alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal C 43/4 Fe

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 43 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 594 February 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 43

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 594 February 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 043/1 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — first supplement to the 34th complete edition | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 043/1

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species — first supplement to the 34th complete edition

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Karen Kristine Silvio v. Jo-Lynn Boggan, Adminitratix of the 

Estate of Sybil Christine Silvio

Appellate case number: 01-16-00258-CV

Trial court case number: 2016-15418

Trial court: 129th District Court of Harris County

On March 8, 2016, appellant, Karen Kristine Silvio, filed an emergency motion to 

stay pending appeal of eviction. The Court grants the stay of the eviction. The Court 

requests that the appellee, Jo-Lynn Boggan, Adminitratix of the Estate of Sybil Christine 

Silvio, respond to the emergency motion by no later than ten days from the date of this 

order. It is therefore ordered that the response of the appellee, if any, shall be due by 

Monday, April 18, 2016.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 8, 2016
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

 DCN: SE02129A1

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Charles M. Stivers, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky
USA Energy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Kentucky USA Energy, Inc..





Date:  June
      21, 2010
                By:
                /s/
      Charles M. StiversCharles
      M. StiversChief
      Financial Officer





A signed
original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
Kentucky USA Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Kentucky USA Energy, Inc.,
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
| (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of the operations of the Company. |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: November 23, 2010 | /s/ David Bychkov                |
|-------------------------|----------------------------------|
|                    | David Bychkov                    |
|                    | President, Chief Financial       |
|                    | Officer, Chief Executive Officer |
|                    | (Principal financial officer)    |
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on July 10, 2024, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Senior Healthcare Innovation Consortium (“SHIC”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Prudent Homecare, Bismarck, ND, and UnaliWear, Austin, TX, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and SHIC intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On November 02, 2022, SHIC filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on November 23, 2022 (87 FR 71677).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 4, 2024. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 52094).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2024-22090 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-23-00553-CR

Geraro Mendiola Jr.

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

227th District Court of Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2023CR6869

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 23, 2024
# CE2004088EN.01060602.xml

| 8.4.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 88/606 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 88/606

---

(2004/C 88 E/0626)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-0989/03

by Roberta Angelilli (UEN) to the Commission

(27 March 2003)

Subject:   Use of funds from the Culture 2000 programme by the municipality of Siena

Subject:

In September 2002, the monitoring committee of the Italian Ministry for Economic Affairs issued a report on the spending of EU funds.

The report reveals the alarming slowness and inefficiency with which EU funds are allocated to projects by some regional authorities.

The grave concerns about the inadequate use of European funds by local authorities have frequently been echoed by the Commission.

Bearing in mind that some local authorities, such as the municipality of Siena, urgently need to use European funds to enhance the common cultural area in all its diversity and respecting all its traditions, nurturing creativity and professional mobility, and promoting access to and dissemination of art and culture,

can the Commission state:

| 1. | whether the municipality of Siena has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme? |
| --- | --- |

1.

whether the municipality of Siena has submitted projects for the Culture 2000 programme?

| 2. | whether the municipality of Siena has secured funding for these projects? |
| --- | --- |

2.

whether the municipality of Siena has secured funding for these projects?

| 3. | whether this funding has been used? |
| --- | --- |

3.

whether this funding has been used?

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80280]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22641]



[[Page 80280]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 19, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Contract 355 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-713, K2024-6.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22641 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
NAICS_IEc 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 

321 16 11 11 3 3 4 7 3 6 2 2 2 3 4 5 5 2 1 1 1 324 4 1 2 6 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 325 3 57 19 16 1 1 5 29 5 2 1 7 4 1 2 4 2 3 3 4 2 1 2 3 331 1 332 14 7 7 5 4 7 22 2 1 1 1 1 2 4 3 4 1 334 9 1 14 1 7 20 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 562 184 52 53 17 21 19 65 10 3 2 3 2 1 1 1 3 5 5 4 4 4 1 812 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 2 1 AG 1 1 11 

AT 1 

BS 1 CG 3 1 4 1 1 1 1 1 CO 1 1 CP 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 

CS 1 1 2 1 2 1 DC 2 1 FT 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 GP 25 11 16 4 2 7 1 3 3 1 2 2 6 3 6 5 1 5 4 ID 19 4 6 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 MD 2 1 1 3 1 2 ME 9 5 2 1 4 5 4 2 5 1 NM 3 1 1 1 11 None OP 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 OT 13 6 12 2 3 1 14 1 3 3 1 3 1 1 2 PM 8 2 2 2 1 4 2 2 3 2 4 1 1 1 3 5 1 2 1 1 1 PR 3 2 2 4 1 1 

PS 6 1 6 1 1 2 1 1 RA 1 3 5 1 2 1 1 1 1 RC 1 1 3 1 RD 1 2 1 1 REC 1 42 11 14 6 1 6 19 4 1 2 4 4 3 1 5 3 5 3 RW 2 2 SE 3 1 1 1 1 TA 1 2 1 2 2 TP 1 1 2 6 1 2 1 1 1 TS 2 2 1 1 2 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 TW 1 1 UK 2 1 1 Grand Tota 5 440 137 182 51 40 56 235 36 19 31 25 21 20 15 14 32 45 50 35 10 17 31 15
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Long Term 

Care Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-212 Date: December 10, 2002 

 Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Termination of 

Provider Contracts for Keystone Health Plan East (KHPE), Code ED

We received notification from Keystone Health Plan East (KHPE), enrollment code (ED), that 

they will cancel their provider contracts in New Jersey effective July 1, 2003. The affected 

counties in New Jersey are as follows: Atlantic, Bergen, Essex, Cumberland, Cape May, Hudson, 

Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Somerset, Union. 

 

As a result, effective July 1, 2003, KHPE members will no longer have access to providers in the 

above counties except for emergency care, and for services such as previously scheduled 

procedures, 2nd and 3rd trimester pregnancies, and other continuity of care situations. 

 

We are advising you to alert employees so that they may choose another health plan. You may 

accept changes until January 10, 2003. The effective date of these changes should be the same as 

the open season changes, the first pay period on or after January 1, 2003. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 

 Abby L. Block 

 Assistant Director 

 for Insurance Programs
SCWC

- 14

- 0000 987

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI ʻ I

________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAI  I,

Respondent/ Plaintiff

- Appellee,

vs.

DAVID T. FLEMING,

Petitioner/Defendant

- Appellant,

________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

(CAAP

- 14

- 0000987 ; CASE NO. 2PC061000570 )

ORDER GR ANTING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERA TION IN PART

(By: Recktenwald, C .J., Nakayama, McKenna, Wilson, and Eddins, JJ.)

Upon consideration of Petitioner’s motion for

reconsideration filed on April 20, 2021 and the record herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is granted in part

.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that on the last paragraph of

page 7 of the Summary Disposition Order the phrase, “if he is

determined to be fit to proceed to trial” shall be deleted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the last para graph on page 9

shall be corrected to read :

For the reasons set forth herein, the ICA’s September 6,

2017 J udgment on A ppeal, the circuit court’s July 18, 2014

J udgment of C onviction and S entence, and the circuit

court’s March 16, 2011 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-14-0000987

29-APR-2021

02:38 PM

Dkt. 42 OGDMR2 and Order Denying De fendant’s Motion for New Trial are

vacated and the case is remanded to the circuit court for

further proceedings consistent with this S ummary

D isposition O rder

.

The motion for reconsideration is denied in all other

respects.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai ‘ i

, April 29, 2021.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

/s/ Todd W. Eddins
#### EVANS v. STATE.

No. 16811.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 30, 1934.

Rehearing Denied June 27, 1934.

Jones & Jones, of Mineóla, for appellant.

Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The appellant was convicted of the offense of unlawfully manufacturing spirituous, vinous, and malt liquor capable of producing intoxication, and his punishment assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years and six months.

By bills of exception 1 and 2 the appellant assails the validity of the indictment upon which he was tried and convicted, in that the indictment failed to charge that the alleged spirituous, vinous, and malt liquor contained more than 3.2 per cent, alcohol by weight. This question was before this court in the case of W. I. Butts v. State, 73 S.W. (2d) 96, decided May 23, 1934, in which this court, speaking through Judge Hawkins, said:

“It seems to be appellant’s contention that since the passage of the act mentioned under the constitutional amendment referred to an indictment is insufficient unless in addition to charging that accused possessed for the purpose of sale intoxicating liquor, the indictment go further and describe the liquor as ‘spirituous,’ or if it is vinous or malt liquor, designate it as such, and then follow the designation by an averment that it contained more than 3.2 per cent, alcohol by weight. We are not able to bring ourselves to agree with such contention.

“In our opinion the present indictment charges an offense.”

Under the authority of Butts v. State, supra, the appellant’s contention is overruled, and the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.

*538PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
​

**Exhibit 21.1**

​

**SUBSIDIARIES OF WHITEHORSE FINANCE, INC.**

​

| ​                               | ​                      | ​          |
|---------------------------------------|------------------------------|------------------|
| **Name**                              | **    ** | **Jurisdiction** |
| WhiteHorse Finance Credit I, LLC      | ​                      | Delaware         |
| WhiteHorse Finance (CA), LLC          | ​                      | Delaware         |
| WHF PMA Holdco Blocker, LLC           | ​                      | Delaware         |
| WhiteHorse RCKC Holdings, LLC         | ​                      | Delaware         |
| WhiteHorse Finance Holdings, LLC | ​                      | Delaware         |

​

----
# Official Journal C 248/2008

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 248 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5130 September 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 248

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5130 September 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 248/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5266 — Bertelsmann/3i/Buy Vip) (1) | 1 |
| 2008/C 248/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5276 — Diehl/Thales/Laupheim) (1) | 1 |
| 2008/C 248/03 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5221 — Kenwood/JVC/Holdco) (1) | 2 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 248/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5266 — Bertelsmann/3i/Buy Vip) (1)

1

2008/C 248/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5276 — Diehl/Thales/Laupheim) (1)

1

2008/C 248/03

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.5221 — Kenwood/JVC/Holdco) (1)

2

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 248/04 | Euro exchange rates | 3 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2008/C 248/05 | First processing undertakings in the raw tobacco sector approved by the Member States | 4 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS AND BODIES

Commission

2008/C 248/04

Euro exchange rates

3

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2008/C 248/05

First processing undertakings in the raw tobacco sector approved by the Member States

4

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2008/C 248/06 | Call for proposals — ‘Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy’ — Implementation of information measures under budget heading 05 08 06 for 2009 | 8 |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2008/C 248/07 | Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/131-136/08 | 21 |

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2008/C 248/06

Call for proposals — ‘Support for information measures relating to the common agricultural policy’ — Implementation of information measures under budget heading 05 08 06 for 2009

8

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2008/C 248/07

Notice of open competitions EPSO/AD/131-136/08

21

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| 2008/C 248/08 | Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover) | s3 |

2008/C 248/08

Note to the reader(see page 3 of the cover)

Note to the reader

s3

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Order entered December 22, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 15
- 01493
- CV MICHAEL GAY COOK, Appellant

V. CAROLINE D. COOK, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CI15
- 070



### O RDER Before Justices Lang, Fillmore and Brown Before the Court is Appellant’s December 22, 2015 Application for Restraining Order in which appellant requests that the Court prohibit appellee from enforcing the trial court’s writ of possessi on for the property that is the subject of this appeal

. On December 10, 2015, appellant filed a motion in this Court to reduce supersedeas bond contending that the trial court had set the supersedeas bond at $1800, an amount he could not pay and that woul d cause him substantial economic harm. Because the clerk’s record filed in the appeal did not contain an order setting
t he amount of supersedeas bond, on December 14, 2015, we ordered the Rockwall County Clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record contain ing a copy of the order setting supersedeas bond or written verification that such an order could not be located. On December 15, 2015, theRockwall County Clerk responded that the clerk’s office could not locate an order from the trial

court setting a su persedeas bond. By letter dated December 21, 2015, the official court reporter of the Rockwall County Court at Law advised the Court that there was no hearing setting a supersedeas bond in the case and that it was her understanding that no motion has been filed requesting the setting of a supersedeas bond. Appellant also has not included a copy of any order setting the supersedeas bond in support of either his motion to reduce supersedeas bond or his application for temporary restraining order. Under the Texas Property Code, the judgment of the county court granting a writ of possession may not under any circumstances be stayed pending appeal unless, within 10 days of the signing of the trial court’s judgment, the appellant files a supersedeas bond in the amount set by the county court

. T EX
. P ROP
. C ODE A NN
. § 24.007 (West 2014) ; T EX
. R. C IV
. P. 510.13

. The record before the Court does not reflect that appellant has filed a supersedeas bond in the amount determined by the county court. Accordingly, we lac k the authority to grant the relief requested.
We DENY appellant’s application for temporary restraining order.
/s/ ROBERT M. FILLMORE JUSTICE