alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Jesse HOOPER, Appellant, v. L. W. WOMACK et al., Appellees.

No. 3532.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Oct. 5, 1939.

Davis, Avery & Wallace, of Center, for appellant.

Sanders & McLeroy, of Center, for ap-pellees.

COMBS, Justice.

This suit for $286 originated in the County Court of Shelby County. We have examined the record and find no reversible error. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed without written opinion. See Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex. Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.

Judgment affirmed.
1

Medina, Dayana

From: Pettyjohn, Mary <PETTYJOHN@adeq.state.ar.us>

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:23 PM

To: Medina, Dayana

Subject: FW: Revised BART FFA for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. - Lake Catherine Unit 4

Attachments: Revised FFA - Entergy Lake Catherine 06-25-13.pdf; Response to R6 Comments - Lake Catherine FFA - 

6-25-13.pdf

Hi Dayana,

Please see below.

Thank you,

Mary

From: Triplett, David [mailto:dtripl1@entergy.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 2:19 PM 

To: Pettyjohn, Mary 

Cc: McQueen, Kelly; JOHNSON, GEORGE; HANTZ, JOSEPH; GLOVER, MYRA H; GUNN, TOMMY REID; Chad Wood 

Subject: Revised BART FFA for Entergy Arkansas, Inc. - Lake Catherine Unit 4 

Mary, 

Please find attached a revised Five Factor Analysis (FFA) submitted for Unit 4 located at the Entergy Arkansas, Inc. – 

Lake Catherine Plant. This revised FFA is submitted to incorporate changes made in response to questions received 

from EPA Region 6 regarding the March 2013 FFA. In addition to the revised FFA, I have also attached a second 

document in which Entergy responds to each specific comment from EPA Region 6. 

A hard copy containing both documents as a single submittal will be forwarded to ADEQ this week. 

Should you have any questions regarding this information, please let me know.

David Triplett, P.E.

Air Lead, Arkansas Environmental Support

Entergy Services, Inc.

(501) 377-4030 (office) | (501) 650-1752 (cell) | (281) 297-6126 (fax)
#### HANLAN v. STATE.

No. 14103.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 25, 1931.

James W. Witherspoon and John A. Coffee, both of Hereford, 'for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

Appellant’s motion for new trial was overruled on August 28, 1930, and 80 days after adjournment of court given in which to file statement of facts and bills of exception. Court adjourned on August 29th. All bills of exception were filed on November 18th. The state’s attorney calls it to our attention that this was 81 days after court adjourned, and 82 days after notice of appeal. See article 760, C. C. P. In the absence of a further extension order, the bills of exception were filed too late and may not be considered. The statement of facts was filed within 90 days, and under said article 760 may be considered.

Officers found in appellant’s house a quantity of whisky in pint bottles and half-gallon jars; also a bottle capper and a ten-gallon, keg ; also more than 100 empty bottles, some described as “beer bottles,” others as “flat bottles” or flasks.

The evidence supports the verdict, and the judgment is affirmed.
# Official Journal C 272A/3 Au

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 272A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 613 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 272A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 613 August 2018

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | Single Resolution Board |
| 2018/C 272 A/01 | Public call for expressions of interest in the appointment as alternate to the Appeal Panel of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) (SRB/2018/001) | 1 |

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

Single Resolution Board

2018/C 272 A/01

Public call for expressions of interest in the appointment as alternate to the Appeal Panel of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) (SRB/2018/001)

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
​

 

Exhibit 32.1​

Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (the “Registrant”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Robert T. Ladd, the Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

​

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

​

/s/ Robert T. Ladd

​

Name:

Robert T. Ladd

​

Date:

March 2, 2020

​

 

152

---
#### J. B. LADD v. STATE.

No. 17681.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 27, 1935.

Howard Martin, of Gladewater, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

This cause is one pending upon the dockets of this court wherein the accused is charged with the possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the prosecution being under the Dean Law (Pen.Code 1925, art. 666 et seq., as amended). Following what has been said by us in an opinion this day handed down in Guy Meadows v. State, 88 S.W.(2d) 481, the motion for rehearing is granted, the judgment of affirmance is set aside, the opinion rendered is withdrawn, and the judgment is now reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
#### In the Matter of the Estate of William Stock, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

March 5, 1958.

*653
      *Thomas A. Stilly*for Chase Manhattan Bank, petitioner.

*Theobald J. Dengler*and *James W. Scott*for Heinrich G. Stock and others, respondents.

*Paul W. Williams, United States Attorney,*for William P. Rogers, Attorney General of the United States, respondent.

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The notice of appearance for Heinrich Gerhard Stock, Hermáne Bouxhein and Aenne Hahn, nephew and nieces of the testator and of the distributees of Willy Stock, a nephew of testator who died after the death of the life beneficiary, is stricken from the record and the objections filed on their behalf are dismissed. The Attorney General of the United States by a duly issued vesting order vested all the interest of the above-named nieces and nephew in the remainder of the trust. Whether their remainders are considered vested or contingent, the vesting order vested in the Attorney General every interest of these parties in the trust. The court has no alternative except to direct that the interest of these remainder-men under the trust be paid over to the Attorney General. *(Matter of Bendheim,*124 Misc. 424, affd. 214 App. Div. 716; *Matter of Carrington,*195 Misc. 442.) The distributees of Willy Stock have no interest in the proceeding. He survived the life beneficiary and his interest in the estate became vested on the death of the life beneficiary. As his interest was vested by the Attorney General, his estate likewise has no interest in the remainder. The 1954 Treaty of Friendship, Commerce and Navigation is prospective in its operation, deals with future relations and does not affect the title of property already vested by the Attorney General.

Submit decree on notice directing the payment of the shares in question to the Attorney General and settling the account.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 September 8, 2020

b0831

Order 

Clerk

September 8, 2020

160694

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 160694

COA: 350731

Eaton CC: 2017-020313-FC

NATHANIEL MARCELIOUS-ANTONIO

BOWERS,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2019 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
### F OR P UBLICATION



## UNIT E D ST AT E S CO URT O F APPE AL S FO R T H E NINT H CIRCUIT

I N T H E 

### M A T T E R O F 

### : S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I N G 

### L I M I T E D 

### P A R

TN E R S H I P 

### , Debtor ,

F I R S T 

### S O U T H E R

N 

### N A T I ON

A L 

### B A N K 

### , Plaintiff-Appellant ,

v
. S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I

N G 

### L I M I T E D 

### P A R TN E R S H I P 

### , Defendant-Appellee. N o. 12-17241
D.C. No. 2:11-cv-02579- HRH

I N T H E 

### M A T T E R O F 

### : S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I N G 

### L I M I T E D 

### P A R

TN E R S H I P 

### , Debtor ,

S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I

N G 

### L I M I T E D 

### P A R TN E R S H I P 

### , Plaintiff-Appellant ,

v
. F I R S T 

### S O U T H E R

N 

### N A T I ON

A L 

### B A N K 

### , Defendant-Appellee. N o. 12-17327
D.C. No. 2:11-cv-02579- HRH

### I

N T H E 

### M A T T E R O F 

### S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I

N G 

### 2

I N T H E 

### M A T T E R O F 

### : S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I N G 

### L I M I T E D 

### P A R

TN E R S H I P 

### , Debtor ,

F I R S T 

### S O U T H E R

N 

### N A T I ON

A L 

### B A N K 

### , Plaintiff-Appellant ,

v
. S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I

N G 

### L P, Defendant-Appellee. N o. 13-16164
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02700- HRH

I N T H E 

### M A T T E R O F 

### : S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I N G 

### L I M I T E D 

### P A R

TN E R S H I P 

### , Debtor ,

S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I

N G 

### L P, Plaintiff-Appellant ,

v
. F I R S T 

### S O U T H E R

N 

### N A T I ON

A L 

### B A N K 

### , Defendant-Appellee. N o. 13-16180
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02700- HRH

ORDER

F iled April 21, 2016

B efore: Alex Koz inski, Richard A. Paez , a nd Richard R. Clifton, Circuit J udg es.

### I

N T H E 

### M A T T E R O F 

### S U N N Y S L O P E 

### H O U S I

N G 

### 3
ORDER
The slip o pinion filed on April 8, 2016, is h e r e b y amended as follows:
1. O n pag e 6 of the slip o p i nion, line 4, c hang e <section 1325(a)(5)(B ) of the Code> to <section 1129(b) of the Code>.
2. On pag e 11 of the slip opinion, lines 6–7, chang e <11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B )> to <11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)>.
3. On pag e 25 of the slip opinion, lines 1–7, chang e <Under section 1325(a)(5) of the Code, a plan’s treatment o f
a secured claim can be confirmed if one of three c ondi t i o ns is satisfied: the creditor ac c e p t s the plan, the debtor surrenders the property , or the debtor invokes the cram down power. Rash , 520 U.S. at 957.> to <Under section 1 1 29(b) o f the Code, a plan can be confirmed even w i thout the consent of all impaired classes of creditors if the debtor inv o kes the cram down power.>.
W ith these amendments, the petition for panel rehearing is DENIED as moot. F u ture petitions f or panel rehearing a

nd rehearing en banc may be filed from this Order.
Exhibit 32.1.2

CERTIFICATION

I, W. W.
Boisture, Jr., principal executive officer of Hawker Beechcraft Notes Company (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 27, 1010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ W. W. Boisture, Jr.                     
|W. W. Boisture, Jr., Chief Executive Officer
|(Principal Executive Officer)               

August 3, 2010
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                         (1,874)
<SECURITIES>                                 2,086,032
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           4,277
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (3,908)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,356,760
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,317
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           335
<OTHER-SE>                                     400,725
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,356,760
<SALES>                                          8,188
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,864
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               138,429
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,045
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 56,390
<INCOME-TAX>                                     7,332
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             49,058
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    49,058
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.46
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.46
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 15.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM



We have issued our report dated June 15, 2012 with respect to
the consolidated financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2012 in the Annual Report of Amira Nature Foods Ltd. on Form
20-F for the year ended March 31, 2014. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said report in the Registration
Statements of Amira Nature Foods Ltd. on Form S-8 (File No. 333-184408).



|/s/ Grant Thornton India LLP
|----------------------------
|Gurgaon, India              
|July 28, 2014
| Exhibit      32.0 |
|-------------------|

| 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company      as of and for the period covered by thisReport. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | By:    | /s/ Thomas F.      Gibney                       |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Thomas      F. Gibney                           |
|   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer      |
|   |   | May      15, 2008                               |
|   |   |                                            |
|   |   |                                            |
|   |   |                                            |
|   |   |                                            |
|   | By:    | /s/ Stephen W.      Dederick                    |
|   |   | Stephen      W. Dederick                        |
|   |   | Vice      President and Chief Financial Officer |
|   |   | May      15, 2008                               |
Date 3/14/2013 Page of 

POST FOCUS EXPOSURE REPORT 

Summary Page 

Updated based on Post-Focus Draft Revision1, 3/14/2013, 

Test Data Review Engineering Report. 

Chemical ID: P-13-0131 Reviewer: Tobias 

Endpoints-Assessed Table 

Reasons for not assessing releases 

Endpoints/Assessment 

Cycles1

Releases 

Assessed 

in 

NCEM2? 

No XB 

Testing 

Required 

No 

Hazard 

Concern 

No 

Releases 

Release 

Below 

Acute 

Threshold5

Release 

Below 

Chronic 

Threshold5

Other 

Ingestion 

 Surface water 

 Ground water (landfill) 

 Consumer Use: DtD2

Inhalation 

 Air: incineration (stack) 

 Air: fugitive 

 Consumer Use: CEM3 

Dermal 

 Consumer Use: CEM 

Eco 

 Surface water: ADR 

conc and/or PDM4

 

 Consumer Use: DtD 1

Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model. 2

Down-the-Drain 

3

Consumer Exposure Model 

4

Probabilistic Dilution Model 

5

The threshold values for assessing endpoints are and
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION





The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the annual report of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V. on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Report”) for the purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.  Pedro José Moreno Cantalejo, the Vice President of Administration and Finance (Principal Financial Officer) of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V., certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





1.
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and





2.
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Grupo Financiero Santander México, S.A.B. de C.V.





Date: April 29, 2014




/s/ Pedro José Moreno CantalejoName: Pedro José Moreno CantalejoVice President of Administration and Finance (Principal Financial Officer)
Exhibit 35.1

SERVICING COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Santander Drive Auto Receivables Trust 2012-4 for the fiscal year ending
December 31, 2015 (the Report), the undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Santander Consumer USA Inc. (the Servicer), does hereby certify and represent that:



| | 1. | A review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2012, among Santander Drive Auto Receivables LLC, Santander Consumer USA Inc., Santander Drive
Auto Receivables Trust 2012-4 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (the Agreement) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my supervision.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



SANTANDER CONSUMER USA INC./s/ Jennifer M. DavisName:

Jennifer M. DavisTitle:

Deputy Chief Financial OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016/s/ Rich MorrinName:

Rich MorrinTitle:

Chief Operating OfficerDate:

March 29, 2016
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6214

CLARENCE RICHARD STRICKLAND; JOHN AUGUSTUS

HALL,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

and

WILLIAM BARRY DORSEY; TROY ANTHONY SMITH,

Plaintiffs,

versus

S. RICHARD WITKOWSKI; DONALD F. DEASE; MICHAEL

MOORE; CHARLES MOLONY CONDON,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-97-238-6-20)

Submitted: September 10, 1998 Decided: September 23, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Clarence Richard Strickland, John Augustus Hall, Appellants Pro Se.

Andrew Frederick Lindemann, DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A.,

Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
* We deny Appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal.

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court’s orders denying

relief on their 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) complaint, and their motion for reconsideration of the same. We have

reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the

magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court, but

modify to reflect a dismissal without prejudice.* Strickland v.

Witkowski, No. CA-97-238-6-20 (D.S.C. Aug. 4, 1997; Jan. 20, 1998).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2016 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward J. Giordano, as Interim Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. /s/ Edward J. Giordano Name: Edward J. Giordano Title: Interim Chief Financial Officer Date: March 10, 2017
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: THE PETITION OF LAW STUDENTS FOR EQUITABLE
RESPONSES TO COVID

- 19 BY RYAN
ALOYSIUS SMITH AND PRETTY MARTINEZ, TRUSTEES AD LITEM; ROBERT SUITE, MARY BETH KUZNIK, BRANDON VANTINE, ROBERT GAVIN, CHRISTIAN WOLGEMUTH, JESSICA MCDERMOTT, RAVEN MOORE, DEREK DEMERI, CATHERINE CUFF, MICHELLE TABACH, KARLA PISARCIK, CAROLINE ROBELEN, KARLI STUDY :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 74 WM 2020

Petition for Review Under the
Court’s Exclusive Jurisdiction and for Extraordinary Relief under the Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction

O RDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10 th day of September , 2020

, Petitioner s ’ Application for Leave to

File Reply Brief is GRANTED , and their Petition for Review u nder the Court’s Exclusive

Jurisdictio n and for Extraordinary Relief u nder the Court’s King’s Bench Jurisdiction is

DENIED

. Respondent’s Application for Leave to File Post

- Submission Communication is

DENIED as moot.