alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022130EN.01001001.xml

| 23.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 130/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 130/10

---

Summary of European Commission Decisions on authorisations for the placing on the market for the use and/or for use of substances listed in Annex XIV to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH)

(Published pursuant to Article 64(9) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (1))

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 130/08)

Decision partially granting an authorisation

| Reference of the decision (2) | Date of decision | Substance name | Holder of the authorisation | Authorisation number | Authorised use | Date of expiry of review period | Reasons for the decision |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| C(2022) 1503 | 16 March 2022 | Pitch, coal tar, high-temp. (‘CTPht’)
  EC No: 266-028-2, CAS No: 65996-93-2 | Industrial Quimica del Nalon, S.A., Avda. Galicia 31, 33005, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain | REACH/22/10/0 | Use of CTPht in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 | 4 October 2032 | In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies. |

Reference of the decision (2)

Date of decision

Substance name

Holder of the authorisation

Authorisation number

Authorised use

Date of expiry of review period

Reasons for the decision

C(2022) 1503

16 March 2022

Pitch, coal tar, high-temp. (‘CTPht’)

EC No: 266-028-2, CAS No: 65996-93-2

Industrial Quimica del Nalon, S.A., Avda. Galicia 31, 33005, Oviedo, Asturias, Spain

REACH/22/10/0

Use of CTPht in formulation of mixtures exclusively for industrial uses that are outside the scope of the authorisation requirement set out in Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006

4 October 2032

In accordance with Article 60(4) of Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006, the socio-economic benefits outweigh the risk to human health and the environment from the use of the substance and there are no suitable alternative substances or technologies.

---

(1)  OJ L 396, 30.12.2006, p. 1.

(2)  The decision is available on the European Commission website at: Authorisation (europa.eu).

---
##### 



Exhibit 3.1
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
 CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
 OF
 ORION MARINE GROUP, INC.
(a Delaware corporation)
 (Pursuant to Sections 228, 242 and 245 of the
 General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware)
 DGCL
    ARTICLE 1
 Corporation
 ARTICLE 2
  ARTICLE 3
  ARTICLE 4
 Authorized Capital Stock Common Stock
 1




---



##### 



Preferred Stock paragraph
B ARTICLE 4 Series A Preferred Stock Exhibit A Effective Time provided
  Rights and Preferences of the Preferred Stock Board of Directors provided Exhibit A
 2




---



##### 



Description of the Common Stock
 General paragraph D ARTICLE 4
 Voting Rights paragraph D ARTICLE
4 paragraph D ARTICLE 4 ARTICLE 5
 Dividends
 Liquidation
 Foreign Ownership of Stock
 In General subparagraphs
3 4 5 paragraph D ARTICLE 4 Maritime Laws
 3




---



##### 



Dual Stock Certificate System subparagraph 1 subparagraph 1
 Restrictions on Issuance and Transfer, Change of Status
 paragraph D ARTICLE
4
  No Voting Rights; Temporary Withholding of Dividends and Other Distributions Excess Shares
 4




---



##### 



Redemption of Excess Shares
 Non-U.S. Citizen Redemption Price subparagraph 4
    5




---



##### 



Determination of Citizenship subparagraph 6
 Severability subparagraphs 1 6 paragraph D ARTICLE 4
 Definitions paragraph D ARTICLE 4
 Fair Market Value Market Price NYSE NASDAQ
 6




---



##### 



Owner Own
 U.S. Citizen subclause (b) subclause (e)
 Non-U.S. Citizen
 Permitted Percentage
 7




---



##### 



Person
 ARTICLE 5
 Bylaws
 Classification
 Election
 Written Ballot
 Cumulative Voting
 Removal
 Vacancies
 8




---



##### 



ARTICLE 6
 provided
 ARTICLE 7
  ARTICLE 8
  ARTICLE 9
  ARTICLE 10
  9




---



##### 



ARTICLE 11
  ARTICLE 12
  ARTICLE 13
  10




---



##### 



ARTICLE 13 Continuing Directors
 ARTICLE 14
 provided ARTICLE 5 6 7 8 10 11 13 14
  /s/ J. Michael PearsonJ. Michael Pearson, President 11




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 DESIGNATIONS OF SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK
  Dividends
 Class A Stock part 2 Exhibit A part
3 Exhibit A Board
 Priority on Dividends provided
 Non-Cash Dividends part 1 Exhibit A
 A-1




---



##### 



Liquidation Preference
 Series A Preferred Stock Liquidation Preference Original Issue Price
 Participation Rights paragraph 2.1 Exhibit A paragraph 2.1 Exhibit A
 Merger or Sale of Assets part 2 Exhibit
A paragraphs 2.1 2.2 Change of Control
 Liquidation Notice
 A-2




---



##### 



paragraph 2.3 Exhibit A part 2 Exhibit A
 Repurchase
 Repurchase Date Repurchase Date Repurchase Price
 Repurchase Notice Repurchase Notice
 Available Funds, etc.
 A-3




---



##### 



Deposit of Repurchase Price paragraph 3.4 Exhibit
A
 Certificates, etc
 Pro rata Repurchases
 Voting Rights
   A-4




---



##### 



A-5




---



##### 



Bylaws
     Registration of Transfer
 Replacement A-6
        Definitions Exhibit A
 Approved Plan provided paragraph 4 Exhibit A
 Debt Security
 Equity Security
 Fair Market Value
 Person
 Stockholders Agreement
 Subsidiary
 Amendment and Waiver Exhibit A provided A-7
       provided, further
 Notices
 A-8
#### Guy NABORS, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20771.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 15, 1939.

Baskett & Parks, of Dallas, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

HAWKINS, Presiding Judge.

Conviction is for murder, punishment being nine years in the penitentiary.

Since perfecting his appeal appellant has filed with this court his affidavit ad*920vising that he does not desire to prosecute said appeal, and at his request same is dismissed.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-18-00306-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.R., L.R., and C.J., Children

From the 224th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017PA01218

Honorable Richard Garcia, Associate Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Sitting: Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

Delivered and Filed: September 26, 2018

MOTION TO WITHDRAW DENIED; AFFIRMED 

The Texas Department of Family and Protective Services filed this suit, seeking to 

terminate the rights of the parents of the children S.R., L.R., and C.J.1 The record reflects the 

father of S.R. and L.R. was determined to be deceased. After a trial to the bench, the court 

designated A.L., the paternal grandfather of S.R. and L.R., to be their permanent managing 

conservator; named C.J.’s father, C.J., his permanent managing conservator; designated the 

children’s mother, E.R., a possessory conservator of all three children; and dismissed the 

Department from the case. E.R. timely appealed the trial court’s order.

 1 To protect the identity of the minor children, we refer to the parties by their initials. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN.

§ 109.002(d) (West Supp. 2017); TEX. R. APP. P. 9.8.
04-18-00306-CV

- 2 -

Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief in which he concluded there 

are no non-frivolous issues to be raised on appeal. Counsel certified that he sent E.R. a copy of 

the brief and a letter advising her of his conclusion and of her rights to review the record and to 

file a pro se brief. Counsel’s letter also provided E.R. a form to use to request access to the record 

and enclosed a copy of counsel’s motion to withdraw, which counsel stated he had filed. Counsel 

subsequently filed a motion to withdraw in this court. 

The brief minimally meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d 24, 27 n.10 (Tex. 2016) (stating that Anders procedures protect 

indigent parents’ statutory right to counsel on appeal in parental rights termination cases and apply 

in those cases). Appellant did not request access to the appellate record, and this court then set a 

deadline for appellant to file a pro se brief. Appellant did not file a pro se brief. 

We have thoroughly reviewed the record and the attorney’s Anders brief, and we agree 

with counsel that the appeal is without merit. See Interest of K.S.L., 538 S.W.3d 107, 112 (Tex. 

2017). We therefore affirm the trial court’s order. However, we deny counsel’s motion to 

withdraw because the motion does not assert any ground for withdrawal apart from counsel’s 

conclusion that the appeal is frivolous. See In re P.M., 520 S.W.3d at 27; In re A.M., 495 S.W.3d 

573, 583 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2016, pet. denied). Counsel’s duty to his client extends 

through the exhaustion or waiver of all appeals, including the filing of a petition for review in the 

Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. FAM. CODE ANN. § 107.016(2) (West 2014); In re P.M., 520 

S.W.3d at 27.

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the quarterly report of SURFACE COATINGS, INC. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in
the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:





1. the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  January
30, 2009





/s/ Rick
Pietrykowski





Name:
Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief
Executive Officer











Dated:  January
30, 2009





/s/ Rick
Pietrykowski





Name:
Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.2**

CERTIFICATIONS

I,Patrick E. McCready, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ChannellCommercial Corporation;

2.                     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.                     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)              Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)             Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

c)              Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter  (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting; and

5.                     Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)              All significant deficienciesand material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

b)             Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Date: November 14, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Patrick E. McCready |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   | Patrick E. McCready     |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 January 30, 2007
Date of Report
(Date of earliest event reported)
 SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
  Delaware
    
    1-8514
    
    95-3822631(State or other jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission
    
    (I.R.S. Employerincorporation or organization)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 411 N. Sam Houston Parkway, Suite 600
Houston, Texas
 77060
 (281) 443-3370
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial ConditionItem 9.01. Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATUREEXHIBIT INDEXPress Release    Table of Contents  
 Item 2.02. Results of Operations and Financial Condition
   
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits
 (c)
    
    Exhibit
 99.1
    
    Press Release dated January 30, 2007 with respect to the
Registrants financial results for the quarter ended December 31, 2006.




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURE
  SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.Date: January 30, 2007
    
    /s/ Richard E. Chandler, Jr.By: Richard E. Chandler, Jr.Senior Vice President,General Counsel and Secretary




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Press Release by the Registrant dated January 30, 2007.
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
CYNTHIA WILLIAMS , ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 2 4

- 11 3 (UNA) ) (VIVINT) DAVID BYWATER , ) ) Defendant. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on review of pro se p laintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis and civil complaint

. The Court GRANTS the application and, for the reasons stated below, DISMISSES the c omplaint and this civil action without prejudi ce
. The Court has reviewed p laintiff’s complaint, keeping in mind that complaints filed by

pro se litigants are held to less stringent standards than ar e applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers. See Haines v. Kerner , 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). Even pro se litigants must comply
with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch , 656 F. Supp. 237, 239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a complaint contain a
short a nd plain statement of the grounds upon which the Court’s jurisdiction depends, a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief, and a demand for judgment for the relief the pleader seeks. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a). The purpose of the minimum
standard of Rule 8 is to give fair notice to the defendants of the claim being asserted, sufficient to prepare a responsive answer, to prepare an adequate defense and to determine whether the
doctrine of res judicata applies. Brown v. Califano , 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).2

Plaintiff purports to bring two claims: breach of contract and violation of the Privacy Act.
The breach of contract presumably occurr ed when she “received a phone call telling [her that her] system was being taken out , ” yet she did not receive a phone call from Vivint. Compl. at 1. According to plaintiff, David Bywater is the person who removed the system, and he allegedly also accepted “Bribes in exchange for excess [sic] to [plaintiff’s] residence.” Id

. The Privacy Act violation presumably occurred when unidentified persons gaine d access to plaintiff’s residence, and when “in the middle of the night [she] was spoken to” through a speaker. Id

. She demands an award of $2 billion for the “mental stress” she has experienced. Id

. So few cogent facts are alleged that the named defe ndant would not have adequate notice of the legal claims against him

. For example, p laintiff alleges breach of a contract and fails to
describe the contract’s terms. And if plaintiff intends to bring a claim under the Privacy Act, see 5 U.S.C. § 552a, the claim would fail because the Act applies only to an agency of the Executive Branch of the federal government, see 5 U.S.C. §§ 551, 552a(a)(1). As drafted, the compl aint fails to meet the minimal pleading standard set forth in Rule 8 , and it will be dismissed

. An Order is issued separately.

DATE: February 26, 2024 RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelby Acquisition II, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended January 31, 2008 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      James R. Kerr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                James R. KerrJames
                R. Kerr
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              Principal
                Financial Officer
              March
                17, 2008
# C_2022420EN.01000901.xml

| 3.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 420/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 420/9

---

Information communicated by Member States regarding closure of fisheries

(2022/C 420/07)

In accordance with Article 35(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Union control system for ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy (1), a decision has been taken to close the fishery as set down in the following table:

| Date and time of closure | 31.7.2022 |
| --- | --- |
| Duration | 31.7.2022 – 31.12.2022 |
| Member State | Italy |
| Fishing effort group code | EFF2/MED2_TR4 |
| Stock group | Giant red shrimp in GSAs 8, 9, 10 and 11 |
| Type(s) of fishing vessels | Vessels with overall length ≥ 24 m |
| Reference number | 08/TQ110 |

Date and time of closure

31.7.2022

Duration

31.7.2022 – 31.12.2022

Member State

Italy

Fishing effort group code

EFF2/MED2_TR4

Stock group

Giant red shrimp in GSAs 8, 9, 10 and 11

Type(s) of fishing vessels

Vessels with overall length ≥ 24 m

Reference number

08/TQ110

---

(1)  OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.

---
**MEMORANDUM**

**Date:** August 21, 2015 **From:** Anita Lee, EPA Region 9 **To:** Proposed Federal Plan Requirements for Greenhouse G as Emissions from Electric Utility Generating Units , Docket Id: EPA-HQ-OAR-2015-0199 **Subject:** Discussion of the Proposed Federal Plan Requirement s during Teleconference between Navajo Nation and EPA on August 17, 2015

**___________________________________________________ __________________________________**  **Summary:** EPA Region 9 provided information on the Proposed F ederal Plan Requirements for Greenhouse Gas Emissio ns from Electric Utility Generating Units during a tel econference between Navajo Nation and EPA on August 17, 2015. The Proposed Federal Plan Requirements for G reenhouse Gas Emissions from Electric Utility Gener ating Units was proposed on August 3, 2015.

**Attendees: External Stakeholders**  • Raju Bisht, Navajo Nation EPA • Eugenia Quintana, Navajo Nation EPA • April Quinn, Navajo Nation Department of Justice **EPA** • Colleen McKaughan, EPA Region 9 • Ann Lyons, EPA Region 9 • Ben Machol, EPA Region 9 • Anita Lee, EPA Region 9 • Nate Topham, OAQPS • Jeremy Mark, OAP • Jeremy Schreifels, OAP

**ATTACHMENT** File titled “2015_0817 Attachment to Navajo Nation Technical Call.xlsx”
----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

----

|                                |
|--------------------------------|
|                                |  |
| (Corporate Seal)               | FIRST COMMONWEALTH FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
| /s/ Rose S. Waltermire Witness | By:/s/ T. Michael Price   Name:  T. Michael Price   Title:    President and CEOEXECUTIVE |
| /s/Amanda FisherWitness        | /s/ Norman J. Montgomery |
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of JAG MEDIA GROUP, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  November 11, 2009





/s/ Charles Stidham





Name: Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  November 11, 2009





/s/ Charles Stidham





Name: Charles Stidham


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/  Jack AntoniniJack AntoniniPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)August 14, 2007
 43