alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FILED 

 U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT 

 September 28, 2005 

 THOMAS K. KAHN 

 CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 04-15539

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 04-22572-CV-JLK

EMMA YAIZA DIAZ, 

EBONY ROBERTS, 

ANDRE NEAL BEMBRY, 

AFL-CIO, American Federation of Labor and 

Congress of Industrial Organizations, 

AMERICAN FOUNDATION, of State County and 

Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO, 

FLORIDA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES COUNCIL 79, 

AFSCME, AFL-CIO, 

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, 

AFL-CIO, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

versus 

SECRETARY OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Glenda Hood, 

BROWARD COUNTY SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS, 

Brenda Snipes, DUVAL COUNTY, 

Supervisor of Elections, Jerry Holland, 

MIAMI DADE COUNTY, 

Supervisor of Elections, Constance Kaplan, 

ORANGE COUNTY, 

Supervisor of Elections, Bill Cowles, et al., 

Defendants-Appellees. 
Honorable Richard Mills, United States District Judge for the Central District of Illinois, sitting

*

by designation.

2

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(September 28, 2005)

Before TJOFLAT and BARKETT, Circuit Judges, and MILLS , District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

In this case, the district court dismissed Appellants’ Complaint on the

grounds that Appellants lacked standing to sue. The district court erred in this

conclusion. However, the parties have noted that the Florida law pertaining to

voter registration relevant to this case has been amended during the pendency of

this appeal. The district court judgment is VACATED and the case REMANDED

for further proceedings including the filing of an amended complaint, taking into

account the law as it presently exists.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 14, 2020

No. 04-19-00721-CV

Rufina Reyes YANEZ,

Appellant

v.

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellee

From the 341st Judicial District Court, Webb County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019CVK001146D3

Honorable Rebecca Ramirez Palomo, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

After we granted a first extension, the reporter’s record was due on January 2, 2020. See

Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. On January 6, 2020, court reporter Ana L. Alcantar filed a notice of late 

record and advised this court that Appellant has not paid the fee to prepare the reporter’s record.

We ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within 10 days of the date of this

order that (1) the reporter’s fee has been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the 

reporter’s fee, or (2) appellant is entitled to appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant must file a brief with this 

court within 30 days of the date of this order, and the court will only “consider and decide those 

issues or points [raised in appellant’s brief] that do not require a reporter’s record for a 

decision.” See id. R. 37.3(c). If appellant timely complies with this order, the reporter’s record 

will be due 10 days after appellant files written proof showing compliance with this order. See 

id. R. 35.3(c) (limiting an extension of time to file the record in a regular appeal to thirty days).

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz,

Clerk of Court
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS TAX SOLUT IONS, LLC.

,

Appellant

,

v.

CITY OF EL PASO

Appellee

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 8

- 00 1 26

- C V

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 2014DTX0412 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appell ee ’ s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the b rief until March 1

, 201 9

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE APPELL EE ’ S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. J ose Padilla

, the Appell ee ’ s attorney, prepare the

Appell ee ’ s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 1 , 201 9

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 1 4 th day of February

, 20 1 9.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22647]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 18, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 357 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-705, CP2024-714.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22647 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 35.1





SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT





HARLEY-DAVIDSON CREDIT CORP.





I, James Darrell Thomas, Vice President, Treasurer and Assistant Secretary of Harley-Davidson Credit Corp. (“HDCC”), certify that:





(i) a review of HDCC’s activities for the period from January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”) and of HDCC’s performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2012 (the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) among Harley-Davidson Motorcycle Trust 2012-1, Harley-Davidson Customer Funding Corp., HDCC, and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., has been made under my supervision; and





(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, HDCC has fulfilled in all material respects all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement throughout the Reporting Period.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate in the name of and behalf of HDCC this 25th day of March, 2015.








By:/s/ James Darrell ThomasJames Darrell ThomasVice President, Treasurer and Assistant SecretaryHarley-Davidson Credit Corp.
#### BURKS v. STATE.

No. 14102.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 25, 1931.

Martin, Shipman & Winters, of Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

The offense is theft of cotton; the punishment, a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for 30 days.

N. O. Holland lost 200 pounds of cotton from his wagon, which was in his field. An investigation disclosed cotton on the ground around the wagon and the tracks of two men. The loss occurred September 21, 1929. On the same date appellant sold 190 pounds of seed cotton to the Farmers’ Grin in Abilene, receiving a check payable to himself in the sum of $8.07. Albert Magill, an accomplice witness, testified that he and appellant went to Mr. Holland’s field in his (Magill’s) car at night and took about 190 pounds of cotton from the wagon. He testified further that they sold the cotton to the Farmers’ Gin in Abilene; that appellant received a check therefor, which was later cashed and the proceeds divided between' the parties. The purchaser of the cotton did not attempt to testify that appellant and the accomplice came to his gin and sold him cotton. He merely testified that the cheek presented to him represented the amount paid by him for 190 pounds of cotton on the date disclosed by the check. There were some automobile tracks in the vicinity of the cotton wagon, but the officers were unable to follow the tracks. They testified that one of the tracks was made by a badly worn casing. The state made no effort to show that the car driven by the accomplice on the occasion of the theft would make tracks similar to those found in the vicinity of the cotton wagon. No witness testified to having seen appellant and the accomplice together near Holland’s premises; nor did any witness testify that he saw the parties together at the gin when the cotton was sold. There was nothing to show what kind of cotton Holland lost. Appellant described the cotton he sold to the gin as “Boleys.” He said: “ ‘Boleys’ are a poor grade of cotton.” Appellant denied that he had engaged in stealing cotton with the accomplice witness, and testified that the cotton he sold the gin belonged to him. He said that he had raised it on his place. He denied going to the Farmers’ Gin with the accomplice witness.

 It is the contention that the accomplice witness was not sufficiently corroborated. The state’s attorney before this court expresses the opinion that the evidence is insufficient. The opinion is expressed that the contention must be sustained. The corroboration merely shows the commission of the offense. A conviction cannot be had upon the testimony of an accomplice, unless corrobo*160rated by other evidence tending to connect the accused with the offense committed. The corroboration is not sufficient if it merely shows the commission of the offense. Article 718, O. O. P.; Timmons v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 29 S.W.(2d) 770.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 322 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 256
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 322

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2015

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            October 8, 2015

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. 
                    Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. ZACHARY M. FISHER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 256

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 322

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. 
                    Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 8, 2015

                       Reported without amendment
```
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

TEXAS TAX SOLUTIONS, LLC.,

 

 Appellant,

v.

CITY OF EL PASO

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-18-00126-CV

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 5

of El Paso County, Texas 

(TC# 2014DTX0412)

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the Appellee’s third motion for extension of time within which to file 

the brief until March 1, 2019. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO 

FILE THE APPELLEE’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jose Padilla, the Appellee’s attorney, prepare the 

Appellee’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before March 1, 2019.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 14

th day of February, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez and Palafox, JJ.
#### WATSON v. STATE.

No. 17957.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 19, 1936.

M. E. Lawrence, of Eastland, .for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary foi 'two years.

The appeal bond found in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of *360the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the judge who tried the case. The statute, article 818, C.C.P., requires that the bond be approved by both the judge and the sheriff. See Wood v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 83 S.W.(2d) 670, and cases cited.

Appellant is granted fifteen days from this date within which to perfect his appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.
EXHIBIT
35.1







World Omni Financial Corp.

Servicer Compliance Statement

Pursuant to Item 1123

of Regulation AB







I, Victor A. De Jesús,
do hereby certify that I am the Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of World Omni Financial Corp., a Florida corporation,
and further certify on behalf of World Omni Financial Corp. in its capacity as servicer (the “Servicer”) under the
Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 18, 2012 (the “Agreement”), among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust
2012-A, as Issuing Entity, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Depositor, and the Servicer, as follows:



(i)	A review of
the activities of the Servicer during the period covered by the issuing entity’s Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Reporting Period”), and of its performance under the Agreement, has been made under
my supervision.



(ii)	To the best
of my knowledge, based on the review described above, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in
all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto
set my hand as of March 13, 2015.





| | WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.
| | --------------------------
| |                           
| |                           
| | By:                       
| |                           
| |                           
| |                           
| |
abmd-ex101_379.htm



 

Exhibit 10.1



 

 

 

September 12, 2017

 

 

(By Electronic Mail and Federal Express)

Leo C. Thibeault, Jr.

513 Turtle Hatch Lane,

Naples, FL 34103
Email: chuckthibeault@comcast.net

 


	
Re:
	
Notice of Exercise of Option to Buy




 

Dear Chuck:

 

Reference is made to that certain Lease, dated as of August 12, 2016 (the “Lease”), by and between the Thibeault Nominee Trust, as lessor (“Lessor”), and Abiomed, Inc., as lessee (“Lessee”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Lease.

 

Pursuant to Section 35 of the Lease, Lessee hereby exercises its Option to Buy.  The closing date of the sale of the Premises from Lessor to Lessee shall occur on October 30, 2017, unless otherwise extended pursuant to Section 35 of the Lease or agreement between Lessor and Lessee.  Per Section 35(a) of the Lease, the purchase price shall be $16,500,000.00.  This letter is delivered by Lessee to Lessor in satisfaction of the written notice required by Section 35 of the Lease.

 

 

[Signature Page Follows]

 








 

Very truly yours,

 

ABIOMED, INC.,
a Delaware corporation

 

 

By: /s/ Michael R. Minogue

Name:  Michael R. Minogue 

Title:  Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

CC:Marc Frey, Esq.

Jack Creedon, Esq. (e-mail only)

Matthew Tosto, Esq. (e-mail only)

 

 

RECEIPT ACKNOWLEDGED:

 

Thibeault Nominee Trust

 

By:/s/ Leo C. Thibeault, Jr.

Name: Leo C. Thibeault, Jr.

Title: Trustee

Date: 9/13/2017
EXHIBIT NO. 31.1CERTIFICATIONI, Gregg Zahn, Chief Executive Officer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of First Trinity Financial Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisquarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer’s and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: November 12, 2007         By:                                       /s/ Gregg Zahn    Gregg Zahn, President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 10.17

 

AMENDMENT TO THE

EMPLOYEE SHARE PURCHASE RIGHTS AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment to the Employee Share Purchase Rights Agreement (the “Amendment”) has been entered into on the   th of May 2016 by and between:

 

(1)                                Pangaea Foods SPC for the account of Pangaea Foods (China) SP and BK AsiaPac Pte. Ltd. (BKAP) (collectively the “Shareholders”); and

 

(2)                                            , having residential address at                   and with PRC ID Card number                 (the “Employee”)

 

(each individually a “Party” and collectively the “Parties”).

 

WHEREAS:

 

(A)                              The Parties entered into an “Employee Share Purchase Rights Agreement” on the 1st of December 2015 (the “Agreement”).

(B)                              The Parties wish to amend the date from which the Agreement shall be deemed effective.

(C)                              Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Agreement.

 

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

 

1.                            The Parties hereby agree to amend Article 3 so that the share purchase right regarding the first 25% tranche shall be deemed to have been granted as of the 2nd of January 2016. For the avoidance of doubt, the exercise date of the remaining tranches shall be unaffected from such amendment.

 

2.                            All other terms and provisions of the Agreement shall remain the same.

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized representatives on the date first set forth above.

 

 

Pangaea Foods, SPC for the account of Pangaea Foods (China) SP

BK AsiaPac Pte. Ltd. (BKAP)

 

 

	
By:
    	
 
    	
 
    	
By:
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
 
    	
Name:
    
	
Title:
    	
 
    	
Title:
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Employee:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Name:
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
Title:
usbank

All of us serving you

**AnnualStatement of Compliance UBS-BarclaysCommercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C2**

Re: 

ThePooling and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of July 1,2012 among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as depositor, Wells FargoBank, National Association, as master servicer, CWCapital Asset Management LLC, asspecial servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as operating advisor, and U.S. BankNational Association, as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian 

           I,Nancie J. Arvin, a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Certificate Administratorhereby certify that:            (1) A review of the activities of theCertificate Administrator duringthe year ended December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period") and of the performance of CertificateAdministrator under the Agreement has been made under my supervision; and            (2) To the best of my knowledge, basedon such review, the CertificateAdministrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughoutthe Reporting Period. 

Capitalized terms used but not defined herein havethe meanings setforth in the Agreement. 

Date: March 14, 2014 

 U.S.Bank National Association as Certificate Administrator By: /s/  Nancie J. ArvinNancie J. Arvin Senior Vice President