alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### AMERICAN FIDELITY & CASUALTY CO. v. NEWMAN.

No. 7833.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

June 1, 1935.

Wheeler & Fraser and A. E. Wood, all of Austin, John H. Awtry, of Dallas, and Dan Moody, of Austin, for appellant.

Tom Gambrell and Fred Blundell, both of Lockhart, and Hart, Patterson & Hart, of Austin, for appellee.

BAUGH, Justice.

At a former term of this court, we affirmed the judgment of the district court of Caldwell county overruling the plea of privilege of the American Fidelity & Casualty Company to be sued in the district court of Dallas county [60 S.W.(2d) 482]. Subsequent thereto the appellant applied to the Supreme Court for writ of mandamus to require this court to certify to the Supreme Court the questions of law involved. See American Fid. & Cas. Co. v. McClendon, C. J., et al. (Tex. Com. App.) 81 S.W. (2d) 493. On April 3, 1935, the Supreme Court, in Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines, 81 S.W. (2d) 482, which case involved the same question as that involved in this case, determined that the insurance company was not a proper or necessary party to the suit filed by the plaintiff against the motor carrier. In the opinion rendered on appellant’s application for a writ of mandamus, the Supreme Court ordered the writ to issue, but made the following holding: “Should, however, the Honorable Court of Civil Appeals, in .view of the decision this day made in the case of Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines [(Tex. Com. App.) 81 S.W. (2d) *482],*set aside its previous judgment and enter judgment in accordance with our decision in that case [Cannon Ball Motor Freight Lines v. Grasso, 81 S.W. (2d) 482], it will not be necessary for it to certify the question to this court.”

In accordance, therefore, with the holding of the Supreme Court in the Grasso Case, and the suggestion made as above quoted, our former judgment affirming the judgment of the trial court is set aside, and in lieu thereof the following judgment is entered: The judgment of the trial court is reversed, with instructions to the trial court to transfer the case, in so far as the defendant American Fidelity & Casualty Company is concerned, to the district court of Dallas county, in accordance with the plea of privilege filed by it.

*711The clerk of this court is directed to transmit to the clerk of the Supreme Court certified copy of this judgment showing compliance by this court with the suggestion made in the opinion of the Supreme Court upon said application for the writ of mandamus.

Former judgment set aside; judgment of trial court reversed, with instructions.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 21

- 00212

- CV
Raymond Trent Peterek v. Melissa Jean Allison
On Appeal from the County Court at Law of Aransas County , Texas Trial Court Cause No. A

- 15

- 7029

- FL

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having consid ered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. No costs are assessed, due to appellant ’ s inability to pay cos ts.
We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Se ptember 23 , 2021
#### TIPTON v. STATE.

No. 18475.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

Jones & Kirkham and D. S. Purl, all of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty.-, of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for burglary; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. All matters of procedure appearing regular, the judgment will be affirmed.
Exhibit 99.7





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Sears Canada Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 40-F for the 53-week period ended February 2, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, E.J. Bird, Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:


|   |                                                                                                                      
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

|   |                                                                                                                                                     
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




By:/s/ E.J. BirdE.J. BirdInterim Chief Financial Officer





March 15, 2013
EXHIBIT
      32.1








CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each
      of
      the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of RINO
      International Corporation (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that
      to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
            The
                Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
                March
                31, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
                15(d) of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.






Dated:
      August 14, 2008




/s/
      Zou Dejun__________________


Zou
      Dejun


Chief
      Executive Officer




/s/
      Bruce Richardson__________________


Bruce
      Richardson


Chief
      Financial Officer






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      RINO International Corporation and will be retained by RINO International
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
#### Apollo Stationery Co., Inc., Plaintiff, *v.*Frank Pilmar et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

April 1, 1958.

*264*Irving Abramson*and *Everett E. Lewis*for plaintiff.

*S. Sidney Smith, Norman A. Haft*and *Jack Lindner*for defendants.

Mobbis E. Spegtob, J.

Motion *for*a temporary injunction is denied and the stay vacated. Plaintiff seeks to enjoin a former employee and others from soliciting its customers or doing any business with them, alleging that defendant Pilmer has obtained a listing of its customers in an improper manner and for the purpose of competing with it.

Plaintiff’s citations are clearly distinguishable from the present case, for example; In *Conviser*v. *Brownstone & Co.*(209 App. Div. 584) the defendant used a list of plaintiff’s customers dishonestly obtained by defendant from one of plaintiff’s employees ; in *Duane Jones Co.*v. *Burke*(306 N. Y. 172) there was clearly a conspiracy to steal plaintiff’s customers originating at a time when certain of the defendants were officers of the plaintiff corporation and owed it a fiduciary duty.

The Court of Appeals pointed out in *Town & Country Service*v. *Newbery*(3 N Y 2d 554, 557) that the *Duane Jones*case involved unusual facts. Likewise the *Town & Country*case involved unusual facts. A customers’ list had been formulated by plaintiff therein by the making of 200 to 300 telephone calls to the public in general to obtain every 8 to 12 customers (p. 560), which customers were not at advertised locations (p. 558) and in the *Town & Country*case the plaintiff’s customers were the *only*persons solicited by defendants (p. 560). There is a clear distinction between cases where a former employee solicits customers of his former employer who are openly engaged in business in advertised locations and his soliciting unadvertised customers who became known to the employee only because of information obtained during his employment *(Town & Country Service*v. *Newbery,*3 N Y 2d 554, 558, *supra).*

There is a sharp question of fact presented by the affidavits as to the source of defendant Pilmar’s listing of persons to *265whom he sent announcements or whom he solicited directly, and, therefore, a temporary injunction will not be granted *(Geed*v. *Braunsdorf,*277 App. Div. 1001). Plaintiff may settle an order providing for an early trial.
# Official Journal L 248/2014

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 248 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5722 August 2014 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 248

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5722 August 2014

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 913/2014 of 21 August 2014 laying down temporary exceptional support measures for producers of peaches and nectarines | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 914/2014 of 21 August 2014 amending for the 217th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network | 7 |
| | | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 915/2014 of 21 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 10 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | | 2014/536/EU |
| | * | Commission Decision of 14 August 2014 granting the Hellenic Republic a derogation from certain provisions of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council | 12 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 913/2014 of 21 August 2014 laying down temporary exceptional support measures for producers of peaches and nectarines

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 914/2014 of 21 August 2014 amending for the 217th time Council Regulation (EC) No 881/2002 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities associated with the Al Qaida network

7

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 915/2014 of 21 August 2014 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

10

DECISIONS

2014/536/EU

*

Commission Decision of 14 August 2014 granting the Hellenic Republic a derogation from certain provisions of Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council

12

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF TRUSTEE OF TREASURE ISLAND ROYALTY TRUST
             PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying report of Treasure Island Royalty Trust (the
"Trust") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, not in its individual capacity but solely as the trustee of the
Trust, certifies that to its knowledge:

     (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Trust.

                                        U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,
                                        Trustee for Treasure Island Royalty
                                        Trust


Date: May 10, 2007                      By: /s/ STEVEN A. FINKLEA
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Steven A. Finklea
                                            Vice President
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

Luis Rivera a/k/a Luis Rivera Cintron

, * From the 35 th District Court

of Brown County

Trial Court No. CR26135

.

Vs. No. 11

- 1 9

- 00 0 4 9

- CR * December 5 , 2019

The Sta te of Texas, * Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

(Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J.

, Stretcher, J., and Wright, S.C.J.,

sitting by assignment)

(Willson, J., not participating)

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there

is no error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court’s

opinion, the judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE RESTATED FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION
EXTRACTED FROM THE UNAUDITED INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR BILLING CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF AND FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 1997 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER>   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          77,002
<SECURITIES>                                         4
<RECEIVABLES>                                   26,558
<ALLOWANCES>                                       183
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               197,420
<PP&E>                                          27,000 
<DEPRECIATION>                                   7,595
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 224,068
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          159,036
<BONDS>                                          2,621
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           334
<OTHER-SE>                                      59,443
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   224,068
<SALES>                                          2,368
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                40,861
<CGS>                                            1,793
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   24,926
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    45
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 102
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,398
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,393 
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,005 
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,005  
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.20 
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.19 
        

</TABLE>
----

**Exhibit 31.2**

**Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

I, Hongsheng Wang, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China DashengBiotechnology Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2009; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small businessissuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small businessissuer and have: 

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s secondfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrols over financial reporting. 

Date: February 6, 2009 

/s/ Hongsheng Wang                                             Hongsheng Wang, Chief Financial Officer ** **
SECOND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND DATE


     WHEREAS, an Agreement (the "Agreement") dated April 26, 1995
between Potomac Electric Power Company (the "Company") and Edward
F. Mitchell ("Mitchell") provides for the continuance of Mitchell's
service as an officer of the Company; and

     WHEREAS, Mitchell and the Company executed an Agreement to
Extend Date on September 22, 1995 wherein the parties agreed,
pursuant to Sections 1, 3 and 4 of the Agreement, to a date
subsequent to the January 1, 1997 date set forth in said Sections
1, 3 and 4; and

     WHEREAS, Mitchell and the Company executed Amendment #1 to
Agreement on October 23, 1997 to provide for the continuation of
Mitchell's employment as Chairman of the Board; and

     WHEREAS, Mitchell and the Company wish to further extend the
date set forth in Sections 1, 3 and 4 of the Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

     1.   Pursuant to the provisions of Sections 1, 3 and 4 of the
Agreement, the Company and Mitchell hereby mutually agree that the
date set forth in Sections 1, 3 and 4 of the Agreement shall be
changed to May 1, 1998.

     2.   Except as amended herein, the provisions of the Agreement
dated April 26, 1995 and Amendment #1 to Agreement dated October
23, 1997 shall remain in full force in effect.

     Agreed effective the 19th day of December, 1997.

Edward F. Mitchell                      Potomac Electric Power
Company



______________________             By:  _______________________
                                           John M. Derrick, Jr.

Attest:


______________________
       Secretary
# Official Journal L 341/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 341 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6424 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 341

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6424 September 2021

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | * | Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/1712 of 23 September 2021 amending Recommendation (EU) 2020/912 on the temporary restriction on non-essential travel into the EU and the possible lifting of such restriction | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

RECOMMENDATIONS

*

Council Recommendation (EU) 2021/1712 of 23 September 2021 amending Recommendation (EU) 2020/912 on the temporary restriction on non-essential travel into the EU and the possible lifting of such restriction

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.