alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State v. Cox, 2019-Ohio-1399.]

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS 

TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO 

CLERMONT COUNTY 

STATE OF OHIO, : 

 Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2018-05-026 

 : D E C I S I O N 

 - vs - 4/15/2019 

 : 

EUGENE E. COX, : 

 Appellant. : 

CRIMINAL APPEAL FROM CLERMONT COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS 

Case No. 2018 CR 00019 

D. Vincent Faris, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, Nicholas Horton, 76 South 

Riverside Drive, 2nd Floor, Batavia, Ohio 45103, for appellee 

W. Stephen Haynes, Clermont County Public Defender, Robert F. Benintendi, 302 East 

Main Street, Batavia, Ohio 45103, for appellant 

Eugene E. Cox, #A-743489, Madison Correctional Institution, 1851 State Route 56, 

London, Ohio 43140, appellant, pro se 

 Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} This cause came on to be considered upon a notice of appeal filed by 

appellant Eugene E. Cox, the transcript of the docket and journal entries, the transcript 

of proceedings and original papers from the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, 

and upon the brief filed by appellant's counsel and appellant's pro se brief. 

{¶ 2} Appellant's counsel has filed a brief with this court pursuant to Anders v. 
______________________ 

- 2 - 

California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), which (1) indicates that a careful review 

of the record from the proceedings below fails to disclose any errors by the trial court 

prejudicial to the rights of appellant upon which an assignment of error may be 

predicated; (2) lists one potential error "that might arguably support the appeal," Anders 

at 744, 87 S.Ct. at 1400; (3) requests that this court review the record independently to 

determine whether the proceedings are free from prejudicial error and without 

infringement of appellant's constitutional rights; (4) requests permission to withdraw as 

counsel for appellant on the basis that the appeal is wholly frivolous; and (5) certifies 

that a copy of both the brief and motion to withdraw have been served upon appellant. 

{¶ 3} Appellant has filed a pro se brief raising one assignment of error pertaining 

to the 30-month sentence he received. 

{¶ 4} We have accordingly examined the record, the potential assignment of 

error presented in counsel's brief, and the assignment of error in appellant's pro se brief, 

and find no error prejudicial to appellant's rights in the proceedings in the trial court. The 

motion of counsel for appellant requesting to withdraw as counsel is granted, and this 

appeal is dismissed for the reason that it is wholly frivolous. 

 HENDRICKSON, P.J., RINGLAND and PIPER, JJ., concur.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

I, Paritosh K. Choksi, Executive Vice President of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of ATEL
12, LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:



| | 1. | The Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: November 13, 2007

|                                                                                                                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                     
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                               
|Paritosh K. Choksi                                                                                                                   
|Principal financial officer of Registrant; principal financial officer and director of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Manager of Registrant

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER>  1
   <NAME> POTOMAC CAPITAL INVESTMENT CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,401,171
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         416,066
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       686,951
<OTHER-ASSETS>                               1,387,698
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,891,886
<COMMON>                                       118,500
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,010,407
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            760,285
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,889,192
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          142,500
<PREFERRED>                                    125,298
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,767,598
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               8,090<F1>
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 123,300<F1>
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  151,460
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                          985
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    162,936      
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,772
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               2,499,755
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,891,886
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,010,311
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           134,085 
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,527,787
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,661,872
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        348,439
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                              27,924 
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 376,363
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       139,403
<NET-INCOME>                                   236,960 
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     16,604
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  220,356 
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       196,612 
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      133,000<F2>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         467,839
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $1.86 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F3>
<FN>
<F1>Included on the Balance Sheet in the caption "Short-term debt."
<F2>Total annualized interest costs for all utility long-term debt outstanding
at December 31, 1996.
<F3>No material dilution would occur if all the convertible preferred stock and
debentures were converted into common stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3276 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require States to provide 

for same day registration. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. ELLISON introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on House Administration 

A BILL 

To amend the Help America Vote Act of 2002 to require 

States to provide for same day registration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Same Day Registration 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title III of the Help America 

8 Vote Act of 2002 (52 U.S.C. 21081 et seq.) is amended— 

9 (1) by redesignating sections 304 and 305 as 

10 sections 305 and 306, respectively; and 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3276 IH

1 (2) by inserting after section 303 the following 

2 new section: 

3 ‘‘SEC. 304. SAME DAY REGISTRATION. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.— 

5 ‘‘(1) REGISTRATION.—Notwithstanding section 

6 8(a)(1)(D) of the National Voter Registration Act of 

7 1993 (52 U.S.C. 20507(a)(1)(D)), each State shall 

8 permit any eligible individual on the day of a Fed9 eral election and on any day when voting, including 

10 early voting, is permitted for a Federal election— 

11 ‘‘(A) to register to vote in such election at 

12 the polling place using a form that meets the 

13 requirements under section 9(b) of the National 

14 Voter Registration Act of 1993 (or, if the indi15 vidual is already registered to vote, to revise 

16 any of the individual’s voter registration infor17 mation); and 

18 ‘‘(B) to cast a vote in such election. 

