PARTICULATE/HF/HC1 EMISSIONS

TESTING ON THE SCRUBBER/BAGHOUSE EXHAUST OF TUNNEL IGLN #1 BORAL BRICKS,

INC. AUGUSTA PLANT 4 1630 ARTHERN

ROAD Augusta(Richmond County),

Georgia

30901 Project # 02131
October 16-17, 2002
Testing conducted

for: Mr. David Johnson Environmental Manager Boral Bricks, Inc. PO Box 1178 Columbus, Georgia

31902 (334) 480-2487

ANALYTICAL

TESTING

CONSULTANTS,

INC. 301 Brookdale

Street /, Kannapolis,

N. C. 28083

/ (704) 932-3193

phone (800) 733-3193

toll-free (704) 932-0570

fax
corp @atc-net.net

e-mail www.atc-net.net Web page Distribution: Mr. David Johnson (Five copies)
Issue Date: November 14, 2002TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Number Introduction

.......................................... 3 Certification of Results

........................... 3 Source Description

..................................... 4 Results and Process Summary

............................ 5 Results, Conclusions

and Comments 8 Sampling and Analytical

Procedures 10 References

.......................................... 11 Test ONE Isokinetic

Data and Calculations Emission Rate Calculations 13 Isokinetic Data and Calculations 16 Moisture Data

................................. 19 Isokinetic Sampling

Rate Calculation 20 Test TWO Isokinetic

Data and Calculations Emission Rate Calculations 21 Isokinetic Data and Calculations 24 Moisture Data

.................................. 27 Isokinetic Sampling

Rate Calculation 28 Sample Calculations

................................... 29 Nomenclature

.............. 31 Calculation Formulae 33 Appendix I

............... 36 Sampling Data Sheets 37 Stack Sketches 50 Enthalpy Analytical,

Inc. Lab Report

53 Analytical Testing Consultants,

Inc. Lab Report

125 LELAP Certification

..................... 139 Process Data

.................................. 150 Calibration Data 172 Page 2 of 202INTRODUCTION

This

report presents

the results of particulate/hydrogen fluoride/hydrogen

chloride

emissions testing conducted

on the scrubber/baghouse

exhaust of the Plant 4 #1 Tunnel Kiln. Emissions testing via US EPA methods

5/26a was performed

by Analytical

Testing Consultants,

Inc. of Kannapolis, NC. The two man test team consisted

of Dan McCombs

and Kevin Adkins. Testing was completed

on Wednesday

and Thursday,

October

16-17, 2002. Ms. DeAnna

Oser of the Georgia

Department

of Natural Resources

witnessed

portions

of the sampling.

Mr. David Johnson of Boral Bricks was on site during sampling

and was responsible

for collection

of process data. Two separate

tests of three one-hour

runs were conducted

each day changing

the operation parameters

of the dry lime scrubber

and the pressure

drop across the baghouse. Executive Summary
Both tests showed the HF and HC1 emissions

were well below levels contained

in facility Part 70 operating permit (3251-245-0009-V-01-5) of 2.25 lbs per hour. Runs 1,2,3 averaged

0,,D,I'• o. lbs/hr particulate,

<0.046 lbg/hr HF and 0.079 lbs/hr HC1. Runs 4,5,6 average were 0.372 lbs/hr particulate, <0.007 lbs/hr HF and 0.038 Ibs/hr HC1. Allowable

particulate

emissions/are

based upon total quantltaes

from

:

.r •,,,,,•:

•,•,•

1o, an,• the Tunnel Kiln #1 [Rule 391-3-1-.02(2)(e)].

The kiln average 9.18 tons per hour on October

16 th and 8.26 tons per hour on October

17 th.

CERTIFICATION OF RESULTS "By out" signature we certify that the testing and the reporting of the test results contained

herein are prepared to the best of our abilities and that, to our knowledge,

the data have been calculated

and reported correctly.

No data or information

has knowingly

been omitted."

W. Keith Poole Laboratory Manager/Technical

Director C. Daniel McCornbs Quality Manager/Team

Leader

Page 3 of 202PROCESS DESCRIPTION

Belt conveyors

transport

prepared

clay form the Processed

Clay Storage Building

bays to Plant 4 [i.e. via the Clay Feed System Conveyors

(P4) (ID CB401)].

The materials

are conveyed

to Plant 4 where they feed the Plant 4 brick forming

line. The forming

line starts with a surge bin (ID SB401) which feeds two (2) pug mills in series. Water may be added at the pug mills depending
on the moisture

content of the clay. The "pugged"

clay then enters an extruder

and is formed as a column of brick. The column of brick may or may not be sand coated and textured

(SC 401), though typically

not. Once the column is coated/textured,

it is then cut into green bricks. Green brick are stacked onto kiln cars by a setting machine

and are placed in a holding

area where the moisture

content is lowered

slightly.

The kiln cars exit theholding

area directly into a set of Tunnel dryers for primary

drying. The dryers are heated with waste heat from the cooling sections of the kiln. A pressure

differential

is maintained

within the kiln to prevent hot air and pollutants from entering

the kiln cooling section.

Therefore,

pollutant

emissions

from the dryer stacks are negligible. Finally, dried brick are moved directly

from the dryers into Tunnel Kiln #1 (EU401)

[Tunnel Kiln #2 (EU402)

is a proposed

future kiln]. The tunnel kiln is fueled by natural gas with propane
as a backup fuel. Final evaporation

of free water, dehydration,

oxidation,

vitrification,

flashing, and cooling of bricks occurs in the kiln. Emissions

from the kiln are routed through

a single control device.

The control equipment

(CE401)

serves to reduce HF and HC1 emissions

from the kiln. Brick exiting the kiln are packaged

and moved to outside storage prior to distribution.
The tunnel kiln control device-CE401-is

a Hydrated

lime Powdered

Injection

Scrubber

(w/ Venturi Reactor).

This serves to reduce the emissions

of HF and HC1 in the airstream

prior to release to atmosphere

through

the single 59.25' round, vertical stack}

IProcess description provided

by Environmental Manager,

Boral

Bricks,

Inc.

David

Johnson, Page 4 of 202RESULTS SUMMARY

SYSTEM Boral Bricks Tunnel Kiln #1

TEST DATE

10/16/02 PARAMETER Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 GENERAL QS, FLOW, ACFM

51629

49929

50539 Q STD DRY, FLOWSCFM

38592

37141

37513 Vm STD (ft3)

42.94

40.48

40.93 %1 104.23

102.10

102.21

PARTICULATE EMISSIONS
PMRc (Ibs/hr)

0.083 Cs (GR/SCFD)

0.0003

HYDROGEN FLUORIDE

EMISSIONR
PMRc (Ibs/hr)

<0.008 ALLOWABLE (Ibs/hr) HYDROGEN CHLORIDE

EMISSIONR
PMRc (Ibs/hr)

0.127 ALLOWABLE (Ibs/hr) 0.1940.0006

0.065

0.04

0.3030.0009

0.064

0.08

AVERAGE

5069937749

0.1940.0006

<0.046
2.25

0.0792.25

Page 5 of 202Boral Bricks,

Augusta

Plant 4 Operating

Conditions

during

Stack Test October 16 17, 2002 Provided by Boral Bricks

Inc.
Kiln (EU401)

Operatin.q

Conditions'

DATE 10/16/02 PUSH RATE(CPD)*2O

BRICKS PER CAR4368 10/17/02 18**

4368

8.26 THROUGHPUT (TPH)* :--_• 9.18

Product in kilns: Standard

size Savannah

Brown (10-670 flashed)

pavers Average fired brick weight: 5.044 fbs.*
CPD Kiln Cars per Day, TPH Tons per Hour.. Plant was unable to achieve the manufacturing

level necessary

to maintain the 20 cpd push for both days. ***Based on 5 brick samples weighing.

5.05, 5.03, 5.06, 5.04, and 5.04 Ibs each

Control Device

(CE401)

Operatinq

Conditions:
Two separate

performance

tests were conducted

under separate

control device operating conditions in order to confirm the operating

ranges that demonstrate

compliance.

The first test (Runs 1-3) was conducted

at a low reagent feed rate while maintaining

a mid to low pressure drop across the baghouse.

The second test (Runs 4-6) was conducted

at a slightly higher reagent feed rate and an even lower pressure

drop. Two additional

engineering

tests were conducted on October 17 •h and the results of those tests will be provided

under separate

cover. The below table provides

ranges* of control device operating

conditions

that were recorded during the two tests. The two performance

test scenarios

are as follows:
TEST

2 RUN #S DATE 1-3 10/16

15:35-19:35 4-6 10/17

09:40-13:57 TIME

LIME FEED RATE*** PERIOD** (LB/15-MIN) 2.0-3.9 4.6 -6.9

PRESSURE

LOSS (INCHES H20) 2.04 3.08 1.64 2.33 Ranges only see attached

CEM printouts

for complete

monitoring

data Test times. CEM times are approx. 6 minutes faster than times reflected

in stack test report. Fresh lime feed rate Total time feed rate (i. e. no recycled lime used)

Page 7 of 202RESULTS, CONCLUSIONS AND COMMENTS

A summary

of some pertinent

results appear in the preceding

RESULTS

SUMMARY.

For additional information

please consult the CALCULATIONS

and DATA SHEETS

sections

of this report.
Test ONE Runs 1,2,3 Stack velocity,

as determined

by US EPA method 2, was calculated

based upon the differential pressure measurement

of the impact and static sides of a Stauschiebe

type pitot tube at twelve different points in each of the two test ports. The resultant

mean stack velocity

of 44.13 feet per second fit/s) was multiplied

times the stack area of the test plane (19.15 ft •-) and by 60 (time conversion) to achieve a mean actual volumetric

flow rate of 46,189 cubic feet per minute (acfm). Prior to calculation

of the emission

rates, the ACFM value from each individual

run was adjusted to standard

conditions.

The mean standard

volumetric

flow rate was 37,749 scfm. Particulate emissions

were calculated

utilizing

the combined

net weights

of the filter catch and the residue from the front half rinse (nozzle, probe, cyclone bypass, and front half of filter assembly) and averaged

0.046 pounds

per hour (lbs/hr) with a concentration

of 1.00e -°4 grains per dry standard

cubic foot (gr/scfd).

There is no individual,

associated

particulate

allowable for this source. Hydrogen Fluoride

concentrations

were not detected

in the #1 test run. Emissions

of< 0.046 lbs/hr were calculated

using the detection

limit for run one and the values for runs two and three. This less than average is significantly

less than the allowable

of 2.25 lbs/hr. Hydrogen Chloride

concentrations

were detected

at a level between

the minimum

detection

limit and the limit of quantization

and averaged

0.079 lbs/hr. HC1 emissions

from the #1 Tunnel Kiln and #2 Tunnel Kiln (yet to be installed)

are required

to be no more than 2.25 lbs/hr.

Test TWO Runs 4,5,6 Stack velocity,

as determined

by US EPA method 2, was calculated

based upon the differential pressure measurement

of the impact and static sides of a Stauschiebe

type pitot tube at twelve different points in each of the two test ports. The resultant

mean stack velocity

of 42.04 feet per second fit/s) was multiplied

times the stack area of the test plane (19.15 ft •-) and by 60 (time conversion) to achieve a mean actual volumetric

flow rate of 48,300 cubic feet per minute (acfm). Prior to calculation

of the emission

rates, the ACFM value from each individual

run was adjusted to standard

conditions.

The mean standard

volumetric

flow rate was 36,651 scfm. Particulate emissions

were calculated

utilizing

the combined

net weights

of the filter catch and Page 8 of 202the

residue from the front half rinse (nozzle, probe, cyclone bypass, and front half of filter assembly) and averaged

0.038 pounds

per hour (lbs/hr) with a concentration

of 1.20e .°4 grains per dry standard

cubic foot (gr/scfd).

There is no individual,

associated

particulate

allowable for this source. Hydrogen Fluoride

concentrations

were not detected

in any of the test runs, field blank, or reagent blanks.

Emissions

of <0.007 lbs/hr were calculated

at the detection

limit for each run, significantly less than the allowable

of 2.25 lbs/hr. Hydrogen Chloride

concentrations

were detected

at a level between

the minimum

detection

limit and the limit of quantization

and averaged

0.038 lbs/hr. HC1 emissions

from the #1 Tunnel Kiln and #2 Tunnel Kiln (yet to be installed)

are required

to be no more than 2.25 lbs/hr.
Ms. DeAnna

Oser of the State of Georgia

Department

of Natural.Resources

requested

internal QA procedures

due to the very low reported

results from previous

testing. A detailed

description of a Blind spike and a second Source Standard

performed

for this request are reported

in the Enthalpy Analytical

Narrative

Summary.

The Blind spike had a calculated

percent recovery

of 98.2%. The Second Source standard

exhibited

a 97.1% tag value for HF and 98.1% tag value for HC1.

Page 9 of 202SAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL

PROCEDURES
Particulate/HC1/HF emissions

testing and analysis

were performed

according

to procedures developed by the U. S. Environmental

Protection

Agency

(USEPA)

and referred

to as Method 5/26A. Sampling

port locations

and number of test points to be used were determined

according to Method

1 and are shown in the data sheets section of this report. The above federal test methods appear in the Code of Federal Regulations

(Reference

1).
Test point locations

and sampling

port placement

for velocity

traverses

are shown in the data sheets. Test point locations

were calculated

based upon a 59.25" diameter,

round stack with 2 four inch test ports located ninety degrees apart. Twelve points were sampled

in each test port. An all glass US EPA method

5/26a sampling

train was utilized that employed

glass nozzles and probe liners. A glass filter assembly

held a Teflon filter frit with Teflon filter for determination

of particulate

emissions.

Connections

to the condenser train was a glass "double el" with a thermocouple

well for measurement

of exhaust temperature of the filter. The condenser

train consisted

of five glass impingers

connected sequentially. The first and second impingers

were charged with 100 ml 0.1 N H2SO4, the third and fourth with 100 ml of 0.1 N H•_SO 4. The fifth impinger

contained

300g of silica gel. All sample recovery

was conducted

on-site by Dan McCombs

and Kevin Adkins.

Condenser

train collections were measured

and rinsed into pre-labeled

amber glass jars. The sulfuric acid fractions were forwarded

t0 Enthalpy

Analytical,

Inc. a LELAP accredited

laboratory

(Certificate No. 04010, agency interest no. 85848).

A copy of Enthalpy's

accreditation

is included

in Appendix I. for determinations

of HCI,q-IF

via US EPA 26a. The sodium hydroxide

fractions
were discarded.
The front half of the sampling

train was rinsed with reagent grade acetone and stored in 500 ml Nalgene® bottles and transported

to ATC for analysis.

Liquid levels were marked on the sampling bottles with a marker.

Particulate

analysis

was completed

Analytical

Testing Consultants, Inc., a LELAP

accredited

laboratory

(Certificate

No. 04044)
A blank of the acetone reagent was collected

in the field, along with the field samples

and analyzed side by side. According

to standard

practices

and the QA/QC handbook

EPA-600/4-94- 038c, acetone blanks should not be subtracted

over 0.001%.

The acetone residue of 0.0004 was well under the maimum

allowable

residue of 0.0008.

Corrections

are show in the particulate

lab report.

Page 10 of 202•FERENCES

I.

CODE OF •DER•

REGULATIONS,

Title 40, Part 60; Appendix

A,. July 1, 2001.

Page t 1 of 202ISOKINETIC DATA

AND CALCULATIONS
TEST ONEEmission

Rate Calculations Particulate HC1HF Isokinetic Data and Calculation Moisture Data Isokinetic Sampling

Rate Data TEST TWOEmission

Rate Calculations Particulate HC1HF Isokinetic Data and Calculation Moisture Data Isokinetic Sampling

Rate Data Sample Calculations Nomenclature Calculation Formulae

Page 12 of 202PARTICULATE EMISSION

RATE

CALCULATION

LOCATION: Boral Bricks SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #1

DATADATE RUN TIME (min) Dn (in) An (ft2) A VG DH (in H20) P A TM (in Hg) Pm (in Hg) Ps (GAUGE) Ps (IN HG)Tm (F) Tm (R) Vm (ft3) Vm STD (ft3) VLQ (ml) VV STD (ft3) V STD (ft3)%MMDMWDMTs(F)Ts(R) SUM SQRT DPN DP A VG SQRT DPCP Vs (ft/s) Ds (in) As (ft2) QS, FLOW, ACFM Q STD (ft3/min) Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM WT (gm)%1%C02%02%C0%N2 PMRc (Ibs/hr) Cs (GR/SCFD)

Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 AVERAGE 10/16/02 10/16/02

10/16/02 60.00 60.00

60.00 0.250 0.250

0.250 3.41E-04 3.41E-04

3.41E-04 1,68 1.54

1.56 29.55 29.55

29.55 29.67 29.66

29.67 -0.54 -0.54

-0.54 29.51 29.51

29.51 94.38 87.31

81.60 554.05 546.98

541.27 43.94 40.91

40.93 42.94 40.48

40.93 43.00 44.00

44.60 2.03 2.07

2.10 44.97 42.56

43.03 ,4.51 ,4.87

4.88

4.76 0.955 0.951

0.951 28.94 28.94

28,93 28.44 28.40

28.40 ,205.63 ,206.29

207.67

206.53 665.30 665.96

667.34

666.20 16.87 16.30

16.48 24.00 24.00

24.00 0.70 0.68

0.69 0.84 0,84

0.84 44.94 43,46

43.99

44.13 59.25 59,25

59.25 19.15 19.15

19.15 51629 -49929

,50539

50699 ,40413 39044

39439

39632 ,38592 37141

,37513

37749 0.0007 0.0016

0.0025 104.23 102.10

102.21 1.00 1.00

1.00

1.00 .19.41 ,19.39

,19.37

19.39 0.00 0.00

0.00 79.59 79.61

79.63 0.083 0.194

0.303

0.194 0.0003 0.0006

0.0009

0.0006

Page 13 of 202HCI EMISSION

RATE

CALCULATION
LOCATION: Boral Bricks SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #1

DATA Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 AVERAGE DATE 10/16/02

10/16/02

10/16/02 RUN TIME (rain)

60.00

60.00

60.00 Dn (in)

0,250

0.250

0.250 An (ft2)

3.41E-04

3.41E-04

3.41 E-04 A VG DH (in H20)

1.68

1.54

1.56 P A TM (in Hg)

29.55

29.55

29.55 Pm (in Hg)

29.67

29.66

29.67 Ps (GAUGE)

-0.54

-0.54

-0.54 Ps (IN HG)

29.51

29.51

29.51 Tm (F)

94.38

87.31

81.60 Tm (R)

554.05

546.98

541.27 Vm (ft3)

43,94

40.91

40.93 Vm STD (ft3)

42.94

40.48

40.93 VLQ (ml)

43.00

44.00

44.60 VV STD (ft3)

2.03

2.07

2.10 V STD (ft3)

44.97

42.56

43.03 %M 4.51

4.87

4.88

4.76 MD 0.955

0.951

0.951 MWD 28.94

28.94

28.93 M 28.44

28.40

28.40 Ts (F)

205.63

206.29

207.67

206.53 Ts (R)

665.30

665.96

667,34

666.20 SUM SQRT DP

16.87

16.30

16.48 N DP

24.00

24.00

24.00 A VG SQRT DP

0.70

0.68

0,69 CP 0.84

0.84

0.84 Vs (ft/s)

44.94

43.46

43.99

44.13 Ds (in)

59.25

59.25

59.25 As(ft2) 19.15

19.15

19.15 QS, FLOW, ACFM

51629

49929

50539

50699 Q STD (ft3/min)

40413

39044

39439

39632 Q STD DRY, FLOWSCFM

38592

37141

37513

37749 WT (gm)

1.0660 E-03 2.8900E-04

6.2100E-04 %1 104.23

102.10

102.21 %C02 1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00 %02 19.41

19.39

19.37

19.39 %C0 0.00

0.00

0.00 %N2 79.59

79.61

79.63 PMRc(Ibs/hr) ,0.127

,0.035

0.075

0.079 Cs (GR/SCFD)

0.0004

0.0001

0.0002

0.0002

Page 14 of 202HF EMISSION

RATE

CALCULATION

LOCATION: Boral Bricks SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #1
DATA Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 AVERAGE DATE 10/16/02

10/16/02

10/16/02 RUN TIME (rain)

60.00

60.00

60.00 Dn (in)

0.250

0.250

0.250 An (ft2)

3.41E-04

3.41E-04

3.41 E-04 A VG DH (in H20)

1.68

1.54

1.56 P A TM (in Hg)

29.55

29.55

29.55 Pm (in Hg)

29.67

29.66

29.67 Ps (GAUGE)

-0.54

-0.54

-0.54 Ps (IN HG)

29.51

29.51

29.51 Tm (F)

94.38

87.31

81.60 Tm (R)

554.05

546.98

541.27 Vm (ft3)

43.94

40.91

40.93 Vm STD (ft3)

42.94

40.48

40.93 VLQ (ml)

43.00

44.00

44.60 VV STD (ft3)

2.03

2.07

2.10 V STD (ft3)

44.97

42.56

43.03 %M 4.51

4.87

4.88

4.76 MD 0.955

0.951

0.951 MWD 28.94

28.94

28.93 M 28.44

28.40

28.40 Ts (F)

205.63

206.29

207.67

206.53 Ts (R)

665.30

665.96

667.34

666.20 SUM SQRTDP

16.87

16.30

16.48 N DP

24.00

24.00

24.00 A VG SQRT DP

0.70

0.68

0.69 CP 0.84

0.84

0.84 Vs (ft/s)

44.94

43.46

43.99

44.13 Ds (in)

59.25

59.25

59.25 As(fl2) 19.15

19.15

19.15 QS, FLOW, ACFM

51629

49929

50539

50699 Q STD (ft3/min)

40413

39044

39439

39632 Q STD DRY, FLOWSCFM

38592

37141

37513

37749 WT(gm) 6.8800E-05

5.3200E-04

5.2800E-04 %1 104.23

102.10

102.21 %C02 1.0.0

1.00

1.00

1.00 %02 19.41

19.39

19.37

19.39 %C0 0.00

0.00

0.00 %N2 79.59

79.61

79.63 PMRc (Ibs/hr).

'< 0.008

0.065

0.064

0.046 Cs (GR/SCFD)

• 0.00002

0.00020

0.00020

0.0001

Page 15 of 202DATE SOURCE
Run #1 POINT #

ISOKINETIC

DATA

AND CALCULATIONS 10/16/O2 Tunnel Kiln #1

Tm K= 3.3869015 dp dH SQRT DP

% 02 A 1

86

204

0.560

1.90

0.748

19.3 A2 90.5

205

0.540

1.83

0.735

19.4 A3 95.5

205

0.540

1.83

0.735

19.5 ;44 98.5

206

0.550

1.86

0.742

19.4 A5 102.5

206

0.580

1.96

0.762

19.5 A6 100

207

0.550

1.86

0.742

19.3 A7 100.5

206

0.510

1.73

0.714

19.4 ;48 101.5

206

0.500

1.69

0.707

19.5 A9 102

206

0.470

1.59

0.686

19.3 A 10

100.5

206

0.450

1.52

0.671

19.4 ;4 11

101.5

205

0.450

1.52

0.671

19.5 A 12

95

203

0.380

1.29

0.616

19.4 B1 89.5

205

0.480

1.63

0.693

19.6 B2 90

207

0.510

1.73

0.714

19.6 B3 89.5

207

0.500

1.69

0.707

19.5 B4 90

207

0.500

1.69

0.707

19.4 B5 89.5

207

0.500

1.69

0.707

19.5 B6 92

207

0.500

1.69

0.707

19.4 B7 91

206

0.510

1.73

0.714

19.4 B8 90.5

206

0.510

1.73

0.714

19.3 B9 92.5

205

0.490

1.66

0.700 BIO 94.5

205

0.490

1.66

0.700 Bll 91

205

0.450

1.52

0.671 B12 91

203

0.370

1.25

0.608 94.38 Vm(ft3) 205.63 Initial

119.06 Final 163.00 Total 43.94

1.68

16.871

19.43 corrected per 6C-1

19.41 % N2 (BY DIFFERENCE• %Excess Air

Calibration Actual Gas Zero 0.0 Mid-Range 10.6 • 19.0

Calibration

Data Instrument Reading Pre- -Post

Pre0.2 0.2 0,95 10.7 10.7

0.48 19.2 n/a 0.95 Based upon 2% of span value (21%) % Error*

% C02

11
11
11111

1.0079.59 1215.00

-Post0.950.48n/a

Page 16 of 202DATE SOURCE
Run #2 POINT #

ISOKINETIC

DATA

AND CALCULATIONS 10/16/02 Tunnel Kiln #1

7"m 3,341dH SQRT DP

% 02 % C02
A 1

83.0

202

0.470

1.57

0.686

19.4 A2 86.5

205

0.490

1.64

0.700

19.3 A3 88.0

206

0.490

1.64

0.700

19.3 A4 87.5

206

0.490

1.64

0.700

19.5 A5 88.0

206

0.510

1.70

0.714

19.5 A6 89.0

207

0.440

1.47

0.663

19.5 A7 89.5

208

0.470

1.57

0.686

19.4 A8 87.0

208

0.430

1.44

0.656

19.4 A9 87.5

209

0.420

1.40

0.648

19.3 A 10

88.5

208

0.400

1.34

0.632

19.5 All 89.0

208

0.420

1.40

0.648

19.5 A 12

88.5

207

0.430

1.44

0.656 B1 86.5

206

0.470

1.57

0.686

19.2 B2 87.5

207

0.430

1.44

0.656

19.4 B3 87.0

206

0.500

1.67

0.707

19.4 B4 87.5

206

0.500

1.67

0.707

19.5 B5 87.5

206

0.490

1.64

0.700

19.6 B6 87.0

205

0.510

1.70

0.714

19.3 B7 87.0

206

0.500

1.67

0.707

19.4 B8 87.0

207

0.480

1.60

0.693 B9 87.5

207

0.460

1.54

0.678 BIO 86.5

207

0.450

1.50

0.671 B11 86,0

205

0.440

1.47

0.663 B12 86.5

203

0.390

1.30

0.624 87.31 Vm(ft3) 206.29 Initial

163.62 Final 204.53 Total 40.91

1.54

16.295

19.41 corrected per 6C- 1 19.39 % N2 (BY DIFFERENCE• %Excess Air

Calibration Actual Gas Zero 0.0 Mid-Range 10.6 Hi-Rang• 19.0 Based upon 2% of span value (21%) Calibration

Data Instrument Reading Pre- -Post

Pre0.2 0.2 0.95 10.7 10.7

0.48 n/a n/a n/a % Error*

1

1.00
79.61 1195.77

-Post0.950.48n/a

Page 17 of 202DATE SOURCE
Run #3 POINT #

ISOKINETIC

DATA

AND CALCULATIONS 10/16/02 Tunnel Kiln #1

Tm K= 3,3104673 dp dH SQRT DP

% 02 A 1

80.0

207

0.500

1.66

0.707

19.4 A2 80.5

208

0.510

1.69

0.714

19.4 A3 81.0

209

0,510

1.69

0.714

19.3 A4 82.0

209

0.520

1.72

0,721

19,3 A5 82.5

209

0.530

1.75

0.728

19.5 A6 83.5

208

0,470

1.56

0.686

19,5 A7 83.5

208

0.480

1.59

0.693

19.4 A8 83.5

210

0.470

1,56

0.686

19.6 A9 83.0

208

0.450

1.49

0,671

19.4 A 10

83.0

208

0.440

1.46

0,663

19,4 A 11

83.0

206

0.430

1.42

0.656

19.4 A12 83.0

206

0,360

1,19

0.600 B1 79.5

206

0.520

1.72

0.721

19.3 B2 80.0

206

0,560

1.85

0.748

19.3 B3 81.5

207

0.530

1.75

0.728

19.4 B4 82.0

207

0.510

1.69

0.714

19.5 B5 82.0

208

0.490

1.62

0.700

19.6 B6 82.0

208

0,430

1.42

0.656

19.6 B7 80.5

209

0.460

1.52

0,678 B8 80.5

209

0.440

1.46

0.663 B9 81.0

208

0,450

1.49

0.671 BIO 80.5

208

0.450

1.49

0.671 Bll 80.0

206

0.440

1.46

0.663 B12 80.5

206

0.390

1,29

0.624 81.60 Vm(ft3) 207.67 Initial

204.66 Final 245.59 Total 40.93

1.56

16.477

19.43 corrected per 6C-1

19.37 % N2 (BY DIFFERENCE• %Excess Air

Calibration Actual Gas Zero 0.0 Mid-Range 10. 6 H R a n_.n_.n_.n_.n_.n_•

19,0

Calibration

Data Instrument Reading Pre- -Post

Pre0.2 0.1 0.95 10.7 10.7

0.48 n/a n/a n/a Based upon 2% of span value (21%) % Error*

% C02

1

1.00
79.63 1173.04

-Post0.480.48n/a

Page 18 of 202MOISTURE DATA

Run #1

1st Imp.

2nd Imp.

3rd Imp. 4th Imp. BEGINNING 100.00

100.00

200.00

300.00 ENDING 114.00

108.00

204.00

317.00 NET 14.00

8.00

4.00

17.00 TOTALS

43.0

Run #2

1st Imp.

2nd Imp.

3rd Imp. 4th Imp. BEGINNING 100.00

100.00

200.00

300.00 ENDING 118.00

104.00

204.00

318.00 NET 18.00

4.00

4.00

18.00 TOTALS

44

Run #3

1st Imp.

2nd Imp.

3rd Imp. 4th Imp. BEGINNING 100.00

100.00

200.00

300.00 ENDING 117.00

104.00

205.00

318.60 NET 17.00

4.00

5.00

18.60 TOTALS

44.6

Page 19 of 202ISOKINETIC SAMPLING

RATE

CALCULATION

dH KdP K (846.72*Dn^4*dH

@*Cp^2"(1

-Bw)^2*Md*Tm,Ps)/(Ms,Ts,Pm)
Run #1 Run #2 Run #3 Dn 0.250

0.250

0.250 dH@ 1.87

1.87

1.87 Y, gamma factor

1.03

1.03

1.03 Cp 0.84

0.84

0.84 Bw(FRA CTION, NOT%)

0.05

0.05

0.05 Md 29.00

29.00

29.00 Pbar 29.55

29.55

29.55 PS (GAUGE)

-0.54

-0.54

-0.54 Ps 29.51

29.51

29.51 Tm, F

90.00

95.00

90.00 Tm, R

549.67

554.67

549.67 Ms 28.45

28.45

28.45 Ts, F

190.00

205.00.

205.00 Ts, R

649.67

664.67

664.67 Pm 29.66

29.66

29.66 K 3.3869

3.3406

3.3105 TERMINOLOGY Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR

WEIGHT =Md(1-Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR

WEIGHT

(29) OR =(0.44*%CO2)+(0.32*%O2)+(0.28*(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK

STATIC PRESSURE

(IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE

(IN. Hg) Pm=METER ABSOLUTE

PRESSURE

(IN. Hg) Pbar + (avg dH/13.6)

Page 20 of 202PARTICULATE EMISSION

RATE

CALCULATION

L OCA TION: Boral Bricks SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #1
DATA Run #4 Run #5 Run #6 AVERAGE DATE 10/17/02

10/17/02

10/17/02 RUN TIME (min)

60.00

60.00

60.00 Dn (in)

0,250

0.250

0.250 An (ft2)

3.41E-04

3.41 E-04 3.41E-04 A VG DH (in H20)

1.44

1.47

1.36 P A TM (in Hg)

29.64

29.64

29.64 Pm (in Hg)

29.75

29.75

29.74 Ps (GAUGE)

-0.54

-0.54

-0.54 Ps (IN HG)

29.60

29.60

29.60 Tm (F)

78.33

74.27

86.33 Tm (R)

538.00

533.94

546.00 Vm (ft3)

39.14

39.91

38.82 Vm STD (ft3)

39.49

40.57

38.58 VLQ (ml)

33.60

31.70

32.50 VV STD (ft3)

1.58

1.49

1.53 VSTD(ft3) 41.07

42.07

40.12 %M 3.86

3.55

3.82

3.74 MD 0.961

0.964

0.962 MWD 28.93

28.93

28.94 M 28.51

28.54

28.52 Ts (F)

203.25

202.83

202.75

202.94 Ts (R)

662.92

662.50

662.42

662.61 SUM SQRT DP

15.95

16.12

15.52 N DP

24.00

24.00

24.00 A VG SQRTDP

0.66

0.67

0.65 CP 0.84

0.84

0.84 Vs (fYs)

42.29

42,70

41.14

42.04 Ds (in)

59.25

59.25

59.25 As(ft2) 19.15

19.15

19.15 QS, FLOW, ACFM

48579

49056

47265

48300 Q STD (ft3/min)

38279

38678

37271

38076 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM

36802

37304

35847

36651 WT (gin)

0.0018

0.0035

0.0038 %1 100.50

101.88

100.82 %C02 1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00 %02 19.30

19.31

19.44

19.35 %C0 0.00

0.00

0.00 %N2 79.70

79.69

79.56 PMRc (Ibs/hr)

0.222

0.426

0.467

0.372 Cs (GR/SCFD)

0.0007

0.0013

0.0015

0.0012

Page 21 of 202HCI EMISSION

RATE

CALCULATION

L OCA TION: Boral Bricks SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #1

DATA Run #4 Run #5 Run #6 AVERAGE DATE 10/17/02

10/17/02

10/17/02 RUN TIME (rain)

60.00

60.00

60.00 Dn (in)

0.250

0.250

0.250 An (ft2)

3.41E-04

3.41E-04

3.41E-04 AVG DH (in H20)

1.44

1.47

1.36 P ATM (in Hg)

29.64

29.64

29.64 Pm (in Hg)

29.75

29.75

29.74 Ps (GAUGE)

-0.54

-0.54

-0.54 Ps (IN HG)

29.60

29.60

29.60 Tm (F)

78.33

74.27

86.33 Tm (R)

538.00

533.94

546.00 Vm (ft3)

39.14

39.91

38.82 Vm STD (ft3)

39.49

40.57

38.58 VLQ (ml)

33.60

31.70

32.50 VV STD (ft3)

1.58

1.49

1.53 V STD (ft3)

41.07

42.07

40.12 %M 3.86

3.55

3.82

3.74 MD 0.961

0.964

0.962 MWD 28.93

28.93

28.94 M 28.51

28.54

28.52 Ts (F)

203.25

202.83

202.75

202.94 Ts (R)

662.92

662.50

662.42

662.61 SUM SQRT DP

15.95

16.12

15.52 N DP

24.00

24.00

24.00 A VG SQRT DP

0.66

0.67

0.65 CP 0.84

0.84

0.84 Vs (ft/s)

42.29

42.70

41.14

42.04 Ds (in)

59.25

59.25

59.25 As (ft2)

19.15

19.15

19.15 QS, FLOW, ACFM

48579

49056

47265

48300 Q STD (ft3/min)

38279

38678

37271

38076 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM

36802

37304

35847

36651 WT (gm)

3.3200E-04

2.5000E-04

3.5500E-04 %1 100.50

101.88

100.82 %C02 1.00

1.00

1.00

1.00 %02 19.30

19.31

19.44

19.35 %C0 0.00

0.00

0.00 %N2 79.70

79.69

79.56 PMRc (Ibs/hr)

0.041

0.030

0.044

0.038 Cs(GR/SCFD) 0.00013

0.00010

0.00014

0.00012

Page 22 of 202HF EMISSION

RATE

CALCULATION

LOCATION: Boral Bricks SOURCE: Tunnel Kiln #1
DATA Run #4 Run #5 Run #6 AVERAGE DATE 10/17/02

10/17/02

10/17/02 RUN TIME (rain)

60.00

60.00

60.00 Dn (in)

0.250

0.250

0.250 An (fi2)

3.41E-04

3.41E-04

3.41E-04 A VG DH (in H20)

1.44

1.47

1.36 P ATM (in Hg)

29.64

29.64

29.64 Pm (in Hg)

29.75

29.75

29.74 Ps (GAUGE)

-0.54

-0.54

-0.54 Ps (IN HG)

29.60

29.60

29.60 Tm (F)

78.33

74.27

86.33 Tm (R)

538.00

533.94

546.00 Vm (ft3)

39.14

39.91

38.82 Vm STD (ft3)

39.49

40.57

38.58 VLQ (ml)

33.60

31.70

32.50 VV STD (ft3)

1.58

1.49

1.53 V STD (ft3)

41.07

42.07

40,12 %M 3.86

3.55

3.82

3,74 MD 0,961

0,964

0.962 MWD 28.93

28.93

28.94 M 28.51

28.54

28.52 Ts (F)

203.25

202.83

202.75

202.94 Ts (R)

662.92

662.50

662.42

662.61 SUM SQRT DP

15.95

16.12

15.52 N DP

24.00

24.00

24.00 A VG SQRT DP

0.66

0.67

0.65 CP 0.84

0.84

0.84 Vs (ft/s)

42.29

42.70

41.14

42.04 Ds (in)

59.25

59.25

59.25 As (ft2)

19.15

19.15

19.15 QS, FLOW, ACFM

48579

49056

47265

48300 Q STD (ft3/min)

38279

38678

37271

38076 Q STD DRY, FLOW SCFM

36802

37304

35847

36651 WT(gm) 5.3800E-05

5.2900E-05

5.4000E-05 %1 100.50

101.88

100.82 %C02 1,00

1.00

1.00

1.00 %02 19.30

19.31

19.44

19.35 %C0 0.00

0.00

0.00 %N2 79.70

79.69

79.56 PMRc (Ibs/hr)

4, 0.007

'< 0.006

< 0.007

• 0.007 Cs (GR/SCFD)

<• 0.00002

• 0.00002

•" 0.00002

•" 0.00002

Page 23 of 202DATE SOURCE
Run #4 POINT #

ISOKINETIC

DATA

AND CALCULATIONS

I 0/17/02 Tunnel Kiln #1

Tm K= 3.2502907 dp dH SQRT DP

% 02
A 1

80

199

0.410

1.33

0.640

19.7 A2 80

201

0.430

1.40

0.656

19.6 A3 80.5

205

0.450

1.46

0.671

19.6 A4 81

202

0.470

1.53

0.686

19.6 A5 81

203

0.470

1.53

0,686

19.6 A8 81.5

203

0.480

1.56

0.693

19.5 A7 82

203

0.460

1.50

0.678

19.5 A8 82

204

0.460

1.50

0.678

19.6 A9 82

204

0.430

1.40

0.656

19.5 A 10

82

204

0.410

1.33

0.640

19.5 A 11

82

202

0.400

1.30

0.632

19.7 A 12

82.5

203

0.380

1.24

0.616 B1 77

204

0.460

1.50

0.678

19.7 B2 76.5

205

0.460

1.50

0.678

19.6 B3 76

205

0.470

1.53

0.686

19.6 B4 75.5

205

0.470

1.53

0.686

19.4 B5 75.5

205

0.490

1.59

0,700

19.3 B6 75

205

0.500

1.63

0.707

19.3 B7 75

204

0.450

1.46

0.671

19.1 B8 75.5

204

0.430

1.40

0.656

19.2 B9 75.5

203

0.440

1.43

0.663

19.2 BIO 74

203

0.420

1.37

0.648

19.2 B11 74

202

0.410

1.33

0.640

19.5 B12 74

200

0.360

1.17

0.600 78.33 Vm(ft3) 203.25 Initial

245.92 Final 285.06 Total 39.14

1.44

15.945

19.48 corrected per 6C- 1 19.30 % N2 (BY DIFFERENCE• %Excess Air

Calibration Actual Gas Zero 0,0 Mid-Range 10.6 Hi-Ran__g• 19.0

Calibration

Data Instrument Reading Pre- -Post

Pre0.0 0 0.00 10.7 10.7

0.48 19.2 n/a 0.95 Based upon 2% of span value (21%) % Error* % C02
1
11

1

1

1111111

1.0079.70 1104.60

-Post0.000.48n/a

Page 24 of 202DATE SOURCE
Run #5 POINT #

ISOKINETIC

DATA

AND CALCULATIONS 10/17/O2 Tunnel Kiln #1

Tm K•

3.250dH SQRT DP

% 02 % C02 A 1

69.5

204

0,460

1.50

0.678

19.3 A2 69.5

204

0,470

1.53

0.686

19.6 A3 71.5

204

0.480

1.56

0.693

19.6 A4 74.0

204

0.510

1.66

0.714

19.6 A5 75.0

204

0.510

1.66

0.714

19.5 A6 74.5

204

0.510

1.66

0.714

19.5 A7 74.0

205

0.480

1.56

0.693

19.4 A8 73.5

205

0.460

1.50

0.678

19.5 A9 74.0

205

0.420

1.37

O. 648

19.5 A 10

73.5

204

0.400

1.30

0.632

19.6 All 73.5

203

0.380

1.24

0.616

19.7 A 12

74.5

203

0.360

1.17

0.600 B1 73.5

202

0.450

1.46

0.671

19.5 B2 75.0

203

0.470

1,53

0.686

19.4 B3 75.0

203

0.490

1.59

0.700

19.3 B4 75.0

203

0.500

1.63

0.707

19.4 B5 74.5

203

0.500

1.63

0.707

19.3 B6 75.5

202

0.480

1.56

0.693

19.4 B7 76.5

202

0.430

1.40

0.656

19.5 B8 76.5

201

0.440

1.43

0.663

19.5 B9 76.5

200

0.450

1.46

0.671

19.3 BIO 77.5

200

0.440

1.43

0.663

19.2 Bll 75.0

200

0.400

1.3O

0.632

19.3 B12 75.0

200

0.360

1.17

0.600 74.27 Vm(ft3) 202.83 Initial

285.18 Final 325.09 Total 39,91

1.47

16.116

19.45 corrected per 6C- 1 19. 31 % N2 (BY DIFFERENCE• %Excess Air

Calibration Actual Gas Zero 0,0 Mid-Range 1 0.6 • 19.0

Calibration

Data Instrument Reading Pre- -Post

Pre0.0 0.1 0.00 10.7 10.7

0.48 n/a n/a n/a Based upon 2% of span value (21%) % Error*

111
11

1

1

1.00

•.• 1116.43

-Post0.480.48n/a

Page 25 of 202DATE SOURCE
Run #6 POINT #

ISOKINETIC

DATA

AND CALCULATIONS 10/17/02 Tunnel Kiln #1

Tm K= 3,2502907 dp dH SQRT DP

% 02 A 1

84.0

201

0.430

1.40

0.656

19.5 A2 84.5

202

0.430

1.40

0.656

19.6 A3 86.0

202

0.460

1.50

0.678

19.6 A4 86.5

203

0.470

1.53

0.686

19.6 A5 87.0

203

0.470

1.53

0.686

19.5 A6 87.0

203

0.470

1.53

0.686

19.6 A 7

86.0

203

0.440

1.43

0.663

19.6 A8 86.0

203

0.410

1.33

0.640

19.4 A9 85.0

203

0.390

1.27

0.624

19.4 A 10

85.5

204

0,390

1.27

0.624

19.5 A 11

85.0

204

0.380

1.24

0.616

19.7 A 12

85.0

204

0.340

1.11

0.583 B1 82.5

201

0.490

1.59

0.700

19.4 B2 84.5

203

0.450

1.46

0.671

19.5 B3 85.5

204

0.440

1.43

0.663

19.5 B4 85.5

205

0.450

1.46

0.671

19.6 B5 85.5

205

0.450

1.46

0.671

19.4 B6 86.5

205

0.410

1.33

0.640

19.5 B7 87.0

204

0,420

1.37

0.648

19.7 B8 88.5

204

0.410

1.33

0.640

19.6 B9 89.0

203

0.420

1,37

0.648

19.6 BIO 89.5

202

0.400

1.30

0.632 Bll 89,5

197

0.360

1.17

0.600 B12 91.0

198

0.290

0.94

0.539 86.33 Vm(ft3) 202.75 Initial

325.72 Final 364.54 Total 38.82

1.36

15.522

19.54 corrected per 6C-1

19.44 % N2 (BY DIFFERENCE• %Excess Air

Calibration Actual Gas Zero 0.0 Mid-Range 10.6 Hi-Rang• 19.0

Calibration

Data % C02

1.•
79.• 1243.•

Instrument Reading

% Error* Pre- -Post

Pre-

-Post 0.1 0.1 0.48

0.48 10.7 10.7

0.48

0.48 n/a n/a n/a

n/a 11

1

1
1

Based upon 2% of span value (21%)

Page 26 of 202MOISTURE DATA

Run #4 BEGINNING ENDINGNET

lstlmp.

2ndlmp.

3rdlmp.

4• Imp. 100.00 100.00

200,00

300°00 112.00 108.00

205.00

308.60 12.00 8.00

5.00

8.60 TOTALS

33.6

Run #5
BEGINNING ENDINGNET

lstlmp.

2ndlmp.

3rdlmp.

4• Imp. 100.00 100.00

200.00

300.00 117.00 105,00

204.00

305.70 17.00 5.00

4.00

5.70 TOTALS

31.7

Run #6
BEGINNING ENDINGNET

lstlmp.

2ndlmp.

3rdlmp.

4• Imp. 100.00 100.00

200.00

300.00 116.00 104.00

204.00

308.50 16.00 4.00

4.00

8.50 TOTALS

32.5

Page 27 of 202ISOKINETIC SAMPLING

RATE

CALCULATION

dH KdP K (846.72*Dn^4*dH

@*Cp^2"(1

-Bw)^2*Md*Tm*Ps)/(Ms*Ts*Pm)
Run #4 Run #5 Run #6 Dn 0,250

0.250

0.250 dH@ 1.87

1.87

1.87 Y, gamma factor

1.03

1.03

1,03 cp 0.84

0.84

0.84 Bw(FRACTION•NOT%) 0.05

0.05

0.05 Md 29.00

29.00

29.00 Pbar 29.64

29.64

29.64 PS (GAUGE)

-0.54

-0.54

-0.54 Ps 29.60

29.60

29.60 Tin, F

80.00

80.00

80.00 Tm, R

539.67

539.67

539.67 Ms 28.45

28..45

28.45 Ts, F

205.00

205.00

205.00 Ts, R

664,67

664.67

664.67 Pm 29.75

29.75

29.75 K 3.2503

3.2503

3.2503 TERMINOL OG ¥ Ms=APPARENT STACK GAS MOLECULAR

WEIGHT =Md(1 -Bw)+18Bw Md=DRY GAS MOLECULAR

WEIGHT

(29) OR =(0.44*%CO2)+(0.32*%O2)+(0.28*(%N2+%CO)) Ps GAUGE=STACK

STATIC PRESSURE

(IN. H20) Ps=ABSOLUTE STACK PRESSURE

(IN. Hg) Pro=METER ABSOLUTE

PRESSURE

(IN. Hg) Pbar + (avg dH/13.6)

Page 28 of 202SAMPLE CALCULATIONS Boral Bricks Augusta, GA Run #1 1) ABSOLUTE

PRESSURE

IN DRY GAS METER Pm= P ATM + AVG DH/13.6

P ATM

Avg. DH

Pm

T STDP STD

29.55 1.68 2) ABSOLUTE

STACK PRESSURE Ps P ATM + Ps(GAUGE)/13.6

29.67

P ATM Ps(GAUGE)

Ps
29.55 -0.54

29.51 3) SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD

CONDITIONS VM STD (VM)*(Y)*(T

STD/TM)*(PM/P

STD)

Vm Tm

Y

Vm STD
43.94 554.05

1.034

42,94

ft3 4) VOLUME OF WATER COLLECTED,

CORRECTED

TO STANDARD

CONDITIONS VV STD VV STDw + VVSTDsg

VV S'EDw (.002673)*(VLQw)*(T

STD/P STD) VV STDsg (.002668)*VLQsg)*(T

STD/P STD)

WHERE 0.002673

0.04707 FT3/ML*IN.

HG/17.64 DEG. R. WHERE 0.002668

0.04715 FT3/G*IN.HG/17.64

DEG. R. VLQ (w) VLQ (sg)

VV STD
26.00 17,00

2.03 ft3 5) TOTAL SAMPLE VOLUME AT STANDARD

CONDITIONS V STD Vm STD + VV STD 44.97 ft3 6) PERCENT

MOISTURE

IN STACK GAS %M (100)*(VV STD)/V STD 4,51% 7) MOLE FRACTION

OF DRY GAS MD (100-%M)/100 0.955 528 DEG R. 29.92 IN. HG

Page 29 of 202SAMPLE CALCULATIONS

7A) MOLECULAR

WEIGHT OF THE DRY GAS

MWD (%CO2*0.44)+(O2*0.32)+((%CO+%N2)*0.28)

%CO2 %02

%CO

%N2

MWD
1.00 19.41

0.00

79.59

28.94 8) MOLECULAR

WEIGHT OF THE WET GAS M (MWD)*(MD)

+ 18(1-MD) 28.44

WHERE 18 MOLECULAR

WEIGHT OF WATER, G/G-MOLE 9) STACK VELOCITY VS (85.49)*(CP)*((TS/(PS)(M))^1/2*((SUM SQRT DP)/N DP))

where 85.49 ff/sec* [Ib/Ib-mole*in.Hg)/(deg.

R'in H20)]^0.5

CP Ts (R) SUM SQRT

N DP VS 0.84 665.30

16.87

24 44.94 10) STACK VOLUMETRIC

FLOW RATE QS (60)*(VS)*(AS)

AS (inlet) QS 19.15 51629 11) STACK VOLUMETRIC

FLOW RATE, STANDARD

CONDITIONS

INCLUDING

MOISTURE Q STD Q STD DRY/MD 40413 12) STACK VOLUME FLOW RATE STANDARD

CONDITIONS

DRY Q STD DRY= 17.647*60*Md*Vs*A*(Ps/Ts(R)) 38592 13) POLLUTANT

MASS RATE, CONCENTRATION

BASIS PMRC (. 1323)*(WT)*(Q

STD)/V STD WHERE 0.1323 COMBINED

CONVERSION

FACTOR (60 MIN/HR*0.00220

LBS/GRAM) WT(GRAMS) PMRC 0.0007 0.083 14) PERCENT

ISOKINETIC %1 (0.09450*Ts*Vm

std)/(Ps*Vs*An*Time*Md) Run Time Area of Nozzle 60 3.41E-04 %1 104,23 15) CONCENTRATION,

GPJSCFD Cs= 15.43 gr/gm WT/Vm STD Cs 0.0003

Page 30 of 202