alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Mario Ferrarese, Plaintiff, *v.*Washington Restaurant of Rochester, Inc., Defendant.

County Court, Monroe County,

May 12, 1958.

*J. William Reeves*for defendant.

*Walter C. Eves*for plaintiff.

*257Geobge D. Ogden, J.

Upon the papers submitted, it is my opinion that no special circumstances are shown which entitle plaintiff to a bill of particulars of the affirmative defense of payment. Defendant’s motion to vacate plaintiff’s demand for a bill of particulars is, accordingly, granted, with $10 costs of motion (see *Yangtsze Ins. Assn.,*v. *Stark & Co.,*195 App. Div. 401).

Submit order.
**FIRST AMENDMENT TOPOST-PETITION CREDIT AGREEMENT**

        ThisFirst Amendment to Post-Petition Credit Agreement (this “Agreement”) is enteredinto this 31st day of October, 2002 by and among OWENS CORNING, a Delaware corporation(the “Company”), as Borrower Representative on behalf of the Borrowers under theCredit Agreement defined below, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., as the Agent under the CreditAgreement defined below, and the other Lenders signatory hereto. 

**W I T N E S S E T H:**

        WHEREAS,the Borrowers, the Agent and the Lenders are parties to that certain Post-Petition CreditAgreement dated as of December 8, 2000 (as heretofore amended, the “CreditAgreement”); 

        WHEREAS,the Borrowers have requested that the Agent and the Lenders amend the Credit Agreement to,among other things, extend the Stated Termination Date from November 15, 2002 to November15, 2004 and reduce the Maximum Revolver Amount from $500,000,000 to $250,000,000, uponthe terms and subject to the conditions set forth herein. 

        NOWTHEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual agreements, provisions and covenants containedherein and in the Credit Agreement, the parties agree as follows: 

        Section 2           Amendments to CreditAgreement. Subject to the effectiveness of this Agreement pursuant to Section 3hereof, the Credit Agreement is hereby amended as follows: 

        2.1           Section 1.1 of the CreditAgreement is hereby amended by deleting “$500,000,000” and replacing it with“$250,000,000.” 

        2.2           Section 3.2 of the CreditAgreement is hereby amended by deleting “$300,000,000” from the second paragraphthereof and replacing it with “$200,000,000” and deleting“$50,000,000” from each place it appears in the second paragraph thereof andreplacing it with “$25,000,000.” 

        2.3           Section 5.2(a) of theCredit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “Arthur Andersen LLP” andreplacing it with “PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP.” 

        2.4           Section 6.5(a) of theCredit Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “Arthur Andersen LLP” andreplacing it with “PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP.” 

        2.6           Section 7.21 of the Credit Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76858]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21388]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Cancellation of 
Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of the cancellation of the National Asthma 
Education Prevention Program Coordinating Committee, September 23, 
2024, 11:00 a.m. to September 23, 2024, 1:00 p.m., National Institutes 
of Health, 6100 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 which was 
published in the Federal Register on July 30, 2024, 89 FR 61131.
    The meeting is being postponed to a later date. A new Federal 
Register Notice will be posted once a new date has been set.

    Dated: September 13, 2024.
Bruce A. George,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-21388 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Retirement Coverage Error Correction Provisions of FERCCA

TYPE OF ERROR

ErroneouslyPut In:

CorrectCoverage Is:

RETIREMENT BENEFIT OPTIONS WHAT HAPPENS TO SOCIAL SECURITY WHAT HAPPENS TO THRIFT SAVINGS PLAN

CSRS FERSChoice between FERS and CSRS

Offset coverage.*Erroneous CSRS contributions are

reallocated to Social Security.

CSRS Offset FERSChoice between CSRS Offset and

FERS. * No change.

If you choose FERS, you may make make-up contributions.  Lost earnings are paid on

make-up contributions.

CSRS Offset CSRS None.  Correction to CSRS. Social Security coverage terminates.

CSRS CSRS Offset None.  Correction to CSRS Offset. Erroneous CSRS contributions arereallocated to Social Security.

No change.

FERS CSRSChoice between FERS and CSRS

coverage. *If you choose CSRS, Social Security

coverage terminates.

If you choose CSRS, your contributions andearnings remain in your account.

Government contributions and earnings areremoved from your account.

FERS CSRS OffsetChoice between FERS and CSRS

Offset coverage. * No change.

If you choose CSRS Offset, yourcontributions and earnings remain in youraccount. Government contributions and

earnings are removed from your account.

CSRS Social SecurityChoice between CSRS Offset and

Social Security. *Erroneous CSRS contributions are

reallocated to Social Security.

FERS Social SecurityChoice between FERS and Social

Security coverage. *

CSRS Offset Social SecurityChoice between CSRS Offset and

Social Security. *No change.

If you choose Social Security, you may keepyour contributions and earnings.

Government contributions and earnings areremoved from your account.

Social Security CSRS None. Correction to CSRS. Social Security coverage terminates.

Social Security CSRS Offset None. Correction to CSRS Offset.

Social Security FERS None. Correction to FERS.No change.

You may make make-up contributions.  Lostearnings are paid on make-up contributions.

*  Most retirement benefit options require that you were in the wrong retirement plan for at least 3 years.
Wells Fargo(Logo)
Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334




ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference  is  hereby  made  to  that  certain  Pooling and  Servicing  Agreement  dated
as  of  July 1,  2012,  by  and  among  UBS  Commercial  Mortgage  Securitization  Corp.,  as  Depositor,
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, CW Capital Asset Management, LLC,
as  Special  Servicer,  Pentalpha  Surveillance,  LLC,  as  Operating  Advisor  and  U.S.  Bank,  National
Association  as  Trustee,  Certificiate  Administrator,  Paying  Agent  and  Custodian,  with  respect  to
Commercial  Mortgage  Pass-Through  Certificates  Series  2012-C2  (the  "Agreement").  Capitalized
terms used herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 10.11  of this Agreement,  I, Daniel  Bober, Executive Vice  President  of
Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1.

A  review  of  the  activities  of  the  Master  Servicer  during  the  period  from  January  1,
2014  through  December  31,  2014  (the  "Reporting  Period"),  and  of  its  performance
per the Agreement during such period has been made under my supervision, and

2.

To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer has fulfilled
all  of  its  obligations  under  the  Agreement  in  all  material  respects  throughout  the
Reporting Period.




IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 6th day of March 2015.









/s/Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank














Wells Fargo Bank, N.A
#### DE WEES v. AMERICAN HOUSEHOLD FINANCE CO. OF TEXAS.

No. 12311.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Dallas.

Feb. 5, 1938.

Oren Parmeter, of Dallas, for appellant.

.Taylor, Irwin & Irwin, of Dallas, for appellee.

BOND, Chief Justice.

Appellee, American Household Finance Company of Texas, instituted suit against appellant, H. F. DeWees, upon a note in the sum of $1,000, and for foreclosure of a chattel mortgage on an automobile; also sought appointment of a receiver on allegations that the defendant is wholly insolvent, that the automobile is insufficient in value to discharge the mortgage debt, and that the automobile is being injured and abused to plaintiff’s irreparable loss. A receiver was appointed ex parte to take charge of the automobile, subject to further orders of the court, and notice directed to'be given to the defendant to appear at a subsequent date, to show cause, why the receivership should not be continued in force, the automobile sold, and the proceeds held pending the outcome of the suit.

Prior to the time set for the hearing, the defendant filed a motion to have the receivership vacated and the automobile returned to him, and, as grounds therefor, set out in sworn pleadings that the note for which the mortgage on the automobile was given had been fully paid, and that the $1,000 note sued on was not executed by him, or by any one with authority for him. On hearing of defendant’s motion, plaintiff urged general demurrer to the petition. The court sustained the demurrer and, defendant declining to amend, dismissed defendant’s motion, thus refusing to vacate the receivership.

We think the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer to the defendant’s petition; and in dismissing the motion to vacate the receivership. Indeed, the matters alleged go to the merits of the suit, yet, if true, they present- an absolute defense to any action of the plaintiff to dispossess him of his property. A general demurrer raises the presumption that the allegations of the defendant’s pleadings are true; therefore, if the deed and mortgage on the automobile had been fully paid and the $1,000 note sued on had not been executed by the defendant, or by another with authority for him, as alleged in the petition, manifestly plaintiff would have no cause for the appointment of a receiver, to take charge of defendant’s property; .for, if the evidence oh the hearing of the motion to vacáte would have shown *276or raised a reasonable doubt in the mind of the court as to the existence of a valid and subsisting debt and mortgage, it would have been the duty of the court to vacate the receivership!

Appellant was entitled to a hearing on the matters alleged, and, ‘being deprived of such hearing by the action of the court in sustaining appellee’s demurrer and dismissing the petition, the judgment of the court below is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Patricia L. Bitar, CPA, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of TRACON Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; and

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.

 

| Date:  February 15, 2017  | /s/ Patricia L. Bitar, CPA                   |
|------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------|
|                                     | Patricia L. Bitar, CPA                       |
|                                     | Chief Financial Officer                      |
|                                     | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|   | (1) (2) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|--------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | November      13, 2008 |
|--------|------------------------|

|   |   |                                                                      |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |
|   |   | /s/      Robert P. Mundy                                                  |
|   |   | Robert      P. MundySenior      Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer |
EXHIBIT 21

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

|                                         |  |             |  |                         | 
|---------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------------------- | 
|Name                                     |  | Ownership % |  | State of
 Incorporation | 
|                                         |  |             |  |                         | 
|                                         |  |             |  |                         | 
|Public Service Electric
 and Gas Company |  | 100         |  | New Jersey              | 
|PSEG Power LLC                           |  | 100         |  | Delaware                | 
|PSEG Fossil LLC                          |  | 100         |  | Delaware                | 
|PSEG Energy Resources
 & Trade LLC       |  | 100         |  | Delaware                | 
|PSEG Energy Holdings
 L.L.C.             |  | 100         |  | New Jersey              | 

The
remaining subsidiaries of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated are not
significant subsidiaries as defined in Regulation S-X.

---
Holland & Knight 

2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 100 I Washington, DC 20006 I T 202.955.3000 I F 202.955.5564 

Holland & Knight LLP I www.hklaw.com 

Anita M. Mosner 

202.419.2604 

anita.mosner@hklaw.com@hklaw.com 

April 20, 2011 

VIA ELECTRONIC AND FIRST-CLASS MAIL 

Ms. Dorothy Y. Beard 

Director, Office of Information Services 

Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

M-30, Room W12-140 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Re: Application of UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. for an Exemption (Sudan), 

Docket OST-2011-

Yesterday, UPS Europe SA and UPS International, Inc. (the "Applicants") filed an Application for an 

exemption from the provisions of the Department's Order No. 98-2-5 ("Sudan Order") so as to 

permit the Applicants to operate a single one-way air freight forwarding movement to Sudan to 

transport a shipment of condoms used to prevent the spread of HIV / AIDS. 

The Applicants polled all persons served with the Application and hereby inform the Department 

that no party has any objection to the Application. Accordingly, the Applicants request that the 

Department grant the Application as soon as possible. 

Attorney for United Parcel Service 

cc: All parties (via e-mail) 

Brett Kruger (via e-mail)
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3192 Received in Senate (RDS)]

<DOC>
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3192

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            October 8, 2015

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
    To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement of 
integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan transactions under 
  the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in 
                  Lending Act, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homebuyers Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT SAFE HARBOR.

    The integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan 
transactions under section 4(a) of the Real Estate Settlement 
Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2603(a)), section 105(b) of the Truth 
in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1604(b)), and regulations issued under such 
sections may not be enforced against any person until February 1, 2016, 
and no suit may be filed against any person for a violation of such 
requirements occurring before such date, so long as such person has 
made a good faith effort to comply with such requirements.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 7, 2015.

            Attest:

                                                 KAREN L. HAAS,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
CWCapital ASSET MANAGEMENT(logo)



Annual Statement as to Compliance

For the Period of January 1, 2018 to December
31, 2018



UBS 2012-C2



In accordance with Item 1123 of Regulation
AB andwith the requirements detailed in §10.11 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement (the “Agreement”)
for the above-mentioned CMBS pool, CWCapital Asset Management LLC (“CWCAM”), in its capacity as Special Servicer,
is providing this Officer’s Certificate with respect to the following:



| | (A) | a review of CWCAM’s activities during the preceding calendar year or portion thereof (the
“Reporting Period”) and of CWCAM’s performance under the Agreement has been made under such officer’s
supervision; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (B) | that, to the best of such officer’s knowledge, based on such review, CWCAM has fulfilled
all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
us.



Sincerely,

CWCapital Asset Management LLC



/s/ James P. Shevlin

James P. Shevlin

President/Chief Operating Officer



7501 Wisconsin Avenue | Suite 500 West | Bethesda,
MD | 20814
# C_2016136EN.01004702.xml

| 18.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 136/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 136/47

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 2 March 2016 — Ruiz Molina v OHIM

(Case F-60/15) (1)

1

((Civil service - Member of the temporary staff - OHIM staff - Fixed-term contract with a termination clause - Clause terminating the contract in the event that the member of staff is not included on a reserve list of a competition - Termination of the contract pursuant to the termination clause - Date on which the termination clause takes effect - Open Competition OHIM/AD/01/13 and OHIM/AST/02/13))

(2016/C 136/67)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: José Luis Ruiz Molina (San Juan de Alicante, Spain) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer, then N. Lhoëst and S. Michiels, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially, B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, then A. Lukošiūtė, Agent, and B. Wägenbauer, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of the decision of the President of OHIM of 4 June 2014 terminating the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff, seeking reinstatement by OHIM, if possible, and, if not, fair financial compensation for the alleged unlawful termination of his contract, and finally for damages for the non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Mr Ruiz Molina is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Mr Ruiz Molina is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay half of the costs incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs);

| 3. | Declares that the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is to bear half of its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Declares that the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is to bear half of its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 213, 29/6/2015, p. 48.

1

---
<partyblock><br><br><div align="center"><b><font size="+1">The People of the State of New York, Respondent,<br><br>against<br><br>Daniel Pray, Appellant.</font></b></div><br><br><p>Appellate Advocates (Laura B. Tatelman), for appellant.Kings County District Attorney (Leonard Joblove and Victor Barall of counsel), for respondent.</p><p>Appeal from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Sharen D. Hudson, J.), rendered December 7, 2015. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of petit larceny. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738 [1967]), seeking leave to withdraw as counsel.</p><p>ORDERED that the judgment of conviction is affirmed.</p><p>We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to <i>Anders v California</i> (386 US 738 [1967]), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (<i>see id.</i>;<i> Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.]</i>, 89 AD3d 252 [2011]; <i>People v Paige</i>, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; <i>cf. People v Gonzalez</i>, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]).</p><p>PESCE, P.J., ALIOTTA and ELLIOT, JJ., concur.</p><br>ENTER:<br>Paul Kenny<br>Chief Clerk<br>Decision Date: February 09, 2018<br><br><div align="center"><form method="LINK" action="../../slipidx/at_2_idxtable.shtml"><input type="submit" value="Return to Decision List"></form></div></partyblock>