alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3301 

To prohibit Federal funding of Planned Parenthood Federation of America. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. JOLLY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To prohibit Federal funding of Planned Parenthood 

Federation of America. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FINDINGS. 

4 Congress finds as follows: 

5 (1) State and county health departments, com6 munity health centers, hospitals, physicians offices, 

7 and other entities currently provide, and will con8 tinue to provide, health services to women. Such 

9 health services include relevant diagnostic laboratory 

10 and radiology services, well-child care, prenatal and 

11 postpartum care, immunization, family planning 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3301 IH

1 services including contraception, sexually trans2 mitted disease testing, cervical and breast cancer 

3 screenings, and referrals. 

4 (2) Many such entities provide services to all 

5 persons, regardless of the person’s ability to pay, 

6 and provide services in medically underserved areas 

7 and to medically underserved populations. 

8 (3) All funds no longer available to Planned 

9 Parenthood will continue to be made available to 

10 other eligible entities to provide women’s health care 

11 services. 

12 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION. 

13 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding any other provi14 sion of law, no Federal funds may be made available to 

15 Planned Parenthood Federation of America, or to any of 

16 its affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, or clinics. 

17 (b) RULES OF CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this Act 

18 shall be construed to— 

19 (1) affect any limitation contained in an appro20 priations Act relating to abortion; or 

21 (2) reduce overall Federal funding available in 

22 support of women’s health. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3211 

To provide for the addition of certain real property to the reservation of 

the Siletz Tribe in the State of Oregon. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2015 

Mr. SCHRADER introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To provide for the addition of certain real property to the 

reservation of the Siletz Tribe in the State of Oregon. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE; CLARIFICATION. 

4 (a) PURPOSE.—The purpose of this Act is to facili5 tate fee-to-trust applications for the Siletz Tribe within 

6 the geographic area specified in the amendment made by 

7 this Act. 

8 (b) CLARIFICATION.—Except as specifically provided 

9 otherwise by this Act or the amendment made by this Act, 

10 nothing in this Act or the amendment made by this Act, 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3211 IH

1 shall prioritize for any purpose the claims of any federally 

2 recognized Indian tribe over the claims of any other feder3 ally recognized Indian tribe. 

4 SEC. 2. TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OF THE 

5 SILETZ TRIBE OF THE STATE OF OREGON. 

6 Section 7 of the Siletz Tribe Indian Restoration Act 

7 (25 U.S.C. 711e) is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following: 

9 ‘‘(f) TREATMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY.— 

10 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.— 

11 ‘‘(A) TITLE.—The Secretary may accept 

12 title to any additional number of acres of real 

13 property located within the boundaries of the 

14 original 1855 Siletz Coast Reservation estab15 lished by Executive order dated November 9, 

16 1855, comprised of land within the political 

17 boundaries of Benton, Douglas, Lane, Lincoln, 

18 Tillamook, and Yamhill Counties in the State of 

19 Oregon, if that real property is conveyed or oth20 erwise transferred to the United States by or on 

21 behalf of the tribe. 

22 ‘‘(B) TRUST.—Land to which title is ac23 cepted by the Secretary under this paragraph 

24 shall be held in trust by the United States for 

25 the benefit of the tribe. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3211 IH

1 ‘‘(2) TREATMENT AS PART OF RESERVATION.— 

2 All real property that is taken into trust under para3 graph (1) shall— 

4 ‘‘(A) be considered and evaluated as an on5 reservation acquisition under part 151.10 of 

6 title 25, Code of Federal Regulations (or suc7 cessor regulations); and 

8 ‘‘(B) become part of the reservation of the 

9 tribe. 

10 ‘‘(3) PROHIBITION ON GAMING.—Any real prop11 erty taken into trust under paragraph (1) shall not 

12 be eligible, or used, for any gaming activity carried 

13 out under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 

14 U.S.C. 2701 et seq.).’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-7176

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus ANTHONY CLIVE REID, Defendant - Appellant.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-108, CA-99-458-7) Submitted: December 16, 1999 Decided: December 29, 1999Before MURNAGHAN and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Clive Reid, Appellant Pro Se. Sharon Burnham, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Anthony Clive Reid seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.1999). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Reid , Nos. CR-96-108; CA99-458-7 (W.D. Va. June 24, 1999). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit








AMENDMENT No. 3 TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AMENDMENT No. 3 to EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (“Amendment No. 3”), is entered into as of March 1, 2017, by and between Third Point Reinsurance Ltd., a Bermuda company (the “Company”), and Daniel Victor Malloy III (the “Executive”).


WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive entered into a certain Employment Agreement dated as of January 23, 2012, an Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 2015, and an Amendment No. 2 dated as of May 4, 2016 (the initial Employment Agreement and Amendments thereto, collectively, the “Employment Agreement”); and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Executive’s title and enlist the services and employment of the Executive on behalf of the Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. as Chief Underwriting Officer, subject to the approval of Bermuda Immigration authorities, and the Executive is willing to render such services and the Company and Executive agree to otherwise maintain the terms and conditions set forth in the Employment Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows:
1.      Section 2, Extent of Employment, sub-section (a) of the Employment Agreement shall be amended to read in its entirety as follows: 


“2(a).  Duties.  During the Employment Term, subject to the approval of Bermuda immigration authorities, the Executive shall serve as the Chief Underwriting Officer of Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd.  In his capacity as Chief Underwriting Officer, the Executive shall perform such senior executive duties, services, and responsibilities on behalf of the Company consistent with such position as may be reasonably assigned to the Executive from time to time by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company.  In performing such duties hereunder, the Executive shall report directly to the Chief Executive Officer.”
   


2.    The parties hereto agree that except as specifically set forth in this Amendment No. 3, each and every provision of the Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect as set forth therein.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Amendment No. 3 to be executed, and the Executive has hereunto set his hand, in each case to be effective as of the day and year first above written.
THIRD POINT REINSURANCE LTD.
_By:     /s/ J. Robert Bredahl
______________________________
Name:    J. Robert Bredahl
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




By:     /s/ Janice R. Weidenborner
______________________________
Name:    Janice R. Weidenborner
Title: EVP, Group General Counsel and Secretary




EXECUTIVE
/s/  Daniel Victor Malloy III 
________________________________________  
Daniel Victor Malloy III
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2013-0640 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-016-AD

Helicopter Model: Agusta Model AB139 and AW139 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 73 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to prevent a fire, structural damage, and subsequent 

loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter negligible

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the to deactivate the 

system and install a placard)

$85

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85

Total US Fleet Cost $6,205

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Andy Shaw
Health Benefits Premium Conversion (HB-PC) 

INPUT FOR FORM 5500 

for Executive Branch Agencies 

For the plan year ending on December 31, 2001 

***Fax completed form to (202) 606-7944 no later than June 1, 2002*** 

Agency: Payroll Office Number: 

Note: if your payroll functions are cross-serviced, do not complete this report; it will be 

completed for you by your cross-servicer. 

***In completing this report, it is important that you follow the instructions on the reverse*** 

1. Number of employees 

2. Number of employees eligible to participate in HB-PC 

3. Number of employees who participated in HB-PC 

4. Total FEHB withholdings and contributions for HB-PC participants $ 

5. If you cross-service the payroll functions of other Executive Branch agencies, attach a list 

of those agencies as an addendum to this report. 

Name of preparer: Telephone: 

Title of preparer: E-mail: 

Signature of preparer: Date signed: 
 

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE INPUT FOR FORM 5500 

Line 1: Number of Employees 

 Enter the total number of employees you paid on the last pay day in calendar year (CY) 2001. 

 Include ALL employees -- full-time, part-time, intermittent, etc. 

Line 2: Number of Employees Eligible to Participate in HB-PC 

 Enter the total number of employees enrolled in the FEHB Program on the last pay day in CY 

2001. Include in this number those for whom FEHB deductions were made and those for whom 

you made no FEHB deductions (e.g., those on LWOP). 

Line 3: Number of Employees who Participated in HB-PC

 Enter the sum of: 

 The number of HB-PC participants on the last pay day in CY 2001

 Plus: the number of employees with pre-tax FEHB deductions, who subsequently waived 

participation in HB-PC during CY 2001 

 Plus: the number of HB-PC participants who terminated or cancelled their FEHB 

coverage during CY 2001.

Line 4: Total FEHB Withholdings and Contributions for HB-PC Participants 

 Enter the total amount of FEHB withholdings and contributions remitted to OPM for all HB-PC 

 participants during CY 2001.
# C_2023231EN.01000601.xml

| 30.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/6

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107696

(2023/C 231/05)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 6.6.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107696 |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Dopłata do nawozów mineralnych |
| Legal basis | Par. 13zx of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa |
| ul. Poleczki 33,02-822 Warszawa |

Date of adoption of the decision

6.6.2023

Aid number

SA.107696

Member State

Poland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Dopłata do nawozów mineralnych

Legal basis

Par. 13zx of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa

ul. Poleczki 33,02-822 Warszawa

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3429 

To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to prohibit sale or 

transactions relating to human fetal tissue. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. YODER (for himself, Mr. FRANKS of Arizona, Mr. STEWART, Mr. DUFFY, 

Mr. NEUGEBAUER, Mr. SHIMKUS, Mr. JONES, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. 

MARCHANT, Mr. GOWDY, Mr. HARRIS, Mr. BABIN, Ms. JENKINS of Kansas, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. COLLINS of New York, Mr. BOUSTANY, Mr. 

PITTENGER, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. BARTON, and Mr. 

KELLY of Pennsylvania) introduced the following bill; which was referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend title IV of the Public Health Service Act to 

prohibit sale or transactions relating to human fetal tissue. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting the Life5 Ending Industry of Fetal Organ Exchange Act’’ or the 

6 ‘‘Pro-LIFE Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3429 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITING SALE OR TRANSACTIONS RELATING 

2 TO HUMAN FETAL TISSUE. 

3 Section 498B(e) of the Public Health Service Act (42 

4 U.S.C. 298g–2(e)) is amended by striking paragraph (3) 

5 and inserting the following new paragraph: 

6 ‘‘(3) The term ‘valuable consideration’ in7 cludes— 

8 ‘‘(A) any payment made or debt incurred; 

9 ‘‘(B) any gift, honorarium or recognition of 

10 value bestowed; 

11 ‘‘(C) any price, charge or fee which is 

12 waived, forgiven, reduced or indefinitely de13 layed, 

14 ‘‘(D) any loan or debt which is canceled or 

15 otherwise forgiven; 

16 ‘‘(E) the transfer of any item from one 

17 person to another or provision of any service or 

18 granting of any opportunity for which a charge 

19 is customarily made, without charge or for a re20 duced charge; and 

21 ‘‘(F) any payments associated with the 

22 transportation, implantation, processing, preser23 vation, quality control, or storage of human 

24 fetal tissue.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                Warren G. Lichtenstein                                 |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Warren                G. Lichtenstein                                     |
| Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer |
| (Principal Executive Officer)                                   |
| May 9, 2008                                                     |

----
From: Richard Parker [mailto:richardparkerdc@gmail.com] 

Sent: Friday, December 23, 2011 1:51 PM 

To: Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Bob Smith; Brenda 

Edwards; Brian Coffey; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; 

Chris Bolduc; Chris Brown; Clark Silcox; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; David Flaten; Emily 

Marchetti; Eric Petersen; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary Fernstrom; Greg Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; Hirsch, 

Bruce R; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge; Jerry Schoen; Jim Raba; Joanna 

Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P. Sampat; Matthew 

Nardotti; Maxine Savitz; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest; Millure, Dave; 

Pamela Costello; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Richard W. Parker; Rick 

Anderson; Rob Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; 

Simmons, Chuck; Steve Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Ted Johnstone; Thomas Petrosino; Tim Ballo; Tom 

Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo; Vijay Tendulkar; Thomas Patzner; Chad Kennedy; Eduardo Robles; 

Dhiru Patel 

Subject: Happy Holidays 

Dear Colleagues, 

Just a quick note to express my appreciation to each of you -- for the knowledge, 

professionalism, hard work and, most of all civility, that you all have brought to the negotiating 

table over the past several months as we have wrestled with difficult issues in an effort to reach 

consensus. Although we did not achieve consensus on liquid immersed, your courtesy and 

professionalism throughout the process was and is a model for this town (hear that, Congress?). 

I am confident that your efforts have greatly strengthened the Department's analysis and will 

improve the final rule for liquid immersed. I am hopeful that we can reach final consensus on 

MVDT and possibly even on LV early next year. 

Meanwhile, I'd like to reiterate what a pleasure it has been working with and getting to know you 

all. Best wishes for a safe and happy holiday season! 

Warm regards, 

Richard Parker
3

Attachment

Sample Agency Letter, Court Order Received Covering FEGLI & CSRS/FERS Benefits

Dear Mrs. Jane Jones:

We have received the court-certified court order you submitted directing payment of Mr. John

Jones’s Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) coverage as well as [a portion of] his

[Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) {or} Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS)]

[retirement and/{or} survivor benefits]. As the court order pertains to Mr. Jones’s FEGLI coverage,

we will keep the copy you submitted in Mr. Jones’s Official Personnel Folder as long as he is

employed with this agency.

However, in order for this court order to apply to Mr. Jones’s [CSRS {or} FERS] benefits, a courtcertified copy must also be submitted to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) at the

address below:

U.S. Office of Personnel Management

Court Ordered Benefits Branch

Post Office Box 17

Washington, DC 20044

As Mr. Jones’s [former/separated] spouse, it is your responsibility to submit the court order (or

have the court order submitted by a representative acting on your behalf) to the appropriate

office(s) to establish entitlement to benefits.

Sincerely,

[Agency Name] Personnel Office
Exhibit 15.2



May 2, 2016









Securities and Exchange Commission

100 F Street, N.E.



Washington, D.C. 20549-7561



Dear Sirs/Madams:



We have read Item 16F of Grupo Financiero Santander México,
S.A.B. de C.V.’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, and have the following comments:



| | 1. | We agree with the statements made in the second and third paragraphs.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | We agree with the statements made in the first paragraph relating to our firm, but have no basis on which to agree or disagree
with the other statements made in such paragraph.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Yours truly,





/s/ Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza, S. C.



Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited















C.P.C. Erika Regalado García
#### DRAUGHON’S BUSINESS COLLEGE et al. v. MATHIS.

No. 1663.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Waco.

June 21, 1934.

M. L. Bennett, of Normangee, for appellants.

Brownlee *&*Brownlee, of Madisonville, for appellee.

ALEXANDER, Justice.

This case is before the court on the motion of appellee to affirm on certificate because of the failure of appellants to file the transcript in this court within the time provided by law:

*550The record discloses that final judgment was entered in the trial court on the 21st day of February, 1934, and the motion for new trial overruled and notice of appeal given on the 23d day of February, 1934. The appeal *bond*was filed March 13, 1934. The appellants have wholly failed to file in this court ■a transcript of the proceedings. The time for ■filing same has expired. Under the provisions of Revised. Statutes, art. 1841, the appellee is •entitled to have the judgment of the trial court affirmed. Beaver v. Beaver (Tex. civ. App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 279.

The motion to affirm on certificate is granted, and the judgment of the trial court affirmed.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 17 (Monday, January 27, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 4336]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-01528]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

FEDERAL REGISTER CITATION OF PREVIOUS ANNOUNCEMENT: Vol. 79 No. 12, 
Friday 17, 2014, page 3182.

ANNOUNCED TIME AND DATE OF OPEN MEETING: Thursday, January 23, 2014, 
10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.

CHANGES TO OPEN MEETING: RESCHEDULED TO: Friday, January 24, 2014, 
10:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of 
the Secretary, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-
7923.

    Dated: January 23, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-01528 Filed 1-23-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```