alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79968]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22503]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request; 
Participatory Research and Indigenous Leadership in Research Evaluation

ACTION: Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Science Foundation (NSF) published a document in 
the Federal Register of September 25, 2024, concerning a request for 
public comment on the Participatory Research and Indigenous Leadership 
in Research Evaluation. In the description of the Principles for 
Conducting Research in the Arctic, one principle was omitted.

Corrections

    In the Federal Register published September 25, 2024, in FR Doc. 
2024-21973 (Filed 9-24-24), on page 78345, at the top of the second 
column, please include ``Respect Indigenous knowledges'' before 
``Effective Communication.''
    All other details remain unchanged.

    Dated: September 26, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024-22503 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
Order f

il ed August 21

, 2 0 1 8

I n T h e



### C o u r t of A p p e a l s

F o r The



### F irst D i s tr i ct o f T e x a s

N O. 01

- 1 8

- 00 5 99

- C R

JOSE RUPERTO ALANIZ

, A ppellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On A ppe a l from the 3 0th Di s t r i ct C o u r t

W i tchita Co unt y , Te x a s

Tr i a l C o urt C a u s e N o

. 55,523

- A



### O R D E R

T h i s c ou r t h a s d e t er

m in e d

, p u r s u a n t t o T e x a s R ul e o f Ap p e l l a t e P r o c e d u re

34

. 5 (f) a n d 34

. 6 ( g ) ( 2)

, t h a t i t m us t i n s p e c t t h e o r

i g i n a l o f State ’s Exhibit No. 83, a

DVD of surveillance video from State West, admitted in the t rial h e l d o n April 1 7

,

2 0 18

.T h e e xh i b i t c l e r k o f th e 3 0 th D i s t r i ct C o u rt i s d i re c t ed t o d e li v er t o t h e

C l e r k o f t h i s C o u r

t t h e o r i gi n al o f State’s Exhibit No. 83, a DVD of surveillance

video from State West, admitted in the jury trial held on April 1 7 , 2 0 18

, o n o r be f o r e

August 31

, 2 01 8

. T h e C l e r k o f th i s C ou r

t i s d i re c t e d t o r ece i v e, m a in t a i n

, a n d k e e p

s afe this o r ig i n al e x hi b i t ; t o d e li v er i t t o t h e j u s t i ces o f t h i s c ou r t f o r t h e i r i n s p e c t i on ;

a n d

, u po n c o m

pl e t io n o f i ns p e c t i on

, t o r e t u rn t h e o r i gi n al o f State ’s Exhibit No. 83

,

t o t h e c l e r k o f t h e 3 0 th D i s t

r i c t C o u r t

.

P E R C U RI A M

2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Treasury

###### Office of Foreign Assets Control

# AGENCY:

Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) is publishing the names of one or more persons that have been placed on OFAC's Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List) based on OFAC's determination that one or more applicable legal criteria were satisfied. All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of these persons are blocked, and U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. OFAC is additionally updating the entries on the SDN List for one vessel.

# DATES:

                        See                         **SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION**                         section for effective date(s).                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

OFAC: Associate Director for Global Targeting, tel.: 202-622-2420; or Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance & Evaluation, tel.: 202-622-2490.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Electronic Availability

                    The SDN List and additional information concerning OFAC sanctions programs are available on OFAC's website (                    *https://ofac.treasury.gov/​*).                

## Notice of OFAC Action

On September 18, 2024, OFAC determined that the property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the following persons are blocked under the relevant sanctions authority listed below.
      ( print page 78981)          ( print page 78982)          ( print page 78983)          ( print page 78984)    
      ( print page 78985)    
Lisa M. Palluconi,

Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. Department of the Treasury.

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-P

[FR Doc. 2024-21975 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810-AL-C
#### PITTSBURG NAT. BANK v. GOSS.

No. 3261.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

Jan. 27, 1938.

Engledow & Guest, of Pittsburg, for plaintiff in error.

B. E. Goss, of Winnsboro, for defendant in error.

O’QUINN, Justice.

We shall refer to plaintiff in error as plaintiff, and defendant in error as defendant, that being their attitude in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendant in the county court of Camp county, Tex., to recover on a promissory note in the sum of $200. The note was dated March 21, 1932, bore interest at the rate of 10 per cent, per an-num from and after October 1, 1931, and provided for 10 per cent, additional if collected by legal proceedings or if placed in the hands of an attorney for collection.

Defendant answered by general demurrer and general denial.

The case was tried to the court without a jury, and judgment was rendered for defendant. The pleading nor the evidence showed a legal defense against the action to recover.

Judgment should have been for plaintiff. Accordingly, the judgment is reversed and judgment here rendered for plaintiff in the sum of $338.42, principal $200, interest $107.66, and attorney’s fee $30.76. Reversed and rendered.

.WALKER, C. J., recused.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

BENEFICIAL CONSUMER DISCOUNT

COMPANY D/B/A/ BENIFICIAL

MORTGAGE COMPANY OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PAMELA A. VUKMAN A/K/A PAMELA A. MCDEAVITT,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 221 WAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 29th day of November, 2022

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

February 13, 2007

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

No. 06-1828

ILLINOIS ONE NEWS, INC.

doing business as The Gift Spot, 

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

CITY OF MARSHALL, ILLINOIS,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United

States District Court 

for the Southern 

District of Illinois.

No. 04-cv-4055-JPG

J. Phil Gilbert, 

Judge.

Order

The slip opinion of this court issued on February 13, 2007, 

is amended as follows:

Page 4, third line from the bottom, change “nimby” to 

“NIMBY”.
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of report (date of earliest event reported): April 19, 2007
 NOBLE CORPORATION
 (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
 Cayman Islands(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization)
    
    001-31306(Commission file number)
    
    98-0366361(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
 13135 South Dairy Ashford, Suite 800
Sugar Land, Texas(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77478(Zip code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code: (281) 276-6100
  o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR
240.13e-4(c))




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  ITEM 2.02.      Results of Operations and Financial Condition.ITEM 9.01.      Financial Statements and Exhibits.SIGNATURESINDEX TO EXHIBITSPress Release    Table of Contents  FORM 8-K
 
 ITEM 2.02.      Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
   
 ITEM 9.01.      Financial Statements and Exhibits.
  Exhibit 99.1
    
    Noble Corporation Press Release dated April 19, 2007, announcing
the financial results for the quarter ended March 31, 2007.
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



FORM 8-K
 
 SIGNATURES
  NOBLE CORPORATIONDate:  April 19, 2007
    By:
    /s/ THOMAS L. MITCHELLThomas L. Mitchell,Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer, Treasurer and Controller 3




---



##### Table of Contents



INDEX TO EXHIBITS
 Exhibit No.
    
    DescriptionExhibit 99.1
    
    Noble Corporation Press Release dated April 19, 2007,
announcing the financial results for the quarter ended March
31, 2007.
[No. 18638-5-III.

Division Three.

December 26, 2000.]

#### The State of Washington, *Respondent,*v. Joshua Seth Romero, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Yakima County, No. 99-1-00544-4, Robert N. Hackett, Jr, J., entered July 23, 1999. *Affirmed*by unpublished opinion per Sweeney, J., concurred in by Brown, A.C.J., and Schultheis, J.
U.S. Deportment 

o f Transportation 

Federal Aviation 

Administration 

JAN 0 8 2016 

Mr. Rafael Gustavo Fassina Marques 

Airworthiness Office 

Embraer S.A. 

A v. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2.170 

12227-901 - S.J. dos Campos- SP 

Brasil 

Dear Mr. Marques: 

Transport Airplane Directorate 

1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. 

Renton. Washington 98057-3356 

We have received your petition letter number GCF-1933/2015, dated November 13, 2015, 

on behalf ofEmbraer S.A., to extend the time limit of exemption no. 10974 to January 15, 

2017. That exemption, from§§ 25.562(a) at Amendment 25-64 and 25.785(b) at 

Amendment 25-88, of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, and from FAA Special 

Conditions 25-495-SC, number 2(e), provides to Embraer an exemption from the lower-leg 

flai l requirements for the forward-most seat position on all side-facing seats on Embraer 

Model EMB-550 and EMB-545 airplanes, serial numbers 1 through 55; and provides a 

timeframe within which Embraer must develop a comprehensive compliance plan and 

schedule for subsequent airplanes. 

Your request is located in docket no. F AA-20 13-0810 in regulations.gov. 

The FAA has reviewed your petition to extend exemption no. 10974. The current exemption 

requires Embraer to submit a monthly status report. The last status report the FAA had 

received was dated October 2015. Therefore, Embraer is currently out of compliance with 

the existing exemption. Please note that Embraer must submit monthly status reports as 

required by the exemption. 

The FAA submitted to Embraer, on October 21 , 2015, the stage 2 issue paper for the legflail airbag. As of this letter, Embraer has not submitted a response to the issue paper 

regarding their position. Embraer must submit their position to this issue paper before the 

FAA can begin processing the subject exemption time-limited extension. 

Before we can process your petition, we require more information. 

1. How many airplanes have been delivered in accordance with the current exemption? 

2. When will airplane serial number 55 be delivered? 

3. How many additional airplanes are scheduled to be delivered under the new 

proposed exemption time-limit extension (if extended to December 31 , 20 16)? 
If you have questions, please contact Jayson Claar at 425-227-2194, or at 

jayson.claar@faa.gov. 

Sincerely, 

uzanne asterson 

Manager, Airframe and Cabin Safety Branch, ANM-115 

Transport Standards Staff
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelby Acquisition I, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2008 as filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, James
      R. Kerr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                James R. KerrJames
                R. KerrPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerJune
                16, 2008
# Official Journal C 211/2013

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.211.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 211 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5625 July 2013 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.211.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 211

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5625 July 2013

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 211/01 | Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6866 — Time Warner/CME) (1) | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 211/01

Non-opposition to a notified concentration (Case COMP/M.6866 — Time Warner/CME) (1)

1

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2013/C 211/02 | Euro exchange rates | 2 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2013/C 211/02

Euro exchange rates

2

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 323 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2015 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and 

Governmental Affairs 

AN ACT 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, Missouri, as 

the ‘‘Sgt. Amanda N. Pinson Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 323 RFS 

1 SECTION 1. SGT. AMANDA N. PINSON POST OFFICE. 

2 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

3 Postal Service located at 55 Grasso Plaza in St. Louis, 

4 Missouri, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Sgt. 

5 Amanda N. Pinson Post Office’’. 

6 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg7 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

8 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

9 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Sgt. Amanda N. 

10 Pinson Post Office’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2015. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### Frank Iarossi, Plaintiff, *v.*Philip E. Roberts, Defendant.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Albany County,

May 28, 1958.

*Morton M. Z. Lynn*for defendant.

*David Rosenfeld*for plaintiff.

Harry E. Schlbick, J.

This is a motion by the defendant for summary judgment. The complaint is based upon breach of contract to remove a quantity of earth and fill from certain land purchased by the plaintiff from the defendant. The plaintiff alleges that the defendant agreed to remove ‘ ‘ all such earth and fill and to put the land into condition for building thereon immediately at the defendant’s sole expense and before the sale and conveyance of said land.”

The written contract of sale is dated August 8, 1955. Title closed on September 13. No agreement such as here alleged is contained in the contract.

According to the complaint the promise to remove the fill was one of the considerations for the agreement to purchase the property. As such, it has a standing similar to the agreement to convey the property. The complaint seeks to add a consideration in addition to that set forth in the written contract. The parol evidence rule bars such attempt. *(Mitchill*v. *Lath,*247 N. Y. 377.)

The motion is granted.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3273 

To prohibit assistance to Iran to develop, use, or protect any technology 

or other assets of Iran’s nuclear program, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 29, 2015 

Mr. GARRETT introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and in addition to the Committee on Armed 

Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in 

each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

A BILL 

To prohibit assistance to Iran to develop, use, or protect 

any technology or other assets of Iran’s nuclear program, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Prohibiting Assistance 

5 to Nuclear Iran Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3273 IH

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON ASSISTANCE TO IRAN TO DE2 VELOP, USE, OR PROTECT ANY TECHNOLOGY 

3 OR OTHER ASSETS OF IRAN’S NUCLEAR PRO4 GRAM. 

5 (a) PROHIBITION.—No funds available to any Fed6 eral department or agency may be used to provide assist7 ance to Iran to develop, use, or protect any technology 

8 or other assets of Iran’s nuclear program. For purposes 

9 of this subsection, the term ‘‘assistance’’ shall be deemed 

10 to include the use of the Armed Forces of the United 

11 States. 

12 (b) WAIVER.—The President may waive the prohibi13 tion on the use of funds to provide assistance to Iran 

14 under subsection (a) on a case-by-case basis if— 

15 (1) the President determines and submits to 

16 Congress a certification that it is necessary to 

17 United States national interests to do so; and 

18 (2) not later than the end of the 5-day period 

19 beginning on the date on which such certification is 

20 submitted under paragraph (1), there is enacted a 

21 joint resolution stating in substance that Congress 

22 approves of such certification of the President. 

23 (c) COMPUTATION OF PERIOD OF TIME.—The period 

24 of time described in subsection (b)(2) shall be computed 

25 without regard to— 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3273 IH

1 (1) the days of which either House of Congress 

2 is not in session because of an adjournment of more 

3 than 3 days to a day certain or an adjournment of 

4 the Congress sine die; and 

5 (2) any Saturday and Sunday, not excluded 

6 under paragraph (1), when either House of the Con7 gress is not in session. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
#### In the Matter of Jewish Secondary Schools Movement, Petitioner, against Conference of Jewish Material Claims Against Germany, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County,

May 1, 1958.

*Harry Torcqyner*for petitioner.

*Leo Gusik, Maurice M. Boukstein*and *William Massar*for respondent.

William C. Heoht, Jr., J.

Petitioner seeks an order annulling a specified meeting of respondent’s board of directors and the decisions made at said meeting, and requiring that a meeting of respondent’s board of directors be held in England. Respondent has cross-moved to dismiss the petition as a matter of law.

It is not disputed that petitioner is not a member of respondent or an officer or director thereof. Petitioner is a separate organization which was set up for the purpose of creating and maintaining religious schools in Great Britain and Northern Ireland.

Respondent receives funds, as a result of an agreement made between the State of Israel and respondent’s assignor organization with the Federal Republic of Germany, to be used for relief and rehabilitation of Jewish victims of Nazi persecution.

In 1955 and 1956 respondent allotted certain sums from the fund to petitioner. However at the meeting which respondent held in January, 1957 its board of directors decided not to take any action on petitioner’s new application for continuance of support.

Petitioner bases its right to the relief requested on the ground that it is a direct beneficiary to whom funds should be allocated by respondent, which as the successor organization with whom the Federal Republic of Germany made the agreement for the disbursal of funds, assumed obligations for the benefit of beneficiaries, a majority of whom are located outside the State of New York.

*359Respondent asserts, and correctly so in my opinion, that petitioner has no standing to question the regularity or propriety of the change in place of the meeting of respondent's board of directors or of any action taken or decisions made at such meeting.

There is no merit to petitioner’s contention that its right to maintain this action is derived from its status as a beneficiary. Petitioner does not allege that it is a party to or named in the *“*Protocol” which provides for the use of funds for rehabilitation of *“*Jewish Victims of National-Socialist persecution according to the urgency of their needs ’ ’ as determined by respondent’s assignor. Petitioner is not a *cestui que*trust, nor does the *“*Protocol ” create a trust.

I agree with respondent, that even if it be assumed that respondent holds the funds which it receives, in trust, it is still obligated to allocate the funds among recipients *“*according to the urgency of their needs as determined by respondent ”.

It is not too difficult to envision the harassing litigations to which respondent could be subjected if it were to be held that a person who or an organization which might become a recipient of the benefits of the funds here were to be entitled to maintain an action such as petitioner has initiated.

Petitioner’s application is therefore denied and the cross motion to dismiss the petition is granted.