alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# ORIGINAL
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA PR 06-0544
IN RE PETITION OF ROBERT C. GRIFFIN FOR REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE BAR OF MONTANA ORDER

Robert C. Griffin haspetitioned for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar of Montana. Griffin was placed on inactive status by the State Bar ofMontana pursuant to Rules 3B2, 5, and 12 ofthe Rules for Continuing Legal Education (CLE) on July 1, 2024, as a result ofnoncompliance with CLE requirements. In accordance with Rule 13 ofthe CLE Rules, Griffin has provided a letter from the State Bar certifying that Griffm has now completed all CLE requirements "through the reporting year that ended March 31, 2024." The Petition indicates Griffin is actively practicing law in North Dakota and has been sinceMay 8, 2013. Petitioner is orhas notbeen: 1)suspended, disbarred, or otherwise ineligible to practice of law in another jurisdiction and is not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings' or pending disciplinary proceedings in another jurisdiction, 2) charged with a criminal offense, 3) accrued delinquent debt or filed for bankruptcy, 4) failed to fulfill the obligations ofapublic office orprofessional license, or 5) committed any violations ofthe Rules ofProfessional Conduct while on inactive status. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition ofRobert C. Griffin for reinstatement to active status in the State Bar ofMontana is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. ILin— DATED this ka-.1

— day ofAugust, 2024. 

# FLED AUG -6 2024 Bowen Greenwooa Clerk of Suprerne Court State of Montana ChiefJustice 08/06/2024

Case Number: PR 06-0544

# tderi-4%.

2
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Each of
the undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of RINO
International Corporation (the "Company"), for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of his knowledge:




(1)
            The
      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
      September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




Dated:
May 15, 2009





/s/ Zou
      DejunZou
      DejunChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Qiu JianpingQiu JianpingChief
      Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
RINO International Corporation and will be retained by RINO International
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a                               ( print page 80274)                            domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 393 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-751, K2024-44.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22700 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
BEFORE THE 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

WASHINGTON, D.C. 

Essential Air Service at 

KINGMAN, ARIZONA 

PAGE, ARIZONA 

PRESCOTT, ARIZONA 

SHOW LOW, ARIZONA 

Under 49 U.S.C. §41731 et seq. 

) 

) 

) 

) Docket OST-1996-1899 

) Docket OST-1997-2694 

) Docket OST-1996-1899 

) Docket OST -1998-4409 

) 

) 

REQUEST FOR SUBMISSION DEADLINE EXTENTION 

BY MOKULELE FLIGHT SERVICE INC. 

Correspondence with regard to this document should be addressed to: 

Ron Hansen 

CEO 

Mokulele Flight Service Inc. 

73-350 U'u Street 

Kailua-Kana, HI 96740 

Telephone: 808-840-9002 

Fax:808-326-1266 

Email: ron.hansen@mokulelehawaii.com 

Mokulele Flight Service Inc. respectfully requests a four week extension of the submission 

deadline date ofDecember 22, 2014 as set by the Department of Transportation in its' 

solicitation of carrier proposals in the above mentioned cities to on or about January 20, 2014 (as 

Monday January 19 is a Federal holiday). Mokulele requests the additional time to complete its 

necessary due diligence on these markets and complete negotiations with potential codeshare 

partners and aircraft manufacturers. 

Submitted: December 19, 2014 

Ron Hansen 

CEO 

Mokulele Flight Service Inc.
EXHIBIT 32.01





CERTIFICATIONS OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I, Wu Qiyou, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.





By:
/s/ WU QIYOUDate: August 15, 2011
Name:
Wu QiyouTitle:
Chief Executive Officer





I, David Dodge, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Anhui Taiyang Poultry Co., Inc.





By:
/s/ DAVID DODGEDate: August 15, 2011
Name:
David DodgeTitle:
Chief Financial Officer
Raw materials Reaction Separation Finishing Product

Recycle stream
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2


November 2, 2017




Carvana, LLC
Attn:  Kevin Hogan, Corporate Counsel
1930 West Rio Salado Parkway
Tempe, Arizona 85281




Dear Mr. Hogan:


		
	Re:
	Notice of Change in Release Period for Certain Vehicles




Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Inventory Financing and Security Agreement, dated July 27, 2015 (as amended, the “IFSA”), Carvana, LLC must make payment to the Ally Parties within five business days of the date a vehicle is sold.  The IFSA also provides that the Ally Parties may, in their sole discretion, permit more time to take into account factors such as delays in the administration, processing and delivery of payments (the “Release Period,” as defined in the IFSA).  The IFSA further provides that the existence, duration, terms, and continuation of the Release Period are subject to change from time to time by the Ally Parties, and a change in the Release Period does not constitute an amendment of the IFSA.


