alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 1060 Directorate Identifier: 2011NM015AD

310 - 28 - 2148, R04 --- 4/14/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
Exhibit
32.2




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March
31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
Tad M. Ballantyne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to
my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/ Tad M. BallantyneTad
      M. BallantyneChief
      Financial OfficerDate:
      May 8, 2009
DEPARTMENT OF TRAi'lSPORTATlON [4910-I3-P]

r.o~CU'""~CES" ROUTIM, S"MilOL Federal Aviation Administration r~LTLAL-"I"IG 14CFR Purt 39 DATE [Docket No. FAA-2010-0229; Directorate Identifier l009-NM-115-AD; Amendmen

# ot~sn,"~~ 1&35':' 2010-14-/1 !I1JM- /LI 39-*****" AD 

###  -** -**1 INITI"I.S'SIG 

## , ~ ~CW'" R1N 2120-AA64 

# {; nit Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, roc. lOde! DHC-8-400 Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FA.A.),Department ofTransportation (DOT). R01ITlNG 51'Mool.

I>ATE ACTION: Final rule. 

## A NNl - 01 INmAL~''''G SUMMARY: We are adopting anew airwortHiness directive (AD) forthe products list d ,

# ~\,a~
above. This AD results from mandatory continLng airworthiness mfonnation (MCAI) 

# :E,,~_~", t» originated byan aviation authority ofanother luntry to identify and correct an unsafe INIlHI.S:SlG condition on anaviation product The MCAI dfscribes the w1safecondition as: k,wmo.---- Certain main landing 

### gear components 

### raveexperienced premature failure 

### k""oomn"",~,"rM"""",:-- during certification testing. Revision

# hrs been made tothe DHC-8-400 INITI"S,,1G Maintenance Requirements Manual, Airworthiness Limitation Items, to incorporate the revised safe life limits forthe main landing gear lock actuator assembly, retraction actuator aksembly rod end and piston, and the upper bearing in the main landing 

### gbar shock strut assembly. Failure
, ofthese components could adversely afeet the structural integrity ofthe main landing gear.



### * * 

## * * 

## * * * We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these products.
GOVERNOR SEAN PARNEl.l.3Iij jUN 13 A II: 10

THE STATE

ofALASKA

May30,2014

-:])~lfa'Etm6~tof Commerce, Comm~nity,

<"j?O~~~TIO'~,and Economic Development

'vl,e I OPc, u,JIOI~S

DIVISION OF COMMUNITY AND REGIONAL AFFAIRS

550 West Seven1h Avenue. Suite 1640

AnChorage. Ala,ka 99501

Main: 907.269.4501/907.269.4581

Program, fox: 907.269."539

Kevin Schlemmer, Ollef

Essential Air Service & Domestic Analysis Division United States Department of Transportation

1200 New Jersey Ave SE

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Mr. Schlemmer,

On May 28, 2014 Governor Sean Parnell sigried Alaska's operating budget bill for SFY15. T\Je

budget period is July 1, 2014 - June 30, 2015. Within the operating budget for the Department of

Commerce, Community, and Economic Development, Division of Community and Regional

Affairs (DCCED/DCRA), is a $200,000 allocation for a grant to Kawerak, Inc. The purpose of the

grant is the pay the 50% local share under a contract for the Air Transportation to Non-Eligible

Places (AlNEP) program for Diomede, Alaska.

We expect to have a grant in place quickly with Kawerak, Inc for this grant. The grant period will

stan July 1,2014, so any activity occurring on or after that date will be ~ligible to be paid under this

grant.

If you have any questions about the availability of this funding, please let me know.

Sincerely,

.-e~

Director

cc: Pauletta Bourne, DCRA, Grant Administrator

Pearl Mikulski, Kawerak Inc.

Richard Sewell, AK DOT&PF
Exhibit 21




            LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY


Listed below are subsidiaries of the registrant at December 31, 1997.
Certain subsidiaries are omitted since such companies considered in the
aggregate do not constitute a significant subsidiary.


                                                    State or Jurisdiction
                                                     in Which Subsidiary
                                                      Was Incorporated
         Name of Company                                or Organized
         ---------------                            ---------------------

66 Pipe Line Company                                      Delaware
American Olefins, Inc.                                    Delaware
GPM Anadarko Gathering Company                            Delaware
GPM Gas Corporation                                       Delaware
Phillips Alaska Natural Gas Corporation                   Delaware
Phillips China Inc.                                       Liberia
Phillips Coal Company                                     Nevada
Phillips Gas Company                                      Delaware
Phillips Investment Company                               Nevada
Phillips Oil Company (Nigeria) Limited                    Nigeria
Phillips Petroleum Canada Ltd.                            Canada
Phillips Petroleum Company Indonesia                      Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Company Norway                         Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Company United Kingdom Limited         England
Phillips Petroleum Company Western Hemisphere             Delaware
Phillips Petroleum International Corporation              Panama
Phillips Petroleum International Corporation Denmark      Cayman Islands
Phillips Petroleum International Investment Company       Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Resources, Ltd.                        Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Timor Sea Inc.                         Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Timor Sea Pty Ltd                      New South Wales
Phillips Petroleum UK Investment Corporation              Delaware
Phillips Petroleum Venezuela L.L.C.                       Delaware
Phillips Pipe Line Company                                Delaware
Phillips Pt. Arguello Production Company                  Delaware
Phillips Puerto Rico Core Inc.                            Delaware
Phillips Texas Pipeline Company, Ltd.                     Texas
Phillips-New Mexico Partners, L.P.                        Delaware
Phillips-San Juan Partners, L.P.                          Delaware
Sooner Insurance Company                                  Vermont
The Largo Company                                         Delaware
WesTTex 66 Pipeline Company                               Delaware


<PAGE>
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY REGION IX

Elizabeth Kelly Redding Public Library 1100 Parkview Avenue Redding, CA 96001 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105

November 7, 2013

Subject: Request to retain public documents atthe Redding Public Library for public inspection DearMs. Kelly: The purpose ofthis letter is to request that the Redding Public Library retainthe enclosed documents at the library for at least sixty (60) days for public inspection. These documents are the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's preliminary decision for the proposed Clean AirAct Prevention ofSignificant Deteriorationpermit for the expansion ofthe Sierra Pacific Industries facility located in Anderson, California. These documents are currently available for public comment. Please contact me at (415) 947-4156 or kelly.shaheerah@epa.gov ifyou have any questions.

Enclosures

# Sin~

# ~eerah Kelly, Envirorunental Engineer Air Division, Permits Office
**Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement on Form S-3 ofour reports dated March 1, 2007 and February 24, 2006 relating to the financial statements,financial statement schedule, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, whichappear in Trico Marine Services, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2006. We also consent to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such RegistrationStatement./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew Orleans, Louisiana
[No. 18063-8-III.

Division Three.

December 14, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. John Freeman Young, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Klickitat County, No. 98-1-00051-3, E. Thompson Reynolds, J., entered November 2, 1998. *Reversed*by unpublished opinion per Schultheis, J., concurred in by Brown, A.C.J., and Sweeney, J.
<PAGE>
 
                                   Exhibit 23
                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS



We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
of Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. of our report dated March 4, 1997, included in the
Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. 1996 Annual Report.

Our audit also included the financial statement schedule of Pitt-Des Moines,
Inc. listed in Item 14(a).  This schedule is the responsibility of the Company's
management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion based on our audits.
In our opinion, the financial statement schedule referred to above, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
present fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

We also consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form S-8 (No. 33-34787) pertaining to the Stock Option Plan of 1990 of Pitt-
Des Moines, Inc.; Form S-8 (No. 333-13043) pertaining to the Pitt-Des Moines,
Inc. Directors Stock Plan of our report dated March 4, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements incorporated herein by reference, and our
report included in the preceding paragraph with respect to the financial
statement schedule included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Pitt-Des
Moines, Inc.



                                     /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
                                          



Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
March 26, 1997
Exhibit 10.7

 

SECOND AMENDMENT

TO THE

LUTHER BURBANK SAVINGS

AMENDED & RESTATED

SALARY CONTINUATION AGREEMENT

FOR

VICTOR S. TRIONE

 

THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is adopted this 2nd day of May, 2016, by and between LUTHER BURBANK SAVINGS, a California corporation located in Santa Rosa, California (the “Bank”) and VICTOR TRIONE (the “Executive”).

 

The Bank and the Executive executed the Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement effective as of April 25, 2006 (the “Agreement”).

 

The Bank and the Executive executed the First Amendment to the Luther Burbank Savings Amended and Restated Salary Continuation Agreement effective as of December 5, 2008 (the “First Amendment”).

 

The undersigned hereby amend the Agreement for the purpose of adjusting the Normal Retirement Date and fixing the amount of the Normal Retirement Benefit. Therefore, the following changes shall be made:

 

Section 1.11 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

 

1.11                       “Normal Retirement Date” means the first day following the Separation from Service by the Executive as an employee of the Bank.

 

Section 2.1.1 of the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following:

 

2.1.1       Amount of Benefit.  The annual benefit under this Section 2.1 is Three Hundred Eighteen Thousand Four Hundred Dollars ($318,400).

 

IN WITNESS OF THE ABOVE, the Bank and the Executive hereby consent to this First Amendment.

 

	
Executive
    	
 
    	
LUTHER   BURBANK SAVINGS
    
	
 
    	
 
    	
 
    
	
 
    	
 
    	

    
	
VICTOR   TRIONE
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 14, 2017.

I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes 

of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto 

affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Court of Appeals 

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA, June 14, 2017

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order

A17D0461. CLYDE F. HOLLAND v. PHEOBE SUMTER MEDICAL CENTER et al. .

Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be 

hereby DENIED.

LC NUMBERS:

2017CV00068
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Certification of Chief Financial Officer



In  connection  with the Quarterly Report of  Igen Networks Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the six months ending November 30, 2009 as filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the "Report"), I, Richard Gilbertson, Chief Financial Officer certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.













: May 11, 2010            /s/

Richard Gilbertson

-------------------           -----------------------------------



Richard Gilbertson,

Chief Financial Officer

















---
# C_2023184EN.01010201.xml

| 25.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 184/102 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 184/102

---

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE))’

(COM(2023 63 final – 2022/025 (COD))

(2023/C 184/19)

| Referral | European Parliament, 13.2.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| | Council, 21.2.2023 |
| Legal basis | Articles 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |
| Section responsible | Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment |
| Adopted at plenary | 22.3.2023 |
| Plenary session No | 577 |
| Outcome of vote
  (for/against/abstentions) | 194/0/3 |

Referral

European Parliament, 13.2.2023

Council, 21.2.2023

Legal basis

Articles 192(1) and 304 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Section responsible

Section for Agriculture, Rural Development and the Environment

Adopted at plenary

22.3.2023

Plenary session No

577

Outcome of vote

(for/against/abstentions)

194/0/3

Since the Committee unreservedly endorses the contents of the proposal and has already set out its views on the subject in its earlier opinion CESE 5002/2014, adopted on 12 November 2014 (1), it decided to issue an opinion endorsing the proposed text and to refer to the position it had taken in the above mentioned document.

Brussels, 22 March 2023.

The President of the European Economic and Social Committee

Christa SCHWENG

---

(1)  OJ C 230, 14.7.2015, p. 91.

1

---
#### DISMUKES v. DISMUKES.

No. 8949.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Dec. 21, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 18, 1933.

*520Atlas Jones, of Uvalde, for appellant.

Bitzler H. Jones, of Uvalde, for appellee.

' SMITH, J.

This is a controversy between a divorced mother and father over the custody of their six year old son. Under existing orders of the trial court the boy is awarded to the custody of his father on Sunday? and of his mother during the remainder of the time.

Originally, when the divorce was decreed on September 17, 1029, the father was granted the custody of his son two hours a week, but this order was modified on September 15, 1931, as it now is. The present action is in the form of a new suit to further modify the order so as to extend the father’s custody of the boy.

The matter was heard by a jury, who found in response to a special issue that “conditions affecting the welfare of the child” have not “changed” since the last decree regulating its custody. Upon this finding the trial judge denied any relief to the father, who has appealed.

There was a great deal of testimony in the /case, consisting largely of small bickerings between the parents of the unfortunate and helpless victim of the controversy. Much óf the testimony was inadmissible and had no bearing upon the paramount issue of what is for the best interest of the child, except to disclose the miserable tragedy which has thrust him into a domestic no man’s land,' across which he is bandied back and forth between the hates and jealousies of his divorced parents.

We conclude that the evidence does not warrant a disturbance of the existing situation, since the child cannot be removed from the custody of both parents. The jury had no guide in the evidence to enable them to compare prior conditions with those existing after the last decree or to advisedly answer the sole issue submitted to them, yet the trial judge heard the evidence and declined to set aside the verdict or readjust the status of the child, and this court is not disposed to revise his orders thereon, or to hold that he has in anywise abused his discretion in the case.

All of appellant’s assignments of error and his motion for rehearing are overruled, and the judgment is affirmed.

The foregoing opinion will be substituted for the original, which will be withdrawn.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL 12, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                      
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2010                                                                                                     
|                                                                                                                      
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                                                                                                      
|Dean L. Cash Chairman of
the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
p.1 

OAR Box 1490 

Prepped hy Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

28) IV-C-1 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/4/2008 11:51:46 AM Sheet 28 of 273 
P.2 

Keith Barnett 

/ 02/09/2001 02:02 PM 

To: jschwtzr@gte.net 

cc: 

Subject: Reinforced Plastic Compsites MACT 

Dear John: 

I was reviewing information on the CFA web site concerning the MACT for reinforced plastics. I 

noted that CFA states that VSR resins cannot be used to meet MACT. That is not correct. You 

can use VSR resins, but we are not going to be able to publish the draft test method in the 

proposed rule. I assume that because EPA is silent on the issue of how you determine the VSR test 

values shown in the point value equations, that the test method would be determined by the 

permitting authority on a case-by-case basis until we publish a test method. 

If a facility has to meet a case-by-case MACT prior to proposal, I assume that they could propose to 

use the CFA test method as currently written, if the permitting authority is agreeable. Once there is 

agreement on how to determine the VSR test value shown in the current point value equations, it is 

simply a matter of plugging in the value to the appropriate equation. 

Keith Barnett 

U. S. EPA 

Emission Standards Division 

M D- 13 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 

barnett.keith@epa.gov 

919-541-5605 

EPA AIR DOCKET
#### Ex parte NEWSOM.

No. 20314.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 8, 1939.

M. E. Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court of Walker County refusing to discharge the relator from confinement in the state penitentiary under a writ of habeas corpus.

The evidence adduced upon the hearing of the application in question is not before this court. No bills of exception have been presented complaining of any matter of procedure.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 31.2**

** **

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**

 

I, Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of GT Advanced Technologies Inc.;

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statements of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

 
| Date: June17, 2014                             |   |
|------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                           |   |
| /s/ KANWARDEV RAJA SINGH BAL                   |   |
| Kanwardev Raja Singh Bal                       |   |
| *Vice   President and Chief Financial Officer* |   |

 

----