alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22633]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Issuance of Statement of Federal Financial Accounting 
Standards 64, Management's Discussion and Analysis: Rescinding and 
Replacing SFFAS 15

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards 
Advisory Board has issued Statement of Federal Financial Accounting 
Standards (SFFAS) 64 titled Management's Discussion and Analysis: 
Rescinding and Replacing SFFAS 15.

ADDRESSES: SFFAS 64 is available on the FASAB website at http://www.fasab.gov/accounting-standards/. Copies can be obtained by 
contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive 
Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call 
(202) 512-7350.
    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3511(d); Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. 1001-1014.

    Dated: September 27, 2024.
Monica R. Valentine,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-22633 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
Exhibit 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Reliance Bancshares, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or
omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;b)
    
    [Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained in SEC
Release 33-8238; 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: March 14, 2008
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Jerry S. Von RohrName:
    
    Jerry S. Von RohrTitle:
    
    Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Precision Castparts
Corp. (the Company) for the fiscal year ended April 2, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, William D. Larsson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                         
|-------------------------
|Date: June 14, 2006      
|                         
|/s/ WILLIAM D. LARSSON   
|William D. Larsson       
|Senior Vice President and
|Chief Financial Officer
# PM -20ID-OI'12- Contacts. With whom outside the FAAhasthis proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted 

### Date Response Nlltjonal Business Ail"l.'raftAssociation EliColti 8/17/09 

## - Regionlll Airline Association Dave Lotterer 8117/09 Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 8/17/09

- ATA Craig Fabian 8/17/09 

## - ATA MLopez 8f17/09 

## - 09129/06
**Exhibit 31.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

I, James H. Dennedy, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Agilysys, Inc.; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations andcash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; 

4. The registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: 

a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

b) Designed such internalcontrol over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financialstatements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

c) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and 

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internalcontrol over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: June 14, 2011
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the hhgregg, Inc. (the Company)
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dennis L. May, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Dennis L. MayDennis L. May President and Chief Executive Officer


Dated: August 7, 2009
Exhibit 32.01    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rostock Ventures Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory Rotelli, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Gregory Rotelli By: Gregory Rotelli Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: May 20, 2011  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal EmployeesRetirement Group Life Health Benefits RetirementSystem Insurance Program System

United States

Office ofPersonnel ManagementThe Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance ServicePayroll Office Letter

                                                  Number: P-99–23 Date: October 26, 1999

Subject: Modernizing Today –Issue Three

OPM’s Retirement Systems Modernization effort is making significant progress.  Two of theprototypes, the Benefits Calculator a new tool that will calculate various kinds of CSRS orFERS benefits and the Benefits Booklet, are in use.  This is mad possible through the hardwork of our Stakeholder group including the Agency Advisory Committee and the consistentcommunication and feedback we have received from the payroll offices.  We want yourcontinued feedback and we have enclosed the third volume of the bulletin ModernizingToday.

Your answers on the feedback portion of Modernizing Today are greatly appreciated. If youhave any questions, or to request copies, please contact the Retirement and InsuranceService’s Business Systems Reengineering Division on  (202) 606-0607.

Robert A. Yuran, ChiefFinancial Policy StaffRetirement and Insurance Service                       

Enclosure
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B




CERTIFICATION
    PURSUANT TO
    18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
    OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Form 10-Q




/s/  John
    R. Sult
#### LAUBHAN et al. v. PEORIA LIFE INS. CO.

No. 4228.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

April 26, 1937.

E. C. Gray, of Higgins, for appellants.

Morgan, Culton, Morgan & Britain, of Amarillo, for appellee.

STOKES, Justice.

This case involves the question of whether or not a claim against a decedent’s estate in administration which arose upon a debt and lien created before the enactment of article 3515a, Vernon’s Texas Statutes 1936, General Laws 42d Leg. (1931) c. 52, p. 79 et seq., and maturing after that act took effect is controlled by, and should be presented and prosecuted under, the provisions of that act or under the law as it existed at the time the indebtedness under which the claim arose was created. Being unable to agree on that question, we certified the case to the Supreme Court upon two questions pertaining to the jurisdiction of the district court, as follows:

> “1." Did the District Court of Lipscomb County have original jurisdiction of appel-lee’s cause of, action without a previous claim having been filed with and rejected by the administratrix, under the facts recited above ?

> “2. If not, did such Court have jurisdiction after appellee’s claim for a preferred lien under article 3515a had been rejected by the Administratrix, as set out above?” Laubhan v. Peoria Life Ins. Co. (Tex.Com.App.) 102 S.W.(2d) 399, 402.

The holding of the Supreme Court is to the effect that the law prevailing at the time the indebtedness and lien were created is the law under which the claim against the estate should be prosecuted and that the district court does not have jurisdiction of the cause. The negative answer to the first question is qualified, however, by the suggestion that, if the claim is prosecuted under the former law and appellee’s pleadings are so amended as to present litigable issues concerning the equitable features involved, the district court would have jurisdiction.

We construe the holding to mean that, if the pleadings are so arranged as to present for adjudication the appellee’s claim of es-toppel and equities as between the homestead and other land involved and to show, also, that the requirements of the former probate law have been complied with, a case would- be presented of which the district court would have jurisdiction and the whole case would fall under the recognized exception to exclusive jurisdiction of the probate court-as being one in which that court could not decree adequate relief. Cannon, Adm’r, v. McDaniel et al., 46 Tex. 303; Western Mortgage & Inv. Co. v. Jackman, 77 Tex. 622, 14 S.W. 305; George et al. v. Ryon, 94 Tex. 317, 60 S.W. 427.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed with instructions that, if the pleadings are not made to conform to the holding of the Supreme Court in its opinion upon the certified questions, the cause should be dismissed.
Premanufacture Notice (PMN) for P

- 10

- 0 5 88

A pubic copy of the sanitized PMN for these substances is not available.

For further information on obtaining a copy of this document
contact:

Kenneth Moss, Chemical Control Division (7405M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460

- 0001

Telephone: 202

- 564

- 9232

Email: Moss.Kenneth@epa.gov
### The Honorable Ru ssell G. Clark, United States District Judge 1 

### for the Western District of Missouri, adopting the report an d recomm endations of the Honorable James C. England, United State s Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Missouri.



# United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 96-2217

___________ Steven Anderson, * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the U.S. Parole Commission; United * Western District of Missouri. States of America, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. *

___________ Submitted: March 21, 1997 Filed: April 7, 1997

___________ Before HANSEN, MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Steven Anderson, a federal inmate, appeals from the district court's 1 dismissal without prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2 241 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties ' submissions, we conclude that the district court's judgment was correct an d that an extended discussion is not warranted. Accordingly, we affirm. Se e 8th Cir.

### -2-

R. 47B. We deny Anderson's appellate motions to supplement the record and for release. A true copy.
Attest: CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 194 (Monday, October 7, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81142-81144]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23083]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of Foreign Assets Control


Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action

AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets 
Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have 
been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked 
Persons List (``SDN List'') based on OFAC's determination that one or 
more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are 
blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in 
transactions with them.

DATES: See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for effective date(s).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: OFAC: Lisa M. Palluconi, Acting 
Director, tel.: 202-622-2490; Associate Director for Global Targeting, 
tel.: 202-622-2420; Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202-622-
2480; Assistant Director for Regulatory Affairs, tel.: 202-622-4855; or 
the Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 
202-622-2490.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Electronic Availability

    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions 
programs are available on OFAC's website (https://www.treasury.gov/ofac).

Notice of OFAC Actions

    On September 27, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and 
interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following 
persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed 
below.
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[[Page 81143]]

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07OC24.000


[[Page 81144]]


[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN07OC24.001


    Dated: October 1, 2024.
Lisa M. Palluconi,
Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of 
the Treasury.
[FR Doc. 2024-23083 Filed 10-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
[No. 44648-7-I.

Division One.

November 13, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. J.T.H., *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 98-8-08085-1, Patricia H. Clark, J., entered April 27, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### ROSE v. STATE.

No. 16962.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1934.

Wilburn Barcus, of Big Spring, for appellant.

Bloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Aus* tin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was tried and convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of one year.

The record is before us without any bills of exception, and the statement of facts is not signed and approved by the trial judge. Therefore the same cannot be considered by this court. In the absence of a statement of facts, we cannot determine the insufficiency of the testimony to warrant the conviction. The indictment appears to be in due form, and, no fundamental error appearing in the record, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Appendix 4-1: 2002 Oklahoma Emissions Inventory

The 2002 Oklahoma Emissions Inventory is available online at 

ftp://ftp.deq.state.ok.us/AQD/Regional_haze_emissions/ 
Appendix 4-2: Technical Support Document for CENRAP Emissions and 

Air Quality Modeling to Support Regional Haze State Implementation 

Plans

To access this document, please go to http://www.cenrap.org/html/projects.php. 

Scroll down to “Completed Technical Support Document.” Below this is “12 Sept 2007 Text” and to the 

right of this is a link to download the document in .pdf format.
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 ofBrigham Exploration Company of our report dated February 27, 2006 relating to the consolidatedfinancial statements as of December 31, 2005 and for the two years in the period ended December 31,2005, which appears in Brigham Exploration Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedDecember 31, 2006. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in suchRegistration Statement./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPHouston, Texas
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 193 (Friday, October 4, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80905]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22883]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute on Aging; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the National 
Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel, October 21, 2024, 10:00 a.m. 
to October 22, 2024, 06:00 p.m., National Institute on Aging, Gateway 
Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published 
in the Federal Register on September 16, 2024, 89 FR 75549.
    The FRN was amended due to a location change from 5601 Fishers Lane 
in Rockville to the National Institute on Aging in Bethesda. The 
meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 30, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-22883 Filed 10-3-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P