alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported)
April 4, 2007
 HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
  Delaware
    
    001-13790
    
    76-0336636(State or other jurisdiction
    
    (Commission File
    
    (IRS Employerof incorporation)
    
    Number)
    
    Identification No.)
 13403 Northwest Freeway 
Houston, Texas
    
    77040-6094(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    (Zip Code)
 Registrants telephone number, including area code:
    
    (713) 690-7300
  o
 o
 o
 o




---



TABLE OF CONTENTS  Item 1.01. Entry Into a Material Definitive AgreementItem 1.02. Termination of a Material Definitive AgreementItem 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a RegistrantItem 9.01 Financial Statements and ExhibitsSIGNATURESEXHIBITS INDEXLoan Agreement    Table of Contents  
 Item 1.01. Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement.
   1 2
     
 Item 1.02. Termination of a Material Definitive Agreement.
  
 Item 2.03. Creation of a Direct Financial Obligation or an Obligation Under an Off-Balance Sheet Arrangement of a Registrant.




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits
 No.
    
    Exhibit10.1
    
    Loan Agreement ($300,000,000 Revolving Loan Facility) dated as of
April 4, 2007 with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Citibank,
N.A., Wachovia Bank, National Association, Amegy Bank, National
Association, Royal Bank of Scotland, and Bank of New York




---



##### Table of Contents



HCC INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.Date: April 17, 2007By:
    
    /s/ Frank J. Bramanti

Frank J. Bramanti,Chief Executive Officer




---



##### Table of Contents



EXHIBITS INDEX
 No.
    
    Exhibit10.1
    
    Loan Agreement ($300,000,000 Revolving Loan Facility) dated as of
April 4, 2007 with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Citibank,
N.A., Wachovia Bank, National Association, Amegy Bank, National
Association, Royal Bank of Scotland, and Bank of New York
Letter Agreement between Larry E. Reimert and Dril-Quip, Inc.


 Exhibit 10.1 
  
 October 28, 2004 
  
 Dril-Quip, Inc. 
 13550 Hempstead Hwy. 
 Houston, Texas 77040 
  
 Gentlemen: 
  
 In light of the
current uncertainty surrounding stock option expensing, I hereby waive my right to receive an award of stock options in 2004 pursuant to Section 3.C of the Employment Agreement (the “Employment Agreement”) dated as of October 17, 1997
between myself and Dril-Quip, Inc. (the “Company”). Additionally, I hereby waive any right to terminate the Employment Agreement for Good Reason (as defined in the Employment Agreement) specifically caused by the Company’s failure to
award such stock options in the year 2004 only. No other conditions or rights of the contract are waived and the right to receive an award of stock options is only waived for the year 2004. 
  

	
	 Very truly yours,

	
	 /s/ Larry E. Reimert




  
 Accepted and Agreed as of the

 date first written above. 
  

			
	 DRIL-QUIP, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Gary D. Smith


	 Name:
	 	 Gary D. Smith

	 Title:
	 	 Co-CEO
|November 30, 2007Via EmailThe Saskatchewan Syndicate455702 B.C. Ltd.1910-925 West Georgia StreetVancouver, British ColumbiaCanada V6C 3LSAttention: Matthew Mason
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timothy Young1640  1066 West Hastings Street 
Vancouver, British Columbia Canada V6E 3X1

Dear Sirs,

Re: Tecton Corporation (the Company)

Reference is made to the Wapata Lake Uranium Property Option Agreement dated January 22, 2007 between The Saskatchewan Syndicate,an unincorporated joint venture comprising 455702 B.C. LTD. and Timothy Young (collectively the Syndicate), and Tecton Corporation (the Company) as amended by addendum agreements between the parties dated January 31, 2007 and September 10, 2007 (collectively the Agreement).

This letter will confirm our understanding that, although the Company did not pay $300,000 in cash to the Syndicate on or before the Option Expiry Date (as defined in the Agreement) in accordance with Section 1.01 (c) of the Agreement, the Syndicate expressly waives its rights and remedies pursuant to Section 1.06 of the Agreement in relation to such failure to pay. The Syndicate hereby acknowledges receipt of $300,000 CDN (455702 B.C. Ltd as to $150,000 CDN and Timothy Young as to $150,000 CDN) paid by the Company in full satisfaction of Section 1.01 (c) of the Agreement and in full exercise of the option pursuant to the Agreement.

Accordingly, the Syndicate shall deliver a bill of sale in respect of the Wapata Lake Property (as defined in the Agreement) to the Company, in a form approved by the Company, within five business days following the execution of this letter of agreement. Further, the Syndicate shall deliver such further documents as may be requested from time to time by the Company to effect the transfer of title to the Company and to carry out the full intent of the Agreement.

---



| 2 
|-----

Kindly acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing by signing below and returning a copy of this letter to the sender.



|Yours truly,TECTONCORPORATIONPer: /s/ Bruno WeissBruno WeissDirector and Chief Financial Officer
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|455702 B.C. LTD.
|----------------



|Per: /s/ Mathew MasonMathew Mason, PresidentDate: November 30, 2007
|-------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ Timothy YoungTimothy YoungDate: November 30, 2007
|-----------------------------------------------------

---
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 9, 2021 No. 04-21-00490-CR IN RE Santiago GONZALEZ From the County Court at Law No. 12, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 512239 Yolanda T. Huff, Judge Presiding Original Mandamus Proceeding 1 

### O R D E R Sitting: Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice

Irene Rios, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice On November 5, 2021, relator filed a petition for writ of mandamus, complaining that the trial court has failed to rule on his article 11.072 writ of habeas corpus application. T EX . C ODE C RIM . P RO . A NN . art. 11.072 § 6(a). This court is of the tentative opinion that a serious question concerning the relief sought requires further consideration. See T EX . R. A PP . P. 52.8(b). The respondent and the real party in interest may file a response to the petition in this court no later than November 29, 2021. It is so ORDERED on November 9, 2021. PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:__________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, CLERK OF COURT

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 512239, styled Ex parte Gonzalez , pending in the County Court at Law No. 12, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Yolanda T. Huff presiding.
# Official Journal C 2/2014

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.002.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 2 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 577 January 2014 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2014.002.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 2

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 577 January 2014

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | II   Information |
| | INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 002/01 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 1 |
| 2014/C 002/02 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 4 |
| 2014/C 002/03 | Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1) | 5 |

Notice No

Contents

page

II   Information

INFORMATION FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 002/01

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

1

2014/C 002/02

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

4

2014/C 002/03

Authorisation for State aid pursuant to Articles 107 and 108 of the TFEU — Cases where the Commission raises no objections (1)

5

---

| | IV   Notices |
| --- | --- |
| | NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES |
| | European Commission |
| 2014/C 002/04 | Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,25 % on 1 January 2014 — Euro exchange rates | 6 |
| 2014/C 002/05 | Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2014(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1)) | 7 |

IV   Notices

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

European Commission

2014/C 002/04

Interest rate applied by the European Central Bank to its main refinancing operations: 0,25 % on 1 January 2014 — Euro exchange rates

6

2014/C 002/05

Commission notice on current State aid recovery interest rates and reference/discount rates for 28 Member States applicable as from 1 January 2014(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

(Published in accordance with Article 10 of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 (OJ L 140, 30.4.2004, p. 1))

7

---

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

1

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JUAN ANTONIO FALCON, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

M. R. PHILLIPS, Correctional Lieutenant at 

KVSP, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

No. 16-16177 

D.C. No. 1:10-cv-02262-EPG 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Erica P. Grosjean, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted April 11, 2017***

Before: GOULD, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges. 

California state prisoner Juan Antonio Falcon appeals pro se from the district 

court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging a due process 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** Falcon consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 U.S.C. 

§ 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

APR 21 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-16177 

claim arising from a disciplinary hearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 

§ 1291. We review de novo. Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443, 447 (9th Cir. 2000) 

(dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A); Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 

(9th Cir. 1998) (order) (dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Falcon’s action because Falcon failed 

to allege facts implicating a liberty or property interest protected by the Due 

Process Clause. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 484 (1995) (protected liberty 

or property interest arises under due process clause when a restraint imposes an 

“atypical and significant hardship on the inmate in relation to the ordinary 

incidents of prison life”); see also Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) 

(plaintiff must allege facts that “allow[ ] the court to draw the reasonable inference 

that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged”).

We do not consider arguments and allegations raised for the first time on 

appeal. See Padgett v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

We reject as meritless Falcon’s contention that the district court improperly 

restricted his ability to plead his claim.

AFFIRMED.
#### JEANES v. STATE.

No. 14471.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

Nov. 4, 1931.

Wallace Hughston, of McKinney, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s-Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MOEEOW, P. J.

Negligent homicide in the second degree is the offense; penalty, assessed at confinement in the county jail for two years.

No statement of facts accompanies the record ; nor have we been favored with a brief.

In the motion for new trial, there is- an effort to set out the evidence, but in that form and unverified by the trial judge it cannot be given consideration.

There is an absence of bills of exception.

There is a suggestion of a prior conviction, but the record is void of a plea of former conviction. See articles 508 and 509, C. C. P. 1925. In order to authorize the consideration of the complaint that the appellant had been previously convicted of the same offense, pleading in the trial court is essential. See Lee v. State, 66 Tex. Cr. R. 567, 148 S. W. 567, 40 L. E. A. (N. S.) 1132; articles 508 and 509, supra; also Branch’s Ann. Tex. P. C. § 630. In article 508, supra, the plea of former conviction is classified as a special plea; and under article 509 it is said: “Every special plea shall be verified by the affidavit of the defendant.”

Article 510, O. O. P., provides that all issues of fact presented by a special plea shall be tried by a jury. Many cases uphold the general principle that the issue of former conviction must be presented by written and verified plea. See annotations in Vernon’s Ann. Tex. O. O. P. 1925, vol. 1, pp. 398-401.

The judgment is affirmed.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350 (as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), I, the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of National Presto Industries, Inc. (the Company), hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the SEC or its Staff upon request.





Date:   March 17, 2008
        /S/ M.J. CohenM. J. Cohen
Interim Chief Financial Officer








---
##### Table of Contents



SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): March 22, 2007
 COPANO ENERGY, L.L.C.
  Delaware
    
    001-32329
    
    51-0411678(State or Other Jurisdiction of
    
    (Commission
    
    (I.R.S. EmployerIncorporation or Organization)
    
    File Number)
    
    Identification No.)2727 Allen Parkway, Suite 1200Houston, Texas
    
    
    
    77019(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
    
    
    
    (Zip Code)
 (713) 621-9547
 Not Applicable.
   o
    
    Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)o
    
    Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))o
    
    Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))




---



##### Table of Contents



TABLE OF CONTENTS
  
 Item 7.01Regulation FD Disclosure.Item 9.01.Financial Statements and Exhibits.Press ReleasePresentation MaterialsPress ReleasePresentation Materials




---



##### Table of Contents



Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure.
 Company
 
 Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.
      Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Copano Energy, L.L.C. press release dated March 22, 200799.2
    
    Copano Energy, L.L.C. presentation materials  Lehman Brothers 2007 High Yield Bond and Syndicated Loan Conference
 2




---



##### Table of Contents



SIGNATURES
  COPANO ENERGY, L.L.C.Date: March 26, 2007
    By:
    /s/ MATTHEW J. ASSIFFName:
    Matthew J. AssiffTitle:
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer 3




---



##### Table of Contents



Exhibit Index
 Exhibit No.
    
    Description99.1
    
    Copano Energy, L.L.C. press release dated March 22, 200799.2
    
    Copano Energy, L.L.C. presentation materials  Lehman Brothers 2007 High Yield Bond and Syndicated Loan Conference
SCPW-21-0000458
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

LAEL SAMONTE, Petitioner,

vs. STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent.

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS ( B y : R e c k t e n w a l d , C . J . , N a k a y a m a , M c K e n n a , a n d W i l s o n , J J . , a n d C i r c u i t J u d g e T o # o t o # o , a s s i g n e d i n p l a c e o f E d d i n s , J . , r e c u s e d )

Upon consideration of the document submitted by petitioner Lael Samonte entitled, “Defense Counsels Motion for Judgment of Acquittal,” which was filed as a petition for writ of mandamus on August 9, 2021, petitioner fails to demonstrate that he is entitled to the requested extraordinary relief from this court. See Kema v. Gaddis, 91 Hawai # i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of mandamus is an extraordinary remedy that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested action). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for writ of mandamus is denied.

IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk of the Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCPW-21-0000458 03-SEP-2021 09:35 AM Dkt. 12 ODDPappellate court shall process the petition for writ of mandamus

without payment of the filing fees.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, September 3, 2021. /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Fa # auuga To # oto # o
**EXHIBIT 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Exhibit








Exhibit 10.2
AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


    
This AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT is entered into this 14th day of August, 2017, between CNO Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”) and Edward J. Bonach (“Executive”).


Recitals


A.The Company and Executive entered into an Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of December 18, 2014 and an Amendment thereto dated as of May 16, 2017 (collectively, the “Agreement”).


B.The Company and Executive desire to further amend the Agreement as set forth herein. 
    
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants contained herein, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged:




		
	1.
	The first two sentences of Section 10(c) of the Agreement are hereby amended in their entirety to read as follows:




Executive’s employment may be terminated in a Control Termination.  A “Control Termination” shall mean any termination by the Company (or its successor), of Executive’s employment for any reason, or by Executive With Reason as so defined, within six months in anticipation of or within two years following a Change in Control.  


All other provisions of Section 10(c) of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.


		
	2.
	The first sentence of Section 11(d) of the Agreement is hereby amended in its entirety to read as follows:  




In the event that Executive is terminated by the Company (or its successor) in a Control Termination as so defined, or if Executive terminates his employment With Reason in a Control Termination, then the Company shall pay Executive within 30 days of the Termination Date the Accrued Amounts.  


All other provisions of Section 11(d) of the Agreement shall remain unchanged.













All provisions of the Agreement not amended hereby shall remain in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to Employment Agreement as of the date first above written.


CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.


	
		
	By:
	/s/ Susan L. Menzel

	 
	Susan L. Menzel, Executive Vice

	 
	President, Human Resources






	
		
	 
	/s/ Edward J. Bonach

	 
	Edward J. Bonach

	 
	 








2
# Official Journal L 115/2020

| | ISSN 1977-0677 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | L 115 |
| | |
| English edition | Legislation | Volume 6314 April 2020 |

ISSN 1977-0677

Official Journal

of the European Union

L 115

English edition

Legislation

Volume 6314 April 2020

---

| Contents | | II   Non-legislative acts | page |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| | | DECISIONS |
| | * | Commission Decision (EU) 2020/519 of 3 April 2020 on the sectoral reference document on best environmental management practices, sector environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence for the waste management sector under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (
  1
  ) | 1 |

Contents

II   Non-legislative acts

page

DECISIONS

*

Commission Decision (EU) 2020/519 of 3 April 2020 on the sectoral reference document on best environmental management practices, sector environmental performance indicators and benchmarks of excellence for the waste management sector under Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community eco-management and audit scheme (EMAS) (
  1
  )

1

1

| | |
| --- | --- |
| | (1)   Text with EEA relevance |

---

(1)   Text with EEA relevance

| EN | Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.
  The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk. |
| --- | --- |

EN

Acts whose titles are printed in light type are those relating to day-to-day management of agricultural matters, and are generally valid for a limited period.

The titles of all other Acts are printed in bold type and preceded by an asterisk.
***Exhibit 21.1*****LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF ULTRA PETROLEUM CORP.**     **Jurisdiction of****Entity** **Organization**   Keystone Gas Gathering, LLC Delaware   Sino-American Energy Corporation Nevada   Ultra Resources, Inc. Wyoming   UP Energy Corporation Nevada
POLAR4 

December 8, 2014 

Mr. Brett Kruger 

Chief, U.S. Carrier Licensing Division 

Office of International Aviation 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 20590 

Dear Mr. Kruger: 

Re: Application of Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. for 

U.S.-Mexico Exemption Authoritv (Docket OST-2014-0215) 

Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. ("Polar") has polled the carriers copied below and no party has objected 

to the above-referenced application. If all is in order, Polar respectfully requests that it be granted an 

exemption authorizing it to provide scheduled foreign air transportation of property and mail between 

the United States and Mexico, as well as permission to conduct code share services in the ChicagoMexico City and Cincinnati-Mexico City routes. 

I 

.' 

Sincerely yours, 

;r?'f 

l<evm P. Montgomery 

cc: Bob Wirick 

Russ Pommer 

Sascha Vander Bellen 

Dan Weiss 

Nancy Sparks 

Mark Atwood 

Dontai Smalls 

801 17TH STREET, NW, SUITE 410 • WASHINGTON , DC 20006 • TEL: 202.828.1002