alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR  
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           1,609
<SECURITIES>                                     2,984
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                       470
<INVENTORY>                                      3,667
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,055
<PP&E>                                          24,900
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,325
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  68,161
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,653
<BONDS>                                         16,027
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,106
<COMMON>                                         3,518
<OTHER-SE>                                      28,355
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    68,161
<SALES>                                         74,277
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                74,277
<CGS>                                           59,430
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   71,831
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,381
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,274
<INCOME-TAX>                                       792
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,232
<DISCONTINUED>                                  21,322
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,554
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     5.80
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     5.46
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of SURFACE COATINGS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  May 16, 2011





/s/ Rick Pietrykowski





Name: Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  May 16, 2011





/s/ Rick Pietrykowski





Name: Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
#### HIGGINS v. STATE.

No. 20405.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1939.

No attorney for appellant.

Lloyd W.. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft of turkeys, punishment assessed being one year and six months in the penitentiary.

The indictment charges the offense. The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADDED BY

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hometown Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-QSB
for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition and results of the Company as of and for the period covered
by this Report.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Thomas F. GibneyThomas F. GibneyPresident and Chief Executive OfficerJune 27, 2007By:

/s/ Stephen W. DederickStephen W. DederickVice President and Chief Financial OfficerJune 27, 2007
<PAGE>   1

MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 21 - SUBSIDIARIES OF MAXCO, INC.





                           SUBSIDIARIES OF MAXCO, INC.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                                 State of
                                                                                               Incorporation
                                                                                               -------------
                  <S>                                                                          <C>
                  Atmosphere Annealing, Inc.                                                     Michigan

                  Ersco Corporation                                                              Michigan

                  Wisconsin Wire & Steel, Inc.                                                   Wisconsin
                  (subsidiary of Ersco Corporation)

                  Ersco of Michigan, Inc.                                                        Michigan

                  Pak-Sak Industries, Inc.                                                       Michigan

                  GUM, Inc. (formerly Ultra-Mag Industries, Inc.) (Inactive)                     Michigan

                  Parcco, Inc. (Inactive)                                                        Michigan

                  T.H.&P. Corporation (formerly Planet Corporation) (Inactive)                   Michigan
</TABLE>
# C_2020320EN.01000701.xml

| 28.9.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social n.o 1 de Barcelona (Spain) lodged on 11 June 2020 — HV v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

(Case C-258/20)

(2020/C 320/09)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social n.o 1 de Barcelona

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: HV

Defendant: Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS)

Question referred

Is Council Directive 79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of social security (1) to be interpreted as precluding a national provision, like that at issue in the main proceedings (Article 60(4) TRLGSS), which provides that women who have had at least two biological or adopted children and are recipients of contributory retirement pensions are entitled to a pension supplement, whereas other women who are in identical circumstances and who, as a result of the fact that they are women, are faced with identical difficulties as regards remaining in the employment market, are not entitled to such a retirement pension supplement because they have taken voluntary early retirement which, by law, is subject to greater contribution conditions than an ordinary pension and identical or very similar age conditions?

---

(1)  OJ 1979 L 6, p. 24.

---
# Official Journal C 212/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 212 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 644 June 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 212

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 644 June 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 212/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10220 — TPG Capital/AT&T/AT&T US video business) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 212/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10220 — TPG Capital/AT&T/AT&T US video business) (
  1
  )

1

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | Council |
| 2021/C 212/02 | Conclusions of the Council and of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on Sport Innovation | 2 |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 212/03 | Euro exchange rates — 3 June 2021 | 10 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

Council

2021/C 212/02

Conclusions of the Council and of the representatives of the governments of the Member States meeting within the Council on Sport Innovation

2

European Commission

2021/C 212/03

Euro exchange rates — 3 June 2021

10

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
formofparticipationagmtf







 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT  2017 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation   This Participation Agreement (this "Agreement") between _________________________ (print name) ("Director") and HNI Corporation (the "Corporation") is for the period commencing ________________ and ending December 31, ____, and is subject to all of the terms and conditions of the 2017 Equity Plan for Non-Employee Directors of HNI Corporation (the "Plan") and any successor plan.     I elect to receive ________% of my Director cash compensation paid in the form of HNI common stock in accordance with the terms of the Plan.   Dated ________________________, ______.                                    Director   Please complete this Agreement and return it to the Corporation's Vice President, Member Relations, before _____________, ____ should you wish to participate.     Received and accepted by HNI Corporation this          day of_____________, ____.   HNI Corporation   By:         Name:         Title:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Team Industrial Services, Inc. v. Kelli Most, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jesse Henson

Appellate case number: 01

- 22

- 00313

- CV

Trial court case number: 18

- DCV

- 256883

Trial court: 268th District Court of Fort Bend County

On May 25, 2022, the Fort Bend County District Clerk filed seven volumes of clerk’s

record and on e supplemental volume of clerk’s record that are sealed. The Court sent two letters to the parties, acknowledging receipt of the clerk’s record and the supplemental clerk’s record. The letter concerning the seven volumes of clerk’s record merely stated that the clerk’s record had

been filed and advise d of upcoming deadlines. The letter acknowledging receipt of the supplemental clerk’s record, referenced this volume as “the certified SEALED clerk’s record,” and

advised that the clerk’s office would not release sealed volumes without an order from the t rial court specifying who can have access to the record. The sealed volume contains three trial court orders sealing three responses to a no

- evidence motion for summary judgment.

On June 2, 2022, appellants filed an unopposed motion to unseal the suppleme ntal volume

of the clerk’s record . On June 7, 2022, w e abated the appeal and remand ed it to the trial court to hold a hearing to consider appellants’ request to unseal the supplemental volume of the clerk’s

record

. The trial court granted the unopposed motion to unseal the pleadings in the clerk’s record
on June 27, 2022.

We reinstate the appeal on the Court’s active docket. Pursuant to the trial court’s order, the supplemental volume of the clerk’s record is unsealed.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature:

___________ /s/ Julie Countiss

__________ Acting individually

Date: Ju ly 7, 2022
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3024 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit review of certain 

Medicare payment determinations for disproportionate share hospitals, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2015 

Mr. BOUSTANY (for himself and Mr. LEWIS) introduced the following bill; 

which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend title XVIII of the Social Security Act to permit 

review of certain Medicare payment determinations for 

disproportionate share hospitals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REVIEW OF MEDICARE PAYMENT DETERMINA4 TIONS FOR DISPROPORTIONATE SHARE HOS5 PITALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1886(r) of the Social Se7 curity Act (42 U.S.C. 1395ww(r)) is amended by striking 

8 paragraph (3). 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3024 IH

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

2 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any claim relat3 ing to a determination made under paragraph (2) of such 

4 section 1886(r) that is pending on a date that is on or 

5 after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Docket No. CP22-17-000]

                    On November 17, 2021, Rio Grande LNG, LLC filed an application pursuant to section 3 of the Natural Gas Act [1]                                          and Part 153 of the Commission's regulations [2]                                          to amend its authorization for the Rio Grande Liquified Natural Gas Terminal to incorporate a carbon capture and sequestration system. On August 20, 2024, Rio Grande LNG, LLC filed a notice of withdrawal of its application.                

                    No motion in opposition to the notice of withdrawal has been filed, and the Commission has taken no action to disallow the withdrawal. Pursuant to Rule 216(b) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure,[3]                                          the withdrawal of the application became effective on September 4, 2024, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.                

Dated: September 10, 2024.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Acting Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 717b.                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             18 CFR 153 (2023).                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                             18 CFR 385.216(b) (2023).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2024-21021 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3145 

To amend the Fair Housing Act to clarify congressional intent that the 

prohibitions of that Act do not extend to conduct that results in a 

disparate impact on a protected class unless the person engaging in 

that conduct intends that impact. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2015 

Mr. PERRY introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Fair Housing Act to clarify congressional 

intent that the prohibitions of that Act do not extend 

to conduct that results in a disparate impact on a protected class unless the person engaging in that conduct 

intends that impact. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Protect Local Inde5 pendence in Housing Act of 2015’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3145 IH

1 SEC. 2. ‘‘DISPARATE IMPACT’’ CASES UNDER THE FAIR 

2 HOUSING ACT. 

3 Section 804(f) of the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 

4 3604(f)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(10) Nothing in this title shall be construed to pro6 hibit conduct resulting in a disparate impact on a class 

7 protected by this title unless the person engaging in that 

8 conduct intended that impact.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
|   | (i) | the Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|--------|------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             | Hyperion Energy, Inc. |                                 |
|----------------------------------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------|
|                             |                  |                                 |   |
| Date:  August 12, 2009 | By:                   | /s/ Jeffrey J. Raymond          |   |
|                             |                  | Name:  Jeffrey J. Raymond  |   |
|                             |                  | Title:  President          |   |
|                             |                  |                                 |   |

| Date:  August 12, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Stephen DelVecchia                |   |
|----------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                             |   | Name:  Stephen DelVecchia        |   |
|                             |   | Title:  Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|                             |   |                                       |   |
#### McCANN v. STATE.

No. 16014.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 17, 1933.

Kirby, King & Overshiner, of Abilene, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Burglary is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for life.

The punishment for burglary is confinement in the penitentiary for a period of not less than two nor more than twelve years. The penalty assessed in the present instance is by virtue of article 63, P. C. 1925, author*452izing a lifetime penalty to one who has been three times convicted of a felony less, than capital. In the present instance, to meet the proof demanded, the state introduced certified copies" of judgments in which the name of the person convicted was Arthur McCann. There was á failure, however, to make other proof of the identity of the present appellant •as the person who committed the offenses on which the judgments mentioned were founded. That the mere recital in a certified copy of a judgment is not sufficient to prove the identity of the accused in the present case is established by many of the decisions of this court. See Goad v. State, 51 Tex. Cr. R. 393, 102 S. W. 121; Rogers v. State, 83 Tex. Cr. R. 526, 204 S. W. 222; Parker v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 53 S.W.(2d) 473; Bullard v. State, 40 Tex. Cr. R. 270, 50 S. W. 348.

For the reasons stated, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
OREGON METALLURGICAL CORPORATION


                                                      EXHIBIT 11.1

                                            Earnings per share computation


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     Three Years Ended
                                                     December 31, 1995                        
                                          (in thousands except per share data)

                                               1995       1994        1993
                                               ____       ____        ____

<S>                                         <C>         <C>        <C>
Net Income (loss)                           $ (2,415)   $ (2,023)   $ (4,098)
                                             ========    ========   ========

Weighted average shares outstanding            10,921      10,997     10,839
 
Weighted average share equivalents
assumed issued from Excess Benefit
Plan                                              121         ---        ---

Weighted average shares equivalents
assumed issued from  exercise of warrants          59           4        ---

Weighted average share equivalents
assumed issued as part of Employee
Compensation policy                               118         ---        ---
                                             ________    ________    ________

Weighted average share and share
equivalents outstanding                        11,219      11,001     10,839
                                             ========    ========   ========
Net income (loss) per share                  $  (0.22)   $  (0.18)  $  (0.38)
                                             ========    ========   ========
<PAGE>
Earnings per share computed on both the primary and fully diluted
bases are the same.

t:\wpwin60\95annual\exhibit.111
</TABLE>