alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RESOLUTIONS

                  DIRECTORS' RETIREMENT PLAN 
    
                       December 5, 1996

     RESOLVED, that the Potlatch Corporation Directors' Retirement
Plan (the "Plan") is terminated effective December 31, 1996; and 
be it further

     RESOLVED, that notwithstanding any contrary provision of the
Plan, (1) the present value of the accrued benefits of each
Eligible Director (as defined in the Plan) shall be calculated as
of December 31, 1996, as provided in Section 14(a) of the Potlatch
Corporation Salaried Employees' Retirement Plan, giving each
Eligible Director credit for the lesser of ten years or actual
years of service upon reaching mandatory retirement age; (2) such
present value shall be converted into Stock Units by dividing such
present value by the closing price of the Corporation's common
stock on December 31, 1996 as reported in the New York Stock
Exchange, Inc., composite transactions report for such date;
(3) such Stock Units shall be credited to a special account for
each Eligible Director which shall be administered in accordance
with the terms of the Potlatch Corporation Deferred Compensation
Plan for Directors, except that if the Eligible Director has
completed fewer than 10 years of service as an Eligible Director
on December 31, 1996, then only the amount of the special account
attributable to actual service as an Eligible Director shall be
vested as of December 31, 1996, and the balance of the special
account shall vest in equal installments on each December 31
thereafter until the Eligible Director completes 10 years of
service as an Eligible Director or retires from the board,
whichever is first; and (4) other than the provision of special
Stock Units as described above, no amounts shall be payable to an
Eligible Director pursuant to the Plan; and be it further

     RESOLVED, that Appendix A to the Potlatch Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors shall be adopted
effective December 31, 1996, in the form of the document attached
to these resolutions, to provide for the special Stock Units
described in the preceding resolution.

                                             Exhibit (10)(h)(i)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00460-CR

Allen F. Calton

v.

The State of Texas

§

§

§

§

§

From the 213th District Court

of Tarrant County (0843168D)

February 13, 2014

Per Curiam

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

the appeal should be dismissed. It is ordered that the appeal is dismissed for 

want of jurisdiction.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

PER CURIAM
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 189 (Monday, September 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79651]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22557]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

    The National Science Board hereby gives notice of the scheduling of 
a teleconference of the National Science Board/National Science 
Foundation Commission on Merit Review (MRX) for the transaction of 
National Science Board business pursuant to the NSF Act and the 
Government in the Sunshine Act.

TIME AND DATE: The MRX meeting is scheduled for Thursday, October 3, 
2024, from 3:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m. EDT.

PLACE: This meeting will be via videoconference through the National 
Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The agenda is: Commission Chair's remarks 
about the agenda; Discussion of Preliminary Implementation Suggestions; 
Vote for Approval of Preliminary Implementation Suggestions; and 
Commission Chair's closing remarks.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Point of contact for this meeting 
is: Chris Blair, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6201000e030b10220c11044c050d14"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e083828c818992a08e9386ce878f96">[email protected]</span></a>, 703/292-7000. Meeting information and 
updates may be found at www.nsf.gov/nsb.

Christopher Blair,
Executive Assistant to the National Science Board Office.
[FR Doc. 2024-22557 Filed 9-26-24; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 13.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 The undersigned, Tim Hunt, of Hunt Mining Corp, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 (1)
The annual report on Form 20-F of Hunt Mining Corp for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Hunt Mining Corp.
  Date:  April 30, 2015
 
 /s/ Tim Hunt
 Tim Hunt
 President, Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman
 (Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hunt Mining Corp and will be retained by Hunt Mining Corp and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20
- 0577 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. RUSSELL DEAN KORTAN ,

Defendant and Appellant .

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time to and including April 26 , 2021 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

April 5 2021

04/05/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0577
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2


SECOND AMENDMENT TO 
OFFICER EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




This Second Amendment to Officer Employment Agreement ("Second Amendment") is entered into effective August 7, 2017, by and between Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation (the "Company") and Brian P. Lynch ("Employee").


A.    The Company and Employee are parties to that certain Officer Employment Agreement entered into as of June 1, 2012, as amended on March 24, 2014 (collectively, the "Agreement").


B.    The Company and Employee desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to Section 10(b) of the Agreement.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other consideration, the value and sufficiency of which are acknowledged, the Company and Employee agree as follows:


1.Title.  Section 2 of the Agreement is amended to read:


“Employee shall serve as Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, of the Company.  Employee's duties shall be the usual and customary duties of the offices in which Employee serves.  Employee shall report to the Chief Executive Officer, or such other person as the Chief Executive Officer shall designate from time to time.  The Board of Directors and/or the Chief Executive Officer of the Company may change employee’s title, position and/or duties at any time.”


		
	2.
	Compensation.  Sections 4(a) and (b) of the Agreement are amended to read:




“(a)    Base Salary.  In accordance with the Company’s usual review and pay practices, the Company agrees to pay Employee a base salary of no less than $400,000.00 per year (prorated for any partial years of employment), payable in equal installments on regularly scheduled Company pay dates.  Employee agrees that the Company may increase Employee’s base salary without requiring an amendment of this Agreement through the use of a Personnel Action Notice.  


(b)    Annual Incentive.  The Company shall provide Employee an opportunity to earn an annual incentive payment based upon participation in the Company’s applicable incentive plan as it may or may not exist from time to time.  Employee’s incentive target percentage is sixty-five percent (65%) of Employee’s annual base salary.  Any annual incentive payment earned pursuant to an applicable incentive plan shall be payable in the first quarter of the following year.”


The balance of Section 4 shall remain unchanged.


3.    But for the amendments contained herein, and any other written amendments properly executed by the parties, the Agreement shall otherwise remain unchanged.













IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Second Amendment effective as of the date first set forth above.  


	
			
	EMPLOYEE
	 
	COMPANY

	 
	 
	Callaway Golf Company, a Delaware corporation

	 
	 
	 

	/s/ Brian P. Lynch
	 
	By: /s/ Chris Carroll

	Brian P. Lynch
	 
	Chris Carroll

	 
	 
	Senior Vice President, Global Human Resources
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Group

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 95-411 Date: October 26, 1995 

SUBJECT: FEHB Open Season: Notice of Plan Withdrawal

This is to alert you to the fact that Key Health Plan (code GH) is withdrawing from the

FEHB program effective December 31, 1995. Unfortunately, the FEHB Guides had

already gone to print when the decision to withdraw was made and the plan's name

does appear in the Guides. The plan will send notices of the withdrawal to its

enrollees, but enrollees in this plan who do not change health plans during open

season will not have health benefits for 1996.

If you have field installations in the North/Central Indiana area, please notify them

directly of the plan's withdrawal. With the beginning of open season less than three

weeks away, it is extremely important that they are notified of the withdrawal as soon as

possible.

Thank you for your assistance.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy and

 Information Division
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 32 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 H. R. 32

 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to expand the definition 
 of an unauthorized alien to include aliens who have not been admitted 
  to and are not lawfully present in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 6, 2015

 Mr. Barletta introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to expand the definition 
 of an unauthorized alien to include aliens who have not been admitted 
  to and are not lawfully present in the United States, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defense of Legal Workers Act of 
2015''.

SEC. 2. ADMISSION AND LAWFUL PRESENCE REQUIRED FOR EMPLOYMENT 
              AUTHORIZATION.

    Section 274A(h)(3) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 
1324a(h)(3)) is amended--
            (1) by inserting before ``authorized to be so employed by 
        this Act'' the following: ``an alien otherwise admitted to and 
        lawfully present in the United States, and''; and
            (2) by inserting at the end the following: ``An alien 
        without lawful status shall be considered to be an unauthorized 
        alien for purposes of this Act.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### In the Matter of the Estate of Mary A. Kilmer, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

January 24, 1958.

*Gifford, Woody, Carter & Ilays*for Irving Trust Company, as trustee, petitioner.

*Solomon Weiss,*special guardian for Mary A. Cooper, an incompetent, respondent.

S. Samuel Di Falco, S.

In this proceeding for the judicial settlement of an intermediate account a request has been made for the construction of paragraph second C of the will of the testatrix which reads as follows: “ I direct the sum of Fifteen Hundred ($1500) dollars to be spent annually on account and in behalf of my Niece, Mrs. mary Adelaide tombo (wife of Rudolf Tombo, Jr.) who is now an inmate of St. Vincent’s Retreat, Harrison, New York, during the continuance of her natural life and that sufficient of the principal of my estate be set apart as a separate trust to provide such annuity from, the income thereof. The object or purpose of this bequest is to provide a sum of money to meet pay the expenses, &c. of her confinement in the above institution or a similar institution and to provide her with all necessary comforts and conveniences, care and attention, while so confined. ’ ’

Two questions have been raised. 1. Can the principal of the trust fund be invaded to make up the disparity between the actual annual income and the annuity bequest of $1,500 annually? 2. Can the principal of the trust fund be invaded without limitation to the sum of $1,500 per annum to provide the sum of money necessary to maintain the'incompetent at the institution as indicated by the second sentence of the trust paragraph?

*158The testatrix herein died on March 28, 1911 leaving a will dated March 4, 1911. At that time her niece, the beneficiary of this trust, had been confined to St. Vincent’s Hospital for two' years.

It can be clearly seen from a reading of the paragraph sought to be construed that it was the intention of the testatrix to create a life annuity of $1,500 per annum for the benefit of her unfortunate niece. The courts have consistently held that when by the terms of the will a life annuity has been created and the income of the trust is not sufficient to produce such annual amount, the principal of the trust may be invaded to make up the difference between the actual income and the amount bequeathed annually. *(Matter of Kidd,*142 Misc. 512; *Pierrepont*v. *Edwards,*25 N. Y. 128; *Matter of Sidenberg,*147 Misc. 742; *Matter of Weir,*172 Misc. 74; *Matter of Green,*271 App. Div. 171.)

As to the second question raised, I find that the principal of the trust cannot be invaded for any amount beyond the $1,500 bequeathed annually by the testatrix. While I sympathize with the object of a ruling to the contrary which is sought by the special guardian and even though: the remainderman herself seems to consent to such a construction, this court cannot by its ruling change the terms of the will or destroy the testamentary provision. *(Matter of Sullard,*247 App. Div. 761; *Matter of Wentworth,*230 N. Y. 176.)

Submit decree on notice settling the account accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Daytona Systems, Inc.,  (the "Company") for the year ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Meuse, President and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Joseph Meuse

---------------------------

Joseph Meuse

President and Chief Executive Officer

February 7, 2010
# C_2021297EN.01002301.xml

| 26.7.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 297/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.7.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 297/23

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) lodged on 10 May 2021 — État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines v Navitours SARL

(Case C-294/21)

(2021/C 297/26)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: État du Grand-duché de Luxembourg, Administration de l’enregistrement et des domaines

Respondent: Navitours SARL

Questions referred

Does (do) Article 2(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, (1) which provides that “the following shall be subject to value added tax: 1. the supply of goods or services effected for consideration within the territory of the country by a taxable person acting as such

and/or Article 9(2)(b) of Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, which provides that “the place where transport services are supplied shall be the place where the transport takes place, having regard to the distances covered

apply and entail the levying of VAT in Luxembourg on the passenger transport services carried out by a service provider established in Luxembourg, where those services are performed within a condominium, as that condominium is defined in the Treaty between the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Federal Republic of Germany on the demarcation of the common border between those two States and the exchange of letters, signed in Luxembourg on 19 December 1984, as being a joint territory under the joint sovereignty of the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Federal Republic of Germany and in relation to which there is no agreement relating to the collection of VAT on supplies of transport services between those two States, such as provided for in Article 5(1) of the Treaty between the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg and the Federal Republic of Germany on the demarcation of the common border between those two States of 19 December 1984, pursuant to which ‘the Contracting States shall settle matters concerning the law applicable in the joint territory under joint sovereignty by means of an additional agreement’?

---

(1)  OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1.

---
FILED

March 30, 1998

Cecil W. Crowson

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT NASHVILLE

JANUARY 1996 SESSION

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) NO. 01C01-9506-CC-00182

)

Appellee, ) Giles County

)

VS. ) Honorable James L. Weatherford, Judge 

)

JOHNNY WAYNE TILLERY, ) (Possession of cocaine with the intent to sell)

)

Appellant. )

CONCURRING OPINION

I fully concur with the opinion. I would add that the opinion of our

supreme court in State v. Jones, 598 S.W.2d 209 (Tenn. 1980), supports the

conclusion reached by this court even though all of the recorded statements were

allowed into evidence. In Jones, the supreme court warned that "any statement

made by a non testifying party to the conversation which tends to be prejudicial to

the defendant must be redacted, unless admissible under some other rule of law." 

Id. at 223. Here, however, the challenged portions of Brooks's statements are not

prejudicial. When Brooks made assurances that he was responsible and that the

defendant should not "take the fall," that tended to be more exculpatory, in my view,

than incriminatory. Because there was no prejudice, there could have been no

error. 

_________________________________

Gary R. Wade, Judge
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derold L. Kelley, President, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Date:           May 16, 2011
 /s/Derold L. Kelley
 Derold L. Kelley
 President, Secretary/Treasurer and Director
# Official Journal C 239/20 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 239 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6320 July 2020 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 239

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6320 July 2020

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2020/C 239/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management – Section I: European Parliament – Financial year 2019 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2020/C 239/01

Report on budgetary and financial management – Section I: European Parliament – Financial year 2019

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN