alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2012 - 1015 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2007 - SW - 069 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
# Official Journal C 332/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.332.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 332 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5414 November 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.332.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 332

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5414 November 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 332/01 | Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors — Annual accounts of the European Union — Financial year 2010 | 1 |
| 2011/C 332/02 | The Court’s Statement of assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council — independent auditor’s report | 134 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 332/01

Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors — Annual accounts of the European Union — Financial year 2010

1

2011/C 332/02

The Court’s Statement of assurance provided to the European Parliament and the Council — independent auditor’s report

134

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### CRAWFORD et al. v. KENNEDY et ux.

No. 4580.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Nov. 21, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 6, 1934.

Abney, Bath & O’Banion, of Henderson, for appellants.

Young & Wynne, of Henderson, for appel-lees.

SEEDERS, Justice.

Appellees, M. J. (Major) Kennedy and wife, Mary E. Kennedy, brought this suit in the *544district court of Rusk county against Sam Crawford and Oliyler Webb to cancel a certain mineral deed recorded in Deed Records of Rust county in Yol. 213, page 389, on the alleged ground that appellees’ signatures thereto were a forgery. The evidence was conflicting as to whether the appellees were the parties who signed and acknowledged the deed. The deed was dated and acknowledged on April 11, 1932. No evidence was introduced that it was executed on any other date. The court submitted to the jury the following issue:

“Do you And from a preponderance of the evidence in this case that the plaintiffs, Major Kennedy and wife, Mary E. Kennedy, on April 11, 1932, did not sign, acknowledge and deliver to Sam Crawford the' instrument introduced in evidence in the case purporting to convey oil and gas and royalty interest in the Hobson Survey located in Rusk County, Texas?”

> Answer: “They did not.”

Upon the jury’s finding, the court entered judgment for appellees canceling the deed as a forgery, and appellant has appealed to this court.

The appellant has assigned error by the trial court in limiting the consideration of the jury to the date of April 11, 1932, in determining whether the appellees executed the deed, the contention being that the jury should not have been limited to any particular date. We are unable to agree with this contention. It is the trial court’s duty to submit only the issues of fact made by the evidence. Boyd v. Guinn (Tex. Civ. App.) 44 S.W.(2d) 1112, 1113. The deed involved being dated April 11, 1932, is presumed to have been executed on that date. S. A. Lacoste v. S. W. Odam, 26 Tex. 458; W. T. Carter & Bro. et al. v. Bendy (Tex. Civ. App.) 251 S. W. 265. And there being no evidence that appellees executed it on any other date, the court properly limited the issue to that time.

Appellant assigns as error the use of the word “purporting” in the issue submitted to the jury on the ground that the same as used was a charge upon the weight of the evidence, in that it assumes and tells the jury that the deed in controversy did not convey any interest in the minerals but only purported to do so, thus placing the burden upon the appellant to prove that the deed did convey some interest in the minerals. We think the word as used in the court’s charge to the jury was used only in a descriptive sense, having reference only to and for the purpose of identifying the instrument sought to be canceled. The pleadings and evidence make no issue as to what property was conveyed by the deed, and for that reason we fail to see how the use of this word could in any way have affected appellant’s rights.

Binding no reversible error in the record, the judgment of the trial court will be affirmed.
**EXHIBIT 35.1**

 

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**New Holland Credit Company, LLC**

 

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of New Holland Credit Company, LLC (“NHCC”), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012 (as amended from time to time, the “Sale and Servicing Agreement”) by and among NHCC, CNH Capital Receivables LLC and CNH Equipment Trust 2012-B, does hereby certify that:

 

1.                                      NHCC is Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement.

 

2.                                      The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Sale and Servicing Agreement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Indenture Trustee.

 

3.                                      This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 4.9(a) of the Sale and Servicing Agreement and Item 1123 of Regulation AB.

 

4.                                      A review of the Servicer’s activities during the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014 and of its performance under the Sale and Servicing Agreement has been made under my supervision.

 

5.                                      To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Sale and Servicing Agreement in all material respects throughout the 12 month period ending (and including) December 31, 2014.

 

6.                                      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 30th day of March, 2015.

 

----

 
| March 30,   2015 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   |
|                  |   |
|                  | By:    | /s/   Brett D. Davis |
|                  | Name:  | Brett   D. Davis |
|                  | Title: | President |

 

----
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3137 

To reaffirm the trust status of land taken into trust by the United States 

pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934, for the benefit of an Indian 

tribe that was federally recognized on the date that the land was taken 

into trust, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2015 

Mr. COLE (for himself, Ms. MCCOLLUM, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Mr. SESSIONS, Mr. BYRNE, Mr. BEN RAY LUJA ́N of New Mexico, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, 

Mr. GALLEGO, Mr. MURPHY of Florida, Ms. MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM

of New Mexico, Mr. GRIJALVA, Ms. MOORE, Mr. RUIZ, Mr. TAKAI, Mr. 

BENISHEK, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. KILMER, and Mr. SIMPSON) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To reaffirm the trust status of land taken into trust by 

the United States pursuant to the Act of June 18, 1934, 

for the benefit of an Indian tribe that was federally 

recognized on the date that the land was taken into 

trust, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REAFFIRMATION OF STATUS AND ACTIONS. 

4 (a) REAFFIRMATION OF TRUST STATUS.—Land 

5 taken into trust by the United States pursuant to the Act 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3137 IH

1 of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 465), before the date of en2 actment of this Act for the benefit of an Indian tribe that 

3 was federally recognized on the date that the land was 

4 taken into trust is reaffirmed as trust land. 

5 (b) RATIFICATION OF ACTIONS OF THE SEC6 RETARY.—Any action taken by the Secretary of the Inte7 rior for the purpose of acquiring and taking land into trust 

8 under the Act of June 18, 1934 (25 U.S.C. 465), is hereby 

9 ratified and confirmed as fully and for all intents and pur10 poses as if that action had been taken under a Federal 

11 law specifically authorizing or directing that action. 

12 (c) APPLICATION.—This Act shall apply to all claims 

13 (including claims challenging the validity of title or the 

14 effectiveness of any action of the Secretary acquiring and 

15 taking land into trust) pending on the date of the enact16 ment of this Act or filed on or after the date of the enact17 ment of this Act. 

18 (d) INDIAN COUNTRY.—Any land taken into trust 

19 that has been ratified and confirmed pursuant to this Act 

20 shall remain Indian country pursuant to section 1151 of 

21 title 18, United States Code. 

22 (e) ADDITIONAL LAND.—Nothing in this Act shall 

23 alter or diminish the right of any federally recognized In24 dian tribe or the authority of the Secretary with respect 

25 to land taken into trust after the date of the enactment 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3137 IH

1 of this Act for the benefit of a federally recognized Indian 

2 tribe. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.2
**Chief Financial Officer’s Certification required under Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**
In connection with the quarterly report of TIB Financial Corp. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),I, David P. Johnson, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifypursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that this Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that, to myknowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and resultsof operation of the Company.        Date: May 10, 2005        /s/ David P. Johnson   David P. Johnson   Executive Vice President and ChiefFinancial Officer   
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other documentauthenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed formwithin the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been providedto TIB Financial Corp. and will be retained by TIB Financial Corp. and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
27
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3243 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify waiver authority 

regarding programs of all-inclusive care for the elderly (PACE programs). 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey (for himself, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. BRADY of 

Texas, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. PASCRELL, Mr. KELLY of 

Pennsylvania, Mr. TONKO, Mr. LANCE, Mr. BILIRAKIS, Mr. BARLETTA, 

Mr. COSTELLO of Pennsylvania, Mr. FITZPATRICK, Ms. MICHELLE

LUJAN GRISHAM of New Mexico, Mr. LOBIONDO, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. 

HIGGINS, Mr. ROTHFUS, Mr. KENNEDY, and Mr. NEAL) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, 

and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period 

to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 

concerned 

A BILL 

To amend title XI of the Social Security Act to clarify 

waiver authority regarding programs of all-inclusive care 

for the elderly (PACE programs). 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3243 IH

1 SECTION 1. CLARIFICATION OF WAIVER AUTHORITY RE2 GARDING PACE PROGRAMS. 

3 Subsection (d)(1) of section 1115A of the Social Se4 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1315a) is amended by striking ‘‘and 

5 1903(m)(2)(A)(iii)’’ and inserting ‘‘1903(m)(2)(A)(iii), 

6 and 1934 (other than subsections (b)(1)(A) and (c)(5) of 

7 such section)’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3138 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3138

To recognize the right of members of the Armed Forces assigned to duty 
  at Armed Forces recruitment offices to carry a personal or service-
                      issue firearm at the office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2015

 Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia introduced the following bill; which was 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To recognize the right of members of the Armed Forces assigned to duty 
  at Armed Forces recruitment offices to carry a personal or service-
                      issue firearm at the office.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Military Recruiter Right to Carry 
Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. RIGHT OF RECRUITERS TO CARRY A FIREARM AT ARMED FORCES 
              RECRUITMENT OFFICES.

    Notwithstanding any Department of Defense policy or Federal, State, 
or local law to the contrary, a member of the Armed Forces assigned to 
duty at an Armed Forces recruitment office has the right to carry a 
personal or service-issue firearm at the office.
                                 <all>
```
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEFFINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTEDPURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, R Steve Creamer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Quarterly Report of Energy*Solutions, Inc.*on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2008 fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Energy*Solutions*, Inc.

 

May 13,2008

 
|   | By:    | /s/ R STEVE CREAMER                                                  |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | R Steve Creamer, Chairman of the Board and Chief   Executive Officer |

 

I, Philip O. Strawbridge, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatthe Annual Report of Energy*Solutions*, Inc.on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008 fully complieswith the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Energy*Solutions*, Inc.

 

May 13,2008

 
|   | By:    | /s/ PHILIP O. STRAWBRIDGE                                                     |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Philip O. Strawbridge, Executive Vice President and   Chief Financial Officer |

 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906has been provided to Energy*Solutions*, Inc.and will be retained by Energy*Solutions*, Inc.and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest.

 

----
IB 

House Calendar No. 54 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2954 

[Report No. 114–247] 

To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut Street in Helena, 

Arkansas, as the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post 

Office, and United States Court House’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 7, 2015 

Mr. CRAWFORD (for himself, Mr. WESTERMAN, Mr. WOMACK, and Mr. HILL) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 

Transportation and Infrastructure 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Additional sponsor: Mr. COHEN

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2954 RH

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 617 Walnut 

Street in Helena, Arkansas, as the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and United 

States Court House’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2954 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JACOB TRIEBER FEDERAL BUILDING, UNITED 

4 STATES POST OFFICE, AND UNITED STATES 

5 COURT HOUSE. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The Federal building located at 

7 617 Walnut Street in Helena, Arkansas, shall be known 

8 and designated as the ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, 

9 United States Post Office, and United States Court 

10 House’’. 

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg12 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

13 States to the Federal building referred to in subsection 

14 (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Jacob 

15 Trieber Federal Building, United States Post Office, and 

16 United States Court House’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 54 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2954 

[Report No. 114–247] 

A BILL 

To designate the Federal building located at 617 

Post Office, and United States Court House’’. ‘‘Jacob Trieber Federal Building, United States Walnut Street in Helena, Arkansas, as the 

SEPTEMBER 8, 2015 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1471/2005

of 9 September 2005         

fixing the additional amount to be paid for pears in Hungary according to Regulation (EC) No 416/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Treaty of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia,

Having regard to Commission Regulation (EC) No 416/2004 of 5 March 2004 laying down transitional measures for the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/96 and Regulation (EC) No 1535/2003 by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union (1), and in particular Article 3(2) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

An additional amount of EUR 40,42 per tonne of pears for processing referred to in Article 3(2) of Regulation (EC) No 416/2004 shall be paid in Hungary after the end of the 2004/05 marketing year.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 9 September 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 68, 6.3.2004, p. 12. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 550/2005 (OJ L 93, 12.4.2005, p. 3).

(2)OJ L 218, 30.8.2003, p. 14. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 180/2005 (OJ L 30, 3.2.2005, p. 7).

----
II 

Calendar No. 675 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3218 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

NOVEMBER 17, 2016 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 1221 State Street, Suite 12, Santa Barbara, 

California, as the ‘‘Special Warfare Operator Master 

Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis ‘Lou’ J. Langlais 

Post Office Building’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SPECIAL WARFARE OPERATOR MASTER CHIEF 

4 PETTY OFFICER (SEAL) LOUIS ‘‘LOU’’ J. 

5 LANGLAIS POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

6 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

7 Postal Service located at 1221 State Street, Suite 12, 


lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3218 RS

1 Santa Barbara, California, shall be known and designated 

2 as the ‘‘Special Warfare Operator Master Chief Petty Offi3 cer (SEAL) Louis ‘Lou’ J. Langlais Post Office Build4 ing’’. 

5 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg6 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

7 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

8 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Special Warfare Oper9 ator Master Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis ‘Lou’ J. 

10 Langlais Post Office Building’’. 


lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 675 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3218 

AN ACT 

Designate the facility of the United States Postal 

Building’’. (SEAL) Louis ‘Lou’ J. Langlais Post Office fare Operator Master Chief Petty Officer Santa Barbara, California, as the ‘‘Special WarService located at 1221 State Street, Suite 12, 

NOVEMBER 17, 2016 

Reported without amendment 


lotter on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS