# Official Journal L 285/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.285.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 285 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5629 October 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.285.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 285

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5629 October 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1047/2013 of 21 August 2013 amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 for the purpose of correcting the 2010 average specific CO2 emissions specified for the manufacturer Piaggio (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1048/2013 of 28 October 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 laying down detailed rules of application for the marketing years 2009/2010 to 2014/2015 for the import and refining of sugar products of tariff heading 1701 under preferential agreements | 2 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 1049/2013 of 25 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in EU and international waters of I, II and XIV by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom | 4 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1050/2013 of 28 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 6 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2013/530/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 16 September 2013 on the compensations under the manure decree C 75/98 (ex NN 45/98) implemented by Belgium (Flanders)
  (notified under document C(2013) 5818) | 8 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 1047/2013 of 21 August 2013 amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 for the purpose of correcting the 2010 average specific CO2 emissions specified for the manufacturer Piaggio (
  1
  )

2

1

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1048/2013 of 28 October 2013 amending Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 laying down detailed rules of application for the marketing years 2009/2010 to 2014/2015 for the import and refining of sugar products of tariff heading 1701 under preferential agreements

2

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 1049/2013 of 25 October 2013 establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in EU and international waters of I, II and XIV by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom

4

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1050/2013 of 28 October 2013 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

6

DECISIONS

2013/530/EU

*

Commission Decision of 16 September 2013 on the compensations under the manure decree C 75/98 (ex NN 45/98) implemented by Belgium (Flanders)
  (notified under document C(2013) 5818)

(notified under document C(2013) 5818)

8

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.

---

II Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/1

---

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No 1047/2013

of 21 August 2013

amending Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 for the purpose of correcting the 2010 average specific CO2 emissions specified for the manufacturer Piaggio

(Text with EEA relevance)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 setting emission performance standards for new light commercial vehicles as part of the Union’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles (1), and in particular Article 11(7) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | The manufacturer of light commercial vehicles, Piaggio, has informed the Commission that the average specific CO2 emissions in 2010 specified for that manufacturer in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 of 6 November 2012 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to rules for the application for a derogation from the specific CO2 emissions targets for new light commercial vehicles (2) are incorrect. The manufacturer has provided detailed evidence demonstrating that the average specific CO2 emissions in 2010 were significantly higher than the value indicated in that Regulation. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

The manufacturer of light commercial vehicles, Piaggio, has informed the Commission that the average specific CO2 emissions in 2010 specified for that manufacturer in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 of 6 November 2012 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 510/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to rules for the application for a derogation from the specific CO2 emissions targets for new light commercial vehicles (2) are incorrect. The manufacturer has provided detailed evidence demonstrating that the average specific CO2 emissions in 2010 were significantly higher than the value indicated in that Regulation.

| (2) | The Commission has assessed the evidence provided by Piaggio and considers that it is appropriate to correct the value. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission has assessed the evidence provided by Piaggio and considers that it is appropriate to correct the value.

| (3) | Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 should therefore be amended accordingly, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013 should therefore be amended accordingly,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

In the list in Annex III to Delegated Regulation (EU) No 114/2013, the entry in the second column, with the heading ‘Average emissions, (g/km)’, for the make ‘Piaggio’ is replaced by ‘177,00’.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the 20th day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 21 August 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 145, 31.5.2011, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 38, 9.2.2013, p. 1.

2

---

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/2

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1048/2013

of 28 October 2013

amending Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 laying down detailed rules of application for the marketing years 2009/2010 to 2014/2015 for the import and refining of sugar products of tariff heading 1701 under preferential agreements

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 of 22 July 2008 applying a scheme of generalised tariff preferences from 1 January 2009 and amending Regulations (EC) No 552/97, (EC) No 1933/2006 and Commission Regulations (EC) No 1100/2006 and (EC) No 964/2007 (1) and in particular Article 11(7) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Pursuant to Article 1(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 (2), a country listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 is eligible to be added to Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Pursuant to Article 1(4) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 (2), a country listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 is eligible to be added to Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009.

| (2) | Myanmar/Burma has been reinstated into to the scheme of generalised tariff preferences on 19 July 2013, with retroactive effect as from 13 June 2012, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 607/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 552/97 temporarily withdrawing access to generalised tariff preferences from Myanmar/Burma (3). |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Myanmar/Burma has been reinstated into to the scheme of generalised tariff preferences on 19 July 2013, with retroactive effect as from 13 June 2012, pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 607/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 June 2013 repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 552/97 temporarily withdrawing access to generalised tariff preferences from Myanmar/Burma (3).

| (3) | Myanmar/Burma is a least-developed country listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 and has requested the Commission to be listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009. Myanmar/Burma produces sugar and is therefore a potential exporter to the Union. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

Myanmar/Burma is a least-developed country listed as least-developed country in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 732/2008 and has requested the Commission to be listed in Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009. Myanmar/Burma produces sugar and is therefore a potential exporter to the Union.

| (4) | Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 should therefore be amended accordingly.

| (5) | The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets, |
| --- | --- |

(5)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Management Committee for the Common Organisation of Agricultural Markets,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Part I of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 is replaced by the text in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2013.

For the Commission

The President

José Manuel BARROSO

---

(1)  
  OJ L 211, 6.8.2008, p. 1.

1

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 828/2009 of 10 September 2009 laying down detailed rules of application for the marketing years 2009/2010 to 2014/2015 for the import and refining of sugar products of tariff heading 1701 under preferential agreements (OJ L 240, 11.9.2009, p. 14).

2

(3)  
  OJ L 181, 29.6.2013, p. 13.

3

---

ANNEX

‘Part I: Least Developed Countries

| Group label | Third country | Reference number |
| --- | --- | --- |
| NON-ACP-LDC | Bangladesh
  Cambodia
  Laos
  Myanmar/Burma
  Nepal | 09.4221 |
| ACP-LDC | Benin
  Burkina Faso
  Democratic Republic of Congo
  Ethiopia
  Madagascar
  Malawi
  Mozambique
  Senegal
  Sierra Leone
  Sudan
  Tanzania
  Togo
  Uganda
  Zambia | 09.4231’ |

Group label

Third country

Reference number

NON-ACP-LDC

Bangladesh

Cambodia

Laos

Myanmar/Burma

Nepal

09.4221

ACP-LDC

Benin

Burkina Faso

Democratic Republic of Congo

Ethiopia

Madagascar

Malawi

Mozambique

Senegal

Sierra Leone

Sudan

Tanzania

Togo

Uganda

Zambia

09.4231’

---

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/4

---

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 1049/2013

of 25 October 2013

establishing a prohibition of fishing for tusk in EU and international waters of I, II and XIV by vessels flying the flag of United Kingdom

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), and in particular Article 36(2) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements (2), lays down quotas for 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Council Regulation (EU) No 40/2013 of 21 January 2013 fixing for 2013 the fishing opportunities available in EU waters and, to EU vessels, in certain non-EU waters for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks which are subject to international negotiations or agreements (2), lays down quotas for 2013.

| (2) | According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

According to the information received by the Commission, catches of the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein have exhausted the quota allocated for 2013.

| (3) | It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock, |
| --- | --- |

(3)

It is therefore necessary to prohibit fishing activities for that stock,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

Quota exhaustion

The fishing quota allocated to the Member State referred to in the Annex to this Regulation for the stock referred to therein for 2013 shall be deemed to be exhausted from the date set out in that Annex.

Article 2

Prohibitions

Fishing activities for the stock referred to in the Annex to this Regulation by vessels flying the flag of or registered in the Member State referred to therein shall be prohibited from the date set out in that Annex. In particular it shall be prohibited to retain on board, relocate, tranship or land fish from that stock caught by those vessels after that date.

Article 3

Entry into force

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Official Journal of the European Union

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 25 October 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Lowri EVANS

Director-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries

---

(1)  
  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 23, 25.1.2013, p. 54.

2

---

ANNEX

| No | 62/TQ40 |
| --- | --- |
| Member State | United Kingdom |
| Stock | USK/1214EI |
| Species | Tusk (Brosme brosme) |
| Zone | EU and international waters of I, II and XIV |
| Date | 8.10.2013 |

No

62/TQ40

Member State

United Kingdom

Stock

USK/1214EI

Species

Tusk (Brosme brosme)

Zone

EU and international waters of I, II and XIV

Date

8.10.2013

---

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/6

---

COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) No 1050/2013

of 28 October 2013

establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 of 22 October 2007 establishing a common organisation of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) (1),

Having regard to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 of 7 June 2011 laying down detailed rules for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 in respect of the fruit and vegetables and processed fruit and vegetables sectors (2), and in particular Article 136(1) thereof,

Whereas:

| (1) | Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 lays down, pursuant to the outcome of the Uruguay Round multilateral trade negotiations, the criteria whereby the Commission fixes the standard values for imports from third countries, in respect of the products and periods stipulated in Annex XVI, Part A thereto.

| (2) | The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union, |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The standard import value is calculated each working day, in accordance with Article 136(1) of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011, taking into account variable daily data. Therefore this Regulation should enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union,

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

The standard import values referred to in Article 136 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 543/2011 are fixed in the Annex to this Regulation.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 28 October 2013.

For the Commission, On behalf of the President,

Jerzy PLEWA

Director-General for Agriculture and Rural Development

---

(1)  
  OJ L 299, 16.11.2007, p. 1.

1

(2)  
  OJ L 157, 15.6.2011, p. 1.

2

---

ANNEX

Standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

| (EUR/100 kg) |
| --- |
| CN code | Third country code (1) | Standard import value |
| 0702 00 00 | AL | 53,3 |
| MA | 44,5 |
| MK | 32,3 |
| ZZ | 43,4 |
| 0707 00 05 | MK | 46,1 |
| TR | 147,7 |
| ZZ | 96,9 |
| 0709 93 10 | TR | 151,2 |
| ZZ | 151,2 |
| 0805 50 10 | AR | 12,9 |
| CL | 77,5 |
| IL | 100,2 |
| TR | 80,0 |
| ZA | 56,7 |
| ZZ | 65,5 |
| 0806 10 10 | BR | 234,0 |
| TR | 170,1 |
| ZZ | 202,1 |
| 0808 10 80 | CL | 167,7 |
| IL | 85,8 |
| NZ | 204,6 |
| US | 154,3 |
| ZA | 125,3 |
| ZZ | 147,5 |
| 0808 30 90 | CN | 52,7 |
| TR | 129,9 |
| US | 165,9 |
| ZZ | 116,2 |

(EUR/100 kg)

CN code

Third country code (1)

Standard import value

0702 00 00

AL

53,3

MA

44,5

MK

32,3

ZZ

43,4

0707 00 05

MK

46,1

TR

147,7

ZZ

96,9

0709 93 10

TR

151,2

ZZ

151,2

0805 50 10

AR

12,9

CL

77,5

IL

100,2

TR

80,0

ZA

56,7

ZZ

65,5

0806 10 10

BR

234,0

TR

170,1

ZZ

202,1

0808 10 80

CL

167,7

IL

85,8

NZ

204,6

US

154,3

ZA

125,3

ZZ

147,5

0808 30 90

CN

52,7

TR

129,9

US

165,9

ZZ

116,2

---

(1)  Nomenclature of countries laid down by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1833/2006 (OJ L 354, 14.12.2006, p. 19). Code ‘
  ZZ
  ’ stands for ‘of other origin’.

---

DECISIONS

| 29.10.2013 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 285/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2013

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 285/8

---

COMMISSION DECISION

of 16 September 2013

on the compensations under the manure decree C 75/98 (ex NN 45/98) implemented by Belgium (Flanders)

(notified under document C(2013) 5818)

(Only the Dutch and the French texts are authentic)

(2013/530/EU)

THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), and in particular the first subparagraph of Article 108(2) thereof,

Having called on interested parties to submit their comments (1),

Whereas:

I.   PROCEDURE

PROCEDURE

| (1) | Following receipt of a complaint that the Flemish Government was paying illegal aids to farmers in respect of their use of fertilisers and manure (hereinafter ‘the measure’), the services of the European Commission, by letter of 4 February 1998, requested the Belgian authorities to supply information about the implementation of the decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government on compensation payable to farmers for obligations under the legislation on fertilisers (hereinafter ‘manure decree’). |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Following receipt of a complaint that the Flemish Government was paying illegal aids to farmers in respect of their use of fertilisers and manure (hereinafter ‘the measure’), the services of the European Commission, by letter of 4 February 1998, requested the Belgian authorities to supply information about the implementation of the decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government on compensation payable to farmers for obligations under the legislation on fertilisers (hereinafter ‘manure decree’).

| (2) | The Commission received this information by a letter of the Flemish Minister for the Environment and Employment of 18 March 1998, and by a letter from the Permanent Representation of Belgium of 31 March 1998. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

The Commission received this information by a letter of the Flemish Minister for the Environment and Employment of 18 March 1998, and by a letter from the Permanent Representation of Belgium of 31 March 1998.

| (3) | A meeting between the representatives of the competent Belgian authorities and the services of the European Commission took place on 15 April 1998. |
| --- | --- |

(3)

A meeting between the representatives of the competent Belgian authorities and the services of the European Commission took place on 15 April 1998.

| (4) | By telex of 10 July 1998 the Commission requested additional information from the Belgian authorities to which an answer from the Belgian authorities was received by letter of 7 August 1998, registered on 10 August 1998. |
| --- | --- |

(4)

By telex of 10 July 1998 the Commission requested additional information from the Belgian authorities to which an answer from the Belgian authorities was received by letter of 7 August 1998, registered on 10 August 1998.

| (5) | According to information from the Belgian authorities, payments have been made in 1996. Still, the measure had not been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 93(3) EC (now Article 108(3) TFEU). For this reason, the file was entered in the register of non-notified aids under the number NN 45/98. However, although the scheme was in force in the years 1996 and 1997 the Commission noted the undertaking of the Belgian authorities in their letter of 7 August 1998 not to pay aid for 1997 until the Commission had reached a decision on the compatibility of the aid with the common market. The Belgian authorities informed the Commission that it was the Flemish Government's intention to incorporate this compensation scheme into the Flemish aid programme under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 (2). |
| --- | --- |

(5)

According to information from the Belgian authorities, payments have been made in 1996. Still, the measure had not been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 93(3) EC (now Article 108(3) TFEU). For this reason, the file was entered in the register of non-notified aids under the number NN 45/98. However, although the scheme was in force in the years 1996 and 1997 the Commission noted the undertaking of the Belgian authorities in their letter of 7 August 1998 not to pay aid for 1997 until the Commission had reached a decision on the compatibility of the aid with the common market. The Belgian authorities informed the Commission that it was the Flemish Government's intention to incorporate this compensation scheme into the Flemish aid programme under Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 (2).

2

| (6) | By letter dated 21 January 1999, the Commission informed Belgium that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU in respect of the measure. |
| --- | --- |

(6)

By letter dated 21 January 1999, the Commission informed Belgium that it had decided to initiate the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU in respect of the measure.

| (7) | The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published on 17 April 1999 in the Official Journal (3). |
| --- | --- |

(7)

The Commission decision to initiate the procedure was published on 17 April 1999 in the Official Journal (3).

3

| (8) | The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure. |
| --- | --- |

(8)

The Commission invited interested parties to submit their comments on the measure.

| (9) | The Commission received no comments from interested parties. |
| --- | --- |

(9)

The Commission received no comments from interested parties.

| (10) | Notifications concerning other Flemish manure cases (C12/1999, N105/1999, N311/99) were withdrawn by the Belgian authorities. |
| --- | --- |

(10)

Notifications concerning other Flemish manure cases (C12/1999, N105/1999, N311/99) were withdrawn by the Belgian authorities.

| (11) | On 6 March 2012 the Commission received a complaint from a farmer on the payment of compensation for 1996 pursuant to the manure decree. In a meeting between the representatives of the Belgian (Flemish) authorities and the services of the European Commission on 16 April 2012, the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to submit their views on the complaint. |
| --- | --- |

(11)

On 6 March 2012 the Commission received a complaint from a farmer on the payment of compensation for 1996 pursuant to the manure decree. In a meeting between the representatives of the Belgian (Flemish) authorities and the services of the European Commission on 16 April 2012, the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to submit their views on the complaint.

| (12) | The European Commission asked for additional information on 9 November 2012. The Belgian authorities replied by letter of 14 January 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(12)

The European Commission asked for additional information on 9 November 2012. The Belgian authorities replied by letter of 14 January 2013.

II.   DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE AID

1.   TITLE

| (13) | Compensation under the manure decree. |
| --- | --- |

(13)

Compensation under the manure decree.

2.   BUDGET

| (14) | The total budget for the measure for 1996 was BEF (Belgian francs) 427 511 868 broken down as follows:






  (a) | compensation for reduced yield






  — | grassland BEF 250 279 282 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

(14)

The total budget for the measure for 1996 was BEF (Belgian francs) 427 511 868 broken down as follows:

(a)

compensation for reduced yield

—

grassland BEF 250 279 282

| — | maize BEF 50 102 650 |
| --- | --- |

—

maize BEF 50 102 650

| (b) | compensation for manure disposal costs BEF 65 486 397 |
| --- | --- |

(b)

compensation for manure disposal costs BEF 65 486 397

| (c) | compensation for manure storage costs BEF 34 276 829 |
| --- | --- |

(c)

compensation for manure storage costs BEF 34 276 829

| (d) | compensation for purchase of additional fertiliser BEF 27 366 710 |
| --- | --- |

(d)

compensation for purchase of additional fertiliser BEF 27 366 710

Duration

Duration

| (15) | Compensation under the manure decree was paid out for the year 1996. |
| --- | --- |

(15)

Compensation under the manure decree was paid out for the year 1996.

Beneficiaries

Beneficiaries

| (16) | In accordance with the manure decree, compensation is payable to farmers whose undertaking lies, in whole or in part, within a water zone or a nature zone. This applies to 7,502 out of a total of 40,673 undertakings with arable land or livestock in Flanders (18,5 %). In terms of area, of a total of 649,223 ha under arable land or livestock, 47,948 ha (7,5 %) fall within a water zone and 21,919 ha (3 %) fall within a nature zone. |
| --- | --- |

(16)

In accordance with the manure decree, compensation is payable to farmers whose undertaking lies, in whole or in part, within a water zone or a nature zone. This applies to 7,502 out of a total of 40,673 undertakings with arable land or livestock in Flanders (18,5 %). In terms of area, of a total of 649,223 ha under arable land or livestock, 47,948 ha (7,5 %) fall within a water zone and 21,919 ha (3 %) fall within a nature zone.

Objective

Objective

| (17) | The objective of the aid scheme is to allow farmers with land in environmentally sensitive areas to be able to adapt to the more stringent standards on manure use, and to compensate for the economic loss suffered by those farmers. The aid is calculated on the basis of income lost, having regard to normal agricultural practice outside of these sensitive zones. According to the Belgian authorities, compensation was also necessary to avoid social unrest. |
| --- | --- |

(17)

The objective of the aid scheme is to allow farmers with land in environmentally sensitive areas to be able to adapt to the more stringent standards on manure use, and to compensate for the economic loss suffered by those farmers. The aid is calculated on the basis of income lost, having regard to normal agricultural practice outside of these sensitive zones. According to the Belgian authorities, compensation was also necessary to avoid social unrest.

| (18) | Aid is granted to compensate farmers in these sensitive zones for:






  (a) | the decrease in production resulting from lower fertilisation and manure use, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(18)

Aid is granted to compensate farmers in these sensitive zones for:

(a)

the decrease in production resulting from lower fertilisation and manure use,

| (b) | additional manure disposal costs, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

additional manure disposal costs,

| (c) | additional manure storage costs, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

additional manure storage costs,

| (d) | additional purchase of chemical fertilisers. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

additional purchase of chemical fertilisers.

Legal basis

Legal basis

| (19) | According to the information provided by the Belgian authorities, payments for farmers to compensate for obligations under the legislation on fertilisers were based on four legal texts:






  (a) | Decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government on compensation payable to farmers for obligations under the legislation on fertilisers, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(19)

According to the information provided by the Belgian authorities, payments for farmers to compensate for obligations under the legislation on fertilisers were based on four legal texts:

(a)

Decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government on compensation payable to farmers for obligations under the legislation on fertilisers,

| (b) | Decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government setting the compensation for the years 1996 and 1997 under Article 15(9) of the Decree of 23 January 1991 on the protection of the environment against pollution by manure, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government setting the compensation for the years 1996 and 1997 under Article 15(9) of the Decree of 23 January 1991 on the protection of the environment against pollution by manure,

| (c) | Decision of 19 March 1996 of the Flemish Government laying down rules on additional obligations with regard to disposal and on assistance with additional manure surpluses in areas where more stringent standards for manure spreading apply, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Decision of 19 March 1996 of the Flemish Government laying down rules on additional obligations with regard to disposal and on assistance with additional manure surpluses in areas where more stringent standards for manure spreading apply,

| (d) | Decision of 15 July 1997 of the Flemish Government amending the Decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government setting the compensation for the years 1996 and 1997 under Article 15(9) of the Decree of 23 January 1991 on the protection of the environment against pollution by manure. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

Decision of 15 July 1997 of the Flemish Government amending the Decision of 20 December 1995 of the Flemish Government setting the compensation for the years 1996 and 1997 under Article 15(9) of the Decree of 23 January 1991 on the protection of the environment against pollution by manure.

| (20) | None of these legal texts have been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 93 of the EC Treaty (now Article 108(3) TFEU). |
| --- | --- |

(20)

None of these legal texts have been notified to the Commission in accordance with Article 93 of the EC Treaty (now Article 108(3) TFEU).

Manure policy in Flanders

Manure policy in Flanders

| (21) | According to the Belgian authorities, manure policy in Flanders is based on the Decree of 20 December 1995 amending the Decree of 23 January 1991 on the protection of the environment against pollution by fertilisers. This decree aims to reduce the environmental problems caused by the enrichment of surface water and groundwater and the leaching of phosphates and nitrates into the soil, with the risk of penetration into ground and surface water. According to the report on the environment and nature in Flanders, agriculture accounts for 56 % of the net nitrogen and phosphate load on the environment. The discharging of ammoniac from livestock housing and the spreading of slurry account for 21 % of polluting emissions in Flanders. |
| --- | --- |

(21)

According to the Belgian authorities, manure policy in Flanders is based on the Decree of 20 December 1995 amending the Decree of 23 January 1991 on the protection of the environment against pollution by fertilisers. This decree aims to reduce the environmental problems caused by the enrichment of surface water and groundwater and the leaching of phosphates and nitrates into the soil, with the risk of penetration into ground and surface water. According to the report on the environment and nature in Flanders, agriculture accounts for 56 % of the net nitrogen and phosphate load on the environment. The discharging of ammoniac from livestock housing and the spreading of slurry account for 21 % of polluting emissions in Flanders.

| (22) | The manure decree sets out the objectives in relation to achieving and/or maintaining the requisite quality standards for soil, water (surface and groundwater) and air. It provides for the gradual tightening of restrictions on manure use. It thus allows for adjustments during a transitional phase. The standards governing fertiliser use are to be tightened gradually, except in particularly vulnerable areas, namely water zones and nature zones where stricter rules came into force immediately. |
| --- | --- |

(22)

The manure decree sets out the objectives in relation to achieving and/or maintaining the requisite quality standards for soil, water (surface and groundwater) and air. It provides for the gradual tightening of restrictions on manure use. It thus allows for adjustments during a transitional phase. The standards governing fertiliser use are to be tightened gradually, except in particularly vulnerable areas, namely water zones and nature zones where stricter rules came into force immediately.

| (23) | The decree also provides for a freeze on manure production and on the livestock headage in Flanders at the 1992 level. To that end a local permit policy is introduced. At the same time, for larger-sized undertakings the permit will be cut by up to 25 % upon renewal. The livestock farming sector was given time (until 2002) to find ways of reducing manure surpluses and their impact. |
| --- | --- |

(23)

The decree also provides for a freeze on manure production and on the livestock headage in Flanders at the 1992 level. To that end a local permit policy is introduced. At the same time, for larger-sized undertakings the permit will be cut by up to 25 % upon renewal. The livestock farming sector was given time (until 2002) to find ways of reducing manure surpluses and their impact.

| (24) | The more stringent restrictions came into effect immediately on 1 January 1996 in the following areas:






  (a) | water catchment and conservation areas, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(24)

The more stringent restrictions came into effect immediately on 1 January 1996 in the following areas:

(a)

water catchment and conservation areas,

| (b) | natural areas, nature reserves, forest land, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

natural areas, nature reserves, forest land,

| (c) | Bird Directive areas, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

Bird Directive areas,

| (d) | valleys and ecologically valuable farmland, |
| --- | --- |

(d)

valleys and ecologically valuable farmland,

| (e) | nitrate-sensitive land, |
| --- | --- |

(e)

nitrate-sensitive land,

| (f) | phosphate-polluted land. |
| --- | --- |

(f)

phosphate-polluted land.

| (25) | According to the Belgian authorities, the designation of these sensitive areas took account of the requirements of Council Directive 91/676/EEC (4) concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources and Council Directive 79/409/EEC (5) on the conservation of wild birds. |
| --- | --- |

(25)

According to the Belgian authorities, the designation of these sensitive areas took account of the requirements of Council Directive 91/676/EEC (4) concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources and Council Directive 79/409/EEC (5) on the conservation of wild birds.

4

5

General limits for the application of fertilisers and manure

General limits for the application of fertilisers and manure

| (26) | In accordance with the manure decree, the following general limits for the application of fertilisers and manure applied from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 1998 throughout Flanders, except for water zones and nature zones. These limits have been expressed in kg of phosphorus pentoxide, in kg of nitrogen from chemical fertilisers and in kg of total nitrogen per year permitted, as shown in the table below.








  Crop group | Phosphorous pentoxide | Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers | Total nitrogen |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Grassland | 170 | 250 | 450 |
| Maize | 160 (1996)
  155 (1997)
  150 (1998) | 200 | 325 |
| Crops with low nitrogen requirement (*1) | 125 | 125 | 170 |
| Other crops | 150 | 225 | 325 |

(26)

In accordance with the manure decree, the following general limits for the application of fertilisers and manure applied from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 1998 throughout Flanders, except for water zones and nature zones. These limits have been expressed in kg of phosphorus pentoxide, in kg of nitrogen from chemical fertilisers and in kg of total nitrogen per year permitted, as shown in the table below.

Crop group

Phosphorous pentoxide

Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers

Total nitrogen

Grassland

170

250

450

Maize

160 (1996)

155 (1997)

150 (1998)

200

325

Crops with low nitrogen requirement (*1)

*1

125

125

170

Other crops

150

225

325

| (27) | The Belgian authorities also published the following limits as indicative of the targets they wished to meet from 2003 onwards.









  Crop group | Phosphorous pentoxide | Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers | Nitrogen from livestock, manure and other fertilisers | Total nitrogen |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Grassland | 125 | 250 | 250 | 450 |
| Maize | 100 | 130 | 225 | 275 |
| Crops with low nitrogen requirement (*2) | 100 | 70 | 125 | 125 |
| Other crops | 100 | 150 | 200 | 275 |

(27)

The Belgian authorities also published the following limits as indicative of the targets they wished to meet from 2003 onwards.

Crop group

Phosphorous pentoxide

Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers

Nitrogen from livestock, manure and other fertilisers

Total nitrogen

Grassland

125

250

250

450

Maize

100

130

225

275

Crops with low nitrogen requirement (*2)

*2

100

70

125

125

Other crops

100

150

200

275

| (28) | In addition to these quantitative limits, on ordinary farmland it is prohibited to spread manure or other organic fertilisers during the following periods: from 21 September to 21 January, on all Sundays and public holidays, on all Saturdays, except those between 1 February and 15 May, at night (between 10 PM and 7 AM), when ground is flooded, frozen or covered with snow. |
| --- | --- |

(28)

In addition to these quantitative limits, on ordinary farmland it is prohibited to spread manure or other organic fertilisers during the following periods: from 21 September to 21 January, on all Sundays and public holidays, on all Saturdays, except those between 1 February and 15 May, at night (between 10 PM and 7 AM), when ground is flooded, frozen or covered with snow.

Limits for the application of fertilisers and manure in water zones

Limits for the application of fertilisers and manure in water zones

| (29) | Stricter standards apply in water zones with a view to the production of drinking water or because they are particularly sensitive to nitrogen leaching. The term ‘water zone’ stands for:






  (a) | water catchment areas and protection zones types II and III for groundwater, delimited pursuant to the Decree of 24 January 1984 laying down measures for groundwater management, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(29)

Stricter standards apply in water zones with a view to the production of drinking water or because they are particularly sensitive to nitrogen leaching. The term ‘water zone’ stands for:

(a)

water catchment areas and protection zones types II and III for groundwater, delimited pursuant to the Decree of 24 January 1984 laying down measures for groundwater management,

| (b) | sensitive areas identified by the Flemish Government as requiring stricter standards within the sub-hydrographic reservoirs of surface water intended for the production of drinking water, delimited in accordance with the Law of 26 March 1971 on the protection of surface water against pollution, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

sensitive areas identified by the Flemish Government as requiring stricter standards within the sub-hydrographic reservoirs of surface water intended for the production of drinking water, delimited in accordance with the Law of 26 March 1971 on the protection of surface water against pollution,

| (c) | areas of nitrate-sensitive land where stricter standards are required as determined by the Flemish Government and delimited pursuant to the Decree of 24 January 1984 laying down measures for groundwater management. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

areas of nitrate-sensitive land where stricter standards are required as determined by the Flemish Government and delimited pursuant to the Decree of 24 January 1984 laying down measures for groundwater management.

| (30) | The following table shows the standards governing manure use applicable from 1 January 1996 for water zones. These rules are based on the yield standards for the crop groups listed and environmentally acceptable losses for these zones. The quantities are expressed in kg of P2O5 and kg of nitrogen per hectare per year.









  Crop group | Phosphorous pentoxide | Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers | Nitrogen from livestock manure and other fertilisers | Total nitrogen |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Grassland | 120 | 200 | 200 | 350 |
| Maize | 100 | 150 | 170 | 275 |
| Crops with low nitrogen requirement | 80 | 70 | 125 | 125 |
| Other crops | 100 | 150 | 170 | 275 |

(30)

The following table shows the standards governing manure use applicable from 1 January 1996 for water zones. These rules are based on the yield standards for the crop groups listed and environmentally acceptable losses for these zones. The quantities are expressed in kg of P2O5 and kg of nitrogen per hectare per year.

2

5

Crop group

Phosphorous pentoxide

Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers

Nitrogen from livestock manure and other fertilisers

Total nitrogen

Grassland

120

200

200

350

Maize

100

150

170

275

Crops with low nitrogen requirement

80

70

125

125

Other crops

100

150

170

275

| (31) | In water zones, manure spreading is prohibited between 1 September and 21 January inclusive, except in zones A and B of areas used for surface water collection where the prohibition extends to 15 February inclusive. |
| --- | --- |

(31)

In water zones, manure spreading is prohibited between 1 September and 21 January inclusive, except in zones A and B of areas used for surface water collection where the prohibition extends to 15 February inclusive.

Limits for the application of fertilisers and manure in nature zones

Limits for the application of fertilisers and manure in nature zones

| (32) | The term ‘nature zone’ stands for:






  (a) | valley areas and ecologically valuable farmland as indicated on the rural development maps provided for in the Law of 29 March 1962 on the organisation of national and town planning, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(32)

The term ‘nature zone’ stands for:

(a)

valley areas and ecologically valuable farmland as indicated on the rural development maps provided for in the Law of 29 March 1962 on the organisation of national and town planning,

| (b) | special protection zones delimited by the Decision of the Flemish Government of 17 October 1988, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

special protection zones delimited by the Decision of the Flemish Government of 17 October 1988,

| (c) | specific habitats and adjoining buffer zones, |
| --- | --- |

(c)

specific habitats and adjoining buffer zones,

| (d) | forest areas, natural areas, nature development areas or nature reserves, as indicated in the rural development maps provided for in the Law of 29 March 1962 on the organisation of national and town planning, with a transitional measure applicable until 31 December 1997. |
| --- | --- |

(d)

forest areas, natural areas, nature development areas or nature reserves, as indicated in the rural development maps provided for in the Law of 29 March 1962 on the organisation of national and town planning, with a transitional measure applicable until 31 December 1997.

| (33) | The table below shows the standards governing manure use applicable from 1 January 1996 for nature zones. These rules are based on the yield standards for the crop groups listed and environmentally acceptable losses for these zones. The quantities are expressed in kg of P2O5 and kg of nitrogen per ha per year.








  Crop group | Phosphorous pentoxide | Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers | Total nitrogen |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Grassland | 120 | 200 | 400 |
| Maize | 100 | 150 | 275 |
| Crops with low nitrogen requirement | 80 | 70 | 125 |
| Other crops | 100 | 150 | 275 |

(33)

The table below shows the standards governing manure use applicable from 1 January 1996 for nature zones. These rules are based on the yield standards for the crop groups listed and environmentally acceptable losses for these zones. The quantities are expressed in kg of P2O5 and kg of nitrogen per ha per year.

2

5

Crop group

Phosphorous pentoxide

Nitrogen from chemical fertilisers

Total nitrogen

Grassland

120

200

400

Maize

100

150

275

Crops with low nitrogen requirement

80

70

125

Other crops

100

150

275

| (34) | In nature zones, manure spreading is prohibited between 1 September and 21 January inclusive, and on grassland areas of importance for the conservation of birds, manuring may also be prohibited between 1 April and 30 June. Furthermore, it is prohibited to apply any fertiliser of any kind in forest areas, natural areas, nature development areas or nature reserves from 1 January 1998, with the exception of droppings from livestock grazing the land, with a maximum permitted stocking rate of 2 livestock units per ha measured over the year. Family farms may obtain temporary exemption from this ban. |
| --- | --- |

(34)

In nature zones, manure spreading is prohibited between 1 September and 21 January inclusive, and on grassland areas of importance for the conservation of birds, manuring may also be prohibited between 1 April and 30 June. Furthermore, it is prohibited to apply any fertiliser of any kind in forest areas, natural areas, nature development areas or nature reserves from 1 January 1998, with the exception of droppings from livestock grazing the land, with a maximum permitted stocking rate of 2 livestock units per ha measured over the year. Family farms may obtain temporary exemption from this ban.

Compensation for decreases in production

Compensation for decreases in production

| (35) | According to the manure decree, compensation is paid automatically only in respect of grassland and maize. For other crops, it is assumed that the reduced levels of fertiliser use will not result in decreases in production. However, in the latter case, the farmer may obtain compensation if (s)he is able to provide evidence of losses. |
| --- | --- |

(35)

According to the manure decree, compensation is paid automatically only in respect of grassland and maize. For other crops, it is assumed that the reduced levels of fertiliser use will not result in decreases in production. However, in the latter case, the farmer may obtain compensation if (s)he is able to provide evidence of losses.

Compensation for decreases of production on grassland

Compensation for decreases of production on grassland

| (36) | Compensation for the change in yield of grassland is calculated on the basis of the difference between the permitted fertiliser standard in the areas outside of the sensitive zones, and the permitted standards in the sensitive zones, with a distinction between areas situated in water zones and those situated in nature zones. The objective of the aid is to compensate the loss of yield and profitability caused by those reductions. |
| --- | --- |

(36)

Compensation for the change in yield of grassland is calculated on the basis of the difference between the permitted fertiliser standard in the areas outside of the sensitive zones, and the permitted standards in the sensitive zones, with a distinction between areas situated in water zones and those situated in nature zones. The objective of the aid is to compensate the loss of yield and profitability caused by those reductions.

| (37) | The starting point for the calculation of the aid are the average semi-gross margins (SGM) in BEF/ha for the past three years preceding the granting of the compensation according to the income tax code. A distinction is made between land which is used for dairy farming and other grassland. For the purpose of calculating the SGM, Flanders is divided into 13 areas, depending on the agronomic characteristics of the area concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(37)

The starting point for the calculation of the aid are the average semi-gross margins (SGM) in BEF/ha for the past three years preceding the granting of the compensation according to the income tax code. A distinction is made between land which is used for dairy farming and other grassland. For the purpose of calculating the SGM, Flanders is divided into 13 areas, depending on the agronomic characteristics of the area concerned.

| (38) | For milk-producing grasslands, the highest SGM is in Antwerp Kempenland (55 700 BEF/ha), the lowest is in the Dunes area (33 167 BEF/ha), while the average for Flanders as a whole is 44 160 BEF/ha. For non milk-producing grasslands, the highest SGM is in the sand/loam region of West Flanders (36 100 BEF/ha), the lowest is in the Dunes area (24 633 BEF/ha), while the average for Flanders as a whole is 31 941 BEF/ha. |
| --- | --- |

(38)

For milk-producing grasslands, the highest SGM is in Antwerp Kempenland (55 700 BEF/ha), the lowest is in the Dunes area (33 167 BEF/ha), while the average for Flanders as a whole is 44 160 BEF/ha. For non milk-producing grasslands, the highest SGM is in the sand/loam region of West Flanders (36 100 BEF/ha), the lowest is in the Dunes area (24 633 BEF/ha), while the average for Flanders as a whole is 31 941 BEF/ha.

| (39) | For water zones, compensation is based on the fact that the maximum permitted level of nitrogen use is set at 350 kg/ha compared with 450 kg/ha for normal zones. This corresponds to a reduction of 22 %. According to the law of diminishing returns, the Belgian authorities calculate that this will result in a reduction of yields of 15 %. However, the effect on the profitability of the holding will be greater. After discounting fixed costs, the Belgian authorities calculate that on average the SGM amounts to 40 % of total yield. Thus a reduction of yield of 15 % will result in a 37,5 % reduction of the SGM (15 % × 100/40). The basis of the payment of compensation for reduced yields in the area concerned is thus SGM × 37,5 %. At the same time, in the water zones farmers are required to use 50 kg/ha less chemical fertilisers. This represents a saving of BEF 800 (50 kg N × 16 BEF/kg). This sum is therefore deducted from the aid payable. |
| --- | --- |

(39)

For water zones, compensation is based on the fact that the maximum permitted level of nitrogen use is set at 350 kg/ha compared with 450 kg/ha for normal zones. This corresponds to a reduction of 22 %. According to the law of diminishing returns, the Belgian authorities calculate that this will result in a reduction of yields of 15 %. However, the effect on the profitability of the holding will be greater. After discounting fixed costs, the Belgian authorities calculate that on average the SGM amounts to 40 % of total yield. Thus a reduction of yield of 15 % will result in a 37,5 % reduction of the SGM (15 % × 100/40). The basis of the payment of compensation for reduced yields in the area concerned is thus SGM × 37,5 %. At the same time, in the water zones farmers are required to use 50 kg/ha less chemical fertilisers. This represents a saving of BEF 800 (50 kg N × 16 BEF/kg). This sum is therefore deducted from the aid payable.

| (40) | For nature zones, compensation is based on the same principles. In a nature zone, the maximum permitted level of nitrogen use is 400 kg/ha compared with 450 kg/ha for normal zones, which corresponds to a reduction of 11 %. The Belgian authorities calculate that this will result in a reduction of yields of 7 %. A reduction of yield of 7 % will result in a 17,5 % reduction of the SGM (7 % × 100/40). The basis of the payment of compensation for reduced yields in the nature zones is thus SGM × 17,5 %. In addition, the same reduction of aid of BEF 800 (see above para. 39) is made in respect of savings from reduced fertiliser use. |
| --- | --- |

(40)

For nature zones, compensation is based on the same principles. In a nature zone, the maximum permitted level of nitrogen use is 400 kg/ha compared with 450 kg/ha for normal zones, which corresponds to a reduction of 11 %. The Belgian authorities calculate that this will result in a reduction of yields of 7 %. A reduction of yield of 7 % will result in a 17,5 % reduction of the SGM (7 % × 100/40). The basis of the payment of compensation for reduced yields in the nature zones is thus SGM × 17,5 %. In addition, the same reduction of aid of BEF 800 (see above para. 39) is made in respect of savings from reduced fertiliser use.

| (41) | The table below summarises the highest, lowest and average rates of aid payable.








  Milk-producing grasslands | SGM | Aid rate, water zones | Aid rate, nature zones |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Antwerp Kempenland | 55 700 | 20 088 | 8 948 |
| Dunes | 33 167 | 11 638 | 5 004 |
| Average | 44 160 | 15 760 | 9 928 |
| Other grasslands | SGM | Aid rate, water zones | Aid rate, nature zones |
| West Flanders sand/loam region | 36 100 | 12 738 | 5 518 |
| Dunes | 24 633 | 8 437 | 3 511 |
| Average | 31 941 | 11 177 | 4 789 |

(41)

The table below summarises the highest, lowest and average rates of aid payable.

Milk-producing grasslands

SGM

Aid rate, water zones

Formula

Aid rate, nature zones

Formula

Antwerp Kempenland

55 700

20 088

8 948

Dunes

33 167

11 638

5 004

Average

44 160

15 760

9 928

Other grasslands

SGM

Aid rate, water zones

Formula

Aid rate, nature zones

Formula

West Flanders sand/loam region

36 100

12 738

5 518

Dunes

24 633

8 437

3 511

Average

31 941

11 177

4 789

| (42) | The Belgian authorities emphasise that these are maximum compensation rates per hectare. The total area of grassland eligible for compensation is 31 003 ha, of which 17 468 ha are in the water zones, and 13 535 ha in the nature zones. The maximum theoretical compensation which might have been paid is BEF 202 822 411 in the water zones and BEF 65 900 155 in the nature zones. However, given the lower aid rates for non-milk grassland, the actual compensation granted for grassland was BEF 250 275 012 per year, of which BEF 186 505 640 were granted in water zones and BEF 63 769 372 in nature zones. According to the Belgian authorities, this difference between the maximum theoretical aid rates and the rates of aid actually paid is due to a number of factors, in particular the fact that compensation was only paid in respect of grassland which was already being used as grassland by the same farm in 1994. |
| --- | --- |

(42)

The Belgian authorities emphasise that these are maximum compensation rates per hectare. The total area of grassland eligible for compensation is 31 003 ha, of which 17 468 ha are in the water zones, and 13 535 ha in the nature zones. The maximum theoretical compensation which might have been paid is BEF 202 822 411 in the water zones and BEF 65 900 155 in the nature zones. However, given the lower aid rates for non-milk grassland, the actual compensation granted for grassland was BEF 250 275 012 per year, of which BEF 186 505 640 were granted in water zones and BEF 63 769 372 in nature zones. According to the Belgian authorities, this difference between the maximum theoretical aid rates and the rates of aid actually paid is due to a number of factors, in particular the fact that compensation was only paid in respect of grassland which was already being used as grassland by the same farm in 1994.

Compensation for maize

Compensation for maize

| (43) | For maize a flat rate aid for loss of production of BEF 3 600/ha applies provided that this maize is still grown on the same parcel, and not sown on former grassland that has been ploughed up. This aid is based on estimates that the average dry material production for maize is 14 500 kg/ha and the average loss of yield resulting from the stricter standards is 900 kg/ha. Based on an estimated cost price of BEF 4/kg dry material this results in a loss of income of BEF 3 600. |
| --- | --- |

(43)

For maize a flat rate aid for loss of production of BEF 3 600/ha applies provided that this maize is still grown on the same parcel, and not sown on former grassland that has been ploughed up. This aid is based on estimates that the average dry material production for maize is 14 500 kg/ha and the average loss of yield resulting from the stricter standards is 900 kg/ha. Based on an estimated cost price of BEF 4/kg dry material this results in a loss of income of BEF 3 600.

| (44) | In addition farmers are encouraged to sow grass after maize, thereby reducing the drainage of nitrates from the soil and nitrate leaching. For this, a further aid of BEF 3 600/ha was granted. According to the Belgian authorities this aid only covers the cost of grass seed. |
| --- | --- |

(44)

In addition farmers are encouraged to sow grass after maize, thereby reducing the drainage of nitrates from the soil and nitrate leaching. For this, a further aid of BEF 3 600/ha was granted. According to the Belgian authorities this aid only covers the cost of grass seed.

Compensation for additional manure disposal costs

Compensation for additional manure disposal costs

| (45) | Aid is provided to holdings in water and nature zones to cover the additional costs of disposing of manure surpluses which result from the lower limits on manure application. |
| --- | --- |

(45)

Aid is provided to holdings in water and nature zones to cover the additional costs of disposing of manure surpluses which result from the lower limits on manure application.

| (46) | Aid is granted if a holding has additional manure surpluses which have accumulated as a result of the stricter standards governing manure application. For the calculation of the aid, a distinction is made between:






  (a) | family livestock farms and other livestock holdings which did not acquire additional arable land between 1993 and 1996; the area of arable land according to the 1996 register is taken into account for calculating the possibilities for manure disposal; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(46)

Aid is granted if a holding has additional manure surpluses which have accumulated as a result of the stricter standards governing manure application. For the calculation of the aid, a distinction is made between:

(a)

family livestock farms and other livestock holdings which did not acquire additional arable land between 1993 and 1996; the area of arable land according to the 1996 register is taken into account for calculating the possibilities for manure disposal;

| (b) | non-family livestock holdings which did acquire additional land between 1993 and 1996; the area to be taken into account for determining the possibilities for manure disposal is based on the arable land recorded in 1994 (situation on the holding in 1993). |
| --- | --- |

(b)

non-family livestock holdings which did acquire additional land between 1993 and 1996; the area to be taken into account for determining the possibilities for manure disposal is based on the arable land recorded in 1994 (situation on the holding in 1993).

| (47) | For the purpose of calculating the aid a weighted average is used, based on the calculation of the number of animals of each species (cattle, pigs, poultry, others) in Flanders and the typical mineral composition of the manure from each species in terms of mineral content. |
| --- | --- |

(47)

For the purpose of calculating the aid a weighted average is used, based on the calculation of the number of animals of each species (cattle, pigs, poultry, others) in Flanders and the typical mineral composition of the manure from each species in terms of mineral content.

| (48) | On this basis it is estimated that each tonne of manure contains 6,6 kg of nitrogen and 4,2 kg of di-phosphorous pentoxide. |
| --- | --- |

(48)

On this basis it is estimated that each tonne of manure contains 6,6 kg of nitrogen and 4,2 kg of di-phosphorous pentoxide.

| (49) | Aid is paid per unit of mineral (per kg of di-phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5) and per kg of nitrogen (N)) eligible for compensation. The location of the holding determines the level of payment. The amount of aid payable is:






  (a) | BEF 13/unit: for holdings in a ‘white’ municipality with a revised output of < 75 kg P2O5/ha, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(49)

Aid is paid per unit of mineral (per kg of di-phosphorous pentoxide (P2O5) and per kg of nitrogen (N)) eligible for compensation. The location of the holding determines the level of payment. The amount of aid payable is:

2

5

(a)

BEF 13/unit: for holdings in a ‘white’ municipality with a revised output of < 75 kg P2O5/ha,

2

5

| (b) | BEF 20/unit: in a ‘grey’ municipality with a revised output of 75 to 125 kg P2O5/ha, |
| --- | --- |

(b)

BEF 20/unit: in a ‘grey’ municipality with a revised output of 75 to 125 kg P2O5/ha,

2

5

| (c) | BEF 27/unit: for one holding in a municipality with a revised output of > 125 kg P2O5/ha. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

BEF 27/unit: for one holding in a municipality with a revised output of > 125 kg P2O5/ha.

2

5

| (50) | The amounts of aid are higher for municipalities with higher revised outputs because the manure has to be transported over longer distances. |
| --- | --- |

(50)

The amounts of aid are higher for municipalities with higher revised outputs because the manure has to be transported over longer distances.

| (51) | In addition, aid is also payable to compensate farmers who are no longer able to take advantage of contractual arrangements with neighbouring farms to spread excess manure on those farms. To qualify, the holding must have entered into an arrangement for the disposal of excess manure in 1995 with a user with land in an area where the stricter standards apply and must be established in a municipality with a revised output of over 100 kg P2O5/ha. Compensation is paid per unit of mineral, i.e. per kg P2O5 and per kg N less disposed of to these users. The maximum quantity which may be eligible for compensation is the difference in disposal possibilities between the normal standards governing manure application and those applying in areas subject to stricter rules. The location of the holding determines the amount payable, which is:






  (a) | BEF 27/unit: one holding in a municipality with a revised output of > 125 kg P2O5/ha, |
| --- | --- | --- |

(51)

In addition, aid is also payable to compensate farmers who are no longer able to take advantage of contractual arrangements with neighbouring farms to spread excess manure on those farms. To qualify, the holding must have entered into an arrangement for the disposal of excess manure in 1995 with a user with land in an area where the stricter standards apply and must be established in a municipality with a revised output of over 100 kg P2O5/ha. Compensation is paid per unit of mineral, i.e. per kg P2O5 and per kg N less disposed of to these users. The maximum quantity which may be eligible for compensation is the difference in disposal possibilities between the normal standards governing manure application and those applying in areas subject to stricter rules. The location of the holding determines the amount payable, which is:

2

5

2

5

(a)

BEF 27/unit: one holding in a municipality with a revised output of > 125 kg P2O5/ha,

2

5

| (b) | BEF 20/unit for all other holdings. |
| --- | --- |

(b)

BEF 20/unit for all other holdings.

| (52) | Family livestock holdings with manure surpluses on parcels of land in the Kluizen sub-hydrographic basin for surface water collection or on nitrate-sensitive land on the banks of the Maas may take advantage of the obligation of the manure bank to accept additional surpluses of manure arising as a result of the stricter standards governing manure application. In this case the compensation for the disposal and storage of manure is reduced in proportion to the quantity of minerals for which the manure bank has provided assistance. |
| --- | --- |

(52)

Family livestock holdings with manure surpluses on parcels of land in the Kluizen sub-hydrographic basin for surface water collection or on nitrate-sensitive land on the banks of the Maas may take advantage of the obligation of the manure bank to accept additional surpluses of manure arising as a result of the stricter standards governing manure application. In this case the compensation for the disposal and storage of manure is reduced in proportion to the quantity of minerals for which the manure bank has provided assistance.

Compensation for increased storage costs

Compensation for increased storage costs

| (53) | Because manure spreading in water zones and nature zones was banned for the period starting from 1 September, instead of 21 September as in other zones, certain farmers encountered difficulties since on many farms manure is spread after the harvest and they harvest a number of crops after the (annual) start date for the ban. This was no longer possible in water and nature zones. The Belgian authorities estimate that as a consequence, these undertakings would require additional manure storage facilities for three months. |
| --- | --- |

(53)

Because manure spreading in water zones and nature zones was banned for the period starting from 1 September, instead of 21 September as in other zones, certain farmers encountered difficulties since on many farms manure is spread after the harvest and they harvest a number of crops after the (annual) start date for the ban. This was no longer possible in water and nature zones. The Belgian authorities estimate that as a consequence, these undertakings would require additional manure storage facilities for three months.

| (54) | The difference in standards governing manure application between ordinary areas and water and nature zones is equivalent to about 50 kg P2O5/ha. Since one tonne of manure contains an average of 5,2 kg P2O5, 50 kg P2O5/ha corresponds approximately to 10 tonnes storage capacity per ha required. |
| --- | --- |

(54)

The difference in standards governing manure application between ordinary areas and water and nature zones is equivalent to about 50 kg P2O5/ha. Since one tonne of manure contains an average of 5,2 kg P2O5, 50 kg P2O5/ha corresponds approximately to 10 tonnes storage capacity per ha required.

2

5

2

5

2

5

| (55) | Based on an estimate that the cost of building a 500 m3 storage facility is BEF 1 263 120 the Belgian authorities estimate that the provision of the necessary storage capacity involves an investment of about BEF 2 500 per tonne of storage capacity which will be amortised over 20 years, and is therefore equivalent to BEF 125/t/year. Annual compensation of BEF 1 250/ha is therefore payable to farmers producing livestock manure with arable land in areas where stricter rules on manure application and spreading apply. |
| --- | --- |

(55)

Based on an estimate that the cost of building a 500 m3 storage facility is BEF 1 263 120 the Belgian authorities estimate that the provision of the necessary storage capacity involves an investment of about BEF 2 500 per tonne of storage capacity which will be amortised over 20 years, and is therefore equivalent to BEF 125/t/year. Annual compensation of BEF 1 250/ha is therefore payable to farmers producing livestock manure with arable land in areas where stricter rules on manure application and spreading apply.

3

| (56) | Farmers who in 1996 received this compensation for manure storage under the manure decree cannot obtain interest-rate subsidies or capital premiums in the same year for building storage facilities for livestock manure under the Flemish Agricultural Investment Fund (VLF). |
| --- | --- |

(56)

Farmers who in 1996 received this compensation for manure storage under the manure decree cannot obtain interest-rate subsidies or capital premiums in the same year for building storage facilities for livestock manure under the Flemish Agricultural Investment Fund (VLF).

Compensation for use of chemical fertilisers

Compensation for use of chemical fertilisers

| (57) | Since farmers with land situated in water zones cannot fully make up the permitted quantity of nitrogen per hectare using animal manure, the Belgian authorities anticipate that farmers in these areas will endeavour to maintain production levels by applying additional chemical fertiliser especially for ‘other crops’ and for maize. |
| --- | --- |

(57)

Since farmers with land situated in water zones cannot fully make up the permitted quantity of nitrogen per hectare using animal manure, the Belgian authorities anticipate that farmers in these areas will endeavour to maintain production levels by applying additional chemical fertiliser especially for ‘other crops’ and for maize.

| (58) | It is assumed that these holdings will use an additional 60 kg of N/ha at a cost of BEF 16/kg. The aid payable therefore amounts to BEF 960 (60 × 16), which is rounded up to a flat rate BEF 1 000/ha. |
| --- | --- |

(58)

It is assumed that these holdings will use an additional 60 kg of N/ha at a cost of BEF 16/kg. The aid payable therefore amounts to BEF 960 (60 × 16), which is rounded up to a flat rate BEF 1 000/ha.

Procedure for the payment of aid

Procedure for the payment of aid

| (59) | Farmers with arable land in 1994 located in water and nature zones may apply to the manure bank, which is responsible for the administration of the scheme, for compensation in those areas. They are required to indicate on maps and plans their arable land parcel by parcel, with a crop plan for 1994 and for the year of application. If arable land is located in several areas or zones, the compensation is calculated on the basis of the strictest standards on manure application and spreading. The manure bank examines applications and informs those concerned as to what compensation will be paid, using all the information available to it. Compensation is not paid if it amounts to less than BEF 1 000. Applicants have a right of appeal to the Flemish Minister of the Environment, who is required to issue a decision within six months, otherwise the appeal is considered upheld. |
| --- | --- |

(59)

Farmers with arable land in 1994 located in water and nature zones may apply to the manure bank, which is responsible for the administration of the scheme, for compensation in those areas. They are required to indicate on maps and plans their arable land parcel by parcel, with a crop plan for 1994 and for the year of application. If arable land is located in several areas or zones, the compensation is calculated on the basis of the strictest standards on manure application and spreading. The manure bank examines applications and informs those concerned as to what compensation will be paid, using all the information available to it. Compensation is not paid if it amounts to less than BEF 1 000. Applicants have a right of appeal to the Flemish Minister of the Environment, who is required to issue a decision within six months, otherwise the appeal is considered upheld.

| (60) | The manure bank, police officers and officials of the environment inspection department of the environment, nature, land and water management authority and other officials are entitled to undertake checks that farmers are meeting their obligations under the manure decree. If infringements are found, farmers may be required to repay the aid. No aid may be granted under the manure decree for land covered by set-aside. |
| --- | --- |

(60)

The manure bank, police officers and officials of the environment inspection department of the environment, nature, land and water management authority and other officials are entitled to undertake checks that farmers are meeting their obligations under the manure decree. If infringements are found, farmers may be required to repay the aid. No aid may be granted under the manure decree for land covered by set-aside.

III.   ASSESSMENT OF THE AID

ASSESSMENT OF THE AID

| (61) | The measures described above constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty. The compensation originates from State resources and is paid to certain categories of farmers, i.e. those located in water zones or nature zones. This support distorts or threatens to distort competition and affect trade between Member States because it improves the competitive position of farmers receiving the compensation when compared with farmers in other parts of Belgium or in other Member States who are not in receipt of aid. Furthermore, in so far as the products produced by those farmers are the subject of intra-EU trade, the measures appear likely to affect trade between Member States. |
| --- | --- |

(61)

The measures described above constitute State aid within the meaning of Article 107(1) of the Treaty. The compensation originates from State resources and is paid to certain categories of farmers, i.e. those located in water zones or nature zones. This support distorts or threatens to distort competition and affect trade between Member States because it improves the competitive position of farmers receiving the compensation when compared with farmers in other parts of Belgium or in other Member States who are not in receipt of aid. Furthermore, in so far as the products produced by those farmers are the subject of intra-EU trade, the measures appear likely to affect trade between Member States.

| (62) | In their written observations the Belgian authorities have emphasised the environmental objectives of the aid scheme and in this context they have cited the provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside (hereinafter Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92) (6) and the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (7). Point 2.1 of the environment aid guidelines states that in the agricultural sector the guidelines do not apply to the field covered by Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92. It is therefore appropriate to begin by considering the application of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 to the measures concerned. |
| --- | --- |

(62)

In their written observations the Belgian authorities have emphasised the environmental objectives of the aid scheme and in this context they have cited the provisions of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside (hereinafter Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92) (6) and the Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection (7). Point 2.1 of the environment aid guidelines states that in the agricultural sector the guidelines do not apply to the field covered by Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92. It is therefore appropriate to begin by considering the application of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 to the measures concerned.

6

7

Applicability of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92

Applicability of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92

| (63) | The Belgian authorities explain that the compensation for farmers granted as part of the measure in the nature zones and the water zones should be seen as an implementation of the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92. |
| --- | --- |

(63)

The Belgian authorities explain that the compensation for farmers granted as part of the measure in the nature zones and the water zones should be seen as an implementation of the provisions of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92.

| (64) | Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 establishes a Community aid scheme which is intended to promote, inter alia, the voluntary use of farming practices which reduce the polluting effects of agriculture, on the basis of undertakings given by the farmer (Article 2(1)). Member States shall determine the conditions for granting aid, and the amount of aid to be paid, on the basis of the undertaking given by the beneficiary and of the loss of income as well as the need to provide an incentive (Article 5(1) (a), (b)). In addition, subject to conditions determined by the Commission, the Community may also contribute to certain premiums granted by Member States in order to compensate for income losses resulting from the mandatory application of the restrictions referred to in Article 2 in the context of measures implemented in those Member States pursuant to Community provisions (Article 4(5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92). |
| --- | --- |

(64)

Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 establishes a Community aid scheme which is intended to promote, inter alia, the voluntary use of farming practices which reduce the polluting effects of agriculture, on the basis of undertakings given by the farmer (Article 2(1)). Member States shall determine the conditions for granting aid, and the amount of aid to be paid, on the basis of the undertaking given by the beneficiary and of the loss of income as well as the need to provide an incentive (Article 5(1) (a), (b)). In addition, subject to conditions determined by the Commission, the Community may also contribute to certain premiums granted by Member States in order to compensate for income losses resulting from the mandatory application of the restrictions referred to in Article 2 in the context of measures implemented in those Member States pursuant to Community provisions (Article 4(5) of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92).

voluntary

| (65) | Furthermore, according to Article 10(1), Member States have the possibility to introduce nationally financed schemes for additional measures for which the conditions of granting the aid differ from the requirements of the Regulation or the amounts of which exceed the limits stipulated therein. These schemes have to comply with the objectives of the Regulation and State aid rules. |
| --- | --- |

(65)

Furthermore, according to Article 10(1), Member States have the possibility to introduce nationally financed schemes for additional measures for which the conditions of granting the aid differ from the requirements of the Regulation or the amounts of which exceed the limits stipulated therein. These schemes have to comply with the objectives of the Regulation and State aid rules.

| (66) | The scheme at issue is not aimed at providing compensation for losses linked to compliance with voluntary undertakings made by farmers. Nor does it involve Community co-financing of compensation in the context of measures implemented by Belgium subject to conditions determined by the Commission. Rather, the scheme concerns the (exclusively) national funding of compensation for losses stemming from compliance with obligations under the national legislation on fertilisers. |
| --- | --- |

(66)

The scheme at issue is not aimed at providing compensation for losses linked to compliance with voluntary undertakings made by farmers. Nor does it involve Community co-financing of compensation in the context of measures implemented by Belgium subject to conditions determined by the Commission. Rather, the scheme concerns the (exclusively) national funding of compensation for losses stemming from compliance with obligations under the national legislation on fertilisers.

| (67) | Therefore, the aid falls outside the scope of application of the Regulation and must be examined under the applicable State aid rules. |
| --- | --- |

(67)

Therefore, the aid falls outside the scope of application of the Regulation and must be examined under the applicable State aid rules.

IV.   APPLICATION OF THE COMMUNITY GUIDELINES ON STATE AID FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

APPLICATION OF THE COMMUNITY GUIDELINES ON STATE AID FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

General considerations

General considerations

| (68) | It is necessary to consider whether the measure may be considered compatible with the 1994 Guidelines laid down by the Commission in respect of State aid for environmental protection (8) (hereinafter ‘the Guidelines’) which were applicable at the time of the measure (9). |
| --- | --- |

(68)

It is necessary to consider whether the measure may be considered compatible with the 1994 Guidelines laid down by the Commission in respect of State aid for environmental protection (8) (hereinafter ‘the Guidelines’) which were applicable at the time of the measure (9).

8

9

| (69) | In this context it is necessary to note that the aid measures for the compensation of reduced yield on grassland or of maize, the aids for the disposal of manure surpluses and the compensation for additional costs of artificial fertiliser use constitute operating aids. In reply to a question from the services of the Commission, the Belgian authorities have explained that the manure storage costs, while comparable to the costs of investing in additional manure storage, are in fact not directly linked to actual investments. In the light of these explanations, the Commission considers that this measure should also be considered as an operating aid. |
| --- | --- |

(69)

In this context it is necessary to note that the aid measures for the compensation of reduced yield on grassland or of maize, the aids for the disposal of manure surpluses and the compensation for additional costs of artificial fertiliser use constitute operating aids. In reply to a question from the services of the Commission, the Belgian authorities have explained that the manure storage costs, while comparable to the costs of investing in additional manure storage, are in fact not directly linked to actual investments. In the light of these explanations, the Commission considers that this measure should also be considered as an operating aid.

| (70) | In general, the Commission considers that the payment of operating aids to the agricultural sector is unlikely to provide a lasting contribution to the development of the sector, and may entail a distortion of the conditions of competition which disadvantages farmers who are not in receipt of such aids. The Commission therefore takes a strict approach to the assessment of such aids. |
| --- | --- |

(70)

In general, the Commission considers that the payment of operating aids to the agricultural sector is unlikely to provide a lasting contribution to the development of the sector, and may entail a distortion of the conditions of competition which disadvantages farmers who are not in receipt of such aids. The Commission therefore takes a strict approach to the assessment of such aids.

| (71) | The payment of operating aid for environmental protection measures is dealt with in point 3.4 of the Guidelines. This reads:

  ‘In accordance with long-standing policy, the Commission does not normally approve operating aid which relieves firms of costs resulting from the pollution or nuisance they cause. However, the Commission may make an exception to this principle in certain well-defined circumstances. It has done so, so far, in the field of waste management and relief from environmental taxes. The Commission will continue to assess such cases on their merits and in the light of the strict criteria it has developed in the two fields just mentioned. These are that the aid must only compensate for extra production costs by comparison with traditional costs, and should be temporary and in principle degressive, so as to provide an incentive for reducing pollution or introducing more efficient use of resources more quickly. Furthermore, the aid must not conflict with other provisions of the EC Treaty, and in particular those relating to the free movement of goods and services.
  In the field of waste management, the public financing of the additional costs of selective collection, recovery and treatment of municipal waste for the benefit of businesses as well as consumers may involve State aid but can in that case be authorised provided that businesses are charged in proportion to their use of the system or the amount of waste they produce in their enterprise. Aid for the collection, recovery and treatment of industrial and agricultural waste will be considered on a case-by-case basis.
  Temporary relief from new environmental taxes may be authorised where it is necessary to off-set losses in competitiveness, particularly at international level. A further factor to be taken into account is what the firms have to do in return, to reduce their pollution. This provision also applies to reliefs from taxes introduced pursuant to EC legislation in which Member States have discretion as to the relief or its amount.’ |
| --- | --- |

(71)

The payment of operating aid for environmental protection measures is dealt with in point 3.4 of the Guidelines. This reads:

‘In accordance with long-standing policy, the Commission does not normally approve operating aid which relieves firms of costs resulting from the pollution or nuisance they cause. However, the Commission may make an exception to this principle in certain well-defined circumstances. It has done so, so far, in the field of waste management and relief from environmental taxes. The Commission will continue to assess such cases on their merits and in the light of the strict criteria it has developed in the two fields just mentioned. These are that the aid must only compensate for extra production costs by comparison with traditional costs, and should be temporary and in principle degressive, so as to provide an incentive for reducing pollution or introducing more efficient use of resources more quickly. Furthermore, the aid must not conflict with other provisions of the EC Treaty, and in particular those relating to the free movement of goods and services.

In the field of waste management, the public financing of the additional costs of selective collection, recovery and treatment of municipal waste for the benefit of businesses as well as consumers may involve State aid but can in that case be authorised provided that businesses are charged in proportion to their use of the system or the amount of waste they produce in their enterprise. Aid for the collection, recovery and treatment of industrial and agricultural waste will be considered on a case-by-case basis.

Temporary relief from new environmental taxes may be authorised where it is necessary to off-set losses in competitiveness, particularly at international level. A further factor to be taken into account is what the firms have to do in return, to reduce their pollution. This provision also applies to reliefs from taxes introduced pursuant to EC legislation in which Member States have discretion as to the relief or its amount.’

| (72) | As regards aids for the storage and disposal of excess manure, the Commission considers that excess manure may be considered as a form of agricultural waste. In accordance with the Guidelines quoted above, aid for the disposal of such waste is to be considered on a case-by-case basis in the light of the criteria of point 3.4 thereof. |
| --- | --- |

(72)

As regards aids for the storage and disposal of excess manure, the Commission considers that excess manure may be considered as a form of agricultural waste. In accordance with the Guidelines quoted above, aid for the disposal of such waste is to be considered on a case-by-case basis in the light of the criteria of point 3.4 thereof.

Aids for the storage and disposal of excess manure: assessment

Aids for the storage and disposal of excess manure: assessment

| (73) | The Commission notes that the present measure was temporary, in that it applied only for the years 1996 and 1997. Furthermore, the Commission notes that the Belgian authorities have not notified the continuation of direct aid payments for manure storage or disposal, although the arrangements for manure collection from certain farmers by the manure bank remain unchanged. |
| --- | --- |

(73)

The Commission notes that the present measure was temporary, in that it applied only for the years 1996 and 1997. Furthermore, the Commission notes that the Belgian authorities have not notified the continuation of direct aid payments for manure storage or disposal, although the arrangements for manure collection from certain farmers by the manure bank remain unchanged.

temporary

| (74) | The Commission must also take account of the fact that the aid measures are not degressive, since the same level of aid is provided for each of the two years in question (cf paras. 38-40, 49-51). |
| --- | --- |

(74)

The Commission must also take account of the fact that the aid measures are not degressive, since the same level of aid is provided for each of the two years in question (cf paras. 38-40, 49-51).

degressive

| (75) | Furthermore, on the basis of the information provided by the Belgian authorities, it appears that the measure is intended to compensate for the full costs of the storage and disposal of excess manure resulting from the restrictions imposed in the sensitive zones. Thus the farmers would be relieved of the charges for waste disposal. Also, there appears to be no requirement on farmers in the sensitive zones to take any steps to reduce their manure output. There is thus no counterpart from the farmers for the receipt of the aid, which simply compensates them for meeting the stricter standards on the use of manure laid down in the sensitive zones. Consequently, the measure does not create an incentive for reducing the production of manure. |
| --- | --- |

(75)

Furthermore, on the basis of the information provided by the Belgian authorities, it appears that the measure is intended to compensate for the full costs of the storage and disposal of excess manure resulting from the restrictions imposed in the sensitive zones. Thus the farmers would be relieved of the charges for waste disposal. Also, there appears to be no requirement on farmers in the sensitive zones to take any steps to reduce their manure output. There is thus no counterpart from the farmers for the receipt of the aid, which simply compensates them for meeting the stricter standards on the use of manure laid down in the sensitive zones. Consequently, the measure does not create an incentive for reducing the production of manure.

no counterpart from the farmers for the receipt of the aid

| (76) | For these reasons, the Commission considers that the measures do not comply with the Guidelines and are not in line with the objectives of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92. Hence, the Commission considers that they are not compatible with the internal market. |
| --- | --- |

(76)

For these reasons, the Commission considers that the measures do not comply with the Guidelines and are not in line with the objectives of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92. Hence, the Commission considers that they are not compatible with the internal market.

Aids for loss of production

Aids for loss of production

| (77) | As regards the aids to compensate farmers for production losses resulting from the restrictions on the use of animal manure, including the aid to compensate the additional costs of artificial fertilisers, the Commission notes that aids for production losses are not specifically referred to in the Guidelines. Nevertheless, to the extent that restrictions on the use of manure result in reduced yields, they are likely to increase the production costs of farmers for the remaining crops. According to the principles set out in the Guidelines referred to above, it would appear that such aids may only be justified if the following conditions are met (10):






  (a) | the aid should be temporary and, in principle, degressive so as to provide an incentive for reducing pollution or introducing more efficient uses of resources more quickly; |
| --- | --- | --- |

(77)

As regards the aids to compensate farmers for production losses resulting from the restrictions on the use of animal manure, including the aid to compensate the additional costs of artificial fertilisers, the Commission notes that aids for production losses are not specifically referred to in the Guidelines. Nevertheless, to the extent that restrictions on the use of manure result in reduced yields, they are likely to increase the production costs of farmers for the remaining crops. According to the principles set out in the Guidelines referred to above, it would appear that such aids may only be justified if the following conditions are met (10):

10

(a)

the aid should be temporary and, in principle, degressive so as to provide an incentive for reducing pollution or introducing more efficient uses of resources more quickly;

| (b) | the aid must only compensate for extra production costs compared to traditional methods; |
| --- | --- |

(b)

the aid must only compensate for extra production costs compared to traditional methods;

| (c) | the aid must not conflict with other provisions of the EC Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(c)

the aid must not conflict with other provisions of the EC Treaty.

In addition, it follows from Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 that aid granted outside the ambit of the Regulation but with the aim to achieve one of the restrictions set out in its Article 2 must comply with the objectives of the Regulation.

The aid should be temporary and degressive

The aid should be temporary and degressive

| (78) | Since the aid only applied for a two-year period, it would appear to be temporary. In the submission of information from 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities confirmed that the measures were discontinued in 1998. |
| --- | --- |

(78)

Since the aid only applied for a two-year period, it would appear to be temporary. In the submission of information from 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities confirmed that the measures were discontinued in 1998.

| (79) | However, for the time the measure applied, there was no degressivity of the aid (cf. para. 38-40, 49-51), which therefore did not create an incentive for introducing more efficient uses of resources more quickly. |
| --- | --- |

(79)

However, for the time the measure applied, there was no degressivity of the aid (cf. para. 38-40, 49-51), which therefore did not create an incentive for introducing more efficient uses of resources more quickly.

Absence of over-compensation

Absence of over-compensation

| (80) | As noted above, compensation for loss of production on grassland is calculated by reference to the total fertiliser use permitted in the non-sensitive zones, namely 450 kg N/ha for grassland and 325 kg N/ha maize. According to the Belgian authorities, these figures have been calculated on a scientific basis in order to ensure that the nitrate concentration of ground water and surface water does not exceed 50 mg NO3-N/l, or 11,3 mg NO3-N/l, taking into account an average permissible loss of 70 kg NO3-N/l per hectare per year. Their objective is to combine optimum production with minimum leaching. The limits for the nature zones and the water zones have been calculated in the same way, taking account of the fact that their nitrate status is more sensitive than for the other zones. |
| --- | --- |

(80)

As noted above, compensation for loss of production on grassland is calculated by reference to the total fertiliser use permitted in the non-sensitive zones, namely 450 kg N/ha for grassland and 325 kg N/ha maize. According to the Belgian authorities, these figures have been calculated on a scientific basis in order to ensure that the nitrate concentration of ground water and surface water does not exceed 50 mg NO3-N/l, or 11,3 mg NO3-N/l, taking into account an average permissible loss of 70 kg NO3-N/l per hectare per year. Their objective is to combine optimum production with minimum leaching. The limits for the nature zones and the water zones have been calculated in the same way, taking account of the fact that their nitrate status is more sensitive than for the other zones.

3

3

3

| (81) | In their letter of 7 August 1998, the Belgian authorities explained that is has been decided to calculate the compensation for the difference in standard based upon the total amount of nitrogen that can be legally applied, including both nitrogen from artificial fertilisers and nitrogen from animal manure. According to the Belgian authorities, this approach was used because it was considered necessary to ensure equality of treatment of farmers in a single region so that farmers whose land is situated in areas covered by more stringent local standards did not suffer in comparison with farmers whose land was not affected by such standards. If the standards were the same for all farmers in all areas this competitive advantage would be removed and no compensation would need to be paid. In this situation, if farmers make an effort to exceed the basic environmental quality standard, it is possible to calculate a compensation payment on the basis of the difference between what is achieved and the quality standard. |
| --- | --- |

(81)

In their letter of 7 August 1998, the Belgian authorities explained that is has been decided to calculate the compensation for the difference in standard based upon the total amount of nitrogen that can be legally applied, including both nitrogen from artificial fertilisers and nitrogen from animal manure. According to the Belgian authorities, this approach was used because it was considered necessary to ensure equality of treatment of farmers in a single region so that farmers whose land is situated in areas covered by more stringent local standards did not suffer in comparison with farmers whose land was not affected by such standards. If the standards were the same for all farmers in all areas this competitive advantage would be removed and no compensation would need to be paid. In this situation, if farmers make an effort to exceed the basic environmental quality standard, it is possible to calculate a compensation payment on the basis of the difference between what is achieved and the quality standard.

| (82) | Based on this principle of equality within the same region, the Belgian authorities considered that the applicable rules do not constitute over-compensation for farmers and/or compensation for ceasing agricultural practices which are contrary to EU regulations. According to their argument, the competitive disadvantage or advantage within a single agricultural region will be more pronounced within that region than within the EU as a whole. That is why, within Flanders, the entire loss suffered by farmers whose land is situated in the areas with more stringent local standards was compensated (for the actual loss at yield suffered). |
| --- | --- |

(82)

Based on this principle of equality within the same region, the Belgian authorities considered that the applicable rules do not constitute over-compensation for farmers and/or compensation for ceasing agricultural practices which are contrary to EU regulations. According to their argument, the competitive disadvantage or advantage within a single agricultural region will be more pronounced within that region than within the EU as a whole. That is why, within Flanders, the entire loss suffered by farmers whose land is situated in the areas with more stringent local standards was compensated (for the actual loss at yield suffered).

| (83) | Furthermore, the Belgian authorities pointed out that in 1996 and 1997 the Flemish region already imposed stricter local standards, while the nitrate Directive did not require this until 20 December 1998. In the sensitive water zones, a restriction of 200 kg N/ha has been imposed for grassland, while for maize and other crops it was 170 kg N/ha. Thus, according to the Belgian authorities, the permitted quantity of animal manure has, since 1996, already been lower than was stipulated under the first action programme under Directive 91/676/EEC, and for certain crops it has been limited to the level stated under the second action programme. |
| --- | --- |

(83)

Furthermore, the Belgian authorities pointed out that in 1996 and 1997 the Flemish region already imposed stricter local standards, while the nitrate Directive did not require this until 20 December 1998. In the sensitive water zones, a restriction of 200 kg N/ha has been imposed for grassland, while for maize and other crops it was 170 kg N/ha. Thus, according to the Belgian authorities, the permitted quantity of animal manure has, since 1996, already been lower than was stipulated under the first action programme under Directive 91/676/EEC, and for certain crops it has been limited to the level stated under the second action programme.

| (84) | On 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities provided detailed information on the method of calculation in order to show that this was in line with agricultural practice and with the EU legal provisions in force at the time of the measure. |
| --- | --- |

(84)

On 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities provided detailed information on the method of calculation in order to show that this was in line with agricultural practice and with the EU legal provisions in force at the time of the measure.

| (85) | However, based on the available information the provisions in the water zones and the nature zones do not appear to go substantially beyond the obligations set out in Directive 91/676/EEC. In this context, the Commission notes that the Belgian authorities themselves have indicated in their written observations that they had identified the water zones and the nature zones to be particularly sensitive to nitrate pollution, and that they therefore considered lower limits necessary in order to ensure that the target of 50 mg/l nitrates in surface freshwaters, in particular those used for the extraction of drinking water, and in groundwaters was attained. This was the level which was compulsory at the end of 1995 according to Directive 91/676/EEC. |
| --- | --- |

(85)

However, based on the available information the provisions in the water zones and the nature zones do not appear to go substantially beyond the obligations set out in Directive 91/676/EEC. In this context, the Commission notes that the Belgian authorities themselves have indicated in their written observations that they had identified the water zones and the nature zones to be particularly sensitive to nitrate pollution, and that they therefore considered lower limits necessary in order to ensure that the target of 50 mg/l nitrates in surface freshwaters, in particular those used for the extraction of drinking water, and in groundwaters was attained. This was the level which was compulsory at the end of 1995 according to Directive 91/676/EEC.

| (86) | Furthermore, as regards the method of calculating the compensation, the Commission requested the Belgian authorities to provide validated studies to demonstrate the accuracy of the assumptions used for the calculation. In particular, the Belgian authorities were requested to provide the results of studies demonstrating that a reduction in total fertiliser use from 450 kg N/ha to 350 kg N/ha does in fact result in a reduction in yield of 15 %, and that a reduction from 450 kg N/ha to 400 kg N/ha results in a reduction in yield of 7 %. The Belgian authorities demonstrated the accuracy of the underlying assumptions used for the calculation in their answer from 14 January 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(86)

Furthermore, as regards the method of calculating the compensation, the Commission requested the Belgian authorities to provide validated studies to demonstrate the accuracy of the assumptions used for the calculation. In particular, the Belgian authorities were requested to provide the results of studies demonstrating that a reduction in total fertiliser use from 450 kg N/ha to 350 kg N/ha does in fact result in a reduction in yield of 15 %, and that a reduction from 450 kg N/ha to 400 kg N/ha results in a reduction in yield of 7 %. The Belgian authorities demonstrated the accuracy of the underlying assumptions used for the calculation in their answer from 14 January 2013.

| (87) | Furthermore, the Belgian authorities were also requested to provide additional information on the assumptions used to calculate the effects of this loss of production on the overall profitability of the holding, using a range of hypotheses, including purely arable production and mixed arable/livestock production. In particular, the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to provide a detailed explanation as to why a 15 % loss of grass production in a mixed arable/livestock holding is considered to constitute a 40 % loss of profitability of the holding, taking into account the different types of livestock production. The Belgian authorities provided this information in their answer from 14 January 2013. |
| --- | --- |

(87)

Furthermore, the Belgian authorities were also requested to provide additional information on the assumptions used to calculate the effects of this loss of production on the overall profitability of the holding, using a range of hypotheses, including purely arable production and mixed arable/livestock production. In particular, the Commission asked the Belgian authorities to provide a detailed explanation as to why a 15 % loss of grass production in a mixed arable/livestock holding is considered to constitute a 40 % loss of profitability of the holding, taking into account the different types of livestock production. The Belgian authorities provided this information in their answer from 14 January 2013.

| (88) | Furthermore, the Belgian authorities were requested to provide calculations based on alternative methods of providing compensation, for example the cost of buying replacement feed as a substitute for the lost production. In their answer from 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities maintain that, as such calculations were not carried out at the time of the measure, it is not possible to make such calculations anymore. |
| --- | --- |

(88)

Furthermore, the Belgian authorities were requested to provide calculations based on alternative methods of providing compensation, for example the cost of buying replacement feed as a substitute for the lost production. In their answer from 14 January 2013 the Belgian authorities maintain that, as such calculations were not carried out at the time of the measure, it is not possible to make such calculations anymore.

| (89) | Therefore, in the Commission's view the Belgian authorities have not demonstrated that the aid was limited to the extra production costs only. Furthermore, as shown above (para. 79), the aid was not degressive. |
| --- | --- |

(89)

Therefore, in the Commission's view the Belgian authorities have not demonstrated that the aid was limited to the extra production costs only. Furthermore, as shown above (para. 79), the aid was not degressive.

| (90) | Hence, the granting of aid for loss of production does not fulfil the conditions of the Guidelines. For these reasons, the Commission considers these aid measures not to be compatible with the Treaty. |
| --- | --- |

(90)

Hence, the granting of aid for loss of production does not fulfil the conditions of the Guidelines. For these reasons, the Commission considers these aid measures not to be compatible with the Treaty.

V.   CONCLUSION

CONCLUSION

| (91) | The Commission finds that Belgium has unlawfully implemented the compensation under the manure decree in breach of Article 93(3) EC Treaty (now Article 108(3) TFEU). |
| --- | --- |

(91)

The Commission finds that Belgium has unlawfully implemented the compensation under the manure decree in breach of Article 93(3) EC Treaty (now Article 108(3) TFEU).

| (92) | The measures fall outside the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92. |
| --- | --- |

(92)

The measures fall outside the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92.

| (93) | The measures for the compensation for the storage and disposal of excess manure and the loss of production constitute operating aids which only exceptionally can be declared compatible. For this, the strict approach of the Guidelines foresees that the aid for storage and disposal can be declared compatible if it is temporary and degressive and if it requires a counterpart from the farmer. For the aid for loss of production, the aid should be temporary and degressive and only compensate for extra production costs. As analysed above, these conditions were not fulfilled. |
| --- | --- |

(93)

The measures for the compensation for the storage and disposal of excess manure and the loss of production constitute operating aids which only exceptionally can be declared compatible. For this, the strict approach of the Guidelines foresees that the aid for storage and disposal can be declared compatible if it is temporary and degressive and if it requires a counterpart from the farmer. For the aid for loss of production, the aid should be temporary and degressive and only compensate for extra production costs. As analysed above, these conditions were not fulfilled.

| (94) | In the absence of any counterpart from the beneficiaries for the receipt of the aid, and in so far as the aid measures do not appear to contain any incentives for the beneficiaries to take additional steps towards the improvement of environmental protection, according to the Commission, this aid measure does not contribute towards the development of certain economic activities within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

(94)

In the absence of any counterpart from the beneficiaries for the receipt of the aid, and in so far as the aid measures do not appear to contain any incentives for the beneficiaries to take additional steps towards the improvement of environmental protection, according to the Commission, this aid measure does not contribute towards the development of certain economic activities within the meaning of Article 107(3)(c) TFEU.

| (95) | The manure decree was abrogated in 1998 and all the measures were discontinued. |
| --- | --- |

(95)

The manure decree was abrogated in 1998 and all the measures were discontinued.

| (96) | For the reasons above, the Commission finds that during its period of application in the years 1996 and 1997 the measure constituted illegal and incompatible aid which in principle has to be recovered. |
| --- | --- |

(96)

For the reasons above, the Commission finds that during its period of application in the years 1996 and 1997 the measure constituted illegal and incompatible aid which in principle has to be recovered.

| (97) | Due to the fact that the powers of the Commission to recover incompatible aid are subject to a limitation period of ten years (11), this incompatible aid cannot be recovered. |
| --- | --- |

(97)

Due to the fact that the powers of the Commission to recover incompatible aid are subject to a limitation period of ten years (11), this incompatible aid cannot be recovered.

11

| (98) | Any individual aid which, at the time of the granting fulfilled the conditions of a block exemption or an approved scheme is compatible with the internal market, up to the maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid. |
| --- | --- |

(98)

Any individual aid which, at the time of the granting fulfilled the conditions of a block exemption or an approved scheme is compatible with the internal market, up to the maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid.

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

The State aid granted as compensation under the manure decree, unlawfully put into effect by Belgium in breach of Article 93(3) of the EC Treaty, is incompatible with the internal market.

Article 2

Individual aid granted under the scheme referred to in Article 1 which at the time it was granted fulfilled the conditions of a block exemption or an approved scheme is compatible with the internal market, up to maximum aid intensities applicable to that type of aid.

Article 3

This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of Belgium.

Done at Brussels, 16 September 2013.

For the Commission

Dacian CIOLOȘ

Member of the Commission

---

(1)  Invitation to submit comments pursuant to Article 93(2) of the EC Treaty, concerning the aid/measure C 75/98 (ex NN 45/98) – Belgium (Flanders) – Compensations under the manure decree, OJ C 108, 17.4.1999, p. 12.

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2078/92 of 30 June 1992 on agricultural production methods compatible with the requirements of the protection of the environment and the maintenance of the countryside OJ L 215, 30.7.1992, p. 85.

2

(3)  Cited above in footnote 1.

3

(4)  Council Directive 91/676/EEC of 12 December 1991 concerning the protection of waters against pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources, OJ L 375, 31.12.1991, p. 1.

4

(5)  Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, OJ L 103, 25.4.1979, p. 1.

5

(*1)  Including chicory, all fruit, shallots, onion, flax, legumes and carrots.

*1

(*2)  Including chicory, all fruit, shallots, onion, flax, legumes and carrots.

*2

(6)  Cited above in footnote 2.

6

(7)  Information from the Commission - Community guidelines on State aid for environmental protection, OJ C 72, 10.3.1994, p. 3.

7

(8)  Cited above in footnote 7.

8

(9)  See Commission notice on the determination of the applicable rules for the assessment of unlawful State aid, OJ C 119, 22.5.2002, p. 22.

9

(10)  Cited above in footnote 7, point 3.4.

10

(11)  Council Regulation No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, OJ L 83, 27.3.1999, p. 1, article 15.

11

---