alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d)
of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 1, 2007
 GLOBAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.
  Louisiana
    
    0-21086
    
    72-1212563(State or Other Jurisdiction of 
Incorporation or Organization)
    
    (Commission File Number)
    
    (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 8000 Global Drive 
P.O. Box 442, Sulphur, LA
    
    70665
70664-0442(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 337) 583-5000
    ̈
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
  ̈
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
  ̈
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
  ̈
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
  Item 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
 (a)
    
    Financial statements of business acquired.
Not Applicable.(b)
    
    Pro forma financial information.
Not Applicable.(c)
    
    Shell company transactions.
Not applicable.(d)
    
    Exhibits.
99.1 Global Industries, Ltd. press release dated August 1, 2007.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  GLOBAL INDUSTRIES, LTD.Date: August 2, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Peter S. AtkinsonName:
    Peter S. AtkinsonTitle:
    President and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 ExhibitNumber
    
    Exhibit Description99.1
    
    
    Global Industries, Ltd. press release dated August 1, 2007.
# CE2004078EN.01017901.xml

| 27.3.2004 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | CE 78/179 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2004

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

CE 78/179

---

(2004/C 78 E/0185)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-2850/03

by Stavros Xarchakos (PPE-DE) to the Commission

(26 September 2003)

Subject:   Unsatisfactory performance by building and holiday home cooperatives in Greece

Subject:

Very strong dissatisfaction is being expressed in Greece by members of building and holiday home cooperatives who maintain that, having paid annual and lump sum contributions over long periods, they have not yet obtained building plots. One example of this is the Medical Staff Summer Property Cooperative situated in Athens (Odos Rizari 17), founded in 1965 and officially recognised in 1968 by the Greek Social Affairs Ministry. It has 3090 members. However, after a period of over 35 years its members (doctors and medical staff) maintain that they have not yet obtained building plots despite payment of their annual contributions to the cooperative, together with additional lump sum payments amounting to hundreds of thousands of drachmae each (at early 1980s prices).

What view does the Commission take of the fact that nationals of an EU Member State have for 35 years or more been paying contributions and subscriptions to a building cooperative without yet obtaining from it the building plots to which they are entitled? What legal measures can be taken to protect the interests of the thousands of members of this and other cooperatives which have been collecting subscriptions for years (or, as claimed by the members of this particular association, for decades) without any building plots having yet been obtained?

Answer given by Mr Byrne on behalf of the Commission

(11 November 2003)

(11 November 2003)

There is no relevant European legislation covering the situation described by the Honourable Member. The provisions of Directive 94/47/EC on the protection of purchasers in respect of certain aspects of contracts relating to the purchase of the right to use immovable properties on a timeshare basis do not apply to cooperatives. Timeshare amounts to buying a right to spend a set period of time once a year in a holiday property for three years or longer. The purchase of a plot in a building or holiday home cooperative does not limit the enjoyment of this plot to a set annual period of time.

The Commission has no jurisdiction to deal with private matters, such as those raised in the question asked by the Honourable Member, which, on the basis of the information provided, appears to be a contractual matter solely for the national authorities concerned.

---
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 78916]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22183]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 3:30 p.m., Monday, September 30, 2024.

PLACE: via ZOOM.

STATUS: Parts of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
the meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  Special Board of Directors meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in her 
opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in 
the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) permit closure of the following 
portion(s) of this meeting:

<bullet> Executive (Closed) Session

Agenda

I. Call to Order
II. Approval of Government in Sunshine Act Notice Waiver for a 
Meeting of the Board of Directors
III. Sunshine Act Approval of Executive (Closed) Session
IV. Executive Session: Special Topic
V. Discussion Item: Overview of Strategic Planning Process & 
Discussion Questions
VI. Discussion Item: Key Themes from Market Research and Internal 
Scan
VII. Discussion Item: Emerging Strategic Focus Areas
VIII. Next Steps


PORTIONS OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:  Everything except the Executive (Closed) 
Session.

PORTIONS CLOSED TO THE PUBLIC:  Executive (Closed) Session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Jenna Sylvester, Paralegal, (202) 
568-2560; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1a706963766c7f696e7f685a746d3475687d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="076d747e6b71627473627547697029687560">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jenna Sylvester,
Paralegal.
[FR Doc. 2024-22183 Filed 9-24-24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7570-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
From: Cogliano, Gerain

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 2:26 PM

To: 'Jones, Danielle' < Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov >

Subject: RE: Follow

- up Question re EO 12866 Interagency Review: EPA's Modernization of the Accidental

Release Prevention Regulations Under Clean Air Act

Thanks!

From: Jones, Danielle [ mailto:Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 2:10 PM

To: Cogliano, Gerain < Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov >

Subject: RE: Follow

- up Question re EO 12866 Interagency Review: EPA' s Modernization of the Accidental

Release Prevention Regulations Under Clean Air Act

Hi Gerain,

The reviewer confers with no further comment.

Thanks,

Danielle

From: Cogliano, Gerain [ mailto:Cogliano.Gerain@epa.gov ]

Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2016 9:51 AM

To: Jones, Danielle < Danielle_Y_Jones@omb.eop.gov >

Subject: Follow

- up Question re EO 12866 Interagency Review: EPA's Modernizati on of the Accidental

Release Prevention Regulations Under Clean Air Act

Hi Danielle,

For comment #8, it’s not clear what more we need to do. Where the comment says “the challenge will

be some of the processes that improve security may actually impede safety, and the reverse,”

- we

agree and have already acknowledged this tension in the preamble. In the IST discussion on page 83 we

state (mid

- way in the paragraph):

“Because an option may be inherently safer with regard to some hazards and inherently l ess safe with

regard to others, the decision process must consider the entire life cycle, the full spectrum of hazards

and risks, and the potential for transfer of risk from one impacted population to another.”

Later in the same section (last 3 sentences of the paragraph):

“Few technologies will be inherently safer with respect to all hazards, and other approaches will usually

be required to manage the full range of hazards and risks. As an example, the [DHS] report points out

that an IST with respect to a catastrophic release hazard may conflict with methods to minimize other

hazards, such as theft or diversion of materials , contamination of product, or degradation of

infrastructure. It may not address other hazards at all, or it may create new hazards.”(Emphasis added) Here we’re specifically referring to the DHS report prepared by CCPS, and we clearly

highlight the concern. As such, we’re unclear as to what more we should do to address comment 8. Any

clarification on this would be appreciated. Thanks.

Gerain
**Exhibit 10.39**March 15, 2007Dear Mr. LordWhen executed by all the parties below this letter will serve as an extension until September15, 2007 of the Note Payable of Remote Knowledge, Inc. (“RKI”), dated September 8,2006 ,and due March 15, 2007 for $200,000 issued to Ralph H. Lord (“Holder”) (the “Note”).As consideration for this 6 month extension RKI will issue to Holder 66,667 shares of itscommon stock. All terms of the Note except the due date shall remain unchanged and in full forceand effect.         Agreed and Accepted
Exhibit 35.1





LOGO

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT (ITEM 1123)

Cenlar FSB

The undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Cenlar FSB, as servicer (the Servicer) pursuant to the applicable servicing agreements governing the securities listed on Exhibit A, does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the Servicers activities during the period 1/1/14 to 12/31/14, (the Reporting Period) and of the Servicers performance
under the applicable servicing agreement has been made under my supervision.

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has
fulfilled all of its obligations under the applicable servicing agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 28th day of February 2015.



|    |  |                   |  |                      
|--- |  | ----------------- |  | ---------------------
|By: |  | /s/ Michael Blair
|    |  | Name:             |  | Michael Blair        
|    |  | Title:            |  | Senior Vice President



---

Exhibit A

Securities Covered in Cenlar FSBs Servicer Compliance Statement 1123:

Redwood Trust, Inc.



|         |  |                                       |  |             |  |                                 
|-------- |  | ------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | --------------------------------
|Investor |  | Issuer                                |  | Security    |  | *Period
Subserviced by CenlarFSB
|H06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-1 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|K06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-2 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|L06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-3 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|Z06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-4 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|Y06      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-5 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW0      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2012-6 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW1      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-1 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW2/S11  |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-2 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW3      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-3 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW4      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-4 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW5      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-5 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW6      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-6 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14                 
|RW7      |  | Redwood Residential Acquisition Corp. |  | SEMT 2013-7 |  | 1/1 to 12/31/14
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
RENE VASQUEZ

- GARCIA, AKA Juan Gonzalez Garcia,

Petitioner,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent. No. 19

- 73134 Agency No. A070

- 954

- 693

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 16, 2021 * *
Before: GRABER, R. NELSON, and HUNSAKER, Circuit Judges. Rene Vasquez

- Garcia , a native and citizen of Guatemala , petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision terminating asylum status and denying his application for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

MAR 24 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 19

- 73134

Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the agency ’ s particularly serious crime
determination. Avendano

- Hernandez v. Lynch , 800 F.3d 1072, 1077 (9th Cir. 2015). W e review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Garcia

Milian v. Holder , 755 F.3d 1026, 1031 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny in part and dismiss in part t he petition for review. The agency did not abuse its discretion in determining that Vasquez

Garcia ’s conviction under Cal. Health & Safety Code § 11352(a) was a particularly serious crime that barred him from withholding of removal, where it applied the appropriate factors to weigh the seriousness of the crime in a case

- specific inquiry.
See Avendano

- Hernandez , 800 F.3d at 1077 (“Our review is limited to ensuring that the agency relied on the appropriate factors and proper evidence to reach this conclusion.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)). Thus, Vasquez

Garcia ’s withhol ding of removal claim fail s
. Vasquez

- Garcia does not raise , and therefore waives, any challenge to the agency’s denial of deferral of removal under CAT and the termination and denial of asylum . Thus, these issue s are waived. See Lopez

- Vasquez v. Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013) (concluding petitioner waived challenge to issue not specifically raised and argued in the opening brief).
W e lack jurisdiction to consider Vasquez

- Garcia’s contentions as to the3 19

- 73134

conduct of p roceedings and alleged errors and delay s by the IJ, government counsel, and government agency officials because he did not raise any of these
issues to the BIA

. See Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (petitioner must exhaust issues o r claims in administrative proceedings below). The temporary stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate. The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 1 ) is otherwise
denied.
PETITI ON FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part
.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of WhiteHorse Finance, Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) for the annual period ended December 31, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jay Carvell, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge that: (1)

          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)

          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Jay CarvellName:

          

          Jay CarvellTitle:

          

          Chief Executive OfficerDate:

          

          March 15, 2016
From: <Alicea.Jezebele@epamail.epa.gov>

To: "Kolarick, John" <jkolarick@libgen.com>

Date: 7/20/2010 2:40 PM

Subject: Re: Request for Extension of Time for Questionnaire - Plant ID 09522

Attachments: pic14713.jpg; Request for Extension of Time - Plant ID 09522.pdf

Greetings,

EPA has reviewed your extension request for the steam electric effluent

guidelines questionnaire for the Liberty Electric Power Plant. Your

request for extension has been denied. The deadline for your plant to

submit Version 4 of the completed questionnaire remains 90 days after

receipt.

If you need assistance during the completion of the steam electric

questionnaire, please contact the steam electric helpline via e-mail at

steamhelp@erg.com or by phone at 1-877-353-7560.

Sincerely,

(Embedded image moved to file: pic14713.jpg)

 

 From: "Kolarick, John" <jkolarick@libgen.com> 

 To: Jezebele Alicea/DC/USEPA/US@EPA 

 Cc: Tom Favinger <tfavinger@cpv.com>, Joseph Michienzi <jmichienzi@cpv.com>, "Duff, Dan" 

<dduff@libgen.com>, 

 "Pamela.Berner@NAES.com" <Pamela.Berner@NAES.com> 

 

 Date: 06/29/2010 04:59 PM 

 Subject: Request for Extension of Time for Questionnaire - Plant ID 09522 

Dear Ms. Alicia,

Liberty Electric Power received the Department’s request for the

completion of the Questionnaire for the Steam Electric Power Generating

Effluent Guidelines. Attached is a request for an extension of time.

Please advise on our request at your earliest convenience.

Thank you,

John
John Kolarick

Plant Manager

Liberty Electric Power, LLC

1000 Industrial Highway

Eddystone, PA 19022

Main: 610-872-2300

Direct: 610-872-8022

Fax: 610-872-7685

 (See attached file: Request for Extension of Time - Plant ID 09522.pdf)
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| (1)    | the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                 |

| Date: September 22, 2011                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                              |
|                                                              |
| /s/Bob Armstrong                    |
| Bob ArmstrongChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer) |
Order entered May 1, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01317-CV

THE ESTATE OF MAX D. HOPPER, DECEASED

On Appeal from the Probate Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. PR-11-03238-1

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant and cross-appellant’s April 30, 2019 agreed motion to reset 

briefing deadlines and direct the reporter to file a corrected and complete record. The parties 

explain the reporter’s record filed April 16, 2019 omits (1) all pre-trial and post-trial hearings 

and exhibits; (2) the pre-admitted trial exhibits; (3) the supplemental exhibits consisting of the 

transcripts of video testimony presented to the jury; and (4) the transcripts of video and audio 

clips the parties played at trial. The parties request the briefing deadlines be set once the 

corrected and complete record is filed.

We GRANT the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.6(e). We STRIKE the April 16th

reporter’s record and ORDER court reporter Jackie Galindo to file, no later than May 31, 2019, 

a corrected reporter’s record that includes (1) a transcript of the trial, including a transcript of all 

video and audio clips played at trial; (2) a transcript of all pre-trial and post-trial hearings; (3) the 

pre-admitted trial exhibits; and, (4) the supplemental exhibits consisting of the transcripts of the 
video testimony presented to the jury. We further ORDER opening briefs be filed no later than 

thirty days after the filing of the reporter’s record.

We DIRECT the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this order to the Honorable Brenda 

Hull Thompson, Presiding Judge of Probate Court No. 1; Ms. Galindo; and, the parties.

/s/ KEN MOLBERG 

JUSTICE
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Western Goldfields Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007, as filed
      with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Brian Penny, Chief
      Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) of the Company certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      November 5, 2007




By:
                Brian PennyBrian
                Penny
              Chief
                Financial Officer (Principal Financial
                Officer)






A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been
      provided to the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or its staff upon request.