alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      31.1




CERTIFICATION




I,
      Edward
      B. Kornfeld, certify that:




1. I
      have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Porta Systems Corp.;




2. Based
      on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact
      or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
      light
      of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with
      respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
      on my
      knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in
      this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;




4. I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
      registrant and I have:




a) designed
      such
      disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
      procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the
      period in which this report is being prepared;




b) evaluated
      the
      effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this
      report based on such evaluation; and




c) disclosed
      in
      this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. I
      have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant’s board of directors:




a) all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b) any
      fraud,
      whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
      a
      significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.


By:
          /s/
          Edward B. Kornfeld


Edward
      B.
      Kornfeld


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer




March
        29,
        2007
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22403]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


Department of Veterans Affairs Voluntary Service National 
Advisory Committee, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. ch. 10, that the Executive 
Committee of the VA Voluntary Service (VAVS) National Advisory 
Committee (NAC) will meet October 24-25, 2024 at the Disabled American 
Veterans Washington Headquarters located at 1300 I Street NW, Suite 400 
West, Washington, DC 20005. The meeting sessions will begin and end as 
follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Meeting date(s):                     Meeting time(s):
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thursday, October 24, 2024........  9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern
                                     Standard Time (EST).
Friday, October 25, 2024..........  9:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. EST.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The meeting sessions are open to the public.
    The Executive Committee, a working group of the VAVS NAC, comprised 
of 20 major Veteran, civic, and service organizations, advises the 
Secretary, through the Under Secretary for Health, on the coordination 
and promotion of volunteer activities and strategic partnerships within 
VA health care facilities, in the community, and on matters related to 
volunteerism and charitable giving.
    Agenda topics will include the NAC goals and objectives; review of 
minutes from the May 14-16, 2024 meeting; briefings from VA Chief of 
Staff, VA Advisory Committee Management Office, and VA Center for 
Development and Civic Engagement (CDCE); subcommittee reports; review 
of standard operating procedures; assessment of member organization 
data; innovation for optimal access to care; cross committee 
collaboration among Federal advisory committees; extending programming 
into communities; and any new business.
    The public may submit written statements for the Committee's review 
to Sabrina C. Clark, Ph.D., Designated Federal Officer, VA Center for 
Development and Civic Engagement (15CDCE), Department of Veterans 
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420, or email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#386b595a4a515659167b54594a53784e59165f574e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="04576566766d6a652a476865766f4472652a636b72">[email protected]</span></a>. Any member of the public wishing to attend the 
meeting or seeking additional information should contact Dr. Clark at 
202-536-8603.

    Dated: September 25, 2024.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-22403 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2018058EN.01000101.xml

| 15.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 58/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 58/1

---

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

2016–2017 SESSION

Sittings of 11 to 14 April 2016

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 181, 8.6.2017.

The Minutes of this session have been published in OJ C 181, 8.6.2017.

TEXTS ADOPTED

---
AAM

- 13

- 047

- E January 11, 2013

Exemption No. 10220B

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2011

- 0170

Mr. Lawrence Ihle

Coastal Helicopters, LLC

P.O. Box 715

Nags Head, NC 27959

Dear Mr. Ihle :

This lett er is to inform you that we have grant ed your petition to ext end Exemption

No. 10220 , as amended . It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect , and lists

the conditions and limitations

.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated October 22 , 2012 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

on behalf of Coastal Helicopters, LLC (Coastal) for an extension of Exemption No. 10220 , as

amended . That exemption from part 120 of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)

allows Coastal, which is operating under separate parts of the regulations, to cover its safety

sensitive employees under one testing program.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to p ublic interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register beca use the requested amendment to the exemption would no t set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be det rimental to Coastal

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 10220, as

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and i s in the public interest. Therefore,

under the authority provide d by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator2

has delegat ed to me, I grant your petition, subject to the conditions and limitations listed

below.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Emp loyees of Coastal and OBX Biplanes are subject to the drug and alcohol

regulations at all times while conducting operations under part 135 or part 91.

2. The drug and alcohol testing program must be implemented under the auspices of the

Coastal part 135 oper ation, not under part 91.

The Effect of Our Decision

T he termina tion date of Exemption No. 10220, as amended, is extended to March 31, 201 5

, unless sooner su perseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

James R. Fraser

Deputy Federal Air Surgeon
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In  connection  with this  Quarterly  Report of Mainland  Resources,  Inc.  (the
"Company")on  Form 10-Q for the quarter ending  November 30, 2008, as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Michael J. Newport,  President/Chief  Executive Officer,  and William D. Thomas,
Treasurer/Chief  Financial Officer,  of the Company,  certify to the best of our
knowledge,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Date: January 09, 2009

                                          /s/ MICHAEL J. NEWPORT
                                          _____________________________________
                                              Michael J. Newport
                                              President/Chief Executive Officer



Date: January 09, 2009

                                          /s/ WILLIAM D. THOMAS
                                          ______________________________________
                                              William D. Thomas
                                              Treasurer/ Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016191EN.01005301.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/53

---

Action brought on 23 March 2016 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-17/16)

(2016/C 191/77)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Action for annulment of the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to have regard to the late request for review of the decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 and for annulment of the implied decision not to grant that request for review.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 17 August 2015, received by the applicant by e-mail, not to have regard to the applicant’s request of 13 August 2015 for review of the decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 following the decision of the selection board in that competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 17 August 2015, received by the applicant by e-mail, not to have regard to the applicant’s request of 13 August 2015 for review of the decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 following the decision of the selection board in that competition;

| — | annul the implied decision of the selection board in open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 not to grant the applicant’s request of 13 August 2015 for review of the decision of the selection board not to admit the applicant to the next stage of that competition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the implied decision of the selection board in open competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 — 3 not to grant the applicant’s request of 13 August 2015 for review of the decision of the selection board not to admit the applicant to the next stage of that competition;

| — | order the Commission to pay the entire costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the entire costs.

---
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 03464

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 03464\03464_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

03464\03464_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

03464\03464_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 03464\03464_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03464\03464_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03464\03464_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03464\03464_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 03464\03464_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

03464\Certification Statement_03464.pdf Plant certification statement

x 03464\Supporting Documentation\03464_WAPdiagramspartAsec5qA5-3.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 03464\Supporting Documentation\WAPdiagramspartDsec3.1qD3-1.ppt Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00010-CV

Christopher Rogers, Appellant

v.

Amy Rogers, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 126TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. D-1-FM-11-001785, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The clerk’s record in this appeal was due in this Court on January 29, 2013. On,

June 7, 2013, Christopher Rogers was notified that no clerk’s record had been filed due to his failure

to pay or make arrangements to pay the district clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The

notice requested that Rogers make arrangements for the clerk’s record and submit a status report

regarding this appeal by June 17, 2013. Rogers has not filed a status report or otherwise responded

to this Court’s notice.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk’s record due to appellant’s failure to pay

or make arrangements to pay the clerk’s fee for preparing the record, the appellate court may dismiss

the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment

of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Because Rogers has failed to pay or make arrangements to pay

the clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record, this appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
__________________________________________

Bob Pemberton, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Pemberton and Field

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 16, 2013

2
7ermont Superior Court Filed_08/23/24

Essex nit

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT

Essex Unit 75 Courthouse Drive Guildhall VT 05905 802-676-3910 www.vermontjudiciary.org

CIVIL DIVISION

Case No. 23-CV-02532

ames Gibbons, r. v. State ofVermont ENTRY REGARDING MOTION

Title: Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Motion: 3) Filer: Patrick T. Gaudet Filed Date: July 18, 2024

The motion is GRANTED.

Plainuff has clarified in his motion practicethat he seeks to hold appointed members of the

Vermont

Judiciary

liable for the time that he has spentincarcerated based on procedural failures of

the Vermont Superior Court system. As the State notes in its opposition, Plaintiff's claim is based

on conduct that is protected by judicial

immunity. LaPlaca v. Lowery, 134 Vt. 56,57 58 (1975); see

also O'Connor v. Donovan, 2012 VT 27,1 6. This immunity extends from judgesto clerks and court

staff in the performance of their judicial functions. Rodriguezv. Weprin, 116 F.3d 62, 66 (2d Cir.

1997). It also extends to the State of Vermont. Cxechorowski v. State, 2005 VT 40, 29.

The nature of immunity is that the right of partyto bringclaim is barred, and there is no

discovery or analysis as to the quality or evidence supporting

the claim. O'Connor, 2012 VT 27, at

29. Claims of immunityshould be resolved at the out and are review bythe Court as matter of

law. Id. ORDER

Based on the foregoing, Plaintiff Gibbons' claims are Dismissed as matter of law under

the doctrine of judicial immunity.

Electronically signed on 8/22/2024 6:29 PM pursuant to V.R.E.F. 9(d)

Daniel Richardson

Superior Court Judge

Entry Regarding Motion Page of 23-CV-02532 James Gibbons, Jr. v. State of Vermont
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 97-702 Date: June 17, 1997 

Subject: Announcement of the new Benefits Administration Letter (BAL)

format.

