alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### WARE v. STATE.

No. 16331.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 8, 1933.

M. E: Gates, of Huntsville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. *-

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for murder; punishment assessed being 10 years in the penitentiary.

The indictment is in proper form. No bills of exception or statement of facts appear in the record. In such condition nothing is presented for review, save that we note in passing sentence upon appellant the court overlooked giving him the benefit of the indeterminate sentence law, directing that he be-confined in the penitentiary for 10 years. The sentence is amended, directing that appellant be confined in the penitentiary for not less than 2, nor more than 10, years.

As thus reformed, the judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit35.2

SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
BARCLAYS DRYROCK ISSUANCE TRUST



In connection with the Annual Report on Form
10-K of Barclays Dryrock Issuance Trust for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2021 (the “Report”), the undersigned, a duly
authorized officer of Barclays Bank PLC (the “Servicer”), does hereby certify and represent that:

1.       A
review of the activities and performance of the Servicer under the Services Agreement, dated as of July 31, 2012, by and between Barclays
Bank Delaware and the Servicer (the “Agreement”) during the period that is the subject of the Report has been made under my
supervision.

2.       To
the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
respects throughout the period that is the subject of the Report.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly
executed this Servicer Compliance Statement this 25th of March 2022.













| | BARCLAYS BANK PLC
| | -----------------
| |                  
| | By:
#### H. C. GLENN, Receiver of Temple Trust Company, and W. A. Holt, Sheriff, Appellants, v. W. E. CONNELL, Receiver of H. H. Hardin, Appellee.

No. 1383.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

June 22, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1934.

Critz & Woodward, of Coleman, and Jno. B. Daniel, of Temple, for appellants.

Billingsley & Billingsley, of Fort Worth, and Oxford & McMillan,'of Stephenville, for appellee.

LESLIE, Justice!

The above styled and numbered cause is a companion case to that of H. C. Glenn, Receiver of Temple Trust Company, and Frank Mills, Sheriff, v. W. E. Connell, Receiver of H. H. Hardin (No. 1382) 74 S.W.(2d) 451. Except as to parties and tracts of land involved, the two cases are practically identical on the facts as disclosed by the record,- and the law points presented are the same.

In cause No. 1382, this court this day hands down a written opinion upon the propositions of law presented, and that opinion disposes of the like questions presented by this appeal. For the same reasons there assigned for the reversal of the judgment of the trial court in that case, the judgment of the trial court in the instant case will be reversed and the cause remanded. It is so ordered.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Trust.
  By:
    
    /s/ DAVID A. VANASKEY, JR.Name:
    
    David A. Vanaskey, Jr.Title:
    
    Vice President WilmingtonTrust Company
Exhibit 34.2

Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors
Citibank, N.A.:



We have examined management’s
assertion, included in the accompanying Management’s Assertion of Compliance, that the Agency and Trust division of Citibank,
N.A. (the “Company”) complied with the servicing criteria set forth in Item 1122(d) of the Securities and Exchange
Commission’s Regulation AB for publicly-issued (i.e., transaction-level reporting initially required under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) and certain privately issued (i.e., for which transaction-level reporting is required pursuant
to contractual obligation) automobile loan or lease-backed securities, equipment loan-backed securities and student loan-backed
securities issued on or after January 1, 2006 for which the Company provides trustee and paying agent services (the “Platform”),
except for servicing criteria 1122(d)(1)(i)-1122(d)(1)(iv), 1122(d)(2)(i), 1122(d)(2)(iii), 1122(d)(2)(vi)-1122(d)(2)(vii), 1122(d)(3)(i)
and 1122(d)(4)(i)-1122(d)(4)(xv), which the Company has determined are not applicable to the activities it performs with respect
to the Platform, as of and for the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance
with the servicing criteria. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s
compliance based on our examination.



Our examination was conducted in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)and, accordingly, included examining,
on a test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the servicing criteria specified above and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. Our examination included testing selected asset-backed transactions
and securities that comprise the Platform, testing selected servicing activities related to the Platform, and determining whether
the Company processed those selected transactions and performed those selected activities in compliance with the servicing criteria.
Furthermore, our procedures were limited to the selected transactions and servicing activities performed by the Company during
the period covered by this report. Our procedures were not designed to determine whether errors may have occurred either prior
to or subsequent to our tests that may have affected the balances or amounts calculated or reported by the Company during the period
covered by this report for the selected transactions or any other transactions. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Company’s compliance with the servicing
criteria.



In our opinion, management’s
assertion that the Company complied with the aforementioned servicing criteria as of and for the twelve months ended December 31,
2012 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ KPMG LLP



Chicago, Illinois
February 28, 2013
#### ARMSTRONG v. ARMSTRONG.

No. 1854.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Eastland.

Nov. 18, 1938.

E. A. Martin, of Longview, for appellant.

Sadler & Lattimore, of Longview, for appellee. • ■

GRISSOM, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment granting appellee a divorce. The statement of facts and transcript were filed in the Court of Civil Appeals at Tex-arkana November 16, 1937. The case was transferred to this court by order of the' Supreme Court. The cause was submitted in this court September 30, 1938.

Appellant has failed to file assignments of errors and briefs as required by Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38. No effort to show good cause -for such failure has been made. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed by this court on its own motion. Court of Civil Appeals Rule 38; Du Bose v. Mercantile Bank & Trust Co. of Texas, Tex.Civ.App., 67 S.W.2d 1066; Harding v. Stith, Tex.Civ.App., 88 S.W.2d 528; Sisk v. Steves Sash & Door Co., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 788; Trustees of Dist. No. 26 v. County Board, etc., Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 1041; Williamson v. Pulliam, Tex.Civ.App., 89 S.W.2d 799; Miller v. Banks, Tex.Civ.App., 276 S.W. 768; Tsutomu Dyo v. Smith, Tex.Civ.App., 249 S.W. 541; Prairie Oil & Gas Co. v. Curry, Tex.Civ.App., 251 S.W. 559; 3 Tex.Jur. 926.

The appeal is dismissed.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4806-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Florida (FEMA-4806-DR), dated August 10, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATES:

This amendment was issued August 30, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice is hereby given that the incident period for this disaster is closed effective August 27, 2024.

                        The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to                               ( print page 80583)                            Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.                    

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-22839 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
EXHIBIT 10.1


 


Date: November 8, 2017


 


Revised Collaboration Agreement


 


 


Further to the Collaboration Agreement dated
April 7, 2017 between MSNI (M) Sdn Bhd (“MSNI”) and Monspacemall Sdn Bhd (“Monspacemall”), both parties
hereby agree to revise MSNI’s revenue formula:


 


FROM the current 50% of profits generated by
the business of monspacemall.com;


 


TO the revised 6.5% of sales generated by the
business of monspacemall.com.


 


This revision shall take effect retroactively
as of August 1, 2017 .


 


All other clauses not specifically mentioned
herein shall remain in force as per the Collaboration Agreement.


 


 


REVISION AGREED BY PARTIES BELOW.


 


 


MSNI (M) SDN BHD


 





	/s/ Low Koon Poh	 	 
	Director	 	 
	 	 	 
	MONSPACEMALL SDN BHD	 	 
	 	 	 
	/s/ Wong Tat Foong	 	 
	Director
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           2,953
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      380
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,988
<PP&E>                                             573
<DEPRECIATION>                                     444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   3,559
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              188
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           848
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     3,559
<SALES>                                            323
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   468
<CGS>                                              562
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   789
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   4
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (887)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (887)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   1,482
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       595
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .56
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .56
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1.3

CERTIFICATION

I, T.
Patrick Kelly, principal financial officer of Hawker Beechcraft Acquisition Company, LLC (the Company), hereby certify that:



|(1) | The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|/s/ T. Patrick Kelly                          
|T. Patrick Kelly (Principal
Financial Officer)

May 5, 2011
United States 

Office of 

Personnel Management 

The Federal Government’s Human Resources Agency

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 09-306 Date: October 2009 

Subject: 2010 FEHB Withholdings and Contribution Rates 

The official Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) Program withholdings and contribution 

rates for 2010 are available in a PDF file format on the OPM web site at 

http://www.opm.gov/insure/health/rates/index.asp. These are the only rates agency payroll providers 

should use to update their systems and are effective for pay periods beginning after December 31, 

2009. 

The FEHB withholdings and contribution rates also are available in an ASCII and Excel file format. 

If you are a subscriber to "FINPAY" listserv, you will receive these files. If you are not a FINPAY 

subscriber and want these files, please email us at finance@opm.gov using “Want FEHB Rates” as 

the subject. We will email you the rate files. 

If you have questions about this letter, we recommend sending an email to finance@opm.gov. 

You also may call us on 202-606-0606. 

 Keith Willingham 

 Associate Chief Financial Officer 

 Center for Financial Services
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17
- 6485

MARK JAMES KONSAVICH , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. MEEKS, Warden FCI Williamsburg , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken

. R. Bryan Harwell , District Judge. ( 1:16

- cv
- 01829

- RBH )

Submitted : July 27, 2017 Decided: August 1, 2017

Before AGEE and FLOYD , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Mark James Konsavich , Appellant Pro Se

.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Mark James Konsavich appeals the district court’s order adopti ng the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Konsavich leave to proceed in forma pauper is, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Konsavich v. Meeks , No. 1:16

- cv
- 01829

- RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this cour t and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Page 51 of 51

EXHIBIT 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief
Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its Staff upon request.

|Date:   March 10, 2005 |                                     | /s/   R. F. Lieble | 
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------- | ------------------ | 
|                       |                                    
|                       | R. F. LiebleChief Financial Officer |                   

---
II 

Calendar No. 256 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 322 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Reported by Mr. JOHNSON, without amendment 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, 

Missouri, as the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SGT. ZACHARY M. FISHER POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in 

6 Chesterfield, Missouri, shall be known and designated as 

7 the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 322 RS

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fish5 er Post Office’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 256 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 322 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States PostM. Fisher Post Office’’. in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary al Service located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road 

OCTOBER 8, 2015 

Reported without amendment 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Item 6.   SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

       ($Thousands, except per share amounts)

                             1997       1996       1995       1994       1993  
<TABLE>
<S>                        <C>       <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>   
Revenues                   $  915    $   915    $   918    $   917    $   917
Income available for
distribution                  835        822        828        831        833
Net income                    835        822        828        831        833
Total assets                9,189      9,170      9,174      9,185      9,183
Per share amounts:
  Net income                  .55        .54        .55        .55        .55
  Income available for
    distribution              .55        .54        .55        .55        .55
  Cash dividend               .54        .55        .55        .55        .55
</TABLE>
Item 7.   MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
             AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

       All of the Registrant's railroad properties are leased to Norfolk and
Western Railway Company ("N&W") for 99 years, with unlimited renewals on the
same terms.  Cash rental is a fixed amount of $915,000 per year, with no 
provision for change.  This cash rental, and small amounts of interest
income, are the only source of funds.  Although the lease provides for
additional rentals to be recorded, these amounts do not increase cash flow
as they are charged to N&W's settlement account with no requirement for 
payment.

       Revenues were the same in 1997 as in 1996, and income available for
distribution was higher in 1997 than in 1996.

       Registrant's only cash outlays, other than dividend payments, are for
general and administrative expenses, which were slightly lower in 1997 than in
1996.  The leased properties are maintained entirely
at N&W's expense.

       Since cash revenue is fixed in amount and outlays for expenses are 
relatively modest, inflation has had no material impact on Registrant's 
reported net income.
MARLON DWAYNE WILLIAMS

,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 3836

_ ____________________________/

Opinion filed May 11, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Duval County

. Marianne L. Aho , Judge

.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender,

Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WETHERELL

, OSTERHAUS

, and M.K. THOMAS

, J J

. , CONCUR.