alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023222EN.01003201.xml

| 26.6.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/32

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10823 – CLEARLAKE / TA ASSOCIATES / EPHESOFT)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2023/C 222/06)

On 12 August 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10823. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10823. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
**UNPUBLISHED**
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 1**  **0 -**  **7734**

RISHARD LEWIS GETER, Plaintiff

– Appellant ,

v. OFFICER TAHARRA, Jailer, Spartanburg County Detention Center, Defendant

– Appellee, and LARRY POWERS, Warden , Spartanburg County Detention Center; TERESA SPELLER, Captain, Spartanburg County Detention Center, Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Anderson

. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. ( 8 : 07

- cv - 03849

- JMC )

Submitted : April 19, 2011 Decided: May 3, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ , and DAVIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion

.2 Rishard Lewis Geter, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Todd Darwin, HOLCOMBE, BOMAR, GUNN & BRADFORD, PA, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM: Rishard Lewis Geter appeals a jury verdict in his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action against Officer Taharra of the Spa rtanburg County Detention Center. On appeal, Geter challenges several rulings of the district court and alleges the ineffectiveness of the attorney appointed to assist him. We affirm. We review evidentiary rulings by the district court for an abuse of di scretion. United States v. Basham , 561 F.3d 302, 325 (4th Cir. 2009). An abuse of discretion occurs when “the district court judge acted arbitrarily or irrationally in admitting [or excluding] evidence.” Id. at 326 (internal quotation marks omitted). H aving reviewed the informal briefs of the parties and the record before us, we perceive no such abuse of discretion in the challenged rulings of the district

court. Geter also challenges the effectiveness of counsel. However, there is no right to appoin tment of counsel in a civil case, and allegations of appointed counsel’s ineffective ness are not sufficient to raise a valid claim for relief on appeal. See Glick v. Henderson , 855 F.2d 536, 541 (8th Cir. 1988); Sanchez v. United States Postal Serv. , 785 F.2d 1236, 1237 (5th Cir. 1986). Therefore, these claims entitle Geter to no relief.4 Geter also alleges that he has new evidence that entitles him to a new trial. However, the material submitted to the court is not new, and therefore warrants no retrial. United States v. Custis , 988 F.2d 1355, 1359 (4th Cir. 1993) (“The standard for granting a new trial is well established in this circuit: [first,] the evidence must be, in fact, newly discovered, i.e., discovered since the trial.” ). Geter’s claims entitl e him to no relief, and we therefore affirm the judgment of the district court imposed on the jury verdict. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument woul d not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Laura Buss Sayavedra, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of
Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                  |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: May 8, 2009 |  |  |  | /S/    LAURA BUSS
SAYAVEDRA                                                                                                                                                                          
|                  |  |  |  | Laura Buss Sayavedra Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-71,488-02

EX PARTE ZIMBALISH ANTHONY SEGURA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 05-CR-1436-83-2 IN THE 10TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM GALVESTON COUNTY 

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Applicant was convicted of aggravated sexual assault of a child and sentenced to twenty-five

years’ imprisonment. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of

conviction, and the district clerk forwarded it to this Court. SeeTEX.CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 11.07. 

On April 27, 2020, the trial court entered an order designating issues. However, the

application was forwarded before the trial court made findings of fact and conclusions of law. We

remand this application to the trial court to complete its evidentiary investigation and make findings

of fact and conclusions of law.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX.R.APP.P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court. 

Filed: September 16, 2020

Do not publish
Exhibit 32






CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of  Southern Bella, Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) , as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, another document authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Company. and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.





Date: October 14, 2010
By:
/s/ Viola HeitzViola Heitz, President, Chief Executive Officer,Principal Financial Officer and PrincipalAccounting Officer and Director
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of SURFACE COATINGS, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  November 12, 2010





/s/ Rick Pietrykowski





Name: Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  November 12, 2010





/s/ Rick Pietrykowski





Name: Rick Pietrykowski


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
# Official Journal L 199I/2018

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 199I |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 617 August 2018 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 199I

English edition

Legislation

Volume 617 August 2018

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | REGULATIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1100 of 6 June 2018 amending the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 protecting against the effects of extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom | 1 |
| | * | Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1101 of 3 August 2018 laying down the criteria for the application of the second paragraph of Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 protecting against the effects of the extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom | 7 |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2018/1102 of 6 June 2018 amending Annex III to Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union, as regards Iran | 11 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

REGULATIONS

*

Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/1100 of 6 June 2018 amending the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 protecting against the effects of extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom

1

*

Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1101 of 3 August 2018 laying down the criteria for the application of the second paragraph of Article 5 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2271/96 protecting against the effects of the extra-territorial application of legislation adopted by a third country, and actions based thereon or resulting therefrom

7

DECISIONS

*

Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2018/1102 of 6 June 2018 amending Annex III to Decision No 466/2014/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council granting an EU guarantee to the European Investment Bank against losses under financing operations supporting investment projects outside the Union, as regards Iran

11

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 11.1


              BILLING INFORMATION CONCEPTS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

                       COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE

                    (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
                                  (UNAUDITED)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                            THREE MONTHS ENDED  SIX MONTHS ENDED
                                                                              MARCH 31, 1997     MARCH 31, 1997
                                                                              --------------     --------------
<S>                                                                              <C>                <C>    
PRIMARY EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION:
Net income applicable to common stock .......................................    $ 5,157            $10,068
                                                                                 =======            =======


