alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 OR 15(d) of
The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  Encysive Pharmaceuticals Inc.
 
  Delaware
    
    0-20117
    
    13-3532643(State or other jurisdiction 
of incorporation)
    
    (Commission
File Number)
    
    (IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 4848 Loop Central Drive, Suite 700, Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
    
    77081
(Zip Code)
 713-796-8822
  
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



Item 8.01      Other Events.
     This current report on Form 8-K contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, including statements with respect to prospects for regulatory approval of TBC3711
and other statements regarding matters that are not historical facts. You may identify some of
these forward-looking statements by the use of words in the statements such as anticipate,
estimate, expect, project, intend, potential, plan, believe or other words and terms
of similar meaning. Among the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from
those indicated by such forward- looking statements are: difficulties in obtaining sufficient
patient population and clinician support for TBC3711 clinical trials; delays in the timelines for
recruiting clinical sites and enrolling patients in TBC3711 clinical trials; unforeseen or
significant side effects or other safety issues with respect to TBC3711; any estimates concerning
the amount of time necessary to determine whether TBC3711 is effective; production of sufficient
quantities of TBC3711 to complete clinical trials; any estimates of the size of the resistant
hypertension patient population.; the results of clinical trials with respect to TBC3711; the
availability of sufficient funds to continue research and clinical development efforts for TBC3711;
as well as more specific risks and uncertainties facing Encysive such as those set forth in its
reports on Form 8-K, 10-Q and 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Given
these risks and uncertainties, any or all of these forward-looking statements may prove to be
incorrect. Therefore, you should not rely on any such factors or forward- looking statements.
Furthermore, Encysive does not intend to update publicly any forward-looking statement, except as
required by law. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 permits this discussion.
 [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS]




---



##### 



SIGNATURES
  ENCYSIVE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
(Registrant)Date: March 21, 2007
    /s/ Paul S. ManierrePaul S. ManierreVice President and General Counsel
#### CHOATE et al. v. RENFRO.

No. 3405.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Beaumont.

March 16, 1939.

J. E. Whitmore and Ira Butler, both of Fort Worth, for appellants.

E. B. Lewis, of Center, for appellee.

COMBS, Justice.

Appellee, A. R. Renfro as plaintiff sued appellants, K. B. Choate, constable, and his bondsmen, and Tom Rogers, Shelby County Supervisor for the Live Stock Sanitary Commission, for damages 'for the alleged conversion of a mare valued at $50. He sought additional damages in the sum of $240, value of cotton which he would have made had his farm not been reduced from a “two-horse farm” to a “one-horse farm” by the conversion of his mare. He also sought exemplary damages in the sum of $500. The defendants, in addition to their general answer, plead specifically that Shelby County was under stock quarantine against fever tick infection, requiring live stock to be dipped; the mare in question was taken up on the open range by Constable Choate and dipped in accordance with the law; that certain legal charges accrued against the mare which plaintiff refused to pay and she was .posted for sale and sold at public auction by Constable Choate in satisfaction of the legal charges. The trial judge struck out the specific answer on exceptions of plaintiff and upon the trial, which was to a jury, excluded all evidence offered by defendants to show that the horse was taken up and sold according to law. Four issues were submitted to the jury, three being answered in favor of defendants and in response to the fourth the jury fixed the value of the horse at $50. No issue of conversion was submitted. However, the trial judge entered a judgment *719for the plaintiff and against the defendants for $50 and costs, and the defendants have appealed.

Opinion.

 The rulings of the trial court were clearly erroneous. If possession and sale of the horse was in accordance with law neither Constable Choate nor the other defendants could be liable in damages for converting it. Parker v. Miller, Tex. Civ. App., 118 S.W.2d 380.

In view of a contention made by appellee, we will add that under the facts plead, the taking of the horse by Constable Choate would not be rendered wrongful by failure to obtain a search warrant as provided in Art. 1525C, § 10 of Vernon’s Annotated Penal Code. The horse was taken up on- the open range and there was no occasion to obtain a search warrant.

On the verdict of the jury the defendants were entitled to judgment. No issue of wrongful conversion was submitted to the jury or requested. And even if the evidence raised the issue, and we think it did not, still it was not such issue as the court was authorized to find in support of the judgment. Pioneer Bldg. & Loan Ass’n v. Compton, Tex. Civ.App., 105 S.W.2d 354, 355, and authorities cited. The trial court should have entered judgment for the defendants on the verdict.

We think it sufficiently appears from the record that appellee in fact has no cause of action. It is accordingly ordered that the judgment of the trial court be reversed and judgment here rendered for appellants.

Reversed and rendered.
**Exhibit 24.2****POWER OF ATTORNEY**     KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that the individual whose signature appears below herebyconstitutes and appoints James J. Mermis and R. Joshua Koch, Jr., and each of them, his or her trueand lawful attorney-in-fact and agents, with full and several power of substitution andresubstitution, for him or her in his or her name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, tosign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to the Registration Statement onForm S-1 (Registration No. 333-136567) of Superior Offshore International, Inc., a Delawarecorporation, any registration statement for the same offering filed pursuant to Rule 462(b) underthe Securities Act and any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) thereto, and tofile the same, with all exhibits thereto, and all other documents in connection therewith, with theSecurities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each ofthem full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite andnecessary to be done as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, herebyratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents or any of them, or theirsubstitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.     INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has hereto signed this Power ofAttorney this 10 day ofJanuary, 2007.                                                                     /s/ Roger D. Burks   Roger D. Burks
##### 



EXHIBIT 23 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors of
J. C. Penney Funding Corporation: We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8
(Registration Nos. 33-28390, 33-66070, 33-66072, 333-33343, 333-27329, 333-45536,
333-62066) and on Form S-3 (Registration Nos. 333-57019 and 333-103147-01) of J. C.
Penney Company, Inc. of our report dated March 25, 2005, with respect to the balance
sheets of J. C. Penney Funding Corporation as of January 29, 2005 and January 31, 2004,
and the related statements of income, reinvested earnings, and cash flows for each of the
years in the three-year period ended January 29, 2005, which report appears in the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of J. C. Penney Funding Corporation. /s/ KPMG LLP Dallas, Texas
April 7, 2005
| (1)   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2)   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |
|-----------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|            |   |                                                                |
|-----------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------|
|            |   |                                                                |   |
| August 14, 2009 | By:    | /s/  Steven Y. Moskowitz                        |   |
|            |   | Steven Y. Moskowitz                                                 |   |
|            |   | President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) |   |
|            |   |                                                                |   |
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 13**  **- 6818** 

BARTO USRY , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Defendant

– Appellee , and DOUGLASS WILLIS, Unit Manager , Party

- in

- Interest
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Wheeling
. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. ( 5:11

- cv - 00141

- FPS

- JES )

Submitted : October 28, 2013 Decided: November 6, 2013

Before AGEE, DAVIS, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Barto Usry, Appellant Pro Se. Alan McGonigal, Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Barto Usry appeals the district court’s order rejecting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his action under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. On appeal, Usry challen ges the district court’s conclusion that his FTCA claim is barred by the discretionary function exception. See 2 8 U.S.C. § 2680(a) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the dis trict court. Usry v. United States , No. 5:11

- cv - 00141

- FPS

JES (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the d ecisional process.
AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of THE POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY (the Company), hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|               |  |  |  |                                              
|-------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|               |  | 
|               |  |  |  | /s/    Jeffrey D. Serkes                     
|March 10, 2005 |  |  |  | Jeffrey D. Serkes Principal Financial Officer
| **Income Taxes (Details) - USD ($) $ in Millions** | Jun. 30, 2022 | Dec. 31, 2021 |
|----------------------------------------------------|---------------|---------------|
| **Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]**               |          |          |
| Unrecognized Tax Benefits                          | $ 0           | $ 0           |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_IncomeTaxDisclosureAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Amount of unrecognized tax benefits.
+ References
Reference 1: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 740 -SubTopic 10 -Section 45 -Paragraph 10B -URI https://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=123427490&loc=SL37586934-109318Reference 2: http://www.xbrl.org/2003/role/disclosureRef -Publisher FASB -Name Accounting Standards Codification -Topic 740 -SubTopic 10 -Section 50 -Paragraph 15A -Subparagraph (a) -URI https://asc.fasb.org/extlink&oid=121826272&loc=SL6600010-109319
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_UnrecognizedTaxBenefits**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**credit**Period Type:**instant |
mygn-ex101_186.htm



Exhibit 10.1

Attachment

Each of the following executive officers of Myriad Genetics, Inc. has entered into the Company’s standard form Executive Retention Agreement. 

 


		
	
Executive Officer
	
Execution Date

	
Mark C. Capone,

   President and Chief Executive Officer
	
November 17, 2006, as amended October 12, 2007, and further amended September 29, 2015

	
Alexander Ford,

   President, Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.
	
July 1, 2015, as amended September 29, 2015

	
Gary A. King,                         

   EVP International Operations
	
July 8, 2010, as amended September 29, 2015

	
Jerry S. Lanchbury, Ph.D.,    

   Chief Scientific Officer
	
February 17, 2005, as amended October 12, 2007, and further amended September 29, 2015

	
Richard M. Marsh, Esq.,        

   EVP, General Counsel and Secretary                                                               
	
February 17, 2005, as amended October 12, 2007, and further amended September 29, 2015

	
Ralph L. McDade,

   President, Myriad RBM, Inc.
	
September 29, 2015

	
R. Bryan Riggsbee,               

   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
	
December 18, 2014, as amended September 29, 2015

	
Bernard F. Tobin,

   President, Crescendo Biosciences, Inc.
	
December 19, 2014, as amended September 29, 2015

	
Mark Verratti,

   President, Assurex Health, Inc.
	
September 19, 2017
| **Assets and Liabilities of SCB Recorded at Provisional Fair Value (Parenthetical) (Detail) (SCB Bank [Member], USD $)In Millions, unless otherwise specified** | Feb. 10, 2012 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|---------------|
| SCB Bank [Member]                                                                                                                                               |          |
| **Business Acquisition [Line Items]**                                                                                                                           |          |
| Cash received from FDIC                                                                                                                                         | $ 17.2        |

| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Business Acquisition Purchase Price Allocation Cash Received From Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**frme_BusinessAcquisitionPurchasePriceAllocationCashReceivedFromFederalDepositInsuranceCorporation**Namespace Prefix:**frme_**Data Type:**xbrli:monetaryItemType**Balance Type:**debit**Period Type:**instant |
| X                                                                                                                                                                |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_BusinessAcquisitionLineItems**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 1, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 80017]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22428]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Office of the Secretary


List of Countries Requiring Cooperation With an International 
Boycott

    In accordance with section 999(a)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986, the Department of the Treasury is publishing a current list of 
countries which require or may require participation in, or cooperation 
with, an international boycott (within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) 
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986).
    On the basis of the best information currently available to the 
Department of the Treasury, the following countries require or may 
require participation in, or cooperation with, an international boycott 
(within the meaning of section 999(b)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code 
of 1986).

Iraq
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Syria
Yemen

Lindsay Kitzinger,
International Tax Counsel (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2024-22428 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-AK-P
```

[Congressional Bills 114th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 3254 Introduced in House (IH)]

114th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 3254

 To amend the Dale Long Public Safety Officers' Benefits Improvements 
 Act of 2012 to change the retroactive application of the Act to cover 
  injuries sustained by rescue squad or ambulance crew members on or 
           after December 1, 2007, rather than June 1, 2009.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 28, 2015

  Mr. Marino introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Dale Long Public Safety Officers' Benefits Improvements 
 Act of 2012 to change the retroactive application of the Act to cover 
  injuries sustained by rescue squad or ambulance crew members on or 
           after December 1, 2007, rather than June 1, 2009.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Kline DeWire Public Safety Officers' 
Retroactive Benefits Act''.

SEC. 2. RETROACTIVE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR DALE LONG PUBLIC SAFETY 
              OFFICERS' BENEFITS IMPROVEMENTS ACT OF 2012.

    Subsection (d)(2)(A) of the Dale Long Public Safety Officers' 
Benefits Improvements Act of 2012 (section 1086 of Public Law 112-239; 
126 Stat. 1969; 42 U.S.C. 3791 note) is amended--
            (1) by striking ``this Act'' and inserting ``this 
        section''; and
            (2) by striking ``June 1, 2009'' and inserting ``December 
        1, 2007''.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

                                                                      EXHIBIT 18

February 4, 1998



Playboy Enterprises, Inc.
680 North Lake Shore Drive
Chicago, Illinois 60611


We are providing this letter to you for inclusion as an exhibit to your Form
10-K filing pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

We have read management's justification contained in the Company's Form 10-K for
the six month period ended December 31, 1997 for the change in accounting from
the capitalization of start-up costs to the expensing of start-up costs as
incurred in accordance with the proposed Statement of Position, "Reporting on
the Costs of Start-up Activities". Based on our reading of the data and
discussions with Company officials about the business judgment and business
planning factors relating to the change, we believe management's justification
to be reasonable. Accordingly, we concur that the newly adopted accounting
principle described above is preferable in the Company's circumstances to the
method previously applied.




/s/ Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.


Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.