alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WORK-LIFE

telework

U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT

1900 E Street, NW, Washington, DC 20415

Contact your local HR oce to find your agency Telework 

Coordinator or search OPM’s Work-Life Contact Tool available at:

https://www.opm.gov/CCLContact/

VS.

Telework is a strategic business tool that can increase employee engagement and 

productivity, help agencies recruit and retain top talent, reduce organizational costs, and allow 

for continuity of operations during emergencies. To achieve these benefits, telework requires 

commitment from employees, managers, and senior leaders. This infographic shatters 

common telework myths and provides tips to help build a healthy, flexible work environment.

Teleworkers are 

out of sight, out 

of mind.

telework

MYTH REALITY

With modern technology, 

teleworkers can share seamless 

communication with their oce 

and customers, at all times. 

Managers may need to shift their 

focus from monitoring employee 

visibility to the completion of work 

products. And teleworkers can 

help by ensuring managers and 

co-workers know their schedules, 

how to reach them, and how 

customers are being handled.

Managers should 

not telework.

Managers and supervisors must 

be committed to using telework to 

the fullest extent possible for 

Federal telework programs to 

succeed. Leaders who telework 

drive positive change within their 

organization's culture and can 

model successful telework 

strategies that employees are 

likely to adopt.

Federal 

teleworkers are 

typically women 

with school-aged 

children or 

millennials.

Surprise! Results of the Federal 

Employees Viewpoint Survey (FEVS) 

show that men represent a slightly 

higher percentage of teleworkers 

(51%) versus women (49%) and 

suggest that men are just as likely 

as women to seek workplace 

flexibilities to manage their work, 

family, and personal responsibilities. 

The FEVS results also reveal the 

typical Federal teleworker is a 

slightly older, non-supervisor with 

fairly stable employment tenure in 

the same agency.

People who 

telework are lazy 

and unproductive.

Research shows that teleworkers 

are more productive and less 

likely to take time o of work. 

Telework is also a flexibility that 

top performers often value. An 

agency could lose top talent by 

not having a culture supportive 

of telework.

Telework 

negatively affects 

employee and 

team morale.

Telework can improve morale by 

giving employees a greater sense 

of autonomy over how they 

complete their work. Teams 

should utilize available technology 

to keep the lines of 

communication open between 

teleworkers and non-teleworkers 

and create opportunities for 

face-to-face interactions. The 

perception that teleworkers are 

not committed to their work or 

agency can be combated by 

leadership and internal 

communications campaigns.

Visit Telework.gov/CommonMyths to learn more about breaking 

down barriers to telework in the Federal Government

MYTH REALITY

MYTH REALITY

MYTH REALITY

MYTH REALITY

MYTH REALITY
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 103 (Tuesday, May 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 31588]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13060]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

TIME AND DATE: 10:00 a.m., Friday June 15, 2012.

PLACE: 1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Enforcement Matters and a Rule 
Enforcement Review. In the event that the times or dates of these or 
any future meetings change, an announcement of the change, along with 
the new time and place of the meeting will be posted on the 
Commission's Web site at http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sauntia S. Warfield, 202-418-5084.

Sauntia S. Warfield,
Assistant Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2012-13060 Filed 5-24-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3350 Referred in Senate (RFS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3350

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 21, 2015

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To require a terrorism threat assessment regarding the transportation 
 of chemical, biological, nuclear, and radiological materials through 
United States land borders and within the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Know the CBRN Terrorism Threats to 
Transportation Act''.

SEC. 2. TERRORISM THREAT ASSESSMENT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security, acting 
through the Under Secretary of Intelligence and Analysis, shall conduct 
a terrorism threat assessment of the transportation of chemical, 
biological, nuclear, and radiological materials through United States 
land borders and within the United States.
    (b) Consultation.--In preparing the terrorism threat assessment 
required under subsection (a), the Under Secretary for Intelligence and 
Analysis shall consult with the Administrator of the Transportation 
Security Administration, the Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection, and the heads of other Federal departments and agencies, as 
appropriate, to ensure that such terrorism threat assessment is 
informed by current information about homeland security threats.
    (c) Distribution.--Upon completion of the terrorism threat 
assessment required under subsection (a), the Under Secretary for 
Intelligence and Analysis shall disseminate such terrorism threat 
assessment to Federal partners, including the Department of 
Transportation and the Department of Energy, and State and local 
partners, including the National Network of Fusion Centers.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 20, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
From: Kevin Culligan/DC/USEPA/US

To: Nathan_J._Frey@omb.eop.gov Cc: "Mancini, Dominic J." <Dominic_J._Mancini@omb.eop.gov>, Peter

Tsirigotis/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Joseph Goffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Howard Hoffman/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, RobertJ W ayland/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA , Amanda CurryBrown/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA Date: 03/26/2012 05:52 PM Subject: Webelieve this resolves the remaining issues 

### Nathan, Based on discussions we have had with DOJ, we believe that the edits highlighted in yellow will resolve the concerns re: issue #1. GHG NSPS preamble redline with edits for OMB 3 - 26_mods - reconst_hjh_03 - 26 - 12.docx 

### Wealso believe the new footnote added to chapter 5 of the RIA (also highlighted in yellow) will resolve the issue you just raised related to the mention of 2030 in the preamble.

EO 12866 EGU GHG NSPS RIA Chapter 5 Costs, Benefits, Economic, and Energy Impacts 2060_AQ91 2012_03_26v2.docx



### - Kevin
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT
LAKEVIEW

LOAN SER

VIC ING, LLC , Pla i ntiff-Appe lle e , v. SATIC OY B A Y LLC , SER IES 8952 C OLLEGE GR

EEN, De fe nda n t-Appe l la

nt,
and SAVANNAH PLAC E HOM EOW NER S’ ASSOC IATION; R

M I M ANAGEM ENT LLC , DB A R e d R oc k Fina nc ia l Se rvic e s, De fe nda n ts. No. 20-15187 D.C . No. 2:16-c v-01593-R

FB -EJY
M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da R ic ha rd F. B oulwa

re II, Distric t Judge , Pre s iding Argue d a nd Subm itte d Fe brua

ry 5, 2021 San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia 

# FIL ED
FEB 19 2021 M OLLY C. DW Y E R, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by Ninth C irc uit R

ule 36-3.B e fore : SILER , ** IKUTA, a nd NGUYEN, C irc uit Judge s. Sa tic oy B ay LLC , Se rie s 8952 C o lle g e Gre e n (Sa tic oy ) tim e ly a ppe a ls the gran t of sum

m ary judgm e n t in fa

vor of La k e vie w Loa

n Se rvic ing, LLC (Lake v ie w). The distric t

c ourt ha d jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1332, a nd we have jurisdic tion unde r 28 U.S.C . § 1291. The fore c losure sa le did not e xtinguish the first de e d of trust be c a

use M ile s B a ue r te nde re d the supe rpriority am ount to Re d R oc k. Se e Bank of Am., N

.A. v

. SFR Inv s. Pool 1, LLC (

D i amond Spur

), 134 Ne v. 604, 607 (2018). Sa tic oy argue s that M ile s B a ue r’ s pre sa l e te nde r c ould not pre s e rve the first de e d of trust be c a use the fore c losure de e d c onta ine d re c ita ls tha

t the le nde r de fa

ulte d on the hom e owne r’ s a ssoc i ation lie n , a nd the s e re c ita ls we re c onc lusive pursua nt to Ne va da R e vise d Statute s § 116.31166, subje c t only to e quita ble c onside rations. This a rgum e nt fa i ls, be c a

use a “ va lid te nde r c ure [d] [the ] de fa ult by ope ration of law

— that is, without re ga

rd to e quita

ble c onside rations.” S

a tic oy Bay LLC Se rie s 133 Mc Lare n v . Gre e n Tre e Se rv ’g LLC , 478 P.3d 376, 379 (Nev. 2020) (c le ane d up). Satic oy ’ s a

rgum e n ts tha

t Gre e n Tre e Se rv ic ing

wa s wrongly

de c ide d a

re
m e ritle s s, be c a

use we are bound by

the de c isions of the

sta te supre m e c ourt

* * The Honora

ble Euge ne E. Sile r, Unite d State s C irc uit Judgefor the U.S. C ourt of Appe a l s for the Sixth C irc uit, sitting by de signa t ion. 2re ga

rding sta t e la w. Se e Zadrozny

v . Bank of N .Y. Me llon , 720 F.3d 1163, 1169 (9th C ir. 2013). M ile s B a ue r wa s a lso not obliga

te d to re c ord its te nde r, se e Diamond Spur , 134 Ne v. at 610, a nd e ve n if Satic oy

we re a bona fide purc ha se r,
suc h sta tus is irre le va

nt be c a use “ a fte r a

va lid te nde r of the supe rpriority portion of
an HOA lie n, a

fore c losure sa le on the e ntire lie n is void a s to the supe rpriority portion,” id. at 612. AFFIRM E D.

3
#### BULL-STEWART EQUIPMENT CO. v. MYERS.

No. 3471.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Feb. 4, 1937.

Rehearing Denied March 11,1937.

Fahey & Cooper, of Houston (Frank G. Dyer, of Houston, of counsel), for appellant.

Allen, Helm & Jacobs, all of Houston (W. S. Jacobs, Jr., of Houston, of counsel), for appellee.

HIGGINS, Justice.

This suit was brought by Myers to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in a collision between a car in which he was riding as guest and a truck owned by appellant and driven by its employee in the course of the employee’s employment. Upon special issues the defendant was found guilty of actionable negligence and his damages assessed as follows:

> (1) For time lost up to the date of the trial, $441.24.

> (2) As the present cash value of such sum or sums of money as the plaintiff Myers would in reasonable probability lose in the future because of diminished capacity to work and earn money in the future as a direct result of his injuries, the jury assessed $5,000.

> (3) For physical and mental pain to the date of trial nothing was allowed.

> (4) For physical and mental pain in the future nothing was allowed.

> (5) For doctor’s service $200 was allowed.

> (6) For hospital services $51.30 was allowed.

Appellant complains of the failure of the court to define the phrase “present cash value” as used in the issue relating to diminished capacity to work and earn money in the future.

*242It was not necessary to define the same. It was so held in Houston B. & T. R. Co. v. Davis (Tex.Civ.App.) 19 S.W.(2d) 77, in which a writ of error was refused.

It is also insisted the evidence is insufficient to show any diminished future earning capacity, and in any event the award of $5,000 therefor is excessive, and so much so as to show passion and prejudice on the part of the jury in awarding such sum.

The testimony has been examined, and it -was amply sufficient to raise the issue. It may be the sum awarded was liberal, but there is nothing to indicate the jury was prompted in so doing by passion or prejudice. The evidence plainly shows the plaintiff was seriously and painfully injured, and still suffers pain in his head, chest, and lower back. The evidence would have supported the award of substantial damages for past and future pain, but no damages therefor were allowed. This would indicate the jury, was not prompted by passion or prejudice in the award of $5,000 damages for diminished earning capacity. As heretofore stated, it may be the sum awarded as such damages is perhaps liberal, but it cannot be regarded as showing passion or prejudice, nor even so excessive as to require a remit-titur.

The finding upon the issue will not be disturbed.

Affirmed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 4, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce L. Hartman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Bruce L. Hartman   
|Bruce L. Hartman       
|Chief Financial Officer
|August 13, 2009        



40
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS

No. 112,658

In the Matter of L OUIS M. C LOTHIER
,

Respondent.

