alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
lksd-ex1019_919.htm



 

                                                                                                                                  Exhibit 10.19

LSC Communications, Inc.
Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan 

Each director shall receive (A) an annual cash retainer (a “Cash Retainer”) and (B) an annual equity retainer (an “Equity Retainer”) to be paid in the form of a grant of Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”) each on the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, as described further below and pursuant to the Company’s Performance Incentive Plan in effect on such date (the “Plan”).   


	
1)
	
Cash Retainer.  
	
 





	
 
	
a)
	
Each director shall be entitled to a Cash Retainer equal to $90,000.
	
 





	
 
	
b)
	
Any director in a leadership role shall be entitled to an additional Cash Retainer in the applicable amount described in the table below:  
	
 




 


		
	
Lead Director
	
$62,500

	
Chairman of the Audit Committee
	
$25,000

	
Chairman of the Human Resources Committee
	
$25,000

	
Chairman of the Corporate Responsibility & Governance Committee
	
$20,000




 


	
2)
	
Equity Retainer.
	
 





	
 
	
a)
	
Each director shall be entitled to an Equity Retainer equal to $135,000.
	
 





	
 
	
b)
	
The Lead Director shall be entitled to an additional Equity Retainer equal to $62,500.    
	
 





	
 
	
c)
	
The number of shares granted shall be calculated pursuant to the terms of the Plan and shall be rounded down to the nearest share.
	
 





	
 
	
d)
	
RSUs will vest and be payable on the first anniversary of the grant date, but will be payable in full on the earlier of (i) the date the director ceases to be a Director of the Company and (ii) a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan). 
	
 





	
 
	
e)
	
Dividend equivalents on the RSUs issued hereunder are deferred, credited with interest quarterly at the same rate as five-year U.S. government bonds and paid out in cash at the same time the corresponding portion of the award becomes payable. 
	
 





	
 
	
f)
	
The Company shall make payment of the RSUs in Company common stock. 
	
 





	
 
	
g)
	
Each director may, subject to any conditions deemed appropriate from time to time by the Human Resources Committee, defer the delivery of the Equity Retainer until the termination of such director’s service on the Board in accordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (including the applicable regulations thereunder) using such deferral election form as approved by the Human Resources Committee from time to time.
	
 




 


	
3)
	
General.
	
 





	
 
	
a)
	
If any director joins the Board on a date other than the date of the Company’s Annual Meeting, then a pro-rata portion of each of the applicable Cash Retainer and Equity Retainer from the date joined to the next Annual Meeting date shall be granted.  
	
 




Effective as of October 26, 2017



 

Each director is expected to comply with the terms of any stock ownership guidelines for non-employee directors that are established by the Company, as in effect from time to time.

 

 

Effective as of October 26, 2017
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 98-407 Date: June 26,1998 

Subject: 1998 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program Open Season:

Electronic Transfer of Enrollment Transactions

Beginning with the upcoming FEHB open season, the Office of Personnel Management (OPM)

will offer electronic transfer of FEHB enrollment transactions from agency systems to health plan

carriers via a data transfer hub at OPM-Macon. Hub service will be available for agencies that do

not participate in Employee Express.

Interested agencies will be responsible for their own costs incurred to set up communications with

OPM-Macon. For this year, there will be no additional cost to agencies for the weekly transfer of

data to Macon and from Macon to the carriers. And unless actual costs are significantly higher

than projected, we intend to continue to provide this service at little or no cost to agency

customers. Since this is a highly beneficial service that is likely to be very popular with Federal

agencies, OPM and the Human Resources Technology Council will monitor the data carefully for

growth, data transfer capacity, and possible improvements.

Each agency that wishes to participate must have a personal computer, modem, telephone line,

and PC-Anywhere communications software to establish a link with OPM-Macon. Once the link

is established and tested, the agency will send electronic FEHB transactions to OPM-Macon in a

predefined file format, on a weekly basis. Agencies must ensure that the data transmission is

correct and complete since Macon will not edit agency data. Upon receipt of the agency data

transfer, Macon will electronically forward the data to the appropriate health carrier.

If you are interested in this new service, please contact Mr. David LeDoux, Employment Service,

at 202-606-4481, or by email at DALEDOUX@opm.gov. OPM will provide your agency with

file layouts, data edits, and processing procedures. 

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy 

and Information Division
##### 



Data & Consulting ServicesDivision of Schlumberger Technology Corporation1310 Commerce Drive
    
    (SCHLUMBERGER LOGO)Park Ridge 1Pittsburgh, PA 15275-1011Tel: 412-787-5403Fax: 412-787-2906
 Consent of Schlumberger Data and Consulting Services
  Schlumberger Data and Consulting Services-s- Charles M. Boyer IIBy: Charles M. Boyer II, P.G.Title: Operations Manager Pittsburgh Consulting Services
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80273]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22709]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 402 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-762, K2024-55.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22709 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# Official Journal L 120/2011

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.120.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 120 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 547 May 2011 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2011.120.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 120

English edition

Legislation

Volume 547 May 2011

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Regulation No 110 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of I. specific components of motor vehicles using compressed natural gas (CNG) in their propulsion system; — II. vehicles with regard to the installation of specific components of an approved type for the use of compressed natural gas (CNG) in their propulsion system | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

ACTS ADOPTED BY BODIES CREATED BY INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Regulation No 110 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) — Uniform provisions concerning the approval of I. specific components of motor vehicles using compressed natural gas (CNG) in their propulsion system; — II. vehicles with regard to the installation of specific components of an approved type for the use of compressed natural gas (CNG) in their propulsion system

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### FRANKFURT v. GRAYSON.

No. 1556.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

Feb. 1, 1934.

J. J. Fagan, of Dallas, for appellant.

Geppert, Geppert & Victery, of Teague, for appellee.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

We find in the transcript of this case a purported judgment overruling a plea of privilege, which judgment purports to have been rendered on September 22, 1933, the last day of that term of court The appellee, in a motion filed to strike the statement of facts, and the appellant in his reply thereto, concede that the purported judgment fomid in the transcript was not entered during the term of court at which the case was tried. The clerk certifies that said judgment was actually filed and entered in the minutes on November 27, 1933, which was after the court had adjourned. There is nothing in the record to' show that the trial court authorized the entry of judgment nunc pro tunc after adjournment of the term.

The general and well-established rule is that, in order to be appealable, a judgment or order must not only be pronounced by the court — that is, rendered — but it must be entered upon the minutes. 3 Tex. Jur. 103; Great Plains Oil & Gas Co. v. Cox (Tex. Civ. App.) 2 S.W.(2d) 567; Shields v. Amicable Life Ins. Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 287 S. W. 293. In fact, there is no way for the appellate court to determine what judgment was actually rendered by the trial court until such judgment has been entered in the minutes.

It is likewise well settled that the entry of a judgment upon the minutes of the court after adjournment of the term without an order of the court authorizing the entry of said judgment nunc pro tunc is a nullity, and that such purported judgment constitutes no part of the record on appeal. In the case of Hubbart v. Willis State Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 119 S. W. 711, 713, it is said: “Clearly no appeal could be prosecuted from a judgment *534rendered, but net entered upon tbe minutes, and yet such appeal must be instituted witbin a limited time from the adjournment of the court. The right of appeal could then be destroyed if it be held that the clerk in vacation could by his entry of the judgment give it as full force and efficiency as though it had been regularly entered while the court was in session. We therefore hold that the entry of the judgment in this case, made after the adjournment of court, was no part of the minutes of the court, and cannot be regarded as furnishing any authority for the issuance of the execution.”

It is therefore apparent that no final judgment has been entered in the trial court and that this court is without jurisdiction of the cause. The appeal is therefore dismissed, but without prejudice to appellant’s right to prosecute a new appeal in the event judgment nunc pro tunc is entered in the trial court. See, in this connection, 3 Tex: Jur. 277.

Appeal dismissed.
# Official Journal L 208/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 208 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5715 July 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 208

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5715 July 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EU) No 752/2014 of 24 June 2014 replacing Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Regulation (EU) No 752/2014 of 24 June 2014 replacing Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# Official Journal C 143/2016

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 143 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5922 April 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 143

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5922 April 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| 2016/C 143/1 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1 | 1 |
| 2016/C 143/2 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office for the financial year 2015 — amending budget No 1 | 6 |
| 2016/C 143/3 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2015 — amending budget No 5 | 10 |
| 2016/C 143/4 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1 | 14 |
| 2016/C 143/5 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1 | 18 |
| 2016/C 143/6 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1 | 21 |
| 2016/C 143/7 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1 | 24 |
| 2016/C 143/8 | Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Single Resolution Board for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 2 | 28 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

2016/C 143/1

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1

1

2016/C 143/2

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Community Plant Variety Office for the financial year 2015 — amending budget No 1

6

2016/C 143/3

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2015 — amending budget No 5

10

2016/C 143/4

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Maritime Safety Agency for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1

14

2016/C 143/5

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the European Railway Agency for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1

18

2016/C 143/6

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Executive Agency for Small and Medium-sized Enterprises for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1

21

2016/C 143/7

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 1

24

2016/C 143/8

Statement of revenue and expenditure of the Single Resolution Board for the financial year 2016 — amending budget No 2

28

---

All amounts in this budget document are expressed in euro unless otherwise indicated.

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7155** 

LONNIE OGLESBEE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v.
TERRY O’ BRIEN, Warden; CAPTAIN WILSON; CAPTAINS JOHNSON; S.I.A. PITT; A.M. SHIFT PRISON GUARDS; WEBB, Special Housing Un it Guard; KEGLEY, Special Housing Unit Guard; C/O HAMILTON, Special Housing Unit Guard; ANDERS, Special Housing Unit Guard; MOORE, Special Housing Unit Guard; MR. FORTNER, Special Housing Unit Guard; STANLEY, Special Housing Unit Guard; JARRELL, Special Ho using Unit Guard; OTHER UNAMED GUARDS, Special Housing Unit; SHREIBER, Special Housing Lieutenant , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Roanoke

. Jackson L. Kiser , Senior Dist rict Judge. ( 7:10

- cv - 00322

- jlk

- mfu )

Submitted : November 4, 2010 Decided: December 27 , 2010

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Vacated and remanded by un published per curiam opinion

.
Lonnie Oglesbee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpubl ished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lonnie Oglesbee appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his civil action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971) , for failure to exhaust administrative

remedies. **∗**

**∗** Generally, dismissals without prejudice are interlocutory and not appealable. Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Unio n 392 , 10 F.3d 1064, 1066 (4th Cir. 1993). However, a dismissal without prejudice could be final if no amendment to the complaint could cure the defect in the plaintiff’s case. Id. at 1066

- 67. We conclude that the defect in this case (the failure to exhaust administrative remedies) can only be cured by something mor e than an amendment to the complaint and that the order is appealable. Because the record contains allegations that prison staff denied Oglesbee grievance forms and retaliated against him for using the administrative grievance process , w e conclude that
the fai lure to exhaust is not clear from the face of the complaint. See Anderson v. XYZ Corr. Health Servs. , 407 F.3d
674, 682

- 83 (4th Cir. 2005) ; see also Moore v. Bennette , 517 F.3d 717, 725 (4th Cir. 2008)

. Accordingly, we vacate the judgment of the district court and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. We deny Oglesbee’s motion to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately3 presented in the materials before the court and arg ument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED
EXHIBIT 11

                   COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                          DECEMBER 31
                                             ---------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 1995           1994          1993         1992           1991
                                             -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------    -----------

<S>                                          <C>            <C>           <C>           <C>            <C>        
(A)   Net Income (Loss)                      $  (581,864)   $   459,290   $   843,479   $   834,705    $   200,652
                                             ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========    ===========

      Weighted Average of
      Common Shares Out-
      standing                                 1,550,685      1,541,670     1,590,653     1,308,037      1,351,864


      Potential Shares
      Attributable to
      Options Outstanding                         38,676        107,976       121,808        57,413          6,722
                                             -----------    -----------   -----------   -----------    -----------

(B)   Weighted Average of Common
      and Common Equivalent
      Shares Outstanding                       1,589,361      1,649,646     1,712,461     1,365,450      1,358,586
                                             ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========    ===========

      Primary Net Income (Loss) Per Common
      Share (A/B)                            $      (.37)   $       .28   $       .49   $       .49*   $       .12*
                                             ===========    ===========   ===========   ===========    ===========

</TABLE>

* Restated to reflect a five-for-four stock split, effected in the form of a 25%
  stock dividend to Shareholders of record on March 19, 1993.
**EXHIBIT 31.A****CERTIFICATION**I, James C. Yardley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Southern Natural Gas Company;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date:February 28, 2007       */s/ James C. Yardley* James C. Yardley    Chairman of the Board and President    (Principal Executive Officer)    Southern Natural Gas Company