alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY      ACT OF 2002**

|                             |   |   |   |                                                     |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|                             |   | By:    |   | /s/                Zou Dejun                             |
|                             |   |   |   | Zou                Dejun, Chief Executive Officer        |
|                             |   |   |
| December                13, 2007 |   |   |   |                                                     |
|                             |   | By:    |   | /s/                Bruce Richardson                      |
|                             |   |   |   | Bruce                Richardson, Chief Financial Officer |
|                             |   |   |
| December                13, 2007 |   |   |   |                                                     |
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, (the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey Nugent, Chief Executive Officer of Sientra, Inc. (the Company),
hereby certifies that to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | The Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2017, to which
this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |  |  |  |  |                                     
|-------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ------------------------------------
|Date: April 30, 2018 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/ JEFFREY
NUGENT                  
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Jeffrey Nugent                      
|                     |  |  |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates,
is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Sientra, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
*Circuit Judge of the Ninth Circuit, sitting by designation.

*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________

No. 99-31390 

_______________________

NORTH WEST GEOMATICS CANADA, INC,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

ENGLAND JET CENTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

Civil Docket #1:98-CV-842

_________________________________________________________________

November 8, 2000

Before GOODWIN*, GARWOOD, and JONES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light

of the briefs, record excerpts, arguments and pertinent portions of

the record.

Having done so, we find no clear error in the district

court’s holding that appellant failed to prove lost profits in

accord with the test applicable in Louisiana. There was
2

insufficient evidence to support findings that the leased

aircraft’s lease would have been extended from April 9 through July

8; that another aircraft would have been sent to Venezuela to

perform the PITSA II contract; or that any other specific profit

opportunities were foregone after the loss of the leased aircraft.

We therefore do not reach the court’s findings concerning the

amount of lost profits. Additionally, the district court did not

abuse its discretion by refusing to allow appellant to amend its

complaint and assert a vicarious punitive damage claim, which is

both fact intensive and novel in Louisiana, only a few days before

trial.

For these reasons, the judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.
[No. 45154-5-I.

Division One.

December 26, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Thao D. Son, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 97-1-10192-8, Janice Niemi, J., entered August 16, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. §1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Swordfish Financial, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, in the capacities listed below, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:   April 15,  2011
/s/   Michael AlexanderMichael AlexanderChief Executive Officer(principal executive officer)














Dated:   April 15, 2011
/s/   Randy MoseleyRandy MoseleyChief Financial Officer(principal financial officer)








A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Swordfish Financial, Inc. and will be retained by Swordfish Financial, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22347]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary

[Docket ID: DoD-2022-OS-0113]


Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and 
Readiness (OUSD(P&R)), Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: 30-Day information collection notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On September 16, 2024, the DoD published a notice titled 
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request. Subsequent to publication 
of the notice, DoD is changing the title under the Title; Associated 
Form; and OMB Control Number in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section. 
All other information in the September 16, 2024, notice remains the 
same.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    The title under Title; Associated Form; and OMB Control Number in 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section in the notice that published in 
the Federal Register on September 16, 2024 (89 FR 75534-75535) is 
changed to read as follows:
    In FR Doc. 2024-21000, on page 75534 in the third column, correct 
the title to read: Addressing Barriers to Mental Health Care for 
Active-Duty Sexual Trauma Survivors.

    Dated: September 24, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-22347 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 11, 2006, (the Report), I, David
A. Remijas, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasPresident and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 11, 2006




18.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of B2 Health, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A-1 for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Quam, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  __/s/ John Quam____ John Quam Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer October 14, 2008
EXHIBIT 32.2



Certification of Principal Financial
Officer Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Of 2002



In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of Portsmouth
Square, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, David T. Nguyen, Treasurer and Controller of the Company, serving
as its Principal Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:



| | · | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | - | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | · | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David T. Nguyen

David T. Nguyen

Treasurer and Controller

(Principal Financial Officer)



Date: August 24, 2012





A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 4511** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v.
FIDEL ANDRADE

- HERNANDEZ , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina , at Greensboro
. Catherine C. Eagles , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cr - 00446

- CCE

- 1 )

Submitted : January 3, 2014 Decided: January 15, 2014

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and WYNN , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Louis C. Allen III, Federal Public Defender, Mireille P. Clough, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Winston

- Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Kyle D. Pousson, Assistant United States Attorney, Gr eensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM : Fidel Andrade

- Hernandez appeals the sentenc e of twelve months and one day of imprisonment imposed by the district court after he pled g uilty to illegally re

- entering the United States following removal , in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) (2012). On appeal, Andrade

- Hernandez argues that the district court abused its discretion by declin ing to order his federal sentence
to run concurrently with an anticipated state sentence on an unrelated state charge pending at the time of his federal sentencing. We affirm. Under 18 U.S.C. § 3584 (2012) , a district court retains the discretion to run a federal sentence concurrently with or consecutivel y to an anticipated state sentence. See Setser v. United States , 132 S. Ct. 1463, 1468 (2012). In deciding whether to run a sentence concurrently or consecutively to another sentence, the court must consider the factors in 18
U.S.C. § 3553(a) (2012) . 18 U.S.C. § 3584(b). Here, the district court stated only that it would not recommend that Andrade

- Hernandez’s federal sentence run concurrently with the anticipated state sentenc e . The district court, after concluding that it lacked information about the pending state charge, found that the state court was in a better position to determine whether the sentences (if indeed there is a conviction and sentence on the state charge) should run concurrently or3 consecutively. The district court’s approach is consistent with
Setser
. See 132 S. Ct. at 1472 n.6 ( “ [A] district court should exercise the power to impose anticipatory consecutive (or concurrent) sentences intelligently. In some situations, a district court may have inadequate information and may fo rbear

. . . .” ) . Because the district court made its determination after considering Andrade

- Hernandez’s arguments and fully understood the scope of its discretion, we conclude that the district court did not abuse that discretion when it declined to orde r Andrade

- Hernandez’s federal sentence to run concurrently with his anticipated state sentence. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                           8,527
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,864
<ALLOWANCES>                                       217
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,308
<PP&E>                                          11,880
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,541
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,700
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            9,671
<BONDS>                                          1,728
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,750
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,780
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,700
<SALES>                                            360
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,704
<CGS>                                              316
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,295
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,309
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   100
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  40
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,104
<INCOME-TAX>                                       469
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                635
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       635
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
        

</TABLE>
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Gas Turbine Engines, Inc. ) ) Under Contract No. W58RGZ-12-D-0167 ) APPEARANCE FORTHE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCA No. 59627

Mr. George Tobon

President Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney Frank A. March, Esq.

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. Dated: 9 February 2016

Administrative Judge Acting Chairman Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCA No. 59627, Appeal ofGas Turbine Engines, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals
EXHIBIT 32f

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                            OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

      I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Power LLC, to the
best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSEG Power LLC on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of PSEG
Power LLC.


                                        /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        THOMAS M. O'FLYNN
                                        PSEG Power LLC
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        February 27, 2007
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 7153-018]
 On April 29, 2022, Consolidated Hydro New York, LLC filed a relicense application for the 1.656-megawatt Victory Mills Hydroelectric Project (Victory Mills Project or project; FERC No. 7153). The project is located on Fish Creek in Saratoga County in the Village of Victory, New York. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on June 28, 2024, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to relicense the project.[1] The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members, and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or 
                    *OPP@ferc.gov.* The application will be processed according to the following schedule. The EA will be issued for a 30-day comment period. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
September 24, 2025.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Silvia Pineda-Munoz at (202) 502-8388 or 
                    *Silvia.Pineda-Munoz@ferc.gov.* Dated: September 25, 2024. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Acting Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating to this environmental review is EAXX-019-20-000-1727252162. 40 CFR 1501.5(c)(4) (2024). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-22486 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2023163EN.01000401.xml

| 8.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 163/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 163/4

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10759 – GIP / MERIDIAM / VEOLIA (HAZARDOUS WASTE BUSINESS))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 163/03)

On 28 October 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10759. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10759. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---