alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
31.1








CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302


OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J.
Wade Mezey, certify that:





1. I have
reviewed this Form 10-Q for Mezey Howarth Racing Stables,
Inc.;





2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the periods covered by this report;





3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:





a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the small business issuer, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





c)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
issuer's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting;




and





5. The
small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small
business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):





a) All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b) Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.






Date: May
21, 2008





/s/ J.
Wade Mezey


--------------------------


J. Wade
Mezey


CEO
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

EottoPaitle John H. UlnterE Exeaatlve Director state Departmnt OS PubllC Welfare Attatln,

Texas Deal@ fur:

### Bonerablo JohnB. Ulntefa,

pge 3



### . iiewe 

### oSthm opittloa,

therefore,the&mrd oSCaa

### tro1 ia 

### correct

ln ita 

### po8ltlon

tbrt the skpRamnt's mqmJwtltatlve8 

### we u1thout c, ior BU G 10, to a-tar 

### oaths tar 8uah itwl8a8 

### truto "f 

### o thw m tte t r m tb r tdo no tr e~~~i~ owl 88lntewnw und
cant8 

### sor uwl8tuM6. 

### l lL@blUty& 

### app1%- m wtt0t, 0r ~0~86, **gc~ci~4** 

### defi~ **tha boundary**  **llae beWeea**  **the80 iield8**  **oi** duty **kcauae we**  **do not**  **hare she**  tacta **b6ioro Its.**  **St% the**  Depwtmant reprewattbtivw **should aluuym**  **be able**  **80 judge**  **whether the**  mdnita8trutlom of an oah or the taUng of un 

### l aknovledgaeat

form8 8 part OS tha mcarear~ **steps** ln e8tabliw the ellgibillty of an applioant. 

### VorJ truly**ymtr8** ATTl%t?iEX



### - OF !iZWd

Emdb
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 24.1


                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Mac Frugal's Bargains o Close-outs Inc.
Dominguez, California:

        We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
No. 33-43661 and Registration Statement No. 33-55130 of Mac Frugal's Bargains o
Close-outs Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated March 12, 1997, appearing in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mac Frugal's Bargains o Close-outs Inc. and
subsidiaries for the year ended February 2, 1997.



DELOITTE & TOUCHE

Los Angeles, California
May 2, 1997
*OPINION ISSUED MAY 14, 2009*

#### *272ROBERT GLADHILL VS. REGIONAL JAIL AND CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AUTHORITY

(CC-09-0093)

Claimant appeared *pro se.*

Ronald R. Brown, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

This claim was submitted for decision based upon the allegations in the Notice of Claim and respondent's Answer.

Claimant, a former inmate at the Eastern Regional Jail, seeks to recover $ 129.99 for a pair of “Rocky” boots and $55.00 plus tax for a Harley Davidson silk shirt. Claimant alleges that these items were not returned to him when he was discharged from the facility.

In its Answer, respondent admits the validity of the claim in the amount of $129.99. Respondent denies the amount of $55.00 plus tax for the shirt. According to the claimant’s property inventory sheet, two shirts were released to him. The Court is aware that respondent does not have a fiscal method for paying claims of this nature; therefore, the claim has been submitted to this Court for determination. Claimant has agreed to accept payment in the amount of $ 129.99.

This Court has taken the position in prior claims that if a bailment situation has been created, respondent is responsible for property of an inmate which is taken from that inmate, remains in its custody, and is not produced for return to the inmate.

Accordingly, the Court makes an award to the claimant herein in the amount of $129.99.

Award of $129.99.
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 79172]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22158]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

48 CFR Part 552

[GSAR-TA-2024-01; Docket No. GSA-GSAR-2024-0018; Sequence No. 1]


General Services Administration Acquisition Regulation; Technical 
Amendments

AGENCY: Office of Acquisition Policy, General Services Administration 
(GSA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The General Services Administration (GSA) is issuing this 
final rule to amend the General Services Administration Acquisition 
Regulation (GSAR) to make needed editorial changes.

DATES: Effective: September 27, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Thomas O'Linn, Procurement 
Analyst, at 202-445-0390 for clarification of content. For information 
pertaining to status or publication schedules, contact the Regulatory 
Secretariat Division at 202-501-4755 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e0a7b3a1b28587938583a0879381ce878f96"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="cb8c988a99aeacb8aea88bacb8aae5aca4bd">[email protected]</span></a>. Please cite 
GSAR-TA-2024-01.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This final rule amends the General Services 
Administration Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) to make needed technical 
amendments to update erroneous clause dates.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 552

    Government procurement.

Jeffrey A. Koses
Senior Procurement Executive, Office of Acquisition Policy, Office of 
Government-wide Policy, General Services Administration.

    Therefore, GSA amends 48 CFR part 552 as set forth below:

PART 552--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 552 continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  40 U.S.C. 121(c).


552.219-18  [Amended]

0
2. Amend section 552.219-18 by removing from the date of the clause 
``(DATE)'' and adding ``(MAY 2024)'' in its place.


552.238-115  [Amended]

0
3. Amend section 552.238-115 by removing from the date of the clause 
``(AUG 24)'' and adding ``(SEP 2024)'' in its place.


552.238-120  [Amended]

0
4. Amend section 552.238-120 by removing from the date of the clause 
``(AUG 24)'' and adding ``(SEP 2024)'' in its place.

[FR Doc. 2024-22158 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2863 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit unrecognized individuals 

from charging fees for legal services provided to veterans related to 

appeals before the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Board of 

Veterans’ Appeals, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 23, 2015 

Mr. ROONEY of Florida (for himself, Ms. BORDALLO, Mr. WALZ, Mr. BRADY

of Pennsylvania, and Mr. RIGELL) introduced the following bill; which 

was referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to prohibit unrecognized individuals from charging fees for legal services 

provided to veterans related to appeals before the Department of Veterans Affairs or the Board of Veterans’ 

Appeals, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Secure Legal Services 

5 for Veterans Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2863 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION OF UNRECOGNIZED INDIVIDUALS 

2 CHARGING FEES FOR LEGAL SERVICES PRO3 VIDED TO VETERANS RELATED TO APPEALS 

4 CLAIMS BEFORE THE DEPARTMENT OF VET5 ERANS AFFAIRS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 5904(a)(6) of title 38, 

7 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

8 following new subparagraph: 

9 ‘‘(F)(i) An individual who is not recognized as an 

10 agent or attorney under this section may not directly or 

11 indirectly solicit, contract for, charge, receive, or attempt 

12 to solicit, contract for, charge, or receive any fee or com13 pensation for services rendered in the preparation, presen14 tation, or prosecution of an appeal before the Department 

15 or the Board of Veterans’ Appeals. 

16 ‘‘(ii) Whoever violates this subparagraph shall be 

17 fined in accordance with title 18, imprisoned for not more 

18 than one year, or both. 

19 ‘‘(iii) There is established in the General Fund of the 

20 Treasury a fund to be known as the ‘TBI Research and 

21 Initiatives Fund’. Amounts collected for violations of this 

22 subparagraph shall be deposited in the fund and shall re23 main available to the Secretary without fiscal year limita24 tion for traumatic brain injury research and initiatives.’’. 

25 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

26 subsection (a) shall take effect on the date of the enactVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:04 Jun 27, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2863.IH H2863

rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 2863 IH

1 ment of this Act and apply with respect to an act that 

2 occurs on or after that date. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK6VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>
                                   Exhibit 21
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                  Percentage of    Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                                  Ownership       Incorporation
<S>                                               <C>            <C>
Canadian Des Moines Industries Ltd.                    100              Canada
Candraft Detailing Inc.                                100              Canada
Construcciones Pitt-Des Moines Venezuela, C.A.         100              Venezuela
General Steel Corporation                               90              Washington
Hammond Latino Americana, S.A.                         100              Panama
HyCon, Inc.                                            100              Alabama
Hydrostorage, Inc.                                     100              Tennessee
Maintenance Contractors Corp.                          100              Virgin Islands
Oregon Culvert Co., Inc.                               100              Oregon
PDM Argentina, SA                                      100              Argentina
PDM Bahamas Ltd.                                       100              Bahamas
PDM Bonaire, N.V.                                      100              Netherlands Antilles
PDM Bridge Corp.                                       100              Delaware
PDM Chile Limitada                                     100              Chile
PDM El Salvador, S.A. de C.V.                          100              El Salvador
PDM de Guatemala, S.A.                                 100              Guatemala
PDM International Ltd.                                 100              Delaware
PDM Latin America Ltd.                                 100              Georgia
PDM Ohio, Inc.                                         100              Ohio
PDM Peru S.A.C.                                        100              Peru
PDM Strocal, Inc.                                      100              Pennsylvania
PDM-TAI,S.A.                                           100              Venezuela
PDM Virgin Islands, Ltd.                               100              Virgin Islands
Pittsburgh-Des Moines Sdn. Bhd. (PDM Malaysia)         100              Malaysia
P.T. Perkasa Daya Megah (PDM Indonesia)                100              Indonesia
</TABLE>
---

|Exhibit 32.2                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Tecton Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the
capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

|Dated: June 14, 2007 | /s/ Bruno Weiss                     
|-------------------- | ------------------------------------
|                     | Bruno Weiss, Chief Financial Officer

---
* Pursua nt to 5 T H C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED

October 8, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-20374 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

CLIFFORD ROY TATUM,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas

(H-02-CR-241-2)

--------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Defendant-Appellant Clifford Roy Tatum appeals from his

guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to possess with int ent to

distribute more than 50 grams of a mixture containing cocaine base

and from his resulti ng sentence of 327 months’ imprisonment,

followed by five years’ supervised release. We denied Tatum’s

court-appointed counsel’s motion to withdraw and directed him to

brief whether Tatum’s waiver of his right to appeal or to

collaterally attack the plea, conviction, and sentence was knowing2

and voluntary; and whether the district court admonished Tatum

regarding the waiver provision as required by Federal Rule of

Criminal Procedure 11. No other issues are raised.

Tatum has not shown that any Rule 11 violation by the district

court amounted to plain error or that h is waiver was not knowing

and voluntary. S ee United States v. Dominguez Benitez

, 124 S. Ct.

2333 (2004); United States v. Portillo

, 18 F.3d 290 (5th Cir.

1994). We need not address at this time whether a particular issue

Tatum might attempt to raise in a post-conviction proceeding could

be the proper subject of waiver. See United States v. White , 307

F.3d 336, 343 (5th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Quarterly Report On Form 10-QSB of Jag Media Group, Inc. (the Company) for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, I, Dean Elliott, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



1. Such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2007, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: November 14, 2007



Jag Media Group, Inc.



By: /s/ Dean Elliott

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

ERIC HARRIS,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

State.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00045-CR

Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 2

of Bell County, Texas

(TC# MR2C1903597)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found Appellant Eric Harris guilty of resisting arrest, search, or transportation, and 

the trial court assessed punishment of 300 days’ incarceration. We affirm.1

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the 

appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967) by presenting a professional evaluation of the record 

demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 

403, 406 n.9 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008) (“In Texas, an Anders brief need not specifically advance 

‘arguable’ points of error if counsel finds none, but it must provide record references to the facts 

and procedural history and set out pertinent legal authorities.”). Counsel has notified the Court in 

1 This case was transferred from our sister court in Austin, and we decide it in accordance with the precedent of that

court to the extent required by TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
2

writing that he has delivered a copy of counsel’s brief and the motion to withdraw to Appellant, 

and he has advised Appellant of his rights to review the record, file a pro se brief, and seek 

discretionary review. Counsel has also explained to Appellant the process for obtaining the 

appellate record and provided this Court’s address and a motion for pro se access to the appellate 

record that lacks only Appellant’s signature. See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 318–20 

(Tex. Crim. App. 2014) (an attorney filing an Anders brief must “(1) notify his client of the motion 

to withdraw and the accompanying Anders brief, providing him a copy of each, (2) inform him of 

his right to file a pro se response and of his right to review the record preparatory to filing that 

response, and (3) inform him of his pro se right to seek discretionary review should the court of 

appeals declare his appeal frivolous. . . . [and] (4) take concrete measures to initiate and facilitate 

the process of actuating his client’s right to review the appellate record, if that is what his client 

wishes.”). Appellant has not filed a pro se brief in over two months since defense counsel filed a

brief and informed Appellant of his rights. See In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d at 409 n.23.

After carefully reviewing the record and counsel’s brief, we find nothing in the record that 

might arguably support the appeal. We conclude that the appeal is wholly frivolous and without 

merit. We grant appellate counsel’s motion to withdraw in accordance with Anders v. California

and affirm the trial court’s judgment supporting Appellant’s conviction.

LISA J. SOTO, Justice

Date June 29, 2023

Before Rodriguez, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.

(Do Not Publish)
CHIEF JUSTICE

 ROGELIO VALDEZ

JUSTICES

 NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ

 DORI CONTRERAS GARZA

 GINA M. BENAVIDES

 GREGORY T. PERKES

 NORA L. LONGORIA

CLERK

 DORIAN E. RAMIREZ

NUECES COUNTY COURTHOUSE

901 LEOPARD, 10TH FLOOR

CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 78401

361-888-0416 (TEL)

361-888-0794 (FAX)

HIDALGO COUNTY

ADMINISTRATION BLDG.

100 E. CANO, 5TH FLOOR

EDINBURG, TEXAS 78539

956-318-2405 (TEL)

956-318-2403 (FAX)

www.txcourts.gov/13thcoa

Court of Appeals 

Thirteenth District of Texas 

January 29, 2015

Hon. Arturo Guajardo Jr.

Hidalgo County Clerk

P. O. Box 58

Edinburg, TX 78540

* DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL *

Re: Cause No. 13-14-00327-CV

Tr.Ct.No. CL-14-1404-H

Style: Mike East, Alice East, Lisa East and Alejandro Urias v. Laura Salinas

The judgment of the trial court in the above cause was DISMISSED by this Court on the 

14th day of August, 2014. The mandate is enclosed.

Costs of the appeal were adjudged against appellants, Mike East, Alice East, Lisa East 

and Alejandro Urias. 

Pursuant to Section 51.204(b) of the Government Code, the attorneys of record are 

hereby notified that any exhibits submitted to the Court by a party may be withdrawn by that 

party or the party’s attorney of record within 30 days. Exhibits on file with the Court will be 

destroyed three (3) years after final disposition of the case or at an earlier date if ordered by the 

Court.

Very truly yours,

Dorian E. Ramirez, Clerk

DER:ch

Enc.

cc: Hon. Robert J. Salinas (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)

Hon. J. A. `Tony` Canales (DELIVERED VIA E-MAIL)