Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 25, 2024 / Notices 78283 

1On August 13, 2018, the President signed into 

law the John S. McCain National Defense 

Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which 

includes the Export Control Reform Act of 2018, 50 

U.S.C. 4801–4852 (‘‘ECRA’’). While section 1766 of 

ECRA repeals the provisions of the Export 

Administration Act, 50 U.S.C. app. sec. 2401 et seq. 

(‘‘EAA’’), (except for three sections which are 

inapplicable here), section 1768 of ECRA provides, 

in pertinent part, that all orders, rules, regulations, 

and other forms of administrative action that were 

made or issued under the EAA, including as 

continued in effect pursuant to the International 

Emergency Economic Powers Act, 50 U.S.C. 1701 

et seq. (‘‘IEEPA’’), and were in effect as of ECRA’s 

date of enactment (August 13, 2018), shall continue 

in effect according to their terms until modified, 

superseded, set aside, or revoked through action 

undertaken pursuant to the authority provided 

under ECRA. Moreover, section 1761(a)(5) of ECRA 

authorizes the issuance of temporary denial orders. 

50 U.S.C. 4820(a)(5). 

2The TDO was published in the Federal Register 

on April 12, 2022 (87 FR 21611). 

3The October 3, 2022 renewal order, which was 

effective upon issuance, was published in the 

Federal Register on October 7, 2022 (87 FR 60985). 

4The March 29, 2023 renewal order, which was 

also effective upon issuance, was published in the 

Federal Register on April 3, 2023 (88 FR 19609). 

5The September 23, 2023 renewal order, which 

was effective upon issuance, was published in the 

Federal Register on September 28, 2023 (88 FR 

66807). 

6Section 766.24(d) provides that BIS may seek 

renewal of a temporary denial order for additional 

180-day renewal periods, if it believes that renewal 

is necessary in the public interest to prevent an 

imminent violation. In cases demonstrating a 

pattern of repeated, ongoing and/or continuous 

apparent violations, BIS may request the renewal of 

a temporary denial order for an additional period 

not exceeding one year. 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; 

D. Obtain from Azur in the United 

States any item subject to the EAR with 

knowledge or reason to know that the 

item will be, or is intended to be, 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by Azur, or 

service any item, of whatever origin, 

that is owned, possessed or controlled 

by Azur if such service involves the use 

of any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States except directly related to 

safety of flight and authorized by BIS 

pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of the 

Regulations. For purposes of this 

paragraph, servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification, or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Azur by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

sections 766.24(e) of the EAR, Azur 

may, at any time, appeal this Order by 

filing a full written statement in support 

of the appeal with the Office of the 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast 

Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South 

Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202– 

4022. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. A renewal 

request may be opposed by Azur as 

provided in section 766.24(d), by filing 

a written submission with the Assistant 

Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement, which must be received 

not later than seven days before the 

expiration date of the Order. 

A copy of this Order shall be provided 

to Azur, and shall be published in the 

Federal Register. 

This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect for one year. 

Matthew S. Axelrod, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21949 Filed 9–24–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

Bureau of Industry and Security 

PJSC Aeroflot, 1 Arbat St., 119019, 

Moscow, Russia; Order Renewing 

Temporary Denial of Export Privileges 

Pursuant to section 766.24 of the 

Export Administration Regulations, 15 

CFR parts 730–774 (‘‘EAR’’ or ‘‘the 

Regulations’’),1 I hereby grant the 

request of the Office of Export 

Enforcement (‘‘OEE’’) to renew the 

temporary denial order (‘‘TDO’’) issued 

in this matter on April 7, 2022. I find 

that renewal of this order is necessary 

in the public interest to prevent an 

imminent violation of the Regulations 

and that renewal for an extended period 

is appropriate because PJSC Aeroflot 

(‘‘Aeroflot’’) has engaged in a pattern of 

repeated, ongoing and/or continuous 

apparent violations of the EAR. 

I. Procedural History 

On April 7, 2022, I signed an order 

denying Aeroflot export privileges for a 

period of 180 days on the ground that 

issuance of the order was necessary in 

the public interest to prevent an 

imminent violation of the Regulations. 

The order was issued ex parte pursuant 

to section 766.24(a) of the Regulations 

and was effective upon issuance.2 The 

temporary denial order was 

subsequently renewed on October 3, 

2022,3 March 29, 2023,4 and September 

23, 2023 5 in accordance with section 

766.24(d) of the Regulations.6

On August 27, 2024, BIS, through 

OEE, submitted a written request for a 

fourth renewal of the TDO. The written 

request was made more than 20 days 

before the TDO’s scheduled expiration 

and, given the temporary suspension of 

international mail service to Russia, 

OEE has attempted to deliver a copy of 

the renewal request to Aeroflot by 

alternative means in accordance with 

sections 766.5 and 766.24(d) of the 

Regulations. No opposition to the 

renewal of the TDO has been received. 

II. Renewal of the TDO 

A. Legal Standard 

Pursuant to section 766.24, BIS may 

issue an order temporarily denying a 

respondent’s export privileges upon a 

showing that the order is necessary in 

the public interest to prevent an 

‘‘imminent violation’’ of the 

Regulations, or any order, license or 

authorization issued thereunder. 15 CFR 

766.24(b)(1) and 766.24(d). ‘‘A violation 

may be ‘imminent’ either in time or 

degree of likelihood.’’ 15 CFR 

766.24(b)(3). BIS may show ‘‘either that 

a violation is about to occur, or that the 

general circumstances of the matter 

under investigation or case under 

criminal or administrative charges 

demonstrate a likelihood of future 

violations.’’ Id. As to the likelihood of 

future violations, BIS may show that the 

violation under investigation or charge 

‘‘is significant, deliberate, covert and/or 

likely to occur again, rather than 

technical or negligent[.]’’ Id. A ‘‘lack of 

information establishing the precise 

time a violation may occur does not 

preclude a finding that a violation is 

imminent, so long as there is sufficient 

reason to believe the likelihood of a 

violation.’’ Id. 

If BIS believes that renewal of a denial 

order is necessary in the public interest 

to prevent an imminent violation, it may 

file a written request for renewal, with 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
78284 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 25, 2024 / Notices 

7 88 FR 59791 (Aug. 30, 2023). 

8 87 FR 12226 (Mar. 3, 2022). Additionally, BIS 

published a final rule effective April 8, 2022, which 

imposed licensing requirements on items controlled 

on the Commerce Control List (‘‘CCL’’) under 

Categories 0–2 that are destined for Russia or 

Belarus. Accordingly, now all CCL items require 

export, reexport, and transfer (in-country) licenses 

if destined for or within Russia or Belarus. 87 FR 

22130 (Apr. 14, 2022). 

9 87 FR 13048 (Mar. 8, 2022). 

10Publicly available flight tracking information 

shows that on March 6, 2022, serial number (SN) 

65309 flew from Beijing, China to Moscow, Russia, 

and SN 41690 flew from Dubai, UAE to Moscow, 

Russia. In addition, on March 7, 2022, SN 63511 

flew from Delhi, India to Moscow, Russia. 11Engaging in conduct prohibited by a denial 

order violates the Regulations. 15 CFR 764.2(a) and 

(k). 12Publicly available flight tracking information 

shows that SN 41690 flew from Istanbul, Turkey to 

Moscow, Russia on September 20, 2022 and from 

Delhi, India to Moscow, Russia on September 23, 

2022. In addition, on September 1, 2022, SN 41214 

flew from Minsk, Belarus to Moscow, Russia. On 

September 13, 2022, SN 41214 flew from Moscow, 

Russia to Sochi, Russia. 

13Publicly available flight tracking information 

shows that SN 41214 flew from Yerevan, Armenia 

to Moscow, Russia on February 16, 2023 and from 

Urgench, Uzbekistan to Moscow, Russia on March 

1, 2023. In addition, on March 2, 2023, SN 41214 

flew from Moscow, Russia to Sochi, Russia. On 

February 4, 2023, SN 41690 flew from Bangkok, 

Thailand to Moscow, Russia. On March 5, 2023 and 

March 19, 2023, respectively, SNs 65309 and 41690 

flew from Shanghai, China to Moscow, Russia. 

14Publicly available flight tracking information 

shows that on August 31, 2023, SN 41690 flew from 

Beijing, China to Moscow Russia. On September 19, 

2023, SN 65309 flew from Delhi, India to Moscow, 

Russia. On September 17, 2023, SN 65307 flew from 

Antalya, Turkey to Moscow, Russia. 

any modifications if appropriate. 15 

CFR 766.24(d)(1). The written request, 

which must be filed no later than 20 

days prior to the TDO’s expiration, 

should set forth the basis for BIS’s belief 

that renewal is necessary, including any 

additional or changed circumstances. Id. 

