alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.2**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of MAP VI Acquisition, Inc. (the “Company”)
      on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Lawrence E. Koehler, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my
      knowledge:





(1)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




November
                13, 2007
            /s/
                Lawrence E. KoehlerLawrence
                E. KoehlerPrincipal
                Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its Staff upon request.





Date: August 24, 2007
        
        
        /S/ M. J. CohenM. J. CohenChief Executive Officer




---
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 324 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 

11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, as the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. 

Riordan Post Office’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 13, 2015 

Mrs. WAGNER (for herself, Mrs. HARTZLER, Mr. CLAY, Mr. SMITH of Missouri, Mr. LUETKEMEYER, Mr. LONG, Mr. CLEAVER, and Mr. GRAVES

of Missouri) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

A BILL 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service 

located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. Louis, Missouri, 

as the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. LT. DANIEL P. RIORDAN POST OFFICE. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States 

5 Postal Service located at 11662 Gravois Road in St. 

6 Louis, Missouri, shall be known and designated as the 

7 ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan Post Office’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 324 IH

1 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg2 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

3 States to the facility referred to in subsection (a) shall 

4 be deemed to be a reference to the ‘‘Lt. Daniel P. Riordan 

5 Post Office’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
VICTOR WILSON

,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

,

Respondent.

___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 1 812

Opinion filed May 13, 2015.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

-- Original Jurisdiction

.

Victor Wilson, pro se , Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DENIED.

THOMAS, MAR STILLER, and BILBREY, JJ., CONCUR.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT
PETER LEYVA, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D18-2467 ) HIDDEN ACRES ESTATES, INC. BOARD ) OF DIRECTORS BRENDA WARREN; ) RICHARD GERHART; ROBERT ) LAWRENCE GREGORY BLANKINSHIP; ) JAMES ROWLAND; BARBARA ) GODFREY SAMUEL SCALES; and ) PATRICIA GERHART, ) ) Appellees. ) ) Opinion filed February 22, 2019. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Highlands County; Larry Helms, Judge. Peter Leyva, pro se. Henry B. Campbell and Elliott V. Mitchell of Campbell, Trohn, Tamayo & Aranda, P.A., Lakeland, for Appellees.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

SILBERMAN, SALARIO, and ATKINSON, JJ., Concur.
#### Bennie WILLIAMS v. STATE.

No. 18047.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 8, 1936.

Robert W. Dean, of Navasota, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is burglary; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The evidence heard upon the trial is not brought forward for review. A plea of guilty was entered by the appellant. No error in the conduct of the trial has been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.
Exhibit 10-b







AT&T INC.


 


HUMAN RESOURCES COMMITTEE


 


PROPOSED RESOLUTION, September 28, 2017


 







Whereas, AT&T Inc. ("AT&T Inc." or the "Company") has embarked on an operational reorganization that will allow it to compete more effectively across a broad range of communications and entertainment businesses; and


Whereas, it is critical to the Company that John Stankey, Senior Executive Vice President-AT&T/Time Warner Merger Integration Planning, AT&T Services, Inc., be retained through December 30, 2020;


Now, therefore, be it:


RESOLVED, that the provisions of the 2011 Incentive Plan, the 2016 Incentive Plan and of any successor plan relating to the automatic proration of performance shares upon Termination of Employment, as that term is defined in the 2016 Incentive Plan, shall not apply under the following circumstances:



	
1.

	
The proration shall not apply to the performance shares granted after the date of this resolution to Mr. Stankey if he remains employed through December 30, 2020;













	
2.

	
In addition, the existing and future performance shares granted to Mr. Stankey shall not be prorated:













		(a)	
if Mr. Stankey reports to an officer or employee of the Company or any of its affiliates other than the Chief Executive Officer of AT&T Inc.; or













		(b)	
if the Company creates a higher-level position (e.g., Vice Chairman or Chief Operating Officer of AT&T Inc.) and Mr. Stankey is not placed in that role or an equivalent role; and







RESOLVED FURTHER, that the proper officers of AT&T Inc. are authorized to do or cause to be done any and all such acts and things, and to execute and deliver any and all documents and papers that they may deem necessary, proper or advisable to carry out the foregoing resolutions.
#### PETERS v. STATE.

No. 14905.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Feb. 17, 1932.

E. B. Simmons, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J. .

Conspiracy to make a false instrument with intent to defraud is the offense, as denounced by title 19, chapter 1 (arts. 1622-1629), P. O. 1925; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The trial took place at a term of the district court of Webb county which adjourned on the 4th day of July, 1931. Notice of appeal was entered on the same day.

There are a number of bills of exception in the record which were filed in the trial court on the 3d day of October, 1931. On the same day, the statement of facts was filed with the clerk of the trial court.

The state’s attorney before this court objects to the consideration of the statement of facts and bills of exception upon the ground that the statute, article 760, subd. 5, C. C. P. 1925, precludes the consideration of bills of exception and statement of facts filed more than ninety days after notice of appeal is entered. The statute is specific in declaring that unless the statement of facts or bills of exception are filed within ninety days from the date of notice of appeal, they cannot be considered. Such is the practice followed in this court, unless the delay is shown to have resulted from some cause not within the control of the appellant and not due to lack of diligence upon his part. The subject is treat- . ed in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. C. C. P. vol. 3, p. 110, note 30. See also supplement to the volume mentioned, page 20, note 36, citing many cases, including Artho v. State, 108 Tex. Cr. R. 463, 1 S.W.(2d) 629; Brown v. State, 111 Tex. Cr. R. 612, 13 S.W.(2d) 372; Roberson v. State, 116 Tex. Cr. R. 273, 32 S.W.(2d) 478.

Without knowledge of the evidence heard, this court is not in* a position to review the complaints of the rulings of the trial court.

There being nothing in the record authorizing a reversal-of the judgment, we are compelled to order its affirmance.
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3184 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit the medical expenses 

of dependents who have not attained age 26 to be paid from a health 

savings account. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 23, 2015 

Mrs. LAWRENCE introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 

Committee on Ways and Means 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to permit 

the medical expenses of dependents who have not attained age 26 to be paid from a health savings account. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Youth Parity Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. MEDICAL EXPENSES OF DEPENDENTS WHO HAVE 

6 NOT ATTAINED AGE 26 PERMITTED TO BE 

7 PAID FROM HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNTS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Subparagraph (A) of section 

9 223(d)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (defining 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3184 IH

1 qualified medical expenses) is amended by inserting ‘‘and 

2 determined by substituting ‘age of 26’ for ‘age of 19’ in 

3 subsection (c)(3)(A)(i) thereof’’ before ‘‘) of such indi4 vidual’’. 

5 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

6 this section shall apply to amounts paid from health sav7 ings accounts after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
EPA Presentation on Changes to UST Regulations at TRIBAL SUMMIT 

TULSA, OK on March 29, 2012

EPA staff gave a short presentation on the proposed changes to the UST regulations and answered 

questions from the tribes.

Attendance

Heather Mann US EPA Region 6

Roger Hancock US EPA Region 6

Pinu’u Stout ENIPC/OETA

Genevieve McGeisey ENIPC/OETA

Mitchell Fipps Citizen Potawatomi Nation

Dino Chavarria Santa Clara Pueblo

Cheryl Stafford Ottawa Tribe

Tabitha King Ottawa Tribe

Robert Largent ITEC

David Hayes ITEC

Dwain Camp Tonkawa Tribe of OK

Phillip Pennington Chickasaw

Judy Ausmus Muscogee (Creek) Nation

Jerry Kelley Muscogee (Creek) Nation

Anthony Tiger Cherokee Nation

Kasey Johnson Cherokee Nation Entertainment

Dixie Shaw Pawnee Nation

Brian Stillwell Comanche Nation

Antonio Garza Kickapoo Traditional Tribe of Texas

Chuck Tillman Choctaw Nation
<PAGE>   1




MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT 23 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS








                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-48351) pertaining to the Maxco, Inc. Incentive Stock Option Plan and
in the related prospectus of our report dated May 20, 1997, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements and schedule of Maxco, Inc. included in the
Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended March 31, 1997.



                                                     /S/ERNST & YOUNG LLP


Detroit, Michigan
June 5, 1997
H. R. 3218 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday, 

the fourth day of January, two thousand and sixteen 

An Act 

Designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1221 State 

Street, Suite 12, Santa Barbara, California, as the ‘‘Special Warfare Operator 

Master Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis ‘Lou’ J. Langlais Post Office Building’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SPECIAL WARFARE OPERATOR MASTER CHIEF PETTY 

OFFICER (SEAL) LOUIS ‘‘LOU’’ J. LANGLAIS POST OFFICE 

BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 1221 State Street, Suite 12, Santa Barbara, 

California, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Special Warfare 

Operator Master Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) Louis ‘Lou’ J. Langlais 

Post Office Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘Special Warfare Operator Master Chief Petty Officer (SEAL) 

Louis ‘Lou’ J. Langlais Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
1845-0084 v4 – Affected Public – State, Local or Tribal Governments 11/7/2014

The regulations in 686.4 require an institution that ceases to participate or becomes ineligible to 

participate in the TEACH Grant program during an award year to report to the Department of 

Education within 45 days after the effective date of the loss of eligibility. The report must 

include the name of each TEACH Grant eligible student, the amount of the TEACH Grant funds 

paid to each student for that award year, and the amount of TEACH Grant funds due each 

eligible student through the end of the payment period. Also, the institution must provide an 

accounting of all TEACH Grant expenditures for that award year to the date of termination.

