alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NO. 07-12-0350-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL D AUGUST 8, 2012

__________________ ____________ TERRY ALLEN REECE, Appellant

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________ _______________ FROM THE 69th DISTRICT COURT OF MOORE COUNTY; NO. 4419; HON. RO N ENNS, PRESIDING

__________________ _____________ Order of Dismissal

__________________ _____________ Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Terry Allen Reece, appellant, attempts to appeal from his conviction for obstruction or retaliation. The trial court pronounced sent ence and signed the judg ment in August of 2011. Appellant did not file his notice of appeal until August 3, 2012. We dismiss for want of jurisdiction. To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within ni nety days after that date if a motion for2 new trial is filed. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 26.2(a). Therefore, t he deadline for perfecting an appeal here lapsed in September of 2011. A timely filed notice of appeal is essentia l to invoke our appellate jurisdiction. Olivo v. State , 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim . App. 1996). If it is untimely, we can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding. Id. at 523. Appella nt's notice being untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction over the matter and dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, appellant’s appeal is dismissed. 1

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

1 The appropriate vehicle for seeking a belated appeal from a final felony conviction is by writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See T EX

. C ODE C RIM

. P ROC

. A NN . art. 11.07 (Vernon 2005).
# Official Journal C 67A/23 M

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 67A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5023 March 2007 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 67A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5023 March 2007

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Commission |
| 2007/C 067A/01 | Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General — Publication of a vacancy for a Principal Adviser function (grade AD14) — Public health and risk assessment — Luxembourg — (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2007/10045 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Commission

2007/C 067A/01

Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General — Publication of a vacancy for a Principal Adviser function (grade AD14) — Public health and risk assessment — Luxembourg — (Article 29(2) of the Staff Regulations) — COM/2007/10045

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
# Official Journal C 294A/18 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 294A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5118 November 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 294A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5118 November 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | CommissionDG Information Society and Media |
| 2008/C 294A/01 | Vacancy for an Executive Director (grade AD 14) of the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA), Heraklion — COM/2008/10132 | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

CommissionDG Information Society and Media

2008/C 294A/01

Vacancy for an Executive Director (grade AD 14) of the European Network and Information Security Agency (ENISA), Heraklion — COM/2008/10132

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 16, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 341 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-687, CP2024-696.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22612 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
### F I LE D U. S . COURT OF AP PE ALS E LEVE NTH CI RCUI T Se pt e m be r 28, 2005 T HOM AS K. KAHN C L E RK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H]
I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 04- 15539

________________________ D. C. Do c k e tNo
. 0 4
- 2 2 5 7 2
- CV- J LK E M M A Y A I Z A D I A Z , E B O N Y R O B E R T S , A N D R E N E A L B E M B R Y , A F L
- C I O , A m e r i c a n F e de r a t i on of L abora nd C o n g r e s s o f

I n du s tr ia l O r g an iz a tio n s , A M E R I C A N F O U N D A T I O N , of S t a t e C ountya nd M u n ic ip a l E m p lo y e e s , A F L
- C I O , F L O R I D A P U B L I C E M P L O Y E E S C O U N C I L 7 9 , A F S C M E , A F L
- C I O , S E R V I C E E M P L O Y E E S I N T E RN A T I O N A L U N I O N , A F L
- C I O , P la in tif f s - A p p e llan ts , v ersu s S E C R E T A R Y O F T H E S T A T E O F F L O R I D A , G le n d aH o o d , B R O W A R D C O U N T Y S U P E R V I S O R O F E L E C T I O N S , B r e n d aS n ip e s , D U V A L C O U N T Y , S up e rv is o ro f

E le c tio n s , J e rryH o llan d , M I A M I D A D E C O U N T Y , S up e rv is o ro f

E le c tio n s , C o n s tan c e K ap lan , O R A N G E C O U N T Y , S up e rv is o ro f

E le c tio n s , B ill C o w le s , e t a l., D e f e n d a n ts - A p p e lle e s .Honora

ble Richard Mills, United States District Judg e for the Central District of

Illinois , sitti ng * by designation. 2 ________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe S outhe rn D i s tr i c tof F l or i da

_________________________ ( S e p t e m b e r 28, 2005) B ef ore T JO F L A T and B A R K E T T , C i rc ui tJudg es , and M IL L S , D i stri ctJudg e. * P E R C U R I A M: I n thi s c a s e , the di s tr i c tc ourtdi s m i s s e d A ppe l l a nt s ’ C om pl a i nton the g r o u n d s th a t A p p e llan ts la c k e ds tan d in g to s u e . T h e d is tr ic t c o u rt e rr e din th is
c o n c lu s io n . H o w e v e r , th e p a rtie s h a v e n o te dth a t th e F lo r id alaw p e rta in in g to vot e rr e gi s tr a t i on r e l e va ntt o thi s c a s e ha s be e n a m e nde d dur i ng the pe nde nc yof th i s ap p e a l
. Th e d i s tr i c tc o u rtj u d g me n ti s VA CATE D a n dth e c a s e RE M AN DED f o rf u rth e rp r o c e e d in g s in c lu d in g th e f ilin g o f a n a m e n d e dc o m p la in t, ta k in g in to
a c c o u n t th e law a s it p r e s e n tlye x is ts .
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3024 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3024

  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit review of 
  certain Medicare payment determinations for disproportionate share 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 10, 2015

Mr. Boustany (for himself and Mr. Lewis) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit review of 
  certain Medicare payment determinations for disproportionate share 
                   hospitals, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REVIEW OF MEDICARE PAYMENT DETERMINATIONS FOR 
              DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOSPITALS.

    (a) In General.--Section 1886(r) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 1395ww(r)) is amended by striking paragraph (3).
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply with respect to any claim relating to a determination made under 
paragraph (2) of such section 1886(r) that is pending on a date that is 
on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IB 

Union Calendar No. 497 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2966 

[Report No. 114–645] 

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty by increasing 

employment entry, retention, and advancement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri (for himself and Mrs. NOEM) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

JUNE 28, 2016 

Additional sponsor: Mr. REED

JUNE 28, 2016 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Committee of the Whole 

House on the State of the Union, and ordered to be printed 

[Strike out all after the enacting clause and insert the part printed in italic] 

[For text of introduced bill, see copy of bill as introduced on July 8, 2015] 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2966 RH

A BILL 

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty 

by increasing employment entry, retention, and advancement. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2966 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Poverty 

5 through Employment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES OF THE TANF PROGRAM TO INCLUDE RE7 DUCING POVERTY THROUGH WORK. 

8 Section 401(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 601(a)) is amended— 

10 (1) by striking ‘‘and’’ at the end of paragraph 

11 (3); 

12 (2) by striking the period at the end of para13 graph (4) and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(5) reduce child poverty by increasing employ16 ment entry, retention, and advancement of needy par17 ents.’’. 

18 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

19 The amendments made by this Act shall take effect on 

20 October 1, 2016. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 497 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2966 

[Report No. 114–645] 

A BILL 

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reductention, and advancement. ing poverty by increasing employment entry, reJUNE 28, 2016 

Reported with an amendment, committed to the Comand ordered to be printed mittee of the Whole House on the State of the Union, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

                                                                     EXHIBIT 23



                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8, file number 333-03361 of Prime Hospitality Corp. pertaining to the
1995 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Non-employee Director Stock Option
Plan; Form S-8, file number 333-44287 pertaining to the Prime Hospitality Corp.
1995 Employee Stock Option Plan and the 1995 Non-employee Director Stock Option
Plan; and Form S-8, file number 333-60911, pertaining to the Prime Hospitality
Corp. 1995 Employee Stock Option Plan) of Prime Hospitality Corp. of our report
dated February 11, 2003, except for note 21, as of which the date is March 26,
2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Prime Hospitality
Corp. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2002.


/s/ Ernst & Young LLP


New York, New York
March 27, 2003
## NUMBER 13 - 2 4 - 00 360 - C R COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI

– EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ TRAVIS SCOTT KIPFER , A ppellant ,
v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, A ppellee

.

____________________________________________________________

ON A PPEAL FROM THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT OF SAN PATRICIO COUNTY, TEXAS

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justice Benavides, Longoria, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides Appellant Travis Scott Kipfer filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal a judgment of conviction in trial court cause number S

- 23

- 3231CR

. The trial court’s
certification of the defendant ’ s right to appeal shows that the case was a plea

- bargain case, and appellant has no right to appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 25.2(a)(2).2

On July 18 , 202 4 , we ordered appellant ’ s counsel to review the record and determine whether appellant has the right to appeal. On July 31 , 2024 , appellant ’ s counsel filed a response indicat ing the judg ment was entered after a plea

- bargain ; she
further co ncluded that the appellant does not otherwise have the right to appeal

. The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed
if the trial court ’ s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal

. I d

. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed

.
GINA M. BENAVIDES Justice Do not publish. T EX . R. A PP . P. 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed on the 29th day of August , 202 4

.
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)









In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Mines, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Leitzman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Registrant

Date: May 17, 2010

United Mines, Inc.

By: /s/ Robert LeitzmanRobert LeitzmanChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer,)
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



The certification
set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de
C.V. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code. Hector Grisi Checa, the Executive President and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Financiero Santander
México, S.A.B. de C.V., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: May 2, 2016



|/s/ Hector Grisi Checa
|----------------------
|Name:                 
|Title:
---

Exhibit: 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aom Minerals Ltd.,(the
  "Company") on 10Q SB for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities
  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brennan Wood
  , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.
  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

Date: July 14, 2007.

/s/ Brennan
Wood Brennan Wood

Chief Financial Officer

  (Title)

---
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 5, 2018

No. 04-18-00511-CV

XPO LOGISTICS FREIGHT, LLC,

Appellant

v.

Ralph HERNANDEZ,

Appellee

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017-CI-21366

Honorable Renée Yanta, Judge Presiding

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, this appeal is 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is ORDERED that all pending motions are 

DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Appellee Ralph 

Hernandez recover all costs on appeal from Appellant XPO Logistics Freight, LLC.

It is so ORDERED on September 5, 2018.

_____________________________

Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 5th day of September, 2018.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle, Clerk of Court
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Energy Transfer Partners Raises 2007 Guidance
Investment Strengthens 2008 and 2009 Outlook
Changes Fiscal Year-End to December
 Energy Transfer Partners, L.P.




---



##### 



EBITDA Discussion




---



##### 



Energy Transfer Partners, L.P. ( )




---



##### 



Energy Transfer Equity, L.P. ( NYSE:ETE )
 www.energytransfer.com
 Contacts  Investor Relations:
 Media Relations:
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the
quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunrise Holdings Limited (the "Company") for
the quarter ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The
information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Holdings
Limited.







Date:
      July 24, 2009
            
            
            /s/
      Shaojun SunShaojun Sun, Chief Financial
Officer
AIR-09-248-E August 25, 2010

Exemption No. 10122 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2009-0442

Mr. Greg W. Gremminger Magni Gyro srl and Magni USA LLC

17225 Pleasant View Drive Ste. Genevieve, MO 63670

Dear Mr. Gremminger:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated May 5, 2009, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Adm inistration (FAA) on behalf of Magni Gyro srl and Magni USA LLC (Magni Gyro) for an exemption from §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193 (e)(1) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). The proposed exemption, if granted, would allow Magni Gyro to produce and sell gyroplanes for certification under § 21.191(i) without previous ly having m anufactured and assembled a gyroplane of the same make and model that has been issued a special airworthiness certificated in the light-sport category under § 21.190

.

The FAA has determ ined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Magni Gyro.

The FAA recently issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 10099 (copy enclosed), the FAA did not believe it is in the public interest to permit a manufacturer to sell a make and model of gyroplane (or aircraft kit), eligible for the issuance of an experimental certificate in the light-sport category, if that manufacturer has not yet produced a gyroplane of that make and model that meets the accepted consensus standards. Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—2

 they don’t differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed denial of exemption;

 the reasons stated by the FAA for denying the enclosed exemption also apply to the situation you present; and

 a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Adm inistrator has delegated to me, I hereby deny your petition Magni Gyro srl and Magni USA LLC for an exemption from 14 CFR §§ 21.191(i)(3) and 21.193(e)(1).

Sincerely,

/s/

K.C. Yanamura Acting Director, Aircraft Certification Service

Enclosure