alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Office of Personnel Management

Retirement and Insurance Service

1920 1954 1959 

 

1986 

Benefits Administration Letter

Number: 95-217 Date: May 25, 1995 

SUBJECT: Federal Employees Health Benefits

Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance

Information Staff for Handling Agency Inquiries

_________________________________________________________________

Earlier this year the Insurance Policy Division became the

Insurance Policy and Information Division. Policy staff remains

responsible for all policy work relating the the FEHB and FEGLI

Programs. Information staff is responsible for handling all

correspondence and telephone inquiries from agency headquarters

Insurance Officers, as well as other letters and telephone calls. 

I'd like to take this opportunity to formally introduce the

Information staff. They are:

Joyce Easter (on extended leave)

Jay Fritz

Michael Garth

James Holmes

Patricia Kennedy

Evelyn Sligh (detailed to another division)

Lottie Thompson

We are no longer using the voice message boxes on the Agency

Services Division's electronic phone system. Our Information

staff can be reached on 202-606-0191. There is no particular

member of the Information staff assigned to any specific agency;

you may direct your inquiries to any member of the Information

staff.

Please note that the above phone number is only for headquarters

Insurance Officers. We will refer any calls we receive from

field installations to the appropriate headquarters Insurance

Officer.

Abby L. Block, Chief

Insurance Policy
 and Information Division
Memorandum T o: Docket ID Number EPA

- HQ

- OAR

- 2 010

- 0 505 for Oil and Natural Gas

Sector: Emission Standards for New and Modified Sources

Re: EPA meeting with Chevron

Message: EPA /OAQPS staff met with representatives from Chevron on October 22, 2015, to

discuss their comments on the September 18, 2015, proposed oil and gas NSPS.

Attendees:

EPA

David Cozzie, Bruce Moore, Lisa Thompson, Jodi Howard, Charlene Spells,

Amy Hambrick

Chevron

Shankar Ananthakrishna, Vanessa Ryan

Attachments: 1
Exhibit 10.1

 

SECOND AMENDMENT TO 

CONSULTING AGREEMENT


 

 

WHEREAS, the Company and the Consultant entered into a
Consulting Agreement effective the 1st day of June, 2003, which
agreement was amended and restated by the Consulting Agreement (the "Agreement")
between Edward L. Moses and Horizon Offshore Contractors, Inc., entered into the
3rd day of December, 2003, and amended as of 1st day of April, 2004,
(the "First Amendment"); and 

 

WHEREAS the parties do hereby agree as follows the desire to
amend the Agreement as provided herein to conform the Agreement to the intent of
the parties at the time the Agreement was signed; 

 

NOW THEREFORE, for the mutual promises and covenants set
forth herein this, the Second Amendment to the Agreement is entered into by and
between the parties effective the 8th day of November, 2004:

 

1.     Unless otherwise defined herein, all capitalized terms
shall have the meaning assigned to them in the Agreement.

 

2.     The first and second sentences only of Section 1 (c) is
deleted in its entirety and replaced by the following, with the remainder of
Section 1 (c) remaining as stated:

 

(c)     In exchange for Consultant's services and covenants
hereunder, the Company shall pay Consultant a fee of U.S. $200,000.00 for
services rendered from June 1, 2003 to May 31, 2004, and $30,000 for services
for the remainder of the term of this Agreement. 

 

3.     For the avoidance of doubt, the Parties agree that the
total fees payable to Consultant for services rendered under the Agreement and
any Amendment thereto is $355,000, and that of this amount, Consultant has
received $334,900, so that upon signing this Second Amendment, Consultant will
be entitled to payment of $20,100 in full and final satisfaction of his fees for
services rendered. 

 

3.     Except as expressly modified herein, all other terms and
conditions of the Agreement and First Amendment are unchanged and remain in full
force and effect. 

 

 

	
		/s/ Edward L. Moses
	 	
		/s/ Bill J. Lam

	Consultant	 	Horizon Offshore Contractors, Inc.
	 	 	 
	
		Date:    November 8, 2004	 	
		Date:   November 8, 2004
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.A
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  /s/ James C. YardleyJames C. YardleyChairman of the Board and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company


February 28, 2007
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2010 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Laura Buss Sayavedra, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP,
general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 7, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    LAURA BUSS
SAYAVEDRA                                                                                                                                                                          
|                  |  |  |  | Laura Buss Sayavedra
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC
General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP
General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
EXHIBIT
31.1





CHIEF
EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION





I, P.
Morgan McCune, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Triple A Medical,
Inc.





2. Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;





4. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:





a)
designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;





b)
evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and





5. The
registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):





a) all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and





b) any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial
reporting.








Date:
August 9, 2008





/s/ P. Morgan
McCune





P. Morgan
McCune


President
and Chief Executive Officer
#### TEXAS EMPLOYERS’ INS. ASS’N v. WHITE.

Motion No. 12777; No. 6902.

Supreme Court of Texas.

June 30, 1937.

*361Lawther, Cox & Cramer and Shelby S. Cox, all of Dallas, for plaintiff in error.

Grisham Bros., of Eastland, and J. A. Lantz, of Austin, for defendant in error.

PER CURIAM.

The defendant in error having filed in this court a remittitur of $1,970.10 as of the date of the original judgment, which reduces the principal sum of that judgment from $6,352.41 to $4,382.31, and it appearing that the remittitur is sufficient to account for the greatest possible amount of excessiveness in the judgment, it is ordered that the judgment heretofore entered herein reversing and remanding the cause be set aside and in lieu thereof that the judgments of the trial court and of the Court of Civil Appeals be reformed so as to award to defendant in error a recovery of the amount above named and, as reformed, that said judgments be affirmed. Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Carr, 91 Tex. 332, 43 S.W. 18. The costs in this court will be assessed against defendant in error.
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of TRIPLE A MEDICAL, INC. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  May
18, 2009




/s/
P. Morgan McCune




Name:
P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer








Dated:  May
18, 2009




/s/
P. Morgan McCune




Name:
P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
Control No. ______________

 

VEHICLE RELEASE

OWNER’S NAME DATE

VIN YEAR MAKE & MODEL

VEHICLE ACCEPTED VEHICLE REJECTED

I, , owner ( ) and/or joint owner ( )

and/or principal driver ( ), acknowledge receipt of my vehicle in the same condition as when loaned to Jacobs, 

a contractor to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, on ________________________. I have inspected 

the vehicle for damage and release Jacobs of any responsibility for damage.

SIGNATURE DATE

Privacy Act Statement

Title 42, United States Code, Section 7451, Compliance by vehicles and engines in actual use, authorizes the 

collection of this information. The primary use is to provide an instrument by which individuals may indicate 

interest in and eligibility for participating in EPA’s Light-Duty In-Use Testing Program. Additional disclosures of 

this information may be made pursuant to published routine uses, including to appropriate agencies for law 

enforcement purposes and to contractors working for EPA who have a need to know in the course of that work.

Providing the requested information is voluntary, but failing to do so will result in EPA’s inability to approve your 

participation in the Light-Duty In-Use Testing Program.

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to vary from 1 to 60 minutes per 

response, with an average of 30 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching 

existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the 

collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this 

collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Chief, Information Policy Branch, 

PM-223, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,40l M St., S.W. Washington, DC. 20460; and to the Office 

of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC. 20503.

EPA Form #5900-304 OMB No. 2060-0086 Expires (###)
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended October 3, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Harlan M. Kent, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ Harlan M. Kent     
|Harlan M. Kent         
|Chief Executive Officer
|                       
|November 12, 2009      



39
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

peer air: 

Your request f 

carefully connldered by this 

request aa followm 

e quo;e Prom your 

r 8n oyinnton, 

r dtem 3fhll.e 

i)2* aoynton 

8 uutjagunoiir. duoto e prcv:ous 

uo to L&e sect that IL lnaiion or ~~o,ooo.i~o to eat&bi~iah 

ental B,tatioa at Siephen F. 

Austin Coflego, .he phmed to request .x&at 1 make 

this hurrkx'wlp LO Uaohlngcon, aa President of 

Our Board of Regents. 

"I acquiesced, ia apite of the fact thai 

previous eng~cmenxi iXui to bo canceileii, end I 

am glad to repoN. chat subsequently .ihia approprlatlon yas mde by our Uni$cd Scams Congrese, 

lihkh will help in the rehabilitation of' wme oe 
_ 

i 

P 

1 

1. 

i 

! 

.,, 

x%Tl 

thousando of ccrm of QUP East 'i'exe8 Wnds 

loa&+ usalcea through coiX sro2ion. 

Qy reason for br.U@.ng this to your 

attention la that ng good Prlet?ld, Cowtmllcr 

Worge g. Chcpheril, dbes i2ot tslleva the per 

tiem ia applicable except in atWmda3ce at vegulaw board meetings. MI?. J. II. vlnelp, Auditor 

‘of step&an p. Auatdn College, who mole ne about 

thia,~ atatod that 'this %e th# first ocwmicn t&&L 

the per diemof & board D)t?be?? cn afficlal buetiena 

had been questioned In kie 22 years uith tha 

college. * 

Seation 6 of Article 2547, V~FA~‘IP hnnota%d Text18 

Civil 3tatutas, raferrtig to the Board of Rcgmta of the state 

Fcochers Go~legca of i&i8 State, providoa as follonsr 

"The board aball meek eech gcer at Austin, 

on ths first Wonday ln &3.y, 0P a.8 soozk themaf2er aa 

praor.loabl.e, for cuha traneaction of buslnesn pertaining to the affai?e OS tha State ucnrjsl s;chools, 

and at euch othor time end Places ae n 11~~jo19t.y 

Of the menbars of the board deem nec~~eax+y for I;he 

WdXs~e of mild co2legeo. Each md cvczy mmber 

of said bof33d shall, ~r3:cc?ivc fLvs dollara per day for 

the time sp?,nC atGcndIr~ Lbe W2etigEY p~?OQ~bti f4r 

in thfa law, md &I addition themto the mno~zt of 

their traveling oxgcneoia, said cozpensa'~cbou tobe 

Paid to the soveml nzabex OP OK? lxmri? OUL 0: she 

apprsgM.acLon Tar the Gupi)oPt and ma%ni;enance of 

the mid 3te.t~ ?each$rn* Col.l.sses aa the bow1 snsy 

dhxL," 
. 1
# C_2017277EN.01005301.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/53

---

Action brought on 3 July 2017 — Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank v SRB

(Case T-414/17)

(2017/C 277/76)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vorarlberger Landes- und Hypothekenbank AG (Bregenz, Austria) (represented by: G. Eisenberger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss (SRB)

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05)’), and in any event to the extent that that decision concerns the applicant; and |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Single Resolution Board (SRB) (‘Decision of the Executive Session of the Board of 11 April 2017 on the calculation of the 2017 ex-ante contributions to the Single Resolution Fund (SRB/ES/SRF/2017/05)’), and in any event to the extent that that decision concerns the applicant; and

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of incomplete notification of the decision |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of incomplete notification of the decision

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a flagrant breach of essential procedural requirements by reason of an inadequate statement of reasons for the decision

---
##### 



Exhibit 10.1
 PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
   
 Purpose
 Effective Date
 Definitions
 Appendix A




---



##### 



- 2 -




---



##### 



- 3 -




---



##### 



Committee Powers
 Committee Action
 - 4 -




---



##### 



Committee Determinations Conclusive
 Committee Liability
 
 Eligibility
 Participation
 
 Normal Retirement Benefit
 Early Retirement Benefit
 - 5 -




---



##### 



Other Terminations of Employment
 Change in Control
 Death Benefits
 Death After Benefits Commence
 Death Before Benefits Commence
 Disability
 - 6 -




---



##### 



Termination for Cause
 Commencement of SERP Benefit Before Normal Retirement Date.
 Number of Years Prior toNormal Retirement Date
    
    Reduction Factorless than 1
    
    0.961 but less than 2
    
    0.922 but less than 3
    
    0.883 but less than 4
    
    0.844 but less than 5
    
    0.805 but less than 6
    
    0.766 but less than 7
    
    0.727 but less than 8
    
    0.688 but less than 9
    
    0.649 but less than 10
    
    0.6010 but less than 11
    
    0.5611 but less than 12
    
    0.5212 or more
    
    0.50
 Form Payment of Benefits.
 Default Form of Benefits
 Ten-Year Certain and Life Annuity
 - 7 -




---



##### 



Joint and 50% Survivor Annuity
 Optional Forms
 Commencement
 Lump Sum Election
 - 8 -




---



##### 



Involuntary Termination
 Offsets
 Conditions for Payment of Benefits
 Beneficiary Designations
 Payments to Minors and Incompetents
 - 9 -




---



##### 



Withholding of Taxes
 
 Benefits Payable From General Assets
 
 Limitation of Rights
    Nonalienation of Benefits
 - 10 -




---



##### 



Prerequisites to Benefits
 
 Filing Original Claim
 Appeal to Committee
 
 Amendment or Termination of the Plan
 Parachute Payment Limitation.
 - 11 -




---



##### 



Reliance Upon Information
 Governing Law
 Severability
 Headings
 Word Usage
 Nonwaiver
 - 12 -




---



##### 



Plan on File
 Notices
 Section 409A
    PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.Attest:/s/
W. Gregory Looser
    
    
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Louis A. RaspinoW.
Gregory Looser
    
    
    
    
    
    Louis A. RaspinoSecretary
    
    
    
    
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 - 13 -




---



##### 



PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
  APPENDIX A
 Actuarial Equivalent
 Appendix A Appendix
A Appendix A
  - 14 -