alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

Calendar No. 257 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 323 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, Missouri, as 

the ‘‘Sgt. Amanda N. Pinson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SGT. AMANDA N. PINSON POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, 

6 Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. 

7 Amanda N. Pinson Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 323 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sgt. Amanda N. 

5 Pinson Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 257 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 323 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostPost Office’’. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Sgt. Amanda N. Pinson al Service located at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Reported without amendment 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Exhibit








Exhibit  10.1




The St. Joe Company 
Board of Directors 
Compensation Program for 
Non-Employee Directors 


	
		
	Compensation 
Components 
	 

	Board Member Retainer 
	$75,000 annual cash retainer 

	Board Member Annual Equity Grant 
	$50,000 annual equity grant in the form of shares of restricted stock (provided that the company will not issue fractional shares and will grant the number of whole shares of common stock calculated to equal the grant value as closely as possible), which shares vest on the date of the company’s next annual meeting and are subject to forfeiture upon termination of service on the Board prior to that annual meeting; each director may elect to receive their annual equity grant in cash in lieu of stock

	Chairman Retainer 
	$25,000 for Chairman of the Board 

	Committee Chair Retainers 
	$25,000 for Audit; $25,000 for Comp, $25,000 for Governance and Nominating and $50,000 for Executive

	Miscellaneous 
	We reimburse directors for travel expenses related to attending Board and committee meetings and for other company related business. In certain circumstances, we will pay the costs for directors to fly on a private airplane to attend Board and committee meetings or for other company business. We may also invite director spouses to accompany directors to some of our Board meetings, for which we pay or reimburse travel expenses. In addition, we reimburse directors for seminar fees and travel expenses associated with attending one approved educational seminar each year. 

	Charitable Matching Program 
	We have chosen to support the charitable and civic activities of our directors. We will match each director’s cash contributions to charities in which he serves as an officer or trustee up to an aggregate annual amount of $5,000 per director. We will also contribute to events at which directors are recognized for their services to charitable or civic causes. 

	Waiver of Compensation 
	We understand that Bruce R. Berkowitz, who serves as Chairman of our Board of Directors, has determined to waive his rights to receive any compensation for service on the Board in 2017.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3076 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to increase the number of base 

acres upon which agricultural producers are authorized to grow fruits 

and vegetables without a resulting reduction in payment acres on their 

farm when the resulting produce is used to help alleviate a food desert, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Ms. KELLY of Illinois introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Agriculture 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to increase the 

number of base acres upon which agricultural producers 

are authorized to grow fruits and vegetables without 

a resulting reduction in payment acres on their farm 

when the resulting produce is used to help alleviate a 

food desert, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Feeding America 

5 through Farm Flexibility Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3076 IH

1 SEC. 2. PRODUCER DISCRETION TO PLANT ADDITIONAL 

2 FRUITS AND VEGETABLES ON BASE ACRES 

3 WITHOUT A RESULTING REDUCTION IN PAY4 MENT ACRES. 

5 Section 1114(e) of the Agricultural Act of 2014 (7 

6 U.S.C. 9014(e)) is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing new paragraph: 

8 ‘‘(5) PRODUCER DISCRETION TO PLANT ADDI9 TIONAL FRUITS AND VEGETABLES TO ALLEVIATE

10 FOOD DESERTS.— 

11 ‘‘(A) ADDITIONAL PLANTING AUTHORITY; 

12 PURPOSE.—The percentages specified in para13 graphs (2) and (3) are increased by an addi14 tional five percent of base acres, to 20 percent 

15 and 40 percent respectively, if the crops re16 ferred to in paragraph (1) grown on the addi17 tional base acres are grown solely for sale or 

18 donation, directly or indirectly by the producer 

19 and with or without processing, in a food 

20 desert. 

21 ‘‘(B) FOOD DESERT DEFINED.—In this 

22 paragraph, the term ‘food desert’ means a cen23 sus tract that, as determined by the Sec24 retary— 

25 ‘‘(i) has a poverty rate of 20 percent 

26 or greater; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3076 IH

1 ‘‘(ii) provides difficult access to a re2 tail outlet that provides a wide variety of 

3 fruits and vegetables.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### PINKSTON v. STATE.

No. 17497.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 10, 1935.

See, also, 69 S.W.(2d) 60.

Morriss & Morriss; of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State..

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for murder without malice; punishment being three years in the penitentiary..

The prosecution originated in Kinney county, but the trial was in Val Verde county on a change of venue.

Exception was reserved to the court’s refusal to give a peremptory instruction to acquit ; likewise we find in the record many objections to the court’s charge. No statement of facts is found in the record. Manifestly, in the absence of the facts, the complaints adverted to cannot be appraised.

No error is apparent from the record.

The judgment is affirmed.
From: Pugh, Theresa [mailto:TPugh@publicpower.org] 

Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2014 6:19 PM 

To: Mabel Echols (mabel_e.echols@omb.eop.gov) 

Cc: Nipper, Joe; Waterhouse, Desmarie; Wayland, Robertj; Page, Steve; Tsirigotis, Peter; 

Kurlansky, Ellen; Culligan, Kevin 

Subject: Meeting request: Docket not yet assigned (NSPS for Existing Power Plants) 

Ms. Mabel Echols 

OMB 

Dear Ms. Echols: 

I am writing to request an appointment with the Office of OMB’s OIRA team assigned to the existing 

plant rulemaking on New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) regarding Existing Power Plants. 

The proposed rule is at OMB now but there is no docket number assigned to it. (The NEW plant 

docket number is EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495). 

 

I am writing on behalf of the 2,000 members of American Public Power Association (APPA). These 

are the municipal and state owned electric utilities affected by the pending CO2 regulations at the 

EPA. 

APPA staff would like to meet with OMB and the members of the inter-agency review from EPA, CEA, 

CEQ, DOE and U. S. Small Business Administration. APPA has already met with EPA employees 

about our concerns. We are specifically seeking to discuss possible ways that the existing power 

plant regulation could affect our electric utilities, the city governments, their investments in power 

plants, and with specific information on electricity costs to the consumer. 

We request an appointment on one of the following days (in this order of preference due to possible 

schedule problems on Monday and Friday) 

Tuesday, May 6 

Wednesday, May 7 

Thursday, May 8 

(Friday, May 9) 

(Monday, May 5) 

We hope you can select a meeting room that has video or audio phone set up for the EPA OAQPS 

employees if they cannot be at the meeting. We know that you often have them join in by phone. 

By copying key EPA staff, I am informing them of our request. We hope that they will be able to 

attend. 

Thank you very much, 

Theresa 

Theresa Pugh 

Director, Environmental Services 

American Public Power Association (APPA) 

1875 Connecticut Ave, NW 

Suite 1200 

Washington, DC 20009 
Direct 202 467 2943 

Fax 202 495-7443
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2879 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2879

 To include Livingston County, the city of Jonesboro in Union County, 
and the city of Freeport in Stephenson County, Illinois, to the Lincoln 
            National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 24, 2015

 Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois (for himself, Mr. Shimkus, Mr. Rodney Davis 
of Illinois, Mrs. Bustos, and Mr. Bost) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To include Livingston County, the city of Jonesboro in Union County, 
and the city of Freeport in Stephenson County, Illinois, to the Lincoln 
            National Heritage Area, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Abraham Lincoln National Heritage 
Area Amendment Act''.

SEC. 2. ADJUSTMENT OF BOUNDARIES OF LINCOLN NATIONAL HERITAGE AREA.

    (a) Boundary Adjustment.--Section 443(b)(1) of the Consolidated 
Natural Resources Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-229; 16 U.S.C. 461 note) 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, Livingston,'' after ``LaSalle''; and
            (2) by inserting ``, the city of Jonesboro in Union County, 
        and the city of Freeport in Stephenson County'' after 
        ``Woodford counties''.
    (b) Map.--The Secretary of the Interior shall update the map 
referred to in section 443(b)(2) of the Consolidated Natural Resources 
Act of 2008 to reflect the boundary adjustment made by the amendments 
in subsection (a) of this section.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit 31.4

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Ramesh Srinivasan, certify that:

| 1. | I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Agilysys, Inc.; |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Dated: July 29, 2020

 

| By:    |   | /s/ Ramesh Srinivasan                 |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   |   | Ramesh Srinivasan                     |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
1

**Technical Assistant Needs Assessment Questionnaire** Submitted with ICR 2470.01 │ OMB 2050
- NEW │ Technical Assistance Needs Assessments (TANAs) at Superfund Remedial or Removal Sites (NEW) 1. How have you been involved with the community during the Superfund cleanup process? 2. Does your organization have any current, past, or future responsibilities at the site? 3. How would you describe the community’s relationship with the EPA and the state (if applicable) during the Superfund cleanup process? 4. Has the communi ty been receiving sufficient technical information from EPA? Has this information been clear and easy

-to - understand? If not, describe the areas where you believe the community may need assistance understanding and responding to information about the site. 5. From the community’s perspective, what could prevent the Superfund cleanup process from moving forward? What could EPA potentially do to address this situation? 6. What are the issues or areas in which the community may require assistance in order to partic ipate meaningfully in the Superfund decision

- making process? 7. What type of assistance do you believe would be most helpful? 8. Are you aware of the types of technical assistance from EPA that may be available to the community? (If so, please tell me what you understand to be available to the community). 9. Has the community previously received technical assistance (e.g., TAG, TASC, TAB, TAP, or TOSC)? a. If so, what community group received the assistance on behalf of the community? b. What were the benefits and limi tations of this assistance? 10. What are the existing organizations in the community that are involved in site issues or which tend to be the “go

-to” groups for community members interested in site issues or related concerns? a. Are these organizations represent ative of, or have the ability to reach, all parts of the affected community? b. Are these groups effective in listening to the community and providing a voice to all segments of the community? c. Do these organizations have a robust membership, have a defined strategic plan, request input from the broader community, or have an effective relationship with the local press? d. Are there organizations within the community that have competing interests or are highly divisive? e. Are there particular community members or stakeholders affected by the site who may need additional assistance understanding site information and what it may mean to them? Are these stakeholder groups reached by existing organizations that serve the broader community?2

11. What other stakeholders would you recommend we speak with in completing this technical assistance needs assessment? 12. Is there any other pertinent information you would like to share with us at this time?
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 August 9, 2007
 PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-13289
(Commission File Number)
    
    76-0069030
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 5847 San Felipe, Suite 3300
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77057
(Zip Code)
 713) 789-1400
 
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement
    2




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:
    /s/ W. Gregory LooserW. Gregory LooserSenior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  3
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned hereby certifies that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of Southern Bella, Inc. (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in such Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: May 13, 2011/s/ Michael DavisChief Executive OfficerChief Financial Officer




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Southern Bella, Inc. and will be retained by Southern Bella, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 1, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (“IEEE”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 46 new standards have been initiated, and 19 existing standards are being revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at:                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​sasb/​sba/​20may2024/​, https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​sasb/​sba/​06jun2024/​.*                     The following pre-standards activities associated with IEEE Industry Connections Activities were launched or renewed:                     *https://standards.ieee.org/​about/​bog/​cag/​approvals/​june2024/​.*

                    On September 17, 2004, the IEEE filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 11, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 52090).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-22058 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
##### 



Exhibit 3.1
 CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
RESOLUTE ENERGY PARTNERS, LP
  Name.
 Registered Office; Registered Agent.
 
  
 General Partner.
 
  RESOLUTE ENERGY GP, LLC, by its Manager,RESOLUTE HOLDINGS SUB, LLCBy:
    /s/ James M. PicconeJames M. Piccone, PresidentAuthorized Person
#### HIGGINS v. STATE.

No. 20404.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1939.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for turkey theft; punishment is assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of 1 year.

*902The record is before us without hills of exceptions or statement of facts. The indictment is sufficient to charge the offense and procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### KRAUSE et al. v. KESSLER et al.

No. 10185.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 17, 1937.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1938.

L. D. Stroud and Wade & Wade, all of Beeville, for appellants.

O. Kennedy, of Beeville, for appellees.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

Mrs. S. S. Severn owns certain land in Bee county and gave the use of the land to her sister, Mrs. Edith Krause, a married woman, for the crop year of 1933. The *343land was planted to broom corn for that year, and the crop harvested therefrom was levied upon and sold under an execution to satisfy a judgment rendered in favor of V. E. Kessler and against Mrs. Krause’s husband. Mrs. Krause brought this suit against Kessler for damages upon the theory that the. seized crop was her separate property, or personal earnings, and she sought to recover of Kessler as for conversion. From a judgment based upon a directed verdict against her, Mrs. Krause has appealed.

Mrs. Krause, appellant, contends that the crop in law constituted rents derived from her separate estate, or, in the alternative, her personal earnings, and that, under.the statute, it could not be subjected to the payment of her- husband’s (community) debts, as was done. Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. art. 4616.

The record shows, in effect, that the land was planted and cultivated, and the crops harvested and marketed, by the joint efforts, labor, and funds of the Krause family, and under that state of facts the resulting product was properly subject, as the trial court held, to payment of the debt of the husband incurred in behalf of the community. First Nat. Bank v. Davis, Tex.Com.App., 5 S.W. 2d 753.

The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

Appellant has filed a very vigorous and earnest motion for rehearing, in deference to which we have again reviewed the record, with particular reference to the specific contentions of appellant, and see no reason for receding from the original disposition.

The case actually presented in the record seems to be a simple one, out - of which arose the controlling question of whether the proceeds of a crop grown on land the use of which for that particular crop year was given by the -owner, as a gift, to Mrs. Krause, individually, constituted her separate property. The crop was planted, cultivated, and harvested by Mrs. Krause and her husband and children, and by laborers employed by her and paid by her out of a part of the proceeds of a loan obtained by her husband upon the community estate. There was no tracing of funds or efforts which could be given the effect of converting the proceeds of the crop from its presumed character of community property, into the claimed character of the wife’s separate property. Appellant raises some very interesting questions of law, and presents them with much ability and ingenuity, but the case actually made is the simple one, disposed of in the original opinion, to which we adhere.

Appellant’s motion for rehearing is overruled.