alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 39/16 F

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 39 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4916 February 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 39

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4916 February 2006

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2006/C 039/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |
| 2006/C 039/2 | Commission communication concerning Article 4(3) of Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests, concerning the entities qualified to bring an action under Article 2 of this Directive (1) | 2 |
| 2006/C 039/3 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 39 |
| 2006/C 039/4 | Information procedure — Technical rules (1) | 41 |
| 2006/C 039/5 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 4081 — Fujitsu/Siemens) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1) | 47 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2006/C 039/1

Euro exchange rates

1

2006/C 039/2

Commission communication concerning Article 4(3) of Directive 98/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on injunctions for the protection of consumers' interests, concerning the entities qualified to bring an action under Article 2 of this Directive (1)

2

2006/C 039/3

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

39

2006/C 039/4

Information procedure — Technical rules (1)

41

2006/C 039/5

Prior notification of a concentration (Case COMP/M. 4081 — Fujitsu/Siemens) — Candidate case for simplified procedure (1)

47

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certification.


  I, John Isbrandtsen, certify that:

  1.I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
    required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
    Form 10-K of Sequoia Mortgage Trust 2012-3 (the "Exchange Act periodic
    reports");

  2.Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
    whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
    to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
    light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

  3.Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
    information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period
    covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

  4.Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required
    in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
    disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have
    fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all
    material respects; and

  5.All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
    for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
    assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
    securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
    Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18
    have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
    disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance
    described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
    10-K.

    In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
    information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:
    Cenlar, FSB as Servicer, First Republic Bank as Servicer, PHH Mortgage
    Corporation as Servicer, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. as Custodian and Wells
    Fargo Bank, N.A. as Master Servicer and Securities Administrator.

    Dated:   March 29, 2013


    /s/ John Isbrandtsen
    Signature

    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
    (senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
##### 



AMENDED AND RESTATED
CYBERONICS, INC.
NEW EMPLOYEE EQUITY INDUCEMENT PLAN
 Purposes of the Plan
 Definitions
 Administrator
 Applicable Laws
 Awards
 Award Agreement
 Board
 Bonus Shares
 Code
 Common Stock
 Company
 Compensation Committee
 Disability
 Exchange Act
 Fair Market Value




---



##### 



The Wall Street Journal
 The Wall Street Journal
  Grantee
 Notice of Grant
 Option
 Optioned Stock
 Optionee
 Parent
 Plan
 Restricted Stock
 Rule 16b-3
 Section 16(b)
 Service Provider
 -2-




---



##### 



Share
 Subsidiary
 Stock Subject to the Plan
  Administration of the Plan
 Procedure
 Administrative Bodies
 Rule 16b-3
 Powers of the Administrator
      -3-




---



##### 



Effect of Administrators Decision
 Eligibility
 Award Limitations
   -4-




---



##### 



Term of Plan
 Term of Awards
 Option Exercise Price and Consideration
 Exercise Price
   Waiting Period and Exercise Dates
 Form of Consideration
   -5-




---



##### 



Exercise of Option
 Procedure for Exercise; Rights as a Shareholder
   Termination of Relationship as a Service Provider
 -6-




---



##### 



Disability of Optionee
 Death of Optionee
 Restricted Stock
 Grant
 Forfeiture Restrictions To Be Established by the Administrator
 -7-




---



##### 



Other Terms and Conditions
 Payment for Restricted Stock
 Administrators Discretion to Accelerate Vesting of Restricted Stock Awards
 Bonus Shares
 Nontransferability of Awards
 Adjustments Upon Changes in Capitalization, Dissolution, Merger or Asset Sale
 Changes in Capitalization
 -8-




---



##### 



Change of Control
    -9-




---



##### 



Date of Grant
 Amendment and Termination of the Plan
 Amendment and Termination
 Shareholder Approval
 Effect of Amendment or Termination
 Conditions Upon Issuance of Shares
 Legal Compliance
 Investment Representations
 -10-




---



##### 



Inability to Obtain Authority
 Reservation of Shares
 No Enhancement of Outstanding Options
 -11-
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3262 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

FEBRUARY 10, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

AN ACT 

To provide for the conveyance of land of the Illiana Health 

Care System of the Department of Veterans Affairs in 

Danville, Illinois. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3262 RFS

1 SECTION 1. LAND CONVEYANCE, DANVILLE, ILLINOIS. 

2 (a) CONVEYANCE AUTHORIZED.—The Secretary of 

3 Veterans Affairs may convey to the Danville Area Commu4 nity College of Danville, Illinois, all right, title, and inter5 est of the United States in and to certain real property, 

6 including any improvements thereon, consisting of ap7 proximately .6 acres known as ‘‘Building Number 48’’, 

8 which is part of the Illiana Health Care System of the 

9 Department of Veterans Affairs. 

10 (b) CONSIDERATION.—As consideration for the con11 veyance under subsection (a), the Danville Area Commu12 nity College shall convey to the United States all right, 

13 title, and interest of Danville Area Community College in 

14 and to certain real property, including any improvements 

15 thereon, consisting of approximately 1.06 acres with a ga16 zebo located approximately 293 feet south of the Danville 

17 Area Community College Library Building, which is part 

18 of the Danville Area Community College. 

19 (c) CONDITION OF CONVEYANCE.—The conveyance 

20 under subsection (a) shall be subject to the condition that 

21 the recipient accept the conveyed real property in its con22 dition at the time of the conveyance. 

23 (d) DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.—The exact acreage 

24 and legal description of the parcels of real property con25 veyed under subsections (a) and (b) shall be determined 

26 by surveys satisfactory to the Secretary. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3262 RFS

1 (e) ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS.—The 

2 Secretary may require such additional terms and condi3 tions in connection with the conveyances under subsections 

4 (a) and (b) as the Secretary considers appropriate to pro5 tect the interests of the United States. 

Passed the House of Representatives February 9, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 04-401 Date: July 16, 2004 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Open Season: 

2004 Rider Information

Each year Federal employees access Open Season material in great numbers from the FEHB website. 

The website provides a quick and easy path to Guides, plan brochures, and tools to compare cost, 

benefits and quality indicators for each FEHB plan. With the expanded use of the website, the 

distribution of printed FEHB Guides is at the written request of the agencies. 

Agencies may purchase FEHB Guides through a Government Printing Office (GPO) print rider. 

Attached is FEHB Open Season 2004 RIDER INFO available through regular printing officer channels. 

 Agencies may order the publication on the attached list by riding the U.S. Office of Personnel 

Management’s requisition. Field and regional offices should submit their requirements to their 

department or agency Washington, DC area headquarters printing office before September 2, 2004. In 

order to provide products to our customers on a timely basis, this cutoff date will not be extended. 

Products will be shipped to agency distribution points beginning October 12, 2004. 

Attachment 

 

 Frank D. Titus

 Assistant Director

 for Insurance Services
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 3, 2024.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D24-809

Lower Tribunal No. F83-28927A

Ricardo Valdez,

Appellant, 

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Teresa Pooler, Judge.

Ricardo Valdez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
**CERTIFICATION**Re: **Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C5, Commercial****Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2012-C5**(the "Transaction"), issued pursuant to the  Pooling  and  Servicing  Agreement  dated  as  of  July  1,  2012  (the  "Pooling  and  Servicing Agreement"),  executed  in  connection  with  the  Transaction  (capitalized  terms  used  but  not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement). __________________________________________ I, Kevin Ng, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Morgan Stanley Bank of America Merrill Lynch Trust 2012-C5 (the "Exchange Act periodic reports"); 2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;  4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement(s) required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports,  the  servicers  have  fulfilled  their  obligations  under  the  servicing  agreement(s)  in  all material respects; and 5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report.  Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.   In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: •  U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee and certificate administrator •  Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as custodian •  KeyBank National Association, as master servicer •  Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as    special servicer and as primary servicer •  Situs Holdings, LLC, as trust advisor •  Berkadia Commercial Mortgage LLC, as a sub-servicer 2 Date:  March 25, 2015 By /s/ Kevin Ng       Name: Kevin Ng       Title: President (senior officer in charge of securitization of the Depositor)
#### TANCE v. STATE.

No. 17936.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1936.

Rehearing Denied April 22, 1936.

George H. Cavanagh and L. C. Owens, both of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, death.

*431It was charged in the indictment, in substance, that appellant, with malice aforethought, killed S. M. Roberts by striking and beating him with a piece of iron pipe.

Deceased was night watchman at a cotton compress in the city of Houston. On going to work on the night of February 11, 1934, he carried his pistol, watch, and chain. Early the following morning the watchman who relieved him found him in a dying condition. His skull had been crushed and there were other wounds on his head. An iron pipe about 31⁄2 feet long was near his body. Blood and strands of hair on said pipe indicated that it had been used in assaulting deceased. His pistol, watch, and chain were gone. The following day appellant sold deceased’s pistol to Sidney Yates and his watch to A. R. Brashier. Deceased’s watch chain was found in appellant’s sweater. The state introduced in. evidence appellant’s confession in which he fully admitted his guilt.

Appellant introduced testimony tending to show that he had been whipped by the officers before making a confession. Testifying for the state, said officers denied that appellant had been whipped or mistreated in any way. In short, their testimony was to the effect that the confession was voluntarily made. In this situation the trial ’ court properly submitted the issue to the jury. Appellant’s objection to the introduction of the confession was properly overruled.

The statement at the head of the confession embraced the warning required by the statute (Code Cr.Proc.1925, art. 727). The officer who took the confession testified that he gave said warning to appellant. Under the circumstances, appellant’s objection to the introduction of the confession on the ground that it was not shown that he had been warned was properly overruled.

A careful examination of the record leads us to the conclusion that error is not presented.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Motion for Rehearing.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

We have re-examined the record in the light of the motion for rehearing. In the motion the soundness of the conclusion stated is challenged upon the same.grounds and the same facts as were before the court on the original hearing. A restatement of the matter in detail is not regarded necessary. Suffice it to say that it is the opinion of the court that the matters complained of present no reversible error, and that the disposition made of them in the original opinion was proper.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.
EX-10.2



 EXHIBIT 10.2 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO LICENSE AGREEMENT 

This Second Amendment to the License Agreement (the “Second Amendment”) is dated September 19, 2017 and amends the License
Agreement dated January 8, 2016 (the “Agreement”), as amended, by and between ABT Holding Company (“ATHX”), a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business at 3201 Carnegie Avenue,
Cleveland, OH 44115 and wholly-owned subsidiary of Athersys, Inc. (“Athersys”), and HEALIOS, K.K. (“Healios”), a Japanese company having its principal place of business at World Trade Center Bldg. 15F,
2-4-1 Hamamatsucho, Minato-ku, Tokyo 105-6115 Japan. All defined terms used but not
defined in this Second Amendment shall have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement. 
 WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into the Agreement,
under the terms and conditions of which the Parties continue to perform; and 
 WHEREAS, the Parties wish to amend a certain provision of the
Agreement in connection with execution of the Manufacturing Technology Transfer Agreement, dated September 26, 2017. 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in
consideration of the above premises and the mutual promises set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 

1. Section 2.2 (f) shall be added as follows: 
 (f)
    ATHX is acquired by a non-Affiliated third party, and such license grant shall become effective simultaneously with such acquisition. 

Upon execution of this Second Amendment by the Parties, this Second Amendment shall be made a part of and shall be incorporated by reference into the
Agreement. All terms and conditions of the Agreement not amended herby shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified by the Parties. 

[SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Second Amendment to be executed by their duly authorized
representatives. 
  

									
	HEALIOS K.K.	 		 	ABT HOLDING COMPANY
					
	Signature:	 	 /s/ Hardy TS Kagimoto
	 		 	Signature:	 	 /s/ William O. Lehmann

	Name:	 	Hardy TS Kagimoto	 		 	Name:	 	William O. Lehmann, Jr.
	Title:	 	President & CEO	 		 	Title:	 	President
	Date:	 	September 25, 2017	 		 	Date:	 	September 26, 2017
Exhibit



Exhibit 10.1







August 3, 2017
Mr. Alan Musso
3838 N. Braeswood, Unit 337
Houston, Texas 77025


Re:  Retention Bonus


Dear Alan,
On behalf of Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), this letter is an offer to you of a  
one-time lump sum cash bonus equivalent to six months of your current base salary ($192,500.00), less required withholdings, as set forth below (the “Service Date Bonus”).  You may accept this proposal by signing in the space provided below and returning the signed letter to me.  This letter agreement will be effective on the date you sign below where indicated.


You will be eligible to receive the Service Date Bonus, provided that the following conditions are met:  (i) you remain in the continuous employment of the Company through April 30, 2018 (the “Service Date”); and (ii) you have not given the Company notice of your intent to resign your employment prior to the Service Date.  You shall also be eligible to receive the Service Date Bonus in the event that the Company provides you notice of the termination of your employment (or notice of its intent to terminate your employment) on or before the Service Date for reasons other than Cause as defined in section 6(c) of your Employment Agreement (as defined below).  For the avoidance of doubt, termination by the Company for Cause prior to the Service Date will disqualify you from earning the Service Date Bonus.  You shall be required to provide the Release specified in the Section 7(d) of your Employment Agreement with the Company, dated as of December 4, 2014 (the “Employment Agreement”), in order to be eligible for a Service Date Bonus based upon a Termination without Cause.  


The Service Date Bonus shall be paid to you on the applicable of the following dates: (i) the Company’s first regularly scheduled payroll date following the Service Date; or (ii) if payable as a consequence of a Termination without Cause, the Company’s first regularly scheduled payroll date following the effective date of the Release.  The Service Date Bonus shall be in addition to any other payment or benefit required under the Employment Agreement, if any.  


The Service Date Bonus described herein does not affect any of the terms or provisions of your Employment Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect.















Alan, I trust you are pleased by this offer and I want you to know that I, and the rest of your team, value your expertise and guidance.
Yours truly,
Bellicum Pharmaceuticals, Inc.




/s/ Richard A. Fair    
Richard A. Fair,
President & Chief Executive Officer




Accepted and Agreed: 


/s/ Alan A. Musso    
Alan A. Musso 


Dated:  August 3    , 2017
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 08-303 Date: June 2008 

Subject: FEHBP Cost Factor for Third Quarter of FY 2008 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program (FEHBP) for the third quarter of FY 2008. The annual imputed cost factors for all civilian 

benefit programs will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2008. 

The FEHBP cost factor for the third quarter of FY 2008 is $1,316. 

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. Additionally, you may contact us on 202-606-0606. 

Keith Willingham 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Center for Financial Services
#### Sidney ADAMI, Jr., Alias Sidney Adams, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20755.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 18, 1939.

McLean *&*Daly, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Upon appellant’s plea of guilty of the offense of burglary, and the waiver of a trial by jury, the court assessed his penalty at six years confinement in the penitentiary.

The appellant has filed an affidavit to dismiss this appeal, duly verified as required by law. The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal ordered dismissed.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
     PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B) AND 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of The Meridian Resource
Corporation (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form 10-Q"), I,
Joseph A. Reeves, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1.   The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
     15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: May 10, 2007


                                        /s/ Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Joseph A. Reeves, Jr.
                                        Chief Executive Officer