alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
35.1

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE

BARCLAYS DRYROCK ISSUANCE TRUST





In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Barclays Dryrock Issuance Trust for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 (the “Report”), the undersigned,
a duly authorized officer of Barclays Bank Delaware (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:



1. A review of the activities and performance
of the Servicer under the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, as amended and restated as of December
17, 2013, by and among Barclays Dryrock Funding LLC, the Servicer, Barclays Dryrock Issuance Trust and U.S. Bank National Association
(the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.



2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that
is the subject of the Report.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly
executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 17th of March 2017.



| | BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
| | ----------------------
| |                       
| | By:                   
| |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22690]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 25, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 363 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-744, K2024-37.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22690 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 327 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-665, CP2024-674.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21364 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 357 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-717, K2024-10.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22643 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# Official Journal C 68/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 68 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6426 February 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 68

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6426 February 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | III   Preparatory acts |
| | COUNCIL |
| 2021/C 68/01 | Position (EU) No 1/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (recast)Adopted by the Council on 25 January 2021 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2021/C 68/02 | Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 1/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (recast) | 47 |

Contents

page

III   Preparatory acts

COUNCIL

2021/C 68/01

Position (EU) No 1/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (recast)Adopted by the Council on 25 January 2021 (
  1
  )

1

1

2021/C 68/02

Statement of the Council’s reasons: Position (EU) No 1/2021 of the Council at first reading with a view to the adoption of a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on rail passengers’ rights and obligations (recast)

47

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
#### TEXAS STATE LIFE INS. CO. v. APARICIO et al.

No. 13688.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

June 7, 1939.

Lawyers Lloyds of Texas, of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.

C. C. Bryant and Brown & Criss, all of Harlingen, for defendants in error.

SMITH, Chief Justice.

On May 17, 1939, this Court granted' defendants in error’s motion to affirm on certificate, upon a partial transcript of the record embracing only the judgment of the court below, petition, bond and citation in error, officer’s return, and bill of costs incurred below. Subsequently, on May 20th, defendants in error filed this motion to assess damages on the certificate, against plaintiff in error for delay, as provided in Arts. 18S7 and 1860, R.S.1925. The motion must be overruled.

It has always been the rule in this State that a motion, such as this, for damages for delay, or for frivolous appeal, has the effect of opening up the entire record in the case, requiring the appellate court to ■ inspect the record and notice any errors, whether assigned or not, and to assess damages only in the event no error is discoverable, and then only if thé court concludes from the whole record that the appeal was not taken in good faith, but for delay only. 2 Tex.Jur. pp. 1135, 1136, §§ 798, 799; Riggs v. Horde, 25 Tex. Supp. 456, 78 Am.Dec. 584; Hunt v. Askew, 46 Tex. 247; Ramey v. Phillips, Tex.Civ.App., 253 S.W. 323; Granberry v. Jackson, 62 Tex.Civ.App. 597, 132 S.W. 508; Floboots Corp. v. Teas, Tex.Civ.App., 110 S.W.2d 180; Levine v. Cullum Boren Co., Tex.Civ.App., 253 S.W. 894; Oilmen’s Reciprocal Ass’n v. Coe, Tex.Civ.App., 6 S.W.2d 1046; Rose v. Brantley, Tex.Civ.App., 262 S.W. 193.'

So is it held by the same authorities that in order to secure the benefit of the statute it is necessary for the moving party to file a complete record of the proceedings in the case below, if none is otherwise filed.

It was held in Hunt v. Askew, supra, and urged in a dissenting opinion in Ramey v. Phillips, supra, that in order to avail himself of the statute the appellee or defendant in error, as the case may be, should file a complete record within the ■ time prescribed by law for filing records, *795but it is not necessary to go so far in this case.

We do hold, however, that, even if it was, not then too late to tender a full record, defendant in error should have tendered such with his motion to affirm on certificate and asked for damages then and thereon, and it is now too late, after the order granting affirmance on certificate has become final, to move for damages for delay, even though the full record were available, which it is not. 3 Tex.Jur. p. 1135, § 798; Ramey v. Phillips, supra; Granberry v. Jackson, supra.

• In any event, defendants in error have asked for damages for delay upon an incomplete record, from which this Court cannot determine the good faith of plaintiff in error in perfecting writ of error. That being the case, the motion for damages must be denied.

It is so ordered.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Defense

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [Docket ID: DoD-2022-OS-0113]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness (OUSD(P&R)), Department of Defense (DoD).

# ACTION:

30-Day information collection notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        On September 16, 2024, the DoD published a notice titled Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request. Subsequent to publication of the notice, DoD is changing the title under the                         *Title; Associated Form; and OMB Control Number*                         in the                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section. All other information in the September 16, 2024, notice remains the same.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Patricia Toppings, 571-372-0485.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    The title under                     *Title; Associated Form; and OMB Control Number*                     in the                     **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                     section in the notice that published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 16, 2024 (89 FR 75534-75535) is changed to read as follows:                

In FR Doc. 2024-21000, on page 75534 in the third column, correct the title to read: Addressing Barriers to Mental Health Care for Active-Duty Sexual Trauma Survivors.

Dated: September 24, 2024.

Aaron T. Siegel,

Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.

[FR Doc. 2024-22347 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
EX-10.4



 Exhibit 10.4 

THIRD AMENDMENT 
 TO THE

 FIFTH THIRD BANCORP NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN 

(January 1, 2013 Restatement) 

WHEREAS, Fifth Third Bancorp (“Fifth Third”) sponsors and maintains The Fifth Third Bancorp Nonqualified
Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2013 (“Plan”); 
 WHEREAS,
Fifth Third desires to amend the Plan to (i) revise the provisions related to limitations on the amount of annual compensation that may be deferred to the Plan; (ii) add a statute of limitations period for benefit claims; and
(iii) make other changes; 
 WHEREAS, pursuant to Plan section 15.1, Fifth Third reserved the right to amend the
Plan at any time, and delegated authority to the Fifth Third Bank Pension, 401(k) and Medical Plans Committee and its Chairman to amend the Plan. 

NOW, THEREFORE, effective as of the execution date of this Third Amendment, the Plan is hereby amended in the following
respects: 
 1.    Section 2.4 of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

“2.4    ‘Committee’ shall mean The Fifth Third Bank Pension,
401(k), and Medical Plan Committee which is responsible for the administration of this Plan in accordance with the provision of the Plan as set forth in this document. Where applicable, a reference to the Committee includes its delegate.” 

2.    Section 4.1(a) of the Plan is amended in its entirety to read as follows: 

 

	 	“(a)	 Compensation Deferral.    Each Key Employee and Qualified Executive eligible under
Article III may elect to have a portion of his Compensation for services performed during a Plan Year deferred and credited with earnings in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Plan. Pursuant to administrative procedures established by
the Committee, a Key Employee or a Qualified Executive may make separate deferral elections with respect to the base pay and variable compensation portions of his Compensation. The Committee may, in its discretion, establish limits on the amount of
base pay and/or variable compensation that a Key Employee or a Qualified Executive may defer to the Plan for any Plan Year.” 
	 

 3.    Section 16.3 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at
the end: 
 “No such lawsuit may commence later than one year from the date of decision on review by
the Claims Review Committee.” 

  
 1 








 4.    Except as otherwise amended herein, the Plan shall continue in full
force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Fifth Third has caused this amendment to be executed by its duly authorized
representative this 26th day of October, 2017. 
  

			
	FIFTH THIRD BANCORP
		
	By:    	 	 /s/ Robert P. Shaffer

		 	Chairperson for the Fifth Third Bank Pension, 401(k) and Medical Plans Committee



  
 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-7784

HOMER W. WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOHN J. LAMANNA, Warden; RODNEY TABRON, Unit

Manager, in their individual capacity and

personally,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Federal

Bureau of Prisons,

Defendant.

No. 96-7933

HOMER W. WALKER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RODNEY TABRON; JOHN J. LAMANNA; CHARLES

MASSEY, in their individual capacity and

personally,

Defendants - Appellees.
2
3

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Malcolm J.

Howard, District Judges. (CA-95-940-5-BR, CA-96-488-5-H(1))

Submitted: March 27, 1997 Decided: April 4, 1997

Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Homer W. Walker, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Dickerson Kocher,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
4

PER CURIAM:

In No. 96-7933, Walker appeals the district court's order denying relief on his action filed under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named

Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Walker v. Tabron, No. CA-96-488-5-H(1) (E.D.N.C.

Dec. 4, 1996). In No. 96-7784, Walker appeals from the denial of

relief on his Bivens claim alleging that the denial of his furlough

request violated his right to equal protection. Our review of the

record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3231 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                H. R. 3231

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 12, 2016

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect unpaid interns in the 
 Federal Government from workplace harassment and discrimination, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Federal Intern Protection Act of 
2016''.

SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES.

    (a) In General.--Section 2302 of title 5, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g)(1) All protections afforded to an employee under 
subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D) of subsection (b)(1) shall be afforded, 
in the same manner and to the same extent, to an intern and an 
applicant for internship.
    ``(2) For purposes of the application of this subsection, a 
reference to an employee shall be considered a reference to an intern 
in--
            ``(A) section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 
        U.S.C. 2000e-16);
            ``(B) sections 12 and 15 of the Age Discrimination in 
        Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 631, 633a); and
            ``(C) section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 
        U.S.C. 791).
    ``(3) In this subsection, the term `intern' means an individual who 
performs uncompensated voluntary service in an agency to earn credit 
awarded by an educational institution or to learn a trade or 
occupation.''.
    (b) Conforming Amendment.--Section 3111(c)(1) of title 5, United 
States Code, is amended by inserting ``section 2302(g) (relating to 
prohibited personnel practices),'' before ``chapter 81''.

            Passed the House of Representatives January 11, 2016.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Ogulei, David Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 12:27 PM To: Ogulei, David Cc: Woolums, Jane Subject: Phone Call Record 3/24/14



### Call Record

Caller: David Ogulei Date of call: 3/24/14 Time of call: 11:13 am

Purpose of Call: To obtain updated information on the com mercial availability of the multi-metals CEMS.

Call with: John Cooper Phone no. (503) 670-8127 Company: Cooper Environmental Services, Portland, Oregon

EPA is looking into requiring a facility to install three MM CEMS units, one on each incinerator, for a period of at least one year. I am interested in obtaining updat es to the information that Krag Petterson of Cooper Environmental Services previously provided by email to David Ogulei on 7/17/13 at 5:32 PM.

1) Have there been any updates on the commercial avail ability of the multi-metals CEMS?

• Yes, Cooper has expanded substantially. Received o utside funding. Cooper has grown by 3 times since early last

year.

• Currently building stack units for companies around the world.

• Shipping one stack unit next month to a Texas compa ny (Chevron?). The TX company will ship/install th e unit at their facility in Nigeria.

• Also doing a special project for SCAQMD (secondary lead smelter) involving one stack unit and one ambi ent air unit. Will share contact information for the SCAQM D project.

• Currently have a strong presence in China (working on mercury).



### 2) Can Cooper supply three units within a reasonable t imeframe? Within what timeframe can you install, te st and begin operating all three units?

Yes. This is a project management issue. Buildin g the units would not be a problem. 9 months shoul d be adequate to install and begin operating the three units. 12 mo nths should definitely not be a problem. Variables include the types of stack modifications and other site-specific facilit y modifications needed to accommodate the CEMS.



### 3) What would be the approximate cost of installing an d testing the three units? How much would it be for one unit? Do you have a sample invoice you can sha re with us? If you assert confidentialty, your sub mittal may be treated as confidential business information (CBI).

Each unit’s purchase cost is about $250k. Approx. $900k ballpark total for 3 units including installa tion and testing but can’t say for sure. Would need to visit the facili ty and do an appraisal of what is needed. Cooper w ill look into possibly sharing a copy of a recent invoice for Chevron Nige ria (a $350k project) but they would hide the name of the company.

###