CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST (Electronic Format) ***** TO BE COMPLETED BY DISTRICT A ND RETURNED TO A** **RB ***** All rules submitted to the EPA as State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions mu st be supported by certain information and documentation for the rule packages to be deemed complete for review by the EPA. Rules will not be evaluated for approvability by

the EPA unless the submittal packages are complete. To assist yo u in determining that all necessary materials are included in rules packages sent to the ARB for subm ittal to the EPA, please fill out the following form and include it with the rule package you send ARB. See the ARB's Guidelines on the Implementation of the 40 CFR 51, Appendix V, for a mo re detailed explanation than is provided here. Adopted rules and rule am endm ents should be checked against U.S. EPA's Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule Deficiencies (Little Blue Book, August 21, 2001) to ensure that they contain no elements which will result in disapproval by EPA. District: Yolo

-Solano AQMD Rule No : 2.22 Rule Title: Gasoline Dispensing Facilities Date Adopted or Amended: January 14, 2015 **ADM INISTRA** 

**TIVE M AT**  **ERIA LS**  Note: All documents should be in electronic format. Items that have signatures, initials, or stamps may be scanned.

**Not At** **tached At** **tached N/A**  **COM PLETE**  **COPY OF**  **THE RULE:**  Provide an unmarked copy of the entire rule as adopted or amended by your District Board. **UNDERLINE AN**  **D STRIKEOU**  **T COPY**  **OF THE**  **RULE** : If an am ended rule, provide a complete copy of the rule indicating in underline and strikeout format all language which has been added, deleted, or changed since the rule was last adopted or amended. **COM PLETE**  **COPY OF**  **THE REFERENCED**  **RULE(S):** For any rule which includes language specifically referencing another rule, a copy of that other rule mu st also be submitted, unless it has already been s ubm itted to EPA as part of a previous SIP submittal. **PUBLIC NOTICE**  **EVIDENCE:** Include a copy of the local newspaper clipping certification(s), stating the date of publication, which must be at least 30 days before the hearing. As an alternative, include a copy of the actual p ublished notice of the public hearing as it appeared in the local newspaper(s). In this case, however, enough of the newspaper page mu st be included to show the date of publication. T he notice mu st specifically identify by title and number each rule adopted or amended. **RESOLUTION/MINUTE ORDER:**  Provide the Board Clerk certified resolution or mi nute order. T his document mu st include certification that the hearing was held in accordance with the information in th e public notice. I t mu st also list the rules that were adopted or am ended, the date of the public hearing, and a statement of compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 40725

-40728 (Administrative Procedures Act). **PUBLIC COMMENTS**  **AN D**  **RESPONSES:** Subm it copies of written public comments made during the notice period and at the public hearing. Also submit any written responses prepared by the District staff or presented to the District Board at the public hearing. A s ummary

of the public comments and responses is adequate. If there were no comments made during the notice period or at the hearing, please indicate N/A to the left.5/1/2002 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD 

### SIP COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST (Electronic Format)

**TECHNICA L M**  **AT ERI** **AL S** 

**Not At** **tached At** **tached N/A**  **RULE EVA** **LUA TION**  **FORM:** See instructions for completing the Rule Evaluation Form and the accompanying sample form. **NON -** **EPA**

**T EST**  **ME THODS:**  Attach all test methods that are referenced in yo ur rule that do not appear in 40 CFR 51, 60, 6 1, 63, or have not been previously submitted to EPA. E PA methods used in other media such as SW 846 for solid waste are not automatically approved for air pollution applications. S ubm ittal of test methods that are not EPA

-approved should include the information and follow the procedure described in Region 9’s “Test Method Review & Evaluation Process.” **MODELING SUPPORT:**  Provide if appropriate. I n general, modeling support is not required for VOC and NOx rules to determine their im pacts on ozone levels. M odeling is required where a rule is a relaxation that affects large sources (> 100 TPY) in an attainment area for SO2, directly em itted PM10, CO, or NOx (for NO2 purposes). I n cases where EPA is concerned with the im pact on air quality of rule revisions which relax limits or cause a shift in em ission patterns in a nonattainment area, a reference back to the approved SIP will be sufficient provided the approved SIP accounts for the relaxation and provided the approved SIP used the current EPA modeling guidelines. I f current EPA modeling guidelines were not used, then new modeling may be required. **ECONOMIC AND**  **TECHNICA L**  **JUSTIFICA TION**  **FOR DEVIA** 

**TIONS FROM**  **EPA P** **OLICIES** : T he District staff report or other information included with the submittal should discuss all potential relaxations or deviations from RACT, RACM, BACT, BACM, enforceability, attainment, RFP, or other relevant EPA requirements. T his includes, for example, dem onstrating that exemptions or em ission lim its less stringent than the presumptive RACT (e.g., a CTG) meet EPA’s 5 percent policy, and dem onstrating that all source categories exempted from a RACM/BACM rule are de mi nimus according to EPA’s RACM/BACM policy. **AD DITIONA** **L MA** 

**TERIA LS**  : P rovide District staff reports and any other supporting information concerning development of the rule or rule changes. This information should explain the basis for all limits and thresholds contained in the rule.