alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee, October 24-25, 2024, 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on July 23, 2024, 89 FR 59744.                

This meeting will be amended to change the meeting time from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. to 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. for both days. An open session is added from 10-10:30 a.m. on October 25, 2024.

                    The open session of the meeting will be virtual. Any interested person may file written comments with the committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice no later than 7 days prior to the meeting. The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and, when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the interested person. Individuals who need special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should notify Dianne Babski, Associate Director, Division of Library Operations, National Library of Medicine at                     *babskid@mail.nih.gov*. The open session will be videocast and can be accessed from the NIH Videocast website at                     *https://videocast.nih.gov/​*.                

Dated: September 25, 2024.

Miguelina Perez,

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-22436 Filed 9-30-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

)

MASHPEE WAMPANOAG TRIBE, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 18-2242 (PLF)

)

DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official )

capacity as Secretary of the Interior, et al., )

)

Defendants, )

)

and )

)

DAVID LITTLEFIELD, et al., )

)

Defendant-Intervenors. )

____________________________________)

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the motion [Dkt. No. 65] of members of 

Congress for leave to file a brief as amici curiae in support of the plaintiff. The plaintiff consents

to this motion, and neither the federal defendants nor the defendant-intervenors have stated a 

position at this time.

This Court has “broad discretion” in determining whether to permit a party to 

participate in a lawsuit as amicus curiae. Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands v. 

United States, Civil Action No. 08-1572, 2009 WL 596986, at *1 (D.D.C. Mar. 6, 2009) (citing 

Nat’l Ass’n of Home Builders v. United States Army Corps of Engineers, 519 F.Supp.2d 89, 93 

(D.D.C. 2007)); see also United States v. Microsoft Corp., Civil Action No. 98-1232 2002 WL 

319366, at *2 (D.D.C. Feb. 28, 2002). The filing of an amicus brief should be permitted if it will 
2

assist the judge “by presenting ideas, arguments, theories, insights, facts or data that are not to be 

found in the parties’ briefs.” Voices for Choices v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co., 339 F.3d 542, 

545 (7th Cir. 2003). See also Ryan v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 125 F.3d 1062, 

1063 (7th Cir. 1997) (“An amicus brief should normally be allowed when . . . the amicus has 

unique information or perspective that can help the court beyond the help that the lawyers for the 

parties are able to provide.”).

Upon careful consideration, the Court concludes that the members of Congress’s 

proposed brief will assist the Court in this matter because it includes unique arguments not found 

in the parties’ briefs, and thus, the Court may benefit from its input. The Court will therefore 

permit the members of Congress to participate in this matter as amici curiae by filing their

proposed amicus brief. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED that the members of Congress’s motion [Dkt. No. 65] for leave to file 

a brief as amici curiae in support of the plaintiff is GRANTED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the members of 

Congress’s amicus brief [Dkt. No. 65-1] on the docket.

SO ORDERED.

 /s/ 

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN

United States District Judge

DATE: May 28, 2020
EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Robert Lazzeri, President and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d),as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date:    October 27, 2008
                                            /s/ Robert Lazzeri
                                            -------------------
                                            Robert Lazzeri
                                            President and Director


<PAGE>
[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as 

Swartz v. Householder, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5817.] 

NOTICE 

This slip opinion is subject to formal revision before it is published in an 

advance sheet of the Ohio Official Reports. Readers are requested to 

promptly notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of Ohio, 65 

South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio 43215, of any typographical or other 

formal errors in the opinion, in order that corrections may be made before 

the opinion is published. 

SLIP OPINION NO. 2016-OHIO-5817

SWARTZ, APPELLEE, v. HOUSEHOLDER ET AL., APPELLANTS. 

SHANNON ET AL., APPELLEES, V. HOUSEHOLDER ET AL., APPELLANTS. 

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it 

may be cited as Swartz v. Householder, Slip Opinion No. 2016-Ohio-5817.] 

Court of appeals’ judgments reversed on the authority of Corban v. Chesapeake 

Exploration, L.L.C., and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau. 

(Nos. 2014-1208 and 2014-1209—Submitted August 31, 2016—Decided 

September 15, 2016.) 

APPEALS from the Court of Appeals for Jefferson County, 

Nos. 13 JE 24 and 13 JE 25, 2014-Ohio-2359. 

__________________ 

{¶ 1} The judgments of the court of appeals are reversed on the authority of 

Corban v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-5796, 

___ N.E.3d ___, and Walker v. Shondrick-Nau, ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio5793, ___ N.E.3d ___. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2

O’CONNOR, C.J., and O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, KENNEDY, and FRENCH, JJ., 

concur. 

PFEIFER and O’NEILL, JJ., dissent. 

_________________ 

 Critchfield, Critchfield & Johnston, Ltd., Steven J. Shrock, and Clinton 

Bailey, for appellees. 

 Burton Law, L.L.C., and Robert L. Guehl, for appellants. 

_________________
##### 



MAXCO, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with this annual report on Form 10-K/A of Maxco, Inc. (the
Company) for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Max A. Coon, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) This Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) Information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. Date: July 29, 2004 /s/ Max A. CoonMax A. CoonChief Executive Officer
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

                                  Exhibit 10.8

           SUMMARY OF COMPANY'S 1997 MANAGEMENT INCENTIVE PLAN (MIP)
                             Pitt-Des Moines, Inc.



Under the terms of the MIP, a minimum rate of return of (threshold) on
stockholders' equity must be achieved before bonuses can be awarded.  The
threshold for executive officers was established at the after-tax cost of
capital on the assumption that returns in excess of the threshold would lead to
increases in stockholder value.  Once this criteria is met, the total amount of
bonus available for distribution to eligible executive officers, including the
Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") under the MIP is based on a percentage
in excess of the minimum return on stockholders' equity.  Individual bonus
amounts paid to the Company's executive officers for services rendered in 1997,
including the CEO, were based on a pre-determined percentage limitation on each
individual's base salary (in no case does the applicable limit exceed 100% of
base salary) and the percentage of the overall MIP target achieved.  These pre-
determined percentages were established by the Compensation Committee.

Under the terms of the MIP, the Company's eligible executive officers were
entitled to receive and were awarded bonuses under the MIP for the year ended
December 31, 1997.
##### 



Exhibit 16.1




---



##### 



Item 4.01 Changes in Registrants Certifying Accountant.
EPA Attends Small Business Administration (SBA) Meeting on TSCA Title VI Proposed Rules

Location: SBA Headquarters, 409 3rd St, SW, Washington DC 20416

Date and Time: July, 19th, 2013 at 10 a.m.

EPA staff in the National Program Chemicals Division presented at an SBA stakeholders meeting on the 

two proposed rules to implement Title VI of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Small business 

representatives from the composite wood industry, law firms, trade associations and other interested 

stakeholders attended the meeting along with SBA staff. Stakeholders at the meeting focused primarily

on the definition of laminated products. Several attendees posed questions on whether their products 

fell under the proposed definition of laminated products and hardwood plywood. Other topics discussed 

included questions regarding downstream recordkeeping requirements and ultra-low emitting 

formaldehyde resins. EPA staff encouraged the meeting attendees to submit comments on their 

particular areas of concern and asked that data be included to help support their positions.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
 Date: August 14, 2007
    /s/    C. Gregory HarperC. Gregory HarperPresident and Chief Executive Officer
**Amendment to Petition ID:** FAA
- 2015
- 2388
- 0001

To w hom it may concern, I, Matthew

Roderick wish to amend my petition to correct an error in the proposed operating limits of my Unmanned Aerial System (UAS). On Page 21, item number 4, I originally stated: 4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 500 feet above ground level (AGL), as indicated b y the procedures specified in the operating documents unless a special request is made and approved b y ATC. All altitudes reported to ATC must be i n feet AGL. This proposed operating limit would exceed the built
in safety limits of the Unmanned Aircraft (UA) as w ell as the limits currently

set forth by

the Administrator. I w ish to reduce the proposed operating limit to 400 feet above ground level (AGL). All other mentions of operations at anything more than 400 feet AGL are in error and should read “no more than 400 feet AGL”. I appreciate your further consideration on this matter and I’ve included my

contact information below if there are any f urther concerns. Respectfully, Matthew Roderick 208.866
- 6598 matt@airequipco.com
#### Raymond Oxendine, an Infant, by Edward Oxendine, His Guardian ad Litem, Plaintiff, *v.*City of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, Bronx County,

February 7, 1957.

*Clifford A. Scott*for plaintiff.

*Tropp & Steinbock*for New York City Housing Authority, defendant.

Francis X. Conlon, J.

This is an application for an order allowing plaintiff to serve a belated notice of claim *nunc pro tunc,*upon the New York City Housing Authority. The infant plaintiff was 10 years of age at the time of the accident, which occurred on August 29, 1955. A notice of claim was served on the comptroller of the City of New York but not on the New York City Housing Authority. The summons and complaint was served on the housing authority on October 13, 1955, and the authority thereafter appeared in the action. In certain instances the court has discretion in allowing late notices of claim. However, the controlling statute, subdivision 5 of section 50-e of the General Municipal Law, is clear and definite in situations such as here presented. That subdivision states in part: “Application for such leave *must*be made within the *258period of *one year*after the happening of the event upon which the claim is based (Italics supplied.) In *Matter of Martin*v. *School Bd. (Long Beach)*(301 N. Y. 233, 239), the court in considering this subdivision said: *‘ ‘*Wise or unwise, fair or harsh, that law is as binding on the courts as it is on this petitioner and on everyone else.”

Service of the notice of claim on the comptroller of the City of New York does not constitute service on the New York City Housing Authority. *(Matter of Ringgold*v. *New York City Tr. Auth.,*286 App. Div. 806; *Matter of Coyle*v. *New York City Tr. Auth.,*283 App. Div. 1083.)

Accordingly, the motion is denied.
Memorandum

To: Docket Number 2010
- 1 From: Timothy Creagan Senior Accessibility Specialist U.S. Access Board RE: Ex Parte Meeting Date: June 2, 2010 On June 2 , 2010, representatives of IBM held a conference call with Access Board staff members to discuss questions about the ICT ANPRM. Present on the call were Andi Snow
-Weaver, Rich Schwerdtfager of IBM , and Access Board Staff members Bruce Bailey, and Timothy Creagan .
# C_2022428EN.01000401.xml

| 10.11.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 428/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.11.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 428/4

---

Notice from the Government of Malta concerning Directive 94/22/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conditions for granting and using authorisations for the prospection, exploration and production of hydrocarbons

(2022/C 428/04)

Pursuant to the Notice from the Government of Malta concerning the above-mentioned Directive published in the Official Journal of the European Union
  on 4 May 2013 (2013/C 127/04), the Ministry for Finance and Employment hereby notifies that Area 2 and Area 7 are now available for authorisation on a permanent basis under either an exploration licence or an exploration and production licence.

The Ministry for Finance and Employment also notifies that pursuant to the Notice from the Government of Malta concerning the above-mentioned Directive published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 1 August 2019 (2019/C 258/05), Blocks 1, 2 and 3 of Area 3 are now available for authorisation on a permanent basis under either an exploration licence or an exploration and production licence.

Information regarding this notice may be obtained by contacting the Director General of the Continental Shelf Department at the Ministry for Finance and Employment, Block E, Antonio Maurizio Valperga Street, Floriana, FRN 1700, Malta on dgcs.csmalta@gov.mt and on continentalshelf.gov.mt.

---
EXHIBIT
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Quarterly Report of NB Manufacturing, Inc. (the “Company”)
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Derold
L. Kelley, Secretary/Treasurer and Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge,:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as
      applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:           November
11, 2009


/s/Derold
L.
Kelley


Derold L.
Kelley


President,
Secretary/Treasurer and Director
**Exhibit 31.2**I, Gregory W. Starks, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Blue Dolphin Energy Company (the“Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have: a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  b) [paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986];  c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controlsand procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report (based on suchevaluation); and  d) Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions): a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: August 10, 2007     /s/ GREGORY W. STARKS  Gregory W. Starks  Vice President, Treasurer
**Exhibit 23.2****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**The Board of Directors
```

CONFIRMING STATEMENT

    This statement confirms that the undersigned, Stephan H. Fluhler, has authorized and designated, Jennifer Mainord and Addison Nicoll, to execute and file on the undersignedTMs behalf, all Form 3, 4, and 5 (including amendments thereto) that the undersigned may be required to file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission as a result of the undersignedTMs ownership of or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation.  The authority of Jennifer Mainord and Addison Nicoll under this statement shall continue until the undersigned is no longer required to file Form 3, 4, and 5 with regard to the undersigned ownership or transactions in securities of First Merchants Corporation, unless earlier revoked in writing.  The undersigned acknowledges Jennifer Mainord and Addison Nicoll are not assuming any of the undersignedTMs responsibilities to comply with Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Date: November 3, 2016                _/s/ Stephan H. Fluhler_
```