alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022120EN.01002201.xml

| 15.3.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 120/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.3.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 120/22

---

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case M.10625 – CARLYLE GROUP / MACQUARIE GROUP / HYCC)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(2022/C 120/03)

On 9 March 2022, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the internal market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (1). The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

| — | in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes, |
| --- | --- |

—

in the merger section of the ‘Competition policy’ website of the Commission (http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases/). This website provides various facilities to help locate individual merger decisions, including company, case number, date and sectoral indexes,

| — | in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10625. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law. |
| --- | --- |

—

in electronic form on the EUR-Lex website (http://eur-lex.europa.eu/homepage.html?locale=en) under document number 32022M10625. EUR-Lex is the online point of access to European Union law.

---

(1)  OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         September 19, 2024.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on September 5, 2024, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 300 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-621, CP2024-629.                

Sean C. Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2024-21313 Filed 9-18-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED> 
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1996
<CASH>                                             735
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,975
<ALLOWANCES>                                       276
<INVENTORY>                                      3,729
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,677
<PP&E>                                          13,745
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,506
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  57,531
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,126
<BONDS>                                         26,815
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      1,654
<COMMON>                                         4,227
<OTHER-SE>                                      13,445
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    57,531
<SALES>                                         59,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,330
<CGS>                                           49,456
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   58,981
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,923
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,557)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (459)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,599)
<DISCONTINUED>                                    (94)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,693)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (.68)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.68)
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Channell Commercial
Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
William H. Channell, Sr., Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report complies fully with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ William H. Channell, Sr.
----------------------------------
William H. Channell, Sr.
Chief Executive Officer
August 5, 2002
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 25, 2011 

h0418 

Order 

 

April 25, 2011 

142486 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142486 

 COA: 300588 

Eaton CC: 09-020323-FH; 

NICHOLAS ALLEN MILBOURN, 09-020324-FH; 09-020288-FH 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 2, 2010 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
#### BAKER v. STATE.

No. 15800.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

March 22, 1933.

R. E. Dickson, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

LATTIMORE, Judge.

Conviction for selling a narcotic drug; punishment, five years in the penitentiary.

The Legislature, in defining the term “narcotic drug,” makes it include many drugs specifically named. In other words, by the very terms of the act, which is chapter 97, Acts Regular Session, 42d Leg. (Vernon’s Ann. P. C. art. 725a, § 1 et seq.), “narcotic drug” is made a generic term, in which case, under many authorities, it is not enough that one indicted for a violation' of the ¿provisions of said act be charged with possession, sale, etc., of narcotic drugs; but such indictment should go further and name the particular drug so possessed, or sold in the particular case. Brewer v. State, 5 Tex. App. 248; McAfee v. State, 38 Tex. Cr. R. 124, 41 S. W. 627; Dixon v. State, 21 Tex. App. 517, 1 S. W. 448; Kennedy v. State, 86 Tex. Cr. *536R. 450, 216 S. W. 1086; Todd v. State, 89 Tex. Cr. R. 99, 229 S. W. 515; Stanford v. State, 99 Tex. Cr. R. 111, 268 S. W. 161. The indictment in the instant case should have added to the avetment that a narcotic drug was possessed, a further allegation such as, to wit, morphine — or whatever drug was involved.

The indictment being insufficient, the judgment is reversed and the cause dismissed.
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of AppealsCAAP-12-000060124-SEP-201208:53 AM
Albany

Atlanta

Brussels

Denver

Los Angeles

Miami

New York 1676 International Drive • Penthouse

McLean, VA 22102

Tel : 703.336.8800

mckennalong.com Northern Virginia

Orange County

Rancho Santa Fe

San Diego

San Francisco

Seoul

Washington, DC

Dane B. Jaques

703.336.8709

Mark E. McKinnon

703.336.8708

Matthew J. Clark

703.336. 8714 Email Address

djaques@mckennalong.com

mmckinnon@mckennalong.com

mclark@mckennalong.com June 1, 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

Re: Submission of Additional Information in Support of PG&E's Petition for

Exemption (Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 0708 )

To Whom it May Concern :

As you are aware, this office represents Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) regarding

the above

- referenced Petition for Exemption, in which PG&E seeks regulatory relief to allow

commercial operation of small unmanned aircraft system ( sUAS). Please accept this letter as

confirmation of our response to the Request for Additional Information received from Nia Daniels,

Program Analyst, Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Safety, Airmen and Airspace

Rules Division

, on May 18 , 2015.

The additional supporting material contains proprietary and confidential information and was

submitted electronically to Ms. Daniels and via e

- mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov on June 1 , 2015.

If you have any questions or require any additional information to process PG&E's Petition,

please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned.

M C K ENNA L ONG & A LDRIDGE LLP

Dane B. Jaques

Mark E. McKinnon

Matthew J. Clark

Counsel for Pacific Gas and Electric Company
#### Harter Holding Co., Appellee, *v.*Perkins et al. ; McCulloch, Appellant.

(No. 29069

Decided April 1, 1942.)

*Messrs. Blade, McCuskey, Souers & Arbaugh*and *Mr. Donald K. Merwin,*for appellee.

*Mr. Frank T. Bow,*for appellant.

It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

*Appeal dismissed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Bettman, J., not participating.
ex_97454.htm


Exhibit 4.14


 


HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC. 


 


EIN# 46-3590875


 


 


 


BOARD OF DIRECTORS RESOLUTION TO GRANT RESTRICTED STOCK GRANT 


AWARDS TO EXECUTIVES, BOARD MEMBERS AND CONSULTANTS


 


Upon a duly made, seconded and unanimously adopted consent, the Board of Directors of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC adopted the following resolution it is hereby:


 


RESOLVED that, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”), has determined that the grant of Restricted shares of the Company’s Common Stock to CYRUS SAJNA. as an effective means to align management interest with stockholder interests;


 


IT IS RESOLVED that, the following restricted shares are hereby granted


 


	
			Name of Grantee

				Class of Stock	Number of Shares Granted	Amount Vested	
			Par Value

			
	
			 CYRUS SAJNA

				
			Common

				
			8,200,000

				
			8,200,000

				
			$.0001

			
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
			Total Shares Granted

				 	
			 8,200,000

				
			 

				 



 


 


The undersigned, Debbie Carter, certifies that I am the duly appointed Chief Executive Officer of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC and that the above is a true and correct copy of resolutions duly adopted at a meeting of the directors thereof, convened and held in accordance with law and the Bylaws of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC and that such resolution is now in full force and effect.


 


IN WITNESS THEREOF, I have affixed my name as Secretary of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC and have attached the seal of HOVERINK BIOTECHNOLOGIES, INC to this resolution.


 


Dated The     Day Of


 


 


                                                        


Debbie Carter,


Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer
Exhibit
31.1
 
 CERTIFICATION
OF PRESIDENT
 
 
 I,
Jeffrey J. Raymond, certify that:
 
 1           I
have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period
ended September 30, 2008 of Hyperion Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”);
 
 2.           Based
on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of
a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;
 
 3.           Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant
as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
 4.           The registrant’s
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:
 
 (a)           Designed
such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 (b)           Evaluated
the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures
and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 
 (c)           Disclosed
in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financing reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
 
 5.           The registrant's
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):
 
 (a)           All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonable likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 (b)           Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involved management or other employees who
have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
  Hyperion Energy,
      Inc.Date:  November
      13, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Jeffrey
      J. RaymondName: 
      Jeffrey J. RaymondTitle: 
      President
EXHIBIT 10.09


March 19, 1996

Mr. Richard Rose
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Penril DataComm Networks, Inc.
1300 Quince Orchard Blvd.
Gaithersburg,  MD 20878

Dear Rick:

        The following updates my letter of January 18, 1995 concerning 
our understanding regarding the possible sale of Penril DataComm 
Networks, Inc. and is effective for one year from the date hereof 
("Anniversary Date").

        This understanding will automatically renew on the Anniversary 
Date, as long as you continue as an employee of Penril, unless either 
party gives written notice to the other sixty (60) days prior to the 
Anniversary Date.  As you know, Penril DataComm Networks, Inc. is not 
actively solicity buyers for the company.

        If Penril DataComm Networks, Inc. is sold with your assistance 
and support and if you agree to remain under the new ownership for a 
period of at least one year in your current or similar position, then 
Penril will:

        Guarantee the payment of that year's salary at your then 
        current rate.  In addition, Penril will pay you a bonus of 
        $150,000.  Payment of the bonus will be made within sixty (60)
        days after the transaction closes.

        Additionally, Penril has guaranteed you a performance bonus of
        $50,000 for calendar 1996.  If the company is sold prior to 
        December 31, 1996 we will prorate the bonus accordingly.

                                        Sincerely,

                                        \s\Henry D. Epstein
                                        --------------------
Accepted:

\s\R.D.Rose
------------------
Richard Rose
F OR P UB L I CAT I ON U N I TED STA TES C O U R T O F A PPEA LS F O RT H E N IN T H C IR C U IT R O C I O BR EN D A H EN R I Q U EZRI V AS , P eti ti on er , v. E R IC H . H O L D E RJr. , A tt orn ey G e n e r al , R e s p o n d e n t. N o. 09- 71571 A ge nc yN o. A 098- 660- 718 O R D ER

KOZ I NS KI , C hi ef

Judg e: U po n the vo t e of am aj ori ty of non re cuse d active j ud ges, i ti s order ed that th is c a s e b e r e h e ar de nb an c p ur s u an t to C ir c u it Ru le 3 5 - 3 . 

# FI LED JAN 31 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
Exhibit
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


RULE
13A-14(B) OR RULE 15D-14(B)


OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September
30, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the “Report”), I, Johnny R. Thomas, Chief Executive Officer of
Consolidation Services, Inc., Inc. (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(a)
            The
      Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and




(b)
            The
      information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.






Dated:
November 14, 2008


CONSOLIDATION
SERVICES, INC.






By:/s/ Johnny R.
Thomas


Johnny R.
Thomas


Chief
Executive Officer




A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Consolidation Services, Inc. and will be
retained by Consolidation Services, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 11



STATEMENT RE COMPUTATION OF PER SHARE EARNINGS





The following presents the computation of per share earnings reflecting the assumption that dilutive stock options are exercised.



(IN THOUSANDS EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)2006
        
        2005
        
        2004Net earnings (1)
        
        $
        27,960
        
        $
        16,417
        
        $
        15,441Weighted average common shares outstanding (2)
        
        
        6,831
        
        
        6,826
        
        
        6,821Common share equivalents relating to stock options
        
        
        
        
        
        1
        
        
        2Adjusted common and common equivalent shares for computation (3)
        
        
        6,831
        
        
        6,827
        
        
        6,823Net earnings per share:Basic (1 / 2)
        
        $
        4.09
        
        $
        2.41
        
        $
        2.26Diluted (1 / 3)
        
        $
        4.09
        
        $
        2.40
        
        $
        2.26






---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7384
KEITH PRESTWOOD, Petitioner - Appellant, versus J. R. HUNT, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-96-564-5-H-3) Submitted: October 29, 1996 Decided: December 10, 1996 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Keith Prestwood, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record andthe district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss on the reasoning of the district court. Prestwood v. Hunt , No. CA-96-564- 5-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Aug. 21, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7887

FRANKLIN DALE BROWNER, SR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle

District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,

District Judge. (CA-00-748-1)

Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 27, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Franklin Dale Browner, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. John Warren Stone,

Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina,

for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Franklin Dale Browner, Sr. appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Browner v. United States,

No. CA-00-748-1 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED