alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Securities
and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ended Decmeber 31, 1996 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
This schedule has been updated to reflect the adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 128, "Earnigns Per Share".
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          72,800
<SECURITIES>                                     5,500
<RECEIVABLES>                                  559,300
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (24,100)
<INVENTORY>                                    548,800
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,386,400
<PP&E>                                       2,163,600
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,497,400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,201,600
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          763,100
<BONDS>                                        489,900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     582,800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,201,600
<SALES>                                      2,275,200
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,275,200
<CGS>                                        1,283,800
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,223,400
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 3,900
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              47,400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 31,200
<INCOME-TAX>                                    16,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                               (56,100)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (41,100)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.90)


</TABLE>
#### Village of Amherst; Aldrich, a Taxpayer, Appellant, *v.*Wragg et al., Appellees.

(No. 28579

Decided March 4, 1942.)

*Mr. D. W. Myers*and *Mr. L. R. Ashenbach,*for appellant.

*Mr. Milton Friedman,*for appellees.

*372By the Court.

This litigation was instituted originally by virtue of Sections 4311 and 4314, General Code, upon request of a taxpayer.

Neither those sections nor the Appellate Procedure Act (Section 12223-1 *et seq.,*General Code) confer upon the taxpayer in the instant case the right to prosecute an appeal. *City of Middletown*v. *City Commission,*138 Ohio St., 596, at page 603 *et seq.,*37 N. E. (2d), 609.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
|   | (1)  | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2)  | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/ Warren G. Lichtenstein                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Warren G. LichtensteinChairman, President, and Chief Executive  Officer(Principal Executive Officer)July      24, 2009 |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: October 8, 2004                           /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth
Square, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
# C_2023186EN.01000701.xml

| 26.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/7

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.107127

(2023/C 186/06)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 25.4.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.107127 |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Region | Lithuania |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | TCTF: Reintroduction of the scheme SA.104975 (2022/N) ‘TCF: Temporary State Aid for Apple Producers’ |
| Legal basis | Draft amendment of the order of Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania of November 28, 2022 No. 3D-734 ‘On the Approval of the Rules for the Provision of Temporary State Aid for the Horticulture Sector’ |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | |
| Intensity | |
| Duration | Until 30.6.2023 |
| Economic sectors | Growing of pome fruits and stone fruits |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Ministry of the Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania |
| Gedimino Ave. 19, 01103 Vilnius, Lithuania |

Date of adoption of the decision

25.4.2023

Aid number

SA.107127

Member State

Lithuania

Region

Lithuania

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

TCTF: Reintroduction of the scheme SA.104975 (2022/N) ‘TCF: Temporary State Aid for Apple Producers’

Legal basis

Draft amendment of the order of Minister of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania of November 28, 2022 No. 3D-734 ‘On the Approval of the Rules for the Provision of Temporary State Aid for the Horticulture Sector’

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Remedy for a serious disturbance in the economy

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Intensity

Duration

Until 30.6.2023

Economic sectors

Growing of pome fruits and stone fruits

Name and address of the granting authority

Ministry of the Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania

Gedimino Ave. 19, 01103 Vilnius, Lithuania

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
#### STAFFORD v. STATE.

No. 13942.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 28, 1931.

Starley *&*Hudson, of Pecos, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, J.

Conviction is for possessing intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale, punishment being one year in the penitentiary..

No bills of exception are brought forward; The evidence is sufficient. Officers, with appellant’s consent, searched his premises. In the house they found more than a quart of whisky in a teapot. They jacked up a corner of the garage and found buried there a milk can in which were two half gallons, two short pints, two “half short” pints of whisky, and eight bottles of “jake.” There seems no question about the evidence being sufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF
                                            CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF
                                  ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT ACQUISITION CORP.

This
certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended
September 30, 2007, of Alternative Asset Management Acquisition Corp. (the Issuer).

I, Mark Klein, the Principal
Executive Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)
     the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)
    the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

|Dated: November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Mark D. Klein
|------------------------ |  | -----------------
|                         |  | Mark D. Klein
#### A. C. BELL, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20833.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 22, 1939.

Conner Scott, of Brownwood, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of property of the value of over $50, and assessed a penalty of ten years confinement in the penitentiary.

Since his appeal was perfected the appellant has filed a written request, verified by his affidavit, asking for the privilege of withdrawing his appeal. The request is granted and the appeal ordered dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I John V.
Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: September 29, 2003                        /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth Square,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.]
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
 Date: May 14, 2008
    /s/ C. Gregory HarperC. Gregory HarperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC
General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP
General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
##### 



Exhibit 5.1
  
 Re:
    
    Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc. Registration Statement on Form S-8; 2007
Incentive Plan, as amended
Opinion issued April 30, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-15-00039-CR

———————————

THOMAS NOLAN WHITE, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 75th District Court

Liberty County, Texas

Trial Court Case No. CR30923

MEMORANDUM OPINION

A jury found appellant, Thomas Nolan White, guilty of the state-jail felony 

offense of theft and sentenced him to two years’ imprisonment. See TEX. PENAL 

CODE ANN. §§ 12.35(a), 31.03(a), (e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2014). Appellant timely 

filed a notice of appeal.
2

Appellant’s appointed counsel on appeal has filed a motion to withdraw, 

along with a brief stating that the record presents no reversible error and the appeal 

is without merit and is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 

1396 (1967). 

Counsel’s brief meets the Anders requirements by presenting a professional 

evaluation of the record and supplying us with references to the record and legal 

authority. 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; see also High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 

807, 812 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel indicates that he has thoroughly 

reviewed the record and is unable to advance any grounds of error that warrant 

reversal. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 1400; Mitchell v. State, 193 

S.W.3d 153, 155 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2006, no pet.).

Appellant filed a response, presenting his own statement of facts and 

arguing, among other things, that his counsel failed to adequately represent him.

We have independently reviewed the entire record in this appeal, and we 

conclude that no reversible error exists in the record, there are no arguable grounds 

for review, and the appeal is frivolous. See Anders, 386 U.S. at 744, 87 S. Ct. at 

1400 (emphasizing that reviewing court—and not counsel—determines, after full 

examination of proceedings, whether appeal is wholly frivolous); Garner v. State, 

300 S.W.3d 763, 767 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (reviewing court must determine 

whether arguable grounds for review exist); Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 
3

826–27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (same); Mitchell, 193 S.W.3d at 155 (reviewing 

court determines whether arguable grounds exist by reviewing entire record). We 

note that an appellant may challenge a holding that there are no arguable grounds 

for appeal by filing a petition for discretionary review in the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals. See Bledsoe, 178 S.W.3d at 827 & n.6.

We affirm the judgment of the trial court and grant counsel’s motion to 

withdraw.1 Attorney Steven Greene must immediately send appellant the required 

notice and file a copy of the notice with the Clerk of this Court. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 6.5(c).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Brown and Lloyd.

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

 

1 Appointed counsel still has a duty to inform appellant of the result of this appeal 

and that he may, on his own, pursue discretionary review in the Texas Court of 

Criminal Appeals. See Ex Parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25, 27 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1997).
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF

TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE



In connection with the Annual Report of Rewards Network Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Kenneth R. Posner, Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



March 12, 2004



|                                                  
|--------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth R. Posner                             
|Kenneth R. Posner                                 
|Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration,
|and Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 167I/2021

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 167I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6412 May 2021 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 167I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6412 May 2021

---

| Contents | | I   Legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2021/764 of 10 May 2021 establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and repealing Decision 2013/743/EU (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

I   Legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2021/764 of 10 May 2021 establishing the Specific Programme implementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation, and repealing Decision 2013/743/EU (
  1
  )

1

1

| | | II   Non-legislative acts |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Council Regulation (Euratom) 2021/765 of 10 May 2021 establishing the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2021-2025 complementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation and repealing Regulation (Euratom) 2018/1563 | 81 |

II   Non-legislative acts

REGULATIONS

*

Council Regulation (Euratom) 2021/765 of 10 May 2021 establishing the Research and Training Programme of the European Atomic Energy Community for the period 2021-2025 complementing Horizon Europe – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation and repealing Regulation (Euratom) 2018/1563

81

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance. |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance.

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
# C_2018315EN.01000501.xml

| 7.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 315/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 315/5

---

Opinion of the Advisory Committee on mergers given at its meeting of 11 April 2018 regarding a draft decision relating to Case M.7993 — Altice/PT Portugal (Article 14(2) procedure)

Rapporteur: France

(2018/C 315/05)

1.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that the Commission’s assessment that the Transaction Agreement concluded between Altice and Oi went beyond what was necessary to preserve the value of the Target’s business and gave Altice the possibility to exercise decisive influence over the Target pending notification and the clearance decision of the Commission.

2.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment that in the instances described in the Decision (i.e. the Post-Paid Campaign, the Porto Canal contract, the selection of a RAN supplier, the Video on Demand contract, the DOG TV contract, the SIRESP shares and the Lactogal contract) Altice went beyond what was necessary to preserve the value of the Target’s business and exercised decisive influence over the Target pending notification and/or the clearance decision of the Commission, as appropriate.

3.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment that the exchanges of commercially sensitive information contributed to Altice’s exercise of decisive influence over certain conducts pertaining to the Target pending notification and the clearance decision of the Commission and cannot be justified on the basis of the need to preserve the value of the Target’s business.

4.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission’s assessment that Altice has at least negligently infringed Article 4(1) of the Merger Regulation (1).

5.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Altice has at least negligently infringed Article 7(1) of the Merger Regulation.

6.

The Advisory Committee agrees with the Commission that Altice should be fined pursuant to Article 14(2)(a) and Article 14(2)(b) of the Merger Regulation.

7.

The Advisory Committee recommends the publication of its opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) (OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1).

1

---