alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION

SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF OUR CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER



I, Joseph Meuse, certify that:



1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Clopton House Corporation;



2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;



3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;



4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



/s/ Joseph Meuse

------------------------------

Joseph Meuse

President and Chief Executive Officer

August 1, 2008
p.1 

OAR Box 1837 

Prepped by Keeia Richards 

Document Number: 

181) IV-E-15 

Docket Number: 

A-84-33 

Printed 11/14/2008 3:48:12 PM Sheet 181 of 238 
P.2 

USB, 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 

A-?H-33 

\V-E-)5 

p

* WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

% PRO ^ 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

SUBJECT: Conversation with Joe Mullan, NCA, on Proposed NSR 

Surface Coal Mine Rulemaking — New Docket Entry: 

Docket Nb. A-84-33 

FRCM: Barbara Brown ££—^~ 

Office of Air and"Radiation 

TO: Central Docket Section (LE-131) 

- On November 5, 1987, Joe Mullan called for an update on the 

Agency's deliberations on the Surface Coal Mine Proposal rulemaking. 

I told him that we were still deliberating but hoped to have a 

decision scon. 

cc: Kirt Cox .^ 

Project Officer, OAQPS

 w'*^" 

JJ\N I 3 1989 

.=» t>' 

*"*,'•' ,'. S'' p '
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Flyersrights.org, Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection This document has attachments
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of Elko Ventures Inc. (the "Company")
for the period ended May 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Lou Schiliro, as Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: July 6, 2009                   By: /s/ Lou Schiliro
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Lou Schiliro
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shalL not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Order entered April 11, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-22-00053-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.W., K.W., AND C.B., CHILDREN

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-16-18501

No. 05-22-00054-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.H., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 301st Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DF-18-22246

ORDER

Before the Court is the Department’s April 8, 2022 first motion to extend 

time to file its briefs. We GRANT the motion and ORDER the briefs be filed no 

later than April 29, 2022.

/s/ DENNISE GARCIA

JUSTICE
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
<TABLE>
<S><C>

                                                                          Exhibit 10(n)




                                                                    February 25, 1998




Ms. Nancy A. Kindl
Portec, Inc.
One Hundred Field Drive, Suite 120
Lake Forest, Illinois  60045

Dear Nancy:

On July 17, 1997, I sent you a letter covering a success bonus arrangement which expires on March 31, 1998.  It now appears that  a
possible closing  on the last segment of Portec's business  would not occur prior to March 31, 1998.   Accordingly, as indicated in
Section 4 of the letter, I am hereby extending the expiration date of the success bonus from March 31, 1998, to July 31, 1998.

Please acknowledge receipt of this letter and  your agreement with the preceding terms at  the place provided on the enclosed  copy
and return such copy to me for Portec's files.

                                                                    Yours truly,



                                                                    M. T. Yonker
                                                                    President & CEO




Receipt and agreement acknowledged
on this       day of                 , 1998


</TABLE>
existing rules for commercial arbitration of the American Arbitration Association, or anysuccessor organization and with the expedited procedures thereof (collectively, the “Rules”). Eachof the parties hereto agrees that such arbitration shall be conducted by a single arbitratorselected in accordance with the Rules; provided that such arbitrator shall be experiencedin deciding cases concerning the matter which is the subject of the dispute. Any of the partiesmay demand arbitration by written notice to the other and to the arbitrator set forth in thisSection 6 (“Demand for Arbitration”). Each of the parties agrees that if possible, the award shallbe made in writing no more than thirty (30) days following the end of the proceeding. Any awardrendered by the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding and judgment may be entered on it in anycourt of competent jurisdiction. Each of the parties hereto agrees to treat as confidential theresults of any arbitration (including, without limitation, any findings of fact and/or law made bythe arbitrator) and not to disclose such results to any unauthorized person other than to enforceany award rendered. The parties intend that this agreement to arbitrate be valid, enforceable andirrevocable. In the event of any arbitration with regard to this Amendment, each party shall payits own legal fees and expenses, provided, however, that the parties agree to sharethe cost of the arbitrator’s fees.[SIGNATURE PAGE TO FOLLOW]
2

