alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.1



 Exhibit 10.1 

AMENDED AND RESTATED 

SHAREHOLDERS AGREEMENT 

TERMINATION 
 This Amended
and Restated Shareholders Agreement Termination (the “Termination Agreement”) is entered into as of July 28, 2017 by and among Regional Management Corp., a Delaware corporation (the
“Corporation”) and the Shareholders whose signatures are set forth below (the “Remaining Shareholders”) in order to terminate that certain Amended and Restated Shareholders Agreement dated
March 27, 2012 by and among the Corporation, the Continuing Shareholders, Parallel and Palladium (the “Shareholders Agreement”). 

WHEREAS, the Remaining Shareholders and the Corporation mutually desire to terminate the Shareholders Agreement; 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the Corporation and the Remaining Shareholders hereby agree
as follows: 
  

	1.	Capitalized terms used in this Termination Agreement and not otherwise defined in this Termination Agreement have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Shareholders Agreement. 


 

	2.	The Corporation and the Remaining Shareholders hereby agree that the Corporation and the Shareholders listed on the signature page of this Termination Agreement are the sole remaining Parties to the Shareholders
Agreement. 

  

	3.	The Shareholders Agreement is hereby terminated by mutual agreement of the Corporation and the Remaining Shareholders as contemplated in Section 4.6 of the Shareholders Agreement, the Shareholders Agreement is of
no further force or effect and none of the parties hereto shall have any further obligations or liabilities thereunder. 

  

	4.	This Termination Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original and each of which may bear the signature(s) of one or more of the parties hereto but which together shall
constitute but a single instrument. A copy of this Termination Agreement bearing the facsimile, photostatic, PDF or other copy of the signature of a party hereto shall be as valid for all purposes as a copy of this Termination Agreement bearing that
party’s original signature. 

 Signatures on the following page. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporation and Remaining Shareholders have executed this
Termination Agreement as of the date first written above. 
  

			
	Regional Management Corp.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brian Fisher

	Name:	 	Brian Fisher
	Title:	 	VP and General Counsel


 


	
	/s/ R. A. Godley, Sr.
	Richard A. Godley, Sr.

 


	
	/s/ Brenda F. Kinlaw
	Brenda F. Kinlaw

 
 


 


	
	/s/ Pamela Denise Godley
	Pamela Denise Godley as Trustee
	of the Pamela Denise Godley Revocable
	Trust dated December 17, 2012


 




	
	   

	C. Glynn Quattlebaum

 
 


 


	
	/s/ Pamela Denise Godley
	Pamela Denise Godley as Trustee
	of the Haylei D. Tucker Family 2012
	Irrevocable Trust dated December 17, 2012

 


	
	   

	Sherri Quattlebaum

 
 


 


			
	U.S. Trust Company of Delaware as
	Trustee of the Tyler Godley 2011 
	Irrevocable Trust dated March 28, 2011
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Cody A. Snyder

	Name:	 	Cody A. Snyder
	Title:	 	Vice President

 


	
	 /s/ Jesse W. Geddings

	Jesse W. Geddings
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 183 (Friday, September 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 77164]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21502]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: October 28, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G54, 
Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Hitendra S. Chand, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G54, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 627-3245, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#7a12130e1f145419121b141e3a141312541d150c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="bfd7d6cbdad191dcd7ded1dbffd1d6d791d8d0c9">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 16, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-21502 Filed 9-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# Official Journal C 346/2023

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 346 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6629 September 2023 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 346

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6629 September 2023

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2023/C 346/01 | Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – supplement A 2023/4 (
  1
  ) | 1 |
| 2023/C 346/02 | Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species – supplement H 2023/4 (
  1
  ) | 171 |

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2023/C 346/01

Common catalogue of varieties of agricultural plant species – supplement A 2023/4 (
  1
  )

1

1

2023/C 346/02

Common catalogue of varieties of vegetable species – supplement H 2023/4 (
  1
  )

1

171

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
<PAGE>
 
                                  Exhibit 21
                          SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY
                             Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.
                               December 31, 1995

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                          Percentage of   Jurisdiction of
Name of Subsidiary                          Ownership     Incorporation    
<S>                                       <C>             <C>        

Canadian Des Moines Industries Ltd.            100         Canada  
Construcciones Pitt-Des Moines Venezuela,
  C.A.                                         100         Venezuela    
Hammond Latino Americana, S.A.                 100         Panama  
HyCon, Inc.                                     81         Alabama 
Hydrostorage, Inc.                             100         Tennessee    
Oregon Culvert Co., Inc.                        81         Oregon  
  d/b/a Washington Culvert Co. 
PDM Argentina, SA                              100         Argentina    
PDM Australia Pty. Ltd.                        100         Australia    
PDM Bonaire, N.V.                              100         Bonaire 
PDM Bridge Corporation                         100         Delaware     
PDM Chile Limitada                             100         Chile
PDM El Salvador, S.A. de C.V.                  100         El Salvador
PDM International Ltd.                         100         Delaware     
PDM Latin America Ltd.                         100         Georgia 
PDM Ohio, Inc.                                 100         Ohio        
PDM Services A.G.                              100         Liechtenstein
PDM Strocal, Inc.                              100         Pennsylvania
PDM Virgin Islands, Ltd.                       100         Virgin Islands
Pittsburgh-Des Moines Sdn. Bhd.
  (PDM Malaysia)                               100         Malaysia     
P.T. Perkasa Daya Megah
  (PDM Indonesia) (1)                          100         Indonesia    
 
</TABLE>


  NOTES OF EXPLANATION

  (1) Managed by PDM Services A.G.
Exhibit 32








CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of  Southern Bella, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.




Date:  May 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Viola HeitzViola Heitz, President,Chief Executive Officer,
Principal Financial Officer,

Principal Accounting Officer and

Director
Exhibit 21




                                 SUBSIDIARIES



                                                              PERCENTAGE OF   
                                                            VOTING STOCK OWNED
                                   PLACE OF                BY PORTEC, INC. AND
      NAME                       INCORPORATION                 SUBSIDIARIES 


Active (1)

   PORTEC Ltd.                   Canada                           100%
   PORTEC (U.K.) Ltd.            United Kingdom                   100% (2)
   PORTEC Overseas, Inc.         Delaware                         100%
   PORTEC International,         U.S. Virgin Islands              100%
    Inc.
   Kolberg Manufacturing         Delaware                         100%
    Corporation
   PORTEC B.V.                   Netherlands                      100%
   RPLeasing, Inc.               Delaware                         100%
   PORTEC Railway                Delaware                         100%
    Products, Inc.

                                       
1. This list does not include non-operating subsidiaries,
   maintained for the purpose of name protection only.

2. This percentage does not include directors' qualifying shares.
## FROM SOLVENTS TO AQUEOUS



## CLEANING LESSONS LEARNED ASTRO PAK CORPORATION DOWNEY, CA PRECISION CLEANING

FACILITY

## HISTORY

• Astro Pak founded in 1959 • Main customer base was aerospace industry • Aerospace still a significant portion of business despite diversification • Customer specifications limit ability to choose cleaning procedures & cleaning agents

## Decision to go green

• In 1990’s Astro Pak owner / president Ken Verheyen saw that restrictions on solvent use & availability were going to continue • Ken had a vision of Astro Pak as the industry leader, wants Astro Pak to set the green standard • Easier to switch once than make a series of small moves to stay ahead of changing solvent regulations

### Decision to go green

(continued)

• Ken came to the realization that even though up -front costs would be considerable, it was smart long-term business to switch to aqueous due to lower chemical costs which would lead to savings in the long run. • The risk of property damage through soil and or groundwater contamination along with human health risks due to emissions have made the long term risks of solvent use prohibitive. With solvent cleaning there are technician - level employees using chemicals that if improperly handled could potentially cost millions to remediate. The risks are unacceptable from both a moral and financial perspective.

## Making the change

• Astro Pak engaged Dr. Katy Wolf at IRTA for assistance and guidance • A series of tests of various type of hardware against typical and problem contaminants guided selection of aqueous cleaner • Initial investment considerable – large, three tank ultrasonic cleaning system, drying oven, and upgraded deionized water system

## Experience and lessons learned

• Aqueous cleaning has a learning curve – technique is more critical than with vapor degreasing • Equipment selection critical • Rinse techniques critical • Water quality critical • Process cycle longer but changes in batch size and process flow can increase capacity

### Experience and lessons learned

(continued)

• With careful technique, post - cleaning contaminant levels are lower with aqueous cleaning than with solvents • A/20 levels achieved (50 mcg per square cm) • Lower ongoing costs with aqueous cleaning enhances profitability • Technique, equipment, and experience are critical to successfully switch to aqueous cleaning!
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000079732
<NAME> POTOMAC ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
<SUBSIDIARY>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> PEPCO HOLDINGS, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    4,502,400
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         824,800
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                       819,200<F1>
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 764,200
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               6,910,600
<COMMON>                                       118,500
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                    1,012,500
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            779,300
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,910,300
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           50,000
<PREFERRED>                                     50,000
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         2,712,500
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                 199,500
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                  147,500
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    154,500
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                20,800
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,665,500<F2>
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                6,910,600
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    2,476,000
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                           114,500
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,909,900<F3>
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   2,024,400
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        451,600
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                                   0
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 451,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       204,500
<NET-INCOME>                                   247,100
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      8,900<F4>
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  238,200
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       196,600
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                      205,400<F5>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         440,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $2.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $1.98
<FN>
<F1>Includes $411,700 for Regulatory Assets and $407,500 for Other Deferred
Charges.
<F2>Includes manditorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust.
<F3>Includes Loss from Equity Investments of $9,600.
<F4>Includes preferred stock redemption expenses of $1,000.
<F5>Total annualized interest costs for all long-term debt and manditorily
redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust outstanding at December 31,
1999.
</FN>


</TABLE>
hsdt-ex101_6.htm



Exhibit 10.1

ASSET PURCHASE AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT N°1

 

 

 

BETWEEN THE UNDERSIGNED: 

 

NeuroHabilitation Corporation, a Delaware corporation, having its registered address at 642 Newtown Yardley Road Suite 100, Newtown, PA 18940(formerly located at 41 University Drive, Suite 400, Newtown, PA 18940) (hereinafter referred to as "NHC").

and

A&B(HK) Company Limited, a company existing under the laws of Hong Kong, having its registered address at Unit 2106,21/F Island Place Tower No.510 King’s Rd North Point, Hong Kong (hereinafter referred to as "A&B"). 

 

NHC and A&B are individually referred to herein as "Party" and collectively as "Parties". 

 

 

WHEREAS

 

 


	
 
	
1/
	
The Parties have entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (hereinafter the "Agreement")  on 9 October, 2015 upon which A&B purchase and NHC sell certain assets of NHC under the terms and conditions of the Agreement.





	
 
	
2/
	
The US Army has agreed to change the commercialization commitment from 31 December, 2017 to 31 December 2021, and NHC intends to amend the Agreement to be consistent with such change.





	
 
	
3/
	
As a consequence, the Parties wish to enter into this amendment N° 1 in order to reflect the abovementioned modification (hereinafter the "Amendment"). 




 

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties have agreed as follows:

 

ARTICLE 1. MODIFICATION OF ARTICLE 7(f) – Representations and Warranties of NHC

 

The Parties agree that Article 7(f) of the Agreement shall be amended as follows:

1

 



Exhibit 10.1

“  (f) NHC covenants that, as of the Effective Date, NHC shall obtain any additional, required FDA approval or clearance or to satisfy any outstanding regulatory requirement due from the sponsor  and commercially marketed the regulated technology to the point where the US Government may purchase the technology prior to 31 December 2021, unless NHC obtains the exemption of this obligation from US Army Medical Material Agency (“USAMMA”) and US Army Medical Material Agency (“USAMMDA”) under the “Cooperative Research and Development Agreement” between NHC and USAMMA  and USAMMDA. Both Parties agree, NHC’s breach of this Section will cause a devastating losses of A&B, and agrees to pay A&B a contract penalty of two (2) million US dollars in the event of breaching this Section, without prejudice to any other remedies A&B may be entitled under the applicable laws or this Agreement. ”

 

ARTICLE 2.  ENTRY INTO FORCE

 

The Parties agree that the Amendment shall enter into force on 30 October 2017.

All other provisions of the Agreement not specifically amended shall remain in full force and effect.

 

Executed in 2 (two) originals,

Date : October 30, 2017

 

 


		
	
For and on behalf of

A&B

 

Name: Lam Kong

Position: Director

Signature: /s/ Lam Kong

 

 

 
	
For and on behalf of

NHC

 

Name: Philippe Deschamps

Position: President and CEO

Signature: /s/ Philippe Deschamps




 

2
Opinion issued June 8, 2023

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-22-00887-CV

———————————

JAMES J. LUDWICK, Appellant

V.

HANH-THI BICH NGUYEN, Appellee

On Appeal from the 328th District Court

Fort Bend County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. 21-DCV-282033

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant, James J. Ludwick, has neither established indigence, nor paid or 

made arrangements to pay the fee for preparing the clerk’s record. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 20.1 (listing requirements for establishing indigence); 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal 

of appeal if no clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault); see also TEX. GOV’T 
2

CODE ANN. §§ 51.207, 51.208, 51.941(a), 101.041; Order Regarding Fees Charged 

in the Supreme Court, in Civil Cases in the Courts of Appeals, and Before the 

Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation, Misc. Docket No. 15-9158. Appellant 

failed to respond to our notice of March 6, 2023, concerning the failure to pay for 

the clerk’s record. In that notice, the Court advised appellant that failure to pay the 

fee for the clerk’s record could result in dismissal of this appeal. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 5 (allowing enforcement of rule), 37.3(b) (allowing dismissal of appeal if no 

clerk’s record filed due to appellant’s fault), 42.3(c) (allowing involuntary dismissal 

of case). 

We dismiss the appeal. We dismiss any pending motions as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Kelly, Hightower, and Countiss.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**










**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of SP Acquisition Holdings, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Warren G. Lichtenstein, Chairman, President and Chief Executive
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to
      my


knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                Jack L. Howard
              Jack
                L. Howard
              Chief
                Operating Officer and Secretary
              (Principal
                Accounting and Principal FinancialOfficer)
              November
                16, 2007
#### ALEJANDRO v. STATE.

No. 18408.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 10, 1936.

Tom J. Newton, Jr., of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for theft, punishment being assessed at a fine of $10 and confinement in jail for ten days.

*408It was charged that appellant stole an automobile of the value of $25 from Josefa Campa. Appellant waived trial by jury and after hearing evidence the judge found appellant guilty and assessed his punishment as heretofore indicated. No statement of facts proven upon the trial is brought forward and no bills of exception are found in the record. In this condition nothing is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.