alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BATES v. RAILROAD COMMISSION et al.

No. 8988.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

March 13, 1940.

Rehearing Denied April 10, 1940.

A. M. Felts, of Austin, for appellant.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and Glenni R. Lewis and Geo. W. Barcus, Asst. Attys.. Gen., for appellees.

McClendon, chief justice.

Appeal from a final judgment of dismissal (after sustaining a general demurrer and Bates’s declining to amend) in a suit in which Bates sought to enjoin the Commission, its members, and certain other - officials and employees of the State, from; interfering with his operating over the state highways of twelve trucks, “in the-transportation of merchandise and freight for hire exclusively in interstate commerce-by motor vehicle.” Bates had no certificate, permit or other authorization from the Texas Commission to operate over Texas highways; but claimed the right to so operate under the “grandfather clause” of the Federal Motor Carrier Act 1935, 49 U.S.C. § 306, 49 U.S.C.A. § 306. The case is ruled by the decisions in McDonald v. Thompson, 305 U.S. 263, 59 S.Ct. 176, 83 L.Ed. 164; Winton v. Thompson, Tex.Civ.App., 123 S.W.2d 951, error refused; Railroad Comm. v. Tips, Tex.Civ.App., 130 S.W.2d 1078.

The trial court’s judgment is affirmed..

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.1





Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Purio Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Dated:  August 19, 2009





By:      /s/ Daryl English


Daryl English


President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Secretary, Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 332 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 332

To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prescribe an additional 
requirement for the designation of marine sanctuaries off the coast of 
                                Alaska.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 13, 2015

 Mr. Young of Alaska introduced the following bill; which was referred 
                 to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the National Marine Sanctuaries Act to prescribe an additional 
requirement for the designation of marine sanctuaries off the coast of 
                                Alaska.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LIMITATION ON AUTHORITY TO DESIGNATE MARINE SANCTUARIES.

    Section 303 of the National Marine Sanctuaries Act (16 U.S.C. 1433) 
is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a), by striking ``The Secretary may'' 
        and inserting ``Subject to subsection (c), the Secretary may''; 
        and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(c) Limitation.--The Secretary may not designate as a national 
marine sanctuary any area of the marine environment off the coast of 
Alaska seaward of the high tide line unless an Act of Congress--
            ``(1) requires the Secretary to make such a designation; 
        and
            ``(2) prescribes the boundaries of the area to be given 
        such designation by the Secretary.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John Wesley PHIPPS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 76-2411

Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 6, 1976.

P. Bruce Kirwan, Federal Public Defender, Atlanta, Ga., for defendant-appellant.

John W. Stokes, U. S. Atty., Dorothy T. Beasley, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before WISDOM, GEE and TJOFLAT, Circuit Judges.

*

 Rule 18, 5 Cir., *see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al.,*5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.

PER CURIAM:

When about three months were left in Appellant Phipps’ prison term, the government transferred him to a Federal “pre-release” center. At that time, officials of the center explained to Phipps that he could leave during the day after signing out, but that he must return each night. On September 4, 1975, six weeks before his scheduled release date, Phipps failed to return after signing out first for 8 p. m., and later for 11 p. m. The police located him on December 7, 1975, and arrested him for violations of 18 U.S.C. §§ 4082(d) and 751: escape from a federal community center. Phipps appeals from the jury verdict of *577guilty, claiming that the trial judge erred in denying his motion for acquittal made at the close of the government’s evidence, since the government allegedly failed to prove he had the specific intent to escape. We affirm.

First, Phipps’ appeal fails because of the rule that where, as here, a defendant puts on evidence after moving for acquittal under F.R.Crim.P. 29(a), he waives objection to the denial of that motion unless he renews his motion at the close of all the evidence. *United States v. Perez,*526 F.2d 859 (5 Cir. 1976); *United States v. Edwards,*488 F.2d 1154 (5 Cir. 1974). No renewed motion was made.

An exception to the above rule has been suggested where to deny the appeal would further a manifest miscarriage of justice. *United States v. Perez,*526 F.2d 859 (5 Cir. 1976) (dicta). If it exists, the exception does not apply here. The evidence in the instant case supports the jury verdict and does not result in a manifest injustice. The procedures of the center were well-known to Phipps. Despite his asserted illiteracy and low intelligence, he demonstrated his understanding of the signout procedure by returning on the day he escaped long enough to change the time. He never made any attempt to return during the entire three-months period. Appellant insists that he did not escape “willfully” because he left upset and confused over the alleged death of his brother (still unconfirmed). Needless to say, however, the government’s proof does not have to show that he intended to escape at the moment he left the correction center. *Chandler v. United States,*378 F.2d 906, 907-08 (9 Cir. 1967). The jury could fairly have inferred that Phipps formed the requisite intent later, although still “on or about the 4th day of September, 1975,” as the indictment charges.

AFFIRMED.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 324 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 258
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 324

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           September 25, 2015

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

                            October 8, 2015

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Lt. Daniel P. 
                         Riordan Post Office''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. LT. DANIEL P. RIORDAN POST OFFICE.

    (a) Designation.--The facility of the United States Postal Service 
located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, shall be known 
and designated as the ``Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the facility referred to 
in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Lt. Daniel 
P. Riordan Post Office''.
                                                       Calendar No. 258

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 324

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located 
 at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ``Lt. Daniel P. 
                         Riordan Post Office''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 8, 2015

                       Reported without amendment
```
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to theincorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 33-44581, 33-44582,333-106330, 333-39738, 333-66426 and 333-120100 on Form S-8 and RegistrationStatement Nos. 333-47714, 333-120111 and 333-128002 on Form S-3 of our reportdated February 27, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements andconsolidated financial statement schedule of Public Service Enterprise GroupIncorporated, which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includesexplanatory paragraphs for the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards BoardInterpretation No. 48, *Accounting forUncertainty in Income Taxes – an Interpretation of FASB Statement*109 and Statement of FinancialAccounting Standards No. 158, *Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension andOther Postretirement Plans*, and our report dated February 26, 2008,relating to the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service Enterprise GroupIncorporated for the year ended December 31, 2007.

/s/ Deloitte & ToucheLLP

February 27, 2008

----
Tips for Work-Life Coordinators and Supervisors

Mental Health

Caring for the mental well-being of Federal employees is 

always a priority. As we prepare for the eventual return of 

employees to the workplace, Work-Life Coordinators and 

Supervisors should strive to be aware of the mental health 

factors that may affect an employee’s transition back 

into their work location and the resources available. 

 Be aware that employees may be returning to the 

workplace with concerns and responsibilities that 

may not have been present before the pandemic. 

Flexibilities are encouraged to help employees who may 

need modified workplace schedules or arrangements 

to deal with unforeseen circumstances. 

 Talk with employees and be aware of their concerns. 

Offer information about agency resources such 

as Employee Assistance Programs (EAP) and 

Family and Dependent Care resources. 

 Be sensitive to employee concerns that 

may contribute to anxiety. 

Examples of concerns include safe commuting, disinfecting 

protocols, and plans for social distancing at the workplace. 

 Put a plan in place to communicate and discuss 

agency defined procedures and processes 

regarding return to work protocols. 

Help empower employees and help alleviate potential anxiety 

by keeping employees informed on agency procedures. 

 Ask for employee input on solutions. 

Facilitate an open dialogue regarding how to 

handle new challenges that may arise. Seek and 

implement employee feedback where possible.

more information

Contact your local

HR office to find

your agency’s

EAP Administrator

or search OPM’s

Work-Life Contact

Tool available at: 

opm.gov/CCLContact

Additional 

information 

is available at 

opm.gov/worklife

OPM’s Work-Life staff is here to assist. 

Please reach out to us any time at worklife@opm.gov.

ES-03382-B 10/2020
WORK-LIFE

health & wellness

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

1900 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20415

Stay hydrated. Getting 

enough water every 

day is important for 

your health. 

Take the stairs. Just two 

minutes of stair climbing a 

day can prevent the pound 

of weight that the average 

American adult gains each 

year.

Take a stand. Research 

suggests that sitting for long 

periods is linked with health 

problems, including obesity 

and high blood pressure. 

Visit the farmers 

market to access 

healthy, fresh food. 

Biking to work, or during 

breaks, is healthy, 

environmentally friendly, 

and fun. 

Quit smoking. All 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits plans 

oer 100% coverage to 

help you quit.

Look for signs or 

symbols that identify 

healthier food and 

beverage choices in 

vending machines. 

New Mothers - Use 

lactation rooms and 

flexible scheduling to 

continue to pump when 

returning to work.

Get some exercise

before or after work, 

or during breaks. 

Get a yearly flu 

vaccine. It is the 

single best way to 

prevent seasonal flu. 

Know where to find an 

Automated External 

Defibrillator. AEDs 

could save 50,000 

lives each year.

Choose healthy 

food choices during 

lunch. 

Consider healthy food 

choices when hosting 

meetings or oce social 

events. 

Wash your hands 

regularly to avoid 

getting sick and 

prevent the spread of 

germs.

Creating an environment that helps employees adopt and maintain healthy behaviors 

is key to a successful worksite health and wellness program. This infographic 

highlights evidence-based health promotion strategies agencies can employ to 

create a culture of wellness.

health & wellness

A HEALTHY

WORK ENVIRONMENT

Contact your local HR oce to find your agency Worksite Health & Wellness 

Coordinator or search OPM's Work-Life Contact Tool available at: 

https://www.opm.gov/CCLContact/.

Sources:

http://safti.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Take-the-Stairs-GSA-Takes-the-Lead-in-Reinventing-Stairways

-That-Promote-Better-Health-and-Productivity.pdf

http://www.mayoclinic.org/healthy-lifestyle/adult-health/expert-answers/sitting/faq-20058005

https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/worklife/health-wellness/ 

http://www.redcross.org/prepare/location/workplace/easy-as-aed
AIR-09-248-E

August 25, 2010 

 Exemption No. 10122 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0442 

Mr. Greg W. Gremminger 

Magni Gyro srl and Magni USA LLC 

17225 Pleasant View Drive 

Ste. Genevieve, MO 63670 

Dear Mr. Gremminger: 

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated May 5, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on 

behalf of Magni Gyro srl and Magni USA LLC (Magni Gyro) for an exemption from 

§§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193 (e)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The 

proposed exemption, if granted, would allow Magni Gyro to produce and sell gyroplanes for 

certification under § 21.191(i) without previously having manufactured and assembled a 

gyroplane of the same make and model that has been issued a special airworthiness 

certificated in the light-sport category under § 21.190.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Magni Gyro. 

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material 

respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10099 (copy 

enclosed), the FAA did not believe it is in the public interest to permit a manufacturer to sell a 

make and model of gyroplane (or aircraft kit), eligible for the issuance of an experimental 

certificate in the light-sport category, if that manufacturer has not yet produced a gyroplane of 

that make and model that meets the accepted consensus standards. 

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that— 
2 

 they don’t differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial 

of exemption; 

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the 

situation you present; and 

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest. 

Our Decision 

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition Magni Gyro srl and Magni USA LLC for an 

exemption from 14 CFR §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193(e)(1). 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

K.C. Yanamura 

Acting Director, Aircraft Certification Service 

Enclosure
EXHIBIT
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
      for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
      Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Firoz H. Lalji, Chairman and
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1) The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and





(2) The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date:
      May
      11, 2007








/S/
                FIROZ H LALJIFiroz
                H. LaljiChairman
                and Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1


Section 1350 Certification


of Robert Dixon (President and Chief Executive Officer)





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of  MacKenzie Realty Capital, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Robert Dixon, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Robert Dixon__________________


Robert Dixon


President and Chief Executive Officer


September 30, 2013
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 WASHINGTON, DC 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
 SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 August 7, 2007
 WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
   
  1-11953
    
    98-0160660(Commission File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer Identification No.)Plaza 2000 Building, 50th Street, 8th Floor, P.O. Box 0816-01098, Panama, Republic of Panama(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
  
   
  see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBIT INDEXPress Release dated August 7, 2007Press Release - Conference CallPress Release dated August 9, 2007    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
     
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  99.1
    
    
    Press release dated August 7, 2007, issued by the Registrant.99.2
    
    
    Transcript of the Registrants August 7, 2007 conference call.99.3
    
    
    Press release dated August 9, 2007, issued by the Registrant.
 
 SIGNATURES
  WILLBROS GROUP, INC.Date:  August 13, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Van A. WelchVan A. WelchSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 2




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press release dated August 7, 2007, issued by the Registrant.99.2
    
    Transcript of the Registrants August 7, 2007 conference call.99.3
    
    Press release dated August 9, 2007, issued by the Registrant.
I, Qi
Jinjun, certify that:
 
 1.  I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China Dasheng Biotechnology
Company;
  2.  Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this  report;
  3.   Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this  report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
this  report;
  4.  The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small business issuer and
have:
  a)  Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision,  to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this  report is being
prepared;
  b)  Evaluated
the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
  c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal
controls over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s second fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internal
control over financial reporting; and
  5.  The
small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the
small business issuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business
issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
  a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to  adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
  b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls over
financial reporting.
  Date:
      May 20, 2008
              /s/
      Qi Jinjun
 Qi Jinjun, Chief Executive
Officer
 and Chief Financial
Officer