alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### JACKSON v. STATE.

No. 14583.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1932.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for assault to murder; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

There are no bills of exception in the record. The notice of appeal was entered on March 3, 1931. The statement of facts was-filed in the court below on June 20, 1931, This was more than the statutory ninety days-allowed by law. We are not at liberty to consider the statement of facts.

The indictment, the charge of the court, the judgment, and sentence appear to be in conformity with law, and, no error appearing,, the judgment will be affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**I, J. Michael Mayer, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Complete Production Services, Inc.(the “Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a -15(e)and 15d – 15(e)) for the Registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.            Date: May 4, 2007 By: /s/ J. Michael Mayer       J. Michael Mayer      Senior Vice President and      Chief Financial Officer
Date: October 29, 2014

Meeting: Teleconference – “Notice of Data Availability”

Rule(s) Discussed: Clean Power Plan Proposal -- Docket number EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0602

Attendee List: Attached. Presenters –Kevin Culligan and Reid Harvey

Written Materials? Yes/No – Summary attached

Summary of Relevant, Factual Information Received:

EPA offered a stakeholder call about the Notice of Data Availability associated with Clean Power Plan 

proposal.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350


(SECTION
906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
connection with the Annual Report of, MIP Solutions Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeff Lamberson,
President, Principal Accounting Officer and Director, and I, Gary McDonald,
Chief Executive Officer and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
June 3, 2009




By:
              /s/Jeff
      Lamberson
              
              /s/Gary
      MacDonaldJeff
      Lamberson
                President,
      Principal Accounting Officer and Director
              
              Gary
      MacDonald
                Chief
      Executive Officer and
Director
# IMMC.EESC-2021-04720-AC.ENG.xhtml.EESC-2021-04720-00-00-AC-TRA-EN.docx

| OPINION |
| --- |
| European Economic and Social Committee |
| Uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road |
| _____________ |
| Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road (codification)


  [COM(2021) 483 final - 2021/0275 (COD)] |
| |
| TEN/758 |

OPINION

European Economic and Social Committee

Uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road

_____________

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on uniform procedures for checks on the transport of dangerous goods by road (codification)

[COM(2021) 483 final - 2021/0275 (COD)]

TEN/758

EN

Referrals

| Referrals | European Parliament, 13/09/2021


  Council of the European Union, 24/09/2021 |
| --- | --- |
| Legal basis | Articles 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society |
| Adopted at plenary | 20/10/2021 |
| Plenary session No | 564 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 219/0/1 |

Referrals

European Parliament, 13/09/2021

European Parliament, 13/09/2021

Council of the European Union, 24/09/2021

Council of the European Union, 24/09/2021

Legal basis

Legal basis

Articles 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Articles 91 and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section responsible

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Transport, Energy, Infrastructure and the Information Society

Adopted at plenary

Adopted at plenary

20/10/2021

20/10/2021

Plenary session No

Plenary session No

564

564

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions)

219/0/1

219/0/1

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 564th plenary session of 20 and 21 October 2021 (meeting of 20 October), by 219 votes with one abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the content of the proposal and feels that it requires no comment on its part, it decided, at its 564th plenary session of 20 and 21 October 2021 (meeting of 20 October), by 219 votes with one abstention, to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text.

Brussels, 20 October 2021

Brussels, 20 October 2021

Christa SCHWENG

Christa SCHWENG

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

The president of the European Economic and Social Committee

_____________

_____________
##### 



Fulbright & Jaworski l.l.p.
 Telephone: (713) 651-5151
    
    Facsimile: (713) 651-5246
  
       Very truly yours,/s/  Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P.
ATTACHMENT 2

RETIREMENT COVERAGE ERROR CORRECTION

Model Notice of Error Subject to Correction under FERCCA

BAL 02-103 Erroneous FERS Coverage in Effect for Less Than 3 Years

May 7, 2002
BAL 02-103 May 7, 2002

Attachment 2 Page 2

[Insert date]

Dear [Enter name of employee]:

We recently discovered a mistake in your retirement coverage. When you came to work

for this agency, we put you in the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS).

Unfortunately, we should have put you in the [Enter correct plan, Civil Service

Retirement System, Civil Service Retirement System Offset (CSRS Offset), or Social

Security (FICA)-Only]. We regret this error.

You have options on how we correct this error. A law called the Federal Erroneous

Retirement Coverage Corrections Act (FERCCA) affects how we correct this error. The

FERCCA also gives you an opportunity to decide whether you want to remain in FERS,

or have your retirement coverage retroactively corrected to the proper retirement plan.

The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is coordinating correction of all retirement

coverage errors affected by the FERCCA. We have entered your name in the FERCCA

File Database, which is maintained by OPM. In the near future, OPM will contact us to

collect your employment history so that they can provide you with options about

correcting the error. You will have an opportunity to receive counseling about each

option you have so that you can choose the retirement plan that’s best for you. We

won’t correct this error until you’ve had a chance to review the information OPM sends

you and make an election about your retirement coverage.

We realize that this error may cause you some concern and we regret that. We want to

make this as easy for you as we can. [Insert name of contact person] will be able to

answer any questions you have about your retirement benefits. He/She can be reached

on [insert telephone number, email, etc....]. Please don’t hesitate to contact us to ask

any questions you have.

Sincerely,

XXX
ATTACHMENT 1 - FEDVIP 

TABLE 1 

PLAN NAME CHANGES 

State 2008 Plan Name (Old) 2009 Plan Name (New) 

Southeastern, 

Midwestern, and 

Mid-Atlantic 

states 

CompBenefits 

(Dental Plan) 

Humana/CompBenefits Inc. 

Nationwide Spectera 

(Vision Plan) 

UnitedHealthcare Vision 

TABLE 2 

DENTAL PLAN SERVICE AREA EXPANSION 

States Plan Name General Location of New 

Areas 

Southeastern, Midwestern, 

and Mid-Atlantic states 

Humana/CompBenefits 

Inc. 

(formerly CompBenefits 

in 2008) 

Entire states of Arizona, 

California, Colorado, and 

Utah 

1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7628

CHARLES WAKEFIELD, JR.,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS;

CHARLES MOLONY CONDON, Attorney General of

South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-97-2131-6-8AK)

Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999

Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Wakefield, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Donald J. Zelenka, Chief

Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Charles Wakefield, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the

district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Wakefield v. South Carolina

Dep’t of Corrections, No. CA-97-2131-6-8AK (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Somsak Chivavibul,
certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period
covered by this report on Form 10-K of SLM Student Loan Trust 2012-5 (the Exchange Act periodic reports);

2. Based on my
knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing
and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer and administrator have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreement and administration agreement, as applicable, in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this
report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated party: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as indenture trustee.

Date: March 31, 2015



|                                                                     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/ SOMSAK CHIVAVIBUL                                                
|Somsak Chivavibul                                                    
|President and Chief Financial Officer (Senior Securitization Officer)
|Navient Funding, LLC
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-17241

D.C. No.

2:11-cv-02579-

HRH

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LIMITED

PARTNERSHIP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 12-17327

D.C. No.

2:11-cv-02579-

HRH
2 IN THE MATTER OF SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LP,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-16164

D.C. No.

2:12-cv-02700-

HRH

IN THE MATTER OF: SUNNYSLOPE

HOUSING LIMITED PARTNERSHIP,

Debtor,

SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING LP,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FIRST SOUTHERN NATIONAL BANK,

Defendant-Appellee.

No. 13-16180

D.C. No.

2:12-cv-02700-

HRH

ORDER

Filed April 21, 2016

Before: Alex Kozinski, Richard A. Paez,

and Richard R. Clifton, Circuit Judges.
IN THE MATTER OF SUNNYSLOPE HOUSING 3

ORDER

The slip opinion filed on April 8, 2016, is hereby

amended as follows:

1. On page 6 of the slip opinion, line 4, change <section

1325(a)(5)(B) of the Code> to <section 1129(b) of the

Code>.

2. On page 11 of the slip opinion, lines 6–7, change

<11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)> to <11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)>.

3. On page 25 of the slip opinion, lines 1–7, change

<Under section 1325(a)(5) of the Code, a plan’s treatment of

a secured claim can be confirmed if one of three conditions

is satisfied: the creditor accepts the plan, the debtor

surrenders the property, or the debtor invokes the cram down

power. Rash, 520 U.S. at 957.> to <Under section 1129(b) of

the Code, a plan can be confirmed even without the consent

of all impaired classes of creditors if the debtor invokes the

cram down power.>.

With these amendments, the petition for panel rehearing

is DENIED as moot. Future petitions for panel rehearing and

rehearing en banc may be filed from this Order.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3366 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow an individual to 

qualify for both teacher loan forgiveness and public service loan forgiveness, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mrs. LAWRENCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Education and the Workforce 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to allow an 

individual to qualify for both teacher loan forgiveness 

and public service loan forgiveness, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Teach Our Teachers 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. LOAN FORGIVENESS FOR TEACHERS. 

7 (a) PART B.—Section 428J of the Higher Education 

8 Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1078–10) is amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3366 IH

1 (1) in subsection (b)(1), in the matter pre2 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘5’’ and in3 serting ‘‘3’’; 

4 (2) in subsection (c)— 

5 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

6 (i) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting 

7 ‘‘$17,500’’; and 

8 (ii) by striking ‘‘fifth’’ and inserting 

9 ‘‘third’’; and 

10 (B) by striking paragraph (3); and 

11 (3) in subsection (g)— 

12 (A) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub13 paragraph (A); and 

14 (B) by striking subparagraph (B). 

15 (b) PART D.—Section 460 of the Higher Education 

16 of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087j) is amended— 

17 (1) in subsection (b)(1), in the matter pre18 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘5’’ and in19 serting ‘‘3’’; 

20 (2) in subsection (c)— 

21 (A) in paragraph (1)— 

22 (i) by striking ‘‘$5,000’’ and inserting 

23 ‘‘$17,500’’; and 

24 (ii) by striking ‘‘fifth’’ and inserting 

25 ‘‘third’’; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3366 IH

1 (B) by striking paragraph (3); and 

2 (3) in subsection (g)— 

3 (A) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end of sub4 paragraph (A); and 

5 (B) by striking subparagraph (B). 

6 SEC. 3. CONFORMING AMENDMENTS. 

7 Section 455(m)(4) of the Higher Education Act of 

8 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1087e(m)(4)) is amended— 

9 (1) by striking ‘‘428J,’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘428L, or 460’’ and inserting ‘‘, 

11 or 428L’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3409 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3409

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude payments received 
 under the Work Colleges Program from gross income, including payments 
                     made from institutional funds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2015

Mr. Smith of Missouri (for himself, Mr. Danny K. Davis of Illinois, Mr. 
Womack, Mr. Rodney Davis of Illinois, Mr. Barr, Mr. Holding, Mr. Long, 
  Mr. Rogers of Kentucky, Mr. Price of North Carolina, and Mr. Welch) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                             Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude payments received 
 under the Work Colleges Program from gross income, including payments 
                     made from institutional funds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXCLUSION FOR AMOUNTS RECEIVED UNDER THE WORK COLLEGES 
              PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--Paragraph (2) of section 117(c) of the Internal 
Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``or'' at the end of 
subparagraph (A), by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (B) 
and inserting ``, or'', and by adding at the end the following new 
subparagraph:
                    ``(C) a comprehensive student work-learning-service 
                program (as defined in section 448(e) of the Higher 
                Education Act of 1965) operated by a work college (as 
                defined in such section).''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to amounts received in taxable years beginning after the date of 
the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
1The Hon. Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Court for the Eastern

and Western Districts of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 98-3127EM

_____________

Michael W. Schleeper, *

*

Plaintiff-Appellant, * On Appeal from the United

* States District Court for

v. * the Eastern District of

* Missouri.

*

Purina Benefits Association, a trust, * [To be Published.]

*

Defendant-Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: March 11, 1999

Filed: March 24, 1999

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FLOYD R. GIBSON, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

In this ERISA case, the issue is whether the employee-beneficiary failed to

exhaust his administrative remedies by not filing a timely intra-plan appeal. The

District Court1 held the claim barred by failure to exhaust. We affirm. 
-2-

Plaintiff argues exhaustion would have been futile. But no evidence to support

this claim was adduced, and we are unwilling to assume futility. Plaintiff points out

that he had already obtained one level of intra-plan review, and that his failure, if any,

related only to a second level of intra-plan review. The law does not forbid an intraplan appellate structure containing two levels.

Affirmed. 

A true copy.

Attest: 

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
| (logo) Prudential

  | Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.

  

Prudential Mortgage Capital Company 

2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 2500 Dallas, TX 75201

Tel 877-937-4500 |
|---------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association,

Commercial Mortgage Servicing

MAC D1086-120

550 South Tryon Street

14th Floor

Charlotte, North Carolina 28202

Attention:  WFRBS 2012-C8

 

 

Re: **WFRBS 2012 C8**

Period: **January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015 (the “Reporting Period”)**

 

 

Annual Compliance Statement

 

 

I, Timothy E. Steward, in my capacity as President and Managing Director of Prudential Asset Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) hereby certify with regard to the Company’s role as Primary Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, (the “Agreement”) dated as of August 1, 2012 pertaining to the above-referenced certificates, that:

 

(i) a review of the activities of the Company under the Agreement during the period noted above, and of the performance of the Company under the Agreement during the reporting period has been made under my supervision and

 

(ii) to the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Company has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement throughout the reporting period.  

 

 

Effective as of 2/24/2016

 

/s/ Timothy E. Steward

Timothy E. Steward

President and Managing Director 

Prudential Asset Resources, Inc.