alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3001 

To authorize certain long-term contracts for Federal purchases of energy. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 9, 2015 

Mr. WELCH (for himself, Mr. GIBSON, and Mr. CARTWRIGHT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government 

Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize certain long-term contracts for Federal 

purchases of energy. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Renewable Energy 

5 Certainty Act’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3001 IH

1 SEC. 2. CONTRACTS FOR FEDERAL PURCHASES OF EN2 ERGY. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part 3 of title V of the National 

4 Energy Conservation Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 8251 et seq.) 

5 is amended by adding at the end the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 554. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS FOR ENERGY. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding section 

8 501(b)(1)(B) of title 40, United States Code, a Federal 

9 agency may enter into a contract for the acquisition of 

10 renewable energy or energy from cogeneration facilities 

11 covering a period of not more than 30 years. 

12 ‘‘(b) STANDARDIZED ENERGY PURCHASE AGREE13 MENT.—Not later than 90 days after the date of enact14 ment of this section, the Secretary, through the Federal 

15 Energy Management Program, shall publish a standard16 ized energy purchase agreement, setting forth commercial 

17 terms and conditions, that Federal agencies may use to 

18 acquire renewable energy or energy from cogeneration fa19 cilities. 

20 ‘‘(c) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary shall 

21 provide technical assistance to assist Federal agencies in 

22 implementing this section.’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3001 IH

1 (b) TABLE OF CONTENTS AMENDMENT.—The table 

2 of contents for such Act is amended by adding at the end 

3 of the items relating to such part 3 the following new item: 

‘‘Sec. 554. Long-term contracts for energy.’’. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
TOTAL GHG EMISSIONS OF THE U.S. UNDER DIFFERENT SCENARIOS 

8,000 

7,000 — 

.... - -.. 

ea 

I. 

N 6,000 

0 

V 

~ 5,000 

~ 

c 0m 4,000 

~ 

3,000 

C7 

_ 

~ 2,000 

7i 

... 

0 

1,000 f 

0 

1990 1995 2000 2005 

—Historic emissions, excl. LULUCF 

2013 Current Policy projections 

Updated Current Policy projections 

including US Clean Power Plan 

Pledge pathway 

i_ -r -- - .- ..~._._~— ~_ - 1 

2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 

Source: Bill Hare, Marie Lindberg, et al. Below 2 degrees C or 1.5 degrees C depends on rapid action from both 

Annex I and Non-Annex I countries, Climate Action Tracker, Policy Brief, June 4, 2014-revised June 7, 2014. 
(u 2.5 ' 

O 

i 

O ~ 0 

U 

~ 

~ 15 

. y -., 

., .• 

~' •. • •. 

'•.• ' •• .. 

• ~ . ' • •• . •. ~ • . 

.• 

•~,~—_ 

.~ 

1.0 

o.s 

0.0 J 

2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 

Carbon Intensity (CO2 / Energy) 

3.5 

mm 

—Historical Emissions 

—2013 Current Policy projections 

(CAT assessment) 

~Updated Current Policy 

projections including US Clean 

Power Plan (CAT assessment) 

• • • • Likely 2•C pathway for 

decarbonization 

• • • • High probablility 2.0•C 

decarbonization pathway/ 1.5'C 

by 2100 

Source: Bill Hare, Marie Lindberg, et al. Below 2 degrees C or 1.5 degrees C depends on rapid action from both 

Annex I and Non-Annex I countries, Climate Action Tracker, Policy Brief, June 4, 2014-revised June 7, 2014.
##### 



EXHIBIT 31.2
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1)
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Spectra Energy Partners, LP;
 2)
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report;
 3)
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;
 4)
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information
relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andc)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and
 5)
    
    The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect
the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    /s/    Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007, each of the undersigned, Lawrence J. LeBon, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John LeBlanc, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                   |  | 
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence J. LeBon, III                        |  | 
|                      |  |     |  | Lawrence J. LeBon, III                            |  | 
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer             |  | 
|                      |  |     | 
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ John LeBlanc                                  |  | 
|                      |  |     |  | John LeBlanc                                      |  | 
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |  | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 in his capacity of Chief Financial Officer of Belvedere SoCal (the Company) that, to
my knowledge, (a) the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) that the
information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and the results of operations of the Company for such period.



|                        |  |                        
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: November 23, 2007 |  | /s/ Jae Lim            
|                        |  | Jae Lim                
|                        |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Belvedere SoCal, and will be retained by
Belvedere SoCal and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 31(c)****RULE13a — 14(a)/15d — 14(a) CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**I, Sherrill Stone, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Peerless Mfg. Co., certifythat:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of PeerlessMfg. Co.; 2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as definedin Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controlsand procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and proceduresto be designed under oursupervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating tothe registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during theperiod in which this report isbeing prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented inthis report our conclusions aboutthe effectiveness of thedisclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report anychange in the registrant’sinternal control over financialreporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likelyto materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the designor operation of internal controlover financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves managementor other employees who have asignificant role in theregistrant’s internal controlsover financial reporting.       /s/ Sherrill Stone Sherrill Stone    Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer    Date: October 28, 2005  
22
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-1003

_____________________________

LAMONT ASBERRY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Steven B. Whittington, Judge.

March 5, 2019

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

WOLF, MAKAR, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Lamont Asberry, pro se, Appellant.
2

Ashley B. Moody, Attorney General, and Sharon S. Traxler, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

s1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

138833 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 138833 

 COA: 281188 

Ingham CC: 06-001354-FH 

DONALD RICHARD BLOWERS, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 12, 2009 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### PRIVITT v. MOOSE et al.

No. 13956.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Sept. 22, 1939.

Clyde Suddath, of Henrietta, for appellants.

Houston McMurry, of Henrietta, for ap-pellee.

BROWN, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant, Ada Privitt, on a note and chattel mortgage given to secure same, and made no mention of the status of the defendant, but Ada Privitt, joined by her husband, answered that the note and mortgage were executed by Ada Privitt without the knowledge or consent of her husband, J. W. Privitt; that the debt was not incurred for any of .the purposes for which a married woman could-bind herself or her separate estate and was not for “necessaries”, and that the chattel mortgage was given on property belonging to the community.

The appellee — plaintiff below — made no effort to plead any fact on which judgment. could.be had against Ada Privitt, or her husband, J. W. Privitt; in fact, the husband was not made a party defendant and no judgment was sought against him.

The cause being tried to the’ court, it was (found that Ada Privitt was a married woman when she executed the note and mortgage; that her disabilities of cover-ture have not been removed; that the personal property so mortgaged is a part of the community estate; “that said note and mortgage were executed for the purpose of defendants repairing certain personal property and as security for a personal loan, and was not necessaries furnished defendants or defendant’s children”; that the note and mortgage were executed by Ada Privitt “without the consent or knowledge of her husband, J. W. Privitt, and there is no direct evidence as to the date that he discovered the execution of same.”

With these findings in hand, the trial court gave the- plaintiff — appellee—a judgment for debt and' foreclosure of the chattel mortgage lien against both Ada Privitt and J. W. Privitt.

No statement of facts accompanies the record.

In the light of such a record, it becomes our duty to reverse the judgment of the trial court and render judgment here for appellants. It is so ordered.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    /s/    Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Lon C. Mitchell, Jr.Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 78967]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21987]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12554]


Notice of Public Meeting: International Information and 
Communications Policy Division Stakeholder Briefing

ACTION: Notice of public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State Department will hold a public meeting at 1 p.m.-2:30 
p.m. (ET) on WebEx with the Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital Policy's 
International Information and Communications Policy (CDP/ICP) division. 
The purpose of the meeting is to brief stakeholders on CDP/ICP's past 
and upcoming international engagements. These include engagement at the 
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the Organization of 
American States Inter-American Telecommunication Commission (CITEL), 
the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), the 
Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Forum Telecommunications and 
Information Working Group, the Group of Seven (G7) Digital & Tech 
Working Group, the Group of Twenty (G20) Digital Economy Task Force, 
and other multilateral processes and bilateral digital and ICT 
dialogues.

DATES: The meeting will be on October 9, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please contact Coreene White, Foreign 
Affairs Officer, CDP/ICP, at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5b0c33322f3e181e1b282f3a2f3e753c342d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="1e4976776a7b5d5b5e6d6a7f6a7b30797168">[email protected]</span></a> or 771-205-9909.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Additional information about the Bureau of 
Cyberspace and Digital Policy is accessible at https://www.state.gov/bureaus-offices/deputy-secretary-of-state/bureau-of-cyberspace-and-digital-policy/.
    We encourage anyone wanting to attend this virtual meeting to 
register using the following link by 5 p.m. Monday, October 7: https://statedept.webex.com/statedept/j.php?MTID=m5a8fd865411e9795f1b79405cceed2ed.
    Requests for reasonable accommodation made after Wednesday, October 
2 will be considered but might not be able to be accommodated. The 
public may have an opportunity to provide comments at this meeting.

Agenda

Wednesday, October 9, 2024, at 1:00 p.m. (ET)

Opening Remarks
Briefings on CDP/ICP's past and upcoming activities
Public Comment
Adjournment

Stephan A. Lang,
U.S. Coordinator and Deputy Assistant Secretary, International 
Information and Communications Policy, Bureau of Cyberspace and Digital 
Policy, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-21987 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ivan MELCHOR MORENO and Rigoberto Melchor Moreno, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 75-2957.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Dec. 10, 1976.

Wayne E. Windle, Jr., El Paso, Tex., for Rigoberto Moreno.

Dan L. Armstrong, El Paso, Tex., for Ivan Moreno.

John Clark, U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., Ronald F. Ederer, Michael T. Milligan, Asst. U. S. Attys., El Paso, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.

*

 Of the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.

ON PETITION AND SUPPLEMENTAL PETITION FOR REHEARING

Before WISDOM, GODBOLD and LIVELY *, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In footnote 3 of our opinion we referred to the holding of *United States v. Godkins,*527 F.2d 1321 (CA5, 1976), that the government’s privilege against revealing the identity of an informer may be invoked only when the government seeks to avoid disclosure of an informer’s identity, and we noted that when an accused seeks to subpoena an individual “already known to him” the privilege is irrelevant. This reference to “already known” is to be read in the light of *Godkins,*where the defendant knew the name of the informer. We do not imply that the government’s privilege against revealing identity is irrelevant where all that the defendant knows is that there is an informer (or even an informer that he can describe), and he does not know the name of the informer.

The petition and supplemental petition for rehearing by the United States are OVERRULED.