alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Michael J. Newport, the Chief Executive Officer and William D. Thomas, the Chief Financial Officer, of Mainland Resources Inc. (the "Company"), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| | /s/ Michael J. NewportMichael J. NewportChief Executive Officer 
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:  July 15, 2011
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | /s/ William D. ThomasWilliam D. ThomasChief Financial Officer 
(Principal Financial Officer)
Date:  July 15, 2011  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Mainland Resources Inc. and will be retained by Mainland Resources Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification**

**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of DJO Finance LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 2, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 13, 2011 (the “Report”), I, Vickie L. Capps, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(i)                                    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(ii)                                 The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Date:   May 16, 2011                                         |   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                              |   |
| /s/   VICKIE L. CAPPS                                             |   |
| Vickie   L. Capps                                                 |   |
| Executive   Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |   |

 

----
#### YOUNG v. STATE.

No. 19137.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1937.

*283Rowell & Rowell, of Jefferson, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Robbery with firearms is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The indictment appears regular and properly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception. No error has been perceived or'pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.
#### BLANK v. STATE.

No. 18962.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 2, 1937.

W. J. Cunningham and W. E. Martin, both of Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of malt liquor containing alcohol in excess of one-half of one per cent, of volume; penalty assessed at a fine of $100 and ,confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days.

The information is insufficient to charge an offense under the authority of Whitmire v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 742, holding that the information must allege that an election had been held in the particular county which resulted in the prohibition of the act charged. The principle announced has been followed in many recent cases, among them being Kelly v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W. (2d) 998; Privitt v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 204; Hardin v. State (Tex.Civ.App.) 101 S.W. (2d) 264; Pond v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 101 S.W. (2d) 247.

For the reason stated, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.
  By:
    /s/ DAVID A. VANASKEY, JR.Name:
    David A. Vanaskey, Jr.Title:
    Vice President Wilmington Trust Company
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of ZEEZOO SOFTWARE CORP. (the "Company")
on Form  10-QSB  for the  period  ended  October  31,  2007 as  filed  with  the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the  "Report"),  I,
Erickson Mercado, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C.  1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all  material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                        /s/ Erickson Mercado
                                        --------------------------
Date: December 7, 2007                  Erickson Mercado
                                        Chief Financial Officer
## In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07 - 17 - 00253 - CV IN RE BLANCA ALONZO CARRIZALES, RELATOR OPINION ON ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 

### July 31 , 2017 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and PIRTLE, JJ. Relator , Blanca Alonzo Carrizales , and real party in i nterest , Lubbock County Hospital District d/b/a University Medical Center, ha ve filed a joint motion to voluntarily dismiss this original proceeding . Without passing on the merits of relator’s petition for writ of mandamus , we grant the motion and dismiss the petition . Having dismissed the petition for writ of mandamus at relator ’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained . Per Curiam
Appendix to Annual Report
          (Graphic material ommitted electronic filing)

Page       Description of information omitted
----       -----------------------------------


22         Pie charts showing "Percent of Worldwide Sales" by
              Geographic Area



                       Percent of Worldwide Sales
                       --------------------------

                                           Asia/Pacific,
                                           Canada, Latin and
                        U.S.      Europe   South America
                     --------    --------   ---------------
            1995         46%       33%       21%
            1994         50%       31%       19%



23             Bar graph showing "Profit from Operations" from 1991-1995.

               Year     Profit from Operations
               ----     ----------------------
               1991      $247
               1992      $214
               1993      $141 *
               1994      $200
               1995      $ 89 **

                * Excludes impact of $44 million of charges related to
                  restructuring and other expenses.

                * Excludes impact of $247 million of charges related to
                  restructuring and other expenses.



26             Two bar graphs showing "Cash and Cash
               Equivalents and Short-Term Investments" and "Capital
               Expenditures/Depreciation" from 1991-1995.

                        Cash and Cash Equivalents
               Year     and Short-Term Investments
               ----     -------------------------
               1991      $245
               1992      $190
               1993      $139
               1994      $229
               1995      $ 83


                        Capital
               Year     Expenditures         Depreciation
               -----    -------------        --------------
               1991       $176               $ 86
               1992       $202               $ 89
               1993       $166               $100
               1994       $147               $118
               1995       $168               $133
P. 1


# OAR Box 1830 Prepped byOllie Stewart



### Document

Number: 

# 56 ) IV-C-2

2 Docket Number: 

# A-87-1 1

Printed 11/13/20087:20:53 AM Sheet 56 of 232P. 2

^ t0SU % 

# ff-87-i- i TX-C-^7 - * UNITE D STATE S ENVIRONMENTA LPROTECTIO NAGENC Y i N» 7 g UNITE D STATE S EJNV1KUINMfcl N1A Lfitu l \-V^r y WASHINGTON, D.C . 2046 0 S 

## " ^ ftt JAN 

## I 9 198 8 -«^-;K r
OFFIC E O F AI RAN D RADIATIO N
Honorabl e Walte r B . Jone s Hous e o f Representative s Washington , D . C . 2051 5 Dea r Mr . Jones : Thi s i n respons e t o you r January4 , 1988 , lette r relaying the concern s o f you r constituent s regarding EPA' s regulatory proposa l t o requir e onboar d canister s o n ne wvehicle s t o contro l refueling emissions . T o assis t yo u wit hyou r response , I hav e enclosed , a cop yo f ou r proposa l fo r you r review . - | Sectio n E (page s 31177-31182 ) explain s EPA' s overal l rational e - | fo r proposing onboar d controls . I f yo u woul d lik e furthe r ~ detail s o f ou r analysis , pleas e contac t Mr . Phili p Carlso n o f the Standard s Developmen t an d Suppor t Branc ho f the Emissio n Contro l Technolog

yDivision , 256 5 Plymout hRoad , Ann Arbor , M I 4810 5 (FT S 374-827 0 o r Commercia l (313 ) 668-4270) . Your lette r wil l be place d in ou r publi c docke t an d wil l be considere d in the nex t phas e o f ou r rulemaking process . 

### Sincerel y yours , ORIGINAL " SIGNE D B Y ;-;tCHAR D D.WILSO N Richar d D . Wilso n Director , Offic e o f Mobil e Source s Enclosur e c c : Dockefc#«"r87-l l
Civil Service 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Employees’ 

Group Life 

Insurance Program 

Federal Employees 

Health Benefits 

Program 

Federal Employees 

Retirement 

System 

Federal Long 

Term Care 

 Insurance 

Program 

United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Retirement and Insurance Service 

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 02-204 Date: April 23, 2002 

Subject: Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program: Opportunity for 

Enrollees of Health Plan of Nevada, Enrollment Code NM, to Change 

Enrollment 

Health Plan of Nevada (enrollment code NM) recently notified us of a serious problem with their 

provider network. The plan had a significant reduction in its provider network and anticipates 

more substantial reductions. 

We are authorizing enrollees who are affected by the network disruption to select a new health 

plan. The opportunity to change enrollment will begin immediately and continue through 

May 18, 2002. Agencies may apply the cutoff date liberally as necessary. The effective date of 

all enrollment changes will be the first day of the pay period following the one in which an 

enrollee makes the change. 

Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. 

 

 Abby L. Block 

 Associate Director 

 For Insurance Programs
#### SKINNER v. STATE.

No. 16743.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 18, 1934.

Morrow & Clarke, of Hillsboro, for appellant.

*591Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for tlie State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is assault with intent to murder ; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
---

Exhibit: 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Aom Minerals Ltd.,(the
  "Company") on 10QSB/A for the period ending May 31, 2007, as filed with the
  Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Brennan
  Wood , Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
  that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

The Report fully complies with the requirements
  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.

Date: August 20, 2007.

/s/ Brennan
Wood Brennan Wood

Chief Financial Officer

  (Title)

---
EXHIBIT 23b

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
333-105704 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 27, 2007, which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs for the adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158, EMPLOYERS' ACCOUNTING FOR
DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT PLANS and Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation No. 47, ACCOUNTING FOR CONDITIONAL ASSET
RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS, appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of PSEG
Power LLC for the year ended December 31, 2006.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
February 27, 2007
#### In the Matter of Geal Realty Corp., Petitioner, against United Lakeland Air Conditioning Co., Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Westchester County,

February 4, 1958.

*Duclcer $ Feldman*for petitioner.

*Sylvain Segal, Jr.,*for respondent.

James W. Batley, J.

This is an application for an order to discharge a mechanic’s lien upon the ground that the property is not sufficiently described in the notice of lien. The notice of lien was filed October 28, 1957, and describes the property situated as follows: “in the Town of Yorktown, County of "Westchester, State of New York and is located on the East side of Crompound Street, also known as Route 132, between Routes 6 and 202 and commonly described as ‘ Georgian Estates ’ ”. The owner of the property when the lien was filed *275and as stated in the lien was *“*Alge Realty Corp.”. The said owner conveyed the premises to the petitioner herein by deed dated November 8,1957.

The Lien Law (§ 9) requires that the notice of lien shall state the property subject to the lien, “with a description thereof sufficient for identification ’ ’; and section 23 of the statute provides that the law “is to be construed liberally to secure the beneficial interests and purposes thereof. ’ ’ All that is required is a description which identifies the property and a substantial compliance with the provisions of the statute is sufficient to provide jurisdiction to the courts to enforce it. *(Fries*v. *Bray,*279 App. Div. 8; *Jannotta*v. *Noslac Realty Corp.,*231 App. Div. 864.)

The description in the deed by which petitioner acquired the property is included in the petition herein and describes the property as situate in the town of Yorktown, Westchester County, “ as shown on a certain entitled map of Georgian Estates # * * and filed in the office of the County Clerk, Division of Land Records on July 6,1956.”

It appears from the foregoing that there has been a substantial compliance with the requirements of the statute and that the property is readily identifiable by the description contained in the notice of lien.

The application is denied.
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly
report of Wilhelmina International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Mark E. Schwarz, Principal
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
  and





2.
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





May
      20, 2009
            
            /s/
      Mark E. SchwarzName:
            Mark
      E. SchwarzTitle:
            Chief
      Executive Officer and
              Chairman
      of the Board
              (Principal
      Executive Officer)
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

ALVIN S. KANOFSKY,

Petitioner

v.

CITY OF BETHLEHEM,

Respondent

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 438 MAL 2018

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
fprx-ex103_298.htm



CONFIDENTIAL

 

Exhibit 10.3

Amendment No. 2 to the Executive Severance Benefits Agreement

This Amendment No. 2 to the Executive Severance Benefits Agreement (this “Amendment”), effective January 1, 2018 (the “Amendment Effective Date”), is made and entered into by and between Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FivePrime”), and Aron Knickerbocker, an individual (“Executive”).  

Background

A.FivePrime and Executive are parties to the Executive Severance Benefits Agreement, dated December 30, 2009, as amended (the “Agreement”).  

B.FivePrime and Executive desire to amend the Agreement, in accordance with Section 7.7 of the Agreement. 

Now, therefore, FivePrime and Executive agree as follows:

1.Amendment of the Agreement. FivePrime and Executive agree to amend the terms of the Agreement as provided below, effective as of the Amendment Effective Date.  Where the Agreement is not explicitly amended, the terms of the Agreement will remain in full force and effect.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment that are not otherwise defined herein shall have the same meanings as such terms are given in the Agreement.  

2.Title of Executive. Section 1.1 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as set forth below:

“The Company desires to employ Executive, or to continue Executive’s employment, in the position of President and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive wishes to be employed, or continue to be employed, by the Company in such position.”

3.Change in Control Severance Period. Section 6.5 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as set forth below:

““Change in Control Severance Period” means the period of twenty-four (24) months commencing on the Termination Date.”

4.Covered Termination Severance Period. Section 6.11 of the Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety as set forth below:

““Covered Termination Severance Period” means the period of twelve (12) months commencing on the Termination Date.”

1



CONFIDENTIAL

 

5.Miscellaneous.

5.1Full Force and Effect.  This Amendment amends the terms of the Agreement and is deemed incorporated into the Agreement.  The provisions of the Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, remain in full force and effect.

5.2Entire Agreement.  The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, sets forth the entire understanding of FivePrime and Executive relating to the subject matter thereof and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings between FivePrime and Executive relating to the subject matter thereof.

In Witness Whereof, FivePrime and Executive have executed this Amendment as of the Amendment Effective Date.

 


	
Five Prime Therapeutics, Inc.
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
/s/ Lewis T. Williams
	
 
	
/s/ Aron Knickerbocker

	
Lewis T. Williams
	
 
	
Aron Knickerbocker

	
President and Chief Executive Officer
	
 
	
 




 

2
Exhibit 23b

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-155732 on Form S-3 of our report dated February 25, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements and consolidated financial statement
schedule of Public Service Electric and Gas Company and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes explanatory paragraphs for the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157,Fair Value Measurementseffective January 1, 2008,and Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48,Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109effective January 1, 2007) appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Public Service Electric and Gas Company
for the year ended December 31, 2008.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Parsippany, New JerseyFebruary 25, 2009

---
#### GRIFFIN v. STATE.

No. 21012.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 10, 1940.

R. F. Peden, of Houston, for appellant.

Lloyd W.. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful sale of marijuana; punishment, two years’ confinement in the penitentiary.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, hence no question is presented for review. All matters of procedure appearing regular,, the judgment is affirmed.