alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      32.1




CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
      connection with the annual report on Form 10-K of Porta Systems Corp. (the
      “Company”) for the period ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward
      B. Kornfeld, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
      Company, do hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to
§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief
      that:




(1) the
      Report
      fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2) the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








March
      29,
      2007




By:
          /s/
          Edward B. Kornfeld


Edward
      B.
      Kornfeld


Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief
      Financial Officer






This
      certification accompanies each Report pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act
      of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of §18 of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
      furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
      request.
Exhibit 10.1(b)

                                AMENDMENT TO THE
                   AMENDED AND RESTATED PAYLESS CASHWAYS, INC.
                           1998 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN

         The Amended and Restated  Payless  Cashways,  Inc. 1998 Omnibus  Incen-
tive Plan is hereby amended by deleting Section 4 (a) in its entirety and adding
a new Section 4(a) to read as follows:

         (a) Subject to adjustment  as provided in Section 4(c) hereof,  a total
of Three Million  (3,000,000)  Shares shall be available for the grant of Awards
under the Plan;  provided,  however,  that not more  than  Four  Hundred  Eighty
Thousand  (480,000) of such Shares shall be issued as Restricted  Stock and that
no more than Two Hundred Thousand  (200,000) shares of Restricted Stock shall be
issued in any one  fiscal  year.  Any Shares  issued  hereunder  may  consist of
authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares.  If any Shares subject to any
Award granted  hereunder,  or to which such an Award  relates,  are forfeited or
such Award otherwise  terminates without the issuance of such Shares or of other
consideration  in lieu of such Shares,  the Shares subject to such Award,  or to
which such Award relates,  to the extent of any such  forfeiture or termination,
shall again be available  for grant under the Plan.  In addition,  to the extent
permitted by Code Section 422, any Shares  issued by, and any Awards  granted by
or that  become  obligations  of,  the  Company  through or as the result of the
assumption of outstanding grants or the substitution of Shares under outstanding
grants of an acquired  company shall not reduce the Shares  available for grants
under the Plan.

         This Amendment is effective October 18, 2000.

                                                     PAYLESS CASHWAYS, INC.



                                                     By:
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.3759 — Sabanci/DUSA)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2005/C 77/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)  Available on DG COMP website:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/competition/mergers/legislation/consultation/simplified_tru.pdf.

----
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GERARD BELL,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT;

WASHINGTON COURT OF APPEALS,

Division II; PIERCE COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT; CITY OF TACOMA,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 23

- 35017

D.C. No. 3:22

- cv

- 05613

- DGE

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

David G. Estudillo , District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 10, 2023 * *

Before: S.R. THOMAS, McKEOWN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Gerard Bell appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment denying his

request to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983

action alleging due process and other claims . We have jurisdiction under 28

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

OCT 1 8 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2 23

- 35017 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of leave to proceed

IFP. Tripati v. First Nat’l Bank & Tr. , 821 F.2d 1368, 1369 (9th Cir. 1987). We

affirm.

The district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Bell’s request to

proceed IFP because B ell failed to allege facts in his proposed amended complaint

sufficient to state a plausible claim against the defendants

. See id. at 1370 (“A

district court may deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis at the outset if it appears

from the face of the prop osed complaint that the action is frivolous or without

merit.”) ; see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal , 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (explaining that, to

avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as

true, to state a claim to relief th at is plausible on its face” (citation and internal

quotation marks omitted).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright

, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We do not consider documents no t filed with the district court. See United

States v. Elias , 921 F.2d 870, 874 (9th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED

.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





I,
      Christopher Greenwood, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly
      Report on Form 10-QSB of Kentucky
      USA Energy, Inc. ,
      for the
      fiscal quarter ended November 30, 2007 fully complies with the requirements
      of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents in all material
      respects the financial condition and results of operations of Kentucky
      USA Energy, Inc..




Date: January
              14, 2008
            By:
            /s/ Christopher
              GreenwoodChristopher
              GreenwoodChief
              Executive Officerand Chief Financial
              Officer
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.6
                             Amendment to Agreement
                             ----------------------

  This Amendment is made by and between Pitt-Des Moines, Inc. ("Company") and
Thomas R. Lloyd ("Employee") as of the date last written below.

  Whereas the Company and Employee entered into an agreement dated May 9, 1991,
a copy of which is attached hereto;

  Whereas the Company declared a 3 for 2 stock split effective March 28, 1997 as
to its shares of common stock which may have an effect on the above-referenced
agreement; and

  Whereas the Board of Directors of the Company, in effecting said stock split,
directed that the value and number of shares provided for in such agreements be
amended to reflect said stock split.

 Now therefore, intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as
follows:

  A.  The number 2,447,578 in Section 7.01 of the above-referenced agreement
shall be restated to be 3,671,367.

  B.   The price of Thirty Dollars ($30.00) in Section 7.01 of the above-
referenced agreement shall be restated to be Twenty Dollars ($20.00).

  C.   The number Seven Thousand Five Hundred (7,500) in Section 7.01 of the
above referenced agreement shall be restated to be 11,250.

  D.   The above-referenced agreement is otherwise unchanged and remains in full
force and effect.

 Witness the signatures of the parties.  Executed in Duplicate.


Attest:                      Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.


/s/  R. F. Gisler            /s/  R. A. Byers
-----------------            ----------------
By:                          By:


Witness:


/s/ L. Russell               /s/ T. R. Lloyd
--------------              -----------------
                             Thomas R. Lloyd

                          Dated:      September 3, 1997
                                  ---------------------
EXHIBIT 32h

        CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18
                            OF THE UNITED STATES CODE

      I, Thomas M. O'Flynn, Chief Financial Officer of PSEG Energy Holdings
L.L.C., to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report of PSEG
Energy Holdings L.L.C. on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.


                                        /s/ Thomas M. O'Flynn
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        THOMAS M. O'FLYNN
                                        PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C.
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        February 27, 2007
----

**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) and Rule 15d-14(a)**

I, Sidong Zhang, certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of China DashengBiotechnology Company for the quarter ended December 31, 2009; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small businessissuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the small businessissuer and have: 

> 
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared; 

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s secondfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, oris reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and 

5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officers and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): 

> 
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrols over financial reporting. 

Date: February 6, 2009 

/s/ Sidong Zhang                                           Sidong Zhang, Chief Executive Officer 

----
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 76125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21023]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: October 30, 2024.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, 3G54, Rockville, 
MD 20892 (Video Assisted Meeting).
    Contact Person: Hitendra S. Chand, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G54, 
Rockville, MD 20892, (240) 627-3245, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#98f0f1ecfdf6b6fbf0f9f6fcd8f6f1f0b6fff7ee"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d6bebfa2b3b8f8b5beb7b8b296b8bfbef8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: September 11, 2024.
Lauren A. Fleck,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2024-21023 Filed 9-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 185 (Tuesday, September 24, 2024)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Page 77753]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-21942]




                        Presidential Documents 



Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 185 / Tuesday, September 24, 2024 / 
Presidential Documents

___________________________________________________________________

Title 3--
The President

[[Page 77753]]

                Memorandum of September 6, 2024

                
Delegation of Authority Under Section 506(a)(1) 
                of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961

                Memorandum for the Secretary of State

                By the authority vested in me as President by the 
                Constitution and the laws of the United States of 
                America, including section 621 of the Foreign 
                Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), I hereby delegate to the 
                Secretary of State the authority under section 
                506(a)(1) of the FAA to direct the drawdown of up to 
                $250 million in defense articles and services of the 
                Department of Defense, and military education and 
                training, to provide assistance to Ukraine and to make 
                the determinations required under such section to 
                direct such a drawdown.

                You are authorized and directed to publish this 
                memorandum in the Federal Register.
                <GRAPHIC(S) NOT AVAILABLE IN TIFF FORMAT>
                
                    (Presidential Sig.)

                THE WHITE HOUSE,

                    Washington, September 6, 2024

[FR Doc. 2024-21942
Filed 9-23-24; 8:45 am]
Billing code 4710-10-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10060 Conference Calendar

STEVEN DALE FINCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus CLIFF WILLIAMS, Grand Prairie Police Officer, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:99-CV-803-Y

-------------------- June 15, 2000 Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Steven Dale Finch, Texas prisoner # 0525887, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for appointment of counsel. Finch argues that the inmate who assisted him in filing the instant case has been transferred, the case is too complex for him to understand or investigate, he has no legal knowledge, and he is indigent and cannot afford to hire an attorney. Because Finch has not demonstrated exceptional circumstances which would warrant the appointment of counsel, he has not shown that theNo. 00-10060 -2- district court abused its discretion in denying his motion. See Wendell v. Asher , 162 F.3d 887, 892 (5th Cir. 1998).
AFFIRMED.
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Gior G.P., Inc., the General Partner of :

and trading as Gior, LP, Piers 36

- 39 :

North Management Reef, Inc., the :

General Partner of and trading as Isle :

of Capri Associates Reef, LP, :

Appellants :

:

v. : No. 805 C.D. 2017

:

Waterfront Square Reef, LLC, :

Waterfront Squar e Condominium :

Association, GH Property Management, :

LLC :

:

v. :

:

Isle Capri Associations, LP :

PER CURIAM O R D E R

NOW, March 6, 2019

, having considered appellant s ’ application for

reargument and appellee s ’ answer in response thereto , the application is denied.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Securities
and Exchange Commission Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
This schedule has been updated to reflect the adoption of Financial Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 128, "Earnigns Per Share."
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                               1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                          73,300
<SECURITIES>                                     9,800
<RECEIVABLES>                                  578,400
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (28,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    615,500
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,457,500
<PP&E>                                       2,164,400
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,473,400)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               2,261,800
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          719,000
<BONDS>                                        526,700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        75,400
<OTHER-SE>                                     642,300
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 2,261,800
<SALES>                                      2,236,900
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,236,900
<CGS>                                        1,298,600
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,394,700
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                11,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              52,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (201,400)
<INCOME-TAX>                                  (61,200)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (140,200)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (140,200)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (3.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (3.09)


</TABLE>
#### Eddie FELDER, Appellant, v. STATE of Texas, Appellee.

No. 20518.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 1, 1939.

W. C. Wofford, of Taylor, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State!s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for an assault with intent to murder. The punishment assessed *919is confinement in the state penitentiary for a term of two years.

The appellant has filed an affidavit to dismiss this appeal, duly verified as required by law. The motion is granted as prayed for and the appeal is dismissed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the court.
Date 10/29/10 Page of



### INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT Summary Page

Chemical ID: P-11-0029 Reviewer: Bevington/SS

Endpoints-Assessed Table Reasons for not assessing releases

Endpoints/Assessment Cycles 1 Releases Assessed in NCEM2? No XB Testing Required No Hazard Concern No Releases Release Below Acute Threshold 5 Release Below Chronic Threshold 5 Other

Ingestion Surface water No NA X NA NA Ground water (landfill) No NA X NA Consumer Use: DtD 2 No NA NA NA NA No consumer use Inhalation Air: incineration (stack) No NA X X Air: fugitive No NA X Consumer Use: CEM 3 No NA NA NA NA No consumer use Dermal Consumer Use: CEM No NA NA NA NA No consumer use Eco Surface water: ADR conc and/or PDM 4 No NA X NA NA

Consumer Use: DtD No NA NA NA NA No consumer use

1 Assessment cycles are endpoint concentrations and dose calculations within the NCEM2 model.
2 Down-the-Drain
3 Consumer Exposure Model
4 Probabilistic Dilution Model
5 The threshold values for assessing endpoints are 1 mg/day for acute doses and 1 mg/year for chronic doses.

EAB DROP: Release information for this compound does not meet criteria for preparation of an exposure assessment in the Exposure Assessment Branch = s (EAB) Initial Review Exposure Report (this report).