ENTEC $••ces" Pollution Control System Evaluation

and Source Emissions

Testing Cherokee Brick

and

Tile Macon, Georgia Compliance Emissions

Re-Testing No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber

Stack

dUN 2 2008 April 19, 2007 Entec Project

No.: 27147

16-D Commerce

Avenue

Hueytown,

Alabama

35023 Phone: (205) 491-6676

Fax (205) 491-6614 www.entecservices.comEntec Services, Inc. 16-D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, Alabama

35023 Telephone: (205) 491-6676 Fax: (205) 491-6614 Results of the April 19, 2007 Emissions Re-Testing

for Particulate

w/HCI

/ HF on No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber

Stack

at the Cherokee Brick Facility

located

in Macon, Georgia
Submitted to: Cherokee Brick

and Tile Co. 3250 Waterville

Road Macon, Georgia

31206 Attention: Mr. Jim Owens
Entec Project

No. 27147 Completed By:

Art Otero Project Manager Report

Submitted:

April 25, 2007 Reviewed By:

Tom Lotz Technical Services

Manager hereby certify to the best of my knowledge

all field sampling

and laboratory

analysis

performed

for this report is authentic

and accurate.

It has been checked

for completeness

and accuracy.Cherokee Brick

and Tile Co. Table of Contents Section Page No. Executive Summary Emissions

Summary Detailed Test Results I23 Sampling Procedures Location of Test Ports Method 5126A Sampling

Train No.1 No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber

Field Data Sheets Test Run 1 Test Run 2 Test Run 3 Control Room Data Test Protocol Quality Control

I Quality Assurance

Procedures QA/QC Checklist Orifice Check and Temperature

Check Fyrite I Orsat Standardization Laboratory Analysis Equipment Calibrations Nomenclature and Test Calculations 711121314.1822262843495O51567383Executive Summary Cherokee Brick located

in Macon,

Georgia,

retained

Entec Services,

Inc. to perform emissions re-testing

on the No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry Lime Absorber

Stack.

Mr. Art Otero, Mr. Trent McMahan

and Mr. Ryan Harris, of Entec Services,

Inc. conducted

the testing on April 19, 2007. Representing

Cherokee

Brick was Mr. Jim Owens who coordinated

testing with the control

room production

activity.

Representing

the state from the Georgia Department of Natural

Resources

was Mr. Daniel McCain. Entec Services,

Inc. encountered

no difficulties

in the field collection

of the samples

or in the laboratory

analysis

of the samples The emissions

test summary

on the following

page gives a detailed

summary

of each test run compared

to the maximum

emission

limits set forth by the Georgia

Department

of Natural Resources.

Test results

indicate

the emissions

results

were below

the emissions standards

set forth by Permit

No. 3251-021-0167-V-02-0 ID No. PCD01, except for the particulate

emissions

in Ibs/ton

of Fired Brick.Entec Services, Inc. 16-D Commerce

Avenue Hueytown, Alabama

35023 Telephone: (205) 491-6676 Fax: (205) 491-6614 Results of the April 19, 2007 Emissions Re-Testing

for Particulate

w/HCI

/ HF on No. 1 and No. 2 Kilns Dry. Lime Absorber

Stack

at the Cherokee Brick Facility

located

in Macon, Georgia
Submitted to: Cherokee Brick

and Tile Co. 3250 Waterville

Road Macon, Georgia

31206 Attention: Mr. Jim Owens
Entec Project

No. 27147 Completed By:

Art Otero Project Manager Report Submitted:

April 25, 2007 Reviewed By:

Tom Lotz Technical Services

Manager hereby certify to the best of my knowledge

all field sampling

and laboratory

analysis

performed

for this report is authentic

and accurate.

It has been checked

for completeness

and accuracy.Entec Services, Inc. SOURCE OVERVIEW
SOURCE OWNER: Cherokee

Brick and Tile PLANT LOCATION: Macon, GA SOURCE(S) NAME(S): SOURCE(S) CONDITION: SOURCE(S) SHAPE: No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack Brick MACT Re-Test

Higher Production

Rate Cimular PROBE WASH CHEMICAL: SOURCE PERMIT NUMBER: TEST PERFORMED:
REFERENCE METHOD

TESTS:

PROJECT MANAGER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

PROJECT

LEADER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYST

ASSISTANT ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALIST-VE

READERS OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: RULING AGENCY: RULING AGENCY

REPRESENTATIVE: DATES TESTS CONDUCTED: ENTEC PROJECT

NUMBER: Acetone 3251-021o0167-Vo02-0

ID No. PCD01 Lime MACT Subpart JJJJJ Sample Location Volumetric Flow Molecular Weight Moisture Content Particulate Visible Emissions HCI and HF

EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method EPA Method Mr. Lynn Beane Mr. Art Otero Mr. Ryan Harris Mr. Trent McMahan Mr. Jim Owens Georgia Department

of Natural Resources Mr. Daniel McCain 04/19/07 27147 12345926AENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023

Client: Job No.:

27147 Source: Data Input By:

Art Otero
Run Number Test Date Time Test Run Began Ended Sampling Time Stack Area Units Test Data 1 2

3 Military Time minutes 04119/07 0751-0855 6O

04119/07 0928-1030 Cherokee Brick and Tile No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack Field Data

Symbol

0
PbarP•CpY

D.v.

WimpWs•o=CO2 (sqrt AP)•,•

HCLHF
mn

in. Hz0

-0.16

6O

04119/07

-0.23 1059-1202 60 Ftt 22.166

22.166

22.166 Barometric Pressure in. Hg

29.60

29.60

29.60 Stack Static Pressure -0.19 Pitot Tube Correction

factor Meter Correction

Factor Meter Delta H @ •ozzle Diameter Meter Volume AVERAGE

Avg. Orifice Delta H Impingers Weight Gain (Moisture) Silica Gel Impinger Weight Gain (Moisture) Oxygen Concentration,

dry basis Carbon Dioxide Concentration,

dry basis 60
29.60 -0o19 0.84 0.84

0.84

0.84 0.995 0.995

0.995

0.995 inoH• 1.864

1.864

1.864

1.864 inches 0.300

0.300

0.300

0.300 dcf 44.306

43.334

44.186

43.942 Meter Temperature °F

73.3

80.5

87.9

80.6 in. H=0

1.89

1.82

1.81

1.84 g•ms 104.0

102.5

95.3

100.6 g•ms 13.1

13.6

11.5

12.7 17.0 4.0 0.619 17.0
(in. H=0) lrz F 4.0 0.605 352.6 23.8

17.0

mgmgmg Avg. Sq. Rt. of Delta P Stack Temperature 4.0 0.604 356.8 22.7 354.8 24.0 Total Hydrogen

Chloride collected,

m 9 Total Hydrogen

Fluoride collected,

mg Particulate collected 7.5

7.4

7.8 547.9 243.1

29.0

17.0 4.0 0.609 364.7 23.5 7.6 273.3

5ENTEC Services,

Inc.
CALCULA'IED TEST DATA Client: Cherokee Brick and Tile Source: No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack Description

Formulas

Symbol Run Number Test Date Time Began-Ended 1. Stack Pressure P=w P¢113.( 2. Meter Pressure P• •1113.! 3. Standard Meter Volume 17.64- Y* 4a. Standard Volume of Water Va•or Condensed 4b. Standard Volume of Water Collected in Silica Gel !5. Moisture Fraction =(v,.•,•+ v._:_:.:•y(v.•,•

v•.•; v,•,•) 6. Moisture Fraction @ Saturation (Theoretical) 7. Standard Water Volume @ Saturation (Theoretical) 8. Volume of Water @ Saturation (Theoretical) 9. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, dry basis 10. Molecular Weight Of Stack Gas, wet basis 11. Average Stack Gas Velocity 12. Stack Gas Flow @ Stack Conditions :W,•a•/0.0470; 0.32"(Oz}+ 0.44"(CO:)+0.28*(100-(O•(CO•)] M•*( 1.B,,,)+18.0o(B,,,, 85.49"•p*(sqrt •o)=,•*SQRT((TJ
13. Stack Gas Flow @ Standard Conditions 14. Stack Gas Flow @ Dry Standard Conditions 141). Hydrogen Chloride concentration @ Std.Cond..Grains/Cu.Ft. =(0.01S43"HC•,)/Q• 14b. Hydrogen Fluodde concentration @ Std.Cond.,Grains/Cu.Ft. 15. Particulate concentration @ Standard Conditions =15b. Hydrogen Chlodde emissions. Ibs per hour 15b. Hydrogen Fluoride emissions, Ibs per hour 21. Particulate emissions 22. Volume collected through nozzle 23. Particulate concentration.

(• actual conditions =0.01543"n•N.x,= =(s0n0e0)"H• •-O,= =TJP=*|0.002669*V•+ Job No.:

27147 Data Input By: Art Otaro Units Calculated Data 2 3 AVERAGE 04/19/07 04/19/07

04/19/07 M,•ryT•e 0751-0855

0928-1030

1059-1202 P, in. Hg 29.59

29.58

29.59

29.59 P•a in. Hg 29.74

29.73

29.73

29.74 v,,• •scf 43.363

41.841

42.085

42.430 ;'*,•,e 4.•4

4.oz,•

4.•)

4.734 v•.•_, scf 0.618

0.641

0.542

0.600 B, fr=.•,,•

0.1128

0.1155

O.1067

0.1117 "m,,, ;'.•;;•,

9.3333

9.0833

9.5810

9.3326 •,• scf -48.566

-47.018

-46.990

-47.524 W• ml -1031.8

-998.9

-998.3

-1009.7 M= g/0-mole

29.320

29.320

29.320

29.320 M, g/g-moin

28.043

28.012

28.112

28.056 v, rUs 44.02

43.05

42.96

43.346 o• acfm 58.552

57,257

57.138

57.649 Q, scrm 37.509

36,771

36,507

36,929 Q,,, a=•r., 33,279

32,523

32,611

32,804 HCLcs §d,;•.•.;

0.009

0.009

0.008

0.009 HFcs •,;•;=t.•

0.003

0.003

0.003

0.003 c, or/dsc• 0.1950

0.0896

0.0106

0.0984 HCI -;;.=%• Ibs/hr

2.44

2.44

2.33

2.40 HF -•bs•h• Ibs/hr

0.76

0.76

0.80

0.77 PMR Ib/hr 55.61

24.99

2.97

27.86 v. acf 76.296

73,664

73,738

74,566 ¢, 8r/acf 0.1108

0.0509

0.0061

0.0559 24. Isokinetic Sampling Rate, Percent 100*Vnl (60"vz*•'9)

% 98.07

96.83

97.13

97.34 Post Meter Odfice Cal. ,EMC ALT-00S Yqa, Y, ;iiiiiii!ili•iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

1.0269

1.0360

1.0195

1.0275 • Difference. (=lib=on must be within 6% of original YJactor) iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii•iii•ili•ii;i•;i;i;iii;iProceduresProcedures The

particulate

hydrogen

chloride

and hydrogen

fluoride

emissions

were determined

using EPA Methods

1-5/26A,

and 9, CFR Title 40, Part 60, Appendix

A. The calibration

and quality assurance

procedures

of EPA CFR 40 Part 60 Appendix

A for all methods,

and the "Quality Assurance

Handbook

for Air Pollution

Measurement

System"

Volume

III Stationary Source-Specific

Methods

were followed

throughout

the duration

of the field and laboratory testing. The most current

version

for each method

(as described

in the Federal

Register)

was used. Stack Gas Volumetric

Flow The velocity

of the gas stream was determined

according

to EPA Reference

Method

1 and 2 by reading

the instantaneous

velocity

head with an inclined

manometer

at each sampling point with a calibrated

S-type pitot tube attached

adjacent

to the sample

nozzle. The stack pressure

was measured

with the static side of an S-type pitot tube. A calibrated pyrometer was used to measure

stack temperature

at each sampling

point. Stack Gas Molecular

Weight The carbon

dioxide

and oxygen

concentrations

were determined

using EPA Reference. Method 3 (Fyrite Method).

A sample

of the flue gas was extracted

from the gas stream during each test. These samples

were analyzed

with a Fyrite gas analyzer.

The molecular weight of the gas was calculated

using the moisture,

oxygen

and carbon

dioxide

content and the measured

stack gas temperature. Moisture Content The moisture

content

used for calculating

the gas stream

flow rate was determined

by measuring the amount

of condensed

moisture

in the glass impinger

and silica gel impinger in the sampling

train as described

in EPA Reference

Method

4 at the completion

of each test. The moisture

collection

system

consists

of a series of 4 impingers

connected

to a silica gel impinger attached

to the outlet.

Ice is placed

around

the impingers.

The outlettemperature of the impingers

are monitored

and recorded

throughout

the duration

of the testing to verify the temperature

is below <68 o F. Hydrogen Chloride

I Fluoride

withParticulatePreliminary data was used to determine

stack temperature,

pressure,

and range of velocity heads,

moisture

content

and stack gas dry molecular

weight prior to sampling. The meter box was leak checked

from the pump to the orifice.

Initial and final leak checks of the sampling

system

and pitot lines were performed

as outlined

in Method

5 and were recorded on the data sheets.

The nozzle was calibrated

before and after the test using a micrometer and was also recorded

on the field data sheets. The sampling

probe was placed at each sampling

point to provide

a total sampling

time of at least 60 minutes

and a volume

of at least 31.8 cubic feet. The gases were drawn through a teflon coated nozzle attached

to a heated

glass lined probe.

The probe hot box was maintained

at the proper setting to obtain a temperature

of > 248 0 F. The gases then proceeded through

borosilicate

glass filter holder, with a Teflon frit filter support

through

a tarred Teflon or quartz fiber filter to remove

particulate

matter.

The exit of the filter was maintained at a temperature

of > 248 o F. These temperatures

were recorded

at each point on the field data sheets. The gases were then scrubbed

through

a series of four impingers

to capture

hydrogen halides, and moisture.

The optional

moisture

knockout

impinger

was not used in the sample train. The first and second

impingers

contained

approximately

100 ml of a 0.1N H2SO4 solution

and the third and fourth impingers

contained

approximately

100 ml of a 0.1 N NaOH solution.

The fifth impinger

contained

pre weighed

silica gel to remove

any remaining moisture.

The gases passed

through

the impinger

series in an ice bath to maintain a maximum

exit temperature

of 68 0 F. This temperature

was also recorded

on the field data sheets.

The clean and cool gases then entered

the meter box where the gas flow and temperature

were measured. After the completion

of each test run leak rate determinations

were made and recorded

on the field data sheets.

Then the sampling

train and the probe nozzle

assembly

were

9transferred to the cleanup

area making

sure no particulate

was lost. The cleanup

data was also recorded

on the field data sheets and / or the laboratory

checklist

sheet. Particulate catches

were placed

in sealed

petri dishes.

Each acetone

rinse from the nozzle, probe, and filter holder were combined

and placed in a sealed container.

The first, and second

impingers

were weighed

and transferred

to its container

and the rinsing

from the glassware

will be added to this container.

The third and fourth impinger

contents

were weighed for moisture

determination

calculations

but were not kept for analysis.

The silica gel from the fifth impinger

was transferred

to its respective

tarred container

and weighed. For the group of tests an acetone

blank, sulfuric

acid solution,

distg eled water and acetone of approximately

200 milliliters

were placed

in a sealed container.

These containers

were clearly marked

and transported

to the laboratory

for analysis. Enthalpy performed

all of the laboratory

analysis

and is an approved

Louisiana

accredited lab (Certification

Number

04010)

that meets all requirements

for the State of Georgia approved and accredited

laboratory. Visual Emissions Trent McMahan

from Entec Services,

Inc. stood at a distance

sufficient.to

provide

a clear view of the emissions

with the sun oriented

in the 140 ° sector to his back. Consistent

with maintaining the above requirement,

the observer

did, as much as possible;

make his observations from a position

such that his line of vision is approximately

perpendicular

to the plume direction.

The observer's

line of sight did not include

more than one plume at a time when multiple

stacks

are involved,

and in any case the observer

did make his observations with his line of sight perpendicular

to the longer axis of such a set of multiple stacks (e.g., stub stacks on bag-houses).

The observer

recorded

the name of the plant, emission location,

facility type, observer's

name and affiliation,

and the date on a field data sheet. The time, estimated

distance

to the emission

location,

approximate

wind direction, estimated wind speed, description

of the sky condition

(presence

and color of clouds),

and plume background

are recorded

on the field data sheets at the time opacity

readings

are initiated and completed.

Observations

were made in fifteen-second

intervals

and recorded in increments

of 5%. The baghouse

was observed

for three one hour runs in conjunction with the Method

5 / 26A testing.

10Entec Services,

Inc 16 D Commerce

Ave. Hue•p•n

AL 35023 STACK DRAWING

& TRAVERSE

POINT LOCATION Client: Cherokee

Brick and Tile Job No. 27147 Source: No.l and Noo2 DLA Stack Input By: Art Otero Type of Traverse: Velocity (V) or Particulate

(P):

P Stack Diameter, inches:

63.75 Stack Height, feat:

100 Stack Properties:

Inches

Duct Diameters

Port Type

Flange

Port Diameter

6.0" Stack Area, Ft2: 22.166 Number of Ports: 2 Length of Port, inches: 8.25 Upstream Disturbance:

170.0 Downstream Disturbance:

684.0

2.67 10.73

Total Number of Traverse Points: Number of Points per diameter:. 126 63.8 INCHES

170.(]

684.0

INCHES

NCHES

Point No.

Inside Stack

Outside Nipple Inches Inches 1 2.8 11.1 2 9.3 17.6 3 18.9 27.1 4 44.9 63.1 5 54.4 62.7 6 60.9 69.2

Adjusted points diameter > 24" no point closer than 1.0 inch Adjusted points diameter<

24" no point closer than 0.5 inch Stack Diameters between 12-24 inches minimum points are 8 4 points per port if the 8 2 diameters downstream

and upstream cdteria is met.Method 5/26A

Sampling Train

Filter Exit Temperature (>248 F)

npinger

npinger # #2: 100ml 1.00ml O.1N O.1N i•SO• t•SO•

npmger #30.1N •aOH

Impinger Exit Temperature (<68 F)

mplnger rap: n[ #4 • 5

Exhaust O00000 Temp. and Flow Controllers Temperature Dry Gas MeterField Data

Sheets No. 1 & No. 2 Kilns

Dry Lime

Absorber

Stack

13Run No.

1 Field Data

SheetsENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce

Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023
Client: Cherokee

Brick and Tile Test Date:

4/1912007 Source: No,1 and No.2 DLA Stack Run Number:

1

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN

CHLORIDE

HYDROGEN

FLOURIDE

FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD

5/26A

1-1 0.43

0.t•55i

z.lz 1-2 0.34

0.5831

1.67 1-3 0,36

0.6000

1.77 1-41-51-62-12-22-32-42-52-6

K-Factor 4.92 0.42 0,43 0.34 0.41

0.6481

0,37 0.6557 0.5831 0.6403

2.07 2.12 1.67

0.6083 2.02

OO•1- 355

67 355 69 355356354355

1.82 70727374 0.46 0.6782

2.26

355

75 0.44 0.6633

2.16

355

77 355 77 0.6083 1.82

354354 1.23 0.37 0.25 0.5000 8O79

0.39 0.6187

1.89

354.8

73.3

15ENTEC SERVICES

INC. EPA METHOD

9 VISIBLE

EMISSION

OBSERVATION

FORM
•CA•ON: •¢o. =MISSIONS SOURCE: • L•

D•T•CE FROM SOURCE: OI•C•ON FO• •U•E: CONDITIONS DURING OBSERVATION:

START

END WIND DIRECTION

FROM: WIND SPEED: AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: WET-BULB TEMPERATURE: SKY CONDmONS: BACKGROUND COLOR: PLUME COLORi CLOCK TIME:SECONDS SECONDS

13 0 0 0 D 1• ODD

MIN 0 15 30 45 150000

17 [) • •_• O

•, • O O0 l•O 0 • •

• O0

O o =•ODDO •000 •oo•

EII•SSIONS POINT SUN

• WIND DIRECTION
PLUME & STACK SYMBOL KEY

140

DRAW NORTH ARROW

SUN LOCATION UNE CONDENSED WATER IN THE PLUME?

•J •) ATTACHED: DETACHED: VE CORRESPONDS

TO COMPLIANCE

TEST RUN NO.: SECONDS SECONDS

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

OBSERVERS NAME: (PRINT) OBSERVERS SIGNATURE: OBSERVATION TEST DATE: ERFORMED BY: CERTIFIED BY:

CAA• CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION

DATES:

LECTURE: r•+

ENTEC SERVICES,

INC. TOTAL MINUTES OBSERVED: HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE: ALLOWABLE OPACITY: (PERCENT) No. SMA'$ EXCEEOING

ALLOWABLE: CERTIFICATION NUMBER: (ADEM)
17Run No.

2 Field Data

SheetsENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Client: Cherokee

Brick and Tile Test Date:

4/1912007 Source: No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack Run Numbe•

2

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN

CHLORIDE

HYDROGEN

FLOURIDE

FIELD DATA• EPA METHOD

5/26A

1-11-21-31-41-51-62-12-22-32-42-5 0.42 0.44 0.43 0.36 0.28 0.32 0.40 0.38 0.34 0.34 0.41

K-Factor 4.94 2-6 0.30

0.37

u.u481

2.07 0.6633 2.17 0.6557 2.12 0.6000 1.78 0.5292 1.38 0.5657 1.58 0.6325 1.98 0.6164 1.88 0.5831 1.68

352

78 352 78 352 79 353 79 353 80 352 80 352 80 353 81 353 82 0.5831 1.68

354

82 0.6403 2.03

354

83 0.5477 1.48

351

84

0.6054 1.82

352.6

80.5o•o°•

o

EEE l -IENTEC SERVICES

INC. EPA METHOD

9 VISIBLE

EMISSION

OBSERVATION

FORM N
..•s,o,s souRcE:

•L co. o o cE: 0

DI•oN Eo• SOURCE: CONDITIONS DURING OBSERVATION:

START WIND DIRECTION

FROM: END WiND SPEED: AMBIENT TEMPERATURE: WETBULB TEMPERATURE: RH% SKY CONDmONS: PLUME BACKGROUND: BACKGROUND COLOR: PLUME COLORi CLOCK TIME: EMmSIONS P•NT <• SUN

• WIND DIRECTION
PLUME & STACK SYMBOL KEY DRAW NORTH ARROW

CONDENSED WATER IN THE PLUME?

M • ATTACHED: DETACHED: VE CORRESPONDS

TO COMPUANCE

TEST RUN NO.: SECONDS SECONDS SECONDS SECONDS MIN 0 15 30 45 •O•DO,O •00•

•o •0•
• 0450000
• 0 0 0 O
• 00.0

0 .ODO•

MIN 0 15 30 45

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:

OBSERVERS SIGNATURE: OBSERVATION TEST DATE: •ERFORMED BY: CERTIFIED BY: 0'7 ENTEC SERVICES,

INC. c A,LI. CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION

DATES:

LECTURE: TOTAL MINUTES OBSERVED: HIGHEST SIX MINUTE AVERAGE: ALLOWABLE OPACITY: (PERCENT) No. SMA'S EXCEEDING

ALLOWABLE: CER, TIFICATION

NUMBER: (ADEM) F,E•: •/•'Vo7 21Run No.

3 F•e,d Data

SheetsENTEC Services,

Inc. 16-D Commerce Ave. Hueytown, Alabama 35023 Client: Cherokee

Brick and Tile Test Date:

4/1912007 Source: No.1 and No.2 DLA Stack Run Numbe•.

3

PARTICULATE Wl HYDROGEN

CHLORIDE

HYDROGEN

FLOURIDE

FIELD DATA, EPA METHOD

5/26A

1-2 0,42

0.6481

2.07

356

82 1-3 0.32

0,5657

1.58

356

85 1-4 0.37

0.6083

1.83

356

86 1-5 0,41

0.6403

2.03

357

89 1-6 0.33

0.5745

1.63

355

88 2-1 0.38

0.6164

1.88

357

88 2-2 0,44

0.6633

2.17

357

90 2-3 0.35

0.5916

1.73

357

90 2-4 0.36

0.6000

1.78

358

91 2-5 0.33

0.5745

1.63

359

92 2-6 0.28

0.5292

1.38

359

92

K-Factor 4.94 0.37

0.6037

1.81

356.8

87.9
230

oiENTEC SERVICES

INC. EPA METHOD

9 VISIBLE

EMISSION

OBSERVATION

FORM

BULB TEMPERATURE: pu•e BACKGRO..D: 5V. y- • •
PLUME COLOR:
SECONDS DRA•N NORTH ARROW

CONDENSED WATER IN THE PLUME?

I• • ATrACHED: DETACHED: VE CORRESPONDS

TO COMPLIANCE

TEST RUN NO.: SECONDS SECONDS SECONDS

OBSERVATION TEST DATE:

q- lq 0 '7 '-"RFORMED BY:

ENTEC SERI/ICF.•,

INC. CERTIFIED BY:

•

J_ /I/ CERTIFICATION EXPIRATION

DATES: LECTURE: HIGHEST SiX MINUTE AVERAGE:

/_(•/ ALLOWABLE OPACITY: (PERCENT) No. SMA•J EXCEEDING

ALLOWABLE: CE .RTIFICATION

NUMBER: (ADEM)

25Control Room

Process

Data

2 ̧6,Production Data The following

information

was received

by email from Mr. Jim Owens

of Cherokee

Brick And Tile Company

for the testing performed

at their facility in Macon,

Georgia,

on April 19, 2007. The brick being fired were queen size in both kilns. The production

data during

the test for the emission

rate was: Lingl Kiln No. 1 (Queen)

= 16.52 tons of fired brick per hour Lingl Kiln No. 2 (Queen)

= 16.83 tons of fired brick per hour The limestone

usage was 186.83 pounds/hour.
The average

differential

pressure

of H20 was: 06:00 am 9:00 am

0.73 09:00 am 12:00 noon

0.70 12:00 noon -03:00

pm

0.72