‘‘In cases demonstrating a pattern of 

repeated, ongoing and/or continuous 

apparent violations, BIS may request the 

renewal of a temporary denial order for 

an additional period not exceeding one 

year.’’ 7 Id. 

B. The TDO and BIS’s Request for 

Renewal 

The U.S. Commerce Department, 

through BIS, responded to the Russian 

Federation’s (‘‘Russia’s’’) further 

invasion of Ukraine by implementing a 

sweeping series of stringent export 

controls that severely restrict Russia’s 

access to technologies and other items 

that it needs to sustain its aggressive 

military capabilities. These controls 

primarily target Russia’s defense, 

aerospace, and maritime sectors and are 

intended to cut off Russia’s access to 

vital technological inputs, atrophy key 

sectors of its industrial base, and 

undercut Russia’s strategic ambitions to 

exert influence on the world stage. 

Effective February 24, 2022, BIS 

imposed expansive controls on aviationrelated (e.g., Commerce Control List 

Categories 7 and 9) items to Russia, 

including a license requirement for the 

export, reexport or transfer (in-country) 

to Russia of any aircraft or aircraft parts 

specified in Export Control 

Classification Number (‘‘ECCN’’) 9A991 

(section 746.8(a)(1) of the EAR).8 BIS 

will review any export or reexport 

license applications for such items 

under a policy of denial. See section 

746.8(b). Effective March 2, 2022, BIS 

excluded any aircraft registered in, 

owned, or controlled by, or under 

charter or lease by Russia or a national 

of Russia from being eligible for license 

exception Aircraft, Vessels, and 

Spacecraft (‘‘AVS’’) (section 740.15 of 

the EAR).9 Accordingly, any U.S.-origin 

aircraft or foreign aircraft that includes 

more than 25% controlled U.S.-origin 

content, and that is registered in, 

owned, or controlled by, or under 

charter or lease by Russia or a national 

of Russia, is subject to a license 

requirement before it can travel to 

Russia. 

OEE’s request for renewal for a period 

of one year is based upon the facts 

underlying the issuance of the TDO and 

the renewal orders subsequently issued 

in this matter on October 3, 2022, March 

29, 2023, and September 23, 2023, as 

well as other evidence developed during 

this investigation. This evidence 

demonstrates that Aeroflot has 

continued, and continues, to act in 

blatant disregard for U.S. export 

controls and the terms of previously 

issued TDOs. Specifically, the initial 

TDO, issued on April 7, 2022, was based 

on evidence that Aeroflot engaged in 

conduct prohibited by the Regulations 

by operating multiple aircraft subject to 

the EAR and classified under ECCN 

9A991.b on flights into Russia after 

March 2, 2022 from destinations 

including, but not limited to, Beijing, 

China, Delhi, India, and Dubai, United 

Arab Emirates, without the required BIS 

authorization.10 Further evidence 

indicated that Aeroflot also operated 

aircraft subject to the EAR on domestic 

flights within Russia, potentially in 

violation of section 736.2(b)(10) of the 

Regulations. 

As discussed in the prior renewal 

orders, BIS presented evidence 

indicating that, after the initial TDO 

issued, Aeroflot continued to operate 

aircraft subject to the EAR and classified 

under ECCN 9A991.b on flights both 

into and within Russia, in violation of 

the Regulations and the TDO itself.11

The October 3, 2022 order detailed 

flights into and out of Russia from/to 

Minsk, Belarus, Delhi, India, and 

Istanbul, Turkey, as well as within 

Russia.12 The March 29, 2023 order 

detailed flights into and out of Russia 

from/to Yerevan, Armenia, Shanghai, 

China, Bangkok, Thailand, and Urgench, 

Uzebekistan, as well as within Russia.13

Similarly, the September 23, 2023 order 

detailed flights into and out of Russia 

from/to Beijing, China, Delhi, India, and 

Antalya, Turkey.14

Since that time, Aeroflot continued to 

engage in conduct prohibited by the 

TDO and Regulations. In its August 27, 

2024 request for TDO renewal, BIS 

submitted evidence that Aeroflot 

continues to operate aircraft subject to 

the EAR and classified under ECCN 

9A991.b, both on flights into and within 

Russia, in violation of the September 23, 

2023 renewal order and/or the 

Regulations. Specifically, BIS’s evidence 

and related investigation demonstrates 

that Aeroflot continued to operate 

aircraft subject to the EAR, including, 

but not limited to, on flights into and 

out of Russia from/to Antalya, Turkey, 

Guangzhou, China, and Bangkok, 

Thailand as well as domestically within 

Russia. Information about those flights 

includes, but is not limited to, the 

following: 

Tail No. Serial No. Aircraft type Departure/arrival cities Dates 

RA–73126 ........................... 41214 737–8LJ (B738) .................. Nizhny Novgorod, RU/Antalya, TR ........... September 10, 2024. 

RA–73126 ........................... 41214 737–8LJ (B738) .................. Moscow, RU/Ufa, RU ............................... September 8, 2024. 

RA–73126 ........................... 41214 737–8LJ (B738) .................. Moscow, RU/Tashkent, UZ ....................... August 14, 2024. 

RA–73126 ........................... 41214 737–8LJ (B738) .................. Antalya, TR/Novosibirsk, RU .................... August 13, 2024. 

RA–73126 ........................... 41214 737–8LJ (B738) .................. Sharm el-Sheikh, EG/Moscow, RU .......... August 9, 2024. 

RA–73144 ........................... 41690 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Antalya, TR/Moscow, RU ......................... September 10, 2024. 

RA–73144 ........................... 41690 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Vladivostok, RU/Moscow, RU ................... September 9, 2024. 

RA–73144 ........................... 41690 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Moscow, Russia/Guangzhou, China ........ August 10, 2024. 

RA–73144 ........................... 41690 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Istanbul, TR/Moscow, RU ......................... August 6, 2024. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 25, 2024 / Notices 78285 

Tail No. Serial No. Aircraft type Departure/arrival cities Dates 

RA–73144 ........................... 41690 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Phuket, TH/Moscow, RU .......................... July 30, 2024. 

RA–73146 ........................... 65309 777–300 (ER) (B77W) ........ Antalya, TR/Moscow, RU ......................... September 10, 2024. 

RA–73146 ........................... 65309 777–300 (ER) (B77W) ........ Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk, RU/Moscow, RU ...... September 6, 2024. 

RA–73146 ........................... 65309 777–300 (ER) (B77W) ........ Antalya, TR/Moscow, RU ......................... August 13, 2024. 

RA–73146 ........................... 65309 777–300 (ER) (B77W) ........ Male, MV/Moscow, RU ............................. August 5, 2024. 

RA–73146 ........................... 65309 777–300 (ER) (B77W) ........ Bangkok, TH/Moscow, RU ....................... August 4, 2024. 

RA–73150 ........................... 65307 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Antalya, TR/Moscow, RU ......................... September 6, 2024. 

RA–73150 ........................... 65307 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky, RU/Moscow, 

RU.

September 5, 2024. 

RA–73150 ........................... 65307 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Vladivostok, RU/Moscow, RU ................... August 13, 2024. 

RA–73150 ........................... 65307 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Istanbul, TR/Moscow, RU ......................... August 11, 2024. 

RA–73150 ........................... 65307 777–3M0 (ER) (B77W) ....... Antalya, TR/Moscow, RU ......................... August 10, 2024. 

III. Findings 

Under the applicable standard set 

forth in section 766.24 of the 

Regulations and my review of the entire 

record, I find that the evidence 

presented by BIS convincingly 

demonstrates that Aeroflot has acted in 

violation of the Regulations and the 

TDO; that such violations have been 

significant and deliberate; and that 

given the foregoing and the nature of the 

matters under investigation, there is a 

likelihood of imminent violations. 

Moreover, I find that renewal for an 

extended period is appropriate because 

Aeroflot has engaged in a pattern of 

repeated, ongoing and/or continuous 

apparent violations of the EAR. 

Therefore, renewal of the TDO for one 

year is necessary in the public interest 

to prevent imminent violation of the 

Regulations and to give notice to 

companies and individuals in the 

United States and abroad that they 

should avoid dealing with Aeroflot, in 

connection with export and reexport 

transactions involving items subject to 

the Regulations and in connection with 

any other activity subject to the 

Regulations. 

IV. Order 

It is therefore ordered: 

First, PJSC Aeroflot, 1 Arbat St., 

119019, Moscow, Russia, when acting 

for or on their behalf, any successors or 

assigns, agents, or employees may not, 

directly or indirectly, participate in any 

way in any transaction involving any 

commodity, software or technology 

(hereinafter collectively referred to as 

‘‘item’’) exported or to be exported from 

the United States that is subject to the 

EAR, or in any other activity subject to 

the EAR including, but not limited to: 

A. Applying for, obtaining, or using 

any license (except directly related to 

safety of flight), license exception, or 

export control document; 

B. Carrying on negotiations 

concerning, or ordering, buying, 

receiving, using, selling, delivering, 

storing, disposing of, forwarding, 

transporting, financing, or otherwise 

servicing in any way, any transaction 

involving any item exported or to be 

exported from the United States that is 

subject to the EAR except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations, or engaging in any 

other activity subject to the EAR except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

C. Benefitting in any way from any 

transaction involving any item exported 

or to be exported from the United States 

that is subject to the EAR, or from any 

other activity subject to the EAR except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations. 

Second, that no person may, directly 

or indirectly, do any of the following: 

A. Export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) to or on behalf of Aeroflot any 

item subject to the EAR except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations; 

B. Take any action that facilitates the 

acquisition or attempted acquisition by 

Aeroflot of the ownership, possession, 

or control of any item subject to the EAR 

that has been or will be exported from 

the United States, including financing 

or other support activities related to a 

transaction whereby Aeroflot acquires 

or attempts to acquire such ownership, 

possession or control except directly 

related to safety of flight and authorized 

by BIS pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of 

the Regulations; 

C. Take any action to acquire from or 

to facilitate the acquisition or attempted 

acquisition from Aeroflot of any item 

subject to the EAR that has been 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; 

D. Obtain from Aeroflot in the United 

States any item subject to the EAR with 

knowledge or reason to know that the 

item will be, or is intended to be, 

exported from the United States except 

directly related to safety of flight and 

authorized by BIS pursuant to section 

764.3(a)(2) of the Regulations; or 

E. Engage in any transaction to service 

any item subject to the EAR that has 

been or will be exported from the 

United States and which is owned, 

possessed or controlled by Aeroflot, or 

service any item, of whatever origin, 

that is owned, possessed or controlled 

by Aeroflot if such service involves the 

use of any item subject to the EAR that 

has been or will be exported from the 

United States except directly related to 

safety of flight and authorized by BIS 

pursuant to section 764.3(a)(2) of the 

Regulations. For purposes of this 

paragraph, servicing means installation, 

maintenance, repair, modification, or 

testing. 

Third, that, after notice and 

opportunity for comment as provided in 

section 766.23 of the EAR, any other 

person, firm, corporation, or business 

organization related to Aeroflot by 

ownership, control, position of 

responsibility, affiliation, or other 

connection in the conduct of trade or 

business may also be made subject to 

the provisions of this Order. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

sections 766.24(e) of the EAR, Aeroflot 

may, at any time, appeal this Order by 

filing a full written statement in support 

of the appeal with the Office of the 

Administrative Law Judge, U.S. Coast 

Guard ALJ Docketing Center, 40 South 

Gay Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202– 

4022. 

In accordance with the provisions of 

section 766.24(d) of the EAR, BIS may 

seek renewal of this Order by filing a 

written request not later than 20 days 

before the expiration date. A renewal 

request may be opposed by Aeroflot as 

provided in section 766.24(d), by filing 

a written submission with the Assistant 

Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement, which must be received 

not later than seven days before the 

expiration date of the Order. 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
78286 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 186 / Wednesday, September 25, 2024 / Notices 

1See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, 

Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity 

To Request Administrative Review, 89 FR 54437 

(July 1, 2024). 

2 Id., 89 FR 54437, 54438. 

3 Id., 89 FR 54437, 54439. 

A copy of this Order shall be provided 

to Aeroflot, and shall be published in 

the Federal Register. 

This Order is effective immediately 

and shall remain in effect for one year. 

Matthew S. Axelrod, 

Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Export 

Enforcement. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21948 Filed 9–24–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

United States-Mexico-Canada 

Agreement (USMCA), Article 10.12: 

Binational Panel Review: Notice of 

Request for Panel Review 

AGENCY: United States Section, USMCA 

Secretariat, International Trade 

Administration, Department of 

Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice of USMCA request for 

panel review. 

SUMMARY: A Request for Panel Review 

was filed in the matter of Certain 

Softwood Lumber Products from 

Canada: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Administrative Review, 

and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2022 with the U.S. Section 

of the USMCA Secretariat on September 

18, 2024. The USMCA Secretariat has 

assigned case number USA–CDA–2024– 

10.12–04 to this request. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Vidya Desai, United States Secretary, 

USMCA Secretariat, Room 2061, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, 202–482–5438. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final 

results of the investigation under review 

were determined by the United States 

Department of Commerce and were 

published in the Federal Register on 

August 19, 2024 (89 FR 67067). 

Article 10.12 of chapter 10 of USMCA 

provides a dispute settlement 

mechanism involving trade remedy 

determinations issued by the 

Government of the United States, the 

Government of Canada, and the 

Government of Mexico. Following a 

Request for Panel Review, a Binational 

Panel is composed to review the trade 

remedy determination being challenged 

and issue a binding Panel Decision. 

There are established USMCA Rules of 

Procedure for Article 10.12 (Binational 

Panel Reviews), which were adopted by 

the three governments for panels 

requested pursuant to Article 10.12(2) of 

USMCA which requires Requests for 

Panel Review to be published in 

accordance with Rule 40. For the 

complete Rules, please see https://canmex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreementaccord-acuerdo/usmca-aceum-tmec/ 

rules-regles-reglas/article-articlearticulo_10_12.aspx?lang=eng. 

The Rules provide that: 

(a) A Party or interested person may 

challenge the final determination in 

whole or in part by filing a Complaint 

in accordance with Rule 44 no later than 

30 days after the filing of the first 

Request for Panel Review (the deadline 

for filing a Complaint is October 18, 

2024); 

(b) A Party, an investigating authority 

or other interested person who does not 

file a Complaint but who intends to 

participate in the panel review shall file 

a Notice of Appearance in accordance 

with Rule 45 no later than 45 days after 

the filing of the first Request for Panel 

Review (the deadline for filing a Notice 

of Appearance is November 4, 2024); 

(c) The panel review will be limited 

to the allegations of error of fact or law, 

including challenges to the jurisdiction 

of the investigating authority, that are 

set out in the Complaints filed in the 

panel review and to the procedural and 

substantive defenses raised in the panel 

review. 

Dated: September 19, 2024. 

Vidya Desai, 

United States Secretary, USMCA Secretariat. 

[FR Doc. 2024–21912 Filed 9–24–24; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–129, C–489–806] 

Notice of Opportunity To Request 

Administrative Review; Correction and 

Extension of Certain Deadlines: 

Certain Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and 

Parts Thereof From the People’s 

Republic of China and Certain Pasta 

From the Republic of Tu ̈rkiye 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

ACTION: Notice; correction. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) published a 

notice in the Federal Register of July 1, 

2024, of opportunity to request 

administrative reviews of orders, 

findings, or suspended investigations 

(opportunity notice). This notice 

inadvertently omitted listing the 

antidumping duty (AD) order on certain 

walk-behind lawn mowers and parts 

thereof (Lawn Mowers) from the 

People’s Republic of China (China). This 

notice also inadvertently listed an 

incorrect period of review (POR) for the 

countervailing duty (CVD) order on 

certain pasta (Pasta) from the Republic 

of Tu ̈rkiye (Tu ̈rkiye). Commerce is 

extending certain deadlines identified 

in the opportunity notice due to these 

errors. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD 

Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Each year during the anniversary 

month of the publication of an AD or 

CVD order, finding, or suspended 

investigation, an interested party, as 

defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended, may request, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.213, that 

Commerce conduct an administrative 

review of that AD or CVD order, finding, 

or suspended investigation. Commerce 

notifies interested parties of the 

opportunity to request administrative 

review with the publication a Federal 

Register notice. The opportunity notice 

published on July 1, 2024, for AD and 

CVD orders with a July anniversary 

month, inadvertently did not provide 

notice of opportunity to request 

administrative review of the AD order 

on Lawn Mowers from China for the 7/ 

1/2023 through 6/30/2024 POR.1 This 

notice also inadvertently listed an 

incorrect POR for the CVD order on 

Pasta from Tu ̈rkiye. 

Correction 

In the Federal Register of July 1, 

2024, in FR Doc. 2024–14404, on page 

54438, correct the table by adding the 

following under the subheading ‘‘The 

People’s Republic of China:’’ ‘‘Certain 

Walk-Behind Lawn Mowers and Parts 

Thereof, A–570–129; POR 7/1/23–6/30/ 

24,’’ 2 and on page 54439, correct the 

table by changing the POR from 1/1/22– 

12/31/22, to 1/1/23–12/31/23.3

Extension of Time 

Unless specifically identified below, 

the deadlines identified in the July 1, 

2024 opportunity notice are unchanged. 

Interested parties to the Lawn Mowers 

from China AD order and the Pasta from 


ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1