# Official Journal C 392/29 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 392 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6129 October 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 392

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6129 October 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2018/C 392/01 | Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2018/C 392/01

Last publications of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2018/C 392/02 | Case C-150/18 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2018 by El Corte Inglés SA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 5 December 2017 in Case T-212/16: El Corte Inglés v EUIPO | 2 |
| 2018/C 392/03 | Case C-151/18 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2018 by El Corte Inglés SA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 5 December 2017 in Case T-213/16: El Corte Inglés v EUIPO | 2 |
| 2018/C 392/04 | Case C-246/18 P: Appeal brought on 6 April 2018 by Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2018 in Case T-775/16: Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ v EUIPO | 3 |
| 2018/C 392/05 | Case C-248/18 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2018 by Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2018 in Case T-795/16: Krasnyiy oktyabr v EUIPO | 3 |
| 2018/C 392/06 | Case C-449/18 P: Appeal brought on 6 July 2018 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 26 April 2018 in Case T-554/14 Messi Cuccittini v EUIPO — J.M.-E.V. e hijos | 3 |
| 2018/C 392/07 | Case C-464/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Gerona (Spain) lodged on 17 July 2018 — ZX v Ryanair D.A.C. | 4 |
| 2018/C 392/08 | Case C-474/18 P: Appeal brought on 19 July 2018 by J.M.-E.V. e hijos, S.R.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 26 April 2018 in Case T-554/14 Messi Cuccittini v EUIPO — J.M.-E.V. e hijos | 5 |
| 2018/C 392/09 | Case C-488/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 25 July 2018 — Finanzamt Kaufbeuren mit Außenstelle Füssen v Golfclub Schloss Igling e.V. | 6 |
| 2018/C 392/10 | Case C-511/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 3 August 2018 — La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network, Fédération des fournisseurs d’accès à Internet associatifs, Igwan.net v Premier ministre, Garde des Sceaux, Ministre de la Justice, Ministre de l’Intérieur, Ministre des Armées | 7 |
| 2018/C 392/11 | Case C-512/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 3 August 2018 — French Data Network, La Quadrature du Net, Fédération des fournisseurs d’accès à Internet associatifs v Premier ministre, Garde des Sceaux, Ministre de la Justice | 7 |
| 2018/C 392/12 | Case C-518/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 August 2018 — RD v SC | 8 |
| 2018/C 392/13 | Case C-524/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2018 — Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.KG v Queisser Pharma GmbH & Co. KG | 9 |
| 2018/C 392/14 | Case C-538/18 P: Appeal brought on 16 August 2018 by České dráhy a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 20 June 2018 in Case T-325/16 České dráhy v Commission | 9 |
| 2018/C 392/15 | Case C-539/18 P: Appeal brought on 16 August 2018 by České dráhy a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 20 June 2018 in Case T-621/16 České dráhy v Commission | 11 |
| | General Court |
| 2018/C 392/16 | Case T-715/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 –Rosneft and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence and right to effective judicial protection — Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Russia — Right to property — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Misuse of powers — Legal certainty) | 13 |
| 2018/C 392/17 | Case T-732/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Sberbank of Russia v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity) | 14 |
| 2018/C 392/18 | Case T-734/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — VTB Bank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity) | 15 |
| 2018/C 392/19 | Cases T-735/14 and T-799/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Gazprom Neft v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included and retained on the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Legal basis — Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Russia — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity — Proportionality) | 16 |
| 2018/C 392/20 | Case T-737/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Vnesheconombank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of powers — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business — Equal treatment) | 17 |
| 2018/C 392/21 | Case T-739/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — PSC Prominvestbank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Inclusion of the name of the entity owning the applicant in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of powers — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business — Equal treatment) | 18 |
| 2018/C 392/22 | Case T-798/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — DenizBank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Inclusion of the name of the entity owning the applicant in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — EU-Turkey Association Agreement — Fundamental rights — Proportionality) | 19 |
| 2018/C 392/23 | Case T-68/15: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — HH Ferries and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid in favour of the Øresund road-rail fixed link — Public financing granted by the Swedish State and the Danish State to the Fixed Link infrastructure project across the Øresund — State guarantees — Tax aid — Decision not to raise any objection — Decision that there was no State aid — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Serious difficulties — Concept of ‘aid scheme’ — Aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest — Assessment of the aid element in a guarantee — Whether the aid contained in a guarantee is limited — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations) | 20 |
| 2018/C 392/24 | Case T-515/15: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Almaz-Antey v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Proportionality — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Fundamental rights) | 21 |
| 2018/C 392/25 | Case T-627/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Czech Republic v Commission (EAGF — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic — Decoupled direct aid — Remote-sensing checks — Wine-growing sector — Cross-compliance — Reoccurrence of non-compliance) | 21 |
| 2018/C 392/26 | Case T-702/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Barosso Truta and Others v Court of Justice of the European Union (Appeal — Civil Service — Contractual staff — Pensions — Transfer to the European Union pension scheme of pension rights acquired previously under national schemes — Harm resulting from the allegedly insufficient information provided to the appellants by the AECC when communicating proposals concerning additional pensionable years concerning those appellants — Claim for compensation dismissed at first instance — Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations — Material harm) | 22 |
| 2018/C 392/27 | Case T-61/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — Selimovic v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — European Parliament — Psychological harassment — Decision of the President of the Parliament imposing on a Member of the European Parliament the penalty of a reprimand — Article 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament — Right to good administration — Right of access to the file — Obligation to state reasons — Legal certainty — Misuse of power — Non-contractual liability) | 23 |
| 2018/C 392/28 | Case T-73/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — RS v Commission (Civil service — Temporary agents — Recruitment — Internal competition — Constitution of a reserve list for the recruitment of assistants — Eligibility condition relating to the requirement of 12 months’ continuous employment before the expiry of the deadline for submitting an application — Leave on personal grounds — Non-admission to the tests in a competition) | 24 |
| 2018/C 392/29 | Case T-79/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — Schoonjans v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Recruitment — Internal competition — Constitution of a reserve list for the recruitment of assistants — Eligibility condition relating to the function group to which the candidate belongs on the date of expiry of the deadline for submitting applications — Non-admission to the tests in a competition) | 24 |
| 2018/C 392/30 | Case T-93/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Duferco Long Products v Commission (State aid — Steel sector — Aid granted by Belgium in favour of a number of undertakings in the steel sector — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Duty to state reasons — Notion of State aid — Advantage — Private investor test) | 25 |
| 2018/C 392/31 | Case T-94/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — ACTC v EUIPO — Taiga (tigha) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark tigha — Earlier EU word mark TAIGA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark) | 26 |
| 2018/C 392/32 | Case T-104/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Apple v EUIPO — Apo International (apo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark apo — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an apple and earlier EU word marks APPLE — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 26 |
| 2018/C 392/33 | Case T-184/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Leifheit v EUIPO (Position of four green squares on a scale) (EU trade mark — Application for EU trade mark consisting of four green squares on a scale — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 27 |
| 2018/C 392/34 | Case T-418/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Eduard Meier v EUIPO — Calzaturificio Elisabet (Safari Club) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Safari Club — Earlier national figurative mark WS Walk Safari — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)) | 28 |
| 2018/C 392/35 | Case T-652/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — Eddy’s Snack Company v EUIPO — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli (Eddy’s Snackcompany) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Eddy’s Snackcompany — Earlier national word mark TEDDY — Relative ground for refusal — Principle of ne ultra petita — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) | 28 |
| 2018/C 392/36 | Case T-664/16: Order of the General Court of 30 May 2018 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi) (EU trade mark — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Replacement of a party to the proceedings — Transfer of the rights of the EU trade mark applicant — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant for replacement — Inadmissibility) | 29 |
| 2018/C 392/37 | Case T-750/17: Order of the General Court of 19 July 2018 — Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Request for access to the observations of the Commission and a detailed opinion of a Member State in the context of a notification procedure under Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Refusal to grant access — Disclosure after commencement of the action — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate) | 30 |
| 2018/C 392/38 | Case T-401/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2018 — SFIE-PE v Parliament (Interim measures — Law governing the institutions — Strike action by interpreters — Measures for the requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation — Application for interim measures — Partial inadmissibility — Weighing up of interests) | 31 |
| 2018/C 392/39 | Case T-402/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2018 — Aquino and Others v Parliament (Interim measures — Law governing the institutions — Interpreters’ strike action — Measures of requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — Inadmissible in part — Balance of interests) | 31 |
| 2018/C 392/40 | Case T-507/18: Action brought on 24 August 2018 — France v Commission | 32 |
| 2018/C 392/41 | Case T-520/18: Action brought on 29 August 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGC PARTNERS) | 33 |
| 2018/C 392/42 | Case T-521/18: Action brought on 29 August 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGC BROKERAGE) | 34 |
| 2018/C 392/43 | Case T-522/18: Action brought on 28 August 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (AUREL BGC) | 35 |
| 2018/C 392/44 | Case T-523/18: Action brought on 3 September 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGCPRO) | 36 |
| 2018/C 392/45 | Case T-532/18: Action brought on 10 September 2018 — Aroma Essence v EUIPO — Refan Bulgaria (Washing sponges) | 37 |
| 2018/C 392/46 | Case T-534/18: Action brought on 7 September 2018 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek) | 38 |
| 2018/C 392/47 | Case T-535/18: Action brought on 7 September 2018 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek’s) | 39 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2018/C 392/02

Case C-150/18 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2018 by El Corte Inglés SA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 5 December 2017 in Case T-212/16: El Corte Inglés v EUIPO

2

2018/C 392/03

Case C-151/18 P: Appeal brought on 21 February 2018 by El Corte Inglés SA against the judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) delivered on 5 December 2017 in Case T-213/16: El Corte Inglés v EUIPO

2

2018/C 392/04

Case C-246/18 P: Appeal brought on 6 April 2018 by Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2018 in Case T-775/16: Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ v EUIPO

3

2018/C 392/05

Case C-248/18 P: Appeal brought on 10 April 2018 by Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 7 February 2018 in Case T-795/16: Krasnyiy oktyabr v EUIPO

3

2018/C 392/06

Case C-449/18 P: Appeal brought on 6 July 2018 by the European Union Intellectual Property Office against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 26 April 2018 in Case T-554/14 Messi Cuccittini v EUIPO — J.M.-E.V. e hijos

3

2018/C 392/07

Case C-464/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Mercantil de Gerona (Spain) lodged on 17 July 2018 — ZX v Ryanair D.A.C.

4

2018/C 392/08

Case C-474/18 P: Appeal brought on 19 July 2018 by J.M.-E.V. e hijos, S.R.L. against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 26 April 2018 in Case T-554/14 Messi Cuccittini v EUIPO — J.M.-E.V. e hijos

5

2018/C 392/09

Case C-488/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 25 July 2018 — Finanzamt Kaufbeuren mit Außenstelle Füssen v Golfclub Schloss Igling e.V.

6

2018/C 392/10

Case C-511/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 3 August 2018 — La Quadrature du Net, French Data Network, Fédération des fournisseurs d’accès à Internet associatifs, Igwan.net v Premier ministre, Garde des Sceaux, Ministre de la Justice, Ministre de l’Intérieur, Ministre des Armées

7

2018/C 392/11

Case C-512/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 3 August 2018 — French Data Network, La Quadrature du Net, Fédération des fournisseurs d’accès à Internet associatifs v Premier ministre, Garde des Sceaux, Ministre de la Justice

7

2018/C 392/12

Case C-518/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresní soud v Českých Budějovicích (Czech Republic) lodged on 7 August 2018 — RD v SC

8

2018/C 392/13

Case C-524/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) lodged on 10 August 2018 — Dr. Willmar Schwabe GmbH & Co.KG v Queisser Pharma GmbH & Co. KG

9

2018/C 392/14

Case C-538/18 P: Appeal brought on 16 August 2018 by České dráhy a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 20 June 2018 in Case T-325/16 České dráhy v Commission

9

2018/C 392/15

Case C-539/18 P: Appeal brought on 16 August 2018 by České dráhy a.s. against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 20 June 2018 in Case T-621/16 České dráhy v Commission

11

General Court

2018/C 392/16

Case T-715/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 –Rosneft and Others v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Rights of the defence and right to effective judicial protection — Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Russia — Right to property — Equal treatment — Proportionality — Misuse of powers — Legal certainty)

13

2018/C 392/17

Case T-732/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Sberbank of Russia v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity)

14

2018/C 392/18

Case T-734/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — VTB Bank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included and retained in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Manifest error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity)

15

2018/C 392/19

Cases T-735/14 and T-799/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Gazprom Neft v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included and retained on the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Legal basis — Partnership and Cooperation Agreement between the European Union and Russia — Right to property — Right to carry on an economic activity — Proportionality)

16

2018/C 392/20

Case T-737/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Vnesheconombank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Applicant’s name included in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of powers — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business — Equal treatment)

17

2018/C 392/21

Case T-739/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — PSC Prominvestbank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Inclusion of the name of the entity owning the applicant in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Right to effective judicial protection — Misuse of powers — Right to property — Freedom to conduct a business — Equal treatment)

18

2018/C 392/22

Case T-798/14: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — DenizBank v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Inclusion of the name of the entity owning the applicant in the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of the defence — Right to effective judicial protection — EU-Turkey Association Agreement — Fundamental rights — Proportionality)

19

2018/C 392/23

Case T-68/15: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — HH Ferries and Others v Commission (State aid — Aid in favour of the Øresund road-rail fixed link — Public financing granted by the Swedish State and the Danish State to the Fixed Link infrastructure project across the Øresund — State guarantees — Tax aid — Decision not to raise any objection — Decision that there was no State aid — Action for annulment — Challengeable act — Admissibility — Failure to initiate the formal investigation procedure — Serious difficulties — Concept of ‘aid scheme’ — Aid to promote the execution of an important project of common European interest — Assessment of the aid element in a guarantee — Whether the aid contained in a guarantee is limited — Proportionality — Legitimate expectations)

20

2018/C 392/24

Case T-515/15: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Almaz-Antey v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of Russia’s actions destabilising the situation in Ukraine — Retention of the applicant’s name on the list of entities to which the restrictive measures apply — Proportionality — Error of assessment — Obligation to state reasons — Fundamental rights)

21

2018/C 392/25

Case T-627/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Czech Republic v Commission (EAGF — Expenditure excluded from financing — Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic — Decoupled direct aid — Remote-sensing checks — Wine-growing sector — Cross-compliance — Reoccurrence of non-compliance)

21

2018/C 392/26

Case T-702/16 P: Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Barosso Truta and Others v Court of Justice of the European Union (Appeal — Civil Service — Contractual staff — Pensions — Transfer to the European Union pension scheme of pension rights acquired previously under national schemes — Harm resulting from the allegedly insufficient information provided to the appellants by the AECC when communicating proposals concerning additional pensionable years concerning those appellants — Claim for compensation dismissed at first instance — Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations — Material harm)

22

2018/C 392/27

Case T-61/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — Selimovic v Parliament (Law governing the institutions — European Parliament — Psychological harassment — Decision of the President of the Parliament imposing on a Member of the European Parliament the penalty of a reprimand — Article 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament — Right to good administration — Right of access to the file — Obligation to state reasons — Legal certainty — Misuse of power — Non-contractual liability)

23

2018/C 392/28

Case T-73/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — RS v Commission (Civil service — Temporary agents — Recruitment — Internal competition — Constitution of a reserve list for the recruitment of assistants — Eligibility condition relating to the requirement of 12 months’ continuous employment before the expiry of the deadline for submitting an application — Leave on personal grounds — Non-admission to the tests in a competition)

24

2018/C 392/29

Case T-79/17: Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2018 — Schoonjans v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Recruitment — Internal competition — Constitution of a reserve list for the recruitment of assistants — Eligibility condition relating to the function group to which the candidate belongs on the date of expiry of the deadline for submitting applications — Non-admission to the tests in a competition)

24

2018/C 392/30

Case T-93/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Duferco Long Products v Commission (State aid — Steel sector — Aid granted by Belgium in favour of a number of undertakings in the steel sector — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Duty to state reasons — Notion of State aid — Advantage — Private investor test)

25

2018/C 392/31

Case T-94/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — ACTC v EUIPO — Taiga (tigha) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark tigha — Earlier EU word mark TAIGA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark)

26

2018/C 392/32

Case T-104/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Apple v EUIPO — Apo International (apo) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark apo — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an apple and earlier EU word marks APPLE — Relative grounds for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

26

2018/C 392/33

Case T-184/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Leifheit v EUIPO (Position of four green squares on a scale) (EU trade mark — Application for EU trade mark consisting of four green squares on a scale — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

27

2018/C 392/34

Case T-418/17: Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Eduard Meier v EUIPO — Calzaturificio Elisabet (Safari Club) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark Safari Club — Earlier national figurative mark WS Walk Safari — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

28

2018/C 392/35

Case T-652/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — Eddy’s Snack Company v EUIPO — Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli (Eddy’s Snackcompany) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Eddy’s Snackcompany — Earlier national word mark TEDDY — Relative ground for refusal — Principle of ne ultra petita — Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

28

2018/C 392/36

Case T-664/16: Order of the General Court of 30 May 2018 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi) (EU trade mark — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Replacement of a party to the proceedings — Transfer of the rights of the EU trade mark applicant — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant for replacement — Inadmissibility)

29

2018/C 392/37

Case T-750/17: Order of the General Court of 19 July 2018 — Izba Gospodarcza Producentów i Operatorów Urządzeń Rozrywkowych v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Request for access to the observations of the Commission and a detailed opinion of a Member State in the context of a notification procedure under Directive (EU) 2015/1535 — Refusal to grant access — Disclosure after commencement of the action — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

30

2018/C 392/38

Case T-401/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2018 — SFIE-PE v Parliament (Interim measures — Law governing the institutions — Strike action by interpreters — Measures for the requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation — Application for interim measures — Partial inadmissibility — Weighing up of interests)

31

2018/C 392/39

Case T-402/18 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 4 July 2018 — Aquino and Others v Parliament (Interim measures — Law governing the institutions — Interpreters’ strike action — Measures of requisition of interpreters adopted by the European Parliament — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — Application for interim measures — Inadmissible in part — Balance of interests)

31

2018/C 392/40

Case T-507/18: Action brought on 24 August 2018 — France v Commission

32

2018/C 392/41

Case T-520/18: Action brought on 29 August 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGC PARTNERS)

33

2018/C 392/42

Case T-521/18: Action brought on 29 August 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGC BROKERAGE)

34

2018/C 392/43

Case T-522/18: Action brought on 28 August 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (AUREL BGC)

35

2018/C 392/44

Case T-523/18: Action brought on 3 September 2018 — BGC Partners v EUIPO — Bankgirocentralen BGC (BGCPRO)

36

2018/C 392/45

Case T-532/18: Action brought on 10 September 2018 — Aroma Essence v EUIPO — Refan Bulgaria (Washing sponges)

37

2018/C 392/46

Case T-534/18: Action brought on 7 September 2018 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek)

38

2018/C 392/47

Case T-535/18: Action brought on 7 September 2018 — Peek & Cloppenburg v EUIPO — Peek & Cloppenburg (Peek’s)

39

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN