alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
us bank(logo)

All of us serving you(logo)





Annual Statement of Compliance

UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C2



VIA: EMAIL



UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp.

1285 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10019

Attention: Nicholas G. Galeone

Email: nicholas.galeone@ubs.com



17g5informationprovider@usbank.com





| | Re: | The Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”) dated as of July 1, 2012
among UBS Commercial Mortgage Securitization Corp., as depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as master servicer, CWCapital
Asset Management LLC, as special servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as operating advisor, and U.S. Bank National Association,
as trustee, certificate administrator, paying agent and custodian
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





I, Kimberly O. Jacobs,
a Senior Vice President of U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator hereby certify that:



(1) A review of the activities
of the Certificate Administrator during the preceding calendar year (the “Reporting Period”) and of the performance
of the Certificate Administrator under the Agreement have been made under my supervision; and



(2) To the best of my knowledge,
based on such review, the Certificate Administrator has fulfilled its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects
throughout such Reporting Period.



Capitalized terms used
but not defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Agreement.





Date: March 1, 2018





U.S. Bank National Association, as Certificate Administrator





| | By: | /s/ Kimberly O. Jacobs
| | --- | ----------------------

Kimberly O. Jacobs

Senior Vice President
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, October 29, 2015. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, October 29, 2015 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A16D0067. SEAN DOLYK v. MARK BUTLER, COMMISSIONER OF GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR et al..
Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 14108967
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Long Term 

Care Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-309 Date: May 13, 2002 

Subject: Request for Employers' Identification Number

Your agency or retirement system may have received bills dunning you as an employer for 

amounts owed to the Medicare Program. This letter requests your assistance in an attempt to 

reduce the occurrence of these invalid bills. 

By way of background, many individuals have both Federal Employees Health Benefits Program 

(FEHB) and Medicare coverage. The law establishes that one of the two programs must pay 

benefits in full as the primary payer, while the other pays a reduced benefit as the secondary 

payer. Generally, the FEHB is the primary payer for active Federal employees, whereas 

Medicare is primary for annuitants. 

The Medicare administrator, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), formerly 

the Health Care Financing Administration, has established a data-match to identify instances 

where it paid benefits as the primary payer, but should have paid as secondary payer. When it 

identifies such instances, the CMS recognizes a receivable and seeks to collect the overpaid 

benefits from the employer or retirement system of the pertinent individual. Hence, the bills you 

may have received. 

OPM is working with CMS to improve the match process and reduce future agency billings. 

CMS has agreed to suspend collections while the system is being improved. We need your help 

to reduce and hopefully eliminate the CMS dunning of Federal employing agencies and 

retirement systems. Specifically, we want to provide the CMS with a list of the employer 

identification numbers (EINs) of Federal agencies/retirement systems which have 

employees/annuitants with FEHB coverage. We will provide the EINs to CMS, which will in 

turn incorporate them into their database. By citing the EIN, CMS will be able to correctly 

identify employers as Federal employing agencies and retirement systems and forgo the dunning 

process. 
2

We would ask that each agency payroll office and retirement system complete the attached form 

and return it to us no later than June 1, 2002 via email to Finance@opm.gov, or fax to (202) 606-

7944. 

If you have any questions regarding this information, we would prefer that you email your 

questions to us at finance@opm.gov, so we have a record of our communication. You may also 

phone us on (202) 606-0606. 

 Robert A. Yuran, Chief 

 Financial Policy Staff 

 Retirement and Insurance Service
3

EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 

Employer Identification Number 

Agency Name 

Associated Payroll Office Number(s) 

Contact: 

 Name (print): 

 Telephone Number 

 Email address 

Please email to Finance@opm.gov no later than June 1, 2002.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert T. Ladd, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Name:

          

          /s/ Robert T. LaddRobert T. LaddDate:

          

          March 5, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.1






     CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED  PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the  Annual  Report  of  Possis  Medical,  Inc.  (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year  ended  July 31,  2003,  as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Robert
G. Dutcher,  Chief  Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     1. The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





                                                      /s/
                                             Robert G. Dutcher
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             October 29, 2003
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 20857.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 14, 1940.

C. M. Turlington and C. W. Feild, both of Marshall, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted on a charge of driving an automobile upon a public highway in Harrison County while intoxicated, and was assessed a penalty of ninety days in jail together with a fine of $100.

There are no bills of exception in the record and nothing complaining of any error committed by the court. The indictment appears to be regular. The charge properly presents the law, and the facts amply support the finding of the jury.

No error appearing, in the record, we think that the finding of the jury is conclusive, and the case is accordingly affirmed.
KPMG Peat Marwick LLP

     Suite 2000
     1211 South West Fifth Avenue
     Portland, OR 97204



               Consent of Independent Certified Public Accountants


The Board of Directors
Potlatch Corporation:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos.
33-00805, 33-28220, 333-17145, 33-30836, 33-54515, 333-12017 and 333-28079) on 
Form S-8 of Potlatch Corporation of our report dated January 21, 1998, except
as to Note 16, which is as of February 9, 1998, relating to the balance sheets
of Potlatch Corporation and consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31, 1997
and 1996 and the related statements of earnings, stockholders' equity, and
cash flows and related financial statement schedule for each of the years in
the three-year period ended December 31, 1997 which report appears in the 
December 31, 1997 annual report on the Form 10-K of Potlatch Corporation.




                                                KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

March 27, 1998
              

                                                                 Exhibit (23)
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances

set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-40677

Summary Calendar

 

ESSIE T. COOPER,

Planitiff-Appellant,

versus

KILGORE JUNIOR COLLEGE;

WILLIAM HOLDA,

Defendants-Appellees.

 

Appeal from the United States District Court for

the Eastern District of Texas

(USDC No. 6:98-CV-556)

_______________________________________________________

January 25, 2001

Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Plaintiff-appellant Essie T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order adopting

the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions and entering summary judgment for
2

the defendants. Cooper’s claims are time-barred for the reasons given in the

magistrate judge’s report of April 11, 2000.

Affirmed.
[ DO NOT PUBLISH] 

## In the 

# United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________
No. 20

- 13621
Non

- Argument Calendar

____________________
HOSSENI TABARESTANI,
Plaintiff

- Appellant,

versus WALMART, INC.,

Defendant

- Appellee.

____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 0:18

- cv

- 62963

- LSS

____________________ USCA11 Case: 20-13621 Date Filed: 03/24/2022 Page: 1 of 32 Opinion of the Court 20

- 13621

Before J ORDAN , N EWSOM , and B LACK , Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:
Hossein Tabarestani brought a negligence action against Walmart, Inc. based on injuries Tabarestani sustained from a slip and fall on the premises of a Sam’s Club located in Bluffton, South Carolina. After a three

- day jury trial, the jury returne d a verdict in favor of Walmart. Subsequently, Tab a restani filed post

- trial motions for a new trial and relief from judgment. The magistrate judge 1 denied both motions in a thorough Omnibus Order on Post

- Trial Motions. 2 Tabarestani asserts the dist rict court erred in five ways : (1) in ruling there was no fraud, misrepresentation, or misconduct by Walmart ; (2) by not admitting Walmart’s internal policies andprocedures and Walmart’s answers to Tabarestani’s interrogatories; (3) in not compelling Wal mart Manager Christopher Graft’s attendance at trial at Walmart’s expense; (4) in excluding OSHA regulations as evidence of negligence; and (5) in substantiallyadopting Walmart’s proposed jury instructions and in substantially adopting Walmart’s submitted verdict form.

1 On January 3, 2019, the parties consented to conduct all further proceedings in front of a United States Magistrate Judge.

2 The Omnibus Order also denied Tabarestani’s motion to conduct interviews with jurors and granted Walmart’s motion to tax costs. These rulings are not at issue on appeal. USCA11 Case: 20-13621 Date Filed: 03/24/2022 Page: 2 of 320

- 13621 Opinion of the Court 3
After review, we conclude Tabarestani’s arguments are meritless and affirm for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s thorough and well

- reasoned Omnibus Order of August 29, 2020 . We note as to his fraud claim
, Tabarestani contends that a Walmart security video that he introduced into evidence at trial was fraudulent and does not show him, but rather some other unidentified person
, falling in the snow at the Sam’s Club loading dock on January 7, 2018. As the mag istrate judge reasoned,the jury was charged with finding the facts based on their assessment of the evidence, including the credibility of witnesses

. Tabarestani claimed at trial that he was not shown in the video, but the jury rejected that argument. A s the district court stated, Tabarestani has shown “no clear and convincing evid ence of fraud or fraud on the court.”
AFFIRMED. USCA11 Case: 20-13621 Date Filed: 03/24/2022 Page: 3 of 3
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Gregory  Rotelli,  hereby  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Rostock Ventures Corp. for the
          period ended March 31, 2015 (the "Report") fully complies with the
          requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
          of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of Rostock Ventures Corp.

Date: May 20, 2015

                              /s/ Gregory Rotelli
                              --------------------------------------------------
                              Gregory Rotelli
                              President, Chief Executive Officer,
                              Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer,
                              Secretary, Treasurer and Director
                              (Principal Executive Officer,
                              Principal Financial Officer
                              and Principal Accounting Officer)

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906, has been provided to Rostock Ventures Corp. and will be
retained by Rostock  Ventures Corp. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financing reporting that occurred during the registrants
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting;
and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonable likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involved management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting.
 Dated:  May 12, 2010
    DIVERSIFIED RESTAURANT HOLDINGS, INC.By:
    /s/ David G. BurkeDavid G. Burke
ATTACHMENT 1

PROPOSED FINDINGS 

PURSUANT TO HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE SECTIONS 

40001(c), 40703, 40727, 40727.2, 40728.5 and 40920.6(a) 

FOR PROPOSED REVISIONS TO RULE 74.29 

1. NECESSITY: The proposed revisions to Rule 74.29 are needed to obtain emission reductions 

necessary to move closer to the goal of meeting state and federal air quality standards. (40727) 

2. AUTHORITY: The Ventura County Air Pollution Control District is authorized and required 

by the California Health and Safety Code Division 26, Part 3, Sections 40000, 40001, and 

40914 to adopt and enforce rules and regulations to meet and maintain state and federal ambient 

air quality standards. (40727) 

3. CLARITY: These amendments can be easily understood by the persons directly affected by 

them. (40727) 

4. CONSISTENCY: These amendments are in harmony and do not conflict with or contradict 

existing statutes, court decisions, or state or federal regulations. (40727) 

5. NONDUPLICATION: The proposed rule does not impose the same requirements as an 

existing state or federal regulation. (40727) 

6. REFERENCE: California Health and Safety Code Division 26, Part 3, Section 40702 will be 

implemented by the adoption of proposed Rule 74.30. (40727) 

7. COST EFFECTIVENESS, INCREMENTAL COST-EFFECTIVENESS, AND 

SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT: Information related to the cost effectiveness, incremental costeffectiveness, and socioeconomic impact of Rule 74.29, is set forth in the attached Staff Report, 

dated February 29, 2008, and has been considered in adopting the rule.(40703-CE, 40728.5-

SEI, 40920.6(a)-ICE) 

8. ANALYSIS OF AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS: Information on existing 

regulations related to Rule 74.29 is set forth in the attached Staff Report, dated February 29, 

2008, and has been considered in adopting the rule. (40727.2) 

9. ATTAINMENT OF AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS: Ventura County has been 

designated a moderate non-attainment area for federal ozone ambient air quality standards and a 

severe state non-attainment area for ozone ambient air quality standards. Reactive Organic 

Compounds are precursors to the formation of ozone. Rule 74.29 reduces Reactive Organic 

Compounds and will help Ventura County to move closer to attainment of the state and federal 

ozone ambient air quality standards. (40001.c)
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 2, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 17, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 351 to Competitive Product List*. Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-699, CP2024-708.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22622 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P