alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 287/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 287 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5728 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 287

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5728 August 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 287/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7317 — Mercuria/JP Morgan Chase & CO Commodities Trading Business) (1) | 1 |
| 2014/C 287/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7182 — Visteon Corporation/Automotive Electronics Business of Johnson Controls) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 287/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7317 — Mercuria/JP Morgan Chase & CO Commodities Trading Business) (1)

1

2014/C 287/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.7182 — Visteon Corporation/Automotive Electronics Business of Johnson Controls) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 287/03 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 287/03

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 287/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7346 — Montagu Funds/Astorg Funds/Diacine France) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 3 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2014/C 287/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7346 — Montagu Funds/Astorg Funds/Diacine France) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
----

Authorisation of State aid pursuant to Article 61 of the EEA Agreement and Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 to the Surveillance and Court Agreement

EFTA Surveillance Authority decision to propose appropriate measures in relation to a scheme on tax and fee concessions in favour of Norðurál hf. The proposal has been accepted by Iceland.

(2006/C 7/07)

Date of adoption: 

EFTA State: Iceland

Aid No: Case 55362

Title: Tax and fee concessions in favour of the aluminium smelter Norðurál hf. at Grundartangi, Iceland

Acceptance of the appropriate measures by the EFTA State: By letter dated 15 July 2005 the Icelandic authorities accepted the appropriate measures proposed by the Authority.

Objective: The objective of the aid granted by means of scheme on tax and fee concessions is to enhance the attractivenes of the Vesturland region for investment purposes.

Legal basis: The legal instruments of

Budget/Duration: EUR 88,3 million and 10,7 % aid intensity. The scheme has been permitted to be valid until 31 October 2018.

Form of the aid: Tax and fee concessions

Decision: 

The authentic text of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

http://www.eftasurv.int/fieldsofwork/fieldstateaid/stateaidregistry

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the hhgregg, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Jeremy J. Aguilar, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Jeremy J. AguilarJeremy J. Aguilar Chief
Financial Officer


Dated: November 5, 2009
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Anchor Funding Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Morry Rubin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




By:
            /s/ MORRY F.
      RUBINMorry
      F. RubinChief
      Executive OfficerNovember
      13, 2008
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF PRESIDENT AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this Quarterly Report of KabeExploration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the periodending March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erik Ulsteen, President, ChiefFinancial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certifies to the best of myknowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1      |   | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for  the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2      |   | The information contained in such Quarterly Report  on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2009, fairly  presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of  operations of the Company. |

 
| Date: May 20, 2009           |   |
|-----------------------------------|--------|
| /s/  Erik Ulsteen                 |   |
| Erik Ulsteen                      |   |
| President                         |   |
| Chief Financial Officer Secretary |   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22667]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 370 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-724, K2024-17.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22667 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.1.4

CERTIFICATION

I, James K. Sanders, principal financial officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company (the
Company), hereby certify that, based on my knowledge:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 30, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James K. Sanders                                        
|James K. Sanders, Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|(Principal Financial Officer)                               

May 7, 2008
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Annual Report (the Report) of Powell Industries, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Thomas W. Powell, President and
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                           |                                                                           
|-------------------------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:    December 31, 2003 | /s/ THOMAS W. POWELLThomas W. Powell
President and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1
 
 STATEMENT
REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Information Systems
Associates, Inc. (the "Company") for the six months ended June 30, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph P.
Coschera, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/
Joseph P. Coschera
 Joseph P.
Coschera
 Chief
Executive Officer
  Date:
August 13, 2010
 
 This
certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Tom Lem, Defendant.

Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens,

October 31, 1957.

*Henry Gallop*for defendant.

*Frank O’Connor, District Attorney,*for plaintiff.

*36Alfred J. Cawse, Jr., J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the information herein on the ground of double jeopardy.

The facts are undisputed. The defendant was charged with a violation of section 435-5.0 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. On June 13,1957, the defendant appeared for trial in the Magistrates’ Courts and after the case had been called, the defendant answering ready, a witness was sworn and his name and address given. At this point the Magistrate entered into a discussion with counsel and a new complaint was ordered by the Magistrate charging the defendant with a violation of section 1530 of the Penal Law based on the same facts as alleged in the first complaint and the defendant was discharged under the first complaint. The defendant then waived on the new complaint for the Court of Special Sessions reserving his right to plead double jeopardy for this court.

There is no question but that the Magistrates’ Courts had summary and exclusive jurisdiction of the complaint, charging the defendant with a violation of section 435-5.0 of the Administrative Code; that the facts set forth in both complaints are identical and that the defendant was discharged by' the Magistrate of the charge of violation of section 435-5.0. of the Administrative Code.

In *People ex rel. Meyer*v. *Warden*(269 N. Y. 426, 429), the rule is stated: “ It is not necessary in order that a person may avail himself of the constitutional right not to be placed twice in jeopardy for the same offense that the prior trial shall have resulted in a valid judgment either of conviction or acquittal. It is sufficient if the prisoner was actually placed in jeopardy in that he was in danger of having a valid judgment pronounced as the result of the trial.

“ It is not the verdict or judgment which places a prisoner in jeopardy.”

In *People ex rel. Cohen v. Collins*(238 App. Div. 592, 594), the court stated: “ Having once commenced the trial of a defendant upon such a charge, and having sworn a witness, the trial could terminate only either by an acquittal or by a judgment of conviction. ”

In the instant case the swearing of the witness Valente was sufficient to place the defendant in jeopardy and his discharge prevents a trial in the case at bar.

The motion to dismiss is granted.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2959 

To prevent States from counting certain expenditures as State spending 

to reduce TANF work requirements. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2015 

Mrs. NOEM introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To prevent States from counting certain expenditures as 

State spending to reduce TANF work requirements. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘TANF Accountability 

5 and Integrity Improvement Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NO COUNTING OF THIRD-PARTY SPENDING TO 

7 MEET STATE SPENDING REQUIREMENT. 

8 (a) EXCLUSION OF THIRD-PARTY CONTRIBU9 TIONS.—Section 409(a)(7)(B)(i) of the Social Security 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2959 IH

1 Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)(B)(i)) is amended by adding at 

2 the end the following: 

3 ‘‘(VI) EXCLUSION OF THIRD4 PARTY CONTRIBUTIONS.—Such term 

5 shall not include— 

6 ‘‘(aa) for fiscal year 2016, 

7 the amount (if any) by which— 

8 ‘‘(AA) the value of all 

9 goods and services provided 

10 by a source other than the 

11 State or a local government 

12 during the fiscal year; ex13 ceeds 

14 ‘‘(BB) the value of all 

15 such goods and services 

16 claimed by the State as 

17 qualified State expenditures 

18 for fiscal year 2015; 

19 ‘‘(bb) for fiscal year 2017, 

20 the amount (if any) by which— 

21 ‘‘(AA) the value re22 ferred to in subclause 

23 (aa)(AA); exceeds 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2959 IH

1 ‘‘(BB) 50 percent of 

2 the value referred to in sub3 clause (aa)(BB); and 

4 ‘‘(cc) for any fiscal year 

5 after 2017, the value referred to 

6 in subclause (aa)(AA).’’. 

7 (b) EXCLUSION OF EXPENDITURES FOR THE PROVI8 SION OF MEDICAL SERVICES.—Section 409(a)(7)(B)(i) of 

9 such Act (42 U.S.C. 609(a)(7)(B)(i)), as amended by sub10 section (a) of this section, is amended by adding at the 

11 end the following: 

12 ‘‘(VII) EXCLUSION OF EXPENDI13 TURES FOR THE PROVISION OF MED14 ICAL SERVICES.—Such term shall not 

15 include any amount expended for the 

16 provision of medical services.’’. 

17 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

18 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect 

19 on October 1, 2015. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 11-402 Date: August 1, 2011 

Subject: 2011 Federal Benefits Open Season: Rider Information 

This is the second in our series of 2011 Open Season Benefits Administration Letters (BAL). 

This BAL provides information on how to order the Guide to Federal Benefits. 

The Guide to Federal Benefits is the only Federal Benefits Open Season publication agencies 

must pay for and the only one agencies must order through the Government Printing Office 

(GPO) Rider. The other materials for the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS), the Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP), and the 

Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program are free of charge to agencies. 

Attached is the August 2011 Federal Benefits Open Season Rider. Your agency also should 

receive the rider through regular printing officer channels. Please note agencies may order the 

publications on the attached list by riding the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's requisition. 

Field and regional offices must submit their requirements to their department or agency’s 

Washington, DC, area headquarters printing office before the September 16, 2011, cutoff date. 

The headquarters office must submit the consolidated requisitions to the GPO by COB 

September 16, 2011. In order to provide products to our customers on a timely basis, we will not 

extend this cutoff date. We expect the Guides to begin shipping to agency distribution points on 

or before October 24, 2011. 

If you are the headquarters agency Benefits Officer and you do not know which customer service 

team at GPO is assigned to your agency, please call GPO on (202) 512-1239 or use the following 

link for information: http://www.gpo.gov/customers/nams.htm. 

Note: Field and regional offices with questions regarding submitting requisitions to their agency 

printing officer should contact their agency headquarters Benefits Officer. Please follow the link 

for a directory of headquarters level agency benefits officers: http://apps.opm.gov/abo/. 

When ordering the Guide to Federal Benefits, please consider this as a useful resource for new 

employees. The Guide includes important information about an employee’s overall benefit 

package. Therefore, order an amount sufficient for your new employees, benefit fairs, and 

ongoing employee needs. 
Remember, the 2011 Federal Benefits Open Season for the 2012 plan year runs from Monday, 

November 14 through Monday, December 12, 2011. 

Sincerely, 

 John O’Brien 

Director 

Healthcare and Insurance 

2
<PAGE>
 
                  PLAYBOY ENTERPRISES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
                                  EXHIBIT 11
                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                          for the years ended June 30
                   (In thousands, except per share amounts)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
 
                                                 1997        1996        1995
                                                -------     -------     -------
<S>                                             <C>         <C>         <C>
Primary:
-------
 Earnings:
  Net income                                    $21,394     $ 4,252     $   629
                                                =======     =======     =======
 
 Shares:
  Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                            20,318      20,014      19,984
  Assuming exercise of options reduced
   by the number of shares which could
   have been purchased with the proceeds
   from exercise of such options                    514         359         218
                                                -------     -------     -------

  Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding as adjusted                20,832      20,373      20,202
                                                =======     =======     =======
 
  Primary earnings per common share:
   Net income                                   $  1.03  1  $  0.21  1  $  0.03  1
                                                =======     =======     =======
 
Fully Diluted:
-------------
 Earnings:
  Net income                                    $21,394     $ 4,252     $   629
                                                =======     =======     =======
 
 Shares:
  Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding                            20,318      20,014      19,984
  Assuming exercise of options reduced
   by the number of shares which could
   have been purchased with the proceeds
   from exercise of such options                    580         424         268
                                                -------     -------     -------

  Weighted average number of common
   shares outstanding as adjusted                20,898      20,438      20,252
                                                =======     =======     =======
 
  Earnings per common shares assuming
   full dilution:
    Net income                                  $  1.02  1  $  0.21  1  $  0.03  1
                                                =======     =======     =======
 
</TABLE>

 1  This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item 601(b)
    (11) although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB Opinion No.
    15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.
[Nos. 17378-0-III; 18368-8-III; 18720-9-III.

Division Three.

November 14, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Welfare of*Sierra M.S. Jon Strenge, *Appellant,*v. Cheryl McCabe-Woodard, *Respondent.*

Appeals from judgments of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 93-5-00402-3, Neal Q. Rielly and Ellen K. Clark, JJ., entered October 7, 1997 and March 11 and August 17, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Kurtz, C.J., and Kato, J.