alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Official Journal L 50/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 50 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6122 February 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 50

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6122 February 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/236 of 20 December 2017 correcting the Estonian language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/654 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1628 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to technical and general requirements relating to emission limits and type-approval for internal combustion engines for non-road mobile machinery | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/236 of 20 December 2017 correcting the Estonian language version of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/654 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1628 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to technical and general requirements relating to emission limits and type-approval for internal combustion engines for non-road mobile machinery

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Quarterly Report of American Jianye Greentech Holdings, Ltd.  (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haipeng Wang, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  Date:  November 13, 2010/s/ Haipeng WangName:  Haipeng Wang
Title:  President
(Principal Executive Officer)  This certification accompanies this Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference.
EXHIBIT 23

                    AUDITOR'S CONSENT AND REPORT ON SCHEDULES




Board of Directors and
Stockholders
Photo Control Corporation



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Photo Control Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2000, of
our report, dated January 19, 2001, appearing in the Company's 2000 Annual
Report to Shareholders. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of
such report in the registration statements on Form S-8 for the Photo Control
Stock Option Plan.

In the course of our audit of the financial statements referred to in our
report, dated January 19, 2001, included in the Company's 2000 Annual Report to
Shareholders, we also audited the supporting schedule listed in Item 14(a)(2) of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. In our opinion, the schedule, when considered
in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly
in all material respects the information set forth therein.



January 19, 2001                       VIRCHOW KRAUSE, & COMPANY, LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
-1- 



    	 



    



    	-2- 



    	 



    



    	-3- 



    	 



    



    	-4- 



    	 



    



    	-5-
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

 

**CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Consolidation Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard S. Polep, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

 

(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Registrant

 

Date: September 19, 2012

  

*Consolidation Services, Inc.*

* *

*By: /s/ Richard S. Polep*

  

  

Richard S. Polep

  

  

Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

  |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
##### 



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas P. Richards
 /s/ David W. Wehlmann
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                   9,817,174
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               9,817,174
<CASH>                                         519,964
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,373,482
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                  9,250
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                869,205
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       183,617
<OTHER-SE>                                   6,362,791
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,373,482
<PREMIUMS>                                      58,165
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                             11,472
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                       4,892
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                            26,194
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (21,970)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (7,470)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (14,500)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (14,500)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.08)
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                   9,875
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                              9,250
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                               5,517
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                  9,250
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos.
33-39987, 33-56728, and 333-39726 on Form S-8 of our reports dated October 11,
2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of
Possis Medical, Inc. and subsidiaries, and management's report on the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting appearing in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Possis Medical, Inc. and subsidiaries for the
year ended July 31, 2006.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Minneapolis, Minnesota
October 13, 2006


                                       63
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

REAPPOINTMENTS TO INTERBRANCH 

COMMISSION FOR GENDER, RACIAL 

AND ETHNIC FAIRNESS

:

:

:

:

:

NO. 487

JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2017, Lucille Marsh, Esquire, Lackawanna 

County, and Rhonda Hill Wilson, Esquire, Philadelphia, are hereby reappointed as 

members of the Interbranch Commission for Gender, Racial and Ethnic Fairness for a 

term of two years, commencing December 31, 2017.
#### COOK v. STATE.

No. 19940.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

June 15, 1938.

R. H. Templeton, of Wellington, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for driving an automobile upon the public highway while under the influence of intoxicating, liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Upon the written request of the appellant, duly verified by his affidavit, the appeal is dismissed.
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE 

CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING 

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. 

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA 

In The Supreme Court 

Harold Anthony Trout, Petitioner, 

v. 

State of South Carolina, Respondent. 

Appellate Case No. 2013-001047 

Appeal From Greenville County 

The Honorable D. Garrison Hill, Trial Judge 

The Honorable W. Jeffrey Young, Post-Conviction Relief Judge 

Memorandum Opinion No. 2014-MO-044 

Submitted October 22, 2014 – Filed October 29, 2014 

AFFIRMED 

J. Falkner Wilkes, of Greenville, for Petitioner. 

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Chief Deputy 

Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant 

Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Senior 

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Karen Christine 

Ratigan, all of Columbia, for Respondent. 
PER CURIAM: Petitioner seeks a writ of certiorari from the denial of his 

application for post-conviction relief (PCR). 

We deny the petition on Petitioner's Question II. Because there is sufficient 

evidence to support the PCR judge's finding that Petitioner did not knowingly and 

intelligently waive his right to a direct appeal, we grant the petition for a writ of 

certiorari on Petitioner's Question I and proceed with a review of petitioner's direct 

appeal issues pursuant to Davis v. State, 288 S.C. 290, 342 S.E.2d 60 (1986). 

Petitioner's conviction and sentence are affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), 

SCACR, and the following authorities: Issue 1: State v. Pinckney, 339 S.C. 346, 

529 S.E.2d 526 (2000) (stating if there is any direct or substantial circumstantial 

evidence reasonably tending to prove the defendant's guilt, an appellate court must 

find the case was properly submitted to the jury); Issues 2 and 5: State v. Sheppard, 

391 S.C. 415, 706 S.E.2d 16 (2011) (holding an argument not raised to the trial 

judge was not preserved for appellate review); Issue 3: Rule 801(c), SCRE; Player 

v. Thompson, 259 S.C. 600, 193 S.E.2d 531 (1972) (holding statements offered not 

for the truth of the matter asserted, but as evidence of notice do not constitute 

hearsay); Issue 4: State v. Santiago, 370 S.C. 153, 634 S.E.2d 23 (Ct. App. 2006) 

(citing State v. Roper, 274 S.C. 14, 260 S.E.2d 705 (1979) ("[A] proffer of 

testimony is required to preserve the issue of whether testimony was properly 

excluded by the trial judge, and an appellate court will not consider error alleged in 

the exclusion of testimony unless the record on appeal shows fairly what the 

excluded testimony would have been."). 

AFFIRMED. 

TOAL, C.J., PLEICONES, BEATTY, KITTREDGE and HEARN, JJ., 

concur.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000803

06-FEB-2020

08:32 AM
Need to return call by / at/between and . Signature:

Project No.: 0172.09.005.412 Page 1 of 1

Project Name: 304m 2012 Annual Review CBI?

Yes

No

TELEPHONE CALL RECORD

Incoming

Outgoing

Date: 01/25/12 Time: 8:50 am

pm

Company Name: Pennsylvania Department of 

Environmental Protection

ERG Staff Name: Elizabeth Sabol

Contact Name: Tom Randis Contact Phone Number: (570) 327-0530

General Subject: Meat and Poultry Facility Discharges

TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN

I contacted Dave Gard of the PA DEP to discuss nitrate discharges from Cargill Meat Solutions Corp in 

Wyalusing, PA (PA0111759). Mr. Gard suggested that I contact Tom Randis (570-327-0530) for further 

information.

I called Mr. Randis on Monday, January 30, 2012 at 12:00 pm EST and left a message. On Friday, February 3, 

Mr. Randis returned my call and stated that the nitrogen permit limits for the Cargill Meat facility are currently 

under revision. The limits are not based on the ELGs; however, the more stringent TMDLs for the Chesapeake 

Bay. The old permit was monitoring only for nitrogen. 

Mr. Randis stated that the facility is a butchering/meat packing facility. The facility operates an 

anaerobic/aerobic wastewater treatment process; however, they did not make any treatment changes in response 

to the ELGs, because the new permit limits (based on TMDLs for the Bay) would be more stringent. The 

facility permit is currently under appeal. Mr. Randis stated that comments were due back by March 30, 2012. 

He stated that he would get back to me at that time with the comments and limits. He also provided his e-mail; 

TRandis@pa.gov, so that I could follow up.
Exhibit
      23




Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm




The
      Board
      of Directors and


Stockholders
      of Porta Systems Corp.


Syosset,
      New York




We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Reg.
      No. 333-68321) and (Reg. No. 333-72369) on Form S-8 of our report dated March
      24, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements and financial
      statement schedule of Porta Systems Corp. appearing in the Company’s Annual
      Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Our report contains
      an
      explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going
      concern.




/s/
      BDO
      Seidman, LLP





BDO
      Seidman, LLP


Melville,
      New York




March
      26,
      2008
#### Ex parte PERKINS.

No. 14431.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 20, 1931.

State’s Rehearing Denied June 24, 1931.

*124O. M. Lord and David E. O’Eiel, both of Beaumont, for appellant.

Hollis M. Kinard, Co. Atty., of Orange, and Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment denying bail in a habeas corpus proceeding.

From the evidence it appears that the deceased, White, and Leonard Carr, went about midnight to .the home of the appellant. He was in bed. The parties were admitted, however, and after some friendly conversation, Carr went for some cigarettes. Upon his return, White was dead. Appellant said that he had killed White in defense of his own life and gave the details of the killing. These matters were introduced by the state, that is, the appellant’s admission that he killed White and his declaration of exculpatory facts were introduced upon behalf of the state. By circumstances the state undertook to rebut the testimony of innocence and self-defense introduced by it and establish the offense of murder upon malice aforethought.

The appellant testified in his own behalf, claiming that he was assaulted by White, was fired upon by him, and that he killed White in self-defense while the latter was trying to kill him. There were circumstances showing that White was shot twice. There was evidence of bullets having struck parts of the building which coincided with the theory advanced by the appellant in his testimony.

The evidence before the court is not deemed such as to justify the refusal of bail. In the Constitution, art. 1, § 11, it is said: “All prisoners shall be bailable by sufficient sureties, unless for capital offences, when the proof is evident.”

It has been said in many cases: “ ‘Proof is evident’ if the evidence is clear and strong, leading a well guarded and dispassionate judgment to the conclusion that the offense has been committed; that the accused is the guilty agent; and that he would probably be punished capitally if the law is administered, and in such ease bail is not a matter of right. Ex parte Smith, 23 Tex. App. 100, 5 S. W. 99.”

The judgment denying bail is reversed, and the appellant is ordered discharged upon bail, with good and sufficient sureties, in the sum of $10,000.

On Motion for, Rehearing.

LATTIMORE, J.

 This court must take the record in any case as it appears here and base its judgment upon same. When the question involved is the right to bail, this court must grant bail, unless we are impressed with the belief that on the facts presented, a fair jury would inflict the death penalty. Our opinion granting bail is no prejudgment of the testimony which may be introduced upon the trial hereafter had, and merely expresses our view of the testimony heard before the trial court appearing in the record. We are of opinion the case was correctly decided.

The state’s motion for rehearing is overruled.
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AEC	 Annual Energy Consumption

AEO	 Annual Energy Outlook

ANOPR	 Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

ANSI	 American National Standards Institute

ASHRAE	 American Society of Heating, Refrigeration and Air­Conditioning

Engineers

BOM	 bill of materials

BT	 building technologies

BTU	 British thermal units

BVM	 beverage vending machine

CBEC	 Commercial Building Energy Consumption Survey

CEC	 compressor energy consumption

CFC	 chlorofluorocarbons

CFR	 Code of Federal Regulations

COGS	 cost of goods sold

CRE	 commercial refrigeration equipment

CRI	 color rendering index

CMER	 consumer marginal energy rates

CSL	 candidate standard level

DAT	 discharge air temperature

DC	 direct current

DEC	 daily energy consumption

DOE	 U.S. Department of Energy

DOJ	 U.S. Department of Justice

ECM	 electronically commutated motors

EER	 energy efficiency ratio

EHD	 electro­hydrodynamic

EIA	 Energy Information Administration

EPA	 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

EPACT 1992	 Energy Policy Act of 1992

EPACT 2005	 Energy Policy Act of 2005

EPCA	 Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975

°F	 degrees Fahrenheit

FTC	 U.S. Federal Trade Commission

GRIM	 Government Regulatory Impact Model

HCFC	 hydrocholorofluorcarbon

HFC	 hydrofluorocarbon

INC	 incremental cost

ImSET	 Impact of Sector Energy Technologies

kWh	 kilowatt hours

LCC	 life­cycle cost

LED	 light emitting diode

Low­E	 low­emissivity

LSHX	 liquid­suction heat exchangers

AA­i

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 22
     

     

     

     

     

            

          

        

     

       

          

        

      

         

       

     

     

         

      

     

     

     

     

   

        

       

       

   

        

MPC manufacturing production cost

MIA manufacturer impact analysis

MLP manufacturer list price

MPC manufacturer production cost

MSP manufacturer selling price

NAICS North American Industry Classification System

NEMS National Energy Modeling System

NES national energy savings

NIA national impact analysis

NPV net present value

NOPR Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

ODP ozone depletion potential

PBP payback period

PPI producer price indices

PSI pounds per square inch

PSC permanent split capacitor

R&D research and development

RTTC Refrigeration and Thermal Test Center

RIA regulatory impact analysis

SBA U.S. Small Business Administration

SCT saturated condenser temperature

SEC U.S. Securities Exchange Commission

SET saturated evaporator temperature

SPM shaded­pole motors

TSD Technical Support Document

TSL trial standard level

USC United States Code

W watt

WACC weighted­average cost of capital

AA­ii

EERE-2006-STD-0125 COMMENT 22
EXHIBIT 32.1






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Possis Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert G. Dutcher,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                              /S/ ROBERT G. DUTCHER
                                              ----------------------------
                                              Robert G. Dutcher
                                              Chief Executive Officer
                                              October 7, 2005



                                       73