alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302(a) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Limco-Piedmont Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
     5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and to
the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):
    /s/ Shaul Menachem*Chief Executive Officer
 
 *
    
    The originally executed copy of this Certification will be maintained at the Registrants
offices and will be made available for inspection upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3, 2010,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce L. Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gregory W. Hunt    
|Gregory W. Hunt        
|Chief Financial Officer
|May 13, 2010           



36
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
 THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT Amendment Effective Date SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC. Borrower JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. Agent
 WHEREAS First Amendment Credit Agreement
 WHEREAS
 NOW, THEREFORE
 ARTICLE I  Definitions
 Section 1.01 Definitions .
 ARTICLE II  Amendments
 Section 2.01 Amendment to Section 2.05(c) Section 2.05(c)
 Overadvances provided




---



##### 



provided Permitted Overadvance Period provided, further
 Section 2.02 Amendment to Section 6.17(a) Section 6.17(a
 Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio provided however
 ARTICLE III  Conditions Precedent
 Section 3.01 Conditions Effective Date
    2




---



##### 



Section 3.02 Modified
 ARTICLE IV  No Waiver
 Section 4.01 No Waiver . Other Agreements
 ARTICLE V  Ratifications, Representations and Warranties
 Section 5.01 Ratifications
 3




---



##### 



Section 5.02 Representations and Warranties
 ARTICLE VI  Miscellaneous
 Section 6.01 Survival of Representations and Warranties
 Section 6.02 Reference to Credit Agreement; Obligations
 4




---



##### 



Section 6.03 Expenses
 Section 6.04 Severability
 Section 6.05 APPLICABLE LAW . EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY PROVIDED IN ANY OF THE
LOAN DOCUMENTS, IN ALL RESPECTS, INCLUDING ALL MATTERS OF CONSTRUCTION, VALIDITY AND PERFORMANCE,
THIS AMENDMENT AND THE OBLIGATIONS ARISING HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED, AND
ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL LAWS (WITHOUT REGARD TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PROVISIONS)
OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, BUT GIVING EFFECT TO FEDERAL LAWS APPLICABLE TO NATIONAL BANKS.
 Section 6.06 Successors and Assigns
 Section 6.07 Counterparts
 Section 6.08 Headings
 Section 6.09 Release
 5




---



##### 



Section 6.10 NO ORAL AGREEMENTS
 [Remainder of Page Intentionally Left Blank; Signature Pages Follow.]
 6




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF
 BORROWER:
SUPERIOR OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:
    /s/ Roger D. BurksName:
    Roger D. BurksTitle:
    Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



AGENT:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Individually, as Administrative Agent and LenderBy:
    /s/ Christy WestName:
    Christy WestTitle:
    Vice President
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16**  **- 6049** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. LACEY LEROY MCCLAM, JR. , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Florence
. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 01277

- TLW

- 1; 4:15

- cv - 04936

- TLW )

Submitted : March 29, 2016 Decided: April 1, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNC AN , Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Lacey Leroy McClam, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Lacey Leroy McClam, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order s dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion as successive and denying reconsideration . The order s are no t appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 225 3(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the m otion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that McClam has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabilit y and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date: August 5, 2010 | /s/Kenneth R. Burk                                   |
|----------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Kenneth R. Burk                                      |
|                 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
2004 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit
5-17-2004 

# I n Re: D on ald S hor t P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 03-2337

F o l lo w thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2004 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sit y S choo l of L a

w Di g it al Re posit or y

. F or mor e infor m at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j a min . C a rl s on@l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion
" I n Re: D on ald S hor t " (2004). 2004 D e cisio n s . P ape r 700. h tt p://d i g it alc ommon s .l a

w . v i l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2004/7001 NOT PRE CEDENT IAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FO R T HE TH IRD CIR CU IT
No. 03-2337
IN RE: DONALD SHORT, S R., DEBTOR, Appellant v. M AR Y M . SH OR T, Appellee

____________ APPEAL FROM THE UNI TED STATES DIST RICT COURT FO R T HE WE STE RN DIST RIC T O F PE NN SY LV AN IA

(D.C. C iv. No. 03-c v-0028 2) Distri ct Judge: Honorable Arthur J. Schwab
Submitte d Under Third Circ uit L. A.R. 34.1( a)

May 11, 2004 Be for e: N YG AA RD , M cK EE , and W EIS , Circu it Judges
.

