June 2011

2009 Federal Child Care 

Subsidy Program 

Call for Data Results
1

2009 Federal Child Care Subsidy Program

Call for Data Results

2009 REPORT

Table of Contents

Background........................................................................................................................... 2

Why Subsidize Child Care? .................................................................................................. 2

The FCCSP Call for Data...................................................................................................... 3

Trends Over Time................................................................................................................. 3

Key Results........................................................................................................................... 4

Analysis ................................................................................................................................5 

Conclusion............................................................................................................................6 

References ...........................................................................................................................7 

Appendix A: 2009 Data Results ...........................................................................................8 

Appendix B: Cost of Program Administration .....................................................................12 

Appendix C: Child Care Centers and Family Based Homes............................................... 14 

Appendix D: 10 Agencies with the Highest Funds Disbursed.............................................16 

Appendix E: Additional Data ..............................................................................................17 

Appendix F: OPM Form 1645 ............................................................................................21 
2

Results

Background 

 

The Federal Child Care Subsidy Program (FCCSP), established in 2001 by Public Law 107-67, 

Sec. 630, allows agencies to use appropriated and revolving funds to help lower income Federal 

employees pay for child care. Federal agencies choose whether or not they wish to participate, 

based on considerations such as budget, mission priorities, and the demographics and needs of 

their employee population. Agencies that establish a subsidy program are given broad latitude in 

determining key elements of their programs, including income ceiling and total amount 

disbursed as well as defining the parameters of this program at their agencies. Each 

implementing agency administers its program, often through a contract with a third-party 

administrator. 

The U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) provides guidance, support and resources to 

Federal agencies for the FCCSP. Resources include the Guide for Implementing Child Care 

Legislation 

(http://www.opm.gov/Employment_and_Benefits/WorkLife/OfficialDocuments/HandbooksGuid

es/Childcare_Legislation/index.asp), informational meetings with agency subsidy coordinators to 

share ideas and best practices, child care subsidy workshops, and one-on-one assistance to 

agencies contemplating implementation of a program.

Why Subsidize Child Care?

The costs of child care in the United States can be prohibitive, especially for lower-income 

families. Data from the National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Service 

Agencies (NACCRRA) show that demand for child care services is very high, with over 14

million children under the age of 6 in child care each week.1 

The quality of care matters and has implications for children’s behavioral and academic 

development. Findings from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

longitudinal study found that children from higher-quality early child care have stronger 

vocabularies than their counterparts from lower-quality child care. The study authors also noted 

that those from higher-quality child care were less likely to report engaging in problematic 

behaviors such as arguing and fighting.2

 

1 National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Service Agencies. Child Care in America: 2009 State Fact 

Sheet. (http://www.naccrra.org/docs/policy/state-fact-sheet-2009.pdf) 4. 

 Quality is also a concern for employers, since higher 

quality care settings can help parents worry less and be more engaged at work. Center-based and 

other licensed care tends to be the most expensive but also the most reliable, reducing the 

amount of leave parents might have to take to cope with child care gaps. However, quality has a 

2 Belsky, J., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., McCartney, K., Owen, M. T., & NICHD Early Child Care 

Research Network. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early child care? Child Development, 78(2), 681-701.
3

high price tag. Licensed day care centers can cost almost $12,000/year for 4-year olds and 

almost $16,000/year for infants.3

The FCCSP can reduce these costs so that lower income employees gain access to quality child 

care which helps Federal agencies recruit and retain the staff they need to accomplish their 

mission. 

The FCCSP Call for Data

As required by regulation, OPM issues an annual call for child care subsidy data (the Call) to all 

participating agencies or agency components at the beginning of each calendar year. 

Agencies/components use the OPM Form 1645 (Appendix G) to make an electronic submission. 

The data are compiled and an information copy of the results is sent to Congress. 

Annual data exist from the inception of the program through the current reporting year with basic 

information about agency/component disbursements, employees and children served, and some 

programmatic details. OPM uses the information gathered to better serve those who currently 

participate in the FCCSP and to encourage more participation government-wide. In response to 

requests from staff of those agencies or components who participates or who are contemplating 

implementation of a FCCSP, OPM will make these results available on the OPM website 

(www.opm.gov/Employment_and_Benefits/WorkLife/OfficialDocuments/Reports_to_Congress) 

in the form of this results document. 

Trends Over Time

Thirty-three Federal agencies/components now offer a child care subsidy (Appendix A). Many 

of those who participate implemented their program in 2001 with the exception of the newest, 

National Science Foundation, which implemented the program in 2009. The total dollars 

disbursed through the programs has ranged from five to six million dollars over the past several 

years (Figure 1), with a 2009 average per child spending of $1301.4

 

 

3 National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Service Agencies. Child Care in America: 2009 State Fact 

Sheet. (http://www.naccrra.org/docs/policy/state-fact-sheet-2009.pdf) 7. 

4 Average per child spending is derived by dividing the total disbursed in 2009 (Figure 1) by the total number of children enrolled 

in 2009.
4

Figure 1

 $5,062,920 

$5,904,560 

 $5,597,885 $5,621,532 

$5,227,486 

$5,599,942 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Millions

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009

Total Funds Disbursed 2004-2009

Key Results

The 2009 Call reveals the following highlights:

• The total amount disbursed by those participating agencies/components in fiscal year 

2009 was $5,559,942. This represents an increase ($372,000) over the 2008 total. 

• There was an increase in the number of employees (2,812 in 2008 to 3,240 in 2009) and 

children (3,799 in 2008 to 4,303 in 2009) enrolled in the program. 

• Eight agencies/components increased their income ceiling level for 2009 by an average of 

$5,600.5

o Department of State

o Department of Interior

o General Services Administration

o National Labor Relations Board

o Nuclear Regulatory Commission

o Securities and Exchange Commission

o Department of Treasury, Bureau of Public Debt 

o Department of Treasury, IRS Office of Chief Counsel 

 

5 Number is derived by taking the total increase of the eight agencies and getting an average. The average is then rounded to the 

nearest dollar.
5

• Most agencies/components are paying less than 50% of the total costs for childcare for 

those enrolled in their program. 

Analysis

Thirty-three (33) agencies or agency components have child care subsidy programs. This 

number is comprised of a total of the Department level agencies and individual agency 

components.6

 The fiscal year data finds 29 out of 33 of those who participate responded to the 

Call. The following did not respond: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and Department 

of Agriculture (Farm Service Agency, Foreign Agricultural Service, Research Education and 

Economics). 

In 2009, there was an increase in the amount disbursed by participating agencies/components as 

compared to 2008 (Figure 1). Of those who responded to the Call, eight had an increase in their 

funds disbursed over the previous year (Appendix A). The component with the highest percent 

increase is the Department of Transportation’s Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). FAA 

experienced a 408% increase in their FCCSP funds disbursed. The number of FAA employees 

and children of employees participating in this program increased from 168 employees and 236 

children to 238 and 322, respectively. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) also saw an 

increase of 125% in its funds disbursed for 2009. 

Most of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) component agencies also saw 

relatively high increases for fiscal year 2009. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 

disbursed $162,933 in 2009 resulting in a 49% increase over 2008 amount of $109,098. Another 

component agency of HHS, Food and Drug Administration, saw a 43% increase over 2008 due 

to an increase in the number of children enrolled, while the National Institutes of Health and the 

Program Support Center saw a 26% and 33% increase respectively. 

Despite increases in disbursement by several of those who participate, some saw a decrease in 

funds disbursed for 2009. The Administration on Aging, HHS, went from disbursing $21,852.00 

in 2008 to $11,283.00 in 2009, representing a 48% decrease in disbursement. This decrease 

stems from a decline in their enrollment. The Department of Education saw an 81% decrease in 

their disbursement also due to declining enrollment.

The income ceiling level may be a reason that a few agency/component disbursement totals were 

lower than in previous years. Of those who participate, eight increased their income ceiling for 

2009. Only three of the eight agencies/components showed a slight increase in their 2009 

FCCSP participation rate, while the remainder of the eight saw decreases or remained the same 

in participation rate. This indicates that though these agencies/components increased their 

income ceiling, the increase still did not have a major impact on enrollment, another indicator 

that the ceiling may still be a barrier to participation. A majority of agencies/components 

implemented the FCCSP several years ago and have not changed their guidelines or criteria for 

 

6 There are 21 total Department level agencies offering a subsidy program, however, agencies with components are counted 

individually, (as their program may differ from component to component) which gives us a total of 33. The Department of 

Health and Human Services, for example, has 6 component agencies that offer the subsidy.
6

participation. Salaries increase annually causing eligible participants to become ineligible. OPM 

recommends the evaluation of programs at least once a year. 

Another finding of interest from the Call was the percentage of paid child care costs. Appendix 

F illustrates these numbers vary considerably by agency/component. The Department of 

Treasury, IRS Office of Chief Counsel is the component with the highest percentage paid, 89%. 

A majority of those who responded to the Data Call are paying less than 50% of the child care 

costs.

An additional result to highlight from the Call is the number of children enrolled in child care 

centers and family child care homes. Agencies/Components who responded indicated there are 

3,491 children in child care centers and 717 children in family child care homes. This number is 

an increase over 2008 numbers (3,197 in child care centers and 592 in child care homes). 

Another point of interest is the varying degree in administrative costs. Some 

agencies/components reported no costs to administer the program, while others have costs as 

high as $272,000. Some agencies/components administer their program using in-house Federal 

staff which negates the need for additional program costs, while others use independent 

contractors. 

Conclusion

The FCCSP is one of the most vital work/life programs in the Federal government and is a useful 

program which agencies can utilize to recruit and retain employees. In addition, it is considered 

valuable in helping with employee cost of child care. Increases in the enrollment rates for the 

program highlights that employees find it useful and beneficial in helping to save on the cost of 

child care. The key findings are especially encouraging in that it shows agencies/components 

are, in all possible cases, pushing for valuable increases in income ceiling. Given the nature of 

the funding for the FCCSP, this certainly poses as a challenge as many have budget constraints. 

 

OPM, as the lead agency providing guidance and support to agencies on all aspects of this 

program, continues to promote implementation and utilization of the FCCSP at work/life 

coordinator meetings, specialized workshops, agency visits and conferences/seminars, while 

agencies monitor and maintain their program and annually report the progress to OPM through 

the Call (Appendix A and Appendix G). Efforts to continue to provide support to agencies will 

strengthen as we encourage agencies without a FCCSP to consider implementation. Information 

about the FCCSP can be found on www.opm.gov/work.life. 
7

References 

National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Service Agencies. Child Care in 

America: 2009 State Fact Sheet. (http://www.naccrra.org/docs/policy/state-fact-sheet2009.pdf) 4, 7. 

Belsky, J., Vandell, D. L., Burchinal, M., Clarke-Stewart, K. A., McCartney, K., Owen, M. T., & 

NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2007). Are there long-term effects of early 

child care? Child Development, 78(2), 681-701. 
8

Appendix A

2009 Data Results 

Comparison of 2008 and 2009 Data (Agency/Component Name, Income Ceiling, 

2008 Funds, 2009 Funds, Number of Employees, Number of Children, % Increased or 

Decreased by)

Agency/ 

Component

Name

2008 

Income 

Ceiling

2009 

Income 

Ceiling

2008 

Funds 

Paid

2009 

Funds 

Paid

2008 # of 

Employees

2009 # of 

Employees

2008 # of 

Children

2009 # of 

Children

%

Change 

in Funds 

Paid

Central 

Intelligence 

Agency

$70,000 $70,000 $226,020 $206,777 59 60 78 75 (9%) 

Department of 

Education $50,000 $50,000 $36,060 $6,750 8 3 8 3 (81%) 

Department of 

Housing and 

Urban 

Development

$70,000 $69,999 $210,124 $207,714 90 83 122 109 (1%) 

Department of 

Labor $59,999 $59,999 $179,747 $175,375 116 145 147 175 2% 

Department of 

State $68,000 $75,000 $165,996 $170,003 77 68 105 91 2% 

Department of 

the Interior $43,000 $60,000 $4,888 $5,923 2 3 3 3 21% 
9

Agency/ 

Component

Name

2008 

Income 

Ceiling

2009 

Income 

Ceiling

2008 

Funds 

Paid

2009 

Funds 

Paid

2008 # of 

Employees

2009 # of 

Employees

2008 # of 

Children

2009 # of 

Children

% 

Change 

in Funds 

Paid

DOT - Federal 

Aviation 

Administration 

$72,000 $72,000 $123,366 $627,152 168 238 236 322 408% 

DOT - Federal 

Railroad 

Administration

$75,000 $75,000 $2,203 $2,203 4 3 4 3 0% 

Environmental 

Protection 

Agency

N/A $75,000 N/A $194,014 N/A 75 N/A 97 N/A

Federal Energy 

Regulatory 

Commission

$56,297 Did not 

report $2,628 Did not report 

1 Did not 

report 

1 Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

General 

Services 

Administration

$61,500 $63,300 $277,501 $259,574 77 68 98 71 (6%) 

HHS -

Administration 

on Aging

$50,000 $50,000 $21,852 $11,283 18 11 26 17 (48%) 

HHS - Centers 

for Disease 

Control

$65,000 $65,000 $109,098 $162,933 70 85 94 114 49% 

HHS - Food & 

Drug 

Administration

$75,000 $75,000 $107,563 $153,688 60 59 88 97 43% 
10

Agency/ 

Component 

Name

2008 

Income 

Ceiling

2009 

Income 

Ceiling

2008 

Funds 

Paid

2009 

Funds 

Paid

2008 # of 

Employees

2009 # of 

Employees

2008 # of 

Children

2009 # of 

Children

% 

Change 

in Funds 

Paid

HHS - Heath 

Resources and 

Services 

Administration

$40,000 $40,000 $4,720 $0 4 0 6 0 (100%) 

HHS -

National 

Institutes of 

Health

$60,000 $60,000 $241,559 $304,805 120 144 154 189 26% 

HHS -

Program 

Support Center

$75,000 $75,000 $85,059 $112,726 28 27 45 47 33% 

HHS -

Substance 

Abuse and 

Mental Health 

Services 

Administration

$50,000 $50,000 $4,500 $3,826 2 1 2 1 (15%) 

HUD - Office 

of Inspector 

General

$69,999 $69,999 $9,204 $6,243 3 2 4. 2 (32%) 

National Labor 

Relations 

Board

$48,928 $50,346 $13,510 $12,245 5 5 6 6 (9%) 

National 

Science 

Foundation

N/A $75,000 N/A $24,306 N/A 13 N/A 14 N/A

Nuclear 

Regulatory 

Commission

$55,000 $68,000 $10,046 $22,560 6 13 10 20 125% 

Office of 

Personnel 

Management

$60,000 $60,000 $120,594 $109,581 38 34 51 48 (9%) 
11

Agency/ 

Component 

Name

2008 

Income 

Ceiling

2009 

Income 

Ceiling

2008 

Funds 

Paid

2009 

Funds 

Paid

2008 # of 

Employees

2009 # of 

Employees

2008 # of 

Children

2009 # of 

Children

% 

Change 

in Funds 

Paid

Pension 

Benefit 

Guaranty 

Corporation

$67,775 $67,775 $57,923 $54,071 17 18 17 19 (7%) 

Railroad 

Retirement 

Board

$60,000 $60,000 $5,180 $0 2 0 2 0 (100%) 

Securities and 

Exchange 

Commission

$60,000 $61,740 $27,846 $31,948 16 13 21 15 15% 

Treasury - US 

BPD $70,000 $75,000 $53,362 $33,558 27 25 46 38 (37%) 

Treasury - US 

Mint $60,000 $60,000 $1,102 $0 1 0 1 0 (100%) 

Treasury-IRSOffice of Chief 

Counsel

$49,500 $51,500 $21,877 $17,706 7 8 7 8 (19%) 

USDA - Farm 

Service 

Agency

N/A Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

USDA -

Foreign 

Agricultural 

Service

N/A Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report 

USDA -

Research, 

Education & 

Economics

$60,000 Did not 

report $171,134 Did not report 86 Did not report 120 Did not report 

Did not 

report 

Veterans 

Affairs $60,000 $60,000 $2,932,824 $2,682,978 1700 2036 2289 2719 (9%) 

Total $5,227,486 $5,599,942 2,812 3,240 3,799 4,303 91%
12

Appendix B 

Cost of Program Administration

This table shows the cost for each agency/component to administer the child care subsidy 

program.

Agency/Component Name Program Administration Cost of 

Administration

Central Intelligence Agency Federal Employee Education 

and Assistance (FEEA) $17,535 

Department of Education Department of Education $6,750

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development First Financial Associates, Inc. $17,617 

Department of Labor First Financial Associates, Inc. $28,200

Department of State FEEA $14,600

Department of the Interior GSA $1,000

DOT - Federal Aviation Administration DOT-FAA $45,045

DOT - Federal Railroad Administration FEEA $1,176

Environmental Protection Agency FEEA $194,014

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 

(FERC) FERC Did Not Report 

General Services Administration GSA $20,177

HHS - Administration on Aging First Financial Associates, Inc. $0

HHS - Centers for Disease Control FEEA $14,035

HHS - Food & Drug Administration First Financial Associates, Inc. $0.00

HHS - Heath Resources and Services 

Admin FEEA $0 

HHS - National Institutes of Health FEEA $25,384

HHS - Program Support Center First Financial Associates, Inc. $0

HHS - Substance Abuse and Mental 

Health Services Administration First Financial Associates, Inc. $0 

HUD - Office of Inspector General First Financial Associates, Inc. $806

National Labor Relations Board First Financial Associates, Inc. $1,500
13

Agency/Component Name Program Administration Cost of 

Administration

National Science Foundation FEEA $4,944

Nuclear Regulatory Commission FEEA $2,762

Office of Personnel Management FEEA $9,766

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation FEEA $5,326

Railroad Retirement Board FEEA $0

Securities and Exchange Commission FEEA $3,556

Treasury - US BPD Treasury –US BPD $0

Treasury - US Mint US Mint $0

Treasury-IRS-Office of Chief Counsel FEEA $2,416

USDA - Farm Service Agency NA Did Not Report

USDA - Foreign Agricultural Service NA Did Not Report

USDA - Research, Education & 

Economics NA Did Not Report 

Veterans Affairs Veteran Affairs $292,500
14

Appendix C 

Number of participants that utilized a child care center versus a family home.

Agency/Component Name Child Care 

Center

Family 

Home

Central Intelligence Agency 62 13

Department of Education 3 0

Department of Housing and Urban Development 94 15

Department of Labor 128 47

Department of State 77 14

Department of the Interior 3 0

DOT - Federal Aviation Administration 278 44

DOT - Federal Railroad Administration 3 0

Environmental Protection Agency 0 0

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Did Not Report Did Not 

Report 

General Services Administration 12 59

HHS - Administration on Aging 14 3

HHS - Centers for Disease Control 108 6

HHS - Food & Drug Administration 77 20

HHS - Heath Resources and Services Admin 0 0

HHS - National Institutes of Health 136 53

HHS - Program Support Center 38 11

HHS - Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services 

Administration 0 1 

HUD - Office of Inspector General 2 0

National Labor Relations Board 6 0

National Science Foundation 12 2

Nuclear Regulatory Commission 18 2

Office of Personnel Management 38 10

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation 15 4
15

Agency/Component Name Child Care 

Center

Family 

Home

Railroad Retirement Board 0 0

Securities and Exchange Commission 13 2

Treasury - US BPD 35 3

Treasury - US Mint 0 0

Treasury-IRS-Office of Chief Counsel 8 0

USDA - Farm Service Agency Did Not Report Did Not 

Report

USDA - Foreign Agricultural Service Did Not Report Did Not 

Report

USDA - Research, Education & Economics Did Not Report Did Not 

Report

Veterans Affairs 2,311 408

Total: 3491 717
16

Appendix D 

Top 10 Agencies/Components with the Highest Funds Disbursed

Agency/Component Name Highest Amount

Veterans Affairs $2,682,978

DOT - Federal Aviation Administration $627,152

HHS - National Institutes of Health $304,805

General Services Administration $259,574

Department of Housing and Urban Development $207,714

Central Intelligence Agency $206,777

Environmental Protection Agency $194,014

Department of Labor $175,375

Department of State $170,003

HHS - Centers for Disease Control $162,933
17

Appendix E 

Additional Data

Note: Numbers are rounded to the nearest dollar amount.

Agency/ 

Component

Name

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Employee

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Child

Highest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement

Lowest 

Monthly 

Employee

Disbursement

Central 

Intelligence 

Agency

$3,446 $2,757 $441 $270 

Department of 

Education $2250 $2250 $380 $300 

Department of 

Housing and 

Urban 

Development

$2,503 $1,906 $540 $25 

Department of 

Labor $1,209 $1,002 $500 $10 

Department of 

State $2,500 $1,868 $588 $22 

Department of 

the Interior $1,974 $1,974 $642 $0 

DOT - Federal 

Aviation 

Administration

$2,635 $1,948 $3,503 $43 

DOT - Federal 

Railroad 

Administration

$734 $734 $349 $50 

Environmental 

Protection 

Agency

$2,587 $2,000 $0 $14 

Federal 

Energy 

Regulatory 

Commission

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report Did not report Did not report 
18

Agency/ 

Component 

Name

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Employee

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Child

Highest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement

Lowest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement

General 

Services 

Administration

$3,817 $3,656 $1,522 $29 

HHS -

Administration 

on Aging

$1,026 $664 $189 $37 

HHS - Centers 

for Disease 

Control

$1,917 $1,429 $488 $8 

HHS - Food & 

Drug 

Administration

$2,608 $1,584 $890 $4 

HHS - Heath 

Resources and 

Services 

Admin

$0 $0 $0 $0 

HHS -

National 

Institutes of 

Health

$2,117 $1,613 $612 $22 

HHS -

Program 

Support 

Center

$4,175 $2,398 $1,175 $43 

HHS -

Substance 

Abuse and 

Mental Health 

Services 

Administration

$3,826 $3,826 $375 $120 

HUD - Office 

of Inspector 

General

$3,122 $3,122 $740 $240 
19

Agency/ 

Component

Name

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Employee

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Child

Highest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement

Lowest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement

National 

Labor 

Relations 

Board

$2,449 $2,041 $3,060 $2,020 

National 

Science 

Foundation

$1,870 $1,736 $575 $38 

Nuclear 

Regulatory 

Commission

$1,735 $1,128 $463 $87 

Office of 

Personnel 

Management

$3,223 $2,282.94 $689 $13 

Pension 

Benefit 

Guaranty 

Corporation 

$3,004 $2,846 $400 $83 

Railroad 

Retirement 

Board

$0 $0 $0 $0 

Securities 

and 

Exchange 

Commission

$2,458 $2,130 $693 $38 

Treasury -

US BPD $1,342 $883 $605 $44 

Treasury -

US Mint $0 $0 $0 $0 

TreasuryIRS-Office 

of Chief 

Counsel

$2,213 $2,213 $410 $43 
20

Agency/ 

Component

Name

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Employee

AVG 

Yearly 

Amount 

Per 

Child

Highest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement

Lowest 

Monthly 

Employee 

Disbursement

USDA -

Farm 

Service 

Agency

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report Did not report Did not report 

USDA -

Foreign 

Agricultural 

Service

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report Did not report Did not report 

USDA -

Research, 

Education & 

Economics

Did not 

report 

Did not 

report Did not report Did not report 

Veterans

Affairs $1,318 $987 $2,683 $3 
21

Appendix F 

2009 Call for Child Care Subsidy Data 

OPM Form 1645 

1. Agency Name

Agency Street Address

2. Has your agency stopped offering a child care subsidy program since the last time you 

reported the data?

□ Yes □ No

Please explain

3a. Income ceiling of the child care subsidy program in your agency $ 0

3b. In the past fiscal year, has the income ceiling level changed? 

□ Increase □ Decrease □ No Change

Results

4a. Total agency population 0

4b. Number of employees utilizing the child care subsidy program 0

4c. The average total family income of employees in the child care 

subsidy program $ 0

4d. Total amount of funds disbursed this past fiscal year $ 0

Agency City Agency State Agency Zip Code

Note: This data form is for informational purposes
22

4e. Total of all employees' child care costs (pre-subsidy). $ 0

4f. Number of children served by the child care subsidy program. 0

4g. Lowest monthly employee disbursement $ 0

4h. Highest monthly employee disbursement $ 0

Types of Child Care Provider

5. Total number

Number of children in center based child care 0

Number of children in family child care homes 0

Program Administration 

6a. Did your agency administer the program? 

□ Yes □ No

6b. Did your agency contract with another organization to administer the funds? 

□ Yes □

□ No

6c. Total cost to administer the program during the past fiscal year $ 0

7. If there have been any substantial changes in your child care subsidy program or if you have 

any additional comments, please provide below:
23

Agency Certification

8a. Name

8b. Title 

8c. Telephone number 

8e. Email

8f. Date 
United States

Office of Personnel Management

Employee Services

1900 E Street, NW

Washington, DC 20415

ES/AVS/WLW-01