Shares:
 Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding ..............     15,247             15,173
 Weighted average common stock equivalents applicable to stock options and
     warrants ...............................................................        997              1,047
                                                                                 -------            -------


 Weighted average shares used for computation ...............................     16,244             16,220
                                                                                 =======            =======


 Net income per common share ................................................    $  0.32            $  0.62


FULLY DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE CALCULATION:
Net income applicable to common stock .......................................    $ 5,157            $10,068


Shares:
 Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding ..............     15,247             15,173
 Weighted average common stock equivalents applicable to stock options and
     warrants ...............................................................        997              1,047
                                                                                 -------            -------


 Weighted average shares used for computation ...............................     16,244             16,220
                                                                                 =======            =======


 Net income per common share (a) ............................................    $  0.32            $  0.62
</TABLE>

Note:  Earnings per common share is  presented  above for the three and six 
       months ended March 31, 1997 only as Billing  Information Concepts Corp. 
       had no publicly held common shares outstanding prior to August 2, 1996.

(a)    This calculation is submitted in accordance with Regulation S-K item
       601(b)(11) although not required by footnote 2 to paragraph 14 of APB
       Opinion No. 15 because it results in dilution of less than 3%.


                                      17
quot-ex102_183.htm



 


		
	
Non-Employee Director – Initial Award
	
Exhibit 10.2




 

QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.

NOTICE OF GRANT OF RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

 

Quotient Technology Inc. (f/k/a Coupons.com Incorporated) (the “Company”) has granted to the Participant an award (the “Award”) of certain units pursuant to the Quotient Technology Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), each of which represents the right to receive on the applicable Settlement Date one (1) share of Stock, as follows: 

 


	
Participant:  
	
%%LAST_NAME%-%, %%FIRST_NAME%-% 

	
Date of Grant:

 
	
%%OPTION_DATE,'Month DD, YYYY'%-%

	
Total Number of Units:
	
%%TOTAL_SHARES_GRANTED,'999,999,999'%-%, subject to adjustment as provided by the Restricted Stock Units Agreement.

	
Settlement Date:
	
Except as provided by the Restricted Stock Units Agreement, the date on which a Unit becomes a Vested Unit.

	
Vesting Start Date: 
	
[Date Service Commences]

	
Vested Units:
	
Except as provided in the Restricted Stock Units Agreement or the Plan, and provided that the Participant’s Service as a Director has not terminated prior to the applicable date, the number of Vested Units (disregarding any resulting fractional Unit) as of any date is determined by multiplying the Total Number of Units by the “Vested Ratio” determined as of such date, as follows:

 

	
 
	
 
	
Vested Ratio

	
 
	
Prior to first anniversary of Vesting Start Date 
	
0

	
 
	
On first anniversary of Vesting Start Date (the “Initial Vesting Date”)
	
1/4

	
 
	
Plus
	
 

	
 
	
For each additional period of one year of the Participant’s Service from the Initial Vesting Date until the Vested Ratio equals 1/1, an additional
	
1/4




 

By their signatures below or by electronic acceptance or authentication in a form authorized by the Company, the Company and the Participant agree that the Award is governed by this Grant Notice and by the provisions of the Restricted Stock Units Agreement and the Plan, both of which are made a part of this document, and by the Superseding Agreement, if any.  The Participant acknowledges that copies of the Plan, the Restricted Stock Units Agreement and the prospectus for the Plan are available on the Company’s internal web site and may be viewed and printed by the Participant for attachment to the Participant’s copy of this Grant Notice.  The Participant represents that the Participant has read and is familiar with the provisions of the Restricted Stock Units Agreement and the Plan, and hereby accepts the Award subject to all of their terms and conditions.

 


	
QUOTIENT TECHNOLOGY INC.
	
 
	
PARTICIPANT

	
 
	
 
	
 

	
By:
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Connie Chen
	
 
	
Signature

	
 
	
General Counsel, Compliance Officer & Secretary
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
Date

	
Address:
	
400 Logue Avenue
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
Mountain View, California 94043
	
 
	
Address

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 




 


	
ATTACHMENTS:
	
2013 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended to the Date of Grant; Restricted Stock Units Agreement and Plan Prospectus




2013 EIP Notice of Grant of RSUs Directors Initial (rev 10302017)
Exhibit 32.2






CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)




--------------------------------------------------------------------




In connection with the Quarterly Report of United Mines, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Glenn E. Martin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.







Registrant

Date: May 24, 2011

United Mines, Inc.

By: /s/ Glenn E. MartinGlenn E. MartinChief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer,)
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00570-CR

Tommy Shawn RIECK,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR5851W

Honorable Philip A. Kazen Jr., Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE STONE, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE CHAPA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED.

SIGNED October 9, 2013.

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
**EXHIBIT 32.01**

** **

**Section 1350 Certification**

** **

**In connection with this quarterlyreport of ML Systematic Momentum LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (this “Report”), I, Paul Morton, Chief ExecutiveOfficer, President and Manager of Merrill Lynch Alternative Investments LLC,the manager of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

1. This Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in this Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: November 14, 2008                    |           |
|-------------------------------------------------|----------------|
|                                            |           |
| By                                              | /s/Paul Morton |   |
| Paul Morton                                     |           |
| Chief  Executive Officer, President and Manager |           |
| **(Principal Executive Officer)**               | ** **     |
|                                                 |                |  |

** **

----