alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.10**

**AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE**

**TO THE**

**REWARDS NETWORK INC.**

**2006 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN**

**WHEREAS**, Rewards Network Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and maintains the Rewards Network Inc.2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); 

**WHEREAS**, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) hasretained the power to amend the Plan; and 

**WHEREAS**,**** the Board has authorized the amendment of the Plan to comply with finalregulations issued under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). 

**NOW THEREFORE**,pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 8(e) of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2009, as follows: 

1. Section 2(h) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding “in accordance with Section 409A of the Code” immediately prior to the proviso set forth therein. 

2. Section 6(c)(i) of the Plan is hereby amended by adding the phrase “and permitted under Section 409A of the Code” immediatelyafter the phrase “except as provided in Section 7(a),” where it appears therein. 

3. Section 6(e)(i) of the Plan ishereby amended by adding “in accordance with Section 409A of the Code” at the end of the first sentence thereof. 

**IN WITNESS WHEREOF**, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorizedagent on this 31st day of December, 2008. 

 
REWARDS NETWORK INC.By: 
/s/ Ronald L. Blake

 

2
#### SULLIVAN v. STATE.

No. 16167.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 11, 1933.

Benjamin Kueera, of Lubbock, for appellant

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for robbery; punishment, seventeen years in the penitentiary.

Appellant was positively identified as the man who got into the car of J. W. Harris in Lubbock, Tex., in the daytime while Harris was waiting on a red light. Harris said appellant “pushed a gun in my stomach and said ‘Drive on Buddy.’ ” Harris drove on, and presently asked appellant if what he wanted was his money. Appellant told Harris to get out of the car, and continued to hold the gun on him while he walked around the car, and pointed the gun at him through the back window after Harris left the car. Appellant took the car and left with it. Later he was seen by other parties in possession of a car that answered the general description of the car appellant took from Harris. The car was found by Harris later in another town. Appellant’s only defense was an alibi testified to by several witnesses. The reconcilement of conflicts between the testimony of the state and the defense is a question for the jury, and in this case they have seen fit to accept the testimony of the state, and have returned a verdict in accordance therewith.

We find in the record no statement of facts or complaint of any matter of procedure, except that in his brief appellant vigorously urges that the court was in error in a part of his sentence, pointed out in the brief. We are in accord with appellant’s contention that said part of the sentence was erroneous, but do not agree that it was so wrong as to call for a reversal of the case. There was no testimony in the case showing that appellant had ever been convicted for any other offense, but for some reason the trial court incorporated in his sentence the following statement: “This sentence is to be cumulative of any other sentence that the defendant has or may have in the future, during the time of this sentence.” Such a statement is of no legal effect, and does not make the appellant’s sentence in this ease cumulative of any other named or described sentence, and of course can have no effect to accumulate this sentence with any other which might thereafter be entered upon any other conviction of the appellant. The sentence will bo reformed so as to direct appellant’s imprisonment in the penitentiary for not less than five, nor more than seventeen, years, and that he be remanded to jail, etc. That part of the sentence above quoted will be stricken out.

The judgment will be affirmed, with the sentence reformed as above stated.
### S1()-I()()3()5-()4. S

Februar y26,201 0

Th e Honorabl e Raymon d H . LaHoo d Secretar y U.S/De J3aH:meh to fTrahisportatlb n 120 0 Ne wJerse yAve , S E Washington , D C 2059 0 Docke t DOT-OST-2010-003 4 Dea rMr . Secretary : Than k yo u fo rth e opportunit yt o expres s m ysuppor tfo rth e applicatio n fo rantitrus t immunit yan d propose d join tbusines s agreemen tfile d b yAmerica n Airline s an d Japa n Airlines . Th e propose d allianc e betwee n thes e tw o airline s i s vita l fo rth e oneworl d allianc e t o compet e effectivel ywit h th e Sta ran d SkyTea m alliances . Thi s increase d allianc e competitio n wil l i n tur n enhanc e th e benefit s o fth e Department' s Ope n Skie s polic y- firs tb ysolidifyin g U.S . - Japa n Ope n Skies , the n b yservin g a s a foundatio n fo r furthe rliberalizatio n acros s Asia . Afte ra thoroug h review , I encourag e th e Departmen to fTransportatio n t o approv e thi s applicatio n a s i twoul d enabl e thes e oneworl d allianc e airline s t o wor k closel ytogethe r t o delive rhighl ycompetitiv e ai rtransportatio n services . Approva l fo rAA/JA Lallianc e wil l hav e a positiv e impac to n ai rtrave l b yofferin g customer s mor e service , schedulin g an d pricin g option s an d wil l hel p t o ensur e tha tcustomer s continu e t o benefi t fro m th e competitio n afforde d b ythre e competitiv e ai ralliances . RO . Drawe r 582 0 Lak e Charies, U 7060 6 phon e 337.477.605 1 &X337.478A82 6 www.flylahecharlesxoi n I urg e yo u t o quickl yapprov e thi s application . Sincerely , Heat h Alle n Executiv e Directo r' hallen(a>flylakecharles.co m
UNITED STATES AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

UNITED STATES

v.

Airman Basic CHAD E. SMITH

United States Air Force

ACM S32175

8 July 2014

Sentence adjudged 27 Aug 2013 by SPCM convened at Keesler Air Force 

Base, Mississippi. Military Judge: Shaun Speranza (sitting alone).

Approved Sentence: Bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 90 days.

Appellate Counsel for the Appellant: Captain Michael A. Schrama.

Appellate Counsel for the United States: Colonel Don M. Christensen; 

Major Daniel J. Breen; and Gerald R. Bruce, Esquire.

Before

ALLRED, MITCHELL, and WEBER

Appellate Military Judges

This opinion is subject to editorial correction before final release.

PER CURIAM:

The approved findings and sentence are correct in law and fact, and no error 

materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant occurred. Article 66(c), 

UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c); United States v. Reed, 54 M.J. 37, 41 (C.A.A.F. 2000). 

Accordingly, the approved findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT

LEAH M. CALAHAN

Deputy Clerk of the Court
##### 



Exhibit 10.3
 PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
       Reference to Plan
 Definitions




---



##### 



Benefit Percentage
 Vesting
 Normal or Early Retirement Date
 Termination Under the Employment Agreement
 Death or Disability
 Change in Control
 Cause
 - 2 -




---



##### 



Effect of Termination on SERP Benefit
 Normal Retirement Date
 Early Retirement Date
 Termination Under the Employment Agreement
 Death
 Disability
 Change in Control
 - 3 -




---



##### 



Cause
 Retiree Medical Benefits
 Tax Provisions
 Status of Participation Agreement
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Entire Agreement
 Severability
 Governing Law
 - 5 -




---



##### 



PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ATTEST:
    
    By
    /s/ Louis A. Raspino 
Louis A. Raspino
President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ W. Gregory Looser
    
    Date:
    March 15, 2007W. Gregory Looser
Secretary/s/ Rodney W. Eads
EXECUTIVEDate:
    March 15, 2007
 - 6 -
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, Laura Buss Sayavedra, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 8, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    LAURA BUSS
SAYAVEDRA                                                                                                                                                                          
|                       |  |  |  | Laura Buss Sayavedra Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP,
LLC General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP
General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3192 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3192

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement of 
integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan transactions under 
  the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in 
                  Lending Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homebuyers Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT SAFE HARBOR.

    The integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan 
transactions under section 4(a) of the Real Estate Settlement 
Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2603(a)), section 105(b) of the Truth 
in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1604(b)), and regulations issued under such 
sections may not be enforced against any person until February 1, 2016, 
and no suit may be filed against any person for a violation of such 
requirements occurring before such date, so long as such person has 
made a good faith effort to comply with such requirements.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                                 Clerk.
114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3192

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

    To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement of 
integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan transactions under 
  the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in 
                  Lending Act, and for other purposes.
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 358 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-723, K2024-16.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22645 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

 

I, Thomas Gutierrez, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GT Advanced Technologies Inc.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

 
| Date: June 17, 2014                  |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                      |   |
| /s/ THOMAS GUTIERREZ                      |   |
| Thomas Gutierrez                          |   |
| *President   and Chief Executive Officer* |   |

 

----
<PAGE>

MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 32.2 - CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Maxco, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Vincent Shunsky, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

      (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 13, 2004

                                                   /s/ Vincent Shunsky
                                                   -----------------------------
                                                   Vincent Shunsky
                                                   Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed July 3, 2024

. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for re hearing.

No. 3D24

- 809

Lower Tribunal No. F83

- 28927A



### Ricardo Valdez,

Appellant,

vs.



### The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from

the Circuit Court for Miami

- Dade County, Teresa Pooler, Judge.

Ricardo Valdez, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Befor e LOGUE, C.J., and FERNANDEZ and LOBREE, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3171 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3171

To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit certain research on 
   the transplantation of human fetal tissue obtained pursuant to an 
                               abortion.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 22, 2015

Mr. Sensenbrenner (for himself and Mr. Duffy) introduced the following 
    bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Public Health Service Act to prohibit certain research on 
   the transplantation of human fetal tissue obtained pursuant to an 
                               abortion.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. PROHIBITING CERTAIN RESEARCH ON THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN 
              FETAL TISSUE OBTAINED PURSUANT TO AN ABORTION.

    Section 498A(a) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 289g-
1(a)) is amended--
            (1) by amending paragraph (2) to read as follows:
            ``(2) Prohibition on use of tissue obtained pursuant to 
        abortions.--Human fetal tissue may be used in research carried 
        out under paragraph (1) only if the tissue is obtained pursuant 
        to a stillbirth.'';
            (2) in subsection (b)(2)--
                    (A) by striking subparagraph (A); and
                    (B) by redesignating subparagraphs (B) and (C) as 
                subparagraphs (A) and (B), respectively;
            (3) in subsection (c)(1)(B), by striking ``may have been 
        obtained pursuant to a spontaneous or induced abortion or 
        pursuant to a stillbirth'' and inserting ``has been obtained 
        pursuant to a stillbirth''; and
            (4) in subsection (g), by striking ``after a spontaneous or 
        induced abortion, or''.
                                 <all>
```
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 12-402 Date: July 26, 2012

Subject: 2012 Federal Benefits Open Season: Rider Information

This is the second in our series of 2012 Open Season Benefits Administration Letters (BAL). 

This BAL provides information on how to order the Guide to Federal Benefits. 

The Guide to Federal Benefits is the only Federal Benefits Open Season publication agencies 

must pay for and the only one agencies must order through the Government Printing Office 

(GPO) Rider. The other materials for the Federal Flexible Spending Account Program 

(FSAFEDS), the Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program (FEDVIP), and the 

Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program are free of charge to agencies. 

Attached is the 2012 Federal Benefits Open Season Rider. Your agency also should receive the 

rider through regular printing officer channels. Please note agencies may order the publications 

on the attached list by riding the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's requisition. Field and 

regional offices must submit their requirements to their department or agency’s Washington, DC, 

area headquarters printing office before the September 18, 2012 cutoff date. The headquarters 

office must submit the consolidated requisitions to the GPO by COB September 18, 2012. In 

order to provide products to our customers on a timely basis, we will not extend this cutoff date. 

We expect the Guides to begin shipping to agency distribution points on or before October 24, 

2012.

If you are the headquarters agency Benefits Officer and you do not know which customer service 

team at GPO is assigned to your agency, please call GPO on (202) 512-1239 or use the following 

link for information: http://www.gpo.gov/customers/nams.htm.

Note: Field and regional offices with questions regarding submitting requisitions to their agency 

printing officer should contact their agency headquarters Benefits Officer. Please follow the link 

for a directory of headquarters level agency benefits officers: http://apps.opm.gov/abo/.

When ordering the Guide to Federal Benefits, please consider this as a useful resource for new 

employees. The Guide includes important information about an employee’s overall benefit 

package. Therefore, order an amount sufficient for your new employees, benefit fairs, and 

ongoing employee needs. 
2

Remember, the 2012 Federal Benefits Open Season for the 2013 plan year runs from Monday, 

November 12 through Monday, December 10, 2012. 

Sincerely, 

 John O’Brien

Director 

Healthcare and Insurance