alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
THE ATNBRNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

Honorable

Gee. H. Sheppard Comptroller

of Public Accounts Austin,

Texas Dear Sir Att'n: Mr. Cus Farrar Opinion

No. O-1109 Re: Whether or not the Comptroller is authorized

to approve countydepository

pledge contracts secured

by legally i8sued warrantsof municipalities. We are in receipt of your opinionrequestand quote from your letteras follows: "Article

297, as amended,leavesout, . . .I and the legally issued warrantsof any of said municipalities o named.' "This department

now has for approvalseveral depository

bonds securedby, ' and the legally issued warrantsof any of said municipalities

so named.' "Am I authorized

to approve such bonds?" Articlei547, section (c) ( as amended, Acts 1937, Forty-fifth Legislature, page 1298, chapter 484, section 1) reads *s follows: 'In lieu of such personal bonds or suretybonds as above specified, said banking corporation, association

or individual

banker so selectedas county depository, msy pledge and said depository bank is authorized

to pledge

with the Commissioners' Court for the purpose of securingsuch county funds, securities of the following kind, in an amount equal to the amount of such county funds on deposit in said depository bank, to-wit:

bonds and notes of the United States, securities of indebtedness

of the United States,and other evidences

of indebtedness

of the United States, when said evidences

of indebtedness

are supported

by the full faith and credit of the United States of America and other bonds or other evidences

of indebtedness

vhich sre guaranteed 8s to both principal and interest

by the United States Government; bonds of the State of Texas, or of any county,city, town, independent schooldistrict, common school district or bonds issuedunder the Fenders1 Farm Loan Act,or road district bonds, bonds, pledgesor other securities issuedEon. Oeo. H. Sheppard, page #2 (O-1109)

by the Board of Regeuts of the Univarsity of Texan,bank acceptances of banks having a capitalstoekofnotl.esa thanFiveHuudred Thousand

Dollarm ($5OO,OOO)j notes or bon& secured by mortgages insured

and debentures

irsued by the Bederal

HousingAdminiatretor of the mated states Gov ernment,

and bonda Issued

by municipal corporationa

in Texa8
. . ." The type of securities that my be pledged by county

depository

pledge contracts

are unmterated

in the rtetuteabove qwted. "Legelly iarued warrants of any of said munlcipalitiea so named' la not included in the amendedrtatute (Acts 1937,Forty-fifth Legislature,

pege 1298, chapter484, section1). It is the opinion

of this department that only the securities enumerated in Article 2547 may be pledged. Therefore, we feel thct countydepository pledge contracta,

including

legallyissued

warrantsof municipalities should not be approved by the Comptroller of Public Accounts. Trustingthat this answer8your question we remain. Very truly yours A’Il!OlUiEf

GNNNBALOF TEXAS3 a/ Cloud 0. Boothman

w Cloud 0. Boothmen

Asri8tant

APPROVED

AIJO. 11, 1939 o/ 0NRAl.D

c. M4NN ATTORNFZ GNNNRALOF TEXAS APPROVND

OPINIONCOMMITTEE BP R. U. B. CHAIRMAll
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 95-705 Date: April 20, 1995 

SUBJECT Benefits for Victims of the Oklahoma Bombing

The purpose of this letter is to give you a brief status report on the actions that OPM is taking to

assist and expedite the receipt of benefits to Federal employees and their families that were

affected by the bombing of the Federal building in Oklahoma City.

To assist us in getting information to the right people as quickly as possible, we would like you

to notify us immediately if your agency had employees in the Oklahoma City Federal building

who were killed, injured, or are missing. Please provide the names, telephone and fax numbers

of your agency contacts in Washington and Oklahoma that we should coordinate with. Please

fax the information to us at 202-606-1108. If the names of contacts are not yet available, notify

us now if you have employees affected and provide the contact information later. For contacts

in Oklahoma City, please provide name, telephone, and FAX numbers so that our representative

can contact them.

The Office of Workers Compensation has sent a team to Oklahoma City to assist survivors in

applying for FECA benefits. We assume most survivors would elect FECA benefits in lieu of

any survivor annuity payable under CSRS or FERS. The Retirement and Insurance Service also

is sending a representative to assist agencies in counseling employees and survivors. We will

provide expedited processing for claims. We also have established a hotline in our Retirement

Operations Center, Boyers, PA, to answer questions about filing for survivor and FEGLI benefits.

The number is 412-794-2005. 

Mary M. Sugar, Chief

Agency Services Division
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-10344

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOHN JOSEPH MIOTKE,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:97-CR-119-1

- - - - - - - - - -

December 9, 1998

Before DAVIS, DeMOSS, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

John Joseph Miotke appeals the district court’s application

of U.S.S.G. § 2B5.1(b)(2), to enhance his base offense level. 

Miotke contends that the enhancement does not apply to his case

because he produced the counterfeit currency by photocopying, and

Application Note 4 to § 2B5.1(b)(2), by its plain language,

precludes application of the enhancement to persons who merely

photocopy notes. Alternatively, Miotke contends that the 
No. 98-10344

-2-

commentary to the Sentencing Guideline is ambiguous and should be

interpreted in his favor.

We review “the district court’s application of the

Sentencing Guidelines de novo and its findings for clear error.” 

United States v. Wyjack, 141 F.3d 181, 183 (5th Cir. 1998)

(citation omitted). Miotke’s argument is foreclosed by the

interpretation of § 2B5.1(b)(2) and Application Note 4 advanced

in Wyjack, 141 F.3d at 183. There, we concluded that “the

enhancement contemplated by § 2B5.1(b)(2) applies to

counterfeiters who produce instruments by photocopying, unless

the instruments produced are so obviously counterfeit that they

are unlikely to be accepted after only minimal scrutiny.” Id.

The district court’s determination on the quality of

counterfeit notes, made by examination or based on witness’

testimony, in determining whether to apply the § 2B5.1(b)(2)

enhancement, is a factual finding, which is subject to the

clearly erroneous standard of review. United States v. Bollman,

141 F.3d 184, 186-87 (5th Cir. 1998). A finding is not clearly

erroneous “as long as the determination is plausible in light of

the record as a whole.” United States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380,

396 (5th Cir. 1996)(citation omitted), cert. denied, 117 S. Ct.

1712, 1858 (1997). 

The district court determined by examination and based on

credible testimony that the counterfeit instruments produced by

Miotke were not so obviously counterfeit that they were unlikely

to be accepted after only minimal scrutiny. Miotke has not shown
No. 98-10344

-3-

that the district court’s finding was clearly erroneous. 

Accordingly, Miotke’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

AFFIRMED.
# Official Journal L 330/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 330 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6127 December 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 330

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6127 December 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2018/1907 of 20 December 2018 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership | 1 |
| | | Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership | 3 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2018/1907 of 20 December 2018 on the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership

1

Agreement between the European Union and Japan for an Economic Partnership

3

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
### T E X A S C O U R T O F A P P E A L S , T H I R D D I S T R I C T , A T A U S T I N

NO. 03-13-00361- CV

EID Corporation, a Texas Corporat ion, an d Moham m ed S. Alhajeid, In divid ually, Ap pellants

v. The State of Texas; The City of FortWorth, Texas; The Transi t Authority of F ort Wor th, MTA Texas, et al., Appellees

F ROM TH E DISTRI CT COURT O F TRAVIS CO UNTY, 419 TH JUDICI AL DISTRICT NO. D-1 -GV-1 3-0 0016 9, H ONO RAB LE O RLINDA NARANJO , JUDGE P RESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

We w ill dismiss this appea l for want of prosec ution. Appellants EI D Corporation, 1

a Texas Corporation, and Mohammed S. Alhajeid, I ndividually , have not paid or made arr ang ements
to p a y f o r th e c le r k ’ s r e c o r d in th is a

p p e a l. B y le tt e r d a

te d A u g u s t 9 , 2 0 1 3 , th is Co u

r t’ s c le r k in f o r me d appellants that the cler

k’s rec ord was overdue

. The cler k reque sted that appellants’ attorney make

arr ang ements for t h e record and submit a status repor t on or befor e Aug ust 19, 2013. The cler k

wa rned that failure to comply could result in the dismiss al of this appea l for want of prose cu t i o n under Te x as Rule of Appe llate Proce dure 37.3( b).

We have rec eived n o cl er k s rec ord, no response from the appellants, and no other indication that the re cord is being prepa red. We dismiss this appea l for wa nt of prosec ution.

Appel l an t s p reviously attempted to file a motion to dismiss that was reje cted beca use it 1 did not comply

with the rules of pr ocedur e.J eff Rose, J ustice
Be fore J ustices Pury ear , Rose, and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Prosecution Filed: Aug ust 30, 2013

2
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
  (News Release)
    
    (Williams Logo)
 NYSE: WMB
 Date:
 Williams Pipeline Partners L.P. Files Registration Statement for Proposed IPO




---



##### 



About Williams (NYSE: WMB)  www.williams.com http://www.b2i.us/irpass.asp?BzID=630&to=ea&s=0
 Contact:
    
    Jeff Pounds
Williams (media relations)
(918) 573-3332 
Richard George
Williams (investor relations)
(918) 573-3679
  Portions of this document may constitute forward-looking statements as defined by federal
law. Although the company believes any such statements are based on reasonable assumptions, there
is no assurance that actual outcomes will not be materially different. Any such statements are made
in reliance on the safe harbor protections provided under the Private Securities Reform Act of
1995. Additional information about issues that could lead to material changes in performance is
contained in the companys annual reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Exhibit
35.1

SERVICER
COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

Barclays
Bank Delaware

BARCLAYS
DRYROCK ISSUANCE TRUST





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Barclays Dryrock
Issuance Trust for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer
of Barclays Bank Delaware (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:



1. A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under
the Amended and Restated Servicing Agreement dated as of August 1, 2012, as amended and restated as of December 17, 2013, by and
among Barclays Dryrock Funding LLC, the Servicer, Barclays Dryrock Issuance Trust and U.S. Bank National Association (the “Agreement”)
during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.



2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer
has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of
the Report.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Servicer
Compliance Statement this 17thof March 2015.



| |                       
| | ----------------------
| | BARCLAYS BANK DELAWARE
| |                       
| | By:                   
| | Name:                 
| | Title:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3101 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to review the list of veterans 

designated as former prisoners of war, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 16, 2015 

Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio (for himself, Mr. STIVERS, and Mr. TIBERI) introduced 

the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to review the 

list of veterans designated as former prisoners of war, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘POW Accountability 

5 Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REVIEW OF LISTS OF FORMER PRISONERS OF WAR. 

7 (a) REVIEW OF LISTS OF PRISONERS OF WAR.—The 

8 Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall review the VA POW 

9 list and the DOD POW list to identify any discrepancies 

10 in such lists. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3101 IH

1 (b) INSPECTOR GENERAL REVIEW OF PROCESS.— 

2 The Inspector General of the Department of Veterans Af3 fairs shall review the process by which the Secretary deter4 mines that a veteran is a former prisoner of war, including 

5 whether the Secretary is following guidelines established 

6 by the Secretary to determine that a veteran is a former 

7 prisoner of war. 

8 (c) REPORT.—Not later than 180 days after the date 

9 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans 

10 Affairs shall submit to Congress a report on the VA POW 

11 list, including the following: 

12 (1) Any discrepancies, by period of conflict, in 

13 the number of prisoners of war included on the VA 

14 POW list and the DOD POW list. 

15 (2) With respect to veterans included on the VA 

16 POW list who are not included on the DOD POW 

17 list, information regarding how such determinations 

18 were made, including what types of evidence were 

19 used, in a manner that does not personally identify 

20 such veterans. 

21 (3) The results of the review of the Inspector 

22 General under subsection (b), without change. 

23 (d) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

24 (1) The term ‘‘DOD POW list’’ means the list 

25 maintained by the Secretary of Defense, acting 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3101 IH

1 through the Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Per2 sonnel Office, of members of the Armed Forces who 

3 were prisoners of war. 

4 (2) The term ‘‘VA POW list’’ means the list 

5 maintained by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs of 

6 veterans whom the Secretary determines are former 

7 prisoners of war. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

# ACTION:

Correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        The National Science Foundation (NSF) published a document in the                         **Federal Register**                         of September 25, 2024, concerning a request for public comment on the Participatory Research and Indigenous Leadership in Research Evaluation. In the description of the Principles for Conducting Research in the Arctic, one principle was omitted.                    

## Corrections

                        In the                         **Federal Register**                         published September 25, 2024, in FR Doc. 2024-21973 (Filed 9-24-24), on page 78345, at the top of the second column, please include “Respect Indigenous knowledges” before “Effective Communication.”                    

All other details remain unchanged.

Dated: September 26, 2024.

Suzanne H. Plimpton,

Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.

[FR Doc. 2024-22503 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board

# AGENCY:

Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board has issued Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) 64 titled                         *Management's Discussion and Analysis: Rescinding and Replacing SFFAS 15.*

# ADDRESSES:

                        SFFAS 64 is available on the FASAB website at                         *http://www.fasab.gov/​accounting-standards/​.*                         Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-7350.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155, Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.

*Authority:*31 U.S.C. 3511(d); Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. 1001-1014.                    

Dated: September 27, 2024.

Monica R. Valentine,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2024-22633 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1610-02-P
#### Ex parte OSBORNE.

No. 17398.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 19, 1934.

See, also, 75 S.W.(2d) 265.

Goodhue Weatherly, of Falfurrias, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Habeas corpus proceeding to secure bail.

For a proper disposition of this case it seems only necessary to say that heretofore by the judgment of this court in an appeal from a habeas corpus proceeding, in which this appellant had sought to have his appeal bond reduced from what he claimed to be an excessive amount of $3,000, the amount of the bond for appeal in his case was reduced from $3,000 as fixed by the trial court, and was set by this court at $500. It is now made to appear that, after such order and judgment of this court, a bond for appeal was duly executed by appellant as principal and the Maryland Casualty Company as surety in the sum of $500; said bond appearing in all things to contain every requisite laid down by statute for such bond. It is further made to appear that neither the sheriff of said county, who has appellant in custody and has legal authority to approve said bond under the terms of article 830, C. C. P., nor the county judge of said county, who also has such authority, will approve said bond. No reason is advanced on the part of the state or the sheriff, who is the respondent herein, for such refusal. This court is given no information from this record as to any valid reason or excuse for such refusal. If appellant as a juvenile was adjudged to be such only as a result of unlawfully carrying a pistol, and that is absolutely all this court knows about this case from the record, the sum of $500i would be a reasonable amount for an appeal bond. The record further shows all things necessary to make clear that the Maryland Casualty Company is such company as is described in article 4969, Rev. Civ. Stats., that said company has complied with the laws of Texas,' and is authorized to make a bond such as the one here under consideration, and has so made and executed same, and that it has been tendered to the sheriff for his approval. In our opinion the sheriff should have approved said bond.

Following Ex parte Cook, 62 Tex. Cr. R. 22, 136 S. W. 67, the judgment of the trial court will be reversed, and the sheriff ordered to approve the bond which was tendered him, if tendered again.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of B2 Health, Inc., (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John Quam, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   ___/s/ John Quam__________ John Quam, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer  September 1, 2009