76452 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2024 / Notices 

1See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products 

from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary 

Results, Intent To Rescind, in Part, and Rescission 

in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2022–2023, 89 FR 16726 (March 8, 2024) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceedings,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Results of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review Wood Mouldings and 

Millwork Products from the People’s Republic of 

China; 2022–2023,’’ dated concurrently with, and 

hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Wood Mouldings and Millwork Products 

from the People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Antidumping Duty Determination and 

Antidumping Duty Order, 86 FR 9486 (February 16, 

2021) (Order). 

5See Memorandum, ‘‘Final Results Margin 

Calculation for Jinquan/Baiyuan,’’ dated 

concurrently with this notice (Jinquan/Baiyuan’s 

Final Calculation Memorandum). 

6See Appendix III for a list of these companies. 

7See Preliminary Results, 89 FR at 16726. 

8See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 

9See Longkou Haimeng Mach. Co. v. United 

States, 581 F. Supp. 2d 1344, 1357–60 (CIT 2008) 

(affirming Commerce’s determination to assign a 

4.22 percent dumping margin to the separate-rate 

Subject merchandise includes material 

matching the above description that has been 

finished, packaged, or otherwise processed in 

a third country, including by performing any 

grinding or any other finishing, packaging, or 

processing that would not otherwise remove 

the merchandise from the scope of the 

investigation if performed in the country of 

manufacture of the ferrosilicon. 

Ferrosilicon is currently classifiable under 

subheadings 7202.21.1000, 7202.21.5000, 

7202.21.7500, 7202.21.9000, 7202.29.0010, 

and 7202.29.0050 of the Harmonized Tariff 

Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). 

While the HTSUS numbers are provided for 

convenience and customs purposes, the 

written description of the scope remains 

dispositive. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21175 Filed 9–17–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–117] 

Wood Mouldings and Millwork 

Products From the People’s Republic 

of China: Final Results and Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2022–2023 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., Ltd./Baiyuan 

Wood Machining Co., Ltd. (Jinquan/ 

Baiyuan) and 22 non-individually 

examined exporters of wood mouldings 

and millworks products (WMMP) from 

the People’s Republic of China (China) 

sold subject merchandise to the United 

States at prices below normal value 

(NV) during the period of review (POR), 

February 01, 2022, through January 31, 

2023. Commerce also determines that 

Fujian Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading Co., 

Ltd./Fujian Province Youxi City 

Mangrove Wood Machining Co., Ltd. 

(Yinfeng/Mangrove) did not sell subject 

merchandise to the United States at 

prices below NV during the POR. 

Additionally, we are rescinding this 

review with respect to 12 companies 

that had no reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR. 

DATES: Applicable September 18, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brian Smith or Hannah Lee, AD/CVD 

Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement 

and Compliance, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 

NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: 

(202) 482–1766 or (202) 482–1216, 

respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On March 8, 2024, Commerce 

published the Preliminary Results.1 On 

June 22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in this administrative 

proceeding by seven days.2 The 

deadline for these preliminary results is 

now September 11, 2024. For events 

subsequent to the Preliminary Results, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is wood mouldings and millwork 

products. A full description of the scope 

of the Order is contained in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by interested parties 

in briefs are addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. A list of the 

issues addressed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is provided in 

Appendix I to this notice. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://access.

trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our review and analysis of 

the comments received from the 

interested parties, we made one change 

to the Preliminary Results margin 

calculation for Jinquan/Baiyuan 5 which 

resulted in no change to its preliminary 

margin or to the margin assigned to the 

separate rate companies. 

Partial Rescission 

In the Preliminary Results, we stated 

that we intended to rescind this review 

with respect to 12 companies 6 for 

which Customs and Border Protection 

(CBP) data show no entries of the 

subject merchandise from these 

companies during the POR.7 No party 

filed comments with respect to this 

preliminary finding and we received no 

information to contradict it. Therefore, 

we are rescinding this administrative 

review with respect to these companies. 

Rate for Non-Examined Separate Rate 

Respondents 

The statute and our regulations do not 

address the establishment of a rate to be 

assigned to respondents not selected for 

individual examination when we limit 

our examination of companies subject to 

the administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). Generally, 

we look to section 735(c)(5) of the Act, 

which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for respondents not 

individually examined in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ Accordingly, 

Commerce’s usual practice in 

determining the rate for separate-rate 

respondents not selected for individual 

examination, has been to average the 

weighted-average dumping margins of 

the selected companies, excluding rates 

that are zero, de minimis, or based 

entirely on facts available.8 Because in 

these final results of this review we 

calculated a dumping margin of zero for 

Yinfeng/Mangrove, and a dumping 

margin that is not zero, de minimis, or 

based entirely on facts available for 

Jinquan/Baiyuan, we assigned the 

separate-rate recipients a dumping 

margin equal to Jinquan/Baiyuan’s final 

dumping margin consistent with 

Commerce’s practice and section 

735(c)(5)(B) of the Act.9


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2024 / Notices 76453 

respondents in a segment where the three 

mandatory respondents received dumping margins 

of 4.22 percent, 0.03 percent, and zero percent, 

respectively); see also Certain Kitchen Appliance 

Shelving and Racks from the People’s Republic of 

China: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 74 FR 36656, 36660 (July 24, 2009). 

10These companies are: (1) Aventra, Inc. 

(Aventra); (2) China Cornici, Co. Ltd. (China 

Cornici); (3) Gaomi Hongtai Home Furniture Co., 

Ltd. (Gaomi Hongtai); and (4) and Shuyang 

Zhongding Decoration Materials Co., Ltd. (Shuyang 

Zhongding). 

11See Preliminary Results PDM at 13. 

12See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement 

of Change in Department Practice for Respondent 

Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and 

Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy 

Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 

FR 65963, 65969–70 (November 4, 2013). 

13See Order, 86 FR at 9488. The weighted-average 

dumping margin for the China-wide entity (231.60 

percent) was adjusted for export subsidies to 

determine the cash deposit rate (220.87 percent) for 

companies in the China-wide entity. 

14See Appendix II. 

15 In these preliminary results, Commerce applied 

the assessment rate calculation method adopted in 

Antidumping Proceedings: Calculation of the 

Weighted-Average Dumping Margin and 

Assessment Rate in Certain Antidumping 

Proceedings: Final Modification, 77 FR 8101 

(February 14, 2012). 16See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

The China-Wide Entity 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

found that four companies 10 did not 

establish eligibility for a separate rate 

because they did not file a timely 

separate rate application or a separate 

rate certification, as appropriate.11 No 

party filed comments with respect to 

this preliminary finding and we 

received no information to contradict it. 

Therefore, for these final results, we 

determine these four companies to be 

part of the China-wide entity and 

assigned them the dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity. Because no party 

requested a review of the China-wide 

entity, and Commerce no longer 

considers the China-wide entity as an 

exporter conditionally subject to 

administrative reviews,12 we did not 

conduct a review of the China-wide 

entity. Thus, the dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity, as adjusted for 

export subsidies (i.e., 220.87 percent),13

is not subject to change as a result of 

this review. 

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

February 1, 2022, through January 31, 

2023: 

Exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Fujian Jinquan Trade Co., 

Ltd./Baiyuan Wood Machining Co., Ltd ................. 4.25 

Yinfeng Imp & Exp Trading 

Co., Ltd./Fujian Province 

Youxi City Mangrove 

Wood Machining Co., Ltd 0.00 

Exporters 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Non-Selected Companies 

Under Review Receiving a 

Separate Rate 14 ............... 4.25 

Disclosure 

We intend to disclose the calculations 

performed to parties in this proceeding 

within five days of the date of 

publication of this notice in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

has determined, and CBP shall assess, 

antidumping duties on all appropriate 

entries of subject merchandise in 

accordance with these final results of 

review. Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of these final results. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Because Jinquan/Baiyuan’s ad 

valorem weighted-average final 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.50 percent), we 

have calculated importer-specific 

assessment rates for this respondent, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).15

For sales for which Jinquan/Baiyuan 

reported entered value, we have 

calculated importer-specific ad valorem 

assessment rates based on the ratio of 

the total amount of dumping calculated 

for each importer’s examined sales to 

the total entered value of those sales, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). 

For sales for which Jinquan/Baiyuan did 

not report entered value, we have 

calculated importer-specific per-unit 

duty assessment rates based on the ratio 

of the total amount of antidumping 

duties calculated for the examined sales 

to the total quantity of those sales. To 

determine whether an importer-specific, 

per-unit assessment rate is de minimis, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 

351.106(c)(2), we also calculated an 

importer-specific ad valorem ratio based 

on estimated entered values. 

For Yinfeng/Mangrove, we will 

instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate 

entries without regard to antidumping 

duties.16 For entries that were not 

reported in the U.S. sales databases 

submitted by Yinfeng/Mangrove and 

Jinquan/Baiyuan during this review, 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

such entries at the China-wide rate (i.e., 

220.87 percent). 

For the companies identified as part 

of the China-wide entity (i.e., Aventra, 

China Cornici, Gaomi Hongtai and 

Shuyang Zhongding), we will instruct 

CBP to apply the China-wide rate (i.e., 

220.87 percent) to all entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR which 

were exported by these companies. 

For the 12 companies listed in 

Appendix III, for which the 

administrative review is rescinded, 

antidumping duties shall be assessed at 

a rate equal to the cash deposit of 

estimated antidumping duties required 

at the time of entry, or withdrawal from 

warehouse, for consumption, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 

351.212(c)(1)(i). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the final results of this 

administrative review for all shipments 

of the subject merchandise from China 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date, as provided by section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) for Yinfeng/ 

Mangrove, the cash deposit rate will be 

zero; (2) for Jinquan/Baiyuan and the 

other companies which were found 

eligible for a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be 4.25 percent; (3) for 

previously investigated or reviewed 

Chinese and non-Chinese exporters not 

listed above that have separate rates, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

exporter-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which they were 

reviewed; (4) for all Chinese exporters of 

subject merchandise that have not been 

found to be entitled to a separate rate, 

the cash deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity (i.e., 220.87 

percent); and (5) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter. These per-unit cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
76454 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 181 / Wednesday, September 18, 2024 / Notices 

1See Ferrosilicon from the Russian Federation: 

Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty 

Determination, 89 FR 53949 (June 28, 2024) 

(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 

2See also Ferrosilicon from the Russian 

Federation: Preliminary Affirmative Critical 

Circumstances Determinations, 89 FR 68860 

(August 28, 2024) (Preliminary Critical 

Circumstances Determination). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines in 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Proceeding,’’ dated July 22, 2024. 

4See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for 

the Final Affirmative Determination in the 

Countervailing Duty Investigation of Ferrosilicon 

from the Russian Federation,’’ dated concurrently 

with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 

Decision Memorandum). 

Notification to Importers Regarding the 

Reimbursement of Duties 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping and/or countervailing 

duties prior to liquidation of the 

relevant entries during this POR. Failure 

to comply with this requirement could 

result in Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties has occurred and 

the subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or increase in 

the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of the countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order (APO) 

This notice also serves as a reminder 

to parties subject to an APO of their 

responsibility concerning the return or 

destruction of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials, or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

violation which is subject to sanction. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of administrative review 

and notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(2). 

Dated: September 11, 2024. 

Ryan Majerus, 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and 

Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive 

functions and duties of the Assistant 

Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

General 

Comment 1: Whether to Apply Adverse 

Facts Available to Yinfeng/Mangrove 

and Jinquan/Baiyuan 

Comment 2: Labor Surrogate Value 

Selection 

Comment 3: Selection of Surrogate 

Producers 

Comment 4: Market Economy Purchases 

Jinquan/Baiyuan 

Comment 5: Jinquan/Baiyuan’s Electricity 

Offset 

Comment 6: Freight Revenue Cap 

Comment 7: Exclusion of Certain U.S. 

Sales With Entry Dates After the POR 

Comment 8: Valuation of Wood Powder 

Comment 9: Valuation of Radiata Pine Log 

Separate Rate Companies 

Comment 10: Liquidation Instructions for 

CTIL 

Appendix II 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

Receiving a Separate Rate 

1. Anji Huaxin Bamboo & Wood Products 

Co., Ltd. 

2. Composite Technology International, 

Limited 

3. Fujian Hongjia Craft Products Co., Ltd. 

4. Fujian Sanming City Donglai Wood Co., 

Ltd. 

5. Fujian Wangbin Decorative Material Co., 

Ltd. 

6. Fujian Youxi Best Arts & Crafts Co. Ltd. 

7. Huaan Longda Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

8. Jiangsu Wenfeng Wood Co., Ltd. 

9. Longquan Jiefeng Trade Co., Ltd. 

10. Nanping Huatai Wood & Bamboo Co., 

Ltd. 

11. Nicer Window Fashions Co., Ltd. 

12. Putian Yihong Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

13. Qimen Jianxing Bamboo and Wood Goods 

Co., Ltd. 

14. Rui Xing Wooden Products Co., Ltd. 

15. Shandong Miting Household Co., Ltd. 

16. Shaxian Hengtong Wood Industry Co., 

Ltd. 

17. Shaxian Shiyiwood, Ltd. 

18. Shuyang Kevin International Co., Ltd. 

19. Sun Valley Shade Co., Ltd. 

20. Suqian Sulu Import & Export Trading Co., 

Ltd. 

21. Zhangzhou Wangjiamei Industry & Trade 

Co., Ltd. 

22. Zhangzhou Yihong Industrial Co., Ltd. 

Appendix III 

Companies for Which the Review Is 

Rescinded 

1. Jiangsu Chen Sheng Forestry Development 

Co., Ltd. 

2. Omni One Co., Ltd. 

3. Raoping HongRong Handicrafts Co., Ltd. 

4. Baixing Import and Export Trading Co., 

Ltd Youxi Fujian 

5. Bel Trade Wood Industrial Co., Ltd. Youxi 

Fujian 

6. Fotiou Frames Limited 

7. Fujian Zhangping Kimura Forestry 

Products Co., Ltd. 

8. Homebuild Industries Co., Ltd. 

9. Jim Fine Wooden Products Co., Ltd. 

10. Shenzhen Xinjintai Industrial Co., Ltd. 

11. Tim Feng Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

12. Wuxi Boda Bamboo & Wood Industrial 

Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21225 Filed 9–17–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–821–839] 

Ferrosilicon From the Russian 

Federation: Final Affirmative 

Countervailing Duty Determination and 

Final Affirmative Determination of 

Critical Circumstances 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies are being 

provided to producers and exporters of 

ferrosilicon from the Russian Federation 

(Russia). The period of investigation 

(POI) is January 1, 2023, through 

December 31, 2023. 

DATES: Applicable September 18, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Mark Hoadley, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3148. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On June 28, 2024, Commerce 

published its Preliminary Determination 

in the Federal Register and invited 

interested parties to comment.1

Subsequently, on August 28, 2024, 

Commerce published its Preliminary 

Critical Circumstances Determination in 

the Federal Register and invited 

interested parties to comment.2 On July 

22, 2024, Commerce tolled certain 

deadlines in these administrative 

proceedings by seven days.3 The 

deadline for the final determination is 

now September 11, 2024. For a 

complete discussion of the events that 

followed the Preliminary Determination, 

see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.4


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES