years.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
**Exhibit 23.2**

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

​

​

​

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-231247 on Form N-2 of WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. of our report dated March 31, 2022, with respect to the consolidated statement of assets, liabilities and members’ equity of WHF STRS Ohio Senior Loan Fund LLC, including the consolidated schedule of investments, as of December 31, 2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in members’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, and the related notes, which report appears in the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2021 of WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. dated March 31, 2022.

​

​

​

/s/Crowe LLP

Crowe LLP

​

New York, New York

March 31, 2022

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22360]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

National Park Service

[NPS-WASO-WI-00058; PPMPSAS1Y.Y0000; PPWOWMADY0]

Designation of Insignia for the National Park Service, Youth and 
Young Adult Programs

AGENCY: National Park Service, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of designation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice serves as official designation of the insignia for 
the National Park Service, Youth and Young Adult programs. This 
publication accomplishes the official designation of the insignia now 
in use by the National Park Service.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Crispin, Youth Programs 
Division, Workforce and Inclusion Directorate; 1849 C Street NW, Mail 
Stop: 2353, Washington, DC 20240, Email: [email protected], Work 
Cell: 913-727-0766.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For more than five decades, the National 
Park Service (NPS) has recognized the significance of Youth and Young 
Adult Programs. These programs encompass a wide range of goals and 
objectives, both within individual parks and on a broader scale through 
partnerships with non-profit organizations, businesses, corporations, 
and various government agencies. The primary focus of these programs is 
to engage kids, teenagers, young adults up to the age of 30, as well as 
military veterans 35 years old and younger.
    The insignia depicted below has been designated as the official 
uniform patch and logo for the Youth and Young Adult program. 
Commencing from September 2024 the National Park Service aims to 
implement the new insignia. The Director of the National Park Service 
holds authority over the usage of the insignia.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN30SE24.002

    In making this prescription, notice is hereby given that whoever 
manufactures, sells, or possesses this insignia, or any colorable 
imitation thereof, or photographs or prints or in any other manner 
makes or executes any engraving, photograph or print, or impression in 
the likeness of this insignia, or any colorable imitation thereof, 
without written authorization from the United States Department of the 
Interior is subject to the penalty provisions of 18 U.S.C. 701.
    Authority: Protection of Official Badges, Insignia, etc., 18 U.S.C. 
701.

Jamie Crispin,
Youth Program Manager, Youth Programs Division, Workforce and Inclusion 
Directorate.
[FR Doc. 2024-22360 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4312-52-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3243 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3243

    To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver 
  authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly 
                            (PACE programs).

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2015

  Mr. Smith of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. Blumenauer, Mr. Brady of 
    Texas, Mr. McDermott, Mr. Boustany, Mr. Pascrell, Mr. Kelly of 
 Pennsylvania, Mr. Tonko, Mr. Lance, Mr. Bilirakis, Mr. Barletta, Mr. 
 Costello of Pennsylvania, Mr. Fitzpatrick, Ms. Michelle Lujan Grisham 
 of New Mexico, Mr. LoBiondo, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Higgins, Mr. Rothfus, 
  Mr. Kennedy, and Mr. Neal) introduced the following bill; which was 
  referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the 
   Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver 
  authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly 
                            (PACE programs).

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY REGARDING PACE PROGRAMS.

    Subsection (d)(1) of section 1115A of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1315a) is amended by striking ``and 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)'' and 
inserting ``1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), and 1934 (other than subsections 
(b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of such section)''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 13.2 
 CERTIFICATION
 
 The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.  Pedro José Moreno Cantalejo, the Vice President of Administration and Finance (Principal Financial Officer) of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:
 
 1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
 
 2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V.
 
 Date: April 25, 2013
  /s/ Pedro José Moreno CantalejoName: Pedro José Moreno CantalejoVice President of Administration and Finance (Principal Financial Officer)
#### In the Matter of the General Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors of Panzarella Construction Co., Inc., Assignor, to David Peterman, Assignee.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

January 30, 1958.

*Frederick Behr, Jr.,*for petitioner.

*Herbert Z. Reinberg*for assignee.

James W. Bailey, J.

Petitioner makes application to compel the assignee for the benefit of creditors to indorse a check for $1,500 to enable him to receive payment thereof pursuant to an assignment executed in his favor more than four months prior to the assignment for the benefit of creditors.

The assignee for the benefit of creditors opposes the application upon the grounds (1) that the prior assignment was not recorded as required by section 15 of the Lien Law and (2) that the assignment is invalid pursuant to section 15 of the Stock Corporation Law.

There appears to be no merit to the assignee’s first contention because he is in the position of a judgment creditor who *212may not attack the prior assignment upon the ground that it was not filed. Petitioner is entitled to a lien upon the funds received from the construction project for which it furnished the material. Such a lien is a lien upon funds which are the fruits of its contribution and is intended to be preferred over the claims of general creditors irrespective of its filing. (See *Edison Elec. Illuminating Co.*v. *Frick Co.,*221 N. Y. 1.)

The assignee’s second contention raises issues of fact as to whether the assignor corporation was insolvent or its insolvency was imminent when the first assignment was made and as to whether the first assignment was made with intent to give a preference to one creditor over another. If it were insolvent or about to become insolvent and made the assignment with intent to create a preference, the assignment is invalid. (See Stock Corporation Law, § 15; *John 8. Lane & Son, Inc.*v. *County of Westchester,*248 N. Y. 298.)

Under the circumstances the court may not compel the indorsement of the check and thereby enforce the prior assignment which may be invalid pursuant to section 15 of the Stock Corporation Law.

Application denied.

Submit order.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brad Bernstein, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
/s/ BRAD BERNSTEINBrad Bernstein,President and Chief Financial OfficerMay 21, 2010