alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
        32.2
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 
 In
        connection with the Quarterly Report of Zones, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q
        for the period ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
        Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ronald P. McFadden, Chief
        Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
        1350,
        as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
        that:
 
 (1)           The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)           The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 
 Date:
        November 13, 2007
 
 
 /S/   RONALD
                  P MCFADDENRonald
                  P. McFaddenChief
                  Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<CASH>                                          15,905
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   19,121
<ALLOWANCES>                                       145
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,819
<PP&E>                                           5,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  51,991
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            6,565
<BONDS>                                          2,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        32,008
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,154
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    51,991
<SALES>                                            491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                29,614
<CGS>                                              452
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   25,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    14
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    75
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 113
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,269
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,752
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,517
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,517
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-30821

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

DAVID JEROME FRANK,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Louisiana

USDC No. 2:03-CR-20067-1

Before KING, GRAVES, and COSTA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

David Jerome Frank, federal prisoner # 08457-035, appeals the district 

court’s denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentencing reduction 

based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. On March 15, 2016, 

before this case was decided, Frank was released from federal custody. “Where 

a defendant has begun serving a term of supervised release, the appeal of the 

denial of his § 3582(c)(2) motion is moot.” United States v. Booker, 645 F.3d 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

November 17, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-30821 Document: 00513763625 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/17/2016
No. 15-30821

2

328, 328 (5th Cir. 2011). Because Frank’s appeal concerns only the term of his

imprisonment, and makes no challenge to his term of supervised release, his

arguments pertain only to relief under § 3582(c)(2). Accordingly, Frank’s

appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

 Case: 15-30821 Document: 00513763625 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/17/2016
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 1408

In re: THOMAS LAGENE FRANKLIN , Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ( 3:06

- cr
- 00007

- RJC

- 1 )

Submitted : August 10, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018

Before DIAZ and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.
Thomas Lagene Franklin, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Lagene Franklin petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his authorized, successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. Franklin seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that, by order and judgment entered on June 22, 2018, the district court denied Franklin’s § 2255 motion. Accordingly, because the district court recently decided Franklin’s motion, we deny the mandamus p etition as moot. We grant Franklin leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 June 8, 2007
 O. I. CORPORATION
  Oklahoma
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    0-6511
(Commission File Number)
    
    73-0728053
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 151 Graham Road, P.O. Box 9010, College Station, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77842-9010
(Zip Code)
  
  
 see
 o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain
Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  O. I. CORPORATION
Date: June 14, 2007By:
    /s/ J. Bruce LancasterJ. Bruce Lancaster,CEO and CFO
February 12, 2015 

Mr. Scott Faulk 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

EAS & Domestic Analysis Division 

Re: Comments on Order 2014-12-2 

EAS at lmperiai/EI Centro 

Greetings, 

CITY COUNCIL 

Geoff Dale- Mayor 

Mark Gran- Mayor Pro-Tem 

Rick Breland -council Member 

Doug cox- Council Member 

, r,, Betty Sampson- Council Member 

',_._ 

CITY CLERK 

Debra jackson 

CITY TREASURER 

Stacy cox 

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the air carrier proposals received for the EAS at 

lmperiai/EI Centro. The City of Imperial considers Essential Air Service a critical piece of infrastructure 

for our community from several perspectives including public safety, economic opportunity and regional 

communication support. All of these issues are improved and enhanced by the benefit of EAS to our 

region. 

The City wishes to thank you for the waiver granted recently that allowed SeaPort Airlines to continue to 

serve our community and provided our citizenry with the opportunity to continue air carrier service to 

two urban airports. Having reviewed both proposals submitted for the next period of EAS, the City of 

Imperial supports continuing service with SeaPort Airlines. 

SeaPort has become a good community partner and is pursuing a major marketing push. Local agencies, 

businesses and residents are gaining awareness of their existing services that would be extended with 

the latest proposal. SeaPort's proposal offers the opportunity for same day connections from other 

areas of southern California to attend meetings and functions in our region and have the convenience of 

returning home in the same day. This service is just beginning to be realized by public agencies and 

businesses and it is not offered in the Great Lakes proposal. SeaPort offers more flight times per day 

that increases the connections for our region and has some interline agreements with additional 

agreements in process. 

For these reasons and others, the City Council of Imperial took action on February 4, 2015 to support the 

proposal submitted by SeaPort Airlines in the next round of EAS for the lmperiai/EI Centro region. 

Thank you, 

b--~~ City Manager 

420 SOUTH IMPERIAL AVENUE • IMPERIAL, CA 92251 • TEL (760) 355-4371 • FAX {760) 355-4718 • WWW.C!TYOFIMPER!AL.ORG
Exhibit










EXHIBIT 10.2
SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE
This is a Second Amendment to Lease (this “Second Amendment”) entered into as of November 1, 2017 (the “Effective Date”) by and between TRUSTEES OF LEXINGTON OFFICE REALTY TRUST (“Landlord”) and CURIS, INC. (“Tenant”).
WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant entered into a Lease dated September 16, 2010, as amended by First Amendment to Lease as of February 28, 2011 (as so amended, the “Lease”); and
WHEREAS, the term of the Lease is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2018, and Landlord and Tenant wish to extend the term thereof for two (2) years.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and for other consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Landlord and Tenant agree as follows:
1.Capitalized Terms.  Capitalized terms used herein without definition shall have the meaning ascribed to them by the Lease.


2.Original Term.  The definition of Original Term set forth in Section 1.1 of the Lease is hereby amended to expire on February 29, 2020.


3.Annual Fixed Rent.  Year 7 shall expire on February 28, 2018.  For the year commencing in March 1, 2018 and expiring February 28, 2019, Annual Fixed Rent shall be $981,160.00, and for the year commencing on March 1, 2019 and expiring February 29, 2020, Annual Fixed Rent shall be $1,005,689.00.


4.Improvements.  Landlord shall, within approximately ninety (90) days from the Execution Date, install a keyless entry access system at the Building entrance double doors facing the parking lot adjacent to the Building.  So long as Landlord shall maintain the system software as currently configured, Landlord shall provide Tenant with remote access to the ancillary energy management software (“EMS”) for the Building to allow off-site monitoring by Tenant of certain Building systems monitored by this EMS.  Tenant acknowledges that this ancillary system is supplementary to the Building’s primary EMS, and it shall be Landlord’s sole decision whether to maintain the operation of this software and/or access to same.  


5.Security Deposit.  The Security Deposit amount shall remain at $152,650.30 for the balance of the term of the Lease.


6.Brokerage.  Tenant warrants and represents that it has dealt with no broker in connection with the consummation of this Second Amendment, and in the event of any brokerage claims or liens against Landlord or the Premises or the Property predicated upon or arising out of prior dealings with Tenant, Tenant agrees to defend the same and indemnify and hold Landlord harmless against any such claim, and to discharge any such lien.


7.Affirmation.  Except as herein amended, the Lease is hereby ratified and confirmed.











IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Landlord and Tenant have executed this Second Amendment as of the Effective Date.
	
	
	LANDLORD:

	Trustees of Lexington Office Realty Trust

	By:The RMR Group LLC, its agent

	By:  /s/ Jennifer F. Francis/SJF/
Jennifer F. Francis
Senior Vice President

	 

	TENANT:

	Curis, Inc.

	By:  /s/ James E. Dentzer /STT/
James E. Dentzer
Chief Financial Officer and
Chief Administrative Officer
mmex_ex104.htm

EXHIBIT 10.4
  
 AMENDMENT #1 TO THE EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO ON JUNE 12, 2017 
  
 THIS AMENDMENT #1 (the “Amendment”) TO THE EQUITY PURCHASE AGREEMENT ENTERED INTO ON June 12, 2017, is made effective as of October 9, 2017, by and between MMEX Resources Corporation, Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and Crown Bridge Partners, LLC, a New York limited liability company (the “Holder”) (collectively the “Parties”).
  
 BACKGROUND
  
 A. The Company and Holder are the parties to that certain equity purchase agreement (the “EPA”) originally entered into by the Company and Holder on June 12, 2017; and
  
 B. The Parties desire to amend the EPA as set forth expressly below.
  
 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the execution and delivery of the Amendment and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
  
 1. Sections 7.1(a) and 7.2(b) of the EPA shall be removed in its entirety.
  
 2. Section 7.2(p) of the EPA shall be replaced in its entirety with the following sentence:
  
 (p) MINIMUM PRICING. The lowest traded price of the Company’s Common Stock for the twenty-five (25) trading days immediately prior to the date of the respective Put Notice shall be greater than $0.001.
  
 3. The following Section 10.16 shall be added to the EPA:
  
 Section 10.16 CONVERSION LIMITATION. The Investor shall be prohibited from delivering a notice of conversion with respect to the Commitment Note during the period beginning on the date that a Put Notice has been received by the Investor and ending on the first Trading Day immediately following the closing associated with such Put Notice, provided that if (i) such closing does not occur within twelve (12) Trading Days following the receipt of such Put Notice by the Company or (ii) the Company does not deliver the respective Put Shares within the applicable two (2) Trading Day timeframe as provided in this Agreement, then this provision shall be null and void and of no effect with respect to that specific Put Notice.
  
 4. This Amendment shall be deemed part of, but shall take precedence over and supersede any provisions to the contrary contained in the EPA. Except as specifically modified hereby, all of the provisions of the EPA, which are not in conflict with the terms of this Amendment, shall remain in full force and effect.
  
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Amendment as of the date first above written.
  
  	MMEX Resources Corporation	  
	 Crown Bridge Partners, LLC
	
	 	  
	  
	 	 	 
	 By: 
	 /s/ Jack W. Hanks
	  
	By:	/s/ Seth Ahdoot	
	 Name: 
	 Jack W. Hanks
	  
	 Name: 
	Seth Ahdoot	 
	Title: 	 Chief Executive Officer
	  
	Title: 	Member
Exhibit 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-42899, 333-65479, 333-14577, 333-41950, 333-90276 and 333-102227) of Precision Castparts Corp. of our report dated June 14, 2006 relating to the financial statements and financial statement
schedule which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP
|PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP    
|                              
|Portland, Oregon              
|                              
|May 31, 2007                  
|
# Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of Disaboom, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-Q for the period ended Marcy 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John Walpuck, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

1.       
          The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
          Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2.       
          The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ John Walpuck
Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer

Dated: May 14, 2009

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA FLED

PR 06-0544

IN RE PETITION OF RONALD R. PIPER FOR

REINSTATEMENT TO ACTIVE STATUS IN THE

BAR OF MONTANA

JUL 2 0 2021

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of Supreme Court

State of Montana

ORDER

Ronald J. Piper has petitioned the Court for reinstatement to active status in the State

Bar of Montana. Piper was placed on inactive status on July 12, 2021, for failing to comply

with the Rules for Continuing Legal alucation for the reporting year ending March 31,

2021. /1\nached to the Petition is a letter from the State Bar stating that Piper has now

completed all CLE requirements for that reporting year. The Petition states that Piper is

not currently subject to disciplinary proceedings and has not committed any acts or

omissions sanctionable under the Rules of Professional Conduct while on inactive status.

Good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition of Ronald R. Piper 10r reinstatement

to active status in the State Bar of Montana is GRANTED. Upon payment of any remaining

dues, fees, and the state license tax to the State Bar of Montana, Piper shall be reinstated.

The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this order to the Petitioner and the State

Bar of Montana.

DATED this aoday of July, 2021.

Chief Just.

. 

07/20/2021

Case Number: PR 06-0544
LA•J"-~-4, 

/(2:1 /4 JUL

Justices
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Aaron Ui, the Chief Executive Officer of Mar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc., and Ian Foreman, the Chief Financial Officer ofMar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to their knowledge, the Report on Form 10-QSB ofMar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc., for the quarterly period ended February 28, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and that the information contained in the Report on Form 10-QSB fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations ofMar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc.

Date:  May 14, 2007

| | /s/ Aaron Ui
________________________________                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | Aaron Ui 
President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and a director              
| | /s/ Ian Foreman
__________________________________                                                    
| | Ian Foreman
Secretary, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and a director

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Mar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc. and will be retained by Mar Ked Mineral Exploration, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

__________
**EXHIBIT 32.02**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Systematic Momentum LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Barbra E. Kocsis, ChiefFinancial Officer of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC, the manager ofthe Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2008                  |                  |
|-----------------------------------------------|-----------------------|
|                                          |                  |
| By                                            | /s/  BARBRA E. KOCSIS |   |
| Barbra  E. Kocsis                             |                  |
| Chief  Financial Officer                      |                  |
| (Principal  Financial and Accounting Officer) |                  |
|                                               |                       |  |

 

----
bmrn-ex101_236.htm



Exhibit 10.1

 

BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

Summary of Independent Director Compensation

 

Effective as of September 28, 2017, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc. (the “Company”) approved revised compensation for the independent directors of the Company.  All independent directors are now entitled to receive a combination of annual cash retainers and restricted stock unit (“RSU”) grants as summarized below as compensation for their service on the Company’s Board and Board committees.  

Cash Compensation

The following table is a summary of the annual cash compensation payable to independent directors. Each applicable line item is an additional element of compensation.


	
Director Position
	
Annual Cash
Compensation
	
 

	
All Independent Directors
	
           
	
$
	
65,000
	
 

	
Additional Elements of Compensation:
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
Independent Chair of the Board (if applicable)
	
 
	
$
	
65,000
	
 

	
Lead Independent Director (if applicable)
	
 
	
$
	
65,000
	
 

	
Audit Committee Member
	
 
	
$
	
12,000
	
 

	
Audit Committee Chair (premium in addition to committee membership retainer) 
	
 
	
$
	
13,000
	
 

	
Compensation Committee Member
	
 
	
$
	
10,000
	
 

	
Compensation Committee Chair (premium in addition to committee membership retainer)
	
 
	
$
	
10,000
	
 

	
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Member 
	
 
	
$
	
8,750
	
 

	
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee Chair (premium in addition to committee membership retainer)
	
 
	
$
	
10,000
	
 

	
Science and Technology Committee Member
	
 
	
$
	
8,750
	
 

	
Science and Technology Committee Chair (premium in addition to committee membership retainer)
	
 
	
$
	
10,000
	
 




 

Equity Compensation

Annual Award

On the date of our annual meeting of stockholders for a given year, each reelected director receives an RSU grant valued at $375,000, based on the Black-Scholes model valuation using a three-month trailing average closing price of our common stock.  The shares of common stock subject to the Annual Award vest in full on the one-year anniversary of the grant date, subject to each respective director providing service to the Company through such vesting date.  

New Independent Directors 

Upon election or appointment, a new independent director will receive an RSU grant on the same terms as the Annual Award, pro-rated for amount and vesting to the nearest quarter for the time such new director will serve prior to the Company’s next Annual Meeting of Stockholders.