alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### GLAZIER v. ROBERTS et al.

No. 13564.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Fort Worth.

Feb. 11, 1938.

Slay & Simon, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

McGown *&*McGown, John M. Scott Jr., and B. E. Godfrey, all of Fort Worth, for appellee W. E. Roberts.

Marvin B. Simpson and Harris Brewster, both of Fort Worth, for appellee Mrs Corinne Fickas.

PER CURIAM.

This is a motion for rehearing by appellant, Joseph Glazier, on judgments entered by this court on motions by both appellees to have the mandate in this cause issued without payment of costs.

On January 14, 1938, we granted the respective motions of appellees in this case and directed the issuance of mandate without payment of costs; on the same day we overruled appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, to bring before this court, as a part of the record, a cost bond filed in the trial court; we also on the same day overruled appellant’s motion to tax the cost of appeal in this case against certain persons alleged to be sureties on a bond filed in the trial court.

The motions to issue mandate were contested by appellant, by affidavits and extracts from testimony taken upon the trial, along with certified copies of documentary evidence; but, as shown, we sustained the motions to issue mandate.

The motion for certiorari was to bring into the record on the appeal a certain bond *274filed in the trial court by the appellee, Roberts, with a view to have the costs of appeal taxed against the sureties on the said bond. Our several orders referred to were made without comment.

In the motion before us, we are asked that in the event we overrule the request for a rehearing, that we indicate whether, by our former orders, we meant to hold that the property, described in the contest of the motion of appellee, Mrs. Corinne Fickas, was exempt and not subject to execution, and whether we determined by our order that the sureties on the bond filed by appellee, Roberts, in the trial court, were not liable for the costs incurred on appeal. We think appellant is entitled to have our orders thus clarified, since he indicates that he may desire in the future to take further action in regard to one or both said matters.

Our orders did not in any way adjudicate the two questions involved. If the orders entered are insufficient to make this plain, then they are here modified and amended so as to definitely settle those questions in that way; that is, that each and all said orders were made and entered without prejudice in any way to any right or remedy appellant may have with reference to any property owned or claimed by appellee, Mrs. Corrine Fickas, or as against the sureties on the bond referred to; and said orders shall not be construed to interfere with any such rights as'appellant may be entitled to enforce against either of said parties.

With the above explanation and modification of. said orders of this court, the motion fot rehearing is overruled.
POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The undersigned director(s) of Portland General Corporation hereby
 appoint(s) Alvin Alexanderson, Joseph M. Hirko and Joseph E. Feltz, and
 each of them generally, as the attorney-in-fact, in any and all capacities
 stated herein, to execute on behalf of the undersigned and to file with
 the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act
 of 1934, as amended, the Portland General Corporation Annual Report on
 Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.


 Dated:  FEBRUARY 6, 1996
         Portland, Oregon


    /S/ GWYNETH GAMBLE BOOTH
Gwyneth Gamble Booth                       Jerry E. Hudson


    /S/ PETER J. BRIX
Peter J. Brix                              Warren E. McCain


    /S/ CAROLYN S. CHAMBERS                      /S/ JEROME J. MEYER
Carolyn S. Chambers                        Jerome J. Meyer


    /S/ JOHN W. CREIGHTON, JR.                   /S/ RANDOLPH L. MILLER
John W. Creighton, Jr.                     Randolph L. Miller

    
    /S/ KEN L. HARRISON                          /S/ BRUCE G. WILLISON
Ken L. Harrison                            Bruce G. Willison



<PAGE>

                         POWER OF ATTORNEY


     The undersigned director(s) of Portland General Electric Company
 hereby appoint(s) Alvin Alexanderson, Joseph M. Hirko and Joseph E. Feltz,
 and each of them generally, as the attorney-in-fact, in any and all
 capacities stated herein, to execute on behalf of the undersigned and to
 file with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities
 Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Portland General Electric Company
 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995.


