Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Notices 79307 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claims 

1–15, 19–21, and 23–26 of the ’511 

patent; the claim of the D’205 patent; 

and the claim of the D’208 patent, and 

whether an industry in the United 

States exists as required by subsection 

(a)(2) of section 337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘exercise equipment 

known as Pilates reformers’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Balanced 

Body, Inc., 5909 88th St., Sacramento, 

CA 95828. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

Guangzhou Oasis, LLC, d/b/a 

trysauna.com, 1942 Broadway St., 

Suite 314C, Boulder, CO 80302 

Ciga Pilates, 22/F, Star House, 3 

Salisbury Road, Tism Sha Tsui, KL, 

Hong Kong 

Shandong Tmax Machinery Technology 

Co. Ltd., 2nd Floor, No. 21, Building 

1, Qixi Market, Xinhua Sub-district, 

Dezhou City, Shandong Province, 

China 253024 

Shandong VOG Sports Products Co. 

Ltd., South, 50 meters east of the 

intersection of Zhenhua Street and 

Commercial Street, Ningjin County, 

Dezhou City, Shandong Province, 

China 253400 

Dezhou Bodi Fitness Equipment Co., 

Ltd., No. 17 Taishan Road, Small and 

Medium-sized Enterprise Park, 

Ningjin County Development Zone, 

Dezhou City, Shandong Province, 

China 

Suzhou Selfcipline Sports Goods Co., 

Ltd., Unit 384, Room 1601, Building 

1, Yueliangwan, International 

Business Center, No. 9 Cuiwei Street, 

Suzhou Industrial Park, China 

(Jiangsu), Pilot Free Trade Zone, 

Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 23, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–22149 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

INTERNATIONAL TRADE 

COMMISSION 

[Investigation No. 337–TA–1420] 

Certain Smart Televisions; Notice of 

Institution of Investigation 

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice. 

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a 

complaint was filed with the U.S. 

International Trade Commission on 

August 22, 2024, under section 337 of 

the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on 

behalf of Maxell, Ltd. of Japan. A letter 

supplementing the complaint was filed 

on September 10, 2024. The complaint, 

as supplemented, alleges violations of 

section 337 based upon the importation 

into the United States, the sale for 

importation, and the sale within the 

United States after importation of 

certain smart televisions by reason of 

the infringement of certain claims of 

U.S. Patent No. 8,549,109 (‘‘the ’109 

patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 11,451,860 

(‘‘the ’860 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 

11,924,502 (‘‘the ’502 patent’’); and U.S. 

Patent No. 10,958,971 (‘‘the ’971 

patent’’). The complaint further alleges 

that an industry in the United States 

exists as required by the applicable 

Federal Statute. The complainant 

requests that the Commission institute 

an investigation and, after the 

investigation, issue a limited exclusion 

order and cease and desist orders. 

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for 

any confidential information contained 

therein, may be viewed on the 

Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) 

at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help 

accessing EDIS, please email 

EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired 

individuals are advised that information 

on this matter can be obtained by 

contacting the Commission’s TDD 

terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons 

with mobility impairments who will 

need special assistance in gaining access 

to the Commission should contact the 

Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 

2000. General information concerning 

the Commission may also be obtained 

by accessing its internet server at 

https://www.usitc.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 

Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. 

International Trade Commission, 

telephone (202) 205–2560. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Authority: The authority for 

institution of this investigation is 

contained in section 337 of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 

1337, and in section 210.10 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2024). 

Scope of Investigation: Having 

considered the complaint, the U.S. 

International Trade Commission, on 

September 23, 2024, ordered that— 

(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of 

section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended, an investigation be instituted 

to determine whether there is a 

violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of 

section 337 in the importation into the 

United States, the sale for importation, 

or the sale within the United States after 

importation of certain products 

identified in paragraph (2) by reason of 

infringement of one or more of claim 4 

of the ’109 patent; claims 7–11 of the 

’860 patent; claims 1, 4, 6, 11, 12, 15, 

17, and 22 of the ’502 patent; and claim 

1 of the ’971 patent, and whether an 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
79308 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 188 / Friday, September 27, 2024 / Notices 

1Based on the Government’s submissions in its 

RFAA dated October 17, 2023, the Agency finds 

that service of the OSC on Registrant was adequate. 

Specifically, the included declaration from a DEA 

Diversion Investigator indicates that on August 31, 

2023, Registrant was personally served with the 

OSC at his registered address. RFAAX 2, at 1; see 

also id. at 3 (Form DEA–12 signed by Registrant on 

August 31, 2023). 

industry in the United States exists as 

required by subsection (a)(2) of section 

337; 

(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of 

the Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the 

plain language description of the 

accused products or category of accused 

products, which defines the scope of the 

investigation, is ‘‘televisions with smart 

features and functionality’’; 

(3) For the purpose of the 

investigation so instituted, the following 

are hereby named as parties upon which 

this notice of investigation shall be 

served: 

(a) The complainant is: Maxell, Ltd., 

1. Koizumi, Oyamazaki, Oyamazaki-cho, 

Otokuni-gun, Kyoto, 618–8525 Japan. 

(b) The respondents are the following 

entities alleged to be in violation of 

section 337, and are the parties upon 

which the complaint is to be served: 

TCL Electronics Holdings Ltd. (f/k/a 

TCL, Multimedia Technology 

Holdings, Ltd.), 7th Floor, Building 

22E, 22 Science Park East Avenue, 

Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin, New 

Territories, Hong Kong 

TCL Industries Holdings Co., Ltd., 22nd 

Floor, TCL Technical Tower, Huifeng 

3 Road, Zhongkai Development, Zone 

Huizhou, Guangdong, China, 516006 

T.C.L. Industries Holdings (H.K.) 

Limited, 8th Floor, Building 22E, 

Phase Three, Hong Kong Science 

Park, Pak Shek Kok, New Territories, 

Hong Kong 

TTE Technology, Inc. (d/b/a TCL North 

America), 1860 Compton Avenue, 

Corona, CA 92881 

TTE Corporation, 7th Floor, Building 

22E, 22 Science Park East Avenue, 

Hong Kong Science Park, Shatin, New 

Territories, Hong Kong 

TCL King Electrical Appliances, 

(Huizhou) Co. Ltd., No. 78, Huifeng 4 

Road, Zhongkai Development Zone 

Huizhou, China, 516006 

Manufacturas Avanzadas S.A. de C.V., 

Blvd. Independecia No. 2151, Ciudad 

Juarez, Chihuahua, 32580, Mexico 

TCL Smart Device (Vietnam) Co., Ltd., 

No. 26 VSIP II–A, Street 32, Vietnam 

Singapore Industrial Park II–A, Tan 

Binh Commune, Bac Tan Uyen 

District, Binh Duong Province, 75000, 

Vietnam 

Shenzhen TCL New Technology Co., 

Ltd., 9th Floor, TCL Electronics 

Holdings Limited Building, TCL 

International E City, No. 1001 

Zhongshan Park Road, Nanshan, 

China, 518067 

TCL Optoelectronics Technology 

(Huizhou) Co., Ltd., No. 78, Huifeng 

4 Road, Zhongkai Development Zone 

Huizhou, China, 516006 

TCL Overseas Marketing Ltd., 5th Floor, 

Building 22E, 22 Science Park East 

Avenue, Hong Kong Science Park, 

Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong 

TCL Technology Group Corporation, (f/ 

k/a TCL Corp.), TCL Technology 

Building, No. 17, Huifeng Third Road, 

Zhongkai High-Tech Development 

Zone, Huizhou, Guangdong, China 

516001 

(c) The Office of Unfair Import 

Investigations, U.S. International Trade 

Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 

401, Washington, DC 20436; and 

(4) For the investigation so instituted, 

the Chief Administrative Law Judge, 

U.S. International Trade Commission, 

shall designate the presiding 

Administrative Law Judge. 

Responses to the complaint and the 

notice of investigation must be 

submitted by the named respondents in 

accordance with section 210.13 of the 

Commission’s Rules of Practice and 

Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 

19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as 

amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 

2020), such responses will be 

considered by the Commission if 

received not later than 20 days after the 

date of service by the complainant of the 

complaint and the notice of 

investigation. Extensions of time for 

submitting responses to the complaint 

and the notice of investigation will not 

be granted unless good cause therefor is 

shown. 

Failure of a respondent to file a timely 

response to each allegation in the 

complaint and in this notice may be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

right to appear and contest the 

allegations of the complaint and this 

notice, and to authorize the 

administrative law judge and the 

Commission, without further notice to 

the respondent, to find the facts to be as 

alleged in the complaint and this notice 

and to enter an initial determination 

and a final determination containing 

such findings, and may result in the 

issuance of an exclusion order or a cease 

and desist order or both directed against 

the respondent. 

By order of the Commission. 

Issued: September 24, 2024. 

Lisa Barton, 

Secretary to the Commission. 

[FR Doc. 2024–22187 Filed 9–26–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 7020–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 

Drug Enforcement Administration 

Theodore S. Wright Jr., M.D.; Decision 

and Order 

On August 30, 2023, the Drug 

Enforcement Administration (DEA or 

Government) issued an Order to Show 

Cause (OSC) to Theodore S. Wright Jr., 

M.D., of Chicago, Illinois (Registrant). 

Request for Final Agency Action 

(RFAA), Exhibit (RFAAX) 1, at 1, 3. The 

OSC proposed the revocation of 

Registrant’s Certificate of Registration 

No. AW2016651, alleging that 

Registrant’s registration should be 

revoked because Registrant is ‘‘currently 

without authority to prescribe, 

administer, dispense, or otherwise 

handle controlled substances in the 

State of Illinois, the state in which [he 

is] registered with DEA.’’ Id. at 1–2 

(citing 21 U.S.C. 824(a)(3)). 

The OSC notified Registrant of his 

right to file with DEA a written request 

for hearing, and that if he failed to file 

such a request, he would be deemed to 

have waived his right to a hearing and 

be in default. Id. at 2 (citing 21 CFR 

1301.43). Here, Registrant did not 

request a hearing. RFAA, at 2.1 ‘‘A 

default, unless excused, shall be 

deemed to constitute a waiver of the 

[registrant’s] right to a hearing and an 

admission of the factual allegations of 

the [OSC].’’ 21 CFR 1301.43(e). 

Further, ‘‘[i]n the event that a 

registrant . . . is deemed to be in 

default . . . DEA may then file a request 

for final agency action with the 

Administrator, along with a record to 

support its request. In such 

circumstances, the Administrator may 

enter a default final order pursuant to 

[21 CFR] § 1316.67.’’ Id. § 1301.43(f)(1). 

Here, the Government has requested 

final agency action based on Registrant’s 

default pursuant to 21 CFR 1301.43(c), 

(f), 1301.46. RFAA, at 1; see also 21 CFR 

1316.67. 

Findings of Fact 

The Agency finds that, in light of 

Registrant’s default, the factual 

allegations in the OSC are admitted. 

According to the OSC, effective 

February 21, 2023, the Illinois 

Department of Financial and 

Professional Regulation suspended 


lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1