(Fil ed: May 17, 2004)

____________ OPI NION
W EIS , Circuit

Judge
. The ap pe ll an t i s the de bt orinpos se ss io n i n a Chapt er13 p ro ce ed in g. He
see ks to set a side the s ale o f rea lty ow ned by him and his w ife a s ten ants by the entir eties
. The ap pellant’s unha ppiness w ith the sale seem ingly is caused by the bank ruptcy judge’s2

refusalto is sue rul ings on the vali dity of the option used t o sellthe proper tyor the applic ability of a p ost-nu ptial ag reem ent. A ppar ently, these is sues h ave s om e relation ship to th e ap pella nt’s d ivo rce p roc eed ing s in F lorid a.

No stay was secured before an appeal was t aken to the District Court , which dismis sed the ca se as moot pur suant t o 11 U.S.C. § 363(m). Our explanation of the mootness st atus of uns tay ed sales orders i s set out in L.R .S .C. Co. v. Ric kelHome Ce nter s, Inc . (In re Ric kel H om e C ente rs, In c.) , 209 F.3d 291 (3d Cir . 2000) and Krebs Chrysl er-Pl ymouth, Inc. v. ValleyMotors, I nc. , 141 F.3d 490 ( 3d Cir. 1998) . In Krebs , we said, “t

here are two prerequi sit es for se ction 363( m) ‘statutory’ mootness: (1) the underlying sal e or lea se was not st ayed pe nding the appeal, and (2) the court, if reve rsing or modify ing the authori zati on to sel l or l ease, would beaffecti ng the val idit y of s uch a sale or lease. ” Id . at 49 9. The case before us sati sfies both requirements and a ccordingl y, the appeal will be di smissed.
##### 



Natural Resource Partners L.P.601 Jefferson St., Suite 3600, Houston, TX 77002(NRP LOGO)NEWS RELEASE
 Natural Resource Partners L.P.
Completes Private Placement of Senior Notes
and Amendment and Extension of Revolving Credit Facility
 HOUSTON, March 29, 2007 Natural Resource Partners L.P. (NYSE:NRP and NYSE:NSP)




---



##### 



NRP Completes Debt Private Placement and Amends Credit Facility
  Page 2 of 2  khager@nrplp.com. http://www.nrplp.com.
 07-09
    
    -end-
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3059 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, Oklahoma, as the James Robert Kalsu 

Post Office Building. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 14, 2015 

Mr. RUSSELL (for himself, Mr. LUCAS, Mr. BRIDENSTINE, Mr. MULLIN, and 

Mr. COLE) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, Oklahoma, 

as the James Robert Kalsu Post Office Building. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. JAMES ROBERT KALSU POST OFFICE BUILD4 ING. 

5 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

6 Postal Service located at 4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, 

7 Oklahoma, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘James 

8 Robert Kalsu Post Office Building’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3059 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘James Robert Kalsu 

5 Post Office Building’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### HOSTETTER v. STATE.

No. 13896.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 21, 1931.

Rehearing Denied March 11, 1931.

*166C. P. Hubbeart, of Big 'Lake, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction in the county court of Reagan county as a delinquent child; punishment, ■five years in the State Reform School for Boys at Gatesville.

 Our attention is called by our state’s attorney with this court to the fact that this record contains no notice of appeal. It is provided by our statute that thi§ character of case is in procedure a criminal case, and we have held same to be governed by the rules prescribed in that class of cases. A prerequisite to this court taking jurisdiction of an appealed case of this kind is that notice of appeal must be given and entered of record. None appearing, the appeal will be dismissed.

On Motion to Extend Time to Perfect Record.

HAWKINS, J.

The appeal was dismissed on the 21st day of January because no notice of appeal appeared in the record. On February 5th appellant filed in this court a request for extension of time to perfect the record, basing the request upon an averment that notice of the disposition of the case was misdirected and was delayed in reaching him. There is no showing in the motion that notice of appeal was in fact given, and no facts stated which would indicate that any further delay would avail appellant anything. Up to this time no supplemental transcript has been filed showing any effort to bring the ease within article' 827, C. C. P. (1925) regarding the entry of notice of appeal.

Under the circumstances, we do not feel authorized to grant appellant’s motion, and the same is overruled.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL 12, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash,
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|Date: August 8, 2008                        
|                                            
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                            
|Dean L. Cash                                
|Chairman of the Board, President and Chief  
|Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC
|(Managing Member)                           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 311 

To amend title X of the Public Health Service Act with respect to adoption 

and other pregnancy options counseling. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2015 

Mr. LONG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title X of the Public Health Service Act with 

respect to adoption and other pregnancy options counseling. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Adoption Promotion 

5 Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ADOPTION AND OTHER PREGNANCY OPTIONS 

7 COUNSELING. 

8 Title X of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 300a–1) is amended by adding at the end the following 

10 new section: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 311 IH

1 ‘‘SEC. 1009. ADOPTION AND OTHER PREGNANCY OPTIONS 

2 COUNSELING. 

3 ‘‘(a) INCLUSION OF ADOPTION COUNSELING.—The 

4 Secretary shall ensure that any pregnancy options coun5 seling funded under this title includes adoption counseling. 

6 ‘‘(b) QUALIFIED COUNSELORS.—The Secretary shall 

7 ensure that any pregnancy options counseling funded 

8 under this title is provided by individuals who— 

9 ‘‘(1) are licensed social workers or counselors in 

10 the States in which they practice; and 

11 ‘‘(2) have knowledge and experience in adoption 

12 practice. 

13 ‘‘(c) TRAINING.—Any training provided to an indi14 vidual under section 1003 shall include training on the 

15 adoption process. 

16 ‘‘(d) RESEARCH.— 

17 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—Research funded under sec18 tion 1004 shall include— 

19 ‘‘(A) the collection of data on the number 

20 of pregnancy tests administered to individuals 

21 served by programs under this title and the re22 sults of those tests; and 

23 ‘‘(B) the evaluation of the quality, consist24 ency, and outcomes of pregnancy options coun25 seling funded under this title. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 311 IH

1 ‘‘(2) RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in 

2 this subsection shall be construed to authorize the 

3 collection of personally identifiable information.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Steven C. Bierman, certify that:

 

1.                                      I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of CNH Equipment Trust 2012-B (the “Exchange Act periodic reports”);

 

2.                                      Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.                                      Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4.                                      I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer and based on my knowledge and the compliance review conducted in preparing the servicer compliance statement required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material respects; and

 

5.                                      All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas.

 

----

 
| March 28,   2013 |   |
|-----------------------|--------|
|                  |   |
|                  |   |
|                  | By:    | /s/   Steven C. Bierman |
|                  | Name:  | Steven   C. Bierman |
|                  | Title: | President   (senior officer in charge of the servicing function) |

 

----
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3116 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3116

  To extend by 15 years the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to 
            conduct the quarterly financial report program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2015

  Mr. Ted Lieu of California introduced the following bill; which was 
      referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To extend by 15 years the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to 
            conduct the quarterly financial report program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Quarterly Financial Report 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF COMMERCE TO CONDUCT 
              QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT PROGRAM.

    Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ``An Act to amend title 13, United 
States Code, to transfer responsibility for the quarterly financial 
report from the Federal Trade Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, 
and for other purposes'', approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97-454; 
13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ``2015'' and inserting 
``2030''.
                                 <all>
```
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Daytona Systems, Inc.,  (the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Meuse, President and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joseph Meuse

---------------------------

Joseph Meuse

President and Chief Executive Officer

January 12, 2009