alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3208 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the timing of deposits 

relating to the Civil Service Retirement System with respect to crediting 

military service, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2015 

Mr. O’ROURKE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To amend title 5, United States Code, to clarify the timing 

of deposits relating to the Civil Service Retirement System with respect to crediting military service, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Retired Civil Servant 

5 Military Service Restoration Act of 2015’’. 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3208 IH

1 SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE MILITARY SERVICE DEPOSIT UNDER 

2 CIVIL SERVICE RETIREMENT SYSTEM. 

3 (a) TIMING OF DEPOSIT.—Section 8334(j) of title 5, 

4 United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 

5 following: 

6 ‘‘(6)(A) A deposit described under paragraph (1) may 

7 be made by an employee or Member at any time before 

8 or after the date of separation on which the entitlement 

9 to any annuity under this subchapter is based. 

10 ‘‘(B) With respect to a deposit made after such date 

11 pursuant to subparagraph (A)— 

12 ‘‘(i) the deposit shall include interest computed 

13 in accordance with subsection (e); and 

14 ‘‘(ii) the annuity or lump-sum payable after 

15 such deposit is made shall include interest computed 

16 in accordance with this subchapter.’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

18 subsection (a) shall apply with respect to any employee 

19 or Member (as such terms are defined in section 8331 of 

20 title 5, United States Code) who retires on or after Sep21 tember 8, 1982. 

22 (c) RETIREMENT COUNSELING.—Section 8350(c)(1) 

23 of such title is amended by striking ‘‘title, and’’ and insert24 ing ‘‘title, shall ensure that employees and Members who 

25 served in the Armed Forces are made aware of crediting 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3208 IH

1 military service pursuant to sections 8332 and 8334 of 

2 this title, and’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of the construction of the Will of Anna H. Levine, Deceased.

Surrogate’s Court, New York County,

February 7, 1958.

*161*Warshaw <& Franks*for Chemical Corn Exchange Bank, as executor, petitioner.

*Joseph A. Brust,*special guardian for Jonathan B. Rubin and others, infants, respondents.

*Abraham Maranov*for Bernard Rubin and others, respondents.

5. Samuel Di Falco, S.

The will of the testatrix directs that her executor provide for the perpetual care of a cemetery plot which is described in the will as “ my family cemetery plot (known as Section 2, Block 13, Lot T) ixx New Montefiore Cemetery ”. At the date of her death the testatrix was the owner of two cemetery plots, one of which consisted of 24 graves and was located in section 2, block 13 of the cemetery named in the will. The other plot owned by the testatrix was in a different part of this cemeteiy and does not meet the description given in the will. There has been no interment in either of these plots.

Question as to the applicability of the testamentary provision for perpetual care arises because the testatrix was interred in a plot which had been owned by her predeceased husband and where he and his daughter are interred. This plot is in section 2, block 13 of the cemetery referred to in the will but neither this plot nor the plot in section 2, block 13 in the testatrix’ name either constituted or contained Lot T and the reference in the will to Lot T is inexplicable.

The undisputed facts in the petition and account herein are that the testatrix had paid annual charges for the care of the plot where her husband was interred, that she had discussed the perpetual care of that plot with the cemetery authorities and that there is every indication that she regarded this plot as her ‘ ‘ family cemetery plot ’ ’. Such designation was not inappropriate in view of the rights granted by law to the testatrix in respect of any plot owned by her husband (Membership Corporations Law, § 84; Religious Corporations Law, § 8; General Municipal Law, § 163) and it is concluded that testatrix intended by her will to provide perpetual care of the plot where her husband was interred.

The amount to be expended for perpetual care is to be determined by the executor pursuant to the express authority granted in the will axxd not by this court. In view of the lack of opposi*162tion to the proposed expenditure stated in the petition and citation herein, the decree to be made will authorize such payment.

The executor will be authorized to abandon the securities stated in the account to be worthless. The legacies bequeathed to infants are to be delivered to the duly appointed guardian, or guardians, of the property of such infants.

The fee of the attorneys for the executor will be fixed upon their submission of an affidavit of legal services, which may be done in conjunction with the settlement of a decree or prior thereto.

Submit decree on notice.
H. R. 322 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 16105 

Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, as the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher 

Post Office’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SGT. ZACHARY M. FISHER POST OFFICE. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 16105 Swingley Ridge Road in Chesterfield, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. 

Fisher Post Office’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Sgt. Zachary M. Fisher Post Office’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 139 (Monday, July 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 42395]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17122]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Release Airport Property From Quitclaim Deed; 
Venice Municipal Airport, Venice, FL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA hereby provides notice of intent to release 
approximately 48 acres of airport property at Venice Municipal Airport, 
Venice, FL, from the conditions, reservations, and restrictions as 
contained in a Quitclaim Deed agreement between the FAA and the City of 
Venice, FL, dated June 10, 1947. The release of property will allow the 
City of Venice to dispose of the property for other than aeronautical 
purposes. The property is located at 2350 Scenic Drive along the 
Intracoastal Waterway Canal. The parcel is currently designated as non-
aeronatutical land use. The property will be released of its federal 
obligations for municipal land use. The fair market value of this 
parcel has been determined to be $475,000.

DATES: Comments are due on or before August 20, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review at Venice Municipal 
Airport, 150 Airport Ave. E, Venice FL 34285; and the FAA Airports 
District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 
32822. Written comments on the Sponsor's request must be delivered or 
mailed to: Marisol C. Elliott, Program Manager, Orlando Airports 
District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 400, Orlando, FL 
32822-5024. Documents reflecting the Sponsor's request are available 
for inspection by appointment only at Venice Municipal Airport and by 
contacting the FAA at the address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marisol C. Elliott, Program Manager, 
Orlando Airports District Office, 5950 Hazeltine National Drive, Suite 
400, Orlando, FL 32822-5024.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 125 of The Wendell H. Ford Aviation 
Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21) requires the 
FAA to provide an opportunity for public notice and comment prior to 
the ``waiver'' or ``modification'' of a sponsor's Federal obligation to 
use certain airport land for non-aeronautical purposes.

    Issued in Orlando, Florida, on July 15, 2014.
Bart Vernace,
Manager, Orlando Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2014-17122 Filed 7-18-14; 8:45 a.m.]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                    | /s/ Jack                L. Howard |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|   | Jack                L. HowardChief                Operating Officer and Secretary(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)November 6, 2008 |

----
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00570

- CR

Tommy Shawn RIECK

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5851W

Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED October 9, 2013.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez

, Justice
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12557]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for temporary display in the exhibition “Caspar David Friedrich: The Soul of Nature” at The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Scott D. Weinhold,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2024-22329 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

DAVID PAYET,

Appellant,

v.

Case No. 5D22-1080 

LT Case Nos. 2018-CF-036581

 2018-CF-036781-A 

 2018-CF-029819 

STATE OF FLORIDA, 

Appellee. 

________________________________/

Decision filed October 11, 2022 

3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court 

for Brevard County, 

Tesha Ballou, Judge. 

David Payet, Cocoa, pro se. 

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Pamela J. Koller, 

Assistant Attorney General, Daytona 

Beach, for Appellee. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED.

WALLIS, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
```

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 182 (Thursday, September 19, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76890]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21365]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE

Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal ServiceTM.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: September 19, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
September 12, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a 
USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 328 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-666, CP2024-675.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2024-21365 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
```
EXHIBIT 32.2



     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
                TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Possis Medical, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Eapen Chacko, Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                     /s/ Eapen Chacko
                                     --------------------------------
                                     Eapen Chacko
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     October 12, 2004




                                       66
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Michel Mayer, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Freescale Semiconductor
Holdings I, Ltd., certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



|(1) | the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 28, 2007 (the Quarterly Report), which this statement accompanies fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) for the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m) and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I,
Ltd.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This certificate is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906.

Dated: October 30, 2007



/s/ MICHEL MAYERMichel MayerChairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,Freescale Semiconductor Holdings I, Ltd.
In The 

Court of Appeals 

Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-16-00187-CR 

EX PARTE LEROY ALVARADO 

 

On Appeal from the 121st District Court 

Terry County, Texas 

Trial Court No. 6758-A, Honorable Kelly G. Moore, Presiding 

 

May 20, 2016 

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

 

Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. 

Appellant, Leroy Alvarado, appearing pro se, attempts to appeal the trial court’s 

order on his application for post-conviction writ of habeas corpus in a felony case. We 

dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

In January 2015, appellant pleaded guilty, pursuant to a plea bargain, to theft of 

property valued less than $1,500,1enhanced to a third-degree felony.2 Appellant was 

sentenced to five years confinement, with the term of confinement suspended and 

appellant placed on community supervision for a period of five years, and a $1,500 fine. 

 

1

TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 31.03(a), (e)(4)(D) (West Supp. 2015).

2

TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 12.425(a) (West Supp. 2015).
2

In February 2016, appellant pleaded true to the State’s motion to revoke probation. The 

trial court revoked his community supervision and sentenced him to three years 

confinement. Appellant subsequently filed an application for writ of habeas corpus in 

the trial court. On March 8, 2016, the trial court issued an order on the application for 

writ of habeas corpus, finding that there were no controverted, previously unresolved 

facts material to the legality of appellant’s confinement. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC.

ANN. art. 11.07, § 3(c) (West 2015). The trial court recommended denial of appellant’s 

application for writ of habeas corpus and ordered the district clerk to immediately 

transmit the application, any answers filed, and a copy of the order to the Court of 

Criminal Appeals.

Appellant filed this appeal on April 26, 2016. By letter dated May 3, 2016, we 

notified appellant that it did not appear we had jurisdiction and directed him to file a 

response by May 16, 2016, showing grounds for continuing the appeal or the appeal 

would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant filed a response, but did not show 

how this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal.

Jurisdiction to grant post-conviction habeas corpus relief in felony cases rests 

exclusively with the Court of Criminal Appeals. Padieu v. Court of Appeals of Tex., Fifth 

Dist., 392 S.W.3d 115, 117 (Tex. Crim. App. 2013) (per curiam). Post-conviction writs 

of habeas corpus in felony cases must be filed in the court in which the conviction was 

obtained. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, § 3 (West 2015). The trial court

must make any necessary findings of fact and then forward the application for writ of 

habeas corpus, its findings, and the record to the Court of Criminal Appeals for a final 

ruling on the application. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 11.07, §§ 3, 5 (West 
3

2015). Accordingly, this Court has no jurisdiction over appellant’s application for writ of 

habeas corpus.

Therefore, we dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.