 Dated:  FEBRUARY 6, 1996
         Portland, Oregon


    /S/ GWYNETH GAMBLE BOOTH
Gwyneth Gamble Booth                       Jerry E. Hudson


    /S/ PETER J. BRIX
Peter J. Brix                              Warren E. McCain


    /S/ CAROLYN S. CHAMBERS                      /S/ JEROME J. MEYER
Carolyn S. Chambers                        Jerome J. Meyer


    /S/ JOHN W. CREIGHTON, JR.                   /S/ RANDOLPH L. MILLER
John W. Creighton, Jr.                     Randolph L. Miller


    /S/ KEN L. HARRISON                          /S/ BRUCE G. WILLISON
Ken L. Harrison                            Bruce G. Willison


<PAGE>
# Official Journal C 358/2021

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 358 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 647 September 2021 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 358

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 647 September 2021

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions |
| | RECOMMENDATIONS |
| | European Systemic Risk Board |
| 2021/C 358/01 | Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 26 July 2021 amending Recommendation ESRB/2015/2 on the assessment of cross-border effects of and voluntary reciprocity for macroprudential policy measures (ESRB/2021/6) | 1 |

Contents

page

I   Resolutions, recommendations and opinions

RECOMMENDATIONS

European Systemic Risk Board

2021/C 358/01

Recommendation of the European Systemic Risk Board of 26 July 2021 amending Recommendation ESRB/2015/2 on the assessment of cross-border effects of and voluntary reciprocity for macroprudential policy measures (ESRB/2021/6)

1

---

| | II   Information |
| --- | --- |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 358/02 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10403 — SHV/ACTA) (
  1
  ) | 13 |

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 358/02

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case M.10403 — SHV/ACTA) (
  1
  )

1

13

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 358/03 | Euro exchange rates — 6 September 2021 | 14 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2021/C 358/03

Euro exchange rates — 6 September 2021

14

---

| | V   Announcements |
| --- | --- |
| | PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY |
| | European Commission |
| 2021/C 358/04 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10334 — BMW/Daimler/BP/Digital Charging Solutions) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 15 |
| 2021/C 358/05 | Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10417 — D’Ieteren/Wehold/TVH Parts) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  ) | 17 |

V   Announcements

PROCEDURES RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPETITION POLICY

European Commission

2021/C 358/04

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10334 — BMW/Daimler/BP/Digital Charging Solutions) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

15

2021/C 358/05

Prior notification of a concentration (Case M.10417 — D’Ieteren/Wehold/TVH Parts) – Candidate case for simplified procedure (
  1
  )

1

17

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Page 45 of 46

# EXHIBIT 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I the undersigned Chief
Executive Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31,
2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the SEC or its Staff upon request.

|Date: March 10, 2006 | /S/ M.J. Cohen                     
|-------------------- | -----------------------------------
|                     | M. J. Cohen
Chief Executive Officer

---
/s



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

January 14, 2 015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00715

- CV

TK HANKS LP and Paloma Capital LLC, Appellant s

v.

ENERFIN FIELD SERVICES LLC

, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11

- 07

- 00120

- CVL Honorable Stella Saxon, Judge Presiding



### O RDER

On January 9, 2015, the appellee filed an unopposed motion to abate this appeal stating

that the parties have reached an agreement settling this matter but they need time to prepare the documents related to their agreement. The motion further states that the parties anticipate filing documents in this court seeking final disposition of this appeal. The motion is GRANTED, and this appeal is ABATED. All appellate deadlines are s uspend ed until further order of th is c ourt.

_________________________________ Karen Angelini, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 14 th day of January, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of THE POTOMAC EDISON
COMPANY (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                  |  |  |  |                                            
|----------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------------
|                  |  |  |  | /s/    PAUL J.
EVANSON                     
|February 28, 2006 |  |  |  | Paul J. Evanson Principal Executive Officer
# Official Journal L 180/2015

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 180 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 588 July 2015 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 180

English edition

Legislation

Volume 588 July 2015

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2015/1098 of 19 June 2015 establishing that no effective action has been taken by the United Kingdom in response to the Council Recommendation of 2 December 2009 | 1 |
| | * | Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1099 of 7 July 2015 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran | 4 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2015/1098 of 19 June 2015 establishing that no effective action has been taken by the United Kingdom in response to the Council Recommendation of 2 December 2009

1

*

Council Decision (CFSP) 2015/1099 of 7 July 2015 amending Decision 2010/413/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Iran

4

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3131 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3131

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, when issuing a 
  research paper, to include all studies, data, and other analyses on 
                       which the paper was based.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 21, 2015

 Mr. Fitzpatrick introduced the following bill; which was referred to 
                  the Committee on Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, when issuing a 
  research paper, to include all studies, data, and other analyses on 
                       which the paper was based.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Bureau Research Transparency Act''.

SEC. 2. RESEARCH PAPER TRANSPARENCY.

    Section 1013 of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 (12 
U.S.C. 5493) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(h) Research Paper Transparency.--Any time the Bureau, either 
through the research unit established by the Director under subsection 
(b)(1) or otherwise, issues a research paper that is available to the 
public, the Bureau shall accompany such paper with all studies, data, 
and other analyses on which the paper was based.''.
                                 <all>
```
# Official Journal C 179A/16 J

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 179A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5116 July 2008 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 179A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5116 July 2008

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) |
| 2008/C 179A/01 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/98/07 — Senior audit officers (AD 9) of Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Romanian, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship | 1 |
| 2008/C 179A/02 | Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/86/07 — Conference interpreters (AD 5) having Czech (CS) as main language | 3 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO)

2008/C 179A/01

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/98/07 — Senior audit officers (AD 9) of Bulgarian, Czech, Estonian, Lithuanian, Maltese, Romanian, Slovenian and Slovakian citizenship

1

2008/C 179A/02

Reserve list — Open competition EPSO/AD/86/07 — Conference interpreters (AD 5) having Czech (CS) as main language

3

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Page 1

Anthony J. Pucciarella

ALARIS

PO Box 1835

Lusby, MD 20657

240.538.8444

Tony@TeamAlaris.com

9 October 2015

United States Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Amendment to Petition for Exemption Request dated July 11, 2015, Alaris

Dear Sir or Madam:

On 11 July 2015, Alaris petitioned the FAA for an exemption to allow commercial operations of 

the Phantom 3 and Inspire UAS under Section 333 of the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 

2012 (see Docket FAA-2015-4165-001). Alaris now respectfully requests that the following 

systems be added to the original exemption request to allow Alaris to operate these models 

under the same conditions as stated in the original request:

• UAV Solutions Phoenix series UAS (Phoenix 15, Phoenix 30, Phoenix 60 and Phoenix 60LE) 

• 3D Robotics Solo and IRIS+

• DJI S1000 UAS

A copy of the Operations and Maintenance Manuals will be provided for each system.

 

The Phoenix series UAS all weigh less than 55 pounds and use the same autopilot, control 

systems, mission planning software and procedures (Normal, Emergency, and Maintenance 

procedures). The Phoenix 30 has been approved under Exemption 12109, Docket FAA-2015-

1122. The Phoenix 60 has been approved under Exemption 12110, Docket FAA-2015-1120. 

The Phoenix 60LE is a “long endurance” version of the Phoenix 60. 

The 3D Robotics Solo and IRIS+ both weigh less than 55 pounds and have been approved under

previous exemptions. See the following previously approved exemptions for these systems:

• 3D Robotics Solo (Exemption No. 12146 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–1615)

• 3D Robotics IRIS+ (Exemption No. 12084 Regulatory Docket No. FAA–2015–0385)
Page 2

The DJI S1000 weighs less than 55 pounds and has been approved under previous exemptions 

including Exemption No. 11184 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2014-0803).

The newly requested systems are very similar in size and performance to the systems originally 

requested and do not affect the basis of the original request. Alaris refers the FAA to its original 

exemption request submitted in Docket FAA-2015-4165 for a listing of regulations for which a 

waiver is being sought; a demonstration of the public interest; and a showing of an equivalent 

level of safety. 

Please contact me at your earliest convenience if there are any questions. 

Sincerely,

Anthony J. Pucciarella

ALARIS
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

Richard H. Bernstein, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 June 3, 2015

s0527

Order 

Clerk

June 3, 2015

149918

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 149918

COA: 312319

Oakland CC: 2012-241303-FH

THANH MANH NGUYEN,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 24, 2014 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERIC FLORES,

Appellant,

v.

VICTOR PARRA AND

JOE SPENCER,

Appellees. §

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 14

- 00078

- CV

Appeal from

383rd District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2014DCM0606)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes the appeal should be

dismissed for want of jurisdiction, in accordance with the opinion of this Court. We therefore

dismiss the appeal. We further order that because Appellant is indigent, no order regarding costs

is made. We further order that this decision be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30 TH DAY OF MA Y , 2014.

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Rodriguez, JJ.
AMENDMENT
No. 5


 


TO
LOAN AGREEMENT


 


This
Amendment to Loan Agreement DRICBDH0615 (the “Amendment”) is made and entered into as of June 26, 2017, by
and between Biodyne Holding SA, a Swiss corporation (the “Lender”) and Hancock Jaffe Laboratories, Inc., a
Delaware corporation, (the “Borrower”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS,
the Lender and the Borrower are party to a Loan Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2015 (the “Loan Agreement”) and Convertible
Promissory Notes with the right of transfer as determined by the Lender in accordance with Section 4 of the Loan Agreement.


 


WHEREAS,
the Lender and the Borrower desire to amend the Loan Agreement to provide for an extension of funding and repayment periods.


 


NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows:


 


Section
1.1 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


Section
1.1.: This Agreement sets out the terms and conditions upon which the Lender will make available to the Borrower a loan of up
to USD 2,200,000 (two million two hundred thousand US Dollars) in several installments through January 31, 2018.


 


Section
5 of the loan agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:


 


Section
5: REPAYMENT


 


	 	5.1.	The
    Loan shall bear interest at the rate of three per cent (3%) per annum. The interest shall be calculated from the date the
    Lender remits funds to Borrower
	 	5.2.	Interest
    shall be due and payable by the Borrower to the Lender on an annual basis, the first payment to occur on January 31, 2018.
	 	5.3.	The
    Borrower undertakes to repay to the Lender the Loan plus any unpaid interest accruing thereon by January 31, 2018. The Borrower
    is entitled to repay the loan and the accrued interests at any time before January 31, 2018 without penalty.


 




    	 	 	 1



    	 		 



    

 


IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Loan Agreement as of the date first written above.


 


	 	“LENDER”
	 	 	 
	 	Biodyne
    Holding SA
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/S/
    YURY ZHIVILO
	 	Yury
    Zhivilo, Managing Director
	 	 	 
	 	“BORROWER”
	 	 	 
	 	HANCOCK
    JAFFE LABORATORIES, INC.
	 	 	 
	 	By:	/S/
    WILLIAM ABBOTT
	 	William
    Abbott, Chief Financial Officer


 




    	 	 	 2
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA F OURTH D ISTRICT

LEQUAN ANTONIO DAVID , Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA , Appellee.

No. 4D 17

- 1831

[ August 23, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Laura Sellers Johnson, Judge; L.T. Case No. 50

- 2016

- CF

000625

- AXXX

- MB.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Claire V. Madill, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anesha Worthy,
A ssistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee

.
Affirmed

.

G ERBER , C.J., and G ROSS , J., concur. C ONNER , J
., dissents without opinion.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.