alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1
 700 LOUISIANA STREET
    
    FAX: 713 225-6475SUITE 4300
    
    TELEPHONE: 713 570-3200HOUSTON, TEXAS 77002
 
  Pioneer Announces The Expansion of Its Chlor-Alkali Plant  in St. Gabriel, Louisiana
   
    
    expanding the sites manufacturing capacity by 49,000 ECUs to meet the demand
from nearby industrial customers for chlorine supplied by pipeline at a competitive
delivered price;
 
    
    meeting increasing customer demand for high-quality membrane caustic soda;
 
    
    significantly lower variable and fixed unit costs at the plant, due to:
 
    
    improved energy efficiency from the new membrane cells
which use approximately 29% less energy than the technology currently used
at the plant; and
 
    
    reduced maintenance and operating costs resulting from
the use of the newer technology;
 
    
    the incremental gross margin contribution from the additional 49,000 ECUs of
production capacity; and
 
    
    eliminating the use of mercury at this plant.




---



##### 



-2-




---



##### 



www.piona.com
   -3-




---



##### 



Contact:
    
    Gary PittmanSenior Vice President and CFO(713) 570-3200
 -4-
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 99-2358

___________

Roeles Ortiz, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

United States of America, *

*

Appellee. *

__________ Appeals from the United States

District Court for the Southern

No. 99-2360 District of Iowa.

__________

 [UNPUBLISHED]

Sean Demarco Stone, *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

United States of America, *

*

Appellee. *

__________

No. 99-2413

__________

Eric Gabriel Ortiz, *
-2-

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

United States of America, *

*

Appellee. *

__________

No. 99-2462

__________

Ramon Ortiz, Jr., *

*

Appellant, *

*

v. *

*

United States of America, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

Submitted: January 10, 2000

Filed: February 3, 2000 

___________

Before RICHARD S. ARNOLD, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.
-3-

Roeles Ortiz, Sean Demarco Stone, Eric Gabriel Ortiz, and Ramon Ortiz, Jr.

(collectively Appellants) appeal the district court's adverse rulings on their motions for

new trial and to vacate their sentences. We affirm.

The Appellants raise several contentions in support of their claims for a new trial

and for correction of their sentences. Having reviewed the record, we reject their

arguments. We agree with the district court's conclusions that, first, the newly

discovered exculpatory evidence the government failed to disclose would not likely

produce an acquittal if a new trial were granted or provide a basis to correct the

Appellants' sentences, and second, because the withheld evidence does not undermine

confidence in the verdicts and the sentences, the evidence does not satisfy the

materiality requirement under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87 (1963). We also

conclude the district court's sentence-related factual findings about drug quantities and

roles in the offenses are not clearly erroneous, the district court properly imposed a

weapons enhancement, and the district court neither violated nor misapplied the

sentencing guidelines. We are satisfied the district court properly denied the

Appellants' motions for a new trial and to vacate their sentences, the appeal simply

involves the application of settled principles of law to unique facts, and the issues do

not warrant a comprehensive opinion. We thus affirm the district court without further

discussion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Official Journal C 290/23 N

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 290 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4823 November 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 290

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4823 November 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Commission |
| 2005/C 290/1 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Commission

2005/C 290/1

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Order filed August 21, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

NO. 01-18-00599-CR

JOSE RUPERTO ALANIZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 30th District Court

Witchita County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 55,523-A

ORDER

This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State’s Exhibit No. 83, a 

DVD of surveillance video from State West, admitted in the trial held on April 17, 

2018.
The exhibit clerk of the 30th District Court is directed to deliver to the 

Clerk of this Court the original of State’s Exhibit No. 83, a DVD of surveillance 

video from State West, admitted in the jury trial held on April 17, 2018, on or before

August 31, 2018. The Clerk of this Court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep 

safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; 

and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State’s Exhibit No. 83,

to the clerk of the 30th District Court.

PER CURIAM

2
No. 72-1157.

#### Air Cargo, Inc., et al. *v.*Breen Air Freight, Ltd., et al.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO§906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of ATEL 12, LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2.

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: May 13, 2011/s/ Dean L. CashDean L. Cash Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Associates 12, LLC (Managing Member)
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 242 (Thursday, December 17, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 78705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-31661]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 82

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0453; FRL-9940-31-OAR]
RIN 2060-AS51

Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Update to the Refrigerant 
Management Requirements Under the Clean Air Act; Extension of Comment 
Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a proposed rule in the Federal Register on November 
9, 2015, proposing to update service practices that reduce emissions of 
ozone-depleting refrigerants as well as extend them, as appropriate, to 
non-ozone-depleting substitute refrigerants. The November 9, 2015, 
proposal provided for a 60-day public comment period ending January 8, 
2016. EPA received requests from the public to extend this comment 
period. This document extends the comment period for 17 days, from 
January 8, 2016, to January 25, 2016.

DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA-
HQ-OAR-2015-0453, must be received on or before January 25, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES 
in the Federal Register document of November 9, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luke Hall-Jordan, Stratospheric 
Protection Division, Office of Atmospheric Programs, Mail Code 6205T, 
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number 
(202) 343-9591; email address hall-jordan.luke@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This document extends the public comment 
period established in the proposed rule published in the Federal 
Register on November 9, 2015 (80 FR 69457) (FRL-9933-48-OAR). In that 
document, EPA solicited comments and information on its proposed rule 
titled ``Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Update to the Refrigerant 
Management Requirements under the Clean Air Act.'' EPA received 
requests from members of the public to extend the comment period. EPA 
is hereby extending the comment period, which was previously set to end 
on January 8, 2016, to January 25, 2016. Accordingly, any comments on 
this proposed rule must be received on or before January 25, 2016.
    To submit comments, or access the public docket, please follow the 
detailed instructions as provided under ADDRESSES in the November 9, 
2015, Federal Register document. If you have questions, consult the 
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 82

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals, 
Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: December 10, 2015.
Sarah Dunham,
Director, Office of Atmospheric Programs.
[FR Doc. 2015-31661 Filed 12-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR'S REPORT

Shareholders and Board of Directors
Level 8 Systems, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, changes
in shareholders' equity, and cash flows of Level 8 Systems, Inc. for the year
ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatements. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in
all material respects, the consolidated results of operations and cash flows of
Level 8 Systems, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principles.


                              /s/ Lurie, Besikof, Lapidus & Co., LLP
                              LURIE, BESIKOF, LAPIDUS & CO., LLP

Minneapolis, Minnesota
January 31, 1997, (except for Note 3, as to which the dated is April 6, 1998)
#### WHARTON v. STATE.

No. 20728.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1939.

Bartlett & Bartlett, of Marlin, for - appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Upon a plea of guilty appellant was convicted of theft of cattle, and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant asked for a suspended sentence which the jury declined to recommend.

We have not been furnished with a statement of facts. Appellant brings forward three bills of exception complaining of matters which he says impinged on his plea for suspended sentence.

Bill of exception number one recited that the district attorney asked appellant if he “farmed during the year 1938.” The .bill fails to show whether the question was ever answered, and if so, what the answer was. The bill then recites that appellant offered to show that on account of illness he was unable to work during the time mentioned. The court refused the proffered testimony and appellant complained of " such ruling. In the absence of a statement of facts we think the bill of exception presents no reversible error.

Bill number two recites that appellant placed his wife on the witness stand and proved by her appellant’s good reputation as a law-abiding citizen, and that he had never been convicted of a felony, and that on cross examination the district attorney asked her “what offense the defendant had been convicted of in the years 1928 and 1929 in Federal Court,” and that over appellant’s objection the court required the witness to answer, but the bill is entirely silent as to what the answer was. This bill presents no error. See Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., Sec. 210; 4 Tex.Jur., Sec. 211, p. 303.

Bill number three complains tha* the court over appellant’s objection per*878mitted the State to elicit the fact that some seven or eight years prior to the present trial appellant had been “charged” with the theft of chickens. .Appellant’s objection was that it was too remote and because appellant had never been indicted upon such charge. Of course, if the accusation for chicken theft had never been merged into a legal charge the State could not prove the incident. See 45 Tex.Jur., Sec. 241, p. 102, and Branch’s Ann.Tex.P.C., Sec. 167, p. 101; Newton v. State, 94 Tex. Cr.R. 288, 250 S.W. 1036. However, the bill recites that the inquiry of the State about chicken theft charge occurred “after defendant had shown that he had never been indicted for the alleged offense and was innocent of the charge.” 'It thus appears from the bill that appellant first developed the chicken theft incident, whatever it may have been, and the inquiry by the State could not under the circumstances be held reversible error.

The judgment is affirmed.
| **CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Parenthetical) (USD $)** | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|----------------|
||
| **Statement of Stockholders' Equity [Abstract]**                                     |           |           |   |   |
| Cash Dividends on Common Stock (in dollars per share)                                | $ 0.05         | $ 0.03         | $ 0.13 | $ 0.07 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends paid during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 04 -Article 3Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=27012166&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareCashPaid**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_StatementOfStockholdersEquityAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### NIEDECKEN v. STATE.

No. 18438.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

W. J. Arrington, of Hamlin, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for swindling, punishment assessed being a fine of $10 and one day in jail.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such con dition, nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONOF PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

 

In connection with this QuarterlyReport of Kabe Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2008, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Erik Ulsteen,President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of the Company, certifies tothe best of my knowledge, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuantto Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| 1 | Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q  for the quarter ending March 31, 2008, fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934; and |
|---|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| 2 | The information contained in  such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31,  2008, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and  results of operations of the Company. |
|---|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

 
| Date: May 13, 2008                                  |
|----------------------------------------------------------|
| /s/ Erik Ulsteen                                         |   |
| Erik UlsteenPresident  Chief Financial Officer Secretary |

 

----
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended
October 2, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory W. Hunt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Gregory W. Hunt    
|Gregory W. Hunt        
|Chief Financial Officer
|November 12, 2010      



40
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80276]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22618]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 347 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-693, CP2024-702.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22618 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 23, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 373 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-729, K2024-22.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22670 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P