### 60391 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

unless it has been inspected following the applicable paragraph of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014.

(1) For airplanes with any parts made of aluminum alloy AA2124–T851: Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, make an entry in the aircraft logbook as required by paragraph 3.D.(3) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014. The only other actions of this AD that apply to airplanes with all parts made of aluminum alloy AA2124–T851 are the actions in paragraphs (f)(3), (f)(4), and (f)(5) of this AD.

(2) For airplanes with any parts made of aluminum alloy AA2024–T351: Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, do the actions in paragraphs (f)(2)(i) through (f)(2)(iii) as applicable, including all subparagraphs:

(i) For items 7 through 9 and 11 through 13 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, do a one-time inspection for cracks. If any cracks are found as a result of the inspection, before further flight, you must contact PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. to obtain FAA-approved repair instructions approved specifically for compliance with this AD and incorporate
those instructions. Use the contact information found in paragraph (h) of this

AD.

(ii) For item 6 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2)
of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51– 001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014,
within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, replace with a part made of aluminum alloy AA2124–T851.

(iii) For Items 1, 2, 4, 5, and 10 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, do the following actions in paragraphs (f)(2)(iii)(A) and (f)(2)(iii)(B), as applicable.

(A) For items 1, 2, 4, and 10 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, do a one-time inspection for cracks. If any cracks are found, before further flight, you must contact PILATUS Aircraft Ltd. to obtain FAA-approved repair instructions approved specifically for compliance with this AD and incorporate
those instructions. Use the contact information found in paragraph (h) of this

AD.

(B) For item 5 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2)
of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51– 001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, replace with a part made of aluminum alloy

AA2124–T851.

(3) For all airplanes: For item 3 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, replace with a part made of aluminum alloy AA2124–T851. You must replace the elevator center control-rods (item 3 as listed in paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014) because it is difficult to inspect them for cracks. (4) For all airplanes: As of 12 months after the effective date of this AD, do not install the parts listed in items 1 and 2, 4, and 7 through 13 of paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, that are made of aluminum alloy AA2024–T351 unless they have been inspected and found free of cracks.

(5) For all airplanes: As of 12 months after the effective date of this AD, do not install the parts listed in items 3, 5, and 6 of paragraph 1.A.(2) of PILATUS PC–7 Service Bulletin No: 51–001, Revision No. 1, dated August 26, 2014, that are made of aluminum alloy AA2024–T351.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

The following provisions also apply to this

AD:

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Doug Rudolph, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329– 4090; email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority (or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.

(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current
valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120–0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance Officer,

AES–200.

(h) Related Information

Refer to Federal Office of Civil Aviation (FOCA) AD HB–2014–001, dated July 25, 2014, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–2014–0770. For service information related to this AD, contact PILATUS AIRCRAFT LTD., Customer Technical Support (MCC), P.O. Box 992, CH– 6371 Stans, Switzerland; phone: +41 (0)41 619 67 74; fax: +41 (0)41 619 67 73; email: Techsupport@pilatus-aircraft.com; Internet: http://www.pilatus-aircraft.com. You may
review this referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.

Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 30, 2014.

Earl Lawrence, Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2014–23880 Filed 10–6–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4910–13–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE**

**Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives** 

**27 CFR Parts 478, 555, and 771**

**[Docket No. ATF 33P; AG Order No. 3469– 2014]** 

**RIN 1140–AA40**

**Rules of Practice in Explosives License and Permit Proceedings**  **(2007R–5P); Revisions Reflecting Changes Consistent With the**  **Homeland Security Act of 2002**

**AGENCY :**  Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), Department of Justice.

**ACTION :**  Notice of proposed rulemaking.

**SUMMARY :**  The Department of Justice proposes to codify the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) procedures and practices in connection with the disapproval of initial applications, denials of renewal, and revocations of explosives licenses or permits. The proposed regulations will be codified in a new part entitled ‘‘Rules and Practice in License and Permit Proceedings.’’ The proposed regulations are based upon the regulations that ATF relied upon prior to its transfer from the Department of the Treasury to the Department of Justice.

Additionally, the Department proposes minor revisions to regulations governing administrative proceedings related to the denial, suspension, or revocation of a license, and the imposition of a civil fine under Federal firearms law to reference regulations under ATF authority. These proposed
revisions remove all references to statutes, regulations, positions, and other terms that are applicable only to the Department of the Treasury. These


### 60392 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

revisions reflect ATF’s position as a regulatory and enforcement agency under the Department of Justice and are consistent with the proposed regulations governing administrative hearing processes for explosives licenses and permits.

**DATES :**  Written comments must be postmarked and electronic comments must be submitted on or before January 5, 2015. Commenters should be aware
that the electronic Federal Docket Management System will not accept comments after midnight Eastern Time on the last day of the comment period.

**ADDRESSES :**  Send comments, identified by docket number (ATF 33P), by any of the following methods:

• Mail: Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs and Services, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Mailstop 6N–602, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226; ATTN:

ATF 33P. Written comments must appear in minimum 12-point font size (.17 inches), include the sender’s mailing address, and be signed; they may be of any length.

• Fax: 202–648–9741.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments received will be posted without change to the Federal eRulemaking portal, http:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. For detailed instructions on submitting
comments and additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ‘‘Public Participation’’ heading of the

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION** section of
this document.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs and Services, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice, 99 New York Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648–7070.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. Background

The Attorney General has delegated to the Director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) responsibility for administering and enforcing title I of the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA), Public Law 90–618, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Chapter 44, relating to commerce in firearms and ammunition; and Title XI, Regulation of Explosives, of the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 (OCCA), Public Law 91–452, as amended, 18 U.S.C. Chapter

40. See 18 U.S.C. 926(a); 18 U.S.C. 843; 28 CFR 0.130. Under the GCA, ATF has the authority to license applicants, renew licenses, and revoke Federal firearms licenses. The OCCA, as amended by the Safe Explosives Act, Title XI, Subtitle C of Public Law 107– 296, the Homeland Security Act of 2002 (enacted November 25, 2002), authorizes ATF to provide licenses and permits to qualified applicants for the acquisition, distribution, storage, or use of explosive materials and renew or revoke such licenses and permits.

A. Rules of Practice in Permit Proceedings (27 CFR Part 71)

On November 25, 2002, President George W. Bush signed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, Public Law 107– 296 (the Act), which divided the regulatory functions of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms into two separate agencies. The Act renamed the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms as the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives and
transferred law enforcement and certain regulatory functions to the Department of Justice. The Act also retained in the Department of the Treasury (Treasury)
certain functions of the former Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms. The functions retained by Treasury became the responsibility of a new Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB).

As a result of the Act, TTB has all regulatory authority under 27 CFR Part
71 and ATF therefore cannot promulgate new regulations under this part, although ATF uses the regulations in Part 71 to administer hearings related to the application and revocation of Federal explosives licenses and permits.

B. License Proceedings (27 CFR Part 478)

Regulations that implement the provisions of the GCA are set forth in 27 CFR Part 478. Subpart E of Part 478 relates to proceedings involving Federal firearms licensees, including the denial, suspension, or revocation of licenses and the imposition of civil fines. Specifically, 27 CFR 478.76 provides that an applicant or licensee may be represented at a hearing for the disapproval of applications for firearms licenses, for the denial, suspension, or revocation of a firearms license, or for imposition of a civil fine under federal firearms law by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person recognized to practice before ATF as provided in 31 CFR Part 8, if the representative complies with the applicable practice requirements of 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527.

C. License and Permit Proceedings (27 CFR Part 555)

The regulations that implement OCCA procedural and substantive requirements are found in 27 CFR Part 555. Subpart E of Part 555 relates to proceedings involving Federal explosives licensees and permittees, including the denial of an initial application, denial of a renewal, and revocation of a license or permit. Specifically, 27 CFR 555.78 provides that an applicant, licensee, or permittee may be represented at a hearing for the disapproval of applications for explosives licenses, and for the denial of
renewal or revocation of such licenses or permits under federal explosives law by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person recognized to practice before ATF as provided in 31 CFR Part 8, if the representative complies with the applicable practice requirements of 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527.

II. Proposed Rule

A. Creation of new 27 CFR Part 771

The Department proposes revising ATF regulations to add a new part that implements 18 U.S.C. 843 and 847 relating to the procedures and practice for the disapproval of initial applications, denials of a renewal, and revocations of explosives licenses or permits by ATF under federal explosives law. ATF is incorporating and updating the language relevant to its operations currently found in Part 71 into proposed 27 CFR Part 771. The creation of Part 771 is primarily an administrative change that will improve the organization of ATF regulations. The proposed regulations will be codified in a new part 771 in Chapter II of title 27 CFR and are separated into subparts as
follows:

Subpart A—Scope and Construction Subpart B—Definitions Subpart C—General Subpart D—Compliance and Settlement Subpart E—Grounds for Revocation or Denial Subpart F—Hearing Procedure Subpart G—Administrative Law Judges Subpart H—Decisions Subpart I—Review Subpart J—Miscellaneous

B. Proposed Amendments to 27 CFR

Part 478

This proposed rule amends ATF regulations governing procedures and practices for disapproving applications for firearms licenses; for denying, suspending, or revoking a firearms license; and for imposing a civil fine


### 60393 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

under federal firearms law. The proposed rule revises 27 CFR 478.76 to allow an applicant or licensee to be represented at a proceeding by himself, an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person without submitting a declaration of a representative pursuant to 26 CFR 601.521, and it deletes the current
references to 31 CFR Part 8 and 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527. Under the proposed rule, an applicant or licensee shall file in the proceeding a duly executed power of attorney designating his representative. The applicant or licensee shall also file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 (see 5 U.S.C. 552a), and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings under §§ 478.72 and 478.74 by an attorney for the government in the ATF Office of
Chief Counsel who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding on behalf of the Director of Industry Operations in the attorney’s own name as ‘‘Attorney
for the Government.’’

C. Proposed Amendments to 27 CFR

Part 555

This proposed rule amends ATF regulations governing procedures and practices for disapproving applications, denying renewals, and revoking explosives licenses or permits under federal explosives law. This proposed rule amends § 555.73 and § 555.73 to state that the administrative hearings
will be conducted in accordance with the hearing procedures prescribed in part 771, thereby replacing the current references in these sections to part 71.

The proposed rule revises 27 CFR 555.78 to allow an applicant, licensee, or permittee to be represented at a proceeding by himself, an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person without submitting a declaration of a representative pursuant to 26 CFR 601.521, and it deletes the current
references to 31 CFR Part 8 and 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527. Under the proposed rule, an applicant, licensee, or permittee shall file in the proceeding a duly executed power of attorney designating his representative. The applicant, licensee, or permittee shall also file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 (see 5 U.S.C. 552(a)) and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). An attorney for the government may represent the Director of Industry Operations under §§ 555.73 and 555.75
who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding, on behalf of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney’s own name as ‘‘Attorney for the

Government.’’

This proposed rule amends § 555.79 to state that, in the event that an appeal is taken from a decision of a hearing, the process by which the Director will review the complete original record will be contained in a new part 771, thereby replacing the current reference in this section to part 71.

This proposed rule revises § 555.82 to state that regulations governing the procedures and practices for disapproving applications for explosives licenses and permits and for denying renewal of or revoking such licenses and permits are contained in a new Part

771.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866 and 13563

This proposed rule has been drafted
and reviewed in accordance with Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ section 1(b), The Principles of Regulation and in accordance with Executive Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,’’ section 1, General Principles of Regulation, and section 6, Retrospective Analyses of Existing
Rules.

Further, both Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. The Department has assessed the costs and benefits of this regulation and believes that the regulatory approach selected
maximizes net benefits.

This rule will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more, nor will it adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal government or communities. Similarly,
it does not create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency, materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof, or raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in Executive Order 12866.

Section 6 of Executive Order 13563, directs agencies to develop a plan to review existing significant rules that may be ‘‘outmoded, ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome,’’ and to make appropriate changes where warranted. The Department selected and reviewed this
rule under the criteria set forth in its Plan for Retrospective Analysis of Existing Rules, and determined that this proposed rule transfers and consolidates regulations governing explosives license application renewal or revocation of licenses and permits, improving the enforcement of ATF regulations.

B. Executive Order 13132

This proposed regulation will not
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in
accordance with section 6 of Executive Order 13132, the Attorney General has determined that this proposed regulation does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement.

C. Executive Order 12988

This proposed rule meets the applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, ‘‘Civil Justice Reform.’’

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 605(b)) exempts an agency from the requirement to conduct a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements if the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entitiesinclude small businesses, small not-forprofit enterprises, and small governmental jurisdictions. The Attorney General has reviewed this proposed rule and, by approving it,
certifies that it will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule recodifies the ATF regulations governing the procedure and practice for disapproving applications, denying renewals, and revoking explosives licenses or permits under


### 60394 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

federal explosives law in a new part 771 under ATF’s regulatory authority.

Additionally, this proposed rule updates the regulations governing the denial, suspension, or revocation of a firearms license, and imposition of a
civil fine under federal firearms law to only reference regulations under ATF authority. This proposed rule also amends the regulations to require an applicant or licensee in a proceeding concerning the denial, suspension, or revocation of a firearms license, or the imposition of a civil fine under federal firearms law, to file a duly executed power of attorney designating his representative, and waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 ( See 5 U.S.C. 552(a)), and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and
disclosure of returns and return information). This is required in the current regulations by reference to 31 CFR Part 8 and 26 CFR 601.521 through 601.527. The changes proposed in this rule are purely administrative and do not add any new requirements that would have any impact on the economy.

E. Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996

This proposed rule is not a major rule as defined by section 251 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, 5 U.S.C. 804. This proposed rule will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more; a major increase in costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of United States-basedenterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and export markets.

F. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of

1995

This proposed rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more in any one year, and it will not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no actions were deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.

G. Paperwork Reduction Act

This proposed rule does not impose any new reporting or recordkeeping requirements under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.

Public Participation

A. Comments Sought

ATF is requesting comments on the proposed rule from all interested persons. ATF is also specifically requesting comments on the clarity of this proposed rule and how it may be
made easier to understand.

All comments must reference this document docket number (ATF 33P), be legible, and include the commenter’s name and mailing address. ATF will treat all comments as originals and will not acknowledge receipt of comments.

Comments received on or before the closing date will be carefully
considered. Comments received after that date will be given the same consideration if it is practical to do so,
but assurance of consideration cannot be given except as to comments received on or before the closing date.

B. Confidentiality

Comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing at ATF and on the Internet as part of the eRulemaking initiative. Comments are subject to the Freedom of Information
Act. Commenters who do not want their names or other personal identifying information posted on the Internet should submit their comments by mail or facsimile, along with a separate cover sheet containing their personal identifying information. Both the cover
sheet and comment must reference this
docket number. Information contained in the cover sheet will not be posted on the Internet. Any personal identifying information that appears within the comment will be posted on the Internet and will not be redacted by ATF.

Any material that a commenter considers to be inappropriate for disclosure to the public should not be included in the comment. Any person submitting a comment shall specifically designate that portion (if any) of the
comments that contains material that is confidential under law (e.g., trade secrets, processes, etc.). Any portion of
a comment that is confidential under law shall be set forth on pages separate
from the balance of the comment and shall be prominently marked ‘‘confidential’’ at the top of each page.
Confidential information will be included in the rulemaking record but will not be disclosed to the public. Any comments containing material that is not confidential under law may be disclosed to the public. In any event, the name of the person submitting a comment is not exempt from disclosure.

C. Submitting Comments

Comments may be submitted in any of three ways:

• Mail: Send written comments to the
address listed in the **ADDRESSES** section
of this document. Written comments may be of any length, must appear in minimum 12-point font size (.17 inches), and include the commenter’s mailing address and signature.

• Facsimile: You may submit comments by facsimile transmission to (202) 648–9741. Faxed comments must:

(1) Be legible and appear in minimum 12-point font size (.17 inches);

(2) Be on 8 1 ⁄ 2′′ x 11 ′′ paper; (3) Contain a legible, written signature; and

(4) Be no more than five pages long. ATF will not accept faxed comments that exceed five pages.

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: To
submit comments to ATF via the Federal eRulemaking portal, visit http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for submitting

comments.

D. Request for Hearing

Any interested person who desires an opportunity to comment orally at a public hearing should submit such request for a hearing, in writing, to the Director of ATF within the 90-day comment period. Address requests for public hearings to Denise Brown, Enforcement Programs and Services, Office of Regulatory Affairs, Mailstop 6N–602, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 99 New York Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226;

ATTN: ATF 33P. The Director, however, reserves the right to determine, in light of all circumstances, whether a public hearing is necessary.

Disclosure

Copies of this proposed rule and the
comments received will be available for public inspection by appointment during normal business hours at: ATF Reading Room, Room 1E–062, 99 New York Avenue NE., Washington, DC 20226; telephone: (202) 648–8740.

Drafting Information

The author of this document is Denise Brown; Enforcement Programs and Services; Office of Regulatory Affairs, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives.

List of Subjects

27 CFR Part 478

Administrative practice and procedure, Arms and munitions, Customs duties and inspection, Exports, Imports, Intergovernmental relations, Law enforcement officers, Military personnel, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Research, Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation.


### 60395 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

27 CFR Part 555

Administrative practice and procedure, Customs duties and inspection, Explosives, Hazardous substances, Imports, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Safety, Security measures, Seizures and forfeitures, Transportation,
Warehouses.

27 CFR Part 771

Administrative practice and procedure, Explosives.

Authority and Issuance

Accordingly, for the reasons discussed in the preamble, 27 CFR Parts 478 and 555 are proposed to be amended and Part 771 is proposed to be added to chapter II, title 27 as follows:

**PART 478—COMMERCE IN FIREARMS**
**AND AMMUNITION**

■ 1. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 478 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552(a); 18 U.S.C. 847, 921–931; 44 U.S.C. 3504(h).

■ 2. Section 478.76 is revised to read as
follows:

**§ 478.76 Representation at a hearing.**

Applicants or licensees may represent themselves or be represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person, specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney that shall be filed in the proceeding by the applicant or licensee. The applicant or licensee shall file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings under §§ 478.72 and 478.74 by an attorney in
the Office of Chief Counsel who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding, on behalf of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney’s own name as ‘‘Attorney for the

Government.’’

**PART 555—COMMERCE IN**
**EXPLOSIVES**

■ 3. The authority citation for 27 CFR part 555 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 18 U.S.C. 847.

■ 4. Amend § 555.73 by removing ‘‘part 71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.

■ 5. Amend § 555.75 by removing ‘‘part 71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.

■ 6. Revise 555.78 to read as follows: **§ 555.78 Representation at a hearing.** An applicant, licensee, or permittee may represent himself, or be represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person, specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney that shall be filed in the proceeding by the applicant, licensee, or permittee. The applicant, licensee, or permittee shall file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings under §§ 555.73 and 555.75 by an attorney in
the Office of Chief Counsel who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs and other papers in the proceeding, on behalf of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney’s own name as ‘‘Attorney for the

Government.’’

■ 7. Amend § 555.79 by removing ‘‘part 71’’ and adding in its place ‘‘part 771’’.

■ 8. Revise § 555.82 to read as follows:

**§ 555.82 Rules of practice in license and permit proceedings.** 

Regulations governing the procedure and practice for disapproval of applications for explosives licenses and permits and for the denial of renewal or revocation of such licenses and permits under the Act are contained in part 771 of this chapter.

■ 9. Add subchapter E (consisting of part 771) to 27 CFR chapter II to read
as follows:

**SUBCHAPTER E—EXPLOSIVE**
**LICENSE AND PERMIT PROCEEDINGS**

**PART 771—RULES OF PRACTICE IN**
**EXPLOSIVE LICENSE AND PERMIT**
**PROCEEDINGS**

**Subpart A—Scope and Construction of Regulations** 

Sec. 771.1 Scope of part.
771.2 Liberal construction. 771.3 Forms prescribed.

**Subpart B—Definitions**
771.5 Meaning of terms.

**Subpart C—General**
771.25 Communications and pleadings. 771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or permittee. 771.27 Service on the Director of Industry Operations or Director.

Time

771.28 Computation.
771.29 Continuances and extensions.

Representation at Hearings
771.30 Personal representation. 771.31 Attorneys and other representatives. **Subpart D—Compliance and Settlement**
771.35 Opportunity for compliance.
771.36 Settlement. 771.37 Notice of contemplated action. 771.38 Licensee’s or permittee’s failure to meet requirements within reasonable

time. 771.39 Authority of Director of Industry Operations to proceed with revocation or
denial action.

**Subpart E—Revocation or Denial**
771.40 Denial of initial application 771.41 Denial of renewal application or revocation of license or permit
771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses or permits. 771.43 Grounds for denial of applications for licenses or permits.

**Subpart F—Hearing Procedure**

Notices

771.55 Content.

771.56 Forms. 771.57 Execution and disposition. 771.58 Designated place of hearing.

Request for Hearing

771.59 Initial application proceedings.
771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings. 771.61 Notice of hearing.

Non-Request for Hearing

771.62 Initial application
771.63 Revocation or denial of renewal.

Responses to Notices

771.64 Answers. 771.65 Responses admitting facts.
771.66 Initial conferences.

Failure To Appear

771.67 Initial applications.
771.68 Revocation or denial of renewal.

Waiver of Hearing

771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing. 771.70 Adjudication based upon written
submissions.

Surrender of License or Permit

771.71 Before citation.
771.72 After citation.

Motions

771.73 General. 771.74 Prior to hearing. 771.75 At hearing.

Hearing

771.76 General. 771.77 Initial applications.
771.78 Revocation or denial of renewal.

Burden of Proof
771.79 Initial applications.
771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.

General
771.81 Stipulations at hearing.
771.82 Evidence. 771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments, briefs, and proposed findings. 771.84 Reopening of the hearing.


### 60396 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

Record of Testimony

771.85 Stenographic record. 771.86 Oath of reporter.

**Subpart G—Administrative Law Judges**

771.95 Responsibilities of administrative law judges. 771.96 Disqualification.

771.97 Powers. 771.98 Separation of functions. 771.99 Conduct of hearing. 771.100 Unavailability of administrative law judge.

**Subpart H—Decisions**

771.105 Administrative law judge’s findings and recommended decision.

771.106 Certification and transmittal of

record and decision.

Action by Director of Industry Operations

771.107 Initial application proceedings. 771.108 Director of Industry Operations’

decision.

771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.

771.110 Revocation or denial of renewal. 771.111 Proceedings involving violations

not within the division of issuance of license or permit.

**Subpart I—Review**

771.120 Appeal on petition to the Director. 771.121 Review by Director.

771.122 Denial of renewal or revocation.

771.123 Court review.

**Subpart J—Miscellaneous**

771.124 Depositions.
771.125 Witnesses and fees. 771.126 Discovery. 771.127 Privileges.

Record

771.135 What constitutes record. 771.136 Availability.

Authority: 18 U.S.C. 843, 847.

**Subpart A—Scope and Construction of Regulations** 

**§ 771.1 Scope of part.**

Regulations in this part govern procedures and practices for disapproving applications for licenses and permits and denying renewal of or revocation of such licenses or permits under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40.

**§ 771.2 Liberal construction.**

Regulations in this part shall be liberally construed to secure just, expeditious, and efficient determination of the issues presented. The Rules of
Civil Procedure for the U.S. District Courts (28 U.S.C. appendix) are not controlling, but may act as a guide in any situation not provided for or controlled by this part and shall be liberally construed or relaxed when

necessary. **§ 771.3 Forms prescribed.** (a) The Director is authorized to prescribe all forms required by this part.
All of the information called for in each form shall be furnished as indicated by the headings on the form and the instructions on or pertaining to the form. In addition, information called for
in each form shall be furnished as required by this part.

(b) Requests for forms should be made
to the ATF Distribution Center or through the ATF Web site at http:// www.atf.gov.

**Subpart B—Definitions**

**§ 771.5 Meaning of terms.**

When used in this part and in forms prescribed under this part, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof, terms shall have the meaning provided in this subpart. Words in the plural form shall include the singular,
and vice versa, and words importing the masculine gender shall include the
feminine.

Administrative law judge. The person appointed pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 3105, designated to preside over any administrative proceedings under this part.

Applicant. Any person who has filed an application for a license or permit under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40.

Application. Any application for a license or permit under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 for operations not covered by an existing license or permit.

ATF. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice.

Attorney for the Government. An attorney in the ATF Office of Chief Counsel authorized to represent the Director of Industry Operations in the proceeding.

CFR. The Code of Federal Regulations.

Contemplated notice. Includes any notice contemplating the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit.

Director. The Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, Department of Justice.

Director of Industry Operations. The principal ATF official in a Field Operations division responsible for administering regulations in this part.

Ex parte communication. An oral or
written communication not on the public record with respect to which reasonable prior notice to all parties is not given, but not including requests for status reports.

Initial decision. The decision of the Director of Industry Operations in a proceeding concerning the revocation of, denial of renewal of, or denial of application for a license or permit. This decision becomes the agency’s final decision in the absence of an appeal.

Final decision. The definitive decision of ATF, e.g., the agency’s decision in the absence of an appeal or the Director’s decision following an appeal to the Director.

License. Subject to applicable law, entitles the licensee to transport, ship, and receive explosive materials in interstate or foreign commerce, and to engage in the business specified by the license, at the location described on the
license.

Licensee. Any importer, manufacturer, or dealer licensed under the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40
and 27 CFR Part 555.

Limited permit. A permit issued to a person authorizing him to receive for his use explosive materials from a licensee or permittee in his State of
residence on no more than six occasions during the 12-month period in which the permit is valid. A limited permit does not authorize the receipt or transportation of explosive materials in interstate or foreign commerce.

Other term. Any other term defined in the Federal explosives laws (18 U.S.C. Chapter 40), the regulations promulgated thereunder (27 CFR Part 555), or the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.), where used in this part, shall have the meaning assigned to it therein.

Permittee. Any user of explosives for a lawful purpose who has obtained either a user permit or a limited permit under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 and 27 CFR

Part 555.

Person. Any individual, corporation, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company.

Recommended decision. The advisory decision of the administrative law judge in any proceeding regarding the revocation of, denial of renewal of, or denial of application for a license or permit. ATF must act on a
recommended decision with its own
initial or final decision.

User-limited permit. A user permit valid only for a single purchase transaction. Recipients of a user-limited permit must obtain a new permit for any subsequent purchase transaction.

User permit. A permit issued to a person authorizing him to—

(1) Acquire for his own use explosive
materials from a licensee in a State other
than the State in which he resides or from a foreign country, and;

(2) Transport explosive materials in interstate or foreign commerce.

Willfulness. The plain indifference to, or purposeful disregard of, a known


### 60397 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

legal duty. Willfulness may be demonstrated by, but does not require, repeat violations involving a known legal duty.

**Subpart C—General**

**§ 771.25 Communications and pleadings.**

(a) All communications to the Government regarding the procedures set forth in this part and all pleadings, such as answers, motions, requests, or other papers or documents required or permitted to be filed under this part, relating to a proceeding pending before an administrative law judge, shall be
addressed to the administrative law judge at his post of duty and the attorney for the Government. Communications concerning proceedings not pending before an administrative law judge should be addressed to the Director of Industry Operations or Director, as the case may
be.

(b) Except to the extent required for the disposition of ex parte matters as authorized by law, no ex parte
communications shall be made to or from the administrative law judge concerning the merits of the adjudication. If the administrative law judge receives or makes an ex parte communication not authorized by law, the administrative law judge shall place on the record of the proceeding:

(1) All such written communications; (2) Memoranda stating the substance of all such oral communications; and

(3) All written responses and memoranda stating the substance of all oral responses to paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.

**§ 771.26 Service on applicant, licensee, or permittee.** 

All orders, notices, motions, and other formal documents required to be served under the regulations in this part may be served by mailing a signed, original copy thereof to the designated representative of the applicant, licensee, or permittee by certified mail, with request for return receipt card, at the representative’s business address, by personal service, or as otherwise agreed to by the parties. If the applicant, licensee, or permittee has not yet designated a representative, all orders, notices, motions, and other formal documents required to be served under the regulations in this part may be served by mailing a signed, original copy thereof to the applicant, licensee, or permittee at the address stated on his application, license, or permit, or at his last known address, or by delivery of such original copy to the applicant, licensee, or permittee personally, or in the case of a corporation, partnership, or other unincorporated association, by delivering the same to an officer, or manager, or general agent thereof, or to its attorney of record. Such personal service may be made by any employee of the Department of Justice designated by the Attorney General or by any employee of ATF. A certificate of mailing and the return receipt card, or certificate of service signed by the person making such service, shall be filed as a part of the record.

**§ 771.27 Service on the Director of Industry Operations or Director.** 

Pleadings, motions, notices, and other formal documents may be served by certified mail, by personal service, or as otherwise agreed to by the parties on the Director of Industry Operations (or upon the attorney for the Government on behalf of the Director of Industry Operations), or on the Director, if the proceeding is before him for review on appeal.

Time

**§ 771.28 Computation.**

In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this part, the day of the act, event, or default after which the designated period of time is to run is not to be included. The last day of the period to be computed is to be included, unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday, in which event the period runs until the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday, or Federal holiday. Pleadings, requests, or other papers or documents required or permitted to be filed under this part must be received for filing at the appropriate office within the time limits, if any, for such filing.

**§ 771.29 Continuances and extensions.**

For good cause shown, the administrative law judge, Director, or Director of Industry Operations, as the case may be, may grant continuances and, as to all matters pending before him, extend any time limit prescribed by the regulations in this part (except where the time limit is statutory).

Representation at Hearings

**§ 771.30 Personal representation.**

Any individual or member of a partnership may appear for himself, or for such partnership, and a corporation or association may be represented by a bona fide officer of such corporation or association, upon showing of adequate
authorization. **§ 771.31 Attorneys and other representatives.** 

An applicant, licensee, or permittee may represent himself, or be represented by an attorney, a certified public accountant, or any other person, specifically designated in a duly executed power of attorney that shall be filed in the proceeding by the applicant, licensee, or permittee. The applicant, licensee, or permittee shall file waivers, if applicable, under the Privacy Act of 1974 and 26 U.S.C. 6103(c) (confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information). The Director of Industry Operations may be represented in proceedings by an attorney in the Office of Chief Counsel
who is authorized to execute and file motions, briefs, and other papers in the proceeding on behalf of the Director of Industry Operations, in the attorney’s own name as ‘‘Attorney for the

Government.’’

**Subpart D—Compliance and**
**Settlement**

**§ 771.35 Opportunity for compliance.**

No license or permit shall be revoked or denied renewal unless, prior to the institution of proceedings, facts or conduct warranting such action shall
have been called to the attention of the licensee or permittee by the Director of Industry Operations in writing in a contemplated notice, and the licensee or permittee shall have been accorded an opportunity to demonstrate or achieve compliance with all lawful requirements as set forth in section 9(b)
of the Administrative Procedure Act. In cases in which the Director of Industry Operations alleges in his contemplated notice, with supporting reasons, willful violations or that the public interest requires otherwise, this section does not apply and the issuance of a contemplated notice is unnecessary.

**§ 771.36 Settlement.**

Any proposals of settlement should be made to the Director of Industry Operations, but may be made through the attorney for the Government. Where necessary, the date of the hearing may be postponed pending consideration of such proposals when they are made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay. If proposals of settlement are submitted, and they are considered unsatisfactory, the Director of Industry Operations may reject the proposals and may, either directly or through the attorney for the Government, inform the licensee or permittee of any conditions on which the alleged violations may be settled. If the proposals of settlement are considered satisfactory to the Director of


### 60398 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

Industry Operations, the licensee or permittee shall be notified thereof and the proceeding shall be dismissed.

**§ 771.37 Notice of contemplated action.**

Where the Director of Industry Operations has not ascertained whether the licensee or permittee has willfully violated the federal explosives laws and
where he believes the matter has the potential to be settled informally, i.e.,
without formal administrative proceedings, he shall, in accordance with section 5(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, prior to the issuance of
a notice of revocation or denial of renewal, give the licensee or permittee a contemplated notice of such action and an opportunity to show why the license or permit should not be revoked
or denied renewal. The notice should inform the licensee or permittee of the charges on which the notice would be based, if issued, and afford him a period of 15 days from the date of the notice, or such longer period as the Director of Industry Operations deems necessary, in which to submit proposals of settlement to the Director of Industry Operations.
Where informal settlement is not reached promptly because of inaction by the applicant, licensee, or permittee or proposals are made for the purpose of delay, a notice shall be issued in accordance with §§ 771.42 or 771.43, as appropriate. The issuance of a notice of contemplated action does not entitle the recipient to a hearing before an administrative law judge.

**§ 771.38 Licensee’s or permittee’s failure to meet requirements within reasonable** 
**time.**

If the licensee or permittee fails to meet the requirements of applicable laws and regulations within such reasonable time as may be specified by the Director of Industry Operations, proceedings for revocation or denial of renewal of the license or permit shall be
initiated.

**§ 771.39 Authority of Director of Industry Operations to proceed with revocation or** 
**denial action.**

Where the evidence is conclusive and
the nature of the violation is such as to preclude any settlement, the violation is of a continuing character that necessitates immediate action to protect the public interest, or the Director of Industry Operations believes that any informal settlement of the alleged
violation will not ensure future compliance with applicable laws and regulations, or in any similar case where the circumstances are such as to clearly preclude informal settlement, and the Director of Industry Operations so finds
and states the reasons therefor in the notice, the Director of Industry Operations may proceed with the
revocation or denial of renewal.

**Subpart E—Revocation or Denial**

**§ 771.40 Denial of initial application.**

Whenever the Director of Industry Operations has reason to believe that an applicant for an original license or permit is not eligible to receive a license or permit under the provisions of § 555.49 of this chapter, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice of denial on ATF Form 5400.11 (Notice of Denial of Application for License or Permit) (F 5400.11). The notice will set
forth the matters of fact and law relied upon in determining that the application should be denied and will afford the applicant 15 days from the date of receipt of the notice in which to request a hearing to review the denial. If no request for a hearing is filed within that time, a copy of the application, marked ‘‘Disapproved,’’ will be returned to the applicant.

**§ 771.41 Denial of renewal application or revocation of license or permit.** 

If, following the opportunity for compliance under § 555.71 of this chapter, or without opportunity for compliance under § 555.71 of this chapter as circumstances warrant, the Director of Industry Operations finds that the licensee or permittee is not likely to comply with applicable laws or regulations or is otherwise not eligible to continue operations authorized under his license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a notice of denial of the renewal application or revocation of the license or permit, ATF F 5400.11 (Notice of Denial of Application for License or Permit) or ATF Form 5400.10 (Notice of Revocation of License or Permit) (F 5400.10), as appropriate. The notice will set forth the matters of fact constituting the violations specified, dates, places, and the sections of law and regulations
violated. In the case of the revocation of a license or permit, the notice will specify the date on which the action is effective, which date will be on or after
the date the notice is served on the licensee or permittee. The notice will also advise the licensee or permittee that he may, within 15 days after receipt of the notice, request a hearing and, if applicable, a stay of the effective date of the revocation of his license or permit.

**§ 771.42 Grounds for revocation of licenses or permits.** 

Whenever the Director of Industry Operations has reason to believe that any holder of a license or permit has willfully violated any provision of 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 or the regulations prescribed thereunder or has become ineligible to continue operations authorized under the license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall
issue a notice for the revocation of such license or permit, as the case may be.

**§ 771.43 Grounds for denial of applications for licenses or permits.** 

If, upon examination of any application (including a renewal application) for a license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations has reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to such license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall issue a denial of the application. An applicant is not eligible for a license or permit if he fails to meet the requirements of 18 U.S.C. 843(b) and § 555.49 of this chapter.

**Subpart F—Hearing Procedure**

Notices

**§ 771.55 Content.**

(a) Notices for the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit shall be promptly issued by the Director of Industry Operations and shall set forth:

(1) The sections of law and regulations relied upon for authority and jurisdiction;

(2) The specific grounds upon which the revocation or denial is based, i.e., the matters of fact constituting the violations specified, dates, places, and sections of law and regulations violated;

(3) In the case of a revocation, the date on which the action is effective; and

(4) That the licensee or permittee has 15 days from receipt of the notice within which to request a hearing before an administrative law judge.

(b) Notices for the denial of an initial application for a license or permit shall
set forth:

(1) The sections of law and regulations relied upon for authority and jurisdiction;

(2) The specific grounds upon which the denial is based, i.e., the matters of fact and law relied upon for the disapproval of the application; and

(3) That the application will be disapproved unless a hearing is requested within 15 days from receipt of
the Notice.

**§ 771.56 Forms.**

Notices shall be issued on the following forms:

(a) ATF Form 5400.9, ‘‘Order After Denial or Revocation Hearing,’’ for all
revocations or denials of renewal of licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40 after a hearing has
been held and a Recommended Decision


### 60399 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

has been issued by the administrative law judge;

(b) Form 5400.10, ‘‘Notice of Revocation for License or Permit,’’ for all revocations of licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40, except as provided for in paragraph (a) of this section;

(c) Form 5400.11, ‘‘Notice of Denial of Application for License or Permit,’’ for the denial of renewal or original applications for licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter 40, except as provided for in paragraph (a) of this section;

(d) Form 5400.12, ‘‘Notice of Contemplated Denial or Revocation of License or Permit,’’ for the contemplated revocation or denial of renewal application of licenses or permits pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Chapter

40; or

(e) Such other forms as the Director may prescribe.

**§ 771.57 Execution and disposition.**

A signed original of the applicable
form shall be served on the licensee or permittee. If a hearing is requested, a copy shall be sent to the administrative law judge designated to conduct the hearing. Any remaining copies shall be
retained for the office of the Director of Industry Operations.

**§ 771.58 Designated place of hearing.**

The designated place of hearing shall be determined by the administrative law judge, taking into consideration the convenience and necessity of the parties and their representatives.

Request for Hearing

**§ 771.59 Initial application proceedings.**

(a) If the applicant for an initial license or permit desires a hearing, he shall file a request in writing with the Director of Industry Operations within 15 days after receipt of notice of the disapproval, in whole or in part, of the application. The request should include a statement of the reasons for a hearing.

(b) On receipt of the request, the Director of Industry Operations shall forward a copy of the request, together with a copy of the notice, to the Office of Chief Counsel for the assignment of an administrative law judge.

(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel notifies the Director of Industry Operations or the attorney for the Government of the assignment of an administrative law judge, the Director of Industry Operations shall notify the licensee or permittee of the assignment.

**§ 771.60 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.** 

(a) If the licensee or permittee desires a hearing, he shall file a request, in writing, with the Director of Industry Operations within 15 days after receipt
of the notice or within such time as the Director of Industry Operations may
allow.

(b) Where a licensee or permittee requests a hearing, the Director of Industry Operations shall forward a copy of the request, together with a copy of the notice, to the Office of Chief Counsel for the assignment of an administrative law judge.

(c) After the Office of Chief Counsel notifies the Director of Industry Operations or the attorney for the Government of the assignment of an administrative law judge, the Director of Industry Operations shall notify the licensee or permittee of the assignment.

(d) In the case of a revocation, a licensee or permittee may include a request for a stay of the effective date of revocation with the request for a hearing.

(e) On receipt of a request for a stay of the effective date of a revocation, the Director of Industry Operations shall timely advise the licensee or permittee whether the stay is granted.

(1) If the stay is granted, the matter
shall be referred to an administrative law judge pursuant to paragraph (b) of
this section.

(2) If the stay is denied, the licensee or permittee may request an immediate hearing. In this event, the Director of Industry Operations shall immediately
refer the matter to the Office of Chief Counsel for the assignment of an administrative law judge, who shall set a date and place for hearing, which date shall be no later than 10 days from the date the licensee or permittee requested the immediate hearing.

**§ 771.61 Notice of hearing.**

Once a request for a hearing has been referred to the administrative law judge, the administrative law judge shall set a time and place for a hearing and shall serve notice thereof upon the parties at least 10 days in advance of the hearing
date.

Non-Request for Hearing

**§ 771.62 Initial application.**

In the case of an initial application, if the applicant does not request a hearing within 15 days, or within such
additional time as the Director of Industry Operations may in his discretion allow, the Director of Industry Operations will return a copy of the application, marked ‘‘Disapproved,’’ to the applicant, accompanied by a brief statement including the findings upon which the
denial is based. **§ 771.63 Revocation or denial of renewal.**

In the case of a revocation or denial of renewal of an application, if the licensee or permittee does not request a hearing within 15 days, or within such
additional time as the Director of Industry Operations may in his discretion allow, the Director of Industry Operations shall make the initial decision in the case pursuant to § 771.78(b).

Responses to Notices

**§ 771.64 Answers.**

(a) Where the licensee or permittee requests a hearing in accordance with § 771.60 of this chapter, a written response to the relevant notice may be filed with the administrative law judge and served on the Director of Industry Operations within 15 days after the licensee or permittee receives service of the designation of the administrative law judge.

(b) Where no hearing is requested, the licensee or permittee may file a written
answer to the relevant notice with the Director of Industry Operations within 15 days after service of the notice.

(c) An answer shall contain a concise
statement of the facts that constitute the grounds for defense. A hearing, if requested, may be limited to the issues
contained in the notice and the answer. The administrative law judge or Director of Industry Operations, as the case may be, may, as a matter of discretion, waive any requirement of this section.

(d) Answers need not be filed in initial application proceedings.

**§ 771.65 Responses admitting facts.**

If the licensee or permittee desires to waive the hearing on the allegations of
fact set forth in the notice and does not contest the facts, the answer may consist
of a statement that the licensee or permittee admits all material allegations of fact charged in the notice to be true. The Director of Industry Operations
shall base the decision on the notice and such answer, although such an answer
shall not affect the licensee’s or permittee’s right to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law or right to appeal.

**§ 771.66 Initial conferences.**

(a) In any proceeding, the administrative law judge, upon his own motion or upon the motion of one of the parties or their qualified representatives, may in the administrative law judge’s discretion direct the parties or their qualified representatives to appear at a specified time and place for a
conference to consider:

(1) Simplification of the issues;


### 60400 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

(2) The necessity of amendments to the pleadings;

(3) The possibility of obtaining stipulations, admissions of facts, and documents;

(4) The possibility of both parties exchanging information or scheduling discovery;

(5) A date on which both parties will simultaneously submit lists of proposed hearing exhibits;

(6) Limiting the number of expert witnesses;

(7) Identifying and, if practicable, scheduling all witnesses to be called; however, there is no requirement in these proceedings for the parties to submit pre-hearing statements or statements of proposed testimony by witnesses; and

(8) Such other matters as may aid in the disposition of the proceeding.

(b) As soon as practicable after such conference, the administrative law judge
shall issue an order that recites the action taken, the amendments allowed to the pleadings, and the agreements made by the parties or their qualified representatives as to any of the matters
considered. The order shall also limit the issues for hearing to those not disposed of by admission or agreement. Such order shall control the subsequent course of the proceedings, unless modified for good cause by a subsequent order. After discovery is complete, the order may be amended or supplemented if necessary.

Failure to Appear

**§ 771.67 Initial applications.**

Where the applicant on an initial application for a license or permit has requested a hearing and does not appear at the appointed time and place,
evidence has not been offered to refute or explain the grounds upon which disapproval of the application is contemplated, and no good cause has been shown for the failure to appear, the applicant shall be considered to have waived the hearing. When such waiver occurs, a default judgment against the applicant will be entered and the administrative law judge shall recommend disapproval of said application.

**§ 771.68 Revocation or denial of renewal.**

If, on the date set for a hearing concerning the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit, the licensee or permittee does not appear, no evidence has been offered, and no good cause has been shown for the failure to appear, the attorney for the Government will proceed ex parte and
offer for the record sufficient evidence
to make a prima facie case. At such hearing, documents, statements, and affidavits may be submitted in lieu of testimony of witnesses.

Waiver of Hearing

**§ 771.69 Withdrawal of request for hearing.**

At any time prior to the assignment of an administrative law judge, the licensee or permittee may, by filing
written notice with the Director of Industry Operations, withdraw his request for a hearing. If such a notice is filed after assignment to the administrative law judge and prior to
issuance of his recommended decision the Director of Industry Operations shall move the administrative law judge to dismiss the proceedings as moot. If such
a notice is filed either after issuance of
a notice of denial or notice of revocation and before assignment of the administrative law judge, or after issuance by the administrative law judge of his recommended decision and prior to the Director of Industry Operations’ order disapproving the application or denying the renewal of or revoking the license or permit, the Director of Industry Operations shall, by order, dismiss the proceeding.

**§ 771.70 Adjudication based upon written**
**submissions.**

The licensee or permittee may waive the hearing before the administrative law judge and stipulate that the matter will be adjudicated by the Director of Industry Operations based upon written submissions. Written submissions may include stipulations of law or facts, proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, briefs, or any other documentary material. The pleadings, together with the written submissions of both the licensee or permittee and the attorney for the Government, shall
constitute the record on which the
initial decision shall be based. The
election to contest the denial or revocation without a hearing under this
section does not affect the licensee’s or permittee’s right to appeal to the Director pursuant to § 555.79 of this chapter or to the United States Court of Appeals for the district in which the licensee or permittee resides or has his principle place of business pursuant to § 555.80 of this chapter.

Surrender of License or Permit

**§ 771.71 Before citation.**

If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license or permit before the notice of revocation or denial of renewal, the Director of Industry Operations may accept the surrender. But if the evidence, in the opinion of the Director of Industry Operations, warrants issuance of a notice for revocation or denial of renewal, the surrender shall be refused and the Director of Industry Operations shall issue the notice.

**§ 771.72 After citation.**

If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license or permit after notice, but prior to the referral to an administrative law judge and prior to an initial decision, the Director of Industry Operations may accept the surrender of the license or permit and dismiss the proceeding as moot. If a licensee or permittee surrenders the license or permit after notice and after the referral to the administrative law judge, but prior to the issuance of a recommended decision, the Director of Industry Operations may accept the surrender of the license or permit and shall move the administrative law judge to dismiss the proceedings as moot. In either case, if, in the opinion of the Director of Industry Operations, the evidence is
such as to warrant revocation or denial of renewal, as the case may be, the surrender of the license or permit shall be refused, and the proceeding shall

continue.

Motions

**§ 771.73 General.**

All motions shall be made and
addressed to the administrative law judge before whom the proceeding is pending, and copies of all motion papers shall be served upon the other party or parties. The administrative law judge may dispose of any motion without oral argument, but he may, if he so desires, set it down for hearing and request argument. The administrative law judge may dispose of such motion prior to the hearing on the merits or he may postpone the disposition until the hearing on the merits. No appeal may be taken from any ruling on a motion until
the whole record is certified for review. Examples of typical motions may be
found in the Rules of Civil Procedure referred to in § 771.2.

**§ 771.74 Prior to hearing.**

All motions that should be made prior to the hearing, such as a motion directed to the sufficiency of the pleadings or of preliminary orders, shall be filed in writing with the Director of Industry Operations or the administrative law judge if the matter has been referred to him, and shall briefly state the order or relief applied for and the grounds for
such motion.

**§ 771.75 At hearing.**

Motions at the hearing may be made in writing to the administrative law judge or stated orally on the record.


### 60401 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

Hearing

**§ 771.76 General.**

If a hearing is requested, it shall be held at the time and place stated in the notice of hearing unless otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge.

**§ 771.77 Initial applications.**

(a) The administrative law judge who presides at the hearing on initial applications shall recommend a decision to the Director of Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall certify the complete record of the proceedings before him and shall immediately forward the complete
certified record to the Director of Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall also send one copy of
his recommended decision to the applicant or the applicant’s representative, one copy to the attorney for the Government, and one copy to the Director of Industry Operations, who
shall make the initial decision as provided in § 771.107. The applicant may be directed by the Director of Industry Operations to produce such records as may be deemed necessary for examination. All hearings on applications shall be open to the public subject to such restrictions and limitations as may be consistent with orderly procedure.

(b) If no hearing is requested, the return of the application marked ‘‘Disapproved’’ is the Director of Industry Operations’ initial decision.

**§ 771.78 Revocation or denial of renewal.**

(a) The administrative law judge who presides at the hearing in proceedings
for the revocation or denial of renewal of licenses or permits shall make a
recommended decision to the Director of Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall certify the complete record of the proceedings before him and shall immediately forward the complete certified record to the Director of Industry Operations. The administrative law judge shall also send one copy of his recommended decision to the licensee or permittee or the licensee’s or permittee’s representative, one copy to the attorney for the Government, and one copy to the Director of Industry Operations, who
shall make the initial decision as provided in § 771.109.

(b) If no hearing is requested, the Director of Industry Operations shall
make the initial decision.

Burden of Proof

**§ 771.79 Initial applications.**

In hearings on the initial denial of applications, the burden of proof is on the Government to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the applicant is not entitled to a permit or license.

**§ 771.80 Revocation or denial of renewal.**

In hearings on the revocation or denial of renewal of a license or permit, the burden of proof is on the
Government to show that the Director of Industry Operations had reason to believe that the licensee or permittee is not entitled to a permit or license, as may be the case. The Government must meet this proof by a preponderance of
the evidence.

General

**§ 771.81 Stipulations at hearing.**

If there has been no initial conference under § 771.66, the administrative law judge may at the beginning of the hearing require that the parties attempt to arrive at such stipulations as will eliminate the necessity of taking evidence with respect to allegations of
fact about which there is no substantial dispute. The administrative law judge should take similar action, where appropriate, throughout the hearing and should call and conduct any
conferences that he deems advisable with a view to the simplification, clarification, and disposition of any of the issues involved in the hearing.

**§ 771.82 Evidence.**

Any relevant evidence that would be
admissible under the rules of evidence governing civil proceedings in matters not involving trial by jury in the Courts
of the United States shall be admissible. The administrative law judge may relax such rules in any hearing when in his judgment such relaxation would not impair the rights of either party and would more speedily conclude the hearing or would better serve the ends of justice. However, the administrative law judge shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. Every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, depositions, or duly authenticated copies of records and documents; to submit rebuttal evidence;
and to conduct such reasonable crossexamination as may be required for a
full and true disclosure of the facts.

(a) Witnesses. The administrative law judge shall have the right in his
discretion to limit the number of witnesses whose testimony may be merely cumulative and shall, as a matter of policy, not only exclude irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious
evidence but shall also limit the crossexamination of witnesses to that required for a full and true disclosure of the facts so as not to unnecessarily prolong the hearing and unduly burden the record. Opinion testimony shall be
admitted when the administrative law judge is satisfied that the witness is properly qualified as defined by Federal
Rule of Evidence 701.

(b) Documentary Evidence. Material
and relevant evidence shall not be
excluded because it is not the best evidence unless its authenticity is challenged, in which case reasonable time shall be given to establish its authenticity. When only portions of a document are to be relied upon, the offering party shall prepare the pertinent excerpts, adequately identified, and shall supply copies of such excerpts, together with a statement indicating the purpose for which such materials will be offered, to the administrative law judge and to the other parties. Only the excerpts, so prepared and submitted, shall be received in the record. However, the whole of the original document should
be made available for examination and for use by opposing counsel for purposes of cross-examination. Compilations, charts, summaries of data, and photostatic copies of documents may be admitted in evidence if the proceedings will thereby be expedited, and if the material upon which they are based is available for examination by the parties. Objections to the evidence shall be in short form, stating the grounds relied upon. The transcript shall not include argument or debate on objections, except as ordered by the administrative law judge, but shall include the rulings thereon. Where
official notice is taken of a material fact not appearing in the evidence in the record, any party shall, on timely request, be afforded an opportunity to
controvert such fact.

(c) Hearsay. Probative, material, and reliable hearsay evidence is admissible in proceedings under this subpart.

**§ 771.83 Closing of hearings; arguments, briefs, and proposed findings.** 

Before closing a hearing, the administrative law judge shall inquire of each party whether the party has any further evidence to offer, which inquiry and the response thereto shall be shown
in the record. The administrative law judge may hear arguments of counsel and the administrative law judge may limit the time of such arguments at his discretion. The administrative law judge may, in his discretion, allow briefs to be filed on behalf of either party but shall closely limit the time within which the briefs for both parties shall be filed, so


### 60402 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

as to avoid unreasonable delay. The administrative law judge shall also ascertain whether the parties desire to submit proposed findings and conclusions, together with supporting reasons, and, if so, a period of not more than 15 days (unless extended by the administrative law judge)—after the close of the hearing or receipt of a copy of the record, if one is requested—will be allowed for such purpose.

**§ 771.84 Reopening of the hearing.**

The Director, the Director of Industry Operations, or the administrative law judge, as the case may be, may, as to all matters pending before him, in his discretion reopen a hearing—

(a) In case of default under §§ 771.67 or 771.68 where the applicant, licensee, or permittee failed to request a hearing or to appear after one was set, upon petition setting forth reasonable grounds for such failure, and

(b) Where any party desires leave to adduce additional evidence upon petition summarizing such evidence, establishing its materiality, and stating reasonable grounds why such party with due diligence was unable to produce such evidence at the hearing.

Record of Testimony

**§ 771.85 Stenographic record.**

A stenographic record shall be made of the testimony and proceedings, including stipulations, admissions of fact, and arguments of counsel in all proceedings. A transcript of the evidence and proceedings at the hearing
shall be made in all cases.

**§ 771.86 Oath of reporter.**

The reporter making the stenographic
record shall subscribe an oath before the administrative law judge, to be filed in the record of the case, that he will truly and correctly report the oral testimony and proceedings at such hearing and accurately transcribe the same to the best of his ability.

**Subpart G—Administrative Law Judges** 

**§ 771.95 Responsibilities of administrative law judges.** 

Administrative law judges shall be
under the administrative control of the Director. In hearings under this subpart, administrative law judges must apply all governing agency rulings and governing agency precedent. They shall be responsible for the conduct of hearings and shall render their decisions as soon as is reasonably possible after the hearing is closed. Administrative law judges shall also be responsible for the preparation, certification, and forwarding of the complete record of proceedings and the administrative work relating thereto and, by arrangement with Directors of Industry Operations and representatives
of the Office of Chief Counsel shall have access to facilities and temporary use of personnel at such times and places as are needed in the prompt dispatch of
official business.

**§ 771.96 Disqualification.**

An administrative law judge shall, at any time, withdraw from any proceeding if he deems himself disqualified. Upon the filing in good faith by the applicant, licensee, permittee, or attorney for the Government of a timely and sufficient affidavit of facts showing personal bias or otherwise warranting the disqualification of any administrative law judge, if the administrative law judge fails to disqualify himself, the Director shall upon appeal, as provided in § 771.120, determine the matter as a part of the record and decision in the proceeding. If the Director decides the administrative law judge should have deemed himself disqualified, the
Director will remand the record for hearing de novo before another administrative law judge. If the Director should decide against the disqualification of the administrative law judge, the proceeding will be reviewed on its merits by the original administrative law judge. The burden is upon the party seeking disqualification
to set forth evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of the administrative law judge’s honesty and integrity.

**§ 771.97 Powers.**

Administrative law judges shall have authority to:

(a) Administer oaths and affirmations; (b) Issue subpoenas as authorized by law;

(c) Rule upon offers of proof and receive relevant evidence;

(d) Take or cause depositions to be taken whenever the ends of justice would be served thereby;

(e) Regulate the course of the hearing; (f) Hold conferences for the settlement or simplification of the issues by consent of the parties;

(g) Require the attendance at such
conferences of at least one representative of each party who has the authority to negotiate concerning resolution of issues in controversy;

(h) Dispose of procedural requests or similar matters;

(i) Render recommended decisions in proceedings on applications for licenses and permits and on revocation or denial of renewal of licenses or permits; (j) Call, examine, and cross-examine witnesses, including hostile or adverse witnesses, when the administrative law judge deems such action to be necessary to a just disposition of the case, and introduce into the record documentary or other evidence; and

(k) Take any other action authorized by rule of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives
consistent with the Administrative
Procedure Act.

**§ 771.98 Separation of functions.**

Administrative law judges shall perform no functions inconsistent with their duties and responsibilities. The Director may assign administrative law judges duties not inconsistent with the performance of their functions as administrative law judges. Except to the extent required for the disposition of ex parte matters as required by law, no administrative law judge shall consult any person or party as to any fact in
issue unless there has been notice and opportunity for all parties to participate.
The functions of the administrative law judge shall be entirely separated from the general investigative functions of the agency. No officer, employee, or agent engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in any proceeding shall, in that proceeding or a factually related proceeding, participate or advise in the administrative law judge’s or Director’s decision, or in the agency review on appeal, except as a witness or counsel in the proceedings. The administrative law judge may not informally obtain advice or opinions from the parties or their counsel, or from any officer or employee of the ATF, as to the facts or the weight or interpretation to be given
to the evidence. The administrative law judge may, however, informally obtain advice on matters of law or procedure in a proceeding from officers or employees who were not engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions in that proceeding or a factually related proceeding. The administrative law judge may, at any time, consult with and obtain
instructions from the Director on questions of law and policy. Furthermore, it is not a violation of the separation of functions for the administrative law judge to participate in the questioning of witnesses, where the questioning is for clarification or to move the proceedings along, and where the questioning is not so extensive as to place the administrative law judge in the position of a prosecuting officer.


### 60403 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

**§ 771.99 Conduct of hearing.**

The administrative law judge is charged with the duty of conducting a fair and impartial hearing and of maintaining order in form and manner consistent with the dignity of a court proceeding. In the event that counsel or any person or witness in any proceeding shall refuse to obey the orders of the administrative law judge, or be guilty of disorderly or contemptuous language or conduct in connection with any hearing, the administrative law judge may, for good cause stated in the record, suspend the hearing, and, in the case of disorderly or contemptuous language or conduct by an attorney, recommend that the Director report the matter to the Chief Counsel regarding the attorney for the Government or the applicable state bar association regarding the attorney for a licensee or permittee for disciplinary action. The refusal of a witness to answer any question that has been ruled to be proper shall be considered by the administrative law judge in determining the weight to be given all the testimony of that witness.

**§ 771.100 Unavailability of administrative law judge.** 

In the event that the administrative law judge designated to conduct a hearing becomes unavailable before the filing of his findings and recommended decision, the Director may assign the case to another administrative law judge for the continuance of the proceeding, in accordance with the regulations in this part in the same manner as if he had been designated administrative law judge at the commencement of the proceeding.

**Subpart H—Decisions**

**§ 771.105 Administrative law judge’s findings and recommended decision.** 

Within a reasonable time after the conclusion of the hearing, and as expeditiously as possible, the administrative law judge shall render
his recommended decision. All decisions shall become a part of the record and, if proposed findings and conclusions have been filed, shall show the administrative law judge’s ruling upon each of such proposed findings
and conclusions. Decisions shall consist
of:

(a) A brief statement of the issues of fact involved in the proceeding;

(b) The administrative law judge’s findings and conclusions, as well as the
reasons or basis therefor with record references, upon all the material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record (including, when appropriate, comment as to the credibility and demeanor of the witnesses); and

(c) The administrative law judge’s
recommended determination as to the
revocation or denial at issue.

**§ 771.106 Certification and transmittal of**
**record and decision.**

After reaching his decision, the administrative law judge shall certify the complete record of the proceeding before him and shall immediately forward the complete certified record together with one copy of the administrative law judge’s
recommended decision to the Director of Industry Operations for initial decision, one copy of the recommended decision to the applicant or the applicant’s representative, and one copy
of the recommended decision to the attorney for the Government.

Action by Director of Industry Operations

**§ 771.107 Initial application proceedings.**

(a) Accepting the recommended
decision. If the Director of Industry Operations, after consideration of the record of the hearing and of any proposed findings, conclusions, or exceptions filed with him by the applicant, accepts the recommended
decision of the administrative law judge, the Director of Industry Operations shall by order approve or disapprove of the application in
accordance with the recommended decision. If the Director of Industry Operations approves the application, he shall briefly state for the record his reasons therefor. However, if the Director of Industry Operations disapproves of the applications, he shall serve a copy of the administrative law judge’s recommended decision on the applicant, informing the applicant of the Director of Industry Operations’ contemplated action and affording the applicant not more than 10 days in which to submit proposed findings and conclusions or exceptions to the
recommended decision with reasons in support thereof.

(b) Rejecting the recommended
decision. If, after such consideration referenced in paragraph (a) of this section, the Director of Industry Operations rejects the recommended
decision of the administrative law judge, in whole or in part, the Director of Industry Operations shall by order make such findings and conclusions as in his opinion are warranted by the law and facts in the record. Any decision of the Director of Industry Operations ordering the disapproval of an application for a permit shall state the findings and conclusions upon which it is based, including his ruling upon each proposed finding, conclusion, and exception to the administrative law judge’s recommended decision, together
with a statement of the administrative law judge’s findings, conclusions, and reasons or basis therefor, upon all material issues of fact, law, or discretion presented on the record. A signed original of the decision of the Director of Industry Operations shall be served upon the applicant and the original copy containing a certificate of service shall be placed in the official record of the proceeding.

**§ 771.108 Director of Industry Operations’**

**decision.**

When the Director of Industry Operations issues an initial decision in accordance with §§ 771.77 or 771.107 the decision shall become a part of the
record. The decision shall consist of:

(a) A brief statement of the issues involved in the proceedings;

(b) The Director of Industry Operations’ findings and conclusions, as well as the reasons therefor; and

(c) The Director of Industry Operations’ determination on the
record.

**§ 771.109 Revocation or denial of renewal proceedings.** 

(a) Accepting the recommended
decision. After consideration of the complete certified record of the hearing, if the Director of Industry Operations agrees with the recommended decision of the administrative law judge, the Director of Industry Operations shall enter an order revoking or denying the renewal of the license or permit or dismissing the proceedings in
accordance with the administrative law judge’s recommended decision.

(b) Rejecting the recommended
decision. After consideration of the complete certified record of the hearing, if the Director of Industry Operations disagrees with the recommended
decision of the administrative law judge, he may file a petition with the
Director for review of the recommended decision, as provided in § 771.120. If the Director of Industry Operations files such a petition, he shall withhold issuance of the order pending the decision of the Director, upon receipt of
which he shall issue the order in
accordance with the Director’s decision. A signed original of the order of the Director of Industry Operations shall be served upon the licensee or permittee or his representative and the original copy containing a certificate of service shall be placed in the official record of the proceeding.


### 60404 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

(c) In a case where the initial decision is made by the Director of Industry Operations in accordance with § 771.78(b), the Director of Industry Operations shall also issue an order revoking or denying the renewal of the license or permit, or dismissing the proceedings in accordance with his initial decision. A signed original of the
decision and order of the Director of Industry Operations shall be served upon the licensee or permittee or his representative and the original copy placed in the official record of the proceeding.

**§ 771.110 Revocation or denial of renewal.**

Pursuant to § 771.109(a), when the Director of Industry Operations issues an order revoking or denying the renewal of a license or permit, he shall furnish a copy of the order and of the
recommended decision on which it is
based to the Director. Should such order be subsequently set aside on review by the courts, the Director of Industry Operations will so advise the Director.

**§ 771.111 Proceedings involving violations**
**not within the division of issuance of license or permit.** 

In the event violations occurred at a place not within the field division where the licensee or permittee is located, the Director of Industry Operations of the field division where the licensee or permittee is located will take jurisdiction over any proceeding and will take appropriate action in accordance with this subpart, including issuing the relevant notice.

**Subpart I—Review**

**§ 771.120 Appeal on petition to the**
**Director.**

(a) An appeal to the Director may be made by the applicant, licensee, or permittee, or by the Director of Industry Operations. For the applicant, licensee, or permittee, such appeal shall be made by filing a petition for review on appeal with the Director within 15 days of the service of the adverse initial decision by the Director of Industry Operations. For the Director of Industry Operations, such appeal shall be taken by filing a petition for review on appeal with the Director within 15 days of the issuance of the administrative law judge’s decision recommending against
revocation or denial of renewal. The petitioning applicant, licensee, or permittee must submit arguments showing that the Director of Industry Operations’ initial decision, and if applicable the underlying administrative law judge’s recommended decision, was without reasonable warrant in fact or contrary to law and regulations. The petitioning DIO must submit arguments showing the administrative law judge’s
recommended decision was without reasonable warrant in fact or contrary to law and regulations. Nothing in these regulations shall limit the authority of
the Director to review the administrative law judge’s decision exercising all the powers that he would have in making
the recommended decision.

(b) A copy of the petition shall be filed with the Director of Industry Operations or served on the applicant, licensee, or permittee, as the case may be. In the event of an appeal, the Director of Industry Operations shall immediately certify and forward the complete original record, by certified mail, to the Director, for his
consideration and review.

**§ 771.121 Review by Director.**

(a) Modification or reversal. On appeal, the Director shall afford a reasonable opportunity for the submission of proposed findings, conclusions, or exceptions with reasons in support thereof and an opportunity for oral argument. The Director may alter or modify any finding of the administrative law judge (or of the Director of Industry Operations as the case may be) and may affirm, reverse, or modify the recommended decision of the administrative law judge, or the
initial decision of the Director of Industry Operations, or may remand the case for further hearing, but shall not consider evidence that is not a part of
the record.

(b) Affirmance. Except in the case of a remand, when, on appeal, the Director
affirms the initial decision of the Director of Industry Operations or the
recommended decision of the administrative law judge, as the case may be, such decision shall be the agency’s final decision.

(c) Recusal. Appeals and petitions for review shall not be decided by the Director in any proceeding in which the Director has engaged in an investigation or prosecution and in such event the
Director shall so state his disqualification in writing and refer the record to the Deputy Director for appropriate action. The Deputy Director may designate an Assistant Director or one of the Deputy Director’s principal aides to consider any proceeding instead of the Director. The original copy of the decision on review shall be placed in the official record of the proceeding, a signed duplicate original shall be served upon the applicant, licensee, or permittee, and a copy shall
be transmitted to the Director of Industry Operations. **§ 771.122 Denial of renewal or revocation.**

If the Director orders the denial of an application, a copy of the application marked ‘‘Disapproved’’ will be returned to the applicant by the Director of Industry Operations. If the Director
orders a revocation of a license of permit, any stay of revocation will be
withdrawn and the revocation will become effective upon the order of the Director of Industry Operations. After
the issuance of a denial of a renewal application or a revocation, and pending the final determination of a timely appeal, the licensee or permittee may continue operations, if at all, pursuant to § 555.83 of this chapter.

**§ 771.123 Court review.**

(a) If an applicant, licensee, or permittee files an appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the district in which he resides or has his principle place of business, within 60 days after the receipt of the Director’s decision, the Director, upon notification that an appeal has been taken, shall prepare the
record for submission to the court in accordance with applicable court rules.

(b) If an applicant, licensee, or permittee does not seek review with the Director, but instead seeks review within 60 days after the receipt of the
initial decision of the Director of Industry Operations pursuant to § 771.109, the Director of Industry Operations, upon notification that an appeal has been taken, shall prepare the
record for submission to the court in accordance with applicable court rules. The Director of Industry Operations shall notify the Director if such an appeal is taken.

(c) The Director, or the Director of Industry Operations, as the case may be, shall certify the correctness of the transcript of the record, forward one copy to the attorney for the Government in the review of the case, and file the original record of the proceedings with the original certificate in the appropriate United States Court of Appeals.

**Subpart J—Miscellaneous**

**§ 771.124 Depositions.**

The administrative law judge may take or order the taking of depositions by either party to the proceeding at such time and place as the administrative law judge may designate before a person having the power to administer oaths, upon application therefor and notice to the parties to the action. The testimony shall be reduced to writing by the person taking the deposition, or a person under his direction, and the deposition shall be subscribed by the


### 60405 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 7, 2014 / Proposed Rules

deponent unless subscribing thereof is waived in writing by the parties.

**§ 771.125 Witnesses and fees.**

Witnesses summoned before the administrative law judge may be paid the same fees and mileage that are paid
witnesses in the courts of the United States, and witnesses whose depositions are taken and the persons taking the same shall severally be entitled to the same fees as are paid for like services in
the courts of the United States. Witness fees and mileage shall be paid by the party at whose instance the witnesses appear and the person taking the deposition shall be paid by the party at whose instance the deposition is taken.

**§ 771.126 Discovery.**

The discovery provisions of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the
Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure are not controlling with respect to agency proceedings under this part. However, fundamental fairness requires a party be given the opportunity to know what
evidence is offered and a chance to rebut such evidence. Either party may petition the administrative law judge for non-burdensome discovery if the party
can demonstrate that the interests of justice require disclosure of these
materials.

**§ 771.127 Privileges.**

The Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 559, provides that, except as otherwise required by law, privileges relating to procedure or evidence apply equally to agencies and persons. Therefore, an agency may rely on judicially-approved privileges to resist production of its files where appropriate.

Record

**§ 771.135 What constitutes record.**

The transcript of testimony, pleadings, exhibits, all papers and requests filed in the proceeding, and all findings, decisions, and orders, shall
constitute the exclusive record. Where
the decision rests on official notice of material fact not appearing in the record, the administrative law judge shall so state in his findings and any party shall, on timely request, be afforded an opportunity to show facts to the contrary.

**§ 771.136 Availability.**

A copy of the record shall be available for inspection or copying by the parties to the proceedings during business
hours at the office of the administrative law judge or the Director of Industry Operations or, pending administrative review, at the Office of the Director. Dated: October 1, 2014.
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General.

[FR Doc. 2014–23932 Filed 10–6–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 4410–FY–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**
**AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R09–OAR–2014–0615; FRL–9916–94– Region 9]** 

**Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Placer County** 
**Air Pollution Control District**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Proposed rule.

**SUMMARY :**  The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a revision to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns oxides of nitrogen (NOx) emissions from natural gas-fired water heaters, small boilers, and process heaters. We are proposing to approve a local rule to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

**DATES :**  Any comments on this proposal must arrive by November 6, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA–R09– OAR–2014–0615, by one of the following methods:

1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line

instructions.

2. Email: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.

3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.

Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email. www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email address will be automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to

technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.

Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or

viruses.

Docket: Generally, documents in the

docket for this action are available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,

California 94105–3901. While all

documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business

hours with the contact listed in the **FOR**

**FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT** section.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Nicole Law, EPA Region IX, (415) 947–

4126, law.nicole@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  This proposal addresses the following local rule: Placer County Air Pollution

Control District Rule 247 Natural GasFired Water Heaters, Small Boilers and

Process Heaters. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal Register, we are approving this local

rule in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe these

SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the

direct final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule.

We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in commenting should do so at this

time. If we do not receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further information, please

see the direct final action.

Dated: September 5, 2014.

Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

[FR Doc. 2014–23775 Filed 10–6–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**