alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 267 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 267

  To amend the Peace Corps Act to allow former volunteers to use the 
 seal, emblem, or name of Peace Corps on death announcements and grave 
                                stones.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 9, 2015

  Mr. Sires introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Peace Corps Act to allow former volunteers to use the 
 seal, emblem, or name of Peace Corps on death announcements and grave 
                                stones.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Respect for Peace Corps Volunteers 
Act''.

SEC. 2. USE OF OFFICIAL SEAL, EMBLEM, AND NAME OF THE PEACE CORPS.

    Subsection (b) of section 19 of the Peace Corps Act (22 U.S.C. 
2518) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (1), by inserting before the period at the 
        end the following: ``, except that the official seal or emblem 
        and the name `Peace Corps' may be used on any death 
        announcement, gravestone, plaque, or other grave marker of any 
        person who served as a volunteer or applicant for enrollment as 
        a volunteer under such rules as may be prescribed by the 
        Director''; and
            (2) in paragraph (2), in the first sentence, by inserting 
        ``or in accordance with the exception specified in paragraph 
        (1),'' before ``shall be fined''.
                                 <all>
```
From: Hirsch, Bruce R [mailto:Bruce.R.Hirsch@bge.com]  

Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:16 PM

To: 'Richard Parker'; Alex Hofmann; Andrew Delaski; Aris Marantan; Art Rosenfeld; Bob Saint; Brian

Coffey; Bruce Smith; Caitlin Johnson; Carlos Gaytan; Caskey, John; Charlie Drexler; Charlie Stevens; Chris

Bolduc; Clark Silcox; Creevy, Jim; Dan Cohen; Daniel Young; Eric Peterson; Freeman, Jeremiah; Gary

Fernstrom; Greg Coulter; Greg Rosenquist; James Lass; Jennifer Tiedeman; Jerry Corkran; Jerry Hodge;

Jerry Schoen; Joanna Mauer; John Cymbalsky; John Rossetti; Katie Coughlin; Ken Winder; Mahesh P.

Sampat; Matt Miller; Matthew Nardotti; Meg Waltner; Meyers, Aaron; Michael Hyland; Michael Rivest;

Millure, Dave; Phil Harter; Phil Hopkinson; Polinski, Raymond; Puesh Kumar; Rick Anderson; Rob

Greeson; Robert Berman; Robert van Buskirk; Robin Roy; Ryan, Paul; Scott Beck; Simmons, Chuck; Steve

Nadel; Steve Rosenstock; Tim Ballo; Tom Eckman; Wes Patterson; Zhimei Luo

Cc: Hirsch, Bruce R

Subject: RE:Amorphous Core Experience at BGE

Importance: High

This is just a single Company’s experience with amorphous core transformers. Please note that based on

this data we have NOT ruled out using amorphous steel in our transformers, however, the numbers are

troubling.  

BGE owns 2,770 transformers with amorphous steel cores. Most are three phase units purchased in the

mid to late 80’s.

Of that number, 201 have failed in service. The cause of failure is not known but to be considered a

failure the probability is that either the core or coil failed. This represents an 7% failure rate.  

The average age of the failed amorphous core transformers is 10.97 years.

The average age of failed transformers for BGE’s entire fleet is 29.4 years.  

BGE has over 216,000 transformers in the fleet, thus the quantity of amorphous core transformers

represents 1.4% of the total.

While we could debate the cause of failure for any particular class or design of transformer, the average

age to failure date is a good apples to apples comparison of the performance of the transformers since

the exact same criteria was used across the board.   
Hope this information, along with other user responses is helpful in the decision making process.  

                                                                                                                                                                Bruce

>>> This e‐mail and any attachments are confidential, may contain legal,

professional or other privileged information, and are intended solely for the

addressee.  If you are not the intended recipient, do not use the information

in this e‐mail in any way, delete this e‐mail and notify the sender. CEG‐IP2
DEPARTMOTOF 

^RANSPOMION 

JCKET OPERATIONS 

Stuart S. MacPherson FAA Docket No. CP10WP00p6 .,,p ^-j p y-7 ^ 

P.O. Box 807 DMSNo.FAA-2010-0538 20!0AUb^J }^ £.- c 

Cardiff, Ca. 92007 

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, Administrative Law Judge w ~ "" '-"^ ' ' ' • fe— * ^ 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation AUG H 2010 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. , ^„ . ^, . , -^ r...— oL^PT 

East Building Ground Floor, Room E12-320 H E: AM i n b IJOwf\ b 1 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Judge Goodwin, 

This letter is in response to my receipt of a letter dated July 30'*', 2010, outlining a 

motion to deem admitted, allegations filed in FAA docket #CP10WP0006, DMS No. 

FAA-2010-0538. 

Upon submitting my request for a hearing June 21*', 2010,1 assumed that in the act of 

requesting a hearing I had conveyed my intention to argue the facts alleged in the 

complaint. I subsequently learned in the Procedural Order dated July 14"', 2010, and 

received by me on July 27"*, that it was necessary for me to respond to the complaint by 

filing an answer to said allegations. 

Now that I am aware of this requirement I wish to reply to each numbered paragraph 

of the complaint by stating that I am without sufficient knowledge or information to 

admit to or deny the complaint. I trust that this statement will be sufficient to fiilfill the 

requirements outlined in the aforementioned procedural order. 

I also learned fi-om the Procedural Order that I am encouraged to consider the 

possibility of settlement and compromise with the agency attorney. If someone could 

explain to me how we might initiate such a discussion I would be only too happy to 

pursue such a compromise. 

I fully admit to being ignorant and uninformed in such legal matters and procedures, 

and respectfiilly request your understanding and forbearance as I struggle to comply with 

the requirements and legal technicalities of this action. 

lart S. MacPherson 

lugust 9, 2010
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Micheal Todd Wray v. Richard Picard

Appellate case number: 01-19-00188-CV

Trial court case number: 18-CV-0640

Trial court: 10th District Court of Galveston County

The motion for rehearing is denied.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Kelly, and Landau.

Date: ___December 15, 2020_____
##### 



Exhibit 10.2
 PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.
SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
 PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT
       Reference to Plan
 Definitions




---



##### 



Benefit Percentage
 Vesting
 Normal or Early Retirement Date
 Termination Under the Employment Agreement
 Death or Disability
 Change in Control
 Cause
 -2-




---



##### 



Effect of Termination on SERP Benefit
 Normal Retirement Date
 Early Retirement Date
 Termination Under the Employment Agreement
 Death
 Disability
 Change in Control
 -3-




---



##### 



Cause
 Retiree Medical Benefits
 Tax Provisions
 Status of Participation Agreement
 -4-




---



##### 



Entire Agreement
 Severability
 Governing Law
 -5-




---



##### 



PRIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.ATTEST:
    
    By
    /s/ Louis A. Raspino 
Louis A. Raspino
President and Chief Executive Officer/s/ W. Gregory Looser
    
    Date:
    March 15, 2007W. Gregory Looser
Secretary/s/ Brian C. Voegele
EXECUTIVEDate:
    March 15, 2007
 -6-
EXHIBIT 21a

PUBLIC SERVICE
ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY

SIGNIFICANT
SUBSIDIARIES

|                              |  |             |  |                         |         
|----------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------------------- | --------
|Name                          |  | Ownership % |  | State of
 Incorporation
|                              |  |             |  |                        
|                              |  |             |  |                         |         
|PSE&G
 Transition Funding LLC |  | 100         |  |                         | Delaware

The
remaining subsidiaries of Public Service Electric and Gas Company are not
significant subsidiaries as defined in Regulation S-X.

---
**Exhibit B**

**Tarot 680mm ( DJI A2**  **)** Frame: Tarot 680 Flight Controller: DJ I A2 Motors: DJI 3508 Props: DJI 1242 Battery : 8000mah 25c 6s ESCs: Castle Creations 35
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 2966 

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty by increasing 

employment entry, retention, and advancement. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 8, 2015 

Mr. SMITH of Missouri (for himself and Mrs. NOEM) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the purposes of TANF to include reducing poverty 

by increasing employment entry, retention, and advancement. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reducing Poverty 

5 through Employment Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. PURPOSES OF THE TANF PROGRAM TO INCLUDE 

7 REDUCING POVERTY. 

8 Section 401(a) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 

9 601(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 2966 IH

1 ‘‘(5) reduce poverty by increasing employment 

2 entry, retention, and advancement.’’. 

3 SEC. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

4 The amendment made by this Act shall take effect 

5 on October 1, 2015. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008, each of the undersigned, Lawrence J. LeBon, III, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and John LeBlanc, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |     |  |                                                  
|--------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ Lawrence J. LeBon, III                       
|                      |  |     |  | Lawrence J. LeBon, III                           
|                      |  |     |  | President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                      |  |    
|Date: August 11, 2008 |  | By: |  | /s/ John LeBlanc                                 
|                      |  |     |  | John LeBlanc                                     
|                      |  |     |  | Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has been
provided to Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Louisiana Bancorp, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3192 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 210
114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3192

                          [Report No. 114-278]

    To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement of 
integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan transactions under 
  the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in 
                  Lending Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 23, 2015

 Mr. Hill (for himself and Mr. Sherman) introduced the following bill; 
       which was referred to the Committee on Financial Services

                            October 1, 2015

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement of 
integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan transactions under 
  the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in 
                  Lending Act, and for other purposes.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homebuyers Assistance Act''.

SEC. 2. ENFORCEMENT SAFE HARBOR.

    The integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan 
transactions under section 4(a) of the Real Estate Settlement 
Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. 2603(a)), section 105(b) of the Truth 
in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. 1604(b)), and regulations issued under such 
sections may not be enforced against any person until February 1, 2016, 
and no suit may be filed against any person for a violation of such 
requirements occurring before such date, so long as such person has 
made a good faith effort to comply with such requirements.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 210

114th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                               H. R. 3192

                          [Report No. 114-278]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

    To provide for a temporary safe harbor from the enforcement of 
integrated disclosure requirements for mortgage loan transactions under 
  the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 and the Truth in 
                  Lending Act, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 1, 2015

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
# Official Journal L 75/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 75 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6311 March 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 75

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6311 March 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS |
| | * | Council Decision (EU) 2020/392 of 5 March 2020 on the conclusion of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of The Gambia and of the Protocol on the implementation of that Partnership Agreement | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS

*

Council Decision (EU) 2020/392 of 5 March 2020 on the conclusion of the Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of The Gambia and of the Protocol on the implementation of that Partnership Agreement

1

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h

Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,

J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk September 28, 2009

p0921 

# Order

September 28, 2009

139004

PHILLIP DEAN COOPER, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 139004 COA: 283506 Wayne CC: 06-612077-NI RAVIS JENKINS and MARY LOUISE WOODSON, Defendants,

and

FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal th e February 24, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.
.- R-526
OIWICE OF 

# THEAIYTORNEY

# GENERAL

AUSTIN.TEXAS

PRICE DANIEL AT,TORNEY GENERAL July 2, 1947 Hon. B. D. Geeslin County Attorney Ycculloch County Brady, Texas Opinion lV0. V-292 Re: The maximumfee which can be charged by a County Clerk to file a delayed birth certificate. Dear Sir: 

### We refer to your letter of May 27, 1947, in which you submit the following:

“We would like to knowwhether or not Article 1702a-1 is applicable to the filing of delayed birth certificates and If it is, whether or.not it amends Article 4477, Rule 51a, which provides the fees that shall be charged for the filing of such an application.” The compensation of public officials is fixed by the Constitution or Statutes.. An offfcer may not claim or receive any money as fees of office without a law authorizing him to do so, and clearly fixing the amount to which he Is entitled. Tex. Jur., Vol. 34,p.511, section 107.

Regardless of whether a county library system be set up 

### underArticles 1697-1702 of Vernon’s Civil Statutes or under Article 1702-a-1 of said statutes, we are of the opinion that the fees chargeable for birth certificates are controlled aa hereinafter shown.

Section 51a of Article 4477 of Vernon’s Civil Statutes reads, in part:

“a fee of One Dollar ($1.00)’ shall be collected by the Probate Court, fifty cents (50#) of wh‘ich shall be retained by the Court, and fifty cents (50#) of which shall be retained by the clerk of the County Court for recording said birth or death certificate.

. . . certified copies of said birth or death certi-

### Hon.B. D. Geeslln,Page 4, V-292

of saidStatutes,and an applloantfor 

### such a .certifioate

is ohargeablo 

### with the $1.00 fee providedIn saidSeotion 51aOS qaldArtlale a71, but 

### 1s not ohargsable with theal.00 fil- ,ingfee providedIn saidArtield'l702a. Yours very truly ATTORNSYGEWEERbL



### OFTEXAS

W. T. Williams Assistant

wTW:at:wb:jrb

..,
#### PIPPINS v. STATE.

No. 15518.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 18, 1933.

De Witt Bowmer, of Temple, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for arson; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

Neither statement of facts nor bills of exception are to be found in this record. An effort was made to obtain a new trial based on misconduct of the jury, and on the claim that they were permitted to separate during the trial. We note in tne order overruling the motion for new trial that it is recited that evidence was heard on the motion, and that the court, after having heard the evidence, overruled the motion. In the absence of any statement of facts, or bill of exception presenting the testimony heard by the court in connection with the motion for new trial, we must give effect to the presumption that the action of the court was supported and sustained by the evidence heard. Moore v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 51 S.W.(2d) 583; 584; Aston v. State (Tex. Cr. App.) 48 S.W.(2d) 292, 295.

Finding no error in the record, the judgment will be affirmed.
EXHIBIT 31.1
                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John V. Winfield, certify that:

1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Portsmouth Square,
Inc.;

2.  Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.  The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):

    a) all significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: September 28, 2007                      /s/ John V. Winfield
                                              ---------------------------
                                              John V. Winfield, President
                                              and Chief Executive Officer