Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of 

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

 Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 99-214 Date: August 24, 1999 

Subject: Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance: Revised Incontestability

Information

Background

On January 12, 1995, we issued Benefits Administration Letter (BAL) 95-203 on incontestability,

which is a clause in the Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) contract. We reissued

this information on March 9, 1998, as part of BAL 98-201.

Pub. L. 105-311, the Federal Employees Life Insurance Improvement Act, which was enacted

October 30, 1998, made incontestability part of the law and made some changes to the provision. 

The statutory changes apply to any findings made on or after October 30, 1998.

Purpose

The purpose of this BAL is to provide agencies with the revised information on incontestability. 

You should no longer use the incontestability information in BALs 95-203 and 98-201.

What is Incontestability?

Incontestability is allowing erroneous coverage to remain in effect under certain conditions.

What Are the Conditions that Allow Erroneous Coverage to Remain in Effect?

There are two conditions: 1) the coverage must have been in effect for at least 2 years before the

error is discovered, and 2) the employee (or annuitant or compensationer) must have paid the

applicable premiums for the erroneous coverage while it was in effect.

Incontestability doesn’t apply unless both conditions are met.
-2-

What Are Some Examples of When Incontestability WOULD Apply?

Example 1 Sharon returned to Federal service after a break of 120 days. Before she

left, she had Basic and Option C. When she returned to service, she

elected Basic, Option B, and Option C. Although an employee cannot

elect more coverage unless the break in service is at least 180 days, her

agency erroneously accepted the election. If at least 2 years go by before

anyone discovers the error, and if the agency withholds the premiums for

the erroneous coverage during that time, Sharon can keep the Option B

coverage.

Example 2 Carlos had Basic insurance. He got married and elected 5 multiples of

Option B and 5 multiples of Option C. Although his marriage only entitled

him to elect 1 multiple of Option B, his agency erroneously accepted the

election. If at least 2 years go by before anyone discovers the error, and if

the agency withholds the premiums for the erroneous coverage during that

time, Carlos can keep the 4 extra multiples of Option B coverage.

Example 3 As a new employee, Natalie elects Basic insurance and 1 multiple of Option

B. Her agency erroneously codes her SF 50 as H0 (Basic, Option A, and 1

multiple of Option B). If at least 2 years go by before anyone discovers the

error, and if the agency withholds the premiums for the erroneous coverage

during that time, Natalie can keep the Option A coverage.

Example 4 Jason was hired as a temporary employee. As such, he was not eligible for

FEGLI coverage. His agency erroneously allowed him to elect FEGLI

coverage. If at least 2 years go by before anyone discovers the error, and if

the agency withholds the premiums for the erroneous coverage during that

time, Jason can keep the FEGLI coverage.

Example 5 Mary had Basic and Option C for 15 years. During the 1999 open

enrollment period, she elected 5 multiples of Option B and 5 multiples of

Option C. Mary retires 12/31/01. Her retirement system erroneously

allows her to continue her Option B coverage into retirement, although she

doesn’t meet the 5-year/all opportunity requirement. If at least 2 years go

by before anyone discovers the error, and if the retirement system

withholds the premiums for the erroneous coverage during that time, Mary

can keep the Option B coverage.

Example 6 Tyrone is a part-time employee. The full-time salary for his position is

$47,500; Tyrone works half-time and earns $23,750. His agency

erroneously gives him Basic insurance based on the full-time salary, and

withholds premiums based on that amount. If at least 2 years go by before

anyone discovers the error, and if premiums based on the incorrect amount

continue to be withheld during that time, Tyrone can keep the erroneous
-3-

amount of insurance. 

NOTE: Once the error is discovered, the agency cannot compound the

error by continuing to increase the amount of insurance due to salary

increases. Salary increases would have no effect on the amount of

insurance, unless Tyrone moved to a full-time position, or unless his parttime salary eventually “caught up” with the erroneous insurance amount.

Example 7 Simon had Basic insurance. During the 1999 open enrollment period, he

elected Option A and 2 multiples of Option B. Instead of making his new

coverage effective in April of 2000, his agency erroneously made it

effective in April of 1999 and began to withhold the premiums for the new

coverage. Simon retires in May of 2004, and the agency discovers the

error in effective date. Since the error was made more than 2 years before,

and Simon paid the premiums for that extra year of coverage, the

erroneous effective date is allowed to stand. Simon would therefore meet

the 5-year requirement for continuing the coverage into retirement.

What Are Some Examples of When Incontestability WOULD NOT Apply?

Example 8 As a new employee, Tony elects Basic, 2 multiples of Option B, and 1

multiple of Option C. His agency erroneously codes his SF 50 as I1 (Basic,

1 multiple of Option B, and 1 multiple of Option C), and withholds

premiums based on the erroneous code. After 3 years, they discover the

error and notify Tony. Tony doesn’t want to pay 3 years worth of back

premiums for the 2nd multiple of Option B.

There is no erroneous coverage here. There is only an error in

withholding. Tony correctly elected 2 multiples of Option B, but the

agency only withheld premiums for 1. You cannot use incontestability to

allow an employee (or annuitant or compensationer) to avoid paying

premiums. The nonpayment of premiums is an overpayment of pay. As

with any overpayment, agencies have the authority to waive collection of

the amount due. However, agencies must send us the total amount of the

premium due, whether or not they collect it from the employee.

Example 9 Maria returned to Federal service after a break of 2 years. Before she left

she had Basic, Option A, and 2 multiples of Option B. When she returned

to Federal service, she did not submit an SF 2817. Her agency erroneously

gave her only Basic insurance and withheld the premiums only for Basic

insurance. Two years later they discover the error and inform Maria that

she should have gotten back the same insurance she had when she left

Government. Maria doesn’t want to pay the premiums for this coverage.

Since Maria didn’t submit an SF 2817 electing a different amount of

coverage, Maria automatically got back the coverage she had before. As in
-4-

Example 7 above, the failure to withhold premiums is an overpayment of

pay. The agency must send us the back premiums as soon as it discovers

the error and then decide whether to collect the overpayment from Maria

or whether to waive collection of the overpayment.

Example 10 As a new employee Charlene waived all FEGLI coverage. Two years later

she has a physical, which OFEGLI (the Office of Federal Employees’

Group Life Insurance) approves. She submits an SF 2817 electing Basic, 3

multiples of Option B, and 5 multiples of Option C. Although an employee

cannot elect Option C based on a physical exam, her agency erroneously

accepts her election and starts withholding the premiums. Eighteen months

later Charlene’s husband dies. She files a claim, which OFEGLI denies. 

Charlene feels that since the agency accepted her election and she paid the

premiums, she is entitled to coverage.

Since the erroneous Option C coverage was not in effect 2 years before the

error was discovered, incontestability does not apply. The agency must

void the Option C coverage and refund the Option C premiums.

What Happens If the Employee Doesn’t Want the Erroneous Coverage?

If the employee (or annuitant or compensationer) doesn’t want the erroneous coverage, he/she

may cancel it. However, the cancellation is prospective. There is no refund of premiums.

Applying Incontestability

When you discover an error in which an employee received coverage that he/she was not entitled

to, you must check to see if the incontestability provision would apply in that case. Ask the

following questions:

• Has the erroneous coverage been in effect for at least 2 years?

• Has the employee been paying premiums for the erroneous coverage during that

time?

If the answer to both questions is “yes,” then incontestability applies.

Documenting the File

Once you have determined that incontestability applies, you must prepare a note to the file

explaining the details of the error, the date it occurred, and the date it was discovered; verifying

that premiums have been paid; and stating that the enrollment is now valid due to incontestability. 

If there is an applicable SF 2817 in the file, you must attach the notice to the permanent file copy

of the SF 2817. When an employee for whom you have used incontestability retires, you must

send the notice to the retirement system, along with all other life insurance forms.
-5-

Whenever you prepare an SF 2821 for an employee for whom you have used incontestability, you

must note in the Remarks section that incontestability was used to allow an erroneous enrollment

to stand.

Note Regarding Annuitants

If a retirement system erroneously allows an annuitant to continue Basic insurance into retirement,

the annuitant can keep the coverage if at least 2 years go by before the error is discovered and if

the annuitant pays the applicable premiums during that time. If at the time of retirement, the

individual did not make a post-65 reduction election, he/she will automatically get 75%

Reduction. There is no opportunity to make a retroactive election for 50% Reduction or No

Reduction.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy

 and Information Division