alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-31 Rule13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.

 

 

I, Kunal K. Singh,certify that:

 

1. I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed inrespect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the J.P. MorganChase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012‐CIBX (the "ExchangeAct periodic reports");

 

2. Based on myknowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required tobe provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is includedin the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on myknowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report underItem 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Actperiodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under theservicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reportson assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securitiesand their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance withservicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in thisreport in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwisedisclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described insuch reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving thecertifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me bythe following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank,National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division ofPNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank NationalAssociation, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as CertificateAdministrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, TriMontReal Estate Advisors, Inc., as Senior Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real EstateServices, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, asServicing Function Participant, and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNCBank, National Association, as Primary Servicer.

 

 

 

Dated: March 21, 2019

 

 

/s/ Kunal K. Singh

 

 

President and ChiefExecutive Officer

(seniorofficer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory J. Rizzo, President and Chief
Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                             
|---------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    GREGORY J.
RIZZO                                                                                                                                                                     
|                       |  |  |  | Gregory J. Rizzo President and Chief Executive Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 315 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 315

To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process to determine 
whether individuals claiming certain service in the Philippines during 
World War II are eligible for certain benefits despite not being on the 
                 Missouri List, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2015

     Ms. Meng (for herself, Mr. Honda, Mr. Lowenthal, Mr. Brady of 
  Pennsylvania, Mr. Rangel, Ms. Bordallo, Mr. Takano, and Mr. Peters) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
Veterans' Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed Services, 
for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 
for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of 
                        the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of Defense to establish a process to determine 
whether individuals claiming certain service in the Philippines during 
World War II are eligible for certain benefits despite not being on the 
                 Missouri List, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Filipino Veterans Promise Act''.

SEC. 2. DETERMINATION OF CERTAIN SERVICE IN PHILIPPINES DURING WORLD 
              WAR II.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense, in consultation with the 
Secretary of Veterans Affairs and such military historians as the 
Secretary of Defense considers appropriate, shall establish a process 
to determine whether a covered individual served as described in 
subsection (a) or (b) of section 107 of title 38, United States Code, 
for purposes of determining whether such covered individual is eligible 
for benefits described in such subsections.
    (b) Covered Individuals.--For purposes of this section, a covered 
individual is any individual who--
            (1) claims service described in subsection (a) or (b) of 
        section 107 of title 38, United States Code; and
            (2) is not included in the Approved Revised Reconstructed 
        Guerilla Roster of 1948, known as the ``Missouri List''.
                                 <all>
```
**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OF        THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1.     | The                  Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008                  (the “Report”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  |
|   | 2.     | Information                  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,                  the                  financial condition and results of operations of the                  Company.                                                  |

|                                           |   | */s/                  Xiaoqun Ye*              |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------|
|  Date:                  November 14, 2008 |   | Xiaoqun                  Ye                    |
|                                           |   | Chief                  Executive Officer       |
|                                           |   | (Principal                  Executive Officer) |
|                                           |   |                                           |
|                                           |   | */s/                  Yan Lin*                 |
|  Date:                  November 14, 2008 |   | Yan                  Lin                       |
|                                           |   | Chief                  Accounting Officer      |
|                                           |   | (Principal                  Financial Officer) |

----
ACCEPTED

01-15-00950-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

11/18/2015 4:19:43 PM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 11/18/2015 4:19:43 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79632]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22368]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 
Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive 
and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; RFA DK23-007 HIRN-CBDS.
    Date: November 21-22, 2024.
    Time: 10:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 
7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual 
Meeting).
    Contact Person: Ann A. Jerkins, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney, 
National Institute of Health, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Rm 7119, 
Bethesda, MD, 20892-2542, 301-594-2242, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b0dad5c2dbd9dec3d1f0ded9d4d4db9eded9d89ed7dfc6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="741e11061f1d1a0715341a1d10101f5a1a1d1c5a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, 
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive 
Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology 
and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)


    Dated: September 24, 2024.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-22368 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**EXHIBIT 10.A.1****AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED CREDIT AGREEMENT**     AMENDMENT dated as of January 19, 2007 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated asof July 31, 2006 (the “**Credit Agreement**”) among **EL PASO CORPORATION, COLORADO INTERSTATE GASCOMPANY**, **EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY**, **TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY**, the several banks and otherfinancial institutions from time to time parties thereto, and **JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.**, asadministrative agent and as collateral agent.     The parties hereto agree as follows:     SECTION 1*.**Defined Terms; References**.*Unless otherwise specificallydefined herein, each term used herein that is defined in the Credit Agreement has the meaningassigned to such term in the Credit Agreement. Each reference to “hereof”, “hereunder”, “herein”and “hereby” and each other similar reference and each reference to “this Agreement” and each othersimilar reference contained in the Credit Agreement shall, after this Amendment becomes effective,refer to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby.     SECTION 2*. Amendment*. The definition of “Consolidated EBITDA” in Section 1.01 of the CreditAgreement is amended by adding the following new clause (x) immediately before the proviso thereto:     *plus*(x) any charges taken during such period in connection with the payment,repayment, redemption, defeasance, early retirement or refinancing of any debt;     SECTION 3*. Representations of Borrowers**.*The Borrowers represent and warrant that(i) the representations and warranties of the Borrowers set forth in Article 4 of the CreditAgreement will be true on and as of the Amendment Effective Date (as defined below) and (ii) noDefault will have occurred and be continuing on such date.     SECTION 4*.**Governing Law**.*This Amendment shall be governed by andconstrued in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.     SECTION 5*.**Counterparts**.*This Amendment may be signed in any number ofcounterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures theretoand hereto were upon the same instrument.     SECTION 6*.**Effectiveness**.*This Amendment shall become effective on thedate (the “**Amendment Effective Date**”) when the Administrative Agent shall have received from eachof the Borrowers and Lenders comprising the Majority Lenders a counterpart hereof signed by suchparty or facsimile or other written confirmation (in form satisfactory to the Administrative Agent)that such party has signed a counterpart hereof.
1

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as ofthe date first above written.      **EL PASO CORPORATION**
# Official Journal C 87A/11 A

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 87A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4911 April 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 87A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4911 April 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2006/C 087A/2 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/43-44/06 to constitute a reserve of linguists administrators (AD7) with main languages Bulgarian and Romanian.These competitions require university graduate level of education and no professional experience. | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2006/C 087A/2

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/43-44/06 to constitute a reserve of linguists administrators (AD7) with main languages Bulgarian and Romanian.These competitions require university graduate level of education and no professional experience.

EPSO/AD/43-44/06

(AD7)

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-1627

In re: BARRY RICHARDSON,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:20-cv-00424-CCE-JLW)

Submitted: April 22, 2021 Decided: April 26, 2021

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, AGEE, Circuit Judge, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barry Richardson, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Barry Richardson, a North Carolina inmate, petitions for a writ of mandamus 

seeking an order directing two North Carolina Superior Court judges to grant his motions 

for appropriate relief and to amend discovery. We conclude that Richardson is not entitled 

to mandamus relief.

Mandamus relief is a drastic remedy and should be used only in extraordinary 

circumstances. Cheney v. U.S. Dist. Ct., 542 U.S. 367, 380 (2004); In re Murphy-Brown, 

LLC, 907 F.3d 788, 795 (4th Cir. 2018). Further, mandamus relief is available only when 

the petitioner has a clear right to the relief sought. Murphy-Brown, 907 F.3d at 795. This 

court does not have jurisdiction to grant mandamus relief against state officials, Gurley v. 

Superior Ct. of Mecklenburg Cnty., 411 F.2d 586, 587 (4th Cir. 1969), and does not have 

jurisdiction to review final state court orders, D.C. Ct. of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 

462, 482 (1983). 

The relief sought by Richardson is not available by way of mandamus. Accordingly,

we deny the petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and 

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-12-0000008 12-JUL-2017 10:49 AM
# C_2015146EN.01003901.xml

| 4.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 146/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 146/39

---

Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Alsharghawi v Council

(Case T-66/15)

(2015/C 146/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bashir Saleh Bashir Alsharghawi (Johannesburg, South Africa) (represented by: É. Moutet, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare that the Council has failed to comply with its obligations under the FEU Treaty by not reviewing his situation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the Council has failed to comply with its obligations under the FEU Treaty by not reviewing his situation;

| — | Order the Council to review his situation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to review his situation;

| — | Order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of his action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law alleging that by not acting on his application for review, the Council failed to comply with its obligations according to the legislation and case-law of the European Union.

---
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-10-00030-CV

FORREST PONTIAC-BUICK-GMC TRUCKS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

THOMAS M. PERNELL, AS TRUSTEE

OF THE PERNELL FAMILY TRUST,

Appellees

From the 413th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court No. C200400588

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant has filed a “Motion to Dismiss Appeal.” See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). 

It states that the trial court granted Appellant’s motion for new trial and that this appeal 

is moot.

Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which it 

would otherwise be entitled. The appeal is dismissed.
Forrest Pontiac v. Pernell Page 2

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Reyna, and 

Justice Davis

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 21, 2010

[CV06]
# C_2018459EN.01000401.xml

| 20.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 459/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 459/4

---

2019 update of the allowances applicable to experts on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council of the European Union

(2018/C 459/06)

In accordance with Article 19(6) of Council Decision (EU) 2015/1027 of 23 June 2015 concerning the rules applicable to experts on secondment to the General Secretariat of the Council and repealing Decision 2007/829/EC (1):

| 1. | From 1 January 2019, the daily allowance as referred to in Article 19 is set at EUR 35,13 and EUR 140,49. |
| --- | --- |

1.

From 1 January 2019, the daily allowance as referred to in Article 19 is set at EUR 35,13 and EUR 140,49.

| 2. | From 1 January 2019, the scale used to calculate reimbursements due on the basis of the distance between the place of recruitment and the place of secondment (in km) is as follows:






  Distance between the place of recruitment and the place of secondment (in km) | Amount (in EUR) |
| --- | --- | --- |
| 0-150 | 0,00 |
| > 150 | 90,31 |
| > 300 | 160,54 |
| > 500 | 260,91 |
| > 800 | 421,46 |
| > 1 300 | 662,30 |
| > 2 000 | 792,77 |

2.

From 1 January 2019, the scale used to calculate reimbursements due on the basis of the distance between the place of recruitment and the place of secondment (in km) is as follows:

Distance between the place of recruitment and the place of secondment (in km)

Amount (in EUR)

0-150

0,00

> 150

90,31

> 300

160,54

> 500

260,91

> 800

421,46

> 1 300

662,30

> 2 000

792,77

---

(1)  OJ L 163, 30.6.2015, p. 40.

---
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 15087.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1932.

Moore & Moss, of Frankston, for appellant..

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CALHOUN, J.

The offense, possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment,. *697confinement In the penitentiary for three years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review. */*

The judgment is affirmed.

PEE. CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.