alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Attachment B 

Invoice payable to SHPS 

Invoice: OPM0001579 

Invoice Date: 9/20/2007 

Page: 1 of 1 

New payment process effective with this invoice. Outstanding invoices from billings 

prior to October 2007 MUST be paid using previous procedures. 

Bill to: 

Office of Accounts Payable 

Attn: Mark Money 

5338 42nd St. NW 

Room 5710 

Washington DC 20103 

United States 

Customer No: 59999 

Payment Terms: Net 30 

Due Date: 10/20/2007 

EIN 61-1169783 

Amount Due: $243.00 USD original 

For billing questions, please contact Rhonda Payne at (502) 420-5502 or email 

FSAFEDS-billing@shps.com 

Line 1 

Description Dependent Care FSA 01/2006 (Elected $5,000@ 1.5%) 

Quantity 1.00 

Amount Charged* 75.00 

Net Amount $75.00 

Line 2 

Description Health Care FSA 01/2006 (2 participants @ 12 months) 

Quantity 24.00 

Amount Charged* 4.00 

Net Amount $96.00 

Line 3 

Description Health Care FSA 03/2006 (1 participant(s) @ 10 months) 

Quantity 10.00 

Amount Charged* 4.00 

Net Amount $40.00 
 

 

Line 4 

Description Health Care FSA 05/2006 (1 participant(s) @ 8 months) 

Quantity 8.00 

Amount Charged* 4.00 

Net Amount $32.00 

Subtotal: 243.00 

AMOUNT DUE: 243.00 USD 

SHPS Payment Instructions: 

Please refer to Central Contractor’s Registration Database (CCR) for SHPS Banking 

information. We are listed as SHPS Human Resource Solutions DUNS number 

619336860 or you may contact Rhonda Payne at FSAFEDS-billing@shps.com to obtain 

banking information to pay this invoice. 

Remittance Address: 

SHPS, Inc. 

Contract # 0303000009 

9200 Shelbyville Road 

Louisville, KY 40222 

Addenda/Reference: Please include the customer and invoice numbers that are being 

remitted for payment. 

*Per Participant Per Month (PPPM) for Health Care FSAs and yearly for Dependent Care
 

FSAs.
 

This invoice is payable to SHPS.
 

New payment process effective with this invoice.
 

Outstanding invoices from billings prior to October 2007 MUST be paid using pervious
 

procedures.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7784
HOMER W. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden; RODNEY TABRON, Unit Manager, in their individual capacity and personally, Defendants - Appellees, and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Defendant.

No. 96-7933
HOMER W. WALKER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RODNEY TABRON; JOHN J. LAMANNA; CHARLES MASSEY, in their individual capacity and personally, Defendants - Appellees.23Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Malcolm J. Howard, District Judges. (CA-95-940-5-BR, CA-96-488-5-H(1)) Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).4 PER CURIAM:In No. 96-7933, Walker appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Walker v. Tabron , No. CA-96-488-5-H(1) (E.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 1996). In No. 96-7784, Walker appeals from the denial of relief on his Bivens claim alleging that the denial of his furlough request violated his right to equal protection. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 4.1


 


THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON


NEW YORK’S FIRST BANK-FOUNDED 1784 BY ALEXANDER HAMILTON


 


 


2 HANSON PLACE, 12TH FLOOR, BROOKLYN,
N.Y. 11217


 


 


 


November 7, 2017


 


Hennion & Walsh, Inc.


2001 Route 46, Waterview Plaza


Parsippany, New Jersey 07054


 


Smart Trust 351


 


Dear Sirs:


The Bank of New York
Mellon is acting as trustee for the series of Smart Trust set forth above (the “Trust”). We enclosed a list
of the Securities to be deposited in the Trust on the date hereof. The prices indicated therein reflect
our evaluation of such Securities as of close of business on November 6, 2017, in accordance with the valuation method set forth
in the Standard Terms and Conditions of Trust and Trust Agreement. We consent to the reference to The Bank of New York Mellon as
the party performing the evaluations of the Trust Securities in the Registration Statement (No. 333-220272) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission with respect to the registration of the sale of the Trust Units and to the filing of this consent as an
exhibit thereto.


 


 


Very truly yours,


 


	/s/ GERARDO CIPRIANO




Gerardo Cipriano


Vice President
# Fourth Court of Appeals
**San Antonio, Texas**

September 5, 2018

No. 04

- 18

- 00511

- CV

XPO LOGISTICS FREIGH T, LLC

, Appellant

v.

Ralph HERNANDEZ

, Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2017

- CI

- 21366 Honorable Renée Yanta , Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that all pending motions are DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is FURTHER ORDERED t hat Appellee Ralph Hernandez recover all costs on appeal from Appellant XPO Logistics Freight, LLC.

It is so ORDERED on September 5, 2018

.

_____________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 5th day of September, 2018

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-14-00063-CR 

WAYLON HOWARD SKINNER, APPELLANT 

 

V. 

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE 

 

On Appeal from the 30th District Court 

Wichita County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 51,845-A, Robert P. Brotherton, Presiding 

 

May 22, 2014 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK, and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Waylon Howard Skinner pled guilty to aggravated assault causing bodily injury

and, pursuant to a plea bargain, was placed on deferred adjudication for ten years. The 

State subsequently moved to proceed with the adjudication of his guilt and alleged six 

different violations of the terms and conditions of appellant’s community supervision. 

The motion was subsequently heard, and appellant pled true to five of the six alleged 

violations. Upon hearing evidence, the trial court found all of the allegations to be true, 

adjudicated appellant’s guilt, and sentenced him to twelve years confinement. Appellant 
2

argues that the evidence is insufficient to support the allegation to which he failed to 

plead true. We affirm the judgment.

Our review of an order adjudicating guilt is ordinarily limited to determining 

whether the trial court abused its discretion in determining that appellant violated the 

conditions of community supervision. Johnson v. State, 386 S.W.3d 347, 350 (Tex. 

App.—Amarillo 2012, no pet.). Furthermore, proof of only one violation is enough to 

support revocation. Garcia v. State, 387 S.W.3d 20, 26 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012) (stating 

that proof of a single violation will support revocation of probation).

Here, appellant asserts that the State failed to prove the allegation to which he 

pled not true. Yet, he does not deny pleading true to the other five violations alleged in 

the motion to adjudicate guilt. Nor does he attack those pleas of true now or the trial 

court’s findings that the other five allegations were proven true. And, given that proof of 

only one violation supports a decision to adjudicate guilt, we cannot say that the trial 

court abused its discretion in granting the State’s motion, adjudicating appellant’s guilt, 

convicting appellant, and sentencing him. 

Accordingly, the sole issue before us is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed. 

Brian Quinn 

Chief Justice

Do not publish.
yearID sourceTypeID sourceTypePopulation

2015 11 17324

2015 21 378955

2015 31 267424

2015 32 89342

2015 41 281

2015 42 150

2015 43 1891

2015 51 231

2015 52 13055

2015 53 1875

2015 54 3075

2015 61 2952

2015 62 3937
#### Samuel Grauer, Claimant, *v.*State of New York, Defendant.

(Claim No. 33610.)

Court of Claims,

May 20, 1958.

*156
      *David Marcus*for claimant.

*Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney-General (Douglas L. Manley*of counsel), for defendant.

Alexander Del Giorno, J.

This is a motion made by the State for an order permitting the reopening of the trial in this case solely to permit the court to view the scene of the accident involved herein and the operation of the instrumentality which it is alleged caused the accident. The claimant herein opposes the motion on the ground that the information sought to be acquired is not newly discovered evidence.

The facts are briefly as follows: The claimant purchased a ticket for himself and his infant boy which paid for a chair lift ride at Belleayre Mt. Ski Center, Highmount, New York. When he was. ready to descend he stood on the platform provided for that purpose, holding his child in his arms. While he was thus standing he claims that he was struck from the rear by some part of one of the chairs, was thrown by the impact into the moving chair, and taken down to the descending platform, which caused the injuries complained of. During the trial, the attorney for the claimant proposed to the Attorney-General that the court be permitted to view the scene of the accident. The proposal was not then agreeable to the State. After the trial, the Attorney-General made the instant motion, which the claimant now opposes. Whatever the reasons may have been for the Attorney-General to refuse to agree originally and now for the claimant’s attorney to object to the Attorney-General’s application for the same relief, the court may not question. Each party stood upon his rights, the one in asking that the court view the scene and the other in refusing to join in the request. The court finds no fault with either side, but since it is accepted law that the court may not view the scene of an accident or instrumentality unless permitted to do so on the consent of both parties *(Anderson*v. *Leblang,*125 Misc. 820; *Ralph*v. *Southern Ry. Co.,*160 S. C. 229), this motion must be denied and the court will render its decision in accordance with the evidence presented at the trial.

Settle order on notice.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80614]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22746]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 3, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 27, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 407 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-768, K2024-61.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22746 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Jason Kulas, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-4 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.
Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the
distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation
reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an
exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association.



/s/ Jason KulasName:

Jason KulasTitle:

Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2013
United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 99-416 Date: November 4, 1999 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits Program: Humana Medical Plan of

Florida Service Area/Enrollment Code Error

This is to advise you that Humana Medical Plan of Florida codes (P7, P5, 7F, 9D, JH, EE) printed

and distributed their 2000 Plan brochure (RI 73-278) with an error in a service area/enrollment

code association.

Alachua, Bradford, Columbia, Dixie, Gilchrist, Levy, Putnam, and Union counties are listed in the

brochure under code P5 (Jacksonville area), however, they SHOULD be associated with code 7F

(Orlando/Gainesville area). 

People who live or work in the Florida counties of Alachua, Bradford, Columbia, Dixie, Gilchrist,

Levy, Putnam, or Union should select enrollment code 7F (which has a lower premium) - rather

than code P5.

In contract year 1999, Alachua county was associated with P5. The other counties are new for

2000. Those currently enrolled in Alachua county should change to 7F and benefit from the

premium savings.

Agencies are asked to advise their employees of this error.

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division

 ________________________________________________________________________________________

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Wu Qiyou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.





By:

/s/  WU QIYOUDate: May 16, 2011

Name:

Wu QiyouTitle:

Chief Executive Officer





I, David Dodge, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.





By:

/s/  DAVID DODGEDate: May 16, 2011

Name:

David DodgeTitle:

Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GT Solar International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended December 26, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard E. Johnson, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

Date:
February 5, 2010

/s/ RICHARD E. JOHNSON Richard E. Johnson
Vice President of Finance and Corporate Controller
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


---



QuickLinks
#### Ex parte DAY.

No. 17477.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1935.

Geo. M. Hopkins, of Denton, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order made in a habeas corpus hearing remanding the appellant.

 There are no facts in this record. Upon a hearing before the Honorable B. W. Boyd, district judge of Denton county, appellant was remanded to the custody of the sheriff of said county with directions that he be delivered to the agent for the state of Missouri: We have no means of knowing what facts were before the honorable district judge when he made said order. The application for the writ is merely a pleading, and does not prove itself. In the absence of some sufficient reason for holding to the contrary, it becomes the duty of this court to presume the regularity and legality of the actions of trial courts.

The judgment will be affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Clopton House Corporation,  (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Meuse, President and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Joseph Meuse --------------------------- Joseph Meuse President and Chief Executive Officer October 16, 2007
Exhibit 33.1b



|     |  |  |  |                                                                                         
|---- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|LOGO |  |  |  | 260 Interstate North Circle, SE Atlanta, GA 30339-2210
T 770.763.1000 
www.assurant.corn

REPORT ON ASSESSMENT OF COMPLIANCE WITH

§1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii)

of REGULATION AB SERVICING CRITERIA

FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD

JANUARY 1, 2015 TO DECEMBER 31, 2015

American Security Insurance Company, Standard Guaranty Insurance Company and TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc. (collectively, the Asserting Party)
is responsible for assessing compliance for the period of January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 (the Reporting Period) with the servicing criteria set forth in §1122(d)(2)(vi), §1122(d)(4)(xi) and §1122(d)(4)(xii) of
Title 17, §229.1122(d) of the Code of Federal Regulations, (the Applicable Servicing Criteria) which the Asserting Party has concluded are applicable to the insurance escrow servicing activities it performs with respect to all
mortgage backed securities transactions that were registered after January 1, 2006 with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933 (the Platform Transactions). The Asserting Party used the criteria set
forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB to assess the compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria.

The Asserting Party has assessed
its compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period and has concluded that the Asserting Party has complied, in all material respects, with the Applicable Servicing Criteria for the Reporting Period with respect to the
Platform Transactions.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the assessment
of compliance with the Applicable Servicing Criteria as of and for the Reporting Period,

American Security Insurance Company

Standard Guaranty Insurance Company

TrackSure
Insurance Agency, Inc.



|                                                                                             
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ John Frobose                                                                             
|By: John Frobose                                                                             
|President of American Security Insurance Company and Standard Guaranty Insurance Company, and
|Sr. Vice President of TrackSure Insurance Agency, Inc.                                       

Date: February 8, 2016