alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79299]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22123]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Notice of Closed 
Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Heart, Lung, and Blood Initial Review Group; 
NHLBI Single-Site and Pilot Clinical Trials Study Section.
    Date: October 23-24, 2024.
    Time: 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: Canopy by Hilton 940 Rose Avenue North Bethesda, MD 
20852.
    Contact Person: YingYing Li-Smerin, MD, Ph.D. Scientific Review 
Officer Office of Scientific Review/DERA National Heart, Lung, and 
Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, 6705 Rockledge 
Drive,Room 207-P, Bethesda, MD 20892-7924 301-827-7942 email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#c9a5a0baa4acbba0a789a7a1a5aba0e7a7a0a1e7aea6bf"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="066a6f756b63746f6846686e6a646f28686f6e28616970">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.233, 
National Center for Sleep Disorders Research; 93.837, Heart and 
Vascular Diseases Research; 93.838, Lung Diseases Research; 93.839, 
Blood Diseases and Resources Research, National Institutes of 
Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 13, 2024.
Bruce A. George,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-22123 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ALVIN S. KANOFSKY,

Petitioner

v.

CITY OF BETHLEHEM,

Respondent :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 438 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 3rd day of January, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
**EXHIBIT
  32.**1



**CERTIFICATION
  PURSUANT TO**

**18
  U.S.C. SECTION
  1350,**

**AS
  ADOPTED PURSUANT
  TO**

**SECTION
  906 OF THE
  SARBANES-OXLEY
  ACT OF 2002**





In
  connection
  with the Annual
  Report of
  PRINCETON
  AMERICAN CORPORATION
  (the "Company")
  on Form 10-KSB
  for the period
  ending May
  31, 2003 as
  filed with
  the Securities
  and Exchange
  Commission
  on the date
  hereof (the
  "Report"),
  pursuant to
  18 U.S.C.
  § 1350,
  as adopted
  pursuant to
  § 906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley
  Act of 2002,
  I, William
  Taylor, Chief
  Executive
  Officer of
  the Company,
  certify, that
  to the best
  of my knowledge:



(1)  The
  Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)
   The
  information
  contained
  in the Report
  fairly presents,
  in all material
  respects,
  the financial
  condition
  and results
  of operations
  of the Company.





/s/
  William Taylor

- -----------------------------

William
  Taylor

Chairman,
  Chief Executive
  Officer and
  Director



September 30, 2003









-------------------------



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906
  HAS BEEN PROVIDED
  TO PRINCETON
  AMERICAN CORPORATION
  AND WILL BE
  RETAINED BY
  PRINCETON
  AMERICAN CORPORATION
  AND FURNISHED
  TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

BENNY FRANK DELANEY,

 Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

 Appellee. 

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-10-00011-CR

Appeal from

 252nd District Court

of Jefferson County, Texas

(TC # 07-01962)

O P I N I O N

Benny Frank Delaney appeals his conviction of felony theft. He complains that his two year

sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under both the Eighth Amendment of the United

States Constitution and Article I, section 13 of the Texas Constitution. For the following reasons,

we affirm. 

FACTUAL SUMMARY

Appellant entered a plea of guilty to the offense of felony theft on May 7, 2008. The trial

court deferred his adjudication of guilt, and placed him on community supervision for two years. 

The State subsequently filed a motion to adjudicate, alleging Appellant violated several conditions

of community supervision. The motion alleged that Appellant failed to report by mail to the

probation department for the months of May, June, August, and September of 2009, failed to work

faithfully at employment; failed to perform community service hours, and owed $757 in restitution. 

At the revocation hearing, Appellant pled true to the allegations that he failed to report to the

probation department and that he failed to pay court-assessed fees. The trial court found the

evidence sufficient to prove Appellant had violated the conditions as alleged in the motion. The
court granted the State’s motion, adjudicated Appellant’s guilt, and assessed his punishment at

confinement in the state jail for a term of two years. This appeal follows. 

PRESERVATION OF ERROR

In Points of Review One and Two, Appellant contends that his sentence of two years’

imprisonment is grossly disproportionate to the offense in violation of the Eighth Amendment of the

United States Constitution and Article I, section13 of the Texas Constitution. The State responds

that Appellant waived both issues for appellate review. We agree.

To preserve error for appellate review, the record must show Appellant made a timely

request, objection, or motion. See TEX.R.APP.P. 33.1(a)(1). Even constitutional rights, such as the

right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, may be waived. See Rhoades v. State, 934

S.W.2d 113, 120 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Curry v. State, 910 S.W.2d 490, 498 (Tex.Crim.App.

1995).

Appellant asserts that he raised the sentencing issue in a post-verdict motion filed with the

trial court on November 16, 2009, and he directs our attention to a portion of the clerk’s record. But

the record does not contain either a motion raising this issue or an adverse ruling by the trial court. 

We note that the trial court conducted the hearing on the State’s motion to adjudicate on November

30, 2009 and pronounced sentence on that same date. Further, the docket sheet does not reflect that

the court ruled on any post-sentencing motions. Finding that Appellant has not preserved his issues

for review, we overrule Issues One and Two and affirm the judgment of the trial court. 

July 6, 2011 

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Justice

Before Chew, C.J., McClure, and Rivera, JJ.
(Do Not Publish)
#### Mathilda Bueno et al., Plaintiffs, *v.*National Transportation Co., Inc., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Kings County,

September 25, 1953.

*James A. Doherty*for National Transportation Co., Inc., defendant.

*Edward B. Bromley*for New England Transportation Co., defendant.

Benjamin Brenner, J.

This is a motion by the defendant National Transportation Company, hereinafter called “ National,” to dismiss the cross complaint of the codefendant, New England Transportation Company, Inc., hereinafter called “New England,” for legal insufficiency. The action is to recover damages for personal injuries. The complaint alleges that plaintiffs were passengers in a taxicab owned and operated *592by National; that the taxicab owned by National and the vehicle owned by New England collided with each other by reason of the negligence of the defendants. National’s contention that plaintiff has pleaded active negligence solely as to New England, presumably because of the language used in paragraph Eighteenth of the complaint, is negated by both paragraphs Tenth and Nineteenth thereof which disprove the conténtion that the acts of negligence complained of were passive as to the moving party. No judgment over may be awarded where the negligent act of the party seeking the indemnity concurred in the wrong *(Middleton*v. *City of New York,*276 App. Div. 780; *Mongiovi*v. *Olna Realty Corp.,*170 Misc. 403), unless there is a right to indemnification, either expressed or implied. *(Tangney*v. *Skapof,*81 N. Y. S. 2d 831.) Where, however, one of the two defendants is a passive wrongdoer, the other, who is guilty of active negligence, is liable to him for indemnification. (N*ew York Cons. R. R. Co.*v. *Massachusetts Bonding & Ins. Co.,*193 App. Div. 438, affd. 233 N. Y. 547.) The right of indemnification is based upon the proposition that one is responsible for his own negligence and if another is compelled to pay damages for his wrongs they may be recovered from him. *(Oceanic Steam Nav. Co.*v. *Compania Transatlantica Espanola,*134 N. Y. 461.) Here the complaint alleges that both defendants were negligent in operating their respective vehicles, which acts concurred in producing the accident. It is thus alleged that they were joint tort-feasors *in pari delicto*and the complaint clearly charges both defendants with active and primary responsibility. There is no basis in fact or in law for indemnity. None is claimed by reason of contract and none is presented under common-law principles. Judgment against New England can only be based upon its own tort and not for any wrong of National. The motion is accordingly granted.

Settle order on notice.
Contact:
            G.
                George Lu508-624-4948







**2020
      CHINACAP ACQUIRCO, INC.**




**ANNOUNCES
      CHANGES TO TRUST ACCOUNT INVESTMENTS**









NEW
      YORK,
      NEW YORK, October 30, 2008 - In consideration of the current market conditions,
      2020 ChinaCap Acquirco, Inc. (AMEX:TTY) (the “Company”) directed LaSalle Global
      Trust Services, the trustee of the Company’s assets being held in trust (the
“Trustee”), to transfer the funds held in trust from a money market fund which
      invests in U.S. Government obligations into the Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash
      Management Fund which invests solely in U.S. treasuries. The balance in the
      Company’s trust account as of September 30, 2008 was $68,540,724.69.






The
      assets contained in the Dreyfus Treasury Prime Cash Management Fund are
      segregated from the assets of its investment adviser. Such assets are not,
      and
      would not be, available to general creditors of such institution in the event
      that such institution were to file for, or become subject to, bankruptcy
      protection. The Company and the Trustee are closely monitoring the funds held
      in
      trust in this volatile market and expect to take whatever actions that are
      deemed appropriate to protect and preserve the assets contained in the Company’s
      trust account.




The
      Company is a public acquisition company formed for the purpose of acquiring,
      through a merger, stock exchange, asset acquisition or other similar business
      combination, an operating business that is either located in China, has its
      principal operations located in China, or would benefit from establishing
      operations in China.




Any
      statements contained in this press release that do not describe historical
      facts
      may constitute forward-looking statements as that term is defined by the United
      States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any such
      forward-looking statements contained herein are based on current expectations,
      but are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that may cause actual
      results to differ materially from expectations such as material adverse events
      affecting the Company, the ability of Company to satisfy the conditions to
      completion of the business combination and those other risks and uncertainties
      detailed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
##### 



EXHIBIT 2.1
 AMENDMENT NO. 1
TO
SECOND CONTRIBUTION AGREEMENT
 Amendment Partnership General Partner Buyer Parent Seller
 WITNESSETH:
 Agreement
 Unit Splits
    1.
    
    The definition of Transaction Units in Article I shall be deleted and
replaced with the following definition:
 Transaction Units provided however Transaction
Units
 2.
    
    The definition of Partnership Agreement in Article I shall be deleted and
replaced with the following definition:
 Partnership Agreement




---



##### 



3.
    
    The clause and except as expressly set forth in this Agreement or the other
Transaction Documents, there are outstanding found in the third sentence of Section 4.2(a)
shall be deleted and replaced with the following:
  4.
    
    A new section 10.18 shall be added to Article X as follows:
 Anti-Dilution
 5.
    
    The provisions of this Amendment shall be effective upon the consummation of
the Unit Splits.6.
    
    Except as expressly amended hereby, all other terms and provisions of the
Agreement shall continue in full force and effect.
 [ ]




---



##### 



BUYER:NRP (Operating) LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Nick CarterNick CarterPresident and Chief Operating OfficerTHE GENERAL PARTNER:NRP (GP) LPBy:
    
    GP Natural Resource Partners LLC,its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Nick CarterNick CarterPresident and Chief Operating OfficerTHE PARTNERSHIP:Natural Resource Partners L.P.By:
    
    NRP (GP) LP, its general partnerBy:
    
    GP Natural Resource Partners LLC,its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Nick CarterNick CarterPresident and Chief Operating Officer




---



##### 



PARENT:FORESIGHT RESERVES LPBy:
    
    INSIGHT RESOURCE, LLC,its general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Donald HolcombDonald HolcombAuthorized PersonSELLER:ADENA MINERALS, LLCBy:
    
    /s/ Donald HolcombDonald HolcombAuthorized Person
NAREA GS Deposit Calculation Worksheet

Employee Name: Retirement Plan: 

A B C D E F G H I

Period Grade/Step

Difference in Hourly 

rate from Table A

Times 80 

hours

Difference in Pay 

per Pay Period Times Employee Deduction Rate

Difference in Employee Deductions per 

Pay Period

Times Number of Pay 

Periods

Additional Employee 

Deductions Owed

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

A B C D E F G H I

Period Grade/Step

Difference in Hourly 

rate from Table A

Times 80 

hours

Difference in Pay 

per Pay Period Times Employee Deduction Rate

Difference in Employee Deductions per 

Pay Period

Times Number of Pay 

Periods

Additional Employee 

Deductions Owed

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 0.8% $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

$0.00

A B C D E F G H I

Period Grade/Step

Difference in Hourly 

rate from Table A

Times 80 

hours

Difference in Pay 

per Pay Period Times Employee Deduction Rate

Difference in Employee Deductions per 

Pay Period

Times Number of Pay 

Periods

Additional Employee 

Deductions Owed

$0.00

$0.00

K. Additional Interest Owed

L. Total Employee Deductions and Interest

Total Additional Employee Contributions Owed for Entire Period

J. Total for Year

K. Additional Interest Owed

L. Total Employee Deductions and Interest

Employee Deductions for Pay Year: 2012

J. Total for Year

Employee Deductions for Pay Year:

K. Additional Interest Owed

L. Total Employee Deductions and Interest

2011

J. Total for Year

FERS

Employee Deductions for Pay Year: 2010

September 2011
NAREA GS Deposit Calculation Worksheet

A B C D E F G H I

Period Grade/Step

Difference in Hourly 

rate from Table A

Times 80 

hours

Difference in Pay 

per Pay Period Times Agency Contribution Rate

Difference in Agency Contributions per 

Pay Period

Times Number of Pay 

Periods

Additional Agency 

Contributions Owed

80 $0.00 11.2% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.2% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.2% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.7% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.7% $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

A B C D E F G H I

Period Grade/Step

Difference in Hourly 

rate from Table A

Times 80 

hours

Difference in Pay 

per Pay Period Times Agency Contribution Rate

Difference in Agency Contributions per 

Pay Period

Times Number of Pay 

Periods

Additional Agency 

Contributions Owed

80 $0.00 11.7% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.7% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.7% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.7% $0.00 $0.00

80 $0.00 11.7% $0.00 $0.00

$0.00

A B C D E F G H I

Period Grade/Step

Difference in Hourly 

rate from Table A

Times 80 

hours

Difference in Pay 

per Pay Period Times Agency Contribution Rate

Difference in Agency Contributions per 

Pay Period

Times Number of Pay 

Periods

Additional Agency 

Contributions Owed

$0.00

Total Additional Agency Contributions Owed for Entire Period $0.00

2012

Total for Year

Agency Deductions for Pay Year:

Total for Year

Total for Year

Agency Deductions for Pay Year: 2011

Agency Deductions for Pay Year: 2010

September 2011
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 04-310 Date: December 2004 

Subject: FEHBP Cost Factor for First Quarter of FY 2005 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) 

for the first quarter of FY 2005. A quarterly cost factor will also be provided to you near the end of 

the second and third quarters of the Fiscal Year. The annual imputed cost factors for all civilian 

benefit programs will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2005. 

The FEHBP cost factor for the first quarter of FY 2005 is $1,195. 

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. You may of course call us on 202-606-0606. 

 

Robert A. Yuran, Manager 

Financial Policy Group 

Center for Financial Services
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) / Rule 15d-14(a),
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TE Products Pipeline Company, LLC;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [intentionally omitted pursuant to SEC Release No. 34-47986];c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting.
 November 7, 2007
    /s/  WILLIAM G. MANIASWilliam G. ManiasVice President and Chief Financial Officer
TEPPCO GP, Inc., Sole Manager
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees

Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement

System Insurance Program System

United States

Office of

Personnel Management

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service

Benefits Administration Letter

 

Number: 01-305 Date: January 9, 2001

Subject: Physicians’ Comparability Allowances

Note: This letter supercedes BAL 01-304, on the same subject, which has been withdrawn.

Agencies have been authorized for a number of years to make comparability allowance payments,

known as physicians’ comparability allowances (PCAs), under certain conditions. PCAs have

previously not been included in basic pay for the purpose of the Civil Service Retirement System

(CSRS) and the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS). However, with the enactment on

December 28, 2000, of Public Law 106-571 -- the "Federal Physicians Comparability Allowance

(PCA) Amendments of 2000" -- PCAs now constitute basic pay for purposes of retirement

deductions under both CSRS and FERS. 

Thus, effective with the first payroll period beginning on or after December 28, 2000, CSRS and

FERS deductions must be deducted from PCAs. For most employees, this would be the pay

period beginning on December 31, 2000.

The use of PCAs in the computation of CSRS and FERS benefits is subject to complex eligibility

requirements. For most individuals, PCAs will constitute basic pay for benefit computation on a

phased-in basis. Procedures will have to be prepared to ensure that these provisions are

appropriately implemented, and we will transmit further information and guidance as it is

developed.

Please be aware that PCAs do NOT constitute basic pay for purposes of deductions for Federal

Employees Group Life Insurance purposes.

We regret the short notice on this matter, but the language of the law afforded us little lead-time.

If you have any questions regarding this information, we would prefer that you email us at

finance@opm.gov, so that we have a record of our communication. You may also phone us on

(202) 606-0606.

Robert A. Yuran, Chief

Financial Policy Staff