alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Edward B. Kornfeld, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Porta Systems Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading  with respect to the period  covered by this  report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

      a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
      disclosure  controls and procedures to be designed under our  supervision,
      to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,  including
      its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those
      entities,  particularly  during the  period in which this  report is being
      prepared;

      b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions  about  the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,  as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
      control over  financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's
      fourth  fiscal  quarter that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably
      likely to  materially  affect,  the  registrant's  internal  control  over
      financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors:

      a) all significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
      operation  of  internal   control  over  financial   reporting  which  are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's  ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information; and

      b) any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
      over financial reporting.


                                                /s/Edward B. Kornfeld
                                                ---------------------------
Dated: March 26, 2004                           Edward B. Kornfeld
                                                Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the quarterly report of Wilhelmina International, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Murray, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




August 16, 2010

/s/ John P. MurrayName:
John P. MurrayTitle:
Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 21

PUBLIC SERVICE ENTERPRISE GROUP INCORPORATED

SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES

                                                                     State of
Name                                                Ownership %    Incorporation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Service Electric and Gas Company ..........      100          New Jersey
PSEG Power LLC ...................................      100          Delaware
PSEG Fossil LLC ..................................      100          Delaware
PSEG Energy Resources & Trade LLC ................      100          Delaware
PSEG Energy Holdings L.L.C. ......................      100          New Jersey
PSEG Resources L.L.C. ............................      100          New Jersey
PSEG Global L.L.C. ...............................      100          New Jersey
PSEG Global International Holdings LLC ...........      100          Delaware

      The remaining subsidiaries of Public Service Enterprise Group Incorporated
are not significant subsidiaries as defined in Regulation S-X.
EXHIBIT 11



STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS



The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the assumption that dilutive stock options are exercised.



|                                                                 |  |                        |        |  |      |   |        |      |  |   |        | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | ------ |  | ---- | - | ------ | ---- |  | - | ------ | 
|                                                                 |  | (IN THOUSANDS          |       
|                                                                 |  | EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA) |       
|                                                                 |  | 2008                   |        |  | 2007 |   |        | 2006 | 
|Net earnings (1)                                                 |  | $                      | 44,183 |  |      | $ | 38,623 |      |  | $ | 27,960 | 
|                                                                 |  |                        |        |  |      |   |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Weighted average common shares outstanding (2)                   |  |                        | 6,845  |  |      |   | 6,836  |      |  |   | 6,831  | 
|                                                                 |  |                        |        |  |      |   |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Common share equivalents relating to stock options               |  |                        |      |  |      |   |      |      |  |   |      | 
|                                                                 |  |                        |        |  |      |   |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for computation (3) |  |                        | 6,845  |  |      |   | 6,836  |      |  |   | 6,831  | 
|                                                                 |  |                        |        |  |      |   |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Net earnings per share:                                          |  |                        |        |  |      |   |        |      |  |   |        | 
|Basic (1 / 2)                                                    |  | $                      | 6.45   |  |      | $ | 5.65   |      |  | $ | 4.09   | 
|Diluted (1 / 3)                                                  |  | $                      | 6.45   |  |      | $ | 5.65   |      |  | $ | 4.09   |
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 2957 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 2957

    To reauthorize the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              July 7, 2015

 Mr. Kind (for himself and Mr. Wittman) introduced the following bill; 
        which was referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To reauthorize the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION 
              ACT.

    The Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act is amended--
            (1) in section 9(c)(2) (16 U.S.C. 6108(c)(2)), by striking 
        ``3'' and inserting ``4''; and
            (2) in section 10 (16 U.S.C. 6109)--
                    (A) by striking subsections (a) and (b) and 
                inserting the following:
    ``(a) Authorization of Appropriations.--There is authorized to be 
appropriated to the Fund to carry out this Act $6,500,000 for each of 
fiscal years 2016 through 2020, to remain available until expended, of 
which not less than 75 percent of the amounts made available for each 
fiscal year shall be expended for projects carried out outside the 
United States.''; and
                    (B) by redesignating subsections (c) and (d) as 
                subsections (b) and (c), respectively.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.2

                                     FORM OF
                      LETTER AGREEMENT AMENDING EMPLOYMENT
                                   AGREEMENT

      Corixa Corporation ("Corixa") and _____________ ("Executive"), hereby
amend the Employment Agreement between Corixa and Executive, dated ______, (the
"Agreement") as follows:

      1)    The number of option shares for which Executive is eligible under
            Paragraph 3(b)(i) of the Agreement is hereby increased from ____ to
            ____.

      2)    The annual discretionary cash bonus for which Executive is eligible
            under Paragraph 3(c) of the Agreement is hereby increased from __%
            of Executive's then current base salary to __% of Executive's then
            current base salary.

      Dated: ______________.

      ____________________________                     _________________________
      Corixa Corporation                               Executive
      By:  _______________________
      Its: _______________________
# C_2023186EN.01000901.xml

| 26.5.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 186/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 186/9

---

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Cases where the Commission raises no objections

SA.102103

(2023/C 186/08)

| Date of adoption of the decision | 30.3.2023 |
| --- | --- |
| Aid number | SA.102103 |
| Member State | Lithuania |
| Region | Lithuania |
| Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary) | Investicijos ‘ŠESD absorbavimo pajėgumų didinimas’ įgyvendinimas atkuriant šlapžemes žemės ūkio paskirties žemėje (toliau — Investicija) |
| Legal basis | 2021–2030 metų Plėtros programos valdytojos Lietuvos Respublikos žemės ūkio ministerijos žemės ir maisto ūkio, kaimo plėtros bei žuvininkystės plėtros programos pažangos priemonės Nr. 15-001-06-02-02 ‘Didinti ŠESD absorbcinius pajėgumus (atkuriant pelkių (durpžemių) hidrologinį režimą)’ projektų finansavimo aprašo projektas. |
| Type of measure | Scheme |
| Objective | Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Environmental protection, Aid for agri-environment-climate commitments |
| Form of aid | Direct grant |
| Budget | Overall budget: 16 000 000 EUR |
| Intensity | 100,0  % |
| Duration | Until 30.6.2026 |
| Economic sectors | Growing of perennial crops, Animal production, Mixed farming |
| Name and address of the granting authority | Lietuvos Respublikos žemės ūkio ministerija |
| Gedimino av. 19, Vilnius |

Date of adoption of the decision

30.3.2023

Aid number

SA.102103

Member State

Lithuania

Region

Lithuania

Title (title and/or name of the beneficiary)

Investicijos ‘ŠESD absorbavimo pajėgumų didinimas’ įgyvendinimas atkuriant šlapžemes žemės ūkio paskirties žemėje (toliau — Investicija)

Legal basis

2021–2030 metų Plėtros programos valdytojos Lietuvos Respublikos žemės ūkio ministerijos žemės ir maisto ūkio, kaimo plėtros bei žuvininkystės plėtros programos pažangos priemonės Nr. 15-001-06-02-02 ‘Didinti ŠESD absorbcinius pajėgumus (atkuriant pelkių (durpžemių) hidrologinį režimą)’ projektų finansavimo aprašo projektas.

Type of measure

Scheme

Objective

Agriculture; Forestry; Rural areas, Environmental protection, Aid for agri-environment-climate commitments

Form of aid

Direct grant

Budget

Overall budget: 16 000 000 EUR

Intensity

100,0  %

Duration

Until 30.6.2026

Economic sectors

Growing of perennial crops, Animal production, Mixed farming

Name and address of the granting authority

Lietuvos Respublikos žemės ūkio ministerija

Gedimino av. 19, Vilnius

Other information

The authentic text(s) of the decision, from which all confidential information has been removed, can be found at:

https://ec.europa.eu/competition/elojade/isef/index.cfm

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40960

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FELIX ARTEMIO ALAFFA-FLORES,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. M-98-CR-184-1

- - - - - - - - - -

April 16, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and DUHÉ, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM:*

Felix Artemio Alaffa-Flores (“Alaffa”) appeals the sentence

following his guilty-plea conviction for possessing with intent

to distribute more than 100 kilograms of marijuana. Alaffa

argues that the district court erred in finding that he did not

play a minimal or minor role in the criminal activity such that

he would be entitled to a mitigating role adjustment. See

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2(a),(b). He also argues, for the first time on

appeal, that the district court erred by relying upon an 
No. 98-40960

-2-

erroneous factor, his past criminal conduct, in denying his

request for a mitigating role adjustment. U.S.S.G. Ch. 3, Pt. B,

intro. comment; U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3. 

We have carefully reviewed the arguments and the appellate

record. Alaffa has failed to demonstrate that the district court

erred in its finding that he did not play a minimal or minor role

in the criminal activity. See United States v. Rojas, 868 F.2d

1409, 1410 (5th Cir. 1989); United States v. Gallegos, 868 F.2d

711, 713 (5th Cir. 1989). Moreover, Alaffa has failed to

demonstrate plain error because the district court’s erroneous

reliance on Alaffa’s past criminal conduct in denying his request

for a mitigating role adjustment was harmless. See United States

v. Kay, 83 F.3d 98, 101 (5th Cir. 1996); United States v.

Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-64 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc).

AFFIRMED.
#### LUNA v. STATE.

No. 21051.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

April 10, 1940.

Jake J. Reich, of San Antonio, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The conviction is for the offense of contributing to the delinquency of a child; Penalty assessed at confinement in the county jail for ninety days.

The complaint and information are sufficient to charge the offense. The record is before us without a statement of facts *1075or bills of exception. All procedural matters appear to be in due order.

The judgment is affirmed.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined' by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Exhibit 35.2

Feb 28, 2014

Servicer Compliance Statement

For SEMT 2012-3 (see Schedule A)



| | (i) | a review of the Servicers activities during the reporting period from January 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 and of its performance under the Agreement (each of the agreement and the reconstitution
Agreement as defined on Schedule A attached hereto) from the above referenced trust during such period has been made under such officers supervision, and
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (ii) | to the best of such officers knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under this Agreement and any applicable Reconstitution Agreement in all material respects throughout
such reporting period (or applicable portion thereof) or, if there has been a failure to fulfill any such obligation in any material respect, specifically identifying each such failure known to such officer and the nature and the status thereof.
| | ---- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



First Republic BankBy:

/s/ Lionel AntunesName: Lionel AntunesTitle: Vice President of Residential LendingDate: Feb. 28, 2014




---

<for SEMT 2012-3>

SCHEDULE A



| | 1. | Flow Mortgage Loan Sale and Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2010, between Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation and First Republic Bank, as modified by Reconstitution Agreement dated June 27,
2012.
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3233 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3233

To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to protect unpaid 
    interns in the legislative branch from workplace harassment and 
                discrimination, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2015

    Mr. Cummings (for himself, Mr. Scott of Virginia, and Ms. Meng) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                          House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 to protect unpaid 
    interns in the legislative branch from workplace harassment and 
                discrimination, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Congressional Intern Protection Act 
of 2015''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION TO UNPAID INTERNS OF RIGHTS AND PROTECTIONS AGAINST 
              EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION UNDER CONGRESSIONAL 
              ACCOUNTABILITY ACT OF 1995.

    Section 201 of the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995 (2 
U.S.C. 1311) is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following new 
        subsection:
    ``(d) Application to Unpaid Interns.--
            ``(1) In general.--Subsections (a) and (b) shall apply with 
        respect to an intern, including an applicant for an internship 
        and a former intern, in the same manner and to the same extent 
        as such subsections apply with respect to an employee.
            ``(2) Intern defined.--The term `intern' means an 
        individual who performs uncompensated voluntary service for an 
        employing office to earn credit awarded by an educational 
        institution or to learn a trade or occupation.''.
                                 <all>
```
#### HENDERSON v. STATE.

No. 20398.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1939.

Jimmie Cunningham, of Graham, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of theft of property under the value of $50 and over $5. Her punishment was assessed at confinement in the county jail for a period of 60 days and a fine of $100.

It appears from the transcript that the complaint and information was filed in the County Court of Young County on December 5, 1938, charging her with theft of property of the value of $25.50. She was arrested by the sheriff on said day at four p. m. and placed in jail. On the following morning, she was brought before the court and required to plead to said charge. The judgment recites that she waived a jury and entered a plea of guilty —which resulted in her conviction and punishment as above stated.

After her conviction, appellant secured the services of an attorney, who in due time filed a motion for a new trial, stating in said *motion*that appellant was *903not guilty, but was induced to enter a plea of guilty under threats and duress on the part of the sheriff. The order overruling the motion shows that the court, in the absence of appellant, heard, considered and overruled the same. The order recites that the court heqrd evidence on the matters therein stated.

Art. 580, C.C.P. reads as follows: “In all prosecutions for felonies, the defendant must be personally present at the trial, and he must likewise be present in all cases of misdemeanor when the punishment or any part thereof is imprisonment in jail. * * *”

Under this Article, it was error for the court, in the absence of appellant, to hear, consider and overrule the motion. See Sweat v. State, 4 Tex.App. 617; 12 Tex. Juris., Sec. 214, p. 520, and Sec. 217, p. 526.

It might not be amiss to state here that an accused should be accorded a reasonable time to engage and confer with counsel before being required to plead.

For the errors hereinabove discussed, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.