alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 FORM 8-K
 CURRENT REPORT
 Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
  Grey Wolf, Inc.
 (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 Texas
(State or Other Jurisdiction 
of Incorporation)
    
    1-8226
(Commission File Number)
    
    74-2144774
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 10370 Richmond Ave., Suite 600
Houston, TX 77042
 713-435-6100
 (Not Applicable)
   o
 o
 o
 o




---



##### 



ITEM 2.02 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
   ITEM 9.01 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
 (c) Exhibit
  SIGNATURE
   GREY WOLF, INC./s/ David W. WehlmannDavid W. WehlmannExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer




---



##### 



EXHIBIT INDEX
 Exhibit Number
    
    DescriptionExhibit 99.1
    
    Grey Wolf, Inc. Press Release dated August 1, 2007.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the                     *Eunice Kennedy Shriver*                     National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Special Emphasis Panel, Optimizing Outcomes of Children and Adolescents with Perinatal HIV Exposure (U19), November 07, 2024, 09:00 a.m. to 05:00 p.m., 6710 B Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on August 28, 2024, FR Doc. No. 2024-19290, 89 FR 68911.                

This notice is being amended to change the meeting from a one-day meeting on November 7, 2024, 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., to a two-day meeting starting on November 7, 2024, 9:00 a.m. to November 8, 2024, 5:00 p.m. The meeting is closed to the public.

Dated: September 25, 2024. 

Lauren A. Fleck, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2024-22375 Filed 9-27-24; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
#### The State, ex rel. Sunderman, Appellant, *v.*Barber, Sheriff, Appellee.

(No. 28790

Decided December 10, 1941.)

*Mr. George 8. Hawke,*for appellant.

*Messrs. Kenney & Hinders,*for appellee.

By the Court.

Paragraphs numbered 2, 28 and 4 of the prohibition petition read:

> “2. Relator says that he is one of the defendants in a certain action now pending, for foreclosure of real estate mortgage, filed by the Peoples Bank Company of Port Recovery, Ohio, against Henry Sunderman (now deceased, father of relator), and others on May 22, 1934, being case No. 12494 on the docket of the Court of Common Pleas of Mercer county.”

> “28. Relator says that the Common Pleas Court on July 6, 1934, made an order granting relator further time to plead in said action, but unfortunately through oversight of counsel, answers of the defendants were not filed on August 3, 1934 as they should have been. Thereupon, without any notice to counsel of record that it intended to apply for a default judgment, the *85plaintiff secured a default judgment and an order of sale on August 6, 1934, and thereby frustrated all relator’s efforts to have the case heard on its merits.”

> “4. That in said foreclosure action said court on May 24, 1941, entered an order overruling a motion filed September 28, 1934, and amended September 18, 1939, to set aside a default judgment, which motion and amended motion were fully submitted to the court on evidence on September 22, 1939, and held under advisement until said May 24, 1941; and said order further decreed that an alias order of sale issue.”

A writ of prohibition may not be employed as a substitute for appeal. 32 Ohio Jurisprudence, 574, Section 12; *State, ex rel. Garrison,*v. *Brough,*94 Ohio St., 115, 113 N. E., 683; *State, ex rel. Norris,*v. *Hodapp, Judge.*135 Ohio St., 26, 18 N. E. (2d), 984; *Shafer*v. *Common Pleas Court,*137 Ohio St., 429, 30 N. E. (2d), 811.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.

*Judgment affirmed.*

Weygandt, C. J., Turner, Williams, Matthias, Hart, Zimmerman and Bettman, JJ., concur.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Partners, LP on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Laura Buss Sayavedra, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC, general partner
of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP, general partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Partners, LP.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                        |  |  |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 12, 2008 |  |  |  | /S/    LAURA BUSS
SAYAVEDRA                                                                                                                                                                          
|                        |  |  |  | Laura Buss Sayavedra Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Spectra Energy Partners GP, LLC General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners (DE) GP, LP General Partner of Spectra Energy Partners, LP
|                        | 
|                        | 
|                        | 
|                        |
UNITED STATES OF AME RICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTEC TION BOARD

ALISON KOHLER, Appellant,

v.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELA ND SECURITY, Agency. DOCKET NUMBER NY

- 0752

- 15

- 0199

- I

- 1

DATE: February 25, 2016

Alison Kohler , Oceanside, New York, pro se. Shayla N.M. Sipp
, Esquire, Washington, D.C., for the agency.

BEFORE
Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman Mark A. Robbins, Member

ORDER ¶1 The appellant has filed a petition for review of the initial decision, which dismissed her removal appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The two Board members cannot agree on the disposition of the petition for review. Therefore, the initial decision now becomes the final decision of the Merit Systems Protecti on Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 12 00.3(b) ( 5 C.F.R. § 1 200.3 (b)). This decision shall not be considered as precedent by the Board in any other case. 5 C.F.R. § 1200.3 (d)

.2

NOTICE TO THE APPELL ANT REGARDING YOUR FURTHER REVIEW RIGHTS You have the right to request review of the final decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. You must submit your request to the court at the following address: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 717 Madison Place, N.W.

Washington, DC 20439

The court must receive your request for review no later than 60 calendar days
after the date of this order. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703 (b)(1)(A) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). If you choose to file, be very careful t o file on time. The court has held that normally it does not have the authority to waive this statutory deadline and that filings that do not comply with the deadline must be dismissed. See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management
, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991). If you need further information about your right to appeal this decision to court, you should refer to the Federal law that gives you this right. It is found in
title 5 of the United States Code, section 7703 ( 5 U.S.C. § 7703 ) (as rev. eff.
Dec. 27, 2012). You may read this law as well as other sections of the
United States Code, at our website, http://www.mspb.gov/appeals/uscode.htm

. Additional information is available at the court’s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov

. Of parti cular relevance is the court’s “Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants,” which is contained within the court’s Rules of Practice , and Forms 5, 6, and 11. If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website

at http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The3

Merit Systems Protection Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that any attorney will accept representation in a given case.

FOR THE BOARD:

Washington, D.C. ______________________________ William D. Spencer Clerk of the Board
EXHIBIT 32

                                  CERTIFICATION
                           Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350
                 (Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)

In connection with the Report on Form 10-Q of North American Gold & Minerals
Fund (the "Company") for the period ended November 30, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald
Yadin Lowenthal, as Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: February 10, 2010              By: /s/ Ronald Yadin Lowenthal
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Ronald Yadin Lowenthal
                                         Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies each Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

Nos. 14-1376; 14-1377

THE FPE FOUNDATION,
Plaintiff, Appellant/Cross-Appellee,

v.
LEWIS COHEN, as co-trustee of the Qualified Terminable Interest Property Trust,
Defendant, Appellant/Cross-Appellant,
MARTIN P. SOLOMON, as co-trustee of the Qualified Terminable Interest Property Trust; BETSY A. SOLOMON, as trustee of the LLLB Trust; J. ROBERT CASEY; BETSY A. SOLOMON and MARTIN P. SOLOMON, as co-trustees of the Cohen-Solomon Family Foundation,
Defendants, Appellees/Cross-Appellees.

**ERRATA SHEET**
The opinion of this Court issued on September 2, 2015 is amended as follows:
On page 7, line 20, and page 8, line 2, change "Suit" to "suit"
UN PUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17

- 2333

THOMAS G. FIGANIAK; VALERIE A. FIGANIAK, as Administrators of the Estate of Kevin Figaniak;

Plaintiffs

- Appellees

,

and

CRAIG TYLER PEACOCK, individually; JARRETT CHANDLER, individually

,

Defendants

- Appellees

,

v.
TYLER JOHNSON, individually

,

Defendant

- Appellant

,

and

FRATERNAL ORDER OF OWL ’ S HOME NEST; LOYAL ORDER OF OWLS NEST LODGE 2558, d/b/a The Owls Nest, a West Virginia corporation; YE OLDE ALPHA, INC., a West Virginia corporation

,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia

, at Wheeling

. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.

, Senior District Judge. ( 5:15

- cv

- 00111

- FPS )

Submitted : July 31, 2018 Decided: August 9, 2018

Before NIEMEYER
, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.2 Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

John J. Hare, Shane Haselbarth, MARSHALL DENNEHEY WARNER COLEMAN & GOGGIN, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellant. Ho ward J. Bashman, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania; Jeffrey P. Goodman, SALTZ, MONGELUZZI, BARRETT & BENDESKY, P.C., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Guy R. Bucci, Ashley N. Lynch, HENDRICKSON AND LONG PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.3 PER CURIAM:

Defendant Tyler Johnson appeals the jury verdict finding him liable in tort to

Plaintiffs Thomas and Valerie Figaniak for the death of their decedent, Kevin Figaniak,

and the district court’s order denying Johnson’s posttrial motion for , inter alia, a new trial

and for judgment as a matter of law. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Figaniak v.

Johnso n , No. 5 :15

- cv

- 00111

- FPS ( N.D.W. Va. Oct. 20, 2017 ). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
BOAR D O F TRUSTEE S DENNI S J . COLUN S PRESIDEN T TIMOTH Y A . STRUTHER S VIC E PRESIDEhf T CARO L B . ZA R CLER K ATTORNE Y KEIT H FOSTE R 

### DEKAL B SANITAR Y DISTRIC T 30 3 HOLLISTE R AVENUE , DeKalb , Illinoi s

Mailin g Address : POS T OFFIC E BO X 62 4 DEKALB , ILLINOI S 60115-062 4 Telephone : 81 5 758-351 3 Fax : 81 5 758-661 5 EMAIL : mail@dekalbsanitarydistrict.c» m OFFICER S MAR KEDDINGTON , P.E . DISTRIC T MANAGE R JANIC E TRIP P TREASURER/ASST . M6R . ADMIN .

STEV E OLSE N OPERATION S MANAGE R DIAN A F0UST,S.PJ1.R . ASSISTAN T T O MANAGERm.R . July 26 , 201 1 U.S . Departmen

t o f Transportatio n Ms . Susa n Kurland , Assistan

t Secretar y fo r Aviation Affair

s 120 0 Ne w Jersey Avenue , S.E . Washington , D.C . 2059 0 I

.. o 

### X ! m n " i

e n C./

3 Subject : DeKal

b Taylor Municipa l Airpor t Application fo

r Gran t Assistanc e unde

r th e Smallcfiommunit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Program : Docket : DOT-OST-2011-011 9 Ms . Kurland : O n behalf of th e DeKal

b Sanitar y District , pleas e accept

thi s lette r of suppor t fo r th e Cit y o f DeKal b Taylo r Municipa

l Airport' s application fo r assistanc e imde

r th e Smal

l Communit

y Ai r Servic e Developmen

t Program . Ou r airpor t support s an

dencoiu^ge s loca

l busines s growt

h within th e Stat

e o f Illinois , particularly i

n th e DeKal b Count y area. . W

e fee l bot h statewid e an dloca l busines s wouldbenefi

t significantl

y fi-omgran

t assistance . I

t offer s man y amenitie s tha

t ca n hel p curren t loca l busines s owners expand . Th e gran t would allow th e Cit

y o f DeKal b to better marke t th e uniqu e opportunitie s an dservice s tha

t ou r airpor t currently provides . Certainly , w e fee l tha t astrategi c marketing pla

n wouldencoxirag

e bot h ne w an destablishe d businesse s to conside

r relocatin g an

dexpanding t

o th e norther

n Dlinoi s region bringin g valuabl e employmen

t opportunities . A s yo u ma y b e aware , th e Cit

y o f DeKal b i s hom e to Norther

n Illinoi s University , which i s attende dby 24,40 0 student s representing all 5 0 state s severa l U.S . territories , a s wel

l a s 10 0 foreig n countries . DeKal b i s als o majo

r distributio n cente

r fo r larg e internationa

l companie s suc

h a s 3M an

dTarget . Wit

h capacit y to accommodat

e plane s up to th e siz e o f

aBoeing 737 , th e airpor

t ha s th e infi^structur

e i n plac e t o serv e avariet

y o f trave l needs . Than k you , fo r considering ou

t suppor t fo r th e DeKal

b Taylo r Municipa l Airport , contac t m e if yo u bav e an y questions . Sincerely , Pleas e fee l fi-ee to

DeKa h Mark ] Distric t Manage r

. ' • i cc : Povlsen , Moor e ' -'"'* '
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF
                                            CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF
                                  ALTERNATIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT ACQUISITION CORP.

This
certification is provided pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and
accompanies the quarterly report on Form 10-Q (the Form 10-Q) for the quarter ended
June 30, 2008, of Alternative Asset Management Acquisition Corp. (the Issuer).

I, Paul D. Lapping, the Principal
Financial Officer of the Issuer, certify that to the best of my knowledge:

(i)
the Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)); and

(ii)
the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer.

|Dated:  August 12, 2008 | /s/ Paul D. Lapping                                                                                                                  
|----------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                        | Paul D. LappingChief Financial Officer 
                                                                (Principal Financial
Officer)
Exhibit (23)




         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As  independent public accountants, we hereby consent to  the
incorporation  by reference of our report dated  January  25,
1999, included in Owens Corning's annual report on Form  10-K
for  the  year  ended December 31, 1998, into  the  Company's
previously filed Registration Statements, File Nos.  33-9563,
33-9986, 33-9987, 33-18262, 33-20997, 33-27209, 33-31687, 33-
48707,  33-57886,  33-60487, 333-09367, 333-24501,  333-48153
and 333-47961







                            ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP



Toledo, Ohio
March 12, 1999
U

. S. Deportme n t o f T ransportation Federal Aviation Administration


## JAN 0 8 2016

Mr. Ra fael Gustavo Fassina Marques Airworthiness Office Embraer S.A. Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2.170 12227-90 1

- S.J. do s Campos- SP Brasil

Dear Mr. Marques: Transport Airplane Directorate 1601 Lind Avenue , S.W. Renton

. Wash i ngton 98057-3356

We have received your petition l etter number GCF

- 1933/2015, dated November 13 , 2015 , on behalf ofEmbraer S.A. , to extend the time limit of exemption no. 1 0974 to January 15 , 20 17. That exemption, from§§ 25.562(a) at Amendme nt 25-64 and 25.785(b) at Amendment 25

- 88 , of Title 14 , Code of Federal Regulations , and from FAA Special Cond itions 25-495-SC, number 2(e) , prov ides to Embraer an exemption from the lower-leg flai l requirement s for the forward

- most seat position on all side-facing seats on Embraer Mode l EMB-550 and EMB-545 airplanes, serial numbers 1 through 55 ; and provides a t imeframe w ithin wh ich Em braer must develop a comprehensive comp l iance plan and schedule for s u bsequent airp l anes. Your request is located in docket no. FAA

- 20 13-0810 in regulations.gov. The FAA has reviewed your petition to extend exemption no. 10974. The current exemption requ ires Embraer to s ubmit a monthly s tatu s report. The last status report the FAA had received was dated October 2015. Therefore , Emb raer is current ly out of compliance w ith the existing exemptio n . Please note that Embraer must submit monthly status reports as required by the exemption. The FAA submitted to Embraer , on October 21 , 2015, the stage 2 issue paper for the leg flail airbag. As of th i s letter, Embraer has not s ubmitted a response to th e issue paper regarding their positio n . Embraer must submit their position to this issue paper before the FAA can begin process i ng the subject exemption time-limited exte n sion. Before we can process you r petition, we require more information. 1. How many airplanes have been delivered in accordance with the cur r ent exemp tion ? 2. When will a irpl ane se rial number 55 be delivered? 3. How many additional airpl anes are s cheduled to be delivered under the new proposed exemp tion time- l imit exten s ion (if extended to Decemb e r 31 , 20 16) ?I f you have questions , please contact J ayson Claar at 425-227-2194 , or at jayson.claar @ faa.gov. Sincere ly ,

uzanne asterson Manager , Airframe a nd Cabin Safety Bran ch , ANM -115 Tran sport Stan dard s Staff
#### STANOLIND OIL & GAS CO. v. LA BEFF.

No. 3764.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. El Paso.

Dec. 22, 1938.

Rehearing Denied Jan. 19, 1939.

F. J. Scurlock and Turner, Rodgers, Winn & Sellers, all of Dallas (Clay Tail-man and Leslie A. Thompson,, Jr., both of Tulsa,' Okl., of counsel), for .appellant.

C. E. Patterson, of Alpine, and Joseph G. Bennis, of El Paso, for appellee on rehearing.

HIGGINS, Justice

(after stating the casfe as above)'.

The proper disposition of this appeal is clearly and completely ruled by the decisions and opinions of the Austin Court of Civil Appeals in Shell Petroleum Corporation v. Tippett, 103. S.W.2d 448, in *975which a writ of error' was refused by the Supreme Court, and Stanolind Oil & Gas Co. v. H. P. Allison, 121 S.W.2d 480. The cases cited are directly in point and support the view that appellant should recover upon the three theories relied upon by it, and that the defensive issues urged by the defendant are without merit.

In view of the opinions rendered in those cases and the action of the Supreme Court in refusing a writ of error in the case first cited, it would serve no purpose whatever to discuss the matter. It follows that the judgment should be reversed and here rendered in favor of appellant for $1632, with interest from February 1, 1934, as prayed by plaintiff. It is so ordered.

Reversed and rendered.