alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
V 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3230 

For the relief of Erdal Dede. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 27, 2015 

Mr. RYAN of Ohio introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Erdal Dede. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR ERDAL 

4 DEDE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act, Erdal Dede shall be eligible for issuance of an immi8 grant visa or for adjustment of status to that of an alien 

9 lawfully admitted for permanent residence upon filing an 

10 application for issuance of an immigrant visa under sec11 tion 204 of such Act or for adjustment of status to lawful 

12 permanent resident. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3230 IH

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Erdal Dede enters 

2 the United States before the filing deadline specified in 

3 subsection (c), he shall be considered to have entered and 

4 remained lawfully and shall, if otherwise eligible, be eligi5 ble for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Im6 migration and Nationality Act as of the date of the enact7 ment of this Act. 

8 (c) DEADLINE FOR APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF

9 FEES.—Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the ap10 plication for issuance of an immigrant visa or the applica11 tion for adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees 

12 within 2 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

13 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBER.— 

14 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res15 idence to Erdal Dede, the Secretary of State shall instruct 

16 the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current or 

17 next following fiscal year, the total number of immigrant 

18 visas that are made available to natives of the country of 

19 the alien’s birth under section 203(a) of the Immigration 

20 and Nationality Act or, if applicable, the total number of 

21 immigrant visas that are made available to natives of the 

22 country of the alien’s birth under section 202(e) of such 

23 Act. 

24 (e) DENIAL OF PREFERENTIAL IMMIGRATION

25 TREATMENT FOR CERTAIN RELATIVES.—The natural 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3230 IH

1 parents, brothers, and sisters of Erdal Dede shall not, by 

2 virtue of such relationship, be accorded any right, privi3 lege, or status under the Immigration and Nationality Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### WEBB v. STATE.

No. 14151.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 4, 1931.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for driving an automobile while intoxicated, punishment being confinement in the county jail for ten days.

The record is before us without any statement of facts or bills of exception. The indictment is regular and nothing is presented to this court for review.

The judgment is affirmed.
11 TH COURT OF APPEALS

EASTLAND

, TEXAS

JUDGMENT

In the interest of G.L.O., a child

, * From the 266th District

Court of Erath County,

Trial Court No. CV31368.

No. 11

- 13

- 00211

- CV * January 9, 2014

* Memorandum Opinion by Bailey, J.

(Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson , J. , and Bailey, J. )

This court has inspected the record in this cause and concludes that there is no

error in the judgment below. Therefore, in accordance with this court ’ s opinion, the

judgment of the trial court is in all things affirmed.
Exhibit



EXHIBIT 10.1


THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANIES
SUPPLEMENTAL RETIREMENT AND INVESTMENT PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 4


THIS INSTRUMENT made as of the 11th day of August, 2017, by the ERISA Management Committee (the “Committee”) of The New York Times Company (the “Company”).
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, the Company maintains The New York Times Companies Supplemental Retirement and Investment Plan, as restated in its entirety effective January 1, 2015 (the “Plan”) for the benefit of certain eligible employees; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 12.01 of the Plan, the Committee has the authority to amend the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Committee desires to amend the Plan to comply with the changes requested by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) in connection with its issuance of a favorable determination letter dated August 3, 2017; 
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of January 1, 2015 as follows:


1.   Section 1.31(b) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


“(b)    for the preceding year had Compensation as defined in Section 415(c)(3) of the Code in excess of $115,000 (as adjusted by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue for the relevant year) and was not in the top-paid group.”





2.   Section 2.01(a) is hereby amended by replacing the year “2010” with the year “2014”.
3.   The first sentence of Section 3.01(d) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and in its place is substituted the following:


“Notwithstanding the foregoing, all Employees who are eligible to make Before-Tax Contributions and Roth Contributions under this Plan and who have attained age 50 before the close of the taxable year shall be eligible to make Catch-Up Contributions in accordance with, and subject to the limitations of, Section 414(v) of the Code.  Catch-Up Contributions shall not be taken into account for purposes of the provisions of the Plan implementing the required limitations of Sections 402(g) and 415 of the Code.”
4.   The first sentence of Section 3.02(b) of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and in its place is substituted the following:


“Upon approval by the Compensation Committee, an Employer shall within the time permitted by Section 404(a)(6) of the Code, contribute a discretionary Profit Sharing Contribution to those Participants who have satisfied the eligibility requirements of Section 2.01(d) in the ratio that such Participant’s Earnings (taking into account only such Earnings as are paid after the date the Employee becomes a Participant in accordance with Section 2.01(d)) bears to the Earnings of all Participants.”   
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the ERISA Management Committee of The New York Times Company has caused this amendment to be executed by a duly appointed member as of the date first set forth above.


	
	
	ERISA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE



	By:    /s/ R. Anthony Benten
PAGE F-13

                                   EXHIBIT 11

                 STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS


The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the
assumption that convertible debentures are converted.


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                           (IN THOUSANDS
                                                                      EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
                                                                      ----------------------
                                                                   1995        1994         1993
                                                                   ----        ----         ----
<S>                                                                <C>         <C>          <C>     
Net earnings                                                       $ 18,969    $ 21,455     $ 18,655

Add interest expense related to convertible
   debenture, net of income taxes                                       193         312          312

                                                               --------------------------------------
Adjusted net earnings for computation (1)                          $ 19,162    $ 21,767     $ 18,967
                                                               ======================================


Weighted average common shares outstanding                            7,344       7,337        7,334

Common equivalent shares from the assumed
   debenture conversion                                                    -        121           96

Adjusted common and common equivalent
                                                               --------------------------------------
   shares for computation (2)                                         7,344       7,458        7,430
                                                               ======================================


Net earnings per common and common equivalent
   shares outstanding (1 / 2)                                      $   2.61    $   2.92     $   2.55
                                                               ======================================

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mine Clearing Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Olson, President, Chief Executive Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/Larry OlsonLarry Olson 
Chief Executive Officer January 14, 2010          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, 
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mine Clearing Corp. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Larry Olson, Chief Financial Officer of the Company and a member of the Board of Directors, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly represents, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Larry OlsonLarry Olson
Chief Financial Officer January 14, 2010
##### 



Exhibit 14
 Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code
 Company Report
 1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 2.
    
    The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the periods
presented in the Report.
  /s/ Collin F. VisaggioCollin F. VisaggioChief Financial Officer
SERVED: August 5, 2013
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SKYWESTAIRLINES, INC. FAA DOCKETNO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Action) FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0617
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2011NM060095) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge Richard C. Goodwin. All future pleadings andother communications regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the otherpersons onthe attached Serv:ice List.

Ronnie
. Yoder ChiefAdministrative Law...,......::1.+1>fB,_ Attachment

- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### FederaJ Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1



### Robert Spitzer, Complainant ·s Counsel 

### Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest Mountain Region, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, W A 98057 TEL: 425-227-1847 FAX: 425-227-1007 ONE COPY



### Michael L. 

### Dworkin, Re5pondent 's Counsel 

### Michael L. 

### Dworkin and Associates 465 California Street, Suite 210 SanFrancisco, CA 94104-1808 TEL: 415-421-2500 FAX: 415-421-2560 Todd C. Emerson, Esq. Director

- Government and Legal Affairs SkyWest Airlines, Respondent 

### 444 South River Road St. George, UT 84790 TEL: 435-634-3530 FAX: 435-634-3505 FDMS Nos. FAA-2013-0617 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430.



### -2-

### The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 Legal Assistant FAX: 202-366-7536



### -3-
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. AP-77,000

EX PARTE MARK ANTHONY FLORES, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 2010CR8783-W1 IN THE 226TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

O P I N I O N

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to theft, and was

sentenced by a jury to twenty years’ imprisonment. 

Applicant contends that he was denied the right to appeal, because despite his continued

expression of desire to appeal, notice of appeal was not timely filed. 

The trial court has determined that Applicant was denied his right to appeal through no fault

of his own. See Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006). We find that Applicant

is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appeal of the judgment of conviction in Cause No.
2

2010CR8783 from the 226th District Court of Bexar County. Applicant is ordered returned to that

time at which he may give a written notice of appeal so that he may then, with the aid of counsel,

obtain a meaningful appeal. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall

determine whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by

counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorneyto represent Applicant on direct appeal. 

All time limits shall be calculated as if the sentence had been imposed on the date on which the

mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant desire to prosecute an appeal, he must

take affirmative steps to file a written notice of appeal in the trial court within 30 days after the

mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division. 

Delivered: March 27, 2013

Do not publish
#### DAVIS v. STATE.

No. 13948.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1931.

J. F. Taulbee, of Georgetown, for appellant,

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State. ■

' LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for rape; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

We find in the record <no bills of exception. Two refused special charges are found, but upon neither is there any notation of exception to its refusal. The statement of facts which accompanies the transcript does not bear the approval of the trial court, and hence cannot be considered. The indictment, the charge of the court, the judgment, and sentence appear regular.

The judgment will be affirmed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1997 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1997
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      33,005,140
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                6,317,928
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (105,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            39,866,807
<PP&E>                                       3,040,765
<DEPRECIATION>                                (779,404)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              46,548,965
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,808,286
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        54,292
<OTHER-SE>                                  43,056,157
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                46,548,965
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            11,774,542
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,118,303
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (36,745)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,090,710
<INCOME-TAX>                                   303,769
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,786,941
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,786,941
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.39
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.39
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23.3**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe have issued our report dated March 29, 2006 accompanying the financial statements of WarriorEnergy Services Corporation appearing in the 2005 Annual Report of Warrior Energy ServicesCorporation to its shareholders and accompanying schedules included in its Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 which are incorporated by reference in this RegistrationStatement. We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of theaforementioned report./s/ Grant Thornton LLPHouston, Texas
From: Reeves, David

To: "Angus Crane (acrane@naima.org)"

Cc: "Fairchild.Susan@epamail.epa.gov"; Hancy, Cindy Wang

Subject: Fiberglass Major Sources

Date: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 2:18:26 PM

Hi Angus – following up on the voice message you left me regarding the JM facilities. Based on the

letter, email, and voice mail you sent, there are currently 9 major source facilities and 21 area

source facilities. The breakdown of major sources, by company, is as follows:

Owens Corning (2) – Newark, OH and Waxahatchie, TX

CertainTeed (1) – Kansas City, KS

Johns Manville (2) – Defiance, OH and Cleburne, TX

Guardian (4) – Albion, MI; Inwood, WV; Mineral Wells, WV; and Winnsboro, SC

The other issue I would like to clarify relates to furnaces being subject to subpart NNN. In a facility

such as OC Newark, OH, they have 4 furnaces but only 1 of the 4 mfg lines are subject to NNN

requirements. In my analysis of potential impacts, I need to know how many furnaces are subject

to NNN and how many will be subject to the new area source requirements. I understood from

Mike Pettis, that he considers all 4 furnaces at Newark to be subject to NNN – but I’m not sure

other companies/states/facilities are all on the same page. This will be an issue for the 9 major

source facilities that have some lines not subject to NNN. Comments?

Dave Reeves

RTI International

dwreeves@rti.org

(919) 316-3739
Exhibit 31.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Trixy Sasnyiuk-Walt, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Aspen Racing Stables,
     Inc.

2.   Based on my knowledge,  this  quarterly  report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to
     make the statements  made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such
     statements  were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this quarterly report.

3.   Based on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
     information  included  in this  quarterly  report,  fairly  present  in all
     material respects the financial  condition,  results of operations and cash
     flows of the  registrant  as of, and for,  the  periods  presented  in this
     quarterly report.

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and
     procedures  (as  defined in Exchange  Act Rules  13a-14 and 15d-14) for the
     registrant and have:

     a.   Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
          disclosure   controls  and   procedures  to  be  designed   under  our
          supervision,  to ensure  that  material  information  relating  to the
          Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us
          by others  within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in
          which this quarterly report is being prepared;

     b.   Evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's  disclosure  controls and
          procedures  and  presented  in this report our  conclusions  about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation.

5.   I have disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation,  to the registrant's
     auditors and the audit  committee of  registrant's  board of directors  (or
     persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a.   All  significant  deficiencies  in the design or operation of internal
          controls  that  could  adversely  affect the  registrant's  ability to
          record,  process,   summarize  and  report  financial  data  and  have
          identified for the  registrant's  auditors any material  weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b.   Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other
          employees who have a  significant  role in the  registrant's  internal
          controls.

Date:  June 4, 2008                 /s/ Trixy Sasnyiuk-Walt
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Trixy Sasnyiuk-Walt President
                                    and Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Prinicpal Executive, Financial,
                                    and Accounting Officer)
#### HOLCOMB et al. v. COPELAND et al.

No. 3711.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

June 16, 1938.

Chas. Ashworth, of Kaufman, for plaintiffs in error.

Carlisle & Henry and Ross Huffmaster, all of Kaufman, for defendants in error.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs in error having filed no briefs upon this writ of error, the same is dis*933missed for want of prosecution. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

Dismissed.