alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 79260]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22207]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED


Procurement List; Deletion

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

ACTION: Deletion from the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action deletes a service from the Procurement List that 
was furnished by nonprofit agencies employing persons who are blind or 
have other severe disabilities.

DATES: Date deleted from the Procurement List: October 27, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, 355 E Street SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael R. Jurkowski, Telephone: (703) 
489-1322 or email <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4a09071e0f0c2f2e182f2d0a0b282326233e3305242f642d253c"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="f3b0bea7b6b59697a19694b3b2919a9f9a878abc9d96dd949c85">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Deletions

    On August 23, 2024 (89 FR 68146), the Committee for Purchase From 
People Who Are Blind or Severely Disabled published notice of proposed 
deletions from the Procurement List. This notice is published pursuant 
to 41 U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3.
    After consideration of the relevant matter presented, the Committee 
has determined that the service(s) listed below are no longer suitable 
for procurement by the Federal Government under 41 U.S.C. 8501-8506 and 
41 CFR 51-2.4.

Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification

    I certify that the following action will not have a significant 
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The major factors 
considered for this certification were:
    1. The action will not result in additional reporting, 
recordkeeping or other compliance requirements for small entities.
    2. The action may result in authorizing small entities to furnish 
the service(s) to the Government.
    3. There are no known regulatory alternatives which would 
accomplish the objectives of the Javits-Wagner-O'Day Act (41 U.S.C. 
8501-8506) in connection with the service(s) deleted from the 
Procurement List.

End of Certification

    Accordingly, the following service(s) are deleted from the 
Procurement List:

Service(s)

Service Type: Grounds Maintenance
Mandatory for: Federal Aviation Administration, Patrick Henry Field 
(PHF) Air Traffic Control Tower, 2402 G Avenue, Newport News, VA
Authorized Source of Supply: VersAbility Resources, Inc., Hampton, 
VA
Contracting Activity: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, 697DCK 
REGIONAL ACQUISITIONS SVCS

Michael R. Jurkowski,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2024-22207 Filed 9-26-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
* 

### Pursuant to 5 TH 

### C IR 

### . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH 

### C IR 

### . R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-40677 Summary Calendar
ESSIE T. COOPER, Planitiff-Appellant,
versus KILGORE JUNIOR COLLEGE; WILLIAM HOLDA, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas (USDC No. 6:98-CV-556)

_______________________________________________________ January 25, 2001 Before REAVLEY, DeMOSS and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * 

### Plaintiff-appellant Essie T. Cooper appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s findings and conclusions and entering summary judgment for2



### the defendants. Cooper’s claims are time-barred for the reasons given in the magistrate judge’s report of April 11, 2000. Affirmed.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, June 14, 2017. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, June 14, 2017 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A17D0461. CLYDE F. HOLLAND v. PHEOBE SUMTER MEDICAL CENTER et al. . Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED.
LC NUMBERS: 2017CV00068
#### Flossie HENDERSON v. STATE.

No. 20399.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 3, 1939.

Jimmie Cunningham, of Graham, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

KRUEGER, Judge.

The offense is theft of property of a value less than.$50. The punishment assessed is confinement in the county jail for a period of sixty days and a fine of $100.

This case is similar in every respect to the case of Flossie Henderson v. State, 127 S.W.2d 902, this day decided by this Court. The legal questions involved are identical in both cases. For the reasons there stated, we are constrained to reverse and remand this cause.

The judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause remanded.

PER CURIAM.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
<TABLE>
<S><C>
                                                              Exhibit 10(h)

                                                              February 26, 1998


Mr. M. T. Yonker
Portec, Inc.
One Hundred Field Drive, Suite 120
Lake Forest, Illinois  60045

Dear Tim:

The purpose  of this letter  is to confirm  that your employment agreement  with Portec, Inc.  (the "Company"), in  letter form and
dated  December 28,  1988,  as amended  and  restated on  February  23, 1989,  on  December 12,  1989,  and on  July  9, 1997  (the
"Agreement"), is hereby amended as follows:

Section 3(b)iii is added as:

After the two year  period of section 3(b)ii, the Company will, if you desire, provide  health insurance as provided by the Company
for  its salaried employees or executive personnel  generally, for you and your current  wife, Ingrid F. Yonker, for the additional
period  until such time  as both of  you qualify for  Medicare coverage, provided,  however, that such  insurance coverage benefits
shall be reduced  to the extent similar  insurance coverage benefits are actually  provided for you and your  dependents by another
employer during such  additional period or any  part of such period,  and provided further that  you shall be required  to continue
making payments for  coverage of dependents similar to payments required of the Company's salaried employees or executive personnel
generally under the Company's health plan.  If such coverage cannot by the  terms of such health plan, be provided thereunder, then
the  Company will provide  equivalent insurance coverage for  you for such  additional period under specially  obtained policies of
insurance,  provided however,  that such  insurance coverage benefits  shall be  reduced to  the extent  similar insurance coverage
benefits are actually provided for you and your dependents  by another employer during such period or any part of  such period, and
provided further that you shall be required to continue  making payments for coverage of dependents similar to payments required of
salaried employees or executive personnel under the Company's health plan.

                                                   Yours truly,



                                                   Albert Fried, Jr.
                                                  Chairman of the Board
</TABLE>
| **Related Party Transactions (Tables)**   | 12 Months Ended                                                                                                                                                      |
|-------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
||
| **Related Party Transactions [Abstract]** |                                                                                                                                                                 |
| Loans to Related Parties                  | The following is an analysis of loans to related parties (dollars in thousands):December 31, 2012$1,733Advances1,823Repayments(2,095)Other(778)December 31, 2013$683 |

| X                                                                                                                                                                    |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Details**Name:**us-gaap_RelatedPartyTransactionsAbstract**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**xbrli:stringItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
| X                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| - Definition
Tabular disclosure of related party transactions. Examples of related party transactions include, but are not limited to, transactions between (a) a parent company and its subsidiary; (b) subsidiaries of a common parent; (c) and entity and its principal owners and (d) affiliates.
+ References
No definition available.
+ Details**Name:**us-gaap_ScheduleOfRelatedPartyTransactionsTableTextBlock**Namespace Prefix:**us-gaap_**Data Type:**nonnum:textBlockItemType**Balance Type:**na**Period Type:**duration |
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 187 (Thursday, September 26, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Page 78902]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-22058]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--The Institute of Electrical and Electronics 
Engineers, Inc.

    Notice is hereby given that, on July 1, 2024, pursuant to section 
6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), The Institute of Electrical and 
Electronics Engineers, Inc. (``IEEE'') has filed written notifications 
simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade 
Commission disclosing additions or changes to its standards development 
activities. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending 
the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to 
actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, 46 new 
standards have been initiated, and 19 existing standards are being 
revised. More detail regarding these changes can be found at: https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/20may2024/, https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/06jun2024/. The following pre-
standards activities associated with IEEE Industry Connections 
Activities were launched or renewed: https://standards.ieee.org/about/bog/cag/approvals/june2024/.
    On September 17, 2004, the IEEE filed its original notification 
pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice 
published a notice in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of 
the Act on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on April 11, 
2024. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2024 (89 FR 52090).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2024-22058 Filed 9-25-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
ACCEPTED

04-14-00758-CV

FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS

SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS

4/30/2015 11:31:46 AM

KEITH HOTTLE

CLERK

 FILED IN 4th COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 4/30/2015 11:31:46 AM KEITH E. HOTTLE Clerk
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ MICHAEL T. MINOMichael T. MinoChief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2007  EX-10
I 

114TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. R. 3069 

To amend section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to 

eliminate the time limit on the filing of a motion to reopen a removal 

proceeding if the basis of the motion is fraud, negligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, or the attempted, promised, or actual practice 

of law without authorization on the part of, a representative. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 15, 2015 

Mr. VEASEY (for himself, Mr. CA ́RDENAS, Ms. JUDY CHU of California, Mr. 

CONYERS, Mr. FARR, Mr. GRIJALVA, Mr. GUTIE ́RREZ, Mr. HINOJOSA, 

Mr. HONDA, Ms. JACKSON LEE, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Ms. LEE, Ms. 

LOFGREN, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Mr. MCGOVERN, Ms. MENG, Ms. NORTON, 

Mr. O’ROURKE, Mr. POLIS, Mr. RANGEL, Ms. SCHAKOWSKY, Mr. 

SERRANO, Mrs. TORRES, Mr. VARGAS, Mrs. NAPOLITANO, Mr. ELLISON, 

Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas, and Mr. CUMMINGS) introduced the following 

bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nationality Act to eliminate the time limit on the filing 

of a motion to reopen a removal proceeding if the basis 

of the motion is fraud, negligence, misrepresentation, 

or extortion by, or the attempted, promised, or actual 

practice of law without authorization on the part of, 

a representative. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HR 3069 IH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Notario Victim Relief 

3 Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. ELIMINATION OF TIME LIMIT ON MOTIONS TO RE5 OPEN IN CERTAIN CASES. 

6 Section 240(c)(7)(C) of the Immigration and Nation7 ality Act (8 U.S.C. 1229a(c)(7)(C)) is amended by adding 

8 at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(v) FRAUD, NEGLIGENCE, MISREPRE10 SENTATION, OR EXTORTION BY, OR AT11 TEMPTED, PROMISED, OR ACTUAL PRAC12 TICE OF LAW WITHOUT AUTHORIZATION

13 ON THE PART OF, A REPRESENTATIVE.— 

14 There is no time limit on the filing of a 

15 motion to reopen if the basis of the motion 

16 is to apply for relief due to fraud, neg17 ligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, 

18 or attempted, promised, or actual practice 

19 of law without authorization on the part 

20 of, a representative described in subsection 

21 (a) or (b) of section 1292.1 of title 8, Code 

22 of Federal Regulations, or a person who 

23 claimed to be such a representative, and 

24 the alien establishes such fraud, neg25 ligence, misrepresentation, or extortion by, 

26 or attempted, promised, or actual practice 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•HR 3069 IH

1 of law without authorization on the part 

2 of, such a representative (or person) by a 

3 preponderance of evidence.’’. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK4TPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

| INDIANA                                        | 35-1544218                        |
|------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------|
| (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |

|   | o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

----

----

| 99.1   | Press Release, dated July 28, 2011, issued by First Merchants Corporation |
|------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
EXHIBIT 32.1



                       CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                        18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                        AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
              SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Portsmouth Square, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I John V. Winfield, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.


Date: October 17, 2005                          /s/ John V. Winfield
                                                ----------------------------
                                                John V. Winfield, President
                                                and Chief Executive Officer




[A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Portsmouth Square, Inc. and will be retained by Portsmouth
Square, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.]
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

As adopted pursuant to

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Quarterly Report of Park Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 16, 2010, (the Report), I, David A. Remijas, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



|1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ David A. RemijasDavid A. RemijasChairman and Chief Executive OfficerAugust 16, 2010




23
#### Ex parte JOHNSON.

No. 15372.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas.

May 11, 1932.

Harvey P.‘Shead, of Longview, for appellant.

Lloyd W. Davidson, State’s Atty., of Austin, for the State.

MORROW, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order refusing to discharge the relator on a writ of habeas corpus.

From the record it appears that the requisition issued by the Governor of Texas recites that it has been made known to him by the Governor of Oklahoma that T. H. (Cyclone) Johnson stands charged by information and bench warrant before the proper authorities with the crime of disposing of mortgaged property committed in said state, and that said defendant has taken refuge in the state of Texas.

It has been uniformly held by the courts of this state that the Governor is not authorized to issue a requisition upon the showing that the alleged fugitive is charged in the demanding state by information. The demand should show that the alleged fugitive is charged by complaint, affidavit, or indictment. The recital in the executive warrant is prima facie evidence that the charge against the relator is by information. The papers accompanying the- application for - a requisition are not before this court; nor is there legal evidence controverting the correctness of the recital mentioned. The proof before this court, therefore, is that the relator is not properly charged with an offense,- and that the Governor’s warrant is not authority for the further detention of the relator. See Gibson v. State, 96 Tex. Cr. R. 428, 257 S. W. 1101; Ex parte Holt, 92 Tex. Cr. R. 614, 244 S. W. 1016; Ex parte Lewis, 75 Tex. Cr. R. 320, 170 S. W. 1098.

The judgment is reversed, and the relator ordered discharged.
**Exhibit 32.1**

CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersignedhereby certifies, in his capacity as an officer of Channell CommercialCorporation (the “Company”), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best ofhis knowledge:

·                  The Quarterly Report of the Companyon Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

·                  The information contained in suchreport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operation of the Company.

Date:  November 14, 2006
|        | By:    | /s/ William H. Channell, Jr.          |   |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------|--------|
|   |   | William H. Channell, Jr.              |
|   |   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | By:    | /s/ Patrick E. McCready               |   |
|   |   | Patrick E. McCready                   |
|   |   | Chief Financial Officer               |

 

----