Consistent with the foregoing, the Ally Parties hereby provide notice that:


		
	1.
	With respect to vehicles sold by Carvana pursuant to a retail installment contract that becomes subject to the so-called “Flow Purchase” or “Warehouse Financing” credit facilities between the Ally Parties and Carvana and/or its affiliates, Carvana may make payment to the Ally Parties (under IFSA Section III.C.2(a)) on or before the earlier of:  one business day after the Ally Parties fund Carvana (or its affiliate) under the Part A or Part B facility, or 15 business days after the date of sale (unchanged from February 10, 2017 letter agreement); and




		
	2.
	With respect to vehicles sold by Carvana pursuant to a retail installment contract, other than as described above in Paragraph 1, Carvana may make payment to the Ally Parties (under IFSA Section III.C.2(a)) on or before the earlier of:  two business days after Carvana (or its affiliate) is funded, or 15 business days after the date of sale.




		
	3.
	In all other circumstances, Carvana may make payment to the Ally Parties (under IFSA Section III.C.2(a)) on or before five business days after the date of sale.




The Ally Parties reserve the right to adjust, increase or decrease these periods in the future, in their discretion.

















Please execute this letter below and return a copy to me to acknowledge Carvana’s receipt and understanding of this notice.
	
					
	 
	 
	 
	ALLY BANK

	 
	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Stephen Gambrel

	 
	 
	 
	Name:
	Stephen Gambrel

	 
	 
	 
	Title:
	Authorized Representative

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	ALLY FINANCIAL

	 
	 
	 
	By:
	/s/ Stephen Gambrel

	 
	 
	 
	Name:
	Stephen Gambrel

	 
	 
	 
	Title:
	Authorized Representative

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Acknowledged:
	 
	 
	 

	 
	 
	 
	 
	 

	Carvana, LLC
	 
	 
	 

	By:
	/s/ Paul Breaux
	 
	 
	 

	Name:
	Paul Breaux
	 
	 
	 

	Title:
	Vice President
EXHIBIT 32




18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Ironwood Gold Corp. (the “Company”) on
Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), each of the undersigned
officers, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge:




(1)         
the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)         
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




Date:  July
13, 2010




/s/ Behzad ShayanfarBehzad
      ShayanfarChief
      Executive Officer/s/ Robert J. ReuklRobert
      J. ReuklPresident
      and Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3318 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3318

   To require the Secretary of the Treasury to modify regulations to 
    increase the amount of the de minimis safe harbor election for 
   exemption from capital expenditures for taxpayers without certain 
                         financial statements.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 29, 2015

 Mr. Blum (for himself and Mr. Cramer) introduced the following bill; 
         which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To require the Secretary of the Treasury to modify regulations to 
    increase the amount of the de minimis safe harbor election for 
   exemption from capital expenditures for taxpayers without certain 
                         financial statements.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reducing Tax Preparation Burdens for 
American Investments and Repairs Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE IN DE MINIMIS SAFE HARBOR ELECTION FOR EXEMPTIONS FROM 
              CAPITAL EXPENDITURES FOR TAXPAYERS WITHOUT CERTAIN 
              FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Treasury shall modify 
Treasury Regulation section 1.263(a)-1(f) (26 C.F.R. 1.263(a)-1(f)) to 
increase the $500 de minimis rule for taxpayers without applicable 
financial statements to $2,500.
    (b) Effective Date.--The revised regulations under this section 
shall apply to amounts paid or incurred in taxable years beginning 
after December 31, 2015.
                                 <all>
```
#### GILLEY v. MERCHANTS COLD STORAGE CO.

No. 13668.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Feb. 11, 1938.

Houtchens & Houtchens and J. Harold Craik, all of Fort Worth, for appellant.

L. J. Wardlaw and A. L. Wardlaw, both of Fort Worth, for appellee.

BROWN, Justice.

Appellant brought suit against appellee, a corporation, engaged in the cold storage business, to recover damages for alleged negligent handling of a quantity of Irish potatoes that appellant had stored with appellee during the month of June, 1934. The case was tried to a jury, and at the close of the taking of evidence, the trial court gave the jury , a peremptory instruction to find for the defendant; and the verdict being returned, the court rendered judgment that the plaintiff take nothing. The appeal is from such proceeding.

There are several reasons why the trial court committed no error in instructing a verdict for the defendant below, and appellee here.

In the first place, the evidence brought out the fact that a portion of the potatoes in question belonged to appellant’s sons. The testimony did not show what portion of or particular potatoes belonged to appellant; and it was not shown that appellant’s sons had ever assigned the asserted cause of action to appellant.

In the second place, the evidence did not raise the issue of the market value of the potatoes at the time of the injury, had they been in good condition, and the market value after injury. It was shown that some of the potatoes were in marketable condition, after the alleged injury, but neither the quantity nor the market price was shown.

In the third place, no effort was made to show for what length of time the potatoes were to be stored.

It is quite evident that appellant wanted to store the potatoes for some time, and the presumption is, for a rise in the market price, but we and the trial court are left without a guidepost.

The trial court concluded that the evidence adduced by the plaintiff below was *284not sufficient to raise an issue of fact for determination by the jury, and we believe the trial court correctly held.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc. a Delaware
corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending
September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Report”), I, David Villarreal, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to my knowledge:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




/s/David
      VillarrealDavid
      VillarrealChief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial OfficerDate:  November
      16, 2009
Exhibit








EXHIBIT 10.2




[NAME] - Equity Award Notification


[DATE] Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit (PRSU) Award
Target Grant Value: $[_____]
Number of Shares: Based on [DATE]
	
		
	Award Type
	Number of Shares

	PRSUs
	[_____]






Note: The terms of the [DATE] Annual Equity Award are in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Ralph Lauren Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan as well as with the terms and conditions of executive’s employment agreement date [DATE]. These awards are contingent upon signing the PRSU Equity Agreement which will be presented for execution on [DATE].


Information concerning goals is strictly confidential


PRSUs:


		
	•
	Vest over three-year period in one-third increments beginning FY19 if the FY18 performance goal (Operating Margin of [__]%) is achieved and certified by the Compensation and Organizational Development Committee, and employment is continuous through each vesting date (unless otherwise provided for in the employment agreement).








1
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 18, 2022

No. 04-20-00146-CV

THE MOST REVEREND WM. MICHAEL MULVEY, S.T.L., D.D. BISHOP OF 

CORPUS CHRISTI,

Appellant / Cross-Appellee

v.

BAY, LTD., 

Appellee / Cross-Appellant

From the 79th Judicial District Court, Jim Wells County, Texas

Trial Court No. 12-09-51494-CV

Honorable Richard C. Terrell, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice 

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice 

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice 

Irene Rios, Justice 

Beth Watkins, Justice 

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice 

Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice 

On September 29, 2021, appellee/cross-appellant filed a “Motion for Rehearing and for 

Reconsideration En Banc.” After consideration, the motion is DENIED.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of January, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
# Official Journal L 231/8 Se

| | ISSN 1725-2555 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 231 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 488 September 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2555

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 231

English edition

Legislation

Volume 488 September 2005

---

| Contents | | I   Acts whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | * | Council Regulation (EC) No 1454/2005 of 2 September 2005 amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan | 1 |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1455/2005 of 7 September 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 7 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 1456/2005 of 6 September 2005 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods | 9 |

Contents

I   Acts whose publication is obligatory

page

*

Council Regulation (EC) No 1454/2005 of 2 September 2005 amending the Annex to Regulation (EC) No 2042/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan

1

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1455/2005 of 7 September 2005 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

7

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 1456/2005 of 6 September 2005 establishing unit values for the determination of the customs value of certain perishable goods

9

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
#### HARRIS v. STATE.

No. 19264.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 5, 1938.

Dave Weinstein and Walter Kolleschnig, both of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Robbery is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of fifteen years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.