alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States 

 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 00-216 Date: August 25, 2000 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB): Clarification of Guidance on 

Temporary Continuation of Coverage (TCC) 

_____________________________________________________________ 

This is to clarify our guidance about the TCC eligibility of children who lose FEHB coverage 

because they do not qualify for a survivor annuity upon the death of an employee or annuitant. 

We recently reviewed a case in which an annuitant with a self and family FEHB enrollment died, 

leaving no surviving spouse and one child who was 21 years old. This child was not eligible for 

a survivor annuity because he was over 18 and not a full-time student. Therefore, he was unable 

to continue his deceased father’s FEHB enrollment as a survivor annuitant and the enrollment 

terminated. While reviewing this child’s eligibility for TCC, we concluded that our guidance in 

the FEHB Handbook reflects too narrow of an interpretation of FEHB law. 

Applicable law (5 USC 8905a(b)) provides that a child who loses coverage because he or she no 

longer meets the requirements for being considered an unmarried dependent child is eligible for 

TCC. The law further defines “dependent” (5 USC 8901(9)) to mean that the employee or 

annuitant is living with or contributing to the support of the child. 

In the case described above, the child is eligible for TCC because the annuitant died and the child 

does not qualify for a survivor annuity as a dependent of the deceased. Similarly, a child 

receiving a survivor annuity as a dependent of the deceased would cease to be dependent if the 

survivor annuity stops for any reason, including because he or she is no longer a full-time 

student. This child would also be eligible for TCC. 

Our previous guidance states that a child who does not qualify for a survivor annuity would not 

be eligible for TCC. We issued it over 10 years ago (FPM Letter 890-30, December 27, 1989) 

and based it upon a narrow interpretation of the law. We have now concluded that a broader 

interpretation is possible and fully consistent with the purposes of the TCC provisions. We are 

updating the information in the Termination, Conversion, and Temporary Continuation of 

Coverage chapter of the FEHB Handbook to reflect this. 
2

Unfortunately, current law offers no basis for extending TCC eligibility to spouses who do not 

qualify for a survivor annuity. We are requesting amendatory legislation to correct this situation. 

If you need assistance in understanding this change, please call our information staff on (202) 

606-0191. You may also send Email about this issue to Barbara Myers at bdmyers@opm.gov. 

 Abby L. Block, Chief 

 Insurance Policy 

 and Information Division
#### BALLEW v. STATE.

No. 18929.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1937.

Sam J. Hamilton, of Memphis, and Mahan & Broughton, of Childress, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at a fine of $100.

The count of the information under which the conviction was obtained is insufficient in failing to allege the steps by which the sale of liquor was prohibited, namely, that an election was held in the county and that the result thereof was such as to prohibit the act complained of. See Whitmire v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 94 S.W. (2d) 742; Kelly v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 998; Privitt v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W. (2d) 204; Hardin v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 101 S.W. (2d) 264.

For the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
Exhibit 10.11


 


Form of Sales Agreement


 


	Customer: China National Forest Products Corp.	Contract No.:
	 	 
	Supplier: Zhejiang FLS Mushroom Co., Ltd	Signed at:


 


Contract Date:


 


1. Product, unit, quantity, price per unit,
and total amount


 


	No.	 	Product Name	 	Unit (Ton)	 	Quantity	 	Price Per Unit
    

    (RMB)	 	Total Amount (RMB)	 	Note
	1	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	2	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	Total amount (RMB) (including tax):	 	 


 


2. Payment method and term: Customer shall
make the payment by bank’s acceptance bill or wire transfer.


 


3. Quality requirements: to meet the national
requirements for related agricultural products.


 


4. Place and method of delivery: the warehouse
in No. 888 Tianning Street, Lishui, Zhejiang. Customer is responsible for picking up.


 


5. Transportation and expenses: Customer picks
up the goods and bears the transportation costs.


 


6. Package standard and requirements: the packages
should be qualified for multiple loads and unloads and to endure long-distance transportation. Package standard is to ensure the
goods will reach destination safely and in undamaged condition with normal multiple loads and unloads.


 


7. Inspection standards and methods: to meet
the quality standard as required by Customer. If Customer does not express any disagreement on the quality upon receiving the goods,
it will be considered as qualified.


 


8. Financial responsibility: as required by
law, the governing law of this agreement is the law of signing place. This agreement will take effect as of the date of signing
and is binding to both parties. None of the parties could make changes to or terminate this agreement unilaterally within the execution
period of this agreement.


 


9. Others: if any other issues occur, supplemental
agreements can be added after negotiation between both parties. Supplemental agreement is equally effective as this agreement.


 




     


     


    

 


10. Effectiveness and changes:
this agreement will take effect once the seals of both parties are affixed. Any changes can be made with written consent of both
parties.


 


For corporate chop:


 


	Customer	 	Supplier
	Name: China National Forest Products Corp.  	 	Name:  Zhejiang FLS Mushroom Co., Ltd  
	Address: No. 20 Anyuan Rd, Chaoyang District, Beijing, China	 	Address: No. 888 Tianning Street, Lishui, China
	Legal Representative: Zhan Lin	 	Legal Representative: Yefang Zhang
	Bank:	 	Bank:
	Account No.:	 	Account No.:
	Tax No.	 	Tax No.
	Postcode:	 	Postcode:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 21
- 0197 IN THE MATTER OF: S.T.S., Respondent and Appellant. **ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including September 6, 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 30 2021

07/30/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0197
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80579-80580]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22856]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-3606-EM; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


South Carolina; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of an Emergency 
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of an emergency declaration for 
the State of South Carolina (FEMA-3606-EM), dated August 5, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 9, 2024.

[[Page 80580]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that the incident 
period for this emergency is closed effective August 22, 2024.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-22856 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 32


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, the
undersigned officer of Whoopass Poker Corporation
(formerly Whiffletree Acquisition Corporation  (the "Company"),
hereby certify to my knowledge that:

The Report on Form 10-K/A for the period from April 23, 2012
(Inception) to December 31, 2012, of the Company fully complies,
in all material respects, with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.


                             /s/ Donald Hohman
                                 Chief Executive Officer
                                 Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 19, 2013
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Shane Albers, Chief Executive Officer of Investors Mortgage Holdings, Inc., manager of IMHSecured Loan Fund, LLC, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2007of IMH Secured Loan Fund, LLC;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.        Date: November 14, 2007 /s/ Shane Albers   Shane Albers   Chief Executive Officer, Investors MortgageHoldings, Inc., manager of IMH Secured Loan Fund,LLC  
48
## NO. SCWC-30025 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I DEAN YOUNG, Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant

vs. DAN DUDDEN, Respondent/Defendant-Appellee

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CIV. CASE NO. 1RC08-1-9942) ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

(By: Acoba, J., for the court ) 1 

## The Application for Writ of Certiorari filed on June 23, 2011 by Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Dean Young is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, August 3, 2011. FOR THE COURT: /s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr. Associate Justice Dean Young, petitioner/ plaintiff-appellant pro se , on the application.

C o n s i d e r e d b y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , A c o b a , D u f f y , J J . , 1 a n d C i r c u i t J u d g e T o # o t o # o i n p l a c e o f M c K e n n a , J . , r e c u s e d . 

## Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30025 03-AUG-2011 03:24 PM
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 13-301 Date: February 2013

Subject: March 2013 Headcount 

This is a reminder for payroll providers to submit the semiannual Headcount for the March 2013 reporting 

period no later than March 20, 2013. 

The Headcount is reported semiannually (March and September) by all payroll providers that withhold 

monies from salaries for participants in the Civil Service Retirement System, Federal Employees 

Retirement System, Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, and/or the Federal Employees’ Group 

Life Insurance Program. 

The March 2013 Headcount for weekly and bi-weekly pay cycles will be for the payroll paid during the 

FIRST 15 DAYS of March. For monthly pay cycles, the reporting period will be February 1 through 

February 28, 2013. All Headcount reports must be submitted no later than March 20, 2013. We ask that 

you notify us if you anticipate a delay or any difficulties in submitting the report by that date. Under no 

circumstances, however, should you delay transmitting your normal Retirement and Insurance Transfer 

System (RITS) report because your Headcount is not ready to be submitted. 

Please FAX (using clear, legible originals) your OPM Forms 1523 and SF 2812-A to us at 202-606-0701. 

If you prefer, you may email your forms toYadira.Vega@opm.gov or Paul.Gvozdov@opm.gov. In 

addition, please mail the original forms to: U.S. Office of Personnel Management, Funds Management, 

P. O. Box 7125, Washington DC 20415. If you have any questions concerning the preparation of your 

Headcount report, please call Ms. Vega at 202-606-4842.

 

Emily Dean 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Financial Services
Exhibit 10.1


 


35 Wilbur Street Associates, LLC


19 Wilbur Street


Lynbrook, NY 11563







November 6, 2017







Mr. Thomas Wegman


Advance Biofactures Corp.


35 Wilbur Street


Lynbrook, NY 11563








	Re:	
Lease dated November 21, 2013 between 35 Wilbur Street Assoc., LLC and Advance Biofactures Corp., premises; 35 Wilbur Street, Lynbrook, NY 11563.












Dear Mr. Wegman:







It is our understanding that you would like to renew the lease. The current lease expires on November 30, 2017. We propose that the current terms of the lease remain in effect except where the following is concerned:


 



		1)	
The lease will be renewed for 1 (one) year at the rate of $133,975 annually. $11,164.58/month.








		
—

	
This will be less 14.89% of the utilities.







 


A current copy of the certificate of liability insurance is required.


 


Sincerely yours,


 


/s/ Valorie Mancuso


Valorie Mancuso


Controller







	 	 	
/s/ Valorie Mancuso


	 	 	
Valorie Mancuso/Controller


	
Thomas Wegman, President

	 	
Richard Arote Jr.


	
Advance Biofactures Corp.

	 	
35 Wilbur Street Assoc., LLC


	 	 	 
	/s/ Thomas Wegman	 	not present 11/06/2017.








	
State of New York

	
ss:


	
County of Nassau

	 








On this 06th day of November, 20l7, before me personally came, Thomas Wegman to me known, who, being by me duly sworn, did say that he is the President of Advance Biofactures Corp. and that he signed his name thereto by authority of the board of directors.
Record of Telephone & E-mail Communication

From: Wayne Ceynowa [mailto:wsc0008@auburn.edu] 

Sent: Monday, October 06, 2014 6:29 PM

To: Lundgren, Douglas (FAA)

Subject: RE: Auburn University Petition for Exemption 2014-0716

Hi Mr. Lundgren:

I did not provide a table to show the differences, but I have attached one in hopes that it will help.

Please let me know if you have any questions or require any additional information.

Thank you,

Wayne Ceynowa

Chief Flight Instructor

From: Douglas.Lundgren@faa.gov [mailto:Douglas.Lundgren@faa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, October 03, 2014 12:52 PM

To: Wayne Ceynowa

Subject: Auburn University Petition for Exemption 2014-0716

Dear Mr. Ceynowa:

I am one of several technical specialists who is reviewing Auburn’s Petition for Exemption 2014-0716, 

which deals with Part 61 flight graduates being 

able to take advantage of the provisions of 14CFR61.160 to obtain an Airline Transport Pilot Certificate 

with reduced aeronautical experience.

I have received a copy of Auburn’s Petition for Exemption (2 pages) and am wondering if there might 

have been any additional supporting information that I might have missed in the docket on 

Regulations.gov.

A similar petition for exemption dealing with Part 61 graduates was granted to Purdue University (FAA 

2013-0769). In that grant that exemption, it was mentioned that Purdue provided a table listing the 

differences (in some cases, none) between the Part 61 and Part 141 versions of their Safety Program, 

and for each flight course. The table provided specific flight hour adjustments that were made to each 

course during the period that it was operated under Part 61, in comparison to the normal Part 141 

requirements. I was wondering if Auburn has submitted anything similar to Purdue’s documentation.

Thank you for your cooperation and patience in this process.

Sincerely

Douglas J. Lundgren
Aviation Safety Inspector

Airman Certification and Training Branch AFS-810

Federal Aviation Administration HQ

800 Independence Avenue

Washington, DC 20591

Douglas.lundgren@faa.gov

Wash FSDO office: 703-230-7664 ext 274

AFS-810 office: 202-267-0150

Telework: 240-578-3180
#### In re DROMGOOLE’S ESTATE.

No. 10509.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

April 12, 1939.

Rehearing Denied May 10, 1939.

*978B. F. Patterson, of San Antonio, for appellants.

Chas. T. Haltom, of San Antonio, for appellee.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

The appeal is controlled by the question of whether the following instrument was sufficient to constitute the last will and testament of Orin Dromgoole, deceased :

> “April 18, 1934

> “My property at 1307 Hays St., car birds and etc. to be divided btween Willie (my brother), Hettie, Sister and Ocie. Store Dromgoole Bros, goes to Charlie, and he will always take care of John. Also the Witchell place of 80 acres. Twenty acres on Medina goes to Willie Dromgoole my Brother. Any other property that I might have or inherit I want devided equally with Ocie Hettie. Sister, Willie and Charlie.

> “Signed “Orin Dromgoole “Witness: “Mike Baez “Juan V. Zarzosa”

Probate of the instrument, as a will, was denied in the County Court, but allowed in the District Court. L. Drom-goole and others have appealed. The trial judge filed no findings of fact. As those findings are not efficiently questioned by appellants we must assume that the instrument was deliberately and properly executed with all the solemnity and formalities of a testament.

Appellants’ first proposition is that “An instrument in order to be a will should dispose of all the property the maker possesses and should indicate in some portion of the instrument that same is to take effect at or after the death of the maker.”

We are of the opinion the proposition is without merit. The law does not require that wills be written into any particular form or language. It' is sufficient if it shows the intention of the testator; that it is not operative, as a conveyance, during the life time of the maker, but only after his death; that it is revocable by him; that it operates to dispose of all his property at his death. 44 Tex.Jur. pp. 542, et seq., §§ 3⁄4 3.

The matter of the construction of the instrument is not involved in this proceeding. The language of the instrument under consideration may be inept, looses even confusing, but the trial judge found that it was sufficient, when taken in connection with the evidence, to operate as the last will and testament of the decedent, and we cannot say the judge abused his discretion in so finding and holding. 44 Tex. Jur. p. 549, § 8. Appellants’ remaining propositions, being supported by no statements from or reference to the record, present nothing for review.

The judgment is affirmed.