alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Rahim Jivraj, certify that:

1.           
I have reviewed the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Mainland Resources
Inc.;

2.            
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

3.            
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4.            
I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and I have:

a)            
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

b)            
evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

c)            
disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the small business issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuers most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting.

5.            
I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal controls over
financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a)            
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b)            
any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: January 10, 2008

/s/ Rahim JivrajRahim Jivraj, President, Secretary, and
Treasurer (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MAP VI Acquisition, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, I.
      Steven Edelson, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
                13, 2007
            /s/
                I. Steven EdelsonI.
                Steven EdelsonPrincipal
                Executive Officer
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**467 KA 13-00263**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

PAUL A. COOKHORNE, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

WILLIAMS, HEINL, MOODY & BUSCHMAN, P.C., AUBURN (RYAN JAMES MULDOON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

JOSEPH V. CARDONE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, ALBION (KATHERINE BOGAN OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Orleans County Court (James P. Punch, J.), rendered November 19, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted assault in the second degree.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of attempted assault in the second degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 120.05 [3]), defendant contends that the waiver of the right to appeal is not valid and challenges the severity of the fine that was imposed as part of his sentence. Although the record establishes that defendant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived the right to appeal ( see generally People v Lopez , 6 NY3d 248, 256), we conclude that the valid waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass the challenge to the severity of the fine because County Court failed to advise defendant of the potential range of any fine that could be imposed as part of his sentence ( see generally People v Newman , 21 AD3d 1343, 1343; People v McLean , 302 AD2d 934, 934), and there was no specific promise as to the amount of a fine at the time of the waiver ( cf. People v Semple , 23 AD3d 1058, 1059, lv denied 6 NY3d 852). Nevertheless, on the merits, we reject defendant’s challenge to the severity of the fine.

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Third District Court of Appeal 

State of Florida

Opinion filed Dec. 28, 2016

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D15-460

Lower Tribunal No. 13-1049 

________________

C. Eugene Sims, II,

Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

vs.

Christine T. Sims,

Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Spencer Eig,

Judge.

Nancy A. Hass, P.A. and Nancy A. Hass (Hollywood), for appellant/crossappellee. 

The Weinger Appellate Firm and Daniel S. Weinger (Plantation), for

appellee/cross-appellant. 

Before SUAREZ, C.J., and LAGOA and SCALES, JJ. 

SUAREZ, C.J. 

C. Eugene Sims seeks to reverse a Final Judgment of dissolution of

marriage, and Christine T. Sims raises one issue on cross-appeal. We affirm
without discussion all issues raised on direct appeal and on cross-appeal. 

Canakaris v.

Canakaris, 382 So. 2d 1197 (Fla. 1980). 

Affirmed. 
2
#### GOODSON et al. v. GILMER OIL & REFINING CO.

No. 4781.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Texarkana.

Sept. 27, 1934.

Roy Starnes, of Gladewater, for appellants.

Milton Greer Mell and Gus Morris, both of Gilmer, for appellees.

SELLERS, Justice.

This appeal is from an interlocutory order appointing a receiver without notice made and entered by the district court of Upshur county, authorizing such receiver to take charge of and operate a certain refinery over which the litigation in the main suit is involved.

The petition for the receiver is signed by the attorney for the plaintiff and verified by him in the following language: “And the facts stated in the said petition are true and correct according to the information and belief of affiant.” It is well settled in this state that a petition thus verified does not authorize the appointment of a receiver without a hearing. Alto Cotton Oil & Mfg. Co. v. Berryman (Tex. Civ. App.) 218 S. W. 513; Zanes v. Lyons (Tex. Civ. App.) 86 S.W.(2d) 544.

The judgment of the trial court appointing a receiver is reversed and the cause remanded.
:::TlOFirA:3:^OHTAliON 

March 15, 2010 

The Honorable Ray LaHood 

Secretary 

United States Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, D.C. 

20590 

Subject: Haneda Combination Services Allocation Proceeding DOT-OST-2010-

0018 

Dear Secretary LaHood: 

As a dedicated travel partner of American Airlines, I am writing in support of 

American's application to provide new service from New York's John F. Kennedy 

International Airport and Los Angeles International Airport to Tokyo International 

Airport at Haneda. 

We are very fortunate to have the opportunity to apply for these slots thanks to the 

success of you and Obama administration last December in reaching a landmark 

Open Skies agreement with Japan, which opens up Haneda to service by U.S. 

airlines. 

I encourage your selection of American Airlines to provide nonstop service from 

New York and Los Angeles to Haneda in order to provide an essential connection 

between three of the world's largest financial and commerce centers. 

Recent events, including the successful preservation of Japan Airlines' oneworld 

Alliance membership, have emphasized American's strong commitment to the 

trans-Pacific market. American is likewise committed to New York and Los 

Angeles - both vital focal points of business, trade, entertainment, technology and 

education - providing unsurpassed air service since the mid-1900s. 

!3 < r\s!al Lake P!a/a Cryshil l.nkc, UVnum 60014 

Aiitncy Pl!uneS!5.45'l.2500 Fax N>imbei-Si5.459.2564 fcil SI5.;63.7433 

fviiiiiii cHr:i\c!'i/>i<»i.<.-oni Web Pajie «ww.citravciagencv.com 
^3e ^ the New York and Los Angeles metro areas will gain significant economic 

benefits from these proposed flights, as will American's customers and employees. 

However, we need your help to make the JFK & LAX/Haneda connection a reality. 

It is because of these commitments, I strongly urge you to say yes to American 

Airlines and its request for slots to fly from Kennedy and Los Angeles to Haneda. 

Sincerely, 

ake Travel Agency 

Richard W. Doherty, Jr. 

President 

13 Cnstai Lake I'la/a Crystal Lake, lliinois 600!4 

Agency Phone Si5,45y.2500 Fax Niiinber S!5.459.2564 Ceil 815.263."433 

Fniail ehra\e!« aoJ.coni VVeh Page u\4v\.r!trineiat>et!c>.c<:M(i
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 97-2596

___________ George May, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.; * Anheuser-Busch Recycling * Corporation; Busch Entertainment * Corp.; Anheuser-Busch Container * Appeal from the United States Recovery Corporation, * District Court for the * Eastern District of Missouri. Defendants-Appellees, * [UNPUBLISHED]

---------------------------- * George May, * * Plaintiff-Appellant, * * v. * * Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.; * Anheuser-Busch Recycling * Corporation; Busch Entertainment * Corp.; Busch Container Recovery * Corporation, jointly and severally, * * Defendants-Appellees. *TheH onorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for th e 1 Eastern District of Missouri. -2- ___________ Submitted: November 5, 1996 Filed: November 12, 1997

___________ Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. George May appeals from the distr ict court & s order dismissing his consolidated

1 action s alleging defendants violated state and federal law through pleadings filed in a prior action. Having carefully reviewed the records and the parties & submissions, we concl udethat dismissal was warranted and that an extended discussion would lac k precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See8th Cir. R. 47B. A true copy.

Attest:
CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Motions Dismissed; Stay Lifted; Petition for Writ of Mandamus Denied and

Memorandum Opinion filed June 18 , 2024.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14

- 23

- 00671

- CV

IN RE C&J WELL SERVICES, INC.; C&J WELL SERVICES, INC. D/B/A C&J ENERGY SERVICES; C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; NEXTIER OILFIELD SOLUTIONS, INC. F/K/A C&J ENERGY SERVICES, INC.; NEXTIER COMPLETION SOLUTIONS, INC.; BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, INC. D/B/A BES HOLDINGS CO.; BASIC ENERGY SERVICES, L.P.; BASIC ENERGY SERVICES GP, L.L.C.; AND GENARO GONZALES , Relator s

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 270th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2021

- 24324



### MEMORANDUM OPINION2

On September 11, 2023 , relator s C&J Well Services, Inc.; C&J Well Services, Inc. d/b/a C&J Energy Services; C&J Energy Services, Inc.; Nextier Oilfield Solutions, Inc. f/k/a C&J Energy Services, Inc.; Nextier Completion Solutions, Inc.; Basic Energy Services, Inc. d/b/a Bes Holdings Co., Basic Energy Services, L.P.; Basic Energy Services GP, L.L.C., and Genaro Gonzales
, filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this Court. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221;
see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator s ask this Court to compel the Honorable Dedra Davis, presiding judge of the 270th District Court of Harris County
, to vacate the trial court’s August 29, 2023 order quashing the hearings on

r elators’ motions for summary judgment, and order the trial court to rule on

r elators’ motions for summary judgment prior to trial

. Relator s ha ve not established their entitlement to mandamus relief. Accordingly, we deny relators ’ petition for a writ of mandamus. We dismiss as moot all pending motions. W e lift this C ourt’s November 14 , 202 3 order staying the underlying trial proceedings

.

PER CURIAM

Panel c onsists of Justices Jewell, Poissant, and Wilson.
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
      corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending June
      30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I,
      Tad M. Ballantyne, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that
      to
      my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.




*/s/
                Tad M. Ballantyne*Tad
                M. BallantyneChief
                Financial OfficerDate:
                August 4, 2008
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATIONS**I, G. Kregg Lunsford, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Cal Dive International, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periodspresented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter(the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.Date: February 28, 2007       /s/ G. Kregg Lunsford G. Kregg Lunsford    Executive Vice President    and Chief Financial Officer
#### M. N. NUNN, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 21116.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 3, 1940.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for injuring a person while attempting to break jail; the punishment assessed is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The appellant has filed an affidavit to dismiss this appeal, duly verified as required *1118by law. The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory J. Rizzo, President and Chief Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Spectra
Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                             
|----------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    GREGORY J.
RIZZO                                                                                                                                                                     
|                  |  |  |  | Gregory J. Rizzo President and Chief Executive Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
----

----

III Notices

Commission

----

COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY OFFICE

Call for expression of interest in the appointment as Chairperson of the Board of Appeal and his/her alternate

(2006/C 301 A/01)

The Community Plant Variety Office is seeking to appoint the Chairperson of its Board of Appeal and his/her alternate.

Applicants must be a citizen of one of the Member States of the European Union.

The Chairperson and his/her alternate shall be appointed by the Council from a list of candidates which shall be proposed by the Commission after obtaining the opinion of the Administrative Council of the Office. Information on the remuneration may be acquired on request to the secretariat of the Board of Appeal (Community Plant Variety Office, 3, boulevard Maréchal-Foch, BP 10121, F-49101 Angers Cedex 02). The Community Plant Variety Office and the Commission apply an equal opportunities policy.

Job description, application forms and instructions for sending applications can be downloaded from the Internet at the following address:

http://ec.europa.eu/food/plant/propertyrights/index_en.htm

or

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

The delay for the receipt of applications is 31 January 2007 (see details in the application instructions).

----
# Official Journal C 384/2011

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.384.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 384 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5431 December 2011 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2011.384.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 384

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5431 December 2011

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2011/C 384/01 | Euro exchange rates | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2011/C 384/01

Euro exchange rates

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
[No. 44589-8-I.

Division One.

October 23, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Thomas L. Nolan, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 98-1-02040-1, Charles S. French, J., entered February 26, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
#### Posey COLLINS v. STATE.

No. 19584.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 30, 1938.

Shropshire & Sanders, of Brady, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin. for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully driving an automobile upon the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for 90 days.

The question presented for review is the same as that discussed in the case of Schultz v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 115 S.W.2d 417, in which an opinion is this day delivered. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment in the present instance is reversed and the cause remanded.