alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### TEMPLE TRUST CO. et al. v. HANEY et ux.

No. 7279.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 30, 1937.

*369Jno. B. Daniel, of Ttemple, and Critz & Woodward, of Coleman, for plaintiffs in error.

Dibrell & Snodgrass, of Coleman, for defendants in error.

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case was prepared by Justice Baugh and is reported in 103 S.W.(2d) 1035. We have made an independent investigation of the questions presented in the applications and briefs filed in this court and have concluded that the Court of Civil Appeals has correctly decided each of them. It is, therefore, not deemed necessary or desirable for us to write further on the case.

As pointed out in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, there is a conflict between its holding that the contracts involved are usurious and the holding of the Amarillo court on the same questions in Temple Trust Company v. Cooper (Tex.Civ.App.) 96 S. W.(2d) 408. In so far as the conflict exists, our approval of the holding of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case will be understood as a disapproval of the holding in the Cooper Case.

The applications of both parties for writs , of error were granted, but since neither has been awarded any relief, one-half the costs in this court will be assessed against each.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals is affirmed.

Opinion adopted by the Supreme Court.
Exhibit 23.1**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No.333-142278 of DCP Midstream Partners, LP and DCP Midstream Partners Finance Corp. on Form S-3 ofour reports dated March 14, 2007, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financialstatement schedule of DCP Midstream Partners, LP (which reports (1) express an unqualified opinionand includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the preparation of the portion of the DCPMidstream Partners, LP consolidated financial statements attributable to operations prior toDecember 7, 2005 from the separate records of DCP Midstream, LLC (formerly Duke Energy FieldServices, LLC) and the basis of presentation of the consolidated financial statements of DCPMidstream Partners, LP to retroactively reflect DCP Midstream Partners, LP’s acquisition of thewholesale propane logistics business and the preparation of the portion of the DCP MidstreamPartners, LP consolidated financial statements attributable to the wholesale propane logisticsbusiness from the separate records maintained by DCP Midstream, LLC, and (2) express an unqualifiedopinion on management’s report on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,and (3) express an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of DCP Midstream Partners, LP for the yearended December 31, 2006, and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in the Prospectusof DCP Midstream Partners, LP and DCP Midstream Partners Finance Corp., which is part of thisRegistration Statement./s/ Deloitte & Touche LLPDenver, Colorado
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 April 2, 2020

izm

Order 

Clerk

April 2, 2020

161003 (23)

UMAR MUHAMMAD, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 161003 

COA: 350986 

LAKELAND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY 

WARDEN, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_______________________________________/

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion to extend time is considered and it is 

GRANTED.

Within 21 days of the date of this order, appellant shall comply with the terms 

of the February 25, 2020 order. Failure to comply with this order shall result in the 

dismissal of this application.
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

ALEXIS MORA

- REYES , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee

.

No. 4D 23

- 440

[ April 13, 2023 ]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.801 motion from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County ; Ernest A. Kollra, Jr.

, Judge; L.T. Case No s

. 21

- 002048CF10A & 21

- 002812CF10A

.

Alexis Mora

- Reyes, Indiantown, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.
Affirm ed.

M AY , G ERBER and L EVINE , JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# Official Journal C 370/2015

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 370 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 587 November 2015 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 370

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 587 November 2015

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 370/1 | Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.7737 — Honeywell/Elster) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 370/1

Withdrawal of notification of a concentration (Case M.7737 — Honeywell/Elster) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 370/2 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2015/C 370/3 | Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries | 3 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2015/C 370/2

Euro exchange rates

2

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2015/C 370/3

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

3

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2015/C 370/4 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7821 — Ardian France/Solina) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 4 |
| 2015/C 370/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7784 — CF Industries Holdings/OCI Business) (
  1
  ) | 5 |
| 2015/C 370/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7542 — Griffin/Skanska/Starwood/Hotel Atrium) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 6 |
| 2015/C 370/7 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7749 — BMW/BMW Intec/Viessmann/DES) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 7 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2015/C 370/4

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7821 — Ardian France/Solina) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

4

2015/C 370/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7784 — CF Industries Holdings/OCI Business) (
  1
  )

1

5

2015/C 370/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7542 — Griffin/Skanska/Starwood/Hotel Atrium) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

6

2015/C 370/7

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.7749 — BMW/BMW Intec/Viessmann/DES) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
P. 1 

# OAR Box 1781 Prepped by Ollie Stewart



# Document

Number: 

# 75 ) IV-A- 8 Docket Number: 

# A-90-3 7

Printed 10/29/200810:46:21 AM Sheet 75of 142P. 2 . 91 9 54 1 550 9 OP G II G EP

A @00 3 PAG E 0 2 

# ft- 

# to 

# -3 7 :1V - « - ? Unite dSlate s Offic e o f Ai r Qus.lit y Environmenta l Protectio n Plannin g an dStandard s Agenc y Researc h Triangl e Park , N C 277 ) 1 Novembe r 200? . hhp:/ / Wff.epa . gov/1 1 li/nsr/ru k do v .htca l 

# Technica l Suppor tDocumen tfo rtitle Preventio n o f

Significan tDeterioratio n an d Nonattainmen tAre a Ne w Sourc e Revie w

Regulation s

NO V 2 2 200 2 V
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3034 

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage stamp in honor 

of George Henry White. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 13, 2015 

Mr. BUTTERFIELD (for himself, Mr. JONES, Mr. CLYBURN, Mr. AL GREEN

of Texas, Mr. CLEAVER, Ms. MAXINE WATERS of California, Mr. SCOTT

of Virginia, Mr. LEWIS, Mr. DANNY K. DAVIS of Illinois, Ms. PLASKETT, 

Ms. WILSON of Florida, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Mr. 

HASTINGS, Ms. ESHOO, Ms. LEE, Ms. BROWN of Florida, Mr. RICHMOND, Mr. FATTAH, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. BASS, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

CA ́RDENAS, Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. CLAY, Mr. 

JEFFRIES, Mrs. BEATTY, Mr. VEASEY, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi, 

and Ms. SEWELL of Alabama) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To provide for the issuance of a commemorative postage 

stamp in honor of George Henry White. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3034 IH

1 SECTION 1. GEORGE HENRY WHITE COMMEMORATIVE 

2 POSTAGE STAMP. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Postmaster General shall 

4 issue a commemorative postage stamp in honor of George 

5 Henry White. 

6 (b) SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS.—Such stamp— 

7 (1) shall be issued in the denomination used for 

8 first class mail up to one ounce in weight; 

9 (2) shall bear such designs as the Postmaster 

10 General shall determine; and 

11 (3) shall be placed on sale as soon as prac12 ticable after the date of the enactment of this Act 

13 and shall be sold for such period thereafter as the 

14 Postmaster General shall determine. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Motion of the Consolidated Carriers to Exclude Data of Peninsula Airways
<PAGE>

MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 23.3 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM--MOORE
STEPHENS DOEREN MAYHEW

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 No. 33-48351 and S-8 No. 333-67539) pertaining to the Maxco, Inc. Incentive
Stock Option Plan and the Maxco, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, and in the related
prospectus of our report dated March 19, 2003, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Integral Vision, Inc. for the year ended
December 31, 2002 incorporated by reference from the Maxco, Inc. Annual Report
(Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 2004.

                                                /S/ MOORE STEPHENS DOEREN MAYHEW

Troy, Michigan
July 13, 2004
# C_2023109EN.01008001.xml

| 24.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 109/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 109/80

---

Corrigendum to Position (EU) No .../2023 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo *)

Adopted by the Council on 9 March 2023

(
  Official Journal of the European Union C 105 of 21 March 2023
  )

(2023/C 109/06)

On the cover, in the table of contents, and on page 4, the title should read:

‘POSITION (EU) No 1/2023 OF THE COUNCIL AT FIRST READING

with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1806 listing the third countries whose nationals must be in possession of visas when crossing the external borders and those whose nationals are exempt from that requirement (Kosovo *)

Adopted by the Council on 9 March 2023’

---
# Official Journal L 206/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 206 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6411 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 206

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6411 June 2021

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (recast) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EU) 2021/821 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2021 setting up a Union regime for the control of exports, brokering, technical assistance, transit and transfer of dual-use items (recast)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Jesse McCULLOUGH, Appellant, v. Bertha McCULLOUGH, Appellee.

No. 3245.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Amarillo.

April 29, 1931.

For former opinion, see 20 S.W.(2d) 224.

Cook & Donaghey and Storey, Leak & Stor-ey, all of Vernon, for appellant.

Marvin O. Culbertson, of Vernon, for ap-pellee.

HALL, C. J.

Upon submission, the judgment of the trial court was affirmed. 20 S.W.(2d) 224. Appellant’s motion for rehearing and to certify was granted, and, in response to the certified questions, the Supreme Court [36 S.W.(2d) 459], speaking through the Commission of Appeals, holds that the plaintiff’s petition was sufficient as against a general demurrer and that there was evidence to sustain the statutory grounds for divorce set out in the peti-tiom

Based upon these answers, the motion for rehearing is overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.
**MAXCO,
      INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES**





**EXHIBIT
      23.3 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM—MOORE STEPHENS
      DOEREN MAYHEW**




Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Forms
      S-8
      No. 33-48351 and S-8 No. 333-67539) pertaining to the Maxco, Inc. Incentive
      Stock Option Plan and the Maxco, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, and in the related
      prospectus of our report dated March 19, 2003, with respect to the consolidated
      financial statements and schedule of Integral Vision, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2002 incorporated by reference from the Maxco, Inc. Annual Report
      (Form 10-K/A, Amendment No. 2) for the year ended March 31, 2005.





/S/
      MOORE
      STEPHENS DOEREN MAYHEW








Troy,
      Michigan


February
      2, 2006
# Official Journal C 256/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 256 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 577 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 256

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 577 August 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 256/01 | Communication on the publication of the quantity of arable crops production as referred to in Article 171(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 1 |
| 2014/C 256/02 | Communication on the publication of the quantity of beef and veal production as referred to in Article 170(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 3 |
| 2014/C 256/03 | Communication on the publication of the volume of olive oil production as referred to in Article 169(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 256/01

Communication on the publication of the quantity of arable crops production as referred to in Article 171(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council

1

2014/C 256/02

Communication on the publication of the quantity of beef and veal production as referred to in Article 170(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council

3

2014/C 256/03

Communication on the publication of the volume of olive oil production as referred to in Article 169(4) of Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council

4

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 256/04 | Euro exchange rates | 5 |
| 2014/C 256/05 | Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 | 6 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 256/04

Euro exchange rates

5

2014/C 256/05

Administrative Commission of the European Communities on social security for migrant workers — Rates for conversion of currencies pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 574/72

6

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES


EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 2, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Harlan M. Kent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Harlan M. KentHarlan M. KentChief Executive OfficerMay 17, 2011
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of B2 Health, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Quam, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ John Quam__________ John Quam, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer  February 23, 2009
#### Ralph A. BEATON et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lawton McFARLAND et al., Defendants in Error.

No. 7577.

Supreme Court of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1940.

Hamilton, Lipscomb, Wood & Swift, of Dallas, for Beaton.

Touchstone, Wight, Gormley, Strasburger & Price, of Dallas, for Flippen.

Frank Wilson and J. L. Zumwalt, both of Dallas, for defendants in error.

CRITZ, Justice.

The opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, which is reported at 126 S.W.2d 719, correctly states the record and the law questions involved in this case, and correctly decides such law questions. Fidelity Union Insurance Co. v. Tate Hutchins et al., Tex.Sup., 133 S.W.2d 105.

In the case just cited we, in principle, fully discussed and decided the law questions involved in the retrial of this case. As we interpret it, the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals in this case is in harmony with our opinion in the Hutchins case. We therefore adopt the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals as so interpreted.

The judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, which reverses the judgment of the 'district court and remands the cause to the district court for trial on its merits, is affirmed.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 23, 2007
    
    /s/ DON R. MADISON

Don R. MadisonExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial
and Administrative Officer
#### The State, ex rel. Stegmoyer, *v.*Industrial Commission of Ohio.

(No. 28758

Decided April 15, 1942.)

*Mr. John G. Thompson,*for relator.

*Mr. Thomas J. Herbert,*attorney general, and *Mr. E. P. Felher,*for respondent.

*545By the Court.

Belatrix filed an application for workmen’s compensation for an alleged injury received on March 19, 1936, and the Industrial Commission denied compensation on July 9, 1936, notice of which denial was received by relatrix on July 15, 1936. No application for rehearing was filed until August 20, 1936, and on September 14, 1936, the commission dismissed the application for rehearing for the reason that it had not been filed within the 30-day limitation prescribed by Section 1465-90, General Code.

Thereafter the claim for compensation was before the commission upon two applications for reconsideration and another application for rehearing, all of which were dismissed.

Two years and four months after the last rehearing application was dismissed, there was filed in this court a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel the commission to rehear the claim and make a transcript of the record upon such rehearing. The cause was submitted upon the petition, answer, reply and stipulation that the record of the Industrial Commission should constitute the evidence in the case.

The record contains an affidavit of the relatrix filed on December 11, 1937, in support of her second application for reconsideration which had been filed almost five months before. That affidavit states that relatrix with her father visited the branch office of the commission béfore the expiration of the 30-day period and she was told by the young lady at the information desk that an application for rehearing *could not*he filed within 3Ó days and that relatrix had two more days to wait. The affidavit recites that the father of relatrix “heard this and said it was strange, as he once had a claim in the Industrial Commission and he had had to file it within 30 days,” hut he said relatrix should do as she had been told.

No application for rehearing having been filed with the commission within 30 days after relatrix received *546notice of the denial of her claim, a writ of mandamus will he denied. *State, ex rel. Allen,*v. *Industrial Commission,*127 Ohio St., 541, 189 N. E., 503, and *State, ex rel. Sheppler,*v. *Industrial Commission,*123 Ohio St., 256, 174 N. E., 764.

*Writ denied.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.