alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 1986 

 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 97-204 Date: April 2, 1997 

SUBJECT: Gratuities Offered by Federal Employees Health Benefit Carriers

Recently, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) became aware that Federal

employees, including several Agency Benefits Officers, received invitations from a Federal

Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) carrier for free admission to a sporting event.

You no doubt are aware that there are strict standards governing the offering and acceptance

of gifts and gratuities involving organizations doing business with the Federal Government. 

Under certain circumstances, civil as well as criminal sanctions can be imposed on both the

organization and the Federal employee. You should contact an agency ethics official for

further guidance or for advice involving a specific situation.

Furthermore, under Contract Clause 5.3, which is included in each carrier's contract with

OPM, a carrier which offers or gives a gratuity (e.g., an entertainment or gift) to an officer,

official, or employee of the Government with the intent of obtaining favorable treatment, may

have its contract terminated and be subject to any other damages provided by law. A copy of

the contract clause is enclosed.

Agency Benefits Officers who receive an offer of a gratuity from an FEHB carrier should

report this information to the OPM Office of the Inspector General by calling its Fraud

Hotline at (202) 418-3300.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy and

 Information Division

Enclosure
SECTION 5.3

GRATUITIES (APR 1984) (FAR 52.203-3)

(a) The right of the Contractor to proceed may be terminated by written notice if, after

notice and hearing, the agency head or a designee determines that the Contractor, its agent, or

another representative -

(1) Offered or gave a gratuity (e.g., an entertainment or gift) to an officer, official, or

employee of the Government; and

(2) Intended, by the gratuity, to obtain a contract or favorable treatment under a

contract.

(b) The facts supporting this determination may be reviewed by any court having

lawful jurisdiction.

(c) If this contract is terminated under paragraph (a) above, the Government is entitled

-

(1) To pursue the same remedies as in a breach of the contract; and

(2) In addition to any other damages provided by law, to exemplary damages of not

less than 3 nor more than 10 times the cost incurred by the Contractor in giving gratuities to

the person concerned, as determined by the agency head or a designee. (This subparagraph

(c)(2) is applicable only if this contract uses money appropriated to the Department of

Defense.)

(d) The rights and remedies of the Government provided in this clause shall not be

exclusive and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this

contract.
----

Corrigendum to Commission Regulation (EC) No 815/2004 of 29 April 2004 laying down transitional measures as regards exports of milk and milk products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union

(Official Journal of the European Union L 153 of 30 April 2004)

Regulation (EC) No 815/2004 should read as follows:

                        COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 815/2004

of 29 April 2004                     

laying down transitional measures as regards exports of milk and milk products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, by reason of the accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia to the European Union

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to the Treaty of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular Article 2(3) thereof,

Having regard to the Act of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia, and in particular the first paragraph of Article 41 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

By way of derogation from Article 1(4) of Regulation (EC) No 174/1999, products obtained before the date of accession in establishments of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia authorised to export to the Community before the accession date and exported from the Community in the period from the accession date to 31 August 2004 are eligible for an export refund, provided that they meet the requirements of Article 3(a) and (b) of Decision 2004/280/EC.

The document referred to in Article 3(b) of that Decision shall be as set out in Article 5(8) of Directive 92/46/EEC.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force subject to and on the date of the entry into force of the Treaty of Accession of the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Malta, Poland, Slovenia and Slovakia.

It shall apply to export declarations accepted from the date of the entry into force of this Regulation to 31 August 2004.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 29 April 2004.

For the Commission

Franz FISCHLER                        

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 20, 27.1.1999, p. 8. Regulation as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 606/2004 (OJ L 97, 1.4.2004, p. 40).

(2)OJ L 268, 14.9.1992, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 806/2003 (OJ L 122, 16.5.2003, p. 1).

(3)OJ L 87, 25.3.2004, p. 60.

----
#### WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 17362.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 28, 1934.

Lane & Lane, of Marshall, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for five years.

It has been made known to this court by proper affidavit that appellant died October 7, 1934, after having perfected his appeal. The death of the appellant deprives this court of jurisdiction of the appeal. It is therefore dismissed.
# Official Journal C 259/2020

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 259 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 637 August 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 259

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 637 August 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2020/C 259/01 | Euro exchange rates — 6 August 2020 | 1 |
| 2020/C 259/02 | Commission guidance for the medical devices expert panels on the consistent interpretation of the decision criteria in the clinical evaluation consultation procedure (
  1
  ) | 2 |
| 2020/C 259/03 | Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems — Decision No H9 of 17 June 2020 regarding the postponement of deadlines mentioned in Articles 67 and 70 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as well as in Decision No S9 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic (
  1
  ) | 9 |
| | NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES |
| 2020/C 259/04 | Notice from the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products | 10 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2020/C 259/01

Euro exchange rates — 6 August 2020

1

2020/C 259/02

Commission guidance for the medical devices expert panels on the consistent interpretation of the decision criteria in the clinical evaluation consultation procedure (
  1
  )

1

2

2020/C 259/03

Administrative Commission for the Coordination of Social Security Systems — Decision No H9 of 17 June 2020 regarding the postponement of deadlines mentioned in Articles 67 and 70 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council as well as in Decision No S9 due to the COVID-19 Pandemic (
  1
  )

1

9

NOTICES FROM MEMBER STATES

2020/C 259/04

Notice from the Government of Denmark pursuant to Council Directive 2009/119/EC imposing an obligation on Member States to maintain minimum stocks of crude oil and/or petroleum products

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0060

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

ROBERT AYRES DASILVA, JR.,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including January 13, 2023, within which to prepare, file, 

and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

December 6 2022

12/06/2022

Case Number: DA 22-0060
EXHIBIT 21



PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES

(Included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Wholly-owned)




National Presto Industries, Inc.

Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)



Its Subsidiaries:


National Holding Investment Company


Wilmington, Delaware (A Delaware Corporation)




Its Subsidiaries:


Presto Manufacturing Company


Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)




Its Division:


Presto Products Manufacturing Company (Inactive)


Alamogordo, New Mexico




Century Leasing and Liquidating, Inc. (Inactive)


Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)




Its Subsidiary:


Presto Export, Inc. (Inactive)


Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)




Jackson Sales and Storage Company


Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)




Canton Sales & Storage Company


Canton, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)




Presto Export, Ltd. (Inactive)


Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands (A Virgin Islands Corporation)




National Defense Corporation (Inactive)


Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)




AMTEC Corporation


Janesville, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)




Its Subsidiary:


Spectra Technologies LLC


East Camden, Arkansas (A Delaware Corporation)




Presto Absorbent Products, Inc.


Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)




Its Division:


Presto Absorbent Products-Atlanta


Marietta, Georgia




NPI Export Corporation (Inactive)


Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)




---
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

April 28, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

128768 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

TERI ROHDE, BRENDON QUILTER, MARY Maura D. Corrigan 

QUILTER, WALTER MACKEY, BARBARA Robert P. Young, Jr. 

MACKEY, GARY GIBSON, ELLEN GIBSON, Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices TED JUNGKUNTZ, LOISE JUNGKUNTZ, 

DAVID SPONSELLER, MARY SPONSELLER, 

MIKE GLADIEUX, MARTHA GLADIEUX, 

HELEN RYSSE, TERRY TROMBLEY, JOHN 

WILLIAMS, and THERESE WILLIAMS,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 128768 

 COA: 253565 

Washtenaw CC: 03-001046-CZ 

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS a/k/a PUBLIC 

SCHOOLS OF THE CITY OF ANN ARBOR,

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ANN ARBOR 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS, PRESIDENT OF THE 

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ANN ARBOR 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS, and TREASURER OF THE 

BOARD OF EDUCATION FOR ANN ARBOR 

PUBLIC SCHOOLS, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

ANN ARBOR EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, 

MEA/NEA, 

 Intervening Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the April 14, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral 

argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 

7.302(G)(1). The parties shall address at oral argument only the issue of what constitutes 

an effective demand under MCL 129.61. They may file supplemental briefs, limited to 

this issue, within 28 days of the date of this order. 

p025 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

April 28, 2006 

Clerk
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00410-CR

Lashundra Tana Lockhart

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From Criminal District Court No. 2

of Tarrant County (1325755R)

June 12, 2014

Opinion by Justice Walker

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of 

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Sue Walker___________________

 Justice Sue Walker
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SEC. 1350


(SECTION
      906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002)





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of, MIP Solutions Inc. (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeff Lamberson,
      President, Principal Executive Officer, I, Edward Hunton, Principal Financial
      Officer and Director of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec.
      1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
      August 14, 2008





By:
            /s/
                Jeff Lamberson
            
            /s/
                Edward HuntonJeff
                Lamberson
            Edward
                HuntonPresident,
                Chief Executive Officer
            Chief
                Financial Officer and Director
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3167 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit the designation 

of individuals who are not employees of the Internal Revenue Service 

to examine certain books and witnesses. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 22, 2015 

Mr. KATKO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to prohibit 

the designation of individuals who are not employees 

of the Internal Revenue Service to examine certain books 

and witnesses. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Tax Administration 

5 Integrity Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3167 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON DESIGNATION OF INDIVIDUALS 

2 WHO ARE NOT EMPLOYEES OF THE IRS TO 

3 EXAMINE CERTAIN BOOKS AND WITNESSES. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6103(n) of the Internal 

5 Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end 

6 the following: ‘‘No such person may be designated to re7 ceive summoned books, papers, records, or other data and 

8 to take summoned testimony under oath.’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

10 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enact11 ment of this Act and shall apply to any designation of 

12 a person under section 6103(n) of the Internal Revenue 

13 Code of 1986 pursuant to section 301.7602–1T of the 

14 temporary regulations adopted June 17, 2014 (TD 9669), 

15 that is in effect on the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3321 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the volumetric excise 

tax credit for liquid fuel derived from natural gas through the FischerTropsch process. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. BOUSTANY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow the 

volumetric excise tax credit for liquid fuel derived from 

natural gas through the Fischer-Tropsch process. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. VOLUMETRIC EXCISE TAX CREDIT FOR LIQUID 

4 FUEL DERIVED FROM NATURAL GAS 

5 THROUGH FISCHER-TROPSCH PROCESS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 6426(d)(2)(E) of the In7 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended— 

8 (1) by inserting ‘‘or’’ at the end, 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3321 IH

1 (2) by striking ‘‘liquid fuel which meets’’ and 

2 inserting the following: ‘‘liquid fuel which— 

3 ‘‘(i) meets’’, and 

4 (3) by adding at the end, as amended by the 

5 preceding provisions of this section, the following 

6 new clause: 

7 ‘‘(ii) is derived from natural gas 

8 through such process,’’. 

9 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

10 this section shall apply to any sale or use for any period 

11 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section
      1350)




The
      undersigned, as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
      respectively, of 2020 ChinaCap Acquirco, Inc., certify that, to the best of
      their knowledge and belief, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period
      ended June 30, 2008, which accompanies this certification, fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
      the
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of 2020 ChinaCap Acquirco,
      Inc. at the dates and for the periods indicated. The foregoing certification
      is
      made pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350) and shall not be relied upon for any other purpose. The
      undersigned expressly disclaim any obligation to update the foregoing
      certification except as required by law.






Date:
                August 12, 2008
            /s/
                George LuGeorge
                LuPresident
                and Chief Executive OfficerDate:
                August 12, 2008
            /s/
                Louis KooLouis
                KooVice
                President & Chief Financial
                Officer
Exhibit
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Steven D. Eversole, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky
USA Energy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2009 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Kentucky USA Energy, Inc..








Date:
      March 23, 2009
                By:
                /s/
      Steven D. EversoleSteven
      D. EversoleChief
      Executive Officer














A signed
original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
Kentucky USA Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Kentucky USA Energy, Inc.,
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
EX-35.2
(logo) FIRST REPUBLIC BANK
It's a privilege to serve you

Feb 28, 2013

Servicer Compliance Statement
For SEMT 2012-3


(i) a review of the Servicer's activities during the immediately preceding
calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement and the Reconstitution
Agreement for the above referenced trust during such period has been made under
such officer's supervision, and

(ii) To the best of such officers' knowledge, based on such review, the
Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement and the
Reconstitution Agreement for the above referenced trust in all material
respects throughout such calendar year.

First Republic Bank

/s/ Lionel Antunes
Lionel Antunes
Vice President of Residential Lending
February 28, 2013

San Francisco  Palo Alto  Los Angeles  Santa Barbara  Newport Beach  San Diego
Portland  Boston  Greenwich  New York


111 PINE STREET, SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111, TEL (415) 392-1400 OR
(800) 392-1400, FAX (415) 392-1413

CONVENIENT INTERNET BANKING AT www.firstrepublic.com * MEMBER FDIC
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3348 

To direct the Attorney General to create a special reward program for individuals providing information leading to the apprehension and conviction 

of persons committing offenses under section 1030 of title 18, United 

States Code, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. AL GREEN of Texas (for himself, Mr. POE of Texas, and Mr. DUFFY) 

introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the 

Judiciary 

A BILL 

To direct the Attorney General to create a special reward 

program for individuals providing information leading to 

the apprehension and conviction of persons committing 

offenses under section 1030 of title 18, United States 

Code, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Providing Rewards for 

5 Outstanding Tips to Expose Crimes in Technology Act of 

6 2015’’ or ‘‘PROTECT Act of 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3348 IH

1 SEC. 2. CYBERCRIME REWARD PROGRAM. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General shall estab3 lish and publicize a special reward program for individuals 

4 providing information leading to the apprehension and 

5 conviction of persons committing offenses under section 

6 1030 of title 18, United States Code. 

7 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—There 

8 are authorized to be appropriated $1,000,000 for each of 

9 fiscal years 2016 through 2020 to carry out this section. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS