alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(lethal and sub-lethal) and daphnid (sub-lethal) tests. N o adverse effects were observed in the algal test. The measured chronic concern concentration for fish, the most sensitive species of the three, is based on the measured 96-hour LC50 for fish (0.89 mg/L). The chronic concern concentration is derived by dividing the 96-hour LC50 for fish by an acute to chronic ratio of 10, which is then divided by an uncertainty factor of 10. The chronic concern concentration is 9 p pb. The acute concern concentration is derived by dividing the 96-hour LC50 for fish by an uncertainty factor of 5. The acute concern concentration is 178 p pb. For comparative purposes, the chronic and acute concern concentrations for P-11-0224 are 320 p pb an d 4500 p pb, respectively, based on the ECOSAR-based predictions. As a result of the valid test data, the updated chronic and acute concern concentrations are 9 p pb an d 178 p pb, respectively.

Ecotox Study Reviewer: J. Gallagher QA/QC: L. N ewsome 31 March 2011

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 9

SARs neutral organic chemicals SAR Class ether new chemicals category: neutral organics Ecotox Category

Ecotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: L Keifer 564-8916
···" 

• , 

··,.,.. 

• ~ 

\ 

~ 

_; ..... 

.... ... '- . 't 

.~ .... .;o 

·"' ... ~ " :..,. .. .,.. 

. .. 

'!.-

~ .. 

~ ''t .
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the quarterly report of Wilhelmina International, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), I, John P. Murray, Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and




2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.




November
      16, 2009
            
            /s/
      John P. MurrayName:
            John
      P. MurrayTitle:
            Chief
      Financial Officer
              (Principal
      Financial Officer and
              Principal
      Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79631]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22375]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health & Human 
Development; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Eunice 
Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human 
Development Special Emphasis Panel, Optimizing Outcomes of Children and 
Adolescents with Perinatal HIV Exposure (U19), November 07, 2024, 09:00 
a.m. to 05:00 p.m., 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which 
was published in the Federal Register on August 28, 2024, FR Doc. No. 
2024-19290, 89 FR 68911.
    This notice is being amended to change the meeting from a one-day 
meeting on November 7, 2024, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., to a two-day 
meeting starting on November 7, 2024, 9:00 a.m. to November 8, 2024, 
5:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

    Dated: September 25, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-22375 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2235

___________

Donna R. Wallace, as parent and *

next friend of Donna L. Wallace, *

a minor, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the

Bryant School District; Winston F. * Eastern District of Arkansas.

Simpson; Al Polsgrove; Steve *

Griffin; Rebecca P. Sanders; Norris * [UNPUBLISHED]

Medlin; Mike McCreight; Jim Davis; *

Les O&Neal; Allan Stanford, *

*

Appellees. *

___________

 Submitted: February 7, 2000

 Filed: March 14, 2000

___________

Before LOKEN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
1The HONORABLE STEPHEN M. REASONER, United States District Judge

for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

-2-

This is an action challenging the discipline Donna Wallace received for

disrupting her middle school music class. The district court1 granted summary

judgment dismissing all claims, and Donna’s mother appeals. The 42 U.S.C. § 1983

claims for deprivation of liberty and substantive due process are patently frivolous. In

addition, we agree with the reasons stated by the district court for dismissing the

various state law claims. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of the Secretary

In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

On the basis of the best information currently available to the Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).

Iraq

Kuwait

Lebanon

Libya

Qatar

Saudi Arabia

Syria

Yemen

Lindsay Kitzinger,

International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).

[FR Doc. 2024-22428 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.B
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  /s/ John R. SultJohn R. SultSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Controller
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company


February 28, 2007
Exhibit 4.1



PROOF PROOF   PROOF PROOF PROOF PROOF PROOF N U M B E R SHARES WSPT Workspace property   trust A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST FORMED UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF   MARYLANDSEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS C o M M o n s h a r e s o f B e n   e f i C i a L i n T e r e s T CUSIP This CerTifies ThaT: PROOF is The owner   of FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE COMMON SHARES OF BENEFICIAL INTEREST, $0.01   PAR VALUE, OF Workspace property trust (the “Trust”), transferable on the   books of the Trust by the holder hereof in person or by its duly authorized   attorney upon surrender of this Certificate properly endorsed. This   Certificate and the shares represented hereby are issued and shall be held   subject to all of the provisions of the Declaration of Trust and Bylaws of   the Trust and any amendments thereto. This Certificate is not valid unless   countersigned and registered by the Transfer Agent and Registrar. IN WITNESS   WHEREOF, the Trust has caused this Certificate to be executed on its behalf   by its duly authorized officers. DATED: COUNTERSIGNED: BY: BROADRIDGE   CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, INC. 1717 ARCH ST., STE. 1300, PHILADELPHIA, PA   19103 TRANSFER AGENT AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE CHAIRMAN AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE   OFFICERPRESIDENT, CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER AND SECRETARY 


    




 






 



WORKSPACE   PROPERTY TRUST The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on   the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written   out in full according to applicable laws or regulations: TEN COM - as tenants   in commonUNIF GIFT MIN ACT -   ....................Custodian.................... TEN ENT - as tenants by the   entireties(Cust)(Minor) JT TEN-as joint tenants with right ofunder Uniform   Gifts to Minors survivorship and not as tenantsAct   ................................................... in common(State)   Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. For   Value Received, hereby sell, assign and transfer unto PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL   SECURITY OR OTHER IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE (PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE NAME   AND ADDRESS, INCLUDING ZIP CODE, OF ASSIGNEE) Shares of the stock represented   by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and appoint   Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within named Trust   with full power of substitution in the premises. Dated Signature(s)   Guaranteed NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE   NAME AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT   ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE WHATSOEVER. By The Signature(s) must   be guaranteed by an eligible guarantor institution (Banks, Stockbrokers,   Savings and Loan Associations and Credit Unions with membership in an   approved Signature Guarantee Medallion Program), pursuant to SEC Rule   17Ad-15. COLUMBIA PRINTING SERVICES, LLC - www.stockinformation.com
| Exhibit      32.0 |
|-------------------|

| 1. | The      report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of operations      of the Company as of and for the period covered by this      Report. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Thomas F. Gibney                            |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Thomas      F. Gibney                           |
|   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |   | May      15, 2009                               |
|   |   |                                            |
|   |   |                                            |
|   |   |                                            |
|   |   |                                            |
|   | By:    | /s/ Stephen W. Dederick                         |
|   |   | Stephen      W. Dederick                        |
|   |   | Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | May      15, 2009                               |
Exhibit 23
                                                                      ----------


            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
            --------------------------------------------------------

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-112005) pertaining to the Levcor International, Inc.
2002 Stock Option Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.
333-112004) pertaining to the 1994 Carlyle Industries, Inc. 1994 Incentive
Program, as Amended, of our report dated March 16, 2007, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Levcor International, Inc.
included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006.



/s/ Friedman LLP

New York, New York
March 28, 2007
#### BRISCO v. STATE.

No. 13922.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1931.

*180B. Jay Jackson, of Cleburne, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for murder without malice; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

An inspection of the record shows that this appellant pleaded guilty, and, under all the holdings of this court in such case, it only became necessary for the state to introduce some evidence to enable the jury to fix the penalty. There is no doubt but that there was evidence introduced upon this trial.

 Appellant asked for a suspended sentence. The jury in their verdict declined to grant him such suspended sentence. He thereupon filed his motion for new trial, setting up the fact that the evidence introduced against, him was insufficient to support the verdict. To the refusal of the court to grant his motion for new trial, he reserved a bill of exceptions, which is the only exception found in the record.

In our judgment, there is nothing in this case calling for a reversal at the hands of-this court. We know of no authority upon similar facts holding that it is necessary for the state to introduce all the evidence which might be in its possession, or to introduce testimony sufficient to make out a case as when upon the issues there was a controversy. Appellant having entered his plea of guilty after full and sufficient warning by the court, this is taken to admit the truth of all the substantial issues involved, and we think this enough to justify the refusal on our part to reverse because of the insufficieace of the testimony.

The judgment will be affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 10.14
 Hunter Acquisition Corp.
 Orion Marine Group
 Executive Incentive Plan (EIP) Document
Fiscal Year 2006
 I. Objectives
 1.
    
    To provide incentive to Orions Senior Management Team to grow the
overall business of Orion in a profitable manner.2.
    
    To financially reward executives for achievement of overall Company
goals, as well as individual goals.
 II. Eligibility
 3.
    
    Eligibility for the EIP includes the CEO, President & COO, CFO and
Vice President Gulf Coast Region.
 III. Incentive Determination
 4.
    
    The EIP incentive pool will be based on Orions performance and will
be based upon Orions pre-EIP bonus.5.
    
    Formula Component  75% of the incentive determination for EIP participants
will be based on the achievement of the consolidated Net Cash Flow target (the
Target). This component is only available if Company meets or exceeds 80% of Target.6.
    
    Discretion Component  25% of the incentive determination for EIP
participants will based on annually agreed to individual objectives. This
component is only available if Company meets or exceeds 80% of Target.
 IV. Award Allocation
 7.
    
    Earned awards are payable only if an EIP participant is an employee
in good standing. Good standing means that, at the time of payout, an
employee:
 a)
    
    has not resigned,b)
    
    has not indicated an intention to resign,c)
    
    has not been notified that their employment has been
terminated,d)
    
    is not on a performance improvement program.




---



##### 



V. Timing and Payout Form
 8.
    
    Incentive awards will be calculated and are payable as soon as
practical following the close of the fiscal year. Awards will be paid as
ordinary income and will be subject to payroll tax withholding.
 VI. Termination of Employment
 9.
    
    Any EIP awards are forfeited in cases of termination.10.
    
    If an employee terminates prior to the fiscal years close because
of death or disability (as defined in Companys long-term disability plan),
EIP awards will be prorated for the year.
 VII. Plan Administration
 11.
    
    The EIP Administrator will be a committee approved by the Board of
Directors Compensation Committee.12.
    
    The EIP Administrator will approve annually developed performance
measures, performance standards, and award levels, subject to the approval of
the Board of Directors Compensation Committee.13.
    
    The EIP Administrator will approve all finalized award payments
before submission to payroll, subject to the approval of the Board of
Directors Compensation Committee.15.
    
    The EIP Administrator will have all authority to approve
continuation, modification or elimination of the Plan based upon a review of
actual results, subject to the approval of the Board of Directors
Compensation Committee.16.
    
    Terms of valid employment agreements, if any, supercede the terms
and conditions of this document.
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Group

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 95-410 Date: October 23, 1995 

SUBJECT: FEHB Open Season: Notice of Plan Withdrawal

This is to alert you to the fact that CIGNA HealthCare of Florida (code EJ) is

withdrawing from the FEHB program effective December 31, 1995. Unfortunately, the

FEHB Guides had already gone to print when the decision to withdraw was made and

the plan's name does appear in the Guides. The plan has sent notices of the

withdrawal to its enrollees, but enrollees in this plan who do not change health plans

during open season will not have health benefits for 1996.

If you have field installations in the Tampa Bay area, please notify them directly of the

plan's withdrawal. With the beginning of open season less than three weeks away, it is

extremely important that they are notified of the withdrawal as soon as possible.

Thank you for your assistance.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy and

 Information Division
EXHIBIT
      31.1


CERTIFICATION






I,
      Edward
      B. Kornfeld, certify that:




1. I
      have
      reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Porta Systems Corp.;




2. Based
      on my
      knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact
      or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
      light
      of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with
      respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
      on my
      knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in
      this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
      periods presented in this report;




4. I
      am
      responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
      (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
      registrant and I have:




a)
      designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
      material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)
      evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)
      disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and




5. I
      have
      disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
      reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the
      registrant’s board of directors:




a)
      all
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
      report financial information; and




b)
      any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
      reporting.







/s/
      Edward B. Kornfeld


Edward
      B.
      Kornfeld


Chief
      Executive Officer


Chief
      Financial Officer


eDWAChief
      Financial Officer








March
      30,
      2006
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 1003

_____________________________
L AMONT A SBERRY , Appellant,

v.

S TATE O F F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Steven B. Whittington , Judge

. March 5, 2019

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. W OLF , M AKAR , and M.K. T HOMAS , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Lamont Asberry, pro se
, Appellant.2 Ashley B. Moody , Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7828
CHARLES WILLIAM EVANS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-696-5-F) Submitted: March 13, 1997 Decided: June 5, 1997 Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Evans v. North Carolina Dep't of Correction , No. CA-96-696-5-F (E.D.N.C. Nov. 12, 1996). We deny Appellant's motion to continue the case inlight of his prison grievance and his request for this court to obtain certain records on his behalf. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED