alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,491
<ALLOWANCES>                                       977
<INVENTORY>                                      7,004
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                12,051
<PP&E>                                           4,286
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  20,478
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           16,215
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            5,000
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,527
<OTHER-SE>                                     (35,190)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    20,478
<SALES>                                         21,893
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,893
<CGS>                                           20,730
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,730
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                14,244
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   389
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,038
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (15,223)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (15,223)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (15,223)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (5.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (5.01)
        

</TABLE>
[No. 45891-4-I.

Division One.

November 13, 2000.]

#### *In the Matter of the Marriage of*Laura Beth Christensen (Clark), *Respondent,*and Edward E. Law, *Appellant.*

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for King County, No. 90-3-06378-3, Patricia H. Clark, J., entered December 13, 1999. *Affirmed in part, reversed in part,*and *remanded*by unpublished per curiam opinion.
----

(2004/C 78 E/0888)

WRITTEN QUESTION E-3614/03

by Esko Seppänen (GUE/NGL) to the Commission

(5 December 2003)

Subject:   Cultivation of sweet rowanberries

The Commission has exclusive competence for agricultural support. Hence this question: have the authorities of a Member State acted correctly in not allocating agricultural support to all farmers on the same basis but allocating it according to their place of residence? The Finnish authorities have not granted the appropriate support to farmers who cultivate sweet rowanberries in what the authorities consider to be the ‘wrong’ part of the country, i.e. in an area which is not a berry cultivation area. Are rowanberries which have been bred so as to make them sweet defined as berries or fruit?

Answer given by Mr Fischler on behalf of the Commission

(29 January 2004)

Member States can as their priorities dictate subsidize particular crops provided that the aid is compatible with Community law. Up to now they have had to submit all such proposed aids to the Commission for clearance as compatible (see Community guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector (1)). We have however recently adopted as part of the CAP reform a set of rules (2) under which Member States will be able to grant agricultural aids falling into certain categories without first having to request our approval. These block exemptions will speed up implementation of the new agricultural State aids and also facilitate implementation of the national programmes to raise environmental, animal welfare and hygiene standards in agriculture.

In the absence of precise information on the measure to which the Honourable Member refers we cannot comment on its compatibility with Community law.

On the question of whether the fruit (pihlajanmarja in Finnish) yielded by the rowan tree (Sorbus aucuparia) is a fruit or a berry, we consider that it is a berry and hence also a fruit, since berries are by definition also fruits.

----

(1)OJ C 28, 1.2.2000.

(2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 1/2004 of 23 December 2003 on the application of Articles 87 and 88 of the EC Treaty to State aid to small and medium-sized enterprises active in the production, processing and marketing of agricultural products, OJ L 1, 3.1.2004.

----
# Official Journal C 278A/2012

| | ISSN 1977-091X
  doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.278.eng |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 278A |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 5514 September 2012 |

ISSN 1977-091X

doi:10.3000/1977091X.CA2012.278.eng

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 278A

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 5514 September 2012

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | V   Announcements |
| | ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES |
| | European Medicines Agency |
| 2012/C 278A/01 | Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London) | 1 |
| 2012/C 278A/02 | Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London) | 2 |
| 2012/C 278A/03 | Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London) | 3 |
| 2012/C 278A/04 | Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London) | 4 |

Notice No

Contents

page

V   Announcements

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES

European Medicines Agency

2012/C 278A/01

Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London)

1

2012/C 278A/02

Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London)

2

2012/C 278A/03

Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London)

3

2012/C 278A/04

Recruitment to the European Medicines Agency (London)

4

---

REVIEW OF COMPETITION C A OJs

Please find below the list of C A published during the present year.

Unless otherwise indicated, OJs are published in all language versions.

| 8 | (DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL) |
| --- | --- |
| 10 | |
| 17 | (LT) |
| 20 | (EN) |
| 22 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 27 | |
| 30 | (FR) |
| 31 | (ES) |
| 37 | |
| 44 | |
| 46 | |
| 53 | |
| 55 | |
| 59 | |
| 69 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 70 | (EL) |
| 71 | (ES) |
| 74 | (HU) |
| 75 | (NL) |
| 76 | |
| 77 | (RO) |
| 84 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 86 | |
| 90 | (EN) |
| 101 | |
| 110 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 114 | |
| 121 | (BG) |
| 122 | |
| 134 | |
| 136 | (PT) |
| 140 | |
| 144 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 146 | (CS/DA) |
| 160 | |
| 161 | |
| 169 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 180 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 187 | |
| 189 | |
| 197 | (DA/DE/EN/SK) |
| 198 | (EN/FR) |
| 199 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 204 | (ET/GA/LV/PT) |
| 206 | (CS) |
| 210 | (LT) |
| 211 | (MT) |
| 212 | (PL) |
| 214 | (SK) |
| 215 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 228 | (SL) |
| 266 | |
| 270 | |
| 274 | (CS) |
| 275 | (LV) |
| 276 | (DE/EN/FR) |
| 278 | |

8

(DA/EL/HU/IT/MT/PL)

10

17

(LT)

20

(EN)

22

(DE/EN/FR)

27

30

(FR)

31

(ES)

37

44

46

53

55

59

69

(DE/EN/FR)

70

(EL)

71

(ES)

74

(HU)

75

(NL)

76

77

(RO)

84

(DE/EN/FR)

86

90

(EN)

101

110

(DE/EN/FR)

114

121

(BG)

122

134

136

(PT)

140

144

(DE/EN/FR)

146

(CS/DA)

160

161

169

(DE/EN/FR)

180

(DE/EN/FR)

187

189

197

(DA/DE/EN/SK)

198

(EN/FR)

199

(DE/EN/FR)

204

(ET/GA/LV/PT)

206

(CS)

210

(LT)

211

(MT)

212

(PL)

214

(SK)

215

(DE/EN/FR)

228

(SL)

266

270

274

(CS)

275

(LV)

276

(DE/EN/FR)

278

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**Certification****of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial
      Officer**


**Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to**


**Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Shelby Acquisition I, Inc. (the
      "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended October 31, 2007 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
      James R. Kerr, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
                James R. KerrJames
                R. KerrPrincipal
                Executive OfficerPrincipal
                Financial OfficerMarch
                11, 2008
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

January 19, 2007 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

130310 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. JAMES D. AZZAR, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices 

and 

PROCESSING SOLUTIONS, LIMITED, 

Plaintiff, 

v SC: 130310 

 COA: 260438 

Kent CC: 03-011760-NZ 

CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS,

Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

BERNARD C. SCHAEFER, and

ROBERT J. KRUIS, 

Defendants. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral 

arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we VACATE our order of 

May 4, 2006. The application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2005 judgment of 

the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because we are no longer persuaded that the questions 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

s0116 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

January 19, 2007 

Clerk
# Official Journal C 96/20 A

| | ISSN 1725-2423 |
| --- | --- |
| Official Journal
  of the European Union | C 96 |
| | |
| English edition | Information and Notices | Volume 4820 April 2005 |

ISSN 1725-2423

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 96

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 4820 April 2005

---

| Notice No | Contents | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | I   Information |
| | Court of Auditors |
| 2005/C 096/1 | Decision No 12-2005 of the Court of Auditors of the European Communities of 10 March 2005 regarding public access to Court of Auditors documents | 1 |

Notice No

Contents

page

I   Information

Court of Auditors

2005/C 096/1

Decision No 12-2005 of the Court of Auditors of the European Communities of 10 March 2005 regarding public access to Court of Auditors documents

1

---

| EN | |
| --- | --- |

EN
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 

EottoPaitle John H. UlnterE 

Exeaatlve Director 

state Departmnt OS PubllC Welfare 

Attatln, Texas 

Deal@ fur: 

Bonerablo John B. Ulntefa, pge 3 

. iiewe oSthm opittloa, therefore,the&mrd oSCaatro1 ia correct ln ita po8ltlon tbrt the skpRamnt's mqmJwtltatlve8 we u1thout c, ior BU 

G 

10, to a-tar oaths 

tar 8uah itwl8 a8 truto "f 

o th wmttetr mtb r tdo no tr e~~~i~ 

owl 88lntewnw und 

cant8 sor uwl8tuM6. 

l lL@blUty& app1%- 

m wtt0t, 0r ~0~86, gc~ci~4 defi~ 

tha boundary llae beWeea the80 iield8 oi duty kcauae we do 

not hare she tacta b6ioro Its. St% the Depwtmant reprewattbtivw should aluuym be able 80 judge whether the mdnita8trutlom of an oah or the taUng of un l aknovledgaeat form8 8 

part OS tha mcarear~ steps ln e8tabliw the ellgibillty of 

an applioant. 

VorJ truly ymtr8 

ATTl%t?iEX - OF !iZWd 

Emdb
IIB 

114TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. R. 2984 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 15, 2016 

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

AN ACT 

To amend the Federal Power Act to provide that any inaction by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission that 

allows a rate change to go into effect shall be treated 

as an order by the Commission for purposes of rehearing 

and court review. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

HR 2984 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Fair Ratepayer Ac3 countability, Transparency, and Efficiency Standards 

4 Act’’ or the ‘‘Fair RATES Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE FEDERAL POWER ACT. 

6 Subsection (d) of section 205 of the Federal Power 

7 Act (16 U.S.C. 824d(d)) is amended by adding at the end 

8 the following: ‘‘Any absence of action by the Commission 

9 that allows a change to take effect under this section, in10 cluding the Commission allowing the sixty days’ notice 

11 herein provided to expire without Commission action, shall 

12 be treated as an order issued by the Commission accepting 

13 such change for purposes of section 313.’’. 

Passed the House of Representatives March 14, 

2016. 

Attest: KAREN L. HAAS, 

Clerk. 


asabaliauskas on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# STATEOFLOUISIANA



# COURTOFAPPEAL,FIRSTCIRCUIT

MICHAEL GUILLORY VERSUS 

### STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF 

### ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY NO. 

### 2021 CW 1621


### FEBRUARY 25, 2022

In Re: The Louisiana Department of 

### Environmental 

### Quality and

The Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, applying 

## forsupervisorywrits, 19th Judicial District Court, 

### Parish of East Baton Rouge, No. 

### 705981.
BEFORE: WHIPPLE, C.J., PENZATOAND HESTER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED. VGW CHH Penzato, J., dissents. The 

### amending petition 

### seeking a 

## declaratoryjudgment 

## filed byplaintiff, Patrick Keith, 

### tails to state a cause of action against relators, the Louisiana 

## Departmentof Environmental Qualityandthe Louisiana Department 

### of Natural Resources as the allegations set forth therein do not raise claims that fall within the purview of La. Const. art. 

### 12, 10, which waives sovereign 

## immunity from suits 

### for 

## injury to person or 

### property. 

## Accordingly, I would reverse the 

### district court' s 

### judgment and sustain relators' exception of no cause of action but afford Patrick Keith an 

### opportunity to amend his petition, 

### if he can, to state a cause of action against relators. See La. Code Civ. P. art. 934.



### COURT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT



## i
DEPUTY LERK OF COURT FOR THE COURT
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 August 9, 2007
    /s/ MARK A. JACKSONMark A. JacksonChairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
of Noble Corporation
H. R. 3059 

One Hundred Fourteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the sixth day of January, two thousand and fifteen 

An Act 

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4500 SE 

28th Street, Del City, Oklahoma, as the James Robert Kalsu Post Office Building. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. JAMES ROBERT KALSU POST OFFICE BUILDING. 

(a) DESIGNATION.—The facility of the United States Postal 

Service located at 4500 SE 28th Street, Del City, Oklahoma, shall 

be known and designated as the ‘‘James Robert Kalsu Post Office 

Building’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, paper, or other record of the United States to the facility 

referred to in subsection (a) shall be deemed to be a reference 

to the ‘‘James Robert Kalsu Post Office Building’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of PHOENIX MEDICAL SOFTWARE, INC. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1. the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.








Dated:  May 16, 2011





/s/ P. Morgan McCune





Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Executive Officer











Dated:  May 16, 2011





/s/ P. Morgan McCune





Name: P. Morgan McCune


Title:  Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of DC BRANDS INTERNATIONAL, INC. (the "Registrant") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Bob Armstrong, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.





/s/ Bob ArmstrongBob Armstrong

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)





November 22, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Laura Buss Sayavedra, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|---------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 6, 2009 |  |  |  | /s/    LAURA BUSS
SAYAVEDRA                                                                                                                                                                          
|                       |  |  |  | Laura Buss Sayavedra Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP,
LLC General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
#### RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS et al. v. PETERSON.

No. 8638.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin.

July 14, 1937.

*290Wm. McCraw, Atty. Gen., and Curtis E. Hill, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellants.

Felts, Wheeler & Wheeler, of Austin, for appellee.

BLAIR, Justice.

This is a companion case to Railroad Commission et al. v. Bates, 108 S.W.(2d) 286, this day decided by this court. The parties have agreed that the controlling issues of law and fact are the same, and copies of the briefs in the Bates Case have been filed as the briefs in the instant case. Suffice it to say here that appellee M. L. Peterson alleged in substance that he was engaged prior to the effective date of the Federal Motor Carrier Act of 1935, 49 U.S.C.A. §§ 301-327, in transporting interstate commerce exclusively, and particularly fruits, vegetables, celery, lettuce, berries, and other products raised in Texas and the southwest, and in old Mexico, by some eight motortrucks over the highways of Texas, and being engaged exclusively in foreign and interstate commerce; that he filed his application with the I. C. C. within the time and in accordance with the terms of the act, for a certificate of convenience and necessity, which had been heard but had not been finally passed upon, and' that he was under the terms of the act entitled to continue his operation until final action on his application; that he had complied with all laws of Texas with respect to the size and weight of vehicles used, proper safety lights and appliances, and had furnished all character of insurance required by the State of Texas; but notwithstanding these facts appellants had arrested him and his truck drivers, and were threatening to continue to arrest them, unless appellee obtained a certificate of convenience and necessity from the Railroad Commission of Texas, to the irreparable injury of appellee's business; and he prayed for a temporary injunction to be made permanent upon final hearing. Appel-lee's pleadings were duly verified, and after notice a temporary injunction was granted on the facts alleged, appellants not having filed an answer, nor controverted the facts in any manner.

The order or judgment of the trial court appealed from will be affirmed upon the authority of the decision of this court in the Bates Case, supra.

Affirmed.