alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023273EN.01000101.xml

| 2.8.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 273/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 273/1

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10996 – ICG / SCOPELEC / SETELEN)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 273/01)

On 4 April 2023, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in French and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (https://competition-cases.ec.europa.eu/search). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10996. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32023M10996. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Exhibit 23



            Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



The Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Porta Systems Corp.
Syosset, New York


      We hereby consent to the  incorporation  by reference in the  Prospectuses
constituting a part of the Registration  Statements (Reg. No. 333-68321) on Form
S-8 and (Reg.  No.  333-72369)  on Form S-8 of our report  dated March 25, 2005,
relating to the  consolidated  financial  statements of Porta Systems Corp.  and
subsidiaries  appearing in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2004. Our report contains an explanatory  paragraph regarding
the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.



                                                   /s/ BDO Seidman, LLP
                                                   --------------------

                                                   BDO SEIDMAN, LLP


Melville, New York
March 28, 2005
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2724 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 10, 2015 

Mr. MCKINLEY (for himself, Mr. JOHNSON of Ohio, Mr. BARR, Ms. 

DEGETTE, and Mr. LOEBSACK) introduced the following bill; which was 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize 

hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reliable Investment 

5 in Vital Energy Reauthorization Act’’ or the ‘‘RIVER 

6 Act’’. 

7 SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES. 

8 Section 242(g) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

9 U.S.C. 15881(g)) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the fisVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:55 Jun 13, 2015 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\H2724.IH H2724

SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2724 IH

1 cal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fis2 cal years 2016 through 2025’’. 

3 SEC. 3. HYDROELECTRIC EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT. 

4 Section 243(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

5 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the fis6 cal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fis7 cal years 2016 through 2025’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### SPECIA PLUMBING *&*HARDWARE CO. v. GULF REFINING CO.

No. 9065.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. San Antonio.

May 10, 1933.

Rehearing Denied May 24, 1933.

Hertzberg & Kercheville, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Bert B. Thompson and C. A. Risien, both of San Antonio, for appellee.

SMITH, Justice.

The Gulf Refining Company undertook to fully equip an automobile service station at Main avenue and Cypress street, in the city of San Antonio, for the use of E. I. Burns in distributing the products — oil, gas, and the like — of the refining company, which engaged the Speeia Plumbing & Hardware Company, a partnership, to install such equipment. The Speeia Company put in the improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications furnished it by the Gulf Company, but it transpired that the equipment so placed was not workable, requiring its rearrangement The local manager and local agent of the Gulf Company, working together and alternately, •as in the case of the original employment of the Speeia Company, procured the latter to proceed and reconstruct the improvements under the modified specifications, at an admitted expense of $136. The Gulf Company ■afterwards repudiated the obligation, and resisted the Speeia Company’s cross-action thereon. The trial court, without the intervention of a jury, 'denied recovery to the :Specia Company, which has appealed.

The trial court erred. The record shows conclusively, so that reasonable minds cannot differ thereon, that appellant made the original improvements in accordance with its contract with appellee, and reconstructed the same at the instance of appellee, upon the latter’s well-implied promise to pay therefor. Appellant was therefore entitled! to recover of appellee on that promise.

The judgment will be reversed, but, as the case may be susceptible of further proof, the cause will be remanded for another trial.

Reversed and remanded.
#### JENKINS v. STATE.

No. 19953.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 30, 1938.

*998' G. H. Williamson, of Stephenville, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The conviction is for unlawfully transporting whisky in a dry area; penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for 90 days.

The statement of facts accompanying the record cannot be considered for the reason that it does not hear the approval of the judge before whom the case was tried. See Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St. arts. 2239, 2243; Vernon’s Ann.C.C.P. art. 760, subd. 2.The statement of facts is in question and answer form and therefore cannot be considered by this court. See art. 760, supra; also Piner v. State, 131 Tex.Cr.R. 266, 97 S.W.2d 953.

In the absence of bills of exception, as well as a statement of facts which can be considered, nothing is presented for review which would justify a reversal of the conviction.

The judgment is affirmed.
# Official Journal C 279/20 J

| | ISSN 1977-091X |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 279 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 6520 July 2022 |

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 279

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 6520 July 2022

---

| Contents | page |
| --- | --- |
| | IV   Notices |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Parliament |
| 2022/C 279/01 | Report on budgetary and financial management – Section I: European Parliament – Financial year 2021 | 1 |

Contents

page

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Parliament

2022/C 279/01

Report on budgetary and financial management – Section I: European Parliament – Financial year 2021

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
Exhibit 12-2

                  PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARY COMPAINES
                COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                   SEC METHOD
                                     ($000)

                                                          12 Months
                                                            Ended
                                                          12/31/96

NET INCOME                                                $517,205

ADD BACK:

-INCOME TAXES:
     OPERATING INCOME                                     $343,105
      NON-OPERATING INCOME                                 ($3,004)
      NET TAXES                                           $340,101


-FIXED CHARGES:
     TOTAL INTEREST                                       $366,360
      ANNUAL RENTALS ESTIMATE                               $8,789
      TOTAL FIXED CHARGES                                 $375,149
EARNINGS REQUIRED FOR PREFERRED DIVIDENDS:
      DIVIDENDS ON PREFERRED STOCK                         $18,036
      ADJUSTMENT TO PREFERRED DIVIDENDS*                   $11,860
                                                           $29,896

FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED DIVIDENDS                     $405,045
EARNINGS BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND FIXED CHARGES          $1,232,455
RATIO OF EARNINGS TO COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND
         EARNINGS REQUIRED FOR PREFERRED DIVIDENDS            3.04
EXHIBIT 10.5

[YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION LOGO]                PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL

                                                     INTER-OFFICE CORRESPONDENCE

TO:   Business Unit Executive

FROM:

DATE:
RE:   Senior Management Incentive Plan (SMIP)

I am pleased to inform you that you have been approved by the Board of Directors
to participate in the Senior Management Incentive Plan (SMIP) portion of the
Company's 2002 Incentive Compensation Plan for the ______ fiscal year. Please
refer to the 2002 Incentive Compensation Plan for more details on the plan
description and policies.

For the _____ fiscal year, your incentive compensation will be based on the
following performance goals:

      1.    York International Earnings per Share (EPS)

      2.    York International Cash Flow

      3.    Business Unit EBIT $

      4.    Business Unit Return on Net Capital Employed (RONCE)

There are three levels of achievement for each goal. The achievement level will
be linearly pro-rated based on actual results.

<PAGE>

Goals and respective payout as a percentage of base salary is listed below ($ in
millions except EPS):

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                          THRESHOLD        TARGET       MAXIMUM      WEIGHTING FACTOR
-------------------       ---------        ------       -------      ----------------
<S>                       <C>              <C>          <C>          <C>
EARNINGS PER
SHARE (EPS) for               $               $            $
York International*

Percent of Base               %               %            %                %
Salary to be paid

CASH FLOW for York            $               $            $
International*

Percent of Base               %               %            %                %
Salary to be paid

BUSINESS UNIT
EBIT $                        $               $            $

Percent of Base               %               %            %                %
Salary to be paid

BUSINESS UNIT
RONCE%**                      %               %            %

                              %               %            %                %
Percent of Base
Salary to be paid             %               %            %                %

 Incentive Amount             %               %            %                %
</TABLE>

*ONLY PAYABLE IF 85% OF BUSINESS UNIT EBIT$ TARGET IS ACHIEVED

**ONLY PAYABLE IF BUSINESS UNIT EBIT$ AT LEAST AT THRESHOLD

Distribution of the amount earned under the SMIP will be made after the results
for fiscal year ____ have been audited. The actual timing, amounts and
individual distribution of those amounts are predicated upon actual performance,
and are ultimately approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of
Directors. In the event of death, disability, retirement or termination, other
than for cause, payments will be prorated for the time of employment. If you
voluntarily leave the company or are terminated for cause prior to the end of
the year, any incentive payment will be forfeited.

Targets are confidential information and may not be communicated outside of the
Company, and should only be discussed internally on a need-to-know basis.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# TIME AND DATE: 

Monday, September 30, 2024, at 3 p.m. EST.

# PLACE: 

Washington, DC, at U.S. Postal Service Headquarters, 475 L'Enfant Plaza, SW.

# STATUS: 

Closed.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

## Meeting of the Board of Governors

### Monday, September 30, 2024, at 3 p.m. EST

1. Strategic and Financial Matters.

2. Administrative Items.

*General Counsel Certification:*                     The General Counsel of the United States Postal Service has certified that the meeting may be closed under the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Michael J. Elston, Secretary of the Board of Governors, U.S. Postal Service, 475 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20260-1000. Telephone: (202) 268-4800.

Michael J. Elston,

Secretary. 

[FR Doc. 2024-22039 Filed 9-23-24; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|          |   |                    |
|---------------|--------|-------------------------|
|          |   |                    |   |
| June 24, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Ezzie Goldish       |   |
|          |   | Ezzie Goldish           |   |
|          |   | Chief Financial Officer |   |
|          |   |                    |   |
i.q

IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

MCALLEN DI\ASION ENTERED

02n2t2015

IN RE:

JAMES HOWARD MAPLES; fdba

GLOBAL TOURS & CHARTERS, et al

Debtor(s)

JAMES HOWARD hIAPLF.S, et al

PIaintiff(s)

vs.

JOHNITIY PARTAIN, et al

Defendant(s)

CASE NO: 05-70128

CHAPTER 11

$

$

$

$

$

s

$

$

$ ADVf,RSARY NO. 0s-7009

$

$

s

ORI}ER REOPENING ADYERSARY PROCEEDING

1, This adversary proceeding is reopened for the purpose of enforcing the Court's judgment

and orders.

2. The Estate of James Maples is authorized to file a motion seeking to hold Johnny Partain

in civil contempt.

3. If the Estate files such a motion prior to February 18, 2015, the motion must be

calendared for a hearing at the United States Courthouse in McAllen, Texas at 9:00 a.m.

onMarch 24,2015.

4. The motion, and a notice of the March Z4thheaingo must be served by the Maples Estate

on Mr. Partain. A certificate of service must be filed.

5. Mr. Partain may fite an answer to any motion for contempt, with the answer to be filed

not later thanT days before the hearing.

The burden of proof at the hearing willbe on the Maples Estate.

Exhibit and witness lists must be filed not later than March 20,2014at noon, with service

on the opposing party to be done by email or hand delivery by that deadline.

SIGNED Februarv 1 l. 2015.

6.

7.

UNITED STATES BANKRTIPTCY JUDGE

tl1

54444023104012

EXHIBIT B
OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY 

AND POLLUTION PREVENTION 

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

RE: OPP meets with Thiophanate Methyl (TM) and Carbendazim (MBC) Taskforce to discuss 

registration review data needs.

List of Documents 

 

1. Meeting Summary Page 1 

2. Meeting Sign in Sheet Page 2 

 

Meeting Summary 

Wednesday May 7, 2014, representatives from AD, EFED, HED, PRD and RD met with taskforce 

representatives from Troy Corporation (technical registrant for MBC), Nisso (technical registrant for TM), and 

Gowan (technical registrant for TM) to discuss the data needs identified in the preliminary work plan (PWP) for 

TM and MBC. This meeting, requested by the task force, aimed to clarify the specific TM and MBC uses that 

triggered the registration review data needs. The PWP for TM and MBC published for a 60 day comment period 

on March 27, 2014. The Task Force pointed out that a number of uses of TM/MBC are minor or are not 

marketed. As a result, the taskforce indicated that they would consider discontinuing minor and non-marketed 

products in order to negate the Agencies need for some of the data requirements identified in the PWP.
#### Ex parte WIGGS.

No. 14395.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 22, 1931.

E. B. O’Quinn, of Marfa, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for tbe State.

CHRISTIAN, J.

After a bearing on a writ of habeas corpus, relator was remanded to tbe custody of tbe sheriff. Hence this appeal.

Relator was convicted in tbe county court of Brewster county on April 9, 1930, on a complaint and information charging him with tbe offense of swindling. On tbe 16th day of tbe same month motion for new trial was overruled and notice of appeal given. In an opinion by this court delivered February 18, 1931, judgment of conviction was affirmed. In affirming tbe judgment, this court expressly held that tbe information upon which tbe conviction was based was sufficient. See Clarence Wiggs v. State of Texas, 36 S.W.(2d) 765, delivered February 18, 1931. Motion for rehearing being filed, this court, in an opinion delivered March 25, 1931, overruled tbe motion. See opinion on motion for rehearing, Clarence Wiggs v. State of Texas, 36 S.W.(2d) 765, delivered March 25, 1931. On tbe 27th day of March, 1931, this court duly issued its mandate to tbe county coprt of Brewster county, and thereafter, on tbe 2d day of April, 1931, tbe clerk of tbe county court of Brewster county issued a capias pro fine for the arrest of relator. On tbe 4th day of April, 1931, relator made application to tbe judge of tbe county court of Brewster county for a writ of habeas corpus. Tbe writ having been awarded, tbe sheriff answered that relator was held under a capias pro fine issued by tbe clerk of tbe county court after tbe mandate from this court bad been received.

Tbe specific contention of relator is that tbe complaint and information failed to charge an offense, and that, therefore, tbe county court was without jurisdiction to render judgment against him. As hereinbefore stated, tbe complaint and information were held sufficient by this court on tbe appeal from the judgment of conviction. Relator now seeks to use tbe writ of habeas corpus to appeal from tbe judgment this court has already affirmed. A writ of habeas corpus cannot serve tbe purpose of an appeal. Branch’s Annotated Texas ’ Penal Code, sec. 239; Ex parte Wells, 111 Tex. Cr. R. 443, 14 S. W.(2d) 1027; Ex parte Evans, 109 Tex. Cr. R. 231, 4 S.W.(2d) 67; Ex parte Burford, 70 Tex. Cr. R. 281, 156 S. W. 686.

Tbe judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

Tbe foregoing opinion of tbe Commission of Appeals has been examined by tbe Judges oí tbe Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

---

|FP 81 |  | 391735 |  | September 1, 2008 |  | 28S |  | 25E
|----- |  | ------ |  | ----------------- |  | --- |  | ---
|      |  |        |  |                   |  |     |  |    
|FP 83 |  | 391736 |  | September 1, 2008 |  | 28S |  | 25E
|      |  |        |  |                   |  |     |  |    
|FP 85 |  | 391737 |  | September 1, 2008 |  | 28S |  | 25E
|      |  |        |  |                   |  |     |  |    

---

---

---

---
No. 72-6200.

#### Varner *v.*California.

Ct. App. Cal., 4th App. Dist. Certiorari denied.
EX-10.3



 Exhibit 10.3 

Director’s Appointment Letter 
 Date:
November 3, 2017 
 Cuiwei Ye 
 Hailiang
Building, No. 1508 Binsheng Rd. 
 Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province 

People’s Republic of China 
 Dear Mr. Cuiwei Ye:

 We write to confirm your appointment to the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of Hailiang Education Group Inc. (the
“Company”), effective November 3, 2017. Your appointment is made subject to the terms of the memorandum and articles of association of the Company, as amended from time to time (including the resolutions concerning your appointment)
(“Charter Documents”) and this appointment letter. 
  

	 	1.	Expense Reimbursement. The Company will reimburse you for all reasonable travel, accommodation and other related expenses to the fullest extent permitted under the Charter Documents. 


We set out in Annex A the address, fax and telephone numbers to be entered in the Register of Directors and for service of notice of Board meetings of
the Company. We should be grateful if you would confirm these details, or amend the same setting out the correct address, fax and telephone numbers. 

Please confirm you agree to serve in the capacity set forth above and the contact details set out below by signing this document as indicated below and
returning it to the Company’s registered office. 
 Yours sincerely, 
  

			
	Hailiang Education Group Inc.
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Ming Wang

	Name:	 	Ming Wang
	Title:	 	Chairman of the Board and CEO


  
 [Director Appointment
Letter] 








 Annex A 

Details of Appointment 
  

			
	Name	    	Cuiwei Ye
		
	Address	    	
		
	Telephone Number	    	
		
	Fax Number	    	
		
	Email Address	    	


  
 [Director Appointment
Letter]