Background: We have modified the Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) format to

facilitate our transmission of files electronically. The previous format

used graphics which added to the amount of time needed for

downloading BALs from various electronic platforms. The new BAL

format provides the same guidance with a smaller file size to facilitate

electronic transmission.

Future Future BALs will be available both on the Internet Home page and the

Plans: Bulletin Board Service (BBS--now known as Mainstreet but soon to be

known as OPM Online). The Internet Home page may be reached at the

internet Uniform Resource Locator (URL) http://WWW.OPM.GOV. 

The BBS may be reached via modem at 202-606-4800.

Internet Agencies interested in receiving BALs by internet email should send a

Mail: request to ASD@OPM.GOV.

Mary M. Sugar, Chief

Agency Services Division
**Exhibit 10.7****AMENDMENT TO CONFIRMATION**     THIS AMENDMENT TO CONFIRMATION (this “Amendment”) is made as of this 29th day of June 2007,between Parker Drilling Company (“Issuer”) and Bank of America, N.A. (“BofA”).     WHEREAS, BofA and Issuer are parties to a Confirmation dated as of June 28, 2007 (the“Confirmation”) relating to Warrants on shares of Issuer;     WHEREAS, the parties wish to amend the Confirmation on the terms and conditions set forth inthis Amendment;     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual covenants herein contained and for other goodand valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, theparties hereto hereby agree as follows:     Section 1. Terms Used but Not Defined Herein. Capitalized terms used but not defined hereinshall have the respective meanings given to them in the Confirmation.     Section 2. Amendments to the Confirmation. The Confirmation is, effective as of the datehereof, hereby amended as follows:(a) The “Premium” under the Confirmation shall be USD $12,150,000.00. For the avoidanceof doubt, the Premium per Warrant set forth in the Confirmation shall remain unchanged.(b) The “Number of Warrants” under Annex A of the Confirmation shall be 60,184 for Components 1through 89 and 60,252 for Component 90.     Section 3. Representations and Warranties. Issuer represents and warrants to BofA thatthe representations and warranties of Issuer set forth in Section 3 of the Agreement and Section 7of the Confirmation are true and correct and are hereby deemed to be repeated to BofA as if setforth herein.     Section 4. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective upon execution by theparties hereto.     Section 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each ofwhich shall be an original, with the same effect as if all of the signatures thereto and heretowere upon the same instrument.     Section 6. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordancewith the laws of the State of New York.     Section 7. Effectiveness of Confirmation. Except as amended hereby, all the terms of theConfirmation shall remain and continue in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed in allrespects.
1

 
**Exhibit 10.7**     Issuer hereby agrees (a) to check this Amendment carefully and immediately upon receipt sothat errors or discrepancies can be promptly identified and rectified and (b) to confirm that theforegoing (in the exact form provided by BofA) correctly sets forth the terms of the agreementbetween BofA and Issuer with respect to the Transaction, by manually signing this Amendment or thispage hereof as evidence of agreement to such terms and providing the other information requestedherein and immediately returning an executed copy to John Servidio, Facsimile No. 212-230-8610.      Yours faithfully,
# Official Journal C 151I/2019

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 151I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 623 May 2019 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 151I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 623 May 2019

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | OTHER ACTS |
| | European Commission |
| 2019/C 151 I/01 | Notice for the attention of MOHAMMED MASOOD AZHAR ALVI whose name was added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations, by virtue of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/696 | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

OTHER ACTS

European Commission

2019/C 151 I/01

Notice for the attention of MOHAMMED MASOOD AZHAR ALVI whose name was added to the list referred to in Articles 2, 3 and 7 of Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the ISIL (Da'esh) and Al-Qaida organisations, by virtue of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/696

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Order entered June 8, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00174-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.B.P., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 255th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-17269

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this appeal is past due. By postcard dated April 6, 

2022, we notified Latoya Young, Official Court Reporter for the 255th Judicial 

District Court, that the reporter’s record was overdue and directed her to file the 

reporter’s record within thirty days. To date, Ms. Young has failed to comply 

with the Court’s order. 

Accordingly, we ORDER LaToya Young to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS

of the date of this order, either (1) the reporter’s record; (2) written verification no 

hearings were recorded; or (3) written verification that appellant has not paid for or 

made arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and has not been found entitled 
to proceed without payment of costs. We notify appellant that if we receive 

verification he has not requested the reporter’s record or paid for or made

arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record and is not entitled to proceed 

without payment of costs, we will order the appeal submitted without the reporter’s 

record. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c). 

We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order to:

Honorable Kim Cooks

Presiding Judge

255th Judicial District Court 

LaToya Young

Official Court Reporter

255th Judicial District Court

All parties

/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE