alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           1,407
<SECURITIES>                                 2,213,584
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,312
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (584)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,606,799
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           44,573
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           318
<OTHER-SE>                                     522,926
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,606,799
<SALES>                                         32,226
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               242,206
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               163,337
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 71,745
<INCOME-TAX>                                    22,521
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,224
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,224
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.53
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, P. Morgan McCune, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Triple A Medical, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: October 26, 2007















/s/ P. Morgan McCune







P. Morgan McCune









Chief Financial Officer
|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 1 | I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of Ally Auto Receivables Trust 2012-3 (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”); |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 2 | Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 3 | Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports; |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 4 | Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and |

|   |
|---|
|   |  |
| 5 | All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K. |

|                                                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                               |  |
| /s/ Ryan C. Farris                                            |   |
|                                                          |
| Ryan C. Farris                                                |
| President, Ally Auto Assets LLC, as Depositor                 |
| (Senior Officer in charge of securitization of the depositor) |
Exhibit 16.1











March 25, 2015




Alberta Securities Commission
 British Columbia Securities Commission
 Saskatchewan Securities Commission
 Manitoba Securities Commission
 Ontario Securities Commission
 New Brunswick Securities Commission
 Nova Scotia Securities Commission
 Prince Edward Island Securities Commission
 Newfoundland Securities Commission
 TSX Venture Exchange
  Attention: Continuous Disclosure
 
 Dear Sir/Mesdames:
 
 Re:           Hunt Mining Corp. - Change of Auditors
 Notice Pursuant to Part 4.11 of National Instrument 51-102
  We have read the statements made by Hunt Mining Corp. in the attached copy of change of auditor notice dated March 23, 2015, which we understand will be filed pursuant to Section 4.11 of National Instrument 51-102.
  We agree with the statements in the change of auditor notice dated March 23, 2015, except that our resignation was requested on January 20, 2015.
  Yours very truly,
    
      Image
ACCOUNTING > CONSULTING > TAX

1500, 640 - 5TH AVENUE SW, CALGARY AB, T2P 3G4

1.877.500.0792  P: 403.263.3385   F: 403.269.8450   MNP.ca
# Official Journal C 234I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 234I |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6417 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 234I

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6417 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 234 I/01 | Council Decision of 14 June 2021 appointing one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) for the Netherlands | 1 |
| 2021/C 234 I/02 | Council Decision of 14 June 2021 appointing one member and one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) for Latvia | 3 |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 234 I/03 | Commission Decision of 12 May 2021 establishing the European Research Council for Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and innovation and repealing Decision C(2013)8915 | 5 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 234 I/01

Council Decision of 14 June 2021 appointing one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (Eurofound) for the Netherlands

1

2021/C 234 I/02

Council Decision of 14 June 2021 appointing one member and one alternate member of the Management Board of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) for Latvia

3

European Commission

2021/C 234 I/03

Commission Decision of 12 May 2021 establishing the European Research Council for Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and innovation and repealing Decision C(2013)8915

5

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 8 , 2016

NO. 03

- 14

- 00375

- CV

Aus p ro Enterprises, LP, Appellant

v.

Texas Department of Transportation, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 345TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE C HIEF JUSTICE ROSE, J USTICES PEMBERTON AN D FIELD
REVERSED AND RENDERED ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

– OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the di strict court on March 17, 2013. We deny

the Department’ s motion for rehearing and order that the opinion and judgment dated August 26,

2016, are withdrawn. Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds

that there was reversible e rror in the district court’s judgment

. We t herefore r everse the district

court’s judgment and render judgment severing Su bchapters B and C from the Texas Highway

Beautification Act as unconstitutional content

- based restrictions on sp eech

. The appellee shall

pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and the court below.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3172 

To amend the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act to provide for 

State and tribal management and protection of wild free-roaming horses 

and burros, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2015 

Mr. STEWART introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act 

to provide for State and tribal management and protection of wild free-roaming horses and burros, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Wild Horse Oversight 

5 Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3172 IH

1 SEC. 2. STATE AND TRIBAL MANAGEMENT AND PROTEC2 TION OF WILD FREE-ROAMING HORSES AND 

3 BURROS. 

4 Public Law 92–195 (commonly known as the ‘‘Wild 

5 Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act’’) is amended by 

6 adding at the end the following: 

7 ‘‘SEC. 12. STATE AND TRIBAL MANAGEMENT AND PROTEC8 TION. 

9 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided by subsection 

10 (b), at the request of the legislature or Governor of a State 

11 or the governing body of a federally recognized Indian 

12 tribe, the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 

13 Agriculture shall allow the State or federally recognized 

14 Indian tribe to assume all management and protection 

15 functions under this Act regarding wild free-roaming 

16 horses and burros on land within the boundaries of the 

17 State or federally recognized Indian tribe. After a State 

18 or federally recognized Indian tribe assumes such func19 tions, wild free-roaming horses and burros shall be man20 aged by the State or federally recognized Indian tribe in 

21 accordance with this Act and in the same manner as any 

22 other non-federally regulated species regarding functions 

23 not specified in this Act. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3172 IH

1 ‘‘(b) INVENTORY.—The Secretary concerned shall 

2 continue to maintain the inventory required by section 

3 3(b)(1).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2014421EN.01003201.xml

| 24.11.2014 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 421/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.11.2014

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 421/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 October 2014 — Fuchs v OHIM — Les Complices (Star within a circle)

Star within a circle

(Case T-342/12) (1)

1

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark representing a star within a circle - Earlier Community and national figurative marks representing a star within a circle - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Distinctive character of the earlier mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Revocation of the earlier Community mark - Continued interest in bringing proceedings - Failure to find that there was no need to adjudicate in part))

2014/C 421/43

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Max Fuchs (Freyung, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Les Complices SA (Montreuil-sous-Bois, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 May 2012 (Case R 2040/2011-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Les Complices SA and Max Fuchs.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Max Fuchs to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Max Fuchs to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 295, 29.9.2012.

1

---
1

Troutman, Jake (FAA)

From: Troutman, Jake (FAA)

Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 9:46 AM

To: 'Jordan S'

Cc: Pappas, Rob (FAA)

Subject: Request for Additional Information - Schultz ATM

Mr. Jordan Schultz,  

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA‐2015‐

0719).  This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.  

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type(s)(i.e. ‐ fixed‐wing,rotorcraft, lighter‐than‐air) for the

proposed UAS operation.  The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including

payload).  This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non‐proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov and submit

any proprietary information to the FAA Headquarters or electronically via e‐mail to

333exemptions@faa.gov.  If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information

described above by 6/2/2015.  If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying

you further.  

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267‐9521.  

Sincerely,

Jake J Troutman

Program Analyst | Rulemaking

FAA Office of Aviation Safety

Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

202‐267‐9521
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consentto the use in this Amendment No. 3 to Registration Statement No.333-140599 of Quicksilver Gas Services LP on Form S-1 ofour report dated February 9, 2007 (June 12,2007 as to paragraph 1 of Note 2) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes anexplanatory paragraph relating to the preparation of the financial statements of Quicksilver GasServices Predecessor from the separate records maintained by Quicksilver Resources Inc.) relatingto the financial statements of Quicksilver Gas Services Predecessor and to our reports datedFebruary 9, 2007 relating to the balance sheets of Quicksilver Gas Services LP and Quicksilver GasServices GP LLC, appearing in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Prospectus./s/Deloitte & Touche LLP
#### RAGSDALE v. STATE.

No. 14046.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1931.

Rehearing Denied April 8, 1931.

Alex P.- Pope and Truman Warren, both of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State's Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

The unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.

The indictment is regular and regularly presented. The motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given on July 8th. Ninety days were allowed within which to prepare and file the statement of facts and bills of exception, which time expired on October 7, 1930. The bills of exception found in the record were filed October 11th, and the' statement of facts filed October 21,1930, both of which dates were more than ninety days after the motion for new trial was overruled. By the statute, article 760, C. C. P., this court is precluded from considering either the statement of facts or the bills of exception.

The judgment and sentence fail to taire note of the Indeterminate Sentence Law. The judgment should condemn the appellant to confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of not less than one nor more than two years. The judgment is reformed to that effect, and, as reformed, it is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, J.

Article 775 of our Code of Criminal Procedure, providing for the indeterminate sentence, makes no reference to the form of the judgment in the court below. In our original opinion directing that the terms of said statute be complied with, we ordered that the judgment be reformed, but failed to make the-same order as to the sentence. The sentence pronounced against appellant will be corrected so as that he will be therein sentenced to not less than one nor more than two years in the penitentiary. Further than this the motion for rehearing will be overruled.
#### ROE v. STATE.

No. 20472.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 14, 1939.

Ted Sisco, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of' Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile upon the public highway while intoxicated; punishment assessed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for five days.

The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judge of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved'by the Court.
Exhibit 32.1








CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)








In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Mines, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Wilson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.








Registrant



Date: August 16, 2010

United Mines, Inc.



By: /s/ Glenn E. MartinGlenn E. MartinChief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
**EXHIBIT    31.2**     I, Ben Harper certify that:     1. I have reviewed this report on    Form 10-K    of Friedman Industries, Incorporated;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any    untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material    fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the    circumstances under which such statements were made, not    misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and    other financial information included in this report, fairly    present in all material respects the financial condition,    results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of,    and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure    controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act    Rules 13a-15(e)    and    15d-15(e))    for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or    caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed    under our supervision, to ensure that material information    relating to the registrant, including its consolidated    subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those    entities, particularly during the period in which this report is    being prepared;     b) [intentionally omitted per SEC release 33-8238]     c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s    disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report    our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure    controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by    this report based on such evaluation; and     d) Disclosed in this report any change in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that    occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter    (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an    annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably    likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal    control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I    have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal    control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s    auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board    of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in    the design or operation of internal control over financial    reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the    registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and    report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves    management or other employees who have a significant role in the    registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Dated: June 28, 2007 /s/  Ben    Harper            *Senior Vice President — Finance and**Secretary/Treasurer*