alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES ARMY COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS 

Before 

SALUSSOLIA, SALADINO, and ALDYKIEWICZ 

Appellate Military Judges 

UNITED STATES, Appellee 

v. 

Specialist JORDAN T. ELIE 

United States Army, Appellant 

ARMY 20160112 

Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division 

Jeffery D. Lippert and Lanny J. Acosta, Jr., Military Judges 

Colonel Russell N. Parson, Staff Judge Advocate 

For Appellant: Major Julie L. Borchers, JA; Captain Oluwaseye Awoniyi, JA (on 

brief). 

For Appellee: Lieutenant Colonel Wayne H. Williams, JA (on brief). 

4 April 2019 

-------------------------------------------------------------- 

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ON FURTHER REVIEW 

-------------------------------------------------------------- 

Per Curiam: 

 

 This case comes before us again under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military 

Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866 [UCMJ] following a rehearing on sentence. When we 

originally reviewed this case, we set aside appellant’s conviction for attempted 

abusive sexual contact (Article 80, UCMJ) and affirmed one specification of sexual 

assault (Article 120, UCMJ) after reviewing the military judge’s erroneous 

propensity instruction through the lenses of United States v. Hills, 75 M.J. 350 

(C.A.A.F. 2016), United States v. Hukill, 76 M.J. 219 (C.A.A.F. 2017), and United 

States v. Guardado, 77 M.J. 90 (C.A.A.F. 2017). United States v. Elie, ARMY 

20160112, 2018 CCA LEXIS 17 (Army Ct. Crim. App. 16 Jan. 2018). In remanding 

the case to the convening authority, we authorized a rehearing on the Article 80 

offense as well as on sentencing. Id. at *11. 

 On remand, the convening authority dismissed the Article 80 offense. 

Appellant opted to have the military judge sit as a general court-martial for his 

sentence rehearing for the Article 120 offense. The military judge sentenced 
ELIE—ARMY 20160112 

2 

appellant to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for twenty-four months, 

forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to the grade of E-1. 

We have reexamined this case, to include the assignments of error originally 

raised by appellant in his 14 April 2017 brief and matters personally raised by 

appellant pursuant to United States v. Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982). Having 

conducted a complete review of the case, we stand by our original resolution of these 

matters. 

CONCLUSION 

The findings of guilty and the sentence imposed at the rehearing are 

AFFIRMED. 

FOR THE COURT: 

 MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

Clerk of Court 

MALCOLM H. SQUIRES, JR. 

Clerk of Court 

FOR THE COURT:
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 324 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS

2 

HR 324 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. LT. DANIEL P. RIORDAN POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. 

4 Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

5 ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan 

10 Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 

mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Rule 13a-14(d)/15d-14(d) Certifications. 

 

I, Brian Baker, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form 10-D required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this report on Form 10-K of the J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage Securities Trust 2012-CIBX (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

 

2. Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other information required to be provided under Form 10-D for the period covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic reports;

 

4. Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statements required in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicers have fulfilled their obligations under the servicing agreements in all material respects; and

 

5. All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed securities required to be included in this report in accordance with Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 have been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form 10-K.

 

In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

 

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Master Servicer, Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Special Servicer, U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Certificate Administrator, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Custodian, TriMont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Senior Trust Advisor, CoreLogic Commercial Real Estate Services, Inc., as Servicing Function Participant, National Tax Search, LLC, as Servicing Function Participant and Midland Loan Services, a Division of PNC Bank, National Association, as Primary Servicer.

 

Dated: March 30, 2015

 

 

/s/ Brian Baker

 

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

(senior officer in charge of securitization of the depositor)
EXHIBIT 23.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe consent to the incorporation byreference in this Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 333-143979 on Form S-3 of ourreports dated March 14, 2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statementschedules of Pioneer Companies, Inc. and subsidiaries (“Pioneer”), and management’s report on theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in the Annual Report on Form10-K/A of Pioneer for the year ended December 31, 2006, and to the reference to usunder the heading“Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of such Registration Statement.DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPHouston, Texas
#### WILSON v. STATE.

No. 15413.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 1, 1932.

Rehearing Denied June 24, 1932.

John N. Gauntt and Joe W. Taylor, both Waco, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CALHOUN, J.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for seven years.

No bills, of exception are found in the record. Notice of appeal was given and entered of record on December 23, 1931. The statement of facts was filed in the trial court on April 25, 1932, which was more than ninety days after notice of appeal was given. This was too late under the provisions of article 760, C. C. P. Davis v. State, 105 Tex. Cr. R. 348, 287 S. W. 1100. However, we have read the statement of facts, and if we had been authorized to consider same, we would feel constrained to hold the evidence sufficient to support the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.

On Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing.

CHRISTIAN, J.

Appellant did not object to the testimony of the officers touching the result of the search of his automobile. However, he takes the position that the statement of facts shows that the search was illegal, and insists that notwithstanding the evidence was admitted upon the trial without objection, this court should reverse the judgment if there is no other evidence in the record than that which might have been eliminated by proper objection at the time it was tendered by the state. The holding in Wilson v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 48 S.W.(2d) 282, where the identical question was considered, is controlling. It was there held that the position taken by the appellant could not be sustained.

The motion for rehearing is overruled.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
#### The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, *v.*Henry A. Seager, Defendant.

County Court, Monroe County,

March 13, 1958.

*262
      *Henry A. Seager,*defendant in person.

*Harry L. Rosenthal, District Attorney (John A. Mastrella*of counsel), for plaintiff.

George D. Ogden, J.

Defendant was convicted September 19, 1956 of a violation of section 483-b of the Penal Law — carnal abuse of a child; defendant had previously been convicted of sodomy in the first degree, and was thereupon sentenced as a second felony offender. Defendant’s first motion — to set aside the jury’s verdict of guilty of the present charge — is, in all respects denied, as the defendant could have raised any question regarding such conviction by the appropriate remedy of an appeal.

The crime of which the defendant was convicted became a felony through operation of law. A violation of section 483-b is a misdemeanor unless the person violating that section has previously been convicted of certain misdemeanors or felonies, including sodomy, when the violation becomes a felony. Since defendant had previously been convicted of a felony, he became a second felony offender, and the sentence imposed was correct. (See *People*v. *Jarvis,*260 App. Div. 834.) Defendant’s application for a resentence is, in all respects, also denied.

Submit order.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-3273

___________________________

United States of America,

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee,

v.

Mikato Fulks,

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant.

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville

 ____________

Submitted: March 4, 2022

Filed: March 15, 2022 

[Unpublished]

____________

Before COLLOTON, SHEPHERD, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Mikato Fulks appeals after the district court1 revoked his supervised release

and sentenced him to 24 months in prison. His counsel has moved to withdraw, and

1The Honorable Timothy L. Brooks, United States District Judge for the

Western District of Arkansas.
has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), suggesting that the

district court erred in relying on a certified copy of a state court criminal judgment to

find that Fulks violated his conditions of release, and that the revocation sentence was

unreasonable.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district court did not

abuse its discretion by relying on a certified copy of the judgment for Fulks’s state

court controlled-substance conviction. See 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3); United States v.

Goodon, 742 F.3d 373, 375-76 (8th Cir. 2014). We also conclude that Fulks’s

sentence was not substantively unreasonable, as there is no indication that the court

overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant

factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing the relevant factors. See

United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 914 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review);

United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 922-23 (8th Cir. 2006). The sentence was

within the advisory sentencing guidelines range and below the statutory limit, see 18

U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). The district court also explained that it had considered the

factors under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Wohlman, 651 F.3d 878, 887

(8th Cir. 2011).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm.

______________________________

-2-
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 16

- 2228

_____________________________
R ENARD N EALIE W ILLIAMS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Cou rt for Escambia County

. Jennie M. Kinsey , Judge

. February 21, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

. B.L. T HOMAS , C.J.
, and L EWIS , and M AKAR , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla . R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee
, for Appellant ; Renard Nealie Williams, pro se, Appellant

.2 Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Trish a Meggs Pate, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.
**EXHIBIT      32.1**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|  | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange                Act of 1934; and |
|--|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                        |                                                      |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                        | /s/ Warren              G.              Lichtenstein |
|   | Warren                G. LichtensteinChairman,                  President, and Chief Executive  Officer(Principal                  Executive Officer)August                  14,                  2008 |

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 192 (Thursday, October 3, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80542]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22460]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration


Science Advisory Board

AGENCY:
     National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department 
of Commerce (DOC).

ACTION: Notice of public meeting cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is to notify the public that the meeting of the Science 
Advisory Board (SAB)is canceled in its entirety.

DATES: September 11, 2024 from 3:00 p.m.-5:00 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Casey Stewart, Executive Director, 
SSMC3, Room 11360, 1315 East-West Hwy., Silver Spring, MD 20910; Phone 
Number: 240-381-0833; Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#254b4a44440b56464c404b46404441534c564a575c474a445741654b4a44440b424a53"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="aec0c1cfcf80ddcdc7cbc0cdcbcfcad8c7ddc1dcd7ccc1cfdccaeec0c1cfcf80c9c1d8">[email protected]</span></a>; or 
visit the SAB website at https://sab.noaa.gov/current-meetings/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  The meeting was announced in the Federal 
Register on August 15, 2024, Volume 89, Number 158, page 66355.

David Holst,
Chief Financial Officer/Administrative Officer, Office of Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Research, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-22460 Filed 10-2-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-KD-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 July 17, 2007 (July 11, 2007)
 EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    001-33016
Commission
File Number
    
    68-0629883
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
 16701 Greenspoint Park Drive, Suite 200
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77060
(Zip Code)
 (281) 408-1200
    o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 1.01. Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement.
 EAC Acquisition
  Redman Acquisition
   Private Placement of Equity




---



##### 



Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (d) Exhibits.
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Document99.1
    
    Press Release dated July 11, 2007.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.By:
    Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.,its general partner By:
    Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC,its general partner Date: July 17, 2007
    By:
    /s/  Joseph A. MillsJoseph A. MillsChief Executive Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description of Document99.1
    
    Press Release dated July 11, 2007.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3200 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to transfer unobligated 

amounts previously made available to the Department of Veterans Affairs 

to the medical accounts of the Department to improve the furnishing 

of health care to veterans. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2015 

Ms. BROWN of Florida introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Veterans’ Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Appropriations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, 

in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to transfer 

unobligated amounts previously made available to the 

Department of Veterans Affairs to the medical accounts 

of the Department to improve the furnishing of health 

care to veterans. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. TRANSFER AUTHORITY TO IMPROVE HEALTH 

4 CARE FOR VETERANS. 

5 (a) TRANSFER.—The Secretary of Veterans Affairs 

6 may transfer any amounts made available to the Secretary 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3200 IH

1 before the date of the enactment of this Act that remain 

2 available for obligation to any covered medical account. 

3 Amounts so transferred shall be merged with and be avail4 able for the same purposes as the covered medical account 

5 to which transferred and shall be available for obligation 

6 or expenditure without fiscal year limitation. 

7 (b) EFFECT ON AUTHORIZATION AMOUNTS.—A 

8 transfer made to a covered medical account under the au9 thority of this section shall be deemed to increase the 

10 amount authorized for the covered medical account to 

11 which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to 

12 the amount transferred. 

13 (c) NOTICE TO CONGRESS.—The Secretary shall 

14 promptly notify the appropriate congressional committees 

15 of each transfer made under subsection (a). 

16 (d) CONSTRUCTION OF AUTHORITY.—The transfer 

17 authority provided under subsection (a) is in addition to 

18 any other transfer authority provided to the Secretary by 

19 law. 

20 (e) DEFINITIONS.—In this section: 

21 (1) The term ‘‘appropriate congressional com22 mittees’’ means— 

23 (A) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

24 and the Committee on Appropriations of the 

25 House of Representatives; and 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3200 IH

1 (B) the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

2 and the Committee on Appropriations of the 

3 Senate. 

4 (2) The term ‘‘covered medical accounts’’ 

5 means the following accounts of the Department of 

6 Veterans Affairs: 

7 (A) Veterans Health Administration, Med8 ical Services. 

9 (B) Veterans Health Administration, Med10 ical Support and Compliance. 

11 (C) Veterans Health Administration, Med12 ical Facilities. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### GREEN v. STATE.

No. 18443.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

Clark Wills, of Fort Worth, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for robbery; punishment assessed at ten years in the penitentiary.

The indictment properly charges the offense of robbery. The record before this court is without statement of facts or bills of exception. In such condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly represents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 23, 2007
    /s/ Don R. MadisonDon R. MadisonExecutive Vice President
Chief Financial and Administrative Officer 76
#### CAMPBELL v. STATE.

No. 18820.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 24, 1937.

Shropshire & Sanders, of Brady, for .appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area; penalty assessed at a fine of $100.

It is charged in the information that the appellant unlawfully sold whisky in Brown county, the said county “being then and there a dry area.” The mere averment in the information that the alleged offense took place in a dry area is not a sufficient compliance with the law. In the case of Kelly v. State, 98 S.W. (2d) 998, this court set out- the requisites of an information charging the sale of intoxicating liquor in a dry territory. See, also, Shaffer v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 99 S.W.(2d) 929; Scott v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 99 S.W.(2d) 920; Privitt v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 98 S.W.(2d) 204.

For the reason pointed out, the judgment is reversed and the prosecution ordered dismissed.
##### 



Exhibit 3.3
 CERTIFICATE OF FORMATION
OF
RESOLUTE ENERGY GP, LLC
  Name.
  Registered Office; Registered Agent.
 
  
  RESOLUTE HOLDINGS SUB, LLC, ManagerBy:
    /s/ James M. PicconeJames M. Piccone, PresidentAuthorized Person