19 ‘‘(2) EXCEPTION.—The requirements under 

20 paragraph (1) shall not apply to a State in which, 

21 under a State law in effect continuously on and after 

22 the date of the enactment of this section, there is no 

23 voter registration requirement for individuals in the 

24 State with respect to elections for Federal office. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3276 IH

1 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL.—For purposes of this 

2 section, the term ‘eligible individual’ means, with respect 

3 to any election for Federal office, an individual who is oth4 erwise qualified to vote in that election. 

5 ‘‘(c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—Each State shall be re6 quired to comply with the requirements of subsection (a) 

7 for the regularly scheduled general election for Federal of8 fice occurring in November 2016 and for any subsequent 

9 election for Federal office.’’. 

10 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

11 (1) Section 401 of such Act (52 U.S.C. 21111) 

12 is amended by striking ‘‘and 303’’ and inserting 

13 ‘‘303, and 304’’. 

14 (2) The table of contents of such Act is amend15 ed— 

16 (A) by redesignating the items relating to 

17 sections 304 and 305 as relating to sections 

18 305 and 306, respectively; and 

19 (B) by inserting after the item relating to 

20 section 303 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 304. Same day registration.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
1 

### Meeting Summary: **PHMB Focus Meeting**
**U.S. EPA & Lonza Inc.** September 19, 2012, 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM
Room S

- 8671 , 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202

Participant s
Lonza Inc. : Kari Mavian, Nick Jermstad, Bob Sloan, Nick Skoulis* EPA: Timothy Dole, Pat Jennings, Steve Weiss, Najm Shamim, Srinivas Gowda, Michelle Centra, Jonathan Chen, Lance Wormell, Donna Randall*, Rebecca von dem Hagen *participated via phone

Meeting Summary On September 19, 2012 AD hosted its first registration review Focus Meeting with PHMB technical registrant Lonza Inc. The purpose of the meeting was to discuss outstanding issues from the registration
review Pr eliminary Work Plan (PWP), published in June 2012

, in order to inf orm the Final Work Plan (FWP) , scheduled to publish in December 2012. During the meeting the Agency and industry discussed the impacts of the product chemistry of the 20% and 96.3% TGAIs on the anticipated registration review data requirements. Also, the registrant provided information on existing data generated for registrations in the EU and the Agency provided clarification on the overlap of registration review and the post

- RED Data Call

- In

.

Next Steps The Agency intends to issue the FWP in December 2012 continuing to anticipate that data be required
on both the 20% and 96.3% TGAIs with the caveat that i f information is provided to the Agency proving that polymer characterization is the same for both TGAIs, then data are anticipated to be required on the more toxic TGAI only.
# Official Journal C 329/2022

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 329 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6531 August 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 329

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6531 August 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 329/01 | Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/675 | 1 |
| 2022/C 329/02 | Euro exchange rates — 30 August 2022 | 2 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2022/C 329/01

Information from the Commission pursuant to Council Decision (EU) 2022/675

1

2022/C 329/02

Euro exchange rates — 30 August 2022

2

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2022/C 329/03 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10898 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / HOP LUN) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 3 |
| 2022/C 329/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10870 - CAPVEST / NATRA) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 5 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2022/C 329/03

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10898 – PLATINUM EQUITY GROUP / HOP LUN) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

3

2022/C 329/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10870 - CAPVEST / NATRA) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

5

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# C_2021184EN.01000501.xml

| 12.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive agreements and dominant positions at its meeting on 18 March 2021 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.40023 – Cross-border access to pay-TV

Rapporteur: Poland

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2021/C 184/05)

| 1. | The Advisory Committee (13 Member States) agrees with the Commission to withdraw its decision of 7 March 2019, notified under document C(2019) 1772 final, by adopting the draft withdrawal decision, communicated to the Advisory Committee, under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The Advisory Committee (13 Member States) agrees with the Commission to withdraw its decision of 7 March 2019, notified under document C(2019) 1772 final, by adopting the draft withdrawal decision, communicated to the Advisory Committee, under Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement.

| 2. | The Advisory Committee (13 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Advisory Committee (13 Member States) recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
# C_2015363EN.01000502.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 September 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht München — Germany) — Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland GmbH v Hauptzollamt Regensburg

(Case C-687/13) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Dumping - Anti-dumping duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in China - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 - Validity - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 2(7)(a) - Normal value - Determination on the basis of the price in a market economy third country - Selection of the appropriate third country - Duty of care - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons - Sampling))

(2015/C 363/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht München

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Fliesen-Zentrum Deutschland GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Regensburg

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question referred for a preliminary ruling has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 of 12 September 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
                                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                                  ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT ACQUISITION CORP.

This certification is provided
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and accompanies the quarterly
report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended June 30, 2007, of Alternative
Asset Management Acquisition Corp. (the Issuer).

I,
Paul D. Lapping, the Principal Financial Officer of the Issuer,          certify that to
the best of my knowledge:

| | (i) |  | the
Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of                            Section
13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities                            Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d));                            and
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (ii) |  | the
information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly                            presents, in all
material respects, the financial                            condition and results of
operations of the Issuer.
| | ---- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|Dated:  September 17, 2007 |  | /s/ Paul D. Lapping
|-------------------------- |  | -------------------
|                           |  | Paul D. Lapping
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3256 

To require each agency to repeal or revise 1 or more existing regulations 

before issuing a new regulation, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. MCCAUL (for himself, Mr. COOK, Mr. LONG, Mr. WITTMAN, Mr. ALLEN, 

Mr. PALMER, Mr. BRAT, Mr. KATKO, and Mr. CULBERSON) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 

Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, 

for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case 

for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 

committee concerned 

A BILL 

To require each agency to repeal or revise 1 or more existing 

regulations before issuing a new regulation, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘One In, One Out Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. REPEAL OR REVISION OF REGULATIONS REQUIRED 

6 BEFORE ISSUANCE OF A NEW RULE. 

7 (a) DEFINITIONS.—In this section— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3256 IH

1 (1) the terms ‘‘agency’’ and ‘‘rule’’ have the 

2 meanings given those terms in section 551 of title 5, 

3 United States Code; and 

4 (2) the term ‘‘State’’ means each of the several 

5 States, the District of Columbia, each territory or 

6 possession of the United States, and each federally 

7 recognized Indian tribe. 

8 (b) REQUIREMENT FOR RULE.—An agency may not 

9 issue a rule unless the agency has repealed or revised in 

10 a way that reduces costs to the regulated entities 1 or 

11 more rules described in subsection (e) that, to the extent 

12 practicable, are related to the rule. 

13 (c) REQUIREMENT FOR NEW RULES.— 

14 (1) REPEAL REQUIRED.—An agency may not 

15 issue a rule unless— 

16 (A) the agency has repealed 1 or more 

17 rules described in subsection (e) that, to the ex18 tent practicable, are related to the rule; and 

19 (B) the cost of the new rule is less than or 

20 equal to the cost of the rules repealed or re21 vised. 

22 (2) CERTIFIED COST.—For any rule subject to 

23 paragraph (1), the Administrator of the Office of In24 formation and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of 

25 Management and Budget shall certify, before the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3256 IH

1 rule is issued, that the cost of the new rule is equal 

2 to or less than the cost of the rules repealed or re3 vised. 

4 (d) PUBLICATION REQUIRED.—Any rule repealed or 

5 revised under subsection (b) or (c) shall be published in 

6 the Federal Register. 

7 (e) APPLICABILITY.—This section— 

8 (1) applies to any rule that imposes a cost or 

9 responsibility on a nongovernmental person or a 

10 State or local government; and 

11 (2) shall not apply to any rule— 

12 (A) that relates to procurement by the 

13 agency; or 

14 (B) that is being revised to be less burden15 some to decrease requirements imposed by the 

16 rule or cost of compliance. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelby Acquisition II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
      R. Kerr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                James R. KerrJames
                R. KerrPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerJune
                16, 2008
#### KING v. STATE.

No. 17178.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 23, 1935.

John J. Pichinson, of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for assault to rob; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The record is devoid of any bills'of exception. The facts are in a condition of conflict. The state’s testimony, if believed by the jury, unquestionably made out a case of assault' with intent to rob. The testimony for the appellant amounted to a denial of the state’s case and an effort to prove an alibi. The reconciliation of conflicts in testimony is a matter for the jury. The testimony of the state witnesses, if true, made out a complete case. The use of the word “attempt” in the indictment instead of the word “intent” does not vitiate same. Atkinson v. State, 34 Tex. Cr. R. 424, 30 S. W. 1064; Runnells v. State, 34 Tex. Cr. R. 431, 30 S. W. 1065.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.