alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3131 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, when issuing a 

research paper, to include all studies, data, and other analyses on which 

the paper was based. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 21, 2015 

Mr. FITZPATRICK introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Financial Services 

A BILL 

To require the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, 

when issuing a research paper, to include all studies, 

data, and other analyses on which the paper was based. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Bureau Research 

5 Transparency Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. RESEARCH PAPER TRANSPARENCY. 

7 Section 1013 of the Consumer Financial Protection 

8 Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5493) is amended by adding at 

9 the end the following: 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3131 IH

1 ‘‘(h) RESEARCH PAPER TRANSPARENCY.—Any time 

2 the Bureau, either through the research unit established 

3 by the Director under subsection (b)(1) or otherwise, 

4 issues a research paper that is available to the public, the 

5 Bureau shall accompany such paper with all studies, data, 

6 and other analyses on which the paper was based.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C., ss.1350 AS ADOPTED


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sunrise Holdings Limited (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Sunrise Holdings Limited.








Date: April 29, 2011


/s/ Shaojun SunShaojun Sun, Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT
32.1





CERTIFICATION
OF THE
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, J.
Wade Mezey,Chief Executive Officer of Forterus, Inc. (the "Company"), do hereby
certify to the best of my knowledge and belief that:





(1) The
Company’s 10-Q  (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and





(2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
August 18, 2008








By: /s/
Wade Mezey


-
----------------------


J. Wade
Mezey, CEO
114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3116 

AN ACT 

To extend by 15 years the authority of the Secretary of 

Commerce to conduct the quarterly financial report program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

•HR 3116 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Quarterly Financial 

3 Report Reauthorization Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF AUTHORITY FOR SECRETARY OF 

5 COMMERCE TO CONDUCT QUARTERLY FI6 NANCIAL REPORT PROGRAM. 

7 Section 4(b) of the Act entitled ‘‘An Act to amend 

8 title 13, United States Code, to transfer responsibility for 

9 the quarterly financial report from the Federal Trade 

10 Commission to the Secretary of Commerce, and for other 

11 purposes’’, approved January 12, 1983 (Public Law 97– 

12 454; 13 U.S.C. 91 note), is amended by striking ‘‘2015’’ 

13 and inserting ‘‘2030’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives September 24, 

2015. 

Attest: 

Clerk. 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3116 

AN ACT 

To extend by 15 years the authority of the Secnancial report program. retary of Commerce to conduct the quarterly fi-
FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROCIO BRENDA HENRIQUEZRIVAS,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER Jr., Attorney

General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71571

Agency No. A098-660-718

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. 

FILED

JAN 31 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
 Date:
November 14, 2007
    
    /s/ C. Gregory HarperC. Gregory HarperPresident and Chief Executive OfficerSpectra Energy Partners GP, LLCGeneral Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LPGeneral Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
----

            DECISION OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE No 75/2006

of 2 June 2006         

amending Protocol 47 to the EEA Agreement on the abolition of technical barriers to trade in wine

THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,

Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area as amended by the Protocol adjusting the Agreement on the European Economic Area, hereinafter referred to as ‘the Agreement’, and in particular Article 98 thereof,

Whereas:

HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:

Article 1

Protocol 47 to the Agreement shall be amended as specified in the Annex to this Decision.

Article 2

The texts of Regulations (EC) Nos 1493/1999, as corrected by OJ L 271, 21.10.1999, p. 47, 1607/2000, 1622/2000, 2451/2000, 884/2001, 1609/2001, 1655/2001, 2066/2001, 753/2002, as corrected by OJ L 272, 23.10.2003, p. 38, 2086/2002, 440/2003, 1205/2003, 1410/2003, 1793/2003, 1795/2003, 128/2004, 316/2004, 908/2004, 1427/2004, 1428/2004, 1429/2004 and 1991/2004 in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.

Article 3

This Decision shall enter into force on 3 June 2006, provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the Agreement have been made to the EEA Joint Committee (*1).

Article 4

This Decision shall be published in the EEA Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Brussels, 2 June 2006.

For the EEA Joint Committee

The President

R. WRIGHT            

----

(1)OJ L 315, 14.12.2000, p. 32.

(2)OJ L 179, 14.7.1999, p. 1.

(3)OJ L 185, 25.7.2000, p. 17.

(4)OJ L 194, 31.7.2000, p. 1.

(5)OJ L 282, 8.11.2000, p. 7.

(6)OJ L 128, 10.5.2001, p. 32.

(7)OJ L 212, 7.8.2001, p. 9.

(8)OJ L 220, 15.8.2001, p. 17.

(9)OJ L 278, 23.10.2001, p. 9.

(10)OJ L 118, 4.5.2002, p. 1.

(11)OJ L 321, 26.11.2002, p. 8.

(12)OJ L 66, 11.3.2003, p. 15.

(13)OJ L 168, 5.7.2003, p. 13.

(14)OJ L 201, 8.8.2003, p. 9.

(15)OJ L 262, 14.10.2003, p. 10.

(16)OJ L 262, 14.10.2003, p. 13.

(17)OJ L 19, 27.1.2004, p. 3.

(18)OJ L 55, 24.2.2004, p. 16.

(19)OJ L 163, 30.4.2004, p. 56.

(20)OJ L 263, 10.8.2004, p. 3.

(21)OJ L 263, 10.8.2004, p. 7.

(22)OJ L 263, 10.8.2004, p. 11.

(23)OJ L 344, 20.11.2004, p. 9.

(24)OJ L 272, 3.10.1990, p. 1

(*1)  No constitutional requirements indicated.

----

ANNEX

to Decision of the EEA Joint Committee No 75/2006

Appendix 1 to Protocol 47 shall be replaced by the following:

                     ‘Appendix 1

----

(*1)  without prejudice to the use of the German traditional expression “Federweißer” for grape must partially in fermentation intended for direct human consumption as provided for in paragraph 34c of the German Wine Regulation and in Articles 12(1)(b) and 14(1) of Commission Regulation (EC) No 753/2002, as amended.”         

----
**Exhibit 23.2**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMThe Board of Directors
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, R Steve Creamer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EnergySolutions,Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30,
2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects the financial condition and results of operations of EnergySolutions, Inc.

November 12,
2008

By:

/s/ R STEVE CREAMER R Steve Creamer,Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


I,
Philip O. Strawbridge, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
EnergySolutions, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition and results of operations of EnergySolutions, Inc.

November 12,
2008

By:

/s/ PHILIP O. STRAWBRIDGE Philip O. Strawbridge,Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer


A
signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to EnergySolutions, Inc. and will be
retained by EnergySolutions, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24
- 1415

TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL , Plaintiff

- Appellant ,

v. HUNTER WARFIELD, INC.; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC; EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INCORPORATED; EXPERIAN DATA CORPORATION; EXPERIAN SERVICES CORP.; TRANSUNION DATA SOLUTIONS LLC; TRANSUNION, LLC , Defendants

- Appellees

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III , District Judge. ( 5:23

- cv - 00732

- D

- BM )

Submitted : September 12, 2024 Decided: September 16, 2024

Before THACKER and RUSHING , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion

. Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Fristedt Barton, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Atlanta, Georgia; Caren D. Enloe, SMITH DEBNAM NARRON DRAKE SAINTSING & MYERS, LLP, Raleigh, North Carolina; Christy Cochran Dunn, Robert Cowan deRosset, IV, YOUNG MOORE & HENDERSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina; Camille R. Nicodemus, QUILLING SELANDER LOWNDS WINSLETT MOSER, USCA4 Appeal: 24-1415 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 1 of 32 Indianapolis, Indiana, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 24-1415 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 2 of 33 PER CURIAM: Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel seeks to appeal the district court’s order (a) dismissing McDaniel’s claims against the named credit reporting agencies; and (b) denying McDaniel’s motion for Judge Dever’s recusal. T his court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541, 545

- 46 (1949). T he appealed

- from order is not a final order given that litig ation on McDaniel’s claims remains ongoing against Defendant Hunter Warfield,
Inc

. And while McDaniel’s informal brief restates her allegations of judicial bias, that portion of the appealed

- from order

— specifically, Judge Dever’s denial of McDaniel’s recusal motion

— is not an immediately appealable interlocutory or collateral ruling

. See In re Va. Elec. & Power Co. , 539 F.2d 357, 363

- 64 (4th Cir. 1976) ; accord Mischler v.
Bevin , 887 F.3d 271, 271 (6th Cir. 2018) (per curiam) (“[A]n order denying recusal is not immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine.”). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED USCA4 Appeal: 24-1415 Doc: 20 Filed: 09/16/2024 Pg: 3 of 3
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6524

DARRELL THOMPSON,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

FRANK L. PERRY; MR. SUMMERS, Superintendent; MR. STANBACK, 

Asst. Superintendent,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle 

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, 

District Judge. (1:15-cv-00125-TDS-LPA)

Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015

Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darrell Thompson, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Darrell Thompson appeals the district court’s order denying 

relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. 

The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge 

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge 

recommended that relief be denied and advised Thompson that failure 

to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive 

appellate review of a district court order based upon the 

recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate 

judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review 

of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been 

warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins, 

766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 

U.S. 140 (1985). Thompson has waived appellate review by failing 

to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we 

affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT
REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported) August 14, 2007
 Cardtronics Inc.
  Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    333-113470
(Commission File Number)
    
    76-0681190
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 3110 Hayes Road, Suite 300, Houston, Texas
    
    77082(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 (281) 596-9988
 
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 2.02.
Results of Operations and Financial Condition.




---



##### 



SIGNATURE
  August
14,
2007
 CARDTRONICS, INC.(Registrant)/s/ J. CHRIS BREWSTERJ. Chris BrewsterChief Financial Officer
#### Hardgrove, Appellant, *v.*Isaly Dairy Co., Appellee.

(No. 28934

Decided May 13, 1942.)

*643
      *Messrs. Mots S Morris,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Wise, Roetsel & Mamón*and *Mr. William A. Kelly,*for appellee.

By the Court.

The contention here is that the Court of Appeals committed prejudicial error in entering final judgment for the defendant. This court cannot sustain the contention.

It is not claimed that there was any water on the floor when plaintiff entered the store. The dripping of the water on the linoleum or floor covering took place two minutes before plaintiff fell. There is no claim that the floor was unsafe or dangerous on that day prior to the time the water dripped and there is no proof that the defendant had actual notice that the water was on the floor. Two minutes would hardly be a reasonable time to wipe or mop up the water and certainly there would not be a lapse of sufficient time under the circumstances so that defendant could be said to have had constructive notice of the alleged slippery condition. Moreover, the failure to wipe the bottle off was the default or neglect of the customer. Under the circumstances no actionable negligence of the defendant was shown. Plaintiff saw and knew of the dripping of the water and did not use ordinary care to avoid slipping. We can only conclude that as a matter of law such want of care on her part was the sole and direct cause of the injury.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner,' Williams, Matthias, Hart and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
1

 The pe tition would als o be barred und er the pre vious thre e year statu te of limitation s. See

T.C.A. § 40-30 -102 (19 90) (rep ealed); Passa rella v. State, 891 S.W .2d 619 (Tenn . Crim. App.), perm . to

app. denied, (Tenn. 1994).

FILED

March 23, 2000

Cecil Crowson, Jr.

Appellate Court Clerk

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT JACKSON

ANTHONY TYRONE ANDERSON, )

)

Petitioner, ) C. C. A. NO. W1999-01730-CCA-R3-PC

)

 vs. ) MADISON COUNTY

)

STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) No. C99-182

)

Respondent. )

O R D E R

This matter is before the Court upon the state’s motion to affirm the trial

court judgment by order pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. In

1989, the petitioner was convicted on three counts of burglary and three counts of

larceny and received a forty-five year sentence. This Court affirmed the convictions

and sentences on appeal, State v. Anthony Tyrone Anderson, No. 3, Madison County

(Tenn. Crim. App., Apr. 25, 1990), and the Supreme Court denied permission to appeal

on July 30, 1990. On May 12, 1999, the petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction

relief. Finding that the statute of limitations has expired, the trial court dismissed the

petition.

Pursuant to T.C.A. § 40-30-202(a), a person in custody under a sentence

of a court of this state must petition for post-conviction relief within one year of the date

of the final action of the highest state appellate court to which an appeal is taken or, if

no appeal is taken, within one year of the date on which judgment became final. The

Post-Conviction Procedure Act provides several limited exceptions to the one-year

statute of limitations, however none of them are applicable to the present case. See §

40-30-202(b). The record reflects that the petition in this case was filed well beyond the

applicable statute of limitations, and is, therefore, untimely.1
2

Accordingly, we conclude that the trial court did not err in dismissing the

petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief. It is, therefore, ORDERED that the

judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed in accordance with Rule 20, Rules of the

Court of Criminal Appeals. Costs shall be taxed to the state.

_____________________________

DAVID G. HAYES, JUDGE

_____________________________

JOE G. RILEY, JUDGE

_____________________________

JOHN EVERETT WILLIAMS, JUDGE
EXHIBIT 99.1**Franklin Bank Corp. Prices Offering of Contingent Convertible Senior Notes**HOUSTON, April 12, 2007 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ — Franklin Bank Corp. (Franklin) (NASDAQ: FBTX)(AMEX:FBK-P) announced today that it has priced the public offering of $100,000,000 of 4%Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2027 at $1,000 per note, or 100%. The notes will bearinterest at the rate of 4% per annum, payable semiannually in arrears, and will be convertible, incertain circumstances, at a conversion price of $22.00 per share, subject to adjustment, whichrepresents a 40% conversion premium over the April 12 closing price of Franklin’s common stock of$15.70 per share. Unless Franklin has made an irrevocable election to physically settle, a holderwill receive cash and, in certain circumstances, common stock upon conversion of its notes. RBCCapital Markets Corporation and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. are the underwriters for the offering.Franklin expects the issuance and delivery of the notes to occur on April 18, 2007.Franklin intends to use the net proceeds from the offering to finance a portion of the purchaseprice of The First National Bank of Bryan in Bryan, Texas which is expected to close on or aboutApril 30, 2007.A written prospectus and prospectus supplement meeting the requirements of Section 10 of theSecurities Act of 1933 may be obtained from the following address or telephone number:RBC Capital Markets Corporation
EXHIBIT 32a

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18
of the United States Code

I,
Thomas M. OFlynn, Chief Financial Officer of Public Service Enterprise Group
Incorporated, to the best of my knowledge, certify that (i) the Annual Report
of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Public Service Enterprise
Group Incorporated.

| |                                              
| | ---------------------------------------------
| | /s/
 Thomas M. OFlynn                       
| |                                              
| | Thomas M. OFlynn                            
| | Public
 Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
| | Chief
 Financial Officer                     
| | February
 26, 2009                           

---
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3073 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3073

 To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary 
                    cities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 15, 2015

Mr. DesJarlais introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
    Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on 
   Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently 
   determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such 
 provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To prohibit the receipt of Federal financial assistance by sanctuary 
                    cities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sanctuary City All Funding 
Elimination Act of 2015'' or the ``SAFE Act of 2015''.

SEC. 2. NO FEDERAL FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SANCTUARY CITIES.

    Any State or local government that is not in compliance with 
section 642 of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant 
Responsibility Act of 1996 (8 U.S.C. 1373) may not receive any Federal 
financial assistance (as such term is defined in section 7501(a)(5) of 
title 31, United States Code) until the State or local government has 
produced a comprehensive plan to come back into compliance with such 
section 642.
                                 <all>
```