ORDER OF DISCHARGE FROM PROBATION

On March 6 , 2015 , the cour t ordered the respondent, Louis M. Clothier

, be placed
on probation for a period of three years. See In re Clothier, 30 1 Kan. 567, 344 P.3d 370
(2015 ).

On April 18, 2018 , t he respondent filed a motion for discharge from probation,
along with affidavits demonstrating compliance with the terms of probation.

On April 19 , 2018, t he Disciplinary Administrator filed a response, confirm ing

that the respondent fully complied with the conditions imposed upon him by the court
and offering no objection to the respondent being discharged from probation.

This c ourt, having reviewed the m otion, the affidavits, and the recommendation of
the Disciplinary Administrator, grants the respondent's motion for discharge from
probation.

I T I S T HEREFORE O RDERED that the respondent is hereby discharged from
probation and from any further obligation in this matter and this proceeding is closed.2

I T I S F URTHER O RDERED that this order shall be published in the Kansas Reports
and that the costs herein shall be assessed to the respondent.

Dated this 1 st day of May , 2018

.
EX-31 Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications.


I, David Nass, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D
required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on
Form 10-K of the UBS-Barclays Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C2 (the "Exchange Act
periodic reports");

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of
the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered
by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in
this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in
the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their
obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for
asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment
of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required
to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB
and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to
this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material
instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in
this report on Form 10-K.

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CWCapital Asset Management
LLC, as Special Servicer, Pentalpha Surveillance LLC, as Operating Advisor, U.S. Bank
National Association, as Trustee, Certificate Administrator and Custodian, CoreLogic
Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, and National
Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant.

Dated: March 27, 2015

/s/ David Nass

David Nass
President and Chief Executive Officer
(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
Exhibit 13.1



CERTIFICATION



The certification
set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de
C.V. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b)
or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title
18 of the United States Code. Hector Grisi Checa, the Executive President and Chief Executive Officer of Grupo Financiero Santander
México, S.A.B. de C.V., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:



| | 1. | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V.
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Date: April 28, 2017



| | /s/ Hector Grisi Checa                                     
| | -----------------------------------------------------------
| | Name:    Hector Grisi Checa                                
| | Title:      Executive President and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Maxco, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Max A. Coon, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 13, 2004

                                                  /s/ Max A. Coon
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  Max A. Coon
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Civil Service Federal Employees Federal Employees Federal Employees Retirement Group Life Health Benefits Retirement System Insurance Program System 

United States        Office of  Personnel Management The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency  

 Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter                                                     Number: 01-302                                                                     Date:  January 3, 2001  

 Subject:  General Ledger Posting of Employee Contributions    As you know, OMB Bulletin No. 01-02, “Audit Requirements for Federal Financial Statements,” requires auditors to perform certain agreed-upon-procedures to assist us in assessing the reasonableness of Retirement, Health Benefits, and Life Insurance withholdings and contributions.  Procedure number 2 states that agencies should post employee contributions for Retirement, Health Benefits, and Life Insurance to Standard General Ledger (SGL) account 6400N.  This is NOT correct -- employee contributions for Retirement, Health Benefits, and Life Insurance should be included in the charge to SGL account 6100N.    We attempted to ensure that all agency Offices of the Inspector General were aware of this error, but were not entirely successful.  As a consequence, some auditors have reported to us the entirely proper posting of employee contributions to SGL account 6100N as a departure from requirements.  We will disregard any such reporting we receive.  If you need assistance in convincing your auditors that your are correct in posting your employee contributions for Retirement, Health Benefits, and Life Insurance to SGL account 6100N, please share this letter with them or have them call us on 202-606-0606.  The error, which was typographical, was entirely our fault, not OMB’s, and we sincerely regret any concern or inconvenience that it may have or will cause you. 

        Robert A. Yuran     `   Chief, Financial Policy Staff