alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-10344 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JOHN JOSEPH MIOTKE, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:97-CR-119-1

- - - - - - - - - - December 9, 1998
Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * John Joseph Miotke appeals the district court’s application of U.S.S.G. § 2B5.1(b)(2), to enhance his base offense level. Miotke contends that the enhancement does not apply to his case because he produced the counterfeit currency by photocopying, and Application Note 4 to § 2B5.1(b)(2), by its plain language, precludes application of the enhancement to persons who merely photocopy notes. Alternatively, Miotke contends that theNo. 98-10344 -2- commentary to the Sentencing Guideline is ambiguous and should be interpreted in his favor. We review “the district court’s application of the Sentencing Guidelines de novo and its findings for clear error.” United States v. Wyjack , 141 F.3d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1998) (citation omitted). Miotke’s argument is foreclosed by the interpretation of § 2B5.1(b)(2) and Application Note 4 advanced in Wyjack , 141 F.3d at 183. There, we concluded that “the enhancement contemplated by § 2B5.1(b)(2) applies to counterfeiters who produce instruments by photocopying, unless the instruments produced are so obviously counterfeit that they are unlikely to be accepted after only minimal scrutiny.” Id. The district court’s determination on the quality of counterfeit notes, made by examination or based on witness’ testimony, in determining whether to apply the § 2B5.1(b)(2) enhancement, is a factual finding, which is subject to the clearly erroneous standard of review. United States v. Bollman , 141 F.3d 184, 186-87 (5th Cir. 1998). A finding is not clearly erroneous “as long as the determination is plausible in light of the record as a whole.” United States v. Ismoila , 100 F.3d 380, 396 (5th Cir. 1996)(citation omitted), cert. denied , 117 S. Ct. 1712, 1858 (1997). The district court determined by examination and based on credible testimony that the counterfeit instruments produced by Miotke were not so obviously counterfeit that they were unlikely to be accepted after only minimal scrutiny. Miotke has not shownNo. 98-10344 -3- that the district court’s finding was clearly erroneous. Accordingly, Miotke’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  /s/ John R. Sult

John R. Sult
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
and Controller
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Southern Natural Gas CompanyFebruary 28, 2007
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3095 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for an exclusion 

for assistance provided to participants in certain veterinary student loan 

repayment or forgiveness programs. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Nebraska (for himself, Mr. KIND, Mr. THOMPSON of California, 

Mr. SCHRADER, and Mr. YOUNG of Iowa) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide 

for an exclusion for assistance provided to participants 

in certain veterinary student loan repayment or forgiveness programs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterinary Medicine 

5 Loan Repayment Program Enhancement Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3095 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION FOR ASSISTANCE PROVIDED TO PAR2 TICIPANTS IN CERTAIN VETERINARY STU3 DENT LOAN REPAYMENT OR FORGIVENESS 

4 PROGRAMS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Paragraph (4) of section 108(f) 

6 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

7 (1) by striking ‘‘or’’ after ‘‘such Act,’’, 

8 (2) by striking the period at the end and insert9 ing ‘‘, under section 1415A of the National Agricul10 tural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act 

11 of 1977 (7 U.S.C. 3151a), or under any other State 

12 loan repayment or loan forgiveness program that is 

13 intended to provide for increased access to veteri14 nary services in such State.’’, and 

15 (3) by striking ‘‘STATE’’ in the heading and in16 serting ‘‘OTHER’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section shall apply to amounts received by an indi19 vidual in taxable years beginning after December 31, 

20 2015. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
# Official Journal C 15/20 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 15 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4920 January 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 15

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4920 January 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 015/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 015/2 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4088 — GIB/Groupe Flo) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 015/3 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4054 — Koch Industries/Georgia-Pacific) (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 015/4 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3928 — Teva/Ivax) (1) | 3 |
| 2006/C 015/5 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4053 — Morgan Stanley/AM Development) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 015/6 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4037 — Gerdau/Grupo Santander/Bogey/Sidenor) (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 015/7 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4052 — BAM/AM) (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 015/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 015/2

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4088 — GIB/Groupe Flo) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

2

2006/C 015/3

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4054 — Koch Industries/Georgia-Pacific) (1)

3

2006/C 015/4

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.3928 — Teva/Ivax) (1)

3

2006/C 015/5

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4053 — Morgan Stanley/AM Development) (1)

4

2006/C 015/6

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4037 — Gerdau/Grupo Santander/Bogey/Sidenor) (1)

4

2006/C 015/7

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4052 — BAM/AM) (1)

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### Ed BOWMAN v. STATE.

No. 20907.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 3, 1940.

*1059T. R. Odell, of Haskell, and M. F. Bill-ingsley, of Munday, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public road while appellant was intoxicated, punishment being assessed at a fine of fifty dollars and five days’ confinement in the county jail.

Appellant has filed his affidavit advising the court that he does not desire to further prosecute his appeal, and at his request the same is ordered dismissed.
# Official Journal C 3/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 3 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 665 January 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 3

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 665 January 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 3/01 | Euro exchange rates – 4 January 2023 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 3/01

Euro exchange rates – 4 January 2023

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 3/02 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10985 – BMHC / ALD / JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2023/C 3/02

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10985 – BMHC / ALD / JV) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22654]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 364 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-715, K2024-8.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22654 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
## MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT 1800 Washington Boulevard eBaltimore MD 21230 410-53 7-3000 e 1-800-633-6101 

# MDE Martin O 'Malley Shari T. Wil son Governor Secretary Robert M. Summers , Ph .D. Anthony G . Brown Deputy Secretar y Lieutenant Governor 

# APR 18 2008 Mr. Donald Welsh Regional Administrator 

### (3RAOO) U.S . Environmental Protection Agency Region III 1650 Arch Street Philadelphia PA 19103-2029 Dear Mr. Welsh : The purpose ofthis letter is to submit copies of State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision 

### # 08-02 concerning the establ ishment of emissions limits for adhesive application and manufacturing operations under COMAR 26.11.19.30 and volatile organic compounds (VOC) standards for over 40 categories of adhesives , sealants , adhesive primers, sealant primers and cleaning solvents under new chapter COMAR 26 .11 .35 . This SIP Revision includes amendments to Regulation .30 under COMAR 26 .11 .19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes and new Regulations .01 - .07 under a new chapter, COMAR 26.11.35 Control of Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds from Adhesives and Sealants . The Notice of Proposed Action for the amendments and new regulations was published in the Maryland Register on December 21, 200 7. The amendments and new regulations were granted emergency status by the Joint Committee on Administrative , Executive, and Legislative Review of the General Assembly and made effective as ofJanuary 11,2008. The Emergency Action was published in the Malyland Register on February 1 ,2008. A public hearing was held on the Proposed Action on January 23 , 2008. The amendments and new regulations were adopted on March 17,2008 and will become permanently effective on April 21 ,2008. All administrative procedures were properly followed throughout the adoption process . If you have any questions concerning this SIP submittal , please feel free to call me at (410) 53 7-3084 or have a member of your staff call Mr. George (Tad) S . Aburn, Jr., Director, Air and Radiation Management Administration , at (410) 53 7-3255.

Shari T . Wilson Secretary STW:dhr Enclosures cc: Judith Katz George (Tad) S . Aburn, Jr.

Rec ycle d Pap er W\\'\\' .rude . state .md .us TTY Users 1-800-735-2258 Via Mar yland Rela y Service
Exhibit 31

SEMT 2012-3

EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.

I, Christopher J. Abate, certify that:

1.    I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-3 (the
Exchange Act periodic reports);

2.    Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as
a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;

3.    Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information
required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4.    Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation
AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5.    All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related
attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules
13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in
such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above,
I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Corelogic Tax Services, LLC, Assurant, Inc., Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Master Servicer, and Citibank, N.A. as Securities Administrator and Paying Agent.



|                                                             
|-------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: March 30, 2018                                         
|                                                             
|/s/ Christopher J. Abate                                     
|Signature                                                    
|                                                             
|Chairman of the Board and President                          
|(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
#### PITTS v. STATE.

No. 19968.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1938.

Phillips & Williamson, of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the. State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of property over the value of fifty dollars, and sentenced to confinement in the State penitentiary for a term of four years.

We find in the transcript and supplemental transcript certain bills of exception which do not show to have been filed in the court below. We also find no order of the court granting any extension of the *996time allowed by statute for the filing thereof. The term of court not extending beyond eight weeks, the bills of exception were not signed and approved by the trial judge until fifty-six days after the adjournment of the court, and therefore are not entitled to be considered by this court. However, there is one bill of exceptions to the remarks of the prosecuting attorney which seems to be properly and seasonably filed, but contains three separate and distinct transactions, or sets of remarks, and is multifarious. Should same be considered, it is incomplete and impresses us as being merely the notes taken, down by the appellant’s attorney as to the objectionable remarks with an annotation thereon by the trial judge' that an exception thereto had been taken. From what appears in this bill we can see no error reflected.

The indictment appears to be in regular and proper form to charge the offense complained of, and the facts are sufficient upon which to predicate the jury’s verdict.

The judgment herein recites that appellant shall be confined in the State penitentiary for a term of four years; it is hereby reformed to read not less than two nor more than four years in conformity with the indeterminate sentence law, and, as thus reformed, the judgment will be affirmed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of the United States Trade Representative

          - [Docket Number USTR-2024-0011]

# AGENCY:

Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).

# ACTION:

Notice; cancellation of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The interagency Trade Policy Staff Committee (TPSC) sought public comments to assist USTR in the preparation of its annual report to Congress on Russia's compliance with its obligations as a Member of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Because USTR received no requests to testify, USTR is canceling the public hearing that was scheduled to take place on October 10, 2024.

# DATES:

The public hearing scheduled for October 10, 2024 is cancelled.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Silvia Savich, Deputy Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Russia and Eurasia at                         *Silvia.Savich@ustr.eop.gov*                         or 202.395.2256.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    On August 5, 2024, the TPSC sought public comments to assist USTR in the preparation of its annual report to Congress on Russia's compliance with its obligations as a Member of the WTO.                     *See*89 FR 63463 (Aug 5, 2024). The notice included a September 18, 2024 deadline for the submission of written comments and requests to testify at a public hearing that was scheduled to take place on October 10, 2024. In response to the notice, USTR received two submissions and no requests to testify. Therefore, USTR is canceling the October 10, 2024 public hearing.                

Laura Buffo,

Chair of the Trade Policy Staff Committee, Office of the United States Trade Representative.

[FR Doc. 2024-22165 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3390-F4-P
Federal Retirement Moving Checklist 



 Moving? Use this tool to help you prepare for 

 moving and then conduct any relevant 

 transactions after your move. 

 - 

 

-

 





Prior to Moving...

Banking: Do I need to change my financial institution?

 Visit BENEFEDS to determine if my Dental and Vision plans 

 will need to change and compare plans 

For additional information about the Federal Employees’

Health Benefits Program (FEHB), the Federal Employees’

Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP), the Federal 

Employees’ Group Life Insurance Program (FEGLI) and the 

Federal Long Term Care Insurance Program (FLTCIP), read the 

Guide to Federal Benefits For Federal Retirees and Their 

Survivors

Health Benefits: Does my current health benefit plan serve my 

future geographic location? 

- Find my health benefit plan information here 

- Compare health benefit plans for your new area here 

State Tax: If I am moving to a new state, does my new state 

participate in the voluntary withholding program? Find out here
 After Moving...

Use Retirement Services Online to conduct the following transactions: 

 Change of Mailing Address

 Change Direct Deposit Information (if I changed my financial 

institution and/or my checking/savings account) 

 Change State Tax Withholding (if moving to a state that 

participates in the voluntary withholding plan and to discontinue 

your prior state tax deduction, if applicable) 

 Change Email Address (if applicable) 

___________________________________________________________________

 If I need to change my health benefit plan, email 

retire@opm.gov with the following information: 

 CSA Number 

 Statement that I have moved outside my current health 

benefit plan’s area 

 Name of new health benefit plan 

 Three-digit enrollment code of my new health benefit plan 

If I need to change my dental and/or vision plans, visit 

BENEFEDS. 

