alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023284EN.01001801.xml

| 11.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 284/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 284/18

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.108596

(2023/C 284/17)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 27.7.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.108596 |
| Member State | Poland |
| Region | |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Dopłata do nawozów mineralnych (poprawka SA.107307 (2023/N)) |
| Legal basis | Par. 13zx of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended) |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 31.12.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa |
| ul. Poleczki 33,02-822 Warszawa |

Date of adoption of the decision

27.7.2023

Aid number

SA.108596

Member State

Poland

Region

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Dopłata do nawozów mineralnych (poprawka SA.107307 (2023/N))

Legal basis

Par. 13zx of the Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 27 January 2015 on the detailed scope and manner of implementation of certain tasks of the Agency for Restructuring and Modernization of Agriculture (J.O., item 187, as amended)

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Intensity

Duration

Until 31.12.2023

Economic sectors

Crop and animal production, hunting and related service activities

Name and address of the granting authority

Agencja Restrukturyzacji i Modernizacji Rolnictwa

ul. Poleczki 33,02-822 Warszawa

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search?caseInstrument=SA

---
Exhibit
32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 I, Steven D. Eversole, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kentucky
USA Energy, Inc., for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 2010 fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and that the information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
operations of Kentucky USA Energy, Inc..
 
 Date:  June
      21, 2010
                    By:
                    /s/
      Steven D. EversoleSteven
      D. EversoleChief
      Executive Officer
 
 A signed
original of this written statement, or other document authenticating,
acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement, has been provided to
Kentucky USA Energy, Inc., and will be retained by Kentucky USA Energy, Inc.,
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|   | 1. | The Company’s Form 10-Q for the      fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”), fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | Information contained in the      Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition      and results of operations of theCompany. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                       | /s/      Xiaoqun Ye                |
|----------------------------|------------------------------------|
| Date:      August 19, 2010 | Xiaoqun      Ye                    |
|                       | Chief      Executive Officer       |
|                       | (Principal      Executive Officer) |
|                       |                               |
|                       | /s/      Yan Lin                   |
| Date:      August 19, 2010 | Yan      Lin                       |
|                       | Chief      Accounting Officer      |
|                       | (Principal      FinancialOfficer)  |

----
Exhibit 31.1**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**     I, Albert F. Richmond, certify that:1. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, resultsof operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisannual report;3. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and15d-14) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is beingprepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”);and c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function): a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which couldadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialdata and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internalcontrols; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whetheror not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that couldsignificantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses.     Date: April 15, 2007 /s/ Albert F. Richmond Albert F. Richmond        Chief Executive Officer
#### DE BELL et al. v. SCHUETZ.

No. 9388.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 22, 1933.

Rehearing Denied Dec. 13, 1933.

*414Boyle, Wheeler, Gresham & Terrell, of San Antonio, for appellants.

Maurice Lehmann, of Boerne, and Alfred Petsch, of Fredericksburg, for appellee.

MURRAY, Justice.

Henry Schuetz, appellee, brought this suit .against A. W. De Bell, his wife, Elsie 0. De Bell, and Boerne State Bank, seeking a mandatory injunction compelling the officers of this bank to deliver to him one certain deed held by them subject to an escrow agreement between himself and the two De Bells.

A. W. De Bell and wife were in possession of a certain tract of land in Kendall county, which constituted their homestead. There was an outstanding vendor’s lien note against the property with something over $8,000 in principal due. Suit to foreclose had been instituted by. appellee, and, in order to avoid a foreclosure, De Bell and wife executed an escrow agreement, together with a deed to the property, and deposited same with the Boerne Bank, to be delivered to appellee in the event they did not pay certain sums of money on or before October 7, 1933.

After the execution of this deed, Mrs. Elsie O. De Bell notified the officers of the bank not to deliver this deed, as she wished to retract her agreement to convey her homestead.

This suit was instituted to compel the delivery of the deed and to secure possession of the premises.

The trial judge held a hearing in Kerr county on October 13,1933, and granted a mandatory injunction, as prayed for.

We are of the opinion this was error. Mrs. De Bell had executed a deed to her homestead, hut it had not been fully delivered ; it was placed in escrow to be returned to her in the event she and her husband were able to pay approximately $2,000 prior to October 7, 1933. In the event the payment was not made, the deed was to be delivered to Schuetz. Before the date oil which the deed was to be delivered, Mrs. De Bell notified the officers of the bank of her desire to retract her agreement to convey her homestead.

A married woman can only convey her homestead by a written deed duly signed, acknowledged by her as required by law, and delivered. At any time before complete delivery, she may retract and refuse to convey. A conditional delivery or a delivery in escrow is insufficient to pass title to a married woman’s homestead. And especially is this true where the deed is to be returned to her on the happening of certain contingencies. This would constitute nothing more than an exec-utory contract for the sale of the homestead which may be revoked. Jones v. Goff, 63 Tex. 248; Crabb v. Bell (Tex. Civ. App.) 220 S. W. 623; Jackson v. Scoggins (Tex. Civ. App.) 220 S. W. 302; Maynard v. Gilliam (Tex. Civ. App.) 225 S. W. 818; Blue v. Conner (Tex. Civ. App.) 219 S. W. 533.

The order granting the temporary mandatory injunction will be reversed and set'aside.
<PAGE>

MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 32.1 - CERTIFICATION

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K of Maxco, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Max A. Coon, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date: July 14, 2005

                                       /s/ Max A. Coon
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Max A. Coon
                                       Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
#### Bennie WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 18046.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1936.

Robert W. Dean, of Navasota, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular and regularly presented. The record is before this court without statement of facts and bills of exception.

No error having been perceived or pointed out, the judgment is affirmed.
NUMBER 13-24-00360-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

TRAVIS SCOTT KIPFER, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

ON APPEAL FROM THE 36TH DISTRICT COURT

OF SAN PATRICIO COUNTY, TEXAS

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justice Benavides, Longoria, and Silva

Memorandum Opinion by Justice Benavides

Appellant Travis Scott Kipfer filed a notice of appeal attempting to appeal a

judgment of conviction in trial court cause number S-23-3231CR. The trial court’s 

certification of the defendant’s right to appeal shows that the case was a plea-bargain 

case, and appellant has no right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). 
2

On July 18, 2024, we ordered appellant’s counsel to review the record and 

determine whether appellant has the right to appeal. On July 31, 2024, appellant’s 

counsel filed a response indicating the judgment was entered after a plea-bargain; she 

further concluded that the appellant does not otherwise have the right to appeal. 

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed 

if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. 

Id. R. 25.2(d); see id. R. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed. 

GINA M. BENAVIDES

Justice

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed on the

29th day of August, 2024.
#### HYDE v. STATE.

No. 15885.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 22, 1933.

R. Dee Davis, of Orange, for appellant.

Dloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

The offense is possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Notwithstanding the record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exception, appellant insists that certain errors were committed by the trial court which should work a reversal of the judgment. It is urged that the motion for a new trial, which was controverted by the state, manifests an erroneous ruling by the trial judge in admitting testimony touching the result of a search for intoxicating liquor; and, further, that the record reveals that the indictment was returned upon illegal testimony.

We have no way of determining whether the search was illegal. Appellant’s motion for a new trial constitutes a mere pleading. In all eases, to invoke a review of the action of the trial court'upon the receipt or rejection of evidence, a bill of exception is imperative. This is statutory. Fisher v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 332, 1 S.W.(2d) 301. *534The objection to the evidence may be waived, and is waived, unless proper objection is made or timely motion to exclude is presented, and proper bill of exception preserved exhibiting the ruling and the complaint thereof. Eisher v. State, supra.

Touching the attach on the indictment, we quote from Branch’s Annotated Penal Code, § 484, as follows: “The courts will not go behind the action of the grand jury to inquire as to what evidence they had or did not have before them when considering whether or not they would present an indictment.”

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
---

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Charles Thompson Slay, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Forza Environmental
      Building Products, Inc. for the period ended February 28, 2011 (the
      "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Forza Environmental Building Products,
  Inc..                                                                 

Dated: April 19, 2011

| | /s/
      Charles Thompson Slay                        
| | -------------------------------------------------------
| | Charles Thompson Slay                                  
| | President, Chief Operating Officer, Secretary
      and
| | Director                                               
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)              
| | Forza Environmental Building Products, Inc.            

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Forza
Environmental Building Products, Inc. and will be retained by Forza
Environmental Building Products, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (date of earliest event reported): December 6, 2006
 PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    1-13289
(Commission File Number)
    
    76-0069030
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 5847 San Felipe, Suite 3300Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77057
(Zip Code)
 713) 789-1400
 see
 o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
 o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))
 o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.SIGNATURE    Table of Contents  
 Item 5.02
    
    Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
    2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.By:
    /s/ W. Gregory LooserW. Gregory LooserSenior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary  3
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2011-0382

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM063AD

767-23-0159, R1 --- 12/5/02

767-23-0159 --- 7/25/02

767-31-0091 IN 01--- 5/23/07

767-31-0091, R3 --- 4/27/00

767-31-0091, R2 --- 2/24/00

767-31-0091, R1 --- 2/4/99

767-31-0091 --- 7/23/98

767-31-0098, R1 --- 2/4/99

767-31-0098 --- 8/27/98

767-31-0099, R2 --- 6/17/99

767-31-0099, R1 --- 2/4/99

767-31-0099 --- 8/6/98

767-31-0100, R1 --- 2/4/99

767-31-0100 --- 8/20/98

767-31-0114 --- 3/18/99

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
EXHIBIT 31.1



CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION



I, P. Morgan McCune, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Triple A Medical, Inc.



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;



b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.





Date: November 8, 2007















/s/ P. Morgan McCune







P. Morgan McCune









President and Chief Executive Officer