alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-7067

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID S. KUYKENDALL, Virginia Department of

Corrections, District 12, Staunton, Virginia,

Respondent - Appellee.

No. 97-7296

JOHN PAUL TURNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

DAVID S. KUYKENDALL, Virginia Department of

Corrections, District 12, Staunton, Virginia,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-96-131-R)
2

Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997

Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying

relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current

version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and denying

his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the

district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the

appeals on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Kuykendall, No. CA-96-131-R (W.D. Va., July 8, and Sept. 8, 1997). See

Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997)

(No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO RULE 15d-14(b) UNDER SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934 AND

SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF UNITED STATES CODE

In connection with the quarterly report of Verso Paper Holdings LLC (the Company) for the quarterly period ended June 30 2009 (the Report),
I, Robert Mundy, certify that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

August 14, 2009



/s/ Robert P. MundyRobert P. Mundy Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

                        The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a                               ( print page 80614)                            domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.                    

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         October 3, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 26, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 403 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-764, K2024-57.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-22747 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350) In connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of Stellus Capital Investment Corporation (the Registrant), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, W. Todd Huskinson, the Chief Financial Officer of the Registrant, hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge, that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.  Name:

          

          /s/ W. Todd HuskinsonW. Todd HuskinsonDate:

          

          March 9, 2017
12 MAY 2015

Twelfth Court of Appeals

1517 West Front Street

Suite 354

Tyler, TX 75702

Re: Miguel Cruz-Romero v. State

12-14-00090-CR 

Ms. Lusk:

Attached, please find a copy of the letter sent to my client regarding the opinion issued by the 

Court and the right to file a PDR. 

Sincerely,

/s/Austin Reeve Jackson

ACCEPTED

12-14-00090-CR

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS

TYLER, TEXAS

5/13/2015 1:12:16 PM

CATHY LUSK

CLERK

 FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 5/13/2015 1:12:16 PM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk

23 APRIL 2015

Miguel Cruz-Romero

Inmate: 01927503

Beto Unit

1391 Fm 3328

Tennessee Colony TX 75880-5000

Re: Opinion

 

Mr. Cruz-Romero:

Please find enclosed a copy of opinion issued by the Twelfth Court of Appeals in your case. The 

Court has affirmed your conviction.

Should you desire to do so, you do have the right to file a pro se Petition for Discretionary 

Review in the Court of Criminal Appeals. If you decide to pursue that option you must file your 

petition prior to the expiration of thirty days from the date of the court’s opinion. That is by, 22 

May 2015. 

I would be happy to address any questions or concerns you have if you will simply let me know. 

Sincerely,

Austin Reeve Jackson
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter 

Number: 08-307 Date: November 2008 

Subject: FEHB Cost Factor for First Quarter of FY 2009 

This letter provides the imputed cost factor related to the Federal Employees Health Benefits 

Program (FEHB) for the first quarter of FY 2009. A quarterly cost factor will also be provided to you 

for the second and third quarters of the fiscal year. The annual imputed cost factors for all civilian 

benefit programs will be provided to agencies on or before September 15, 2009. 

The FEHB cost factor for the first quarter of FY 2009 is $1,403. 

If you have any questions about this letter, we would prefer that you email us at finance@opm.gov, so 

we have a record of them. Additionally, you may contact us on 202-606-0606. 

 

Keith Willingham 

Associate Chief Financial Officer 

Center for Financial Services
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Clopton House Corporation,  (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Meuse, President and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Joseph Meuse --------------------------- Joseph Meuse President and Chief Executive Officer October 18, 2007
#### BYARS v. STATE.

No. 16971.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Oct. 24, 1934.

W. D. Justice, of Athens, and Harvey P. Shead, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is murder; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for twenty-five years.

The transcript is before this court without a statement of facts.

There are some exceptions to the charge of the court, but, in the absence of the statement of facts, we are not in a position to appraise the complaints against the charge. *447This remark likewise applies to the bills of exception.

Nothing in the motion for new trial is perceived which would authorize interference with the judgment of conviction. The motion is -based mainly upon the treatment of certain evidence. In the absence of the statement of facts, the fault, if any, in the record cannot be determined on this appeal.

The judgment and sentence appear regular, condemning the appellant to suffer confinement in the state penitentiary for a period of not less than two nor more than twenty-five years.

On the record before us, the judgment is affirmed.
REMA T MATERIAL S 10 8 ESTAT

E CONTAN T ST . THOMA S V I 0080 2 rematmaterlals(5)live.co m

(340 ) 228-011 8 Specializin g i n Concret e

Novembe r 17,201 1 y Ms . Laur aRemo , C3iie

f TM An : Fitnes s IKvisio

n c- ! U.S . Departmen

t o f Tiansportatio n I , West Bmlding , Groun

d Floor , W12-14

0 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E ^ ' Washington , D.C. , 2059 0 ^ Subject : Cit

y Wing s Ai>pUcatio

n DOT-OST-2010-026 3 o Dea r Ms . Remo : -J O

" x -J 3

IHveonS t

TlKmiasinlfaeViiginlslands.Ihad bee n acustome

r o f Gt y Wings . Whenlwasb y &d r hangar, I aske

d whe n the y woul d fl y agai n an d lef t m y card . Mr . Lewi s called an

d said h e did no t have an y dat e an d tha t yo u ar e fini^bdng their

application . I aske

d i f I could help . H e gave me you r addres s an

d sai d I could sen

d al^t » t o yo aI asked wha t I could say . H e sai d fo

r m e t o us e m y ow n words . S o her

e the y are . Aiiplane s ar

e th e (»l y wa

y to g o betwee

n S t Thomas an

d S t Croix . The

y ha d th e bes t £U^ ^ an d lowest price . No w thesr

e i s cml y one airline an

d they charg e high ^ pxloes . W e ar e being hur

t b y psQin g mor e mone y whe n lot s o f people ar e out o f wori c I f yo u go t wha t yo u need aiK

i ca n appcav c them , pleas e giv e i t

s o w e ca n fl y wit h them . I kno

w dozen s o f

peopl e tha t woul d sig n a petitio n to you , bu

t they woul d jus t b e tellin g you th e sam

e tbdn g I sa y here . Lot s o f

loca l people nee d tfaero . Pleas e le

e liie mfl y agai n an d soon . Wit

h kin d r^ards . Marti n Hop e
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80282-80283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22656]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 366 to Competitive Product List. Documents

[[Page 80283]]

are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-718, K2024-11.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22656 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 STATEMENT REQUIRED BY 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
 TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Information Systems Associates, Inc. (the "Company") for the six months ended June 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Joseph P. Coschera, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify that:
 
 * The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 * The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 
 /s/ Joseph P. Coschera  Joseph P. Coschera
 Chief Executive Officer &
 Chief Financial Officer
  Date: August 13, 2009
 
 This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
OPM.gov / Telework

# Telework

Welcome to the official hub for the Federal Government's telework program! Whether you telework, supervise teleworking employees, or coordinate your agency's telework policy, you'll find resources and information here to help you succeed. 

            -  Telework Managing Officers & Coordinators**
Find tools to help your agency use telework in ways that make good business sense.
Visit Section 
            -  Supervisors Managing Teleworkers**
Explore how to use telework strategically to drive results, reduce costs, improve employees' ability to find work-life balance, and more. 
Visit Section 
            -  Telework Employees**
Get resources and best-practice strategies to support your telework and help you stay connected to your team. 
Visit Section 

## Online Telework Training

Through web-based training, OPM covers the essentials of telework to ensure that all Federal employees have access to the training they need to be motivated and effective teleworkers.Telework Fundamentals for Employees and Telework Fundamentals for Managers are now available.
Visit Section

History, Legislation, & Reports
Track federal telework's history and outcomes
Telework Enhancement Act
Read the law on federal telework 
Telework Guide
Explore the latest telework guidance

Skip to main content

### In this section

- Telework Training
- TMO and Coordinators Toggle submenu   - Building a Telework Program 
  - Leading Change 
  - Pay, Leave, & Work Schedules
  - Agency Closure
  - Performance Management 
  - Official Worksite
  - Overseas Telework
  - Reasonable Accommodations
  - Emergency Telework 
  - Recruitment & Retention
  - Security & IT
  - Mail Management
  - Dependent Care
  - Agency Roles
- Managing Teleworkers Toggle submenu   - Telework Basics
  - Results-Oriented Management
  - Work Schedules
  - Emergency Planning
  - Assessing Job Tasks
- History, Legislation, & Reports
- Telework Employees Toggle submenu   - Telework Basics
  - Employee Eligibility
  - Emergency Planning
  - Work Schedules
  - Telework Etiquette Quick Tips
REGULATORY EVALUATION

Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-143-AD

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific 

requirements for aircraft operated in Alaska, where aviation might be the only mode of 

transportation?

YES ( ) explain NO (X)
United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-2596

___________

George May, *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.; *

Anheuser-Busch Recycling *

Corporation; Busch Entertainment *

Corp.; Anheuser-Busch Container * Appeal from the United States

Recovery Corporation, * District Court for the

 * Eastern District of Missouri.

Defendants-Appellees, * [UNPUBLISHED]

---------------------------- *

George May, *

 *

Plaintiff-Appellant, *

 *

v. *

 *

Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc.; *

Anheuser-Busch Recycling *

Corporation; Busch Entertainment *

Corp.; Busch Container Recovery *

Corporation, jointly and severally, *

 *

Defendants-Appellees. *
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Missouri.

-2-

___________

 Submitted: November 5, 1996

 Filed: November 12, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, BOWMAN, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

George May appeals from the district court&s order dismissing his consolidated 1

actions alleging defendants violated state and federal law through pleadings filed in a

prior action. Having carefully reviewed the records and the parties& submissions, we

conclude that dismissal was warranted and that an extended discussion would lack

precedential value. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th

Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
Exhibit 31.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
      (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
 (b)
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control
over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
 (c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; and
 (d)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial
reporting; and
  (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have
a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
  By:
    /s/ Vicki J. DuncombVicki J. DuncombVice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 191 (Wednesday, October 2, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80277]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22658]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: October 2, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 20, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 368 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-720, K2024-13.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-22658 Filed 10-1-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
David,

This email provides data on anode coke sulfur content for Alcoa

Wenatchee.

Wenatchee limits anode coke sulfur content to 3% sulfur or below based on a monthly average. However, the sulfur content of coke
received in individual rail cars varies widely (low and high sulfur values), to provide a blend of coke that meets the monthly 3% sulfur average. Specific answers to your questions are provided below:

1) The average sulfur content of coke utilized to make anodes over the last year of ope ration ranged from 2.33% to 2.76%. The
coke utilized to make anodes was a "blend" of individual rail car shipments that had sulfur contents ranging from approximately 2.06% to 3.19% sulfur. (See attached spreadsheet with two tabs: "Railcar Shipments" and "Monthly Average".)

2) The highest monthly average sulfur content in the coke utilized to make anodes during the last 10 years was 2.93%. The highest sulfur content of an individual rail car shipment was
3.37%.

3) Given concerns about the future availa bility of low sulfur coke, Alcoa believes that the lowest sulfur content anode coke that will be available in sufficient quantities to operate Wenatchee at capacity long term is 3% sulfur. This 3% sulfur coke will be a blend of low and high sulfur materia l.

Mike

Michael Palazzolo Alcoa, Inc.
201 Isabella Street Pittsburgh, PA 15212

- 5858
Ph: 412

- 553

- 4832

(See attached file: Wenatchee Coke S Data.xlsx)