alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 117A/19 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 117A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4819 May 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 117A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4819 May 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | III   Notices |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2005/C 117A/2 | Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/5/05 to constitute a reserve of linguistic administrators (A*5) in the field of translation, having as their main language one of the following: Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and SlovakThis competition requires a university graduate level education and no professional experience | 3 |
| 2005/C 117A/3 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/6-7/05 to constitute a reserve of linguistic administrators (Heads of unit A*9 and A*12) in the field of translation, having as their main language one of the following: Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and SlovakThese competitions require a university graduate level education and at least 10 years professional experience | 16 |
| 2005/C 117A/4 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/8-16/05 to constitute a reserve of linguistic administrators (A*9 – senior conference interpreters) for the following languages: Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and SlovakThese competitions require a university graduate level education and at least 10 years professional experience | 32 |

Notice No

Contents

page

III   Notices

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2005/C 117A/2

Notice of open competition EPSO/AD/5/05 to constitute a reserve of linguistic administrators (A*5) in the field of translation, having as their main language one of the following: Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and SlovakThis competition requires a university graduate level education and no professional experience

EPSO/AD/5/05

3

2005/C 117A/3

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/6-7/05 to constitute a reserve of linguistic administrators (Heads of unit A*9 and A*12) in the field of translation, having as their main language one of the following: Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and SlovakThese competitions require a university graduate level education and at least 10 years professional experience

EPSO/AD/6-7/05

16

2005/C 117A/4

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/8-16/05 to constitute a reserve of linguistic administrators (A*9 – senior conference interpreters) for the following languages: Czech, Estonian, Hungarian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Polish, Slovene and SlovakThese competitions require a university graduate level education and at least 10 years professional experience

EPSO/AD/8-16/05

32

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 July 1, 2007
 PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-13289
(Commission File Number)
    
    76-0069030
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 5847 San Felipe, Suite 3300
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77057
(Zip Code)
 713) 789-1400
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors;
Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
  Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.
   2




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:

/s/
Brian C. VoegeleBrian C. VoegeleSenior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer  3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Summary of certain executive officer compensation arrangements
 4
#### CATES v. STATE.

No. 16890.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 6, 1934.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of robbery, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 35 years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No defect either in the indictment or procedure has been pointed out or has been perceived. No question is presented for review.

The judgment and sentence are improperly entered, in that they fail to take note of the Indeterminate Sentence Law as set forth in article 775, C. C. P. 1925, as amended by Acts 1931, c. 207 (Vernon’s Ann. C. O. P.-art. *604775). Tlie judgment and sentence will be reformed in that particular so as to declare that the appellant shall he confined in the penitentiary for a period of not less than five nor more than thirty-five years.

As reformed, the judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
<PAGE>

MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 23.2 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM--ERNST
& YOUNG LLP

            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statements (Forms
S-8 No. 33-48351 and S-8 No. 333-67539) pertaining to the Maxco, Inc. Incentive
Stock Option Plan and the Maxco, Inc. 1998 Stock Option Plan, and in the related
prospectus of our report dated June 11, 2003 with respect to the consolidated
financial statements of Maxco, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended March 31, 2004.

                                                           /S/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Detroit, Michigan
July 6, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Possis Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jules L. Fisher, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

October 13, 2006                         /s/      Jules L. Fisher
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                       Jules L. Fisher
                                       Chief Financial Officer



                                       67
ORIGINAL 

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 

PR 06-0544 

IN RE PETITION OF ROBERT C. GRIFFIN FOR 

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE 

BAR OF MONTANA 

ORDER 

Robert C. Griffin has petitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar of 

Montana. Griffin was placed on inactive status by the State Bar of Montana pursuant to 

Rules 3B2, 5, and 12 of the Rules for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) on July 1, 2024, 

as a result of noncompliance with CLE requirements. In accordance with Rule 13 of the 

CLE Rules, Griffin has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Griffm has now 

completed all CLE requirements "through the reporting year that ended March 31, 2024." 

The Petition indicates Griffin is actively practicing law in North Dakota and has 

been since May 8, 2013. Petitioner is or has not been: 1) suspended, disbarred, or otherwise 

ineligible to practice of law in another jurisdiction and is not currently subject to 

disciplinary proceedings' or pending disciplinary proceedings in another jurisdiction, 

2) charged with a criminal offense, 3) accrued delinquent debt or filed for bankruptcy, 

4) failed to fulfill the obligations of a public office or professional license, or 5) committed 

any violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause 

appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Robert C. Griffin for reinstatement 

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. 

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State 

Bar of Montana. 

I Lin—

DATED this ka-.1— day of August, 2024. 

FLED 

AUG - 6 2024 

Bowen Greenwooa 

Clerk of Suprerne Court 

State of Montana 

Chief Justice 

08/06/2024

Case Number: PR 06-0544
tderi-4%. 

2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 23-1321

ALLISON BLANCHARD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

ARLINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:21-cv-00649-TSE-IDD)

Submitted: November 16, 2023 Decided: November 21, 2023

Before AGEE and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

ON BRIEF: Kristen J. Farr, THE SPIGGLE LAW FIRM, P.C., Alexandria, Virginia, for 

Appellant. Heather K. Bardot, MCGAVIN, BOYCE, BARDOT, THORSEN & KATZ, 

P.C., Fairfax, Virginia; Virginia M. Sadler, COUNTY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, Arlington, 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1321 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/21/2023 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM:

Allison Blanchard appeals the district court’s order granting Defendant summary 

judgment on Blanchard’s discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to Title 

VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17; the American with 

Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 to 12213; and the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 

U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. 

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. Blanchard v. Arlington Cnty., Va., No. 

1:21-cv-00649-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. Feb. 24, 2023). We dispense with oral argument 

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this 

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

USCA4 Appeal: 23-1321 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/21/2023 Pg: 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 31



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Carl Horowitz, certify that:



1.  I have
  reviewed this report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, of Polymer Research Corporation of America;



2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4.  The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e)
 and 15d- 15(e)
) for the registrant and have:



a)
D esigned
 such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



b) (Intentionally omitted)



c )
E valuated
 the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5.  The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting
, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses
in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
 which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information
; and



b) Any
 fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date:  September
   25, 2003



By: /s/Carl Horowitz

Carl Horowitz

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. AP -77,000

EX P ARTE MARK

ANTHONY F LORES , Appli cant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 2010CR8783-W1 IN THE 226TH DIS TRICT COURT

F ROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisi o n s o f Ar t icle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded gu i l ty to theft, and was sentenc ed by

a jury to twenty year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appea l, beca use despite his continued expression of desire to a

ppeal, noticeof appe al was not timely filed. The trial court has deter

mined that Applicant was denied his right to appea l through no fault of his own. See E

x parte Riley , 193 S.W .3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) . We find that Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No.2

2010CR8783 from the 226th District Court of Be x ar County

. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which h e may g ive a written not ice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtai n a m ea n i n gfu l appea l. Within ten day s of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter mine whether Applicant is indig ent. I f Applica nt is indi g ent and wishe s to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appea l. All t i m e limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed on the date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosec ute an appeal, he must take aff irmative steps to file a wr itten notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 day s afte r the mandate of

this Court i ssues. Copies of this o pinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Criminal Justice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: Marc h 27, 2013 Do not publish
Exhibit 8.1



Subsidiaries of
Registrant



|Name                                                                                             | Place
of
        Incorporation
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ | ------------------------------
|Banco Santander (México), S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Santander México | Mexico                        
|Casa de Bolsa Santander, S.A. de C.V. Grupo Financiero Santander México                          | Mexico                        
|Santander Consumo, S.A. de C.V. SOFOMER. E.R.                                                    | Mexico                        
|Centro de Capacitación Santander, A.C. (formerly Instituto Santander Serfin, A.C.)               | Mexico                        
|Santander Servicios Corporativos, S.A. de C.V.                                                   | Mexico                        
|Santander Servicios Especializados, S.A. de C.V.                                                 | Mexico                        
|Santander Holding Vivienda, S.A. de C.V.                                                         | Mexico                        
|Santander Hipotecario, S.A. de C.V. SOFOM. E.R.                                                  | Mexico                        
|Santander Vivienda, S.A. de C.V. SOFOM. E.R.                                                     | Mexico                        
|Fideicomiso GFSSLPT, Banco Santander, S.A.                                                       | Mexico                        
|Banco Santander, S.A., Fideicomiso 100740                                                        | Mexico                        
|Fideicomiso Irrevocable No. F/00361 (HICOACB06U and HICOACB06-2U)                                | Mexico
# C_2015279EN.01003001.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2015 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v Commission

(Case T-536/11) (1)

((Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of computing services for the development and maintenance of software, consultancy and assistance for different types of IT applications - Ranking of a tenderer’s bid in the cascade for different lots and ranking of the bids of other tenderers - Obligation to state reasons - Award criterion - Manifest error of assessment - Non-contractual liability))

(2015/C 279/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Ettelbrück, Luxembourg); European Dynamics Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium); and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, M. Dermitzakis and N. Theologou, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by S. Delaude and V. Savov, and subsequently by S. Delaude, acting as Agents, and by O. Graber-Soudry, Solicitor)

Re:

Action for annulment of the decision of the Publications Office of the European Union of 22 July 2011 to rank the applicants, in respect of the bids they submitted in response to the call for tenders AO 10340, concerning the provision of computing services for the development and maintenance of software, consultancy and assistance for different types of IT applications (OJ 2011/S 66-106099), in the third place in the cascade for lot 1, in the third place in the cascade for lot 4 and in the second place in the cascade for lot 3, as well as the decisions awarding the contracts at issue to other tenderers in as much as they refer to their ranking, and, second, for damages.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 355, 3.12.2011.

---
# CE2004070EN.01018301.xml

| 20.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 70/183 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 70/183

---

(2004/C 70 E/192)

WRITTEN QUESTION P-2978/03

by Nelly Maes (Verts/ALE) to the Commission

(6 October 2003)

Subject:   Structural Funds in Brittany

Subject:

Following the French Government's recent budgetary decisions, Brittany will be hard hit by the withdrawal of government funding, which is jeopardising the payment of EU appropriations. It would appear that part of the Structural Funds allocated to Brittany for the period 2000-2006 will be blocked owing to the fact that the French Government is no longer willing to disburse the amounts it had previously undertaken to pay under the State-Region planning contract. This situation is giving particular cause for concern in the Lorient area, which is already facing a serious economic crisis as a result of the Navy's withdrawal and the conversion of the arsenal, and in the Brest, Trégor and west central Brittany areas.

Given that the Commission has always taken pains to ensure strict observance of the additionality principle, would it not agree that the decision to withdraw funding half-way through the period is in breach of this principle, and that the government's attitude is placing a region which is in need of strong support from Europe in a position of extreme economic and financial uncertainty?

Does the Commission intend to ask the French Government for an explanation? If it has already done so, what form did this action take?

Answer given by Mr Barnier on behalf of the Commission

(3 November 2003)

(3 November 2003)

The financing plan in the single programming document for structural assistance in the Brittany region for the period 2000-2006 provides for a contribution (national, regional or local) from the Member State of EUR 583 902 092 towards the total eligible cost of EUR 1 400 926 184 (including private funding). On 1 September 2003 the level of programming was 65 % of the total amount of the national public matching funds laid down in the SPD.

The Commission has no information on any withdrawal of funding by France entailing a reduction in the national public matching funding for the 2000-2006 SPD in Brittany.

A mid-term check of the Objective 2 programmes for compliance with the principle of additionality will be carried out, covering all the French Objective 2 programmes together but not each individual programme. The French authorities must provide the Commission with the relevant information by 31 December 2003. Independently of these checks, France must inform the Commission in the course of the programming period of any threat to its ability to maintain the level of expenditure laid down.

---
Exhibit 32.01  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Rostock Ventures Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Luis Carrillo, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)        The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/ Luis Carrillo By: Luis Carrillo Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Dated: August 16, 2010  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.