Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2024 / Notices 79523 

3The Director, Office of Export Enforcement, is 

the authorizing official for issuance of denial orders 

pursuant to amendments to the Regulations (85 FR 

73411, November 18, 2020). 

1ECRA was enacted on August 13, 2018, as part 

of the John S. McCain National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, and as 

amended is codified at 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852. 

Exporter Services, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Bagrou’s export 

privileges under the Regulations for a 

period of 10 years from the date of 

Bagrou’s conviction. The Office of 

Exporter Services has also decided to 

revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which 

Bagrou had an interest at the time of his 

conviction.3

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

November 10, 2031, Dali Bagrou, with a 

last known address of 715 

Wellingbrough Court, Alpharetta, GA 

30005, and when acting for or on his 

behalf, his successors, assigns, 

employees, agents or representatives 

(‘‘the Denied Person’’), may not directly 

or indirectly participate in any way in 

any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, license exception, or export 

control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or engaging 

in any other activity subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or 

from any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of the Denied 

Person any item subject to the 

Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, pursuant to section 1760(e) of 

ECRA and sections 766.23 and 766.25 of 

the Regulations, any other person, firm, 

corporation, or business organization 

related to Bagrou by ownership, control, 

position of responsibility, affiliation, or 

other connection in the conduct of trade 

or business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order in order to 

prevent evasion of this Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with part 756 of 

the Regulations, Bagrou may file an 

appeal of this Order with the Under 

Secretary of Commerce for Industry and 

Security. The appeal must be filed 

within 45 days from the date of this 

Order and must comply with the 

provisions of part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Bagrou and shall be 

published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until November 10, 2031. 

John Sonderman, 

Director, Office of Export Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2024–22338 Filed 9–27–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

In the Matter of: Cerbando AcostaCarbajal, Inmate Number: 82716–051, 

FCI Bastrop, Federal Correctional 

Institution, P.O. Box 1010, Bastrop, TX 

78602; Order Denying Export 

Privileges 

On June 15, 2022, in the U.S. District 

Court for the District of New Mexico, 

Cerbando Acosta-Carbajal (‘‘AcostaCarbajal’’) was convicted of violating 18 

U.S.C. 554(a). Specifically, AcostaCarbajal was convicted of attempting to 

smuggle from the United States to 

Mexico, a Palmetto PSAK47 7.62 rifle; 

ACC Int/Intrac 7.62 rifle; Petronov 

Armament/DDI 47S 7.62 rifle; American 

Tactical M1911 GI–E .45 ACP handgun; 

Star BM 9 mm handgun; Beretta MOD 

M9A# 9mm handgun; 1,968 rounds 

7.62x39 ammunition; 1,361 rounds of 

.223 ammunition; nine 30-round 

7.62x39 AK rifle magazines; one 50- 

round AK drum magazine; nine 30- 

round .233 AR rifle magazines; two 8- 

round .45 caliber handgun magazines; 

seven 17-round 9 mm handgun 

magazines; and one 30-round 9mm 

handgun magazine without first having 

obtained a license and written 

authorization for such export. As a 

result of his conviction, the Court 

sentenced Acosta-Carbajal to 70 months 

of imprisonment, with credit for time 

served and three years of supervised 

release. 

Pursuant to section 1760(e) of the 

Export Control Reform Act (‘‘ECRA’’),1

the export privileges of any person who 

has been convicted of certain offenses, 

including, but not limited to, 18 U.S.C. 

554, may be denied for a period of up 

to ten (10) years from the date of his/her 

conviction. 50 U.S.C. 4819(e). In 

addition, any Bureau of Industry and 

Security (‘‘BIS’’) licenses or other 

authorizations issued under ECRA, in 

which the person had an interest at the 

time of the conviction, may be revoked. 

Id. 

BIS received notice of AcostaCarbajal’s conviction for violating 18 

U.S.C. 554. As provided in section 

766.25 of the Export Administration 

Regulations (‘‘EAR’’ or the 

‘‘Regulations’’), BIS provided notice and 

opportunity for Acosta-Carbajal to make 

a written submission to BIS. 15 CFR 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
79524 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 189 / Monday, September 30, 2024 / Notices 

2The Regulations are currently codified in the 

Code of Federal Regulations at 15 CFR parts 730– 

774 (2024). 

3The Director, Office of Export Enforcement, is 

the authorizing official for issuance of denial orders 

pursuant to amendments to the Regulations (85 FR 

73411, November 18, 2020). 

1See Certain Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents 

from the People’s Republic of China: Amended 

Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair 

Value and Antidumping Duty Order, 77 FR 27423 

(May 10, 2012). 

2See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review and Join Annual 

Inquiry Service List, 89 FR 35778 (May 2, 2024). 

3See Archroma’s Letter, ‘‘Request for 

Administrative Review,’’ dated May 31, 2024. 

766.25.2 BIS has not received a written 

submission from Acosta-Carbajal. 

Based upon my review of the record 

and consultations with BIS’s Office of 

Exporter Services, including its 

Director, and the facts available to BIS, 

I have decided to deny Acosta-Carbajal’s 

export privileges under the Regulations 

for a period of 10 years from the date of 

Acosta-Carbajal’s conviction. The Office 

of Exporter Services has also decided to 

revoke any BIS-issued licenses in which 

Acosta-Carbajal had an interest at the 

time of his conviction.3

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered: 

First, from the date of this Order until 

June 15, 2032, Cerbando AcostaCarbajal, with a last known address of 

Inmate Number: 82716–051, FCI 

Bastrop, Federal Correctional 

Institution, P.O. Box 1010, Bastrop, TX 

78602, and when acting for or on his 

behalf, his successors, assigns, 

employees, agents or representatives 

(‘‘the Denied Person’’), may not directly 

or indirectly participate in any way in 

any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

Regulations, including, but not limited 

to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license, license exception, or export 

control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the Regulations, or engaging 

in any other activity subject to the 

Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the Regulations, or 

from any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

Second, no person may, directly or 

indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of the Denied 

Person any item subject to the 

Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

the Denied Person of the ownership, 

possession, or control of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States, including financing or other 

support activities related to a 

transaction whereby the Denied Person 

acquires or attempts to acquire such 

ownership, possession or control; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from the Denied Person of 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been exported from the United 

States; 

D. Obtain from the Denied Person in 

the United States any item subject to the 

Regulations with knowledge or reason 

to know that the item will be, or is 

intended to be, exported from the 

United States; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the Regulations that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by the Denied 

Person, or service any item, of whatever 

origin, that is owned, possessed or 

controlled by the Denied Person if such 

service involves the use of any item 

subject to the Regulations that has been 

or will be exported from the United 

States. For purposes of this paragraph, 

servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification or 

testing. 

Third, pursuant to section 1760(e) of 

ECRA and sections 766.23 and 766.25 of 

the Regulations, any other person, firm, 

corporation, or business organization 

related to Acosta-Carbajal by ownership, 

control, position of responsibility, 

affiliation, or other connection in the 

conduct of trade or business may also be 

made subject to the provisions of this 

Order in order to prevent evasion of this 

Order. 

Fourth, in accordance with part 756 of 

the Regulations, Acosta-Carbajal may 

file an appeal of this Order with the 

Under Secretary of Commerce for 

Industry and Security. The appeal must 

be filed within 45 days from the date of 

this Order and must comply with the 

provisions of part 756 of the 

Regulations. 

Fifth, a copy of this Order shall be 

delivered to Acosta-Carbajal and shall 

be published in the Federal Register. 

Sixth, this Order is effective 

immediately and shall remain in effect 

until June 15, 2032. 

John Sonderman, 

Director, Office of Export Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2024–22335 Filed 9–27–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–972] 

Stilbenic Optical Brightening Agents 

From the People’s Republic of China: 

Rescission of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2023–2024 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the 

administrative review of the 

antidumping order on stilbenic optical 

brightening agents (OBAs) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China), 

covering the period of review (POR) 

May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024, 

because, as explained below, there are 

no reviewable entries for the companies 

that are subject to review. 

DATES: Applicable September 30, 2024. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Stephanie Trejo AD/CVD Operations, 

Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4390. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 10, 2012, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register the 

antidumping duty order on OBAs from 

China.1 On May 2, 2023, Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of opportunity to request an 

administrative review of the Order.2 On 

May 31, 2024, Commerce received a 

timely request from a U.S. producer of 

the domestic like product, Archroma, 

U.S., Inc. (Archroma), in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), to conduct 

an administrative review of the Order 

for five companies.3 We received no 

other requests for review. 

On July 5, 2024, in accordance with 

section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, 

as amended (the Act), Commerce 

published in the Federal Register a 

notice of initiation of the administrative 

review with respect to the five 

companies for which Archroma 

requested a review: (1) Beijing Odyssey 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1