alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS CONSENT


The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Polaroid Corporation

We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements No.
33-36384 on Form S-8, No. 33-44661 on Form S-3, No. 33-51173 on Form S-8, No.
333-32283 on Form S-8, No. 333-32285 on Form S-8, No. 333-67647 on Form S-3
and No. 333-96051 on Form S-3 of Polaroid Corporation of our reports dated
January 22, 2001, except as to Note 6, Note 15 and Paragraph 6 of Note 14
which are as of March 27, 2001 relating to the consolidated balance sheets of
Polaroid Corporation and subsidiary companies as of December 31, 2000 and
1999, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, cash flows, and
changes in common stockholders equity, and related financial statement
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2000, which reports appear in the December 31, 2000 annual report on Form
10-K of Polaroid Corporation.

                                         /S/ KPMG LLP


Boston, Massachusetts
March 30, 2001
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2023096EN.01000701.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 15.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 96/7 |

---

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case M.11023 – ADP / JCDECAUX / MEDIA AEROPORTS DE PARIS JV)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 96/06)

1.

On 8 March 2023, the Commission received notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2023096EN.01000701-E0001).

This notification concerns the following undertakings:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Aéroports de Paris S.A. (‘ADP’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | JCDecaux S.E. (‘JCDecaux’, France), |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | Media Aéroports de Paris (‘JV’, France). |

ADP and JCDecaux will acquire within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) and 3(4) of the Merger Regulation joint control of JV.

The concentration is accomplished by way of purchase of shares.

2.

The business activities of the undertakings concerned are:

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | ADP: company responsible for the facilities, operation and development of Paris-Charles de Gaulle, Paris-Orly and Paris-Le Bourget airports, as well as some civil airports in the Ile-de-France region and abroad, |

| | |
| --- | --- |
| — | JCDecaux: French group active worldwide in the outdoor advertising sector. |

3.

The business activities of JV are: exploitation and sale of advertising displays at Paris-Charles de Gaulle, Paris-Orly and Paris-Le Bourget airports (in France), Antalya and Bodrum-Milas airports (in Turkey), and Amman’s Queen Alia airport (in Jordan).

4.

On preliminary examination, the Commission finds that the notified transaction could fall within the scope of the Merger Regulation. However, the final decision on this point is reserved.

Pursuant to the Commission Notice on a simplified procedure for treatment of certain concentrations under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 [(2)](#ntr2-C_2023096EN.01000701-E0002), it should be noted that this case is a candidate for treatment under the procedure set out in the Notice.

5.

The Commission invites interested third parties to submit their possible observations on the proposed operation to the Commission.

Observations must reach the Commission no later than ten days following the date on which this notification is published. The following reference should always be specified:

M.11023 – ADP / JCDECAUX / MEDIA AEROPORTS DE PARIS JV

Observations can be sent to the Commission by email or by post. Please use the contact details below:

Email: COMP-MERGER-REGISTRY@ec.europa.eu

Postal address:

| |
| --- |
| European Commission |
| Directorate-General for Competition |
| Merger Registry |
| 1049 Bruxelles/Brussel |
| BELGIQUE/BELGIË |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2023096EN.01000701-E0001)  [OJ L 24 of 29.1.2004, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2004_024_R_TOC) (the ‘Merger Regulation’).

[(2)](#ntc2-C_2023096EN.01000701-E0002)  [OJ C 366 of 14.12.2013, p. 5](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOC_2013_366_R_TOC).

---
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 3, 2022.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14-22-00004-CV

JASWINDER PAL SINGH, Appellant

V.

MARIA HERNANDEZ AND GABRIEL LARA DURAN, Appellees

On Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No. 1

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1145598

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This is an appeal from a judgment signed November 9, 2021. On February 1, 2022, 

appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is 

granted.

We dismiss the appeal.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Jewell, Zimmerer, and Hassan.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 368 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-720, K2024-13.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22658 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL 12, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Paritosh K.
Choksi, Director, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                             
|---------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008                         
|                                             
|/s/ Paritosh K. Choksi                       
|Paritosh K. Choksi                           
|Director, Executive Vice President and Chief 
|Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer
|of ATEL Associates 12, LLC (Managing Member) 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 Certification Pursuant To
18 U.S.C. Section 1350
As Adopted Pursuant To
Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002
     /s/ Ronald D. MogelRonald D. MogelVice President andChief Financial OfficerHorizon Offshore, Inc.
| **Borrowings - Schedule of Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (Details) (USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Dec. 31, 2012 | Dec. 31, 2011 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Debt Disclosure [Abstract]**                                                                                        |          |          |
| Putable advances included in the outstanding balance to Federal Home Loan Bank                                        | $ 0           | $ 48          |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Advances from Federal Home Loan Banks, Putable
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**frme_AdvancesFromFederalHomeLoanBanksPutable**Namespace Prefix:**frme_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                          |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_DebtDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
# Official Journal C 399/28 O

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 399 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5928 October 2016 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 399

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5928 October 2016

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2016/C 399/01 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2016 to 30 September 2016(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) | 1 |
| 2016/C 399/02 | Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2016 to 30 September 2016(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC) | 9 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2016/C 399/01

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2016 to 30 September 2016(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

(Published pursuant to Article 13 or Article 38 of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council)

1

2016/C 399/02

Summary of European Union decisions on marketing authorisations in respect of medicinal products from 1 September 2016 to 30 September 2016(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

(Decisions taken pursuant to Article 34 of Directive 2001/83/EC or Article 38 of Directive 2001/82/EC)

9

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit (23)




                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent   public   accountants,   we  hereby  consent  to  the
 incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into Portland General
 Corporation's previously filed Registration Statement  No. 33-27462 on Form
  S-8,  Registration Statement No. 33-40943  on  Form  S-8,  Registration 
  Statement No. 33-49811 on Form S-8,
 Registration Statement No. 33-55321 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement 
 No. 33-61313 on Form S-3.


                                                            Arthur Andersen LLP


 Portland, Oregon,
 January 24, 1996







                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


 As   independent   public   accountants,  we  hereby  consent  to  the
incorporation of our reports included in this Form 10-K, into Portland General
 Electric Company's previously filed Registration  Statement  No.  33-62549
 on Form S-3.  
 
 

                                                            Arthur Andersen LLP

 Portland, Oregon,
 January 24, 1996


<PAGE>
#### OWENS v. STATE.

No. 20785.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 24, 1940.

Williamson & Nordyke, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., -of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the sale of whisky in dry area. The punishment assessed is a fine of $100.

From the record it clearly appears that Comanche County, by virtue of an election held in 1909, is dry area. On the 22d. day of June, 1939, J. M. Rich went to -appellant’s place of business, located about 100 yards from Comanche County in Erath County and purchased a pint of whisky from him. The evidence shows that appellant was operating a package store just across the line in Erath County, but clearly within 400 yards of Comanche County. Appellant offered no affirmative defense, but requested an instructed verdict on the grounds that the uncontradicted evidence showed that he was guilty of no offense* His request was overruled by the court and he excepted.

The prosecution apparently arose under and by virtue of Art. 190, C.C.P., which provides that where an offense is *998committed on the boundary of • any two counties, or within four hundred yards thereof, an accused may be prosecuted in either county. The law prohibiting the sale of intoxicating liquor is a local law which applies only to those counties which have, as provided by the Constitution and Statutes, availed themselves by an election of the right to local option. Art. 190, C.C. P., is purely a venue statute and does not make an offense of an act which is legalized where committed. We find no proof in the record at all that Erath County was dry territory. The prosecution in the instant case proceeded on the theory that an “offense” had been committed in Erath County. The proof does not bear out this supposition. Consequently the evidence is insufficient. See Talley v. State, 66 Tex.Cr.R. 342, 147 S.W. 255; Hutchins v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 40 S.W. 996; Earl v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 490, 126 S.W.2d 664; Allen v. State, 136 Tex.Cr.R. 462, 126 S.W.2d 485; Sweeten v. State, 135 Tex.Cr.R. 445, 120 S.W.2d 1074; Stewart v. State, 132 Tex.Cr.R. 79, 102 S.W.2d 416; Hudson v. State, 118 Tex.Cr.R. 284, 40 S.W.2d 141.

The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
In the Senate of the United States, 

October 6, 2015. 

Resolved, That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 3116) entitled ‘‘An Act to extend by 15 years the 

authority of the Secretary of Commerce to conduct the quarterly financial report program.’’, do pass with the following 

AMENDMENT: 

At the appropriate place, insert the following: 

1 SEC. 3. REPORT ON DATA SECURITY PROCEDURES OF THE 

2 BUREAU OF THE CENSUS. 

3 (a) REVIEW.—The Secretary of Commerce shall con4 duct a review of the data security procedures of the Bureau 

5 of the Census, including such procedures that have been im6 plemented since the data breaches of systems of the Office 

7 of Personnel Management were announced in 2015. 

8 (b) REPORT.— 

9 (1) REQUIREMENT.—Not later than 90 days 

10 after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Sec11 retary of Commerce shall submit to the Committee on 
2 

† HR 3116 EAS 

1 Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the 

2 Senate and the Committee on Oversight and Govern3 ment Reform of the House of Representatives a report 

4 on the review required by subsection (a). 

5 (2) CONTENTS.—The report required by para6 graph (1) shall— 

7 (A) identify all information systems of the 

8 Bureau of the Census that contain sensitive in9 formation; 

10 (B) described any actions carried out by the 

11 Secretary of Commerce or the Director of the Bu12 reau of the Census to secure sensitive informa13 tion that have been implemented since the data 

14 breaches of systems of the Office of Personnel 

15 Management were announced in 2015; 

16 (C) identify any known data breaches of in17 formation systems of the Bureau of the Census 

18 that contain sensitive information; and 

19 (D) identify whether the Bureau of the Cen20 sus stores any information that, if combined 
3 

† HR 3116 EAS 

1 with other such information, would comprise 

2 classified information. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H.R. 3116 

AMENDMENT
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles P. Theuer, M.D., Ph.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

 

| Date:  February 15, 2017  | /s/ Charles P. Theuer, M.D., Ph.D.    |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------|
|                                     | Charles P. Theuer, M.D., Ph.D.        |
|                                     | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|                                     | (Principal Executive Officer)         |
Exhibit 13.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The undersigned, Bob Little, of Hunt Mining Corp, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The annual report on Form 20-F of Hunt Mining Corp for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Hunt Mining Corp.
 
  Date:  April 30, 2015
 
 /s/ Bob Little
 Bob Little
 Chief Financial Officer
 (Principal Financial Officer and
 Principal Accounting Officer)
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hunt Mining Corp and will be retained by Hunt Mining Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Official Journal L 28/1 Fe

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 28 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 491 February 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 28

English edition

Legislation

Volume 491 February 2006

---

| Contents | | II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | Commission |
| | * | Commission Recommendation of 15 December 2005 on guidelines for the application of Regulation (Euratom) No 302/2005 on the application of Euratom safeguards
  (notified under document number C(2005) 5127) | 1 |

Contents

II   Acts whose publication is not obligatory

page

Commission

*

Commission Recommendation of 15 December 2005 on guidelines for the application of Regulation (Euratom) No 302/2005 on the application of Euratom safeguards
  (notified under document number C(2005) 5127)

(notified under document number C(2005) 5127)

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### Ex parte VINSON et al.

No. 19098.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 12, 1937.

Percy Foreman, of Houston, for appellants.

Lloyd W. Davidson,-State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*253KRUEGER, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the Honorable Langston G. King, judge of the Criminal District Court No. 2 of Harris County, Tex., fixing the amount of bail for each of the appellants in the sum of $5,000. This is the second appeal by the appellant Sherwood Vinson. The former appeal was from an order denying him bail. Upon his appeal we reversed the judgment of the court below and fixed the amount of his bond in the sum of $5,000. In the meantime, the court had granted bail to Blackshear and Phifer in the sum of $10,000 each. Theseafter all three of the appellants by an application for a writ of habeas corpus sought to have the amount of bail reduced. The court reduced the bond of Blackshear and Phifer to the sum of $5,000 each. No testimony was offered by either of the appellants that they were unable to give bond in said sum or that they had made any effort to do so. In the absence of such showing, we would not be justified in disturbing the judgment of the court below.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the lower court be and the same is in all things affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.