alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### BROWN v. MURRAY.

No. 2946.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Jan. 11, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 25, 1934.

*463H. D. Payne, of E’loydada, for appellant

John W. Pope, Lynn B. Milam, and Pat Howe, all of Dallas, for appellee.

PELPHREY, Chief Justice.

On April 23, 1932, appellee was appointed receiver of the North Texas Trust Company, Inc. A part of the estate of said North Texas Trust Company, Inc., was two special assessment certificates issued by the governing body of the city of Floydada, Tex. These certificates were evidences of assessments against appellant for paving improvements abutting property owned by him. On' January 10, 1933, appellee filed suit against appellant in the Ninety-Fifth district court of Dallas county, Tex., alleging the two certificates to be a part of the estate of the North Texas Trust Company, Inc.; that a balance was due thereon; that said balance was secured by statutory assessment lien on the property; and prayed for judgment for the balance due, for foreclosure of the lien, for attorney’s fees, and general relief.

On February 7th appellant filed his statutory plea of privilege. Thereafter, appel-lee filed what purports to be a controverting affidavit in which he alleged the certificates to be a part of the assets of the North Texas Trust Company, Inc., of which he was receiver ; that the property was in his possession as an officer of the court; that the court, having obtained possession of said certificates by virtue of the receivership suit, had exclusive jurisdiction, and therefore it was proper that the venue be maintained in Dallas county.

A hearing was held on the plea of privilege, and it was overruled. From that order this appeal has been perfected.

Appellant presents four assignments of error, but in accordance with the view we take of the matter there is really a single question which must be decided. That is, whether the fact that a court, acting through a re: ceiver ¡has taken possession of property, gives that court exclusive jurisdiction of actions affecting that property rendering the venue statutes inoperative.

In a recent case Chief Justice Jones of the Dallas Court of Civil Appeals had this to say relative to the venue of actions instituted by a receiver: “Suits by parties who are strangers to a receivership against the receiver, or suits by a receiver against strangers to the receivership, are governed by the venue law of this state, without regard to the fact that one of the parties is a duly qualified and acting receiver.’’ Nelson v. Thompson (Tex. Civ. App.) 64 S.W.(2d) 373, 375. We feel that that holding, which appears to be supported by tbe authorities cited, is decisive of the question here.

There being no allegation or proof that this case falls within any exception to the venue statute, appellant was entitled to have it tried in the county of his domicile.

The judgment overruling the plea of privilege is reversed, and the cause ordered transferred to the district court of Floyd county, Tex., for trial.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of GT Solar International, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the
three months ended July 3, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), each of the undersigned of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:

Date:
August 6, 2010

/s/ THOMAS GUTIERREZ Thomas Gutierrez President and Chief Executive OfficerDate: August 6, 2010/s/ RICHARD J. GAYNOR Richard J. Gaynor Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


---



QuickLinks
H. R. 3082 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5919 Chef 

Menteur Highway in New Orleans, Louisiana, as the ‘‘Daryle Holloway Post 

Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. DARYLE HOLLOWAY POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 5919 Chef Menteur Highway in New Orleans, 

Louisiana, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Daryle Holloway 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Daryle Holloway Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Periodic Financial Report  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DJO Finance LLC (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 27, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Leslie H. Cross, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|                                                            |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: November 7, 2008                                      |  | 
|                                                            |  | 
|/s/ LESLIE H. CROSS Leslie H. Cross
Chief Executive Officer |  | 

---



QuickLinks
#### ALLRIDGE v. STATE.

No. 20994.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 10, 1940.

Henry Taylor, of Temple, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of $50 and confinement in jail for 15 days.

The offense of driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated is a felony. Hence it was necessary to sentence the appellant in order to confer jurisdiction upon this court. No sentence appears in the transcript. Under the circumstances, the appeal must be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges’ of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 31.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                      SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

I, Matt Wayrynen, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Elko Ventures
     Inc..;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all
     material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
     flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this
     quarterly report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly
          report is being prepared;
     b.   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and
     c.   presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
          evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and
     b.   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were
     significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could
     significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most
     recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to
     significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the
10th day of October, 2007.


/s/ Matt Wayrynen
---------------------------
Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Derold
L. Kelley, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    August 24, 2007
                                              /s/ Derold L. Kelley
                                              --------------------
                                              Derold L. Kelley
                                              Secretary/Treasurer and Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                   BD
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PIPER JAFFRAY COMPANIES INC. AS OF
AND FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>               12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   SEP-30-1997
<PERIOD-END>                        SEP-30-1997
<CASH>                                    30,862
<RECEIVABLES>                            709,488
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                       34,113
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                          0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                      196,650
<PP&E>                                    32,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         1,131,869
<SHORT-TERM>                             210,805
<PAYABLES>                               446,675
<REPOS-SOLD>                              14,810
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                            0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                        49,370
<LONG-TERM>                               40,709
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                  18,754
<OTHER-SE>                               152,809
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           1,131,869
<TRADING-REVENUE>                        162,340
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                      53,107
<COMMISSIONS>                            218,139
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>             98,335
<FEE-REVENUE>                             37,517
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        26,964
<COMPENSATION>                           372,703
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            1,514
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 1,514
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                 954
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.05
        

</TABLE>
Civil Service

Retirement

System

Federal Employees’

Group Life

Insurance Program

Federal Employees

Health Benefits

Program

Federal Employees

Retirement

System

Long Term

Care Insurance

Program

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 01-111 Date: August 28, 2001

Subject: President Signs Federal Firefighters Retirement Age Fairness Act

Public Law 107-27

On August 20, 2001, the President signed the Federal Firefighters Retirement Age Fairness Act

(Public Law 107-27). This law increases the mandatory separation age of firefighters under

CSRS and FERS to age 57. Prior to the enactment of the Federal Firefighters Retirement Age

Fairness Act, firefighters were subject to mandatory separation at age 55.

The Federal Firefighters Retirement Age Fairness Act was effective on the date of signing. Any

notice of mandatory separation of a firefighter with the date of separation on or after August 20,

2001, is ineffective and the employee may continue to work in his or her firefighting position.

Any mandatory separation at age 55 after the enactment of Federal Firefighters Retirement Age

Fairness Act will be an erroneous separation subject to cancellation. Alternatively, the employee

may elect to accept voluntary retirement under the CSRS or FERS firefighter retirement

provisions.

Mary Ellen Wilson, Director

Retirement Policy Center

Retirement and Insurance Service
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                    DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                                3,245
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        12,137
<ALLOWANCES>                                              0
<INVENTORY>                                           8,893
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     25,648
<PP&E>                                                4,193
<DEPRECIATION>                                            0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       43,448
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                19,513
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                               0
<COMMON>                                                 96
<OTHER-SE>                                           (1,483)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         43,448
<SALES>                                              38,936
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     38,936
<CGS>                                                28,952
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        19,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                          0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                    3,571
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     (12,874)
<INCOME-TAX>                                            873
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 (13,686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                        (13,686)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (1.44)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (1.44)



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                          14,631
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    5,263
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (2,444)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                20,440
<PP&E>                                           5,163
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (2,523)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,602
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,271
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            22
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,358
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,602
<SALES>                                          9,819
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,819
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,820
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                (20)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (5,981)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         2
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,983)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (6,938)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.33)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
| (logo) WELLS  FARGO | **Commercial  Mortgage Servicing**D1050-084,  8th Floor  401 South Tryon St.  Charlotte, NC 28202  1-800-326-1334

 

  |
|---------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 

**ANNUAL STATEMENT OFCOMPLIANCE**

** **

** **

Reference is herebymade to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement dated as of June 1, 2012,by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Corp., asDepositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer andCertificate Administrator, Midland Loan Services, a division of PNC Bank ,National Association, as Special Servicer, Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc.,as Senior Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, withrespect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates JPMC 2012-CIBX (the"Agreement"). Capitalized terms used herein not otherwise definedshall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

 

Pursuant to Section11.09 of this Agreement, I, Leslie Hayton, Managing Director of CommercialMortgage Services do hereby certify that:

 

1.           A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period fromJanuary 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018 (the “Reporting Period”), and of itsperformance per the Agreement during such period has been made under mysupervision, and

 

2.           To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer hasfulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respectsthroughout the Reporting Period.

 

 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 28th day ofFebruary 2019.

 

 

/s/ Leslie Hayton

Leslie Hayton

Managing Director 

Wells Fargo Bank

 

 

| Wells Fargo Bank,  N.A. | (logo) Together  we’ll go far |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------|
##### 



CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  /s/ JEAN-PIERRE VANDROMME
 
 118
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Clopton House Corporation,  (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Meuse, President and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joseph Meuse

---------------------------

Joseph Meuse

President and Chief Executive Officer

October 3, 2008
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3254 

To amend the Dale Long Public Safety Officers’ Benefits Improvements 

Act of 2012 to change the retroactive application of the Act to cover 

injuries sustained by rescue squad or ambulance crew members on or 

after December 1, 2007, rather than June 1, 2009. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. MARINO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Dale Long Public Safety Officers’ Benefits 

Improvements Act of 2012 to change the retroactive 

application of the Act to cover injuries sustained by 

rescue squad or ambulance crew members on or after 

December 1, 2007, rather than June 1, 2009. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Kline DeWire Public 

5 Safety Officers’ Retroactive Benefits Act’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3254 IH

1 SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR DALE LONG 

2 PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICERS’ BENEFITS IM3 PROVEMENTS ACT OF 2012. 

4 Subsection (d)(2)(A) of the Dale Long Public Safety 

5 Officers’ Benefits Improvements Act of 2012 (section 

6 1086 of Public Law 112–239; 126 Stat. 1969; 42 U.S.C. 

7 3791 note) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking ‘‘this Act’’ and inserting ‘‘this 

9 section’’; and 

10 (2) by striking ‘‘June 1, 2009’’ and inserting 

11 ‘‘December 1, 2007’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS