alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### THORNTON et al. v. THORNTON et al.

No. 12988.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

April 13, 1934.

Rehearing Denied Sept. 14, 1934.

*430Sullivan, Speer & Minor, of Denton, and Fred T. Arnold, of Graham, for appellants.

W. O. Boyd and L. Fulton, both of Denton, for appellees.

LATTIMORE, Justice.

This is on appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege.

Appellants are the son and former wife of appellee, S. L. Thornton, and reside in Young county, Tex. During that marriage those spouses acquired a farm located in Young county, Tex., and thereafter were divorced without a division of that community property. The son acquired a portion of his father’s interest in the farm.

The said S. L. Thornton now resides in Denton county with his present wife, who is . appellee Addie Thornton.

This is a suit for partition of' the Young county farm, filed in Denton county upon the contention that appellee Parker resides in that latter county and owns an interest in the land. R. S. art. 1995, subd. 13.

The only testimony on the trial was that of Parker. He says he was working at a sorghum mill for S. L. Thornton, who thereby became indebted to him “15 or 20 dollars,” and that Thornton agreed to deed him an acre interest in the farm; that thereafter Thornton became further indebted to him to a total of “about $50” “something less than fifty dollars,” and he insisted that Thornton secure a partition of the land. Thereupon he took said S. L. Thornton to his (Parker’s) lawyer, and on that occasion Thornton executed to him a deed of one acre interest in the farm and authorized the lawyer to file this suit. The deed was not recorded for want of revenue stamps, because, as Parker testified, he did not think thei deed worth 50 cents.

If we concede the prerogative of the trial court to believe Parker had an interest in the land itself, still it is to us quite plain that Parker is in fact a plaintiff in the suit and counsel for plaintiff in the suit is such because he is the lawyer for Parker. It is the facts of the transaction that decide the venue, not the name given them (Baldwin v. Baldwin (Tex. Civ. App.) 233 S. W. 130) or any artificial designation of the position in the suit of the par-ties thereto. All the actual defendants reside in Young county, and their privilege must be respected.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed, and the cause remanded to the. trial court, with instructions to transfer the same to the district court in Young county.
Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Disaboom, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Walpuck,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: 1.          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company. /s/ John
  WalpuckPrincipal
  Financial Officer Dated: August
14, 2008
#### BEARDEN v. STATE.

No. 18837.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1937.

Clifford Graves, of Paducah, and C. B. Whitten, of Matador, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for violating the liquor law; punishment, a fine of $100.

Appellant was convicted for transporting beer in Motley county, it being simply alleged in the first count of the information, “The transportation of such liquor in said county having been theretofore and was then prohibited in said county by the laws of said State.” The information is bad. See Whitmire v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 742. The information should have set out all of the facts accompanying and showing that in fact a local option election had been held in Motley county under an order of the commissioners court, and in accordance with law; showing the result; showing that the votes had been canvassed; that the order had been published, etc., as set out in Whitmire v. State, supra. There being no valid information, there could be no legal conviction.

The judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
AMENDMENT NO. 1

                  TO PORTLAND GENERAL CORPORATION

               MANAGEMENT DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN



 THIS AMENDMENT to the Portland General Corporation Management Deferred
 Compensation Plan (the "Plan") is made and entered into this 1st day of
 April, 1995, by the Senior Administrative Officer of Portland General
 Corporation, an Oregon Corporation;

 WHEREAS, the Company has established the Plan as restated October 1, 1994;
 and

 WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 10.1 of the Plan, the Senior Administrative
 Officer may amend the Plan from time to time as may be necessary for
 administrative purposes and legal compliance;

 NOW, THEREFORE, Section 2.13(e) of the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

 2.13  ELIGIBILE EMPLOYEE.

 (e)  The threshold amount effective April 1, 1995 and any subsequent year
 shall be eighty-five thousand dollars ($85,000).  Such amount may be
 adjusted by the Senior Administrative Officer each subsequent calendar
 year or at any other time as the Senior Administrative Officer deems
 necessary.

 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed
 as of the day and year first above written.

                              PORTLAND GENERAL CORPORATION


                              BY:      /S/ DONALD F. KIELBLOCK
                                         Donald F. Kielblock
                                     Senior Administrative Officer

<PAGE>
## SANITIZED

## SANITIZED

## SANITIZED

## SANITIZED

## SANITIZED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Homeland Security

###### Federal Emergency Management Agency

          - [Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4810-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2024-0001]

# AGENCY:

Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Vermont (FEMA-4810-DR), dated August 20, 2024, and related determinations.

# DATE:

 This amendment was issued August 22, 2024.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Webster, Office of Response and Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2833.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of a major disaster declaration for the State of Vermont is hereby amended to include the following area among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of August 20, 2024.

Orange County for Public Assistance.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance—Disaster Housing Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households—Other Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants—Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,

Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

[FR Doc. 2024-20484 Filed 9-10-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-23-P
Exhibit 21.1**Subsidiaries of Cardtronics, Inc.**   **Entity** **Jurisdiction of Organization**Cardtronics GP, Inc. Delaware   Cardtronics LP, Inc. Delaware   Cardtronics LP Delaware   Cardtronics Holdings, LLC Delaware   Cardtronics Limited United Kingdom   Bank Machine (Acquisitions) Limited United Kingdom   Bank Machine Limited United Kingdom   ATM National, LLC Delaware   ATM Ventures, LLC Oregon   Cardtronics Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Mexico City, Mexico
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Project No. 2444-042]
 On July 21, 2023, Northern States Power Company filed a relicense application for the 1.2-megawatt White River Hydroelectric Project No. 2444 (project). The project is located on the White River in Ashland and Bayfield Counties, New York. In accordance with the Commission's regulations, on June 14, 2024, Commission staff issued a notice that the project was ready for environmental analysis (REA Notice). Based on the information in the record, including comments filed on the REA Notice, staff does not anticipate that licensing the project would constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, staff intends to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) on the application to relicense the project.[1] The EA will be issued and circulated for review by all interested parties. All comments filed on the EA will be analyzed by staff and considered in the Commission's final licensing decision. The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or 
                    *OPP@ferc.gov*. The application will be processed according to the following schedule. The EA will be issued for a 30-day comment period. Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate. Milestone
Target dateCommission issues EA
May 30, 2025.
 Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Nicholas Ettema at (312) 596-4447 or 
                    *nicholas.ettema@ferc.gov*. Dated: September 23, 2024. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Acting Secretary.


# Footnotes

1.
    
                         In accordance with the Council on Environmental Quality's regulations, the unique identification number for documents relating to this environmental review is EAXX-019-20-000-1725362410. 40 CFR 1501.5(c)(4) (2024). Back to Citation


[FR Doc. 2024-22225 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3231 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect unpaid 

interns in the Federal Government from workplace harassment and discrimination, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3231 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Intern Protec3 tion Act of 2016’’. 

4 SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2302 of title 5, United 

6 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol7 lowing: 

8 ‘‘(g)(1) All protections afforded to an employee under 

9 subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D) of subsection (b)(1) shall 

10 be afforded, in the same manner and to the same extent, 

11 to an intern and an applicant for internship. 

12 ‘‘(2) For purposes of the application of this sub13 section, a reference to an employee shall be considered a 

14 reference to an intern in— 

15 ‘‘(A) section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 

16 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–16); 

17 ‘‘(B) sections 12 and 15 of the Age Discrimina18 tion in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 631, 

19 633a); and 

20 ‘‘(C) section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 

21 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791). 

22 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘intern’ means an 

23 individual who performs uncompensated voluntary service 

24 in an agency to earn credit awarded by an educational in25 stitution or to learn a trade or occupation.’’. 
3 

•HR 3231 EH

1 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3111(c)(1) 

2 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting 

3 ‘‘section 2302(g) (relating to prohibited personnel prac4 tices),’’ before ‘‘chapter 81’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 11, 

2016. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 
114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3231 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect 

for other purposes. workplace harassment and discrimination, and unpaid interns in the Federal Government from
# Official Journal L 215/2009

| | ISSN 1725-2555
  doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.215.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 215 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 5220 August 2009 |

ISSN 1725-2555

doi:10.3000/17252555.L_2009.215.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 215

English edition

Legislation

Volume 5220 August 2009

---

| Contents | | I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | | Commission Regulation (EC) No 758/2009 of 19 August 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables | 1 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 759/2009 of 19 August 2009 amending the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals (1) | 3 |
| | * | Commission Regulation (EC) No 760/2009 of 19 August 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1741/2006 laying down the conditions for granting the special export refund on boned meat of adult male bovine animals placed under the customs warehousing procedure prior to export | 5 |

Contents

I   Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory

page

REGULATIONS

Commission Regulation (EC) No 758/2009 of 19 August 2009 establishing the standard import values for determining the entry price of certain fruit and vegetables

1

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 759/2009 of 19 August 2009 amending the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 21/2004 establishing a system for the identification and registration of ovine and caprine animals (1)

3

*

Commission Regulation (EC) No 760/2009 of 19 August 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1741/2006 laying down the conditions for granting the special export refund on boned meat of adult male bovine animals placed under the customs warehousing procedure prior to export

5

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
 Date: August 12, 2008
    /s/ C. Gregory HarperC. Gregory HarperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC
General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP
General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
|    |                                                                                            |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 1. | I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Performant Financial Corporation; and |

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |
|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| 2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |

|                           |
|---------------------------|
|                           |  |  |  |  |  |  |
|                      |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Date: April 30, 2015 |   |   |   | By: |   | /s/ Hakan L. Orvell |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   | Hakan L. Orvell |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |
|                      |   |   |   |   |   | (Principal Financial Officer) |
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2828 

To amend titles 28 and 10, United States Code, to allow for certiorari 

review of certain cases denied relief or review by the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 18, 2015 

Mrs. DAVIS of California (for herself, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. BORDALLO, and 

Mr. GRIJALVA) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend titles 28 and 10, United States Code, to allow 

for certiorari review of certain cases denied relief or 

review by the United States Court of Appeals for the 

Armed Forces. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Equal Justice for Our 

5 Military Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2828 IH

1 SEC. 2. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF AP2 PEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1259 of title 28, United 

4 States Code, is amended— 

5 (1) in paragraph (3), by inserting ‘‘or denied’’ 

6 after ‘‘granted’’; and 

7 (2) in paragraph (4), by inserting ‘‘or denied’’ 

8 after ‘‘granted’’. 

9 (b) TECHNICAL AND CONFORMING AMENDMENTS.— 

10 (1) TITLE 10.—Section 867a(a) of title 10, 

11 United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘The 

12 Supreme Court may not review by a writ of certio13 rari under this section any action of the Court of 

14 Appeals for the Armed Forces in refusing to grant 

15 a petition for review.’’. 

16 (2) TIME FOR APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CER17 TIORARI.—Section 2101(g) of title 28, United States 

18 Code, is amended to read as follows: 

19 ‘‘(g) The time for application for a writ of certiorari 

20 to review a decision of the United States Court of Appeals 

21 for the Armed Forces, or the decision of a Court of Crimi22 nal Appeals that the United States Court of Appeals for 

23 the Armed Forces refuses to grant a petition to review, 

24 shall be as prescribed by rules of the Supreme Court.’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2828 IH

1 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subject to subsection (b), the 

3 amendments made by this Act shall take effect upon the 

4 expiration of the 180-day period beginning on the date of 

5 the enactment of this Act and shall apply to any petition 

6 granted or denied by the United States Court of Appeals 

7 for the Armed Forces on or after that effective date. 

8 (b) AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE RULES.—The au9 thority of the Supreme Court to prescribe rules to carry 

10 out section 2101(g) of title 28, United States Code, as 

11 amended by section 2(b)(2) of this Act, shall take effect 

12 on the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### JOHNSON v. STATE.

No. 15030.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 13, 1932.

Rehearing Denied March 2, 1932.

Ben C. Chapman and W. H. Murchison, Jr., both of Haskell, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin for the State.

HAWKINS, J. -

■ Conviction is for selling intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the peni-•bentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition no question is presented for review.

•The judgment is affirmed.

On Motion for Rehearing. '

BATTIMORE, J.

Appellant makes an appealing motion, asserting that she has now on file a statement of facts, which we are asked to consider. There appears in the record a statement of facts which was filed in the trial court on’ February 8, 1932. Appellant’s notice of appeal herein was given on November 4, 1931. Computation shows that the ninety days allowed by statute, after the giving of notice of appeal, in which a statement of facts may be filed, expired February 2, 1932. We regret that we cannot consider the statement of facts.

The motion for rehearing will be overruled.

MORROW, P. J., absent.
#### STANDARD INVESTMENT COMPANY, Appellant, v. R. T. NUTT, Appellee.

No. 3533.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Oct. 26, 1939.

Rehearing Denied Nov. 8, 1939.

H. B. Houston, of Dallas, and Sanders & McLeroy, of Center, for appellant.

E. B. Lewis and C. E. Avery, both of Center, for appellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This appeal was prosecuted from the judgment of the county court of Shelby county, overruling appellant’s plea of privilege to be sued in Dallas county.

The briefs show no error. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed without written opinion. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Futch, Tex.Civ.App., 127 S.W.2d 1040.