alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER





Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
1350)





The
undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
respectively, of 2020 ChinaCap Acquirco, Inc., certify that, to the best of
their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2009, which accompanies this certification, fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of 2020 ChinaCap
Acquirco, Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing
certification is made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The
undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
certification except as required by law.




Date:
      October 16, 2009
                  /s/ George LuGeorge
      LuPresident
      and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
      October 16, 2009
                  /s/ Louis KooLouis
      KooVice
      President & Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 177/4 Ju

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 177 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 514 July 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 177

English edition

Legislation

Volume 514 July 2008

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community
   (1) | 1 |
| | * | Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) | 6 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

*

Regulation (EC) No 592/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 amending Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community
   (1)

1

*

Regulation (EC) No 593/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 June 2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I)

6

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22612]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 341 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-687, CP2024-696.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22612 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Dennis SIMS, Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Reginald WILLIAMS, Appellant.

Nos. 75-1714, 75-1715.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Argued Sept. 16, 1976.

Decided Nov. 3, 1976.

Certiorari Denied Jan. 10, 1977.

See 97 S.Ct. 764.

Herbert W. Louthian, Columbia, S. C., for appellant in 75-1715.

Eric William Ruschky, Asst. U. S. Atty., Columbia, S. C. (Mark W. Buyck, Jr., U. S. Atty., Thomas P. Simpson, Asst. U. S. Atty., Columbia, S. C., on brief), for appellee in 75-1714 and 75-1715.

Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Reginald Williams and Dennis Sims were found guilty by a jury of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) and each was sentenced to a prison term of twenty-two years.

Both defendants challenge the giving of a jury instruction on common law confedera*1090tion in addition to a charge under 18 U.S.C. § 2.1 While they concede that in their case there was abundant authority to support a charge of common law confederation, they claim that Congressional enactment of 18 U.S.C. § 2 negates the old common law theory and further argue that the charge should be applied only in conspiracy cases.

We can discern no Congressional intent to eliminate an instruction on a common law confederation by its promulgation of 18 U.S.C. § 2. An instruction on common law confederation raises a question concerning the admissibility of evidence, a theory of proof rather than offense. We therefore find that the trial judge did not err by giving both instructions. *See Carpenter v. United States,*264 F.2d 565 (4th Cir. 1959), *cert. denied,*360 U.S. 936, 79 S.Ct. 1459, 3 L.Ed.2d 1548. It is clear that the use of an instruction on common law confederation is not confined to conspiracy cases. *Hilliard v. United States,*121 F.2d 992 (4th Cir. 1941), *cert. denied,*314 U.S. 627, 62 S.Ct. 111, 86 L.Ed. 503; *United States v. Sapperstein,*312 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1963).

The judgment of the district is accordingly affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

1

. 18 U.S.C. § 2 provides:

> (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.

> (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.
ptla-ex1041_316.htm



 

Exhibit 10.41

Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 
Stock Option Grant Notice
Inducement Plan

 

 

Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to its 2013 Inducement Plan (the “Plan”), hereby awards to Participant a Stock Option Award (the “Award”) in respect of the number of shares set forth below.  The Award is subject to all of the terms and conditions as set forth herein, including the Vesting Criteria set forth below, the Plan and the Option Agreement (the “Option Agreement”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Plan or the Option Agreement, as applicable.  Except as provided herein, in the event of any conflict between such provisions, the terms of the Plan shall control.

 


	
Participant:
	
 
	
%%FIRST_NAME %-% %%MIDDLE_NAME%-% %%LAST_NAME%-%

	
Employee ID:
	
 
	
%%EMPLOYEE_IDENTIFIER%-%

	
Grant Number:
	
 
	
%%OPTION_NUMBER%-%

	
Date of Grant:
	
 
	
%%OPTION_DATE,’Month DD, YYYY’%-% 

	
Number of Shares Subject to Award:
	
 
	
%%TOTAL_SHARES_GRANTED,’999,999,999’%-%

	
Option Price:
	
 
	
%%OPTION_PRICE,’$999,999,999.99’%-%

	
Total Option Price:
	
 
	
%%TOTAL_OPTION_PRICE,’$999,999,999.99’%-%

	
Grant Type:
	
 
	
Nonstatutory Stock Option




 

Vesting Terms:  Stock options subject to the Award shall become vested and exercisable as described below: 

 


	
Shares
	
Vest Type
	
Full Vest
	
Expiration

	
%%SHARES_PERIOD1,’999,999,999’%-%
	
%%VEST_TYPE_PERIOD1%-%
	
%%VEST_DATE_PERIOD1,’Month DD, YYYY’%-%
	
%%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD1,’Month DD, YYYY’%-%

	
%%decode(SHARES_PERIOD2, 0, null, SHARES_PERIOD2),’999,999,999’%-%
	
%%VEST_TYPE_PERIOD2%-%
	
%%VEST_DATE_PERIOD2,’Month DD, YYYY’%-%
	
%%EXPIRE_DATE_PERIOD2,’Month DD, YYYY’%-%




 

Stock options which do not become vested and exercisable during the relevant vesting term set forth above will be forfeited.

 

For the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of a Change in Control, (a) the stock options subject to this Award are considered “options to purchase the Company’s common stock” for purposes of Section 2.2(b) 

 

1



 

of the Executive Severance Benefits Agreement between the Participant and the Company, and (b) this Award, including any unvested and/or unexercised portion hereof, shall continue in effect or otherwise be subject to disposition under the transaction agreement as a Stock Award, pursuant to Section 9(c) of the Plan (relating to Corporate Transactions).

 

Additional Terms/Acknowledgements:  The undersigned Participant acknowledges receipt of, and understands and agrees to, this Grant Notice, the Option Agreement and the Plan.  Participant further acknowledges that as of the Date of Grant, this Grant Notice, the Option Agreement and the Plan set forth the entire understanding between Participant and the Company regarding the Award and supersedes all prior oral and written agreements on that subject.

 


					
	
Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	
 
	
Participant

	
 
	
 

	
By: /s/ Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
	
 

	
Signature
	
Signature

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Date:
	
 
	
Date:
	
 




 

 


	
Attachments: 
	
Option Agreement and Inducement Plan




 

 

 

 

2
Carbon Capture Demonstration Projects of Interest
Scheduled
Date of Operation Project Name State Description Capture Type DOE Funding Status/Additional Details

2014 Plant Ratcliffe

Mississippi Power MS A ir

- blown 582 MW IGCC plant using a coal

- based transport gasifier Pre

combustion $270 million Being constructed

2015 Texas Clean Energy Project

Summit Power Group TX 400 MW IGCC polygeneration plant Pre

combustion $450 million CPS Energy signed a PPA with Summit Power Group in January 2012

2015 Indiana Gasification

Leucadia IN C oal gasification project that
include s a methanation process to produce pipeline quality synthetic natural gas Pre

combustion TBD Public comment period on draft PSD and operating p ermits closed January 30, 2012

2016 Taylorville Energy Center

Tenaska IL 602 MW IGCC p ower plant Pre

combustion $2.579 billion

loan guarantee Being debated in state legislature

Sources: Global CCS Institute Indiana Department of Environmental Management Chicago Tribune 2012

• NSPS proposal 2013 2014

• Plant Ratcliffe 2015

• Texas Clean Energy Project

• Indiana Gasification 2016

• Taylorville Energy Center
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 97-213 Date: November 19, 1997 

Subject: Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance: Revision of SF 2817

(Life Insurance Election)

Date of Revision The revised form is dated August 1997.

Purpose of The form has been revised to state that agencies are no longer

Revision required to complete a Standard Form (SF) 2817 for new employees

who fail to file, to state that the United States Postal Service (USPS)

may provide Basic insurance at no cost to employees, to show that the

form can be used by assignees, to state that divorce and death of a

spouse are events that allow the election of Option B and Option C under

certain circumstances, to clarify that only the employee or assignee can

sign the form, and to make minor changes to aid the readability of the

form.

When Available The revised SF 2817 will be available starting November 1997 from

GSA/FSS using the normal FEDSTRIP/MILSTRIP* procedures as

specified by your agency's procurement or acquisitions office.

The revised SF 2817 is now available as an Adobe Acrobat Portable

Document Format (PDF) file on our website at

http://www.opm.gov/forms.

Previous Editions Previous editions are not usable.

Stock Number and The National Stock Number (NSN) for the SF 2817 is 7540-01

Cost 231-4280. The cost is $8.33 per hundred.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy 

 and Information Division

* FEDSTRIP/MILSTRIP is the ordering procedure used by agencies to procure items from General Services Administration

(GSA) Federal Supply Depot.
#### BISBEE v. HOLSON.

No. 1697.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Oct. 1, 1937.

L. M. Williams and Jas. A. Stephens, both of Benjamin, for appellant.

M. F. Billingsley, of Munday, for ap-pellee.

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

This case has been submitted upon the record only; no briefs having been filed by either of the parties. It appears from the record that the judgment of the court below was superseded by a bond given for that purpose. The giving of the bond did not, as a matter of law, affect our option to dismiss the appeal or to examine the record for fundamental errors, and make disposition accordingly, as decided in Haynes v. J. M. Radford Groc. Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.(2d) 811. However, unless such circumstances appear to suggest that a dismissal is the more appropriate action, it occurs to us that where a judgment has been superseded it is the more preferable to examine the record to ascertain if there be any fundamental errors precluding an affirmance of the judgment. Under this view, we have examined the record and have noted no errors.

It is accordingly our opinion that the judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.3
 BRIGHAM EXPLORATION COMPANY
    Letter to The Depository Trust Company Participantsfor Tender of All
    Outstanding
    95/8% Senior
    Notes due 2014
    in Exchange for Registered
    95/8% Senior
    Notes due 2014
  THE EXCHANGE OFFER WILL EXPIRE
    AT 5:00 P.M., NEW YORK CITY TIME,
    ON          ,
    2007 UNLESS EXTENDED (SUCH TIME AND DATE, AS THE SAME MAY BE
    EXTENDED FROM TIME TO TIME, THE EXPIRATION DATE).
    TENDERS MAY BE WITHDRAWN AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION
    DATE.          ,
    2007
     5 8 5 8
      Form W-9
            
    any Exchange Notes received are being acquired in the ordinary
    course of business of the person receiving such Exchange Notes;
    such person does not have an arrangement or understanding with
    any person to participate in the distribution of the Outstanding
    Notes or the Exchange Notes within the meaning of the Securities
    Act;
    such person is not an affiliate, as defined in
    Rule 405 under the Securities Act, of BEXP or any
    guarantor, or, if it is such an affiliate, it will comply with
    the registration and prospectus delivery requirements of the
    Securities Act to the extent applicable;
    if such person is not a broker-dealer, it is not engaged in, and
    does not intend to engage in, a distribution of Exchange Notes;




---



##### 




    if such person is a broker-dealer, it will receive Exchange
    Notes in exchange for Outstanding Notes that were acquired for
    its own account as a result of market-making activities or other
    trading activities, and it will deliver a prospectus in
    connection with any resale of such Exchange Notes; however, by
    so acknowledging and by delivering a prospectus, it will not be
    deemed to admit that it is an underwriter within the
    meaning of the Securities Act;
    if such person is a broker-dealer, it did not purchase the
    Outstanding Notes to be exchanged for the Exchange Notes from
    BEXP or any guarantor; and
    such person is not acting on behalf of any person who could not
    truthfully and completely make the foregoing representations.           2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 7, 2023

NO. 03-23-00083-CV

W. G., Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, SMITH, AND JONES

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE SMITH

This is an appeal from the order signed by the trial court on February 9, 2023. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s order. Because appellant is 

indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3126 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3126

  To prohibit the Commissioner of Social Security from furnishing the 
  name of any individual in a report to the National Instant Criminal 
   Background Check System unless a Federal court has determined the 
                  individual to be mentally defective.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2015

 Mr. Abraham (for himself, Mr. Benishek, and Mr. Jones) introduced the 
 following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prohibit the Commissioner of Social Security from furnishing the 
  name of any individual in a report to the National Instant Criminal 
   Background Check System unless a Federal court has determined the 
                  individual to be mentally defective.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That upon a request by 
the Attorney General to the Commissioner of Social Security to furnish 
information pursuant to section 103(e)(1) of the Brady Handgun Violence 
Prevention Act, the Commissioner of Social Security may not furnish the 
name of any individual entitled to benefits under title II of the 
Social Security Act, including any individual whose benefits are paid 
to a representative payee under section 205(j) of such Act, unless a 
Federal court has determined the individual to be mentally defective.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:      May 24, 2007
    /s/   DON R. MADISONDon R. MadisonExecutive Vice President
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer 30
**Exhibit 5.1**[Thompson & Knight LLP letterhead]May 9, 2007Brigham Exploration Company
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 322 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 322

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. 
                    Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2015

    Mrs. Wagner (for herself, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Clay, Mr. Smith of 
  Missouri, Mr. Luetkemeyer, Mr. Long, Mr. Cleaver, and Mr. Graves of 
  Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ``Sgt. 
                    Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SGT. ZACHARY M. FISHER POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, shall 
be known and designated as the ``Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Sgt. 
Zachary M. Fisher Post Office''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 33/9 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 33 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 499 February 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 33

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 499 February 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 033/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 033/2 | Extract of reorganisation measure decided on pursuant to Article 3(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions. | 2 |
| 2006/C 033/3 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4132 — Lehman Brothers/Heinz European Seafood) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 4 |
| 2006/C 033/4 | New national side of euro circulation coins | 5 |
| 2006/C 033/5 | New national side of euro circulation coins | 6 |
| 2006/C 033/6 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4128 — Adecco/Deutscher Industrie Service) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 7 |
| 2006/C 033/7 | Planned closure of complaint 2004/5008 | 8 |
| 2006/C 033/8 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4028 — Flaga/Progas/JV) (1) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 033/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 033/2

Extract of reorganisation measure decided on pursuant to Article 3(1) and (2) of Directive 2001/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the reorganisation and winding up of credit institutions.

2

2006/C 033/3

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4132 — Lehman Brothers/Heinz European Seafood) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

4

2006/C 033/4

New national side of euro circulation coins

5

2006/C 033/5

New national side of euro circulation coins

6

2006/C 033/6

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M.4128 — Adecco/Deutscher Industrie Service) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

7

2006/C 033/7

Planned closure of complaint 2004/5008

8

2006/C 033/8

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.4028 — Flaga/Progas/JV) (1)

9

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN