alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                Exhibit 10.18(c)

                      [LETTERHEAD OF METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER]

                                                    December 31, 1997


Bill Asher
Vice President - New Business
Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc.
9242 Beverly Blvd.
Beverly Hills, CA 90210

Dear Bill:

This letter will confirm the material terms of our agreement this date amending
the June 27, 1996 Distribution Agreement, as amended (the "Distribution
Agreement"), between Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc. ("Playboy") and Orion
Home Video ("Orion"), as follows:

1. Orion shall take immediate delivery of *** within 12 business days of full
and satisfactory delivery of each such picture as defined in the Distribution
Agreement. Orion shall have no obligation whatsoever to release, distribute or
account to Playboy for any of the Branded Product.

2. Orion shall take delivery of the *** , as set forth in the Distribution
Agreement, however, Orion will have no obligation whatsoever to release,
distribute or account to Playboy for any of the Unbranded Product. Delivery and
payment of the Guaranteed Advances shall be made in accordance with the delivery
and payment schedule set forth in the Distribution Agreement.

3. In exchange for *** , pursuant to the Production Agreement between Playboy
and Motion Picture Corporation of America ("MPCA") dated February 23, 1994 (the
"MPCA/Playboy Agreement") which amount is represented to be *** as set forth in
the December 17, 1997 statement from Playboy sent by fax to MPCA on December 17,
1997 for the period ending September 30, 1997. The remainder of any and all
amounts owed to MPCA shall be paid to MPCA c/o David Bishop, MGM Home
Entertainment within 5 business days


                      [LETTERHEAD OF METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER]

*** Confidential information omitted pursuant to a request for confidential
    treatment filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
<PAGE>


from the date of this letter agreement. Playboy shall continue to account and
pay to MPCA on a timely basis any and all amounts, whether in the form of
advances or royalties, which become due and owing to MPCA pursuant to the
MPCA/Playboy Agreement.

The parties agree to prepare and execute a long form agreement, however, this
letter agreement shall constitute a binding contract upon signature by both
parties.

                                        Very truly yours,


                                        /s/ Mary Luppi Basich
                                        ----------------------
                                            Mary Luppi Basich


Accepted and agreed to on behalf of
Playboy Entertainment Group, Inc:


By: /s/ William Asher
    ---------------------------

Its: V.P-New Business
     --------------------------

Dated: 12/31/97
       ------------------------
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER
Appellate case name: Patrick Campbell v. The State of Texas
Appellate case number: 01

- 20

- 00 494

- CR

Trial court case number: 1 0

- CR

- 3689

Trial court: 122nd District Court of Galveston County

After obtaining extensions from this Court, a ppellant, Patrick Campbell ’s deadline to file his appellant’s brief was September 6, 2021. However, on August 31, 2021, Campbell filed his third motion for extension of time , requesting a thirty

- day extension to file his brief . In the motion, Campbell represents that the extension is necessary because counsel is in “need of additional time to discuss the underlying Chapter 64 [m] otion and [a] ppeal with the G alveston [County] District Attorney’s Office and complete [Campbell’s] brief due to recently receiving ” various reports related to Campbell’s Chapter 64 motion and appeal. However, on September 8, 2021, Campbell filed his appellant’s brief with this Court . Accordingly, Campbell’s third motion for extension of time to file his brief is dismissed as moot

. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: ____

/s/ April Farris

_______  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date:

__ September 14, 2021

____
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF PHOENIX INTERNATIONAL LTD., INC. FROM FORM 10-Q FOR THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 (FOR SEC USE ONLY) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       1,240,221
<SECURITIES>                                13,149,165
<RECEIVABLES>                               16,106,195
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (660,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,083,382
<PP&E>                                       7,127,819
<DEPRECIATION>                              (3,498,789)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              56,695,535
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        9,593,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,268
<OTHER-SE>                                  44,107,209
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                56,695,535
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,209,447
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                9,415,542
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            15,552,303
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             (27,207)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (9,975,134)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (3,491,297)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (6,483,837)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (6,483,837)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.76)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.76)


</TABLE>
1 Attachment

 	



 
 
 

 
 
    
 
  
 

 

	 





	
 		

!	
 "  #


 	
$


	 % 
 &		 ' 
	

&(  )*) ' ! +,-

#

 .( ,//*)

( 
01)2345*3-)24 66-5

701)2345*32*,-

Part 70 Staffing Plan

Jarrell, Brenda

to:

Alexis North

01/04/2011 03:36 PM

Show Details

History: This message has been replied to.

Southern Ute Indian Tribe Part 70 Program Staffing Plan 010411.docx

Page 1 of 1

file://C:\Documents and Settings\Anorth\Local Settings\Temp\notes0BDDB2\~web6293.ht... 1/20/2011
**Exhibit 99.1****REPROS THERAPEUTICS INC. ANNOUNCES PRICING OF PUBLIC OFFERING OF COMMON STOCK**     THE WOODLANDS, Texas—(BUSINESS WIRE)—Repros Therapeutics Inc. (Nasdaq: RPRX) announced todaythe pricing of its public offering of 2,610,000 shares of its common stock at a public offeringprice of $13.75 per share. All of the shares are being offered by Repros. The underwriters have a30-day option to purchase up to an additional 390,000 shares of common stock to coverover-allotments, if any.     CIBC World Markets Corp. is acting as sole book-running manager in this offering. Punk, Ziegel& Company is acting as co-lead manager. ThinkEquity Partners LLC is acting as co-manager.     A registration statement relating to the shares has been declared effective by the Securitiesand Exchange Commission. Sales of shares pursuant to this offering may be made only by means of thefinal prospectus supplement and related prospectus, copies of which can be obtained from CIBC WorldMarkets Corp. by email at useprospectus@us.cibc.com, by fax at 212-667-6303, or by mail at CIBCWorld Markets Corp., Attn: USE Prospectus Department, 425 Lexington Ave, 5th floor. NY, NY 10017.This press release shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy,nor shall there be any sale of, these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer,solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to the registration or qualification under thesecurities laws of any such jurisdiction.**Contact:**
#### FREYER v. STATE.

No. 19919.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 8, 1938.

Francis M. Chaney, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is robbery; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of eight years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence adduced upon the trial is not brought up for review. No complaints of the rulings of the court have been presented by bills of exception.

, No error having been perceived, the judgment is affirmed.
Page 45 of 51F-21

# EXHIBIT 11

STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS

The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting
     the assumption that dilutive stock options are exercised.

|                                                   | (IN THOUSANDSEXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
|-------------------------------------------------- | -----------------------------------
|
|Net earnings (1)                                   |                                    
|                                                   |                                    
|                                                  
|                                                  
|Weighted average common shares outstanding (2)     |                                    
|                                                  
|Common share equivalents relating to stock options |                                    
|                                                   |                                    
|                                                  
|Adjusted common and common equivalent              |                                    
|shares for computation (3)                         |                                    
|                                                   |                                    
|                                                  
|                                                  
|Net earnings per share:                            |                                    
|Basic    (1/2)                                     |                                    
|                                                   |                                    
|Diluted (1/3)                                      |                                    
|                                                   |                                    

---
Exhibit 99

Review Report of Independent Certified Public Accountants
TIB Financial Corp.

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
of TIB Financial Corp. and Subsidiaries

We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheets of TIB
Financial Corp. and subsidiaries as of June 30, 2001 and the related condensed
consolidated statements of income for the three-month and six-month periods
ended June 30, 2001 and 2000, and changes in the shareholders equity and cash
flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2001 and 2000 included in the
accompanying Securities and Exchange Commission Form 10-Q for the period ended
June 30, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim
financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to
financial data, and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and
accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted
in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding
the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such
an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that
should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to
above for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000, and
the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity,
and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our
report dated February 16, 2001, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those
consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000
is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the consolidated
balance sheet from which it has been derived.

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
August 13, 2001
#### TEEL v. STATE.

No. 18271.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 15, 1936.

Hartwell & Ryan, of Greenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for theft of hogs; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

We find with this record an affidavit, duly sworn to by appellant, asking that the appeal herein be dismissed. The request is granted. The appeal is dismissed.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**THE PENN TRAFFIC COMPANY**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Inconnection with the Annual Report of The Penn Traffic Company (the “Company”)on Form 10-K/A for the fiscal year ending February 3, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Gregory J. Young, President & Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and                 |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,  in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations  of the Company. |

#  

 
| /s/ Gregory J. Young                   |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Gregory J. Young                       |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
|                                   |
| May 8, 2008                       |

 

----
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 11, 2015

No. 04-14-00649-CR

Alex Rene GONZALES,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR7573

Honorable Maria Teresa Herr, Judge Presiding

ORDER

The Appellant’s Motion for Extension of Time to File Brief is hereby GRANTED. The 

Appellant’s brief is due June 25, 2015.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 11th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.4


CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


I, Janine K. Seebeck, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Agilysys, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


Dated: July 29, 2015








By:/s/Janine K. SeebeckJanine K. SeebeckSenior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,and Treasurer
#### CHANGOS v. FORD et al.

No. 8843.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

Sept. 20, 1939.

B. C. Johnson and Xavier Christ, both of Port Arthur, and David E. O’Fiel, of Beaumont, for appellant.

Gerald C. Mann, Atty. Gen., and George W. Barcus, M. C. Martin, and A. S. Rollins, Asst. Attys. Gen., for appellees.

BLAIR, Justice.

Appellant, George N. Changos, applied to the Texas Liquor Control Board for a license to sell wine and beer in the' City of Port Arthur for the year 1938, beginning January 1st. The City of Port' Arthur had by a zoning ordinance or amendment to its home rule charter prohibited the sale of wine and beer within the area where appellant’s place of business was located. The Board refused the license upon the ground that the appellant’s place of business was located in “dry” territory; and appellant seeks by mandamus to compel the Board to issue the license, contending that the ordinance or charter was void for the several reasons stated. The trial court sustained the action of the Board denying the license; hence this appeal.

The appeal presents the identical question determined by the Supreme Court in the case of Tritico v. Texas Liquor Control Board, 128 S.W.2d 379, wherein it is. held that since the license, if issued, would have terminated one year from the date of the issuance, and since the one year had long since expired, the matter in controversy had become moot, and that the “Court of Civil Appeals [126 S.W.2d 738] should have reversed the judgment of the district court and dismissed the cause.” Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the district court in the instant case, because the matter in controversy has become moot, and the cause is hereby dismissed.

Judgment reversed; cause dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-31-1996
<CASH>                                         316,365
<SECURITIES>                                   239,523
<RECEIVABLES>                                   94,467
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    267,082
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,133,573
<PP&E>                                       2,213,889
<DEPRECIATION>                                 251,272
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,819,032
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,057,833
<BONDS>                                      1,743,955
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                  2,258,024
<COMMON>                                    15,031,398
<OTHER-SE>                                   5,282,205
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,819,032
<SALES>                                        122,181
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               714,989
<CGS>                                          354,118
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                4,733,083
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,526,750
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             223,491
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (5,544,844)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (5,544,844)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
----

            COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 404/2005

of 10 March 2005         

concerning tenders notified in response to the invitation to tender for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004

THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES,

Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,

Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1784/2003 of 29 September 2003 on the common organisation of the market in cereals (1), and in particular Article 13(3) thereof,

Whereas:

HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 1

No action shall be taken on the tenders notified from 4 to 10 March 2005 in response to the invitation to tender for the refund for the export of barley issued in Regulation (EC) No 1757/2004.

Article 2

This Regulation shall enter into force on 11 March 2005.

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels, 10 March 2005.

For the Commission

Mariann FISCHER BOEL            

Member of the Commission

----

(1)OJ L 270, 21.10.2003, p. 78.

(2)OJ L 313, 12.10.2004, p. 10.

(3)OJ L 147, 30.6.1995, p. 7. Regulation as last modified by Regulation (EC) No 777/2004 (OJ L 123, 27.4.2004, p. 50).

----