alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32d

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code

I,
Thomas M. OFlynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Electric and Gas
Company, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of
Public Service Electric and Gas Company on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Electric
and Gas Company.

| |                                         
| | ----------------------------------------
| | /s/ Thomas
 M. OFlynn                  
| |                                         
| | Thomas M. OFlynn                       
| | Public
 Service Electric and Gas Company
| | Chief
 Financial Officer                
| | February 27,
 2008                      

---
Filed: June 20, 2000

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6444

(CA-99-103-5)

In Re: Vincent Eugene Lineberger,

Petitioner.

ORDER

The court amends its opinion filed June 6, 2000, as follows:

On the cover sheet, section 3 -- the district court number

is corrected to read “CA-00-103-5.”

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor

Clerk
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-6444

In Re: VINCENT EUGENE LINEBERGER,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-00-103-5)

Submitted: May 25, 2000 Decided: June 6, 2000

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Vincent Eugene Lineberger, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
3

PER CURIAM:

On March 31, 2000 Vincent E. Lineberger filed this petition

for writ of mandamus seeking an order directing the district court

to act on his petition for a writ of habeas corpus and his motions

for preliminary injunction and bond pending review which he filed

in February and March 2000. Because it has been less than six

months since Lineberger filed his action in the district court, we

find no undue delay. Thus, mandamus relief is not warranted. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the

petition for writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the Court and argument would not significantly

aid in the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the report of SURFACE COATINGS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form
10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities
and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  May
8, 2009





/s/
Rick Pietrykowski





Name:
Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer











Dated:  May
8, 2009





/s/
Rick Pietrykowski





Name:
Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
#### ADAMS v. STATE (two cases).

Nos. 16711, 16712.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Dec. 19, 1934.

F. W. Fischer, of Tyler, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for failing to measure oil; punishment, thirty days in the county jail and a fine of $500.

The trial term of the court below began on the 13th day of November, 1933, and ad*538journed on the 6th day of January, 1934. After conviction appellant seems to have made an appeal bond, which appears to have been filed on December 26, 1933, -during the term of the court below. This is contrary to the provisions of article 830, O. O. P., which specifically requires fhat an appeal be perfected by the giving of a recognizance, if appeal is perfected before the adjournment of the trial term. An appeal bond can only be resorted to; when an appeal is perfected, by the giving of such bond after adjournment of' the term.

Being without jurisdiction, the appeal is dismissed.
novn-ex101_6.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

 

October 31, 2017

 

 

 

William L. Hodges

401 May Court

Raleigh, North Carolina 27609

 

Dear Bill,

 

I am pleased to extend the terms of your employment with Novan, Inc. (the “Company”) as interim Chief Financial Officer until the earlier of March 20, 2018 (the “Extension Period”) or when a permanent CFO is hired.  This letter amends the terms of your employment, as described in the offer letter dated March 21, 2017 and further amended on June 28, 2017 and August 10, 2017 (the “Offer Letter”) during the Extension Period.

 

Except as otherwise described below, your compensation during the Extension Period will be governed by this paragraph.  Your base salary during the Extension Period will continue as described in the Offer Letter.  You will continue to be eligible to participate in employee benefits and paid time off in accordance with the Company’s current policies.

 

Please sign and date one (1) copy of this letter and return it to me by October 31, 2017.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

 

Regards,

 

 

 

/s/ G. Kelly Martin_______

G. Kelly Martin

Chief Executive Officer

 

 

 

I agree to the amended terms of employment described above, this 31 day of October, 2017.

 

 

/s/ William L. Hodges_____

William L. Hodges
Order filed, May 30, 2014.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-14-00284-CV

____________

ROBIN D. BAIWIR AND STACY L. BAIWIR, Appellant

V.

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC AND U.S. 

BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, Appellee

On Appeal from the 129th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2011-43636

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due May 12, 2014. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Cynthia Berry, the official court reporter, to file the record in this 

appeal within 30 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
#### KERR v. STATE.

No. 17485.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 17, 1935.

Roy E. Estes, of Granbury, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for unlawfully carrying a pistol; punishment being a fine of $109.

The case was tried before a jury. The sheriff testified that he arrested appellant on the public square in the city of Granbury in Hood count}', and took the pistol off his person. The arrest was on Sunday. Appellant told the officer at the time that he had borrowed the pistol from Mr. McGlothin; began crying, saying, “You have got me this time” ; and begged the sheriff not to put him in jail. On the trial appellant testified that he had borrowed the pistol to practice with on the rifle range at Fort Worth, and had stopped in Granbury to buy ammunition. The court instructed the jury to acquit appellant if *531they believed he was carrying the pistol to the rifle range for practice, and also told the jury appellant would have the right to stop in Granbury to purchase ammunition for the pistol.

Appellant’s proposition is that the jury finding is against the evidence. It is apparently against appellant’s' evidence. No one testified for the defense save appellant. The case turns squarely on a fact issue; there being no objection of any hind to the court’s instruction. The jury did not accept appellant’s explanation of the presence of the pistol. We have no way of determining whether this was because appellant made no such explanation when the pistol was found on him or whether they doubted appellant’s story about his purpose -to purchase ammunition in Granbury on Sunday.

The jury was not required to accept as true appellant’s unsupported story about the transaction. Hawkins v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 569, 270 S. W. 1025; Key v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 612, 270 S. W. 1027; Horak v. State, 100 Tex. Cr. R. 485, 273 S. W. 601; Parsons v. State, 102 Tex. Cr. R. 524, 278 S. W. 444; Lee v. State, 117 Tex. Cr. R. 231, 34 S.W.(2d) 890. Even if this court entertained some doubt regarding the conclusion reached by the jury, we would not be authorized to substitute that doubt for a positive finding of the jury which has support in the evidence. Finley v. State, 117 Tex. Cr. R. 34, 38 S.W.(2d) 328.

The judgment is affirmed.
##### 



Exhibit 99.1
 THE HOUSTON EXPLORATION COMPANY
    
    (LOGO)
 
 News Release
 Houston Exploration Special Meeting of Stockholders Scheduled for June 5, 2007
 Houston, Texas  April 30, 2007 
   Additional Information and Where to Find It




---



##### 



About The Houston Exploration Company
   Contact:
    
    The Houston Exploration CompanyMelissa R. Aurelio713-830-6887maurelio@houstonexp.com
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7067 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID S. KUYKENDALL, Virginia Department of Corrections, District 12, Staunton, Virginia, Respondent - Appellee.

No. 97-7296 JOHN PAUL TURNER, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DAVID S. KUYKENDALL, Virginia Department of Corrections, District 12, Staunton, Virginia, Respondent - Appellee.Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-131-R)2 Submitted: November 20, 1997 Decided: December 10, 1997 Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John Paul Turner, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994) (current version at 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court's orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss theappeals on the reasoning of the district court. Turner v. Kuykendall , No. CA-96-131-R (W.D. Va., July 8, and Sept. 8, 1997). See Lindh v. Murphy , 521 U.S. ___, 1997 WL 338568 (U.S. June 23, 1997) (No. 96-6298). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
October 18, 2010

VIA EMAIL

Paul Gretch, Esq. Director, Office of International Aviation U.S. Department of Transportation Office of the Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Dormancy Notice of Centurion Air Cargo, Inc.: Miami – Mexico City,

Docket OST-2006-24671

Dear Mr. Gretch:

Due to changes in the market and econo mic condition, Centurion wishes to advise the Department that it no longer intends to ope rate scheduled service on this route. This authority was granted by Or der 06-12-18 (December 19, 2006) and the dormancy period began on June 28, 2010.

Accordingly, consistent with the dor mancy notice requirement set forth in condition 7 of Appendix A of Order 88-10- 2 as incorporated in Order 06-12-18, Centurion hereby respectfully provides noti ce of dormancy with re spect to the route

stated above.

Respectfully Submitted

Joanne W. Young Counsel for Centurion Air Cargo

cc: Docket OST-2005-21709

Ms. Linda Lundell

Attached Service ListCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that, on October 18, 2010 I caused to be served a copy of the Application of Centurion Air Cargo, Inc. for renewal of an exemption upon those persons listed below by email:

carl.nelson@aa.com John.Allen@faa.gov howard_kass@usairways.com byerlyjr@state.gov rbkeiner@crowell.com dwight.moore@ustranscom.mil

hershel.kamen@coair.com

dan.weiss@coair.com nssparks@fedex.com lachter@starpower.net

sametta.c.barnett@delta.com

msinick@ssd.com mlbenge@zsrlaw.com tom.fosko@airtransport.cc jeffrey.manley@united.com kevin.montgomery@polaraircargo.com

sascha.vanderbellen@delta.com dvaughan@kelleydrye.com rpommer@atlasair.com

mroller@rollerbauer.com daniel.commins@evergreenaviation.com ben.graves@evergreenairlines.com rsilverberg@sgbdc.com jrichardson@johnlrichardson.com efaberman@wileyrein.com probinet@arrowcargo.com pmurphy@lopmurphy.com

____________________________________ David M. Kirstein
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

MAICKEL SAMIR BEDIR, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D22-2465

LT Case No. 2022-CF-001314-AX

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

___________________________/

Decision filed May 2, 2023

Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Lake County,

James R. Baxley, Judge.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, 

and Nancy Ryan, Assistant Public

Defender, Daytona Beach, for 

Appellant. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Robin A. Compton, 

Assistant Attorney General, 

Daytona Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

WALLIS, SOUD and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)


OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Consolidation Services,
Inc. (the “Company”) for the three month period ended March 31, 2009, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, John C. Francis, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(a)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and




(b)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.






Dated:
May 12, 2009


CONSOLIDATION
SERVICES, INC.






By: 
/s/ John C. Francis


John C.
Francis


Chief
Financial Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Consolidation Services, Inc. and will be
retained by Consolidation Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE         

No 27/2006

of 10 March 2006         

amending Annex II (Technical regulations, standards, testing and certification) to the EEA Agreement

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

The following shall be added in point 12s (Commission Regulation (EC) No 2032/2003) of Chapter XV of Annex II to the Agreement:

                  ‘, as amended by:

Article 2

The texts of Regulation (EC) No 1048/2005 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 11 March 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 53, 23.2.2006, p. 40.

(2)OJ L 178, 9.7.2005, p. 1.

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent  public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation
of  our  reports  included   in  this  Form  11-K,  into  Portland  General
Corporation's previously filed  Registration Statement No. 33-27462 on Form
S-8,  Registration  Statement  No.  33-40943   on  Form  S-8,  Registration
Statement No. 33-49811 on Form S-8, Registration  Statement No. 33-55321 on
Form S-3 and Registration Statement No. 33-61313 on Form S-8.

                                              ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP

Portland, Oregon,
June 25, 1997
nvro-ex102_310.htm



[***] Certain information in this document has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions.

 

Exhibit 10.2

Amendment No. 1 to Manufacturing and Supply Agreement

Amendment No. 1 to the Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, dated 30th September 2017 (the “Amendment”) between Nevro Corp. (“Nevro”) and Vention Medical Design and Development, Inc. (“Vention”).

WHEREAS, Nevro and Vention have entered into a Manufacturing and Supply Agreement, dated December 8th, 2015 (the “Existing Agreement”).

WHEREAS, Nevro and Vention desire to amend the Existing Agreement by amending and restating Appendix B on the terms set forth herein.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Nevro and Vention agree as follows:

Appendix B of the Existing Agreement shall be amended and restated in its entirety to reflect the current and proposed unit costs for the Model 2000 Unit. The proposed unit cost contained in the new Appendix B will become effective for units delivered beginning on October 1, 2017. Appendix B shall be restated as follows:

APPENDIX B

9/22/2017

Model Unit Costing – Current and Proposed Unit Cost

 


			
	
Model 2000 Pricing Summary

	
 
	
Current Unit Cost to Date
	
Proposed Unit Cost

	
Material
	
$[***]
	
$[***]

	
Labor
	
$[***]
	
$[***]

	
Assay Yield Factor
	
[***]%
	
[**]%

	
Total
	
$[***]
	
$[***]

	
 

	
 

Model 2000 Pricing - Material Detail

	
 
	
Current Unit Cost to Date
	
Proposed Unit Cost

	
Material Cost
	
$[***]
	
$[***]

	
MAC
	
[***]%
	
[***]%

	
Material Yield Factor
	
[***]%
	
[***]%

	
Total Material Cost
	
$[***]
	
$[***]

	
 

	
Model 2000 Pricing Labor Detail

	
 
	
Current Unit Cost to Date
	
Proposed Unit Cost

	
Direct Labor Hours
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
Indirect Labor
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
Total Hours
	
[***]
	
[***]

	
Total Cost
	
$[***]
	
$[***]




 



 

 

IN WITNESS HEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date first written above.

 


	
 
	
 
	
Vention Medical Design and Development, Inc.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Thomas Testa

	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
President

	
 
	
 
	
Printed Name:
	
Thomas Testa

	
 
	
 
	
Date:
	
9/20/2017

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Nevro Corp.

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Andrew Galligan

	
 
	
 
	
Title:
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Printed Name:
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
Date:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2936 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to treat infant formula 

as adulterated if its use-by date has passed. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 25, 2015 

Ms. MENG introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act to 

treat infant formula as adulterated if its use-by date 

has passed. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Infant Formula Pro5 tection Act of 2015’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXPIRED INFANT FORMULA. 

7 (a) ADULTERATION.—Section 412(a) of the Federal 

8 Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 350a(a)) is 

9 amended— 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2936 IH

1 (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ‘‘or’’ at the 

2 end; 

3 (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at 

4 the end and inserting ‘‘, or’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(4) such infant formula’s use-by date, as spec7 ified in the formula’s labeling in accordance with 

8 section 107.20 of title 21, Code of Federal Regula9 tions (or any successor regulations) has passed.’’. 

10 (b) APPLICABILITY.—The amendment made by sub11 section (a) applies beginning on the date that is 6 months 

12 after the date of enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report
of United Mines, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or
about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Glenn E. Martin, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec.
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           Information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  November
      16, 2009
            /s/
      Glenn E. MartinBy:  Glenn
      E. MartinIts:  President





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
United Mines, Inc. and will be retained by United Mines, Inc. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
|   | (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Jack L. Howard                                                                                                                                                                    |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Jack L. HowardChief Operating Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)July      24, 2009 |

----