alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. J OS E R I C O- C AR R I L L O, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50355 D . C . N o . 3 : 0 8 - c r - 0 0 3 6 3 - D MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia D a naM . S abr a w , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d J une 29, 2010 ** B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , L E A V Y , an d G R A B E R , C i rcu i tJu d g es. J os e R i c o- C a rr i l l o appe a l s f r om the 57- m onth s e nt e nc e i m pos e d f ol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty - pl e ac onvi c t i on f ora tt e m pt e d e ntrya f

t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326, a nd m a ki ng af a l s e c l a i m t o U ni t e d S t a t e s c i t i z e ns hi p, i n vi ol a t i on o f 1 8 U . S. C. § 9 1 1 . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED JU L 22 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50355 2 R i c o- C a r i l l o c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtpr oc e dur a l l ye rr e d a ts e nt e nc i ng by fa i l i ng t o exp l i ci t l y a dd re ss hi s argum entthatthe 16 -l evel cr i m e of vi ol ence e nha nc e m e ntunde rthe S e nt e nc i ng G ui de l i ne s r e f l e c t s uns ound pol i c ybythe S e nt e nc i ng C om m i s s i on be c aus e i ti s nott i e d bye m pi r i c a l r e s e a r c h t o a nyf a c t or r e l e va ntt o s e nt e nc i ng. T he r e c or d r e f l e c t s tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourtc ons i de r e d R i c oC a rr illo ’s a r g u m e n ts a n d d id n o t p r o c e d u r a llye rr . Se e U n ite d S ta te s v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 98 4, 99 2-93 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc). AF F I RME D.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80581]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22834]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4768-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]


Oregon; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration 
for the State of Oregon (FEMA-4768-DR), dated April 13, 2024, and 
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on August 30, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and 
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency 
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the 
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Yolanda J. 
Jackson disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Catharine O. Fan as 
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers 
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, 
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis 
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster 
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance 
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and 
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, 
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing 
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially 
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other 
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially 
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2024-22834 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 32.1.1

CERTIFICATION

I, W. W.
Boisture, Jr., principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. W. Boisture, Jr.                                     
|W. W. Boisture, Jr., President (Principal Executive Officer)

May 5, 2011
Exactly how Easy is 

saving monEy with an fsa? 

That’s right...it’s as easy as pie! Get the Fed-friendly tax break on your 

health care and dependent care expenses. Enroll in FSAFEDS during Open Season, 

November 10 to December 8, 2014 at www.FSAFEDS.com. 

PUt moRE monEy in yoUR PocKEt! 

1-877-FSAFEDS (372-3337) | TTY: 1-800-952-0450
Order entered November 14 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05 - 13 - 00397 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00399 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00406 - CR No. 05 - 13 - 00407 - CR OCTAVIOUS JAMES JACK SON, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 363rd Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No s . F08 - 20340 - W , F08 - 20341 - W, F12 - 70580 - W, F12 - 70581 - W 

### O RDER In his brief, appellant raises issues related to the costs assessed against him. The records, however, do not contai n cost bills or other documents with itemized lists of costs assessed in the

cases. Accordingly, we ORDER the Dallas County District Clerk to file, within FIFTEEN DAYS of the date of this order, supplemental clerk’s records containing detailed itemizations of the costs assessed in these cases, including but not limited to, specific court costs, fees, and court appointed attorney fees. In accordance with Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 103.001, the cost bill s shall be signed by the officer who char ged the cost s or the officer who is entitled toreceive payment for the cost s . We further ORDER that the supplemental clerk’s records include

documents explaining any and all abbreviations used to designate a particular fee, cost, or court appointed attor ney fee. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal Records Division; and to counsel for all parties.

/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

 

Number: 05-403 Date: August 3, 2005 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Open Season 2005 Rider 

Information

Attached is the August 2005 FEHB Open Season Rider. Your agency also should receive the rider 

through regular printing officer channels. Agencies may order the publications on the attached list by 

riding the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's requisition. Field and regional offices should 

submit your requirements to your department or agency Washington, DC, area headquarters printing 

office before the September 6, 2005, cutoff date. The headquarters office must submit the 

consolidated requisitions to the U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO) by COB September 6, 2005. 

In order to provide products to our customers on a timely basis, this cutoff date will not be extended. 

Products will be shipped to agency distribution points beginning October 11, 2005. 

If you are the headquarters agency and you do not know which customer service team at GPO is 

assigned to your agency, please call GPO on (202) 512-0111 or use the following link for information: 

http://www.gpo.gov/customerservices/aps.htm. 

Attachment 

 Stephen C. Benowitz 

 Associate Director 

for Human Resources Products and 

Services
# Official Journal C 15/2005

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 15 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4820 January 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 15

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4820 January 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2005/C 015/1 | Special report No 5/2004 concerning Phare support to prepare Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds, together with the Commission’s replies | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2005/C 015/1

Special report No 5/2004 concerning Phare support to prepare Candidate Countries for managing the Structural Funds, together with the Commission’s replies

1

---

| | Corrigenda |
| --- | --- |
| 2005/C 015/2 | Corrigenda | 28 |

Corrigenda

2005/C 015/2

Corrigenda

28

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of Iris BioTechnologies, Inc. (the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Simon Chin, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that:

 

(1)           The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)           The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Reportpursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes ofSection 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is notto be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether madebefore or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporationlanguage in such filing.

 

 
| Date:  November 15, 2010 | By:    |                                                                        |
|-------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | /s/  Simon Chin                                                             |
|                          |   | Simon  Chin  President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Approved Factors, Appellant, *v.*Imperial Bolt *&*Screw Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department,

January 23, 1958.

*Julius E. Bregman*and *Sidney M. Gross*for appellant.

*Bennett I. Schlessel*for respondent.

*Per Curiam.*

We conclude Mr. Mont’s alleged identification of Silverman’s voice heard more than eight months before he heard it in the courtroom when Silverman testified at the trial is not convincing and is against the weight of credible evidence. Since this is the only evidence touching on the question of whether or not plaintiff had notice that the note was given for the accommodation of Broadway Metals, plaintiff is in the position of a holder in due course and may recover on a corporate accommodation note. Moreover, the note is not *ultra vires*as it was given for defendant’s own protection (see *Brockport Nat. Bank*v. *Webaco Oil Co.,*257 App. Div. 68).

The judgment and order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in the complaint, with costs.

Heoht, J. P., Aurelio and Tilzer, JJ., concur.

Judgment and order reversed, etc.
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Group

1920 1954 1959 1986 

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 96-414 Date: November 4, 1996 

SUBJECT: 1996 FEHB Open Season: Withdrawal of Family Health Plan

This is to inform you that Family Health Plan (code 1F) is withdrawing from the FEHB

Program effective December 31, 1996. Unfortunately, the FEHB Guides had already gone

to print when the plan made its decision to withdraw, so the plan's name appears in the

Guides. Family Health Plan services the Ohio counties of Defiance, Fulton, Henry, Lucas,

Ottawa, Sandusky, and Wood, as well as Monroe County, Michigan. 

The plan will send notices of its withdrawal to its enrollees. However, it is important to

remember that enrollees in the plan who fail to choose another plan during open season will

have no health benefits for 1997. Consequently, if you have employees in the areas served

by the plan, we ask that you notify them directly of the plan's withdrawal.

Thank you for your assistance.

 Abby L. Block, Chief

 Insurance Policy and 

 Information Division
#### Irwin Tuck et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*Hattie G. Tuck et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

December 17, 1957.

*810
      *Raphael $ B'o'rman*for Hattie G-. Túck and another, defendants.

*Joseph Benisch*for plaintiffs.

Miles F. McDonald, J.

In this action to impress a trust and for an accounting, defendants Tuck move to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it fails to set forth strong and compelling reasons why the litigation should not be determined in the appropriate Surrogate’s Court; aind on the further ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same cause.

An examination of the pleading reveals that the plaintiffs have properly pleaded a cause of action to establish a constructive trust, predicated upon the fiduciary relationship of the deceased and the defendant Hattie Tuck *(Beatty*v. *Guggenheim Exploration Co.,*225 N. Y. 380; *Foreman*v. *Foreman,*251 N. Y. 237).

This action to impress a trust does not fall within the class of actions which may be said to come within ‘ ‘ the specialized jurisdiction of the Surrogate’s Court ” as set forth in *Noll*v. *Ruprecht*(256 App. Div. 926, affd. 282 N. Y. 598) and, consequently, does not require the plaintiffs to specially plead jurisdictional facts and may not be dismissed for failure to do so. However, while this court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the complaint is sufficient in law, it is the policy of the Supreme Court of this State, unless special facts and circumstances require, to concentrate in the Surrogate’s Court all matters affecting the administration of a decedent’s estate where the court has complete power to safeguard the interests of the parties *(Noll*v. *Ruprecht, supra; Matter of Ranft,*268 App. Div. 136; *Matter of Smith,*120 App. Div. 199). The jurisdiction of the Surrogate’s Court is broad enough to include actions in equity such as the instant case *(Matter of Shearn,*154 *N.*Y. S. 2d 485; *Matter of Barletta,*2 Misc 2d 135).

It further appears that the subject matter of this action and the identity thereof as well as some of the parties are not the same as those in the Surrogate’s Court proceeding.

Accordingly, the motion to dismiss must be denied. Nevertheless under the prayer for such other and further relief, etc., the court directs a transfer of this action to the Surrogate’s Court pursuant to the provisions of section 40 of the Surrogate’s Court Act, conditioned upon the entry of an order by the learned Surrogate accepting such transfer as required by said section. *811Should, the learned Surrogate refuse to accept such transfer the motion is denied. The order to he entered herein shall await the action of the learned Surrogate. If no action is taken within 20 days an order may be entered herein denying said motion. Settle order on notice.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed May 19, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D20-1890

Lower Tribunal Nos. F14-22398 & F14-22399

________________

Steve Austin Jr.,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jose L. Fernandez, Judge.

Steve Austin, Jr., in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, SCALES, and LOBREE, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-41281 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus
ANCELMO CORONADO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-201-1

- - - - - - - - - - June 17, 1999 Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *Ancelmo Coronado-Martinez (Coronado), appeals his guiltyplea conviction for illegal reentry into the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b). Coronado argues that the district court erred by applying the 16-level increase pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b) because he had been previously deported subsequent to an aggravated-felonyNo. 98-41281 -2- conviction for possession of marijuana. Coronado failed to raise

an objection at sentencing on this issue; therefore, this issue is reviewed solely for plain error. Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b); United States v. Rodriguez , 15 F.3d 408, 414-15 (5th Cir. 1994); United States v. Olano , 507 U.S. 725, 731-37 (1993). His arguments regarding this issue are precluded by our decision in United States v. Hinojosa-Lopez , 130 F.3d 691 (5th Cir. 1997). This issue is without arguable merit and frivolous. The appeal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR . R. 42.2.
Attachment 2 

Currently, when there is a change in family members under a Self and Family enrollment, the 

enrollee advises the FEHB plan directly. OPM is considering transmitting family member changes to 

the FEHB plans electronically, both for Self Plus One and Self and Family enrollments. 

To help OPM make a determination, please answer the following questions: 

 Does your self-service enrollment system currently accommodate the entry of all family 

members under a Self and Family enrollment? 

 What programming changes are necessary to gather from the enrollee and transmit to the 

OPM-Macon data-hub a change in family members (the enrollment code does not change)? 

 If OPM decides to implement this change, would it be better time wise and cost wise for you to 

implement the same time as you make changes for Self Plus One or afterwards? 

 Can any necessary changes be completed prior to the 2015 Open Season? If not, when could the 

changes be made? 

 What is the projected cost impact?
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 97-408 Date: October 17, 1997 

Subject: 1997 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Open Season:

FEHB Guide Shipment Delay 

This is to advise you that, due to production problems, shipment of the 1998 Guide to Federal

Employees Health Benefits Plans for Federal Civilian Employees (RI 70-1), will be delayed by

as much as five days. The Guides for individuals covered under temporary continuation of

coverage (TCC) and spouse equity coverage (RI 70-5), and for temporary employees (RI 70-8)

will be similarly delayed.

If you do not get your order of these Guides by October 29, 1997, please contact our Forms

Analysis and Design office on 202-606-0623, or email them at RISFORMS@opm.gov.

These delays will not require an extension of Open Season. However, if circumstances arise

that prevent individuals from making timely Open Season changes, remember that agencies

have the authority to permit belated changes in individual cases.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

and Information Division
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 00-703 Date: September 12, 2000 

Subject: Modernizing Today – The Voice of the Retirement Systems Modernization Effort 

Modernizing Today is a bulletin that is published several times a year by the Retirement Systems 

Modernization Communication Committee. The purpose of Modernizing Today is to share 

information on the vision and progress of the modernization effort, and to provide insight into 

the benefits that employees, retirees and their families and administrators of the retirement 

programs can expect to see. 

Retirement Systems Modernization is OPM’s central strategy to meet its long term customer 

service, financial management and business goals for the retirement program. The 

modernization will occur over a number of years, in phases, and will dramatically change the 

business processes and technologies currently in place. It will affect HR and payroll office staff 

throughout the Federal government, the employees who administer the program at OPM and the 

over 5 million employees and retirees who are members of the program. 

Modernizing Today is available on the OPM web site. If you want to see what modernization is 

all about and view the most recent edition, please visit us at: 

http://www.opm.gov/retire/modern/v2issue2.pdf

If you would like to access previous issues of Modernizing Today or other information about the 

Retirement Systems Modernization, please visit us at: http://www.opm.gov/retire/modern

 Lorraine E. Dettman, Chief 

 Business Systems Reengineering Division 

 Retirement and Insurance Service 

Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees 

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement 

System Insurance Program System