alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1997
<CASH>                                          13,480
<SECURITIES>                                 2,219,795
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                           1,028
<DEPRECIATION>                                   (424)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,558,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,317
<BONDS>                                         50,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           326
<OTHER-SE>                                     502,328
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,558,341
<SALES>                                         23,631
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               247,704
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               157,146
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,850
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 90,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                    29,266
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             61,292
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    61,292
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.87
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.87


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Systematic Momentum FuturesAccess LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Justin C. Ferri,Chief Executive Officer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch AlternativeInvestments LLC, the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: | November 12, 2009 |   |
|-------|------------------------|--------|

 
| By                                              | /s/JUSTIN  C. FERRI |   |
|-------------------------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
| Justin  C. Ferri                                |                |
| Chief Executive  Officer, President and Manager |                |
| **(Principal Executive Officer)**               | ** **          |

 

----
#### CITY OF CORPUS CHRISTI v. JOHNSON.

No. 8926.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

Nov. 23, 1932.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 4, 1933.

See, also, 52 S.W.(2d) 281.

John S. McCampbell, Kleberg & Eckhardt, and T. S. Cyrus, all of Corpus Christi, for appellant.

Sidney P. Chandler, of Corpus Christi, for appellee.

FLY, O. J.

This suit originated in the justice’s court where appfellee sued appellant for $150, the value' of a horse alleged to have received an injury resulting in death,' through the negligence of appellant in having a defective fence about its pound in which it had confined the horse. A jury returned a verdict for the sum of $142.50 in favor of appellee, in the county court, to which the case had been appealed from a judgment for $150. The cause was *642submitted on six special issues, the jury finding that the horse had been cut on the left hind leg under the knee while in the city pound, and died from the injury received in the pound, that the pound was not a safe place in which to confine the horse, and that the failure to provide a safe place was negligence, and that such negligence was the proximate cause of the injury.

Harry Lawrence, who, in spite of his real English name, is described as a Mexican boy and a son of Mrs. Lawrence, the “pound mistress,” testified that he impounded the injured horse with others, and that he was lame in a hind leg when he placed him in the pound. The only testimony to contradict the testimony of Lawrence Elders, Mrs. Lawrence, and Harry, to the effect that the horse was lame when put in the pound; was testimony by Johnson to the effect that Harry told him, when he went after his horses; “Maybe so they break out, maybe so I put them back, maybe so they break out again, maybe so I put them back again.” Appellee and another witness swore that the pen was not as strong as it should have been, and that it hkd been patched in probably more than one place. Mrs. Lawrence stated that some time before the injured horse was placed in the pound the fence had been broken and mended with new lumber. The horse was put in the pound at night and appellee went there next morning. If the horse broke out, it must have been in the night, and he would not have been in the pen next morning. “Maybe so, he did not break out.” The evidence was utterly insufficient *to*show *that*the horse was hurt in the pen; the only evidence to show negligence of any kind being the “maybe sos” of the boy Harry Lawrence. There is an utter lack of testimony to establish negligence upon the part of appellant.

The case has evidently been fully explored and evidence exhausted, and the judgment will be reversed and judgment here rendered that appellee take nothing by this suit and pay all costs expended in the several courts in which it has appeared.

Reversed and rendered.
#### RAKE v. SECURITY LOAN & INVESTMENT CO.

No. 2745.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

May 30, 1935.

Rehearing Denied June 12, 1935.

G. C. Bradfield, of Beaumont, for appellant.

White & Baker, of Port Arthur, for ap-pellee.

*689O’QUINN, Justice.

The Security Loan & Investment Company, a Texas corporation, brought this suit in the county court at law of Jefferson county against appellant, Ed Rake, to recover on a promissory note, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage on an automobile given to secure the payment of the note. Appellee alleged that the note was originally for the sum of $770, upon which payments had been made reducing the amount due to $297.85, with interest and attorney’s fees.

Appellant, defendant below, answered admitting the execution of the note on June 20, 1930, same to be paid in monthly installments; that he paid the installments as they matured until about April 23, 1931; that on about said date he delivered to plaintiff company 92 shares of stock in said Security Loan & Investment Company which were worth $5 per share, which he owned, as a pledge or security for the payment of the note, and which said shares of stock were to be retained by said company and sold at cost of same, to be applied, when so sold, as a credit on the note; that thereafter he delivered to said company 76 shares of stock of the Houston Agricultural Credit Corporation, as. additional security for the payment of his noté, which said stock was worth $5 per share; that 32 of said shares were re7 turned to him, and that he was the owner of a half interest in the remaining 44 shares, which interest was of the value of $110; that he was entitled to a credit for the 92 shares in the sum of $460 and for the 22 shares of $110, which if credited on the note would overpay same by some $200; and by cross-action sought to recover in the sum of $200. The case was tried to a jury upon special issues, and judgment rendered for appellee for $367.-35, being for the balance due on the note,interest, and attorney’s fee, and also for foreclosure of the chattel mortgage on the automobile. This appeal is from that judgment.

On the trial below, the contested and controlling question was whether the 92 shares of stock in the plaintiff corporation were received by the president of the corporation from defendant Rake with the understanding and agreement that said stock was to be sold at cost ($5 per share) and the proceeds to be credited on the note. This question was correctly submitted to the jury, and they found against appellant. This finding has ample support in the record, and determines the case.

The judgment should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.
#### AGUILAR v. STATE.

No. 19846.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1938.

T. B. Monroe, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

Conviction for a misdemeanor; punishment being assessed at a fine of $100.

The record is before us without a statement of facts of bills of exception. No question is presented for review.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
#### GAINER v. BALCAR.

No. 3597.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Jan. 11, 1940.

B. L. Collins, of Lufkin, for appellant.

C. W. Wiedemann, of Beaumont, for ap-pellee.

WALKER, Chief Justice.

This suit was filed in the County Court of Jefferson County at Law, Jefferson County, Texas, by appellee, F. L. Balear, against appellant, W. O. Gainer, on a promissory note in the sum of $274.16, on the allegations of the petition, executed by appellant and payable to appellee at the First National Bank of Beaumont, Texas. Appellant filed his plea of privilege to be sued in Angelina County, Texas. By his controverting affidavit, appellee attempted to sustain his venue in Jefferson County on the ground that the note was payable in Jefferson County. In support of his controverting affidavit, he offered in evidence only the note sued upon, which was received over appellant’s exception, that, as against his plea of privilege, no predicate was laid for the introduction of the note, “there being no proof in the record, establishing the execution and delivery of the note by defendant to plaintiff.”

The court erred in receiving the note in evidence over appellant’s objection. The plea of privilege constituted a plea of non est factum, and required appellee to show that appellant in fact executed the note. The mere introduction of the note in evidence with appellant’s name signed thereto did not raise the issue of its execution by him, as against the plea of privilege. Chambers v. First National Bank of Hemphill, Tex.Civ.App., 104 S.W.2d 58. See note on this point, A. H. Belo Corporation v. Blanton, Tex.Sup., 129 S.W.2d 619; 18 Texas Law Review, page 111.

It follows that the judgment of the lower court must be reversed and the cause remanded for a new trial, and it is accordingly so ordered.

Reversed and remanded.
EXHIBIT 21


                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


     PEM International, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM International (Singapore) Pte Ltd., incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM Management, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware,
is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM Investments, Inc., incorporated under the laws of the State of
Delaware, is 100% owned by the Registrant.

     PEM World Sales, Ltd., incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, is 100%
owned by the Registrant.


<PAGE>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79300]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22141]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center For Scientific Review; Amended Notice of Meeting

    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Biological 
Chemistry and Macromolecular Biophysics Integrated Review Group, 
Macromolecular Structure and Function B Study Section, October 22, 
2024, 08:30 a.m. to October 23, 2024, 08:00 p.m., National Institutes 
of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD, 20892 
which was published in the Federal Register on September 23, 2024, FR 
Doc. No. 2024-21617, 89 FR 77533.
    This meeting is being amended to change the start time of the 
meeting from 8:30 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. The meeting is closed to the 
public.

    Dated: September 23, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-22141 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### JONES v. STATE.

No. 19576.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 30, 1938.

Ramey A. Smith, of Sulphur Springs, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding judge.

The conviction is for the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale in a dry area; penalty assessed at a fine of $150 and. confinement in the county jail for ninety days.

The complaint and information appear regular. The evidence adduced upon the trial is not brought forward for review. No complaints of the procedure have been presented by bills of exception.

No error having been perceived justifying a reversal of the conviction, the judgment is affirmed.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3021 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to allow the use of aerial survey data 

for certain applications, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 10, 2015 

Mr. POMPEO (for himself, Mr. MULLIN, Mr. SCHRADER, and Mr. MEEKS) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to allow the use of aerial 

survey data for certain applications, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Aerial Infrastructure 

5 Route Survey Act of 2015’’ or the ‘‘AIR Survey Act of 

6 2015’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3021 IH

1 SEC. 2. AERIAL SURVEY DATA ALLOWED FOR CERTAIN AP2 PLICATIONS. 

3 Section 7 of the Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717f) 

4 is amended by adding at the end the following new sub5 section: 

6 ‘‘(i) AERIAL SURVEY DATA.— 

7 ‘‘(1) DATA COLLECTED BY AERIAL SURVEY.— 

8 Data collected by aerial survey shall be accepted in 

9 lieu of, and given equal weight to, ground survey 

10 data for the purposes of— 

11 ‘‘(A) completing any prefiling process es12 tablished to facilitate the formal application 

13 process for obtaining a certificate of public con14 venience and necessity under this section; or 

15 ‘‘(B) completing an application associated 

16 with a Federal authorization (as defined in sec17 tion 15(a) with respect to an application for a 

18 certificate of public convenience and necessity 

19 under this section). 

20 ‘‘(2) VERIFICATION.—An agency accepting aer21 ial survey data pursuant to paragraph (1)(B) may 

22 require, as a condition of approval of an application 

23 associated with a Federal authorization described in 

24 such paragraph, that such aerial survey data be 

25 verified through the use of ground survey data beVerDate Sep 11 2014 07:18 Jul 14, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H3021.IH H3021

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3021 IH

1 fore the construction or extension of a facility that 

2 is the subject of such application.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                         Washington, D. C. 20549

                                 FORM 10-K

              Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998     Commission File Number 1-5447

                    PITTSBURGH & WEST VIRGINIA RAILROAD               
           (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

      Pennsylvania                                  25-6002536                  
(State of organization)                  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

#2 Port Amherst Drive, Charleston, WV                              25306-6699   
 (Address of principal executive offices)                          (Zip Code)


        Registrant's telephone number, including area code (304) 926-1124

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

                                                        Name of each exchange
     Title of each class                                 on which registered

Shares of beneficial interest,                         American Stock Exchange
     without par value

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:   None


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days:

Yes     X                                  No         

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of
the registrant as of March 2, 1999, was $12,036,800.

At March 2, 1999, there were 1,510,000 outstanding shares of beneficial
interest.

                                                                         
Notices and communications from the Securities and Exchange Commission
for the registrant may be sent to Robert A. Hamstead, Vice President
and Secretary-Treasurer, #2 Port Amherst Drive, Charleston, WV 25306.
Exhibit 35.2

[First Republic Bank Logo]

Feb 29, 2016

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-3 (see Schedule A)

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of First Republic Bank (the Servicer), does hereby certify that:



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 and of its performance under the Agreement (as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the above
referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement in all material respects throughout such reporting period.
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName:

Lionel AntunesTitle:

Vice President of Residential LendingDate:

Feb. 29, 2016




---

<for SEMT 2012-3>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by the Reconstitution Agreement dated June 27, 2012 (the
Agreement).
| | -- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EX-35.3
(logo) WELLS FARGO

Commercial Mortgage Servicing
D1086-120, 12th Floor
550 South Tryon Street
Charlotte, NC 28202
1-800-326-1334

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

Reference is hereby made to that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement
dated as of June 1, 2012, by and among J.P. Morgan Chase Commercial Mortgage
Securities Corp., as Depositor, Wells Fargo Bank, National  Association,
as Master Servicer and Certificate Administrator, Midland Loan
Services, a division of PNC Bank , National Association, as Special Servicer,
Trimont Real Estate Advisors, Inc., as Senior Trust Advisor and U.S. Bank
National Association, as Trustee, with respect to Commercial Mortgage Pass-
Through Certificates JPMC 2012-CIBX (the "Agreement"). Capitalized terms used
herein not otherwise defined shall have the meanings assigned in the Agreement.

Pursuant to Section 11.09 of this Agreement, I, Daniel Bober, Executive Vice
President of Commercial Mortgage Services do hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the period from
   January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 (the "Reporting Period"), and of
   its performance per the Agreement during such period has been made under my
   supervision, and

2. To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master Servicer, has
   fulfilled all of its obligations under the Agreement in all material
   respects throughout the Reporting Period.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate as of the 13th
day of March 2014.


/s/ Daniel Bober
Daniel Bober
Executive Vice President
Wells Fargo Bank

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

(logo) Together we'll go far