alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
 
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(c)


Selected Consolidated Financial Information

     Set forth below is certain selected historical consolidated financial data
with respect to Eckerd Corporation. As it relates to 1992 through 1995, such
information was excerpted or derived from financial information contained in
Eckerd's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended February 3, 1996
("Eckerd's Form 10-K"). Regarding fiscal 1996, such information, which is
unaudited, is excerpted from Eckerd's financial information for such fiscal
year. The information below represents Eckerd's continuing operations, and
excludes the results of Insta-Care Holdings, Inc. (sold November 15, 1994), the
Vision Group Operations (sold effective January 30, 1994) and any reserves
established for future store closings. In addition, the financial information
for fiscal 1995 is presented on a comparable 52-week basis. More comprehensive
financial information is included in Eckerd's Form 10-K and other documents
filed by Eckerd with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The financial
information that follows is qualified in its entirety by reference to Eckerd's
Form 10-K and such other documents, including the financial statements and
related notes therein.


                      ECKERD CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
                  SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

<TABLE> 
<CAPTION> 
                                            1996           1995          1994           1993         1992
                                            ----           ----          ----           ----         ----
                                                           (in thousands, except percentages)
<S>                                       <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C> 
Statement of Operations Data:
  Sales and other operating revenue....   $5,376,221    $4,902,789    $4,446,728    $4,060,614    $3,770,879
  Gross profit.........................    1,183,373     1,101,174     1,020,868       955,880       935,478
  Earnings before interest expense
      and taxes........................      213,950       196,441       171,615       150,277       128,063

Other Operating and Drugstore Data:
  EBITDA(1)............................      308,136       279,592       247,985       231,280       216,695
  Comparable drugstore sales growth....          7.8%          8.8%          8.1%          6.1%          3.1%
  Average sales per selling square
      foot (in dollars)................          383           336           325           302           283
---------------------------
</TABLE> 
(1) EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
    amortization. While the Company believes that EBITDA is a key measure of
    assessing operating performance and cash flow, EBITDA is not intended as a
    substitute for other statement of operations data prepared in accordance
    with generally accepted accounting principles.
To: Rochelle Boyd/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

From: Billy_Nichols@URSCorp.com

Date: 08/03/2011 05:37PM

Cc: bgriffin@scepterinc.com

Subject: NAICS Code for Scepter, Inc.

Rochelle,

Brian Griffin ask that I provide you the NAICS Code for the Scepter facilities.

It is 331314.

Also, the SIC code, if needed, is 3341.

Billy R. Nichols, P.E.

URS Corporation

1000 Corporate Centre Drive, Suite 250

Franklin, TN 37067

office 615

- 771

- 2480

direct line 615

- 224

- 2135

fax 615

- 771

- 2459

cellular 615

- 202

- 6556

Email: billy_nic hols@urscorp.com
EX-35.3
(logo) Rialto
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT


March 1, 2013


To:  Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc., as Depositor
     Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer

2012 Annual Statement of Servicer Compliance (Item 1123)

Name of Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificate Series

* WFRBS 2012-C8

(Referred to herein as "Security Agreement" or "Security Agreements")

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Rialto Capital Advisors, LLC, as
special servicer (the "Special Servicer") herein certifies to the following:

1. All servicing activities and performance of such servicing activities under
   each of the Security Agreements are performed on behalf of the Special
   Servicer.

2. A review of the servicing activities and performance by the Special Servicer
   for the period of August 7, 2012, to December 31, 2012, in accordance with
   the servicing agreements applicable to each Security Agreement has been
   conducted under my supervision.

3. To the best of my knowledge, the Special Servicer has fulfilled all of its
   obligations under the terms of the Security Agreements, in all material
   respects for the period of August 7, 2012, to December 31, 2012. If there has
   been a failure to fulfill any such obligations in any material respect, each
   failure and the nature and status thereof has been specifically identified
   herewith.


Certified by: /s/ Thekla Salzman
              Thekla Salzman
              Chief Administrative Officer

Date: March 1, 2013
# Official Journal C 38E/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.038.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 38E |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5511 February 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CE2012.038.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 38E

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5511 February 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2012/C 038E/01 | Position (EU) No 3/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to adoption of the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards distribution of food products to the most deprived persons in the UnionAdopted by the Council on 23 January 2012 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2012/C 038E/01

Position (EU) No 3/2012 of the Council at first reading with a view to adoption of the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005 and (EC) No 1234/2007 as regards distribution of food products to the most deprived persons in the UnionAdopted by the Council on 23 January 2012

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### In the Matter of the Arbitration between List Industries Corporation et al., Petitioners, and Herman Gelber et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, New York County,

May 8, 1958.

*O’Brien, Driscoll & Rafferty*for List Industries Corp., petitioner.

*Archie Weltman*for Marcus Loew Booking Agency, petitioner.

*736
      *Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Sunderland S Kiendl*for City Entertainment Corp., petitioner.

*Schwarts S Frohlich*for Fabian Theatres Corp., petitioner.

*Boyall, Koegel, Harris S Caskey*for Roxy Theatre, Inc., petitioner.

*Jerome B. Golden*for American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc., petitioner.

*George Moskowits*for Radio City Music Hall Corp., petitioner.

*Cooper, Ostrm S De Vareo*for Herman G-elber and others, respondents.

Thomas A. Aubelio, J.

The respondents as trustees of the pension and welfare funds of the named union have brought action against the petitioners employers to recover from them the contributions required to be made pursuant to the basic agreement and the trust agreement. Petitioners now move to stay that action and to compel arbitration, and the application is based on the contention that the controversy arising among the parties and that involved in the action are identical and that it is arbitrable under the collective bargaining agreement. The board of trustees, consisting of an equal number of members representing management and labor, has authorized the suit. The right to recover the required contributions is independent of the collective bargaining agreement even though it may rest thereon as well as on the trust agreement and is independent of the arbitration provision contained in the collective bargaining agreement on which petitioners rely. The right of action does not belong to the union. Apart therefrom, no controversy is projected or is claimed or shown to exist as to the basis of the obligation or of its measurement. The complaint in the action rests on the collective bargaining agreement, as amended, the provisions thereof fixing the obligation in issue and the measure thereof and the failure to pay upon demand. In the present posture as presented, therefore, the trustees are suing upon a simple debt embracing no dispute save the amount due upon the agreement as written and, as to that, it is not even suggested any controversy exists.

The motion is denied.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Morry Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





By:
            /s/ MORRY F.
      RUBINMorry
      F. RubinChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      16, 2009
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION

I, John R. Schwab, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of NCO Group, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) intentionally omitted;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of
the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: May 16, 2008



/s/ John R. SchwabJohn R. SchwabChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
Ex 10-2





 







Exhibit 10.2



AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO



THE PARK CITY GROUP, INC.



SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED



2011 EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, the Board of Directors and stockholders
of Park City Group, Inc. (the “Company”) have adopted the Park City Group, Inc.
Second Amended and Restated 2011 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the
“Plan”);


 


WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms and conditions of
the Plan, a total of 200,000 shares of the common stock, par value
$0.01 per share, of the Company (the “Common
Stock”) have been
reserved for issuance under the Plan;


 


WHEREAS,
the Company desires to increase the number of shares issuable under
the Plan to 300,000 shares; and


 


WHEREAS,
the Plan permits the Company’s Board of Directors to amend
the Plan from time to time to increase the number of shares of
Common Stock authorized for issuance under the Plan.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, the following amendments and modifications are hereby
made a part of the Plan:


 


1.   The fourth paragraph of the Plan,
appearing under the heading “Number of Shares Available for
Issuance Under the Plan,”
shall be, and hereby is, amended to increase the aggregate number
of shares of Common Stock issuable thereunder to 300,000, and such
section is thereby to read as follows:


 


“The
total number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the
terms of the Plan is 300,000; provided, however, this Plan may
be amended by the Board of Directors to increase the number of
shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the
Plan.”


 


2.
  In all other respects, the Plan, as amended, is hereby
ratified and confirmed and shall remain in full force and
effect.


 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 1 to
the Park City Group, Inc. Second Amended and Restated 2011 Employee
Stock Purchase Plan as of August 3, 2017.



 


	
 

	
 

	
 


	

PARK
CITY GROUP, INC.


	
 

	
 


	

By:
/s/ Randall K.
Fields

	
 

	
 


	


Name:  Randall K. Fields



Title: Chief Executive Officer
EX-10.51





 Exhibit 10.51 

 
 



 
 October 11, 2017 

Woodford Investment Management Limited 
  

	Re:	Payment of certain fees associated with the Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization 

 Ladies and
Gentlemen: 
 This Side Letter (“Side Letter”) is entered into by and between Evofem Biosciences, Inc. (“Evofem”) and
Woodford Investment Management Limited (“WIM”), acting as agent for and on behalf of each CF Woodford Equity Income Fund, a sub fund of CF Woodford Investment Fund, Omnis Income & Growth Fund, a sub fund of Omnis Portfolio
Investments ICVC, and Woodford Patient Capital Trust Plc, as of the date first written above. 
 It is hereby agreed that Evofem shall pay
the reasonable legal fees of Mischon de Reya LLP, incurred by WIM, in connection with the negotiation of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger and Reorganization, by and between Neothetics, Inc., Nobelli Merger Sub, Inc., and Evofem (the
“Merger Agreement”) and related transactions, in an amount not to exceed, in the aggregate, £50,000, plus value added tax associated with said legal fees. 

Yours sincerely, 
  

			
	Evofem Biosciences, Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Jay File

		 	Jay File
		 	Chief Financial Officer
#### FARRELL v. STATE.

No. 16210.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1934.

Wm. M. Cramer, of. Dallas, for appellant.

' W. C. Dowdy, Co. Atty., and Leon O. Moses, Asst. Co. Atty., both of McKinney, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Conviction is for violating the provisions of article 1359, P. C., inhibiting the introduction of Johnson Grass; punishment, a fine of $1,000.

Provision is made in article 418, C. C. P., for the substitution of a lost indictment or information. From the present record it appears that on the 14th day of April, 1933, the county attorney presented to the trial court a motion which contained an averment to the effect that on the 6th day of April, 1933, there had been legally presented against appellant a complaint and information charging him with the offense in. question. It was also averred that the complaint and information had been lost or mislaid, and that the complaint and information attached to the motion were substantial copies of the instruments that had been lost. The court, on the hearing of the motion, ordered that the substitution be made. The order authorizing the substitution does not appear to have been entered upon the minutes of the court. We find in the transcript an order of substitution and the suggestion of the county attorney, with the certificate of the clerk to the effect that said instruments were filed on April 14, 1933. Under the statute (article 418, supra), and the decisions of this court, the record must show that the suggestion to substitute had been presented in open court, and that there had been spread on the minutes of the court the court’s order that the instrument presented be substituted for the original arid lost complaint and information. See Morris v. State, 96 Tex. Cr. R. 337, 257 S. W. 899; Carter v. State, 41 Tex. Cr. R. 608, 58 S. W. 80; Burrage v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 44 S. W. 169.

The opinion is expressed that the court should have submitted to the jury the question as to whether the witness Mrs. R.' L. Farrell was an accomplice. The state , contends that the special charge on the subject is not sufficiently authenticated to present the matter for review. We pretermit a discussion of this question. However, if another trial be had, the issue should be submitted to the jury. . . i ■

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals' apd approved by the court.
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 08-407 Date: December 16, 2008

Subject: Federal Benefits: Changes to Blue Cross Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan 

Standard Option Non-emergency Surgery Benefits Provided by 

Out-of-Network Physicians 

Background

On December 5, 2008, OPM asked Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program 

carriers to reevaluate their benefits for non-emergency surgical procedures (including 

maternity) provided by non-participating providers for the 2009 contract term. We took 

this action in response to concerns over a change in coverage in the Blue Cross Blue 

Shield (BCBS) Standard Option out-of-network reimbursement that would have 

established a $7,500 co-pay for out-of-network surgeries. This BAL announces benefit 

changes for BCBS Standard Option non-emergency surgical procedures provided by nonparticipating providers. 

Revised Benefits

The Blue Cross Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan revised their 2009 Standard Option 

benefit provision for non-emergency surgeries. No other carriers are changing 

benefits for 2009. 

Attachment I contains the letter BCBS will send to all their enrollees explaining this 

benefit change. The letter also contains updated brochure information. Please distribute 

this letter and updated brochure information to your employees. 

Brochures

BCBS will send letters and updated brochure information to its enrollees. 

Please print Attachment I and include it in the stock pile of Blue Cross Blue Shield 

Service Benefit Plan (RI 71-005) brochures you have at your agency. 

We have revised the online brochure at 

www.opm.gov/insure/health/planinfo/2009/brochures/71-005.pdf. 

2009 Guide to Federal Benefits

Attachment II includes revisions for the 2009 Guides to Federal Benefits. Please print 
this attachment and include it in the stock pile in all the Guides to Federal Benefits you 

have at your agency. 

We have revised the PDF versions of the Guides at 

www.opm.gov/insure/health/planinfo/guides/index.asp 

FEHB Plan Comparison Tool (www.opm.gov/insure/health/search/plansearch.aspx) 

We have revised the benefit information in the plan comparison tool to reflect the Blue 

Cross Blue Shield Service Benefit Plan Standard Option change. 

Frequently Asked Questions

Attachment III provides a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about the belated 

enrollment opportunity. Please distribute this to your employees. 

We will post this BAL and the attachments on our website at 

http://www.opm.gov/insure/openseason/index.asp. 

Thank you for your assistance. 

 Sincerely, 

 Kathleen M. McGettigan 

Deputy Associate Director 

 Center for Retirement and Insurance Services 

2
|         1.  The      Report is in full compliance with reporting requirements of Section 13(a)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;  and |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         2.      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the      Corporation. |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Sustut      Exploration, Inc. |
|--------|-------------------------------|
|   |                          |
|   | /s/ Andrey      Oks           |
|   | Andrey      Oks               |
|   | President                     |