alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


Written Statement of Chief Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002




The undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of Colonial Properties Trust, our
general partner, hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           the Form 10-Q of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership for the
              period ended September 30, 2003 filed on the date hereof with the
              Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report) fully complies
              with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
              Exchange Act of 1934; and

(b)           information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of Colonial Realty Limited Partnership.







                                             /s/  Howard B. Nelson, Jr.
                                                --------------------------
                                                  Howard B. Nelson, Jr.
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  November 13, 2003
**Exhibit 23.9****CONSENT TO BE NAMED A DIRECTOR**     I hereby consent to the use of my name and any references to me as a person to be appointed asa director of Superior Offshore International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), in theCompany’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (Registration No. 333-136567) filed with the U.S.Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “SecuritiesAct”), and any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) thereto and in anyregistration statement for the same offering filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Actand any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) thereto (collectively, the“Registration Statement”). I also consent to the filing of this consent as an exhibit to theRegistration Statement.        Dated: February 18, 2007                 /s/ Eric N. Smith
**EXHIBIT 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT RESERVE ENGINEERS**     Ryder Scott Company has issued a report as of December 31, 2006 of the “Estimated FutureReserves and Income Attributable to Certain Leasehold interests (SEC Case)” for Ultra PetroleumCorp. Ryder Scott Company consents to the reference in Form 10-K to Ryder Scott Company reservereport dated January 30, 2007 referenced in “*Item 2. Properties — Oil and Gas Reserves*” exclusiveof future income taxes and to the incorporation by reference of our Firm’s name and report intoUltra’s previously filed Registration Statements on Form S-8 (File Nos. 333-132443; 333-13342;333-13278) and Form S-3 (File No. 333-89522).         /s/ RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.         RYDER SCOTT COMPANY, L.P.Houston, Texas
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

Present: Judges Elder, Alston and Senior Judge Willis

NPM, INC. 25 AND 

 MERCHANTS OF VIRGINIA, G.S.I.A.

MEMORANDUM OPINION*

v. Record No. 0246-13-4 PER CURIAM

JUNE 11, 2013

JOHN BENJAMIN RODGERS

FROM THE VIRGINIA WORKERS’ COMPENSATION COMMISSION

(Joshua M. Wulf; Angela F. Gibbs; Midkiff, Muncie & Ross, P.C.,

on brief), for appellants.

(Robert J. Strayhorne, on brief), for appellee.

NPM, Inc. 25 and Merchants of Virginia, G.S.I.A. (appellants) appeal rulings of the 

Workers’ Compensation Commission regarding claims for compensation relating to the January 

8, 2010 work-related accident of John Benjamin Rodgers (appellee). Appellants claim the 

commission erred: 1) in finding that 25%, rather than 17%, of appellee’s 37% permanent partial 

disability rating for his left lower extremity was attributable to work-related injury; 2) in 

crediting the opinions of appellee’s treating physicians, rather than the physician who evaluated 

appellee at appellants’ request, in apportioning that disability rating; and 3) in finding that injury 

to appellee’s right knee was a compensable consequence of appellee’s work-related accident.

We have reviewed the record and the commission’s opinion and find that this appeal is without 

merit. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the commission in its final opinion. See

Rodgers v. NPM, Inc., VWC File VA000-0020-9041 (Jan. 10, 2013). We dispense with oral 

argument and summarily affirm because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented 

 * Pursuant to Code § 17.1-413, this opinion is not designated for publication.

UNPUBLISHED
- 2 -

in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. See Code 

§ 17.1-403; Rule 5A:27.

Affirmed.
FILED IN14th COURT OF APPEALS      HOUSTON, TEXAS  7/6/2015 8:30:24 PMCHRISTOPHER A. PRINE                Clerk
| **Regulatory Restrictions and Capital Adequacy - Additional Information (Detail) (USD $)** | 12 Months Ended |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|
||
| **Regulatory Capital Requirements [Abstract]**                                             |            |   |   |
| Cash Dividends Declared per Common Share (in dollars per share)                            | $ 0.23          | $ 0.18 | $ 0.12 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Aggregate dividends declared during the period for each share of common stock outstanding.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher SEC -Name Regulation S-X (SX) -Number 210 -Section 04 -Article 3Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/presentationRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 505 -SubTopic 10 -Section S99 -Paragraph 1 -Subparagraph (SX 210.3-04) -URI http://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=6959260&loc=d3e187085-122770
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_CommonStockDividendsPerShareDeclared**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**num:perShareItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                         |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_RegulatoryCapitalRequirementsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
#### STEPP v. STATE.

No. 17940.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 19, 1936.

Vance Swaim, of Crowell, and Williams & Bell, of Childress, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

*353MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed. See Meadows v. State (Tex.Civ.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
II 

Calendar No. 616 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3231 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 12, 2016 

Received 

SEPTEMBER 6, 2016 

Read the first time 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2016 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect unpaid 

interns in the Federal Government from workplace harassment and discrimination, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Intern Protec5 tion Act of 2016’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 3231 PCS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITED PERSONNEL PRACTICES. 

2 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 2302 of title 5, United 

3 States Code, is amended by adding at the end the fol4 lowing: 

5 ‘‘(g)(1) All protections afforded to an employee under 

6 subparagraphs (A), (B), and (D) of subsection (b)(1) shall 

7 be afforded, in the same manner and to the same extent, 

8 to an intern and an applicant for internship. 

9 ‘‘(2) For purposes of the application of this sub10 section, a reference to an employee shall be considered a 

11 reference to an intern in— 

12 ‘‘(A) section 717 of the Civil Rights Act of 

13 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000e–16); 

14 ‘‘(B) sections 12 and 15 of the Age Discrimina15 tion in Employment Act of 1967 (29 U.S.C. 631, 

16 633a); and 

17 ‘‘(C) section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 

18 1973 (29 U.S.C. 791). 

19 ‘‘(3) In this subsection, the term ‘intern’ means an 

20 individual who performs uncompensated voluntary service 

21 in an agency to earn credit awarded by an educational in22 stitution or to learn a trade or occupation.’’. 

23 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—Section 3111(c)(1) 

24 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by inserting 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

HR 3231 PCS

1 ‘‘section 2302(g) (relating to prohibited personnel prac2 tices),’’ before ‘‘chapter 81’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives January 11, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 616 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 3231 

AN ACT 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to protect 

for other purposes. workplace harassment and discrimination, and unpaid interns in the Federal Government from 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2016 

Read the second time and placed on the calendar 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D16-2228

_____________________________

RENARD NEALIE WILLIAMS,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County.

Jennie M. Kinsey, Judge.

February 21, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and LEWIS, and MAKAR, JJ., concur. 

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant 

Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Renard Nealie 

Williams, pro se, Appellant.
2

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, 

Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Annual Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth R. Posner, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) the Report fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.



March 14, 2005



|                                                                                                
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/S/    KENNETH R.
POSNER                                                                        
|Kenneth R. Posner Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial
Officer
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
February 23, 2007
 STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation
    
    000-50132
(Commission File No.)
    
    76-0502785
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
 333 Clay Street, Suite 3600
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal execute offices)
    
    77002-4109
(Zip Code)
 (713) 650-3700
 Not Applicable
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



##### 



Item 5.02(e). Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
 Payment of Bonuses Pursuant to the Bonus Plan
 Bonus Plan
 Maximum Possible
    
    ActualBonus Payment
    
    Bonus PaymentRichard K. Crump
    
    President and Chief Executive Officer
    
    $
    267,003
    
    
    $
    267,003Paul G. Vanderhoven
    
    Senior Vice President  Finance and Chief Financial Officer
    
    
    87,974
    
    
    
    87,974Kenneth M. Hale
    
    Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
    
    
    60,863
    
    
    
    60,863Paul C. Rostek
    
    Senior Vice President  Commercial
    
    
    57,851
    
    
    
    57,851Walter B. Treybig
    
    Senior Vice President  Manufacturing
    
    
    53,401
    
    
    
    53,401
  1




---



##### 



Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
 (d)
    
    Exhibits
 *10.1
    
    Bonus Plan (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit 10.12 to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005).
 
 *
    
    Management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements. 2




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  Date: February 28, 2007
    STERLING CHEMICALS, INC.By:
    /s/ Paul G. VanderhovenPaul G. VanderhovenSenior Vice President  Finance and Chief
Financial Officer 3




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description10.1
    
    Bonus Plan (incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit
10.12 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005)
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3255 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude from gross income 

certain amounts realized on the disposition of property raised or produced 

by a student farmer, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 28, 2015 

Mr. MCCAUL (for himself, Mr. CUELLAR, and Mr. CONAWAY) introduced the 

following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude 

from gross income certain amounts realized on the disposition of property raised or produced by a student 

farmer, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Student Agriculture 

5 Protection Act of 2015’’. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3255 IH

1 SEC. 2. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN GAIN BY STUDENT FARM2 ERS FROM GROSS INCOME. 

3 (a) IN GENERAL.—Part III of subchapter B of chap4 ter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended 

5 by inserting after section 139E the following new section: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 139F. GAIN FROM PROPERTY PRODUCED OR RAISED 

7 BY A STUDENT FARMER. 

8 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a student farmer, 

9 gross income shall not include so much of the gains from 

10 qualified dispositions for the taxable year as does not ex11 ceed $5,000. 

12 ‘‘(b) DEFINITIONS.—For the purposes of this sec13 tion— 

14 ‘‘(1) STUDENT FARMER.—The term ‘student 

15 farmer’ means an individual who has not attained 

16 age 18, and who is— 

17 ‘‘(A) enrolled in a program established by 

18 Future Farmers of America, or 

19 ‘‘(B) enrolled in a 4–H club. 

20 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED DISPOSITION AND QUALIFIED

21 PROPERTY.— 

22 ‘‘(A) The term ‘qualified disposition’ 

23 means a sale or exchange by or on behalf of a 

24 person who is a student farmer at the time of 

25 the sale or exchange— 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3255 IH

1 ‘‘(i) of qualified property produced or 

2 raised by that student farmer, and 

3 ‘‘(ii) that occurs during an activity of 

4 a type described in subparagraph (2)(B) or 

5 (3)(B) of section 513(d). 

6 ‘‘(B) The term ‘qualified property’ means 

7 personal property, including livestock, produced 

8 or raised by a student farmer under the super9 vision of a program described in subparagraph 

10 (A) or (B) of paragraph (1).’’. 

11 (b) CONFORMING AMENDMENT.—The table of sec12 tions for part III of subchapter B of chapter 1 of the In13 ternal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by inserting 

14 after the item relating to section 139E the following new 

15 item: 

‘‘Sec. 139F. Certain gain by student farmers’’. 

16 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

17 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

18 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### BALCH v. STATE.

No. 19835.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1938.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for possessing whisky for the purpose of sale in dry territory, punishment assessed at a fine of five hundred dollars.

By proper affidavit filed in this court appellant advises that she no further desires to prosecute the appeal.

In compliance with appellant’s request the appeal is dismissed.
#### BULLOCK v. STATE.

No. 19828.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1938.

Leslie A. Prichard, of Dallas, for appellant. -

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Conviction is for passing a forged instrument; punishment, confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of four years.

The record is before us without a statement of facts or bills of exceptions. No defect in the indictment' or procedure has been pointed out or perceived. Consequently, no question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
PAGE F-14
EXHIBIT 22

PARENT AND SUBSIDIARIES
     (Included in the Consolidated Financial Statements and Wholly-owned)

National Presto Industries, Inc.
Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

              Its Subsidiaries:
                    National Holding Investment Company
                    Wilmington, Delaware (A Delaware Corporation)

                    Its Subsidiaries:
                          Presto Manufacturing Company
                          Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                          Its Division:
                                Presto Products Manufacturing Company
                                Alamogordo, New Mexico

                          Century Leasing and Liquidating, Inc.
                          Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)

                          Its Subsidiary:
                                Presto Export, Inc. (Inactive)
                                Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)

                          Jackson Sales and Storage Company
                          Jackson, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                          Canton Sales & Storage Company
                          Canton, Mississippi (A Mississippi Corporation)

                          Presto Parts & Service, Inc. (Inactive)
                          Los Angeles, California (A California Corporation)

                          Presto Export, Ltd.
                          Christiansted, St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands 
                               (A Virgin Islands Corporation)

                    National Defense Corporation
                    Eau Claire, Wisconsin (A Wisconsin Corporation)

                    NPI Export Corporation (Inactive)
                    Minneapolis, Minnesota (A Minnesota Corporation)

                    National Presto Industries Export Corporation (Inactive)
                    Wilmington, Delaware (A Delaware Corporation)

Operating results of all subsidiaries are included in the 1995 Annual Report to
Stockholders.
WILLIAM L OWENS 

23itD DiamicT, NE W YORK 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES 

Am AND LAN D FonciS 

STFUTEG K FORCES 

COMMITTEE ON 

HOMELAND SECURITY 

EMMOwa THPIIATS, CvKmECuniTV, AM O 

SCIENCI AMO TECHNCXOOV 

EMtnOENCT COMMUNKATKINS, 

PKEPAAEOtgCSI AND nESP0N9E 

Conflregflf of tt)t IBnitth ^tatts 

J^ouit of £epresrentatibe0 

^Stotiingtom SC 20315 

September 24, 2010 

810-100020-036 

PLtASt HESPONO rO 

WAGHtNGTON OFFICE 

U 23ea RAV«UR S HOUSE OFFICE BUHBN O 

WAIHINOTON , DC 30S1&-3123 

<20a) 225^81 1 

DiSTBICT OFHCE: 

L J 120 WASHINOTO M STMEET, Su m 300 

WATiBTOWK NY 13B01-3370 

(315)712-3150 

L J 14 DUUKEE STKEET, Sum 320 

PLATTsaunOH, NY 12WJ1~299t 

15181 5S3-140e 

Secretaiy Ray LaHood 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

400 7th Street, SW 

Washington. DC 20590-0001 

Dear Secretary LaHood, 

I would like to express my support for the U.S. Department of Transportation Small Commitetty Aif 

Service Development Program Grant Application submitted by the City of Syracuse, NY andlie 

CenterState Corporation for Economic C^^portunity. This grant would be used to enhance the quahty of 

air service currently available at the Syracuse Hancock International Airport, as well as to attract new, 

low cost air-lines to the facility. 

The Syracuse Airport serves Central and Northern New York, where a lack of affordable air fare has been 

a serious and consistent issue, negatively impacting the local business community. The airport has been 

working in conjunction with a strong coalition of local elected officials, economic developers, and 

business leaders to improve the region's air service for some time now. Recently, the City of Syracuse; in 

collaboration with the CenterState Corporation for Economic Opportunity, applied for a $1,000,000 grant, 

to be combined with a $300,000 commitment &om local businesses. This money will be used to attract 

new, low'cost carriers to the Airport, not only improving the quality and affordability of the air services 

offered at Hancock Airport, but helping local business and benefitting the broader Central and Northern 

New York Region as well. 

I ask that you give this application your most thoughtful and serious consideratioiL If you need any 

additional information, please contact Madeline Donovan in my Watertown office at (31S) 782-3150. 

Sincerely, 

/<3U/^%^^ 

Bill Owens 

Member of Congress 

WLO/md 

PFllNTED ON BECVaE O PAPEfl