alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1 DISABOOM, INC.
CERTIFICATION I, J.W. Roth
certify that: 1.          
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Disaboom, Inc. 2.          Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3.          Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report; 4.          The
registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: a)          Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared; b)          Intentionally
omitted. c)          Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and d)          Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the
registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and 5.          The
registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): a)          all
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize, and
report financial information; and b)          any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. Date: August
14, 2008 /s/ J.W.
  RothPrincipal
  Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(b) OR RULE 15d-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Yankee Holding Corp. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Craig W. Rydin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/ CRAIG W. RYDIN     
|Craig W. Rydin         
|Chief Executive Officer
|August 10, 2007
# C_2018399EN.01001001.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Vincent Piessevaux v Council of the European Union

(Case C-454/17 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII - Pension rights acquired under a national scheme - Transfer of those rights to the EU pension scheme - Difference in treatment between officials who have had the capital representing their pension rights transferred to the EU scheme before and after the entry into force of new implementing provisions))

(2018/C 399/12)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: Vincent Piessevaux (represented by: L. Ponteville, avocat)

Other party: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr Vincent Piessevaux to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Vincent Piessevaux to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.

---
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

223) ll-K- (I) -36 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/2008 11:12:56 AM Sheet 223 of 325 
P.2 

/A\ R a = 0 

II-K-(I)-36 

BOILER SIZE/CAPACITY UTILIZATION DISTRIBUTION. 

EEA, Inc. 

October 8, 1979. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(I)-36
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     We consent to the use in this Registration Statement on    Form S-1    of our (1) report dated March 27, 2007 relating to the    combined financial statements and financial statement schedule    of Spectra Energy Partners Predecessor (which report expresses    an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph    relating to the preparation of the combined financial statements    of Spectra Energy Partners Predecessor from the separate records    maintained by Spectra Energy Capital, LLC), (2) report dated    March 27, 2007, relating to the balance sheet of Spectra    Energy Partners, LP and (3) report    dated March 27, 2007, relating to the balance sheet of    Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP all appearing in the    Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.     We also consent to the reference to us under the headings    “Experts” in    such Prospectus. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP    Houston, Texas    March 27, 2007
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                     
|----------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 

I, Seth Shaw, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

|(1) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Kitcher Resources,
      Inc. for the period ended October 31, 2008 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Kitcher Resources, Inc..                                                                  

Dated: December 22, 2008

| | /s/ *Seth Shaw*                                               
| | --------------------------------------------------------------
| | Seth Shaw                                                     
| | President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary,
      Treasurer
| | and Director                                                  
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial       
| | Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)                     
| | Kitcher Resources, Inc.                                       

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Kitcher
Resources, Inc. and will be retained by Kitcher Resources, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 10.3
    
          1.
    The following shall be added to the Agreement as
    Section 5.B(iv):  Movement of Segments between Travelport
    GDSs. Segment-by-Segment
  2.
    General.  This Second Amendment shall be
    binding upon and inure to the benefit of and be enforceable by
    the Parties hereto or their successors in interest, except as
    expressly provided in the Agreement. Each Party to this Second
    Amendment agrees that, other than as expressly set out in this
    Second Amendment, nothing in this Second Amendment is intended
    to alter the rights, duties and obligations of the Parties under
    the Agreement, which shall remain in full force and effect as
    amended hereby. In the event of a conflict between the terms and
    conditions of this Second Amendment and the terms and conditions
    of the Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Second
    Amendment shall govern. This Second Amendment may be executed by
    the Parties in separate counterparts and each counterpart shall
    be deemed to be an original, but all such counterparts shall
    together constitute one and the same instrument.




---



##### 



Orbitz Worldwide, LLC

Galileo International, L.L.C./s/  Stephen
    C. Praven

/s/  Michael
    DoddsName: Stephen C. Praven

Name: Michael DoddsTitle: VP, Business Development

Title: GVP, Commercial FinanceDate: 8/07/08

Date: June 10, 2008Galileo Nederland B.V./s/  Marco
    van IeperenName: Marco van IeperenTitle: DirectorDate: 30 June 2008
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB ("Form 10-QSB") of Grand Monarch Holdings, Inc.,  (the "Company") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Joseph Meuse, President and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)  The Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  /s/ Joseph Meuse --------------------------- Joseph Meuse President and Chief Executive Officer October 11, 2007
# C_2019407EN.01000401.xml

| 3.12.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 407/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 407/4

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions

at its meeting on 3 May 2019 concerning a draft decision in

Case AT.40134 — AB InBev Beer Trade Restrictions

Rapporteur: Germany

(2019/C 407/04)

1.

The Advisory Committee (8 Member States) agrees with the Commission that the conduct covered by the draft decision constitutes an abuse of a dominant position that infringes Article 102 TFEU.

2.

The Advisory Committee (8 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s assessment in the draft decision as regards the duration of the infringement.

3.

The Advisory Committee (8 Member States) agrees with the Commission that a remedy should be imposed, as set out in the draft decision.

4.

The Advisory Committee (8 Member States) agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

5.

The Advisory Committee (8 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amount of the fine, including its reduction based on paragraph 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines, imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003.

6.

The Advisory Committee (8 Member States) agrees Advisory Committee recommend the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3296 

To clarify that the oath of allegiance to the United States administered 

in the naturalization process may not be altered. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mrs. BLACK (for herself, Mr. MILLER of Florida, Mr. BARLETTA, Mr. DUNCAN of Tennessee, Mr. CHABOT, Mr. FINCHER, Mr. FLEISCHMANN, Mr. 

DONOVAN, Mrs. BLACKBURN, Mr. OLSON, Mr. WESTMORELAND, Mr. 

BABIN, Mr. PEARCE, Mr. MCCLINTOCK, Ms. JENKINS of Kansas, Mr. 

SALMON, Mr. CONAWAY, Mr. HARPER, Mr. LAMALFA, Mr. YOUNG of 

Alaska, Mr. GOHMERT, Mr. CURBELO of Florida, Mr. ROUZER, Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, Mr. POE of Texas, and Mr. NUGENT) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To clarify that the oath of allegiance to the United States 

administered in the naturalization process may not be 

altered. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Restore the Oath of 

5 Allegiance Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3296 IH

1 SEC. 2. OATH OF ALLEGIANCE. 

2 Beginning on the date of enactment of this Act, the 

3 oath taken under section 337 of the Immigration and Na4 tionality Act (8 U.S.C. 1448) shall be the same formula5 tion and shall be subject to the same potential omissions 

6 or alterations from such formulation, as the formulation 

7 of such oath administered on July 20, 2015. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
[No. 18487-1-III.

Division Three.

October 26, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Lorelie A. Tucker, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Kittitas County, No. 98-1-00201-7, Michael W. Leavitt, J., entered May 27, 1999. *Affirmed in part*and *remanded*by unpublished opinion per Kurtz, C.J., concurred in by Schultheis and Brown, JJ.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7283** 

NEKITA ANTONIO WHITE , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,
v. S. JONES, Correctional Officer; MATTHEW WHALEN, Lt. Officer , Defendants

– Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Alexandria
. T. S. Ellis, III , Senior District Judge. ( 1:10

- cv - 00799

- TSE

- TRJ )

Submitted : December 16, 2010 Decided: December 29, 2010

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and DAVIS , Circuit Judges
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Nekita Antonio White, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Nekita Antonio White appeals the district court ’ s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1 983 (200 6 ) complaint under 28
U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (200 6 ). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. White v. Jones , No. 1:10

- cv 00799

- TSE

- TRJ (E.D. Va. Aug. 23, 2010) . W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
From: Wade, Dennis@ARB

To: Ungvarsky, John

Subject: REVISED SJV Budgets PM10 emissions reductions tons.xlsx

Date: Thursday, May 05, 2016 3:15:40 PM

Attachments: REVISED SJV Budgets PM10 emissions reductions tons.xlsx

Revised as discussed on our call earlier. D.
### Tom Kilpatrick

6412 Briarwood Lane Nichols Hills, OK 73116

- 5612

January 20 , 2016

Mr. John S. Duncan, Director Flight Standards Service

Federal Aviation Administration

Re: FAA Section 333 Exemption No. 12152 Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1661

Mr. Duncan:

I petition the FAA to amend Exemption No. 12152 to Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1661 for operations up to 400 feet

AGL and within five miles of Wiley Post Airport (KPWA) in Oklahoma City, OK

.

I have operate d UAVs for 12 months without incident, gaini ng experience and mastering flight controls of a variety of systems including the DJI Inspire 1 . Many of these flights have taken place in a variety of controlled airspaces around the United

States to an altitude of 400 feet AGL and within five miles of ai rports (including Wiley Post Airport) with permission of local air traffic controllers. Some of these flights involved the use of handheld aviation radios.

These are my Methods of Operation to b e applied to these requested flights (using the reference “we” in speaking of the PIC

and Visual Observer):

 We will survey the area in which we propose to operate for hazards to flight (trees, power lines, towers, etc.). We will not operate over crowds or crowded highways.

 We will preflight the aircraft prior to all flights to ensure airworthiness.

 We will launch only after successfully performing a magnetic compass calibration.

 We will launch only when adequate satellite reception has been acquired that identifies the “ho me point .”

 We will launch to a height of approximately 10 feet and exercise all flight controls (forward, backward, left, right, yaw left and yaw right) at 100% control stick deflection.

 We will rarely go above 200 feet AGL, but occasionally to 400 feet AGL to provide visual perspective.

 We will remain within 1,000 feet of the launch point.

 We will return to the launch point and land when battery power indicates 30%.

 We will conduct a postflight inspection immediately after landing to verify that no da mage has occurred.

 When within five miles of an airport w e will communicate with appropriate FAA air traffic controllers prior to and following flight operations, and during operations if requested.

 When within five miles of an airport w e will monitor local Tower or CTAF radio frequencies during operations, and when necessary report the UAV’s position to manned aircraft.

 We will give way to all manned aircraft (fixed wing and helicopters).

I believe that approval of this petition will serve the public safely providing aerial photography and videography up to 400

feet AGL and within five miles of Wiley Post Airport , while maintaining a positive communication link between UAV operator and

air traffic controllers.

Sincerely,

Tom Kilpatr ick
August 14,2012 Ms. Aloha Ley Associate Ditector Office ofAviation Analysis gth Floor, Room W86-310, 1200New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 Dear Ms. Ley: The Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport serving Springfield, Illinois, has submitted a Small Community Air Service Development Grant inresponse to the Department's request for proposals underDocket DOT-OST-2012-0069.**-~** ! .,,..

Springfield's application seeks $250,000 in federal assistance from this program. The community ofSptingfield, wotking closely with the Airport, is proposing to commit $100,000 in local matching funds plus $70,0.00 ofin,-kind support. The goal ofthis grant is to recruit new nonstop air service at Springfield. Air service is essential to the well-being ofthe local economy. While Springfield is the state capital ofIllinois, state government, as well as local private industry, educational institutions and the general public, all rely onlocal air service. Unfol1ut1ately, Springfield air service is in decline

.. We suffered greatly from the elimination of connecting hub operations and service at St. Louis by American in the wake ofthe merger with TWA. Our currentAmerican Eagle service is cuttailed due to the ongoing financial reorganization at that cru:rier. Finally,justthis lastMarch, Direct Air, which we had worked very hard to recruit 

### to offer low fare less-than-daily service, abruptly terminated**service~** Our airline capacity is down nearly46% since 2004. The loss ofDirect Air means that this coming winter we will be down an additional 36% withoutDirect Ait's service to two destinations. Om· community's application targets rectuitment ofnew nonstop service to replace the service lost with DirectAir. Our Airport haspresented proposals to several airlines in recent weeks and months and with grant support through this program, we are confident that ourairportwill be able to secure areplacement carrier to fill the void.

1011 

### s. Second Street Springfield • IL 62704 T: 217.525.1173 F: 217.525.8768 W: www.gscc.orgItis imperative we have a strong airport with adequate service options to satisfy the diverse needs ofour cornmunity. Itis necessary that we have a balance ofstrong daily t1etwork air service to connecting hub facilities and a variety ofother low-fare nonstop options to popular destinations. The Greater Springfield Area Chamber ofCommerce fully suppot1S this application and the efforts ofourairport to provide critical transportation options for our community. The Chamber is ready to support the airport ifit is successful in seeuring this grant. We urge the Department to award Sptingfield a grant to assist inour continued air service improvements efforts.

Ste ar andstrom, CCE President & CEO The Greater Springfield Chamber ofCommerce Quantum Growth Partnership (QS)

1011 S. Second Street Springfield • ll 62704 T: 217.525.1173 ' F: 217.525.8768 W: www.gscc.org