Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C. 20460 December 2009

www.epa.gov/oust

Semi-Annual Report Of UST Performance Measures

End Of Fiscal Year 2009 – As Of September 30, 2009

Where does EPA get the performance data? 

Twice each year, EPA collects data from states and territories regarding underground storage tank (UST) 

performance measures and makes the data publicly available. This data includes information such as the number of 

active and closed tanks, releases reported, cleanups initiated and completed, facilities in compliance with UST 

requirements, and inspections. EPA compiles the data and presents it in table format for all states, territories, and 

Indian country. 

What are the UST performance measures? 

The most current definitions for the UST performance measures are available on EPA’s Web site

www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm under Definitions. 

What is in the end of fiscal year (FY) 2009 report? 

 Page

UST Corrective Action Measures For End Of Year FY 2009 

 Alphabetical By State Within Region 1 

 National Totals 5 

UST National Backlog Graph 6 

UST Compliance Measures For End Of Year FY 2009 7 

 States With More Stringent SOC Requirements 9 

Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions End Of Year FY 2009 11

How did the UST program’s performance compare with its goals? 

FY 2009 UST Program Goal FY 2009 UST Program Performance

Complete 12,250 cleanups, including 30 in 

Indian country

Exceeded the FY 2009 goal by completing 12,944 cleanups, 

including 49 in Indian country

Achieve a significant operational compliance 

rate of 65 percent

Exceeded the FY 2009 goal by achieving a significant operational 

compliance rate of 66.4 percent

Decrease newly-confirmed releases to fewer 

than 9,000

Exceeded the FY 2009 goal by decreasing newly-confirmed 

releases to 7,168

What other highlights are included in the end of FY 2009 report?

• There are 611,449 active USTs (at approximately 223,000 sites) which are regulated by the UST 

regulations 

• Since the 1984 inception of the UST program, 1,718,833 substandard USTs have been closed 

• Of the 488,496 leaks reported since the beginning of the UST program, 388,331 (or 79.5 percent) have 

been cleaned up, leaving a backlog of 100,165 remaining to be cleaned up 

• 95,675 on-site inspections at federally-regulated UST facilities were conducted between October 2008 

and September 2009; of those: 

– 95,296 were conducted by states, territories, and third-party inspectors 

– 379 were conducted by EPA and credentialed tribal inspectors in Indian country 
 Office of Underground Storage Tanks, Washington, D.C. 20460 December 2009

www.epa.gov/oust

Where can I find performance data from previous years? 

EPA’s Web site www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm provides the most current report, as well as historical 

reports beginning with FY 1988, the first year reports were developed. Reports are listed beginning with the most 

recent first. 

For more information, contact Matt Young, EPA’s Office of Underground Storage Tanks, at 

young.matthew@epa.gov or 703-603-7143. 
Number of 

Active Tanks

Number of 

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases Cleanups 

Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Region / State

Emergency 

Responses

Cleanups 

Actions This Year Cumulative Actions This Year Cumulative Backlog

ONE

CT 8,576 24,174 84 2,672 2,617 57 1,817 855 120

MA 10,410 23,647 53 6,202 6,165 208 5,792 410 5,218

ME 3,049 12,771 57 2,500 2,477 61 2,464 36 570

NH 3,143 11,358 38 2,396 2,396 78 1,667 729 683

RI 1,612 7,751 5 1,324 1,324 21 1,078 246 27

VT 3,133 5,604 23 2,008 1,993 50 1,302 706 311

SUBTOTAL 29,923 85,305 17,102 16,972 14,120 2,982 6,929 260 475

TWO

NJ 15,764 58,627 165 10,431 9,575 150 6,270 4,161 55

NY 27,348 89,435 924 27,225 27,205 1,038 24,896 2,329 1,334

PR 4,501 5,708 12 1,042 822 7 486 556 190

VI 144 278 2 24 23 6 13 11 14

SUBTOTAL 47,757 154,048 38,722 37,625 31,665 7,057 1,593 1,103 1,201

THREE

DC 667 3,210 22 881 866 34 691 190 264

DE 1,411 7,073 55 2,529 2,431 89 2,293 236 415

MD 8,337 33,506 214 11,281 11,036 273 10,700 581 339

PA 24,125 62,587 201 14,880 14,782 554 11,814 3,066 28

VA 19,455 59,442 157 11,437 11,337 240 10,908 529 63

WV 5,589 19,616 82 3,210 3,022 84 2,302 908 10

SUBTOTAL 59,584 185,434 44,218 43,474 38,708 5,510 1,119 731 1,274

UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2009 (Cumulative as of September 30, 2009)

1

Definitions of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are available on OUST's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm.
Number of 

Active Tanks

Number of 

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases Cleanups 

Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Region / State

Emergency 

Responses

Cleanups 

Actions This Year Cumulative Actions This Year Cumulative Backlog

FOUR

AL 18,602 29,646 103 11,398 11,303 176 10,038 1,360 448

FL 25,636 104,938 169 25,955 15,891 709 11,624 14,331 204

GA 29,821 47,353 286 12,319 12,044 567 10,536 1,783 2

KY 11,786 37,570 277 14,275 14,241 403 12,268 2,007 188

MS 8,680 22,839 97 7,031 6,932 76 6,721 310 128

NC 27,806 66,809 234 24,555 22,808 574 19,085 5,470 658

SC 11,861 32,620 151 9,319 8,956 262 6,358 2,961 99

TN 16,636 36,191 211 13,962 13,851 245 13,450 512 69

SUBTOTAL 150,828 377,966 118,814 106,026 90,080 28,734 1,796 1,528 3,012

FIVE

IL 21,955 64,985 330 24,358 22,834 901 18,089 6,269 1,884

IN 13,614 37,004 172 8,949 8,633 405 6,735 2,214 294

MI 19,529 68,059 183 21,818 21,360 203 12,655 9,163 82

MN 14,694 28,191 208 10,416 10,327 284 9,684 732 680

OH 23,067 43,080 821 27,866 27,064 850 25,046 2,820 417

WI 14,920 66,577 110 18,801 18,437 282 16,592 2,209 385

SUBTOTAL 107,779 307,896 112,208 108,655 88,801 23,407 3,742 1,824 2,925

UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2009 (Cumulative as of September 30, 2009)

2

Definitions of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are available on OUST's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm.
Number of 

Active Tanks

Number of 

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases Cleanups 

Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Region / State

Emergency 

Responses

Cleanups 

Actions This Year Cumulative Actions This Year Cumulative Backlog

SIX

AR 9,251 20,690 30 1,448 1,142 36 1,152 296 24

LA 12,243 32,386 291 3,898 3,898 363 2,724 1,174 831

NM 3,958 12,461 18 2,542 1,879 41 1,785 757 87

OK 10,742 26,204 97 4,720 4,702 148 4,320 400 148

TX 53,094 115,071 289 25,813 24,530 639 23,130 2,683 582

SUBTOTAL 89,288 206,812 38,421 36,151 33,111 5,310 1,672 725 1,227

SEVEN

IA 7,873 22,052 45 5,977 5,646 136 4,613 1,364 250

KS 6,898 20,165 48 4,917 4,790 180 3,385 1,532 123

MO 9,717 30,225 157 6,530 6,256 221 5,385 1,145 382

NE 6,825 14,513 39 6,147 4,705 112 4,404 1,743 14

SUBTOTAL 31,313 86,955 23,571 21,397 17,787 5,784 769 289 649

EIGHT

CO 7,893 21,570 162 7,221 7,126 183 6,455 766 43

MT 3,247 12,390 19 2,999 2,620 53 1,944 1,055 47

ND 2,136 7,114 6 834 821 10 820 14 4

SD 3,035 6,961 29 2,411 2,410 114 2,424 -13 22

UT 3,972 13,018 52 4,456 4,415 81 4,053 403 5

WY 1,889 7,904 19 2,710 1,659 77 954 1,756 70

SUBTOTAL 22,172 68,957 20,631 19,051 16,650 3,981 191 287 518

UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2009 (Cumulative as of September 30, 2009)

3

 

Definitions of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are available on OUST's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm.
Number of 

Active Tanks

Number of 

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases Cleanups 

Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Region / State

Emergency 

Responses

Cleanups 

Actions This Year Cumulative Actions This Year Cumulative Backlog

NINE

AS 16 52 0 8 7 0 7 1 1

AZ 7,050 20,859 34 8,523 7,999 180 7,557 966 0

CA 36,899 126,894 148 43,156 43,156 1,066 31,222 11,934 0

CNMI 68 28 1 10 9 3 9 1 0

GU 264 435 0 138 138 1 113 25 0

HI 1,622 5,345 34 1,989 1,909 48 1,755 234 0

NV 3,781 6,985 15 2,457 2,456 26 2,288 169 52

SUBTOTAL 49,700 160,598 56,281 55,674 42,951 13,330 53 232 1,324

TEN

AK 1,191 6,428 48 2,300 2,245 50 1,825 475 47

ID 3,492 10,448 18 1,424 1,392 28 1,276 148 12

OR 5,896 25,978 62 7,183 6,933 143 6,045 1,138 56

WA 9,900 36,346 43 6,442 6,382 69 4,464 1,978 39

SUBTOTAL 20,479 79,200 17,349 16,952 13,610 3,739 154 171 290

UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2009 (Cumulative as of September 30, 2009)

4

Definitions of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are available on OUST's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm.

 
Number of 

Active Tanks

Number of 

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases Cleanups 

Initiated

Cleanups Completed

Region / State

Emergency 

Responses

Cleanups 

Actions This Year Cumulative Actions This Year Cumulative Backlog

REGIONAL CORRECTIVE ACTIONS FOR INDIAN COUNTRY

REGION 1 8 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

REGION 2 132 28 0 6 2 1 5 1 0

REGION 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

REGION 4 64 61 0 13 13 0 11 2 2

REGION 5 423 994 2 220 213 4 154 66 0

REGION 6 318 254 2 55 53 2 50 5 1

REGION 7 91 93 0 20 20 2 11 9 0

REGION 8 553 1,949 0 444 421 16 284 160 5

REGION 9 701 1,291 10 246 190 17 182 64 0

REGION10 336 987 4 175 171 7 151 24 3

SUBTOTAL 2,626 5,662 1,179 1,083 848 331 11 18 49

NATIONAL TOTAL 611,449 1,718,833 488,496 463,060 388,331 18,029

Number of 

Active Tanks

Number of 

Closed Tanks

Confirmed Releases Cleanups 

Initiated

Cleanups Completed Emergency 

Responses

Cleanup 

Backlog

 100,165

Actions This Period Cumulative Actions This Period Cumulative

 7,168 12,944

UST Corrective Action Measures for End of Year FY 2009 (Cumulative as of September 30, 2009)

5

Definitions of confirmed releases, cleanups initiated, and cleanups completed are available on OUST's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/oust/cat/camarchv.htm.

 
13,994

70,623

99,038

128,149

149,960

162,550

171,795

164,112

162,977

167,480

168,361

161,997

150,085

142,709

136,265

129,828

0

20,00040,00060,00080,000

100,000120,000140,000160,000180,000200,000

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 

Years

National Backlog (Confirmed Releases - Cleanups 

Completed)

UST National Backlog: 

FY 1989 Thru End Of Year FY 2009
Region/ 

State

 % in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Prevention 

Regulations

 % in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Detection 

Regulations

 % of UST 

Facilities in 

SOC w/UST 

Release 

Detection and 

Release 

Prevention

ONE

*CT 83% 67% 62%

MA **DNA **DNA **DNA

ME 82% 63% 59%

NH 72% 73% 56%

*RI 85% 78% 70%

*VT 81% 84% 75%

SUBTOTAL 81% 71% 63%

TWO

NJ 89% 92% 84%

NY 75% 66% 58%

PR 76% 60% 54%

VI 92% 85% 77%

SUBTOTAL 80% 74% 66%

THREE

DC 78% 78% 65%

DE 82% 87% 77%

MD 78% 80% 70%

PA 89% 85% 76%

VA 76% 67% 58%

WV 68% 67% 54%

SUBTOTAL 81% 77% 67%

UST Compliance Measures 

for End-of-Year FY 2009 (as of 9/30/09)

Region/ 

State

% in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Prevention 

Requirements

 % in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Detection 

Regulations

 % of UST 

Facilities in 

SOC w/UST 

Release 

Detection and 

Release 

Prevention

FOUR

AL 95% 87% 85%

FL 92% 89% 88%

GA 81% 72% 66%

KY 57% 59% 40%

MS 70% 72% 58%

NC 71% 70% 62%

SC 85% 85% 76%

TN 85% 84% 75%

SUBTOTAL 81% 78% 71%

FIVE

*IL 79% 75% 60%

IN 80% 81% 67%

*MI 80% 56% 48%

MN 62% 71% 57%

OH 86% 69% 65%

*WI 83% 82% 71%

SUBTOTAL 79% 71% 61%

SIX

AR 62% 71% 52%

LA 85% 83% 68%

NM 67% 77% 57%

OK 70% 69% 56%

TX 78% 75% 68%

SUBTOTAL 76% 75% 64%

These compliance rates indicate the percentage of recently-inspected facitlities found to be in significant operational compliance (SOC) with federal UST 

requirements from 10/1/08 through 9/30/09. In accordance with EPA guidelines, states are allowed to report based on requirements more stringent than the 

federal SOC requirements. Connecticut, Illinois, Michigan, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin indicated they had done so, as described in the next page. 

Furthermore, states have different approaches to targeting inspections. For example, some states focus inspections on suspected non-compliant facilities, 

while other states conduct random inspections.

* States reporting based on requirements more stringent that the federal SOC requirements.

** DNA = Data Not Available N/A = Not Applicable
Region/ 

State

 % in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Prevention 

Regulations

 % in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Detection 

Regulations

 % of UST 

Facilities in 

SOC w/UST 

Release 

Detection and 

Release 

Prevention

SEVEN

IA 78% 80% 64%

KS 61% 91% 56%

MO 86% 97% 84%

NE 66% 61% 47%

SUBTOTAL 74% 83% 65%

EIGHT

CO 87% 78% 70%

MT 93% 94% 87%

ND 81% 76% 66%

SD 64% 80% 57%

UT 83% 82% 71%

WY 91% 94% 86%

SUBTOTAL 84% 83% 72%

NINE

AS **DNA **DNA **DNA

AZ 85% 86% 84%

CA 75% 82% 66%

CNMI 92% 100% 92%

GU 64% 68% 65%

HI 99% 94% 92%

NV 89% 86% 78%

SUBTOTAL 78% 83% 70%

UST Compliance Measures 

for End-of-Year FY 2009 (as of 9/30/09)

Region/ 

State

% in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Prevention 

Requirements

 % in 

Significant 

Operational 

Compliance 

with Release 

Detection 

Regulations

 % of UST 

Facilities in 

SOC w/UST 

Release 

Detection and 

Release 

Prevention

TEN

AK 83% 76% 67%

ID 73% 60% 47%

OR 92% 90% 85%

WA 80% 66% 58%

SUBTOTAL 82% 72% 64%

INDIAN COUNTRY

REGION 1 **DNA **DNA **DNA

REGION 2 **DNA **DNA **DNA

REGION 3 **N/A **N/A **N/A

REGION 4 85% 70% 60%

REGION 5 76% 54% 52%

REGION 6 91% 79% 73%

REGION 7 64% 73% 64%

REGION 8 85% 82% 73%

REGION 9 60% 70% 48%

REGION10 66% 66% 50%

SUBTOTAL 74% 71% 59%

NATIONAL TOTAL

National Total 79.3% 76.3% 66.4%

These compliance rates indicate the percentage of recently-inspected facitlities found to be in significant operational compliance (SOC) with federal UST 

requirements from 10/1/08 through 9/30/09. In accordance with EPA guidelines, states are allowed to report based on requirements more stringent than the 

federal SOC requirements. Connecticut, Illinois, Michigan, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Wisconsin indicated they had done so, as described in the next page. 

Furthermore, states have different approaches to targeting inspections. For example, some states focus inspections on suspected non-compliant facilities, 

while other states conduct random inspections.

* States reporting based on requirements more stringent that the federal SOC requirements.

** DNA = Data Not Available N/A = Not Applicable
States With Requirements More Stringent Than The Federal 

Significant Operational Compliance Requirements 

CONNECTICUT 

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection

• Lining not allowed. 

Release Detection: Testing 

• Tanks and piping require weekly and monthly monitoring for releases and records must be available 

(for 2 of the most recent consecutive months and for 8 of the last 12 months). 

• Statistical Inventory Reconciliation (SIR) not allowed as a stand-alone method. 

ILLINOIS 

Release Detection: Testing 

• Owner/operator must produce records within 30 minutes of arrival of inspector. 

MICHIGAN 

Release Detection 

• Inventory control is required when using an automatic tank gauge (ATG). 

RHODE ISLAND 

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance

• All tanks and piping are required to be tightness tested after a repair. No exemptions. 

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection 

• Impressed current cathodic protection systems are required to be tested every 2 years. 

• Sacrificial anode systems are required to be tested every 3 years. 

Release Detection: Testing 

• Records required for the past 36 months. 

• Inventory control is required for all tanks (single-walled and double-walled). 

• The automatic tank gauge (ATG) has to be checked monthly and have an annual test conducted. 

• Tightness testing schedule is different than the federal requirement; it depends on the type of tank. 

o Tank tightness must be performed on all single walled tanks. 

o Tightness tests must be performed every 5 years after the installation of the ATG until 

 the tank has been installed for 20 years and every 2 years thereafter. 

o UST systems upgraded with interior lining and/or cathodic protections are not 

 required to have an ATG for 10 years after the upgrade. Tank tightness testing must 

be conducted annually during these 10 years. After 10 years, an ATG is required and 

tank tightness testing must be performed every 5 years until the tank has been installed 

for 20 years and then every 2 years thereafter. The results of all tightness tests shall be 

maintained for 3 years beyond the life of the facility. 

• Groundwater or vapor monitoring not accepted as a method of leak detection. 

• SIR not accepted. 

VERMONT 

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection

• Lining not allowed unless with impressed current. 

Release Detection: Method Presence and Performance Requirements 

• Weekly monitoring required for tank and piping. Records must be available for the two most recent 

consecutive months and for 8 of the last 12 months. 

Release Detection: Testing 

• Inventory control /Tank Tightness Testing (TTT) not allowed as a release detection method after 

6/30/98. 

• Manual Tank Gauge (MTG) allowed alone up to 550 gallons; 551-1,000 gallons, MTG with annual 

TTT. 
WISCONSIN 

Release Prevention: Operation and Maintenance of Cathodic Protection 

• Require annual cathodic protection test. 

Release Prevention: Spill Prevention 

• Require USTs to be equipped with overfill prevention equipment that will operate as follows (NFPA 

30-2.6.1.4 – 2000 and 2003 version): 

o Automatically shut off the flow of liquid into the tank when the tank is no more than 95% 

full; 

o Alert the transfer operator when the tank is no more than 90% full by restricting the flow of 

liquid into the tank or triggering the high-level alarm; and, 

o Other methods approved by the authority having jurisdiction. 

Release Detection: Testing 

• Require NFPA 30A09.2.1 (2000 and 2003 versions). Accurate daily inventory records shall be 

maintained and reconciled for all liquid fuel storage tanks for indication of possible leakage from 

tanks or piping. The records shall be kept on the premises or shall be made available to the authority 

having jurisdiction for the inspection within 24 hours of a written or verbal request. The records 

shall include, as a minimum and by product, daily reconciliation between sales, use, receipts, and 

inventory on hand. If there is more than one storage system serving an individual pump or 

dispensing device for any product, the reconciliation shall be maintained separately for each system. 

Release Detection: Deferment 

• No exclusion or deferment for "remote" emergency generator tanks. 

Other 

• Require annual permit to operate that includes verification of financial responsibility. 
Region/ 

State

Number of 

On-Site 

Inspections 

Conducted 

Number of Delivery 

Prohibition Actions

ONE

CT 1,598 7

MA 553 0

ME 1,130 5

NH 373 11

RI 190 0

VT 383 6

SUBTOTAL 4,227 29

TWO

NJ 1,758 31

NY 3,099 0

PR 460 0

VI 30 0

SUBTOTAL 5,347 31

THREE

DC 29 12

DE 157 2

MD 1,429 10

PA 3,234 70

VA 2,282 0

WV 769 3

SUBTOTAL 7,900 97

FOUR

AL 3,199 151

Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions

for End-of-Year FY 2009 (as of 9/30/09)

Region/ 

State

Number of 

On-Site 

Inspections 

Conducted 

Number of Delivery 

Prohibition Actions

FL 12,841 0

GA 3,270 684

KY 1,820 0

MS 1,075 32

NC 2,806 93

SC 3,581 333

TN 2,720 138

SUBTOTAL 31,312 1,431

FIVE

IL 3,048 663

IN 1,755 0

MI 2,336 190

MN 2,053 14

OH 2,574 0

WI 4,224 201

SUBTOTAL 15,990 1,068

SIX

AR 1,613 329

LA 1,482 9

NM 927 0

OK 4,440 0

TX 573 2,811

SUBTOTAL 9,035 3,149

The inspection and delivery prohibition action reporting period is from 10/1/08 through 9/30/09. Not all states fully implement delivery prohibition at this 

time. Some states prohibit deliveries on a per tank basis, while others prohibit per facility. In addition, some states prohibit deliveries based on significant 

compliance violations, while others prohibit based on registration violations.

* DNA = Data Not Available N/A = Not Applicable
Region/ 

State

Number of 

On-Site 

Inspections 

Conducted 

Number of Delivery 

Prohibition Actions

SEVEN

IA 656 6

KS 893 1,355

MO 1,720 2

NE 618 0

SUBTOTAL 3,887 1,363

EIGHT

CO 1,986 0

MT 337 0

ND 587 0

SD 380 0

UT 822 9

WY 326 10

SUBTOTAL 4,438 19

NINE

AS 0 0

AZ 917 0

CA 7,904 DNA

CNMI 73 0

GU 51 0

HI 446 0

NV 1,084 0

SUBTOTAL 10,475 0

TEN

AK 159 135

Inspection/Delivery Prohibition Actions

for End-of-Year FY 2009 (as of 9/30/09)

Region/ 

State

Number of 

On-Site 

Inspections 

Conducted 

Number of Delivery 

Prohibition Actions

ID 408 0

OR 629 58

WA 1,489 0

SUBTOTAL 2,685 193

INDIAN COUNTRY

REGION 1 0 0

REGION 2 35 0

REGION 3 *N/A *N/A

REGION 4 38 0

REGION 5 47 0

REGION 6 33 0

REGION 7 31 0

REGION 8 76 0

REGION 9 72 0

REGION10 47 0

SUBTOTAL 379 0

NATIONAL TOTAL

National Total 95,675 7,380

The inspection and delivery prohibition action reporting period is from 10/1/08 through 9/30/09. Not all states fully implement delivery prohibition at this 

time. Some states prohibit deliveries on a per tank basis, while others prohibit per facility. In addition, some states prohibit deliveries based on significant 

compliance violations, while others prohibit based on registration violations.

* DNA = Data Not Available N/A = Not Applicable