 
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment as of the date firstwritten above.      ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, INC.
|   | (1) | The      Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended      September 30, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)      or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Dated:      November 15, 2010 |   | /s/      Dejun Zou           |   |
|------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|--------|
|                               |   | Dejun      Zou               |   |
|                               |   | Chief      Executive Officer |   |
|                               |   |                         |   |
|                               |   | /s/      Ben Wang            |   |
|                               |   | Ben      Wang                |   |
|                               |   | Chief      Financial Officer |   |

----
#### COSTELLO v. STATE.

No. 14054.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 4, 1931.

Perkins & Perkins, of Rusk, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for transporting intoxicating liquor; punishment, one year in the penitentiary.

Appellant was suspected of being a peddler of whisky. The officers were watching him. He passed by on the street one day where certain officers were with other people, and one of the group said, “I bet he is going after whisky now.” The officers followed appellant, and saw him come' out of the house of one Murphy. They stopped him, searched him, and found on his person three pints of whisky. The officers affirmed upon the trial; that they had some other information regarding appellant, but they declined to divulge same.

We do not believe these officers justified in arresting this appellant without a warrant upon any hypothesis that he was' committing a felony within their view, or that they had probable cause for believing that he was transporting intoxicating liquor,. such as would justify their' searching him. without a warrant. The officers did not testify that they saw any outline of bottles un-. der appellant’s clothes or anything to suggest that he had on his person said intoxicating liquor, other than as above detailed. Appellant was walking along the streets with his hands in his pockets at the time he was. detained. There is no proof that appellant' had engaged to bring whisky to any person, or that he had sold any of same, or that he. had promised to sell same, or that the officers knew any more about the purpose of his journey along the street than as above indicated.

We are constrained to believe the arrest of appellant unwarranted, and that no right of search existed as an incident to a lawful arrest; also that the evidence as to what was found upon appellant’s person as = a result of the search by the officers was sub*173ject to the objection made by appellant when this testimony was offered against him upon the trial.

There is no evidence in this record save that of the two officers in question.

For the errors indicated, the judgment will Jae reversed, and the cause remanded.

HAWKINS, J., not sitting.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3117 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3117

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for reimbursement 
    from health flexible spending arrangements for feminine hygiene 
                               products.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 20, 2015

   Ms. Meng introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide for reimbursement 
    from health flexible spending arrangements for feminine hygiene 
                               products.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Fund Essential Menstruation Products 
Act of 2015'' or the ``FEM Products Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. REIMBURSEMENT FROM HEALTH FLEXIBLE SPENDING ARRANGEMENTS FOR 
              FEMININE HYGIENE PRODUCTS.

    (a) In General.--Section 106 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(g) Feminine Hygiene Products.--
            ``(1) In general.--Amounts paid or incurred for feminine 
        hygiene products shall be treated as a qualified medical 
        expense eligible for reimbursement from a health flexible 
        spending arrangement.
            ``(2) Feminine hygiene products defined.--For purposes of 
        paragraph (1), the term `feminine hygiene products' means 
        tampons, pads, liners, cups, sponges, douches, wipes, sprays, 
        and similar products used by women with respect to menstruation 
        or other genital-tract secretions.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to taxable years beginning after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 0**  **9**
**- 8**  **191**

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appell ee ,

v.

IVAN MAGDALENO , Defendant

– Appell ant

.

**No. 10**  **- 6254** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.

IVAN MAGDALENO , Defendant

- Appellant.

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Spartanburg

. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 7 : 06

- c r
- 00 7 0 3

- GRA

- 2 )

Submitted : M arch 30 , 2010 De cided: April 5 , 2010

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and SHEDD , Circuit Judges.2 Affirme d by un published per curiam opinion

.

Ivan Magdaleno , Appellant Pro Se

. Jimmie Ewing , Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia , South Carolina , for Appellee.

Un published opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:
Ivan Magdaleno appeals the district court ’s orders denying his motion for specific performance of his plea agreement pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) , his motion for reconsideration of that denial , and his motion to
reopen the case

. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Magdaleno , No. 7:06

- cr
00703

- GRA

- 2 (D .S.C. Nov. 9, 2009; Nov. 25, 2009 ; Jan. 26, 2010 )

. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
[No. 19211-3-III.

Division Three.

December 21, 2000.]

#### Harley C. Douglass, Inc., *Appellant,*v. Country Homes Properties, # 2, L.L.C., et al., *Respondents.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane County, No. 97-2-06521-1, Michael E. Donohue, J., entered August 2, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Sweeney and Schultheis, JJ.
Exhibit 31.1  CERTIFICATION OF THE PRESIDENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT  I, Peter Destler, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of GD Conference Center, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2007;  2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this quarterly report;  4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:  a. designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;  b. evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and  c. presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;  5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a. all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and  b. any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and   6. I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this certification as of the 13th day of November, 2007.



/s/ Peter Destler

Peter Destler

President (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
rr, ,.., . ' 

:MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 

between the 

THE ARKANSAS FORESTRY COMMISSION 

and the 

THE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONl'viENTAL QUALI1Y 

REGARDING LOGGING COMPLAINT INVESTIGATIONS. 

WHEREAS the Arkansas Department ofEnvironmentil! Quality (ADEQ) and the Arkansas 

Forestry Commission (AFC) have complimentary responsibilities arid expertise in the control of 

nonpoint source pollution from silviculturil! activities; 

and 

WHEREAS the AFC, under agreement with the United States Environmental Protection Agency, 

is the lead agency in Arkansas for the prevention and management ofnonpoint source pollution 

from silviculturil! activities; 

and 

WHEREAS the ADEQ, under the authority of the federil! Clean Water Act and the Arkansas 

Water and Air Pollution Control Act, has the charge of enforcing the water pollution control laws 

and regulations in Arkansas; 

and 

WHEREAS the objective of this MemorandUn1 is to better protect forest water quality by 

promptly and efficiently responding to complaints regarding silviculturil! operations; 

NOW LET IT THEREFORE BE RESOLVED: 

That ADEQ and AFC enter into this Memorandum of Understanding concerning the handling of 

complaints about possible impacts to water quality from silviculturil! activities, particularly 

logging. 

In fulfillrnent of this goil!: 

ADEQWILL: 

Promptly notify AFC of ill! complaints about water quality impacts from silviculturil! 

activities unless it can be determined that the complaint involves a timber harvest which is 

part of the land clearing phase ofa construction project which would require a NPDES 

Stormwater Permit. ADEQ may, at its discretion, investigate any complaint in order to 
fulfill its enforcement commitments to the Environmental Protection Agency and/or to 

carry out its responsibilities under the Arkansas Water and Air pollution Control Act. All 

other complaints will be referred to AFC for initial investigation. 

Jointly work complaints with AFC at the request of AFC. 

Use its compliance and enforcement authority to bring silvicultural activities into 

compliance with federal and state water pollution laws and to initiate formal enforcement 

actions when appropriate if, after investigation, ADEQ determines that silvicultural 

activities have violated federal or state water pollution laws. 

AFC WILL: 

Promptly investigate complaints by having the AFC Best Management Practice Forester 

visit the site and assess the silvicultural activity. , . ~& 

fo~vth<l I t,., .,.:li'>-\.1.., ~"-A.\,\,."\ '"'if If the BMP Forester believes a sel'iews JlBilatiea problem exists or if the responsible party 

refuses to cooperate with the AFC to correct lesser problems, the BMP Forester will 

contact ADEQ to arrange a joint inspection. 

Jointly work complaints with ADEQ at the request of ADEQ. 

It is understood by both parties that this agreement will in no way prevent AFC or ADEQ from 

fulfilling the duties assigned by the legislation governing the respective agencies. 

AFC or ADEQ may rescind this Memorandum by letter from one director to the other. 

InterimD 

Arkansas 

• 

/-19- Z.O~l 

Date 

--z.5-DI 

bate