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Public institutions 2 2 17

The regulations in 686.11 establish that in addition to meeting the student eligibility

requirements, in order to receive a TEACH Grant the applicant must submit the designated 

application, sign a TEACH Grant agreement to serve (this burden is captured under OMB 

Control Number 1845-0083), and enroll in a TEACH Grant eligible institution. In addition, the 

grant recipient must either maintain a cumulative grade point average of 3.25 on a 4.0 scale 

during each payment period or score above the 75th percentile on at least one of the battery of 

nationally- normed standardized test.

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Public institutions 450 96,141 5,901

The regulations in 686.32 require an institution to provide initial, subsequent, and exit counseling 

to each TEACH Grant recipient and maintain documentation substantiating the counseling 

requirements. 

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Public institutions 450 450 6,329

The regulations in 686.34 require the institution to promptly provide written notification to a 

student requesting repayment of any overpayment that the institution does not have responsibility 

to repay. The regulations also require that the institution refer the student to the Department if 

the student does not take positive action to promptly resolve the TEACH Grant overpayment.

 # of # of Total

Respondents Responses hours

Public institutions 450 450 149

TOTALS

Responses 97,043

Respondents 450

Burden Hours 12,396
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

I,  Javier O. Lamoso, the President of ClearComm,L.P., certify that (i) the March 31, 2003 10-Q Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 and (ii) the information contained in the March 31, 2003 10-Q Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of ClearComm, L.P.

 

 
|   | /s/ Javier  O. Lamoso  |
|--------|------------------------|
|   | Javier O.  Lamoso      |
|   | President              |
|   | October 15,  2004 |

 

1

----
FILED U.S. COURT OF AP P EALS E LEVEN T HC IRC U IT AUGUST 13, 2007 THOMAS K. KAH

N CLERK [ DO NO T P UB L I S H] I N THE UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E E L E V E N T H C IR C U IT

________________________ N o. 07- 10445 N on -A rgum entC al endar

________________________ D . C. D o c k e tN o . 0 6 - 0 0 0 5 7 - CR- CG U N I T E D S T A T E S O F A M E R I C A , P la in tif f - A p p e lle e , v ersu s G A R Y S T E P H E N K R I S T , D e f e n d a n t- A p p e lla n t.

________________________ A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e So u th e rn D i s tr i c to f A l ab a ma

_________________________ ( A u gu s t 13, 2007) B efo re T JO F L A T , A N D E R S O N an d H U L L , C i rcu i tJu d g es. P E R C U R I A M: J a n J o n e s , ap p o in te d c o u n s e l f o rG a ry S te p h e n K r is t, h a s f ile d am o tio n to2

w i thd ra w on appeal supp ort ed by a bri ef prepare d p ursuantt o A nd er s v. C al i forni a, 386 U . S . 738, 87 S . C t . 1396, 18 L . E d. 2d 493 ( 1967) . O uri nde pe nde ntr e vi e w of the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s tha tc ouns e l ’ s a s s e s s m e ntof the r e l a t i ve m e r i tof

the appe a l i s c orr e c t . B e c a us e i nde pe nde nte xa m i na t i on of the e nt i r e r e c or d r e ve a l s no i ssu es o f arg u ab l e m eri t , co u n sel ’ s m o t i o n t o w i th d raw i s G R A N TED an d K rist’s conv i ct i on s a nd se nt ence s a re A FFI R M ED .
##### 



EXHIBIT 10.E.1
 
 Original Agreement
     Definitions
  Amendment to Section 8.5.
 Reports clause (ii)(B) Section 2.3 Section 2.4(a) Section 2.4(b)




---



##### 



Amendment to Section 8.7.
 Servicer Fees Servicer Fee Article II Article II
 Amendments to Exhibit I
  Cash Receipt Date
  Loss Horizon Ratio
  - 2 -




---



##### 



Mid-Month Report Exhibit XI Section 8.5
  Representations and Warranties.
 Section 5.1
  Effectiveness ab initio
 Amendments and Waivers
 Counterparts
 Continuing Effect; No Other Amendments
 CHOICE OF LAW
 - 3 -




---



##### 



[SIGNATURE PAGES FOLLOW]
 - 4 -




---



##### 



TGP FUNDING COMPANY, L.L.C.By TGP Finance Company, L.L.C., its ManagerBy:
    
    /s/ John J. HopperName: John J. HopperTitle: Vice PresidentTENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, as ServicerBy:
    
    /s/ John J. HopperName: John J. HopperTitle: Vice President
  By:
    
    /s/ Sean ReddingtonName: Sean ReddingtonTitle: Managing DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael GonikName: Michael GonikTitle: Director
  STARBIRD FUNDING CORPORATION,as a Conduit PurchaserBy:
    
    /s/ Franklin P. CollazoName: Franklin P. CollazoTitle: Secretary
 [Signature pages to Amendment No. 1 to
TGP Receivables Purchase Agreement]




---



##### 



BNP PARIBAS, acting through its New York Branch,as Committed InvestorBy:
    
    /s/ Sean ReddingtonName: Sean ReddingtonTitle: Managing DirectorBy:
    
    /s/ Michael GonikName: Michael GonikTitle: Director
 [Signature pages to Amendment No. 1 to
TGP Receivables Purchase Agreement]
From: Higgins, Cortney [mailto:Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 12:44 PM 

To: Culligan, Kevin; Stenhouse, Jeb; Conlin, Beth; Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE: RE discussion 

Still waiting for confirmation from folks – we may need to push this out. 

-----Original Appointment----- 

From: Culligan, Kevin [mailto:Culligan.Kevin@epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 12:20 PM 

To: Culligan, Kevin; Higgins, Cortney; Stenhouse, Jeb; Conlin, Beth; Wayland, Robertj 

Subject: RE discussion 

When: Friday, May 30, 2014 12:45 PM-1:15 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada). 

Where: 866-299-3188 Conf code 202.343.9781 

 

 

Invite others as appropriate
#### NORRIS v. STATE.

No. 14727.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Jan. 20, 1932.

Earle Kuntz, of Wichita Palis, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, J.

Conviction for selling intoxicating liquor; punishment, two years in the penitentiary.

The facts show without dispute that appellant sold whisky, on the occasion in question, to the two purchasers named in the indictment.

There are four bills of exception, in each of which complaint is made of argument of the state’s attorney. The language complained of in the first bill of exception is as follows: “If you object to this man selling poison whisky,—you give that man five years.” It appears from the bill that the court told the jury not to consider such remark. The act of the court in so instructing the jury is all that appears in the bill from which we might conclude that such language was used. There is nothing in the bill which shows the surroundings or setting of said argument, nor are any of the facts supporting or discrediting such statement, set out in the bill. We do not believe the statement of such injurious effect as should call for a reversal. There is. nothing in any of the three remaining -bills of exception — -in all of which it is stated that the court refused requested instructions that the argument be not considered — from which we obtain knowledge either that the remark objected to was made, or that if made it was not warranted by the facts before the jury. Reading the charge of the court without comment has never been held an error which would call for reversal.

It appears that the court heard evidence, upon the hearing of the motion for new trial, on the alleged misconduct of the jury in referring to the failure of the appellant to testify. The jurors who testified were in practical accord, stating, in effect, that one juror did express himself in regard to the appellant’s failure to testify. The jurors all agreed that this one reference was promptly suppressed and the matter was not discussed at all. The jurors were not in agreement as to what was said by the jur.or, and the action of the trial court in passing upon the weight of the testimony of said jurors appears to have abundant support, and we would not feel at liberty to hold that there is any evidence of an abuse of discretion on the part of the trial court in overruling the motion for new trial.

No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1 D 2 0 2 3

- 2363

_____________________________
P OINTE M EZZANINE , LLC and P OINTE R ESORT , LLC
, Appellant s ,

v.

G ENE L E ARLEY , J R

. , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County

. John T. Brown , Judge

.

January 24, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

. See Magnolia Fla. Tax Certificates v. Alexa1 , 229 So. 3d 1288 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017).

B.L. T HOMAS , R OWE , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 D. Kent Safriet, Edward M. Wenger and Gary K. Hunter, Jr., of Holtzman Vogel Baran Torchinsky & Josefiak, PLLC, Tallahassee
, for Appellant s

. Nathan D. Clark of Coral Reef Law Offices, P.A., Pensacola
, for Appellee.