# Official Journal C 6/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.006.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 6 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 557 January 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2012.006.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 6

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 557 January 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Court of Justice of the European Union |
| 2012/C 006/01 | Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 370, 17.12.2011 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Court of Justice of the European Union

2012/C 006/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 370, 17.12.2011

Official Journal of the European Union

1

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | COURT PROCEEDINGS |
| | Court of Justice |
| 2012/C 006/02 | Case C-402/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 July 2011 by Jager & Polacek GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2011 in Case T-488/09 Jager & Polacek GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) | 2 |
| 2012/C 006/03 | Case C-478/11 P: Appeal lodged on 21 September 2011 by Laurent Gbagbo against the order delivered on 13 July 2011 by the General Court in Case T-348/11 Gbagbo v Council | 2 |
| 2012/C 006/04 | Case C-479/11 P: Appeal lodged on 21 September 2011 by Katinan Justin Koné against the order delivered on 13 July 2011 by the General Court in Case T-349/11 Koné v Council | 3 |
| 2012/C 006/05 | Case C-480/11 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2011 by Akissi Daniėle Boni-Claverie against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-350/11 Boni-Claverie v Council | 4 |
| 2012/C 006/06 | Case C-481/11 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2011 by Alcide Djédjé against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-351/11 Djédjé v Council | 5 |
| 2012/C 006/07 | Case C-482/11 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2011 by Affi Pascal N'Guessan against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-352/11 N'Guessan v Council | 6 |
| 2012/C 006/08 | Case C-525/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 17 October 2011 — SIA Mednis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests | 7 |
| 2012/C 006/09 | Case C-527/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāta Administratīvo lietu departaments (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 10 October 2011 — SIA Ablessio v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests | 8 |
| | General Court |
| 2012/C 006/10 | Case T-51/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Fardem Packaging v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Attenuating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure) | 9 |
| 2012/C 006/11 | Case T-54/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Kendrion v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Economic entity — Joint and several liability — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Fines — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Real ability to pay) | 9 |
| 2012/C 006/12 | Joined Cases T-55/06 and T-66/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — RKW and JM Gesellschaft für industrielle Beteiligungen v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Guidelines for the calculation of fines — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Implementation — Legality — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Single and continuous infringement — Attenuating circumstances — Exclusively passive role — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Imputability of unlawful conduct) | 9 |
| 2012/C 006/13 | Case T-59/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Low & Bonar and Bonar Technical Fabrics v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Attenuating circumstances — Passive role — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction) | 10 |
| 2012/C 006/14 | Case T-68/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Stempher and Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Limitation period — Proof of the infringement) | 10 |
| 2012/C 006/15 | Case T-72/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Groupe Gascogne v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Proportionality) | 11 |
| 2012/C 006/16 | Case T-76/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — ASPLA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Exchange of individualised information — Fixing of prices and sales quotas by geographic area — Allocation of customers — Concerted bidding in response to invitations to tender — Single and continuous infringement — Extent of the infringement — Definition of the product market and the geographic market — Guidelines for the calculation of fines — Principles of equal treatment and proportionality — Aggravating and attenuating circumstances — Ceiling of 10 % of turnover) | 11 |
| 2012/C 006/17 | Case T-78/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Álvarez v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Concept of undertaking — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Presumption of innocence) | 11 |
| 2012/C 006/18 | Case T-79/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Sachsa Verpackung v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing — Allocation of sales quotas by geographic area — Allocation of customers — Exchange of individualised information — Proof of the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Proportionality — Attenuating circumstances — Follow-my-leader role) | 12 |
| 2012/C 006/19 | Case T-308/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Buffalo Milke Automotive Polishing Products v OHIM — Werner & Mertz (BUFFALO MILKE Automotive Polishing Products) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BUFFALO MILKE Automotive Polishing Products — Earlier national figurative mark BÚFALO — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Discretion granted by Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)) | 12 |
| 2012/C 006/20 | Case T-484/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — McLoughney v OHIM — Kern (Powerball) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Powerball — Earlier unregistered word mark POWERBALL — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 13 |
| 2012/C 006/21 | Joined Cases T-170/10 and T-340/10: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2011 — CTG Luxembourg PSF v Court of Justice (Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Provision of support services to IT systems users — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid because it was lodged out of time — Award of contract to another tenderer — Action for annulment — Non-contractual liability) | 13 |
| 2012/C 006/22 | Case T-276/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — El Coto de Rioja v OHIM — Álvarez Serrano (COTO DE GOMARIZ) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative Community mark COTO DE GOMARIZ — Prior Community word marks COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 13 |
| 2012/C 006/23 | Case T-323/10: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou (CHABOU) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark CHABOU — Earlier national and international word marks Chalou — Refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 14 |
| 2012/C 006/24 | Case T-363/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Abbot Laboratories v OHIM (RESTORE) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark RESTORE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Infringement of the right to be heard — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009) | 14 |
| 2012/C 006/25 | Case T-434/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Hrbek v OHIM — Outdoor Group (ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT — Earlier Community figurative mark ‘alpine’ — Misuse of power — Article 65(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009) | 14 |
| 2012/C 006/26 | Case T-500/10: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Dorma v OHIM — Puertas Doorsa (doorsa FÁBRICA DE PUERTAS AUTOMÁTICAS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ‘doorsa FÁBRICA DE PUERTAS AUTOMÁTICAS’ — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks ‘DORMA’ — Lodging of additional documents on the reputation of the earlier marks in the procedure before the Board of Appeal — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) | 15 |
| 2012/C 006/27 | Case T-58/11: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Nolin v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Withdrawal of merit points and priority points following a promotion on the basis of Article 29 of the Staff Regulations — Legal basis — Competence of the author of the act — Principle of non-discrimination) | 15 |
| 2012/C 006/28 | Case T-25/10: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — BASF Schweiz and BASF Lampertheim v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Withdrawal of the decision — Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate) | 16 |
| 2012/C 006/29 | Case T-43/10: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — Elementis and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Markets for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Withdrawal of the decision — Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate) | 16 |
| 2012/C 006/30 | Case T-120/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — Refusal to amend the form of order sought — No need to adjudicate) | 16 |
| 2012/C 006/31 | Case T-449/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate) | 17 |
| 2012/C 006/32 | Case T-243/11: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE) (Community trade mark — Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person — Inadmissibility) | 17 |
| 2012/C 006/33 | Case T-544/11: Action brought on 12 October 2011 — Spectrum Brands (UK) v OHIM — Philips (STEAM GLIDE) | 17 |
| 2012/C 006/34 | Case T-548/11: Action brought on 19 October 2011 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- QUALITY) | 18 |
| 2012/C 006/35 | Case T-549/11: Action brought on 19 October 2011 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- BIO) | 19 |
| 2012/C 006/36 | Case T-552/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — Lito Maieftiko Ginaikologiko kai Khirourgiko Kentro v Commission | 19 |
| 2012/C 006/37 | Case T-553/11: Action brought on 14 October 2011 — European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB | 20 |
| 2012/C 006/38 | Case T-555/11: Action brought on 26 October 2011 — tesa v OHIM — Superquimica (tesa TACK) | 21 |
| 2012/C 006/39 | Case T-556/11: Action brought on 21 October 2011 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v OHIM | 21 |
| 2012/C 006/40 | Case T-561/11: Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Nycomed v OHIM — Bayer Consumer Care (ALEVIAN DUO) | 22 |
| 2012/C 006/41 | Case T-569/11: Action brought on 4 November 2011 — Gitana v OHIM — Rosenruist (GITANA) | 22 |
| 2012/C 006/42 | Case T-574/11: Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Unipol Banca v OHIM — Union Investment Privatfonds (unicard) | 23 |
| 2012/C 006/43 | Case T-579/11: Action brought on 11 November 2011 — Akhras v Council | 23 |
| 2012/C 006/44 | Case T-287/10: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — Unilever Espãna and Unilever v OHIM — Med Trans G. Poulias-S. Brakatselos (MED FRIGO S.A.) | 24 |
| | European Union Civil Service Tribunal |
| 2012/C 006/45 | Case F-101/11: Action brought on 10 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament | 25 |
| 2012/C 006/46 | Case F-103/11: Action brought on 11 October 2011 — ZZ v EIB | 25 |
| 2012/C 006/47 | Case F-105/11: Action brought on 17 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission | 26 |
| 2012/C 006/48 | Case F-109/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission | 26 |
| 2012/C 006/49 | Case F-110/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v Commission | 26 |
| 2012/C 006/50 | Case F-111/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v Commission | 27 |
| 2012/C 006/51 | Case F-112/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission | 27 |
| 2012/C 006/52 | Case F-114/11: Action brought on 26 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament | 27 |
| 2012/C 006/53 | Case F-115/11: Action brought on 27 October 2011 — ZZ v EIB | 28 |

V   Announcements

COURT PROCEEDINGS

Court of Justice

2012/C 006/02

Case C-402/11 P: Appeal brought on 28 July 2011 by Jager & Polacek GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2011 in Case T-488/09 Jager & Polacek GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Jager & Polacek GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

2

2012/C 006/03

Case C-478/11 P: Appeal lodged on 21 September 2011 by Laurent Gbagbo against the order delivered on 13 July 2011 by the General Court in Case T-348/11 Gbagbo v Council

Gbagbo v Council

2

2012/C 006/04

Case C-479/11 P: Appeal lodged on 21 September 2011 by Katinan Justin Koné against the order delivered on 13 July 2011 by the General Court in Case T-349/11 Koné v Council

3

2012/C 006/05

Case C-480/11 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2011 by Akissi Daniėle Boni-Claverie against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-350/11 Boni-Claverie v Council

Boni-Claverie v Council

4

2012/C 006/06

Case C-481/11 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2011 by Alcide Djédjé against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-351/11 Djédjé v Council

Djédjé v Council

5

2012/C 006/07

Case C-482/11 P: Appeal brought on 21 September 2011 by Affi Pascal N'Guessan against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 13 July 2011 in Case T-352/11 N'Guessan v Council

N'Guessan v Council

6

2012/C 006/08

Case C-525/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāts (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 17 October 2011 — SIA Mednis v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

7

2012/C 006/09

Case C-527/11: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākās tiesas Senāta Administratīvo lietu departaments (Republic of Latvia) lodged on 10 October 2011 — SIA Ablessio v Valsts ieņēmumu dienests

8

General Court

2012/C 006/10

Case T-51/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Fardem Packaging v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Attenuating circumstances — Cooperation during the administrative procedure)

9

2012/C 006/11

Case T-54/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Kendrion v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Economic entity — Joint and several liability — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Fines — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Real ability to pay)

9

2012/C 006/12

Joined Cases T-55/06 and T-66/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — RKW and JM Gesellschaft für industrielle Beteiligungen v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Guidelines for the calculation of fines — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Implementation — Legality — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Single and continuous infringement — Attenuating circumstances — Exclusively passive role — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Imputability of unlawful conduct)

9

2012/C 006/13

Case T-59/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Low & Bonar and Bonar Technical Fabrics v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Single and continuous infringement — Fines — Attenuating circumstances — Passive role — Proportionality — Equal treatment — Unlimited jurisdiction)

10

2012/C 006/14

Case T-68/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Stempher and Koninklijke Verpakkingsindustrie Stempher v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Fines — Limitation period — Proof of the infringement)

10

2012/C 006/15

Case T-72/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Groupe Gascogne v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Fines — Maximum limit of 10 % of turnover — Proportionality)

11

2012/C 006/16

Case T-76/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — ASPLA v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Exchange of individualised information — Fixing of prices and sales quotas by geographic area — Allocation of customers — Concerted bidding in response to invitations to tender — Single and continuous infringement — Extent of the infringement — Definition of the product market and the geographic market — Guidelines for the calculation of fines — Principles of equal treatment and proportionality — Aggravating and attenuating circumstances — Ceiling of 10 % of turnover)

11

2012/C 006/17

Case T-78/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Álvarez v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Concept of undertaking — Imputability of the unlawful conduct — Presumption of innocence)

11

2012/C 006/18

Case T-79/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Sachsa Verpackung v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Plastic industrial bags sector — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Price fixing — Allocation of sales quotas by geographic area — Allocation of customers — Exchange of individualised information — Proof of the infringement — Duration of the infringement — Fines — Gravity of the infringement — Proportionality — Attenuating circumstances — Follow-my-leader role)

12

2012/C 006/19

Case T-308/06: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Buffalo Milke Automotive Polishing Products v OHIM — Werner & Mertz (BUFFALO MILKE Automotive Polishing Products) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark BUFFALO MILKE Automotive Polishing Products — Earlier national figurative mark BÚFALO — Production of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Discretion granted by Article 74(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

12

2012/C 006/20

Case T-484/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — McLoughney v OHIM — Kern (Powerball) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark Powerball — Earlier unregistered word mark POWERBALL — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(3) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

13

2012/C 006/21

Joined Cases T-170/10 and T-340/10: Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2011 — CTG Luxembourg PSF v Court of Justice (Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Provision of support services to IT systems users — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid because it was lodged out of time — Award of contract to another tenderer — Action for annulment — Non-contractual liability)

13

2012/C 006/22

Case T-276/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — El Coto de Rioja v OHIM — Álvarez Serrano (COTO DE GOMARIZ) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Figurative Community mark COTO DE GOMARIZ — Prior Community word marks COTO DE IMAZ and EL COTO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

13

2012/C 006/23

Case T-323/10: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou (CHABOU) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark CHABOU — Earlier national and international word marks Chalou — Refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

14

2012/C 006/24

Case T-363/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Abbot Laboratories v OHIM (RESTORE) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark RESTORE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Infringement of the right to be heard — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

14

2012/C 006/25

Case T-434/10: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Hrbek v OHIM — Outdoor Group (ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ALPINE PRO SPORTSWEAR & EQUIPMENT — Earlier Community figurative mark ‘alpine’ — Misuse of power — Article 65(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009)

14

2012/C 006/26

Case T-500/10: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Dorma v OHIM — Puertas Doorsa (doorsa FÁBRICA DE PUERTAS AUTOMÁTICAS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark ‘doorsa FÁBRICA DE PUERTAS AUTOMÁTICAS’ — Earlier national and international word and figurative marks ‘DORMA’ — Lodging of additional documents on the reputation of the earlier marks in the procedure before the Board of Appeal — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

15

2012/C 006/27

Case T-58/11: Judgment of the General Court of 15 November 2011 — Nolin v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — Withdrawal of merit points and priority points following a promotion on the basis of Article 29 of the Staff Regulations — Legal basis — Competence of the author of the act — Principle of non-discrimination)

15

2012/C 006/28

Case T-25/10: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — BASF Schweiz and BASF Lampertheim v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Withdrawal of the decision — Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

16

2012/C 006/29

Case T-43/10: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — Elementis and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Markets for tin stabilisers and ESBO/esters heat stabilisers — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement — Withdrawal of the decision — Disappearance of the subject-matter of the proceedings — No need to adjudicate)

16

2012/C 006/30

Case T-120/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — Refusal to amend the form of order sought — No need to adjudicate)

16

2012/C 006/31

Case T-449/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)

17

2012/C 006/32

Case T-243/11: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — Glaxo Group v OHIM — Farmodiética (ADVANCE) (Community trade mark — Applicant represented by a lawyer who is a not a third person — Inadmissibility)

17

2012/C 006/33

Case T-544/11: Action brought on 12 October 2011 — Spectrum Brands (UK) v OHIM — Philips (STEAM GLIDE)

17

2012/C 006/34

Case T-548/11: Action brought on 19 October 2011 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- QUALITY)

18

2012/C 006/35

Case T-549/11: Action brought on 19 October 2011 — MIP Metro v OHIM — Real Seguros (real,- BIO)

19

2012/C 006/36

Case T-552/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — Lito Maieftiko Ginaikologiko kai Khirourgiko Kentro v Commission

19

2012/C 006/37

Case T-553/11: Action brought on 14 October 2011 — European Dynamics Luxembourg v ECB

20

2012/C 006/38

Case T-555/11: Action brought on 26 October 2011 — tesa v OHIM — Superquimica (tesa TACK)

21

2012/C 006/39

Case T-556/11: Action brought on 21 October 2011 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Others v OHIM

21

2012/C 006/40

Case T-561/11: Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Nycomed v OHIM — Bayer Consumer Care (ALEVIAN DUO)

22

2012/C 006/41

Case T-569/11: Action brought on 4 November 2011 — Gitana v OHIM — Rosenruist (GITANA)

22

2012/C 006/42

Case T-574/11: Action brought on 31 October 2011 — Unipol Banca v OHIM — Union Investment Privatfonds (unicard)

23

2012/C 006/43

Case T-579/11: Action brought on 11 November 2011 — Akhras v Council

23

2012/C 006/44

Case T-287/10: Order of the General Court of 8 November 2011 — Unilever Espãna and Unilever v OHIM — Med Trans G. Poulias-S. Brakatselos (MED FRIGO S.A.)

24

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2012/C 006/45

Case F-101/11: Action brought on 10 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament

25

2012/C 006/46

Case F-103/11: Action brought on 11 October 2011 — ZZ v EIB

25

2012/C 006/47

Case F-105/11: Action brought on 17 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission

26

2012/C 006/48

Case F-109/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission

26

2012/C 006/49

Case F-110/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v Commission

26

2012/C 006/50

Case F-111/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ and Others v Commission

27

2012/C 006/51

Case F-112/11: Action brought on 24 October 2011 — ZZ v Commission

27

2012/C 006/52

Case F-114/11: Action brought on 26 October 2011 — ZZ v Parliament

27

2012/C 006/53

Case F-115/11: Action brought on 27 October 2011 — ZZ v EIB

28

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN