alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit32.1

| (1)   | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities     Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                   |   |                                                                     |
|------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   |   |                                                                     |   |
| November      14, 2008 | By:    | /s/       Steven Y.      Moskowitz                   |   |
|                   |   | Steven      Y. Moskowitz                                                 |   |
|                   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |   |
|                   |   |                                                                     |   |
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Cavalier Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leo
      Mentzelopoulos, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my
      knowledge:




(1)
      the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)
      the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
                May 14, 2008
            /s/
                Leo MentzelopoulosLeo
                MentzelopoulosPresident(Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer)




This
      certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-QSB pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the
      extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by
      reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
      the
      Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates
      it
      by reference.
#### STEWART v. STATE.

No. 20400.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1939.

*904Jimmie Cunningham, of Graham, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, a fine of $100 and • confinement in jail for 60 days.

 The court declined to approve appellant’s hill of exception No. 1, with the statement, over the court’s signature, that the bill was refused. No reason was stated for the court’s action. Also, in connection with the refusal, it is shown that the court ordered the bill filed. The procedure to be followed by the trial judge when the bill of exception is prepared and presented to him within the time allowed by law for filing it is provided by statute. Where a bill is prepared by the appellant and presented to the trial judge in time, it is his duty, if he does not agree with the correctness of the bill, to file with it a bill which presents the true record. This affords the appellant the opportunity to prepare and file a bystanders’ bill. When the trial judge fails to adopt such procedure and orders a bill filed which is marked "refused,” the appellant is entitled to either have the bill considered or have a reversal because it is denied him. It has been the practice of this court under such circumstances to consider the bill. See Rosa v. State, 86 Tex.Cr.R. 646, 218 S.W. 1056, and authorities cited, and Blackshear v. State, 123 Tex.Cr.R. Ill, 58 S.W.2d 105.

Considering the bill of exception, it appears therefrom that appellant was not present 'in court when the case against her was tried; and, further, that she was absent during all of the proceedings. Art. 580, C.C.P., reads in part, as follows: “In all prosecutions for felonies, the defendant must be personally present at the trial, and he must likewise be present in all cases of misdemeanor when the punishment or any part thereof is imprisonment in jail.” Under this article it was error for the court, in the absence of the appellant, to try the case against her, as part of the punishment was imprisonment in jail. See Flossie Henderson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 127 S.W.2d 902, this day delivered.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
* Judge Ervin was assigned to the panel in this case but died prior to the time the decision was filed. The decision is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(d). UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-1662

LAMARR BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMAN ASSOCIATION, Local 1248, AFL-CIO, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CA-98-1389) Submitted: August 24, 1999 Decided: October 15, 1999 Before ERVIN* and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lamarr Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Charles S. Montagna, MONTAGNA, KLEIN & CAMDEN, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.* Although the district court’s judgment is marked as “filed” on April 15, 1999, the district court’s records show that it was entered on the docket sheet on April 16, 1999. Pursuant to Rules 58 and 79(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, it is the date that the judgment was entered on the docket sheet that we take as the effective date of the district court’s decision. See Wilson v. Murray , 806 F.2d 1232, 1234-35 (4th Cir. 1986). 2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:Lamarr Brown appeals the district court judgment granting summary judgment to the Appellee and dismissing his complaint alleging that his union local engaged in unfair labor practices under 29 U.S.C. § 158 (1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court dismissal order and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Brown v. International Longshoreman Ass’n Local 1248 , No. CA-98-1389 (E.D. Va. Apr. 16, 1999). * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# Official Journal L 227/2013

| | ISSN 1977-0677
  doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.227.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 227 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5624 August 2013 |

ISSN 1977-0677

doi:10.3000/19770677.L_2013.227.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 227

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5624 August 2013

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 800/2013 of 14 August 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 800/2013 of 14 August 2013 amending Regulation (EU) No 965/2012 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to air operations pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (1)

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22630]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 353 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-696, CP2024-705.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22630 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# Official Journal L 232/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 232 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 584 September 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 232

English edition

Legislation

Volume 584 September 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1469 of 23 July 2014 on State aid SA.30743 (2012/C) (ex N 138/10) — Germany — Financing of infrastructure projects at Leipzig/Halle airport (2)
  (notified under document C(2014) 5071)

   (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1470 of 30 March 2015 on State aid SA.38517 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Romania — Arbitral award Micula v Romania of 11 December 2013
  (notified under document C(2015) 2112)

   (
  1
  ) | 43 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1469 of 23 July 2014 on State aid SA.30743 (2012/C) (ex N 138/10) — Germany — Financing of infrastructure projects at Leipzig/Halle airport (2)
  (notified under document C(2014) 5071)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2014) 5071)

1

1

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2015/1470 of 30 March 2015 on State aid SA.38517 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) implemented by Romania — Arbitral award Micula v Romania of 11 December 2013
  (notified under document C(2015) 2112)

   (
  1
  )

(notified under document C(2015) 2112)

1

43

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunrise Holdings Limited (the "Company") for
the quarter ended March 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Holdings
Limited.







Date:
      April 29, 2009
            
            
            /s/
      Shaojun SunShaojun Sun, Chief Financial
Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned is the CEO and Presidentof Petrocorp Inc.  This Certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.  This Certification accompanies the QuarterlyReport on Form 10-Q of Petrocorp Inc. for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.

 

The undersigned certifies that such 10-QReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such 10-QReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of Petrocorp Inc. as of June 30, 2010.

 

This Certification is executed as ofAugust 20, 2010.

* *

/s/ James Fitzsimons    

     James Fitzsimons

     CEO and President
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-2651
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus UNITED STATES FED ERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE; MAYOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND; COMMISSIONERBALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARYLAND; COMMISSIONER HOWARD COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARYLAND; FIRE CHIEF HOWARD COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT, MARYLAND; DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; PRESTIGE MOTORS, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND; COUNTY EXECUTIVE, HOWARD COUNTY, MARYLAND, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District ofMaryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA97-3747-S) Submitted: January 22, 1998 Decided: February 3, 1998 Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.2 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. United States Federal Protective Serv. , No. CA-97-3747-S (D. Md. Nov. 21, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, each of the undersigned, Lawrence J. LeBon, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John LeBlanc, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |     |  |                                                  
|------------------ |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence J. LeBon, III                       
|                   |  |     |  | Lawrence J. LeBon, III                           
|                   |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                   |  |    
|Date: May 13, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ John LeBlanc                                 
|                   |  |     |  | John LeBlanc                                     
|                   |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
| **CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Parenthetical) (USD $)** | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                     |           |           |   |   |
| Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in dollars per share)                                | $ 0.08         | $ 0.05         | $ 0.13 | $ 0.08 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 04 -Article 3Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
PART IV: ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND EXHIBITS





EXHIBIT-23


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-50484, 333-80117 and 333-159643) and Form S-3 (File Nos. 033-45393 and 333-158334) of First Merchants Corporation (Corporation) of our reports dated February 29, 2016 on our audits of the consolidated financial statements of the Corporation as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, which report is included in this Annual Report in Form 10-K.  We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated February 29, 2016, on our audit of the internal control over financial reporting of the Corporation as of December 31, 2015, which report is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.





BKD, LLP


Indianapolis, Indiana


February 29, 2016